HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/22/94C14 1 cc- e-ridt-trt
/zZlq q
Where there is no vision the people perish...
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating
in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your
interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often.
Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the
next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the
weekend before the meetings.
Opportunities for Public Comments
Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral-
ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's
or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included
in the Council's agenda packet with the item. tf eceived after packet com-
pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting.
Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual
basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the
notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the
Council.
It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be-
gin after.11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas
are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time
allowed.
Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M.,
Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays.
There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers.
(over)
THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager
appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council
policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager,
operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy
making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form
of City government in the United States today.
GLOSSARY
The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most
agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council.
Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one
vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may
remove an item from this listing, thereby c"ausing that matter to be considered
under the category Consent Calendar items=Removed For Separate Discussion.
Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by
law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni-
ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being
heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the
Hearing.
Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or
public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading
introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may
adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or-
dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances
are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements.
Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions
or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by
letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday
preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the
Council agenda.
Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion
by the City Council are placed here.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi-
nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action
by the City Council.
Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the
agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding
Wednesday.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council
may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council.
Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention
of a Council member after publication of the Agenda.
'Wax vault «%OPe yean'a gum. uc tlse afrcio.9, aad your dacy'a gaga eaaf.�y ea ae matatug.
- ek(eae ;ate
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 22, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Regular Session - 7:00 p.m.
MAYOR
Sam Y. Edgerton
MAYOR PRO TEM
Robert Benz
COUNCIL MEMBERS
John Bowler
Julie Oakes
J. R. Reviczky
CITY CLERK
Elaine Doerfling
CITY TREASURER
John M. Workman
CITY MANAGER
Stephen R. Burrell
CITY ATTORNEY
Charles S. Vose
All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly
every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the
Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the
Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council
foyer.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code,
the City Council is prohibited by law from taking immediate action on any Public
Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency
nature.
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the
Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public
hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to
one minute. Citizens also may speak:
1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings;
2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under
Municipal Matters; and,
3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments".
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations
are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager.
(b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1. Letter from Frances Parker, Paul Scannell and Susan Fuhs dated
February 14, 1994 regarding the South School site.
2. Letter from Carol Hunt, Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach
Chamber of Commerce, dated March 15, 1994, requesting approval for
closure of Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive on
June 19, 1994 for the "Pier Promenade Street Scene".
3. Memorandum from the Planning Commission dated March 17, 1994
regarding requested topics for discussion at the City Council/Planning
Commission Joint Meeting scheduled for March 29, 1994.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted
upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a
member prior to the roll call vote.
* Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items
removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.)
* Public comments on the Consent Calendar.
(a)
Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City
Council held on March 8, 1994.
(b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. through
2
inclusive.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to receive and file and February 1994 financial
reports:
(1) Revenue and expenditure report;
(2) City Treasurer's report; and,
(3) Investment report.
(e) Request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment of two public
works field personnel and one police sergeant. Memorandum from
Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated March 1, 1994.
(f) - Request for approval of criteria for distribution of in -lieu parking
spaces. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated
March 15, 1994.
(g)
Recommendation to approve award of contract to study consolidation
of beach cities fire departments. Memorandum from City Manager
Stephen Burrell dated March 16, 1994.
(h) Request from the Kiwanis Club to build a trash enclosure on City
owned .property. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated March 15, 1994.
(i)
Request to authorize the purchase of office furniture for the
downstairs area of the Police Department. Memorandum from Police
Chief Val Straser dated March 15, 1994.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
NONE
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar.
3
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
4. CABLE TELEVISION FCC FORM 393: DETERMINATION OF BASIC
CABLE TV RATES. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney
dated March 10, 1994.
5. TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE:
a) Historical sign exemption
b) To allow temporary grand opening and special event signs
c) To increase the amount that window signs are allowed to obscure the
windows from 20% to 50%.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 14, 1994.
6. FINAL ADOPTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT
REVISION AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
March 15, 1994.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. REPORT ON REDUCTION OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT TIME
LIMIT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. Memorandum from Public Works
Director Amy Amirani dated March 15, 1994.
8. REPORT ON BFI RATE INCREASE. Memorandum from City Manager
Stephen Burrell dated March 15, 1994.
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES FOR SOUTH SCHOOL SITE. Memorandum from Public Works
Director Amy Amirani dated March 14, 1994.
10. BILTMORE PARK MASTER PLAN. Memorandum from Community
Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 14, 1994.
11. REPORT ON OIL PROJECT - REIMBURSEMENT OF CITY'S COST
AND ATTORNEY FEES. Memorandum from City Attorney Charles Vose
dated March 16, 1994
12. LOS ANGELES COUNTY LIFEGUARD AND BEACH MAINTENANCE
SERVICES. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated
March 15, 1994.
4
•
13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
NONE
14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
NONE
15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items:
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item;
2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter
by Council action tonight.
a. Request from Council member Benz to discuss reducing Transient
Occupancy Tax to correspond with neighboring cities. Supplemental
Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 7, 1994.
(Continued from meeting of March 8, 1994)
b. Request from Council member Bowler for a document of support for
Assembly Constitutional Amendment 34 (Pringle) requiring funding for
mandated city programs. Letter from Assemblyman Curt Pringle dated
February 25, 1994 with a copy of the proposed constitutional amendment
attached.
c. Request from Council member Bowler to discuss a "Sunset" clause for all
new City ordinances.
d. Request from Council member Bowler for support for the Roberti Library
Assessment District Bill (SB 1448).
e. Request from Council member Benz to consider a 5 day work week for all
customer service related departments.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction
may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
RECEIVED
MAR - 8 1994
CITY ;.,GR. OFFICE
Dear Mayor, Council Members and Commisioners of Parks and Recreation:
February 14, 1994
It has come to our attention that the South Park Project has included a small strip of land in the
Northwest corner. This strip runs behind three houses. We are the owners of those houses (517, 521 and
531 Loma Drive). The land in question is depicted in the attached copy of the plan. The top right of the
picture shows a pan handle that is 10 feet wide by 90 feet deep. This appears to be a portion of the park
that may be more of a headache than it is useful. This area would be hard to light, it would be a safety
concern and it would create a maintence problem.
We are proposing that the city allows us to purchase this land. This would eleviate the city's
responsibilty to the land, it would reduce development costs and provide additional funds to help offset the
project's cost. The land had been appraised at about $10 a square foot a few years ago which would be a
total sale price of $9,000. This cost would be split between the three homeowners.
Thank you
S3j1--C A%.
a.%s
511- 1--0 tva ve_
(over)
bi
J
J
N 77'46 36'E
10.00'
r*
'V
N 12°10' 24 W
30.00'
2
0
1
N 77' 4?' 3014 102. 96'
1
•-5
qv
AMP
GRASS PLPr'AFit.
•
� h0•
eC)
o•
0
VE
•
r
43
�- -IZ
4 44
HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF,COM M ERCE
323 PIER AVENUE
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
(310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594
Mayor Sam Edgerton and
Members of the City Council
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
March 15, 1994
RE: Request for Approval of Business Promotion Event
Dear Mayor Edgerton and Members of the Council:
In its ongoing effort to promote all businesses in Hermosa Beach,
the Chamber of Commerce has undertaken development of a new event to
further this goal.
Instead of being inconvenienced during the Women's Professional
Volleyball Tournament on Sunday, June 19, downtown business and
business throughout the city can benefit from the large numbers of
visitors to our city. Following are our requests from the City and
the event outline which includes the Chamber's responsibilities.
We are requesting the following items for approval:
1) Closure of Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive.
2) Use of four white PVC barricades from 7 am to 6 pm on the event
day. The Chamber will assume responsibility for pick up and
delivery of barricades back to the City Yard.
Event Outline
Sponsor: Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce
Event: "Pier Promenade Street Scene"
Purpose: Promotion of all Hermosa Beach businesses
Date: Sunday, June 19, 1994
Time: Concurrent with tournament times
b2
Location: Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive. Open to
pedestrians, closed to vehicular traffic. (See site map)
Vendors: Open to all Hermosa Beach businesses ("locals only").
Not an arts and crafts event. Farmers Market
vendors may participate if items are not competitive with
lower Pier Avenue businesses.
Cost: Free to public. Exhibit space free to lower Pier Avenue
businesses, $45 space fee for other Chamber members, $55,.
space fee for non-members (includes sun canopy).
Exhibit Storefront businesses on lower Pier Avenue can reserve FREE
Spaces: display space on the sidewalk -directly in front of their
business. Other businesses can reserve spaces along the
median on Pier Avenue with displays facing storefronts.
Number A total of 30 exhibit spaces will be offered on both sides
of of the median. An additional 20 sidewalk spaces will be
Spaces: available to businesses located on Pier Avenue.
Assign- Chamber staff will assign display space to businesses not
ment of located on lower Pier Avenue': Assignment will be made
Spaces: based upon type of business, style of display and overall
visual impact of the event.
Food: Participating restaurants on lower Pier Avenue will have
outdoor cafe seating, following all health department and
ABC requirements. A limited number of food cart vendors
will be allowed if products do not compete with food sales
of restaurants and businesses on lower Pier Avenue. We
will encourage restaurants to rent umbrella tables, chairs
and outdoor space designation equipment in coordinating
colors and styles to achieve a uniform look.
Vendor All Hermosa Beach businesses will be contacted through
Recruit- direct mail of Hermosa Sun (Chamber newspaper) to all
ment: business license holders located in the city, media
releases, flyers, posters and telephone.calls by Chamber
volunteers and staff.
Music:
Site
Info:
Non -amplified, strolling musicians will provide event
entertainment. All entertainment must be auditioned and
pre -approved by Chamber staff. No stage entertainment.
The Chamber information booth will.be set up at the
intersection of Pier & Hermosa Avenues and will be staffed
throughout the event by paid and volunteer staff. Site
management during the event will be provided by paid and
volunteer staff.
-2-
Event A banner announcing the event day, time and name can
Promotion: be attached below the Women's Pro Volleyball
tournament banner which hangs at the Pier & Hermosa.
Avenue intersection prior to the event.
Insurance:
The Chamber will provide city -required $1 million
liability insurance naming the City as additional
insured.
Site The Chamber will hire Specialty Maintenance to
Cleanliness: provide clean up service and trash receptacle
emptying during the event and street and sidewalk
clean up at the conclusion of the event following
vendor tear down. The street will also be scrubbed.
prior to event.
No Parking
Signs:
The Chamber will provide the City with the required
number of "No Parking" signs to be posted prior to
and during the event. The signs will be laminated
and plastic ties will be provided. to prevent
unauthorized sign removal.
Traffic One barricade will be placed on Beach Drive south of
Management: Pier Avenue.. One manned barricade will be placed
north of Beach Drive with a sign indicating through
traffic into the Mermaid parking lot for customers
only. Two barricades will be placed on Pier Avenue
to prevent westbound traffic on Pier Avenue.
City Costs: The Chamber will reimburse the City for all direct
costs resulting from the event.
We respectfully request this letter be placed on.the March 22, 1994
council agenda under "Written Communications".
Thank you for consideration of our request. We are hopeful that the
approval of our request will be forthcoming. This event will help us
in achieving our mutual goal of economic vitality in Hermosa Beach.
Sincerely,
HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Carol Hunt
Executive Director
cc: Amy Amirani
Mary Rooney
P I
STRAND
Barri c.cic
BEACH DRIVE
Diana's.
enneseys
Duck Tails
Lighfhotne
Pier Markel
Coast
Drug
Classico
B o6 A
n
29
27
2 26
23 Z4
21 u
19 ZQ
17 18
I5
11
9
7
14
l2
l0
PIER AVENUE
WEST
BEACH DRIVE
Cantina
Real.
Jus{ Fishir+'
Pier 5ur4
Ice Crew
Avanti Jewelers
C•i s Fashions
L-ovy Dory
$Pontic,
Lyre ? Gimble, S.+J.
$eacS, Store
Pacific 5creenprin4
»RMOSA
AVE.
PIER AVENUE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Topic for Discussion at the City Council /
Planning Commission Joint Meeting
DATE:
March 17, 1994
The Planning Commission has requested that the following topics
be agendized for the March 29, 1994 joint meeting:
1. Conditional Use Permit / permitted use list study (currently
underway)
2. Small lot zoning standards
3. Permitted location of open parking on residential lots.
w/memo
b3
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California, held on March 8, 1994, at the hour
of 7:15 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Betty Martin, resident
ROLL CALL:
Present: Benz, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton
Absent: Bowler
PROCLAMATION - "SAVE YOUR VISION WEEK": Mayor Edgerton
proclaimed the week of March 6 through 12, 1994 as "Save your
Vision Week" and urged all Hermosa Beach residents to observe
this special week by paying extra attention to their visual
needs and the visual needs of their families. The Proclamation
was accepted by Dr. Warren Barr on behalf of the South Bay
Optometric Association.
PRESENTATIONS:
PRESENTATION OF A CHECK TO THE VETERANS MEMORIAL
COMMITTEE FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -
Warren Barr, O.D., Chamber of Commerce President, pre-
sented a check in the amount of $500 to Ken Marks,
Veteran's Memorial Committee Chairperson, who thanked
the Chamber for its donation and said that the slab
for the memorial was poured last Saturday and the Com-
mittee was now half way to its goal.
PRESENTATION OF A CHECK TO THE VETERANS MEMORIAL
COMMITTEE FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB - Dallas
Yost and Michael Schubach of the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis
Club presented a check in the amount of $1,000 to Ken
Marks, Veteran's Memorial Committee Chairperson, who
thanked the Kiwanis for its donation and said this was
the second check in the amount of $1,000 presented by
the Kiwanis.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, spoke regarding an
"Easy Reader" article on the City budget short-
fall of $350,000 and felt the emphasis on sales
tax revenue loss was misleading as sales tax was
only 9.8 percent of the City's revenue and the
sales tax decline amounted to one half of a per-
centage point in the total budget;
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., spoke regarding
the same article; said the $36,000 collected in
sales tax annually from restaurants that served
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page. 8446
ia
hard liquor seemed very low; said if there were
only 20 such establishments in the City that
would be $5.00 a day from each; suggested some-
thing was wrong and there should be an investiga-
tion; and,
June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, spoke regarding
Mayor Edgerton's stated concern that the Council
and Planning Commission should have no
"appearance of impropriety" and questioned his
purchase of a BMW from Vasek Polak so soon after
the completion of a City land sale to Mr. Polak;
questioned if any consideration given by Mr.
Polak on the vehicle sale would be shown on the
Mayor's financial disclosure statements. (City
Attorney Vose said that he had advised Mayor Edg-
erton that there was no conflict of interest.)
(b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations
(a) through (g), with the exception of the following items
which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown
in order for clarity: (c) Reviczky, (d) Benz, and (e)
Oakes.
Motion Benz, second Reviczky. So ordered, noting the ab-
sence of Bowler.
No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed
from the consent calendar.
(a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES:
1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of February
17, 1994; and,
2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 22, 1994.
Action: To approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular
Meeting of February 17, 1994 and the minutes of the Regular
Meeting of February 22, 1994 as presented. (Bowler absent)
(b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS Nos.
46627 through 46691 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos.
46628, 46629 and 46653.
Action: To ratify the demands an warrants as presented.
(Bowler absent)
(c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE
AGENDA ITEMS.
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8447
This item was removed from the consent calendar by Council -
member Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meet-
ing.
Assistant City Manager Rooney and City Attorney Vose re-
sponded to Council questions.
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented, with the deletion of the required at-
tendance by the Planning Commission at the joint meeting
with the School District and Parks, Recreation and Commu-
nity Resources Advisory Commission scheduled for April,
1994.
Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Edgerton. The motion carried
unanimously, noting the absence of Bowler.
(d) RECOMMENDATION FOR.AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE POLICE AND
PARKING ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES. Memorandum from Police Chief
Val Straser dated February 28, 1994.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by Council -
member Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting
due to a question regarding the request to waive formal
bidding on the Frankson's vehicles as the sole provider.
Police Chief Straser presented the staff report, responded
to Council questions and said the Frankson's GO -4 vehicles
were safer (had a roll bar) and more economical (had a Ford
Fiesta engine) than the Cushman vehicles.
Assistant City Manager Rooney and City Attorney Vose also
responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) authorize the purchase of one (1) 1994 Chevrolet Ca-
price police patrol/traffic vehicle through the Coop-
erative Purchase provisions of the Los Angeles County
Vehicle Contract, Bid #Q220 through Sopp Chevrolet for
a total cost of $17,196, to replace two (2) surplus
traffic vehicles both with over 100,000 miles on their
odometer;
2) authorize the purchase of one (1) 1994 Jeep Cherokee
4X4 beach patrol vehicle through the State Contract
Purchase Contract, bid #1-94-23-20 through Swift Dodge
for a total cost of $21,068 to replace the 1991 Jeep
Cherokee that has serious rust problems in the chas-
sis; and,
3) waive formal bidding per Municipal Code and award an
order to Frankson's, Inc., as the only available
dealer, for one (1) GO -4 electric utility vehicle for
a total cost of $21,068 to be purchased through the
AQMD Fund (the AQMD requires that 10 percent of all
City fleet vehicles be powered by alternative fuel),
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8448
with the understanding that the vehicle purchase was
authorized and funds appropriated in the 1993-94 adopted
budget. But, to direct staff to undertake a formal bid
process for three (3) generic gas utility vehicles (parking
enforcement) and bring the result back to Council as a fu-
ture agenda item.
Motion Benz, second Reviczky. The motion carried unani-
mously, noting the absence of Bowler.
(e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL
VOLLEYBALL CONTRACTS. Supplemental memorandum from Jim
Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Drive, dated March 8, 1994 for items
1(e) (1) and (2). Supplemental memorandum from Community
Resources staff dated March 8, 1994 for items 1(e) (1) and
(2) .
1) Association of Volleyball Professionals (AVP) Beach
Volleyball Tournament: 1994 World Championships.
Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary
Rooney dated March 1, 1994. Supplemental memorandum
from Community Resource Department staff dated March
7, 1994.
2) C.E. Sports and Entertainment American Beach Volley-
ball League (ABVL) 4 -Man Professional Beach Volleyball
Tournament. Memorandum from Community Resources Di-
rector Mary Rooney dated March 1, 1994.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by Council -
member Oakes for separate discussion later in the meeting.
Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff re-
port and responded to Council questions saying that Hermosa
Beach was the most expensive stop on the AVP tour.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with
the inspection of the grandstands saying the City
should require inspection by a certified inspec-
tor rather than City inspectors; said the AVP li-
ability insurance was too low and should be at
least $20,000,000; and the City should charge at
least $1,000 per day for set-up days;
Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, spoke regarding his
letter; expressed concern regarding the helicop-
ter, for camera coverage of the event, saying it
did not observe all safety precautions and its
flight pattern should be monitored; also spoke of
inadequacy of insurance for the event; and,
Matt Gage - Tour Director of the AVP, said the AVP had
asked for an extra set-up day for this event be-
cause last year the company that did the bleacher
set-up (the largest in the nation) had to work
after hours in order to accomplish the bleacher
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8449
set-up in time and the noise had caused com-
plaints.
Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community
Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to
approve the request from the Association of Volleyball Pro-
fessionals (AVP) to hold the two-man professional beach
volleyball tournament on the Hermosa Beach Pier Courts on
August 26-28, 1994 with:
1) permit fees of $10,962;
2) estimated Police fees of $9,478;
3) film permit location fees of $1,518.50;
4) co-sponsor fees of $500;
5) _estimated parking fees of $1,845;
6) sound permit of $38; and,
7) banner permit of $387,
for a total projected revenue to the City of $24,728.50 for
the tournament. And, with the understanding that staff
would ensure that all safety concerns would be met in an
appropriate manner.
Motion Benz, second Oakes. The motion carried unanimously,
noting the absence of Bowler.
Final Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Commu-
nity Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation
to approve the request from C.E. Sports and the American
Beach Volleyball League (ABVL) to hold the four -man profes-
sional beach volleyball tournament on the Hermosa Beach
Pier Courts on May 7 and 8, 1994 with:
1) permit fees of $4,179.40;
2) estimated Police fees of $1,840;
3) film permit location fees of $759.25;
4) co-sponsor fees of $500;
5) sound permit of $38; and,
6) banner permit of $387,
for a total projected revenue to the City of $7,703.65 for
the tournament.
Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried
unanimously, noting the absence of Bowler.
(f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE SOUTH BAY COALITION (FORMERLY
BEACH CITIES COALITION FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG FREE YOUTH,
INC.). Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary
Rooney dated March 1, 1994.
Action: To approve the Park, Recreation and Community Re-
sources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to:
1) approve the one-year lease agreement between the South
Bay Coalition and the City for the use of Room 4 in
the Community Center at a rate of $694 per month (798
sq.ft. X $.87 per sq.ft.) from April 1, 1994 through
June 30, 1994, and, $718 per month (798 sq.ft. X .$.90
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8450
per sq.ft.) from July 1, 1994 through March 31, 1995,
for a total rental income of $8,544; and,
2) authorize the Mayor to sign the lease. (Bowler absent)
(g) REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF
TWO COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS. Memorandum from Personnel
Director Robert Blackwood dated February 28, 1994.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for
30 days the temporary appointment of two Community Service
Officers. (Bowler absent)
•
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 94-1105 - HAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTIONS 30-23.1 AND 30-
23.2 TO CHAPTER 1 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO
PROVIDE A SYSTEM OF COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT TRANSIENT
OCCUPANCY TAXES AND PENALTIES FOR DELINQUENCY." For adop-
tion. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated
March 2, 1994.
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 94-1105.
Motion Reviczky, second Oakes.
AYES: Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton
NOES: Benz
ABSENT: Bowler
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION
Items 1(c), (d) and (e) were heard at this time but are
shown in order for clarity.
Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar
are shown under the appropriate item.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
4. REVISED PROPOSITION C AMOUNT FOR UTILIZING WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE
VEHICLES FOR FIESTA DE LAS ARTES. Memorandum from Planning
Director Michael Schubach dated March 1, 1994.
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions and said there had been a
miscalculation on the previously approved item and the
Chamber was now asking for less money.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., said she did not
think the Chamber of Commerce should get this
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8451
money as it could. be used for other purposes such
as paving streets; questioned whether Mayor Edg-
erton or Councilmember Bowler (absent) should be
allowed to vote on this item as they were on the
Chamber Board of Directors; also questioned As-
sistant City Manager Mary Rooney being on the
Chamber Board;
Carol Hunt - Chamber of Commerce Executive Director,
said that both Mayor Edgerton and Assistant City
Manager Rooney were non-voting City representa-
tives to the Board of Directors; said Councilmem-
ber Bowler was a voting member of the Chamber
Board.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve an
adjusted allocation of Proposition C funds for the Fiesta
de las Artes transportation vehicles for both week -end
events for a total cost of $6,731.43.
Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried unani-
mously, noting the absence of Bowler.
5. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A PASSENGER LOADING ZONE,
i.e. TAXI ZONE, AND A COMMERCIAL LOADING ZONE ALONG THE
MEDIAN OF PIER AVENUE WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE. Memorandum
from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated February 22,
1994.
Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Jim Hanneman - L.A. Yellow Cab representative, said
the downtown bar business was until 2:30 A.M. and
on week -ends and having cabs downtown was a serv-
ice to the City as it took inebriated potential
drivers off of the streets; and,
Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, said it was not a
good idea for cabs to park at the median, as peo-
ple getting into and out of cabs would be in the
traffic lane and apt to jaywalk; said this would
be a safety hazard; said downtown would start to
look like LAX; questioned if this would also al-
low limo parking.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Reso-
lution No. 94-5665, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERRMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING LOADING ZONES.", which establishes passenger
loading zones for taxi cabs and commercial loading zones
along the median ofPier Avenue west of Hermosa Avenue,
with the understanding that this item would be brought back
within 90 days for Council review.
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8452
Motion Benz, second Reviczky. The motion carried unani-
mously, noting the absence of Bowler.
The meeting recessed at 8:53 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:16 P.M.
6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
(a) TENTATIVE DATES FOR JOINT STUDY SESSIONS. Memorandum
from City Manager Stephen R. Burrell dated March 3,
1994.
Action: Mayor Edgerton directed, with the consensus of the
Council, that the date of Tuesday, March 29, 1994 at the
hour of 7:00 P.M. be set for the joint study session be-
tween the City Council and the Planning Commission.
(Bowler absent)
Final Action: Mayor Edgerton directed, with the consensus
of the Council, that the date of Thursday, April 14, 1994
at the hour of 7:00 P.M. be set for the joint study session
between the City Council and the Hermosa Beach School Dis-
trict; Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory
Commission; and, Planning Commission. (Bowler absent)
7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Edgerton said that two local photographers, Robbie
Hutas and John Post, would be willing to donate photographs
taken of Hermosa Beach to the City if the Council were
willing to accept and publicly display them. The Council
expressed interest and agreed with Mayor Edgerton's direc-
tion that the item be agendized for the Regular Meeting of
March 22, 1994.
8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Request from Councilmembers for possible future agenda
items:
(a) REOUEST FROM MAYOR EDGERTON FOR CLARIFICATION OF USE
OF PROCEEDS AND OIL INDEMNITY FUND.
Mayor Edgerton discussed his request and requested a clari-
fication and status report from the City Attorney.
City Attorney Vose said he would have a full report for the
Regular Meeting of March 22, 1994.
Mayor Edgerton directed, with the consensus of the Council,
that this item be continued to the Regular Meeting of March
22, 1994. (Bowler absent)
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8453
(b) REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER REVICZRY FOR DISCUSSION
REGARDING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS. Memo-
randum from Councilmember Reviczky dated March 1,
1994. Supplemental memorandum from City Manager
Stephen R. Burrell dated March 3, 1994.
Councilmember Reviczky discussed his request, said that
Hermosa Beach was eligible for up to $134,000 annually and
read a list of projects that other cities were doing with
their Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) which in-
cluded: graffiti removal; park development; sidewalk,
street and median improvement; We -Tip; juvenile diversion;
community resources improvement; business district beauti-
fication; ADA compliance; and seismic retrofits among other
things. •
After discussion, City Manager Burrell was directed to in-
vestigate possible Federal funding for the City storm drain
clean-up.
Action: To agendize this item and direct the City Manager
to report back with all of the requirements for the City to
again participate in the County Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Program.
Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried unani-
mously, noting the absence of Bowler.
(c) REOUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER BENZ TO DISCUSS REDUCING
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX TO CORRESPOND WITH NEIGHBORING
CITIES. Supplemental memorandum from Finance Director
Viki Copeland dated March 7, 1994.
Councilmember Benz requested that this item be continued to
the Regular Meeting of March 22, 1994 in order for Council -
member Bowler to be present.
(d) REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER BENZ TO DISCUSS THE
ELIMINATION OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL
AREAS AFTER 5:00 P.M.
Councilmember Benz discussed his request.
Action: To agendize this item for the Regular Meeting of
March 22, 1994 with the direction that staff provide infor-
mation on the policies of neighboring cities and the finan-
cial impact for Hermosa Beach.
Motion Benz, second Oakes. So ordered, noting the absence
of Bowler.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, expressed concern
that the sponsor of the AVP event approved by the
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8454
Council allowed children to have free non-alco-
holic beer and that this "beer" was allowed on
the beach; requested an analysis of the revenue
produced through sales tax and the cost to the
City through Police problems of the City's bars;
and,
June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, wished to clar-
ify that she had said nothing about conflict of
interest in regard to Mayor Edgerton's purchase
of a vehicle from Vasek Polak but had referred to
any consideration that may have been given by the
dealer as a disclosure on the next financial dis-
closure statement.
•
Councilmember Reviczky announced that Saturday, March 12, 1994
at 9:00 A.M. was the opening game of the Hermosa Beach Little
League season at Clark Field and invited the Council and the
public to attend.
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, March 8, 1994 at the
hour of 9:50 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, March 22,
1994 at the hour of 7:00 P.M.
lerni 6_, a 9ksg---
Deputy City Clerk
City Council Minutes 03-08-94 Page 8455
i
4. 'I
***SAY -CODE -TOTAL-**********-*********************.*****-**************** ►**********ar
-1325-00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST
FOR -03/07-/94 PAGE
' DATE -03/07/947/94
-
PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION- VND k ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF
- --DATE INVC ---- - PROD k -------- -ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION ---------- AMOUNT UNENC DATE Ek CHKX k
-" -- -XP
--TIME-09;53:31
H AMERICAN PLANNING-ASSOCIATION------00834-----001--400-4101-4317
LANNING-ASSOCIATION -
008,4-001--400-4101-431-7-00097
CONF REG/K. ROBERTSON R-422 03/03/94 PLANNING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
5325-00 TR 422-00422--- 46693
$0.00 03/03/94
. G
- -- ***.VENDOR -TOTAL
**********************************************+Fir**t**r**********il***—
$325.00
•
-----R-- - ADVANCE ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR MAINT/MAR 94, 32235
..** VENDOR --TOTAL-***************************** ***************************
$100.-00
I'
I•• Y
i•'
00003----001-400-4204-4201 --- 00652 - - $100.00- •
03/01/94 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 32235 030 033/02/02
30.00 /
/94
L, •i
_I
• -_***--VENDOR-TOTAL**********************************************N-*********•
**********r
$1-50-00
----AMERICAN EAGLE
BUS/COMM RES YOUTH TRIP
03118- 145-400-3409-4201- --00105--------- -$100. 00----
02/28/94 . REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
***_VENDOR-TOTAL********************************************************************
R --- AMERICAN SOC.-- OF CIVIL ENGRS
ANNUAL DUES/A. AMIRANI 01956 001-400-4202-4315- 00085 $150.00
02/23/94 PUS WKS ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP
$1Q0-00
•
07991 --- -46697
$0.00 03/02/94
'BIu J
.111
he 1
,:::_----***-VENDOR-TOTAL- *******-r-* ****************************r**** ---
314r008-00
BEACH TRAVEL 00252 001-400-1201-4316 00102 -- $141-00
AIRFARE/ST LANDS HEARING 28095 03/01/94 28095 '07416 - 46700
CITY MANAGER /TRAINING 20.00 03/03/94
08074 - - 46698
$0. 00 03/03/94
R ---- BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION ------ -03422----001-400-2101-6900-00617----- 314,008.00--87-2222040-640 - 00076 46699
FINAL PMT/PATROL CARS 0-640 - 03/01/94 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS
20.00 03/07/94
***- VENDOR -TOTAL --******************4*****************************+r*******************
5 f 41-00-
-----R.--- VINCE*BRUCCOLIERI -------- ---
03973 ---001"400-2201-4316- 00390--- ------$175:-00
REIMB TRAINING EXPENSE 03/01%94 FIRE /TRAINING
***-VENDOR-TOTAL-
R- -- STEPHEN R.*BURRELL
TRAVEL EXP PER AGREEMENT
$173-00
05621---001-400-1201-4316-00101 "--'----$970771
02/28/94 CITY MANAGER /TRAINING $0.00 03/07/94
06237 - 46701
$0.00 03/02/94
•
07414 '- -46702'•
•
I
L o
FINANCE-SFA340
---TIME 09:53:31
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL -
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/07/94
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 44 AMOUNT
DATE INVC - PROJ 44 - ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ----
PAGE
-----
BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY --- ---
PKG PERMIT ENV/HANDOUTS 3/438
PAGE 0002 I
DATE 03/07/94---
INV/REF PO 44 CHK *
- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$970..-71
-00034-----110-400-1204-4305---00086 ---$571-A4----202175/553/438 06984 - 46703
02/09/94 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $552.00 03/02/94
*t*. -VENDOR -TOTAL- ******************* *********************************************** $57-1-14
R CA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC. 00598 001-400-1141-4315 00051 $75.-00
ANNUAL DUES/J. WORKMAN 02/02/94 CITY TREASURER /MEMBERSHIP
•**-VENDOR_TOTAL-*******************.************************************************* $75.00
CALIFORNIA CHARTER
BUS/COMM RES SENIOR TRIP 53624
08303 -- • 46704 ---
$0.00 03/02/94
-05595-------145-400-3409-4201--- 00106---------$469.-78-----------Y53624 07992 --- -46705 --
'02/28/94 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/03/94
--- "** VENDOR-TOTAL-************************.****.*******.********************a************ $469.7
•
_ **-*-VENDOR_TOTAL-*****.************.***************-********.**.**.*.*.*.**.**.**.************-*.** $392,-89
R •- DEAN*CALTOGIRONE
CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 07967
05618 -----1 10-300-0000-3302 ----56873 - - $102.00---2204032/307967.- 06437 46706
02/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/02/94
***-VENDOR--TOTAL-********************************************************************
R -. CARTER ENGINEERING
MOTORCYCLE OFCRS EQUIP
$102-00
----- -- 03534 - ---- 001-400-2101-5401---00097- ----- $392.89---------00036631-07731--- 46707
36631 01/14/94 POLICE /EQUIP -LESS' THAN $500 $392.69 03/02/94
R-- . CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
R - CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
R —.- CHAMPION CHEVROLET -
MISC AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
00014 -- ---001-400-2101-4311-01804----=--- $331:-09
02/28/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00014 001-400=4204-431-1-00259 $176--98
02/28/94 BLDG MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00014---001-400-6101-4311-00337 $12.43
02/28/94 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00014 110-400-3302-4311 00941 $86708
02/28/94 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01013 -- 46708
$0. 00 03/02/94
01013 - 46708 -
$0.00 03/02/94
01013 --46708
$0.00 03/02/94
01013-
1013-
I.
46708-----
46708------
$0.00
$0.00 03/02/94
r
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 09:53:31
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0003
FOR -03/07f94. DATE -03/07/94
PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK k
DESCRIPTION-- --- ---DATE INVC - PROJ 4 ------ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
----.00 VENDOR -TOTAL
0606..58
-R --- - CN VIDEO ONE HOUR PHOTO 05620-- 001-300-0000-3115 06413 --------$100:00 04372- 46709 --
BUSINESS ----
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND. 02/28/94 /BUSINESS LICENSE $0.00 03/03/94
R -CN-VIDEO-ONE-HOUR-PHOTO 05620 001-300-0000-3207--02048 $43.50 04372 46709 -
COMM INSPECTION REFUND 02/28/94 /OCCUPANCY PERMITS $0.00 03/03/94
- *** VENDOR TOTAL *+►#********arpt*at*ar*itrpt*at*its►**tt******ar****itr**-i►i►ata►it**********rpt*i►rat**at
$143.-50
R -DAPPER-TIRE-CO. 01390-001--400-3103-431-1-00970 $308-94 106383/106382-01019- 46710 ----
STREET SWEEPER TIRES 06382 02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/02/94
- *** VENDORTOTAL-********************************************************************-
$308. 94
•
11
•
11
R
, DYNAMED 01498— —
001-400-2201-4309-01589 $70-2v 74470101023 46711-
PARAMEDIC SUPP/FEB 94 44701 02/09/94 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/02/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** --$70:25
R EFRAM MOBIL 01400001-400-21-01-431-0-00446 $62-48 N36991-4--01028 46712 --
MOTORCYCLE GAS/FEB 94 69914 02/28/94 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 03/02/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$62:'48
R GASB -ORDER -DEPARTMENT 00669-001-400-1202-4316-00481 $4 7839 46713
PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE 03/02/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 03/03/94 '
***--VENDOR TOTAL-******************************************************************** $40700
•
I
R GTE -CALIFORNIA, ---INCORPORATED 00015 001-400--1-101-4304-00623 $1 1030 46714 ---
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
- R----OTE-CALIFORNIA,- INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304---00701 -$0.66 01030'---46714 --
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
R GTE -CALIFORNIA. --INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1122-4304— 00078 $0-44 01030- 46714----
1 FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 ELECTIONS /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
ode
FINANCE-SFA340
----TIME 09:53:31-- --
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004
FOR -03/07/94 DATE 03/07/94 -
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # J
DESCRIPTION -.DATE INVC- . .- . PROJ #---..... ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION --------------------- -- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
_R GTE CALIFORNIA..._ INCORPORATED 00015. 001-400-1201-4304--00776 • $1.-48 01030 ---46714-------
FAX DILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED -------00015-- ---001-400-1203-4304 -- 00784--- -------- $3.70 01030 46714
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94 I:
01030-----46714----- I,`.
1
R GTE -CALIFORNIA. -INCORPORATED 00015_____-001-=400=-1206-4304 00707 $1,--08
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE
-GTE CALIFORNIA.. INCORPORATED
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES
$0.00 03/02/94
00015- 001-400-1207-4304---- 00575------ ------$3:-21 01030 ------ 46714- -
02/28/94 DUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94 1.7
01030 46714 ---•`=
$0.00 03/02/94
Z,I J
R GTE -CALIFORNIA. --INCORPORATED 00015-----001400-2101-4304---01387 $11-1-7-7
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 . POLICE /TELEPHONE
R -.- GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -00015------001-400-4101-4304---00776 - $5.38 01030 -- --46714
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 - PLANNING /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
R .GTE--CALIFORNIA.--INCORPORATED 0001-5 e01-100-4202-4304-00842 $2-24 01030 46714
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
R __ - GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED ------00010----001-400-4202-4304.- .00843 -$72-11 01030 - - 46714
FAX DILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
R GTE CALIFORNIA,. -INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00762 $34-42 01030 46714 --
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $0.00 03/02/94
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES
00015 ------001-400-4601-4304 -- 00889 ---- 360.-3
02/28/94 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
01030 --'-- 46714
$0.00 03/02/94
R GTE -CALIFORNIA, --INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-1204-4304-00095 id -20 01030-46714
FAX BILL/PRIVATE LINES 02/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
- *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************** ***************+r******** -r- —$299--91
R -- GTEL
EQUIP RENT/FEB 94
01340 001-400-2101-4304-01386 $51-56 01033 46715--
02/22/94 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/02/94
----***-VENDOR-TOTAL*******a************************************************************
$51.56
R HERMOSA DCH -CITY -SCHOOL -DIST. 02066-001-400-6101-4251-00033 $1r000-00 00074 46716 -
FIELD MAINT/FED & MAR 94 03/01/94 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 03/02/94
; •
IJ
"I
f
I 11
3,
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 09:53:31
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005 0
FOR 03/07/94 DATE 03/07/94
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************+rte********----. - --51,000.00
R LARRY*HEYERT
WINTER CLASS REFUND
05623 001-400-4601-4201 02150 $60.00 07993 46717
03/01/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/03/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - — - --$60.00
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC ...-. . 02458 - 001-202-0000-2021 00593 $4.44 01037 46718
DISCOUNT OFFERED 02/28/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 03/02/94
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
DISCOUNT TAKEN
02458- 001-202-0000-2022 00586 $4: 44CR-------- - 01037 --- 46718
02/28/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 03/02/94
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00982 $258.02
ELECTRICAL SUPP/FEB 94
02/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******'**************************************************************- --$258:02
- 01037
50. 00
46718
03/02/94
R L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITAN 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00183 $806.00 CR -20926 06433 46719
BUS PASS SALES/FED 94 20926 02/24/94 BUS PASS SUDSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5806.00 03/02/94
-*** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************ir************** $806700
R YACINTO*LANE
TOWING FEE REFUND
05622 - 110-400-3302-4201- 00435 - - $30.00
02/23/94 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$30.00
07789 46720
$0.00 03/03/94
R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES .. -00317 • 001-400-4101-4317----00098. $230.00 - TR -421 00421 46721
CONF REG/M. SCHUBACH R-421 03/03/94 PLANNING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 03/03/94
-_..*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$230-00
R LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON 02175 001-400-1203-4201 01182— - ----$443.75 - 07199 46722
LEGAL SERV/JANUARY 94 03/02/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/03/94
• - *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************-
$443:75
R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH 00183 001-400-3101-4251 00031 $556.38 - 11371 OB075 46723
HALF YEAR MEDIAN MAINT 11371 02/15/94 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
{. n t'.•C�,. pct l it,Y�2.-U A :rty •C!i�iC'- ','VS. .D,. .. �-M 5"� 'M 1�•�nw_ Ija}* .- •:�. -
� D.M ,._ t.!i,�;S J,. r. .- ,. ....10k*, ,,,J.�Sf,� ,u�� ,�..3t1''3-i1. .•r`4,.,
•
$0.00 03/03/94
••
4,
4,
E•
e•
Ql
Q't
FINANCE-SFA340
•---.TIME-09:53:31 ------
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/07/94
PAGE 0006
DATE 03/07/94-1
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC-----PROJ #----- -ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
INV/REF
-***-VENDOR-TOTAL-*************** +r+r******************** ** ************************** $556-30
------- R - --- MANHATTAN -FORD
MISC AUTO PARTS/FEB 94 2/612
00605- 001-400-2101-4311---01802
PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$287-97--146628/552/612- 01046 ----46724
02/28/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL-********************************************************************
----R-- - -VALERIE*MOHLER
CSUDH GRADUATION FEES.
287-9
00956 001-400-1202-4316 00482 $35.00
03/03/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING
***-VENDOR TOTAL -**************************-M*************- ***-►***-r****************** t
R- - - MONARCH BROOM - - --
ST SWEEPER GUTTER BROOMS 09664
$0.00 03/02/94
35-00
07840 --.-46725 --
$0.00 03/07/94
00084 001-400-3103-4309- -- 01629- -- ----- $844.-34 - 09663/09664-01049-- 46726 -
02/08/94 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/02/94
I**-VENDOR-TOTAL****************************************.,,rr,HI;r:-*„
R
OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 94
OLIVER, -•BARR-&-VOSE
844-34
02892 4001-210-0000-2110- 05642------ -$841.- 50
03/01/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
02892-001-400-14-31-4201-00833
LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 94
- R---- OLIVER. BARR & VOSE
LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 94
$t5,-635,7
03/01/94 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
07415 --- 46727 ---
$0.00 03/03/94
07415 46727
$0.00 03/03/94
02892 001-400-1131-4201-- 00834 53x763.-25 07415 = 46727--
03/01/94 420001 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/03/94
n*VENDOR-TOTAL-*******************-***.*.*4*********a►a*******-***********************41.-4 20,-244-50
OVERBYTE COMPUTERS ---------
BACKUP UTILITY/NETWORK 84109
04739 001-400-1206-4201—=01248 $137.48 84109--04072--------46728 -----
02/03/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $137.48 03/02/94
***__VENDOR-TOTAL-******************b*************************************************
R --- PACTEL CELLULAR - LA
MOBILE PHONE CHGS/FEB 94
03209 170-400-2103-4304--00129 $232-92 01053------46729
02/28/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TELEPHONE
**-VENDOR--TOTAL-******************************************************************** $232-92
R. PAGENET
PAGING SERV/MARCH 94 50687
$0.00 03/02/94
02487 001-400-1201-4201--00198 $11.-00---- A250687-00049-- -46730 -
03/01/94 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 50.00 03/02/94
J
4
m
�IJ
•
FINANCE-SFA340
i -----TIME 09:53:31-
PAY VENDOR NAME
• . -- DESCRIPTION
-R- PAGENET
PAGING SERV/MARCH 94
R
- PAGENET . ... _ . . .......
PAGING SERV/MARCH 94
PAGENET
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR -03/07/94
PAGE 0007 ,
DATE 03/07/94--
VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO 0 CHK *
-DATE INVC- PROD 0 -- --ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION - - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
02487--001-400-1203-4201---01181
50687 03/01/94 PERSONNEL
$11..00 A250687--00049 --- 46730 ------
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/02/94
- 02487------001-400-1206-4201 -01249- - $11:-00 A250687
. 50687 03/01/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
PAGING SERV/MARCH 94 50687
- • - PAGENET
PAGING SERV/MARCH 94
PAGENET
02487-----001 -400 -2101 -4201 01455
03/01/94 POLICE
- 02487 --- ---001-400-2401-4201 - 00418
50687 03/01/94 ANIMAL CONTROL
PAGING SERV/MARCH 94 50687
R .. -- PAGENET .
PAGING SERV/MARCH 94 50687
02487 001-400-4202-4201- -00437
03/01/94 PUB WKS ADMIN
02487--
03/01/94
001-400-4601-4201- 02149
COMM RESOURCES
00049 46730
$0.00 03/02/94
3193.30 A250687 00049
46730 ---
/CONTRACT
-
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/02/94
-$11.00 - A250687--00049 --- - 46730
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00 03/02/94
3110700 A250687 - 00049 ------46730
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/02/94
-
-$22.00. - -A250687 -00049--- 46730
/CONTRACT- SERVICE/PRIVAT
***-_VENDOR-TOTAL_******************************************************************r $369.30
- PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE -SERV -----03910-----001 -400-2101-4311-01803.----- ---$32750
FRONT-END ALIGN/HB-3 1879 02/14/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
$0.00 03/02/94
R PORTERS -ALIGNMENT -.&.BRAKE -SERV 03910 110-400-3302-4311-00940 $327-50
FRONT-END ALIGN/PKG CAR 1899 02/24/94 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL-******************************************************************** $65-00
R LAURA*ROZZI
WINTER CLASS INSTRUCTOR
04623-001-400-4601-4221-00410 $5350
1879--07784 --- -46731
• $32.50 03/02/94
1899 07784
46731 .---. ---
$32. 50 03/02/94
02/24/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR
-- *** VENDOR-TOTAL*******************************************************************w
R SUSAN*SAXE-CLIFFORD,PH D
RETURN TO WORK EXAM 218-1
---***-VENDOR TOTAL
00839
02/18/94
001-400-1203-4320-00499 X950-00 f\ 4 0218-1-07197
.PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENTrEXAMS $0.00 03/03/94
$535-50
07990 46732-
$0.00 03/03/94
46733- - -
$9507 0
6733----
$950..-'0
R -SHERIFF-'S-DEPARTMENT 00151 001-400-2101-4251-00530 $2297-32
BOOKING FEES/NOV 93 10052 02/22/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
10052-00035 46734-
30.00 03/02/94
_I•
: o
J
0
•
FINANCE-5FA340
-TIME-07:53:31
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR -03/07/94 .
PAGE 0008
DATE --03/07/94 '
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # '
--- - DESCRIPTION DATE--INVC- PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION - AMOUNT UNENC-. DATE EXP
***-VENDOR-TOTAL- $229-32
-SMART & FINAL -IRIS --COMPANY
PRISONER SUPP/FEB 94 15165
00114- 001-400-2101-4306 -01514-------$62.-28
02/14/94 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
***_VENDOR-TOTAL-***************************************i►**************************** $62-28
.J
5215165 - 01062 --- 46735 -
$0.00 03/02/94
R --- SO.- CAL SHARPSHOOTER, INC. ---------02250 001-400-2101-4201----01454 $416.25 - - .------51861 - 01068 -- 46736
PRACTICE SHOOTS/AUG-JAN 51861 02/03/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/02/94
-*** VENDOR TOTAL--****************************************-**************************** $41.6-25
•
R -- SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT --------00118---110-300-0000-3302-- 56875------$17,032:00 - ---- -- - 06438 -- 46737
CITATION SURCHARGE/JAN94 03/01/94 . /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/03/94
***_VENDOR-TOTAL-****************************************************-*******-********-*- $1-7,-032.00
I .,
---R - - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. -- 00170 -001-400-4204-4303 00761 - - -$383-31 1726101157192 01067 - 46738
• GAS BILL/COMM CTR/FEB 94 57192 02/28/94 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 03/02/94 wif
***-VENDOR-TOTAL-******************************************************************** $3831.
-- R --- - STANDARD CONCRETE PRODUCTS -
05195 --001-202-0000-2021--00594
DISCOUNT OFFERED 89781. . 02/28/94
$3. 00
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
•
189781-01014 -- -46739'
$0.00 03/02/94
,
•- R STANDARD -CONCRETE -PRODUCTS 05195001-202-0000-2022-00597 $3-OOCR 189781-01014 46739
DISCOUNT TAKEN 89781 02/28/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 03/02/94
R -- STANDARD CONCRETE PRODUCTS- 05195 001-400-3103-4309- 01630 $278.-95 - 189781-01014-- -46739 - ---
CONCRETE PURCHASES/FEB94 89781 02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/02/94
***-VENDOR TOTAL-**************************************************************a►***rM $278-95
---- R-- --- V & V MANUFACTURING
- 01938.----001-400-2101-4187-00600---------$233.-71 2218 -07749 ------46740
CAPT'S BADGES/POLICE 2218 02/07/94 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
***_VENDOR-TOTAL-******************************************************************** $2337
R TERESA*WEBSTER
05619---110-300-0000-3302 - 56874- - - $60-00
CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 02089 02/23/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING
$233. 71 03/02/94
6102089-06436 ------ 46741 ..
$0.00 03/02/94
J
•
•.
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME -09:53:31
PAY VENDOR NAME
-- - ---- DESCRIPTION
*** _-VENDOR--TOTAL-
-------R----- -WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY ------
ANNOTATED PENAL CODE 80506
***-VENDOR TOTAL-.**************air*********r.***********.*******************************
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
..FOR 03/07-494
PAGE 0009, -'
DATE 03/07/94 1.
VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC- PROJ #-- ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
INV/REF PO * CHK # :I'
AMOUNT UNENC -DATE EXP
$60:00
00141-- 001-400-1132-4305------00002 - - $285.-78
02/07/94 CITY PROSECUTOR /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
R •-• JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
R -JOHN M. *WORKMAN, PETTY- CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
R--- -• • JOHN M. *WORKMAN, PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
$285,78
05125 ------001-400-1121-4305 - 00272 ---- ---- --$32:45
02/28/94 CITY CLERK /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
05125-001-400-1206-4305 - 00662 $14.05
80506 07770 - 46742
4360.47 03/02/94
02/28/94. DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
-05125----001-400-2101-4305- - 02150 -$45.68-
02/28/94.
$45.68-02/28/94. POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
R JOHN-M.*WORKMAN, PETTY -CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
- R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
R -JOHN M. *WORKMAN,- PETTY -CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
R
- - JOHN M. *WORKMAN, PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
JOHN -M.-*WORKMAN,-PETTY-CASI
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
05125 001-400-2101-4316-01103 $24-00
08309 46743
$0. 00 03/02/94
08309 ----- 46743 -
$0. 00 03/02/94
- -08309.- - -46743 --
$0.00
--
$0.00 03/02/94
02/28/94 POLICE /TRAINING •
05125 - ----001-400-2201-4305 ---00664 $11710
02/28/94 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
05125-001-400-2201-431-6-00389 $20-00.
02/28/94 FIRE /TRAINING
05125----- 001-400-4101-4316- -00280 $23.95
02/28/94 PLANNING /TRAINING
1 05125----001-400-4102-4305-00195 $48-68
JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
R JOHN M *WORKMAN, -PETTY -CASH
PETTY CASH/2-15 TO 2-28
02/28/94 PLANNING COMM /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
05125 001-400-4601-4305 01230 $13.88
02/28/94 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
05125 001-400-4601-4308-00960 $38-96
02/28/94 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
***-VENDOR'TOTAL********************************************************************
R XEROX- CORPORATION
COPIER MAINT/USE-JAN 94 49280
$272775
08309 46743-
$0.00 03/02/94
08309 46743 -.-
$0. 00 03/02/94
08309=-- 46743 ---
$0.00 03/02/94
08309 ------- 46743
$0.00 03/02/94
08309 46743"--
$0.00 03/02/94
08309- --'-' 46743-- --
$0.00 03/02/94
08309 46743'
$0.00 03/02/94
00135 001-400-1-208-4201-01-1-09 $397-05 040649280-00007 46744-
02/07/94 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 • 03/02/94
•
S
o.
FINANCE-5FA340
--TIME-09:53:31
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010;
FOR --03/07/94. DATE --03/07/94
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION - -DATE-INVC- PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ----------AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
***_VENDOR-T0TAL--*****************************************************************4**
$397.-05
- - *** PAY CODE-. TOTAL****************************************************************** -- ----$65,572.30
***-TOTAL-WARRANTS-******************************************************************-----$65,8977-30
•
•
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED EY i''
_THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES/ / TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE
• WARRANT REGISTER FOR alills, /s, ARE ACCURATE,
FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE
TO THE BUDGET
BY
FINANCE D tECTOR
DATE
C
•
•
v
--FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:55:52
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND -LIST
FOR 03/14/94.
' PhGE 0001
DATE 03/14/94
-1,I J
VND M-- ---.ACCOUNT NUMBER - • TRN M ------ —AMOUNT-- - INV/REF.....- . -. - PO M CHK M
DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
H FESTIVAL OF ARTS/LAGUNA BEACH 03379 001-400-4601-4201 02173 $2,370.00
TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 03/10/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************•************************n*************************- 132,370.00
08501 46746
$0.00 03/10/94
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94
V '
00243 001-202-0000-2030 00616 $217,179.71
03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
46692
$0.00 03/10/94
00243 105-202-0000-2030 00341 $8,903.74
03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00
46692.
03/10/94
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 109-202-0000-2030 00140 $551.12
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT .00243 110-202-0000-2030 00345 $37,997.81
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94
$0.00
/ACCRUED .PAYROLL $0.00
46692
03/10/94
46692
03/10/94
H • HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 115-202-0000-2030 00199 $3,548.66' 46692
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 03/10/94
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 125-202-0000-2030 00058 $689.37 46692
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 03/10/94
di
w. I
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 145-202-0000-2030 00337 3438.49 46692
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 03/10/94
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 146-202-0000-2030 00060 $1,634.15
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 152-202-0000-2030 00023 $313.44
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00338 $6,774.18
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00335 $10,233.44
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 170-202-0000-2030 00192 $6,820.16
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94 03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL
0
$0.00
46692
03/10/94
46692
03/10/94
o
46692
03/10/94
46692
03/10/94
I.,.I
L.'
1.'
46692
03/10/94
I�
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-94
•
00243 705-202-0000-2030 00299 $4,575.26 46692
03/02/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 03/10/94
4111.
-- FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:55:52
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND -LIST .
FOR 03/14/94
PAGE 0002
DATE 03/14/94
---------- VND N . ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * - • AMOUNT-- ..---INV/REF - PO M CHK *
DATE INVC PROD M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC. DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
H LOS ANGELES DODGERS, INC.
TICKETS/COMM RES•TRIP
$299,659.53
00080 001-400-4601-4201 02172 $279.00
03/10/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
08503 46745
$0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL****#***************************************************************
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
$279. 00
00026 001-400-1213-4180 00760 $103,443.21
03/10/94 ' RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT
$0. 00
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT ADV/FEB 94
00026
03/10/94
00026
03/10/94
001-400-1213-4180 00761 $86,734.96CR
RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT
001-400-1213-4180 00762 $87,106.02
RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT
$0.00
$0. 00
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
00026 105-400-2601-4180 00229 $1,384.21
03/10/94 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT
SYS. 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00094 $93.30
03/10/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/RETIREMENT
$0. 00
$0.00
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
,H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
00026 110-400-1204-4180 00032 $1,780.21
03/10/94 FINANCE CASHIER /RETIREMENT
00026 110-400-3302-4180 00236 $2,912.93
03/10/94 PARKING ENF /RETIREMENT
$0.00
46747 �.
03/10/94
46747 �...,
03/10/94
46748
03/10/94
46747
03/10/94
46747
03/10/94
46747
03/10/94
46747
$0.00 03/10/94
• i H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
- i RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
'
'I
,1
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
00026 155-400-2102-4180 00199 $66.73
03/10/94 CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT
00026 160-400-3102-4180 00231 $1,145.84
03/10/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
•
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
$0. 00
46747
03/10/94
46747
$0.00 03/10/94
00026 170-400-2103-4180 00097 $1,933.59
03/10/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /RETIREMENT
00026 705-400-1209-4180 00149 $269.89
03/10/94 LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT
46747
$0.00 03/10/94
$0. 00
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/JANUARY 94
00026 705-400-1217-4180 00151 $290.44
03/10/94 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT
$0.00
46747
03/10/94
46747
03/10/94
•--- FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:55:52
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND -LIST
FOR 03/14/94
PAGE - - -- 0003
DATE 03/14/94
PAY VENDOR NAME VND #--- -ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT------INV/REF PO M CHK
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ k ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL *********************** ****************************air************** $113,691.41
*** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $415,999.94
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 001-400-2101-4201 01460 $2,381.50 11563 00048 46751
RADIO MAINT/MAR 94 11563 03/01/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/10/94
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS. 00935 001-400-2201-4201 00461 $205.00 11563 00048 46751.
RADIO MAINT/MAR 94 11363 03/01/94 _ FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/10/94
ADVANCED ELECTRONICS
RADIO MAINT/MAR 94
00933 . 110-400-3302-4307 00109 $239.50
11460 03/01/94 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,826.00
11460 00058 46751
$0.00 03/10/94
R ALLTECH ELECTRONICS 05270 001-400-1206-4305 00666 $256.55 2043 01087 46752
DATA PROCESSING SUPP/FEB 2043 02/26/94 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/10/94
•
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************4****************************************************** $256.55
R AMERICAN INSURANCE SERV GROUP 03409 705-400-1209-4201 00441 $500.00 52940183 08402 46753
ANNUAL SERVICE FEE/FY94 40183 02/22/94 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $500.00
R AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 00854 001-400-4101-4315 00189 $191.00 48765 05860 46754
DUES/M. SCHUBACH 48765 02/01/94 PLANNING /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $191.00
i
R AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 05628 001-400-4101-4315 00188 $231.00 53554 05861 46755
-� DUES/K. ROBERTSON 53554 02/01/94 PLANNING /MEMDERSHIP $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $231.00
R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED 00152 001-400-2101-4309 00692 $86.48 00017 46756
UTILITY RAGS/RUGS-FEB 94 02/28/94 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/14/94
-FINANCE-SFA340--
TIME 10: 55:52 .
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
* * *
R
R
R
R
R
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST .
FOR 03/14/94
----VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -
DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED
UTILITY RAGS/RUGS-FEB 94
ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED
UTILITY RAGS/RUGS-FEB 94
PAGE - 0004 --
DATE 03/14/94
1NV/REF PO * CHK
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00152 001-400-2201-4309 01592
02/28/94 FIRE
00152 001-400-3104-4309 01147
02/28/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY
ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED
UTILITY RAGS/RUGS-FEB 94
ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED
UTILITY RAGS/RUGS-FEB 94
$59. 60
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$9. 77
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00152 001-400-4204-4309 02807
02/28/94 BLDG MAINT
00152 001-400-4205-4309 00781
02/28/94
EQUIP SERVICE
ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED
UTILITY RAGS/RUGS-FEB 94
VENDOR TOTAL
R AT&T
00152
02/28/94
$218. 44
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$41. 95
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00017 46756
$0.00 03/14/94
00017 46756
$0.00 03/14/94
00017 46756
$0. 00 03/14/94
00017 •46756
$0.00 03/14/94
110-400-3302-4309 00944
PARKING EMF
$5. 12
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
******************************************************************** - $421.36
00017 46756
$0. 00 03/14/94
05179 001-400-2101-4304 01390 $13.30 732079-1389 01087 46757
PD FAX LONG DIST/FEB 94 -1389 02/25/94 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************'•.***************************************************** $13.30
R AURELI FLAG & BANNER
PENNANTS/FISHING PIER 21627
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
01497 001-400-6101-4309 01503 $108.25.
02/23/94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
* * *
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
KEYS/POLICE
R
AVIATION LOCK & KEY
KEYS/BLDG MAINT
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
NIGHT DEPOSIT REPAIR
VENDOR TOTAL
00407 001-400-2101-4309 00691
02/28/94 POLICE
$108. 25
$46. 55
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
21627 08060 46758
$108.25 03/14/94
00107 46759
$0.00 03/14/94
00407 001-400-4204-4311 00261
02/28/94 BLDG MAINT
$7. 31
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
00107 46759
$0. 00 03/14/94
00407 110-400-1204-4305 00089 $80.00
02/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
00107, 46759 ! .�
$0.00 03/14/94
********************************************************************
$133. 86
R BANNER SIGN 03814 001-400-4601-4305 01233 $92.01 17435 07999 46760
SAND N' STRAND BANNER 17433 03/07/94 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/10/94
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10: 55:52
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/94
PAGE.--- . 0005 --
DATE 03/14/94
----VND 44 - ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 44 AMOUNT INV/REF • PO 44 CHK 44
DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL +*********************+r*********************************************
$92. 01
BEACH CITIES CYCLES 05593 001-400-2101-5402 00130 $1,977.47 1925/1926 07771 46761
BICYCLES/ACCESSORIES/PD /1926 03/08/94 POLICE /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 $1.977.47 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,977.47
R BLUEPRINT SERVICE & SUPPLY CO. 03190 001-400-1208-4305 01345 $21.65 07841 '46762
03/10/94 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
REPLACE DAMAGED WARRANT
$0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $21.65
1
'I
.o
•
J
.
