Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01/25/94
2F 10 't _ _A W�o 1125 /49� V Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agen- da packet with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of .the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and'efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require .two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters . Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members. of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 25, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Continuation of interviews for Planning Commission Vacancy - 6:00p.m. Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. MAYOR Sam Y. Edgerton MAYOR PRO TEM Robert Benz COUNCIL MEMBERS John Bowler Julie Oakes J. R. Reviczky CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATION BY THE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the Citi Council is prohibited by law from taking immediate action on any Public Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following.more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to anprove the following minutes: (b) 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on January 11, 1994; 2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on January 11, 1994; and, 3) Minutes of the Special Meeting held on January 6, 1994. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) 'Recommendation to receive and rile Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file and December 1993 financial reports: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW AT THE MEETING OF - FEBRUARY 22, 1994) (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to receive and file the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. Memorandum from City Treasurer John Workman dated January 12, 1994. (f) Recommendation to receive and file auditor review of 1992-93 Appropriation Limit. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated January 18, 1994. (g) Recommendation that Council extend the City's contract with MultiVision from the previous extension through the end of February, 1994 to a new date of May 31, 1994. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated January 18, 1994. (h) Resolution of support for the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Proiect Memorandum from City Manager Stephen R. Burrell dated January 19, 1994 (i) Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to initiate a studv for a text amendment to the zoning ordinance to eliminate or modify required automatic referrals back to the Planning Commission, when the City Council modifies Conditional Use or other development permits, on appeal Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 18, 1994. (j) Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to initiate a text amendment to the sign ordinance to increase the allowable coverage for window signs from 20% to 50%. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 18, 1994. (k) Stinnett wells status report. Memorandum from Building & Safety Director Michael Schubach dated January 20, 1994. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 94-1102 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT PERTAINING TO WALLS AND FENCES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. (b) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH - MUNICIPAL CODE BY ESTABLISHING LOCAL CABLE CONSUMER PROTECTION STANDARDS. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated January 18, 1994. (c) RESOLUTION NO. 94- and ORDINANCE NO. 94- : - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, IN REGARDS TO OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, TO ESTABLISH NEW AND LESS RESTRICTIVE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA, AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSIONS AND CHANGES OF USE, AND THE ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PENDING APPROVAL BY THE COASTAL COMMISSION). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 18, 1994 and comments from Planning Commission regarding amended resolution and ordinance. Supplemental Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 20, 1994. For re -adoption of resolution and waiver of full reading and introduction of ordinance. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S TWO SPECIFIC CONDITIONS TO AN AMORTIZED C.U.P. TO AN ADULT THEATRE AND BOOKSTORE AT 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, THE TENDER BOX. (Continued from Council Meeting of December 14, 1993) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 18, 1994. 5. 3rd QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT REVISIONS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 19, 1994. (CONTINUED FROM COUNCIL 'MEETINGS OF 10/12/93, 10/26/93, 11/9/93 & 11/23/93) MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE - PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO CREATE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICTS FOR PROJECTS ON PIER AVENUE, PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, AND BEACH DRIVE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 12, 1994. 4 7. BILTMORE PARK ALTERNATIVES CIP 92-523: TO APPROVE CONCEPTUAL PLAN, APPROVE APPROPRIATION OF $6,000 FROM BILTMORE PARK PROJECT TO OBTAIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, AND APPROVE EXPENDITURE OF APPROXIMATELY $60,000 FROM THE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 92-408) FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THAT PORTION OF SEWER WHICH EXTENDS THROUGH THE PARK SITE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 18, 1994. 8. SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CIP 92-501: DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO OBTAIN ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO DESIGN SOUTH SCHOOL PARK AND ALLOCATE $20,000.00 FROM SOUTH SCHOOL PARK PROJECT TO PAY FOR ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT SERVICES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 18, 1994. 9. REQUEST FROM REDONDO BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO WAIVE THE $1,317.75 FEE FOR FILMING THE REDONDO BEACH SUPER BOWL SUNDAY 10K RUN/5K WALK. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen R. Burrell dated January 20, 1994. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Approval by Chamber of Commerce for funding of LA ONLINE computer access services. (b) Change Council meeting start time from 7:00pm to 7:30pm. (c) Update on joint chamber/council meeting. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 1a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Appointment to Planning Commission One unexpired term ending June 30, 1996 Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 13, 1994 (b) School District/City Council/Planning Commission Annual Joint Meeting. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 18, 1994 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. (a) Request by Council member Benz for consideration of moving requirements of a Conditional Use Permit for all businesses allowed in the C-1 through C-3 zones. Those uses which require a C.U.P. should be eliminated from the allowable use list. (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 14, 1993 AND JANUARY 11, 1994 MEETINGS) (b) Request by Council member Benz for consideration of bringing City Attorney services in-house. The City of Manhattan Beach recently proposed this due, in part, to a study by the Anderson Group. The analysis indicated that the city could realize up to a 40% savings in attorney costs. (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 14, 1993 AND JANUARY 11, 1994 MEETINGS) Supplemental memorandum from City Manager Stephen R. Burrell dated January 19, 1994. (c) Request by Council member Oakes for consideration of a resolution of intent to direct staff to study enforcement of seismic upgrading. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. CLOSED SESSION, if necessary, for purpose of Personnel Matters, Meet and Confer, Real Estate Negotiations, or Pending Litigation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). W ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF SAVO STOSHITCH, ARCHITECT OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL AND POLICE HEADQUARTERS AND THE HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY. 6 G Ifs Ufl u fng Effort �o Ensure Grund wa der Quaky o 0 In the past, improper disposal practices of industrial solvents allowed volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to seep into the groundwater. As a result, some wells in the Water Replenishment District (WRD) were affected and taken out of drinking water production. Stricter regulations have greatly reduced the source of this contamination, but we are left with the problem of removing the existing contamination from the groundwater. WRD has established a Wellhead Treatment Program to address this issue. The first WRD wellhead treatment facility began operation in 1991. ���t IS 7 tie Wt-�llt�r��j��j The program is designed to help groundwater pumpers remove VOCs— allowing an affected well to meet public drinking water standards set by regulatory agencies. V^".,y ;s I tai , Frc••�r�r�i It encourages pumpers to re-openwells taken out of domestic use because of contamination. This increases groundwater pumping capacity and reduces dependence on scarce and expensive imported water supplies. In addition, the removal of VOCs from the groundwater supply helps prevent the contaminants from spreading to other areas. I��.>>rr Dues Thi �"rr�gr�3m Werk? WRD's Wellhead Treatment Program works in two ways: 1) The District will provide financing to a pumper for necessary treatment equipment. This funding comes from the Clean Water Fund, or... 2) The District will buy the necessary wellhead treatment equipment and the pumper pays for operation and maintenance costs. As part of the District's Clean Water Programs, the Wellhead Treatment Program encourages the clean-up of our groundwater supply. By cleaning up our groundwater supply of Southern Los Angeles County, we move one step closer to reaching the goal of ensuring groundwater quality through effective and conscientious groundwater management. What Are The Advantages '� ^ flow Does This Program Of The Program? Q Relate To The VOO Remoova� Program Removing and eliminating the spread IE Water processed in the Wellhead of contaminants reduces the risk of further Treatment Program may also qualify contamination. forWRD's volatile organic compound o' (VOC) Removal Rebate Program. Increasing groundwater pumping The program is designed to capacity allows more water to be pumped encourage the removal of VOCs from locally currently operational wellsto improve water quality. By encouraging the pumping of wells containing VOCs, Providing low interest loans and the contaminants are removed from varying repayment terms minimizes net : Q the basins thereby eliminating the treatment costs to the pumper. threat of further spreading. How Do n Find Out Furnishing the necessary treatment More information About equipment eliminates the need for pumpers , The Pro -gram? to provide the capital costs.' For more information on this program or any of the Clean Water Programs, Reducing the dependence on scarce contact the Water Replenishment and expensive imported water allows Q . District. Southern California to become water independent. WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Moving the treatment equipment to other locations as needed makes the program Q cost effective. 12621 E. 166th Street Cerritos, California 90701 (310) 921-5521 �roc�nc•�v��:� t�f F�r State health authorities. Another source of replenishment water is storm water runoff. Runoff is diverted from the adjacent Rio Hondo and San Gabriel Rivers into the spreading grounds. Upstream dams capture additional runoff and snow melt for later spreading. Halting Sea Matsu• lntr asion Dry wells v�ere not the only symptom of the drastic decline of the water table levels in the late 1950's. In the West Coast Groundwater Basin, groundwater levels dropped below sea level allowing salt water to seep into the basin. This caused salt water contamination in wells and a significant loss of groundwater storage capacity. 9�AVATERFE RRSEB JUECT1_CW VELFL (UGMAN `'_> AGIUIFER �- NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD FAULT WEST COAST BASIN CENTRAL BASIN To deter the flow of saline water into the groundwater basins, three sea water intrusion barriers were constructed. Each barrier consists of a line of closely -spaced injection wells. Water is injected through these wells to form a barrier of fresh water between the ocean and the groundwater basin. -Barrier water is also the major source of replenish- ment for the West Coast Groundwater Basin. t Groundwater Quality WIRD is dedicated to the protection and enhancement of ground- water quality in the Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins. Area groundwater is threatened by Volatile Organic Compound (VO(f) contamination from the San Gabriel Valley through the Whittier ! Narrows, as well as from isolated areas of existing local contamination. In addition, entrapped saline water endangers the West Coast basin groundwater. WRD has established a series of Clean Water Programs to safeguard groundwater quality. These programs foster removal of contaminants, and prevent pollution to the groundwater. The District also conducts extensive water quality monitoring programs. Environmental Consciousness Recycled water, like the recycled paper in this brochure, is environ- mentally friendly. WRD is currently the largest regulated user of re- cycled water in California. By maximizing the use, of recycled water and storm water runoff, the District conserves local Southern California resources otherwise lost to the ocean. This also reduces our need for water imported from the Colorado and Sacramento Rivers, decreasing the environmental impact on these ecologically sensitive river systems. - Looking to the Future �n our semi -arid region of rapidly increasing population, Southern ' California's prosperity depends on reliable water supplies. The Water Replenishment District is actively developing local water resources to replace scarce and costly imported water. Our goal is to drought - proof the Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins and provide a safe, clean and reliable supply of groundwater now and for future generations. District formation: December 9, 1959 Service region: Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins in Southern Los Angeles County Service area: 420 square miles Population in service area: 3.5 million Cities served: 43 Average annual groundwater demand in service area: 250,000 acre,feet Average annual recycled water use: 50,000 acre feet Average annual storm water use: 40,000 acre feet (An acre-foot of water is the amount of water used by two typical households in a year.) r Groundwater Rep�enushment Uhe Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins are artificially replen- ished by spreading and injecting replacement water. These replenish- ment operations are a joint effort of WRD and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. Natural underground flow of groundwater from adjacent basins supplements artificial replenishment. Replenishment by spreading is accomplished by diverting water into large holding ponds at the Rio Hondo and the San Gabriel River Spread- ing Grounds located in Montebello and Pico Rivera. This water seeps A h d own into t e group - water aquifers and replenishes the Central Groundwater Basin. A portion of this water also crosses the New- port -Inglewood fault and partially replenishes the West Coast Ground- water Basin. Three sources of water are utilized for replen- 10 Santa Monica Freeway 60 Los Angeles Pomona Freeway Montebello . . 605 t0 - San Gabriel Harbor FreewayRiver Freeway South Gate Hawthorne Downey 5 0 0 710 nla na Freeway Long Beach Freeway C3 Cerrito, C3 a05 g, Sanv Diego Freeway Arleaia Freeway p caraon 0,orrance a 0 O Wilmington O q OLong Beach O O Pela, Verde. Ism ishment at the spreading . grounds. WRD purchases water originating in Northern California and the Colorado River from the Metropolitan Water District. Highly treated recycled water, purchased from the Los Angeles. County Sanitation t l Districts, is also used for spreading. To assure the highest standards of public health, the quality of this recycled water is closely monitored by Water Replenishment District CeTUES SERVED BY WRD of Southern California 0 Artesia Long Beach "he Water Replenishment District of Southern California Bell Los Angeles, (WRD) provides groundwater for 3.5 million residents in R Bell Gardens Lynwood 43 cities of southern Los Angeles County. Bellflower Manhattan Beach Carson Maywood Cerritos Montebello Prior to the formation of the District in 1959, over -pumping caused City of Commerce Monterey Park many water wells to go dry and sea water intrusion to contaminate Compton Norwalk coastal groundwater. WRb protects the basins through groundwater Cudahy Palos Verdes Estates replenishment, deterrence of sea water intrusion, and groundwater r - Downey Paramount contamination prevention and clean-up programs. WRD operations are EI Segundo Pico Rivera financed through assessments on groundwater pumped from the I Gardena Rancho Palos Verdes District service area - the Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins. Hawaiian Gardens Redondo Beach Hawthorne Rolling Hills Hermosa Beach Rolling Hills Estates - Huntington Park Santa Fe Springs GroundwaterUPU��®��1111)�� _ Inglewood Signal Hill (aroundwater.is an important source of water in southern Los Angeles La Habra Heights South Gate La Mirada Torrance County, providing approximately 40% of the total demand. Ground- Lakewood Vernon, water reserves also provide an emergency supply of water during - Lawndale Whittier droughts and natural disasters that disrupt normal water deliveries. Lomita Groundwater is formed as -surface water seeps down through the ground into aquifers. These aquifers are natural underground forma- tions, such as sand and gravel, which serve as subterranean water reservoirs. A series of aquifers in a specific area comprise a basin. Water is pumped from groundwater basins through wells drilled into the aquifers. I •y - _ I < 1 Water Replenishment District of Southern California WRD Board of Directors Dr. Kenneth Orduna, Vice President • First Division Robert Goldsworthy, Secretary • Second -Division Dan Glasgow, President • Third Division Clarence Wong, Treasurer • Fourth Division Albert Robles, Director • Fifth Division General Manager John Norman 12621 E. 166th Street o Cerritos, CA 90701 o (310) 921-5521 i Managing Groundwater For Today and the Future . i Many age„nyc�„� have a role in provid- ingyour water. Water Replenish � � ent District is the basin - wide agenty that + � anages ou+r water quality a+nd water supply on a regional level. The DD istrict carr�ies out co � � ple�x technic -al activities and projects. All acre ani � ed apt a goal tfiat is clear and si � � p1e: guaran-tee an ample supply o f clean groimd- wate-r for the 3.5 miQlrion people - and the parks, busi,n�sse-s and indars- trie-s - o f soutl�e-n� Los Ange--les County. An Ample Supply of Groundwater For 3.5 Million People Here area few of the Water Replenishment Water Replenishment District purchases and stores water underground to use when District programs that protect the basins from needed. The District is so success firl that after five years of the worst drought in recent outside threats. c3 California history, the water level in the basins actually increased. Seawater Barriers. In coastal areas, closely Traditional Water Supply Sources. The District offers incentives that encour- spaced wells inject fresh water into the ground. age water agencies to purchase and use imported water in the winter when it is This action forms an effective barrier against available and cheap. This saves the less expensive groundwater for use in the sea water which decades ago began to intrude summer when demand peaks. into the groundwater basins. Reclaimed Water. Water Replenishment District is the largest regulated user of Contamination From Outside. Pollutants recycled wastewater in the State. At $11 an acre foot (the amount of water two from the San Gabriel Basin, north of our households use in a year), it is far less expensive than imported water which costs IJ service area, threaten to migrate southward. rko $250 to $400 an acre foot. Recycled wastewater is safe and reliable making southern Jil Water Replenishment District and 14 cities jj�"Los Angeles County more self sufficient. formed a coalition which is working to contain the pollutants. Landfills, Leaking Tanks, Pesticides. -- -- - The District is searching out every abandoned ®► ���,, landfill, leaking tank and hazardous waste site to reduce its danger to the groundwater. Where possible, responsible parties will be � � CENTT RAL" GROLIN' DWATE R BASXN ' • made to clean up their contaminants. WF0l �+ c r u, mmmmm ` �il`af111tOS ' WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT r r,. a•x _. Barrier OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA West Coast. Basin UVEST COAST GROUNDWATER BASIN fffBarner Protect �, ,,:...;�,..,.-=�,. r ^`�`-=-�' • '� ` _ + ,,;. „ ,. Pig n it ., • y :,,II, ' : t s'I . ( it •"� i : h W ?� �,� .'G+. (I': I`:.' a•iI4.. I� tl.i�iP it ?:�Iti C+ll GC7i ��,. ,!Gr I,u:,i ..•mss.•,... �.. � Dominguez ,+ •'• �+,.�• • � � +�,+,. � +, .;;.,,, Gap*Barner��! ,: , •� !„••, �t, �� � Project`''' Il41"'. ., - ASSURE QUALITY OF THE BASINS • V San Pedro Bay • ,. The District has an intensive water quality Santa Monka Bay monitoring program thatgathers health and quality r �. ...!+ ”' _ �� -� ,•�:+' l.+ IIFi - �! + +I ! a i � information from the basin and publishes the results of thousands of water quality tests in theAnnual Report on the Results of Waterua fty MonitorhN. A goal of the district is a contamination- free Basin. Here are a few clean-up programs Research. The District conducts health that remove contaminants from the water. research into quality issues to assure the safety Rebate Program and Wellhead Treatment Program. Industrial solvents called and health of residents. Volatile Organic Compounds years ago were carelessly dumped onto the ground, Monitoring Wells. The district has in place affecting the water. Water Replenishment District offers rebates, financing, technical monitoring wells to gather water samples for help, and even entire facilities, to help clean up our basins. testing. These are in addition to the thousands Desalting Demonstration Project. The District is participating in a desalting of tests done by other basin water suppliers. demonstration, and is exploring other innovative techniques to clean up saltwater Together, this adds up to an invaluable water that entered the basin decades ago, contaminating coastal groundwater. quality data resource. This is just one part of WRD`s co prehensive Clean Water Program designed to eventuality rid the Basin of conga � � inants and protect owr under- ground treasure for future generations. ams3 n7[AGQ0i:16 VQMC3 QUP23V0@) H�3o MS3a U93 Water. Quality Water Supply Water Institutions and more ... WAFER REPLENISHMENT UISFRICT OF SOUTHERN C-ALIFORNIA 12621 EAST 166TH STREET C•ERRIT03, CA 9U7o1 (r31 ", 921.3421 Preserving the Treasure Beneath Your Feet About half of the water used by 3.5 million people in the 43 cities of southern Los Angeles County is stored underground. It is found in natural formations called aquifers, made of soil, sand and gravel saturated with water. Series of aquifers linked together form the two great groundwater basins — the Central Groundwater Basin and the West Coast Groundwater Basin — that supply much of the water in our area. Many challenges threaten the quality and quantity of this precious resource: = Contamination from inside and outside the basin D Tough and costly water quality standards 0 Sea water intrusion 0 Limited water supply Water Replenishment Sprinklers running, industry using water, showers, faucets, washing machines Billions of gallons of water are being used. Where does it all come from? From Under Your Feet District o f Southern California — your groundwa- ter manager — is meeting these challenges while protecting and improving the ground- water for you and your children. Future editions of Ground Water will answer many of the questions you have about your water supply. This first edition gives an overview of how the district assures that you have an ample supply of healthful water. o O Wellhead Treatment - Cleaning Up the Groundwater RD Water Replenishment District's ultimate goal is contamination free groundwater. One of the °� r� ,„----- � •,� �,, �, most difficult clean-up obstacles is a class of "_ r, 4 ,tib.., .-�"�I o p p o 12 N rau 0 o a industrial solvents called Volatile �' i Q a o d 4 a n a 4 Q a Organic Compounds (VOC`s) i which are harmful even in tiny NNW concentrations. A Because clean-up of VOCs is `. too expensive for many local cities ` ,,, t and water agencies, WRD offers a Wellhead TreatrnerrtProgran"r which provides them< with financial assistance and even entire treat- ment facilities (costing up to $500,000 each). This $8 million program is designed to clean up 19 key wells between now and 1998. WRD treatment plants under construction will be p� capable of cleaning as much as a billion gallons of water each year. Reaching Out to the Community Mnlc� Southern To learn look for California is supported by one more: our new water of the largest, most complex water systems information displays to be installed in in the world. Because customers are con- local libraries; call for a speaker for your cerned and interested, Water Replenish- organization; watch for upcoming issues of 6�a�Qaa aQaa6Q[3 ment District is redoubling its efforts to Ground Water, or call the District for more answer your questions about water. information. w" Q ° l 0 ° � ° � o off} ° h Out �a�n�dMailthe; + Enclo ed Post Card' tay informed about What is being done to assure you of an abundant, healthful. G1 P NJ D 6 0 ¢ �aano¢a op supply of water. Future issues of this newsletter will be sent to you at no charge. 4 b W M 4 Q L'3 i:. ;. .. laap19Ma9 M NLeD9V Preserving the Treasure Beneath Your Feet About half of the water used by 3.5 million people in the 43 cities of southern Los Angeles County is stored underground. It is found in natural formations called aquifers, made of soil, sand and gravel saturated with water. Series of aquifers linked together form the two great groundwater basins — the Central Groundwater Basin and the West Coast Groundwater Basin — that supply much of the water in our area. Many challenges threaten the quality and quantity of this precious resource: = Contamination from inside and outside the basin D Tough and costly water quality standards 0 Sea water intrusion 0 Limited water supply Water Replenishment Sprinklers running, industry using water, showers, faucets, washing machines Billions of gallons of water are being used. Where does it all come from? From Under Your Feet District o f Southern California — your groundwa- ter manager — is meeting these challenges while protecting and improving the ground- water for you and your children. Future editions of Ground Water will answer many of the questions you have about your water supply. This first edition gives an overview of how the district assures that you have an ample supply of healthful water. Marina db ••\ Playa del Rey •„•, '"^ \\.11, 9 z V• D \ m EI Segundo n o z n Mo halt Bea h ' Gardena s O WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT \ J - •" "° ” 91100 ao Hermosa Bea .c fj. <q YR'6i h, .E w, Torrance Redondo Be _ s =': Carson PolosverdesE t r r.� ,Ty. .Lomita DOMINGUEZ GAP BARRIER PROJECT Wilmington — N — PALOS VE.ROES •nrro•' yv NrLL �� jY ..o✓ s O C% i F •4 41 Ns eoch 4 E OR0 aABY _ 5 4 R Cerritos District ffice ♦ 1 ALAMITOS BARRIER AM PROJECT WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BOOKMAN—EDMONSTONENGINEERING, INC. GLENDALE,CAL I FORNIA SCALE 01 "'LES 4 rf cos .rE 9 Vernon ANGELES '� P 1 Montebello RIO HONDO SPREADING SS / w f\as, •"r Huntington GROUNDS V FOR E B AY Park (!;� Whittier < �• °O a\sso SAN GABRIEL RIVER" 4q of I SPREADING GROUNDS e� fg S°Rf�4 S uth Gate MONTEBEL[O p? FOREBAY f i 4RE4 \ Santa Fe SPr Inge 9 9 Is. i WN/TT/ER �SSr'q � Down\ e,"A �f of a Lynwood /%�• W44° Norwalk Ns eoch 4 E OR0 aABY _ 5 4 R Cerritos District ffice ♦ 1 ALAMITOS BARRIER AM PROJECT WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BOOKMAN—EDMONSTONENGINEERING, INC. GLENDALE,CAL I FORNIA SCALE 01 "'LES T V 0 0 0 0 C :BLVD BROADWAY _ \ Y\�' ? 3 wJ ,. FREEWAY S QlA Beverly 0 O F REfWgy > / 2V a 11;c\o _C Ja: py N Y�i4Y Be West Covina S t`9 'A WILSNIR BLVD. 50 VA( A ,3��' VY5 CEY c\``WOHII��` Monterey SAN ���TTT p BLVD Ila IU ST. \ilv= Park q0' SAN BEpMp nt p,1.S�>�YIRI"1i f1111i111!////Vry0 4 s R"" --" Ec W�.J p I. BASED ON RESOLUTION NO.91-439 OF ; - }'JIII cpwvET will\ /i i� 3p A ,ry/ VENICE BLVD. Las Y`N,C _ wfsewvO,h AO"O'SN JER 4pWW O' / _ St'p �0 J`. / MONICA Angeles N 41.I1u/il/ c Santa yp+p Monica SANTA FREEWAY gfEWgF Wry/rF'EN POM ...� N `w MON1Cp '� BLVD. �� uUAuI V�IVI• fp 1\Iltll"11111 IIII IIII' OSS ' v a .'3 Lo Puente S(h °° VP�CAl Ite �/ij//% 4 m 1 4"a p\�p p \�aV.V, °o( y B H'M,TT,fR \`OD , \\\\ G , BLV ,p ,/ = v ' /2 (O 11 x a Commerce Montebello ////,E 0 wOMO a Vernonryq eAsser F m LaMlrada 9ElSegundo F0UTHERNCALIFORNIA WAS FORMERLY N.H OF 0 F APL 9 VERNON V 0.O^ ��//CANYON FREE IIIIIp WAY Ven' DP �`q�E AVE. TYa UDSFN pYi II.\J111p`O` eo I�II /nY� /IIIIIIDINIII I BNf`fVN ° a N� '•'il� 3S Huntington CITMYAYw00D Park Pico N / ROSECRANS I ; u3, t3f OLISiLYA COMMERC vera Whittle $ Marina e 4Af�fs f 9 Bell Bell M1Vu, Compton O ° Cudahy Gardens k X51"\tl` f�Uy MANCHESTER ..FY,Fs 9 W Inglewood BLVD. South Sth Gate AVE. \e STONE FIRE Santa Fe R Jou I,nInN,II NY*' y,lJ\ ego s FIRST DIVISION Manhattan 8each Springs Co. Gardena Vo R OF OF PARAMOUNT OF RD. CO. J 10 e oORANGE 1 Downey ggFE Office - °DF I PT H D I V°1 S I O N NOTES T V IMPERIAL HIGHWAY NORWALN Ila IU ST. Lynwood 3 I. BASED ON RESOLUTION NO.91-439 OF \ CITT OF LDS ANEELEE _ ryTF i� O BOARD OF DIRECTORS RELOCATING Hawthorne _ v a BOUNDARY LINES OF DISTRICT DIVISIONS W MVIRNIO FOURTH DIVISION W IMPERIAL ON DECEMBER 19,1991.EL 2. THE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT x a Norwalk LaMlrada 9ElSegundo F0UTHERNCALIFORNIA WAS FORMERLY - e KNOWN AS CENTRAL AND WEST BASIN R S flANS \ _ AVE. ROSECRANS AVE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT. Compton O ° o qEE MARINE AVE. \e Paramount e m V} Manhattan 8each Gardena R OF OF PARAMOUNT OF e - Bellflower Cerritos District J OND 6[AOX ggFE Office ..: _ J\IIIIIIIIIIII%11111 HIII//,...N CITY IA aRT ESIa FREE WqO ARTESIA y , BLVD. sq"14, t -T' -*114, 00 BEACH FREEWAY it "'COD' M/ -V Artesia Hermosa Beach\ FREE Wpy 1901C 1 SECOND DIVISION "°\ ,,,p\ ""44 ' Lakewood µ � DEL BLVD. �< � y /� o clrr a LANEw00D CD ' Redondo Beach RR°Nc BLVD. -=Carson Torrance CARSON ST. SEPULVEDA x ; BCVD ,AIFIN1UfHrI/ gCYF 3 ► /C %YlI/4 of Palos Verdes Est ssT �„ ° U Lomita CITY 6— of wE �14Ry/'/ °vSt CITY LDS (FjH/ HIGHWAY PACIFIC " wow Wilmington ® .�..f ••B • sT. —CS vewaes a - P A L 0 S E R wfsfwvD,w a Q jj OESw, V H O u � wNLENT TMDMAA PaL09 VEgOfS vii E I E / =San °9A Pedro SOUTH h/ v 0 3 N \A 0_ DI a CARSON ST. HIRD DIVIS ION LEGEND O _ BOUNDARY OF WATER REPLENISHMENT J1)ISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. AN / U BOUNDARY OF DIRECTORS DIVISIONSASEE NOTE ND,I) J JNV TTN AN pV Long each ?E DRO BAY SPN �C� Q2 ���YI-f✓ WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 'n 111111111\` LOCATION OF DIRECTORS DIVISIONS BOOKMAN-EDMONSTON ENGINEERING, INC. GLENDALE . CALIFORNIA APRIL 1992 SCALE OF MILES 1 0 2 3 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, January 11, 1994, at the hour of 6:10 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - John Workman, City Treasurer ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Bowler, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton Absent: Oakes (arrived at 6:12 P.M.) INTERVIEWS OF APPLICANTS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCY It was the consensus of the City Council that the large number of applicants seeking appointment to the Planning Commission, coupled with the brief amount of interviewing time available this evening, created the need for a second interview process, which would be further discussed later when the scheduled item came up on the regular meeting agenda. Mayor Edgerton then directed, with the consensus of Council, that each applicant come forward when called, in alphabetical order, and be given the opportunity to present a brief statement focusing on why each thinks that he or she is the most qualified candidate to fill the vacant seat on the Planning Commission. City Clerk Doerfling noted that Commission applicant Diane L. Lickar had requested that her application be withdrawn from consideration. Coming forward to make their presentations were the following applicants: 1) Roger Carlson 2) Steven A. Crecy 3) Alan M. Dettelbach 4) Dennis Neil Jones 5) Jeanette S. Jones 6) Brian C. Koch 7) Annie Moler 8) Darrell S. Rockefeller 9) Peter C. Tucker Commission applicant Bill Sigler was not present at the interviews. Action: That later this.evening, during Council consideration of the scheduled item on the regular meeting agenda (Item ll.a. - Appointment to Planning Commission), the City Council would: 1) narrow the field of applicants down to five, with each Council member selecting one applicant believed to be the most qualified; and 2) schedule a second, more in-depth interview for those five applicants. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8386 ' CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, January 11, 1994, at the hour of 6:45 P.M., to the Regular Meeting of the same date, scheduled to begin at the hour of 7:00 P.M. ' i , ,�• ity &4' City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8387 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on January 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:07 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - John Workman, City Treasurer ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Edgerton thanked the public for its support and donation of toys over the Christmas Holidays. PRESENTATIONS - PRESENTATION OF GTE CALIFORNIA'S 1993 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT BY GTE DISTRICT MANAGER, KEVIN PETERSON, TO "VISION HERMOSA" - Kevin Peterson, GTE District Manager, con- gratulated the City of Hermosa Beach on being one of only two cities in California to receive this grant for the second year. Mr. Peterson said that they were impressed by the community's involvement with and commitment to R/UDAT and wanted to help in the hiring of a professional to go on to the next steps. He then presented Gary Wayland, of Vision Hermosa, with a check for $10,000. Gary Wayland accepted the check, thanked GTE for the grant money to help implement. the R/UDAT study and gave a brief history of the R/UDAT activities. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, expressed concern regarding Councilmember Benz' appoint- ment to the "Coalition for Drug Free Youth" due to his written statements regarding drugs; Terry Tamminen - Santa Monica BayKeeper, spoke regarding the oil leak at the Stinnett well; displayed photos and presented crude oil sam- ples taken from the site; said oil could wash into the ocean from the storm drain located 100 feet from the site; urged the City to take ac- r tion to have the well capped; Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, said the well was an attractive nuisance and had no fence on the west side, allowing children to gain entrance; _ questioned why there had been no C.U.P. re- quired for the Stinnett well; asked the City to apply the Oil Code, a C.U.P., and an abandoned use to force compliance from Stinnett; _ Warren Barr - Chamber of Commerce President., thanked Gary Wayland for writing the grant pro- posal that secured the grant from GTE; said the Chamber was interested in having the citizens City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8388 complete a survey detailing businesses that they would like to have come to Hermosa Beach; said survey forms were available in the Council Chamber Foyer or at the Chamber of Commerce office; suggested that in regard to item 12(a) that the City might be interested in re- instituting the Business License Simplification Task Force to address the issue of C.U.P.s and return to a joint Council/Chamber meeting for a review of the whole business license issue; and, Ken Marks - 223 Valley Drive, thanked the City for its quick work in cleaning up the oil leakage at the Stinnett well following his complaint. City Attorney Vose said the City has been in litigation with the Stinnett, oil Company trying to force com- pliance; said it would expose the City to a greater liability if it took control of the site; and it was very complicated and expensive to try to cap an aban- doned well. Planning Director Schubach spoke of the City's attempts to have the well capped; said the well had been in operation long before C.U.P.s were required. Action: To agendize this matter for the Regular Meeting of January 25, 1994. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Reviczky. So ordered. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1) Letter from Rosamond d'Orlaque Fogg dated December 16, 1993, regarding Macpherson Alternate Drill Site Study. Supplemental letter from Donald R. Macpher- son dated January 7, 1994. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Rosamond d'Orlacgue Fogg - 610 Sixth Street, spoke to her letters (items bl and b2); read from Macpherson's letter of February 27, 1990; (1) questioned the estimated costs, revenues and other figures; asked that the City reconsider and investigate the feasibility of the project; (2) said there was an error in the administra- tive record, given to the State Lands Commis- sion, that claimed the nearest residential _ property to the Macpherson Oil project was 500 yards; asked that this be corrected; and, (3) spoke to the Stinnett.Oil well leak. City Attorney Vose responded to Ms. Fogg and to Council questions. - City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8389 - Action: To receive and file Motion Benz, second Reviczky.. So ordered. 2) Letter from Rosamond d'Orlaque Fogg dated December 16, 1993, regarding Hermosa Beach Stop oil vs. Site Study. Action: To direct the City Attorney to correct the al- leged error on the Administrative Record regarding the distance of residential property from the oil project with the State Lands Commission. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried unanimously. 3) Memorandum from the Planning Commission dated January 5, 1994, concerning Environmental Concerns regarding the Stinnett Oil Wells and the City Yard. (Action on this item was covered during Oral communica- tions, item a.) Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz, second Reviczky. So ordered. 4) Memorandum from the Planning Commission dated De- cember 7, 1993, regarding events at Clark Stadium and other public facilities. Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz, second Reviczky. So ordered. At 7:53 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearing, item 4. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (j), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity; (d) Benz, and (j) Oakes. Motion Benz, second Reviczky. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 14, _ 1993: and, 2) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Decem- ber 20, 1993. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular .-Meeting of December 14, 1993 and the Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 20, 1993 as presented. City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8390 (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY DEMANDS AND WARRANTS Nos. 46037 through 46175 inclusive and Nos. 46177 through 46241 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 46039, 46040, 46066, 46098, 46099, 46100, 46110, 46121, 46153, 46154, 46179, and 46180. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE NOVEMBER, 1993, FINANCIAL REPORTS. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to questions regarding the drop in sales tax revenue and business licenses. Finance Director Copeland responded to Council ques- tions. Action: To receive and file the November, 1993: 1) Revenue and Expenditure report; and, 2) City Treasurer's report. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. So ordered. At 10:24 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to municipal matters, item 7. (e) REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF TWO COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS. Memorandum from Person- nel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 4, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the request for a 30 day extension of the appointment of two General Service Officers. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIMS Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the following claims and refer them to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: _ 1) Claimant: Mansen, Joseph Date of Loss: 06-14-93 2) Claimant Burford, Vicki Date of loss: 06-15-93 3) Claimant: Dowell, Robert Date of loss: 11-01-93 City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8391 - (g) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM ON STATUS OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH NEW PARKING REQUIRE- MENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSIONS AND CHANGE OF USE. Memo- randum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 4, 1994. Action: To receive and file the memorandum on the sta- tus of Ordinance No. 94-1099. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO WAIVE PARKING FEES AND TIME LIMITS FOR METERS ALONG PIER AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE DURING THE SAND AND STRAND RUN ON SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1994. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 3, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to waive the parking fees and time limits for meters along Pier Avenue (from Manhattan Avenue to the Pier head) and on Hermosa Avenue (from 8th Street to 16th Street) during the "Sand and Strand Run" on Sunday, February 6, 1994, from the hours of 7:00 A.M. until noon. RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HOPE CHAPEL FOR ROOM 13 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 3, 1994. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the one year lease between the City and Hope Chapel for Room 13 in the Community Center at a rate of $1,120 per month (1,288 sq.ft. X $.87 per sq.ft.) from February 1, 1994 through June 30, 1994, and $1,159 per month (1,288 sq.ft. X $.90 per sq.ft.) from July 1, 1994 through January 31, 1995, for a total rental income of $13,718; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the lease. (j) RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF PHASE I PLANS FOR THE WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (WBMWD) RECLAIMED WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 4, 1994. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Oakes for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Amirani responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Steve Tedesco - A.S.L. Consulting Engineers, City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8392 Consultant for WBMWD, said the project was fun- ded by WBMWD; said the project was being com- pleted in phases through Hermosa Beach, start- ing at the southern boundary and proceeding northward, with one section of the Greenbelt dug up, pipe laid, refilled and cleaned up be- fore another section was started, so there would be as little disruption of use as pos- sible; that only the equipment for the work being done the next day would be stored on the site; and the total estimated time for the en- tire project in Hermosa Beach would be from the early part of March until the end of April. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the Phase I Plans for. the West Basin Municipal Water District (WBMWD) reclaimed water distribution system, which, in Hermosa Beach, would run a submerged 12 inch pipe along the Greenbelt to carry non -potable reclaimed water for injection wells and park and landscape irriga- tion, with the understanding that staff would investi- gate if any other utility lines could be laid at the same time in the same trench. Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. So ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 94-1101, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.", for adop- tion. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 4, 1994. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 94-1101. Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 94-1100, It AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE OF THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND _ OTHER OUTDOOR AREAS FOR MERCHANDISE DISPLAY AND OUTDOOR DINING FOR SIDEWALK SALES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. 11f for adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doer - fling dated January 4, 1994. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 94-1100. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. So ordered. (c) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOR- NIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY 'City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8393 ESTABLISHING LOCAL CABLE CONSUMER PROTECTION STAN- DARDS, for introduction and waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 29, 1993. Community Resource Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attor- ney Vose also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Emily Brubaker - C.S.G., Inc., consultants for the Cable Television Advisory Board, gave a brief overview of the Federal regulations and said that cities were allowed to set regulations more restrictive than the Federal standards; said this Ordinance was based on one developed by the City of Lakewood, which was considered a model Ordinance; Don Granger - Regional Director for MultiVision Cable TV, spoke of his company's concerns regarding the consumer protection Ordinance; said Hermosa Beach averaged 150 service calls per month; agreed to meet with the Cable Ad- visory Board representatives and consultants and to provide financial information on those items which MultiVision felt would have a di- rect financial impact on the company; and, Rick Learned - Cable Television Advisory Board mem- ber, said the Board's next meeting was Monday, January 17, 1994; said the Board would like direction from the Council regarding the Con- sumer Protection Ordinance. The following direction was provided to the Cable Tele- vision Advisory Board through "Straw Votes's of the Council: 1) in favor of a Consumer Protection Ordinance (Benz voted no); 2) preferred the use of one universal term, "Cable Franchisee", for clarity; 3) to not accept the "No Vote Review" provision requested by MultiVision; and, 4) to request that MultiVision provide financial information to the Cable Television Advisory Board prior to Monday on which items they feel have a direct financial impact on the company. Action: To request that the prospective franchisee (MultiVision) meet with the appropriate consultants and representatives of the Cable Television Advisory Board on Monday, January 17, 1994 to review the Consumer Pro- tection Ordinance and to come back with a possibly re- vised Ordinance for the Regular Meeting of the City Council on January 25, 1994. City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8394 - Motion Bowler, second Mayor Edgerton. The motion car- ried unanimously. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(d) and (i) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calen- dar are shown under the appropriate items. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING WALLS AND FENCES, AND ELIMINATION OF THE PROHIBITION OF UNFINISHED GRAY BLOCK WALLS, 'AND ADOPTION, OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 3, 1994. _ Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:55 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Don Kain - 1947 Valley Drive, said he had been following this issue for the past two years; asked that the Council please consider allowing five foot walls for side yards on corner lots to allow the residents safety and some privacy; and, Pete Tucker - 235 34st Street, said that sealing plain cinder blocks, by paint or stucco, will cause the surface to peel, chip and blister with time and then look far more unsightly; questioned how the City would deal with that problem; said the more decorative blocks were very expensive. The public hearing closed at 8:02 P.M. Proposed Action: To approve staff alternative no. 1: to introduce the Ordinance, as proposed by the City Council without any prohibition on the type of wall, including chain link fences. Motion Benz. The motion died due to the lack of a second. _ Action: To approve the Planning Commission recommenda- tion: to introduce Ordinance No. 94-1102, as modified upon Planning Commission review to include provisions to - prohibit plain untreated block walls "not designed or manufactured to be exposed". Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Bowler. City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8395 - Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 94-1102, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING TEXT PERTAINING TO WALLS AND FENCES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Motion Benz, second Oakes. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: None HEARINGS 5. SPECIAL STUDY TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CODE TO ALLOW REMOVAL AND RECONSTRUCTION OF NONCONFORMING HIS- TORIC SIGNS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 3, 1994 and supplemental memoran- dum from the Planning Commission dated January 4, 1994. Supplemental memorandum from Planning Director Schubach dated January 11, 1994. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report. and responded to Council questions. The hearing opened at 8:25 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Warren Barr - Chamber of Commerce President, said the Chamber would support a limited review of the Sign Ordinance; advised the Council that the Chamber has a Sign and Banner Task Force that has studied the issue in depth and would be happy to provide input. The hearing closed at 8:26 P.M. Action: To approve the staff alternative recommendation dated January 11, 1994 to create an "exception" permit for historic signs and to: 1) refer the proposed text to the Planning Commission for a public hearing; 2) add the following to section 13.5-17, Nonconforming Signs: "Exception. The above provisions may be waived by the Planning Commission for a sign or signs found to be of historic value. The Commission shall base its determination on the following criteria: age of sign - is it more than 20 years old? business it advertised - did the business or activity being advertised have some prominent place in the history of Hermosa Beach? appearance - does the sign have any attrac- tive or memorable features? Do the sign 'City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8396 features demonstrate any significant trend or period in art/architectural history? An exception may be granted by the procedure set forth in Section 13.5-20, Sign Review, sub- section (b) and (c). If an exception is granted, and in order to protect the historic character of the signs, no additional signs shall be permitted on the premises. 11 And, to suspend enforcement of the regulations on tem- porary signs and banners for new businesses until revi- sions to the code in that area can be made. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Oakes and Reviczky. The meeting recessed at 8:46 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:07 P.M. Councilmember Benz requested to make a motion regarding "window sign coverage". Coming forward to address the Council on this request was: Betty Martin - 257 27th Street, said this area of the sign code had just been changed; questioned why this was coming up again when there had been no complaints and the Chamber of Commerce had said they were satisfied with the recent changes. Action: To bring back a Resolution to initiate public hearings in order to amend the code to increase the al- lowable sign area in a window to 50 percent. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Oakes and Reviczky. At 9:20 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to item 1. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. 1992-93 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS: COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1992-93, INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 14, 1993. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: _ Nancy Shelmon - representing Coopers & Lybrand, responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8397 - Action: To receive and file the 1992-93 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which includes the re- port from Coopers and Lybrand, the City's independent auditors. Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried unanimously. The Council congratulated Finance Director Copeland and her staff. 7. RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT THE OWNER OF 624 GOULD AVENUE TO APPLY FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW A NEWLY CONSTRUCTED 61 HIGH REPLACEMENT FENCE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 5, 1994. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose explained that according to the City Code for non -conforming structures, any change requires. code compliance and, under the Code, a fence in the public right-of-way could not exceed 36 inches, so this item would come back to the Council as an exception to the Code and the Council would need to provide findings to grant the exception. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Ralph Turkolu - 624 Gould Avenue property owner, said that he would willingly accept the direc- tion and was now in the process of applying for an encroachment permit through the Public Works Department, therefore there was no need for Council action tonight. There was no action needed or taken on this item. At 10:35 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to item 1(j). 8. REQUEST FROM INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION (ICA) FOR HERMOSA BEACH TO SUPPORT AN AMICUS BRIEF IN THE CASE ENTITLED, "COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND INLAND COUNTIES EMERGENCY MEDICAL AGENCY, ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN BERNAR- _ DINO, ET AL.11 Letter from Independent Cities Associa- tion dated December 30, 1993. City Attorney Vose presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Action: To approve the City of Hermosa Beach's support of an amicus brief in the case entitled, County of San Bernardino and Inland Counties Emergency Medical Agency, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al., which, if the County prevails, would foreclose cities and fire dis- tricts throughout the State from providing emergency 'City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8398 medical services, except on such terms as the County may dictate. Motion Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried unanimously. City Attorney Vose asked if the Council would be inter- ested in supporting other amicus briefs, as his office received a large number of them on many different topics. The Council concurred with Councilmember Bowler's suggestion that the information be supplied to them in their mail packets and individual Councilmembers could request any of interest be placed on the agenda. 9. BEACHES AND HARBORS CONTRACT UPDATE: LIFEGUARD AND BEACH MAINTENANCE SERVICES. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated January 4, 1994. Assistant City Manager Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To accept the County contract proposal as sent back to us with the amendment that because the "Sun Shelters" will have to be reviewed by the Parks, Recre- ation and Community Resources Advisory Commission as to the location and construction .through its own hearings, that the "Sun Shelters" not be approved as part of the contract until the contract is renegotiated again in June, parties understand that this item will be included in the contract in June, if all the terms remain the same and, that the County and the City can come to a multi-year agreement. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion car- ried unanimously. The meeting recessed at 11:20 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:30 P.M. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Planning Commission Appointment, Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 5, 1994. Action: To continue -to the Regular Meeting of January 25, 1994, at the .hour of 6:00 P.M. the formal public interviews of the following five applicants for the Planning Commission vacancy of an unexpired term ending June 30, 1996: 1) Annie Moler - Councilmember Benz; 2) Peter Tucker - Councilmember Bowler; 3) Darrell Rockefeller - Councilmember Oakes; 4) Steve Crecy - Councilmember Reviczky; and, 5) Alan Dettlebach - Mayor Edgerton, Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8399 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Benz for consideration of removing requirements of a Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) for all businesses allowed in C-1 through 6-3 zones. Those uses which require a C.U.P. should be eliminated from the allowable use list. (Continued from the December 14, 1993 meeting.) Councilmember Benz requested that due to the lateness of the hour that this item be continued to the Regular Meeting of January 25, 1994. (b) Request by Couhcilmember Benz for consideration of bringing City Attorney services in-house. The City of Manhattan Beach recently proposed this due, in part, to a study by the Anderson Group. The analy- sis of that study indicated that Manhattan Beach could realize up to a 40Y6 savings in attorney costs. (Continued from the December 14, 1993 meeting) Councilmember Benz requested that due to the lateness of the hour that this item be continued to the Regular Meeting of January 25, 1994, and requested that staff get a copy of the Anderson report from Manhattan Beach. (c) Request by Councilmember Reviczky for discussion of South School Site. Councilmember Reviczky discussed his request. Action: To place on the agenda of the January 25, 1994, the reconsideration of the implementation plans for the South School Park and to direct staff to provide the formal plan, working drawings, previous phasing, concep- tual plan, a breakdown on available monies and projected time line based upon revenue. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried unanimously. (d) Request by Councilmember Bowler to consider forming a sub -committee to deal with the library issue. Councilmember Bowler discussed his request. Action: To form a sub -committee to deal with issues related to the Hermosa Beach library composed of Coun- cilmember Bowler and Mayor Edgerton, with Councilmember Oakes as an alternate. Motion Bowler, second Benz. So ordered. City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8400 Councilmember Benz requested the return of the starting time for City Council meetings to 7:30 P.M. Action: To place on the agenda the consideration of returning the starting time for City Council meetings to 7:30 P.M. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Oakes and Reviczky. Councilmember Reviczky said he again wished to applaud the Hermo- sa Beach Fire Fighters for their dedication and protection of not only Hermosa Beach but areas throughout Southern California. The Council concurred. CITIZEN COMMENTS No one came forward at this time to address the Council. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned in memory of Manhattan Beach Police Officer Martin Ganz, slain in the line of duty, on Tuesday, January 11, 1994, at the hour of 11:55 P.M. to a Regular Adjourned Meeting on Thursday, January 20, 1994, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of a closed session for the purpose of discussion of matters of Personnel, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957: Meet and Confer; Real Estate negotiations, pur- suant to Government Code Section 54956.8; and, for matters of Pending Litigation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). I � Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-11-94 Page 8401 - MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on January 06, 1994, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton Absent: None CLOSED SESSION - The purpose of the Special Meeting was to ad- journ to a closed session for the purpose of discussion of mat- ters of Personnel, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; and, matters of Litigation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Allen v. City of Hermosa Beach. ADJOURNMENT - The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Thursday, January 06, 1994, at the hour of 9:00 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-06-94 12(3) Page 8386 ` T CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SF:340 DEMAND LIST TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 PAGE 0001 DATE 01/19/94 "NAME BlEfr-- `,��rR�—VENDOR zl , DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION F_CR- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H CSMFO 1994 ANNUAL SEMINAR 05533 001-400-1202-4317 00098 6180.00 REG/V. COPELAND 01/06/94 FINANCE ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 00419 60.00 46243 01/13/94 A I •w• VENDOR TOTAL w�ra+r+tw*+r*w�►ww***�►�►*w****r*rwr $100.00 — - - N H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00606 6193,948.84 PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/94 46176 , 1 /ACCR/ACCRUED PAYROLL 60.00 01/13/94 •., H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 105-202-0000-2030 00335 $10,873.19 ' s PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 46176 ° " r -- - 60.00 01/13/94 1� - "�•al H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 109-202-0000-2030 00134 6409.95 PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 46176 60.00 01/13/94 wi_ H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 110-202-0000-2030 00339 640,137.77 ,F PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 46176 "I� 60.00 01/13/94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 115-202-0000-2030 00193 $4,844.79 I,4I PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 46176 $0.00 01/13/94 -.i H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 125-202-0000-2030 00052 4929.74 — PAYROLL/12-15 TO 01/04/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL' 46176 -12_31 60. 