The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/12/94Where there is no vision the people perish HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Wuk^- `.pec-. Adr/I76144e1-- WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agenda is developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allotted. ElIn compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, ifyou need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. GLOSSARY Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law -or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager... The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. "April is the month when the green returns to the lawn, the lilac and the I.R.S." AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 12, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. MAYOR Sam Y. Edgerton MAYOR PRO TEM Robert Benz COUNCIL MEMBERS John Bowler Julie Oakes J. R. Reviczky CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATION: MEDAL OF VALOR. WEEK APRIL 18 - 22, 1994 PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF CHECK TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited by law from taking immediate action on any Public Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Dennis Martin dated March 28, 1994 regarding dumping of tree trimmings on the Greenbelt. 2. Letter from Carol A. Vaughn dated March 28, 1994 requesting the placement of two new crosswalks. 3. Letter from Howard Longacre dated April 6, 1994 regarding missing portions of City meetings in the video replay tapes as delivered to MultiVision. 4. Letter from James Lissner dated April 7, 1994 regarding the recording and replay of City meeting video tapes. 5. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1994 requesting Closed Session discussion regarding a personnel issue. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on March 22, 1994; and, 2) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on March 24, 1994. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment of two Community Services Officers. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated March 28, 1994. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution adding the City Manager and the Police Chief to the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's VISA card. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 31, 1994. (f) Recommendation to receive memorandum from the Tri -Cities Adjudication Program and direct staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature in opposition of AB2414. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen R. Burrell dated April 4, 1994. (g) Recommendation to receive and file an information report regarding the grace period for parking permits. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 31, 1994. (h) Request for approval for use of the Community Center lawn by the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot for the 1994 holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 31, 1994. (i) 6 ) Recommendation to approve purchase of three (3) parking enforcement vehicles. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Strauser dated April 4, 1994. Recommendation to accept construction as complete for the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path - CIP 90-144. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 21, 1994. (k) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Memoranda of Understanding between the City of Hermosa Beach and the California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees Union, Local 911, General/Supervisory and Administrative Employees' Bargaining Units. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 5, 1994. (I) Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent to study commercial development standards. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1994. (m) Recommendation to adopt resolutions regarding the Engineer's Report and setting a date of June 14, 1994 for Public Hearing of the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District 1994-1995. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 23, 1994. (n) Recommendation to adopt resolutions regarding the Engineer's Report and setting a date of June 14, 1994 for Public Hearing of the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1994-1995. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 21, 1994. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 94-1106 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13.5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SIGNS, TO CREATE EXCEPTIONS FOR HISTORIC SIGNS AND FOR GRAND OPENINGS" For adoption. Memorandum from Deputy City Clerk Naoma Valdes dated March 28, 1994. b. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT DOGS ON ACTIVE SCHOOL GROUNDS AND AT THE BILTMORE PARK SITE. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 4, 1994. c. 1. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE AND CLOSURE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND STREET FESTIVALS. For waiver of full reading and introduction; and, 2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE AND CLOSURE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND STREET FESTIVALS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 4, 1994. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO EXAMINE ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1994. 5. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1994. 6. 1994 CONFORMANCE SELF -CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP), AND ADOPTION OF THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 5, 1994. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. MULTIVISION'S RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 94-5666 REGARDING RATE REGULATION. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated April 4, 1994. 8. REPORT ON OIL PROJECT - REIMBURSEMENT OF CITY'S COST AND ATTORNEY FEES. Memorandum from City Attorney Charles S. Vose dated March 16, 1994. (Continued from March 22, 1994 meeting) 9. SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: ENCROACHMENTS AND REQUESTS FROM RESIDENTS TO PURCHASE LAND. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 4, 1994. 10. REDUCING PARKING ENFORCEMENT TIME LIMIT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA (Continued from March 22, 1994 meeting) AND ONE HOUR PARKING AT LOWER PIER AVE. DURING THE MONTH OF MAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 5, 1994. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER SELECTION OF DATE FOR THE JOINT STUDY SESSION BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL, HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen R. Burrell dated March 21, 1994. (Continued from March 22, 1994 meeting) 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Mayor Pro Tern Benz to consider a 5 day work week for all customer service related departments. b. Request from Mayor Pro Tern Benz to consider the installation of a customer service comment box in the Council Chambers foyer. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT to a Closed Session on April 14, 1994 at 7:00pm. TO: Honorable Hermosa Beach City Manager Stephen Burrell and Honorable City Council Members March 28, 1994 FROM: Dennis Martin, Hermosa Beach Citizen 1820 Ardmore Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90250 310-372-4457 SUBJECT: Trashing the Green Belt with Tree Trimmings I have been a resident of Hermosa Beach for one year. I live in the Pepper Tree Apartments on Ardmore Avenue overlooking the wonderful Green Belt path between Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive. That Green Belt path has provided me with many hours of enjoyable exercise. During my many trips on the path, I have removed a lot of paper, plastic and broken glass litter in order to enhance the natural setting of the path. The beauty of the green trees and plants and the firm surface of the path have all been greatly appreciated until a few weeks ago. RECEIVED MAR 2 8 1994 CITY MGR OFFICE Recently, the city has permitted what I consider to be excessive dumping of tree trimming trash on the path. I want to describe to you why I regard the dumping to be an ecological abomination to residents and visitors who may desire to use the path for healthy exercise, aesthetic nourishment or convenience. A few weeks ago I was astonished to see trucks dumping huge amounts of tree trimmings consisting of odd -sized wood chips, fragments of branches, tree cones and stinky leaves on the path. Please look at the specimens which I have prepared as evidence of the dangerously large wood chips, twigs from branches and chunks of tree limbs which path users must confront whenever they choose to walk, run or bike on the path (Exhibit "A"). When I first observed the conglomeration of tree trimmings being dumped on the path, I quickly called City Hall and asked who was responsible for this tree trimming atrocity on the path and was given the name of Mike Flaherty of maintenance. I was told that it was a custom done every six months. I told the secretary that this was the first time it had been done during the past year since I began using the path nearly every day. I asked the secretary to pass along the message of my discomfort and urged her to have Mike consider my complaint to stop the dumping. However, the trash dumping has continued. I had hoped that by waiting a few weeks I might become more objective about the issue and discover some value in the dumping. I had hoped the tree trimmings would quickly dry up and blow away or blend into the sandy soil. Unfortunately, that wish has not come true. In fact, the more I walk and run and bike on the path, the more angry I get about the ruination of the_path as the dumpers keep trucking toward Gould Avenue. Last week I learned that Superintendent of Public Works, Amy Amirani, is responsible for managing the Green Belt. Now I ask her to reconsider and remove the tree trimming trash quickly. I believe it is urgent that city officials who care about the quality of life on the path bl 2 investigate the difference between walking, running and biking on the new uneven tree trimmings and compare that to walking, running and biking on the old firm surface which still exists just south of where Gould Avenue crosses Ardmore and Valley. Luckily, since the surface there has not been contaminated yet, that stretch of a few hundred feet of path is still fun to run and bike on. That harder surface seems to be far superior to the tree trimming trash which has now also been dumped northward between Gould Avenue and Boundary. I think the decision to dump tree trimmings may have been based upon bureaucratic expediency. It may have been based more on an urgency to get rid of the tree trimmings quickly rather than because the path really needed to be resurfaced. Please start investigating now while something can still be done to restore the firm and level original surface of the path. I suggest that the city use a bulldozer or a tractor with a blade to clean the path and then use a scoop loader to put all of the tree trimmings onto a truck for deposit somewhere else. It could be dumped on a city compost pile to finish rotting so the tree trimming trash could be recycled into something useful for gardeners. The good intentions of the overzealous dumpers may have some merit in the long-term cosmic view of the universe --because trees do decompose eventually. But the immediate and most direct negative consequence to walkers, runners and bikers ig obvious. Sadly, the Green Belt path is now more of a blight area than a recreational strip. This is proven by the fact that most of the frequent joggers who run daily on the Green Belt now run on a narrow sandy trail which meanders through the plant growth and around the trees closer to Ardmore Avenue. There, next to the street, runners are exposed to more traffic fumes which are more dangerous to their health than they would be if they were running and breathing the cleaner air on the main path which goes down the middle of the Green Belt. Perhaps the most positive asset of the tree trimming trash dumping is that in this one instance it causes men and women to get closer together, even for the few seconds it takes to pass and not bump each other off the tiny trail! Some runners have developed an ingenious sidestep which barely slows their stride as they pass. It is funny to watch the runners attempting to pass each other on the narrow trail. But it is not amusing to realize the increased danger to their health and safety due to the tree trimming debris on the main path. Therefore, I would like to urge members of the city council and city manager's staff to personally become involved in this quality of life issue. I would like this subject agendized and discussed as soon as possible. Please request a quick cost/benefit analysis which should include an informal EIR to represent the needs of path users. Please include the concerns which I have referred to in this letter. I have summarized them in the following itemized list which reflects my perception of the problems and remedies for the health, safety and aesthetic needs of Green Belt path users: 3 TREE TRIMMING TRASH HAZARDS --DANGERS FOR HUMANS AND PETS: 1) The large, sharp chunks of wood in the tree trimming trash could easily strain or sprain a foot, ankle, knee or hip since the surface is unreliable underfoot. The surface is unpredictable because it is uneven with soft spots and hard wood chunks. Please observe the specimens of tree trimming trash in the zip lock plastic bag (Exhibit "A"). There are many larger, worse pieces of tree trimmings on the path but it would take a wheelbarrow or truck to carry all of the worst pieces to City Hall for scientific investigation and public exhibition. 2) The allergens from the dead leaves which produce moldy dust and stinky fumes are toxic to people with allergies or impaired immune systems due to hydrocarbon poisoning or other diseases. This is a more serious problem than just one of strong odors from rotting leaves and the turpentine smell from the wood chips. The "dust" accumulates underfoot as the tree trimmings disintegrate under the pressure of human and pet feet striking the ground many thousands of times each day. This toxic dust gets dispersed into the air in a worse way every time a shoe or a paw hits the path. This accumulating dust should be removed and a little sand or sawdust should be trucked in to fill the gopher holes and smooth the path for good drainage. The path does not now drain well after a rainstorm. And now it looks and smells more like a cesspool than a lush green oasis in the urban sprawl. 3) Runners who fear the hazards of the tree trimming trash with the high risk of muscle sprains and strains now take a narrow trail to avoid that danger. But now, they are exposed to more unhealthy --more concentrated --doses of hydrocarbon compounds from car and truck traffic fumes than they would have been on the main path since the narrow trail is closer to the street. These fumes have been shown to cause deadly lesions in the lungs of joggers. So, the most healthy way to manage the Green Belt would be to keep the main path in the middle of the Green Belt in the best possible condition for users. They would be more motivated then to use the middle path rather than to create detours which destroy the Green Belt plants in their desperate attempt to avoid the dangerous obstacles on the path. 4) More dog walkers permit their dogs to do more "pooping" on the path without cleaning up the messes. The pet messes are harder to pick up by owners and harder to detect by runners until they are stepped on. Previously, dog piles could be spotted more quickly and you had more time to avoid them. Now more paper and plastic garbage is also left on the path since it blends in. 4 FINAL PLEA AND CONTINGENCY PLAN Please respect the needs of path users in all future city plans for managing the Green Belt path resources. I believe that if only half the time and effort required by city staff to dump the tree trimmings on the path would have been used to enhance it, the Green Belt path would now be in excellent shape for those of us who choose to use it for improved health and convenience. I believe that once the tree trimming trash is removed, the following Green Belt enhancements could be implemented quickly: 1. Water the path at least twice each week so the dust on the path would be reduced and result in an absorbent crusty surface good for walking, running and biking. Now the weekly Tuesday morning trickle of water on the plants and trees is inadequate for the foliage as well as the path. In fact, the trees and plants directly in front of the Pepper Tree Apartments are turning yellow from lack of regular watering. PLEASE, if nothing else is done quickly, at least start watering the Green Belt trees and plants more adequately so they will stay green! 2. Rake the crust of the path from time to time to keep the surface smooth for good drainage. The harder and more level surface of the sandy soil mixed with smaller wood chips provided a firmer surface that was much more comfortable for walking, running and biking. And it drained and dried quickly. Now the surface is mushy. 3. Trap the gophers and tamp down the burrow dirt so path users won't trip and injure themselves. A little sand or sawdust at appropriate places would make it ideal. Thank you very much for reading and thinking about this alternative approach to Green Belt resource management. I believe the Green Belt is a great treasure which should not be allowed to deteriorate further. March 28, 1994 Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: New Crosswalk Placement Dear Council, RECEIVED MAR 3 0 1994 CITY MGR, OFFICE I am writing to request the placement'of 2 crosswalks in separate areas of Hermosa Beach. Please consider plaing a crosswalk at the intersection of 28th Street and Manhattan Avenue, the south side of this intersection. Unfortun- ately, this thoroughfare between Gould and Longfellow has become very busy and cars are often travelling in excess of the 30mph speed limit. I have witnessed many near misses and I believe a crosswalk would slow down the traffic and insure safety for the many children, adults and families that cross there. Secondly, I would like to see a 4 -way crosswalk placed at the 4 -way stop of Gould and Morningside Drive. Again, this is a major thoroughfare to and from our city. I have seen many cars roll through the stop signs there and to make matters worse both east -west directions and north -south have blinded sides. Many people cross here because of the park, and I feel crosswalks would make that crossing much safer. I implore you for the safety of the children and citizens in our community to place these crosswalks as soon as possible. Please place this on the Written Communications Agenda at the next City Council Meeting. Carol A. Vaughn 316 28th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310/376-8469 b2 RECEIVED APR - 6 1994 Attention: City Manager of Hermosa Beach, City Councilmembtaw, MGR. OFFICE City Clerk, and City Finance Director: Please place this letter under written communications from the public on the agenda of the regular council meeting to be held 4/12/94. From: Howard Longacre, 1221 7- PI, Hermosa Beach, Ca 6 April 1994 Re: Missing portions of city meetings in the video replay tapes as delivered to Multivision. Reference my letter dated 3/29/94, attached. Mayor, Councilmembers and others: As outlined in my letter of 3/29/94 the replay tape of the 3/22/94 Council meeting had alterations made to it in the area of the meeting's recording wherein four municipal items of 50 minutes duration were replaced with a 'Recess' sign. The replay tape of last night's Tuesday 4/5/94 Planning Commission meeting as delivered by city staff to Multivision, is missing the first 25 minutes of the meeting including the public testimony portion of the first public hearing item #7. The balance of the meeting was replayed on Multivision today Wednesday at noon. A city memo dated 3/30/94 from Michele D. Tercero to Viki Copeland does not explain what happened to the 50 minutes of the 3/22/94 council meeting and of who directed the alterations of the tape to be made. It should be noted that the VCR recorded approximately 1 hour of material after the one 'break' that was taken in that meeting. In other words the VCR was not off. The tape was tampered with. Another recording shows people in the council chamber near midnight of 3/22/94. The questions in my letter of 3/29/94 are still pertinent and still not answered. The incident regarding the joint -council -and -planning -commission meeting which evidently involved 'audio hacking' by an 'outsider' is a separate problem which I assume you are already dealing with. However, the technical problems encountered with the wireless microphones cutting in and out throughout the meeting needs to be effectively addressed by the audio contractor. The primary reason for buying the new audio system was to eliminate this very problem. b3 Longacre to Council 4/6/94 Page 2 I would like to suggest that the council immediately turn over the recording of our meetings to Multivision (through an agreement if necessary). That they provide the camera person(s) to do a more professional job and that this be connected with our franchise renewal much as the microphone and city attorney's costs. The current system has the city blaming Multivision and Multivision blaming the city. As an observer, I believe there have been some problems with replay timing at Multivision, but in my view all problems with the recordings have been due to problems with city procedures, and equipment. Having observed these problems for seven years, problems that never go away, along with the apparent apathy of some council members with respect to the importance of the public being able to view their elected representatives, it is evident that this process needs to be put into the hands of a single entity. One which has both the technical expertise and the accountability to handle this matter. It should be noted that Multivision handled this function entirely for Manhattan Beach up until their franchise renewal. I suggest as a small city we need to have Multivision handle this function, and this should start immediately. This is clearly a function that can be handled better by the private sector. It is isolated and well defined. I hope you will take decisive action immediately, and it would seem this can be done administratively, to correct this problem, a problem which makes the city, and its council look incompetent, but most of all deprives the people from having an accurate view of their city proceedings. Thank you for your interest. To: Hermosa Beach Mayor and Council Members City Manager Stephen R. Burrell City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 From: Howard Longacre, Hermosa Beach, 90254 29 March 1994 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 1994 CITY MGR. OFFICE Re: Alterations made to the video tape recording of the 3/22/94 Council meeting as delivered to Multivision for replay. The VHS video tape of the meeting of Tuesday 3/22/94 and as delivered to Multivision for replay noon of the following day (Wednesday 3/23/94) was altered. Municipal items #9, thru #12 of the meeting, which were transmitted live and with no apparent problem, were replaced with a 'Council in Recess' video message on this delivered tape. The municipal items replaced with the dubbed in 'Recess' message included the discussions and testimony regarding #9=South School Park Award of Contract, #10=Biltmore Park Masterplan, and #12=Los Angeles County Lifeguard and Beach Maintenance Services. The dubbed in 'Recess' message starts right at the end of the BFI rate adjustment discussion, but about 15 seconds ahead of the final BFI vote. Following about 12 minutes of the 'Recess' video message the council meeting reappears with the discussions picking up at the return to the consent calendar and the discussion of item-1f=criteria for distribution of in - lieu parking spaces. The balance of the meeting was then on the tape as transmitted live. Prior to this return to the meeting, there is about 5 seconds of video interference noise on the tape following the 'Recess' message. The items missing which took 50 minutes of live -time were thus replaced with about 12 minutes of the 'Recess' message. Longacre to Council 3/29/94 Page 2 The live meeting ended about 11:30pm. To an observer at home Tuesday night 3/22/94 the picture then went to color bars followed by the return to Multivision's ever changing 12 second picture spots. However, a few minutes later there was a return to a live transmission coming from the council chambers. Some people were still in the council chamber doing something with the camera at this late hour and it was going out over the cable system live. This transmission over the city's cable system included a live transmission of the very 'Recess' video message that appeared in the tape delivered to Multivision for the following day's replay. This was observed and recorded by myself and another individual in city. This recording clearly shows a hand adjusting the 'Recess' sign. These same identical images are those which appear on the tape of the meeting as played over Multivision Wednesday and Friday following the meeting. Clearly the 'Recess' message was processed in the council chamber between 11:40pm and Midnight of the same night 3/22/94. Some of the important questions that need research are the following. 1 -Who was present in the council chamber until and possibly after midnight Tuesday 3/22/94 after the meeting ended with no closed session? 2 -Who recorded the 'Recess' message onto the tape for Multivision's replay use? 3 -Why was the 12 minute 'Recess' message placed on the tape, and at this particular point in the meeting's recording? What happened to the 50 minutes of recording of the important items #9, #10, and #12 mentioned above? 4 -Who made the decision to have the 'Recess' message placed into the tape? 5 -Was the entire meeting recorded on 1, 2 or more tapes initially, and if so why? 6 -If the meeting was in any way copied from 1 or more tapes to another tape, who now holds the original tapes, and why and when was this copying accomplished? Longacre to Council 3/29/94 Page 3 I have loaned a copy of the full meeting, as recorded directly off the cable, to Multivision and it was played Monday 3/28/94 at noon. Multivision as of Monday morning 3/28/94 was holding the 3/22/94 tape as delivered to them by city staff. I would request that a report be made by the city manager to the council and public regarding this matter as soon as possible. It should be understood that while replay of the meetings is the goal, the nature of this letter pertains not to that issue. This letter pertains to the alteration of the video recording of the 3/22/94 public council meeting as delivered to Multivision for replay purposes. My interest, and I certainly hope it is your interest also, is in understanding exactly why and how this alteration took place. Thank you for your time, noward ongacre cc James Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, California. April 7, 1994 The City Council City Hall Hermosa Beach, California For the meeting of April 12 Honorable Councilmembers: By fax First, I ask you to reconsider, at your earliest opportunity the City's decision which has forbidden the cable company from making the usual replay of the tape of a recent controversial council meeting. Second, in the light of the above as well as microphone problems and a rash of losses of major portions (longer than 18 minutes) of the tapes of at least two recent meetings, 1 ask you to quickly make a formal statement that will tell staff of your permanent policy about how well you expect city meetings to be recorded and. and how often you expect city meetings to be re -televised. S= ncere1y, b4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Pi , •tor SUBJECT: Request for Closed Session Discussion Regarding Personnel Issue DATE: April 7, 1994 I recently submitted an appeal regarding the certification of the list of candidates for Community Development Director. For the second time, the City Manager has informed me that the City Attorney has informed him that there is no appeal to the City Council (He further indicated that I could discuss this matter as a communication at a City Council meeting). However, in the past, the City Council has not always agreed with the City Attorney's opinion. For this reason, I believe the City Council should take some formal position on this issue. Further, I think the City Council needs to know all the circumstances surrounding this matter, and I do not think an open public meeting is the place to discuss it. Also, the options available to the City regarding this whole matter need to be examined. There is no mandate to reorganize, or hire anyone. This current situation of having the Building under Planning could remain as is temporarily or indefinitely. yy\memocc b5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on March 22, 1994, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Chantel Hargis, MultiVision Cable TV ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Pro Tempore Benz Absent: Mayor Edgerton ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Pro Tempore Benz announced that item #7, under Municipal Matters, had been removed from the agenda at the request of staff. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with the potential for a conflict of interest if Mayor Edgerton and Councilmember Bowler vote on Chamber of Commerce items as both are Chamber Boardmembers; feels they should not render Council votes on Chamber items; Brian Crispen - 139 30th Street, spoke regarding resident parking permits; said he had been told by the Cashier's Department that there was a "grace" period for the renewal of last year's permits, but had received a parking ticket during that time (City Manager Burrell said he would bring the item back on the agenda for the Regular meeting of April 12, 1994); Jan McHugh - 718 First Place, expressed concern that the appraisal for the Vasek Polack land sale/swap was not public record; also concerned that the City is making improvements to the property; questioned if the three new Councilmembers had read the documents (City Attorney Vose said that appraisal reports are exempt from the Public Records Act until the contracts are signed. All Councilmembers said they had read the contracts and transaction records thoroughly.); Paul Scannell - 531 Loma Drive, questioned how he could speak to his letter (item (b)1); John McHugh - 718 First Place, questioned the signs in Mayor Pro Tempore Benz' windows and whether he would apply for a permit for the "Ironman Contest"; and, Robert McAlinden - "Bestie's" owner, resident, spoke positively of his experience with Mayor Edgerton and Mayor Pro Tempore Benz and spoke against the effort for their recall. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 845611 0.) (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 1. Letter from Frances Parker, Paul Scannell and Susan Fuhs dated February 14, 1994 regarding the South School site. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney responded to Coun- cil questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Paul Scannell - 531 Loma Drive, spoke to the joint letter which requested that they be allowed to purchase the ten foot strip of South School Park land behind their homes. Action: To agendize the issue of all encroachments on the South School Park site. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. So ordered, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. 2. Letter from Carol Hunt, Executive Director of the Her- mosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, dated March 15, 1994, requesting approval for closure of Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive on June 19, 1994 for the "Pier Promenade Street Scene". Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Warren Barr - Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce President, said the Chamber had placed this letter on the agenda in order to bring its planned event before the Council and the public and to answer any questions. Community Resources Director Rooney said that this item would be brought before the Council on a future agenda in conjunction with the request for the Women's Volleyball Tournament. Action: There was no action taken on this item. (Mayor Edgerton absent) 3. Memorandum from the Planning Commission dated March 17, 1994 regarding requested topics for discussion at the City Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting scheduled for March 29, 1994. Action: After general discussion among the Councilmembers, the consensus was to accept the items listed, with the understanding that the item on C.U.P.s would take most of the meeting time and it might be necessary to schedule an additional joint meeting for the balance of the items. There was no further action taken. (Mayor Edgerton absent) At 7:33 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting at item 4. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8457 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (i), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (f) Reviczky, (I) Oakes. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. So ordered, noting the ab- sence of Mayor Edgerton. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. At 8:58 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to Municipal Matters starting with item 7. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 8, 1994. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 8, 1994 as presented, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS Nos. 46692 through 46824 inclusive, noting -voided warrants Nos. 46694, 46695, 46749, 46750, 46782, and 46785. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AND FEBRUARY 1994 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the February 1994 Financial Reports as presented, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. (e) REQUEST FOR 30 -DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF TWO PUBLIC WORKS FIELD PERSONNEL AND ONE POLICE SERGEANT. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated March 1, 1994. - Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for 30 days the temporary appointment of two Public Works Field Personnel and one Police Sergeant, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8458 (f) REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CRITERIA FOR DISTRIBUTION OF IN - LIEU PARKING SPACES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 15, 1994. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Council - member Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meet- ing, due to questions regarding the funding of additional parking spaces. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Patricia Spiritus - Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission member, spoke to clarify the program and the criteria policy requested by the Commission. Action: To approve the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission recommendation to approve the criteria for distribution of the 20 In -Lieu parking spaces for business incentive as follows: 1) any assignment or distribution subject to City Council approval; 2) first priority to loss of parking on Pier Avenue or Hermosa Avenue due to R/UDAT implementation; 3) remaining distribution based on the following: a) new construction or remodels of existing build- ings; b) only to meet parking requirements for daytime of- fice/retail use; — c) only to projects under 10,000 square feet; and, d) maximum allocation limited to 50 percent of re- quired parking needs, with the understanding that Councilmember Reviczky's con- cerns, that money be set aside from the in -lieu fees to cover the expense of providing the parking spaces when it became necessary to comply, be noted. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried unani- mously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO STUDY CONSOLIDATION OF BEACH CITIES FIRE DEPARTMENTS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 16, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation that a con- tract for an amount not to exceed $39,325 be awarded to Ralph Anderson and Associates (selected by all three beach cities) to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of consolidating the three beach cities' fire departments, with the understanding that the award of the contract is contingent upon the decision of Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach to also approve the study and with the understanding that the actual cost to Hermosa Beach would be one-third of the contract cost which equals $13,108 ($15,000 was ap- City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8459 proved for the study in the 1993-94 budget), noting the ab- sence of Mayor Edgerton. (h) REQUEST FROM THE KIWANIS CLUB TO BUILD A TRASH ENCLOSURE ON CITY OWNED PROPERTY. Memorandum from Planning Director Mi- chael Schubach dated March 15, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the request to construct a trash enclosure on public property which is currently leased to the Kiwanis Club, with the un- derstanding that a building permit will also be secured by the Kiwanis Club, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. (i) REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF OFFICE FURNITURE FOR THE DOWNSTAIRS AREA OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated March 15, 1994. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Council - member Oakes for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to a question of where the money came from for the As- set Forfeiture Fund. Police Chief Straser responded to Council questions and said the money was awarded by the Court from assets seized in narcotic cases. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize the purchase of office furniture to outfit the downstairs area of the Police Department through the Los Angeles County purchase agreement #54807 with McDowell Craig Office Furniture of Norwalk for a total cost of $40,134.21, which was approve in the 1993-94 budget with funding through the Narcotics Asset Forfeiture Fund. Motion Oakes, second Bowler. The motion carried unani- mously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items l(f) and (i) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. CABLE TELEVISION FCC FORM 393: DETERMINATION OF BASIC CABLE TV RATES, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated March 10, 1994. Assistant City Manager Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8460 The public hearing opened at 7:35 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on this item were: Chantel Hargis - MultiVision Cable TV representative, requested that the Council reject the staff recommendation and to approve the staff alternate recommendation to accept the current rates as reasonable due to: 1) questionable information from the City's consultant, C.S.G.; 2) the impact of the five percent Franchise Fee and the ten percent Utility User Tax would amount to approximately $12,500 that the City would have to repay or credit to MultiVision; 3) MultiVision's belief that they have met the guidelines and benchmarks; and, 4) new rules from the FCC will be out about May 15, 1994, and MultiVision wishes to go on the record as being opposed to rate regulation; and, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., suggested the City go out to bid in order to have more than one Cable TV company in Hermosa; said MultiVision had taken basic programs away and placed them in a super" category that now cost Hermosa Beach residents more money. The public hearing closed at 7:48 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) accept the equipment and installation rates as reason- able; 2) disapprove the rate for the Basic Service tier as un- reasonable, prescribe a lower rate and order refunds; and, 3) adopt Resolution No. 93-5666, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 76.936, 76.940, 76.941 AND 76.942 OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION DISAPPROVING EXISTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR THE BASIC SERVICE TIER, IN PART, PRESCRIBING RATES AND CHARGES FOR BASIC SERVICE TIER, AND SEEKING COMMENT WHY REFUNDS SHOULD NOT BE ORDERED.", as amended on page two, Section 5, to change the date of the meeting to read, "...7:30 P.M. on April 12, 1994 ...". Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried unani- mously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. 5. TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE: a) Historical sign exemption b) To allow temporary grand opening and special event signs c) To increase the amount that window signs are allowed to obscure the windows from 20% to 50%, City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8461 with an Ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 14, 1994. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:10 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on this item were: Roy Palmer - 1909 Bayview Drive, spoke in favor of unrestricted signage for businesses; and, Steve Crecy - Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Chairperson, spoke in favor of restricting signage and cited Carson Blvd. as an example of the difference that sign restriction can make to the visual blight of an area. The public hearing closed at 8:13 P.M. Action: To approve the Planning Commission and staff re- commendation to amend the Sign Ordinance by: 1) adding provisions to allow reconstruction of noncon- forming historic signs; 2) adding exceptions for temporary -grand opening signs (to allow balloons, flags, and pennants); 3) introducing Ordinance No. 94-1106, as amended by the City Attorney to change Resolution to Ordinance in the title and to add in Section 1, page two, second paragraph, "An exception may be granted to allow repair or replication of the sign by the procedure set forth..."; and, _ 4) to refer window signage back to the Planning Commission to study incorporating window signs into the overall signage allowed a business as Manhattan Beach does. Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 94- 1106, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13.5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SIGNS, TO CREATE EXCEPTIONS FOR HISTORIC SIGNS AND GRAND OPENINGS." _ Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Pro Tempore Benz NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Edgerton ABSTAIN: None 6. FINAL ADOPTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT REVISION AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 15, 1994. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8462 Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:35 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:35 P.M. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 94-5667, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AND REVISING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. The meeting recessed at 8:36 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:55 P.M. and returned the order of the agenda to item 1. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REPORT ON REDUCTION OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT TIME LIMIT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 15, 1994. Mayor Pro Tempore Benz had announced at the start of the meeting that this item had been withdrawn at the request of staff. 8. REPORT ON BFI RATE INCREASE, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 15, 1994. