Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/11/88October 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 11, 1988 City Council Meeting APPOINTMENT OP A TEMPORARY SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW INVESTMENT POLICY Recommendation: That the Council appoint a temporary subcommittee to join the City Treasurer and Finance Administrator in reviewing the City's investment policy. Background: Consistent with professional investment procedures, the City Treasurer prepared and recommended an investment policy to the City Council, which was approved in January, 1988. Since that time, several requests from Councilmembers have been made con- cerning what specific investments are allowed under this policy. Analysis: Our City Treasurer, Gary Brutsch, has encouraged the Council to become more knowledgable about the City's investments so that they will be more comfortable with our policy and better able to respond to inquiries. Since lack of knowledge could result in a desire to be more conservative in our investments, it can readily cause tens of thousands of dollars in lost revenue to the City. Accordingly, it is important that the City's policy makers have sufficient information to approve the optimal investment policy for our size city. Staff supports this recommendation in order that the Council and the community be reassured that the application of our investment policy complies with its goals, which are to maintain safety, liquidity and yield. B. or . raft City Manager KBN/ld cc: Gary Brutsch, City Treasurer 12 7.Z7 14-6. ditir Celia 04•401414.4 lte4, /2,44410447j inott!f 8 7 Z". �t 4.4-4404€4W, GaPo %,Le«,o 4vy /79 Q2Zz. tv 0c04,„9�cpa,r a . 7:,14,449‘44.1. C.irccti cc.� _ .41444c..-,..., azoi ' %C'o'Lia.s✓. �� o4OC�!l.P.a _jam” 4+s Ct.s (-eta pAesswAts, -4' /3 October 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 11, 1988 REQUEST FOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR THE "MAMA LIS" THANKSGIVING DINNER Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate from Prospec- tive Expenditures not to exceed $300.00 for transportation ser- vices for the Easy Reader "Mama Liz" Thanksgiving Dinner. Background: Since its inception four years ago, the City has provided transportation service to the Easy Reader's Annual Free ,"Mama Liz" Absolutely Free Thanksgiving Dinner. The attached letter dated September 26, 1988, again requests the City's participa- tion. Last year, the Council approved Resolution No. 87-5077, C establishing its policy to recognize the Easy Reader for this contribution to the welfare of the City and provide the transpor- tation services of the City's transit system not to exceed $300.00. Analysis: The City's policy regarding this developing community tradition seems well established, requiring only an appropriation to main- tain the City's participation. If the appropriation is again approved for this year, it will be included in the budget in the future so that separate action will no longer be required each year. ev n B. or craft City Manager KBN/ld 1i September 26,1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 P.O. Box 726 1233 Hermosa Avenue Hermosa Beach California 90254-0726 (2131 372.4611 SEP 28 1988 i:lty Mgr. UH1G.tf Dear Mayor Rosenberger and City Council, Plans are already underway for the Fifth Annual Free "Mama Liz" Absolutely Free Thanksgiving Dinner, Musical Concert and Variety Show which is held at the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club on Thanksgiving Day. The City of Hermosa Beach, Kiwanis Club, The Comedy and Magic Club, and all the generous volunteer work and financial donations of residents have made it possible for 500 homeless, hungry, or just plain lonesome people to enjoy a day of feast, entertainment and companionship. All of you who have attended the dinner on this special day know how meaningful a tradition has become in Hermosa Beach. Your contribution of providing transportation for guests who could not otherwise attend for the past four years has been greatly appreciated. Once again, we are asking that the City of Hermosa Beach participate by providing the bus. This request for assistance is hopefully coming far enough in advance to allow necessary arrangements to be made if you see fit to join with us in this worthwhile event. If you wish to discuss this with us personally, or if you wish us to provide any materials, please feel free to call upon us. Most appreciatively, Coralie C. Ebey Director of Community Action 1 Reflections from the South Bay 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 8 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 87- 5077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AWARD FOR CONDUCT BENEFICIAL TO THE PUBLIC TO THE EASY READER FOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO A THANKSGIVING DINNER EVENT. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach realizes that members of the public, employees of the City of Hermosa Beach and others often engage In services which are of benefit to the public at large; and WHEREAS, the provision of services to the public should be recognized by those who benefit from such public services, including recognition from the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach and the City of Hermosa Beach where such public services are of benefit to the citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach realizes that the recognition of persons who spend time and effort engaging in services which are of benefit to the public at large will encourage others to engage in public services; and WHEREAS, the City Council has the ability to make awards, pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-6.3, to persons who make demonstrated contributions to the public at large through public employment, volunteer work, public service or other contributions; and WHEREAS, such an award shall reflect the contribution made by the individual or entity but shall not be intended to compensate the individual or entity in questions; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach finds the presentation of such an award compatible with the goals and 1 '1 1 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 purposes of the laws and constitutional provisions of the State of California; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section That the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby recognize the Easy Reader for its contribution to the welfare of the City of Hermosa Beach through its "Thanksgiving Dinner Event." That the City Council does hereby grant the services of the City transit system for the aforementioned event in appreciationto the Easy Reader. That the expenditures resulting from services provided by the City transit system be incurred by the City of Hermosa Beach in recognition for the service provided by the Easy Reader to the citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach. Such award shall be for true and actual expenses not to exceed three hundred dollars ($300.00). 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS 13th DAY OF October 1987. ATTEST: 27 28 COUNCIL AND CITY OF HE I YOR OF THE SA BEACH .., CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence iibthe City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. .C]TY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT a. Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on -certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the . ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports r.City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since• the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on *the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. . { "It takes a lot of luck to make up for a lack of common sense." -Anonymous AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 11, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Jim Rosenberger MAYOR PRO TEM June Williams COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: Dental Hygiene Week, October 16-22, 1988 PRESENTATION OF TROPHY TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FROM THE HER- MOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE "DODGERS" TEAM CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed - 1 - J . ^ will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on September 27, 1988. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive and cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) (e) (f) (g) (h) (7) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Monthly Investment Report for September, 1988. Memoran- dum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated October 3, 1988. Recommendation to approve request for appropriation of recycling funds. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated September 29, 1988. Recommendation to approve County reimbursement agreement for Pier Avenue storm drain extension. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 3, 1988. Request for refund of conditional use permit fees for bicycle rentals at 74 -14th Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 4, 1988. Recommendation to deny claims and refer to City's Claims Administrator the claims of: 1) Bernice Lindo, 1232 Corona, St., represented by Legal Offices of David A. Grey, 1800 No. Vine St., Suite 200, L.A., 90028 - alleged trip & fall on curb. 2) Bernie Winikur, 1232 Corona St., represented by Legal Offices of David A. Grey, 1800 No. Wine St., Suite 200, L.A., 90028 - alleged trip & fall on curb. Recommendation to approve Easy Reader request for City funding of transportation services for the "Mama Liz" Thanksgiving Dinner. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 5, 1988. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Historical Society. Memo- randum from Community Resources Coordinator Mary Rooney dated October 4, 1988. Recommendation to award contract for Community Center Theatre air conditioning, CIP 88-610. Memorandum from (1) (m) Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 3, 1988. A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A YELLOW (20 MINUTE LOADING) ZONE ON LOMA DRIVE FOR HERMOSA BEACH FLORIST SHOP ON PIER AVENUE. For waiver of full reading and adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 27, 1988. A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH STREET SWEEPING HOURS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FROM PIER AVENUE TO ARTESIA BOULEVARD. For waiver of full reading and adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 5, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file information report on City recycling and energy conservation programs. Memo- randum from Cityager Kevin B. Northcraft dated Oc- tober 5, 1988. C Approval of recommendation of Parks, Recreation and Com- munity Resources Advisory Commission to approve the request from the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club to conduct a Christmas Tree sale on the south lawn of the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Coordinator Mary oo y •ate,,d/October 5, 1988. U�/ / Al N �— 2. CON D NANCES. (a) (b) (c) (d) ORDINANCE NO. 88-957 BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 2-63 - 2-68. ORDINANCE NO. 88-958 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HERMOSA ARTICLE V, COMMUNITY RESOURCES, For adoption. - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE II (TITLE) AND SEC- TION 17-50 (GAMES OF CHANCE); SECTION 13-8 (GAMBLING); SECTION 13-14 (GAMBLING); SECTION 29.5-5 (SUBDIVISIONS - PROCEDURE); AND CHAPTER 29, ADDING SECTION 29-18.1 (COSTS OF CONVERSION); PURSUANT TO BOOK PUBLISHING RE- PORT. For waiver of full reading and re -introduction. ORDINANCE NO. 88-959 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREA 3 FROM R-2 TO R -2B. For adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 88-960 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-917 PERTAINING TO THE TIME LIMIT TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. For adoption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter to Mayor from City of West Hollywood received September 20, 1988 regarding County Board of Supervi- sors' position on a program to stop the spread of HIV infection in Los Angeles County. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. PROPOSED EXTENSION AND/OR NEW MORATORIUM FOR MULTI -USE CORRIDOR WITH ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION. For waiver of full reading and adoption. (Requires 4/5 vote). Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 4, 1988. 6. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 19-96 OF HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING THE RATE FOR PARKING METERS IN LOT H (74 -14TH STREET) AT 25 CENTS PER HOUR. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated October 4, 1988. 7. 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT--REDESIGNATING AREAS 9B AND 7 FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND AREA 9C FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DENSITY WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 3, 1988. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES, INC., FOR A CIVIL AND CRIMINAL MEDIATION PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 6, 1988. (Continued from September 27, 1988 meeting.) 9. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF HYDROLOGY REPORT AND CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR AN 8 LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 532, 534-540 20TH STREET (POWER STREET). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 27, 1988. 10. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PROCEDURES FOR RECLASSIFICATIONS AND RECLASSIFICATIONS OF CERTAIN POSITIONS. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 27, 1988. _11. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FOR CONSIDERATION AS THE "MODEL COMMUNITY" FOR A DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SPONSORED RECYCLING PROGRAM. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated October 3, 1988. 12. APPOINTMENT OF A TEMPORARY SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW IN- VESTMENT POLICY. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 4, 1988. 13. RECOMMENDATION TO INCREASE ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS ON CER- TAIN CITY ORDINANCES. Memorandum from City Manager Ke- vin B. Northcraft dated October 5, 1988. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Appointment of Bicentennial Committee. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 6, 1988. 16. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request from Councilmember Williams for discussion of increasing required distance between off -sale alcohol establishments and residentially zoned property. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (b) Request from Councilmember Williams for discussion re. delay in enforcing alcohol conditional use permits. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. (c) Request by Councilmember Williams for clarification of adult video restrictions in C-2 area. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. 17. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, September 27, 1988 at the hour of 7:40 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding litigation Wilhite v. Hermosa Beach, Gotanda v. Hermosa Beach; Personnel Meet & Confer; Real Property Negoitiations re: Railroad right-of-way; held at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: Williams PLEADGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Sheldon ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Williams Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger PROCLAMATIONS Fire Safety Week, October 9 - October 15, 1988 PRESENTATION BY HERMOSA JAYCEES South Bay Reserve Coordinating Assn. Annual Reserve Outstanding Young Public Safety Officer for 1988 Jaycees President Diane McKennan presented the award reserve officers, and to Public Safety officer Brian CITIZEN COMMENTS None Shoot -Off to the Scott. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (p) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (f) Sheldon, (h) Sheldon, (j) Rosenberger, (k) Creighton, (n) Sheldon, and (o) Sheldon. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on September 13, 1988. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 27537 and 27681 through 27839 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 27692, 27693, 27694 and 27743. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the August, 1988 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Reports; 2) City Treasurer's Report 1 la Minutes 9-27-88 (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Recommendation to approve award of bid - Hermosa Avenue/ Pier Avenue Street Light Poles (CIP 85-202). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated Septem- ber 19, 1988. Action: To award bid for 22 marbelite poles for the Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue Street Light Poles (CIP 85- 202) to Triad Sales in the amount of $14,506.55, and to authorize staff to issue a purchase order to Triad Sales. Recommendation to receive and file informational update on planned withdrawal from the South Bay Regional Com- munications Authority. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated September 19, 1988. Supplemental attachment from Public Safety Director. Public Safety Director Wisniewski gave a staff report on this item. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. Recommendation to approve amendment to agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the County of Los Angeles for participation in the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Data Justice Interface Controller System, and authoriza- tion to purchase equipment necessary for the interface. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated September 12, 1988. Action: Approve the amendment to the original agree- ment, and authorize the Mayor's signature, and approve and authorize the purchase of the equipment necessary for the interface of the City computer system with the Sheriff's data system. ($3,371.50, already budgeted) Recommendation to approve removal of "appeal" sign in City Council Chambers. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 19, 1988. Action: That a new sign be prepared per the City Man- ager's recommendation #2: That most actions of commis- sions are appealable to the City Council with informa- tion available in the City Clerk's and City Manager's offices. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the objection of Simpson and the absence of Williams. Recommendation to reschedule first November City Council meeting to Wednesday, November 9, 1988 due to Presiden- tial Election. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Mid- stokke dated September 20, 1988. 2 Minutes 9-27-88 (j) (k) (1) (m) (n) Recommendation from the Cable TV Board re. the hiring of a CATV consultant. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated September 19, 1988. Action: A Consumer Protection Ordinance for Cable TV be developed and drafted; a consultant, in cooperation with the CATV Board, assist the CATV Board in drafting a Con- sumer Protection Ordinance to improve Hermosa Beach's service and also to do other activities required by the CATV Board; and with the approval of the City Council, the CATV Board be authorized to recommend a consultant of their choice. Motion Rosenberger, second Creigton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. Recommendation to award contract for fire flow study and appropriate an amount not to exceed $9,700 from Prospec- tive Expenditures. Memorandum from Public Safety Di- rector Steve Wisniewski dated August 25, 1988. Action: To award the contract to Phenix Technology, Inc. and appropriate an amount not to exceed $9,700 from Fire Protection Fund to pay for the study, and subject to a contract approved by the City Attorney. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. Recommendation to accept work as complete - concrete street repairs, CIP 85-160. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated August 30, 1988. Action: To accept as complete CIP 85-160, Concrete Street Repairs; authorize staff to: release the 10% retention payment from Ruiz Engineering Co, release Ruiz Engineering from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond; increase the contract Not to Exceed amount for this project by $5,054.50; authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion. Recommendation to accept Hermosa Beach Pavilion Grant Deeds. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 19, 1988. Action: To accept the grant deed for the 10' sanitary sewer easement along the west property line adjacent to the Commodore Condominiums; accept the grant deed for the 12' street widening on 16th Street. Recommendation to authorize termination of contract for bicycle path repair, CIP 87-165. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 20, 1988. Action: To table this item. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. 3 Minutes 9-27-88 (o) Recommendation to approve contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar Associa- tion, Dispute Resolution Services, Inc., for a civil and criminal mediation program. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian dated September 20, 1988. Addressing the council on this item were: Lauren Burton, Director of Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. and Lance Widman who has worked with the program. Action: To continue this item to the next meeting. (Council has concerns regarding budget.)Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. (p) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #19557 FOR 2 -UNIT CON- DOMINIUM LOCATED LOCATED AT. 722 NINTH STREET. For adop- tion. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 19, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5184, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #19557 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger. NOES - None ABSENT - Williams 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE V, COMMUNITY RESOURCES, SECTIONS 2-63 - 2-68. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated September 20, 1988. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 88-958 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMO- SA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY CODE ARTICLE V. COM- MUNITY RESOURCES SECTIONS 2-63 THROUGH 2.68 INCLUSIVE, CHANGING THE NAME OF THE COMMUNITY RESOURCES COMMISSION TO PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger. NOES - None ABSENT - Williams 4 Minutes 9-27-88 c (b) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE II (TITLE) AND SECTION 17-50 (GAMES OF CHANCE); SECTION 13-8 (GAMBLING); SECTION 13-14 (GAM- BLING); SECTION 29.5-5 (SUBDIVISIONS -PROCEDURE); AND CHAPTER 29, ADDING SECTION 29-18.1 (COSTS OF CONVER- SION); PURSUANT TO BOOK PUBLISHING REPORT. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated September 19, 1988. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance - No. 88- 958 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE II (TITLE); SECTION 17-50; SECTION 13-8; SECTION 13-14; SECTION 29.5-5; AND ADDING SECTION 29-18.1; TO ESTABLISH AND CLARIFY PROCEDURES REGARDING GAMES OF CHANCE, GAM- BLING, APPEALING DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON TENTATIVE MAPS, AND COSTS OF CONVERSION OF UTILITY FACILITIES." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None ABSENT - Williams 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Consent Calendar items (f), (h), (j), (k), (n), and (o) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. A recess was called at 8:48 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:02 P.M. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC None PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. PROPOSED REZONE OF AREA 3 FROM R-2 TO R -2B OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 19, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Minutes 9-27-88 Garrison Frost - 2900 Tennyson P1 - property owner in area affected - requested that it be left R-2 Francis Ford - owner 610/612 Longfellow - requested that it remain R-2 Mr. Stone - 634 Longfellow - requested retention of the R-2 designation Emmett Manion - 633 Longfellow - retain R-2 Warren Ford - owner 610/612 Longfellow - opposes change The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To rezone Area 3 from R-2 to R -2B, and to waiver full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 88- 959, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREA 3 AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None ABSENT - Williams MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. REQUEST OF MICHAEL AND CASSANDRA LAWTON FOR EXTENSION TO PERMIT DEADLINE OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-917 AND CONSIDER- ATION OF APPLICATION FEE WAIVER. Memorandum from Build- ing and Safety Director William Grove dated September 20, 1988. The staff report was presented by Building Director Wil- liam Grove. Addressing the council on this item was Michael Lawton. Action: To waive full reading of OrdinanceNo. 88-960, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-917 PERTAINING TO THE TIME LIMIT TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT." Motion Creighton, second Simpson. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None ABSENT - Williams Further Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-960. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None ABSENT - Williams Proposed Further Action: To split the fees with Mr. Lawton because of the joint responsiblity of the prob- lems with this project. Motion Sheldon - dies for lack of second. 6 - Minutes 9-27-88 7. Final Action: To deny the fee waiver. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None ABSENT - Williams PROPOSED STOP SIGN RESOLUTION AND INSTALLATION OF NEW STOP SIGNS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 12, 1988. The staff report was presented by Public Works Director Anthony Antich. City Attorney Lough explained that this is a safety type action and under California Environmental Act it is cat- egorically exempt. Also, coucil is relying on the ad- vise of an expert, and it is presumptive that it is correct. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5185, entitiled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, AMENDING N.S. 2435 AS AMENDED BY ESTABLISHING ,STOP INTERSECTIONS THOUGHTOUT THE CITY."; appropriate $10,000 from the State Gas Tax Fund; to delete item # 3 (council go out into community for imput and come back to staff regarding stop sign removal) Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. 8. REQUEST FROM MARINELAND MOBILE HOME PARK RESIDENTS FOR REAFFIRMATION REGARDING FUTURE USES OF MOBILE HOME PARK ZONED AREAS. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 21, 1988. The staff report was presented by City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft. Action: That the City Council direct staff to act in a facilitator role to assure the preservation of the prin- cipally senior and low -to -moderate income mobile home park neighborhood located at 531 Pier Avenue. Motion Simpson, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. 9. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE EXTENSION OF DRILLING TIME LIMIT OF OIL LEASE WITH MACPHERSON OIL COMPANY. Memo- randum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated Sep- tember 22, 1988. The staff report was presented by City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft. - 7 - Minutes 9-27-88 Action: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an amendment to the oil lease with Macpherson Oil Company providing for a one-year extension of the time limit contained in the original lease for commencement of drilling. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. 10. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT ON CITY COUN- CIL FIRE FLOW SUB -COMMITTEE. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated September 20, 1988. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Simpson, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) (b) (c) (d) City Attorney comments re. legality of Proposition 62. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 19, 1988. Action: To receive and file. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. School Board -Council Subcommittee - for purpose of EIR on oil drilling and use of school site for use of equip- ment from relocated City Yard. Action: To reinstitute this subcommittee for the above purposes, delegates being Creighton and Simpson. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. Mens Miller Lite US Professional Volleyball Tournament - City Manager Northcraft reported getting positive feed- back, orderly crowds, city fees of $8,300 plus sales tax and parking revenue. Staff was directed to work with the association of volleyball professionals in order to reduce what many felt were outlandish comments by the announcer during the bathing suit contest, and that such things are not tolerated. Coastal Permit Biltmore Site - it is being recommended administratively for extention since it is an option on the November, 1988 ballot. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) City Council/Planning Commission Workshop, October 5, 1988. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 21, 1988. 8 Minutes 9-27-88 Action: To reschedule items 3, 4, 5, and 6. To make Density Reduction Update item # 1. Leave # 1; change # 2 to Multi -Use Corridor; and # 7; to add the Land Use Element of the General Plan Update 1989; and an item for possible other items for discussion. Agenda as follows: 1. Density Reduction Update 2. 17 Foot Setback 3. Multi -Use Corridor/ Pacific Coast Highway 4. General Plan Land Use Element 1989 5. Noise Enforcement Downtown 6. Possible other items for discussion 7. Discussion of next meeting Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) .Request from Councilmember Williams for discussion of increasing required distance between off -sale alcohol establishments and residentially zoned property. Action: To continue this item. (Due to the absence of Williams) Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the absence of Williams. 