HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/23/97AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, December 23, 1997 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Regular Session - 7:10 p.m.
MAYOR
6—Sam Y. Edgerton
MAYOR PRO TEM
Robert Benz
COUNCIL MEMBERS
–'John Bowler
,‘5 -- Julie Oakes
Reviczky
CITY CLERK
Elaine Doerfling
CITY TREASURER
John M. Workman
CITY MANAGER
Stephen R. Burrell
CITY ATTORNEY
Michael Jenkins
All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every
agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police
Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of
Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL G
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:10 P.M.
1. ORDINANCE EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE DEMOLITION OR
MODIFICATION OF HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES
AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 11, 1997.
RECOMMENDATION: Waive full reading and adopt ordinance.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may
do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT Al
•
g,A
/g/
i��
am' ,�_
e'71 A � � s -cam
December 11, 1997
Honorable Mayor and Members Special Meeting of
of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 23, 1997
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE
DEMOLITION OR MODIFICATION OF HISTORIC AND
ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES AND DECLARING
THE URGENCY THEREOF
Recommendation:
Waive the full reading and adopt the Ordinance.
Background: •
In response to public concern regarding the possible demolition of the Bijou Theater
auditorium, the City Council previously adopted an Urgency Moratorium Ordinance, and
subsequently extended it, to prohibit demolition of historic and architectural resources in
the City. The status of the Bijou theater property has not changed and the Council still
has significant concerns about the potential demolition and loss of the building.
Analysis:
Based upon City Council concern, staff is providing a one year Moratorium Ordinance
extension for City Council consideration. The Ordinance will provide time for staff to
complete an inventory of the City's historic resources and to prepare any new zoning
regulations necessary for the preservation of historic and architecturally significant
buildings in the City. This is the second and final extension of the Moratorium Ordinance.
Sol Blumenf d, birector
Community evelopment Department
Concur:
Stephen R. Bu
City Manager
;\?
Attachments:
1. Urgency Moratorium Ordinance and Exhibit A
ORDINANCE NO. 7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH) 0j)
EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE DEMOLITION OR
MODIFICATION OF HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTURAL
RESOURCES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Moratorium extended. The moratorium established
by Ordinance No. 96-1168U adopted on December 17, 1996 and extended by Ordinance
No. 97-116U on January 28, 1997 is hereby extended pursuant to Government Code
Section 65858 for a period of one year to December 16, 1998.
Section 2. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance
shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or
by imprisonment in County jail for not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and
imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and
distinct violation of this Ordinance. In addition to the foregoing, any violation of this
Ordinance shall constitute a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as provided
by all applicable provisions of law.
Section 3. Statement of Purpose and Urgency Findings. The
City of Hermosa Beach continues to conduct studies relative to the identification of
historically and architecturally significant resources within the City, and to the efficacy of
protecting those resources by means of an historic preservation ordinance. In order to do
so, it is in the process of engaging the services of consultants to assist in the identification
and inventorying or historic resources, and preparing an appropriate historic preservation
ordinance. Pending completion of such studies, and the preparation and adoption of the
appropriate zoning regulations, it is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public
peace, health, safety and welfare that existing potential historic and architecturally
significant resources not be altered or destroyed, which would defeat the very purpose of
adopting a historic preservation ordinance; consequently, it is necessary that this ordinance
take effect immediately.
If this ordinance does not take effect immediately, actions might be
undertaken which may be in conflict with the ordinance ultimately adopted and that
historic and architectural resources might be altered or demolished so as to undermine the
very purpose of that ordinance.
Due to the foregoing circumstances, there is a current and immediate threat
to the public health, safety, and welfare. Potential architecturally and historically
significant resources have been identified by means of a survey, and those resources are
listed in Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 97-116U. These structures are not necessarily the
.2
only resources which may be identified, nor are the structures listed in Exhibit A
necessarily ultimately going to be designated as resources. Nonetheless, the alteration or
demolition of the structures listed in Exhibit A would constitute a threat to the public
health, safety, and welfare. Therefore, it is necessary for the preservation of the public
peace, health, safety and welfare that this ordinance take effect immediately. This
ordinance is the second and final extension of an interim ordinance and shall expire one
year after the adoption thereof.
This is an interim measure, adopted pursuant to the authorization of State
law in order to maintain the status quo pending the completion of the studies and adoption
of amended zoning regulations, or sooner. It is not a final disposition as to development
of any particular parcel of property within the City.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 23t day of December, 1997.
MAYOR and PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL
Attest: Approved as to form:
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
Building
Exhibit A
Address
Comments
1. Bank of America Building
2. Hermosa Hotel
3. Bijou Theater
90 Pier Ave. One of oldest commercial
structures in downtown.
26 Pier Ave. The oldest building in
downtown.