R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 00163 001-400-2101-4306 01516 $145.05 01010 46763
PRISONER.LAUNDRY/FED 94 02/28/94 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/10/94 ..i..►
J
* * *
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$14t. 05
R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 001-400-1208-4201 01111 $637.13 00005 46764
03/01/94 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/14/94 !o
L. I
R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 109-400-3301-4201 00237 $360.12. 00005 46764!.i
TRASH PICKUP/MARCH 94 03/01/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/14/94 i'',o
TRASH PICKUP/MARCH 94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $997.25
•
R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00525 33.685.39 00004 46765
DUMP CHARGES/FEB 94 02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/14/94
R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 105-400-2601-4201 00082 $440.32 00004 46765
• SPECIAL PICKUP/CITY YARD 02/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/14/94
•
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
34, 125. 71
R CALIFORNIA CHARTER/K-T SERV. , 05631 145-400-3409-4201 00109 $90.45 X53099 07998 46766
BUS/COMM RES TRIP 53099 03/01/94 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/14/94 I•
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL MFG. 05560
PROTECTIVE CLOTHES/PD /5229 03/02/94
$90. 45
001-400-2101-4306 01518 $166.24 4991/5229 07763 46767
POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 3167.57 03/14/94 I
•
•
1
U
•
•
•
FINANCE-5FA340
TIME 10:55:32
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/94
VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE ... 0006 --
DATE 03/14/94
'INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************nom**
$166.24
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00567 $493.06
WATER BILL/VALLEY PARK -4600 03/02/94 PARKS /UTILITIES'
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
08-59-20-4600 '07838 46768
$0.00 03/14/94
$493.06
R CARE STATION 03972 001-400-1203-4320 00501 $405.00
HEPATITIS "B" SHOTS 417-0 02/28/94 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $405.00
R CINTAS CORPORATION
UNIFORM RENTAL/FEB 94
00153 001-400-4202-4187 00258 $435.02
02/28/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
24417-0 01092 46769
$0.00 03/10/94
00002 46770
$0.00 03/14/94
R CINTAS CORPORATION
UNIFORM RENTAL/FEB 94
00153 110-400-3302-4187 00466 $21.00
02/28/94 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR
CHECKING ACCT INTEREST
R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR
LIAR CLAIMS/FEBRUARY 94
04928 705-300-0000-3401 00096
03/07/94
04928 705-400-1209-4201 00440
03/07/94 • LIABILITY INS
$456.02
$17. 50CR
/INTEREST INCOME
$12,613.50
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00002 46770
$0.00 03/14/94
08404 46771
$0.00 03/10/94
08404 46771 LI
$0.00 03/10/94 I!
R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR
LIAR CLAIMS/FEBRUARY 94
R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR
SETTLEMENT/DOHERTY
04928 705-400-1209-4324 00462
03/07/94 LIABILITY INS
04928 705-400-1209-4324 00463
03/07/94 LIABILITY INS
$1,110.23
/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
$96.10
/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
08404 46771
$0.00 03/10/94
08404 46771
$0.00 03/10/94
R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR
SETTLEMENT/FELBURG
*** VENDOR TOTAL
R COMTRADE
04928 705-400-1209-4324 00464 $750.00
03/07/94 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
******************************************************************** $14,552.33
08404 46771
$0.00 03/10/94
05512 001-400-1206-5402 00090 $17,753.00 9404352/3948 04074 46772
10 PC'S/NETWORK BID /3948 02/24/94 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 $17,753.00 03/14/94
•
41,
---FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:55:52
41111.
PAY VENDOR NAME _.._..—VND #---- • ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN it AMOUNT -------- INV/REF PO 41 CHK M
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST -
FOR 03/14/94
PAGE 0007----,
DATE 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL *+r ******* ********** r*****************air*************************** $17,753.00
R GARY*CULLEN 05627 001-210-0000-2110 05652 $1,600.00 66525 08308 46773 .1
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 66323 03/07/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE • $0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
SI, 600. 00
R L. N.*CURTIS & SON 00850 001-400-2201-4187 00387 $1,019.40 172836 06217 46774 �..
TURNOUTS/HAHN/SCOTT 72836 02/16/94 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL************************************.********************************
R D. I. A. I. R.
TUITION/K. MITCHELL
$1,005.91 03/10/94
$1,019.40
05629 001-400-2101-4312 02252 $50.00 08130 46775
03/03/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00
R THE*DAILY BREEZE 00642 001-400-1203-4201 01185 $162.50 01018 46776
EMPLOYEE ADS/FEB 94 02/28/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/F'RIVAT $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$162. 50
R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC . 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00502 $262.00 013125-0 01090 46777
EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL/FEB 94 125-0 03/02/94 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR 'TOTAL ********************************************************************
$262. 00
R DEL AMO MOTORS 00303 001-400-2101-4311 01811 $136.81 93004320 01086 46778
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/PD 04320 02/28/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $136.81
R DENN ENGINEERS 05094 001-400-4202-4305 00856 $37.95 4163 08091 46779
PARCEL/TRACT MAPS 4163 02/17/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $37.95
R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-2101-4305 02153 $37.65 01020 46780
FILM/POLICE DEPT 02/28/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/10/94
.I-
FINANCE-SFA340 -
TIME 10:55:52 '
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/94
-VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147
FILM DEVELOPING/FEB 94 02/28/94
INV/REF-
PAGE --- 0008
I,I
i•. -d
I'I
DATE 03/14/94
PO M
AMOUNT UNEI'!C
001-400-2101-4306 01517 $38.19
POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
* * *
R E & T CONSTRUCTORS
RETENTION/PD REMODEL
VENDOR TOTAL
$75. 84
CHK K
DATE EXP
01020 46780
$0.00 03/10/94
05386 170-400-8619-4201 00062
02/28/94 PD REMODEL III
$21,327.90
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$21,327.90
07791 ' 46781
$0.00 03/14/94
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
DISCOUNT OFFERED
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
DISCOUNT TAKEN
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FED 94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
00165 001-202-0000-2021 00599
02/28/94
00165 001-202-0000-2022 00592
02/28/94
$52. 67
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
$52. 67CR
/DISCOUNTS TAKEN
01027 46783
$0. 00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
00165 001-400-2101-4310 00449 $62.59
02/28/94 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
PARTS 00165 001-400-2101-4311 01810 $697.80
02/28/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
01027 46783
$0. 00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
00165 001-400-2201-4311 00500
02/28/94 FIRE
00165 001-400-2401-4311 00328
02/28/94 ANIMAL CONTROL
$4.21
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$15. 54
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
PARTS 00165 001-400-3103-4309 01633
02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94 .
R
00165
02/28/94
001-400-3103-4310 00184
ST MAINTENANCE
$65. 59
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$79. 50
/MOTOR FUELS AND LURES
01027 46783 •
$0.00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
00165 001-400-3103-4310 00185
02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE
00165 001-400-3103-4311 00972
02/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE
$15.42
/MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
$186. 01
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94 02/28/94
001-400-3104-4309 01146
TRAFFIC SAFETY
$14.86
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
1
I�
I; I✓
O
- - FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:55:52
PAY VENDOR NAME ---
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND -LIST
FOR 03/14/94
VND k --•--ACCOUNT NUMBER- TRN 4* -AMOUNT-.
DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE ---0009--
DATE 03/14/94
- INV/REF - PO li CHK k
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
00163 001-400-3104-4311 00148
02/28/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY
00165 001-400-4204-4311 00262
02/28/94 BLDG MAINT
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
s•
$17.44
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$259. 43
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0. 00 03/14/94
00165 001-400-4205-4309 00780
02/28/94 EQUIP SERVICE
00165 001-400-4205-4310 00284
02/28/94 EQUIP SERVICE
$556.19
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$15. 42CR
/MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FED 94
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
00165 . 001-400-4205-4311 00328
02/28/94 EOUIP SERVICE
.00165 001-400-6101-4309 01501
02/28/94 PARKS
01027 46783
$0. 00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
$121.53
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$41. 03
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
00165 001-400-6101-4311 00339
02/28/94 PARKS
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS' 00165
AUTO PARTS/FED 94 02/28/94
110-400-3302-4311 00944
PARKING ENF
$63. 18
/AUTCI MAINTENANCE
$315. 55
/AUTO MAINTENANCE '
01027 46783
$0. 00 03/14/94
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
• AUTO PARTS/FEB 94
•
00165 160-400-3102-4311 00232
02/28/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN
$80. 58
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,581.03
01027 46783
$0.00 03/14/94
R RON*FOX
REIMB MILES/STC TRAINING
01007 001-400-2101-4313 00470 $18.20
03/03/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18.20
08128 46784
$0.00 03/10/94
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
00015 001-400-1101-4304 00623
02/28/94 CITY COUNCIL
$6. 75
/TELEPHONE
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
00015 001-400-1131-4304 00525
02/28/94 CITY ATTORNEY
$18.32
/TELEPHONE
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
02/28/94
001-400-1131-4304 00526
CITY ATTORNEY
$9. 64
/TELEPHONE
01030 46786
$0. 00 03/14/94
I�
•1
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:53:32 '
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/94
- VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROD M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
00015 001-400-1132-4304 00028 $9.64
02/28/94 CITY PROSECUTOR /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-1141-4304 00718 $18.32
02/28/94 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE
PAGE --- 0010 -
DATE 03/14/94
INV/REF PO M CHK M
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00015 001-400-1201-4304 00778 $16.38
02/28/94 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-1202-4304 00774 $62.65
02/28/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-1203-4304 00786 $23.14
02/28/94 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-1206-4304 00709 $120.85
02/28/94 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 '46786
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
00015 001-400-1207-4304 00577
02/28/94 BUS LICENSE
$18.32
/TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-1208-4304 00342 $9.64
02/28/94 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE
01030 46786
2.0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
• R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
00015 001-400-2101-4304
02/28/94 POLICE
01391 $1,082.40
/TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-2201-4304 00592 $147.57
02/28/94 FIRE
/TELEPHONE
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
00015 001-400-2401-4304 00593 $27.20
02/28/94 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-4101-4304 00778 $46.27
02/28/94 PLANNING /TELEPHONE
01030 46786 -
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
00015 001-400-4201-4304 00701 $82.90
02/28/94 BUILDING /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-4202-4304 00846 $120.98
02/28/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
•
01030 46786 I ,
$0.00 03/14/94
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
00015 001-400-4204-4321 00764 $23.41
02/28/94 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
0
; i.$ >' Rte" �i w:hr��l .M!r � .11F �-$iar'r.�: ,i:.' �.
---FINANCE–SFA340
TIME 10: 55:52.
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/94
VND f - ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4i - - AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE ----- 0011—
DATE 03/14/94
---INV/REF PO 4i CHK 4t
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
lam.
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
00015 001-400-4601-4304 00891
$27. 96
02/28/94 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-6101-4304
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES 02/28/94 PARKS
00562 $9. 64
/TELEPHONE
01030
46786 I'
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
S
r.
y' 'I
e
* * *
00015 109-400-3301-4304 00090 $16.65
02/28/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/TELEPHONE
00015 110-400-1204-4304 00097 $56.88
02/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
DIRECT DIAL/PRIV LINES
01030 46786
$0.00 03/14/94
01030 '46786
$0.00 03/14/94
00015 110-400-3302-4304 00794 $109.89
02/28/94 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
VENDOR TOTAL * sir************* r**•x**nu*•ir**ar*****************trtratrr•ir*****************
$2,065.40
01030 46786
$0. 00 03/14/94
* * *
R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO.
STREET SWEEPER PARTS
VENDOR TOTAL
00731 001-400-3103-4311 00973 $4,619.45
03/02/94 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
******************************************************************** $4,619.45
08040 46787
$4,217.66 03/14/94
R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH
WORK COMP CLAIMS/MAR 94 '
R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH
WORK COMP CLAIMS/MAR 94
04075 705-400-1217-4182 00355
03/09/94 WORKERS COMP
04075 705-400-1217-4182 00356
03/03/94 WORKERS COMP
$10,814.49
/WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
$8,761.24
/WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
08405 46788
$0.00 03/10/94
08401 46788
$0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************nor***** ************* r $19,575.73
R HERMOSA CAR WASH
• CITY CAR WASHES/FEB 94
•
s
00065 001-400-2101-4311
30835 02/28/94 POLICE
R HERMOSA CAR WASH
CITY CAR WASHES/FEB 94
VENDOR TOTAL
01808 $227. 50
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
30835 01036 46789
$0.00 03/10/94
00065 001-400-4201-4311 00375 $5.00
30835 02/28/94 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
30835 01036 46789
$0. 00 03/10/94
******************************************************************** $232.50
R JUNG SOO*HWANG
CITE REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 01624
•
05633 110-300-0000-3302
03/07/94
57028 $90.00 6901624 06441 46790
/COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/10/94
. lb,
FINANCE-5FA340
TIME 10:50:52
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST - -PAGE -- -- 0012
FOR 03/14/94 DATE 03/14/94
PAY VgNOOR NAME----VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT - ` --INV/REF ' PO 6 CHK K
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************************•****************************************** $90. 00
* * *
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00984 $160.98 01037 46791
MISC ELECTRICAL SUPP/FEB 02/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0. 00 03/14/94
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 115-400-8144-4309 00038 $1,256.33 71049/71141 08071 46791
RELAYS/PARTS-STRAND PROJ 71141 02/25/94 STRAND WALL/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1,256.26 03/14/94
VENDOR TOTAL
********************************************************************
$1,437.31
R LA MIRADA THEATER 05302 .001-400-4601-4201 02176 $200.00 07995 46792
TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 03/07/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$200. 00
R LASSEN COLLEGE/NRA PROGRAM 04675 001-400-2101-4312 02248 $36.50 08127 46793
TUITION/J. GAINES 03/03/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE', POST $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $36.50
R LEARNED LUMBER
BUILDING SUPP/FEB 94
00167 001-400-4204-4309 02806 $154.21 01038 46794
02/28/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$154. 21
R LUKE*LOGAN 05632 110-300-0000-3302 57029 $20.00 005271 06440 46795
CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 05271 03/03/94 ./COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-202-0000-2021 00598 $1.41
DISCOUNT OFFERED 02/28/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-202-0000-2022 00591 $1.41CR
DISCOUNT OFFERED 02/28/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN
01040 46796
$0.00 03/10/94
01040 46796
$0.00 03/10/94
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00855 $69.06 01040 46796
DRAFTING SUPP/FEB 94 02/28/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/10/94
dr
Nua
—.FINANCE-SFA340 _.._
TIME 10:55:52.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND .LIST ----
FOR 03/14/94
PAGE--- - 0013
DATE 03/14/94
PAY VENDOR NAME -- VND # --.ACCOUNT NUMBER- TRN # - -.- • .. AMOUNT------INV/REF - - - PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL **********nor*************►****************************************** $69.06
R LOS ANGELES COUNTY 00879 001-400-4205-4251 00023 $172.00 P0003107T OB094 46797 :1
HAZ WASTE PERMIT FEES 3107T 02/28/94 EQUIP SERVICE /CONTRACT,SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 03/10/94
."I
*** VENDOR TOTAL******+r************************************************************* $172.00
I
R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00603 $541.25 256987 07792 '46798
MOTORCYCLE JACKET/GAINES 56987 01/28/94 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 03/10/94 '
R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 001-400-2201-4187 00388 $204.22 257123 01042 46798
RAINCOATS/FIRE DEPT 57123 02/23/94 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL***************************-**************************************** _ $745.47
R MAIN STREET TOURS 05630 001-400-4601-4201 02174 $200.00 07994 46799
BUS/COMM RES TRIP 03/03/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00
R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00163 $5,600.00 07800 46800
LEGAL SERV/FEB 94 03/07/94 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5,600.00
R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00264 $2,814.03 940244 08078 46801
UNLEADED GAS/CITY YARD 40244 03/07/94 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 03/14/94
R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00265 $745.93 940315 08077 46801
DIESEL FUEL/CITY YARD 40315 03/07/94 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,559.96
R KIM*MITCHELL 00522 001-400-2101-4312 02249 $24.00 08131 46802
MEALS/P.O.S.T CLASS 03/03/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$24.00
R NUGGET CONSTRUCTION 04476 001-210-0000-2110 05649 $400.00 26050 08313 46803
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 26050 03/07/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 03/10/94
1116
v
.-r -:'w- r. sem.
--FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:35:32
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND -LIST
FOR 03/14/94
DATE 03/14/94
03/14/94
PAY VENDOR NAME -------- VND * -------ACCOUNT NUMBER ` TRN * - - -AMOUNT - '—" 'INV/REF-"-- - - PO * CHK 4*
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $400.00
OFFICE DEPOT 04142 001-400-1207-4305 00328 $38.66 0125-613875-4 01085 46804
OFFICE SUPP/BUS LIC/FEB 873-4 02/28/94 BUS LICENSE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/10/94
R OFFICE DEPOT 04142 001-400-1208-4305 01346 $822.08 0125-613875-4 01085 46804
OFFICE SUPP/STOCK-FED 94 875-4 02/28/94 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$860.74
R OVERBYTE COMPUTERS 04739 001-400-1206-4201 01253 $48.71 84042 04081 46805
BLANK DATA TAPES 84042 02/02/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $48.71' 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - $48.71
* * *
R OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVICE 05107 001-400-4101-4201 00223 $450.00 . 01064 46806
300' NOTICING/3-3-94 • 03/03/94 PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 50.00 03/10/94
VENDOR TOTAL
********************************************************************
$450.00
R PEP BOYS 00608 001-400-2201-4311 00499 535.69 2076255 01056 46807
AUTO PARTS/FIRE DEPT 76255 03/04/94 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $35.69
a
R PERFORMING TREE, INC. 00600 001-400-4601-4201 02175 $755.00 184 07997 46808
COMM RES CHILDREN'S SHOW 184 03/07/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/14/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $755.00
R PMW ASSOCIATES 01183 001-400-2101-4312 02230 $251.00 08126 46809
TUITION/V. STRASER 03/03/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $251.00
R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS 02526 001-400-2101-4311 01809 $140.00 01057 46810
PAINT K-9 ON PATROL CAR 03/07/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/10/94
•
•
• ---FINANCE-SFA340- -
TIME 10:55:52.
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/94
VND ## -- ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 1# - AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE------ 0015 -
DATE 03/14/94
--INV/REF • - • PO # CHK k
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R REGENTS OF UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
TUITION/CARUSO/SPRING 94
$140.00
02456 001-400-2101-4201 01459 $335.00
03/07/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
07794 46811
$0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R SYLVIA*ROOT
MINUTES SEC/3-1-94
$335. 00
04061 001-400-4102-4201 00452 $152.00 301 05859
46812
301 03/04/94 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/10/94
R SYLVIA*ROOT 04061 109-400-3301-4201 00235 $136.75
MINUTES SEC/3-2-94 302 03/07/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $288.75
302 08093
$0. 00
46812
03/10/94
R . ROTO -ROOTER
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND
R ROTO -ROOTER
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND •
05385 001-210-0000-2110 05650 $1,600.00-
66531 03/07/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
05385 001-210-0000-2110 05651 $1,600.00
66527 03/07/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
66531 08311
$0. 00
66527 08310
$0. 00
46813
03/10/94
46813
03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
•
R ROYAL SAFARI
BUS/COMM RES ADULT TRIP
$3,200.00
05074 145-400-3409-4201 00110 $288.60
03/10/94 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
• ,
08506 46814
$0.00 03/14/94 1: -
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $288.60
R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC ENGRG SERV/JAN94 94002
01578 001-400-3104-4201 00179 $1,230.00
02/01/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
94002 08099 46815
$0.00 03/10/94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$1,230.00
R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2401-4309 00213
ANIMAL CONTROL SUPPLIES 15447 I 02/21/94 ANIMAL CONTROL
* * *
$52. 53 5215447
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01062
$0. 00
46816
03/10/94 1 --
VENDOR
•' -
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R SOUTH DAY HOSPITAL
DISCOUNT OFFERED
$52. 53
00107 001-202-0000-2021 00597 $76.30 07798 46817
03/03/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED.
$0.00 03/10/94 l',""
F.*
-''--pIwAwcs-sFA340
TIME 10:33:52
CITY OF ysnmoo« BEACH
DEMAND -LIST
FOR 03/14/94.
PAGE ---- 0016 -'-
DATE
ToArs o3/14/94
PAY VENDOR NAME -'--vwo 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0' - .wnouwr-- INV/REF PO 0 CHK 0
os5cnzprImv DATE Iwvo rnou ~ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP .
• ----.-
' ----$0.00
/
R sour* BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001 -202-0000-2022 000vo $76oocn 07798 4ao17.
' • DISCOUNT TAKEN 03/03/94 /DISCOUNTS
� �nu oa/�o/po
R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 01*5e '' /
�,��o .. -- '- - - �
..' BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTS 03/03/94 POLICE /CONTRACT�y�/v�cc/pn�w^r 07798 46817
03/10/94�ae��[�| '
'.
°°° VENDOR TOTAL *°*°*°*********°*******v°********°****°°°**°*°*°°°*°°**�°*°°*******° *��� ro |!
'� ''
^r..: ' R opsczALrv=m^IwrswAmcg CO 3001 om11n_�_ 109-400-3301-4201 00236 $o.�oo�oo --'o' � 00027 oae�o�
SWEEPING
~
! °** VENDOR TOTAL *°*°*********************v********°************°****°*°***
*********� *�.zno�oo "|
•
i
- -_-- -•
n vAL°ornAosn
n���s/p o e r CLASS «»opv001-400-2101-4312 02231 *24.00 ' 08125 46819
,� �03,03/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 03/10/94 ^'r
°*° VENDOR TOTAL *°°°
n
SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 00425 001-400-2201-4309 01591 $27.00 100116 01071 46820
OXYGEN TANK REFILL 00116 03/01/94 FIRE�~
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/10/94 /`/
**° VENDOR TOTAL **°°**°*°°***°**°°********°*****
***°°**°***°°****v°*****°°**°w*°*°*v woruh
• TAK'S LAWNMOWER SALES & SERV. • 00169 001 -*00-6101-4309 01500 $142 .73 3510/3511 01072 46821
GARDEN TOOLS/PUB WORKS /3511 02/28,94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0 .00 03/14/94 1:1./
°°° VENDOR. TOTAL °°°°°°°°°°°°°*°°*°°°°°°°v°°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°°°°°*°°°°*°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°w* *142.73 `!
.
.^
_ - ,
R J. E.*TALLERICO o�o«� no�-«no-x�o�-000� 01252 *u��oo 377 04080 46822 .��
COMP LIC
°v°
VENDOR TOTAL
-_--
n TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001 -202-0000-2021 00600 $78 .83 01075 46823
DISCOUNT OFFERED 02/2e/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED *o.00 03/14/94 ..'�
'
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2022 00593 $78aocn 01075 46823 '
DISCOUNT TAKEN 02/28/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN *o.00 03/1*/9* �
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 10:55:52
•
PAY VENDOR NAME -
DESCRIPTION
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
HARDWARE SUPP/FEB 94
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
HARDWARE SUPP/FEB 94
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017-11.
FOR 03/14/94. DATE 03/14/94 1.-t
-.VND *--- --ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT------INV/REF--. - PO St CH 0 - :
•
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00123 001-400-2101-4309 00693
02/28/94 POLICE
$31. 04
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
._. • . .
•
01075 46823
$0. 00 03/14/94
00123 001-400-3101-4309 00213 $14.31 01075 46823
02/28/94 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/14/94
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123
HARDWARE SUPP/FED 94 02/28/94
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123
STEEL TRASH CANS/PUB WKS 38597 . 02/24/94
001-400-3103-4309 01634
ST MAINTENANCE
001-400-3103-4309 01635
ST MAINTENANCE
$43. 55 01075 46823
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/14/94
- - - - - -
$307.08 38597 08059 46823
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $307.08 03/14/94
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
HARDWARE SUPP/FEB 94
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE.
HARDWARE SUPP/FEB 94
00123 001-400-3404-4309 01148
02/28/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY
00123 001-400-4204-4309 02808
02/28/94 BLDG MAINT
$72. 70 01075
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$407. 66
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
46823
•
•
$0. 00 03/14/94 .2.
01075 46823 •
$0.00 03/14/94 "
R. TRIANGLE HARDWARE
HARDWARE SUPPIFEB 94
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
HARDWARE SUPP/FEB 94
00123 001-400-6101-4309 01502 $16.68
02/28/94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00123 105-400-2601-4309 00985 $67.82
02/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
HARDWARE SUPP/FEB 94
- •
00123 160-400-3102-4309 00872 $35.48
02/28/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $1, 016. 52
01075 46823
03/14/94
$0. 00
01075 46823
$0.00 03/14/94
01075 46823
$0.00 03/14/94 :Is
R STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 001-400-1213-4180 00763 $2,862.00
ADV PENSION PMT/MAR 94 . 03/07/94 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT
. 07196 46824
$0.00 03/14/94 '
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************* ********* *********** ***** ***** *****************
$2, 862. 00
*** PAY CODE TOTAL ***************** ******************************************* ******
: *** TOTAL WARRANTS
• .;
;
1
•
$126, 704. 75
$542, 704. 69
• .
•
: .
I HEREBYTERTIFYTHATTHEDEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY -
THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES _1_3'0 11 INCLUSIVE, OF THE. ; ..
WARRANT REGISTER FOR. .. ..*14/1 ARE ACCURATE,
FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE
TO THE IGET. 4644)
1.'
BY
DATE
FINANCE DIRECTOR
March 14, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
March 22, 1994
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
March 29, 1994, TUESDAY, 7:OOPM
JOINT MEETING OF COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION
April 12, 1994
Request for Kiwanis holiday tree lot at
Community Center
Community Resources Director
Return of bid on parking enforcement vehicles Police Chief
Public Hearing: Cable Television Franchise
Renewal - MultiVision Cable
Admission Charges - AVP
Friday Festival: Chamber of Commerce
Woman's Professional Volleyball Association
Tournament - June 11-12 Community Resources Director
Report on seismic upgrade of unreinforced
masonry buildings Building/Planning Director
April 26, 1994
Community Resources Director
Community Resources Director
Community Resources Director
Special study of zoning ordinance and
enforcement ordinance re: parking in front
yard setback
City telephone system
May 10, 1994
Adopt Cable Operator Ordinance
MultiVision Franchise Renewal
Planning Director
Police Chief
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Report on Community Development Block Grants City Manager
(oveR)
1 c
May 24, 1994
June 14, 1994
Storm drain/sewer tie-in Public Works Director
June 28, 1994
July 12, 1994
2nd Quarter General Plan Amendments:
Air Quality Element Planning Director
UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED
Initiated by:
Council Alternatives for funding underground
utilities Public Works Director
Council Emergency generator capability in local
grocery stores with incentive program to
be provided
Police Chief
Council Revision of HBMC provisions pertaining to
construction of public street improvements
(Public Hearing) Public Works Director
Staff County Safe Neighborhood Park Act
(Grant -Prop A) application for municipal pier
renovation Assistant City Manager
Chamber Farmer's Market: Move to Pier Avenue Chamber of Commerce
Council Bring back Ordinance on Fire Flow condition
and consider revision or abolishment of Fire
Flow Fee. Public Works Director
Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC
entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Director
Caltrans utility maintenance agreement Public Works Director
March 9, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS
February 1994
Attached are the February revenue and expenditure reports;
General Fund revenue is 58.4 % received for 66% of the fiscal
year. Adjusting for property taxes, Prop A funds and lot sale
proceeds to be received, revenue would be 63% received. Parking
Fund revenue is 61.5% received. Parking permit renewals will
increase the percentage of revenue received in the next few
months. Midyear Budget revisions approved 2/22/94 are included
in these reports.
General Fund expenditures are below budget at 62.2% for 66% of
the fiscal year; Parking Fund expenditures are 63.3%.
CONCUR:
Stephen R,V Barrell, Viki Copeland,
City Man ger
i
Finance Director
1d(,)
FINANCE-FA484
'TIME 09:48:22
FUND
OBJ DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101
3102
3103
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
OBJECT
SUBTOTAL
3200 LICENSES AND
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3209
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
/CURRENT YEAR SECURED
/CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED
/PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS
/SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL 513813
/TRANSFER TAX
/SALES TAX
/1/2 CENT'SALES TX EXT
/CABLE TV FRANCHISE
/ELECTRIC FRANCHISE
/GAS FRANCHISE
/REFUSE FRANCHISE
/TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY
/BUSINESS LICENSE
PERMITS
/DOG LICENSES
/BICYCLE LICENSES
/BUILDING PERMITS
/ELECTRIC PERMITS
/PLUMBING PERMITS
/OCCUPANCY PERMITS
/GARAGE SALES
/BANNER PERMITS
/ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS
/ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE
/AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT
/TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT
/SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT
/OPEN FIRE PERMIT
/AUTO REPAIR PERMIT
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3301 /MUNICIPAL COURT FINES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401
3402
3403
3404
/INTEREST INCOME
/RENTS & CONCESSIONS
/PIER REVENUE
/COMM CTR LEASES
EST REV
2, 845. 072. 00
203, 417. 00
215. 494. 00
45. 748. 00
47, 000. 00
1, 420, 253. 00
118, 874. 00
-146, 000. 00
44, 710. 00
33, 041. 00
157. 000. 00
232. 14B. 00
510, 000. 00
6, 01G,-757'. 00
MONTHLY REV
YEAR TO DATE
PAGE 0001
DATE 03/14/94
66.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
51, 562. 04 1, 520, 171. 84 1, 324. 900. 16
0. 00 183, 792. 30 19, 624. 70
57, 523. 41 140, 505. 93 74, 988. 07
1, 521. 07 28, 921. 70 16, 826. 30
3, 175. 19 26. 388. 20 20. 611. 80
127. 800. 00 829, 826. 53 590, 426. 47
0. 00 28, 433. 01 90, 440. 99
39, 629. 51 115, 136. 99 30, 863. 01
0. 00 0. 00 44. 710. 00
0. 00 0. 00 33, 041.00
6, 708. 33 84, 098. 53 72, 901. 47
27, 830. 14 128, 137. 27 104, 010. 73
47, 184. 05 - 297, 586. 45 212. 413. 55
362, 933. 74 • 3. 382; 99B. 75 . 2, 635, 758. 25 •
15. 300. 00 231.65 12, 098. 90
200. 00 6. 50 97. 50
69, 000. 00 2, 045. 87 39. 073. 37
19, 000. 00 1, 249. 00 10, 345. 55
13, 000. 00 390. 55 7. 298. 34
10. 000. 00 1, 049. 00 6, 649. 00
250. 00 9. 90 82. 50
2, 566. 00 0. 00 1, 361. 75
300. 00 0. 00 10B. 50
3, 500. 00 321. 75 21228. 00
2, 400. 00 114. 00 1, 413. 00
1, 300. 00 0. 00 715. 00
146. 00 0. 00 0. 00
45. 00 0. 00 46. 75
556. 00 0. 00 0. 00
137, 563. 00 5,418. 22 81. 518. 16
110, 000. 00 6, 807. 42 58, 788. 76
110, 000. 00 6, 807. 42 58, 788. 76
111, 560. 00 0. 00 70, 005. 49
4, 000. 00 231. 00 2, 190. 06
10. 500. 00 443. 10 7. 744. 88
117, 000. 00 9, 647. 00 77, 936. 00
3,201.10
102. 50
29, 926. 63
8,654.45
5.701.66
3,351.00
167. 50
1,204.25
191. 50
1.272.00
987. 00
585. 00
146. 00
1. 75-
556. 00
56. 044. 84
51. 211.24
51, 211. 24
41. 554. 51
1,809.94
2,755.12
39, 064. 00
53. 4
90. 3
65. 2
63. 2
56. 1
58. 4
23. 9
78. B
0. 0
0. 0
53. 5
55. 1
58. 3
56. 2
79. 0
4B. 7
56. 6
54. 4
56. 1
66. 4
33. 0
53. 0
36. 1
63. 6
58. 8
55. 0
0. 0
103. 8
0. 0
59. 2
53. 4
53. 4
62. 7
54. 7
73. 7
66.6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
•
41.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 41
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
TIME 09:46:22 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
FUND
OBJ DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF
3405
3406
3411
3412
3414
3418
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
MONEY & PROPERTY
/COMM CTR RENTALS
/COMM CTR THEATRE
/OTHER FACILITIES
/TENNIS COURTS
/PROP A CONVERSION
/SPECIAL EVENTS
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3504
3505
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY
/IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE
/HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE
/MANDATED COSTS
/HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE
/POST
/STC -SVC OFF TRAINING
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3801 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION
3802 /SIGN REVIEW
3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
3805 /CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND
3806 /BOARD OF APPEALS
3808 /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW
3810 /FINAL MAP REVIEW
3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW
3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES
3814 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL
3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES
3818 /POLICE SERVICES
3819 /JAIL SERVICES
3821 /FINGERPRINT SERVICE
3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY
3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES
3825 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING
3827 /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT
3831 /STREET CUT INSPECTION
3834 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
3836 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE
3837 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE
3838 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO
EST REV
52, 000. 00
22, 000. 00
23, 000. 00
14, 000. 00
90, 000. 00
30, 000. 00
474, 060. 00
300. 00
762, 757. 00
9, 300. 00
46, 143. 00
61, 300. 00
6, 000. 00
4, 675. 00
890, 475. 00
10, 000. 00
4, 100. 00
4, 800. 00
2, 776. 00
300. 00
1, 003. 00
488. 00
3, 905. 00
45, 000. 00
702. 00
14, 500. 00
18, 230. 00
2, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
250. 00
63. 00
5, 703. 00
18, 524. 00
15, 000. 00
10, 519. 00
1, 500. 00
500. 00
MONTHLY REV
3, 779. 00
692. 00
1, 581. 00
1, 327. 75
0. 00
1,217.00
18, 917. 85
0. 00
155, 364. 17
0. 00
6, 348. 00
0. 00
310. 02
0. 00
162, 022. 19
826. 50
206. 00
0. 00
347. 00
0. 00
0. 00
244. 00
• 0. 00
1, 543. 09
0. 00
561. 00
1, 089. 90
0. 00
299. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
943. 50
2, 655. 10
656. 00
80. 00
4. 50
YEAR TO DATE
34, 209. 50
5, 701. 00
11, 754. 75
8, 917. 00
0. 00
19, 740. 85
238, 199. 53
304. 20
499, 855. 26
0. 00
46, 143. 00
32, 693. 42
2, 679. 76
2, 540. 52
584, 216. 16
6, 831. 50
2, 320. 50
1, 920. 00
1, 388. 00
325. 50
0. 00
244. 00
1, 952. 25
26, 595. 14
525. 50
8, 124. 68
10, 509. 25
1, 084. 00
3, 244. 50
11, 770. 96
24. 00
47. 25
2, 851. 50
4, 620. 20
9, 507. 15
8, 042. 50
1, 060. 00
176. 85
PAGE 0002
DATE 03/14/94
66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
17, 790. 50
16, 299. 00
11, 245. 25
5, 083. 00
90, 000. 00
10, 259. 15
235, 860. 47
4. 20-
262, 901. 74
9, 300. 00
0. 00
28, 606. 58
3, 320. 24
2, 134. 48
306, 258. 84
3, 168. 50
1 , 779. 50
2, 880. 00
1, 388. 00
25. 50-
1, 003. 00
• 244. 00
1, 952. 75
18, 404. 86
176. 50
6, 375. 32
7, 720. 75
916. 00
1, 755. 50
3, 229. 04
226. 00
15. 75
2, 851. 50
13, 903. 80
5, 492. 85
2, 476. 50
440. 00
323. 15
65. 7
25. 9
51. 1
63. 6
0. 0
65. 8
50. 2
101. 4
65. 5
0. 0
100. 0
53. 3
44. 6
54. 3
65. 6
68. 3
56. 5
40. 0
50. 0
108. 5
0. 0
50. 0
49. 9
59. 1
74. 8
56. 0
57. 6
54. 2
64. 8
78. 4
9. 6
75. 0
50. 0
24. 9
63. 3
76. 4
70. 6
35. 3
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
K]---FINANCE,,FA484- ----
TIME 09:48:22
FUND
OBJ DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3800 CURRENT SERVICE
3839
3840
3841
3857
3858.
3859
3861
3862
3863
3866
3867
3868
3869
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3883
3890
3893
3894
3895
3896
3898
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3901
3902
3903
3904
3909
3916
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/20/94
CHARGES
/PHOTOCOPY CHARGES
/AMBULANCE TRANSPORT
/POLICE TOWING
/PKG PLAN APPLICATION
/TENANT REFUSE BILLING
/REFUSE LIEN FEE
/HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT
/ALARM PERMIT FEE
/FALSE ALARM FEE
/NONCONFORMING REMODELS
/PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS
/PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT
/2ND PARTY RESPONSE
/PARAMEDIC RESP/NON-TRSP
/LOCK -OUT (CAR)
/LOCK -OUT (HOUSE)
/FLOODING WATER REMOVAL
/SPRAY BOOTH INSPECTION
/FIRE PROTECT/SYS EXISTG
/SPRINKLER CERT TEST
/COMML BLDG/APT INSPECT
/FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION
/300'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES
/OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS
/ANIMAL TRAP FEE
/MAILING FEE
/HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION
/SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP
/REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR
/CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT
/GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS
/LATE FEE
/DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
TOTALS
EST REV
1, 000. 00
5, 425. 00
40, 000. 00
4, 990. 00
150. 00
1, 000. 00
3, 037. 00
2, 500. 00
1, 100. 00
3, 634. 00
1, 242. 00
5, 896. 00
200. 00
10, 045. 00
130. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
380. 00
1, 220. 00
416. 00
99, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
530. 00
0. 00
0. 00
386, 758:00
66, 000. 00
1, 733. 00
3, 320. 00
1, 000. 00
10. 00
21, 000. 00
2, 076, 763. 00
2, 169, 826. 00
10, 187, 439. 00
MONTHLY REV
126. 76
1, 562. 17
3, 040. 00
0. 00
10. 75
1, 367. 59-
0. 00
324. 00
434. 00
0. 00
0. 00
737. 00
0. 00
1, 427. 46
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
13, 940. 88
280. 00
29. 40
0. 00
347. 00
30, 347. 42
0. 00
0. 00
204. 00
12, 774. 47
0. 00
0. 00
156, 662. 66
169, 641..13
756, 087. 97
YEAR TO DATE
723. 02
5, 748. 77
24, 786. 00
1, 996. 00
161. 25
10, 838. 48
0. 00
1, 427. 00
868. 30
2, 180. 25
0. 00
4, 186. 50
277. 78
5, 171. 02
'65. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
. 0. 00
189. 75
976. 00
312. 00
56, 343. 38
5, 669. 65
263. 00
15. 00
347. 00
225, 710. 38
4, 526. 00
1, 733. 20
2, 024. 04
12, 665. 21
6. 31
0.00
1, 365, 112. 28
1, 386, 067. 04
5, 957, 498. 78
PAGE 0003
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
276. 98
323. 77-
15, 214. 00
2, 994. 00
11. 25-
9, 838. 48-
3, 037. 00
1, 073. 00
231. 70
1, 453. 75
1, 242. 00
1, 709. 50
77. 78-
4, 873. 98
65. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
190. 25
244. 00
104. 00
42, 656. 62
19, 330. 35
267. 00
15. 00-
347. 00-
161, 047. 62
61, 474. 00
O. 20-
1, 295. 96
11, 665. 21-
3. 69
21, 000. 00
711, 650. 72
783, 758. 96
4, 229, 940. 22
72. 3
105. 9
61. 9
40. 0
107. 5
1083. 8
0. 0
57. 0
78. 9
59. 9
0. 0
71. 0
138. 8
51. 4
50. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
49. 9
80. 0
75. 0
56. 9
22. 6
49. 6
0. 0
0. 0
58. 3
6. 8
100. 0
60. 9
1266. 5
63. 1
0. 0
65. 7
63. 8
58. 4
•
••
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
s..
j,
a,
..,i
a
a
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0004
TIME 09:48:22 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
001 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3900 OTHER REVENUE
FUND TOTAL 10. 187, 439. 00 756, 087. 97 5, 957, 498. 78 4, 229, 940. 22 58. 4
•
•`
•
•
•
•
•
•
. •
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0005
TIME 09:48:22 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
•
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
•
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
• DEPARTMENT 0000
S..
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
S
•
I
p
p
3100 TAXES
3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 183,000.00
3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3,300.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 186,300.00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 65,333.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 65,333.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 251,633.00
FUND TOTAL 251, 633.00
12, 238. 04 103, 443. 47
969.22 23, 986. 41
13, 207. 26 127, 429. 88
0. 00 31, 641. 05
0. 00 31, 641. 05
13, 207. 26 159, 070. 93
13, 207. 26 159, 070. 93
79, 556. 53
20,686.41-
58,870.12
0,686.41-
58,870.12
33, 691. 95
33, 691. 95
92, 562.07
56. 5
726. 8
68. 4
48. 4
48. 4
63. 2
92, 562. 07 63. 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
F I NANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0006
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
109 -DOWNTOWN --ENHANCEMENT FUND -
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 20, 831.00 0. 00 9, 920. 82 10, 910. 18
3407 /PARKING -LOT --RENTAL------------ 17, 325.-00 -- -- 1, 437. 56 11, 502. 24 5, 822. 76
3413 PARKING LOT LEASE 180, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 120, 000. 00 60, 000. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 218, 156. 00 16, 437. 56 141, 423. 06 76, 732. 94
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 218, 156. 00 16, 437. 36 141, 423. 06 76, 732. 94
FUND TOTAL 218, 156. 00 16, 437. 56 141, 423. 06 76. 732. 94
47. 6
66. 3
66. 6
64. 8
64. 8
64. 8
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
41 . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007
• TIME 09:48:22 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
41
110 PARKING FUND
• DEPARTMENT 0000
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
• 3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING 949, 930.00 76, 522.01 650, 540.89 299. 389. 11 68.4
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 949, 930.00 76, 522.01 650, 540.89 299, 389. 11 68.4
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3,202.00 0.00 2,705.40 496.60 84.4
. 3407 /PARKING LOT RENTAL 0.00 400.00 3,200.00 3,200.00- 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3,202.00 400. 00 5,905.40 2,703.40- 184. 4
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
110 3842 ' /PARKING METERS 700, 000.00 50, 244.91 436, 704.31 263, 295.69 62.3
3843 /PARKING PERMITS: ANNUAL 215, 000.00 38, 133.00 57, 384.70 157, 615.30 26.6
3844 /DAILY.PARKING PERMITS 1,000.00 0.00 427.50 572.50 42.7
3848 /DRIVEWAY PERMITS 700. 00 35. 75 207. 30 492. 70 29. 6
3849 /GUEST PERMITS 1,200.00 27.50 837.10 362.90 69.7
3850 /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 2,200.00 130.50 913.50 1,286.50 41.5
110 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 920, 100.00 88, 571.66 496, 474.41 423, 625.59 53.9
ID 3901
OTHER REVENUE
3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 1,000.00 0.00 1,315.00 315.00- 131.5
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,000.00 0.00 1,315.00 315.00- 131.5
1 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 874, 232.00 165, 493.67 1, 154, 235.70 719, 996.30 61.5
r
1
r
r
1 •
r •
H41
FUND TOTAL 1,874,232.00 165, 493.67 1,154,235.70 719, 996.30 61.5
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
•TIME 09:48:22
• FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
• DEPARTMENT 0000
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
+ .�
!‘I
• ?I
•
•
•
0
0
3400 USE OF MONEY )x PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
34, 540. 00
34, 540. 00
0. 00 ' 18, 384. 92
0. 00 18, 384. 92
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 74, 690.00 4,268.72
3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 149,068.00 9,403.63
3503 /SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 0.00
3512 /SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 88.517.00 5,711.14
3522 /TDA ARTICLE 3/LOCAL 5,196.00 0. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 321, 471.00 19, 385.49
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 356, 011.00 19, 385.49
FUND TOTAL 356, 011.00 19, 385.49
43, 482. 96
87, 386. 68
4,000.00
56, 266. 74
0.00
191, 136. 38
209, 521. 30
209. 521. 30
16, 155. 08 53. 2
16, 155. 08 53. 2
31, 207. 04 58. 2
61, 681. 32 58. 6
0. 00 100. 0
32, 250. 26 63. 5
5, 196. 00 0. 0
130, 334. 62 59. 4
146, 489. 70 58. 8
146, 489. 70 58. 8
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•,
•
•
•n.
IS:
• ,.I
• '
•
•
•
•
'FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
---120-COUNTY GAS TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000 -
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT -SUBTOTAL-
Is:
UBTOTAL-
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.070 OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
423. 00
423.00 -
0. 00
0. 00
206. 83
206. 83
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3601 /COUNTY AID TO CITIES 28, 720. 00 0. 00 0. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 28.720.00 0.00 0.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 29, 143. 00 0. 00 206. 83
FUND TOTAL 29, 143. 00
0.00 - 206.83
216. 17 48. 8
216. 17 48. 8 •
28, 720. 00 0. 0
28, 720. 00 0. 0
28, 936. 17 0. 7
28, 936. 17 0. 7
O
•
•
•
0
• •
•
• •
•
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
-123 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 13, 112.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13, 112.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3910
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
FUND TOTAL
/PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU
TOTALS
0. 00
0. 00
13, 112. 00
13, 112.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
6, 650. 03
6, 650. 03
0. 00
0. 00
6, 650. 03
6, 650. 03
6, 461. 97 50. 7
6, 461. 97 50. 7
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
6, 461.97 50. 7
6, 461. 97 50. 7
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
• •
• •
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
/--FINANCE-FA4B4 ----
•(2 TIME 09:48:22
3
•
5
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
6-UUT-RAIi_ROAD--RIGHT--OF-WAY--FUND-------
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
S
0
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
EST REV
3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 955, 418.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 955,418.00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 52,698.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 52, 698. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 008, 116.00
FUND TOTAL 1,008,116.00
MONTHLY REV
YEAR TO DATE
74, 885. 83 627, 854. 15
74, 885. 83 627, 854. 15
7,575.21 34, 945. 33
7,575.21 34, 945. 33
82, 461. 04 662, 799. 48
82, 461.04 662, 799. 48
PAGE 0011
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE 7.
327, 563. 85 65. 7
327, 563- 85 65. 7
17, 752.67 66.3
17, 752.67 66.3
345, 316. 52 65. 7
345, 316. 52 65. 7
•
•
®
a
•
S
•
S
•
.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
,FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
FUND
OBJ DESCRIPTION
127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0012
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3100 TAXES
3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 1, 433, 127.00 112, 328.74 941, 781.37 491, 345.63 65.7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL . . -•.. -. -...---1,433,127.00 112. 328.74 941, 781.37 491, 345.63 65.7
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 19, 885.00 0.00 9,598.73 10.286.27 48.2
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 885.00 0.00 9,598.73 10, 286.27 46.2
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1,453,012.00 112,328.74 951, 380.10 501,631.90 65.4
FUND TOTAL 1, 453, 012.00
112,328.74 951,380.10
501, 631.90 65.4
•
•
•
0
•
O.
•1.
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
'FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013
TIME 09:48:22 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
.145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
• DEPARTMENT 0000
•
•
•
•
•
a
•
•
•
•
3100 TAXES
3117
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/PROPOSITION A TRANSIT
165, 885. 00
165, 885. 00
8,281.18
8, 281. 18
118, 113.94
118, 113.94
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 6,619.00 0.00 3,034.81
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6,619.00 0.00 3,034.81
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3855 /BUS PASSES 3,000.00 266.00 2,500.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5,000.00 266. 00 2,500.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0.00 0.00 40.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 0.00 0.00 40. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 177, 504. 00 8,547.18 123, 688. 75
FUND TOTAL 177, 504. 00 8,547.18 123,688.'75
47, 771. 06
47, 771. 06
3, 584. 19
3, 584. 19
2, 500. 00
2, 500. 00
40. 00-
40. 00-
53,815.25
0-
53,815.25
71. 2
71. 2
45. 8
45. 8
50. 0
50. 0
0. 0
0. 0
69. 6
53, 815.25 69.6
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
• •
•
S
S
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
146 PROPOSITION 'C TRANSIT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0014
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3100 TAXES
3118 /PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS 136, 226.00 10, 284.00 71, 847.00
3121 /SUBREGNL. IN • 26, 958. 00 0. 00 13, 671. 77
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 163, 184.00 10, 284.00 85, 518.77
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 7,573.00 0.00 3,756.66
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7,573.00 0. 00 3,756.66
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3854 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 13, 800.00 5,563.70 5,670.65
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13, 800. 00 5,563.70 5,670'.65
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 184, 557.00 15, 847. 70 94, 946. 08
FUND TOTAL 184, 557. 00 15, 847. 70 94, 946.08
64, 379. 00 52. 7
13, 286. 23 50.7
77, 665. 23 52.4
3,816.34 49.6
3,816.34 49.6
8, 129. 35 41. 0
8, 129. 35 41. 0
89, 610.92 51.4
89, 610. 92 51. 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•,
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7.
150 GRANT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3539 /FORESTRY GRANT 8CA27539 17, 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 600. 00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 600. 00 0. 0
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 17, 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 600. 00 0. 0
•
•
•
•
•'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FUND TOTAL 17, 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 600. 00 0. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•;
•
•
•
--FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
132 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUNDI PAGE 0016
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
• 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1,095.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,095.00
• 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3538 /AQMD EMISSION CTL AB276 18,800.00
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 18, 800.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
• 3956 /RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00
• DEPT 0000 TOTALS 19,895.00
• FUND TOTAL 19, 895.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
479. 75
479. 75
10, 310. 95
10, 310. 95
0. 00
0. 00
10, 790. 70
10, 790. 70
615.25 43.8
615.25 43.8
8, 489. 05 54. 8
8, 489. 05 54. 8
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
9,104.30 54.2
9, 104. 30 54. 2
ID
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
'FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
• FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
• DEPARTMENT 0000
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) PAGE 0017
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3100 TAXES
3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 54,843.00
3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 1,500.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 36, 343. 00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 2,797.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,797.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 59, 140. 00
FUND TOTAL 59,140.00
2, 668. 19
210. 28
2, 878. 47
0. 00
0. 00
2, 878. 47
2, 878. 47
30, 018. 99
2, 709. 61
32, 728. 60
1, 260. 28
1, 260. 28
33, 988. 88
33, 988. 88
•
24, 824.01 54.7
1,209.61- 180. 6
23, 614.40 58.0
1,536.72 45.0
1,536.72 45. 0
25, 151. 12 57. 4
25, 151. 12 57. 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
• FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
160 SEWER FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7.
158, 162. 00
158, 162. 00
0. 00
0.00
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 8,000.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6,000.00 0.00
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 500.00 0.00
3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 645.25 0.00
3832 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 826.00 157.25
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,971.25 157.25
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 800, 000.00 66, 666.67
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 800, 000. 00 66, 666. 67
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 968, 133. 25 66, 823. 92
FUND TOTAL 968, 133. 25 66, 823. 92
76, 205. 54
76, 205. 54
673. 76
673. 76
0. 00
162. 75
157. 25
320. 00
533, 333. 36
533, 333. 36
610, 532. 66
610, 532. 66
81,956.46
81,956.46
7,326.24
7,326.24
500. 00
482. 50
668. 75
1, 651. 25
266, 666. 64
266, 666. 64
357, 600. 59
357, 600. 59
48. 1
48. 1
8. 4
H. 4
0. 0
25. 2
19. 0
16. 2
66. 6
66. 6
63. 0
63. 0
•
•
•
0
•
0
0
•
•
0
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0019
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3304 /FORFEITED FUNDS 75, 000. 00 8,306.50 67, 904. 46 7,495.54 90. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 75, 000. 00 8,306.50 67, 504. 46 7,495.54 90. 0
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 29, 623.00 0.00 17, 420.79 12, 202.21 58.8
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 29, 623.00 0.00 17, 420.79 12.202.21 58.8
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0. 00 6,826.50- 5. 86 5. 86- 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 6,826.50- 5. 86 5.86- 0. 0
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 104, 623.00 1,460.00 84, 931.11 19, 691.89 81.1
FUND TOTAL 104, 623.00 1.480.00 84, 931. 11 19.691.89 81.1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
'FINANCE-FA484
TIME 09:48:22
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0020
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 25,246.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25,246.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0.00
3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE 12, 000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 000.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 37, 246. 00
FUND TOTAL 37, 246.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
15. 00
15. 00
15.00
15.00
12, 412. 87
12, 412. 87
15B. 58
6, 650. 00
6, 808. 58
19, 221. 45
19, 221. 45
12, 833. 13 49.1
12, 833. 13 49. 1
158.58- 0.0
5,350.00 55. 4
5,191.42 56.7
18, 024.55 51.6
18, 024.55 51.6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
'FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0021
TIME 09:48:22 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
705 INSURANCE FUND
• DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
•' 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 78.00 17.75 112.37 34.37- 144.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 78.00 17.75 112.37 34.37- 144.0
• 3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0.00 0.00 34, 883.81 34,883.81- 0.0
110 3957 /TRANSFER IN -DEPT INS SVS 1, 026, 535.00 85, 545.00 684, 360.00 342, 175.00 66.6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 026, 535.00 85, 545.00 719, 243.81 307, 291.19 70.0
• DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 026, 613. 00 85, 562. 75 719, 356. 18 307, 256. 82 70. 0
• FUND TOTAL 1, 026, 613. 00 85, 562. 75 719, 356. 18 307, 256. 82 70. 0
• REPORT TOTALS 17, 986, 165. 25 1, 346, 556. 75 10, 940, 2▪ 42. 02 7, 045, 923. 23 60.6
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
••
•
f
-FINANCE-FA434
' TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
• I
-001 GENERAL FUND
• 0000 DEPT:
1401 GASOLINE INVENTORY
•i OBJECT SUBTOTAL
•
•
•
0
a
•
a
a
a
a
a
a
•
a
2100 ************************
2110 DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1101 CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0001
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORF)RY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
430Q MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4319 SPECIAL EVENTS
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT .
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1121 CITY CLERK
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
19, 406. 00
432. 00
432. 00
18, 000. 00
223. 00
422. 00
38, 915. 00
6, 600. 00
6, 600. 00
300. 00
4, 961. 00
4, 775. 00
200. 00
19. 00
22, 607. 00
32, 862. 00
648. 00
648. 00
79, 025. 00
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
1, 701. 54
0. 00
0. 00
1, 500. 00
18. 60
42. 47
3, 262. 61
14, 000. 13
6, 518. 33
139. 20
12, 000. 00
139. 50
278. 28
33. 075. 44
500. 00
500. 00
500. 00
500. 00
500. 00-
500. 00-
500. 00-
500. 00-
0. 00 5, 405. 87
0. 00 6, 086. 33-
0. 00 292. 80
0. 00 6, 000. 00
0. 00 83. 50
0.00 143.72
0. 00 5, 839. 56
0.00 0. 00 0. 00 6.600.00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 600. 00
14. 09
269. 38
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 884. 00
2, 167. 47
• 131. 58
3, 624. 51
1, 769. 00
0. 00
450. 60
15, 072. 00
21, 047. 69
0. 00 647. 34
-0.00 • 647. 34
5, 430. 08 54, 770. 47
33, 298. 00 2, 797. 00
0. 00 168. 42
0. 00 1, 336. 49
0. 00 3. 006. 00
0. 00 200. 00
0. 00 431. 60-
0. 00 7, 535. 00
0. 00 11, 814. 31
0. 00 0. 66
0. 00 0. 66
0. 00 24, 254. 53
22, 1 10. 00 0. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
72. 1
1508. 8
32. 2
66. 6
62. 5
65. 9
84. 9
0. 0
0. 0
43. 8
73. 0
37. 0
0. 0
2371. 5
66. 6
64. 0
99. 8
99. 8
69. 3
1 1, 188. 00 66. 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:03
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
$ 1121 CITY CLERK
•
S
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
1
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0002
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT -SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
-4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4323 PUBLIC NOTICING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
666. 00 0. 00 0. 00
666. 00 • - ----- . - . 0. 00 0. 00
16, 782. 00 1, 398. 50 1 1 , 188. 00
726. 00 60.84 482. 82
52, 138. 00 4, 256. 34 33, 780. 82
38, 464. 00 137. 53 7, 069. 09
38, 464. 00 137. 53 7, 069. 09
637. 00 40. 18 379. 91
2, 214. 00 193. 56 1 , 41 1. 38
250. 00 0. 00 220. 00
300. 00 0. 00 0. 00
9, 450. 00 577. 56 3, 641. 73
2, 521. 00 210. 00 1 , 680. 00
1 5, 372. 00 1 , 021. 30 7, 333. 02
105, 974. 00 5, 413. 17 48, 182. 93
1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
4, 474. 00
69. 00
16. 00
4, 559. 00
1, 500. 00
23, 500. 00
25, 000. 00
72. 00
1, 808. 00
200. 00
2, 080. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 899. 95
1, 899. 95
0. 00
143. 13
0. 00
143. 13
31, 639. 00 ' 2. 043. 08
2,796.96
0.00
40. 56
2,837.52
1,277.63-
1,899.95
,277.63-
1,899.95
622. 32
1.21
1, 123. 48
150. 00
1,274.69
4,734.53
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
666. 00
666. 00
5, 594. 00
243. 18
18, 357. 18
31,394.91
31, 394.91
257. 09
802. 62
30. 00
300. 00
5, 808. 27 •
841. 00
8, 038. 98
0. 0
0. 0
66. 6
66. 5
64. 7
18. 3
18. 3
59. 6
63. 7
88. 0
0.0
38. 5
66. 6
47. 7
57, 791.07 45.4
1, 677. 04
69. 00
24. 56-
1, 721. 48
2,777.63
21, 600. 05
24, 377. 68
70. 79
684. 52
50. 00
805. 31
62. 5
0. 0
253. 5
62. 2
85. 1
8. 0
2. 4
1.6
62. 1
75. 0
61.2
26, 904.47 14.9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1131 CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0003
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
187, 231. 00
187, 231. 00
300. 00
0. 00
300. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
26, 958. 95
26, 958. 95
17. 97
3.80
21. 77
187, 531. 00 26, 980. 72
1132 CITY PROSECUTOR DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
67, 200. 00
67, 200. 00
600. 00
500. 00
1, 100. 00
5, 600. 00
5, 600. 00
16. 96
0. 00
16. 96
68, 300. 00 5, 616. 96
1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
15, 906. 00
318. 00
318. 00
15, 906. 00
461. 00
32, 909. 00
25, 850. 00
25, 850. 00
700. 00
1, 500. 00
1, 325. 50
0. 00
0. 00
1, 325. 50
38. 44
2, 689. 44
2, 964. 51
2, 964. 51
117, 996. 70
117,996.70
174. 28
35. 91
210. 19
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
118, 206. 89 0. 00
41, 075. 00
41, 075. 00
155. 30
0.00
155. 30
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
360. 47
360. 47
41, 230. 30 360. 47
10, 604. 00
0. 00
267. 58
10, 604. 00
311. 40
21, 786. 98
6, 016. 30
6, 016. 30
38. 79 357. 69
223. 03 942. 77
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
69, 234. 30
69, 234. 30
125. 72
35.91-
89.81
5.91-
89.81
63. 0
63. 0
58. 0
0. 0
70. 0
69, 324.11 63.0
26, 125. 00
26, 125. 00
444. 70
139. 53
584. 23
61. 1
61. 1
25. 8
72. 0
46. 8
26, 709. 23 60. 8
5, 302. 00
318. 00
50. 42
5, 302. 00
149. 60
11, 122. 02
19, 833. 70
19, 833. 70
66. 6
0. 0
84. 1
66. 6
67. 5
66. 2
23. 2
23. 2
342. 31 51. 0
557. 23 62. 8
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
1
•
. FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
001 GENERAL FUND
1141 CITY TREASURER
DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1201 CITY MANAGER DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
LEGISLATIVE
91. 00
300. 00
2, 005. 00
4, 596. 00
63. 355. 00
535, 824. 00
MOMT/SUPPORT
135, 580. 00
2, 339. 00
2, 339. 00
1, 596. 00
141, 854. 00
3, 405. 00
3, 405. 00
840. 00
1, 350. 00
665. 00
971. 00
6, 577. 00
10, 403. 00
155, 662. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
184, 439. 00
2, 554. 00
4, 164. 00
4, 164. 00
20, 980. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
167. 00
428. 82
6, 082. 77
51, 568. 78
10, 892. 52
0. 00
0. 00
146. 11
11, 038. 63
0. 00
25. 00
1, 336. 00
2, 661. 46
30, 464. 74
297, 589. 86
72, 109. 99
6, 518. 33
2. 864. 91
374. 65
81, 867. 88
• PAGE
DATE
66. O% OF
0004
03/14/94
YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
360. 47
0. 00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
91. 00
275. 00
669. 00
1, 934. 54
32, 890. 26
237, 873. 67
0. 0
8. 3
66. 6
57. 9
48. 0
55. 6
63, 470. 01 53. 1
4. 179. 33- 278. 6
525. 91- 122. 4
1, 221. 35 23. 4
59, 986. 12 57. 7
11. 00 147. 87 0. 00 3, 257. 13 4. 3
11. 00 147. 87 0. 00 3, 257. 13 4. 3
50. 12
69. 45
0. 00
0. 00
548. 00
667. 57
11, 717. 20
17, 097. 38
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
444. 08
847. 36
0. 00
50. 00
4, 384. 00
5, 725. 44
87, 741. 19
126, 039. 17
629. 97
0. 00
7, 009. 52
10. 502. 21
0.00 395.92 52.8
0. 00 502. 64 62. 7
0. 00 665. 00 0. 0
0. 00 921. 00 5. 1
0. 00 2, 193. 00 66. 6
0. 00 4, 677. 56 55. 0
0. 00 67, 920. 81 56. 3
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
58, 399. 83 68. 3
1, 924. 03 24. 6
4, 164. 00 0. 0
2, 845. 52- 168. 3
10, 477. 79 50. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
A` 4�
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
E FA454
}r; ";TIME 20:33:05
t FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
1 -GENERAL FUND
1202 FINANCE ADMIN
0
0
M
2,
2�I
I2�
121:
,d~
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
408. 00
787. 00
217, 496. 00
31, 218. 00
31, 218. 00
2, 095. 00
7, 056. 00
205. 00
2, 371. 00
0. 00
10, 401. 00
22, 128. 00
270, 842. 00
f 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
1,1
14-
•••-! "
I
s.