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Chip Scholz - Director of Community Relations for BFI, responded to Council questions and said the increase was needed due to the increase in fuel, tires and the general cost of doing business; said this was only the second increase in three and one half years; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey -Blvd., questioned why residents were required to pay extra for recycling, if the City was given any part of the money collected from recycling, and why residents were required to pay in advance of the service being performed; Hollie Murray - 1775 Valley Drive, said he paid his bill one year in advance and felt this represented a contract with the company, yet received a bill to pay the balance after the last increase; Vitaly Gorodetsky - 1115 First Street, questioned why residents only received one recycling bin, felt City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8463 it would be better if recyclables were separated; said he had called and had received no response from the company; Bill Feldon - (no address given), questioned why there was no large item pick-up; said people dumped old furniture in the road near his business and was told he had to pay to have the items removed; and, Chip Scholz - BFI, apologized to Mr. Gorodetsky for not returning his call; said that there was free large item pick-up for residential but a charge for commercial, however arrangements could be made to pick up "dumped" item if he was contacted; said the monthly cost per residence for recycling was $3.40 and extra recycling containers are available, but it was less expensive for BFI to pick up non -segregated material and separate it at its facility as the greatest cost in recycling was the time a truck was on the street. Action: To approve the staff recommendations to: 1) approve a 4.18 percent rate increase for residential and commercial accounts effective April 1, 1994, with the condition that BFI not request another rate in- crease before April, 1995; and, 2) adopt Resolution No. 94-5668, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 4.18 PERCENT REFUSE RATE INCREASE AND A 4.18 PERCENT RECYCLING RATE INCREASE EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1994.0 Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Pro Tempore Benz and the absence of Mayor Edgerton. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR SOUTH SCHOOL SITE, with Resolution for adoption. Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 14, 1994. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Community Resources Director Rooney also responded to Council questions and said that the entrance to the park had not been finalized, that the park entry was one of the areas the consultant was being asked to address. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Hollie Murray - 1775 Valley Drive, recounted early history of the site; questioned where the entrance would be as he had heard it would be from Cypress and felt this would not be a good entry street as Cypress was a congested area with many businesses and would need curbs and sidewalks; suggested that the entry be from Valley Drive with parking on the Greenbelt; City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8464 Bruce Menendez - 1420 Hermosa Avenue, business owner on Cypress, requested that the City send a letter to all owners and businesses on Cypress so that everyone is aware of the potential for a park entrance from Cypress; Steve Crecy - Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Chairperson, gave a background on the year-long process, including two public hearings, before the Commission; said all property owners had been notified by mail, but the problem was that some of the business owners were not the property owners; thought it might be possible to have the entrance from Valley Drive; thanked the Council for approving the landscape architectural study; Charles Lapham - 1255 Tenth Street, Cypress property owner, said he was not notified; said everyone on Cypress was happy now and did not want more traffic or parking on the street as it could not be accommodated. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to : 1) award the contact for the South School Park landscape architectural services to J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. in the amount of $19,843; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes to the contract as necessary within the budget; and, 4) adopt Resolution No. 94-1169, entitled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT URBAN TREE PLANTING COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE SOUTH SCHOOL PARK PROJECT." Motion Oakes, second Bowler. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. 10. BILTMORE PARK MASTER PLAN. Memorandum from Community Re- sources Director Mary Rooney dated March 14, 1994. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. Public Works Director Amirani also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, displayed his design and his model and suggested that they also be considered by the architect; concerned that the berms not be high enough that someone could hide behind them; objected to any cul-de-sac, bus parking or Police cars on the property; and said the paths should be less than 10 feet wide; City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8465 Patricia Spiritus - Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission member, questioned if xeroscape plantings were being considered (staff responded that they were); Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, said the Ordinance was clear, a cul-de-sac or road on the property was not allowed; Betty Martin - 257 27th Street, said 15th Street needed "No Through Street" signage as people would come down the street, not be able to turn around, then drive through commercial property to get out, creating a hazard (staff responded that there was such signage, but would try to increase or enlarge it); Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., stressed that the City staff must obey the people's vote on the Ordinance; and, Dallas Yost - 65 Pier Avenue, said there was already a parking problem downtown and the Biltmore Park would create a need for even more parking; felt this and the turn -around problem on 15th Street were problems that had to be addressed. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Re- sources Advisory Commission recommendation to forward the conceptual suggestions and items of concern for the Bilt- more Park site to the architect, Lawrence Moss and Associ- ates, who was awarded the park design proposal at an amount of $6,000. Items of concern include: 1) no hardscape pathways (decomposed granite or other natural surface); 2) ground plane landscape shall consist of turf, ground - covers and flowers - shrubbery should be avoided or minimized; 3) trees should be mature shade trees (potential for a very large tree in the center of the park should be explored); 4) tall landscape elements should beincluded near the buildings on 15th Street; 5) security issues such as lighting and visibility should be addressed; 6) sense of entry should be from the Strand; 7) no tot lot; 8) no dogs allowed; and, - 9) keep walkways to a maximum width of ten feet. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. 11. REPORT ON OIL PROJECT - REIMBURSEMENT OF CITY'S COST AND ATTORNEY FEES. Memorandum from City Attorney Charles Vose dated March 16, 1994. Mayor Pro Tempore Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the Regular meeting of April 12, 1994 in order for Mayor Edgerton to be present as he had requested the item. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8466 12. LOS ANGELES COUNTY LIFEGUARD AND BEACH MAINTENANCE SERVICES. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Roo- ney dated March 15, 1994. Assistant City Manager Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions stating that the public hearing with the board of Supervisors is scheduled for May 5, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) receive and file the County Beaches and Harbors staff report; 2) direct the City Council sub -committee to meet with representative from the other cities to discuss this issue and to prepare for the Public Hearing at the Board of Supervisors; and, 3) direct the City Attorney to prepare a report regarding the legal issues surrounding the County's proposed po- tential service withdrawal. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. At 10:20 the order of the agenda was returned to item 2. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER. Supplemen- tal memorandum from City Manager Stephen R. Burrell dated March 21, 1994. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and ex- plained that the previous date of April 14, 1994 was not available for some of the other boardmembers, but the dates of Thursday, May 12, 1994 at 7:00 P.M. or Thursday June 2, 1994 at 7:00 P.M. were suggested as alternates. Action: Mayor Pro Tempore Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the Regular meeting of April 12, 1994 in order for Mayor Edgerton to be present. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Request from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: a. REOUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER BENZ TO DISCUSS REDUCING TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX TO CORRESPOND WITH NEIGHBORING CITIES. Supplemental Memorandum from Finance Direc- tor Viki Copeland dated March 7, 1994. (Continued from meeting of March 8, 1994) Mayor Pro Tempore Benz discussed his request and asked if there was any interest from other Councilmembers. There was none. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8467 Action: There was no action taken on this item. (Mayor Edgerton absent) b. REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER BOWLER FOR A DOCUMENT OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 34 (PRINGLE) REQUIRING FUNDING FOR MANDATED CITY PRO- GRAMS. Letter from Assemblyman Curt Pringle dated February 25, 1994 with a copy of the proposed consti- tutional amendment attached. Councilmember Bowler discussed his request. Action: After general discussion, it was directed by consensus of the Council that staff forward letters of support for all legislation regarding State funding for State mandated cost issues. (Mayor Edgerton absent) c. REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER BOWLER TO DISCUSS A "SUNSET" CLAUSE FOR ALL NEW CITY ORDINANCES. Councilmember Bowler discussed his request. City Manager Burrell said that "sunset clauses" could be added to Ordinances regarding conduct, but it would not be appropriate to have "sunset clauses" on zoning Ordinances. City Attorney Vose said the City Code was antiquated and needed to be recodified to eliminate outdated or unenforceable portions, but "sunset clauses" could be added on a case by case basis to new Ordinances. Action: After general discussion, -it was directed by consensus of the Council that staff include a "sunset clause" in all general Ordinances. (Mayor Edgerton absent) d. REOUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER BOWLER FOR SUPPORT FOR THE ROBERTI LIBRARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BILL (SB1448). Supplemental letter with attachment from the City Council Library Subcommittee received March 21, 1994. Councilmember Bowler discussed his request and explained that this bill would allow the City to form a Library District if approved by a vote of the people, and, this might be necessary if, as stated by the County, the County Library budget does not include funding for Hermosa Beach. Action: After general discussion, it was directed by a consensus of the Council that staff respond in support to any legislation pertaining to funding of local Libraries. (Mayor Edgerton absent) e. REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER BENZ TO CONSIDER A 5 DAY WORK WEEK FOR ALL CUSTOMER SERVICE RELATED DEPART- MENTS. City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8468 Mayor Pro Tempore Benz requested that this item be continued to the Regular meeting of April 12, 1994. City Attorney Vose said the Brown Act that goes into effect on April 1, 1994 requires that agenda items contain adequate information for the public to understand the nature of the item, and without that information the Council is limited solely to the question of whether to agendize the item or not, the Council is not entitled to discuss the item. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Chris Boyle - Redondo Beach, said that in his opinion the "new" Brown Act was really the Council's friend; that the agenda needed tightening, especially "Other Matters - Council"; said getting to the drinking fountain on the bike path still creates a problem, but he was pleasantly surprised at the good job done on the north end of the bicycle path; and, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., spoke regarding the four -ten work schedule for City Hall staff; said that after eight hours anyone's efficiency decreased therefore she favored a return to a five day work week; questioned who got the money from the Chamber of Commerce proposal to close lower Pier Avenue and sell booth space on June 19, 1994, said the City should share in the profit from closing a public street. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, March 22, 1994 at the hour of 11:25 P.M. to an Adjourned Regular Meeting of Thurs- day, March 24, 1994 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of a closed session to discuss matters of Meet and Confer, Personnel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; matters of Pending Litigation pursuant to government Code Section 54956.9(a): Natural Resources Defense Council v. Beverly Hills et al. (Hermosa Beach); and , matters of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Shefman v. City of Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa Beach and Allen v. City of Hermosa Beach. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8469 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on March 24, 1994, at the hour of 8:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton Absent: None CLOSED SESSION - At the hour of 8:32 P.M., the Council adjourned to a closed session for the purpose of discussion of matters of Meet and Confer, Personnel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; matters of Pending Litigation pursuant to government Code Section 54956.9(a): Natural Resources Defense Council v. Beverly Hills et al. (Hermosa Beach); and , matters of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Shefman v. City of Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa Beach and Allen v. City of Hermosa Beach. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Thursday, March 24, 1994 at the hour of 10:30 P.M. to the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Tuesday, March 29, 1994 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of a joint workshop meeting with the Planning Commission dittzrynet-- Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-22-94 Page 8470 1a2) CITY OF IIERMOSA BEACH 4-FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 11:19:48 FOR 03/21/94 PAGE 0001 DATE 03/21/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO Si CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00618 $271.961.76 46827. PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-94 03/16/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 10.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $271.961.76 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. • 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00768 193.099.27 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00769 $90.574.90CR RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00231 11.364.86 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00096 $81.63 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 110-400-1204-4180 00034 11.736.64 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 FINANCE CASHIER /RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00238 $2.507.31 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 PARKING ENF /RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00201 $66.73 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00233 11.043.64 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT H • PUD EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00099 11.926.710 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 SPE(: INVESTVTN!_i /RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00151 1269.89 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT H PUD EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 705-400-1217-1180 00153 1346.21 RETIREMENT/FEB 94 03/16/94 WORKERS COIIP /RETIREMENT rrr VENDOR TOTAL w*****r*r***a*****a*a*a*ra****aa**par**aa**a*a*****vo*****noaaPnn*** n*r PAY CODE TOTAL *rr*rararaoara**a*raa*r*par**044,11***-r***r*+.an*aaoannr*aa..aaa...ao4on R ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE PIER MAINT/FED 94 35892 05221 001-400-3103-4201 00527 02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE $11.867.7 1283. 829. ,14 1680.00 35892 00079 46829 /CIINIRACT SERVICE/P (VAT 10 00 03/17/94 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 10.00 40.00 $0 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 46826 03/17/94 46826 03/17/94 46826 03/17/94 46826 03/17/94 46826 03/17/94 46826 03/17/94 46826 03/17/94 46826 03/17/94 46006 03/17/94 46626 03/17/ 94 46026 03/17/94 lb FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11 19:48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002 FOR 03/21/94 DATE 03!:,!1/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN tt AMOUN1 INV/REF PO 0 CHV, it DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCUUN I DF'. SCR 1 P 1 I ON AMOUI'J I UNENC DA TF_' k:xP *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************A l******** *41.0**********4****/,4*M* $680.00 R ALPHA OMEGA BUILDERS 05591 109-400-8148-4201 00008 $17,378.10 HOT -01 08092 46830 PMT 2/DWNTWN TRASH ENC BT -01 02/22/94 CIP 89-148 /CONTRACT SERVICE:/PRIVAT $0.00 03/17/94 R ALPHA OMEGA BUILDERS 05591 125-400-8513-4201 00015 $27,936.00 HDE-02 06610 46830 PROG PMT/RODAWAY PARK BE -02 03/09/94 CIP 89-513 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVA1 $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL M***************************4***** $45,314.10 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01522 *55.50 8337 00105 46831 PRISONER MEALS/MAR 94 8337 03/08/94 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/1.7/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 01.*****4*****4***4*******4*+-****4**s4**** $55. 50 R DFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS 04540 001-400-2101-4201 01465 $31.90 940200-0041723 00075 46832 MED WASTE DISPOSAL/FEB94 41723 02/28/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL M******************************* $31.90 R BILL'S SOUND SYSTEM 05464 001-400-8620-5402 00004 $6,210.16 011394 08607 46833 DAL/COUNCIL SOUND SYS 11394 03/14/94 CC SOUND SYSTEM /EGUIPMENT-•MORE THAN $50 $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL M**********A******A*A*******AAM*******p4**p***** $6, 210. 11, R BROWNING ►.•. FERRIS INDUSTRIES 02076 001-300-0000-3059 00114 1.9,1102.04 07042 46834 REFUSE LIEN FEES/94-95 02/28/94 /REFUSE LIEN FEE $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENOOR TOTAL***********************************************************'J***4**** $9,882.04 *4* R CALBO ABM 02101 001-400-4201-4315 00139 $150.00 ANNUAL DUES/C. SWARTZ 03/15/94 BUILDING /MEMBERSHIP VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $150.00 R CALPELRA 01616 001-400-1203-4316 00257 $75.00 SEMINAR REG/R. BLACKWOOD 03/15/94 PERSONNEL /TRAINING 07238 46835 $0.00 03/17/94 08408 46836 $0.00 03/17/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 0*. VENDOR TOTAL C11f OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R CARE STATION EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS/MAR94 •w• VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0003 DATE 03/21/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •77. Oo 03972 001-400-1203-4320 00707 $102.00 03/10/94 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS R CHEVRON USA. INC. GASOLINE PURCHASES/FEB94 208-8 •*+ VENDOR TOTAL 00634 001-400-2201-4310 02/28/94 FIRE $102.00 01092 46837 $0.00 03/17/94 00200 $70.73 789819208-8 01017 46838 /MOTOR FUELS AND LURES 40.00 03/17/94 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. IRRIGATION CLOCK REPAIR •wr VENDOR TOTAL $50.53 00374 001-400-6101-4309 01710 $50.89 6061 03/07/94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE_ MATERIALS R COM SYSTEMS. INC DISCOUNT OFFERED R COM SYSTEMS. INC DISCOUNT TAKEN R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB.94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94- R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R . COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 00017 001-202-0000-2021 00607 03/16/94 470. 89 $79.28 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00017 001-202-0000-2022 00798 479.28CR 03/16/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 00017 03/16/94 00017 03/16/94 00017 03/16/94 00017 03/16/94 001-400-1101-4304 00628 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00704 CITY CLERK 001-400-1131-4304 00930 $0.70 /TELEPHONE 42. 09 /TELEPHONE *3.53 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 001-400-1141-4304 00721 45. 29 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00781 03/16/94 CITY MANAGER 423. 19 /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00777 437.30 03/16/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 6061 08086 450.69 01017 40. 00 01.017 40. 00 01017 40. 00 01017 $0.00 01017 $0.00 01017 $0.00 01017 $0.00 01017 $0.00 46839 03/17/94 46641 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/FEB 94 411141 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00789 $19.21 03/16/94 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE • 00017 001-400-1206-4304 00712 $96.46 03/16/94 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1207-4304 0080 $9.47 03/16/94 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-2101-4304 03/16/94 POLICE 01395 4397.94 /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00701 03/16/94 PLANNING 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00704 03/16/94 BUILDING 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00849 03/16/94 PUB WKS ADMIN $14.48 /TELEPHONE 432. 70 /TELEPHONE $65.78 /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00894 $74.14 03/16/94 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00017 107-400-2601-4304 00257 $2.90 03/16/94 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-1204-4304 00100 $16.87 03/16/94 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00797 $13.91 03/.16J9.4._-_ _-.__PARKING ENF. /TELEPHONE R VIKI *COPELAND REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSE TR41S.. 411111 VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0004 DATE 03/21/94 INV/REF PO $ CHK k AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $751.92 00041 001-400-1202-4317 00100 $87.69 . 03/16/94. ... __._ .. FINANCE ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE R DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL HOSP. BI -ANNUAL FIRE PHYSICALS -0017 1 $87.69 01017 $0.00 01017 $0.00 01017 $0.00 01017 $0.00 01017 *0.00 01017 $0.00 01017 40.00 01017 $0.00 01017 40.00 01017 $0.00 01017 *0.00 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/1.7/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46041. 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 46841 03/17/94 TR418 07843 46842 $0.00 03/17/94 00047 001-400-1203-4320 00706 $7.200.00 8000162-0017 01089 01/31/94 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 46843 03/17/94 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 PAGE 0005 DATE 03/21/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO It CHK $ DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL $5, 200. 00 R DAVIDSON INVESTIGATIONS 05448 001-400-2101-4201 01466 $975.00 BACKGROUND CHKS/NOV—FEB 02/28/94 POLICE 01091 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************arm***a*m*** $975.00 46844 03/17/94 R CLAUDIA*DE FRIES 05640 001-210-0000-2110 O'i658 150.00 76201 08318 46045 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 76201 03/16/94 /DEP111-1ITS/WORK GUAPANTE.E $0 00 03!17!94 R CLAUDIA*DE FRIES 05640 001-300-0000-3895 00162 $7.70CR 76201 08316 46849 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 76201 03/16/94 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE 4.0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************ara*n-a**n****n $42.3'.? R L`EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 001--400-3104-4251 00155 $550 83 128745 08097 46846 HIGHWAY MAINT/DEC 93 28745 12/31/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 03/1.7/94 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00156 $118.73 129082 08095 46846 HIGHWAY MAINT/JAN 94 29082 02/25/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 03/17/94 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00218 $550.84 128745 08097 46946 HIGHWAY MAINT/DEC 93 28745 12/31/93 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 03/17/94 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00219 $118.74 129082 08095 46846 HIGHWAY MAINT/JAN 94 29082 02/25/94 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL a***** $1,339.14 R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2101-4201 01464 $182.51 344933594 00007 46847 PD COMPUTER MAINT/MAR 94 33594 03/04/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03!1.7/9 R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2201-4201 00463 $121.68 344733/94 00007 46847 PD COMPUTER MAINT/MAR 94 33594 03/04/94 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03!17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL a*n** $304.19 R DIVE N' SURF 00604 001-400-2201.-4309 01595 $108 25 001458 01021 46848 BREATHING APP REFILLS 01458 02/28/94 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/17/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0006 FOR 03/21/94 DATE 03/21/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO U CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ K ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *•• VENDOR TOTAL R DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY 04394 001-400-2101-4305 02157 FILM PURCHASES/POLICE 96957 02/24/94 POLICE ••* VENDOR TOTAL n4a4• $108. 2: $155. 63 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $155. 63 096957 01022 46849 $0.00 03/17/94 R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00266 $935.79 01026 46850 LEGAL ADS/FEB 94 02/28/94 CITY CLERK /PUIILIC NOTICING 40.00 03/17/94 ••* VENDOR TOTAL *935.79 R EDEN SYSTEMS. INC. 05626 001-400-1206-5402 00092 $27,588.00 PMT 1/FINANCE SOFTWARE 00232 03/02/94 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -MORE THAN *500 •** VENDOR TOTAL $27.588.00 000232 00082 *0. 00 46851 03/17/94 R EMERG MED SERV PERSONNEL FUND 03372 001-400-2201-4316 00393 *30.00 06240 46852 RE -CERT EXAM FEE/CARROLL 03/15/94 FIRE /TRAINING *0.00 03/17/94 •** VENDOR TOTAL EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. JANITOR SERV/FEB 94 •** VENDOR TOTAL 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00654 02/28/94 BLDG MAINT *30. 00 $1.325.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR.IVAT $1,325.00 00039 46853 $0.00 03/17/94 R FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 01962 125-400-8515-4201 00009 $78.00 5-179-50735 08608 46854 BID DELIVERY SERVICES 50735 03/07/94 CIP 89-515 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 03/17/94 *•* VENDOR TOTAL $78. 00 R STEVE*FILLMAN 03169 001-300-0000-3893 04205 $406.00 WINTER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 03/14/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *•* VENDOR TOTAL*•*•*****0*****•*****•***0********40******4****0400•.44**4*r*4a*4**4 $406.00 08512 46055 $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00627 $5.96 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 PAGE 0007 DATE 03/21/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT 1NV/REF PO ti CHK 0 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00703 117.50 01030 1507.'7 TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 94 03/13/94 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE $0.00 03.'17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED • 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00529 $7.36 C)1030 46857 TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 94 03/13/94 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1132-4304 00030 $7.36 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 CITY PROSECUTOR /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00720 $14.53 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE_ $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00780 $13.31 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R ' GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00013 001-400-1202-4304 00776 $53.51 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00013 001-400-1203-4304 00788 $36.00 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00711 $92.51 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 94 03/13/94 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00579 315.61 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00013 001-400-1208-4304 00344 $7.63 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01394 $435.20 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00594 $53.43 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 94 03/13/94 FIRE 1 /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00595 $9.51 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00780 $54.20 01030 46857 .TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 PLANNING /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00703 $92.96 01030 46857 TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03/13/94 BUILDING /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/17/94 •. v • • • • • r A• r FINANCE-5FA340 TIME 11:19:48 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CH08/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 03/13/94 001-400-4202-4304 00048 *113.79 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00893 *78.34 03/13/94 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00564 *7.36 03/13/94 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-1204-4304 00099 *73.34 03/13/94 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE 00015 03/13/94 110-400-3302-4304 00796 *59.86 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE R GTEL DED LINE/L. A, ONLINE SYS 92162 R OTEL PHONE REPAIR/POLICE *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0008 DATE 03/21/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *1,249.27 01340 001-400-1206-4304 00713 *181.24 03/07/94 - . . DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2101-4304 92165 03/07/94 POLICE 01396 *454. 36 /TELEPHONE JANICE*GUERRERO WINTER CLASS INSTRUCTOR *** VENDOR TOTAL *635. 60 04331 001-300-0000-3893 04207 *252.00 03/14/94 R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. ST SWEEPER EMERG LITE• 10370 R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. EMERG LITE/TRAF SFTY CAR 10372 R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. •EMERG LITE/PW ADMIN CARS 10371 00731 02/25/94 00731 02/25/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES ********************************* 001-400-3103-4311 00976 ST MAINTENANCE 001-400-3104-4311 00150 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00731 001-400-4202-4311 00293 02/25/94 PUB WKS ADMIN *252. O^ .$162.38 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *328.41 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *149.39 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************il**********M11***********M**k***141*MMAI MS0 R INT'L FIRE CODE INSTITUTE ANNUAL DUES/BLDG DEPT 80977 *640.1E 05638 001-400-4201-4315 00138 *50.00 03/04/94 BUIL.IIING /MEMBERSHIP 01030 46957 *0.00 03/17/94 01030 46857 *0.00 03/17/94 01030 46857 *0.00 03/17/94 01030 46857 *0.00 03/17/94 01030 46857 *0.00 03/17/94 CH92162 07830 *250. 00 CH92165 07832 *450.00 08511 *0. 00 46858 03/17/94 46858 03/17/94 46859 03/17/94 10370 08064 46860 *162.38 03/17/94 1037x. 08066 46060 *324.75 03/17/94 10371 08065 46860 *149.39 03/17/94 80977 07239 *0.00 46861 03/17/94 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 11:19.48 FOR 03/21/94 PAGE 0009 DATE 03/1,'94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $* AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *0* VENDOR TOTAL !.* 1 0 4 0 1 0 1* $ ,0. O" R INTERNATIONAL CONE OF BUILDING 00667 001-400-4201-4316 00333 $70.00 514%::1 07236 46662 CERTIFICATE FEE/SWARTZ 51473 03/15/94 BUILDING /TRAINING $0.00 03/17/94 *0* VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************0*0*40 $70.00 R J C PAPER 03083 001-202-0000-2021 00607 $18.14 80021690 07837 46863 DISCOUNT OFFERED 21690 03/05/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 03/17/94 R J C PAPER 03083 001-202-0000-2022 00600 $18. 14CR 80021690 07837 46863 DISCOUNT TAKEN 21690 03/05/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 30.00 03/17/94 R J C PAPER 03083 001-400-1208-4305 01352 $889.00 80021690 07837 46863 COPIER PAPER/STOCK 21690 03/05/94 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $907.14 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL •** 3889.00 R LA MIRADA THEATRE 05641 001-400-4601-4308 00968 $300.00 08508 46864 TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 03/10/94 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL LACCD SEMINAR REG/R. BLACKWOOD ********** $300.00 05642 001-400-1203-4316 00256 $35.00 08409 46865 03/15/94 PERSONNEL /TRAINING $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 335.00 R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00356 $8,585.50 12570 00073 46866 PARKS MAINT/FEB 94 12578 02/28/94 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/17/94 *0* VENDOR TOTAL $8,585.50 R LOS ANGELES TIMES 00213 001-400-1203-4201 01188 $426.60 09-007927 01041 46867 -EMPLOYEE ADS/FEB 94 07927 02/27/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $426.60 R KAREN*MARTIN 05639 001-210-0000-2110 05659 $50.00 76316 08317 46868 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 76316 03/16/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/17/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010 FOR 03/21/94 DATE 03/21/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # CHV•. $t AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R KAREN*MARTIN 05639 001-300-0000-3895 00163 $6.70CR 76316 08317 46868. ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 76316 03/16/94 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $43.30 R MINUTEMAN PRESS 05592 110-400-3302-4305 01046 $79.05 2056 07766 46869 72 HR TOW -A -WAV CARDS 2056 02/24/94 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *71.05 03/17/94 ••* VENDOR TOTAL *79.05 R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01640 *508.76 9684/9697 01049 46870 REWIND SWEEPER BROOMS /9697 03/01/94 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *508.76 R SEAN*MORRISON 04999 001-300-0000-3893 04209 *383.00 08507 46871 SOFTBALL LEAGUE REFUND 03/10/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL - $383.00 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 001-400-2101-4311 01817 $343.94 13692 01052 46872 PATROL CAR BODY WORK 13692 03/09/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/17/94 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 705-400-1210-4324 00136 $1.480.11 13693 07781 46872 HB7 PATROL CAR BODY WORK 13693 03/09/94 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *2,069.57 03!17!94 r** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************4***W***** $2.824.05 R SHARON Y.*OWINGS 05643 110-400-1204-4316 00011 $181.54 06458 46873 REIMS BOOKS/SPRING 94 03/17/94 FINANCE CASHIER /TRAINING $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL **4r **** 11* 1144* M4***I *181.54 R PEP BOYS 00608 001-400-2101-4311 01816 $13.86 2076236 01056 46874 AUTO PARTS/POLICE-MAR 94 76256 03/07/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *** *A*******4r** 313.86 R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 110-400-1204-4201 00051 $795.30 7448-00 00063 46875 OUT-OF-STATE CITES/JAN94 48-00 03/08/94 FINANCE CASHIER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 03/17/94 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 FOR 03/21/94 DATE 03/21/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $$ AMOUNT INV/REF PO B CHK M DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUN1 UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL R TAMMY*PLANTIKO 05644 110-300-0000-3302 57103 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00393 03/01/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL ** $795. 30 $30.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING $30.00 4600393 06442 46876 $0.00 03/21/94 R THE*PRINT NETWORK 00296 001-400-2101-4305 02176 $205.68 182225/2224 07777 46877 CRIME PREVENTION BOOKLET /2224 03/10/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $205.6H 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *A**N***** $205.6U R RAMONA CROUP SALES 05424 001-400-4601-4201 02194 $216.50 FILE -302 08505 46878 TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP E-302 03/09/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $2.16.50 R BETSY*RUBINO 04966 001-300-0000-3893 04206 $315.00 08510 46879 • WINTER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 03/14/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/17/94 R BETSY*RUBINO 04966 001-300-0000-3893 04208 $231.00 08509 46879 lb WINTER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 03/14/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/17/94 I. R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00181 $1.365.00 94092 08096 46680 • TRAFF ENC SERV/FEB 94 94092 03/01/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAI $0.00 03/17/94 $1.365.00 • R S. A. F. E. R. 03070 001-400-2201-4315 00115 $20.00 06241 46881 • ANN DUES/L. LICKHALTER 03/15/94 FIRE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 03/17/94 $20.00 • **+ VENDOR TOTAL $546.00 *0* VENDOR TOTAL *0* VENDOR TOTAL R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-202-0000-2021 00606 DISCOUNT OFFERED 03/10/94 .. ...'A w 't, •.A ,�•..:`i!Qbti.r.t .. ..r:J.,:: ::.:.�,ir.id- .•. ,•'i r. »0'#'A, i1.;• . . $10.16 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 01061 46882 $0.00 03/17/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 PAGE 0012 DATE 03/21/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-202-0000-2022 00599 DISCOUNT TAKEN $10. 16CR 03/10/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 02812 $498.72 PAINT SUPPLIES/MAR 94 03/10/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL $498.72 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01061 46882 $0.00 03/17/94 01061 46882 $0.00 03/17/94 R SO. BAY CRIMINAL JUSTICE 05102 001-400-2101-4315 00246 $25.00 08209 46883 ANNUAL DUES/V. STRASER 03/15/94 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 03/17/74 *** VENDOR TOTAL $25.00 R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2101-4309 00698 *9.75 26667 01063 46884 FIRE EXTING REPAIR 26667 03/03/94 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/17/+4 *** VENDOR TOTAL M***M* $9.75 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3103-4309 01639 $14.00 009645 01065 46885 TANK RENTAL/FEB 94 09645 02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 03/17/94 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 01153 $14.00 009645 01065 46005 TANK RENTAL/FEB 94 09645 02/28/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 03/17/74 +*+ VENDOR TOTAL **+1 P*11-+**4*******M* $2E. 00 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00482 *11,497.50 ST LITE BILLINGS/FEB 94 02/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL M*******M*M*M*M*MMM*M*R*R*M* $11,497.50 0001.2 *0. 00 46886 03/17/94 R TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION, INC. 03421 001-400-2101-4201 01467 $200.00 1219 00069 46887 COMPUTER TUNING/FEB 94 1219 02/28/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/17/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *200. 00 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2101-4309 00699 $390.38 038074 08203 46888 MED WASTE STORAGE SUPP 38874 03/15/94 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $390.38 03/17/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION r** VENDOR TOTAL R WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS STREET SIGN HARDWARE 49369 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN R AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0013 DATE 03/21/94 INV/REF PO 1* CHK It AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3390. 30 00131 001-400-3104-4309 01174 3625.43 230189/249369 08067 46889 03/04/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3637.77 03/17/94 R WHITMORE, JOHNSON & BOLANOS LEGAL SERV/FEB 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL R***R**4**44*4.4444** 3625.47 03129 001-400-1203-4201 01187 31,170.75 02/28/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH ---- PETTY CASH/3-1-T0-3-16------ R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH -PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 44*4**R4******** 07127 001-400-1202-4307 00702 03/16/94 FINANCE ADMIN 31, 170. 55 325.75 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 07125 001-400-1206-4307 00668 $64.87 03/16/94 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 07125 001-400-1207-4316 00144 03/16/94 BUS LICENSE 05127 001-400-2101-4316 03/16/94 POLICE 320. 00 /TRAINING 01107 315.00 /TRAINING 05125 001-400-2201-4307 00667 39.68 03/16/94 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05125 001-400-2201-4311 00503 313.80 03/16/94--- ------------- FIRE -- -- .. • /AUTO MAINTENANCE 05125 001-400-4101-4305 00721 • 03/16/94 PLANNING *25. 75 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05125 001-400-4601-4308 00969 315.00 03/16/94 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 05125. 001-400-6101-4309 01511 *16.24 03/16/94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 05125 03/16/94 103-400-2601-4309 00989 *2. 17 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 08407 46890 30.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 $0.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30. 00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 *0.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30.00 03/17/94 08316 46891 30.00 03/17/94 :r I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:19:48 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/21/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH 05125 110-400-3302-4305 01045 PETTY CASH/3-1 TO 3-16 03/16/94 PARKING ENF •*• VENDOR TOTAL R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4305 01351. COPIER SUPPLIES /5340 02/07/94 GEN APPRUP **• VENDOR TOTAL •** PAY CODE TOTAL PAGE 0014 DATE 03/21/94 • INV/REF PO N CHK k IIS AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 326. 00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $234.2 08316 $0. 00 $17H 06 17.'1741339/5:140 O8094 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 3578.06 4*** 4**a M* **** M*******Rif**'4a Maa**a*a44*aaa •w* TOTAL WARRANTS******w****************************wM*************M a**********4*.* $578.06 3137, 531. 8:i 3421,361.39 46891 03/17/94 46892 03/17/94 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PACE 'T/Oiff INCLUSIVE. OF THE WARRANT RI:CISl1:R FOR ..._.. 4/01/ _ ARE ACCURATE, FIIND:: ARE AVAIL AIILE ION PAYMCIJ T. AMU ARE III CONFORMANCE 10 IHp B000EE I. %�,�/ BY/WHIINA�JU `7 1 1'IN Jcr URtC I.I (11 DAZE Y a .fl I • • • A FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION A-1 COAST RENTALS TRENCHER RENT/CLARK FLD 79950 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00029 001-400-6101-4309 03/02/94 PARKS PAGE 0001 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01516 *243.30 179950 00101 46895 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 03/24/94 R ALEX THEATRE TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP *** VENDOR TOTAL *243. 30 05596 001-400-4601-4201 02200 $290.00 03/20/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R JEREMY*ALLRED CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 01475 *** VENDOR TOTAL 05645 110-300-0000-3302 03/17/94 $250.00 57398 $17.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN -CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00238 03/24/94 00238 03/24/94 00238 03/24/94 00238 03/24/94 $17.00 001-400-1212-4188 02980 $824. 10 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 105-400-2601-4188 01619 *36.81 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 109-400-3301-4188 00521 $1.44 DNTN ENHANC COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 110-400-1204-4188 00251 $49.18 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 110-400-3302-4188 01885 03/24/94 PARKING ENF 00238 160-400-3102-4188 01597 03/24/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00238 705-400-1209-4188 00848 03/24/94 LIABILITY INS 00238 705-400-1217-4188 00953 03/24/94 WORKERS COMP $85.57 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $26.73 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.78 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *7. 17 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MARCH 94 $1,035.80 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00326 $940.98 03/18/94 MEDIANS /UTILITIES 08527 46896 *0.00 03/24/94 6201475 06445 46897 $0.00 03/24/94 00041 $0.00 46898 03/24/94 00041 46898 $0.00 03/24/94 00041 46898 *0. 