1229 Hermosa Ave. Oldest movie theater in City.
• ALWAYS TRAVEL
• PATRICK MALLOY' S
• ALOHA SHARKEEZ
• THE SEELEY COMPANY
• CHAMPION CHEVROLET
• MANHATTAN BEACH BAR & GRILL
• RUSS BERRIE & CO.
• FAT FACE FENNER' S FALLOON
• HENNES SEY' S BAR & GRILL
• DOWNTOWN BAKERY
• PAISANO'S PIZZA
• CLUB SUSHI
• CANTINA REAL
• HERMOSA BEACH WOMAN'S CLUB
• HAWTHORNE SAVINGS BANK 41/�
• BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES
• CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE
TIfIF\T Of RecOONWON
J4lwags `Travel was an important participant in the
5th annual Teach Cities 'Coy 'Drive; and,
wbeiRem., through the efforts of those involved in this went,
thousands of togs were donated and distributed to needy children through local
charities such as the 1Cenng !Nicholson 5oundcition, 2larbor Child Crisis
Center, 1736 douse and fRichstone Center;
NOW, The RefOR , ]C, Sam T. Edgerton, Jlayor of the
City of 2iermosa Teach, do hereby issue this certificate of recognition
commending (Always 'travel for their participation in the 5th annual Teach
Cities .`Tog Drive.
Dated: December 23,1997
Elaine Doer fling, City l lerk
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
June 8, 1983
City Council Meeting'.
of June 14, 1983
HERMOSA BEACH CITIZENS WHO DIED IN
MILITARY SERVICE
Councilmember Wood requested that we ascertain the names of Hermosa.
Beach citizens who have died while serving in the United States
military. Congressman Levine assisted us in obtaining the avail-
able information from the National Archives and Records Service.
Listed below are the vital statistics of such persons for the
Korean Conflict and the Vietnam Conflict. No such lists by home
town are available for the Spanish American War, World War I and
World War II. To obtain names from those conflicts would require
a manual search of thousands of pages of records. Should your
Honorable Body wish this to be pursued, it is suggested that we
solicit volunteers to perform the necessary readings. Perhaps
this could be done through the American Legion, Rotary Club or
Kiwanis; ;Club.
Name
Louis Brandt Moore, Jr.
Timothy P. Guglielmoni
Michael Ross McCann::
Danny Lee McMinn
Rande Lee Nichols
Anthony Steven Papalas
Gerald Loyd Rowen II
Ronald Lee Schuyler
George Leonard Shook, J
GTM/ld
Rank
Cpl.
Pfc.
Pfc.
Cpl.
Pfc.
Pfc.
_SP4
Pfc.
Pfc.
Country of
Service :`Casualty
Marines Korea
Army S. Vietnam
Army S. Vietnam
Army S. Vietnam
Army S. Vietnam
Army S. Vietnam
Army S. Vietnam
Army S. Vietnam
Marines S. Vietnam
Date of
Death
10/9/51
5/24/67
7/19/69
2/15/67
4/21/70.
7/10/67
12/26/67
10/31/68
9/22/65
13
k %
r
)
--...1
----,
,
c'kc
L---.&-
L----
'zr"
b—
c---.
.(
t
villp
,,
••••,.., "cull..
'F'!-.._
16
I
i
0
6
PO
vL
LEGISLATIVE RECORD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
SUBJECT
Street Sweepin
DATE
BOOK
PAGE
9/13/77
Petition re Sidewalk,Street Cleaning,Pier/HermoEa
21
3680
5/27/80
Clean-up of Walk Streets
23
4+383
9/23/80
Mr. Marvin Thompson came forward re concerns on Street cleaning
stalls/clarification on Parking Permits/guest permits
23
4380
9/23/80
Street Sweeping on Beach Dr./Parking Enforcement as to
parking on private property
23
4386
6/14/83
Report - Sani tati nn PgpP11fnr 1989—RR RR1F
24
5nR1
12/16/85
Award sowntown street cleaning Contract nt
Specialty Maintenance
5915
LEGISLATIVE RECORD
CITY CLERK
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
SUBJECT Street Sweeping
DATE
BOOK
PAGE
7/22/75
Proposed 4 -hour zones, 5 -day week - discussion
21
3197
1/13/76
Authorize Preparation of Specs -New small street
sweeper
21
3281
3/23/76
Small Street Sweeper -authorize publication of notice
inviting bids on April 13, 1976.
21
3310
4/27/76
Award of bid -Small Street Sweeper to Tennant Co.
21
3343
7/27/76
Offers to Purchase Small City -Owned Street Sweeter
-
authorization to sell City's used Model 644 Wayne
Power Sweeper to R.J. Lisou Co for $600
21
340G
9/28/76
Street Sweeping Schedule - revised
21
3455
1/25/77
Res. No. 77 -4103 -Street Cleaning Sweeping Schedule
21
3510
4/26/77
Authorize notice inviting bids -4 -wheel air sweeper
21
3577
6/14/77
Award of bid -street sweeper to Farron-Freeman
21
3608-9
7/26/77
Restricted parking - Street cleaning days
21
3652
8/23/77
Petition re Sidewalk & St Cleaning-Pier/HnrmoGa-
• mi ui -r _fa.i tea- meati • a Of 9/33/77
a
69-
STREET SWEEPING
Restickable Square Stickers #3111
AVERY®
RMo
%94
C).
