The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/09/88"We have forty million reasons for failure, but not a single excuse." -Rudyard Kipling AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, November 9, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Jim Rosenberger MAYOR PRO TEM June Williams COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: Marine Corps Recognition Week, November 6-12, 1988 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) - 1 - (a)' Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on October 25, 1988. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the October Invest- ment Report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated (e) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) c Recommendation to authorize advertising of Request for Proposals for Consultant Design Services related to the Street Repair Projects CIP 85-160 and 87-171. Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated Oc- tober 17, 1988. Recommendation to authorize staff to solicit for pro- posals for engineering services for preparation of a Park Irrigation System Assessment and Rehabilitation Program, CIP 87-508. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated October 17, 1988. Recommendation to accept work as complete for City Hall electrical upgrade, CIP 86-602. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 31, 1988. Recommendation to deny request for a bicycle lane on Valley Drive, from Valley School to Gould Avenue. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 24, 1988. Recommendation to approve contract with Audio Graphics Systems, Inc. for installation of screen and projectors in the Civic Theatre. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Alana Mastrian dated November 1, 1988. Recommendation to approve final project accounting and accept inspection as complete for Beach Drive sanitary sewer/storm drain/street improvements, CIP 87-302. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 26, 1988. Recommendation to approve annual holiday waiver of com- mercial parking meter enforcement, and authorize use of City streets for the holiday kick off on December 1. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated November 1, 1988. esolutions to improve sight distances on Valley Drive t 25th Street, 24th Street and 24th Place as follows: 1) A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING THERETO A NO PARKING ZONE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF VALLEY DRIVE AS HEREIN SET FORTH. - 2 - (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) 2) A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING THERETO A NO PARKING RESTRICTION FIFTY FEET WEST OF VALLEY DRIVE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH PLACE, 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET, AS HEREIN SET FORTH. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 24, 1988. Aviation Boulevard traffic safety review with resolu- tions for adoption as follows: 1) A RESOLUTION FOR A TRAFFIC REGULATORY (NO LEFT TURN) SIGN ON AUBREY COURT AT AVIATION BLVD. 2) A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING THERETO A NO STOPPING RESTRIC- TION ON AVIATION BLVD AS HEREIN DESCRIBED. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 31, 1988. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 86-4932 AND RESOLUTION 87-5056; AS AMENDED, REGARDING THE RESIDENTIAL ENCROACH- MENT PERMIT LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENT AND APPROV- ING AN UPDATED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ENDORSEMENT PROCEDURE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated October 31, 1988. Recommendation to deny the following Claims for Damages and refer to City's Claims Administrator: 1) William Webb/Browning Ferris, 241 -33rd St., filed October 12, 1988 - alleged sewer damage. 2) Thomas Nichols, 1931 Graham, Redondo Beach, filed October 24, 1988 - alleged wrongful death. Recommendation to appropriate $19,200 from Prospective Expenditures to Planning Department Contract Services for recruitment of a contract planner to prepare General Plan update and complete study of Multi -Use Corridor. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed November 1, 1988. Recommendation to approve three year plan to provide holiday decorations in partnership with the Chamber of Commerce. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. North - craft dated November 1, 1988. Recommendation thorize requestin design for orm damage repai randum fr. lic Works Director Aflony November 1, 1988. l4osals for -614. Memo- Antich dated Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign proclamation declaring November 19, 1988 ',Drug Free Education Night". 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. - 3 - 4./ WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MERGING OF LOTS LOCATED AT 2039 HILLCREST DRIVE, 1922 HILLCREST DRIVE, AND 619 EIGHTH PLACE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 1, 1988. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 6. RECOMMENDATION TO REZONE AREA 2D FROM R-2 TO R -1A OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUN- CIL AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated November 1, 1988. 7. PROPOSED EXTENSION OF REVISED INTERIM ORDINANCE PRO- HIBITING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE MULTI -USE CORRIDOR, WITH ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION. (Re- quires 4/5 vote.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 1, 1988. MUNICIPAL MATTERS NONE 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Discussion of results of November 8, 1988 City ballot issues and follow-up actions. City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft (oral report). 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Arrangement of December, 1988 Council meeting dates. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated November 1, 1988. Restrictions on Adult Businesses and Video Stores. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated Oc- tober 31, 1988. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: 0 (a) Request of Councilmember Simpson to place further restrictions on uses within the open space zone. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. • (b) Request of Councilmember Sheldon for update on status of RCC 911 changeover. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. 11. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT • CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role_ for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers • +i THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government • revenues and/or public conduct. All . ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports ..City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items. to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since. the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on ,the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > read2l Start of Item 21. Message. Dated: 11/09/88 at 0851. Subject: Unofficial Results from County Registrar of Voters Sender: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Contents: 2. BCC: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Part 1. FROM: Kevin NORTHCRAFT / CMGR/00 TO: DISTRIBUTION Part 2. Unofficial Results from Registrar of Voters All Precincts Reporting Measure.' Yes No %Yes W 5,017 3,118 61.67 X 3,803 5,069 42.86 Y 1,154 7,576 13.21 Z , 3,188 5,772 35.58 End of Item 21. Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray Intray > read2l Start of Item 21. Message. Dated: 11/09/88 at 0851. Subject: Unofficial Results from County Registrar of Voters Sender: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Contents: 2. BCC: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Part 1. FROM: Kevin NORTHCRAFT / CMGR/00 TO: DISTRIBUTION Part 2. Unofficial Results from Registrar of Voters All Precincts Reporting Measure Yes No %Yes W 5,017 3,118 61.67 X 3,803 5,069 42.86 Y 1,154 7,576 13.21 Z 3,188 5,772 35.58 End of Item 21. Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > read2l Start of Item 21. Message. Dated: 11/09/88 at 0851. Subject: Unofficial Results from County Registrar of Voters Sender: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Contents: 2. BCC: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Part 1. FROM: Kevin NORTHCRAFT / CMGR/00 TO: DISTRIBUTION Part 2. Unofficial Results from Registrar of Voters All Precincts Reporting Measure Yes No %Yes W 5,017 3,118 61.67 X 3,803 5,069 42.86 Y 1,154 7,576 13.21 Z 3,188 5,772 35.58 End of Item 21. Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > read2l Start of Item 21. Message. Dated: 11/09/88 at 0851. Subject: Unofficial Results from County Registrar of Voters Sender: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Contents: 2. BCC: Laurie DUKE / CMGR/00 Part 1. FROM: Kevin NORTHCRAFT / CMGR/00 TO: DISTRIBUTION Part 2. Unofficial Results from Registrar of Voters All Precincts Reporting Measure Yes No %Yes W 5,017 3,118 61.67 X 3,803 5,069 42.86 Y 1,154 7,576 13.21 Z 3,188 5,772 35.58 End of Item 21. Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > Intray > MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on Tuesday, October 25, at the hour of 7:35 P.M. CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding litigation Gotanda vs. Hermosa Beach et al; Dixon vs. Hermosa Beach, at the hour of 7:03 P.M. Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS Red Ribbon Week, October 23-30, 1988 Buckle Up for Life Challenge, November 1, 1988 PRESENTATION OF TROPHY TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FROM THE HER- MOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE 'DODGERS' TEAM INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Maria Gonzalez, Public Safety Dispatcher Cheryl Goodman, Public Safety Dispatcher Stephen Byrnes, General Services Officer Tracy Yates, Clerk Typist, Public Works PRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER AWARD: 1. Dick Olson, Public Works Department 2. Kim Mitchell, Police Department CITIZEN COMMENTS John Bohler - Fat Face Fenners Falloon - requested that item 1(k) Encroachment Permits be pulled for discussion. Michael McGovern - 715 -7th Street - Requested that any new information on the Moratorium in the MultiUse Corridor be conveyed to the residents. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (o) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (a) Williams, (e) Rosenberger, (k) Williams, (1) Creighton, and (n) Sheldon. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 1 Minutes 10-25-88 la (a) (b) v Recommendation to approve minutes as follows: 1) Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop meeting held on October 5, 1988; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on October 11, 1988. Action: To approve the minutes with the following addi- tion to the minutes of October 11, 1988: Page 5, Item 4(a), Line 3 after "on a program" add: providing bleach and condom kits as an attempt "to stop the spread of HIV infection in Los Angeles County". Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 27842, 27942 through 28079 inclusive; and noting voided warrants 27946, 27948 through 27950 inclusive, and 27976. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the September, 1988 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Reports 2) City Treasurer's Report (e) Recommendation to receive and file report on the results of the community noise study conducted by County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated October 17, 1988. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. (f) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #18790 FOR A 3 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 546 - 11TH STREET. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 17, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5189, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #18790 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 546 ELEVENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (g) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #17663 FOR A 3 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1430 HERMOSA AVENUE. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 17, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5190, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP # 17663 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1430 HERMOSA AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." - 2 - k,Ainutes 10-25-88 (h) Recommendation to receive and file report on City Treasurer investments. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated October 18, 1988. (i) Recommendation to receive and file status of capital improvement projects. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated October 4, 1988. (j) Recommendation to accept work as complete - asphalt street repairs, CIP 87-171. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 18, 1988. Action: To accept as complete CIP 87-171, Asphalt Street Repairs; authorize staff to: Not assess liqui- dated damages, File a notice of completion, Release the 10% retention payment to Vernon Paving Company, Release Vernon Paving Co. from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. (k) Recommendation to repeal Resolutions 87-5055 and 87-5071 and approve encroachment license for businesses using the public right-of-way for outdoor dining, with resolu- tion for adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Anthony Antich dated October 13, 1988. Supplemental memorandum from Public Works dated October 20, 1988. Proposed Action: To receive and file. Motion Williams, second Simpson. Motion was withdrawn. