Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/22/97
AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 22, 1997 - Council Chambers, City Hall 6:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Co PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- CITIZEN TIZEN COMMENTS 4DJOURNMENT 50 Meeting with L. A. County Supervisor Don Knabe "The same fence that shuts others out shuts you in." - Bill Copeland AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 22, 1997 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session — Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK J. R. Reviczky Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Sam Y. Edgerton John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Robert Benz Stephen R. Burrell John Bowler CITY ATTORNEY Julie Oakes Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Stephen Sammarco regarding the Hermosa Beach Yellow Bike Program. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on July 1, 1997; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on July 8, 1997. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the June 1997 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution setting the 1997-98 appropriations limit. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 7, 1997. 2 (1) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Santa Monica Bay Competitive Grant Program for the Valley Park Detention'Basin and Eco -System Project. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 16, 1997. (g) Recommendation to authorize additional expenditure from Park Improvement Funds CIP 97-506 for Clark Building Seismic Retrofit Project in an amount of $3,175.. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 14, 1997. (h) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 1997. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION BY THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A SIDEYARD VARIANCE OF 2.2' RATHER THAN THE REOUIRED 3 FEET AND THE DETERMINATION ESTABLISHING'1'HE PROJECT BASE ELEVATION FOR MEASURING HEIGHT AT TI E NEAREST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT (FLOW LINE OF THE STREET) AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 14, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission decisions to grant the south side yard variance and approve by minute order the use the nearest public improvement as the basis for measuring building height. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD "MASSAGE THERAPY" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE INTHE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To amend the Zoning Ordinance to define and add "Massage Therapy Business" to a conditionally 3 permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 zones and add special licensing provisions and minimum requirements for a massage therapy business to the Municipal Code. 6. TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHANGE ZONING VIOLATIONS FROM MISDEMEANORS TO INFRACTIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS. RECOMMENDATION: Continue to meeting of September 9, 1997. 7. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AND SELF CER'I'1H'ICATION RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 16, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution certifying compliance with Congestion Management Program. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. STATUS REPORT — DOWNTOWN REINVESTMENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 2, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. STATUS OF TUI: DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: Consider whether the Downtown Enhancement Commission has accomplished its primary objectives. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. MEMORANDUM FROM CITY MANAGER REGARDING EXPANSION OF LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution and authorize Mayor to execute letter outlining the City's concerns about the proposed expansion of the airport. 4 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT OF ABC ACTIONS IN HERMOSA BEACH. Copy of recent ABC action dated July 16, 1997. 12. O'1'HLR MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to stafffor a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Councilmember Benz to direct staff to develop a fully operational reserve Firefighter Program including paid call positions. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items. within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held: a. June 24, 1997; and, b. July 8, 1997. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Association of Volleyball Professionals v. California Coastal Commission Case Number: BS045799 5 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 22, 1997 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session — Immediately following Regular Session CALL TO ORDER: 7:18pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mr. Diaz ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT ANNOUNCEMENTS: 90th Birthday Party, July 26, 1997. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO CINDY WAGNER FOR BEING NAMED THE 1997 NATIONAL BIG SISTER OF '111E YEAR AWARD. INTRODUCTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM LORETO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Stephen Sammarco regarding the Hermosa Beach Yellow Bike Program. JO/JB MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on July 1, 1997; and, 2)Minutes of the Regular meeting held on July 8, 1997. PULLED BY JR. CITY CLERK NOTED THAT 7/1/97 MINUTES WILL BE AMENDED TO NOTE MR. LISSNER'S LETTER. JR/JB MOTION TO APPROVE MINUTES. VOTE: 5-0 (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the June 1997 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution setting the 1997-98 appropriations limit. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 7, 1997. (f) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Santa Monica Bay Competitive Grant Program for the Valley Park Detention Basin and Eco -System Project. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 16, 1997. (g) Recommendation to authorize additional expenditure from Park Improvement Funds CIP 97-506 for Clark Building Seismic Retrofit Project in an amount of $3,175.. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 14, 1997. (h) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 1997. JB/JO MOTION FOR BALANCE. VOTE: 5-0 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM FHL CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION BY THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A SIDEYARD VARIANCE OF 2.2' RATHER THAN THE REOUIRED 3 FEET AND THE DETERMINATION ESTABLISHING THE PROJECT BASE ELEVATION FOR MEASURING HEIGHT AT TILE NEAREST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT (FLOW LINE OF THE STREET) AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 14, 1997. RB/SE MOTION TO APPROVE BY MINUTE ORDER THE USE OF 'TILE NEAREST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AS TRE BASIS FOR MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT. VOTE: 4-1 (JR - NO) JO/SE MOTION TO DENY VARIANCE ON NORTH PROPERTY LINE. VOTE: 5-0 SERB MOTION TO SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS TO GRANT THE SOUTH SIDE YARD VARIANCE AND DIRECT STAFF TO BRING BACK A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE FINDINGS AT THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. VOTE: 3-2 (JO/JR-NO) 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD "MASSAGE THERAPY" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997, JR/SE MOTION TO AMEND MOTION TO RENEW MEDICAL CER'TIFICATE ANNUALLY (INCLUDING TECHNICIANS) AND AMEND SECTION 5.74.060(A) TO STATE THAT LIGHTING BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIE BUILDING CODE. VOTE: 3-2 (RB/JB-NO) RB/JB MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DEFINE AND ADD "MASSAGE 'THERAPY BUSINESS" TO A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES AND ADD SPECIAL LICENSING PROVISIONS (AND ADD A PROVISION TO RENEW MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ANNUALLY, INCLUDING TECHNICIANS, AND AMEND SECTION 5.74.060(A) TO STATE THAT LIGHTING BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING CODE) AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND WAIVE FULL READING. VOTE: 5-0 6. TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHANGE ZONING VIOLATIONS FROM MISDEMEANORS TO INFRACTIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS. JB/JO MOTION TO CONTINUE TO MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1997. VOTE: 5-0 7. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AND SELF CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 16, 1997. SE/JO MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. VOTE: 5-0 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. STATUS REPORT — DOWNTOWN REINVESTMENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 2, 1997. JB/JO MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 9. STATUS OF THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMIVIISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997. SERB MOTION TO DISBAND THE D.E.C. AND AGENDIZE THE ISSUE OF FORMATION OF A P.C.H. ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION. VOTE: 5-0 4 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. MEMORANDUM FROM CITY MANAGER REGARDING EXPANSION OF LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. JB/JO MOTION TO AMEND TO INCLUDE OBJECTION TO CHANGES IN THE CEILING, ADOPT RESOLUTION AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO EXECUTE LETTER OUTLINING THE CITY'S CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE AIRPORT. VOTE: 5-0 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT OF ABC ACTIONS IN HERMOSA BEACH. Copy of recent ABC action dated July 16, 1997. RB/SE MOTION FOR COUNCIL TO CONFIRM LETTER TO GOVERNOR WILSON. VOTE: 4-0 (JB -ABSTAIN) 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this' item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Councilmember Benz to direct staff to develop a fully operational reserve Firefighter Program including paid call positions. ITEM WITHDRAWN. C11 IGEN COMMENTS Jim Curnut: Wants crosswalks painted at 16th & Manhattan Ave., Ardmore & Pier Ave., 22nd Street & Hermosa Ave.. Also stated need for parking markings to be repainted in areas above Hermosa Avenue.. 5 ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: RB/SE MOTION TO ADD STULL V. BANK OF AMERICA TO CLOSED SESSION. VOTE: 5-0 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held: a. b. June 24, 1997; and, July 8, 1997. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Association of Volleyball Professionals v. California Coastal Commission Case Number: BSO45799 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT TO 8/12/97, 6:OOPM TO INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 22, 1997, at the hour of 7: 0,, P.M. (pale nos. OK) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky Absent: None • MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS: Ca' D) st6f6k, — 314- 'Lte/t 411/14 YeeY>-- 1‘)6d -M A -o& PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) .ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) . Members of the Public wishing to request removal of an item from the consent calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens may also speak: (1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; (2) during Public Hearings; (3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, (4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: lJ "a-- -'ist/9av' e44c ? 10!5 „Al @..cso-ges.L", 1,0-ata s tvrsdec 40, rCity�Co nen:Minute • 70: r 07-;2-9 , Page 9487 r'+/ At 7: P.M.. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS: (c) GITZ(.4 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: 1. Letter from Stephen Sammarco regarding the Hermosa Beach Yellow Bike Program. REC MMENDATION: Receive and file. AIL 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent, roll call, vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these 'items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the consent calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comments permitted at that time. Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (h), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (a). (requested by Jim Lissner in his supplemental letter noted in item 1[a]), Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 0 i i No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on July 1, 1997. Supplemental letter from Jim Lisner, 2715 El Oeste Drive, received July 22, 1997; and, City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9488 2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on July 8, 1997. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Deputy City Clerk Naoma Valdes said thatthe minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 1, 1997, would be clerically amended to note the supplemental letter from Mr. Lissner. /tY6 � J Action: To approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 1, 1997, as amended to note the supplemental letter from Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Drive received July 1, 1997, and to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 8, 1997, as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS.. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE JUNE 1997 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the June, 1997 Financial Reports as presented. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution setting the 1997-98 appropriations limit. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 7, 1997. City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9489 gq-s3 16 _es& Action:. To ,approve Vae s aff recommendation to adopt Resolution N . 97-58 titled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE �I OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADOPTIN THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FI L AR 1997-98.", which sets the. appropriations limit for the City of Hermosa Beach for fiscal year.1997-98 as $14,306,861. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SANTA MONICA BAY COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE VALLEY PARK DETENTION BASIN AND ECO -SYSTEM PROJECT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 16, 1997. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To Resolution CITY COUNCI APPROVING T ANGELES COU BAY COMPETIT pprove the s•aff recommendation to adopt 97-58 (p, e.'itled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE ITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPLICAT FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS Y DEP •`ENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SANTA MONICA RANT PROGRAM FOR THE VALLEY PARK DETENTION BASIN ECO -SYSTEM PROJECT. Motion , second . The . motion unanimous vote. carried by a (g) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURE;;FROM PARK IMPROVEMENT FUNDS CIP 97-506 FOR. CLARK BUILDING SEISMIC RETROFIT PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT OF $3,175.: Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 14, 1997. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize additional expenditure from Park Improvement Fund CIP 97- 506 for Clark Building. Seismic Retrofit Project in an amount of $3,175 to cover the additional expense of removing asbestos heating duct wrap and other items of work added to the original contract to complete the job, such as removal of the old heaters, installation of new heaters, and insulation of the ceiling for more energy efficiency. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION --MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 15, 1997.: City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9490 o 3A4- f -9 -74/& - mild r 5 IS AAA 15 Q om a(gb/mkrt _ m= ego A)-(fwel 6gA( s'Fs& op* Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 1997. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES: None AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky NOES: None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1( ), ( ), ( ), and ( ) were heard at this are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS 741-0 time but consent 4. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION BY THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A SIDEYARD VARIANCE OF 2.2' RATHER THAN THE'REOUIRED 3 FEET AND THE DETERMINATION ESTABLISHING THE PROJECT BASE ELEVATION FOR MEASURING HEIGHT AT THE NEAREST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT (FLOW LINE OF THE STREET) AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Developme t Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 14, 1997. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. ss¢ee p GI -u4 - RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission decisions to grant the south side yard variance and approve by minute order the use the nearest public improvement as the basis for measuring building height. City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9491 seiRT) e The public hearing opened at 7: P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: lic hearing closed at 7: P.M. -rcA4 !)(2;AIA4‘A'e gb15- woc2vdo Action: To deny the appeal, uphold the decision of the Planning Commission, approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 97-58 , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ;5 CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING '� (,v COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FROM THE SOUTH SIDE YARD REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW A 2.2 -FOOT SIDE YARD TO REMAIN FOR A GREATER THAN 100 PERCENT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 24, TRACT 1031.", and to sustain the Planning Commission decision to use the nearest public improvement (flow line of the street) as the basis t/7(0-A4/'for measuring building height. I �� =�®'yt 7 tE 4 0 0 iS 4444W 0 ..,,),ax,i,AA., kl..., /1- 0F s-/0 K b's 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD SSAGE THERAPAS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND 3 ZONES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. cu4J_-sjo PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To amend the Zoning Ordinance to define and add "Massage Therapy Business" to a conditionally permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 zones and add special licensing provisions and minimum requirements for a massage therapy business to the Municipal Code. The public hearing opened at /0: (14 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9492 - SDS` / v �c _50-6 L2.5-- - I5o . _ exa--4-- p -Ls 3/a closed at Ck _�'• ► ,', urn The public hearin 0: 1O P.M. art/nc� - Azdfitzt-a,,Ace66 ction: To approve the Planning Commission ���s r commendation to waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 97-11 , entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE �Q 3bCITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.04 V�•J n----- OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE DEALING WITH /71,0 Ct/jV LICENSING FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS, AND .ADDING CHAPTER 5.74 TO REGULATE MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESSES." Motion , second AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky NOES: None Final Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 97-11 , entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE COMMERCIAL LAND USE REGULATIONS TO ADD "MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES." Motion , second AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky NOES: None 6. TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHANGE ZONING VIOLATIONS FROM MISDEMEANORS TO INFRACTIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS. RECOMMENDATION: Continue to meeting of September 9, 1997. Action: To continue this item to the meeting September 9, 1997. Motion U� fs , second 3B unanimous vote. /11.0 friCP City Council Minutes The motion carried by -22-97 Page 9493 7. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AND SELF CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 16, 1997. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution certifying compliance with Congestion Management Program. The public hearing opened at "I: P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: AkP ' The public hearing closed at 7: P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 97-58 , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT,. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089." Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ` 10 o MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. STATUS REPORT - DOWNTOWN REINVESTMENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 2, 1997. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. J� 6/ RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Public participation opened at : P.M. City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9494 Public participation closed at : P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the report on Downtown reinvestment that showed private investment at 33.8 million dollars, public investment at 8.3 million dollars, and a projected total annual revenue addition of $681,358. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. STATUS OF THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. (s" SE RECOMMENDA•ION: Consider whether the Downtown Enhancement. Commission has accomplished its primary objectives. Public participation opened at /):/�P. 4-7C-e-ti Public participation closed at/0 Action: To Motion , second unanimous vote. .d-e44A-ap PCW P.M. The motion carried by a 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS CITY MANAGER City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9495 -11e/vite. cJ <%t 43 - c� 0.te 44-e) A5-f-414,rite_ ISo-I-(L- i5 PotkA___ cu-k44- • a. MEMORANDUM FROM CITY MANAGER REGARDING EXPANSION OF LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution and authorize Mayor to execute letter outlining the City's concerns about the proposed expansion of the airport. Action: To appove the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 97-58.., entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DEMANDING FUNDS TO MITIGATE THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS LAX HAS ON THE CITY AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION.", and to authorize the Mayor to execute a letter outlining the City's concerns about the proposed expansion of the airport. Motion J�3 , second,& The motion carried by a unanimous vote. eaAL mr5L-5 • ---03;ti Ci 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT OF ABC ACTIONS IN HERMOSA BEACH. Copy of recent ABC action dated July 16, 1997. re pdnd'dd-f o Cou - . questions. S p 15 Q - � � £ Action: To Motion , second unanimous vote. 1 1/(-4 The motion carried by $/o 12. OTHER MATTERS — CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9496 ''\01'0)c\-sc aG\ (471 43' tPtAt 4dqt3ii ov°"-C `)'°e 4"0 S� • ,,o`rtalPA' a. Request from Councilmember Benz to direct staff to develop a fully operational reserve Firefighter Program including paid call positions. Councilmember Benz_spoke to his request. Action: To Motion , second The motion carried by unanimous vote. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: )'etfiNikj055 co --6 c� A ,per, P�� �� ,- Mat 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) ADJOURNMENT ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. Existing Litigation: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Name of Case: Association of Volleyball Professionals v. California Coastal Commission Case Number: BS045799 City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9497 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: 1. Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association 2. Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association 3. Teamsters Union, Local 911 4. Professional and Administrative Employee Group 5. Hermosa Beach Management Association ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, July 22, 1997, at the hour of : P.M. to a Closed Session. CLOSED SESSION - The Closed Session convened at the hour of P.M. At the hour of •P.M. the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS- There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, July 22, 1997, at the hour of : P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, August 12, 1997, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 07-22-97 Page 9498 ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 22, 1997 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session — Immediately following Regular Session CALL TO ORDER: 7:18pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mr. Diaz ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT ANNOUNCEMENTS: 90th Birthday Party, July 26, 1997. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO CINDY WAGNER FOR BEING NAMED THE 1997 NATIONAL BIG SISTER OF THE YEAR AWARD. INTRODUCTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM LORETO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Stephen Sammarco regarding the Hermosa Beach Yellow Bike Program. JO/JB MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on July 1, 1997; and, 2)Minutes of the Regular meeting held on July 8, 1997. PULLED BY JR. CITY CLERK NOTED THAT 7/1/97 MINUTES WILL BE AMENDED TO NOTE MR. LISSNER'S LETTER JR/JB MOTION TO APPROVE MINUTES. VOTE: 5-0 (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the June 1997 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution setting the 1997-98 appropriations limit. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 7, 1997. (f) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Santa Monica Bay Competitive Grant Program for the Valley Park Detention Basin and Eco -System Project. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 16, 1997. (g) Recommendation to authorize additional expenditure from Park Improvement Funds CIP 97-506 for Clark Building Seismic Retrofit Project in an amount of $3,175.. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 14, 1997. (h) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 1997. JB/JO MOTION FOR BALANCE. VOTE: 5-0 2 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION BY THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A SIDEYARD VARIANCE OF 2.2' RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 3 FEET AND THE DETERMINATION ESTABLISHING THE PROJECT BASE ELEVATION FOR MEASURING HEIGHT AT THE NEAREST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT (FLOW LINE OF THE STREET) AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 14, 1997. RB/SE MOTION TO APPROVE BY MINUTE ORDER '1HE USE OF 1.11E NEAREST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AS THE BASIS FOR MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT. VOTE: 4-1(JR NO) JO/SE MOTION TO DENY VARIANCE ON NORTH PROPERTY LINE. VOTE: 5-0 SERB MOTION TO SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS TO GRANT THE SOUTH SIDE YARD VARIANCE AND DIRECT STAFF TO BRING BACK A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE FINDINGS AT THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. VOTE: 3-2 (JO/JR-NO) 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD "MASSAGE 'THERAPY" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997, JR/SE MOTION TO AMEND MOTION TO RENEW MEDICAL CER1'114'1CATE ANNUALLY (INCLUDING TECHNICIANS) AND AMEND SECTION 5.74.060(A) TO STATE THAT LIGHTING BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING CODE. VOTE: 3-2 (RB/JB-NO) 3 RB/JB MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DEFINE AND ADD "MASSAGE 'THERAPY BUSINESS" TO A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES AND ADD SPECIAL LICENSING PROVISIONS (AND ADD A PROVISION TO RENEW MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ANNUALLY, INCLUDING TECHNICIANS, AND AMEND SECTION 5.74.060(A) TO STATE THAT LIGHTING BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING CODE) AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS TO '1HE MUNICIPAL CODE AND WAIVE FULL READING. VOTE: 5-0 6. TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHANGE ZONING VIOLATIONS FROM MISDEMEANORS TO INFRACTIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS. JB/JO MOTION TO . CONTINUE TO MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1997. VOTE: 5-0 7. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT AND SELF CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 16, 1997. SE/JO MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. VOTE: 5-0 MUNICIPAL MAI I'ERS 8. STATUS REPORT — DOWNTOWN REINVESTMENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 2, 1997. JB/JO MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 9. STATUS OF THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 15, 1997. SERB MOTION TO DISBAND '1'11L D.E.C. AND AGENDIZE '1'HE ISSUE OF FORMATION OF A P.C.H. ENHANCEMENT COMIVIISSION. VOTE: 5-0 4 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS'- CITY MANAGER a. MEMORANDUM FROM CITY MANAGER REGARDING EXPANSION OF LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. JB/JO MOTION TO AMEND TO INCLUDE OBJECTION TO CHANGES IN '1'HL CEILING, ADOPT RESOLUTION AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO EXECUTE LETTER OUTLINING 'DIE CITY'S CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE AIRPORT. VOTE: 5-0 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT OF ABC ACTIONS IN HERMOSA BEACH. Copy of recent ABC action dated July 16, 1997. RB/SE MOTION FOR COUNCIL TO CONFIRM LETTER TO GOVERNOR WILSON. VOTE: 4-0 (JB -ABSTAIN) 12. O'1'HER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Councilmember Benz to direct staff to develop a fully operational reserve Firefighter Program including paid call positions. I ITEM WITHDRAWN. CITIZEN COMMENTS Jim Curnut: Wants crosswalks painted at 16th & Manhattan Ave., Ardmore & Pier Ave., 22nd Street & Hermosa Ave.. Also stated need for parking markings to be repainted in areas above Hermosa Avenue.. 5 ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN- CLOSED CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: RB/SE MOTION TO ADD STULL V. BANK OF AMERICA TO CLOSED SESSION. VOTE: 5-0 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held: a. b. June 24, 1997; and, July 8, 1997. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Association of Volleyball Professionals v. California Coastal Commission Case Number: BSO45799 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT TO 8/12/97, 6:00PM TO INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION. MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 1, 1997, at the hour of 7:25 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Pete Tucker, Planning Commissioner ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky Absent: Edgerton ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Reviczky announced that the purpose of tonight's meeting was to receive public input on the preliminary parking structure design alternatives to be presented this evening by the architect. He said the workshop had been scheduled because Council wanted to ensure that those most affected by the project had the opportunity to be involved early in the design process. He described the meeting format, saying there would be a brief staff report followed by a presentation by the parking structure architects and then audience comments. He invited interested members of the public to walk up during thepresentation to look at the model which was located in the middle of the room. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - None CONSIDERATION OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR, DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTI- LEVEL PARKI G STRUC URE TO BE DEVELOPED ON PUBLI PARKING LOT C, - fid mati n+- Kti: r -'i c6 CQQs%,�it,iale,t .(� 1 J 19`1 t7, City Manager Burrellreiterated that the primary pur ose of this workshop meeting was to gather public input before the design process began and actual plans were developed for the proposed parking structure on lot C, so that public comments could be taken into account throughout the design process. He said the architects had prepared a model and design alternatives relating to site constraints. He said tonight's discussion would be informal and would be followed up by future meetings as the project moves along. Councilmember Oakes left the meeting at 7:30 p.m., noting -that she had already heard the architect's presentation at an earlier Council subcommittee meeting. Pauline Souza, of Gordon H. Chong & Partners architectural firm, presented a site -analysis board prepared after the initial visit to the site which showed a mix of commercial and residential in the area, a primary view corridor down 13th Street, the retail area anticipated on the Hermosa Avenue edge and pedestrian access, noting this was one layer of information gathered to help with the development of the project. She said they also read the environmental impact report and were aware of concerns about lighting, security, mass and bulk. She reviewed the size of the site and the proposed structure, noting that a portion of 13th Street would be used. She then reviewed the structural and functional considerations and said the current proposal showed hotel access at the northwest corner of the structure and public City Council Minutes 07-01-97 Page 9472 a 0) access at the southeast corner, noting that the southeast corner would be notched for queuing into the structure. She said the structure, which would be 22 feet 8 inches at its highest point, would have two elevated decks with a one-way system. She said the hotel entrance would access. 100 parking stalls on the ground level, and the public entrance would access 11 parking spaces on the bottom level and 300 total on the two elevated decks. She said an area on the east side of the ground floor would accommodate trash, electrical, storage and office space She said there would be two lanes for queuing at the public entrance to enable cars to pull up and stack and then go up a five - percent ramp. She pointed out the locations of the elevators and stairs and then reviewed the architectural and landscape considerations. She said based on the site, the structure should be kept low and simple and stressed the importance of keeping the view corridor at 13th Street clear. She said the proposed architecture was very simple with a lot of horizontal lines and was in keeping with architecture found along the beaches in California and in Greece, and she referred to the display showing elevations and images of other structures. She reviewed the proposed landscaping around the structure and suggested a green plaza on the Hermosa Avenue side since it was as yet unknown when retail would be developed at that location. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Chris Bennett - 1286 Strand, asked how long it would take to build the structure and if any pre -fab work would be involved (Ms. Souza said construction would take from 13 to 15 months and that the entire structure would be built on site); Sam Perrotti - 1506 Golden Avenue, Planning Commissioner, said people had expressed concerns about security at the Planning Commission meeting and asked about proposed lighting and other security measures (Ms. Souza said the structure would be as open as possible to avoid dark or hidden areas and would be painted a light color to keep it bright inside; re the lighting; said the fixtures would be located in the center of all of the drive aisles, at the corners, in the stair corridors and at the entrances, noting that the all of the fixtures would be focused down to keep the lighting contained in the parking structure, with no overspill to impact adjacent properties) (Mayor Reviczky noted the possibility of eventually moving parking enforcement into the structure, saying that the presence of officers would further enhance the security of the structure); Steve Goddard - 57 14th Court, expressed concern about anticipated traffic usage on his street; asked if the parking structure walls would be high enough to prevent the glare of headlights from shining into his home; also concerned about noise from cars going up and down the ramp (Ms. Souza said hotel patrons would have access down 14th Court, noting the need for further study of that street before final decisions; said the structure walls would be high enough to City Council Minutes 07-01-97 Page 9473 r! shield headlights and that any noise would be minimal due to the gradual 5 -percent slope) (Mayor Reviczky noted the structure would have an attendant and cars would be permitted to enter only if there were available parking spaces to accommodate them, so no one would be circling in search for a parking space); Pat Spiritus - 1610 Strand, business owner of 58 11th Street, referred to the commercial lot between the parking structure and Hermosa Avenue and suggested consideration of a pedestrian -friendly open-air market at that location until such time as the site is developed; suggested motorcycle parking for any odd shaped small spaces left over in the structure after the designation of parking spaces; also suggested bicycle parking within the structure and asked about the use of amber lighting (Ms. Souza said although high-pressure sodium lighting was sometimes used in parking structures, they were recommending a white light because it was the most efficient and would blend with most of the downtown lighting; said there would be areas on the ground floor for motorcycle and bicycle parking; said some features could be changed depending on the use in front); John Hales - 624 Eighth Place, asked how the future store fronts facing Hermosa Avenue in front of :the parking structure would be serviced by large service and trash trucks (Ms. Souza said they were recommending a temporary green plaza until the area in question is developed) (Mayor Reviczky said there were no proposals to provide retail at this time, and that Hermosa Avenue would be available forservicing whatever stores go in there in the future);` Pete Tucker - 235 34th Street, Planning Commissioner, said during its environmental review of the project the Commission had hoped for planters or something similar to break up the massiveness of thestructure itself, and for a break in the structure on the north end to allow more light and ventilation for the homes there (Ms. Souza said the elevation at the north edge was proposed to be a maximum of 11 feet 6 inches and that it would taper along with the structure to reduce the massiveness and minimize the build -out; said the notch for queuing would also preserve some of the view corridor; and said landscaping would be placed on all sides of the structure, not just the north side).; Tiffany Moher - owner of a retail shop on Hermosa Avenue, asked about alternative parking places during the construction period and if access to her business would be affected (Community Development Director Blumenfeld said the City would arrange a temporary shuttle program to deal with the interim use of some remote parking toprimarily accommodate the downtown employees, which would offset about 300 parking spaces in the downtown and more than make up for the lost parking on lot C; said the City also would be looking at a permanent shuttle program; said neither Hermosa City Council Minutes 07-01-97 Page 9474 Avenue nor 15th Street would be closed during construction); Steve Goddard - 57 14th Court, said he currently had two parking spaces directly in front of his house which would be eliminated when the street was opened to traffic, asked what consideration there would be for his parking and if he would be able to have spaces assigned to him in the parking structure; asked if curbs would be installed (Community Development Director Blumenfeld said the speaker's house was an existing non -conforming residential use in the downtown and if the use were to change, the building would have to be brought into conformity; said if the two referenced parking spaces are located on 14th Court, a public alley proposed to become a functioning public alley, it would be up to the property owner to provide parking; said a parking policy regarding the allocation of parking spaces in the parking structure was an issue that the Council would be considering at a future time; said Public Works had looked at the issue of improvement but there were currently no curbs or radical changes planned for the street elevations); Hal Burger - 68 14th Street, said he accessed his garage from 14th Court, expressed concern about safety due to the increased traffic flow; asked about increased noise from the open top deck of the structure created by patrons exiting their vehicles; asked about an echoing effect on the first level; asked about litter control and lighting (Community Development Blumenfeld said ingress and egress currently taken off 14th Court would continue; said 14th Court was a currently closed off public alley which would become an open public alley and it was not clear that the parking structure would create an increased traffic flow on 14th Court, noting that the primary entrance to the structure is from 13th Street; said there was a problem concerning nonconforming uses on that street which was an issue that would have to be addressed) (Ms. Souza said the top deck of the structure should be no noisier than the current parking lot; said the parking structure would be an open design which would minimize noise bouncing off of hard surfaces; said trash receptacles were typically located at the stairways; said they would be very careful to ensure that light is not directly focused on any adjoining properties); John Hales - 624 Eighth Place, asked if there would be dedicated spaces at the west end of the structure to accommodate service trucks for the hotel (Community Development Director Blumenfeld said when the hotel project was reviewed by Council and the Planning Commission in December, a drop-off area for guests and service was added as a result of the environmental review process and the terminus of 13th Street was to be designed as a loading area to serve all of the businesses and to service special events, and that no City Council Minutes 07-01-97 Page 9475 spaces would be provided in the parking structure for service vehicles); Craig French - 1300 The Strand, expressed concern about noise and asked if there was any type of surface texture to eliminate the screeching of tires that occurred in garages on rainy days (Ms. Souza said the squeal of tires can be eliminated with a gripping surface in the concrete) (Sam Nunes, architect, said the noise came from people on foot going to and from their cars, walking in the stairwells or waiting for elevators; said the stairwells and elevators would be located in the corners at 13th Street/Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street/Beach Drive to keep the most public areas of the garage away from the hotel and the residences; said cars make no more noise in a structure than they do on surface streets; said they would use tooth in the finish of the concrete to create a grip between the tire and the surface and eliminate the squeal of tires); and Chris Bennett - asked if 13th Street would be closed during the construction and asked about parking validation (Ms. Souza said there would be access on 13th Street but no parking both during and after construction) (Mayor Reviczky said parking validation wasan issue to be determined at a future date). Mayor Reviczky noted there would be future meetings on this item and asked the architects to deliver the model to City Hall well in advance of the next public hearing to allow for adequate public review. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, July 1, 1997 at the hour of 8:26 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, July 8, 1997 at the hour of 7:10 P.M. City ler CityCouncil Minutes 07-01-97 Page 9476 1i , JUL-22-97 TUE 13:17 J.H.LISSNER 310 376 2287 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Total number of pages including this cover sheet 3 Date TU 7-22-97 Time To/Recipient Hermosa Beach City Council - Please agendize at fax number auto voice phone number 318-0216 From/ Sender: Message: James Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Fax number: (310) 376-2287 Voice number: (310) 375.4626 There machine on this line and it picks up P.01 Beach, CA 90254 is an answering after 5 rings. Regular council meeting of 7-22, agenda item 1 (a) 1) , minutes of 7-1 meeting. Councilmembers: On July 1 at 3:15 p.m. I sent the attached fax to your offices. 1 ask that it be included in the record of and mentioned in the minutes for the July 1 meeting. Thank you, Enclosure Important: The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from James Lissner. This information is intended solely for use by the individual or entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so that we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 a ('i) JUL-22-97 TUE 13:18 J.H.LISSNER 310 376 2287 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Total number of pages including this cover sheet 2 Date TU 7-1-97 Time 3:15 p.m. To/Recipient Hermosa Beach City Council at fax number auto voice phone number 318-0216 From/ Sender: James Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Fax number: (310) 376-2287 Voice number: (310) 376-4626 There machine on this line and it picks up Beac is an after h, CA 90254 answering 5 rings. Message/subject: Special council meeting set for tonight The avowed purpose of tonight's meeting about the parking structure design is to receive the public's input, yet the existence of the meeting is the best kept secret in town. This important meeting has been set on a night that is not a normal council meeting night. We (residents, businessmen, staff, reporters) are accustomed to council meetings that are on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays, so do not look for a meeting on the 1st Tuesday. In fact, as of late yesterday afternoon, even most city staff members did not know about the meeting - including the staff members whose job it is to "book" the room! P.02 Hermosa has tried to be a leader in public access to meetings. For a number of years we've been able to brag that all of our meetings (not just council) are televised, and "live", too. So it is unusual, and an important omission ("Most Americans get their news from... television") that the agenda for this meeting was not posted on local cable. And, it is unusual that it will not be televised .hive (the meeting is not listed on the cable station's on -air program schedule for this evening - according to City Manager Burrell with whom I talked at 1 p.m. today, there is a technical problem that prevents live broadcast). "Live" is very important for two reasons - first, it gets people to watch. Why do you think the Los Angeles Tv news shows have a reporter "live at the scene" to report a fire that was put out four hours before? And, second, "live" gets people at home to drop what they are doing, put on their shoes (or take them off), and race down to the meeting, thus providing more input. JUL-22-97 TUE 13:19 J.H.LISSNER 310 376 2287 • P.03 I am on the mailing list for council agendas, yet I did not receive a mailed agenda. Nor was the agenda posted on the city's Web page. Yet, merchants downtown received two notices. One of the aforementioned notices to downtown merchants mentioned that design materials or a model would be placed at the council chambers for review prior to the tonight's meeting, but as of 2 p.m_ today, no materials of any kind were available for review by the public. Councilmembers, do you expect to get a balanced idea of the public's opinion if only one small sector of the public knows about the meeting? And do you expect to receive thoughtful, thoroughly considered comments if only a select few (councilmembers, commissioners, senior staff) have had a chance to see the materials prior to the meeting? This so-called "public input session" doesn't begin to meet this city's usual standards of "public," so should be rescheduled. It should occur on a 2nd or 4th Tuesday during a regular council meeting, with agendas mailed, posted on the Web, and posted on the cable bulletin board - all the usual places. It should be televised live, with several day's advance notice of same placed on the cable company's on -air program schedule - as is usual for all our meetings. And the session should wait until the public has had at least a few days to inspect the models or other design materials - again, as is usual. cc: Media Important: The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from James Lissner. This information is intended solely for use by the individual or entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so that we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. igereevee MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 8, 1997, at the hour of 7:17 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - James Dewey ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler,Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky Absent: None MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Reviczky reminded the viewing audience of the approaching Sister City Association Gala Celebration in honor of Hermosa Beach's 90th birthday and the 300th anniversary of its Sister City of Loreto, Mexico, to be held on Saturday, July 26, 1997, at 7:00 P.M. on the tennis courts at the Community Center with a ticket cost of $25 per adult, $10 for children. PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF A CHECK TO THE CITY FROM SHIRLEY WHITE FOR VALLEY PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IN MEMORY OF BETTY BENOIT. Mayor Reviczky accepted a check for $2,000 from Shirley White for Valley Park Playground equipment in memory of Betty Benoit. Ms. White said that the fund had been established by Betty's friends and was being given to pay for the "bug" and for a bench and a tree later in the park renovation. Mayor Reviczky announced that tonight's meeting would be adjourned in memory of Betty Benoit. DONATION FROM HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB TO HERMOSA BEACH SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION FOR 90TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION - Dean Nota, President of the Rotary Club, presented a check for $1,000 to Dick McCurdy and Jean Lombardo representing the Hermosa Beach Sister City Association to be used for the July 26,1997, birthday celebration. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Pete Tucker - 235 -34th Street, said that a lot of the new construction occurring had utility company "dig alerts" spray painted on sidewalks and streets and suggested that the City have a provision to remove these markings when construction was complete as they tended to look like graffiti; and, City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9477 Charlie Chatem - 538 Second Street, said that in a list of the nation's wealthiest cities published by "Worth" magazine, Hermosa Beach ranked number 211. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS: Mayor Reviczky, with the consensus of the Council, directed that staff explore Mr. Tucker's suggestion that contractors be required to clean the sidewalks and streets of utility companies' "dig alert" markings after construction. (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (j), with the exception of the following item which was removedfor discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for. clarity: (e) Benz. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on June 24, 1997. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 24, 1997 as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 10661 THROUGH 10772 INCLUSIVE, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NO. 10751 AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NO. 9941 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 18, 1997. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of June 18, 1997. City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9478 (e) RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO CLOSE THE MUNICIPAL PIER AT NIGHT UNTIL THE PIER REHABILITATION PROJECT IS COMPLETE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 1, 1997. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public. Works Director Amirani and City Manager Stephen Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to close the Municipal Pier at night, one hour after sunset, until the Pier rehabilitation project is completed as the cost of rewiring to meet safety needs would be approximately $15,000 and then the new wiring would have to be removed for the Pier renovation. Motion Mayor Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATIONS FROM CHEVRON COMPANIES AND BETTY BENOIT MEMORIAL FUND. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated June 30, 1997. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to accept and to appropriate to the Community Resources Department the donation of $6,000 from Chevron Companies for supplies and payment of instructors for the Summer Surf Camp and the donation of $2,000 from the Betty Benoit Memorial Fund for playground equipment at Valley Park. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL• PARCEL MAP #24521 FOR A 4 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1069 7TH STREET, 1048 8TH STREET, 1075 7TH STREET AND 1052 8TH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 1, 1997. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No 97-5871, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24521 FOR A FOUR - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1069 7TH STREET & 1048 8TH STREET, AND 1075 7TH STREET & 1052 8TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP #24603 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 603 30TH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 1, 1997. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No 97-5872, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24603 FOR A TWO - City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9479 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 603 THIRTIETH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (i) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP #24632 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 928 17TH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 1, 1997. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No 97-5873, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24632 FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 928 SEVENTEENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (j) RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD OF CHANGE TO EXISTING CONTRACT FOR THE SEWER SYSTEM AT THE VICINITY OF 24TH STREET AND MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 1, 1997. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) authorize the Director of Public Works to issue a change order to the existing City contract with W.A. Rasic Construction for an amount not to exceed $95,000 for the, Sewer Segments at the intersection of 24th Street and Palm Drive to Loma Drive, west of Park Avenue; 2) authorize additional expenditure from the Sewer Rehabilitation project (CIP 3) authorize increasing CMI additional inspection and for an amount not to. exceed. for a total expenditure not to emergency sewer repairs. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 96-408); and, Contract to include construction management $7,000, exceed $102,500 for the At 7:30 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION Items 1(e) was heard at this time but is shown for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS SEPARATE in order consent 4. LOWER PIER AVENUE - INVESTIGATION OF STREET CLOSURE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 2, 1997. Supplemental letter from Leanne and Andrew City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9480 ,y Clifton, 525 - 24th Street, in support of a pedestrian plaza. Councilmember Bowler declared a potential conflict of interest due to being in negotiations for business property on lower Pier Avenue and left the dais and the room at 7:30 P.M. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:34 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Ouentin Thelan - 11 Pier Avenue, said that he has had the property for 44 years and originally there had been three entrances to his parking lot, now there was only one; said this presented a hardship for his long-time customers and asked that Pier Avenue remain open to vehicular traffic; Dallas Yost - 65 Pier Avenue, said that the retail merchants on lower Pier Avenue were dying due to the street closure to traffic and parking; said that people could not get down to the area and asked that the area be left open to vehicular traffic; spoke of the parking revenue being lost to the City; Rick Hankus - 157 Pier Avenue, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that the area now has a great atmosphere, that people stay in the downtown and seem to enjoy mingling, and that no business has closed; urged the Council not to reopen Pier Avenue to vehicles; Julian Katz - 1125 Ninth Street, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that without cars the area has the opportunity to be a pleasant focal point for the City; asked the Council to take a long range view of what the area could become; Nancy Holbrook - 936 Hermosa Avenue, #103, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that she was a downtowner and wanted the street to be closed to traffic; said that Hermosa was coming alive again; said the pedestrian plaza could be a marketing trade mark for the City; Bill Goldblum - Brewski's, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said the downtown plaza has made Hermosa unique; urged the Council to keep it closed to traffic and make it a wonderful place to meet and dine; Abel Ybarra - 709 First Place, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that the City has come back with the closing of Pier Avenue; suggested that the alley between the Bijou and Pier could be the loading zone for the businesses; City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9481 Nancy McCutchen - 1309 Loma Drive, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that closing the street to vehicles would be perfect, very European; Russell Anderson - 1818 The Strand, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that this was the best thing to happen in Hermosa for a long time; Jim Dewey - 711 Manhattan Avenue, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that a mix of cars and pedestrians would be a risk to the City; but if it were opened to cars in the winter months it should be free parking for one hour maximum so that parking meters did not have to be installed; questioned allowing bicycles, skateboards and rollerbladers; questioned if it was illegal to deface the street; Pete Tucker - 235 - 34th Street, said that if the area was closed to vehicles then the Council should address the problem of skateboarders and make the area pedestrian only; John Hales - 624 Eighth Place, said that he would like it to be 100 percent pedestrian but if cars were allowed it should be for one hour maximum and only during the week -days; said the City could then consider closing the area to traffic and parking after the parking structure is completed; Carolyn Barbre - 1233 Hermosa Avenue, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that opening the area to traffic would set a precedent; said that 13th could be turned into a one-way alley; asked where the fountain would be placed; Sam Perrotti - 1506 Golden, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; urged the Council to keep the red lights on the Strand; said the stainless steel was already tarnishing and everyone was asking when the benches would be replaced as no one liked them; Harold Shumacher - Hermosa Cyclery, asked that lower Pier Avenue be open for traffic and parking except for special events; asked that skateboards be banned; Jerry Compton - Hermosa Beach, said that the R/UDAT recommendation had been to leave the street open to one-way traffic as traditional access should not be changed unless necessary; said that he liked the flexibility of the design and asked the Council to go with the recommendation of the experts; Missy Sheldon - 1800 The Strand, spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; said that everyone she talked with loved the idea of a pedestrian plaza but if the Council allowed cars it should City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9482 be until 5:00 P.M. only and not on week -ends; and, Pat Corwin - spoke in support of a pedestrian plaza; congratulated the Council; said that it looked very nice; said that auto fumes were not conducive to dining; asked that the street remain closed to vehicles. The public hearing closed at 8:20 P.M. Proposed Action: To approve alternative 3, for street closure to vehicular traffic at specified times. Motion Mayor Reviczky. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To maintain the area as a pedestrian plaza on an experimental basis until February, 1998, and then review the issue of vehicle access. Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote, noting the absence of Bowler. Councilmember Oakes requested that the stainless parking strips be placed in the street as a design element. The meeting recessed at the hour of 8:28 P.M. The meeting reconvened at the hour of 8:55 P.M. and Councilmember Bowler returned to the dais. 5. APPEAL SIGN Memorandum Blumenfeld. Lagerhausen VARIANCE 97-1 FOR VASEK POLAR, INC. - BMW. from Community Development Director Sol Supplemental letter in opposition from Alana dated July 8, 1997. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:02 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Fritz Hitchcock - Vasek Polak General Manager, spoke to the request for a variance saying that one sign would be only four feet higher (present height is 18', new height to be 22') and the other would be 14' lower (present height is 25', new height to be 11'1; said the present signs are both non -conforming. The public hearing closed at 9:10 P.M. Action: To overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, grant the sign variance and adopt Resolution No. 97-8574, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SIGN VARIANCE FOR ONE MONUMENT SIGN 22 FEET IN HEIGHT City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9483 ti LOCATED IN A PLANTER ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AT 2901 & 3001 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, VASEK POLAR BMW." Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At the hour of 9:15 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to item 3 to hear item 1(e). 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Burrell gave two oral reports: 1) that the Grand Opening for the downtown renovation project was scheduled for Saturday, August 16, 1997, and that more details would be given later, but asked that the Council and anyone interested save that date; and, 2) that Jim Lissner had dismissed his lawsuit against the City without prejudice. City Attorney Michael Jenkins responded to council questions regarding the possibility of recovering the City's legal cost for the lawsuit. Action: To add to the closed session agenda the discussion of recovering the City's legal costs from the Lissner lawsuit as the matter had arisen after the agenda was posted and it was a matter that needed immediate attention. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL. a. VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. EXPIRATION OF TERMS - PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 2, 1997. Supplemental memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 7, 1997 City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To continue to accept applications until Wednesday, August 6, 1997 and to schedule a meeting prior to the regular meeting of August 12, 1997, at the hour of 6:00 P.M., to interview the four current applicants and any others that might apply for the Parks, Recreation and Community ,Resources Advisory Commission, with the appointments to be made later that evening at the regular meeting. Motion Mayor Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9484 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: a. Request from Councilmember Benz to give police officers the option to wear either blues or shorts. Councilmember Benz spoke to his request. Police Chief Val Straser responded to Council questions and said that he would bring the matter up with the Police Officer's Association. Proposed Action: To approach the Police Association to give them a choice. Motion Benz. The motion was withdrawn by the maker. There was no further action taken on this item. CITIZEN COMMENTS No one came forward to address the Council at this time. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. Existing Litigation: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Name of Case: Stern v. City of Hermosa Beach. Case Number: YCO28739 2. Initiation of Litigation: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). Number of Potential Cases: 2 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: As Follows: 1. Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association 2. Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association 3. Teamsters Union, Local 911 4. Professional and Administrative Employee Group 5. Hermosa Beach Management Association ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, July 8, 1997, at the hour of 9:30 P.M. to a Closed Session. City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9485 CLOSED SESSION - The Closed Session convened at the hour of 9:40 P.M. At the hour of 10:25 P.M. the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS - There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa. Beach adjourned in the memory of long-time resident Betty Benoit on Tuesday, July 8, 1997, at the hour of 10:25 P.M. to the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Tuesday, July 22, 1997, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 07-08-97 Page 9486 VOUCHRE2 07/01/97 16:25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 10773 07/01/97 006483 IMAX MOVIE THEATRE SUMMER CAMP EXCURSION/JULY 97 001-4601-4201 264.75 264.75 TOTAL CHECKS 264.75 16 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/01/97 16:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND. TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 264.75 TOTAL 264.75 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/03/97 08:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 10774 07/03/97 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 001-1103 283,082.77 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 105-1103 8,199.82 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 109-1103 595.34 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 110-1103 27,963.05 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 117-1103 600.92 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 126-1103 109.38 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 145-1103 2,385.44 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 152-1103 1.50 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 160-1103 10,555.97 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 705-1103 923.94 PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-97 715-1103 2,879.33 337,297.46 TOTAL CHECKS 337,297.46 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/03/97 08:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 283,082.77 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 8,199.82 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 595.34 110 PARKING FUND 27,963.05 117 AB939 FUND 600.92 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 109.38 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 2,385.44 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 1.50 160 SEWER FUND 10,555.97 705 INSURANCE FUND 923.94 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2,879.33 TOTAL 337,297.46 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 07/03/97 17:40 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 10775 07/03/97 007017 ACCOUNTEMPS 10776 07/03/97 007197 ACCURATE BUSINESS SYSTE 10777 07/03/97 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 10778 07/03/97 002185 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 10779 07/03/97 006214 AKM CONSULTING ENGINEER 10780 10781 10782 10783 10784 07/03/97 000245 07/03/97 006827 07/03/97 008184 07/03/97 007316 07/03/97 000407 ALERT ALL ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CHRISTOPHOR,E ANGELO ANTIQUE CORRAL, INC. AVIATION LOCK & KEY 10785 07/03/97 008198 DAVID BEUTEL 10786 07/03/97 008183 BRIGHTON ESCROW 10787 07/03/97 003999 BSN SPORTS 10788 07/03/97 008194 ERIK BUCKETT 10789 07/03/97 008187 JANET,F BUCKLEY 10790 07/03/97 008196 RUSSELL BURRUSS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TEMP FIN CLERK/WE 6/13/97 GUEST CHAIRS/PUBLIC WORKS DICTAPHONE SHELVES/POLICE DEPT RADIO MAINT/POLICE EMERGENCY ALERT TONE REPAIR ENGINEER/DRAINAGE PLAN CHECK ENGINEERS/DRAINAGE PLAN CHECK EDUCATION SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV/6/8-21-97 WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE LOCK REPAIR SERVICES KEYS MADE/APRIL 97 VEHICLE KEYS MADE REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE RECORDING FEES PROGRAM SUPPLIES CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE 10791 07/03/97 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT SPECIAL SWEEP/ EMER SPILL 10792 07/03/97 008188 DELIA CAMACHO 10793 07/03/97 008199 JAMIE CARRETTA 10794 07/03/97 000332 CRAIG CASNER 10795 07/03/97 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY 10796 07/03/97 000354 COAST IRRIGATION CO. CITATION REFUND SPRING 97 CLASS REFUND WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND CARTRIDGE/POLICE DEPT TONER IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/MAY 97 10797 07/03/97 008169 COLEMAN METHODS CORP. SCOOP FORKS FOR BACKHOE BUCKET 5 ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-1204-4201 001-4202-4305 170-2103-5401 001-2101-4307 001-2101-4307 160-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 001-2201-4317 001-2102-4201 001-2110 001-2111 160-3102-4309 715-4206-4311 715-4206-4311 001-2111 001-1201-4201 001-4601-5401 110-3302 001-2110 001-2111 001-3104-4201 110-3302 001-2111 001-2110 001-2101-4305 001-1206-4309 001-4202-4309 001-3104-5402 ITEM AMOUNT 680.00 270.63 791.40 151.40 308.11 1,452.00 1,662.00 972.50 2,303.24 1,600.00 50.00 77.64 2.71 3.25 25.00 45.00 3,310.35 20.00 1,600.00 50.00 130.00 5.00 20.00 1,600.00 67.32 161.13 53.86 1,279.18 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 680.00 270.63 942.80 308.11 3,114.00 972.50 2,303.24 1,600..00 50.00 83.60 25:00 45.00 . 3,310.35 20.00 1,600.00 50.00 130.00 5.00 20.00 1,600.00 228.45 53.86 1,279.18 VOUCHRE2 07/03/97 17:40 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME 10798 07/03/97 007700 CPRS 10799 07/03/97 007627 JIM CUBBERLY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AGENCY MEMBERSHIP ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4315 INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 97 001-4601-4221 10800 07/03/97 006178 DOMINO COMPUTER CENTER PENTIUM 166MHZ COMPUTER 001-1206-5401 10801 07/03/97 008185 DOUG GALLOWAY PLUMBING WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2110 10802 07/03/97 008193 GARRET DUNLAP 10803 07/03/97 008179 ROBERT FIESELMAN 10804 07/03/97 005314 FRY'S ELECTRONICS CITATION REFUND 1996 ASSESSMENT REBATE 110-3302 105-3105 2 5" PORTABLE TV'S/POLICE DEPT 153-2106-5401 10805 07/03/97 007115 GILLIS & ASSOCIATES ARC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 140-8622-4201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 127-8622-4201 REFUND 97 SPRING FORFEIT FEE 001-2111 CLASS INSTRUCTION/SPRING 97 001-4601-4221 10806 07/03/97 005513 EARL GIRARD 10807 07/03/97 007764 GRAVITY RESEARCH 10808 07/03/97 001340 GTE 10809 07/03/97 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO 10810 07/03/97 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. 10811 07/03/97 007925 HEIMBERGER HIRSCH & ASS 10812 07/03/97 000451 HERMOSA BCH FIREFIGHTER 10813 07/03/97 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10814 07/03/97 003432 HOME DEPOT EQUIP RENTAL/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4201-4304 TEMP BUILDING INSP/WE 6/12/97 001-4201-4201 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/GREENBELT 126-8508-4201 1997 SPRING CPR CLASSES 001-4601-4221 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/6/16/97 705-1217-4324 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/6/23/97 705-1217-4324 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/MAY 97 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/APRIL 97 SMALL TOOLS/APRIL 97 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/MAY 97 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/MAY 97 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/APRIL 97 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/MAY 97 TABLES FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/APRIL 97 160-3102-4309 160-3102-4309 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 001-4204-4309 105-2601-4309 001-4204-4309 160-3102-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 175.00 1,207.50 997.19 1,600.00 47.00 75.96 497.93 5,410.09 1,730.00 50.00 369.60 103.12 184.00 92.03. 243.80 162.23 58.34 28.80 40.97 79.89 66.44 1,980.00 113.13 40.00 4,707.00 4,638.30 226.48 360.45 44.32 23.56 78.06 105.40 24.85 377.47 120.13 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 175.00 1,207.50 997.19 1,600.00 47.00 75.96 497.93 7,140.09 50.00 369.60 103.12 956.50 1,980.00 113.13 40.00 9,345.30 VOUCHRE2 07/03/97 17:40 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/MAY 97 10815 07/03/97 000277 HOZIES RADIATOR SERVICE RADIATORS FOR GO -4'S 10816 07/03/97 008182 VICTOR IDROVO CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 10817 07/03/97 008174 INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH CONTRIBUTION/OIL RECYCLING 10818 07/03/97 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/MAY 97 10819 07/03/97 008181 DARIUS,W JOHNSON 10820 07/03/97 004413 DARREN KNOP 10821 07/03/97 005026 KOMPAN, INC. 10822 07/03/97 008173 LASER MANIA 10823 07/03/97 008200 MONICA LINNELL 10824 07/03/97 004611 GREGORY LUTZ 10825 07/03/97 008197 HUGH,JOHN MC DONALD 10826 07/03/97 008178 DOROTHY MCDONALD 10827 07/03/97 003080 MERRIMAC ENERGY GROUP 10828 07/03/97 000857 NANCY FOODS 10829 07/03/97 008177 JOHN,M. O'CONNOR 10830 07/03/97 000093 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 10831 07/03/97 007090 MARGARET PARKER 10832 07/03/97 006581 MARGARET PAWLOWSKI 10833 07/03/97 008189 ERIC,S POOLE CITATION REFUND REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE PLAYGROUND EQUIP/VALLEY PARK DEPOSIT SUMMER EXCURSION SPRING 97 CLASS REFUND WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE 1996 ASSESSMENT REBATE UNLEADED/CITY YARD/JUNE 97 PRISONER MEALS/JUNE 97 1996 ASSESSMENT REBATE AUTO REPAIRS/APRIL 97 AUTO REPAIRS/MAY 97 AUTO REPAIRS/MAY 97 AUTO REPAIRS/MAY 97 AUTO REPAIR/MAY 97 1996 ASSESSMENT REBATE CLASS REFUND/SPRING 97 WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 10834 07/03/97 003910 PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRA ALIGNMENT/MAY 97 ALIGNMENT/MAY 97 ALIGNMENT/MAY 97 ALIGNMENT/MAY 97 ALIGNMENT/AMBULANCE/MAY 97 ALIGNMENT/MAY 97 ALIGNMENT/JUNE 97 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-2601-4309 715-3302-4311 110-3302 117-5301-4201 001-4202-4309 110-3302 001-2111 001-4202-5402 001-4601-4201 001-2111 001-2110 001-2111 105-3105 001-1401 001-2101-4306 105-3105 715-2201-4311 715-4202-4311 715-2101-4311 715-3302-4311 715-4202-4311 105-3105 001-2111 001-2110 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2201-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 ITEM AMOUNT 141.30 420.02 50.00 624.00 218.62 5.00 50.00 4,959.92 400.00 50.00 1,600.00 50.00 37.98 4,425.78 40.93 37.98 73.58 198.94 28.49 111.46 79.38 37.98 40.00 1,600.00 66.50 38.50 38.50 38.50 82.50 38.50 38.50 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 1,502.02 420.02 50.00 624.00 218.62 5.00 50.00 4,959.92 400:.00 50.00 1,600.00 50.00 37.98 4,425.78 40.93 37.98 491.85 37.98 40.00 1,600.00 VOUCHRE2 07/03/97 17:40 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 10835 07/03/97 003302 JOHN PROUT 10836 07/03/97 004222 GARRICK RAWLINGS 10837 07/03/97 008186 ERIC,W RAYL 10838 07/03/97 007443 NANCY M. SHERMAN 10839 07/03/97 008201 FRED SIMMONS 10840 07/03/97 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP 10841 07/03/97 008176 JULIUS SMITH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ALIGNMENT/MAY 97 REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-2101-4311 001-2111 001-2111 WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2110 1996 ASSESSMENT REBATE DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND COFFEE MAKER/CITY COUNCIL MTGS CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 MAINT= SUPPLIES/JUNE 9T PROGRAM SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 PRISONER SUPPLIES 1996 ASSESSMENT REBATE 10842 07/03/97 005136 SOUTHERN CAL SHARPSHOOT RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE RANGE 10843 07/03/97 008067 GREG STARE 10844 07/03/97 007317 CHRIS STERGION 10845 07/03/97 008195 PAUL STEVENS 10846 07/03/97 008180 ANNE SULLIVAN 10847 07/03/97 007110 SHARLEEN TAIRA 10848 07/03/97 008052 TDS ENGINEERING 10849 07/03/97 007923 TELEVISION EQUIPMENT 10850 07/03/97 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE. 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/JUNE 97 QUAL/MAY & JUNE 105-3105 001-2111 001-4204-4309 001-1101-4305 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4308 001-2101-4306 105-3105 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 97 001-2101-4201 PROJECT MANAGER/WOOD MODEL REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE REFUND SPRING 97 FORFEIT FEE 1996 ASSESSMENT REBATE 109-3301-4302 001-2111 001-2111 105-3105 INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 97 001-4601-4221 SIGNAL MODIFICATION CONTRACT COMMUNICATIONS KIT PLUMBING SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 105-8155-4201 001-2101-5402 105-2601-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 38.50 50.00 50.00 1,600.00 37.98 100.00 84.42 88.82 186.57 95.96 74.39 37.98 290.11 405.90 486.04 391.87 461.15 461.15 415.14 415.14 415.14 450.32 450.32 450.32 450.32 450.32 490.44 232.00 50.00 50.00 37.98 63.00 4,127.61 2,952.00 155.53 V PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 380.00 50.00 50.00 1,600.00 37.98 100.00 530.16 37.98 6,483.68 232.00 50.00 50.00 37.98 63.00 4,127.61 2,952.00 - VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/03/97 17:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 10851 07/03/97 007898 UNISPEC CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SERV/STREETSCAPE PROJ 105-8160-4201 10852 07/03/97. 005290 WONDERLAND DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2111 10853 07/03/97 004268 TRACY YATES EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT 001-4201-4317 3.18 3.18- 124,127.19 468.50 85.52 155.53 124,127.19 468.50 85.52 TOTAL CHECKS 201,651.25 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/03/97 17:40 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 47,877.61 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 129,026.26 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 232.00 110 PARKING FUND 807.00 117 AB939 FUND 624.00 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 113.13 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,730.00 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 5,410.09 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 497.93 160 SEWER FUND 3,898.70 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 791.40 705 INSURANCE FUND 9,345.30 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,297.83 TOTAL 201,651.25 10 PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/07/97 10:23 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 10854 07/07/97 000026 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 001-2033 42,783.18 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 105-2033 972.45 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 109-2033 98.63 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 110-2033 3,690.40 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 117-2033 73.70 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 160-2033 1,222.18 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 705-2033 109.94 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 715-2033 238.05 RETIREMENT/6-16 TO 6-30-97 001-3915 16,135.30- 33,053.23 TOTAL CHECKS 33,053.23 I I VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/07/97 10:23 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 26,647.88 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 972.45 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 98.63 110 PARKING FUND 3,690.40 117 AB939 FUND 73.70 160 SEWER FUND 1,222.18 705 INSURANCE FUND 109.94 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 238.05 TOTAL 33,053.23 Fl PAGE 2 v VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS 010882 VOID c3 PAGE 1 VOUCHRE2 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 10855 07/10/97 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 10856 07/10/97 005221 ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 10857 07/10/97 007772 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENG/LOWER PIER 10858 07/10/97 007366 ASTRO/CANON 10859 07/10/97 008204 AT&T 10860 07/10/97 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 10861 07/10/97 000355 BROOKES ELECTRIC 10862 07/10/97 001269 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL 10863 07/10/97 000034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPOR 10864 07/10/97 004184 C.A.P.E. ACCOUNTING 10865 07/10/97 007368 CA MUNICIPAL BUSINESS T 10866 07/10/97 000262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVI 10867 07/10/97 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT 10868 07/10/97 007611 CARMEN'S UNIFORM 10869 07/10/97 006511 CONTINENTAL SERVICE COPIER MAINT CONTRACT/FY 97/98 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/JUNE 97 KEYS/POLICE DEPT. JUNE 97 KEYS MADE/JUNE 97 DUPLICATE KEYS MADE/JUNE97 AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS/6/97 AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS/6/97 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL/97/98 BUSINESS ENVELOPES MEMBERSHIP DUES/JOHNSON CMBTA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP PLAQUE/HAUGEN OFFICE SUPPLIES STREET SWEEPING/JUNE 97 UNIFORMS/STRATIS PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT FY 97/98 !N ACCOUNT NUMBER .001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2101-4304 001-3104-4201 109-8160-4201 001-1208-4201 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4309 110-3302-4305 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-1203-4317 001-1208-4305 001-2101-4201 110-1204-4315 001-2101-4305 001-2201-4305 001-3104-4201 001-2101-4187 001-2201-4309 001-1141-4201 001-1202-4201 110-1204-4201 001-1201-4201 001-1203-4201 001-1208-4201 110-3302-4201 001-4201-4201 001-4101-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 298.17 41.49 178.56 68.40 368.17 125.52 825.00 25,384.85 5,461.20 565.59 6.50 4.88 8.12 475.00 250.00 427.00 270.09 35.00 50.00 30.00 33.29 9,600.00 360.20 23.76 29.15 70.80 72.47 18.74 10.41 29.15 31.24 77.05 25.40 316.52 59.98 47.48 386.13 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 1,080.31 825.00 25,384.85 5,461.20 565.59 19.50 725.00 427.00 • 270.09 35.00 50.00 63.29 9,600.00 383.96 w VOUCHRE2 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 10870 07/10/97 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL BAL TERMINATOR PARKING SYSTEM DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL 10871 07/10/97 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT SIGNAL & STREET LIGHTS/MAY 97 10872 07/10/97 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT FILM DEVELOPING/JUNE 97 FILM DEVELOPING/JUNE 97 FILM DEVELOPING/JUNE 97 10873 07/10/97 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 RETURNED AUTO PARTS/JUNE AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 SMALL TOOL PURCHASE AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 15 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2021 001-2022 110-1204-4201 001-1206-4201 110-1204-4201 105-2601-4251 160-3102-4309 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4305 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4309 97 715-2601-4311 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 715-3102-4311 715-3102-4311 715-4206-4311 715-4206-4309 715-2201-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2201-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3102-4311 715-3102-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2601-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2601-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3102-4311 715-2601-4311 001-2201-4309 715-2101-4311 715-3102-4311 715-3102-4311 715-3102-4311 001-2021 001-2022 ITEM AMOUNT 235.48 235.48- 31.15 4,566.94 233.17 763.23 47.67 45.90 56.96 55.99 1.14 1.14- 26.56 48.87- 15.71 .32 .32- 22.95 96.95 37.93 5.08 28.88 20.92 .43 .43- 8.72 .18 .18- 3.67 64.93 1.33 1.33- 95.42 1.95 1.95- 80.78 1.65 1.65- 19.49 69.23 10.27 23.14 57.25 57.25 18.78 .38 .38 - PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 1,174.52 4,831.26 763.23 150.53 VOUCHRE2 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 10874 07/10/97 001400 EFRAM MOBIL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 RETURNED PARTS/JUNE 97 GAS PURCHASE/MAY & JUNE 97 10875 07/10/97 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 10876 07/10/97 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. EXPRESS MAIL EXPRESS MAIL 10877 07/10/97 007167 ANTHONY P. FERRANTE 10878 07/10/97 004559 FOX PHOTO 10879 07/10/97 008205 CITY OF GLENDALE 96/97 ASSESSMENT REBATE FILM PROCESSING/JUNE 97 MEMBERSHIP/LAMPPAC/COPELAND 10880 07/10/97 000059 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFC MEMBERSHIP DUES/COPELAND 10881 07/10/97 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 97 ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 715-2601-4311 715-2101-4310 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 121-8620-4201 121-8620-4201 105-3105 105-2601-4309 001-1202-4315 001-1202-4315 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 10883 07/10/97 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/06/30/97 705-1217-4324 10884 07/10/97 005356 JOHN HUNTER & ASSOC. STORMWATER RUNOFF ADMIN 160-8302-4201 10885 07/10/97 000372 INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSO MEMBERSHIP DUES/97-98 001-1101-4315 R9 ITEM AMOUNT 76.28 13.79 .28 .28- 12.39 101.74- 17.85 625.00 1,200.00 950.00 290.00 1,700.00 325.00 92.06 13.77 37.98 20.18 50.00 145.00 15.57 33.08 17.51 15.57 33.08 33.08 99.23 50.59 50.59 459.42 782.14 116.74 116.74 114.80 99.23 99.23 200.41 50.59 4,549.95 3,924.50 748.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 771.75 17.85 5,090.00 105.83 37.98 20.18 50.00 145.00 2,387.60 4,549.95 3,924.50 748.00 VOUCHRE2 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 10886 07/10/97 001484 INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK LIABILITY PREMIUM/97-98 10887 07/10/97 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE MAINTENANCE MATERIALS DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 10888 07/10/97 006140 INSTASHRED SECURITY SER SHREDDING SERV/JUNE 97 10889 07/10/97 000781 INTERNATIONAL CONF OF B SUBSCRIPTION/CA FIRE CODE SUBSCRIPTION/CA PLUMBING CODE SUBSCRIPTION/BUILDING CODE 10890 07/10/97 008203 HENRI KAPLAN REFUND FOR BLOCK PARTY PERMIT 10891 07/10/97 003663 KAWAGUCHI HONDA CORPORA HONDA GENERATOR & WHEEL KIT 10892 07/10/97 007136 THE LAKES AT EL SEGUNDO INSTRUCTORS FEE/SPRING 97 10893 07/10/97 004303 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. LANDSCAPE MAINT/JUNE 97 10894 07/10/97 004186 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LA MEMBERSHIP DUES/97-98 10895 07/10/97 000167 LEARNED LUMBER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/JUNE 97 10896 07/10/97 000077 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVIC DRAFTING SUPPLIES/PUBLIC WORKS 10897 07/10/97 003967 LOS ANGELES CASH REGIST ANNUAL MAINT/CASH REGISTER 10898 07/10/97 000213 LOS ANGELES TIMES RECRUITMENT AD/FIREFIGHTERS 10899 07/10/97 003628 DIANNE LOUGHIN EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 10900 07/10/97 000605 MANHATTAN FORD AUTO MAINTENANCE/JUNE 97 AUTO PARTS/JUNE 97 10901 07/10/97 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND LEGAL SERVICES/JUNE 97 10902 07/10/97 007696 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE CONS TOT TAX AUDIT 10903 07/10/97 000857 NANCY FOODS PRISONER MEALS/JULY 97 10904 07/10/97 000399 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL/SWARTZ 10905 07/10/97 007762 NEOPOST 10906 07/10/97 002514 OFFICE DEPOT MAINT & RENTAL/POSTAGE EQUIP OFFICE SUPPLIES/APRIL 97 OFFICE SUPPLIES/MAY 97 CREDIT FOR RETURNED SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 SHELVING SYSTEM PURCHASE ACCOUNT NUMBER 705-1209-4201 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-2101-4201 001-4201-4317 001-4201-4317 001-4201-4317 001-3214 160-3102-5402 001-4601-4221 105-2601-4201 001-1101-4315 001-4202-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4305 110-1204-4201 001-1203-4201 001-2101-4317 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 001-1132-4201 001-1202-4201 001-2101-4306 001-4201-4315 001-1208-4201 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-4201-5602 PAGE 5 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 51,356.00 51,356.00 283.31 5.78 5.78- 283.31 112.00 112.00 32.47 32.47 59.54 38.60 4,546.86 318.50 8,068.00 825.00 38.09 51.84 161.40 209.00 357.20 680.50 56.45 3.69 6,325.00 3,933.18 32.79 95.00 1,786.20 29.97 569.02 125.82- 269.60 307.34 124.48 38.60 4,546.86 318.50 8,068.00 825.00 89.93 161.40 209.00 357.20 680.50 60.14 6,325.00 3,933.18 - 32.79 95.00 1,786.20 VOUCHRE2 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ELECTRIC STAPLER 10907 07/10/97 002954 ORANGE CO SHERIFF'S DEP POST CLASS TUITION/WOLCOTT 10908 07/10/97 008206 ORANGE CO. JOHN WAYNE H HOTEL/POST CLASS/WOLCOTT 10909 07/10/97 002487 PAGENET PAGER RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 PAGER RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 PAGER RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 PAGER RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 PAGER RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 PAGER RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 PAGER. RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 PAGER RENTAL & SERVICE/JUNE 97 10910 07/10/97 001054 PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERE 1997 PHYSICIANS'DESK REFERENCE 10911 07/10/97 007399 POWER SPORTS 10912 07/10/97 001429 RADIO SHACK ROLLER HOCKEY EQUIPMENT MICROCASSETTES/POLICE DEPT VHS TAPES COMPUTER CLEANING SUPPLIES VIDEO TAPES/FIRE DEPT COMPUTER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 10913 07/10/97 003282 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH DIAL -A -WAVE TICKETS/SUMMER 97 10914 07/10/97 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL FEES/MAY 97 10915 07/10/97 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS WELDING SUPPLIES/MAY 97 WELDING SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 10916 07/10/97 000146 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WAT DRINKING WATER/JUNE 97 WATER DISPENSER RENTAL/JUNE 97 10917 07/10/97 000115 SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE C DOWNTOWN AREA MAINT/JUNE 97 10918 07/10/97 003479 SPORTMART 10919 07/10/97 003480 SQUEEKERS & HERB PROGRAM SUPPLIES/PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAM SUPPLIES 10920 07/10/97 005195 STANDARD CONCRETE PRODU CONCRETE/JUNE 97 10921 07/10/97 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE HARDWARE/JUNE 97 HARDWARE/JUNE 97 HARDWARE/JUNE 97 HARDWARE/JUNE 97 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 10922 07/10/97 000131 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT RIVETS/SIGN MAINTENANCE 16 ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-1204-5401 001-2101-4312 001-2101-4312 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 001-1203-4201 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 001-1206-4201 001-2101-4305 001-4601-4308 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4307 001-2201-4305 105-2601-4309 001-4601-4308 001-1131-4201 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4601-4305 001-2201-4309 109-3301-4201 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 001-3104-4309 160-3102-4309 001-4202-4309 105-2601-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3104-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 132.49 34.50 276.48 41.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 103.09 42.75 2.25 359.75 727.31 45.54 28.12 27.03 25.94 2.59 150.00 5,441.49 31.00 30.00 17.00 2.50 4,615.00 21.22 284.50 234.83 103.58 156.86 138.74 212.02 67.90 67.90 - PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 1,182.60 34.50 276.48 198.34 359.75 727.31 129.22 150.00 5,441.49 61.00 19.50 4,615.00 21.22 284.50 234.83 611.20 573.73 573.73 V VOUCHRE2 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 10923 07/10/97 000129 PAUL WOLCOTT 10924 07/10/97 000135 XEROX. CORPORATION 10925 07/10/97 000315 YAMADA COMPANY INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MEALS/POST CLASS/WOLCOTT COPIER MAINT/4/01-06/30/97 COPIER LEASE/04/01-06/30/97 COPIER MAINT/4/01/97-6/30/97 COPIER USE/MAINT/JUNE 97 DRY INK/FIRE DEPT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS/JUNE 97 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS/JUNE 97 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES/JUNE 97 TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4312 001-4601-4201 001-1208-4201 110-3302-4201 001-1208-4201 001-2201-4305 . 001-4202-4309 001-4202-4309 160-3102-4309 001-4202-4309 001-4202-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 120.00 357.50 438.41 357.50 456.70 116.91 50.34 44.65 173.52 44.71 105.92 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 120.00 1,727.02 419.14 166,248.89 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 60,212.01 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 9,030.72 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 29,999.85 110 PARKING FUND 1,358.93 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 105.83 160 SEWER FUND 8,796.13 705 INSURANCE FUND 55,905.95 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 839.47 TOTAL 166,248.89 PAGE 8 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/10/97 17:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE D MANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES / TO I INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR 7/I -/0/92 RE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINA E DIRECTOR DATE "1/V9' PAGE 9 July 17, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council &xxioe, 4 +.t_L Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Resolution regarding sale of assessment bonds for Lower Pier Avenue City Manager One year lease renewal for Easter Seals, ARC and South Bay Center for Counseling in the Community Center Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of July 16, 1997. Community Resources Director Bay Cities Surf Club request for approval of "Aloha Days" Hawaiian and Longboard Surf Contest Community Resources Director Text amendment to change zoning violations from misdemeanors to infractions and administrative penalties with few exceptions. (Continued from meeting of July 22, 1997) Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Downtown Enhancement Commission meeting of September 3, 1997. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of August 20, 1997. Community Resources Director lc . ...... . .... - e Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of September 16, 1997. Community Development Director lc July 16, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS JUNE 1997 Attached are the preliminary June 1997 Revenue and Expenditure Status Reports; these are not the final reports for the year, since many accounting adjustments must be made in July and August to "close the books." Totals for both revenue and expenditures will change when these entries are made. General fund revenue is 96.9% received for 100% of the fiscal year. As indicated previously, building permit and plan check revenue for this year is less than anticipated due to projects being delayed. Community Center rentals, other facilities and class revenues are impacted by renovation of the Clark building. Parking Fund revenue is 107.2% received. General fund expenditures are 93.4% and Parking Fund expenditures are 95.7% for 100% of the fiscal year. NOTED: StephBurrell, City Manager Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director ]dc� h:\user\michele\revexp.doc REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 2,840,902.00 .00 2,769,158.30 71,743.70 97.5 3102 CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 195,250.00 .00 196,426.52 1,176.52- 100.6 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 130,573.00 5,084.51- 70,931.75 59,641.25 54.3 3106 SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 23,429.00 6,285.32 23,778.71 349.71- 101.5 3107 TRANSFER TAX 70,000.00 8,895.08 77,658.88 7,658.88- 110.9 3108 SALES TAX 1,640,000.00 209,325.83 1,630,699.57 9,300.43 99.4 3109 1/2 CENT SALES TX EXT 69,429.00 7,516.68 68,991.60 437.40 99.4 3110 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 155,000.00 .00 144,075.82 10,924.18 93.0 3111 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 48,644.00 .00 46,885.33 1,758.67 96.4 3112 GAS FRANCHISE 33,000.00 .00 34,447.27 1,447.27- 104.4 3113 REFUSE FRANCHISE 163,000.00 .00 118,796.34 44,203.66 72.9 3114 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 330,000.00 .00 357,844.60 27,844.60- 108.4 3115 BUSINESS LICENSE 467,000.00 95,266.81 523,465.62 56,465.62- 112.1 3120 UTILITY USER TAX 1,900,000.00 116,345.89 1,869,452.89 30,547.11 98.4 TAXES 8,066,227.00 438,551.10 7,932,613.20 133,613.80 98.3 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 DOG LICENSES 12,601.00 252.50 13,281.65 680.65- 105.4 3203 BICYCLE LICENSES 200.00 6.60 111.50 88.50 55.8 3204 BUILDING PERMITS 403,154.00 49,233.29 224,065.24 179,088.76 55.6 3205 ELECTRIC PERMITS 28,568.00 13,003.20 31,776.95 3,208.95- 111.2 3206 PLUMBING PERMITS 26,520.00 4,998.10 21,113.10 5,406.90 79.6 3207 OCCUPANCY PERMITS 6,500.00 308.70 6,186.30 313.70 95.2 3209 GARAGE SALES 130.00 3.40 107.70 22.30 82.8 3211 BANNER PERMITS 4,000.00 203.80 4,664.45 664.45- 116.6 3212 ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 104.00 .00 55.10 48.90 53.0 3213 ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 3,000.00 108.80 2,202.60 797.40 73.4 3214 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 600.00 154.40 733.40 133.40- 122.2 3215 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 2,000.00 33.00 785.00 1,215.00 39.3 3216 SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 130.00 .00 32.50 97.50 25.0 3217 OPEN FIRE PERMIT 233.00 47.50 757.75 524.75- 325.2 3218 AUTO REPAIR PERMIT 1,544.00 64.22 1,799.57 255.57- 116.6 LICENSES AND PERMITS 489,284.00 68,417.51 307,672.81 181,611.19 62.9 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 110,000.00 13,677.73 121,826.51 11,826.51- 110.8 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 165,655.00 14,841.55 139,651.10 26,003.90 84.3 3402 RENTS & CONCESSIONS 2,000.00 211.01 1,600.12 399.88 80.0 3403 PIER REVENUE 10,500.00 1,256.50 10,034.60 465.40 95.6 3404 COMM CTR LEASES 97,020.00 8,086.00 97,013.00 7.00 100.0 3405 COMM CTR RENTALS 40,000.00 2,880.00 24,755.50 15,244.50 61.9 3406 COMM CTR THEATRE 25,000.00 173.80 22,415.80 2,584.20 89.7 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) . ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 2 BALANCE % COL 3411 OTHER FACILITIES 35,000.00 230.00 16,270.50 18,729.50 46.5 3412 TENNIS COURTS 12,000.00 1,194.75 10,801.25 1,198.75 90.0 3418 SPECIAL EVENTS 64,000.00 15,234.14 71,369.23 7,369.23- 111.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 451,175.00 44,107.75 393,911.10 57,263.90 87.3 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 300.00 .00 293.98 6.02 98.0 3505 IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 675,830.00 61,084.38 725,956.54 50,126.54- 107.4 3507 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 9,800.00 .00 4,624.92 5,175.08 47.2 3508 MANDATED COSTS 32,352.00 10,470.00 44,671.00 12,319.00- 138.1 3509 HOMEOWNR PROP TX RELIEF 60,459.00 10,083.63 61,893.32 1,434.32- 102.4 3510 POST 8,000.00 .00 19,474.56 11,474.56- 243.4 3511 STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 3,410.00 655.00 3,408.00 2.00 99.9 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 790,151.00 82,293.01 860,322.32 70,171.32- 108.9 3800 CURRENT. SERVICE. CHARGES 3801 RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION12,280.00 1,631.70 14,607.80 2,327.80- 119.0 3802 SIGN REVIEW 2,600.00 176.20 2,193.05 406.95 84.3 3803 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 3,840.00 1,018.25 3,607.05 232.95 93.9 3805 CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 3,470.00 .00 2,102.80 1,367.20 60.6 3806 BOARD OF APPEALS 1,000.00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 3808 ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 6,095.00 1,018.25 8,027.00 1,932.00- 131.7 3809 TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 4,037.00 .00 3,024.00 1,013.00 74.9 3810 FINAL MAP REVIEW 1,482.00 1,238.50 2,225.60 743.60- 150.2 3811 ZONE CHANGE/GEN PLAN AMEND 6,606.00 .00 6,606.25 .25-'100.0 3812 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 16,700.00 2,312.30 26,612.20 9,912.20- 159.4 3813 PLAN CHECK FEES 322,523.00 6,746.60 115,271.71 207,251.29 35.7 3814 PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 1,010.00 175.50 1,002.00 8.00 99.2 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 9,200.00 600.10 7,664.89 1,535.11 83.3 3818 POLICE SERVICES 4,000.00 166.50 5,846.80 1,846.80- 146.2 3819 JAIL SERVICES 4,000.00 1,650.00 8,435.74 4,435.74- 210.9 3821 FINGERPRINT SERVICE 6,000.00 620.30 6,763.90 763.90- 112.7 3823 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 46,000.00 4,977.40 32,492.03 13,507.97 70.6 3824 VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES .00 .00 .00 .00 3825 PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 47.00 15.75 63.00 16.00- 134.0 3827 LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 5,988.00 .00 5,988.00 .00 100.0 3831 STREET CUT INSPECTION 15,000.00 1,116.60 15,632.50 632.50- 104.2 3833 RECREATION SERVICE CHARGES .00 55.09 3,122.09 3,122.09- *** 3834 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 20,000.00 388.90 24,371.55 4,371.55- 121.9 3837 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 1,200.00 70.00 1,100.80 99.20 91.7 3838 SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIONS 100.00 158.00 628.60 528.60- 628.6 3839 PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 500.00 54.60 1,265.14 765.14- 253.0 3840 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 68,000.00 8,809.47 80,883.06 12,883.06- 118.9 3841 POLICE TOWING 23,000.00 3,040.10 24,916.80 1,916.80- 108.3 3857 PKG PLAN APPLICATION 8,074.00 .00 6,048.00 2,026.00 74.9 3858 TENANT REFUSE BILLING 216.00 10.90 208.00 8.00 96.3 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 3 BALANCE % COL 3859 REFUSE LIEN FEE 900.00 10,435.86- 900.00 .00 100.0 3861 HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT .00 .00 .00 .00 3862 ALARM PERMIT FEE 2,000.00 132.00 2,177.10 177.10- 108.9 3863 FALSE ALARM FEE 1,000.00 122.20 987.46 12.54 98.7 3864 C.U.P./FENCES/WALLS 208.00 .00 .00 208.00 0.0 3866 NONCONFORMING REMODELS 7,345.00 .00 9,557.50 2,212.50- 130.1 3867 PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 11,347.00 2,521.50 12,607.50 1,260.50- 111.1 3868 PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 15,060.00 2,535.00 18,923.15 3,863.15- 125.7 3869 2ND PARTY RESPONSE 300.00 .00 152.05 147.95 50.7 3878 COMML BLDG/APT INSPECT 400.00 .00 577.80 177.80- 144.5 3881 ROLLER HOCKEY RINK RENT INS .00 249.75- 45.50 45.50- *** 3882 SPEC EVENT SECURITY/FIRE 6,200.00 1,606.40 5,788.90 411.10 93.4 3883 FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION 488.00 .00 495.40 7.40- 101.5 3884 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT .00 .00 1,125.40 1,125.40- *** 3888 PLANNING COMM APPEALS 358.00 .00 363.40 5.40- 101.5 3890 300'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 1,640.00 213.75 1,620.78 17.22 98.8 3893 CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 147,100.00 9,621.38 134,797.29 12,302.71 91.6 3894 OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS 45,000.00 3,495.00 45,035.76 35.76- 100.1 3895 ANIMAL TRAP FEE 47.00 .00 47.40 .40- 100.9 3896 MAILING FEE .00 .00 5.00 5.00- *** 3897 ADMIN FEE, INS CERTIF 150.00 129.40 570.54- 720.54 380.4- 3898 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 347.00 .00 .00 347.00 0.0 3899 C.U.P. MINOR AMEND. 305.00 .00 304.50 .50 99.8 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 833,163.00 45,742.03 645,651.71 187,511.29 77.5 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 5,000.00 .00 16,223.70 11,223.70- 324.5 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 34,862.00 2,606.60 31,634.62 3,227.38 90.7 3903 CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 5,150.00 8,000.00 18,575.26 13,425.26- 360.7 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 900.00 217.19 11,195.16 10,295.16- 999.9+ 3915 RETIREMENT SURPLUS FUNDS 476,588.00 48,584.89 487,838.06 11,250.06- 102.4 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND .00 21,083.51 40,581.60 40,581.60- *** 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1,310,968.00 108,934.70 1,310,968.00 .00 100.0 OTHER REVENUE 1,833,468.00 189,426.89 1,917,016.40 83,548.40- 104.6 REVENUE CONTROL 12,573,468.00 882,216.02 12,179,014.05 394,453.95 96.9 GENERAL FUND 12,573,468.00 882,216.02 12,179,014.05 394,453.95 96.9 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 4 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 594,249.00 .00 553,201.03 41,047.97 93.1 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 7,156.00 .00 11,167.13 4,011.13- 156.1 3105 ASSESSMENT REBATES 4,000.00- 759.60- 6,741.45- 2,741.45 168.5 TAXES 597,405.00 759.60- 557,626.71 39,778.29 93.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP REVENUE CONTROL LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 56,328.00 3,597.69 38,927.34 17,400.66 69.1 .00 .00 550.00 550.00- *** 653,733.00 2,838.09 597,104.05 56,628.95 91.3 653,733.00 2,838.09 597,104.05 56,628.95 91.3 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 5 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 39,892.00 1,888.02 32,392.52 7,499.48 81.2 3413 PARKING LOT LEASE 230,000.00 31,569.44 213,185.00 16,815.00 92.7 3420 OTHER INTEREST INCOME 19,560.00 1,608.10 19,375.24 184.76 99.1 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 289,452.00 35,065.56 264,952.76 24,499.24 91.5 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3822 D.E.C. BANNER PROGRAM .00 .00 .00 .00 REVENUE CONTROL 289,452.00 35,065.56 264,952.76 24,499.24 91.5 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 289,452.00 35,065.56 264,952.76 24,499.24 91.5 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 110 PARKING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 6 BALANCE % COL 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3302 COURT FINES/PARKING 970,967.00 90,825.40 1,072,961.51 101,994.51- 110.5 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 14,643.00 981.85 9,847.50 4,795.50 67.3 3407 PARKING LOT RENTAL .00 .00 .00 .00 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 14,643.00 981.85 9,847.50 4,795.50 67.3 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 PARKING METERS 676,500.00 71,870.64 708,137.80 31,637.80- 104.7 3843 PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 224,000.00 10,624.60 230,955.30 6,955.30- 103.1 3844 DAILY PARKING PERMITS 972.00 132.00 702.85 269.15 72.3 3848 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 500.00 33.20 505.20 5.20- 101.0 3849 GUEST PERMITS 1,400.00 205.70 1,486.15 86.15- 106.2 3850 CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 2,000.00 265.20 2,445.20 445.20- 122.3 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 905,372.00 83,131.34 944,232.50 38,860.50- 104.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN 583.00 97.15 583.00 .00 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 1,891,565.00 175,035.74 2,027,624.51 136,059.51- 107.2 PARKING FUND 1,891,565.00 175,035.74 2,027,624.51 136,059.51- 107.2 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3,549.00 236.92 PAGE 7 BALANCE % COL 2,588.70 960.30 72.9 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 72,041.00 6,346.95 70,989.83 1,051.17 98.5 3502 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 154,606.00 13,942.18 154,447.33 158.67 99.9 3503 SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 .00 100.0 3512 SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 110,341.00 9,698.48 110,049.28 291.72 99.7 3522 TDA ARTICLE 3/LOCAL 7,656.00 .00 .00 7,656.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 348,644.00 29,987.61 339,486.44 9,157.56 97.4 REVENUE CONTROL 352,193.00 30,224.53 342,075.14 10,117.86 97.1 STATE GAS TAX FUND 352,193.00 30,224.53 342,075.14 10,117.86 97.1. REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 117 AB939 FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3860 AB939 SURCHARGE REVENUE CONTROL AB939 FUND PAGE 8 BALANCE % COL 5,279.00 578.82 5,221.05 57.95 98.9 56,667.00 .00 46,290.49 10,376.51 81.7 61,946.00 578.82 51,511.54 10,434.46 83.2 61,946.00 578.82 51,511.54 10,434.46 83.2 REVPRIN2 _ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 9 07/16/97 11:48:09 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 119 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 243,920.00 24,292.44 243,919.05 .95 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 243,920.00 24,292.44 243,919.05 .95 100.0 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND 243,920.00 24,292.44 243,919.05 .95 100.0 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3601 COUNTY AID TO CITIES REVENUE CONTROL COUNTY GAS TAX FUND PAGE 10 BALANCE % COL 4,042.00 318.62 3,574.79 467.21 88.4 28,720.00 .00 .00 28,720.00 0.0 32,762.00 318.62 3,574.79 29,187.21 10.9 32,762.00 318.62 3,574.79 29,187.21 10.9 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 11 07/16/97 11:48:09 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME .00 .00 .00 .00 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3606 LA CO PRKS/PIER RENOVATION 2,273,078.00 .00 .00 2,273,078.00 0.0 3608 MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION 17,164.00 .00 .00 17,164.00 0.0 3610 CO. LIFEGUARD AGREEMENT 1,200,000.00 .00 .00 1,200,000.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3,490,242.00 .00 .00 3,490,242.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 3,490,242.00 .00 .00 3,490,242.00 0.0 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 3,490,242.00 .00 .00 3,490,242.00 0.0 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3116 PARK REC FACILITY TAX 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU REVENUE CONTROL PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND PAGE 12 BALANCE % COL 59,500.00 3,500.00 45,500.00 14,000.00 76.5 4,423.00 560.89 4,369.19 53.81 98.8 207,920.00 .00 36,178.00 171,742.00 17.4 271,843.00 4,060.89 86,047.19 185,795.81 31.7 271,843.00 4,060.89 86,047.19 185,795.81 31.7 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 13 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 117,568.00 6,584.07 98,770.33 18,797.67 84.0 REVENUE CONTROL 117,568.00 6,584.07 98,770.33 18,797.67 84.0 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 117,568.00 6,584.07 98,770.33 18,797.67 84.0 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 14 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 9,507.00 660.12 7,545.88 1,961.12 79.4 REVENUE CONTROL 9,507.00 660.12 7,545.88 1,961.12 79.4 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 9,507.00 660.12 7,545.88 1,961.12 79.4 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 15 BALANCE % COL 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3720 AMER DISAB ACT 273,095.00 .00 3,344.00 269,751.00 1.2 REVENUE CONTROL 273,095.00 .00 3,344.00 269,751.00 1.2 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 273,095.00 .00 3,344.00 269,751.00 1.2 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 16 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3117 PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 205,408.00 .00 175,298.00 30,110.00 85.3 3121 SUBREGIONAL INCENTIVES 23,000.00 .00 13,343.91 9,656.09 58.0 TAXES 228,408.00 .00 188,641.91 39,766.09 82.6 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 4,900.00 444.63 3,996.69 903.31 81.6 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3854 FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11,500.00 .00 9,034.39 2,465.61 78.6 3855 BUS PASSES 2,400.00 149.60 1,692.40 707.60 70.5 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 13,900.00 149.60 10,726.79 3,173.21 77.2 REVENUE CONTROL 247,208.00 594.23 203,365.39 43,842.61 82.3 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 247,208.00 594.23 203,365.39 43,842.61 82.3 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3118 PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME REVENUE CONTROL PROPOSITION 'C FUND PAGE 17 BALANCE % COL 168,800.00 10,733.00 150,268.00 18,532.00 89.0 17,438.00 1,664.53 15,769.59 1,668.41 90.4 186,238.00 12,397.53 166,037.59 20,200.41 89.2 186,238.00 12,397.53 166,037.59 20,200.41 89.2 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 150 GRANTS FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 18 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3541 ST/LOC TRANS PROG (SLTPP) 25,811.00 .00 25,811.00 .00 100.0 3545 COASTAL CONSERVANCY GRANT 200,000.00 .00 .00 200,000.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 225,811.00 .00 25,811.00 200,000.00 11.4 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3725 F.E.M.A. PIER REPAIR 90,000.00 .00 2,661.00 87,339.00 3.0 3730 STPL LOWER PIER PROJ 286,837.00 .00 .00 286,837.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 376,837.00 .00 2,661.00 374,176.00 0.7 REVENUE CONTROL 602,648.00 .00 28,472.00 574,176.00 4.7 GRANTS FUND 602,648.00 .00 28,472.00 574,176.00 4.7 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 19 BALANCE % COL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 SPEED ENF/EDUCATION PROG 49,359.00 .00 40,453.88 8,905.12 82.0 REVENUE CONTROL 49,359.00 .00 40,453.88 8,905.12 82.0. OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND 49,359.00 .00 40,453.88 8,905.12 82.0 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3538 AQMD EMISSION CTL AB276 REVENUE CONTROL AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 1,424.00 20,200.00 21,624.00 21,624.00 58.76 991.64 4,712.23 14,727.13 4,770.99 15,718.77 4,770.99 15,718.77 PAGE 20 BALANCE % COL 432.36 69.6 5,472.87 72.9 5,905.23 72.7 5,905.23 72.7 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 21 07/16/97 11:48:09 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3135 C.O.P.S. ALLOCATION 43,470.00 .00 43,470.07 .07- 100.0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 1,223.00 89.97 1,515.44 292.44- 123.9 REVENUE CONTROL 44,693.00 89.97 44,985.51 292.51- 100.7 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 44,693.00 89.97 44,985.51 292.51- 100.7 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME REVENUE CONTROL CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND PAGE 22 BALANCE % COL 1,500.00 .00 1,333.65 166.35 88.9 4.00 .00 4.19 .19- 104.8 1,504.00 .00 1,337.84 166.16 89.0 1,504.00 .00 1,337.84 166.16 89.0 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 160 SEWER FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.07. OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANCE PAGE 23 BALANCE % COL 168,166.00 10,311.41 133,806.73 34,359.27 79.6 10,000.00 .00 7,967.67 2,032.33 79.7 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 5,000.00 2,437.48 31,329.07 26,329.07- 626.6 3829 SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 325.00 .00 324.80 .20 99.9 3832 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 600.00 165.20 1,643.95 1,043.95- 274.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 5,925.00 2,602.68 33,297.82 27,372.82- 562.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS .00 .00 4,738.94- 4,738.94 *** 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 800,000.00 66,666.63 800,000.00 .00 100.0 OTHER REVENUE 800,000.00 66,666.63 795,261.06 4,738.94 99.4 REVENUE CONTROL 984,091.00 79,580.72 970,333.28 13,757.72 98.6 SEWER FUND 984,091.00 79,580.72 970,333.28 13,757.72 98.6 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 24 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3304 FORFEITED FUNDS 10,000.00 .00 2,744.91 7,255.09 27.4 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 19,154.00 856.08 12,311.43 6,842.57 64.3 REVENUE CONTROL 29,154.00 856.08 15,056.34 14,097.66 51.6 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 29,154.00 856.08 15,056.34 14,097.66 51.6 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND CITY OF HERMOSA_BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 25 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 8,770.00 676.07 6,952.48 1,817.52 79.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 FIRE FLOW FEE 66,131.00 3,023.00 59,738.50 6,392.50 90.3 REVENUE CONTROL 74,901.00 3,699.07 66,690.98 8,210.02 89.0 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 74,901.00 3,699.07 66,690.98 8,210.02 89.0 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 705 INSURANCE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3880 INSURANCE SERVICE CHARGES 936,325.00 78,028.00 PAGE 26 BALANCE % COL 936,325.00 .00 100.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR .00 5,028.07 5,054.07 5,054.07- *** 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS .00 .00 283.19 283.19- *** 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 243,919.00 24,292.45 243,919.01 .01- 100.0 OTHER REVENUE 243,919.00 29,320.52 249,256.27 5,337.27- 102.2 REVENUE CONTROL INSURANCE FUND 1,180,244.00 107,348.52 1,185,581.27 5,337.27- 100.5 1,180,244.00 107,348.52 1,185,581.27 5,337.27- 100.5 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 27 07/16/97 11:48:09 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3889 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 496,586.00 41,384.00 496,586.00 .00 100.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND .00 .00 83,151.93 83,151.93- *** 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 38,000.00 3,166.63 38,000.00 .00 100.0 OTHER REVENUE 38,000.00 3,166.63 121,151.93 83,151.93- 318.8 REVENUE CONTROL 534,586.00 44,550.63 617,737.93 83,151.93- 115.6 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 534,586.00 44,550.63 617,737.93 83,151.93- 115.6 REVPRIN2 07/16/97 11:48:09 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 28 BALANCE % COL REVENUE CONTROL 24,217,544.00 1,415,762.64 19,261,254.07 4,956,289.93 79.5 GRAND TOTALS 24,217,544.00 1,415,762.64 19,261,254.07 4,956,289.93 79.5 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1101. CITY COUNCIL 1101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 21,922.00 1,826.31 21,792.30 .00 129.70 99.4 1101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,425.00 .00 .00 .00 1,425.00 0.0 1101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 18,000.00 1,500.00 18,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 1101-4180 RETIREMENT 4,855.00 391.02 4,676.30 .00 178.70 96.3 1101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 20,924.00 2,246.81 22,647.18 .00 1,723.18- 108.2 1101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 802.00 66.88 800.80 .00 1.20 99.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 67,928.00 6,031.02 67,916.58 .00 11.42 100.0 1101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 4,539.00 .00 3,940.47 .00 598.53 86.8 1101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1101-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 16.52 346.68 .00 46.68- 115.6 1101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,000.00 630.94 3,995.23 1,497.95 506.82 91.6 1101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 7,040.00 .00 5,681.00 .00 1,359.00 80.7 1101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 6,320.00 844.31 3,093.26 .00 3,226.74 48.9 1101-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 2,035.00 .00 1,638.48 .00 396.52 80.5 1101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 38,653.00 3,222.00 38,653.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 60,348.00 4,713.77 53,407.65 1,497.95 5,442.40 91.0 1101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 325.00 .00 324.74 .00 .26 99.9 CITY COUNCIL 133,140.00 10,744.79 125,589.44 1,497.95 6,052.61 95.5 1121 CITY CLERK 1121-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1121-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 40,854.00 3,403.42 40,611.72 .00 242.28 99.4 1121-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,656.00 .00 .00 .00 2,656.00 0.0 1121-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 34,002.00 2,263.50 20,818.00 .00 13,184.00 61.2 1121-4180 RETIREMENT 7,939.00 675.76 7,749.36 .00 189.64 97.6 1121-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,973.00 445.75 5,221.26 .00 248.26- 105.0 1121-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 990.00 82.16 890.60 .00 99.40 90.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 91,414.00 6,870.59 75,290.94 .00 16,123.06 82.4 1121-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1121-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 22,582.00 69.77 16,940.43 .00 5,641.57 75.0 1121-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3,000.00 .00 2,990.64 .00 9.36 99.7 CONTRACT SERVICES 25,582.00 69.77 19,931.07 .00 5,650.93 77.9 1121-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1121-4304 TELEPHONE 650.00 36.97 555.87 .00 94.13 85.5 1121-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,750.00 113.14 2,875.86 .00 1,874.14 60.5 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1121-4315 MEMBERSHIP 250.00 .00 259.00 .00 9.00- 103.6 1121-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 1121-4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 9,500.00 95.00- 7,870.94 .00 1,629.06 82.9 1121-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 2,588.00 212.00 2,588.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 19,238.00 267.11 14,149.67 .00 5,088.33 73.6 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,200.00 .00 985.13 .00 214.87 82.1 1121-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 5,253.00 2,696.19 2,696.19 .00 2,556.81 51.3 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 6,453.00 2,696.19 3,681.32 .00 2,771.68 57.0 CITY CLERK 142,687.00 9,903.66 113,053.00 .00 29,634.00 79.2 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 1131-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1131-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 172,244.00 59,013.47 180,885.56 .00 8,641.56- 105.0 1131-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1131-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 17.69 285.35 .00 35.35- 114.1 1131-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 150.00 6.00 77.69 .00 72.31 51.8 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 400.00 23.69 363.04 .00 36.96 90.8 CITY ATTORNEY 172,644.00 59,037.16 181,248.60 .00 8,604.60- 105.0 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 1132-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1132-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,158.00 212.48 2,752.32 .00 405.68 87.2 1132-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1132-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 77,239.00 13,375.00 75,364.21 .00 1,874.79 97.6 1132-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1132-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 16.72 248.78 .00 51.22 82.9 1132-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 520.00 .00 552.74 .00 32.74- 106.3 1132-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 .00 100.00 .00 200.00 33.3 1132-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 726.00 .00 .00 .00 726.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,846.00 16.72 901.52 .00 944.48 48.8 CITY PROSECUTOR 82,243.00 13,604.20 79,018.05 .00 3,224.95 96.1 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 12,003.00 1,355.62 12,976.53 .00 973.53- 108.1 1141-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 12.06 12.06 .00 12.06- *** 1141-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,068.00 .00 .00 .00 1,068.00 0.0 1141-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,464.00 1,325.50 15,906.00 .00 558.00 96.6 1141-4180 RETIREMENT 4,396.00 346.44 3,731.89 .00 664.11 84.9 1141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,889.00 522.93 5,798.53 .00 90.47 98.5 1141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 477.00 39.06 419.34 .00 57.66 87.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 40,297.00 3,601.61 38,844.35 .00 1,452.65 96.4 1141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8,736.00 208.33 4,498.60 .00 4,237.40 51.5 1141-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1141-4304 TELEPHONE 588.00 51.72 781.61 .00 193.61- 132.9 1141-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,239.00 123.17 1,272.21 .00 33.21- 102.7 1141-4315 MEMBERSHIP 75.00 .00 75.00 .00 .00 100.0 1141-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 789.00 170.00 399.00 21.00 369.00 53.2 1141-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 2,000.00 163.00 2,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,691.00 507.89 4,527.82 21.00 142.18 97.0 CITY TREASURER 53,724.00 4,317.83 47,870.77 21.00 5,832.23 89.1 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1201 CITY MANAGER 1201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 120,418.00 10,877.01 125,920.38 .00 5,502.38- 104.6 1201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,186.00 .00 5,687.09 .00 2,498.91 69.5 1201-4180 RETIREMENT 15,275.00 1,264.41 14,578.16 .00 '696.84 95.4 1201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 13,735.00 1,041.19 12,139.60 .00 1,595.40 88.4 1201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,676.00 148.62 1,799.21 .00 123.21- 107.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 159,290.00 13,331.23 160,124.44 .00 834.44- 100.5 1201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 583.00 49.50 166.82 .00 416.18 28.6 1201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1201-4304 TELEPHONE 680.00 77.83 1,003.73 .00 323.73- 147.6 1201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,350.00 114.33 1,426.21 .00 76.21- 105.6 1201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,275.00 .00 982.92 .00 292.08 77.1 1201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,000.00 30.00 3,373.99 .00 373.99- 112.5 1201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,571.00 543.00 6,571.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 12,876.00 765.16 13,357.85 .00 481.85- 103.7 1201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 CITY MANAGER 173,249.00 14,145.89 173,649.11 .00 400.11- 100.2 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 233,862.00 16,101.90 204,721.95 .00 29,140.05 87.5 1202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 3,165.00 12.06 2,335.70 .00 829.30 73.8 1202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 15,333.00 1,096.48 11,387.68 .00 3,945.32 74.3 1202-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 709.49 4,538.49 .00 4,538.49- *** 1202-4180 RETIREMENT 31,975.00 2,127.81 26,539.83 .00 5,435.17 83.0 1202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,079.00 1,666.17 19,623.09 .00 1,455.91 93.1 1202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 747.00 112.35 1,111.84 .00 364.84- 148.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 306,161.00 21,826.26 270,258.58 .00 35,902.42 88.3 1202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 4 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 97,483.00 4,921.40 64,252.97 .00 33,230.03 65.9 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4304 TELEPHONE 2,630.00 134.95 2,143.54 .00 486.46 81.5 1202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,610.00 508.35 7,489.65 .00 879.65- 113.3 1202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 250.00 .00 240.00 .00 10.00 96.0 1202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,760.00 .00 1,795.88 250.00 1,714.12 54.4 1202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 3,963.00 333.00 3,963.00 .00 .00 100.0 1202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,605.00 968.00 11,605.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 28,818.00 1,944.30 27,237.07 250.00 1,330.93 95.4 1202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 250.00 .00 204.59 .00 45.41 81.8 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 432,712.00 28,691.96 361,953.21 250.00 70,508.79. 83.7 1203 PERSONNEL 1203-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1203-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 60,237.00 1,701.73 55,986.88 .00 4,250.12 92.9 1203-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,693.00 .00 6,594.40 .00 2,901.40- 178.6 1203-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 .00 75.65 .00 75.65- *** 1203-4180 RETIREMENT 7,776.00 219.90 9,005.45 .00 1,229.45- 115.8 1203-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,213.00 130.27 18,278.84 .00 4,065.84- 128.6 1203-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS .00 .00 1.18 .00 1.18- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 85,919.00 2,051.90 89,942.40 .00 4,023.40- 104.7 1203-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1203-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 18,243.00 3,655.69 18,479.66 464.85 701.51- 103.8 1203-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 19,243.00 3,655.69 18,479.66 464.85 298.49 98.4 1203-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1203-4304 TELEPHONE 1,350.00 67.37 1,244.27 .00 105.73 92.2 1203-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,000.00 190.70 3,284.21 .00 715.79 82.1 1203-4315 MEMBERSHIP 735.00 .00 1,042.00 .00 307.00- 141.8 1203-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 10,096.00 .00 5,594.25 100.00 4,401.75 56.4 1203-4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 25,721.00 400.00 8,445.00 .00 17,276.00 32.8 1203-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 4,939.00 407.00 4,939.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 46,841.00 1,065.07 24,548.73 100.00 22,192.27 52.6 1203-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1203-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** PERSONNEL 152,003.00 6,772.66 132,970.79 564.85 18,467.36 87.9 1206 DATA PROCESSING 1206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 39,744.00 3,312.00 39,744.00 .00 .00 100.0 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE '5 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,583.00 .00 .00 .00 2,583.00 0.0 1206-4180 RETIREMENT 5,313.00 427.94 5,135.30 .00 177.70 96.7 1206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,031.00 168.15 1,957.40 .00 73.60 96.4 1206-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 576.00 48.02 576.24 .00 .24- 100.