00 03/24/94 • 00041 46898 $0.00 03/24/94 00041 46898 $0.00 03/24/94 00041 46898 $0.00 03/24/94 00041 46898 $0.00 03/24/94 00041 46898 $0.00 03/24/94 01011 46899 $0.00 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 PAGE 0002 DATE 03/28/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN W AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00763 *382.12 01011 46899 WATER BILLINGS/MARCH 94 03/18/94 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 03/24/94 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00569 $1,500.08 01011 46899 WATER BILLINGS/MARCH 94 03/18/94 PARKS /UTILITIES *0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *2, 423. 18 R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00468 *40,000.00 08411 46900 SETTLEMENT/CEIST 03/28/94 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *0.00 03/28/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *40,000.00 R COLEN AND LEE 04715 705-400-1209-4201 00445 *1,470.00 00042 46901 LIABILITY ADMIN/APR 94 03/24/94 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $1,470.00 R COMMUNICATION SUPPORT CORP. 02800 001-400-1207-4201 00063 *400.00 93010.005 08532 46902 SERV/FRANCHISE RENEWAL 0.005 03/09/94 CABLE TV /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *400. 00 R STUART*COOPER 05648 110-300-0000-3302 57395 *20.00 6103232 06435 46903 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 03232 03/17/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *20. 00 R DAYS INN 05660 001-400-2101-4313 00473 *149.85 HOTEL/STC TRNG/B. PIERCE 0$0.0 46904/ 03/21/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *149. 85 R PHILLIP*DEBLINGER 05652 001-300-0000-3893 04220 *30.00 74016 08515 46905 -SPRING CLASS REFUND 74016 03/14/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *30. 00 R DICTAPHONE, INC. 02855 001-400-2101-4307 02167 *180.78 S324475 08207 46906 REPAIR DISPATCH CABLES 24475 03/15/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $175.00 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL R DOROTHY*DUNCAN COMM RES TRIP REFUND www VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE. 0003 DATE 03/28/94. INV/REF PO * CHK If AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $180.78 • 05654 001-400-4601-4201 02199 $23.00 75330 03/21/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY COPIER MAINT/FEB 94 $23.00 75330 08531 46907 $0.00 03/24/94 02840 001-400-1208-4201 01113 3314.00 006M71491 01025 46908 71491 03/06/94 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY COPIER METER USE/JAN 94 71491 w•w VENDOR TOTAL 02840 001-400-1208-4201 01114 03/06/94 $306.46 006M71491 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN CITU HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN CITU HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 FOUNDATION, HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN CITU HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN • CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL..94 FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN .CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 www VENDOR TOTAL *620.46 04963 001-400-1212-4188 02981 $9,598.41 03/24/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 105-400-2601-4188 01616 $120.24 03/24/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 109-400-3301-4188 00522 $30.06 03/24/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 110-400-1204-4188 00252 • 3400.75 03/24/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 110-400-3302-4188 01886 $200.35 03/24/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 160-400-3102-4188 01598 $170.32 03/24/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 170-400-2103-4188 00546 $349.66 03/24/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 705-400-1217-4188 00954 $100.19 03/24/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE w.vrAY'nMq111 }r7 7 ,94.rr; $10.969.98 00059 001-400-1202-4316 00485 $20.00 03/22/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 01025 46908 $0.00 03/24/94 00056 46909 $0.00 03/24/94 00056 46909 $0.00 03/24/94 00056 46909 $0.00 03/24/94 00056 46909 $0.00 03/24/94 00056 46909 30. 00 03/24/94 00056 46909 30. 00 03/24/94 00036 46909 $0.00 03/24/94 00056 46909 $0.00 03/24/94 07844 46910 $0.00 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16: 47: 10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •0* VENDOR TOTAL R KATE*GREINER SPRING CLASS REFUND 74013 4,4,• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $20.00 07670 001-300-0000-3893 04215 $20.00 74013 08514 03/14/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED • FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED - FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00631 03/23/94 CITY COUNCIL 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00707 03/23/94 CITY CLERK 00015 03/23/94 001-400-1131-4304 00533 CITY ATTORNEY 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00724 03/23/94 CITY TREASURER 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00784 03/23/94 CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00780 03/23/94 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00792 03/23/94 PERSONNEL *20.00 $0.48 /TELEPHONE $O. 71 /TELEPHONE $0.40 /TELEPHONE $4.37 /TELEPHONE $4.98 /TELEPHONE $7. 12 /TELEPHONE $6.23 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00717 $49.67 03/23/94 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 001-400-1207-43041 00793 BUS LICENSE 00017 03/23/94 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01401 03/23/94 POLICE 00017 001-400-2201-4304 00796 03/23/94 FIRE R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 03/23/94 001-400-4101-4304 00784 PLANNING $6.76 /TELEPHONE $264.30 /TELEPHONE $17. 99 /TELEPHONE *5.71 /TELEPHONE 46911 03/24/94 04030 46912 $0.00 03/24/94 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 *0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 40. 00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 46912 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/PRIVATE LINES/MAR 94 *It* VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00852 $65. 15 03/23/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00897 $9.72 03/23/94 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 ♦w• VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0005 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3443. 59 02623 001-400-1212-4188 02982 $3,133.43 03/24/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 105-400-2601-4188 01617 $21.29 03/24/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 109-400-3301-4188 00523 33.97 03/24/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-1204-4188 00253 $122.07 03/24/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01887 03/24/94 PARKING ENF 02623 155-400-2102-4188 01001 03/24/94 CROSSING GUARD 02623 160-400-3102-4188 01599 03/24/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN $23.54 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 35. 65 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $29.31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 170-400-2103-4188 00547 $41.42 03/24/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00849 $33.72 03/24/94 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00955 $50.28 03/24/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 r • i 00241 001-400-1212-4188 02984 03/24/94 EMP BENEFITS $3,464.46 $19,307.96 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01030 46912 $0.00 03/24/94 01030 46912 30. 00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 30.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 30.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00001 46913 $0.00 03/24/94 00016 $0.00 46914 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00241 105-400-2601-4188 01619 $973. 14 03/24/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 03/24/94 00241 03/24/94 00241 03/24/94 00241 03/24/94 110-400-1204-4188 00255 $748.18 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 110-400-3302-4188 01889 PARKING ENF 155-400-2102-4188 01002 CROSSING GUARD 160-400-3102-4188 01601 SEWER/ST DRAIN $1,464.98 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $25. 09 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *508. 24 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 170-400-2103-4188 00549 $145.28 03/24/94 SPEC INVESTCTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 705-400-1209-4188 00850 $176.94 03/24/94 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 705-400-1217-4188 00956 $176.94 03/24/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R HERMOSA BCH CITY SCHOOL DIST. FIELD USE/MAINT-APR 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02066 001-400-6101-4231 00033 03/24/94 PARKS PAGE 0006 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $23,526.75 $500. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS/MAR 94 •** VENDOR TOTAL $500.00 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00359 $9,652.12 03/17/94 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY HP SOFTWARE MAINT/MAR 94 01K63 •** VENDOR TOTAL *9,652. 12 00016 46914 $0.00 03/24/94 00016 46914 $0.00 03/24/94 00016 46914 $0. 00 03/24/94 00016 46914 *0. 00 03/24/94 00016 46914 $0.00 03/24/94 00016 46914 *0.00 03/24/94 00016 46914 $0.00 03/24/94 00016 46914 $0.00 03/24/94 00074 46915 $0.00 03/24/94 08410 *0. 00 00149 001-400-1206-4201 01256 *701.34 9701K63 00032 03/02/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 R HOLLYWOOD BOWL TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP $701.34 46916 03/24/94 46917 03/24/94 04642 001-400-4601-4201 02201 $124.20 14-52103 08523 46918 52103 03/20/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP, INC. PD COMP SYS MAINT/MAR 94 -0394 R INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP, INC. MAC PC MAINT/MAR 94 -0394 R INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP, INC. PD COMP SYS MAINT/MAR 94 -0394 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ' 05254 001-400-2101-4201 03/01/94 POLICE 05254 001-400-2101-4201 03/01/94 POLICE 05254 001-400-2201-4201 03/01/94 FIRE PAGE 0007 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $124.20 01474 $477.80 306835-0394 00077 46919 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 01475 $274.00 308834-0394 00080 46919 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 00465 3307.20 306833-0394 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT OFFERED R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 00604 $7. 00CR 02458 001-202-0000-2021 03/23/94 02458 001-202-0000-2022 03/23/94 31, 037. 00 00611 $7.00 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN /DISCOUNTS TAKEN R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00991 $343.93 ELEC SUPPLIES/ST LITE9 03/23/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS •** VENDOR TOTAL R SUE*LEE SPRING CLASS REFUND 75434 **• VENDOR TOTAL 05657 001-300-0000-3893 03/20/94 *343.93 00077 46919 $0.00 03/24/94 01037 46920 $0.00 03/24/94 01037 46920 $0.00 03/24/94 01037 46920 30. 00 03/24/94 04218 $35.00 75434 08521 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 R LINDA*LIEBERMAN 05649 SPRING CLASS REFUND 73994 001-300-0000-3893 04216 $43.00 73994 08313 03/14/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 $35.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL R DENNIS*LINDSEY SOFTBALL LEAGUE DIRECTOR *** VENDOR TOTAL $43. 00 03708 001-400-4601-4221 00412 $2,423.30 03/21/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR R MAC WAREHOUSE MAC PC SUPPLIES/MAR 94 05411 03810 001-400-2101-4303 03/13/94 POLICE $2,423.50 46921 03/24/94 46922 03/24/94 08520 46923 $0.00 03/24/94 02162 $293.00 112423/103411 01043 46924 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/24/94 • lb FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0008 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *293. 00 R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 001-400-2101-4311 01821 *38.00 CITY CAR WASHES/NOV 93 03/14/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 001-400-4101-4311 00190 *3.80 CITY CAR WASHES/NOV 93 03/14/94 PLANNING /AUTO MAINTENANCE •w• VENDOR TOTAL R MASCO TECH 05617 001-400-6101-4309 01717 REPAIR CLARK SCOREBOARD 13796 03/16/94 PARKS *** VENDOR TOTAL *41. 80 01045 46925 *0. 00 03/24/94 01045 46925 *0. 00 03/24/94 $119.15 T13796 08085 46926 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *119.50 03/24/94 *119. 15 R BETTY*MEDLICOTT 07656 001-400-4601-4201 02197 *23.00 74082 08528 46927 COMM RES TRIP REFUND 74082 03/21/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *23. 00 R SUSAN*MEENAM SPRING CLASS REFUND 75433 05651 001-300-0000-3893 04219 *60.00 75433 08516 46928 03/14/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *60. 00 R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02985 *162.00 CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 03/24/94 0$0.0 46929/ EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $162.00 R BESSIESNELSON 05655 001-400-4601-4201 02198 $23.00 COMM RES TRIP REFUND 74081 03/21/94 74081 08529 346930 /24/ COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $23.00 R OVERBYTE COMPUTERS 04739 001-400-1206-5402 00094 $1,906.74 PC NETWORK PARTS 83268 03/24/94 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -MORE THAN *500 83268 04070 $2,041.74 46931 03/24/94 / 6 41. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 PAGE 0009 DATE 03/28/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R OVERBYTE COMPUTERS 04739 001-400-1206-7402 00095 1111,644.50 81283/83333 04065 46931 EXCEL/WORD-NETWORK SFTWR 83333 03/24/94 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -MORE THAN 0500 $11,474.50 03/28/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $13,551.24 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 01400 $145.20 COMPUTER HOOKUPS/PD/MAR 03/19/94 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00036$ 46932 $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 3145. 20 R BONNIE*PIERCE 04898 001-400-2101-4313 00472 $84.00 MEALS/STC TRAINING 03/21/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL $84. 00 08134 46933 $0.00 03/24/94 R POWER MAINTENANCE CORPORATION 02980 001-400-2101-4201 01476 01,410.00 PHONE ALARM MAINT/93-94 03/21/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 068 $0400 03/24//94 R POWER MAINTENANCE CORPORATION 02980 001-400-2201-4201 00466 $940.00 PHONE ALARM MAINT/93-94 03/21/94 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT0$03 f0..0 /244 00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-2101-4305 02163 CABLES/POLICE 37955 03/16/94 POLICE *** VENDOR TOTAL $2,350.00 $14.06 837955 01058 46935 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/24/94 $14. 06 R COUNTY OF*RIVERSIDEI 02352 001-400-2101-4313 00474 TUITION/STC TRNG/PIERCE E 50 03/24/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXP$58.ENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL R SYLVIA*ROOT !'MINUTES SEC/3-15-94 315 R SYLVIA*ROOT 04061 109-400-3301-4201 00241 MINUTES SEC/3-16-94 316 03/21/94 '172.70 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00454 03/17/94 PLANNING COMM $58.50 08137 46936 *0. 00 03/28/94 $168.75 315 05863 46937 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 316 08616 46937 $0. 00 03/24/94 • • • 0 a 1 • 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •*• VENDOR TOTAL R ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CLARK FIELD LIOHTBULBS 14282 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 05613 001-400-6101-4309 02/28/94 PARKS PAGE 0010 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO M CHK $ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $341.25 01714 $913.63 4364-14282 08068 46938 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $913.63 03/24/94 •*• VENDOR TOTAL R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 •*• VENDOR TOTAL $913.63 04398 001-400-1212-4188 02983 $818.89 03/24/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 107-400-2601-4188 01618 $60.27 03/24/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 110-400-1204-4188 00234 $23.88 03/24/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS 04398 110-400-3302-4188 01888 $142.41. 03/24/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 160-400-3102-4188 01600 $38.99 03/24/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 170-400-2103-4188 00948 $11.94 03/24/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R STEVE*SAMPSEL CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00740 •*• VENDOR TOTAL R $1,096.36 00019 46939 $0.00 03/24/94 00019 46939 *0.00 03/24/94 00019 46939 *0.00 03/24/94 00019 46939 $0.00 03/24/94 00019 46939 $0.00 03/24/94 00019 46939 $0.00 03/24/94 05647 110-300-0000-3302 57396 $120.00 7102178/700740 06443 46940 03/17/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/24/94 HENRY*SCHELLHORN 07662 110-300-0000-3843 03/21/94 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 76603 24466 (27.00 /PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL •*• VENDOR TOTAL $120.00 R CHERIE*SCHOKMAN 05659 001-300-0000-3893 SPRING CLASS REFUND 74042 03/20/94 $27.00 76603 06439 $0.00 46941 03/24/94 04217 $37.00 74042 08525 46942 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *0* VENDOR TOTAL R SHORELINE PRINTING BUS CARDS/POLICE R SHORELINE PRINTING BUILDING PERMIT FORMS 10332 03/21/94 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD K ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0011 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO 0 CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $35.00 03505 001-400-2101-430 02164 *81.19 10302 02/16/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 03305 001-400-4201-4305 00929 *746.93 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY COFFEE SUPPLIES/COUNCIL 17039 ••• VENDOR TOTAL *828. 12 10302 07787 46943 *81. 19 03/24/94 10332 07240 46943 *746.93 03/24/94 00114 001-400-1101-4303 00530 *86.21 5217039 01062 46944 03/07/94 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *0.00 03/24/94 R PAM+SMITH BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 73443 ••• VENDOR TOTAL 07661 001-300-0000-3117 06480 03/16/94 *86. 21 *123. 00 /BUSINESS LICENSE R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE SURCHARGE/FEB 94 ••• VENDOR TOTAL 00118 110-300-0000-3302 77397 03/16/94 *123.00 $17,837.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MARCH 94 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MARCH 94 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MARCH 94 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MARCH 94 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MARCH 94 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00327 03/18/94 MEDIANS 317, 837. 00 $109.83 /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00192 *737.70 03/18/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00764 03/18/94 BLDG MAINT 00179 001-400-6101.-4303 00570 03/18/94 PARKS $7,565.81 /UTIL.ITIES I. 311. 61 /UTILITIES 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00484 $233.88 03/18/94 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 73443 04373 46947 $0.00 03/24/94 06456 46946 *0. 00 03/24/94 01065 46947 $0.00 03/24/94 01065 46947 $0.00 03/24/94 01065 46947 $0.00 03/24/94 01.063 46947 $0.00 03/24/94 01065 46947 $0.00 03/24/94 • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MARCH 94 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00261 $86.20 03/18/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHWEST REGIONAL TRAINING TUITION/B. VINCENT *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE. 0012 DATE 03/28/94 1NV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $10,066.83 01909 001-400-2101-4312 02258 $223.00 03/21/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST R CORTLAND*SPRING CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00088 *** VENDOR TOTAL $223.00 01065 $0. 00 46947 03/24/94 08133 46948 $0. 00 03/24/94 05646 110-300-0000-3302 57399 $20.00 7600088 06444 46949 03/17/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/24/94 R SOUEEKERS & HERB STAFF UNIFORMS/COMM RES 1489 *** VENDOR TOTAL *20. 00 03480 001-400-4601-4308 00972 $250.10 03/22/94 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS R TOXGUARD ANTIFREEZE/STORAGE DRUMS 2524 **• VENDOR TOTAL $250. 10 05627 001-400-4205-4309 00784 $212.81 03/16/94 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 'CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 $212.81 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02986 $855.26 03/24/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 105-400-2601-4188 01620 $18.19 03/24/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 109-400-3301-4188 00524 $1.91 03/24/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 110-400-1204-4188 00256 $24.51 03/24/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 110-400-3302-4188 01890 $43.08 03/24/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1489 07765 46950 *370.26 03/24/94 2524 08079 *212. 81 46951 03/24/94 00029 46952 $0.00 03/24/94 00029 46952 $0.00 03/24/94 00029 46952 $0.00 03/24/94 00029 46952 $0. 00 03/24/94 00029 46952 $0.00 03/24/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:47:10 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH IN9/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/28/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00240 155-400-2102-4188 01003 *1.08 03/24/94 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 160-400-3102-4188 01602 *14.76 03/24/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 170-400-2103-4188 00550 *21.60 03/24/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00851 *4.66 03/24/94 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00957 *5. 81 03/24/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R UARCO, INCORPORATED REPAIR COMP FORM BURSTER 91451 *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0013 DATE 03/28/94 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *990. 86 00029 46952 $0.00 03/24/94 00029 46952 $0.00 03/24/94 00029 46952 *0. 00 03/24/94 00029 46952 *0.00 03/24/94 00029 46952 *0. 00 03/24/94 00126 001-400-1206-4201 01258 *312.86 891451 04082 46953 03/10/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $304.49 03/24/94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 eY •312. 86 03790 001-400-1212-4188 02979 *1,834.50 03/24/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 105-400-2601-4188 01614 *128.96 03/24/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 109-400-3301-4188 00520 *5.69 03/24/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 110-400-1204-4188 00250 *120.25 03/24/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 110-400-3302-4188 01884 *201.62 03/24/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 160-400-3102-4188 01596 $73.47 03/24/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 705-400-1209-4188 00847 *18.75 03/24/94 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 46954 $0.00 03/24/94 00022 46954 *0. 00 03/24/94 00022 46954 *0. 00 03/24/94 00022 46954 *0. 00 03/24/94 00022 46954 *0. 00 03/24/94 00022 46954 $0.00 03/24/94 00022 46954 *0.00 03/24/94 • u s CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA34O DEMAND LIST PAGE 0014 y TIME 16:47:10 FOR 03/28/94 DATE 03/28/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 0 CHK N •. DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT.DESCRIPTION R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00952 $24.42 CITY HEALTH INS/APRIL 94 03/24/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL $2,407.66 R UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 04768 001-400-1206-4201 01257 $1,080.00 COMPUTER SYS MAINT/APR94 9946 03/24/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL •************* **************+FntFn********* ******************tFnte*trnte $1.080.00 R OFCR WILLIAM*VINCENT 02251 001-400-2101-4312 02259 $40.00 MEALS/P. O. S. T. CLASS 03/21/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************n*n****Mn*****n*n*n*******n*n*AM**** $40.00 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00022 46954 $0.00 03/24/94 9946 00009 46955 $0.00 03/24/94 08132 46956 $0.00 03/24/94 R VIRCO MANUFACTURING 05663 001-400-2201-5401 00099 $433.00 06297 46957 FOLDING KITCHEN TABLE 03/22/94 FIRE /EQUIP—LESS THAN $500 $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************M******************n***n*n*** $433.00 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4201 01115 $366. 15 040974966 00007 46958 METER VSE/MAINT—FEB 94 74966 03/07/94 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $366.15 R TRACY*NATES 04268 001-400-4202-4316 00300 $25.92 08611 46959 REIMB BOOK/SPRING 94 03/16/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *0.00 03/24/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL *** PAY CODE TOTAL *** TOTAL WARRANTS *25. 92 $154,933.95 $154,933.95 1 HEREBY CFRTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIIIS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LIS rI'I) ON PACTS TO ./ IN CI.0 `'•IV E, OF THE WARRANT I(LGI'i I! R r(7,: ._ 1/..4/?(/ !J <F ACCURAFE, FUNI S APP. AVAT All f rCI: t"•, i l: III. Ai 3 Ai7L IN CONFORMANCE IU Il l I<UI?' f. BY _ DATE FINANCE U11<L(; I UR a FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0001 DATE 04/04/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP DATA TICKET, INC, 046®1 .. _.__y._.__......_.._-- PMT 1 /CITE SOFTWARE '" ` �" - 037309'4 H DATA TICKET, INC. 04689 SUPPLIES/NEW CITE SYSTEM 00i-400=1206-5402 00098 $20,297.50 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 110-400-3302-4305 01050 $3,249.80 03/30/94 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R ACADEMY OF JUSTICE TUITION/M. WRIGHT $23,547.30 $23,547.30 00083 46960 $0.00 03/31/94 00083. . _.. _46960_ .._ _. $0.00 03/31/94 05685 001-400-2101-4313 41030 - 03/09/94 1 POLICE 00478 $28.05 9-941030 08136 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC ' $0. 00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $28.05 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 94 00935 001-400-2101-4201 01480 $2.381.50 13200 . 03/25/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 94 13200 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 94 00935 001-400-2201-4201 00469 03/25/94 FIRE $205. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00935 110-400-3302-4307 00111 $239.50 13101 03/25/94 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MS DIAN H.*ALLISON CYTATION PMT REFUND $2, 826. 00 46964 03/31/94 13200 00048 46965 $0.00 03/31/94 13200 00048 46965 $0.00 03/31/94 13101 00058 46965 $0.00 03/31/94 05682 110-300-0000-3302 04663 03/23/94 57603 $52.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $52. 00 R AMERICAN EAGLE 3604663 06463 46966 ..J N 3 ..4 11 $0.00 03/31/94 BUS/COMM RES TRIP 03118 145-400-3409-4201 00117 $300.00 03/24/94 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT _*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $300.00 08544 46967 $0.00 03/31/94 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS PRISONER MEAL57MAR 94 8350 00857 001-400-2101-4306 0722/94 POLICE 01524 $71.75 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 8350 00105 46968 $0.00 03/31/94 tal • 6 O • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002 TIME 11:27:02 FOR 04/04/94 DATE 04/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $71. 75 R BLUEPRINT SERVICE & SUPPLY CO. 03190 001-400-1208-4305 01355 $25.98 96389 05862 46969 MAPS/ZONING & GEN PLAN - 96389 03/10/94 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $25.98 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $25.98 R JOAN*DOTAISH ' 05667 001-300-0000-3893 04389 $30.00 77607 08540 46970 SPRING CLASS'REFUND 77607 03/24/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30.00 R BRUCE*BROWN_ _ _ 05687 00 1-210-0000-2110 05667 $250.00 75557 08321 46971 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 75557 03/28/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $250.00 R DEAN*CALTOGIRONE_ 05618 110-300-0000-3302 57605 $142.00 984168/9.86287 06453 46972 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 86287 03/22/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $142.00 R STEPHEN*CARLS0N 05674 110-300-0000-3302 57595 $20.00 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00513 03/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 7000513 06446____ 46973 $0.00 03/31/94 R JEAN-LOUIS*CENTENO 05677 110-300-0000-3302 , 57598 $60.00 7700741 06454.___ 46974 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00741 03/22/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $60.00 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01827 $537.42 01013_-__ 46975 PARTS/POLICE VEHICLES 03/31/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/31/94 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET PARTS/ANIMAL CONT TRUCK 00014 001-400-2401-4311 00330 $254.80 01013 46975 03/31/94 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/31/94 ,.: • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0003. FOR 04/04/94 DATE 04/04/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-3101-4311 00076 $23.43 PARTS/MEDIANS-VEHICLE 01013 03/31/94 MEDIANS /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $815.65 $0. 00 46975 03/31/94 R ROBERT*CONREY 05668 001-300-0000-3893 04390 $65.00 75586 08541 46976 SPRING CLASS REFUNb 75586 03/24/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $65. 00 R STUART*COOPER 05648 110-300-0000-3302 57606 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 03279 03/22/94 $20.00 6103279 06451 46977 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 R D. A. R. E. AMERICA 03530 001-400-2101-4305 02171 $171.66 D.A.R.E. SCHOOL SUPPLIES 71346 03/10/94 210004 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $171. 66 $0.00 03/31/94 71346 07788 46978 $171.66 03/31/94 R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-2101-4311 01826 $147.76 01019 46979 TIRES%POLICE VEHICLE 03/31/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/31/94 R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-3103-4311 00978 $335.54 01019 46979 TIRES/ST MAINT VEHICLE 03/31/94 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/31/94 R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 160-400-3102-4311 00254 $167.77 01019 46979 03/31/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/31/94 TIRES/SEWER-TRUCK *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $651. 07 J J • 1 s. 1n • 12 1,1 • 1,1 i J J .?7 J v. 31 J 17 R J. F. *DAVIDSON ASSOC., INC. 05355 125-400-8506-4201 00041 $1,499.00 37732/37833 08035 46980 VALLEY PARK RENOVATION --37833 027T4/94 PRK, REC IMPROV/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE $1,850.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1, 499. 00 R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE L. SHELTER COSTS7FEB 94 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00240 $108.10 0372 7 4 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00014 $0.00 46981 03/31/94 • • V ,> J r1 • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0004 -� DATE 04/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3108. 10 AMY M.*DUNN 05688 001-300-0000-3893 04395 $20.00 73979 08533_ 46982 SPRING CLASS REFUND 73979 03/23/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 320. 00 AMY*DYSTRA 05675 110-300-0000-3302._ 57596 $20.00 -_-_ 7701225 06450 46983 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 01225 03/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • $20.00 R FARO*EDWARDS 05676 110-300-0000-3302 57597 320.00 I 4500439 06452_._ 46984 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00439 03/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 R ROBERT*ELLING 05686 001-210-0000-2110 05669 $50.00 73094 08319 46985 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 73094 03/28/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/31/94 j R ROBERT*ELLING 05686 001-300-0000-3895 00166 317.70CR 73094 08319 46985 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 73094 03/28/94 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $32.30 R EMMA CORPORATION 05181 115-202-0000-2020 00101 $47,050.05 08615 46986 50% RETENTION RELEASE 03/03/94 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $47,050.05 R JOHN*GILLANDER 05671 110-300-0000-3302 57592 $20.00 6103280 06447 46987 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 03280 03/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING 30.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00013 001-400-2101-4304 01405 $442.07 01030 46988 PRIVATE LINES/MARCH 94 03/31/94 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/31/94 • 0 J • 4P Q � ti %. 'I 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0005 DATE 04/04/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R OTA CALIFORNIA, INCORPORAt D 00015 PRIVATE LINES/MARCH 94. --""--._.a -- 03/31/94- 001-400-4204-4321 3/31794- GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 PRIVATE LINES/MARCH 94 ---03/31%94 001-400-4204-4321 00767 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4601-4304 00899 $33. 86 /DUItDINO 9AFETP7SECURIT $46. 07 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GTEL RCC EGUIP.RENT/MAR 94 01340 03/22/94 $522. 00 001-400-2101-4304 01404 $51.56 POLICE /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************apt******************************* MARIA 8.*HANSSONLIN PARKING PERMIT REFUND • $51.56 01030 46988 $0.00 03/31/94 _ 01030 46988 $0.00 03/31/94 01033 46969 $0.00 03/31/94 05684 110-300-0000-3843 24647 $27.00 78809 06981 46990 78809 03/16/94 /PARKING PERMITS: ANNUAL $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $27. 00 R HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC. 04108 705-400-1217-4201 00182 $8,000.00 --WORK COMP ADMIN/APR-JUN 03/21/94 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8,000.00 00044 46991 $0.00-03/31/94 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS/MAR •94 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00361 $3,587.65 03/22/94 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,587.65 08412 46992 $0.00 03/31/94 to''" R HOZIES RADIATOR SERVICE_ RECORE RADIATOR/HB-2 94896 00277 001-400-2101-4311 01828 $172.93 03/15/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $172.93 94896 08208 46993 $173.93 03/31/94 51 R JOHN L.*HUNTER & ASSOC., INC. STORMWATER SERVICES 05356 160-400-8302-4201 00009 $2,980.00 03/28/94 CIP 87-302 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,980.00 07333 _46994_ $3,725.00 03/31/94 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00614 i • " DISCOUNT OFFERED $2.51 03/31/94 01037 46995 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 03/31/94 51 57 71 ..r • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 11:27'02 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0006 DATE 04/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # I• DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _.. _. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00607_ $2. 51CR • 01037.____46995._ _.__-_—. DISCOUNT TAKEN 03/31/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 03/31/94 I� R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00994.__._________$123,__38 01037 46995 MISC ELEC SUPP/ST LITES 03/31/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/31/94 r *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $123.38 INTERTEC COMPUTER SERVICES 01740 001-400-1206-4201 01262 3637.50 _ _ _00078_ _46996 PRINTER MAINT/APR—JUN 94 03/28/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $637.50 R MS TERA L. *KAUTZ 05683 110-300-0000-3302 57604 $30.004600201. 06464 _.46997 CITATION PMT REFUND 00201 03/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 L. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30.00 i., R DIANA*KELLY 05680 _ 110-300-0000_3302 57601 _ _ 3280.,.00_.____._ 7101647.._.06460 .. 46998 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 01647 03/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $280.00 — R— GLENN*KOEHR 05679 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00801 03/23/94 110-300-00 00-3302 57600 $50.00 6000801_ 06459.._—. 46999 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 $0.00 03/31/94 L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITAN 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00185 $752.00 CR -30895 06455 - 47000 — - BUS PASS SALES/MARCH 94 30895 03/21/94 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $752.00 R LOS ANGELES DODGERS TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 05555 001-400-4601-4201 02216 $600.00 08519 47001 03/31/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $600.00 R DENISE*LOVERSKY 05681 110-300-0000-3302 57602 $20.00 7700188 06461 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 00188 03/22/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 ie J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0007 DATE 04/04/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 820. 00 1I R MANHATTAN FORD PARTS/BUS LIC VEHICLE MANHATTAN FORD PARTS/MEDIANS--TRUCK R MANHATTAN FORD PARTS/ST MAINT TRUCK R MANHATTAN FORD PARTS/ST LITE TRUCK 00605 001-40.0-1207-4311 0008.2 03/31/94 BUS LICENSE 00605 001-400-3101-4311 00077 03701794 MEDIANS 00605 001-400-3103-4311 00979 03/31/94 ST MAINTENANCE 00605 105-400=2601-4311 00349 3133. 70 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 821. 36 01046 47003 30.00 03/31/94 01046 47003 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 318. 40 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 817. 85 03/31/94 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************************tr** R REBECCA*MARCELLO SPRING CLASS REFUND 05666 001-300-0000-3893 74079 03/23/94 8191_31 30.00 03/31/94 01046 47003 30.00 03/31/94 01046 47003 80.00 03/31/94 04388 855.00 74079 08535 47004 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 80.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GLEN*MARTIN SPRING CLASS REFUND 05670 001-300-0000-3893 75365 03/24/94 855. 00 04392 360.00 75365 08543 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 30.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************' 360. 00 R MARX BROTHERS SEMI-ANNUAL HOOD TESTING 12640 47005 03/31/94 03183 001-400-4204-4321 00768 3187.50 112640 08090 47006 03/08/94 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 3187.50 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************;u************ 3187. 50 03/31/94 ' 0 11 Q I." R SEAN*MORRISON FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 75309 04999 001-210-0000-2110 03/28/94 05668 850.00 75309 08322 47007 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 30.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MUNICIPAL TOY COMPANY 350. 00 COMM RES EASTER EGG HUNT 94665 01517 001-400-4601-4308 00974 3323.00 94665 08502 47008 , 03/08/94 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 8323.00 03/31/94 11 • • FINANCE-5FA340 TIME 11:27:02 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0008 DATE 04/04/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION . _,____ ._. __. ..AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** MARION*NICHOLSON COMM RES TRIP REFUND $323.00 75510 0,653 001-400-4601-4201 02218 . _ _75510 08530 03/21/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $23.00 OLIVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERVICES/FEB 94 R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERVICES/FEB 94 R OLIVER, BARR &.VOSE LEGAL SERVICES/FEB 94 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00839 $12,916.25 02/28/94 47009 03/31/94 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 07419 47010 $0.00 03/31/94 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00840 $4,666.50 07419 47010 02/28/94 420001 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 02892 001-400-1205-4201 _00065- ..______.$787,.59________'..______.. 07419.- . .47010 02/28/94 CABLE TV /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18,370.25 R PACTEL CELLULAR -.LA MOBILE PHONE CHGS/MAR 94 03209 170-400-2103-4304 00131 $226.36 03/31/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TELEPHONE .1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $226. 36 01053 $0. 00 47011 03/31/94 PAGENET PAGING SERVICE/APR 94 68058 R PAGENET PAGING SERVICE/APR 94 68058 PAGENET PAGING SERVICE/APR 94 68058 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00200 $11.00 A268058 00049 47012 03/31/94 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 02487 001-400-1203-4201 01192 $11.00 A268058 00049 R PAGENET PAGING SERVECE//APR 94 68058 R PAGENET PAGING SERVICE/APR 94 68058 R PAGENET 03/31/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0. 00 47012 03/31/94 02487 001-400-1206-4201 01263 $11.00 A268058 00049 47012 03/31/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 02487 001-400-2101-4201 01481 $199.00 A268058 00049 03/31/94 POLICE 02487 001-400-2401-4201 00420 03/31/94 ANIMAL CONTROL 02487' 001-400-4202-4201 00439 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0. 00 $11.00 A268058 00049 PAGING SERVICE/APR 94 68058 03/31/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 47012 03/31/94 47012 03/31/94 $110.00 A268058 00049 47012 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 FOR 04/04/94 DATE 04/04/94 • PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK 3 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . _ • ftA0tNET 02487 001-400-4601-4201 02217 1022.00 A268058 00049_ 47012. PAGING SERVICE/APR-94----68058 03/31744 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 80.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 8375.00 !..I %., . , _ *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 860.00 ,: - taw R VALERIE*PEARSON 05689 001-300-0000-3893 04393 850.00 75596 08534 47014 : ....: I ' SPRING CLASS REFUND 75596 03/23/94 i /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 80.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 850.00 I R ANNETTE*PAYNE 05672 110-300-0000-3302 57593 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 01195 03/22/94 860.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING I ILO • 7401195 06448 47013 ‘, 80.00 03/31/94 " I I PAUL*PEASE 05669 001-300-0000-3893 04391 830.00 74012 08542 47015 - SPRING CLASS REFUND 74012 03/24/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 80.00 03/31/94 1,1 ,,.... TOTAL ******************************************************************** 830.00 •:1 R ,,, • *** VENDOR . _ erHiLYNN*PEAVEY FINGERPRINTING SUPPLIES 4st , IJ6 • lio • • *** VENDOR - - - - - - 04371 001-400-2101-4305 02170 8418.65 03/15/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES TOTAL ******************************************************************** 8418.65 07759 47016 8452.20 03/31/94 ' • R LORRAINE*PLUMMER 05658 001-300-0000-3893 04394 835.00 77609 08522 47017 SPRING CLASS REFUND 77609 03/20/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 80.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 835.00 • • • R READ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 05634 001-400-1206-5401 00028 81,735.25 2112 04084 47018 NETWORK SOFTWARE UPGRADE 2112 03/10/94 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -LESS THAN 8500 81,623.75 03/31/94 - *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R DAVID*REIMER 81,735.25 05673' 110-300-0000-3302 57594 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 03245 03/22/94 830.00 7103245 06449 47019 /COURT FINES/PARKING 80.00 03/31/94 -' .,; • _ _______ r•1 • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0010 DATE 04/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC.-.___DATE-EXP-_._ *** VENDOR TOTAL *************sir*ire►************************************************** $30.00 R ROLLING HILLS NURSERY 05637 001-400-6101-4309 01520 $238.15 A19624 08603 47020_.-__ -- PLANTS/PARKS DEPT 19624 03/11/94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $238.15 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $238.15 R ROYAL SAFARI 05074 14.5-400-3.4.09-4201 00114 $316.35 08536 47021 BUS/COMM RES TRIP • 03/24/94 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $316.35 R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D 00839 001-400-2101-4201 01482 $275.00 4-0311-2 08213 47022 BACKGRND CHK/APPLICANT 311-2 03/11/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $275.00 R MICHAEL*SCHUBACH 00536 001-400-4101-4317 00101 $373.42 05864 47023 REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSE 03/28/94 PLANNING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $373.42 11 iu 19 21 l: U U !. R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-202-0000-2021 00613 $7.41 01061 47024 DISCOUNT OFFERED 03/31/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 03/31/94 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-202-0000-2022 00606 $7. 