1907 1997
C.?),
•
0
h.
1907
Oct
1997
V;C
1907 1997
to.
4Z-
An\tiVeY'*..
r
CITV OF H EPMOSA BEACH
INTER -DEPARTMENT MEMO
TO• Mayor and Members of the Council
SUBJECT COUNCIL MEETINGS - MINUTES
DATE- January 24 , 1983
FROM Charlotte Malone, City Clerk
Dear Honorables:
As the elected official responsible for providing a true and: accurate
record of council meetings, I wish to make the following suggestions:
1. That you each prepare your motions' in. written/arnen:ded :form -prior to
presentation, giving a copy to the Mayor and Clerk after presentation.
Upon statement of the motion by the Chair (Mason's Rules of Legislative
Procedure) the motion would not change.
2. That Mason's Rules be followed as to procedure (second, substitute,
amendments, etc.) and that the Chair enforce the Rules.
3. That councilpersons wishing "to make inquiry" of staff do so prior
to a council meeting. Please see HBMC Sec. 2-15 attached.
4. That you decide among yourselves a reasonable method for limiting
debate. Possibly a "gag" rule, one minute per councilperson per
item; one-half minute per councilperson for rebuttal per item.
That a time certain be set for Public Hearings/Hearings.-and Muni Matters
which might result in spirited and lengthy discussion. At the last.
meeting, the following times were spent on *specific items:
Item 5 - APPEAL-BZA THREE STORY HEIGHT LIMITATION 45:mins.
Item 6 - CONDO CONVERSION AMENDMENTS 45 mins.
' This item has been before council five times.
On 12-14-82, time spent was- - - -25 mins.
Item 7 - Storer 15 mins.
Items 10 & it -IN LIEU AND PARK AND RIDE 45 mins,.
It is wasteful of money and staff time to continually have these marathon
meetings. A highly qualified person hired to transcribe the minutes of
1=11-83 took 28 hours @ $10/hr to do so. Since she was unfamiliar with
our procedure and the last meeting was particularly disorganized, it was
necessary for me to spend 10 hours to bring the minutes .into conformity
with the "facts Sometimes even careful hearing of the tapes does not
make clear what happened, or that the "action" conformed to the rules. .
This member of "staff" is exhausted for 2 or 3 days after a meeting unable
to function efficiently at the very time when follow up on actions should
be done.
I urge you to give consideration to more orderly procedure and limitin
of discussion/debate.
Charlotte Malone, City Clerk
June 1, 1995.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Counci! June 27, 1995
REQUEST TO AMEND UTILITY USER TAX ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE
INTERSTATE, INTERNATIONAL, AND CELLULAR
TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance, amending
Section 30-46, to include interstate, international, and cellular telecommunications
services.
Background:
Currently, only intrastate (within the State) phone calls are subject to the utility users
tax (UUT). When the UUT was implemented in 1985, the ordinance was drafted using
another city's ordinance as a guide. At the time, it was generally believed that
interstate phone calls could not be taxed due to interstate commerce laws. A U.S.
Supreme Court decision in 1989 clarified that interstate and international calls can be
taxed .
Analysis:
The attached survey of thirty-seven (37) cities in the Los Angeles area indicates that
overall, 65% of the cities apply the UUT to alt telephone services; 100% apply the tax
to -intrastate calls; 81 % apply the tax to interstate; 84% apply the tax to international
calls; and 65% apply the tax to the newer -technology, cellular phones.
The interstate commerce issue previously created a loophole. At this time, however
there is no legal reason that other telecommunication services should be exempt.
From an equity standpoint, all telecommunication services could be taxed the same,
unless there is a specific reason to exclude them.
The UUT revenue estimate for 1995-96 has been increased by $50,000, $30,000 to the
General Fund, $20,000 to the 4% UUT Fund (the 60/40 split between funds). The
actual impact of the change is difficult to estimate since cities who have the tax have no
way of attributing tax collections to international calls, interstate calls, etc.. The
collecting companies send a check for the tax due, with no breakdown of information.
Culver City and Torrance both estimate the increase in telephone tax to be about 25%,
however, their international business would undoubtedly be higher than in Hermosa
Beach.
UUTITEM/C/Ikks
JUNE 13, 1995
Our two largest long distance carriers, ATT and Sprint, each estimate an additional
$40,000 - $50,000 in revenue from their company, but caution that the estimate is
based on similar cities and does not reflect actual usage in Hermosa Beach. With no
actual data upon which to base the estimate, a conservative estimate of $50,000 seems
a good approach.