14. ••CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California adjourned on Tuesday, September 27, 1988 at the hour of 10:28 P.M. to a Special Meeting for the purpose of having a workshop with the Planning Commission on Wednesday, October 5, 1988 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. City Clerk 9 Minutes 9-27-88 r _ • _ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 H 1PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 H , PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. - RETIRMENT/AUG 88 • 11 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 --- • • - H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00240 09/26/88 RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00241 09/26/88 RETIREMENT - 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00079 09/26/88 STREET LIGHTING 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00079 09/26/88 VEH PKG DIST -- 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00079 09/26/88 PARKING ENF 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00052 09/26/88 DIAL A RIDE - -- 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00052 09/26/88 ESEA 14 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 ---RETIRMENT/AUG 88 09/26/88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. • RETIRMENT/AUG 88 • v H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIRMENT/AUG 88 - H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -----RETIRMENT/AUG 88 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************** 00026 09/26/88 145-400-3403-4180 00003 BUS PASS SUBSDY 155-400-2102-4180 00052 CROSSING GUARD 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00079 09/26/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN - 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00003 - 09/26/88 - LIABILITY INS SYS. 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00003 -09/26/88 WORKERS COMP - $73, 544. 55 /RETIREMENT $74, 467. 42CR /RETIREMENT $688. 29 /RETIREMENT $169. 01 /RETIREMENT $4,197.50 /RETIREMENT $148.07 -/RETIREMENT $50. 24 /RETIREMENT $15.04 -/RETIREMENT- $232.92 /RETIREMENT $778. 23 /RETIREMENT $117.64 /RETIREMENT -- INV/REF AMOUNT PAGE 0001 DATE 10/06/88 PO # CHK UNENC DATE EXP 27840 $0. 00 10/05/88 27840 $0.00• 10/05/88 27840 $0. 00 10/05/88 27840 10/05/88 27840 $0. 00 10/05/88 27840 $0.00 -. 10/05/88 27840 $0. 00 10/05/88 27840 ---- $0.00 --- 10/05/88 27840 . • - - $0. 00 - 10/05/88 27840 • 10/05/88 27840 $0. 00 10/05/88 $166. 19 27840 - /RETIREMENT - $0.00 -10/05/88 **************************************************** $5•640.26 H SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. 00824 705-400-1217-4182 00072 $18,265.27 07011 27841 REIMB WORK COMP/AUG 88 09/27/88 WORKERS COMP --/WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR-'-------- $0.00 -10/05/88 - H SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. 00824 705-400-1217-4183 00052 $5,059.90 07011 27841 REIMB WORK COMP/AUG 88 /WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR $0.00 10/05/88 09/27/88 WORKERS COMP 404 I c 44 44 44 44 1, 44 44 • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002 •, TIME 10:58:12 FOR 10/11/88 DATE 10/06/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $23. 325.17 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $28,965.43 R ACTION DOOR REPAIR 02323 001-400-8604-4201 00079 $4.800.00 14810REV 05342 27846 FIRE DEPT GARAGE DOOR 10REV 09/27/88 CIP 86-604 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4,800.00 R ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00272 $80.00 20564 00003 27847 ELEV MAINT/OCT 88 20564 10/01/88 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00571 $168.00 00093 27848 MISC CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $168.00 R ANPAT ELECTRIC 02492 001-400-2201-4311 00240 $47.93 1777 05373 27849 BATTERY CHARGER REPAIR 1777 09/26/88 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $47. 93 R ASPA INSURANCE PLANS 02218 001-400-1212-4188 01182 $56.00 7505-0500415 06629 27850 DISAB INS/CITY MANAGER 00415 10/05/88 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $56.00 R ASPLUNDH 00487 105-400-2601-4311 00113 $625.72 72338 06722 27851 ANNUAL INSP/BOOM TRUCK 72338 09/21/88 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 10/05/88 ***VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $625.72 R AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER 01891 001-400-3104-4309 . 00040 $349.43 00094 27852 MISC CHGS/SEP 88 09/30/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .. $0.00 10/05/88 • • • • • • • • IIv FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANC ONE LEASING 99 LEASE PMT/OCT 88 PAGE 0003 DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $349.43 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00016 4417.96 10/01/88 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANK OF HEMET LEASE-PMT/PD COMPUTER.. 4417. 96 00549 001-400-2101-6900 00351 $15,169.00 -."._10/01/88 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS "" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANNER SIGN COMPANY BANNER/PUBLIC HEARING $15.169.00 00834 001-400-4601-4305 00549 431.95 - 09/21/88 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES"- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS -- STREET PAINT...............35974,.-- R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS. PAINT RIG SUPPLIES 35975 00251 001-400-3104-4309 00039 09/20/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00251 105-400-2601-4309 00388 09/20/88 STREET LIGHTING $31.95 00054 27853 $0.00 10/05/88 00038 27B54. 40. 00 10/05/88 06557 27855 --- $0.00 40.00 10/05/88 " .. $846.69 35974 06733 27856 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS- --.- ". " -._.. $0.00 " " 10/05/88 $161.83 35975 06742 27856 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BEACH TRAVEL AIRFARE ADV/J. WILLIAMS TR211 00252 001-400-1101-4317 00272 10/05/88 CITY COUNCIL $1,008.52 $68.00 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $68.00 R BIG D FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES WALL BASES 85513 00846 001-400-4204-4309. 01089 $128.44 09/25/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4128.44 R BIOCYCLE • PUBLICATIONS/BLDG 02491 001-400-4201-4305 00343 436.00 09/20/88 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES TR211 00211 27857 $0.00 10/05/88 85513 06744 27858 i $0.00 10/05/88 04985 27859 $0.00 10/05/88 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 10:58:12 FOR 10/11/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 DATE 10/06/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $36.00 R JIM*BLICKENSDERFER 01303 001-400-4601-4201 00235 $56.00 06554 27860 TECH SERV/9-19-88 --- 09/22/88 - COMM RESOURCES -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT-""""--.--""-_. '$0.00 10/05/88 .. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $56.00 R BOA ARCHITECTURE 01744 001-400-4202-4201 00217 $85.75 10745 06795 27861 PROF SERV/NEEDS ASSESSMT 10745 - 08/31/88 - PUB WKS ADMIN -`/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $85.75 R BUCK'S BODY & FENDER 00420 001-400-4201-4311 00142 $229.60 3294 04981 27862 - BLDG VEHICLE REPAIR --.---3294 - 09/08/88 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE - 30.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $229.60 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 00001 $3,000.00 8090071 00061 27863. ----PARKS - ARKS MAINT/SEP 88 - -- - -- 90071 - � ---- 09/30/88 -- --- MEDIANS - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT -` $0.00 - 10/05/88 -- -- R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. 00599. 001-400-6101-4201 00124 $8.710.00 8090071 00061 27863 PARKS MAINT/SEP 88 90071 09/30/88 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/05/88 r - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $11.710.00 R CABLE TV INFORMATION CENTER 00376 001-400-1205-4315 00024 $200.00 88-1171 06919 27864 DUES/SEP 88- SEP 89 -1171 09/16/88 CABLE TV /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00 R CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 00262 001-400-1101-4305 00201 $48.99 26493 04555- 27865 -STAMPS/CITY CLERK 26493 09/26/88 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $48.99 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE - WATER BILLS/SEP 88 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00010 $2.083.89 00099 27866 09/30/88 - MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 10/05/88 I 411, 411. • • 4/1 411, OOP MEI 11/ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLS/SEP 88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLS/SEP 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00016 09/30/88 00016 09/30/88 001-400-4204-4303 00258 BLDG MAINT 001-400-6101-4303 00219 PARKS $578.32 /UTILITIES $1,338.13 /UTILITIES W PAGE 0005 y DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF • PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOf TOTAL******************************************************************* $4,000.34 R CALPELRA - REG/R. BLACKWOOD . -- - �- - - TR218 01616 001-400-1203-4317 00035 $175.00 10/04/88 PERSONNEL - /CONFERENCE EXPENSE- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY • MOBILE PHONE CHGS/AUG 88 78425 $175.00 02449 001-400-2101-4304 00286 $81.87 08/27/88 POLICE "./TELEPHONE _- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHCS/SEP 88 ------------ 00014 -------------- 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00553 09/30/88 POLICE"- " • 00099 27866 $0.00 10/05/88 00099 27866 $0.00 -. 10/05/88 " TR218 00218 27867 $0.00 -.. 10/05/88 . - .. 178428/178425 00810 27868 --- • $0.00 -10/05/88 $81.87 $212.24 00912 27869 /AUTO MAINTENANCE ------------ $0. 00- 10/05/88 -- *** 0/05/88 " —'i *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CIRCLE 8 MOTOR INN - HOTEL ADV/ROSENBERGER --" TR210 02504 001-400-1101-4317 00269 10/05/88 CITY COUNCIL $212.24 $144.45 TR210 00210 27870 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE_ $0.00 - 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $144.45 R CIRCLE 8 MOTOR INN ----- --HOTEL ADV/WILLIAMS ---- -- . TR211 02506 001-400-1101-4317 00271 --"10/05/88 CITY COUNCIL $192.60 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE- -- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COAST GLASS COMPANY - MISC. CHCS/SEP 88- --- $192. 60 00325 001-400-4204-4309 01088 $143.20 09/30/88 - BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $143.20 TR211 00211 27871 - $0.00 "" 10/05/88 00914 27872 $0.00 -- 10/05/88 R THE*DAILY BREEZE 00642 001-400-1122-4201 00158 $116.88 99534-00 04556 27873 -- LEGAL AD/NOV ELECTION--"-- 34-00 ---•"-- - 09/29/88 - - ELECTIONS - -"./CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - .- . -.-._- _ $0. 00 - • 10/05/88 -_. y w .s. St FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************•n***********►********************************** PAGE 0006 DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $116.88 R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00448 $93.50 38615 00047 27874 - TAPE STORAGE/AUG12-SEP11 38615 09/12/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00" 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R M. 0. *DION & SONS, INC. ' GAS PURCHASE/CITY YARD 74-75 09/28/88 00085 001-141-0000-1401 $93. 50 00008 $3.924.19 59055/59374-75 06791 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** DUN & BRADSTREET SEM REG/C. HASSANALLY $3,924.19 00658 - 001-400-1203-4316 00139 $99.00 .- 10/03/88 PERSONNEL - /TRAINING .._.-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EASY READER -- PUBLIC NOTICES/AUG 88 --- 0268-- EASY 268 - EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICES/AUG 88 R EASY READER ---EMP ADS/PERSONNEL 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00035 08/31/88 - CITY CLERK 00181 001-400-1122-4201 00159 0268 08/31/88 ELECTIONS 00181 001-400-1203-4201 00384 1719 - 09/30/88 PERSONNEL $99.00 27875 10/05/88 " 07012 27876 -$0.00 10/05/88- $705.10 0/05/88- $705.10 0268 04558 27877 /PUBLIC NOTICING -- -- — $0.00 10/05/88 $28. 60 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 0268 04558 27877 $0.00 10/05/88 $40.00 1719 07009 27877 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $773.70 R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY LEASE PMT/OCT 88 -- 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00008 -10/01/88 ST MAINTENANCE $1,736.78 /LEASE PAYMENTS - *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************** **************************• ********************** • $1,736.78 • R MAXINE*FANCHER 02497- 001-210-0000-2110 --- ANIMAL TRAP REFUND- - - -- 65503 ----- 09/29/88 $0.00._ 10/05/88 00060 27878 $0.00 10/05/88 - 1" 02464 $50.00 65503 07104 27879 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS SEWER RODS -- 01207 160-400-3102-4309 00306 $1,143.81 14552 06762 27880 -14552 ----- 09/21/88 - - SEWER/ST DRAIN ---/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS- -- . .. - $0.00 -10/05/88 `--.- 41. • elo FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******w********************************************************air*ter R FOUNTAINS SUITE HOTEL 02499 HOTEL ADV/L. LICKHALTER 'TR217 ..-.-. 09/29/88 PAGE 0007 DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.143.81 001-400-2201-4316 00140 $60.09 FIRE /TRAINING *** VENDoq TOTAL******************************************************************** R 0. A. *FROST 02496 001-210-0000-2110 ANIMAL' TRAP REFUND -_ - - 65477 09/29/88 $60.09 TR217 00217 27881 -- *0.00 10/05/88 .. 02463 *50.00 65477 07103 27882 • /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE--- $0.00 _... 10/05/88 -. *** VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************************************** R GENE AUTRY HOTEL *50.00 02501 001-400-1205-4317 00031 $110.00 TR216 00216 27883 HOTEL ADV/M. TERCERO TR216 ....... 10/01/88 CABLE TV /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *0.00 - 10/05/88 " *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY f ----- - .. MISC. CHGS/SEP 88- -- . i . r v I R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC. CHCS/SEP 88 00058 09/30/88 00058 09/30/88 *110. 00 001-400-4204-4321 00380 *187.44 00924 BLDG MAINT . -._./BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT---T".".. $0.00- 105-400-2601-4309 00390 *425.98 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/SEP 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - TELE CHCS/SEP 88 -. - ---.--- GENERAL -----..--- GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/SEP 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ---TELE CHCS/SEP 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY -TELE CHCS/SEP 88 00015 09/30/88 00015 09/30/88 001-400-1101-4304 00182 *613. 42 *6. 74 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 001-400-1121-4304 00172 *38. 78 CITY CLERK -..-/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00111 *208.06 .. 09/30/88 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00175 09/30/88 - CITY TREASURER 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00189 09/30/88 CITY MANAGER 27884 10/05/88— •00924 27884 30. 00 10/05/88 -- " 00925 27886 *0.00 10/05/88 00925 27886 _._----___--. *0.00.- 10/05/88 00925 27886 *0.00 10/05/88 $32.03 00925 27886 /TELEPHONE ---------- $0.00---10/05/88 *35.41 00925 27886 /TELEPHONE .. *0.00 10/05/88 — • 0 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10: 58:12 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 PAGE -0008 DATE 10/06/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00193 $53.96 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00191 '$50.58 00925 27886 -TELE CHCS/SEP 88 -- ----- 09/30/88 PERSONNEL ------/TELEPHONE------"- --'---- $0.00 -- 10/05/88 R QENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00121 $197.42 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00097 $42.81 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 - ---- 09/30/88-- BUS LICENSE -. /TELEPHONE ----------------------- $0.00.- 10/05/88 R GENERALTELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00285 $618.05 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00128 $195.59 00925 27886 -TELE CHCS/SEP 88 -- - 09/30/88 - FIRE /TELEPHONE -- --. ---- ---------" -----$0.00. "10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00180 $33.72 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 -- ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE $0.00 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00194 $118.04 00925 27886 - TELE CHCS/SEP 88' ------- - 09/30/88 -- - - PLANNING --/TELEPHONE --------------- ---- $0.00- 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00191 $210.77 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 BUILDING /TELEPHONE - $0.00 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00194 $310.21 00925 27886 • TELE CHCS/SEP 88 ._ • - - ---- -- - - 09/30/88- - ' PUB WKS ADMIN -/TELEPHONE ----- --------- $0.00 --10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00381 $18.35 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $0.00 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00217 $258.10- 00925 ' 27886 -----TELE CHOS/SEP 88 ----- --- --- 09/30/88 -- -- -- COMM RESOURCES - _/TELEPHONE ---"---" - ----------------- $0.00-10/05/88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/SEP 88 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00111 $1.70 09/30/88 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00925 27886 $0.00 10/05/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 110-400-3301-4304 00091 $30.24 00925 27886 - -- - -TELE CHCS/SEP 88 -- ----------- -09/30/88 -- .VEH PKG DIST -.-/TELEPHONE. - $0.00-"--- 10/05/88 "--- R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00191 $116.04 - TELE CHCS/SEP 88 - 09/30/88 PARKINQ ENF /TELEPHONE 00925 27886 $0.00 10/05/88 d 0 410. 411. ti w .. __.. _ _._ ._ __. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 10:58:12 FOR 10/11/88 PAGE 0009 DATE 10/06/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK A DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00012 $4:16 00925 27886 TELE CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************+r******* $2,580.76 r R TEL 01340 001-202-0000-2020 00776 $148.30 PC00538 05203 27887 ANSWERING MACHINE 00538 08/18/88 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R VELMA*HAZEN 02057 001-210-0000-2110 02465 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 50385 09/29/88 $148.30 $50.00 50385 07105 27888 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE 00820 001-400-4601-4201 00236 $1.725.00 06558 27889 ANNUAL PMT/FY 87-88 09/29/88 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT" - $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _. $1,725.00 R ALEX*HERNANDEZ 02493 001-400-4101-4316 00122 $290.48 06050 27890 REIMB FALL TUITION 09/30/88 PLANNING /TRAINING $0.00 10/05/88 . *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $290.48 r.... r ▪ ; ✓ R ELIZABETH JANE*HOFF 02494 110-300-0000-3302 23795 CITE PMT REFUND 18195 09/29/88 $18.00 118195 06938 27891 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18.00 • R INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE 00068 001-400-1208-4201 00486 $463.49 98W3121 06290 27892 METER USE/MAINT/JUL/OCT W3121 09/16/88 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $463.49 R JONCICH, STURM & ASSOCIATES 02159 001-400-8606-4201 00035 $2,002.25 1026 06799 27893 PROF SERV/PD REMODEL - 1026 07/21/88 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE $0.00 10/05/88 Pi i FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND tF ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R KELLY PAPER COMPANY COPIER PAPER/STOCK 01324 PAGE 0010 DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF PO * CHK M' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $2,002.25 00212 001-400-1208-4305 00561 $1,062.87 09/22/88 GEN APPROP -/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEALS/ROSENBERGER TR210 R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEALS/WILLIAMS TR211 02505 001-400-1101-4317 00268 10/05/88 CITY COUNCIL 02505 001-400-1101-4317 00270 10/05/88 CITY COUNCIL $1,062.87 $17.50 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $17.50 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $35.00 R LEE*LICKHALTER PER DIEM ADVANCE R LEE*LICKHALTER 00665 001-400-2201-4316 00139 TR217 09/29/88 FIRE 00665 001-400-2201-4316 AIR ADV/L. LICKHALTER - TR217 09/29/88 FIRE $100.00 /TRAINING 00141 $38.00 /TRAINING - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JAMES P. *LOUGH -- EXTRA LEGAL/SEP 88 - - 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00421 09/30/88 CITY ATTORNEY 101324 06288 27894 - $0.00._ 10/05/88 - TR210 00210 27895 $0.00 10/05/88 - TR211 00211 27895 $0.00 10/05/88 TR217 00217 27896 $0.00 10/05/88 TR217 00217 —------------ -- -- $0.00 $138. 00 27896 10/05/88' $952.00 06631 27897 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT--.-.---.-...—.. $0.00 10/05/88 --- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. -- MISC CHCS/SEP 88 - - - ---21420 00079 001-400-2101-4187 09/30/88 POLICE $952.00 00207 $79.88 121420 00934 27898 --/UNIFORM ALLOWANCE----------- — $0.00 -10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MISC CHCS/JUL 88 -- -- -- - - - - R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MISC CHCS/JUL 88 na, 00388 001-400-2101-4310 —. 09/09/88-- POLICE 00388 001-400-2201-4310 09/09/88 FIRE $79.88 00149 $13.02 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES ------- 00074 $37.71 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 06289 27899 10/05/88-- 06289 0/05/88-- 06289 27899 $0.00 10/05/88 0 0 0 • Alt ve K• • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 FOR 10/11/88 DATE 10/06/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 001-400-2401-4310 00045 $17.39 06289 27899 MISC CHGS/JUL 88 09/09/88 ANIMAL CONTROL /MOTOR FUELS AND LURES $0.00 10/05/88 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 110-400-3302-4310 00073 $54.42 06289 27899 MISC CHCS/JUL 88 09/09/88 PARKING ENF /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES - $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************•************eta•************•** i $122.54 R MONAHAN'S CUSTOM CANVAS 02151 001-400-2201-4309 00546 $79.88 3187 05355 27900 LADDER COVERS/FIRE _--- 3187 10/05/88 -. FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ----- - --- .$0.00'" 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $79.88 R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00724 $617.70 00938 27901 09/30/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - - $0.00.."-10/05/88 ." MISC. CHCS/SEP 88 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $617.70. mho v R NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS 02203 001-400-4201-4316 00127 $59.00 04972 27902 _ SEM REG/C. MORROW 10/03/88 " BUILDING /TRAINING ..... ... *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $59.00 - 10/05/88 - R NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC 00399 001-400-2201-4305 00231 345.98 0120268 05365 27903 -- ----FIRE PREV PACKAGE ...- .- 20268----- 09/19/88.. - - FIRE .- .__/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES- -- ----$0.00- 10/05/88" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $45.98 R NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC 02490 001-400-4201-4315 00074 $60.00 DUES/B. GROVE - ------09/28/88 BUILDING -/MEMBERSHIP — — $0.00 --10/05/88 IOW 04986 27904 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************#************************************************* $60.00 R KEVIN B.*NORTHCRAFT 02064 001-400-1201-4317 00149 $16.00 - MON EXP/SEP 88 - 09/30/88-- .. - CITY MANAGER ........ /CONFERENCE EXPENSE-------- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $16.00 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00287 $134.59 COMP HOOKUP/SEP 88 -------- 09/30/88--- POLICE . ' . ----/TELEPHONE 06632 27905 —.. $0.00 - 10/05/88 10/05/88 - ' 00036 27906 10/05/88---- • 0/05/88- _...- • I -"CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH-- .. '""" - "" - FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0013 TIME 10:58:12 FOR 10/11/88 - -. DATE 10/06/88 y _ PAY VENDOR NAME! -- -- - 3 VND 'S�' ACCOUNT ,NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION(-.- -- DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R RADIO SHACK 01429 105-400-2601-4309 00389 $8.50 MISC. CHCS/SEP 88 09/30/88 INV/REF ' PO # CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ***. VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $139.79 00943 27912 $0.00 10/05/88 R READICARE MEDICAL GROUP -LAX 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00212 $358.00 94-16628 07013 27913 MED SERV/AUG 88 16628 - 09/15/88 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $359.00 R REGISTRAR -RECORDER 00225 001-202-0000-2020 00777 $8,630.76 309-D 04539 27914 ELECTION COST/JUN 7,88 309-D 09/15/88 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8.630.76 R VICTOR*RODAS 01935 001-400-8604-4201 00081` $2.525.10 06728 27915 REPAIR STAGE 09/27/88 CIP 86-604 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,525.10 R S & J SALES 02500 001-400-8606-4201 00036 $2.982.00 10451/52 06848 27916 ELEC SYSTEM/PD REMODEL 51/52 07/20/88 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.982.00 • R MICHAEL*SCHUBACH 00536 001-400-4101-4316 00121 $10.00 06051 27917 MON EXP/SEP 88 - 09/30/88 PLANNING /TRAINING $0.00 10/05/88 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $10.00 - - - - - -I R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01086 465.82 00946 27918 `/ MISC. CHGS/SEP 88 09/30/88 BLDG MAINT - /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ... . $0.00 10/05/88 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-6101-4309 00573 $53.08 00946 27918 --MISC.-CMS/SEP 88 -------- - 09/30/88 -.._ . .. - PARKS . _. ..--/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS- ----"-- $0.00 --10/05/88 - -"--{ 1 . r .✓ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $118.90 R SO BAY RESERVE COORDINATORS 02342 001-400-2101-4316 00274 $100.00 r --------- RES OFCRS SHOOTOUT FEE - -.... -------- 09/28/88-- - POLICE - - - /TRAINING 06867 27919 $0.00 - 10/05/88.." _.1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************w************************************** PAGE 0014 DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF PO it CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $100. 00 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00023 $388.00 BUS PASS SALES/AUG 88 44990- - - 09/07/88 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOff TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOCO-WESTERN CHEMICAL CORP. EPDXY/FISHING PIER 59440 - $388. 00 44990 06923 27920 $0.00" - 10/05/88 02503 001-400-3104-4309 00043 $287.55 59440 06773 • 27921 09/16/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- ----. - - ---$0.00-- 10/05/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE SURCHARGE/SEP 88 ---- $287. 55 00118 110-300-0000-3302 23797 $17.214.00 10/03/88 - ,... /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT -COURT BAIL- - - - - - - - - ----- _. 00400 110-300-0000-3302 09/29/88 - $17.214. 00 06293 27922 $0.00 -10/05/88 23796 $542.00 06939 27923 - /COURT FINES/PARKING - - $0.00---10/05/88----7 I *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. • MON-GAS BILLS/SEP 88 - - - $542. 00 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00257 $334.06 - 09/30/88- - - BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHLAND SPRINKLERS. INC. -- --SPRINKLERS/THEATER -1 02502 001-400-8604-4201 00080 -09/25/88- CIP 86-604 $334. 06 00953 27924 $0.00 ` 10/05/88 -. r IRO $1.095.00 1 05749 '27925 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT--------_-_- $0.00 10/05/88 - v *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 $1, 095. 00 001-400-2101-4305 00814 $71.35 843205 00033 - -- WATER COOLER RENT/AUG 88 43205 -----08/31/88 • - R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 WATER COOLER RENT/AUG 88 84136 08/31/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 - 001-400-4204-4201 00271 BLDG MAINT 27926 10/05/88- ! $36.10 884136 00033 27926 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/05/88 1' 110 ;40- FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/AUG 88 50299 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00146 001-400-4601-4305 00548 08/31/88• COMM RESOURCES PAGE 0015 DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF PO * CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $64.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPEARS APPLIANCE SERVICE REFRIG. REPAIR/FIRE 12919 02488 001-400-2201-4309 00545 09/07/88 FIRE $171.45 $56.99 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL•*****************************•*************************************** R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEPING SERV/SEP 88 2285 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEPING SERV/SEP 88 2285 $56.99 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00185 $2,876.00 09/30/88 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00180 09/30/88 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT---....__ -" - $0.00-- 10/05/88 -- 850299 00033 27926 $0.00 10/05/88 12919 05369 27927 $0.00 10/05/88 2285, 00029 27928 $0.00 10/05/88 $3,552.00 2285 00029 27928 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FRANCIS E.*SPRATLEY CITE PMT REFUND - - --- - 95027---- 02508 5027---.. 02508 110-300-0000-3302 10/03/88--... .. $6,428.00 1 23794 $17.00 95027 06295 27929 --/COURT-FINES/PARKING -- "' 30. 00 _ 10/05/88 " `1 $17.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING -PARTS CLEANER 00180 --_" 00110 001-400-4205-4309 00304 $120.26 8300180 06741 09/14/88 - EQUIP SERVICE -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 0120.26 R CAROLE*STOKEM 02498 001-210-0000-2110 02466 -- DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 64108 ---= 09/29/88 27930 _10/05/88 $100.00 64108 07106 • 27931 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE __- -- $0.00 ._.--10/05/88 --- 1 i *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100. 00 R SUCCESS BUILDERS 02012 110-400-3302-4316 00132 $48.00 • - SEM REG/M... TERCERO---------- -- ---- 09/28/88 PARKING ENF - _._-/TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $48.00 R SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 00425 001-400-2201-4309 MISC CHCS/SEP 88-------- -------09/30/88---- 09/30/88 - FIRE 06931 27932 --+" $0.00 "--10/05/88 -� 00547 $21.00 00955 27933 --/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS-- $0.00.. 10/05/88 vro I•% FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 10/11/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MICHELE*TERCERO PER DIEM ADVANCE PAGE 0016 DATE 10/06/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $21.00 01829 001-400-1205-4317 00030 $150.00 TR216 10/01/88 CABLE TV /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** VENDOR. R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHCS/SEP 88 -- TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHCS/SEP 88 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHCS/SEP 88 00124 001-400-3103-4309 00725 09/30/88 ST MAINTENANCE 00124 001-400-3104-4309 00041 09/30/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00574 09/30/88 PARKS - $150.00 $36. 69 -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $36. 69 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $84. 52 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $157.90. R ULTRA SEAL INTERNATIONAL -TIRE SEALANT/POLICE -- - .. 8286 --- 02450 001-400-2101-4311 07/27/88 POLICE 00554 $329.10 ----./AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $329.10 R J. S. *WARD & COMPANY LIAB SERV/OCT-DEC 88 TR216 00216 27934 $0.00 . 10/05/88 00957 27935 $0. 