41CR 01061 47024 DISCOUNT TAKEN 03/31/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 03/31/94 '•• R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 1 02814 $363.44 01061____ 47024 _ •• PAINT/CITY HALL 03/31/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $363.44 R BRAD*SMITH 05678 110-300-0000-3302 57599 $20.00 6103441 06457 47025 CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 03441 03/22/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/31/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 SOUTH BAY CITY MANAGERS' ASSOC 03271 001-400-1201-4315 00083 $50.00 ANNUAL DUES/S. BURRELL 03/22/94 CITY MANAGER /MEMBERSHIP 07418 _ 47026 $0.00 03/31/94 'J 1.1 ,,J 110 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 j PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0011 DATE 04/04/94 VND it ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 1i AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $50.00 � vl OrI V lb R R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 94 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 94 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00194 $63.89 03/31/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00573 $87.00 03/31/94 PARKS /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. $150.89 01065 47027 $0.00 03/31/94 01065 47027 $0.00 03/31/94 GAS BILLINGS/MARCH 94 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00767 $852.52 03/31/94 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT APPS/JAN 94 30696 00364 001-400-2101-4251 03/18/94 POLICE $852.52 00540 $92.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SUNSET RANCH HOLLYWOOD STABLES TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 04632 001-400-4601-4201 02219 $92.00 01067 47028 $0.00 03/31/94 930696 00023 47029 $600.00 $0.00 03/31/94 08545 47030 03/28/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT OFFERED R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY__ DISCOUNT TAKEN $600.00 $0.00 03/31/94 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY -PLUMBING SUPPLIES/MAR 94 00124 001-202-0000-2021 00615 03/31/94 $9.48 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00124 001-202-0000-2022 00608 $9.4BCR 03/31/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 00124 160-400-3102-4309 00875 $468.43 01073 $0.00 47031 03/31/94 01073 47031 $0.00 03/31/94 01073 03/31/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TORRANCE LOCK & KEY REKEY%POLICE REMODEL $468.43 $0.00 04162 170-400-8619-4201 00064 $1,342.39 133877/118590 07744 18590 03/10/94 PD REMODEL III /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 51,176.50 47031 03/31/94 47032 03/31/94 'l • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:27:02 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/04/94 PAGE 0012 DATE 04/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* ,16 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP Si. 342. 39 R TRANSPORTATION CHARTER SERV. BUS/COMM RES TRIP 12712 R TRANSPORTATION CHARTER SERV. BUS/COMM RES TRIP 11606 05018 145-400-3409-4201 00115 3334.50 12712 03/24/94 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 05018 03/24/94 145-400-3409-4201 00116 REC TRANSPTN 3550. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STEVE*WISNIEWSKI ADV PENSION PMT/APRIL 94 3884. 50 01364 001-400-1213-4180 00772 32,862.00 08537 47033 30.00 03/31/94 11606 08538 47033 30.00 03/31/94 03/31/94 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 32,862.00 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** 3103, 242. 04 +s 0 , 08413 47034 30. 00 03/31/9-4 *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** 3126,789.34 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY '+' THE WARRANTS LISIED_ON PAGES / TO / 1NCtUSIVE-OF.THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR .____q/41114.. _— ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILA3LE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE 70 THE B1,06ci. BY DATE FINANC DRECTOR gy J J • • April 7, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 12, 1994 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS April 26, 1994 City telephone system Report on seismic upgrade of unreinforced masonry buildings Police Chief Building Director Text amendment to zoning ordinance regarding motion picture filming and other transient activities Planning Director Special study to add or delete Conditional Use Permits for various uses, and general review of the permitted use list for commercial zones. Planning Director May 10, 1994 Report on Community Development Block Grants City Manager Woman's Professional Volleyball Association Tournament - June 11-12/Chamber of Commerce's Pier Promenade Street Scene Community Resources Director May 24, 1994 June 14, 1994 Storm drain/sewer tie-in June 28, 1994 July 12, 1994 Public Works Director 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendments: Air Quality Element Planning Director Special study of zoning ordinance and enforcement ordinance re: parking in front yard setback Planning Director UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by: Council Alternatives for funding underground utilities Public Works Director Council Council Staff Council Emergency generator capability in local grocery stores with incentive program to be provided Police Chief Revision of HBMC provisions pertaining to construction of public street improvements (Public Hearing) Public Works Director County Safe Neighborhood Park Act (Grant -Prop A) application for municipal pier renovation Assistant City Manager Bring back Ordinance on Fire Flow condition and consider revision or abolishment of Fire Flow Fee. Public Works Director Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Director Caltrans utility maintenance agreement Public Works Director South School Park Architectural Plan Admission Charges - AVP Final Map #23863 for a 2 -lot subdivision at 1538 Silver Street Public Hearing: Cable Television Franchise Renewal - MultiVision Cable Adopt Cable Operator Ordinance 2 Community Resources Director Community Resources Director Planning Director Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council March 28, 1994 Regular Meeting April 12, 1994 REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF TWO COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty days (30) days the temporary appointment of two Community Service Officers. Background: This action is necessary as there is currently one absence due to an industrial medical leave and one due to a recent resignation. Analysis: Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six months without approval from the City Council every thirty days. Respectfully sub Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director wp/extend Concur: Stephen R. Burrell City Manager ld March 31, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL FOR USE OF VISA CARD Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, thereby adding the City Manager, Stephen R. Burrell, and Police Chief, Val Straser to the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's VISA card. Background: The City has had possession of a card since 1981. VISA requirements dictate that each eligible user be specifically identified by name and title via a City Council resolution. Analysis: Cards of the former City Manager and Public Safety Director have been destroyed, but their names are still on the resolution of authorized personnel eligible to use cards. We are requesting that the new names be substituted for those of the former City Manager and Public Safety Director. Respectfully submitted: QQ1 Viki Copeland, Finance Director visagnda/T11,OT Concur: Step /-n • . Burrell, City anager le .i• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5109 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA CARD SERVICES FROM SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, was issued a SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION VISA card from the South Bay Credit Union for use by certain officers and employees by Resolution No. 81-4489, as amended by Resolution No. 85-4860, Resolution No. 87-5025, Resolution No. 88-5109, and Resolution No. 92-5510. WHEREAS, a new City Manager and a new Police Chief have been hired, and their responsibilities require purchases that could be facilitated by a VISA card. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the authorized signatures in Section 1 of Resolution 92-5510 be amended to read as follows: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES: NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE AT PACKET PREPARATION TIME. WILL SIGN ORIGINAL RESOLUTION ON MONDAY, APRIL 11, 1994 S . e • . Burre , Valentine P. Straser, City Manager . Police Chief %T Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of April, 1994 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: RESOVISA/kAt , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18• 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92-5530 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5109 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA BANK CARD SERVICES FROM CENTINELA-SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION VISA WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, was issued a CENTINELA-SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION VISA card from the Centinela South Bay Credit Union for use by certain officers and employees by Resolution No. 81-4489, as amended by Resolution No. 85-4860, Resolution No. 87-5025 and Resolution No. 88-5109. WHEREAS, a new City Manager has been hired and his responsibilities require purchases that could be facilitated by a bank card service. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the authorized signatures in Section 1 of Resolution 88-5109 be amended to read as follows: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES: Frederick R.Ferrin City Manager ,ALL , ,, r.. r 43LE APR 2 61992 REC'D. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this Steve Wisniewski Public Safety Director hia Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director 14th day of April, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1992. , City Clerk , City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I, Naoma Valdes, Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 91-5530 g g was duly Y and Y passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at a Regular meeting of said Council at the regular meeting place thereof on April 14, 1992. The vote was as follows: AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None DATED: April 20, 1992 t/tr- Deputy City Clerk CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1994 TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager RE: Memorandum from Tri -Cities Adjudication Program It is recommended that Council receive the attached information and direct staff to write a letter for the Mayor's signature expressing oppositiop to AB2414. 1f TRI -CITIES ADJUDICATION PROGRAM HERMOSA BEACH, MANHATTAN BEACH & REDONDO BEACH To: Steve Burrell, Hermosa Beach City Manager; Val Strasser, Hermosa Beach Chief of Police; Bill Smith, Manhattan Beach City Manager; Ted J. Mertens, Manhattan Beach Chief of Police; William Kirchhoff, Redondo Beach City Manager; Mel Nichols, Redondo Beach Chief of Police From: Staff Subject: Assembly Bill 2414 The Joint Cities Adjudication Program was created to provide administrative hearings for parking violations on a regional basis. The purpose of this regional approach was to maximize scheduling options for the public and to minimize costs to individual agencies. Our local program has operated successfully since its inception meeting both public needs and agency needs. During a scheduled meeting of the Tri -Cities Adjudication Staff on March 3, 1994 we received a copy of proposed legislation Assembly Bill 2414 authored by Assembly Member Epple and Mr. Karsman of the City of Los Angeles. This memo is to bring to your attention concerns the Tri -Cities Staff have regarding the potential financial impact which could affect the adjudication and processing of Notice of Parking Violations (NPV) in each of our communities if this legislation is passed. Assembly Bill 2414 would require that "in addition to other requirements of employment... an examiner shall ... have successfully completed the minimum educational requirements for application to the state bar examination." If passed, this legislation would create a tremendous financial burden on many small cities such as ours. An example of the magnitude of this legislation can be seen by the comparison of our cities current expenditures for hearing officers, which consists of salaried employees assuming collateral duties, amounting to approximately $20.00/hr. (including benefits), or in the case of Hermosa Beach a budgeted position of $13.00/hr. versus the cost of attorneys fees of at least $125.00/hr. With an estimated 20 hours per week for preparation and hearings the cost of an attorney could exceed $125,000 annually. Another potential problem for our cities comes from a pending case out of Monterey, California. In this case the question of due process has been raised regarding the legality of collecting the penalties imposed by NPV's prior to having a hearing. If this ruling on this case is determined in the plaintiff's favor, it will have a significant impact on the way our cities are currently collecting and processing penalties imposed by the issuance of NPV's. It may be to the advantage of our cities to implement a change in the collection of penalties and avoid potential litigation from a pending court decision in the Monterey, California case. We recognize the continual budgetary restraints affecting our cities. The passage of AB2414 would severely hinder the ability of our cities to administer and process Notice of Parking Violations. The bill is now in the hands of the Transportation Committee. There is still time to stop the bill or to revise it so that its goal can be met without significant financial impact. We plan to work with the California Public Parking Association to lobby against this bill as written. We request your assistance in that effort and further request that communications be sent to Sacramento voicing the above concerns. March 31, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 INFORMATION REPORT, GRACE PERIOD FOR PARKING PERMITS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: At the City Council meeting of March 22, 1994, the City Council requested that staff report back with information regarding the grace period for parking permits. Analysis: Annual parking permits expire on February 28th (or 29th) of each year. Renewal forms were sent out February 2nd and 3rd; permits went on sale over the counter February 22nd. Renewals by mail are encouraged and if postmarked by February 28th, will be processed prior to the issuance of citations for an expired permit. The grace period on issuance of parking citations for expired permits allows for ample time to obtain permits either in person or via the mail, before enforcement begins. This year, the grace period was two weeks, or until March 14th. Enforcement officers began citing on that date for vehicles with expired permits. The grace period on the issuance of citations is not advertised, however, most citizens coming into the office seem to be aware of it. A grace period has been given since the inception of the program. Citizens inquiring about the grace period are told that there is a grace period of at least two weeks. Once the actual date is set for the grace period to end, inquirers are told the date citing will begin. The current procedure affords the resident the convenience of requesting new permits by mail, up to the permit expiration date of February 28th, and ensures that timely renewals will receive permits before enforcement begins. To date, staff has received few complaints about the grace period, therefore no change in the procedure has been contemplated. If the City Council prefers an alternative procedure, the grace period can be eliminated by sending renewals out earlier, and requiring an earlier postmark for renewals by mail. Permits would expire on February 28th and citing would always begin March 1st. Since past practice has been to have a grace period, however, this alternative would probably generate a lot of complaints. Respectfully submitted: Concur: Viki Copland, Finance Director grace/11 ba Stephen t rrell, City Manage ig March 31, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Regular Meeting of April 12, 1994 1 KIWANIS HOLIDAY TREE LOT AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council approve the use of the Community Center lawn by the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot for the 1994 holiday season. Background The Kiwanis Club has operated this lot for six years on the Community Center lawn (southeast portion) and each year Council has approved this request. The sale will be a fundraiser for the Kiwanis Club and will also benefit the Community Center Foundation's improvement fund for the Community Center. The Kiwanis Club agrees to donate $1,000 or 10 percent of their net profits, whichever is higher, to the Community Center Foundation. Analysis The following list of terms will be in effect for 1994 season: • The location of the trees shall be on the east lawn of the Community Center; • The area can be fenced in and lighted; • Temporary signs can be installed on the front lawn. • Kiwanis will assume all costs for restoring the area back to its original state, with the Public Works Department approving all work; said work to be completed by January 15, 1995; • Kiwanis will be allowed to have a camper on 11th Place for 24 hour security purposes; • Kiwanis will pay to the City any other costs incurred by the City with regard to this project • Kiwanis may occupy the site from November 14, 1994 through January 2, 1995; • Kiwanis will provide liability insurance in the amount of $1 million. The Kiwanis Club has proven over the years to be responsible and cooperative with all City requirements and requests. The lot has proven to have minimal negative impact on the condition of the lawn and on the smooth operation of the Community Center. The Kiwanis Club will present the Community Center Foundation with a check for $2,134.57 at tonight's Council meeting from the 1993 lot proceeds. lh 1 l I FISCAL IMPACT: NONE Concur: FIs Mary C 41: ney Co unity Resources Director/ Acting City Manager Respectfully Submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. April 4, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa beach City Council of April 12, 1994 PARKING ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE PURCHASE RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Police Department and Community Services Division Staff that Council : 1. Authorize the purchase of three (3) "GO -4" gas powered utility parking enforcement vehicles for a total cost of $49,745.00, which includes the base price of $14,671.00 each plus tax and delivery charges. BACKGROUND: The purchase of these vehicles described herein was authorized and funds were appropriated in the 1993-94 adopted budget. The source of the funds for these vehicles is the General Fund. The original request for the purchase of these vehicles was brought to the City Council for approval at the City Council meeting of March 8, 1994. It was staffs' request at that time to purchase these "GO -4" vehicles from Frankson's Inc., the only authorized dealer in Southern California, and that the Formal Bid Process be waived. It was the direction of Council to deny staffs' request to waive the Formal Bid Process . Following Councils directive, a Request for Proposal was completed and sent out. The Formal Bid Process was conducted, closing at 1000 hours, March 31, 1994. The City Clerk's Office received two sealed bids. The first bid was from Frankson's Inc. with a list price of $14,671.00 each. Frankson's bid did not change.The second sealed bid was from Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc., the distributor of the Cushman parking enforcement vehicles, they returned the Request For Proposal stamped, "NO BID". ANALYSIS: The parking enforcement vehicles, "GO -4" which staff is requesting, are three - wheeled gas powered scooter type vehicles. These vehicles are the same type of parking enforcement vehicles being used by the Cities of Manhattan Beach, Santa Monica, Ventura, San Bernadino and San Diego California. The named cities have found the "GO -4" scooters to be more mechanically reliable, better suited for city parking enforcement and safer to operate than the Cushman scooters. Currently, only 4 or 5 of Hermosa's eleven Cushmans are operable. The three new "GO -4s" would replace four of the 1986-87 Cushman scooters which have become mechanically obsolete and financially impracticable to maintain. The Cushmans being replaced will be auctioned or sold for parts. 1i The staff conducted tests using the "GO -4" vehicles in our city with very favorable results. Again it is staffs' recommendation that City Council approve the purchase of these vehicles, as they directly affect the Community Services Division's effectiveness to do their assignments and reduce costs associated with "Down Time" for equipment and personnel. Respectfully submi d, .AGi7N6 Val Straser, of of Police By: John J. Kearin, Sergeant Community Services Division Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Fiscal Impact $49,745.00 March 21, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 ACCEPT CONSTRUCTION AS COMPLETE FOR STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH CIP 90-144 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept construction as complete for the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path, constructed by Emma Corporation at a cost of $951,188 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. 3. Authorize staff to: a) Release the retention payment to Emma Corporation 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. b) Release Emma Corporation from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. Background: On February 9, 1993, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Emma corporation in the amount of $659,100 for the reconstruction of approximately 101,233 square feet of 7.5" Portland cement pavement and approximately 6,426 lineal feet of reinforced cast in place concrete wall. Analysis: This section is divided as follows: 1. Project Constructed According to Plans and Specifications 2. Time Schedule 3. Notice of Completion 4. Release of Bonds 5. Release of Retention Payment 6. Construction Costs 7. Summary of Work Completed by This Project 8. Funding - 1 - 1 j 1. Project Constructed According to Plans and Specifications The project has been built according to the plans and specifications and change orders prepared by the City engineering staff. The Public Works Inspector as well as the Harris and Associates Inspector have inspected the project for compliance with the plans and specifications and change orders. 2. Time Schedule Notice to Proceed Start Date March 22, 1993 Date of Completion February 25, 1994 3. Notice of Completion Staff recommends that a Notice of Completion be signed by the Mayor and that the Notice be recorded with the County Recorder. 4. Release of Bonds Pending City Council authorization, after the Notice of Completion is recorded, staff will release Emma Corporation from the obligation of the following: 1. Faithful performance bond, and labor and materials bond Bonding Company: Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, N.J. Amount of each bond to be Released: $659,100 Bond number: --135-99-61 5. Release of Retention Payment Pending City Council approval, the retention payment will be released to Emma Corporation thirty-five (35) days after recordation of the Notice of Completion (provided no stop notices or mechanics liens are received within that time period). 6. Final Construction Costs Original Contract Amount Amount Added by Change Orders Amount Expended (including retention) Balance of the Contract 2 $659,100.00 $326,566.30 $951,187.40 $ 34,478.90 7. Summary of Work Completed Within the course of this project the following areas were improved: Replacement of existing pavement (Herondo to 8th St. and 15th to 24th St.) Overlay of the bike path on Hermosa Ave. (24th St. to 35th St.) Connection of bike path at 35th St. to Manhattan Beach bike path. Construction of the new planters at the newly connected bike path to Manhattan Beach. Installation of new hand rails at 35th St. stairway leading to Strand. Construction of colored reinforced concrete wall from Herondo to 24th St. Replacement of 38 Marble poles with new aluminum street light poles and fixtures. Installation of 2 new aluminum street light poles and fixtures at the new connection of the bikeway to existing Manhattan Beach bikeway. Installation of new signs and flashing lights. Trash lids are ordered and will be installed in 6 weeks. Funding: Regional and Local Transportation Development Act (TDA) Total Construction cost $1,196,950 $1,166,042 Fund Balance $ 30,908 The remaining balance will be expended on signs and sand gates. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to the City Council are: 1. Do not accept construction as complete. 2. Add additional construction work to the contract. Respectfully submitted, P Homayo.'n Behboodi C.I.P. Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: a Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/bikeway5 Concur: Amy Amirani, Director of Public Works (4)`v. Steph Burrell City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 5, 1994 City Council Meeting of April 12, 1994 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE GENERAL, SUPERVISORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES' BARGAINING UNITS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council ADOPT the attached Resolution approving Memoranda of Understanding between the City of Hermosa Beach and the General/Supervisory and Administrative Bargaining Units represented by the California Teamsters' Public, Professional and Medical Employees' Union, Local 911. Background: The existing Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the General/Supervisory and Administrative Bargaining Units, represented by the California Teamsters' Public, Professional and Medical Employees' Union, Local 911, expired August 31, 1993. City and Union representatives have met and conferred toward reaching agreement on successor MOU's and on March 30th, tentative agreement was reached between the parties within council authorization. The Teamster Union scheduled ratification meetings for April 4th and 5th, 1994 and has notified the City that the membership has approved the agreements. Analysis: The following highlights the negotiated changes in the terms and conditions for the successor MOU's: * Three year term: September 1, 1993 through August 31, 1996 * Salary adjustment: September 1, 1993 - 1% September 1, 1994 - To be negotiated September 1, 1995 - To be negotiated * $75.00/year increase in uniform allowance effective March 1, 1994 * Pro -rating of educational incentive for less than full time employees * Combines General and Supervisory bargaining units * Establishes a premium for bilingual language skill effective July 1, 1994. * Establishes premium pay classifications for positions which have assumed supervisory responsibilities as result of downsizing (e.g. Lead Public Safety Dispatcher, Lead Police Service Officer and Finance Supervisor). * Establishes premium pay for Public Works field personnel possessing journey level skills as carpenter, electrician, traffic specialist, irrigation specialist and street maintenance technician. ik * Changes Recreation Specialist title to Recreation Supervisor. * Calls for City to obtain an actuarial cost analysis from the Public Employees Retirement System (P.E.R.S.) for the 2% c@ 55 and employer paid member contribution (EMPC) credit amendments. * Secretary Position eligible for Sr. Secretary premium effective July 1, 1994. * Places Account Clerk classification at Technical Aide salary range and eliminates Technical Aide classification (resolves pending arbitration regarding issue). Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact for FY 93/94 is $34,000. Scheduled increases in FY 94/95 are an additional $10,586. This equates to a 1.4% increase cost over the previous year. Copies of the Memoranda of Understanding are available in the Personnel Office for review. Respectfully submi ed: Concur: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Cope and Finance Director hull\teamster Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94- 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, 3 CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CALIFORNIA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL EMPLOYEES 4 UNION, LOCAL 911, GENERAL/SUPERVISORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES' BARGAINING UNITS. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, employees of the City of Hermosa Beach, California represented by the California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees' Union, Local 911 have elected to meet and confer with the City of Hermosa Beach on matters concerning wages, hours, and working conditions; and, WHEREAS, the above personnel have selected certain individuals to represent them; and, WHEREAS, Employee and Management representatives have jointly negotiated Memoranda of Understanding which have been ratified by a majority vote of the members of the General/Supervisory and Administrative Employees' Bargaining Units; and, WHEREAS, The Employee and Management representatives have mutually agreed to recommend that the City Council adopt these Memoranda of Understanding. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLVES to enter into Memoranda of Understanding to be effective for the period September 1, 1993 through and including August 31, 1996. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of April 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Memorandum DATE: April 4, 1994 TO: City Council FROM: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner74, RE: Commercial Development Standards in the Downtown Area (C-2 zone) INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation Adopt the attached Resolution of Intent to study commercial development standards. Discussion Staff has recently received correspondence in regards to two commercial standards that may be inhibiting desired commercial activity in the downtown area: 1) Commercial building setbacks adjacent to residential areas, and 2) The distance requirement from residential uses for operation of an off -sale alcohol establishment. In the interest of promoting revitalization of the downtown district staff believe these issues are ripe for discussion, and possible consideration of code changes. Further, while discussing these two issues other standards could be examined for possible changes (e.g. permitted outdoor uses/activities). Michael Schubach, Plannin Director May, As stant City Manager Attachments 1. Correspondence 2. Relevant Code Sections 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO INITIATE A STUDY OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, ESPECIALLY AS THEY APPLY TO THE C-2 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on April 12, 1994, to consider initiating a study of commercial development standards and made a following findings: A. Certain standards that apply to commercial zones, including setback requirements from residential uses and residential zones, should be examined for their applicability to the downtown district; B. Downtown revitalization is important to the economy of Hermosa Beach and, as such, it is important that all developments standards are written in recognition of the need for revitalization and do not inhibit it in any way; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY INITIATE A STUDY OF COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AND DIRECTS STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE THE ZONING CODE FOR POSSIBLE CHANGES H/ccrsint PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Beach MaMet, Inc. 8 March 1994 ( „ ? '7 G - Hermosa Beach City Council D Hermosa Beach City Hall —� Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Dear Esteemed City Council Members: As an Overview We (Mr. and Mrs. Stephen C. Douglas) not only are eight year residents of Hermosa Beach, but we also have owned the Beach Market, located at 1325 Hermosa Avenue, since the Fall of 1990. The Beach Market is a convenience store, but does not have an off -sale alcohol beverage license. We would be deeply appreciative if you would review our request for a "Conditional Use Permit (CUP)" for the off -sale of alcohol beverages. We realize that Appendix A -Zoning, Section 10-8 of the Hermosa Beach Ordinances requires that any new off -sale alcohol beverage establishment shall be a minimum of one hundred feet from any residential use and/or zone. However, from the information presented herein, we feel confident that you will see that the Beach Market has a very positive influence on our community and the provision of the requested CUP will enable us to continue to provide a long-term benefit to our neighborhood. Our Community Contributions Since our acquisition of the Beach Market, we have consistently provided service to the Hermosa Beach City and community — this includes the following: • Hermosc. Beach Beaut ficatLon Award, from. the Chamber of Commerce. • Donation of Two Pawn trees on Herwwsa Avenue. • Free water suppiy to aLL vendors at the Hermosa Street Fairs (twice yearly). • Chamber of Commerce Donations and Membership. • Engage a FULL Tivne Craning and Grounds Maintenance Crew to ensure that the Beach Market maintains its "clean, neighborly" appearance. 1325 Hermosa Ave., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 3 Beach Market, Inc. Beach Market Site Plan If you notice on the attached drawing, you will see that only one property (and NOT its residence building) is actually within the one hundred feet limit. The other properties are zoned commercial (although occupied as living quarters by tenants of the absentee landlords). Thus, the effectual proximity of the residentially zoned areas is confined to at most one property and is separated from the Beach Market by a street and parking lot. Our Declaration If provided with the privilege of the Conditional Use Permit, we will strictly abide by all of the City, State and/or Federal laws concerning the off -sale of alcoholic beverages. Attached is the site drawing and our application for the Conditional Use Permit. We deeply appreciate the investment of your time and expertise required to review our application. Sincerely, Stephen C. and Celina C. Douglas Owners of the Beach Market. 1325 Hermosa Ave., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Beach Market, Mc k Beach Market Site Overview Commercially zoned but with residents. Parking Lot (City) Beach Market Bldg. 100' 1 West Residence Hermosa Ave. 100' 14th St. 1325 Hermosa Ave., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 5 C C § 8-5 APPENDIX A—ZONING §,8-5 Sec.. 8-5. Standards and limitations. Every use permitted' or maintained in C -zones shall be subject to the following: (1) Parking. Parking shall be provided as specified by Article 11.5. (2) Enclosures. All uses shall be conducted wholly within a building enclosed on all sides, except for the following: a. Outdoor uses permitted by conditional use permit as stated in the permitted use list; b. Commercial parking lot; c. Uses incidental to a use conducted primarily within a building located on the premises; provided that such incidental uses are not conducted in whole or in part on sidewalks, public ways or within any required front or rear yard; and provided, further, that such inciden- tal uses are of a type which cannot be economically or practically conducted within buildings. Where inciden- tal uses are not conducted within a building, no part of the area devoted to the incidental uses shall be con- sidered as part of the required parking facilities. All outdoor storage or activities shall be substantially screened from public visibility, public streets, parks or other public places, and properties. (3) Reserved. (4) Merchandise. No merchandise shall be sold other than at retail. Sale of repossessed merchandise or secondhand mer- chandise taken in by the seller as a trade-in on new mer- chandise is permissible,. provided that such sales are con- ducted on the premises where such merchandise was orig- inally sold, or any successor locations. (5) Signs. Signs for this section are regulated by section 28A-13 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. (6) Building height: a. In the C-1 zone, any building may have a maximum height of thirty (30) feet. Supp. No. 6-89 503 "b. In the C-2 zone, no building shall exceed a maximum height of thirty (30) feet. c. In the C-3 zone, no building shall exceed a maximum height of thirty—five (35) feet." Editor's note—Ord. No. 87-894, § 1, approved by the electorate on Nov. 3, 1987, provides that any amendment of § 8-5(6) which raises maximum building height limits in C-1, C-2 or C-3 zones shall only be approved by a vote of the people through the initiative process. • (7) Front yard setback. No lot need provide a front yard except as may he required by a precise plan. (8) Alley setback. Buildings shall conform with Article 11.5, section 1161. (9) Rear and side yard setback adjacent to residential zones. A minimum rear and/or side yard setback of eight (8) feet shall be provided, and an additional two (2) feet of setback shall be provided for each story over the first story for structures that abut residential zones, except where public rights-of-way, twenty (20) feet or greater in width, separate the commercial zone from the residential zone. (10) Landscaping adjacent to residential zones. The required rear and/or side yard area shall be landscaped and pro- vided with an automatic watering system. Size, quantity, and type of landscaping shall be subject to review and approval by the planning director. Landscaping shall be appropriately maintained, trimmed, and void of weeds. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 87-889, § 1, 7-28-87) ARTICLE 8.5. RESERVED* Secs. 8.5-1-8.5-11. Reserved. •Editor's Note—Ord. No. 86-865, § 2, adopted Dec. 16, 1986, provided for the deletion of former Art. 8.5, §§ 8.5-1-8.5-11, which pertained to commercial planned development (CPD) and was derived from Ord. No. N.S. 451, § 1, adopted Mar. 6, 1973, and Ord. No. 79-623, § 3; adopted Oct. 23, 1979. • Supp. No. 6-89 504 ,<‘ § 10-8 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 10-8 (10) The exterior of the premises including parking areas shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. (11) Any changes to the interior layout shall be subject to re- view and approval by the planning commission. (12) Prior to a conditional use permit being in effect, the appli- cant shall submit to the planning department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. (13) A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the planning department. (14) The planning commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detri- mental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the sub- ject use. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 92-1079, §§ 1, 2, 12-15-92) Sec. 10-8. Off -sale alcohol beverage establishments. Any new off -sale alcohol beverage establishments shall be a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from any residential use and/or zone. The following minimum conditions and standards, in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compat- ibility with existing or future permitted use in the vicinity, may be required: (1) Alcohol sales shall be prohibited at any establishment selling gasoline. (2) Measures shall be taken to control loitering and littering on the premises at all times. (3) Clearly visible signs prohibiting loitering, littering, con- sumption of alcohol on the premises and limiting the parking period to two (2) hours shall be posted in conspic- uous locations. (4) The entire parking lot shall be illuminated and designed not to produce glare on adjoining property; lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the planning commission. Supp. No. 1-93 516.5 9 ADDRESS: Exctm p 1 0-C \Oc1C\C5 TDOv.!i-l*c) u f A(e"i DATE: / 21 - SUPPLEMENT - SUPPLEMENT INFORMATIO (vEz.) ADDRESS: EX<,r-,r,l•e_ a -c Sk1?r%[ctrr :r kr). „1 �rLc . DATE:3 / ZL / 614 March 23, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1994 - 1995 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING JUNE 14, 1994, FOR A PUBLIC HEARING Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt the attached resolution approving the report of the Director of Public Works of said City made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 94-5661. 2. Adopt the attached resolution of intent to order certain Crossing guard services pursuant to the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974", Chapter 3.5, Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 55570 of the Government Code of the State of California, at certain locations in the said City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995; setting June 14, 1994 to accept public input on the matter of the proposed Crossing Guard District. Background: On February 22, 1994, City Council adopted resolution 94-5661 ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1994 - 1995. Analysis: Adoption of both resolutions is necessary at this time so that a public hearing can be held to take testimony on the assessments. The first Resolution approves the report prepared by the Director of Public Works for the City's Crossing Guard Assessment District. Its adoption confirms that the report has been prepared prior to the public hearing. The report has the estimated assessment for the proposed Crossing Guard Maintenance District and is on file in the City Clerk's office. The district assessments are the same as last year. The unit fee is based on equivalent dwelling units. The annual assessment fee is $5.05 per unit. The adoption of the second resolution provides for the setting of a public hearing for June 14, 1994, at 8:00 p.m. (or as soon as possible thereafter) to accept public input on the matter of the proposed Crossing Guard Maintenance District and assessment. At the conclusion of the public hearing on June 14, 1994, the City Council will be provided with a resolution it may adopt concerning the assessment district. - 1 - 1 m As mentioned earlier, all decisions will be made at the public hearing and adoption of this resolution will only confirm that the report has been prepared prior to the public hearing. Alternatives: An alternative available to City Council is: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, causing a potential increased General Fund obligation of $54,722. Respectfully submitted, Concur: H Homa"6un Behboodi C Amy Amirani, C.I.P. Engineer Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Stephen Burrell City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director Attachments: Summary of Funds Detailed Estimate of Costs FY 1994-1995 Resolution Approving the District Report Resolution Setting a Time and Place for the Public Hearing pworks/cg CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1994-1954 SUMMARY OF FUNDS FY 93-94 Actual Fund Balance July 1, 1993 - Assessment for FY 93-94 - Other Revenue - Interest Income Estimated FY 93-94 Expenditure - Operational Budget - Interfund Transfers Out Estimated June 30, 1994, Balance FY 94-95 Actual Fund Balance July 1, 1994 - Assessment for FY 94-95 - Other Revenue - Interest Income Estimated FY 94-95 Expenditure - Operational Budget - Interfund Transfers Out $ 60,277 54,843 1,500 2,797 (60,262) ( 5,019) $ 54,136 $ 54,136 54,722 1,500 1,846 (66,026) ( 4,980) Estimated June 30, 1995, Balance $ 41,198 pworks/hbcgs CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1994-1995 DETAILED ESTIMATE OF COST FY 1994-1995 1. Direct Expenses: Regular Salaries/Miscellaneous $ 9,795 Special Duty Pay -0- Vacation/Sick Pay Off 245 Accrual Cash In 245 Crossing Guards 47,735 Retirement 2,104 Social Security/FICA 2,254 Uniforms 1,200 Employee Benefits 846 Medicare Benefits 527 Office Supplies 100 Contract Services/Private: - Assessment Engineering Services -0- Contract Services/Government: - L.A. Co. Collections of Assessments 975 2. Incidental Expenses: Administration Insurance Expense Subtotal: $ 66,026 $ 980 4,000 Subtotal: $ 4,980 Total Cost for Crossing Guards $ 71,006 Maintenance District 1994-1995 pworks/hbcgs CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH J LECENO WALKSTREETS f\no J CJI _JLU:j11 T-1 C] D. Vil-Aono c� 1 D CDp i i 11 111 I L /1400 aas _— �0� i . MAP OF CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1994-1995 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94- 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CROSSING 3 GUARD SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE "THE CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ACT OF 1974", CHAPTER 3.5, ARTICLES 1, 2, 3 AND 4, 4 SECTION 55530 THROUGH 55570, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS IN THE SAID CITY, FOR THE 5 FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1994 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1995; AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1994-1995 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The public interest and convenience require, and that it is the intention of the. City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, to order certain Crossing Guard 13 Maintenance Services to be provided and maintained at certain 14 street crossings throughout the City for the fiscal year 15 beginning July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995. 