Sections 2 and 4 of the ordinance simply add the words interstate, international, and
cellular language to each section. Section 2 is being amended to correct an incorrect
code citation in the previous ordinance.
The ordinance is drafted to take effect immediately upon adoption since it relates to
taxes, however, practically speaking, it will take effect as soon as the telephone
companies can implement it, probably in August.
Respectfully submitted:
aicaotz.
Viki Copeland, Stephe'h F . Burrell,
City Manager
NOTED:
Finance Director
UUTITEM/C/Vc .JUNE 13, 1995
2
3
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 30, TAXATION, ARTICLE VL UTILITIES TAX, SECTION 30-46, RELATIN
TO TELEPHONE TAX.
WHEREAS, the City has conducted a review of the utility user tax relating to
telephone charges;
WHEREAS, the City's utility user tax relating to telephone charges currently is
applied only to intrastate calls;
WHEREAS, there is no limitation on applying the tax to interstate telephone
calls;
WHEREAS, a review of thirty-seven (37) cities reflect that at least 81 % of the
cities reviewed currently apply the utility user tax on interstate, intrastate, and
international telephone communication services. In addition, 65% apply the tax on
cellular telephone communications when the owner or lessee of the telephone has a
billing address within the City;
WHEREAS, the City will increase revenues by subjecting interstate,
international, and cellular telephone communications to the City's utility user tax;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 30, Taxation, Article VI. Utilities Tax, Section 30-44 is
hereby amended to add the following definition: -
uTelephone Communication Services" shall mean services which provide
access to a telephone system and the privilege of telephone communication with
substantially allpersons having telephone stations which are part of such
telephone system: The term "telephone communication services" includes
digital and cellular telephone service, when the owner or lessee of the telephone
has a billing address in the City, but does not include other forms of land mobile
UUTORD/CflAt
1
2
3
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
service or maritime mobile services as defined in Section 2.1 of Title 47 of the
code of Federal Regulations."
SECTION 2. Chapter 30, Taxation, Article VI. Utilities Tax, Section 30-46 (a),
relating to Telephone Tax is hereby amended to read "There is hereby imposed a tax
upon every person in the city, other than a telephone corporation, using intrastate,
interstate, or international telephone communication services in the City. The tax
imposed by this section shall be at the rate of ten (10%) percent of all charges made for
such service and shall be paid by the person paying for such services."
SECTION 3. Chapter 30, Taxation, Article VI. Utilities Tax, Section 30-46 (c),
relating to Telephone Tax is hereby amended to read; "Notwithstanding the provisions
of subsection (a), the tax imposed under this section shall not be imposed upon any
person for using telephone communication services to the extent that the amounts paid
for such services are exempt from or not subject to the tax imposed under Division 2,
Part 20 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code or the tax imposed under Title 26,
Section 4251 of the United States Code."
SECTION 4. Chapter 30, Taxation, Article VI. Utilities Tax, Section 30-46 (d),
relating to Telephone Tax is hereby amended to read; "The tax imposed by this section
shall be collected from the service user by the person providing or receiving payment
for the telecommunication -services. The amount of the tax collected in one (1) month
shall be remitted to the tax administrator on or before the last day of the following
month; or the amount of tax collected in one (1) month shall be remitted to the tax
administrator on or before the last day of the following month; or at the option of the
person required to collect and remit the tax, an estimated amount of tax collected,
measured by the tax bill in the previous month, shall be remitted to the tax administrator
on or before the last day of each month."
UUTORD/C&Os
Page 2
1
3
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18.
19
20
21
24
25
26
27
SECTION 6. Several)!Illy. If any section, subsection, subdivision,
paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any
reason is held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision
paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases
be declared invalid.
SECTION 6. Effective Date This ordinance relates to taxes for the usual and
current expenses of the City and, pursuant to Government Code Section 36937, shall
take effect immediately.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 27th day of June, 1995.
PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY ATTORNEY
////l
/m. r/
UUTORD/Clitta
Page 3
UTILITY USER TAX SURVEY
2. Arcadia
5% Not specific
Y
4. Burbank
7%
Not specific
Y
6. Compton
10% Not specific
Y
8. Culver City
11% Not specific
Y
10. El Monte
7% Not specific
Y
12. Gardena
4% Not specific
14. Hawthorne
..........................
:s eel
10% I Not specific
Y
16. Hidden Hills
10%
Gen. Oper.
Y
Y
18. Irwindale
7.5% ' Gen. Oper.
Y
N
N
N
UUTSURVY/clue
AS OF 5/30/95
UTILITY USER TAX SURVEY
20. Los Angeles
22. Malibu
5% Gen. Oper.
Y
24. Monterey Park
5%
Comm
3.5%
Res.