•
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE.
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4320 MEDICAL EXAMS
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
61, 604. 00
1, 269. 00
1. 269. 00
64, 142. 00
73, 500. 00
2, 500. 00
76, 000. 00
1, 500.. 00
4, 000. 00
415. 00
2, 050. 00
30, 874. 00
5, 626. 00
44, 465. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
57. 66
17, 155. 04
0. 00
0.00
175. 70
969. 66
0. 00
211.87
0.00
867. 00
2,224.23
19, 379. 27
5, 164. 68
0. 00
0. 00
5, 164. 68
3, 560. 96
0. 00
3, 560. 96
104. 40
279. 48
0. 00
10. 00-
0. 00
469. 00
842. 88
204. 34
651.80
145, 037. 01
29, 414. 70
29, 414. 70
1,538.00
4,559.12
225. 00
1,913.50
180. 00
6,936.00
15, 351. 62
189, 803. 33
40, 578. 93
0. 00
1. 593. 76
42, 172. 69
50, 545. 49
0. 00
50, 545. 49
826. 39
2. 825. 13
410. 00
640. 50
11. 192. 00
3, 752. 00
19, 646. 02
PAGE 0005
DATE 03/14/94
66.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
203. 66
135. 20
72, 458. 99
1,803.30
1,803.30
557. 00
2, 496. 88
20. 00-
457. 50
180. 00-
3, 465. 00
6, 776. 38
81, 038. 67
21. 025. 07
1, 269. 00
324. 76-
21, 969. 31
22, 954. 51
2,500.00
25, 454. 51
673. 61
1. 174. 87
5. 00
1, 409. 50
19, 682. 00
1, 874. 00
24, 818. 98
50. 0
82. 8
66. 6
94. 2
94. 2
73. 4
64. 6
109. 7
80. 7
0. 0
66. 6
69. 3
70. 0
65. 8
0. 0
125. 5
65. 7
68.7
0. 0
66. 5
55. 0
70. 6
98. 7
31. 2
36. 2
66. 6
44. 1
•
•
•
•
0
0
0
0
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL •
1205 CABLE TV
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
184, 607. 00 9, 568. 52
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185. SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
2, 214. 00
149. 00
35. 00
2, 398. 00
500. 00
0. 00
113. 00
613. 00
196. 00
12. 14
2. 85
210. 99
147. 83
0. 00
9. 00
156. 83
3, 01 1. 00 367. 82
1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
40, 176. 00
500. 00
727. 00
727. 00
0. 00
42, 130. 00
54, 509. 00
54, 509. 00
4, 221. 00
3, 766. 00
300. 00
1', 758. 00
10, 045. 00
0. 00
200, 000. 00
200, 000. 00
3, 031. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
43. 95
3. 074. 95
6, 114.'68
6, 114. 68
348. 12
456. 27
0. 00
147. 00
951. 39
54. 11
26, 619. 50
26, 673. 61
PAGE 0006
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE '
112, 364. 20 0. 00
1,594.25
98. 83
23. 11
1, 716. 19
393. 25
325. 00
72. 00
790. 25
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 506. 44 0. 00
26, 319. 73
313. 37
0.00
0.00
314. 49
26, 947. 59
33, 267. 07
33, 267. 07
2,406.48
12, 065. 09
25. 92
1, 176. 00
15, 673. 49
54. 11
54, 529. 67
54, 583. 78
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
137. 48
137. 48
250. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
250. 00
0.00
31, 269. 24
31. 269. 24
72, 242. 80 60. 8
619. 75
50. 17
11. 89
681. 81
106. 75
325.00-
41.00
25.00-
41.00
177.25-
72.0
77.25-
72.0
66. 3
66. 0
71. 5
78. 6
0. 0
63. 7
128. 9
504. 56 83. 2
13, 856. 27 65. 5
186.63 62.6
727. 00 0. 0
727.00 0.0
314.49- 0.0
15, 182.41 63.9
21, 104. 45
21, 104. 45
61. 2
61.2
1, 564. 52 62. 9
8, 299. 09- 320. 3
274. 08 8. 6
582. 00 66. 8
5, 878. 49- 158. 5
54. 11-
114, 201. 09
114, 146. 98
0. 0
42. 8
42. 9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND -------
DIVISION
-.--.._DIVISION TOTAL
1207 BUS LICENSE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
306, 684. 00 36, 814. 63
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL_ SERVICES •
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
53, 166. 00
200. 00
1, 228. 00
1, 228. 00
5, 162. 00
320. 00
387. 00
61, 691. 00
25. 00
154. 00
179. 00
700. 00
4, 000. 00
175. 00
150. 00
40. 00
1, 000. 00
5, 335. 00
1 1 , 400. 00
3, 867. 58
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
815. 68
50. 58
11. 37
4, 745. 21
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
67. 13
248. 75
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
95. 64
445. 00
856. 52
71. 00 0. 00
71. 00 0. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
130, 471. 93 31, 656. 72
37, 308. 25
21. 68
0. 00
4,358.60
2,054.58
127. 39
76. 28
43, 946. 78
17.92
0. 01-
17.91
428. 81
2, 156. 08
11. 98
29. 95
40. 00
916. 41
3, 560. 00
7, 143. 23
41. 58
41. 58
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
144, 555. 35 52. 8
15, 857. 75
178. 32
1,228.00
3, 130. 60-
3, 107. 42
192. 61
310. 72
17, 744. 22
7. 08
154. 01
161. 09
271. 19
1, 843. 92
163. 02
120. 05
0. 00
83. 59
1, 775. 00
4, 256. 77
29. 42
29. 42
70. 1
10. 8
0. 0
354. 9
39. 8
39. 8
19. 7
71. 2
71. 6
0. 0
10. 0
61. 2
53. 9
6. 8
19. 9
100. 0
91.6
66. 7
62. 6
58. 5
58. 5
DIVISION TOTAL 73,341.00-- -5,601.73 51, 149. 50 0. 00 22, 191. 50 69. 7
1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
31, 812. 00
636. 00
636. 00
461. 00
33, 545. 00
2,651.00
0. 00
0. 00
38. 44
2, 689. 44
21, 208. 00
0. 00
611.60
316. 38
22, 135. 98
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
10, 604. 00
636. 00
24. 40
144. 62
11, 409. 02
66. 6
0. 0
96. 1
68. 6
65. 9
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
0
•
0
0
•
•
•
•
0
0
0
•
s
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
FINANCE-FA434
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1208 GEN APPROP
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
23, 400. 00
23, 400. 00
250. 00
150. 00
1, 484. 00
1, 884. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 58, 829.00
1212. EMP BENEFITS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
2,457.71
2,457.71
18. 33
1,264.30-
124.00
,264.30-
124.00
1,121.97-
4,025.18
,121.97-
4,025.18
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 596, 608.00 85, 860.21
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 596,608.00 85,860.21
DIVISION TOTAL 596, 608.00 85, 860.21
1213 RETIREMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4180 RETIREMENT 1, 013, 034.00 81, 973.48
-OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.013, 034.00 81, 973.48
DIVISION TOTAL 1.013, 034.00 81, 973.48
1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4322 UNCLASSIFIED 130, 759.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 130, 759. 00 0. 00
14, 103. 79
14, 103. 79
170. 95
27, 218. 23-
992. 00
26, 055. 28-
10.184.49
8-
10.184.49
418, 062. 13
418, 062. 13
418, 062. 13
575, 960. 47
575, 960. 47
575, 960. 47
f.,
:F
,q
4e
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
2, 234. 83
0. 00
2, 234. 83
2, 234. 83
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
9,296.21
9,296.21
79. 05
25, 133. 40
492. 00
25, 704. 45
46, 409. 68
178, 545. 87 •
178, 545. 87
178, 545. 87
437, 073. 53
437, 073. 53
0. 00 437, 073. 53
130, 759. 00
130, 759. 00
60. 2
60. 2
68. 3
16655. 6
66. 8
1264. 3
21. 1
70. 0
70. 0
70. 0
56. 8
56. 8
56. 8
0. 0
0. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 130, 759. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 130, 759. 00 O. 0
1 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2.793, 377.00 255, 308.04 1, 578, 243.68 33, 891.55 1,181,241.77 57.7
. 2101 POLICE DEPT: POLICE
1
•
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
593, 534. 00 47, 481. 28
387, 419.38 0.00
206, 114.62 65.2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2101 POLICE
DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY
4106 REGULAR. OVERTIME
4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME
4109 COURT TIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4114 POLICE RESERVES
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4187 UNIFORMS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST
4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
POLICE
1, 669, 371. 00
18, 600. 00
31, 600. 00
98, 251. 00
23, 754. 00
44. 565. 00
45, 943. 00
0. 00
5, 650. 00
8, 068. 00
2, 600. 00
861. 00
27, 450. 00
15, 877. 00
2, 586, 124. 00
91, 512. 00
6, 300. 00
97, 812. 00
28, 000. 00
29. 000. 00
9, 800. 00
2, 625. 00
5, 300. 00
21, 500. 00
27, 875. 00
6. 000. 00
5, 100. 00
645. 00
6, 900. 00
1, 000. 00
408, 481. 00
552, 226. 00
1, 782. 00
20, 575. 00
42, 500. 00
64, 857. 00
MONTHLY EXP
145, 305. 18
1, 440. 00
6, 117. 04
5, 540. 55
891. 49
0. 00
4, 675. 08
148. 80
0. 00
605. 84
462. 48
9. 22
4, 644. 84
1, 466. 96
218, 788. 76
7,254.40
482. 00
7,736.40
3. 231. 91
2, 503. 24
883. 87
0. 00
642. 23
1, 415. 38
2, 472: 93
1, 159. 48
677. 70
0. 00
1, 314. 33
0. 00
34, 039. 00
48, 340. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
YTD EXPND.
1 , 1 19, 244. 25
10, 145. 00
28, 924. 31
70, 835. 62
18, 760. 26
39, 410. 17
73, 603. 56
148. 80
373. 00
5, 047. 11
938. 12
116. 05
22, 459. 80
1 1, 240. 34
1, 788, 665. 77
55, 124. 84
1,715.54
' 56, 840. 38
20, 615. 52
21, 811. 13
5.072.52
189. 46
3,743.16
11, 661.37
14, 872. 02
6,200.78
2,235.58
285.00
4,874.69
913. 90
272, 312. 00
364, 787. 13
119.07
9, 764. 14
0.00
9.883. 21
PAGE 0009
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
364. 58
0. 00
364. 58
250. 00
0. 00
250. 00
1, 250. 00
657. 88
194. 61
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
32. 50
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 134. 99
392. 89
1, 977. 47
0. 00
2, 370. 36
550, 126. 75
8,455.00
2,675.69
27, 415. 38
4,993.74
5,154.83
27,660.56-
148.80-
5,277.00
7,660.56-
148.80-
5,277.00
3,020.89
1,661.88
744. 95
4,625.62
4,636.66
797, 093. 65
36, 137. 16
4,584.46
40, 721. 62
6,134.48
6,530.99
4,532.87
2,435.54
1.556.84
9,838.63
12, 970. 48
200.78-
2,864.42
00.78-
2,864.42
360. 00
2,025.31
86. 10
136, 169. 00
185, 303. 88
1,270.04
8,833.39
42, 500. 00
52. 603. 43
67. 0
54. 5
91. 5
72. 0
78. 9
88. 4
160.2
0. 0
6. 6
62. 5
36. 0
13. 4
83. 1
70. 7
69. 1
60. 5
27. 2
58. 3
78. 0
77. 4
53. 7
7. 2
70. 6
54. 2
53. 4
103. 3
43. 8
44. 1
70. 6
91. 3
66. 6
66. 4
28. 7
57. 0
0. 0
18. 8
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2101 POLICE
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2201 FIRE
DEPT:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
POLICE
24, 727. 00
24, 727. 00
3, 325, 746. 00
3, 325, 746. 00
DEPT: FIRE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4108 FLSA OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4187 UNIFORMS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
8, 175. 00
949, 143. 00
56, 000. 00
28, 550. 00
19, 829. 00
19, 829. 00
5, 330. 00
10, 800. 00
331. 00
8, 200. 00
2, 538. 00
1, 108, 725. 00
40, 844. 00
40, 844. 00
2, 500. 00
1, 300. 00
4, 000. 00
2, 000. 00
2, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
3, 370. 00
114, 986. 00
131, 156. 00
4, 750. 00
4, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0.00
274, 865. 23
274, 865. 23
740. 30
76, 393. 24
5,794.13
3.737.14
0. 00
1,357.00
768. 75
0.00
47. 66
711.87
339. 60
89, 889. 69
937. 08
937. 08
239. 06
65. 09
242. 92
215. 41
14. 02
0. 00
370. 00
9, 582. 00
10, 728. 50
2, 621. 39
0. 00
10, 720. 44
10, 720. 44
2, 230, 896. 93
2, 230. 896. 93
5, 352. OB
621, 740. 03
46, 308. 18
31, 339. 14
0. 00
8, 247. 62
2, 050. 00
4, 150. 00
127. 10
5, 376. 35
2, 638. 60
727, 329. 10
17, 110. 64
17, 110. 64
1,855.28
1,251.12
1,764.70
1,769.32
216. 51
495. 00
3,257.55
76, 656. 00
87, 265. 48
3.957.72
795. 64
PAGE 0010
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
5,119.93
5, 119.93
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 005. 91
0. 00
1,005.91
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
536. 38
14, 006. 56
14, 006. 56
1, 089, 729. 14
1 , 089, 729. 14
2,822.92
327, 402. 97
9,691.82
2.789.14-
19,829.00
.789.14-
19,829.00
11, 581.38
3.280.00
6,650.00
203. 90
1,817.74
. 100.60-
380,389.99
00.60-
380,389.99
23, 733. 36
23,733.36
644. 72
48. 88
2, 235. 30
230. 68
1, 783. 49
505. 00
112. 45
38, 330. 00
43, 890. 52
792. 28
2,667.98
43. 3
43. 3
67. 2
67. 2
65. 4
65. 5
82. 6
109. 7
0. 0
41. 5
38. 4
38. 4
38. 3
77. 8
103. 9
65. 6
41. 8
41. 8
74. 2
96. 2
44. 1
88. 4
10. 8
49. 5
96. 6
66. 6
66. 5
83. 3
33. 3
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Q
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2201 FIRE
5400 EQUIPMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2401 ANIMAL CONTROL
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME•
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4187 UNIFORMS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: FIRE
DEPT:
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE •
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
8, 750. 00
39, 772. 00
39, 772. 00
1, 329, 247. 00
1, 329, 247. 00
ANIMAL REGULTN
66, 220. 00
5, 716. 00
1, 000. 00
1. 630. 00
1. 630. 00
500. 00
542. 00
821. 00
78, 059. 00
1, 000. 00
6, 000. 00
7, 000. 00
700. 00
600. 00
400. 00
1, 300. 00
2, 000. 00
100. 00
10, 699. 00
15, 799. 00
500. 00
500. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
2,621.39
0.00
0.00
104, 176. 66
104, 176. 66
12. 757. 53
489. 70
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
71. 40
42. 22
36. 19
13, 397. 04
178. 35
189. 53
367. 88
22. 72
0. 00
0. 00
135. 50
0. 00
0. 00
892. 00
1, 050. 22
4,753.36
0. 00
0. 00
836, 458. 58
836. 458. 58
44, 768. 53
3,905.60
931. 99
3, 335. 16
1. 549. 50
600. 68
262. 65
389. 23
55, 743. 34
468. 12
2.753.21
3,221.33
331. 63
328. 13
219. 61
502. 97
265. 71
0. 00
7, 136. 00
8,784.05
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
PAGE 0011
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
536. 38
0. 00
0.00
1.542.29
1,542.29
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
3,460.26
39. 772. 00
39. 772. 00
491, 246. 13
491, 246. 13
21. 451. 47
1, 810. 40
68. 01
1,705.16-
60.50
,705.16-
60.50
100.68-
279.35
00.68-
279.35
431. 77
22, 315. 66
531.88
3,246.79
3,776.67
368. 37
271. e7
180. 39
797. 03
1, 734. 29
100. 00
3. 563. 00
7, 014. 95
500. 00
500. 00
/.
60. 4
0. 0
0. 0
63. 0
63. 0
67. 6
68. 3
93. 1
204. 6
95. 0
120. 1
48. 4
47. 4
71. 4
46. 8
45. 8
46. 0
47. 3
54. 6
54. 9
38. 6
13. 2
0. 0
66. 6
55. 5
0. 0
0.0
•
•
•
0
0
0
•
•
0
•
0
•
•
•
•
41 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
• TIME 20:33:05 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
4/FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
PAGE 0012
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
• DIVISION TOTAL 101 , 358. 00 14, 815. 14 67, 748. 72 0. 00
• DEPARTMENT TOTAL 101, 358. 00 14, 815. 14 67. 748. 72 0. 00
2701 CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP
O 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4103 REGULAR SALAR IES/SAFETY 11, 392. 00 945. 24 7, 610. 73 0. 00
II 4111
VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 227. 00 O. 00 0.00 O. 00
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 227. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
4187 UNIFORMS 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 346. 00 945. 24 7, 610. 73 0. 00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT .SERVICE/PRIVATE O. 00 0. 00 726. 40 0. 00
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2, 343. 00 0. 00 2, 343. 13 0. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 343. 00 0. 00 3, 069. 53 0. 00
•
•
i
i
I
•
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHOS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3101 MEDIANS
200. 00
500. 00
750. 00
2, 852. 00
4, 302. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
19, 991. 00
19, 991. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
57, 784. 00
500. 00
1, 362. 00
1, 362. 00
96. 00
0. 00
411. 00
61, 515. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
238. 00
238. 00
62. 73
0. 00
200. 00
1, 904. 00
2, 166. 73
0. 00 315. 05
0. 00 315. 05
1, 183. 24 13, 162. 04
1, 183. 24 13, 162. 04
4, 593. 80
13. 52
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
28. 68
4, 636. 00
38, 769. 55
185. 74
0. 00
892. 23
96. 05
5. 96
488. 05
40, 437. 58
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
33, 609. 28 66. 8
33.609. 28 66. 8
3, 781. 27
227. 00
227. 00
500. 00
4, 735. 27
726. 40-
7. 13-
726. 53-
137. 27
500. 00
550. 00
948. 00
2, 135. 27
684. 95
684. 95
6, 828. 96
0. 00 6, 828. 96
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
66. 8
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
61. 6
0. 0
100. 0
131. 0
31. 3
0. 0
26. 6
66. 7
50. 3
31. 5
31. 5
65. 8
65. 8
19, 014. 45 67. 0
314. 26 37. 1
1, 362. 00 O. 0
469. 77 65. 5
0. 05- 100. 0
5. 96- 0. 0
77. 05- 118. 7
21, 077. 42 65. 7
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
It.
® 'I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
0
1
1
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
3101 MEDIANS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3, 000. 00
1, 365. 00
4, 365. 00
9, 500. 00
2, 200.'00
560. 00
500. 00
.7, 462. 00
.20, 222. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 86, 102. 00
3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
S 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
1
a
110. 726. 00
800. 00
2, 357. 00
2, 357. 00
17, 125. 00
1, 062. 00
1, 397. 00
135, 824. 00
46. 855. 00
46, 855. 00
23, 244. 00
3, 400. 00
12, 220. 00
51. 888. 00
90, 752. 00
273, 431. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
876. 03
43. 30
0. 00
0. 00
622. 00
1, 541. 33
6, 177. 33
756. 25
0. 00
756. 25
6, 410. 28
1, 682. 95
642. 50
202. 09
4, 976. 00
13, 913. 82
55, 107. 65
10, 349. 39 76, 896. 33
8. 35 510. 44
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 2, 665. 42
1, 629. 75 10, 647. 10
101. 05 660. 12
113. 85 896. 16
12, 202. 39 92, 275. 57
3, 692. 86 27, 577. 00
3, 692. 86 27, 577. 00
628. 48 9, 399. 19
171.03 2, 029. 69
1, 123. 63 10, 186. 72
4, 324. 00 34, 592. 00
6, 247. 14 56, 207. 60
22, 142. 39 176, 060. 17
67, 791. 00 5, 304. 01
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
O. 00
2, 243. 75 25. 2
1, 365. 00 0. 0
3, 608. 75 17. 3
3, 089. 72 67. 4
517. 05 76. 4
82. 50- 114. 7
297. 91 40. 4
2, 486. 00 66. 6
6, 308. 18 68. 8
30, 994. 35 64. 0
0. 00 33. 829. 67 69. 4
0. 00 289. 56 63. 8
0. 00 2, 357. 00 0. 0
0. 00 308. 42- 113. 0
0. 00 6, 477. 90 62. 1
0. 00 401. 88 62. 1
0. 00 500. 84 64. 1
0. 00 43, 548. 43 67. 9
0. 00 19, 278. 00 58. 8
0. 00 19. 278. 00 58. 8
307. 08 13, 537. 73 41. 7
0. 00 1, 370. 31 59.6 .
4, 380. 04 2, 346. 76- 119. 2
0. 00 17, 296. 00 66. 6
4, 687. 12 29, 857. 28 67. 1
4,687.12 92. 683. 71 66. 1
41, 020. 94 0. 00
26, 770. 06 60. 5
•
•
•
•
•t
•
•
•
1
1
•
•
1
1
0
•
•
•.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
s
•
a
•
a
a
s
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185. SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
. 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4101 PLANNING
250. 00
1,401.00
1, 401. 00
192. 00
0. 00
477. 00
71, 512. 00
14, 045. 00
7, 975. 00
22, 020. 00
5, 265. 00
19, 437. 00
1, 400. 00
1, 000. 00
7, 954. 00
35, 056. 00
3, 634. 00
3, 634. 00
132, 222. 00
491, 755. 00
DEPT: PLANNING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
148, 760. 00
100. 00
3, 432. 00
3, 432. 00
3, 555. 00
159, 279. 00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 7,630.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
8. 35
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
18. 89
5, 331. 25
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
664. 92
91. 42
101.29
72. 39
663. 00
1,593.02
0.00
0.00
6,924.27
35, 243.99
10, 375. 74
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
112. 92
10, 488. 66
225. 00
130. 97
0. 00
1,055.94
192. 10
11.92
494. 75
42, 906. 62
8, 895. 00
3, 094. 39
11, 989. 39
4,449.45
5,337.64
438. 31
314. 95
5,304.00
15. 844. 35
3,633.22
3,633.22
74, 373. 58
305, 541. 40
92, 248. 22
0. 00
0. 00
393. 47
98B. 74
93, 630. 43
2, 900. 39
PAGE 0014
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
637. 57
0. 00
324. 75
0. 00
962. 32
0.00
0.00
962. 32
5,649.44
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
119. 03
1.401.00
345. 06
0. 10-
11.
0-
11. 92-
17. 75-
28, 605. 38
5, 150. 00
4, 880. 61
10, 030. 61
815. 55
13,461.79
961. 69
360. 30
2,650.00
16, 249. 33
0. 78
0.78
56, 886. 10
180, 564. 16
56, 511. 78
100. 00
3, 432. 00
3, 038. 53
2, 566. 26
65, 648. 57
4, 729. 61
52. 3
0. 0
75. 3
100. 0
0. 0
103. 7
59. 9
63. 3
38. 8
54. 4
84. 5
30. 7
31. 3
63. 9
66. 6
47. 9
99. 9
99. 9
56. 9
63. 2
62. 0
0. 0
0. 0
11. 4
27. 8
58. 7
38. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
•
•
•
a
•
• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015
TIME 20:33:05 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
0l7 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
s
_001_ GENERAL FUND
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
• n 4101 PLANNING DEPT: PLANNING
9
"^ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7. 630. 00 225. 00 2, 900. 39 0. 00 4, 729. 61 38. 0
k 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
•'n, 4304 TELEPHONE 2, 100. 00 135. 42 1. 208. 44 0. 00 891. 56 57. 5
H 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6, 000. 00 157. 85 1, 673. 95 0. 00 4, 326. 05 27. 8
"'� 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 210. 00 0. 00 29. 61 0. 00 180. 39 14. 1
,nl 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 600.'00 8. 60 18. 60 O. 00 581. 40 3. 1
4315 MEMBERSHIP 400. 00 0.00 404. 00 O. 00 4. 00- 101. O
91 4316 TRAINING 1, 000. 00 32. 00- 570. 00 0. 00 430. 00 57. 0
."j 4396 TR SFR OUT -INS USER CHGS .9, 467. 00 789. 00 6, 312. 00 0. 00 3, 155. 00 66. 6
- --. - OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 19, 777. 00 1, 058. 87 10, 216. 60 0. 00 9, 560. 40 51. 6
•
.I
•
•
DIVISION TOTAL 186. 686. 00
4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: PLANNING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
0 4201 BUILDING
•
0
1
5, 715. 00
5, 715. 00
3, 500. 00
3. 500. 00
9, 215. 00
195, 901. 00
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
195, 748. 00
500. 00
4, 688. 00
4, 688. 00
16. 814. 00
1, 042. 00
2, 349. 00
225, 829. 00
11.772.53 106. 747. 42
281. 00
281. 00
143. 30
143. 30
424. 30
12, 196. 83
16. 108. 69
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
814. 08
50. 47
186. 47
17, 159. 71
2, 180. 50
2, 180. 50
1, 781. 09
1, 781. 09
3, 961. 59
110, 709. 01
131, 677. 86
69. 86
19, 654. 71
7, 556. 71
13. 704. 15
766.98
1, 452. 22
174, 882. 49
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
79, 938. 58 57. 1
3. 534. 50
3, 534. 50
1, 718. 91
1, 718. 91
5,253.41
38. 1
38. 1
50. 8
50. 8
42. 9
85, 191. 99 56. 5
64, 070. 14 67. 2
430. 14 13. 9
14, 966. 71- 419. 2
2, 868. 71- 161. 1
3, 109. 85 81. 5
275. 02 73. 6
896. 78 61. 8
50, 946. 51 77. 4
•
•
•
•
•
0
0
0
0
•
0
•
•
0
0
•
•
0
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4201 BUILDING
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
24, 393. 00
665. 00
25, 058. 00
3, 730. 00
7, 200. 00
1, 039. 00
1, 200. 00
400. 00
2, 900. 00
23, 775. 00
40, 244. 00
300. 00
300. 00
291, 431. 00
4202 PUB WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4165 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4187 UNIFORMS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
50. 235. 00
250. 00
1, 064. 00
1, 064. 00
6, 141. 00
381. 00
5, 760. 00
934. 00
65, 829. 00
1, 970. 00
1, 970. 00
4, 500. 00
6, 900. 00
100. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
250. 00
0. 00
250. 00
227. 55
274. 71
21. 00
89. 98
0. 00
58. 94
1 , 981. 00
2, 653. 18
0.00
0.00
20, 062. 89
3, 693. 70
8. 35
0. 00
0..00
0. 00
0. 00
473. 77
130. 85
4, 306. 67
110. 00
110. 00
387. 80
795. 13
0. 00
2, 051. 18
0. 00
2, 051. 18
1, 896. 49
1, 998. 36
430. 21
328. 73
345. 00
721. 74
15, 848. 00
21, 568. 53
213. 19
213. 19
198,715.39
31, 030. 91
157. 75
0. 00
1, 611. 58
6, 141. 25
566. 25
3, 708. 08
1, 404. 73
44, 620. 55
1, 025. 06
1, 025. 06
3, 303. 12
5, 742. 07
80. 93
PAGE
DATE
66.0% OF
0016
03/14/94
YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
85. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
85. 00
0. 00
0.00
85. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
22, 341. 82
665. 00
. 23, 006. 82
1, 833. 51
5, 116. 64
608. 79
871. 27
55. 00
2, 178. 26
7, 927. 00
18, 590. 47
86. 81
86. 81
92, 630. 61
19, 204. 09
92. 25
1, 064. 00
547. 58-
0. 25-
185. 25-
2, 051. 92
470. 73-
21, 208. 45
944. 94
944. 94
1, 196. 88
1, 157. 93
19. 07
8. 4
0.0
8. 1
50. 8
28. 9
41. 4
27. 3
86. 2
24. 8
66. 6
53. 8
71. 0
71. 0
68. 2
61. 7
63. 1
0. 0
151. 4
100. 0
148. 6
64. 3
150. 3
67. 7
52. 0
52. 0
73. 4
83.2
80. 9
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4202 PUB WKS ADMIN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BV FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO.MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
700. 00
800. 00
1, 000. 00
2, 288. 00
0. 00
53, 804. 00
70, 092. 00
2, 148. 00
1, 500. 00
3. 648. 00
141, 539. 00
4204 BLDG MAINT DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4187 UNIFORMS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT •
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES'
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
145. 414. 00
500. 00
3, 046. 00
3, 046. 00
192. 00
0. 00
0. 00
301. 00
152, 499. 00
17, 148. 00
0. 00
17, 148. 00
111, 300. 00
25, 000. 00
- 1. 850. 00
1, 100. 00
2, 850. 00
73. 150. 00
215. 250. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
46. 29
0. 00
12. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 484. 00
5, 725. 22
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
10, 141. 89
12, 120. 71
8. 35
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
18. 89
12, 147. 95
286. 39
914. 13
253. 00
2, 105. 72
0. 00
35, 872. 00
48, 557. 36
1, 434. 03
648. 26
2, 082. 29
96, 285. 26
96, 051. 15
293. 92
0. 00
3, 960. 69
192. 10
11. 92
0. 00
478. 10
100. 987. 88
1,425.00 11, 628.84
41.90
1,425.00 11, 670.74
8, 960. 66
5, 291. 62
-91. 56
0. 00
55. 31
6, 096. 00
20, 495. 15
75, 012. 06
15, 375. 16
929. 99
225. 68
581.60
48, 768. 00
140, 892. 49
PAGE 0017
DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
149. 39
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
149. 39
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
149. 39
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
/.
413.61 40.9
263. 52- 132.9
747. 00 25. 3
182.28 92.0
0.00 0.0
17, 932.00 66.6
21, 385.25 69.4
713.97 66.7
851.74 43.2
1,565.71 57.0
45, 104. 35 68. 1
49, 362. 85
206. 08
3, 046. 00
914. 69-
0. 10-
11. 92-
0. 00
177. 10-
51, 511. 12
5, 519. 16
41.90-
5.477.26
1.90-
5.477.26
36, 287. 94
9, 624. 84
920. 01
874. 32
2, 268. 40
24. 382. 00
74, 357. 51
66. 0
58. 7
0. 0
130. 0
100.0
0. 0
0. 0
158. 8
66. 2
67. 8
0. 0
68. 0
67. 3
61. 5
50. 2
20. 5
20. 4
66. 6
65. 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
e
•
•
•
- FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
4205 EQUIP SERVICE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
384, 897. 00
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
'4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL '
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4601 COMM RESOURCES
84, 582. 00
200. 00
1, 744. 00
1, 744. 00
96. 00
571. 00
641. 00
89, 578. 00
2, 540. 00
1, 260. 00
3, 800. 00
5, 200. 00
2, 000. 00
1, 500. 00
10, 855. 00
19, 555. 00
4, 500. 00
4, 500. 00
117, 433.00
935, 300. 00
DEPT: COMM PROMOTION
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN •
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
137, 066. 00
3,361.00
3, 361. 00
79, 114. 00
3, 593. 00
2, 047. 00
228, 542. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
34, 068. 10
6, 960. 90
8. 35
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
49. 58
7, 018. 83
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
199. 13
14. 83
0. 00
905. 00
1, 118. 96
0.00
0.00
8, 137. 79
72, 410. 67
13, 503. 88
0. 00
0. 00
4, 246. 32
133. 57
134. 20
18, 017. 97
253, 551. 11
56, 100. 12
33. 40
0. 00
442. 52
96. 05
5. 96
637. 65
57, 315. 70
0. 00
828. 67
828. 67
2,226.75
932. 99
415. 55
7,240.00
10, 815. 29
0. 00
0.00
68, 959. 66
617, 511.42
80, 398. 95
219. 60
0.00
44, 102. 34
1,827.42
1,293.80
127, 842.11
PAGE 0018
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
234. 39
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
131, 345. 89
28, 481. 88
166. 60
1, 744. 00
1, 301. 48
0. 05-
565. 04
3. 35
32,262. 30
2,540.00
431. 33
2,971.33
2, 973. 25
1,067.01
1, 084. 45
3, 615. 00
8, 739. 71
4, 500. 00
4, 500. 00
48, 473. 34
317, 554. 19
56, 667. 05
3, 141. 40
3, 361. 00
35, 011. 66
1, 765. 58
753. 20
100, 699. 89
65. 8
66. 3
16. 7
0.0
25. 3
100. 0
1.0
99. 4
63. 9
0. 0
65. 7
21. 8
42. 8
46. 6
27. 7
66. 6
55. 3
0. 0
0. 0
58. 7
66. 0
58. 6
6. 5
0. 0
55. 7
50. 8
63. 2
55. 9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
40
•
•
•
•
•
a
a
a
•
a
a
a
a
a
s
•
•
•
9
I
• FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4601 COMM RESOURCES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: COMM PROMOTION
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGRM
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4302 ADVERTISING
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
6101 PARKS
8, 125. 00
60, 700. 00
68, 825. 00
12, 000. 00
3, 000. 00
8, 000. 00
8, 724. 00
750. 00
350. 00
700. 00
26, 978. 00
60, 502. 00
357, 869. 00
357, 869. 00
DEPT: PARKS/REC
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4304 TELEPHONE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
5, 646. 80 6, 346. 23
2, 058. 00 41, 863. 45
7, 704. 80 48, 209. 68
3, 085. 13 8, 227. 02
233. 82 1, 825. 06
272. 79 4. 883. 63
25. 89 5, 119. 58
63. B1 447. 19
40. 49 308. 59
110. 00 555. 00
2, 248. 00 17, 984. 00
6, 079. 93 39, 350. 07
31, 802. 70 215, 401. 86
31, 802. 70 215, 401. 86
71, 303. 00 5, 805. 57 44, 984. 33
600. 00 14. 66 212. 65
1, 643. 00 - ---------- - - 0. 00 . . - - 0. 00
1, 643. 00 0. 00 1, 284. 44
192. 00 0. 00 192. 10
0.00 • 0.00 11.92
497. 00 44. 33 568. 62
75, 878. 00 5, 864. 56 47, 254. 06
136, 654. 00 8, 585. 50 61, 938. 78
18, 500. 00 2, 500. 00 2, 500. 00
155, 154. 00 11, 085. 50 64, 438. 78
51, 000. 00 3, 966. 24 42, 635. 34
280. 00 16. 96 176..76
9, 500. 00 456. 95 2, 351. 61
1, 400. 00 0. 00 522. 32
PAGE 0019
DATE 03/14/94
66.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00 1 , 778. 77
0. 00 18, 836. 55
0. 00 20, 615. 32
0. 00 3, 772. 98
0. 00 1, 174. 94
0. 00 3, 116. 37
370. 26 3, 234. 16
0. 00 302. 81
0. 00 41. 41
0. 00 145. 00
0. 00 8, 994. 00
370. 26 20, 781. 67
•
370. 26 142, 096.138
370. 26 142, 096. 88
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 595. 23
0. 00
26, 318. 67
387. 35
1. 643. 00
358. 56
0. 10-
11. 92-
71. 62-
28, 623. 94
74, 715. 22
16, 000. 00
90, 715. 22
8, 364. 66
103. 24
5, 553. 16
877. 68
78. 1
68. 9
70. 0
68. 5
60. B
61. 0
62. 9
59. 6
88. 1
79. 2
66. 6
65. 6
60. 2
60. 2
63. 0
35. 4
0. 0
78. 1
100. 0
0. 0
114. 4
62. 2
45. 3
13. 5
41. 5
83. 5
63. 1
41.5
37.3
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0020
TIME 20:33:05 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
6101 PARKS DEPT: PARKS/REC
. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 800. 00 19. 03 612. 01 O. 00 187. 99 76. 5
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 46, 676. 00 3, 890. 00 31, 120. 00 O. 00 15, 556. 00 66. 6
. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 109, 656. 00 8, 349. 18 77, 418. 04 1, 595. 23 . 30, 642. 73 72. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 340, 688. 00 25, 299. 24 189, 110. 88 1, 595. 23 149, 981.89 55. 9
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 340, 688. 00 25, 299. 24 189, 110. 88 1, 595. 23 149, 981. 89 55. 9
• 8145 UTIL UNDERGRND DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
i 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 10, 000. 00 O. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 . O. 00 10, 000. 00 O. 0
•
DIVISION TOTAL 10, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0
• DEPARTMENT TOTAL 10, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0
8608 YARD RELOCATION DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
•
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 21, 000. 00 O. 0
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 21, 000. 00 O. 0
• DIVISION TOTAL 21, 000. 00 0..00 O. 00 O. 00 21 , 000. 00 O. 0
8620 CC SOUND SYSTEM DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
•
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
. 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 0.00 0.00 384.30 0.00 384.30- O.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 384.30 0.00 384.30- O. 0
. 5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 22, 142. 00 15, 859. 53 15, 859. 53 O. 00 6, 282. 47 71. 6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL -22, 142. 00 - 15, 859. 53 15, 859. 53 O. 00 6, 282. 47 71. 6
•
DIVISION TOTAL 22, 142. 00 15, 859. 53 16, 243. 83 O. 00 5, 898. 17 73. 3
D DEPARTMENT TOTAL 43, 142. 00 15, 859. 53 16, 243. 83 O. 00 26, 898. 17 37. 6
111
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
0
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0021
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
001 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
8620 CC SOUND SYSTEM DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
10. 480, 198. 00
FUND TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
894. 730. 05
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
6. 478, 618. 21 49, 263. 56
3.952, 316.23 62.2
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•.
•
• '
•
•
•
•
®.
•
•
•
•
--• FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:00
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
----105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2601 STREET LIGHTING
10, 489. 00
10. 489. 00
10, 489. 00
10, 489. 00
DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL"CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4180 RETIREMENT
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4304 TELEPHONE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
103. 713. 00
100. 00
2, 098. 00
2, 098. 00
1. 175. 00
14, 124. 00
0. 00
15. 858. 00
896. 00
140. 062. 00
0. 00
8, 275. 00
8, 275. 00
150, 000. 00
200. 00
6. 100. 00
2, 800. 00
4, 350. 00
11, 302. 00
174, 752. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 323, 089.00
S DEPARTMENT TOTAL 323,089.00
8201 LT CONV/INSTALL DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES -
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 2,000.00
•
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
874. 08
874. 08
874. 08
874. 08
8. 838. 49
8. 35
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1. 395. 05
0. 00
2, 717. 76
56. 90
13, 016. 55
600. 51
0. 00
600. 51
11, 667. 98
7. 78
393. 17
86. 44
107. 46
942. 00
13, 204. 83
26, 821.89
26, 821.89
6,992.64
6,992.64
6,992.64
6,992.64
62, 171. 91
139. 54
0. 00
1, 162. 99
192. 10
7, 589. 11
11.91
11, 428. 21
712. 91
83, 408. 68
1,064.43
3,094.40
4,158.83
81, 803. 02
43. 84
6, 186. 40
893. 92
289. 14
7,536.00
96, 752. 32
184. 319. 83
184, 319. 83
0. 00 3, 367. 16
PAGE 0022
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. bo
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
906. 59
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
906. 59
906. 59
906. 59
0.00
3,496.36
3,496.36
3,496.36
3,496.36
41, 541. 09
39. 54-
2, 098. 00
935. 01
982. 90
6, 534. 89
11. 91-
4, 429. 79
183. 09
56. 653. 32
1, 064. 43-
5, 180. 60
4, 116. 17
68, 196. 98
156. 16
992. 99-
1, 906. 08
4, 060. 86
3, 766. 00
77, 093. 09
137, 862. 58
137, 862. 58
66.6
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
59. 9
139. 5
0. 0
55. 4
16. 3
53. 7
0. 0
72. 0
79. 5
59. 5
0. 0
37. 3
50. 2
54. 5
21. 9
116. 2
31. 9
6. 6
66. 6
55. 8
57. 3
57. 3
1,367.16- 168.3
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0023
TIME 20:33:05 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
8201 LT CONY/INSTALL DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
• 'i OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,000.00 0.00 3,367.16 0.00 1,367.16- 168.3
i 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
• 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 0.00 280.00 0.00 280.00- 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 280.00 0.00 280.00- 0.0
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,000.00 0. 00 3,126.69 0. 00 873. 31 78. 1
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4,000.00 0.00 3,126.69 0.00 873.31
5400 EQUIPMENT
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS. 19, 000. 00 0.00 1,562.66 • 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 000.00 0.00 1,562.66 0.00
DIVISION TOTAL 25, 000.00 0.00 8,336.51 0.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 25, 000. 00 0. 00 B. 336. 51 0. 00
FUND TOTAL 358, 578. 00 27, 695. 97 199, 648. 98 906. 59
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
i
17, 437. 34
17, 437. 34
16, 663. 49
16. 663. 49
158.022.43
78. 1
8. 2
8. 2
33. 3
33. 3
55. 9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'•
i•
•
•
•
•
•,
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:03
• FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
1, 160. 00
1, 160. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 1,160.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 160. 00
3301 DNTN ENHAN COMM DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFIT$
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4302 ADVERTISING
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4900 DEPRECIATION
4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP
4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8148 TRASH ENCLOSURE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
8, 353. 00
232. 00
232. 00
191. 00
268. 00
21. 00
9, 297. 00
51, 221. 00
51. 221. 00
7, 500. 00
200. 00
1, 200. 00
662. 00
9, 562. 00
400. 00
2, 145. 00
2, 545. 00
72. 625. 00
72, 625. 00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
750. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
96. 67
96. 67
96. 67
96. 67
543. 23
0. 00
0. 00
78. 30
86. 10
7. 87
715. 52
4,553.62
4,553.62
0. 00
16. 45
52. 50
55. 00
123. 95
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 393. 09
5, 393. 09
773. 36
773. 36
773. 36
773. 36
4,779.34
3,335.39
0.00
522. 63
409. 45
136. 74
9, 183. 55
26, 428. 46
26, 428. 46
0. 00
83. 05
211. 01
440. 00
734. 06
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
36, 346. 07
36, 346. 07
0. 00 340. 00
PAGE 0024
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
386. 64
386. 64
386. 64
386. 64
3,573.66
3,103.39-
232.00
,103.39-
232.00
331.637
141.
31.63-
141. 45-
115. 74-
113. 45
24, 792. 54
24, 792. 54
7,500.00
116. 95
988. 99
222. 00
8,827.94
400. 00
2, 145. 00
2, 545. 00
36, 278. 93
36, 278. 93
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
57.2
1437. 6
0. 0
273. 6
152.7
651. 1
98. 7
51. 5
51. 5
0. 0
41. 5
17. 5
66. 4
7. 6
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
50. 0
50. 0
410. 00 45. 3
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
s
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND
8148 TRASH ENCLOSURE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0025
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 750.00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8701 PKG LOT IMPROV
36, 250. 00
36, 250. 00
37, 000. 00
37, 000. 00
DEPT: OTHER PROJECTS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
20, 000. 00
20, 000. 00
20, 000. 00
20, 000. 00
130, 785. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
15, 180. 65
15, 180. 65
15, 180. 65
15, 180. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
20, 670. 41
340. 00
15, 180. 65
15, 180. 65
15, 520. 65
15, 520. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
52, 640. 08
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE.
0. 00 410. 00 45. 3
0. 00 21 , 069. 35 41. 8
0. 00 21 , 069. 35 41. 8
0. 00 21, 479. 35 41. 9
0. 00 21, 479. 35 41. 9
0. 00
0. 00
20, 000. 00 0. 0
20, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 78, 144. 92 40. 2
•
•
i !•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
' FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
110 PARKING FUND
1204 FINANCE CASHIER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4180 RETIREMENT
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL -
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LURES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
162, 205. 00 12, 471. 47 107, 238. 83
1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00
3, 090. 00 0. 00 997. 32
3, 090. 00 0. 00 1, 359. 34
0. 00 322. 50 322. 50
21, 550. 00 1, 956. 86 10. 462. 07
0. 00 19. 99 19. 99
19, 292. 00 2, 979. 72 12, 240. 72
1, 389. 00 94. 94 723. 09
21.1, 616. 00 17, 845. 48 133, 363. 86
16, 165.00 1,369.18 3,954.38
16, 165.00 1.369.18 3,954.38
2, 500. 00 173. 74 1, 320. 98
29, 838. 00 6, 386. 14 16, 981. 76
106. 00 11. 06 63. 95
150. 00 0. 00 17. 98
75. 00 0. 00 0. 00
1, 037. 00 0. 00 899. 68
7, 439. 00 620. 00 4, 960. 00
41, 145. 00 7, 190. 94 24, 244. 35
300. 00 0. 00
300. 00 0. 00
269, 226. 00 26, 405. 60
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
954, 143. 00
954, 143. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 954, 143. 00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1.223, 369. 00
70, 194. 34
70, 194. 34
70, 194. 34
96. 599. 94
PAGE 0026
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
552. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
552. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
161, 562.59 552.00
673, 365. 72
673, 365. 72
673, 365. 72
834, 928. 31
54, 966. 17
1,000.00
2,092.68
1,730.66
322.50-
11,087.93
22.50-
11,087.93
19.99-
7,051.28
9.99-
7,051.28
665. 91
78, 252. 14
12, 210. 62
12, 210. 62
1, 179. 02
12, 304. 24
42. 05
132. 02
75. 00
137. 32
2, 479. 00
16, 348. 65
66. 1
0. 0
32. 2
43. 9
0. 0
48. 5
0. 0
63. 4
52. 0
63. 0
24. 4
24. 4
52. 8
58. 7
60. 3
11. 9
0. 0
86. 7
66. 6
60. 2
300. 00 0. 0
300. 00 0. 0
107, 111.41 60.2
0. 00 280, 777. 28
0. 00 280, 777. 28
0. 00 280, 777. 28
552. 00 387, 888. 69
70. 5
70.5
70. 5
68. 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
110 PARKING FUND
3302 PARKING ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4180 RETIREMENT • •
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4900 DEPRECIATION
4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP
4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES
4903 DEPRECIATION/ELDGS
4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
205, 122. 00
17, 147. 00
5, 000. 00
6, 649. 00
6, 649. 00
96, 998. 00
4, 000. 00
37, 152. 00
8, 523. 00
4, 359. 00
28, 215. 00
4, 016. 00
423, 830. 00
850. 00
850. 00
4, 000. 00
27, 661. 00
3, 700. 00
4, 800. 00
6, 000. 00
9, 000. 00
75. 00
52, 768. 00
108, 004. 00
5, 320. 00
7, 420. 00
560. 00
700. 00
14, 000. 00
839. 00
45, 600. 00
46, 439. 00
593, 123. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
8,583.36 134, 793. 64
1,469.10 11, 716.80
410.44 6,499.48
108.49 4,961.08
787. 55 5,698.97
3,951.00 43, 436.34
245.31 1,943.05
2,532.09 15, 264. 03
157.48 2,338.69
100. 72 2,297.02
4,442.87 20, 974. 89
113.36 1,102.62
22, 901. 77 251,026.61
400. 65
400. 65
343. 95
5,644.67
239. 50
5. 12
253. 78
2, 125. 61
0. 00
4,397.00
13, 009. 63
0. 00
0.00--
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
312. 56
0.00
312. 56
663. 30
663. 30
1, 687. 34
11, 230. 45
1, 916. 00
1, 433. 64
3, 363. 65
4, 810. 97
0. 00
35, 176. 00
59, 618. 05
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
312. 56
0.00
312. 56
36, 624. 61 311, 620.52
PAGE 0027
DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
3, 976. 30
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
32. 50
0. 00
0. 00
4, 008. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 008. 80
70, 328. 36
5,430.20
1,499.48-
1,687.92 ,499.48-
1,687.92
950. 03
53, 561.66
2,056.95
21, 887. 97
6, 184. 31
2.061. 98
7,240.11
2,913.38
172, 803. 39
186.70
106. 70
2,312.66
12, 454. 25
1,784.00
3,366.36
2,636.35
4,156.53
75. 00
17, 592. 00
44, 377.15
5, 320. 00
7, 420. 00
560. 00
700. 00
14, 000. 00
526. 44
45, 600. 00
46, 126. 44
277, 493. 68
65. 7
68. 3
129. 9
74. 6
85. 7
44. 7
48. 5
41.0
27. 4
52. 6
74. 3
27. 4
59. 2
78. 0
78. 0
42. 1
54. 9
51. 7
29. 8
56. 0
53. 8
0. 0
66. 6
58. 9
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
37. 2
0. 0
0. 6
53. 2
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
/AA
•
•:,
•
-=- -FINANCE-FA434
TIME 20:33:03
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
---110 -STATE--GAS-TAX--FUND-.-----
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
111
a
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE -SUMMARY REPORT -ABY FUND) PAGE 0028 -
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
-. 593, 123. 00 • 36, 624. 61
1, 816, 492. 00 133, 224. 55
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
31 1, 620. 52 4, 008. 80
1, 146, 548. 83 4, 560. 80
277, 493. 68 53. 2
665, 382. 37 63. 3
•
•
--n�•
•
•
•
•
•
9
9
9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
=
I
FINANCE-FA434
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
----115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0029
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
434, 391. 00
434, 391. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 434, 391.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 434, 391.00
8137 VALLEY ARDMORE DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
65, 000. 00
65, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 65, 000.00
8141 ST REHABILITATN DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
11, 888. 00
172. 00
12, 060. 00
112, 940. 00
112, 940. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
36, 199. 25
36, 199. 25
36. 199. 25
36, 199. 25
0. 00
0.00
0.00
39. 76
0. 00
39. 76
0.00
0.00
125, 000.00 39.76
8142 SIDEWALK REPAIR DEPT: STREET/SAFETY-
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0. 00
35, 000. 00
35, 000. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
35, 000. 00 0. 00
289, 594. 00
289, 594. 00
289, 594. 00
289, 594. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00 144, 797. 00
0. 00 144, 797. 00
0. 00 144, 797. 00
0. 00 144, 797. 00
0. 00 . 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
65, 000. 00
65, 000. 00
0. 00 0. 00 65, 000. 00
685. 58
0. 00
685. 58
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
685. 58 0. 00
76. 86
76. 86
0. .00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
76. 86 0. 00
11, 202. 42
172. 00
11,374.42
112, 940. 00
112, 940. 00
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
5. 7
0. 0
5. 6
0. 0
0. 0
124, 314. 42 0. 5
76. 86- 0. 0
76. 86- 0. 0
35, 000. 00
35, 000. 00
34, 923. 14
0. 0
0. 0
O. 2
•
0
l•
•
•
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
0
0
- FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
8144 STRAND WALL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
• 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
22, 850. 00
680. 00
0. 00
23. 530. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
3, 508. 90
0. 00
0. 00
3, 508. 90
37, 193. 82
671. 49
374. 00
38, 239. 31
544, 620.00 92, 875.60 391, 421.84
• -544,620.00 - - 92,875.60. -391.421.84
• 25. 00
2, 500. 00
2, 525. 00
570, 675. 00
8146 MEDIAN UPGRADE DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
8147 HANDICAP CURDS DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
72, 240. 00
72, 240. 00
72. 240. 00
8178 CTR MONUMENTS DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
18, 000. 00
18, 000. 00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,000.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
96, 384. 50
20. 52
1, 320. 33
1, 340. 85
431, 002. 00
PAGE 0030
DATE 03/14/94
66.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00-
0. 00
410. 16
410. 16
410. 16
14,343.82-
8.51
4,343.82-
8.51
374.00-
14,709.31-
153,198.16
74.00-
14,709.31-
153,198.16
153, 198. 16
4. 48
769. 51
773. 99
139, 262. 84
i
162. 7
98. 7
0. 0
162. 5
71. 8
71.8
82. 0
69. 2
69. 3
75. 5
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 72.240. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 72.240. 00 0. 0
0.00 0. 00 0. 00 72,240. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 18, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0.'00 0. 00 18, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 4, 000. 00 0. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
fir
0
•
•
. FINANCE=FA454
TIME 20:33:05
• FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
115 STATE CAS TAX FUND
• 8178 CTR MONUMENTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
i
0
0
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0031
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4,000.00
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EOUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
8, 000. 00
8, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 30,000.00
8180 MISC TR SIGNALS DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0. 00
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00 -
15, 000.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 922, 915.00
FUND TOTAL 1,357.306.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
96, 424. 26
132, 623. 51
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
1,469.92
1,469.92
0. 00
0. 00
3,339.52
3,339.52
9,763.07
9,763.07
14, 572. 51
446. 336. 95
735. 930. 95
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
O. 00
410. 16
410. 16
4, 000. 00 0. 0
8, 000. 00
8, 000. 00
0. 0
0. 0
30, 000. 00 0. 0
1,469.92-
1,469.92-
15,
,469.92-
1,469.92-
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
3,339.52-
3,339.52-
9,
,339.52-
3,339.52-
9, 763. 07-
9, 763. 07-
427. 49
476, 167. 89
620, 964. 89
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
97. 1
48. 4
54. 2
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
•
•
•
•
•
•
. FINANCE-FA434
TIME 20:33:0,
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND
8141 ST REHABILITATN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0032
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/26/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
• DEPARTMENT TOTAL
• FUND TOTAL
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
1
1
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
. FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0033
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
8506 PRK, REC IMPROV DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL.
DIVISION TOTAL
265. 00
265. 00
19, 510. 00
19, 510. 00
225. 00
225. 00
0. 00 263. 22
0. 00 263. 22
490. 00
490. 00
3, 590. 00
3, 590. 00
0. 00 222. 05
0. 00 222. 05
20, 000. 00 490. 00
8508 PK IRRIG IMPRV DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
19, 888. 00
63. 00
19.951. 00
9, 149. 00
9, 149. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
29, 100. 00 0. 00
8509 TENNIS CT REHAB DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
750. 00
225. 00
- 975. 00
21, 785. 00
21, 785. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 031. 00
2, 031. 00
0. 00 1 . 78
0. 00 1 . 78
1, 850. 00
1, 850. 00
14, 070. 00
14, 070. 00
0. 00 2. 95
0. 00 2. 95
4, 075. 27 1, 850. 00
903. 32
0.00
903. 32
7,213.00
7,213.00
6,409.99
6,409.99
14, 526. 31
1, 076. 98
221. 00
1, 297. 98
20, 310. 00
20, 310. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
99. 3
99. 3
27. 8
27.8
98. 6
98. 6
14, 074.73 29.6
18, 984. 68 4. 5
63. 00 0. 0
19, 047. 68 4. 5
1, 936. 00 78. 8
1 , 936. 00 78. 8
6, 409. 99- 0. 0
6, 409. 99- 0. 0
14, 573.69 49.9
326.98-
4.00
26.98-
4.00
322.98-
1, 475. 00
1, 475. 00
143. 5
98. 2
133. 1
93. 2
93. 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
' FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0034 .
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
DIVISION TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
22, 760. 00 2, 031. 00
8511 GREENBELT LDSCP DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
2, 000. 00
2, 000. 00
6, 394. 00
6, 394. 00
8, 394. 00
8513 RODAWAY PARK DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1, 000. 00
0. 00
1, 000. 00
55, 900. 00
55, 900. 00
56, 900. 00
8515 SO SCHOOL PARK DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
8520 CLARK FIELD IMP
1, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
99, 000. 00
99, 000. 00
100, 000. 00
DEPT: PARKS
0.00
0. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
21, 607. 98 0. 00
2,280.18
2,280.18
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 3, 598. 54 2, 515. 00
0. 00 3, 598. 54 2, 515. 00
0. 00 5, 878. 72 2, 515. 00
689. 37 1 , 193. 49 0. 00
0. 00 221. 00 0. 00
689. 37 1, 414. 49 0. 00
9, 342. 00 12, 792. 00 0. 00
9, 342. 00 12, 792. 00 0. 00
10, 031. 37 14, 206. 49 0. 00
0. 00 969. 00 0. 00
0. 00 969. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0.00 969.00 0.00
1 , 152. 02 94. 9
280. 18-
280. 18-
280. 46
280. 46
0. 28
193. 49-
221.00-
414.49-
43,108.00
21.00-
414.49-
43,108.00
43, 108. 00
42, 693. 51
114.0
114.0
95. 6
95. 6
99. 9
119.3
0. 0
141. 4
22. 8
22. 8
24. 9
31.00 96.9
31.,00 96.9
99, 000. 00
99, 000. 00
99, 031. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 9, 742. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9, 742. 00 0. 0 •
•
•
•
• ..
•
•
•
•
•
•
. FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
9, 742. 00 0. 00
9, 742. 00 0. 00
8523 BILTMORE SITE DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
• DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8604 VAR BLDG IMPRV
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
I
0. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
37, 000. 00
37. 000. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
16, 165. 00
16, 165. 00
0. 00 50. 99
0. 00 50. 99
38, 000. 00
284, 896. 00
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 15,000.00
8616 EARTHOK REINFOR DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0. 00
45, 000. 00
45, 000. 00
45, 000. 00
16, 215. 99
28, 768. 36
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
292. 46
306. 00
598. 46
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
16, 226. 32 0. 00
16, 226. 32 0. 00
50.99 • O. 00
50. 99 0. 00
16, 875. 77 0. 00
78, 139. 54 4, 365. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
486. 78 0. 00
486. 78 0. 00
0.. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
486. 78 0. 00
9, 742. 00 0. 0
9, 742. 00 0. 0
292.46-
694.00
92.46-
694.00
401. 54
20, 773. 68
20, 773. 68
50. 99-
50. 99-
21, 124. 23
202, 391. 46
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
486.78-
486.78-
45,
86.78-
486.78-
45, 000. 00
45, 000. 00
44, 513. 22
0.0
30. 6
59. 8
43. 8
43. 8
0.0
0. 0
44. 4
28. 9
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
1. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
a
----;- FINANCE-FA484
• TIME 20:33:0
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0036
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
• FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
125 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
• 8616 EARTHGK REINFOR DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
•
i,7.!
DEPARTMENT- TOTAL- 60.-000-00 0. 00 486.78- -__._.._ ....._ -59,513.22--
n
• FUND TOTAL 344, 896. 00 28, 768. 36 78, 626. 32 4, 365. 00 261, 904. 68 24. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
s
•
•
I;. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0037
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
8514 PORCH ATSF RROW DEPT: PARKS
•
•
•
•
•
• 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES •
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 200. 00 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 2, 200. 00 0. 0
• 6700 INTEREST •
6700 INTEREST O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0.0
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 •
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
• 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 617, 193.00 129, 832.55 600, 752.39 0.00 16, 440.61 97.3 •
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 617, 193. 00 129, 832. 55 600, 752. 39 0. 00 16, 440. 61 97. 3
• DIVISION TOTAL 619, 393. 00 129, 832. 55 600, 752. 39 0. 00 18, 640. 61 96. 9 •
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 619, 393. 00 129, 832. 55 600, 752. 39 0. 00 18, 640. 61 96. 9 •
•
FUND TOTAL 619, 393.00 129, 832.55 600, 752.39 0.00 18, 640.61 96.9
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• J.
•
•
, FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
• FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND
• 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0038
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/26/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
1, 336, 779. 00
1, 336, 779.00
1, 336, 779. 00
1, 336, 779. 00
1, 336, 779. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
111, 398. 25
111, 398. 25
111,398.25
111, 398. 25
111, 398. 25
891, 186. 00
891, 186. 00
891, 186. 00
891, 186. 00
891, 186. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
445, 593. 00
445, 593. 00
445, 593. 00
445, 593. 00
445, 593. 00
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0039
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF.