00 10/05/88 00957 27935 $0. 00 10/05/88 00957 27935 $0. 00 10/05/88 8286 06384 27936 $0.00-10/05/88 • 02507 705-400-1209-4201 00068 $5,700.00 00042 27937 '- 10/01/88 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT -,--____--.--_ $0.00-10/05/88 ..-_ - - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5,700.00 R WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY PUBLICATIONS/CTY CLERK - 97533-- 00141 001-400-1131-4201 00422 - 09/02/88 -- CITY ATTORNEY $28.06 46397533 04557 27938 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 -10/05/88- - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************#************************************************* R SALLY A. *WHITE --- SEC SERV/SEP 20,88-- $28.06 0,88--- $28.06 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00171 $68.00 09/28/88 - PLANNING COMM - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ---- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R WRAY PRINTING i - -- STREET SIGNS --- $68. 00 . 06049 27939 $0.00 ... _ 10/05/88 00132 001-400-3104-4309 00042 $394.04 2593 06751 27940 2593 ------09/19/88 - TRAFFIC SAFETY --/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS-- '04 ATERIALS- $0.00 10/05/88 'h I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:58:12 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017 FOR 10/11/88 DATE 10/06/88 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF . PO if CHK 11 DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $394. 04 R ZAVATSKY BARREL 00316 001-400-6101-4309 00575 $275.84 1247 06750 27941 TRASH BARRELS 1247 09/14/88 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 10/05/88 *** VENDOp TOTAL******************************************************************** $275.84 0 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $109. 696. 88 $138. 662. 31 1 HERLBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR LAIMS COVERED BY " THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGE TO NCLUSIVE OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR / //�//f ARE ACCURATE AND FUND ARE AV LABLE FOR PAY ENT THEREOF: BY FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR DATE /0/�D/fr Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council October 4, 1988 For the Meeting of October 11, 1988 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please Consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #027557 - Susan Beacham - $4.00. Account Number 001-300-0000- 3411. Susan Beacham paid for another party. #027495 - Mary C. Rooney - $286.00. Account Number 001-400-4601- 4317. Foundation to pay per diem mileage. #027830 - Ultra Seal International - $322.42. Account Number 001-400-2101-4311. Wrong amount issued. #026990 - Juan Salvatierra - $41.00. Account Number 110-300- 0000-3392. Money was refunded by DMV. #025684 - Southern California Edison Co. - $14,778.19. Account Number 105-400-2601-4303. Never received by vendor. #027525 - Vagabond Inn - $101.37. Account Number 001-400-2701- 4316. Reservation no longer needed. Concur: City Manager Gary Brut h City Tre.surer Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council October 4, 1988 City Council Meeting of October 11, 1988 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent October 25, 1988 Proclamation - Red Ribbon Week Introduction of new employees Consent Calendar Approval of contract with Audio Graphics Systems, Inc. for instal- lation of screen and projectors in the Civic Theatre Request to accept as complete CIP 87-606, first floor Police Dept. remodel including dispatch center City Treasurer's Report - September Expenditure & Revenue Reports - September Acceptance of work as complete - Beach Drive storm drain/sanitary sewer/street improvements Report on results of noise ordi- nance study City Council Items Selection process for commissioners November 9, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report - October Municipal Matters Review of City goals Personnel Director Community Resources Dir. Public Works Director City Treasurer Finance Administrator Public Works Director Public Safety Director City Treasurer City Manager *********A**A*******A***AAA***AA*****A**AA******A*A**AAA*A*****A* Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Bicycle path repairs, CIP 87-165 Public Works Director Result of survey for No Parking on Valley Drive from Pier Avenue north per School District request Request to accept as complete CIP 86-602, electrical upgrade at City Hall including new electric generator Public Works Director Public Works Director Request to accept as complete CIP 87-171, asphalt street repairs - remove and replace and crack sealing Public Works Director Speed Survey Certification Additional report on tennis court operations at Community Center Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. Public Works Director Comm. Resources Director City Clerk Recreational Vehicle ordinance General Services Director Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium Uniform Fire Code Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location Planning Director Planning Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director City Attorney ***************************************************************** Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council September 29, 1988 City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION OF RECYCLING FUNDS PROVIDED BY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BACKGROUND Pursuant to Council direction, staff applied for and received $5,000 from the County Sanitation District to fund a recycling feasibility study for the City of Hermosa Beach. The money was deposited in an account in the general fund. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $5,000 from the general fund to Building Department account 001-400-4201- 4305. ANALYSIS Staff has met with representatives of Browning-Ferris Industries and has determined that they have substantial expertise regarding the marketing of recycled materials as well as alternative types of recycling programs. The main missing component to determining the feasibility of instituting a recycling program in Hermosa Beach is determination of the level of resident interest in par- ticipating in such a program. The funds will be used for that purpose. Concur: Concur: Respectfully submitted, Ja ce Silver, 'Admin. Aide De . of Bldg. & Safety 21"— evin B. North9raft William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Co%land Finance Administrator October 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 11, 1988 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR REFUND OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FEES FOR BICYCLE RENTALS AT 74 14TH STREET APPLICANT: ALI BANIHASHEMI 12531 S. EUCALYPTUS AVE. #F HAWTHORNE, CA 90250 Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the refund of fees for the Conditional Use Permit request ($320.00). Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 7, 1988, approved a Conditional Use Permit for the outdoor storage of bicycles for a bicycle and quadracycle rental business to be located on a lot to be leased from the City of Hermosa Beach. The City Council, at their meeting of June 14, 1988, denied the lease agreement of the city -owned lot at 74 14th Street. Analysis The Planning Department received a request for a refund of Conditional Use Permit application fees (Letter attached). The applicant states his fees should be refunded since the lease of the city -owned lot was not approved. The applicant had proposed to operate a bicycle rental business at the site and was working with the General Services Department in securing the lease. The City Council denied approval of the lease, therefore, the Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning Commission is null and void since a C.U,:P1 is for a specific site. An rew Perea Associate Planner Michael Schuu ach Planning Director Jo o on Generftl Service Direc Kevin B. Northcr City Manager 1 lg C 16 September 1988 Ali M. Banihashemi 12531 S. Eucalyptus Ave. #F Hawthorne, Ca 90250 Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 Dear Planning Department, At the beginning of this year, I planned to open a cycle business in Hermosa Beach. In doing so, I proposed to lease a city -owned lot (Lot 14) by submitting proper paperwork and payment. My attempts began in January, leading to many meetings with the City of Hermosa Beach staff members. I spent hours preparing for this business and trying to review and solve any concerns set forth by the Mayor and Members of the City Council. After attending many Council Meetings, my plans were destroyed at the final approval meeting when a Council Member voted to have the lot transformed onto a parking lot. Though this lot had been vacant for a very long time, a parking lot wasn't considered until my plans were introduced, presented and finalized. At this time, I am inclined to request a refund of the fees I paid. It is evident that my time and energy was wasted on a project that should have been denied in the initial steps of the plan. Initially, had the City Council taken a reasonable look at the property in question, much energy and suffering could have been saved on all our parts. Please review this project and inform me of your decision. Also, please let me know if in fact the lot is being used as a parking lot. Your anticipated cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, dLU Ali M. Banihashemi (o) Recommendation to,.approve lease agreement for rental of city -owned property at 74 -14th Street. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated May 17, 1988. Addressing the Council on this item was: Carol Banihashemi - 12531 Eucalyptus Hawthorne - explaining the proposed bicycle rental and storage. Action: To not approve the lease agreement, to use this lot fo parking purposes only, and to go ahead with. the eight parking spaces. Motion Williams, second Creighton. Noting the objec- tions of Rosenberger and Sheldon, so ordered. - 4 Minutes 6 -14 -RR October 4, 1988 City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: Bernice Lindo 1232 Corona St., Hermosa Beach, represented by Laraine A. Ryan, Legal Offices of David A. Grey, 1800 N. Vine St., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90028; alleged trip & fall on curb; leg injury. Bernie Winikur 1232 Corona St., Hermosa Beach, represented by Laraine A. Ryan, Legal Offices of David A. Grey, 1800 N. Vine St., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90028; alleged trip & fall on curb; loss of consortium. Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator. Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. -6zileet)&44-41-‘ KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk Concur: Ez-r VIN B. NORTHCRAFT, City Manager lh Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 3, 1988 Regular Meeting of October 11, 1988 COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PIER AVENUE STORM DRAIN EXTENSION Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the cooperative agreement with Los Angeles County for the construction of a storm drain extension, i.e., a lateral in Beach Drive from Pier Avenue to 13th Street. This agreement is in the City Clerk's Office for review. Background: On July 21, 1988 the Public Works Department requested County Financial assistance for a storm drain extension which will connect to the Los Angeles County storm drain facility, commonly known as Pier Avenue Drain. This is for work in connection with CIP 87-405 (Sewer Rehabilitation -Target Area 3) which is currently out to bid. Analysis: The storm drain extension will be located on Beach Drive between Pier Avenue and 13th Street. The agreement has been prepared by the County and provides for the City to design, construct and inspect the project in the 1988-89 Fiscal Year. Under the terms of the agreement, the County is to contribute up to $55,000 toward the cost of the project construction. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Do not approve the agreement; thereby, forfeiting $55,000 in reimbursable expenses from the County. Respectfully submitted, Ant ony Antich Director of Pub is Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Concur: evin B. Northcpaft City Manager Finance Administrator Attachment: September 22, 1988 Letter from Los Angeles County :my 1 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS September 22, 1988 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 Mr. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-0299 Dear Mr. Northcraft: PIER AVENUE DRAIN - BEACH DRIVE LATERAL PROPOSED CITY -COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: PD -3 850.6 Enclosed are three originals and one copy of a proposed agreement regarding our cooperative project to construct a storm drain, called Pier Avenue Drain - Beach Drive Lateral, located in Beach Drive from Pier Avenue to 13th Street. The project is entirely within the jurisdictional limits of the City. This agreement has been prepared as requested by Mr. Anthony Antich in his letter of July 21, 1988 and as a result of various discussions between our respective staffs. The agreement provides for the City to design, construct and inspect the project in the 1988-89 Fiscal Year. Under the terms of the agreement, the County is to contribute up to $55,000 toward the cost of the project construction. If the proposed agreement is satisfactory, please present it to your duly authorized officials for approval. Your City seal should be affixed to each copy. Upon approval, please return the three originals to the County Department of Public Works for further processing. After final approval by the County Board of Supervisors, we will return one fully executed copy to you. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. V- y truly yoars, T. TIDEMANSON Dirtorof Public Works GMP : j m/pier Enc. cc: Supervisor Dana September 27, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council October 11, 1988 RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A YELLOW (20 MINUTE LOADING) ZONE ON LOMA DRIVE FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH FLORIST SHOP ON PIER AVENUE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 88- , establishing a yellow (20 minute loading) zone on Loma Drive for The Hermosa Beach Florist Shop. Background: On September 19, 1988 the Public Works Department received a letter from Steve Gallardo of The Hermosa Beach Florist Shop requesting a 20 minute loading zone adjacent to his shop for receipt and delivery of fresh flowers daily. Mr. Gallardo is more then willing to pay for the cost of the loading zone, installation of $350 and yearly maintenance cost of $100. Copy of letter attached. Analysis: Staff conducted a site investigation on September 26, 1988. It was determined that there is a need for a yellow loading zone. The flower shop has no rear entrance, so all receipt and deliveries of flowers must go through the front door facing Pier Avenue. Staff recommends that the yellow loading zone be established in the first parking space north of Pier Avenue on Loma Drive (see attached diagram), so The City won't lose a parking space on Pier Avenue. Fiscal Impact: There are no meters in this area; therefore, there will be no revenue loss. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Deny request. Respectfully submitted: Concur: Anny Antich Engineering Technician Director of Public Works Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 Concur: Jo Noon Director of General Services 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A TWENTY MINUTE PARKING RESTRICTION ON A CERTAIN SECTION OF LOMA DRIVE AS HEREIN SET FORTH. WHEREAS, The City Municipal Code Section 19-87. Curb marking yellow means, No Stopping, Standing or Parking at Any Time between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. of any day except Sundays and holidays for any purpose other than the loading or unloading of passengers or materials; provided more than three minutes, nor the loading or unloading of materials more than twenty minutes. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. NS 2435, as amended shall be and is hereby further amended by adding the following subsection to Section 9, Loading Zones. Section 9.60 Loma Drive: On the east side between a point 10' to 30' North of Pier Avenue. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 11th day of October, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Clerk , City Attorney . , , • ' '• • • , - a/s)3°I./(e Cq.Z eLV0 FIRST ADDITION TO roo CC W October 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 11, 1988 RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH STREET SWEEPING HOURS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FROM PIER AVENUE TO ARTESIA BOULEVARD Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 88- , establishing street sweeping hours (9:30 am to 11:30 am) along the west side of Pacific Coast Highway from Pier Avenue to Artesia Boulevard. Background: At this time the City does not have posted street sweeping hours on Pacific Coast Highway. The street is swept on Fridays and the sweeper will go around the cars that are parked. This has resulted in numerous citizen complaints about the dirty gutters in the area from Pier Avenue to Artesia Boulevard. Analysis: A site investigation by staff revealed the following: 1. The east side of PCH ,(parking lane) is posted No Parking 6:00 am to 9:00 am. The west side is not posted. 2. The City crews sweep PCH on Friday morning; the east side first to take advantage of the posted No Parking 6:00 am to 9:00 am. A potential hazard exists during the sweeping of the west side of PCH as the sweeper has to "swing" in and out of the west lane of traffic to get around parked cars. 3. By posting the west side No Parking 9:30 am to 11:30 am, Fridays only, the sweeper operator will have a clear path. The residents that have not left for work will be able to park on the east side of PCH during these hours. tm Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Return to staff for further study. 2. Do nothing. Respectfully Submitted, G'_ ry heaton Concur: Anthony Antich Engineering Technician Director of Putillic Works eiv5) Concur: Received too late for City Manager review Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 Concur: Joan `Noon Director of General Services tr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED BY ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, BETWEEN PIER AVE AND ARTESIA BOULEVARD, DURING THE HOURS OF 9:30 A.M. TO 11:30 A.M. ON FRIDAY ONLY, EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. NS 2435, as amended shall be and hereby further amended by adding the following subsection to Section 4 "No Parking". "Section 4.82 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, between Pier Avenue and Artesia Blvd, west side only, between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. Friday only excluding Holidays." SECTION 2. That said Pacific Coast Highway is a street operated, maintained, and controlled by the State of California, Department of Transportation, as a State Highway and therefore in accordance with the provisions of Section 22506 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, the provisions of this resolution shall not become effective until the City of Hermosa Beach has submitted' it to the Department of Transportation and obtained its approval in writing for the adoption of this resolution, on the condition that this resolution shall cease to be operative six months after receipt by the City Council of said City of written notice of withdrawal of approval by said Department of Transportation. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 11th day of October 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California _ 41. A°° %Mrr' ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK ,CITY ATTORNEY October 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 11, 1988 INFORMATION REPORT ON CITY RECYCLING AND ENERGY CONSERVATION. PROGRAMS Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file this information report on staff's current activities regarding recycling and energy conser- vation within the City organization. Background: The City has had a prior program of recycling paper and has also received an energy audit from Southern California Edison in 1986. Efforts in these areas are included in the comprehensive list of cost saving and revenue generating ideas being reviewed and im- plemented this year as part of the Council's No. 1 goal to im- prove the City's financial picture. Analysis: With coordination by our Building Department, the past program of recycling white ledger and computer paper has now been reinstituted. In addition, staff has received an update of the 1986 energy audit from Edison and is in the process of implement- ing suggestions to reduce our energy costs where appropriate. We anticipate some revenue generation from the recycling and con- siderable savings from implementation of energy conservation mea- sures. In addition to these cost factors, these programs will help in preserving energy resources and provide an example for others. In addition to these programs within the City organization, staff is pursuing the possibility of improving recycling activities throughout our community as reflected in separate items on your October 11, 1988 agenda regarding a recycling study and the State's recycling model city competition. KBN/ ld 1n October 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 11, 1988 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE AIR CONDITIONING, CIP 88-610 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Los Angeles Air Conditioning at a cost not to exceed $81,840; 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations; 3. Appropriate $21,274 from the General Fund, Designation for Capital Improvements to CIP 88-610, and 4. Approve a loan of $25,000 from the General Fund for the Community Center Foundation share of CIP 88-610 to be repaid from Foundation contributions. Background: On August 9, 1988 City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 88-610. The project was publicly advertised for three weeks and fifteen contractors received bid packages. Analysis: This analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. - The Bids 2. Reference Check 3. The Lowest Cost & Most Responsible Bidder 4. Foundation Donations 1. THE BIDS Seven sealed bids were received by the City Clerk on September 22, 1988. The bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bid results were as follows: 1. Los Angeles Air Conditioning 2. Airemasters 3. Rusher Air Conditioning 4. Sanval 5. S.E. Clemons 6. Air -Ex 7. B.G. Construction $74,400 77,433 77,737 79,860 81,625 82,634 92,500 Architect's Estimate $83,700 * % difference from architect's estimate. All bids are available for review at the office of The City Clerk. 1 lk 2. 'REFERENCE CHECK At least three references were questioned for each of the lowest three bidders to determine their qualifications. All three contractors have valid C-20 Licenses (Warm Air, Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, No. 208872) with the State of California; no violations have been filed against the firms. 3. THE LOWEST COST & MOST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER Los Angeles Air Conditioning is the lowest cost bidder. The reference questionnaire indicates that Los Angeles Air Conditioning is the most qualified for doing this type of work, finishing on schedule, within budget, and producing quality work. 4. FOUNDATION DONATIONS The Community Center Foundation president was contacted and said that a fund has been established specifically for the Theatre Air Conditioning. Presently $5,000 have been contributed by a private donation. $25,000 are expected to be raised in this budget year. Fiscal Impact: Contractor Amount Not to Exceed: Contractor Bid 10% Contingency Not to Exceed Budgeted Amounts: Design Construction Inspection Subtotal 10% Contingency Total $74,400 7,440 $81,840 Budgeted Proposed Additional Approp. f Amount Contract Amt. Required $ 1,000 60,000 6,000 $67,000 6,700 $73,700 $ 2,500 $ 1,500 81,840 21,840 2,000 < 4,000> $86,340 $19,340 8,634 1,934 $94,974 $21,274 $21,274 additional funds are necessary to complete this project. Funding Sources: General Fund Private Donation Total Funding 2 $69,974 25,000 $94,974 f General Fund, designation for capital improvements: Estimated balance (as of 9-30-88) $422,165 Funds transferred to CIP 88-610 21,274 New Estimated Balance $400,891 Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Reject the low bidder 2. Re -bid the project. 3. Drop the project. Respectfully submitted: Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: Received too late for City Manager Review Concur: Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Kevin B. Northcraft Viki Copeland City Manager Attachment: Project Schedule accctac/pwclerk 3 Finance Administrator CONSTRUCTS SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : Community Center Theatre Air Conditioning ACCOUNT NUMBER : CIP 88-610 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : MI MI MN ACTUAL SCHEDULE X : 100% COMPLETE TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I I -r ----I . I I I I I '7/2EF'inal design approval before advertising 111111 for construction 11 88 I I I I i Prepare advertisement & set bid opening III date ,, al I I I I Advertising period11111 ��ullill (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening Review bids Award contract 9/27/88 Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" 11/ 4 /88 . Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete 2/7 /89 Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project close out I I I IIIA I a I I I 7111111111 se I • 1 I I ...I I I I I I I I I Bili 1 I I I I I I.„. I I I I 1 I.”„ 1 1......111I I I I I I.........1 1111111111111111111i11111111111111 I I 11111111111 i111111,,i111111 I I 11111 I I I. I11111 I 'mit I I I I I I II I I I nu I. I111111 nu..1�� I I I I I I I I I I. 1 October 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 11, 1988 LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission that the City Council approve the attached lease Agreement between the City and the Hermosa Beach Historical Society. BACKGROUND On January 1, 1987 the Historical Society began leasing Room 6D and on July 1, 1987 they added Room 7 to the lease. These rooms are located in the Hermosa Beach Community Center. ANALYSIS The Historical Society has requested a renewal of their lease agreement with the City for space in the Community Center. The previous lease calls for a waiver of the rent and periodic updates to the Council. It appears the Historical Society is not yet financially viable to pay to the City the lease rent to occupy rooms 7 and 6D. That amount is approximately $10,000 per year. In an effort to address that, the Historical Society is suggesting Room 7 can be opened at night for meetings to groups that are City sanctioned. i.e. Sister Cities organization, Little League Board of Directors, etc. In that way, the meeting rooms these groups occupy, can now be rented out to other groups requesting meeting space, thus generating revenue to the City. As the Historical Society was formed at the behest of the City Council and they are in the process of becoming a viable organization, staff and the Advisory Commission recommends their request be granted. Concur: 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respect! submitted, Mary ey, Ac i g Director Dept of ommunity Resources lj HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 11th day of October 1988 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and H. B. Historical Society (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of October ,1988 , and ending on the 30th day of September ,1989 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 6D Storage Room 7 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: Rental fee waived. Society has agreed to open room 7 for public meetings. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. All plans for the remodel of Rooms 7 and 6D shall be approved by the following City Departments prior to work being done: Department of Public Works, Department of Building and Safety and Fire Department. 2. Lessee's name shall be placed on tenant sign board. 3. Room 7 shall encompass 1,078 square feet only. 4. All window dressing shall receive approval of the Department of Community Resources prior to installation. 5. Fire inspections shall take place on the premises. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Storing, cataloguing, displaying of historical artifacts and related Historical Society events. And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; 2 (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli- gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall, if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City 3 wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac- tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained because of Lessee's use of the premises. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Hermosa Beach Historical Society c/o Mr. Rick Learned 635 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 5 LESSEE: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council October, 3 1988 City Council Meeting Of October 11, 1988 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PU TG A ,EQ TS E4 . �I R _QSQ_ _ EQC1J Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of September 1988. Respectfully submitted, Garyrutsch City Treasurer NOTED: evin Northcraft City Manager ill INVESTMENT REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1988 BALANCE 9/01/88 Withdrawal Withdrawal $3,820,000.00 (350,000.00) (500,000.00) Balance 9/30/88 $2,970,000.00 ;9unty.SQvings Bpnk Investment $ 100,000.00 M T 9/13/88 9/22/88 12/23/87 1/6/89 c4i1C4rna,@_Fg4V1:121_.. 4 L Investment $ 100,000.00 12/28/87 12/30/88 �:.S 4.4 Investment $ 99,000.00 1/6/88 1/6/89 kQng_$�ach__S_ Investment $ 100,000.00 1/6/88 1/6/89 Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 calAT4r1P40_ �y1�2g Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.05% 8.375% 8.15% 9.0% 8.5% 8.5% 8.75% Eespt/ua-_4ffir,ings Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 P.n iric,,. $Qv ing g„ Dank Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 Investment $ 99,000.00 1/15/88 1/17/89 Eoutlder*..5_4.1 Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/3/89 We§tWQQa .S�&_., Investment $ 99,000.00 2/5/88 2/3/89 Investment $ 99,000.00 2/18/88 2/22/89 Q2151t11.,9.4.V Dank Investment $ 99,000.00 2/24/88 2/23/89 1Juotingt4P_,a_4-j. Investment $ 99,000.00 2/25/88 2/24/89 £Q1,VT121_4_D}L_i Investment $ 99,000.00 3/3/88 2/27/89 WeI tern_Evskroi Investment $ 400,000.00 3/31/88 3/17/89 8.75% 8.85% 9.15% 8.625% 8.50% 8.20% 8.0% 7.85% 7.4% 7.75% Egrd_MotQr _Crk4 t ..c4. Investment $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 9.10% Investment $ 500,000.00 6/30/88 1/2/90 8.35% Vomit -�ufrara9T _ion Investment $ 500,000.00 9/15/88 10/16/89 8.90% Invesment $ 500,000.00 9/22/88 9/22/89 8.50% dL.MQ Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment Investment TOTAL BALANCE $ 248,733.64 $ 249,320.88 $2.A.15122.51.1514, Respectfully Submitted, Gary Br tsch City Treasurer 3/26/87 5/26/87 3/1/17 8/2/16 8.0% 9.50% October 4, 1988 City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 Mayor and Members ' of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-957 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY CODE ARTICLE V. COMMUNITY RESOURCES SECTIONS 2-63 THROUGH 2-68 INCLUSIVE, CHANGING THE NAME OF THE COMMUNITY RESOURCES COMMISSION TO PARKS, RECREATIONS, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION. Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 88-957 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of September 27, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: • Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger None Williams None Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 957 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CITY CODE ARTICLE V. COMMUNITY RESOURCES SECTIONS 2-63 THROUGH 2.68 INCLUSIVE, CHANGING THE NAME OF THE COMMUNITY RESOURCES COMMISSION TO PARRS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the Community Resources Commission was created in 1981 by Ordinance No. 81-663 by merging the park and recreation commission and the community center commission; and WHEREAS, the Community Resources Commission requested that the City Council change their name to Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission on September 13, 1988; and the City Council agreed to make this change; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Article V. Community Resources Sections 2-63 through 2-68 inclusive and Ordinance No. 81-663, and hereby amended to change the name of the Community Resources Commission to Parks, Recreation, Community Resources Advisory Commission. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California in the manner provided by law. and in 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SECTION 4. That the City Clerk certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED ArT5 FORM: 25 26 27 28 Y ATTOR1vE 2 DAY OF , 1988. PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA October 4, 1988 City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO.`88-958 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE II (Title); SECTION 17-50; SECTION 13-8; SECTION 13-14; SECTION 29.5-5; AND ADDING SECTION 29-18.1; TO ESTABLISH AND CLARIFY PROCEDURES REGARDING GAMES OF CHANCE, GAMBLING, APPEALING DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON TENTATIVE MAPS, AND COSTS OF CONVERSION OF UTILITY FACILITIES. Submitted for waiver of full reading and reintroduction is Ordinance No. 88-958 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of September 27, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger None Williams None However, upon review it was noted that under Section 4. , Subdivision of Land, it stated that a notice of appeal should be filed with the city manager within ten (10) days. This should be changed to the city clerk to be consistent with other appeals, and Government Code section 66452.5. The ordinance attached reflects this change. 462V46.41ft4i45,AL Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: N B. evin N evin ort•craft, City Manager �1 b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 959 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE II (Title); SECTION 17-50; SECTION 13-8; SECTION 13-14; SECTION 29.5-5; AND ADDING SECTION 29-18.1; TO ESTABLISH AND CLARIFY PROCEDURES REGARDING GAMES OF CHANCE, GAMBLING, APPEALING DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON TENATIVE MAPS, AND COSTS OF CONVERSION OF UTILITY FACILITIES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to bring the Hermosa Beach City Code up to date with current statutory provisions: WHEREAS, Article II (Title) and Section 17-50 of the Hermosa Beach City Code, provides for regulation of Card Rooms, Card Schools, Games of Skill and or Games of Chance; WHEREAS, regulation of Games of Chance is preempted by state law, not subject to municipal control, and therefore any reference should be deleted; WHEREAS, Chapter 13, Gambling, Section 13-8 prohibits the game of "bingo" to be played in the City of Hermosa Beach, but Section 13-14 allows the games of "bingo" for charity pursuant to permit, therefore Section 13-8 should be amended to make exception under Section 13-14, and Section 13-14 should be amended to reference Section 13-8; WHEREAS, Chapter 29.5, Subdivision of Land, Section 29.5-5 allows 15 days for appealing a decision of the planning commission on tenative maps and improvement recommendations, L26/ordud 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ,14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and Government Code section 66452.5 requires the appeal to be made within 10 days, Section 29.5-5 should be amended to provide for an appeal within 10 days of the Planning Commission's decision; WHEREAS, the California Streets and Highways Code section 5896.5 requires that in order to initiate proceedings for conversion of existing overhead utility facilities, the City Council must determine that the City or a public utility has voluntarily agreed to pay over 50 percent of all costs of the conversion, except the costs of users' connection, Section 29-18.1 has been added to the Hermosa Beach City Code to reflect this requirement; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA. BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 17, Article II (Title) and Section 17-50 (Definitions) be amended to read as follows: ARTICLE II. CARD ROOMS, CARD SCHOOLS, GAMES OF SKILL Sec. 17-50. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms shall have the meaning as hereinbelow set forth. (a) Cardroom or card club shall mean and include card club, social club, club or any other place maintained or operated or conducted for the purpose of funishing a place where members, guests or other persons play card games and for which : (1) A fee is charged either as a membership dues or for admission to such place or for the privilege of playing at cards: or (2) A fee is charged for use of, or there is sold for use upon the premises, any cards, tables, tokens, chairs, or any other device or accouterments for the playing of cards; or /// L26/ordud 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) Any collection or donation of money or thing of material value is made to or received by the licensee for the privilege of playing at cards. A "cardroom" or "card club" shall also mean any place maintained or operated wherein any game of skill, as further defined, is played. (b) Card school shall mean any place maintained, operated or conducted for the purpose of giving instructions in the playing of card games. (c) Games of skill shall mean any games played, conducted, dealt, maintained, operated, or carried on with the application of manipulative or mental skill or dextierity combined with the use of cards, dice, billiard balls, pool balls, cues or with any mechanical devices, appliances, or contrivances, or with any other device where the same is played, conducted, dealt, maintained, operated or carried on for money, chips, checks, slugs, tokens, credit or any toher thing of value or redeemable in or exchangeable for money, merchandise, or other thing of value. EXCEPTIONS: Coin-operated machines commonly known as juke boxes and coin-operated vending machines, as same are commonly known and designated, are hereby exempted. Section 2. That Chapter 13, Gambling, Section 13-8 be amended to add the following exception at the end of the ordinance: Sec. 13-8. Certain games of chance such as bingo, etc., prohibited. EXCEPTIONS: Nothing in this section shall prohibit the game of "bingo" if permited pursuant to Article II, Sec. 13-14, et seq. of this chapter. Section 3. That Chapter 13, Article II, Section 13-14, be amended to read as follows: ARTICLE II. BINGO GAMES FOR CHARITY Sec. 13-14 Organizations eligible for city permit to conduct bingo games. Organizations which are organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literacy or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals; and exempted from the payment of the bank and corporation tax by Section 23701d of the Revenue and Taxation Code and a contribution or gift to which would be a charitable contribution under Section 170 (c)(2) of the Internal L26/ordud 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Revenue Code of 1954, are eligible to apply to the city for a permit to conduct bingo games in the city under the provisions of Section 326.5 of the Penal Code and the provisions of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter shall permit bingo games prohibited by Section 13-8, unless pursuant to permit under this article. Section 4. That Chapter 29.5, Subdivision of Land, Section 29.5-5, paragraph 5, be amended to read as follows: If the subdivider is dissatisfied with any action of the planning commission with respect to the tentative map or the kinds, nature and extent of the improvements recommended by the planning commission to be required, he may appeal to the city council for a public hearing thereon by filing a written notice of appeal with the city clerk within ten (10) days after such action. Section 5. That Section 29-18.1 be added to Chapter 29, Streets and Highways, and read as follows: Sec. 29-18.1. Costs for Conversion. In order to initiate conversion proceedings, the city council shall determine that the city or a public utility has voluntarily agreed to pay over 50 percent of all costs of conversion, excluding costs of users' connections to underground electric or communication facilities. Section 6. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 7. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. /// /// /// /// L26/ordud 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24( 25 26 27 28 Section 8. That the City Clerk certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of official ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE TH DAY OF 1988. ATTEST: KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO J MES P. LOUGH L26/ordud CITY ATTORNE PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. October 4, 1988 City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-959 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREA 3 AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 88-959 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of September 27, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger None Williams None evin B. Northcraft, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 -959 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREA 3 AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The lots in the subject Area 3 are of sufficient size to be zoned! R -2B; B. Rezoning of Area 3 from R-2 to R -2B will result in a density reduction; C. The General Plan will require an amendment from Low Density to Medium Density to bring the area into consistency. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Rezone Area 3 from R-2 to R -2B, legally described as follows: - Lot 1, 2, & 3 of Tract 30459. - Lots 47 - 62 inclusive, 75 - 82 inclusive & 165 - 172 inclusive of the Southern California Convention Hall and Marine View Park Tract. - Lot A of Tract 3641. 2. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to September 27, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PPROVED 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /ccrszon3 1. Location a. Address: b. Legal: Area 3 See attached map 2. Description Rezone of area 3 to be consistent with General Plan policies 3. Sponsor a. Name: Planning Department b. Mailing Address: 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone:213-376-6984 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4 • In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which in plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed • to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE .We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this prc posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation mcac ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this`, finding is on file in the Building Department. 721 Date of Finding Chairman ---Environmental Review Committee FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, -- •-- •• '• included in the project, it would not have a significant effect vironment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Build- ing Department. rose o / T • on the en- DateFinding airman, Planning Commission FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, - --- ures are included in the—pr-o4ect, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. Date of Finding - Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council C. AREA 3 C N Rezone from Two -Family Residential Zone (R-2) to Limited Multiple -Family Residential Zone (R -2B) I 41 ui • w° BOUNDARY 30 . 9- w w Z 2 4s7•'o O C 62 iii.3 WA/_ •61 ?5 25 60 .. 59 .. _ 2J 58 57 23 56 55 2? 54 53 2/ 52 • 51 .. �b 50 _ 49 /9 48 • 47 zs . r.8 170 • 169 _ .. fr j�f2 3z�•• . 7$ -IT- e a{;µo 31 , ,, • !t +...,f 74 LONG FELLOW • AVE. as ' fir J .2 tat ,,, • . or .. .. c. i ,. �, ,,J®c 0 OG1 ,, ,. .3.7'0••" PA • / j .,SLOT• I . • i ' 1 • 1 •• I •S4 , ' ' • 1 ......7......: A , 1 _... _ • .... I 4 i ...... I . _ ..- Sn 75 • .9 172 75 _ 76 171 ' 77 78 79 . 80 81 Y h /05 82 = . r.8 170 • 169 _ .. ,� 168 _ .. 167 . .. .6 166 .. , 11 v; 165 E. A. ' • 30" ST.. Z October 4, 1988 City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-960 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-917 PERTAINING TO THE TIME LIMIT TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 88-960 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of September 27, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger NOES: None ABSENT: Williams ABSTAIN: None ai%d o4n& Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: Kevin B. Northcpaft, City Manager 2d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 960 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-917 PERTAINING TO THE TIME LIMIT T OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. WHEREAS, the City Council considered this matter on Septembe 27, 1988 and made the following Finding: • The revision to the time limit to obtain a building permit i consistent with the City Council action of April 12, 1988 regarding property located at 1840 Hermosa Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain as follows: 1. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 88-917 shall be amended to read as follows: "This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the city prior to February 23, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plans (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and other similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within one year of the effective date of this ordinance." . This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. _ • Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. • The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 APPROVED ASRM: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 27th day of September, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK 10 (IN if �� •T , TTOR E 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEP 20 1988 City Mgr. office September 15, 1988 The Honorable Jim Rosenberger Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 City of West Hollywood •1 Caytc .u' 81 City Council Helen Albert Mayor Abbe Land Mayor Pro Tempore John Heilman Stephen Schulte Paul Koretz Dear Mayor Rosenberger: The West Hollywood City Council is seeking to enlist your assistance in an important effort to stem the spread of HIV infection in Los Angeles County. Public health experts now agree that the single greatest threat for the rapid spread of HIV infection into the general population is posed by intravenous drug users who share contaminated needles and who have unprotected sexual relations. These same experts have also concluded that without an aggressive educational outreach program - targeted specifically at IV drug users - the already devastating toll of the AIDS epidemic will continue to mount. A key component of such an aggressive outreach program is the free distribution of condoms and bleach kits to high- risk individuals. However, when given the opportunity to adopt such a program, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors balked, citing the concern that the action would be viewed as condoning drug use. Regardless of one's views on intravenous drug use or drug users, one incontestable fact remains: virtually every effort designed to stop the spread of HIV among IV drug users has failed, educational efforts have fallen short, and time to act is of the essence. Therefore, the West Hollywood City Council has asked the supervisors to reverse their position on this issue. A letter expressing our concern is enclosed for your information. 8611 Santa Monica Boulevard, West Hollywood, CA 90069-4109, 213 854-7460 The Honorable Jim Rosenberger September 15, 1988 Page Two We realize that the Board is unlikely to act on the basis of our concerns alone. That is why it is so crucial that other municipalities join us in urging the Board of Supervisors to reconsider the adoption of a condom and bleach kit distribution program. The AIDS epidemic is without question the most urgent public health problem facing the nation today. Every community has a stake in helping to eradicate this menace. Your letter urging the Board of Supervisors to adopt a much needed condom and bleach kit distribution program would lend an important boost to this effort. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Cv-t; elen F. Albert Mayor HFA:SES:bc Enclosures t -•hen E. chulte Councilmember September 12, 1988 Supervisor Peter F. Schabarum Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors First District Hall of Administration, Room 856 500 W. Temple Los Angeles, California 90012 City of West Hollywood •••••.•• Iiw• • a NM • ••• same N■ Cry Cd N!9 4b0/1.70E City Council Helen Albert Mayor Abbe Land Mayor Pro Tempore John Heilman Stephen Schulte Paul Koretz Dear Supervisor Schabarum: The West Hollywood City Council is alarmed by the Board of Supervisors' recent decision to scuttle a proposed condom and bleach kit distribution program targeted at intravenous drug users at high risk for spreading and contracting HIV infection. By rejecting the sound and tested advice of your own public health experts, the -board majority is insuring that the relentless, devastating march of this epidemic through our community will continue apace. Medical experts agree that the greatest threat of the spread of AIDS into the larger community is from sexual contact with those who share contaminated IV needles. Without auestion, nothing short of a bold, aggressive, and explicit educational outreachcprogram will be effective in bringing about the behavioral changes required to stem the spread of HIV infection. Specifically, the free distribution of condoms and bleach kits is imperative to the success of this effort. Consider also the fact that, according to the Los Angeles County Health Department, about 5% of the estimated 125,000 intravenous drug users in the county are infected with HIV. The potential risk of HIV infection exploding into the community at large is substantial. In fact, it is incontrovertibly clear that the transmission of HIV by means of IV drug use and unprotected heterosexual activity is the single most important factor contributing to the surge of AIDS in the black and latino communities. 8611 Santa Monica Boulevard. West Hollywood. CA 90069-4109. 213 854-7460 Supervisor Peter F. Schabarum September, 12, 1988 Page Two In light of these considerations, the West Hollywood City Council strongly urges the Board to reverse its position on this issue. Thousands of lives are at stake. The need to take forthright steps to curb the menace of AIDS is urgent in the extreme. The adoption of a strong educational program directed at IV drug users - with the free distribution of condoms and bleach kits as its centerpiece - must be undertaken while there is still time to act. We urge you to join the dozens of counties and communities across the state and nation who have set aside irrelevant disputes about lifestyles and have opted instead for a reasoned response to the troublesome problems posed by IV drug users at risk for spreading HIV. HFA:bc Sincerely, a J/i% JX4j � Helen F. Albert Mayor c Supervisors Halt Bleach, Condom Giveaway Plans By VICTOR MERINA, Times Staff Writer Los Angeles County supervisors, spurning the advice of their own health officials, refused Tuesday to let the county hand out to drug users either condoms or bleach kits to clean dirty needles as a means of preventing the spread of AIDS. In an at -times emotional airing of the issue, the board turned down the controversial plan to provide county social workers with the bleach kits and condoms to distrib- ute to drug addicts during on -the - street counseling sessions. The county Commission on AIDS as well as the Department of Health Services and individual doctors had urged the supervisors to adopt the needle -cleaning and condom giveaways as a necessary strategy to limit the spread of the AIDS virus. Led by Conservative Majority But the supervisors, led by the board's conservative majority, op- posed the idea and said they feared it would send the wrong message. "We're creating an ... illusion [of safe drug use] to those individu- als who have a drug habit.... It's a myth, and it's only camouflaging the problem that we have," Super- visor Mike Antonovich said. That position was echoed by Supervisor Deane Dana. who said the program did not attack the real problems of getting people off drugs and protecting children of drug users. Supervisor Pete Scha- barum also said he "could not in good conscience" support the idea. In its place, the board voted 4 to 1 to conduct a study into other educational approaches to combat AIDS among intravenous drug us- ers. The conservatives were joined by Supervisor Kenneth Hahn, who backed the study and drew the ire of Supervisor Ed Edelman, the lone supporter of the bleach kit propos- al. "This is a health issue vital to our community that we are ducking today, and I think the health of the public is being jeopardized," said an angry Edelman, who criticized Hahn for backing the proposal two weeks ago and changing his mind. Rabbi Allen Freehling, chairman of the Commission on AIDS, was equally adamant that the board was making "a dreadful mistake." "Lives are at risk. and lives are going to be taken as a direct result of the Board of Supervisors' decid- ing not to take the kind of action that can possibly forgo the spread Silver Lake bathhouse ordered closed as health risk. Page 3. of the virus in this community," he added. The Corr-ri�sion on AIDS had proposed that county workers — who are scheduled Thursday to begin seeking out intravenous drug users to provide AIDS education material—be allowed to carry bleach kits that health officials estimate cost about 58 cents apiece. If the program had been adopted, the workers, who are funded with state and federal dollars. would have distributed information on AIDS, passed out condoms and shown intravenous drug users how to clean their needles to avoir: infecting one other. The practices of shari- ; c::,.am- inated needles and eng::', ing in sex without condoms ha•...7 been blamed for the growing number of cases of AIDS infections in the heterosexual community. A dozen other cities and counties, including San Francisco. Orange and San Diego counties, have already adopted programs to distribute bleach kits, officials said. Estimated i% Infected According to county health offi- cials, about 5% of the estimated 125,000 intravenous drug users in the county have the AIDS virus— compared to about 60% of New York City's estimated 200.000 in- travenous drug users. Although the numbers in Los Angeles are con- siderably lower than in New York Please see SUPERVISORS, Page 4 SUPERVISORS: Bleach, Condom Plan Stopped Continued from Page 1 and other cities, supporters of the bleach -kit and condom plan warned that, without resorting to such precautions, the number of victims would rise sharply. Dr. Robert Hurd Settlage, an obstetrician at Women's Hospital, said he sees one or two pregnant women with AIDS every month— most of them infected through either intravenous drug use or by a partner who is a drug user. "If the rates continue, I will be seeing one or two a day, not one or two a month." he said. Not all of the public speakers were in favor of the plan. A vocal contingent from South Los Angeles told supervisors that the vote was a political litmus test to see if supervisors would sanction drug use and homosexual activity. "We'll know before this is over who's standing for family hvvaluus aand who's standing with per- verts, that's for sure," said Ezola Foster, chairwoman of the Black - Americans for Family Values. Dana said later that he could back a bleach -kit plan if the Sher- iffs Department were part of it. However, Freehling and others said they were disturbed by board suggestions that social workers should help authorities identify drug users. "I think what is being set up is social workers becoming police agents, and that defeats the pur- pose of the social worker being a health educator," he said. Schabaruan's Praise Not Taken as Such The issue before the Board of Supervisors was controversial enough—whether to provide ro ide oms intra- venous drug users and with bleach kits to clean their syringes to slow the spread of AIDS. But Supervisor Pete Schabarum caused a flap of his own Tuesday with a remark intended to praise several black women who spoke out against the proposal. Included was one woman who argued that the anti-AIDS program would ben- efit drug users, homosexuals and other "perverts." "For the first time, and I mean for the first time in many years. have never seen such an articulate group from the black community as the ladies that have been here this morning," Schabarum said. His remark drew immediate cat- calls from some black members of the audience, and two black women momentarily disrupted the h ceedings when they approached the supervisors and demanded to , be heard. Later, one of the women who I protested the statement, Bernice I Woods of Compton, said the Scha- barum comment was patronizing and "an insult to the black commu- nity." Asked later if his comments could be viewed as condescending, an irritated Schabarum told report- ers that his remarks were miscon- strued. 'That's their assumption, and unfortunately they are making an incorrect assumption, ' he said labeling the dispute "ridiculous." • L GoS y 17 6 /9 AIDS: Getting It Wrong i Los Angeles County supervisors have made a (serious mistake in rejecting their AIDS Commis- sion recommendation for an aggressive education- al program to the intravenous -drug community. Their action is the more regrettable because it took place against the background of cheers from some in the black community who clearly do com- prehend the immensity of the threat, particularly to minority communities. Four of the five supervisors saw the proposed distribution of condoms and of bleach, for cleaning needles, as measures that would appear to sanction drug addiction. That conclusion ignores the experi- ence in other AIDS -affected areas where this very •�� distribu- program, in some cases amplified by tion of clean needles, has helped effect behavior or changes and has not by any measure encourage drug use. "We'll know before this is over who's standing for family values and who's standing with the perverts, that's for sure," the board was told by Ezola Foster, chairwoman of the Black Americans for Family Values. That misses the point. The pro= posed p ogram was directed at those who already have abandoned the values that she cherishes and who, by their behavior, threaten the ntire of com- AIDS _mum The greatest threat of the spread o the community at large is from sexual contact .with those involved in intravenous drug use.. It is to break that spread into the heterosexual commu- nity that the stark education program, including • x the distribution of condoms and bleach, was rec-mi onended. It has worked elsewhere. Nothing else has shown -the same results. The problem does not respond to sweet talk and appeals. The disdain of the supervisors for this sort of • education had earlier been reflected in the board's hostility to explicit language in AIDS materials directed at high-risk groups. There again the effectiveness of explicit materials, and the ineffec- tiveness been demonstrated beyond a doubt, acordng to public-health officials. • The supervisors will benefit from reading a new policy statement on explicitness in AIDS preven- tion material adopted, Wednesday by -the state AIDS Leadership Committee. It recommended that the use of "whatever language, illustrations or demonstrations, which their local experts feel necessary, be used to effect behavior change." The committee acknowledged that some of the materials will prove 'offensive to some individu- als," but it concluded that "such offense is both . unavoidable and is an acceptable social price to pay for the intended societal benefits."ro from Resistance to the county drug proposal some black leaders was the more regrettable because the blackcommunity in the nation has suffered the most, with blacks accounting for 67% • of the casestransmittedby heterosexual activity and 61 % of the infected children—largely cases involving intravenous_drug use. =r S:. } 413 g Cta4,)-LQ.,3 1-zuk., eA. 1),Sig 1,LakA.- OCT 4 1g8j o. `Ks_ 4-Yett /3-KtriN GyLzi. Gar_)41.ARP f1'4,x,. +LA- fiA-141-4.4LSW /)-)1,61. 01 ci-kAta4te_z. - 9 5i4) a -A c1tt3 aSALoAil TIA1.60-ao u. -A)‘.°-,818 A.A.,c u-,s,,z csb itu 0 ol-ct, cii:AsAa sta. (11.5.0C-u-tiAtA C,t5A-tLc,t. jt.k.<#.k. 1 tm J'NiLL 2± ArLAA) OWL.e taL, 116 CLA ) a_ er *Lk_ rv1,...a cruo7pA,± caac,‘-1(e_, ,irt,(5-60LA tI,Ano-t-4 ,A4,,c-t-LKoL Au_ 145 AkAL.A oik Ga;u3-E1t_ feLDtLt_ £ tc,u J7w.a. *L tesuALt .A-1/4rJJ yttc,-12,L A:q,AJUAi6 cuA, aui,) AL),rs--$LA,1,3 ch. ala, 0-1k64A eJSCA-0 frYLIA6, -7 1 9 8 },rul4 Artik " <T4-0.4AC-L, JULA-Ar- A -)61-/A )4kAfifet-6-. 