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5191, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR DINING ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NO. 87-5055 AND 87-5071." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. (1) A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 86-4932 AND RESOLUTION 87-5056; AS AMENDED, REGARDING THE RESIDENTIAL ENCROACH- MENT PERMIT LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENT AND APPROV- ING AN UPDATED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ENDORSEMENT PROCEDURE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated October 14, 1988. A staff report was presented by City Attorney Lough. Action: To send this item back to the City Attorney to remove the insurance requirements for all residential encroachments. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. (m) Recommendation to accept work as complete - Beach Drive storm drain/sanitary sewer/street improvements. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 19, 1988. 3 Minutes 10-25-88 (n) Action: To approve staff recommendation to: accept as complete CIP 87-302, Beach Drive Storm Drain/Sewer/ Street Improvements constructed by Colich & Sons and authorize staff to: Release the 10% retention payment to Colich & Sons, Release Colich & Sons from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond, and file a Notice of Completion. Recommendation to award contract for slurry sealing - CIP 87-170 and Asphalt street repairs, CIP 87-171, FY 88-89. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 11, 1988. Action: To approve staff recommendation to: Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract for construction with Roy Allen Slurry Seal at a cost not to exceed $141,737; au- thorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Harris and Associates for administration and inspection services at a cost not to exceed $21,802; authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (o) A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT RETIREMENT CORPORATION. For adoption. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed October 19, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5192, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ESTABLISH A DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN ADMINIS- TERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT RETIREMENT CORPORATION." 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-958 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE II (TITLE); SECTION 17-50; SECTION 13-8; SECTION 13-14; SECTION 29.5-5; AND ADDING SECTION 29-18.1; TO ESTABLISH AND CLARIFY PRO- CEDURES REGARDING GAMES TO CHANCE, GAMBLING, APPEALING DECISIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON TENTATIVE MAPS, AND COSTS OF CONVERSION OF UTILITY FACILITIES. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-958. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 88-962 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 19- 96 OF HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING THE RATE FOR METER FEES IN LOT H (74 -14TH STREET) TO TWENTY-FIVE CENTS PER HOUR. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-962. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. 4 r Minutes 10-25-88 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1 a, e, k, 1, and n were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clariy. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED 17' PARKING SETBACK AT 222 - 24TH STREET. (Paul Herriott and Robert Aprahamian appellants) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 18, 1988. Supplemental memoran- dum from Building & Safety Director William Grove dated October 25, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Schubach, and Building and Safety Director Grove. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: ,Steven Colin - 21515 Hawthorne Blvd. Torrance - rep- :resenting the appellants,- submitted photographs of 24th Street, Ozone Court, Loma Drive and alternate plans Doug Scott - 222 24th Street - applicant Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue # 9 - supports project The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5193 entitled "A ;RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A GARAGE TO ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED SEVENTEEN FOOT (17') SETBACK AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 222 24TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY POR- TION OF LOT 12, BLOCK 3, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT.. Motion Simpson, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None A recess was called at 9:20 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:33 P.M. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF HYDROLOGY REPORT AND CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR AN 8 LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 532, 534-540 20TH STREET (POWER STREET). (Continued from October 11, 1988 meeting). This item was withdrawn. 5 Minutes 10-25-88 7. RECOMMENDATION TO INCREASE ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS ON CER- TAIN CITY ORDINANCES. Memorandum from City Manager Ke- vin B. Northcraft dated October 5, 1988. (Continued from October 11, 1988 meeting.) Action: To affirm the phased -in enforcement of existing ordinance provisions regarding dog defiling and leashes upon the Greenbelt, trash enclosures, and posting of signs in the public right-of-way, with a goal of a January 1st enforcement date. Temporary signs along right-of-way appx. every 200 feet to inform public when we will be begin enforcing, and perhaps warning notices given until the enforcement date. It was suggested that information be provided with dog licenses regarding the leash and defiling laws. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER None 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) (c) Appointment of Bicentennial Committee. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 6, 1988. (Continued from October 11, 1988 meeting.) Action: To appoint to the Hermosa Beach Bicentennial Committee: Kathleen Midstokke, George Schmeltzer, and Lance Widman; and that the above appointees be au- thorized to appoint additional volunteers to serve on this committee. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Request for City Council to schedule a joint meeting with the Civil Service Board. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert. Blackwood dated October 18, 1988. Action: To approve the setting of a meeting, and have the Mayor call it when an agreeable date is set. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. Approval of selection process for commissioners. Memo- randum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated Oc- tober 20, 1988. Supplemental memorandum from City Clerk dated October 25, 1988. Action: To be sent back to staff and City Attorney for review. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. 6 Minutes 10-25-88 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request from Councilmember Williams for discussion of increasing required distance between off -sale alcohol establishments and residentially zoned property. Action: Refer to staff for report back regarding in- creasing the distance, survey other cities. Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered. At this time Councilmember Creighton inquired regarding informa- tion on the use of Prop A funds for the right-of-way acquisition. Mayor Rosenberger referred this back to staff for a reply. (b) Request from Councilmember Williams for discussion re. delay in enforcing alcohol conditional use permits. Action: City Attorney Lough stated that a memo will be prepared regarding when notices went out to the affected businesses and distributed to City Council. (c) _ Request by Councilmember Williams for clarification of adult video restrictions in C-2 area. Action: Referring to a memorandum prepared by the City Attorney on this subject, the City Attorney was in- structed to edit for public review and bring back to the City Council for review. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. (d) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for status report of Multi -Use Corridor study plans. Action: The Mayor directed staff to: make recommenda- tions whether entire area needs to fall under this Moratorium; review the work that has already been done; and the height limit and calculation. (e) Councilmember Williams read a letter from Mrs. Sheehy regarding cleaning up the City. Proposed Action: Staff to respond with a written answer regarding the question raised that Council is not receiving all their mail. Motion Creighton. Motion was withdrawn. 7 Minutes 10-25-88 11. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Richard Sullivan - 3rd Street - complained regarding trash and mess at 3rd and PCH and noise from music at Hermosa Salloon. He submitted a letter regarding this complaint. City Manager will prepare follow-up report. At this time Councilmember Sheldon discussed Besties regarding windows on the west side, loud music and review of their CUP. Staff will get back on this business also. Debbie Lou - 843 -3rd Street - requested information regaring the MultiUse Corridor. At this time the Council thanked Mr. Doug Nielsen from MultiVi- sion Cable for operating the camera tonight due to the absence of our regular cameraman. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California adjourned on Tuesday, October 25, 1988 at the hour of 10:40 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 1988 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. fadeee.friite..tita*ze..) City Clerk 8 Minutes 10-25-88 t FINANCE-SFA340 ▪ TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H CCAPA '88 CONFERENCE CONF REG/A. PEREA - • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0001 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02554 001-400-4101-4317 00027 $205.00 TR219 - --10/20/88 PLANNING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE ▪ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $205.00 H CRIME PREV ADVISORY COUNCIL TUITION/M. DERKS --- TR220 02553 001-400-2101-4316 11/02/88 POLICE 00282 $50.00 /TRAINING ▪ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** r H OFCR MICHELE*DERKS 02134 001-400-2101-4316 MEALS/DARE SEMINAR --- -- TR220 ----- -11/02/88 - POLICE $50.00 00283 $250.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H HOWARD JOHNSON RESORT HOTEL/M. DERKS DARE SEM. TR220 - - 02555 001-400-2101-4316 11/02/88 POLICE $250.00 00284 $639.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H HUNTINGTON HARBOUR SR CITIZEN TRIP/12-15-88 $639.00 02556 001-400-4601-4319 00251 $280.00 11/02/88 COMM RESOURCES /SPECIAL EVENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS RADIO/PD EQUIP/4X4 TRUCK 02526 001-400-2101-5402 00006 11/01/88 POLICE $280.00 $2,560.02 /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/SEP 88 -- • H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. .-RETIREMENT/SEP .88 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00247 10/25/88 RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00248 10/25/88- RETIREMENT H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT/SEP 88 10/25/88 • 105-400-2601-4180 00082 STREET LIGHTING $2,560.02 $75,304.92 /RETIREMENT $72, 095. 35CR /RETIREMENT $713.96 /RETIREMENT TR219 00219 28080 $0.00 11/03/88 TR220 00220 28085 $0.00 11/03/88 TR220 00220 28086 $0.00 11/03/8B TR220 00220 28087 $0.00 11/03/88 06574 28088 $0.00 11/03/88 06849 28084 $2,565.79 11/03/88 $0. 00 - -- 30. 00- 30. 0-30. 00 28082 11/03/88 28082 -11/03/88 28082 11/03/88 • J • J v i fp 0 • 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP_ H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/SEP RETIREMENT SYS. 88 RETIREMENT SYS. 88 -- - ...CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00082 10/25/88 $141.83 VEH PKG DIST /RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00082 $4,658.31 _10/25/88 .______..___ . _ PARKING ENF. ../RETIREMENT RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 88 RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT SYS. 88 - - RETIREMENT 88 -10/25/88 145-400-3401-4180 00055 $156.78 DIAL A RIDE /RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00055 _10/25/88-_ __.__..__ ESEA 00026 145-400-3403-4180 00006 10/25/88 BUS PASS SUBSDY /RETIREMENT $52.46 /RETIREMENT $15.94 SYS. 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00055 10/25/88____...___. CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT RETIREMENT SYS. 88 _ RETIREMENT 88 $190.71 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00082 10/25/88-. SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT $802.41 SYS. 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00006 RETIREMENT SYS. 88 $93.52 _10/25/88 .._ ._____ _ ._. LIABILITY INS _..../RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00006 $145.00 10/25/88 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/3RD QTR 00707 001-400-2201-4305 10/24/88 FIRE H STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 00707 SALES TAX DUE/3RD QTR_._.._._.__ _._._.._.____10/24/88 PAGE 0002 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $10, 180. 49 00240 $15.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 001-400-2201-4309 00565 $7.00 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H STEVE*WISNIEWSKI EVIDENCE PURCHASE FUND. $22. 