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
1, 851. 00
0. 00 -
1. 851. 00
12, 000. 00
12, 000.. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 13, 851.00
3403 FUND EXCHANGE DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 170,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 170, 000.00
DIVISION TOTAL 170,000.00
• 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
• 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1,480.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,480.00
. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 10,400.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 400.00
•
DIVISION TOTAL 11, 880.00
411 3409 REC TRANSPTN DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
• 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1,877.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,877.00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 17,000.00
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 000.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
908. 00
0. 00
908. 00
850. 00
B50. 00
1, 758. 00
0.00
0.00
1, 234. 68
63. 67
1, 298. 35
3,261.00
5, 261. 00
6, 559. 35
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
124. 53
124. 53
1, 014. 03
1, 014. 03
0.00 0.00
O. 00 0. 00
124. 53 1, 014. 03
157. 12
157. 12
1,253.95
1,253.95
1, 283. 02
1, 283. 02
8, 684. 91
8, 684. 91
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
616. 32
63.67-
552.65
3.67-
552.65
806. 00 5, 933. 00
806. 00 5, 933. 00
806. 00 6, 485. 65
• 0. 00 170, 000. 00
0. 00 170, 000. 00
0. 00 170, 000. 00
0. 00 465. 97
0. 00 465. 97
0. 00 10, 400. 00
0. 00 10, 400. 00
0. 00 10, 865. 97
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
593. 98
593. 98
8, 315. 09
8, 315. 09
66. 7
0. 0
70. 1
50. 5
50. 5
53. 1
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
68. 5
68. 5
0. 0
0. 0
8. 5
68. 3
68. 3
51. 0
51. 0
41
•
411
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
1
1
i
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
3409 REC TRANSPTN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4326 PRIOR YEAR EXPENSE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00 0. 00 607. 50
0.00 0.00 607. 50
18, 877. 00
214, 608.00
214, 608. 00
1,411.07
3,293.60
3,293.60
10, 575. 43
18, 148. 81
18, 148. 81
PAGE 0040
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
806. 00
806. 00
•
607. 50-
607. 50-
6,301.57
0-
8,301.57
195, 653.19
195, 653. 19
0. 0
0. 0
56. 0
8. 8
8. 8
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0041
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
• FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
146 PROPOSITION 'C TRANSIT FUND
• 3401 DIAL A RIDE DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
• 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 25, 145.00 1,634.15 16, 012.65
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 145.00 1,634.15 16, 012.65
• 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 170, 800. 00 39, 562. 39 85, 597. 80
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 170, 800.00 39, 562.39 85, 597.80
a•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4326 PRIOR YEAR EXPENSE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8141 ST REHABILITATN
50. 00
500. 00
0. 00
550. 00
196, 495. 00
196, 495. 00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
100, 000. 00
100, 000. 00
100, 000. 00
100, 000. 00
296, 495. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
152. 07
607. 50-
455. 43-
41, 196. 54 101, 155. 02
41, 196. 54
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
41, 196. 54
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
101, 155. 02 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
101, 155. 02
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
9,132.35
9,132.35
85, 202. 20
85, 202. 20
50. 00
347. 93
607. 50
1, 005. 43
63. 6
63. 6
50. 1
50. 1
0. 0
30. 4
0. 0
82. 8
95, 339.98 51.4
95, 339.98 51.4
100, 000. 00
100, 000. 00
100, 000. 00
100, 000. 00
195, 339. 98
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
O. 0
34. 1
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
•
- FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
150 GRANT FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0042
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
0. 00
0. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 0.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3701 EMISSION CNTL
0.00
DEPT: OTHER TRANSPRTN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8151 TRAFF ENG PROG
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8522 FORESTRY GRANT
19, 865. 00
19, 865. 00
19, 865. 00
19, 865. 00
DEPT: PARKS
. 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
. 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
111
0.00
0.00
17, 600. 00
0. 00
17, 600. 00
17, 600. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
17, 600. 00
0. 00
17, 600. 00
17, 600. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
19, 865. 00
19, 865. 00
19, 865. 00
19, 865. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
100. 0
0. 0
100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
. •
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
0
•
0
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0043
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
• FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
r
150 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
8522 FORESTRY GRANT DEPT: PARKS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 17, 600.00 0.00 17, 600.00 0.00 0.00 100.0
FUND TOTAL 37, 465.00 0.00 17, 600.00 0.00 19, 865.00 46.9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
• TIME 20:33:05 FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
152 AIR DUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
3701 EMISSION CNTL DEPT: OTHER TRANSPRTN
• 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 2, 373. 00 205. 82 1, 721. 58
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 66.00 2.62 19. 34
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 439. 00 208. 44 1, 740. 92
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00
• 4327 AGMD INCENTIVES 2, 200. 00 105. 00 1, 264. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 700. 00 105. 00 1, 264. 00
• 5400 EQUIPMENT
5403 VEHICLES 30, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 35, 539. 00 313. 44 3, 024. 92
DEPARTMENT TOTAL. 35, 539. 00 313. 44 3, 024. 92
• FUND TOTAL 35, 539. 00 313. 44 3, 024. 92
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
9
i
0
PAGE 0044
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
651. 42 72. 5
46. 66 29. 3
698. 08 71. 3
500. 00 0. 0
916. 00 58. 3
1, 416. 00 47. 5
30, 400. 00 0. 0
30, 400. 00 0. 0
32, 514. 08 8. 5
32, 514. 08 B. 5
32, 514. 08 8. 5
•
•
•
6
�'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
I
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0045
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2102 CROSSING GUARD
1,018.00
1, 018. 00
1,018.00
1, 018, 00
DEPT: POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4113 CROSSING GUARDS
4180 RETIREMENT
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY (F I C A)
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
0. 00
5, 716. 00
204. 00
204. 00
46, 903. 00
1, 588. 00
2, 237. 00
1, 200. 00
540. 00
620. 00
59, 212. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
50. 00
4, 001. 00
4, 051. 00
64, 263. 00
64, 263. 00
65, 281. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
84. 83
84. 83
84. 83
84. 83
0. 00
489. 70
0. 00
0. 00
6, 860. 03
65. 35
361. 91
0. 00
63. 64
84. 65
7, 925. 28
678. 64
678. 64
678. 64
676.64
397. 00
3, 905. 60
3, 335. 16
0. 00
34, 295. 82
376. 02
2, 062. 96
668. 08
315. 65
482. 48
45, 838. 77
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
339. 36
339. 36
339. 36
339. 36
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
0. 00 397. 00- 0. 0
0. 00 1, 810. 40 68. 3
0. 00 3, 131. 16- 1634. 8
0. 00 204. 00 0. 0
0. 00 12, 607. 18 73. 1
0. 00 1 , 21 1 . 98 23. 6
0. 00 174. 04 92. 2
0. 00 531. 92 55. 6
0. 00 224. 35 58. 4
0. 00 137. 52 77. 8
0. 00 13, 373. 23 77. 4
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00
333. 00
333. 00
B. 258. 28
8, 258. 28
8, 343. 11
41. 69
2, 664. 00
2, 705. 69
48, 544. 46
48, 544. 46
49, 223. 10
0. 00 8. 31 83. 3
0. 00 1, 337. 00 • 66. 5
0. 00 1, 345. 31 66. 7
0. 00 15, 718. 54 75. 5
0. 00 15, 718. 54 75. 5
0. 00 16, 057. 90 75. 4
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
0
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
1
1
i
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
160 SEWER FUND
3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4180 RETIREMENT
4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A)
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL.
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/QOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 1500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8301 MISC ST DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
100, 782. 00
2, 100. 00
2, 049. 00
2, 049. 00
1, 700. 00
13, 800. 00
0..00
11, 321. 00
766. 00
134, 567. 00
2, 100. 00
3, 418. 00
5, 518. 00
800. 00
10, 800. 00
1, 000. 00
2, 500. 00
15, 533. 00
30, 633. 00
0.00
0.00
170, 718. 00
170, 718. 00
DEPT: STORM DRAIN
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
1, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
49, 000. 00
49, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
8, 363. 09
352. 94
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 169. 31
0. 00
1, 723. 68
64. 56
1 1, 673. 58
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
88. 36
26. 14
51. 72
292. 06
1, 294. 00
1, 752. 28
0.00
0.00
13, 425. 86
13, 425. 86
0.00
0.00
64, 265. 08
2, 377. 71
0. 00
1, 678. 08
288. 15
6, 414. 50
17. 87
7, 378. 04
703. 35
83, 122. 78
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
655. 90
2, 681. 80
427. 03
945. 28
10, 352. 00
15, 062. 01
97. 41
97. 41
98, 282. 20
98, 282. 20
170. 00
170. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
PAGE 0046
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
36, 516. 92
277.71-
2,049.00
77.71-
2,049.00
370. 92
1, 411. 85
7,385.50
17.87-
3,942.96
7.87-
3,942.96
62. 65
51, 444. 22
2, 100. 00
3, 418. 00
5, 518. 00
144. 10
8, 118. 20
572. 97
1,554.72
5, 181. 00
15, 570. 99
97.41-
7.41-
97.41-
97.41-
72,
72, 435. 80
72, 435. 80
830. 00
830. 00
49, 000. 00
49, 000. 00
i
63. 7
113. 2
O. 0
81. 8
16. 9
46. 4
O. 0
65. 1
91. 8
61. 7
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
81. 9
24. 8
42. 7
37. 8
66. 6
49. 1
0. 0
0. 0
57. 5
57. 5
17. 0
17. 0
0. 0
0. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
160 SEWER FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
8302 NPDES IMPROVE DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
.4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
• DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
• 8408 SEWER IMPROVEMN
•
•
•
•
•
s
•
S
a
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
50, 000. 00
STORM DRAIN
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
64, 900. 00
64, 900. 00
0. 00
0. 00
100. 00
100. 00
65, 000. 00
115, 000. 00
DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
12, 735. 00
185. 00
12, 920. 00
2, 387, 080. 00
2, 387, 080. 00
2, 400, 000. 00
2, 400, 000. 00
2, 685, 718. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
1, 452. 85
0. 00
1, 452. 85
55. 27
55. 27
1, 508. 12
1,508.12
14, 933. 98
170. 00
2, 647. 28
391. 00
3, 038. 28
5. 50
5. 50
21. 63
470. 24
131. 16
623. 03
3, 666. 81
3, 836. 81
4, 037. 06
0. 00
4, 037. 06
2, 758. 27
2, 758. 27
6, 795. 33
6,795.33
108, 914. 34
k,
- PAGE ---------0047 T.4.
DATE 03/14/94 :.
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE'/_�&
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
3, 725. 00
3, 725. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 725. 00
3, 725. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 725. 00
49, 830. 00
2,647.28-
391.00-
3,038.28-
61,169.50
,647.28-
391.00-
3,038.28-
61,169.50
61, 169. 50
21.63-
470.24-
31.16-
523.037
57,
1.63-
470.24-
31.16-
523.03-
57, 608. 19
107, 438. 19
8, 697. 94
185. 00
8, 882. 94
2, 384, 321. 73
2, 384, 321. 73
2, 393, 204. 67
2, 393, 204. 67
2, 573, 078. 66
0. 3
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
5. 7
5. 7
0. 0
0. 0
131. 1
623. 0
11. 3
6. 5
31. 7
0.0
31.2
0. 1
0. 1
0. 2
0. 2
4. 1
•
•
O
•
•
•
a
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS
14, 011. 00
14, 011. 00
14, 011.00
14, 011.00
DEPT: POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY
4107 PREMIUM -OVERTIME
4109 COURT TIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4322 UNCLASSIFIED
4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS
OBJECT. SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
216, 358. 00
9, 240. 00
35, 600. 00
1, 000. 00
4, 190. 00
4, 190. 00
56, 585. 00
3, 350. 00
12, 757. 00
2, 035. 00
345, 305. 00
2. 000. 00
2, 000. 00
7, 093. 00
6, 000. 00
2, 200. 00
1, 500. 00
700. 00
2, 480. 00
27, 376. 00
47, 349. 00
60, 911. 00
60, 911. 00
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 38,805.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1, 167. 58
1, 167. 58
1, 167. 58
1, 167. 58
6, 766. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 004. 71
54. 16
1, 340. 15
0. 00
11, 165. 02
0.00
0.00
192. 54
138. 33
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 000. 00
2. 281. 00
5, 611. 87
0.00
0.00
0.00
9, 340. 64
9, 340. 64
9, 340. 64
9, 340. 64
91,632.64
2,310.00
12. 579. 31
293. 64
0. 00
3,547.20
25, 312.11
1,016.68
8,058.18
1,097.55
145, 847. 31
350. 66
350. 66
2, 137. 54
2, 280. 59
1, 176. 78
0. 00
677. 08
3, 040. 00
18, 248. 00
27, 559. 99
9, 159. 51
9, 159. 51
38, 805. 13
PAGE 0048
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
4, 670. 36
4, 670. 36
4, 670. 36
4. 670. 36
124, 725. 36
6,930.00
23, 020. 69
706. 36
4,190.00
642. 80
31, 272. 89
2,333.32
4,698.82
937. 45
199, 457. 69
1,649.34
1,649.34
4, 955. 46
3, 719. 41
1, 023. 22
1, 500. 00
22. 92
560. 00-
9. 128. 00
19, 789. 01
51, 751. 49
51,751.49
0. 13-
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
66. 6
42. 3
25. 0
35. 3
29. 3
0. 0
84. 6
44. 7
30. 3
63. 1
53. 9
42. 2
17. 5
17. 5
30. 1
38. 0
53. 4
0. 0
96. 7
122. 5
66. 6
58. 2
15. 0
15. 0
100. 0
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8619 PD REMODEL III
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0049
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
38, 805. 00 0. 00
494, 370. 00
494, 370. 00
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL.
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVA.TE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
363, 368. 00
363, 368. 00
0.00
0.00
363, 368. 00
363, 368. 00
871, 749. 00
16, 776. 89
16, 776. 89
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
17, 944. 47
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
38, 805. 13 0. 00
221, 722. 60
221,722.60
871. 81
41. 08
912. 89
306, 395. 00
306, 395. 00
49. 41
49. 41
307, 357. 30
307, 357. 30
538, 420. 54
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1,176.50
1, 176. 50
•
0. 13- 100. 0
272, 647. 40
272, 647. 40
871.81-
41.08-
912.89-
55,
71.81-
41.08-
912.89-
55, 796. 50
55, 796. 50
0. 00 49. 41-
0. 00 49. 41-
1, 176. 50
1, 176. 50
1, 176. 50
54, 834. 20
54, 834. 20
332, 151. 96
44. 8
44. 8
0. 0
O. 0
0. 0
84. 6
84. 6
0. 0
0. 0
84. 9
84. 9
61.8
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
fa
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
O
.-FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
•'j FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
-180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND
•!
•.
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0050
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.0X OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 39, 772.00 3,314.33 26, 514.64
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 39, 772.00 3,314.33 26, 514.64
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
0.00
0.00
13, 257. 36
13, 257. 36
66. 6
66. 6
DIVISION TOTAL 39, 772.00 3,314.33 26, 514.64 0.00 13, 257.36 66.6
• DEPARTMENT TOTAL 39,772.00 3,314.33 26, 514.64 0.00 13, 257.36 66.6
• 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE DEPT: FIRE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
• 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 100, 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100, 000.00 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 100, 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100, 000.00 0.0
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
• 4326 PRIOR YEAR EXPENSE O. 00 O. 00 77, 633. 00 O. 00 77, 633. 00- O. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL O. 00 O. 00 77, 633. 00 O. 00 77, 633. 00- O. 0
•
DIVISION TOTAL 100, 000.00 0.00 77, 633.00 0.00 22, 367.00 77.6
• DEPARTMENT TOTAL . 100, 000. 00 0. 00 77, 633. 00 0. 00 22, 367. 00 77. 6
40 FUND TOTAL 139, 772.00 3,314.33 104, 147.64 0.00 35, 624.36 74.5
•
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
I
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
•
705 -INSURANCE FUND ---
• a 1209 LIABILITY INS
9
0
40"
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0051
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94 DATE 03/14/94
66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
24, 791. 00
496. 00
496. 00
3, 338. 00
2, 904. 00
32, 025. 00
348, 900. 00
348, 900. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
2, 004. 24 16, 376. 15
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 796. 88
269. 89 1, 526. 08
477. 30 2, 114. 43
2, 751. 43 20, 813. 54
•
5, 250. 50 345, 647. 98
5, 250. 50 345, 647. 98
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00 8, 414. 85 66. 0
0.00 496.00 0.0
0. 00 300.88- 160.6
0. 00 1, 81 1. 92 45. 7
0. 00 789. 37 72. 8
0. 00 1 1 , 21 1. 46 64. 9
0. 00 3, 252. 02 99. 0
0. 00 3, 252. 02 99. 0
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 380. 00 22. 14 224. 37 0. 00 155. 63 59. 0
4315 MEMBERSHIP . 250. 00 0. 00 248. 00 0. 00 2. 00 99. 2
4316 TRAINING 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 0
4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 100, 000. 00 2, 186. 20 53, 755. 43 0. 00 46, 244. 57. 53. 7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 100, 830. 00 2, 208. 34 54, 227. 80 0. 00 46, 602. 20 53. 7
DIVISION TOTAL 481, 755. 00
1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
.OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
26, 450. 00
26. 450. 00
29, 707. 00
29, 707. 00
10, 210. 27 420, 689. 32
946. 00
946. 00
0. 00
0. 00
56, 157. 00 946. 00
1215 UNEMPLOYMENT • DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
25, 000. 00
25, 000. 00
0. 00
0. 00
25, 000. 00 - 0. 00
19, 074. 00
19, 074. 00
14, 706. 85
14, 706. 85
33, 780. 85
15, 040. 00
15, 040. 00
15, 040. 00
0. 00 61, 065. 68 87. 3
0. 00
0. 00
2, 069. 57
2, 069. 57
2, 069. 57
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
7, 376. 00 72. 1
7, 376. 00 72. 1
12, 930. 58 56. 4
12, 930. 58 56. 4
20, 306. 58 63. 8
9, 960. 00 60. 1
9, 960. 00 60. 1
9, 960. 00 60. 1
•
•
•
1,40
:1
�1•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
41
a
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• FINANCE-FA454
TIME 20:33:05
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
705 INSURANCE FUND
1217 WORKERS COMP
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 02/01/94 TO 02/28/94
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
31, 592. 00
632. 00
632. 00
4, 254. 00
300, 000. 00
4, 870. 00
341, 980.. 00
47, 500. 00
2, 000. 00
49, 500. 00
400. 00
50. 00
1, 400. 00
1, 850. 00
393, 330. 00
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS
85, 000. 00
85, 000. 00
85, 000. 00
1, 041, 242. 00
1, 041, 242. 00
21, 842, 296. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
2, 571. 02 20, 212. 83
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 796. 88
308. 05 1, 936. 61
46, 048. 41 185, 069. 81
729. 62 3, 217. 64
49, 657. 10 211, 233. 77
8, 000. 00 36, 454. 00
0. 00 1, 605. 13
8, 000. 00 38, 059. 13
78. 43
0. 00
0. 00
78. 43
57, 735. 53
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
68, 891. 80
68, 891.80
1, 637, 174. 92
562. 59
0. 00
354. 95
917. 54
250, 210. 44
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
719, 720. 61
719, 720. 61
11, 844, 306. 74
PAGE 0052
DATE 03/14/94
66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 069. 57
2, 069. 57
67, 283. 18
11, 379. 17
632. 00
164. 88-
2, 317. 39
114, 930. 19
1, 652. 36
130, 746. 23
11, 046. 00
394. 87
1 1, 440. 87
162. 59-
50. 00
1, 045. 05
932. 46
143, 119. 56
85, 000. 00
85, 000. 00
85, 000. 00
319, 451. 82
319, 451. 82
9, 930, 706. 08
63. 9
0. 0
126. 0
45. 5
61. 6
66. 0
61. 7
76. 7
80. 2
76. 8
140. 6
0. 0
25. 3
49. 5
63. 6
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
69. 3
69. 3
54. 5
Ib
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
S
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TREASURER'S REPORT - FEBRUARY 1994
FUND GENERAL 2/1/94 CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 2/28/94
NUMBER ACCOUNT BALANCE BALANCE
001
105
109
110
115
120
125
126
127
145
146
150
152
155
160
170
180
705
**
**
GENERAL $2,246,628.32 $604,417.48 $241,228.45 ($968,491.15) ($178,087.95) $1,945,695.15
LIGHTING DISTRICT $1,352,601.71 $13,207.26 $14,407.36 ($27,071.99) ($1,902.52) $1,351,241.82
DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT $445,249.76 $16,437.56 $3,774.34 ($20,535.19) ($204.17) $444,722.30
PARKING $51,270.66 $183,441.67 $12,417.65 ($83,733.43) ($76,291.25) $87,105.30
STATE GAS TAX $676,264.47 $19,385.49 $15,111.68 ($95,084.89) ($36,199.25) $579,477.50
COUNTY GAS TAX $8,779.55 $0.00 $91.54 $0.00 $0.00 $8,871.09
PARK REC.FAC.TAX $268,775.37 $0.00 $3,363.55 ($28,747.47) $0.00 $243,391.45
RAILROAD RT.OF WAY $1,937,000.72 $82,461.04 $0.00 ($129,832.55) $0.00 $1,889,629.21
6% UTILITY USERS TAX $431,647.25 $112,328.74 $3,976.30 $0.00 ($111,398.25) $436,554.04
PROPOSITION A FUND $174,388.90 $8,547.18 $643.71 ($2,522.04) ($751.16) $180,306.59
PROPOSITION C FUND $168,529.18 $10,284.00 $1,717.98 ($35,748.76) $0.00 $144,782.40
GRANT FUND $154,289.74 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $154,289.74
AIR QUALITY MGT.DISTRICT $22,315.80 $0.00 $0.00 ($365.85) $0.00 $21,949.95
CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT $56,841.23 $2,878.47 $697.94 ($6,671.56) ($1,439.94) $52,306.14
SEWER MAINTENANCE $3,339,133.66 $157.25 $97,610.11 ($13,749.84) ($1,345.72) $3,421,805.46
POLICE ASSET SEIZURE $608,047.63 $1,480.00 $11,415.83 ($19,883.40) ($3,448.58) $597,611.48
FIRE PROTECTION FUND 5443,798.27 $15.00 $5,676.90 $0.00 ($3,314.33) $446,175.84
SELF INSURANCE FUND $861,148.24 $0.00 $85,545.00 ($68,789.21) ($22.14) $877,881.89
$13,246,710.46 $1,055,041.14 5497,678.34 ($1,501,227.33) (5414,405.26) $12,883,797.35
PER THE REQUEST OF THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION,
THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT FUND IS BEING RENAMED THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND.
TRUST
ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE
Payroll
$5,261.11 $625,319.52 $625,124.34 $5,456.29
GENERAL 5607,703.30
$10,614,062.50 PAYROLL $5,158.95
INACTIVE DEPOSIT
$1,876,490.55 $540,196.13
INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY
$298,629.30
INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE
11/.4/
►
1RKMAN, CITY TREASURER
a1EA
4, 1994
OUTSTANDING CHECKS
INACTIVE DEPOSIT
$612,862.25
$214,161.66
$398,700.59
$12,490,553.05
BALANCE $12,889,253.64
Honorable Mayor
and Members of the
City Council
March 15, 1994
City Council Meeting
of March 22, 1994
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE
PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH
Attached is report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the
month of February 1994. This is the most current available
investment information.
Respectfully submitted,
/�K
Jv'n/'. Wor an
•i - Treasurer
NOTED:
Stephen urrell
City M. .ger
1d(3)
INVESTMENT REPORT - FEBRUARY 1994
DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET
INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST
LAIF
BALANCE 2/1/94 57,110,000.00
INVESTMENT 1,000,000.00 02/03/94
MATURITY (500,000.00)
BALANCE 2/28/94 57,610,000.00
LACPIF
Railroad Right -of -Way Account
BALANCE 2/1/94 51,876,490.55
BALANCE 2/28/94
U.S. TREASURY BOND
Investment
Investment
Investment
INVESTMENT TOTAL
SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST
BALANCE 1/1/94
BALANCE 1/31/94
CHICAGO TITLE
BALANCE 12/1/93
BALANCE 12/31/93
TRUSTEE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
Respectfully Submitted,
Joh • M. �'rkman
C; y Tre•surer
02/16/94
4.359%
51,876,490.55 3.960%
51,005,937.50 09/14/90 06/30/94 51,005,937.50 51,044,060.00 8.50%
5989,687.50 12/03/92 11/30/97 $ 989,687.50 51,038,440.00 6.24%
1,008,437.50 02/18/93 01/31/98 51,008,437.50 51,022,810.00 5.625%
512,490,553.05
5527,814.40
5527,814.40
512,232.83
512,381.73
5540,196.13
513,030,749.18
8.625X
2.594%
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
March 1, 1994
Regular Meeting
March 22, 1994
REQUEST FOR 30 -DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF
TWO PUBLIC WORKS FIELD PERSONNEL AND ONE POLICE SERGEANT
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of a
Sweeper Operator, a Maintenance I, and a Police Sergeant.
Background:
PUBLIC WORKS: There is currently a vacancy for a sweeper operator in the Public Works
Department. A Maintenance I has temporarily been assigned to the sweeper position, thereby
creating a vacancy for Maintenance 1. The Maintenance I position is being filled by a temporary
employee. The City is postponing recruitment for a replacement Sweeper Operator until the option
of contracting has been explored by the Public Works Department.
POLICE DEPARTMENT: A Police Officer was appointed as Acting Sergeant on August 1, 1993 to
fill the newly created position of Detective Sergeant. Testing has been completed for the Sergeant
Classification and an appointment will be made following the certification of the Eligibility List.
Analysis:
Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual
to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six months without approval from the City
Council every thirty (30) days.
Respectfully�sub�mi
4
Robert A. Blackwood
Personnel Director
Concur:
Sf"ephen Burrell
City Manager
n c.d... cun,,«".._'
Amy Amirani
Public Works Director
1.%
Val Straser
Chief of Police
March 15, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members Regular meeting of
of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
IN -LIEU PARKING SPACES
Recommendation:
•
The Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission recommends to
the City Council:
1. The 20 parking spaces set aside for the purpose of business incentives will
be disposed as per described in alternative I.
Background:
At the Downtown Enhancement (DE) Commission meeting of January 5, 1994, the
Commission directed staff to prepare a report and identify funding sources to provide
parking in the downtown Hermosa Beach. At the City Council meeting of December 14,
1993, the same issue was raised by the City Council. At the February 16, 1994, DE
Commission meeting, alternative I was selected to be recommended for approval to the
City Council.
Analysis:
In -lieu fee
Brief Description: A fee imposed on new developments only to mitigate parking
requirements. Several cities currently have in -lieu parking fee in place such as City of
Newport Beach ($150 per space per year) and City of Manhattan Beach at $21,055 per
space. The City of Manhattan Beach also has a leasing program at $25 per space per
month.
City of Hermosa Beach's Coastal land use plan was approved in approximately 1980 with
an in -lieu fee of $1,500 per space. The City Council in 1986 established the fee at $6,000
to adjust with an annual CPI (making the current price around $8,500). Since the
inception of the program, no developer or business owner has taken advantage of the
program due to the pricing of the in -lieu fee and the fact that there are other mitigation's
that could be exercised in place of the in -lieu fee program.
The City Council is currently in the process of approving revisions to the Land Use
Element. The price of the in -lieu fee as part of this new revision could be set at a more
reasonable rate so that it would provide an incentive for developers and business owners
to develop or expand businesses in Hermosa Beach.
Commission recommended to the City Council a $6,000 per space for the in -lieu program
realizing that the cost of constructing a parking space in a parking structure would cost
more than $6,000. However this rate will provide an economic incentive to a property
owner. City Council at their meeting of January 22, 1994, approved the recommendation
of setting aside $120,000 of the Downtown Enhancement Commission's fund for the
purposes of obtaining 20 parking spaces.
These spaces will be distributed as follows:
Alternative I
Criteria for distribution:
1. Any assignment or distribution subject to City Council approval.
2. First priority should be given to make up of lost parking on Pier or Hermosa Avenues
should parking spaces be lost based upon implementation of R/UDAT.
3. Remaining spaces distributed based upon following criteria:
A. Spaces go to new construction or remodels of existing buildings
B. Spaces may be applied only to meet parking requirements for daytime
office/retail use
C. Spaces may be applied only to projects under 10,000 square feet
D. Maximum distribution per project would be 50% of required office/retail
parking needs
10,000 square feet was chosen since it is the figure used in the new parking standards to
set the limit on the 1:1 FAR exemption.
Parking spaces will be distributed based on first come first serve objective until all 20
spaces are used.
2
Currently the code allows a developer to apply for a parking plan instead of providing
parking. It is recommended that a policy be established that the requirement of the in -lieu
fee not be waived as part of the parking plan so that the Commission could exercise the in -
lieu fee requirements.
Process would also include:
1. An application for an available in -lieu parking space would be made to the
downtown Enhancement Commission.
2. The DE Commission, applying the criteria approved by City Council, would vote
on the application with a recommendation to either accept or reject the application.
•
3. The City Council would either adopt, modify or reject that recommendation at the
next available Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted:
avvoGQAw\
Amy Amirani
Director of Public Works
aa/downtown.dib
3
Stephe 9' . Turrell
City Manager
March 16, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
March 22, 1994
BEACH CITIES FIRE SERVICES CONSOLIDATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
Recommendation:
It is recommended that a contract for an amount not to exceed $39,325.00 be awarded to Ralph
Anderson and Associates to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of consolidating the beach
cities fire departments. The actual cost to Hermosa Beach for the study would be one third of the
overall cost - $13,108.00. Award of the contract is contingent upon Manhattan Beach and
Redondo Beach making a similar decision. The 1993-94 Budget contains $15,000 for this study.
Background:
The Cities of Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach agreed to consider the idea of
a fire department consolidation last fall. A Request for Proposal was prepared and distributed to a
variety of consultants. A total of six (6) proposals were received from consulting firms. The firm
of Ralph Anderson and Associates was selected by all three cities, as a result of submitting the
lowest qualified bid, their experience in conducting similar studies and their general knowledge of
the area.
The study will be broken into two phases. Phase I will be completed in 90 days following
authorization, while Phase II will be completed in 30 days after receiving notice to proceed.
Phase I will document the present levels of services provided by all three departments and identify
issues and opportunities that exist for a full or partial consolidation. Phase II, if authorized, would
develop a specific set of recommendations on a possible consolidation including organizational
structure and legal status, costs, and implementation plan and schedule.
The consultant's work will be monitored by an oversight committee which will consist of three
representatives of each City. This will include a representative of the Firefighters Association, Fire
Administration, and the City Manager.
A copy of the complete proposal is on file in the City Manager's office.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Steph R. : urrell
City Manager
lg
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa
Beach City Council
FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning vile -tor
itW
SUBJECT: Request from the Kiwanis Club to Build a Trash
Enclosure on City Owned Property
DATE: March 15, 1994
Recommendation
Approve the request to construct a trash enclosure on public
property which is currently leased to the Kiwanis Club.
Attached is a letter from the Kiwanis Club to construct a trash
enclosure on city owned property in the parking area behind
Kiwanis Hall. The attached sketch shows a standard 5' X 7"
concrete block enclosure in a location that would not interfere
with parking or access to the park.
It should be noted that in addition to City Council approval a
building permit is also required.
CONCUR:
Stephen
City Man
Burrell,
ger
Attachments
1. Kiwanis letter
2. Site Plan
- 1 -
lh
KIWAN IS CLUB . OF HERMOSA BEACH
Post Office Box 121
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
March 3, 1994
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Gentleman:
RECEIVED
MAR 3 1994
PLANNING DEPT.
The Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach requests approval to construct a
trash enclosure on City land. We make this request in order to
take advantage of BFI's very generous offer to pick up our trash
without charge.
The attached drawing indicates the place we have identified to
construct the enclosure. We propose to locate the enclosure on an
existing tow -away zone so that existing parking will not be changed
in any way.
We think the construction of the enclosure will not adversely
affect the public's use of the parking lot or the park. To the
contrary, we believe the enclosure will enhance the look of the
area by providing a covered area for the trash awaiting pickup
instead of our current practice of piling plastic bags full of
garbage along side the Kiwanis building.
We thank you for your attention to our request. If you have any
questions please call me at 374-2093.
Since el,�
/' `/) l I
Haro Roberts,
Kiwanis Representative
I /�
4 Y
ita
ikt
1 Ci75- ° "i i r:x4
March 15, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of March 22, 1994
POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODEL
FURNITURE PURCHASE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommend by the Police Department Staff that Council:
1. Authorize the purchase of office furniture to outfit the downstairs
area of the Police Department through the Los Angeles County
purchase agreement #54807 for a total cost of $40,134.21.
BACKGROUND:
The purchase of the furniture mentioned herein was authorized as
apart of the Police Department remodel and funds were appropriated
in the 1993-94 adopted budget. The source of funds for this
furniture is the Narcotics Asset Forfeiture Funds.
ANALYSIS:
The remodel of the downstairs area of the Police Department is now
complete. We are prepared to purchase furniture for these office
areas. No bids were requested for the purchase of this furniture due
to the fact that there are current L.A. County contract bids that
provide the lowest bids available because of volume purchase and
government discounts. The cost savings difference of government
bid contracts versus private dealer list bids is several thousand
dollars.
The current Los Angeles County Agreement #54807 is through
McDowell Craig Office Furniture of Norwalk, California for office
furniture for the Detective Bureau, Sergeants office, the
briefing/training room, and the Operations offices. The current
furniture in use is 20 plus years old. The majority of this furniture
was manufactured by McDowell Craig and has proved to be quite
durable. Based upon our experience with the McDowell Craig
furniture, we felt that a purchase of additional furniture would not
only modernize these office areas but provide us again with durable
1i
a
furniture that will last for the next 20 plus years and also be
compatible with existing furniture.
McDowell Craig grants the County of Los Angeles a 59% discount on
their furniture. If payment is made within 30 days, an additional 3%
discount is added to the discounted price. We can receive the full
62% discount. (This would adjust the final payment to $38,930.19)
The furniture that is to be replaced will be utilized to furnish other
offices within the Police Department, Fire Department, and other city
offices as supplies last.
The staff recommends City Council approve these purchases as this
office furniture is needed to fill the bare offices as they are now.
This will greatly enhance the appearance and modernize this area of
the Police Department.
Concur:
STEPHEN R. BURRELL
CITY MANAGER
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
VIKI COPELAND, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Res ectfull submitted,
1713s
VAL STRASER, CHIEF OF POLICE
SENT BY:McDOWELL CRAIG
3-14-94 ; 4:14PM ; 3109219648.4 21377988926;# 2
1^r;R 23 '93 8159 FROM ISD/PORCH CENTRAL SVC PAGE.002
it41
li tall•PAOMnal►.a*
UMW
To: McDowell -Craig
13146 Pirsitons Blvd.
Norwalk, . CA 90651-0349
m..br.awr Mleebbe rti — y TO
2.62 •
...=1titms.w...mm"•• 43• - `o'a.
AMllenwRT.liiir .l
ICE-ETEEL-CONTEMP0
R.r.
/}jrlRr, Y14i.OTMftMgiPICD09LL/CRAIG—AZTEC & MONTEREY
•���0.� 1t.sAsfM SERIES
••••� ...,pew. .....« TEL : 213/773..3451 FAX: 310/92].-9f+�':;
45 r w.WV....«..o.,k
-•••••••lb. �i3 Garciti040(Lat
*fa CatM,W o1 1.41b ArgwaaewM Year 'Mr to te..Me .e. PIOVIP 112111 teeeb MON f.R..L..m..M et tow M vara by thee nae w eeewlelM Mimes rNfel.l of
the Woe ..ewteeblemr. M ta!VIML. tl AMMb. MUd1.Mt copeoldows f< t e tweed eettlrlow Mae M dreMtld masa.. led Pont000t Aittioswoove, PbtanapU Orem and
Caedea INN M lMpeM t0 Oa Mute aid wows MMM tee awe 1t GideeiMla ewld.r tmlb antialtINiall aflb uta at Mt NNW Mud an tb be so aeblaer•e.
Pima OvmAAN'rt* %suets b1Ae►otae Areres& eetelte. grim we eteelettee ter the mole Of peq pre..drlree. Ib els en.nt of a btta.O.MHero. Orr ptould you at
.ret ebbe earth, file KM Of elle teeming me the tae.'' ne.w,ltl fir trhla Mir MOAN ONOOO y a.a nutter, wool lo.M to tea state Of CMtfemtM. of Mat dL QI t
teaeaetl Cr to an C.denw e► Mellllsllidtll, *NM the I O of GINO.MMo dt AM OS WOW MON UMW home% yew all emelt atatety emote file lessen cosn to tr *
Cavity et Lee wlq.tel.
MUM OFLOSANUI
1811181ALSERVICIII DIPARTt gN?
i. AARULD Av11NYEE
F.O. imams
MTV OFCOMMMRcL CAMOq
?U .ph.n. 00 710: 4879
Oube w.
008386
...■■Uor0.0.
54807
,s/R/4.6
P292
•.s e..s vee
48E BELOW*
3E! EELOW** RETAIL PERMIT #SR-AD14-650327
UMITPRIGS UNri
ATTENTION: VENDorESARTNSNT-SPECIAL NOTE: County departments
are not author's }o use iffiagreemat><t ae aparchasing source
for products not specifically coveted herein. Changs of iteia,
equipthsat•, or modifications to prices. specification'', or
conditions, eto., of this agreement can be made only by the
- Purchasing Agent by issuance of official amendment and in
accordance with properly authorized changes agreed upon
prior to consummation.
RBPLACBS A#51745
eat. value: A750,000.00
FORWARD •
�T To MGL_ 1AR TO Li=�gm1 ?Az.
COWAN/IRS teat SUVA=
TW* *A SMR AO)I IIT'' um:
fasumu® ONLY WON AJ IP? alt A
rtmtlR�tAff al�olMM.
• RRTIU!' N =PM:
COtiNT'Y OP LOS ANG!LIS
INTERNAL semis DEPARTMENT
PURCHMINe * STONES
MOE. CARMMELO AVENUE
P.O. ROX222111
care OP COMMRRCS. CA 90010
CC: UFA
SECTION C
ACCIPYAMC! AMD Room. of Tins
AOMMIMIMINT 1$ manly ACKscri tDGlol
MAIIA NMME
vONkmON Yt{l 0M4%v
COUNTY CF LOS ANGELES
I'JRCHASINla *BENT
aY .
SENT BY:McDOWELL CRAIG ; 3-14-94 ; 4:15PM ; 3109219648-0
t R 23 '93 9:00 FROM ISD/PURCH CENTRAL SVC
Pante. 2/FORWARD saisi NMT No. 6480'7
=MRS AND MICR LIST
Office Furniture -Steel -Contemporary Includes
Ail Desks -Tables --Credenzas Bookcases -Lateral
Files -Seating -Modular or Component Style Desks -
Cabinet Tops, Etc. -Complete Line -A11 McDowell
Craig Price Lists Dated 3-15-91
COLOR AVAILABILITY'
Standard Frame Colors'
467
468
417
444
448
469
440
472
425
415
Desert Plum
Ice
Almond
Western Tan
Erick'
Glacier Blue
Putty
Slate
Grey
Mist Green
Standard. Plastic Laminates'
L-1 Rosewood
T-2 V.sae1.Oak
L-3 Gunstock Walnut
L-4, English Oak
L-5 Roney Teak
L-6 Claret
L-7 Mauve Brown
iL-8 Putty
CUSTOM COLORS*
47,2
410
432
450
470
464
462
411
425
422
L -►9
L-10
L-12
L-14
L-18
L-20
L-21
L-22
Autumn Haze
Claret
Blue
Green
Ventura Tan
Char Fled
Char Blue
Mauve Brown
Cocoa Brown
Bamboo
Almond
Western
Light Taupe
Monterey Grey
preen
`slue
Rose Renaissance
Qak Renaissance
21377988926;4
PAQE.000
DISCOUNT
-59%
466 Char Green
480 char Taupe
414 Blond Tan
433 monterey GrOy
420 Black
430 Dark Taupe
431 Light Taupe;
471---Graanite
415 Dc ort Sage
L-24
L-23
L-26
i,-27
L-28
L-29
•
Storm Gray Matrix
French Blue Matrix
Sage matrix.
Amethist Matrix
Greige Matrix
Taupe Matrix
Por special color match add $90.00 set -yup mixing charge. Add 6% to r:ach
unit price. Additional charges are applicable per color,, per order.
VENDOR A$BISTANCE*
vendor will furnish, at no cost to the County, a representative
County departments in determining their furniture requirements?
office layout and description writing on modular unite.
to aasi3t
including
SENT BY:MCDOWELL CRAIG ; 3-15-94 ; 3:14PM ; 31092196484 21377988928;# 2
MCDOWELL CRAIG
• Leader in Advanced Ergonomic Technology
• Manufacturer of Superior Quality Office Furniture
March 15, 1994
Captain Mike Lavin
Hermosa Beach Police Department
540 Pier Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Dear Captain Lavin,
Here Is McDowell -Craig's quotation for new office furniture for your depart-
ment renovation:
QTY Model No.. Deacrintiori (ALE&
Desks. Returns. Carrelg.
1 MD-69360FH Double Pedestal Desk
full height, center drawer end lock
L-25, 469. - 69 3/4"w x 30"d x 29"h
3 MD-60360FH Double Pedestal Desk
full height, center drawer and lock
L-25, 469. - 60"w x 30"d x 29"h
$1,830.00 $1830.00
$1,660.00 $4,980.00
9 MSDE-60300FH - 3 right hand, 6 left hand $1,255.00 $11,295.00
Single Pedestal Desk, full height, center
drawer and lock. Adapt 2 right hand and 5
left hand desks for carrel.
L-25, 489. - 60'w x 30"d x 29"h
3 MA6-45FH - 1 left hand, 2 right hand $840.00 $2,520.00
Machine Height Return - one convenience
drawer, one box drawer, one file drawer.
L-25, 489. - 45 1/2"w x 20"d x 26"h
5 MA9-45FH - 2 left hand, 3 right hand $870.00 $4,350.00
Desk Height Return - 2 file drawers
L-25, 469. - 45 1/2"w x 20"d x 29"h
1 MA9-45FH-R right hand Desk Height $870.00 $870.00
Return with MSF -27-15-112 (2 box
drawers, one file drawer) In lieu.
L-25, 469. - 45 1/2"w x 20"d x29"h
2 MCA -600 -LT Carrel, open back with $1,170.00 $2,340.00
2 receding door cabinets and task light
469. - 60"w x 14 9/16"d x 30 3/4"h
5 MCA -601 -LT Carrel, closed back with
2 receding door cabinets and task light
469. - 60"w x 14 9/16"d x 30 3/4"h
01,230.00 56,150.00
13146 Firestone Blvd. • Norwalk, California 90650 • (213) 773-3451 • (714) 521-7170 • Fax (310) 921-9646
SENT BY:McDOWELL CRAIG ; 3-15-94 ; 3:15PM ; 31082196484 21377988926;# 3
MDOWELL- GRAIO
Captain Mike Lavin
Hermosa Beach Police Department
540 Pier Avenue •
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Page two
CREDENZAS
4 M27 -80A Credenza with
2 full height pedestals (2 box drawers,
3 file drawers) and 27" knee space
L-25, 489. - 60"w x 20 3/8"d x 29"h
2 M27 -60C Credenza full height with
2 box drawers, 3 file drawers and
1 hinged door storage cabinet.
L-25, 469. - 60"w x 20 3/8"d x 29"h
1 M27-69 Credenza full height with
2 file drawers, 1 hinged door
storage cabinet
L-25, 469. - 69 3/4"w x 20 3/8"d x 29"h
1 M27 -60C Credenza full height with
2 MSC -27-3018D (hinged door
storage cabinet) in lieu and spacer
L-25, 469. - 60"w x 20 3/8"d x 29"h
1 M27-69 Credenza full height with
MSF -27-15.112 (2 box drawers, 1 file
drawer) in lieu with Lock on
MSC27-3018D only
L-4, 428. 89 3/4"w x 20 3/8"d x 29"h
1 MA -1 Adjustable Keyboard Platform
installed on above
TABLES
1 MST9-4520 Sergeants Table
L-25, 469. - 45 1/2"w x 20 3/8"d x 29"h
3 Briefing Tables consisting of:
1 T-9620 and 2 EP -2029
L-25, 469. - 96"w x 20"d x 29"h
2 MCT -4530 Computer Table
L-25, 469. - 45 1/2"w x 30 3/8"d x 29"h
3 MCT -6030 Table
L-25, 469. - 60"w x 30 3/8"d x 29"h
01,320.00 45,280.00
41,920.00 43,840.00
01,840.00 41,840.00
61, 744.00 41, 744.00
41,890.00 61,890.00
4265.00 6265.00
5600.00 4600.00
0670.00 02,010.00
0720.00 61,440.00
6810.00 02,430.00
SENT BY:McDOWELL CRAIG ; 3-15-94 ; 3:15PM ; 3109219648-+ 21377988926;# 4
MCDOWELL-CRAIG
Captain Mike Lavin
Hermosa Beach Police Department
540 Pier Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Page three
*CESSORIES
17 MSC -5L Letter width storage compartment
469
4 MCS -5C Legal width storage compartment
469
5 KB -22 Keyboard drawer
placement to be determined
469
BOOKCASES
9 BC -3656 Bookcase with 3 adjustable
shelves. 36"w x 13 1/4"d x 56"h
469
1
FILING
1
BC -3643 Bookcase with 2 adjustable
shelves. 36"w x 13 1/4"d x 43"
428
A1202 Legal width The with 4 A -153C
drawers for 3 x 5 card filing
489
3 P42-401 DHF Lateral file, 4 drawers
letter hanging folder with MT -4218
radlus edge top installed
L-25. 469
3 P42-401 DHF -C Lateral file, 4 drawers
legal hanging folder with MT -4216
radius edge top installed
L-25. 469
1 P42-401 DHF top, DHF -C Lateral file
4 drawers letter top, legal bottom
three, MT -4218 radlus edge top installed
L-25, 469
1 P42-401 HHD top, DC -C bottom Lateral
file, 4 drawers, half height drawers top
opening, legal compressor drawers bottom
three. L-25, 46Q
0120.00
8150.00
0265.00
02,040.00
$ 600.00
$1,325.00
8400.00 03,600.00
0380.00 0380.00
0753.00 8753.00
01,290.00 03,870.00
01,290.00 53,870.00
01,290.00 61,290.00
01,275.00 01,273.00
SENT BY:McDOWELL CRAIG ; 3-15-94 ; 3:16PM ;
MgDOWELL- CRAIG
Captain Mike Lavin
Hermosa Beach Police Department
540 Pier Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
3109219548-0
Page four
TILING
1 P42-301 DHF -C top, DHF bottom 2, Lateral $1,070.00
file, three drawers, legal top, letter
bottom two with MT -4218 radius edge top
installed. L-4, 428
SEATINQ
29 C-100 Side Chair with wall saver legs
Citadel Newport, 469
13 L2 -150P Armless Swivel Tilt Chair
with pneumatic seat height adjustment
Citadel Newport, 489
3 L2 -190P High Back swivel tilt chair
with pneumatic seat height adjustment
Citadel Newport, 469
1 L2 -190P High Back swivel tilt chair
with pneumatic seat height adjustment
Citadel Gemstone, 428
3 C-120 Side Chair with arms
Citadel Newport, 469
2137'1988926;# 5
$ 1,070.00
$165.00 $4,785.00
$502.00 $6,526.00
$670.00 $2,010.00
$670.00 4670.00
$230.00 $690.00
Total List Prices 090,428.00
Total with 59% discount per County Agreement $37,075.48
Sales Tax 8.25% 1i 3.058,73.
Grand Total $40,134.21
Price includes delivery. and setting in place. Approximate lead time: four weeks
after receipt of order.
We at McDowell -Craig would like to thank you for selecting us as your source
for quality steel office furniture. Your use of our County Agreement has savad
the city of Hermosa Beach approximately $10,000.00, based on an Gstimeted
50% discount from dealers on a project of this scale. Please contact me if I
can be of any assistance.
Sincerely,
Richard M. Fratts
Sales Manager
RMF/tm
March 10, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Memebers Regular Meeting of
of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
DETERMINATION OF BASIC CABLE TV RATES
Recommendation
It is recommended by staff and the City's cable television consultant that Council adopt the
attached resolution to:
1. Accept the equipment and installation rates as reasonable.
2. Disapprove the rate for the Basic Service tier as it is unreasonable. Prescribe a lower
rate and order refunds.
Background
As a rate regulatory authority, the City must issue a decision on whether basic cable rates
proposed by MultiVision Cable TV for the City are reasonable based on Federal Communication
Commission rules and regulations.
The City applied for certification to regulate basic cable rates from the FCC and was granted
certification on October 17, 1993. The City's determination of reasonableness of rates will be
based on information provided by MultiVision on the FCC Form 393 submitted to the City on
November 30, 1993. The City issued a 90 -day delay in the effective date of the proposed rates.
Thus, the City must make a decision by March 30, 1994. If the City does not meet this deadline,
MultiVision's proposed rates will automatically be approved and go into effect. As future rates
can only be increased by costs of inflation and increases in some operating costs, the setting of the
initial rate will have a long term impact on cable television rates in the City.
If Council disapproves MultiVision's existing rate schedule, MultiVision has the right to appeal
the City's decision to the FCC within 30 days. The Commission will take written comments from
the City and the cable operator to determine if the City has based its decision on a rational basis.
Implementation of any roll -back of rates or refunds would be stayed pending the FCC's
determination.
Analysis
A review of MultiVision's existing rate schedule and supporting material has been completed by
staff and the City's cable television consultant, Communications Support Group. The review
revealed a number of areas of the FCC Form 393s requiring additional information or clarification
by MultiVision. MultiVision provided a response to the City's request for additional information
4
dated March 4, 1994. Communications Support Group has recalculated MultiVision's FCC Form
393s based on corrected information. This recalculation will reduce the price of the Basic Service
tier from $19.60 to $18.07 -- a reduction of $1.53 per subscriber per month. A refimd order for
overcharged amounts retroactive to September 1, 1993 (the effective date of the FCC's rules) will
result in a savings of approximately $83,120.00 to the citizens of Hermosa Beach in refunds.
Fiscal Impact: As the City's Franchise fee represents 5% of MultiVision's gross revenues, the
City will lose approximately $500 per month with the fee reductions.
Other alternatives available to Council include:
1) Adopt a resolution approving MultiVision's existing rates and charges
2) Adopt a resolution ordering MultiVision to keep an accurate accounting of all revenues
from here forward that may be liable to a future refund order by the City (i.e. make no
decision at this time).
Respectfully Submitted,
Ma
ooney
As .stant City Manager
ATTACHMENT A:
ATTACHMENT B:
ATTACHMENT C:
ATTACHMENT D:
ATTACHMENT E:
OaLi "#
Charles S. Vose
City Attorney
Discussion of Staff Recommendations
Financial Analysis
Special Issues with Regard to February 22 FCC Ruling
Tier and Channel Changes Effective September 1, 1993
Resolution to Disapprove Rates for Basic Service Tier
Attachment A
DISCUSSION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Accept the equipment and installation rates as reasonable.
All assertions made by MultiVision are generally supported by the Cable Data Reports,
Supplemental Worksheets, and written explanations provided by MultiVision to the
City. Although there are some additional questions which have arisen from our review
of these documents, definitive answers could only be gained through a detailed
financial audit of MultiVision's accounting procedures. Further, any potential changes
which might have resulted from an audit are unlikely to be extensive enough to make
a significant difference in the permitted rates in Hermosa Beach. Given the financial
costs which would be involved in conducting an extensive audit, the strict time
deadlines to complete the setting of the initial rates, and the relatively small potential
gain relative to City costs, staff recommends accepting as reasonable the equipment
costs reported by MultiVision in its Form 393.
2. Reject the Basic tier rate, prescribe a lower rate and order refunds based
on the inclusion of the five Super Cable tier channels as regulated
channels.
With regard to the proposed rates for the Basic service tier, however, CSG
recommends the City find MultiVision's rate unreasonable. This recommendation is
made because MultiVision excluded the channels offered in its Super Cable tier from
its calculationof the benchmark and permitted rate.
Background
MultiVision has completed the FCC Form 393 using information for one tier of service
-- the Basic Service. This represents only one of two tier options MultiVision offers.
In channel line-up changes effective September 1993, MultiVision eliminated the
Satellite Tier Service and established a five channel package tier known as the
SuperCable Service. MultiVision offers the programming services on this package tier
on an a la carte basis as well. The services offered on this tier were previously
offered on the basic and satellite tiers and are not currently offered on any other tier.
The SuperCable package can be purchased as a tier for $3.85 or on an a la carte
basis for prices ranging from $1.00 to $2.50 per channel.
Rate calculations for the Basic Service Tier are based on three factors:
• Total number of regulated channels
• Total number of satellite delivered channels
■ Number of subscribers served by the cable system
The calculations are generally designed so that an increase in the total number of
regulated channels will result in a decrease in the permitted rate. Therefore the
omission of SuperCable channels from the rate calculations results in an artificially
high permitted rate.
Determination of Regulated vs. Nonregulated Status of SuperCable Service
True "a la carte" packages are exempt from being counted as regulated channels
when they meet certain threshold conditions.
MultiVision asserts that their classification of the SuperCable package as an
unregulated service is consistent with FCC rules. Specifically, in their response to the
City dated March 4, 1994, MultiVision paraphrases the FCC's Report and Order on
rate regulation, "a Ia carte services may be packaged on a collective basis so long as
two criteria are met: 1) price for the combined package must not exceed the sum of
the individual charges for each component of service; and 2) the cable operator must
continue to provide the component parts of the package to subscribers separately in
addition to the collective offering."
MultiVision has correctly identified the conditions but fails to reference footnote 808 of
the FCC Report and Order, which states, "This second condition is satisfied only when
the per channel offering provides consumers with a realistic service choice. For
example, we do not think a cable operator can escape rate regulation simply by
announcing that tiered services are available a Ia carte or by offering services at a per
channel rate that ensures that few subscribers will avail themselves of this option."
Additionally, on February 22, 1994, the FCC adopted modified rate regulation rules for
the treatment of "a la carte" packages. While the full text of these rules will not be
available until late March, the Executive Summary issued on February 22, 1994
states, "When assessing the appropriate regulatory treatment of 'a la carte' packages,
the Commission will consider certain factors, among other considerations, that would
suggest that packages should not qualify for non-regulated treatment, including:
■ whether the introduction of the package avoids a rate reduction
that otherwise would have been required under the Commission's
rules;
• whether a significant number or percentage of the "a la carte"
channels were removed from a regulated service tier;
• whether the package price is deeply discounted when compared
to the price of an individual channel; and
■ whether the subscriber must pay significant equipment or other
charges to purchase an individual channel in the package."
Decision Factors
1. The pricing structure of the SuperCable package makes the purchase of an a la
carte channel an unrealistic choice.
SuperCable Channel Price Comparison
2. MultiVision failed to provide the City with any figures related to the number of
customers subscribing to the SuperCable package or any individual channel.
However, few, if any, Hermosa Beach subscribers chose to take any
SuperCable package channel as an a la carte service. Given that this service
option has been available to subscribers for over seven months, we believe that
this is an strong indication that MultiVision's a la carte offerings are not a
realistic choice for customers.
3. 80% of the channels offered on the SuperCable package were removed from
regulated tiers of service. TNT, and Discovery were removed from the
Preferred Cable Satellite Service tier while TBS and WGN were removed from
the Limited Basic Service tier. Entertainment TV is a new channel added to the
system.
4. Subscribers must pay a $18.25 field change of service fee for adding or
deleting individual channels.
5. Inclusion of the channels offered on the SuperCable package in the rate
calculations significantly lower the Maximum Permitted Rate for Basic Cable
Service. Calculations by the City's cable television consultant, CSG, indicate
that subscribers will see Basic Cable rates reduced by $1.53 per month in the
with a total savings in refunds to all Hermosa Beach subscribers being
approximately $83,120.00.
CSG does not suggest similar treatment be given the People's Choice offerings. This
is because two of the three People's Choice offerings were previously offered by
MultiVision as Premium services while the remaining three offerings are new additions
to the MultiVision Zine -up.
Package
price
Number of
channels
Package
price per
channel
Ala carte
channel price
Percent
difference
SuperCable
$3.85
5
$0.77
$1.00 - $2.50
30%-225%.
2. MultiVision failed to provide the City with any figures related to the number of
customers subscribing to the SuperCable package or any individual channel.
However, few, if any, Hermosa Beach subscribers chose to take any
SuperCable package channel as an a la carte service. Given that this service
option has been available to subscribers for over seven months, we believe that
this is an strong indication that MultiVision's a la carte offerings are not a
realistic choice for customers.
3. 80% of the channels offered on the SuperCable package were removed from
regulated tiers of service. TNT, and Discovery were removed from the
Preferred Cable Satellite Service tier while TBS and WGN were removed from
the Limited Basic Service tier. Entertainment TV is a new channel added to the
system.
4. Subscribers must pay a $18.25 field change of service fee for adding or
deleting individual channels.
5. Inclusion of the channels offered on the SuperCable package in the rate
calculations significantly lower the Maximum Permitted Rate for Basic Cable
Service. Calculations by the City's cable television consultant, CSG, indicate
that subscribers will see Basic Cable rates reduced by $1.53 per month in the
with a total savings in refunds to all Hermosa Beach subscribers being
approximately $83,120.00.
CSG does not suggest similar treatment be given the People's Choice offerings. This
is because two of the three People's Choice offerings were previously offered by
MultiVision as Premium services while the remaining three offerings are new additions
to the MultiVision Zine -up.
FCC Inquiry
On December 13, 1993, the FCC announced that it sent letters of inquiry to 35
cable systems for possible violations of the rate regulation rules. Among the
practices the FCC is questioning is the practice of removing channels from the
basic tier and charging for them on a per channel (a la carte) basis. The FCC
has stated it may be many months before it is able to announce decisions in
these cases, long after the City will be required to make its rate determination.
City Jurisdiction
Per FCC rules, the City may only regulate the rates of Basic Cable Service. The
FCC regulates the rates of Cable Programming Services. However, in
performing the rate calculations for either of these services, all regulated
channels carried on the cable system must be taken into account. Thus, the City
examined all levels of service offered by MultiVision and determined that the
SuperCable package constituted a regulated tier of service based on guidelines
provided by the FCC. In its Executive Summary issued on February 22, 1994,
the FCC reminded franchising authorities that "they have the discretion to
resolve questions or ambiguities regarding the application of the rate -setting
process to individual circumstances and that, if challenged on appeal, the
Commission will defer to the franchising authority's decision if supported by a
reasonable basis."
Conclusion
Given the deep discounting of the package compared to per channel rates, the
impracticality of purchasing these channels as a la carte services, the retiering
of several previously regulated channels into the SuperCable package, and the
FCC's recent rule modifications, staff recommends the City consider the
SuperCable package as a regulated service when calculating the Maximum
Permitted Rate Per Channel as it will result in lower Basic Service rates.
Specifically, staff estimates the. 36 -Channel Basic Tier rate (36 x $.502) will be
$18.07 instead of the $19.60 charged on September 1, 1993.
Attachment B
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Implementation of staffs proposed rate for basic cable services will result in a monthly
savings of $1.53 per subscriber. Total savings to Hermosa Beach subscribers per
month is estimated to be $11,874.33.
If the Council adopts the resolution to require retroactive refunds of overcharged rates
the total refund order to Hermosa Beach subscribers is estimated to be $82,577.00.
These figures are based on the assumption of a 7 month refund period from
September 1, 1993 to March 31, 1994.
The City receives five percent (5%) of MulitVision's gross revenues as a part of its
cable franchising requirements. FCC rules stipulate that the City must refund to
MultiVision any overpaid franchise fees resulting from a retroactive refund order issued
by the City in its rate determination process. We estimate that $82,577.00 will be
refunded to subscribers by MultiVision should the Council decide to adopt staffs
proposed rates. This would require the City to refund or credit approximately
$4,128.00 to MultiVision as overpaid franchise fees.
Attachment C
SPECIAL ISSUES WITH REGARD TO FCC FEBRUARY 22 RULING
On February 22, 1994, the FCC revised a number of aspects relative to its rate
regulation rules. The actual text of the new rules will not be available until
approximately March 22nd, and will not be effective until May 15, 1994. A review of
the Executive Summary released on the 22nd reveals at least three items of particular
importance to the City of Hermosa Beach.
Reduction of the Benchmark. The most important action taken by the Commission on
February 22, 1994 was the reduction of the benchmarks used to calculated the
permitted rate for the programming services (ie. the Basic tier in Hermosa Beach).
The action allows the reduction of September 30, 1992 rates by 17% instead of the
10% currently allowed.
According to the Executive Summary and subsequent conversations with FCC
officials, only rates after the effective date of the rules (May 15, 1994) are subject to
the reduction.
Collapsing of Tiers. On September 1, 1993, MultiVision collapsed its two tiers of
service into one basic service tier. According to Don Granger of MultiVision, this
change was effected because the vast majority of Hermosa Beach subscribers already
subscribed to both tiers of service anyway.