00 02/13/94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 145-202-0000-2030 00331 6306.22 ' PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/94 46176 /A /ACCRUED PAYROLL"' 01/13/94 �,z H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 146-202-0000-2030 00054 $1,936.98 'IIS 1 PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/9446176 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 60.00 01/13/94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 152-202-0000-2030 00017 6434.36 PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 01/04/94 46176 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 60.00 01/13/94 ` wI H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00332 66,232.54 NI• PAYROLL/12-15 TO 12-31 ---------------...----- 01/04/94 _ /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 46176 01/13/94 I H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL _ PAYROLL/12-15 ACCOUNT 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00329 610,092.88 TO 12-31 01/04/94 /A /ACCRUED PAYROLL 46176 ;' J 60.00 01/13/94 N HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL PAYROLL/12-15 TO ACCOUNT 00243 170-202-0000-2030 00186 618,112.40 12-31 01/04/94 /ACCRUED /ACCRPAYROLL 46176 .!J --- 60.00 01/13/94 �.:• H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL PAYROLL/12-15 ACCOUNT 00243 705-202-0000-2030 00293 :4,291.88 !-` TO 12-31 01/04/94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 46176 01/121. 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002 TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 DATE 01/18/94 _T___PAY VENDOFiTJAME NUMBER TRN AMOUNT IN /REF FO N CHK -4 - DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD p ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP I' V[NDOR TOTAL w#►#•#w#ww###w###ww#w##rwwwrwwwwww##www###wwww##w#ww######wr######## $292,951.94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00749 $84,934.05 RETIREMENT ADVANCE — 01/10/94 R_ETIREMEN_T__/RETIREMENT VENDOR TOTAL#################w#####ar############# $84,934.05 -- — X1.,1 .._ i www PAY CODE TOTAL################################################################## 6377,665.59 •i,l R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS OOB57 001-400-2101-4306 01480 $32.50 PRISONER MEALS/DEC 93 22893 01/03/94 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE ��-� ♦ww VENDOR TOTAL#########################w#w#w###################################### $32.30 R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED 00152 001-400-2101-4309 00674 $86.48 +• UTILITY RAG/RUGS 01/13/94 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED 00192 001-400-2201-4309 01560 678.40 UTILITY RAG/RUGS — — 01/13/94 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS_ " v R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED 00152 001-400-3104-4309 01127 $9.50 UTILITY RAG/RUGS 01/13/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED 00192 001-400-4204-4309 02766 $330.54 UTILITY RAG/RUGS —__ 01/13/94 _ BLDG MAI_N_T /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • ' g R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00769 UTILITY RAG/RUGS 01/13/94 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCEANCE MATERIALS • wl R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED 00192 110-400-3302-4309 00940 $7.68 UTILITY RAG/RUGS 01/13/94 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL #################################################################### I., $568.10 R AT&T 05179 001-400-2101-4304 01362 $7.92 — _LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 _ 89001 12/25/93— POLICE /TELEPHONE VENDOR TOTAL R AVIATION LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERV/DEC 93 46244 $0.00 01/13/94 122893 00105 $0.00 IJI 46247 01/13/94 00017 46248 —$0_00 01/13/94 00017 46248 $0. 00 -0.1/13/94 00017 46248 —! $0.00 01/13/94 !I 00017 46248 $0.00 01/13/94 — 00017 .46248 $0.00 01/13/94 I. 00017 46248 $0.00 01/13/94 I. 7320791389001 01087 46249 ----- ---- — $0. 00 01/13/94 $7.92 00407 001-400-1205-4305 00170 $1.62 00107 46250 01/03/94 CABLE TV /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES_ $0.00 01/13/94 — .. .,j * ASPHALT PURCHASES/DEC 93 – 01/13/94 0-3103-4309 01605 $206.84ST CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS FINANCE–SFA340 R BORAL RESOURCES, INC. ASPHALT PURCHASES/DEC DEMAND LIST $61.53 93 TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 $268.37-- PAGE 0003 DATE 01/18/94 PAY ---VENDOR NAME D-11--71Y:COUNT- NUMBER—TR REF`---PO–IF--CHK' DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R AVIATION LOCKSMITH LOCK & KEY SERV/DEC 93 00407 001-400-2101-4311 01767 $5.00 00107 46250 01/03/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 40.00 01/13/94 u_�••I ! R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 001-400-4204-4309 02767 612.06 LOCKSMITH SERV/DEC 93 01/03/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00107 46250 7. $0.00 01/13/94 _1.1R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 001-400-4205-4311 00324 615.16 11I LOCKSMITH SERV/DEC 93 01/03/94 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00107 46250 $0.00 01/13/94 _ ' R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 110-400-1204-4311 00010 $2.98 .I LOCKSMITH SERV/DEC 93 01/03/94 FINANCE CASHIER /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00107 46250 $0.00 01/13/94 _ •• R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 170-400-8619-4201 00049 $36.78 i� LOCKSMITH-SERV/DEC 93 01/03/94 PD REMODEL III /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00107 46250 !' $0.00 01/13/94 110 www VENDOR TOTAL w+r*uwwwrrrrwrrrwrrrwrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrwrrwrwrr*ww+►+rrrrrrrrrrwrrwr*rrrrw $73.60 R BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS 04540 001-400-2101-4201 01428 $31.90 MEDICAL WASTE DISP/DEC93 12/31/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT www VENDOR TOTAL i►r*rwrr*xrrarr*r�r***wr*r*r***r*r*r $31.90 R STEVE+BLINDER REFUND/COMM RES 05533 001-300-0000-3405 01769 $90.00 01/13/94 /COMM CTR RENTALS www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwrwwwwrrwwwwrrwwwwwwwwrwrrrr+awwa►rri►*r*rr*rr*rwrwr*w�►wa►r*rrrwr*w $90.00 R BLUE PRINT SERVICE (BPS) 05536 160-400-8302-4316 00005 $40.58 HANDBOOKS/PUB WORKS 01/13/94 NPDES IMPROVE /rRArNrNr_ ! www VENDOR TOTAL+►r+►ww+►wwwwrwwrrrwwrwr+►wwwwrwwwrrwrrrw+►wrrrwwwrrrwr**rrrwwrrrrr*rwr*• „I R BORAL RESOURCES, INC. 05130 001 40 $40.58 R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE PRISONER LAUNDRY/DEC 93 70664 00075 46251 I'� $0.00 01/13/94 I..I 07966 46252 to nn n,i,'2.oe "i• ---- ----- i. I .. 07826 46253 !Ln nn n /1']/OA 00109 46254 $0.00 01/13/94 00109 46254 $0_00 _ 01/13/94 46255 01/13/94 1 I_ I 00163 001-400-2101-4306 01479 $122.00 070664 01010 12/31/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE _ $0.00 ASPHALT PURCHASES/DEC 93 – 01/13/94 0-3103-4309 01605 $206.84ST I MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _ R BORAL RESOURCES, INC. ASPHALT PURCHASES/DEC 05130 001-400-3104-4309 01128 $61.53 93 01/13/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS wwr VENDOR TOTALI'd w+►w+►w++►w+►r+►rr+►ww+►+►rrrrwrwrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr $268.37-- R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE PRISONER LAUNDRY/DEC 93 70664 00075 46251 I'� $0.00 01/13/94 I..I 07966 46252 to nn n,i,'2.oe "i• ---- ----- i. I .. 07826 46253 !Ln nn n /1']/OA 00109 46254 $0.00 01/13/94 00109 46254 $0_00 _ 01/13/94 46255 01/13/94 1 I_ I 00163 001-400-2101-4306 01479 $122.00 070664 01010 12/31/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE _ $0.00 `, FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH J TIME 12:22:07 DEMAND LIST PAGE 04 ., • Iw FOR 01/18/94 DATE 01/180/94 00153 ('I AP—T/ENDOR NAf1E VNO N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP l y'•� #wr VENDOR TOTAL #########w##www#####w###w###r##ww#####w############################# $122.00 ALLOWANCE $0.00 I� �- R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00319 63,802.19 00153 -----._...---- i I• $21.00 DUMP CHARGES/DEC 93 12/31/93 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT pnnn4 46256 UNIFORM RENTAL/DEC 93 99634 12/31/93 PARKING ENF _-33,802.19 $0.00 01/13/94 I. i� VENDOR TOTAL w#wrwwwwwww#ww#www##w#w#wwww##w#w#w###w####ww##w####################- ^,• $0.00 01/13/94 "I www VENDOR y R CARE STATION 03972 001-400-1203-4320 00487 $83.00 I^ ----- �� EMP HEPATITIS B" SHOTS ---- — - - -- 01/13/94 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS01/13/94 01092 46257 $618.31 ---- - - -- $0. 00 COLEN AND LEE CHECKING ACCT INTEREST 04715 01/13/94 VENDOR TOTAL w##www#rwrww#wi►#+f+rw####ww##wwr#www#rw#w#########################w###-- $93.00 00091 i I• ' 0$0.0 I„ R CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY 05095 170-400-8619-4201 00048 $12,100.00 -_ ROOF/POLICE DEPT 12/22/93 PD REMODEL III /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 08029 46258 68,750.00 01/13/94 _• I„ VENDOR TOTAL w#wwww####w#w###wr#####wwwwwr###w#r###r####w###########r#####r###### 612,100.00 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01772 6651.92 Imo. „i AUTO REP/PARTS DEC 93 ----- -' 01/13/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01013 46259 $0.00 01/13/94 • .. wsw VENDOR TOTAL w#ww#ww####w##w##w##wr###w##w##w#w###########w###w#####w############ $651.92 .z, �•, R CHEVRON USA, INC. - WESTNET GAS CHRG/DEC-93 84419 00634 12/22/93 170-400-2103-4310 00145 6148.59 1417284419 01015 46260 SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 01/13/94 -- `, 6148.59 ., • Iw CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00254 $597.31 UNIFORM RENTAL/DEC 93 99634 12/31/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM 053-99634 00002 46261 ALLOWANCE $0.00 01/13/94 R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00438 $21.00 ., UNIFORM RENTAL/DEC 93 99634 12/31/93 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 053-99634 00002 46261 I. $0.00 01/13/94 "I www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwrwr#ww#w#wwwww###www##wwrwww##r##www##w##w#www#####w#ww##w###ww $618.31 R COLEN AND LEE CHECKING ACCT INTEREST 04715 01/13/94 703-300-0000-3401 00091 $16.66CR 0$0.0 I„ /INTEREST INCOME $0.00 146262 01/13/94 /13/ W: t CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005 `! TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 DATE 01/18/94 J --PAY--VENDOR •' NAME-- VND-N—�{CCOLWT-NUMBER--TRN--NUMBER--- A I -- NV7R EF PO--�-----CHK- DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD ACCOUNT f#" ' l DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP �, J _ R COLEN AND LEE 04715 705-400-1209-4201 00428 $13,358.50 07180 46262 LIABILITY REIMS/DEC 93 01/13/94 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/13/94 R COLEN AND LEE 04715 705-400-1209-4324 00450 $1,132.76 07180 46262 SETTLEMENT/SHERRILL 01/13/94 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS¢0.00 01/13/94 �. R COLEN AND LEE j 04715 705-400-1209-4324 00451 $380.00 07180 46262 SETTLEMENT/GUMM 01/13/94 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 01/13/94 �.. i R COLEN AND LEE 04713 705-400-1209-4324 . 00452 $744.60 07180 46262LIABILITY REIMB/DEC i J 93 01/13/94 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 01/13/94 xwx VENDOR TOTAL xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx $15,599.20 i. R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-202-0000-2021 00565 $63.58 100036040 01017 46264 �••� DISCOUNT OFFERED 36040 12/31/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 01/13/94 �„ J R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-202-0000-2022 00558 $63.58CR 100036040 01017 46264 DISCOUNT TAKEN 36040 12/31/93 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 01/13/94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1101-4304 00613 $0.51 100036040 01017 46264 I" LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE `-'- ---- $0.00__ 01/13/94 �Iy R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00691 $2.77 100036040 01017 46264 • LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE _- $0.00 01/13/94 •; R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1131-4304 00515 $0.45 100036040 01017 46264 ;'•• -- - LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 - 36040 12/31/93 - CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 01/13/94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC � 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00708 $2.20 100036040 01017 46264 �ul LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE LEPHONE $0. QO 01/13/94 v; al R COM SYSTEMS, INC ,•j LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 <, 100036040 01017 $0.00 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 R COM LONG SYSTEMS, INC DISTANCE/DEC 93 R COM SYSTEMS, INC r LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00766 36040 12/31/93 - CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00764 36040 12/31/93 FINANCE ADMIN $0.90 /TELEPHONE $30.01 /TELEPHONE 100036040 01017 46264 $0.00 01/13/94 100036040 01017 46264 *_n nn nl 111210A 00017 36040 12/31/93 001-400-1203-4304 00774 PERSONNEL $21.60 /TELEPHONE 100036040 01017 $0.00 _- 00017 36040 12/31/93 001-400-1206-4304 00696 DATA PROCESSING $47.35 /TELEPHONE 100036040 01017 $0.00 46264 01/13/94 46264 01/13/94 J -•�---------11111111-- - .. ._. � - ;, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0006 TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 DATE 01/18/94 I (' i P7`iP--VENDOR NAME — ND # ACCOU NUMBER TRN k AMOUNT LNV/REF PO Ik CHK fi `- DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ k ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R COM SYSTKM9, INC 00017 001-400-1207-4304 00567 $11.44 100036040 01017 46264 I� LONG DISTANCE/DEC 13 36040 12/31/93 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 40.00 01/13/94 !,I R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-2101-4304 01361 4343.93 100036040 Otnl? 46264 I,,• LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 POLICE /TELEPHONE 4U. UO 01/13/94 ;! j R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-2401-4304 00585 $5.54 100036040 01017 46264 i• LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/13/94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00766 $31.38 100036040 01017 46264 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 01/13/94 �►•:' R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00691 $30.59 100036040 01017 46264 i I LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 BUILDING /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/13/94 i. — `:! R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00832 $80.55 100036040 01017 46264 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE - $0.00 01/13/94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4601-4304 0OB79 $32.36 100036040 01017 46264 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/13/94 ;..I R COM SYSTEMS, INC Ii 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00253 $3.63 100036040 01017 46264 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/13/94 R COM SYSTEMS. INC ! 00017 110-400-1204-4304 00085 $1.89 100036040 01017 46264 �. ••.�• LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/13/94 • •: R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00781 $3.19 100036040 01017 46264 i'1`�• LONG DISTANCE/DEC 93 36040 12/31/93 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE _ -- - $0.00 01/13/94 -1 „I aaa VENDOR TOTAL wrw;i►i►wa1►*ririt�►nor*►►****�rw+►i►+ra►*�rar+r*i►rir�►i►air*+r»*wwwirw+t�►w�*rir+r�► $650.29 I� ".! p I y' "i R COOPERS & LYBRAND 03498 001-400-1202-4201 00387 $6,146.00 1726-001703-7 07825 46265 AUDIT SERVICES FY 92-93 703-7 12/13/93 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/13/94 •:: �j<,I ass VENDOR TOTAL aaaaaaa*a+raaa+►aa+►+r+►aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa++ra+raaaaaaaaaaarirraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa $6, 146.00 ----------------- "i«I R L. N. aCURTIS & SON 00850 001-400-2201-4187 •�00379 $878.48 01/13/94 UNIFORM EXP/FIRE_ FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE `•:. --._. -. _ _ -- •I:I asa VENDOR TOTAL asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawaaaaaa►aaaa ,I �..Jw� 4' F " $878.48 06218 - 46266 $868.16 _ 01/13/174 �.. R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00488 ---$162.00 - - 013125-00 01090 46267 --- PRE -EMP PHYSICALS/DEC 93 25-00 01/04/94 PERSONNEL ---/PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 01/13/94 • - MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS Imo. MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS - - - —2250 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 00163 001-400-2101-4311 01768 $156.27 12/31/93 —POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3103-4309 01604 $58.78 12/31/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00951 $317.82 12/31/93 — —ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4201-4311 00367 $122.96 12/31/93 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4202-4311 00288 $268.86 12/31/93 — PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00770 $171.14 12/31/93 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2250 01027 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH j .M ----- - $0-_-00-_-01 /13 / 94 FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST 46271 $n on nii,11/oa sn on " TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 + PAGE 0007 DATE 01/18/94 -VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION D-ACCD NM DATE INVC PROJ J 1 PD -i€ --CHK- ik # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP I J •sw VENDOR TOTAL##w##w*+ra►*w#*####Mw#*# $162.00 • r. ^ ' R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE L. 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00236 $435.26 0$0.00 268 SHELTER COSTS/NOV-DEC 93 01/13/94 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 010014 /13/94 VENDOR TOTAL www##www##wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwara►#w+►*wa►ww#i►r##arwar#w*#**#�►w*r## $435. 26 R EASTMAN, INC. �. OFFICE SUPP/STOCK DEC 93 01396 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01319 $96.39 011601396 01024 46269 12/21/93 - GEN APPROP - /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -- -- - - $0.00 01/13/94 ww# VENDOR TOTAL www#w#w#w#wwwwwwwwwww#wrw#wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $96.39 r + �A hid , J ' R iEASY READER ., PUBLIC NOTICES/DEC 93 00011 00181 001-400-1203-4201 01156 $19.95 082493-00011 01026 46270 01/04/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/13/94 ##w VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwww#www#wwwwwwwwwww#wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww�►wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $19.95 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-202-0000-2021 00566 $34.28 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 2250 12/31/93 2250 01027 4627 1 - - -... - - — --- DISCOUNTS OFFERED --_--- - --- - - ------ $0.00 01/13/94 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-202-0000-2022 00559 $34.28CR DISCOUNTS TAKEN 2250 12/31/93 2250 01027 46271 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 01/13/94 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS - MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS Imo. MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS - - - —2250 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 00163 001-400-2101-4311 01768 $156.27 12/31/93 —POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3103-4309 01604 $58.78 12/31/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00951 $317.82 12/31/93 — —ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4201-4311 00367 $122.96 12/31/93 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4202-4311 00288 $268.86 12/31/93 — PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00770 $171.14 12/31/93 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2250 01027 46271` j .M ----- - $0-_-00-_-01 /13 / 94 2260 01027 46271 46271 $n on nii,11/oa sn on 2250 01027 46271 j .M $0.00 01/13/94 2250 01027 46271 sn on n, 11,310A + 2250 01027 46271 $O. 00 01 / 13/94 2250 01027 46271 $o nn n�i,iioa qw CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 DATE 01/16/94 rAv vCNIlUrt I11AI.1C vNU w A%.uuumI NUI'Itlt,K IKN R AMUUNI 1NV/Ktt YU w f—HK 9 $2,600.00 ,I. e 46273 DESCRIPTION TREES/HERM AVE PLANTING — 12/27/93 — --- — — CIP-90-511 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVA7$2,600.00 DATE INVC PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION dul AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP i w l R CODINGS ■MOTHER• AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00325 MAINTENANCE 0147.83 2250 01027 46271 $66.66 + MISC AUTO PARTS R CITY OFwHERMOSA BEACH 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00337 2250 12/31/93 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE COMP CURRENT YR 1,0. 00 1'�J 01/13/94 11 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00333 $5,480.26 $62.70 2250 01027 46271 I p� -- 30828 01036 MISC AUTO PARTS + 2250_______12/31/93 MAINTENANCE — — PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/13/94 ;i R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 105-400-2601-4309 00966 $13.52 2250 01027 46271 MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 12/31/93 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0:00 01/13/94 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00923 $13.22 2250 01027 46271 MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 12/31/93 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/13/94 ' R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00924 $26.70 2250 01027 46271 `,�•,' MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 12/31/93 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/13/94 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00163 160-400-3102-4311 00248 $321.79 2250 01027 46271 — ��: MISC AUTO PARTS 2250 12/31/93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE —- —— $0.00 01/13/94 l'I wwr VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwrrrwrwwwrwrwrwwwwwwwrwwwwwwwwwwwrwwwrwwwwwwwwwwa►wwwwwwarwwwwwwww $1,679.59 R EFRAM MOBIL 01400 001-400-2101-4310 00438 $49.20 369910 01028 46272 GAS PURCHASES/DEC 93 69910 01/03/94 POLICE /MOTOR I FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 01/13/94 www VENDOR TOTAL wwwrwwwwwwwwwrwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $49.20 R EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES 05380 125-400-8511-4201 00013 $2,600.00 08023 46273 TREES/HERM AVE PLANTING — 12/27/93 — --- — — CIP-90-511 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVA7$2,600.00 01/13/94 dul www VENDOR TOTAL $2,600.00 + i w l R HARBOR CITY ENTERPRISES, INC. 03571 001-400-2101-4311 01771 $66.66 3180360 01034 46274 MOTORS REPAIRS/DEC 93 80360 12/31/93 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/13/94 4 www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww+rwwww $66.66 R CITY OFwHERMOSA BEACH 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00337 $5,480.26 07173 46275 'tm WORK COMP CLAIMS/DEC 93 01/13/94 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $0.00 01/13/44 VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwrwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwi►wwwwwwwwwwwwwww $5,480.26 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01769 $257.00 30828 01036 46276 + CAR WASHES/DEC 93 30828 01/02/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/13/94 'II �v� w#w VENDOR TOTAL wwwrwwwww#ww#www#wwww#wwww#wwwwwwwwww*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww— 5637. 50 R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00350 $8,585.50 012090 PARKS MAINT/DEC 93 12090 12/25/93 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00073 $0.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH i "I VENDOR TOTAL www+►+►+►+►+►wwwwwwwwwwwwwa►www#wwww*ww*wwwwwwww+►w+►w+►wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $8, 585. 50 • P FINANCE-SFA340 i DEMAND LIST TIME 12:22:07 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-3103-4309 01606 MISC LUMBER/DEC 93 02683 FOR 01/18/94 01038 PAGE 0009 12/31/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/13/94 d DATE 01/18/94 $33.56 8302284 01038 46281 ------ 12/28/93 PARKS - - - -- ---------------- ----- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/13/94 A'1'—'VENDOR-NAM ,I„ www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww**w***ww***w*rwwwwwwwr*wwwww+►www+►wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $89.51 `I� ' I• DESCRIPTION DATE INVC ER—TR 7REF PROJ 8 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO�HF�-'—I UNENC DATE EXP - -1994 PENAL CODE/POLICE 01/13/94 POLICE R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-4201-4311 00368 $15.00 30628 01036 46276 $276.80 --------- jil CAR WASHES/DEC 93 30828 01/02/94 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/13/94 VENDOR TOTAL#############w#+►www+►+►w+rrww#wwwwrwrww#########ww####ww####ww###wwww## $272.00 r I� R LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON 02175 001-400-1203-4201 01157 $1,366.25 LEGAL FEES 12/30/93 _---- PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 07175 $0.00 46283 01/13/94 R HMC GROUP 05222 170-400-8619-4201 00051 $3,250.00 2106 07750 46277 _ ARCHITECT SERV/REMODEL 2108 12/17/93 PD REMODEL III /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00 --- 01/13/94 S b `t<' : ►#♦ VENDOR TOTAL########################wwwrwrwwwrwww#########################ww#www $3,250.00 --Its R HOZ IES RADIATOR SERVICE 00277 001-400-4202-4311 00289 $133.15 08021 • REPAIR RADIATOR/P.W. 01/13/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE 46278 - $123.00 01/13/94 VENDOR TOTAL####################################wwwwwww######################### $133.15 R INTERTEC COMPUTER SERVICES 01740 001-400-1206-4201 01224 $637.50 PRINTER MAINT/JAN-MAR 94 01/13/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00078 $0.00 46279 01/13/94 1 'II �v� w#w VENDOR TOTAL wwwrwwwww#ww#www#wwww#wwww#wwwwwwwwww*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww— 5637. 50 R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00350 $8,585.50 012090 PARKS MAINT/DEC 93 12090 12/25/93 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00073 $0.00 --- --.';I 46280 01/13/94 i "I VENDOR TOTAL www+►+►+►+►+►wwwwwwwwwwwwwa►www#wwww*ww*wwwwwwww+►w+►w+►wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $8, 585. 50 i R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-3103-4309 01606 MISC LUMBER/DEC 93 02683 $55.95 8302663 01038 46281 12/31/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/13/94 d 00167 001-400-6101-4309 01479 R LEARNED LUMBER(.nl MISC LUMBER/DEC 93 02284 $33.56 8302284 01038 46281 ------ 12/28/93 PARKS - - - -- ---------------- ----- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/13/94 r ,I„ www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww**w***ww***w*rwwwwwwwr*wwwww+►www+►wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $89.51 R LEGAL BOOKSTORE, INC. 00738 001-400-2101-4305 02123 $278.80 - -1994 PENAL CODE/POLICE 01/13/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 07748 46282 _ $276.80 --------- 01!13/94 ,j., ( rww VENDOR TOTAL wrwrwwwrwrwrwwwwwrwwwwwrwwwwwwwwwrwwwwwrwwwrwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrwrwwwwww $278.80 -- - r I� R LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON 02175 001-400-1203-4201 01157 $1,366.25 LEGAL FEES 12/30/93 _---- PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 07175 $0.00 46283 01/13/94 V qt- . . - 001 -*00-2101-4187 00577 _POLICE oIry OF *snnosA osAcn 07741 o 2 '-- 462e5 o1/�o/p� - ' ^ [�| rIwAwcs-srAo*o osnAwo LIST pAus 0010 | -1 TIME 12:22:07 001-400-2101-4305 02122 pm-�us FOR 01/18/94 oArs 01/19/94 ^ vswoon rorA- �°*°*�°°���°°°*�*°*v*�*v*���*�***°*^°°*v*v�v*****°*� . | | - -- '----- DATE ___ PROJ _ ACCOUNT_ DESCRIPTION °,""�. ""=~` "°.= �^r �. 001-400-2101-4201 01429 poLIcs ���------- ror*� °°°°°°° °°°°°°°°°°°°° �� ------------ | '----' 'R - — ' .^| '' COUNTY OF*LOS ANGELES 05337 001-202-0000-2020 01433 $330.00 06160 46284INSTALL vswmoa TOTAL °°*�**°�*°°°°°�°°°^°°°*°*°�°*°°**°*�*�^�*°°°°* mo1o.ou JDIC BACKUP/Pl) 01/13/94/ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 01/13/94R $s.aoo.no, /oowrn�or nspv�c�/pe�v� ozr5a $0.00 COUNTY OF*LOS ANGELES 05537 001-400-2101-4304 01360 $144.45CRINSTALL 462840VENDOR JDIC BACKUP/Pl) 01/13/94 POLICE /TELEPHONE06160 TOTAL $205.53 R LOUIS THE n^ILon. INC. 00079 BOOTS/PANTS GAINES 55631 12/16/93 001 -*00-2101-4187 00577 _POLICE *722.02 255631 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 07741 o 2 '-- 462e5 o1/�o/p� - ' ^ [�| vswmon TOTAL °�v�v�°°*�°°*°* °***°°v°°*�^°*°*°*°*°v°*°*�***���*°°*°°*°* m722.02 | R m«c w^ec*ooSs 03810 MAC po soppxnsc po �o�ep ��/�vrvo 001-400-2101-4305 02122 pm-�us *101.00 A9092289 /o�r�cs opsn �upp��sa 01043 *0.00 46286 01/13/p4_ �~ | vswoon rorA- �°*°*�°°���°°°*�*°*v*�*v*���*�***°*^°°*v*v�v*****°*� *1o1.uo /]~ '--- ___--___-_ n mAorsn x -p 03120 K-9 mAzwr TRAINING 1081 01/01/94 001-400-2101-4201 01429 poLIcs $210 .00 10e1 /cowreAor SnvIcs/pn/vAr 01083 $0.00 462a7 01/13/94 -� � vswmoa TOTAL °°*�**°�*°°°°°�°°°^°°°*°*°�°*°°**°*�*�^�*°°°°* mo1o.ou R xsmwEr* A.*mssnm^mo 0413e LEGALr nsnv/mov �o o�/�o�p� 001-400-1132-4201 00157 ory pnoasouron $s.aoo.no, /oowrn�or nspv�c�/pe�v� ozr5a $0.00 46288 01'1o/94 �/^~ R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00158 $5,825.00 07752 46288 LEGAL SERV/DEC 93 01/13/94 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01/13/94 ' VENDOR TOTAL $11,425.00 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 003ee 001-400-2101-4310 00437 $16.84 9307e4L2 01050 46289 GASOLINE CHARGES/DEC 93 784L2 12/10/93 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 01/13/94 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 001-400-220t-4310 00196 $43.06 930784L2 01050 46289 GASOLINE CHARGES/DEC 93 784L2 12/10/93 FIRE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 01/13/94 � R POSTMASTER 00097 110-400-1204-4305 00074 $93.00 728 06979 _^ PO BOX RENTAL/POLICE 728 01/13/94 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 :rr VENDOR TOTAL wrrwwwwr+►www+►ra►+►a►+Fwrrrwirw+rwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrwwrrrwrrwwwrwrwwrrrrwrrrwrr $93 00 ----- R POSTMASTER 03820 110-400-1204-4305 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH $2,000.00 BULK MAIL PERMIT FEES 01/13/94 FINANCE-SFA340 CASHIER DEMAND LIST SUPPLIES TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 PAGE 0011 DATE 01/18/94 AY---VENDOR-NAME---- " NUMBER—TR MOUNTT -TNV/REF ---CHK DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO W #--r--- UNENC DATE EXP w*w VENDOR TOTAL wwrrwrr*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrwwrwwwwwwwrrri►rrrrrww�►**r�►rwrwwr+*w $59.90 Ia ` R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 001-400-2101-4311 01770 $301.770 • ", BODY WORK/AUTO REPAIR 01/13/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE ;052 •:, O - - -- - -- - -- - -- — - - — --- - ------ -- v ' 01/13 / 94 , Ia • I R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 001-400-3103-4309 01608 $29.43 • •',I BODY WORK/AUTO REPAIR 01/13/94 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01052 46290 $0.00 01/13/94 I� wwr VENDOR TOTAL ►rrwwrrwrrwwwwwwrrwrrrrrrrwrrwrr�►arir*rtFir*****rr**rrr##w�*ter###r#rxwrw $331.20 --- -------- --- ' R OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVICE 03107 001-400-4101-4201 00219 $239.52 300' NOTICING/DEC 93 12/23/93 PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01064 46291 ..�� iwww $0.00 01/13/94 ,�', VENDOR TOTAL+►rwwwrrrrrwrrrwrrrwrwrrrwrrrwrrrwwrrrwrrw*rrrwwwrr***rrwrwrwrrr*rwrr $239.52 ---- - R POSTMASTER 00097 110-400-1204-4305 00074 $93.00 728 06979 _^ PO BOX RENTAL/POLICE 728 01/13/94 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 :rr VENDOR TOTAL wrrwwwwr+►www+►ra►+►a►+Fwrrrwirw+rwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrwwrrrwrrwwwrwrwwrrrrwrrrwrr $93 00 ----- R POSTMASTER 03820 110-400-1204-4305 00073 $2,000.00 BULK MAIL PERMIT FEES 01/13/94 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES _ rrr VENDOR TOTAL wwwwrwwwwrwwwwwrrrrww*rrwrrrwrrwrrrrrrrwrrrwrrwwrrrrrwrrrwrrrrwrrwwr $2.000.00 ,r ii R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-2101-4305 02124 $297.68 EXCEPTION SLIPS/POLICE 01/13/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES www VENDOR TOTAL rrrwwrwrrrwrwrrrrrwwrwrrrrrrrrw*wwrrwwwwrrrwwrwwwwwwwwwwwwrrrrwwrrrw $297.68 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00959 $27.bp MISC STORES/DEC 93 12/16/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS www VENDOR TOTAL rrwrwrrwrwwrwrrrrrwrwwrrwrrrrrrwrrwrrrwwwwrrwwwwwwwwwwwrwrrwrwrwwwrr s27. 60 R - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00474 $11,623.72 I.w STREET LIGHT BILL/DEC 93 01/13/94 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 46292 01/13/94 I,)� 06980 46293 $0.00 01/13/94 07742 46294 1"I` $297.68 01/13/9 j ..iv 01062 46295 $0.00 01/13/94 -- ---- --- - ------ - --- 00012 46296 $0.00 01/13/94 I ,. 0 -------- -- —-------- - -------..--- _RACY SERVICE/PRIVAT wsw VENDOR TOTAL+►rr+F+►+►rrrrrwrrwrrrwrwrrrrrrrwwrrrrwwrrrrrnrrrrrrrrrarw�rrrr+r�rrrarrr** $99.03 _..._..-- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 !i:! R TRIANGLE HARDWARE DEMAND LIST TIME 12:22:07 PAGE 0012 01/13/94 _ R FOR 01/18/94 DATE 01/18/94 , Ate—VENDOR- -NAME 01/13/94 • 'rl •', ,•- T NUMBER �� DESCRIPTION V /RE DATE INVC PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NC li CHK k AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 . - -- - -- /1/94 013 -3/? R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 . VENDOR TOTAL w+►w+w+►wwrwwwwwwwwwrrwrwrwrwwwrrrrrwrwrrrwrra►w*ra►rwa*w*w*rrr+rrrrwerr $11,623.72 01/13/94 _ R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 -- MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 R STATE HOARD OF EQUALIZATION 00707 001-400-2101-4303 02121 $30.00 �, R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 93 12/31/93 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00072 46297 I. $0.00 01/13/94 rrr VENDOR TOTALa►rrrrrwrrwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrr*rrr*rrrrr**#*rr*rr*rrrrrrrr�' X30. 00 ,I I � �i R STATE HOARD OF EQUALIZATION 05534 001-141-0000-1401 00237 $48.76 TANK FEES 12/31!93 07824 46298 -GAS - /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 01/13/94 L rrr VENDOR TOTALrrrr+►rwr+rww+rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrr**rrr*rrrr $48.76 I. R SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 00425 001-400-2201-4309 01561 $27.00 :;• TANK REFILLS/DEC 93 99244 12/27/93 FIRE 99244 01071 46299 J /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/13/94 b , rwr VENDOR TOTAL rrww+Fr+Frrrwrrwrrrwrrrrwrrwrrwrrrwrwr*r*w*rrw*#r*wr�►rrrr#rr�rrrrrrrr�sr $27.00 J =�•' _ R TAK'S LAWNMOWER SALES & SERV. 00169 001-400-6101-4201 00331- $99. 03 1.• ..._--.—.___,... 93 GARDEN SUPP/DEC 01/01 -. /94 PARKS (CONT 01072 46300 -------- -- —-------- - -------..--- _RACY SERVICE/PRIVAT wsw VENDOR TOTAL+►rr+F+►+►rrrrrwrrwrrrwrwrrrrrrrwwrrrrwwrrrrrnrrrrrrrrrarw�rrrr+r�rrrarrr** $99.03 _..._..-- 001-202-0000-2021 00567 $101.44 —__._-.__-----_ -- DISCOUNTS -OFFERED - 001 -202-0000-2022 00560 $101.44CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 001-400-3101-4309 00207 $138.88 MEDIANS - /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-3103-4309 01607 $63.19 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-3104-4309 01129 $23.72 _- TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4204-4309 02768 $193.37 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -----.._._ - $0.00 01 / 13/94 01.075 46,301 I� $O. 00 01/13/94 01075 46301 $0.00 01/13/94 L,.. 01075 46301 $0. 00 01/13/94 01075 46301 --$0.00 -01/13/94 01075 46301 I"I $0. 00 01/13/94 01075 46301 $0.00 01/13/94 �. r !i:! R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 01/13/94 _ R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 im i DISCOUNTS TAKEN 01/13/94 • 'rl R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 . - -- - -- /1/94 013 -3/? R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 . MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 -- MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 �, R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 001-202-0000-2021 00567 $101.44 —__._-.__-----_ -- DISCOUNTS -OFFERED - 001 -202-0000-2022 00560 $101.44CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 001-400-3101-4309 00207 $138.88 MEDIANS - /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-3103-4309 01607 $63.19 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-3104-4309 01129 $23.72 _- TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4204-4309 02768 $193.37 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -----.._._ - $0.00 01 / 13/94 01.075 46,301 I� $O. 00 01/13/94 01075 46301 $0.00 01/13/94 L,.. 01075 46301 $0. 00 01/13/94 01075 46301 --$0.00 -01/13/94 01075 46301 I"I $0. 00 01/13/94 01075 46301 $0.00 01/13/94 �. r • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 12:22:07 FOR 01/18/94 PAGE 0013 DATE 01/18/94 PAY-- -VENDOR NAME'------ ------ -- VND-# ACCOUNT -NUMBER— TRN --- # -- AMOUNT---INV/REF FO #--'-----CHK #_ ' r DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP I+� R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-6101-4309 01480 $67.07 MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01075 46301 , _ $0.00 01/13:94 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 105-400-2601-4309 00967 $81.19 • MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 011175 46301 __-01/13/94 lo. 00 01%13/94 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 105-400-2601-4309 00968 $115.18 MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01075 46301 $0.00 01/13/94 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 160-400-3102-4309 00866 $10.48 I''I — MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 -- -- 01/13/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01075 46301 $0.00 01/13/94 '� R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 170-400-8619-4201 00050 $197.96 I MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 PD REMODEL III /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01075 $0.00 46301 01/13/94 '. � R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 170-400-8619-4309 00003 $21.90 MISC HARDWARE/DEC 93 01/13/94 PD REMODEL III /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01075 46301 - $0.00 01/13/94 `'i aaw VENDOR TOTAL w*a►+rww*rrwri►r�rr*+F�rir+ra*rwr+►a*u*+fa*►erar�r�rr�►+Farwriri►irtr+rarir*r+r*�rar+ra+ru $912. 94 R XEROX CORPORATION COPIER MAINT/1994 93327 00135 001-400-2201-4201 00451 $203.50 040193327 06222 46302 01/03/94 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - - - --- $0.00 01/13/94 w+►w VENDOR TOTAL$203.50 "j i www PAY CODE TOTAL r+rar***�►�►*r+r+r+r+rww***arra*aw+rw***�rwar*ww $95,772.39 --- „I saw TOTAL WARRANTS+rra**a►*aa**arwar*aw***a*►ar********a***rw**ar*#�rar*****+rn***tea* $473,437.98 I. - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS --- COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAG ! �— TO L,5 INCLUSIVE, OF THE WAH.RAN.L@Fr.IcrFa cn .� I ATP FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE •• TO THE BUDGET. Bi ---........ � LI FINAN DSI/ ECTOR : ATE—/ ,0/9 I . January 20, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 25, 1994 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS February 8, 1994 Request for approval of Tenant/Users Liability Insurance Program (TULIP) and establishment of an administrative fee for processing TULIP applications Payroll software selection Review of Agenda Packet distribution February 22, 1994 Mid -year budget review FY 1993-94 Approval of litigation defense firm list Review of commercial events policy Special study of the zoning ordinance and enforcement ordinance re: parking in front yard setback Memo re: Imposing 17' setback on remodels of nonconforming structures Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Award of bid for irrigation South School March 8, 1994 Caltrans utility maintenance agreement March 22, 1994 Design alternatives -Biltmore Site April 12, 1994 Personnel Director Assistant City Manager City Manager Finance Director Council Subcommittee/Risk Manager Community Resources Director Planning Director Planning Commission Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director —. April 26, 1994 June 14, 1994 Storm drain/sewer tie-in June 28, 1994 July 12, 1994 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendments: 1st St. & 1st Place closure 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendments: Air Quality Element UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by: Party Council Emergency Generator capability in local 2 Public Works Director Planning Director Planning Director Police Chief Public Works Director Assistant City Manager Chamber of Commerce Public Works Director grocery stores with incentive program to be provided Council Revision of HBMC provisions pertaining to construction of public street improvements (Public Hearing) Staff County Safe Neighborhood Park Act (Grant -Prop A) application for municipal pier renovation Chamber Farmer's Market: move to Pier Avenue Council. Bring back Ordinance on Fire Flow condition and consider revision or abolishment of Fire Flow Fee. 2 Public Works Director Planning Director Planning Director Police Chief Public Works Director Assistant City Manager Chamber of Commerce Public Works Director NOTICE ITEM ld(l) - REVENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR DECEMBER, 1993 WILL NOT BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. IT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE MID- YEAR BUDGET REPORT AT THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 1994. 1d (,) TREASURER'S REPORT - DECEMBER 1993 FUND GENERAL 12/1/93 CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 12/31/93 NUMBER -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT BALANCE BALANCE 001 GENERAL $1,388,997.92 51,575,071.70 5182,804.99 (5735,046.17) (!119,560.78) 52,292,267.66 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT !1,293,150.20 !72,964.35 55,823.14 ($27,545.21) (!1,969.11) 51,342,423.37 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST. 5414,220.77 (15,000.00 $3,303.04 (!4,349.59) (!160.91) $428,013.31 110 PARKING 5113,634.37 $116,829.57 5511.70 ($73,302.67) (591,883.02) 565,789.95 115 STATE GAS TAX $715,503.34 550,201.09 53,221.96 (523,014.88) ($36,199.25) 5709,712.26 120 COUNTY GAS TAX $8,647.64 50.00 $38.94 50.00 50.00 58,686.58 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 5273,036.70 50.00 $1,229.50 ($4,844.78) 50.00 5269,421.42 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 51,763,214.51 $78,299.54 50.00 50.00 50.00 $1,841,514.05 127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX $403,166.39 5114,991.66 51,815.48 50.00 (5111,398.25) $408,575.28 145 PROPOSITION A FUND $120,573.92 516,524.00 5542.95 ($1,644.12) 50.00 5135,996.75 146 PROPOSITION C FUND $143,674.71 513,217.00 5646.98 (51,936.98) 50.00 $155,601.71 150 GRANT FUND 5154,289.74 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 $154,289.74 152 AIR QUALITY MGT.DISTRICT $17,740.43 $5,077.69 $79.89 (5388.77) 50.00 522,509.24 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT $43,551.86 $21,880.64 $196.12 ($7,731.06) (5417.83) 557,479.73 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 53,184,521.01 50.00 $81,006.77 (514,375.67) (51,346.42) 53,249,805.69 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 5798,713.39 52,220.00 53,596.66 ($190,799.68) ($5,079.58) $608,650.79 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 5518,889.19 5821.50 52,336.59 50.00 (53,314.33) 5518,732.95 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND 5895,151.84 50.00 585,545.00 (576,334.16) (591.27) 5904,271.41 512,250,677.93 52,083,098.74 $372,699.71 ($1,161,313.74) ($371,420.75) $13,173,741.89 TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PayroLL 55,879.27 5572,613.54 5571,559.78 56,933.03 $10,114,062.50 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $1,630,210.55 $540,047.23 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $172,187.93 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE GENERAL PAYROLL OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT BALANCE $1,489,859.07 $6,060.65 ------------ $1,495,919.72 559,517.85 $1,436,401.87 511,744,273.05 $13,180,674.92 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council January 18, 1994 City Council Meeting of January 25, 1994 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of December 1993. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, XTreasurer Workma NOTED: . A/ Stephe R. Burrell City Manager INVESTMENT REPORT - DECEMBER 1993 GRAND TOTAL $12,284,320.28 -------------- -------------- Respectfully Submitted, John man Ci Tr surer DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET INSTITUTION ------------------------------------------------- TOTAL INVESTMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 12/1/93 !7,360,000.00 MATURITY (250,000.00) 12/01/93 BALANCE 12/31/93 $7,110,000.00 4.365% LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 12/1/93 $1,630,210.55 BALANCE 12/31/93 $1,630,210.55 3.600% U.S. TREASURY BOND Investment $1,005,937.50 09/14/90 06/30/94 $1,005,937.50 $1,044,060.00 8.50% Investment $989,687.50 12/03/92 11/30/97 S 989,687.50 51,038,440.00 6.24% Investment 1,008,437.50 02/18/93 01/31/98 51,008,437.50 51,022,810.00 5.625% INVESTMENT TOTAL 511,744,273.05 --------------- SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 12/01/93 5527,814.40 BALANCE 12/31/93 $527,814.40 8.625% CHICAGO TITLE BALANCE 6/30/93 $12,232.83 ADJUSTMENT 148.90 BALANCE 12/31/93 512,232.83 2.594% TRUSTEE TOTAL 5540,047.23 GRAND TOTAL $12,284,320.28 -------------- -------------- Respectfully Submitted, John man Ci Tr surer Mayor and Members of the City Council ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Recommendation January 12, 1994 City Council Meeting January 25, 1994 It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution relative to the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach for the year 1994. This policy is the same as the council adopted in 1993. On January 1, 1985 the governor signed Chapter 1226 legislation into law requiring that local public agencies file an Annual Statement of Investment Policy. The 1994 Hermosa Beach City Treasurer's investment policy will comply with Government Code Section 53600 thru 53659, which governs municipal investments in the State of California. The California Government Code provides a large menu of legally allowed public fund investment opportunities. I have attempted to tailor this investment policy to reflect the council's investment personality, while continuing to strive for maximum return on investment funds. Safety of principle is my first priority. This year I have requested authorization to invest in: 1. Time Certificates of Deposit 2. U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds 3. Bankers Acceptances 4. California State Local Agency Investment Fund 5. Los Angeles County Pool Investment Fund Y The attached 1994 investment policy resolution is respectfully submitted for your review. Respectfully submitted, Jo Y. Workman C ty reasurer NOTED; Step 9c. Burrell City Manager ' I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1994 WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed legislation during the 1984 session requiring the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed such legislation into law effective January 1, 1985 (Chapter 1226); and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach declares the annual Statement of Investment Policy to be as follows: PURPOSE: This statement is intended to provide a guideline for the prudent investment of temporary idle cash, trust funds and restricted monies and to outline a policy for maximizing the efficiency of the cash management system. Ultimate investment goals include the enhancement of economic status and the protection of pooled cash investments. OBJECTIVE: The cash management system of the City of Hermosa Beach is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus insuring the investment of monies to the fullest extent possible. Attempts to obtain highest interest yields possible are statement of fact as long as investments meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity. POLICY: The City of Hermosa Beach operates its investment program with State and self-imposed constraints. It does not buy stocks; it does not speculate; it does not deal in futures, options or security loan agreements. With regard to investment companies, the City will deal only with investment companies registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The City Treasurer will have sole discretion over Security Trading, except the state of California and Los Angeles County Investment pool. Longer term investments (over one year) are generally limited to maturities of 3 years or less, but will never exceed five years. Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 1. Safety: The safety and risk associated with an investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 refers to the potential loss of principal, interest or a combination of these amounts. Since it is the primary duty and responsibility of the Treasurer to protect, preserve and maintain cash and investments placed in his/her trust on behalf of the citizens of the City, Hermosa Beach only invests in those instruments that are considered very safe. 2. Liquidity: This refers to the ability to "cash in" at any moment in time with minimal chance of losing some portion of the principal or interest. An adequate percentage of the portfolio should be maintained in liquid short-term investments which can be converted to cash if necessary to meet disbursement requirements. Since all cash require- ments cannot be anticipated, investments in securities with active secondary or resale markets is highly recommended. Emphasis should be on marketable securities with low sensitivity to market risk. 3. Yield: yield is the potential dollar earnings an investment can provide, and sometimes is described as the rate of return. It should become a consideration only after the basic requirements of safety and liquidity have been met. The City's investment philosophy is to insure the safety of principle and to provide money when needed. A high dollar yield on investments, though important, ranks third in the priority of investment strategy. Depository Services Money must be deposited in state or national banks, state or federal savings associations, or state or federal credit unions in the state. It may be in inactive deposits, active deposits or interest-bearing active deposits. The deposits cannot exceed the amount of the bank's or savings and loan's paid up capital and surplus. We require that each financial institution submit current financial statements which are evaluated prior to the investment of funds. We use the following criteria: The institution must have been in business at least three years. The institution must submit audited financial statements. In addition, examination is made of the Reserve for Loan Losses category to evaluate the financial trend of the institution's asset base. Whenever possible, the use of several years' financial data is evaluated to present a trend of activity in the institution. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 We also require the interest be paid to the City on a monthly basis (current state law only requires quarterly payment). Authorized Investments Generally, investments shall be made in the context of "prudent man" rule, which states that, "investments shall be made with judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: TCD's (Time Certificates of Deposits) which are insured for $100,000 by FDIC or FSLIC or fully collateralized as required by state law if over $100,000 are purchased. Not more than 5% of the City's portfolio is invested in any one institu- tion. Time Certificates of Deposits are safekept in a legally acceptable safekeeping account. Total purchases are not to exceed 30% of surplus funds. An institution must meet the following criteria to be considered by the City: 1. The institution must be located in California. 2. The institution must have current financial information, signed contract and waiver on file with the City. 3. The institution must maintain a net worth to asset ratio of a least 5%, and have a positive earnings record. 4. The institution must be at least 3 years old. U. S. TREASURY's are direct obligations of the United States Government. U. S. TBILLS are issued weekly with maturity dates up to one year. They are issued and traded on a discount basis and the interest is figured on the 360 day basis, actual number of days. They are issued in amounts of $10,000 and up, in multiples of $5,000. They are a highly liquid security. U.S. TNOTES are initially issued with two to ten years maturities. They are actively traded in a large secondary market and are very liquid. The Treasury may issue note issues with a minimum of $5,000.00. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BANKERS ACCEPTANCES are negotiable time drafts drawn to finance the export, import, shipment or storage of goods, and they are termed "Accepted" when a bank guarantees to pay the face value at maturity. A Banker's Acceptance constitutes an irrevocable obligation of the accepting bank and a contingent obligation of the drawer and of any endorsees whose names appear upon it. The bank is protected by its customer's agreement to provide the necessary funds in advance of the maturity of the Acceptance and also by the pledge of documents such as bills of lading, independent warehouse of terminal receipts, and other documents evidencing ownership and the insurance of the goods so financed. Cities and other local agencies are authorized to purchase Banker's Acceptances subject to several restrictions. First, the Banker's Acceptance must be eligible for purchase by Federal Reserve Systems. Second, purchases of Banker's Acceptances must not exceed two hundred seventy (270) days' maturity or 40% of the City's surplus money invested under Sections 53601 and/or 53635. Finally, no more than 5% of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in the Banker's Acceptances of any one commercial bank (Government Code Sections 53601 (f), 53635 (f). LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND is a special fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum of $15,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of eight transactions per month. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in twenty-four hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly via a check or warrant. The State keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the earnings. The interest rates are fairly high because of the pooling of the State surplus cash with the surplus cash deposited by local governments. This creates a multi -billion dollar money pool and allows diversified investments. In a high interest rate market, we do better than LAIF, but in times of low interest rates, LAIF yields are higher. The City continually invests in the Local Agency Investment Fund (Government Code Section 16429). LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOL INVESTMENT FUND California Government Code ("Government Code") Section 53684 allows local agencies in the County of Los Angeles (the "County") to deposit excess funds in the Los Angeles County Treasury Pool for the purpose of investment by the treasurer and tax Collector of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the County (the "Treasurer") pursuant to Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635; The County keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed 16 basis points per month. The number of monthly transactions are not restricted. Safekeeping Certificate of Deposits or Receipts of Public Funds must be mailed or delivered to the City. No safekeeping provisions are provided. Banker's acceptances are actual "physical" securities, meaning they are evidenced by actual certificates. All Treasuries, term notes and most Agency securities are "book entry" securities, meaning they are held at the Federal Reserve where only a book entry is used to denote ownership. Collateral for time deposits in banks and savings and loans are held by the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) or an approved Agency of Depository of the financial institution. Securities purchased from broker/dealers shall be held in third party safekeeping. Public Trust All participants in the investment process shall act as custodians of the public trust. Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust. In a diversified portfolio it must be recognized that occasional measurement losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's investment return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented. Risk Tolerance The City Council recognizes that investment risks can result from issued defaults, market price changes or various technical complications leading to temporary illiquidity. Portfolio diversification is employed as a way to control risk. Investment Managers are expected to display prudence in the selection of securities, as a way to minimize default risk. No individual investment transaction shall be undertaken which jeopardizes the total capital position of the overall portfolio. The Treasurer shall periodically establish guidelines and strategies to control risks of default, market price changes, and illiquidity. Reporting The Treasurer or his deputy shall submit a monthly investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 report to the City Council. This report will include all required elements of the monthly report as prescribed by Government Code Section 53646. Required elements of the monthly report include: a. Type of investment b. Name of institution C. Date of investment d. Date of maturity e. Amount of deposit or cost of the security f. Current market value g. Asking price h. Rate of Interest NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: That an annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa beach has been filed by the City Treasurer for calendar year 1994 in compliance with Section 53646 (A) of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JANUARY 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST; CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM; J;�� I CITY ATTORNEY January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 AUDITOR REVIEW OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the review of the 1992-93 Appropriation Limitation submitted by the City's independent auditor, Coopers and Lybrand. Background: In November of 1979, Article,XIIIB of the California State Constitution (commonly known as the Gann Limitation) was added by the voters through Proposition 4. This Article established limits, using a formula, on state and local governments for appropriation of revenue from tax proceeds. The City Council annually adopts the appropriation limitation; the 1992-93 limit was adopted on June 22, 1993. Proposition 111, which was passed by the voters in June 1990, requires the City to conduct a review of the appropriation limit during the annual financial audit. Analysis: The auditor's review of the 1992/93 appropriation limit determined that, as far as their procedures provide, appropriate procedures were followed in determining and adopting the limit. -Oka-IQY� Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: ovp Steph urrell, cityanager audit/aplimit � Coopers &L brand , Y certified public accountants The Honorable City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California: We have applied the procedures enumerated below to the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 of the City of Hermosa Beach for the year ended June 30, 1993. These procedures, which were agreed to by the League of California Cities and presented in their Article XIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines, were performed solely to assist you in meeting the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIIB of the California Constitution. This report is intended for the information of management and the City Council. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public records. The procedures performed were as follows: 1. We obtained the completed worksheets (#1 through #7) presented in the Article XIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines (or other alternative computations), and determined that the limit and annual adjustment factors were adopted by resolution of the City Council. We also determined that the population and inflation options were selected by a recorded vote of the City Council. 