Gen. Oper.
Y
26. Paramount
3% Gen. Oper.
Y
28. Pomona
10% Gen. Oper.
Res.
12%
Comm
Y
30. Redondo Beach
4.75% Gen. Oper.
Y
32. Santa Monica
10% Gen. Oper.
Y
34. Seal Beach
UUTSURW/C/1`As
11% Gen. Oper.
Y
ASOF5/30/95
UTILITY USER TAX SURVEY
Telephone Legend (1) Intrastate (2) Interstate (3) International (4) Cellular
UUTSURVY/C/Imes AS QF 5/30/95
ITEM #5
REQUEST OF UNOCAL AT 755 PIER AVENUE FOR
A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
OR NECESSITY FOR OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE
LICENSE.
This item was continued from meeting of March 25, 1997
TO REVIEW STAFF REPORT,
PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #11 IN THE
AGENDA PACKET OF
MARCH 25, 1997.
STAFF REPORT ALSO AVAILABLE
FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY
MANAGER'S OFFICE AND CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE.
PRODUCTS COMPANY
April 1, 1997
City of Hermosa Beach
Councilmember J. R. Reviczky
600 Ardmore Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
CUP 96-15
UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 1840
755 PIER STREET
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Dear Councilmember Reviczky:
In anticipation of the April 8, 1997 City Council hearing to consider our request
to issue a letter of .public convenience and necessity for the above project the
following is provided.
On March 4, 1997, the Planning Commission approved the construction of a
FASTBREAK food mart and a PROWASH Express car wash and gasoline
facilities at this gateway location in the City of Hermosa Beach.
The parking lot of our business is sufficient in size to accommodate the parking
needs of our FASTBREAK customers and will not tend to create parking
concerns for the adjacent properties. The parking lot will be illuminated for
security and will be continually monitored. Care will be exercised to ensure that
such lighting does not adversely affect the nearby properties. We continue in
our strong tradition of being a responsible retailer by complying with ABC laws
and regulations, as well as, following the retail standards outlined in 25612.5
and 23790.5.
The cashier's area will be situated in such a way so as to maximize observation
capabilities of the cashier and other personnel within the store.
Police patrols will have a clear and unobstructed view of the site from the street
and can easily observe the interior of the store from the street as well.
There will be an interior restroom available to our customers which will be
monitored continually for safety and cleanliness.
555 Anton Blvd., Costa Mesa, California 92626
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 25376, Santa Ana, California 92799-5376
Telephone (7141 428-8051
A Unocal Company
Councilmember Reviczky
April 1, 1997
Page 2
Our site operator and employees will participate in and successfully complete a
comprehensive training program which includes segments on safety and
accident prevention, loitering deterrence, responsible tobacco retailing and
alcohol awareness and effective merchandising. 76 Product Company's track
record throughout the State of California is exemplary, and we do not anticipate
any crime problems at this location due in part to the proactive approach 76
Products Company and Spirit Enterprises, Inc. takes to the operation of our
FASTBREAK stores.
Before selecting this location, 76 Products Company conducted marketing
surveys to determine the viability of this use at this location. It was determined
that this site will serve public convenience and necessity due, in part, to its
location on two major thoroughfares, Pier Street and Pacific Coast Highway.
Our marketing research indicates beer and wine will constitute a small portion of
overall sales. However, we have found that customers expect to pump their
gasoline and take advantage of the market to pick up small grocery items such
as a carton of milk, loaf of bread or a soda. Our experience show that customers
want to be able to satisfy most or all of their quick shopping needs while their
motor vehicle is being fueled. If we do not meet the needs of our customers they
will not return to our station. Realigning our services with the market conditions
gives 76 Products Company the opportunity to reinvest in the community.
There are no other off sale sites in the vicinity that have developed a program to
regulate their own sale of beer and wine as 76 Products Company has. We
have established these guidelines for the operation based on our operational
experience, community concern and law enforcement recommendations. Spirit
Enterprises, Inc. has incorporated a number of conditions in the procedures
proposed for this location that will reduce the opportunity of our business
interfering with the quiet enjoyment of the nearby residents. These conditions
include restrictions on hours of sale, no magnum beers, fortified malt liquors or
wines will be permitted, no coin operated amusement devices or video games
and loitering and littering will be strictly prohibited.
76 Products Company welcomes the opportunity to meet the demand of the
motoring public by providing the convenience of state of the art fueling and
market facilities offering a full array of products.
Councilmember Reviczky
April 1, 1997
Page 3
76 Products Company has expended great time and effort assembling a team of
experts including architects, engineers, security consultants, management and
training programs and traffic consultants to design a facility which will assure
that no negative contribution to crime statistics will occur.
Public convenience and necessity will be served in the City of Hermosa Beach
by providing its citizens with an attractive, clean,'well lit, safe, continually
monitored state of the art facility and a responsible retailer who meets and fulfills
both the motoring fuel requirements and grocery needs of its customers.