00 01364 170-400-2103-4322 00001 $1,000.00 ..10/27/88._._... ... _ .... SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R A&B AIR CONDITIONING SHEET METAL/ELGIN SWEEPE _.. $1, 000. 00 $15,186.51 00002 001-400-3103-4309 00743 $75.00 ..10/04/88 .ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 28082 11/03/88 28082 11/03/88 -- 28082 11/03/88 28082 $0.00---11/03/88 - $0.00 28082 11/03/88 28082 .$0.00 _ 11/03/88 ...- $0. 00 -. $0. 00 $0. 00 28082 11/03/88 28082 11/03/88 -- 28082 .-. 28082 11/03/88 06298 28081 $0.00 11/03/88 06298 28081 $0.00 11/03/88 . -- , 07405 28083 $0.00 __.11/03/88 07216 28096 $75.00 11/03/88 ,.J I.4 � 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ------ - DEMAND LIST PAGE 0003 FOR 11/09/88 DATE 11/03/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL***•u****************************************************•>f*********** $75.00 • ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00279 $80.00 20693 00003 28097 ELEV MAINT/NOV 88---------20693-----11/01/88 ---.-- .--- -- -- -BLDG MAINT - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- - - $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00 R AMERICAN SOC OF CIVIL ENG. 02317 001-400-4202-4315 00029 $252.00 583415 07236 28098 DUES/PUBLICATIONS/ANTICH-83415- 10/24/88----------.-- PUB WKS ADMIN -----/MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • AMERICAN STYLE FOODS $252. 00 $0.00 -11/03/88 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00577 $197. 00 00103 28099 - - --- MISC CHCS/OCT 88 10/31/88--.-- - -_ -.- - POLICE --- ---- /PRISONER MAINTENANCE----------- -- $0.00 - - 11/03/88 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $197. 00 R ASPLUNDH 00487 105-400-2601-4311 00118 $1,362.44 72486 07217 28100 REPAIR VEHICLE/PUB WORKS --72486. .-..40/20/88 -.---.---.-- .... . - STREET LIGHTING -/AUTO -MAINTENANCE.--__.__._._.._.. __- $1,249.99- 11/03/88 - v *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,362.44 R AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER 01891 001-400-3104-4309 00086 $450.03 18117 00104 - MISC CHCS/OCT 88 - - -----.--.-18117- -- 10/31/88. ---- --- TRAFFIC SAFETY - /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ----- -.- $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $450.03 28101 11/03/88 R DANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00018 $417.96 00054 28102 LEASE PMT/NOV 88 ...----___.__.____....______...11/01/88 - ... . . - EGUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS . ........ ......__..._ _ $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $417.96 R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS 00251 001-400-3104-4309 00085 $1,174.44 35544/34011 06720 28103 TRAFFIC PAINT __.___ .._______-_34011-_-_._...10/-11./88 -_-.---....- - .._.. TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS --------.--. $1.171.50---11/03/88 --� w I *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,174.44 R ROBERT*BLACKWOOD MON EXP/OCTOBER 88 ; 00366 001-400-1203-4305 00168 $56.54 07024 28104 10/31/88 _--_ _ _._. _.__ .- . _ PERSONNEL-..... -../OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -.. _._____-_. --- - $0.00 - 11/03/88 rIP J .160 • 00. • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF. HERMOSA BEACH.-______._..___._.___..__ DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R r PAGE 0004 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $56.54 JIM*BLICKENSDERFER 01303 001-400-4601-4201 00241 $70.00 LIGHT TECH/OCT 15, 88_ ____ __.-___...10/24/88_-_-...-......__...._...COMM RESOURCES .. /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT---. - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $70.00 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00114 $2,831.92 r__.____.___._.__ PLAN CHECK FEES _....__.__-58583--__.09/30/88._..._._._..__...____. BUILDING. ._ __ . /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *2.831.92 06565 28105 $0.00. .11/03/88 58583 04979 28106 -- $2,730.00 11/03/88 - R W. ROBERT*BUCHINSKY 02116 001-400-4601-4201 00243 $130.00 06568 28107 SOUND TECH/10-13,23,-24.__ 10/25/88 COMM RESOURCES _./CONTRACT-_SERVICE/PRIVAT-.._______.__...._._$0.00--..11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $130. 00 R BUILDING NEWS, INC. 00413 001-400-4201-4305 00352 $13.63 . .PUBLICATIONS/BLDG__.___.________._285_.-_ 08/04/88._.__.__..._. _._ _ . BUILDING. _._. ../OFFICE. OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JAMES*BUROUE SOUND TECH/OCT ..15, 88 .___ $13.63 02544 001-400-4601-4201 00242 $61.75 _._._10/24/88_..___.._ COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC PARKS MAINT/OCT 88 .-____. _. _..00074 00599 001-400-3101-4201 ___.,.10/31/88__.__ _.._ . MEDIANS R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. PARKS MAINT/OCT 88 00074 . VENDOR TOTAL 00599 001-400-6101-4201 10/31/88 PARKS $61.75 285 04992 28108 _$0.00 11/03/88. - .- ... 00003 $3,000.00 8100074 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00126 $8,710.00 8100074 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ****************************.**************************************** $11,710.00 R CABLE EXCHANGE REPAIR DAMAGED CABLES/PD. 2200 06566 28109 - $0.00. 11/03/88 00061 28110 $0.00 . 11/03/88 00061 28110 $0.00 11/03/88 01415 001-400-8606-4201 00043 $1,200.00 2200 06889 28111 09/28/88 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE $1,200.00 11/03/88 J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -- . -------CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 PAGE 0005 DATE 11/03/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,200.00 •' R THE*CALIF PARK & REC. SOCIETY 00602 001-400-4601-4315 00039 $20.00 ----• RENEWAL/FY 88-89--------00317-------10/20/88 COMM RESOURCES—MEMBERSHIP-- I ESOURCES ---/MEMBERSHIP .. - -- - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** r R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE • t. WATER BILLINGS/OCT 88 $20.00 D-90-00317 06564 28112 `y 11/03/88 - — J R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00014 $1,826.34 00109 28113 WATER BILLINGS/OCT-88 10/31/88 MEDIANS /UTILITIES *** 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00263 $478.60 10/31/88 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES - $0.00 - 11/03/88 - - 00109 $0. 00 28113 11/03/88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00223 $1,147.70 00109 28113 WATER BILLINGS/OCT 88----------------10/31/88-.------.-- --. --- -_ PARKS - --./UTILITIES -----------------------_-... _. $0.00. 11/03/88 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,452.64 to, R CAO/HUMAN RESOURCES 00587 001-400-1203-4251 00094 $5,900.44 9 07025 28114 r- - PERSONNEL SERV/ 1ST- QTR88-----9------10/ 18/88- ------..-.- .