The Executive Summary of the Commission's February 22nd rule revisions specifically
lists the practice of "collapsing multiple tiers of service into the basic tier" as being a
possible evasion or violation of the Commission's rate regulations and tier buy -through
prohibition.
Wiring Maintenance Plan. On September 1, 1993, MultiVision began charging $.75
per month for the maintenance of inside wiring. This charge is optional and no charge
for the maintenance of inside wiring was in effect prior to this date.
According to the February 22nd Executive Summary, charges for new services
previously provided without extra charge must be taken out of the calculations when
determining the permitted rate per channel. This means the cost of wiring
maintenance must be removed from the current rate for the purposes for the Form
393 calculations.
As such, CSG recommends that the City reserves its right to further reduce
MultiVision's rates for the basic service tier pursuant to the FCC's pending rules.
TIER AND CHANNEL CHANGES
FROM SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 TO SEPTEMBER 1, 1993
9/30/92 Limited Basic Tier
2 KCBS
3 Local Programming
4
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
22
27
28
30
34
41
KNBC
KTLA
KABC
KCAL
KTTV
KCOP
KDOC
KTBN
WGN
KTBS
KCET
C -SPAN
KMEX
KOCE
Total = 16 Channels/$12.95
Attachment D
9/1/93 Basic Tier
2 KCBS
3 Local Programming
4 KNBC
5 KTLA
6 ESPN*
7 KABC
8 Previews*
9 KCAL
10 CNN*
11 KTTV
12 MTV*
13 KCOP
14 USA*
15 KDOC
16 The Family Channel*
17 KTBN
19 AMC*
22 KWHY+
25 Nickelodeon*
26 VH -1 *
27 Lifetime*
28 KCET
34 KMEX
35 CNBC*
36 Prime Ticket*
37 Headline News*
38 Learning Channel/Bravo*
39 A&E* •
40 C -SPAN
41 KOCE
42 The Weather Channel*
45 QVC - Home Shopping*
46 KHSC+
47 QVC- Fashion Channel*
48 KLCS+
49 KVEA+
TOTAL = 36 Channels/$19.60
*added from Preferred Basic
+new channels to system
RESOLUTION NO.
Attachment E
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
76.936, 76.940, 76.941 AND 76.942 OF THE RULES AND
REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION DISAPPROVING EXISTING RATES AND
CHARGES FOR THE BASIC SERVICE TIER, IN PART,
PRESCRIBING RATES AND CHARGES FOR BASIC SERVICE
TIER, AND SEEKING.COMMENT WHY REFUNDS SHOULD
NOT BE ORDERED
WHEREAS the City of Hermosa Beach (the "City") has been certified by the
Federal Communications Commission (the "Commission") to regulate the Basic
Service Tier, and associated equipment, which certification was effective on October
• 17, 1993; and
WHEREAS the City has provided written notice of said certification to
MultiVision Cable TV (the "Operator") on October 26, 1993; and
WHEREAS the City has adopted regulations with respect to the Basic Service
Tier and associated equipment that are consistent with the regulations prescribed by
the Commission; and
WHEREAS the City has adopted procedural laws and regulations applicable to
rate regulation proceedings which provide a reasonable opportunity for consideration
of the views of interested parties; and
WHEREAS the City has delivered a written request to the Operator to file its
schedule of rates for the Basic Service Tier and associated equipment with the City on
October 26, 1993; and
WHEREAS the Operator has filed with the City an FCC Form 393 on November
30, 1993; and
WHEREAS on December 8, 1993, the City issued an order pursuant to Section
76.933(b) of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission
stating that it was unable to determine based upon the materials submitted by the
Operator that the existing or proposed rate's were within. the Commission's permitted
Basic Service Tier charge or actualcost of equipment and that the City was tolling the
thirty -day deadline found in Section 76.933(a) of the Commission's Rules and.
Regulations for the purpose of requesting and/or considering additional information or
to consider the comments from interested parties for an additional ninety days; and
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed all relevant information including, but not
limited to, the FCC Form 393 dated November 30, 1993, the Report of the City's cable
television consultant, Communications Support Group, the Staff Report, and other
relevant written evidence; and
WHEREAS, the City has given proper notice of this hearing pursuant to Section
76.935 of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, and
Government Code Section 6066; and
WHEREAS, the City has provided a reasonable opportunity for the
consideration of the views of interested parties; and
WHEREAS, the City has considered the views of interested parties as
expressed at this public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City has now made a final decision upon the appropriateness,
or lack thereof, of the existing rates and charges for the Basic Service Tier and
associated equipment as identified on the FCC Form 393 dated November 30, 1993.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The existing rates and charges for the Basic Service Tier and
associated equipment as identified in the FCC Form 393 dated November 30, 1993
are hereby disapproved in part for the reasons, and on the grounds, as contained in
the Consultant's Report dated January 18, 1994 and the staff report dated March 10,
1994, all of which are incorporated into this Resolution by reference as if fully stated
herein.
Section 2. This Resolution constitutes a written decision disapproving, in part,
an initial rate within the meaning of Section 76.936 of the Rules and Regulations of
the Commission.
Section 3. The Operator is hereby ordered to reduce and modify the rates
and charges for the Basic Service Tier in the manner, and pursuant to the terms, as
set forth on Exhibit "A" to this resolution upon the effective date thereof.
Section 4. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby finds and
determines that the existing and proposed rates and charges for the Basic Service
Tier as identified on the FCC Form 393 dated November 30, 1993 is and are
unreasonable within the meaning of Section 76.941 in that said rates and charges do
not comply with 47 U.S.C. Section 453 and Sections 76.922 and 76.923 of the Rules
and Regulations of the Commission for the reasons and grounds as previously set
forth herein, and the Operator is hereby ordered and directed to immediately
implement the rates and charges as specified upon Exhibit "A" to this resolution.
Section 5. The City Couigpcil of the City of Hgmosa Beach hereby directs and
orders the Operator to appear at:30 p.m. on April IC, -1994 at this location to give
evidence and show cause why the City should not order that the Operator refund
previously paid rates and charges to subscribers in excess of the rates and charges
approved pursuant to this resolution.
Section 6. The Operator is hereby directed and ordered to provide a Refund
Plan ("Refund Plan") to the City within fifteen (15) days of the date of this hearing,
pursuant to which it proposes to refund to subscribers rates and charges collected by
the Operator in excess of the rates and charges approved herein since September 1,
1993, or the_earliest date from which the refund period may run pursuant to the Rules
and Regulations of the Commission, along with such written evidence and
documentation demonstrating the reasonableness and appropriateness of said Refund
Plan under the standards set forth in Section 76.942 of the Rules and Regulations of
the Commission.
Section 7. In taking the action and making the orders set forth in this
resolution, the City Council reserves the right to further reduce MultiVision's rates for
the basic service tier and associated equipment pursuant to the FCC's Second Order
on Reconsideration, Fourth Report and Order, and Fifth Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in MM Docket 92-266, Implementation of the Rate Regulation Provisions
of the Cable Act of 1992, notice of which was given on February 22, 1994.
Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post a copy of this resolution
in such place or places as City Notices are normally posted and to make copies of this
written decision available to the public at the office of the City Clerk during normal
business hours.
Section 9. This Resolution shall become effective as of the date of adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of March, 1994 by the
City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach by the following votes:
AYES: MEMBERS:
NOES: MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:
Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach
EXHIBIT A
Programming Services
Basic Service (36 channels) $18.07
Equipment Rental
Universal Remote
Standard Remote
Converter Box
Installation Charges
$0.50
$0.35
$2.60
Standard Installation $36.50
Non -Standard Aerial Installation $72.95
Non -Standard Underground Installation $109.45
Additional Outlet at time of Initial Installation . $18.25
Additional Outlet requiring separate Installation $27.35
Field Upgrade/Downgrade of Service $18.25
Electronic Change of Service $2.00
March 14, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-3 AND TEXT AMENDMENT
PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE SIGN ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS:.
A. TO ADD PROVISIONS TO ALLOW RECONSTRUCTION OF
NONCONFORMING HISTORIC SIGNS
B. TO ADD EXCEPTIONS FOR TEMPORARY GRAND OPENING
SIGNS (TO ALLOW BALLOONS, FLAGS, PENNANTS)
C. TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT THAT WINDOW SIGNS ARE
ALLOWED TO OBSCURE THE WINDOW FROM 20% TO 50%
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commission Recommendation
To recommend amendments A and B, but to recommend against the
proposed amendment C.
Background
At their meeting of February 15, 1994, the Planning Commission
considered the three subject amendments to the sign ordinance,
and voted to recommend in favor of amending the code to provide
exceptions for A) historic signs and B) temporary grand opening
signs. However, the Commission recommended against any
amendments to increase the allowance for window sign coverage.
The subject amendments were initiated as follows:
HISTORIC SIGN EXCEPTION: Initiated by the City Council at their
meeting of January 11, 1994 (arose out of concern about "The
Lighthouse" sign).
GRAND OPENING SIGN EXCEPTION: Initiated by the Planning
Commission at their meeting of January 18, 1994.
INCREASING WINDOW SIGN COVERAGE: Initiated by the City Council
at their meeting of January 25, 1994.
Analysis
These three separate issues are all recent attempts to refine the
sign ordinance. While each issue is very specific and distinct,
all three amendments would make the ordinance slightly less
restrictive. The following is a brief summary of each proposed
amendment. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission
staff report for the analysis.
HISTORIC SIGNS
The proposed exception is to allow a property or business owner,
subject to the approval of the Planning Commission, to repair a
severely damaged historic sign, or remove and repair the sign.
Otherwise, existing nonconforming signs are only allowed to be
repaired if damage is less than 50% of replacement cost and if
repaired without being removed. Facial copy change is always
allowed to nonconforming signs.
The Planning Commission supports this amendment, although, as
they have noted in the past, there is a very limited number of
situations where it might apply.
GRAND OPENING SIGNS
This proposal would add exceptions to the sign code to allow
balloons, -flags or pennants for grand openings. These types of
signs are otherwise prohibited (banners, however, are allowed).
The Commission supports allowing exceptions for these signs for
promotional grand openings.
WINDOW SIGN COVERAGE
The sign ordinance limits the coverage of windows to 20%.
Changing the amount to 50% would obviously be a significant
change.
The Planning Commission recommends against this change as the
impact could be very noticeable, and potentially detrimental.
In the attached staff report, please note the comparison with
other city's which have window coverage requirements. Redondo
Beach and Manhattan Beach are not included as they do not have a
comparable requirement.
MichaeSchubach
Planni;g rector
Steph- Burrell
City anager
Attachments
1. Proposed ordinance
2. P.C. Minutes 2/15/94
3. P.C. Resolution
4. P.C. Staff Report 2/15/94 w/attachments (available in the Pl . Dept . , PolicE
Dept., City Clerk's office, and the library for public review)
- 2 -
.t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE 94-
OratiOAWAUL.-
AnRESelioireN OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND
PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13.5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SIGNS, TO
CREATE EXCEPTIONS FOR HISTORIC SIGNS AND FOR GRAND OPENINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 22,
1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made the
following Findings:
A. Exceptions for historic signs from the nonconforming
provisions of the sign ordinance will encourage the
protection, preservation and long term maintenance of such
signs,
and contribute to preserving some of the historic
landmarks of the city;
B. Temporary exceptions for grand opening promotions from
prohibitions for flags, pennants, balloons, and maximum sign
area requirements are reasonable to help new businesses
establish themselves and be successful in the City;
C. The proposed amendments are categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
pursuant to Section 15311 of the State CEQA Guidelines,
because the proposed amendments will effect the construction
or placement of minor structures; on premises signs.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance
text be amended as follows:
SECTION 1. Add the following to Section 13.5-17, Nonconforming
signs:
"Exception. The above provisions may be waived by the
Planning Commission for a sign or signs found to be of
historic value. The Commission shall base its determination
on a consideration of .the following criteria:
- Age of sign - is it more than 25 years old; and
- Business it advertised - did the business or activity
being advertised have some prominent place in the
history of Hermosa Beach; and
—3—
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- Appearance - does the sign have any attractive on
memorable features? Do the sign features demonstrate
any significant trend or period in the
arts/architectural history?
An exception may be granted by the procedure set forth in
Section 13.5-20, Sign Review, sub -section (b) and (c).
If an exception is granted, and in order to protect the
historic character of the signs, no additional sign shall be
permitted on the premises."
SECTION 2. Add the following the Section 13.5-21, Temporary
Signs.
"(6) Exception for grand openings. The requirements of
sub -section (1) regarding the allowable area for temporary
signs, shall not apply to one time grand opening promotional
events. Further, signs otherwise not allowed by this
ordinancesuch as flags, pennants, and balloons may be
permitted in conjunction with a promotional grand opening,
but shall be subject to sub -section (2), duration of display,
and (3) application."
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of
its final passage and adoption.
SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause
this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a
weekly newspaper of general circulation published and
circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the
manner provided by law.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, and
shall make minutes of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1994, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
p/perssign
SS 93-6 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO EXAMINE ARTIC
13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFOR G
ILDINGS AND USES (continued from November 16, 1993, Janua 19 and
Febr • 1, 1994 meetings).
: To recommend approval of said text amend
Mr. Schubach stated the most r nt continuance was due to the fact • e Commission had wished a full
Commission present for review of th' 'tem. He felt the ordinanc= ad been revised as the Commission
wished. Comm. Suard requested a corr ion on page 4, p. agraph 4, line 12; deletion of the double
"that". Chmn. Merl felt the draft incorporat i the Co..•ssion's previously -expressed changes.
Chmn. Merl opened the Public Hearing at 7:1
.m.
Chmn. Merl closed the Public Hearing at .10 p.m.
MOTION by Chmn. Merl, Sec
one wished to speak relating to this item, and
ed by Comm. Suard, to CO I UE this Resolution to the next
scheduled meeting to allow ' .eing heard by a full Commission.
AYES: Co ms. Marks, Suard, Chmn. Merl
NOES: 1 one
ABSENT. Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda
ABS • IN: None
8. SS 94-2 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE SIGN
ORDINANCE:
a) Historical sign exemption
b) To allow temporary grand opening and special event signs
c) To increase the amount window signs are allowed to obscure the window from
20% to 50%
Staff Recommended Action,: a) To recommend approval of historical sign exemption, b) To
recommend approval of the temporary grand opening and special event signs, and c) To recommend
not to approve the window signs up to 50%.
Mr. Schubach stated other cities' policies had been reviewed and compared. He detailed those policies
and Staff -recommended criteria for the Commission.
Chmn. Merl opened the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m.
Warren Barr, president, Chamber of Commerce, stated the Chamber's support of items (a) and (b).
The window signage ordinance had been reviewed in 1993 by the Chamber, which also supported Staff's
Page 5 PC Minutes 2-15-94
current recommendation for denial. He suggested an alternative concept, such as opening the issue of
banners, flags and flyers be considered by the City Council.
No one else wished to speak relating to this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Public Hearing at 7:18
p.m.
Comm. Suard stated he had favored a policy similar to that of Manhattan Beach's, but since there was
no objections from the business community, he would support Staffs recommendation. He
recommended the historical requirements of 20 years be changed to 30 or 40 years. After discussion,
the Commission agreed to extend the 20 years to 25 years. Mr. Schubach commented that Comm. Di
Monda's proposed an alternative to amending the nonconforming section; to make an exception that
if a business -owner felt his sign had significant historical nature to him, he could present the facts to the
Commission, who could add an amendment to the nonconforming sign exception section. Chmn. Merl
felt the ordinance adequately addressed the issue and delineated and Commission's previously -expressed
thoughts.
MOTION by Comm. Suard, Seconded by Chmn. Merl, to APPROVE SS 94-2 with the one change
to the historical building section, requiring 25 instead of 20 years.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Comms. Marks, Suard, Chmn. Merl
None
Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda
None
T-IRINGS
9. SS 93-8--,c-„, SPECIAL STUDY TO ADD OR DELETE COND ONAL USE
PERMITS FOI�VARIOUS USES, AND GENERAL REVIEW O HE PERMITTED
USE LIST FOR COMMERCIAL ZONES (continued fro se - ruary 1, 1994 meeting).
Staff Recommended Action: To direci S.
aff as deemed a . ropriate.
Mr. Schubach stated the purpose was to eamine .e request made to provide to Council a
memorandum asking for a study expansio He requeste• - ommission comments concerning the
permitted use listing. Comm. Suard-suggested the amount of Sta time it will take to conduct a
comprehensive study be included within the memorandum. Mr. Schubac ted, if Council made this
a priority (which they probably will), Staff could provide the study within a 60 da eriod. Chmn. Merl
stated the Commission also considered this item as priority and wanted the ordinance e workable.
t language served as a barrier. Mr. Schubach agreed a Staff comment woul added
Council makes this a priority issue, Staff estimates the study completed within 60 days.
mission feels this is a priority item".
He felt the c
statin '
C
Page (, PC Minutes 2-15-94
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2G
27
28
RESOLUTION P.C. 94-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13.5 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, SIGNS, TO CREATE EXCEPTIONS FOR HISTORIC SIGNS
AND FOR GRAND OPENINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
February 15, 1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made
the following Findings:
A. Exceptions for •historic signs from the nonconforming
_provisions of the sign ordinance will encourage the
protection, preservation and long term maintenance of such
signs, and contribute to preserving some of the historic
landmarks of the city;
B. Temporary exceptions for grand opening promotions from
prohibitions for flags, pennants, balloons, and maximum sign
area requirement are reasonable to help new businesses
establish themselves and be successful in the City;
C. The proposed amendments are categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
pursuant to Section 15311 of the State. CEQA Guidelines,
because the proposed amendments will effect the construction
or placement of minor structures; on premises signs.
NOW, THEREFORE, the .Planning Commission of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, recommends that the zoning ordinance
text be amended as follows:
SECTION 1. Add the following to Section 13.5-17, Nonconforming
signs:
"Exception. The above provisions may be waived by the
Planning Commission for a sign or signs found to be of
historic value. The Commission shall base its determination
on a consideration of the following criteria:
Age of sign - is it more -than 25 years old; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- Business it advertised - did the business or activity
being advertised have some prominent place in the
history of Hermosa Beach; and
- Appearance - does the sign have any attractive or
memorable features? Do the sign features demonstrate
any significant trend or period in the art/architectural
history?
An exception may be granted by the procedure set forth in
Section 13.5-20, Sign Review, sub -section (b) and (c).
If an exception is granted, and in order to protect the
historic character of the signs, no additional sign shall be
permitted on the premises."
SECTION 2. Add the following the Section 13.5-21, Temporary
Signs.
"(6) Exception for grand openings. The requirements of
sub -section (1) regarding the allowable area for temporary
signs, shall not apply to one time grand opening promotional
events. Further, signs otherwise not allowed by this
ordinance such as flags, pennants, and balloons may be
permitted in conjunction with a promotional grand opening,
but shall be subject to sub -section (2), duration of display,
and (3) application."
VOTE: AYES: Comms.Marks,Suard,Chmn.Merl
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Comms.Dettelbach,Di Monda
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 94-6 is a
true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
regular meeting of February 15, 1994. /7
RocMerT,, (C ai
Date
p/perssign
9
man Micfiael Schubach, Secretary
February 8, 1994
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 15, 1994
SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-3 AND TEXT AMENDMENT.
PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE SIGN ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS:
A. TO ADD PROVISIONS TO ALLOW RECONSTRUCTION OF
NONCONFORMING HISTORIC SIGNS
B. TO ADD EXCEPTIONS FOR TEMPORARY GRAND OPENING
SIGNS
C. TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT THAT WINDOW SIGNS ARE
ALLOWED TO OBSCURE THE WINDOW FROM 20% TO 50%
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendations
To recommend amendments A and B above, but recommend against the
proposed amendment C.
Background
HISTORIC SIGNS: At their meeting of January 11, 1994, the City
Council directed staff to prepare a text amendment to add
exceptions for historic signs. The Planning Commission, at the
meeting of November 3, 1993, received and filed the study on
historic signs, which was originally initiated by the City
Council. Discussion of this issue originated out of concern for
the historic "Lighthouse" sign.
GRAND OPENING SIGNS: At the meeting of January 18, 1994, the
Planning Commission adopted a resolution of intent to study the
issue of excepting temporary grand opening signs from the
prohibitions on such temporary signs as flags and balloons.
WINDOW SIGN COVERAGE: The City Council, at their meeting of
January 25, adopted a resolution of intent to initiate
consideration of a very specific text amendment to increase the
amount of allowed window coverage from 20% to 50%. The Planning
Commission has not previously discussed this potential increase.
Analysis
9
Staff decided to group these three separate issues into one set
of amendments to the sign code because they are all recent
attempts to refine the sign ordinance. While each issue is very
specific and distinct, all three amendments would incrementally
make the ordinance less restrictive.
HISTORIC SIGNS
The Planning Commission is already familiar with this issue, as
it was discussed at the meeting of November 3, 1993. The
Commission received and filed the matter, based on the argument
that so few historic signs exist that are worth protecting that a
special ordinance is not warranted.
The Council, after reviewing the recommendation of the Commission
is proposing to add an exception to Section 13.5-17,
Nonconforming Signs, with specific language already proposed (see
the attached draft resolution). The exception to the
nonconforming sign provisions would be granted at the discretion
of the Planning Commission subject to the following criteria:
age of sign - is it more than 20 years old?
business it advertised - did the business or activity
being advertised have some prominent place in the
history of Hermosa Beach?
appearance - does the sign have any attractive or
memorable features? Do the sign features demonstrate
any significant trend or period in art/architectural
history?
In short, the exception would allow a property or business owner
to repair a severely damaged historic sign, or remove and repair
the sign. Other nonconforming signs are only allowed to be
repaired if existing damage is less than 50% of the replacement
cost, and if repaired without being removed. Facial copy change
is also allowed to nonconforming signs.
While staff agrees with the Commission that very few historic
signs exist, we have no objection to adding these provisions.
Especially since the proposed ordinance includes a provision in
order to maintain the integrity of a historic sign, that if an
exception is granted no additional signs would be allowed.
GRAND OPENING SIGNS
This proposal is to add exceptions to the sign code, to allow
balloons or flags for grand openings. These types of signs are
currently prohibited signs. Flags are specifically listed as a
"prohibited" sign, and "moving signs" are also specifically
listed. The definition of moving signs includes balloons. These
prohibitions were added when the sign code was recently amended.
Prior to that time these types of signs were prohibited since
they were not listed as permitted.
As the Commission is aware, provisions already exist in the code
to allow banners on a temporary basis for grand openings, sales,
or for any desired purpose, for up to 60 days a year. Banners
are further limited to 40% of the allowed permanent sign area of
the premises, and shall not exceed 100 square feet. Banners are
typically adequate for businesses to promote special sales or
grand openings.
In our recent review of other cities sign ordinances in regards
to temporary signs, most other nearby cities also prohibit or do
not allow large mylar balloons (Torrance, Manhattan Beach,
Redondo Beach) while pennants and flags are allowed on a limited
basis. Long Beach, on the other hand, does allow balloons for
grand openings or promotional events.
Staff continues to believe banners are adequate, and would
caution the Commission that allowing one business to use a large
mylar balloon will likely encourage others to do the same, which
can certainly change the appearance of the commercial district.
However, staff does not strongly object to adding a! one time
exception for grand opening promotions, subject to the same 60
day limits as temporary banners.
WINDOW SIGN COVERAGE
The sign ordinance limits the coverage of windows to 20%. This
amount was not changed with the recent updates to the sign
ordinance. Also, as you may recall, the Chamber of Commerce
conducted a thorough review of the sign code, supporting most of
the eventual changes. At that time, it was never recommended to
reduce the window sign coverage.
Window signs may be permanent or temporary. In either case they
contribute to a business total allotted sign area (temporary
signs of 10 sq. ft. or less, however, are excepted).
Changing the amount to 50% would obviously be a significant
change. While many businesses would be able to take advantage of
this change, other businesses which have maximized the signage
for their business based on the 20% allotment for windows, would
not be able to add signage to their windows anyway.
In regards to the potential change in the appearance of P.C.H. or
more critically, the downtown area, the impact could be very
noticeable, and potentially detrimental. This change would seem
to be counter to the efforts to revitalize and improve the
quality of the appearance of the downtown business district.
Other cities that place limits on window coverage are as follows:
Torrance 25%
Rancho Palos Verdes 10%
Santa Monica 20%
Santa Barbara 25%
Hawthorne 50%
Long Beach 10%
CONCU
//,
Michael `8cliubach
Planning Director
Attachments
`P%n Roblrrtson,
Associate Planner
1. Resolutions to recommending text amendments
2. RE: HISTORIC SIGNS:
a) Section 13.5-17, Nonconforming signs
b) C.C. staff report/minutes 1/11/94
c) P.C. staff report/minutes 11/3/93
3. RE: GRAND OPENING SIGNS:
a) Section 13.5-21 temporary signs
b) P.C. Minutes 1/4/94
c) Reso of Intent
4. RE: WINDOW SIGNS
a) C.C.Reso of intent
March 15, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE 1994 LAND USE ELEMENT
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
CONTINUED FROM: 1/25/94
Recommendation:
Adopt the attached Resolution revising the Land Use Element of the General Plan and adoption of
a mitigated environmental negative declaration.
Background:
After numerous Planning Commisson and City Council public hearings the City Council at the
January 25, 1994 meeting directed staff to bring this item back for adoption in final form after a
final environmental assessment had been completed.
Analysis:
The Land Use Element Revision has been separated into two volumes. Volume I contains the
Executive Summary, the Goals, Objectives, and Implementation Policies, and the Commercial
Space Alternative with the Downtown Enhancement District Map and the R/UDAT
recommentations. Volume II contains all the additional studies that have been previously
reviewed and are provided as supplemental information and are not State mandated requirements
of the Land use Element. Due to the length of Volume II, copies will be available in the Planning
Department, the City Clerks office, the Police Department, and the Library for review by the
general public.
__CONCUR:
Michael Schubach,
Planning Dir ctor
Stephen R.
City Manager
0
Lindsay L. Hirsh
Planning Aide
Attachments:
1. Proposed Resolution 94- , and Mitigated Negative Declaration
2. C.C. Minutes dated 1/25/94, 11/23/93, 11/9/93, 10/26/93, 10/12/93
3. 1994 Land Use Element Revision, Volume I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
AND REVISING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND.
ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, on September 7 and September 21, 1993, the Planning
Commission held public hearings to consider the revision and
update to the Land Use Element, and;
WHEREAS, on October 12, October 26, and November 9, 1993, and
January 25, 1994, the City Council held public hearings to
consider the revision and update to the Land Use Element and made
the following findings:
A. The revisions and update of the Land Use Element of the
General Plan include current goals, policies, and objectives
for the general development of the City and, further,
designates theproposed general distribution and general
location, extent, and type of uses of land throughout the
city;
B. The revised Land Use Element is consistent with other
elements of the City's General Plan;
C. The updated and revised Land Use Element contains the
necessary information and analysis to meet the requirements
Section 65302 of the Planning and Zoning Law for the State of
California;
D. Based on the evaluation of the Staff Environmental Review
Committee of the development policies contained with the Land
Use Element, and', the goals, objectives, and implementation
policies contained therein, and with .the incorporation of
mitigation measures, the adoption of the Land Use Element
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
will result in a less than significant impact onthe
environment;
NOW, THEREFORE, the the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, does hereby adopt the updated and revised Land Use Element
dated March 1994.
ATTEST:
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED .this day of
, 1994, by:
PRESIDENT' 5f the City Council and MAYOR of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
re
p/pershsng
3
Location
a. Address:
b. Legal:
ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION
City of Hermosa Beach
N/A
Description
Revision to the Land Use Element of the General
ment of •eneral •olas ob'ectives an.
land -uses throughout the city and recommendations for correcting
between designations on the General Plan and zoning maps.
Sponsor
a. Name:
Plan
including the establish -
City of Hermosa Beach
E
inoonsistenc
b. Mailing Address:
1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Phone: (310) 318-0242
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
In accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City of Hermosa Beach, which implements the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an
environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning
Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the
City, which are subject to the Environmental Quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review
and, if it becomes final, no comprehensive Environmental Impact Report is required for this project.
FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance
with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a
comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included
in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this
finding is on file in the Planning Department.
2-3-94
Date of Finding Chairman, Environmental Review Committee
FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance
with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a
comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included
in the projects it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this
finding is on file in the Planning Department.
Date of Finding
Chairman, Planning Commission
FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance
with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a
comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because,..rovided the attached miticYation measures are included
in the project, it would not have a significant effect on t environment. Documentation supporting this
finding is on file in the Planning Department.
Date of Finding Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council
-4-
Mitigation Measures in regards to the downtown alternative to
reduce parking requirements
1. The City will continue to require parking in -lieu fees,
provided via a fund transfer or by direct payment to an
improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking,
in an amount sufficient to off -set increases in required
parking. After in -lieu fees are provided for 100 spaces,
those 100 spaces must be provided.
2. An ordinance will be established to require bicycle
racks/facilities in conjunction with new development or
intensification uses of existing buildings
3. A reporting and monitoring program will be established by the
City to monitor new building construction, parking space
construction, use of alternative forms of transportation, and
changes of use of existing buildings, and the total effect on
parking demand to determine the feasibility and need for
increasing parking supply in the downtown area.
S
ran
Janu
r
ntinued from the December 14, 1993 meeting.) Memo -
um from Planning director Michael Schubach dat=d
18, 1994.
Plannin. Director Schubach presented the staff eport
and resp• ded to Council questions.
The public hearing o•-ned at 7:35 P.M., coming forwar• to address
the Council on this it:m were:
Jack Wood - 200 Pier Avenue, #39, r:•resenting the
busines- owner, responded to •uncil questions
and said the owner agreed to he change recom-
mended by he Planning Comm sion; and,
Parker Herriot - 224 24th S reet, said that the
City of Los geles do -s not allow doors on
viewing booth-; quest'oned if Hermosa Beach
City. Ordinance was •eing obeyed; and raised
questions of publ'c ealth and safety.
The public hearing closed at 7:49
Action: To approve
recommendation to gr
subject conditions
#15, that the doo
entry by the p
5653, entitle
e Planni
nt the appe
with the clan).
locks will be of
ice, and, to adopt
HA RESOLUTION OF THE
g Commission and staff
to eliminate the two
cation, in condition
type not to impede
esolution No. 94-
C Y COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HE• •SA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO A•PROVE A CONDI-
TIONAL USE/ PERMIT WITH CONDITIONS, ELIM ATING TWO OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION IMPOSED CONDITIO ON APPEAL,
FOR AN/EXISTING ADULT BUSINESS (SALE OF AIULT BOOKS,
VIDEO , MAGAZINES AND PARAPHERNALIA AND ADUL• THEATRE/
ARCADE) AT 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOT 2 AND LOT 4, BLOCK B, REDONDO •ERMOSA
T'RACT."
%Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion car ed,
/ noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Edgerton.
5. 3rd QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT
REVISIONS. (Continued from October 12, 1993; October
26, 1993; November 9, 1993; and, November 23, 1993 meet-
ings.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated January 19, 1994.
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
The meeting recessed at 7:59 P.M. in order to allow extra copies
of the Land Use Element revision to be made.
The meeting reconvened at 8:09 P.M.
The public hearing opened at 8:17 P.M. Coming forward to address
the Council on this item was:
Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, said residents
City Council Minutes 01-25-94
Page 8411
paid most of the taxes, not businesses; com-
plained of too much traffic; questioned how
this would come back and if it could be subject
to a Referendum.
The public hearing closed at 8:20 P.M.
Straw Vote: To approve the Goal (page 46, Commercial
Space Alternative) to maximize commercial uses on down-
town commercial properties.
The vote was all ayes.
Straw Vote: To approve the R/UDAT guidelines for the
downtown area (page 46 - 48).
The vote was all ayes.
-Straw Vote: To approve the Downtown Business Area En-
hancement District Advisory Commission expanded area map
(page 60) .
The vote was all ayes.
Straw Vote: To leave Area I (at the north end of City
as shown on map 11 (a) on page 18) as R-3.
The vote was all ayes.
Straw Vote: To agree to omit the phrase, "on private
property", in reference to public parking structures
constructed and operated by the private sector.
The vote was all ayes.
Action: To direct that the Land Use Element Revision be
brought back for adoption in final form after a final
environmental assessment and Planning Commission review
of any final changes for the Regular Meeting of March
22, 1994.
Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion car-
ried unanimously.
The order of the agenda was suspended at 9:01 P.M. to go to item
no. 9.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
6. RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED WITH -THE PREP-
ARATION -,QF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO CREATE UNDERGROUND
UTILITY DISTRICTS FOR PROJECTS ON PIER -AVENUE, PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY, AND__BEACH DRIVE.etorandum from Public
Works Director Amy Amir-.ani.dated-January 12, 1994.
Public Works Director Amirani resented the staff report
and responded to C9uncil questions
Coming forward to address the Council on this item wast'
Bob ----Jensen - Southern California Edi n Area
Manager, responded to Council questions; said
City Council Minutes 01-25-94 Page 8412
r �
CIT P OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
CERTIF G THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY.", (w ch
sets Spee• limits on City streets; is required o be
certified e -ry five years; and sets the r--•mmended
speed the sam- as the posted speed), wit he under-
standing that st- f will verify, and co ect if neces-
sary, all speed lim postings and sen• o the Municipal
Court for certificatio
Motion Oakes, second :enz. The motion carried
unanimously.
7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND PORTS CITY MANAGER
(a) CLARIFICATION• DOWNTOWN SILVE• METERS WILL BE
BAGGED BEG ' ING NOVEMBER 24, 1993.
- Acting C Manager Rooney said that she ished to
clarif hat the downtown meters would be bagge start-
ing •vember 24, 1993, in time for the post Thanksving
s. es period.
(b)
REQUEST TO CONTINUE LAND USE ELEMENT REVISION TO
THE JANUARY 25, 1994 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Memo-
randum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated
November 15, 1993.
City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve continuing the Land Use Element
revisions to the meeting of January 25, 1993, with the
understanding that those portions of the Land Use Ele-
ment that had not been reviewed by the previous Council
would be discussed first, then previously discussed por-
tions could be reviewed, if requested by one of the new
Councilmembers.
Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried
unanimously.
LIBRARY SERVICES TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGH END OFY
Acting City IT'a ager Rooney reported on - public hear-
ing held by Stat Senator Ralph Di on November 15,
1993 in the Hermosa Beach Cit Council Chamber, to
gather input from resi .ts - Hermosa and Manhattan
Beach in regard to the of - of County Library reduc-
tions. Ms. Rooney.als• report -° that the County will
continue staffing t•- Public Libra -.&s at the current
level (two days . week for Hermosa Be h) through the
end of the 19• -94 fiscal year.
Mayor •gerton directed, with the consensus of the un-
ci , that staff gather information regarding all options
vailable to the City.
City Council Minutes 11-23-93 Page 8359
-$-.
Mot •n Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carrie
unani usly.
2. CONSENT OINANCES
(a)
ORDINANCE NO. 3-1098 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE C. Y OF HER-
MOSA BEACH, CAL ORNIA, AMENDING SECTION .5-17 OF THE
CABLE TELEVISION YSTEMS OF THE MUNIC AL CODE. For
adoption. Memorandu. from City Cler Elaine Doerfling
dated November 2, 1993
Action: To adopt Ordinan - N. 93-1098, entitled, "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF -• RMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTION 7.5-17 OF H CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE."
Motion Edgerton, seco.. Midstokke. So ordered.
3. ITEMS REMOVED F
DISCUSSION
Items 1
time bu
Pu
(g
THE CONSENT CALE
R FOR SEPARATE
(i), (j), (k) and (1) were hea d at this
are shown in order for clarity.
is comments on items removed from the consent c. en -
r are shown under the appropriate items.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT
REVISIONS. (Continued from October 12, 1993 and October
26, 1993 meetings.)
(a) Planning Commission review and comment on Sections
already heard at Public Hearings of October 12,
1993 and October 26, 1993.
(b) Continue review on Commercial Space Alternative, R/
UDAT recommendations, and proposed expanded Down-
town Business Area Enhancement District.
The public hearing opened at 7:37 P.M. Coming forward to address
the Council on this item was:
Jerry Newton - 2041 Circle Drive, said he had
attended in order to speak on this item, but if
this item is to be continued, he could return
and speak when it was brought back.
The public hearing closed at 7:38 P.M.
Action: To continue item 4(a) and (b) to the meeting of
December 14, 1993 in order to allow the new Council to
make the decisions.
Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. 'The second was
City Council Minutes 11-09-93 Page 6
Cr
qualified by Edgerton to continuing 4(a) only. The mo-
tion to continue 4(a) and (b) was then seconded by Benz
and carried unanimously.
SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING WALL •.'
FENCE HEIGHT. With an Ordinance for introduction nd
waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Planning Di ec-
tor Michael Schubach dated November 1, 1993.
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report
nd responded to Council questions.
The public
dress the Cou
earing opened at 7:45 P.M. Coming forward to ad-
cil on this item were:
ete Tucker - 235 24th Street, said
seals the cement blocks and does
moisture to escape, which caus
• ack and blister and in time
than unpainted walls; questio
fore the aesthetic value of
Dean Not. - 2467 Myrtle Aven
this 'as an unnecessary
cement lock walls, as
eye of e beholder a
done; agre.d with the
the long te , painte
The public hearing closed at 7:5: P.M
Proposed Action: To intr
delete the reference to ".1
Motion Edgerton, second May
withdrawn when City At orney
to State law with re rd to te
would have to go b.ck to the
review of the propo=ed change.
at painting
not allow the
the paint to
looks far worse
ed who would en -
hese walls;
, said he thought
rohibition of gray
sthetics were in the
some were very well
evious speaker; felt in
walls would look worse.
uce the Ordinance amended to
in gray untreated block".
Wiemans, The motion was
se advised that, pursuant
amendments, the matter
anning Commission for.
Action: To send he Ordinance back • the Planning Com-
mission to rev -w the Council amendm=nt which deletes
the words, "P :in gray untreated bloc or..." on line
26, of the fi st page of the Ordinance, o the sentence
reads, "Char link fences are prohibited."
Motion Edg-.ton, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car-
ried unan ously.
Pro•ose
Action: To renotice this item for the regular
meetin of January 11, 1994.
Motio► Edgerton. The motion was withdrawn, as a date
cert in was not required and renoticing automati ally
wou.d be done by staff.
MUNICIPAL •TTERS - None
6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
City Council Minutes 11-09-93 Page 7
(a)
CONSENT ORDINANCES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFO•
AMENDING. SECTION 7.5-17 OF THE CABLE TELEVISION SY EMS
THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
Acti • City Manager Rooney presented the s .ff report
and re onded to Council questions.
Action: T. introduce Ordinance No. 93- 98.
Motion Esser •er, second Edgerton. T.- motion carried,
noting the abs-.ce of Benz.
Final Action: To aive full
93-1098, entitled, ORDINAN
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AME''ING
- TELEVISION SYSTEMS OF TH
Motion Essertier, second
r::ding of Ordinance No.
• OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
CTION 7.5-17 OF THE CABLE
ICIPAL CODE."
erton.
AYES: Edgerton, Es--rtier,
NOES: None
ABSENT: Benz
dstokke, Mayor Wiemans
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALE
DISCUSSION
R FOR SEPARATE
Items 1 , (c), (f), (g), and (.h) were hea d at this
time b" are shown in order for clarity.
Pu
iC comments on items removed from the consent c. en -
r are shown under the appropriate items.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT
REVISIONS. (Continued from October 12, 1993 meeting.)
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
Councilmember Benz left the meeting at 7:38 P.M.
Mayor Wiemans asked to change his vote on area 1 at the
meeting of October 12, 1993, stating that he would not
want the R-3 area in the north side of town downzoned to
R-1.
City Attorney Vose said this was not a formal action as
the vote taken was a "straw vote" to determine Council
interest in proceeding or not upon a course of action
for a future public hearing and the vote could be
changed from 3 to 2, to a 4 to 1 vote to retain R-3 in
area 1.
City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8329
The public hearing opened at 7:50 P.M. Coming forward to ad-
dress the Council on Parking Vis -A -Vis land Use (page 34) were:
Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, questioned the
proceedings regarding parking if the General
Plan were amended (City Attorney Vose said
policy decisions were not site specific and
that a General Plan amendment is subject to the
referendum process once the Resolution is
adopted);
Howard Lonqacre - 1221 Seventh Place, questioned
the perceived emphasis on downtown parking and/
or a parking structure; questioned if the
citizens had been adequately informed; ques-
tioned the writing of the report; requested a
• list of parking permits;
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., suggested the
study be trashed; parking stickers should be
for one year; downtown parking lots are not
full at night and could be used to more ad-
vantage by commercial customers;
Roger Carlson - Council candidate, felt that
Hermosa could emulate Manhattan Beach and have
smaller parking structures that would not be
obtrusive.
The public hearing closed at 8:07 P.M.
Proposed Straw Vote: To remove the Community Center lot
from objective 1.2.
Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. The motion failed
due to the objections of Edgerton and Mayor Wiemans and
the absence of Benz.
Straw Vote: The Council expressed consensus to adding,
...on private property." to objective 1.1. There were
no other changes to the draft report. (Benz absent)
Coming forward to address the Council with a question regarding
the meeting of October 12, 1993 was:
Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street, spoke regarding
areas 4 and 5 (page 31, heard October 12, 1993)
and the proposed redesignation from Medium Den-
sity Residential to Commercial SPA (Specific
Plan Area); said the areas had been designated
R-2 due to the lack of the parking needed for
Commercial and residents' opposition to Commer-
cial; suggested changing the General Plan to
match the zoning.
Proposed Straw Vote: To make the areas mixed-use.
Motion Edgerton. The motion died due to the lack of a
second.
City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8330
Proposed straw Vote: To continue with the R-2 designa-
tion for the areas.
Motion Mayor Wiemans. The motion died due to the lack
of a second.
Proposed Action: To reconsider the designation for areas
4 and 5.
Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion
failed due to the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Es-
sertier and the absence of Benz.
The public hearing opened at 8:33 P.M. Seeing no one come for-
ward to address the Council on Open Space/Public Facilities
Designation (page 34-35) the public hearing closed at 8:33 P.M.
The Council made no changes to the draft report.
The public hearing opened at 8:39 P.M. Seeing no one come for-
ward to address the Council on Uses of Public Rights -of -Way for
Private Purposes (page 35-36) the public hearing closed at 8:39
P.M.
Action: To reopen the public hearing to allow public
testimony from residents wishing to speak.
Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Benz.
The public hearing was reopened at 8:44 P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on Uses of Public Rights -of -Way for Private
Purposes was:
Chuck Sheldon 1800 The Strand, spoke regarding
the bureaucratic cost to the City for the is-
suance and enforcement of encroachment permits
for the small number of Strand owners involved.
Straw Vote: To approve Objectives 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 for
Goal 1, and to add Objective 1.4 to read, ',Prior to
using the vacation method or enforcement permit method
process for unused public right-of-way areas, a thorough
examination of the method of implementation, i.e. en-
croachment procedure, shall be made to determine the
most effective procedure and shall be made a criterion
in deciding which method shall be used."
Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried,
noting the objection of Mayor Wiemans and the absence of
Benz.
Straw vote: To amend Goal 1 to read, "To evaluate all
City right-of-ways to determine whether or not there is
any future public use and which right-of-ways could pos-
sibly.be controlled through encroachment permit process
or vacated to decrease visual blight."
City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8331
C Ct
Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car-
ried, noting the dissenting vote of Midstokke and the
absence of Benz.
The public hearing opened at 9:07 P.M. Seeing no one come for-
ward to address the Council on Property Maintenance (page 36) the
public hearing closed at 9:07 P.M.
The Council made no changes to the draft report.
The public hearing opened at 9:11 P.M. Seeing no one come for-
ward to address the Council on Design Review (page 36-37) the
public hearing closed at 9:11 P.M.
Straw Vote: To approve the draft report to include the
City Attorney's amendment of Goal 1 to read, "...when a
proposed project is located within their jurisdictional
boundaries." and the amendment of Objective 1 to include
the phrase excluding single family homes after. Specific
Plan Area (SPA).
Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car-
ried, noting the absence of Benz.
The public hearing opened at 9:14 P.M. Seeing no one come for-
ward to address the Council on Historic Preservation (page 38)
the public hearing closed at 9:14 P.M.
Straw Vote: To approve the draft report as amended in
Implementation Policy 1.2 to delete, at the end of the
sentence, "...made non-profit for tax purposes as an
incentive." and substitute, "...should be afforded the
opportunity for property tax exemption.”
Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Benz.
Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of
the Council, that the remainder of item 4 be continued
to the meeting of November 9, 1993. (Benz absent)
The meeting recessed at 9:19 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:38 P.M. and returned the order of the
agenda to item 1.
UNICIPAL MATTERS
5. QUARTERL ATUS OF C.I.P. PROJECTS. M
Public Works .' ector Amy Amirani -. ed October 19,
1993.
andum from
Public Works Directo
and responded t
Actio
Irani p - ented the staff report
uncil questions.
To approve the staff recommendation to -ceive
file the report showing 25 fiscal year 1993-94
City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8332
C C
Valley Drive to two-way traffic from Second Street
Hero do.
MotioriE sertier, second Midstokke. The motio carried
unanimous
At 7:45 P.M. the order o the agenda was sus•csnded to go to the
public hearing, Item 4.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - Non
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM ,THE CONS
DISCUSSION
Items 1(a),
(h), (i), (j).
CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
and (k) we - heard at this
time but -are shown in order for clarity.
* Public comments on items removed from the onsent
calendar are shown under the appropriate item
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT
REVISIONS, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum
from Planning Director Michael Schubach, dated October
5, 1993.
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
City Attorney Vose suggested the Council consider each
section of the Land Use Element revisions separately.
The public hearing opened at 7:55 P.M. Coming forward to address
the Council on General Goals, Objectives and Implementation Poli-
cies (page 28-31) was:
Gene Dreher - 1222 Second Place, Council candidate,
asked where the public could have a copy of the
report in order to follow the Council- delibera-
tions; suggested more information, or a presen-
tation, be available to the public.
The public hearing closed at 8:00 P.M.
The Council made no changes to the draft report.
The public hearing opened at 8:05 P.M. Coming forward to address
the Council on Current Land Use Element (page 31) was:
Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, asked if there
could be Council discussion before the public
input; objected to greater commercialization of
the downtown; objected to a parking structure
or anything that would bring in more traffic.
The public hearing closed at 8:10 P.M.
City Council Minutes 10-12-93 Page 8314
The Council made no changes to the draft report.
The public hearing opened at 8:14 P.M. Seeing no one come for-
ward to address the Council on Inconsistencies Between Zoning and
General Plan Map (page 31-32) the public hearing closed at 8:14
P.M.
The Council made no changes to the draft report.
The public hearing opened at 8:32 P.M. Coming forward to address
the Council on Building Intensity/Population Density Standards
(page 32-33) was:
Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, said that low
density , was desirable; questioned what was
being done tonight as he did not want decisions
made tonight.
The public hearing closed at 8:35 P.M.
The Council made no changes to the draft report.
The public hearing opened at 8:49 P.M. Coming forward to address
the Council on Land Use Designation Revisions (page 33) were:
Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street, questioned area 4;
and,
Ruth Brand - 1231 First Street, asked what the dif-
ference was between R -P and R-3.
The public hearing closed at 8:55 P.M.
Straw Vote: To leave Area 1 as R-3.
Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Mayor
Wiemans.
Proposed Straw Vote: To leave Area 2 as R -P.
Motion Benz, second Edgerton. Councilmember Edgerton
asked:the City Attorney if he could vote on this issue
as he owned property in the area. City Attorney Vose
ruled that Edgerton's property ownership was a conflict;
at that time, 8:58.P.M., Edgerton withdrew his second
and left the dais and the room. The motion died due to
the lack of a second.
Straw Vote: To approve the staff recommendation for
Area 2.
Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Essertier. The motion car-
ried, noting the absence of Edgerton.
Councilmember Edgerton returned to the dais at 8:59 P.M.
The meeting recessed at 9:00 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:22 P.M.
City Council Minutes 10-12-93
Page 8315
C r
The public hearing opened at 9:27 P.M. Seeing no one come for-
ward to address the Council on Land Use and Structural Defini-
tions (page 33-34) the public hearing closed at 9:27 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation.
Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car-
ried unanimously.
Final Action: To continue the remainder of the items to
the Regular Meeting of October 26, 1993.
Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Benz. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting vote of Midstokke.
At 9:30 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to item 2.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. `
\ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 'E OIL
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Memorandum from Planning birector
Michael Schubach, dated October 6, 1993.
Acting City Manager Rooney presented the taff report
and responded to Council questions. Pla ning Director
Schubach also responded to Council quest ons.
Proposed Action:
from the Coastal Commission legal partment regarding
co -applicants.
Motion Midstokke \ The motion die due to the lack of a
second.
To delay this item
ending an opinion
Coming forward to address the'C,uncil 9h this item was:
Don Macpherson - o41 developer, responded to Coun-
cil questions;'sai'd he had posted the $50,000
bond.
City Attorney Vose reseonded o Council questions; said
the City acting as applicant wo ld have no affect on the
City's liability; suggested addi g a phrase to clarify
that before drawincf on the money osted as a bond, Mr.
Macpherson be given .written notice, and if payment was
not received within ten days, the m fey then be drawn
upon.
Action: To/approve the City filing as an 'applicant be-
fore the Coastal Commission and approve the\ ddition of
the City,Attorney's clarifying phrase that Mr. Macpher-
son be/given ten days written notice of th City's
request' for the money posted, and if payment 's not
received within that time, to then draw on the lett r of
credit.
Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. .The• motion carrie
noting the dissenting vote of Midstokke.
City Council Minutes 10-12-93 Page 8316
1994 LAND USE ELEMENT OF
THE GENERAL PLAN:
VOLUMES I & II ARE
AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE, THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT, AND THE
LIBRARY FOR REVIEW BY THE
GENERAL PUBLIC.
1994
LAND USE ELEMENT
REVISION
Volume I
City of Hermosa Beach
Planning Department
March 1994
•
1994 Land Use Element Revision
Volume I
Table of Contents
Title Page
Executive Summary 1
Introduction 1
Current Land Use Element., 1
Inconsistencies Between Zoning and General Plan Map 2
Building Intensity / Population Density Standards 14
Land Use Designation Revisions 14
Land Use and Structural Definitions 15
Parking Vis -a -Vis Land Use 15
Open Space / Public Facilities Designations 16
Downtown Alternatives 17
Commercial Space Alternative 18
Reduced Downtown Alternative 18
Mixed Use Alternative 19
Commercial / Residential Alternative 19
Commercial Recreation Land Use Alternative 20
Local Resident -Serving Alternative 21
Residential Alternative 21
Status Quo Alternative 22
Property Maintenance 22
Design Review 22
Historic Preservation 23
II. General Goals, Objectives, and Implementation Policies 24
III. Commercial Space Alternative 34
General / Purpose
Potential Advantages 35
Potential Disadvantages 35
Existing Downtown Conditions 35
Future Downtown Conditions 35
Potential Environmental Impacts 37
Fiscal Impacts 40
Potential Coastal Commission Reaction 40
Relationship to R/UDAT 41
Implementation 41
Expanded Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Map 44
•
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
•
•
LAND USE ELEMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
I. INTRODUCTION
The State mandated requirements for general plan .land use
elements are set forth in Government Code Section 65302(a).
According to the State Office of Planning and Research, the legal
requirements for an adequate land use element are: (1) the land
use diagram (map); (2) standards for population density; (3)
standards for building intensity; (4) identification of future
solid waste disposal sites, if applicable; and (5) a discussion
of the relationship between the Land Use Element and the
Circulation and Noise Elements.
II. GENERAL GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1: Protect and maintain the small town beach community
atmosphere of Hermosa Beach.
GOAL 2: Accommodate existing and future commercial land uses to
provide service to both local residents and regional
shoppers.
GOAL 3: Encourage land uses which enhance and promote the City's
coastal environment.
GOAL 4: Provide for the development and maintenance of public
infrastructure to adequately serve the needs of
residents and permitted land uses.
GOAL 5: Provide community resource facilities which will
adequately support the needs of local residents and
businesses.
GOAL 6: Maintain existing land use standards and controls for
the commercial and industrial districts.
III CURRENT LAND USE ELEMENT
The City's Land Use Element has been slightly modified since the
1979 revision. In its present form, the Land Use Element does
not meet the minimum requirements of State law as set forth in
Government Code Section 65302(a). The current Land Use Element
is legally deficient in the following areas: (1) inconsistency
between text and diagram regarding the the Mobile Home Park,
General Commercial, and Open Space land use designations; and (2)
total absence of building intensity standards for all
nonresidential land use designations. The legal inadequacy of
the Land Use Element could threaten the legality of other General
Plan Elements, particularly the Circulation and Noise Elements.
•
IV. INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN MAP
State law requires consistency between the zoning and general
plan maps of local governments. This study identifies all
properties within the City, grouped into 11 areas, that have
zoning designations inconsistent with the General Plan
designation.
Recommendations
Area 1: 737 and 739 Longfellow Avenue. Redesignate to LD Low
Density from GC General Commercial.
Area 2: 734, 736, 738, 740, and 744 Longfellow Avenue; 733, 735,
737, and 739 30th Street. Redesignate to LD Low Density from GC
General Commercial.
Area 3: the grassy undeveloped northerly portion of the Hermosa
Valley School site. Rezone to OS Open Space from R-3 Multiple
Family Residential.
Area 4: 803, 805, 807, 809, 811, 813, 815, 817, and 819 18th
Street; 802 and 804 19th Street; 181, 1820, 1822, 1830, 1834,
1840 and 1850 Pacific Coast Highway. Rezone from R-2 to
Commercial S.P.A. Specific Plan Area.
Area 5: i906, 1918, 1924, and 1934 Pacific Coast Highway.
• Rezone from R-2 to Commercial S.P.A. Specific Plan Area.
Area 6: 825, 827, 831, 833, 835, 841, and 844 13th Street; 830,
840 and 850 14th Street. Redesignate to MD Medium Density from
GC General Commercial (with the exception of the R-1 lot, which
should be redesignated to LD Low Density).
Area 7: 1235, 1245, 1251, and 1255 Prospect Avenue. Redesignate
lot #40 to GC General Commercial and rezone the remaining parcels
to R-1 One Family Residential from C-3 General Commercial.
Area 8: 725 10th Street and 730 11th Street. Rezone these
properties to R-2 Two Family Residential from C-3 General
Commercial.
Area 9: 603 1st Place, 620 2nd Street, and 112, 138 and 142
Ardmore Avenue. Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family
Residential from M-1 Light Manufacturing.
Area 10: 603, 605, 607, 609, 611, 613, 615, and 623 3rd Street;
322, 330 and 342 Ardmore Avenue. Rezone these properties to R-2
Two Family Residential from M-1 Light Manufacturing.
Area 11: 611, 615, and 635 4th Street; and 422-436 Ardmore
Avenue. Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family Residential
from M-1 Light Manufacturing.
•
Map 1
Area 1 Inconsistencies
Redesignate LD Low Density from GC General Commercial
,vB9'ST'E
if 15
Ii,OI
?2243
I
35
lJ i.V
I
IJ io
/3 L,5
2
,51 3
4.71:5
I
21
i
,0/5
!S
00
20
?by
19
?b
1 c0
rI
�
I5
�i 70
,.i i.:::
117
•SI,J
23
OOO/11OOO�
"
75
15
..
ca
^I3"
75
31I /7
I
1
51 /7
CS
I
IS
..
11
..
10
9
IS
ma.
:b
�'
. -:;:r-
7
•
?SAO.:.
:;�":,
::::,5 S:
;.;
:
r:i::
:::
11
13 O
1 O
1
15'
7G3 700 911 /Is
LONGFELLOW
1�1 9 3 42'7'121 1735 731
AVE.
n. .
1- w 0
Q90
O J>..I
U D po
U a
w
• COU
a .90
•
Map 2
Area 2 Inconsistencies
Redesignate LD Low Density from GC General Commercial
60
0—
In
>•
z
uJ
30 c•r)
LONGFELLOW
• 102- el ao
...‘
100
- '
1
o'
1011
lv
A.. I r
0
102
A •
1103
,
1
17,1
1'24 716 -
'7/0 iL 11,1 )11 - 7 e /VP./ '5 7 ' 3° '13; 931 -u..
0
104
?5
0
105
0
106
0
107
0
ne
0
109
0
110
0
0
112
0
113
0
114
0
115
120
122 123
7 5
7,1
147
0
146'
.1145
•
1
1
1
44
,3
0
143
s
0
142
1,
0
140
70
7 711
3QTU
7(
0
139
0
138
137
rpS" 117 7al
0
136
135
134
0
133
0
132
131
7.3 91-5 V? 2)1'131 133
r
130
129
c:
127
126
0
125
7),
124
75
73')
1-901
ST.
PAIFIC COA.5T
.90
•
•
•
Map 3
Area 3 Inconsistencies
Rezone to OS Open Space from R-3 Multiple Family Residential
•
•
Map 4
Area 4 Inconsistencies
Rezone from R-2 to Commercial S.P.A. Specific Plan Area
• 90
3
% 13 -OA
•
•
Map 5
Area 5 Inconsistencies
Rezone from R-2 to Commercial S.P.A. Specific Plan Area
-o
0
-n
•
•
•
Map 6
Area 6 Inconsistencies
Redesignate to MD Medium Density from GC General Commercial
(With the exception of the R-1 lot, which should be redesignated to LD Low Density)
•
Map 7
Area 7 Inconsistencies
Redesignate lot #40 to GC General Commercial and rezone the
remaining parcels to R-1 One Family Residential from C-3 General
Commercial
•
30
•
•
Map 8
Area 8 Inconsistencies
Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family Residential from C-3
General Commercial
•
0
0,
Map 9
Area 9 Inconsistencies
Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family Residential from M-1 Light
Manufacturing
•
10\
° g0 0
6 021,10.
Si
k
2 Nao 11 Q /lU m 0
°
d 49.70 G1 96 q2 -9. 65 p
-23
(`•‘
•
37
40
N X6°3-
•
•
Map 10
Area 10 Inconsistencies
Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family Residential from M-1 Light
Manufacturing
Po
3
•
Map 11
Area 11 Inconsistencies
Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family Residential from M-1 Light
Manufacturing
r.
•
•
V. BUILDING INTENSITY/POPULATION DENSITY STANDARDS
Statutory law does not provide any precise guidelines for
establishing adequate building intensity or population density
standards, which is undoubtedly intentional in order to give
local jurisdictions flexibility in determining their own
standards.
The City's current standard of maximum dwelling units per acre is
considered acceptable by State guidelines for both residential
population density and building intensity standards. However,
the current Land Use Element does not have any population density
or building intensity standards for the Mobile Home Park
designation.
The most significant deficiency in the current Land Use Element
is the complete lack of building intensity standards for
nonresidential land uses. This is problematic for the City in
terms of both the legal adequacy of the Land Use Element and the
absence of General Plan guidance in regards to zoning regulations
and long range planning. Various types of building intensity
measures, e.g. floor area ratio, are discussed, and sample
standards from other communities are provided.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City adopt a widely understood
nonresidential building intensity standard such as floor area
ratio for the present time in order to bring the Land Use Element
into compliance with State law. A special study could be
conducted at a later date on more sophisticated, but rarely used,
measures such building volume ratio to determine if such a
standard would offer more advantages than floor area ratio in
defining structural bulk and development potential.
VI. LAND USE DESIGNATION REVISIONS
The purpose of this section is to examine current General Plan
land use designations that exhibit one or both of the following
characteristics: (1) inconsistency with the existing land uses;
and (2) inconsistency with the existing character of the
surrounding neighborhood.
Recommendations
It is recommended that the City consider a low density or
Specific Plan Area designation in Area I because of substandard
lot sizes. In addition, the City should eliminate the R -P zoning
and replace it with R-3 zoning, or create a new General Plan land
use designation for residential/office mixes.
•
•
VII. LAND USE AND STRUCTURAL DEFINITIONS
There is presently a need in the City for more precise commercial
land use definitions to accomplish the following two goals: (1)
ensure greater predictability of the operating characteristics of
both existing and future land uses; and (2) provide stronger land
use controls to prevent negative external impacts from business
operations to surrounding properties.
Dual/multiple uses are a particular concern to the City since
this is an intensification of land use that can lead to numerous
potential impacts to surrounding land uses. Land use
intensification can involve the following factors: (1)
desirability of the land us; (2) unfair competition; (3)
incompatibility with surrounding land uses; (4) land uses
inconsistent with zoning standards; (5) public nuisance
potential; and (6) potential for increased crime activity.
Various structural features, e.g. attic, basement, floor area,
grade, loft, and story, are often either vaguely defined or not
defined at all in building and planning applications. This
situation opens the possibility for the inconsistent application
of interpretations that could be legally challenged as arbitrary
and capricious.