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 50,247.00 3,956.11 47,412.94 .00 2,834.06 94.4 1206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 44,057.00 331.00 27,787.83 150.00 16,119.17 63.4 1206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1206-4304 TELEPHONE 4,900.00 210.06 2,979.94 .00 1,920.06 60.8 1206-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,400.00 313.30 3,705.98 135.31 558.71 87.3 1206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,700.00 261.13 1,595.22 .00 1,104.78 59.1 1206-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 .00 50.00 .00 250.00 16.7 1206-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 1206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,755.00 149.00 1,755.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 15,055.00 933.49 10,086.14 135.31 4,833.55 67.9 1206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 14,000.00 5,508.58 12,005.70 1,601.56 392.74 97.2 1206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 32,872.00 .00 28,752.49 .00 4,119.51 87.5 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 46,872.00 5,508.58 40,758.19 1,601.56 4,512.25 90.4 DATA PROCESSING 156,231.00 10,729.18 126,045.10 1,886.87 28,299.03 81.9 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 1208-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1208-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 38,623.00 3,218.60 38,405.40 .00 217.60 99.4 1208-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 153.19 .00 153.19- *** 1208-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,511.00 .00 1,596.92 .00 914.08 63.6 1208-4180 RETIREMENT 5,164.00 415.90 4,962.60 .00 201.40 96.1 1208-4188 ; EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,301.00 189.07 2,277.16 .00 23.84 99.0 1208-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 560.00 46.66 582.19 .00 22.19- 104.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 49,159.00 3,870.23 47,977.46 .00 1,181.54 97.6 1208-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1208-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,794.00 1,301.54 13,549.13 .00 755.13- 105.9 1208-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1208-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 4.08- 1,016.06 .00 766.06- 406.4 1208-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 27,753.00- 1,792.66- 34,340.21- 435.17 6,152.04 122.2 1208-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 149.00 .00 149.00 .00 .00 100.0 1208-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,686.00 135.00 1,686.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 25,668.00- 1,661.74- 31,489.15- 435.17 5,385.98 121.0 1208-5400 1208-5401 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 1208-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 405.00 .00 404.58 .00 .42 99.9 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 6 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1208-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 10,115.00 2,684.41 11,152.34 .00 1,037.34- 110.3 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 46,805.00 6,194.44 41,594.36 435.17 4,775.47 89.8 1214 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1214-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 1,425.00 .00 .00 .00 1,425.00 0.0 1235 CABLE FRANCHISE PMT/H.B.S.D. 1235-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1235-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 50,000.00 .00 50,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 BUDGET TRANSFERS OUT 1,288,422.00 115,348.67 1,288,421.06 .00 .94 100.0 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,528,796.00 192,179.30 2,344,866.64 .00 183,929.36 92.7 2101-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 19,920.00 1,660.00 20,870.00 .00 950.00- 104.8 2101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 225,000.00 22,599.38 190,383.16 .00 34,616.84 84.6 2101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 163,185.00 9,477.42 237,234.03 .00 74,049.03- 145.4 2101-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 15,055.00 527.48 16,707.81 .00 1,652.81- 111.0 2101-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 9,053.00 417.85 6,824.19 .00 2,228.81 75.4 2101-4118 TRAINING OFFICER 4,500.00 840.36 5,076.94 .00 576.94- 112.8 2101-4180 RETIREMENT 563,391.00 43,690.52 584,400.67 .00 21,009.67- 103.7 2101-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 52,560.00 2,852.73 48,623.30 .00 3,936.70 92.5 2101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 215,151.00 15,883.69 191,640.06 .00 23,510.94 89.1 2101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 22,472.00 1,755.53 22,401.61 .00 70.39 99.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 3,819,083.00 291,884.26 3,669,028.41 .00 150,054.59 96.1 2101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 83,989.00 16,291.36 61,576.41 4,862.39- 27,274.98 67.5 2101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,000.00 68.15 1,436.15 .00 563.85 71.8 CONTRACT SERVICES 85,989.00 16,359.51 63,012.56 4,862.39- 27,838.83 67.6 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4304 TELEPHONE 39,000.00 4,748.99 43,578.51 .00 4,578.51- 111.7 2101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 30,190.00 3,009.42 34,589.88 584.55 4,984.43- 116.5 2101-4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 8,517.00 1,396.09 6,675.59 .00 1,841.41 78.4 2101-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,630.00 486.54 2,393.46 1,167.35 69.19 98.1 2101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,600.00 1,352.60 4,774.75 75.00 249.75- 105.4 2101-4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 10,000.00 40.00 23,592.11 .00 13,592.11- 235.9 2101-4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 3,410.00 150.30 2,930.47 .00 479.53 85.9 2101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 685.00 .00 52.18 .00 632.82 7.6 2101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 13,550.00 746.51 12,589.27 50.00 910.73 93.3 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # 2101-4395 2101-4396 2101-5400 2101-5401 2101-5402 2101-5403 2102 2102-4200 2102-4201 2200 2201 2201-4100 2201-4102 2201-4106 2201-4108 2201-4111 2201-4112 2201-4119 2201-4180 2201-4187 2201-4188 2201-4189 2201-4200 2201-4201 2201-4251 2201-4300 2201-4304 2201-4305 ' 2201-4309 2201-4315 2201-4317 2201-4395 2201-4396 DESCRIPTION EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES INSURANCE USER CHARGES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 VEHICLES EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE POLICE CROSSING GUARD CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE FIRE FIRE PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES REGULAR OVERTIME FLSA OVERTIME ACCRUAL CASH IN PART TIME/TEMPORARY FITNESS INCENTIVE RETIREMENT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT CONTRACT SERVICES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER TELEPHONE OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MEMBERSHIP CONFERENCE/TRAINING EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES INSURANCE USER CHARGES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED APPROP 252,994.00 420,857.00 787,433.00 1,724.00 22,485.00 .00 24,209.00 4,716,714.00 45,803.00 1,116,747.00 145,074.00 74,254.00 71,746.00 8,640.00 9,200.00 293,213.00 17,152.00 144,151.00 8,260.00 1,888,437.00 21,743.00 2,343.00 24,086.00 7,185.00 4,994.00 11,322.00 2,175.00 7,400.00 47,361.00 123,366.00 203,803.00 JUNE EXPEND 21,081.00 35,076.00 68,087.45 .00 2,952.00 .00 2,952.00 379,283.22 4,862.39 1996-97 EXPEND 252,994.00 420,857.00 805,027.22 1,704.89 20,164.50 .00 21,869.39 4,558,937.58 ENCUMB. .00 .00 1,876.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,985.49- 42,530.95 12,996.83 86,063.22 1,082,817.69 8,512.12 148,504.40 5,837.06 81,602.39 45,257.92 123,818.27 2,112.75 13,476.27 .00 9,500.00 20;641.64 257,634.43 450.00 16,307.84 11,525.04 141,729.21 1,061.58 10,776.81 181,461.33 1,886,167.31 2,025.23 10,472.42 .00 .00 2,025.23 10,472.42 645.33 7,649.42 183.01 4,469.97 993.61 9,674.07 125.00 1,657.97 1,187.50 4,368.68 3,944.00 47,361.00 10,286.00 123,366.00 17,364.45 198,547.11 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE %7 BALANCE % USED .00 100.0 .00 100.0 19,471.12- 102.5 19.11 2,320.50 .00 2,339.61 160,761.91 98.9 89.7 90.3 96.6 9,724.78- 121.2 33,929.31 3,430.40- 7,348.39- 52,072.27- 4,836.27- 300.00- 35,578.57 844.16 2,421.79 2,516.81- 2,269.69 97.0 102.4 109.9 172.6 156.0 103.3 87.9 95.1 98.3 130.5 99.9 .00 11,270.58 48.2 .00 2,343.00 0.0 .00 13,613.58 43.5 .00 116.91 699.74 375.00 2,284.10 .00 .00 3,475.75 464.42- 106.5 407.12 91.8 948.19 91.6 142.03 93.5 747.22 89.9 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 1,780.14 99.1 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 4,503.00 505.53 4,541.91 .00 38.91- 100.9 2201-5403 VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4,503.00 505.53 4,541.91 .00 38.91- 100.9 FIRE 2,120,829.00 201,356.54 2,099,728.75 3,475.75 17,624.50 99.2 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3104 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 3104-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3104-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 165,943.00 13,329.36 160,368.79 .00 5,574.21 96.6 3104-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,050.00 34.01 268.41 .00 781.59 25.6 3104-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 10,786.00 .00 2,812.07 .00 7,973.93 26.1 3104-4180 RETIREMENT 22,073.00 1,713.28 20,591.40 .00 1,481.60 93.3 3104-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 16,306.00 1,424.67 16,809.27 .00 503.27- 103.1 3104-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 291.00 16.99 225.16 .00 65.84 77.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 216,449.00 16,518.31 201,075.10 .00 15,373.90 92.9 3104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 134,800.00 22,804.66 134,366.95 .00 433.05 99.7 3104-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 560.00 .00 437.20 .00 122.80 78.1 CONTRACT SERVICES 135,360.00 22,804.66 134,804.15 .00 555.85 99.6 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4303 UTILITIES 6,910.00 .00 7,638.37 .00 728.37- 110.5 3104-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 26,190.00 4,433.33 34,501.40 3,524.80 11,836.20- 145.2 3104-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 19,347.00 1,615.00 19,347.00 .00 .00 100.0 3104-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 48,974.00 4,083.00 48,974.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 101,421.00 10,131.33 110,460.77 3,524.80 12,564.57- 112.4 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 18,000.00 1,279.18 4,384.77 13,181.06 434.17 97.6 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 471,230.00 50,733.48 450,724.79 16,705.86 3,799.35 99.2 4100 PLANNING 4101 PLANNING 4101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 142,400.00 11,562.31 148,772.01 .00 6,372.01- 104.5 4101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 11,051.00 .00 1,092.79 .00 9,958.21 9.9 4101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 7,887.00 1,881.75 7,624.25 .00 262.75 96.7 4101-4180 RETIREMENT 22,515.00 1,831.77 22,167.13 .00 347.87 98.5 4101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 13,243.00 1,089.51 12,854.39 .00 388.61 97.1 4101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,672.00 210.49 2,043.63 .00 371.63- 122.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 198,768.00 16,575.83 194,554.20 .00 4,213.80 97.9 4101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 16,750.00 3,535.23 17,474.53 .00 724.53- 104.3 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 9 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED- JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 1,453.00 .00 .00 .00 1,453.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 18,203.00 3,535.23 17,474.53 .00 728.47 96.0 4101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4101-4304 TELEPHONE 2,100.00 112.31 1,869.76 .00 230.24 89.0 4101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,000.00 188.05 7,204.86 580.22 214.92 97.3 4101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 900.00 .00 1,023.00 .00 123.00- 113.7 4101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,000.00 28.58 631.08 .00 2,368.92 21.0 4101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 8,980.00 752.00 8,980.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 22,980.00 1,080.94 19,708.70 580.22 2,691.08 88.3 4101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 4,277.00 .00 .00 .00 4,277.00 0.0 PLANNING 244,228.00 21,192.00 231,737.43 580.22 11,910.35 95.1 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 BUILDING 4201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 133,245.00 10,824.83 132,667.09 .00 577.91 99.6 4201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 7,975.00 .00 .00 .00 7,975.00 0.0 4201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 8,002.00 1,881.75 7,139.25 .00 862.75 89.2 4201-4180 RETIREMENT 17,487.00 1,432.05 17,055.61 .00 431.39 97.5 4201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12,401.00 949.98 11,730.49 .00 670.51 94.6 4201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,900.00 234.69 2,267.08 .00 367.08- 119.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 181,010.00 15,323.30 170,859.52 .00 10,150.48 94.4 4201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 266,963.00 25,690.70 121,342.95 .00 145,620.05 45.5 4201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** CONTRACT SERVICES 266,963.00 25,690.70 121,342.95 .00 145,620.05 45.5 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4304 TELEPHONE 3,830.00 197.35 3,588.24 .00 241.76 93.7 4201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,000.00 550.80 7,399.51 227.32 2,626.83- 152.5 4201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,000.00 .00 585.00 .00 415.00 58.5 4201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,850.00 85.52 1,300.04 .00 1,549.96 45.6 4201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 9,976.00 835.00 9,976.00 .00 .00 100.0 4201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 9,560.00 793.00 9,560.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 32,216.00 2,461.67 32,408.79 227.32 420.11- 101.3 4201-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 4201-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 139,267.00 307.34 136,654.69 .00 2,612.31 98.1 BUILDING 619,456.00 43,783.01 461,265.95 227.32 157,962.73 74.5 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 10 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 134,185.00 10,360.67 127,437.98 .00 6,747.02 95.0 4202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 166.58 803.58 .00 303.58- 160.7 4202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,510.00 .00 749.59 .00 7,760.41 8.8 4202-4180 RETIREMENT 17,830.00 1,329.69 16,336.60 .00 1,493.40 91.6 4202-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 3,873.00 96.91 4,901.71 .00 1,028.71- 126.6 4202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 16,635.00 1,263.51 15,631.28 .00 1,003.72 94.0 4202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,628.00 124.62 1,526.16 .00 101.84 93.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 183,161.00 13,341.98 167,386.90 .00 15,774.10 91.4 4202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,650.00 85.50 9,025.95 400.00 3,775.95- 166.8 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4303 UTILITIES 79,856.00 13,566.15 86,908.51 .00 7,052.51- 108.8 4202-4304 TELEPHONE 6,100.00 1,159.39 10,134.31 .00 4,034.31- 166.1 4202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,400.00 1,598.29 11,387.48 16.24 2,003.72- 121.3 4202-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8,615.00 4,566.91 21,292.96 3,452.06 16,130.02- 287.2 4202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 500.00 .00 475.00 .00 25.00 95.0 4202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 7,200.00 420.50 6,122.48 249.00 828.52 88.5 4202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 21,799.00 1,812.00 21,799.00 .00 .00 100.0 4202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 89,893.00 7,492.00 89,893.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 223,363.00 30,615.24 248,012.74 3,717.30 28,367.04- 112.7 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,000.00 .00 969.44 215.42 184.86- 118.5 4202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 33,800.00 7,780.76 7,780.76 12,368.42 13,650.82 59.6 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 34,800.00 7,780.76 8,750.20 12,583.84 13,465.96 61.3 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 446,974.00 51,823.48 433,175.79 16,701.14 2,902.93- 100.6 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 75,989.00 6,472.02 77,209.47 .00 1,220.47- 101.6 4204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,082.00 143.59 2,006.51 .00 924.51- 185.4 4204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,939.00 .00 1,987.33 .00 2,951.67 40.2 4204-4180 RETIREMENT 10,159.00 836.27 9,976.52 .00 182.48 98.2 4204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,779.00 869.57 10,878.37 .00 900.63 92.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 103,948.00 8,321.45 102,058.20 .00 1,889.80 98.2 4204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 65,760.00 11,155.00 69,316.15 1,876.35 5,432.50- 108.3 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4303 UTILITIES 101,734.00 8,238.22 91,972.86 .00 9,761.14 90.4 4204-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 26,300.00 2,957.87 28,508.81 .00 2,208.81- 108.4 4204-4321 BUILDING SFTY/SECURITY 2,850.00 107.20 3,475.87 .00 625.87- 122.0 4204-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 13,416.00 1,118.00 13,416.00 .00 .00 100.0 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 11 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 16,828.00 1,406.00 16,828.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 161,128.00 13,827.29 154,201.54 .00 6,926.46 95.7 4204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 3,200.00 .00 3,170.31 .00 29.69 99.1 4204-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 4204-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 2,300.00 .00 .00 .00 2,300.00 0.0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 336,336.00 33,303.74 328,746.20 1,876.35 5,713.45 98.3 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 175,892.00 13,218.96 165,321.47 .00 10,570.53 94.0 4601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 1,027.38- .00 .00 .00 *** 4601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 10,940.00 .00 3,727.56 .00 7,212.44 34.1 4601-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 109,420.00 8,660.61 93,973.73 .00 15,446.27 85.9 4601-4180 RETIREMENT 26,130.00 2,016.89 25,088.16 .00 1,041.84 96.0 4601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 13,547.00 1,222.54 13,243.66 .00 303.34 97.8 4601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 5,940.00 412.94 4,144.83 .00 1,795.17 69.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 341,869.00 24,504.56 305,499.41 .00 36,369.59 89.4 4601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 9,955.00 2,568.93 9,804.19 .00 150.81 98.5 4601-4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 109,800.00 7,362.10 96,156.84 .00 13,643.16 87.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 119,755.00 9,931.03 105,961.03 .00 13,793.97 88.5 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4302 ADVERTISING 15,600.00 4,672.07 15,885.95 5,916.95 6,202.90- 139.8 4601-4304 TELEPHONE 5,300.00 254.14 3,705.56 .00 1,594.44 69.9 4601-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,500.00 603.70 9,606.40 129.92 1,236.32- 114.5 4601-4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 18,785.00 1,703.33 7,341.05 57.50 11,386.45 39.4 4601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,400.00 .00 .00 .00 4,400.00 0.0 4601-4315 MEMBERSHIP 700.00 285.00 1,423.00 .00 723.00- 203.3 4601-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,870.00 18.02- 5,845.67 .00 24.33 99.6 4601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 7,286.00 609.00 7,286.00 .00 .00 100.0 4601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 21,309.00 1,773.00 21,309.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 87,750.00 9,882.22 72,402.63 6,104.37 9,243.00 89.5 4601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4601-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 7,508.00 4,592.56 7,692.36 1,450.96 1,635.32- 121.8 4601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,113.00 .00 3,338.00 983.45 208.45- 105.1 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 11,621.00 4,592.56 11,030.36 2,434.41 1,843.77- 115.9 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 560,995.00 48,910.37 494,893.43 8,538.78 57,562.79 89.7 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 12 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 59,664.00 .00 .00 59,664.00 .00 100.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8608 PUB WORKS YARD RELOCATION 8608-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8608-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,950.00 3,647.12 3,507.80 .00 2,442.20 59.0 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 279,163.00 .00 .00 .00 279,163.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 12,792,627.00 1,118,385.79 11,826,662.16 122,436.60 843,528.24 93.4 GENERAL FUND 12,792,627.00 1,118,385.79 11,826,662.16 122,436.60 843,528.24 93.4 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 13 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 43,993.00 3,666.12 43,993.00 .00 .00 100.0 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 2601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 189,933.00 15,217.79 184,680.71 .00 5,252.29 97.2 2601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,773.00 124.92 1,228.74 .00 544.26 69.3 2601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 12,026.00 .00 3,370.90 .00 8,655.10 28.0 2601-4180 RETIREMENT 25,282.00 1,957.28 23,733.07 .00 1,548.93 93.9 2601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 20,217.00 1,629.87 19,751.76 .00 465.24 97.7 2601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,023.00 160.47 1,972.13 .00 50.87 97.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 251,254.00 19,090.33 234,737.31 .00 16,516.69 93.4 2601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 149,816.00 18,411.00 101,978.66 8,725.00 39,112.34 73.9 2601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 19,340.00 1,569.92 10,809.17 .00 8,530.83 55.9 CONTRACT SERVICES 169,156.00 19,980.92 112,787.83 8,725.00 47,643.17 71.8 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4303 UTILITIES 160,060.00 10,836.49 119,615.79 .00 40,444.21 74.7 2601-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 .00 124.10 .00 125.90 49.6 2601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 25,180.00 4,652.90 30,239.12 832.65 5,891.77- 123.4 2601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 24,516.00 2,043.00 24,516.00 .00 .00 100.0 - 2601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 24,915.00 2,079.00 24,915.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 234,921.00 19,611.39 199,410.01 832.65 34,678.34 85.2 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 655,331.00 58,682.64 546,935.15 9,557.65 98,838.20 84.9 8100 STREET SAFETY 8146 MEDIAN UPGRADE 8146-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8146-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8153 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 14TH 8153-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8153-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 120,000.00 .00 .00 .00 120,000.00 0.0 8155 LIGHT/AVIATION/PROSPECT 8155-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8155-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 120,000.00 15,807.10 86,352.11 .00 33,647.89 72.0 8156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 13TH 8156-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 14 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8156-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 120,000.00 .00 .00 .00 120,000.00 0.0 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 173,728.00 124,127.19 124,1.27.19 173,728.00 124,127.19- 171.4 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 .00 2,187.50 12,062.50 5,750.00 71.3 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 .00 2,187.50 12,062.50 5,750.00 71.3 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 140,000.00 .00 .00 .00 140,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,413,052.00 202,283.05 805,782.45 207,410.65 399,858.90 71.7 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 1,413,052.00 202,283.05 805,782.45 207,410.65 399,858.90 71.7 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 15 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 5,707.00 162.95 5,707.00 .00 .00 100.0 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3301 DNTWN ENHANCEMENT COMM 3301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 19,546.00 1,301.82 16,970.64 .00 2,575.36 86.8 3301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,205.00 .00 .00 .00 1,205.00 0.0 3301-4180 RETIREMENT 2,586.00 197.26 2,485.47 .00 100.53 96.1 3301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,556.00 131.23 1,567.49 .00 11.49- 100.7 3301-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 286.00 22.60 284.30 .00 1.70 99.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 25,179.00 1,652.91 21,307.90 .00 3,871.10 84.6 3301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 70,425.00 8,973.77 64,812.75 .00 5,612.25 92.0 3301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3301-4302 ADVERTISING 13,600.00 232.00 1,077.00 .00 12,523.00 7.9 3301-4304 TELEPHONE 200.00 .00 83.25 .00 116.75 41.6 3301-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 700.00 .18 323.65 .00 376.35 46.2 3301-4331 DOWNTOWN BANNER PROGRAM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3301-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 785.00 70.00 785.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 15,285.00 302.18 2,268.90 .00 13,016.10 14.8 3301-4900 DEPRECIATION 3301-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 3301-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** DEPRECIATION 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 DNTWN ENHANCEMENT COMM 110,939.00 10,928.86 88,389.55 .00 22,549.45 79.7 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8160-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 .00 100.00 .00 100.00- *** 8160-4189 FICA .00 .00 .59 .00 .59- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 .00 100.59 .00 100.59- *** 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 832,539.00 244,962.06 728,720.92 99,278.59 4,539.49 99.5 8160-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8160-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .00 .00 718.94 .00 718.94- *** 8160-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 397.00 .00 396.67 .00 .33 99.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 397.00 .00 1,115.61 .00 718.61- 281.0 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 832,936.00 244,962.06 729,937.12 99,278.59 3,720.29 99.6 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 16 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 10,300.00 .00 10,300.00- *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 949,582.00 256,053.87 834,333.67 99,278.59 15,969.74 98.3 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 949,582.00 256,053.87 834,333.67 99,278.59 15,969.74 98.3 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 110 PARKING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 17 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1204 FINANCE CASHIER 1204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 165,307.00 10,136.72 132,300.58 .00 33,006.42 80.0 1204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,200.00 .00 7.66 .00 1,192.34 0.6 1204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 10,568.00 133.92 1,829.32 .00 8,738.68 17.3 1204-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 7,006.00 1,852.40 15,407.97 .00 8,401.97- 219.9 1204-4180 RETIREMENT 22,140.00 1,486.38 18,630.53 .00 3,509.47 84.1 1204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 19,016.00 1,170.51 16,925.23 .00 2,090.77 89.0 1204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 915.00 126.25 1,442.87 .00 527.87- 157.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 226,152.00 14,906.18 186,544.16 .00 39,607.84 82.5 1204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 17,206.00 4,651.60 30,158.93 .00 12,952.93- 175.3 1204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1204-4304 TELEPHONE 3,398.00 128.97 2,390.60 .00 1,007.40 70.4 1204-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 26,932.00 247.43 22,760.02 108.25 4,063.73 84.9 1204-4315 MEMBERSHIP 155.00 .00 75.00 .00 80.00 48.4 1204-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,056.00 24.50 1,428.03 .00 1,627.97 46.7 1204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,984.00 582.00 6,984.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 40,525.00 982.90 33,637.65 108.25 6,779.10 83.3 1204-4900 DEPRECIATION 1204-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 90.00 .00 .00 .00 90.00 0.0 1204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1204-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 660.00 132.49 489.72 .00 170.28 74.2 1204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 3,929.00 .00 .00 .00 3,929.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4,589.00 132.49 489.72 .00 4,099.28 10.7 FINANCE CASHIER 288,562.00 20,673.17 250,830.46 108.25 37,623.29 87.0 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 869,050.00 72,420.87 869,050.00 .00 .00 100.0 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 408,699.00 36,425.58 410,240.12 .00 1,541.12- 100.4 3302-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 8,000.00 .00 6,357.58 .00 1,642.42 79.5 3302-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 26,565.00 .00 17,718.29 .00 8,846.71 66.7 3302-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 64,000.00 3,820.00 47,724.41 .00 16,275.59 74.6 3302-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4,100.00 268.26 3,781.37 .00 318.63 92.2 3302-4180 RETIREMENT 64,275.00 5,780.71 65,086.84 .00 811.84- 101.3 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 110 PARKING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 18 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3302-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 3,380.00 230.52 2,908.59 .00 471.41 86.1 3302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 43,626.00 3,292.17 43,334.07 .00 291.93 99.3 3302-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 6,423.00 380.22 4,900.83 .00 1,522.17 76.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 629,068.00 50,197.46 602,052.10 .00 27,015.90 95.7 3302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 6,060.00 362.00 2,003.48 .00 4,056.52 33.1 3302-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3,500.00 .00 1,803.18 .00 1,696.82 51.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 9,560.00 362.00 3,806.66 .00 5,753.34 39.8 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4304 TELEPHONE 4,000.00 230.06 3,428.69 .00 571.31 85.7 3302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10,949.00 117.31 10,644.99 .00 304.01 97.2 3302-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,600.00 705.00 5,599.36 .00 1,999.36- 155.5 3302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,500.00 329.29 420.48 .00 2,079.52 16.8 3302-4315 MEMBERSHIP 175.00 .00 150.00 .00 25.00 85.7 3302-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 76,583.00 6,381.00 76,583.00 .00 .00 100.0 3302-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 54,861.00 4,569.00 54,861.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 152,668.00 12,331.66 151,687.52 .00 980.48 99.4 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 1,047.00 .00 .00 .00 1,047.00 0.0 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 11,000.00 .00 .00 .00 11,000.00 0.0 3302-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 560.00 .00 .00 .00 560.00 0.0 3302-4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** DEPRECIATION 12,607.00 .00 .00 .00 12,607.00 0.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES 803,903.00 62,891.12 757,546.28 .00 46,356.72 94.2 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,961,515.00 155,985.16 1,877,426.74 108.25 83,980.01 95.7 PARKING FUND 1,961,515.00 155,985.16 1,877,426.74 108.25 83,980.01 95.7 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 19 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 340,988.00 28,415.63 340,988.00 .00 .00 100.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8144 STRAND WALL 8144-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8144-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 56,715.00 .00 18,500.00 .00 38,215.00 32.6 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE 7,010.00 .00 .00 .00 7,010.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 404,713.00 28,415.63 359,488.00 .00 45,225.00 88.8 STATE GAS TAX FUND 404,713.00 28,415.63 359,488.00 .00 45,225.00 88.8 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 117 AB939 FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 20 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 5300 AB939 5301 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 5301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 5301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 13,429.00 1,189.76 14,094.16 .00 665.16- 105.0 5301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 428.06 .00 428.06- *** 5301-4180 RETIREMENT 1,799.00 147.37 1,745.66 .00 53.34 97.0 5301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 475.00 118.00 1,378.38 .00 903.38- 290.2 5301-4189 FICA 195.00 17.42 212.43 .00 17.43- 108.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 15,898.00 1,472.55 17,858.69 .00 1,960.69- 112.3 5301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 5301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 19,000.00 10,624.00 20,624.00 .00 1,624.00- 108.5 5301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5301-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 36,398.00 12,096.55 38,482.69 .00 2,084.69- 105.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 36,398.00 12,096.55 38,482.69 .00 2,084.69- 105.7 AB939 FUND 36,398.00 12,096.55 38,482.69 .00 2,084.69- 105.7 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 119 COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE -21 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** COMPENSATED ABSENCES FUND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 * * * EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 22 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 60,779.00 .00 .00 .00 60,779.00 0.0 8155 LIGHT/AVIATION/PROSPECT 8155-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8155-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 28,720.00 .00 .00 .00 28,720.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 89,499.00 .00 .00 .00 89,499.00 0.0 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 89,499.00 .00 .00 .00 89,499.00 0.0 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 23 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3,473,078.00 297.74 28,731.24 168,164.80 3,276,181.96 5.7 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 395,200.00 .00 .00 .00 395,200.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 3,868,278.00 297.74 28,731.24 168,164.80 3,671,381.96 5.1 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 3,868,278.00 297.74 28,731.24 168,164.80 3,671,381.96 5.1 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 24 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8500 PARKS 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 24,265.00 .00 .00 .00 24,265.00 0.0 8515-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8515-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .00 .00 486.58 .00 486.58- *** SO SCHOOL PARK 24,265.00 .00 486.58 .00 23,778.42 2.0 8523 NOBLE PARK 8523-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8523-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3,500.00 .00 .00 .00 3,500.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 27,765.00 .00 486.58 .00 27,278.42 1.8 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 27,765.00 .00 486.58 .00 27,278.42 1.8 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 25 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8500 PARKS 8506 VAR PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8506-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8506-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 870,202.00 36,072.00 97,558.46 18,371.00 754,272.54 13.3 8508 PARK IRRIGATION 8508-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8508-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 240.00 1,217.50 .00 1,217.50- *** 8508-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8508-4189 FICA .00 18.36 93.14 .00 93.14- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 258.36 1,310.64 .00 1,310.64- *** 8508-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8508-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 300,000.00 113.13 11,219.70 15,250.30 273,530.00 8.8 PARK IRRIGATION 300,000.00 371.49 12,530.34 15,250.30 272,219.36 9.3 8509 RESURFACE CLARK BASKETBALL CRT 8509-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8509-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 9,798.00 .00 .00 .00 9,798.00 0.0 8514 ATSF R -R -O -W PURCHASE 8514-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8514-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 342.54 .00 342.54- *** 8514-5500 LAND 8514-5501 LAND 1,501,600.00 .00 1,501,583.50 .00 16.50 100.0 8514-6700 INTEREST 8514-6700 INTEREST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** ATSF R -R -O -W PURCHASE 1,501,600.00 .00 1,501,926.04 .00 326.04- 100.0 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515:4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 .00 .00 .00 20,000.00 0.0 8525 SO. PARK ROLLER HOCKEY RINK 8525-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8525-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 10,780.00 .00 .00 9,800.00 980.00 90.9 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 200,000.00 .00 .00 .00 200,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,912,380.00 36,443.49 1,612,014.84 43,421.30 1,256,943.86 56.8 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 2,912,380.00 36,443.49 1,612,014.84 43,421.30 1,256,943.86 56.8 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 26 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 156,300.00 6,405.00 8,315.00 15,211.00 132,774.00 15.1 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 156,300.00 6,405.00 8,315.00 15,211.00 132,774.00 15.1 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 156,300.00 6,405.00 8,315.00 15,211.00 132,774.00 15.1 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 27 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8622-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 4,911.00 .00 1,765.51 .00 3,145.49 36.0 8622-4180 RETIREMENT 661.00 .00 285.62 .00 375.38 43.2 8622-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 178.17 .00 178.17- *** 8622-4189 FICA 28.00 .00 2.65 .00 25.35 9.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 5,600.00 .00 2,231.95 .00 3,368.05 39.9 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 122,280.00 8,235.09 11,535.09 1,721.55- 112,466.46 8.0 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 127,880.00 8,235.09 13,767.04 1,721.55- 115,834.51 9.4 8623 COMMUNITY CENTER REMODEL 8623-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8623-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 145,215.00 .00 .00 .00 145,215.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 273,095.00 8,235.09 13,767.04 1,721.55- 261,049.51 4.4 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 273,095.00 8,235.09 13,767.04 1,721.55- 261,049.51 4.4 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 28 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3400 PUBLIC TRANSIT 3401 DIAL A RIDE 3401-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 26,300.00 2,326.39 24,399.48 .00 1,900.52 92.8 3401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 175,400.00 .00 122,662.29 .00 52,737.71 69.9 3401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3401-4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 3401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 .00 28.20 .00 471.80 5.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 550.00 .00 28.20 .00 521.80 5.1 DIAL A RIDE 202,250.00 2,326.39 147,089.97 .00 55,160.03 72.7 3403 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 3403-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3403-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 900.00 .00 900.00 .00 .00 100.0 3403-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3403-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 6,000.00 312.00 3,816.00 .00 2,184.00 63.6 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 6,900.00 312.00 4,716.00 .00 2,184.00 68.3 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS 3408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,600.00 240.10 1,600.01 .00 .01- 100.0 3408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3408-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 10,600.00 .00 .00 .00 10,600.00 0.0 COMMUTER XPRESS 12,200.00 240.10 1,600.01 .00 10,599.99 13.1 3409 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 3409-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3409-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,865.00 179.46 2,000.55 .00 135.55- 107.3 3409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 15,675.00 642.33 9,542.68 .00 6,132.32 60.9 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 17,540.00 821.79 11,543.23 .00 5,996.77 65.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 238,890.00 3,700.28 164,949.21 .00 73,940.79 69.0 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 238,890.00 3,700.28 164,949.21 .00 73,940.79 69.0 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 29 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 150,000.00 .00 .00 .00 150,000.00 0.0 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 163,000.00 .00 .00 163,000.00 .00 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 313,000.00 .00 .00 163,000.00 150,000.00 52.1 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 313,000.00 .00 .00 163,000.00 150,000.00 52.1 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 30 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 25,811.00 .00 25,811.00 .00 .00 100.0 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 .CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 286,837.00 .00 286,837.00 .00 .00 100.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 290,000.00 .00 .00 .00 290,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 602,648.00 .00 312,648.00 .00 290,000.00 51.9 GRANTS FUND 602,648.00 .00 312,648.00 .00 290,000.00 51.9 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 31 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2104 SPEED ENFORCEMENT/EDUC PROGRAM 2104-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2104-4187 UNIFORMS 2,200.00 .00 1,934.62 .00 265.38 87.9 2104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2104-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 250.00 .00 249.63 .00 .37 99.9 2104-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 3,000.00 .00 1,110.92 .00 1,889.08 37.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,250.00 .00 1,360.55 .00 1,889.45 41.9 2104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2104-5402 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 22,750.00 .00 21,894.87 .00 855.13 96.2 2104-5403 VEHICLES 21,159.00 .00 20,619.32 .00 539.68 97.4 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 43,909.00 .00 42,514.19 . .00 1,394.81 96.8 SPEED ENFORCEMENT/EDUC PROGRAM 49,359.00 .00 45,809.36 .00 3,549.64 92.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 49,359.00 .00 45,809.36 .00 3,549.64 92.8 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND 49,359.00 .00 45,809.36 .00 3,549.64 92.8 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 32 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 38,000.00 3,166.63 38,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3701-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 202.00 .00 .00 .00 202.00 0.0 3701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3701-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 3701-4327 AQMD INCENTIVES 2,500.00 85.00 925.00 .00 1,575.00 37.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,000.00 85.00 925.00 .00 2,075.00 30.8 EMISSION CONTROL 3,202.00 85.00 925.00 .00 2,277.00 28.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 41,202.00 3,251.63 38,925.00 .00 2,277.00 94.5 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 41,202.00 3,251.63 38,925.00 .00 2,277.00 94.5 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 33 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2106 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 2106-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2106-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 6,000.00 .00 6,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 2106-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2106-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,000.00 198.50 2,539.32 387.00 2,073.68 58.5 2106-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 1,500.00 .00 649.00 .00 851.00 43.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,500.00 198.50 3,188.32 387.00 2,924.68 55.0 2106-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2106-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN 500 .00 768.56 768.56 .00 768.56- *** 2106-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 30,500.00 15,077.79 30,052.13 .00 447.87 98.5 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 30,500.00 15,846.35 30,820.69 .00 320.69- 101.1 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 43,000.00 16,044.85 40,009.01 387.00 2,603.99 93.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 43,000.00 16,044.85 40,009.01 387.00 2,603.99 93.9 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 43,000.00 16,044.85 40,009.01 387.00 2,603.99 93.9 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 160 SEWER FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 34 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 3102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 181,341.00 13,298.73 166,057.66 .00 15,283.34 91.6 3102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 5,993.00 589.53 3,532.22 .00 2,460.78 58.9 3102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 11,435.00 .00 1,584.41 .00 9,850.59 13.9 3102-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3102-4180 RETIREMENT 24,023.00 1,700.31 21,196.47 .00 2,826.53 88.2 3102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,411.00 1,693.54 19,574.17 .00 1,836.83 91.4 3102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,900.00 131.88 1,666.92 .00 233.08 87.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 246,103.00 17,413.99 213,611.85 .00 32,491.15 86.8 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 115,000.00 3,161.65 79,807.45 .00 35,192.55 69.4 3102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3,400.00 .00 .00 .00 3,400.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 118,400.00 3,161.65 79,807.45 .00 38,592.55 67.4 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4303 UTILITIES 1,035.00 93.86 1,050.84 .00 15.84- 101.5 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,000.00 1,251.40 11,676.00 .00 324.00 97.3 3102-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 19,345.00 1,613.00 19,345.00 .00 .00 100.0 3102-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 26,133.00 2,175.00 26,133.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 58,513.00 5,133.26 58,204.84 .00 308.16 99.5 3102-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE' 3102-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,400.00 .00 14.77 .00 1,385.23 1.1 3102-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 16,100.00 4,546.86 10,547.45 3,420.65 2,131.90 86.8 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 17,500.00 4,546.86 10,562.22 3,420.65 3,517.13 79.9 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 440,516.00 30,255.76 362,186.36 3,420.65 74,908.99 83.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8300 STORM DRAIN 8301 MISC STORM DRAINS 8301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8302 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 8302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8302-4180 RETIREMENT 8302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 304,050.00 280,409.94 280,409.94 304,050.00 280,409.94- 192.2 85,000.00 .00 4,865.70 .00 80,134.30 5.7 .00 487.50 6,722.61 .00 6,722.61- .00 62.99 907.42 .00 907.42- .00 27.37 337.40 .00 337.40- *** *** *** EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 160 SEWER FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 35 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8302-4189 FICA .00 7.79 111.44 .00 111.44- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 585.65 8,078.87 .00 8,078.87- *** 8302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 75,000.00 3,962.86 26,116.74 82.54 48,800.72 34.9 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 75,000.00 4,548.51 34,195.61 82.54 40,721.85 45.7 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8408 SANITARY SEWER 8408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 49,104.00 5,508.75 63,021.08 .00 13,917.08- 128.3 8408-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 240.00 1,217.50 .00 1,217.50- *** 8408-4180 RETIREMENT 6,565.00 711.80 8,212.85 .00 1,647.85- 125.1 8408-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,778.00 214.64 2,407.28 .00 629.28- 135.4 8408-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 712.00 100.03 1,031.23 .00 319.23- 144.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 58,159.00 6,775.22 75,889.94 .00 17,730.94- 130.5 8408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8408-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,194,402.00 282,104.04 502,505.97 162,324.60 529,571.43 55.7 8408-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8408-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .00 .00 55.09 .00 55.09- *** 8408-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,895.00 157.00 1,895.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,895.00 157.00 1,950.09 .00 55.09- 102.9 SANITARY SEWER 1,254,456.00 289,036.26 580,346.00 162,324.60 511,785.40 59.2 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,259,022.00 604,250.47 1,262,003.61 469,877.79 527,140.60 76.7 SEWER FUND 2,259,022.00 604,250.47 1,262,003.61 469,877.79 527,140.60 76.7 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 36 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2103 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 2103-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2103-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING .00 .00 208.00 .00 208.00- *** 2103-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2103-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1000 477.00 791.40 1,267.68 1,337.52 2,128.20- 546.2 2103-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 191,323.00 375.76 125,467.87 51,993.04 13,862.09 92.8 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 191,800.00 1,167.16 126,735.55 53,330.56 11,733.89 93.9 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 191,800.00 1,167.16 126,943.55 53,330.56 11,525.89 94.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8619 POL REMODEL III 8619-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 8619-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 740.00 .00 740.43 .00 .43- 100.1 8619-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 2,032.00 .00 2,031.99 .00 .01 100.0 POL REMODEL III 2,772.00 .00 2,772.42 .00 .42- 100.0 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 53,000.00 .00 .00 .00 53,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 247,572.00 1,167.16 129,715.97 53,330.56 64,525.47 73.9 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 247,572.00 1,167.16 129,715.97 53,330.56 64,525.47 73.9 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 37 07/16/97 12:11:08 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 51,230.00 4,269.13 51,230.00 .00 .00 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 51,230.00 4,269.13 51,230.00 .00 .00 100.0 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 51,230.00 4,269.13 51,230.00 .00 .00 100.0 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 705 INSURANCE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 38 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1209 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1209-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1209-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 30,119.00 850.84 27,992.87 .00 2,126.13 92.9 1209-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,846.00 .00 3,297.17 .00 1,451.17- 178.6 1209-4180 RETIREMENT 3,888.00 109.91 3,498.21 .00 389.79 90.0 1209-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,082.00 96.31 2,790.61 .00 291.39 90.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 38,935.00 1,057.06 37,578.86 .00 1,356.14 96.5 1209-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1209-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 113,400.00 .00 92,960.25 .00 20,439.75 82.0 1209-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1209-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 10.48 383.25 .00 116.75 76.7 1209-4315 MEMBERSHIP 325.00 .00 320.00 .00 5.00 98.5 1209-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,000.00 .00 35.00 .00 965.00 3.5 1209-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 275,000.00 11,881.47 282,236.54 .00 7,236.54- 102.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 276,825.00 11,891.95 282,974.79 .00 6,149.79- 102.2 LIABILITY INSURANCE 429,160.00 12,949.01 413,513.90 .00 15,646.10 96.4 1210 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 1210-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1210-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,950.00 .00 20,694.00 .00 256.00 98.8 1210-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1210-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 15,000.00 226.82 924.84- 1,529.37 14,395.47 4.0 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 35,950.00 226.82 19,769.16 1,529.37 14,651.47 59.2 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT 1215-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1215-4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 28,900.00 .00 24,576.73 .00 4,323.27 85.0 1217 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1217-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1217-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 30,119.00 850.85 27,993.47 .00 2,125.53 92.9 1217-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,846.00 .00 3,297.22 .00 1,451.22- 178.6 1217-4180 RETIREMENT 3,888.00 109.97 3,498.60 .00 389.40 90.0 1217-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,082.00 96.31 2,791.33 .00 290.67 90.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 38,935.00 1,057.13 37,580.62 .00 1,354.38 96.5 1217-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 49,480.00 .00 45,994.00 .00 3,486.00 93.0 1217-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,000.00 .00 4,505.40 .00 2,505.40- 225.3 CONTRACT SERVICES 51,480.00 .00 50,499.40 .00 980.60 98.1 1217-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 07/16/97. 12:11:08 705 INSURANCE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 39 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1217-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 800.00 26.88 594.93 135.31 69.76 91.3 1217-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 1,100.00 .00 162.70 .00 937.30 14.8 1217-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00 36,993.13 497,868.08 .00 147,868.08- 142.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 351,900.00 37,020.01 498,625.71 135.31 146,861.02- 141.7 1217-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1217-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 .00 .00 19.05 .00 19.05- *** WORKERS COMPENSATION 442,315.00 38,077.14 586,724.78 135.31 144,545.09- 132.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 936,325.00 51,252.97 1,044,584.57 1,664.68 109,924.25- 111.7 INSURANCE FUND 936,325.00 51,252.97 1,044,584.57 1,664.68 109,924.25- 111.7 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 40 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 65.00 .00 32.51 .00 32.49 50.0 1202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 65.00 .00 130.37 .00 65.37- 200.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 130.00 .00 162.88 .00 32.88- 125.3 1202-4900 DEPRECIATION 1202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 130.00 .00 162.88 .00 32.88- 125.3 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 25,100.00 1,795.14 26,423.15 .00 1,323.15- 105.3 2101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 30,552.00 2,825.21 26,000.74 703.63 3,847.63 87.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 55,652.00 4,620.35 52,423.89 703.63 2,524.48 95.5 2101-4900 DEPRECIATION 2101-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5403 VEHICLES 76,500.00 .00 4,357.09 .00 72,142.91 5.7 POLICE 132,152.00 4,620.35 56,780.98 703.63 74,667.39 43.5 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4,200.00 321.94 4,754.83 .00 554.83- 113.2 2201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 6,400.00 537.80 4,897.61 .00 1,502.39 76.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 10,600.00 859.74 9,652.44 .00 947.56 91.1 2201-4900 DEPRECIATION 2201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5403 VEHICLES 408,181.00 .00 176,151.93 208,612.70 23,416.37 94.3 FIRE 418,781.00 859.74 185,804.37 208,612.70 24,363.93 94.2 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,400.00 161.44 2,510.76 .00 110.76- 104.6 2601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 3,300.00 110.68 1,583.70 176.03 1,540.27 53.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5,700.00 272.12 4,094.46 176.03 1,429.51 74.9 2601-4900 DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 41 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5403 VEHICLES 27,052.00 .00 26,511.51 .00 540.49 98.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 32,752.00 272.12 30,605.97 176.03 1,970.00 94.0 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 734.00 .00 981.55 .00 247.55- 133.7 3102-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,800.00 402.29 1,810.39 .00 10.39- 100.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,534.00 402.29 2,791.94 .00 257.94- 110.2 3102-4900 DEPRECIATION 3102-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3102-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3102-5403 VEHICLES 26,000.00 .00 .00 .00 26,000.00 0.0 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 28,534.00 402.29 2,791.94 .00 25,742.06 9.8 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,720.00 426.47 3,022.95 .00 302.95- 111.1 3104-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 6,211.00 216.87 2,861.56 .00 3,349.44 46.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8,931.00 643.34 5,884.51 .00 3,046.49 65.9 3104-4900 DEPRECIATION 3104-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 8,931.00 643.34 5,884.51 .00 3,046.49 65.9 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 8,030.00 863.27 7,513.27 .00 516.73 93.6 3302-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 8,500.00 1,788.09 10,237.95 378.88 2,116.83- 124.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,530.00 2,651.36 17,751.22 378.88 1,600.10- 109.7 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5403 VEHICLES 39,000.00 .00 7,834.42 .00 31,165.58 20.1 COMMUNITY SERVICES 55,530.00 2,651.36 25,585.64 378.88 29,565.48 46.8 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4900 DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 42 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3701-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3701-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3701-5403 VEHICLES 38,000.00 .00 .00 21,999.65 16,000.35 57.9 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,215.00 45.84 569.66 .00 645.34 46.9 4201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,150.00 12.30 613.51 .00 536.49 53.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,365.00 58.14 1,183.17 .00 1,181.83 50.0 4201-4900 DEPRECIATION 4201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 2,365.00 58.14 1,183.17 .00 1,181.83 50.0 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3,863.00 126.11 1,106.21 .00 2,756.79 28.6 4202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 303.29 2,843.26 .00 1,843.26- 284.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,863.00 429.40 3,949.47 .00 913.53 81.2 4202-4900 DEPRECIATION 4202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5403 VEHICLES 18,000.00 .00 17,542.99 .00 457.01 97.5 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 22,863.00 429.40 21,492.46 .00 1,370.54 94.0 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3,550.00 43.68 773.25 .00 2,776.75 21.8 4204-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,700.00 .00 8.20 .00 2,691.80 0.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,250.00 43.68 781.45 .00 5,468.55 12.5 4204-4900 DEPRECIATION 4204-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6,250.00 43.68 781.45 .00 5,468.55 12.5 4206 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 4206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 75,541.00 3,684.56 70,050.33 .00 5,490.67 92.7 4206-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,910.00 .00 1,152.54 .00 3,757.46 23.5 4206-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 2,080.00 7,020.00 .00 7,020.00- *** 4206-4180 RETIREMENT 10,099.00 476.10 9,051.43 .00 1,047.57 89.6 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 43 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,291.00 348.59 8,606.62 .00 315.62- 103.8 4206-4189 FICA 485.00 159.12 915.46 .00 430.46- 188.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 99,326.00 6,748.37 96,796.38 .00 2,529.62 97.5 4206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 7,540.00 .00 550.00 .00 6,990.00 7.3 4206-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3,600.00 .00 289.66 .00 3,310.34 8.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 11,140.00 .00 839.66 .00 10,300.34 7.5 4206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 6,500.00 245.46 3,261.35 .00 3,238.65 50.2 4206-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,225.00 49.38 1,955.59 .00 269.41 87.9 4206-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,100.00 86.71 1,282.90 .00 817.10 61.1 4206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,188.00 936.00 11,188.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 22,013.00 1,317.55 17,687.84 .00 4,325.16 80.4 4206-4900 DEPRECIATION 4206-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EQUIPMENT SERVICE 132,479.00 8,065.92 115,323.88 .00 17,155.12 87.1 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 825.00 36.85 934.06 .00 109.06- 113.2 4601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 622.44 2,366.12 .00 1,366.12- 236.