-- - PERSONNEL . - /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ----- --- - - -- $0.00 11/03/88 ✓ , *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5,900.44 R CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY 02449 001-400-2101-4304 00295 $69.17 CELLULAR PHONE COST/SEP-25/28- ...09/27/88 ----.- .-. ..-- POLICE.- •- /TELEPHONE --- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $69.17 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-1202-4305 00181 $12.30 MISC CHGS/OCT 88 - - -- 11376---- - 10/31/88 -.. FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES .i, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** s r • R CHAMPION CHEVROLET $12. 30 178425/28 00910 $0.00 11376 01011 $0. 00 28115 11/03/88 28116 11/03/88 :J J 00014 001-400-4201-4311 00144 $172.10 01012 28117 J -- MISC CHCS/OCT 88 10/31/88 ---- BUILDING- --- /AUTO MAINTENANCE-- -------- ----------- $0.00- 11/03/88- ----i R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 110-400-3302-4311 00415 $15.21 01012 28117 1 ,J MISC CHCS/OCT 88 10/31/88 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 11/03/88 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 _.._.._._ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 PAGE 0006 DATE 11/03/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $187.31 R D. L. *CHAPMAN 02547 110-300-0000-3302 24236 $50.00 731481 07302 28118 CITE. PMT. REFUND_._ ._ _._31481-__.41/01/88- -/COURT-FINES/PARKING----.--_-. --. $0.00_-. 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CINTAS CORPORATION ...UNIFORM RENT/OCT_ 88 ._. $50. 00 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00101 $489.81 ___.10/31/88.____... ___.. PUB WKS ADMIN ..-_/UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00002 28119 . $0.00 . 11/03/88 -- CINTAS .- CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00151 $42.00 00002 28119 UNIFORM RENT/OCT 88--_._._. 10/31/88 . PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE . .. $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $531.81 R COMPUADD CORPORATION 02303 001-400-4202-4305 00335 $9.49 DISC STORAGE BOX .17336 ___.... 10/12/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $9. 49 517336 06709 $9. 49 28120 11/03/88 R CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING CTR 02546 001-400-2101-4312 00766 $55.00 07402 28121 TUITION/S. WISNIEWSKI _ 10/26/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $55.00 • R THE*DAILY BREEZE 00642 001-400-1208-4201 00492 $557.76 392210-000 06940 28122 DISPLAY ADD/DID NUMBERS 0-000 _ 10/31/88 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $557. 76 R DALE & BARNEY'S TELEVISION 02362 001-400-1101-4305 00206 $133.97 33056/33057 04550 28123 EMERG REPAIR/RECORDER 33057 _ . 10/10/88 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $133.97 R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00463 $93.50 39082 00047 28124 TAPE STORAGE/SEP12-OCT11 39082 10/12/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/03/88 �J '"t'Q./ ------- ,/ rI m*mcE-wr*u*w DEMAND LIST PAGE 0007 .TIME 15:02:13 FOR 11/09/88 DATE 11/03/88 : QV PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION y *** VENDOR TOTAL VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ^=w . *93.50 ` cw ~~ • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00003 *695.46 106575 07e43 28125 :w -owY m^IwT/AuG oe__----m6n7o-40/18/88' TnArrzo SAFETY /CONTRACT asevzos/movr _ *V.on 11r03/8e _-_ — / n DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 105-400-2601-4e51 00066 $695.46 106575 07243 28125 ! ~' HWY MAINT/AUG 88 - -06575--- -10/18/88-- STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 11/03/88 � ~ *** VENDOR TOTAL *1.390.92 n DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 01200 001-400-3104-4309 00084 **2.60 81052880 06779 28126 PUBLICATIONS/PUB WORKS 5e880'---10,25,88 - TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS.-- $0.00 11/03/e8 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************** ********** / ~~ , R DETMERS 02523 001-400-6101-4309 00593 $251.11 1213 06783 28127 SWING SET CHAINS - -- - -1213 10/20/88 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS- - *upo.ou 11/03/ee y *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** *251.11 n EL CAMINO COLLEGE TuITzow/sovsnT/LswIo 01469 001 -*00-2101-4312 00767 $5.00 07401 28128 �� ` 10r26/8e POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *o.00 11/03/88 ▪ *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** • ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00010 *1.736.78 00060 28129 LEASE PMT/NOV 88 ' 11/01r88 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS *o.00 11/03/8e °^ *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** ~~ R M. o*AnLEe*FogG 0e542 001 -300-0000-3814 00034 *266.50 62665 04563 2e130 REFUND APPEAL FEE 62665 10/31/88 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL $0.00 11/03/88 "~. R M. o*«nLEo*Fouo 0e542 001-300-0000-3825 00036 *10.00 62665 04563 2e130 `O r-_ REFUND APPEAL FEE --'----62a65-----xo/3x/ao----- -- ' - /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING ----------$0.00 11/03/88 — . ~~..| R M. c*AnLsa*rooG 02542 001-400-1121-4323 00040 $72.00 REFUND APPEAL FEE - - 62665 - - 10/31/88 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING 62665 04563 *o.0011/03/88 28130 )4 • �� FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ..__CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH-"--- - -.. DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 FOR 11/09/88 DATE 11/03/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $348.50 R GATES MC DONALD 02538 705-400-1217-4201 00035 $2,485.00 02-019647 00044 26131 2ND QTR SERV/SEP-NOV.88._.1.9647______. 10/11/88_._.._......_. .__. WORKERS COMP ../CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT . $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******•************************************************************* $2,485.00 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00058 001-400-6101-4309 00594 $355.36 01024 28132 _. MISC CHGS/OCT 88 ... ._..____. _ ___ _.10/31/B8_....._ . .. PARKS. _ _... . /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS."_ ....._ .. $0.00 11/03/88 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00058 105-400-2601-4309 00409 $116.84 01024 28132 MISC CHCS/OCT 88 . 10/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $472.20 R RONALD*GLEISTEIN 01275 001-210-0000-2110 02509 $50.00 67421 07112 28133 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 67421_.____... _10/27/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R • MS CHERYL*GOODMAN REIMB TRAINING COST $50.00 02453 001-400-2101-4312 00769 $21.00 10/26/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $21.00 ' 06899 28134 $0.00 11/03/88 R GTEL 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00130 $108.20 01026 28135 EQUIP RENT/OCT 88 .. .. _. 