16 11 All of the services above specified shall be provided and 17 maintained in accordance with requirements of 18 Public Works. Said costs shall be funded as 19 Report of the Director of Public Works dated the Director of referred to in the April 5, 1994, on 20 file in the office of the City Clerk and which is hereby referred 21 to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part 22 hereof. 23 SECTION 2. To expedite the providing and maintenance of said 24 services, the City Council may at any time transfer into the 25 "Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District 1994-1995 26 Fund", out of any money in the General Fund, any sums as it shall 27 deem necessary, and the sums so transferred shall be deemed a 28 loan to such fund, and shall be repaid out of the proceeds of th 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 assessments provided for in this resolution (within the same fiscal year) and pursuant to the provisions of Section 55561 of the Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974. SECTION 3. That said contemplated service, in the opinion of the City Council, is of more than local or ordinary benefit, and said -City Council hereby makes the expense of said service chargeable upon a district, which district said Council hereby declares to be the district benefited by said Crossing Guard Services, and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said district is all of the City. of Hermosa Beach as shown on MAP OF CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1994-1995 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, on which exterior boundaries thereof are described as the boundary lines of the said City, excepting from said district any portion of any public land, street or alley which may be included therein. Reference is hereby made to the said map as the description of said district. The said map on file shall govern as to the extent of said assessment district. SECTION 4. The Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, shall levy an annual special assessment to pay the costs of maintaining said Crossing Guards. The annual assessment shall be levied and collected at the same time and in the same manner and with the same interest and penalties as general taxes of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. (Said taxes as collected by the Los Angeles County Tax Collector for the City of Hermosa Beach.) SECTION 5. Any lots or parcels of land known as public property, as the same is defined in Section 55560 of said 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Crossing Guard Maintenance Act of 1974, hereinafter referred to which are included in the said assessment district, shall be omitted and exempt from the assessment to be made to cover the costs and expenses of said contemplated improvement. SECTION 6. The improvement contemplated by this Resolution of Intention shall be done under the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974", Chapter 3.5, Articles 1, 2, 3 -and 4, Section 55530 through 55570 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 7. That Tuesday, June 14, 1994, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. of the said day be and the same is hereby appointed as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the City of Hermosa Beach, California is hereby appointed as the place for hearing protests as to the question of approving and confirming the assessment to said improvement. SECTION 8. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized, designated and directed to give notice of said hearing in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 9. That the EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, circulated within the said City of Hermosa Beach, California, is hereby designated as the newspaper in whic said notice shall be published. SECTION 10. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately; and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and 24 11 adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the sam= to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council 26 of said City and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption 27 thereof in the records of the proceeding of the City. Council of 28 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of April., 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: 8 , CITY CLERK 9 10 11 APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY ATTORNEY 12 13 pworks/cgres 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF SAID CITY MADE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION 94-5661 OF SAID COUNCIL. HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1994-1995 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, did in Resolution No. 94-5661, adopted February 22, 1994, pursuant to the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974", Chapter 3.5, Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 55570 of the Government Code of the State of California, did require the Director of Public Works to make and file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in writing, presenting certain matters relating to the proposed "Crossing Guards Maintenance District Act of 1974"; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works, pursuant to the requirements of said City Council as expressed in Resolution No. 94-5661, and of said law, did make and on the 5th day of Apri1,1994, file in the Office of the City Clerk (who is ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of said City), his or her report in writing responsive to the requirements of said Resolution 94-5661 and of said law referred to in said Resolution No. 94-5661, and as contemplated under the provisions of said "Crossing Guards Maintenance District Act of 1974"; and WHEREAS, said City Clerk has presented the said report to the City Council of said City, and said Council has proceeded to carefully examine, inspect and consider the said report and is satisfied with said report and with each and all of the items therein set forth. - 1 - 1 2 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOS'A BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the report of the Director of Public Works 3 in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, bearing the date of the 4 5th day of April, 1994, which said report was prepared and filed 5 pursuant to the requirements of the provisions of Resolution No. 6 94-5661 of the City Council of said City and in conformity with 7 the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 8 1974", Chapter 3.5, Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 g through 55570 of the Government Code of the State of California 10 on the 5th day of April, 1994, be and the same is hereby approved 11 12 13 so prepared, SECTION 2. and adoption of as presented and filed. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage this resolution, shall cause the same to be 14 entered among the original resolutions of 15 make a minute of the passage and adoption 16 of the proceedings of the City Council of said City; and shall thereof in the records said City in the 17 II minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. 18 19 20 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of 21 Hermosa Beach, California 22 II ATTEST: 23 24 25 11 26 27 28 , CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY ATTORNEY pworks/rescg March 21, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1994-1995 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING JUNE 14, 1994, FOR A PUBLIC HEARING Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt the attached resolution approving the report of the Director of Public Works of said City made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 94-5662. 2. Adopt the attached resolution of intent to order certain landscaping and street lighting appurtenances to be installed and maintained and electric current to be furnished for street lighting fixtures throughout the City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995; setting June 14, 1994, to accept public input on the matter of the proposed Landscaping and Street Lighting District. Background: On February 22, 1994, City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-5662 ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting Maintenance District 1994-1995. Analysis: In keeping with the Council's desire to keep the cost of our special districts as low as possible, the Council in FY 1990-91 amended the City's policy to have the assessment and revenue be less than the cost of the district operations. This policy was to continue until the fund balance reduced back to the 1988 level ($1,089,118). Adoption of the attached resolution is to provide approximately 30% of the funds necessary to continue the operation of the City's landscaping and street lighting system for one year. Adoption of both resolutions is necessary at this time so that a public hearing can be held to take testimony on the assessments. The first Resolution approves the report prepared by the Director of Public Works. Its adoption confirms that the report has been prepared prior to the public hearing. This report covers matters relating to the proposed landscaping and Street Lighting Maintenance District and is on file in the City Clerk's office. The district assessments for this year are $16.84 per equivalent - 1 - In dwelling unit and are the same equivalent dwelling unit cost as used last year. The adoption of the second resolution provides for the setting of a public hearing for June 14, 1994, at 8:00 p.m. (or as soon as possible thereafter). At the conclusion of the public hearing on June 14, 1994, the City Council will be provided with a resolution it may adopt concerning the assessment district. As mentioned earlier, all decisions will be made at the public hearing and adoption of this resolution will only confirm that the report has been prepared prior to the public hearing. Alternatives: An alternative available to City Council is: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, causing a potential increased General Fund obligation of $182,478. Respectfully submitted, Concur: if &4 atnt4WvIv. Homayn Behboodi Amy Am rani C.I.P. Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: acc:aoeeet, Viki Copeland Finance Director Director of Public Works Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Attachments: Summary of Funds Detailed Estimate of Costs FY 1994-1995 Resolution Approving the District Report Resolution Setting a time and place for the Public Hearing Summary of Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 pworks/st OF HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1994-1995 SUMMARY OF FUNDS FY 93-94 Actual July 1, 1993 Fund Balance $1,382,942 Estimated FY 93-94 Revenue - Current year secured assessment - Prior year collections - Interest Income Estimated FY 93-94 Expenditure - Operational Budget - Capital Improvement Budget - Interfund Transfers Out 183,000 3,300 65,333 (311,787) ( 25,000) ( 21,791) Estimated June 30, 1994 Fund Balance $1,275,997 FY 94-95 Estimated July 1, 1994 Fund Balance $1,275,997 Estimated FY 94-95 Revenue - Current year secured assessment - Prior year collections - Interest Income Estimated FY 94-95 Expenditure - Operational Budget for St. Lighting - Operational Budget for Landscaping (Private Contract) - Capital Improvement Budget for St. Lighting - Capital Improvement Budget for Landscaping - Interfund Transfers Out 182,478 23,986 49,440 (306,034) (148,000) ( 10,000) ( 35,000) ( 20,802) Estimated June 30, 1995 Fund Balance $1,012,065 pworks/hbcgs CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT .1994-1995 DETAILED ESTIMATE OF COST FY 1994-1995 1. Direct Expenses: Regular Salaries/Miscellaneous $ 94,998 Regular Overtime 175 Vacation/Sick Pay Off 2,375 Accrual Cash In 2,375 Part Time/Temporary -0- Retirement 12,283 Employee Benefits 12,518 Medicare Benefits 810 Contract Services/Private: - Parks and Median Islands Landscaping 148,000 Hauling Charges 1,500 Contract Services/Government: - L.A. Co. To do Assessment Services 975 - PCH Lighting Agreement w/Caltrans 8,500 Materials/Supplies/Other (incl. energy costs) - Street lighting utilities 150,075 - Street lighting telephone 250 - Street ligthing maintenance materials 10,000 - Street lighting motors fuels & lubes 1,400 - Street lighting auto maintenance 2,800 - Street lighting training -0- Lease Agreement - Fork Lift 5,000 2. Incidental Expenses: Administration Insurance Subtotal: $454,034 $ 9,500 11,302 Subtotal: $ 20,802 3. Operating Expenses of Equipment and Data Support Services: -0- Subtotal: $ -0- 4. Capital Improvements: CIP 94-524 Installation of New Planters, Median Islands/Upgrading CIP 94-201 Street Light Upgrade Light Conversion/Installation Subtotal: $ 35,000 $ 10,000 $ 45,000 Total Costs for Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1994-1995 $564,836 pworks/hbcgs CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LEGEND El WALK SIREE TS 1 ; \---) 1 1 Lji fi-. --Pi °HT tiCj drOggiiC o�%'�al� I , i 1. I I l�j I L C MAP OF LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1994-1995 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING APPURTENANCES TO BE INSTALLED, MAINTAINED AND ELECTRIC CURRENT TO BE FURNISHED FOR STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES THROUGHOUT THE CITY, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1994 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1995; AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO. HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1994-1995 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The public interest and convenience require, and that it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, to order certain landscaping and street lighting appurtenances to be provided, installed and maintained; and that electric current be furnished for street lighting fixtures and appurtenances throughout the City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995. All of the landscaping, fixtures and appurtenances above specified shall be installed in accordance with Specifications and Plans as required by the Director of Public Works. The costs of said landscaping, fixtures, appurtenances and electric current shall be funded as shown in the report from the Director of Public Works dated April 5, 1994, on file in the office of the City Clerk and which is hereby referred to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. To expedite the making of said improvements, the City Council may at any time transfer into the "Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1994-1995 Fund", out of any money in the General Fund, any sums as it shall deem necessary, and the sums so transferred shall be deemed a loan to 1 2 such fund, and shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the assessments provided for in this resolution (within the same fiscal year) and pursuant to the provisions of Section 22657(b) 3 II of the California Streets and Highways Code, "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" referred to herein. SECTION 3. That said contemplated service, in the opinion of 6 11 the City Council, is of more than local or ordinary benefit, and said City Council hereby makes the expense of said service chargeable upon a district, which district said Council hereby 9 declares to be the district benefited by said landscaping and 10 street lighting appurtenances, and that district shall be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said district is all of the City of Hermosa Beach as shown on MAP OF LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1994-1995 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, on which exterior boundaries thereof are described as the boundary lines of the said City, excepting from 16 said district any portion of any public land, street or alley 17 which may be included therein. Reference is hereby made to the said map as the description of said district. The said map on 19 11 file shall govern as to the extent of said assessment district. SECTION 4. The Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, shall levy an annual special assessment to pay the 22 II costs of maintaining said Landscaping and Street Lighting. The 4 5 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 18 20 21 23 annual assessment shall be levied and collected at the same time 24 and in the same manner and with the same interest and penalties 25 as general taxes of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. (Sai 26 27 taxes as collected by the Los Angeles County Tax Collector for the City of Hermosa Beach.) 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 5. Any lots or parcels of land known as public property, as the same is defined in Section 22663, Part 2, Division 15, Streets and Highways Code, (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), hereinafter referred to which are included in the said assessment district, shall be omitted and exempt from the assessment to be made to covering the costs and expenses of said landscaping and street lighting appurtenances. SECTION 6. The landscaping and street lighting appurtenances contemplated by this Resolution of Intention shall be provided under the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972". (Now part 2 of Division 15, Section 22500 et. seq. of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California). SECTION 7. That Tuesday, June 14, 1994, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. hereby be appointed as the day and also the same be appointed as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the City of Hermosa Beach, California is hereby appointed as the place for hearing protests as to the question of approving and confirming the assessment district and the levying of the proposed assessment, to said district. SECTION 8. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized, designated and directed to give notice of said hearing in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 9. That the EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, circulated within the said City of Hermosa Beach, California, is hereby designated as the newspaper in which said notice shall be published. SECTION 10. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately; and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council of said City and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceeding of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITYCLERK 14 15 , CITY ATTORNEY 16 17 pworks/stres 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF SAID CITY MADE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION 94-5662 OF SAID COUNCIL. HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1994-1995 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, did in Resolution No. 94-5662, adopted February 22, 1994, pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", (Part 2 of Division 15, Section 22500, et. seq. of the Street and Highways Code of the State of California), did require the Director of Public Works to make and file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in writing, presenting certain matters relating to the proposed installation of certain landscaping and street lighting appurtenances and the proposed maintenance thereof, including the maintenance of all parks and medians and street light fixtures and appurtenances throughout the City as contemplated under the provisions of said "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972"; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works, pursuant to the requirements of said City Council as expressed in Resolution No. 94-5662, and of said law, did make and on the 5th day of April, 1994, file in the Office of the City Clerk (who is ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of said City), his or her report in writing responsive to the requirements of said Resolution 94-5662 and of said law referred to in said Resolution No. 94-5662, and as contemplated under the provisions of said "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972"; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, said City Clerk has presented the said report to the City Council of said City, and said Council has proceeded to carefully examine, inspect and consider the said report and is satisfied with said report and with each and all of the items therein set forth; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the report of the Director of Public Works in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, bearing the date of the 5th day of April, 1994, which said report was prepared and filed pursuant to the requirements of the provisions of Resolution No. 94-5662 of the City Council of said City and in conformity with the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", (Part 2 of Division 15, Section 22500, et. seq. of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California) and which said report was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, in conformity with Section 22623 of said code on the 5th day of April, 1994, be and the same is hereby approved as so prepared, presented and filed. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council of said City and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. - 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: pworks/resstl - 3 - C LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 The following information details the improvements and maintenance currently allowed by the 1972 Act, the methodology of selecting an assessment formula, and a schedule showing the timing of events required to form a district. Improvements The 1972 Act has been extensively used in California for landscape and street lighting maintenance. In general, it allows cities to form an assessment district to fund maintenance and operations of the improvements listed below: The installation or planting of landscaping. The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, or other ornamental structures and facilities. The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including but not limited to traffic signals. The installation or construction of facilities appurtenant to the above items, such as, grading, clearing, removal of debris, installation of curb, gutters, walls, sidewalks, paving, water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. The installation of park or recreational improvements including land preparation, lighting, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms. The maintenance and/or servicing of the above which may include: repair, removal, or replacement of any part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and electric or water services. The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open space purposes. The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act. Incidental expenses related to the district which include: report preparation -plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment method preparation; printing, advertising, and noticing costs; county fees; assessment engineer and attorney fees; expenses incidental to the construction or maintenance of the improvements; and expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes. PLUS: Governor Wilson, on October 11, 1993, signed Senate Bill 527 which becomes effective on January 1, 1994. This legislation adds the "cleaning, ) ) sandblasting, and painting of improvements to remove or cover graffiti" -to the list of improvements that can be maintained with 1972 Act funds. March 28, 1994 City Council Meeting April 12, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 94-1106 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13.5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SIGNS, TO CREATE EXCEPTIONS FOR HISTORIC SIGNS AND FOR GRAND OPENINGS" Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 94-1106, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of March 22, 1994, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration, was amended, and was then introduced by the following vote: AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Pro Tempore Benz NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Edgerton ABSTAIN: None /✓ 44 a4711_101.--4 p Naoma Valdes, Deputy City Clerk Noted: 4 Stephen R. 1rrell, City Manager 2a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 94-1106 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13.5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SIGNS, TO CREATE EXCEPTIONS FOR HISTORIC SIGNS AND FOR GRAND OPENINGS WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 22, 1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Exceptions for historic signs from the nonconforming provisions of the sign ordinance will encourage the protection, preservation and long term maintenance of such signs, and contribute to preserving some of the historic landmarks of the city; B. Temporary exceptions for grand opening promotions from prohibitions for flags, pennants, balloons, and maximum sign area requirements are reasonable to help new businesses establish themselves and be successful in the City; C. The proposed amendments are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15311 of the State CEQA Guidelines, because the proposed amendments will effect the construction or placement of minor structures; on premises signs. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Add the following to Section 13.5-17, Nonconforming signs: "Exception. The above provisions may be waived by the Planning Commission for a sign or signs found to be of historic value. The Commission shall base its determination on a consideration of the following criteria: Age of sign - is it more than 25 years old; and Business it advertised - did the business or activity being advertised have some prominent place in the history of Hermosa Beach; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Appearance - does the sign have any attractive or memorable features? Do the sign features demonstrate any significant trend or period in the arts/architectural history? An exception may be granted to allow repair or replication of the sign by the procedure set forth in Section 13.5-20, Sign Review, sub -section (b) and (c). If an exception is granted, and in order to protect the historic character of the signs, no additional sign shall be permitted on the premises." SECTION 2. Add the following the Section 13.5-21, Temporary Signs. "(6) Exception for grand openings. The requirements of sub -section (1) regarding the allowable area for temporary signs, shall not apply to one time grand opening promotional events. Further, signs otherwise not allowed by this ordinance such as flags, pennants, and balloons may be permitted in conjunction with a promotional grand opening, but shall be subject to sub -section (2), duration of display, and (3) application." SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12TH day of April, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY p/p crssiq_n April 4, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 12, 1994 ORDINANCE: PROHIBITION OF DOGS ON BILTMORE PARK AND SCHOOL GROUNDS Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission that Council adopt the attached amendment to the Parks Regulations Ordinance that would prohibit dogs on active school grounds and at the Biltmore Park site. Background The City currently allows dogs on leash on most City parks (beaches excluded). On June 8, 1993, City Council adopted an amendment that prohibited dogs on the City's two (2) tot lots. At the Commission's request, this issue was reviewed at the March 17, 1994 meeting. Based on that discussion, the Commission recommended that the prohibition be extended to include schools and the Biltmore Park site. Analysis While our neighboring cities have more restrictive dog ordinances (i.e., Manhattan Beach allows dogs on the Greenbelt only and Redondo Beach only in the designated Dog Park), the Commission decided to continue focusing on limited prohibitions over a City wide approach at this time. This determination was made with the assumption that the majority of dog owners are conscientious about cleaning -up after their pets and in consideration of the limited open space areas in residential neighborhoods throughout the City. Staff and the Commissioners have fielded complaints from residents about special problems at the school sites (Hermosa Valley and Hermosa View) both with a lack of attention to leash laws and to cleaning -up fecal matter. With the same logic that applied to the tot lots, the Commission wishes to provide additional restrictions where the concentration of youngsters is the greatest. The Biltmore Park conceptual program (approved by Council at the March 22, 1994 meeting) requested that dogs not be allowed on the .9 acre site. This recommendation was made by the Commission due to the desire to preserve landscape elements on the park; to assist with the ease of maintenance; to remain consistent with ordinances at the beach; and to provide a peaceful locale for pedestrians. / 1 2b The Commission recognizes that just as some people are violating the existing ordinances, the possibility for non-compliance with the proposed amendment has to be considered. They believe, however, that by totally prohibiting dogs in these areas, enforcement efforts would be easier and that park visitors and school officials would be better able to point out restrictions to others. The parks that would still be open to dogs on leash include: • Clark Field • Hermosa Valley Greenbelt • Edith Rodaway Friendship Park • Valley Park • All parketten Other alternatives available to Council include: 1) Do not amend ordinance. 2) Add other parks to prohibition list. 3) Request additional information. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance adopted June 8, 1993 amending the Parks Regulations Section 22-3. March 17, 1994 Commission minutes. New Ordinance. Respectfully Submitted, Mary C/ ' . oney Com unity Resources Director/ Assistant City Manager 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93-1090 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. , WHEREAS, discussions regarding amending the Parks Regulations Generally section were held by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission on January 21, 1993; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to assure the safety of small children within the City's parks... THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE: SECTION 1. That Chapter 22 Section 22-3 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to add as follows: Section 22-3. ',Park regulations generally." 11 (w) .1171, Lead or let loose any dog on or off leash in Sea View (19th and Prospect) and Fort Lots -o -Fun (6th and Prospect) parks." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a, weekly newspaper 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June 1993. PRESIDENT,( of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa each, California. ATTEST:" APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I, Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 93-1090 was duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting held at the regular meeting place thereof on the 8th day of June, 1993, and was published in the Easy Reader on June 17, 1993. The vote was as follows: AYES: Benz, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None ABSENT: Edgerton ABSTAIN: None DATED: June 17, 1993 City Clerk PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 17, 1994 MEETING ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Crecy, Commissioners Koppel, McCurdy, Peirce Absent: Mitchell Staff Flaherty, Newsom, Rooney Flag Salute: Koppel APPROVAL OF MINUTES: (Feb. 17, 1994) Motion: "To approve as submitted." KoppelfMcCurdy All Ayes MATTERS FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION REQUEST FROM SOUTH BAY PROMISES GROUP Motion: "To approve request from the South Bay Promises Group for a six month reduction in rental fees ($60/mo)." Koppel/1\4cCurdy All Ayes A representative spoke on behalf of the South Bay Promises Group. REVIEW OF CITY'S REGULATIONS REGARDING DOGS IN CITY PARKS Motion: "To prohibit dons on all School District property and Biltmore Park." Koppel/Peirce All Ayes PLACEMENT OF SUNSITELTERS Item withdrawn by staff due to current status of lifeguard situation. PUBLIC COMMENT: Hollie Murray - 1775 Valley Dr. Bruce K. Menendez - 1420 Hermosa Ave. Charles Lapham - 1255 - 10th St. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE NO.. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, discussions regarding amending the Parks Regulations Generally section were held by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission on March 17, 1994; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to assure the safety of children within the City's parks. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE: SECTION 1. That Chapter 22 Section 22-3 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to add as follows: Section 22-3. "Park regulations generally." "(x) Lead or let loose any dog on or off leash on active school grounds and at the Biltmore Park site." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1994. day of PRESIDENT, of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of.Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY April 4, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING STREET CLOSURES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS PURPOSE: TO ALLOW TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Staff Recommendation 1. To introduce the attached ordinance to amend the Municipal Code to allow temporary closure and use of public streets for special events such as street festivals. 2. To adopt the attached resolution setting forth the minimum requirements to be included in permits issued for special events that require street closures. Background At the meeting of 12/14/93 the City Council adopted an ordinance and resolution to amend the Municipal Code and to establish procedures and minimum requirements to allow temporary use of public sidewalks for sidewalk sales. Temporary use and closure of public streets was not addressed at that time as it had not been sufficiently investigated by staff. In addition to sidewalk sales, the Planning Commission also recommended that the temporary use and closure of streets for special events and street festivals be allowed (e.g. the biannual "Fiesta De Las Artes," and the weekly Farmer's Market). The Chamber of Commerce is also requesting approval of a business promotion event during the Women's professional Volleyball tournament on June 5, 1994, which would include closure of Pier Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive (see attached letter). Analysis Staff is recommending that the Municipal Code, Section 29-7, be further amended to also allow temporary use and closure of streets. This type of temporary use of the public right-of-way differs from sidewalk sales, as it involves the complete closure of streets, and use of the street by businesses and/or arts and crafts dealers from outside the city. Obviously the code should be written to accommodate the biannual "Fiesta De Las Artes", and the weekly Farmer's Market, but the Council needs to consider whether opportunities for additional special events or street festivals, such as that being requested by the Chamber of Commerce, should be allowed. Staff is recommending that the ordinance accommodate the existing events, and also allow opportunities for other special events that would be enhanced by using public streets. For example, closure of Pier Avenue west of Hermosa Avenue could occur during such events as the Volleyball Tournaments. Nivicaft ct4(; Amy Am_rani Prepared y: Public Works Director 1//Kern Rob rtson, Associate Planner C! CUR: Ste• en R. Burrell City Manager Attachments 1. Chamber of Commerce Request 2. C.C. staff report/minutes 12/14/93 KR:p/pcsrff 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE AND CLOSURE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND STREET FESTIVALS WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on April 12, 1994, to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The Chamber of Commerce has requested the City to allow street festivals to promote business activity and attract customers to the downtown area; B. Amending the Municipal Code is necessary to allow street closures to allow these temporary events; C. While the City Council supports temporary street festivals; in order to protect the interests of the City, in terms of liability coverage, maintenance of emergency access and circulation of pedestrians and vehicles, it is necessary to regulate the use of public streets for temporary events and to require the issuance of a permit; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby ordains that that the Municipal Code be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 29-7 of the Municipal Code to add the following exception as a third paragraph: "Exception. Temporary use and closure of public streets may be allowed for specials events, street festivals, farmer's markets or street fairs when authorized by the Director of Public Works by special permit as part of a temporary special or promotional event. A permit shall be obtained by each participating business or vendor, or a blanket permit. may be obtained by a sponsoring organization specifically - 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 listing all participants. The participating businesses and the sponsoring organization shall take responsibility for compliance with the terms of said permit. Fees, conditions and guidelines based on uniform, objective criteria, for obtaining such a permit shall be set by the City Council, by resolution, with fees sufficient to cover the City's cost of issuing the permit. The Director of Public Works will establish the standard conditions of said permit to protect the public health, safety, and welfare." SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY p/ccrsff 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE AND CLOSURE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND STREET FESTIVALS WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on April 12, 1994, to determine the procedures and minimum requirements for issuing permits for the temporary use and closure or public streets and made the following findings: A. The Chamber of Commerce has requested the City to allow street festivals to promote business activity and attract customers to the downtown area; B. Amending the Municipal Code is necessary to allow street closures to allow these temporary events; C. While the City Council supports temporary street festivals; in order to protect the interests of the City, in terms of liability coverage, maintenance of emergency access and circulation of pedestrians and vehicles, it is necessary to regulate the use of public streets for temporary events and to require the issuance of a permit; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby established the following permit procedures and minimum requirements: Permits shall be issued by the Director of Public Works subject to approval of the policy of the City Council to allow temporary use and closure of public streets for special events, street festivals or fairs which shall include, at a minimum, the following requirements to protect the public health, safety, and welfare: a. A hold harmless agreement shall be executed b. Certificate of insurance of $1,000,000 shall be provided adding the City as one of the insured. Each participating business and/or vendor shall carry public liability, personal injury and property damage insurance, or blanket liability coverage for all participating businesses/vendors shall be provided by a responsible organization. c. A traffic management plan shall be provided to minimize traffic and parking interruption; to ensure proper signs are provided before and during the event to direct traffic flow; and, to ensure emergency access to all property and fire hydrants is maintained. d. A minimum of five foot passage shall be maintained at all times. e. The public right-of-way shall be maintained and cleaned by each participant, and shall be cleaned at the conclusion of the event by the participants and/or the sponsoring organization. f. There shall be approval by the majority of the businesses on the street where the temporary event/street closure is to occur. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1994: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/ccordff 2 i HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (310) 376.0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594 Mayor Sam Edgerton and Ambers ' cif the City Council City . f Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 March 7, 1994 RE: Request for Approval of Business Promotion Event tear Mayor Edgerton and Members of the Council: In -its ongoing effort to promote all businesses in Hermosa Beach, the Chamber of Commerce has undertaken development of a new event to further this goal.. Instead:.of being inconvenienced during the Women's Professional Volleyball Tournament on Sunday, June 5, downtown business and business throughout the city can benefit from the large numbers of visitors to cur city. Following are our requests from the City and the event. outline which includes the Chamber's responsibilities. .We are requesting the following items for approval: 1) Closure of Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue tc Beach Drive from 7 am to 6 pm.on'Sunday June 5, 1994. 'Use of four white PVC barricades from 7 am to 6 pm on the event day. The Chamber will assume responsibility for pick up and delivery,of barricades back to the City Yard. Event Outline Sponsor: Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Zvent:: "Pier Promenade Street Scene" Purpose: Promotion of all Hermosa Beach businesses Datet Siunday, June 5, 1994 Time: 9 am to 4 pm U a WWI 1+01 MOM May 4, 1994 Page Two Location: Vendors: Cost: Exhibit Spaces: Number of Spaces: Assign- ment of Spaces: Food: Vendor Recruit- ment: Muz iC: Site Info: Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive. Open to pedestrians, closed to vehicular traffic. (See site map) Open to all Hermosa Beach businesses ("locals only"). Not an arts and crafts event. Farmer's Market vendors may participate if items are not competitive with lower Pier Avenue businesses. Free to public. Exhibit space free to lower Pier Avenue businesses, $20 space fee for other Chamber members, $30 space fee for non-members. Storefront businesses on lower Pier Avenue can reserve display space on the sidewalk directly in front of their business. Other businesses can reserve spaces along the median on Pier Avenue with displays facing storefronts. A total of 30 exhibit spaces will be offered on both sides of the.median. An additional 20 sidewalk spaces will be available to businesses located on Pier Avenue. - Chamber staff will assign display space to businesses not located ori lower Pier Avenue. Assignment will be made based upon type of business, style of display and overall visual impact of the event. Participating restaurants on lower Pier. Avenue will have Outdoor cafe seating, following all health department and ABC requirements. A limited number of food cart vendors will be allowed if products do not compete with food sales of .restaurants and businesses on lower Pier Avenue. We will encourage restaurants to rent umbrella tables, chairs aid outdoor space designation equipment in coordinating colors and styles to achieve a uniform look. All Hermosa Beach businesses will be contacted through direct mail of Hermosa Sun (Chamber newspaper) to all business license holders located in the city, media releases, flyers,.posters and telephone calls by Chamber volunteers and staff. Non -amplified, strolling musicians will provide event entertainment. All entertainment must be auditioned and pre -approved by Chamber staff. No stage entertainment. The Chamber information booth will be set up at the intersection of Pier & Hermosa Avenues and will be staffed throughout the event by paid and volunteer staff. Site management during the event will be provided by paid and volunteer staff. -2- March 4, 1994 Page Three Event A banner announcing the event day, time and name can Promotion: be attached below the Women's Pro Volleyball tournament banner which hangs at the Pier & Hermosa Avenue intersection prior to the event. Insurance: The Chamber will provide city -required $1 million liability insurance naming the City as additional insured. Site The Chamber will hire Specialty Maintenance to Cleanliness: provide clean up service and trash receptacle emptying during the event and street and sidewalk clean up at the conclusion of the event following vendor tear down. The Chamber will arrange to have 25 temporary trash receptacles on the site. No Parking The Chamber will provide the City with the required Signs: number of "No Parking" signs.to be posted prior to and during the event. The signs will be laminated and plastic ties will be provided to prevent 'unauthorized sign removal. Traffic Cne barricade will be placed on Beach Drive south of Management: Pier Avenue, One manned barricade will be placed north of Beach Drive with a sign indicating through traffic into the Mermaid parking lot for customers only. Two barricades will be placed on Pier Avenue to prevent westbound traffic ori Pier Avenue. • City Costs: The Chamber will reimburse the City for all direct costs resulting from the event. We respectfully request this letter be placed on the March 22, 1994 council agenda under "Written Communications". Thank you for consideration of our request. We are hopeful that the approval of our request will be forthcoming. This event will help us in achieving our mutual goal of economic vitality in Hermosa Beach. Sincerely, HERbMOSA BEACH CH mBER OF COMMERCE Carol Hunt Executive Director cc: Amy Amirani Mary Rooney BEACH DRIVE TRAND 0 0 0 )4enne,ey5 riktkilkite Lrilhfh.A.)