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,825.00 659.29 3,300.18 .00 1,475.18- 180.8 4601-4900 DEPRECIATION 4601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** COMMUNITY RESOURCES 1,825.00 659.29 3,300.18 .00 1,475.18- 180.8 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 83,000.00 .00 .00 .00 83,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 963,592.00 18,705.63 449,697.43 231,870.89 282,023.68 70.7 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 963,592.00 18,705.63 449,697.43 231,870.89 282,023.68 70.7 EXPPRIN2 07/16/97 12:11:08 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 44 ADJUSTED JUNE 1996-97 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND EXPENDITURE CONTROL 30,631,044.00 2,527,243.49 20,945,062.57 1,574,440.56 8,111,540.87 73.5 GRAND TOTALS 30,631,044.00 2,527,243.49 20,945,062.57 1,574,440.56 8,111,540.87 73.5 R-eze1,0-e., EA ,Ler2. TREASURER'S REPORT - JUN'97 FUND GENERAL NUMBER ACCOUNT 6/1/97 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENT 6/30/97 CHECKS ADJUSTMENT BALANCE 001 105 109 110 115 117 119 120 121 125 126 127 140 145 146 150 152 153 155 160 170 180 705 715 GENERAL LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT PARKING STATE GAS TAX AB939 COMP ABSENCES COUNTY GAS TAX PROP A OPEN SPACE PARK REC FAG TAX RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY BUILDING IMPROVMENT FUND COMM DEVELOP. BLOCK GRANT PROPOSITION A FUND PROPOSITION C FUND GRANT FUND TRAFF!C SAFETY GRANT FUND AIR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFOR SVC CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT SEWER MAINTENANCE ASSET SEIZURE FUND FIRE PROTECTION FUND INSURANCE FUND EQUIP.REPLACEMENT FUND TRUST ACCOUNTS $3,452,681.37 $836,952.51 $439,220.57 $228,412.76 $55,116.25 $134,655.20 $308,787.19 $74,121.95 $430,126.31 $130,483.00 $1,531,691.27 $153,566.90 ($2,187.63) $103,438.07 $387,229.20 ($130,327.03) ($5,355.48) $13,669.36 $20,931.38 ($53.51) $2,398,805.28 $199,154.33 $157,278.57 $1,071,122.44 $1,074,608.49 $860,898.72 $33,324.60 $196,462.74 $29,987.61 $145,679.51 ($731,087.91) ($348,526.91) $3,379,644.78 $3,783.29 ($54,959.68) ($10,438.53) $775,337.59 $2,029.29 ($225,605.71) ($599.92) $248,368.83 $1,349.69 ($87,222.60) ($92,093.66) $246,908.93 $238.70 ($28,417.41) $56,925.15 $578.82 ($11,264.64) ($207.88) $123,761.50 $24,292.44 $333,079.63 $318.62 $74,440.57 ($191.91) $429,934.40 $3,500.00 $560.89 $134,543.89 $6,584.07 ($36,288.82) ($38.85) $1,501,947.67 $660.12 ($4,675.00) $149,552.02 ($2,825.00) ($5,012.63) $149.60 $475.91 ($1,031.50) ($49.15) $102,982.93 $10,733.00 $1,869.64 ($205.11) $399,626.73 ($130,327.03) ($5,355.48) $4,712.23 $65.26 ($72.28) ($3,184.65) $15,189.92 $89.97 ($15,546.92) $5,474.43 $73.40 ($73.40) ($53.51) $2,602.68 $78,046.83 ($584,692.49) ($8,232.21) $1,886,530.09 $13,085.30 ($375.76) ($12,229.22) $199,634.65 $3,023.00 $676.07 ($4,269.13) $156,708.51 $7,534.07 $102,515.89 ($69,580.10) ($479.06) $1,111,113.24 $44,550.63 ($10,982.91) ($5,648.79) $1,102,527.42 $13,064,128.75 $1,152,928.25 $427,524.34 ($1,836,403.23) ($514,693.88) $12,293,484.23 BALANCE 611/97 BALANCE DEPOSITS CHARGES 6/30/97 PAYROLL CABLE TV DEPOSIT $11,951,538.76 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $490,823.40 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $3,000.00 $553,077.77 $553,077.77 $3,000.00 BANK BALANCE $10,000.00 $10,000.00 GENERAL $475,138.45 TRUST ACCTS $21,744.40 OUTSTANDING CHECKS $496,882.85 ($141,937.38) $354,945.47 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $11,951,538.76 BALANCE H ' M. WORKMAN, CITY TREASURER JULY 15, 1997 $12,306,484.23 ld(z) JULY 16; 1997 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the City Council of JULY 22, 1997 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of June 1997. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, . Workman reasurer NOTED: Stephen Rurrell City Manager NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Director 1d �3� INSTITUTION LAIF BALANCE 6/1/97 BALANCE 6/30/97 INVESTMENT REPORT - JUN'97 DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET TOTAL INVESTMENTS MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST $6,844,191.72 ($200,000.00) ($700,000.00) $5,944,191.72 5.560% CORPORATE NOTES: U.S.GOVERNMENT BONDS/NOTES: Investment $989,687.50 12/3/92 11/30/97 $1,000,000.00 $1,001,720.00 5.990% Investment $1,008,437.50 2/18/93 1/31/98 $1,000,000.00 $999,840.00 5.630% Investment $500,705.00 2/29/96 2/28/98 $500,705.00 $498,125.00 5.140% Investment $504,700.80 5/6/96 8/15/98 $498,164.06 $497,030.00 5.880% Investment $500,998.64 9/12/96 11/15/98 $492,031.25 $499,845.00 5.530% Federal Home Loan Bank $500,000.00 10/17/96 2/22/99 $500,000.00 $495,705.00 5.620% Federal National Mtg $500,000.00 6/3/97 6/3/99 $500,000.00 $501,350.00 6.290% SALLIEMAE $500,000.00 12/30/96 12/30/98 $500,000.00 $497,810.00 5.770% Investment $500,000.00 1/16/97 1/28/99 $500,000.00 $499,685.00 6.250% Investment $502,817.60 3/19/97 2/12/99. $499,687.50. $499,685.00 6.090% $5,990,587.81 $5,990,795.00 INVESTMENT TOTAL $11,951,538.76 In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, J' N ORKMAN EASURER 4doo1 %s04- 97- 61,76— July 87S July 7, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 ADOPTION OF THE 1997-98 APPROPRIATION LIMIT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 97- setting the 1997-98 appropriations limit. Background: In November of 1979, Article XIII B of the California State Constitution was added by the voters through Proposition 4. This Article established limits, using a formula, on state and local governments for appropriation of revenue from tax proceeds. On June 5, 1990, Proposition 111, modified the method of calculating the limit, beginning with fiscal year 1990-91, to allow the City to choose the most beneficial of two adjustment factors for inflation and population as follows: Inflation California Per Capita Personal Income or increase in non- residential assessed valuation due to new construction. Population City population growth or County population growth. Proposition 111 also implemented a requirement that our Appropriation Limit be reviewed annually by our independent auditor. Analysis: The 1997-98 limit was calculated, per the League of California Cities Uniform Guidelines, by applying the population and inflation factors to the prior year limit. The County population change of 1.24% was used as the population growth factor since it is greater than the population increase of 1.22% for Hermosa Beach. The California Per Capita Personal Income change of 4.67% was used as the inflation factor since the other growth factor for inflation, the increase in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction, is unavailable. The factor with the largest change is always chosen to give the City maximum discretion with regard to appropriations. The law requires adoption of the 1997-98 limit by resolution and a recorded vote of the Council to select annual adjustment factors. The choice is set forth in the attached resolution. The limit calculation will be reviewed by our auditors during the annual financial audit. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland, Finance Director Concur: Steph City anager F:/b95/audit/aprolimt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 WHEREAS, the voters of California, on November 6, 1979, added Article XIII B to the State Constitution, placing various limitations on appropriations of state and local governments; and WHEREAS, Article XIII B provides that the appropriations limit for the fiscal year 1997-98 is calculated by adjusting the base year appropriations of fiscal year 1978-79 and subsequent years for changes in the cost of living and population; and WHEREAS, Proposition 111 (Section 1.5 of Article XIII B ), enacted by the voters on June 5, 1990, modified the method of calculating the limit, beginning with fiscal year 1990-91; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has complied with all of the provisions of Article XIII B in determining the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1997-98; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1. That the City of Hermosa Beach chooses to use the growth in the California Per Capita Personal Income as the inflation adjustment factor for fiscal year 1997-98. SECTION 2. The City of Hermosa Beach chooses to use the change in population for the County of Los Angeles as the growth adjustment factor for fiscal year 1997-98. SECTION 3. The City of Hermosa Beach uses the Uniform Guidelines published by the League of California Cities in March 1991 to determine the limit and appropriations subject to the limit. 7, SECTION 4. Documentation for calculation of the limit is on file in the Finance Department and will be reviewed by the City's auditors during the annual financial audit, as required by Proposition 111. SECTION 5. The appropriations limit for the City of Hermosa Beach for fiscal yea 1997-98 is $14,306,861. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of July, 1997. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: 2 F:/B95/AUDIT/APRORES Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 Santa Monica Bay Competitive Grant Program - Approval of Application Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 6.700E -r-- Resc) �7 X58' rl July 16, 1997 Regular meeting of 1. Adopt Resolution 97- approving the application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Santa Monica Bay Competitive Grant Program for the Valley Park Detention Basin and Eco -System Project. Background: Los Angeles County Proposition A, which voters approved on November 3, 1992, allocated grant funds for the purpose of improving the safety of recreation areas, preventing gangs, planting trees, and acquiring, restoring and preserving beach, park, wildlife, and open space resources. $4 million of these grant funds are to be awarded for the purpose of restoring and improving the Santa Monica Bay by measurably reducing the toxicity and/or pollutant load in the urban runoff to the Bay. These grants, collectively are known as the Santa Monica Bay Competitive Grant Program. Over the past few months the Public Works Department has been working with the Environmental Programs Division of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to _develop a pilot project that could both decrease storm drain deficiencies and urban runoff pollutant levels within. the City of Hermosa Beach. The City's recently completed Master Plan of Drainage describes the City's requirements with regards to flood control and prioritizes it's needs for storm drain improvements. This plan determined that the Sixteenth Street Storm Drain is deficient to provide adequate protection during.a major storm event and is the City's number one priority for storm drainage improvement. The preferred alternative for mitigating this deficiency, the proposed construction of detention basins, one in Valley Park and one in the Hermosa Valley School playfield, could be designed to fulfill this duel role of flood control and non point source pollution control. 1f In August 1996 City Council passed Resolution No. 96-5821 approving application for this grant funding. Unfortunately the 16th Street Strom Drain Project was not approved for funding by the review committee in 1996. The reapplication for grant funds requires that a new resolution be passed. Analysis: The project proposed under this grant application would develop the Valley Park detention basin as called for in the approved Master Plan of Drainage. This would help relieve flooding which occurs in the Hermosa Valley area as well as provide additional capacity at the Sixteenth Street Drain for flows from Upper Pier Avenue and northeast portions of the city. These improvements would represent the first important step towards the "flood -proofing" of Hermosa Beach. Because this basin would indeed detain upstream flow in the park thereby delaying concentration at the Sixteenth Street Drain the park itself would occasionally flood for limited periods during large storms. As the downstream drain becomes able to accommodate flow the park/basin would slowly drain. Chronic drippings from automobiles, trucks and other equipment accumulate on paved surfaces and become incorporated into the stormwater runoff. Residues from pet droppings, pesticides and fertilizers also find their way into the storm drain system. Sewer system blockages and failures can put untreated human waste into the street and then into the storm drain. Accidental spills of chemicals can also occur. These waste streams must be stopped and treated before they are allowed to discharge. As a beach city Hermosa has the most to gain from the control of urban runoff pollution because it is our beaches that end up being the dumping ground for these pollutants from cities far upstream. It is our children that end up playing in the polluted hollows left in the sand after a storm. It is to our advantage therefor to lead the way in development of a pilot project that shows that flood control and environmental protection can go hand in hand. The sandy nature of Hermosa Beach's soil lends itself for use as a natural filtration system. Some of the water that would collect in the park would infiltrate using a leaching system into the well draining soil, providing an environmental as well as flood control benefit. There may be some other side benefits as well. Park irrigation could be reduced during the winter months and infiltrated storm water would help to recharge the ground water aquifer. But the primary benefit is that heavy metals, oils, grease, detergents and bacteria would be filtered into the soil rather than being deposited into the ocean. In order to keep concentrations of these types of pollution to a minimum a series of prefilters would be constructed which would treat low -flow street runoff. These Stormtreat systems are 9.5 foot diameter tanks which will be installed below grade. The center part of the tank is an enclosed chamber in which sedimentation and filtration of flows from the storm drain occur. The outer portion of the tank is an artificial wetland area, or open area of gravel and sand with vegetation growing in it which naturally absorbs pollutants from the drainwater. After passing though the Stormtreat flows are returned to the storm drain. During heavy storms flows would be bypassed to the detention basin. A preliminary plan of the proposed Valley Park Detention Basin and Eco -system Project is attached for City Council's information. This project is innovative because it shows that with careful planning a storm drain facility can be made enviromentally friendly. It can serve as an example to other municipalities, industries and agencies that the technology is available and that it can be implemented for a reasonable cost. Fiscal Impact: The cost to construct the Valley Park Detention Basin and Eco -system Project is estimated to be $680,000. If this project is selected for grant award the City will be asked to participate 20% or $136,000. Maintenance and cleaning of the eco -systems are estimated to cost the City $2,000 per year. Respectfully submitted, Joseph C. Mankawich Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance jcm/c/lacognt.doc Concur: OiVYI.IA.A411/4.- Amy Alm ani Director of Public Works Ahk Step 'CI 1 : n ell City Man, ger SCALE' I'•I50' 4YE,T-1E-L1:: • / -.„------ „..,,,,,,- ---- ...- -,----_.-- / ------- -- __,----,;6. .------ --- • --- :---`-- ...--"-- 7 --- / ,--- ,..---- 7 AT\ ,-"___,- „, .„ / / ....„, __________ ,..„ r-- / „z----- //7- LEGEND _--- / / / / 24 i / / ..... LSTtNalr0 MA DRAIN /.....___ / --, PROPFtAOSED STORM D ----.-------------- KM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1111111•11111MIUM -111.1411PROMOIIMIPPOIMINIIIII MASTER PLAN OF DRANAGE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VALLEY PARK DETENTION BASIN MATC. IQG nontrn.r tIn. 141 -QA -C V. RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SANTA MONICA BAY COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE VALLEY PARK DETENTION BASIN ECO -SYSTEM PROJECT. WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 1992, enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree -Planting, Senior and Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection (the Proposition), which, among other uses, provide funds to public agencies in the County for the restoration and improvement of the Santa Monica Bay by measurably reducing the toxicity of and/or pollutant load in the urban runoff to the Bay: and, WHEREAS, the Proposition has authorized the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (the Department) to administer said funds; and, WHEREAS, the Department has set forth the necessary procedures governing applications for grant funds under the Proposition; and, WHEREAS, Section 8.a.6 and 14 of the Proposition have allocated funds for capital outlay projects for the purpose of restoring and improving the Santa Monica Bay; and, WHEREAS, said Project does not include mitigation activities required under Federal or State laws; and, WHEREAS, said Project is not exclusively for the purpose of flood control; and, WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has entered into an agreement with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to perform the above Project; and, WHEREAS, the Department's procedures require the City of Hermosa Beach to certify, by resolution, the approval of the application before submission of said applicant to the Department; and, WHEREAS, any applicant selected for a grant award will be required to enter into an agreement with the Department for the performance of the project as described in the application; and, WHEREAS, said agreement will contain assurances that the City of Hermosa Beach must comply with, including an assurance to provide any additional funds that may be required to complete the project if the grant funds required are insufficient and an assurance to maintain the property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Does hereby approve the filing of an application with the Department for funds allocated under Section 8.a.6 of the Proposition for the above named project; and, SECTION 2. Certifies that the City of Hermosa Beach understands that it will be required to provide additional funding for the above named Project if the requested grant funds are insufficient to complete said project; and, SECTION 3. Certifies that the City of Hermosa Beach has, or will have, sufficient funds to operate and maintain the property; and, SECTION 4. Appoints the Director of Public Works as the agent of the City of Hermosa Beach to conduct all negotiations, and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, pay requests, and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned Project; and, SECTION 5. Certifies that the City of Hermosa Beach and the Department agree to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the other party against any and all liabilities, expenses, and claims arising from or connected with the work, authority, or justification of the respective party. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 1997. Ayes: Noes: Absent: Al PEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY srl.f.b95.reso.basinres Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 14, 1997 Regular meeting of July 22, 1997 REPORT OF CHANGE TO AN EXISTING CONTRACT FOR THE CLARK BUILDING SEISMIC RETROFIT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize additional expenditure from Park Improvement Fund CIP 97-506 for Clark Building Seismic Retrofit Project in an amount of $3,175. BACKGROUND: On March 11, 1997 the City Council awarded a construction contract to D & M Construction Inc. in the amount of $86,555 with contingencies of ($13,000) for minor changes as necessary. ANALYSIS: Four change orders for the total amount of $16,175 have been issued. These change orders are attached for your information. During the demolition portion of the contract presence of asbestos was noticed. The building materials were tested and found that asbestos existed only in the heater duct wrap. It is mandatory that asbestos found during construction be removed. Other items of work were added to the original contract to complete the job, such as removal of the old heaters, installation of new heaters, and insulation of the ceiling for more energy efficiency. CHANGE ORDERS AMOUNT No. 1 $ 5,600.00 No. 2 $ 2,000.00 No. 3 $ 7,180.00 No. 4 $ 1,395.00 Contingency ($13,000.00) Over Budget by $ 3,175.00 FISCAL IMPACT The available $880,000 FY 1997-98 Park Improvement Fund will be reduced by $3,175. Respectfully submitted: Concur: HomayZfun Behboodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance srl.a.ccitems.clark Amy Amirani Director of Public Woks Stephen R. City Manager CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO 1 CLARK BUILDING SIESMIC RETROFIT CIP 96-506 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Gentlemen: You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications of this contract. All new work herein described shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of the plans and specifications, except as specifically modified by this contract change order. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by Owner, or until an authorized Field Order is executed. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Remove old heaters, install (2) 125M BTU (5 -Ton A.C. Ready Each Unit). New duct work and Plenums, Registers, and Thermostats (by Honeywell with fan only switches and lock boxes). 20 year factory warranty on heater exchanger 5 year factory warranty on all parts 2 year warranty on labor REASON FOR CHANGE Existing Heaters Are Broken COST OF CHANGE CONTRACT TIME ADJUSTMENT RECOMMENDED BY: DATE H C.I.P. gineer $5,600.00 0 S/g/ 9 7 ACCEPTED BY: DATE Director df Public Works PW/bc/chngord.doc CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO 2 CLARK BUILDING SIESMIC RETROFIT CIP 96-506 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Gentlemen: You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications of this contract. All new work herein described shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of the plans and specifications, except as specifically modified by this contract change order. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by Owner, or until an authorized Field Order is executed. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Remove approximately 200 liner feet of insulated heater ducting from attic. Transport and disposal of the asbestos waste at an approved landfill. All operations and procedures shall be performed as required by law, but not limited to the following: Air monitoring during and after asbestos abatement operations; Utilization of negative pressure differential systems during as abatement operations; Set up of decontamination chamber for entry and exit to work area; Clearance air monitoring analysis shall be performed by an independent laboratory. The sub contractor (SCT Environmental Inc.) shall submit a copy of state contracting license and a copy of liability insurance prior to commencing this work. REASON FOR CHANGE The insulated ducts shall be removed prior to replacement of the old heaters. COST OF CHANGE $2,000.00 CONTRACT TIME ADJUSTMENT RECOMMENDED BY: '74"' C.I.P. ngmeer 1 DATE 5-8- 97 ACCEPTED BY: or DATE 57;V1 Director of Public Works PW/bc/chngord.doc CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO CLARK BUILDING SEISMIC RETROFIT CIP 96-506 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Gentlemen: You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications of this contract. All new work herein described shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of the plans and specifications, except as specifically modified by this contract change order. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by Owner, or until an authorized Field Order is executed. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 1. Install additional 9 parapet braces in back wall according to detail in the approved structural plans $1200 2. Remove damaged concrete, clean rebars, apply concrete glue over surface and apply hot shrink cement to rebuild parapet $ 980 3. Install approximately 900 s.£ of 3/4 c.d. x ply and fasten plywood to roof framing $2200 4. Install R30 fiber glass insulation over the entire ceiling $2400 5. Enlarge roof drain opening, install new metal rood scaple and lower drain opening to roof level $ 400 . All the above work includes, labor, material cleanup over head and all incidental cost associated with this change order REASON FOR CHANGE The above work is missing from the original plan. All of the above work must be completed for the scheduled improvements. COST OF CHANGE CONTRACT TIME ADJUSTMENT RECOMMENDED BY: DATE H ae445/21/ 97 C.I.P. srl.chngord.clark2 $7,180.00 0 ACCEPTED BY: DATE Director o¢public Works CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO 4 CLARK BUILDING SEISMIC RETROFIT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Gentlemen: You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications of this contract. All new work herein described shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of the plans and specifications, except as specifically modified by this contract change order. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by Owner, or until an authorized Field Order is executed. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 1. Remove and install 4 trash holders using 100% silicon caulking. 2. Repair of crack in URM brick chimney, open crack to 1 1/2 deep apply epoxy injection into cracks. 3. relocate HVAC and extend the gas line. REASON FOR CHANGE $400.00 $595.00 $400.00 The above work is missing from the original plan. all above work must be completed for the scheduled improvements. COST OF CHANGE CONTRACT TIME ADJUSTMENT $1,395.00 1 Day RECOMMENDED BY: DATE N ` 8e64 G/ii/`�7 C.I.P. glneer Director of Public Works srl.a.chanaeorder.chngord.doc ACCEPTED BY: DATE /4� Date ACTION SHEET AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS July 15, 1997 7:00 P.M. Peter Tucker Chairperson Rod Merl Vice Chairperson Sam Perrotti Ron Pizer Carol Schwartz The Public Comment Is Limited to Three Minutes Per Speaker 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call COMMISSIONERS. MERL & SCHWARTZ ABSENT Section I Consent Calendar Any Planning Commissioner or public wishing to pull an item from below may request to do so at this time. 3. Approval of June 17, 1997 minutes ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). 4. Resolution(s) for adoption a) Resolution P.C. 97-40 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #24791 for a two -unit condominium at 905 15th Street. b) Resolution P.C. 97-41 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #20760 for a two -unit condominium at 925 17th Street. c) Resolution P.C. 97-42 recommending amending the Zoning Ordinance to change the penalty for zoning violations from misdemeanors to infractions except for illegal dwelling units which will remain misdemeanors, and for specific types of illegal parking on private property which will be made 'administrative citations. d) Resolution P.C. 97-43 approving Conditional Use Permit amendment to allow live entertainment and on -sale general alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant at 73 Pier Avenue. lh 1 e) Resolution P.C. 97-44 approving a Variances from the front yard, open space, lot coverage requirements and to allow three stories, and to deny a Variance request for the rear yard at 1635 Palm Drive. (This item will be pulled by the stafj) f) Resolution P.C. 97-45 approving a Variances from the south side yard requirement to allow a 2.2' side yard to remain for a greater than 100 percent expansion to an existing single family dwelling, and to deny a request to maintain no side yard on the north side at 2429 Myrtle Avenue. (This item will be pulled by the staff) g) Resolution P.C. 97-46 to recommend amending the commercial permitted use list to add "Massage Therapy Business" as a conditionally permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 zones. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). 5. Item(s) for consideration NONE Section II Oral / Written Communications 6. Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. NONE Section III Public Hearing(s) 7. CUP 97-4 -- Amortized Conditional Use Permit for an existing miscellaneous repair shop, and auto storage at 322 Ardmore Avenue. (Continued from 5-20 and 6-17-97 meetings.) Staff Recommended Action: To continue to October 21, 1997 meeting to permit time to complete required zoning ordinance changes relative to project. ACTION: CONTINUED TO 10/21/97 MEETING (3-0) 8. CON 97-11 / PDP 97-10 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #24787 for a two -unit condominium at 1509 Manhattan Avenue. StaffRecommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). 9. CON 97-12 / PDP 97-11 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #24838 for a four -unit condominium at 937 First Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). 10. CON 97-13 / PDP 97-12 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #24824 for a two -unit condominium at 240 Monterey Boulevard. Staff Recommended Action: To continue to next scheduled meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO 9/16/97 MEETING (3-0) 11. VAR 97-4 -- Variance from parking and rear yard requirements to allow the expansion and remodel of a single-family dwelling to connect to an existing one -car detached garage, and to allow open parking in the front yard at 439 8th Street. 2 Staff Recommended Action: To approve requested Variance from parking and rear yard requirements and deny a Variance for open parking in the front yard. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). 12. VAR 97-5 -- Variance to allow lot coverage to exceed 65% for the expansion of an existing bathroom at 314 - 316 33rd Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: CONTINUED TO 9/16/97 MEETING DUE TO LACK OF A QUORUM (CHMN. TUCKER HAD TO ABSTAIN FOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST). Section IV Hearing(s) 13. P-24 -- Front yard interpretation at 2515 Hermosa Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff by minute order as deemed appropriate relative to interpretation of fence height in the front yard of a through lot. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). 14. Building height grade determination at 2055 Circle Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff by minute order as deemed appropriate relative to establishing the base elevation for height measurement. ACTION: EXAMINE ONE ADDITIONAL POTENTIAL OF ESTABLISHING BASE ELEVATION, AND IF NECESSARY PURSUE VARIANCE (3-0). Section V 15. Staff Items a. Resolution of Approval for a Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan minor amendment to eliminate a condition requiring leased parking for a restaurant at 1320 Hermosa Avenue (Tucci's). ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED (3-0). b. Memorandum regarding minor amendment to condominium to allow relocation of front door at 533 Monterey Boulevard. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). c. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED (3-0). d. City Council Minutes of June 3, 10 & 24, 1997. ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED (3-0). 16. Adjournment 3 _s- C. suss P C. oaemates Pat t , t� 199 644n5n.� i Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPELLANTS: APPLICANT: REQUEST: July 24, 1997 APPEALS --VARIANCE 97-3 & BUILDING HEIGHT DETERMINATION 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE VALENZUELA, DUNBABIN, WEBBER MYRTLE AVENUE JIM BERRY 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA TO APPEAL THE FOLLOWING PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS: 1. TO GRANT A VARIANCE TO ALLOW EXISTING NONCONFORMING SOUTH SIDE YARD OF 2.2' TO BE MAINTAINED FOR A GREATER THAN 100% REMODEL AND EXPANSION 2. TO USE THE NEAREST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AS THE BASE ELEVATION FOR BUILDING HEIGHT. (MEASURED FROM THE FLOW LINE OF THE STREET) Recommendations 1. To sustain the Planning Commission decision to grant the south side yard Variance by adopting the attached resolution. 2. To sustain the Planning Commission decision to use the nearest public improvement as the basis for measuring building height by minute order. Background At their meeting of June 17, 1997, the Planning Commission considered the requested Variances to maintain nonconforming side yards for an expansion and remodel that exceeded 100% increase in valuation. The Planning Commission granted the Variance for the south side yard (2.2 feet rather than the required 3 feet), and denied the request relative to the north side yard (0' rather than 3 feet). The Commission also addressed the issue of the building height measurement pursuant to their authority under Section 17.04.040 to resolve disputes regarding the base elevation, and supported staffs recommendation to use the nearest public improvement (determined to be the flow line of Myrtle Avenue). t44440 -e Proiect Information ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: LOT SIZE: EXISTING USE: EXISTING FLOOR AREA: PROPOSED FLOOR AREA: PERCENT INCREASE IN VALUATION: R-1 Low Density Residential 2,993 square feet Single-family dwelling 1,478 square feet 3,396 Square Feet 135% The subject lot is located on the west side of Myrtle Avenue with access from the west on Ozone Court. The lot slopes fairly steeply to towards the ocean from Myrtle Avenue to Ozone Court, with an elevation change of about 15 feet, with most of this change on an abrupt slope just west of Myrtle Avenue. The lot is currently developed with a one-story (two levels) single-family dwelling located on the low, westerly portion of the lot. The existing dwelling was constructed in 1922 and is currently nonconforming to side yard requirements on both sides of the lot. The applicant is proposing a substantial remodel and expansion project, involving the removal of the rear walls and rear (easterly) portions of the existing house and the construction of three new levels east of the existing dwelling. The project incorporates a new entry and orientation on Myrtle Avenue, and maximizes height up the slope to take advantage of ocean views. Analysis VARIANCES Existing side yards are nonconforming to the current requirement of 10% of lot width, or 3 feet. The south building wall is proposed to be maintained, leaving a side yard of 2.2 feet rather than 3 feet. The north side of the house includes a garage level storage area and entry landing above, and a rear bedroom, which are located on the north property line. The remodel plans call for correcting the yard problem at the bedroom, but to maintain the storage and landing area at the. property line. In considering the Variance requests, the Commission based their decision on the following required findings, as required by State and Local laws: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved. 2. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right .possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 3. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located 4. The Variance is consistent with the General Plan The Planning Commission determined that the findings could be made relative to the request for the south side yard, and further determined they could not be made for the north side yard. The unusual and unique circumstance of the existing structure and the location of the masonry fireplace in the middle of the structure was the basis for supporting the first finding. The existing two parking spaces fall on each side of the fireplace structure with adequate widths to comply with parking 2 requirements. The existing width of the southerly space could not be maintained if nonconforming yard was corrected. In considering removing or moving the fireplace structure, the integrity of the existing structure would be compromised, probably requiring complete demolition. The preservation of the fireplace was deemed a substantial property right, and was the basis for the second finding. Further, several other properties in the vicinity have been granted Variances to side yards to maintain similar property rights.' The fact that other similar side yards exist in the vicinity, and that Variances have been granted to maintain said yards in conjunction with expansion projects, was the basis for the third finding. Consistency and compatibility with surrounding single family projects all located in the same Low Density General Plan category was the basis for the fourth finding. Given the scale of the expansion/remodel project staff previously recommended that the applicant consider demolishing the existing house to build a new one, in complete compliance with zoning requirements. The applicant, however, proceeded with the plans as submitted in order to maintain the fireplace and entry landing. While findings for a Variance were made for the south side yard situation, as noted, the Commission did not believe findings could be made to justify a Variance for the north side yard. The structural issues were not the same, and further, since a new main entry will be available from the Myrtle Avenue side of the lot, and interior access is provided from the garage level, a substantial property right would not be lost. HEIGHT MEASUREMENT Because of the dispute about height determination in this case, including correspondence from neighboring property owners that the pre-existing corner point elevations should be used, the height calculation was referred to the Planning Commission Staff maintains that the project conforms to the maximum allowable height using the elevation at the nearest public improvement. In its original evaluation of this property for the basis of the height measurement along Myrtle Avenue the Building Division recognized that elevations at the east corner points, which are eight feet west of the Myrtle Avenue sidewalk, are on an abrupt slope, and also have been modified by added fill dirt mating it difficult to obtain accurate base elevations at these corner points. Given this circumstance, and the disrepair of the sidewalk, the elevation at the nearest public improvement was used (the flow line of the west gutter of Myrtle Avenue2) as the base for interpolating height from the upper side of the lot. This approach is consistent with the current definition for .grade, which in part states "In cases where there significant variation in elevations between adjacent properties at corner points the point of measurement shall be based on the nearest public improvement or an alternative point within 3 horizontal feet, which based on supporting evidence, represents existing unaltered grade." Staff maintains that the only nearby point which can safely be assumed to represent unaltered grade is the street elevation. There is only a slight difference (about 8 inches less at the top of the roof deck railing) between staffs method of calculating building height and the applicant's proposal (119.01 rather than 119.75). Also, in reviewing recent and past building construction along Myrtle Ave., the resulting two story scale and approximate 21 -foot height from the street level would be consistent with the scale of two other two story homes on the west side of the street. (The most recent project on the west side of the street, 2459 Myrtle, is also a two-story/three level project with a finished building height at approximately 21 feet from the street level. The building height for that project was interpolated from the east corner points at the choice of the architect, however, in that case if the street level would have been used it would have made little difference) 3 The Planning Commission rejected the option to require that the applicant to hire a soils engineer to use soil borings to establish the depth of the recent fill at the east corner points. With that information it would be possible to determine the base corner point elevations that existed before the recent fill, and either establish the height measurement based on that point, or, pursuant to the grade definition "in the absence of supporting evidence...at 1/2 the difference between the adjacent elevation and the elevation on the property in question." Either of these options, however, assume that the grade levels before the recent filling (8 -feet from the street) are good representations of unaltered grade, and ignore the possibility that erosion, excavation or cutting may have occurred since the streets were constructed. Summary of Options for Determining Grade for Height Measurement: 1. Refer to elevation of nearest public improvement. 2. Refer to elevation point within three horizontal feet of the corner point which based on evidence represents unaltered grade. 3. Utilize an elevation which is 1/2 the difference between the adjacent elevation and elevation in question at the corner point in the absence of supporting documentation. 4. Determine previous unaltered elevation for corner points based upon geotechnical study of unfilled and filled portions of property. 5. Use geotechnical study for southeasterly corner point where ground level may be historically lower than other locations along the block and use the existing corner point at northeasterly corner which is consistent with properties along the block. CONCUR: Sol Blume Community Stephen R. City Manager ector pment Department en obertson Associate Planner 'Variances were granted at other nearby properties to allow substantial expansions to existing structures while maintaining and extending nonconforming yards, as follows: 2432 Myrtle Avenue (side yards 2.6 and 2.7 feet rather than 3 feet and front yard of 2' rather than 5'); 318 24th Street (side yard of 2' rather than 3', front yard of 0' rather than 5'); and, 2418 Manhattan Avenue (side yards of 2.3' and 2.5' rather than 3'; front of 9.8' rather than 10', and rear yard of 2.3 feet rather than 3 feet) 2The nearest public improvement is actually the sidewallc, however, it is clearly in disrepair and has subsided and staff did not feel it would be appropriate to estimate the elevation of the sidewalk prior to this movement. Instead the westerly flow line was used as the best representation of unaltered grade . Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution to Sustain P.C. Decision 2. P.C. Minutes / Staff Report w/attachments 3. Correspondence: Applicant, and Neighbors KR/c/cc/sR2429 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FROM THE SOUTH SIDE YARD REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW A 2.2 -FOOT SIDE YARD TO REMAIN FOR A GREATER THAN 100 PERCENT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 24, TRACT 1031 WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 22, 1997, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the subject Variance and to consider oral and written testimony on the matter, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Variance at their meeting of June 17, 1997, and approved the request subject to conditions as contained in Planning Commission resolution 97-45, and; WHEREAS, after considering the decision of the Planning Commission and their record of decision, and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council agrees with the Planning Commission, and agrees with the findings and the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution 97-45, which are incorporated herein by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT TH1; CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN P.C. RESOLUTION 97-45 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1997, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY kr\c:\cc\rs2429 5 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 P.C. RESOLUTION 97-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SOUTH SIDE YARD REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW A 2.2 -FOOT SIDE YARD TO REMAIN FOR A GREATER THAN 100 PERCENT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, AND DENYING A REQUEST TO MAINTAIN NO SIDE YARD ON THE NORTH SIDE AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 24, TRACT 1031 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 17, 1997, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for the subject Variances and made the following findings for the requested south side yard Variance: A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances because of the location of existing structural elements, including the location of the fireplace structure, making it unusually difficult to modify the side yard and still complying with parking width requirements for two parking spaces; B. The Variance to extend into the side yard is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone; C. The granting of the Variance from the side yard setback will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located; D. The Variance is consistent with the General Plan. E. The granting of the Variance is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15305 as it involves a minor setback Variance, with the finding that the project does not result in any changes in land use or density. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings for the requested north side yard Variance; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances because the structure can be easily modified to eliminate the storage area/stairway landing located in the side yard; B. TheVariance to extend into the side yard is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone; C. The granting of the variance from the side yard setback may potentially be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Variance to allow the south side yard of 2.2 feet to remain, and hereby deny the requested Variance for the north side yard, subject to the following conditions: SECTION I Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The project shall be consistent with submitted plans modified pursuant to the conditions noted below. Any further minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. a) Plans shall be revised to comply with the minimum required 3 -foot side yard requirement along the north side yard. 2. The Variance is specifically limited to the existing 2.2 -foot south side yard, and applicable to the situation and circumstances that result relative to the proposed expansion and remodeling of the existing structure, including the maintenance of the existing fireplace structure, and is not applicable to the development of new structures or any future expansion. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comms.Perrotti, Pizer, Chmn.Tucker Comms.Schwartz, Merl None None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 97-45 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of June 17, 1997. L Peter Tucker, ,Chairman Date c/winword/pc/rs2429 r- Chmn. Tucker closed the public hearing at 9:07 p.m. Discussion Comm. Perrotti . de some calculations concerning the variance and the lot cover the maximum is 65 p - ent and the proposal is 69.7 percent which is a differe feet. Churn. Tucker co - nted on the porch on the north side, which is Director Blumenfeld said the . ircase needs to have about a five -foo conform to the Building Code if r- 'laced. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by plus reducing to three-quarter bath the guest r eliminating the guest room exterior entrance. . He said of 47 square de out of metal. iameter and needs to Perrot o APPROVE Staff recommendation AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: A break was t Comms. Merl, Perro Churn. Tucker None None en at 9:18 p.m. d add the condition for the fire window and izer, Schwartz The ' . nning Commission meeting reconvened at 9:28 p.m. 12. VARIANCE TO ALLOW EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARDS OF 0 FEET AND 2.2 FEET RATHER THAN REQUIRED THREE FEET TO BE MAINTAINED FOR A GREATER THAN 100 PERCENT REMODEL AND EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSIDERATION OF BUILDING HEIGHT AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE. Staff recommended action: To approve 2.2' side yard, deny 0' side yard, and direct staff as deemed appropriate relative to establishing the base elevation for measuring project height at the flow line of the nearest public improvement (street). Director Blumenfeld said there were three issues requiring resolution; a Variance request to maintain the 2.2' side yard, the base elevation for measuring building height at the flow line of the nearest public improvement and direction by minute order, on the proposed garage expansion, because it currently does not meet minimum interior depth requirements and it would have to be reconfigured slightly to meet the minimum requirements. Director Blumenfeld noted that four findings are required to grant the Variance; that there are exceptional at or extraordinary circumstances which effect the property that do not pertain to other properties in the same vicinity and zone and that to deny this request would deny the preservation and enjoyment of a property right. He noted that staff concurred with applicants' request, given the proposed remodel is reasonable in size. The project conforms to the basic zoning requirements but for a side yard Variance request, and is not unlike other similar Variances in the area. He further noted the code provides for various methods for determining grade based upon the corner point elevations. He 8 P.C. Minutes 6-17-97 i! indicated staffs recommendation approving the requested Variance to maintain the 2.2' side yard but denying maintaining the 0' side yard and requesting direction by minute order relative to the height issue and the proposed garage extension with respect to the minimum interior depth. Chmn. Tucker opened the public hearing at 9:37 p.m. Jim Berry, 2429 Myrtle Avenue, said their intention is to retain the best features of the existing house and to build a new addition, which they think will create a desirable house and improve the neighborhood. He said they have removed all the windows. Because there has been substantial erosion on the property, it is not possible to determine elevation with a survey. Drawings submitted to the city are based on height calculation using the nearest public improvement, the near edge of the sidewalk. John Dunbabin, 2432 Myrtle Avenue, distributed some items to the Council. He said he is completely against the variance on the side yard and was upset with the adding of the four feet of dirt on the property. He said the original corner points are now covered up with four feet of dirt. He stated the Berrys should conform to the code, and the only true, fair, and equitable way to measure the property is to follow the Building Code. Dan Valenzuela, 2424 Myrtle Avenue, said he authored the April 30th, 1997 document, which deals primarily with the height issue, and he said the primary problem with the Variances in this case is that it will result in a 135 percent addition when compared to the nonconforming structure. He said the Berrys indicate that their neighbor has an adverse possession of an easement right on the south side of their property of 2.2 feet and that for the past 70 years their neighbor has been using that as their driveway. Assuming that is correct, the neighbor could also have an adverse possession to title to that property. Under today's code, if he decided to develop'that property, he could then build to almost within three feet of the Berry structure. One way to solve this problem is that the Berrys could buy eight inches of property from their neighbor but he isn't sure if that's feasible. Bo Weber, 2848 Myrtle Avenue, said they basically need to have a three-foot setback. A large project such as this needs to conform to current zoning laws. The dirt issue has really confused the city on the height and how to figure the height. A geotechnical survey may be needed. Kathy Dunbabin, 2432 Myrtle Avenue, suggested that perhaps if they could dig down and get the elevation from the concrete steps. Tim Berry, 2429 Myrtle Avenue, said a geotechnical survey isn't appropriate or a previous survey of the property that indicates the height is not appropriate because of the erosion that's occurred on the property. A couple of houses on Myrtle will be developed a lot lower than the other ones which is unfair. Essentially the neighbors are trying to use their house as a precedent to unreasonably restrict the height of new houses built in front of their houses. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the public hearing at 10:02 p.m. 9 P.C. Minutes 6-17-97 Discussion Comm. Perrotti said the fireplace could be considered a substantial property right, and he agreed with Staff on the height issue. Churn. Tucker agreed with Staff on their recommendation as to where the grade is. He said the applicant is willing to alleviate the side yard problem on the north side, and they should be granted the variance on the south side. MOTION by Comm. Perrotti, seconded by Comm. Schwartz, that the nearest public improvement be used as grade. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Conuns. Merl, Perrotti, Pizer, Schwartz, Chmn. Tucker None None None MOTION by Comm. Perrotti, seconded by Comm. Pizer, to ALLOW the variance for the south 2.2 feet deny the 0' sideyard Variance on the north and find that the garage is a functional part of the building and allow it at 17.6 feet. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comms. Perrotti, Pizer, Chmn. Tucker Comms. Schwartz, Merl None None Churn. Tucker stated that these decisions are appealable to the City Council within 10 days. 13. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD MASSAGE THERAPY AS COND I NAL P Staff Reco D USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES. ded Action: To recommend City Council a Director Blumenfeld stated tha recommended proceeding with the t conditionally permitted use in the C-2 an Council amend the Zoning Ordinance to de conditionally permitted use in the C-2 a licensing provisions and minimal r amendment seeks to make thi subject the use to a cond. recommendations fo dealt with this i recommend Staff r the previ am ous Commissi endment t -3 z rt. royal. meeting the Commission onsider adding massage therapy as a s. Recommendations are made that City add massage therapy businesses as a d that the City Council add special h a business. This proposed text d C-3 zones and would also ment. There are also cities, which have ams C-3 zone irements to operate permitted use in either the C - nal use permit as part of the permit requ censing and Staff has looked to some of the adjac e, in order to compile the provisions of licensing. Indicatin on is to approve the text amendment and the licensing provisions as o Churn. Tucker opened the public hearing at 10:26 p.m. 10 ed in the P.C. Minutes 6-17-97 if June 11, 1997 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 17,1997 SUBJECT: VARIANCE 97-3 LOCATION: 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE APPLICANT: JIM BERRY 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA REQUESTS: VARIANCES TO ALLOW EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARDS OF 0' AND 2.2' RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 3 FEET TO BE MAINTAINED FOR A GREATER THAN 100% REMODEL AND EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CONSIDERATION OF BUILDING HEIGHT Recommendations 1. To approve the requested variance to maintain the 2.2 foot south side yard, but to deny maintaining the 0 -foot north side yard. 2. To direct staff as deemed appropriate by minute order relative to establishing the base for measuring building height. 3. Confirm by minute order that the proposed garage extension is functionally part of the existing building. Background ZONING: R-1 GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential LOT SIZE: 2,993 square feet EXISTING USE: Single-family dwelling' EXISTING FLOOR AREA: 1,478 square feet PROPOSED FLOOR AREA: 3,396 Square Feet PERCENT INCREASE IN VALUATION: 135% The subject lot is located on the west side of Myrtle Avenue with access from the west on Ozone Court. The lot slopes fairly steeply to towards the ocean from Myrtle Avenue to Ozone Court, with an elevation change of about 15 feet, with most of this change on an abrupt slope just west of Myrtle Avenue. The lot is currently developed with a one-story (two levels) single-family dwelling located on the low, westerly portion of the lot. The dwelling has no record of duplex use'. The existing dwelling 11 1 2 t was constructed in 1922 and is currently nonconforming to side yard requirements on both sides of the lot. The applicant is proposing a substantial remodel and expansion project, involving the removal of the rear walls and rear (easterly) portions of the existing house and the construction of three new levels east of the existing dwelling. The project incorporates a new entry and orientation on Myrtle Avenue, and maximizes height up the slope to take advantage of ocean views. Analysis Existing side yards are nonconforming to the current requirement of 10% of lot width, or 3 feet. The north side of the house includes a garage level storage area and entry landing above, and rear bedroom which are located on the north property line. The remodel plans call for correcting the yard problem at the bedroom, but to maintain the storage and landing area at the property line. The south building wall is continuous along the whole south side of the building, leaving a side yard of 2.2 feet rather than 3 feet, which is proposed to be maintained. In order to grant a variance, the Commission must make the following findings: • There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved. • The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right .possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. • The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located • The variance is consistent with the General Plan The applicant's request is based on the premise that to maintain the integrity of the existing structure the fireplace cannot be moved. Therefore, the parking spaces must fall on each side of the fireplace, making the correcting of nonconforming yards a structural problem. While this may be true for the south yard, it is not the case for the north side since a storage area, stairway and landing structure could be removed to comply with the 3 -foot yard. This applicant argues that this serves as his only safe egress onto Ozone Court. The applicant has also indicated he is willing to eliminate the storage and convert it to a stairway and landing only (i.e. an 8 -foot high concrete landing with stairs on both sides) which would make it a variance from the maximum height for a stairway landing in the side yard (4 feet) rather than a yard variance. Given the scale of the expansion/remodel project staff previously recommended that the applicant consider demolishing the existing house to build a new one, in complete compliance with zoning requirements. The applicant, however, has proceeded with the plans as submitted in order to maintain the fireplace and entry landing. While findings for a Variance are possible for the south side yard situation, given the existing physical constraints of the fireplace, staff does not believe any findings can possibly made to justify a Variance for south side yard or extra high landing in the south side yard. Further a new main entry will be available from the Myrtle Avenue side of the lot and interior access is provided from the garage level to the main floor via an interior stairway. The project also proposes to modify the nonconforming existing two -car garage (with a current sub- standard depth of about 17.5 feet) to extend outward 1 foot to be flush with the base of the masonry 4-1 chimney structure. This is necessary to comply with the exception allowed for existing 18 -foot depth garages, pursuant to Section 17.44.140 of the Zoning Ordinance, to qualify for an exception to the 20 - foot depth and guest parking requirement. Since the existing garage depths do not actually comply with that exception, the proposal needs a supportive interpretation by the Commission, that this 1 -foot extension is functionally part of the existing building. HEIGHT MEASUREMENT In its original evaluation of this property for the basis of the height measurement along Myrtle Avenue the Building Division recognized that elevations at the east corner points, which are eight feet west of the Myrtle Avenue sidewalk, are on an abrupt slop, and also have been modified by added fill dirt making it difficult to obtain accurate base elevations at these corner points. Given this circumstance, and the disrepair of the sidewalk, the elevation at the nearest public improvement was used (the flow line of the west gutter of Myrtle Avenue) as the base for interpolating height from the upper side of the lot. This approach was consistent with past practices for sloping lots, and consistent with the current definition for grade, which in part states 'In cases where there significant variation in elevations between adjacent properties at corner points the point of measurement shall be based on the nearest public improvement or an alternative point within 3 horizontal feet, which based on supporting evidence, represents existing unaltered grade." Staff's position is that the only nearby point which can safely be assumed represents unaltered grade since the street was constructed, is the street elevation itself. The applicant's proposal reflects an approach to interpolate from the Myrtle Avenue estimated original sidewalk grade. The reason the applicant is requesting this approach is to be consistent with a height calculation that was done for 2459 Myrtle Avenue. Also, the grade of the sidewalk is estimated since erosion underneath the sidewalk has caused it to subside. Staff's method of calculation results in only a slight difference from the applicant's method, resulting in a maximum height of about 8 inches less at the top of the roof deck railing (119.01 rather than 119.75). Otherwise, the rest of the building, as proposed, would fall within the maximum height per staff's approach. Also, in reviewing recent and past building construction along Myrtle, the resulting two story scale and approximate 21 -foot height from the street level would be consistent with the scale of of two other two story homes on the west side of the street. (The most recent project on the west side of the street, 2459 Myrtle, is also a two-story/three level project with a finished building height at approximately 21 feet from the street level. It appears building height for that project was interpolated from the east corner points at the choice of the architect. However, in that case if the street level would have been used it would have made little difference) A possible option would be to require the applicant to hire a soils engineer to use soil borings to establish the depth of the recent fill at the east corner points. With that information it would be possible to determine the base corner point elevations that existed before the recent fill, and either base the height measurement on that point, or pursuant to the grade definition where supporting evidence is lacking at 1/2 the difference between the adjacent elevation and the elevation on the property in question." Either of these options, however, assume that the grade levels before the recent filling (8 • - feet from the street) are good representations of unaltered grade, and ignore the possibility that erosion, excavation or cutting may have occurred since the streets were constructed. Because of the dispute about height determination in this case, including correspondence from neighboring property owners that the pre-existing corner point elevations should be used, the height calculation is being referred to the Planning Commission. Summary of Options for Determining Grade for Height Measurement: 1. Refer to elevation of nearest public improvement. 2. Refer to elevation point within three horizontal feet of the corner point which based on evidence represents unaltered grade. 3. Utilize an elevation which is 1/2 the difference between the adjacent elevation and elevation in question at the corner point in the absence of supporting documentation. 4. Determine previous unaltered elevation for corner points based upon geotechnical study of unfilled and filled portions of property. 5. Use geotechnical study for southeasterly corner point where ground level may be historically lower than other locations along the block and use the existing corner point at northeasterly corner which is consistent with properties along the block. Ken Robertson CONCUR: Associate Planner Michael Schubl6h City Planner Sol Bfumenfel 1, Di`ector Community D velopment Department 'The applicant has noted that the property maintains an existing right for a duplex. According to building permit records, and the Residential Building Report when the Berry's purchased the property, there is only 1 unit. Further, if there was any nonconforming duplex use in the past, it has long lost legal nonconforming status since the use has not been maintained, and no second kitchen exists. Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Correspondence: Applicant, and Neighbors KR/sr2429 14 2b o .2s rN RADIUS MAP 2429 MYRTLE AVE. S A N DATE' 6'5-" 9 77 CASE N0• SCALE: /". /00' Jim and Jane Berry 2429 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: (310) 798 9919 Fax: (310) 798 9939 July 17, 1997 re: Request for Variances for Remodel and Addition at 2429 Myrtle Ave. Dear City Council Members, RECEIVED JUL 1 71997 PLANNING DEPT. We are planning a substantial remodel of our home at 2429 Myrtle Avenue. Our project will upgrade the existing house and add an addition. Since our project retains two pre-existing non -conformities which require exceptions to the strict application of zoning ordinances, we applied for two variances. At our planning commission hearing one of the variances we requested was granted. We were told that the we would not need the second variance if we built a new stairway under six feet high. People who live behind us who's ocean view may be affected by our addition, have asked to appeal the south sideyard variance in an attempt to gain more "negotiating power" with respect to your determination of the method used to determine building height. Please note that the owners of the adjacent properties on both sides our lot agree that these variances should be granted. As required, we address each of the four variance finding areas for our two variance items as follows: ITEM # 1 Allow the existing 32 foot long south exterior wall to remain, extending 0.8 ft into the required side yard For fire safety, all windows will be removed from this wall, except for two upstairs windows which will be inset to the required three foot setback. The closest structure is 9.5 ft from this existing wall and the owner of that property is supportive of this variance (Attachment 1). All other exterior walls will have fully compliant side yards. 