Thank you for this opportunity to share this information with you. I will be glad to
speak with you should you require any additional information prior to next week's
hearing.
I look forward to speaking with you in the very near future.
MEA/bmf
cc: City of Hermosa Beach
Mr. Stephen Burrell
City Manager
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Sin 'erely,
ree Elana Arenas
James Lissner
2715 El Oeste
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
(310) 376-4626
March 25, 1997
Hermosa Beach City Council
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Re: Meeting of March 25, item 11, Unocal
Councilmembers:
You are being asked to make a determination of "Public
Convenience or Necessity". Did you know that that phrase
is undefined - that the ABC Code (Business and Professions
Code Section 23000 et seq.) contains NO definition at all?
How are you going to find Public Convenience or Necessity
when no one knows what it is?
Is one more convenience store on Pier Avenue where we
already have Roberts', Abe's, Altadena and Simpson's down
the street and Sav-On and Von's on the same block, Public
Convenience or Necessity? Is it one more convenience store
on PCH where we already have Coast, 7-11, Thrifty Oil,
Ralph's, Manhattan Liquors, and Lucky? Is Public
Convenience or Necessity met when the applicant's project
will simply duplicate services provided one block away (at
Thrifty Oil)?
Is it Public Convenience or Necessity when you know that
the last time you checked (decoy operation of July 1994),
small liquor outlets such as the one proposed here were
more likely than not to sell liquor to teenagers (such as
the children four of you are raising)?
Is it Public Convenience or Necessity when you know that
gas stations get robbed a lot, that in fact both nearby
stations were robbed in 1996 (see attached official
printout of 1996 robberies), and that in general the
project's block has such a disturbing number of robberies
and carjackings that full-time private security is on
patrol? Is it Public Convenience or Necessity when you
know that assaultive violence occurs in proportion to
liquor outlets (the Scribner report), that in our town it
occurs near those outlets (see attached 1995 and 1996
maps), and that we already have an.'existing cluster of
outlets and violence at PCH/Pier? Is it Public Convenience
or Necessity when you know that the government's efforts to
prevent robberies, carjackings, and assaults at new liquor
outlets and parking lots costs more than the tiny marginal
increase in income we have seen as we have added more
liquor outlets to those dividing up the pie?
So what is Public Convenience? In the absence of an
official definition, I define Public Convenience not simply
as a project that will be convenient, but one that will
make a significant improvement in the convenience of
availability of a service. This project does not meet that
definition. While the proposed project will provide a
service, and will undoubtedly have many satisfied
customers, its services are simply duplicative of services
in the immediate neighborhood and offer no improvement in
the availability of them. Gas and snacks are available in
one quick stop at the Mobil and the Thrifty Oil just down
the street. The Thrifty Oil has liquor, too. I have
bought gas at the Thrifty Oil many times and never have had
to wait more than a minute to be served. How can the
proposed project improve upon that convenience?
And what is Public Necessity? Is this project Necessary?
Is having an additional outlet for gas, snacks, and liquor
necessary? I submit that when a project is only one of
many providers of a necessity, and is likely to consume
more city services than it will bring in increased taxes,
it is not necessary.
You may not agree with the above. So, I hope you will go
on record as to what you think Public Convenience or
Necessity is.
Sincerely,
Attachments:
1996 robberies: HBPD official printout
1995, 1996 assaults: Maps of geog. distribution
#kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*k*kkk#k**kkk**********#kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*****kkki****kltkkkk#kkkkkkkkkk*kkk**kkkkk****************ikAAAA
kkkkkkkkkkkk*kkk*kkk*kkk*k*kkk**Akkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkk#kk*kkk**kkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkAidak*kkkkk#kkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkk
M M III L L EEEEE RRRR
MM MMILLERR
MMM I I. L E •R R
MMIL L EEEE RRRR
MKIL L E RI
MMIL L E RR
M H III LLLLL LLLLL EEEEE R R
H H BBBB EEEEE
HHBBE
HHBBE.
HHHHH BBBB EEEE
HHBBE
HHBBE
H H BBBB EEEEE
kkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkAidoWkkkkkkkkkkk*kkk*kk*kkkk**kkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkk*kkkkkkk*kkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.