2. For the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6, we, added line A, last year's limit, to line E, total adjustments, and agreed the resulting amount to line F, this year's limit. 3. We agreed the current year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations limit worksheet #6 to the other worksheets described in #1 above. 4. We agreed the prior year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations limit worksheet #6 to the prior year appropriations limit adopted by the City Council during the prior year. These agreed-upon procedures are substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion on the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Based on toe application of the procedures referred to above, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 was not computed in accordance with Article XIIB of the California Constitution. Had we performed additional procedures or had we made an audit of the accompanying Appropriations Limit - worksheet #6 and the other completed worksheets described in #1 above, matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. Los Angeles, California _ November 8, 1993 .. ', CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I 1993-94 BUDGET CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT a LIMITATION FOR 1986-87 FISCAL YEAR $8,609,437 1987-88: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 3.47% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.91% 1988-89: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 4.66% CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH POPULATION CHANGE 1.81% 1989-90: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 5.19% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.14% 1990-91: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 4.21% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.36% 1991-92: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 4.14% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.73% 1992-93: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE —0.64% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POEULATION CHANGE 1.49% 1993-94: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 2.72% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 0.96% LIMITATION FOR 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR $12,040,740 January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members - Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 FRANCHISE RENEWAL EXTENSION 7 Recommendation It is recommended by the Cable Television Advisory Board that Council extend the City's contract with MultiVision from the previous extension through the end of February, 1994 to a new date of May 31, 1994. Background On August 10, 1993 Council voted to extend the City's franchise agreement with MultiVision from its scheduled expiration of October 31, 1993 to the end of February (see Attachment A). This extension was granted in order to allow time for FCC rule making with regards to the Cable Act of 1992 to take effect; to allow CSG & Associates to review the Cable Television Board's recommended strategy; and to allow the Board to incorporate the consultant's revisions into City ordinances as appropriate. The Cable Television Board assigned a negotiating subcommittee comprised of Chairperson Tollefsen and Board Member Acosta to represent the majority at meetings with MultiVision and to work towards a franchise renewal agreement. Analysis As was revealed at the November 15, 1993 Cable Board meeting, MultiVision has expressed concern with regards to Mr. Tollefsen's participation on the Board (due to his employment with Hughes) and more specifically as a member of the negotiating subcommittee. Eli As -a -result, meetings scheduled between MultiVision and the City were postponed, pending the outcome of the City's inquiry and MultiVision's stance with regards to the composition of the subcommittee. This unanticipated interruption in negotia.-ions has compromised the revised timeline approved by the Board at the November 15th meeting. A new recommended timeline is attached for Council review and approval (see Attachment B). It is noteworthy that after consulting with the Fair Political Practices Commission, the City has held firm in its stance that Mr. Tollefsen has no conflict of interest with regards to the issue of franchise renewal. At their January 17, 1994 meeting, the Board voted to retain the negotiating subcommittee as established absent any reversal of the decision from the FPPC. Attachments: 1. Attachment A: August 10, 1993 Council Item "Franchise Renewal Extension" 2. Attachment B. Revised Timeline Respectfully Submitted, Ma�Rooney Assistant City Manager Concur: Stephen R' Burrell City Manager July 30, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council ATTACHMENT "A" City Council Meeting of August 10, 1993 FRANCHISE RENEWAL EXTENSION Recommendation It is recommended by the Cable Television Advisory Board and staff that City Council approve the attached letter of agreement to extend the existing agreement with NfultiVision for a period of four (4) months from the set franchise expiration in order to provide the Board additional time to review the impacts of the Cable Television Act of 1992 . Background The Franchise agreement between MultiVision Cable and the City of Hermosa Beach is set to expire in October, 1993. To date, the Board has been working diligently to proceed with assessing community needs and evaluating the operator's past performance in order to proceed with a responsible franchise renewal process. The Board has adooted a basic strategy of using the ordinances Manhattan Beach adopted as a baseline for negotiations with NfultiVision while incorporating items unique to Hermosa Beach (such as an additional consumer protection ordinance). The Board has elected to hire Cable Television experts (CSG consultants) to e%-aluate the proposed ordinances from a technical standpoint: to evaluate the financial Solvency of \vtult1V1sion: and to determine what the strenaths and weaknesses of the %,lanhatta n Beach ordinances are. CSG will also critique the City's proposed ordinances and will compare the provisions of each VVIth State and Federal mandates. All expenses from :his study are charged to the S 15.000 the Citv_ received from MultiVision for renel.val related expenses. pale 1 ■ Analysis In evaluating the proposed ordinances, it has become important to look at the provisions of the Cable Act of 1992 iri order to determine whether it is in the best interests of the City to enforce its own ordinance or to rely on the federal mandates on a point by point basis. The City may elect to enforce the provisions of either but to do so must notify the cable operator in writing of which standards will be applied in each case. Rate regulation is another provision of the Cable Act of 1992 and the City must decide if and how this regulation will occur. It is clearly to the City's advantage to take the additional time to obtain accurate information from the consultant and to review the rulemaking from the FCC in order to formulate the most comprehensive ordinances for Cable Television Franchise operation. If the City adopted ordinances and proceeded with the renetival process without a clear understanding of the Cable Act, it is likely the City would be faced with subsequent clean-up work to bring the ordinances in line with regulations. I FISCAL IMPACT: NO INIP:XCT ON THE BUDGET. I Respectfully Submitted, INiar� Cooney Actimay Cin' Manager Concur: Charles S. Vose, Cin, Attorney pane" Cityo 21ermosa lTeac� �`. Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 August 3!1993 Mr. Donald R. Granger Regional Vice President MultiVision Cable TV 3041 East Miraloma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 RE: CATV FRAINCEISE RENEWAL -EXTENSION OF EXISTLNG FRAINCHISE NTTI3 CITY OF E ERNIOSA BEACH , Dear Mr. Granger: The Citv of Hermosa Beach is continuing to pursue a schedule for consideration of the franchise renewal that has been requested by MultiVision. Based upon the work beim accomplished by the City's Cable Television Advisor -v Board and the need for further clarification of the new regulations adopted by the Federal Government_ it does not appear that we will be able to scl;cdule: a Citti Council public heal-tg on the franchise renewal before the end of this cale.^,dar year. We recognize that the current franchise terminates in October of 1993. In order to properly consider the franchise renewal in accordance with auoiic.able federai pries and crocedures and to not negative!v imt,act current le,.,ei.s of sc7%1ce to the residents of the Cin- of He=osa Be=*L it is recommended that :he curent franc use be e\ -tended for a period of four months. It is the uncle rstanc:'_11a of the Cin, Council that you ':ave alreadv received a cope or the propos'--d amen;-..ents to the franchise -e --illations and franchise ordinance % hich :-e being �cc�sidered b� the Cabie ele,.ision:�d%ison Board. Funherme-e. there are onaeing negotiations between representatil.'es of the Cit~, and 1u: i� V. ccnc=d*ng the terms or :he franchise rene,,vai. Mr. Donald R. Granger August 3, 1993 Page 2 Based upon prior correspondence and discussions with MultiVision, the City Council has agreed to the requested four month extension of the existing franchise in order to meet the above schedule. Please advise the City immediately if this four month extension of the existing franchise upon all current terms applicable is not acceptable to MultiVision. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. We look forward to hearing from you concerning the continued scheduling of informal meetings to conclude this franchise renewal process. Very truly yours, Charles S. Vose City Attorney Reviewed and Accepted: By: Donald R. Granger MultiVision Cable T.V. Date: FRANCHISE RENEWAL TLrIELINE REVISED 1/17/94 APPROVE CONSUMER PROTECTION ORDINANCE CABLE BOARD 11/15/93 CONSUMER PROTECTION ORDINANCE CITY COUNCIL 1/11/94 APPROVE CABLE OPERATOR ORDINANCE CABLE BOARD 3/21/94 RECOINII,IENDATION - MULTIVISION FRAiNCI3ISE RENEWAL, 3/21/94 PUBLIC HEARING: FR aNCHISE RENEWAL CITY COUNCIL 4/12/94 ADOPT CABLE OPERATOR ORDINANCE CITY COUNCIL 4/26/94 RENEWAL AGREE`IENT MULTIVISION CITY COLICIL 5/10/94 CONTINGENCY _-MEETING 5/24/94 .F January 19, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION PROJECT Recommendation That the City Council adopt a resolution of support as requested by Etta Simpson for the continuing effort led by the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project. Background A proposed resolution is attached for your review. In addition, an update on the status of Bay Restoration Plan and schedule for completion is attached. A copy of the complete plan is available for review in the office. A resolution of support does not commit the City to any funding requirements: Respectfully submitted, , Stepto It. Burrell City Manager 10 1h 11 Sana Monica BAY Restoration PROJECT 101 Centre Plaza Drive Monterey Park, CA 91-54 213 266'516 Fax 213 266 7600 A Partnership To Restore And Protect Santa Monica Bav SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE ON STATUS OF BAY RESTORATION PLAN AND SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OVERVIEW OF THE SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION PROJECT The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (SMBRP) was formed in 1_9.88 when Congress included Santa Monica Bay in the National—Estuary �Progra'm (NEP) in recognition of the need to protect its unique natural resources. Funded by the USEPA and the State of California, the SMBRP is a unique coalition of government, environmentalists, scientists, industry, and the public charged with finding solutions to the problems of the Bay's ecosy§tem, and detailing them in a comprehensive document called the Santa Monica Bav`Restoration Plan. THE SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION PLAN To be unveiled to the public in January, 1994, the Bay Restoration Plan is a practical, effective, readily implemented guide to achieving a restored and protected Santa Monica Bay. It represents the kind of consensus that is necessary to take the job of restoration from a conceptual ideal to a practical series of steps we believe will result in true improvements to the Bay's ecosystem. 7z� Principals of the Plan- Following are the six key principles which underlie the Plan_ CONSENSUS PLANNING - The Plan was collaboratively developed with local, Funded bY US EPA state and federal elected officials and agencies, user groups, environmentalists, and the State water Resources dischargers, and the public, and was supported by the scientific expertise of the Control Board in cooperation SMBRP's Technical Advisory Committee. with the public, local agencies, and industn•. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP - The Plan embraces the principle that our generation has inherited the responsibility to act as stewards of Earth's natural .�� resources so that they may be passed on to our children and theirs in a' healthy, thriving condition. i� WATERSHED PERSPECTIVE - The Plan views the Santa _Monica B_v watershed as a single hydrological entity, rather than a collection of political jurisdictions. Thus it takes - a comprehensive approach to the problems of the Bay, ` t incorporating a detailed understanding of its many distinct features and distinct _ ways in which different human activities in different places affect the Bay ecosystem. December 1993 Printed on recycled paper C7 DIVERSITY - The Plan embodies respect for the diversity of life found in the Bay and watershed, and the rich contribution ethnic diversity m kis to the County's economy and quality of life. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY - The Plan calls for a fiscally responsible approach to implementation by prioritizing actions so that the most important and most cost-effective actions are pursued first, and that the responsibility to pay for actions is equitable. � COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT - The Plan incorporates the views and interests of affected communities, inland as well as coastal. Summary of Key Bay Restoration Plan Actions - Following are highlights from the Plan: POLLUTION PREVENTION - The Plan recommends expanding public education efforts, focusing on source reduction of toxics from households and small business, -and expansion of programs for recycling and collection of hazardous wastes. REDUCTION OF URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION - The Plan recommends a tiered approach to controlling pollutant inputs from siormwater/urban runoff focusing first on low-cost, non-structural measures with watershed -wide effects. Additionally the Plan recommends pollutants to target for control for individual subwatersheds. MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES - The Plan calls for the full secondary treatment of municipal sewage discharge to Santa Monica Bay, and maximum reuse of reclaimed wastewaters and biosolids. CONSUMING BAY SEAFOOD - The Plan calls for ongoing assessment and expanded communication of health risks associated with the consumption of recreationally caught seafood from Santa Monica Bay. Y SWIMMING IN BAY WATERS - The Plan recommends that a beach water uali ty reporting, system be developed to enable the public to determine how safe"it is to swim in the eci eBay at spfic locations; and that an epidemiologic_ study (see research) be conducted of the health effects of swimming in Bay waters and near storm drain outlets. HABITAT RESTORA770N, PROTECTION, AND MANAGEMENT - The Plan also recoihmends restoration of the Ballona Wetlands, Ballona Lagoon, Malibu Lagoon and Lower Zuma Creek and Lagoon. At also calls for new, permanentbreeding sites for the California least tern; and for the continued restoration of the El Segundo Dunes to - include an El Segundo Dunes Habitat Preserve. — December 1993 . 1k EDUCA77ON - The Plan calls for a comprehensive and coordinated Public Education effort including outreach to..schools, and ongoing mini -grants to targeted communities on Bay related issues, especially urban runoff and polfution prevention. WATERSHED PLANNING - The Plan calls for sub -watershed planning and provides detailed programs for the Malibu Creek watershed as a model for other subwatershed planning efforts. BAY MONITORING - The Plan calls for a "retooled" Santa Monica Bay and Watershed Monitoring Program which would link existing monitoring efforts, avoid duplication, and define quantifiable ways to determine the success or failure of various programs called for in the Plan. RESEARCH - The Plan recognizes that further research is needed in many areas, for example: an epidemiological study; a study of atmospheric deposition 4f pollutants; and a study on the remediation of contaminated sediments. 1 SCHEDULE FOR PLAN COMPLETION In order to allow adequate time to incorporate the Management Committee's many comments, the Plan Completion Schedule has been revised to the following: - Approve the Bay Restoration Plan for Public Review Jan 5/6, 1994- - 994-r- Public Review Thru March 10 - Mailout Revised Plan and Public Comment Record Beginning of April - Approve the Bay Restoration Plan for Submittal to Governor End of April - Coastal Commission Consistency Concurrence May 11 Governor's Review and Concurrence May/June �- - State of the Bay Conference June Submittal to EPA Administrator June/July - Implementation Begins July 1994 December 1993 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF THE SANTA MONICA BAY RESTORATION PLAN: COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE BAY WHEREAS, Santa Monica Bay is an economic resource for the region, contributing to the ambiance which draws over 25 million tourists annually to Los Angeles County and which activity supports more than 392,000 full and part-time jobs; and, WHEREAS, Santa Monica Bay is a recreational, environmental and educational resource for the people who live in the communities around it and receives more than 50,000,000 "user visits" (local and tourist) annually, including school groups; and, WHEREAS, Santa Monica Bay is adjacent to one of the most populous, urbanized coastal metropolitan areas in the United States and is used for a variety of purposes that can degrade the Bay including the discharge of treated municipal and industrial wastewater, urban and stormwater runoff, beach litter, marine debris, oil and hazardous spills, and aerial fallout of pollutants; and, WHEREAS, through a series of raw sewage discharges in the mid -1980's and through the publicity surrounding a study on fish contamination in the Bay, the attention of the public and of local elected officials was focused on the state of the health of Santa „Monica Bay causing them to come together with state and federal regulators to form the Santa Monica Bay Project with the Southern California Association of Governments; and, WHEREAS, the Santa Monica Bay Project received funding from the State and local governments to do an initial assessment of the health of Santa Monica Bay and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 released their report, The State of the Bay, in 1988, which clearly indicated that much needed to be done to clean-up the Bay; and, WHEREAS, by an Act of Congress, Santa Monica Bay was added to the National Estuary Program in 1988 and the state, federal and local governments along with business interests, environmental organizations and the general public jointed to form the Santa Monica Restoration Project to further assess the health of Santa Monica Bay and devise a Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) for the restoration of the Bay, which Plan is to address four key issues of overriding concern to the public: How safe is it to swim in the Bay? How safe is it to eat seafood taken from the Bay? How well is the Bay ecosystem protected? How well are marine habitats protected? and, WHEREAS, since the creation of the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project, much progress has been made in reducing pollutant inputs to the Bay;_and, WHEREAS, the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project has recently released the CCMP, called the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Plan, the culmination of five years of scientific assessment, policy discussions and negotiations among and between local government officials, federal and state regulators, and private sector interests, which Plan identifies specific actions to restore the health of Santa Monica Bay; and which Plan identifies key areas of concern for pollution reduction; and, WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach greatly values the varied resources of Santa Monica Bay, that our citizens use and enjoy the Bay, that the Bay is a valued asset and contributes to the economic health of our Region, and that the quality of life of our children and grandchildren depends upon the restoration of the health of the Bay; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby receive and agree to support The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Plan: a Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for the Bay, and that the City of Hermosa Beach acknowledges the five years of cooperative effort that produced this plan, which effort included significant contributions from the staff of City of Hermosa Beach; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach joins in a partnership of local, state, and federal government to obtain funding for the Plan's implementation; and will actively pursue funds to implement the Plan; and, .BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach urges its federal and state representatives to support the Plan; and urges the Governor of California and the USEPA Administrator to approve the Plan and to continue support for its implementation. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 1994. ST: PROVED AS TO FORM: President of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California City Clerk City Attorney 0 RECIVED JAN 2 4 1994 NOY FFICE � lAzeze-2-1-e-1 , -,moi ✓� �z ����-J � �l/f�;��� �✓ l�� ,ick , .,%/ /�✓ ,�'���.1/ , d'o c -- -7i'7� v4e, RECEIVED 611C Z JAN 2 4 1994 Cu--,,-S-7vi CGf /-c:p2,N iZ CITY % GR. OFFICE 7 Tie /4�2� '6��e �/��L� i��� � ,�'�✓ .� X14'/ �1�� �� �.-� agnut-,� , 51�L r - % owec.��ai� � / OlC � .L a RECEIVED JAN 2 4 1994 clrY�ar "-GR. OFFICE elf- '� {',cam— - C✓7r/X/1/�G��A— �(%�-,t/ C7'r.%��, ✓/�%172G��1✓ �-'v: -4a- G%G✓�ZCGi Ger�v `�lv �G'�F����'�'GG�✓cam. f&,ue 7 3�y �T RECEIVED JAN 2 4 1994 CITY Mu"R. OFFICE � j�/L�.s fes,%-�i�✓ �'cc7-�- � �„-� .. C�5z""Xll A-, x�Li �2/1/fii �Fx f� CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Plain q,�r�?or fi SUBJECT: Referrals Back to the Planning Commission from the City Council on Modifications to C.U.P.'s and Other Development Permits DATE: January 18, 1994 Recommendation Adopt the attached resolution to initiate a study to eliminate or modify the required automatic referrals back to the Planning Commission, when the City Council modifies Conditional Use Permits or other development permits, on appeal. Background This study is being initiated by staff as a means to increase the efficiency of the City's decision making process. Analysis Staff has received many complaints and expressions of concern about the cumbersome process of referring City Council modifications back to the Planning Commission for review and comment. The zoning ordinance requires this referral for any modification, on appeal, of Conditional Use Permits, Variances, etc. These referrals are required regardless of the significance of the modification. Staff would suggest that referrals be optional. State law requires certain specific legislative actions, such as zone changes, General Plan amendments, and zoning ordinance amendments, to be referred back when modified. However, this requirement does not apply to Conditional Use Permits or other discretionary development permits. Thus, in order to increase efficiency and reduce delays of the City's decision making process, the elimination of the automatic requirement for referrals should be considered. CON CU Stephe Burrell, City Ma ger KR:p/memo4a ' 0 L/ �� _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 J 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20' 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO INITIATE A STUDY TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1413 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE OR MODIFY THE REQUIREMENT THAT CITY COUNCIL MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, ON APPEAL, BE REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on January 25, 1994, to discuss the above described issue and made the following findings: A. The requirement that City Council modifications to Planning Commissions actions be referred back to the Planning Commission causes unnecessary delays in the decision making process; B. To increase the efficiency of the City's appeal process elimination of the referral requirement should be considered; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby directs staff to conduct the necessary public hearings for consideration of an amendment to the zoning ordinance as described above; PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: pjccrsinta APPROVED AS,,TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY - 1 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Ken Robertson, Associate PlannerP�- SUBJECT: Resolution to Initiate Amendments to the Sign Ordinance in Regards to Window Sign Coverage. DATE: January 18, 1994 Attached, for your adoption, is a resolution to initiate the necessary public hearings for consideration of an amendment to increase the allowable coverage for window signs from 20% to 50%. The City Council, at the meeting of January 11, 1994, directed staff to prepare the subject resolution. CONCUR: 9 % Michael Schubach Planning Director NOTED: Stephen Rk rrell City Manager i (D U CP—) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO INITIATE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT WINDOW SIGNS ARE ALLOWED TO OBSCURE THE WINDOW FROM 20% TO 50% WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on January 25, 1994, to discuss the issue of window signs and their allowable coverage and made the following findings: A. The sign ordinance currently limits the amount a window sign can obscure the "glass surface area of the window" to a maximum of 20%; B. To allow businesses more flexibility in advertising their goods and services a more reasonable restriction would be fifty (50) percent of the glass surface area of the window; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby directs staff to conduct the necessary public hearings for consideration of an amendment to the sign ordinance as described above; PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994. ,, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: p/ ;crsint APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK /x�CITY ATTORNEY January 20, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach Council January 25, 1994 STENNETT WELL STATUS REPORT Recommendation: Direct appropriate staff to continue to monitor well sites and track Department of oil and Gas (DOG) progress. Well #7 (6th & Cypress) Bulk heads and a trap door, as required, have been installed. As of this date no fencing has been installed; however, Mrs. Stennett has been agreeable to install fencing, and we have given her until January 24th. City scheduled installation will be on January 25th, if she fails to comply with our request. Mrs. Stennett will then be charged for the fencing, or the property will be liened. The oil which is seeping up has been vacuumed weekly and will continue until the problem is resolved. The DOG is proceeding with having the well capped. They have contacted Mrs. Stennett and she is agreeable to capping the well. However, to expedite the capping DOG is investigating appropriating funds, and arranging for Mrs. Stennett to make payments. The time frame for completing this task is uncertain at this time; however, an estimate may be available prior to the 1/25 meeting. Well #1 (City Yard) According to DOG, it is legal to release natural gas periodically under certain circumstances, but only with their approval, and only in limited amounts. They are investigating as to whether Stennett may release gas. The City Attorney is negotiating with Stennett for resolution regarding this well. Well #3 (500 block of 1st St..) Well #3 has not operated for several years, and is in non -operational condition. This well is seriously dilapidated, and the site is covered with weeds, and debris. Further, the ground is contaminated, and the Fire Department, therefore, has prohibited re -operation of this well without first soil decontamination. - 1 - (ovE2) 1 k The staff has requested DOG to require capping and soil decontamination of this well site. DOG has agreed to investigate. cc: Bruce Hesson, DOG Capt. ED Chesson, HB Fire Dept. Mike Flaherty, Public Works Superintendent - 2 - January 13, 1994 City Council Meeting January 25, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 94-1102 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT PERTAINING TO WALLS AND FENCES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 94-1102, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of January 11, 1994, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: Benz, Bowler ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Elaine Doerfli Ci Clerk Noted: -W— Steph n urrell, City Manager Me' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 94-1102 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT PERTAINING TO WALLS AND FENCES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on November 9, 1993 and January 11, 1994, to consider oral and written testimony in regard to the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend the text pertaining to fence and wall heights for possible changes and/or clarifications and made the following Findings: A. Existing requirements for wall and fence heights do not need to be changed; B. Amendments are only necessary to the general requirements of Section 1215 to clarify the types of materials for walls and fences that are acceptable, and the situation where chain link fencing is acceptable; C. The proposed amendments will cause a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualify for an environmental negative declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 1215, subsection (5) as follows (added text is underlined and deleted text overstriked), and to add a second and third exception (one already exists for oil projects): "Walls, or fences, including the visible surface of retaining walls, shall be constructed of, or treated with, an aesthetically pleasing material si,Qh ar. approved by the Planning Director, including, but not limited to, -earth terse spit— -aee masonry block designed and manufactured to be exposed (e.g. split -face, scored, textured, or striated); surface treated masonry (e.g. stucco or paint); wrought iron or simulated wrought iron; brick; wood; stucco -o —a• sifflila- mate- ial approved by the D, - nn i n; ,-e -t„r or paint.- Plain gray untreated block not designed or manufactured to be exposed and chain link fences are prohibited. Chain link fences with vinyl or wood 17 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1994, by following vote: 18 AYES: 19 NOES: ABSTAIN: 20 ABSENT: 2111 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of 22 Hermosa Beach, California 2311 ATTEST: 24 CITY CLERK 2511 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 26� _ . , CITY ATTORNEY 27 28 - 2 - p/perwall slats may be approved by the Planning Director in Commercial or Manufacturing Zones only. 1 Exception. Chain link fencing may be installed for 2 temporary periods around Christmas tree lots, pumpkin lots, or similar temporary uses, and any construction 3 project to meet the safety requirements of the Uniform Building Code for the period of construction, 4 or, may be installed around temporarily dangerous areas as determined by City Officials from Fire, 5 Police, Building and Safety or Planning Departments. 6 Exception. Permanent chain link fencing may be installed around schools, tennis courts, baseball 7 fields, parks, or other recreational facilities." 8 SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of 9 its final passage and adoption. 10 SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause 11 this ordinance to be published in the' Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and 12 circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 13 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and 14 adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and 15 shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City 16 Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 17 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1994, by following vote: 18 AYES: 19 NOES: ABSTAIN: 20 ABSENT: 2111 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of 22 Hermosa Beach, California 2311 ATTEST: 24 CITY CLERK 2511 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 26� _ . , CITY ATTORNEY 27 28 - 2 - p/perwall Im January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 CONSUMER PROTECTION ORDINANCE: CABLE TELEVISION OPERATORS Recommendation It is recommended by the Cable Television Advisory Board and staff that Council adopt the attached Consumer Protection Ordinance for cable television operators. Background The Cable Television Advisory Board has been in place since May, 1992. Their mission is to work on the proposed franchise renewal with MultiVision as well as to address other issues concerning the regulation of cable television in the City. City Council granted an extension of the franchise agreement with MultiVisioh through February, 1994 and the Board will be presenting Council with recommendations regarding the renewal as well as revisions in the cable operator ordinance as appropriate. The Board has spent considerable time reviewing current and proposed ordinances for cable television operators. As an approach, they elected to recommend two (2) ordinances for the regulation of cable operators: one (1) to establish consumer protection standards and one (1) to regulate franchise operations. The Board added a consumer protection ordinance as a means of further regulating and monitoring current and prospective cable operators and to make them accountable for the service they provide to our residents. At the January 11, 1994 meeting, Council requested that the Cable Television Advisory Board review the comments submitted by MultiVision and incorporate changes in the ordinance as appropriate. The Board listened to a presentation by MultiVision at their January 17, 1994 meeting and amended the recommended ordinance (Attachment A). Analysis Keeping mindful of the preliminary direction provided by Council, the Board approached the revisions to the ordinance by attempting to add clarity and consistency to the document without unduly compromising consumer standards. Council requested that 2b MultiVision provide the Board with information regarding any provisions that would result in a direct cost to the consumer as a result of the passage of this ordinance. The Board did not receive anything notable from MultiVision in that regard. CSG and Associates (who the City hired to work on franchise renewal) worked with the Board at the meeting to keep them apprised of State and Federal standards and to provide counsel on the requested revisions. They are satisfied that the recommended ordinance is a strong and workable one for the City and the operator. As noted in the previous item, The Board will be meeting with MultiVision prior to finalizing the second ordinance as it is particularly relevant to the renewal process and to our eventual agreement(s) with MultiVision and/or other prospective cable operators. If there are any additional difficulties with the consumer protection ordinance for MultiVision, these items can be aired in the context of negotiations. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1) Amend the attached ordinance 2) Request additional information Respectfully Submitted, Ma C ney As tant City Manager Concur: J Steven -Wh�urrell City Manager Concur: Charles S. Vose City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 1 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH 3 MUNICIPAL CODE BY ESTABLISHING LOCAL CABLE CONSUMER PROTECTION STANDARDS. 4 5 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach 6 has heretofore adopted rules and regulations governing the 7 award of franchises and the operation of Community Antenna 8 Television Systems within the City of Hermosa Beach; and 9 WHEREAS, the State Legislature, by Chapter 262, has 10added Article 3.5 to the Government Code of the State of 11 California commencing with Section 53054 entitled "Cable 12 Television and Video Provider Customer Service Information 13 Act" which was effective January 1, 1993; and 14 WHEREAS, the State Legislature, by Chapter 1198, has 15 amended the Government Code of the State of California to 16 add Article 4.5 entitled "The Video Customer Service Act," 17 commencing with Section 53088; and 18 WHEREAS, the Video Customer Service Act became 19 effective until on September 1, 1993; and 20 WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council by 21 this Ordinance to reaffirm and update the terms and 22 provisions of consumer protection. 23 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA 24 BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 25 SECTION 1: Chapter 7.5 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal 26 Code pertaining to Cable Television Systems is hereby 27 amended by adding Article II to read as follows: 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "ARTICLE II - CATV CONSUMER PROTECTION Sec. 7.5-24. TITLE This Article shall be known as and may be referred to as the City of Hermosa Beach CATV Consumer Protection Ordinance. Sec. 7.5-25. INTENTION. It is the intention of the City Council, by this Article, to enact a consumer protection ordinance applicable to CATV systems within the City of Hermosa Beach. To the extent any of the provisions of this Article are inconsistent with any Ordinances, Resolutions or Agreements, sometimes hereinafter called the "Franchise Documents," the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply. To the extent any of the terms and provisions of this Article are inconsistent with the California Cable Television and Video Provider Customer Service and Information Act (Government Code 53054, et seq.), the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply. The terms and provisions of the Video Customer Service Act which are inconsistent with the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply, but, otherwise, where the terms and provisions of this Article 'are consistent with the Video Customer Service Act, but provide additional protection, the terms and provisions of this Article.shall apply. Sec. 7.5-26. CABLE TELEVISION AND VIDEO PROVIDER CUSTOMER SERVICE AND INFORMATION ACT. No person shall violate the terms and provisions of the Cable Television 2 1 2 and Video Provider Customer Service And Information Act, 3 Government Code 53054, et seq. All CATV Franchisees 4 within the City shall comply with all of the terms and 5 provisions of said Act. In the event of the failure of 6 any Franchisee to distribute the Annual Notice required by 7 Section 53055.1 of the Government Code, the City Manager 8 shall give written notice thereof to said Franchisee to comply within sixty (60) days, and upon failure of said 9 10 Franchisee to so comply, a penalty in the sum of $500 for 11 each year in which the notice is not distributed shall be 12 imposed by the Director of Finance. The penalties shall 13 be due and owing immediately upon notice of its 14 disposition. Non-payment of the penalty shall be grounds for termination of said franchise. 15 16 The Annual Notice as used herein, and as required by 17 said Act, shall be given at least sixty (60) days after 18 the effective date of the Ordinance enacting this Section 19 and, thereafter, on or about the first day of January of each year. The Notice given to the City of Hermosa Beach 20 shall be delivered to the City Administrator and shall 21 include a verbatim copy of the customer service standards 22 established by each Franchisee within the City. 23 Sec. 7.5-27. VIDEO CUSTOMER SERVICE ACT. No person 24 shall violate the terms and provisions of the Video 25 Customer Service Act, Government Code 53088, et seq. In 26 the event any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, ,or 27 business located therin, including the City of Hermosa 28 Beach, should claim that a Franchisee, is not complying 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 with the terms and provisions of said Act, or any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, or business located therin, should have a dispute with said Franchisee under the provisions of said Act, written notice thereof may be filed with the City Clerk. A. Any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, or business located therin having a dispute with a Franchisee or having a complaint that the Franchisee is not complying with the terms and provisions of said Act shall reduce the complaint or dispute in writing before the City Clerk is required to act thereon. Upon receipt of said written notice, the City Clerk shall, within ten (10) days, make a tentative determination of whether the matter set forth in the notice is within the terms and provisions of said Act. B. If the City Clerk should determine that the matter set forth in said notice is not within the terms and provisions of said Act within said ten (10) days, said City Clerk shall return the written notice to the person providing the same with a written explanation of why the same is not covered under said Act. C. If the City Clerk determines that the notice appears to be under the terms and provisions of said Act, he or she shall give the Franchisee written notice of any alleged material breaches of the consumer service standards of said Act and allow the Franchisee at least thirty (30) days from receipt of the notice to remedy the specified breach. D. If, in the opinion of the City Manager, or his 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 duly authorized representative, said breach is material and not remedied within said thirty (30) days, said City Manager or representative shall give the Franchisee a ten- day prior written notice of the penalties assessed for said breach as provided in Section 53088.2(o) of the Government Code of the State of California. E. Pursuant to said Section 53088.2(o) and (p) of the Government Code, the City Manager, or his authorized representative, is hereby authorized to impose the penalties therein set forth on or after September 1, 1993. The penalties shall not exceed the amounts therein set forth and shall be assessed in accordance with the terms and provisions of Section 53088.2. In the event any Franchisee should fail to pay said penalty when assessed, on written notice to the Franchisee, the same may be grounds for the revocation of said franchise. However, any monetary penalty assessed under the provisions of this Section, shall be reduced dollar for dollar to the extent any liquidated damages or penalty provision of the Franchise Documents imposes a monetary obligation upon the Franchisee for customer service failures, and no other iZonetary damages may be imposed in such a case. F. Any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, or business located therin directly affected by any ruling or determination of the City Clerk or the City Manager or his representative may, by written notice filed within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice of the decision complained of, appeal said decision to the City Council. 5 1 2 The City Clerk shall thereafter schedule a public hearing 3 on said appeal before the City Council within sixty (60) 4 days of the receipt of said appeal. 5 Sec. 7.5-28 CATV CONSUMER -PROTECTION. In addition 6 to the provisions of any Franchise Documents pertaining to 7 consumer protection the following consumer protection 8 standards are adopted and, where inconsistent with the Franchise Documents, shall govern: 9 10 A. For the purpose of this Section the following 11 definitions shall apply: 1. "Company" shall mean the CATV Franchisee of 12 the City of Hermosa Beach. 13 2. "Customer Service Representative" shall mean 14 15 the representative of said company that is designated and trained to assist cable television customers with all 16 matters pertaining to the provision of service. 17 3. "Consumer or Customer" shall mean that person 18 or business to whom company provides CATV services within 19 the City of Hermosa Beach by authorized rental, sale or 20 subscription. 21 4. "Normal Business Hours" shall mean those 22 hours during which most similar businesses in the 23 community are open to serve customers. In all cases, 24 "normal business hours" must include some evening hours at 25 least one night per week and/or some weekend hours. 26 5. ."Normal Operating Conditions" shall mean 27 those service conditions which are within the control of 28 the cable operator. Those conditions which are not in 6 1 2 control of the cable operator include, but are not limited 3 to, natural disasters, civil disturbances, power outages, 4 telephone network outages, and severe or unusual weather 5 conditions. Those conditions which are ordinarily within 6 the control of the cable operator include, but are not 7 limited to, special promotions, pay-per-view events, rate 8 increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or upgrade of cable system. 9 10 6. "Service Interruption" or "Outage" shall mean 11 the loss of picture or sound on one or more cable channels. 12 7. "Systems" shall mean the CATV Franchisee of 13 the City of Hermosa Beach. 14 B. Each Franchisee of the City of Hermosa.Beach shall 15 comply with the following consumer standards: 16 1. Require that a Customer Service 17 Representative will be available to respond to customer's 18 or PEG channel programmer's telephone inquiries Monday 19 through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and on Saturday 20 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Holidays are excluded. The 21 cable company's customer service center shall be open 22 during normal business hours. The cable company shall 23 provide telephone availability to its subscribers twenty - 24 four (24) hours a day, seven days a week. After normal 25 business hours an answering service or an automated 26 response system must be provided. Inquiries received after 27 normal business hours must be responded to by a trained 28 company representative on the next business day. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Under normal operating conditions, telephone answering time by a customer service representative, including wait time and the time required to transfer the call, shall not exceed 30 seconds. The number of routine rings shall be limited to four or fewer. Under normal conditions customer callers shall receive a busy signal less than 3% of the time. This standard shall be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time measured on a quarterly basis and in accordance to a methodology proposed by cable company and approved by City. City shall have an absolute right, upon three (3) days written notice, to inspect any and all telephone response and monitoring information as necessary for City to assure that the cable company is meeting its requirements. 3. Under normal operating conditions, each of the following standards will be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time measured on an quarterly basis in accordance to methodology proposed by cable company and approved by City: (a) Standard installations will be performed within seven (7) business days after an order has been placed, excepting subscriber request(s) otherwise. "Standard" installations are up to 125 feet from the existing distribution system. (b) Excluding those situations reasonably beyond the control of the cable operator (which include natural disasters, civil disturbances, power outages, telephone network outages and sever or unusual weather 8 1 2 conditions), the cable operator will respond to service 3 interruptions, defined as three or more signal outages 4 effecting more than one channel in franchise area, 5 promptly and in no event later than 4 hours. The 6 franchisee shall be deemed to respond to an outage when 7 its representative arrives at the outage location, if 8 necessary, and begins to resolve the problem. Other 9 service problems will be responded to by the close of 1C business on the next working day of the cable operator. 11 (c) The in-home appointment window alternatives for installations and service calls shall not 12 13 be longer than four (4) hours in compliance with 14 California Civil Code Section 1722. The customer may choose the appointment window most convenient for them. 15 (d) If, at any time an installer or 16 technician is running late and will not arrive within the 17 prescribed window, an attempt to contact the customer will 18 be made and the appointment rescheduled as necessary at a 19 time which is convenient for the customer. 20 4. Cable company billing statements shall be 21 clear, concise and understandable: Bills will be fully 22 iltemized, with itemizations including, but not limited to, 23 basic and premium_ service charges and equipment charges 24 and bills will also clearly delineate all activity during 25 the billing period, including optional charges, rebates 26 and credits. Cable company shall consult with City on any 27 changes to company's statement and will consider City 28 suggestions for modifications. 9 1 2 5. No customer shall have their service 3 disconnected unless there has been compliance with the 4 provisions of Government Code 53058, et seq. 5 6. In ninety percent (90%) of cases, refund 6 checks will be issued within thirty (30) days; but, in no 7 event, later than forty-five (45) days following the 8 resolution of the request and the return of the equipment 9 supplied by the cable company if service is terminated. 10 7. Cable company will cooperate with City's 11 annual customer service and local programming survey. 8. Customers will be notified a minimum of 12 thirty (30) days in advance of any rate or channel 13 realignment change changes in products and services 14 offered, billing and complaint procedures and service 15 maintenance policies, as provided in Government Code 16 53088.2(h). 17 9. Cable company shall provide City with a 18 quarterly report on the number of service interruptions 19 longer than thirty (30) minutes (on subscriber and 20 institutional networks); service requests, complaints and 21 service calls; their breakdown and resolution and 22 gomparison on a year-to-date and previous quarter/last- 23 year basis. The.report shall be in a format proposed by 24 cable company and approved by the City. 25 10. Customers and local PEG channel programmers 26 shall be afforded access to company's management structure 27 including the System Customer Service Manager and System 28 General Manager. System management staff will respond in 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 good faith to PEG channel programmers and customer verbal complaints or inquiries within one (1) working day of the initial request. System management staff will respond in writing to PEG channel programmers and customer written complaints or inquiries within five (5) working days of the initial request. Customers will, at least annually, be informed of this option via written notice. 11. Cable company shall file all general customer communications with the City. Company's filing with City shall at least be concurrent with its initial distribution to customers. General customer communications include, but are not limited to, marketing materials, notice of any changes in rates, programming services or channel positions and annual notification information required under state law. 12. Cable company will prepare and submit to the City a policy with respect to procedures for access to subscriber's property. 13. If the cable company personnel does not arrive for installation or service calls within a designated four-hour time frame agreed to by the consumer, the consumer may request and is entitled to one month's worth credit of the .subscriber's basic service tier bill. If the cable company fails to provide such credit, and the request was made by the consumer within forty-five (45) days of the .missed appointment, the City may direct the cable company to issue the credit. The acceptance of the above service credit shall not prohibit the consumer from 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 seeking additional remedies pursuant to applicable state law. 14. If the cable company does not mail a check for a refund (including applicable interest) to any consumer disconnecting service with an outstanding credit within the next billing cycle or thirty days, whichever is earlier, the consumer may request and is entitled to receive a $10.00 payment. In addition to the initial refund (and applicable interest) due, if the cable company fails to provide the $10.00 payment and the request was made by the consumer within forty-five (45) days after failure to receive the refund, the City may direct the cable company to provide the $10.00 payment as well as any outstanding refund (and applicable interest) due. 15. If the cable company cannot perform standard installations, defined as those located up to 125 feet from the existing distribution system, within seven (7) calendar days of request by a consumer, the consumer may request and is entitled to receive a $10.00 credit. If the cable company fails to provide the $10.00 credit and the request was made by the consumer within forty-five (45) days of the installation request, the City may direct the cable company to issue the credit. 16. The cable company shall provide an automatic credit to all consumers where there is an outage of all channels for a period of twenty-four (24) consecutive hours or more which affects the entire Franchise area, regardless of the cause of the outage. The credit for such 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 an outage shall equal, at a minimum, the value of one thirtieth of each customer's monthly bill for, the first 24 -consecutive -hour period and prorated for each additional four-hour period or portion thereof that the outage continues. The cable company shall provide an automatic credit to all affected consumers when there is an outage of any premium service for a period of twenty- five (25) consecutive hours or more which affects the entire Franchise area, regardless of the cause of the outage. The credit shall equal, at a minimum, the value of one -thirtieth of each consumer's monthly bill for the first 24 -consecutive -hour period and prorated for each additional four-hour period or portion thereof that the outage continues. 17. Upon request of the cable consumer, the cable company shall provide a credit to a consumer whenever an outage or outages of four or more hours in a twenty-four hour period has ocurred on any of the channels received by a consumer as part of their cable television service. The credit shall be prorated for the outages of four hours or greater duration occurring in a 24-hour period. In the event that a premium channel is affected by the outage, the credit shall prorated based on consumer's monthly premium rate for each outage of four hours or greater duration occurring in a 24-hour period. 18. .consumers will be given at least thirty (30) days notice of any scrambling or de -scrambling of a channel(s), or rate changes that are within the company's 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 control. 19. The cable company shall offer consumers the option to receive an A/B switch at the time of initial cable service installation and shall provide consumers with written information as to how to use such a switch. The cable company may charge a reasonable price for said switch. Upon consumer request, the cable company shall provide an A/B switch after the initial installation of cable service. If the consumer requests installation of such a switch (to receive broadcast television without cable hookup), the cable company may charge reasonable fees for such installation and equipment. 20. If, in the opinion of the City Manager, there has been a material violation of the terms and provisions of this Section which has not been remedied despite notices to do so or the assessment of fees and fines, a written notice may be given to the Franchisee setting forth in detail the nature of the violation and proceedings commenced as of the violation and proceedings commenced as provided in the Franchise Agreement Documents for the revocation of said Franchise. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and. adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1994. ATTEST: day of President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "ARTICLE II - CATV CONSUMER PROTECTION Sec. 7.5-24. TITLE. This Article shall be known as and may be referred to as the City of Hermosa Beach CATV Consumer Protection Ordinance. Sec. 7.5-25. INTENTION. It is the intention of the City Council, by this Article, to enact a consumer protection ordinance applicable to CATV systems within the City of Hermosa Beach. To the extent any of the provisions of this Article are inconsistent with any Ordinances, Resolutions or Agreements, sometimes hereinafter called the "Franchise Documents," the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply. Ife- the extent any ef the terms and ef this Artiele are ,ineensisceirt--with the ealifernia Gable (Gevernment eede 53954, et seq.), the terms and previslens ef this Artiele shall apply. The terms and provisions of the Video Customer Service and Information Act (Government Code 53054, et sea.) which are inconsistent with the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply, but, otherwise, where the terms and provisions of this Article are consistent with the Video Customer Service Act, but provide additional protection, the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply. Sec. 7.5-26. CABLE TELEVISION AND VIDEO PROVIDER CUSTOMER SERVICE AND INFORMATION ACT. No person shall z SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2 b 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ESTABLISHING LOCAL CABLE CONSUMER PROTECTION STANDARDS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach has heretofore adopted rules and regulations governing the award of franchises and the operation of Community Antenna Television Systems within the City of Hermosa Beach; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature, by Chapter 262, has added Article 3.5 to the Government Code of the State of California commencing with Section 53054 entitled "Cable Television and Video Provider Customer Service Information Act" which was effective January 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature, by Chapter 1198, has amended the Government Code of the State of California to add Article 4.5 entitled "The Video Customer Service Act," commencing with Section 53088; and WHEREAS, the Video Customer Service Act became effective until on September 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council by this Ordinance to reaffirm and update the terms and provisions of consumer protection. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Chapter 7.5 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to Cable Television Systems is hereby amended by adding Article II to read as follows: - .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ESTABLISHING LOCAL CABLE CONSUMER PROTECTION STANDARDS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach has heretofore adopted rules and regulations governing the award of franchises and the operation of Community Antenna Television Systems within the City of Hermosa Beach; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature, by Chapter 262, has added Article 3.5 to the Government Code of the State of California commencing with Section 53054 entitled "Cable Television and Video Provider Customer Service Information Act" which was effective January 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature, by Chapter 1198, has amended the Government Code of the State of California to add Article 4.5 entitled "The Video Customer Service Act," commencing with Section 53088; and WHEREAS, the Video Customer Service Act became effective until on September 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council by this Ordinance to reaffirm and update the terms and provisions of consumer protection. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Chapter 7.5 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to Cable Television Systems is hereby amended by adding Article II to read as follows: - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "ARTICLE II - CATV CONSUMER PROTECTION Sec. 7.5-24. TITLE. This Article shall be known as and may be referred to as the City of Hermosa Beach CATV Consumer Protection Ordinance. Sec. 7.5-25. INTENTION. It is the intention of the City Council, by this Article, to enact a consumer protection ordinance applicable to CATV systems within the City of Hermosa Beach. To the extent any of the provisions of this Article are inconsistent with any Ordinances, Resolutions or Agreements, sometimes hereinafter called the "Franchise Documents," the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply. To the extent any of the terms and provisions of this Article are inconsistent with the California Cable Television and Video Provider Customer Service and Information Act (Government Code 53054, et seq.), the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply. The terms and provisions of the Video Customer Service Act which are inconsistent with the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply, but, otherwise, where the terms and provisions of this Article are consistent with the Video Customer Service Act, but provide additional protection, the terms and provisions of this Article shall apply. Sec. 7.5-26. CABLE TELEVISION AND VIDEO PROVIDER CUSTOMER SERVICE AND INFORMATION ACT. No person shall violate the terms and provisions of the Cable Television 2 e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and Video Provider. Customer Service And Information Act, Government Code 53054, et seq. All CATV Franchisees within the City shall comply with all of the terms and provisions of said Act. In the event of the failure of any Franchisee to distribute the Annual Notice required by Section 53055.1 of the Government Code, the City Manager shall give written notice thereof to said Franchisee to comply within sixty (60) days, and upon failure of said Franchisee to so comply, a penalty in the sum of $500 for each year in which the notice is not distributed shall be imposed by the Director of Finance. The penalties shall be due and owing immediately upon notice of its disposition. Non-payment of the penalty shall be grounds for termination of said franchise. The Annual Notice as used herein, and as required by said Act, shall be given at least sixty (60) days after the effective date of the Ordinance enacting this Section and, thereafter, on or about the first day of January of each year. The Notice given to the City of Hermosa Beach shall be delivered to the City Administrator and shall include a verbatim copy of the customer service standards established by each Franchisee within the City. Sec. 7.5-27. VIDEO CUSTOMER SERVICE ACT. No person shall violate the terms and provisions of the Video Customer Service Act, Government Code 53088, et seq. In the event any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, or business located therin, including the City of Hermosa Beach, should claim that a Franchisee, is not complying 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 with the terms and provisions of said Act, or any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, or business located therin, should have a dispute with said Franchisee under the provisions of said Act, written notice thereof may be filed with the City Clerk. A. Any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, or business located therin having a dispute with a Franchisee or having a complaint that the Franchisee is not complying with the terms and provisions of said Act shall reduce the complaint or dispute in writing before the City Clerk is required to act thereon. Upon receipt of said written notice, the City Clerk shall, within ten (10) days, make a tentative determination of whether the matter set forth in the notice is within the terms and provisions of said Act. B. If the City Clerk should determine that the matter set forth in said notice is not within the terms and provisions of said Act within said ten (10) days, said City Clerk shall return the written notice to the person providing the same with a written explanation of why the same is not covered under said Act. C. If the City Clerk determines that the notice appears to be under the terms and provisions of said Act, he or she shall give the Franchisee written notice of any alleged material breaches of the consumer service - standards of said Act and allow the Franchisee at least thirty (30) days from receipt of the notice to remedy the - specified breach. D. If, in the opinion of the City Manager, or his 4 - 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 duly authorized representative, said breach is material and not remedied within said thirty (30) days, said City Manager or representative shall give the Franchisee a ten- day prior written notice of the penalties assessed for said breach as provided in Section 53088.2(o) of the Government Code of the State of California. E. Pursuant to said Section 53088.2(o) and (p) of the Government Code, the City Manager, or his authorized representative, is hereby authorized to impose the penalties therein set forth on or after September 1, 1993. The penalties shall not exceed the amounts therein set forth and shall be assessed in accordance with the teras and provisions of Section 53088.2. In the event any Franchisee should fail to pay said penalty when assessed, on written notice to the Franchisee, the same may be grounds for the revocation of said franchise. However, any monetary penalty assessed under the provisions of this Section, shall be reduced dollar for dollar to the extent any liquidated damages or penalty provision of the Franchise Documents imposes a monetary obligation upon the Franchisee for customer service failures, and no other monetary damages may be imposed in such a case. F. Any resident of the City of Hermosa Beach, or business located therin directly affected by any ruling or determination of the City Clerk or the City Manager or his representative may, by written notice filed within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice of the decision complained of, appeal said decision to the City Council. 5 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The City Clerk shall thereafter schedule a public hearing on said appeal before the City Council within sixty (60) days of the receipt of said appeal. Sec. 7.5-28 CATV CONSUMER PROTECTION. In addition to the provisions of any Franchise Documents pertaining to consumer protection the following consumer protection standards are adopted and, where inconsistent with the Franchise Documents, shall govern: A. For the purpose of this Section the following definitions shall apply: 1. "Company" shall mean the CATV Franchisee of the City of Hermosa Beach. 2. "Customer Service Representative" shall mean the representative of said company that is designated and trained to assist cable television customers with all matters pertaining to the provision of service. 3. "Consumer or Customer" shall mean that person or business to whom company provides CATV services within the City of Hermosa Beach by authorized rental, sale or subscription. 4. "Normal Business Hours" shall mean those hours during which most similar businesses in the community are open to - serve customers. In all cases, "normal business hours" must include some evening hours at least one night per week and/or some weekend hours. 5. "Normal Operating Conditions" shall mean those service conditions which are within the control of the cable operator. Those conditions which are not in C-1 V 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 control of the cable operator include, but are not limited to, natural disasters, civil disturbances, power outages, telephone network outages, and severe or unusual weather conditions. Those conditions which are ordinarily within the control of the cable operator include, but are not limited to, special promotions, pay-per-view events, rate increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or upgrade of cable system. 6. "Service Interruption" or "Outage" shall mean the loss of picture or sound on one or more cable channels. 7. "Systems" shall mean the CATV Franchisee of the City of Hermosa Beach. B. Each Franchisee of the City of Hermosa Beach shall comply with the following consumer standards: 1. Require that a Customer Service Representative will be available to respond to customer's or PEG channel programmer's telephone inquiries Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Holidays are excluded. The cable company's customer service center shall be open during normal business hours. The cable company shall provide telephone availability to its subscribers twenty- four (24) hours a day, seven days a week. After normal business hours an answering service or an autcmated response system must be provided. Inquiries received after normal business hours must be responded to by a trained company representative on the next business day. 7 n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Under normal operating conditions, telephone answering time by a customer service representative, including wait time and the time required to transfer the call, shall not exceed 30 seconds. The number of routine rings shall be limited to four or fewer. Under normal conditions customer callers shall receive a busy signal less than 3% of the time. This standard shall be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time measured on a quarterly basis and in accordance to a methodology proposed by cable company and approved by City. City shall have an absolute right, upon three (3) days written notice, to inspect any and all telephone response and monitoring information as necessary for City to assure that the cable company is meeting its requirements. 3. Under normal operating conditions, each of the following standards will be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time measured on an quarterly basis in accordance to methodology proposed by cable company and approved by City: (a) Standard installations will be performed within seven (7) business days after an order has been placed, excepting subscriber request(s) otherwise. "Standard" installations are up to 125 feet from the existing distribution system. (b) Excluding those situations reasonably beyond the control of the cable operator (which include natural disasters, civil disturbances, power outages, telephone network outages and sever or unusual weather 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 conditions), the cable operator will respond to service interruptions, defined as three or more signal outages effecting more than one channel in franchise area, promptly and in no event later than 4 hours. The franchisee shall be deemed to respond to an outage when its representative arrives at the outage location, if necessary, and begins to resolve the problem. Other service problems will be responded to by the close of business on the next working day of the cable operator. (c) The in-home appointment window alternatives for installations and service calls shall not be longer than four (4) hours in compliance with California Civil Code Section 1722. The customer may choose the appointment window most convenient for them. (d) If, at any time an installer or technician is running late and will not arrive within the prescribed window, an attempt to contact the customer will be made and the appointment rescheduled as necessary at a time which is convenient for the customer. 4. Cable company billing statements shall be clear, concise and understandable: Bills will be fully itemized, with itemizations including, but not limited to, basic and premium service charges and equipment charges and bills will also clearly delineate all activity during the billing period, including optional charges, rebates and credits. Cable company shall consult with City on any changes to company's statement and will consider City suggestions for modifications. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. No customer shall have their service disconnected unless there has been com(q. with the provisions of Government Code -5305x8-, et s6. In ninety percent (90%) , refund checks will be issued within thirty (30) days; but, in no event, later than forty-five (45) days following the resolution of the request and the return of the equipment supplied by the cable company if service is terminated. 7. Cable company will cooperate with City's annual customer service and local programming survey. 8. Customers will be notified a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance of any rate or channel realignment change changes in products and services offered, billing and complaint procedures and service maintenance policies, as provided in Government Code 53088.2(h). 9. Cable company shall provide City with a quarterly report on the number of service interruptions longer than thirty (30) minutes (on subscriber and institutional networks); service requests, complaints and service calls; their breakdown and resolution and comparison on a year-to-date and previous quarter/last- year basis. The report shall be in a format proposed by cable company and approved by the City. 10. Customers and local PEG channel programmers shall be afforded access to company's management structure including the System Customer Service Manager and System General Manager. System management staff will respond in 10 U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 good faith to PEG channel programmers and customer verbal complaints or inquiries within one (1) working day of the initial request. System management staff will respond in writing to PEG channel programmers and customer written complaints or inquiries within five (5) working days of the initial request. Customers will, at least annually, be informed of this option via written notice. 11. Cable company shall file all general customer communications with the City. Company's filing with City shall at least be concurrent with its initial distribution to customers. General customer communications include, but are not limited to, marketing materials, notice of any changes in rates, programming services or channel positions and annual notification information required under state law. 12. Cable company will prepare and submit to the City a policy with respect to procedures for access to subscriber's property. �13. If the cable company personnel does not arrive for installation or service calls within a designated four-hour time frame agreed to by the consumer, the consumer may request and is entitled to one month's worth credit of the subscriber's basic service tier bill. If the cable company fails to provide such credit, and the request was made by the consumer within forty-five (45) ( IN 1v9 i;r1 N6 ) days" of the missed appointment, the City may direcl� the cable company to issue the credit. The acceptance of the above -service credit shall not prohibit the consumer from 11 N ;.n 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 seeking additional remedies pursuant to applicable state law. 14. If the cable company does not mail a check for a refund (including applicable interest) to any consumer disconnecting service with an outstanding credit within the next billing cycle or thirty days, whichever is earlier, the consumer may request and is entitled to receive a $10.00 payment. In addition to the initial refund (and applicable interest) due, if the cable company fails to provide the $10.00 payment and the request was made by the consumer within forty-five (45) days after failure to receive the refund, the City may direct the cable company to provide the $10.00 payment as well as any outstanding refund (and applicable interest) due. 15. If the cable company cannot perform standard installations, defined as those located up to 125 feet from the existing distribution system, within seven (7) calendar days of request by a consumer, the consumer may request and is entitled to receive a $10.00 credit. If the cable company fails to provide the $10.00 credit and /W A 1TI.IV6 the request was made by the consumer within forty-five (45) days of the installation request, the City may direct the cable company to issue the credit. 16. The cable company shall provide an automatic credit to all consumers where there is an outage of all channels for a period of twenty-four (24) consec•Itive hours or more which affects the entire Franchise area, regardless of the cause of the outage. The credit for such 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 an outage shall equal, at a minimum, the value of one thirtieth of each customer's monthly bill for the first 24 -consecutive -hour period and prorated for each additional four-hour period or portion thereof that the outage continues. The cable company shall provide an automatic credit to all affected consumers when there is an outage of any premium service for a period of twenty- five (25) consecutive hours or more which affects. the entire Franchise area, regardless of the cause of the outage. The credit shall equal, at a minimum, the value .17 P/'1C1g1"4 of one -thirtieth of each consumer's monthly bill for the first 24 -consecutive -hour period and prorated for each additional four-hour period or portion thereof that the outage continues. 17. Upon request of the cable consumer, the cable company shall provide a credit to a consumer whenever an outage or outages of four or more hours in a twenty-four hour period has ocurred on any of the channels received by a consumer as part of their cable television service. The credit shall be prorated for the outages of four hours or greater duration occurring in a 24-hour period. In the event that a premium channel is affected by the outage, the credit shall prorated based on consumer's monthly premium rate for each outage of four hours or greater duration occurring in a 24-hour period. 18. Consumers will be given at least thirty (30) days notice of any scrambling or de -scrambling of a channel(s), or rate changes that are within the company's 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 control. 19. The cable company shall offer consumers the option to receive an A/B switch at the time of initial cable service installation and shall provide consumers with written information as to how to use such a switch. The cable company may charge a reasonable price for said switch. Upon consumer request, the cable company shall provide an A/B switch after the initial installation of cable service. If the consumer requests installation of such a switch (to receive broadcast television without cable hookup), the cable company may charge reasonable fees for such installation and equipment. 20. If, in the opinion of the City Manager, there has been a material violation of the terms and provisions of this Section which has not been remedied despite notices do so or the assessment of fees and fines, a 2 i'9 ,,written notice may be given to the Franchisee setting forth in detail the nature of the violation and proceedings commenced as of the violation and proceedings commenced as provided in the Franchise Agreement Documents for the revocation of said Franchise. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage � M and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 1C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , 1994. 15 day of President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , City Clerk , City Attorney .•.�.a w,we.r.wwaa�an'vreoaww..n�.srrurammefiM54Y[pKyKYeMWdlVeiA�iliYNN u�.b c rak lwiux+l W..n. C.r.K..�9"x.r��Me i�l.Yct W.�Wsn•L ]iCt,lne �..» ')fY.�L-nTIWW'.i1 .+�zMSLI1CbdYrk:.fYA+KAG'ia:N�� JAM 25 '94 17;05 COOPER, WHITE&COOPER 415 4335530 N P. 2 A 1ARYwT"A1P INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS TILECOPtEI (415) 433.5530 TIL Ix 161877 SCOOP LAW OFRCES OF COOPER,WHITE & COOPER 101 CALIFORNIA SM12T SEV8MINTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 9411L (415) 433-1900 January 25, 1994 Charles S. Vose Oliver, Barr 8 Vose 281 S. Figueroa street, Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 CONTRA CWTA OFFICR 1133 N CALIFORNIA BLVD WALNUT CRERK CALIFORNIA 94594 (510) 935-0700 Ret MultiVision Cable TV/Normosa Beach Franchise Renewal Dear Mr. Vose: We received your letter of December 14, 1993 in further response to Multivision's profound and acute concerns about the City's use of Scott Tollefsen, General Counsel (chief legal officer) and Vice President of KultiVision's competitor DirecTV and its parent company Hughes Communications, as the City's lead negotiator on the Cable Advisory Board which is developing the terms and conditions of MultiVision's Hermosa Beach cable television franchise renewal. We continue to believe that a person in Mr. Tollefsen's position is disqualified from serving in this official capacity for the City to negotiate the recommended cable television franchise terms and conditions, which will apply to MultiVision but not to his own employer DirecTV which is a competitor of Kultivision's. Under its franchise, Multivision will be obligated to pay cable franchise fees and utility taxes to the City, may likely have funding and service obligations for cable access channel facilities, may be required to provide free service connections to schools and other public buildings, and may be subject to vhatever other franchise costs, regulations and obligations may be negotiated or otherwise apply to Multivision. DirecTV, as a direct broadcast satellite (OBs) provider of much of the very same television programming as that offered by KultiVision, will not be subject to any of these obligations which DirecTV's executive is helping to develop. I also wish to make it clear for the record that the state Pair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) has specifically Wt made any determination or decision as to whether a conflict of interest exists which disqualifies DirecTV's Vice President and General Counsel from serving on the City's Cable Advisory Board and as lead negotiator of the franchise renewal terms. When we met with you in the City's offices in early December, 1993 to discuss this matter, after you proposed the FPPC be consulted, we suggested that their written opinion be obtained in order to resolve our disagreement as to whether a conflict of interest Charles s. Vose January 25, 1994 Page 2 exists. You rejected that proposal on the basis that obtaining the FPPcfs written opinion would take too long. You offered to call the FPPC for an oral review, and we indicated the desire to participate jointly in that discussion given the obvious limitations and problems we discussed which are inherent with such an oral inquiry. According to your December 14 letter, you then independently called the FPPC office on the phone, had a discussion with an unnamed legal staff member, and aro reporting back that if Kr. Tollefeen,s emploxer could receive an economic benefit over $2500000 in relation to his Cable Advisory Board position for the City, a conflict of interest may exist. However, it does not appear that the FPPC has even attempted to determine whether this test has been satisfied. As you know, informal advice such as may be obtained by telephone is not determinative or binding on any party, does not represent an FPPC decision, and does not provide the requesting party with any criminal or civil immunity from liability (see 2 Cal. Admin. Code 518329(c)(3)), because the factual information in an informal oral conversation is inherently not subject to adequate definition. Therefore, despite the impression created by your December 14 letter and notwithstanding any contrary report to City Council, the FPPC has not made any determination or decision on this matter. In any event, even using your proposed test, the conflict of interest does exist. To follow up on the discussion in your letter concerning the possible $350,000 test for whether a conflict of interest exists under FPPC regulations, although you did not cite to any statute or regulation, we believe you must have intended to refer to FPPC Regulations Section 18702.2. Assuming that this is the applicable test (although the regulation contains others with much lower dollar thresholds), we believe it is easily foreseeable that this test will be met as a result of DirecWts Vice President and General Counsel negotiating with MultiVision to determine the recommended franchise renewal terms and conditions. Our concern is the potential for franchise terms which are even incrementally more burdensome to Multivision as the franchised cable operator, compared to DirecTV which will not be subject to such franchise terms and local regulations. This can have a significant financial impact on KultiVision and/or benefit to DirecTV. For example, of the roughly 7,500 cable subscribers served by MultiVision in Hermosa Beach, suppose that DirecTV were able to attract only an incremental two percent (2t) of such JAN 25 '94 05:20PM COOPER,WHITE,COOPER S.F. P.i Charles s. Vose January 25, 1994 Page 3 subscribers from MultiVision, due to the higher costs or added reporting and service requirements resulting tram negotiated franchise terms and conditions. using even the lower end of common current industry valuations of $2,000 in investment per subscriber, the asset loss to MultiVision and asset gain for DirecTV would be $300,000 (24 X 7,500 subscribers X $2000 = $300,000). The full potential -for barn to MultiVisiori and benefit to DirecTV is actually many times greater than this: Subscriber "churn" or turnover rates for cable television (the number of cable subscribers who terminate cable service each year, and must be replaced even to maintain zero percent growth in subscribers) commonly approach 30% to 35% per year. Therefore even incremental differences in cable franchise terms and conditions - - matters only of modest degree way easily translate into a competitive advantage and asset benefit for DirecTV very substantially in excess of $250,000. On this basis we believe that DirecTV's general Counsel and Vice president should be disqualified as serving as lead franchise negotiator and on the City's Cable Advisory Board. In this connection, please note that DirecTV is competitive with MultiVision not merely in the abstract sense that it too will sell and deliver multi -channel television programming services and signals to the home, but in the very direct sense that it offers a significant number of the exact same program channels and services as MultiVision. For example, DirecTV is reportedly under contract to offer The Disney Channel, Super$tation TBS, The Learning Channel, CNN, Discovery Channel, 'USA Network, Turner Network TV (TNT),,Et Entertainment TV, The Weather Channel and other channels which are already part of Multivision's programming offerings in Hermosa Beach. These programs were made available to DireeTv lairgely through the recognition given by the U.S. Congress in the 1992 Cable Act to the fact that DBS providore are indeed competitive with cable television (see 47 MS. Code $522(12), 5.548, and FCC Rules 576.1000 21 M.) Indeed, birecTV's own President Eddy Hartanstein proclaimed to The New Bork Times .that in competing with cable television providers, "We like our odds; we believe we are delivering a revolution in the way entertainment and information is distributed* (see attached New York Times article, 11/21/93). We continue to fail to understand your and the CityFs refusal to acknowledge that DirecTV is a cospetitor-of MultiVision -- which does not wish its competitor's general counsel to act in an official capacity leadinq the City•s negotiations with MultiVision on cable franchise terms and regulations. JAN 25 '94 17:07 COOPER,WHITE&COOPER 415 4335530 P. 5 Charles S. Vose January 25, 1994 Page 4 MultiVision has intended to be cooperative and gracious in addressing the issue of the DirecTV conflict of interest. 1 personally contacted Mr. Tollefsen at his request by telephone last November to discuss the latter with him and urged his careful consideration of it. I then wrote a detailed letter to Mr. Tollefsen to give his the opportunity to reflect on it in detail, in the hope that he would be persuaded of our position without the need to bring it before the City or involve any formal action. We further informally reviewed the matter with the Acting City Manager and you as the City Attorney, again without success, and you have invited us to bring the matter before the City Council. Therefore we are providing copies of this letter to the members of the City Council, as well as to the Acting City Manager and to Mr. Tollefeen. I wish to emphasize again that we do not accuse Mr. Tollefeen personally of any improper conduct or motives. We simply believe that there is an inherent, incurable positional conflict of interest in DireeTV's General Counsel acting as leader for the Cable Advisory Board in negotiating MultiVision's franchise renewal terms. We believe it is contrary to good Iudgment as well as to the law, to force Multivision to negotiate ts fundamental contract with the City at the hands of the chief legal officer and senior executive of a direct competitor which will not be burdened by any franchise terms or regulations. we believe the entire process will be tainted if we go forward in this fashion. We ask once more that the City review this matter and recognize the conflict-of-interest disqualification, based on the information above and as previously discussed with you and other city representatives. I note again that the purpose of the municipal conflict of interest rule is to address not only actual impropriety, but even the appearance of it, so there is0 possibility of personal influence, direct or indirect ( n , 1Q3 Cal-App.3d 191 (1980)). A conflict of interest is barred even if the person in question received and followed contrary advice from the City Attorney, and even if there was no actual impropriety and the City actually benefitted, because of the public policy of strict enforcement of these conflict of interest rules (see Thama= v. Call, 38 Ca1.3d 633 (1980), a case in which this firm coincidentally represented the prevailing plaintiff). In the interest of moving forward together with the City on franchise renewal disaugions, as we have consistently demonstrated since we initiated discussions two years ago, MultiVision is willing to participate in a joint consultation or request for a formal written opinion from the FPPC if you would find this helpful, although we do not believe it is necessary and JAN 25 '94 17:08 COOPER,WHITE&COOPER 415 4335530 P. 6 Charles S. Vose January 25, 1994 Page 5 may not even be dispositive. we believe the most expeditious and proper resolution is for the City to designate another party to represent the City in our franchise renewal negotiations. In any event we are willing and ready to resume negotiations with City representatives to review and conclude the terms of franchise renewal, without prejudice to and with full reservation of all rights and remedies on multivision's part concerning the DirecTV conflict of interest. We are ready and willing to move the renewal process forward as soon as possible. We look forward to your and the City's response to the foregoing considerations. Please let us know how the city wishes to proceed. Sincerely yours, W Walter W. Hansell WWH:gr 65755.1 cc: Members of the City Council Mary C. Rooney Scott B. Tollefeen Donald R. Granger, MultiVision WUMEMMONEY/ MNSONAL FINANCE i-OIANGBCOE MY Q % - USINESS. o 4MA Sal u+ rh v1g ISO 9 5 �af, f, s3 p 7 o 4MA Sal u+ rh v1g ISO 9 5 �af, f, s3 p SATEI.LrrE: � _Pgns New Era in TV c...wwaf lm.t eft 11"a Wokam* MOR .�. �..1...,ww� .•" w. Iz reara.ara .aw.wrwlr. • •Mr Md".lwa.nlsarowh p�.wrs.�wl.w �.r'l'► aJ"las sion- -Bm 1l" wj.e"• aloes aal"YYw raswnwar"irll walLa"i- :!==0 ra �i .�+ru wgawawwrldwlwwar :..ra wr"w lwwa � went Lr .- r•�s a N/rl r.ir .a� pylr a 1.. aMf"i les U" jar vin swear musave ownswaft �>. p"i"ll ea. Aar ~ iA -�lwwwl M_SWll ON � p•JAiOgaaa 1~101F aalr . r e wbw e m Abd~ pw on fta pawf ■ 7R Win 04 OW mambo amm afarrwdw1w11.1lLarwt -- awrM�wtOrM/r��• ... ae,�.slrrw 1w� waAw ••r• ~ obow, of a.a-1r Jaewwls lalwlwr r mld*~ :' 6anW1 m 1wMrwoolO olw- dra �•r+ QIYwd w"� dew a/M""1" .::. -0 '1 w•MYlwf ~ miss, . �.11wft 1b= - as mob, i t Led Fe wome%L�Oow/w. �_-r� � widwYws is, Oak Ywwrj. is a.aumw . some .. s"Ilq"ara.YyawNn.aew ��"rO�rr� •�.Di�arwwrs mama. "LLu�YOYirrtOilrlM ;�-, p.wlww.�wOwra�rl d ala Lw.fa- tees%! •"tires" aa& r Y - .w d w ... •.iwrlmmbw i'.w.wwtA a Wawwwv of W Osis. as, • Swam MYIi alit tilt es, going eawh a tai- - Moss- iMM dwluti Omni an so M dEmet , ONO as wild aiM n..rllr ww4 aM aw0r • "Ramm"Kab i"aaaw.wp '� d wwr tar fwri � cess" -�.w�s� La•awb .wrtiel Lr wr_ � f0 awirw alrrea. C>1 1"ww"-i"wy limb wiw at - COME am bombs mak� ION 2416 �7apMna ll�aa wl.wiUre• wean •fw"w..- e. r rn sr-nll" �wwrsw4�r M des Ion ria 1n.Awi r w• •rsa lm.wr d aMw �i..la Mw♦wM�iwl�.aa� wwYwMww"srlwur'Itl` ■oo"" IIripm US lwsoa- aawit•w YraM<gkwmm" fwVAn wsr.lio.oll.t"a W ion Hrwwd b - §w A- Amp.- ad INS ANNK* !r! Lwraw"wataarlMf"na f��.elea+llr� Olwa"a�aea MwaawR w lislow" an vip- er as awes Y �r illnawae�M-. t ra"rnl" w awl w Obl.l straw aorl" ww crew" in lwraaf.w.■�wlrsawri pates. aan.wi fl. Mn- arl t7"�1 w wtl "."roses" artwo"wOww 1rr11Y �a lai"wL M wlil► L• Ywo Mr. Yww6"amuiwl.r Maui M bWGRvdl% lrw 1pil. WINa INNlWwtslmdw a a W eO�ls M�s- ae�rwiwwys "thaw w:F Oftw.al r"Warlwkwaftlw monsamom SIMMONS WLarMYYwwh.wlwwU&M lL4*umam wlwwwlmlr. I dmn as,. Lire. Al low" s,1 es, ww.l IMPW "d as, Sw.a.• wl. pwrr".lal dwwr- w `"mesa w, "A" Wws r•ir .ei��lf►mo al bdm" "1s wifl"t�w y".i� .w s111""L..."gra �" rr ■w�id!.!gL tel' iia* air b"w acres w sow, Lewr.. west for ares wnw rwrdLLrt.rJs"1"� 7 arrt we grt a 1M nest' �w • wwu11� mum 1w"wG acres MUD v wa. E lr"" bosom Mumma" mew ZZ" 64~ La Ll.w.4 "w; e■ wadft arrwllwwl"awiwM Mr nab sposes J.ww+eam s" w.iw.Mwwashs.ra oiala Wa'I"owasollowma _arw•wb a"wrls a w V4 ar Jmillow- tMwI Ise IMy� � �L awl�1•' he a d ld. ar •www a Yb iw r.l *A- Elam - "pgpm-"fww- An wwwr.wll�.lws'.rl INE f, "M son" sm; w wmp"ary U"Lso" Or • Oft war Un Jeer dW6 r MEL to l A&01' 7�Jti rwdm�4y.wr.i � aw4aew ew awar altwt wo ww. v i. ?T infract aslr d it aw.wdk w ds w wwi SIA don UK msMm lossim GM ao"tair".�ronis A" sombose •awaldMYaw"Maa ti ,4 January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and 'Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 (CONTINUED FROM 12/14/93 FOR REFERRAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-2 AND TEXT AMENDMENT LOCATION: DOWNTOWN AREA AND CITYWIDE INITIATED BY CITY 'COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION PURPOSE: AMENDMENT TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION CERTIFIED LAND USE PLAN REGARDING POLICIES FOR PARKING IN DOWNTOWN TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MODIFY PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO IMPLEMENT DOWNTOWN PARKING RECOMMENDATIONS Planning Commission and StaffRecommendation To approve the amendments, as modified by the City .Council,, by adopting the attached Resolution and introducing the 'attached-, Ordinance. ADDITIONAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION To adopt a mitigated environmental negative declaration by re -adapting the Resolution, as modified, and introducing the Ordinance with the findings contained therein. Background At the meeting of December 14, 1993, the City Council considered the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and made 'a. few minor modifications for purpose of clarification. The Council adopted Resolution 93-5646 amending the Coastal Land Use Plan At their meeting of January -18, 1994, the Planning Commission reviewed the changes, and,agrees that they should be included. Analysis The modifications made by the City Council are shown in bold in the attached resolution and ordinance. Additional language has been included in the ordinance and resolution for adoption of a mitigated negative declaration rather than simply a negative declaration, as recommended by the _ 1 �i • I .+ City Attorney. The two items to be specifically identified as mitigation measures are the in -lieu parking fee program and the requirement' for bicycle racks to encourage another form of transportation. The addition of this language, and a further correction of the text of the Land : Use Pian amendmentto read the same as the new text in the ordinance, requires adoption of a new Resolution (superseding Resolution 93-5646). Respectful1 su mitted, NC f Ken Robertson Associate Planner Micha 1 Schubach Planning Director Stephen R Burrell City Mana r Attachments 1. Planning Commission Staff Report 1/18/94 and Draft Minutes 2. City Council Minutes 12/14/93 3. Proposed Resolution and Ordinance p/pcsrpark 2 ,. I Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission January 11, 1994 Regular Meeting of January 18, 1994 (REFERRAL BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-2 LOCATION: DOWNTOWN AREA AND CITYWIDE INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION PURPOSE: AMENDMENT TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION CERTIFIED LAND USE PLAN REGARDING POLICIES FOR PARKING IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MODIFY PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO IMPLEMENT DOWNTOWN PARKING RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation Recommend approval the amendments, as modified by the City Council. Background At their meeting of December 14, 1993, the City Council considered the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and made a few minor modifications and clarifications to the proposed amendments. Before adopting these changes, the Council has referred them back to the Planning Commission for review and comment. Analysis The modifications made by the City Council are shown in bold in the attached draft ordinance. SECTION 2 These changes to Section 1162 (d) and (e) are for purposes of clarification only. While the added language is not necessary, it makes it clear, by reference, that base parking requirements _ for expansions or changes of uses within downtown will be based on the new parking requirements established for downtown (Section 1152.5). SECTION 4 - The added language at the end of the Section 1167(a) "the private party shall pay said -fee as requested by the DBAEDC" replaces "the private party may request a monthly payment schedule." This change is to allow not only the option of a monthly payment schedule, but any method of payment requested by the DBAEDC. 48 -3 _ _ AMENDMENT TO COASTAL LAND USE PLAN The same change as above (SECTION 4) was made in the text of the L.U.P. amendment. In addition to the above modifications, the Council considered recommendations from the DBAEDC in regards to the parking in -lieu fees. Rather than incorporate these amendments into the proposed text changes, the DBAEDC was requested to investigate the matter further, in order to determine the appropriate amount and procedure for payment of parking in -lieu fees which could be adopted as a policy in the future. The Planning Commission should also review and comment on these preliminary recommendations, which are as stated in the Analysis section of the attached City Council staff report. (Final recommendations are not needed at this time) The recommended amount of -the in -lieu fee is $6,000, which is less than the current amount of about $8,500. The DBAEDC will also purchase an equivalent of 20 spaces to distribute to private businesses/property owners. The DBAEDC recognizes that this amount may not necessarily cover the initial cost of constructing a parking space, but they also were concerned with setting the price at a level that would still provide incentives for a business or property owner to pay the fee. The estimates for actual construction costs of a parking space vary depending on the type of parking structure construction (underground or above ground) and if land cost is included (The Public Works Director estimates a range of $8,000-$18,000 per space for a parking structure, not including land costs). CONCU : WiCcha-el Schubach (� Planning Director Attachments Respectfu7 y submitted, iYe'fi Robetrts;bn /Associate Planner 1. City Council Staff Report/Minutes 12/14/93 2. Draft Ordinance and Resolution p/pcsrpark t�'� R t 9�': ��Jl tI �Td J a 9. SS 93-2 -- A REFERRAL BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL TO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON MODIFICATIONS TO THE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND AMENDMENTS TO THE COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IN REGARDS TO DOWNTOWN PARKING. on Staff Recommended Acti : To recommend approval of the modifications. Page g- PC Minutes 1-18-94 Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommended approval as modified by the City Council. Comm. Di Monda stressed the request for parking requirement revision was originated by the Planning Commission. Mr. Schubach stated the City Attorney's opinion stated it was all right to modify the Negative Declaration to state, "Mitigated Negative Declaration". Chmn. Merl opened the Hearing at 7:31 p.m. No one wished to speak relating to this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Hearing at 7:31 p.m. Comm. Di Monda recalled the Planning Commission had recommended the in -lieu fee be deleted and a monthly fee be instituted. Mr. Schubach discussed the actions and possible studies being taken. Comm. Di Monda commented he was a proponent of in -lieu fee elimination, supported by the Planning Commission, and questioned the fact that fees are not being defined in dollar amount. Mr.. Schubach detailed the recommendations/action of the Downtown Enhancement Commission pertaining to in -lieu fees, its application to "old" and "new" buildings and including the action cosUprice of parking spaces on an annual basis and language for clarification. He stated all proposals must be approved by the Coastal Commission. Comm. Di Monda noted no definition had been included for a "smaller lot", noting the Commission's intention had been to reduce the parking requirem--nts to 65% in the downtown zone, which would be defined by the Downtown Enhancement Commission, and to further reduce the parking requirements of buildings with a l to 1 ratio, with the lot size of 10,000 sq -ft. or less. Mr. Schubach stated this policy was a general plan change, allowing modification of the zoning ordinance; the purpose being for clarification. Comm. Suard determined further study would be conducted to determine who would actually pay the in -lieu fee. MO"TION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Shard, to APPROVE Item SS 93-2. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Suard, Chmn. Merl NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 10.a. A resolution of intent to in'' astudy and possible location of parking spaces on residen t t in regards to Mr. Schubach stated Staff atement should be in the zonings ce regarding where specifically o . ing can be located on a lot. Comm. Marks felt a statement Neopen is not allowed would be sufficient. Mr. Schubach's preference was to state what is Page 6 PC Minutes 1-13-94 'ty Attorney Vose also responded to Council questio an id the business was a pre-existing non-conf ing use; sa' the Council could exercise its disc ion and waive any ditions as the facts warrant Action: To grant a appeal an erturn the Planning Commission decision b ele A the conditions that re- quired the doors be remov from the booths and required a 10:00 P.M. closin me, a to refer the matter back to the Planning ission for r 'ew and comment. Motion Ben second Bowler. T motion carried unanimo The meet' recessed at 8:40 P.M. The ing reconvened at 8:53 P.M. S. AMENDMENTS TO THE POLICIES OF THE COASTAL COMMISSION CERTIFIED LAND USE PLAN IN REGARDS TO PARKING IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND TEXT AMENDMENTS TO COMMERCIAL PARKING REOUIREMENTS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning director Michael Schubach dated December 6, 1993. Supplemental letter from Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place, dated December 14, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Mr. Schubach reported that the specific amendments in- cluded (but were not limited to): 1) not requiring parking on building sites of 10,000 sq. ft. or less with a floor area ration of 1:1 or less within the downtown area; 2) requiring parking in downtown area sites at 65% of the zoning Ordinance standard applied outside the downtown area; 3) allowing parking in -lieu fees to be paid by the City rather than the developer as an option, and to allow a monthly payment schedule; 4) for cases of expansion or changes of uses to exist- ing commercial buildings, to calculate parking re- quirements for expansion or the added intensity only; 5) more intense or new development will require bicy- cle racks; and, -- 6) adding new. criteria to the Parking Plan provisions to allow other methods for providing for parking based on shared parking in the downtown area or multiple tenant buildings, particularly for small restaurants. The public hearing opened at 8:56 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, asked if this City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8374 item had anything to do with parking structures; Jerry Newton - 2041 Circle Drive, Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission Chairperson, suggested several changes to the Resolution and the Ordinance (which were ac- cepted by the Council and incorporated into its motions listed below); Dean Nota - 2467 Myrtle, said he was speaking in support of the three Planning Commission recom- mendations in this item and to make a blanket statement that this is the City Council's op- portunity to implement a key R/UDAT recommenda- tion; questioned number 3 on page 2 of the staff report regarding in -lieu fees; suggested that in -lieu fees be examined yearly rather than tied,to the Consumer Price Index as that would allow more flexibility to reflect actual costs; suggested on page 11 that after the Planning Commission makes a decision, the ap- plicant be given two options: full payment or monthly payments; Warren Barr - Chamber of Commerce President, said the Chamber supported the concept; June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, suggested that before the in -lieu fees were set that the actual cost of a new parking space be deter- mined; questioned if there was a plan for what would be done with the money collected from in - lieu fees; and, Jerry Newton - said that according to the costs supplied by Allright Parking, the cost per parking space in a structure, without land costs, was $6,500; if the parking space was on a ground lot, 300 sq.ft. would be needed per car at a cost of $60 per sq.ft. for land, which would equal $18,000 per space. The public hearing closed at 9:22 P.M. Action: ' To approve the Planning Commission and staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 93-5646, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE POLICIES OF THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IN REGARDS TO PARKING, AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PENDING APPROVAL OF SAID AMENDMENT BY THE COASTAL COMMISSION.", _ as amended by Mr. Newton on page four of the Resolution (last page), to place a period after the words, "... provided on site." at the end of line 11 1/2, and delete the remainder of that paragraph and the next paragraph in its entirety. _ Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. The motion carried- unanimously. arriedunanimously. City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8375 -9- 6. C C Further Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 94-1099, as amended by Mr. Newton, and clarified by Council, on page three of the Ordinance (page 10 of the staff report), Section 2, paragraph (d), at the end of the underlined sentence in line 23 1/2, that reads, "... the amount of expansion.", to add the words, ", subject to the provi- sions of Section 1152.5."; on page three of the Or- dinance (page 10 of the staff report), Section 2, para- graph (e), after the first word of line 26 1/2, "... demand," add the words, "there shall be no additional parking requirements for lots under 10,000 square feet except to the extent there is a change in the floor area to lot area ratio in excess of 1: 1, ... "; and, on page four of the Ordinance (page 11 of the staff report), Section 4, in the middle of line 8 1/2 that reads, "... , the private party", to add the words, "shall pay said fee as requested by the Downtown Business Area Enhance- ment District Advisory Commission.", and delete the remainder of the Motion Benz, unanimously. sentence. second Bowler. The motion carried Further Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 94-1099, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, IN REGARDS TO OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, TO ESTABLISH NEW AND LESS RESTRICTIVE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA, AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSIONS AND CHANGES OF USE, AND RECOMMENDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Benz, second Oakes. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: None _Proposed Action: To refer to the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission to reduce the in -lieu fee to $1,500 or to determine a reasonable reduction. Motion Benz, second Oakes. The motion was discussed and then amended by the maker and second to the motion shown below. Final Action: To direct that the in -lieu fee be re- analyzed by the Downtown Business Area Enhancement Dis- trict Advisory Commission, this being its primary juris- diction, to determine an appropriate in -lieu fee and to _ study other financial alternatives in order to create new parking. Motion Benz, second Oakes. The motion carried unanimously. BPECIAL ��AI UNING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT RAR DISE SALES City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8376 —q— RESOLUTION NO. 94- 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE POLICIES OF THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE 2 PLAN IN REGARDS TO PARKING, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PENDING APPROVAL OF SAID 3 AMENDMENT BY THE COASTAL COMMISSION 4 WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on December 5 14, 1993, and January 25, 1994, to consider oral and written 6 testimony and made the following Findings: 7 A. Current parking policies, as contained in the Coastal 8 Commission Certified Land Use Plan, and current parking 9 requirements of the zoning ordinance, do not adequately 10 recognize the unique circumstances, historic development and 11 ownership patterns, and the parking needs of the downtown 12 commercial area and are thus too stringent. As a result the 13 current parking policies and requirements are unnecessarily 14 discouraging potential business growth and new business 15 activity; 16 B. The downtown commercial district is unique in terms of its 17 parking needs as compared to other commercial areas within 18 the City for the following reasons: 19 1. Its location near and along a regional bike path along) 20 the beach, which means it is easily accessible to al 21 large population by a significant alternative to a motor 22 vehicle; 23 2. Its location near high density residential areas so that 24 many people can reach downtown destinations on foot; 25 3. Its historic ownership and development patterns (small 26 lots, small buildings, store fronts on the street, and 27 pedestrian scale and orientation) for which 28 standardized modern parking standards do not apply; 4. The availability of public parking on the street and in public parking lots which are rarely used to capacity; 1 5. The variety and mix of commercial uses in a concentrated 2 area which encourages shared parking trips; 3 6. The evening and nighttime orientation of many of the 4 businesses (restaurants, night clubs, coffee houses, 5 bars) which differ from beach users peak use of parking 6 facilities; 7 7. Its established history as a commercial district where 8 users are willing to walk or ride bikes, and if driving, 9 who do not necessarily expect to park near their 10 specific intended destination, and thus plan ahead to ll visit more than one destination within the district; 12 8. Its location along existing and proposed public transit 13 routes; 14 C. Since the downtown district comparatively unique parking 15 demand is affected by a variety of complex factors, the 16 amount of increase in parking demand, if any, and the 17 potential loss of beach access parking is difficult to 18 determine. However, it will be mitigated with a commitment 19 by the city to construct parking to partially off-set 20 measured increases in demand; 21 D. When expansion or changes of use are proposed, businesses and 22 commercial uses throughout the city should only be 23 responsible for providing parking for the increased parking 24 demand, and no longer required to bring the entire site up to 25 _. current codes; 26 E. The proposed amendment, with the incorporation of mitigation 27 measures to set aside parking in-lieu fees to commit the city 28 to increase the supply of off street parking, and the requirement for bicycle parking to encourage alternative forms of transportation will result in a less than 1 significant impact on the environment, and more specifically 2 with the incorporation of said mitigation measure will have a 3 less than significant impact on parking in the downtown based 4 on the findings noted above in section B and C; 5 6 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby amends the Coastal Commission certified 7 Land Use Plan, subject to final approval by the Coastal Commission as follows: 8 SECTION I: Amend the policies of the certified Land Use Plan 9 Section III to read as'follows: 10 Under B. Goals and Objectives add the following: 11 116. To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian oriented downtown business area --which are less than a, 12 typical commercial area because of its proximity to a regional bike path and to high density residential 13 areas --in order to maximize improvements and expansions to visitor serving business activities without the 14 burden of unnecessary parking regulations and, further, to encourage alternatives to motorized vehicles in 15 reaching downtown destinations. 16 Under C.(1.) Existing Policies and Programs; amend the first policy to read as follows 17 "Policy:' The City should not allow the elimination of 18 existing on -street parking or off-street parking spaces within the coastal zone. Future residential and commercial 19 construction should provide the actual parking necessary to meet the demand generated. In the pedestrian oriented 20 downtown commercial district alternatives to providing parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowed, 21 to encourage alternatives to using motorized vehicles and to encourage improvement and enhancement of visitor serving 22 business activities. SECION 2. Amend the policies and programs relating to downtown 23 parking to read as follows (replacing the last paragraph on page 24 4, the entire page 5, and the first two paragraphs of page 5a)- 25 "Program: The City has established the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission (DBAEDC) to determine 26 the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district which will be recommended to the City Council. The --proposed uses 27 are for the acquisition, construction of new parking facilities, and/or the maintenance and operation of existing 28 parking facilities for the benefit of the area; for other improvements and enhancements including, but not limited to: street, landscaping, and pedestrian sidewalk improvements; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 public events; and the general promotion of business. activities in the area" Program: To recognize the unique parking needs and constraints in the downtown district, parking requirements for new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of uses within the downtown district shall be less than required elsewhere in the City. i. When parking is required, it shall be 65% of the requirement as set forth for other areas within the City ii. Projects on smaller lots within the downtown district- because of the physical constraints to providing parkin and the desire to promote a pedestrian orientation shall not be required to provide any parking when the floor area to building ratio is proposed to be 1.1 or less. Program: In order to mitigate the impacts of increased parking demand that is created by new development, but is not compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces, the DBAEDC, or its successor agency or the private party, shall provide an in -lieu fund transfer or an in lieu fee to an improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking, in an amount determined to be sufficient to off set the increase in required parking spaces caused by the expansion, intensification, or new construction not provided on site. If the DBAEDC determines responsible for the in -lieu fee, the said fee as requested by the DBAEDC that the private party is rivate party shall pay Program The improvement fund to mitigate increased parkinc demand shall be geared to a threshold limit of increases parking demand. The threshold limit shall be established at 100 parking spaces. SECTION 3 This Resolution supursedes Resolution 93-5646 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 1994 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City o Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: exe;�'_4 '/ lleael_ CITY ATTORNEY p/perspark -/3- 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, IN REGARDS TO OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, TO ESTABLISH NEW AND LESS RESTRICTIVE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA, AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSIONS AND CHANGES OF USE, AND THE ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PENDING APPROVAL BY THE COASTAL COMMISSION) WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on December 14, 1993, and January 25, 1994, to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Current parking policies, as contained in the Coastal Commission Certified Land Use Plan, and current parking requirements of the zoning ordinance, do not adequately recognize the unique circumstances, historic development and ownership patterns, and the parking needs of the downtown commercial area and are thus too stringent. As a result the current parking policies and requirements are unnecessarily discouraging potential business growth and new business activity; B. The downtown commercial district is unique in terms of its parking needs as compared to other commercial areas within the City for the following reasons: 1. Its location near and along a regional bike path along the beach, which means it is easily accessible to a large population by a significant alternative to a motor vehicle; 2. Its location near high density residential areas so that many people can reach downtown destinations on foot; 1 3. Its historic ownership and development patterns (small 2 lots, small buildings, store fronts on the street, and 3 pedestrian scale and orientation) for which 4 standardized modern parking standards do not apply,- 5 pply;5 4. The availability of public parking on the street and in 6 public parking lots which are rarely used to capacity; 7 5. The variety and mix of commercial uses in a concentrated 8 area which encourages shared parking trips; 9 6. The evening and nighttime orientation of many of the 10 businesses (restaurants, night clubs, coffee houses, 11 bars) which differ from beach users peak use of parking 12 facilities; 13 7. Its established history as a commercial district where 14 users are willing to walk or ride bikes, and if driving, 15 who do not necessarily expect to park near their 16 specific intended destination, and thus plan ahead to 17 visit more than one destination within the district; 18 8. Its location along existing and proposed public transit 19 routes; 20 C. Since the downtown district comparatively unique parking 21 demand is affected by a variety of complex factors, the 22 amount of increase in parking demand, if any, and the 23 potential loss of beach access parking is difficult to 24 determine. However, it will be mitigated with a commitment 25 by the city to 'construct parking to partially off -set 26 measured increases in demand; 27 D. When expansion or changes of use are proposed, businesses and 28 IS IVA 3 a 5 6 7 8 9 10 1l 12 13 14 15 16 17i 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 commercial uses throughout the city should only be responsible for providing parking for the increased parking demand, and no longer required to bring the entire site up to current codes; E. The proposed ordinance amendment, with the incorporation of mitigation measures to set aside parking in -lieu fees to commit the city to increase the supply of off street parking, and the requirement for bicycle parking to encourage alternative forms. of transportation will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and more specifically with the incorporation of said mitigation measure will have a less than significant impact on parking in the downtown based on the findings noted above in section B and C; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby ordains that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1: Add Section 1152.5 to the zoning ordinance: "Sec. 1152.5 Parking Requirements for the Downtown Area The following requirements apply within in the boundary of the downtown area, as defined by the map incorporated herein. A. The amount of parking shall be calculated at 65% of the parking required for each particular use as set forth in Section 1152. B. Building sites equal to or less than 10,000 square feet: If the floor area to lot area ratio is 1:1 or less -no parking is required. If the the floor area to lot area ratio exceeds 1:1 only the excess floor area over the 1:1 ratio shall be considered in determining the required parking pursuant to subsection A." C. Bicycle racks/facilities shall be provided and/or maintained in conjunction with any intensification of 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 use, or new construction, in an amount and location to the satisfaction of the Planning Director." SECTION 2. Amend Sections 1162(d) and 1162(e) regarding parking requirements for expansion and changing existing uses by adding the underlined text, as follows : "(d) For every building in a "C" or "M" zone hereafter erected, or reconstructed, or expanded, the parking requirements and turning area for the entire building shall be as set forth in this ordinance. However for an expansion of an existing building legally nonconforming to parking requirements, parking requirements shall only be applied to the amount of expansion, subject to Section 1152.5 for expansions in the downtown area. In no case shall new construction reduce the parking serving an existing use below the requirements of this ordinance. (e) When the use of an existing building or structure is changed to a more intense use with a higher parking demand there shall be no additional parking requirement for sites in the downtown area except to the extent there is a change of floor area to lot area ratio in excess of 1:1. Otherwise, the requirement for additional parking, shall be calculated as the difference between the required parking as stated in this Article for that particular use as compared to the requirement for the existing or previous use which shall be met prior 'to occupying the building unless otherwise specified in this Article." SECTION 3. Amend Section 1169 (b), factors to consider for Parking Plans, to add the following underlined text, and. sub -section (7) to (8).: "7. Peak hours of the proposed use as compared with other uses sharing the same parking facilities especially in the case of small restaurants or snack shops in the downtown area or in multi -tenant buildings" SECTION 4: Insert the following paragraph after paragraph 1 of Section 1167 (a): "If the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission determines that the private party is responsible, for the in -lieu fee, the private party shall pay said fee as requested by the DBAEDC" SECTION 5. Amend Article 11.5 by including the attached map identifying the downtown area. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after- the final ,certification by the California Coastal Commission of 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 amendments to the City of Hermosa Beach Certified Land Use Plan as set forth in Resolution 94 - SECTION 7. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/ccrspark SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO JANUARY 20, 1994 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION SUBJECT: IN -LIEU PARKING FEE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Downtown Enhancement Commission recommend to the City Council: To set aside $120,000 from the VPD fund account to purchase 20 parking spaces for the purpose of business incentive to be disposed by the Downtown Enhancement Commission.. ANALYSIS: The Downtown Enhancement Commission at their meeting of January 19, 1994, approved a motion to request City Council's permission to allow the Commission to purchase 20 in - lieu parking spaces at a price of $6,000 per space, the money to be put into an interest bearing in -lieu fee account. Staff will be returning with a policy for the City Council's approval for the methods of disposing the 20 parking spaces. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION C 9 January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 (CONTINUED FROM 12/14/93 FOR REFERRAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION) SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP 92-33 (AMORTIZED) LOCATION: 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - "THE TENDER BOX" APPELLANT/: JUMP INC. APPLICANT 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO APPEAL TWO OF THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: - A NEW LIMIT ON HOURS OF OPERATION, 10:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. - REMOVAL OF THE DOORS ON THE VIDEO BOOTHS Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation _ To grant the appeal to eliminate the two subject conditions, with the clarification that the door locks will be of a type not to impede entry by the police, by adopting the attached resolution. Background At their meeting of January 4, 1994, the Planning Commission determined to support of the decision of the City Council to grant the appeal, and eliminate the two subject conditions. The Commission's only comment was to clarify that if lockable doors are allowed to the viewing booths that it be specified that the locks cannot impede access by the police. For further background please refer to the attached minutes and staff report. Analysis The Planning Commission agreed with the Council's reasoning in granting the appeal and thus agrees that the two standard conditions regarding hours and closure of doors were not fair to the existing business which does not have a record of problems, as demonstrated by the operation of the business, and in the police record. _ �- 4 To incorporate the recommended clarification of the Commission, in regards door locks, condition #15 was modified to add a statement that door locks shall be of a type to allow access by the Police. J CONCUR: � Michael Schubach Planning Director l/ St e : Burrell City Manager Attachments 1. P.C. Minutes 1/4/94 2. Letter from applicant p/pcsr809 - 2 - J Y,dn obe s 6n Associate Planner I 2 3 a 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH CONDITIONS, ELIMINATING TWO OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IMPOSED CONDITIONS ON APPEAL, FOR AN EXISTING ADULT BUSINESS (SALE OF ADULT BOOKS, VIDEOS, MAGAZINES AND PARAPHERNALIA AND ADULT THEATER/ARCADE) AT 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2 AND LOT 4 REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on December 14, 1993, and January 25, 1994, to consider a conditional use permit for an existing adult business, and an appeal of two of the Planning Commission imposed conditions on said permit, and to receive oral and written testimony on the matter, and made the following findings; A. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for an existing adult business, including sales of adult books, videos, magazines and paraphernalia and an adult theater/arcade, as required by Section 13.5(b) of the zoning ordinance; B. The inherent nature of adult businesses are recognized as having potentially objectionable and deleterious operational characteristics; C. The regulation of adult business operations and locations is in the interest of _the general public health, safety, and welfare; Because the subject. adult business is existing and has already estab-l-ished certain measures to prevent lewd and immoral behavior, including the use of surveillance cameras and security attendants, not all of the standard --conditions for adult businesses as set forth in Section 10-5 (including the two standard conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, and appealed by the applicant, to limit hours of 1 operation from 10:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. and to require the 2 closure of doors on the video viewing booths) are applicable, 3 since their application would pose a potential hardship on an 4 existing business beyond the intent of Section 13.5(b) or 5 Section 10-5; G E. The conditions as set forth below, are necessary to prevent 7 illegal and immoral acts from occurring on the premises and 8 in the vicinity, and will serve to mitigate the potential 9 threat to the public safety and welfare to the maximum 10 possible; 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the 12 City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit, on appeal, to allow the adult business at 13 809 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the following conditions, which supersede the conditions contained in Planning Commission 14 Resolution 93-35: 15 SECTION I (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) 16 Standard Operating Conditions 17 1. Clearly visible signs shall be posted at the entrance to the 18 premises stating "Adults Only - No Minors Permitted" or equivalent wording. 19 2. All building openings, entries, and windows shall be designed 20 or screened so that the contents of the building may not be seen from the public sidewalk or equivalent public areas 21 accessible to minors. 22 3. The public interior areas shall be fully and brightly lighted and arranged so that every portion of the premises is visible 23 upon entrance by direct sight or by surveillance cameras, but shall not be viewed from outside, and so that any patron is 24 also easily visible to anyone walking through the premises. 25 4. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed on the premises and appropriate notification of this -restriction 26 shall be displayed on the premises. 27 5. Advertisements, displays, or other promotional materials shall not be shown or exhibited so as to be visible to the 28 public from exterior areas. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. No loudspeakers or sound equipment shall be used on the premises that can be discerned from exterior areas. 7. Outdoor signs or similar displays showing nude bodies, topless or bottomless female bodies, or bottomless male bodies shall be prohibited. 8. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents and/or nearby commercial establishments. 9. No home delivery of any materials that are distinguished or characterized by the depiction or description of specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities. 10. The exterior and interior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 11. All signs must comply with the City Sign Ordinance: Proper sign permits, where necessary, shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety. 12. A manager or employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. (a) The conditional use permit conditions shall be placed on the property in a location where employees can easily. read the conditions. Site Specific Conditions 13. The final floor layout shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans. Modification to the plan needs review and may be approved by the Planning Director. 14. The number of film or video viewing machines or booths shall not exceed eight (8) individual viewing booths. 15. There shall be only one individual per viewing booth at a time with appropriate signage indicating this condition. The locks used on the doors of the individual viewing booths shall not impede access by the Police. 16. All surveillance cameras shall be maintained in operational order, and operating during business hours. 17. An attendant shall be present in the theater area monitoring use of the theater booths at all hours the business is open, and shall be made aware of the rules as stated in this C.U.P. 18. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent lewd and lascivious. acts, and any other loitering, loud, boisterous, or illegal activity of patrons inside the business or in --the immediate area. 19. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists, and may authorize the presence of a police 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem, and shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the Commission. 20. A sign shall be permanently displayed at the entrance requesting that patrons be considerate of the residential neighbors and not park in residential areas, or equivalent wording. 21. The existing trash dumpster used in conjunction with the business shall be maintained in the south side yard, enclosed within locked 6 -foot high gates, and shall be maintained in accordance with Chapter 27A of the municipal code. 22. It shall be verified that the interior stairway is permanently sealed and that interior access to the second floor is permanently eliminated. 23. The north side yard shall have a 6 -foot high gate, maintained locked, and prohibiting public access. 24. The business shall not operate or be open to the public between the hours of 2:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. daily. SECTION II This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owner of the property involved have filed at the office of the Department of Planning their affidavit stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Los Angeles County, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or VY'oceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if- the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall- not thereafter be'responsible to defend, indemnify, or --hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. SECTION III Any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for 'a public hearing for the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of ,I 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of l Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: LK,66 -z, _ .2/ __ CITY ATTORNEY p/pers809a r C M M l 1. CUP 92-33 -- A REFERRAL BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL TO REVIEW _ THESPECIFIC CONDITIONS IMPOSED TO A CONDITIONAL USEPERMITTO AUTHORIZE AN EXISTING ADULT THEATER AND BOOKSTORE AT 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, THE TENDER BOX. - Staff Recommend d Action: To approve modified Conditional Use Permit Page 5 PC Minutes 1-4-94 Mr. Schubach explained the conditions imposed by the Commission was appealed to the Council, who granted that appeal and referred the matter back to the Commission. Comm. Di Monda confirmed with Mr. Schubach that one Councilman had changed his vote. Comm. Di Monda commented upon the "political heat" the Commission had been subject to when this issue had been originally presented. Chmn. Merl opened the Hearing at 8:00 p.m. Jack Wood, 200 Pier Ave., applicant's representative, stated two items had been presented to the Council because they were difficult "to live with". He noted the business was existing and had operated for many years without difficulty. The intent of an amortized C.U.P. is to solve problems when there are problems. He noted that C.U.P.s are site specific and asked the Commission for its agreement with the Council's decision, allowing the applicant to operate the business as done in the past. He noted the Police Chief had testified to no problems experienced since 1988. He stated the Council felt the findings were not strong enough and had granted the appeal. He discussed with Comm. Marks the Police records, noting the applicant currently rented both upstairs and downstairs, but had previously rented only the downstairs. She used the upstairs area for storage, office and a security guard location. She also purchased the two residents adjacent to the business location. No one else wished to speak relating to this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Hearing at 8:10 p.m. Comm. Di Monda felt the political decision should have been made at the Council level. Comm. Suard felt the purpose of making exceptions to the ordinance was due to site specific problems, noting the problems with hours and doors were not site specific. He felt the ordinance was unworkable, noting that if exception is allowed for this business, in fairness to other businesses, the ordinance should be changed. He proposed a recommendation be made that the ordinance be changed to allow doors and to state the time frame is 2:00 a.m., which can be cut back upon any verified complaints received by the Police Dept. He discussed with Commissioners the issue of nonlocking doors. At Comm. Marks' request, Mr. Wood explained the reason the applicant wished to maintain the doors, the various types of customers and use of the equipment. He stressed that patron privacy was a necessity, but that the clients were of a different type than in another local establishment. Mr. Schubach commented the text could be changed with a Resolution of Intent to amend the text. W MOTION by Comm. Suard, Seconded by Chmn. Merl, to return CUP 92-33 to the City Council recommending APPROVAL of the Council's action, with the clarification that the door locks will be of a type not to impede entry by. the Police. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Suard, Chmn. Merl NOES: Comm. Marks ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Page 6 PC Minutes 1-4-94 . 9— December 30, 1993 Honorable Chairman and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission January 4, 1993 (REFERRAL BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW OF MODIFICATION) SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP 92-33 (AMORTIZED) LOCATION: 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - "THE TENDER BOX" APPELLANT/: JUMP INC. APPLICANT 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH,- CA 90254 PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COUNCIL'S ACTION TO ELIMINATE, ON APPEAL, TWO OF THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: - A NEW LIMIT ON HOURS OF OPERATION, 10:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. - REMOVAL OF THE DOORS ON THE VIDEO BOOTHS Recommendation To review .and comment on the decision of the City Council to grant the appeal and modify the C.U.P. by eliminating the two subject conditions. Background At their meeting of December 14, 1993, the City Council considered and granted the applicant's appeal of two conditions imposed by the Planning Commission which would have required the business to change its hours and to remove the doors on the individual video viewing booths. For further background please refer to the attached City Council minutes and staff report. Analysis The City Council granted the appeal after considering the testimony from the applicant and members of the public. Their reason for granting the appeal was that while the conditions were imposed to promote a sense of fairness with the other adult_ business (previously called the "Fantasy Arcade"), the conditions were not ultimately fair to the "Tender Box" which does not have the same problems, as demonstrated by the operation of the business, and in the police record. - 10- For further analysis and discussion of the appeal please refer to the attached December 14, 1993, City Council staff report. CONCU en Robertson Associate Planner Michael ch ach Planning Director Attachments 1. C.C. Action Minutes 12/14/93 2. C.C. Staff report 12/14/93 3. Applicant's appeal letter p/pcsr809 A Retail Entertainment Business JUMP INC. 809 Pacific Coast Hwy., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254.213/318-2882 RECEIVED RECEIVED JAN 1 2 1994 JAN 1 1 1994 January 10, 1994 PLANNING DEPT. Ladies and Gentlemen, of City Council CITY MGR. OFFICE This is, I hope, the last step in a long, difficult, and expensive ,journey to gain my "amortized" C:. U. P. There was a review of your appeal action by the Planning Commission on 1/3/94. And to my surprise they asked you to make a modifi- cation to my door latching system. They feigned misunder- standing my procedure but it appeared to be the desire to have the last word (A natural product of asking for review and comments. And a frustrating, expensive one for the business owner). Anyone who has seen my operation or who listens to what we tell them about it should understand why we do not need further tinkering. This is how it works in my store: I have an attendant in charge of the theater area all the time the theaters operate. Not the sales clerk;'a separate person who works only that part of the store. When, a patron, comes in they are directed to the token machine. After their token purchase the attendant directs the customer to an available booth or instructs them to wait. When a booth becomes available it is checked by the atten- dant prior to a new customer entering. The attendant insures that only one patron enters each booth. As the door closes alight goes on indicating the booth is occupied (Some type of throw.or latch is needed to activate the system, to keep it on while occupied and to prevent fluttering that would occur on an unlatched door). The attendant has a tool that can be used to open the door from the outside if necessary (If the police were to request access the attendant would simply open it for them. But that has never been needed). There are signs posted in the vestibule to iniorm all to the system and restrict access to one at a time. This system has been in this place for many years. It is — 1Z— one I developed and refined over the years to make my operation smooth and comfortable for my customers. They like it, we like it. I think it serves your need as well. Please receive and file the Commission's comments and let my C. U. P. stand as you last approved it. T}y8n ` yo � i Vada Klein Presi en , Jump Inc. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO IMPOSE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS TO A C.U.P. TO AUTHORIZE AN EXISTING ADULT THEATRE AND'BOOKSTORE AT 809 PACIFIC COAST HIGH- WAY, 11THE TENDER BOX". Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated December 6, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:37 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jack Wood - 200 Pier Avenue, #38, representing the business owner, said a Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) should be site specific; said an amor- tized C.U.P., which is placed on an existing business, is different than a new business com- ing into the area knowing in advance the condi- tions that will be placed upon it; said there had been no complaints regarding the operation of the business; the two conditions being ap- pealed would place a hardship on the business and the City should not put conditions in a C.U.P. that would force a business out of the City; Vada Klein - 809 Pacific Coast Highway, business owner, said she has been in the same business for 20 years at that location and there has never been an arrest, violation or complaint; asked that she be allowed to continue her busi- ness there by granting her appeal; Warren Barr - Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce President, said that the point of a C.U.P. was that it was site specific to take care of any - specific problems; Phyllis Pennings - 625 Fifth Street, said that she has never been aware of any problems at the business; - - Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, said he was unhappy with a 2:00 A.M. closing as all other businesses closed at 10:00 P.M.; said he was City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8371 concerned with the safety of school children; said the City was not in a position to deny the use, but could provide for the health and safe- ty of the public; expressed concerns. regarding the possibility of unsanitary conditions in closed booths; felt conditions should be ap- plied consistently; and, the City could avoid litigation and gain compliance from the "Fanta- sy Arcade" if the conditions were consistent; Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, said the busi- ness should not have hours beyond 10:00 P.M. and the doors should be kept off of the booths; said the C.U.P. could be denied or specific conditions placed on it; requested that the appeal be denied; June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, said only 10 percent of businesses needed a C.U.P. and those were mainly alcohol, adult businesses, and auto repair; said the fact that there were fewer problems now than in the past was due to C.U.P.s; felt that Ms. Klein would alleviate any problem that occurred, but a C.U.P. ran with the land not the owner; suggested the problem with the hours could be addressed by allowing the later hours and making a change if there were complaints and the problem with the doors could be solved by putting in glass windows; Jerry Newton - 2041 Circle Drive, said that there were no problems recorded for "The Tender Box" and to impose a C.U.P. when there were no prob- lems was ridiculous; Mark Woodward - 1222 Ninth Street, agreed with Mr. Newton; said he was a patron of "The Tender Box" and the owner ran a clean operation; George Schmeltzer - (no address given), former Councilmember, said he was here to speak in favor of granting the appeal of Vada Klein; said she has been an active, involved member of the community for many years and had made dona- tions of over $25,000 to the Community Center Foundation over the past 20 years; said her business met a need in the community or she would not have been able to stay in business; Dave Reimer -802 Monterey Blvd., said he was a 15 year.resident of Hermosa; felt "The Tender Box" has been a good neighbor; said the same condi- _ tions did not need to be applied to both busi- nesses as .there was no comparison with the other adult business in the City; Mike Newfield - "Bijou" owner, said a C.U.P. was a - good idea to control businesses that are out of control, but questioned if that were the case in this instance; said it was a constraint of City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8372 --1s- trade to force an owner to lose 40 percent of its business by being forced to close four hours earlier than normal; questioned if the patrons were losing their right to privacy by having the doors removed from the booths; said the booths were sanitized after each use; asked that the appeal be granted; Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Loma Drive, said Vada Klein owns two properties behind the business and had improved them; said she lived in one of the properties so it would be in her interest to see the area maintained; said if there had been no complaints regarding this business then there were no grounds to impose the same condi- tions as were imposed on a business that had complaints; Dennis Kelly � 128 Ardmore, landlord for the "Ten- der Box" property; said the conditions being appealed would adversely affect the business and would cause him a loss of rents and a re- duction of property values; spoke of the his- tory of the businesses in the area as he had formerly lived in the building next door; asked that the appeal be granted as this business was being treated unfairly, and if necessary he would take legal action; Mary Ann Wright - 731 Eighth Street, neighbor to the business, said there have been complaints; said there had been a Federal drug bust a few years back; asked that the appeal not be gran- ted; and offered a large box of trash that had been picked up in the area that had been dropped by clients of the business; Steve Fortney - 1516 Monterey Blvd., agreed with Ms. Wright; and, Jack Wood - 200 Pier Avenue, #38, said his client, Ms. Klein, lived in the City and was a regis- tered voter at that address; said her office was above the store front; said the business could not be a safety threat to children as they were not allowed in the store; said zoning treats everyone the same but a C.U.P. is site specific; and asked that the appeal be granted. The public hearing closed at 8:21 P.M. Police Chief Val Straser responded to Council questions _ and said that since 1988 there had been no arrests or violations regarding the business; said the last com- plaint had been four or five years ago on literature that had been dropped; said the drug bust had been on _ another business in the area. City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8373 1 (0 r City Attorney Vose also responded to Council questions and said the business was a pre-existing non -conforming use; said the Council could exercise its discretion and waive any conditions as the facts warranted. Action: To grant the appeal and overturn the Planning Commission decision by deleting the conditions that re- quired the doors be removed from the booths and required a 10:00 P.M. closing time, and to refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for review and comment. Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting recessed at 8:40 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:53 P.M. City Council Minutes 12-14-93 Page 8374 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable Mayor anqMn� embe of the City Council From: Michael Schubach, Plannire r Subject: Land Use Element Revisi ) Date: January 19, 1994 Recommendations 1.) Staff recommends that since most of the document has been reviewed on several occassions by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, that instead of reconsidering the whole document again, the new City Council raise only specific questions on any portion or specific Goal, Objective, or Policy which there is concern. 2.) The Land Use Element Revision be brought back for adoption in final form after a final environmental assessment and Planning Commission review of any final changes. Alternative Recommendation: Review each section of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies for the sake of the new City Council members. Backqround At the November 23, 1993 City Council meeting the Land Use Element Revision was continued to the second meeting in January to allow the new members of the Council to review the Draft Land Use Element and the revisions made by the previous Council. Analysis The only issues not previously discussed were the Commercial Space Alternative with the R/UDAT -recommendations and the new boundaries of the Downtown Enhancement District. As the attached minutes indicate, the previous Council approved and amended the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the LUE. The General Plan Map and the Zoning Map inconsistencies portion of the document were also reviewed and amended. These changes are provided in the attached staff report dated 11/3193. E The revisions have been sent back to the Planning Commission for their review and comment. The Planning Commission agrees with all the recommended changes of the City Council, with the exception of the following: 1. Rezoning of Area 1 at the north end of the City. The Planning Commission believes that this area should be rezoned to R-1. 2. The Planning Commission does not believe the amendment to Implementation Policy 2.1 should include "on private property". The Policy currenty reads as amended by the City Council: "Allow private sector construction and operation of downtown public parking structures on private property." The Planning Commission's intent of this item was for "public property", not "private property". For further background on these Planning Commission concerns, please refer to the November 3, 1993 minutes. The proposed changes are underlined and the parts of the text to be removed are overstriked. Attachments: 1. Planning Commission and City Council Minutes 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated 11/3/93 Concur: � �b - STEPHEN R, BURR (- City Manager —Z— CITY�OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CERTIF G THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY.", (w ch sets spee limits on City streets; is required o be certified a ry five years; and sets the r mmended speed the sam as the posted speed), wit �he under- standing that st f will verify, and co ect if neces- sary, all speed lim postings and sen o the Municipal Court for certificatio Motion Oakes, second enz. The motion carried unanimously. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND (a) CLARIFICATIO' BAGGED BEGI CITY MANAGER DOWNTOWN SILVER METERS WILL BE NG NOVEMBER 24, 1993. Acting C' Manager Rooney said that she fished to clarif hat the downtown meters would be bagge start- ing vember 24, 1993, in time for the post Thanks wing s es period. (b) REQUEST TO CONTINUE LAND USE ELEMENT REVISION TO THE JANUARY 25, 1994 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Memo- randum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated November 15, 1993. City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions. Action: To approve continuing the Land Use Element revisions to the meeting of January 25, 1993, with the understanding that those portions of the Land Use Ele- ment that had not been reviewed by the previous Council would be discussed first, then previously discussed por- tions could be reviewed, if requested by one of the new Councilmembers. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried unanimously. (C) -,_LIBRARY SERVICES TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGH END GV�PY i:c9 4 . Acting City ager Rooney reported on public hear- ing held by Stat Senator <hDon November 15, 1993 in the Hermosa---Peachcil Chamber, to gather input from resi isa and Manhattan Beach in regard to the ofy Library reduc- tions. Ms. Rooney.als repthe County will - continue staffing t Publiat the current level (two days week for h) through the end of the 19 -94 fiscal year. _ Mayor gerton directed, with the consensus of -the un- ci , that staff gather information regarding all optio s vailable to the City. City Council Minutes 11-23-93 Page 8359 �r c Motl(Qp Essertier, second Edgerton. unani usly. 2. CONSENT OMINANCES (a) I9 The motion carri ORDINANCE NO. 3-1098 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTtY OF HER- MOSA BEACH CALITORNIA, AMENDING SECTION .5-17 OF THE CABLE TELEVISION YSTEMS OF THE MUNIC AL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Cl er} Elaine Doerfling dated November 2, 1993. Action: To adopt Ordinan N94"93-1098, entitled, '$AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 7.5-17 OF H CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE.' Motion Edgerton, Seco Midstokke. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED F$,6k THE CONSENT CALE DISCUSSION kR FOR SEPARATE - Items1(g (i), (j), (k) and (1) were hea d at this time bu are shown in order for clarity. Pu is comments on items removed from the consent c en -- r are shown under the appropriate items. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT REVISIONS. (Continued from October 12, 1993 and October 26, 1993 meetings.) .%. (a) Planning Commission review and comment on Sections already heard at Public Hearings of October 12, 1993 and October 26, 1993. (b) Continue review on Commercial Space Alternative,, -BZ UDAT recommendations, and proposed expanded Down- town Business Area Enhancement District. The public hearing opened at 7:37 P.M. Coming forward to -address the Council on this item was: Jerry Newton - 2041 Circle Drive, said he had attended in order to speak on this item, but if this item is to be continued, he could return And speak when it was brought back. The public hearing closed at 7:38 P.M. Action: To continue item 4(a) and (b) to the meeting of December 14, 1993 in order to allow the new Council to - make the decisions. _ Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. The second was City Council Minutes 11-09-93 Page 6- C C� qualified by Edgerton to continuing 4(a) only. The mo- tion to continue 4(a) and (b) was then seconded by Benz and carried unanimously. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING WALL Ayt FENCE HEIGHT. With an Ordinance for introduction nd waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Planning Di ec- tor Michael Schubach dated November 1, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staf� report qnd responded to Council questions. The public earing opened at 7:45 P.M/eea ming forw rd to ad- dress the Cou cil on this item were: ete Tucker - 235 24th S, said at painting seals the cement blocd does not allow the moisture to escape, caus the paint to ack and blister anime looks far worse th n unpainted walls;tio ed who would en - for e the aesthetic vf hese walls; Dean Not - 2467 Myrtlesaid he thought this as an unnecesrohibition of gray cement lock walls, thetics were in the eye of a beholdersome were very well done; agre d with theous speaker; felt in the long to paintes would look worse. The public hearing closed at 7:5'�$ P.M Proposed Action: To intruce the Ordinance amended to delete the reference to " 1 in gray untreated block". Motion Edgerton, second May Wiemans, The motion was withdrawn when City At orney se advised that, pursuant to State law with rTeFchange. rd to to amendments, the matter would have to go b to the anning Commission for review of the propo Action:/ously. he Ordinance back �,nhe Planning Com- mission w the Council amendt which deletes the worin gray untreated blor" on line 26, of page of the Ordinance,tence reads, nk fences are prohibited Motion second Mayor Wiemans. car- . ried un.Pro ose To renotice this itemgular meetin of January 11, 1994. Motio Edgerton. The motion was withddate cert in was not required and renoticinlly wou d be done by staff. MUNICIPAL ZATTERS - None 6. / MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Council Minutes 11-09-93 Page 7 8. GP 91-2 -- THIRD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT - referral back from the City Council for review. Staff Recommended Action: To review and comment. Chmn. Di Monda discussed with Mr. Schubach the City Council's discussion regarding parking. Chmn. Di Monda expressed concern that the City Council did not appear aware that parking lots as an allowable use was being created. Parking lots could be built on private property after the buildings were removed. The objective was to rent the vacant stores, not tear down the store fronts and turn them into parking lots. He strongly objected to the inclusion of "on private property" and requested a note be attached for City Council explaining the possible results if this were encouraged. The Commission agreed to this request. The intent of this item was for "public property", not "private property". Chmn. Di Monda and Comm. Suard objected to keeping an area as R-3 when it wasn't; this was not down zoning, but simply being realistic. The Commission suggested this item be forwarded to City Council on November 23, 1993, when the new Council Members would be in attendance. Chmn. Di Monda commented upon Goal #1, Use of Public Right -of -Ways, page 2 and questioned the purpose of an enforcement procedure, to which Mr. Schubach responded, noting a short fast method of enforcement may be ticketing under the encroachment permit, rather than under zoning. He suggested Staff also review the possibility of ticketing on private property. Chmn. Di Monda felt the enforcement procedures should be elaborated upon so that it was clear what the procedures were the City was looking to enforce. Mr. Schubach stated the goal was to find the best method to enforce keeping vehicles of any type out of the areas along the walk streets. Comm. Suard stated the goal should also include items of visual blight. Chmn. Di Monda opened the Hearing at 7:55 p.m. No one wished to speak relating to this item, and Chmn. Di Monda closed the Hearing at 7:55 p.m. The consensus of the Commission was that these changes might be encouraging the demolition of buildings in order to build parking lots, which would be counter-productive. MOTION 0y Comm. Suard, Seconded by Comm. Merl, to incorporate Chmn. Di Monda's comments made during discussion, with the advice of the City Attorney, and present this item at the November 23, 1993 City Council meeting. AYES: Comms. Marks, Merl, Oakes, Suard, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: None - ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Q� Page 4 P.C. Minutes 11-3-93 C J_ 2� CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFO AMENDING SECTION 7.5-17 OF THE CABLE TELEVISION SY EMS THE MUNICIPAL CODE. ActiCity Manager Rooney presented the st,�ff report and re onded to Council questions. Action: T introduce Ordinance No. 93- 98. Motion Esser er, second Edgerton. T motion carried, noting the abs ce of Benz. Final Action: To'Naive full r ding of Ordinance No. 93-1098, entitled, " ORDINAN91t OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AME ING CTION 7.5-17 OF THE CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS OF TH ICIPAL CODE." Motion Essertier, second E AYES: Edgerton, Es rtier, NOES: None ABSENT: Benz rton. tokke, Mayor Wiemans 3. ITEMS REMOVED/FROM THE CONSENT CALEIb&AR FOR SEPARATE 4. DISCUSSION Items 1 (c), (f), (g), and (h) were he d at this time b are shown in order for clarity. Pu iC comments on items removed from the consent c en - r are shown under the appropriate items. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT REVISIONS. (Continued from October 12, 1993 meeting.) Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Councilmember Benz left the meeting at 7:38 P.M. Mayor Wiemans asked to change his vote on area 1 at the meeting of October 12, 1993, stating that he would not want the R-3 area in the north side of town downzoned to R-1. City Attorney Vose said this was not a formal action as the vote taken was a "straw vote" to determine Council interest in proceeding or not upon a course of action for a future public hearing and the vote could be -- changed from 3 to 2, to a 4 to 1 vote to retain R-3 in area 1. City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8329 C CC The public hearing opened at 7:50 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on Parking Vis -A -Vis land Use (page 34) were: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, questioned the proceedings regarding parking if the General Plan were amended (City Attorney Vose said policy decisions were not site specific and that a General Plan amendment is subject to the referendum process once the Resolution is adopted); Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, questioned the perceived emphasis on downtown parking and/ or a parking structure; questioned if the citizens had been adequately informed; ques- tioned the writing of the report; requested a list of parking permits; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., suggested the study be. 'trashed; parking stickers should be for one year; downtown parking lots are not full at night and could be used to more ad- vantage by commercial customers; Roger Carlson - Council candidate, felt that Hermosa could emulate Manhattan Beach and have smaller parking structures that would not be obtrusive. The public hearing closed at 8:07 P.M. Proposed Straw Vote: To remove the Community Center lot from objective 1.2. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. The motion failed due to the objections of Edgerton and Mayor Wiemans and the absence of Benz. Straw Vote: The Council expressed consensus to adding, "...on private property." to objective 1.1. There were no other changes to the draft report. (Benz absent) Coming forward to address the Council with a question regarding the meeting of October 12, 1993 was: Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street spoke regarding I areas 4 and 5 (page 31, heard October 12, 1993) .and the proposed redesignation from Medium Den- sity Residential to Commercial SPA (Specific Plan Area); said the areas had been designated R-2 due to the lack of the parking needed for Commercial and residents' opposition to commer- cial; suggested changing the General Plan to match the zoning. Proposed Straw Vote: To make the areas mixed-use. Motion. Edgerton. The motion died due to the lack of a - second. City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8330 Proposed Straw Vote: tion for the areas. Motion Mayor Wiemans. of a second. To continue with the R-2 designa- The motion died due to the lack Proposed Action: To reconsider the designation for areas 4 and 5. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Es- sertier and the absence of Benz. The public hearing opened at 8:33 P.M. Seeing no one come for- ward to address the Council on Open Space/Public Facilities Designation (page 34-35) the public hearing closed at 8:33 P.M. The Council made no changes to the draft report. The public hearing opened at 8:39 P.M. Seeing no one come for- ward to address the Council on Uses of Public Rights -of -Way for Private Purposes (page 35-36) the public hearing closed at 8:39 P.M. Action: To reopen the public hearing to allow public testimony from residents wishing to speak. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz. The public hearing was reopened at 8:44 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on Uses of Public Rights -of -Way for Private Purposes was: Chuck Sheldon - 1800 The Strand, spoke regarding the bureaucratic cost to the City for the is- suance and enforcement of encroachment permits for the small number of Strand owners involved. Straw Vote: To approve Objectives 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 for Goal 1, and to add Objective 1.4 to read, "Prior to using the vacation method or enforcement permit method process for unused public right-of-way areas, a thorough examination of the method of implementation, i.e. en- croachment procedure, shall be made to determine the most effective procedure and shall be made a criterion in deciding which method shall be used-" • Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the objection of Mayor Wiemans and the absence of Benz. Straw vote: To amend Goal 1 to read, "To evaluate all City right-of-ways to determine whether or not there is any future public use and which right-of-ways could pos- sibly.be controlled through encroachment permit process or vacated to decrease visual blight." City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8331 Motion Edgerton, ried, noting the absence of Benz. CC second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car - dissenting vote of Midstokke and the The public hearing opened at 9:07 P.M. Seeing no one come for- ward to address the Council on Property Maintenance (page 36) the public hearing closed at 9:07 P.M. The Council made no changes to the draft report. The public hearing opened at 9:11 P.M. Seeing no one come for- ward to address the Council on Design Review (page 36-37) the public hearing closed at 9:11 P.M. Straw Vote: To approve the draft report to include the City Attorney's amendment of Goal 1 to read, "...when a proposed project is located within their jurisdictional boundaries." and the amendment of Objective 1 to include the phrase excluding single family homes after Specific Plan Area (SPA). Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car- ried, noting the absence of Benz. The public hearing opened at 9:14 P.M. Seeing no one come for- ward to address the Council on Historic Preservation (page 38) the public hearing closed at 9:14 P.M. Straw Vote: To approve the draft report as amended in Implementation Policy 1.2 to delete, at the end of the sentence, "...made non-profit for tax purposes as an incentive." and substitute, "...should be afforded the opportunity for property tax exemption.11 Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, that the remainder of item 4 be continued to the meeting of November 9, 1993. (Benz absent) The meeting recessed at 9:19 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:38 P.M. and returned the order of the agenda to item 1. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. QUARTERL`? 'F Public Works 1993. TUS OF C.I.P. PROJECTS. M andum from ector Amy Amirani ed October 19, - Public Works Direct o Irani p ented the staff report and respondedt uncil questions. - Actio . To approve the staff recommendation to ceive aTrd-file the report showing 25 fiscal year 1993-94 City Council Minutes 10-26-93 Page 8332 — (o Valley Drive to two-way traffic from Second Street Herondo. Motion '-Essertier, second Midstokke. The motio carried unanimous At 7:45 P.M. the order o the agenda was sus ended to go to the public hearing, Item 4. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - Non 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM .THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(a),, -----(h), (i) , (j) , and (k) we heard at this time but -are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the onsent calendar are shown under the appropriate item PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS: LAND USE ELEMENT REVISIONS, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach, dated October 5, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose suggested the Council consider each section of the Land Use Element revisions separately. The public hearing opened at 7:55 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on General Goals. Objectives and Implementation Poli- cies (page 28-31) was: Gene Dreher - 1222 Second Place, Council candidate, asked where the public could have a copy of the report in order to follow the Council --delibera- tions; suggested more information, or a presen- tation, be available to the public. The public hearing closed at 8:00 P.M. The Council made no changes to the draft report. The public hearing opened at 8:05 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on Current Land Use Element (page 31) was: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, asked if there could be Council discussion before the public input; objected to greater commercialization of the downtown; objected to a parking structure or anything that would bring in more traffic. The public hearing closed at 8:10 P.M. .-- City Council Minutes 10-12-93 Page 8314 The Council made no changes to the draft report. The public hearing opened at 8:14 P.M. Seeing no one come for- ward to address the Council on Inconsistencies Between Zoning and General Plan Map (page 31-32) the public hearing closed at 8:14 P.M. The Council made no changes to the draft report. The public hearing opened at 8:32 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on Building Intensity/Population Density Standards (page 32-33) was: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, said that low density was desirable; questioned what was being done tonight as he did not want decisions made tonight. The public hearing closed at 8:35 P.M. The Council made no changes to the draft report. The public hearing opened at 8:49 P.M. Coming forward to address_ the Council on Land Use Designation Revisions (page 33) were: Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street, questioned area 4; and, Ruth'Brand - 1231 First Street, asked what the dif- ference was between R -P and R-3. The public hearing closed at 8:55 P.M. Is Straw Vote: To leave Area 1 as R-3. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Mayor Wiemans. Proposed Straw Vote: To leave Area 2 as R -P. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. Councilmember Edgerton asked the City Attorney if he could vote on this issue as he owned property in the area. City Attorney Vose ruled that Edgerton's property ownership was a conflict; at that time, 8:58.P.M., Edgerton withdrew his second and left the dais and the room. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Straw Vote: To approve the staff recommendation for Area 2. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Essertier. The motion car- ried, noting the absence of Edgerton. Councilmember Edgerton returned to the dais at 8:59 P.M. The meeting recessed at 9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:22 P.M. City Council Minutes 10-12-93 Page 8315 The public hearing opened at 9:27 P.M. Seeing no one come for- ward to address' the Council on Land Use and Structural Defini- tions (page 33-34) the public hearing closed at 9:27 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car- ried unanimously. Final Action: To continue the remainder of the items to the Regular Meeting of October 26, 1993. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Midstokke. At 9:30 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to item 2. MUNICIPAL MATTERS S. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR TJfE OIL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach, dated October 6, 1993. Acting City Manager Rooney presented the taff report and responded to Council questions. Pla ning Director Schubac also responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To delay this item ,,ppending an opinion from the Coastal Commission legal apartment regarding co -applicants.\ Motion Midstokke The motion die due to the lack of a second. / Coming forward tory address the'Council Oft/this item was: Don Macpherson - o4l developer, responded to Coun- cil questions; said he had posted the $50,000 bond. x City Attorney Vose responded o Council questions; said the City acting as applicant wo ld have no affect on the City's liability; suggested adds g a phrase to clarify that before drawing on the money �$osted as a bond, Mr. Macpherson be giv6n .written notice and if payment was not received within ten days, the moey then be drawn upon. Action: To/approve the City filing as an \ypplicant be- fore the Coastal Commission and approve the\\ ddition of the City Atorney's clarifying phrase that Mr Macpher - son be given 'ten days written notice of th City's request for the money posted, and if payment 's not received within that time, to then draw on the lett r of credit. - Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. The motion; carried, noting the dissenting vote of Midstokke. City Council Minutes 10-12-93 Page 8316 C Resolution P.C. 93-63, A RESOLUTION OFTHE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TI! --E TY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, approving a miniature windmill a Pier Aven Alta Dena Dairy. Referencing both the Minut and Resolution P.C. 93-63, Comm. Suar stated he had voted "no" on the motion pertaining to approva CUP 90-22. MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Co es, to APPROVE the September 21, 1993 Minutes and Resolution P.C. 93-63 with the f wing nge: Motion vote to approve CUP 90-22 is to reflect a "NO" vote by Comm. Suar . AYES: Comms._�4•a'rks, Merl, Oakes, Suard, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: No ABSENT: one ABS . None 4.c. Resolution P.C. 93-64, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, recommending approval of the 1993 Land Use Element revision as an amendment to the General Plan. Comm. Suard stated the Commission had approved the following additions: (1) "and quality of life" at the end of Goal #3 and (2) page 8, Primary Objective #1 "and decreasing visual blight". Comm. Suard stated that on page 9, the entire objective was to have been deleted, with rewording to include design review within only specific zones determined by the Commission, to which Mr. Schubach noted page 10 addressed this issue. Comm. Suard stated the Commission did not want design review into site plans, noting the verbiage was too specific. He suggested Primary Objective #2 read, "Incorporate design review into major public works and review procedures for open space and S.P.A. and other appropriate zones." He felt the objective on page 10 was all right. Comm. Oakes did not agree with this suggestion, noting people were given freedom of action. Chmn. Di Monda commented he had specifically discussed the S.P.A. zone. Comm. Merl suggesting dropping the implementation of #2.2 and being more specific; Primary Objective #2 should state, "incorporate design review into the S.P.A. zones and mljor capitol improvement projects." Comm. Suard noted page 10, Historic Preservation, Implementation Policy 1.2, stated a premature conclusion. The Commission agreed mandatory preservation was not legal. Comm. Suard discussed with the Commissioners the right-of-way issue, page 8, Objective 1.1, noting a Councilman had stated to him that parking could not be controlled on the City right-of-ways due to the zoning ordinance. Mr. Schubach explained the actual situation being experienced within the City, noting the Zoning Code was - silent, technically, and clarification as to where parking was allowed needed to be clarified within the Code. Chmn. Di Monda stated the Police Chief strongly recommended this be made a parking infraction in terms of enforcement, recommending this change, to which the Commission agreed. Mr. Schubach stated the Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code were where enforcement tools and specifics - ((+ — P.C. Minutes 10-05-93 c should be located. The Land Use Element should not contain that amount of detail. The Commission agreed to recommend this be made a parking infraction and be contained within the parking element and a general statement be made within this document as a "parking vis-a-vis land use", stating the citation process shall be used for violations of the ordinance." Comm. Suard requested a generic statement bemadeafterthe zoning ordinance stating ...... and any other appropriate ordinances", to which the Commission agreed. The Commission discussed the fact that corrections could be made, but not changes. Mr. Schubach commented that a law suit was in process on this same issue. The City Attorney had been contacted relating to two problems: a confidential memorandum received by the Council regarding a law suit against the City and the objectives and goals, as written. The City Attorney is determining if the Commission's viewing of that document would upset the attorney/client privacy. He also felt the objective and goals would not impact the law suit, since it directed a study and not action. Chmn. Di Monda responded the Commission would forward this item to the Council, who would act appropriately based upon the City Attorney's input. Comms. Suard and Oakes felt the Commission was not being provided the necessary information for the decision-making process. MOTION by Comm. Suard, Seconded by Comm. Oakes, to APPROVE Resolution P.C. 93-64 with the addition of the revisions discussed by the Commission during this meeting. AYES: Comms. Marks, Merl, Oakes, Suard, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 5. Items for consideration None ORA No one wished to speak relating to ubject not on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. SS 92-1 -- SPECIAL DY AND TEXT A`I.>�NDMENT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL FE ES ALONG VALLEY DRIVE/AR ORE AVENUE, AND ADOPTION NENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLA TION (continued from Augu 17 and September 21, 1993 meetings). Recommended Action: To recommend approval of the text amendment and adoption o tive Declaration. - r5— P.C. Minutes 10-05-93 October 27, 1993 ` Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission November 3, 1993 (REFERRED BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MODIFICATIONS) SUBJECT: LAND USE ELEMENT REVISION Recommendation Review the further modifications to the text as described below. Background At their meeting of October 12 and October 26, the City Council reviewed the recommendations of the staff and the Planning Commission regarding the text of the revised Land Use Element. The Council did not have any major objections to any part of the Element, and is prepared to adopt it with the noted modifications. Analysis The Council's modifications were as follows: LAND USE DESIGNATION REVISIONS Eliminate Primary Objective 1 which states: "Consider a low density or Specific Plan Area designation in Area I because of substandard lot sizes" The Council voted 4:1 to eliminate this objective, and thus supporting maintaining the area as R-3 PARKING VIS-A-VIS LAND USE Implementation Objective 2.1: modify to read as follows: "Allow private sector construction and operation of downtown public parking structures on private property." USES OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR PRIVATE PURPOSES GOAL 1: modify to read as follows: "To evaluate all City Rights -of -Way to determine whether or not there is any future public use and which rights-of-way could possibly be controlled through the encroachment permit process or vacated to decrease visual blight. OBJECTIVE 1.4: add the following objective: - 1�- "Prior to either using the vacation me(nod, or the encroachment permit process for unused public right-of-way areas, a thorough examination of the method of implementation, i.e., enforcement procedure, shall be made to determine the most effective procedure, and shall be made a criterion in deciding which method should be used." DESIGN REVIEW GOAL 1: Pursuant to the recommendation of the City Attorney, modify as follows: "The Downtown Area Enhancement Commission should review all major development plans prior to discretionary approval or implementation when a proposed project is located within their jurisdictional boundaries PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 2: modify as follows: "Incorporate design review into the regular site plan review procedures of the Planning Commission for Specific Plan Area Zones excluding single family homes, and major Capital Improvement Projects HISTORIC PRESERVATION Implementation Policy 1.2: Participation in any program shall be voluntary and if possible, a building that qualifies for historical preservation should be made non-profit for tax purposes afforded opportunities for tax exemption -as an incentive. Michael Schubach Planning Director - 11 - r J --MAXIMUft COMMERCIAL SPACE ALTERNATIVE I. General/Purpose This alternative would encourage the utilization of the commercial zone and decrease the parking requirements to maximize the amount of commercial space. R.--- 7=.. Amortization of nonconforming residential uses is considered to be the most realistic approach to maximizing downtown commercial space. Allowing greater building heights in downtown is not feasible with the November 1991 voter approval of Proposition I, a local initiative which lowered commercial building heights in the C-2 zone (the downtown zoning designation) to 30 feet from 35 feet. Converting the existing downtown parking lots to - commercial uses would simply exacerbate the existing public parking shortage, possibly discouraging shoppers from patronizing downtown merchants. Expanding the downtown commercial district boundaries by redesignating residential properties adjacent to the downtown periphery to GC General Commercial is not considered feasible by staff.due to the following practical difficulties: 1. Market forces do not justify expanding the amount of land in a downtown district that has been economically depressed since the 1950's and, with a few notable exceptions, is characterized by marginal retail establishments and constant business turnovers. 2. Several downtown commercial properties are presently used for residential purposes, and have been residential in character for many years, indicating a greater demand for residential than commercial uses in and around downtown. 