-se Pier 1`.4arke4 BEACH DRIVE 2 eanti. Iva Rue. t J usk Pier 5 Lul ice, Crean, Ava nit Jewelers c.4 s Fashions L.ovy Dovy Sponcict, Gyre. Giwh(e, 04. BeacIl Store Pa.cif* 5er eettp rih+ INFQ unq z / I7 HERMOSA AVE. PIER AVENUE WEST P) Cad E/ / - PIER AVENUE December 8, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting Hermosa Beach City Council December 14, 1993 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-9 AND MUNICIPAL AND ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS PURPOSE: TO ALLOW TEMPORARY OUTSIDE MERCHANDISE SALES AND OUTSIDE DINING INCLUDING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR SIDEWALK SALES AND STREET FESTIVALS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Planning Commission and Staff Recommendations 1. To introduce the attached ordinance to amend the Municipal Code to allow temporary use of public sidewalks for sidewalk sales and to amend the zoning ordinance to allow temporary outdoor uses on private property in conjunction with such events. 2. To adopt the attached resolution setting forth the minimum requirements to be included in permits issued for a sidewalk sales. 3. To further amend the Municipal Code to address the use of streets for major street festivals (e.g. "Fiesta De Las Artes"). Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of December 7, 1993, based on input from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission recommended the establishment of procedures and text amendments to allow sidewalk sales subject to a permit. This includes text amendments to Municipal Code and the zoning code. The Commission further recommended that amendments to the Municipal Code be added to address the temporary use of streets for such events as street festivals (e.g. the biannual "Fiesta De Las Artes.") The City Council, at their meeting of October 12, 1993, adopted a resolution of intent to direct the Planning Commission, with input from the DBAEDAC, to study the request of the Chamber of Commerce to allow sidewalk sales. For further background please refer to the attached minutes and staff reports. Analysis The proposed Ordinance would amend the Municipal Code, Section 29-7, to allow temporary use of streets and sidewalks subject to a permit obtained from the City Council for sidewalk sales. Further, it would amend the zoning ordinance, Section 8-5(2), to - 1 - 6 allow temporary outdoor uses on private property in conjunction with authorized sidewalk sales. In regards to the additional amendments requested by the Planning Commission to address street festivals, the Public Works Department did not have the time to investigate the appropriate way to amend the Streets and Sidewalks section of the Municipal code. Staff believes this should be addressed at a later date so as not to delay these provisions to allow sidewalk sales. For further analysis please refer to the attached Planning Commission Staff Report. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Qm C LtAA Amy Ainirani Public Works Director Maryeftw y - Int= im City Manager Attachment Associate Planner 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Proposed Resolution 3. P.C. Staff Report and Minutes 4. DBAEBAC Report and Minutes 5. C.C. Resolution of Intent urther Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 94-1099, a apended by Mr. Newton, and clarified by Council, on pave th.ee of the Ordinance (page 10 of the staff repo ), Sec•ion 2, paragraph (d), at the end of the underl ned sent ce in line 23 1/2, that reads, "... the amou•t of expan-'on.", to add the words, ", subject to the .rovi- sions 'f Section 1152.5."; on page three of e Or- dinance (page 10 of the staff report), Section , para- graph (e , after the first word of line 26 /2, "... demand," -dd the words, "there shall be no additional parking re. irements for lots under 10,000 =quare feet except to th- extent there is a change in t - floor area to lot area .tio in excess of 1:1, ..."; and, on page four of the e'dinance (page 11 of the staff report), Section 4, in t•e middle of line 8 1/2 at reads, "... , the private pa ty", to add the words, "shall pay said fee as requested ,y the Downtown Busi -ss Area Enhance- ment District Ad sor Commission.", and delete the remainder of the se tence. Motion Benz, seco • Bowler. he motion carried unanimously. Further Action: To wai e furt r reading of Ordinance No. 94-1099, entitled, n ORDN ANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, END THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, IN REGARDS TO OFF -ST OT PARRING REQUIREMENTS, TO ESTABLISH NEW AND LESS RESTO CTIVE PARRING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA, AND,OT ER MODIFICATIONS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSIONS AND CiANGE OF USE, AND RECOMMENDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVOIDECLA TION." Motion Benz, second Oaks. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: None Proposed Action: o refer to the Down own Business Area Enhancement Dist ict Advisory Commissi'n to reduce the in -lieu fee to $1,500 or to determi - a reasonable reduction. Motion Benz, cond Oakes. The motion was discussed and then amended/by the maker and second to the otion shown below. Final Ac on: To direct that the in -lieu f-- be re- analyzed by the Downtown Business Area Enhancem-nt Dis- trict A visory Commission, this being its primar juris- dictio , to determine an appropriate in -lieu fee :•nd to study other financial alternatives in order to c eate new arking. Mo on Benz, second Oakes. The motion carred U nimously. 6. SPECIAL STUDY 93-9 AND MUNICIPAL AND ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ALLOW TEMPORARY OUTSIDE MERCHANDISE SALES City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8376 • OUTSIDE DINING, INCLUDING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF WA , FOR SIDEWALK SALES AND STREET FESTIVALS. Memor dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach and • • is Work • Director Amy Amirani dated December 8, 1993. up- pleme tal information from Planning Department dated Decemb- 14, 1993. Planning 'irector Schubach presented the staff eport. Public Wor s Director Amirani responded o Council questions. The public hearing ope ed at 10:05 P.M. Coming orward to ad- dress the Council on thi item was: Parker Herr'ott - 224 24th Street, opposed to side- walk gi - away; questioned t e legal required width of . sidewalk; said h. felt it cheapened the City. The public hearing closed at •:08 P.M. Action: To approve t e Planni • Commission and staff recommendation to intr••uce Or:inance No. 94-1100, as amended on page 2 of the Ordi•ance, Section 1, line 9, to read, "... authorized b t e Director of Public Works by special permit ..."; li.- 14 to read, "Fees, condi- tions and guidelines ba -d on uniform, objective criteria for obtaining suc . permit ..."; and, line 15 to read, "... permit. The Di -ctor of Public Works will establish the standard c-•nditi•ns ...". And, with the understanding that sta will return with a written policy. Motion Oakes, seco : Benz. The motion carried unanimously. Action: To waive 1100, entitled, " BEACH, CALIFORNIA ZONING ORDINANCE PUBLIC SIDEWALK DISPLAY AND OU ADOPTION OF AN Motion Benz, AYES: NOES: rther reading o ORDINANCE OF T TO AMEND THE MUNI TEXT TO ALLOW TEMPO D OTHER OUTDOOR AREAS DOOR DINING FOR SIDEWALK ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DEC econd Mayor Edgerton. Ordinance No. 94 - CITY OF HERMOSA PAL CODE AND THE RY USE OF THE FOR MERCHANDISE SALES AND THE RATION." Be , Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton N. e Action: o adopt Resolution No. 93-5647, enti ed, "A RESOLUTI'N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ERMOSA BEACH T ESTABLISH PROCEDURES AND MINIMUM REQUIR.MENTS FOR PE ITS TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE OF SIDEWALKS FOR MER- CHAND E DISPLAY AND OUTDOOR DINING AS PART OF SIDEWALK SALE .11, as amended on page 1 of the Resolution, lite 11, to read, "Subject to approval of the policy of the City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8377 AND OUTSIDE DINING, INCLUDING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY, FOR SIDEWALK SALES AND STREET FESTIVALS. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach and Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 8, 1993. Sup- plemental information from Planning Department dated December 14, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report. Public Works Director Amirani responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 10:05 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on this item was: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, opposed to side- walk give away; questioned the legal required width of a sidewalk; said he felt it cheapened the City. The public hearing closed at 10:08 P.M. Action: To approve the Planning Commission and staff recommendation to introduce Ordinance No. 94-1100, as amended on page 2 of the Ordinance, Section 1, line 9, to read, "... authorized by the Director of Public Works by special permit ..."; line 14 to read, "Fees, condi- tions and guidelines based on uniform, objective criteria for obtaining such a permit ..."; and, line 15 to read, "... permit. The Director of Public Works will establish the standard conditions ...". And, with the understanding that staff will return with a written policy. Motion Oakes, second Benz. -The motion carried unanimously. Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 94- 1100, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE OF THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND OTHER OUTDOOR AREAS FOR MERCHANDISE DISPLAY AND OUTDOOR DINING FOR SIDEWALK SALES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: None Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5647, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE OF SIDEWALKS FOR MER- CHANDISE DISPLAY AND OUTDOOR DINING AS PART OF SIDEWALK SALES.", as amended on page 1 of the Resolution, line 11, to read, "Subject to approval of the policy of the City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8377 } City Council ...", with the understanding that staff will return with a written policy. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. he meeting recessed at 10:23 P.M. e meeting reconvened at 10:33 P.M. and returned the order th- agenda to item No. 1. MUNIC PAL MATTERS 7. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO 9ONDUCT A WER AND STORM DRAIN STUDY, FOR AN AMOUNT 9F $44,000 AUTHORIZE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE"NECESSARY C GES WITHIN THE APPROVED BUDGET. Mem • andum from Publ.]. Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 7, 1993. Public Wo ks Director Amirani presented he staff report and respon•ed to Council questions. Action: To a'•rove the staff recomm ndation to; 1) award the ontract to ITX Tech ologies to conduct a sewer and torm drain stu•', for an amount of $44,000 and authorize the Drector of Public Works to make necesry changes •ithin the approved bud- get; and, 2) authorize the Ma or to = ecute and the City Clerk to attest the con•ract subject to approval by the City Attorney. Motion Bowler, second Ma 'r Edgerton. The motion car- ried unanimously. At 10:45 P.M. the order of the .genda •s suspended to go to item No. 10 as requested by Acting 'ity Manag-r Rooney. 8. ADOPTION OF RESOLU ON APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDER- STANDING BETWEEN E CITY OF HERMO BEACH AND THE HER- MOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIAtION, OFFICERS AND SERGEANTS' BARG INING UNIT. Memoran••m from Personnel Director Rober• Blackwood dated Decembe 8, 1993. Personnel Di.ector Blackwood presented th- staff report and respon•-d to Council questions on both item No. 8 and 9 as e Council had agreed to hear them ogether. Action: To approve the staff recommendation •• adopt Resolu►ion No. 93-5650, entitled, "A RESOLUTION •F THE CITY 'OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIF** IA, TO A.OPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HE• OSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION OFFICERS AND S •- GEANTS BARGAINING UNIT.", that includes negotiate changes of: 1) no cost of living increase in base salary; City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8378 April 4, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 13, NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission Recommendation To amend Article 13, as follows: a) To add a definition and procedure to determine what constitutes wall removal b) To amend the language of the "intent" sections 13-3 and 13-7, including criteria for allowing significant removal of existing structures, and other clarifications c) To eliminate the allowance for any remodeling or expansion of nonconforming residential uses in a commercial zone Background At their meeting of February 19, 1994, the Planning Commission took final action to recommend the subject amendments. The final recommendation was a result of several previous public hearings and discussions on this matter, dating back to July of 1993. The subject study was initiated by the Planning Commission on July 20, 1993, because of concerns of how Article 13 applied to exceptionally old buildings, and buildings with unknown existing damage. The concerns arose due to specific projects where demolition work revealed previously unforseen damage to the structures. The study was also initiated because the Commission wished to clarify some provisions of Article 13, and to add a clear definition of what constitutes wall removal. For further background please refer to the previous staff reports and minutes. Analysis The following summarizes the main points of the proposed amendments: WALL REMOVAL: The proposed text changes include added language to add a definition and procedure to determine what constitutes wall removal. It states that when any part of a wall is removed it is considered demolished, unless one surface of the wall and the supporting frame is kept intact, and describes how lineal feet of wall removal is calculated. - 1 - 4 This language is taken from a policy statement adopted by the Planning Commission on September 21, 1993. Previously, it was not clear what constituted removal of existing walls. and the Commission was concerned that leaving only the wall framing was being allowed. SIGNIFICANT AND UNEXPECTED STRUCTURAL REMOVAL: The intent portion of both Sections 13-3 and 13-7 are amended to be less rigid in cases where significant or greater removal of the structure becomes necessary because of existing damage. Rather than prohibiting the project when these conditions are found, the amended language gives the Planning Commission discretion to allow more extensive demolition. RESIDENTIAL USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES: The amended language for Section 13-3, regarding nonconforming uses, is amended to prohibit remodeling and expansion of nonconforming residential uses in commercial zones. This amendment carries out a policy contained in the revised Land Use Element. The amended text also includes some clarifications. For the analysis please refer to the previous Planning Commission staff reports. Michel' Schubach Plan ing Director Qe Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Attachments -7zc.�IL 2?4:2 AL 4 n Rob r son, Associate Planner 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. P.C. Staff Reports/Minutes 3. P.C. Resolution recommending text amendments 4. P.C. Policy Statement 5. Hermosa Beach zoning code Article 13 6. Manhattan Beach nonconforming ordinance 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, IN REGARDS TO NONCONFORMING USES AND BUILDINGS, FOR PURPOSES OF CLARIFICATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 12, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend portions of Article 13 and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Rules regarding the allowable remodeling and expansions to nonconforming residential uses and buildings need clarification, including a definition and procedure for determining what constitutes wall removal; clarification on the allowable expansions for nonconforming residential uses in commercial zones; and other clarifications to minimize ambiguity and confusion; B. The proposed amendments are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because the proposed amendments are for clarification purposes only and there is no possibility they may have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby ordains that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Eliminate Section 13-2, Nonconforming use of a conforming building SECTION 2. Amend Section 13-3, including sub -sections (a) and (b) to read as follows: "Section 13-3. Nonconforming uses of-a-ne 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 The nonconforming commercial or manufacturing use of a conforming or nonconforming building, and any nonconforming residential use in a commercial or manufacturing zone and any nonconforming use of land may be continued, provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded or enlarged nor shall any structural alteration be made except those required by law. (Regulations for uses nonconforming to parking are contained in Article 11.5) If such nonconforming use is vacated or discontinued for ninety (90) consecutive days or more, the nonconforming use will be deemed abandoned and any future use of such building or structure shall conform to the provisions of the zone in which it is located. Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior and exterior walls are considered minor and not structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to plumbing, electrical wiring, or such similar work, and those required by law or as determined by the Building official are not structural alterations A nonconforming residential use of a conforming or nonconforming residential structure in a residential zone may be remodeled and/or expanded when it is in compliance with the intent, purpose, standards and requirements as specified in the following: Intent and purpose of this section is to allow remodeling and expansion to residential structures in residential zones, which are in sound condition, in a manner that provided that the remodeling or expansion does not ultimately result in significant removal of existing structures. Where a structure is significantly -damaged by dry rot, termites, or similar damage and removal of significant portions of the structure is necessary, recommended, or becomes necessary during the demolition process the owner of the property or the agent shall seek from the planning commission approval to increase the extent of the demolition prior to commencing such work. The intent of this ordinance is to limit the amount of remodeling and expansion permitted where these conditions are present and only after review and approval by the Planning commission of the project and their satisfaction that the following criteria are met: • Reasonable efforts have been made to minimize or reduce existing nonconformities where feasible; and, • Existing nonconformities to remain are minor in nature and prevalent or common for the neighborhood; and, • The project poses no threat or harm or is in any way detrimental to surrounding property. All structures shall require a termite and dry rot inspection by a ben -a -fide licensed company, to determine amount of structural removal, if any, that will be necessary because of damage. (a) The following portions of the existing structure may be removed: (1) When adding additional stories, portions of the roof as necessary may be removed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (2) When adding to any side of a structure, walls may be removed to enlarge existing rooms, and/or to provide interior access as necessary for logical expansion of the existing structure. A maximum combinationof ten (10) percent of the existing lineal feet of exterior walls, as described below aedief and a maximum of ten (10) percent of floor area may be removed whether necessitated by the termite and dry rot inspection or by the remodeling, or both. (3) When any portion of a wall is demolished the corresponding lineal feet of that part of the wall shall be considered removed, unless the supporting frame and one surface of the wall is kept completely intact. For wall openings for the purpose of window and/or door installation, only the corresponding lineal feet of that portion of the removed wall shall count towards wall removal. Removal of any other portions of an existing structure other than those noted in subsections (1) and (2) above, shall require submittal of a demolition plan for review by the planning commission to determine whether the proposed plan meets the intent and purpose of this section. (b) Nonconforming buildings or conforming buildings containing nonconforming uses and structures may be expanded and/or remodeled to a cumulative maximum of fifty (50) percent of the replacement cost of the existing structure(s) as it existed on (e'er ctive date of ordinance No. 89 1008) October 26, 1989 and as determined by the building department which shall use current building valuation data provided by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). Interior remodeling shall be computed at fifty (50) percent of the ICBG building valuation for new construction. When computing remodeled area, i.e. relocation or removal of interior walls, fifty (50) percent of the total area affected by the relocation or removal of the wall shall be included in the computation. For example, if a wall between the dining room and kitchen is removed, the area counted includes fifty (50) percent of the dining room and kitchen together. (Refer to section 13-7 for example). For purposes of this section a wall shall be considered removed when any portion of it is demolished, unless the supporting frame and one surface of the wall is kept completely intact. Any garage expansion for vehicle parking shall not be included as part of the allowed fifty (50) percent expansion as noted in this section." SECTION 3. Amend Section 13-7, including sub -sections (a) and (b) to read as follows: "Section 13-7. Conforming uses of nonconforming structures Nonconforming commercial or manufacturing structures may be maintained and the use therein continued, provided that such building shall not be expanded or enlarged, nor shall any structural alteration be made except as required by law. (Regulations for structures nonconforming to parking requirements are contained in Article 11.5) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior and exterior walls are considered minor and not structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to plumbing, electrical wiring, or such similar work, and those required by law or as determined by the building director are not structural alterations A nonconforming residential structure may be remodeled and/or expanded when it is in compliance with the intent, purpose, standards and requirements as specified in the following: Intent and purpose of this section is to allow remodeling and expansion to nonconforming residential structures in sound condition, a manner that provided that the remodeling or expansion does not ultimately -result in significant removal of existing structures. Where a structure is significantly damaged by dry rot, termites, or similar damage and removal of significant portions of the structure is necessary, recommended, or becomes necessary during the demolition process this • the owner of the property or the agent shall seek from the planning commission approval to increase the extent of the demolition prior to commencing such work. The intent of this ordinance is to limit the amount of remodeling and expansion permitted where these conditions are present and only after review and approval by the Planning Commission of the project, and their satisfaction that the following criteria are met: • Reasonable efforts have been made to minimize or reduce existing nonconformities where feasible; and, • Existing nonconformities to remain are minor in nature and prevalent or common for the neighborhood; and, • The project poses no threat or harm or is in any way detrimental to surrounding property. • All structures shall require a termite and dry rot inspection by a bona -fide licensed company, to determine amount of structural removal, if any, that will be necessary because of damage. (a) The following portions of the existing structure may be removed: (1) When adding additional stories, portions of the roof as necessary may be removed (2) when adding to any side of a structure, walls may be removed to enlarge existing rooms, and/or to provide interior access as necessary for logical expansion of the existing structure. A maximum combination of thirty(30) percent of the existing lineal feet of exterior walls, as described below and/e-r and a maximum of thirty percent of floor area may be removed whether necessitated by the termite and dry rot inspection or by the remodeling, or both. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (3) When any portion of a wall is demolished the corresponding lineal feet of that part of the wall shall be considered removed, unless the supporting frame and one surface of the wall is kept completely intact. For wall openings for the purpose of window and/or door installation, only the corresponding lineal feet of that portion of the removed wall shall count towards wall removal. Removal of any other portions of an existing structure other than those noted in subsections (1) and (2) above, shall require submittal of a demolition plan for review by the planning commission to determine whether the proposed plan meets the intent and purpose of this section. (b) Nonconforming structures may be expanded and/or remodeled to a cumulative maximum of fifty (50) percent of the replacement cost of the existing structure(s) as it existed on (effective date of ordinance No. 89 1008) October 26, 1989 and as determined by the building department which shall use current building valuation data provided by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). Interior remodeling shall be computed at fifty (50) percent of the ICBO building valuation for new construction. When computing remodeled area„ i.e. relocation or removal of interior walls, fifty (50) percent of the total area affected by the relocation or removal of the wall shall be included in the computation. For example, if a wall between the dining room and kitchen is removed, the area counted includes fifty (50) percent of the dining room and kitchen together. For purposes of this section a wall shall be considered removed when any portion of it is demolished, unless the supporting frame and one surface of the wall is kept completely intact. Any garage expansion for vehicle parking shall not be included as part of the allowed fifty (50) percent expansion as noted in this section." SECTION 4. Amend Section 13-1 to read as follows: "Section 13-1. Nonconforming use limits other uses. While a nonconforming use exists on any lot, and it is the only use on the lot. no new use may be established thereon even though such other use would be a conforming use. While a nonconforming use occupies a portion of a lot or building with multiple uses no new use may be established within that portion of the lot or building which the existing nonconforming use occupies." SECTION 5. Amend the following definitions in the Definition section of the zoning ordinance to read as follows: "Sec. 239. Nonconforming building, or structure. "Nonconforming building" means a building, structure, or portion thereof, which was lawfully erected or altered and maintained, but which, . .. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 h:ccrsnon 29 o ee no longer conforms to the . , - • - _ zoning standards of the zone in which it is located." "Sec. 240. Nonconforming use. "Nonconforming use" means a use which was lawfully established and maintained but which, : .. • • ... ' . • , no longer conforms to the use regulations, or the lot area per dwelling unit regulations, of the zone in which it is located." SECTION 6. SECTION 7. SECTION 8. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY s BACKGROUND MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE. HERMOSA BEACH LIBRARY, POLICE DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. April 4, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT PURPOSE: TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE" INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission Recommendation To amend the zoning ordinance to to amend the definition for "building height" and to add a definition for "grade" from which building height is measured (see the attached ordinances). Background At their meeting of March 1, 1994, the Planning Commission voted to recommend an amendment to the definition of "building height" and to add a definition of "grade". The subject text amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission on July 20, 1993. Since that time the Commission has compared building height definitions from other cities, and considered suggestions of staff for a more detailed definition. For further background please refer to the staff reports and minutes. Analysis The proposed text amendment clarifies and only slightly modifies the existing definition of building height. It will require only moderate adjustments in the city's existing practice for determining building height (see the attached comparison of existing and proposed definitions). The two most notable changes are that the definition would no longer exclude the "building code required parapet fire wall" from the building height, and would no longer cause the height measurement to be lowered when grade is lowered as part of a project. This final recommended definition of the Commission is simple and includes a graphic to make it easy to understand. The Commission had earlier considered a more complex and fully detailed definition, which described how building height is measured (as set forth in the attached "Draft Resolution"), but instead chose a less cumbersome definition. Staff and the Commission are aware that the proposed definition does not directly address unusual lots with unusual topography (e.g. an extremely convex sloping lot). Since no specific language 1 is included to provide an alternative method for determining height in these rare situations, an applicant/developer would have the opportunity to appeal an interpretation of staff to the Commission or apply for a variance. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Interim Director of Building and Safety ;Ken Rob=rtson, Mar Assistant City Manager Attachments Associate Planner 1. Comparison chart existing/proposed definition 2. Proposed Ordinance 3. P.C. Staff Reports/Minutes 4. P.C. Resolution 5. Draft Resolution 6. Staff Prepared Diagrams (to support draft resolution) 7. Other city's definitions p/pcsrgrde 1 Building Height Definition comparison EXISTING CODE "Building height" means a vertical distance measured from the existing grade of a lot, adjacent to the exterior walls, from any portion of the building site covered by the building to the uppermost point of the roof, not including the building code required parapet fire wall. When the grade has been lowered, said vertical distance shall be measured from the finished grade. PROPOSED "Building Height" means a vertical distance of the building as measured from grade at property line corner points to the highest point of the building as shown in the following example: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ENVELOPE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PER BUILDING HEIGHT EXAMPLE Highest Point of Building QGrade Plane Based on lour corner points Actual Elevation Points from Topographical Survey Interpolated Point on Grade Plane 100 Sidewalk Street 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT IN REGARDS TO DEFINITIONS OF BUILDING HEIGHT AND GRADE AND THE ADOPTON OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 12, 1994, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. Definitions of building height and grade need clarification so the method applied to determining building height is better understood and more consistently applied; B. An environmental assessment has been conducted, and the proposed amendments have been found to qualify for an environmental negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby ordains that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION I. Amend the definition for Building Height and add a definition for "grade", as follows: "Sec. 208 Building Height "Building Height" means a vertical distance of the building as measured from grade at property line corner points, to the highest point of the building" incorporated herein, as shown in the following example. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ENVELOPE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PER BUILDING HEIGHT EXAMPLE Alley Highest Point of Building I� 0 Grade Plane Based on lour corner points IQ_Actual Elevation Points from Topographical Survey Interpolated Point on Grade Plane Sidewalk Street 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sec. 208.1 Grade "Grade", means the existing surface of the ground, either paved or unpaved." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: day of by the following vote: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY BACKGROUND MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE HERMOSA BEACH LIBRARY, POLICE DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. April, 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 SUBJECT: 1994 SELF CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1993 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP). LOCATION: CITYWIDE INITIATED BY PLANNING STAFF PURPOSE: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1993 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Background: Last year, the City of Hermosa beach met its requirements by adopting and implementing, a transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance and Land Use Analysis Program. The City also submitted their annual traffic counts and level of service (LOS) calculations for the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Blvd. Analysis: The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is a state -mandated program that became effective with voter approval of Proposition 111, the nine cent state gas tax increase, in June 1990. The purpose of this program is to address traffic congestion in a comprehensive manner by linking transportation, land use, and air quality decisions. All local jurisdictions are required to comply with the CMP in order to continue receiving their portion of state gas tax money generated pursuant to Proposition 111 and to preserve their eligibility for state and federal funding on local transportation projects. This year the City must submit a Local Implementation report and institute a new Development Tracking System beginning June 1, 1994. This information will become part of a county "deficiency planning procedure" which is currently under development. A self -certification resolution (attached) must be adopted by the City Council after a public hearing and transmitted to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) by May 1, 1994. The deficiency planning procedure will essentially function as an accounting ledger of credits and debits. Local programs that alleviate traffic congestion, i.e. traffic signal synchronization or alternate work schedules, become credits. Conversely, local actions that have the potential to increase congestion, i.e. approval of new developments that s The deficiency planning procedure will essentially function as an accounting ledger of credits and debits. Local programs that alleviate traffic congestion, i.e. traffic signal synchronization or alternate work schedules, become credits. Conversely, local actions that have the potential to increase congestion, i.e. approval of new developments that generate vehicle trips without providing any accompanying alleviation measures, become debits. If the number of debits exceeds the number of credits accumulated by a local jurisdiction, the MTA can make a determination that the local jurisdiction is in noncompliance with the CMP. The Local Implementation Report, which provides the baseline for jurisdictional credits, is simply an inventory of all transportation improvements implemented by the City or a developer between January 1, 1990 and April 30, 1994 that are eligible for transportation Improvement Credits under the CMP. The City must begin tracking all new development activity as of June 1, 1994. New development activity will be recorded into this tracking system at the time of building permit issuance, with the annual reporting period running from June 1 to May 31 of the next year. Cities will be required to report all building permits issued, broken down by the type of land use and provide the total number of dwelling units or gross square footage for each land use type. Any building permits issued for new development projects which do not include congestion mitigation strategies will generate debits based on the size of the development. The information from this tracking system will be used by the MTA to set the annual congestion mitigation goal for each city. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Attachments: ),Tv), 0( <AA) Lindsay L. irsh Planning Aide 1. Proposed Resolution of approval 2. 1994 CMP Local Conformance Requirements 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Resolution 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held a meeting on this matter and made the following findings: A. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the Congestion Management Program on November 17, 1993; and B. The adopted CMP requires that the MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and C. The adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of this CMP local implementation report by May 1, 1994; and D. The City Council held a noticed public hearing on April 12, 1994. NOW, THERFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, C 1 ORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1993 CMP. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. That by November 1, 1994, the City will forward to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority a list of regional transportation improvements implemented by the City since January 1, 1990, as the basis for establishing credits, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Countywide Deficiency Plan Chapter. That as of June 1, 1994, the City will begin tracking new development activity, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This information will be annually tabulated, as the basis for establishing the City's mitigation responsibility under the County Deficiency Plan. 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY LH/Resotemp.win 1 BACKGROUND STUDY 1994 CMP LOCAL CONFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS BACKGROUND: The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is a state -mandated program enacted by the state legislature with the passage of Assembly Bill 471 in 1989. California Government Code Sections 65070, 65072, 65081, and 65082 provide the legal framework for this program. The CMP implementation requirements became effective with voter approval of Proposition 111 in June 1990, which provided for a nine cent increase in the state gas tax over a five year period. The purpose of this program is to address traffic congestion in a comprehensive manner by linking transportation, land use and air quality decisions. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is the designated Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County. MTA has been charged with the responsibility of preparing the 1992 and 1993 CMPs, and the biennial updates thereafter. All local jurisdictions are required to conform to the CMP local requirements in order to continue receiving their portion of state gas money allocated by Section 2105 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Proposition 111), as well as to preserve their eligibility for state and federal funding for transportation projects. 1992 CMP Local Conformance Requirements The 1992 CMP required all local jurisdictions to adopt and implement a CMP Land Use Analysis Program and a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance. Certain jurisdictions were also required to provide annual traffic monitoring information to determine levels of service (LOS) on the CMP Highway System. Since Artesia Boulevard is part of the CMP Highway System, the City of Gardena was required to comply with all of these 1992 CMP local provisions. The Gardena City Council adopted Resolution No. 4181 on March 9, 1993, which amended the City's Environmental Quality Guidelines to comply with the CMP Land Use Analysis Program by: (a) requiring a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) to be performed on all projects involving an environmental impact report (EIR); and (2) notifying and consulting with MTA and any affected transit agencies whenever an EIR is being prepared. On March 23, 1993, the Gardena City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1465, which met the CMP legal requirements for a TDM ordinance by mandating the inclusion of standard commuter amenities for all 1 1 nonresidential developments of 25,000 square feet or greater. A Negative Declaration was prepared on March 11, 1993 for these local CMP actions in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition, the City contracted with MTA to conduct annual traffic counts and LOS calculations for the Artesia/Vermont and Artesia/Western arterial intersections, in compliance with the CMP Highway System monitoring requirements. By adoption of Resolution No. 4196 on July 13, 1993, the Gardena City Council made a determination that the City was in compliance with the 1992 CMP and approved the CMP Conformance Checklist. MTA has confirmed in writing that the City of Gardena met the local requirements of the 1992 CMP (correspondence dated August 12, 1993). 1993 CMP Local Conformance Requirements In contrast to the one year conformance process established in the 1992 CMP, the 1993 CMP outlines ongoing conformance procedures that incorporates a new deficiency planning process. CMP statute requires the preparation of deficiency plans when portions of the CMP Highway System does not meet the established LOS standard, as is the case with Los Angeles County. All local jurisdictions in Los Angeles County must participate in the countywide deficiency planning process regardless of their location or number of CMP intersections. The 1994 conformance procedures for local jurisdictions, mandated by the 1993 CMP, differs from the required procedures for subsequent years due to the need to set up the deficiency planning mechanism. For 1994, local CMP conformance will be based on meeting the following major program responsibilities, which must be confirmed in a self -certification resolution adopted at a noticed public hearing by May 1, 1994: 1. Continued implementation of the TDM ordinance. Any amendments to the TDM ordinance must be submitted to MTA prior to local adoption. 