Recommendation
Much of the potential difficulties and controversies involved
with dual/multiple uses and structural features can be adequately
resolved by formulating precise definitions that will provide
clear and unambiguous guidance for local decision -makers.
VIII. PARKING VIS-A-VIS LAND USE
The City's commercial districts have long been distinguished by
the following land use and parking characteristics: (1) small
commercial properties that were subdivided back in the early part
of this century, when provision for off-street parking space was
not encouraged or even desirable since maximizing the number of
new lots was often the primary consideration; (2) high business
turnover rates that can result in different types of retailers,
with differing parking demand potential, occupying the same
commercial space; and (3) existing commercial uses that do not
meet current parking standards due to a lack of available space
for on-site parking.
In the past, the City did not require parking for residential
development, and at one time the City restricted developers from
establishing on-site parking in conjunction with residential
development. From observation, it is apparent that many
residential developments are lacking adequate parking, and that
finding street parking in residential areas can be almost
impossible at times. The results of the parking survey for the
four major commercial districts indicates that public parking can
adequately accommodate demand in the downtown and Pier Avenue
corridors, while Aviation Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway
partons must rely on private off-street parking.
Recommendations
A number of potential approaches to improving the City's
commercial parking space inventory are discussed, including: (1)
flexible commercial parking standards, including shared parking
facilities; (2) new commercial public parking facilities,
including public parking structures; and (3) potential
increases/reductions in commercial parking standards based on the
results of the commercial district parking survey. The
feasibility of revising residential parking standards is also
discussed, including off-site residential parking.
The following are recommended in this study:
1. Encourage private sector construction and operation of
downtown public parking structures;
2. Encourage shared parking arrangements for both existing
commercial uses and future commercial developments;
3. Retain existing zoning standards on the required number
of parking spaces for all commercial land uses; and
4. Allow more "intense" commercial uses to locate into
commercial properties previously occupied by uses exempt
from parking regulations if the required parking spaces
over and above the parking requirement for the previous
use can be provided.
IX. OPEN SPACE/PUBLIC FACILITIES DESIGNATIONS
The current OS Open Space land use designation in the General
Plan includes several types of public land uses not typically
associated with the concept of "open space." The OS designation
presently combines two completely different types of publicly
owned lands: recreational/open space areas and
institutional/public facility properties.
Recommendation
In order to correct the existing deficiencies in the OS
designation, either of the following two options could be
initiated: (1) establish a new PF Public Facilities land use
designation for educational buildings, public utility structures
and corridors, public governmental buildings, public malls and
plazas, and transit uses; or (2) create a new PF Public
Facilities overlay district for the permitted Open Space uses
listed in option #1.
•
•
X. DOWNTOWN ALTERNATIVES
Background
Downtowns in older Southern California communities such as
Hermosa Beach were originally developed in the 1920s -30s,
reflecting the subdivision and construction patterns of that
period: narrow lots with compact ground level retail space in
one and two story masonry buildings. Although retail market
demand continued to grow with the regional population, these
downtown districts could not expand horizontally, since
surrounding neighborhoods were already developed, or vertically,
due to construction costs. The lack of developable land also
constrained the expansion of parking facilities.
As the automobile made it easier for shoppers to travel longer
distances, purchasing decisions could be made on a regional as
well as local level. As residents from neighboring communities.
began to shift shopping patterns away from locally oriented
downtowns to regionally serving highway corridors, retailers
offering smaller comparison goods and convenience items also
began relocating from downtowns to newly developing shopping
centers. The inherent market advantages of shopping centers and
malls gradually drained older downtown districts of the more
general retail anchor stores.
The existing mix .of commercial retailers in downtown Hermosa
Beach is the result of regional economic trends combined with a
relative absence of public sector intervention or assistance in
determining the downtown's character and market niche.
Throughout the history of downtown Hermosa Beach, the City has
basically allowed free market conditions to determine overall
land use patterns. Until recently, no conditional use
regulations or detailed restrictions on permitted uses were
applied to downtown properties. Downtown marketing activities
have primarily focused on special Chamber of Commerceevents,
e.g. Fiesta de las Artes, and special sporting events, e.g.
volleyball tournaments.
Development patterns throughout the South Bay over the past few
decades have effectively "captured" much of the market share for
both general merchandise and entertainment/specialty shopping
demands. The market for general shopping needs is well
represented by competing South Bay shopping malls, many with easy
freeway access. The ability to draw entertainment and tourist
dollars is also under heavy competition from established South
Bay entertainment and specialty shopping districts, many located
close to the beachfront.
The following is a discussion of a variety of options the City
has for the downtown area. No specific recommendations are being
made regarding any of these alternatives. These alternatives are
essentially provided for discussion purposes, and to try to
provide an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each
alternative.
Commercial Space Alternative
This alternative would maximize the amount of commercial space in
downtown by converting all nonconforming residential uses in
downtown to commercial uses. All existing residential uses would
be subject to a specific amortization period, during which time
no residential structural improvements or expansions would be
permitted.
Potential Advantages: (1) larger stock of downtown commercial
structures provides opportunity for greater variety of retailers
and greater selection of retail goods; (2) new commercial
construction would result in greater property tax revenues; (3)
greater shopping opportunities that could attract a larger and
more diversified shopper base; (4) opportunity for greater sales
and business license tax revenues; (5) potential for increased
employment; and (6) promote downtown as a unified shopping
district characterized by a variety of restaurants and specialty
shops.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) reduction in housing stock that
could adversely impact City's supply of low and moderate income
housing units; (2) potential increase in alcohol-related
commercial uses; and (3) greater intensification of day and
night-time shoppers could create conflicts with nearby residents
in terms of parking, accessibility, noise and lighting spillover
effects.
Reduced Downtown Alternative
This alternative would reduce the overall size of the downtown
commercial district by redesignating targeted properties along
the downtown periphery to residential zoning. Although this
alternative discusses all the targeted properties, an option
would be to do only a select group. The general rationale for
considering a reduction is that over the last 30 years or more,
the demand for commercial space has been almost negligible and
some vacant properties have been unable to attract developers.
Furthermore, much of the downtown periphery is already
residential.
Potential Advantages: (1) eliminates vacant and underutilized
commercial properties and deficient/deteriorating commercial
structures located along the downtown periphery; (2) new
residential properties will provide more housing opportunities
and will increase property tax revenues; (3) close proximity of
shops to new residential development will increase casual
pedestrian shopper activity; and (4). creates more demand for the
remaining downtown commercial area as a unified shopping
district.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) reduction of downtown commercial
properties, limiting opportunities for outside retailers to
relocate into existing downtown vacant/underutilized retail
space; (2) reduction in umber of commercial retail properties
that could offer employment opportunities; (3) greater
•
commercial concentration and proximity of new residents could
cause conflicts in terms of parking, accessibility, noise, and
lighting spillover effects; (4) creates momentum for business
flight to larger commercial districts with established shopper
base (domino theory); and (5) contributes to a perception of City
as "anti -business."
Mixed Use Alternative
This alternative would create a new land use designation,
Downtown Mixed Use, that would allow both residential and
commercial uses on the same property. Residential uses would be
permitted on the upper levels if the structure also contains
commercial uses. All commercial uses would be subject to the GC
General Commercial land use'standards, while all residential uses
would be subject to the HD High Density land use standards.
Properties containing both commercial and residential land uses
would be subject to both commercial and residential standards, as
applicable.
Potential Advantages: (1) allows a wide variety of potential
land uses throughout downtown, thereby providing greater
incentives for property owners to more fully invest in their
properties; (2) provides opportunities to increase the City's low
and moderate income housing stock; (3) provides opportunities for
larger local shopper base due to growth in downtown resident
population, thereby potentially increasing sale tax revenues and
the variety of retail outlets; (4) provides incentives to upgrade
existing underutilized properties, resulting in increased
property tax revenues; and (5) creates a distinctive urban
downtown environment that could contribute to a more positive
image of downtown.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) mixed use developments are
difficult to finance and insure, except for mixed use
developments with low and moderate income units, and few
developers are interested in this type of construction; (2) mixed
use developments may not fit the relatively low density
residential character of the City, creating potential conflicts
with surrounding residents in terms of circulation, parking,
lighting and noise impacts; (3) allowing residential development
in the downtown could effectively replace existing commercial
developments with high income residential units, leading to
opposition from local merchants on the perception that the City
is "anti -business."
Commercial/Residential Alternative
This alternative would create a new land use designation for the
downtown, Commercial/Residential, that would allow either
entirely commercial or entirely residential uses on each downtown
property. All commercial uses would be subject to the GC General
Commercial land use standards, while all residential uses would
be subject to the HD High Density land use standards.
•
Potential Advantages: (1) allows downtown property owners
greater incentives to invest in currently underutilized
properties, since residential beachfront developments would have
a higher investment return than commercial developments, leading
to greater property tax revenues; (2) provides opportunities for
larger local shopper base with potential growth in downtown
resident population; (3) provides greater options to property
owners, creating a more free market approach by maximizing the
economically highest and best property use.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) potential high density residential
development could lead to traffic congestion and create
commercial/residential conflicts; (2) allowing residential
development in the downtown could effectively replace existing
commercial developments with residential units, leading to
opposition from local merchants and an "anti -business" image for
the City;_(3) future residential development represents "lost
opportunities" to attract new commercial establishments into
downtown and increase the City's sales tax revenues.
Commercial Recreation Land Use Alternative
This alternative would create a new commercial land use
designation, Downtown Commercial, that specifically limits
permitted land uses to commercial activities considered
entertaining or recreational in nature. The intent is to
establish a well-defined image of downtown as a beachfront
"entertainment/restaurant row" that would be particularly
appealing to visitors from outside the community.
Potential Advantages: (1) opportunity to create a distinctive
and positive image of the downtown; (2) increased sales tax
revenues by emphasizing a greater concentration of land uses with
high sales returns per square foot of floor space, e.g. upscale
restaurants, jewelry and gift boutiques; (3) greater employment.
opportunities for local residents by encouraging labor-intensive
land uses such as restaurants; (4) greater selection and
diversity among the permitted types of uses by encouraging
greater concentrations of competing businesses; (5) encourages
property investment/upgrading to successfully market permitted
land uses, thereby increasing property tax revenues.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) the limited number of permitted
uses could prevent other types of retailers from coming to
downtown; (2) the limited permitted uses could contribute to an
"anti -business" image of the City, possibly driving away existing
businesses; (3) a "restaurant row" concept may appeal primarily
to cocktail lounge -oriented eating establishments, thus
increasing the potential for crime -related problems; (4) owners
of properties with land uses that become existing nonconforming
uses as a result of this alternative, e.g. residential, office,
could be discouraged from making future property
investments/upgradings; (5) this alternative requires activist
role by the City or Chamber of Commerce to successfully promote
downtown to prospective restaurant entreprenuers and customers.
•
Local Resident -Serving Alternative
This alternative would create a new commercial land use
designation, Downtown Commercial, that is specifically intended
to serve the shopping and employment needs of local residents.
While regional -serving commercial uses, e.g. live entertainment,
would also be permitted, the emphasis of this alternative is to
encourage those commercial retail and service enterprises that
cater to local consumer demands and discourage other uses.
Potential Advantages: (1) opportunity to increase sale tax
revenues by focusing on specific, built-in market; (2) local
resident -serving retail establishments would be less likely to
attract outside patrons who produce public service demands
without contributing to the'costs of such services, e.g. police
calls; and (3) local resident shoppers tend to be a more stable,
year-round, long-term group in terms of consumption patterns than
beach visitors and other outside groups.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) concentration on local shopping
needs could forego opportunities to establish new
regionally -oriented entertainment establishments; (2) local
residents may represent too small a consumer group to make this
alternative economically viable; and (3) the type of retail
establishments targeted in this alternative, e.g. household
goods, personal services, would directly compete with regional
malls and shopping centers located throughout the South Bay.
Residential Alternative
This alternative would change the land use designation of all
commercial downtown properties to HD High Density Residential.
All existing commercial land uses would become legal
nonconforming uses subject to a specific amortization period.
This alternative is based on the assumption that any
revitalization efforts for the downtown commercial retail base
would have a low probability of success. The local retail market
has already been saturated by commercial centers in other
surrounding municipalities. Given the downtown's built-in
competitive and locational disadvantages, downtown consumer
demand will continue to be limited to local resident and seasonal
beach visitors.
Potential Advantages: (1) new residential construction and
property improvement/upgrading would result in greater property
tax revenues; (2) conversion of downtown nightclubs and taverns
to residential uses would reduce downtown crime rates; (3)
elimination of downtown taverns and public areas removes
incentive for transients to utilize beachfront areas; (4) removal
of marginal businesses with low sales tax revenue and high
turnover rates; and (5) increase in residential properties would
help the City meet its share of the SCAG Regional Housing Needs.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) permanent loss of unique beachfront
retail district; (2) loss of sales and business license tax
revenues; (3) displacement of existing downtown retailers and
residents through property conversions could result in litigation
against City; (4) existing marginal downtown businesses may
continue indefinitely as legal nonconforming uses while
challenging the legality of the amortization process,
discouraging potential residential developments; (5) severe
opposition from the Chamber of Commerce and other local business
organizations which could result in litigation against City; and
(6) contributes to an "anti -business" image of the City that
could drive away businesses located outside of downtown, further
reducing sales tax and business license. revenues.
Status Quo Alternative
This alternative would not change any land use designation in or
around the downtown commercial district. The future of downtown
would be generally dependent upon market conditions with little
public sector intervention.
Potential Advantages: (1) no potentially hostile controversy
from opponents to land use changes.
Potential Disadvantages: (1) the present downtown land use
conditions are unlikely to improve by market forces alone, e.g.
property underutilization, marginal retail businesses, high
business turnover rates, mixed/incompatible uses, and
alcohol-related police calls; and (2) the unaddressed
underutilization of downtown represents lost opportunities to
generate more sales, property and business license tax revenues.
XI. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
Substandard property maintenance is a blighting influence that
can substantially reduce the aesthetic and economic value of
surrounding properties. The most common residential property
maintenance problems in the City are usually not severe in terms
of public health and safety, e.g. weathered facades, overgrown
vegetation. However, there have been instances reported of
property neglect that is capable of endangering occupants or
nearby residents, e.g. rodent infestation.
The only specific property maintenance regulations for the City
are found in Chapter 20, Nuisances, of the Hermosa Beach
Municipal Code. Other property maintenance regulations enforced
by the City are the State Building Code structural and use
standards.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City formulate a property maintenance
ordinance that provides a.. specific abatement process.
XII. DESIGNREVIEW
The application of specific design standards to the plan review
process can result in a higher aesthetic quality in future
developments. If such standards are clearly articulated and
consistently applied, design review also allows for more
• predictability in the planning process for both applicants and
local officials. However, in order for design review to be
effective, the intent of such a program should be well defined
from the outset.
Recommendation
The City's Precise Development Plan procedures presently
authorizes the Planning Commission to conduct generalized,
nonspecific design review as part of its overall site plan review
duties for projects requiring discretionary approvals.
Alternatives to this approach could involve the creation of an
independent Design Review Committee with separate membership,
delegation of specified design review duties to the Planning
Director/Planning Department, or retention of an outside
consultant to perform design reviews and provide recommendations
to the Planning Department.
XIII. HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The legal background and State registration procedures for
historic properties and sites is discussed in this section. The
requirements for a Certified Local Ordinance and Certified Local
Government status is also outlined.
Recommendation
An exhaustive list of properties and sites that could qualify as
Locally Significant Resources is provided. No specific
recommendations are made regarding the qualifications of any of
these potential historic candidates.
p/execsum
•
GENERAL GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND
IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES
•
•
•
GENERAL GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES
Legend: E - Local Government Power Expansion
R - Local Government Power Reduction
N/C - No Change in Level of Local Government Power
S - State Mandated
GOAL 1: Protect, improve and maintain the quality of life and
the small town beach community atmosphere of Hermosa
Beach. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1.1: Pregerve the existing character of all
residential neighborhoods. N/C
Implementation Objective 1.1-1: Require discretionary review of
future developments and modifications that conflict with the
character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. N/C with
E potential
Implementation Policy 1.1-1: Residential developments at greater
densities than permitted by the General Plan land use designation
are prohibited. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Minimize conflicts between nonresidential
• land uses and residential properties. N/C with E potential
Implementation Objective 1.2-1: Restrict any types of land use
conversions or forms of ownership which directly or indirectly
result in land uses and/or land intensities that are incompatible
with the surrounding uses. N/C with E potential
Implementation Objective 1.2-2: Prevent the establishment or
continuation of any incompatible nonresidential land uses on
properties with a residential General Plan land use designation.
N/C for establishment; E for continuation
Implementation Policy 1.2-1: All nonresidential land uses
adjacent to residential properties must provide buffers and/or
building setbacks to adequately protect nearby residential
properties from adverse impacts. N/C
Implementation Policy 1.2-2: An adequate separation must be
provided from the lot line of a residential property to the
exterior building wall of future nonresidential land uses
characterized by potentially objectionable operations, e.g. adult
businesses, alcohol beverage establishments. N/C
•
•
Implementation Policy 1.2-3: Nonresidential land uses are
prohibited from subjecting nearby residential properties to
objectionable air, noise, glare and other environmental impacts.
N/C
GOAL 2: Accommodate existing and future commercial land uses to
provide service to both local residents and regional
visitors. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2.1: Maintain the "small town" retail and
service character of commercially designated properties located
along existing commercial corridors. N/C
Implementation Objective 2.1-1: Establish specific maximum
building intensity standards, e.g. floor area ratio, for every
commercial zone. S
Implementation Objective 2.1-2: Establish maximum building
height standards for every General Plan commercial land use
designation. N/C
Implementation Objective 2.1-3: Require discretionary review of
commercial or industrial uses that could create adverse
environmental impacts for the surrounding area. N/C
Implementation Policy 2.1-1: The establishment of incompatible
land uses, e.g. residential or industrial, on properties located
in commercial shopping districts is prohibited. N/C
Implementation Policy 2.1-2: Commercial developments must
provide sufficient off-street parking spaces or provide other
means to minimize parking shortages. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2.2: Promote the establishment and improvement
of commercial enterprises which contribute to the vitality and
diversity of the City's commercial base. N/C
Implementation Objective 2.2-1: Require pedestrian -oriented
design in commercial structures along Pier Avenue and within the
commercial downtown district. N/C
GOAL 3: Encourage land uses which enhance and promote the City's
coastal environment and quality of life. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 3.1: Accommodate coastal -related recreation
and commercial uses which serve the year-round needs of visitors
and residents. N/C
Implementation Objective 3.1-1: Provide a specific list of
coastal -related recreation and commercial uses for the downtown
district and specific definitions of such uses. E
Implementation Objective 3.1-2: Allow special weekend daytime
events in the downtown district that will serve both residents
and visitors without infringing on private property rights. -N/C
Implementation Objective 3.1-3: Allow the continued use of the
City's public beaches for coastal recreational uses. N/C
Implementation Policy 3.1-1: All future coastal -related
developments must be designed with a high level of architectural
design quality which reflects the City's unique coastal location.
E
GOAL 4: Provide for the development and maintenance of public
infrastructure to adequately serve the needs of
residents and permitted land uses. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 4.1: Continue operation and maintenance of
public infrastructure. N/C
•
Implementation Objective 4.1-1: Commit the necessary public
funds and_personnel for public infrastructure improvements and
repairs. N/C
GOAL 5: Provide community resource facilities which will
adequately support the needs of local residents and
businesses. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 5.1: Maintain adequate funding and personnel
for the provision of recreational, educational, and cultural
programs and facilities. N/C
Implementation Objective 5.1-1: Establish monitoring program of
public demand for various programs and facilities to ensure
commitment of adequate funding and staff to meet current and
anticipated user needs. E
Implementation Objective 5.1-2: Allow for appropriate private
interests to use and or lease surplus public properties and
facilities. N/C
Implementation Objective 5.1-3: Accommodate religious,
educational and day care facilities in residential neighborhoods,
provided such facilities are compatible in function, scale and
character to the immediate neighborhood. N/C
GOAL 6: Maintain existing land use standards and controls for
the commercial and industrial districts. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 6.1: Protect surrounding residential
neighborhoods from adverse environmental impacts. N/C
Implementation Objective 6.1-1: Mitigate impacts of expansion of
commercial development in relation to adjacent residential land
uses. N/C
Implementation Policy 6.1-1: The expansion of industrial land
uses into adjacent residential properties is prohibited. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 6.2: Encourage community participation in
significant discretionary land use decisions. N/C
GOAL 7: Preserve public open spaces and scenic vistas throughout
the City. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 7.1: Ensure that future development will not
encroach on or diminish public open spaces, public views, or
unique natural resources. N/C
Implementation Policy 7.1-1 Establish specific criteria for
preserving and protecting public open spaces and views. N/C
GOAL 8: The City should engage in planning activities to
encourage commercial development to maintain a
sufficient revenue base to ensure the adequate provision
of public services and facilities. N/C
GOAL 9: Encourage equitable community access and participation
on all discretionary land use decisions. N/C
CURRENT LAND USE ELEMENT
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Revise the City's Land Use Element text to:
(1) include discussions on the general types of permitted uses
for the Mobile Home Park, General Commercial,. and Open Space land
use designations; and (2) include building intensity standards
for all nonresidential land use designations. S
INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN MAP
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Obtain consistency between the General Plan
map and the zoning map for all properties within the City. S
Implementation Objective 1.1: The following land use changes
shall be made: N/C
Area 1: 737 and 739 Longfellow Avenue. Redesignate to LD Low
Density from GC General Commercial.
Area 2: 734, 736, 738, 740, and 744 Longfellow Avenue; 733, 735,
737, and 739 30th Street. Redesignate to LD Low Density from GC
General Commercial.
Area 3: the grassy undeveloped northerly portion of the Hermosa
Valley School site. Rezone to OS Open Space from R-3 Multiple
Family Residential.
Area 4: 803, 805, 807, 809, 811, 813, 815, 817, and 819 18th
Street; 802 and 804 19th Street; 181, 1820, 1822, 1830, 1834,
1840 and 1850 Pacific Coast Highway. Rezone from R-2 to
Commercial S.P.A. Specific Plan Area.
Area 5: 1906, 1918, 1924, and 1934 Pacific Coast Highway.
Rezone from R-2 to Commercial S.P.A. Specific Plan Area.
Area 6: 825, 827, 831, 833, 835, 841, and 844 13th Street; 830,
• 840 and 850 14th Street. Redesignate to MD Medium Density from
GC General Commercial (with the exception of the R-1 lot, which
should be redesignated to LD Low Density).
Area 7: 1235, 1245, 1251, and 1255 Prospect Avenue. Redesignate
lot #40 to GC General Commercial and rezone the remaining parcels
to R-1 One Family Residential from C-3 General Commercial.
Area 8: 725 10th Street and 730 llth Street. Rezone these
properties to R-2 Two Family Residential from C-3 General
Commercial.
Area 9: 603 1st Place, 620 2nd Street, and 112, 138 and 142
Ardmore Avenue. Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family
Residential from M-1 Light Manufacturing.
Area 10: 603, 605, 607, 609, 611, 613, 615, and 623 3rd Street;
322, 330 and 342 Ardmore Avenue. Rezone these properties to R-2
Two Family Residential from M-1 Light Manufacturing.
Area 11: 611, 615, and 635 4th Street; and 422-436 Ardmore
Avenue. Rezone these properties to R-2 Two Family Residential
from M-1 Light Manufacturing.
• BUILDING INTENSITY/POPULATION DENSITY STANDARDS
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Bring the Land Use Element into compliance
with State law. S
Implementation Objective 1.1: Include specific floor area ratios
(FARs) for all nonresidential land use designations. Based on
the existing development character of nonresidential properties,
an FAR of 1:1 should be considered. Proposed developments with
an FAR greater than 1:1 would require Planning Commission
approval. S
Implementation Objective 1.2: Provide a linkage between limits
on the number of dwellingunits per acre and the desired
population by establishing estimates on the average number of
persons per dwelling unit. Establish population threshold at
buildout using the 1990 Census statistic of 1.98 Persons Per
Occupied Housing Unit for the City and the existing residential
standards on maximum dwelling units per acre. S
Implementation Objective 1.3: Establish density/intensity
standard for the Mobile Home Park (MHP) land use designation.
The existing low density character of the City's mobile home
stock, totaling a gross density of 13.5 units per acre, and the
low density structural height and bulk characteristics of mobile
homes makes the LD Low Density standard of 13 units per acre
appropriate for the MHP designation. S
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2: Encourage maximum development potential of
all nonresidential properties. N/C
Implementation Objective 2.1: Establish floor area ratios (FARs)
for all nonresidential land use designations (see Implementation
Objective 1.1). S
Implementation Objective 2.2: Allow off-site public parking
and/or private parking within a reasonable distance to satisfy
parking requirements. E
LAND USE DESIGNATION REVISIONS
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Eliminate R -P zoning and replace with R-3
zoning, or create a new General Plan land use designation for
residential/office mixes. N/C
Implementation Objective 1.1: Revise zoning map to reflect
replacement of R -P zone with R-3 zone, or prepare new text and
revise the General Plan Land Use Map for a mixed
residential/office designation. N/C
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2: Examine substandard lots such as the
Shakespeare Tract for possible changes in General Plan
designation and / or zoning designation and also explore creative
design standards such as zero lot lines.
LAND USE AND STRUCTURAL DEFINITIONS
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Provide clear and unambiguous guidance to
decision -makers regarding land use entitlements by formulating
precise zoning definitions for commercial and residential land
uses and structural improvements. E
Implementation Objective 1.1: Prepare a zoning amendment to
include definitions for all permitted uses, dual/multiple uses,
and the following structural improvements and development
features: attic, basement, grade, floor area, loft, and story.
E
Implementation Policy 1.1-2: All lodging establishments, or
portions thereof, that allow guests to stay more than 30
consecutive days shall be subject to the multiple dwelling
parking standards, regardless of whether kitchen facilities are
provided. E
PARKING VIS-A-VIS LAND USE
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Maximize the use of public and private
parking vis-a-vis all commercial land uses. E
Implementation Objective 1.1: Allow private sector construction
and operation of downtown public parking structures. E
Implementation Objective 1.2: Study all publicly owned
properties for feasibility as potential parking structure sites,
including but not limited to Lots A, B, C, and D, Civic Center
lots, and the Community Center lot. E
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2: Allow shared parking arrangements for both
existing commercial uses and future commercial developments. E
Implementation Objective 2.1: Prepare potential reduced parking
requirement schedule for shared parking facilities. E
Implementation Objective 2.2: Assist commercial properties with
potential for shared parking facilities. E
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE -3: Refine parking requirements. E
Implementation Objective 3.1: Allow more "intense" commercial
uses to locate into substandard commercial properties previously
occupied by uses exempt from parking regulations if the required
parking spaces over and above the parking requirement for the
previous use can be provided on a discretionary basis. E
Implementation Objective 3.2: Assist future "intensive" use
applicants to identify potential methods of satisfying the
parking requirement from land use intensification, including
off-site shared parking and tandem parking. E
OPEN SPACE/PUBLIC FACILITIES DESIGNATIONS
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Create a special Public Facilities overlay
district for all properties presently designated Open Space or
Unclassified that contain educational buildings, public utility
structures and corridors, public governmental buildings, public
malls and plazas, and transit uses. S
Implementation Objective 1.1: Prepare zoning text for Public
Facilities overlay district, which allows for adequate building
height and mass, e.g. C-3 standards, and revise General Plan map
and zoning map to include overlay district boundaries. S
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2: Revise zoning text to identify only those
types of uses which typically are found in Open Space zones.
Examples of these uses are as follows: S
1. Aquatic sports facilities
2. Historic monuments
3. Parks
4. Picnic facilities
•
•
5. Playgrounds and children's recreational equipment
6. Recreational facilities and ancillary uses (indoor and
outdoor)
7. Special events and group events authorized pursuant to
Sections 22-1 and 22-5 of the Municipal Code
8. Spectator seating
9. Sports fields and courts
10. Trails for walking, jogging, bicycling and/or skating
USES OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR PRIVATE PURPOSES
GOAL 1: To evaluate all city right-of-ways to determine whether
or not there is any future public use and which
right-of-ways could possibly be controlled by the
encroachment process or vacated to decrease visual
blight. N/C
Objective 1.1: Evaluate what right-of-ways could be controlled
through the zoning ordinance which would trigger vacation. N/C
Objective 1.2: Examine what new zoning ordinances would be
necessary for application toward these right-of-ways. N/C
Objective 1.3: A cost / benefit analysis needs to be made to
determine what encroachment permit process is the optimum
solution for private use of the public right-of-way areas for
which the City has determined future need. E
Objective 1.4: Prior to either using the vacation method, or
the encroachment permit process for unused public right-of-way
areas, a thorough examination of the method of implementation,
i.e., enforcement procedure, shall be made to determine the most
effective procedure, and shall be made a criterion in deciding
which method should be used.
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Ensure that all properties in the City are
adequately maintained in order to protect the public safety,
health and welfare. N/C
Implementation Objective 1.1: Amend the Municipal Code to
specifically list all types of property maintenance deficiencies
and establish an enforcement program. E
•
•
DESIGN REVIEW
GOAL 1: The Downtown Business Area Enhancement Commission should
review all major development plans prior to
discretionary approval or implementation when a proposed
project is located within their jurisdictional
boundaries. E
Primary Objective 1: Provide the Downtown Business Area
Enhancement Commission with all applicable information as it
pertains to the downtown without increasing the permit processing
time. E
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2: Incorporate design review into the regular
site plan review procedures of the Planning Commission for
Specfic Plan Area (S.P.A.) zones, excluding single family
residential, and major Capital Improvement Projects (C.I.P). E
Implementation Objective 2.1: Establish general guidelines for
Planning Commission design review. Guidelines should be based on
compatibility with surrounding properties to present a harmonious
appearance. Planning Commission prohibitions on specific
architectural features which are compatible with the surrounding
area for reasons solely due to matters of personal taste are
considered beyond the scope of the Planning Commission's duties.
E
Examples of general guidelines for design review are as follows:
1. The height, bulk, and other design features of all
structures should be in proportion to the building site
with a balance and unity among external features so as
to present a harmonious appearance.
2. The site layout, orientation, and location of structures
and their relationship to one another and to open
spaces, parking areas, pedestrian walks, signs,
illumination, and landscaping should be interrelated and
arranged as to achieve a safe, efficient, and harmonious
development.
3. Each building shall reflect due consideration of a total
design concept which shall be an integral part of the
design treatment and architectural detail accomplished
in a professional manner consistent with good design
practices.
4. The grading and development should be accomplished with
due regard for the qualities of the natural terrain and
landscape; trees, shrubs, and other natural features
should not be indiscriminately destroyed.
5 The design, size, lighting, placement, and character of
signs should be appropriately related to the structures
and grounds, and be in harmony with the general
•
•
development of the site and the surrounding
neighborhood.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 1: Establish a historic preservation program.
E
Implementation Objective 1.1: Establish a set of guidelines to
determine what criteria should apply in determining what type of
buildings, structures, or sites should be considered for
historical preservation. E
Implementation Objective 1.2: Investigate State and federal
historic preservation programs applicable to local resources. E
Implementation Policy 1.2: Participation in any program shall.
be voluntary and if possible, a building that qualifies for
historical preservation should be made afforded the opportunity
for tax exemptions as an incentive. E
Implementation Policy 1.3: Examine what is to be achieved by
the preservation of various historical sites. N/C
p/goalsum
•
COMMERCIAL.SPACE ALTERNATIVE
•
•
•
COMMERCIAL SPACE ALTERNATIVE
I. General/Purpose
This alternative would encourage the utilization of the
commercial zone and decrease the parking requirements to maximize
the amount of commercial space.
Amortization of nonconforming residential uses is considered to
be the most realistic approach to maximizing downtown commercial
space. Allowing greater building heights in downtown is not
feasible with the November 1991 voter approval of Proposition I,
a local initiative which lowered commercial building heights in
the C-2 zone (the downtown zoning designation) to 30 feet from 35
feet. Converting the existing downtown parking lots to
commercial uses would simply exacerbate the existing public
parking shortage, possibly discouraging shoppers from patronizing
downtown merchants. Expanding the downtown commercial district
boundaries by redesignating residential properties adjacent to
the downtown periphery to GC General Commercial is not considered
feasible by staff due to the following practical difficulties:
1. Market forces do not justify expanding the amount of
land in a downtown district that has been economically
depressed since the 1950's and, with a few notable
exceptions, is characterized by marginal retail
establishments and constant business turnovers.
2. Several downtown commercial properties are presently
used for residential purposes, and have been residential
in character for many years, indicating a greater demand
for residential than commercial uses in and around
downtown.
3. The existing residential properties abutting the
downtown district are presently fully developed for
residential uses. Redesignation of these residential
properties would create legal nonconforming structures,
with the associated restrictions on structural
improvements/expansions, and possibly lead to
displacement of renters.
4. The adjacent residential properties are of diminutive
proportions by today's standards, reflecting the period
of the City's history in which these properties were
originally subdivided. Construction of any multi -tenant
commercial space would require lot consolidation efforts
that would be difficult for the private sector alone
even in a healthy economy with strong local market
demand. Given the lack of demand for additional
downtown commercial space, private sector commitment to
this type of commercial development would be remote at
best.
II. Potential Advantages
• .1. Larger stock of downtown commercial structures provides
opportunity for greater variety of retailers and greater
selection of retail goods
•
2. New commercial construction would result in greater
property tax revenues
3. Greater shopping opportunities that could attract a
larger and more diversified shopper base
4. Opportunity for greater sales and business license tax
revenues
5. Potential for increased employment opportunities
6. Promote downtown as a unified shopping district
characterized by a variety of restaurants and specialty
shops
III. Potential Disadvantages
1. Reduction in housing stock that could adversely impact
City's supply of low and moderate income housing units
2. Potential increase in alcohol-related commercial uses
3. Greater intensification of day and night-time shoppers
could create conflicts with nearby residents in terms of
parking, accessibility, noise and lighting spillover
effects
IV. Existing Downtown Conditions
The addresses, Assessor Parcel Numbers, lot square footage,
existing land uses, and conditions of existing structures for all
commercially zoned downtown properties that are presently used
only for residential purposes are listed in Appendix A. Many
residential structures on these properties exhibit signs of
deferred maintenance.
Downtown presently has a total land area of 757,606 square feet
and total floor area of 344,852 square feet for a total floor
area ratio (FAR) of 0.46:1. Downtown presently has a total of
1,583 public and private parking spaces.
V. Future Downtown Conditions
The following floor space.estimates represent the maximum
potential commercial development that the entire downtown could
support under current zoning standards. The calculations on
maximum build -out for the entire downtown are based on the
following assumptions:
- All future downtown commercial structures would be
developed to provide the maximum amount of floor space
possible, in conformance with the existing 30 foot
height limitations, while allowing adequate space on the
property for the full provision of all required
off-street parking spaces, either at ground level of
above ground.
- No non-commercial developments on any downtown
properties (in order to estimate the maximum amount of
retail floor space possible under current zoning).
- Commercial uses are broken down into two major
categories, retail/office and restaurant, for convenient
analysis. These retail and restaurant categories are
distinguished by different off-street parking
requirements: one space per 250 square feet of gross
floor area for retail/office uses and one space per 100
square feet of gross floor area for restaurant uses.
- For calculation purposes, each required parking space
represents 400 square feet of floor in order to account
for all parking stall, aisle and drive area space needed
for an adequate parking lot. This 400 square foot per
space average is a recommended standard that comes from
APA Report Number 405, New Residential Standards for
Nonresidential Uses, 1987.
- Restaurants currently make up approximately 23% of all
floor space in downtown. This scenario assumes that the
downtown retail mix will retain roughly the same
proportion of restaurants, with restaurants making up
25% of total downtown land and the remaining 75% devoted
to general retail/office uses.
TABLE 7
MAXIMUM POTENTIAL RETAIL/OFFICE DEVELOPMENT (75% OF DOWNTOWN)
(Square Feet)
Total Total Total
Land Area Floor Area Parking Area
568,205 655,621 1,048,993
•
•
TABLE 8
MAXIMUM POTENTIAL RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT (25% OF DOWNTOWN)
(Square Feet)
Total Total Total
Land Area Floor Area Parking Area
189,401 113,641 454,563
• TABLE. 9
MAXIMUM POTENTIAL COMBINED COMMERCIAL USES DEVELOPMENT
(Square Feet)
Total Total Total
Land Area Floor Area Parking Area
757,606 769,262 1,503,556
The total number of parking spaces required for the maximum
potential downtown development would be 2,622retail/office
spaces and 1,136 restaurant spaces. The parking area allocation
only assumes that all spaces are off-street and above ground,
with no determination on the potential ratio of surface level
spaces to parking structure spaces. This determination is not
necessary for aggregate projections since parking for some
commercial land uses may be within the same parcels or entirely
on separate parcels. Therefore, the FAR for any given parcel
could theoretically be as much as 3:1 or under 1:1. The
aggregate FAR for the entire downtown under this scenario is
approximately 1.02:1, which represents the total floor space of
all retail/office and restaurant land uses divided by the total
land area of all downtown properties.
The future potential development of uses consistent with the C-2
zoning for these properties would mean the loss of 77 existing
dwelling units. Applying. the 1990 Census average of 1.98 persons
per household for the City, this could result in the displacement
of 152 local residents.
VI. Potential Environmental Impacts
Traffic/Circulation - The loss of existing residential units on
the downtown commercially zoned properties would reduce the
overall number of residential vehicle trips but would create the
potential for additional shopper and downtown employee vehicle
trips. Assuming that these commercially zoned properties are
developed for retail uses rather than office uses, this would
result in less vehicles trips during weekday AM and PM peak
commuting periods and more vehicle trips during evening and
weekend shopping hours.
Based on an average of 3 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of
gross commercial retail floor area on a weekday and an average of
5 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of gross commercial retail
floor area on a weekend day (Trip Generation, 4th Edition,
Institute of Transportation Engineers), the maximum potential
future commercial development for the entire downtown under this
scenario could result in approximately 2,308 Average Daily Trips
(ADT) on a weekday and 3,846 ADT on a weekend day. In
comparison, the existing 344,852 square feet of commercial floor
space in the existing downtown would generate 1,0.35 weekday ADT
and 1,724 weekend ADT. Assuming that the existing 77 dwelling
units in downtown each have two commuters that result in four
weekday trips per unit and that weekend travel patterns result in
six trips per unit on a weekend day, the existing downtown
residential uses generate 308 weekday ADT and 462 weekend ADT.
The present land uses in downtown therefore generate
approximately 1,343 weekday ADT and 2,186 weekend ADT. Under
this scenario, maximum commercial development would result in a
72% increase in weekday ADT and a 76% increase in weekend ADT,
which would result in significant traffic volume increases.
These calculations do not account for beach visitor trips; since
it is assumed that these trips would occur regardless of the
amount of commercial downtown space.
Air and Noise - Since total vehicle ADT could significantly
increase with future commercial development, this scenario could
result in significant mobile air and noise impacts. There may
also be significant increases in evening and weekend pedestrian
noise impacts from future additional commercial retail space.
Since a large portion of this new commercial development would be
located on properties along the downtown periphery, there is a
potential for significant noise impacts on nearby residences from
shopper activities, particularly during late evening and weekend
shopping hours.
Public Services/Utilities - The replacement of existing
residential uses on commercially zoned properties with commercial
uses would increase the demand for police services, particularly
if the future commercial uses involve activities that have higher
police call rates, e.g. establishments with on -sale alcohol
licenses. There is no accurate method of estimating the
additional demand for police services, since a great many
variables would determine the increased demand, such as the
number of businesses with alcohol licenses, the hours of
operation, the layout and intensity of new construction, and the
time of day and season of the year. However, under maximum
build -out it could be anticipated that growth in downtown
businesses could result in a need for a regular dedication of two
full-time officers and a patrol car or even the establishment of
a downtown police substation, staffed by a minimum of a
commander, two officers per shift, and at least two support
personnel.
Depending on the type of future commercial uses, there could also
be an increase in solid waste generation, since many types of
retail and office uses result in greater quantities of discarded
paper and other refuse than residential uses, resulting in a
greater demand for refuse collection services. The loss of
residential units could mean a decrease in the demand for school,
library, health care, water and sewer services, since residential
uses typically have greater demands for these types of services
than most commercial uses. The demand for fire protection
services, particularly fire inspections, would increase with the
additional commercial development.
Population/Housing - As previously mentioned, this scenario would
result in a loss of 77 existing residential units and the
displacement of about 152 residents, based on the 1990 Census
average of 1.98 persons per household for the City. This would
represent approximately 0.8% of the total 9,689 housing units and
0.8% of the total 18,219 retidents.for the City as reported by
the 1990 Census. To the extent that some of these dwelling units
could be considered affordable for low or moderate income
households, any loss of such units could be considered a
significant impact. However, given the high land value of
beachfront property, it is unlikely that the rental rates or
purchase prices of these existing residential units would be
within the low and moderate income ranges.
Earth - Assuming that all future development would not involve
any underground construction for parking garages or basements,
any potential soil or ground surface disruptions would be limited
to grading activities during the initial construction phases.
Any changes in downtown topography and ground surface relief
features would only potentially involve minor landscaping
features, e.g. decorative slopes, on individual properties.
Water - Future commercial development on properties presently
used for residential purposes could result in some increases in
impervious surfaces, since existing residential lawns could be
replaced with building or pavement cover. Although this could
result in an increase in the rate and amount of surface water
runoff and a decrease in the current absorption rates, the
impacts would be less than significant since only a small amount
of total land would be subject to potential conversion from open
space to impervious surfaces. There would be no change in any
potential exposure of people or property to water -related hazards
such as flooding or tidal waves.
Aesthetics/Recreation - Maximum development could result in
higher commercial structures than the existing one and two story
residential structures on these commercially zoned properties.
Since the existing residential structures are all below the
maximum height of 30 feet allowed in, the C-2 zone, future
commercial development could potentially obstruct some scenic
views from surrounding properties. This would be considered a
less than significant impact, however, since all development
would be in conformance with the C-2 zoning standards. Potential
commercial development would not have an impact on the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities since the change
in uses on these properties would not impact beach access.
Historic/Cultural Resources - Since none of the existing
residential structures on these commercially zoned properties are
considered to be of local historic significance, there would not
be any impacts to historic sites, structures, buildings or
objects.
VII. Fiscal Impacts
Based on the 1990 Census median value of $431,000 for
owner -occupied units, the 77 dwelling units located on
commercially zoned downtown properties would have a total
assessed value of $33,187,000. This assessed valuation would
provide the City with approximately $79,649 in annual property
tax revenues, based on the $0.24 for every dollar of the basic 1%
property tax levy allocated•to the City. However, since many of
the existing residential structures are older buildings and may
be assessed at artificially low values if there have been no
property improvements or resales in recent years, most of these
residential structures probably have assessed valuations below
the City median, particularly in the case of older multi -unit
structures. Due to the beachfront locations of these properties,
most of the assessed valuation would be for the land value rather
than the improvement value. Therefore, it is probable that new
commercial construction would result in higher assessed values
that would produce greater property tax revenues for the City.
There are a total of 14 commercial parcels in downtown, totaling
approximately 38,228 square feet, that are presently used for
residences only. The maximum potential commercial development of
these parcels would yield about 38,993 square feet of commercial
floor space, applying the FAR of 1.02:1 that results from maximum
development when all required parking spaces are provided on
these parcels at or above ground. Full commercial development
could result in approximately $37,039 in annual sales tax
revenues, estimated by multiplying the total square feet of
retail and restaurant floor space by $0.9499, which is the
current amount of annual sales tax revenue per square foot of
gross floor space for downtown.
Depending upon the type of future commercial uses, this scenario
could result in several thousand dollars in business license fee
revenues to the City annually. These fees are based on total
gross receipts for most retail operations and on total floor
space for retailers with an on -sale alcohol license.
VIII. Potential Coastal Commission Reaction
The replacement of nonconforming residential uses with commercial
uses may be consistent with Coastal Commission policies depending
upon the type of future commercial uses. Visitor -serving
commercial recreational uses, e.g. gift shops, would be given a
higher priority by the Commission than office uses. The
California Coastal Act of 1976, Section 30222, states that "the
use of private lands suitable for visitor -serving commercial
recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities
for coastal recreation shall have priority over private
residential, general industrial, or general commercial
development". Although the Coastal Act does not specifically
define "visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities," the
City's Land Use Element currently defines commercial recreational
land uses as various commercial activities such as bowling
alleys, motels, theaters, entertainment establishments,
night-clubs, shops and similar businesses. The establishment of
any of these types of commercial uses could be expected to be
supported by the Commission.
IX. Relationship to R/UDAT
The Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team (R/UDAT) program,
sponsored by the American Institute of Architects (AIA), has
recently completed a team study of. downtown Hermosa Beach. The
purpose of the R/UDAT study is to identify key issues through
workshops -and community input sessions in order to develop a
conceptual action plan for downtown revitalization. The intent
of this alternative, to increase the amount of commercial
development in the downtown, would be consistent with the
economic revitalization goals of the R/UDAT study. Specific
R/UDAT recommendations such as the sale and commercial
development of the Biltmore site is consistent with a downtown
revitalization approach that favors the maximum utilization of
downtown properties.
X. Implementation
Any implementation of this alternative would require an
amortization program to successfully induce any additional
downtown commercial uses. The lack of an amortization program
would allow the opportunity for the existing nonconforming uses
to continue indefinitely. However, even with an amortization
program, the lack of market demand for additional downtown
commercial space could make implementation difficult (otherwise
market forces alone would have resulted in the replacement of
these nonconforming residential structures with commercial uses)
GOAL
A. Maximize commercial uses on downtown commercial properties.
OBJECTIVES
A. No expansion of the downtown nonconforming uses and encourage
businesses to more effeciently use the commercial potential
of the downtown district.
B. Encourage new businesses and more efficient commercial space
utilization of downtown district.
The following is a list of the R/UDAT guidelines to be used as a
basis for the planning of the downtown district:
•
1. Downtown Business District needs more landscaping to soften
the expance of pavement and make the area more pleasant for
pedestrians.
2. The street plantings on Pier Avenue should be different from
Hermosa Avenue. Street tree plantings should be moved from the
center of the street to the sidewalk to soften the commercial
facades.
3. In the curved, sloping section of Pier Avenue between Hermosa
Avenue and Manhattan Avenue a different, smaller type of street
tree should be used to avoid blocking views of the water.
4. The bike path needs to be separated from the Strand for
safety reasons.
5. Increase police foot patrols.
6. Increase outdoor dining and family entertainment activity
where appropriate.
7. Provide streetscape amenities.
8. Create more sidewalk area and a plaza area at the pierhead.
9. Reduce noise impacts of bars and restaurants.
10. Connect through to parking behind buildings, creating through
block retail arcades if possible.
11. A traffic circulation scheme should be provided at the Pier
Avenue / Strand junction which gives easy access to parking
areas. The recommended scheme allows drivers to go to the end of
Pier Avenue and park there if space is available. If not, they
can turn right to Lot C, or left to Lot A.
12. Manage the parking supply to reduce conflicts between
residents, beach goers, and customers.
13. Provide sufficient off and on -street parking to support
existing commercial uses and their proposed growth.
14. Provide beach -goers parking to the extent which is
practically feasible, but never below the levels decreed by the
Coastal Commission.
15. Fringe parking should be provided and its use promoted for
beach goers, employees and overflow resident parking.
16. The zoning in downtown should be amended to allow businesses
to expand without providing required parking for old or new uses.
410 17. Better information should be provided on visitor parking maps
with an explanation of fees.
•
•
•
18. The pedestrian environment should be improved on streets
leading to fringe parking facilities, amenities, store fronts,
etc°.,and should be designed to encourage the use of these routes.
19. Pier Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and the beach should be
modified to allow for more of an emphasis on pedestrian
activities in this socially active zone.
20. Underground all utilities.
21. Diversify the types of businesses to include a greater number
and variety of speciality shops, including gift, art and apparel
shops, along Pier Avenue, the Strand, and other east -west
streets.
•
22. Redesign of the pierhead area to improve the appearance of
the pier structure and provide a plaza -like setting for outdoor
events.
23. Revision of the traffic circulation pattern to provide a
single one-way traffic lane with angled parking west of Hermosa
Avenue. This revision provides more space for the pedestrian and
room for outdoor cafes.
•
•
Im••••••=..11.
MOBIL
HOME
PARK
ZONE
R-3
Expanded Downtown Business
Area EnhnncernenI Dis1riot
e
r
O.S.
Bard St.
0.S.
M-1
R-3
Cvoress Ave.
R-3
Loma Dr.
R-3
Sunset Dr.
LEGEND
Proposed Expanded
Area
Existing Downtown
Business Area
Enhancement District
Boundary
— 44 —
March 15, 1994
Honorable Mayor and members Regular meeting of
of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
REDUCING PARKING ENFORCEMENT TIME LIMIT
IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA
Recommendation:
1. Receive and file.
Background:
At the March 8, 1994, City Council meeting, staff was directed to study reducing parking
time limits from the current 8:00 p.m. enforcement limit to 5:00 p.m.
Analysis:
There are total of 1614 parking meters in the City of Hermosa Beach. The majority of the
meters are located in the residential district (1208 total). In these residential districts,
residents are allowed to purchase a parking permit for an amount of $27 annually which
permits them to use parking space at any permitted time. These meters are enforced 24
hours.
There are 247 total meters located in the downtown area (Exhibit 1). These meters are
enforced from 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM. The cost of the meters are $.25 per half an hour.
The following issues have been identified in regards to the reduction in parking meter
enforcement:
1. Revenue
The are 247 total parking meters in the downtown area. The total potential annual
revenue for the extended 3 hours is approximately $124,000. Reducing
enforcement hours will mean reducing parking revenue by maximum amount of
$124,000.
2. Allright Parking Operation
Reducing parking enforcement time limits in the vicinity of the Allright parking
operation will interfere with their ability to meet the requirements of their contract.
2
3. Providing new stickers for signs
The cost of providing new stickers for new time limits is approximately $4,000.
Downtown Implementation Plan
Staff is in the process of receiving proposals for the Downtown Implementation
Plan. The successful consultant will be studying the parking situation in the
downtown area. The results of the study will be important in making any
modifications to the parking in downtown.
5. Coastal Commission
Change of parking will normally require Coastal Commission's approval.
However, in this case reducing parking enforcement time limits will provide more
free parking for the beach goers, therefore Coastal Commission's approval might
not be necessary.
6. Enforcement
The City currently estimates $950,000 revenue annually from fines and tickets. If
enforcement hours are reduced, revenue collected will decrease. Using a
conservative estimate, if 35% of the total tickets issued are in the downtown area,
a three hour (27%) reduction in enforcement would equal $90,000. The impact
would probably be greater, since more tickets are issued in the evening hours.
Fiscal Impact:
Approval of reduction in parking meter enforcement will impact Downtown Enhancement
Commission Fund by $4,000. The City budget will be impacted by approximately
$214,000.
Respectfully submitted:
C�h Lc) CL,N IACL,v\
Amy Amirani
Director of Public Works
Val Straser
Chief of Police
Viki Copeland
Director of Finance
City Manager
MOBIL
HOME
PARK
ZONE
R-3
Promsad
Egpandad Downlzrm
arts Enhancament
e
r
e
n
u
e
0.S.
Bard St.
0.
0.S.
M-1
R-3
Cypress Ave..
R-3
Loma Dr.
R - 3
Sunset Dr.
c
ausinass
District
LEGEND
Existing Downtown
Business Area
Enhancement District
Boundary
3 Hour parking limit
$.25 per 1/2 hour
enforced 9: AM to 8:PM
March 16, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
March 22, 1994
BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES: REQUEST FOR RATE INCREASE
Recommendation:
1. Approve 4.18% rate increase for residential and commercial accounts effective
April 1, 1994 with condition that BFI not request another rate increase before
April 1995.
2. Adopt resolution
Background:
BFI has been under contract with the City for a number of years. The current five (5) year
contract runs from April 1, 1991 through March 30, 1996, with a provision for a five (5) year
renewal in 1996.
The contract provides for re -negotiation of rates based on the change in the Consumer Price Index
or other reasons that have an unusual change in the company's cost of operation. The section of
the contract dealing with rates is set forth below:
Re -Negotiation of Rates
The rates which may be charged by CONTRACTOR and the fees which are to be
paid by CONTRACTOR to CITY for the second and subsequent years of the term
of this Agreement, and any extensions thereof shall be adjusted by an amount up
to the percentage rate as reflected in the Consumer Price Index (Transportation
Group) Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside area as published in April of each
year by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI'), not to
exceed ten percent (10%) annually, with such adjustments to be effective July 1
of each year. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY true and correct copies of the
CPI which reflects the percentage increase to verify the rate adjustment. In
addition to the above, CONTRACTOR may petition the CITY at any time for
additional rate and price adjustments at reasonable times on the basis of
unusual changes in cost of operations, such as revised laws, ordinances, or
regulations; changes in location of disposal sites or changes in disposal
charges; and for other reasons.
t
The proposal submitted by BFI is for a 4.18% increase retroactive to January 1, 1994 for both
residential and commercial accounts. The proposal includes increasing the recycling charge by the
same amount. If the proposal is granted as submitted, the rates would be as follows:
PRESENT RATES
PROPOSED RATES
DIFFERENCE
SFD SOLID WASTE
$8.46
$8.81
$0.35
SFD RECYCLING
$1.23
$1.28
$0.05
TOTAL SFD
$9.69
$10.09
$0.40
MFD RECYCLING
OVER 5 UNITS
$1.88
$1.95
$0.07
COMMERCIAL
3 YARD
$69.69
$72.60
$2.91
The proposed rates are lower than either Manhattan Beach or Redondo Beach for similar services.
*Both Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach include a surcharge in their rates as allowed by
AB939 to cover their costs in complying with this State mandate. Manhattan Beach charges $0.55
per month while Redondo Beach has a $0.43 charge.
Analysis
BFI provides justification by citing the increase in the Consumer Price Index from April 1992
through December 1993 (See Exhibit "A"). The index increased from 145.8 to 151.9 which is
4.18%. Their last rate increase was July 1, 1992 for 5.49%.
The contract provides for rate changes to be effective July 1st. However, because they did not
request an increase last year, the City Council can approve an effective date other than July 1st.
Therefore, the soonest that staff would suggest is April 1, 1994 with a condition that there would
not be a request for an increase before April 1995.
The service level provided by BFI is good. Staff receives very few complaints and when we do the
company responds in a professional manner.
Respectfully submitted,
-/d/l/
Ste i en Burrell
City Manager
MANHATTAN BEACH
REDONDO BEACH
PROPOSED HERMO.SA
.....................................................................
...................................................................
BEACH'>>>>>>><>>>>'>><>:'>
............................. ......... ....
SFD
$11.25*$12.83*S
0 0 :::!;:'
*Both Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach include a surcharge in their rates as allowed by
AB939 to cover their costs in complying with this State mandate. Manhattan Beach charges $0.55
per month while Redondo Beach has a $0.43 charge.
Analysis
BFI provides justification by citing the increase in the Consumer Price Index from April 1992
through December 1993 (See Exhibit "A"). The index increased from 145.8 to 151.9 which is
4.18%. Their last rate increase was July 1, 1992 for 5.49%.
The contract provides for rate changes to be effective July 1st. However, because they did not
request an increase last year, the City Council can approve an effective date other than July 1st.
Therefore, the soonest that staff would suggest is April 1, 1994 with a condition that there would
not be a request for an increase before April 1995.
The service level provided by BFI is good. Staff receives very few complaints and when we do the
company responds in a professional manner.
Respectfully submitted,
-/d/l/
Ste i en Burrell
City Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 4.18% REFUSE RATE INCREASE
AND A 4.18% RECYCLING RATES INCREASE EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1994.
WHEREAS, the City Council entered into an agreement with Browning-Ferris Industries o
June 27, 1989 to provide refuse service; and,
WHEREAS, said agreement was amended on March 12, 1991 to add provisions for recycling; and,
WHEREAS, said agreement provides for annual rate adjustments in accordance with the consume
price index, transportation group, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside area; and,
WHEREAS, the consumer price index, transportation group, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim
Riverside area increased 4.18% from April 1992 through December 1993
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DOES HEREBY APPROVE A 4.18% REFUSE RATE INCREASE AND A 4.18%
RECYCLING RATE INCREASE EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1994 AS EVIDENCED BY
THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A".
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of March, 1994.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Charles S. Vose, City Attorney
Page 1
Waste
Systems
BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES
Los Angeles District
Mr. Stephen Burrell
City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
EXHIBIT "A"
Dear Mr. Burrell, •
• Recycled paper
RECEIVED
FEB 2 9 1994
CITY uR. OFFICE
February 14, 1994
Per n;ir recent conversation, it is time to pursue a rate.: increase for solid waste and
recycling services in the City of Hermosa Beach. This request is the first such request in
18 months, as the last increase granted by the City was effective on July 1, 1992. Thank
you for your time and attention.
Pursuant to our current contract with the City of Hermosa Beach, and with City Council
approval, BFI is allowed an increase in rates. to offset higher costs of doing business.
increase is based on Consumer Price Index for Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside as
published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. A copy
of the index from April 1992 (the basis for the last increase) and the most recent index
for December 1993 is enclosed.
The index in April 1992 was 145.8, compared with the December index of 151.9. The
increase in the index is 6.1, corresponding to a 4.18% increase. BFI hereby requests an
increase in that amount, and that the increase be backdated so it is effective January 1,
1994.
The current rates, and the proposed increased rates for commercial multiple family units
with bin/front end load service are attached. The rate comparison for single family
resi.dential solid waste and recycling services 2rf:!:
Service Type July 1992 Rate January 1994 Rate $ Increase
SFD Solid Waste $8.46
$8.81 $0.35
SFD Recycling $1.23 $1.28
Total SFD $9.69 $10.09
MFD Recycling
Over 5 units
$0.05
$0.40
$1.88 $1.95 80.07
Multi -family units are serviced witha combination of residential and commercial services,
14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 90247 • (310) 329-4115
Page 2
Letter to Mr. Burrell
depending on space and esthetic considerations. If a multi -unit dwelling is serviced using
barrel service, the SFD rate applies per unit. Should bin service apply, the rates are as
listed on the attached schedule. Share lot rates will also go up corresponding to the
4.18% increase. Those rates are attached as well.
Thanks again. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
•
Chip Scholz
Director of Community Affairs
cc: Mike Koep
James Devlin
Scott Bergman
Waste
Systems -
BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES
Los Angeles District
F=R.O NT< E N I
..........................
...............................
...................................
YARDS
Recycled paper
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Schedule of Rates for Trash Removal Service
Commercial, Professional, Industrial Firms,
and Apartment Complexes
July, 1992 (current rates)
1 /WK 2/WK 3/WK 4/WK 5/WK 6/WK 7/WK
1 YD
44.79
67.24
89.65
112.08
134.31
156.87
183.55
1.5 YD
49.80
74.69
99.57
124.81
149.42
199.99
233.98
2 YD
59.79
92.19
124.53
156.87
184.31
211.72
247.70
3 YD
69.69
107.06
144.46
181.80
219.11
256.45
300.06
4 YD
83.62
128.50
193.99
218.45
262.98
307.80
360.12
6 YD
104.56
160.62
216.71
272.72
328.72
384.73
450.15
ROLL- O RATE:
36.56 Delivery Fee
156.65 per load plus disposal fee
14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247 • (310)329-4115
Waste
Systems
BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES
Los Angeles District
FROG
..............
................