1. Special Circumstances: Our existing building was constructed in about 1922. The side yard requirements were not the same then as they are today.. We have investigated taking 0.8 ft off the existing structure. This would make the south garage too narrow and propagate many other changes including removal of a large fireplace and chimney. The most practical approach would then be to demolish the existing house. We would then rebuild essentially the house we already have. This change would add more than $50,000 to our project, and add very little benefit. We considered purchasing a 0.8 ft x 32 ft portion of 227 24th Street to widen our side yard. The community development department advised against this. 2. Property rights possessed by other properties in the same area: Many other properties in our zone and neighborhood have side yards smaller than currently required. Some of these properties have recently received variances from the city to obtain building permits for additions that have created houses with similar livable square footage as we propose. A comparison of our proposed property and others in our neighborhood follows: 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE ( Our Proposed Home 1 LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS 3000 sq.ft. 3396 sq.ft. south side: 0.8 ft X 30 ft (proposed) 2432 MYRTLE AVENUE LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS 2550 sq.ft. 2754 sq.ft. date granted: 3/2/81 792 sq.ft. remodel permit: 4/28/88 south side: 0.3 ft X —55 ft north side: 0.4 ft X —55 ft front: 3.0 ft 318 24TH STREET LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS 3267 sq.ft. 3188 sq.ft. dates granted: 7/21/80 & 12/22/88 Encroachment permit: 3/28/91 east side: 1.0 ft X —25ft front: 5.OftX-27ft 2418 HERMOSA AVENUE LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS 3000 sq.ft. 4455 sq.ft. date granted: 7/1/85 south side: 0.7 ft X —87 ft north side: 0.5 ft X —87 ft front: 0.2 ft X 25 ft rear: 0.73 ft X 25 ft Note that these variances granted much larger areas of non -conformity than ours and they did not include fire safety improvements. We are requesting that 32 ft. (15%) of one side yard be non- conforming by 0.8 ft. The rest of our set backs will be conforming. 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 2 3. Variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare: The primary reason for the side yard set back is fire safety and access between adjacent structures. Since there is no structure within 9.5 ft ( Photo A )of the wall, this is not currently an issue. Fire fighter access and occupant egress is also not an issue for the same reason. Assuming a future structure is built three feet from the property line, fire fighter access and occupant egress will still be very good, since a 5.2 ft wide space will be available between the structures. Fire ladder lean angles at 25 ft will still be shallower than for a 6 ft space for 30 or 35 foot high buildings. To maximize the future fire safety of this wall we will remove all windows from the lower floor, as well as all but two of the upper story windows. These two remaining windows will be set into the wall such that their. external surface is three feet from the property line. Considering the lack of windows in the wall, the fire safety of our wall may exceed most new conforming external walls. This variance only applies to 15% (32 feet out of a total of 216 feet) of the outside perimeter of the house. The remaining 85% is fully compliant. 4. Variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan: No adverse effect on the comprehensive General Plan has been identified. Overall, our conversion of a non -conforming duplex into an attractive single family home will be positive. It will reduce density while improving housing quality, safety, and aesthetics. Additional Considerations: The owner of the adjacent property agrees that we should be granted this variance. The city community development staff recommended that the variance should be granted. The planning commission voted to grant us this variance on June 17, 1997 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 3 ITEM#2: Allow a 5.9 ft. high stairway and landing in the north side yard For fire safety we will replace an existing wooden stairway, landing, and storage area in the north side yard with a 5.9 ft. high solid concrete stairway and landing which provides full side yard access in both directions. Code requires a four foot height. 1. Special Circumstances: Our proposed project creates a single family home with a courtyard between the remodeled existing home and the new addition. A back door is required for safe egress from the first floor in the case of a fire in the courtyard, garage, or south side of the house. Additionally, a back door makes it more convenient to access the beach and Ozone Court from the house. In order to provide for a back door, without going through the garage, the existing stair must be retained. Our existing stairway used at our house since it was constructed in 1922 is made of wood and it's 7.5 ft. height exceeds the 4 ft. maximum height above grade allowed for a sideyard stairways. Due to reduction of north garage ceiling heights we can only lower the height of the new landing to 5.9 ft. 2. Property rights possessed by other properties in the same area: Many properties in our zone and neighborhood have access to the first floor using stairs over four feet in height located in the side yard. Many of these existing stairs are not fire resistant. Recent projects have also incorporated or upgraded such stairs as follows: 2460 MYRTLE AVENUE Granted a building permit for a substantial remodel on 4/1/93. Under this permit the stairs (Photo B) to this property were fire protected as we propose, but do not offer the side yard access modifications we are proposing. 2212 HERMOSA AVENUE Remodeled in 1995/1996, it's stairs are shown in Photo C. 2533 MYRTLE AVENUE This house, including the stairs shown in Photo D, was built under a permit granted 4/18/85. Other properties have been granted rights far beyond our request. For example: 2432 MYRTLE AVENUE Granted a variance on 3/2/81 to allow a stairway which projects into the front yard area. Currently, this stairway (photo E) also projects into the side yard and is constructed of wood. There is 'no record of these non -conformities being corrected during a remodel performed under a permit granted 4/28/88. 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 4 3. Variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare: The height and construction of stairs in the side yard is limited by code to improve fire safety between adjacent structures, and to provide for easy side yard access for fire fighters and egressing occupants. We propose to replace the existing stairway and landing with one made of fully fireproof solid concrete construction. We also add a stairway to the east end of the landing leading down to the grade to allow pedestrian traffic through the side yard in both directions. These stairs additionally increase fire safety by providing an additional safe egress.route for occupants of the house. We propose to replace the existing 7.5 ft. high landing with one built as low as possible, 5.9 ft. high. This is only 1.9 feet over the maximum allowed by code and is the only non -conformity associated with this variance. The result of our modifications will protect the public welfare. We will create a stairway and side yard which is safer than it currently is, and also much safer than most in the area. 4. Variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan: No adverse effect on the comprehensive General Plan has been identified. Our project will reduce density while improving housing quality, safety, and aesthetics. Additional Considerations: The owner of the adjacent property agrees that we should be granted this variance. We requested a variance to retain and fireproof our existing stairway during the June 17, 1997 planning commission meeting. A discussion of the issue between the planning commission and staff concluded that if we could re -build our stairway and landing out of solid concrete, a maximum of 6 ft. tall, we would not need a variance. Our architect stated that we could do that. We agreed work with staff on this, so the planning commission did not vote on this variance. The next week, staff confirmed that the real requirement was for 4 ft. not 6 ft. and we could not re- build our stair without a variance. Since we can only practically reduce the height to 5.9 ft., we are requesting the city council to grant us this variance. In summary, we are requesting two minor variances. In both cases we have made provisions such that the end product will meet the intent of the building codes. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 5 /716 4) t - Lloyd Theodore 421 Sth Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 May 19, 1997 Sol Blumenfeld Director, Community Development City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, My neighbors Jim and Jane Berry plan to build an addition to their house at 2427/29 Myrtle Avenue in Hermosa Beach. I have reviewed the plans and understand that they intend to leave about 30 feet of the south wall of their existing house intact. The wall is 2.2 feet from the property line between their property and my property at 227 24th Street, and will not fully comply with the three foot side yard set back in this area. This is acceptable to me. Please feel free to provide copies of this letter to city officials reviewing the Berry's building permit. t/ ,y,467d, loy Theodore c.c. Jim and Jane Berry G% 2 /`�r}'�� Avg U�!'i� ?-ec(kJe57- - AY-466iiie_4± 24f 29 114*-I1e �Je vs/4 ne,.e A5 e 2J 1CD II YgTI E l I a 1 Co iSISdit 419s T wST k) 1 �'I�9 J1 i 22 23� 2 4;3.00 42,0c ORIGINAL PRoPERTY LIN GRADE MARSH 1,1911 BAST 1L OF MYRTLE AVENUE 13J oRG,WAL. PRETTY LINE GRADE MARCH 111711 WEST & OF MYRTLE AVENUE ,465--oo 63.00 - 5 ft —IOffi Cory we poivlt elevq-lioh firoei 6vrb Gtacle eovvi cvrb '31-61.e.A.,Jak ih+erpAtiao F1,1 ih-ferpok-itov) qc.) ca,c. • / Cu{ , • +o Wes. Secif 00 at NO rtli Goroer poivir elevi+100 UV 6 Crick Luvla Saekettk Ititerrlatiov, riow Coe !v)terpoiel-flOv9 Bloc -t< u\Afl 0 k hdeweilk Seetiao qt Soutli sit <.< Foot Yq rd .R6 to- cv— 144i 1..J.e iv 91 K /q-osAl &P 29z7 i'lyr`. Ave: OOG House at 21/57 r t,,i k Ave. Propos House 4f 24/29 Myrtle 'wl ti 6r,de Lo,,.ereJ 40 Leve/ Proposed by Aunbabins Myrtle /i&W✓e. Curb 1dwArArrn ����Mvrtle f}vea✓e Curb U.� i v%! i /o 29S I ,4yr{/e Clewje s #o Item fetvq,e ry Myrtle /4,e, ie Cvrb �ns� $w+lk rt avrveyed e F;:,vre 1 Proposed HavSe Ekv #,'an totnpareJ i i/,e //Li' Reace,id/y C/ 99t) $wl! f/ouse an oke,GJe S�g O Myrtle Propose/ liovse is ec/av//y y Houses 5.,117 Q.( ilecenf/y &%ll %Muse) :S 116 las ee that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS .21. 0 N I--- o 2..cr4 4 41°3 26ST A e.¢.rv►cs`� • '' e-1 C4- 4 -%tud/ - S & y{///> 2.5 hr' -A- 6 3 23—'1 Xe -,--‘-- ,;. 11W4 dij I c.'1/L% -(1,,L7- I •`/_ 1 go,m,,s7 t f/Gyri-yU � ✓:.,% A-/144 c kV yl/s-- /7 STA 7i `i,'L''-..Sq_ A;.-: Cit 1) .st(zmz. 4.e--' 315 //d/0d *wrnoon _ elS 10``"C -61e�15,s 1. oi, 4,1 , --a__________, / 74i; r,,A //6"-) A0470, lz,,,, /-6,4,.., i-, i 25 Pi,,,-- 'vc 1-4 8 1 6 6 O d-744, 11' I- i-- 12, pd.', 2,-„e tze,,, iod-ts'..„ fLu 6Avirl SIZE kiln P /00f //;4 --tor& &.clD /1 3, /1/ l Bryn • leo, dice re)r) B/a� OR c� u c_ .Sct\ rcA def- ( sW u),14...et v t' i) s� li\vta, is -?-q C hv Ji- ____ i 3 dll . ///.0,1, g (vrt o 1 . — d 1 ‘-./2.1-/) ("a2, -‘)-e '9,4/4,4R/L0,1/ 62d-)0 7 (I" r -t , O ft ! 49-7,-71- t 3 - sl- iris CP - ‘'/IL (At //t.'"L" Y -1, -L‘ ger - '-,1,:t> 025y —r dt, We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS 1/6 ' ZA/rihr, fr' //.176 - c.q17 51 limii-44,A7 '2 q;: Co7c vpGi--, ea -4-)30, �� r('' / 7$ 3A40< /�- .: 114>-1- MJ%41J 7/5 V -ow_ A g MPRK ADA m q (cog moN- E -( H- . B, 4_f5 c mroiR I6zZ i3A� ui&rte PR. 1 :�. / //1t4ei( b C-.e-a1e3 ePi/ e /Ales if a' / 9-��5'7 Hit e,>,,,c,%, / Hov, 7 2vAVE 141 4/ A f 0- .i 275J gi'''d 5e\,) i46S 2q3/ Q r crsmil fr q3b OZ,bilficr 1177 /- j. 6,).p ANIF, 8-. Feio , ____________"/ 5___T ,0 t(i4,(0A,_,,_ ao;k1 afrkeliti_ zo--1-1.1- acts a .0--h si-rci24 LYrda Sexk-ov - , acoai mo� Rvoz i) _ \R-c.v )-5s-'z hun kkikh i1/4 -v-1_, A0 C0.vr- ._ 2 s' N\\ c .0 'At lt,tjeN OLD i Y-1 V r 62-(66` dki L GAA110.25-40 �, ,, Pli -IYI- .ti -M . , 122 - 2-g41- 6- k '. We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS ,(5 We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS c fr16-i 1 lzs 1-7 57P44 Aof 0.fi2MMo5 Kill Se/Li-Acker 4JiL%(7 O0,.,2_ TIi .0 mil 14erwe—s9 & lkii-4-775 1 ,, The cS-rraitcre ff-,449, JAI/0,41A- \../f - J >e,27, Avi6 IL/ Y .1:1C-6 ; P. t,,- 6 .20 sq 014 gtj -1-1,24-1‘ l� svif}e, e\f- rt7 Et 0.--k Wit` rc.dz ('-..;r, H' - e Am./el-64,e A-Aa6 r /yrs Maxtr--g -y 3zvA H. r3 i -24-n//< U, A2.8O,957" ,2-/03 , 20.3 i"1a,o�E.QE SII v.v, 14..e e.grio-2k-l ko >r )1 "11' ere 1uol !,9_,/q --)-f Mo&yI t s� (-_,\ v Lam- We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS •0 l fr: t- , i , b.L, - A 6 tz 6J6 974. _c7. (-il c>. , /42 7u._ ., 6' Vi 9 - , „ , s& es.-/ /4,,yynb7:01-14 v , 4s9 CT- -HeUww._-- / / ys /el f fir- it �e a�4 161 5z % iVer,wosaSeetai ems 7k- 5-0 /6-15 fii.c.,0 , ,P--c-arc .-A�� on get :- �. fri- 13-41 ',.z� kx,1,2, /ST _ qi cit -14. 779 We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS �)0ik l gch �0S ; i,2 ' ,% .4.,L..._.� Z S DA, . #4. /, r(ape:eept • . % • R 12/3-0-57J4-\ 1 ' - b,i---- f a,041"-------- -1-4f s r p,ua, 0,,,tils ,,e---4---4.- A/5 a- ,T,-.4- /iV40,,,, /7-,--- - A i / -`-t- xna.,A,a - 4ii ,,,/se ioca,,„ = fr.", / 0(4-3;-,A11,4,700r. AAP edi, „,2 Ppgeiti bie__._ • a/14o-- i ' Pct -e,, -Dv 74- . t_l 2•3Sl mai ux aaA/ a iC-at il- OIL -.94). ZLIS0 ik--lc..,),., k,. atA t tit) WailA--,,k 2i-KitrY)oriNgivida-60' fb()). 24iq-A-0 WA -FM -0 - -c-,, . NO" -�/ 09' A% / -E, r We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS '60ifeiq-H- 322 - Eet/en41-1 1- '2rnaCo ' /‹.4-1f40 - G / " 54 v4Ta4-f: t,o,,r ,e, ,, 10 lV 9j ; 0— /-7.er,r 405/ 4 I k'\\.er C. 1ck5 (wkc , a) 24 i ( Prospect A 4.0207 /4 11 902 .sL e.,./41//_ 9,1/ P/l �_, ./O i , ✓ t.[��✓�&•_i _g, - 94g6 -2---c;---L p(Kb.t.-z7--10; Pri44 r Jd °\ g' r ).Zer-pLa.---6,e, ' ifife,iv-sd-igai ig ?9-- 9 . / - C,<) Er g36414.48Lu-c,.H �'o, \ kkssel on 14 eAltior c,),(-12} 6% iiiiii--eiN7 7i/4.114,AI/00-y k t o Mr 136 f/og 13(vi/ U a lo) S c-( tf C i 4 Posh- e - ,E7 lorivi ,ok. ki .3 ,ozsc r,. > - 6, w/2J9 . /e % v 4©/y,4- ply 11/3. ?oma--s`�r DP Pg<K•ft-L. 53( f % S' W g . 56 96(95--V- `� YO 6II '4%4 kAlAa 'n v4 vki5 q0ab- !'rz/ �`l• _ II1 Ai .l - /6\03h1 oi a-,..1, F2Z,_ar—e,-„..— ,.,.I a / // ff(9 L-°' i* Aiii#1 1025; / ; fie(' 1-441Ar' * q4.-7-/- f i nem i4) eataan I I. /, l a 3 tf� P- ea41 . f v ,./. s/ , �-- , , ,/ I z A. o. - . We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS /34/Yelilk r/e1/6- 7-I (7.-1/1/L dkVe/tel i72(A1-1(- 644/1.4D8L-- 54" J r f "70 kick o,A `V s' -e G) #5 Itel viet:�f, 375 -2/0-357--.4,,_„,,,,,,,6.,,a,„&„...2,5 , - - _ '`, �4Cs �� aria -`/a GI Z , //0,,tOted '-° r2 DO , -c-(- 6 We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS '/� /1 �4/ o 5sir% /2/�;�� _ ../✓/«��s 0 L 02 65 s S Ar'05, h oil r7/4,Z -I . , Aq------ 1v2& Loi- e:" J r.: a .0 , s- : 1I -7,3-4 . ,%A1/. / j V Igd$ ..' 0 '-, kkj Oli , n11/2_ St . 116 ► rC 7�Le�7, o _,:l ,• 21-lC Q*_o 4 43 ,/ 2// , 7 / /l& ., or --,,, q_ct---s-z- 5-,-- k ,, 41IWA,... .... .Y- Sz,f- m. / 7a-- ik, , flag . IF` z I. Cs()--:- ...., _ im c.L.� r. 9-_k cL\3'\ 0-z�-•�� ,_/J_ 2_,,,,,, 0 ZoN�' / ' Z � , � eicg Apt, g D2 -e ---c c` 1 6 fry C 6 4. i wo ,23e5x.e64, i —fiw. 0‘)_(/ irit 5 i.). 4, ____ 1 ......„e___________ ipt)Asio, is) bay 6 ;1te- it I ivla►►nhoi1-+O ►' A-ve, _, ' s"---5-- 1/0--72- /-7/-/ .X/-, z We agree that Jim and Jane Berry should be able to renovate their home, as approved by the Planning Commission on June 17th, 1997. NAME ADDRESS /, . 4_c, 6.4, -em -q-712 2, (- i iii- iJ jv, ise, R---v-j)\7' a,a/( Y S % u: \--kismor—P1c d, , Ng r .1 4,44",_ �4 b2 &apzeb--i-v,A ...-- _, 2 --ado 40/44 DR 216 0n,.-ej Q Q,, cI _ Ik.Q Ack a r G i LOcutkfrs tuicsz Pdc_ A-0 H i0c6,6,51-)r)cri_o -y340, 6riolotvc, v\cA, 64) � - .: -I6 r'-- , y- .4so parK ,. 1' R, C ??- /1. , .7,cts0 eivik4e_. 4 a4gg . f2ras gat dm d rag .Couctuaf' elfat ' 1 a\cfalk ' 43t*.__ 4-zi 2_5 -Psi, ,15, LA, cto2.54 Jt or oioi,'j iL1J.•aocrk7et41o3s�l t,, - °[ragf' _iEG f??gl1C. CdZ 7-`15.e.StLfvGk.S7YL.A,NO . %S-'(.. ..;(.1. -el 1 .P�//° / oZ Lf 9g Sliver 5tr d Ebel ,I(PAR( a (94/4-0-, qa zs y 07--97 LAW OFFICES fFR€Emfln, fk€€mfln & SMILEY, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE LOS ANGELES OFFICE ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE ONE MARKET PENTHOUSE, SUITE 1200 2010 MAIN STREET, SUITE 580 STEUART TOWER, I6TH FLOOR 3415 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90034-6060 TELEPHONE (714) 833-7966 TELEPHONE (415).974-1.930. - TELEPHONE (310) 398-6227 - FACSIMILE (714) 833-9584 FACSIMILE (310) 391-4042 - REFER TO FILE NO. 12480.800 July 22, 1997 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: Los Angeles WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL: Re: Appeal of Variance and Building Height Determination Relating to Real Property Owned by Jim and Jane Berry Located at 2429 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California Ladies and Gentlemen: This office has been retained by Jim and Jane Berry in connection with the above -referenced matter. We have received and reviewed- the various filings submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach in. this matter by or on behalf of appellants Daniel F. Valenzuela, Kathy and John Dunbabin- and Bo Webber (collectively, the "Appellants"), and we have the following comments and responses: - 1. The Appellants have submitted voluminous unsubstantiated and hearsay allegations to the City Council in an attempt to shift the City Council's focus away from the elements and criteria that are appropriate for review in this appeal context. Many of the Appellants' allegations are patently false. However, rather than waste the City Council's time with a specific written rebuttal to each specific falsehood set forth in the Appellants' papers (except with respect to the "filling" at the property which is addressed in item 2 below), the Berrys are prepared to addressand respond to each of the Appellants' specific factual allegations at the City Council hearing on this matter, if requested to do so. 2. The Appellants would have the City Council believe that the Berrys have acted improperly or nefariously in obtaining the variance and other ruling which they received from the Planning LAW OFFICES fQEfmfln, f .EEmfln & SMILEY, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS City Council of Hermosa Beach July 22, 1997 Page 2 Commission. For example, the Appellants have characterized the dirt filling which the Berrys performed at the property as illegal. However, the filling which has occurred was at all times permissible and legal, and was performed during hours when the Berrys' actions were plainly visible to the public (including various neighbors in the vicinity of the subject property). Finally, the fill was performed for the benefit of, among other parties, the City of Hermosa Beach and neighboring residents, inasmuch as the fill helped slow erosion of the slope of the property and the deterioration of the adjacent sidewalk areas. 3. Notwithstanding the Appellants' attempt to mislead the City Council, we respectfully request that the City Council remain. focussed on the specific statutory requirements that are appropriate for review in this matter. In this regard, we agree with the Planning Commission's prior detailed findings and conclusions in this matter, and reiterate that the Berrys have fully complied with and satisfied all of the legal and equitable requirements which were a prerequisite to the granting of the subject variance and the minute order determination of the lot grade calculation for the property. In support of the Berrys' position, we respectfully direct the City Council to the City's findings and conclusions set forth in (a) the Planning Commission's report dated June 11, 1997, (b) Planning Commission Resolution 97- 45, and (c) the Planning Commission's report dated July 14, 1997. 4. While the Appellants have attempted to cleverly craft their arguments underthe guise of objections to side yard measurements and base elevation calculations, it is clear that the Appellants' sole purpose in appealing the granting of the variances is to seek to preserve any westward views that they may have. Indeed, one of the Appellants has gone so far as to declare that the "remodel would substantially impair the views of each property owner east of Myrtle, and effectively change one of the lowest silhouettes in their view corridor to one of the highest." Apparently, the Appellants feel that they are legally entitled to preserve their views at the expense of, and to the detriment of, their neighbors. Notwithstanding the fact that there is no legal entitlement to the preservation of the "view corridor" which the Appellants seek, the Appellants are attempting to inappropriately use this appeal process to further their impermissible and illegal goals. (As an aside, we would like to inquire of the Appellants as to whether they were so passionately concerned with preserving "view corridors" when they were in the process of constructing and/or remodelling their respective homes and applying for [and LAW OFFICES fRffmflfl, fRffmfl(1 & SMILEY, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS City Council of Hermosa Beach July 22, 1997 Page 3 ultimately receiving] some of the same variances which the Berrys are seeking) . 5. With respect to the grade of the Berrys' lot, the Planning Commission has rightfully concluded that, because the property is on an abrupt slope, and because of significant erosion which has occurred over the years, it was and is appropriate to use the elevation of the nearest public improvement (the sidewalk of Myrtle Avenue) as the base for interpolating the height of the lot. The Planning Commission's conclusion is consistent with the current definition for grade which in part states that "[i]n cases where there is significant variation in elevations between adjacent properties at corner points, the point of measurement shall be based on the nearest public improvement, or an alternative point within three horizontal feet, which, based on supporting evidence, represents existing unaltered grade." 6. The Appellants have fixated on the prior lotgrade determinations employed for other neighborhood properties, but have refused to recognize that the relevant statute on the issue of determining the grade of lots was revised in 1996 andclearly provides that the "nearest public improvement" is the appropriate reference point for determining grade in this instance. Despite the Appellants' refusal to recognize the appropriateness of the "nearest public improvement" approach, the Berrys and the Planning Commission maintain that the street elevation of Myrtle Avenue is "the only point which can safely be assumed to represent unaltered grade. . ." (See page 3 of the Planning Commission's report dated July 14, 1997). 7. The record in this matter clearly shows that the Planning Commission acted well within its jurisdiction and discretion to grant the requested variance and to enter the minute order regarding the calculation of the grade of the Berrys' lot. Moreover, there is ample evidence in front of the City Council to support and affirm these conclusions. Notwithstanding the record in this matter, the Appellants have stated that the actions of the Planning Commission thus far "will set a dangerous precedent". However, the Berrys submit that it would set a dangerous precedent for the City Council to bow to the pressure of dissatisfied homeowners who are impermissibly and wrongfully seeking to preserve views that they may currently enjoy. If the City Council were to comply with the Appellants' requests, it would send a message to the community that views and/or view corridors will be protected by LAW OFFICES fREEmf111, fRffmflfl & SMILEY, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS City Council of Hermosa Beach July 22, 1997 Page 4 the City, notwithstanding the fact that there is no legal entitlement or right to the protection of such views. Based on the foregoing, on the other materials and arguments previously submitted by the Berrys and on such further materials and arguments which maybe submitted at the hearing on this matter, it is respectfully requested that the City Council (a) sustain the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the variance from the south side yard requirement to allow a 2.2 foot side yard to remain, and (b) reaffirm the Planning Commission's decision to use the nearest public improvement as the base elevation for building height (measured from the sidewalk of Myrtle Avenue). Respectfull submitted, Ai /24 Paul J. Goldman, for FREEMAN, FREEMAN & SMILEY, LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Law Corporations mhj:1253.55.1 cc: Jim and Jane Berry Bruce L. Gelb, Esq. LAW OFFICES fRffmfln, fkEEmfln & SMILEY, LLP A. LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE ONE MARKET STEUART TOWER. 16TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105 TELEPHONE (415) 974-1930 . REFER TO FILE NO. 12480.800 LOS ANGELES OFFICE PENTHOUSE, SUITE 1200 3415 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90034-6060 TELEPHONE (310) 398-6227 FACSIMILE (310) 391-4042 July 22, 1997 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE 2010 MAIN STREET, SUITE 580 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 TELEPHONE (714) 833-7966 FACSIMILE. (714) 833-9584 PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: Los Angeles WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL: Re: Appeal of Variance and Building Height. Determination Relating to Real Property Owned by Jim and Jane Berry Located at 2429 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California Ladies and Gentlemen: This office has been retained by Jim and Jane Berry in connection with the above -referenced matter. We have received and reviewed the various filings submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach. in this matter by or on behalf of appellants Daniel F. Valenzuela, Kathy and John Dunbabin and Bo Webber (collectively, the "Appellants"), and we have the following comments and responses: 1. The Appellants have submitted voluminous unsubstantiated and hearsay allegations to the City Council in an attempt to shift the City Council's focus away from the elements and criteria that are appropriate for review in this appeal context. Many of the Appellants'. allegations are patently false. However, rather than waste the City_ Council's time with a specific written rebuttal to eachspecific falsehood set forth in the Appellants' papers (except with respect to the "filling" at the property which is addressed in item 2 below), the Berrys are prepared to address and respond to each of the Appellants' specific factual allegations at the City Council hearing on this matter, if requested to do so. 2. The_ Appellants would have the City Council believe that the Berrys have acted improperly or nefariously in obtaining the variance and other ruling which they received from the Planning LAW OFFICES fREEmfln, fQ€€mfln & SMILEY, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS City Council of Hermosa Beach. July 22, 1997 Page 2 Commission. For example, the Appellants have characterized the dirt filling which the Berrys performed at the property as illegal. However, the filling which has occurred was at all times permissible and legal, and was performed during hours when the Berrys' actions were plainly visible to the public (including various neighbors in the vicinity of the subject property). Finally, the fill was performed for the benefit of, among other parties, the City of Hermosa Beach and neighboring residents, inasmuch as the fill helped slow erosion of the slope of the property and the deterioration of the adjacent sidewalk areas. 3. Notwithstanding the Appellants' attempt to mislead the City Council, we respectfully request that the City Council remain focussed on the specific statutory requirements that are appropriate for review in this matter. In this regard, we agree with the Planning Commission's prior detailed findings and conclusions in this matter, and reiterate that the Berrys have fully complied with and satisfied all of the legal and equitable requirements which werea prerequisite to the granting of the subject variance and the minute order determination of the lot grade calculation for the property. In support of the Berrys' position, we respectfully direct the City Council to the City's findings and conclusions set forth in (a) the Planning Commission's report dated June 11, 1997, (b) Planning Commission Resolution 97- 45, and (c) the Planning Commission's report dated July 14, 1997., 4. While the Appellants have attempted to cleverly craft their arguments under the guise of objections to side yard measurements and base elevation calculations, it is clear that the Appellants' sole purpose in appealing the granting of the variances is to seek to preserve any westward views that they may have. Indeed, one of the Appellants has gone so far as to declare that the "remodel would substantially impair the views of each property owner east of Myrtle, and effectively change oneof the lowest silhouettes in their view corridor to one of the highest." Apparently, the Appellants feel that they are legally entitled to preserve their views at the expense of, and to the detriment of, their neighbors. Notwithstanding the fact that there is no legal entitlement to the preservation of the "view corridor" which the Appellants seek, the Appellants are attempting to inappropriately use this appeal process to further their impermissible and illegal goals. (As an aside, we would like to inquire of the Appellants as to whether they were so passionately concerned with preserving "view corridors" when they were in the process of constructing and/or remodelling their respective homes and applying for [and LAW OFFICES fRf€mfln, fQ€fmfln & SMILEY, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS City Council of Hermosa Beach July 22, 1997 Page 3 ultimately receiving] some of the same variances which the Berrys are seeking). 5. With respect to the grade of the Berrys' lot, the Planning Commission has rightfully concluded that, because the property is on an abrupt slope, and because of significant erosion which has occurred over the years, it was and is appropriate to use the elevation of the nearest public improvement (the sidewalk of Myrtle Avenue) as the base for interpolating the height of the lot. The Planning Commission's conclusion is consistent with the current definition for grade which in part states that "[i]n cases where there is significant variation in elevations between adjacent properties at corner points, the point of measurement shall be based on the nearest public improvement, or an alternative point within three horizontal feet, which, based on supporting evidence, represents existing unaltered grade." 6. The Appellants have fixated on the prior lot grade determinations employed for other neighborhood properties, but have refused to recognize that the relevant statute on the issue of determining the grade of lots was revised in 1996 and clearly provides that the "nearest public improvement" is the appropriate reference point for determining grade in this instance. Despite the Appellants' refusal to recognize the appropriateness of the "nearest public improvement" approach, the Berrys and the Planning Commission maintain that the street elevation of Myrtle Avenue is "the only point which can safely be assumed to represent unaltered grade. . ." (See page 3 of the Planning Commission's report dated July 14, 1997). 7. The record in this matter clearly shows that the Planning Commission acted well within its jurisdiction and discretion to grant the requested variance and to enter the minute order regarding the calculation of the grade of the Berrys' lot. Moreover, there is ample evidence in front of the City Council to support and affirm these conclusions. Notwithstanding the record in this matter, the Appellants have stated that the actions of the Planning Commission thus far "will set a dangerous precedent". However, the Berrys submit that it would set a dangerous precedent for the City Council to bow to the pressure of dissatisfied homeowners who are impermissibly and wrongfully seeking to preserve views that they may currently enjoy. If the City Council were to comply with the Appellants' requests, it would send a message to the community that views and/or view corridors will be protected by LAW OFFICES fRffmflfl, -FRffmflll & SMILEY, LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING LAW CORPORATIONS City Council of Hermosa Beach July 22, 1997 Page 4 the City, notwithstanding the fact that there is no legal entitlement or right to the protection of such views. Based on the foregoing, on the other materials and arguments previously submitted by the Berrys and on such further materials and arguments which may be submitted at the hearing on this matter, it is respectfully requested that the City Council (a) sustain the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the variance from the south side yard requirement to allow a 2.2 foot side yard to remain, and (b) reaffirm the Planning Commission's decision to use the nearest public improvement as the base elevationfor building height (measured from the sidewalk of Myrtle Avenue). Respectfully submitted, Paul J. Goldman, for FREEMAN, FREEMAN & SMILEY, LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Law Corporations mhj :125155:1 cc: Jim and Jane Berry Bruce L. Gelb, Esq. Jim and Jane Berry 2429 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RECEIVED Phone: (310) 798 9919 Fax: (310) 798 9939 July 16, 1997 Jut t 71997 FANNING DEPT. re: Determination of Grade Elevation for Remodel and Addition at 2429 Myrtle Ave. Dear City Council Member: At the planning commission hearing June 17th we received a variance to maintain an existing side wall and garage, and were told that we could build a six foot high concrete stairway in our north sideyard. Due to complaints from neighbors whose views may be affected, the planning commission was also asked to rule by minute order on how our lot grade should be determined. Because of substantial erosion of our property, the city deemed it inappropriate to establish our east corner points by existing elevations. Plans submitted to the city have determined height using corner points calculated using the nearest public improvement, the near edge of the sidewalk. The planning commission reviewed and listened to the various methods of determining height demanded by the people whose views may be affected. Guided by grade regulations and previous precedents, the commissioners voted unanimously to use the nearest public improvement. Using this method, the highest point of our new home will be about 20 feet above Myrtle Avenue. Erosion has occurred over the years because our house is built on the west (Ozone Ct.) side of our lot about 60 feet from the Myrtle Avenue property line, with no structure to retain the fill used to create Myrtle Ave. With the exception of our lot and our neighbor's to the south, houses on the west (downhill) side of Myrtle have retained the fill with driveway structures or house foundations built adjacent to Myrtle. The fill used to create the property line grades of the east (uphill) side of Myrtle (where the complaining people live) has been retained by the street itself. Three years ago, we cleared plants and removed soil which further increased erosion. We noticed that the footing for our block wall was exposed and the sidewalk had collapsed due to the erosion. Nine months ago, we added soil to our property to help repair and stabilize the erosion. We have never used either the eroded or altered grades to determine our property height. The attached sheets describe how our east property line grades are determined. Sincerel tuart Berry The following explains how our east corner point grades are determined: Figure 1 shows cross sections through the east property line of our land. Four different methods of determining corner point elevation at the property line are shown. Figure 2 shows the height of corner points above the curb on the west side of Myrtle Avenue. 1. The first method, which establishes the corner points 0.3 ft. above the curb, is based on a two percent grade up from the curb to the property line. According to the Hermosa Beach Public Works department, this is the grade that the city would use if were to build or repair the sidewalk in front of our house today. This method is also the same elevation as the corner points of our neighbor's property to the north. 2. The next method is the survey of the current grade of the corner points. These are 0.3 ft. (north) and 0.6 ft. (south) below the curb. 3. The third method uses a line drawn from the nearest public improvement, the sidewalk, down to our west property line on Ozone to determine the grade. The planning commission unanimously approved this method during our hearing on June 17. In the case of the south east corner point, the sidewalk elevation is increased to it's original 2% grade to account for it's erosion. This method puts the corner points 1.0 ft. and 1.1 ft. below the curb. The most recently built home on the south side of Myrtle is 4 houses to the north at 2459 Myrtle. It is a very similar property. When it was built in 1991 it's east property line was not eroded, so a survey of the existing grade was used. These corner points are 1.1 ft. and 1.3 ft. below the curb. About the same as our proposed method. 4. After the planning commission decision to use the sidewalk, the city•suggested that we use the Myrtle Avenue flow line as the nearest public improvement, even though it is 7 ft. farther away from our property line than the edge of the sidewalk. This method would establish our corner points about a foot lower below the curb than 2459 Myrtle. Using method 3, the near edge of the sidewalk, to determine our corner point grade, the highest point on our proposed house will be about 20 feet above the curb. This corresponds well with the house at 2459 Myrtle Ave which goes up to about 21 feet above the curb. Both houses are well below the 25 ft. maximum height limit since the lots slope down to the west. Suggestions that our house should be pushed down lower than this are unreasonable and without precedent. The planning commission unanimously decided that the height of our house should be determined using the nearest public improvement, the sidewalk. This is the appropriate method considering the erosion of our lot and the intent of the height regulations. Using the near edge of the sidewalk will lead to a consistent, aesthetic line of buildings on the west side of Myrtle. Page 2 , 1 ? (12e9‘V6C 410791- POI;,4,_,1 , ‘.0rnir" • P•01#1. • ,Cr7ei-..1.-P0.1141.1"-• (2)12 al0 6itqcle__ ferci„; ,v ri lg. 0..1 *t ,.. citove, 0.3.4-1,-,..0,40v:e._, It .hdow. , :act'? ' /k 1.erpo lopf?,-i,,.--7 /.O p' .1-)eicitv • 1- l .'1 ; 4loi-J notv 44 27-11)*Aii)e'l 24-t- le/01-1/ ' i 2-. .'.14...hq.oifi( • 2 ii 5-5 ny.vrvey- : -i • L'rtle: 1 (l; h 1 11) ' —.• -'. c ° ' 1'3 "6-." 1 : • 1 I , l'i; • 1 • i... -i----•• - ' ' !. 2_ ei 5. i /ifyille S././e1,14$*.Aik, /-'0 bel(oxi 0 p' ,8e4114 _ fl,l/tC.,2 Pro p-Pf / 6o r n;tor-ir P L4 --/e 1,4 '41, kls 0 (2c/z47 nc'?/,-c/ 7p-of-O-fb (74 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS RECEIVED JUL 1 71997 CITY MGR OFFICE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA RE: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION VARIANCE FOR 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE INTRODUCTION The owner and occupants of 2429 Myrtle Avenue, James and Jane Berry, are proposing an addition to their current non -conforming structure. The proposed addition has approximately 135% of floor space when compared to the existing non -conforming structure. City ordinance states that additions to non -conforming structures are limited to 50%. However, with Planning Commission approval, a 100% addition is allowable. In either instance, a variance is not necessary. However, given that the Berry proposal is 135% of the existing non -conforming structure, a variance is required. The Berry structure is non -conforming to side yard requirements on both sides of the lot. The side yard requirements are 10% of lot width or three feet. The north side of the Berry house includes a garage storage level area and entry landing above, rear bedroom, which are located on the north property line with no set back. The current remodel plan calls for a partial correction of this set back problem with a modification of the bedroom, but to maintain the storage and stair landing which encroaches into the side yard with no set back. The south building wall is continuous along the whole south side of the building and leaves a side yard of 2.2 feet rather than 3 feet, which the remodel proposes to maintain. (Please see Exhibit 1, page 2, Staff Report to Planning Commission.) The request for variances was considered at the Planning Commission Regular Meeting of June 17, 1997. The Commission voted 3 to 2 to allow the variance on the south yard. The variance on the north yard was not addressed because Chairman Tucker indicated that if the landing on the stairway on the northside was reduced to 6 feet from the proposed 8 feet, that a variance would not be needed (Exhibit 2, Videotape of Planning Commission Hearing at the following parts of the tape: 7 min. 27 sec.; 8 min. 7 sec.; 10 min. 12 sec.; 41 min. 21 sec.; 43 min. 29 sec. The times listed refer to the lapsed time of the tape and all times are approximate). The Berrys agreed to this change and therefore no vote was taken on the requested variance on the north side. Petitioners note that Commissioner Tucker's interpretation of the City code with regard to height of landing is incorrect. City code clearly indicates that the height of the stair landing can be no higher than 4 feet from the natural, existing or finished grade, which ever is of the lesser height. Section 17.46.110 (Exhibit 3). The 4 foot height limitation was clearly set forth in the Staff's report to the Planning Commission (Exhibit 1, page 2, last sentence of paragraph 5). Therefore, it appears that a variance is still necessary. However, the Planning Commission did not address a variance for the north side of the Berry property. Therefore, Petitioners in this document will address only the Planning Commissions decision to allow variance on the south side of the Berry property. Petitioners submit that the granting of the variance was improper and that the Planning Commission acted arbitrarily, capricious and in excess of its jurisdiction. The Council therefore must deny the variance requested. STATEMENT OF CASE City code requires that the Planning Commission make certain findings to grant a variance. Section 17.54.020. These requirements include the following: 1. - There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical -2- 1 2 3 •4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 conditions applicable to the property involved. 2. A variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. 4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. Section 17.54.020 (Exhibit 4). Staff reported that the applicant's request for the variance was based on the premise that to maintain the integrity of the existing structure, a fireplace could not be moved (Exhibit 1, page 2, first sentence, paragraph 5). At the Planning Commission hearing, the basis for the variance (that the fireplace could not be moved) was not initially discussed. The majority of the Commissioners who voted for the variance did so because similar exceptions had been granted in the past (Exhibit 2: 40 min. 50 sec; 41 min. 21 sec.; 42 min. 10 sec.; 42 min. 25 sec.; 43 min. 42 sec.; 45 min. 5 sec.). This is simply irrelevant to the four factors listed above. The sole issue which should have been addressed by the Planning Commission is whether the four factors are established to grant a variance. Furthermore, it is apparent that the majority of the Commissioners led by Chairman Tucker were unaware or simply unwilling to apply the four requirements for the granting of variance. Initially, Chairman Tucker was unaware that the Berry's "extraordinary or exceptional circumstances "was based on the allegation that the fireplace could not be moved (e.g., Exhibit 2, 41 min. 1 sec.; 45 min. 40 sec.; 45 min. 50 sec.). Eventually, this fact is pointed out to Chairman Tucker by one of the Commissioners who voted in the minority (Exhibit 2, 45 min. 55 sec.). Commissioner Tucker then asked the Berrys about this. Mr. Berry replied from the audience that -3- moving the fireplace was cost prohibitive. Chairman Tucker seemed not to agree with this statement by Mr. Berry. Rather, he indicated that the fireplace could readily be removed and that a metal fireplace could be put in as a substitute on the second floor (Exhibit 2, 46 min. 25 sec. through 47 min. 15 sec.). This comment by Chairman Tucker in of itself indicates that there are no exceptional and extraordinary circum- stances that would result in the granting of a variance. Obviously, if the fireplace can be readily removed, an `exceptional and extraordinary circumstance "is not present. ARGUMENT The facts of this case, in addition to appropriate law, reveal that granting of the variance was not appropriate. The burden of proof to support a variance is on the person applying for the variance. Orinda Assoc. v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 182 Cal. App. 3d 1145, 1167, 227 Cal. Rptr. 688; PMI Mortgage Ins. Co. v. City Pacific Grove (1981) 128 Cal. App. 3d 724, 731, 179 Cal. Rptr. 185. The burden in this case cannot be sustained. In order for the burden to be reached, all four of the above -referenced requirements must be established. In this particular case, none of the requirements are present to allow the variance. The firstrequirement is that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions of the applicable property. The Berry's attempt to meet this requirement by indicating that they do not want to move a fireplace because it would be cost prohibitive. /1/ 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioners respond that the moving of a fireplace under no circumstance is exceptional or extraordinary. As Chairman Tucker indicated in his comments at the Planning Commission hearing, the removal and replacement of the fireplace is routine. Also, given that this exception is limited to physical conditions applicable to the property involved, removing of a fireplace simply cannot meet this definition. Furthermore, economic hardship in of itself is an insufficient foundation for a variance. Variances are not meant to ensure against financial disappointment. Broadway, Laguna Etc., Assoc. v. Board of Permanent Appeals, (1967) 66 Cal. 2d 767, 774-775. The California Supreme Court has stated that data suggesting that development of property in conformance with general zoning classifications that could require substantial expenditures are not relevant to the issue as to whether a variance should be granted. Topanga Assoc. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles, (1994) 11 Cal. 3d 506, 522. Accordingly, the Berry project cannot meet the initial requirement for a variance and therefore it must be denied given that all four requirements must be met. In addition, a review of the facts reveal that the other requirements cannot be met. The second requirement is that a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. The Berrys desire a variance in order to construct a 135% addition when it compared to the current non -confirming structure. Although other encroachment discretionary exceptions may have been given in the past in the same zone and vicinity, there is no evidence to support that an encroachment exception has been given to provide for an addition which is in excess of what is allowed by city code. Essentially, the Berrys need a variance in order to build beyond 100% as allowed by city code with Planning Commission approval and without a variance. The -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 encroachment exceptions in the immediate area that have been allowed in the past, did not involve projects which then exceeded the 100% limit. Accordingly, the type of variance requested by the Berrys have not been granted to other properties in the same vicinity in the past; i.e., no other properties in the same vicinity and zone have received this type of variance in order to enjoy a substantial property right. Furthermore, the Berrys can build up to 100% of their existing non -conforming structure without a variance. This results in a structure with 2,956 square feet of floor space. This will more than allow the Berry's enjoyment of a substantial property right which others in the area in the past have possessed. There is no basis to suggest that in order to enjoy a substantial property right, the Berrys must add on to the extent of 135% of the current non -conforming structure. The third requirement dictates that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The granting of a variance in this case will have an adverse affect on the neighbors and, more particularly, on the public welfare because it will set a dangerous precedent. Current city code limits additions to 100% of non -conforming structures. This decision has been made by the City of Hermosa Beach and puts all purchasers of property and all others in the surrounding area on notice as to what may be done in their neighborhoods in the future. However, to allow a variance in this case would clearly render the city code irrelevant and uneffective. This is clearly detrimental to the public at large. Also, those individuals who rely on City Code will be adversely affected. The final requirement is that the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. The proposed Berry addition will be inconsistent, conflict and be detrimental to the general plan. A few years ago the general plan in the City of Hermosa was amended. The result of the amendment was to down zone many of the neighborhoods. The resulting -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 down zoning often resulted in larger set backs being required, lower height and less,density on lots. In particular, the area where the Berry property is located was rezoned from R2 to R1. Essentially, the general plan was amended and the Berry lot, in particular, to reduce the density of the buildings and structures that could be built in the future. Density is controlled by zoning regulations of height, set backs and open space. The Berry addition proposes a 135% increase in valuation which results in a proposed floor area of 3,396 square feet when compared with the existing floor area of 1,478 square feet (Exhibit 1, page 1). This increase in density, particularly when code limits non -conforming additions to 100% increase in valuation, conflicts with and is detrimental to the general plan. The Berrys in a letter to the City allege that the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. The Berrys state that there will be no affect on the general plan and that the conversion will result in an attractive single family home that will reduce density while improving housing quality, safety and aesthetics (Exhibit 5, pages 4 and 6). Adding 135% of square feet will not reduce density. Also, whether such a large addition will improve aesthetics is a matter of subjective determination. Further, it is simply irrelevant. The desirability of a property is not a special circumstance which will result in a granting of a variance. See, Hamilton v. Board of Supervisors, (1969) 269 Cal. App. 2d 64, 68-70; Orinda, supra, 182 Cal. App. 3d at 166-167. The Berry's also allege that a variance is appropriate because they will be going beyond what is required in order to increase the safety of their non -conforming structure and the proposed structure. This is made in particular reference with fire safety and public welfare (Exhibit 5, page 4, paragraph 2, and page 5, last paragraph). -7- However, the fact that a developer plans to build according to standards that are stricter than required does not establish a special circumstance to grant a variance. Broadway, Laguna, supra, 66 Cal. App. 2d at 776-777. The Berrys had actual or at least constructive notice of the zoning regulations in the City of Hermosa Beach at all times. The fact that they purchased a piece of property that requires a variance in order to proceed with their proposed project is simply unfortunate. However, hardships that are self-induced cannot legally justify the granting of a variance. Broadway, Laguna, 66 Cal. App. 2d at 778. CONCLUSION City code clearly sets forth the requirements for the granting of a variance. These requirements are not optional but are mandatory. The Planning Commission simply did not address the requirements when it voted 3 to 2 to allow the variance on the south property line. Accordingly, the Planning Commission acted arbitrarily, capriciously and in excess of its jurisdiction. Finally, the facts of the case clearly demonstrate that the four requirements are not met. As such, it is respectfully requested that the City Council vacate the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the requested variance. DANIEL F. VALENZUELA Dated: 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (1013a, 2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled action; my business address is: 350 West Fifth Street, Suite 105, San Pedro, California, 90731. On July 17 , 1997, I served the within APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION VARIANCE FOR 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE on the interested parties in said action, by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Pedro, California addressed as follows: SEE LIST ATTACHED. I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 17, 1997 at San Pedro, California. Daniel F. Valenzuela Type or Print Name 13e - USpiv/0 Signature C Elaine C. Doerfling, City Clerk (HAND -DELIVERED) City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Mayor J.R. Raviczky (HAND -DELIVERED) c/o City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Office Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Mayor Pro Tern Sam Y. Edgerton (HAND -DELIVERED) c/o City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Office Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Council Member Robert Benz (HAND -DELIVERED) c/o City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Office Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Council Member John Bower (HAND -DELIVERED) do City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Office Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Council Member Julie Oakes (HAND -DELIVERED) do City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Office Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Mr. James Berry (U.S. MAIL) 2429 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 EXHIBIT 1 09-1 o Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: VARIANCE 97-3 LOCATION: 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE APPLICANT: JIM BERRY 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA June 11, 1997 Regular Meeting of June 17, 1997 REQUESTS: VARIANCES TO ALLOW EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARDS OF 0' AND 2.2' RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 3 FEET TO BE MAINTAINED FOR A GREATER THAN 100% REMODEL AND EXPANSION. OF AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CONSIDERATION OF BUILDING HEIGHT Recommendations 1. To approve the requested variance to maintain the 2.2 foot south side yard, but to deny maintaining the 0 -foot north side yard. 2. To direct staff as deemed appropriate by minute order relative to establishing the base for measuring building height. 3. Confirm by minute order that the proposed garage extension is functionally part of the existing building. Background ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: LOT SIZE: EXISTING USE: EXISTING FLOOR AREA: PROPOSED FLOOR AREA: PERCENT INCREASE IN VALUATION: R-1 Low Density Residential 2,993 square feet Single-family dwelling' 1,478 square feet 3,396 Square Feet 135% The subject lot is located on the west side of Myrtle Avenue with access from the west on Ozone Court. The lot slopes fairly steeply to towards the ocean from Myrtle Avenue to Ozone Court, with an elevation change of about 15 feet, with most of this change on an abrupt slope just west of Myrtle Avenue. The lot is currently developed with a one-story (two levels) single-family dwelling located on the low, westerly portion of the lot. The dwelling has no record of duplex use'. The existing dwelling 1 1.2 was constructed in 1922 and is currently nonconforming to side yard requirements on both sides of the lot. The applicant is proposing a substantial remodel and expansion project, involving the removal of the rear walls and rear (easterly) portions of the existing house and the construction of three new levels east of the existing dwelling. The project incorporates a new entry and orientation on Myrtle Avenue, and maximizes height up the slope to take advantage of ocean views. Analysis Existing side yards are nonconforming to the current requirement of 10% of lot width, or 3 feet. The north side of the house includes a garage level storage area and entry landing above, and rear bedroom which are located on the north property line. The remodel plans call for correcting the yard problem at the bedroom, but to maintain the storage and landing area at the property line. The south building wall is continuous along the whole south side of the building, leaving a side yard of 2.2 feet rather than 3 feet, which is proposed to be maintained. In order to grant a variance, the Commission must make the following findings: • There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved. • The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right .possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question • The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located • The variance is consistent with the General Plan The applicant's request is based on the premise that to maintain the integrity of the existing structure\ the fireplace cannot be moved. Therefore, the parking spaces must fall on each side of the fireplace, making the correcting of nonconforming yards a structural problem. While this may be true for the south yard, it is not the case for the north side since a storage area, stairway and landing structure could be removed to comply with the 3 -foot yard. This applicant argues that this serves as his only e egress onto Ozone Court. The applicant has also indicated he is willing to eliminate the storage and i convert it to a stairway and landing only (i.e. an 8 -foot high concrete landing with stairs on both sides which would make it a variance from the maximum height for a stairway landing in the side yard (4 feet) rather than a yard variance. i Given the scale of the expansion/remodel project staff previously recommended that the applicant consider demo lishing_the existing house to build a new one, in complete compliance with zoning requirements. Thea licant, however, has proceeded with the plans as submitted in ordo maintain tbef r ace and entry land`i ng. While findings for a Variance are possible for e south side y situ i e exi t g physical constraints of the fireplace, staff does not believe y dings can possibly to justify a Variance for oirth side yard or extra high landing in the soul side yard. Fu era new main entry will be available from the Myrtle Avenue side of the lot and interior access is provided from the garage level to the main floor via an interior stairway. The project also proposes to modify the nonconforming existing two -car garage (with a current sub- standard depth of about 17.5 feet)•to extend outward 1 foot to be flush with the base of the masonry k�J 2 chimney structure. This is necessary to comply with the exception allowed for existing 18 -foot depth garages, pursuant to Section 17.44.140 of the Zoning Ordinance, to qualify for an exception to the 20 - foot depth and guest-lfa g=Fequirement_Sincethe existing garage depths do not actually comply with that exception, the proposal needs a supportive interpretation by the Commission, that this 1 -foot extension is functionally part of the existing building. • HEIGHT MEASUREMENT -� In its original evaluation of this property for the basis of the height measurement along Myrtle Avenue the Building Division recognized that elevations at the east corner points, which are eight feet west of j the Myrtle Avenue sidewalk, are on an abrupt slop, and also ave een mo e y added fill dirt �-J- making it difficult to obtain accurate base elevations at these corner points. Given this circumstance, and the -disrepair of the sidewalk, the elevation at the nearest public improvement was used (the flow line of the west gutter of Myrtle Avenue) as the base for ' terpolating-height from the upper side of the lot. This approach was consistent with past practices for sloping ots, and consistent with the current definition for grade, which in part states 'In cases where there significant variation in elevations between adjacent properties at corner points the point of measurement shall be based do the nearest publi unprovement or analte� rnari've pont within 3 horizontaleetf , w cEbbased-on suppo?fr ing evidence,scpresents existtered grade' S.:. - .' - •• • - • nl nearby point which can safely be assumed represents unaltered gra, - since the street was constructed,•js the street elevation itself The applicant's proposal reflects an approach to interpolatfrom the Myrtle Avenue estimated original sidewalk grade. The reason the applicantis requesting this approach is to be consistent with a height calculation_that was done for 2459 Myrtle Avenufi. Also, the grade of the sidewalk is estimated since erosion underneath the sidew s causedit to subside. . Staff's method of calculation results in only a slight difference from the applicant's method, resulting in a maximum height of about 8 inches less at the top of the roof deck railing (119.01 rather than 119.75). Otherwise, the rest of the building, as proposed, would fall within the maximum height per staff's approach. Also, in reviewing recent and past building construction along Myrtle, the resulting two \. story scale and a.. r ate 21 -foot height from the street level would be consistent with the scale of hct.,( of two other • • o story omes on th_e_westside of the street. (The most recent project on the west side of the street, '459 M e, is also a two-story/three level project with a finished building height at approximatel 21 fe:. • om the street level. _It appears building height for that project was interpolated from the east • er points aUhe 1ioice of the archite-i However, in that case if the street level would have been used it would have made little difference) A possible option would be to require the applicant to hire a soils engineer to use soil borings to establish the depth of the recent fill at the east corner points. With that information it would be possible to determine the base corner point elevations that existed before the recent fill, and either base the height measurement on that point, or pursuant to the grade definition where supporting evidence is lacking at "1/2 the difference be een the ad'acent elevation and the elevation on the p • • erty in ue " Either of these options, however, .: • e that the gra a eves • - • - - - - - . filling (8- • feet from the street) are good representatio of unaltered grade d ignore - possib' ' that erosion, excavation or cutting may have occurred since ' ere constructed. 3 Because of the dispute about height determination in this case, including correspondence from neighboring property owners that the pre-existing corner point elevations should be used, the height calculation is being referred to the Planning Commission. Summary of Options for Determining Grade for Height Measurement: 1. Refer to elevation of nearest public improvement. — - 2. Refer to elevation point within three horizontal feet of the corner point which based on evidence represents unaltered grades ViAtj — 3. Utilize an elevation which is 1/2 the difference between the adjacent elevation and elevation in question at the corner point in the absence of supporting documentation. 4. Determine previous unaltered elevation for comer points based upon geotechnical study of unfilled and filled portions of property. 5. Use geotechnical study for southeasterly corner point where ground level may be historically lower than other locations along the block and use the existing corner point at northeasterly comer which is consistent with properties along the block. Ken Robertson CONCUR: Associate Planner Michael Schub City Planner Sol B umenfel �, D. ector Community D velopment Department 'The applicant has noted that the property maintains an existing right for a duplex. According to building permit records, and the Residential Building Report when the Berry's purchased the property, there is only 1 unit Further, if there was any nonconforming duplex use in the past, it has long lost legal nonconforming status since the use has not been maintained, and no second kitchen exists. Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Correspondence: Applicant, and Neighbors KR/sr2429 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 \Y.