2. Continued implementation of the Land Use Analysis Program. Any amendments to the Land Use Analysis Program must be submitted to MTA prior to local adoption. 3. Continued collection of annual traffic counts and LOS calculations for selected arterial intersections in the CMP Highway System. 4. Completion of a Local Implementation Report. The 1994 Report is an inventory of all local transportation improvements implemented by the City between January 1, 1990 and April 30, 1994 that are eligible for 2 Transportation Improvement Credits (discussed in detail in Analysis section below). 5. Commitment to implement the new development activity tracking system by June 1, 1994 (discussed in detail in Analysis section below). Future CMP Local Conformance Requirements In comparison to the 1994 CMP local conformance requirements, the primary change for 1995 and subsequent years is that the Local Implementation Reports and self -certification resolutions are due by September 1, commencing with September 1, 1995. These subsequent Reports will include additional transportation improvements for which credit is claimed, an inventory of all new development activity over the preceding year, and the associated mitigation goals. ANALYSIS: The first three 1994 local CMP conformance requirements are simply continuations of the 1993 local requirements mandated by the 1992 CMP. The fourth requirement, submission of a Local Implementation Report, is the primary documentation for this year's conformance procedures. The fifth requirement, new development activity tracking, will be an ongoing process commencing on June 1, 1994. Local Implementation Report As stated above, the Local Implementation Report is an inventory of all local transportation improvements implemented by the City between January 1, 1990 and April 30, 1994 that are eligible for Transportation Improvement Credits. These credits will be used to offset transportation impacts or "debits" created by new development activities. All cities must maintain a positive annual balance of transportation credits over debits to remain in conformance with CMP. Local jurisdictions may claim credit for actions implemented through any funds programmed by the local jurisdiction, including Proposition 111, Propositions A & C local returns, and private contributions or assessments. Credit may not be claimed for projects funded through MTA discretionary sources, such as State Flexible Congestion Relief funds. If a local jurisdiction contributes partial funding (such as local matching) to a project, the credit would be based on the total credit value of the project prorated to the proportion contributed by the local jurisdiction. Appendix G of the 1993 CMP provides the Countywide Deficiency Plan Toolbox of Strategies. This Toolbox is a collection of various transportation improvements and the type of credits available for each improvement. The credit factors are expressed in various measurements, i.e. dwelling units, square footage, number of employees, street -miles, and must therefore be multiplied by the total scope of the transportation improvement to calculate the total credit value. The transportation improvements listed in this Toolbox are broken down into the general categories of Land Use Strategies, Capital Improvements & Transportation Systems Management, and Transportation Demand Management & Transit Services. The CMP provides a sample spreadsheet used to document the required information for each transportation improvement credit claim (Appendix E). The Local Implementation Report is therefore simply a collection of spreadsheets, one for each transportation improvement credit claim. The information required for each credit claim is listed on the spreadsheet, which includes the following: a. the Project Number, taken from the Toolbox of Strategies numbering sequence b. the Strategy name, taken from the Toolbox of Strategies c. a general description of the project d. the Project Scope (total size of the project in terms of the units of measurement for this project, such as dwelling units or street -miles) e. the Credit Factor (the unit of measurement used to determine credits for a particular strategy, i.e. 28 credits per 100 employees in target area) f. Project Credit Value (the Credit Factor multiplied by the Project Scope) g• Project Cost (total cost to implement the project) h. Local Participation (percentage of overall project funded by the local jurisdiction and/or private contributions, excluding contributions from other jurisdictions) i. Current Milestone (level of project completion used to determine credits, i.e. for TDM strategies, Milestone Type A applies, whereby individual projects may claim 40% of the total credit upon adoption of the enabling ordinance and the remaining 60% of total credits upon compliance with the program requirements) Milestone Factor (the percentage of total project credit value corresponding to the current milestone level. In cases where the project has reached the final milestone, i.e. compliance with program requirements, the milestone factor would equal the total credit that may be claimed for that project) j 4 k. Net Current Value (the net credit value that may be claimed for the project in the current Local Implementation Report, calculated by the Project Credit Value multiplied by the Local Participation multiplied by the Milestone Factor) 1. Total Credits Claimed (total credits claimed for all projects under a specific strategy) The Local Implementation Report for 1994 contains transportation improvement projects that have an aggregate total of 6,936.61 credits. New Development Activity Tracking The 1993 CMP mandates that all local jurisdictions must begin tracking all new development activity as of June 1, 1994. Any building permits issued for new developments that do not include congestion mitigation strategies will generate debits that are based on the size of the development. The information provided by this tracking system will be used by MTA in future years to calculate the annual congestion mitigation goal for each local jurisdiction. All new building permits issued between June 1, 1994 through May 31, 1995 (the first annual reporting period) must be broken down by type of land use, providing the total number of dwelling units or new gross square footage for each land use category. The reporting process provides three residential and twelve nonresidential land use categories. To calculate the total value of new development, it is necessary to multiply the applicable number of dwelling units or gross square footage by the specified _impact value for that particular land use, i.e. the single family land use impact value is 6.8 multiplied by the total number of dwelling units. The CMP does not permit substitution of alternate impact values. If the future land use of a building is unknown at the time of building permit issuance, the City shall select the most applicable land use category based on the project site's zoning designation. Mixed use projects shall be calculated based on the actual intended project use mix, with dwelling units calculated separately. Congestion debit points are calculated only for new square footage or additional dwelling units. Permits for alteration or remodel of existing square footage, or a change of use, are not counted as congestion points. Permits for temporary or seasonal uses, i.e. Christmas tree lots, are exempt from development activity reporting requirements. Adjustments to debit calculations may be claimed only for: (1) building permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period; or (2) demolition of any 5 structure within the reporting period. Adjustments to debit calculations from previous reporting periods will need to be claimed as credits on future annual reports. The following types of development projects are exempted from the calculations of new development activities. These projects, however, must still be tracked and reported to MTA as exempted development activity: a. Low/Very Low Income Housing Projects b. High density residential projects located within one- quarter mile of a fixed rail passenger station c. Mixed use projects located within one-quarter mile of a fixed rail passenger station d. Development agreements with_a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989 e. Reconstruction of buildings or structures damaged from the April 1992 riots f. Any federal, state or county agency project that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and discretionary approvals Deadline Extensions Due to Earthquake In an effort to support the recovery efforts from damages caused by the January 17 Northridge earthquake, MTA has recently made the following adjustments to the following local conformance deadlines: a. The annual CMP highway monitoring requirement for traffic counts and LOS calculations on selected arterial intersections in the CMP Highway System has been suspended for 1994. This requirement is suspended only for 1994; it will remain in force for subsequent years. b. The Local Implementation Report deadline has been extended for six months to November 1, 1994. However, the local self -certification resolution remains due by May 1, 1994 and the new development tracking activity must still begin by June 1, 1994. c. Building permits for reconstruction of buildings damaged by the earthquake will not be subject to CMP deficiency plan requirements. While this deadline extension means that the City need only adopt the self -certification resolution at a publicly noticed hearing and submit to MTA by May 1, 1994, the City's internal CMP planning 6 process has been well under way for several months and the Local Implementation Report was near completion when this deadline extension was announced. For this reason and for the sake of expediency, staff is presenting both the self -certification resolution and Local Implementation Report for review by the Planning Commission and later adoption by the City Council prior to May 1, 1994 in order to remain on the original schedule. Environmental Review Process The 1994 local conformance procedures are a continuation of the local CMP program that was initiated last year with the adoption of a TDM ordinance and Land Use Analysis Program resolution. As part of the City's CMP program, the 1994 local conformance requirements and all subsequent local CMP activities are covered by the Negative Declaration prepared in March 1993. Memorandum DATE: April 4, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Mary C. Rooney, Asst. City Manager RE: MultiVision's response to City Council resolution 94-5666 Recommendation: To receive and file MultiVision's report. At the March 22, 1994 City Council Meeting, staff recommended that Council adopt a resolution ordering MultiVision to roll back rates for basic cable service from $19.60 to $18.07 per month retroactive to September 1, 1993. These recommendations were based on the analysis presented by CSG Associates, the City's Cable Television consultants. While acknowledging a minor typographical error in the staff report (misnaming a MultiVision tier), CSG stands firm in its defense of the rate rollback as presented at the March meeting. MultiVision has presented the attached response which represents their official administrative appeal to the Council's decision. As stated in the previous staff report, the FCC will make final determinations of the appropriateness of the City's order and if there are inconsistencies with FCC regulations, will inform the City accordingly. Concur: &4/40/ Charles Vose, City Attorney 1 Before the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 In the Matter of ) ML MEDIA PARTNERS, L.P. ) TRADING AS MULTIVISION CABLE TV ) Hermosa Beach, California ) CA ID #0310 ) Basic Service Tier ) March 22, 1994 City Decision ) RESPONSE OF ML MEDIA PARTNERS, L.P. TRADING AS MULTIVISION CABLE TV TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- 5666 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DISAPPROVING IN PART RATES AND CHARGES FOR THE BASIC SERVICE TIER, INCLUDING COMMENTS WHY REFUNDS SHOULD NOT BE ORDERED AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DECISION ML Media Partners, L.P., trading as MultiVision Cable TV ("MultiVision") provides cable television and communications services to the City of Hermosa Beach, FCC CA ID #0310 (the "City") pursuant to a nonexclusive cable television franchise granted by the City. MultiVision hereby responds to the City's Resolution No. 94-5666 disapproving, in part, the rates for basic cable service, and MultiVision hereby comments why the City should not order refunds, and also requests the City to reconsider and reverse its disapproval of MultiVision's basic cable service rate. 74173.2 - 033194 1 I. BACKGROUND On or about October 17, 1993, the City was certified by the FCC to regulate the rates of MultiVision's Basic Service Tier and associated equipment. The City subsequently provided MultiVision with written notice of such certification and requested MultiVision to submit its FCC 393. MultiVision timely submitted its FCC 393 to the City on or about November 30, 1993. On December 8, 1993 the City issued an order pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §76.933(b) tolling the 30 day deadline in which it was required to make a rate determination, and providing the City with an additional 90 days in which to review and consider information from interested parties, such that the City's rate review period was extended to March 29, 1994. On or about February 9, 1994, the City requested MultiVision to respond to twelve questions related to the FCC 393 it had submitted. On or about February 16, 1994, MultiVision responded to the City's request by letter, noting that the information sought by the City was essentially included in the Deloitte & Touche, Independent Certified Public Accountants report ("D&T Report) already included with MultiVision's FCC 393 submission to the City, and by extending an invitation to the City to meet with MultiVision staff to review and discuss the records used by MultiVision in preparing its FCC 393. On or about February 28, 1994 the City sent MultiVision a letter further requesting MultiVision to respond to the twelve questions in writing. On March 4, 1994, in 74173.2 - 033194 2 cooperation with the City's request, MultiVision answered the City's questions by letter in writing, and referenced the sections of its FCC 393 and the D&T Report where the requested information was located and/or explained, and MultiVision further provided additional documentation and expanded explanations in response to the City's specific. inquiries (the "Letter").1 On March 22, 1994, at the City Council's request, MultiVision representatives appeared before the Council at a public meeting and responded to all questions then posed by the Council related to the regulated Basic Service Tier and associated equipment, as well as to MultiVision's non-regulated Super Cable collective package and a -la -carte offerings. The City Council then adopted by affirmative vote its Resolution No. 94-5666 disapproving in part MultiVision's basic service rates. On or about March 28, 1994 MultiVision received from the City the 1 MultiVision would like to correct a misstatement made in the March 10, 1994 document prepared by City staff entitled "Determination of Basic Cable TV Rates" ("Staff Report"). Page 2 of the Staff Report states that the City's consultant, the "Communications Support Group has recalculated MultiVision's FCC Form 393s based on corrected information." [Emphasis added.] The information supplied to the City by MultiVision in its FCC 393 was in fact correct, and was certified to be true and correct to MultiVision's best knowledge and belief, and made in good faith, under penalty of fine, forfeiture and imprisonment for willful false statements. (See MultiVision's FCC 393, page 2.) Moreover, the information supplied by MultiVision to the City in its Letter was not corrected information, as the information supplied in its FCC 393 was already correct, and was in fact information that was previously supplied the City in its FCC 393 and in the D&T Report. Lastly, the Communications Support Group incorrectly recalculated MultiVision's FCC 393 basic service rates by including non-regulated channels in the benchmark calculation as further discussed below. 74173.2 - 033194 3 final Resolution 94-5666 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, California, pursuant to Sections 76.936, 76.940, 76.941 and 76.942 of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission Disapproving the Existing Rates and Charges for the Basic Service Tier, in part, Prescribing Rates and Charges for Basic Service Tier, and Seeking Comment Why Refunds Should Not Be Ordered (the "Resolution"). The Resolution constitutes the City's written decision disapproving in part, an initial rate within the meaning of 47 CFR §76.936 (the "Decision"). In short, the City's Decision consists of: (1) disapproving MultiVision's unregulated Super Cable Package and a -la -carte channel offerings; (2) ordering MultiVision to reduce the monthly rate for its Basic Service Tier from $19.60 to $18.07 based on the City's conclusion that the Super Cable Package and a -la -carte channel offerings should be included in the count of regulated service channels, and thus reflected in the calculation of the benchmark rate for this tier, thereby lowering the rate; and (3) ordering MultiVision to appear before the Council at 7:30 p.m. on April 12, 1994 to give evidence and show cause why corresponding refunds should not be ordered. MultiVision objects to the Decision of the Council as it is inconsistent with the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992), including 47 U.S.C. §543 et seq. as amended (the "Act"), and 47 CFR §§76.922 and 76.923, and hereby respectfully requests 74173.2 - 033194 4 the City (i) to reconsider and reverse its Decision to the extent it disapproves and re -prescribes the rate for the basic cable service, and (ii) to not order refunds pursuant to the Resolution. II. GENERAL RESPONSE AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DECISION The City's Decision disapproving in part MultiVision's Basic Service Tier rate was based on recalculation of the benchmark rate for the Basic Service Tier to include MultiVision's non-regulated a -la -carte channels within the total count of regulated channels, in contravention of the Act and 47 CFR §§76.922 and 76.923. MultiVision hereby responds by clarifying the non-regulated status of its Super Cable Package and a -la -carte program offerings. In so responding, MultiVision hereby incorporates by reference the Letter described above as previously filed with the City, and MultiVision's November 10, 1993 response to the City's FCC 329 Cable Programming Service Rate Complaint as filed with the FCC, attached hereto as Exhibit A. A. Background. As a preliminary matter, MultiVision wishes to point out that its Super Cable Package and a -la -carte offerings were created in connection with the restructuring of rates and services effective September 1, 1993; the restructuring was intended to bring the system into compliance with Federal 74173.2 - 033194 5 Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") rate regulations and related requirements. In preparation for the restructuring, MultiVision officials carefully analyzed all of the Commission's decisions, orders and other materials relating to the new rate rules. Additionally, they attended cable industry and legal seminars, consulted with communications counsel and independent accountants and participated in discussions with members of the Commission's staff. Accordingly, MultiVision believes that it has made a diligent, good faith effort to understand and apply the new rules.2 As will be demonstrated in this response, MultiVision has not attempted to evade scrutiny but rather has provided full disclosure to regulatory authorities, including the City, and to its customers and has implemented its restructuring in a manner which is fully consistent with the Commission's rules and announced policies.3 MultiVision likewise believes that its restructuring promotes consumer choice, eliminates cross - subsidization and enhances the ability of subscribers to receive only those services which they wish to pay for. In short, MultiVision submits that its restructuring comports with both the letter and the spirit of the Commission's rate regulations. 2 Rate Regulation Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (MM Docket 92-266), adopted April 1, 1993, released May 3, 1993, FCC 93-177, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 72 RR 2d 733, (hereinafter "Rate Order"); 47 CFR §-§ 76.900 et seq. 3 The Commission has characterized an evasion as, inter alia, "an act attempting to elude scrutiny." Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5919, ¶451. 74173.2 - 033194 6 r B. Pay -Per -Channel Programming Is Specifically Excluded from Rate Regulation. As the City is no doubt aware, 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 CFR Section 76.922(a) thereunder clearly provide that only basic cable service and "cable programming service" rates are subject to rate regulation. The programming rates at issue in the Decision, specifically, the per channel charges and discounted package4 rate for WTBS, TNT, E-TV5, WGN, and The Discovery Channel are not subject to rate regulation as these channels are neither part of the basic cable service, nor are the channels cable programming services as defined. Rather, this programming is offered on a pay -per -channel basis and therefore is not subject to rate regulation, in accordance with 47 U.S.C. §543(a) and 47 CFR §76.901(b) (2) thereunder which provide in effect that "video programming offered on a pay -per -channel or pay -per - program basis" is specifically excluded from rate regulation. As the Commission has recognized: Congress excluded per -channel or per -program service offerings [from rate regulation] on the basis of a determination that greater unbundling of offerings leads to more 4 This package is known as the Super Cable Package. 5 E -TV is a new channel offering that was not available to Hermosa Beach subscribers prior to September 1, 1993. E -TV was newly added to MultiVision's programming line-up in Hermosa Beach on September 1, 1993. 74173.2 - 033194 7 subscriber choice and greater competition among program services.6 In reliance upon this clear expression of Congressional policy and intent and upon the Commission's conclusion that: We also do not believe that anything in the Act requires us to restrict the movement of a channel to premium and deregulated status,' MultiVision proceeded with its restructuring plans. In creating its a -la -carte offering, MultiVision also took into account the Commission's guidance that a -la -carte services may be packaged on a collective basis so long as two criteria are met: (1) the price of the combined package must not exceed the sum of the individual charges for each component service;8 and (2) the cable operator must continue to provide the component parts of the package to subscribers separately in addition to the collective offering.9 As will be demonstrated in the following discussion, MultiVision's a -la -carte offerings are in full compliance with these two fundamental requirements. 1. The following channels are currently offered on an a -la -carte basis as part of the MultiVision Super Cable Package 6 Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5836, 1327 citing House Report at 90; Senate Report at 77. ' Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5-907, ¶441, n. 1105. 8 Id. 9 Id. at ¶328. 74173.2 - 033194 8 in Hermosa Beach: WTBS, WGN, E -TV, TNT, and The Discovery Channel. The monthly a -la -carte rate for each of these channels is $1.50 for WTBS; $1.50 for WGN; $1.00 for E -TV; $2.50 for TNT; and $2.25 for The Discovery Channel. WTBS, WGN, TNT and The Discovery Channel were first offered a -la -carte on September 1, 1993. WTBS and WGN were previously included in the Basic Service Tier. TNT and The Discovery Channel were previously included in the satellite (cable programming services or CPS) tier. Thus only two channels were relocated from each of the basic and satellite tiers to be a -la -carte offerings, leaving many times more channels remaining in each of those tiers which were combined to be the new Basic Cable Service. E -TV was added to the Hermosa Beach cable system on September 1, 1993 as an all-new service on an a -la -carte basis and was not previously available. 2. Customers may purchase any combination of WTBS, WGN, E -TV, TNT and The Discovery Channel for the sum of the individual a -la -carte prices. They may purchase all five collectively, called the MultiVision Super Cable Package for $3.85 a month. This package was first made available on September 1, 1993. 3. From September 1, 1993 to at least October 1, 1993, there was no charge for customers to add or to drop the MultiVision Super Cable Package, or to add or to drop individual channels which comprise the package. Since sometime after 74173.2 - 033194 9 October 1, 1993 there is a fee of $18.25 for the field service trip to change services. This includes adding or dropping individual channels which comprise the package. The one field change of service fee includes all changes made during the same service trip. There are no other one time or recurring additional fees to receive these channels. 4. As of February 28, 1994, in the franchise area for the City of Hermosa Beach there were 7365 individual subscribers to the Basic Service Tier, 7208 subscribers to the MultiVision Super Cable Package, and 8 subscribers10 to individual services on an a -la -carte basis from those also offered collectively as the Super Cable Package. Particularly noteworthy are the facts that 157 subscribers have opted to discontinue the Super Cable Package since the September 1st restructuring, and every channel which is offered a -la -carte is actually being purchased on an individually selected a -la -carte basis. The MultiVision Super Cable Package meets the Commission's requirements specified in the Rate Order for a permissible unregulated package of a -la -carte channels. In establishing its prices for the individual a -la -carte services, MultiVision took into account the perceived value of the programming to the subscriber and the cost of the programming to 10 These 8 subscribers break out as follows: 1 subscriber to WTBS, 2 subscribers to E -TV, 1 subscriber to WTBS and E -TV, and 4 subscribers to The Discovery Channel. 74173.2 - 033194 10 the operator. As demonstrated above, the package price is less than the sum of the a -la -carte prices, customers may purchase any component parts of the packaged a -la -carte channels separately or in any combination, and the prices for the a -la -carte services, both individually and in the aggregate, are realistic and rational. Until June 1, 1993 subscribers to the Basic Service Tier received 16 channels, and subscribers to cable programming services (CPS) received 20 additional channels. On June 1, 1993, MultiVision added two new channels to the Basic Service Tier, must -carry stations KWHY-TV and KVEA-TV, resulting in a total of 18 channels on the Basic Service Tier (but no rate increase). Thus, on August 1, 1993 subscribers to the Basic Service Tier received 18 channels, and subscribers to CPS received 20 additional channels. On September 1, 1993, combining the Basic Service Tier and CPS, and adding two more new channels, must - carry stations KLCS-TV and KHSC-TV to basic cable service, while creating the new a -la -carte channel offering, subscribers received 36 channels on basic cable service, plus 5 channels in the new a -la -carte collective package. Having a net incremental decrease of only 2 channels in the total number of basic channels received (and no decrease as compared to the number of channels received in the Basic Service Tier until June 1), and shifting 2 of the 18 former Basic channels (WGN and WTBS), and 2 of the former 20 CPS channels (TNT 74173.2 - 033194 11 and The Discovery Channel) to optional, a -la -carte status while adding 2 new channels to basic cable service, does not in MultiVision's judgment constitute a fundamental change in the quantity or quality of programming received on the Basic and CPS tiers, whether considered separately or as combined. Moreover, offering the services in this manner enables basic tier subscribers to avail themselves of popular and desirable programming without having to subscribe to the entire package of cable programming services; this option represents a substantial savings for those who choose to exercise it, and some subscribers are already so choosing. The Commission has not found that a shift of programming from a tier to a -la -carte status would in and of itself constitute an evasion and has indicated that it would instead review such practices on a case-by-case basis." Additionally, MultiVision's a -la -carte programming and Super Cable Package should not be subject to regulation even under the factors newly announced by the FCC on February 22, 1994,12 for which the actual rules were only issued yesterday, 11 Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5916, ¶453, n. 1161. Trade press reports confirm that senior members of the FCC staff have endorsed the view that a -la -carte offerings are not a per se evasion: "Moving services from the program tier to a la carte is not an evasion of the Act. The Act actually provides that incentive." Multichannel News, August 23, 1993 at 67. 12 See FCC Executive Summary,- February 22, 1994, Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (MM Docket No. 93-266) p. 4, FCC Rcd 74173.2 - 033194 12 March 30, 1994. The rate regulation orders, documents and rules issued March 30, 1994 by the FCC consist of over 500 pages which MultiVision and its counsel have not had the opportunity to fully review for purposes of this Response, which is being filed immediately as a precaution against any applicable time limits under the City's municipal code. We believe the newly issued FCC rules and standards in any event are prospective in their application, and not retroactive as to programming offerings established September 1, 1993 in conformity with and reliance upon the Commission's rules and pronouncements in effect at that time (see, e.g. RKO General, Inc. v. FCC, 670 F.2d 215 (D.C. Cir. 1981)), pursuant to the Commission's rate regulation procedures. Notably, the City's rate review and Decision relate specifically to the rates in effect as of September 1, 1993. In any event, MultiVision reserves the right to supplement this Response promptly if needed to reflect any applicable revised rules issued by the Commission yesterday, March 30. MultiVision therefore submits that the facts of this particular case clearly demonstrate that the packaging and pricing of its a-la-carte channels meet the Commission's enunciated standards in effect when the current offerings were implemented on September 1, 1993 and at this time, are bona fide offerings and promote realistic consumer choice on a cost effective basis. Accordingly, MultiVision submits that its Super Cable Package is in full compliance with the Commission's applicable Rules and policies. Further as MultiVision's a -la - 74173.2 - 033194 13 carte program offerings and its Super Cable Package are specifically excluded from regulation in accordance with 47 U.S.C. §543(a) and 47 CFR §76.901(b)(2), MultiVision respectfully requests that the City reconsider and reverse its Decision treating MultiVision's Super Cable Package and a -la -carte program offerings as regulated services, and thus prescribing rates and/or ordering rate refunds based on the inclusion of these non- regulated program offerings in the City's benchmark calculations applicable to the Basic Service Tier. III. RESPONSE TO CITY STAFF REPORT Section 1 of the Resolution states that: The existing rates and charges for the Basic Service Tier and associate equipment as identified in FCC Form 393 dated November 30, 1993 are hereby disapproved in part for the reasons, and on the grounds, as contained in the Consultant's Report dated January 18, 1994 ("Consultant's Report") and the staff report dated March 10, 1994 ("Staff Report"), all of which are incorporated into this Resolution by reference as if fully stated herein. The Consultant's Report and the Staff Report provide the stated basis for the City's Decision, and MultiVision hereby responds to these reports. As the City did not attach a copy of the Consultant's Report to the Resol-ution and to our knowledge did not distribute the Consultant's Report to the public, MultiVision is presently unable to respond to the Consultant's 74173.2 - 033194 14 Report although MultiVision has formally requested of the City on March 30 to be provided a copy of the Consultant's Report under the California Public Records Act. As a result, MultiVision's response is limited to the decision factors listed in the Staff Report, which apparently is based upon the Consultant's Report. A. Decision Factors. The Staff Report lists five "Decision Factors" as the basis for its recommendation that the Super Cable Package be treated as a regulated service.13 MultiVision hereby responds to each Decision Factor in the order they appear in the Staff Report. 1. Decision Factors 1 and 2-- "The Pricing Structure of the Super Cable Package make the Purchase of an A -La -Carte Channel an Unrealistic Choice." MultiVision disputes the aforementioned statement which is not based on any factual information. The only basis for this statement is the Staff's assumption, without any evidence, that "few, if any," subscribers have chosen to subscribe to the Super Cable Package on an a -la -carte basis. Further, MultiVision would like to point out that the Staff's statement that "MultiVision failed to provide the City with any figures related to the number of customers subscribing to the SuperCable package or any individual channel" is misleading. MultiVision was never even 13 74173.2 - 033194 See Staff Report, p. 4. 15 requested to provide this information to City.14 Had the City previously requested this information, MultiVision would have gladly provided it, and indeed has voluntarily provided this information in Section II.B. above. More importantly, the Staff Report in making this statement fails to recognize that not all subscribers are interested in receiving all five channels, i.e., 157 subscribers have already made the decision to receive none of these channels, and there are also subscribers for whom the per -channel option will be a realistic service choice as these subscribers are only interested in receiving a certain channel or channels in the package. Indeed, as noted above, 8 subscribers are already receiving individually selected a -la -carte services just within the City of Hermosa Beach, and every a -la -carte channel offered in Hermosa Beach has been individually chosen by at least one subscriber on an a -la -carte basis. The City's Decision not only neglects the interests of certain subscribers, but also is inconsistent with the facts of actual subscribership as provided above, which show that the a- la -carte offerings do provide subscribers with a realistic 14 MultiVision was only asked to provide subscriber numbers for its regulated tiers, and as the Super Cable Package and a -la -carte offerings are not regulated, subscriber numbers were therefore not provided for these service offerings. See February 28, 1994 letter from the City's Mary C. Rooney to MultiVision's Donald R. Granger, question 2. See also Letter, p. 2. 74173.2 - 033194 16 service choice. The package is a "realistic service choice" for subscribers interested in all five channels, and the a -la -carte options represent "realistic service choice" for subscribers who are only interested in a certain channel or channels included in the package. Further, MultiVision would like to clarify that in establishing its a -la -carte prices, it took into account the perceived value of the programming to the subscriber and the cost of the programming to the operator. As demonstrated above, the package price is less than the sum of the per -channel prices, customers may purchase any component parts of the packaged channels separately or in any combination, and the prices for the a -la -carte services, both individually and in the aggregate, are realistic and rational. Noteworthy are the facts that as of February 28, 1994, 8 subscribers have opted to subscribe to one or more individual services on an a -la -carte basis, and that 157 subscribers have opted to discontinue the collective package in its entirety since the September 1st restructuring. MultiVision submits that the facts of this case clearly demonstrate that the packaging and pricing of its a -la -carte channels and collective package meet the FCC's enunciated standards at this time, are bona fide offerings and promote consumer choice on a cost effective basis. Accordingly, Multivision submits that its a -la - carte offerings provide a "realistic service choice" to 74173.2 - 033194 17 subscribers and are in full compliance with the FCC's current rules and policies. 2. Decision Factor 3 -- "800 of the channels offered on the SuperCable package were removed from regulated tiers of service." However, almost 90% of the channels on the former basic and satellite tiers remained in the combined, regulated basic service tier from September 1, 1993 forward. As discussed in Section II.B. above, until June 1, 1993 subscribers to the Basic Service Tier received 16 channels, and subscribers to cable programming services (CPS) received 20 additional channels. On June 1, 1993, MultiVision added two new channels to the Basic Service Tier, must -carry stations KWHY-TV and KVEA-TV, resulting in a total of 18 channels on the Basic Service Tier (but no rate increase). Thus, on August 1, 1993 subscribers to the Basic Service Tier received 18 channels, and subscribers to CPS received 20 additional channels. On September 1, 1993, combining the Basic Service Tier and CPS, creating the a -la -carte collective offering, and adding two more new channels, must -carry stations KLCS-TV and KHSC-TV to basic cable service while creating the new a -la -carte channel offering, subscribers received 36 channels on basic cable service, plus 5 channels in the new a -la -carte collective package. Having a net incremental decrease of only 2 channels in the total number of basic channels received (and no decrease as compared to the number of channels received in the Basic Service 74173.2 - 033194 18 Tier until June 1), and shifting 2 of the 18 former Basic channels (WGN and WTBS), and 2 of the 20 CPS channels (TNT and The Discovery Channel) to optional, a -la -carte status while adding 2 new channels to basic cable service, does not in MultiVision's judgment constitute a fundamental change in the quantity or quality of programming received on the Basic and CPS tiers, whether considered separately or as combined. Moreover, offering the services in this manner enables basic tier subscribers to avail themselves of popular and desirable programming without having to subscribe to the entire package of cable programming services; this option represents a substantial savings for those who choose to exercise it, and some subscribers are already so choosing. The Commission has not found that a shift of programming from a tier to a -la -carte status would in and of itself constitute an evasion and has indicated that it would instead review such practices on a case-by-case basis.15 3. Decision Factor 4 -- "Subscribers must pay a $18.25 field change of service fee for adding or deleting individual channels." MultiVision would like to clarify that although this statement is partially correct, it is also seriously misleading. is Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5916, ¶453, n. 1161. Trade press reports confirm that senior members of the Chairman's staff had contemporaneously endorsed the view that a -la -carte offerings are not a per se evasion: "Moving services from the program tier to a la carte is not an evasion of the Act. The Act actually provides that incentive." Multichannel News, August 23, 1993 at 67. 74173.2 - 033194 19 First of all, the Staff Report fails to mention, as discussed in Section II.B. above, that from September 1, 1993 to at least October 1, 1993, there was no charge for customers to add or to drop the MultiVision Super Cable Package, or to add or to drop any individual channels which comprise the package. All subscribers were notified of the new service offerings effective September 1, 1993, and were informed of their right to choose individual a -la -carte channels or discontinue the collective package, without charge during the transitional period. Consistent with the Commission's transitional guidelines, only sometime after October 1, 1993 was there an applicable fee of $18.25 for the field service trip to change services. Secondly, the field change of service fee is a cost - based, regulated charge set by the Hourly Service Charge (HSC) method prescribed by Commission regulations, 47 C.F.R. §923. This fee was included in MultiVision's Form 393 rate submission to the City, and in fact the City has already approved it pursuant to its Resolution 94-5666 (see Exhibit A to such Resolution). This single fee includes adding or dropping any combination of individual channels which comprise the package. The one field change of service fee includes all changes made during the same service trip. There are no other one time or recurring additional fees to receive these channels. There is no basis for the City to use this rate -regulated, City -approved HSC charge for field change of service as a justification for finding 74173.2 - 033194 20 that MultiVision's a -la -carte offerings do not provide realistic subscriber choice, or are otherwise disqualified from constituting unregulated pay -per -channel services. 4. Decision Factor 5 -- "Inclusion of the channels offered on the SuperCable package in the rate calculations significantly lowers the Maximum Permitted Rate for Basic Cable Service." MultiVision does not dispute that adding the non- regulated a -la -carte channels to the count of regulated services would arithmetically lower the Maximum Permitted Rate for Basic Cable Service. However, it should be noted that the City may not recalculate MultiVision's Basic Service Tier rate based on the inclusion in regulated services of non-regulated a -la -carte channels, merely in order to artificially depress basic cable service rates for political or other reasons without foundation in the applicable statutes and regulations. B. City's Decision Not Based on Actual Local Circumstances. The Staff Report, on which the City's Decision is based, states that the City's consultant "CSG does not suggest similar treatment [to the Super Cable Package] be given the People's Choice offerings. This is because two of the People's Choice offerings were previously offered by MultiVision as 74173.2 - 033194 21 Premium services while the remaining three offerings are new additions to the MultiVision line-up."16 MultiVision's Hermosa Beach cable system does not now offer, nor has it ever offered a "People's Choice" package and/or program offerings. The above paragraph in the Staff Report is apparently the result of the Staff Report being uncritically based on the Consultant's Report, which itself apparently was casually generated from "canned" generic documents prepared for other communities served by other cable systems. Thus the reliability and factual accuracy of the decisions and statements contained in the Staff Report and the City's resulting Decision are not based on careful or reasonable consideration of actual local community circumstances. Instead the City's statements and Decision disapproving the basic cable service rate are result - oriented foregone conclusions, reached without regard to the local circumstances and facts of MultiVision's individual case. The Staff Report to that extent does not provide a reliable and/or factual basis for the City's Decision. C. Determination of Regulated vs. Non -Regulated Status of Super Cable Service. The Staff Report questions: (1) whether the Super Cable Package a -la -carte offerings provide "consumers with a realistic service choice" which in the Staff's opinion would 16 74173.2 - 033194 See Staff Report, p. 4. 