YARDS
Recycled paper
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Schedule of Rates for Trash Removal Service
Commercial, Professional, Industrial Firms,
and Apartment Complexes
Proposed Rates to be Effective January 1994
1 /WK 2/WK 3/WK 4/WK 5/WK 6/WK 7/WK
1 YD
46.66
70.05
93.39
116.77
139.92
163.43
191.23
1.5 YD
51.88
77.81
103.73
130.02
155.66
208.35
243.76
2 YD
62.29
96.04
129.74
163.43
192.02
220.57
258.05
3 YD
72.60
111.54
150.50
189.40
228.27
267.17
312.60
4 YD
87.12
133.87
202.09
227.58
273.97
320.66
375.17
6 YD
108.93
167.33
225.77
284.12
342.46
400.81
468.96
ROLL -OFF RATE
38.09 Delivery Fee
163.20 per load plus disposal fee
14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247 • (310)329-4115
•
PRICE INIDE7CES
PACIFIC CITIES AND U. S. CITY AVIKIRAGE
ALL. ITEMS INEE}�4
(1982-84=100 unless otherwise noted)
MAY 1992
ALL URBAN CONSUMERS
PERCENT CHANGE
Year 1 Month
INDEXES ending ending
MONTHLY DATA MAY. APR. MAY APR. MAY MAY
1991 1992 1992 1992 1992 1992
0. S. City Average 135.6 139.5 139.7 3.0 0.1
(1967=100)' 406.3 417.9 418.6 - Los Angeles -Anaheim -RiversideAngeles -Anaheim -Riverside140.8 145.8 146.0 3.7 0.- 1
(1967=100) 416.1 430.9 431.5 - -
San Francisco -Oakland -San Jose136.2 141.6 141.9
(1967=100) 418.8 435.4 436.3
West 136.3 141.3 141.4
(Dec. 1977 = 100) 220.3 228.4 228.6
West - A 138.1 143.2 143.5
(Dec. 1977 = 100) - 225.2 233.5 234.1
West - C 132.6 138.7 137.9
(Dec. 1977 = 100) 205.7 215.1 214.0
3.2
3.6
4.3
4.2 0.2
3.7 3.7 0.1
3.9 3.- 9 0.- 2
4.1 4.0 -0.6
URBAN WAGE EARNERS AND CLERICAL WORKERS
PERCENT CHANGE
Year 1 Month
INDEXES ending ending
MAY APR. MAY APR. MAY MAY
1991 1992 1992 1992 1992 1992
133.8 137.3 137.6 3.0 ' 2.8 0.2
398.5 408.9 409.9 - - -
136.5 141.3 141.4 3.7 3.6 0.1
403.4 417.4 418.0 - - -
134.8 139.6 140.1 4.0 3.9 0.4
410.5 425.2 426.5 - - -
134.3 139.0 139.2
216.1 223.6 223.9
134.6 139.3 139.7
217.8 225.5 226.1
131.6 137.1 136.5
203.0 211.5 210.5
3.7 3.6 0.1
3.8 3.8 0.3
3.7 3.- 7 -0.- 4
Size classes: A = 1,250,000 and over, B = Not available for West, C = 50,000 to 330,000, D = Not available for West.
Release date June 12 1992. For more information call (415) 744-6600 or (213) 252-7521. CPI 24 hour hotline numbers for
the pacific cities are as follows:
Anchorage (907) 271-2770 Los Angeles (213) 252-7528 San Diego (619) 557-6538 Seattle (206) 553-0645
Honolulu (808) 541-2808 Portland (503) 326-4132 San Francisco (415) 744-6605
**********************'r '*********************.***** �Y**********************
CONSUMER PRICE INDEXES . .
PACIFIC CITIJS AND U.S. CITY AVERAGE
BALL ITEMS INDEXES
(1982-84.100 unless otherwise noted)
DECEMBER 1993
MONTHLY DATA
ALL URBAN CONSUMERS
PERCENT CHANGE
Year 1 Month
INDEXES ending . ending
DEC. NOV. DEC. NOV. DEC. DEC.
r '1992 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993
U. 8. City Average 141.9 145.8 145.8 '2.7 2.7 0.0
(1967.100) 425.2 436.9 436.8 -
Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside.148.2. 151.6 151.9 ' 2.3 2.5 0.2
(1967.100) 437.7_ 447.8 448.9 - - -
San Prancieco-Oakland-San Jose144.3 147.2 147.0 2.1 1.9 -0.1
(1967.100) 443.7 452.5 451.9
West 143.9 147.5 147.8 2.5 2.7 0.2
(Dec. 1977 . 100) 232.6 '238.5 238.9
' 145.8: 149.3 149.5 2.5 2.5 . 0.1,
(Dec. 1977 . 100) . 237.7 243.4 243.8 - - -
Nest - C 142.1 147.0 146.7 3.4 3.2 -0.2
(Deo. 1977 . 100) 220.4 228.0 227.6 - -
West - A
UW3AN WAG' EARNERS AND CLERICAL WORKERS
PERCENT CHANGE
Year 1 Month
INDEXES " ' ending ending
DEC. NOV. DEC. NOV. DEC. NOV.
1992 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993
139.8 143.4 143.3 ' 2.6 2.5 -0.1
416.3 427.1 426.8 - ' -
143.5 146.4 146.7 2.0 2.2 0.2
424.1 432.5 433.5
142.3 145.0 144.7 1.9 1.7 -0.2
433.5 441.4 .440.7 -
141.5 144.8 145.0 ' 2.3 2.5 0.1
227.7 233.0 233.3 -
141.8 ' 145.0 145.2 . 2.3' 2.4 0.1
229.6 234.7 235.0.
140.2 144.7 144.5 ' 3.1 3.1 -0.1
216.2 223.2 222.9 '
Size claeeeae A . 1,250,000 and over, B . Not available for West, C - 50,000 to 330,000, D . Not available for West.
Release date January 13, 1994. Por more information call (415) 744-6600 or (213) 252=7521. CPI 24 hour hotline numbers
for the pacific cities are as follows:
Ltd Angeles ?t(213) 252775281; San Diego (619) 557-6538 Seattle. (206) 553-0645.
Pbrtland (503) 231=2045i? San Francisco (43(5•) 744-6605
Anchbtige +(907)1771.27701
Honolulu' x(808)1541.2808 t
March 14, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
SOUTH SCHOOL PARK
CIP 92-515
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Award the contract for the South School Park landscape
architectural services to J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. in
the amount of $19,843.
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest
the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney.
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes
to the contract as necessary within the budget.
4. Approve Resolution No. 94- , a Resolution of the Hermosa
Beach City Council approving the application for grant funds
for the Urban Tree Planting. Competitive Grant Program for
the South School Park Project.
Background:
At the City Council meeting of January 25, 1994 the City Council
approved the allocation of $20,000 from the South School Park
Project, CIP 92-515, to pay for landscape architectural
consultant services.
Analysis:
On January 31, 1994 the Public Works Department sent out notices
inviting proposals and on March 3, 1994 seven proposals were
received and opened. All seven firms which submitted packages
showed impressive qualifications and met or exceeded the
requirements as set forth in the requested scope of work. A
committee including representatives from the Public Works
Department, Community Resources Department and the Parks and
Recreation Commission was formed to analyze the proposals.
Interviews were held on March 9, 1994 to determine which of the
seven landscape architects best suited the needs of the City.
After much deliberation the committee has chosen J. F. Davidson
Associates, Inc. of Riverside. Their in-house civil and traffic
engineering expertise, landscape design concepts, previous
experience with the City (Edith Rodaway Park), and recognition of
the extent to which the Parks and Recreation Commission's
conceptual plan had been developed set Davidson apart from the
other firms. References revealed J. F. Davidson to be efficient
and thoughtful designers. The Public Works Department therefore
recommends J. F. Davidson be awarded the contract for landscape
architectural services for the South School Project in the amount
of $19,843.
The Urban Tree Planting Competitive Grant Program was established
by the Enactment of Section 8.a.3.c of Los Angeles County
Proposition A which voters approved on November 3, 1992. This
section of the Proposition has provided $5 Million to be awarded
on a competitive basis for the purpose of planting trees in
public places as urban beautification projects.
As funding for the South School Project falls some $350,000 short
of the estimated amount necessary to construct Phase II of the
Park several funding sources were investigated. Application has
already been made for a California Department of Forestry Grant.
(No resolution was required for the CDF Grant.) It is estimated
that an award of approximately $150,000, to be put towards the
planting of trees and installation of irrigation systems to
sustain these trees, may be available for South School Park
through the Urban Tree Planting Competitive Grant Program.
Applications for this grant must include a resolution from the
City Council approving the application for grant funds. These
applications are due May 2, 1994.
Fiscal Impact:
The projected cost to design the South School Park Project
(including an allocation to account for unforeseeable costs) is:
Design contract amount: $19,843
Contingencies - 15% of contract: 2,977
Total $22,820
•
The amount funded for the South School Project (CIP 92-515) is
$319,729. The balance after approval of the design contract will
be $296,909.
Attachment
Respectfully submitted:
Joseph C. Mankawich
Capital Improvement Project
Engineer
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
pworks/CCSOPARK
Concur:
C�mu) coArv-maiy,_
Amy Amirani
Director of Public Works
ooney
unity Resources Director
StepM-. Turrell
City anager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT URBAN TREE
PLANTING COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE SOUTH SCHOOL PARK
PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November
3, 1992, enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe
Neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree -Planting, Senior and
Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection (the
Proposition), which, among other uses, provides funds to public
agencies and nonprofit organizations in the County for the
purpose of planting trees as urban beautification projects; and
WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County
Regional Park and Open Space District (the District) to
administer said funds; and
WHEREAS, the District has set forth the necessary procedures
governing applications for grant funds under the Proposition; and
WHEREAS, Section 8.a.3.0 has allocated funds for the purpose
of planting trees in public places as urban beautification
projects; and
WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the "Applicant" to
certify, by resolution, the approval of the application before
submission of said application to the District; and
WHEREAS, "any Applicant" selected for a grant award will be
required to enter into an Agreement with the District for the
performance of the project as described in the application; and
WHEREAS, said. Agreement will . contain assurances that
"Applicant" must comply with, including an assurance to provide
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
any additional funds that may be required to complete the project
if the grant funds required are insufficient and an assurance to
maintain the property in perpetuity;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA:
1. Approves the filing of an application with the Los Angeles
County Regional Park and Open Space District for funds
allocated under Section 8.a.3.0 of the Proposition for the
above-named Project; and
2. Certifies that the City of Hermosa Beach will be required to
provide additional funding for the above-named Project if the
requested grant funds are insufficient to complete said
Project; and
3. Certifies that the City of Hermosa Beach has, or will have,
sufficient funds to operate and maintain the property in
perpetuity; and
3. Appoint the Director of Public Works, as agent of the City of
Hermosa Beach to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit
all documents, including, but not limited to applications,
agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may
be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned
project.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of March, 1994.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
4f."
CITY CLERK
pworks/urbntree
- 2 -
March 14, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
BILTMORE PARK MASTER PLAN
Recommendation
It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission that
Council forward the attached conceptual suggestions (Attachment A) and items of concern
(listed in the analysis below) for the Biltmore Park site to the architect.
Background
By a vote of the people, the .9 acre Biltmore site is designated as a City park. The ballot
referendum provided specific standards for the park (Attachment B).
At the January 25, 1994 meeting, City Council authorized Public Works staff to secure
architectural services to design the Biltmore Park and requested that the Commission
concurrently devise a conceptual plan for the site. An RFP was distributed for park design
and bid has been awarded to Lawrence Moss and Associates ($6,000).
The Commission held a hearing at their February 17, 1994 (Attachment B) meeting and
voted to recommend the following:
Analysis
• No hardscape pathways (decomposed granite or other natural surface).
• Ground plane landscape shall consist of turf, groundcovers and flowers. Shrubbery
should be avoided or minimized
• Trees should be mature shade trees (potential for a very large tree in the center of the
park should be explored).
• Tall landscape elements should be included near the buildings on 15th Street.
• Security issues such as lighting and visibility should be addressed.
• Sense of entry should be from the Strand .
• No tot lot.
• No dogs allowed.
• Keep walkways to a maximum of 10 feet wide.
The conceptual plan and items of concern from the Commission will serve as a basic
framework for the Biltmore Park Master Plan that will be completed by Lawrence Moss
and Associates. The Commission's concept is not recommended as a specific design;
1
1 0
i
rather as a starting point for the work program that will be completed by the architect.
City Council will review and approve the architect's plans at a future meeting to complete
the design process for the park.
Fiscal Impact: None.
Note: Council approved a budget of $6,000 for architectural services for the Biltmore
Park at the January 25, 1994 meeting.
Other alternatives available to the Council include:
1. Modify the Commission's conceptual suggestions.
2. Select an alternative conceptual plan (Attachment B).
3. Request additional information.
Attachments:
A: Recommended conceptual plan from the Commission.
B: February 17, Commission agenda item which includes:
• January 25, 1994 Council Meeting agenda item.
• Ballot measure.
• Minutes from February 17, 1994 Commission Meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ma ooney
Co
munity Resources Director
Concur:
(Nit-
Olm (
Amy Amarani
Public Works Director
Steurrell
City .Manager
2
February 3, 1994
Chairperson and Members of the
Parks, Recreation and Community
Resources Advisory Commission
Regular Meeting of
February 17, 1994
BILTMORE PARK MASTER PLAN
Recommendation
It is recommended by staff that the Commission review the attached report
and designs prepared for the Biltmore Park site and :
• listen to public testimony about the proposed designs and;
• recommend a conceptual plan for the site accounting for the items listed in
the analysis below.
Background
By a vote of the people, the .9 acre Biltmore site is designated as a City park.
The ballot referendum provided specific standards by which the park should
be designed (Attachment D).
At the January 20, 1994 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, staff was
directed to forward a memorandum from the Commission to the Council
recommending that the design be subject to a public hearing and Commission
review (Attachment A). Council approved this request at their January 25,
1994 meeting (see Minutes- Attachment B).
Commissioners are encouraged to "walk the site" prior to the meeting.
Analysis
The Public Works Department has drafted two (2) potential designs labeled I
and II. Staff has some concerns with the recommended design (II) due to the
suggested tot lot and its compatibility with the ballot measure.
In order to frame the Commission discussion, staff suggests the following be
considered:
1. Ballot measure requirements
2. Traffic flow (15th Street & 15th Court)
3. Budget constraints (i.e., phasing)
4. Planting materials
5. Maintenance costs (estimated annual impact on the general fund)
6. Security Issues (lighting, uses, design)
7. Timeline
8. Aesthetics (downtown plan)
9. Infrastructure requirements
Attachments:
Attachment A: Memo to Council from Commission
Attachment B: Minutes: January 25, 1994 Council meeting
Attachment C: January 25, 1994 Council agenda item (Biltmore Park
Alternatives)
Attachment D: Ballot Measure
Respectfully Submitted,
Mary ' . " :. ey, Director
Co unity Resources Dept./
Assistant City Manager
•
ATTACHMENT "A"
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the Council
Date: January 25, 1994 Council Meeting
From: Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission
Re: Biltmore Park
Per previous Council direction, the Parks Recreation and Community
Resources Commission has not been formally included as part of the review
process for this conceptual park plan. Recognizing Council's sentiments to
proceed as quickly as possible with park construction, the Commission still
feels that public input and Commission review is a vital link in formalizing the
ultimate park plan.
We stand ready, willing and able to review these designs and take public
input at the Commission level and encourage you to schedule a public hearing
on the issue at a Council meeting. Parks endure for generations. Careful
planning and community involvement at the beginning will serve the City well
in the long run.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Steven A. Crecy
Chairperson
•
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION i
ATTACHMENT "15 -
the
13"
the money is accumulated by accrual of $4 per
overhead fed meter per year; there would be no
interest charged to the City for the advance of
funds; the PUC directed that districts be
formed with a priority for areas of heavy traf-
fic, scenic beauty, or pedestrian access; the
only extracost to the City would be for the
formation of the district; and the cost to the
property owner was determined from an under-
ground project in Redondo Beach a year ago.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) direct staff to proceed with the preparation of
necessary documents to create an Underground Dis-
trict for the recommended project:
a) Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Pacific
Coast Highway at a cost of $345,200;
b) Pacific Coast Highway, from Artesia Boulevard
to Aviation at a cost of $518,800; and,
c) Beach Drive, from Herondo Avenue to 24th Street
at a cost of $1,136,000,
for a total cost of $2,000,000, to be provided by
Southern California Edison, under California Public
Utility Commission Rule 20A, through a yearly
deposit to Hermosa Beach of $131,574 (Hermosa Beach
may borrow against its account up to $2,000,000);
with a two year completion date for the project;
and, at a cost to affected property owners of from
$500 to $1,200, payable to the district or by a
lien on the property; and,
2) approve an appropriation of $10,000 from prospec-
tive expenditures to CIP 93-145 for consultant ser-
vices in order to prepare the necessary documents
to create the three Underground Utility Districts.
Also, with the understanding that staff will report back
with information on other mechanisms for area assess-
ment, in order to see if it is possible to create more
undergrounding districts.
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried
unanimously.
7. BILTMORE PARR ALTERNATIVES CIP 92-523: TO APPROVE CON-
CEPTUAL PLAN, APPROVE APPROPRIATION OF $6,000 FROM BILT-
MORE PARK PROJECT TO OBTAIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SER-
VICES, AND APPROVE EXPENDITURE OF APPROXIMATELY $60,000
FROM THE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 92-408)
FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THAT PORTION OF SEWER
WHICH EXTENDS THROUGH THE PARK SITE. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 18,
1994. Supplemental memorandum from Steven A. Crecy,
Chairperson, Parks, Recreation and Community Resources
Advisory. Commission dated January 25, 1994. Supplemen-
tal Action Plan submitted by Public' Works Director Amy
Amirani dated January 25, 1994.
City Council Minutes 01-25-94 Page 8413
ATTACHMENT "B"
Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Pete Tucker - 235 34th Street, said he was amazed
that $60,000would be spent for a park sewer
when there were areas of the City that are so
much more in need; asked that the sewer problem
be reassessed (he was told that this portion of
the sewer was in the original project, recently
completed, but had been deferred due to the
possibility of a hotel on the property that
could have been required to pay for the sewer);
Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, showed his
design; spoke of the paths being other than
concrete, as that was hardscape and the Or-
dinance allowed only 100 percent softscape;
and,
Steve Crecy - Parks, Recreation and Community
Resources Advisory Commission Chairperson, said
more public input was needed for this project
and the. Commission was ready and able to hold
the needed public hearings for the park.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) approve an appropriation of $6,000 from the Bilt-
more Park Project, CIP 92-523, to obtain landscape
architectural services to provide working drawings
for the park development; and,
2) approve an expenditure of approximately $60,000
from the Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project, CIP
92-408, for the design and construction of that
portion of the sewer which extends through the Park
site.
And, send the project to the Parks, Recreation and Com-
munity Resources Advisory Commission with the direction.
for specific design phases contingent upon financing
options, with the item to come back to Council within
three months.
Motion Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried
unanimously.
8. SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CIP 92-501: DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO OBTAIN ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO
DESIGN SOUTH SCHOOL PARK AND ALLOCATE $20,000 FROM SOUTH
SCHOOL PARK PROJECT TO PAY FOR ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT
SERVICES. Memorandum from Public Works director Amy
Amirani dated January 18, 1994. Supplemental memorandum
from Steven A Crecy, Chairperson, Parks, Recreation and
Community Resources Advisory Commission dated January
25, 1994.
Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions. Assistant City Man-
ager Mary Rooney also responded to Council questions.
City Council Minutes 01-25-94 Page 8414
ATTACHMENT "
January 18, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994
BILTMORE PARR ALTERNATIVES
CIP 92-523
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Approve the suggested conceptual plan for the Biltmore Park
site.
2. Approve an appropriation of $6,000 from the Biltmore Park
Project, CIP 92-523, to obtain landscape architectural
services to provide working drawings for the park
development.
3. Approve an expenditure of approximately $60,000 from the
Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project, CIP 92-408, for the
design and construction of that portion of sewer which
extends through the Park site.
Background:
At the City Council meeting of September 14, 1993, a
recommendation to examine alternatives for construction of
Biltmore Park was approved by the City Council. City Council at
the September 28, 1993 meeting made the following
recommendations:
1. Remove the parking lot located between 15th Street and
15th Court.
2. Remove Beach Drive between 14th Street and 15th Street.
3. Remove the westerly 60' of 15th Court.
4. Do not construct a cul-de-sac at the new terminus of
15.Eh Court.
5. Provide additional alternatives to the proposed design
concepts.
Acting upon these recommendations staff prepared a demolition and
grading plan for the Biltmore site. Upon City Council approval
of these plans the City entered into a contract with J&G
Industries to perform the defined demolition. The demolition
contract was successfully completed on January 6, 1994 and the
site was prepared for the next phase of construction.
Analysis:
The next steps in the development of the Biltmore Park site are:
1. The undergrounding of existing Southern California Edison
and General Telephone lines.
2. The upgrading of existing infrastructures.
3. Preparation of Park improvement plans.
4. Construction of the Park improvements.
Undergrounding: Southern California Edison has initiated
preparation of the plans for the undergrounding of their
utilities. General Telephone has been in contact with
Southern California Edison and typically joins forces with
Edison in these undergrounding projects. Plans for the
undergrounding of both utilities are due to be completed by
the end of January. Construction is scheduled to begin in
early March and should be complete by the end of that month.
The costs of this construction will be negotiated with the
affected agencies.
Infrastructures: California Water Service Company has
completed removal of valves that had serviced the old hotel.
The water main is not scheduled for replacement. Southern
California Gas Company is preparing plans for the removal
and replacement of the existing 6" main which was installed
in 1923. Plans are expected to be complete by the end of
January, 1994. Construction of this new line is expected to
be completed by the beginning of March. The City sewer main
that runs along the centerline of Beach Drive from 14th
Street to 16th Court is due for replacement. The Public
Works Department has begun preparation of plans for this
project and expect these plans to be complete by the second
week in February, 1994. The estimated cost for the
replacement of 420 L.F. of 10" sewer main is $60,000.00.
Park Concept Plans: Attached please find the two preferred
alternatives for the Biltmore Park site. Alternative 1
represents the originally submitted design concept modified
to recognize the City Council's September 28, 1993
recommendations. This plan basically creates colored
concrete path extensions to Beach Drive and 15th Court which
divide the site into four landscaped areas. These
landscaped areas will be dotted with mounded planting areas
with meandering grass paths in between. Colored concrete
seat and planter walls would complete the improvements.
Alternative 2 represents a concept which has gathered input
from the Public Works Maintenance Department and Police
Department as well as from citizen and business persons.
This plan attempts to create an "active" park in an effort
to prevent the loitering and vagrancy associated with
"passive" type parks. The activity of the park is designed
to center around a gathering area. Meandering paths will
traverse the Park diagonally and will join at the gathering
area. Four grassy knolls for viewing of the gathering
center and the ocean front will be provided. Security
lighting will be included at the request of the Police
Department. Plantings would be limited to the installation
of approximately ten shade trees with flower beds beneath
these trees, giving the Park an open and friendly feeling.
The southeast corner of the site proposes a tot lot with a
nautical theme - perhaps a scaled down version of the
sunken -ship Manhattan Beach has in their Polliwog Park.
Staff believes that Alternative 2 represents the best
combination of utility, safety and ease of maintenance. The
cost to provide working drawings for either alternative will
be in the neighborhood of $6,000. It will take
approximately one month to complete these plans once
approval of the conceptual plan is granted.
Fiscal Impact:
The hiring of a consultant to provide working drawings for the
construction of Biltmore Park will require $6,000 of the $21,000
remaining in the Biltmore Park Project, CIP 92-501.
The cost to design and construct the replacement of the 10" sewer
main which runs through the Park is estimated to cost $60,000 of
the $2,400,000 in the Sewer Project, CIP 92-408.
Attachments
Respectfully submitted,
VLLL4 Ca-+\
Amy Amir ni
Director of Public Works
Review for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
pworks/BILTPRK
•
Concur:
Mary Roeney
Di ector of Community
Resources
Stephen xf-rell
City Manager
ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE
Biltmore Park Project
ALTERNATIVE I
Mobilization
Irrigation
Landscaping
Sidewalk at 14th and 15th St.
C&Gat 14th and 15th St.
Sidewalk
Benches
Lighting -
Subtotal
Contingencies at 10%
TOTAL
ALTERNATIVE II
Mobilization
Soil Preparation
Irrigation
Landscaping
Sidewalk at 14th and 15th St.
C&G at 14th and 15th St.
Sidewalks
Benches
Tot Lot
Lighting
Subtotal
Contingencies at 10%
1
29,414
29,414
330
60
3200
50
1
1
320
29,414
29,414
330
60
4,800
60
1
1
L.S.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
L.F.
S.F.
L.F.
L.S.
L.S.
C.Y.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
L.F.
S.F.
L.F.
L.S.
L.S.
$ 3,200.00 $ 3,200
$ .55 $16,178
$ .55 $16,178
$ 4.00 $ 1,320
$ 15.00 $ 900
$ 5.00 $16,000
$ 60.00 $ 3,000
$ 20,000 $20,000
$76,776
$ 7,678
$84,453
$ 3,200.00 $ 3,200
$ 15.00 $ 4,800
$ .55 $16,178
$ .65 $19,119
$ 4.00 $ 1,320
$ 15.00 $ 900
$ 5.00 $24,000
$ 60.00 $ 3,600
$15,000.00 $15,000
$20,000.00 $20,000
$108,117
$ 10,812
TOTAL $118,929
0
..•
••
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ACTION PLAN
JANUARY 25, 1994
BILTMORE PARK
FUNDING: PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES TAX FUND $ 38,000
PHASE I - DEMOLITION EXPENDITURE $ 17,000
PHASE II - SEWER FUND $ 60,000
PHASE IIT- HAR.hSCAPE, IRRIGATION, LIGHTING
LA COUNTY TREE PLANTING GRANT $ 42,117*
LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND $ 20,000
REMAINING FUND BALANCE FROM
PHASE I $ 21,000
PHASE IV TREES AND FLOWERS
CDF GRANT
Potential Funding
ACTION ITEMS:
Item Task
Phase I - Demolition
1 • Design / first phase - Demolition
2. Prepare Bid Package
3. Advertising - first
4. Advertising - second
5. Bid opening/review bids
6. City Council approval of bids and award of contract
7. Completed Demolition
Phase II - Infrastructure Improvements
1 • Design
2. Prepare Bid Package
3. Advertising- first
4. Advertising - second
5. Bid opening/review bids
6. City Council approval of bids and award of contract
7. Construction
8. Complete construction and acceptance of project
$ 25,000*
Scheduled
Completion
Date
10/21/93
10/27/93
10/27/93
11/3/93
11/18/93
12/14/93
1/6/94
2/16/94
2/29/94
3/3/94
3/17/94
3/31/94
4/12/94
6/12/94
Phase III - Pathways, grass, irrigation and lighting improvements
1. Prepare Request For Proposals 2/7/94
2. Consultant to prepare Proposals 2/24/94
3. Evaluate Proposals and hire a consultant 2/25/94
4. Design 4/4/94
5. Prepare Bid Package 4/7/94
6. Advertising - first 4/7/94
7. Advertising - second 4/21/94
8. Bid opening/review bids 5/17/94
9. City Council approval of bids and award of contract 5/24/94
10. Construction 6/30/94
Phase IV - Trees and Flowers Planting
1. Prepare Request For Proposals 2/7/94
2. Consultant to prepare Proposals 2/24/94
3. Evaluate Proposals and hire a consultant 2/25/94
4. Design 4/4/94
5. Prepare Bid Package 4/7/94
6. Advertising - first **
7. Advertising - second
8. Bid opening/review bids
9. City Council approval of bids and award of contract
10. Construction
Phase V - Tot Lot Improvements
1. Prepare Request For Proposals 2/7/94
2. Consultant to prepare Proposals 2/24/94
3. Evaluate Proposals and hire a consultant 2/25/94
4. Design 4/4/94
5. Prepare Bid Package 4/7/94
6. Advertising - first **
7. Advertising - second
8. Bid opening/review bids
9. City Council approval of bids and award of contract
10. Construction
** When funding becomes available
aa/biltmore.sch
1-1-52 m bM &4 145
PEG. Pi, 99.Y
ATTACFIMENT• "D"
Q
AND VOTER INFORMATION
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1992
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK
5557 FERGUSON DRIVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90022.5192
(213) 727.1900 or (213) 721.1100
THE LOCATION OF YOUR
POLLING PLACE
AND ABSENT VOTER APPLICATION
ARE ON THE BACK COVER
POLLS OPEN FROM 7 A.M. TO 8 P.M.
PLEASE DO NOT
TAKEOITTHIS SAMPLE BALLOT AWAY
MARK AND �TO YOUR POLLING P ACE
:dil��iTir�u•
3,5
J^
.,� �.t1 �::,.r .L.s4V�il.,-y :i.'x'ti�,r:F•'!F:.•sr�,,,li:C
J { r
'Fi▪ ��T� -rte: y�: -t •.. c=S%
5#; z0s:wh;yh;'fb1'r`
4 e,'
sti
�-.,-•!.:cama...ryi�f"`t»:i` `�,S't fy ifT)�. +(>f,'�
• '�jT•''7;2�,it%ea
'`i� =`};=c•.:^_;;st���:.�
•
r h4.•
,r:,.�r..>�;aF. 4•fir
r
4;-: rte p '� ,:t`,.� '1
r1}1n1: .J.k.. •^?r.• ,
;.�43ily'4tr51 .:4'7'is.,-,--- ..-
.
: ".r. '�-'.1.'r t.e . •-, '4r "4 �'�'4l1-'tr �a['.�Ix•;n A:ix*;t t: ;y.:$,
,
..�,.+. :•
1•/.,1 ey:" / •�,.b � ,�,..,,,..4t...,„ir �,1\ II � �r�, �i
'% �f .• ` .r.-. 'kJ,•' f...`i _ q.:a fes.. _ .
+i..,--.....:.::.-„:..1.1 ,1; . '▪ )SP,aL.-.��.1 S: ''
' r. •4'.'• j.rjt-9�Z:7)5T
;'-� h? ;_. :. - - •.. ice'• -s t t . 5 sv:. -; •-/:• S j
- sem' - te iv•'rx?.'G'"r.°%` ~;£ "iti�c�.�r.•
.• Sille
♦y
•
•
,T -.r.1. r
i;:. t .}✓, =it x% Z;, �•
y': k.';►fit.~ .1
i1
c y .1- x I. e ,.1`N•.
STATE MEASURES
167
STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Increases taxes on top 158
personal income taxpayers• corporations, banks, insurance 159
companies, and oil producers. Repeals 1991 sales tax increases.
Provides for renters' tax credits. Changes business -owned real property
reappraisal rule. Fiscal Impact: Net state gains of S560 million to 5910 million annually from 1993-94
through. 1995-96: thereafter, approximately an additional S1 billion annually. Net increase in revenues to
local governments of $550 million to S1.2 billion beginning 1993-94.
YES4O
N040
COUNTY MEASURES
PARK. RECREATION AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS; 166 YES -+O
A
ASSESSMENTS. For the purpose of improving the safety of recreation
areas, preventing gangs, planting trees, and acquiring, restoring and 167 NO $ O
preserving beach, park, wildlife, and open space resources, shall the Los Angeles
County Regional Park and Open Space District be established and shall assessments be levied to fund the
purposes of the District and to benefit property throughout the District, in accordance with the order of the
Board of Supervisors?
ESTABLISHMENT OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE. To promote efficiency 170 YES -+O
B
the Charter is amended to separate the legislative and executrve powers
now given to the Board of Supervisors. An elected County Executive is 171 No -00
established who will prepare the budget, veto ordinances, and appoint County
department heads and commissioners. The Board of Supervisors will continue as the legislative body with
authority to confirm the County Executive's appointments, adopt ordinances, and override vetoes. The
addition of the County Executive shall not increase County costs.
CINCREASE IN NUMBER OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS. Increases the
membership of the Board of Supervisors from five to ning, and establishes
supervisorial district boundaries.
174
YES'► O
175 NO.40
HERMOSA BEACH CITY SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
REZONING THE BILTMORE SITE AS OPEN SPACE/PUBLIC PARK. 179
D •
Shall the Petition Initiative Ordinance which designates the Biltmore Site as
Open Space 0-S-2 for preservation and use as a public park be adopted? 180
YES -0
NO 40
07-003E
LA -145-8
1!�
TITLE AND SUMMARY — PETITION INITIATIVE
ORDINANCE — PROPOSITION D
INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE
VOTERS
The City Attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief
purpose and points of the proposed measure:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
CREATING AND DESIGNATING THE "BILTMORE SITE" AS OPEN
SPACE O -S-2, TO ENSURE ITS PRESERVATION AND USE AS A PUB-
LIC PARK
This proposed initiative ordinance would repeal Ordinance No. 91-1062
(which was approved by the voters of the City of Hermosa Beach on November
5, 1991), modify both the Land Use Element of the Hermosa Beach General
Plan and the official zoning map, and redesignate the property commonly
known as the "Biltmore Site" as O -S-2 Open Space Two under the Land Use
Element of the General Plan and rezone the Biltmore Site as "Open Space
0-S-2."
An "Open Space O -S-2" zoning classification as defined by this measure
would restrict the use of the Biltmore Site to a public park and would only
permit improvements relating to the park's beautification. No buildings or
structures of any kind, permanent or temporary, would be allowed under Open
Space O -S-2. The measure provides that softscape non -building improve-
, such as grass, trees, plants, flowers, unobtrusive park lighting and some
es to view the ocean, shall be artistically designed and cover all of the
Biltmore Site. The use and improvements to the park are intended to ensure
a natural, safe and peaceful environment and enhance the quality of life in Her-
mosa Beach.
Funding for improvements and maintenance of the park shall come from park
and recreation monies. Additional funding may come from private donations,
volunteer help, and fundraisers.
An additional mandate is that the Biltmore Site shall not be sold, leased, nor
consolidated with other land, without the vote of the people.
The measure provides that the City shall seek necessary approvals from the
California Coastal Commission for the amendments made by this initiative
and take all actions necessary to implement the terms and intent of this
measure.
It
If any part of this measure is invalidated, the rest will remain in full force and
effect. Any ordinance which is adopted concurrently with this initiative, which
receives less votes and is in conflict with the provisions herein, shall be
repealed and have no force or effect.
This measure shall only take effect if it receives a majority vote of the people,
and once adopted, can only be amended or repealed by a vote of the people.
PR -006.001 LA -145-37
- ,yr'AC� ��.. t:f...:`Y4••.. •,.-fir -� 'F•.. yj`:y',�
_• • c •
' 1. a .•.':�.i/ ...t Tim. ,ems -Zi.-sem•
•
•SX
• -';-1 ::r .,e ..i. �.J'. 11 N.ti.. �" r. tom: :;'''a1.,
-:/.`'1.. Y.'*.: .o fi., �'� ii•'l r. ram` - a ^iv y� Ty. r ' +J: X,� ,rJ
•. `.,• `_•'' a' t•o- b��'�:; h'J�r' =i �. ?v w•a• .y,.� �• �:-F• �: I':a C'.J. nS !( � �""'�
'%<}::, ••F�n. �� ,i .:�.w Via..{ ..,. . -,,.fu ...'j� '•T.-' .C:�
'}��`",'' '��S�Z� k 7.�_ �r�,��Y,�i` �2.�.,4a�••�3' 3y.:,.";�Y�;.`9ct3Q r''ia!oi:di-,rn•''b�`�1��.k��"y"��_V;�k.�,�.
Ii..,ir•¢,�U`'�sS7i`r.Y}'�+t.r�it�h''•x;•.�,�leswS'`'Fi:r: �,'.4L •ai T•.�4�5]�k�fM>.tsnale���.
•
•et fY :"
r
PROPOSED ORDINANCE - PROPOSITION D
A PETITION INITIATIVE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AND DESIGNATING TILE "HILT -
MORE SITE" AS OPEN SPACE O -S-2; TO ENSURE ITS ('RESERVA-
TION ANI) USE AS A PUBLIC PARK.
WI-IEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the
City -owned Biltmore Site property shall be saved from commercial and resi-
dential development, because of existing problems of parking, density, conges-
tion, traffic, and air and noise pollution from traffic in the immediate arca and
elsewhere in Hermosa Beach.
WHEREAS, steps have to be taken to improve our quality of life, our environ-
ment, and to help save our earth. Therefore, the Biltmore Site shall be land-
scaped, and maintained as a 100% Open Space Oceanfront Strand Public Park
with grass, trees, and flowers for present and future generations to enjoy.
THE PEOPLE OF TIlE CITY OF IHERMOSA BEACH DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City -owned property commonly known as the Bilt-
more Site (hereinafter referred to as "Biltmore Site") shall be landscaped, and
maintained as a 100% Open Space O -S-2, Oceanfront Strand Public Park, with
grass, trees, and flowers for present and future generations to enjoy.
SECTION 2. That the Municipal Zoning Code of the City of Hermosa Beach
(the "Code") is hereby amended to add a new zone designated as O -S-2,
Restricted Open Space, as follows:
"Intent and Purpose.
The O -S-2 Zone is intended to restrict further the use of certain designated.
open space to assure permanent open space for public park purposes.
Permitted. Uses.
A Public Park — with landscaping, beautification, grass, trees, flowers,
plants and other uses if specifically authorized as a permitted improvement
herein.
Permitted Improvements.
Improvements in the 0-S-2 Zone shall be as follows:
(a) Only non -building public improvements relating to landscaping,
beautification — grass, trees, flowers, plants, soil, unobtrusive park
lighting, some benches to view the ocean, existing public utilities, one
flag pole for our American Flag, and erosion and irrigation improve-
ments to assure permanent open space for park purposes shall be per-
mitted.
(b) No buildings, malls, plazas, or structures -- temporary or permanent
in nature — shall be built, developed, constructed or erected on the
Biltmore Site.
45-33
(c) Softscapc shall include grass, trees, plants, soil, .flowers, and shall
artistically designed to cover all of the Biltmore Site.
(d) The use and improvements to the park arc to ensure a natural, pea(
ful, serene and safe environment to improve and enhance the qual;
of life in Hermosa Beach."
SECTION 3. Ordinance No. 91-1062 is hereby repealed and the Land U
Element of the Hermosa Beach General Plan and the official zoning map a
modified by reclassifying and rezoning certain property commonly known
the Biltmore Site.
SECTION 4. The Biltmore Site is hereby reclassified as O -S-2 Open Spa
Two under the land Use Element of the General Plan (hereinafter t'
"General Plan") and rezoned as O -S-2 Open Space Two. •
SECTION 5. For the purposes of this ordinance and the rezoning reclassi
.cation of the subject property, the Biltmore Site is defined as fbllows:
(a) The Biltmore Site consists of that certain property identified as Lo
#1 through 9, inclusive, Lots 19, 20, and 32 all in Block 15 of the He
mosa Beach Tract in the City off lermosa Beach, County of Los Ang
les, State of California, as per map recorded in Book I, pages 25, 2
of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said county, togeth(
with all of the vacated portion of Beach Drive and 15th Court adjacci
to the above noted lots.
SECTION 6. The City shall seek necessary approvals from the Californi
Coastal Commission for the amendments made by this ordinance and take a
further actions necessary to implement and enforce the terms and inten.t c
this ordinance.
SECTION 7. If any section or sub -section of this ordinance is for any reaso
held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect in any respect th
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or any such part thereo
SECTION 8. There shall be no modifications, amendment, or repeal of an
provision of this ordinance without a vote of the people.
SECTION 9. Any ordinance which is adopted concurrently with this ordi
•nance which receives less votes and is in conflict with any provisions herein
shall be repealed in its entirety and be of no force and effect. .
SECTION 10.
law.
SECTION 11.
vote of the pco
This ordinance shall take effect in the manner prescribed b:
This ordinance shall only take effect if it receives a majorit'.
plc.
SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
SECTION 13. Funding for the improvements, landscaping and maintenance
of the Park shall come from the following 'source:
(a) Parks and Recreation monies.
PR CrA
LA -145-3s
SECTION 14. Additional funding for the improvements, landscaping and
maintenance of the Park may come from the following sources:
(a)
(b)
Private donations — money, trees, flowers, soil, grass, etc.
Volunteers to help landscape the Biltmore Site by planting grass, flow-
ers and trees, ctc.
(c) Fundraisers and other sources should they become available. •
SECTION 15. The Biltmore Site is not to be sold, leased, nor consolidated
s;.
with other land, or lands, without a vote of the people.
fh
LA -1
CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF PROPOSITION D
This proposed initiative ordinance would repeal and modify both the Land
Use Element of the Hermosa Beach General Plan and the official zoning map,
and redesignate the property commonly known as the "Biltmorc Sitc" (0.82
acres) as O -S-2 Open Space Two under thc Land Use Element of thc General
Plan and rezone the Biltmore Sitc as "Open Space O -S-2."
An "Open Space O -S-2" zoning classification as defined by this measure
would restrict the use of the Biltmorc Sitc to a public park and would only
permit improvements relating to the park's beautification. No buildings or
structures of any kind, permanent or tcmporary, would be allowed under Open
Space 0-S-2..The measure provides that softscapc non -building improve-
ments, such as grass, trees, plants, flowers, unobtrusive park lighting and some
benches to view thc ocean, shall be artistically designed and cover all of the
Biltmorc Site. The use and improvements to the park arc intended to ensure
a natural, safe and peaceful environment and enhance the quality oflifein Her-
mosa Beach.
An additional mandate is that the Biltmorc Sitc shall not be sold, leased, nor
consolidated with othcr land, without the vote of the people. This measure is
inconsistent with recently approved land use designation by the Calilbrnia
Coastal Commission and the measure provides that the City shall seek neces-
sary approvals from thc California Coastal Commission for thc amendments
made by this initiative and take all actions necessary to implement the terms
and intent of this measure.
If any part of this measure is invalidated, the rest will remain in full force and
effect. This measure shall only take effect if it receives a majority vote of the
pcoplc. Once adopted, this measure can only be amended or repealed by a vote
of the people.
CHARLES S. VOSE
City Attorney
PA -006.005
LA -145.41
BILTMORE PARK MASTER PLAN
Parker Herriot
Stated Coastal permit has been approved. Elements in park may not change but design
may change. Permit reflects City ordinance. Read ordinance to Commission regarding the
site. Stated Peters Garden will donate plants and other shrubbery to be planted at site.
Stated that residents may wish to donate. Brought in rendering for park. Stated park must
be designed by a architect.
Harold Cohen - 957 - 2nd Street
Stated that the tot lot was a great idea. Believes that the park will promote business. Had
questions regarding grants that have been applied for. Questioned if dogs will be allowed.
Cautioned that dogs should be prohibited. Stated there is no need for a culdesac because
of the limited traffic on 15th Court.
Kevin Cody - 639 Longfellow
Expressed a strong recommendation that the park space be utilized to the best of its ability
as a tot lot. Provided the Commission with information about an architect Leathers. This
architect invites the public to become involved in the process of park development. Felt
the space could be under utilized. Provided Commission with information regarding the
architect (attached).
Note: Full packet is available at the Community Resources Department.
Motion: "Recommended approval of park concept submitted by Commissioner
Mitchell and that the program include:
-No tot lot.
-No dogs allowed.
-Keep walkways to a maximum of 10 feet wide.
-Plant taller landscape elements in front of 15th Street condos.
-No hardscape paths, all paths will be decomposed granite.
-Plant mature shade trees.
-Culdesac is a Public Works issue.
- Ground plane landscape should be primarily turf, groundcovers
and flowers. Shrubbery should be avoided or minimised.
- Security issues including lighting and visibility should be addressed."
Peirce/Koppel All Ayes
COMMISSIONER REQUESTED ITEMS
Koppel: Agendize: Restriction of dogs in all City parks. •
WILLIAM B. BARR
CHARLES 5. VOSE
CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER
JAMES GUFF MURPHY
EDWARD W. LEE
ROGER W. SPRINGER
BETH 5. BERGMAN
STEVEN B. OUINTANILLA
MARY L. MCMASTER
ARTHUR J. HAZARABEDIAN
LAW OFFICES
OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
THE PARK
281 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET. SECOND FLOOR
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012
12131 621-2000
MEMORANDUM
TO: ',onorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: harles S. Vose, City Attorney
DATE: March 16, 1994
TELECOPIER
1213) 621-2211
RE: Oil Project - .Reimbursement of City's Cost and
Attorney Fees
At the last City Council meeting a question was raised
concerning the right of the City of Hermosa to recover its
attorney fees and costs in defending any actions taken with
respect to the approval of the Oil Conditional Use Permit and
related matters. As the City Council is aware, the Resolution
(93-5632) approving the Conditional Use Permit for oil
development at the City maintenance yard included a provision
which required the oil operator to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the City from any action to set aside, void or annul
the permit approval. Specifically, the condition of approval
states as follows:
" The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and
attorney fees which the City may be required to pay as a
result of any claim or action brought against the City
because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real
party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense
of the action, but such participation shall not relieve
the permittee of any obligation under this condition."
Pursuant to the conditions of approval of the C.U.P., the
oil operator was required to post a $50,000.00 letter of credit
which is to be used by the City forreimbursements of its
attorney fees and costs forany subsequent litigation. The
letter of credit only requires that the City submit a statement
to the oil operator and provide an opportunity for payment
prior to calling on the letter of credit.
(ov )
11
OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
March 16, 1994
Page 2.
The City has recently submitted to McPhearson Oil Company
a request for reimbursement of attorney fees and costs which
have been incurred as a result of the litigation challenging
the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit. If these fees are
not paid within a reasonable time, the City has the right to
call upon the letter of credit and obtain full reimbursement.
It is important to note that the $50,000.00 letter of credit
does not constitute a maximum amount for which the City is
entitled to reimbursement. Pursuant to the conditions of
approval of the C.U.P., the City is entitled to full
reimbursement of all attorney fees and costs associated with
any legal challenge in this regard.
In addition to the above, the City is entitled to full
indemnification and a hold harmless by the permittee or any
"claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents,
officers or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this
permit (C.U.P.) approval...".
cc: Stephen Burrell, City Manager
20416
March 15, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of
of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
LA County Lifeguard and Beach Maintenance Services
Recommendation
It is recommended by staff that Council:
1. Receive and file the County Beaches and Harbors staff report .
2. Direct the City Council subcommittee to meet with representatives from the other
cities to discuss this issue and to prepare for the Public Hearing at the Board of
Supervisors.
3. Direct the City Attorney to prepare a report regarding the legal issues surrounding the
County's proposed potential service withdrawal.
Background
On March 15, 1994, Beaches and Harbors staff presented the attached recommendation to
the Board of Supervisors. The recommendation was approved by the Board.
Analysis
With the County's proposed 365 -day termination notices and three-year `Full cost
recovery" program, it is imperative that the City be prepared to respond to the
Supervisors at a public hearing with full knowledge of the potential deleterious impact this
action could have on beach visitors; the City and the County.
Noting the estimated $1 4 million the County spends to safeguard and clean Hermosa
Beach, the City's inability to subsidize this service now or in the near future is clear. With
that, the City needs to explore what legal obligation the County has to continue to provide
this service; what potential funding sources may be available to offset these expenditures
(i.e., the Hospital District); and what service alternatives exist (i.e., State Lifeguards and
maintenance contracts).
Despite the differences in beach ownership among our neighboring cities, a united front
from the impacted cities would provide a valuable information exchange and a cohesive
plea to the County. Some of the cities (Manhattan and Redondo Beach) have established
City Council subcommittees to deal with this issue. Staff would suggest that a meeting be
1
12
scheduled in the near future in preparation for the public hearing (County staff has
indicated that the formal hearing has not yet been scheduled).
With a cooperative effort between the cities, perhaps this long standing issue with the
County an be resolved successfully to the benefit of beach visitors for years to come.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ma , '_. ' ooney
As stant City Manager
Concur:
City Manager
2
'COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS
March 16, 1994
Mr. Stephen Burrell, City Manager.
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Dear Mr. Burrell:
RECEIVED
MAR 1 6 1994
CITY MGR. OFFICE
NOTICE OF AGREEMENT CANCELLATION
STAN WISNIEWSKI
DIRECTOR
JUDITH KENDALL
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
As you know, the Community Recreation Agreement for County
Lifeguard and Beach Cleaning Services at Hermosa Beach
expired on June 30, 1993. Since that time, the County has
continued to provide lifeguard and beach maintenance
services on a month-to-month basis while negotiations on
cost sharing continued.
On March 15, 1994, the County Board of Supervisors
considered the attached report, which proposes adoption of a
long-term funding policy for lifeguard and beach maintenance
services. Following their deliberations concerning the
report, the Board instructed me to send this letter
notifying you of the County's cancellation of the agreement'
and withdrawal of services from Hermosa Beach on April 1,
1995. County services could only be continued beyond that
date under terms of a new agreement, which would provide for
cost recovery by the County, phased in over a three year
period.
This action is necessitated by an estimated shortfall in the
County's 1994-95 budget of approximately $900 million. The
Department of Beaches and Harbors' 1994-95 budget will be
reduced accordingly, resulting in our inability to absorb
the nearly $1.4 million net cost of operating the City's
beach. Therefore, the City and County must prepare for the
City's assumption of responsibility for its beaches on April
.1, 1995, or reach an agreement on cost recovery.
In the near future, the Board of Supervisors will .hold a
public hearing on the loner -term financing policy. You and
your staff are invited to attend the hearing and to make a
presentation to the Board regarding the City's. reponse to •
TELECOPIER (310) 821-6345
(310) 305-9503 13837 FIJI WAY, MARINA DEL REY, CALIFORNIA 90292
Mr. Stephen Burrell
March 16, 1994
Page 2
the proposed County policy. I will contact your office as
soon as the hearing date and time are set. In the meantime,
if you have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact me at (310) 305-9522.
Very truly yours,
Giro Vvy°%
Stan Wisniewski
Director
SW:DRS:CW:be
Attachment
SALLY R. REED
CHIEF ADWRISTRATIVE OFFICER
March 3, 1994
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
713 ICENNE H HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION/LAS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012
(213) 974-1101
Executive Summary
PROPOSED LONG-TERM LIFEGUARD AND BEACH MAINTENANCE
FUNDING POUCY (3 -VOTES)
Rhe uest
Instruct the Executive Officer to schedule a public hearing, for the purpose of taking
public testimony and adopting a Tong -term funding policy which considers full cost
recovery of lifeguard and beach maintenance services at non -County owned beaches.
Instruct the Director of Beaches and Harbors to immediately:
— Provide a second notice to the State, reaffirming the County's intent to withdraw
services from the State beaches effective July 1, 1994. Concurrently, provide notice
to the City of Redondo Beach for services on the Redondo State Beach, because the
services under the State and City agreements are operationally. inseparable.
— Provide 365 -day termination notices to the cities of Avalon, Los Angeles, -
Hermosa Beach, Santa Monica, and Torrance, affirming the County's intent to
withdraw services from the cities' beaches on April 1, 1995, unless new agreements
are reached which lead to full recovery of the County's costs, phased -in over a three-
year period. The notice to the City of Avalon would indicate that the County expects
Avalon to continue providing the same level of funding, as proposed for 1993-94,
through April 1, 1995.
— Provide a copy of this letter to the State and affected cities, and invite them to the
public hearing to present their response to the proposed policy.
Fiscal Impact
Based on a projected County shortfall of $900 million for 1994-95, funding levels
throughout the County are expected to be significantly reduced,' and far below any
reasonable standard of need. As a result, County funding is no longer available to
finance beach operations at State beaches.
POUCYARSH
Executive Summary
March 3, 1994
Page 2
Issues
In the past, the State and cities have enjoyed quality lifeguard and beach maintenance
services without substantialty reimbursing the County for its expenditures. Because the
County of Los Angeles has historically sought to acquire control of beaches within its
boundaries for the purpose of providing an efficient, standardized level of service to the
public, Los Angeles County is the only California county providing lifeguard and beach
maintenance services to non -County owned beaches. In other counties, these services
are provided primarily by the State and, in some instances, by the cities.
The State and the cities are responsible for the services to their beaches, and have
revenue and taxation authority, not available to the County, which could more readily be
used to finance beach services.
SALLY R. REED
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
March 3, 1994
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
713 Im 4NRTH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION/LOS ANGELIM CALIFORNIA 90012
(213) 974-1101
The Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Los Angeles
383 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration •
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Dear Supervisors:
PROPOSED LONG-TERM UFEGUARD AND BEACH MAINTENANCE
FUNDING POUCY (3 -VOTES)
On December 14, 1993, on motion of Supervisor Dana, your Board instructed the
Chief Administrative Officer and the Director of Beaches and Harbors to report back with
a plan to achieve long-term funding from the State and cities for lifeguard and beach
maintenance services. The Board also instructed that a proposed policy be developed
on actions to be taken in the event the State and cities do not agree to provide the
necessary funding.
As instructed by your Board last June, the Department of Beaches and Harbors sought
cooperative arrangements with the affected jurisdictions to provide additional financing for
services to State and city owned beaches. However, these efforts have been overall
unsuccessful. Given the State's and cities' inability or unwillingness to substantially
increase their financial support for these services to date, and the projected $900 million
shortfall for 1994-95, we believe your Board should adopt a policy which sets specific
terms for financial participation by the cities and State.
Historically, the Board of Supervisors has recognized the County's regional responsibility
by participating in the funding of beach services. If, due to financial constraints, the
Board is no longer able to fund these services, we are recommending a proposed long-
term funding policy which provides for full cost recovery for services at non -County
owned beaches. In addition, we are recommending that your Board schedule a public
hearing to consider the adoption of this long-term funding policy. To ensure the County's
ability to absorb its 1994-95 budget curtailments, it is also recommended that the Board
authorize the immediate issuance of a second notice to the State reaffirming that services
will be withdrawn from the State beaches effective July 1, 1994. Additionally, it is
FOUCYJH
Honorable Board of Supervisors
March 3, 1994
Page 2
recommended that the Board authorize the issuance of 365 -day notices to the affected
cities, indicating that beach services will be withdrawn April 1, : 1995 unless new
agreements are reached, and instruct the Director of Beaches and Harbors to work with
the cities to develop agreements which phase in full recovery of the County's costs, over
three years.
Background
The County is facing a.$900 million shortfall in fiscal year 1994-95. As a result, funding
levels throughout the County are expected to be significantly reduced and far below any
reasonable standard of need. Property tax revenue, the County's primary source of
general purpose revenues, has financed lifeguards, beach maintenance, and many other
important services for decades. However, the availability of this revenue source has
diminished significantly.. For example, in fiscal year 1977-78 (.e., the year before
Proposition 13), property tax revenue comprised 40 percent of the County general fund
budget. Currently, property tax revenue comprises only 11 percent of the County general
fund budget, representing approximately a 70 percent reduction. The reduction is actually
greater, because property tax revenue must also be used to finance mandates, State and
Federal matching requirements, and general County operations, the costs of which have
continued to increase. During the last two fiscal years alone, the County's general
purpose revenues were reduced by 20 percent, due to the shift of property taxes to
schools. in comparison to the County, these State budget actions impacted cities to a
lesser degree, resulting in an average 5 percent reduction in their general purpose
revenues (see Attachment I).
The County of Los Angeles has historically sought to acquire control of beaches within
its boundaries for the purpose of providing an efficient, standardized level of service to
the public. Consequently, Los Angeles County is the only county in California providing
services on beaches it does not own. The State and cities, who are responsible for the
non -County owned beaches, have enjoyed superior lifeguard and beach maintenance
services, without substantially participating in the cost of these services. For several
years, the County has stressed that it would be unable to continue providing beach
POUCYJNIH
Honorable Board of Supervisors
March 3, 1994
Page 3
services, unless the State and cities made greater efforts to fund the costs. For fiscal
year 1994-95, the Department, assuming a continuation of current service levels,
estimates the net County cost for non -County owned beaches to be nearly $12.0 million
(see Attachment II).
In June 1993, as directed by the Board, the Director of Beaches and Harbors gave the
State a 365 -day notice of the County's intent to terminate services at the State beaches.
State officials have since declined to provide additional financing, which we requested in
order to continue current service levels at State beaches. They also indicated that in the
event the County withdraws services from the State beaches, the State may also seek the
return of the Will Rogers and Dockweiler State Beaches, which the County currently
operates via sub -contract through the City of Los Angeles.
The agreements with the cities of Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Santa Monica, and
Avalon expired on June 30, 1993. Understanding that the cities also face budgetary
constraints, the Department explored a wide range of alternatives to increase revenues
for beach services, such as increasing local fees and other revenues. However, these
options were not accepted by the cities. With the exception of Avalon, which is offering
a $254,000 increase, the cities have refused to provide any significant increase in
financing. Recently, the City Councils of Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach voted
to not provide additional financing, and the City Council of Hermosa Beach voted to
reduce its previous offer and limited the increase to only $18,500 for 1993-94.
State and cities have taxation and other revenue raising authority, not available to the
County, to finance beach services. In addition, a recent study documented that the cities
enjoy increased commerce, tax revenues, and other cash receipts as a direct result of the
public attendance at safe and well maintained beaches; we believe that a portion of these
revenues could be reallocated to fund beach services.
Honorable Board of Supervisors
March 3, 1994
Page 4
Recommended Long -Term Funding Policy
We recommend that the Board consider adopting a long-term funding policy, which
provides for full cost recovery of lifeguard and beach maintenance services at non -County
owned beaches. This policy assumes: that Proposition 172 monies and other County
general purpose funds are unavailable; that due to financial constraints, the Board can
no longer recognize any County regional responsibilities for these services; and, that while
the cities also face financial constraints, these jurisdictions are able to better finance these
services and have various taxation and other revenue raising authorities not available to
the County. At its February 16, 1994 meeting, the County Beach Advisory Committee
(CBAC) voted to endorse a similar approach, whereby the State and cities would be
required to finance 100 percent of the beach service costs on a phased -in basis.
We recommend the Director immediately send a second termination notice to the State,
reaffirming the County's intent to withdraw from the State beaches on July 1, 1994,
consistent with the previous cancellation notice sent June 1993; however, the Department
is pursuing a withdrawal as early as May 1994 to avoid a mid-season transfer. The notice
to the State should also indicate the. County's willingness to rescind its notice and
continue services, if the State agrees by May 1, 1994, to fully fund County costs
beginning in 1994-95.
For the City of Los Angeles' beaches, the County is required to continue services during
most of 1994-95 because a 365 -day notice is required, per the agreement. To provide
other affected cities a similar opportunity to plan for the delivery of services to their
beaches, we recommend the Director immediately send 365 -day termination notices to
the cities of Avalon, Hermosa Beach, Santa Monica, and Torrance, indicating that services
will be withdrawn April 1, 1995, unless new agreements are negotiated which provide for
full recovery of the County's costs, phased -in over a three-year period (see
Attachment Ill). Because the City of Redondo Beach is responsible for a portion of the
beach that is operationally inseparable from the State's contract, the notice to this City
must coincide with the notice to the State. In the case of Avalon, the Department is
recommending, under a separate letter, Board approval of an extension of that City's
POUCY.BEIM
Honorable Board of Supervisors
March 3, 1994
Page 5
contract through June 30, 1994, because the City has offered an increase in payment
from $46,000 to $300,000 for 1993-94. Therefore, the notice to the City of Avalon will
indicate that the County expects Avalon to continue providing the same level of funding,
as proposed for 1993-94, through April 1, 1995.
State and Cities' Response
It is difficult to determine the precise response of each jurisdiction. It is unlikely, however,
that the State would provide the equivalent level of lifeguard services that are currently
enjoyed by beach patrons, negatively impacting public safety. We believe the State
Department of Parks and Recreation would provide the beach services at the same level
that it currently provides elsewhere in the State, although they typically provide a lower
level of service which is consistent with needs at rural beaches. Nevertheless, should the
State desire to purchase beach services from the County, the Department will be available
to work with them to develop an agreement that leads to appropriate cost recovery.
Although the cities currently do not provide lifeguard services, we have learned that the
Redondo Beach City Manager has discussed the creation of a special district to provide
beach services to the South Bay.
In an effort to avoid these operating costs, the State and some cities may argue that
beach services are a regional responsibility of the County and may oppose a County
withdrawal from their beaches by persuading the courts to block the County's action.
However, County Counsel believes a court action by the State and cities would not be
successful. •
Honorable Board of Supervisors
March 3, 1994
Page 6
THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD:
1. Instruct the Executive Officer to schedule a public hearing, for the purpose of
taking public testimony and adopting a long-term funding policy which considers
full cost recovery of lifeguard and beach maintenance services at non -County
owned beaches.
2. Instruct the Director of Beaches and Harbors to immediately:
a. Provide a second notice to the State, reaffirming the County's intent to
withdraw services from the State beaches effective July 1, 1994. Concurrently,
provide notice to the City of Redondo Beach for services on the Redondo
State Beach, because the services under the State and City agreements are
operationally inseparable.
b. Provide 365 day termination notices to the cities of Avalon, Los Angeles,
Hermosa Beach, Santa Monica, and Torrance, affirming the County's intent
to withdraw services from the cities' beaches on April 1, 1995, unless new
agreements are reached which lead to full recovery of the County's costs,
phased -in over a three-year period. The notice to the City of Avalon would
indicate that the County expects Avalon to continue providing the same level
of funding, as proposed for 1993-94, through April 1, 1995.
d. Provide a copy of this letter to the State and affected cities, and invite them
to the public hearing to present their response to the proposed policy. .
Honorable Board of Supervisors
March 3, 1994
Page 7
Respectfully submitted,
Chief Administrative Officer
SRR:SW:LMJ
MH:mmg16
Attachments
c: Executive Officer, Board of Supervisors
County Counsel
Auditor -Controller
STAN WISNIEWSKI
Director of Beaches and Harbors
Attachment I
NET PROPERTY TAX LOSS FOR COUNTY AND BEACH CITIES
AS A PERCENTAGE OF GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUES
25
20
15
10
. 5
0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY HERMOSA LS ANGELES WC NDO BEACH TORRANCE
HERMOSA BEACH_NHATTAN B A MONICA
20.23%
2.58%
5.02%
5.16%
5.35%
5.07%
2.96%
3.70%
NOTE: NET PROPERTY TAX LOSS REFLECTED FOR FISCAL YEARS 1992-93 AND 1993-94, OFFSET BY PROPOSITION 172
REVENUE (VOTER APPROVED ONE-HALF CENT SALES TAX INCREASE). GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUES INCLUDE
PROPERTY TAXES, SALES TAXES, VEHICLE LICENSE FEES, AND OTHER GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUES, AS REPORTED
BY EACH AGENCY.