L III SSE TIM CCC RRRR III M M EEEEE RRRR EEEEE CCC 000 RRRR DDDD SSS
L ISST C C R R I MM HM E .R R .E CCOORRDDSS
L 1 S T C RI I MMM E BRE C OORRDDS
L I_ S t C RRRR I H M EEEE RRRR EEEE C 0 0 RRRR D D S
L 1 5 T C RR IHRE RR E C 0 O RR D D S
L I S S I CCRRI M M E RRE C C D O R R B D S S
LLLLL III SSE T CCC R R III M M EEEEE R R EEEEE CCC 000 R R DDDD SSS
( BBBB M M )
( B B M8 MK )
( B B MMM )
( BBBB M Mi )
( B B M M )
( B B M II )
( BBBB M M )
kkkkkkkkkkkkkk***k*kkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkk*kkkWAAAkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkk;
OPTION: LISCRI PROGRAM: RECLISCRI SPEC: RECLISCRI
:"1:11141__
REOUESTED BY: MILLER ON: TXAI AT: 03-Fe�-' ;-i :22 PH
PARAMETERS:
1-Y
3-
4 - 030000
5 - 031470
G-
7-
A-
9 -
)O -
11 - 010196
12 - 12319G
TIME Rf:PORT STARTED RUNNING IS 03 -Feb -97 / 12:25 PM
Q
)71 .44ss cAritAt
fjpe?'" p,4/ 9 7
DO HOT DETACH FROM REPORT
kkkkkkk*kkk*kkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkkkkkk*kkkkkkkkkk*********kkk*kkk*kkkkkkkkkkkkk*kkk*kkk****kkk**k***kkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk#kkkkk#kkkkkkk*kkk#kkkkk**kkk#*kkkkkkkk*kkkkkkkk*k*k#kk**kkkkkkk**dc**kkkkkkkk**kkkkk#kkkkkkkkkk
RECLISCRI (BM) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE
FROM 030000 TO 031470 (DATE FROM 01/01196 TO 12/31/96)
REPORTING
NATCOD DESCRIPTION CASE NO. RD DEICER NAME
CLERK TY SECTION
AS OF 03 -Feb -97 12:23 PM PAGE 1
OCCURRENCE CLOSE
DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAT
030110 ROB GUN HWY 96-000633 2 HB0119 JAAKOLA LANCE HBC081 PC 211
LOCATION: HERMOSA AV. /30TH ST. , NB
030110 ROB GUN HWY 96-001316 2 HB0038 CRAY TOM HBP073 PC 211
LOCATION: 429 31ST ST., HB
030110 ROB GUN HWY 96-001317 2 HB0038 CRAY TOM HBP073 PC 211
LOCATION: 429 315T ST., HB
0301I0 ROB GUN HWY 96-003754 1 HB014G MCCOLGAN, LAN RC001 PC 211
LOCATION: HERMOSA AV. /4TH ST. , HB
030120 ROB GUN COM 96-000320 3 HB0102 TUREK TIM
LOCATION: 1160 AVIATION BL., HB
HBP075 PC 211
030120 ROB GUN COM 96-002680 3 HB0122 BOHACIK DAVID HBP073 PC 211
LOCATION: 2200 PCH, HB
030120 ROB GUN COM 96-004032 3 HB0143
LOCATION: 1025 PACIFIC COAST HY., HB
030120 ROB GUN COM 96-004248 3 HB0099
LOCATION: 901 AVIATION BL., HB
030130 ROB GUN GAS 96-000263 3 HB0121
LOCATION: 1131 PACIFIC COAST HY., HB
030130 ROB GUN GAS 96-001785 3 HB0119
LOCATION: 931 PACIFIC COAST NY., NB
030150 ROB GUN RES 96-003048
LOCATION: 327 6TH ST., NB
030170 ROB GUN MIS 96-004333 3.HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP075 PC 215
LOCATION: 709 PIER AV., NB
030170 ROB GUN MIS 96-004336 3 HB0114 RICKEY DAVID HBP075 PC 215
LOCATION: 709 PIER AV., HB
RAMIREZ, JAIM HBP070 PC 211
WOLCOTT PAUL HBPTO3 L
VINCENT WILLI HBC081 PC 211
enact F-tlf 01 I---
JAAKOLA LANCE HBC081 PC 211
Mo61t
1 HB0141 CHARLES BILL HBP070 PC 211
•
030220 ROB NIF COM 96-002339 2 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI HBP073 PC 211
LOCATION: 3201 MANHATTAN AV., NB
030360 ROB 0tH BNK 96-002379 1 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI HBP075 PC 211
LOCATION: 90 PIER AV., HB
030410 ROB S/A HWY 96-000545 3 HB0071 BOHLIN TOM HBC081 PC 211
LOCATION: 1107 PCH, HB
030410 ROB S/A HWY 96-000809 3 HB0065 KOEBSELL JOHN RC001 PC 211
LOCATION: PCH /21ST St. , HB
030410 ROB S/A HWY 96-000985 3 H80102 TUREK TIM HBC078 PC 211
LOCATION: 916 AVIATION BL., HB
ATTEMPT ROBB 02/28/96 2047 WED
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 04/26/96 1630 ERI HB0109 S
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 04/26/96 1640 FRI H00109 S
DESCRIPTION: ATTEMPT ONLY
ROBBERY . 11/08/96 1930 FRI
DESCRIPTION: SEE RPT 96-3755
ROBBERY 02/02/96 FRI
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY OB/07/96 0830 WED H00121 S
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 12/06/96 FRI
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 12/24/96 0743 TUE
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 01/27/96 2200 SAT
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY OG/04/96 0519 TUE
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 09/07/96 SAT
DESCRIPTION:
— ..