3. The existing residential properties abutting the downtown district are presently fully developed for residential uses. Redesignation of these residential properties would create legal nonconforming structures, with the associated restrictions on structural improvements/expansions, and possibly lead to displacement of renters. 4. The adjacent residential properties are of diminutive proportions by today's standards, reflecting the period of the City's history in which these properties were originally subdivided. Construction of any multi -tenant commercial space would require lot consolidation efforts that would be difficult for the private sector alone Amortization of nonconforming residential uses is considered to be the most realistic approach to maximizing downtown commercial space. Allowing greater building heights in downtown is not feasible with the November 1991 voter approval of Proposition I, a local initiative which lowered commercial building heights in the C-2 zone (the downtown zoning designation) to 30 feet from 35 feet. Converting the existing downtown parking lots to - commercial uses would simply exacerbate the existing public parking shortage, possibly discouraging shoppers from patronizing downtown merchants. Expanding the downtown commercial district boundaries by redesignating residential properties adjacent to the downtown periphery to GC General Commercial is not considered feasible by staff.due to the following practical difficulties: 1. Market forces do not justify expanding the amount of land in a downtown district that has been economically depressed since the 1950's and, with a few notable exceptions, is characterized by marginal retail establishments and constant business turnovers. 2. Several downtown commercial properties are presently used for residential purposes, and have been residential in character for many years, indicating a greater demand for residential than commercial uses in and around downtown. 3. The existing residential properties abutting the downtown district are presently fully developed for residential uses. Redesignation of these residential properties would create legal nonconforming structures, with the associated restrictions on structural improvements/expansions, and possibly lead to displacement of renters. 4. The adjacent residential properties are of diminutive proportions by today's standards, reflecting the period of the City's history in which these properties were originally subdivided. Construction of any multi -tenant commercial space would require lot consolidation efforts that would be difficult for the private sector alone even in a healthy economy with strong local market demand. Given the lack of demand for additional downtown commercial space, private sector commitment to this type of commercial development would be remote at best. II. Potential Advantages 1. Larger stock of downtown commercial structures provides opportunity for greater variety of retailers and greater selection of retail goods 2. New commercial construction would result in greater property tax revenues 3. Greater shopping opportunities that could attract a larger and more diversified shopper base 4. Opportunity for greater sales and business license tax revenues 5. Potential for increased employment opportunities 6. Promote downtown as a unified shopping district characterized by a variety of restaurants and specialty shops III. Potential Disadvantages 1. Reduction in housing stock that could adversely impact City's supply of low and moderate income housing units 2. Potential increase in alcohol-related commercial uses 3. Greater intensification of day and night-time shoppers could create conflicts with nearby residents in terms of parking, accessibility, noise and lighting spillover effects IV. Existing Downtown Conditions The addresses, Assessor Parcel Numbers, lot square footage, existing land uses, and conditions of existing structures for all commercially zoned downtown properties that are presently used only for residential purposes are listed in Appendix A. Many residential structures on these properties exhibit signs of deferred maintenance. Downtown presently has a total land area of 757,606 square feet and total floor area of 344,852 square feet for a total floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.46:1. Downtown presently has a total of 1,583 public and private parking spaces. V. Future Downtown Conditions - 40 - The following floor space estimates represent the maximum potential commercial development that the entire downtown could support under current zoning standards. The calculations on maximum build -out for the entire downtown are based on the following assumptions: - All future downtown commercial structures would be developed to provide the maximum amount of floor space possible, in conformance with the existing 30 foot height limitations, while allowing adequate space on the property for the full provision of all required off-street parking spaces, either at ground level of above ground. No non-commercial developments on any downtown properties (in order to estimate the maximum amount of retail floor space possible under current zoning). Commercial uses are broken down into two major categories, retail/office and restaurant, for convenient analysis. These retail and restaurant categories are distinguished by different off-street parking requirements: one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area for retail/office uses and one space per 100 square feet of gross floor area for restaurant uses. For calculation purposes, each required parking space represents 400 square feet of floor in order to account for all parking stall, aisle and drive area space needed for an adequate parking lot. This 400 square foot per space average is a recommended standard that comes from APA Report Number 405, New Residential Standards for Nonresidential Uses, 1987. Restaurants currently make up approximately 23% of all floor space in downtown. This scenario assumes that the downtown retail mix will retain roughly the same proportion of restaurants, with restaurants making up 25% of total downtown land and the remaining 75% devoted to general retail/office uses. TABLE 7 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL RETAIL/OFFICE DEVELOPMENT (75% OF DOWNTOWN) (Square Feet) Total Total Total Land Area Floor Area Parking Area 568,205 6551621 1,048,993 TABLE 8 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT (25o OF DOWNTOWN) (Square Feet) Total Land Area 189,401 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL Total Land Area 757,606 Total Floor Area 113,641 TABLE 9 COMBINED COMMERCIAL (Square Feet) Total Floor Area 769,262 Total Parking Area 454,563 USES DEVELOPMENT Total Parking Area 1,503,556 The total number of parking spaces required for the maximum potential downtown development would be 2,622 retail/office spaces and 1,136 restaurant spaces. The parking area allocation only assumes that all spaces are off-street and above ground, with no determination on the potential ratio of surface level spaces to parking structure spaces. This determination is not necessary for aggregate projections since parking for some commercial land uses may be within the same parcels or entirely on separate parcels. Therefore, the FAR for any given parcel could theoretically be as much as 3:1 or under 1:1. The aggregate FAR for the entire downtown under this scenario is approximately 1.02:1; which represents the total floor space of all retail/office and restaurant land uses divided by the total land area of all downtown properties. The future potential development of uses consistent with the C-2 zoning for these properties would mean the loss of 77 existing dwelling units. Applying the 1990 Census average of 1.98 persons per household for the City, this could result in the displacement of 152 local residents. VI. Potential Environmental Impacts Traffic/Circulation - The loss of existing residential units on the downtown commercially zoned properties would reduce the overall number of residential vehicle trips but would create the potential for additional shopper and downtown employee vehicle trips. Assuming that these commercially zoned properties are developed for retail uses rather than office uses, this would result in less vehicles trips during weekday AM and PM peak commuting periods and more vehicle trips during evening and weekend shopping hours. Based on an average of 3 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of gross commercial retail floor area on a weekday and an average of 5 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of gross commercial retail floor area on a weekend day (Trip Generation, 4th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers), the maximum potential future commercial development for the entire downtown under this scenario could result in approximately 2,308 Average Daily Trips (ADT) on a weekday and 3,846 ADT on a weekend day. In comparison, the existing 344,852 square feet of commercial floor space in the existing downtown would generate 1,035 weekday ADT and 1,724 weekend ADT. Assuming that the existing 77 dwelling units in downtown each have two commuters that result in four weekday trips per unit and that weekend travel patterns result in six trips per unit on a weekend day, the existing downtown residential uses generate 308 weekday ADT and 462 weekend ADT. The present land uses in downtown therefore generate approximately 1,343 weekday ADT and 2,186 weekend ADT. Under this scenario, maximum commercial development would result in a 72% increase in weekday ADT and a 76% increase in weekend ADT, which would result in significant traffic volume increases. These calculations do not account for beach visitor trips, since it is assumed that these trips would occur regardless of the amount of commercial downtown space. Air and Noise - Since total vehicle ADT could significantly increase with future commercial development, this scenario could result in significant mobile air and noise impacts. There may also be significant increases in evening and weekend pedestrian noise impacts from future additional commercial retail space. Since a large portion of this new commercial development would be located on properties along the downtown periphery, there is a potential for significant noise impacts on nearby residences from shopper activities, particularly during late evening and weekend shopping hours. Public Services/Utilities - The replacement of existing residential uses on commercially zoned properties with commercial uses would increase the demand for police services, particularly if the future commercial uses involve activities that have higher police call rates, e.g. establishments with on -sale alcohol licenses. There is no accurate method of estimating the additional demand for police services, since a great many variables would determine the increased demand, such as the number of businesses with alcohol licenses, the hours of operation, the layout and intensity of new construction., and the time of day and season of the year. However, under maximum build -out it could be anticipated that growth in downtown businesses could result in a need for a regular dedication of two full-time officers and a'patrol car or even the establishment of a downtown police substation, staffed by a minimum of a commander, two officers per shift, and at least two support personnel. Depending on the type of future commercial uses, there could also be an increase in solid waste generation, since many types of retail and office uses result in greater quantities of discarded - 43 - paper and other refuse than residential uses, resulting in a greater demand for refuse collection services. The loss of residential units could mean a decrease in the demand for school, library, health care, water and sewer services, since residential uses typically have greater demands for these types of services than most commercial uses. The demand for fire protection services, particularly fire inspections, would increase with the additional commercial development. Population/Housing - As previously mentioned, this scenario would result in a loss of 77 existing residential units and the displacement of about 152 residents, based on the 1990 Census average of 1.98 persons per household for the City. This would represent approximately 0.8% of the total 9,689 housing units and 0.8% of the total 18,219 residents for the City as reported by the 1990 Census. To the extent that some of these dwelling units could be considered affordable for low or moderate income households, any loss of such units could be considered a significant impact. However, given the high land value of beachfront property, it is unlikely that the rental rates or purchase prices of these existing residential units would be within the low and moderate income ranges. Earth - Assuming that all future development would not involve any underground construction for parking garages or basements, any potential soil or ground surface disruptions would be limited to grading activities during the initial construction phases. Any changes in downtown topography and ground surface relief features would only potentially involve minor landscaping features, e.g. decorative slopes, on individual properties. Water - Future commercial development on properties presently used for residential purposes could result in some increases in impervious surfaces, since existing residential lawns could be replaced with building or pavement cover. Although this could result in an increase in the rate and amount of surface water runoff and a decrease in the current absorption rates, the impacts would be less than significant since only a small amount of total land would be subject to potential conversion from open space to impervious surfaces. There would be no change in any potential exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves. Aesthetics/Recreation - Maximum development could result in higher commercial structures than the existing one and -two story residential structures on these commercially zoned properties. Since the existing residential structures are all below the maximum height of 30 feet allowed in the C-2 zone, future commercial development could potentially obstruct some scenic views from surrounding properties. This would be considered a less than significant impact, however, since all development would be in conformance with the C-2 zoning standards. Potential commercial development would not have an impact on the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities since the change in uses on these properties would not impact beach access. - W+ - Historic/Cultural Resources - Since none of the existing residential structures on these commercially zoned properties are considered to be of local historic significance, there would not be any impacts to historic sites, structures, buildings or objects. VII. Fiscal Impacts Based on the 1990 Census median value of $431,000 for owner -occupied units, the 77 dwelling units located on commercially zoned downtown properties would have a total assessed value of $33,187,000. This assessed valuation would provide the City with approximately $79,649 in annual property tax revenues, based on the $0.24 for every dollar of the basic 1% property tax levy allocated to the City. However, since many of the existing residential structures are older buildings and may be assessed at artificially low values if there have been no property improvements or resales in recent years, most of these residential structures probably have assessed valuations below the City median, particularly in the case of older multi -unit structures. Due to the beachfront locations of these properties, most of the assessed valuation would be for the land value rather than the improvement value. Therefore, it is probable that new commercial construction would result in higher assessed values that would produce greater property tax revenues for the City. There are a total of 14 commercial parcels in downtown, totaling approximately 38,228 square feet, that are presently used for residences only. The maximum potential commercial development of these parcels would yield about 38,993 square feet of commercial floor space, applying the FAR of 1.02:1 that results from maximum development when all required parking spaces are provided on these parcels at or above ground. Full commercial development could result in approximately $37,039 in annual sales tax revenues, estimated by multiplying the total square feet of retail and restaurant floor space by $0.9499, which is the current amount of annual sales tax revenue per square foot of gross floor space for downtown. Depending upon the type of future commercial uses, this scenario could result in several thousand dollars in business license fee revenues to the City annually. These fees are based on total gross receipts for most retail operations and on total floor space for retailers with an on -sale alcohol license. VIII. Potential Coastal Commission Reaction The replacement of nonconforming residential uses with commercial uses may be consistent with Coastal Commission policies depending upon the type of future commercial uses. Visitor -serving commercial recreational uses, e.g. gift shops, would be given a higher priority by the Commission than office uses. The California Coastal Act of 1976, Section 30222, states that "the use of private lands suitable for visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities for coastal recreation shall have priority over private residential, general industrial, or general commercial development". Although the Coastal Act does not specifically define "visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities," the City's Land Use Element currently defines commercial recreational land uses as various commercial activities such as bowling alleys, motels, theaters, entertainment establishments, night-clubs, shops and similar businesses. The establishment of any of these types of commercial uses could be expected to be supported by the Commission. IX. Relationship to R/UDAT The Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team (R/UDAT) program, sponsored by the American Institute of Architects (AIA), has recently completed a team study of downtown Hermosa Beach. The purpose of the R/UDAT study is to identify key issues through workshops and community input sessions in order to develop a conceptual action plan for downtown revitalization. The intent of this alternative, to increase the amount of commercial development in the downtown, would be consistent with the economic revitalization goals of the R/UDAT study. Specific R/UDAT recommendations such as the sale and commercial development of the Biltmore site is consistent with a downtown revitalization approach that favors the maximum utilization of downtown properties. X. Implementation Any implementation of this alternative would require an amortization program to successfully induce any additional downtown commercial uses. The lack of an amortization program would allow the opportunity for the existing nonconforming uses to continue indefinitely. However, even with an amortization program, the lack of market demand for additional downtown commercial space could make implementation difficult (otherwise market forces alone would have resulted in the replacement of these nonconforming -residential structures with commercial uses) GOAL A. Maximize commercial uses on downtown commercial properties. OBJECTIVES A. No expansion of the downtown nonconforming uses and encourage businesses to more effeciently use the commercial potential of the downtown district. B. Encourage new businesses and more efficient commercial space utilization of downtown district. The following is a list of the R/UDAT guidelines to be used as a basis for the planning of the downtown district: - L-6 - 1. Downtown Business District needs more landscaping to soften the expance of pavement and make the area more pleasant for pedestrians. 2. The street plantings on Pier Avenue should be different from Hermosa Avenue. Street tree plantings should be moved from the center of the street to the sidewalk to soften the commercial facades. 3. In the curved, sloping section of Pier avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Manhattan Avenue a different, smaller type of street tree should be used to avoid blocking views of the water. 4. The bike path needs to be separated from the Strand for safety reasons. 5. Increase police foot patrols. 6. Increase outdoor dining and family entertainment activity where appropriate. 7. Provide streetscape amenities. 8. Create more sidewalk area and a plaza area at the pierhead. 9. Reduce noise impacts of bars and restaurants. 10. Connect through to parking behind buildings, creating through block retail arcades if possible. 11. A traffic circulation scheme should be provided at the Pier Avenue / Strand junction which gives easy access to parking areas. The recommended scheme allows drivers to go to the end of Pier Avenue and park there if space is available. If not, they can turn right to Lot C, or left to Lot A. 12. Manage the parking supply to reduce conflicts between residents, beach goers, and customers. 13. Provide sufficient off and on -street parking to support existing commercial uses and their proposed growth. 14. Provide beach -goers parking to the extent which is practically feasible, but never below the levels decreed by the Coastal Commission. 15. Fringe parking should be provided and its use promoted for beach goers, employees and overflow resident parking. 16. The zoning in downtown should be amended to allow businesses to expand without providina reauired parkina for old or new uses. 17. Better information should be provided on visitor narkina maps with an explanation of fees. 18. The pedestrian environment should be improved on streets leading to fringe parking facilities, amenities, store fronts, etc.,and should be designed to encourage the use of these routes. 19. Pier Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and the beach should be modified to allow for more of an emphasis on pedestrian activities in this socially active zone. 20. Underground all utilities. 21. Diversify the types of businesses to include a greater number and variety of speciality shops, including gift, art and apparel shops, along Pier Avenue, the Strand, and other east -west streets. 22. Redesign of the pierhead area to improve the appearance of the pier structure and provide plaza -like setting for outdoor events. 23. Revision of the traffic circulation pattern to provide a single one-way traffic lane with angled parking west of Hermosa Avenue. This revision provides more space for the pedestrian and room for outdoor cafes. - c/expanddn - T9 - Ekpandad DownTown o usinass Araa EnhancamanT DkTrW R-3 R-3 R-3 Hermosa a Avenue >: <> r 5 4 3 1 0 t t >' t A ...................... t t R-3 h R- V .:.;:.;:.: h R- R-2 R- S S :.:::::. s :::::.:::. :.;;::.; e .::::::. S t O.S.-2 a '.> :.: R-2 a qtr ho r n Beach h .......::. p i e rcaJe• NTS - 60- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1993 LAND USE ELEMENT REVISION AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on October 12, 1993, as part of the third quarter General Plan amendments to consider the Land Use Element Revision and made the following findings: A. The last revision to the Land Use Element of the General Plan was in 1979; B. In the present form the current 1979 Land Use Element does not meet the minimum State law requirements; C. The 1993 Land Use Element Revision meets all State mandated requirements set forth in Government Code Section 65302 (a); D. The 1993 Land Use Element Revision is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby adopt the 1993 Land Use Element Revision as an amendment to the General Plan. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day__of 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY -35-- p/lueccrs January 12, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council 'January 25, 1994 UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Direct staff to proceed with the preparation of necessary documents to create an Underground District for the recommended project. 2. Approve an appropriation of $10,000 from prospective expenditures to CIP 93-145. Background: At the joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting in July 1993, staff was directed to proceed with researching the possibility of undergrounding utilities in the City of Hermosa Beach. At the City Council meeting of October 12, 1993, staff was directed to revisit this item at a later date. Analysis: The staff, with assistance from Bob Jensen, Area Manager for Southern California Edison, has evaluated the City's undergrounding needs and has established a plan for underground conversion in Hermosa Beach. The areas which show the highest priority for undergrounding are Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway, Pacific Coast Highway from Artesia Boulevard to Aviation Boulevard and Beach Drive from Herondo to 24th Street. Cost estimates for these three priority projects are as follows: 1. Pier Avenue - Hermosa Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway $ 345,200 2. Pacific Coast Highway - Artesia Blvd. to Aviation $ 518,800 3. Beach Drive - Herondo Avenue to 24th Street $1,136,000 TOTAL $2,000,000 Each of the proposed projects will require two years to complete following the City's passage of a Resolution establishing the Underground District. -= s The City Code procedures necessary for the establishment of an Underground District are as follows: 1. The City Council directs the Public Works Director to prepare a report delineating the boundaries of the District and the costs to the City and affected property owners. 2. City Council calls for a public hearing to ascertain whether public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires establishment of a District. Notices of such a hearing must be given to the affected property owners at least 10 days prior to the hearing date. 3. After the public hearing, the City Council can establish the District by Council Resolution. 4. Within 10 days of establishment of the District by Resolution, the City shall notify the affected property owners of the creation of the District. 5._ The undergrounding project is designed and constructed by Southern California Edison. 6. Underground service connections are installed by private contract with affected property owners. 7. Property owners who have not converted their old services to new underground services are notified, if not completed in the specified time, the City will provide the required facilities and the cost thereof shall be assessed against the benefited property and becomes a lien upon such property. 8. Removal of overhead facilities are performed by Southern California Edison. Southern California Edison, operating under the California Public Utility Commission Rule 20A has made a yearly allocation of $131,574 available to the City of Hermosa Beach for underground utility projects. The current balance in the City of Hermosa Beach Rule 20A account is $427,929. Southern California Edison has implemented a program whereby public agencies may borrow against future 20A allocations. Mr. Jensen has indicated that existing and future Rule 20A funding in the neighborhood of $2,000,000 would be available to the City of Hermosa Beach for undergrounding projects. If the City borrows against future 20A funds it would probably be ten years before Rule 20A funds would again become available to the City for further undergrounding projects. Costs to affected property owners would amount to those required to connect each house service to the newly installed underground main vaults. Estimates for such costs would be approximately $500 to $1,200 per property. These costs cannot be covered by Rule 20A funds because improvements lie on private property. - 2 - Property owners will be assessed for the connection fee by establishment of the Underground District. Funding: The undergrounding of the three proposed priority projects on Pier Avenue, Pacific Coast Highway and Beach Drive will not require City funding beyond that required for engineering administration and inspection costs. The cost to the affected property owners for connection to the proposed undergrounding will be in the neighborhood of $500 - $1,200 per property. The FY 93-94 budget does not include funds for this project. Fiscal Impact: In order to prepare the necessary documents to create the three Underground Utility Districts, consultant services of $10,000 will be required. Respectfully submitted, Concur: / oseph Manka ich CIP Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/UNDERGRD - 3 - Q,PK,y &gmam--= Amy Amirani Director of.Public Works Concur: 09 Ste en Burrell City Manager To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the Council Date: January 25, 1994 Council Meeting From: Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission Re: Biltmore Park Per previous Council direction, the Parks Recreation and Community Resources Commission has not been formally included as part of the review process for this conceptual park plan. Recognizing Council's sentiments to proceed as quickly as possible with park construction, the Commission still feels that public input and Commission review is a vital link in formalizing the ultimate park plan. We stand ready, willing and able to review these designs and take public input at the Commission level and encourage you to schedule a public hearing on the issue at a Council meeting. Parks endure for generations. Careful planning and community involvement at the beginning will serve the City well in the long run. Thank you for your time and consideration. Steven A. Crecy Chairperson SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 Honora le;Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council BILTMORE PARR ALTERNATIVES CIP 92-523 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: January 18, 1994 Regular Meeting of January 25, 1994 1. Approve the suggested conceptual plan for the Biltmore Park site. 2. Approve an appropriation of $6,000 from the Biltmore Park Project, CIP 92-523, to obtain landscape architectural services to provide working drawings for the park development. 3. Approve an expenditure of approximately $60,000 from the Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project, CIP 92-408, for the design and construction of that portion of sewer which extends through the Park site. Background: At the City Council meeting of September 14, 1993, a recommendation to examine alternatives for construction of Biltmore Park was approved by the City Council. City Council at the September 28, 1993 meeting made the following recommendations: 1. Remove the parking lot located between 15th Street and 15th Court. 2. Remove Beach Drive between 14th Street and 15th Street. 3. Remove the westerly 60' of 15th Court. 4. Do not construct a cul-de-sac at the new terminus of 15fh Court. 5. Provide additional alternatives to the proposed design concepts. Acting upon these recommendations staff prepared a demolition and grading plan for the Biltmore site. Upon City Council approval of these plans the City entered into a contract with J&G Industries to perform the defined demolition. The demolition contract was successfully completed on January 6, 1994 and the site was prepared for the next phase of construction. - 1 - 1. 4 IV Analysis: The next steps in the development of the Biltmore Park site are: 1. The undergrounding of existing Southern California Edison and General Telephone lines. 2. The upgrading of existing infrastructures. 3. Preparation of Park improvement plans. 4. Construction of the Park improvements. Undergrounding: Southern California Edison has initiated preparation of the plans for the undergrounding of their utilities. General Telephone has been in contact with Southern California Edison and typically joins forces with Edison in these undergrounding projects. Plans for the undergrounding of both utilities are due to be completed by the end of January. Construction is scheduled to begin in early March and should be complete by the end of that month. The costs of this construction will be negotiated with the affected agencies. Infrastructures: California Water Service Company has completed removal of valves that had serviced the old hotel. The water main is not scheduled for replacement. Southern California Gas Company is preparing plans for the removal and replacement of the existing 6" main which was installed in 1923. Plans are expected to be complete by the end of January, 1994. Construction of this new line is expected to be completed by the beginning of March. The City sewer main that runs along the centerline of Beach Drive from 14th Street to 16th Court is due for replacement. The Public Works Department has begun preparation of plans for this project and expect these plans to be complete by the second week in February, 1994. The estimated cost for the replacement of 420 L.F. of 10" sewer main is $60,000.00. Park Concept Plans: Attached please find the two preferred alternatives for the Biltmore Park site. Alternative 1 represents the originally submitted design concept modified to,recognize the City Council's September 28,.1993 recommendations. This plan basically creates colored concrete path extensions to Beach Drive and 15th Court which divide the site into four landscaped areas. These landscaped areas will be dotted with mounded planting areas with meandering grass paths in between. Colored concrete seat and planter walls would complete the improvements. Alternative 2 represents a concept which has gathered input from the Public Works Maintenance Department and Police Department as well as from citizen and business persons. This plan attempts to create an "active" park in an effort to prevent the loitering and vagrancy associated with "passive" type parks. The activity of the park is designed - 2 - to center around a gathering area. Meandering paths will traverse the Park diagonally and will join at the gathering area. Four grassy knolls for viewing of the gathering center and the ocean front will be provided. Security lighting will be included at the request of the Police Department. Plantings would be limited to the installation of approximately ten shade trees with flower beds beneath these trees, giving the Park an open and friendly feeling. The southeast corner of the site proposes a tot lot with a nautical theme - perhaps a scaled down version of the sunken -ship Manhattan Beach has in their Polliwog Park. Staff believes that Alternative 2 represents the best combination of utility, safety and ease of maintenance. The cost to provide working drawings for either alternative will be in the neighborhood of $6,000. It will take approximately one month to complete these plans once approval of the conceptual plan is granted. Fiscal Impact: The hiring of a consultant to provide working drawings for the construction of Biltmore Park will require $6,000 of the $21,000 remaining in the Biltmore Park Project, CIP 92-501. The cost to design and construct the replacement of the 10" sewer main which runs through the Park is estimated to cost $60,000 of the $2,400,000 in the Sewer Project, CIP 92-408. Attachments Respectfully submitted, Amy Amir ni Director of Public Works Review for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/BILTPRK Concur: �6 �' Maey Dir ctor of Community Resources Stephen 0rkell City Manager - 3 - ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE Biltmore Park Project ALTERNATIVE I 1 L. S. $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200 Soil Preparation Mobilization 1 L.S. $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200 Irrigation 29,414 S.F. $ .55 $16,178 Landscaping 29,414 S.F. $ .55 $16,178 Sidewalk at 14th and 15th St. 330 S.F. $ 4.00 $ 1,320 C&G at 14th and 15th St. 60 L.F. $ 15.00 $ 900 Sidewalk 3200 S.F. $ 5.00 $16,000 Benches 50 L.F. $ 60.00 $ 3,000 Lighting 1 L.S. $ 20,000 $20,000 Subtotal $108,117 Contingencies at 10% $76,776 Contingencies at 10% TOTAL $ 7,678 TOTAL $84,453 ALTERNATIVE II Mobilization 1 L. S. $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200 Soil Preparation 320 C. Y. $ 15.00 $ 4,800 Irrigation 29,414 S.F. $ .55 $16,178 Landscaping 29,414 S.F. $ .65 $19,119 Sidewalk at 14th and 15th St. 330 S.F. $ 4.00 $ 1,320 C&G at 14th and 15th St. 60 L.F. $ 15.00 $ 900 Sidewalks 4,800 S.F. $ 5.00 $24,000 Benches 60 L.F. $ 60.00 $ 3,600 Tot Lot 1 L.S. $15,000.00 $15,000 Lighting 1 L.S. $20,000.00 $20,000 Subtotal $108,117 Contingencies at 10% $ 10,812 TOTAL $118,929 f:fk�� T �� C BILTMORE PARR SUMMARY I. INTENT OF ORDINANCE 92-1082 While there has been much discussion over the intent of the Ordinance the bottom line is really quite simple; to create an open space public park for all generations to use and enjoy. II. COASTAL COMMISSION APPROVED PLAN On May 13, 1993 the Coastal Commission granted the City of Hermosa Beach a permit to construct a public park on the Biltmore Site, per a conceptual plan submitted with the permit application. The conceptual plan included a gathering area, pathways, benches, trees, flower gardens and turf areas. According to the permit, "all development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal set forth in the Coastal Commission permit. Deviations from the approved plans must be reviewed by the Coastal Commission staff and may require Commission approval. III. SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE II Alternative II has taken the various approved elements of the Coastal Commission plan and has reoriented them on the site. This complies with the permit as it reads: "the final design may vary, but elements will not change." TOTAL AREA: 36,400 S.F. 36,400 S.F. Alternative II does, however, vary from the Coastal Commission plan in two ways: 1. The material for the pathways was specified as decomposed granite or wood chips in the Coastal Commission plan while alternative II suggests using colored, stamped concrete for ease of maintenance and accessibility. - 1 - COASTAL COMMISSION ALTERNATIVE ELEMENTS Plan II 1. Gathering Area 7,100 S.F. 5,100 S.F. 2. Pathways 3,500 S.F. 4,800 S.F. 3. Benches 375 L.F. 325 L.F. 4. Trees 19 10 5. Flower Beds 1,000 S.F. 1,900 S.F. 6. Turf/Grass 24,800 S.F. 22,200 S.F. 7. Tot Lot 0 2,400 S.F. TOTAL AREA: 36,400 S.F. 36,400 S.F. Alternative II does, however, vary from the Coastal Commission plan in two ways: 1. The material for the pathways was specified as decomposed granite or wood chips in the Coastal Commission plan while alternative II suggests using colored, stamped concrete for ease of maintenance and accessibility. - 1 - 2. The Coastal Commission plan did not entertain the notion of a tot lot. Because this element seems to fit the intent of the park and its intended appeal to all. age groups, Coastal Commission approval to add the tat lot should be quite academic. IV. OTHER DESIGNS Other designs submitted to the Public Works Department while beautiful in their own right are not in keeping with the intent of the Ordinance. These designs have proposed that the site be developed into botanical gardens. Gardens, while beautiful, limit the uses and enjoyment of the site to strolling and viewing of the gardens. The intent of a park with many uses for residents of all ages is not carried out. These designs also fail to implement the elements as defined in the coastal Commission plan. pworks/JM26 - 2 - NORTH Rr.iln- 111-rn' 1 5 T H S T R E E T b I HAND x C210 r0 cn 0 A3 Z 4T 0 z 1 4 T H S R E E T CONCEPTUAL PARK DESIGN ONLY FOR THE BILTIVIORE SITE NU I Lb: REMOVE ALL EXISTING CONCRETE. WATER CONSERATIVE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE PROVIDED TO ALL VEGETATIVE AREAS. ADD SOIL AS NECESSARY FOR PLANT GROWTH. FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY, BUT ELEMENTS WILL NOT CHANGE. 5- 93-,07' 10 w CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION PLAN JANUARY 25, 1994 BILTMORE PARK FUNDING: PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES TAX FUND $ 38,000 PHASE I - PHASE H - PHASE IH - PHASE IV - * Potential Funding ACTION ITEMS: DEMOLITION EXPENDITURE $ 17,000 SEWER FUND $ 60,000 HARDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, LIGHTING LA COUNTY TREE PLANTING GRANT $ 42,117* LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND $ 20,000 REMAINING FUND BALANCE FROM PHASE I $ 21,000 TREES AND FLOWERS CDF GRANT $ 25,000* Phase II - Infrastructure Improvements 1. Design Scheduled Item Task Completion Phase I - Demolition Date 1. Design / first phase - Demolition 10/21/93 2. Prepare Bid Package 10/27/93 3. Advertising - first 10/27/93 4. Advertising - second 11/3/93 5. Bid opening/review bids 11/18/93 6. City Council approval of bids and award of contract 12/14/93 7. Completed Demolition 1/6/94 Phase II - Infrastructure Improvements 1. Design 2/16/94 2. Prepare Bid Package 2/29/94 3. Advertising - first 3/3/94 4. Advertising - second 3/17/94 5. Bid opening/review bids 3/31/94 6. City Council approval of bids and award of contract 4/12/94 7. Construction 8. Complete construction and acceptance of project 6/12/94 Phase III - Pathways, grass, irrigation and lighting improvements 1. Prepare Request For Proposals 2. Consultant to prepare Proposals 3. Evaluate Proposals and hire a consultant 4. Design 5. Prepare Bid Package 6. Advertising - first 7. Advertising - second 8. Bid opening/review bids 9. City Council approval of bids and award of contract 10. Construction Phase IV - Trees and Flowers Planting 1. Prepare Request For Proposals 2. Consultant to prepare Proposals 3. Evaluate Proposals and hire a consultant 4. Design 5. Prepare Bid Package 6. Advertising - fust 7. Advertising - second 8. Bid opening/review bids 9. City Council approval of bids and award of contract 10. Construction Phase V - Tot Lot Improvements 1. Prepare Request For Proposals 2. Consultant to prepare Proposals 3. Evaluate Proposals and hire a consultant 4. Design 5. Prepare Bid Package 6. Advertising - first 7. Advertising - second 8. Bid opening/review bids 9. City Council approval of bids and award of contract 10. Construction ** When funding becomes available aa/biltmore. sch 2/7/94 2/24/94 2/25/94 4/4/94 4/7/94 4/7/94 4/21/94 5/17/94 5/24/94 6/30/94 2/7/94 2/24/94 2/25/94 4/4/94 4/7/94 2/7/94 2/24/94 2/25/94 4/4/94 4/7/94 : 11 _31 ,NMI -�� ___-_____-__-oma. _ � __------- _ _ __ ___ _---_-_---� -- ... . ........ 26- _........� _ _. --- - -------7/---'------�`� -. =__~-__~~,_~~,_~,________/________~______^_ ..._.....���_ .. . .... ......... / � -' - - -'-__----- 11 . . . . . . . . . . . MEOW To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the Council Date: January 25, 1994 Council Meeting From: ;, Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission Re: i'.. South School Park Master Plan In the interests of expediting the South School Master Plan process, listed below are the special concerns the Commission has with regards to the submitted plans. In general, the Commission concurs with staff recommendations and with the park concept as was submitted in May, 1993 but wishes to ensure the following: Revisit Master Plan with a design professional (Landscape Architect) Sidewalk cuts must be explicit as part of Phase I - include Valley Drive. Ensure maintenance be included in bids for hardscape/landscape. Stairway near Loma: Suggest ramp (ADA) Property encroachment issues and Body Glove property donation must be addressed. Ensure that park fence will stay in place during construction for security. Grading on project should be -1 vs. 15-1 at dune area and by Loma (ADA). Construction dust and dirt control must be monitored by engineer. Developing a graphic of Phase I for RFB. (Commission subcommittee will provide). Steven A. Crecy, Chairpers SUPPLEMENTAL O INFORMATION 0 j To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the Council Date: January 25, 1994 Council Meeting From: ;, Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission Re: i'.. South School Park Master Plan In the interests of expediting the South School Master Plan process, listed below are the special concerns the Commission has with regards to the submitted plans. In general, the Commission concurs with staff recommendations and with the park concept as was submitted in May, 1993 but wishes to ensure the following: Revisit Master Plan with a design professional (Landscape Architect) Sidewalk cuts must be explicit as part of Phase I - include Valley Drive. Ensure maintenance be included in bids for hardscape/landscape. Stairway near Loma: Suggest ramp (ADA) Property encroachment issues and Body Glove property donation must be addressed. Ensure that park fence will stay in place during construction for security. Grading on project should be -1 vs. 15-1 at dune area and by Loma (ADA). Construction dust and dirt control must be monitored by engineer. Developing a graphic of Phase I for RFB. (Commission subcommittee will provide). Steven A. Crecy, Chairpers SUPPLEMENTAL O INFORMATION 0 January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 SOUTH SCHOOL PARR CIP 92-501 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the following steps to initiate Phase I of the construction of South School Park: 1. Direct staff to prepare a Request For Proposal (RFP) to obtain architectural services to design South School Park per the conceptual plan previously submitted by the Parks Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. 2. Allocate $20,000.00 from the South School Park Project, CIP 92-501, to pay for architectural consultant services. Background: The City Council at their July 27, 1993 meeting adopted Resolution No. 93-5627 approving an application for the receipt of the City's per parcel allocation from the County of Los Angeles for the construction of South School Park. On December 2, 1993 the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District approved the allocation application for the amount of $219,729.00. The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission in their May 17, 1993 meeting approved a conceptual plan and phasing for the South School site. City Council at their July 27, 1993 meeting tentatively approved the construction of Phase I and Phase II of the conceptual plan but would not formally approve the plan and directed staff not to have park plans developed at that time. Attached you will find two previous agenda items (Attachment A & B) that describe the recommended conceptual plan from the Parks Recreation and Community Resources Commission and preliminary cost estimates. Analysis: Staff believes that it is essential to build the Park with the benefit of professional working drawings. In proceeding towards this direction the Public Works Department has prepared the demolition and grading plan. This plan uses the Commissions conceptual plan as a basis and represents a first step towards the development of the Park without locking ourselves into the conceptual plan per se. At this time staff would like to prepare an RFP to obtain landscape architectural services to design the Park using the Commission's conceptual plan and the City prepared demolition/grading plans as a basis for their design. The projected cost for these services would be approximately $20,000.00. City Council in its July 27, 1993 meeting tentatively approved construction of Phase I of the conceptual South School Park design with the addition of turf installation. The Public Works staff has analyzed the phasing of the South School project and has come up with a modified Phase I plan which falls within the current budget and grant constraints. This Phase I would include total removal of the existing driveways and parking areas, minor refurbishment to the existing school structure, soil import and grading, installation of an irrigation system to serve the entire park, construction of 10' wide colored concrete walkways surrounding and giving access to the park, installation of walkway lighting for park security, construction of an asphalt parking area with access from Cypress Avenue, hydroseeding of the turf areas and the planting of additional trees. The estimated cost for this work is $308,375.00 (See attached preliminary estimate). Phase II would then provide the interior remodel of the existing structure, construction of the tot lot, construction of tennis courts, construction of basketball courts, construction of an access road to the park structure, construction of the entry plaza and handicapped access ramps, installation of additional security lighting and planting of additional landscaping. The cost for Phase II would be approximately $350,000.00. Areas of improvement in phase II would be developed into temporary sand volleyball courts until phase II monies become available. As outlined in previous Council items (see attachments A & B) the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission has recommended that total park construction be favored over phased development. Cost savings of 5 to 10% over a two-phase construction sequence are expected. Additionally, a fully developed and active park provides the neighborhood with a more immediate benefit while deterring nuisance loitering and vandalism. Funding: The current budget constraints -leave the City approximately $350,000 short of the mark for.total park construction. To meet this shortfall staff is exploring potential grant sources (i.e., Department of Forestry Tree Planting Grant). In the interest of expediting the project, however, it may be prudent for Council to consider loaning funds from the 6% WT Fund to the Parks and Recreation Facility Tax Fund. A payment schedule could then -be set up where the 6% WT Fund would be paid back as grant monies are received and as the Park and Recreation Fund appreciates. - 2 - LN Fiscal Impact: The hiring of a consultant to provide working drawings for the construction of South School Park will require an estimated $20,000.00 of the $329,729.00 in the South School Park Project, CIP 92-501, leaving $309,729.00 to be put towards Park improvements and construction management services. If complete construction of South School Park is preferred, an appropriation from the WT or Conservancy Fund should be explored after midyear budget review. Attachments Respectfully submitted, Amy Amirani Director of Public Works Review for Fiscal Impact: /, • ' i-10"AZ44-4-� Viki Co eland Finance Director pworks/SOSCHPK Concur: Z92 - Ma ney Di ector of Community Resources Stephe irell City Man ger - 3 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOUTH SCHOOL PARK - PHASE I PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 1 Removals L.S. - $17,000 2 Refurbish existing structure L.S. $15,000 3 Soil preparation _(add 4" topsoil) 15,060 S.Y. $ 1.50/S.Y. $22,000 4 Import soil for berms (Fine grade) 2,500 C.Y. $ 8.00/C.Y. $20,000 5 Install irrigation system 135,000 S.F. $ .65/S.F. $87,750 6 Install area lighting 25 $1,500/EA. $37,500 7 Construct P.C.C. walk 10, wide 22,625 S.F. $ 3.00/S.F. $67,875 8 Construct concrete stairway w/handrail 75 L.F. $50.00/L.F. $ 3,750 9 Concrete curb 380 L.F. $10.00/L.F. $ 3,800 10 Construct A.C. parking 7,800 S.F. $ 2.00/S.F. $15,600 lot w/striping 11 Hydroseed lawn areas 13,000 S.Y. $ 1.00/S.Y. $13,000 12 Plant 241, box trees (eucaTpptus, coral, pine) 17 $ 300/EA. $ 5,100 GRAND TOTAL $308,35 PWORKS/SSPKCHRT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION PLAN NOVEMBER 2, 1993 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CIP 92-515 FUNDING: PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES TAX FUND GRANT: ACTION ITEMS: $100,000 $219,000 Scheduled - ItemCompletion Task Date Bid Process 1. Design / first phase -demolition and grading 1/28/94 2. Design approval by Parks and Recreation Commission 2/16/94 3. Design approval by City Council 2/22/94 4. Prepare Bid Package 2/29/94 5. Advertising - first 2/29/94 6. Advertising - second 3/01/94 7. Bid opening/review bids 3/28/93 8. City Council approval of bids and award of contract 4/12/94 Construction 1. Pre construction meeting 4/19/94 2. Start construction 4/20/94 3. Grading 5/18/94 4. Irrigation 6/17/94 5• Hardscape construction - 7/20/94 6• Complete construction and acceptance by CC 7/26/94 aa/sspark.sch Attachment "A" May 2s, 1993 Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council lane 3, 1993 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: COST ESTIMATES dl; PRIORITIZATION Recommendation It is recommended by the Paries, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council - Approve dee concepaial p4m for the par* as Presented at the April 13, 1993 ,5feedrg Dema szaffto prqmm a squat fa biA foe an. wrckdecutnal jean to provide designs and working wags for tke p&* Adopt the CzwLqdssjmS plmrfor prioridzad R of par* devrla mmL Receiw mrd films tote cost esti r far pw* c=3VKcdM Backvmu" The Commission's recommended conceptual plan for the South School Park -was presented to Council the Apel 13, 1993 Meeting. At that time, Council directed staff to obtain cost estimates for park development and requested that the Comm=on prioritize park development in Ught of a potential phased construction. The Cosunission approved the recommendations above and schedule for phased development as presented m the analysis below at their May 17 1993 meeting. Aaal"is Keeping mindful of the fact that a phased development wffl likely add to the cost of park construction in the short and long run, the Comm=on approached ph ing from a logical lark construction standpoint. That is, all of the site preparation work would be done at the same time wtuch would not only be efficient but would also be cost effective as prices for materials is reduces as volume increases. Listed below are the four (4) phases recommended by the Comm FRET -Il► NARY FHASZ: MASTER PLAN This phase would be initiated with the obvious first step of obtaining arrhritec=al services to provide the City with a master plan and working drawings for thelam- This 1l --- an page would serve as the fiameworic,through which the City will be able to secure bids for either total or a phased park development. Using an 8% of project cost figure to estimate the cost of architectur d services, the City could expect to pay from 540-60 thousand for the preparatory phase. PHASE 1: SITE PREPARATION' Respite the fact that the most desirable park elements would not be included in the first phase, there is an obvious logical progression to construction that dictates the initial phase. Included would be: Site demolition and prep work; grading; drainage; preliminary electrical work and irrigation. Though it represents a substantial cost, this phase would nut result in any visible park improvements. Cost estimates are as follows: Sazaki: $201,545 Ammon: 5293,750 Moss: S 65,000 PHASE Q: LANDSCAPING / PAVING/SECURITY LIGHTING The committee elected to "put the green" in the park next. Due to the fact that the completion of this phase would render the park usable (though totally passive), the committee thought it would be cmcal to combine the landscaping efforts with paving to accommodate pedestrian and vehicular access. It would be equally important to provide security lighting and fencing at this time as appropriate to ensure park safety compatibd ty with the neighborhood. Cost estimates are as follows: Sazaki: $403,616 American: S365,2_50 Moss: 5186,620 PHASE IH: FURNISHINGS AND RECREATION FACILITIES This final phase would put the activities in the park to include: picnic areas, plaza seating, tot lot, basketball/volleyball court, teams courts and restrooms. Once the park is defined by the landscaping and paved areas, the recreation Facilities can be phased increaentaffy and/or there may be areas for interim facilities (i.e., put a low cost sand volleyball court in the proposed hard caul ares for the combination court). The committee did not prioritize individual recreation facilities as it was thought that (depending on when this phase is initiated), community input could determine the top priority facilities. Cost estimates are as follows: Sazaici: American: Moss: 5140,659" S143,500 5223,400 page' "added S50,000 for restrooms not included in bid. ESTIMATES Attached you will find three (3) preliminary estimates for park construction: one from Brian Mitchell of Sasaki & Associates; one from American Landscape, Inc; and one from Lawrence Moss & Associates. Staff requested estimates from several other firms, however, it was difficult to gain timely responses from them as their priorities were with official bids and paid projects. Clearly, the range of estimates and the differences by phase pose some difficuhies in obtaining a meaningful average. The median cost by phase for park development would total approximately S784,000 while the mean would be S724,377. Obviously, the best estimate the City will obtain will be through the competitive bid Process. The completion of the Preliminary Phase will provide the City with the framework for the construction bid process. CONCLUSIONS The Commission stiIl fieels strongly that total park construction would be favored over a phased development both from a cost standpoint and in order to provide the residents with the use of the park as soon as possible. Recognizing the limitations of the Paris and Recreation Facility Tax Fund, an exploration of alternative funding sources wiII be critical to meeting this objective. With the S 100,000 currently budgeted in CEP #92.315 and the anticipated $240,000 from Proposition A, the City may not be able to exceed Phase I in the near future (which means that there would be no usable park space). Absent emerging State grant sources, a loan from the general fund (i.e., UUI' surplus) to the Park and Recreation Tax Fund would be the only viable avenue for total park development at this time. Attachments: Preliminary estimate: Sasaki & Associates Preliminary estimate: American Landscape, Inc. Preliminary estimate: Lawrence Moss & Associates Conceptual Ptan: South School Site Respectfnay Submitted, w • 1 Y:.� page3 Concur. Frederick R FerM' City Manager - SASAKI ASSOCIATES, INC. 2036 Armacost Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 820-4882 (310) 820-4669 Fax STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST SOUTH PARK May 3, 1993 Page 1 of 3 IA. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL COSTS PROJECT NO. 30707.00 rM M. UNIT COST SUBTOTAL DIVISION 1 MOBILIZATION/GENERAL Allow Allow 35,050.00 CONDITIONS DIVISION 2 02550 Site Demolition L Chain link fence 2. Chain link fence and reset 3. A.C. paving 02110 Clearing I. Dozer and brush rake 02210 Grading I. Import and spread 025100 Paving & Surfacing I. A.C. 3' thk. 2. Concrete 11.60 a. walk SF b. basket ball w/equip. 3.5 C. tennis court w/fence 1,675.00 d. picnic -pad 3. Curb - 6' 4. Surface in tot lot 02580 Pavement Marking 1. 2' wide 02650 Water System 1. 4" PVC. 2. Drink Fountain 520 LF 1.90 330 LF 11.60 40,970 SF 1.20 3.5 A 1,675.00 1,390 CY 13.50 16,857 SF 1.15 39,970 SF 4.00 4,200 SF Allow 13,200 SF Allow 5 EA 500.00 1,260 SF 5.50 1,090 SF 8.00 25 stall 1.60 160 LF 6.90 1 EA 1,250.00 988.00 3,828.00 1Q $53,980.00 5.867.00 $5,862.00 18.684.00 S 18,684.00 19,385.00 159,880.00 15,100.00 35,000.00 2,500.00 6,930.00 8.7^0.00 S 247,515.00 1,104.00 1,250.00 $2,354.00 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COSI' SOUTH PARK May 3, 1993 Page 2 of 3 IA. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL COSTS 027100 Sub -drainage 1. 6" drain 2. C.B. 02810 Irrigation 1. Turf 2. Ground -cover 3. Backflow 4. Point of Connection 02860 Play Equipment 1. Tot Equipment 2. Bike Rack 02870 Site Furnishings I. Shade structure 2. Picnic tables 3. Benches 4. Trash enclosure 5. Bollard 02910 Lzndscaping I. Soil Prep. 2. Fine grading 3. Weed control (pre -emerge) 4. Shrub (1 gallon) 5. Groundcover 6. Turf - (hydroseed) 7. Tree a. 15 gallon b. 24' box c. 36' box 8. 90 Day Maintenance DIVISION 3 I. Tot -lot Seat Wall 2. Hdcp. Ramp walls 3. Stairs 600 LF 4.50 Allow 7 EA 1,000.00 99,967 SF .65 44,702 Sl~ 1.10 1 EA 2,650.00 1 EA 345.00 Allow 4,000.00 Allow 1,000.00 4 EA 6,000.00 9 EA 1.500.00 7 EA 800.00 5 EA 400.00 5 EA 400.00 144,669 SF 144,669 SF 144,669 SF 920 EA 44,702 SF 99,967 SF 105 EA 25 EA 17 EA 144,669 SF .12 .10 .02 4.15 .15 .05 PROJECT NO. 30707.00 IWAff,51 11 1.1,11'1 11 11 64,978.00 49,172.00 2,650.00 345.00 S 117,145.00 $47,100.00 17,360.00 14,467.00 2,893.00 3,813.00 6,705.00 4,998.00 6,825.00 5,375.00 10,200.00 13.020.00 S85,661.00 80 LF 35.00 2,800.00 230 LF 75.00 17,250.00 822 SF 12.00 9.864.00 S 29,914.00 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST SOUTH PARK May 3, 1993 Page 3 of 3 IA. L. dNDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL COSTS PROJECT NO. 30707.00 L7EM� UNIT COST SUBTOTAL DIVISION 5 1. Metal handrail 275 LF 25.00 6.875.00 $ 6,875.00 DIVISION 6 1. 2 X 4 header brd. DIVISION 16 I. Point of Connection 2. Walkway light 3. Ramp light niche 4. Telephone 60 LF 3.00 1,$000 1,800.00 Allow 2,500.00 2,500.00 45 EA 1,500.00 67,500.00 20 EA 270.00 5,400.00 NIC NIC n S 75,400.00 SUBTOTAL: 5736,080.00 Contingency 10% $73,608.00 COST TOTAL: $809,688.00 Based on Preliminary Site Plan (dated 1/12193) by Paris, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. Summary: $163,344.00/Acte S 3.68/S.F. AMERICA LANDS May 25, 1993 Ms. Mary C. Rooney, Director Community Resources Department City of Hermosa Beech 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Re: South School Park Site, Hermosa Beach Budget Proposal for Site Development Dear Ms. Rooney: CAPE, INC. rQPS Via FAX/Mail We are pleased to submit for your consideration the following preliminary cost estimate for the site development of the above referenced project. We propose to furnish all labor, materials, equipment and services necessary to perform all site development in strict accordance to the plans and specifications prepared by Sasaki Assoc_, plans numbered 1 and 2, plans dated January 12, 1993. All the above work shall be completed in a professional and workmanlike manner, according to standard practices. Our cost breakdown is as follows: Item SEE ATTACHED Amount The attached preliminary cost estimate is based on the project being completed by December 31, 1995. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and we are looking forward to working with you on the successful completion of this project. If you have may questions, or need further information, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, AME$ICAN LANDSCAPE, E, INC.. Sal Berumen Marketing Manager D 7949 DEERING AVENUE, CANOGA PARK, CALIFORNIA 91304 • (818) 999-2041 • FAX (818) 999-2056 SOUTH SCHCCL PARK SITE { PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE t NEW REZ' n'CCU aLM ► SITE PREM. WC;;K NIC ACUGi-t GP.AOING ALLOW So, 000 � S17E DR AINAGE i ALLOW i 50,000 ......_.. SITE LIGHTING 45 @ 2,500 I ALLOW 25,000 _ A.C. PAVING $ PARXING LOT STA PING 17,000 @ 1. 50, + 25 @ 10028,000 112 , 500 CGvC1;E'E C U A G U%G;K 1250 @ 12 CONCnEi'c PAVING (WALKWAYS. SASKETSALL CODA , 3 •3 15 , 800 UTIUTiES (0CMESiIC WATER. FIRE HYOAATE) AtLOu > 0•1 000. IRF;IGATICN WCAK 145,000 @ .75 t 108,750 SIGVAGc _.. LNv0SC.APE WCAK -145,000 ALLC-M, 2,500 . @ .50 • TOT LOT EGUIPMENT -• 72•,'500� SAZKF BALL COURT EcuipmeiT ALLOW L0, 000 _ 2 @ 750 CCUAT WCSK 13 000 @ 4.00 1, sao , ITE FUSNISHING,S - (. 52,000 LOCAYINAINTENANCE PEF; J00 ALLOW 30,000 145,000 @ .05 I 2,250 CBILItA?iC�1 General Cond . -25,000 CONTINGENCY lo: 73,475 TOTAL. 1 5808,225 MAY- 7-93 FP, I 13 : 32 c i t y f her uo= ab h P. y i SOUTH SCHOOL PARK SITE PRELIMINARY CCST ESTIMATE j LAWRENCE R. MOSS d ASSCC. _ 3458 CCEANVIEW BLVD. GLENDALE, CA 91208 818) 248-5200 APRIL 20,1993 I I NEW R:a, RCCM 2LDG. S;TE PRE?, WORK 100.000.00 RCUCH- GRACING 4,000.00 SITE CAAINAGE "— 11.000.00 SITE LIGHTING 3,500.00 _ A.C. PAVING & PARKING :JT S7RiPING I 12.000.00 CCNCA c CURS JA C, .__ 12.800.00 CCNCRETc PAVING (WALKWAYS, @ASKETHALL COIR 12,100.00 67,120,00 UTILITIES DaMESTiC WATER, FIRE HYCAATE) IRRIGATION WORK 6 500.00 I 40,000.00 SIGNAGE I 4,200.00 LANDSCAPE WCFK 565,000.00 TOT LOT ECUIPMENT I 25,000.00 EASKI:I BALL COURT ECU _ 8.400.00 TENNIS CCURT WCRK 53.000.00 MISC. SITE FURNISHINGS (3 CAY !ViAJ TEN,gNCc PERIOp --' 351000.00 PROFIT, MCSILIZATICN & OVERHEAD 5,000.00 38,000.00 i I T07AL I S50S,220.00 tMJ 9Ltc ,(yytnrtr-17y,1 1 � � 1111 rn, nl n0/ ,I�tAr, tM,V11 A r.M.n O• �' ' 1 . , //•rnl )Ina♦rf0101 11 to or A ...• / • V 311 V SOW II 311 J0 A 1 I17 .L.n_...a s•. ao•a�r.vo,r .. rW ' .'.+.... t' • �Iltdl IVM r1rM ` r, _oiled AVIS ISTWO "Ido _ 11 / •4Fv • .eta t i � 0' Id Y1Ml•� 1 � l .. '—.•.� 1 � IYIg7 /N,11 ,t �III,OI �:� �. �� � , h I l • ,. • �. t .I (j, lUr�•tl Orllrrr. •• " '� I �ftVv] all 101 prrrrr. 1 1}/ R I -• _.. / • - ' `• vi DAIApo 91" LAI A 7 • 1 �� D � I M O N � ' A J !l ►..a1••r c•...a....�...• fin.•• r.Ati .v�tw .- wT. �••••• ..• tw�r> �.r ..r 1. �....,...r Is..•..• ...nT _...-- !tC110N A �UMON A CGN10 r r ft' • 1Tt�.a / .Wr—.+ �w.t1► t+rvv• t – • /nwwlh� Iii fin•.. r•+../nw.•rw.. war •w• tN\wM ,'�—�C�'���� _ __ _ F[C110N t: tl[1�4M C •,hhr•i vC-hC�TiOfV /v.+4 CL,:N.•. �) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TOPINGSCM4NIC AU4AA9 slog I n lE��i o.(7..��� I N.a w.�r•Ir' n•.w rr.. W�1 r.u1 NV�✓.� r....ar K -__ _ _ —W7f Attachment "B" onto her property and caused damage; asked that this not be allowed to happen again. The public hearing was closed at 8:51 P.M. Action: to refer the requested exception back to the Planning Commission to reconsider the facts of the case and its consistency with the language of Section 601, and have findings on the record of why it is applicable to the Ordinance. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Essertier and Mayor Wiemans. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: COST ESTIMATES AND PRIORITIZATION. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. , Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Peter Manaurian - 1100 The Strand, said he considered the cost too high; Steve Crecy - 1142 Second Street, Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, said the residents should have a well planned park since they had paid in excess of two mil- lion dollars for the land; said the City should meet the legal standards required for labor costs and handicapped access; Cathy McCurdy - 1113 Valley Drive, suggested the City approve the master plan drawings in order to get realistic bids rather than estimates; J.R. Reviczkv - 600 Ardmore, Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, said any park needed a good design since it was planned for 50 or 60 years of use; said it would save money in the long run to get a good foundation; and, Brian Mitchell - Saki and Associates, volunteered the preliminary drawings, suggested getting a budget first, then doing what was possible. Councilmember Midstokke thanked Mr. Mitchell for his drawings of the park. (Benz returned to the dais at 7:55 P.M.) Proposed Action: To approve the p-1 Community Rec~eat' Community to: _ %s , -%-j" and Resources Advisory Commission recommendation 1) approve the conceptual plan for the park as pres- ented at the April 13, 1993 City Council meeting; City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Paqe 3 2) direct staff to prepare a request for bids for an architectural firm to provide designs and working drawings for the park; 3) adopt the Commission's prioritization of the park development; and, 4) receive and file the cost estimates for park construction. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion died due to the withdrawal of the second. Promosed Action: To use current resources to get a park going with just grass and sprinklers. Motion Essertier. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To prepare plans plus the lawn in phase II. Motion Essertier, second noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton. for phase I: site preparation, Benz. The motion carried, of Midstokke and the absence At 8:08 the order of the agenda was returned to the Public Hear- ings starting at item no. 5. 9. APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR GREENBELT LANDSCAPING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated June 3, 1993. Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port, explained renderings, and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, said he was allergic to eucalyptus; questioned if something else could be used. Action: To approve the staff recommendation -to direct staff to request bids for the proposed landscaping of the Greenbelt for: 1) purchase of irrigation equipment; 2) purchase of trees; and, 3) installation of trees, • with the exclusion of the intersection area at Pier Avenue, as the R/UDAT study committee might like to make suggestions that would tie that area into the downtown entryway. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. Final Action: To refer the question of trimming, thin- ning or removing any of the oleanders on the Valley Drive side of the Greenbelt (in—front of City Hall) to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission for its recommendation. City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 9 H motion: "To direct staff to do whatever is immediately necessary to make repairs to the basketball surface so it is at least safe to play on." i•1cCurdy/Crecy All Ayes Improvements at Clark Field: The Commission recommends that this project goes out to bid to evaluate possible costs. Note: Add "Roller Hockey Project" to the B list Note: Add "Sizematic upgrade to the Clark Building" to the A list. Note: Edith Rodaway basketball courts should be placed on the A list. Council Action re: Biltmore Park Parker Herriott - resident Feels Commission should be involved in master plan of Biltmore Park in order to give direction. ,SOUTH SCHOOL PARK MASTER :PLA11".1 Motion: "Develop a plan and engineer drawings to do the eastern portion of the park which is in the conceptual design as all the grassy areas; to designate as future areas, the area behind the existing building and all the hard court surfaces; to implement Phase I which will be to put in all the underground that's required for Phase I stubbing into those future areas and designing and engineering those things at a later date but at least having a utility stub there; to landscape the eastern portion of the park." Reviczky/Blaco All Ayes Staff Report Election of Interim Chairperson: Steve Crecy AVP Tournament: Trophy Presentation - Staff will recommend to City Council ADJOURNMENT: 9:50 p.m. - P - Parks Commission Minutes June 14, 1993 ' _ ... W OC W .. O, Q r I I o W 1 R 0. C(�`�• n•rn ,c Auv ` I oII AS S. PL AY•AnEA /1 r• A!9��� t //� {�r'+rtL• I 4111 1 ►ARI(MO IGr Iii CA1114� ., AnnnIC117 .. .r(;% , -•�. _ i� [art. �'1� It.nas cottll � 1 t— — �• ,. -.•••• _ _� ♦ •IYAUt r.�T'tttl DRiff I' t f WA I WAY J. G♦[N GRASS ►LAS I1t10 ♦ - Lf IA .-.% WALKMAY,LIGM[t ♦ •••• (t ..._ _ •• ..... ...�..... 1 f / 1`,+ / . �• l_ r , I .. :: ..10 r-•...; ?.-A R MAY I'• . /'�` • y �'Y / •� �"L. �.. N[c-e�tipN n..o cc....ylnr •rr _1 ! I ,-`/ !/i,^^ f_• �C _ 'lI� �1 �rne.�c•• r.o.n a..v co...,cam/ — I 1 1 \ • \ ` 1 _ — t�. `T/ ' on[[Nn[Lr ACCESS CITY or HEriMOSA HCA( ♦ 111 •Stalcr I. .Ir .. r. ... » . ...�.... ♦• _ .q f�� -- • • - or •. •• '♦ np .SMJ K ICr06pArn IC Sunv[r • A _'.I • IOu.O•I, Or ►VILIC 0.0,[-11 SOV III SC -=J. ►Ant S I t[ ' •��G �—T•f•GLILIit V.PY .:I"SC (•ll.t! February 5, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council Regular Meeting of April 13, 1993 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission that Council approve a conceptual plan for the South School site that would provide for a low impact neighborhood park containing approximately 70°'o passive green space; two (2) tennis courts; a combination volleybalUbasketball court; a tot lot; picnic facilities; parking for 25 cars and pedestrian pathways. It is further recommended that Council direct staff to take the following specific actions to facilitate the Master Plan development of the site: 1) Submit the conceptual plan to the Coastal Commission for approval. 2) Prepare a request for bids for an architectural firm to provide designs and working drawings for the park. BACKGROUND The City purchased the 4.51 acre property from the School District in Januar-,!. 1992 at a cost of S2.34 million to the Park and Recreation Facility Tax Fund. Since that time_ the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission has been studving the site and taking public testimony from residents in order to formulate_ the beginnings of what will ultimately be a Master Plan for the park. As the topic has been on the Parks and Recreation agenda for some time. _ Council Members have been supplied with "South School Notebooks" that contain all of the previous agenda items about the park and action minutes Page 1 from relevant meetings. Notebooks are available for public review in the City Clerk's Office and at the Community Center. At their October 29, 1992 meeting, the Commission approved a conceptual plan for the park that is described in the analysis below and illustrated in Attachment A. As the City is still in the conceptual phase of Master Planning, the designs are created to highlight the Commission's recommendations for the park and are not intended as blueprints for park development. These designs were donated by a resident who lives adjacent to the park. The Planning Commission reviewed the conceptual plan at their February 16, 1993 meeting. They expressed approval for the conceptual plan and indicated that while they would like to maximize the green space in the park to the greatest extent possible, they did have some concerns that the 25 parking spaces indicated in the plan may be deficient. Individual comments from Commissioners are summarized in the minutes from their meeting (Attachment G). ANALYSIS: Public input In studying the South School site, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission obtained public input from a number of areas. First, as the Planning Commission is aware, there is a Park and Recreation Master Plan referenced in the open space element of the City's General Plan. Designed to guide the orderly development of park and recreation facilities (and programs) through the year 2010, this plan was adopted by Council in February, 1990. The City formed a resident committee of 27 people who provided input to the document. The specific recommendations from the Parks and Recreation Master plan regarding South School are contained in Attachment B. The Parks and Recreation Commission held two (2) formal hearings on the subject, one in which residents in a 300' radius were noticed via the mail. In addition to the advertised hearings, aspects of the plan were placed on the regular agenda several times throughout the year. Page 2 Additional public input was solicited with a survey that appeared in the City's recreation brochure (mailed to every resident) and was distributed at various Parks and Recreation meetings and events. The responses to the survey are contained in a notebook at the City Clerk's Office and are summarized in the agenda item dated August 6, 1992 (in the South School Notebook). The Basic Concept: A neighborhood multi -use park Recognizing the City's dual need for recreation activities and passive open space, the Commission elected to stay with the general recommendations from the Master Plan that call for a neighborhood park containing a mixture of uses that could serve active recreational needs while fulfilling.the desire the community has for the aesthetics and enhanced open space areas. There are a number of reasons that the Commission arrived at this decision. First, the City's park inventory contains two significant totally passive parks in the 50 acre beach and the 19 acre Greenbelt. The 7 acre Clark Field and the surrounding complex exists as the City's intensive use sports facility. The 5.33 acre Valley Park provides a multi -use neighborhood at the north end and the remaining 11 parkettes offer a mixture of uses from tot lots to basketball courts to picnic areas. It is projected that the prospective development of the South School site as a multi -use park would provide a south end anchor for the City, providing a flavor similar to though not identical to Valley Park on the North. With an emphasis towards encouraging maximum residential pedestrian access (thereby reducing parking requirements), the concept is inclusive of pedestrian walkways and entrances at every corner of the park. The Greenbelt is viewed to provide a link between the City's largest parks (Clark Field, Valley Park and South School) and offers the City a unique ability to create a continuous landscaped buffer at the entryway to the beach area. The Commission also attempted to select recreation facilities that would not create excessive demands for parking. The 25 spaces indicated in the conceptual plan are comparably less than the 77 at Valley Park (does not include the 19 available on Valley Drive) and the 46 (plus 74 on the adjacent Greenbelt) at Clark Field. A chart noting the various elements of the park concept by percentage of land use is included in Attachment C. Page 3 The Conceptual Plan: Elements (A) Open Space areas: The open space areas include a large open grass field, landscaped buffers at the perimeter of the park and picnic areas. Body Glove has made a verbal offer to the City to donate the area at the northeast corner of the park (on Valley Drive) to the City which would provide a substantial buffer for the proposed 22 car parking lot on the same corner. Grading would be done to provide interesting berms and contours to the flat areas of the park in order to enhance the aesthetics. (B) Recreation Facilities: Tot Lot: Playground equipment (occupying approximately 1,000 square feet) which would be protected from the rest of the park by some kind of barrier (safety). Some consideration may be given to equipment for older children if the building may be used for recreation programs (i.e., afterschool activities). Tennis Courts (2): Selected as popular/low impact facilities, these courts would be buffered from the parking lot area by a picnic/spectator/seating area that would be conducive to more sedentary activities and/or would provide an area for tennis players to wait for courts and socialize after matches: The City currently has eight well -utilized courts (Community Center and Clark Field). Combination Volleyball/Basketball Court: Designed to accommodate the picnic users who generally run the gamut of activities in a day. In combination with the open grass field, the Commission felt that this facility would provide a balance of offerings to park visitors. Open Grass Play Field: Instead of providing a field specific to one sport or another, the field was designed to accommodate casual and picnic uses as well as practice areas for youth teams in a variety of sports. This was not projected to be a location for league games (a higher intensity use); thus there is no night lighting (as there is at Clark Field) and no bleachers or skinned fields. Building: After exhaustive review, the Commission felt it would be prudent to wait until a pressing need for additional building space evolves (optimally one that would be revenue generating so as not place an undue burden on the Page 4 maintenance budget) before too much effort is placed in renovation. The Community Center meets the majority of the City's meeting room and lease needs at this time, however, the City does not currently have any parks in operation that have a building on site for exclusive recreation use (i.e., a space for equipment for youth programs). It is projected that once additional needs are identified that could assist the City in meeting the operational costs of opening the building, the City could retain one (1) of the four (4) classrooms as a youth recreation center. It is noteworthy that the Commission did suggest that the restrooms located in the building be renovated for general park use instead of constructing a new building in the park. They did add, however, that if refurbishing the existing . restrooms did not result in a substantial cost savings over building new ones, they would favor a separate building. Lighting: The Commission is recommending that the park not be lighted for night use, however, security lighting will be an obvious necessity. There has been some discussion about the possibility of lighting the tennis courts (as they are not in a residentially sensitive area). Municipal Swimming Pool: The possibility of building a municipal swimming pool at the South School site was that topic of some discussion during the Parks and Recreation Master Plan study. The residents who participated in the study were split on this issue so it remained a possibility though not a definitive recommendation. Due to the substantial operating costs associated with a municipal swimming pool, the Parks and Recreation Commission was concerned that the City's general fund would not support these costs on an annual basis. The Commission was not entirely opposed to a pool but decided not to include one in the initial plan. Instead they would like to design the park with space that could ultimately be used as a pool site should the City's financial picture improve in the future. An agenda item dated May 21, 1992 is contained in the South School Notebook which outlines some of the potential costs associated with a municipal swimming pool. Clearly, the addition of a pool would change the flavor of the park from a low intensity to a higher intensity recreational use. If a facility is built, some strong consideration to expanding the parking for the site should be given. Page (C) Ingress/Egress & Parking: Pedestrian access: Would be provided from Valley Drive (no fences) on the entire east side of the park; 4th Street and Culper Court on the southwest side; and Loma Drive and Sunset on the northwest side of the park. Due to ADA requirements and the desire to accommodate persons of all physical abilities in the park, attention has been given not only to providing handicap access at the entrances to the park, but also by providing pathways throughout the park. Recreation facilities and playground equipment will reflect a similar attention to the needs of the disabled community. It is important to note that the Commission is inclined to request that the City retain the 10' right-of-ways at the westernmost portion of the park (see Attachment F) to provide additional pedestrian accessways. Some of the neighbors (who have put substantial effort into caring for these areas) have requested that the City vacate the property, however, the Commission feels that the land is too critical to overall park development to lose. A link with the Greenbelt would be established via a crosswalk and/or bridge crossing to enhance the pedestrian friendliness of the park. Vehicular access: The Commission proposes to keep the main vehicular access on Cypress Avenue in order to provide a safe and slower entry to the park (than may be provided with a Valley Drive entrance) and to allow space for a landscape buffer on the street side to enhance Valley Drive aesthetics. Clearly, due to the industrial nature of Cypress Avenue, creating a beautiful entryway to the park will be a challenges however, it may prove to be beneficial both to the park and to the surrounding streets. The Commission was challenged with the location of the existing building (at the westernmost end of the park) with regards to vehicular access. They examined the possibility of providing vehicular access from Loma Drive, but the majority of the Cominissioners felt that an access road along the park's north side could be buffered to reduce its intrusion on the open space and would provide for City maintenance needs and firture short term and handicap access parking for the upper section of the park. Due to the Commission's - decision to "moth ball" the building for now, the roadway would fall low on the list of prioritized park development. Page 6 Parking: As indicated above, the conceptual plan calls for minimal parking_ It is difficult to find meaningful standards for parking in City parks (per acre or by facility), however, in comparison with most surrounding City parks, the 25 spaces indicated would fall on the low end (see Attachment D). Staff has some concerns that while an attempt has been made to create a concept that would dictate a low impact park, that the demand for additional parking may be an inevitability. FUNDING: NEXT STEPS The acquisition of the property exhausted the majority of the City's Park and Recreation Facility Tax Fund. This' fund appreciates at the rate of approximately $60-100 thousand per year. The preliminary estimates from the Park and Recreation Master Plan projected the costs to develop the site at $500 thousand . In today's dollars, it is estimated that the park will cost approximately $600-700 thousand to build. For Fiscal Year 1992-93, the Council has appropriated $100 thousand to the South School project. Additional immediate potential sources of funding include $250 thousand from Proposition A and general fund monies'from the PERS refund or reserves that could be utilized to accelerate park development and then reimbursed from the Parks and Recreation Tax Fund over the next few years. Careful review of the potential annual general fund commitment to operate the park (i.e., maintenance) on an annual basis is an obvious concern as well with preliminary estimates of up to $60 thousand per year including contracts, utilities, supplies and labor. It is obvious that absent a loan from the general fund, the park may be developed in phases. Despite that fact, it is critical for the City to create a Park Master Plan so that there is a rhyme to the reason of phased developpent and so that while there will be an immediate benefit to the community with the development of specific park elements, the overall plan will be realized in future years. Once the Council approves a conceptual plan for the park, the next step will be to develop a final design (and theme) for the park concurrently with establishing the priorities for development (dictated in part by the most — Page 7 immediate renovation needs and by what the most desirable elements in the park are deters ined to be). As this plan will ultimately provide a park that will be used for generations to come, Council and resident input at this early phase in Master Plan development will be beneficial in assisting the City to build the best park possible for the community. The Commission and staff look forward to bringing this exciting project to fruition so that the benefits associated with this important acquisition may be realized in the near future. Fiscal Impact: None at this time. Currently there is $100 thousand budgeted in the Parks CIP Account for South School Park development. Staff will return to Council with cost estimates and an RFB for park design if the conceptual plan is approved. Respectfully submitted, Mary C. Rooney C*fi4trrilty Resources Director Attachments: Attachment A: Attachment B: Attachment C: Attachment D: Attachment E: Attachment F. - Attachment G: Concur: Frederick R. Fenin City Manager Conceptual Plan for South School Suggestions from the Park and Recreation Master Plan Pie chart -showing use of land by percentage List of parking space allotments various parks Open Space Zone Ordinance Memorandum from Public Works: Public Easements Planning Commission Minutes: 2 16,'93 ATTACHMENT ''A' Ix w i > 1 i 1 l• ( o el— e • � � IOY 401.. Or PYSI'C Ie011 Rii • v AVP IlAlll rOZ.•fe • GI! ASS. PI AY"AREA •/1 rfl•t(1 le •• QSS OAIYL , ' I I ORA /4 RKM0 lOE ftt CAR�.I , I ••• -�/�., jo . nKuul 1] cen9 /yI /' i ��• E !� �r +� `L S � - K � 11 JeA[�ILv �ltreAll Zo 11 f'J; . 11 10 lrh, cou1E1 L Y••• — -- 10 Dull 1 11, GA ZiX" 1;01 '1` f MIAI WAY 3:R OPtN ORASS IIAY YIELD ', r ID . I II �� I , /. • ! � 11 .: ren .,. •WALKWAY 11aN18 / .. .• '• •. • yj .•.nwe-. �.. •�.. r_..�. ., •���` , 1, r101I, Y•A( R I'lAV - • �+, P++• • e., ` ��/^^�•• i-�' 1•'•, �, •ly �• �� Pn�w e, Mfln1^11011 r.H EP'•ay1r1Y .. • /i • Pt1•✓•§•�-PBApN• Ga HrL 61 �! r [ ' �•{\ \ � p - „/ ORE(NOELY ACCESS f ���� C CITY OF HERMOSA REi • III 11P[[I I. •ry •• •.. •.w • r•...r•I , • " V or •..• •,• RO 'SvJ KIOP OGR AP IIIc fUR v(Y • • • 60U.0"' O/ IVSLIC P-009411 SOU111 1CIloo L 'An li 11 U i•M1GLIf.1VlI.W Page 9 3LI IX tj v j looll:)s 111noS A 3AvnS 3 lHdYUD 0 dOL D V 3 0 V S ON 8 3 IA JO k.L I D A-11� .-I —.9 1.?- z 3 No, 6 11-0 UL O"ed A—.� ., 'AA -t, 9 - UT kA AA Y flulj7lq 3:1s. A—.� ., 'AA -t, 9 - UT kA AA Y flulj7lq LF" =`ID AUTO ENTRY • �v EYTZ:IICR SUFF`.R C:RCLI'-ATION BJTMFUC.R BUFFER ARDMORE _ PARKEI'TE DEVE? OPE —14 �C<�}' eF�T PASSIVE _ LINKAGE R OPEN SPACE Ll � PICNIC LU PLAYGRCL.140 ~ PARKING �* TOT LOT Cl7 0 .. ENTRY TO C y I PARK: X CYPRESS AVENUE � R E S TR O O m —SHADE STRUCTURE SPORTS CCURT3 %I \ STORAGE BASKETBALL I t< VOLLEYBALL Hr OR PCCL / BASEBALL SCFTBALL �. FCCTBALL REC. EUILOING /'I' R , �� (rL-� „� SCCCEA STAFF PARKING HAROCCUR T L L� I � � 0-iZ\71 Page 11 FLA N X Fac; Cs�� S-30 U T C. 'CCL 7/ it P, —7-,1 n <,,7 r7 r -,e L POTENTIAL RECREATIONAL OP E'. SPACE BILTMORE SITE ocated on the Strand b- _w_=e.n. 1,11th and 1 � th Streets, this s_ t_ was once �. i ed by the Surf ant ..and Club which later became the Ei> tmore hotel . h= site is owned by the City and has been the object of citizen concern -Ince the hotel bui lding ::as removed in 1959. Trio measures afoul the sit; n the November 19 9 ba;! ct failed. one would have dedicate^ the Site %0 n urban pack/plaza; the ether would have comb_ned the urban park/plata i t!- retai 1 commercial uses. This Master Plan reco3Wends that this site I eslgnated as potential _=_zreatiCnal open Saace and develccer as an ureas arra. The B_ltWOre Site has been rezoned reSlden�lal IIedi L'm Qe.^.Slty. he Greg Jarvis Memorial, a sitting area looking over the ocesn and or tri sed of benches, drinking fountain, and ceramic plaque, is located cress the Strand from the Biltmore Site. ' SOUTH SCEOOL SITE ,outh School at 425 Valley Drive is a surplus school site, part of which been sold for private development. In its Open Space Element, the Cit .uo^'-ed a policy "to purchase or lease surplus school property ... so that .he ,,roperty can be main-ained for potential recreational open space and ,ecreation use; (and to) prohibit the use of designated potential -ecr eation open space for development- for other than potential recreation )pen space purposes even though sold to private ownership.". (Open Space ;lenient, P. 55) luring its June 27, )ublic its intent to ;ite as well as the )urchase is intended )reserved for public 1989 meeting, the Hermosa reach City Council made purchase the remaining 4.;i acres of the South Sc::ooJ .29 acres next to Edith Rodaway. Friendship Park. Thi: to provide potential recreational open space to be use for current and future generations. 1 proposal has also been made by Macpherson Oil Company to t::=_ School )istrict to leases one acre of the .South School site for oil storage: 'he site has a sandy slope on its west side on which the aban,"oned school wilding is located. When the site -was used by the Bilingual School, an .sohalt drive was instal'_ed from Valley Drive ac= oss the sit= to parking e^ind the building Access to this parking w;.ich had previc sly been fry th Street had been bloc.._d by b:.i ldir_S.. I.n. acon, t::e s_ta ccnt�i ns 1 d play equipment that _s r uStE^_ and in d_sreair. Res_den :__l uses rl 'a! -est. and South Sides cf the sit-_, and SO^ew::at unsightly .:;,. rCial/in QllStrlel uses aro lccatEd O the ncr,h. Valley Crive is cJacent to the entire e?st side Of the Site. =.�:^JsS Valley rive is t^e reenbelt and Ardmore par::-_tte. evelooment 'of this site as a par'. •would help rzeet the City's need �or ter-^o�^inn f=r-C=am Dl =n `' n -;_r-? fry^ nnccii�� timet! SOUTH SCHOOL OBJECTIVE: to acquire this site by lease or, purchase from the School District and develop it as a park. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL • Create entry and parking away from Valley Drive. • Develop typical neighborhood park facilities: • sportsfield. . hardcourt area. • playground and tot lot. • restroom. . open play/passive area. • Convert building to recreation use. • Relate the park to Greenbelt and Ardmore Parkette. - • Design irrigation system. Estimate of probable c.-st: Acquisition S1,600,000 Development . SS06400 Note: Some workshcp parm:c:Oan s t; zugOt that South School would �e alocation f Or a CC', ,Uhl t_! sa imm—, ng ;zol if the need is determined. Tha -�St a pool is not inciucEd in the est. -Mate of probable cost. Page 13 SOUTH SCHOOL CONCEPTUAL PLAN: USE BY % RECREATION FACILITIES (9.0%) BUILDING (2.09'0) ldfilol GRASS/TURF/SOFTSGAPE ((jU.U9'o) Attachment C Page 14 EMENT (13.0%) PARK/CITY TYPE OF PARK SOUT11 SC1100L PARK Multi -use 11ERNOSA BEACH Neighborhood PARKING SPACES 11EIG11BOR1iOOD PARKS NO. OF SPACES MARINE AVE. PARK Multi -use MANIIATTAIJ DCII 5.5 LTVE OAK Multi -use 11ANIIAT l'AIJ B('11 15.5 GLEN ANDERSON! Multi -use REDONDO DC11 15.4 ALTA VISTA Multi -use REDONDO BCH WILDERNESS PARK Passive REDONDO BCH (picnic/camping) PERRY PARK Multi -use REDONDO I3CH Neighborhood ALTA I.OJ-JA Multi -use TORI?A1.1CE EL 1,1IDO Multi -use TORRANCE EL RETIRO Multi -use TORRA14CE Neighborhood GREEN WOOD Multi -use TORRANCE I]CMASTER Multi -use TORRANCE 25 93 + TRW adjacent 139 128 164 48 57 10 60 70 15 67 pAf7P I r. ATTACHMENT ACRES SPACES PER ACRE 11.51 5.5 7.6 12.2 8.95 15.5 5.8 22 10.68 15.4 11.0 4.4 ll. 13 13.8 5.7 1.8 12.3 4.9 4.8 14.6 3.44 )1.4 5.5 12.2 § 9? H=-..tifOSA B E-kC C= COD:. § 9.5 ARTICLE 9-2. RESERVED' Secs. 9-2-9,91. Reserved. ARTICLE 95. 0-S OPEN SPACE ZONE; Sec. 95. Intent and purpose. The 0-S zone is intended to prohibit intensive urban develop- ment to those primary open space areas of the city which are •Edit.or's note—Orsi- No. 82.694, adopted July 13. 1982, repealed former §§ 9.2-92.' which per -.pined to an O= overlay existing development district and was derived from Ord. No. 81.679, § 3, adopted'Dec S. 1981. tEdit.or's note—Orsi- No. N.S. 503, § 1, adopted Dec =. 1974, added Art. 9.5, §§ 9.5-9.5.8, to App. A as herein Set out_ Additionally, it should be noted that an initiative Ord. No. 81.761. §§ 1-4, passed. approved, and adopted by the elector• au at a special election held Nov. 6, 1934, provided that the approval of the electorate of the city be required to modify, amend, or repeal the land use element or the open apace element of the City of Hermosa Beach General Plan concerning thou ceruin lands desmbed in the ordinance. Subsequently, Ord. No. 86.044, § § •—d, passed by the electorate at the general election held Nov, 4, 1986, provided i follows; , Section 1. Any proposed modification. amendment, or elimination of the Open Space designated arras of the General Plan identified in Section 2 of this ordinance and shown on Exhibit A. available in the ofrice of the City Cleric. shall be prohibited without a vote of the electorate. Section 2. The following General Plan Open Space designated arra shall remain as such as stated in Section 1 herein: 1. Valley Park (Gould Ave. & Vailey DrJ 2 South Park /Bicentennial (4th Str-etl 3. Greenwood Park (Aviation & P.0 aJ 4. Fort Uts-of-Fun Park (6t1h St.-eet) 5. Seaview Park (19th St. & Presnect) 6. Clark Stsdiur Rec__ation Center (Valley Dr. & 11_'t SL) 7. Ingleside Park Qn;ieside and 33rd SL) ; 8. Mo -and= Park (N. of Meyer CL & S. of ^.ad SU 9. 8th and Valley Park 10. Ard=ore Ave- at 5th SL-eet Park 11. Hes rasa View Sc ool site 12. Prospect Heights Sc ool site 13. South School site Supp. No. 5-08 COS Page 16 APD=N7i 1:{ A—Z0; tING § 9.5 14. Herrresa Valley School site 15. Nor --h Schwa site Section 3. If any section or portion of this initiative ordnance is deciarrd invalid by a court of r: coer juradic:ion, the reM_glming sections or porcom are to be ccnsidued valid. Section 4. By this orci:.ancr- Initiative Ord; nano No. 84-761 (0 -pen Space Initiative) adocted by the people on November 6, 1934, is hereby e= essiy re�eaied. . Section 5. There ah -ail be no codificat-,'= amendment or reveal of any provi- sion hertim exce7t by a vote of the peooie- Supp. No. 5-08 Page 17 LPFSVDa A—ZONING § 9.J-1 necessary to assn --e pe=anent odea space in and for public Darks and recreation a_Teas-,"=d where suca Ln:er-sive urpan develop- ment would adversely a_—lac: public use and natural eaviron.men- tal benefits. (Ord_ No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74) Sec. 9.5-1. Permitted uses. Primary open space comprises public and private areas devoted to recreational, leisure, c•._1t sal and aesthetic purposes, and in- cludes the followingj�ises: (a) Public and private parks, including beach areas. (b) Educational buildings and playgrounds. (c) Rec:reation centers, public and private. (d) Public utility strictures and corridors. (e) Riding, bic•;cling and hiking trails and pedestrian ways. (f) Public Bove--nmental buildings. , (g) Historical monuments and areas of -historical significance. ; (l) Public malls and plaz-is. .(i) Public or privately owned land when the intensive use of said land would endanger t1t= public health, safety or gen. er al welfare, including. (1) Areas where natu.-al topography may be so stzep as to =eate a hazard ard,4or where the grading or develop. ment of the land would endanger public health or safety due to u:s:-ble geologic cnditions, soil i=ta- bility, erosion, or flooai:.g. (2) AMa.s subje- to sever` sf-=r; - ha ar,..s, inEuding f77urrfa= n•+ uV=I—_L .�., LUlEng or g�c* Sl L;—g_ - (3) *Auras subje= to ooang or inu:.:.atron ivy. stor-a water ()) Lund wn:c. :s su=- i:- y in is naniral sta:4 is of urucue nar--u.i bea .- (nan--al la_^.d forms, p~•-ir:ent fearur—, viss,.ss) available to. pub- Su,o. No. 4-87 ^� • - uVQ Pa 2e io -2 HEF.MOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 9.5"0 c acc-_.s or view; or which is or pa. z*c:1ax historic, ='I or scentinc value. (k) Ocean or public water areas, said areas being res" cted solely to recreation and navigation purposes. (1) Transit uses: (1) The accommodation of railroad tracks and mainte- nance of same. (2) Signals (and other operative devices). (3) The movement of rolling stock, freight, passengers. (4) Landscaping and related appurtenances. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74; Ord. No. 82-701, § 1, 8-24-82) >ec. 9.5-2. Lot coverage. Ma;imum building coverage of land area in the 0-S zone shall .ot e-xceed ten (10) percent. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-2"3-74) ;ec. 9..5-3. Height. No building shall exceed a height of two (2) stories or twenty. (25) feet above the existing or finished grade, whichever i9 - -d. No. N.S. 503, 1, 12-Z2.74)' Tec- 9.5-4. Off-street parking IimitatiorL No more than t -en (10) percent of land area ahaIl be used or off-street parking required or not. (Ord. No. 503, § 1, .2-23-74) ec. 9.54. Building setbacks. All st:--sctares shall be set bats from all lot lines not less than went -y (20) feet. (Ori No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74) ;ec. 9.5-6. Signs. Total sign area shall not exceed one (1) percent of land area and d� be wall or grouna signs oniy. All new sig_s shall be re- -iewed by the improvement com=,ssion ' prior to tyeir instzlla- - .on. (Ord. No. N 503, §' 1. 12-23-74) ��. No. 4-87 510 - Page lA 7 5 9.5.7 APPENDIX A-7,OVING 4 9.62.2 Sec. 9.5-7. Landscaping. All yard or open areas shall be attractively landscaped with the possible exception of where such areas are used for court games, buildings or parking. All landscaped areas shall be per- manently irrigated. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12.23-74) Sec. 9.5-8. Planned development permit required. All ne%v construction within an 0-S 'zone shall be subject to obtaining a planned development permit under procedures set forth in article 7.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. N.S. 154, as amend ed. Sections 9.5-2 through 9.5-7 may be waived or modified where in the opinion of the planning commission topogrnphy andlor - design considerations warrant such waiver or modification. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23.74) ARTICLE 9.6 SPECIFIC PLAN- AREAS r; [DIVISION 1. GENERALLY) / [Secs. 9. 0, 9.61. Reserved]. ' D ISION 2. PLAN AREA NO. Sec. 9.62-1. Authorr This specific plan areays an instru ent for implementing. the P Plan - general plan pursuant to ti le 8�hapter 3, of she State Plan ning and Zoning Law (Califon. a vernment Code Sections 65450 et seq). (Ord. No. 86-860, 10- \ . Sec. 9.62-2. Locatiory and description. _ The subject pro rty is fronting on 6t Street and is generally known as 721, 3 Sixth Street. The propartY consists of two (_, lots which sloping to the west, and have.,a total area of five_ thousand/eight hundred eighty-seven and twtenths (5,SS7.^_)! Xsquarfeet. (Ord. No. 86-860, 10.25 86) Supp. No. 6.89 511 Page 20- - -. n ATTACHMEMT "F" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: January 4, 1992 TO: Mary Rooney, Director of Community Resources FROM: Charlie McDonald, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: South School Park Site I have reviewed the encroachments in the field and find the following: 1. Lot #23 has the building face virtually on the alley property line. The rear yard enclosed by a 3'-4' high wall occupies the entire 10' alley. 2. Lot #24 has a sauna enclosed by a chain link fence which encroaches across the alley and into the park site a couple of feet. 3. The building at lot #27 has a stairway leading to the second floor which is an encroachment onto the alley. 4. At the northwest corner of the park site there are two chain link fences across the panhandle south of the alley. The northerly adjoining lot is enclosed with a wood board fence. There is no question but that these encroachments, whether covered by permit or not, may be inconsistent with the ultimate park use. However, until plans are imminent which conflict with these encroachments, the owners should not be contacted. There are two reasons for this. a. It would be rather poor public relations to require the removals unless the property was needed for improvements. b. There are numerous other projects with much higher priorities which should be pursued by the limited staff that we currently have in Public Works. Page 21 A current partial listing of Public Works projects follows: Fix Roof at Clark Field Assembly Bldg. Hermosa AVe. (Using FAU funds) Annual Street Resurfacing Tree Planting (DOFFP grant) Crosswalk at 29th & Manhattan Pier Sewer Head -Loss Check City Horizontal & Vertical Control Continue Pressure on Massey Ave. Storm Drain Sewer Repair Project Rodaway Park Resurface Tennis Courts Clark Field Wall & Fencing Storm Drains Budget Preparation ty/cmmr Page 22 —per--- / • o N L .'L4 C N o w. ♦ ,86'201 0£ ,Lb .LL N ..... eti D,00 '0£ M.bZ ,01 .31 N 00.01 / 3.9£ ,6b,LL N ` (- 0- ------------------ E`r \ , � `•\ \ � `_'- -- -- • - � ". _---�--. �p �_- -� �� �- _�ss,� -\ mod` c x X-:��X--- -- X- x x x X 17. 091 m.t7Z .01 Z I N 4 1 -x X - X -T7 ATTACHMENT "G" HEARING SOUTH SCHOOL PARR CONCEPTUAL PLAN. Recommended Action: To review and make recommendation. Ms. Rooney presented the Staff Report and recommended, after discussion, the conceptual plan be forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. She noted the Planning Staff supported the proposed concept of a "multi -use" park, detailed the proposed uses and stated the most intensive recreational facilities would be located in the northeast portion of the park. Ms. Rooney commented upon Staff's concerns regarding parking availability and impact upon the neighborhood.' Ms. Rooney detailed other areas for consideration included parking access directly from Valley Drive, continued maintenance of the existing building, possible visibility obstruction by the proposed berms and the adequacy of -the buffering and perimeter fencing adjacent to the residences to the soLrth and west. Discussions had been held regarding installation of a swimming pool, which would change the flavor of the park. The Commission recommended the park be designed to accommodate a future pool location, but that it not be addressed immediately. Ms. Rooney discussed the donation of property adjacent to the park which improved the possibilities of parking, vehicle and pedestrian access to. the park. She felt the Commission had reflected in the majority 7the suggestions made by the people who had responded, regarding the park activities. P.C. Minutes 2-16-93 Page 25 r � .. .. .. � r • ... wt. .�1'1 ..w r�r�. .r.w.r.wi...wr...r Comm. Marks felt precious land was being used to parking and discussed the handicapped parking requirements, park elevations, current condition and facilities within the existing building with Ms. Rooney and Mr. McDonald, Public Works Director. Chmn. Merl felt the use of bicycles should be encouraged and discussed with Ms. Rooney the expense of building maintenance, community needs, future revenue streams being considered and possible parking needs based upon park uses. Comm. Di Monda discussed with Ms. Rooney the possibility of renting office spaces within the existing buildings. He requested that the potential parking requirement be provided, noting the building was definitely below standards. Comm. Di Monda felt the park did not have adequate planned parking and objected to the provision of three spaces for maintenance staff and the large driveway. Steve Crecy, PRCR Commissioner, responded by explaining the PRCR Commissioners had felt the parking should be pulled away from the residential area, with only a few spaces left for maintenance and other needs. He stated the PRCR Commission had determined that, although there was cosmetic work needed, the brick re -enforced building was very sound and had been worked into the proposed plan. Mr. Crecy discussed the park access and the maintenance crew access provided by the proposed road. Comm. Di Monda suggested the 10 -foot walkway be designed as a bicycle or roller-skating path. Ms. Rooney responded affirmatively, also detailing the areas for sedimentary activities. Dani Peirce, PRCR Commissioner, discussed a proposed shaded area near the tennis courts which would allow people to engage in other activities while waiting to use the courts. She discussed with Comm. Di Monda the walkway provisions 'for security and ease of use for children's strollers and pedestrians. She noted the topography "rolling effect" of the proposal which would enhance the feeling of a neighborhood park. Chmn. Merl thought this was very effective. Comm. Di Monda commented that installation of a pool would change the parking requirements. Ms. Pierce felt the aspect of the park would be entirely changed if a pool were installed and would result in redesign of the park and an additional parking requirement. Comm. Di Monda agreed access should be at Cypress Avenue and not Valley Drive. Ms. Rooney stated the City's tennis courts were heavily utilized, volleyball. supplies would be on a "bring your own" basis due to present finances. Comm. Suard suggested the building be used for handball and ping pong. Ms. Rooney P.C. Minutes 2-16-93 Page 26 C responded that currently a revenue stream was not available to support the opening of the building. She explained the open grass field could be used for practice by Little League and other children's sports organizations, but not for actual games. She explained the City had seriously deleted the Parking Lot Facility Tax Fund by the purchase of this property and discussed the possible availability of other funding, as well as the prioritization of the park's development. Comm. Di Monda stated the basketball courts at Clark Stadium remained lit even when it was raining or not in use and suggested "pay for lighting" machines be installed to assure the lights were off when the courts were not in use. Ms. Rooney stated the PRCR Commission had concluded this was not a cost effective solution due to vandalism and commented her Staff could turn the lights off when it was raining. Comm. Suard discussed with Ms. Rooney the possibility of the park having an area -for dogs, which had been rejected by the PRCR Commission. Ms. Rooney noted dogs could be in the park if they were on leashes. Hearing opened by Chmn. Merl at 9:08 p.m. Francis Parker, 521 1/2 Loma Drive, suggested the Commission visit the site. She stated that problems had been experienced by the residents due to parties, drugs, homeless people and fights. The only time that area was peaceful was when the park had been closed to access. She suggested the installa- tion of light-sensitive lighting for security purposes. She felt the access could recreate vehicle confusion due to the narrow streets, noting several residents used Loma Drive as an access to their garages. Others would see them enter the street and think it was an access street. She felt that street widths should be considered when access streets were determined. She mentioned that when Loma Drive access had been gated because of the problems experienced with signs slanting and asphalt cracking due to sliding sand. She felt this area was inappropriate for placement of handicapped ramps or other construction. Tom Morley, Loma Drive, felt the plan was excellent, was pleased`to see a proposal for an area in which children could safely play and recommended the Commission tour the park to view the narrowness of the street, pedestrian access and the proposed location of the wheelchair ramp. Be stated the - wheelchair ramp location was not practical or sensible. He recommended that sand -based volleyball courts be installed rather than basketball courts. J.R. Revicsky, PRCR Commissioner, stated the proposed 10 -foot walkway was for security purposes, in that a police car could maneuver when necessary. The Loma Drive access for both P.C. Minutes 2-16-93 Page 27 handicapped and other vehicles was included in the initial plans, although no clear requirements have been determined. Further review will be conducted prior to implementation. Provision had been made for a volleyball court, based upon expressed needs and for the convenience of residents. He stated other parks within .the City had basketball courts with no parking provided and were not experiencing any problems. He stated the parking, by design, was small to assure this would be a neighborhood park. Comm. Marks commended the quality of the presentation drawing. Mr. Revicsky stated Brian Mitchell, a local resident, had made the drawing, had donated his time and efforts, and made the. Commission's job.easier. No one else wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Hearing at 9:26 p.m. Comm. Di Monda noted his philosophical difference with the plans, in that he felt the Police Dept. did their best work when walking within the parks. He objected strongly to the roadway. Ms. Rooney reiterated the need of access for the maintenance crew. Comm. Di Monda felt the maintenance crew should also walk within the park. Chmn. Merl expressed the Commission's desire to see as much "green area" as possible and thanked the Parks and Recreation Dept., as well as Ms. Rooney, for the presentation. The Commission agreed the presentation was excellent. MOTION made by Comm. Suard, seconded by Comm. Marks, to SUPPORT of the conceptual plan as -submitted, with inclusion of the comments made by the Planning Commission. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Suard, Chmn. Merl NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Oakes ABSTAIN: None V-6 - PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY LANDSCAPING PROGRAM. Recommended mon: To direct Staff as dee propriate: Mr. Schubach stated r.epor ad been prepared after sending a memo had been sent ouncil, who had approved the idea. He explained thr suggeste lternatives, noted the City would be fund' the landscaping wi the assistance of possible gr�wh�ich could be further inve ated. Mr. Schubach licensed landscan_e architect wou ve�-to draw plans. He stated that if a grant were not obtain City would have to pay for the maintenance. P.C. Minutes 2-16-93 Page 28 rs CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL 1 FROM: STEPHEN R. BURRELL, CITY MANAGER - SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM THE REDONDO BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO WAIVE FEE FOR FILMING THE REDONDO BEACH SUPER BOWL SUNDAY. 10K RUN/5K WALK DATE: JANUARY 20, 1994 Due to the late receipt of the letter from John Parsons of the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce, it has not been evaluated by staff. As you can see, they are requesting a waiver of the filming fees and staff will provide an oral report on their request.at the meeting. �J 01/20/19'34 17,:17_12' FRI i('1 C:OHTE FF'ODUCTIOHS TO January 1g, i994 72SIE'r, P.02 RECEIVED JAN 2 0 1994 CITY MGR. OFFICE Mayor and C11 -Y. -Council City of HermcJa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Reach, CA 90254 RE: Redordo Beach Super Bawl Sunday Mile Dear Mayor and City Council: This is an official ►-ecuest from the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce to be included on the City Council agenda `or the meeting of January 25, 1994 to discuss the tees associated with the Super Bow! Mile which is the opening event of the upcoming Redondo Beach Suer F3owl Sunday 10K Run ,9K Walk. The event will take place on Sunday, January 30, 1994. As you know the Redondo Beach Visitor's Bureau has contracted with Marty Liguori Producti:)ns to produce a half hour television program about the Redondo Beach 10K run which will be aired on ESPN the following Sunday, February 6 at 9:00 a.m. PST. The fee for filming in Hermosa Beach for, this event has been assessed at $1,317.75, The Super Bowl Mile races will take less than two minutes in Hermosa Beach. In order to film the race in its entirety a special motorcycle equipped with a side cat, for the camera man would precede the race along with our pace car and lead police motorcycle. we would like to give the City of Hermosa teach acknowledgment in the national airing of the start of the race bUt th,e fee is prohibitive. Current plans are to pick up the race at the Redondo boarder and film from there to the - finish line. We would request that the City of Hermosa Beach waive the fee for filming the event in your City so that you will be included on our national coverage on ESPN, 'hank you for your assistance in this matter. We appreciate your continued support in this endeavor. Sincerely, John Parsons, President Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce Redondo Bele! CnM*W Of ftWMC r 1215 N. Catalina Ave., Redondo Bea. -,t CA 90277 Phone; 3101376 -o -.Q1 i Fax., 310/37¢73x3 X&* CCM Pradbcflm 212 Yacht Club Way, Suite 0, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Phone. 31"t -248s Fa c: 3, on98,2577 . January 19, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 "LA ONLINE" COMPUTER ACCESS SERVICE Recommendation Receive as information item, acknowledge sponsorship by the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce for one (1) year funding, and provide general direction to staff to coordinate the effort. Background LA ONLINE has presented a proposal to provide some basic on-line services that would be available by modem to computer users. The Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors approved funding for this service on a one (1) year basis. The cost is $150 per month or $1,800 for the first year. The system has additional capabilities and, depending on the usage, might be helpful to our residents, business operators and visitors. The only cost to the City in order to implement the services generally would be staff time to upload the material by modem. There may be a need for an additional modem, however, this is the only "out of pocket" expense anticipated. The system has the ability to provide feedback so that staff will be able to provide an evaluation to both the Chamber of Commerce and the City Council as to whether it should be continued after the first year. Mr. Dave Silverberg of LA ONLINE will be present at the meeting to answer any questions that you might have. Respectfully submitted, ZW1 Stephen k Murrell City Manager 10 a i LA L.A.ONLINE ONLINE Public Computer -Access Services =________ For the City of Hermosa Beach Service Period; 2/15/94 - 2/14/95 Service features; - E -Mail to council members, mayor, department heads - On-line Agendas and Minutes - On-line City Calendar - 24-hour accessibility, no cost or logins required. - Compatible with MAC's, IBM's, terminals. . . - Post Production of City Agendas, Minutes, Calendars Service does not include; - On-line Discussions with two-week summary reports - On-line applications for employment or City Commission Posts - On-line Community Development Information Service Costs; Network Access Charge ($800/quarter) Production Services ($150/month) Contribution: LA ONLINE Network Credit Contribution: HB, Chamber of Commerce COST TO fFIE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ANNUAL COST $3,200 1,800 5,000 (3,200) (1,800) 0 1/19%94 1332 Hermosa Avenue, Suite 7 • Hermosa Beach • CA 90254 • 310 372-9364 L.A.ONLINE SOURCE MATERIALS for more Informallon call 310-372-9361 L.A.ONLINE CITY -ACCESS SERVICES JANUARY 1994 USES U Public E -Mail to Mayors Office Council Members U U U U U Department Heads On-line Agendas or Minutes On-line "Discussions" with two-week summary On-line Community Development Information On-line Calendars of Events and reports' On-line Applications for Employment or City Commission Posts ACCESSIBILITY U 24 -Hour Unlimited Free -Access U No login's, passwords required except for Staff U Multi -line, Simultaneous Use U Compatible with IBM. MAC, terminals and standard communications software. First-time callers have no terminal set-up requirements. STAFF SUPPORT U Production Provided by L.A.ONLINE U No Extra Equipment Needed U Ability to set up multiple mail pickup points U _ Customer Support provided by L.A.ONLINE U Low Cost Available March 1994 City ui ncuonao rseacn October 19, 1993 TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council 1 Electronic Bulletin Board Service Ken Simmons, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARD SERVICE 3 Z b, 0 CT 1 91993 At the Council meeting of September 21. 