SOURCE DATA PROVIDED BY STATE CONTROLLER, CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CITES, AND AUDITOR -CONTROLLER.
DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS
1994-95 ESTIMATED BEACH COSTS*
Beaches Operated for the State
$5,225,000
$771,000
$4,454,000
Attachment 1
>COUNTY'SOF
EXPENDITURES
85%
Beaches Operated for Cities
Avalon
$672,000
$306,000
$366,000
54%
Hermosa Beach
1,425,000
33,000
1,392,000
98%
Los Angeles
8,037,000
4,311,000
3,726,000
46%
Redondo Beach
650,000
154,000
496,000
76%
Santa Monica
2,495,000
. 1,188,000
1,307,000
52%
Torrance
• 222,000
11,000
211,000
95%
Subtotal - Cities
$13,501,000
$6,003,000
$7,498,000
56%
Total State and Cities
$18,726,000
$6,774,000
$11,952,000
64%
Catalina Isthmus Rescue Boat
$369,000
$7,000
$362,000
98%
Beach Operated for Chevron
$130,000
$130,000
$0
0%
County -Owned Beaches
$4,304,000
$735,000
$3,569,000
83%
GRAND TOTAL
623,529,000
67,646,000
$16,883,000
68%
* Estimates based on current service levels, Includes negotiated salary Increases,
** Includes a distribution of overhead and other fixed costs that MI remain as departmental net County cost despite any
elimination of beach service.
POLK.Y 1 PAA:31111
FEBRUARY 25, 1954
Attachment III
TERMINATION OF BEACH SERVICES TO VARIOUS JURISDICTIONS
r
JURISDICTION
PROPOSED
TERMINATION DATE
COMMENTS
City of Hermosa Beach
April 1, 1995
The agreement expired on July 1, 1993, and beach services have been continued on a
month-to-month basis. The City Council recently voted to reduce its original offer, and
now only offers an $18,500 increase In 1993-94.
City of Santa Monica
April 1, 1995
The agreement expired on July 1, 1993, and beach services have been continued on a
month-to-month basis. The City has made no offer to reduce County costs.
City of Torrance
April 1, 1995
The County has no agreement with the City of Torrance for beach services.
State of California
- Dan Blocker
- Las Tunas
- Malibu
- Manhattan
- Point Dume
- Redondo
- Royal Palms
May 16, 1994- July 1, 1994
In June 1993, the Department provided the State with a 365 -day termination notice, as
required by the agreement, permitting services to be withdrawn from the eight State
beaches on July1. 1994. However, the Department is
pa pursuing a May 16, 1994
withdrawal, which the State is considering, to avoid a transfer mid-season. The State
indicated they may pursue the return of the Will Rogers and Dockweiler State Beaches,
because the revenues can be used to finance the State's costl of providing beach
services. Currently, the County provides the services at Will Rogers and Dockweiler via
sub -contract with the City of Los Angeles, who has an agreement with the State. The
Redondo Beach City contract expired on July 1, 1993, and services for the State beach
in the City of Redondo Beach have been continued on a month-to-month basis. The
withdrawal from the City of Redondo Beach would be concurrent with the withdrawal
from the State beach because they are Inseparable operationally.
City of Avalon
April 1, 1995
Withdraw lifeguard and paramedic services from the City. For 1993-94, the Avalon City
Council voted to Increase their contribution towards lifeguard and paramedic services
from the current amount of $46,000 to $300,000, and the Department will be
recommending Board approval to amend the contract amount and expiration date to
June 30, 1994 under separate Board letter. The Department will work with Avalon to
carry over the terms of the amendment through April 1, 1995, including the same level
of funding from Avalon as in 1993-94.
City of Los Angeles
- Cabrillo
- Dockweiler
- Venice
- Will Rogers
April 1, 1995
Provide notice of County's Intent to cancel agreement, which requires a 365 -day written'
notice for cancellation. County Counsel indicates that the County cannot unilaterally
reduce our contractual obligations by eliminating services during the 365 day notice
period.
POLICY.XBH (MM018)
March 3, 1994
1
1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 21, 1994
TO: Mayor and Council members
FROM: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager
RE:
City Council / School District / Parks, Recreation
and Community Resources Advisory Commission
Joint Study Session
.}.c:..,..n................ati..,....r........,...,..,....,.............,.,..,.c�n.....na::..'':':';�r,�';,''';.":':'<r.'•�J�•s•7ay.>'in1
After selecting a tentative date of April 14, 1994 for the above mentioned joint
study session, we were informed by the School District that this date would not
accommodate one of their members. We have, therefore, selected two more
dates that are agreeable to both the School District and the Parks, Recreation
and Community Resources Advisory Commission. They are as follows:
THURSDAY, MAY 12, 1994, 7:OOPM
OR
THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 1994, 7:OOPM
It is requested that Council consider and choose one of the above dates so that
we may begin the notification and agenda preparation process.
SUPPLEMENTAL jej
INFORMATIA I lj
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Date: MARCH 7, 1994 /
To: Viki Copeland, Finance Director °`—
From: Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide
Subject: Transient Occupancy Tax survey (other cities)
As requested, on. March 7, 1994 I contacted the following cities to ascertain the current
Transient Occupancy Tax rate charged by each city. As noted, some cities will be
changing the current rate.
CITY TAX RATE VERIFIED BY
Beverly Hills 14% Tony Dahlerbruch, Finance Department
Culver City 12% Alice Lieberman, Secretary to Treasurer
El Segundo 8% Margie Randall, Finance Director Secretary
(effective 4/1/94 9%, 1/1/95 10%)
Gardena 7% Jane Koetzner, Senior Account Clerk
Hawthorne 8% Liz Hooker, Account Clerk
Los Angeles - 14% Gloria Castillo, Clerk Tax/Permit Division
Manhattan Beach 8.5% Sherry Moreland, Business Office Manager
Redondo Beach 10% Ellie Steger, Administration Supervisor
Santa Monica 12% Dave Carr, Assistant City Treasurer
Torrance 11% Ben Murdock, Revenue Administrator
COMPILED BY FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 3/7/94
n(1r
MARCH 1, 1994
SUPPLEMENTAL �� a
INFORMATION
Curt Pringle
ASSEMBLYMAN, SIXTY-EIGHTH DISTRICT
:RECEIVED
SIR " 3 1994
CITY :;^� OFFICE
ASSISTANT REPUBLICAN LEADER CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE, STATE CAPITOL, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 445-8377 FAX: (916) 323-5467
February 25, 1994
Council Member
Hermosa Beach City Council
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear Council Member:
CHAIR, ASSEMBLY
REPUBLICAN CAUCUS
COMMITTEES:
REVENUE & TAXATION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
HUMAN SERVICES
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
REORGANIZATION
I am writing to inform you about a proposed constitutional
amendment which I have recently introduced in the State
Legislature, and to ask for your support of this measure.
Assembly Constitutional Amendment 34 is designed to end state
government's practice of passing unfunded mandates onto local
governments. It would do so by stating that laws implementing
mandates will not -take effect until 90 days after the Commission
on State Mandates determines that sufficient funds have been
appropriated by the Legislature to pay for the new costs. If
funds have not been appropriated, then the new law will not take
effect.
This proposal will clearly address the primary problem with
California's current system of funding mandates, which is the
reimbursement nature of that system. Currently, a local entity is
ordered by the state to implement a new program or higher level of
service and is forced to pay for it. Later the state reimburses
the local entity for performing the requested function. Typically,
however, this reimbursement arrives years after the fact. In the
meantime, local governments are forced to foot the bill for the
state program.
The declining revenues of the past years and the difficult
budgets which have resulted has brought this problem into greater
focus. I believe that local governments do not need the state to
tell them what to do with their scarce resources, and this
proposal is the strongest way to deliver that message. Clearly,
the state must stop mandating expensive requirements onto local
governments, forcing them to choose between raising taxes on
working families or cutting vital services.
DISTRICT OFFICE
12865 MAIN STREET, SUITE 100
GARDEN GROVE, CA 92640
(714) 638-1393
FAX (714) 638-1496
Printed on Recycled Paper
15 b
ACA 34
Page 2
However, your support is needed if we are to move this
proposal through the State Legislature and put it on the ballot
for the voters of California to decide upon. The legislation has
just recently been assigned to the Assembly Committee on Local
Government, and is set to be heard on March 9. A letter of
support sent to me and the committee would be of great help to
this end:
•
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any
questions_about my legislation.
URT PRINGLE
Assemblyman, 68th District
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE -1993-94 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 34
Introduced by Assembly Menlber Pringle
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Aguiar)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alby, Andal, Bowler,
Conroy, Goldsmith, Harvey, Haynes, Hoge, McPherson,
Morrow, Nolan, Rainey, Richter, Seastrand, Weggeland,
and Woodruff)
(Coauthor: Senator Lewis)
February 1, 1994
Assembly Constitutional Amendment No.. 34—A resolution
to propose to the people of the State of California an
1 amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending
Section 6 of, and by adding Section 6.5 to, Article XIII B
thereof, relating to state -mandated local costs.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
ACA 34, as introduced, Pringle. State -mandated local
programs.
. Existing provisions of the California Constitution require
that, whenever the Legislature; or any state agency mandates
ta new program or higher level of service on any local
government, the state shall reimburse the local government
for the cost of the program or increased level of service,
except for specified exemptions.
Jv This measure would, instead, provide that whenever the
Legislature or any state agency mandates any new program
or higher level of service on any local government, the state
° would be required to provide a subvention of funds to pay the
local government for the increased cost. It would modify and
add to the existing constitutional exemptions.
• This measure would further provide that no statute, other
J than certain specified statutes, and no executive order or
M,
99 80
ACA 34 —2—
regulation, that mandates a new program or higher level of
service on local government would become operative sooner
than 90 days after the Commission on State Mandates
determines either that the state is not required pursuant to
the measure to provide a subvention of funds for the
increased cost or that sufficient funds have been appropriated
to pay local government for the increased cost.
This measure would provide that whenever the Legislature
or any state agency mandates a limitation on, or exemption
from, a charge, fee, assessment, or tax levied by local
government or a decrease or redistribution of state
subventions or other state funds to local government which is
not offset by an equivalent reduction in the mandated costs
of the local government, the state would be required to
reimbursee amount of the
the local local nment for governmenth arising from the
revennueeloss theto
mandate. the
Existing provisions of statutory law prescribe
membership of the Commission on State Mandates and
prescribe the powers and duties of the Commission on State
Mandates with regard to the administration and
implementation of the statutory procedure for the disposition
of claims by local state -mandated local costsovernmental ities for the
reimbursement of
This measure would add to the Constitution the provisions
that prescribe the membership of the commission. It would
require the commission to investigate and monitor all
programs or higher levels of service enacted or adopted after
July 1, 1975, to determine if they are sufficiently funded, as
specified, and if not, would provide that t e Se dice outy f the locabe
l
entities to carry out the program
or
suspended and further compliance would be voluntary if
funding is not provided by the next succeeding fiscal year.
This provision would not apply to school districts, county
offices of education, or community college districts.
This measure would provide that any determination by the
commission pursuant to the measure may be set aside or
superseded by a resolution
the lmembersh p of each houseuced in the boyanf the
d
approved by 2/3
Legislature.
99 100
— 3 — ACA 34
Vote: %. Appropriation: no. Fiscal .committee: yes.
State -mandated local program: no.
1 Resolved by the Assembly, the Senate concurring, That
2 the Legislature of the State of California at its 1993-94
3 Regular Session commencing on the seventh day of
4 December 1992, two-thirds of the members elected to
5 each of the two houses of the Legislature voting therefor,
6 hereby proposes to the people of the State of California
7 that the Constitution of the State be amended as follows:
8 First—That Section 6 of Article XIII B is amended to
9 read:
10 SEC. 6. (a) Whenever the Legislatureor any state
11 agency mandates a new program or higher level of
12 service on any local government, the state shall provide
13 a subvention of funds to fuse seeh pay the local
14 government for the costs ef seeh increased cost of that
15 program or increased higher level of service, except the#
16 the begialetufe may, but need eet7 provide seek
)� 17 sitiwentietieffunds €efthe
18 (a) Legislative mandt tcs requested by the leeal
19 agene". affected; r .
20 (b) begislatieft dig a new crime of changing ae
21 existing dem ef efimc; of
22 {e} begisintiye ffiandetes enacted prior to January 47
23 1975, of executive eflefs of regulations Tally
24 ' legislation ienactcd prier to jannery };
25 1975. regardless of whether the mandate applies to public
26 or private entities other than local government.
27 However, the Legislature -may, but need not, provide a
28 subvention of funds for any increased cost arising from a
29 new program or higher level of service imposed by any
30 of the following:
j. 31 (1) A statute requested, by the local agency affected.
32 (2) A statute defining a new crime or changing an
33 existing definition of a crime, to the extent that the
34 increased cost relates directly to law enforcement-.
35 (3) A statute enacted prior to January 1, 1975, or an
36 executive order or regulation initially implementing a
37 statute enacted prior to January 1, 1975, including any
99 120
ACA 34 —4-
1 adjustments for, changes in cost of living or population. l J
2 (4) A statute, executive order, or regulation
3 implementing a federal law or regulation, to the extent
4 that the federal law or regulation specifically requires the
5 state without discretion to mandate a new program or
6 higher level of service on any local government.
7 (5) A statute, executive order, or regulation ry
8 implementing an initiative measure. approved by the
9 voters in a statewide election.
10 (6) A statute, executive order, or regulation that
11 specifically authorizes or requires the. imposition of a
12 charge, fee, assessment, or tax sufficient to fully
13 reimburse local government for any increased cost
14 arising from the mandate.
15 (b) There is hereby created the Commission on State
16 Mandates, which shall consist of five members as follows:
17 (1) The Controller.
18 (2) The Treasurer.
19 (3) The Director of Finance. •
20 (4) The Director of the Office of Planning and
21 Research. •
22 (5) A public member with experience in public
23 finance, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by
24 the Senate.
25 The public member shall serve for a term of four years ),,'
26 and may be reappointed, may receive per diem as
27 provided by the Legislature by statute for each day
28 actually spent in the discharge of official duties, and shall
29 be reimbursed for any actual and necessary expenses
30 incurred in connection with the performance of duties as
31 a member of the commission.
32 (c) The commission shall hear and decide upon a
33 claim by any local agency or school district that the local
34 agency or school district is entitled to be paid by the state
35 for costs mandated by the state as required by subdivision
36 (a). In carrying out its responsibilities under this section,
37 the commission may exercise those powers, shall perform
38 those duties, and shall operate under those procedures,
39 provided by law.
40 (d) No statute, other than an urgency statute, a statute ) 1
99 140 n"
)
)
—5— ACA 34
1 calling an election, a statute providing for a tax levy, or
2 a statute containing an appropriation for the usual
3 current expenses of the state, and no executive order or
4 regulation, that mandates a new program or higher level
5 of service on local government shall become operative
6 sooner than 90 days after the Commission on State
7 Mandates determines either that the state is not required
8 pursuant to subdivision (a) to provide a subvention of
9 funds for the increased cost arising from the new
10 program or higher level of service or that sufficient funds
11 have been appropriated to pay local government for the
12 increased cost
13 (e) Within 90 days of the effective date of any statute,
14 executive _.order, or regulation that is subject to
15 subdivision (d), the Commission on State Mandates shall
16 determine whether the state is required pursuant to
17 subdivision (a) to provide a subvention of funds for the
18 increased cost arising from the new program or higher
19 level of service mandated by the statute, executive order,
20 or regulation and, if so, whether sufficient funds have
21 been appropriated to pay local government for the
22 estimated increased cost.
23 (1) If the commission determines that the state is not
24 required to provide a subvention of funds pursuant to
25 subdivision (a) or that sufficient funds have been
26 provided, it shall so declare and the statute, executive
27 order, or regulation shall become operative 90 days
28 thereafter, unless a later time is otherwise provided by
29 law.
30 (2) If the commission determines that the state is
31 required to provide a subvention of funds but sufficient
32 funds have not been provided, it shall so declare and the
33 statute, executive order, or regulation shall not become
34 operative until 90 days after the commission
35 subsequently determines that sufficient funds have been
36 provided. r
37 Any determination made by the commission pursuant
38 to this subdivision shall be filed with the Secretary of
39 State.
40 (f) The Commission on State Mandates shall
99 150
ACA 34 — 6 --
1
1 investigate and monitor all statutes; executive orders, or
. 2 regulations imposing a new program or higher level of
3 service on local government enacted or adopted after
4 July 1, 1975, for which the state is required by subdivision
.5 (a) to provide a subvention- of funds, to determine
6 . whether the . increased costs of the new program or
7 higher level of service imposed has been funded and, if
• 8 so, whether the funding has been and continues to be
9 sufficient to pay for the increased costs. If the commission
10 determines that funding has become insufficient to pay
11 . for the increased cost, the commission shall so declare
12 and shall calculate the current amount of the increased
13 cost, and shall report that amount to the Legislature. If,
14 by the commencement of the next succeeding fiscal year,
15 the Legislature has not appropriated an amount
16 sufficient to pay the current amount of the identified
17 increased cost imposed on local government, the duty of
18 local government to incur the increased cost shall be
19 suspended and any increased cost . incurred shall be
20 voluntary until. the commission determines that sufficient
21 funds have been appropriated.
22 For purposes of this subdivision, "local government"
23 does. not include school districts, county offices of
24 education, or community college districts. •
25 (g) . Any determination by the Commission on State
26 Mandates pursuant to this section may be set aside or
27 superseded by a resolution introduced in the Assembly
28 and. approved by two-thirds of the membership of each
29 house of the Legislature. The state or any local
30 governmentmay bring an action in the courts by petition
31 fors.: administrative . mandamus to • appeal any
32 , determination by the commission.
33 .. • •.(h) , Any statute that disclaims or waives any obligation
34 imposed on the state by this section is invalid. Any statute
35 that requires any local government to waive its right to
36 reimbursement under this section or its right to decline
37. performance .of any mandate because of insufficient
38 funding as provided by this section is invalid. .
39 Second—That Section 6.5 is added to Article XIII B
40 ., thereof, to .read:.
99 170
')
s)
1
-7— ACA 34
1 SEC. 6.5. Whenever the Legislature or any state
2 agency mandates a limitation on, or exemption from, a
3 charge, fee, assessment, or tax levied by local government
4 or a decrease or redistribution of state subventions or
5 other state funds to local government which is not offset
6 by an equivalent reduction in the mandated costs of the
7 local government, the state shall reimburse the local
8 government for the amount of the revenue loss to the
9 local government arising from the mandate.
10 Third—That the amendments to Section 6 of Article
11 XIII B proposed by this measure, except as otherwise
12 expressly provided in subdivision (f), shall apply only to
13 increased costs arising from a new program or a. higher
14 level of service imposed on or after the operative date of
15 this measure.
16 Fourth—That this measure shall be interpreted
17 liberally to carry out the intent to preserve the limited
18 financial resources of local government by requiring the
19 state to pay for every new program, higher level of
20 service, or revenue loss mandated by the Legislature or
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
a state agency.
Fifth—That if any provision of this measure or the
application thereof to any person or circumstance is held
invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications of the measure which can be given effect
without the invalid provision or application, and to this
end the provisions of this measure are severable.
0
99 180
Dear Local Library Supporter:
Options for restoring full-time library service are being explored by our community. We
would encourage you, who also are affected by cutbacks in the Los Angeles County
system, to consider joining in a unified effort to establish what some of those options
might be, via a coordinated communication with county officials.
We are part of a subcommittee formed by the Hermosa Beach City Council that includes
members of the Council and representatives of our Friends group and of the local school
district. Our subcommittee has drafted the following letter to Sally Reed, the County
Administrative Officer, with a copy to be sent to County Librarian Sandra Reuben. It
might serve as a model for other cities or "friends" groups to use in drafting letters of their
own at this time. As crucial new decisions about library operations may be made shortly,
prompt action on the part of library supporters is important. The more broadly based an
inquiry to the County, we believe, the more likely that it will receive a helpful response.
John Bowler
Hermosa Beach City Councilman
Chair, Council Library Subcommittee
Al Valdes
President, FOL
Cathy McCurdy
Hermosa Beach City School
District Trustee
SUPPLEMENTAL Ig
INFOPM.AT!ON d
March 15, 1994
Dr. Sally Reed
L.A. County Administrative Officer
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Dear Dr. Reed:
In light of the precarious budget situation affecting branches of the county library
system such as ours, this community is considering options for maintaining or
enhancing current levels of operation. In this regard, we would appreciate receiving
from you clarification as to two potentially relevant issues.
First, we would like to know the county's policy on returning taxing authority to those
cities or special library districts (such as may be formed) that choose to withdraw from
the county library system. According to a January 1990 report to the California State
Library by its consultant Cy Silver, "If the responsibility for tax -funded library service
is transferred from an existing provider jurisdiction (e.g., the county) to a new one
(e.g., the city), there is transferred to the new provider the property tax rate that would
have been required to underwrite the budget for the area served by the former library
service provider. ...If the new jurisdiction is a general law city, then the property tax
amount so shifted goes into the city's general fund, to be allocated in the budget
process. If it is a special district library, it goes to the district itself as the library's
baseline income." This indicates a clear course of action that would result in a
substantial shift of revenue to any new local jurisdictions that may be formed.
Second, we would like a breakdown of those activities at the branch -library level that
could NOT be performed or supplemented by volunteers under the terms of the county
system's existing labor agreements. This, together with advice from professional
librarians, would figure in our consideration of seeking such help locally to boost the
service available under our current library affiliation.
The recent dissolution and planned restructuring of the regional library council raise
more questions that may need to be addressed directly to top county officials.
We'd appreciate your taking the time to respond to these matters during this difficult
period for all of us.
Honorable Mayor and March 15, 1994
Members of the City Council
ACTIVITY REPORT
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
FEBRUARY 1994
Attached for your information are recap sheets of department activity for
the month of February.
Permit activity slightly decreased in February as the department issued
only 87 permits of which 16 were building permits. No permits were issued
for new structures while twelve permits were issued for alterations or ad-
ditions to existing dwellings. Two permits were issued for alterations or
additions to commercial buildings. There was no change to the housing
inventory.
The department processed thirty-five plans for zoning review, plan check or
revisions. Plan processing "turn around" averaged two weeks during
February. The department conducted 67 inspections during February not in-
cluding complaint investigations.
The Business License division reports that 217 licenses were issued during
February resulting in revenue of $47,275.50.
The department logged 3 new code enforcement complaints during February
which were for illegal dwelling units. The department currently has nine
illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation.
Respectfully Submitted,
L 7iLG�� f1_ a.-Lcj 2cifre-c
Sherria Lawrence
Interim, Administrative Aide
Concu:
Michael Schubach
Interim, Bldg. & Safety Director
Noted:
Steve Burrell
City Manager
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
TYPE OF STRUCTURE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Month of February 1994
DWELLING
UNITS
PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION
1. Single Dwellings
2. Duplex Dwellings
3. Triplex Dwellings
4. Four Units or More
5. Condominiums
6. Commercial Buildings ,
7. Industrial Buildings
8. Publicly Owned Buildings •
9. Garages - Residential
10. Accessory Buildings ,
11. Fences and Walls 1 500.
12. Swimming Pools ,
13. Alterations, additions or
repairs to dwellings 12 73,025.
14. Alterations, additions or
repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 2 15,900.
15. Alterations, additions or
repairs to indus. bldgs. ,
16. Alterations, additions or
repairs to publicly owned bldgs.
17. Alterations, additions, repairs
to garages or accessory bldgs.
18. Signs
19. Dwelling units moved
20. Dwelling units demolished
21. Other permits not listed:
Deck
•
•
TOTAL PERMITS:
1
16
2,200.
TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS:
91,625.00
**
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 0
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 0
NET CHANGE: 0
NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 93/94 +1
CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 9705
(INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED)
**
Revised figure based on land use study by the Planning Dept.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
Month of February 1994.
NUMBER OF THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY
PERMITS CURRENT MONTH LAST FY DATE TO DATE
Building 16 25 80 182
Plumbing 7 14 48 149
Electric 11 9 40 122
Plan Check 9 11 49 121
Sewer Use 0 0 1 1
Res. Bldg. Reports 19 10 68 124
Comm. Inspections 20 26 74 161
Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 0
In lieu Park & Rec. 0 0 1 2
Board of Appeals 0 0 1 0
Sign Review 3 15 14 35
Fire Flow Fees 1 2 10 34
Legal Determination 0 0 0 0
Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0
TOTALS
86 107 386 931
FEES
Building** 2,045.87 4,546.77 23,691.60 58,094.94
Plumbing 390.55 965.80 3,471.97 11,190.55
Electric 1,249.00 710.40 5,310.85 14,974.55
Plan Check 1,543.09 1,756.90 15,143.06 35.391.57
Sewer Use 0 0 0 342.53
Res. Bldg. Reports 826.50 435.00 4,045.75 5,329.25
Comm. Inspections 1,049.00 1,131.00 3,878.50 6,842.75
Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 0
In lieu Park & Rec. 0 0 0 20,792.00
Board of Appeals 0 0 325.50 0
Sign Review 206.00 781.00 1,420.50 2,802.00
Fire Flow Fees 15.00 159.00 4,212.00 35,678.25
Legal Determination 0 0 0 0
Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0
TOTALS
7,325.00 10,485.87
61,499.73 191,438.39
VALUATIONS 91,625.00 220,243.00 2,446,576.00 4,021,263.00
**Includes State Seismic Fee $10.91
Revenue:
Licenses issued:
BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT
47,275.50 41,932.51
217 203
300,572,32 281,231.11
March 15, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT, MARCH 1994
STATISTICAL SECTION
Finance Administration
CURRENT I THIS MONTH I FY TO
MONTH LAST FY DATE
LAST FY
TO DATE
Invoices 40 20 374 342
Cash Receipts 1,502 2,021 13,539 12,848
Warrants 285 235 2,191 2,198
Purchase Orders 323 262 3,162 2,467
Discounts taken $427.68 $500.44 $2,541.65 $1,828.44
UUT Exemptions
filed to date 815 712
Payroll
Full time 148 162
Part time 60 54
Finance Cashier
MONTH
CURRENT I THLASTIS OFYH I DATED I TOT FY
S DATE
Citation payments 3,191 2,917 29,166 25,573
Payments rec'd (DMV) 398 519 3,031 3,795
Delinquent Notices sent:
California 1,819 28 16,645 16,853
Out -of -State 25 149 830 955
Dismissals 370 480 3,932 3,904
Booting revenue $ 6,705 $ 9,546 $47,057 $67,856
1
Finance Cashier
(cont'd)
CURRENT I THIS MONTH
MONTH LAST FY
FY TO I LAST FY
DATE TO DATE
Parking permits:*
Driveway Permits 4 ** 14 **
Guest Party Passes 93 ** 1,935 **
Contractor Permits 7 ** 43 **
Daily Permits -0- ** 15 **
Annual Preferential:
Transferable 1,060 ** 1,415 **
Vehicle 1,112 ** 1,818 **
RTD bus passes* 48 ** 422 **
Animal licenses* 22 ** 971 **
Traps rented* 1 ** 9 **
* These statistics were added effective March 1993.
** Not applicable until March 1994.
NOTED: Respectfully submitted:
Stephen B ' e 1 Viki Copeland,
Finance Director
City Manager
HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAt
R YEAR 1994
Feb 1, 1994
FIRE STATISTICS
This Month
This Month
Year to Date
Last Year
One Year Ago
To Date
Total Calls
49
56
128
134
TYPES:
FALSE ALARMS
4
5
15
19
MUTUAL AID
2
0
5
1
PARAMEDIC ASSIST'
34
27
60
59
RESIDENCE FIRE
3
7
14
13
COMMERCIAL FIRE
1
0
6
6
VEHICLE FIRE
2
0
5
1
HAZARDOUS MTLS.
0
5
7
9
OTHER
3
12
16
26
EST, FIRE LOSS IN $
11000
8500
86500
13800
PARAMEDIC STATISTICS
Total Responses
51
65
100
131
TYPES:
No Patient/aid
3
5
4
12
Medical
24
34
53
64
Trauma
23
26
43
55
Auto Accident
8
5
18'I
14
Assault.
8
1
9
7
Jail Cali
3
4
3
8
Transports
36
14
631
53
Base Hosp, Con,
20
14
32
33
Trauma Center
1
0
1
0
r
INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION
This Month
This Month
Year to Date
Last Year
(primary)
One Year Ago
to Date
Commercial
39
75
42
118
Assembly
0
1
0
1
Institutions
0
1
0
1
Industrial
0
4
0
4
Apartments
16
3
35
8
(re—inspections)
Commercial
12
33
39
50
Assembly
3
0
0
0
Institutions
0
1
0
1
Industrial
0
0
0
0
Apartments
8
33
16
56
Fumigations
8
9
25
15
Noted:
Respectful Submitted'
SPO ► ''
Dl�+ac
Steve 'r, , City Manager
Edward Chesson, Acting Fire Chief
March 10, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
ACTIVITY REPORT - FEBRUARY 1994
Current This Month FY to Last FY
STATISTICAL SECTION Month Last Year Date To Date
Worker Comp Claims:
Claims opened 3 4 32 43
Claims closed 5 2 26 36
Total open 68 62 N/A N/A
Current Employees 21 N/A N/A N/A
Active Cases 7 N/A N/A N/A
Lost time (Manhours)
Safety
Non -safety
Liability Claims
291 20 638 1916
220 301 2383 3123
Claims opened 5 2 29 13
Claims closed 3 5 25 27
Total open 27 19 N/A N/A
Employee Involved
Vehicle Accidents
Safety 0 1 0 4
Non -safety 0 0 5 1
Employee Turnover
Safety 1 0 6 0
Non -safety 0 0 14 1
General Appropriation Secretary
The following summary indicates the amount
the assigned functions:
February: 150 hours available
Word Processing Mail Processing
70% (105 Hrs) 10% (15 Hrs)
Avg. 7 Hrs/day Avg. 1 Hr/day
Word Processing Services by Department
Finance : 34% (36 Hrs) Public Works
City Manager: 4% ( 4 Hrs) Personnel
Respectfully Submitted
Robert A. Blackwood, Director
Personnel and Risk Management
wp/act
of time spent on each of
Noted:
Directory/Dept Support
20% (30 Hrs)
Avg. 2 Hrs/day
: 30% (31 Hrs)
: 32% (34 Hrs)
Stephen R. Burrell
City Manager
March 14, 1994
HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
March 22, 1994
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
FEBRUARY, 1994
STAFF REPORT PREPARED
SUBJECT
THIS
MONTH
THIS MONTH
LAST FY
FY TO
DATE
LAST FY
TO DATE
APPEAL
0
0
7
3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO)
0
0
0
1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL)
0
3
11
24
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT
0
2
3
10
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION
0
1
0
1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION
2
1
4
8
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
0
0
0
2
FINAL MAP
0
0
1
0
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
0
0
7
1
HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION
0
N/A
2
N/A
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
0
0
0
0
NONCONFORMING REMODEL
1
0
6
6
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
0
0
0
2
PARKING PLAN
0
0
3
3
SPECIAL STUDY
5
2
31
17
SUBDIVISION
0
0
1
0
TEXT AMENDMENT
0
4
4
17
TRANSIT
1
0
3
3
VARIANCE
0
0
0
1
ZONE CHANGE
0
0
0
0
MISCELLANEOUS
5
8
42
36
TOTAL REPORT PREPARED
14
21
125
135
NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be
listed and counted only once.
MEETINGS / SEMINARS
MEETINGS
16
25
158
225 I
WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP
PASSENGERS
TI -IIS
MONTH
TI -IIS MONTH
LAST FY
FY TO
DATE
LAST FY
TO DATE
HERMOSA BEACH
1027
841
8201
8140
REDONDO BEACH
4001
4310
36724
39314
SATELLITE
459
485
3863
3452
Cp✓e
The following Activities were Undertaken for Transit Projects
1. Routine tasks.
Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council / Initiated by
1. Special study of zoning requirements for small lots / City Council and Planning
Commission.
2. Special study and text amendment to add a definition and method of determination for
grade for the purpose of measuring building height / Planning Commission.
3. Special study and text amendment to examine Article 13 of the zoning ordinance
regarding nonconforming buildings and uses / Planning Commission.
4. To eliminate or modify the requirement that City Council modifications to development
permits, on appeal, be referred to the Planning Commission for review and comment /
City Council.
5. Special study to add or delete Conditional Use Permits for various uses, and general
review of the permitted use list for commercial zones / City Council.
Long Term Projects Underway
1. Recover permit authority from Coastal Commission.
2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and
procedural correctness.
3. Updating General Plan Elements.
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
NOTED:
Stephe ' urrell
City anager
mic/activ.doc
Respectfully submitted,
Administrative Aide
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR
1994
February a
.
POLICE
OFFENSES REPORTED
.
This Month This Month
Year to Date
Last Year
Murder ..� _
Rape
Rape
One Year Ago
To Date
0
0
0 0
..................-. ..............—....
3 1
2
....,.-
m.—.--------
0
Robbery
Assault
4
10
. 2
7
8 6
18 15
Burglary (Total)
29
30
60 61
Burglaries (Vehicle)
7
4
13 10
Burglaries (Residential)
194 22
38_
9
.
59
41
Burglaries (Commercial
Larceny
3
28
4
40
10
71
Motor Vehicle Theft
DUI
18
16
. 8
28
24 14
.
59 71
All Other Offenses
242
250: 475 483
Disturbance Calls
156
143
.
326 313
.
Adults
PERSONS
_ 55
ARRESTED
82
7
141 168
Juveniles
2
5 10
Criminal Citations
66
66
126 126
Bicycle/Skateboard Cites
0
0
.
0 0
TRAFFIC REPORT
ACCIDENTS
Fatal
Injury
1 0 1
0
4 6 12
14
Property Damage Only
CITATIONS
. 24
220
45
43
Traffic
305
214
607
516
Parking
_..._..... w ._
3
90
22
�✓� 99
_______
w
µ ,... m
Total Calls
POLICE
1862
CALLS FOR SERVICE
1808 3843
3789
.
.
Pg 1 of 2
This Month
PARKING
0
This Month
Year to Date
Last Year
One Year Ago
ENFORCEMENT
To Date
Parking citations issued
Vehicle impounds/boots
4313
5051
0
8322
9060
127
FOR SERVICE
136
54 63
PARKING ENFORCEMENT CALLS
Total Pkg Calls
81
0 113
157
189
ANIMAL
CONTROL
A/C citations issued
6 8
27
p
58
84
Total of Animal Pick ups
of these
29
O 33
86
90
# returned to owner
11
18
37
44
# taken to shelter
# Injured, taken to Vet
16
2
7
0
5
45
4
36
7
# Deceased
10
b
9
o
29
28
ANIMAL CONTROL CALLS FOR SERVICE
Total AC Calls
45
48
91
94
6
4
........................
....
...._..........._.._........._.........
.... ...«. .......w
....p
O
Noted:Respectfully
1
41 id
Submitted,
.
4
14. 1v4;4424#2—
Steve Burrell, Ci Manager
4
Val Straser
Chief of Police
9
Pg 2of2
March 15, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - FEBRUARY 1994
The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions:
Administration, Engineering and Maintenance.
ADMINISTRATION
The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all
divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of
the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of
capital improvement projects.
Permits Issued:
Type
Current This Month FY Last FY
Month Last FY To Date To Date
Sewer Demolition 0 0 2 4
Sewer Lateral 0 0 0 8
Street Excavation 5 5 28 34
Utility Co's only 0 0 1 118
Dumpster/Strand 6 1 12 10
Banner Permits 0 0 2 4
ENGINEERING
The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are:
CIP 92-141 Street Rehabilitation CIP 92-501 Biltmore Park
CIP 89-144 Strand Wall & Walkway CIP 92-508 Park Irrigation Improvements
CIP 88-201 Light Conversion & CIP 92-513 Develop Expansion of Edith
New Installations Rodaway Friendship Park
CIP 92-408 Sanitary Sewer Imp. CIP 92-515 Develop South School Site
CIP 90-616 Earthquake Reinforcement of
Clark Building
MAINTENANCE
The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the
following sections:
- Parks/Medians
- Street Maintenance/Sanitation
- Sewers/Storm Drains
- Street Lighting,
- Traffic Safety
- Building Maintenance.
- Equipment Service
J. .
Parks Division/Medians: City-wide repair of irrigation systems and
graffiti removal. Prepared Clark Field for Little League. Prepared the
Community Center for "Gala". Removed tree in front of City Hall. Repaired
storm damage. Assist in new project at Edith Rodaway Park. Maintained
medians city-wide.
Street Maintenance/Sanitation: City-wide sweeper route. Hand sweeping of
walk streets. Trash route city-wide. Assist in Clark Field preparation.
Repaired Strand cracks and raised areas. City-wide removal of trees,
repair of sidewalks, repair of storm damage and pot hole repair. Assisted
in Strand lighting repairs.
Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Rodded sewers city-wide. Opened storm
drains. Assisted in preparation for "Gala" and Clark Field opening.
Repaired storm damage. City-wide graffiti removal.
Street Lighting: Banner installation and removal. Assisted in Strand
lighting project. Repair/replace street lights. Assisted in preparation
of Clark Field.
Traffic Safety Division: Repair scoreboard at Clark Field. Repair/replace
street lights and signs city-wide. Assisted with Strand lighting project.
Assisted in storm damage repair.
Building Maintenance Division: Routine janitorial work. Assisted in
preparation for the "Gala" and Clark Field. Painting and building repairs
city-wide.
Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment.
Graffiti Removal:
FY 92-93 FY 93-94
JULY 1992
AUGUST 1992
SEPTEMBER 1992
OCTOBER 1992
NOVEMBER 1992
DECEMBER 1992
JANUARY 1993
FEBRUARY 1993
MARCH 1993
APRIL 1993
MAY 1993
JUNE 1993
YTD TOTAL
33.50
28.50
39.50
11.00
37.00
17.50
17.00
24.00
66.00
25.50
54.50
51.50
Hrs.(Revised)
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
405.50 Hrs.
Respectfully submitted,
Amy Amirani
Director of Public Works
mon2/pwadmin
JULY 1993
AUGUST 1993
SEPTEMBER 1993
OCTOBER 1993
NOVEMBER 1993
DECEMBER 1993
JANUARY 1994
FEBRUARY 1994
YTD TOTAL
Noted:
36.50(Revised)
58.50 Hrs.
19.50 Hrs.
23.50
17.00
24.00
90.00
14.50
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
Hrs.
283.50 Hrs.
Stephen Bu; rell
City Mana er
i
March 8, 1994
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 1994
Department of Community Resources
Activity Report for February 1994
The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for
the month of February.
RECREATION PROGRAMMING
Sand And Strand Race The rain stopped and there was a wonderful turn out for this
annual event. Approximately 300 participants took part in both the 2.5 mile race as well
as the 5.0 mile race that is unique to Hermosa Beach. The South Bay Free Clinic and
South Bay Distance Runner's Club assisted in producing this successful event.
CPR Project Heartsaver Clinic. In cooperation with the Hermosa Beach Firefighters the
department was able to train and certify 20 Hermosa Beach residents in Adult CPR. The
classes held in the City Council Chamber were taught by Mark Klein.
Adult Ski Adventure to Bear Mountain. With the recent rains here at the beach, the local
mountains were full of snow. This made for excellent conditions for the 40 participants
who hit the slopes for a day of fun.
Slow Pitch Softball Registration. Once again the slow pitch softball league proved to be a
tremendous success. A total of 18 teams filled the league in an hour. This season has a
Men's B, C and D League.
Spring Class Registration. Hermosa Beach residents began registration on February 8 and
non-residents registration accepted on February 16. There has been a tremendous
response to recreation classes, with the most popular being tennis, beach volleyball, hatha
yoga, Tai Chi. Revenue from class and slow pitch registration total over $23,000.
Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation
The Community Center Foundation has opened the 1994 season with the exciting drama
"DANGEROUS LIAISONS". The Opening Night Gala Celebration was complete with a
champagne reception at intermission and a elegant post show buffet in the Community
Center Courtyard. Over 200 guests were treated to many tables filled with decadent food
prepared by Chez Melange. The evening was completed with a strolling magician and a
mime Tickets for all shows are on sale at the Theatre box office.
Facility 3/94 User Hours 3/93 User Hours
Field Closed Closed
Theatre 122 100
Clark 190 165
Gym 227 235
Room 8 79 76
Room 10 97 72
Room 12 83 61
DEPARTMENT REVENUE
Current - This Month FY Last Fy
Month Last Fy To Date To Date
$32,465 $36,850 $228,253 $236,850
Revenue Projection: $382,000
Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 66% of the fiscal year is
$228,253 or 60% of the projected figure.
Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 66% of the fiscal year is
$215,402 or 60% of the projected figure of the budget FY 1993-94.
Respectfully Submitted,
John A. Newell
Recreation Specialist
Community Resources Dept.
Concur:
Ma oney, Director
C s mmunity Resources Dept.
Ste .f 7n Burrell
City Manager
..
Seawright double Said
and Strand .rncewinner
by Kevin Cody
Annie Seawright maintained
her title as the South Bay's pre-
mier woman distance runner
Sunday by finishing first in the
2.5 mile Sand and Strand Run,
and 45 minutes later, finishing
first in the 5mile Sandand Strand
race in the past nine years.
Seawright finished first in the
Manhattan Beach Hometown
Faire 10K for the past two years,
and is a six -time winner of the
International Surf Festival 2 -mile
Sand Run.
Seawright ran the 8 a.m. 2.5
u >.
▪ 11
a rd
• R• 0
i.
W M . J
• aU
a
•S
)9
ob
at
- • o4
▪ V
0
o p
• u
M •�
IHS • Q
b
0
z4Gil
au
a• b )•
•
o gx
o
ov •
ili
SaQ
g
a • • qO
slow-gl5'r�''Q'td
-itch re .
j.� ,. OIZ
-.Hermosa Beach's adult .slow -pitch
league will . hold registration Tuesday,
Feb. 8, 7 a.m., at the Hermosa Beach
Community Center;' 710 :Pier Ave.
:")7. .:1. J: ".
1
Registration fees are $385 per team plus 1
''a $50 forfeit fee. Games are held at Clark '!
;Stadium and begin the week of March '1
A. For morelnformation, call 318-0280. j
• HERMOSA
BEACH
Ski trip
The Hermosa Beach
Recreation Department will
sponsor a ski trip to Bear
Mountain Ski Resorts Feb. 27
departing from the Hermosa
Community Center, 710 Pier
The bus will leave at 5 a.m.
and return at 8 p.m.
Cost of $37 includes lift
tickets and transportation.
Registration deadline is
Monday.
Call 318-0280.
Sunday, February 6
Sand and strain 0
The 42nd annual Sand and Strand
run to benefit the S.B. Free Clinic will
kick off this morning at 8 a.m. for the
2.5 mile run and 9 a.m. for the two
lapper 5 mile race. The start/finish line
is the south side of the Hermosa Pier
and the course which is roughly 55
percent sand and 45 percent Strand
takes you up to Longfellow on the sand,
across to the Strand and down to 7th SL,
then back to the sand to the H.B. pier.
, Late fee registration is S 14 for one race
and a shirt, $ 15 for both races or S 11 for
no shirt and one race and $ 12 for both
races and no shirt. For more informs-
: tion you can contact the Hermosa Com-
•munity Resources Dept. at 318-0280.
•
day (310) 377. -5501 pct 245 (free).
BEACH RUN -42nd annual Beach
-Sand and Strand run to benefit
South Bay Free Clinic and' city of
'414ermosa Beach; 8 .ani. Sunday;
;entry•'forms required; •:=(310) r318-2521 (S11-515, •(depending.on
length of race). includes commem-�
orativeT-shirt)•
: ''.`ewfn4FARTS' BREAKFAST—St.
42nd Sand, StrafldRuri
Runners may sign up for the 42nd annual Sand and Strand
fun run until the morning of Feb. 6.
Rain or shine, the 15 -mile race starts at 8 a.m.
The 5 mile race begins at 9 a.m. Walkers are welcome in
both events.
The course for both races begins at the south side of the
Hermosa Pier, goes north along the water's edge to Longfellow, -
then on the Strand south to 7th Street, where participants
again take to the sand until the finish at the pier.
The 5 -mile race is two laps of the circuit. organizers are the
HB. Department of Community Resources. The South Bay
Free Clinic and South Bay Distance Runners.
Sponsors include Easy Reader, Learned Lumber,
Delays Printing, Good Stuff and Nike. ER•
/4- 6-2a 20, /997
rrn rims -up;forSand.andStrandl run l
.P` • .,. Y.�. '�f S- :.SLi_.14:i.. �.� .. .-- — ', S 7x11.1 �'. x._•..:� 5 I
Iol'1 ,•�'1�', i h
'.The42nd:annual Hermosa
Beach Sand and Strand run will
.: be held at 8 a.m. Feb. 6 ati the • .
Hermosa Beach Pier. :4 .9 t : 1
Runners and walkers may.
• choose a 2.5 mile course, a = �—
5 -mile course or both.
<.. Preregistration fee, including {�
-. a T-shirt, is $12 for one race or::x
$13 for two. Participants who .
• do not want a T-shirt can "1.
• register
% -
register for $9. Families with •
four or more runners also pay.
$9 per participant.
•• Participants registering after A
:-,Feb. 2.pay an additional, $2 per
c
entry.
- The Sand and Strand will' :
.'"!.;•
include music, a prerace aerobic' I:
warm-up, raffle prizes and ''a'•;'-'1
..,muffins, fruits and juices for.:
participants. • • . .
. Proceeds will benefit the"
,-' South Bay Free Clinic and the , •..
' :city of Hermosa Beach.
;:if For entry form or further •'"
"'- Easy Reader/Redondo Beach News, January 14, 1994
:r
• details, call 318-2521. I
15
• ENTRY n. n.V.aml Wd. 7i..T 2. I>M
OCAOIM L. fl.ph•r.s Ip N N. 0w. •
.• !NOW In •.. Sem..
• PUN OATS MN.,. Pans" A IMP M. .*•i.
• TW U•I. .LII..M
stacts 110 rim
• PAY7.Y Fax . nm p.•np. es U. ..r
DISCOUNT - !2.411 •7.00 .d• OdI le. 4..•*
Y..q'.*..• Mut be •M•111•111.
: PAIRIO Fm. putt. rr.i 1» Solt
•
•
•
• MG. .T. 1u.• NM al ...a.. O..2. IArtt.e ►Yr
• . .. .... .eo. . ..v IMP M.
• PACS Md MV .r••.. "WY. Meow/ ..
COUNTS I...m• Oda
• RACE OAT M•.r m r .• pk*.d y d
I.O •, •... ••• ru.•r . M no•
/. 7r I I Me M 7....7 N..
for M. f0 Imo - •b no.
• Ta118TT1 . Td..• I. drt:WO moo •7.
Palk Som•I. - 61 N. A.m.
•
AAS /war* oral pb.l w../.or•d rN
ft •
ENTRY FORM
. For the 42nd Annual Sand SC Strand Run In Hermosa Beach
February 6, 1994
(Al
NMI(
111I11I 111111111
S
1111111 111111
1
CITY
III 1I
1111111111111111111
II
61R1N DATE
1;1;1 IZ1 Ili
AC1 111ONC
LII
STATE 2,7
II
11
II I-II1I-1 1 1 I
FEE (check and ORLa1Ld
W/74.2•111rT
0 2.5 Mlle Rao $1200
05.Omile "Lao . $1200 .
0 Both Rams $1100
1111
NO Ti1'1T DTVTSION IcA.e6 orrl
a012$•rd.
•• '.h01) -IS
$900 .. .. � c01$ -IS
d0I9.2T
•022.29
$0.00 '
$12.00
Lade H.MMelm Add sue
MRkP t`han`k nnvAhlll trr HRR _ cRFr
I030-)9
$0 10-.9
h 0 S0 -S9
1060 • 69
070 pke
., L N\ �� •
I.. U 8
3 3 CI � rsl ,..„,
N L_ I.O.
• _ .o '-`' u
I) • o
• Li. Cl.
in C O` o
u _at
E m
U
Tou
O ', E4:•m �f-�
o ' v .c
Ilialhil a..)
E CF—CM cri n' �` a, 3 f- E
N Q, •
i = 5
ia oN v o
u CT [i
E v
-0
a,
W CN
M Cl
0 oo
ti el O h
Ua�.
•.,.D 7
�C L.
C �, v v
OC2,.0 E
>C >
s
_
s C O u u
2. 3 .,_
N ° F- a
4
w00
r'1
-o
U
Cl
N
C
tU
u
I-.
CI▪ .
I(1
V-1
)`\
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAINING PROGRAM
SCHOOL/SEMINAR APPLICATION
NAME: Jean Witte Brian DATE: 03/17/94
SS # : 349-26-6194 PRESENT ASSIGNMENT: Support Services -Clerk Typ
COURSE INFORMATION
COURSE NAME: DATATRIEVE TRAINING COURSE, basics
LOCATION: - ONTARIO POLICE DEPARTMENT
START DATE/TIME : 04/ 18/94 0800/1700 END DATE/TIME: 04/20/94 0800/1700.
SPONSORED BY: CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT at ONTARIO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TOTAL NO. OF HOURS: 24 Hrs. TUITION: $150.00 per day
OTHER FEES (REGISTRATION, MEMBERSHIP, ETC.):
REIMBURSEABLE?: YES X NO POST PLAN #: STC:
LODGING: PROVIDED BY SCHOOL MOTEL REQUIRED X COMMUTE
TRANSPORTATION: AIR x PERSONAL VEHICLE CITY VEHICLE
SUPERVISORY/MANAGEMENT ENDORSEMENTS
INITIATED BY: T.A. Roblin SERIAL #: 071
IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR: APPROVE DENY
DIVISION COMMANDER: APPROVE DENY
TRAINING MANAGER: APPROVE DENY
CHIEF OF POLICE: APPROVE DENY
.USE OF FORM
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETE AND BEAR ALL SIGNATURES PRIOR TO BEING
•FORWARDED TO THE TRAINING MANAGER.
APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE TRAINING MANAGER A MINIMUM
OF 30 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE STARTING DATE OF THE COURSE.
ALL COURSE RESERVATIONS WILL BE MADE BY THE TRAINING MANAGER.
ATTACH ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS/INFORMATION TO THIS FORM..
COMMENTS RELATED TO APPLICATION SHOULD BE NOTED BELOW.
APPLICANT COMMENTS
This class is essential in order for the Detective Bureau to utilize the standardized.
data I have been entering in LEADER software for the past FIVE years. At this time
I am unable to do the complex SHRLOC searches which would yield a wealth of
information that is vital to track criminal trends and information so necessary
in solving crimes. Attending this class would enable me to tap into this
valuable unused source of criminal data.
IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR COMMENTS
DIVISION COMMANDER COMMENTS
TRAINING MANAGER COMMENTS
APPROVED:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
COMMENTS:
CHIEF OF POLICE
DISAPPROVED: HOLD:
rev. 012689 (corse)
i •
Liais
Mir
By Kathryn Martin
The first few minutes • of
Christopher Hampton's "Les
Liaisons Dangereuses (Danger-
ous Liaisons)," staged at the
Hermosa Beach Civic Theatre,
can be a little disorienting. .
All the usual ingredients are
in place: sex, violence, romance,
intrigue. But there's something
else there, something peculiar.
It's ... intelligent dialogue. \
Dulled by too many films and
TV dramas full of grunts, four-
letter words and sweating bed-
room scenes, some of us have
gotten lazy in our viewing hab-
its. If by chance a decent line
appears, we've always got the
rewind -and -replay option.
But live theater, is, well. live.
So, to appreciate an elegantly
crafted work like "Les Liai-
sons," a sort of mental gearshift
is required. Once made, the ef-
fort is well worth it.
The drama plays against the
backdrop of decadent Paris so-
ciety just before the French
Revolution. La Marquise de
Merteuil (Jennifer Eleanor
Brandt) has hatched a plot to
extract revenge from a former
lover who has just become en-
gaged to a wealthy, convent -ed-.
ucated (i.e., virginal) young
woman. Cecile Volanges (Chris-
tine Bonn).
Merteuil enlists the help of
notorious womanizer and old
flame. Le Vicomte de Valmont
(Jongiorgi Enos) to "soil" the
' deliciously ev
REVIEW
LES LIAISONS DIUIGEREUSES. vmtten by
C -rstopner Hampton. directed by Tony Tonisi,
produced by Anne Mtegard. lighting Design by
Henn M. Sorg, stage manager Cnns Ckerstrom.
naw and makeup designer Laura Moew, prop
master Ben Willis. Art cnaeograpner TJ. Rotolo..
8 p.m. Fit -Sat. througn Apnl 2 plus 2 am. March
20. Hermosa Civic Theatre. 710 Pier Avenue.
Hermosa Beach. Tadcets: S8410. information:
318-3452.
Cast: Mulder Eleanor Brandt. Graldius D.
Fo..t's. Christi's' Ball. J.ati.rd Lass. Il.e
MRfs, Tl Rstsl.. Aa.. N.l.taru. SJdrir Bissau.
OauiN1. D.sa.k Michel Simi. Wm gas&
nil Chris Oi.rsl»a
goods and thus humiliate her
former lover.
However, Valmont has an in-
trigue of his own under way. He
is working to gain the favors of
an attractive but virtuous
young married woman, Ma-
dame de Tourvel (Anne Hule-
gard, who is also producer and
artistic director).
Meanwhile. young Chevalier
Danceny (Michael Morena) se-
cretly worships Cecile from
afar, and Merteuil and Valmont
encourage him to press his suit,
as further sport.
Believe it or not, the plot gets
even more convoluted from
there.
Brandt and Enos are deli-
ciously evil in the lead roles.
Enos in particular slides effort-
lessly — and chillingly — from
charm to total ruthlessness.
Brandt was effective in her
role as scheming manipulator,
but played it a shade too sym-
pathetically. When pieces of
Merteuil's piot went awry, she
appeared to display genuin
emotion, slightly out of charas
ter for a self -described `virtuos
of deceit.'
Hulegard does an admirabi
job with an almost comic -boo
role as the unsophisticate
young matron whose virtue
under siege. She performs a di:
zying range of emotions fror
outrage to passion and, finall:
despair.
Morena is delightful as Dar
ceny, the young suitor withot
a clue. Likewise, Danielle Des
mond brings just the rigk:
amount of sluttiness to Emilir
Bonn does well with her charas
ter's innocence, but needs
larger dose of the coquette she
really supposed to be.
Tony Torrisi's directio
keeps the action moving at to
speed, despite the large numb(
of scenes and complicated dit
logue.
Possibly because the play i1
self is fairly long (more tha
two hours, not counting inter
mission), his pacing was some
times a little too quick for th
audience, losing a segment c
dialogue in the laughter from
previous line. It's a minor su
considering the more frequer
tendency of period pieces t
bog down.
There must be somebody oL_
there who's disappointed th:
the Winter Olympics coverall
has ended. For those intereste
in an entertaining evening r
mental gymnastics, "Les Lia
sons Dangereuses" won't disat
point.
I Kathryn Martin is a fref
lance writer.
4
he opportunity to view both the ence.
onglorgl Enos Is Le Vicomte De Valmont and Anne Hulegard Is La Presldente
)cTourvel In the Hermosa Civic Theater's current production of Lcs Liaison
)angcrcuscs.
)
deliciously clever, witty, elegant
and fun. The eighth scene (!) in
the second acts ends with sword
play, but the characters fence
with words throughout the pro-
duction. It is a surprisingly acces-
sible and timely piece with many
daggered bits of philosophy and
advice for women on how to
survive and prosper in what was
definitely a man's world.
Finding actors who can carry
off the play's verbal gymnastics
and repartees, look at home in
the elegant costumes and the
mannerisms of the era, and who
can also make us care about their
characters is a large order. The
three leads; Jennifer Eleanor Brant,
Ann Hulegard and Jongiorgi Enos
manage this magnificently. Brant,
as the beautiful and conniving La
i
t'D
CD
Marquis De Merteuil, leads the
audience along her twisted path L
of revenge, with such adeptness
the audience is surprised at each
new revelation. Enos, as her
handsome, vain womanizing con-
fidante (and eventual victim), I.e
Vicomte De Valmont, plays the
role with sureness and skill and
with a nice touch of period fop-
pishness. Hulegard as the lovely,
virtuous and vulnerable La Presi-
dent De 'I'ourval, gives a multi-
faceted, convincing portrayal. All
are splendid.
The secondary leads and sup-
port actors are a rich blend of
veteran community actors, in-
cluding Shirley Blurnan, who gave
an outstanding performance as
the aged Vicomte's aunt, Mme
De Rosemond; and young profes-
sionals shining their craft, such
as Christine Bonn in a many
shaded performance as the 15 -
year -old, convent reared, seduced
bed companion of the Vicomte;
and newcomer Chris Okerstrom,
who ventured on stage for the
first time.
Professionally produced by
Anne Hulegard and well directed
by George Adams and Tony
Torrisi, the play overcomes most
of the obstacles inherent with
presenting a mannered: costume
period piece, with more locales
than a travelogue.
Costuming this elegant affair,
when the French aristocracy was
noted for three and four changes
of exquisite and complicated cloth-
ing a day (for a backstage with
minuscule dressing areas and an
almost nonexistent budget) was
solved with one beautifully made
costume for each character (ex-
cept for the naughty, and some-
times bawdy bedroom scenes),
> 32
all in monochromatic off-whi
and ecru. It was very effectiv
snot her challenge was a whi•
wind of 18 scenes in eight loc
lions on a stage with no win
space on the sides or fly spa(
above to put any sets. In adc
tion, this is the only stage in tl
South Bay that does not alto
theater companies to attach se
to the stage so they can be he
up. Solutions: borrow antigt
furniture and set up a salon
drape some splattered muslin abor
and Int the audience change tI
location in their minds. Not hay
I wish they had noted the desiF
ancestry of the costumes and se
in the program.
For good theater, communi
or otherwise, Les Linisor
Danl;c'reuscs is my "best bet" fr
an inexpensive ($10), close !
bonne (corner of Pacific Con
Highway and Pier Avenue i
Hermosa Beach) fun and ente
taining evening. The show pia,
Fri., and Sat. at R p.in. throuf-
Apr. 2. A Sun. martinee will I
presented Mar. 20 at 2 p.m. Fc
ticket information call the.. Ilerrno•
Beach Community Center '31:
:; •t':.
1979 OFFICIAL GENERAL PLAN MAP AS AMENDED
HHERMOSA BEACH
Co A IL : IF 0 -7 N I A
Prepared by the Planning Department
0 30 00 300 400
SCALE
ArER it
co.
rD
rat C1
V
a
LD
LD
LD
L E G E N D
GCI
�i'I LD
lal
LD'
MI LD
LD
LQ
x
HD - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 33 du/ac
MD - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 25 d&ac
LD - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13 dufac
SPA- SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
CC - GENERAL COMMERCIAL
HERMOSA
VIEW
SCHOOL
CORONA
LD
L
PRO SPECr
HILLCREST
LD
HD
. LC CR£Sr
NC - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
CR - COMMERCIAL RECREATION
.n MHP - MOBILE HOME PARK
IND - INDUSTRIAL
ID
GC LLD
ADEN
vE
.CC
/
FIC-E-1/
''��PAcir,C
I C i
Os — OPEN SPACE
gHOOES
L D�
BARNEY Cr
i I
LD W
GC O�r, 0 W�
5i, cc ern
HIGHWAY
roa sr
LD
SPA
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES
0
COURT
Gc
HD
PACIFIC
AMENDED
LD
HD
CC
COAST
VI 14-471::1
HIGHWAY
• 5/24/87
II 301E17 -
RI
OS
GSA
VALLSy
SCHOOL
MHP
GC!
_J
/BARD
/ GC,
CIMcS 06
CENrEq I,
_' I ,nib` � IGc O5
i CLARKS�
CY PL qess AVE HD sTa DIUM
W! HD -
os_
MD
vaL
e
GC HD
y
hz
MD
MD
MD
AVE
HD
HD
MONTEREY
HD
GG
GCI [ONA
HD w
SGC Hn z
HD
MDI
MDI
51 LVER S
GNLA
AME
ro
Rt LE
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
HR Th
F IND
MD
DR M£,
HD
MD
I:
tr
HD
A
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
GC
N
HD
IM D
ANHArrA
HD
AVENUE
HERMOSA
MD I MD
HERMOSA
Gc
HD
GC
HD
AVENUE
HD
HO
MD
1-7
YRD
H�.
HD
HD
It GC GC
HD
HD
HD
PUBUC
GC
VEIT DE
HD
OS
MD 'HD
OS
STRAND
HD
HD
OS
TRARD
HD
its
HD Ho I
k•7 Jo
HD
HD
STRAND