4(91ZLZ,k1,131) ktAzAqz) isZYk4AYL.Lc.f, Ph.Q.A..Ld trw,4 0.1.0Ju, a October 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 11, 1988 KIWANIS CHRISTMAS TREE SALE REQUEST RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommends City Council approves the request from the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club to conduct a Christmas Tree sale on the south lawn of the Community Center. BACKGROUND The Kiwanis Club brought forth a request for this sale to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission at their Sept. 28th meeting. Kiwanis projects to occupy the site from November 21, 1988 through January 1, 1989. The sale will be a fundraiser for the Kiwanis Club and will also benefit Community Center Foundation's Air Conditioning Fund. (The Kiwanis Club has agreed to donate $1,000 or 10% of their net profits, whichever is higher, to the Foundation's Air Conditioning Fund.) ANALYSIS The Commission agreed that the project should be approved on a one year trial basis subject to the following conditions: • The location of the trees shall be the southern most triangle of the front lawn of the Community Center (abutting 11th Place); • The area can be fenced in and lighted; • Temporary signs can be installed on the front lawn directly in front of the trees and between the marquee and the designated site; ▪ Kiwanis will assume all costs for restoring the area back to its original state, with the Public Works Department approving all work; this may include other areas as the sprinkler system will have to be turned off in that particular area but it will affect other areas as well; said work to be completed by January 15, 1989; Kiwanis will be allowed to have a camper on 11th Place for 24 hour security purposes. Any lost revenue from the meters will be borne by the Kiwanis Club; Kiwanis will pay to the City any other costs incurred by the City with regard to this project; 1 10 . Kiwanis may occupy the site from November 21, 1988 through January 1, 1989; ▪ Kiwanis will provide insurance; • The approval will be for one year only with a review immediately following. Concur: even B. ort City Manager 2 Res •- _ �mitted, Mary CRoy. = •�"� Director Dept. of .mmunity Resources CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach,ih ctor SUBJECT: Addendum to MUC Interim Ordinance Report: 1. Commercial Rezoning in the Multi -Use Corridor 2. Time Frame for MUC Revisions DATE: October 10, 1988 Commercial Rezoning in MUC There has been a notion circulating which has suggested that the City is preparing to rezone residential property within the MUC to Commercial. However, study of MUC will no doubt show that it is unrealistic to expect commercial development to occur that deep into residen- tial areas, particularly because of its impact to residential neighborhoods. Other reasons include topography, age of develop- ment and property ownership. Staff recommendation to impose an interim ordinance is for the purpose of examining high density residential development en- croaching into commercial areas, and it is definitely not for the purpose of rezoning all the residential property in the MUC to commercial. Time Frame for MUC Revisions The following is a tentative schedule for the first phase of revising the Land Use Element and ultimately the General Plan: Date Activity 11-88 Advertise for Contract Planner 1-89 Interview applicants 2-89 Planner is hired 2-89 through 6-89 MUC is examined 7-89 Public hearings on recommended action are held at Planning Commission level 8-89 Public hearings at City Council level is held to finalize action and adopt phase I of revised Land Use Element SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION a Avg / ' ,/t3 October 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 11, 1988 SUBJECT: MULTI -USE CORRIDOR (MUC) INTERIM ORDINANCE LOCATION: EAST/WEST SIDES OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FROM THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS TO EIGHTH STREET, AND FROM PIER AVENUE TO TWENTY-FOURTH PLACE INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends adopting the attached proposed revised Interim Ordinance. Background The City Council, at their August 23, 1988 meeting, adopted a forty-five day interim ordinance generally prohibiting residential development in the MUC. Analysis MUC Concept The Multi -Use Corridor as described in the General Plan allows for both commercial and residential development. The intent was to improve the commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway. However, under the MUC designation, property could also be rezoned to High Density Residential, R-3 zoning. With the desire to reduce density, it would be benificial to study this area in conjunction with the upcoming revisions to the General Plan. If no moratorium is adopted, the possibility is high of stimulating property owners at this time to develop their property in fear of future changes. Current Interim Ordinance The ordinance adopted on August 23, 1988 needs some clarification for the following reasons: 1. The "whereas" statements provide justification to preclude residential construction ando yet the ordinance allows residential use (single family homes) to continue in the Multi -Use Corridor. 2. Section 1(c) exempts "minor" additions to residential structures. What constitutes a "minor" addition? 1 3. Section 1(d) exempts vacant lots subject to compliance with R-1 standards, The ordinance does not appear to preclude demolition permits which would render a lot "vacant and therefore exempt from the moratorium. 4. Section 1(e) allows reconstruction of existing structure to R-1 standards following destruction by fire. Would number of units be limited to one per R-1 standards also? Because of the need for clarification, the staff believes it would be beneficial not to extend the current ordinance, but instead to start over with a revised ordinance for 45 days, and an extension thereafter. Revised Interim Ordinance The proposed ordinance would resolve the need for clarification. Minor additions/alterations would not be able to exceed $20,000. Vacant lots would have to have been vacant since the adoption of this ordinance. Cases of destruction to existing development would be limited to R-1 standards for residential and C-3 for commercial. Use of Consultant Based on past experiences with consultants, including the study of the Multi -Use Corridor, the cost of hiring a consultant would be approximately $15,000 to $20,000, and the minimum time frame for accomplishing this task including preparing the RFP and selecting the consultant would be eight to nine months. The previeous study of this area was started in 1984 and completed in late 1985. The recommended action has never been adopted. This study could be resurrected, and its recommendation considered since little, or no change has occurred in the last 2 years within the area. However, staff believes that this area should be studied in conjunction with the revision to the Land Use Element, and that an in-house contracted planner would be better suited to prepare the revised Land Use Element. Consultants are generally good at the technical aspects of a project, but generally have difficulty in understanding the political idiosyncrasies of a community. The MUC is as much of a political problem as it is a technical problem. Staff also believes that not only will an in-house planner be more in tune with the community, but the cost will be considerably less. It should be noted that an in-house contractual planner was used to prepare the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP) and Land Use Plan (LUP) which were both certified by the Coastal Commission. Staff recommends that the budget be amended at mid -year so that either a consultant or in-house contract planner can be hired to prepare the state mandated revised Housing Element in 1989, and 2 to prepare a revised Land Use Element which would include the Multi -Use Corridor; the Multi -Use Corridor sub -element would be given priority. CONCUR: vin B. ort craft City Manager T/ccsrmuc 3 Michael c ubach Planning Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISH G A MORATORIUM ON THE i ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR !. STRUCTURES IN THE MULTI -USE CORRIDOR. WHEREAS, the Multi -Use Corridor was designed to allow for a mix of commercial and residential uses; WHEREAS, allowing residences in the Multi -Use Corridor area will restrict future opportunities for commercial development along the Commercial Corridor of Pacific Coast Highway; WHEREAS, the mixing of such uses, commercial and residential, blurs the distinctions between commercial and residential neigh- borhoods which create problems associated with commercial devel- opment spilling into residential neighborhoods; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it desires a study of this situation and a recommendation by the Planning Commission on what steps are necessary to take to ensure the integrity of residential neighborhoods while maintaining a secure commercial base; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the constr ction 7--' rendochamo in the Multi -Use Corridor, would defeat the purpose of the stud • // // 4. 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. No building permits shall be issued for projects which meet the following criteria: Any residential construction projects within the area commonly known as the Multi -Use Corridor, which is described attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 2 c__ (a) Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to October 11, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans, and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. (b) Subsection (a) also includes the projects located at 845 and 835 - 15th Street (845 - 15th Street having had a Conditional Use Permit approved on August 23, 1988). (c) This ordinance shall not apply to minor additions/alterations to residential structures that do not add units or where the valuation does not exceed twenty thousand dollars ($20.000.00) as determined by the Building Official. (d) This ordinance shall not apply to lots that are currently vacant as of the date of adoption of this ordinance. Any vacant property within the multi -use corridor shall be allowed to build to the following standards: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Zoned Commercial: tandards Zoned Residential: R-1 standards. (e) In case of destruction by fire or other natural catastrophe, e-/ the property owner shall be allowed to rebuild to C-3 standards for commercially zoned property or to R-1 standards for residentially zoned property including density. // Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of forty-five (45) days from today's date unless extended pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65858. Section 4. The City Council shall draft a report for presentation to the public at its first meeting in November, 1988. Such report shall state what steps are being taken by the City to correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps are planned to be taken in the future to remedy the situation. Section 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: C Y ATTORN PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "A" a MULTI -USE CORRIDOR AREAS SUBJECT TO. /, GC II i.l. i • . %. 1 Ly 11 1 .I t' ; T• LD iViORATORIUN! Lo GC • • • Ip GC • Os I 7 ' 7 •%1/ LD C''' �I / : LD.� ✓ ' ` - • ��' I M .I7 I MDili�p! 1M �A'D - M_0` MD Mp • J :.Np..1 ' MD MD MD ; ' r• I S 4 ; 1-7,37 1 (1 'S .0 •� lb HJ •.e..e LC •' 1 I� .� LD�7 I u �i I:D I h; L,V I/ /I • I e �, , f'^lGCiLC,I{L4p/:L/! /mss` `; ; 1 _ C 1 J • f = ._. rI • • til', ; , vo .-';. OS S `"am- • =:�� `l ii _ . I I IGC • C. is. 'f • L.'.t- ��b:j I 1}�r: t �o . I rG H°_ • =rte ....---:-L-:-..17---4':�O---2 ' ' - I o •G '.! (y1 Irl D• I� 1.5 101 I: "'t HD u MD M�• MD MO MD \'n ,MD 43, HD 11 Hp D GC !GC _ HD GC moHD _ y' J= yp 1 ` �? G: • HD 'HJ — 1 1 • 1 MD . • rn ,._HD.,• �• ;• tip iI I ..� iGC��� = ,� Hp rte. ��yJ li C.`• GC Gc. C 1 i 11,— � ....................... , �` /rr��Hp! • i.•M•+M��71�•nAj.yJ. C. I; +;_L.L.L. HJ '`•`•�`!�'�` - ® — �:�I a•' '� 1 ,J 'r•� r.r, 1• yJi'+ '_ e r`. !,C • —`- L •aC I 1 , • ; Eatitornunkt zir.rta1.5 • Easy' Reader Run Date: September 29, 1988 & October 6, 1988 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 • PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Bea shall hold a public hearing on October u , 19811 ' to consider t following: 1. Extension of or revised interim ordinance prohibiting residential development in the Multi -Use Corridor. 2. Third quarter'General Plan amendment -- redesignatinq area 9B & area T. from Low Density to Medium Density, and area 9C from Low Density to High Density & adopt an Environmental Negative Declaration.* *Maps of subject areas available in Planning Department. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at" 8:00 P.M. in the City Hall Counci Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate -at that time an place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning -an Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to Thursday, October 6, 1988 at 12:00 noon IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raisin only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing describe in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Plannin; Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984 Ext. 242. Kathleen Midstckke City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach C September 7, 1988 Dear Fellow Hermosa Property Owner, On August 23, 1988 the Hermosa Beach City Council passed a moratorium on all residential construction in the Multi Use Corridor (MUC) for a period of Aa days, after which they can extend it up to a maximum of 2.years. The MUC is outlined on the the enclosed map. The reasons for the moratorium are outlined in a memorandum to the City Council from the Planning Dept. dated August 16, 1988. They note that the MUC is designated for mixed use of commercial and residential and that allowing residences to be built in the MUC would restrict commercial development. They also note the City Council is ordering a study of the MUC and that if residential construction is allowed in the MUC it will limit the potential for commercial expansion into residential areas. The discussion of this matter by the City Council revealed the desire of the Council to create further commercial depth along PCH to encourage increased commercial development. The maximum height for commercial structures is 4 . feet as compared to. Q feet for R-2 and 2a feet, for R-1 zoning currently in the MUC. View blockage potential is much greater with commercial development. Also, commercial structures can be built right out to the side walk with no set back. The new theater complex, next to Von's, is 45 feet high and was approved without the benefit of a traffic study. Increased traffic conjestion and noise could affect our neighborhoods along PCH. The result of this moratorium and study could be a rezoning of residential property to commercial. Residential property in commercial zones becomes classified as "legal, non -conforming" and cannot be rebuilt as residential if destroyed 50% or more by catastrophe. Such classification must be disclosed in the sale of property and can affect the property value . Further, many individuals have had difficulty in getting equity loans on this type of property. The moratorium was passed in spite of objections made that the property owners in the effected areas were not notified by mail, were unaware of the potential moratorium, and were not present to air their views on this matter which has a grave impact on their property. The moratorium excludes minor additions to R-1 residences, reconstruction in the event of destruction by fire, etc., and structures built to R-1 standards during the term of the moratorium only. The City Council will meet on Tuesday Sept. 27. 1988 pi 7:30 m in the Council Chambers at 1315 Valley Drive to hear a report from the Planning Dept. on what is being done. A public hearing will be conducted and a vote will be taken on extending the moratorium (up to 2 years). To present your views it is best to speak at the public hearing. It 1s also important to write and call the City Council Members well in advance of the Sept. 27 meeting. They are as follows: June Williams (Res.) 374-5968, Jim Rosenberger ( Res.) 374-1353, Roger Creighton (Res.) 372-3784, Chuck Sheldon ( Res.) 374-3031, and Etta Simpson (Res.) 379-4753. Etta Simpson was the only Council Member to vote against the moratorium. Business phone for all Council Members is 376-6984. Mail can be addressed to them at City of Hermosa Beach, 1315 Valley Dr., Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254. In 1989 the City Council is slated to re -do the General Plan and we need to make our point before then. This information has been assembled and distributed by a group of concerned neighbors. Plans are being made to circulate a petition addressing this issue and you may be contacted regarding this. Your support is essential as the City Council has been operating independent of input from the voters. il‘zof0.t,egetth 22‘(40/0i4C-- ,a4e1, 71•Zg RECE:VED SEP 15 1998 r/t City Mgr. Ortit.e eigeZIWAVe /Zet4!.L) 7‘.0 er4d a.vt. ,visse40-, /7d,rio6 , ttecar_4‘44-. 9/-6t Zecc_. eervull a#00t-o)ttez-a" _vt,1,044--_1,v4et ij z /P— • ae`oPeoPte, e‘___< -‘e feet _Sbee04 SW= /2 4(6_,Irrte-, ,facoftexao-• yllaier _A S5Zzinode 2eaci; 90.25/' September 15, 1988 Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 SEP 19198d City M&• Utitce Dear Council, I am a resident and property owner at 841 Nineteenth Street. I was very surprised to see that the "Multiple Use Corridor" covers my neighborhood, since the area is strictly residential. Any designation of this area as commercial would be contrary to the current use. From Twenty-first to Seventeenth Street Pacific Coast Highway is exclusively residential. Designation of this area in zoning and the General Plan should be residential, in keeping with the current use. Any proposals for commercial use in this area would be met with opposition as an unwelcome intrusion on an exclusive ocean view residential area. Sincerely, Mary M. Hanson ie7 4:. 96-6 )(k12-)-) )41. -€77 )7)„„(2 6t4LJL rs5i OL4-1—t-4Y Xt-f-e-4 Ca.' Mgr. ACe /&L--ka AI • /C4 -P' a" 4 -r -7t r --I3- J- Le a.n Am 6. out et -t September 19, 1988 Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear City Council Members: SEP 211988 pity Mgt. Li�it..t This letter is written in reference to your pending vote on an extension of the moratorium on residential construction in the multi -use corridor along Pacific Coast Highway. As home owners in an adjacent area (2016 Hillcrest Dr.), we are opposed to further commercial expansion into our residential neighborhood. In our opinion, residential construction should. be encouraged and not obstructed by the council. Further commercial construction like the new theatre complex will destroy the small-town ambience most of us cherish. Please do not sacrifice Hermosa in pursuit of the almighty dollar, as your compatriots in Manhattan Beach have done. We deserve better. Thank you for your careful consideration of this matter. John Stewart a„„,p- Donna Stewart c C JAMES F. KAINZ 819 Eighteenth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 376-6668 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, California 90254 September 20, 1988 SEP 2 2 1888 To whom it may concern: I oppose the proposed moritorium in the Multi Use Corridor. I also oppose the rezoning of this Multi Use Corridor for commercial use in the future. Sincerely, Walter S. Kainz 819 Eighteenth Street Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 City Of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 To whom it may concern: SEP 2 21988 We wish to expres-s our opposition to the moritorium proposed in the Multi Use Corridor and any future rezoning of these properties for commercial use. Rebuilding the existing residential units would be pro- hibited after major damage such as a fire or earthquake. It would also change the character of the neighborhood in a manner which we believe would be detrimental. As property owners in the affected area we are against any radical change from the existing land use. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. Walter S. 819 18th St. Hermosa Beach CA 90254 htvg, (1Y JOE BROOKS — Insurance Associated with Adams Insurance Agency P. O. Box 326, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: (213) =cm:3 379-0925 To: Etta Simpson - H. B. Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90 254 SEP27 •i 88 City Mgr. Orrice Date: 9/26/38 Subject: 9/27/38 Council Meeting - enclosure Dear Etta: As a ;property owner, living at 960 8th Place, I agree with the sentiments expressed in the enclosed and your stand voting against the moratorium. Sincerely, 7- September 2'17, 1988 To whom it may concern: I am writing this letter to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission so that I can express my feelings to the people involved in making the decisions that effect my community. ; P 271988 I recently received word about your moratorium on residential property development along the strip adjoining Pacific Coast Highway. At first my reaction was to be upset. I thought, what is happening to my city. I liked it the way that It was when I first bought my home in 1980. We have had to put up with and adjust to so many things in this area. These are effects of decisions that your group, or your colleagues have made. I do not like what has occurred around TWENTY-FIRST STREET in the last eight years. I imagine that your thinking involves considerations beyond the impact on the people who reside in the area. I also thought about the effect that this plan might have with regard to my personal balance sheet. The financial impact of encouraging commercial development must be a motivating factor for you ail. So, I became confused. I slept on it. Then, I started to be more specific in my observations. I am not here on earth to be buried with a positive balance sheet on my gravestone, alone. I have noticed that the area east of PCH has become populated by many more families with children than were living here when we moved here in 1980. This observation relates to my true feelings about this matter. I think that your position sholuld be to NOT encourage further non-residential development. I think that our duty is to provide an environment for our children that will make their world a better place to raise their kids. More malls, apartment buildings, less parking, more traffic, less sate streets??? One last example: what will happen to the trees, flowers and vegetables that the kids who live along the strip have planted? It will be a shame to bull doze and cement over the mark that these kids' want to leave. The proposed consideration will effect many people. Please look beyond the simple considerations and respect the suture that I want for my city, too. 4P;D_ a� Sr S -r• 14.B 901 16th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 9025'1 October 3, 1988 City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach c/o Planning and Environmental Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 9025'1 City Mgr, 0tt100 Concerning: Extension of or revised interim ordinance prohibiting residential development in the Multi -Use Corridor. Dear Members of the City Council: The moratorium is discriminatory. All building activities should be included in it. I live immediately East of the Multi -Use Corridor in an R-1 zone and am concerned about the encroachment of commercial building into the residential zone. Since houses on both sides of Raymond Avenue are all single -Family residences in an R-1 zone, the eastern boundary of the MUC between 16th and 17th Streets should be moved somewhere west of Raymond Avenue. I encourage you to do all you can to preserve the ocean views which are presently enjoyed in the area. That is surely commendable. However, construction of commercial height lowers the quality of life on the hill in other ways due to the tunnel effect on wind and sound, and consideration sould be given to those aspects. OF course, I am concerned about the possibility of damage resulting From hillside construction. I have in mind the house on Fourteenth Street which collapsed during construction activities on Pacific Coast Highway. The City has the responsibility for such events. Yours truly, -yr). I . Lois M. Clemons 901 16th Street Hermosa Beach, CA S025'± October 3, 1966 City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach c/o Planning and Environmental Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 9025`± /di CT City Mgr. Orrice Re: Extension of interim ordinance prohibiting residential development within the Multi -Use Corridor Members of the City Council, IF a moratorium on residential construction is continued For the Multi -Use Corridor, it is evident that the Council is acting for the benefit of developers and real estate speculators and not interested in the preservation of existing community areas. The person who seeks to refurbish or rebuild a dwelling is penalized while the commercial developer has Free rein. IF there is to be a moratorium, it should be on any building activity, and such a moratorium should be in effect until all outstanding issues are addressed. Much of the MCU is currently zoned R-1 and R-2. We must preserve our residential areas and bring the General Plan into alignment with our zoning, which has recently been much debated. The spectre of new commercial development, especially so close to residential areas, brings with it a number of sticky questions. First is the,question of environmental impact. The MUC is For the most part on sandy loam with very steep hills. The problems with topography are added to those of general quality of life - traffic, view obstruction, etc. Liability For Future problems due to water seepage and earthquake safety also need to be addressed. Height limitations For commercial building construction should be predicated From the height of the lowest property contour point, or the lowest city property point bordering the property, whichever is lower. In addition a review of the regulations which allow for a 10+ Foot extension in height for utility purposes should be reviewed, since currently the code has no specific requirements or dimensions, asking only reasonable construction. Over the years the City Council has vacated numerous pieces of property for the benefit of commercial developers. What will be the pattern of the Future For areas such as Raymond Ave. when a developer has the choice of putting a strip center 150 Feet From the Pacific Coast Highway or vacating the street so he can build all the way From PCH? A major question to be addressed is traffic. It's evident there is disregard For PCH traffic Flow through the MUC. The building setbacks are inadequate to accommodate the ever- increasing traffic load, not to mention '-t5ft plus buildings with no side setbacks. The new MUC construction at 16th St. and PCH completely ignores ingress and egress and will have a horrendous impact not only on PCH traffic, but also on residential parking. Under city code, there was no scrutiny for public traffic impact study. The shopping center bounded by PCH and Pier Ave. indicates the lack of city concern For traffic as left hand turns continue to be allowed across the double lines in and out of the Shopping Center on Pier Ave. A simple corrective action would be to break the double lines or create an island. Blockage of access to parking For commercial buildings on the west side of PCH between 2nd and 3rd Streets is common knowledge. The city has elected to rent, at a nominal Fee, the private use of a lot to the Firm causing the blockage. This has curtailed the smooth Flow of traffic and ease of parking required on the congested Highway. What are the residents to look for in the future as the commercial areas move Further into the Multi -Use Corridor? The judgement of the council is called into question in the light of recent actions regarding the sale of city -owned property. The city's presentation of the bid was certainly in'conFlict with the intent of state laws regarding notification to the buyer of hazardous waste problems. The conduct of the city is questionable since it had exposure to hazardous waste cleanup regulations in the past. What other surprises do we have waiting For us? What other bidder may need to be saved From a questionable escrow at the last minute? At issue is the impact of MUC development on the east side of PCH. Aside From the topographic problems, this area is the largest R-1 and R-2 area in the city. The Council needs to approach the whole question in an honest realistic manner, preserving our community atmosphere. Otherwise, the Santa Fe valley property could shift to an extended State Highway or even a MUC, since that would have the least environmental impact on the City. Yours, H. B. Clemons Copies to Huston T. Carlyle Jr., Jananne Sharpless, Allen Hendrix, Paul C. Taylor, Davis Lund October 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 11, 1988 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 19-96, HBMC AND ESTABLISHING THE RATE FOR METER FEES IN LOT "H" (74 14TH STREET) TO TWENTY-FIVE CENTS PER HOUR Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Ordinance, and authorize a transfer of funds from the Parking Fund's Unappropriated Fund balance to the Parking Enforcement Equipment Account, in the amount of $8,064, for the installation of meters in Lot H (74 14th street). Staff further recommends that the City Council amend Section 19-96, to reflect a change in parking meter fees for Lot H. Such fees to be five (.05) cents for 12 minutes, ten (.10) cents for 24 minutes, and twenty-five (.25) cents for one (1) hour. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of September 13, 1988 your Honorable Body authorized the installation of motorcycle/moped parking in Lot H, and $8,064 for the the installation of parking meters. California Vehicle Code §22508 requires that the fixing of parking meter fees shall be by Ordinance. A Public Hearing is also procedure in the establishing of parking meter fees. Analysis: The City Council directed Staff to set the fees for operation of the parking meters in Lot H, at an amount that would be an incentive. In comparison, all other meter rates are fifty (.50) cents per hour. Additionally, fees to park in the VPD lots (Lots A, B, & C) are two ($2) dollars during the summer months, and one ($1) dollar during the winter months. Monies for the purchase and installation of meters in this lot, was not budgeted for this fiscal year. It is therefore necessary to transfer the funds from another source. CONCUR: n Noon, Director General Services evin B. North City Manager 1 Respectfully submitted, Joan Noon, Director by ilL47Ale/-e4,C -cr Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 19-96 HBMC, ESTABLISHING THE RATE FOR METER FEES IN LOT H (74 14TH STREET) TO TWENTY-FIVE CENTS PER HOUR WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that use of Lot H will be best served by installing parking spaces for motorcycle/moped parking and; WHEREAS, to create incentive for motorcycle/moped operators to utilize Lot H for such purpose and; WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code §22508 requires that the fixing of parking meter fees shall be by Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 19-96 HBMC Parking meter zones established; fifteen minute spaces specified, be amended to read, "The parking meter rates throughout the City shall be twenty-five ($0.25) cents per half-hour, excepting those meters located in Lot H, which shall be twenty-five ($0.25) cents per hour." SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. //// //// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of October 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 October 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 11, 1988 SUBJECT: THIRD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS -- REDESIGNATING AREAS 9B & 7 FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY, AND AREA 9C FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DENSITY LOCATION: REFER TO ATTACHED MAPS INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation The Planning Commission and Staff recommend adoption of the attached Resolution amending the General Plan designation of the subject areas. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of September 6, 1988, recommended that the City Council amend the General Plan in the areas designated on the attached maps. A careful analysis of the subject areas was conducted when studying the General Plan/Zoning inconsistency areas. The City changed the Zoning Map as follows: Areas 9B & 7 from R-2 to R -2B Area 9C to remain R-3 Abstract The proposed General Plan amendment will bring the General Plan and Zoning Map into consistency for the locations listed above. Analysis Additional General Plan amendments to correct other inconsistencies are scheduled with the 4th quarter amendments. The amendments listed above will correct the inconsistencies studied between April and July, 1988. Analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of September 6, 1988. 1 1 CONTINUED -- CC General Plan Amendment CONCUR: ichael Schubach Planning Director ,-....,n:-.,/e!'S# evin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachments 1 Location Maps 2. Resolution 88- 3. P.C. Resolution 88-76 4. P.C. Staff Report of 9/6/88 5. P.C. Minutes of 9/6/88 6. Staff Review Minutes of 8/4/88 a/pcsrgp 2 An• rew`Pe Associate k'lanner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on October 11, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The lots in the subject areas 9B & 7 are of sufficient size to be designated medium density, and the lots in area 9C are already developed with high density development; B. Redesignating the subject areas 9B & 7 to medium density and area 9C to high density will bring the General Plan and zoning into consistency; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby amend the General Plan map to redesignate the areas as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Redesignate area 9B from Low Density to Medium Density, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-10 inclusive, 23-32 inclusive of Wilson and Lind's Tract. - Lots 2-6 inclusive, 1-19 inclusive of Glorietta Tract. - Lots 1, 2, 7, portion 9, 10, 11 of Block 85 of Second Addition of Hermosa Beach Tract. - Condominium Tract Maps #42019, 41234, 38826, 13703, 10651, 6031. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Tract 7594. 2. Redesignate area 7 from Low Density to Medium Density, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-4 inclusive of the Johnson and Newman's Camino Real Tract. - Lots 2-22 inclusive of the J. M. Floores Subdivision. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 - Lots 1-4 inclusive, 17-22 inclusive, portions of 15 & 16, lots 6-13 inclusive and 24-27 inclusive of the Angela Heights Tract. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Tract 21785. 3. Redesignate area 9C from Low Density to High Density, legally described as follows: - Lot 1 of Tract 38826. - Portion of lot 9, Block 85 of the Hermosa Beach Tract. Second Addition to the PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of October, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS T' OR CITY CLERK 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /persqtr3 TY ATTORNEY CAREA . 9B Area Overview c REDESIGNATE FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY (numbers correspond.to detail maps) 0 ST - 11. 1 RAZ.$ ST 2 -Z18 A • .-4,/"? ST 1c `i Z$ Z 3 t�.:Z_IES 7F% *ST 0 M 4 • . 0 z c J AREA 9B Detail Map 1 c 6 N AREA 9B. Detail Map 2 7b .5T/ET .. dm •• . . 0 VP .23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ..," (D C) OD C) C) ED C) ED ED3 SHEET 3 ® 0 1 7 8 • A, • ts. f 70 4'1'1! , e :8 5 Ilwiz 4 40 1 45.4 f 4'6 ,04 • e 7'A 0 0• 11 12 0 13 "Jo 0 2 1-6 ,57-RErs -7 0 14 0 3 0 0 4 4 0 16 0 17 40 J 'aqu .10 J 60 'o 13 1$ ---- 4 o ! � O k '1 60 I 60 tc AREA- 9B Detail Map 3 6 fh ST7? E 7-- I .a,0 � 1 .4O.p ' cin I O $ 4810 1 18,0 9610 O 4 9810 J6 1 .,at 5I I O yc 7 .56 1 IQ1. 0 JO 616 0 BLK. 6.45 JO4! 949 r1Q9 4/3 * •33 85 41 • :40 • 1 /ie./ 13 y 4J�C .® 45 • ntt/ 1 rem *Is I I 1 J49 1 219 ,4381 d! '.;-J.faim LorWM.."' 1 4. qI ®44 40 ' • 1 4.1/0... /02.0 /41,. 44 ; 74x4 j O31� S M V Nh • 1o�Y tti ---Q-- a�----- °ja$a4 „s16 , en n O 41 I 4190.1 0 O s 6. Ck 51 0 '! 40 """; u1 /s J • J AREA 9B Detail Map 4 //6 02 03 .nth BYTE E7- 57.51 1 • I .52.50• � . 142 JI 25 ul ?G ,� cA 4770,-..n! AC7Or"•1' /,OCO'ol N N 10031 hi o �2 • a 5I.53 ( SI50 I .51.57 114214 G6 • Oj 7 111.4 O 4 11'7 19 5 ilio,•• 211.13 • • 08 /6 m 41 • • 69. v 117.09' IOs It • S.�.B rt/ 97 • 't�s 1 'taw �G; t•I.f I•-7 . .,i l 3 ✓ �J'Yfv•gr 1.)),.1. /05 91 -- ` i AREA 7 Area Overview REDESIGNATE FROM LOW. DENSITY TO. MEDIUM DENSITY (numbers correspond to detail maps) -18th srREEr N C /47.5. 60 ZuOI0' 9 /51/0 AREA 7 Detail Map 1 /5s/7 w 10 G•370`" /56 rn • V77Ot o.$ SO /6394 ti 7750t 7 N.7/�/7%✓ /6x0.0/ 776 3lS,yf.•, tss .41 65./ .21 S.. 17TH y 0 cc\ Z co 45 69.85 11 65Q" t'' /546.6 O12 Fi230ta. ,473 85 4Q W /4762 • /45662% �d Cn 13Ago t t /54.96 07'.•17 . O 485 .,," .rB,o• /e...hll /9 I.50 ,34 600 0 2 39501' ,/1 O6.4p01' //5 43.85 /S w 39801'' •4g 51 15 5- U /a. .SJ 1/0 - 4,06e' ,50.11 O11 6,01,4`. O 1 ,a .\ ,30 4750" 25 /64.32 4,1/0'°2• 5 /493 o .150'°24 /7 N ,oj 65 4 7/ 145 5T 70.65 4,451Y1 I. 22 ,61 /do - /0 13 66339 n2o 45001r lZ tea„ 21,96/ 0 /2 4836' 00 .5 o 9 15 b !8Th dC 05 4 - 1, `ID 6% AREA 7 Detail Map 2 C' 7 ST ti O4 z6s40I a3 93 O3 97i.! 268010' a ti 2 0 ® 9 'IQ FO k^ 6860/x' j '^ '1h ,� 4s . O -6 1• ,as !7 $ 17TH ST.e AREA 7 Detail Map 3 ST. 122 ' • , . 21- . _• 20 0 19 . 0 • 18 , ; 0 17 •..i O 16 0 .. 15 0 14 i0 13 al, x616-• . FON 0 , t• 44►61r 0 //4 47 C . J CAREA 9C REDESIGNATE FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DENSITY C ZONING: MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) tth STREET W cr cc v 71 �r ST/?EE r . Eathgrztutth gaatrr-iaig 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND RECOMMENDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 6, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The lots in the subject areas 9B & 7 are of sufficient size to be designated medium density, and the lots in area 9C are already developed with high density development; B. Redesignating the subject areas 9B & 7 to medium density and area 9C to high density will bring the General Plan and zoning into consistency; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend that the General Plan map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Redesignate area 9B from Low Density to Medium Density, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-10 inclusive, 23-32 inclusive of Wilson and Lind's Tract. - Lots 2-6 inclusive, 1-19 inclusive of Glorietta Tract. - Lots 1, 2, 7, portion 9, 10, 11 of Block 85 of Second Addition of Hermosa Beach Tract. Condominium Tract Maps #42019, 41234, 38826, 13703, 10651, 6031. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Tract 7594. 2. Redesignate area 7 from Low Density to Medium Density, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-4 inclusive of the Johnson and Newman's Camino Real Tract. - Lots 2-22 inclusive of the J. M. Floores Subdivision. -/5-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c c Lots 1-4 inclusive, 17-22 inclusive, portions of 15 & 16, lots 6-13 inclusive and 24-27 inclusive of the Angela Heights Tract. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Tract 21785. 3. Redesignate area 9C from Low Density to High Density, legally described as follows: - Lot 1 of Tract 38826. - Portion of lot 9, Block 85 of the Second Addition to the Hermosa Beach Tract. VOTE: AXES: Comms.Edwards,Ingell,Ketz,Rue,Chmn.Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-76 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of September 6, 198 ice J.Oes Peirce, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary 7-05f/1768 Date T/persqtr3 -16- August 22, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission September 6, 1988 SUBJECT: THIRD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS -- REDESIGNATING AREAS 9B & 7 FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY, AND AREA 9C FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DENSITY LOCATION: REFER TO ATTACHED MAPS INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution recommending amending the designation of the subject areas. Background A .careful analysis of the subject areas was conducted in conjunction with the consideration of changing the zoning. As a result of the analysis, both the Planning Commission and City Council determined that the areas should be zoned as follows: Area 9B & 7 from R-2 to R -2B. Area 9C to remain R-3. Analysis Based on the determined zoning for the subject areas, it will be necessary to change the General Plan designations for the purpose of developing consistency between the General Plan and zoning as required by state law. The size of the lots, age of the existing dwellings, and the composition of the existing development were important in determining the zoning for the subject -yeas. 7 Michae Schu.ach T/pcsrqtr3 /7 Planning Director MAPS FOR REDESIGNATING AREAS Please refer to City Council Resolution for maps. THIRD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — REDESIGNATING AREAS 9B AND 7 FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND AREA 9C FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DENSITY Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated August 22, 1988. A careful analysis of the subject areas was conducted in conjunction with the consideration of changing the zoning. As a result of the analysis, both the Planning Commission and City Council determined that the areas should be zoned as follows: Area 9B and Area 7 from R-2 to R -2B; and Area 9C -to remain R-3. Based on the determined zoning for the subject areas, it will be necessary to change the general plan designations for the purpose of developing consistency between the general plan and zoning as required by state law. The size of the lots, age of the existing dwellings, and the composition of the existing development were important in determining the zoning for the subject areas. Therefore, staff recommended adoption of the proposed resolution recommending amending the designation of the subject areas. ' Public Hearing opened and closed by Chmn. Peirce, as no citizens came forward to speak on this matter. MOTION by Chmn. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to approve Resolution P.C. 88-76, as recommended by staff. AYES: Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None -/9 - P.C. Minutes 9/6/88 MINUTES OF THE STAFF REVIEW MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 4, 1988 IN CITY HALL AT 10:00 A.M. PRESENT: Andy Perea, Associate Planner Harold Anschel, Senior Building Inspector Gary Wheaton, Public Works Engineer Technician APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Mr. Perea to approve the minutes of July 21, 1988, second by Mr. Anschel. Mr. Wheaton abstained PROJECT GP 88-3 3RD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REDESIGNATED AREA 9B & AREA 7 FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY, AN AREA 9C FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DENSITY. Mr. Perea described the areas in question (see attached map). Mr. Perea added that the areas are located within a General Plan/ Zoning inconsistency area. The City Council recently studied these areas and rezoned the areas as follows: Area 9B and Area 7 to - R2 -B Area 9C to _ R-3 Therefore, the proposed General Plan Amendment will bring the General Plan into consistency with the zoning. Motion by Mr. Perea to recommend a negative declaration, second by Mr. Anschel. No objection, so ordered. Meeting adjourned. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and com- plete record of the action taken by the Staff Review Committee at their regular meeting of August 4, 1988 • , Andrew Perea, 'Chairman Date. ic— October 6, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 11, 1988 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES, INC. FOR CIVIL AND CRIMINAL MEDIATION SERVICES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached con- tract between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles Coun- ty Bar Association, Dispute Resolution Services, Inc., (DRS) for Civil and Criminal Mediation Programs; and approve the attached lease agreement between DRS and the City for office space in the Community Center. Background: This item was originally presented to the City Council at your meeting of September 27, 1988. While Council comments favored the concept of this program, the matter was held over to this meeting to answer questions regarding the program's budget. Analysis: As noted at your last meeting, the preliminary budget figures previously supplied were "ballpark" estimates of expected maximum costs. DRS has now developed and supplied the attached budget, which is considerably revised and provides much more detail on the proposed expenditures. Notably, equipment costs have been removed from Hermosa Beach's share, and equipment estimates have been revised downward to reflect more accurate projections of expected costs, e.g., equipment hardware and software costs have been revised from $6,500 to $4,350. Kevin :. ort.. raft City Manager KBN/ld cc: Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. 3. PROGRAM BUDGET This budget will cover the period Oct. 1, 1988 to June 30, 1989 Agencys Los Angeles County Bar Association Dispute Resolution Servvices, Inc. Authorised Signature. , Official Title 4recto LD E -ITEM 1A. Program Staff Salaries Age Pr 3 219 o9ry Stott Fringe Benefits L2. Consultant Services 2A. Space/Facilities 28. Equipment Purchase 22. Travel Training 20. Insurance 2E. Operating Expenses 2F. Audit Expenses detailed below are for nine ( 9) mths. Contact Persons Lauren Burton Telephones (213) 450-5252 FUNDING SOURCES L. A, Co City of Redondo Bch. Miscellaneous 750 -0- 00 4 315 -0- -0- -0- 1,485 -0- $19, 960 $ 15,000 • City Use Orly ( ) Original ( ) Modification No. 1 IN-KIND CITY OF Hermosa Beach TOTAL BUDGET $ 9,601 5,870 30,608 ,o- -o- 787 -0- 3,092 750 300 200 110 540 -0- 3,396 5,050 -0- '— 1,225 _ 5 -0- -0- 400 _n_ _ 303 7,835 315 --0- 1 -0- $10,211 • $ 7,500 $ 52,671 ':Effective Date Reviewed by Community Mediation Programs AGENCY (South Bay) 4. PROGRAM BUDGET NARRATIVE LII] E -ITEMS • PEDGEM BERSEGA0 TOTAL BEACH BFB 1A. Staff Salaries Indirect Administrative costs DRS Director - 9% of full time x 3 months 625 -0- -0- x 6 months 1,338 -0- -0- Grants Administrator - 9% of full time x 3 months 400 -0- -0- x 6 months 856 -0- -0- *Administrative Overhead: 10% of total payroll * 2,101 -0- -0- Direct Program costs Program Director (Community Mediation Programs) 15% of full time x 3 months 1,313 433 880 x 6 months 2.809 927 1,882 Program Coordinator (South Bay) 12 weeks @ 21-hrs. /wk x-$32/hr. 3, 024 998 2,026 26 weeks @ 25 hrs./wk x $13/hr. 8,450 2,789 5,661 Secretary/Receptionist 15% of full time x 3 months 698 230 468 19% of full time x 6 months 1,494 493 1,001 *500 Volunteer Hours (Mediators, *7,500 -0- -0- Intake Workers, etc.) @ $15/hr. Payroll Taxes and Benefits 3,092 78 7 1,59 7 22% of total payroll minus $1,530 (medical for Coordinator) *In-kind contribution **Denotes sane in-kind contribution Subtotal 33, 700** 6 , 6 57 13,515 Dispute Eesoiution cervices . Commit), Mediation Programs AGENCY (South Bav) (4. PROGRAM BUDGET NARRATIVE CONT.) OTHER LIN E-ITF?!S (3C -2F) PROGRAM TOTAL REDCNDO BEACH HII A BF'.ACH Space/Facilities/Rent DRS Headquarters - 5% 520 sq. ft. x $1.25/Sq. Ft. 293 -0- -0- 1,939 -0- -0- O mm ity Mediation Programs - 15% of 1,064 sq. ft. x $1.35 sq. ft. x 9 months Janitorial/water/utilities $36. mo. x 9 months 324 -0- -0- South Bay Office Hermosa Beach Community Civic Center $60/month x 9 months 540 540 -0- 'KSouth Bay Free Clinic *Redondo Beach Community Resources Center *Baker and Burton (Meeting space for mediation sessions @ $10/session x 30 sessions *300 -0- -0- Mileage/Parking 150 miles/mo. @ $.23/mile x 9 months 315 -0- -0- Misc. parking @ $40/mo. x 9 months 360 -D- -0- Mediator Trainings 8 intensive trainings - supplies @ $40/training 320 -0- -0- 3 continuous education trainings - supplies 120 -0- -0- @ $40/training *Training facility rental - El Camino College and Redondo Beach Community Resources Center 11 meetings @ $10/meeting *110 -0- -0- Equipment Lease/Rental/Purchase Conputer hardware and printer 2,800 -0- -0- Misc. software and modems 800 -0- -0- Equipment maintenance @ $50/mo. x 9 months 450 -0- -0- . * In-kind contribution ** Denotes in-kind contribution sane CONTINUED CONTINUED CONTINUED • (4. PROGRAM BUDGET NARRATIVE CONT.) (Cont.) L spate netioluLluu JCavluea • Commtm ity Mediation Programs AGENCY (South Bay) OTHER LIN E-ITEKS (]C -2E) P 70►TAL �4�A BEACH i�Ci�IDO BEACH • .� Office furniture *Desk, chairs Computer stand (secured) *200 800 -0 Consultants Computer consultant - purchase, installation of hardware and software, and program design for data base - 15% of total Community Mediation Programs cost 750 -0- -0- Insurance 400 -0- -0- Audit 315 -0- -0- Operating Expenses Consumable supplies @ $75/mo. x 9 months 675 303 -0- Telephone @ $200/mo. x 9 months 1,800 -0- 900 Postage @ $50/mo. x 9 months 450 -0- ..0_ Outside printing costs @ $200/mo. x 9 months 1,800 -0- 58 5 Production costs @ $100/mo. x 9 months. 900 -0- -0- Messenger and delivery @ $40/mi. x 9 months 360 -0- -0- Subscription/publications @ $50/mo. x 9 months 450 -0- -0- Advertising @ $50/month x 9 months 450 -0- -0- General misc. expenses @ $50/mo.•x 9 months 450 -0- -0- Volunteer Recognition Awards 500 -0- -0- *In-kind contribution ** Denotes same in-kind contribution 1 _ 52,671.** 7,500 15,000 r !'�• September 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of September 27, 1988 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES, INC. FOR CIVIL AND CRIMINAL MEDIATION SERVICES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council approve the attached contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar Association, Dispute Resolution Services, Inc., (DRS) for Civil and Criminal Mediation Programs; and approve the attached lease agreement between DRS and the City for office space in the Community Center. BACKGROUND The City Council approved funding of this program in the amount of $10,000 for the 88/89 budget, subject to joint funding by other South Bay Cities and the County of Los Angeles. The funds are incorporated in the City Prosecutor's budget. The total amount to be expended by Hermosa Beach is $7,500. ANALYSIS Dispute Resolution Services (DRS) has received funding from the City of Redondo Beach in the amount of $15,000 and a County match of $28,560. Therefore the total cost of the program is $.;1,667. The budget breakdown is attached. Part of that budget includes office space in the Hermosa Beach Community Center. DRS will occupy a small office (200 sq. ft.) part-time and their rent will conform to the existing rental policy. The attached fact sheets explain in detail the program that will be provided to the City. It is anticipated this program will enable many departments of the City to better resolve complaints, problems, and conflicts that are encountered with the public to the satisfaction of all concerned. It is hoped that many problems encountered and handled by the Police Dept. can now be handled through this process. While this program appears to address the needs of City Staff, it will definitely provide the public with solutions to problems that perhaps, to date, they felt were not being addressed. DRS will also provide in-house training to City Staff in Conflict Resolution techniques in order to enhance our ability to resolve problems encountered every day in the work place. Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copelnd Finance Administrator 2 - _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICESL INC. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 27th day of September , 1988, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR AS- SOCIATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES, INC. a non-profit or- ganization, hereinafter referred to as "DRS": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that the services ren- dered by the DRS are of a valuable public benefit to the citizens of Hermosa Beach, California; and WHEREAS, the CITY has appropriated funds to be used by the DRS pursuant to this Agreement, for the rendering of services to the citizens of Hermosa Beach, California and that said ser- vices funded by this Agreement are for a valid public purpose; and WHEREAS, DRS is a non-profit organization which provides services to the general public for Dispute Resolution Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I The CITY agrees to provide funds to DRS in an amount Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500) for fiscal year 88/ 89 beginning Oct. 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989. II The DRS agrees, in consideration of the aforesaid cove- nants, that preferential priority assistance be given to the residents of Hermosa Beach, California. III DRS agrees to match funds from Los Angeles County. IV DRS agrees to submit to CITY in June of contract year a report on services performed and matching funds raised. CITY shall issue payment in the amount of $7,500 upon execution of this Agreement. V DRS shall make its report to the HERMOSA BEACH ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be directed by the DRS to the ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. At any time when the CITY does not have an individual servicing as ACM, the duties of the ACM shall reside in the office of the CITY MANAGER or his designee. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VI The CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH or any of its duly authorized representatives shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of the DRS which are directly pertinent to this Agreement for the purposes of making audits, examinations, ex- cerpts and transcriptions. Nothing in this Agreement shall re- quire the release of any names of any persons who use the ser- vices of the DRS to the CITY or any other person. Such records shall not become public records of the CITY under this Agreement unless otherwise specified herein. VII The DRS shall maintain records of all details with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement, for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment, unless authoriza- tion to remove them sooner is granted in writing by the CITY. VIII This Agreement is terminable upon the giving of thirty (30) days written notificaton by either party. Further, the CITY may terminate said Agreement immediately if it determines that the funds provided by the CITY are not being used for the purpose specified in this Agreement. IX The DRS shall hold the CITY free and harmless from any and all liability and claims for damages by reason of any injury 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 to any person or persons, including but not limited to, the DRS, or to property of any kind whatsoever and to whomsoever belong- ing, including but not limited to the DRS, from any causes whatsoever in connection with the activities of DRS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the. 27th day of September , 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Y ATTOR 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation By MAYOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES By EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 27th day of Sejtember 19 88 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Los An:eles Count Bar Assoc. Dis•ute Resolution Services, Inc. DRS Lessee . A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to' as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of Nine (9), Months commencing on the, 1st day of October `, 19TS , and ending on the 30th day of _June ,19 89 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 6B, 200 s.. ft. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: $60 per month Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 3. Room 6B is to be occupied by lessee Monday/ Wednesday/Friday and Tuesday/Thursday from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: ,Mediation Program And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or -a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the s -ample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. 2 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event -the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli- gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall, if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac- tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained because of Lessee's use of the premises. 3 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Los Angeles County Bar Assoc Dis•ute Resolution Services ,_2830 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be_grantedas an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. 4 ATTEST: PROVED A TI FOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 5 LESSEE: Dispute Lauren But ton Resolution Director Services Ct,mtut.rit‘ `.fk_ liation Pt 'trams Loretta Francesco. Program Director Main Office: 2830 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica. CA 90405 (213) 450-5252 West Hollywood Office: 543 N. Fairfax Avenue Los Angeles. CA 90036 (213) 854-0122 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY MEDIATION PROGRAM Community Mediation Programs (formerly the Neighborhood Justice Center) is a program of Dispute Resolution Services (DRS), a non- profit corporation of the Los Angeles County Bar Association. The Program will serve all residents of Hermosa Beach without regard to race, sex, national origin, religion, age, income, sexual preference or disability; however, special emphasis is given to meeting the needs of those persons who have the least access to the formal judicial system - low income, minority, elderly and disabled persons. SERVICES The following services will be provided to the City of Hermosa Beach: 1. Civil Dispute Resolution Services - This program is designed to serve persons who are experiencing conflict and are involved in an ongoing social or economic relationship, such as landlords and tenants, neighbors or neighborhoods, family members, roommates, consumers and merchants, friends, employers and employees, and businesspersons. A part-time Program Coordinator will assess the presenting problem, and if it is appropriate for mediation and both parties are willing to participate, a mediation will be scheduled. At the mediation, a trained volunteer mediator will assist the parties to put their dispute into manageable terms and help them to arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution of their conflict, usually in the form of a settlement agreement. 2. Information and Referral - If, after assessing a person's problem, it is found that the case is not appropriate for mediation, the caller is referred to an agency, city depart- ment or social service organization that will eliminate or alle- viate the presenting need. A referral list of agencies serving Hermosa Beach residents will be developed and kept current to assist with this service. 3. Community Outreach - Outreach activities will be targeted to Hermosa Beach residents and will include: A Non -Profit Corporation of the Los Angeles County Bar Association -networking with personnel of social services agencies serving Hermosa Beach residents - an informational meeting with representatives from local social service agencies to announce the availability of the services - presentations at meetings of community groups/ bar associations and law enforcement officials - presentations at Hermosa Beach Police Department roll calls - a series of three workshops for City personnel to orient them to the services available and encourage referrals to the Program - a presentation on local Channel 10 Cable television PROGRAM EVALUATION Follow up calls are made to all participants in a mediation thirty days after the mediation is held. Quarterly follow up statistics reports are compiled using the results of the follow up calls. NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1. A Community Task Force composed of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach community leaders will be formed during the October 1 - December 30 quarter. The Task Force will develop and conduct a needsassessmentsurvey, to assess the specific needs for mediation/conciliation services in Hermosa Beach -Redondo Beach. Interviews will be conducted with local human service providers, heads of City departments, and law enforcement officials. The Task Force will produce a written report based on these interviews by March 31, 1989. 