1993, Councilman Pinzler requested that staff review the efforts of other cities, such as Santa Monica and Diamond Bar in providing electronic information access. Staffs review of these cities provided the following: - City of Santa Monica PEN System (Public Electronic Network) System originated in 1989 assisted by the donation of hardware from Hewlett- Packard. The system has a national reputation for comprehensiveness. It is a seven day a week, 24 hour per day service free to all persons who live, work or attend school in Santa Monica. Access is from any home or office computer, or from any of 20 public terminals at libraries, or community centers via 32 incoming phone lines allowing 64 users at any one time. Among the services available are the following: o Network offers over 250 menu items of information including City jobs, bus schedules, calendar of events, school district news, police tips, earthquake precautions. Searchable data bases offered include City County agenda and minutes for 5 years; social services directories and access to the library catalogue. a All City departments and councilmembers have electronic _ mailboxes. City answers an average of 200 public inquiries a month. - 3z. b. OCT 19 1993 _ . /nctober 19, 1993 Electronic Bulletin Board Service ❑ Network offers a conferencing system by which participants may discuss various issues by exchange of mail messages. ❑ On-line forms are offered to sign-up for recreation classes, renew a business license; report petty theft or make a consumer complaint. System Cost: $350,000 • Support Costs: 140,000 'Equipment donated by Hewlett-Packard City of Diamond Bar City On -Line Recently initiated, 2 phone line system providing access to Council agenda and minutes. Mail access is also provided. Limited public notices. City is in a test mode to determine success. There are ambitions for expanding the system, but no current plan or schedule. System Cost: $30,000 • Support Costs: 45,000 'City also received approximately $700,000 in donated equipment. Project is driven by private individual; a writer in computer and technology fields who is currently developing a book on public access systems for cities. City of Glendale Planning for project was initiated in 1990. Has been delayed since expected start-up date of Fall in 1991. Project attempts to build up from Santa Monica with additional emphasis on multimedia approach, combining video, audio and computer. Informational kiosks through touchscreen applications to be provided in City mall and City facilities. System Cost: $2.5 million to date Support Costs: No Estimate ILy , �pctober 19, 1993 Electronic Bulletin Board Service City of Manhattan Beach Single phone line system started in October 1993. System to provide agenda and. minutes; City event schedule. Mail system to be developed later. Only current information is available on-line, plan is to provide older agenda and minute information for downloading only. System Cost: $5,000 Support Cost: 25,000 A resident of the .community has also suggested the City subscribe to Internet. Internet is a global computer mail distribution system used by universities, as well' as public libraries, corporations and other computer subscription referral systems. Users are charged anywhere from $20 'per month for individual accounts to $900 per month for corporate accounts. Staff is not aware of any California city which subscribes to the network. Submitted by: KEN SIMMONS Assistant City Manager rb cakekct.bulletin Carol Hunt Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce City of Hermosa Beach 323 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 December 29, 1993 Dear Carol, It was a pleasure speaking with ,you about placing Hermosa Beach "On- line". As I mentioned, Naomi Valdes and Joe Duckett for Hermosa have expressed interest in finding a sponsor for an on-line access service whereby city agendas and city E-mail would be made available (free of charge) to the public, pending city council approval. LA ONLINE provides such a service to the cities of Redondo Beach and Hawthorne and could set one up for Hermosa Beach as well. We would provide all set-up and ongoing maintenance of the service. No equipment purchases would be needed since we operate our own on-line network. Outside sponsorship of $1,800 annual would be required and as we discussed, I would greatly welcome your support. As a sponsor, the on- line service would include; ❑ Hermosa Chamber of Commerce Special Section (to include information on events, etc..) ❑ Electronic MAIL to City of Hermosa Beach Council Members and Department heads. ❑ Upload/Download of City Agendas (ASCII and X -Modem) ❑ On-line Viewing of City Agendas ❑ Agenda Upload Box (For Hermosa Staff Only) ❑ E -Mail Download Box (For Hermosa Staff Only) I'll talk to, you later about the service and look forward to meeting you. President LA ONLINE Hawthorne Enters the.Computer Age HAWTHORNE COMMUNITY NEWS 1/13/94 concept would be to get more real By LISA NICOLAYSEN participation in government," he Staff Writer said. Imagine punching a few keys on a Silverberg's company brings computer and instantly sending a message to the program to cities at a cost as the mayor, finding out how to get tax breaks low as $6,000 a year for i for your business or tapping into the City operating costs since L.A. Council meeting minutes. It may seem like a vision of the future, but ONLINE provides start-up equipment off-site. "The only Hawthorne residents can now plug into a 24- reason cities haven't done this is This is a break for them," hour on-line computer program that provides cost. he said. a variety of city information at no cost In other cities like Santa Using a personal computer and modem, Monica, the program can cost Hawthorne residents can now use the anywhere from $50,000 to computer program to access agendas and $100,000 a year. The start-up minutes for the City Council and cost in Santa Monica was commissions, information about the Los approximately $350,000, -Angeles Revitalization Zone and low-interest Silverberg said, and that city now home improvement loans. Residents can also - :send messages to elected city officials and pays more than $140,000 in yearly staffing support costs. department heads through an electronic mail "Imagine if a city were to start program.. from scratch," he said. "They're "It's endless what we can do here," said just not equipped to do that." City Clerk Danny Juarez, who worked with As residents warmup to using Deputy City Clerk Laura Seo and L.A. computers to access city - ONLINE President David Silverberg to bring information, Silverberg hopes to the program to Hawthorne in late December. bring another program to and other cities he ::.Starting off with a basic information Hawthorne In the next few months, bulletin board, Juarez said as the program services. Hawthorne's City Council could catches on, services will expand to access thebe able to come to the public for city's ordinances and resolutions. information, by sending out Intended to give Hawthorne government questions about issues through more accessibility to its residents, some the computer program that sparks computers users are already tapping into the discussion through E-mail. program, including Carol Mayer. "That's like having the city "I was real excited about it It's teal simple work 'for you," Silverberg said. to set up. I think I'll use this a lot," she said. "It allows you to generate more One feature of the program that appealed to participation." A council for example, could send Mayer was a list of city commissions that member, 'the out to computer users includes openings and provides an application question of the city's utility users that residents can fill out and send tax and receive input electrdttically to the City Clerk's office. electronically from residents By bringing Hawthorne into the computer during a two-week response The would use age, the City Clerk's office will cut down on period. council that information to help residents calling in for information, since they determine the community's will now be able to get it themselves. Seo said on a variety of issues. the workload in the City Clerk's office has opinions Even now, a resident can use not decreased, but changed to meet the needs Hawthorne's new program to send of the new program. "It's not really designed messages to city officials, posing to decrease the workload," she said. questions that would otherwise. be "The. Silverberg credits Seo for helping to aired at council meetings. establish the program. in Hawthorne. "She's gadflies will still be able to give really done an incredible amount of work," he input, but they're not taking said. away from the participation of As president of L.A. ONLINE, Silverberg others," Silverberg added. said the intent of the program is to bring government to the people. "Ultimately, the MEETINGS DAYS & TIMES FOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARDS & COMMISSIONS CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY BOARD 3rd Monday - 7:OOpm PLANNING COMMISSION 1st & 3rd Tuesday - 7:OOpm DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION 1st & 3rd Wednesday - 6:OOpm CIVIL SERVICE BOARD 3rd Wednesday - 5:OOpm PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION 3rd Thursday - 7:OOpm SUPPLEMENTAi � O INFORMATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEPHEN R. BURRELL, CITY MANAGER A SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE TIME OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS DATE: JANUARY 20, 1994 At its meeting of January 11, 1994, members of the City Council expressed a desire to change the time of the regular City Council meetings from 7:OOpm to 7:30pm. Attached you will find background information and a resolution to initiate this change if you so decide. Alternative Receive and file In 10b March 17, 1993 Regular Council Meeting March 23, 1993 Mayor and Members of City Council RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE TIME OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Recommendation: Adopt the attached draft resolution establishing 7:00 p:m. as the time for the holding of regular City Council meetings, effective June 1, 1993, to allow ample time to publicize the change. Background: At its meeting of March 9, 1993, the City Council directed the preparation of an ordinance for Council consideration to change the _ time of regular City Council meetings from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. A review of the current Code reveals that a resolution, not an ordinance, would be the appropriate document to effect this change. While Section 2-1 of the Municipal Code had previously specified the time and the days of the month that regular meetings were held (per attached Ordinance No. N.S. 492, adopted June 18, 1974), Ordinance No. 86-823 (also attached), adopted on February 11, 1986, amended Municipal Code Section 2-1 to read, in part, as follows: "The city council shall hold regular meetings at least once a. month at times fixed by resolution of the city council." A resolution (No. 86-4961) was adopted by the Council on July 26, 1986, which, in part, establishes the regular City Council meeting dates as the second and fourth Tuesdays . of each month, but makes no mention of meeting times. Extensive research of Council. minutes and resolutions on and around the adoption dates of the above -noted ordinance and resolution has thus far not revealed a resolution establishing 7:30 p.m. as the regular meeting time, although that had bebn the time previously specified in the Code and to date has consistently been the time.of regular meetings. P Elaine Do.erfling, City aerk Co ur: Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager ft I in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE TIME FOR HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Section 2-1 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to fix by resolution the time for holding its regular meetings; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to change the time of its regular meetings from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. since the public would be better served by starting the meetings earlier. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to Section 2-1 of the'Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the regular meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council shall be held at 7:00 p.m. Section 2. That this resolution shall take effect June 1, 1993, to allow ample time to publicize the change. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the - proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting in which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 23rd day of March, 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:- City Clerk City Attorne �i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OCHOA h SILLAS ATTO-NCVS AT LA - LOS AACELCS. CALIF. SACRAUENTO. CALIF. Ac -,J T ORDINANCE NO. 86-823 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, AMENDING SECTION 2-1 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE MANNER IN WHICH REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE SET. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to have more flexibility in the setting of its meetings in order to ensure maximum responsiveness to the public and maximum attendance by its members; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to bring its municipal ordinance dealing with the settinc of City Council meetings into closer harmony with provisions of the general law of the state found under California Government Code Section 36805. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.' That Section 2-1 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code be amended to read as follows: The city council shall hold regular meetings at least once a month at times fixed by resolution of the city council. When the day for any regular meeting falls on a legal holiday, no meeting shall be held on such holiday, but a regular meeting shall be held at the same hour on the following business day. The city council may adjourn any regular or adjourned meeting to a date specified in the order of adjournment. When so adjourned, .the adjourned meeting is a regular meeting for all purposes. • -1- ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 492 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA 9EACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, SECTION 2-1 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO THE TIME OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the Elections Code of the State of California now calls for all regular election dates to be established on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of the months of each year set aside for such elections; and (� WHEREAS, the regularly scheduled meetings of the City '- — --- -- ----- - Council of the City of Hermosa Beach are currently established as the first and third Tuesday of each month; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be in the best interest of the general public to eliminate any possible conflict between a citizen's attendance at a regular meeting of the City Council and reaching the polling place before the closing of the polls, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the first sentence of Section 271, Chapter 2, Article 1 of the City Code shall be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 2-1. Council meetings - when held; number of regular meetings. The City Council shall hold regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday in each month at the hour of 7:30 p.m." SECTION 2 This ordinance shall become effective thirty days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Hermosa Beach Review, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1974. PkESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California .ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO F RM: ley... CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 OCHOA h SILL -AS ATTOQb(TS AT LA.. LOS ANCCLCS. CALIF. SACAAY(dTO. CALIF. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 11th day of February, 1986. FRES-i7ENTMOF THE CITY COUNCIL MAYOR OF THE CITY OF NERMOSA BEACH ATTEST: CI CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY` ATTORNEY ' ._J-B7/AMD2-1 -2- L I 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 -11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE TIME FOR HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Section 2-1 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to fix by resolution the time for holding its regular meetings; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to change the time of its regular meetings from 7:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to Section 2-1 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the regular meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council shall be held at 7:30 p.m. Section 2. That this resolution shall take effect April 1,,1994, to allow ample time to publicize the change. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records d 7 9 9 10 -11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting in which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: OK$U4 I-v�� , CITY ATTORNEY Mayor and Members of the City Council VACANCIES - BOARDS AND APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING ONE UNEXPIRED TERM ENDING Recommendation: January 13, 1994 City Council Meeting January 25, 1994 COMMISSIONS COMMISSION JUNE 30, 1996 It is recommended that the City Council appoint from among the five applicants who were called back for a second interview to fill the unexpired Planning Commission term ending June 30, 1996. Background: At its meeting of January 11, 1994, after conducting scheduled interviews (which took place at 6 p.m., prior to the regular meeting) of all applicants seeking appointment to fill a vacant seat on the Planning Commission, the City Council selected five applicants to come back for a second, more in-depth interview, which was scheduled to take place at 6 p.m., Tuesday, January 25, prior to the regular meeting. The unscheduled vacancy arose in November due to the election of former commissioner Julie Oakes to the office of Member of City Council. Eleven applications were received during the advertised filing period. Nine of those applicants attended the first interview on January 11. For your consideration, the five applicants are as follows: Steven A. Crecy Alan M. Dettlebach Annie Moler Darrell Rockefeller Peter Tucker Noted: Stephe - rrell, City Manager Elaine Doerfling, Cit Clerk I 1 2 THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 1994. PLEASE REFER TO ITEM l I a OF THE JANUARY I I , 1994 AGENDA PACKET FOR PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONS. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council io FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning r$ctor l �.l SUBJECT: School District / C ty Council / Planning Commission Annual Joint Meeting DATE: January 18, 1994 It is the time for the annual School District/City Council/Planning Commission joint meeting. The last time it was held was on March 26, 1992. There was no meeting held in 1993 (directed by past City Manager). Staff would like the City Council to choose possible dates and topics for discussion, and will send your decision to the Planning Commission and School District for concurrence. NOTED: qa\ Stephen R rrell City Manage p/memoa - 1 - i1 b January 19, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 REQUEST OF COUNCIL MEMBER BENZ CONCERNING CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES Recommendation Review the report prepared by Ralph Anderson & Associates for Manhattan Beach (copy available for review in the City Clerk's office) and determine whether or not the City Council is interested in having staff prepare a similar evaluation. Background Council member Benz requested that the Council consider having City Attorney services be provided by a direct staff person rather than the current approach of contracting with the law firm of Oliver, Barr & Vose. The City of Manhattan Beach recently had a study conducted (copy attached) to determine whether or not it would be more cost effective to bring their City Attorney services in-house. The conclusion of the report was that, given the findings in Manhattan Beach, consideration should be given to making a possible transition to providing general City Attorney services in-house. It is important to keep in mind that the City does have, and most likely will continue to have, a need for a number of specialized legal services. The current array of litigation matters require the services of attorneys that would be outside the expertise, most likely, of a staff City Attorney. If the City Council is interested in a similar review, it is suggested that the effort begin now and it be brought to a conclusion as part of the 1994-95 budget. Staff would proceed first by completing a review of all legal costs and develop a recommendation for City Council as to whether or not it would be desirable to retain a consulting firm to perform a study similar to the one Manhattan Beach received. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. B 11 City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL 12b INFORMATION Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council . ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY DECEMBER, 1993 January 25, 1993 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department activity for the month of December. Permit activity increased in December as the department issued 106 permits of which 24 were building permits. No permits were issued for new struc- tures while eighteen permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings. Four permits were issued for alterations or additions to commercial buildings. There was no change to the housing inventory. The department also processed thirty-six plans for zoning review, plan check or revisions. Plan processing "turn around" averaged more then three weeks during December. The department conducted 83 inspections during December not including complaint investigations. The Business License division reports that 371 licenses were issued during December resulting in revenue of $53,578.14. The department logged 4 new code enforcement complaints during December which were for illegal dwelling units. The department currently has nine illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. Respectfully Submitted, i Sherria Lawrence Interim, Administrative Aide Concur: Michael Schubach Interim, Bldg. & Safety Director Noted: /%D Steve Bu ell City MaVager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of December 1993 DWELLING UNITS TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 1 700. 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 18 170,366 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldqs. 4 38,400 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publiclv owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldqs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwellinq units demolished 21. Other permits not listed: 2 3,000. TOTAL PERMITS: 25 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 212,466.00 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 0 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 0 NET CHANGE: 0 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 93/94 +1 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 9705 ** (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) ** Revised figure based on land use study by the Planning Dept. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of December 1993. NUMBER OF 12,136.72 32,506.85 THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY PERMITS CURRENT MONTH LAST FY DATE TO DATE Building 24 2,163,331.00 16 40 128 Plumbing 12 14 26 116 Electric 14 10 24 99 Plan Check 13 14 27 95 Sewer Use 0 1 1 1 Res. Bldg. Reports 21 14 35 103 Comm. Inspections 16 17 33 112 Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 0 In lieu Park & Rec. 0 1 1 2 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 3 5 8 21 Fire Flow Fees 3 5 8 27 Legal Determination 0 0 0 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 106 97 203 704 FEES Building** 4,734.52 8,798.39 17,753.10 44,478.36 Plumbing 870.55 718.20 2,242.09 7,718.60 Electric 1,781.20 968.10 3,413.35 8,790.05 Plan Check 2,058.95 5,361.83 9,189.19 27,314.30 Sewer Use 0 342.53 0 342.53 Res. Bldg. Reports 913.75 609.00 2,610.25 4,415.75 Comm. Inspections 696.00 738.25 1,959.50 4,711.25 Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 0 In lieu Park & Rec. 0 10,396.00 0 20,792.00 Board of Appeals 0 0 162.75 0 Sign Review 260.25 379.50 954.25 1,728.50 Fire Flow Fees 821.50 4,195.05 3,736.50 20,073.25 Legal Determination 0 0 0 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 12,136.72 32,506.85 42,020.98 140,364.59 VALUATIONS 212,466.00 776,909.00 2,163,331.00 3,178,053.00 **Includes State Seismic Fee $25.47 BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT Revenue: 53,578.14 48,743.97 220,177.27 Licenses issued: 371 362 210,583.00 January 4, 1994 Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 1994 Department of Community Resources Activity Report December, 1993 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of December. Annual Tree Lighting Ceremony In conjunction with the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, the Department was once again able to host this wonderful community event. With lights blazing and sirens blaring, the Los Angeles County Lifeguards provided transportation for Surfin' Santa Claus. Learned Lumber provided a antique truck for the community youths to visit with Santa. The Chamber also provided free pictures of Santa. Cruise of Light Excursion Two bus loads of people were able to enjoy the many sparkling lights and animated displays of beautiful homes in Huntington Harbor. This 45 minute narrated cruise was a wonderful way to usher in the holidays. With the many positive responses received, this will likely become an annual excursion. Sand Snowman Contest The threat of rain may have kept many of the people away but for the hearty souls that attended this was a outstanding event. Penguins of Hermosa Beach was the sponsor of this uniquely California event. There were winners in a variety of categories including, Most Traditional, Most Californian and Funniest. This was an event that was enjoyed by all. Letters to Santa Santa was very busy at the Community Center this holiday season answering over 40 letters written to him from area children. Warren Miller Ski Film The Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation presented two showings of the latest ski film from our local production company. Approximately 200 people enjoyed the chills, thrills and spills of a first rate ski film. Film Permits One still photography permit was issued for the month of December with a total revenue of $108. Field 82 89 Theater 91 105 Clark 216 185 Gymnasium 207 190 Room 8 95 108 Room 10 116 102 Room 12 82 96 Department Revenue Current Month Dec. 1992 Year to Date Last YTD $16,270 $20,881 $177,602 $181,876 Revenue Projection: $392,000 Department of Community Resources general fund revenue for 50% of the fiscal year is $177,602 or 45% of the projected figure. Department of Community Resources general fund expenditure for 50% of the fiscal year is $159,558 or 41 % of the budget FY 1993-94. Respectfully submitted, '—Jo-hn A. Newell Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources Concur: Ma jy,C-Rooney Dir ctor Community Resources Ak Stephen Burrell City M ager Fl Master sand -snowman builders Mike Evans of Ireland and Tisa Repolo of Hermosa Beach are congratulated by lfrom right) City Manager Mary Rooney, Dani Pierce, Dick McCurdy, Brian Mitchell, Brad Koppel and Steve Crecy. Photo by Kevin Cody. - Wednesday, Dec.1 Not Night - • i Hermosa's annual Tree lighting Gere- ! mony takes place tonight at 5:30 p.m. at the corner of Pier and Hermosa ave- nues. Santa will be present to hear all your holiday wishes. Music will be provided by the Hermosa Valley School Band. If you are of age you may attend the Chamber of Commerce mixer, which begins at 6 p.m. at Bank of America at 90 Pier Ave. Wednesday December 1 11H.B. TREE LIGHTING The city of Hermosa Beach will hold its annual tree lighting ceremony Wednes- day. Dec. I, 5 to 8 p.m., at Loreto Plaza on Pier Avenue. The public is invited. Wdto to Santa You can write to Santa Claus da Hermosa Beach Community Center, 710 Pier Ave., Hermosa Beach, Ca •90254. The letters received before Dec.' 14 will be'responded to by Santa or one of his elves. Be sure to include the child's name, age, school, and any spe. cific toy requests, names of siblings and pets. Ski film Catch the Warren Miller{ fever! See some of the beat . skiers and snowboarders rippin' it up across the United States, Canada and France. This Warren Miller film will be showing at the Hermosa Beach Civic Theater on Dec. 12. at 6:30 and 9 p.m. General admission is $10 and students, seniors, and children are $8. Call 318-0280. January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1994 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, DECEMBER 1993 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration 'ww"RTawk ---------------------------- MONTH THIS MONTH Invoices 157 Cash Receipts 1,305 Warrants 272 Purchase Orders 319 Discounts taken $333.21 UUT Exemptions 20,765 filed to date 809 Payroll 2,231 Full time 145 Part time 60 I THIS MONTH LAST FY 52 1,240 260 290 $134.82 707 162 56 Finance cashier FY TO I LAST FY DATE TO DATE 296 10,456 1,677 2,582 $1,907.62 280 9,641 1,780 2,006 $1,211.58 CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH I LAST FY I DATE I TO DATE Citation payments 3,089 2,633 22,941 20,765 Payments reed (DMV) 375 432 2,231 2,089 Delinquent Notices sent: California 3,619 1,622 13,644 14,827 Out -of -State 258 140 747 806 Dismissals 265 439 3,070 3,211 Booting revenue $ 3,593 $ 7,354 $33,827 $52,737 Finance Cashier (cont'd) CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH I LAST FY ( DATE I TO DATE Parking permits:* Driveway Permits -0- ** 8 ** Guest Party Passes 300 ** 1,728 ** Contractor Permits 2 ** 34 ** Daily Permits -0- ** 13 ** Annual Preferential: Transferable 19 ** 332 ** Vehicle 56 ** 650 ** RTD bus passes* 54 ** 317 ** Animal licenses* 32 ** 920 ** Traps rented* 1 ** 8 ** * These statistics were added effective March 1993. ** Not applicable until March 1994. NOTED: -/Ab Stephen B 11 City Manage Respectfully submitted: Viki Copeland, Finance Director HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1993 +- -Dec 31, 1993— !FIRE STATISTICS -! This Month i This Month ' Year to Date Last Ye::,r Calls —! One Year- Ago — — 62i 70 --- I To Date. 736 — 7551 False. Alarms ---- - -- 4--31-------6 4T---_._..-��, I'lutual Aid 11 Oj 1 II 1 `i Paramedic assists 41 • '9i 1103; Residence Fire Commercial Fire Vehicle Fire Hazardous Mtls 2; 4i 9i 3 71 541 281 17, 5611 — 261 23; Other61i 14; 120! -i 1631- --.__.—__-__ _- ...---�----.-.-----•--�------ - -•-- PARAMEDIC_ STATISTICS � --- ___ Total Responses 551 6'41 7731 60' (types) No Patient/;aid I 41 ni 661 --�17j --- Medical 4 3541GS� J56 33I? Trauma - 17 — 29 339' 4081 -- Auto Accident 13, 13 13U 134 Assault 4, .,61 6 - Jail Call I - -1- 01 2 ---- 43; 471 Transports Base Hosp. Com. T- Trauma Center 34' "71 2i 1 19, 0i 3621 409 262 ------- 232' 7' S' STRAND AND BEACH CALLS Medical only -- 1i l; 241'I Ocean Accident 1-----------01 -----------------�', ------�-j•---------,�-------------I---------- -----�- ----15! ---.. _•__------�, Beach Accident ' 0 Bike v Bike---� Ped o --0; 3j -- - 01 - Bike v Fall off_E ii=e--- I -- 0! J-! - - -- --- - - Skater v Skater _-...---- --- -- -� --- Oi ---- -------- ----�--__ --- ----- -�!--- - ---- _ - - - -6I -- --T- -------- - Skater v Ped Fall off Skates �-- 01 01 01 0� 1�- 4 0 Eike/Skater v Other 0 0� 2 0- � _ -- __-_ _- INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION This No This Month Month IYear toGate_ LastYe.-ar (primary) One Year Ago Ito Date Commercial Assembly 113 4 49 619 41 740 Institutions 010 1 61 Industrial i 01 01 41 111 Apartments (re—Inspections)-r Commercial 661 2 221 4061 521 2681 441 Assembly Institutions 01 51 61 ()i Industrial0 01 0i 0; 0 1 Apartments Fumigations 331 23 9.______—_---287 14 4221 136 Noted: I Resptr tfully SubrnittAd: - a urrell, City I'l na g e , Edward "lsso Arlima Fire Chief January 13, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council January 25, 1993 ACTIVITY REPORT - DECEMBER 1993 Employee Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety 0 Non -safety 0 Employee Turnover Safety 0 Non -safety .0 0 0 3 0 5 1 0 4 0 0 13 1 Current This Month FY to Last FY STATISTICAL SECTION Month Last Year Date To Date Worker Comp Claims: Claims opened 4 8 28 34 Claims closed 10 6 19 34 Total open 71 55 N/A N/A Lost time (Manhours) Safety 290 370 290 1676 Non -safety 379 665 2129 2332 Liability Claims Claims opened 6 3 20 10 Claims closed 7 2 19 21 Total open 24 23 N/A N/A Employee Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety 0 Non -safety 0 Employee Turnover Safety 0 Non -safety .0 0 0 3 0 5 1 0 4 0 0 13 1 General Appropriation Secretary -- The following summary indicates the amount of time spent on each of the assigned functions: December: 170 hours available Word Processing Mail Processing 720 (123 Hrs) 10% (17 Hrs) Avg. 7.2 Hrs/day Avg. 1 Hr/day Hrs/day Word Processing Services by Department Finance : 37% (45 Hrs) City Manager: 3% ( 4 Hrs) Respectfully Submitted Robert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel and Risk Management wp/act Public Works Personnel Directory/Dept Support 18% (37 Hrs) Avg. 1.8 : 32% (39 Hrs) : 28% (35 Hrs) Noted: Stev Burrell City Manager HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DECEMBER, 1993 STAFF REPORTS PREPARED January 18, 1994 Regular Meeting of the January 25, 1994 IUTAL REPURtb PREPARED 9 10 92 97 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once MEETINGS / SEMINARS MEETINGS 1 17 1 25 121 1 9 5 WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP THIS I THIS MONTH I FY LAST FY MONTH LAST FY TO DATE TO DATE 131 447 The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. VA THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL / CITY COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION 1 0 6 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 0 0 0 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERCIAL 0 4 10 14 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 2 2 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ MAP EXTENSION 0 1 2 6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 2 FINAL MAP 0 0 1 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 6 1 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 N/A 2 N/A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 1 0 4 6 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 0 0 2 PARKING PLAN 0 0 3 2 SPECIAL STUDY 5 0 20 13 SUBDIVISION 0 0 1 0 TEXT AMENDMENT 0 2 4 13 TRANSIT 0 0 2 1 VARIANCE 0 0 0 - ZONE ONE CHANGE 0 0 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS 2 1 29 24 IUTAL REPURtb PREPARED 9 10 92 97 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once MEETINGS / SEMINARS MEETINGS 1 17 1 25 121 1 9 5 WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP THIS I THIS MONTH I FY LAST FY MONTH LAST FY TO DATE TO DATE 131 447 The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. VA Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council / lnitiated BX 1. Special study of zoning requirements for small lots / City Council and Planning Commission. 2. Special study and text amendment to add a definition and method of determination for grade for the purpose of measuring building height / Planning Commission. 3. Text amendment regarding historical signs / City Council. 4. Special study of the zoning ordinance and enforcement ordinance regarding parking in front yard setback / City Council. Long, Term Projects Underway 1. Recovering permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Updating General Plan Elements. CONCUR: Michael Sc ubach Planning Director NOTED: — --)4v Stephen R. rr 1 City Manager Respectfully submitted, u-Ying Ti Administrative Aide •4 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1993 DECEMBER 'f. ............................................................. ...................................... ;...................................... ........................................................................... POLICE ............................................................. ....................................... OFFENSES REPORTED ........................................f...................................... ....................................... This Month This Month € Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Murder 0 0: 1 0 Rape 0 0: 3 7 Robbery ......... ..................................................... ...................................... 5 2€ ,...................................... ;.............. ........................ 31 ...................................... 35 Assault 5 6: 91 104 Burglary (Total) 28 32: 390 469 Burglaries (Vehicle) 9 12:: 140 208 Burglaries (Residential) 14 18 216 212 Burglaries (Commercial 5 2 ,...................................... ............................................................. : 34 ...................................... 49 ....................................... Larceny ...................................... 32:::40 601 543 Motor Vehicle Theft ............................................................. . DUI .15...................................3:................................57 26: 74 277 ..............................�68 334 All Other Offenses 212: 245: 3252 3899 Disturbance Calls 171: 199: ............................................................. ...................................... ,...................................... :........................... 2991 ............. ...................................... 3476 ...................................................................................................:......................................y............................................................................ PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 53 113: 964 1 127 Juveniles 2 _4: 58 87 Criminal Citations 57. T T 70: 897 1124 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites f 0 0: 291 40 ............................................................E............................................................................1............................................................................ TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal _ 01 0: Injury 19: 13 120 131 Property Damage Only E 25: ................... ......................................... I...................................... ...................................9 ..............................3221..............................384 CITATIONS i Traffic_ 83: 355: 25551, 3_648 Parking.�...�._....._.�....�.�..�.-��.�...�..- 34.. W 10 .�...���....._ 4291 ..�.�..��._.......� 185 ....... ...................................................... E................................... POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE ... ..........--..............................................; ... Total Calls 1 ---.f ................................... ...........-1 1617: 2060: 24270' 27255 ...................................................................................................1...................................... a...................................... 1 ...................................... i f 1 '..................................... ..................................................................................................p......................................�. 1 ...................................... 1 Pg 1 of 2 .. .i ..................................................................................................;......................................€.................................. This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ One Year Ago € To Date PARKING ENFORCEMENT ........... .................................................. ....................................... Parking citations issued ...................................... ;...................................... 3313: 2363: 61351 ....................................... 29876 W Vehicle impounds/boots 48: W 17: 672 207 PARKING ENFORCEMENT CALLS FOR SERVICE TotalPkg Calls............................................................820................................67`...................................... E ..............................541 ANIMAL CONTROL A/C citations issuedW ............................................. ................ .............. 97 24e..............................167..............................157 ........................:.......... Total o.. Animal Pick ups 31 38 624 ............................................................. ...................................... .e................................€..............................x.............................. 342 of these # returned to owner 6:7 ^^ 111 58 # taken to shelter 15:W 19€ 294 217 ...................................................................................................,......................................;............................................................................ # Injured, taken to Vet 1: 2: 27 12 # Deceased ...................................................................................................:......................................6...................................... 9 10: 201 ...................................... 89 ANIMAL CONTROL CALLS FOR SERVICE Total AC Calls 36 38: 649 334 € '................................................................... ...................................... t 3 Noted: Noted: ... ................................ ....................................... € Respectfully Submitted, ;...................................... ,........... ......... ...;...................................... Steve u rell, City Manager :. Val Straser i ....................................................... Y...................................... :......................................o. ............. . Chief of Police ............................................................€............................................................................'. s 3 Pg2of2 w Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 13, 1994 Regular Meeting of January 25, 1994 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - DECEMBER 1993 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Current This Month FY Last FY Type Month Last FY To Date To Date Sewer Demolition 0 1 2 4 Sewer Lateral 0 0 0 5 Street Excavation 4 5 19 29 Utility Co's only 0 67 0 118 Dumpster/Strand 0 0 3 4 Banner Permits 0 0 2 4 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 92-141 Street Rehabilitation CIP 89-144 Strand Wall & Walkway CIP 92-148 Downtown Trash Enclosures CIP 90-151 Traf. Eng. Program CIP 88-201 Light Conversions & New Installations CIP 92-408 Sanitary Sewer Imp. CIP 92-501 Biltmore Park CIP 92-508 Park Irrigation Improvements CIP 92-513 Develop Expansion of Edith Rodaway Friendship Park CIP 92-515 Develop South School Site CIP 90-616 Earthquake Reinforcement of Clark Building CIP 93-620 New Sound System for the City Council Chambers MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewers/Storm Drains - Street Lighting - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service Parks Division/Medians: Maintained medians city-wide. Cleaned up oil spill in the street. Trimmed trees city-wide for safety clearance. Replanted Hermosa Avenue at 190th. Repaired signs city-wide. Repainted/refurbished basketball courts at Moondust Park. Assisted in Police Department remodel. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: City-wide sweeper route. Began 26th Street/Hermosa Avenue planter removal. City-wide asphalt patching. Assisted in Police Department remodel. Finish concrete projects on Gould Avenue. Continued city yard clean up. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Rodded sewers city-wide. Assisted with Police Department remodel. Opened beach storm drains. Street Lighting: Completed Gould Avenue project. Repaired street lights and traffic signal city-wide. Repaired tube system at City Hall. Assisted in Police Department remodel. Traffic Safety Division: Replaced/repaired street signs city-wide. Painted T's & L's on Manhattan Avenue. Painted legends on bike -path. Building Maintenance Division: On-going janitorial service. Repaired the city yard roof. Repaired windows at various buildings. Painted city yard offices. Worked on Police Department restrooms. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Graffiti Removal: FY 92-93 FY 93-94 JULY 1992 33.50 Hrs.(Revised) JULY 1993 36.50(Revised) AUGUST 1992 28.50 Hrs. AUGUST 1993 58.50 Hrs. SEPTEMBER 1992 39.50 Hrs. SEPTEMBER 1993 19.50 Hrs. OCTOBER 1992 11.00 Hrs. OCTOBER 1993 23.50 Hrs. NOVEMBER 1992 37.00 Hrs. NOVEMBER 1993 17.00 Hrs. DECEMBER 1992 17.50 Hrs. DECEMBER 1993 24.00 Hrs. JANUARY 1993 17.00 Hrs. FEBRUARY 1993 24.00 Hrs. MARCH 1993 66.00 Hrs. APRIL 1993 25.50 Hrs. MAY 1993 54.50 Hrs. JUNE 1993 51.50 Hrs. YTD TOTAL ft 405.50 Hrs. Respectfully submitted, Amy Amirani Director of Public Works mon2/pwadmin YTD TOTAL 179.00 Hrs. Noted: :�Qn Stephe" rrell City ager DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES CITY OF HERM_OSA -------------------- BEACH MONTH OF DECEMBER, --------------- 199.3 AMOUNT OF SERVICE YEAR TO LAST YEAR SERVICE PROVIDED THIS MONTH DATE TO DATE SERVICE REQUEST 0 0 0 FIELD HOURS* 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 DOG IMPOUNDED 2 32 63 CAT IMPOUNDED 4 45 73 OTHER IMPOUNDED S 63 57 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 PRIVATE VETERINARIAN CARE 0 0 0 OBSERVATION 0 2 1 DEAD ANIMAL 4 34 32 HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 0 COURT APPEARANCES (hours) 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 ANIMALS PLACED IN NEW HOMES 2 23 39 ANIMALS RETURNED TO OWNERS 1 13 16°-�- LICENSED SOLD 0 0 0 DOG LICENSE CANVASSING 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 *Includes humane education hours Many agencies haue a role in prouid- ingyou+rwater. Water Replen+ish � � ent District is tfiebasin- wideagency that a+nages ou+r water quality and water supply on a regional level. The District carries out co � � ple�x tech+nidal activities and projects. Mare ani+ � + ed at a goal that is clear and si � � ple: guarantee a+n ample supply o fcleanground- wa+te-r for the 3.5 mi�Ulion people — a'nd the parks, busines*ses and indus- tries — o f sou+them Los Ange--les County. An Ample Supply of Groundwater For 3.5 Million People Here are a few of the Water Replenishment Water Rcplenishme►itDistrict purchases and stores water underground to use when District programs that protect the basins from needed. The District is so success frrl that after five years of the worst drought in recent outside threats. c3 California history, the water level in the basins actually increased. Seawater Barriers. In coastal areas, closely Traditional Water Supply Sources. The District offers incentives that encour- spaced wells inject fresh water into the ground. age water agencies to purchase and use imported water in the winter when it is This action forms an effective barrier against available and cheap. This saves the less expensive groundwater for use in the sea water which decades ago began to intrude summer when demand peaks. into the groundwater basins. Reclaimed Water. Water Replenishment District is the largest regulated user of Contamination From Outside. Pollutants recycled wastewater in the State. At $11 an acre foot (the amount of water two from the San Gabriel Basin, north of our �o households use in a year), it is far less expensive than imported water which costs '�i+Ii�E1�; il�4li+y.� iI ri .l service area, threaten to migrate southward. o a l+. $2S0 to $400 an acre foot. Recycled wastewater is safe and reliable making southern Water Replenishment District and 14 citiesMAM ° Los Angeles County more self sufficient. formed a coalition which is working to contain the pollutants. Landfills, Leaking Tanks, Pesticides. �^ ' The District is searching out every abandoned landfill, leakingtank and hazardous waste site C \` Glu to reduce its danger to the groundwater. Where possible, responsible parties will be CENTRAL GROUN-DWATER BASIN made to clean up their contaminants.0. —WRD Alamitos WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT Barrier OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA x m.project _._.. West Coa st~BasnT. Ili' �...�: ,'� r .:. + 'I r.." I. I;I 'i' �'1:. ., ,:.. ..ui�,U it iI+II •I;;rl' ,WES.T,IGOAST GRO::UN,D.WATERI BASIN l ) l .:: .I. .::::.:, .., �. _ .) ., i... v ,:,.:., (.lI ti-. I �..I l 4I I6, (I :..i ,:i li . 4„_ (. i.V n.l :.i) :, I) III AGI L...�Li::l ,:,.I�L.IIIILt.�:IIVB.G _ _.,,_ �.��tl�hu., i (ila.�j+lt,l l^, ) : ilBarrier Pro ect. I {a��l,,,,l,l ,,,m ��l � l il,lll,lil �► ' ' ply ,l,,l , l , ��, l- • � Ill,, �, ,�,� , !, � +5�1; - --- �- 1 • �'1 C41C� \`Dominguez'. . �•• GAWBarrier•#ASSURE QUALITY OF THE BASINS ; I IIAI`i ��il 1 ii.,:;I• ,.d�ldh�lli'�41 'ISI il���i l Lill I�l�illli'IIEI;iiISP' l -:y iq 1�`'�«j�l�+II'G .I �,6: San Pedro Bay • +I��II������l+������,,�hl„,� ii�fl il�ll���l�l�il ��:�4�', �l a!li�l���Mghl'IN o The District has an intensive water quality Santa Monica Bay �. Q monitoring prograrn thatgathers health and quality information from the basin and publishes the results of thousands of water quality tests in the Annual CLEAN-UP THE BASINS 01'h Report on the Results o Water Quality Monitoring. p p ! ty g. A goal of the district is a contamination- free Basin. Here are a few clean-up programs °I `” Research. The District conducts health that remove contaminants from the water. research into quality issues to assure the safety Rebate Program and Wellhead Treatment Program. Industrial solvents called and health of residents. Volatile Organic Compounds years ago were carelessly dumped onto the ground, Monitoring Wells. The district has in place affecting the water. Water Replenishment District offers rebates, financing, technical monitoring wells to gather water samples for help, and even entire facilities, to help clean up our basins. testing. These are in addition to the thousands Desalting Demonstration Project. The District is participating in a desalting of tests done by other basin water suppliers. demonstration, and is exploring other innovative techniques to clean up saltwater Together, this adds up to an invaluable water that entered the basin decades ago, contaminating coastal groundwater. quality data resource. This is just one part of WRD's cfflMFehensive Clean NOW Program designed to eventually raid the Basin of comtainants and protect our under- ground treasure for future generatiMill n[n 23W1A129 @ V9912 29OSS3V00KSio n003 95 Water Quality Water Supply Water Institutions and more .. . WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 12621 EAST 166TH STREET CERRIT05, CA 9U7U1 (t31U) 93I_5521 Wellhead Treatment - Cleaning Up the Groundwater Water Replenishment District's ultimate goal is contamination free groundwater. One of the most difficult clean-up obstacles is a class of industrial solvents called Volatile ( j , �,� Organic Compounds (VOC s)�4'� �. which are harmful even in tiny concentrations. y " u''ti I Because clean-up of VOC's is wW L rl too expensive for many local cities and water agencies, WRD offers a Wellhead Treatment Program which provides them` — with financial assistance and even entire treat- p ment facilities (costing up to $500,000 each). This $8 million program is designed to clean up 19 key wells between now and 1998. WRD treatment plants under construction will be capable of cleaning as much as a billion gallons of water each year. Reaching Out to the Community Southern California is supported by one of the largest, most complex water systems in the world. Because customers are con- cerned and interested, Water Replenish- ment District is redoubling its efforts to answer your questions about water. To learn more: look for our new water information displays to be installed in local libraries; call for a speaker for your organization; watch for upcoming issues of Ground Water, or call the District for more information. Fill Out and Mai'I the Enclosed host Card. Stay informed about what is being done to assure you of an abundant, healthful supply of water. Future issues of this newsletter will be sent to you at no charge. WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRIC OFT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA oaPOaNaVooa aDOMV a eoVaa L•3L�30NJG36G o COMM 6C30NJGJD 09a4QG3 DIRECTORS Dan Glasgow MEW Dr. Kenneth M.Ord�una VICE I R� Robert Goldsworthy M=MW Clarence Wong TMOsuM Aubert Robles D PR�EC"I"O R GENERAL MANAGER John W. Norman a PUMILM6 V09 w8UR 3 Iar�Paaao�a�QaV DOE3VL306V Preserving the Treasure Beneath Your Feet About half of the water used by 3.5 million people in the 43 cities of southern Los Angeles County is stored underground. It is found in natural formations called aquifers, made of F soil, sand and gravel saturated with water. ` Series of aquifers linked together form the two great groundwater basins — the Central Groundwater Basin and the West Coast Groundwater Basin — that supply much of the water in our area. Many challenges threaten the quality and quantity of this precious resource: n :. = Contamination from inside and outside the basin Q•• • = Tough and costly water quality *UN!fb9P KM&Q QFJ&9 Maw, standards gman�6... O(Al -,,.-4 ft n3 agg L°.13h 5M l°A1 ° ° D Sea water intrusion WERW W@ ° . ° = Limited water supply °��..° 9,,�9 OR EM @.ry�., �ryvy-,,�,,,,,, 99UMV IIVI°AAN l�.UTA°AT wag 99 - 'Water Replenishment I District o f Southem California — your groundwa- ter manager — is meeting these challenges while protecting and improving the ground- water for you and your children. Future editions of Ground Water will answer many of the questions you have about your water supply. This first edition gives an overview of how the district assures that you have an ample supply of healthful water. Part of WRQ's Etfort to Ensure Groundv��a ter QUOMY ... In the past, improper disposal practices of industrial solvents allowed volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to seep into the groundwater. As a result, some wells in the Water Replenishment District (WRD) were affected and taken out of drinking water production. Stricter regulations have greatly reduced the source of this contamination, but we are left with the problem of removing the existing contamination from the groundwater. WRD has established a Wellhead Treatment Program to address this issue. The first WRD wellhead treatment facility began operation in 1991. 111 0frre3�trrs�r?Tnt iFbro�•�rh?� The program is designed to help groundwater pumpers remove VOCs— allowing an affected well to meet public drinking water standards set by regulatory agencies. It encourages pumpers to re -open wells taken outof domesticuse becauseof contamination. This increases groundwater pumping capacity and reduces dependence on scarce and expensive imported water supplies. In addition, the removal of VOCs from the groundwater supply helps prevent the contaminants from spreading to other areas. .1,LJL5 Thi F"ro��rrlirYi `fJurM WRD's Wellhead Treatment Program works in two ways: 1) The District will provide financing to a pumper for necessary treatment equipment. This funding comes from the Clean Water Fund, or... 2) The District will buy the necessary wellhead treatment equipment and the pumper pays for operation and maintenance costs. As part of the District's Clean Water Programs, the Wellhead Treatment Program encourages the clean-up of our groundwater supply. By cleaning up our groundwater supply of Southern Los Angeles County, we move one step closer to reaching the goal of ensuring groundwater quality through effective and conscientious groundwater management. What Are The Advantages Of The Program? Removing and eliminating the spread of contaminants reduces the risk of further contamination. -'� Increasing groundwater pumping capacity allows more water to be pumped locally. �-' Providing low interest loans and varying repayment terms minimizes net treatment costs to the pumper. `�7 Furnishing the necessary treatment equipment eliminates the need for pumpers to provide the capital costs. Reducing the dependence on scarce and expensive imported water allows Southern California to become water independent. Moving the treatment equipment to other locations as needed makes the program cost effective. How Docs This Program eIate To The V©C Remo ai Program? Water processed in the Wellhead Treatment Program may also qualify for WRD's volatile organic compound (VOC) Removal Rebate Program. The program is designed to encourage the removal of VOCs from currently operational wells to improve water quality. By encouraging the pumping of wells containing VOCs, the contaminants are removed from the basins thereby eliminating the threat of further spreading. How Do I Find Out More informaUon About The Program? For more information on this program or any of the Clean Water Programs, contact the Water Replenishment District. WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 12621 E. 166th Street Cerritos, California 90701 (310) 921-5521 State health authorities. Another source of replenishment water is storm water runoff. Runoff Iis diverted from the adjacent Rio Hondo and San Gabriel Rivers into the spreading grounds. Upstream dams capture additional runoff and snow melt for later spreading. Halting Sea Water l9trusi®n [Dry wells were not the only symptom of the drastic decline of the water table levels in the late 1950's. In the West Coast Groundwater Basin, groundwater levels dropped below sea level allowing salt water to seep into the basin. This caused salt water contamination in wells and a significant loss of groundwater storage capacity. FINIOJECTN`WELrL- _ 1r R��J 1 AQUIFER f— NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD FAULT WEST COAST BASIN CENTRAL BASIN To deter the flow of saline water into the groundwater basins, three sea water intrusion barriers were constructed. Each barrier consists of a line of closely -spaced injection wells. Water is injected through these wells to form a barrier of fresh water between the ocean and the groundwater basin. Barrier water is also the major source of replenish- ment for the West Coast Groundwater Basin. Groundwater Quality WRD is dedicated to the protection and enhancement of ground- water quality in the Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins. Area groundwater is threatened by Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) L� I'a contamination from the San Gabriel Valley through the Whittier Narrows, as well as from isolated areas of existing local contamination. In addition, entrapped saline water endangers theWest Coast basin groundwater. WRD has established a series of Clean Water Programs to safeguard groundwater quality. These programs foster removal of contaminants, and prevent pollution to the groundwater. The District also conducts extensive water quality monitoring programs., Environmental Consciousness U\ ecycled water, like the recycled paper in this brochure, is environ mentally friendly. WRD is currently the largest regulated user of re cycled water in California. By maximizing the use of recycled water and storm water runoff, the District conserves local Southern California resources otherwise lost to the ocean. This also reduces our need for water imported from the Colorado and Sacramento Rivers, decreasing the environmental impact on these ecologically sensitive river systems. Looking t® the Future �n our semi -arid region of rapidly increasing population, Southern California's prosperity depends on reliable water supplies. The Water, Replenishment District is actively developing local water resources to replace scarce and costly imported water. Our goal is to drought - proof the Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins and provide a safe, clean and reliable supply of groundwater now and for future generations. 1 WIC® STATIMCS , District formation: December 9, 1959 Service region: Central and WestCoast Groundwater Basins in Southern Los Angeles County Service area: 420 square miles Population in service area: 3.5 million Cities served: 43 Average annual groundwater demand in service area: 250,000 acre feet Average annual recycled water use: 50,000 acre feet _ ,r Average annual storm water use: 40,000 acre feet (An acre=foot of water is the amount of water used by two -typical households in a year.) Groundwater Repenushu ent Uhe Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins are artificially replen- ished by spreading and injecting replacement water. These replenish- ment operations are a joint effort of WRD and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. Natural underground flow of groundwater from adjacent basins supplements artificial replenishment. Replenishment by spreading is accomplished by diverting water into large holding ponds at the Rio Hondo and the San Gabriel River Spread- ing Grounds located in Montebello and Pico Rivera. This water seeps down into the ground- water aquifers and replenishes the Central Groundwater Basin. A portion of this water also crosses the New- port -Inglewood fault and partially replenishes the West Coast Ground- water Basin. Three sources of water are utilized for replen- 10 Santa Monica Freeway 60 Los Angeles Pomona Freeway Montebello 605 to San Gabriel Harbor Freeway River Freeway scum Ba[e Hawtnoma Downey 5 0 71C nta na Long Beach Freeway Freeway 4 Cerrito. O 405 gt San Diego Freeway Artesia Freeway v o Ceraen ""ror.enoa a 0 O Wlmington 0 OO Long Beach 0 A Palos Verdes 0O OOOOQ ishment at the spreading grounds. WRD purchases water originating in Northern California and the Colorado River from the Metropolitan Water District. Highly treated recycled water, purchased from the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, is also used for spreading. To assure the highest standards of public health, the quality of this recycled water is closely monitored by !Matsu• Replenishment, ent, District of Southern California he Water Replenishment District of Southern California (WRD) provides groundwater for 3.5 million residents in 43 cities of southern Los Angeles County. Prior to the formation of the District in' 1959, over -pumping caused many water wells to go dry and sea water intrusion to contaminate coastal'groundwater. WRD protects the basins through- groundwater_ replenishment, deterrence of sea water intrusion, and groundwater contamination prevention and clean-up programs. WRD operations are ,financed through assessments on groundwater pumped from the District service area - the Central and West Coast Groundwater Basins. Groundwater Ompotance (Groundwater is'an important source of water in southern Los Angeles County, providing approximately'40% of the total demand. Ground- water reserves also provide an emergency supply of water during droughts -and natural disasters that disrupt normal water deliveries. Groundwater is formed as surface water seeps down through the ground into aquifers. These aquifers are natural underground forma- tions, such -as sand and gravel, whichserveas subterranean water reservoirs. A series of aquifers in a specific area comprise a basin. Water is pumped from groundwater basins through wells drilled into the aquifers. CMES SERVED BY WRID Artesia Long Beach Bell f Los Angeles Bell Gardens Lynwood - Bellflower Manhattan Beach Carson Maywood Cerritos Montebello City of Commerce Monterey Park Compton Norwalk Cudahy Palos Verdes Estates Downey Paramount EI Segundo Pico Rivera Gardena Rancho Palos Verdes Hawaiian Gardens Redondo Beach Hawthorne Rolling Hills Hermosa Beach"- Rolling Hills Estates Huntington Park - Santa Fe Springs Inglewood Signal Hill La Habra Heights South Gate La Mirada Torrance` , Lakewood Vernon Lawndale Whittier Lomita P' df you would like to learn more about the Water Replenishment District of Southern California, printed On please call (310) 921-5521. Recycled Paper. is Wafer Replenishment District of Southern California WRD Board of Directors Dr. Kenneth Orduna, Vice President • First Division Robert Goldsworthy, Secretary • Second Division Dan Glasgow, President • Third Division Clarence Wong, Treasurer • Fourth Division Albert Robles, Director • Fifth Division General Manager John Norman 12621 E. 166th Street o Cerritos, CA 90,701 o (310) 921-5521 -_o Managing Groundwater For Today and the Future i Santa/;%Monica Venice Marina eyerly Hills Monterey WILSHIRE BLVD. 4y �SP'\0N VALLEYA IWL�°II�� YpEE� N�'1°` rlr_ o Park SAN BEp i ^\nc WF\,r1 r1\1^ o'"': > \\P IIIIIQIIII//gRIR///I/p .D m.`�R 0 'nOrrOr/y Vr: 1AIVA= e - cRRvfr hIP\ / VENICE BLVD. LOS AUI� RfSFRVOr� /-'�//y- OICOK *ROLpBs55K / H Ihl rllu/il i ( J SANTA MONICA Angeles W HEEWgH TT -ER POM P `\ BIW 'N 71 t\e oR Culver/////%o'//gym -City > Vernon i \' OF VERNON 3.01, A. AVE. E O S �", 3.'� a Huntington f p N f� •,p1iF 4 fryffWq s -'3.r F �'�J 3 C. Pork Bf H �"IU4 No '%m 1a MANCHESTER m ••• • Inglewood BLVD. South FR Gate IES r.:..•.rP.•a TONE o FIRST DIVISION Dao �o m T IMPERIAL HIGHWAY 9T. clrr Lynwoo OF LOS ANGELES W Hawthorne n "x°""°° BLVD.FOURTH DIVISION El Segundo 3 \ R RA S it AVE. Compton (� O � J N.RINL AVE. Manhattan Beach Gardena cin \p\Ilry11111114/Illlllpll,nr, N � PRTE9IA 0 REO -.`:, 1QN00 OO BEACH FREEWAY 41 BEACH Hermosa Beoch\ EGD a FREEWPY SECOND DIVISION 141 W V L Redondo Beach T FRANCE BLVD. °r Carson e Torrance CARSON ST, SEPULVEDA o 1AIRm111�W�i/► °4 f/R/ 3 C %1"ll�d OF Palos Verdes Estat s5� �„ ° u Lomita of WE c cTr L09 Y -'�- PACIi1C -/IIIb BOR Wilmington ' w HLOB A.1P R O 04 P A L O S V E RRcseRFArR E S ly Ga t ' SEP Q pAL S VERDES h E T RI E a j San °s Pedro SOUTH rw 73 A P 3 'Y 4 FR West Covina �/ "w�4rA`WN �IPAUpP- p>v ol" r �.. Lo Puente � 00 QN4 Commerce WMRTIEF a0\�y \qP\I��q\\S\� /O L �, ry ir/1Inlll/iN, �..�-BLVD. Montebello 0 - r q� PO NOryA Q ti F ORR N :°' V --%//� CANYON pD^ Il llrl/ FREE*' EEW'I SLA SON �Po u 'ry�i \\\lNP°\ 1111111 /�ll�%//Illllllllll Pwe h CITY OF ico CITY OF COMMERCE ey Rivera BELL GPROEr, 4H ° Whittler Bell - E Gardens 10 rf< e a N \' (4 II I11R 1 Santa Fe 4N 0 iIO°III"IIVIlld14\i 111IIIIIW IPIIIrAY\rll'E'N\I`/4'\IIID,Ylllll\\\11110 Springs ORANGE Mi Fr co. Ro. CO. Downey B(� A FIFTH DI -IS 0 N NOTES o HORWPLK 9 1. BASED ON RESOLUTION NA.91-434 OF orH v' BOARD OF DIRECTORS RELOCATING BOUNDARY LINES OF DISTRICT DIVISIONS ly IMPERIAL HIGHWAY a ON DECEMBER 19,1991. "NEH 2. THE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT 0 Norwalk s La Mirada OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WAS FORMERLY KNOWN AS CENTRAL AND WEST BASIN :GRANS AVE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT. a qEf Paramount e - m Cerritos rJ PA AMD°NT I Bellflower i'J District DND GEACM 4RrE IA FREE- ya DitlCe ARTESIA BLVD. Artesia 11 OZ m - Lakewood o L BLVD. O CITYLAKEWOoo w U ° Ou CARSON � J sr. G HIRD DIV I S IONb LEGEND 000 _ BOUNDARY OF WATER REPLENISHMENT C •°i DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. SLJ_ ]tea AN / U� BOUNDARY OF DIRECTORS DIVISIONS.ISEE NOTE No.0 ��� 1N R , ��Yl1✓ WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT Long each OF "''•'` �' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA v Q F�L4NDINV �� a � ��%x1111111111\\ $GDI 600 LOCATION OF DIRECTORS DIVISIONS \ PEDRp BAY 5 BOOKMAN—EDMONSTON ENGINEERING, INC. GLENDALE , CALIFORNIA APRIL 1992 SCALE OF MILES D 2 3