10/31/88 FIRE /TELEPHONE $0.00 11/03/88 R GTEL EQUIP RENT/OCT 88 _-. 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00223 $100.63 10/31/88 _ COMM RESOURCES ./TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $208.83 01026 $0.00 28135 11/03/88 R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00401 $659.66 8784/8854/8902 07220 28136 STREET SWEEPER PARTS ______/8902__.__ _._ 10/26/88 _...._ ST MAINTENANCE. /AUTO MAINTENANCE . .-. "$649.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $659.66 R HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY 00946 001-400-2201-4309 00566 $183.21 H50419 05354 28137 _HOSE ROLLERS ____ __ ..._._ _.__50419__._.-_. 10/12/88 __...._.. _._ .... .. FIRE ..... . ._ /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS-__. __$362.10 11/03/88 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -r----------CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH --- _. _ ... _ ... _ ... DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 FOR 11/09/88 DATE 11/03/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY 00946 001-400-2201-5401 00002 $501.62 9807781/98077 05351 28137 HYDRANT FLOW TUBES 98077 10/26/88 FIRE /E4UIP-LESS THAN $500 $501.62 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $684.83 R HEKIMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 02541 001-400-8601-4201 00035 $615.00 FUEL TANK TESTING - - 5631--.. 07/29/88 - CIP 86-601 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RICHARD L.*RESTER OIL EVAL/AUG-SEP 88 $615.00 5631 06466 $0.00 28138 11/03/88 02545 001-400-1101-4201 00034 $4,269.01 06642 28139 11/01/88-- - CITY COUNCIL -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4,269.01 R HIWAY MARKING SYSTEMS 00280 001-400-3104-4309 00083 $335.06 SAFETY WARNING SIGNS ------ 4878-----------10/26/88 -- TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS r *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $335.06 R HOZIES RADIATOR SERVICE 00277 001-400-3103-4311 00403 $122.74 RECORE RADIATOR 90459------- 10/17/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $122.74 4878 06781 $293.09 90459 06766 $122.74 28140 11/03/88 28141 11/03/88 R ICMA 00157 001-400-4202-4305 00334 $24.75 06421 28142 PUBLICATIONS/PUB. WORKS -- 11/02/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 11/03/88 v • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $24.75 R INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGRS 02552 001-400-4202-4316 00114 $25.00 07239 28143 SUBSCRIPTION/A. ANTICH 10/26/88 • PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 11/03/88 ►. *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************.**************************************** �+ R INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE r $25.00 00068 001-400-1208-4201 00493 $253.00 08X4089 06300 28144 MAINT CHCS/NOV 88 X4089 10/14/88 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/03/88 1 d zeo v v „"” v • OP FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL DUES/R. BLACKWOOD_ _. _.________ J PAGE 0010 1 • DATE 11/03/88 ••/ INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $253.00 02551 001-400-1203-4315 00028 $60.00 _ PERSONNEL .. __MEMBERSHIP --------------- *** _/MEMBERSHIP .. .-.__._._.___..___. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** s 1i • R. JONCICH, STURM & ASSOCIATES _ ..._DESIGN CC WALL VENTS...___._._1040 R JONCICH, STURM & ASSOCIATES COMM CTR AIR COND.DESIGN -1025 $60.00 02159 001-400-8604-4201 00087 $500.00 _.___.___.10/10/88._______.__.._ ......CIP 86-604 ___/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT . 02159 001-400-8610-4201 00001 07/21/88 .-. CIP 88-610 R JONCICH, STURM & ASSOCIATES 02159 001-400-8612-4201 00002 DESIGN CITY HALL._._____.________1040__._._____..10/10/88.____.. ___.... _ ._.. CIP 88-612 $2,739.37 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 07022 28145 $0.00 -11/03/88 1040 06717 28146 $500.00 11/03/88 1025 06797 28146 $0.00 11/03/88 $800.00 1040 06718 28146 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT-____. . $800.00 ..11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4,039.37 R LAGUNA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT _.TUITION/WOLCOTT/BOHACIK 02136 001-400-2101-4312 00764 $150.00 10/26/88 —__ _ __ __ POLICE ...._.._ ..-. _ __/TRAVEL. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $150.00 07404 28147 -$0.00 11/03/88 R LAWSON PRODUCTS. INCORPORATED 00076 001-400-3104-4309 00082 *219.66 713413 06726 28148 ELECTRIC TERMINALS._____. _13413..._..,.10/07/88_._._.... .. . .__. TRAFFIC SAFETY .JMAINTENANCE MATERIALS _ .... . . $0.00 11/03/88- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $219.66 R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES SEMINAR REG/M. TERCERO ._........__... _____ 00317 001-400-1205-4316 00041 $75.00 __10/24/88._._. CABLE TV /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $75.00 R CHARLES H. *LEWIS MEALS/LEWIS/ECKERT 04418 001-400-2101-4312 10/26/88. _.. POLICE 00770 $14.50 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST . *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $14.50 R JAMES P. *LOUGH EXTRA LEGAL SERV/OCT 88 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00432 $2.716.00 10/31/88._.. CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT.. 06962 28149 $0.00 11/03/88 06896 28150 $0.00 11/03/88 06641 $0.00 28151 0.00 28151 11/03/88 416, FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 PAGE 0011 I' DATE 11/03/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R M. J. C. PROPERTIES $2,716.00 01504 001-300-0000-3115 01797 $200.00 624000/624300 01754 28152 BUS LICENSE REFUND --- - -24300----------10/24/88.---- - ._/DUSINESS LICENSE ----- - - - ----- $0.00 - 11/03/88 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-4201-4311 00145 $58.37 10/31/88----- BUILDING- ----/AUTO MAINTENANCE MISC CHGS/OCT 88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $58.37 i 01037 28153 _--.____ - $0.00 ..- 11/03/88---.-, R MANTEK 01943 001-400-3103-4311 00402 $116.69 30-61657 06730 28154 GUICK-CURE PACKS -------.--61657-----09/20/88---- ---.-- ST MAINTENANCE -/AUTO MAINTENANCE- ----- .-- ._ $112.89 11/03/88 .• *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** .r $116.69 R MCI MAIL 02153 001-400-1206-4304 00123 $10.00 7313075 00058 -.---- -.-. ELECTRONIC. MAIL/SEP-88.-_.13075-- 10/10/88---------.-_ __..._. DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE ------------- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $10.00 R v 28155 $0.00 - 11/03/88 - -- --. MERCURY AIR,GROUP 02537 001-141-0000-1401 00013 $2,215.33 59094 07230 28156 UNLEADED GASOLINE ---______-59094_-..-___-._.10/25/88.--.. .