2. Staff will meet with the City Prosecutor, City Attorney, Chief of Police, Director of General Services and other department heads as deemed appropriate, to explore the feasibility of a direct referral system for minor misdemeanors and local ordinance violations. Information/recommendations from these meetings will be included in the Task Force report. During the April 1 - June 30 quarter, staff will begin implementation of recommendations set forth in the Task Force report referenced above. STAFF Recruitment, hiring, and training of a part-time Program Coordinator will take place in October, 1988. Volunteers will be recruited, selected and trained during the October 1 - December 30 quarter, using the attached Training Manual for Mediators as a guide. In the interim period, our existing pool of certified volunteer mediators will be available to conduct mediations for Hermosa Beach residents. All mediators will adhere to the DRS Ethics and Standards Manual (attached). REPORTING Reports on levels of service delivery and progress made towards meeting goals and objectives according to the workplan and timeline attached will be submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach on a quarterly basis. FEE POLICY A case processing fee between 0-$10 is requested when a case is opened. This fee is waived for low-income clients. Family income is included in the statistical information that is taken on•all callers. Family Law (marital dissolution) cases are charged an hourly sliding scale fee based on joint income of the parties. Fees range from 0 to $75 per hour. Business cases are charged a 0-$40-$75 sliding scale hourly fee, based on total assets of the business. SPACE The Hermosa Beach Community Mediation Program Office will be located in the Hermosa Beach Civic Center on Pier Ave. The office will be open on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 12:00 to 5:00 p.m., and on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 9:00 to 12:00 a.m. A telephone will be installed with a local number and call forwarding, so that when the Hermosa Beach Office is not open, calls will automatically be forwarded to the main office in Santa Monica at no charge to the caller. Mediations will be held at the South Bay Free Clinic Counseling Center in Redondo Beach. Evening mediations can also be held at the law offices of Baker and Burton at 515 Pier Avenue in Hermosa Beach. This workplan will cover the period October HERMOSA BEACH PROGRAM'WORKPLAN 1988 to June 30, 1989 Agency Dispute Resolution Services Program Community Mediation Programs Objectives r Program Quarter 1 2 3 4 Hermosa Bch Total Program Total Unit of t arvicu A. DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM Total Persons Served 1. Information and Referral 2. Intake Interviews (complainants and respondents) 3. Cases Opened 4. Mediations, conciliations and mitigations 5. Follow-up interviews B. OUTREACH PROGRAM 1. Informational meeting for social service agencies 2. Interview on Cable Television 3. Develop and produce outreach literature 4. Conduct workshops for City personnel 5. Meet with personnel of social service agencies and City departments, to disseminate information and litera- ture, and to encourage appropriate referrals C. NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1. Form six -member Community Task Force 2. Prepare Needs Assessment Survey instrument 3. Conduct Needs Assessment Interviews 4. Meet with City Prosecutor, City Attorney, Chief of Police and Director of General Services 5. Prepare Task Force Report • **Needs Assessment Interviews will be conducted during the second 'quarter of this program year. A list of agencies, etc. to be interviewed will be prepared by the Community Task Force. 60.132 132 324 41 90 90 221 23 40 40 103 13 20 20 53 6 11 11 28 9 18 18 45 1 1 1 4 6 1 ** 2 2 1 1 1 as needed 1 3 6 16 1 1 4 1 2,160 1,476 684 351 189 297 persons persons • interviews cases sessions contacts meeting workshops meetings Task Force Survey Meetings Report SSA BEACH PR00RAM WORKPLAN This workplan will cover the period Agency Dispute Resolution Services Program Community Mediation Programs Objectives Program Quarter 1 2 3 4 Hermosa Bch Total Program Total Unit of Gorvioo D. TRAINING Recruit, select and train six volunteer mediators E. Implement Task Force recommendations, including direct referrals of minor misdemeanor matters and City ordinance violations, if feasibility of same has been determined. 6 25 volunteers 2. TIME LINE - HERMCSA BEACH Agency Dispute Resolution Services Program Community Mediation Programs ACTION STEPS JULY 1234 AUG 12 ]4 SEPT 12 34123 OCT NOV 1234 DEC 123 JAN 1234 rEa 1234 MAR 1234 APR 1234 MAY 1234 JUN 1234 1. Recruit, hire and train part- time program coordinator 2. 1ecruit, select and train volunteer mediators 3. Develop and produce outreach literature 4. Foran a Hermosa .Beach Camiunity Task Force 5. Prepare Needs Assessment Survey instrument 6. Conduct Needs Assessment Interviews 7. Write Task Force Report 8. Conduct 3 workshops for City personnel 9. Hold informational meeting for social service agencies 10. Interview on Cable TV 11. Provide dispute resolution services to residents of Hermosa Beach (ongoing) 12. Provide information and refer- ral 'services to residents of Hermosa Beach (ongoing) 13. Conduct follow-up interviews (ongoing) . xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx mom x xxxx xxxx x xxxx x x xxxx xxxx x Santa Monica Ar. ..... v7 It., 2. Agency Program • ACTION SUPS JULY 1131 AUG 1234 SEPT 1211 OCT 1231 140V 1131 OLC 1131 JAN 1231 'EB 1231 MAR 1231 APR 1234 MAY 1=]1 JUN 1231 14. Meet with City Attorney, City Prosecutor, Chief of Police and Director of General Services 15. Implement Task Force Recon- mendations N. • x x x x xxxx xxxx xxxx Banta Monica DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES (DRS) SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY MEDIATION PROGRAM BUDGET INCOME City of Hermosa Beach $ 7,500 City of Redondo Beach 15,000 County of Los Angeles (SB2064 Dispute Resolution Program Act) 28,560 Miscellaneous (fees/donations) 607 TOTAL INCOME $51,667 EXPENSES Staff Salaries - Administrative staff - South Bay Program Coordinator 12 wks. @ 21 hrs/wk X $12/hr. 26 wks. @ 25 hrs/wk X $13/hr. Payroll Taxes and Fringe Benefits $ 6,084 3,024 8,450 3,863 TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS $21,421 Consultants (Computer Programmer) Space Facilities/Rent Central Office - 10% of total rent x 9 months 1,500 2,448 Utilities/Janitorial - 10% of total costs x 9 months 315 South Bay Office - Hermosa Beach Community Civic Center $60/month. x 9 months 540 *South Bay Free Clinic - Dispute resolution proceedings $10/session x 30 sessions *300 Equipment Lease/Rental/Purchase Computer hardware and printer 5,000 Miscellaneous software 1,500 Office Furniture 1,000 Copy Machine rental @ $150/mo. x 9 months 1,350 Equipment maintenance 42 $125/mo. x 9 months 1,125 Mileage/Parking 150 miles/mo. @ $ .23/mile x 9 months 315 Miscellaneous parking @ $40/mo. x 9 months 360 Mediator Trainings 8 Intensive trainings - supplies $50/training 400 3 In-service trainings - supplies $50/training 150 * Training facility rental - El Camino College 11 meetings @ $10/meeting. * 110 Insurance 400 Audit 936 Operating Expenses Consumable supplies @ $100/mo. x 9 months 900 r• Telephone Purchase/lease and 9 mos. service 2,250 Postage @ $ 75/mo. x 9 months 675 Copying supplies ID $50/mo. x 9 months 450 Outside printing (0 $200/mo. x 9 months 1,800 Production costs @ $150/mo. x 9 months 1,350 Messenger and delivery @ $40/mo. x 9 months 360 Subscription/publications @ $50/mo. x 9 months 450 Advertising @ $50/mo. x 9 months 450 General miscellaneous expenses Q $50/mo x 9 months 450 Volunteer Recognition Awards 720 * Administrative Overhead: LACBA accounting, word processing, meetings department, public relations, personnel services, etc. 2,142 10% of total payroll TOTAL EXPENSES $51.667 * Denotes In -Kind Contributions 194(946 ETHICS AND STANDARDS MANUAL '�- - FOR 00 NJC VOLUNTEER MEDIATORS © 1987 Los Angeles County Bar Association All rights reserved. 1985-1986 NJC PROJECT COMMITTEE Hon. Laurence Rubin, Chair Richard J. Stone, Vice -Chair Todd Clark Eillen C. Cochran Joseph Cryden Hon. Norman Epstein Gene Kaplan Kate Kaplan Kenneth P. Lezin Jay L. Lichtman Nancy E. Loncke Lee Petillon Bernida M. Reagan Sidney R. Rose Ronald L. Rouda Hon. Philip M. Saeta John A. Schulman Susan R. Stockel Caroline Vincent Anthony Vulin ETHICS AND STANDARDS SUBCOMMITTEE Hon. Philip M. Saeta, Chair Elsa Kievits Irving Miller Ronald L. Rouda Hon. Laurence Rubin Caroline Vincent g. Personal Expertise. Mediators with special expertise in the area of the dispute should not voluntarily disclose that they have such expertise. h. Child Custody Disputes. In child custody disputes, the mediator should explore with the disputants the desirability of meeting with the children. Such a meeting may only be held, however, with the consent of both disputants. i. Constitutional Rights. There is no duty to inform the disputants of their "constitutional rights," such as the right to counsel or the right against self-incrimination. IV. CONFLICT OF INTEREST A. Upon being assigned a mediation, an NJC mediator shall, before accepting the assignment, disclose the following to the NJC staff and to the disputants: 1. Any direct or indirect financial or personal interest in the outcome of the mediation. 2. Any existing or past financial, business, professional or social relationships involving the mediator, his/her family, friends or business colleagues which are likely to affect impartiality or which might reasonably create an appearance of partiality or bias. The foregoing includes relationships with the disputants, their lawyers or witnesses. B. After accepting an assignment, an NJC mediator shall avoid entering into any financial, business, professional or social relationships, or acquiring any financial or personal interest, as described above, which is likely to affect impartiality or which might reasonably create the appearance of partiality or bias. For a reasonable period of time after the mediation has been completed, an NJC mediator shall avoid entering into any such relationship, or acquiring any such interest. C. If either the NJC Director or the mediator determines that a conflict of interest exists between the mediator and the disputants or the dispute, then the mediator shall not be assigned the case or 11 shall be removed from the case if the mediation is already in progress. The fact that a mediator has some personal knowledge of the facts involved in the dispute, or is acquainted with a disputant, shall not, in itself, constitute a conflict of interest. If a disputant asserts the existence of a conflict of interest, the NIC Director shall investigate the underlying facts and make a determination as to whether to proceed with the assigned mediator, to assign a different mediator, or to terminate the mediation. D. An NIC mediator is in a relationship of trust to the parties and shall not, at any time, use confidential information acquired during the mediation to gain personal advantage or advantage for others, or to affect adversely the interest of another. V. NJC PROPRIETARY INFORMATION A. The NJC has significant proprietary interests in its written materials, clients and contacts, which interests are protected under the laws pertaining to copyright, trade marks and trade secrets, as well as other applicable laws. By agreeing to abide by this manual, an NIC mediator recognizes NJC's proprietary interests. B. The NIC encourages private mediation services to promote the public policy of alternative dispute resolution. However, to avoid a conflict of interest or the appearance of such, and to protect NJC's proprietary interests, an NJC mediator who engages in the private practice of mediation shall so , inform the NJC Director. In addition, an NJC A mediator further agrees to the following: 1. He/she shall not solicit any NJC clients or contacts nor make use of his/her affiliation with NJC in private practice. 2. He/she shall not use NJC training manuals or materials or other NJC written materials without the expressed written permission of the NIC Director. 3. Upon termination of his/her status as an NJC mediator, he/she shall deliver to the NJC all NJC training manuals and materials and other NJC written materials. Adopted by the Los Angeles County Bar Association's Neighborhood Justice Center Committee on April 16, 1986. 12 4 CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT In order to preserve the confidentiality of this mediation, the Neighborhood Justice Center and the parties to the mediation agree that the provisions of California Evidence Code Section 1152.5 apply to this mediation. The above paragraph means that, if you agree in writing, everything said in and all papers prepared for or during the mediation session cannot be used in any civil lawsuit unless all parties to the mediation consent to disclosure. The text of the pertinent part of Evidence Code Section 1152.5, is reprinted as follows: "(a) Subject to the conditions and exceptions provided in this section. when persons agree to conduct and participate in a mediation for the purpose of compromising, settling or resolving a dispute: (1) Evidence of anything said or of any admission made in the course of the mediation is not admissible in evidence and disclosure of any such evidence shall not be compelled, in any civil action in which, pursuant to law, testimony can be compelled to be given. (2) Unless the document otherwise provides, no document prepared for the purpose of, or in the course of, or pursuant to, the mediation, or copy thereof, is admissible in evidence, and disclosure of any such document shall not be compelled, in any civil action in which, pursuant to law, testimony can be compelled to be given. (b) Subdivision (a) does not limit the admissibility of evidence if all persons who conducted or otherwise participated in the mediation consent to its disclosure." Agreed to this day of 198_ NEIGHBORHOOD JUSTICE CENTER: By. Authorized Representative 13 PSit 4 S3ION NEIGHBORHOOD JUSTICE CENTER 1320-C Santa Monica Mall, Suite 3 Santa Monica, California 90401 (213)451-8192 Director: LAUREN BURTON Assistant Director: LORETTA FRANCESCO Designed and Printed by General Telephone Company of California d. Outside Observers. Persons who wish to observe a mediation but who are not involved with the dispute must get the prior approval of the NJC Director. e. Legal Advice. 1) No legal advice should be given by the mediator and the mediator should inform the parties that they should not look to the mediator for legal advice. The mediator may raise legal issues on his or her own if it appears this would be helpful in resolving the dispute. 2) Mediators should be supplied neutral informational material on common legal issues that are likely to arise in NJC disputes. Whenever it appears that information on applicable law would be helpful to resolve the dispute, mediators should call such material to the attention of the disputants. 3) When appropriate, the mediator should suggest to the disputants that they may obtain their own outside legal advice and counsel. However, mediators should not refer or recommend matters to themselves or to specific individual attorneys or law firms. Referral may only be made to non-profit public agencies. The NIC staff maintains an extensive information and referrals service for Los Angeles County. 4) Mediators who are attorneys should not voluntarily disclose that they are attorneys. 5) A mediator should not knowingly participate in an illegal agreement, and should notify the parties of any potential illegality of which the mediator is aware. f. Unjust Agreements. Mediators should caution that an unfair or unjust agreement (e.g., a spousal support agreement that is too excessive or insufficient) may not be adhered to and may not be enforceable in court. 10 i. Real Parties in Interest. The real parties in interest in any dispute should be at the mediation session from the outset. For example, both an owner and a manager of a building are likely to be real parties in interest. However, the principal need not attend if the representative (i.e., the manager of the building) has the authority of the principal (i.e., the owner of the building) to enter into an agreement binding on the principal. It is the mediator's responsibility to verify orally or in writing, with the principal, that the representative, in fact, has the authority to enter into an agreement resolving the dispute. Length of Sessions. Most mediations last one session of approximately 1-3 hours; family law mediations and some complex business disputes generally require a minimum of 3 sessions. k. Confidentiality Agreement. The NJC Confidentiality Agreement must be signed prior to the commencement of the mediation. I. Consent to the Mediation Process. The parties should affirmatively consent to participation in the mediation process, including consent to reach an agreement, preferably a written one, resolving the dispute. 2. General Mediation Rules. These rules generally govern all mediations, but the mediator is not required to explain them to the disputants at the outset. a. Speaking to Witnesses. It is not proper for the mediator to talk to witnesses outside the presence of the disputants, unless all of the disputants consent. b. Inquiry of Experts or Others. The mediator is permitted to inquire of other mediators and experts concerning subject matters raised in the mediation. c. Visiting Outside Locations. With the consent of the disputants, mediators may visit locations relevant to the dispute. 9 is not indicated in every case, but it is advisable if family violence is suspected. If the mediator caucuses with one disputant, the mediator shall also caucus with all other disputants. d. Written Agreement. Any agreement reached as a result of the mediation should be memorialized in writing and signed by the parties, unless the mediator and the parties decide this would be counter- productive. In reducing the agreement to writing, the mediator may suggest clarifications and appropriate language to the parties. In family law disputes, any agreement reached by the parties is subject to court approval. e. Initial Presentation by Parties. Each side shall be allowed to make an initial presentation of his/her side of the story without interruptions by the other side. f. Full Disclosure. The parties shall be encouraged to make full disclosure of all relevant information to the mediator. However, the mediation session is not a preliminary legal proceeding where evidence is developed for future use. Attorneys for Parties. Disputants may have counsel present at the mediation; however, it is generally not necessary for attorneys to be present. If attorneys are present, their role is only to advise their clients and not to interrogate the parties or the mediator. If only one party's attorney appears, the other party should be given the opportunity to have an attorney present and a continuation of the mediation may be appropriate. Any counsel present at a mediation shall be obtained at the party's own expense. h. Witnesses, Family Members and Other Non -Parties. The role of a witness, family member or other non-party, is only to assist the parties in resolving the dispute. The mediator should not look to these persons to assist him/her in ascertaining the facts. Such persons may be heard only with the permission of the parties and the mediator. g. 8 3. Communication. Whenever an NJC mediator communicates in writing with one party, the mediator shall at the same time send a copy of the communication to each other party. When a mediator receives any written communication or material concerning the case from one party which has not already been sent to each other party, the mediator shall do so. 4. Personal Reaction of Mediator The mediator should be aware of personal adverse reactions to a disputant or to the type of dispute. In the event of offensive or disruptive behavior by a disputant, a mediator need not resign from the mediation in response to a personal adverse reaction, but should warn the disputants that if offensive or disruptive behavior happens again, the mediation will have to be suspended. C. Mediation Procedures. 1. Explanation of the Mediation Process. The mediator has a duty to explain at the beginning of the mediation the procedures used in the mediation and to set the ground rules for the conduct of the mediation. The following topics should be covered in the explanation, and the mediator should follow the procedures described below: a. Purpose of Mediation. The purpose of mediation is to explore any and all options for a resolution that meets the mutual needs of the participants and responds to their own sense of fairness. b. Mediation vs. Arbitration/Litigation. In mediation, there is no determination of facts, guilt, liability or fault. The mediator is not a judge; any decision must be made by the parties themselves. c. Caucus with One Disputant. An individual interview with one disputant is commonly referred to as caucus. Whether or not to hold a caucus is a decision to be made by the mediator but only after careful consideration of any objection by the disputants. A caucus 7 3. Disclosure of Past Crimes Including Child Abuse. If a disputant or witness alleges or reveals past crimes, except for incidents of child abuse, the statements made in a mediation shall remain confidential and shall not be revealed by the mediator to anyone except appropriate NJC staff members. In the case of statements of information concerning past child abuse, the following applies: if a child alleges that he/she has been the victim of child abuse, the mediator shall notify the NJC Director at the earliest practical opportunity. If a parent or other third person makes an accusation of past child abuse, the mediator shall notify the NJC Director at the earliest practical opportunity unless the mediator determines that the accusation was only a reflection of anger or retaliation or the alleged incident of child abuse was so remote in time that it is extremely unlikely to reoccur in the future. If the mediator has any doubt as to whether or not to notify the NJC Director of an alleged incident of child abuse, the mediator shall always notify the NJC Director. When the NJC Director is notified of an instance of child abuse, he/she shall notify the appropriate authorities. 4. Threat of Future Violent Harm. If during a mediation, a disputant or witness threatens another, and the mediator believes there is a likelihood of future violent harm, the mediator shall at the earliest practical opportunity inform the NIC Director who shall forthwith notify the potential victim and the appropriate authorities. B. Neutrality 1. Neutrality and the Appearance of Neutrality. Mediators should, at all times, be neutral and strive to give the appearance of neutrality. Please refer to Section IV for further information. 2. Opportunity to Equally Express Views. The mediator shall endeavor to allocate the mediation session as equally as possible to the various sides of the dispute. 6 2. The mediator's ability to speak in a given language or dialect should be taken into consideration so as to be the most compatible with that of the disputants. 3. A certified mediator may be assigned to any case unless: a. the mediator lacks the necessary expertise in the subject matter of the dispute; b. the mediator is unable to be impartial toward the subject matter of the dispute or the disputants; c. there exists a conflict of interest between the mediator and the dispute or the disputants (please refer to Section IV below); or d. the mediator is uncomfortable mediating the dispute or otherwise believes it would be inappropriate for him/her to do so. 4. NJC Director shall consider co -mediation in appropriate cases. It is the preferred practice of the NJC to assign co -mediators in every family law and multi-party dispute. In addition, every effort shall be made to assign both a male and a female mediator to each family law mediation. III. ETHICAL ISSUES AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES. A. Confidentiality. 1. Confidentiality Agreement. Before proceeding with a mediation, the parties shall execute the NJC Confidentiality Agreement, illustrated on page 13 of this manual. The NJC shall resist through legal process any effort to subpoena NJC records or mediators or otherwise to force disclosure of confidential material or statements. Mediators should contact the NJC Director immediately upon learning of any effort to subpoena a mediator or NJC records. 2. Non -Disclosure. Mediators have an ethical obligation not to reveal directly or indirectly to anyone, other than appropriate NJC staff members, the names of the parties or the nature of the dispute which they mediate. 5 D. Service Requirement. An NJC mediator should be willing to give 50 hours per year of service to the NJC program. E. Additional Training for Family Law Mediations. In order for a mediator to mediate family disputes, the mediator must have successfully completed special training of at least 6 additional hours, which shall include a mock mediation of a family dispute and information and training on family violence situations. In addition, the mediator shall first conduct at least one co -mediation of a family dispute with an experienced family law mediator. F. In -Service Trainings. 1. A mediator shall attend a minimum of three NJC in-service training programs per year, which shall include supervised sessions, material updates, new developments and mediation techniques. 2. It is the responsibility of the mediator to keep abreast of current techniques, issues and concerns in the field of mediation. II. MC ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES IN SELECTION OF MEDIATORS. A. Balance in Selecting Staff of Mediators. There shall be an attempt to achieve a balance in the staffing of mediators, including by race, sex, language abilities and occupational background. B. Selection, Assignment, Supervision and Termination of Mediators. The NJC Director shall be responsible for the selection, assignment, supervision and termination of mediators. Disputes between the NJC staff and mediators should be mediated by a subcommittee of the NJC Project Committee, to be appointed as the need arises. C. Guidelines for Assignment of Mediators to Specific Cases. 1. The primary guideline in the assignment of a mediator to a specific case is that the mediator be appropriate to both the dispute and the disputant. 4 I. STANDARDS AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEDIATORS. A. General Qualifications for Certification. In order to be certified as an NJC mediator, a candidate shall successfully complete an initial training program administered by the NIC, be approved by the NJC Director as a proficient mediator of disputes and agree in writing to abide by the terms of this manual. In order to maintain certification, mediators shall also attend and complete regular in-service training programs administered by the NJC. There are no age, race, sex, or educational standards or requirements for mediators. B. Minimum Initial Training Program for Certification. 1. The minimum initial training program shall consist of 35 hours of training, which shall include two or more mock mediation sessions. 2. Training shall include substantive law courses on landlord and tenant law, negligence law, breach of contract law, criminal law and in any other areas of the law where common problems arise in NJC mediations. Training shall also include recognizing and dealing with issues of bias. 3. A candidate shall observe a minimum of two actual mediations. 4. A candidate shall act as an assistant mediator at one or two actual mediations. 5. A candidate shall conduct a mediation as sole mediator under supervision. 6. Evaluation of the competency of a candidate as assistant or sole mediator shall not depend upon whether or not the disputants reach an agreement in the certification mediation. C. Skills Required for Certification. 1. Ability to communicate and listen well. 2. Ability to manage emotional conflicts. 3. Ability to write agreements clearly. 4. Ability to understand and comply with NJC standards for mediators and mediation. 3 e. Initial Presentation by Parties 8 f. Full Disclosure 8 g. Attorneys for Parties 8 h. Witnesses, Family Members and Other Non -Parties 8 i. Real Parties in Interest 9 j. Length of Sessions 9 k. Confidentiality Agreement 9 I. Consent to the Mediation Process 9 2. General Mediation Rules 9 a. Speaking to Witnesses 9 b. Inquiry of Experts or Others 9 c. Visiting Outside Locations 9 d. Outside Observers 10 e. Legal Advice 10 f. Unjust Agreements 10 g. Personal Expertise 11 h. Child Custody 11 i. Constitutional Rights 11 IV. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 11 V. NIC PROPRIETARY INFORMATION CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT 12 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STANDARDS AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEDIATORS A. General Qualifications for Certification 3 B. Minimum Initial Training Program for Certification 3 C. Skills Required for Certification 3 D. Service Requirement 4 E. Additional Training for Family Law Mediations 4 F. In -Service Trainings 4 II. NJC ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES IN SELECTION OF MEDIATORS A. Balance in Selecting Staff of Mediators 4 B. Selection, Assignment, Supervision and Termination of Mediators 4 C. Guidelines for Assignment of Mediators to Specific Cases 4 III. ETHICAL ISSUES AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES A. Confidentiality 1. Confidentiality Agreement 5 2. Non -Disclosure 5 3. Disclosure of Past Crimes Including Child Abuse 6 4. Threat of Future Violent Harm 6 B. Neutrality 1. Neutrality and the Appearance of Neutrality 6 2. Opportunity to Equally Express Views 6 3. Communication 7 4. Personal Reaction of Mediator 7 C. Mediation Procedures 1. Explanation of the Mediation Process 7 a. Purpose of Mediation 7 b. Mediation vs. Arbitration/Litigation 7 c. Caucus with One Disputant 7 d. Written Agreement 8 HOW CAN WE HELP YOU? If you hay. a disputa, call one of the DRS Community Mediation Pro- grams' offices. If we can assist you, we will contact the other party and once both sides are willing, schedule a mediation at a mutually convenient time and location. DRS STAFF Lauren Burton, Director Loretta Francesco, Program Director Community Nsdiation Programs Judy Goldman, Program Director School Mediation Programs Karan Frssman, Program Director Attorney/Client Relations Pro- gram Richard Asksy, Program Coordinator Dorothy Lank, Program Coordinator Joyce Smith, Program Coordinator Main Office 2830 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 (213) 450-5252 Most Hollywood Office 543 No. Fairfax Los Angelos, CA 90035 (213) 854-0122 Compton Office 4519 East Compton Blvd. Compton, CA 90221 (213) 809-7401/7405 COMMENTS FROM PAST MEDIATION PARTICIPANTS "Mediation saved us{a lot of time and money." "A good way to solve problems." "Th. mediator took time and was vary good. I am most appreciative and would use mediation again - •m- phaticallyl" "We can now live in peace. Wish ws had mediated sooner." "Excellent service." AND FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT "Mediation is a cost-effective tool for resolving many interpersonal conflicts. When parties get involved in the mediation process they devel- op a stake in seeing the problem solved. We view Community Mediation Programs of DRS (formerly the Neigh- borhood Justice Center) as an impor- tant public service." Robert M. Myers Santa Monica City Attorney "In the year and a half that ws hays worked with your program, w• hays been impressed with the quality, the professionalism, and the ability of your organization to provide a quick, •ffectiv• method of dispute resolution." Capt. Mark M. Squires Commander, West Hollywood Sheriff's Station DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES COMMUNITY Min AT ION PROGRAMS A Non-Profi Corporation of the Los Angeles County Bar Association HISTORY The Los Angeles County Bar Associa- tion was one of the earliest pio- neers in the field of alternative dispute resolution, when in 1978, 1t founded the Neighborhood Justice Center, one of the oldest community mediation programs in the nation. In furtherance of its goal to im- prove the administration of justice, in 1987, the Los Angeles County Bar Association consolidated all of the Association's dispute resolution programs and activities under a new non-profit organization, Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. (DRS). Programs administered by DRS include the following: 1) Community Media- tion Programs (the former Neighbor- hood Justice Center; 2) School Medi- ation Programs; 3) Court Programs; 4) Attorney/Client Relations Pro- grams; and 5) Training Programs. Simply stated, mediation is a dis- pute resolution process in which a neutral facilitator assists people in conflict to put their dispute into ■anageabls terms and helps them to arrive at a resolution through the means of clarification, communi- cation, acknowledgement, suggestion and negotiation. Mediation is an opportunity for individuals to com- municate directly with one another, to hear each other's positions and to explore any and all options for a resolution that meets their mutual needs. Often, disputes that fester over a long period of time escalate and can result in acts of frustration. Mediation provides a quick, effec- tive method of resolving conflict which allows people to fashion peaceably their own solutions, thereby improving the quality of 1ife in the community by defusing ongoing conflicts and fostering non- violent alternatives. MEDIATION ZS .Confidential - A11 parties in a mediation sign a Confidentiality Agreement ensuring that information divulged in a mediation session remains private. .Quick - Most mediations ars sche- duled within two weeks of the initial request for service, and most disputes can be resolved in one session. .Effective - More than 90% of all mediations result in a long-term resolution of the disputa; BBS of all agreements achieved ars per- formed with no problem; and 98% of all persons served ars very satis- fied with the services. .Inexpensive - A small case process- ing fes (0-910) is the only charge in most cases. There is a sliding scala fes for marital dissolution/ family law cases. Business cases ars $75 per hour (940 per hour for non-profit organizations). All foes can be waived for those unable to pay. TYPES OF DISPUTES WE HANDER LANDLORD/TENANT Security deposits, nonpayment of rent, repairs, evictions, apartment entry, lockout, etc. NEIGHBORHOOD Noise, pets, nuisances, use of common property lines, parking, etc. CONSUMER/MERCHANT Refunds, warranties, repairs, depos- its, services, etc. EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE Contracts, wages, dismissals, etc. (where no union is involved). SMALL CLAIMS Debts, accidents, property, etc. FAMILY LAN Divorce settlements, custody, visi- tation schedules, spousal and child support, etc. BUSINESS Business formations and dissolu- tions, business disputes, real •s- tats transactions, etc. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 27, 1988 City Council Meeting of October 11, 1988 APPROVAL OF PROCEDURE ON RECLASSIFICATIONS AND RECLASSIFICATIONS OF CERTAIN POSITIONS Recommendation: That the City Council confirm the procedure for reclassifications described below and authorize the reclassifications of the fol- lowing positions: 1. Present Class: Parking Enforcement Officer Reclassification: Parking Meter Technician Location: General Services Department Incumbent: Robert Thomas 2. Present Class: Clerk Typist Reclassification: Account Clerk Location: Finance Department Incumbents: Kathy Chiles, Sherria Lawrence 3. Present Class: Clerk Typist (Senior) Reclassification: Administrative Aide Location: Planning Incumbent: Yu-Ying Ting Background: Several proposed position reclassifications in the General Ser- vices, Finance, and Planning Department were included in this year's annual budget and/or discussed with the employee associa- tions during meet and confer discussions. At the same time, questions have been raised by citizen activist Wilma Burt and others regarding how City employees can move to higher positions without competitive exams. The intent of this recommendation is to set an orderly, written procedure for reclassifications and process those reclassifications proposed. Analysis: Civil Service and merit systems provide for promotional, competi- tive exams when a position is vacant, and other employees wish to be promoted from lower paid positions to the vacant one. This procedure would be considered as an appointment to a vacant posi- tion and require the Civil Service Board to certify the eligibility list. Reclassifications of a position, which may result in higher pay, do not occur as a result of a vacancy. Rather, reclasses occur when the duties of a position have been found by independent study to be predominantly not within the current classification's list of duties. - 1 - 1 0 Since pay plans are based on a concept of fairness and equity, employees performing duties other than those listed for their classes cause a basic inequity in the City's pay system. To correct this inequity, Civil Service and merit systems provide for reclasses and accompanying pay level changes where appropriate. An obvious concern is to avoid misuse of reclassifications to subvert competitive exam processes. In order to establish a written procedure to prevent misuse, we have reviewed the Los Angeles County's Civil Service procedures for reclassifications. Based on their procedures and our understanding, of how rules can be best applied within our City, the following criteria for reclassifications are proposed: (1) Reclassification studies shall be initiated by the Personnel Department upon recommendation of the Department Head in- dicating that the duties required of a current position have become predominantly other than those described in the clas- sification specification sheet. (2) The Personnel Department shall recommend a reclassification upon conducting a study of the subject position's duties and establishing findings that meet all of the following criteria: (a) that a predominant amount of duties required of the position are other than as described for the current classification; (b) that the incumbent in the position has performed these "out of classification" duties for at least six months; (c) that the incumbent(s) in the position(s) is or are the only person(s) performing those specific duties; and (d) that the incumbent has adequately demonstrated that he/ she meets the requirements for the proposed classification. (3) Reclassifications, along with new class specification sheets and/or amendments to the salary resolution or budget, if appropriate, shall be approved by the City Council. Upon approval, the reclassification will take effect the first day of the payroll period in which the Council action was approved. (4) Reclassification shall not be used for the purpose of avoid- ing procedures regarding promotions and demotions. Implementation of the above -noted reclassifications procedure is similar to past practice, except reclassifications have been ap- proved by the Civil Service Board. Since changes to the clas- sification plan and salary resolution must be approved by the City Council per N.S. 211 (1960 initiative Civil Service Or- dinance), it seems simpler to provide for all reclassifications to go to the City Council. As this process results in a reclas- sification and not an appointment, there is no need to have the Civil Service Board to certify this action. c The recommended procedure is consistent with L. A. County Civil Service procedures as well as N.S. 211. The latter provides for competitive exams "...as far as practicable...". Clearly, a reclassification is separate from a promotional opportunity oc- curring because of a vacant position. These facts significantly affect the "practicality" of competitive exam processes. evin B. Nor craft City Manager KBN/ld cc: Wilma Burt 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT Reclassification Finding A classification study of the position(s) listed below has been com- pleted with the following indicated finding(s): Classification Present Class Finding Location Incumbent Parking Enf. Off. Parking Meter Tech. General Services R. Thomas Clerk Typist Account Clerk Finance K. Chiles Clerk Typist Account Clerk Finance S. Lawrence Clerk Typist Administrative Aide Planning Y. Ting It has been determined that the incumbent meets the eligibility re- quirements for the reclassified position; is the only person perform- ing the duties in that position at the indicated location; and has performed the duties in this position for at least six months. f,"44-1-22/, Ro ert A. Blackwoo Personnel Director .a. CHIEF AD`1INISTRATIVE OFFICER JUL 30 et COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — 7'3 m•t.V OF •CMtAoSTRA ,ON LOS •N6CLL5 C•L $OU ../. •C:'t •7•.ttpt JAMES C IIANKLA Ec A:Y.%.S'o•' .E July 22, 1986 To: Department and District Heads From: James C. Hankla Chief Administrative Officer Subject: HUMAN RESOURCES REPORT NO. 57: RECLASS EXAMINATION POLICY/PROCEDURE CHANGE vEv3rac 2: •—€ •:.a: JE •Eac SC—a•A•... 2-• :—ac. _ +ti•:.:. In keeping with our desire to eliminate unnecessary processes and to streamline human resource activity, a new policy is being implemented relating to Reclass Examinations. Formerly, a classification study which resulted in an would require the conduct of a reclass examination in qualify an incumbent for appointment to the position. process was followed even when it was clear that only incumbent was eligible for the position. The attached policy/procedure change will permit the Classification Division's reporting out document to be certified by Employee Selection so the incumbent may be appointed. During the classification study, appropriate steps will be taken to insure that no other persons would be entitled to compete for the position and that the incumbent meets the requirements of the reclassified position. Questions concerning the new policy may be directed to Richard Zern, Classification Division, at 974-2439 or Ernie Oestreich, Employee Selection at 974-2701. JCH : DRD LO:ug upgrade order to This the Attachment NO: 57 DATE: July. 1, 1986 POLICY/PROCEDURE CHANGE: RECLASS EXAMINATIONS This report supersedes all previous issues relating to Reclass Examinations. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy/procedure change is to eliminate the unwieldly and unnecessary aspects of the current process for Reclass Examinations. Prior to this change, staff hours would be wasted by going through the required activity to bulletin and conduct an examination when it was clear that no competition existed. Effective the date of this policy, the classification study will take appropriate steps to ascertain whether there is only one potential eligible for each reclassified position. The letter repotting the results of a classification study will shoe the incumbent's name and a statement to permit the CAO Office of Human Resources Certification Unit to certify the letter as the eligible list for the position. POLICY It shall be the policy of the County of Los Angeles, effective the date of this report, to fill positions created as the result of a reclassification by using one of three methods: 1. The reporting out letter may be certified as the eligible list when the classification study findings indicate that there is only one eligible for each position. 2. The Department may request that a Reclass Examination be bulletined with a defined specialty for the position. 3. Any other selection process in keeping with County rules and regulations may be used. PROCEDURES 1. Following approval of the reclassification study findings by the Board of Supervisors, and in accordance with Civil Service Rules 7.04 and 7.06, the Certification Unit of the Employee Selection Division will, on request from the line department, initiate one of the three policy options. Policy/Procedure Change: Reclass Examinations July 1, 1986 Page 2 2. For Option 1, when the classification study findings meet the criteria below, the Human Resources Certification Unit may, on .request of the affected department, certify the reporting out letter initiated by the Human Resources Classification Division as constituting the certified Reclass Examination list. a. The study findings identify one and only one individual per reclassified position as eligible to be appointed in accordance with Human Resources policy. The reporting out letter will show such incumbent's name. b. The ordinance change has been approved by the Board of Supervisors and is in effect. c. The incumbent meets the minimum requirements for the higher level position as determined by the classification analyst. d. The reporting out letter contains the following statement: "This letter may be used as the eligible list for the following position(s): ." 3. In selecting Option 1, information from the reporting out letter will be posted on the official county recruitment bulletin board in compliance with Civil Service Rule 7.03 a. 4. At the end of the required posting time, and after the ordinance change has been approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Department may process an Incoming Report for the person(s) named in the reporting out letter. A copy of the letter should be attached. 5. When selecting Option 2, the current procedures which exist for conducting Reclass Examinations will be followed. The Certification Unit will prepare the Promotional Opportunities bulletin, Examinations As The Result of A Reclassification" after consultation with the concerned department. The special card form, "Application for Promotional Examination for Reclassified Position," will be used. Policy/Procedure Change: Reclass Examinations July 1, 1986 Page 3 6. Option 3 may be any other selection process permissible under the Civil Service Rules and other County Code Regulations. 7. For additional information or questions regarding Reclass Examinations, contact the CAO-OHR Employee Selection Division, or the CAO-OHR Classification Division. References: a. Los Angeles 5.88 Civi Rule 7 Rule 7 Rule 8 County Code Title 5 Personnel Chapter 1 Service Rules .04 Competitive Examinations .06 Types of Examinations .01 Non -Competitive Examinations b. Los Angeles County Personnel Management Handbook Section 100 Recruitment and Placement Section 150.01 d. Reclass Examinations Section 200 Classification Section 220 Study Procedures Section 285 The Evaluation c. CAO/Human Resources Employee Selection Division Policy & Procedure Manual Section 900 Reclass Examinations - Certification's Responsibilities 10/23/81 Classification Staff Memo on Reclass Reporting Out Letters Classification Employee Selection Responsible Division Responsible Division 974-2439 974-2701 I • • I • - ' ' •-IG /r I i. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES 222 NORTH GRAND AVENUE. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 974.2401 JAMES C. HANKLA CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Reporting out letter as Reclass Exam Personnel Officer MEMBERS OF THE BOARD PETER F SCHABARUM CHAIRMAN KENNETH HAHN EDMUND 0 EDELMAN DEANE DANA MICHAEL 0 ANTONOVICH We have conducted a classification study of the position(s) listed below; our finding(s) is(are) as follows: Classification Location and Present Class Finding Assignment . Incumbent We have determined that the incumbent is the only person eligible for the reclassified position. Therefore, this letter may be used as the eligible list for the position indicated. (add withhold restriction if applicable) This finding will be effective upon approval of the Board of Supervisors; appointment to the position may not be made until the ordinance change is operative. BC:RBZ CV:sk Attachments 138L -CHANGES Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council October 3, 1988 City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FOR CONSIDERATION AS THE "MODEL COMMUNITY" FOR A DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SPONSORED RECYCLING PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to submit the City of Hermosa Beach for consideration as the "model com- munity" for a Department of Conservation sponsored recycling program. BACKGROUND Staff has received a letter from the Department of Conservation inviting the City of Hermosa Beach to Submit an application for consideration as the "model community" for its recycling im- plementation program. One California community will be selected. ANALYSIS Due to a serious decline in landfill capacity, increased citizen concern over environmental degradation and depletion of our natural resources, there has been a resurgence of interest in RECYCLING as a partial solution to the solid waste management dilemma. Californian's Against Waste, a statewide, nonprofit private agen- cy is conducting a "model community" recycling program under the sponsorship of the California Department of Conservation. One California community that presently has little or no recycling activities will be selected. The CAW will work in the selected community for a twelve month period. At the completion of the program, CAW will present the local government with a comprehensive model community recycling plan which will include: a) A "how-to" process for developing a state-of-the-art, cost- effective recycling program. b) An analysis and evaluation of specific recycling opportuni- ties such as: mandatory vs. voluntary curbside; co -mingled vs. source separated materials; composting; and "buy- back"recycling. c) A budget plan. 1 11 d) A promotion strategy. According to the invitation to apply, "for this program to suc- ceed, CAW will need a community that is committed, both philosophically and financially, to effectively changing their waste management policies to an environmentally sound policy in- volving recycling. It is not possible to specify an exact financial committment at this point in time. Clearly there will be be some cost depending on the type of recycling program chosen (mandatory or voluntary curbside, co -mingled vs. source separated materials, "buy back' recycling). The additional cost would either be added to refuse bills or be borne by the City. Proposed communities will be evaluated on the following criteria: 1) Motivation to participate in this project 2) Status of current recycling in the community, including non- profit, private and/or municipal. 3) Resources that will be contributed to this effort. 4) Number of residences in the community. 5) Population of community The selection will also be based on the interest and committment of elected officials, community groups, schools, etc. in environ- mental issues. Not having yet determined the level of our residents interest in recycling, the level of interest by staff and elected officials will be the key issue for an effective application. Staff would therefore need some feedback in terms of Council interest in recycling. The application must be received by October 14, 1988. Concur: Concur: Respectfully submitted, 4 Ja ice Silver A'uinistrative Aide ////' is j '-'�'-i`—�j,.�► evin B. Northcraft Wi liam Grove, Director City Manager 2 Dept. of Bldg. & Safety • AcGcu ATERIAL 7 1. _ • .r, ., r17 .•.,��•:•J{YY'. ily � ��...i..�i1�b++i�b•T+r.-.:I.#w�:�Af4�A+_!lPJlmi-MX!��ae�inf.13:Z,�wlfi`J,!'�..� S'• Y�QOZ Li. .au1-7 STATE Of CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gov-erner DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION Of RECYCLING 1050 - 20th St. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 August 11, 1988 1,988 PUBLIC LVoRf($(s1a$s s DEPT, (916) 323-3743 TDD (916) 324-2555 Dear Local Government Official: I am proud to introduce a new project sponsored by our Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling, and performed by Californians Against Waste (CAW), a statewide, nonprofit, private agency dedicated to reducing waste and effecting environmentally sound solid waste management. For the next 12 months, CAW will work with one California community that presently has little or no recycling activi- ties, to research, coordinate and implement a recycling plan- ning program in that community. At the completion of the program, CAW will present the local government with a comprehensive model community recycling plan. This plan will include: a) A "how-to" process for developing a state-of-the-art, cost-effective recycling program. b) An analysis and evaluation of specific recycling opportunities such as: mandatory vs. voluntary curbside; co -mingled vs. source separated materials; composting; and "buy-back" recycling. c) A budget plan. d) A promotion strategy. Page 2 August 11, 1988 We would invite you to become involved by submitting your community for consideration to be selected. Please examine the enclosed material to see if your community would benefit by the CAW program. For this program to succeed, CAW will need a community that is committed, both philosophically and financially, to effectively changing their waste management policies to an environmentally sound policy involving recycling. I,f yours is such a community, please toss your hat into the ring! If you have any questions regarding this program, or need additional information, please call any of the following: Pat Miller, CAW Project Manager Mark Murray, CAW Local Government Liaison Janie Cordray, Department of Conservation We are locking forward to hearing from you. Respectfully, Enclosure LGV:JC:mhf (408) 730-8105 (916) 443-5422 (916) 322-4636 L. G. Vann, Jr. Chief Division of Recycling , Californians Aganst Waste THE BIG PICTURE! Virtually every community in California is facing some kind of solid waste disposal dilemma. Half of the state's landfills will be filled or closed due to environmental regulation by the year 2000. The siting of new landfills is meeting with increased citizen concern and resistance over issues such as increased traffic, groundwater pollution, and lack of suitable space. The solid waste collection and disposal activities of each city and county represent a complex system entertwined by a web of rules: state regulations, city and county ordinances, collection and disposal contracts or franchises, solid waste facility permits, city and county solid waste and general plans, zoning ordinances, capital and operating budgets, and residential and commercial rate structures. There are already communities that are looking to recycling as an alternative to waste. Mandatory recycling is being pursued on the east coast where waste generations and landfill shortages are even more critical. But even in California, several communities are already considering it. Contra Costa County recently recommended mandatory curbside recycliing for all cities in the county within 2 years. Marin County recently opened a $9.5 million recycling facility, with a goal to reduce waste by 50%. The San Diego County Board of Supervisors adopted a 25% recycling goal and has already approved the concept of mandatory recycling. Of course, landfills aren't the only problem. We are still facing depletion of natural resources, environmental degradation, and possibly most importantly, wasteful behavior. As an example, the United States makes up about 6% of the world's population, but uses approximately 41% of the world's resources. As responsible citizens, we must initiate a change in behavior in order to ensure a better future. 909 12th Street, #201, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-5422 racyclad paper A \ I WHAT YOU CAN DO: Your city or county may already be in the process of considering some form of recycling, but many obstacles confront you. What will it cost? Where will the operation be located? Is it really worth all the extra work? Would a new system be too complicated for residents? Our present disposal system is already incredibly complex. The City of San Francisco is now shipping their trash to Altamont Pass, 50 miles out of town because they have no landfill. Long Island ships their trash to Ohio. Florida has such a high water table and so few landfills much of their trash is exported out of state. Philadelphia hopes to send theirs to the Caribbean Islands, despite the "Garbage Barge" Odyssey. And of course we've all traced the voyages of the garbage ship "Mobro" whose mission was to seek out and discover strange new dumping places. •..fit {'(�,��f�5"4f.k fit.+• L�+S�k. G_ti— �� �.�.- j•_ v••••••••• `rT".r y}.- -�.-.r �r!� �- `• 4.t.-- •. • Sc._.. _ }" .fir'' _��'' : - _=;,,s�•ez�► -^�y.�v - �E''�" - rr �.+�� s'-= And all of these "solutions" carry a tremendous cost, both financially and environmentally. They cost us money for disposal bills, thousands of acres of land devoted virtually forever to landfills, and the loss of valuable natural resources. This year there were no fewer. than 40 new bills introduced in the legislature that dealt with recycling. The passage of AB 2020, the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, marked the beginning of change in California. Environmentalists, and particularly CAW, have been fighting for a bottle bill in this state for over 20 years. The introduction of these bills traditionally met with opposition from members of industry. AB 2020 is the bill that not only environmentalists supported, but industry as well. The passing of this bill, a law that is unique to California, serves as an acknowledgement that recycling must be a part of California's plans to conserve our natural resources. Nine other states have passed traditional bottle bills. Your community has an opportunity to show its commitment to conserving our natural resources and make a positive contribution to the environment by becoming a model in California to plan a comprehensive program of waste reduction and recycling. By incorporating recycling as part of an overall waste reduction plan, it will be an integral part of the process, rather than an afterthought, or an appendage. WE CAN HELP YOU: The State of California Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling is offering a twelve-month program to one community in California as a model to research, coordinate, and implement the planning process for a comprehensive, state-of-the-art recycling program. This invitation to apply for this program is being extended to every city and county in California. This work will be carried out by Californians Against Waste, the statewide, nonprofit organization who fought long and hard for the passage of AB 2020. CAW has recruited Pat Miller to be their project manager for this program. Ms. Miller's extraordinary background will bring hands-on experience in managing material recovery programs, marketing recovered materials, routing of collection vehicles, and cost accounting for recycling operations. She has been a recycling advocate for over 16 years, and is the former manager of the City of Sunnyvale's innovative recycling program. In 1985 her program was selected as the most outstanding curbside collection program in the United States by the National Recycling Coalition. She is responsible for establishing one of the first curbside recycling programs for plastic beverage containers in the United States. She has sold recovered materials to secondary materials buyers in both domestic and export markets and has conducted monthly multi -material market surveys throughout California. CAW WILL HELP YOUR COMMUNITY: 1. Survey public opinion and attitude towards various recycling activities and potential for participation. 2. Survey and identify markets for recyclable materials, taking into account volumes available, transportation costs, and long term demand. 3. Prepare a "menu" of waste reduction and recycling opportunities for the community. The program will outline costs and benefits, and their potential for successful implementation. 4. Coordinate a meaningful community involvement process to build broad consensus for recycling choices. Input would be sought from citizens, community groups, and businesses in order to achieve support by and for the community. 5. Develop written materials explaining the current situation facing the community and the potentials offered by various recycling and waste reduction efforts. 6. Conduct community workshops to discuss the menu of recycling opportunities with business groups, neighborhood associations, public interest groups, community service organizations, and waste industry and recycling representatives. 7. Issue press releases and hold events to promote presenta- tions, workshops, and other activities to raise community awareness. 8. At the culmination of this project the community will have a model plan, including budget, and promotion strategy'for a creative recycling program that best utilizes the resources and potential of the community. WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU: If you are interested in having this model program performed in your community, begin now by sending in your invitation response materials. We will select a community that has little or no organized recycling now, but has the genuine desire to make a positive committent to recycling principles. Responses will be evaluated by a combination of the following criteria: 1. Motivation to participate in this project. 2. Status of current recycling in the community, including non-profit, private, and/or municipal. 3. Resources that will be contributed to this effort. 4. Number of residences in the community. 5. Population of community. Any information that could be helpful in making our decision should be included. The following issues are of particular interest to us: 1. Municipal involvement: staff participation, public outreach, economic development/redevelopment initiative, elected officials' interest and commitment, council resolutions, waste disposal situation, motivation. 2. Secondary industry support: convenience zone operators (recycling centers), paper companies, scrap metal dealers, plastics dealers, and recyclers' letters of support. 3. Local business support: retailers who generate wastes, commercial/industrial sector, and grocer's letters of interest. 4. Active citizens: environmental groups, schools, youth organizations, interested parties. All materials must be received by Friday, October 14, 1988. The review of the applications will be conducted by CAW, and may include an interview with CAW and DOC before the final selection. The selected community will be announced by FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1988. For your convenience, a suggested format is included. This sample is not a requirement, but is merely intended as a suggestion. We expect you may have some questions about your responses. Please feel free to call Pat Miller at (408) 730-8105, if you have any questions. Good luck! We are looking forward to your response. room ®■ CALIFORNIANS AGAINST WASTE 909 12th Street, Suite 201 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 443-5422 RESPONSE FORM Name of Agency Address Authorized Person Title Telephone Contact Person Title Telephone (Suggested Format) I. Motivation to participate II. Status of current recycling III. Additional resources and support IV. Number or households (single family/multi-family) V. Population IV. Additional information you may wish to include (use additional sheets)