22 qualify the Super Cable Package and its a -la -carte offerings for non-regulated treatment; (2) whether the Super Cable Package and its a -la -carte offerings were created to escape regulation; and (3) whether the FCC's February 22, 1994 announcement of changes to its rate regulations permit regulation of the Super Cable Package and its a -la -carte offerings.17 As demonstrated by MultiVision in Section II.B. and elsewhere above, MultiVision submits that the facts of this case clearly demonstrate that the packaging and pricing of its a -la -carte channels meet the Commission's enunciated standards in effect when such offerings were composed (the same September 1, 1993 date to which the City's rate review relates), are bona fide offerings and promote consumer choice on a cost effective basis. MultiVision respectfully requests that the City reconsider its Decision to act in contravention of the Act and FCC Rules and regulations by including MultiVision's non-regulated program offerings in the benchmark calculation to determine a "reasonable rate" for MultiVision's Basic Service Tier, and to prescribe and/or refund rates based on the inclusion of non-regulated program offerings in its benchmark calculations. D. FCC Inquiry. The Staff Report also states that the FCC "...sent letters of inquiry to 35 cable systems for possible violations of the rate regulation rules," is "questioning...the practice of 17 74173.2 - 033194 See Staff Report, p. 5. 23 removing channels from the basic tier and charging for them on a per channel (a -la -carte) basis," and that it "may be many months before ...[the FCC announces its decisions] in these cases, long after the City will be required to make its rate determination. „is These statements are irrelevant to the City's Decision and provide no foundation for it whatsoever. MultiVision has complied with the FCC's rules and regulations. The FCC's inquiries were not directed to MultiVision's Hermosa Beach cable system. Additionally, as discussed above in Section II.B. it is MultiVision's belief that any action on the part of. the FCC to alter the effective a -la -carte rules is prospective in its application, and not retroactive as to programming offerings established September 1, 1993 in conformity with and reliance upon the Commission's rules and pronouncements in effect at that time (see, e.g. RKO General, Inc. v. FCC, 670 F.2d 215 (D.C. Cir. 1981)). Notably, pursuant to the Commission's rate review procedures, the City's rate review and Decision relate specifically to the rates in effect as of September 1, 1993. E. City Jurisdiction. The Staff Report clearly recognizes that the City may only regulate MultiVision's Basic Service Tier.19 However, the Staff Report errs in its recommendation to treat as regulated 18 19 74173.2 - 033194 See Staff Report, p. 6. See Staff Report, p. 5. 24 MultiVision's Super Cable Package and a -la -carte offerings by including these channels in the channel count for regulated services, which determines the rate for the Basic Service Tier. As discussed in Section II.B. above, MultiVision's Super Cable Package and a -la -carte offerings are not subject to regulation. Thus the City may not prescribe a rate and/or refund rates based on a recalculation of the benchmark that includes such non- regulated channels. Further, as this recalculation was the reason for the City's disapproval of MultiVision's rates for its Basic Service Tier, MultiVision respectfully requests the City to reconsider its Decision and to approve MultiVision's existing basic cable service rate. F. Financial Analysis. The Staff Report also states that including MultiVision's Super Cable Package and a -la -carte offerings in the count of regulated channels will result in monthly savings of $1.53 per subscriber based on the recalculation of the benchmark.20 However, this statement alone, assuming arguendo that it is arithmetically correct, does not justify the City's Decision. As discussed above, the City lacks jurisdiction to regulate MultiVision's Super Cable Package and a -la -carte offerings. The City may not prescribe new rates nor order refunds based on a recalculation of the benchmark that includes non-regulated channels. 20 74173.2 - 033194 See Staff Report, p. 7. 25 IV. CONCLUSION As the Super Cable Package and a -la -carte program offerings are not subject to regulation by the City, the City erred in its Decision: (1) to regulate the Super Cable Package and a -la -carte program offerings by including these non-regulated channels in the total count of regulated channels which determines the regulated rate for the Basic Service Tier; and (2) to prescribe and/or order refund of rates for the Basic Service Tier based on the inclusion of non-regulated a -la -carte channels in the count of regulated channels. As these were the only bases provided by the City for its Decision to disapprove MultiVision's Basic Service Tier, MultiVision respectfully requests the Council to: (1) reconsider and reverse its Decision disapproving and re - prescribing the rate for Basic Cable Service; (2) approve 74173.2 - 033194 26 MultiVision's existing rate for Basic Cable Service; and (3) therefore not order rate refunds. The City's Decision has already approved all rates for basic cable services and equipment, except the rate for Basic Cable Service, and as to such approval only, MultiVision agrees with and accepts that portion of the City's Decision. DATED: March 31, 1994 ML MEDIA PARTNERS, L.P., trading as MultiVision Cable TV 74173.2 - 033194 By: juk Walter W. Hansell Karen L. Holm Its Attorneys Cooper, White & Cooper 201 California St., 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 433-1900 27 Federal Communications Commission Washington D. C. 20554 FCC 393 REQUEST FOR CABLE RATE APPROVAL COVER SHEET **Rest of 393 omitted -See attacl Cttnitiknit ldestirration Code Date November 10, 1993 (I) Name of Cable Operator MultiVision Cable TV Corp. Mailing Address 1529 Valley Drive (2) 'City Hermosa Beach State CA ZIP Code 90254 Point of contact for this form: Donald R. Granger-MultiVision/Walter W. Hansell, Esq. $ Tele hone ( 7�4 )632-9222/(415) 433-1900 Fax Number (714 )630-4241/(415) 433-5530 Maximum permitted rate for basic service tier (exclusive of any franchise fee): (multiply (1) by (3) above) Local Franchising Authority City of Hermosa Beach Mailing Address 1315 Valley Drive City Hermosa Beach State CA ZIP Code • 90254 . Is this form being fled with respect to: *See Attached ri basic rate regulation or n x p� cable programming service rate regulation ng If this form is being riled in response to a complaint about your cable programming service rates, please attach a copy of the complaint to this cover sheet. The following sections are to be completed after you have filled out the worksheets in PARTS 11 and 111 and calculated your actual and permitted rates. FOR .BASIC SERVICE TIER AND EQUIPMENT Program Service Rate (I) Number of channels on basic service tier: N/A (2) Current rate for basic service tier: (do not include any franchise fees) $ .N/A (3) Maximum permitted per channel rate: (from Linc 600, Part 11) $ N/A (4) Maximum permitted rate for basic service tier (exclusive of any franchise fee): (multiply (1) by (3) above) $ N/A NOTE: If your current rate for the basic service tier (entry 2) exceeds the maximum permitted rate for that tier (entry 4), you must submit a cost -of -service showing or your basic service rate will be reduced to the maximum permitted level shown In entry 4. Franchise fees have been excluded from this analysis in order to compare your monthly rate for the basic service tier to the maximum permitted level. Whether you Itemize them or not, any franchise fees you pay for the basic service tier should be added to your monthly rate as part of the service when billing your subscribers. See 47 C.F.R. Section 76.985. ATTACHMENT TO FCC 393 REQUEST FOR CABLE RATE APPROVAL COVER SHEET: RESPONSE OF ML MEDIA PARTNERS, L.P. DBA MULTIVISION CABLE . TV CORP. (CA ID #0310) TO FCC 329 CABLE PROGRAMMING SERVICE RATE COMPLAINT BY THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION ML Media Partners, L.P. dba MultiVision Cable TV Corp. ("MultiVision") received the attached FCC 329 Cable Programming Service Rate Complaint ("complaint") from the City of Hermosa Beach, California on or about September 15, 1993. Service occurred on the date of mailing by the complainant, which it certifies in item 12 of the FCC 329 as September 13, 1993. II. REQUEST FOR WAIVER TO REQUIREMENT OF RESPONSE IN THE FORM OF A COMPLETED FCC 393 MultiVision hereby respectfully requests a waiver from the requirements of 47 CFR Section 76.956(a), specifically that MultiVision's response to the attached complaint be in the form of a completed Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") 393. The basis for MultiVision's request is two -fold: (1) the complaint does not relate to rates presently subject to regulation by the FCC (see below); and (2) the attached complaint is defective. Subject to the FCC's approval of MultiVision's waiver request, MultiVision hereby responds in accordance with 47 CFR Section 76.956 to the attached complaint. 1 III. RESPONSE A. Pay -Per -Channel Programming Is Specifically Excluded from Rate Regulation. 47 U.S.C. §543 and 47 CFR Section 76.922(a) thereunder clearly provide that only basic cable service and "cable programming service" rates are subject to rate regulation. The programming rates at issue in the attached complaint, specifically, the per channel charges and discounted package rate for WTBS, WGN, E -TV, TNT, and Discovery are not subject to rate regulation as these channels are neither part of the basic cable service, nor are the channels cable programming services as defined. Rather, this programming is offered on a pay -per - channel basis and therefore is not subject to rate regulation, in accordance with 47 U.S.C. Section 543(a) and 47 CFR Section 76.901(b)(2) thereunder which provides in effect that "video programming offered on a pay -per -channel or pay -per -program basis" is specifically excluded from rate regulation. The FCC has stated that it "will not regulate collective offerings of otherwise exempt per -channel or per - program services so long as two essential conditions are met." See Rate Regulation Report and Order (MM Docket 92-266), May 3, 1993, Paragraph 327 (72 RR 2d 819). These conditions are: 1 The monthly per -channel rates for these channels are as follows: WTBS - $1.50; WGN - $1.50; E -TV - $1.00; TNT - $2.50; Discovery $2.25. All five channels may also be purchased at the discounted monthly package rate of $3.85, a savings of $4.90 over the per -channel rate for all five channels. A copy of the current' rate card for the City of Hermosa Beach, California indicating these charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2 (1) the package price does not exceed. the sum of the per -channel charges; and (2) the channels making up the package remain available on an per -channel basis. Ibid. Both conditions are met with regard to the programming here at issue: (1) the package price of $3.85 is less than the total per -channel price of $8.75, and (2) these channels are readily available as a discounted package, or on an per -channel basis, to all subscribers.2 As the programming rates that are the subject of the attached complaint do not involve basic cable service, and are not for "cable programming services," but are in fact rates for pay -per -channel programming that is specifically excluded from regulation, MultiVision respectfully requests that the attached complaint be dismissed with prejudice. B. The Complaint is Defective. Complainant has failed to attach a copy of its subscriber bill to the complaint as served on MultiVision, as required by section 10 of the complaint form and by 47 CFR Section 76.951(c). Complainant completed Item 10 of the FCC 329 to indicate. that "yes", the bill is attached. Section 103 of the complaint form explicitly authorizes the dismissal of the complaint due to complainant's failure to comply with this section. Complainant's 2 See rate card attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3 Section 10 of FCC 329 specifically states that "failure to attach a copy of [a]...current bill reflecting the rate or rate increase may result in dismissal of [the]...complaint." Complainant has failed to attach a copy of its current bill to the complaint. 3 failure to complete the complaint as required by attaching a copy of its subscriber bill renders the complaint defective. MultiVision therefore respectfully requests that the complaint be dismissed as it is defective. Moreover, dismissal of the complaint is clearly authorized due to the complainant's failure to comply with section 10 of the complaint form. IV. CONCLUSION The complaint is incomplete and defective. Additionally, the FCC lacks jurisdiction over the rates that are the subject of the attached complaint. Therefore, MultiVision respectfully requests that the attached complaint be dismissed with prejudice. DATED: November 10 , 1993 55926.1 ML MEDIA PARTNERS, L.P. 4 By J7 Its Authorized A: ent/Regional Vice President EXHIBIT A (CURRENT MONTHLY RATE LIST - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) Per -Channel Rate: WTBS - $1.50 WGN - $1.50 ETV - $1.00 TNT $2.50 Discovery - $2.25 Package Rate for all Five channels - $3.85 5 Dateeta 13 193 I 1 ,J,b.rt..i; O. C. 20354 } FCC 329 CABLE PROCRJ,MMINC SERVICE RATE COMPLAIN f FORM (Carefully read Instructions on reverse before filling out form) • Complainant's Name City of Hermosa Beach Mailing Address 1315 Valley Drive City Hermosa Beach ate ZIP Code 'State 90254 Daytime Telephone No. (include area code). (310) 318-028C 2. local Franchising Authority' Name tits of Hermosa Beach Mailing Address 1315 Valley Drive city Hermosa Beach 3. Cable Company's Name Mailing Address City State 1 ZIP Code CA 90254 MultiVision 1529 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach State I ZIP Code CA 90254 Cable Company's FCC Community Unit Identifier (if known): ('A01)0 tndicste whether this is the first time you hare tiled this complain •t the FCC or whether you are filing a corrected complaint to cure a .–sect in a prior complaint. CHECK ONE. inmlb First time complaint Corrected complaint S. 1f you are filing a corrected complaint to cure a defect In a prior complaint, indicate the date the prior complaint was filed with the FCC and the date you received notification from the FCC that the prior complaint was defective. Date prior complaint filed: Date you received FCC notification that the prior complaint was detective: Month Date N/A Month I Date N/A IYear [Year Indicate whether you are challenging the reasonableness of: (1) s rate concerning cable programming service or associated equipment in effect on September 1, 1993; or (2) a rate Increase. (See the Instructions for different filing deadlines depending on which type of complaint you are filing.) CHECK ONE. Rate in effect on September 1, 1993 Rate increase 7. 11you are a ber a rate increase, indicate the rd rte first err thei ddaaobill fromeness the cable operator reflecting the rate increase about which you are complaining. IMonth 'Date eta N/A If S. Indicate the Current monthly rate or the cable programming service uuociated equipment and. If you are challengingthe r�sonableness rate increase, the most recent rate in effect mediately prior to rate increase. Current Monthly Rate: „a 3.85 Previous Monthly Rate; $ �ontn Year 9 93 Mit h Year 1 4 •1 uua 10400;4, t»:o cansns For FCC Use Only t. In the tables below, describe the cable programming service to which the complaint is addressed and, if applicable, how It has changed II this space is Insufficient. include any additional Comments on a separate page attached to this form. Lin channels by name included in the service: .WTBS E–TV TNT Discovery List channels by name deleted from the servke (if any); —r --- List channels by name added to the service 01 any): 10. 11 you are a subscriber, you must attach a copy of your current bill reflecting the rate or rate increase about which you are complaining. NOTE: Failure to attach a copy of your current bill reflecting the rate or rate Increase may result In dismissal of your complaint. • I have attached a copy of my current bill. .ED Yrs DNo 11, Optional: If you are a subscriber challenging the reasonableness of a rate increase, attach a copy of a previous bit Qf available) reflecting the rate immediately prior to the rate Increase. I have attached a copy of my previous bill. ❑ yes 0No 12. 1 certify that 1 am sending a copy of this complaint, including all attachments, to the cable company and the local franchising authority at the addresses listed above via first class mail, postage prepaid, at the same time 1 am sending a copy of this complain( to the FCC. NOTE: Failure to satisfy this requirement may result In dismissal of your complaint. The cable company will not be required to respond unless you send a copy of the complaint to the cable company by mail. Yee QNs Date sent: l Month 9 13. 1 believe that the cable company's rate for the cable programming • service or associated equipment described above is unreasonable because it violates the FCC's rate regulations, (CHECK 504 14.1 certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information supplied on this form is true and correct. r Signature Date Q// WILAU& vas! STATWLNre M.&0( Ow ?ser Foe►, ass,uwis►wsu IT nNn itkAPersoklutivf sus. coot erns is. stCTION toe u 0404 to complainant This complaint form will be „us.u:w.d M d.. err+...,. • .. - r_ ._.. ___ _._ .. MultiVision Cable TV ' 1529 Valley Drive ! Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NI 1310) 318-3423 CHANNEL DIRECTORY I Manhattan Beach ■ Hermosa Beach i 2= KCBS 3 = Local Programming 4 = J0€C 5= KRA 8 • ESFN 7 = KABC 8 • USA Neiwoit 9 = KCAL 10 • CNN 11 = KTTV 12 • MV = KCCP 4 Cinemax 15 = KDOC _6 • The Weather Channel 17 KIM 18 The Ducie Channel 19 • American Movie Classics 20 HBO 21 9howlime 22 = :YGN 23 The Disney Channel 24 • VH -1 Lig." rirvd has c • Satel ite Tier Semite Preferred Basi= tailed Besse arc Sateiits :ler Service ▪ Premium Channel • 25 • Mckebdeon 26 . MC -lone Shopping 27 = KIDS 28 3 KCET 29 • The Discovery Charnel 30 = C -Span 31 • CNN Headine News 32 • The Family Charnel 33 • lifetime 34 = KMEX 35 • CNBC 36 • Prime Ticket 37• TNT 38 • The learning Charnel 1 Bravo 39 • Ms d Esiertairrneq 40 • OVGFashlan Cham 41=KOCE 42 • Free male previews 43 • Horne Vow Theater 11 AI Movies 44 • Home Video Theater fl / Recent Movies/Ad It movies ys,r4,AY y, K veA March 199:1 MuIt�.Vision Cable TV Where the Customer is L I A 1 MultiVision Cable N Manhattan Beach ! Hermosa Beach RATES AND CHARGES MONTHLY RATES = Limited Basic Broadcast Service - S12.95 • Satellite Tier Service.--------_--.._ __..--.-•-•--...._....___..9 30 Preferred Basic Cable Package..__ __..__.._..__._..._____2225 HBO.-__-------_..._._......._....._..... _.».....»........._.•_...._..11.50 Showtime..:__...._ _...»....._......._..____. _.1150 Cinemax. ____.._...... ._......._.__..__.._.____.1t.50 The Movie Channel.11.50 The Disney Channet ......____...__..» ..._._........____......._...9.95 Standard Converter_._..._..__.__._.._.........___....___._._.._.3.00 Remote Control Converter. .650 Remote Control Converter w/ Universal Remote _.7.00 Parental Control Service Call (Cable Related)...._ _..____. .....-_..._._.WC Service Cal (Non -Cable Related}...__..... _......__....__....._25.00 = Ririati Etre inctdes oraed ad sen&s cr ei►- Otter resbdnrs appy. • SatalrelIef 5 e reuses p olase of linked Basc cr rest smite. • Fneta ed Bast Cabe Sen& inddes lintel Banc pts Setelke Tei Senate~ Free mimes- wtha-ypremiumsevimonIntaeeto-* HOME VIDEO THEATER PAY -PER -MEW 1 Request Hit kbctiies (charnel 43 & c�tnel _. St Spice mutt Movies (channel 44) _.---.__...__.... ...__..__....6-35 Special Events vary Home Video Treater Hotline 1-800-300-6068 • 1 INSTALLATION AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES I Standard Aerial Instalatiort-Preterred Cable Service. ..._. 539.95 - Standard Installation -United Basic Broadcast Service _.....59.95 - Underground Installation-Prefened Cable Swfr..e .......... - fleeor nect/'Frartsfer Existing Service ... ..._ . __.. 39.95 Additional Outlet (at time cf initial install--prewired)..._._..___.:_..N,C Additional Outlet (at time c( Initial install-postwire)..__.._.........25.0Q Additional 3rd & 4th Outlet (initial install) _______...,,.,-__.._.._10.00 ..�, Move Existing Ot>tleet (at lnbal install-prewire)._..- 10.00 Move Existing Outlet (alt intial install-posiwire) .,..,,,.....-_....__5.00 Move Existing Outlet (separate trip)....._....__ ..... _....._....__..__25.00 Add Additional Outlet (separate Mp) ......._-..... ...__..__.25.00 Premium Service Change_,.__.._._... ___. ..__ _....._.......10.00 VCR/AH Swech-Install #s dudes labor & materials). -___....._...25.00 VCR:AB Switch -Install tit (customer pick-up).....__..-.........__..- 5.00 Trip Charge (customer education past due co lection) ..__ 1500 Converter Insta0 (Separate trip) LateCharge--.�...____-...,.......__ �__.._....__... _ .10.00 Returner! Check t Targe _...._.__...___. ...___ ._...___20.00 Rates & Services are subject to change with a thirty -day notice Aerial standard Instals are corddered standard N the distances Lass than 150 feet from this pole attachment to the hot Uncterground instal* hchids trenching cp to 75 feet and is restricted to minor larxscaping. Additional chows may be necessary kr instatatias that exceed these requirements. 1 ADamoNAL CUSTOMER INFORMAT1ON namely throe are no derrges kra swabs ed. Howetw, a tunica fee nay be assessed 11 It hi delemrnee that art problem is drab aeaw es negrigence. The above rates do not Include ail bd t en: is s fie et Malty lbertaaes. Theses/ appear co warder war foe elama. The franchise fee is paid to the Iran:hive gander fortrse dptfc rigiteltway Iadade ialstration of the cable bandage. Please nal o- stop by our business office Nyco have any questions regarding biE1g or servioe. 1111 HOURS OF OPERATION 1 r (310) 318.3423 Monday- F daY:.-_..__..._.......___._....._...__ 900 am. to 7:00 p.m. Saturctay...___ ___.»._._.�_-..._.._.._--._ .9U0 am. to 5.'00 p.m. For emergency after-hours service. please cal 010)318-U24. Our answering service will relay messages left atter hours. • H7H HSOWa3H/dIQ3W 1W 4ry r0 3UPER ABLE SERVICE; includa ':1 fir TODD r .:,,.P: �wc�rr• : • Franchise Utuicy Total Price Fee Tax Price • . $19.60 .. $0.98 . • $1.96 . . $22.54 ... 3.85 .•. 0.19 ... 0.39•..'.:4.43 • 0.75 ... Q,& . . . Q,9$ • . . . Q$Z • 2d.20 .. 1.2 • .22_1111, . • 122,81 4.••. 3.35 ••.0.1.9 • -.•• tr:;3-. .r' ::1�N ..• ,': • • . • om•r. ▪ ,: ; t1 1 ,r ;.r: iii' • 'Vd. `•4'.•'r-1•; stoh1.A k Cuts Price'1-.4.*:.; t • d71N1'‘%;',/14t%' r,,,;j�deer Cibk-Service PrIce''' ' 11�' 23ii �.11.7.1••'.",V.. .V.!:'..`>:•1•..:% .. . , ,••• ., '. si ▪ • • ri `"` ' A' 1 Carte Ser.ices .. ;. 6N•,;. •• L %y•. ,1"1:,,,,,.•.;1'.'.e/� i • a • .'I'.i Ili 1 I•'• i�•• . • f �y:{.i7 ( • iS�\ �: a .•i • . • :�. iI T•{c•.�1 -i. .•3•••6..,•68 „,,„'...........7.'••• .i3:.: 4 . . .e.,{.+, :. . ,l • •a"• ... • . •. . I :.1 a I 6 •' a . . ....• ... 2.25 .. • 0.11 30;6.1;•/•:.•..••I.,.I,.'t•••• �'•.i,••....11.50' •..0.58 t1 einemax ' ' ..I. • . • • • •• . •• / '♦ '6 •' 3 • d 11.50 . • • 0.58 •�i3 MC o 1 thowtime• _ , Disney ...• • - • • • • A 1a Cute 31.30 • 1.50 •.1.00 2.S0 •..0.39....4.43 30.08 • . • . 30,15 .... 31.73 0.01 0 15 173 0.05 0 10 ' 115 0.13 0.25 211 U.775 ...:'i $0.45 ... • $0.1_1Q ... S10.08 •.• •.. i'i . • ••:712231 • . • "14,12 ••• . 1 2 • • • . MAI $4..900 (56%) $0.26 01%) $0.49 (56%) ' t3.64 06%) .. • . .. $1.50 .. $0.08 . '.:1.50 . • 0.08 • '• ' 1.00 • • • 0.05 ' 2.50 . ▪ 0.13 i. -Other Services 11•1•4;',./..0.Standard Remote ,.Universal Remote • 6 • •'i 6 • • • • • •''• • / • • • • • • • 0.50 ,•. I. . • 11.50 • : '. 0.58 11.50' .'.. 0.58 • 9.95 . 0.50 .. $0.15...'$1.73 .•.0.15.•.'•1.73 ••• 0.10..•.;1.15 ... 0.25... '4.88 ... 0.23 . • .'.!Z.59 ... 1.15..:' 13.23 • .. 1.15... ' 13.23 ... 1.15... 13.23 1.15 . ' 13.23 ... 0.99... 11.44 • . • . $ 0.35 .. $0.02 . . $0.04 ... $0.41 .. '. 0.03 ... 0.05 .... ;0.58 : � 1remium Additional Outlet (Disney &'Cinemax) •' 1.90 . •. • 0.10 • • . 0.19 . a . 2.19 ''` Additional Otitlef''`' ' , li .'.�. ' ' ' '4.50' 0.23 0.45 ....' 5.18 Premiunn , ..• � a .. " ... .. . .Monthly Maintenance Insurance . ' • . i :.. '•0.75 . •• • 0.04 • • • 0.08 • • ... 0.87 •';.. • ' 1 .Converter .... '1 •6 • • 3 3 2.60 . . . 0.13 . . . 0.26 . . . .' 2.99 • ► ► =h Installation Charges 'r.t.'•'•' Hourly Service Charge (ESC) 6 $36.50 . . $1.83 . . $3.65 . . $41.98 ,,,` • '" Aerial Installation I ' 72.95 ... 3.65 . • • 7.30 ... 83.90 . •' Underground Installation ., 109.45 ... 5.47 . . 10.95 . . 125.87 . • ' ' ''•'Pre -wired Home Installation 136.50 ... 1.83 ... 3.65 ... 41.98 I • • A/O Install at initial installation : • • A/0 Install after Initial installation Upgrade/Downgrade/Disconnect .:.: Electronic Change of Service. • ; 18.25 ... 0.91 ... 1.83 ... 20.99 27.35 ... 1.37 ... 2.74... 31.46 18.25 ... 0.91 ... 1.83... 20.99 2.00 ...0.10 ..• 0.20....2.30 • Parental Control Device Installation : 25.00 ... 1.25 ... 2.50... 28.75 Services REQUiR•Addressable Converter 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9, 1 10 11 121 13 14 1 15 16' 17 ; 18 19 20' 21 22 23 II II 24 I' 25 IIi 26 PROOF OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, declare that: I am over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the within action; my business address is 201 California Street, Seventeenth Floor, San Francisco, California 94111. On November 10, 1993, I caused the following document(s) to be served: RESPONSE OF ML MEDIA PARTNERS, L.P. DBA MULTIVISION CABLE TV CORP.(CA ID #0310) TO FCC 329 CABLE PROGRAMMING SERVICE RATE COMPLAINT BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA on the party of record in this matter by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, with first class postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail, at San Francisco, California, addressed as follows: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on November 10, 1993 at San Francisco, California. 56608.1 /-naR., Rivera ( WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES 5. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY EDWARD W. LEE ROGER W. SPRINGER BETH S. BERGMAN STEVEN B. OUINTANILLA MARY L. MCMASTER ARTHUR J. HAZARABEDIAN LAW OFFICES OLIVER, BARR & VOSE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION THE PARK 281 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET. SECOND FLOOR LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012 12131 621-2000 MEMORANDUM TO: onorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM:Cit harles S. Vose, Y Attorney DATE: March 16, 1994 TELECOPIER 12131 621-2211 RE: Oil Project - Reimbursement of City's Cost and Attorney Fees At the last City Council meeting a question was raised concerning the right of the City of Hermosa to recover its attorney fees and costs in defending any actions taken with respect to the approval of the Oil Conditional Use Permit and related matters. As the City Council is aware, the Resolution (93-5632) approving the Conditional Use Permit for oil development at the City maintenance yard included a provision which required the oil operator to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City from any action to set aside, void or annul the permit approval. Specifically, the condition of approval states as follows: " The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition." Pursuant to the conditions of approval of the C.U.P., the oil operator was required to post a $50,000.00 letter of credit which is to be used by the City for reimbursements of its attorney fees and costs for any subsequent litigation. The letter of credit only requires that the City submit a statement to the oil operator and provide an opportunity for payment prior to calling on the letter of credit. 8 (n‘rc Fes_1 OLIVER, BARR & VOSE Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers March 16, 1994 Page 2. The City has recently submitted to McPhearson Oil Company a request for reimbursement of attorney fees and costs which have been incurred as a result of the litigation challenging the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit. If these fees are not paid within a reasonable time, the City has the right to call upon the letter of credit and obtain full reimbursement. It is important to note that the $50,000.00 letter of credit does not constitute a maximum amount for which the City is entitled to reimbursement. Pursuant to the conditions of approval of the C.U.P., the City is entitled to full reimbursement of all attorney fees and costs associated with any legal challenge in this regard. In addition to the above, the City is entitled to full indemnification and a hold harmless by the permittee or any "claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit (C.U.P.) approval...". cc: Stephen Burrell, City Manager 20416 S., April 4,.1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: ENCROACHMENTS AND REQUESTS FROM RESIDENTS TO PURCHASE LAND Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council: 1. Not sell open space to residents at this time. 2. Direct staff to set a public hearing concurrently with the South School Park final design review to discuss and make recommendations on existing encroachments onto the site. Background At the March 22, 1994 meeting, Council reviewed a letter from Frances Parker, Paul Scanvell and Susan Fuhs requesting that the City consider selling parcels of parkland at the South School site to residents (Attachment A). Per the deed restrictions on the purchase of the park, the City has the right to sell this property as long as it remains zoned open space. Council directed staff to place this topic on the April 12 agenda and to add to it a discussion of any and all existing encroachments onto City property at the South School site. Attached you will find a map of parcels and the manner in which they are currently encroaching on City property (Attachment B). 1 Analysis Residents request: Sale of open space property The Commission submitted a conceptual plan for a neighborhood park with maximum residential (pedestrian) access. This plan included park entrances from all sides and was inclusive of an entryway at Sunset. The residents have requested land that may be designated for this pedestrian access per the conceptual plan (Attachment C). The City has retained the services of J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. Architects who will reexamine the park design and will prepare a final plan for the park. There are two (2) entrances possible from the northwest side of the park: one (1) at Sunset and one (1) at Loma Drive. The Commission favored access from both streets but the final plan may include just one (1). If Sunset is selected as a pedestrian access area, then it would obviously not be advisable for the City to consider selling this land. Furthermore, necessary notifications would need to be made to the residents ordering them to remove the fences that are currently on City property. Once the South School Park design is complete, if this entrance is not retained, it may be worthwhile for the Council to reconsider the request. Per the attached letter, the residents cite safety concerns with the potential addition of a pedestrian walkway adjacent to their property. In fact, (if it is constructed) this walkway will serve in a dual role for the City: as a park entryway and as an avenue for emergency vehicle access. As advised by the Commission, the park entries will be lighted for safety and will provide Police and the neighbors with improved visibility into the park. Experience with other areas in the City would suggest that the more "open" a park is, and the easier it is for Police to enter it from all sides, the less likely security problems will arise. In reviewing this topic (and other similar requests), the Commissioners also expressed that they felt that the majority of residents in the City would favor the retention of every square foot of open space the City owns. That is, based on the voting history of the City, the residents' value for parks and open space acquisition is high and favored over other land uses. 2 Encroachments The attached map of parcels notes the City property currently in use by residents. On the southwest side of the park, virtually every residence encroaches on the City property line. The existing fence may have provided some historical reason for the encroachments as it is placed 31' east of the actual property line. It is also noteworthy that due to the long term problems these residents have been subjected to with the abandoned school site, most of the encroachments have been made in the interests of landscaping an otherwise visually blighted area (one resident even installed a sprinkler system and lawn). Absent parcel #24 where a spa encroaches over 11' 9" into City property, the encroachments would not pose a significant problem to the construction of an adequate entryway from 4th and Culper. The City would still have ample room to landscape and create a pedestrian path while allowing for the portion of the property currently in use by residents. As with the request above, the key factor will be the final park design and the usability of the land in question to the City. Conclusions Council needs to make a policy decision that will either: • consider the retention of maximum open space for the City as the driving force for decisions; or • will favor allowing residents to encroach and/or purchase open space property if it does not compromise the master plan. Clearly the City needs to balance the overall needs of the community with the compatibility of the park to the neighborhood. In the Commission planning process, great care was taken to acknowledge the adjacent residents by creating a moderate impact park; by avoiding facilities with night lighting requirements; by creating an open and visible park to address security concerns; and by attempting to enable easy access for residents living in the immediate vicinity. 3 Investigating the encroachments will produce more questions than answers until a final architectural plan is approved by the Council. The City will want to keep the affected residents in the loop for all relevant decisions about the site including the park master plan. To combine a public noticing effort for both issues would be cost and time effective for the City and residents. Recognizing that the neighbors have been good caretakers of the existing site and that they will be the watchdogs for the park in the future, the City will need to approach the issue of encroachments with sensitivity in order to create a cooperative climate for park development. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Notify residents who are encroaching on City property to remove fences etc. 2. Direct staff to develop a plan to sell the open space land to residents as requested. 3. Request more information. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Letter from residents. Attachment B: List of parcels. Attachment C: Conceptual Plan: South School Park. Respectfully Submitted, M. , ' . ooney Community Resources Director / Assistant City Manager Concur: Amy Amarani Public Works Director 4 RECEIVED MAR - 8 1994 CITY ;.",uR. OFFICE Dear Mayor, Council Members and Commisioners of Parks and Recreation: ATTACHMENT "A" February 14, 1994 It has come to our attention that the South Park Project has included a small strip of land in the Northwest corner. This strip runs behind three houses. We are the owners of those houses (517, 521 and 531 Loma Drive). The land in question is depicted in the attached copy of the plan. The top right of the picture shows a pan handle that is 10 feet wide by 90 feet deep. This appears to be a portion of the park that may be more of a headache than it is useful. This area would be hard to light, it would be a safety concern and it would create a maintence problem. We are proposing that the city allows us to purchase this land. This would eleviate the city's responsibilty to the land, it would reduce development costs and provide additional funds to help offset the project's cost. The land had been appraised at about S10 a square foot a few years ago which would be a total sale price of 59,000. This cost would be split between the three homeowners. Thank you L.y/l/L.42-fte_ed 06-yleec,Oiv J � CCl/1vi.f- 53 j 4ctirA 314- 1.0a.Dr/ vL (over) bi 4 to 917'/ ti In �k1a ti 1� 1,0 0 "3.09•<< 16'12,7 69D A TT Cni o NlVos .'. 09 LZ 0� Or o0/ o n 92 't\ h\ 0 • r � s "Iv Z/ p666 171 9 OD -37 IC \s5 9 For 99'66 061-1g� w n 8 00/ ei‘\ 09 g ,LNHWHDvJ,Lv NI"Te4-1['l/J Plut (4 59 VI OOD c,r1.416.4 t fo 1-91 • // / ' I • AN 1 1•• VI 0 d 171041.7 50. ¢1-14r.-.44MIr44 15 t 1 )1.1 G A., C -11P,) Xv-9,-T• IN G 1-14,-1r4 / / / / / / / / 0 --\ - • 1. \ 411••••• —4aL 1 NI.P11%t L.4 .1-t•r!..6 P'E-w-vi- A • VA-e-k-rD gU t.J -r Valvt: 1.-r, vJ -- A- e?kakr p p4 14 141 / / / .1761A1%. PAr:: N��enG4.4 ISG f2c, 1 rot 15 41.4A a>.'f toN49- QNcR-oAcHlrtG 111 x 13 Loc- V`tAI,L., G%OUTH V T 2 G� p:AtJ-� 4j'S Eich 6466.0A%440,4G WO0n r NGC 0.1..J G Q4ALE1 1fJ 0 1 1-14-Roi,4H104 II. 1.1I NIAlki•-i IA NJ rH FQrz ,u►r.,r e., Gr ivd Ind Gy 1 OBJ ;.01 01 7 N r•J si*IN O N, d 7 - 714.1 �J •ki 11414-0.1 4.0n c'w -pe(0-0N - tV4,� ' Ni lal 'NI14.7-vo-V/N1 SIN 0.4 "JM 1r+1 4 -{V,} ZJ ;1 oa t2 6aArAr►vL -r:hnW -bl a1'vio ,? , .1._ 7N1 ag 'I 3914 H OI 7N1t1vvo-o rli • ATTACHMENT "0" 4.1 r. i 411 HAHI 0 L.1104•413 COt11t I 11110 OUR( 111 wA%K NAT troHT$ 4 111 71.1(1 ♦ L . • • ItOUr.(•A.I O• PvSttC P.O►C.t• • On[[Hnl1T ACC[SS I t• •• • re ,...r^nas• P [CrO .TION w..O cow-..wnr PtSOY.G.1 CO....11Ct1O CITY or HERMOSA DE ACI tornGrtAPIIIC SU.vCT SOU111 SC11001. PARK 1 t rU.R) rte. ri_AN • I 01 i --` aimrr, r. ..... - ... ,. — ...-.. April 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and members Regular meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1994 REDUCING PARKING ENFORCEMENT TIME LIMIT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND ONE HOUR PARKING AT LOWER PIER AVE. DURING THE MONTH OF MAY Recommendation: Receive and file. Background: At the March 8, 1994, City Council meeting, staff was directed to study reducing parking time limits from the current 8:00 p.m. enforcement limit to 5:00 p.m. This item was continued from March 22, 1994, City Council meeting. In addition the Downtown Enhancement Commission at their meeting of March 16, 1994, recommended that all meters located at lower Pier Avenue from Hermosa Ave. to Strand be bagged during the month of May, and to provide a one hour free parking until 6:00 pm.. Commission Recommendation: The Downtown Enhancement Commission is recommending to the City Council that: During May 1994, for one month, the meters on lower Pier Avenue be bagged and one- hour free parking until 6:00 p.m. be offered on a trial basis. Analysis: 1. REDUCING PARKING ENFORCEMENT TIME LIMIT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA There are total of 1614 parking meters in the City of Hermosa Beach. The majority of the meters are located in the residential district (1208 total). In these residential districts, 1 0 2 residents are allowed to purchase a parking permit for an amount of $27 annually which permits them to use parking space at any permitted time. Residents are permitted to park at these locations 24 hours per day. There are 247 total meters located in the downtown area (Exhibit 1). These meters are enforced from 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM. The cost of the meters are $.25 per half an hour. The following issues have been identified in regards to the reduction in parking meter enforcement: A. Revenue The are 247 total parking meters in the downtown area. The total potential annual revenue for the extended 3 hours is approximately $124,000. Assuming a 50% revenue collection between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. this could potentially reduce parking revenue by an amount of $62,000. Enforcement The City currently estimates $950,000 revenue annually from fines and tickets. If enforcement hours are reduced, revenue collected will decrease. Using a conservative estimate, if 35% of the total tickets issued are in the downtown area, a three hour (27%) reduction in enforcement would equal $90,000. The impact would probably be greater, since more tickets are issued in the evening hours. However, there might be some cost savings with reduction in enforcement hours. C. Allright Parking Operation Reducing parking enforcement time limits in the vicinity of the Allright parking operation will interfere with their ability to meet the requirements of their contract. D. Providing new stickers for signs The cost of providing new stickers for new time limits is approximately $4,000. E. Downtown Implementation Plan Proposals for the Downtown Implementation Plan have been received. The successful consultant will be studying the parking situation in the downtown area. The results of the study will be important in making any modifications to the parking in downtown. F. Coastal Commission Change of parking will normally require Coastal Commission's approval. However, in this case reducing parking enforcement time limits will provide more free parking for the beach goers, therefore Coastal Commission's approval might not be necessary. 3 2. ONE HOUR PARKING AT LOWER PIER AVE. DURING THE MONTH OF MAY The following issues have been identified in regards to the removal of the parking meters A. Revenue The are forty nine total parking meters on Pier Avenue from Hermosa to Strand on both sides of the street. The total potential revenue for a month is approximately $8085. Assuming a 50% revenue collection at these meters, providing free one hour parking could reduce the revenue by $4045. B. Allright Parking Operation Providing free parking in the vicinity of the Allright parking operation will interfere with their ability to meet the requirements of their contract. The impact would probably be greater on Allright parking operation, since most of their revenue is collected during the months of May June and July. C. Downtown Implementation Plan Staff is in the process of receiving proposals for the Downtown Implementation Plan. The successful consultant will be studying the parking situation in the downtown area. The results of the study is important in making any modifications to the parking in downtown. It takes at least one month for the users to get familiar with a new parking arrangements, and by the time users are familiar with the new one-hour parking, trial basis is done and meters are back in business. This will totally confuse users and might create more aggravations over tickets written. As mentioned earlier, the Downtown Implementation Plan is the best time to analyze the parking situation, and report the results and recommendations to the City Council. D. Coastal Commission Change of parking might require Coastal Commission's approval, since we are limiting parking hours and therefore providing less long term parking. E. Enforcement Revenue collected from enforcement will decrease. However, enforcement of one hour free parking will still be required. In addition, other businesses at Hermosa and upper Pier Ave might be requesting the same treatment which will increase the impact tremendously. 4 Fiscal Impact: By implementing both programs, the City faces potential revenue losses of over $160,000. Respectfully submitted: stir OM\11 Amy Amirani Director of Public Works i4 Wel/ '� - V-7-9/ Val Straser Chief of Police EtiediparzAccc/ Viki Copeland Director of Finance aa/parkdt.cc Steve Burrell "-A-46k_ City Manager MOBIL HOME PARK ZONE R-3 • Proposod Expanclad Downown Misinass gr Ga Enhancament DizIricT Bard St. O.S. o.s. M - 1 R-3 Monte rev Blvd. LEGEND Existing Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Boundary 3 Hour parking limit $.25 per 1/2 hour enforced 9: AM to 8:PM R R-3 -3 R-3 R-3 R-2 R-2 I R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1994 TO: Mayor and Council members FROM: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager RE: City Council / School District / Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Joint Study Session After selecting a tentative date of April 14, 1994 for the above mentioned joint study session, we were informed by the School District that this date would not accommodate one of their members. We have, therefore, selected two more dates that are agreeable to both the School District and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. They are as follows: THURSDAY, MAY 12, 1994, 7:OOPM OR THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 1994, 7:OOPM It is requested that Council consider and choose one of the above dates so that we may begin the notification and agenda preparation process. 11