-22 t?I'N'c 23 `tb�,25 P.C. RESOLUTION 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SOUTH SIDE YARD REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW A 2.2 SIDE SETBACK TO REMAIN, AND TO DENY A REQUEST TO MAINTAIN NO SIDE YARD ON THE NORTH SIDE AT 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 17, 1997, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for the subject Variances and made the following findings for the requested south side yard variance: A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances because the existing structure making it unusually difficult to modify the side yard while complying with parking width requirements; B. The variance to extend into the side yard is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone; C. The granting of the variance from the side yard setback will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located; �° �I�J"�- C he` lL e F�` k' D. The variance is consistent with the General Plan. l� PrP t. V E. The granting of the variance is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment, pursuant to CaliforniatEnvironmental Quality Act 0C.1S Tit. (Air. PGuidelines, Sections 153055 s it involves a minor setback variance, with the finding that the project does not result in any changes in land use or density. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings for the requested north side yard variance; Lvi.C‘' N` Ste`` ��, C om- NN.�1 \ .A-1 T \ \\11- S' Lc -2 “-- �- � tJOQU �NJ�\vchW 9L)b st - of eA 69 c)..v cN.e 1 V J ire CC CCLP 3ZZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances because the structure can be easily modified to eliminate the storage area/stairway landing located in the side yard; B. The variance to extend into the side yard is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone; C. The granting of the variance from the side yard setback may potentially be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Variance to allow the south side yard of 2.2 feet to remain, and to deny the requested Variance for the north side yard, subject to the following conditions: SECTION'1 Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The project shall be consistent with submitted plans modified pursuant to the conditions noted below. Any further minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. a) Plans shall be revised to comply with the minimum required 3 -foot side yard requirement along the north side yard. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 97- is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of June 17, 1997. Peter Tucker, Chairman Sol Blumenfeld, Secretary Date h/rs2429 2 25 rH RADIUS MAP 2429 MYRTLE AVE. N DATE• 9 7 CASE NO• SCALE: J". /c o' EXHIBIT 2 VIDEOTAPE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (ATTACHED SEPARATELY) EXHIBIT 3 17.46.080 Fireplace encroachment into yards. Fireplace structures which are not wider than eight feet, are spaced a minimum of ten feet apart, and are part of the main building may project into the required yards a distance of thirty (30) inches, provided such encroachments are no closer than thirty (30) inches to the lot line. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1210) 17.46.090 Fire escape encroachment into yards. Fire escapes may encroach into yards thirty (30) inches provided that in no case such encroachment is closer than thirty (30) inches to the lot line. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1211) 17.46.100 Stairway and balcony encroachments into front yard areas. An open uncovered balcony may encroach into a required front yard thirty-six (36) inches, but in no case shall such encroachment be closer than three feet to the front property line and shall be a minimum of seven feet above finished grade. An unenclosed stairway or steps uncovered leading from grade to the first floor level only may encroach into a required front yard thirty-six (36) inches, but in no case shall such encroachment be closer than three feet to the front property line. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1212) 17.46.110 Uncovered, solid, concrete stair landings and stairs on grade may project into a side yard. Uncovered, solid concrete stair landing and stairs on grade which are not over four feet to the highest point from the natural, existing or finished grade, whichever is the lesser height, and do not extend above the level of the first floor of the building may extend or project into any required side yard not more than five feet. In order that such structure shall not obstruct any pedestrian way on the ground level, the stairs shall extend from the stair landings in both directions. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1213) 17.46.080 17.46.120 Guard railings may project into yards. Guard railing for safety protection around depressed ramps, open work fences, hedges or landscape architectural features not more than forty- two (42) inches in height may be located in any front or side yard, provided they do not obstruct any pedestrian way on ground level. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1214) 17.46.130 Walls, fences and hedges in residential, commercial and, manufacturing zones. A. A wall, fence or hedge thirty-six (36) inches in height may be located and maintained on any part of a lot. A fence, wall or hedge not more than six feet in height may be located anywhere on the lot to the rear of the rear line of the required front yard, provided that on the side street line of a corner lot a fence, wall or hedge higher than thirty-six (36) inches may extend only from the rear lot line to the rear line of the required side yard. In the case of a reversed corner lot, a fence, wall or hedge higher than thirty-six (36) inches shall not be located closer to the side street than a distance equal to the depth of the required front yard on the lot to the rear. B. Where a retaining wall protects a cut below the natural grade, and is located on the line separating lots, such retaining wall may be topped by a fence, wall or hedge of the same height that would otherwise be permitted at the location if no retaining wall existed. Where a retaining wall contains a fill, the height of the retaining wall built to retain the fill shall be considered as contributing to the permissible height of a fence, solid wall or hedge; provided, that in any event, a protective open work fence or wall not more than forty-two (42) inches in height may be erected at the top of the retaining wall. An "open work fence" means a fence in which the component solid portions are evenly distributed and constitute not more than sixty (60) percent of the total surface area of the fence. C. No fence or wall three feet or greater in height shall be constructed without first obtaining a building permit. (17.46) 3 EXHIBIT 4 VARIANCE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH A variance will only be granted by the Planning Commission when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The Planning Commission is required by law to make written findings to justify granting a variance. These findings include: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, limited to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved. 2. A variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. 4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. Please address all four required findings when submitting a variance application. 1. SUBMIT PROJECT TO rEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION The. following items must be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, before any application for a variance will be accepted. 1. Ten (10) full size sets of plans. The plans shall include the following: a. Lot Survey showing all existing improvements, including adjacent sidewalk, curb, street improvements, with property corner and adjacent property elevations. b. Site plan/parking plan shall clearly identify and dimension lot size, property corner elevations, building dimensions, setbacks, parking space dimension, turning radii. The site plans shall also show existing curb cuts and existing on -street parking, existing and finished elevations and adjacent elevations, and grading plans for projects -on sloping lots. 1 Sections: 17.54.010 17.54.020 17.54.030 17.54.040 17.54.050 17.54.060 17.54.070 17.54.080 HERMOSA BEACH ZONING ORDINANC; I Chapter 17.54 VARIANCES Authority to grant --Restrictions upon granting --Conditional use permits excluded. Findings—Conditions. Scope of administrative variances. Notices --Public comments or hearing. Report of decision and findings—Disposition of report. Appeals—Filing, fees procedure. Reapplication upon denial. Revocation-Causes—Hearing. 17.54.010 Authority to grant --Restrictions upon granting—Conditional use permits excluded. A. The planning commission shall grant variances; the building director shall serve as zoning administrator and shall grant administrative variances. Variances and administrative variances shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. B. A variance or administrative variance which authorizes a use or activity not otherwise expressly authorized by the zoning regulation governing the subject property shall not be granted. C. The provisions of this division shall not apply to conditional use permits. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1400) 17.54.020 Findings—Conditions. A. Who Shall Issue Findings. The planning commission shall issue findings on variances; the zoning administrator shall issue findings on administrative variances. _v. B. Required Findings. The following written findings are required for all variances and administrative variances: 1. Exceptional circumstances applicable to the property involved; 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity of the subject property; 3. That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; 4. That the granting of the variance will not conflict with the provisions of, or be detrimental to, the general plan. 168 EXHIBIT 5 Jim and Jane Berry 2429 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: (310) 798 9919 Fax: (310) 798 9939 May 19, 1997 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld Director, Community Development City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, RECEIVED HAY 211997 PLANNING DEPT. We are planning a substantial remodel of our home at 2427/2429 Myrtle Avenue. Our project will develop a single family home on this lot by upgrading the existing duplex and building an addition. Since our project retains two minor pre-existing non -conformities which require exceptions to the strict application of zoning ordinances, we are applying for a variance. We worked initially with your department to try and develop this project without the need for a variance. However, as our project adds more that 100% value to the property it cannot be completed under the special rules for "non -conforming remodels". As we are converting our property from a duplex to a single family home, our project should support the comprehensive General Plan and help in the implementation of "down - zoning" in our neighborhood. During our remodel the existing structure will be upgraded by improving plumbing, electrical system, insulation, HVAC, adding a new roof, and eliminating any hazardous materials. As required, we address each of the four variance finding areas for our two variance items as follows: ITEM # 1 Allow 32 ft of an existing exterior wall to remain, extending 0.8 ft into the side yard. For fire safety, all windows will be removed, except for two upstairs windows which will be inset to the required three foot setback. The closest structure is 9.5 ft from this existing wall (Photo A), and the owner of that property is supportive of this variance (Attachment 1). All other exterior walls will have fully compliant side yards. 1. Special Circumstances: We have investigated taking 0.8 ft off the existing structure. This would make the south garage too narrow and propagate many other changes. To be fully compliant we would have to demolish the existing house. We would then rebuild essentially the house we already have. This change would be cost prohibitive, and add very little benefit. Our existing building was constructed in about 1922. The building to the south, 227 24th Street, was built about the same time. Our neighbors' 9.5 ft wide driveway runs between the south wall of our home and the north -wall of their house. 2.2 ft of the driveway's width is on our property. Since the neighboring property's occupants have been using this portion of our property for more than 70 years, they may have a "by -use" easement right to it. If it was financially feasible to tear down our house and build a new structure, the preferred garage configuration would be a two car garage with a side yard parking spot on the south side of the new structure. This would reduce the width of the driveway for 227 24th to 7.3 feet, making it extremely difficult to enter and too narrow. This would also require a challenge of the neighbors easement rights. Due to these special conditions, we considered purchasing a 0.8 ft x 32 ft portion of 227 24th Street to provide a wider side yard. The community development department advised against this, since it would create a lot less than 30 ft wide. 2. Property rights possessed by other properties in the same area: Many other properties in our zone and neighborhood have side yards smaller than currently required. Some of these properties have recently received variances from the city to obtain building permits for additions that have created houses with similar livable square footage as we propose. A comparison of our proposed property and others in our neighborhood follows: 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 2 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE ( Our Proposed Home ) LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS 3000 sq.ft. 3396 sq.ft. 2432 MYRTLE AVENUE south side: 0.8 ft X 30 ft (proposed) LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS 2550 sq.ft. 2754 sq.ft. 318 24TH STREET date granted: 3/2/81 792 sq.ft. remodel permit: 4/28/88 south side: 0.3 ft X —55 ft north side: 0.4 ft X —55 ft front: 3.0 ft LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS 3267 sq.ft. 3188 sq.ft. 2418 HERMOSA AVENUE LOT AREA LIVABLE AREA 3000 sq.ft. 4455 sq.ft. dates granted: 7/21/80 & 12/22/88 Encroachment permit: 3/28/91 east side: 1.0 ft X —25ft front: 5.OftX-27ft ALLOWED ENCROACHMENTS date granted: 7/1/85 south side: 0.7 ft X —87 ft north side: 0.5 ft X —87 ft front: 0.2 ft X 25 ft rear: 0.73 ft X 25 ft Note that these variances granted much larger areas of non -conformity than ours. We are requesting that 15% of our side yard be non -conforming by 0.8 ft. The rest of our set backs will be conforming. 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 3 3. Variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare: The primary reason for the side yard set back is fire safety and access between adjacent structures. Since there is no structure within 9.5 ft of the wall, this is not currently an issue. Fire fighter access and occupant egress is also not an issue for the same reason. Assuming a future structure is built three feet from the property line, fire fighter access and occupant egress will still be very good, since a 5.2 ft wide space will be available between the structures. Fire ladder lean angles at 25 ft will still be shallower than for a 6 ft space for 30 or 35 foot high buildings. To maximize the future fire safety of this wall we will remove all windows from the lower floor, as well as all but two of the upper story windows. These two remaining windows will be set into the wall such that their external surface is three feet from the property line. Considering the lack of windows in the wall, the fire safety of our wall may exceed most new external walls. This variance only applies to 15% (32 feet out of a total of 216 feet) of the outside perimeter of the house. The remaining 85% is fully compliant. 4. Variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan: No adverse effect on the comprehensive General Plan has been identified. Overall, our conversion of a non -conforming duplex into an attractive single family home will be positive. It will reduce density while improving housing quality, safety, and aesthetics. ITEM #2: Allow an existing stairway in the north side yard to remain. The stairway will be upgraded to withstand fire for one hour and to provide full side yard access in both directions. 1. Special Circumstances: Our proposed project creates a single family home with a courtyard between the remodeled existing home and the new addition. A back door is required for safe egress from the first floor in the case of a fire in the courtyard, garage, or south side of the house. Additionally, a back door makes it more convenient to access the beach and Ozone Court from the house. In order to provide for a back door, without going through the garage, the existing stair must be retained. 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 4 These existing stairs have been used at this house since it was constructed in 1922, and will be upgraded as required to provide the same level of safety as fully -conforming new construction. 2. Property rights possessed by other properties in the same area: Many properties in our zone and neighborhood have access to the first floor using stairs over four feet in height located in the side yard. Many of these existing stairs are not fire resistant. Recent projects have also incorporated or upgraded such stairs as follows: 2460 MYRTLE AVENUE Granted a building permit for a substantial remodel on 4/1/93. Under this permit the stairs (Photo B) to this property were fire protected as we propose, but do not offer the side yard access modifications we are proposing. 2212 HERMOSA AVENUE Remodeled in 1995/1996, it's stairs are shown in Photo C. 2533 MYRTLE AVENUE This house, including the stairs shown in Photo D, was built under a permit granted 4/18/85. Other properties have been granted rights far beyond our request. For example: 2432 MYRTLE AVENUE Granted a variance on 3/2/81 to allow a stairway which projects into the front yard area. Currently, this stairway (photo E) also projects into the side yard and is constructed of wood. There is no record of these non-conformaties being corrected during a remodel performed under a permit granted 4/28/88. 3. Variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare: The height and construction of stairs in the side yard is limited by code to improve fire safety between adjacent structures, and to provide for easy side yard access for fire fighters and egressing occupants. We propose to fireproof the existing stairs and landing. We will also add a fireproof, concrete stairway to the east end of the existing landing leading down to the grade. This will allow pedestrian traffic through the side yard in both directions. These stairs additionally increase fire safety by providing an additional safe egress route for occupants of the house. The result of our modifications will protect the public welfare. We will create a stairway and side yard which is safer than it currently is, and also much safer than most in the area. 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 5 4. Variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan: No adverse effect on the comprehensive General Plan has been identified. Our project will reduce density while improving housing quality, safety, and aesthetics. In summary, we are requesting two minor variances. In both cases we have made provisions such that the end product will meet the intent of the building codes. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Attachments. James V. Be Jan Stuart Berry 2429 Myrtle Avenue Variance Request Page 6 /-d -a frct , 7L5( );,'M J1 "dry Zt7Z -F-- 2q 26-/ P7-1.41e-je. ti- /16 c 7— -4-- Lloyd Theodore 421 Sth Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 May 19, 1997 Sol Blumenfeld Director, Community Development City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, My neighbors Jim and Jane Berry plan to build an addition to their house at 2427/29 Myrtle Avenue in Hermosa Beach. I have reviewed the plans and understand that they intend to leave about 30 feet of the south wall of their existing house intact. The wall is 2.2 feet from the property line between their property and my property at 227 24th Street, and will not fully comply with the three foot side yard set back in this area. This is acceptable to me. Please feel free to provide copies of this letter to city officials reviewing the Berry's building permit. 01(4/ y Theodore c.c. Jim and Jane Berry f/f r-fle Ave Ugci.10 � ����t- - A/J*06 1 2�Z�i � Jim and Jane Berry 2429 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: (310) 798 9919 Fax: (310) 798 9939 May 21, 1997 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld Director, Community Development City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, RECEIVED NAY 2 1 1997 DI /MINING DEPT. We were notified by your division that a document had been submitted to the city by three of our neighbors' whose ocean views may be affected by the height of the addition to our house at 2427/29 Myrtle Avenue. We have reviewed a copy of the document provided to us by your staff. The following comments address statements made in this document. We would appreciate it if the city would consider our response and include it with any copies of our neighbors' document being reviewed. Our responses will refer to paragraphs and sentences in the document by page number and line. Page 2. Line 1: 300 foot radius written notice is not required for the 50% to 100% non- conforming remodel hearing which we were considering at the time. Page 2. Line 5: This is not true. While discussing our project with one of the petitioners, John Dunbabin (2432 Myrtle), in mid April, we notified him that we were canceling our hearing since we had determined that a 50% to 100% non -conforming remodel classification was not appropriate for our project. Page 2. Line 12: This limitation does not apply here. We are requesting a building permit for a project which will bring the old structure into conformity except for the two minor items in our variance application. Page 3. Line 11: The Segwick house at 2459 Myrtle is a very good example of the appropriate elevation of our property. 2459 Myrtle is the most recent development on the west side of Myrtle and lays on essentially the same topology. Page 5. Line 6: The picture is not of the property line. The center of the window in the picture is 20 feet west of the property line. The property line lies about 15 feet to the right of the right edge of this picture. Photo A is a picture taken in May of 1997 of the property line referred to in the document. Page 5. Line 15: The petitioners are proposing that a small "canyon" exists in front of their properties which was filled in the past. We don't believe this is correct. The topology for our property is essentially the same as all of those on the west side of Myrtle between 24th and 25th Street. We have reviewed the street plans used to initially grade Myrtle Ave. in 1910 and 1911, as well as the grading plans for the pavement of Myrtle in 1924. These plans show that filling was done on both sides of Myrtle. This means that some properties on the east side of Myrtle which have been surveyed 30 feet from the center of Myrtle have heights established by this "fill". In actuality, some lots are on fill and some on cuts. But there are no "canyons". The street plans show substantial soil movement from 1911 to 1924. This is because this area is essentially sand dunes. Before the streets and houses were built, the topology was not stable. Just as the property lines of the east side of Myrtle are essentially on the same grade, those on the west side are also the same. A view down the west side of Myrtle (Photo B) shows that all of the front yards are on essentially the same grade. Page 6. Line 17: The dirt placed on our property was put there to avoid further erosion of the sidewalk and to support our block wall. This is discussed in a letter to the city (Attachment 1). Page 8. Line 3: This limitation does not apply here. We are requesting a building permit for a project which will bring the old structure into conformity except for the two minor items in our variance application. Page 8. Line 9: We intend our variance to be in full compliance with state law. Page 8. Line 19: This paragraph is false and does not make sense. Exhibits 2 through 4 do not show that similar variances to ours have not been granted to other properties in the area. Additionally, the petitioners could not determine this since we had yet to apply for any variances when they wrote their document. One of the petitioners, the Dunbabin's (2432 Myrtle Ave.) were granted a similar but far less conforming variance on 3/2/81. This variance allows most of the side yards of the property to remain non -conforming. They were also granted a variance to allow a stairway to encroach three feet into the front yard area. Currently this stairway also projects into the side yard and is constructed of wood (photo C). There is no record of these non -conformities being corrected during a remodel performed under a permit granted 4/28/88. Page 2 Page 8. Line 24: We believe our project is in concurrence with the intent of recent drown zoning additions to the city's master plan. 2427/29 Myrtle is currently classified as a duplex. Our project will reduce density by converting our duplex into a single family home,.which complies with all city requirements for a newly -constructed home except for the two minor variance items. We feel the planning commission can fairly determine if our project is acceptable. Page 9. Line 7: We are not requesting a variance for height limitations. We understand that residents in our area are very concerned about their ocean views, and would like to minimize the height of any development in front of them. However, it should be noted that the petitioners' all have 30 to 35 ft. high homes. Their houses also have similar livable interior size as our project but are located on lots which are smaller. We hope these responses clarify this issue for you. Please call us at 798-9919 if you would like to discuss these issues further. Thank you for you time and consideration. Sincerely, (:::: James V. erry Attachments: Page 3 e Stuart Berry Th 0 to ' . : `' •,, . -.• S. f'�V.- : ,- w I - -. i • .. .--_•�7w.. n'•i.• , •J .'• . . j'-• •_Y.d ., •.1+ - _ ±.. _` . �.ti: • • i [1 .: ' :.•.:1,�'•sso�n .�.!,,. alt1 - ^! ,r . .' '.----. • e R P1/)aro 13 1Q -1-o _ Jim and Jane Berry 2429 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: (310) 798 9919 Fax: (310) 798 9939 April 21, 1997 Charlie Swartz Senior Building Inspector, Building Division Community Development Department City of Hermosa Beach Dear Mr. Swartz: This letter is in response to your memo dated March 27, 1997 which was faxed to our architects. Regarding to the earth I had dumped on the east end of my property in late 1996, it was my understanding at the time that it was acceptable for me to do so. A few years ago after clearing a variety of large cacti, weeds, and desert plants from our yard it was apparent that the soil had seriously eroded away from the block wall and from under the sidewalk on the Myrtle Ave. end of the property. The sidewalk had sunken and the footing of the block wall adjacent to it was exposed. I called the Hermosa Beach building department to inquire about adding earth to our property. I was advised that I could dump dirt on our property without a permit, as long as the depth was less than 4 ft., no structures were to be built on the fill, and we did not build any walls over 3 ft. in height. In late 1996, we added dirt to stabilize the erosion from below the sidewalk and restore our front yard grade to the sidewalk level to help retain the=block wall. Before the soil was compacted, a Hermosa Beach building inspector posted a stop work notice on our property. I contacted him and explained that we were filling in soil that had been eroded and had been previously advised by the city as described above. He said that I should remove the notices and complete the compaction of the soil but should not add any additional dirt without contacting the city first. We then compacted the soil and planted a ground cover of plants to avoid further erosion. I have discussed the sidewalk erosion issue with Ron Simpson from Public Works. My architect and I will work with him and your department to determine the best approach for permanently repairing the sidewalk and providing for proper drainage of our proposed development. Please call me at 798-9919 if you have any questions. Jim and Jane Berry 2429 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: (310) 798 9919 Fax: (310) 798 9939 May 21, 1997 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld Director, Community Development City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 re: Calculation of Allowable Height for Project at 2429 Myrtle Avenue Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, RECEIVED HAY 211997 • ‘41‘.11‘11. -(7 DEPT. Thisletter. documents the method we used to calculate the east propertyline elevations for our project. The planning staff has notified me that the height of the property at 2459 Myrtle Ave. was established using the west edge of the sidewalk located on the east end of that lot. Since 2459 Myrtle is the most recent construction on the west side of Myrtle, and has the same general topology as our lot, this method is the most appropriate for us to use. This sidewalk elevation also represents the "nearest public improvement". We are submitting our plans using this same method to calculate the elevation of the east end of our lot. Elevations of the west end of the sidewalk which is on the Myrtle Ave. end of our lot, and our property corners on the west ( Ozone Ct.) end, are used to interpolate the elevation at our property line. For the elevation of the south east corner, we have estimated the original height of the west end of the sidewalk prior to the erosion of our property. The attached figure shows the method of calculation. Sincerely, James V.`$erry Stuart Berry Attachment: 2429 Myrtle East Property Line Elevation Calculations 5 7��:J .Grade /00,0? • t• 1 • • XIS/Iv►9 99,E (« r. Wert' .1t - MeV, q S,S) < 22. Zg 30, Po Src'f�o e) 4 f :,-/l 17.25 • / (1:04 i ./Z.E, Cot- nor F/�v��o7: (too.o1 -$5.3) (99,7/. -r -7,7s) Q -/37G '; /OO:oq-7,�75(0d370 199'.021 135 (100.06- 1s,5) %(94,����-7 �s`)= 'Sp:i3��• 100.06j_ 7-75-( 0. ).- 9'901L /..l '7 /-7 0 M ... h A , �'„ �,, /, N i `� /,' �.' i /_ .. l ' I ! 44,A, Appeal of Planning Commission Actions at Meeting of June 17, 1997, regarding Berry Property at 2429 Myrtle Avenue identified as V97-3 July 9, 1997 RECEIVED JUL 1 7 1997 CITY ;:,CR. OFFICE Section 17.04.40 of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Regulations includes objective descriptions for Building Height and Grade. These definitions were included in Ordinance No. 96-1163, October 8, 1996. The code states that "Building Height means a vertical distance measured from grade. (See illustration, page 2). Grade at any point on a lot is determined based on existing corner point elevations, taking into consideration significant variations relative to adjacent properties. In cases where there is significant variation in elevations between adjacent properties at corner points, the point of measurement shall be established based on the elevation at the nearest public improvement or an alternative point within 3 horizontal feet which, based on supporting evidence, represents existing unaltered grade. In the absence of supporting documentation the corner point elevation shall be established at 1/2 the difference between the adjacent elevation and the elevation on the property in question." First of all the corner point elevations of a property must be determined. If there is significant variation between the adjacent properties at corner points, one of the alternative methods for determining the point of measurement may be used. What is significant variation? In his clarification of the then proposed Ordinance No. 96-1163, Michael Shubach included an illustration of grade difference at the property corner points. His illustrations refer to cut and fill situations using retaining walls (See illustration, page 3). Slope is not mentioned in the definition of grade, and any reference to slope has been eliminated. The term flow line of the street is not a term used in the code for determining grade. ° BUILDING HEIGHT GRAPHIC EXAMPLES V BUILDING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FLAT, CONCAVE, OR UNIFORMLY SLOPING LOT 4dell .,.•0Coo.,,,,o., 2 UNEVEN/CONVEX OR VARIABLY SLOPING LOT NOTES: 1. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT HIGHEST POINT ON BUILDING RIDGE OR ROOF 2. GRADE BASED UPON EXISTING CORNER POINT ELEVATIONS 3. GRADE BASED.ON MULTIPLE SPOT ELEVATIONS 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION (17.04)1a EXHIBIT C PROPERTY LINE RETAINING WALLS 0 CORNER POINT RETAINING WALLS PROPERTY LINE EXAMPLE OF GRADE DIFFERENCE AT PROPERTY LINE 3 Jim and Jane Berry's architect knew the code. In early spring, 1997, Jane and Jim Berry submitted building plans for 2429 Myrtle Avenue. According to these plans the grade of their property was determined by using the 4 corner point elevations, the eastern 2 points having been elevated with fill dirt in November, 1996. The east corner points on the Berry property are 8 feet west of the side walk. As far as we know the west corner point elevations have not been altered and therefore will not be referred to. Because the Building Department was aware that fill dirt had been added to the east corner points of the property, raising the elevations of these points , the Building Department made the decision that the east points of measurement would be "established based on the elevations at the nearest public improvement" instead of requiring the applicants to file a proper survey showing the elevation of the unaltered east corner points. Neighboring property owners questioned the city's using an alternative method of determining grade since the two unaltered eastern corner point elevations were never determined. The height calculation was referred to the Planning Commission on June 17, 1997. The Planning Commission agreed with the Building Department's decision. Before the dumping of 4 truckloads of dirt unto the Berry property in November, 1996, the lot was a concave lot sloping from east to west, Myrtle to Ozone. There were concrete steps, which are still in existence below the fill dirt, that followed the elevation of the sloping lot. If the true east corner point elevations were determined, we believe the city would have no reason to use alternate points for grade. 2429 Myrtle Avenue l• I Scale I _ 1/4"=4' U 4 i _I Ori ginal Slope • I I- I- I C n 0 0 Photo takenNovember, 1996 One of the truckloads of fill dirt July, 1997 Berry's sign warning of dangerous conditions 5 Before the November, 1996, dumping of the dirt, there was no significant variation in elevation between the Berry property and the property to the north (2435 Myrtle) at the northeast corner point.. There is an elevated drive way at the corner point; however, the top of this structure was built above the grade of the north property. This was not a cut and fill situation. Photo taken July, 1997 Although the elevation of the Berry property has been raised significantly, this photo does show the driveway structure and the slope of the adjacent property. Before the November, 1996, dumping of dirt, there was no significant variation in elevation between the Berry property and the property to the south at the south east corner point. The Berry lot had a concave slope. Prior to the dirt dumping Mr. Berry had increased the height of the concrete and rock retaining wall that Is located directly south of his property line. When Mr. Berry raised the elevation of his property, he also raised the elevation of the area around his south east corner point and the property to the south . (See picture, page 9.) Photo taken in 1992 Note the concrete steps Before the November, 1996, dumping of dirt there was no significant variation in elevation between the east property and the Berry property at the corner points. The Berry property line is located 8 feet west of the Myrtle sidewalk and 30 feet west of the center line of Myrtle Avenue. At the east corner points there is no significant variation in elevation. Photo taken 1992 Note the concrete steps Photos taken July, 1997 Note that the concrete steps are buried under the fill dirt. Note concrete and rock retaining wall'built up by Jim Berry. 9 While looking at the Berry survey map, we observed that it was dated May, 1994, and feel this date could cause some confusion. Three revisions have been made since this original survey. #1 is inconsequential since it deals with revision of street names. #2 and #3 revisions deal with added elevations in the east section of the property in question. These revisions were made in December, 1996, and May, 1997, after the dirt was added. In November, after witnessing the dumping of the dirt we informed the city that dirt was being added to the east side of the Berry's property. At that time a representative of the city went to the Berry's property and witnessed the amount of dirt that was being added. The Berrys were told to stop dumping dirt on the property and it was noted in their file to watch for any building plans that might come through. For safety reasons, the Berrys were asked to compact the soil. This compacting was done at dark and with the slamming of a redwood picnic bench. No inspection , that we know of, was made of the property. We believe dangerous conditions exist from the unprofessionally compacted soil, which is located on the city easement. (See picture, page 5.) What would have happened if the Berrys had not dumped the dirt? There would have been no confusion. The code is objective. Historically owners in the area have applied the building code properly using the corner point elevations of their lots to determine grade.. If the city had used the code accordingly, the corner point elevations would have had to be determined. No alternative points would have been used. Solutions: 1. Use the Berry's survey that was completed before November, 1996, if it includes the corner point elevations before November, 1996. 2. Remove dirt from the existing steps and determine approximate elevation of the corner points. 10 3. Remove all dirt fill and require a new survey of the original grade of the property. After the corner point elevations are determined, then the grade can be determined. The Berrys say there was erosion. As seen in our "before" photos the east end (See pages 7 and 8) of their lot was covered with significant ground cover consisting of dense ice plant and other succulents that had been there since we moved to Myrtle in 1980. In our seventeen years there was little if any erosion. Prior to the dumping of the dirt, the Berrys removed the ground cover and all plantings. Since we have resided on Myrtle Avenue, the sidewalk has always been in the condition it is today. Hermosa Beach has a well thought out, objective Building Code. It should be applied correctly and consistently to all Hermosa Beach properties including the Berrys. According to the Building Code, the city of Hermosa Beach should have required the Berrys to furnish the pre -November, 1996, corner point elevations of their property. It did not. According to the Building Code, the Planning Commission should have required the Berrys to furnish the pre -November, 1996, corner point elevations of their property. It did not. Hopefully the City Council will apply the Building Code and require the Berrys to furnish the pre -November. 1996, corner point elevations and then determine the grade using these corner point elevations. Sincerely, Kathy Dunbabin / i 1DG2'1'ta4 -- John Dunbabin 12 • The Beach Reporter • July 10, 1997 -WHAT DO YOU THINK? •••••••.••••••••••• Construction is often a source of conflict among neighbors (see story, Page 6). In Manhattan Beach every year, dozens of police reports are filed by neighbors who are upset about noise, debris or damage generated by nearby construction. Unfor- tunately, many times there is little that the city or the police depart- ment can do, since oftentimes there is no criminal action involved or no violation of any city code. In fact, there is not a city code in place for every issue. Manhattan Beach does have a noise ordi- nance in place and residents who wish to report a violation should do so. The city and police department will often refer the disputing neighbors to the Dispute Resolution Service in Hermosa Beach, which assists in helping neighbors work out their differences. But the neighbors have to be willing to cooperate. In many cases, neigh- bors are often left to work it out among themselves, which can be an impossible task in the case where neither side is willing to co- operate. • What do you think of the city codes in place, as they per- tain to construction? • Do you think the current codes should be changed or added to? • Do you have any other solutions for dealing with disputes between neighbors -over construction? • What's your opinion of the current noise ordinance? • What's your opinion of the Dispute Resolution Service as a solution to the problem of disputing neighbors? Turn in or mail your comments to "What Do You Think?", The Beach Re- porter, P.O. Box 383, Manhattan Beach, Calif. 90266. The newspaper will print letters that are fairly brief and lraihle. and not li- WE GET LETTERS Editor's note: Last week, we asked our readers about the condominium project on Highland Avenue in Manhattan Beach. Commission should be reliable The "facts" about the 3016 and 3020 Highland condos have half a dozen lawyers talking about gray areas. That should tell you something right there. To cut to the chase, the Planning Com- mission is required to ensure that these condos are compatible with the neighbor- hood. These four condos, once built, would always stick out like a sore thumb (read incompatible) since all future build- ing in the neighborhood must follow the March election's guidelines. The Planning Commission needs to tell the developer to redraw his plans to con- form to the height law and resubmit them (not a small task, admittedly; but then, the developer hasn't been in any hurry before — his plans date from 1990-91). We have a law now governing heights and whether or not we all agree with it, we need to stick to it. The value of a Man- hattan Beach home is often a huge part of a family's assets, and the families in this city need to know what they can depend on when they buy and sell property. Building heights will always be an issue in this city because of views. The way to make height less of an issue is to have one legal standard and support it, come hell or high water. Give the greater weight to the law, not to the individual/ weird circumstances that people want to use to justify their positions. Be reliable, not capricious. In the long run, that's what's fair to everyone. Alison Edwards Manhattan Beach Doesn't understand the logic Nnu, IPt me cf.!. if T have thic richt Ctnn We, the undersigned, are neighbors and live in the vicinity of the Jane and Jim,Berry property located at 2429 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. We strongly oppose the June 17, 1997, Hermosa Beach Planning Commission's decision to grant the Berrys a variance which will allow over a 100% addition. We also strongly oppose the commission's decision to allow the "nearest public improvement" to be used as the base point to calculate the height of the Berry addition. As neighbors we are convinced that the Commission's decision is detrimental to us as individual residents and as a neighborhood. p Q j i1 Name Signature Roher-t j' /'1,llc_! O .- 44-.,,.. �j0k' 5' (1l)J,k bk y19e_l a ? P,tevSe i 41) l f. - r iN\ L/,'or4 L ((95 7`z �i,6Cr. . \jV) et\) \\\O Address 02 ne /-fre,.(c a mr2TL � . /1/1;k 4>e -2,0--7 Air 4- di 6-7 fyg7L AV , 4,LOA ily,-\\QA424d _1506 m.y'cII t / e 2442D i)1 v2 FCC: AUh RECEIVED 71997 CITY MGR. OFFICE We, the undersigned, are neighbors and live in the vicinity of the Jane and Jim Berry property located at 2429 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. We strongly oppose the June 17, 1997, Hermosa Beach Planning Commission's decision to grant the Berrys a variance which will allow over a 100% addition. We also strongly oppose the commission's decision to allow the "nearest public improvement" to be used as the base point to calculate the height of the Berry addition. As neighbors we are convinced that the Commission's decision is detrimental to us as individual residents and as a neighborhood. P24 T Name SW403fi 5 Peace Notes 64w,o &se,2u, ,&4' .y,v 30�/ STEJ� Pa:- tz S /1)6QD P5 �c*ItJ 'DuNJQS) A) %L4. T4/4.ore, L i! � Address 3t ?- srsr 2.41.15 M)+-4. M-• 3c Z ztf?'--'S. zl l4 Yfl y,2rL AV E, Zv b M• A✓a. 24384fr 1-yJ 2.432. ft2 likrze Av. m y S -.)V“ picker6iXa a 3 E a s,a 2..A.% 2_ ONL,„r?sk..,,A) ,2,7mid/' ; 70, LAW OFFICES OWEN D. PETERSEN July 17, 1997 RECEIVED Jut 171997 CITY MGR. OFFICE Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Application for a variance by Jim Berry Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: Suite 1030, Union Bank Tower Del Amo Financial Center 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard Torrance, California 90503 Telephone: (310) 540-0633 Telefax: (310) 540-8734 This office has been retained to represent John and Kathy Dunbabin. They reside at 2432 Myrtle Ave. Their residence is directly across the street from Mr. Berry's proposed rebuild. My clients object to the proposal on the following grounds: 1. A variance is not proper. State law requires that the subject property be subject to unnecessary hardship and practical difficulties UNIQUE TO THIS PROPERTY, and not applicable to other properties in the area. In this case, Mr. Berry's property is almost identical to other properties. Please not that the burden of proof with regard to this issue is on Mr. Berry. 2. A variance is not proper because it would result in an adverse effect on surrounding properties, and be detrimental to the surrounding area. The planning staff, in their recommendation to the planning commission, stated that this variance was "not unlike other variances in the area. Please not that under California law, this is not grounds for issuing a variance. In California, there is no precedence for a variance based on other properties, and each property must be judged individually. This remodel would substantially impair the views of each property owner east of Myrtle, and effectively change one of the lowest silhouettes in their view corridor to one of the highest. 3. The measurement of height is improper. Mr. Berry brought in four truckloads of dirt to raise the height of his lot, and this the allowable height of his rebuild. He must not be allowed to prosper by this blatant attempt to circumvent the height requirements, and should be ordered to remove the fill dirt. It was also dumped without any permit or inspection, or proper compaction, and now Mr. Berry is complaining about erosion of the new dirt. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 17, 1997 Page Two 3. Mr. Berry's east elevations should be measured at the property line after the identification and removal of all the illegal fill dirt which he trucked to the premises. 4. The title to Mr. Berry's lot must be proven. At the present time, it appears that their neighbor to the south has a prescriptive easement over the Berry's lot, and that issue must be resolved before the building plan can be approved. A request for a variance is a request for an equitable remedy. The applicant must come forward with clean hands when requesting that the building code be waived. In this case, Mr. Berry proved that he did not have good faith when he surreptitiously trucked in fill dirt to raise his property level on the east side. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that Defendant's request for a variance be denied. Respectfully submitted, OWEN D. PETERSEN Attorney at Law ODP/aa cc: John and Kathy Dunbabin Dean Nota / Linda Jo Russell Page 1. Mail: 2467 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Voice: 310.374.5535 Facsimile: 310.376.2352 Date: July 15, 1997 To: Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: Mayor: J. R. Reviczky Mayor Pro Tem Sam Edgerton Council Member Robert Benz Council Member John Bowler Council Member Julie Oakes RECEIVED JUL 1 71997 CITY MGR, OFFICE Regarding Sideyard variance and determination of height limit measurement for Proposed remodel and addition to 2429 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach It has come to our attention that the owners of the property at 2429 Myrtle have requested certain variances with respect to their proposed addition and remodel of their residence. While we are pleased to find that a property on our street will be improved to the benefit of the neighborhood, we are concerned that the scope of this addition exceeds the limits set by City ordinances regulating projects of this type. It is our impression that such limits are necessary in order to limit the impacts of substandard parking, setbacks and other non -conforming elements, that materially impact adjacent properties and the quality of the neighborhood in general. s We .observed the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission's actions regarding this project on the local cable TV channel and we believe that the Commission's approval of variances for a non -conforming, 2.2' side yard, a non conforming sideyard stair combined with a 135% addition to the existing residence does not comply with Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and State Law. The Need for a Variance Section 17.52.030 clearly limits the Planning Commission's discretionary approval of such remodel additions to projects that do not exceed a 100% increase in the valuation of the existing building, based on ICBG replacement building costs. As you know, non -conforming projects that exceed the 100% valuation limit must be brought into conformance with all zoning and building code requirements, or a variance must be granted. Section 17.54.020 states that in order for a variance to be granted, 4 findings must be made by the Commission: 1. Exceptional circumstances applicable to the property involved; 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity of the subject property; 3. That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; 4. That the granting of the variance will not conflict with the provisions of, or be detrimental to, the general plan. These findings were not clearly made by the Commission, nor were they specifically addressed by the applicant in his presentation. In the discussion of the motion for approval, the commissioners in favor seemed to feel that this was a routine Dean Nota / Linda Jo Russell Page 2. approval, the commissioners in favor seemed to feel that this was a routine discretionary approval of a project with minor non -conformities. It is our hope that it is not routine for projects of this scope (greater than 100% additions) to be approved without the necessary findings when they are required. Height Limit Measuring Points Several months ago, we observed a construction crew depositing a significant amount of fill (more than 50 cu. yds.) on the upper part of this property and it is now. our understanding that this fill was placed without proper design or inspection by a soils engineer, or the issuance of a grading permit. Apparently, the majority of this fill was also placed on public right-of-way without the issuance of an encroachment permit and the necessary insurance endorsements that are required by other residents that construct improvements on public property. It now seems that there is some question with respect to the measurement of the height of the proposed building because the original property corner points were covered by the placement of this fill. It was our observation that the Planning Commission rewarded the applicants for altering the corner elevations by granting them base elevations at the nearest public improvement, which appears to be significantly higher than the original corners. It is our hope that these observations will aide the Council in your consideration of these issues and clarify the intent of the laws governing future developments of this type. Sincerely, Dean Nota Jo Russell c11O 01a 41e. 917-11' 3 as antaigta 4-A/M 041 17 --TA-U-1121w�cO July 15, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 97-2 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER ADDING MASSAGE THERAPY AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission Recommendations 1. To amend the Zoning Ordinance to define and add "Massage Therapy Business" as a conditionally permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 zones; 2. -To add special licensing provisions and minimum requirements for a massage therapy business to the Municipal Code. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 17, 1997, voted 5:0 to recommend the subject Zoning Ordinance amendments, and to further recommend City Council adoption of special regulations in the Business Licensing Section of the Municipal Code. Currently the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code regulates Massage in the following ways: The Zoning Ordinance Defines "Massage Parlor" as follows: "Massage parlor" means an establishment where a massage, alcohol rub, fomentation, electric or magnetic treatment, or similar treatment or manipulation of the human body is administered, unless such treatment or manipulation is administered by a medical practitioner, chiropractor, acupuncturist, physical therapist or similar professional person licensed by the state. This definition does not include an athletic club, health club, school, gymnasium, reducing salon, spa, or similar establishment where massage or similar manipulation of the human body is offered as an incidental or accessory service. The Zoning Ordinance also defines "Adult Massage Parlor", and specifically does not allow it as a permitted use since noting it is not a form of speech protected by the First Amendment. "Massage Parlor" is not listed as a permitted use in any zone. Section 5.04, Business Licenses, includes Classification B, Group 8 "Massage Parlor. Practicing physiotherapy, health and physical culture establishments --$75 per annum plus $10 per operator." Initiation of this study was requested by a local practicing massage therapist who requested to be considered as similar to a health and fitness center and open an independent massage business. 5 Analysis Staff reviewed several other cities ordinances dealing with massage and massage businesses, which have instituted various levels of regulation to deal with licensing of businesses and massage practitioners, health and sanitation, and prevention of criminal acts. In the interest of creating opportunities for massage therapy businesses, while not unduly infringing on existing massage being offered as secondary to other uses, or creating unnecessary and burdensome regulations, staff focused on the issue of businesses which will be involved in massage as their primary activity. Massage offered as secondary to another business does not bring up the same concerns since the massage therapist, or technician working under the auspices of a spa, health club, or chiropractor takes up only a portion of a business space. These businesses, because space is shared, typically already have sanitary facilities, management practices to ensure cooperative use, and are insured.' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The requirement to obtain a C.U.P. will give the City the ability to evaluate each potential business applicant relative to the location and project specifics. The Planning Commission may impose conditions related to specific locational issues, or to deal with any anticipated project specific concerns. Other than the location or unique project specific issues, massage businesses should be regulated through a standardized permit and licensing process separate from the C.U.P. Therefore the text amendment for the Zoning Ordinance is limited to defining, and establishing "massage therapy business" as a conditionally permitted use on the permitted use list, conditioned upon management by a licensed massage therapist as recommended below. The Planning Commission recommended that opportunities for massage therapy businesses be allowed in the C-2 and C-3 zones. MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS LICENSING Staff is recommending a new chapter in the Municipal Code, Business License section to effect the licensing of the individual business operator with the main provisions summarized as follows: The business shall be owned and/or operated by an on- premises City licensed Massage Therapist. Since there are no state licensing or certification for massage therapists, special licensing provisions are recommended to establish a City license for a Massage Therapist with the following requirements: • The submittal of a detailed application for approval by the Police Chief, with authority to conduct a background check and fingerprinting if deemed necessary; • A minimum training requirement for massage, including ethics, from a State recognized school, or comparable school in another State (500 hours); 2- • Training and maintenance through American Heart Association or Red Cross and certification to practice CPR and first aid; • An annual health clearance, that the therapist is free from communicable diseases. The business must be maintained in sanitary condition with the following requirements: • Separate enclosed storage for soiled and clean towels/linens • Accessibility to private changing rooms and toilets, and hot and cold running water • Cleaning and disinfecting massage instruments/equipment CONCUR: Sol Blumenf ld, irector Communi ; I evelopment Department I1 steph-e‘rit .1: City Manag en Robertson Associate Planner Val Straser Police Chief 'Several other cities which have adopted massage provisions, specifically require special licensing regulations for any and all persons engaging in massage. Thus, individuals who may be operating in another business or on an outcall basis (typically called " massage technicians" or " massage practitioners") are also required to meet minimum education levels, and go through Police background checks (with the exception of massage being provided by State Licensed Medical practitioners). Staff does not believe these additional regulations are necessary at this time, given that there are no current problems, and given the limited resources available to the City to effectively enforce and monitor compliance with such regulations. Also, the State may eventually take up this issue and provide statewide regulation of massage as is currently the practice in many other States. Attachments 1. Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2. Proposed Ordinance for Massage Therapy Licensing and Regulation 3. P.C. Resolution, Minutes 4. Background information (Several other cities'massage ordinances are available on file) kr/c/winword/cc/srmssage 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE 97 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE COMMERCIAL LAND USE REGULATIONS TO ADD "MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June 17, 1997 to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to add `massage therapy" as a permitted use, subject to a Conditional Use Permit and to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The current list of permitted uses includes allow massage therapy only in conjunction with and incidental to another use such as a health and fitness center, or medical clinic; B. Massage Therapy is a commonly accepted alternative to traditional medicine, and as a supplemental treatment, to improve mental and physical health; C. Making the establishment of a massage therapy business subject to obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, will allow a case by case review of any proposed location or type of establishment to ensure compatibility with surroundings, and consistency with the intent of the commercial zone; D. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section 15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that the modification to the text may have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby ordain that the Municipal Code, Title 17, Zoning, be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend the land use matrix under Section 17.26.030, Land Use Regulations to add the following in alphabetical order within the matrix: CC v2 Massage Therapy Business U U 17:40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 2. 1. Eliminate the definition for `Massage Parlor" from the Adult use definition Section 17.04.060. 2. Add the following Definition to Section 17.04.050 in alphabetical order Massage Therapy Business. An establishment offering massage, alcohol rub, fomentation, electric or magnetic treatment, or similar treatment or manipulation of the human body, unless such treatment or manipulation is administered by a medical practitioner, chiropractor, acupuncturist, physical therapist or similar professional person licensed by the state as part of a medical clinic. This definition excludes a gymnasium/health and fitness center, school, barber/beauty shop, or similar establishment where massage or similar manipulation of the human body is offered by an individual as an incidental or accessory service and does not occupy more than 25% of the area of the establishment. This definition also specifically excludes Adult Massage as defined in Section 17.04.060 SECTION 3. Add the following to Chapter 17.40 "17.40.160 Massage Therapy Business The following conditions and standards of operation, in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compatibility with existing or permitted uses in the vicinity, shall be re q ..uired: 1. A licensed Massage Therapist, pursuant to Chapter 5.74 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, shall be on the premises at all times when the business is open. The business may employ technicians or aides only if supervised by a licensed Massage Therapist. 2. Management shall adopt, inform patrons and employees of, and strictly enforce all requirements of the Conditional Use Permit, and all regulations as set forth in Chapter 5.74. 3 Hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. or other hours as. established by the Planning Commission if deemed necessary because of proximity to residential uses. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of 5 1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manneeprovided by law. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of by the following vote: S AYES: NOES: AB STAIN: AB SENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY cclerk/ordins/new/ordzmass 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE. 97 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.04 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE DEALING WITH LICENSING FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS, AND ADDING CHAPTER 5.74 TO REGULATE MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESSES. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Massage and other similar business offering therapeutic services that have a legitimate place in the local business community. The City Council recognizes that the majority of massage therapy businesses are legitimate and desirable, however, sometimes such businesses are use to harbor illegal activity. B. It is therefore necessary, in the interest of protecting the public health, safety, and welfare, to regulate massage business to ensure only legitimate massage businesses are permitted to operate within the City; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section to read as follows 5.04, Classification B, Group 8: " Group 8: Massage parlef therapy, practicing physiotherapy, health and physical culture establishments --seventy five dollars (75.00) per annum plus ten dollars (10.00) for each operator. Issuance of a business license for an independent Massage Therapy businesses requires prior approval of a Conditional Use Permit and compliance with the licensing requirements of Section 5.74. SECTION 2. Add Chapter 5.74 in its entirety to read as follows: "Sec. 5.74.010 Definitions 7 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 "Massage Therapy Business". An establishment offering massage, alcohol rub, fomentation, electric or magnetic treatment, or similar treatment or manipulation of the human body, unless such treatment or manipulation is administered by a medical practitioner, chiropractor, acupuncturist, physical therapist or similar professional person licensed by the state as part of a medical clinic. This definition excludes a gymnasium/health and fitness center, school, barber/beauty shop, or similar establishment where massage or similar manipulation of the human body is offered by an individual as an incidental or accessory service and does not occupy more than 25% of the area of the establishment. This definition also specifically excludes Adult Massage as defined in Section 17.04.060. Sec. 5.74.020 Massage Therapy Business Location - Conditional Use Permit Required Before any location and building may be used for the purposes of massage therapy a Conditional Use Permit shall be obtained pursuant to Chapter 17.40 of the Zoning Ordinance. Sec. 5.74.030 Massage Therapy Business - Massage Therapist License Required The business shall be owned and/or operated by an on- premises City licensed Massage Therapist, meeting the minimum qualification as set forth in this Chapter. Every person conducting, managing, owning, or operating a massage therapy business in the City, as defined in Section, shall procure a license in the manner prescribed in this section. Sec. 5.74.040 Massage Therapist - Training and Education Required A massage therapy business shall at all times be conducted, managed, and/or supervised by an on -premises Massage Therapist. The following are the minimum education and training requirements for a Massage Therapist: A. Completion of a minimum of five hundred (500) hours of training in the theory, method, profession, and work.of massage therapy from a recognized school, evidenced by a diploma or certificate of graduation from a recognized school; B. Training and maintenance of certification to practice CPR and First Aid from the American Heart Associate, Red Cross, or the State of California; 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Sec. 5.74.050 License Application Every person desiring to obtain a license shall make application to the City Finance Department. The applicant shall provide the following: A. The full name, residence and business address, and telephone numbers of the applicant, and the name under which the proposed business is to be conducted; B. The full name, business address, residence address, and telephone numbers of any copartners, excluding limited partners, of the applicant; C. The full name, residence and business address, and telephone numbers of the property owner, in which the business is to be located, and written consent of said owner to operation of the business orfa copy of the lease for the premises executed by the owner evidencing such consent; D. Applicant's height, weight, color of eyes and hair, age, date, and place of birth; E. The nature, name and place of applicant's business or employment during the five years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the application; F. A two-inch square photograph of the applicant taken within sixty days immediately prior to the date the application is filed; G. Such other identification and information as the Police Chief may require in order to discover the truth of the matters herein before specific to the set forth in the application, including the right to take the fingerprints and any additional photographs or to confirm the height and weight of the applicant; H. Record of convictions of violation of law, excluding minor traffic violations; I. A certificate from a medical doctor stating that the applicant has, within sixty days prior thereto, been examined a found to be free of any contagious or communicable disease; J. A statement in writing by the applicant that he or she, certified under penalty of perjury, that all information contained in the application is true and correct 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Sec. 5.74.060 Facilities Necessary A license shall not be issued pursuant to this Chapter unless an inspection by the City shows the business establishment complies with each of the following requirements; A. Minimum lighting shall be provided in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, and at least one artificial light of at least forty (40) watts shall be provided in each enclosed room or booth where massage services are being performed; B. All instruments used in massage shall be cleaned and disinfected; C. Hot and Cold running water, soap or detergent, and sanitary towels or air dryer shall be available on the premises; D. Dressing and toilet facilities shall be provided for patrons; E. Separate enclosed cabinets or containers shall be provided for storage of clean and soiled towels and linen; Sec. 5.74-070 Conduct of the Business A. The massage therapy business shall have at least one person who has a valid Massage Therapist license pursuant to this chapter on the premises during all operating hours. B. Clean and sanitary towels and linens (washed in hot water a minimum of 140 degrees Fahrenheit) shall be provided for each patron of the business. C. Standard or portable massage tables or a mat suitable for shiatsu or accupressure shall be used. Foam pads more than four inches thick or with a width of more than four feet may not be used, Beds , mattresses, and water beds may not be used, nor may be present anywhere on the premises. Sec. 5.74-080 Investigation Upon receipt of a complete application it shall be forwarded to the Police Chief who shall conduct an appropriate investigation of determine whether said permit shall be issued in accordance with this chapter. /o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 • 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Sec. 5.74-090 Conditions for Issuance of License After investigation, and report by the Chief of Police, the City shall issue or renew the license only when all of following conditions are met: A. A completed written application form has been filed B. The required application fee has been paid. C. The applicant has complied with all provisions of this Chapter and the Municipal Code D. That the building and facilities comply with all of the health, zoning, fire, building and safety requirement and standards of the State of California and the City; E. That the applicant, his, her, or its employees, agents, partners, directors, officers, shareholders, associates or managers or any person connected with the business for which the applicant is requesting a permit hereunder: 1. Has not been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction, of: a) A violation of Health and Safety Code Section 1155, or b) A violation of Penal Code Sections 266I, 315, 316, 318, or 647(b), or c) Has been convicted in any other State of any offense which, if committed or attempted in this State, would have been punished as one or more of the above mentioned offenses, or 2. Is not required to register under the provisions of Penal Code Section 290 3. Has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement in the application or in any report or record filed with the Chief of Police 4. Has not had a permit or license for a similar type business revoked by the City or any other jurisdiction within the past three years: SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. t! 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: AB SENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f:/cclerk/ordins/new/ordmass 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 RESOLUTION P.C. 97-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USE LIST TO ADD "MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 17, 1997 to consider adding "massage therapy" as a permitted use, subject to a Conditional Use Permit and made the following Findings: A. The current list of permitted uses includes allow massage therapy only in conjunction with and incidental to another use such as a health and fitness center, or medical clinic; B. Massage Therapy is a commonly accepted alternative to traditional medicine, and as a supplemental treatment, to improve mental and physical health; C. Making the establishment of a massage therapy business subject to obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, will allow a case by case review of any proposed location or type of establishment to ensure compatibility with surroundings, and consistency with the intent of the commercial zone; D. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section 15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that the modification to the text may have a significant effect on the environment. 22 NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: 23 24 SECTION 1. Amend the land use matrix under Section 17.26.030, Land Use Regulations to add the following in alphabetical order within the matrix: 25 26 27 " Massage Therapy Business 28 � SECTION 2. 29 U U 17.40 Eliminate the definition for "Massage Parlor" from the Adult use definition Section 17.04.060. [3 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2. Add the following Definition to Section 17.04.050 in alphabetical order Massage Therapy Business. An establishment offering massage, alcohol rub, fomentatibn, electric or magnetic treatment, or similar treatment or manipulation of the human body, unless such treatment or manipulation is administered by a medical practitioner, chiropractor, acupuncturist, physical therapist or similar professional person licensed by the state as part of a medical clinic. This definition excludes a gymnasium/health and fitness center, school, barber/beauty shop, or similar establishment where massage or similar manipulation of the human body is offered by an individual as an incidental or accessory service and does not occupy more than 25% of the area of the establishment. This definition also specifically excludes Adult Massage as defined in Section 17.04.060 SECTION M. Add the following to Chapter 17.40 "17.40.160 Massage Therapy Business The following conditions and standards of operation, in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compatibility with existing or permitted uses in the vicinity, shall be required: 1. A licensed Massage Therapist, pursuant to Chapter 5.74 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, shall be on the premises at all times when the business is open. The business may employ technicians or aides only if supervised by a licensed Massage Therapist. 2. Management shall adopt, inform patrons and employees of, and strictly enforce all requirements of the Conditional Use permit, and all regulations as set forth in Chapter 5.74. 3:Hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. or other hours as established by the Planning Commission if deemed necessary because of proximity to residential uses. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Perrotti, Pizer, Schwartz, Merl, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 97-46 is a true and complete record of the action aken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their re: i ar eeting Jun j 17, 1997. Peter Tucker, - 5-97 Date kr/C:kr/winword/pc/rsmassag Sol Blumenfeld, cretary Discussion Comm. Perrotti said the fireplace could be considered a substantial property right, and he agr wi Staff on the height issue. Chmn. Tucker agreed with Staff on their recommendation : to where e grade is. He said the applicant is willing to alleviate the side yard problem e the north side, and should be granted the variance on the south side. MOTION by Co be used as grade. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN: Perrotti, seconded by Comm. Schwartz, that the n- . est public improvement Comms. Merl, ' -rrotti, Pizer, Schwartz, C ... Tucker None None None MOTION by Comm. Perrotti, seconde 2.2 feet deny. the 0' sideyard Vari the building and allow it at 17.• eet. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABST y Co . ' izer, to ALLOW the variance for the south e on the north a • find that the garage is a functional part of -Comm ' errotti, Pizer, Churn. Tucker Co u s. Schwartz, Merl one None Tuckerstated that these decisions are appealable to the City Council within 10 13. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD MASSAGE THERAPY AS CONDITIONAL PERMITTED USE IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend City Council approval. Director Blumenfeld stated that at the previous Commission meeting the Commission recommended proceeding with the text amendment to consider adding massage therapy as a conditionally permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 zones. Recommendations are made that City Council amend the Zoning Ordinance to define and add massage therapy businesses as a conditionally permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 zones and that the City Council add special licensing provisions and minimal requirements to operate such a business. This proposed text amendment seeks to make this a permitted use in either the C-2 and C-3 zones and would also subject the use to a conditional use permit as part of the permit requirement. There are also recommendations for licensing and Staff has looked to some of the adjacent cities, which have dealt with this issue, in order to compile the provisions of licensing. Indicating staffs recommendation is to approve the text amendment and the licensing provisions as outlined in the Staff report. Churn. Tucker opened the public hearing at 10:26 p.m. P.C. Minutes 6-17-97 (S Maureen Gray, 708 El Redondo, would like to see some standards and guidelines for massage therapists to be qualified. She said it might be wise to specify that the certification comes from the American Heart Association or the Red Cross and also that we include CPR. Regarding health clearance, the major concern is tuberculosis, which is an easy test to perform. If a doctor was to issue a note to say you're free from communicable diseases, he'd have to do a hepatitis test and an AIDS test. These diseases are communicable, but they do get transmitted through pathways which should not occur in a massage. Judy Luce, 1636 Hermosa Avenue, is currently a massage therapist licensed in El Segundo, and carries $3 million insurance on her clients. The club she works at also carries $3 million insurance. Regarding the linen issue, she said that some people do cold water wash, but she didn't feel that was sufficient. She felt the law should state at least hot water wash. She also stated that the CPR should probably be certified through the American Heart Association and the Red Cross. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the public hearing at 10:47 p.m. Discussion Comm. Schwartz recommended that CPR comes from the American Heart Association and the Red Cross and that it include first aid. Comm. Perrotti said the third page needed to be changed from disinfecting and sterilizing to clean and disinfecting. Churn. Tucker felt the 140 degree water for washing the linens should be included. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Perrotti to APPROVE the items listed in terms of modifications. AYES: Comms. Perrotti, Pizer, Schwartz, Merl, Churn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 15 TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE PENALTY OF ZONING VIOLA �i MISDEMEANOR AND INFRACTIONS AND ADMINISTRA r WITH FEW ]EP ONS. (Continued from 5/20/97 meeting.) Staff Recommended Action: rove said request. Mr. Schubach stated that the item was discusse amend the Zoning Ordinance providing f. items (bootleg unit would remain building code violations can be controlled t rmg he_sspecial study two months ago, to "infraction" enfOrtem-nt program except for two sdemeanor primarily because it is u I associated with state law have to be a misdemeanor, and parking vi.: '. ns which gh administrative process). Chmn. ucker opened the public hearing at 10:55 p.m. P.C. Minutes 6-17-97 C6 City Land Use Issues Allowed As Permitted Use? Survey of Massage Therapy Requirements (not by State licensed medical practitioners) What Zones? Educational Requirements Licensing Issues Test? Police Department Health Approval? Clearance? Other Special Requirement? • Santa Monica YES: Massage Technician Massage Establishment Off Premises Massage Commercial 150 hours of approved coursework pass city written exam YES: fingerprinting for background check; photo ID card, etc. YES May qualify as exempt from police check and test if in professional. Organization with minimum 300 hours. Listed coursework and continuing education. Torrance Santa Barbara Redondo Beach YES: Massage or Accupressure Establishments (treated like medical uses) Commercial, or Industrial with C.U.P. 200 hours of state licenced coursework YES: L.A. County Health Dept. Test YES: fingerprinting, background check, etc. YES License Review Board Approval YES: As accessory service in existing Health or Day Spa Establishments ("Massage Parlors" not allowed) YES Commercial 200 hours of state licenced coursework NO YES YES: School Certification doctor certification Commercial 100 hours of approved coursework NO YES NO School Certification MASSAGE BY MAUREEN (310)448-0200 January 21, 1997 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, I am writing to you to request your consideration in determining the similarity of my business to one that is permitted in Hermosa Beach according Chapter 17.26. I am a massage therapist with a business license in Hermosa Beach. Previously I was providing massage therapy to clients while working in a beauty salon. Currently I am interested in working independently. The services . I will provide will not be different from those provided as incidental or accessory services through the beauty salon- I woulvl just like to provide them in an office setting, independent of another establishment. I would like to know if my massage business could be considered similar to a permitted use category, allowing me to work for myself. The category of gymnasium/health and fitness center would probably be the closest to my business, as many people know, having a massage is a healthy way to keep fit. The services offered by my company will include hands-on non -sexual massage, reflexology, acupressure, sound therapy and aromatherapy. I will also be a referral service, recommending my clients to various other health care practitioners such as chiropractors, acupuncturists, nutritionists, physical therapists, exercise instructors, and so on. I also have a few product lines I offer to my clients as a complement to the massage business. lb fit the description of gymnasium/health and fitness center, I can say that I supervise my clients as they learn to relax, I instruct people about general health maintenance habits, and I provide a reference library as a resource for issues pertaining to the health and disease of the human body. I conduct my .business professionally and ethically. I present myself in a manner which conveys the purpose and intent of my business: to provide a therapeutic session to a person in need of bodywork. I have been working in Hermosa Beach since April of 1996, so I have an established client base. I have never been propisitioned to conduct myself as described in the paragraphs) defining massage parlors. I believe this is because it is clear to people that I am not in that business. Also, I have attended a 30 hour class regarding boundaries, appropriate behavior and ways to handle inappropriate behavior. I have graduated from a 500 hour training program, qualifying me as a massage therapist. I have a certificate from the school I attended, The Institute of Psycho -Structural Balancing. I am a member of the International Massage Therapists Association which provides a million dollar liability policy for me. My background is in open-heart surgery --in my first career I was a perAisionist in charge of operating the heart lung machine during bypass or valve replacement surgeries. After ten years of that I decided to develop my lifelong hobby into a business. lb operate legally in Hermosa Beach independent of others, I realize I need a determination of similarity to a permitted use and approval of the City Council. I would appreciate your consideration in this matter, and I hope you see fit to present this to the City Council as a consent calendar item . I look forward to a response as soon as possible because I ani hoping to rent office space in a great location before someone else does. R,}espectfully, i Via& Maureen E. Gray 100000 Masse Laws Nalionwi e Twenty states, plus the District of Columbia, cur- rently offer some type of credential—usually a license, certification or registration—to practicing massage therapists. Massage Magazine presents thisinformation in each issue to show the require- ments for states that offer credentials. - st ATE AND irTiONE NUMBER 'ARKANSAS W1482-9170 TITLE Massage Therapist, Master Massage Therapist, Instructor EDUCATION HOURS 500 in -class hours This information is updated on a regular basis to reflect changes to the requirements and additions of states. Even if your state is listed here, check With city or county officials for information about local require- ments and ordinances. WRITTEN OR PRACTICAL EXAM Both TYPE OF CREDENTIAL License RENEWAL FEE $30/yr for MT $40/yr for MMT $45/yr for Inst NATIONAL CEIMFICATION EXAM USED No # UCENSED, CERTIFIED or REGISTERED approx. 1,123 CONNECTICUT 60-509-7566 (iELAWARE t3.02-739-4522 x205 ?ft Massage Therapist Massage/Bodywork Therapist, Massage/Bodywork Technician 500 100 or 500 Written (NCETMB) None License Certification or License $100/year $222/two years Yes No LORJDA 904-488-6021 HAWAII '.:808-586-3000 IOWA 515-281-4422 LOUISIANA 504-658-8941 MAINE 207-624-8624 Massage Therapist 500 Written License $100/two years Yes Massage Therapist, Massage Apprentice 570 Written License or massage apprentice permit $120/two years (for license) No Massage Therapist 500 (graduation requirod) Written (NCETMB) License $100/two years Yes Massage Therapist 500 Written and oral License $50/year Yes Massagc Therapist or Massage Practitioner (No education required for Practitioners) NEBRASKA 402-471-2117 Massage Therapist Pass NCE or graduate from approved school 1,000 Written Written Certification for therapists; registration for practitioners License $100/year $302/two years Yes Yes (only for written exam) Yes (only for written exam) Ycs NEW HAMPSHIRE 603-271-4592 NEW MEXICO 505-827-7013 NEWYORK 518-474-3817 or 518-474-3866 NORTH DAKOTA 701-225-3906 OHIO 614-466-3934 OREGON 503-731-4064 RHODE ISLAND 401-277-2827 Massage Practitioner Massage Therapist 750 Both License $50/two years Massage Therapist, Masseur or Masseuse Certified Massage Thempist Massage Therapist 650 in -class or 300 in -class plus 350 qualifying experience 605 500 600 Written (NCETMB + . jurisprudence exam) Written Both Written License License and registration Certificate of registration License $125/two years $50/three years $30/year $25/two years Licensed Massage Technician 330 Both License $100/two years Massage Therapist TENNESSEE 615-367-6393 TEXAS 512-834-6616 UTAH 801-530-6628 Massage Therapist MaaEe Therapist Massage Technician WASHINGTON 360-586-6351 WASHINGTON, D.C. — 202-244-2280 Map.e Practitioner 500 500 from state - accredited school 250 plus 50 as intern Graduate from approved program or apprenticeship, or NCE+100 lus A&P 500 from state approved school Massage Therapist 500 in-ciass hours - Written None Both Written Written (NCETMB) License License Registration License License Written License. $25/year $260/two years $40/year No No No No Ycs 1,412 71 12,232 2,742 843 515 418 certified therapists; 154 registered practitioners 450 821 2,000 4,264 120 1,615 2,816 425 NCE accepted ' $50/two years $65/year No May be sub- stituted for a portion of written exam NCE accepted To be determined 598 9,338 1,434 5,898 Yes 0 10 116 BUSINESS, PRACTICAL AND LEGAL INFO Contractual relationship. A contract can be oral or written. It is simply "an' change of promises in which each party agrees to do or give something of: to the other party. Once made, a contract is legally enforceable until it is en by the parties who made it. Written contracts are easier to enforce, because the exact terms of the a ment are on paper for all to see. Oral contracts can also be enforced, but specifics must be proven by testimony about the agreement. Simply opening a checking account involves making a contract. The bank agre .; to hold your money and give it to you or the people you write checks to, according to certain rules the bank establishes. You agree to pay a set fee per check writtan or keep a minimum monthly balance, and to pay prescribed penalties for writin checks that your account cannot cover. r5 As a massage therapist, contracts you are likely to enter into include agree ments to work for others or to have others work for you, rental agreements for: office space, contracts with the phone company for business phone service, and contracts for performance of services like printing, laundry and cleaning. ; State Laws Regulating Massage The following is an index to state regulation of massage as of January, 1995. In states that have governmental regulation of massage, this index lists their educational requirements, notes states that have adopted the National Certification Exam as their written exam, gives information about reciprocity, and gives the address and phone number for the licensing body. Additional requirements, such as health certificate, required fees, and continuing education requirements and not listed. For states that do not regulate massage but have had legislative activity, a summary is given of the action that has taken place in the legisla- tive arena. Information of this nature necessarily goes out of date, since legislation regarding massage is changing rapidly. Fortunately, there are sources you can turn to that will provide periodic updates to this information. For current information on massage laws that have been enacted, one resource is Massage Magazine, whichprints a summary of current li- censing laws toward the back of each issue. An- other source of current licensing information is any of the massage schools located in a state. In addition, most professional associations keep abreast of licensing laws nationwide and can pro- vide current information. For up-to-the-minute developments about at- tempts to create new laws, see Touch Therapy Times. Jack Thomas, the editor of Touch Therapy Times, co-authored the part of this chapter on leg- islative developments in the various states. Touch Therapy Times reports monthly on legislative and legal issues relating to massage nationwide and is the only source for accurate information on this :`• subject. Subscriptions are $25 per year from Touch a. Therapy Times, 13407 Tower Road, Thurmont, MD 21788-1407 (301) 271-4812. In states that regulate massage, information about reciprocity is noted in the listing. Reci- procity means that you may be able to become licensed in that state without a written exam if you are already licensed in another state. Gener- ally, the state you are moving to will admit you to practice by reciprocity only if the state you are moving from requires equivalent educational training. Sometimes a state will provide a list of other states it approves for purposes of reciprocity. More commonly, a state will consider requests for licensing by reciprocity on a case-by-case ba- sis. This means the second state will take a look at all your documents and the information they receive from the state where you are already li- censed. If your documents show your training matches their requirements, they will grant you a license. In states that adopt the National Certifica- tion Exam as their written exam, passing the Exam in any location will satisfy the written test requirement. In effect, that amounts to automatic reciprocity as to the written exam. However, other licensing requirements must also be met to qualify for a license, such as specific educational requirements. The current state licensing laws are summa- rized in a chart on page 122. The information in this section is meant to give fuller information about what is happening in individual states than can be contained in an explanatory chart. Sr. SHOULD KNOW ABOUT AND STATE REGULATION OF MASSAGE117 likansas jjeensing, 500 hours required rocity is on a case-by-case basis y . kansas Massage Board " Box34163 PO AR 72203 Little Rock, ' 501) 682-9170 of Californ Cties, 1400 K Street,the vernment, contact Sacramento, o, CA 95814ia 1,000 hours (6): Orange, San Clemente, Santa Paula, Thousand Oaks, Tustin, Vista 600 hours (3): Fontana, Rialto, San Bernardino 500 hours (4): Brea, Cupertino, Palm Desert, Seal Beach California 300 hours (1): Newport Beach omia does not have statewide massage regu- The California Coalition for Somatic 225 hours (1): Marina Vcti • acuces has distributed 25,000 copies of a sur- " as a preliminary step toward creating a con- 200 hours (42): Alhambra, Auburn, Bakersfield, �.. " senitis concerning state regulation of massage ChB Vista, is Lake Ca Camarillo, Carlsbad, Carson, and. bodywor Chula ear C Cudahy, Cypress, El s g practitioners Segundo, Glendale, Grover City, •l; Licensingo of massageygovernments. Hayward, Hercules, Highland, Imperial, Impe- nia is done only byfo nity and county g rial Beach, Kern County, Laguna Beach, Loma E1; State of California law (Chapter 6, sections Linda, Huntington Park, 510 authority to cities Los Alamitos, aid counties ntto r gu a) givesMarysville, Ontario, Orange and regulate massage. The law states placent�a,tgidgecrest, San. Bernardino what aspects t the practice1may and oy t be County, San Buenaventura, Santa Barbara, Sig- ;naylatod. Sectiont5ssag states that localmlaws nal Hill, Solano Beach, Torrance, Twentynine Sig - ;nay not restrict massage to same-sex massage Only. Palms, Union City; Ventura County, West Sac - Some southern California jurisdictions ex- ramento, Yuba County. massage laws. This is usually definedCeres, Dublin, e ript Holistic Health Practitioners from their Atwater, as someone 180 hours (7): d, Modesto, Turlock Merce with demonstrable training and experience in Livingston, Corona, Desert Hot Springs, massage. 100 hours (20): ='' Massage schools in California are regulated Dublin, El Dorado County, Escondido, Fresno, by Theo al Education for 1027 Postsecondary andh Gardena, Hollister, La Mesa, Livermore, Merced County, Monterey, Monterey County, Novato, flo Vocational cSacramento,Ck 958 10th.All Street, fourth Redlands, San Francisco, San provedolbythCCAS Council -offer a in schools 100 Palm Springs, by the Council"offer a minimum of 100 San Luis Obispo, Santa Monica. Leandro, ':. hours of instruction for their massage programs. Alameda,Burlingame, Colma, The following table -of municipal and county 70 hours (20): licensing requirements was compiled in 1991. Contra Costa County,City,Half Moon Daly While most of this information is still accurate, Bay, Lakewood, Manteca, Milpitas, Pacifica, it is the nature of such information that it slowly . Palo Alto, Portola Valley, Richmond, San Mateo goes out of date. Nonetheless, this table provides County; San Pablo, San Ramon, Santa. Clara, a useful picture of the diverse state of massage Santa Clara County, Saratoga, Selma. licensing in California. Aside from the educational requirements Any approved or recognized 'ool (37): Beaumont, Arroyo ' Grande, Encinitas,aumon listed below, mostars have some practicaltopc rice Adelanto,elot,Beverly Hills, Cloverdale, quirements for a person who wants to practice massage. For example, some towns prohibit Eureka, Foster City, Fullerton, Glendora, "outcall" massage, or house calls, and some regu- Healdsburg, Imperial County, Lemon Grove, Napa, Oceanside, Oxnard,Pacific late it eseparately and require a special outcall Millbrae, Pleasanton, Poway, Rancho Mirage, Sac- Themassage aicensn. San Bruno, San Diego County. amount charged for business or profes- ramento County, West from Simi anel mlicenses varies dollato tremendouslyovetwo thousand Valley, South Lake Tahoe, Stockton,Santee,CSimi na, dollars. fromHollywood, Westmoreland, Whittier. dollars. Some towns . require a business license West Holl cod, massaget professional"ult entertainment".credentials. Some Some pro regulate Bell buttdothe Burbank, as "adult prohibit meats (12): Anaheimement other require - the practice toof 'massage informationaltoabout Long Beach, For updated about local laws, in- Commerce, Manhattulver an Beach, tRiverside, Riv- ingquire at the city hall or county government build- Los Angeles, in the county seat. If you cannot locate a city erside County, Santa Fe Springs. 220 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA LOS ANGELES AREA '687• Contact the school for program information. ostaMesa, r, 74:04;29.. 073 HOURS OF TRAINING: 1,009 (609 plus 400 hours clini- cal SportsMassage internship) DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day and evening programs available COST: 85,160 FINANCIAL AID: payment plans YEAR FOUNDED: 1983 ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: COMTAA, approved for nursing CEU's PREPARATION FOR OUT-OF-STATE LICENSING EXAM: Washington GRADUATES months DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day, evening and weekend classes available COST: registration fee $75, each 100 -hour segment 8775 FINANCIAL AID: Pell grants YEAR FOUNDED: 1980 ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: ACCET GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 100 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS:The first 300 hours include history, theory and ethics of massage, hydrotherapy, nutrition, trigger points, professionalism, joint move- ment, injury care, introduction to holistic theory. Advanced programs include sports massage, clinical massage, externship, oriental health sys- tems, botanical modalities, acupressure, aroma- therapy, choreography, color modalities, geriatric massage, massage for the physically challenged, music modality, postural re-education, practition- er's well-being, reflexology, symptomatic assessment, visualization modality UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: Place- ment department is actively involved with the medi- cal community. Extemships are available with athletic teams. Programs offered: massage technician (100 hours), massage therapist (100 hours), advanced massage therapist (100 hours); sports massage therapist I (100 hours), sports massage therapist II (100 hours), clini- cal massage therapist I (100 hours), clinical massage therapist II (100 hours), massage practitioner (600 hours), myotherapist (700 hours), holistic health practitioner I (1,000 hours), holistic health practitio- ner II (1,200 hours), massage instructor (600 hours) CONTINUING EDUCATION: contact school PER YEAR (APPROX.): 20 every nine MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: sports kinesiology, functional muscle testing, conterstrain, PNF s stretches, sports pathology and psychology, imme- diate injury care, pre -event massage, post -event mas- sage, training and conditioning, restoration/ rehabilitation, pathology, nutrition, psychology and philosophy, hydrotherapy, acupressure, shiatsu, reflexology, Chinese and Russian techniques, reme- dial exercises, lymphatic drainage,Thai stretches, hy- giene, CPR/first aid, medical ethics, clinical practice, business practices and marketing UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: Graduates receive dual certificates as massage thera- pist and sports massage specialist. B3.)I.uCamino Capistrano SUite. a z r a o, A92675 an uan Ca istrano, CA, 4)240k774 HOURS OF TRAINING: 300 to 1,000 DURATION OF COURSE: 3 months to 12 months sts ollege' vd., suite 20 0025:'.,: HOURS OF TRAINING: 150 (all class hours) or 650 (566 class hours, 84 internship) DURATION OF COURSE: 150 -hour course 8 weeks (day : - + Saturday or evening + Saturday classes available); ) 650 -hour course adds 42 weeks, evenings COST: 150 -hours 81,525 including books; 650 -hours $5,575 including books YEAR FOUNDED: 1988 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: 150 -hour course includes hygiene, on-site, foot reflexology, herbology, nutrition, ' oscsports massage, business ethics and llation, deep tpr practice, CPR/firsissue therapy, t aid. The 650; hour course adds pathology, kinesiology, acupressure, 221 -Zen nen CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES AREA shuts`', internship, and advanced courses in business, deep tissue, oscillation herbology, and anatomy and physiology. ancin :Jude rapt', rove;. ;age,. sys •ma=�:, atric ged, ion lent, ,:-:. HOURS OF TRAINING: massage technician 120; mas- sage therapist 500 `DURATION OF COURSE: 120 -hour course 3 to 10 weeks depending on format COST: 100 hours 8885, additional 100 -hour segments $860;1,000 -hour program $5,325 YEAR FOUNDED: 1989 ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: CEU's, department of vocational rehabilitation nursingoved for habilitation GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 50 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: sports massage, stretch- ing, Touch for Health, acupressure, t'ai chi, aroma- therapy, shiatsu, Oriental herbology, Western herb- ology, iridology, geriatric massage, prenatal/postnatal massage, massage in chiropractic setting, massage in hospital setting, post-surgical massage, business/ad- ministration, advertising/marketing, supervised field work, clinical applications, CPR, cadaver tutorial UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM. 1 grams are u on d' ' nal trainings are advanced massage technician .` DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day, evening and weekend programs available _ P build the core 100 hour training. Cosi: 120 -hour course 81,035 including books and programs lace- iedi 1etic slabs supplies, YEAR FOUNDED: 1980 PREPARATION FOR OUT-OF-STATE re students LLICENSINGfosome EXAM: 500 -hour program may P P state licenses—contact school for specifics. GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 330 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: 120 -hour cursenc dies f- t'ai qi chuan, Esalen massage, body psychology, massage, joint mobilization, energy balancing. 500- hour ,,,course adds acupressure, advanced circulatory massage, anatomy and physiology, business and pro- fessional ethics, CPR/first aid, deep tissue, emotional dynamics attic body, human energy systems, hydro- therapy, hygiene, pathology, electives (see continuing education). UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: Ho- listic Qi to enhance body body/mindoach to practitionerf T'ai mechanics of •urs), ;sage • (100 .lith - >sage (600 • ealth duo - )urs) Ad itio 200 hours; massage therapist sports massage specs ty 500 or 1,000 hours; massage therapist hospital/ni 500 or 1,000 hours; massage therapist holistic racti- tioner 500 or 1,000 hours. ADVANCED PROGRAMS: 100, 600 and 1,000 -hour trainings in equine massage CONTINUING EDUCATION: Many elective courses may be taken as continuing education (566 (day .ble); sours Ludes tion, sage, 650- sure, #74 ADVANCED PROGRAMS: 1,000 -hour professional bodyworker program, polarity certification CONTINUING EDUCATION: acupressure 11, Chinese herbology, cranio -sacral therapy, lymphatic massage, internal organ and post-surgical interven- tion massage, polarity, pregnancy . reflexology, sports massage, trigger point therapy, tui na, aromatherapy, deep tissue HOURS OF TRAINING: Massage Therapist 150 DURATION OF COURSE: 12 weeks DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day and evening programs available COST: $1,082 (includes book) FINANCIAL AID: payment plan YEAR FOUNDED: 1979 GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.):210 and business MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: ethical, anSelf aspects of massage practice, hygiene, nutrition, care UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: flexible schedule, classes start monthly CONTINUING nctional hology, deep tissue work, UCATION:f sports massage, trigger HOURS OF TRAINING: 100, 200, 500, 1,000 DURATION OF COURSE: 1.00-h010 class 9 weeks; 1,000- hour program 15 to 18 months DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day, evening and weekend classes available CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES AREA - DESERT HOT SPRINGS points, advanced Swedish, acupressure, reflexology, Feldenkrais, Alexander, hydrotherapy, nutrition, aromatherapy, energywork, human relations, business for bodyworkers, massage movements, tests review Contact the school for program information. ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: approved for nursing CEU's MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: history, ethics, acupres- sure, acupressure facelift, body wraps, cellulite mas- sage, integral body balancing, all about headaches, structural kinesiology, energy systems, mind/body dynamics, deep tissue, CPR, aromatherapy, tui-na, sports massage, Thai massage, pregnancy massage, hospital massage, color therapy, on-site, polarity, reflexology, powder massage, manual lymphatic drainage, face reading, healing with charcoal, ear acu- reflex, nutrition, social psychology, hydrotherapy, business and marketing, health, hygiene CONTINUING EDUCATION: All courses may be taken on an individual basis as continuing education. DURATION OF COURSE: 3 to 7 months DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day and evening programs available COST: 104 hours $1,090; 150 hours $1,550; 200 hours $2,050 YEAR FOUNDED: 1983 ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: approved for nursing CEU's GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 120 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: shiatsu, anma, traditional. Chinese medicine theory, Do -in, CPR/first aid, ethics/ legal/business issues, pain and orthopedic evaluation, clinical study CONTINUING EDUCATION: Jin Shin Do acupressure, Sotai method for sports injuries, East meets West, Touch for Health, foot reflexology, Tuina Chinese massage, basics in nutritional metabolism, basic sports massage, Oriental philosophy, culture and history #77' Southern California's :06 £M sa sage 9980IndianaAve uite,7 a �s ivvverside CA 92t 03 a kt , (909) 353-012 HOURS OF TRAINING: 100 (massage technician); 250 (massage specialist); 500 (massage therapist); 1,000 (holistic health practitioner); 1,150 (massage instruc- tor) DURATION OF COURSE: 100 -hour course may be taken in 10 -day intensive format or 5 weekends. Other pro- grams are completed at the student's pace. DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day, evening and weekend classes are available COST: 100 hours $745; 250 hours $1,895; 500 hours $3,295; 1,000 hours $5,295 170 Sepulve herman Oal 318) '7`88 08 HOURS OF TRAINING: 150, 500, 1,000 DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day and evening programs available YEAR FOUNDED: 1990 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: 150 -hour course includes ethics, basic communication skills, history and business management, hygiene and nutrition, beginning movement, CPR, practice massage. 500 -hour course adds functional anatomy, kinesi- ology, Feldenkrais, fieldwork project, advanced com- munication skills, hydrotherapy, body reading, breath and toning, myofascial reorganization massage plus 102 hours of electives (acupressure, reflexology, con- nective tissue massage, Esalen, Alexander, sports mas- sage trigger point, nutrition, herbology, chakra massage, pathology) 1,000 -hour training adds fascial anatomy, myofascial reorganization, reichian core contact and craniosacral work. CONTINUING EDUCATION: contact school California, Desert Hot Springs #79 Banning School f' > 66 705E 6th Stree m ' Dem rt Hot Springs, CA=92240 w s : 20320._66 HOURS OF TRAINING: massage specialist 250 DURATION OF COURSE: 10 weeks COST: $1,770 (includes books) YEAR FOUNDED: 1989 p(1DUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 28 ssg,. onAIa11Es AND SUBJECTS: deep tissue massage, reflex- lymph e ex - lymph massage, hydrotherapy, sports massage, aurallunesiology, hygiene, ethics, massage theory, i �SuneSS NIQ • UNIQUE CURRICULUM: a Christian sscho l and the curriculum includes cdical missionary work. Banning is in a rural set - u4 in the mountains 13090 Pe r S Desert Hot S rings, CsA 92240 6 9X175 or (800) 279 3175y M OURS OF TRAINING: massage technician (M.tech) 100 massage therapist (M.Th) 250 acupressure therapist (AT) 120 "• holistic health practitioner (HHP) 250 M.Tech is a prerequisite for M.Th (total 350) • M.Tech, M.Th and AT are prerequisites for HHP (total 720) DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day, evening and weekend programs available COST: 100 hours 8600;500 -hour program $4,000 (con- sists of five segments which can be taken individually) YEAR FOUNDED: 1988 ACCREDITATION$/APPROVAL$: approved for nursing CEU's GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 40 to 50 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: 100 -hour program includes Esakn, body mechanics, . work, mind theory, legalities, guidelines energysettinup a suc- cessful practice UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: Class size limited to 12 ADVANCED PROGRAMS: The 500 -hour and 1,000 -hour advanced trainings are made up of modules which may be taken individually. These include advanced body therapy, personal body clearing, personal emo- tional clearing, personal mental/belief clearing, inte- gration, business practicumsupervise daspects practice, body -mind integration, p y ho sP rise of healing, practitioner development tools, nutrients in food and supplements, counseling , skills and practicum, research project CONTINUING EDUCATION: shiatsu, physical activity & support work for beginners, herbology, healing touch, sports massage, hypnotherapy, Thai massage, releas- ing the past DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day and weekend programs available COST: M.Tech $750; M.Th 81,485; AT $1,040; HHP $1,490 YEAR FOUNDED: 1991 GRADUATES PER YEAR. (APPROX.): 120 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: shiatsu, tui na, manual lymphatic drainage, aromatherapy, sports massage, deep tissue, polarity, reflexology, history and theory of massage, business and ethics, kinesiology, aromatherapy, communication skills, hydrotherapy, nutrition, holistic theory, advanced anatomy, massage clinic, sports events UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: Pro- gram is spa oriented and provides travel opportum- • ties, including study in China and Ironman in Hawaii. ADVANCED PROGRAMS: HHP program (see above) CONTINUING EDUCATION: contact school California, San Diego Area HOURS OF TRAINING: 100 Or 500 DURATION OF COURSE: 100 -hour course 3 -week in- tensive or 6 weeks; 500 -hour course requires approxi- mately one year HOURS OF TRAINING: 110 to 1,004 DURATION OF COURSE: 2 weeks to one year DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: evening classes only COST:110 hours $675, 1,000 hours $5,250 FINANCIAL AID: payment plans YEAR FOUNDED: 1988 GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 185 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: deep tissue, passive joint mobilization, structural release, sports massage, acu- pressure, advanced therapeutics, aesthetics, hypnosis, on-site, cranio -sacral, nutrition, polarity, reflexology, professional development, psychology, business man- agement, CPR/first aid, pathology, personal fitness training program ADVANCED PROGRAMS: The total curriculum is di- vided into five courses: massage technician (110 hours), massage science (250 hours), massage therapy 224 (250 hours), massage arts (250 hours) and personal fitness trainer (150 hours). Each course may be taken individually as advanced training. ealmgI-lan 1064'1; ali LT ma y Center?^ Y\ 1-9)1424 of Ho hc° HOURS OF TRAINING: 100, 500, 1,000 DURATION OF COURSE: 100 hours 3 to 13 weeks; other courses proportionally longer DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day, evening and weekend courses available CosT: 100 hours $420 ($380 prepaid); additional courses individually priced MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: body mechanics, deep tissue manipulation, communication skills, Oriental healing techniques, shiatsu, tui na, hypnotherapy technician training, teacher training, drug and alco- hol recovery practicum, structural organization, neu- romuscular therapy, reflexology, subtle touch: transformational bodywork, herbal body wrap work- shop, on-site, the compassionate communication -a bridge to empathy, geriatric massage, cranio -sacral therapy, Touch for Health, herbology, yoga UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM:The 100 - hour program includes basic Swedish massage, anatomy and physiology. All other courses are offered individu- ally and counted toward advanced certifications nternaf oval P ofessional School o. ^c(ywork = .66Hornblend an Diego CA 92109h 619)21444142 or (800) 748 649 HOURS of TRAINING: 120 (level I), 270 (level I + II), 600 (level I + II + III), 1,000 (level I + II + III + IV) DURATION of COURSE: 120 hours 3 weeks or 12 weeks; 1,000 hours 12 to 18 months CosT: application fee $100; 120 hours $835, 270 hours 81,880, 600 hours S4,170, 1,000 hours 86,950 YEAR FOUNDED: 1977 ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: COMTAA, Depart- ment of Vocational Rehabilitation, approved for vet- erans' training, approved for nursing CEU's GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 200 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: Level I includes Esalen, deep tissue work, passive joint manipulation, muscle sculpting, body psychology, hygiene, ethics, business and legal issues. Level II adds clinical applications, deep tissue sculpting, oriental theory, personal assimilation. CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO AREA Level III (massage therapist) adds supervised prac- tice, anatomy and physiology, supervised clinical application, electives (such as sports massage, zone therapy, Alexander, Feldenkrais, Bartenieff funda- mentals, kinesiology, dance and movement therapy), creating a professional practice. Level IV (Holistic Health Practitioner) adds neuro- muscular therapy, supervised practice, three electives, psychotherapeutic techniques, supervised clinical application, directed study, creating your profes- sional practice, principles of structural integration, advanced technique internship UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: The curriculum integrates the student's body/mind and supports growth and change. The school is affiliated with Reidman Center in Tel Aviv, Israel, and some IPSB classes are offered in Montana, Amsterdam, Montreal and New Orleans. ADVANCED PROGRAMS: 600 to 1,600 additional hours are available in advanced specializations, such as Ori- ental massage, sports massage, Thai massage, somato- emotional integration, structural integration and neuromuscular therapy. CONTINUING EDUCATION: contact school HOURS OF TRAINING: 512 DURATION OF COURSE: 6 months to one year DAY/EVENING/WEEKEND: day, evening and intensive programs are available CosT: 84,325 plus 8340 supplies FINANCIAL AID: work-study is available YEAR FOUNDED: 1976 • • ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: COMTAA PREPARATION FOR OUT-OF-STATE LICENSING EXAM) preparation can be arranged for most states' exams; contact school for particulars ' GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 60 to 80 :.; ;u . MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: sports massage,•trt, point, body mechanics, myo-fascial release,' cranio sacral release, hydrotherapy, cryotherapy, amp= principles of ayurveda, use of energy for healing, preg- nancy massage, lymphatic drainage massage, palliator, massage for trauma, body/mind, business proccd for private practice, entrepreneurship UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OR CURRICULUM: program can also be coordinated with commttini college courses, using training at Mueller for hapd" on courses. ED listic practi ; yoN adds 488 hours of instruction to massage poner, OQ hours, tllerapst g y'` ` iram P ro e >. CONTINUING EDUCATION: Trager, foot reflexology, palpation, integrative neurology, Thai massage, intro- duction to ayurveda, Reiki, introduction to deep tis- - massage, on-site, acupressure, jin shin, deep tissue, healing breath, fine tuning es. "am Diego,: CA.92109 9 581 4429 HOURS OF TRAINING: 110, 500, 1,000 DURATION OF COURSE: 110 hours 2-weekintensive or 11 -.'weeks evenings/weekends;1,000 hours approx. 2 years COST: 110 hours $636 including books; 1,000 hours $5,200 FINANCIAL in: payment plan YEAR FOUNDED: 1984 ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: approved for veterans benefits and vocational rehabilitation, approved for nursing CEU's GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 250 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: 110 -hour massage tech- nician certification: zen-touch, shiatsu, nutritional counseling, hypnotherapy, movement, communica- tion, counseling, food preparation, herbology UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL. OR CURRICULUM: flexible schedule, blending of eastern and western modalities, school's location 3 blocks from Pacific ocean ADVANCED PROGRAMS: nutritional counselor, clinical massage therapist, fitness consultant, holistic health practitioner CONTINUING EDUCATION: contact school YEAR FOUNDED: 1975 ACCREDITATIONS/APPROVALS: COMTAA, ACCSCT GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 185 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: Required courses: movement, shiatsu, career development, communication skills, human sexuality, ethics, kinesiology, body centered therapy, integrative massage, neuromuscular therapy, myofascial release, nutrition, pathology, hydrotherapy, internship/field placement, clinic practicum. Electives include sports massage, reflexology, polarity, infant mas- sage, herbology, yoga, intermediate shiatsu and interme- diate Swedish massage UNIQUE ASPECTS OF SCHOOL OP. CURRICULUM: body/ mind emphasis ADVANCED PROGRAMS: hospital—based massage therapy CONTINUING EDUCATION: St. John neuromuscular therapy, Feldenkrais, manual lymphatic drainage, in- fant massage for instructors; contact school for other courses #87 Boulder School of Massage 1 nerapy ; s 285'39 F � Boulders 6'0 in 13,00):„44475j31:!2&09,1,44.-.1; HOURS OF TRAINING: 1,000 DURATION OF COURSE: days one year full-time; eve- nings 2 years COST: $7,290 FINANCIAL AID: Pell grants, Stafford, loans IN -CLASS HOURS: 160 DURATION OF COURSE: One four-hour evening class per week for 40 weeks plus 21 hours of study time each week COST: $2,800 includes books and supplies FINANCIAL AID: payment plan YEAR FOUNDED: 1982 GRADUATES PER YEAR (APPROX.): 30 MODALITIES AND SUBJECTS: sports massage, stress massage, infancy and pregnancy massage, foot reflexology, acupressure therapy, shiatsu, Reiki, Trager, applied kinesiology, Touch for Health, Rolfing, herbology/nutrition, CPR, hydrotherapy, how to start a business/business law, licensing laws and regulations HOURS OF TRAINING: 1,150 (including 159 hours of documented practice) Adsoof eso# 97.58 77 July 16, 1997 Honorable Mayor, and Members of the Regular Meeting Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 Subject: CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) Initiated by staff Purpose: Adopt resolution certifying compliance with CMP pursuant to California Government Code Section 65089 Recommendation: Adopt the attached resolution certifying compliance with Congestion Management Program. Background: In 1990 the electorate adopted Proposition 111. As a result every city must provide annual documentation that it is in compliance with the State mandated program which provides a link between development, transportation and air quality through trip reduction and transportation measures. Analysis: Using the mathematical formulas provided by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, staff has prepared the Local Implementation Report (LIR) which indicates that the City is in compliance with State requirements (see attached report). The City had a total of 10,531 credits; after subtracting the debits as result of a small amount of development in the year 96-97, a total of 10,141 remain. Thus, at this time no transportation or traffic improvement measures will be necessary. CONCUR Sol Blumenf ld Communi I Stephen "1:117 1, City Manager Michael Schubach, City Planner rector evelopment Attachments: Proposed Resolution Local Implementation Report cmplir 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, TN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 Whereas, the City Council held a public hearing on July 22, 1997 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), acting as the Congestion Management Program Agency for Los Angeles County adopted the Congestion Management Program in November 1995. The adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements. The adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP Local Implementation Report. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 1. The City has taken all of the following actions, and the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1996 CMP. The City has taken annual traffic counts for 1997 and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter. The City has adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the County Deficiency Plan. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of July, 1997 President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY cmp97 City of Hermosa Report Period: June 1, 1995 - May'31, 1995 CMP Local Implementation RepDate Prepared: ######### act: ber: Michael Schubach 318-0241 ANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANGELES. COUNTY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY 1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal [from Secti . . . 2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims [from Secti . . . Subtotal Current Credit . 3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (1994) Local Implementation Re . . . Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balan. ELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY EVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential Group Quarters VELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,0 0 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. 0 Freestanding Eating & Drink 4 VELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet 0 Dwelling Units 22 15 0 Lodging Industrial Office (less than 50,000 sq Office (50,000-299,999 sq.f 0 2 0 Debit Value x #### x #### x #### Debit Value x #### x #### x #### Debit Value x #### x #### x #### x #### (392) 2 (390) 10,531 10,141 Subtotal (150) (71) 0 Subtotal 0 0 (268) Subtotal 0 0 (32) 0 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or Medical Government Institutional/Educational LOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional ABLE ABLE vity Adjustments (Optional) - Complete m 0 0 0. 0 Daily shee Trips 0 0 Part 2 Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Point NT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued) `0 0 0 Subtotal 0 0 (521) 129 (392) PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) developme were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during th 2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period. ELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwellin ustment Subtotal Units 19 0 0 Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential Group Quarters VELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gro Square Fe Commercial (less than 300,0 0 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. 0 Freestanding Eating & Drink 0 VELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Lodging Industrial Office (less than 50,000 sq Office (50,000-299,999 sq.f Office (300, 000 sq.ft. or Medical Government Institutional/Educational PMENT ADJUSTMENTS Description (Attach add'l sheets ABLE ABLE 1000 Gro Fe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Square m Value x x x ustment Value x #### x #### x #### ustment Value Daily Tri mpact if necessar Value 0 x #### 0 x #### Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) 129 0 0 Subtotal 0 0 0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 0 0 129 July 2, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Status Report - Downtown Reinvestment Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file this report. Background: In 1994 the City changed downtown parking requirements and .negotiated a development cap with the Coastal Commission for 96,250 square feet of development utilizing existing surplus parking. Concurrent with these parking standards, the City changed Conditional Use Permit requirements and instituted other business friendly measures facilitating downtown development. Also concurrently, the City implemented a seismic retro -fit program requiring rehabilitation of 41 buildings in the downtown, prepared and implemented the Downtown Improvement Plan and commissioned traffic and circulation studies to assess parking and circulation demand for proposed development projects and prepared predevelopment studies to redevelop Lot "C" as a multi-level parking structure. Over the last three years the City has substantially implemented these programs with a new resort hotel under construction, a 400 car parking structure in design and over a dozen new businesses opening or expanding. All but 11 of the original 41 unreinforced masonry downtown buildings have been rehabilitated. Owners compelled to renovated buildings under the new seismic retro -fit ordinance, sought new tenants to share costs of making retro -fit improvements, and businesses looking for South Bay locations, located in downtown Hermosa where parking was not a major cost of development. The new parking and development standards, new requirements for seismic upgrading and new Lower Pier Avenue streetscape has changed the climate for reinvestment. Private Reinvestment Over the last 3 years the City has encouraged new private reinvestment resulting in the following: 12.2 million dollars' 1.2 million dollars 20.0 million dollars3 .4 million dollars • A dozen new business tenant improvements • Seismic retro -fit total • Hotel construction total • Lower Pier Avenue assessment Public Reinvestment Over the last 3 years the City has committed the • Lower Pier Avenue funding • Pier renovation funding • Parking structure funding :::..::::::....... following funding for public improvements: 1.0 million dollars4 4.0 million dollars5 3.3 million dollars 6 rti7..... Annual Financial Return to the City The hotel and parking structure are expected to • Hotel property tax • Transient Occupancy Tax • Hotel spin-off retail sales/sales tax • Hotel spin-off restaurant sales tax • Parking structure revenues* • Parkin structure retail sales tax • Other estimated annual sales tax revenues generate the following revenues annually: $ 40,0007 $260,0008 $ 11,6159 $ 8,54110 $300, 00011 $ 11,20012 .............................. .......... $ 50,000 *Does not include ground lease revenue from parking structure retail frontage Summary: The financial impacts of the revitalization program are impressive. The ratio of private to public to reinvestment is approximately 4 to 114. Revenues generated by this level investment will total approximately $600,000 annually. There is a high level of confidence in investing in the City and little ground level vacancy in the downtown. The City is now receiving inquiries for office development which can help satisfy the need for more downtown daytime users and generate additional sales .revenues. By the end of this year the first phase of the hotel will be complete and the City will have completed Phase One Pier renovations and the Pier Plaza. By the end of next year the 400 car parking structure will be in operation and the second Phase of the hotel will be complete. A new market for office and retail development is emerging downtown with substantial projects proposed to renovate and expand the Bijou Theater with new retail development. In addition to the above, according to hotel/convention industry standards, hotels generate approximately $51.00 per day on shopping and non-food items. This average suggests that a 96 room hotel will generate approximately $1.1 million dollars in annual shopping/non-food business activity and restaurant uses can expect up to $800,000 in additional annual restaurant sales based upon hotel related commercial activity. Comparing sales tax over the three year period, annual sales tax has increased by approximately 20% in the downtown since 1993. Therefore the scope and rate of redevelopment over this three year period is remarkable and is the best indicator of the changed climate for downtown reinvestment. mol Blumenf4ld, Director Community evelopment Department Concu Stephen City Mana .'- r Attachments: 1. Commercial projects list Notes 1. 12 new/expanded downtown businesses, 11 tenant improvements 2. $10.00 p/sq/ ft. 2100 x 2 = 4200 x $10.00 = $42,000 x 30 = $1.26 million 3. Value for land, rrl:, construction and parking structure contribution 4. City contribution 5. County and State funding 6. County funding 7. New assessed value for property 8. 10% of annual room rentals at average room rate of $200 p/night (rates vary -$187-$265) @ 65% occupancy. 9. Spin-off annual sales / $51 p/day shopping @ 96 rooms = $1,787,040 x 65% = $1,161,576 x .01 = $11,615 - Source L.A. Convention Bureau 10.Spin-off annual sales/$36 p/day restaurant @ 96 rooms = $1,261,440 x 65% = $ 819,936 x .01 = $ 8,199 Source L.A. Convention Bureau 11. Estimated annual revenue per L.A. County Agreement based upon 65% occupancy 12. Parking structure retail 7000 sq. ft. x $160 = $11,200,000 x .01 = $11,200 (Does not include ground lease value for development of site.) 13. Approximately 20% of estimated 96/97 downtown sales tax revenue (.20 x 269,146 = $53,829) 14. Approximately $4.00 of private funds have been invested for every $1.00 of public funds 1. 