CARJACKING 12/30/96
TION:
CARJACKING ., 12/30/96
DESCRI'.TION:
ROBBERY 07/12/96
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 07/15/96
DESCRIPTION:
S
MON
MON
FRI HB0109 S
MON
ROBBERY 02/19/96 2000 MON
DESCRIPTION:
S
ROBBERY 03/02/96 1300 SAT
DESCRIPTION: COURTESY REPORT/MTA
ROBBERY 03/30/96 SAT NB012G J
DESCRIPTION:
RECLISCRI (BM) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE
FROM 030000 TO 031470 (DATE FROM 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96)
REPORTING
NATCOD DESCRIPTION CASE NO. RD OFICER NAME
CLERK TY SECTION
AS OF 03 -Feb -97 12:23 PH PAGE 2
OCCURRENCE CLOSE
DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAI
030410 ROB S/A HWY 96-002928 1 HB0143 RAMIREZ, JAIM HBP073 PC 211
LOCATION: 1300 BEACH DR., HB
030410 ROB S/A HWY 96-003377 2 HB0078 THOMPSON TOM HBP073 PC 211
LOCATION: 0 13TH ST., HB
030410 ROB S/A HWY 96-003749 2 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBC080 PC 211
LOCATION: HERMOSA AV. /181H ST
030450 ROB S/A RES 96-004331 2 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM
LOCATION: 2410 MANHATTAN AV., HB
030470 ROB S/A MIS 96-003014 1 HB0141 CHARLES BILL
LOCATION: THE STRAND /11TH ST. , HB
030470 ROB S/A MIS 96-004124 1 HB0102 TUREK TIM
LOCATION: 2 2ND ST:, KB
031110 A/ROB GUN HW! 96-001342 2 HB0114 RICKEY DAVID HBC081 PC 211
LOCATION: MONTEREY BL. /PARK AV. , HB
031410 A/ROB S/A HWY 96-002870 2 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBP070 PC 664/211
LOCATION: 157 PIER AV., KB
HBP075 PC 211
HBP073 PC •211
HBP075 PC 211
ROBBERY 08/29/96 1244 THU HB0126 S
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 10/04/96 2150 FRI HB0126 S
DESCRIPTION: LOT 8
ROBBERY 11/07/96 2100 THU
DESCRIPTION:
' ROBBERY 12/30/96 1800 MON
DESCRIPTION:
ROBBERY 09/03/96 2338 TUE HB0140 S
DESCRIPTION:
26 CRIME RECORDS PRINTED
ROBBERY 12/15/96 0229 SUN'
DESCRIPTION:
ATTMPT ROBBRY 04/28/96 0100 SUN
DESCRIPTION: ATTEMPT ONLY
ROB- 08/24/96 SAT
DESCRIPTION:
ASSAULTS - 1995
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
BOUNDAiIY
PI.
LONGFELLOW
PROVIDED BY:
CITIZENS TO SAVE
HERMOSA BEACH
(310) 376-4626
ARTESIA4— -BLVD
IS
' SZ
8.3'F\
oki 320:10
HERMOSA BEACH
MUNICIPAL $
MUNICIPAL PIER 89 59 ?9- -
'91 N
The numbers shown in
the dots on this map
refer to Key Numbers we
have added to the Hermosa
Beach Police Department
print-out entitled "Listing
of Crime Records by National
Code," codes 040000 to 040502,
February 7, 1996, copy
attached.
G
- 0 c -
., � y-
0
`o SA
•T Z
LG )t,..• • 5
1 r‘•-•.
-'L/
9
Lissner, 4-1-'
5,
•
C.•
•
•
AOUNOA�iY PI•—
LONGFELIOW ,AVE
*I e 3OT
O_�
W
25TH
•
MA ITA
O
PORTER If�_
24TH •
4H
9
o4
t
IotN
_ HERMOSA BEACH
• MUNICIPAL -PIER •
6
La
4'0
‘44,
The numbers shown in
the dots on this map
refer to Key Numbers we
have added to the Hermosa
Beach Police Department
print-out entitled "Listin
ASSAULTS - 1996
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
PROVIDED BY:
CITIZENS TO SAVE
HERMOSA BEACH
(310) 376-4626
`ARTEStA-1— --BLVD
to
201"
91
04.
G
IN�
t
•
Wyk
5
‘141Y1 z
1, feill —Cy
qZ. T( J.R
r f
•
..gtt
1 TItk
v
%4
. • %_.
�9 ! 5t
of Crime Records by National
Code." codes 040000 to 040502
I) its SI
Lissner.