014eartrvitout, PLC_ 64;1 61Leknibb ern -Pa/ cone/ pitstc:opc- July 15, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Status of the Downtown Enhancement Commission Background: The Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission (DEC) was formed by the City Council in 1993, replacing the Board of Parking Place Commissioners which oversaw operation of the Vehicle Parking District (VPD). The DEC was established to expand the range of Commission activities to include promotion and economic revitalization of the entire downtown area. This expanded role included the planning and implementation of physical enhancements within the district (The Downtown Improvement Project); supporting businesses in the downtown through various promotional activities; and to provide policydirection for the downtown to benefit businesses, including direction on the parking in -lieu fee program. Since its inception, the DEC has played an integral role in the formulation of plans for improving the physical appearance of downtown. Throughout the design and implementation of the DIP the Commission served as a sounding board for business related concerns, and a consensus builder helping to obtain community support for the project. Additionally, the Commission has promoted downtown business development through its recommendations regarding relaxed parking requirements, parking in -lieu fees, and general support and advocacy of new development activity. Analysis: The DEC has successfully completed its original and primary mandate by spearheading the physical enhancement of Pier Avenue. While further steps remain to implement enhancements to upper Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, the remaining issues relate to construction/contracting and financing which are primarily City Council decisions. The tasks of promotion and consensus building relating to these projects have been completed. Another task envisioned for the DEC, that of promotion and business support including the provision of seed money for special events, such as FirstNight , St. Patrick's Day Parade, and the Film Festival, have been achieved. However, due to limited resources (budgeting decision of Council relating to the priority of completing the DIP) some of the broader promotional objectives were not achieved. Many of the promotional activities may actually be more effectively carried out by the private sector than a public commission. With respect to business advocacy the Community Development Department and all City Staff have taken on a new, more business friendly approach, as evidenced by the scope of reinvestment in the downtown over the last three years. This day-to-day interaction and support has minimized 1 the need for Commission involvement in this area. Staff time and resources are also constrained due to the pace of development activity, and the project management style of operation which has been used to manage downtown revitalization (i.e. Hotel, Parking Structure, Bijou, etc.). Recommendation: In light of the scope of positive changes in the downtown, the City Council may wish to consider whether the DEC has acomplished it's primary objectives. The terms of three of the Commissioners will expire in Septermber and now may be the appropriate time to consider whether the private sector should take over the remaining promotional responsibilities of the Commission. Sol Blumenfe Community D rector velopment Department Stephen R. City Manager f /b95/cd/dec 2 July 17, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 17, 1997 LAX MASTER PLAN Recommendation: Adopt resolution and authorize Mayor to execute letter outlining the City's concerns about the proposed expansion of the airport. Background: The Airport Department has been working on a program to expand LAX. Four major alternatives for the expansion are being considered. LAX has held a series of meetings to get comments and concerns expressed so they can be included in the evaluation of the four alternatives in the EIR process which will start next month. Comments must be received by the end of July to be included and evaluated. The Draft EIR will then be prepared, circulated and public comment invited on the proposal. The Draft EIR will most likely narrow down the choices. The resolution and letter will ensure that the City Council will have a continuing voice in the process. esp ctfully submitted, Step e Burrell City Manager 10a RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DEMANDING FUNDS TO MITIGATE THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS LAX HAS ON THE CITY AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION WHEREAS, the City of Los . Angeles Department of Airports is developing a Master Plan for LAX to guide the development and operation of the airport through the year 2015; and, WHEREAS, the impacts of LAX on the SCAG region are substantial and multifaceted, including economic, safety, noise, crime, vehicular traffic, and air quality, to mention a few; and, WHEREAS, the impacts of safety, noise, crime, vehicular traffic and air quality on the South Bay region of SCAG and, in particular, the communities that adjoin LAX are often given secondary consideration by the City of Los Angeles and the Department of Airports in their desire to maximize the economic returns from LAX; and, WHEREAS, those communities that are not directly impacted by the negative operational aspects of LAX, including safety, noise, crime, vehicular traffic, and air quality, to mention a -few, are also concerned with these issues and want these concerns addressed and mitigated as part of the LAX master plan; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Hermosa Beach City Council demands that the LAX master plan provide specific actions and funding to mitigate the current and future negative operational impacts of LAX on the SCAG region and specifically on those communities that are impacted by safety, noise, crime, vehicular traffic and air quality issues. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolution of said City; and, shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of July,1997. PRESIDENT, of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California Al !LEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney Fpm: Robert Benz To: Steve Burrell Date: 7116197 lime: 5:44:22 PM Page 3 of 3 JUL-16-97 WED 05:31 PM CLUD.SUSHI STATIC OV CALIFORNIA 11'MENT OF AAI.COIIOI�XC I{I.1voIeF oF INVESTIGATION L_I(:t„NSEE CLUB SUSHI, INC. DBA Club Sushi ADDRESS 120(1 Hermosa Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 INVESTIGATORS Yee #534 and Hirata #592 BEVERAGE CONTROL 310 540 9480 P.02 �nrdfias eta LICENSE NUMBER 47-313717 (Interim) DATE OF REPORT 06/23/97 DATE OF INVESTIGATION 06/20/97 OFFICE OF ORIGIN Inglewood District Office REFERENCE ABC 61 TYPE OF INVESTIGATION 23804 B&P 1. SI MM•IAfY t)I XNCXAYrNT 2. PERSONS INVOLVED 3. EVIDENCE -EXHIBITS 4. NARRATIVE REPORT 5. PRENIISI;S 5kk:1't:II SUMMARY OF INCIDENT: On June 20, 1997 at approximately 2335 hrs., Department Investigators arrived at the above mentioned premises to a violation of the licensees conditions. Investigators noticed that the entertainment provided was audible beyond the licensed premises, which is a violation of condition #7. Department Investigators ilk() observed several patrons dancing on the premises, which is a violation of the licensees' condition t5. PERSQNS INVOLVED: MC CyOLGA.N, Shane, Co -licensee .vale White, DOB: 1-1-60, age: 37 years old, 5'9", 195 lbs., brown hair, brown eyes, CDL# 0318562 SS#027-54-1158. Rc'ides at 912 9th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. MCCOLGAN, Scott, Manager 2,1ale White, 518", 175 lbs., brown hair, brown eyes. DEPARTjVIENT OF QRZ OIIOLIC BEVEIRAAGE CONTROL One Manchester Blvd, P.O. Box 6500, Inglewood, Ca 90306 Tel.: (310) 412-6311 a. h. F, iixata #592, Investigator* * to be subpoenaed in event of a hearing EVJDENCE/EXIIIBJTS: E. Yee #534, Investigator * 1. Two (2) certified copies of the Petition for Conditional License dated July 7, 1996. 2. One (1) certified copy of ABC 257 dated 11/30/95. 3. One (1) certified copy of ABC 253 dated 09/27/95_ 11 Via: E om: Robert Benz To: Steve Burrell Date: 7116197 Time: 5:44:22 PM Page 2 of 3 JUL-16-97 WED 05:31 PM CLUE.SUSHI 47-•123456 (.'lith inc. • • 47- i13717 Page ' 310 540 9480 P.01 NARRATIVE. REPORT: On June 20, 1997 at approximately 2335 hours, Investigator Hirata and l (Yee) arrived at the above mentioned location, We went to the location to investigate a possible violation of the licensees' conditions_ This was pursuant to a citizen's complaint that the premises was allowing dancing. As Investigator Hirata and I walked towards the premises, we heard music emitting from the premises. 1 stood on Pier Street approximately 25 feet south of the premises. and clearly heard the tnusic coming from the premises. Investigator Hirata walked westbound across Hermosa Avenue and stood in front of Citibank, From this: position. Investigator Hirata was approximately 80 feet west of the premises and could hear the music emitting from the premises. I checked neighboring businesses to assure that the music was in fact corning from the premises. This is a violation of the licensees' condition #7, which reads as follows: "Entertainment provided shall not be audible beyond the area under control of the licensee(s) as defined on the ABC -257 dated 11/30/95 and ABC -253 as dated 09/27/95." Upon entering the premises, I noticed approximately 100-125 patrons_ As Investigator Hirata and I walked thrnuu�h the premises, we noticed that patrons were dancing in various locations of the premises. I saw a ,.ttoup of four people dancing on the north end of the premises. I observed them dancing for approximately 10 minutes, It should be noted that an unidentified male busboy walked through this group and made no attempts to stop them from dancing. Investigator Hirata observed 8 patrons dancing in the center of the premises. Investigator Hirata observed this group dancing for approximately 5 minutes. This is a violation of the licensees' condition # > which reads as follows: "There will be no dancing allowed on the premises." At this point, Investigator Hirata and l net in the premises and discussed the violations we had observed, Investigator Hirata left the premises while 1 attempted to locate the manager or licensee. 1 walked toward the front entrance and told an unidentified doorman that I needed to speak with the manager. While standing in theAoorway, l was contacted Shane McColgan, the co -licensee. I informed him of the violation' l had observed. I presented McColgan with a copy of the conditions. McColgan and T walked ehroug=h the premises and I pointed out several patrons that were dancing. lvlcColgan acknowledged dancing was takine place. McColgan stated that the premises is a bona -fide eating place but when they start to play music people begin dancing. He further mentioned that they are very strict on dancing and that there is not a designated dance floor. I informed him that dancing is not allowed at all. I also informed McColgan of the fact that the entertainment was audible beyond the licensed premises and he stated he would close the doors and window. McColgan understood the violations. Scott McColgan was also present during my conversation with Shane McColgan. Scott McColgan was the on - duty manager at the time the violations occurred. He stated people would not take hint seriously when he asked them to stop dancing. I infortned Shane McColgan that the Department will contact him regarding the violations. I left the premises at approximately 0010 hrs. Ed Yee #534( Investigator Eric Hirata #592 Investigator o'l (o Date JUL-23-1997 12:35 RICHARDS, WATSON LA#2 213 626 0079 P.02/02 City of Hermosa Beach • Closed Session Report (Government Code § 54957.1) Date of Closed Session: J u('-1 Z 2 19 97 ❑ G.C. § 54956.$ Real Property Negotiations ❑ Final Approval of Agreement Substance of Agreement: O G.C. § 5495&.9 Litigation: (a) Pending/(b)(1) Significant Exposure/(b)(2) Authorizing Session/(c) Initiating ❑ Defend Litigation ❑ Seek Appellate Review ❑ Refrain From Seeking Appellate Review O Amicus Participation ❑ Final Approval of Settlement Agreement or Acceptance of Settlement Offer Name of Case: Case No.: G ♦ ^ O S'Q.s�. Substance of Agreement; Initiate Litigation .-ie r'ue. �-r o., ( ,; &I -At Lc ik 0 G.C. § 54956.95 Claims Disposition Claimant: Substance of Claim: Amount: O G.C. § 54957 Threat to Security; Employee Appointment ❑ Appointment 0 Employment ❑ Accept Resignation © Discipline 0 Dismissal [Disclose at first meeting after exhaustion of administrative remedies) Title: Change in Compensation: 0 G.C. § 54957.6 Labor Negotiations ❑ Final Approval of Agreement Other Patty to Negotiation: Item Approved: Councilmember Present Absent BENZ 1 BOWLER i...../ EDGERTON `.., OAKES REWCZKY C....."" Voting Tally: Prepared By: Aye No Abstain L Title: L. 11 Arrruge4,f.LI 660908 elm 05E14808(0) TOTAL P.02 JUL-23-1997 12:21 RICHARDS, WATSON LA#2 213 626 0078 P.02/02 City of Hermosa Beach • Closed Session Report (Government Code § 54957.1) Date of Closed Session: —1 u('7 Z 2- 19 9 % O G.C. § 54956.8 Real Property Negotiations ❑ Final Approval of Agreement Substance of Agreement: ❑ G.C. § 54956.9 Litigation: (a) pending/(b)(1) Significant Exposure/(b)(2) Authorizing Session/(c) Initiating ❑ Defend Litigation ❑ Seek Appellate Review ❑ Refrain From Seeking Appellate Review ❑ Amicus Participation ❑ Final Approval of Settlement Agreement or Acceptance of Settlement Offer Name of Case: Case No.: -SA, It v- Substance of Agreement: Initiate Litigation N -It r ^ r; 4.4 l Ce & O G.C. § 54956.95 Claims Disposition CIaimant: Substance of Claim: Amount: ❑ G.C. § 54957 Threat to Security; Employee Appointment ❑ Appointment ❑ Employment ❑ Accept Resignation ❑ Discipline ❑ Dismissal [Disclose at first meeting after exhaustion of administrative remedies] Title: Change in Compensation: ❑ G.C. § 54957.6 Labor Negotiations ❑ Final Approval of Agreement Other Party to Negotiation: Item Approved: „.. Cou ncilmember Present Absent BENZ r✓ BOWLER C, EDGERTON `� OAKES J REVICZKY 4......"' Voting Tally: Prepared By: 1 - ``�-`� 1 5,_ Aye No Abstain 5 Title; C c -n /-r f T ogf4 E 860108 dm 0684808 (01 TOTAL P.02 JUL-23-1997 12:21 USER NO: 2513 RICHARDS, WATSON LA142 CONFIDENTIAL RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS1ON Attorneys at Law 333 South Hope Street - 38th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 626-8484 Fax: (213) 626-0078 213 626 0078 P.01/02 DATE: July 23, 1997 TO: Naoma Valdes City of Hermosa Beach RECEIVING TELECOPYING NO.: 310-372-6186 FROM: Michael Jenkins OUR FILE NO.: 10649.00001 TOTAL PAGES: (including this cover sheet.) 2 DOCUMENT: (If you have difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our service center at (213) 253-0420) REMARKS: Attention Fax Operator and Other Recipients This fax contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the intended recipient named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any copying of this fax or dissemination of it or its contents to anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this fax in error, please immediately notify US by telephone to arrange its return to us at our expense. Sent: date time by CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION MAY 1997 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT BUILDING 90 34 427 309 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL ELECTRIC 19 20 232 174 49 12 205 129 PLAN CHECK SEWER USE 14 17 131 159 1 3 18 9 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 31 27 296 247 PARKS & RECREATION 0 3 12 5 IN LIEU PARKING & REC 4 4 11 6 BOARD OF APPEALS SIGN REVIEW 0 0 0 2 -1 4 21 33 FIRE FLOW FEES 9 6 55 38 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 3 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN TOTALS 1 2 21 18 ................. 220 132 1432 1129 BUILDING $21,131.70 $23,285.93 $147,289.54 $111,167.45 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL ELECTRIC 649.40 3,107.45 15,453.60 13,940.05 1,910.90 969.65 17,603.05 PLAN CHECK SEWER USE 15,681.80 17,265.60 129,973.51 8,657.45 88,448.99 1,500.00 2,704.44 28, 891.59 15,558.22 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 1,367.10 1,174.50 12,975.30 10,741.00 PARKS & RECREATION 0 10,500.00 42,000.00 IN LIEU PARKING & REC. BOARD OF APPEALS SIGN REVIEW 20,792.00 20,792.00 36,178.00 17,500.00 27,688.00 0 0 0 176.20 347 1,840.65 FIRE FLOW FEES 9,750.00 7,651.50 44,777.00 325.50 2,801.50 24,796.00 LEGAL DETERMINATION ZONING APPEALS 0 0 1,363.03 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN TOTALS 33.00 65.00 686.00 $72,992.10 $87,863.07 $479,031.27 0 585.00 $322,209.16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF MAY, 1997 1 101 NEW SINGLE DWELLINGS 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 7 7 $1,920,871.00 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDING 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDING 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDING 6 213 NEW HOTEUMOTEL 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319. NEW CHURCH/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGE (PUBLIC) 12 322 NEW SERVICE SFR/REPAIR GARAGE 13 323 NEW HOSPITAUOTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14. 324 NEW OFFICE/BANK 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BLDG. 16 326 NEW SCHOOUOTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORE/OTHER MERCH BLDG. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BLDG. 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BLDG. 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOL 33 $302,991.00 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 4 $2,989,046.00 22 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION -SFR 4 $2,000 24 646 DEMO 2 SFR 25 647 DEMO 3-4 SFR 26 648 DEMO 5+ BLDG. 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BLDG. spa, demo TOTAL PERMITS: 49 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: $5,214,908.00 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL July 15, 1997 Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION MAY 1997 STAFF REPORT PREPARED RJ E.. APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 2 2 7 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 2 2 15 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 1 1 11 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 2 5 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 2 1 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 1 0 FINAL MAP 0 0 5 2 GENERAL PLAN'AMENDMENT 0 0 9 0 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 4 1 12 7 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 0 3 1 PARKING PLAN 0 0 2 1 SPECIAL STUDY 2 0 2 5 SUBDIVISION 0 0 1 0 TEXT AMENDMENT 3 2 10 28 TRANSIT 0 0 0 4 VARIANCE 2 0 5 40 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 3 2 MISCELLANEOUS 0 6 42 58 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 16 18 134 146 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP The following Activities were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. 3 :>'::THIS> ;:.:SENG....'r . MONI M::::>::: X.Tfi3..........LAS.. . ::..:::.::::::: .......... ......5. FY...................ATE........ D ..'I'LQ..p......E.. HERMOSA BEACH 1,050 802 11,266 9,305 REDONDO BEACH 5,414 5,065 57,826 57,593 SATELLITE 515 458 5,498 4,862 The following Activities were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. 3 Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council / Initiated by 1. Text Amendment to add therapeutic massage to commercial permitted use list/City Council. CONCUR: Sol Blumenf Community NOTED: 1k� Id, Director evelopment Department Stephen R. City Manager um/hi Respectfully submitted, Tracy Interim Administrative Aide f:\b95\trans\misc\activity CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION JUNE 1997 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT BUILDING 37 37 464 387 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 23 17 255 191 ELECTRIC 59 16 264 145 PLAN CHECK 15 16 146 175 SEWER USE 5 1 23 10 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 37 20 333 267 PARKS & RECREATION 1 1 13 6 IN LIEU PARKING & REC 3 2 14 8 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 2 SIGN REVIEW 2 4 23 37 FIRE FLOW FEES 5 5 60 43 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 3 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 1 1 22 19 TOTALS 188 120 1,620 1,299 BUILDING $18,116.21 $16,643.29 $165,405.75 $127,810.74 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 7,409.30 1,827.80 22,862.90 15,767.85 ELECTRIC 10,628.40 1,546.20 28,231.45 10,203.65 PLAN CHECK 13,344.80 18,154.40 143,318.31 106,603.39 SEWER USE 4,303.51 901.48 33,195.10 16,459.70 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 1,631.70 870 14,607 11,611 PARKS & RECREATION 3,500 3,500 45,500 21,000 IN LIEU PARKING & REC. 15,594 6,896 51,772 34,584 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 325.50 SIGN REVIEW 176.20 347 2,016.85 3,148.50 FIRE FLOW FEES 9,475 4,958.50 54,252 29,754.50 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 1,363.03 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 33 32.50 719 617.50 TOTALS $84,212.12 $55,677.17 $563,243.39 $378,277.83 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF JUNE, 1997 1 2 3 101 NEW SINGLE DWELLINGS 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 4 4 $1,051,342.68 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDING 1 2 535,553.04 4 5 6 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDING 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDING 213 NEW HOTEUMOTEL 7 8 214 318 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 10 11 31.9 NEW CHURCH/OTHER 320 321 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING NEW PARKING GARAGE (PUBLIC) 12 322 NEW SERVICE SFR/REPAIR GARAGE 13 14 15 16 323 NEW HOSPITAUOTHER INSTITUTIONAL 324 NEW OFFICE/BANK 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BLDG. 326 NEW SCHOOVOTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORE/OTHER MERCH BLDG. 18 19 20 21 328 329 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BLDG. NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BLDG. 22 434 437 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOL 27 101,691 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 2 5,000 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION -SFR 1 500 24 25 26 646 647 DEMO 2 SFR DEMO 3-4 SFR 648 DEMO 5+ BLDG. 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BLDG. spa, demo TOTAL PERMITS: 35 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: $1,694,086.72 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL July 16, 1997 Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION JUNE. 9997 STAFF REPORT PREPARED APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION IL#AST:FY TE:::::: 0 1 7 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 2 2 17 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 0 11 6' 2 0 7 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINAL MAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 7 2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 0 12 7 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PARKING PLAN 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 1 SPECIAL STUDY SUBDIVISION 0 1 2 6 0 0 1 0 TEXT AMENDMENT TRANSIT 2 0 12 28 0 0 0 4 VARIANCE 2 0 7 2 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 3 2 MISCELLANEOUS .4 8 46 66 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 14 12 148 156 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP :::::::........................:.::.......:..:::::::::.....................::.:.::::::::::::::::::::....... AHI....:::::::.::: fH::::....................:....::.::::::::::.::::::.........,...:.::._ ::....::. HERMOSA BEACH 912 1024 12178 10329 REDONDO BEACH 5871 5056 63697 62649 SATELLITE 470 456 5968 5318 The following Activities were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council / Initiated by 1. General Plan Amendment from CC to MD including vacation of alley rights-of-way and Zone Change from SPA7 to R-2, Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, Vesting Tentative Tract Map #52251 and Lot Line Adjustment, on the rear portion of 2 commercial parcels fronting on PCH (635 & 705 PCH) and including 3 lots on 6th St., for a 24 unit condo project taking access from 6th St., and Precise Development Plan to reconfigure the layout and increase the P.C.H. frontage of the existing lumber yard, at 635 & 705 PCH/709 - 723 6th St / Private. 2. General Plan redesignation of inconsistent industrial M-1 zoned parcels / City Council. CONCUR: Sol Blumen Id, [rector Community evelopment Department NOTED: Stephen R. City Manage Respectfully submitted, Administrative Aide f:\b95\trans\m i sc\activity July 15, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 22, 1997 Department of Community Resources Activity Report for June 1997 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of June. RECREATION PROGRAMMING Summer Recreation Class Registration. Resident summer camp registration was held on June 4 and class registration on June 10. Non-resident summer camp registration began on June 10 and class registration on June 17. There has been a good response for the Summer Blast Day. Camp Program. We have a current enrollment of 90 participants and growing. Our After Blast Day Camp is also filling up quickly and we expect a similar response. Some of the newest additions to our class section include: youth classes in dance and tumbling, basketball and pottery. New adult classes include ballet and dance fitness. We have also added youth and adult roller hockey camps at South Park. Slow Pitch Softball. The summer season is as popular as ever with over 20 teams registered. Teams play Sunday through Thursday nights in B, C, D and Coed divisions. Players stepped up to the plate on June 20 for the start of the eight week season. Chevron Surf Camp. This is one of our most popular programs and this summer we added six (6) new sessions to accommodate the demand from last year. The program began June 23 and is now completely full with 336 participants. SPECIAL EVENTS Youth Chess Tournament. Saturday, June 21. This event was held all day in the City Council Chambers. Over 20 players, grades K - 12, competed for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place in their division.. Over -the -Line. Saturday, June 28. We had great turn out for this event with 12 teams participating, most of them being novice. The winners in each division received a T-shirt. West Coast Artists Festival of Fine Art. June 28 - 29. This first time event was very successful with over 70 vendors. It was held on the Community Center lawn with an estimated crowd of 250 - 300 visitors each day. Some of the art work displayed included oil paintings, sculptures in all types of mediums, furniture, Crystal ware, ceramics and photography. 1 UPCOMING ACTIVITIES AND EVENTS Corky Bell's Sports Came. This weekly intensive camp teaches the fundamentals of basketball, soccer and baseball. Taught by former professional athlete Corky Bell, the camp is a wonderful opportunity for kids to enhance their sporting skills. Camp begins the week of August 18 and continues through September 5. Dance Camp. Dance camp provides youths, ages 5-13, the opportunity to learn the basics of jazz, ballet and hip-hop dance. Dawn Mack will be directing this program running the weeks of July 7th and August 4th. CBVA Beach Volleyball Tournament AAU Jr. Beach Volleyball Championship AAU Southern Pacific Championships Temecula Wine Tasting Tour AVP Pro -Beach Volleyball Tournament Hermosa Beach 90th Birthday Celebration Facility July 5-6 July 13 July 16 July 19 July 25-27 July 26 6/96 User Hours 6/97 User Hours Field 215 194 Theatre 174 85 Clark 176 0* Gym 141 155 Room 8 129 96 Room 10 59 121 Room 12 140 96 Rink 98 6 *Clark closed due to retrofit. DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This Month FY Last Fy Month Last Fy To Date To Date $41,316 $51,233 $423,859 $448,078 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 100% of the fiscal year is $423,859 or 99.2% of the projected figure of $427,120. Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 100% of the fiscal year is $494,893 or 89.7% of the budget FY 1996-97 appropriation of $560,995. 2 Community Resources Department June, 1997 Activity Report Concur: /'- Mary C R. ney Community Resources Director Stephen City Mana 3 Respectfully Submitted, can Clark Recreation Specialist Community Resources Dept. !--f;• The city' of Hermosa Beach is taking \ registrationthrough June 11 for the youth 1 roller hockey summer seSsion. All new plaYers must attend the evalua- tion and draftperiod Friday, June 13.. The _:.season• will begin June 21 and the registra- tion deadline is June'll at 5 p.m.•3" The registration fee is $75,-$65 with the resident discount. Register at the -Com- munity -Center,_710 Pier AVe.-For More:in- fOrdatiOri';'Call DariY1Kini.a.18:0280;: ; • . Registratigns. are currently being ac- cepted for the City' of Hermosa Beach's summer volleyball classeS at the Hermosa Beach pier. - - • 'This' sail:06"S- -ela:S-SeS begin Jtie23 • and 25, and run every Monday and Wed- nesday for six 'weeks. Each class meets once a week from 6 to 7:30 p.m. The cost is $30 for Hermosa Beach res- • idents and $32 for non-residents. Youth classeS. will start June 24, and . will pry every,Ttiesday toEsix weeks,frOtn .4.45 4.545 pm ';The Cbstlil the idttriea. • the adult classes: .For :more ...info rmation.;call Fillman .at 540-3615. The city is accepting I, fregistratiotiS at the. Hermosa Beach Com- 1, munity Center -at 710 Pier Ave. in Her- mosa Beach. -- H.I3. teen basketball The Hermosa Beach Community Center gym, 710 Pier Ave., is open to teens be- tween the ages of. 13 and 17 for drop-in basketball the second Friday of each month from7.:30 to p.m. All teens must provide a city waiver signed by a parent or guardian prior topar: the program. WaiVersTare available a the Community Center or Can be signed in person at the start of each ses7-, sion. The games are free to Hermosa resi- ':dents, $1 for non-residents. The upcoming program dates are June 13, July11 and - Aug: 8. -- For more inforination, call 318-0280. , - •7,-,••• ' • --- • " ' s - - ermosa youth chess -tourname city._of Hermosa -teach is hosting its annual youth chess tournament Satur- ,ber1115,Valley Drive. -The tournanient willtakeplacelion19:30 a.m:_to 3 p.m. Registration is now being taken at the CommunityCenter, 710 Pier Ave. The cost '6'$12-',6r-$iwith theresident 'tournament is 4Ound-robin formatand open to kindergarten -through._ '12thliraleIttidents." ' ' - - • Thedeadline to register is WedneidaY, :June 18, at 5p.rn. Registration will be '- taken at the tournament if space iS'aVail- - —able:For more information, call 318-0280: anhattan Open in SE (°'aci ermosa this weekend OK, so it's not in Manhattan Beach. But it's -close. . en, call it the Hermosa Beach Grand Slam, either way it -Call it the Manhattan Op volleyball . ust still means that pro tiLite/AVP Hermosa Bea heGrand Slam South Bay this be played J .The $300,000 Miller� ` starts I south.,of the Hermosa pier. this FridaylthroughSunday.:Tournarent play -Fnday�at 9 30 a.m:, Saturday at 9 a in and Sunday at 9.30 a.m. . ,The finals are scheduled for 2 p.m. Sunday. ' - •❑ will receive .„ :Admission is freew . Those ho bought tickets for the Manhattan Ope refunds. "�, -1volleyballfans to see their The tournament will provide:A great opp• ortunitY for hometown stars, -including Mike- Dodd, Mike , Scott A ny-others. akatubb Y , ten . Frohoff, Eric Fonoimoana, David Swatik; Cant' it man ioli: K i, hand al b am Johnson; Brian Lewis and all the other top players Jw it Loiola: Kacch Kcraly, Ad ; _� - - ... .... also compete: _: '' ": Local volleyball purists may want to head down:battlto the h other finents shot at 1or catch the annual qualifiec;.10 - Y da sof the Open know that the qualifier tournamc -.Locals-who ieinembec: the g ry Y --is the closest thing to the way things used to be. -11.1'; ::-.cash i"'�s - fI te_He .. e3C-,":41A., ;A :-':'. A' .1e rmosa B h Sister,': iciation, anon- :... City _Also=',:_�ns profit group; 'and the city�f =government ofMexica Hermosa will host a celebration he pit a i. 7uly 26.- ; During the week ofluI - Thllevening lebratiOn S tUidh , :,•-.f- dele y 22 through 29. • = :`i. ulh -an Y, rom Loreto f.students acid dy r ,.. niv.Loreto;including g ttaries �arY�of the :fQundirig.of Her moss and rhea of a fOursa ermosa:; moss's sister: cit visit:H g the mayor, will rt' ofaier_.;: , ;mo Recently a ui•'- ' . .:. Y 7-Loreto,-�BaJa;California ��� � Sa-students ;and theirgroup :of Her - .s Isle ; _and _ttie dedication of. o to chaperonsvisited oIdestv1e*iCon in d t ofdhe - o the - g betty an.of a student exchange . LLoreto ,; Cakfom,a§'in -`: Mahe cities. '.Z%e. pro- ' - .,. �vcr��. �i� j.,�iys..>>•;:. .Association and. � Sister •City - ,4 Hec-mbsa .was founded Jan. `: ),z -:."r '. th_ a city ofHe when.inc_ 0 1.4.:1907 participation in this dual s je osa pone _ > Heers b a .watio and passed b ' 2 Proceeds will benefit the He y one vote..wa O. ssed y area -Sister City Association. o Beach Loreto was dnela of the n Coco. 25,.1 697, - . Jean-callinformation, tai of, all of. at Beach 89 Dick at ty l . f the.. Californias by: the federal the Hermosa Beach Comm ` 072 or _, ,.; '318-0280. ;,i- _ unity Center at • m e ..,4„..,:.,,.. NZ 0.2.1.,:-4. . ; \ . e.: or rocor ..!,. . • by Will Shuck ,,.•:,...i. },f Lon.Monk, the: AVP's•chief operating With the threat of. a•lawsuit hovering,-.•..officer;'saidtourofficialsdecidedto'movet.. . the Association of Volleyball.Profession=..` to Hermosa.Beach last week rather•than::. els prepared for a tournament in Hermosa., . wait for the judge's decision.,..;,,..:••r:•:`• ::••,' Beach this weekend• in.:whit:h'' players; - We' Mere holding our •breath` to a will vie for the largest purseinthe•his-`` "certain extent‘up to.abour:10.•d s a `o tory of the'sport....,a:;.l .,'L `'" :: '•�,-:, A'wh'en we•decided we couldn'i *a t'a y' . • ;, Less than 24 hours before `the , first . longer,".•Monk said. "We owed it to .the :. serve' in the 5300,000. Hermosa .Beach.: fans, to the players and to the sponsors to:-. Grand Slam—a• hastily organized tourna:: make a .decision.". • : ment that essentially: takes the place of ' Hermsa Beach officials last week ap= the aborted Manhattan •Open—the.same • proved the move and welcomed the tour;. attorneys' who sued to block the vener• :nament..••.• ......,•....:;,• _,;,:.p,,_,,.,:,;-,.;.. able beach tradition said they might try::. "Obviously a lot oft energy .has be'en;; ••to stop the event in Hermosa'as-well. • ..' spent on the political.end; of; this,': said•F,x: y "We're working On it,"- Los • Angeles • .Mary Rooney; Herm'osa's directorof.com=i' •: 'attorney Curtis Horton said Wednesday.. munity.•resources;;>,'Biit, ;both';; the'AVP'k • We .have• not gone in for ,a;. temporary and ?thetcity- are;. experienced :with' put=s' restraining order yet, but that:is still a ting on a volleyball tournament;." `'a ^.. .b. , ,,,.' •':..? : .. rtit possibility." "•• • �• Crews•�began'•aetting up �:a',p'ortab.. Horton is co-cduncil;with;, attorney. , stadium :on the'' sand.south.:of the: piers; Frank Angel for the •South flay • Coastal • earlier h ' ' ' this. week::�Yx � v�.;r�,; at,'� , ,- ,... ., • ..:. Defense Alliance." Last' Friday• the. pair: "We are going full force'ahead in terms:' "•: Construction' workers put the finishing touches on a 4,000 -seat stadium on the beach south of the pier convinced a Los Angeles judge to halt the.., of putting on the':first,.leg of the.Miller this week for.the Hermosa Beach Grand Slam volleyball tournament Manhattan Open on the grounds. that Lite Grand Slamthts•:weekend"Monk�: . . ti , Manhattan Beach officials violated state said: The Grand;Slam. is a•four-part;. big That's due in Part' to the hasty planning,.'c; charge admission," he. said.. environmental law when, it granted. the;, money series that begins here; then'heads ; h•e.said,: as well as because of the Califor-;.:•!;�<But, Horton said Monk and the AVP AVP a contract for the event. Opposition to Chicago next?weekend;.•then-back;;to �nia Coastal Commission's ban on ticket "•could expect considerable resistance. "I to the event beganlast• year:when the Hermosa Beach july25.27 and finally.tof sales for•beach events::; ::';;;:.•`• 1.:=ix•Think the coastal commission has made AVP demanded the right; to. sell tickets•,' Orlando, Fla.,•'Aug:;28-21:'At. each': stop, -'"That's• a. financial. setback; and it's a `•its position clear on the issue of paid for the tournamhnt. players. will,,,compete';for:• $300;000•; in;•'-;setback•in terms;.pf the direction we're seating on a public bench," the attorney And though the final word in 'that legal' prize money;••',This is the largest purse In :; trying CO move the sport.. Ticket sales are'. said:•"We would argue on strengthening battle has yet to be heard, the AVP chose, the history,of;,the:sport, ;Monk;said;` ; :•;;;;'one''of'the'•elements that make it a profes : their position so that it's not only it's not to move this weekend's tournament two. • And •yet; because•;of: the •political and 'sional sport," Monk said. •..'.only during• the summer (when ticket miles south' to Hermosa Beach..: • • , legal .wrangling that,:: forced;' indefinite;::; :u. But' he said the association. still has sales are banned) but the seasons beyond City officials in Hermosa Beach:said'•. postponement of the Manhattan Open, hope' for'paid:seating• onCalifornia• ••'aswell.Certainly Donley and the Coastal they were expecting a.lawsuit Monday players will compete' for, the sport's big- beaches.. Defense Alliance will be involved,in that after City Attorney Michael Jenkins Was' gest purse in, a medium:size..4,000-seat "We're going -to bring to bear all the issue and advocating fqr a continuation contacted by attorneys ;fork the coastal• : stadium.. ,..:,•'" . , • .•• •..;•;; . •• r^,;.;•:,,,-; resources at our disposal to try and get •and a , strengthening of the- coastal alliance. No legal action had been filed "We're' building''a stadium Which is ' the California Coastal Commission to commission's policy." by Wednesday morning'• •'smaller than in•years past,' Monk said. change their minds on allowinn its to .• June 12, 1997 • Volley This weekend's tournament begins today'at 9 a:m. W.4 .66 teams`playing to, qualify for..18 open slots..On Friday, play resumes at 9:30 a.m., `when 'those 18. winning qualifiers will join 48 pre-quali :fied teams for. day -long "play that will winnow'the field down to 24 teams. Saturday play begins at 9 a.m. By the' -end of the day, there will be .only six' teams remaining. Beginning 9:30 a.m. Sunday, those six' teams " will be nar- rowed to the top two by 2 p.m. for the' finals. The final two teams:will compete, fnr the $60,000 first prize. ER -';i controversy ;at ans split on aid'seating tournament • by Thomas Weede • Barb Navarro came a long way to -see the 'Association- of Volleyball Profession- als (AYP) Hermosa Beach Grand Slam last weekend, traveling from Chicago for the event. As little as a week ago, she was looking forward to the second -row seats she and her friend bought ahead of time so that they could see the action up close. -But all that changed when she found out that the tournament no longer.. had re- served seating, and instead would be free to all comers. • - •"I think_it's pretty rotten,".Navarro said 'of the lack of paid seating. " -. 'Although she would be able to get -a re__ fund, Navarro said she preferred to have the paid seating. • "You get.your seats; you can leave whenever you want," she said. "Not only that, the people who pay are more 'serious - fans." ,But Navarro's view on paid seating was not shared by all at the event;;with fans expressing a mix of opinionsonthe con- •'-.troversy that has surrounded the AVP's tour stops in the South Bay. :' 1 Two: female fans from Hermosa, saying " that they had friends on the AVP and de- - scribing themselves as "loya[_fans":of the tour, lamented the efforts of the AVP to 'charge for seating. - "I don't think (the AVP. should charge) because it's all locals, said one of the women. -"Everyone knows each other ... I f (Please tiirii to Page l9) • (Continued from Page !1) - think it ruins the ;whole enjoyment of vo leyball if you're paying." • paid to go to the tournament if admission `_had been charged. Despite the contro- versy, the event appeared t6 go smoothly. Hermosa Police Chief Val Straser said ;thatthe event crowd did not cause disrup- tions:. - -..:::The lack of paid seating at the event "We didn't have any unusual calls," he as well as the fact that the tournamentwas;=::: said; `-`We had a lot of people downtown, -held in Hermosa last weekend = was;tfie`. ,but everybody was well-behaved." result of a combination of a ruling by:state >,'Pam Emerson with the Coastal Com - officials and.a. lawsuit fled by the South emission said that she attended the event -,Bay : Coastal Defense Alliaoce.(SBCDA).,5.and. said that the tournament did not seem The state Coastal Commission recently ::. `.`to be overwhelming the town." rejected the Ayr s request .to charge ad-:., 1"; :Em Beach Open: "erson added, however, that signs di - mission for its Manhattan Bea'taectingfans to remote parking lots at TRWtournament, and SBCDA's;lawsuit then : • `and:Mira Costa High School will need to blocked the longstanding tournament from L_: be -iinproved for the next AVP event in going forward in Manhattan.: The event -. Hermosa in July. The Coastal Commission moved to Hermosa last weekend':when; .',has:rejected paid seatin at that event as Hermosa city .officials agreed at the last well q minute to host the -tournament y'p °.;C,111 The name,m was .changed from _ _..._ ,_ ..,...-. :"Manhattan Open" to the "Hermosa Beach Grand Slam, Pete Simpson of Portland. said that it's` notthat big of a deal". if the AVP.wants to charge for seats,,buthis friendMike Klein,,;: also from Portland,disagreed think it's. -cool it's free,"_,Klein. "That way if you're walking on the beach .j you can check it 44t.• -• :Jeremie :Scott. of Hollywood. agreed, ! • :saying that he comes to: the 'tournament every. year and he enjoys the free: -..seating aspect of the events _ ,.) w r •• •'=4 ".I 'think it's great,"-.hesaid. ."It''s.the- Drily- professional sport you:can.see>for. ▪ free ..:*� But Joe PalompoofTorrance said that1 he didn't have a problem.with the AVP. -charging for .the• event if the,paid,seating-:: prevented a financial loss for the tour - -+ don't see -why they shouldn't be able _� _ ..t td charge if they;a goingaolose�tnoney;''_ he said. ' r ::.Fans generally said they would have '' • :134 - .e.,z,Ilermosa—Beaeh iiiiifc'.cidritii%,COnan, right, runs' to 'celebrate with partnt 4 , Dain Blanton after the pair's upset 15-13 victor in the finals of the AVP TrIsilno! , Balch Grand Slam last Sulidiy _(siti‘S1). : ;• • - _ •• ho ALT; kr: Haw .. • . Local u -an(1-comers s amavorites.- �eTrmo , y ` sa GrandSlam • : by Alfred C: Martino `Before. a raucous capacity crowd at .the pier in Hermosa Beach, the upstart team -of Canyon Ceman and Dain Blanton captured the $300,000 Miller Lite/ • _=: :'AVP Hermosa Beach Grand Slam event Sunday- af- ': ternoon, beating the top -seeded Kent Steffes and Jose •' Loiola in the championship game, 15-13. The victory • . reversed an earlier. loss in the winner's bracket finals at the hands of Steffes and Loiola. : Riveting action in the semifinals and champi- onship game capped what was an exciting day of vol- leyball, eclipsing. much of the controversy and legal ...wrangling that had plagued the.event and the AVP.in the weeks prior:':Originally scheduled as the annual. Manhattan_ Open,_ thee -event was moved to Hermosa Beach.because of_ a lawsuit over commercial use -of :.. the puhlic.beach.; ,- • ::Blanton and Ceman, .considered two of the best . young players on the tour,"chose .extraordinary timetime to win their first AVP tournament both as a team and individually..They will split. the $60,000 ;_ championship purse, while_Steffes and Loiola will• share $34,200, , • • . • :Though Steffes and Loiola had steamrolledito .th :championship game, winning five_ straight; matches, it was clear from the first srvc in (he final that Blanton and Ceman were well-prepared, mentally and physi rally`' "I've learned something from watching Kent for the. past1b.years and Jose for the past_season," :said - the 25 -year old Ceman,who played.his:high school . ball at nearby Mira Costa High School to Manhattan ' ,i • -- Beach . ...;.. :,z into overtime. A two-point margin would have given St fifes Loiola the vic .The two teams traded early leads before being tied tory !` :;%,- H tx ,ter'��' at six. Then Blanton and Ceman went on a 5 1 run to K `I wasthinking I had to hit an ace ore lose, said Ceman ,`I was feeling - Make the score 11-7, holding what was. the biggest ressure`I was nervous I won't lie toyou " � s' margin, of the game. With momentum .on their side, r Though he didn't getthe;ace, he and Blanton did cthe lead to 13 12 with they appeared to b•e. poised to close out the victory dust four seconds left; then tied the score at 13 as the eight minute time'clock "At 11-7, we were saying, `finish, finish,'" Ceinan� 1expired "Abruptly, momentum had swTung backfin their favor 2.` : recalled. „< a• r • �� r )n overtime, another timely,Blanton block:put me..team up by;o e, setting ,But Steffes and Lo_iola showed why, they- up ha re the fiinal point-1iie,game ended with Steffes hitting wide, giving Blanton won seven of_ thelast 10 AVPy tournaments and `areCeman the 15-13 vilctory and" sending the crowd ;tuna, g cheering frenzy _ •"arguably the best in the world, scoring six urian Blanton who`becomes the first;A ncanzAmencan to capture:;a profess swered points behind excellent blocks ;by the native == sional beachivolleyball title; rushed into the•stands to`celebrate with his fain-= Brazilian, Loiola . _ _ • .�; ily and supporters. ��'�;t::. ;y:�r'•.:t`� Down -13-11 with with just.30 seconds to go in regular • :;:A few minutes later; during the center -court awards ceremony,_Ceman, - tion, Blanton and Ceman were reeling, needing -des- _ overwhelmed with emotion, acknowledged his family; friends and the __.perately to cutithe lead to one before.the game went; (Please turn to Page 33) anyon Ceinari goes low fora ball in the final againstKent Steffes and _ ose Lotola while partner Dain Blanton looks on. s r photo byTamHauck)` Gid : Slam (Continued front Page 31) • standing -room -only crowd.. . "Thanks for making today one of the happiest of my Iifc," he said, fighting back tears. . `After offering his words of apprecia- tion. Blanton added simply, "It's unbeliev- able." nbelicv- able" - `` '"I'hey played a great final," Steffes ac- knowledged at a post -game press confer- ence. "We were in"position.(to win), we just didn't execute" ` • • _•, •With _a victory Oct Steffes-l..oiola it . • the championship game and an equally ex- citing I0-8 win again_ st the third-place team of Randy *Stoklos and Troy Tanner it the finals of the consolation bracket, batt Blanton and Ceman felt their time ha( come. • 'F '"You `hate" to -hear -the' term 'youn; guns' and then never win;' said Blanton. •::three-year pro. "Now, it's for real, win • ning the biggest tournament in the sport." "If I could've written a dream stop this would've been it," said Ceman, a He, e.mosa Beach:native. "I hope there's mot !col. this. to come," he,addcd with a *wic grin,-the'grin of a newly -crowned chan •=4 t. - 1• Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, JUNE 1997 July 15, 1997 City Council Meeting of July 22, 1997 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration Full Time Employees Part Ttne • oyesa e ,v 130 1 132 Finance Cashier • "" " "• • • • • • • " " "• " • " EON PAYMENTS • California Out of State Driveway Contractor • • • Annual Preferential " "titit Vehicle Licenses Issued • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••,••••....... ••• ••• • •••••••• • ••••• •••••• -,---,—,•-••••••••••••••• • ••• •••• • ••••••••••••••••--- ---•••-•••••••-••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••____.....,........... 1,782 3,029 25,823 35 0 3,903 • .................................. 43,271 0 • 221 299 Reyeue $5,2663j 34 12 11.4 215 248 3,736 5,984 289 *;• 2,281 43 102 4,983 1,852 NOTED: Stephen R. Burrel City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted:. Viki Copeland, Finance Director fl\b95\open\activty3.doc HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1997 JUNE 1997 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE TOTAL CALLS 90 59 513 429 FALSE ALARMS 0 4 0 38 MUTUAL AID 1 1 12 4 PARAMEDIC ASSISTS 66 49 352 247 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 3 6 23 27 COMMERCIAL FIRE 4 1 14 9 VEHICLE FIRE 2 1 9 8 HAZARDOUS MTLS. 1 1 18 22 OTHER 13 2 85 74 ESTIMATED FIRE LOSS $5,100. $1,000. $75,505. $102,520. PARAMEDIC STATISTICS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE Ism LAST YEAR TO DATE TOTAL RESPONSES 88 83 434 402 NO PATIENT/AID 4 7 26 34 MEDICAL 41 27 210 197 TRAUMA 43 49 193 172 auto accident 14 14 65 56 assault 11 8 29 38 jail call 7 4 23 17 hospital contracts 26 23 162 164 trauma center 3 2 13 10 trans. by pvt. amb. 0 -',1••••••111•13iY1"' : •""•11111--"'••••••••• 6 '�::� ::. �. �:::.: �. �:11'il::: �:1 {1.:� :•iiiiii: •: •: -: w::::: --.:i!:�Y fvi:-iiii;: x:: ::•::. �: :w::: 1 1 1 1 X 1 3• 1 il" "•.••••. •..• 11 •1: } X1'1{:{""""""'(::•il• :• THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION ORIGINAL INSPECTION COMMERCIAL 81 26 387 147 ASSEMBLY 0 0 2 1 INSTITUTIONS 0 0 2 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 1 1 APARTMENTS 31 27 227 161 RE -INSPECTION COMMERCIAL 38 10 115 112 ASSEMBLY 0 0 0 2 INSTITUTUINS 0 0 0 2 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 1 0 APARTMENTS 17 110 108 HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997 JUNE 1997 INVOICE BILLINGS FOR AMBULANCE SERVICE THIS MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE AMOUNT BILLED THIS MONTH AMOUNT BILLED F/Y TO DATE INVOICE BILLINGS RESIDENTS 33 287 $7,738.70 $66,829.00 NON-RESIDENTS 23 202 $10,738.70 $94,044.70 TOTAL 51 433 $18,477.40 $160,873.70 jc/revmonthIrpt Noted: Respectfully Submitted: STEVE B LL, CITY MANAGER PETE BONANO, FIRE CHIEF 2 July 14, 1997 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 22, 1997 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT Activity Report - June,1997 STATISTICS Worker Comp Claims CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE Claims opened 4 4 41 54 Claims closed 2 3 34 37 Total open 91 80 Current Employee 43 34 Active Cases 4 5 Lost time (hours) Safety 124 688 2802 4083 Non -Safety 206 20 1387 313 Liability Claims Claims opened 1 0 21 25 Claims closed 0 1 22 50 Total open 15 15 Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety Non -safety Employee Turnover Safety Non -safety Res ctfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager ACT2 0 0 0 0 2 1 , HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Monthy Activity Report for Calendar Year 1997 JUNE, 1997 THIS THIS MONTH YEAR LAST YEAR MONTH ONE YEAR AGO TO DATE TO DATE OFFENSES REPORTED MURDER 0 0 0 0 RAPE 0 1 3 2 ROBBERY 1 1 12 10 ASSAULT 13 7 59 56 Burglaries(Vehicle) 5 10 25 34 Burglaries(Residential) 0 12 30 89 Burglaries(Commercial) 9 3 27 17 BURGLARY(Total) 14 25 82 140 LARCENY 58 47 261 222 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 6 4 54 72 DUI 28 17 143 74 ALL OTHER OFFENSES 270 242 1,602 1,376 PERSONS ARRESTED ADULTS 78 48 432 336 JUVENILES 3 3 14 24 CRIMINAL CITATIONS 78 97 385 400 BICYCLE/SKATEBOARD CITES 2 0 4 4 TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal 0 0 1 1 Injury 8 12 33 39 Property Damage Only 14 17 116 114 CITATIONS Traffic 264 303 1,574 1,443 Parking 1 3 19 20 DISTURBANCE CALLS 284 387 1,685 1,570 POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE 2,187 2,390 12,888 10,336 , PARKING ENFORCEMENT Monthly Activity Report for Calendar Year 1997 JUNE, 1997 THIS MONTH YEAR TO LAST YEAR THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO DATE TO DATE PARKING CITATIONS ISSUED 5500 7344 28027 31869 VEHICLE IMPOUNDS 19 38 239 88 VEHICLE BOOTS 6 2 40 7 NC CITATIONS 17 13 80 78 TOTAL ANIMAL PICK UPS 45 42 218 245 OF THESE #RETURNED TO OWNER 11 6 39 43 #TAKEN TO SHELTER 30 22 53 88 #INJURED, TAKEN TO VET 0 0 5 3 #DECEASED 24 14 131 111 #RETURNED TO WILD 6 0 16 17 PARKING CALLS FOR SERVICE 163 159 830 853 ANIMAL CALLS FOR SERVICE 77 77 385 434 Noted: pectful y Submitted / e Steve Buren A,e Val Strase e City Manager Chief of Po ' e Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 14, 1997 Regular Meeting of June 22, 1997 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1997 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager, this includes engineering and management of Capital Improvements Projects. PERMITS ISSUED Type of Permit Current Month 96 - 97 To Date Last FY Month 95 - 96 To Date Sewer Demolition 0 6 0 5 Sewer Lateral 1 12 2 12 Street Excavation 12 42 4 36 Utility Companies Only 8 184 15 109 Dumpster/Misc. 6 30 1 42 Banner Permits 3 29 3 22 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 93-145 Utility Undergrounding CIP 96-155 Left Turn Signal At Aviation/Prospect CIP 94-160 Downtown Improvement Project CIP 93-302 NPDES Storm Water Management 1 CIP 92-408 Sanitary Sewer Improvement City-wide CIP 96-506 Park Renovation (Clark Building Seismic Retrofit) CIP 95-620 Hermosa Beach Pier Renovation CIP 95-622 City Hall ADA Requirements CIP 96-624 Parking Structure (Lot C) MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: • Parks/Medians • Street Maintenance/Building Maintenance • Sewers/Storm Drains • Street Lighting • Traffic Safety • Equipment Service Parks/Medians Division: Irrigation repairs at Noble, South and Valley Parks. Final installation of new irrigation at Greenwood Park. Install new play equipment at Valley Park. Start City-wide tree trimming. Assist in Sand Hill Park renovation. Backfill South Park wall. Prepare ballfield for Little League tournament. Repair South Park roller hockey rink. Ongoing median maintenance. Street Maintenance/Building Maintenance Division: Update marquee at Community Center. Graffiti removal at the Pier. Street repairs at Owosso and Ava. Install new meter poles and add sidewalk at Greenwood Park. Misc. building maintenance repairs at the Community Center. Assist in sewer emergency cleanup. Second Street sidewalk repairs. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Remove and repaint volleyball poles. Repair plumbing at city Hall and Police Dept. Assist street maintenance crew with concrete work. Repair sewer laterals. Administrate ongoing sewer contractor. Street Lighting Division: Remove old gas line at South Park. Repair lights at Base III and Police Dept. Assist with Pier Avenue project. Start scoreboard installation. Work on fire alarm at Community Center. Assist street maintenance crew. Repair the Pier electrical/lights. Install new street banners. Repair Police Dept. door. City-wide street lighting repairs. Traffic Safety Division: Replace signs at 10th, 1 lth and Strand. Rebuild Lifeguard's parking. Curb painting City-wide with service request. Make new stencils. Resign the Pier for closure. Install temporary trash cans on Lower Pier Avenue. Replace damaged stop signs. Install new hydrant buttons. Install new signs on the Strand. Graffiti removal. Equipment Service Division: Ongoing equipment and vehicle maintenance and repair. 2 Graffiti Removal: FY 95-96 JULY 1995 AUGUST 1995 SEPTEMBER 1995 OCTOBER 1995 NOVEMBER 1995 DECEMBER 1995 JANUARY 1996 FEBRUARY 1996 MARCH 1996 APRIL 1996 MAY 1996 JUNE 1996 YTD TOTAL: Respectfully submitted: Amy An Irani Director of Public Works 0.50 Hour 27.50 Hours 12.00 Hours 21.00 Hours 42.00 Hours 3.00 Hours 37.00 Hours 9.25 Hours 18.00 Hours 60.50 Hours 29.50 Hours 15.50 Hours 275.75 Hours 3 FY 96-97 JULY 1996 AUGUST 1996 SEPTEMBER 1996 OCTOBER 1996 NOVEMBER 1996 DECEMBER 1996 JANUARY 1997 FEBRUARY 1997 MARCH 1997 APRIL 1997 MAY 1997 JUNE 1997 YTD TOTAL: Noted: Stephe B ell City M. pager 12.00 Hours 11.00 Hours 43.50 Hours 25.50 Hours 19.00 Hours 25.00 Hours 22.50 Hours 22.50 Hours 26.00 Hours 93.50 Hours 29.00 Hours 27.50 Hours 357.00 Hours bc/PWccitem/moact ". 02 • ti • • • 4 / res NOTESe t) Il Y ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON PRE 9saSED ON AN ASSURED OATUN. e) THIS MAP ONLY SHOWS EASEMENT$ IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESCITIOTTON9 FURNtSHEO. 3) FURTHER INFORMATION MAY DE .FOUND ON THE CORNER RECORD OR RECORD OF SURVEY FTLEA UITH 1i- . COONTY S4.IRvEYOR AS REQUIRED. f 7/ fl • SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAV CORRECTt4Y REPRESENTS DT'RECTtON IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUfVEYOR' S I,.,�THE REQUEST a 5URVEY MAGE SY ME OR UNSER MY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAND. OF `/,.;''_' NORMAN S GREEN LS 99014 OATS OF SURVEY+ / ;1' PRINTED MAY 2 0 1997 RECEIVED X 2 1 1997 PLANNING DEPT. �!:2T 4,2; i7✓v i" j} f k g!..' /1 a BIC SORVEYING, 10.0 ei' Y. ',p .M . C,fMt!�y("f1p11-YNvi'A.S 1145. TE -SIA BLVD . SOTE 202 MANHATTAN 3, CA 90266 (3; 3.79--"'64 to I 0t', PARTY xx MY�rL� �V��U� 0 rtl It t g f) II�yI 177 It -1 iL7T- £9 J rzil t�G�• to 'WA N r — ✓rli Ta �iNE --- 's ----t r vv gib II1 ROOF PLAN SCALE : 1/8" = 1'M' .-,rce-T 29 f r -o-1 II F:,l /2T. 'Lvir-16 TM t.1tMJ kWV Et.44.e G f 1 r4 e ,`.C, 0 Io. o' �o3 5 150-: iet1r ,pt'V'1T1•ah _7 7+jt 11 F'.T r 4C Xi /mo • o e Ec SITE PLAN; SCALE : 1/8 -1 0 RECEIVED a 9 0997 D DEPT. • Stamp Revisions 0 0 W U Y WF -4 W TOYSARO ARCHITECTURE 1001 Sixth Street No. 100 Manhattan Beach, Ca i ia 90266 Tel: 31.0.318.8089 Fax: 310.318.9400 PROPERTY OWNER -I+b/I 9-efi2-1/JAM au49-t *14.71&'•x(0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. r& ,J Thy %' jz1' r't) wo ,,fit f Ayr! p at -1 TO 414 JAt z..,-11 NG1 c't4 41W'1' ri.uh ort'sI6 t -i f r't-j I x LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lei 1s} -117-ACT r4 10*I Met 1-7/14,V O OCCUPANCY, ZONING, AND AREA DISTRICT OGd.Ueoa4-y: pi Kl iiP UMITLJ: I ogit-lit-414 rJ4or, apt : 2+ Gar 4,1,zu4-TsoN -fl : ,/• N' pts-tu,t-r. Fav : t+.0 .)(1% -iii NO L.' : t7urt.EX SHEET INDEX I V& -k.- -t---u t -t-- 2_ • It -r I4 I h---L-J-4-1 ,6-' -no h .VICO rt2C+t) .l.rx21c. ouch..-, A 4 oieoroe, ` Is jc- rL 4.,.. rteoarOet L ,/ss--t-Iot4 fr, CO "or L- ,A.. -t- I C) }1e 4..-7 G xGrl W AREA CALCULATIONS A'ri'AL Lor r...poec,a�s = Iit. ALL; IS 1-&-r Get o 0 h. ox.o:.. = tow -2.7a Leif. f tie I Aar! T i -rOt'At..• rn ;A,a T r �;%)5 ez.v 'hied 71 I Ire -7 F'I'-^7f pit. 8e4a> I Z,67 0,1,2,- 11CG✓ 4tG*r,ty rLw .0 0 0 coq. boaq TOTAL- I q 7th 101 &e...0 142-7 471-17.0k# Zas6ea%a4e r ai1C-7 a q2- 21/ 112.7 ,1ALG f t G Iv -7 27-- o qo=-." 447.9 CITY, STATE, NATIONALLY . APPLICABLE CODES 10,x74 upel 101x21 IJx1-1 10014 vwtG1 k fl7N> C 1'TAT,=' cf G s I-' f -a> t 41 r.� r --{4"F Her-rres tinoViti 4HE4flr-hR2 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS X1.4 tiu.i,,. ,lGa, 1r.IG.. *if%1n0.eagt I 14‘7 91t A r 9TV . Wit' Y11,644+41•1121.0 1 AA. VICINITY MAP _ _ um . ,r Or "' ig as Haig_ { .'."'.j.' ar ..._ . .a AV iwo ARTESI tt rr (�yt 9 \� ri C?l Rl1t •n 1'p,� S1' �.n � cz � �{ �1�u y '%N c C lE s BLVD ilx ' Q GRAM AV - 9O25'y . IIfWDSA eacr . , ' t �• z r s, � ' a ,r \ n . 4" §t" sl •� '� pl �o�\ A „\,,, 18tH 51 y wu lox xrG _ '''' M "6 IN • 1," sr ftor x - 1;i 1 �-j 2 BfA[H C 1\ - • "{r iC�•R c Y ING� \11 «4 w;rix `a +: ,3L- H v` sY 9s v. N56n `g--1 s 1st ,w 151 •.11 yRJ` Ste. tll fro' \ A W f m" N ~ A I i r r��nxvm s 'K• •"GS P[CKRdJN� � cA LJp�, - Q( �v�b I.• c"x.1e 1�� .I Inn N _ ;?.:1 Si•! i p N ` � 3 �,v\` • Stamp Revisions 0 0 W U Y WF -4 W TOYSARO ARCHITECTURE 1001 Sixth Street No. 100 Manhattan Beach, Ca i ia 90266 Tel: 31.0.318.8089 Fax: 310.318.9400 H CA P4 O Project No. Permit Date Print Date DMIZSIXJ H C 0 EXISTING BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN rrs 4 O a a tr rr- O O • I V 2, ci P1 m ON IllAr Hd ONJD3fONd EXISTING FZESI EDENICE TOMARO DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURE, A.I.A. 800\IANUA-IT.\\BEACH BLVD. #100 MANNA IT\\BENCH. CA90266 i310i318-8089 blZO6 VD 1HDV3S VSOIAF213H 3fTh1 AV TILL kJAI 6ZVZ SNOT SIAM' 111 d TQmaro Design & Development express y reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, changed or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Tomaro Design & Development. • "�---:fl •' as_.rr...l Z. I 9 9t -I gt,l 10=0t1 9216" a ANTE 1= t 1001 -del x9-611' -r-1 IN' FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" • a ,z.ozikk‘.01 01 8 917 IZ oO r -j OY�IG� ‘.0 z 3 7 1 -N QF .f .J e RECEIVED 6 9 1997 PvNI NG DEPT. BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0' 11 WALL LEGEND EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN NEW STUD WALLS • Stamp Revisions 0 0 TOVAR 0 U O E H 0 N N 0 U 0 c m c 0 N N N a c N N N N a m « 70. 0 N 0 O 3 C N a a T ro 0 a 0 c N asN 0 0 a m L .0 0 8 ro ro ARCHITECTURE 1001 Sixth Street .046 Suite No. 100 0 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Tel: 310.318.8089 m Fax: 31.0.318.9400 ro FLOOR PLANS Project No. Permit Date Print Date m N 4) .0 c ro a d N N L_ C_ N r cn>, r 0 a 0 a r 0 a c m ,. t 0. 0. 0 U ro c 0 E U GO N N d N 1- a N N N a co m U N L U 0 4 ro E 0 r ni a Ct C� z 0 0 O [71X 1,23 -Z r rcn C Cri 2 F t11 t z n G CO Print Date Permit Date Project No. FLOOR PLANS © Tomaro Architecture expressly reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans CD a C 0 Tel: 310.318.8089 0 a-. • = „b/i H1VDS NVZd 10021 f vir '`\ b 03 trJa n btis rri C rri THE BERRY RESIDENCE 2429 MYRTLE AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 D /A Revisions A to a These plans are not to be reproduced, changed or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Tomaro Architecture. F oilk A °`� • 0/°t • Stamp lT' 0 0 41 Revisions MW ^T1 (7)4 per(« r' t • g16141 --6F- WA'( *I 121.14,44 EXTERIOR NOTES STUCCO: 'FLAT ROOFING: EXPOSED EAVES: CORBEL EAVES: IX)ORS: WINDOWS: LIGII'l'INO: CHIMNEY: EXTERIOR RAIL: SLOPED ROOFWO: COLUMNS: EXTERIOR STAIR: FLOOR VENTS: ATTIC VENTS: PRECAST CAP: 7/8- ROUGH/SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH STUCCO PLASTER OVER WIRE LAT!! ATTACHED WITH 84 COOLER NAILS (ul 6" OC. OWNER TO SELECT COIOIL BUILT UP HOT MOP ASPHALT ROOFING WI'IIITI 1/4" PER 12" MIN. SLOPE. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFICATIONS. MINIMUM CI -ASS II FIRE RATINO. EXPOSED 6X6 RAFTER TAIL EAVES PAINTED PER ARCIII1'ECTS' DIRECTION. SEE DETAIL PRECUT PLYWOOD CORBEI. EAVES WTITI STUCCO OVER. SEE .DF;FAII. SINGLE GLAZED WOO1) SASH PATIO DOORS. DUEL GLAZED VINYL SASH WINDOWS. EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE. OWNER .rc)SELEC'l'. ICBG APPROVED SPARK ARRESTOR 'rc) TOP OF PREFAB METAL. CHIMNEY. PROVIDE IAMPO AND CITY APPROVED METAL CAP OVER. TOP OF CHIMNEY AT 2'-0" ABOVE ANY PART OF ROOF WITHIN LIN 10' 0". MUST BE A LISTED ASSEMBLY APPROVED BY TILE CITY. OWNER 'r0 SELECT. SEE. DETAIL 3'-0" 111011 WROUGHT IRON IIANDRAH. ANI) SPINDLES WI'T'H IN'1'ERMEDIA'I'I: SUPPORTS NT 4' OC. SEE DETAIL ONE PIECE SPANISH'S' TILE ROOFING BY DELEO CLAY TILE COMPANY 014 EQUAL, IC130. 43416 OVER ONE LAYER OF 430 FELT PAPER. INS'T'ALL PER MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFICATIONS. SEE DETAIL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMNS 'ID BE INSTALLED OVER STRUCTURAL POST. INSTALL IN HALVES AND PATCH. ARCHrtter TO SELECT. PRECAST CONCRETE TREADS OVER CONCRETE STEPS ON GRADE. SEE DETAIL 6"X14" GALVANIZED UNDERFLOOR VENTS. PROVIDE 1 SF OF VENT FOR EVERY 150 SE. OF UNDERFLOOR AREA. IS" DIA. HALF ROUND ATTIC VENTS. PROVIDE 1 SF. OF VENT FOR EVERY 150 SF. OF ATTIC AREA. PAINT TO MATCII ROOFING. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP ATTACHED SECURELY TO EDGE OF DECK OR PLANTER. /4 SX 1 F -4L -i 0,011-pI r-ka I7tZ. Va W . I1ON SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE : 1/4" = l'-0" Ni ST FL 1I',VATION SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" RECEIVED 3;j% 0 9 5997 pt.ANNING DEPT' To MA U O 0 ro 0 N 0 U c c as 0 N E(n U 0. c 0 N N N a x N 0 c 0 .0 0 N 5 0 L r ro '0 4- c c ro 0 '0 C 0) y N ro ro L 0 ro t0 ro 0 ro 0 N 0Y ro L iliOro c c ro E `o E 0 ARCHITECTURE ro 1.001 Sixth Street ro Suite No, 100 ro Manhattan Beach, California 90266 ro 0 Tel: 310.318.8089 ro Fax: 31.0.318.9400 ro a ELEVATIONS Project No. Permit Date Print Date c ro a 0 N 0) w c N L 0) r ro a O 0. m L O '0 ro m o.O U' 0 ro c O E E 0 U N to0 a) ro co m >' (n N 0 a x N 0 U, 0) .c 0 O (0 E F 0 N7vck N ..- o 1.7" .4 os>co.-r� 8`7.7�j1 O O EXTERIOR NOTES STUCCO: FIAT ROOFING: EXPOSED EAVES: CORBEL EAVES: DOORS: WINDOWS: LIMITING: CHIMNEY: EXTERIOR RAIL: SLOPED ROOFING: COLUMNS: EXTERIOR STAIR: FLOOR VENTS: ATTIC VENTS: PRECAST CAP: 7/11" ROUGH/SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH STUCCO PLASTER OVER WIRE LATH ATTACHED WITH Sd COOLER NAILS @ 6" OC. OWNER TO SELECT COLOR. BUILT UP HOT MOP ASPHALT ROOFING WITH 1/4" PER 12" MIN. SLOPE: '-' INSTALL. PER MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFICATIONS. MINIMUM CLASS II FIRE RATING. L.. EXPOSED 6X6 RAFTER TAIL EAVES PAINTED PER ARCHITECTS' DIRECTIO SEE DETAIL PRECUT PLYWOOD CORBEL EAVES WITH STUCCO OVER. SEE DETAIL. SINGLE GLAZED WOOD SASH PATIO DOORS. DUEL GLAZED VINYL. SASH WINDOWS. EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE. OWNER TO SELECT. ICAO APPROVED SPARK ARRESTOR TO TOP OF PREFAB METAL CHIMNEY. PROVIDE IAMPO AND CITY APPROVED METAL. CAP OVER. TOP OF CHIMNEY AT 2'-0" ABOVE ANY PART OF ROOF WITHIN 10%01 MUST BE A LISTED ASSEMBLY APPROVED BY THE CITY. OWNER TO SELECT. SEE DETAIL 3'-0" HIGH WROUGHT IRON HANDRAIL. AND SPINDLES WITH INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS AT 4' OC. SEE DETAIL ONE PIECE SPANISH'S' TILS ROOFING BY DE.LEO CLAY TILE COMPANY OR EQUAL, ICHO. 43416 OVER ONE LAYER 01' 430 FELT PAPER. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFICATIONS. SEE DETAIL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMNS TO BE INSTALLED OVER STRUCTURAL POST INSTALL IN HALVES AND PATCH. ARCIILT ECr TO SELECT. PRECAST CONCRETE TREADS OVER CONCRETE STEPS ON GRADE. SEE DETAIL. 6"XI4" GALVANIZED UNDERFLOOR VENTS. PROVIDE I SR OF VENT FOR EVERY 150 SF. OF UNDERFLOOR AREA. 18" DIA HALF ROUND ATTIC VENTS. PROVIDE 1 SF. OF VENT FOR EVERY 150 SF. OF ATTIC AREA. PAINT TO MATCI I ROOFING. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP ATTACHED SECURELY TO EDGE OF DECK OR PLANTER. - rJrajGONG=&Ta11741 je 1 1 1 • Stamp Revisions A 0 ,TOYA Fl jV-E ';✓ 41•417 L,ati1.pu-1C' a NORTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" a st RECEIVED JWtl091997 14PT. ARCHITECTURE 1001 Sixth Street Suite No. 100 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 T; e l : 310.318.8089 Fax: 310.31.8.9400 ELEVATIONS Project No. Permit Date Print Date q 0,040n4z takktit 1471t -1a Pac t7 aC,,T-i rJ SECTION A SCALE : 1/4"— P-0" RECEIVED JIM 0 91997 PLANNING DEPT. Revisions 0 TOYA without first obtaining the express written permission and Consent of Tomaro Arc ro a a c C ltl O 0 0 c 0) N N ro 0 O 0 N O ro C0 c 0 > O O N c0 c ro E `0 ARCHITECTURE 2- 0 1001 Sixth Street Suite No. 100 ro U -1.anhattan Beach; 8 California 90266 Tel: 310.318.8089 Fax: 310.318.9400 ro ro CA O H CA Project No. Permit Date Print Date 0) c ro 0. 0 N 0 c .l) O .17 r 0 0 O o. 0 L O t C 0 .0 0) T 0. 0 U ro c 0 E E 0 U N N () En0 0 0 N a N N O 0. x m 3 U d L 2 Q O ro E 0