__._ ._ .. . .. _ /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 11/03/88 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,215.33 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 001-400-2101-4310 00152 $13.97 8839307843 06299 28157 MONTHLY PURCHASES/AUG 88 07843----.-__--10/10/88 _- POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES - $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $13.97 R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00744 $1,235.40 .MISC CHGS/OCT 88.-.---..-__-_---_._._._. ___._..10/31/88 - - ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS-- . *** ATERIALS--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,235.40 01038 $0.00 28158 11/03/88 KEVIN B.*NORTHCRAFT 02064 001-400-1201-4317 00153 $109.68 TR214 06640 28159 REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSES----..-.TR214_.._-__ 10/27/88 - . ---- CITY MANAGER .-- /CONFERENCE EXPENSE - $0.00 .- 11/03/88 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** - R PAGE 0012 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $109. 68 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 001-400-3101-4311 00002 $151.87 11100 07224 28160 STREET SWEEPER. PAINT______11100______10/19/88 MEDIANS__ ... /AUTO MAINTENANCE__ -----3151.87 -11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R * * * PACE PUBLICATIONS .PUBLICATIONS $151. 87 02549 001-400-2101-4305 00828 $179.00 06894 _10/25/88. POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** ,-, R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 COMP HOOKUPS/OCT.88___________10/31/88____ __ . __. _POLICE r ::....! *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $179. 00 00294 $209.42 . _ ./TELEPHONE _ R R • *** *** PAK WEST 00519 001-400-4204-4309 01117 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES .80274 10/18/88_ ALDG MAINT PAK WEST MISC CHGS/OCT 88 00519 001-400-4204-4309 01118 10/31/88 • BLDG MAINT $209. 42 28161 11/03/88 . 00036 28162 _30.00 11/03/88 $722. 23 580274 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS__ $89. 40 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R OFCR JOSEPH*PELKA REIMB LOSS/BURGLARY VENDOR TOTAL 00950 110-300-0000-3902 68153 11/01/88 $811.63 00007 $39.20 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR ******************************************************************** R PERSONAL COMPUTER CENTER REPLACE DISK/APPLE II 23915 $39. 20 02261 110-400-3302-5401 00008 $318.44 10/27/88 PARKING ENF /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R POWER SYSTEMS FLEC UPGRADE SERVICES $318. 44 07201 28163 $722.23 11/03/88- - , 01040 $0. 00 68153 07304 $0. 00 23915 06948 $318. 44 02557 001-400-8602-4201 00020 $597.00 31607/31689 07214 31689 10/06/88 CIP 86-602 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 28163 11/03/88 28164 11/03/88 28165 11/03/88 28166 11/03/88 s AN. 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH_. _ DEMAND LIST PAGE 0013 FOR 11/09/88 DATE 11/03/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL********************-********************************************-**** $597.00 R PRECIOUS METAL EXCHANGE 02543 001-300-0000-3115 01798 $98.80 587400 01753 28167 BUS LICENSE REFUND - --87400--------10/20/88----- ------ -- --- -- - /BUSINESS LICENSE --- --- -. - $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $98.80 R PRIMA 02366 705-400-1209-4305 00001 $32.00 07026 28168 ----------PUBLICATIONS PUBLICATIONS 10/25/88-------- --- LIABILITY- INS --- /OFFICE OPER-SUPPLIES---- ------ $0.00 ----11/03/88 --- -, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $32.00 R PUBLIC RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOC. 02550 705-400-1209-4316 00003 $156.00 07021 28169 r DUES/R. BLACKWOOD-------------------------10/24/88------------ - LIABILITY -INS -/TRAINING--- -- $0.00- --11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** -- R QUAIL & COOK $156.00 00409 001-400-1203-4201 00391 $385.00 81391 07023 28170 - SHORTHAND SERV/PHILLIPS-81391- 10/20/88-------------- -----PERSONNEL- - ---- --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT----- ----- $0.00- - 11/03/88-, *** 1/03/88--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $385.00 R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-2101-4305 00826 $45.74 01043 28171 -MISC CHGS/OCT 88 10/31/88--- ----- - - POLICE- -- - - --- /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - --- --------- -- $0.00- 11/03/88 R RADIO SHACK 01429 110-400-3302-4305 00471 $71.75 MISC CHGS/OCT 88 10/31/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $117.49 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 00173 001-400-2101-4305 00827 $143.78 MAKE 5 COPIES/DARE FILM H4720 09/10/88 210004 POLICE 01043 $0.00 H4720 06870 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $143.77 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $143.78 28171 11/03/88 28172 11/03/88 -1 R READICARE MEDICAL GROUP -LAX 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00216 $237.00 94-16903/17130 07020 28173 SEP PRE -EMP PHYSICALS 17130 10/11/88 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 11/03/88 W i • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R REGENTS U. C. . PUBLICATIONS PAGE 0014 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $237.00 01774 001-400-1203-4305 00167 $17.49 10/27/88 __.._._....... .. PERSONNEL . _._.._.._./OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** JIM*ROSENBERGER REIMS TRAVEL EXPENSE____ $17.49 01832 001-400-1101-4317 00281 $52.00 _10/26/88_ .__. CITY COUNCIL _.. /CONFERENCE -EXPENSE. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R S & J SALES INSTALL POWER SUPPLIES._..._10452 $52.00 07027 28174 $0.00- 11/03/88 06638 28175 $0.00 11/03/88 ---- 02500 ---.. 02500 001-400-8606-4201 00042 $372.75 10452 06890 28176 10/10/88 ._.. ... CIP 87-606 _. /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE-__ .__ $372.75 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. _.MISC CHGS/OCT 88 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHCS/OCT 88 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01119 10/31/88.___.___.. _..__...._ BLDG MAINT . .._. 01399 001-400-6101-4309 00595 _ 10/31/88 PARKS $372.75 $87.78 JMAINTENANCE MATERIALS..__ $130.73 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $218.51 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHGS/OCT 88 00114 001-400-2101-4306 00578 $40.09 10/31/88 POLICE R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 MISC CHGS/OCT 88 10/31/88 _. 001-400-4601-4319 00252 COMM RESOURCES /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $27.26 /SPECIAL EVENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $67.35 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00025 $1,012.00 BUS PASSES/SEP 88 . 45220.__.._. . 10/13/88 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2201-4309 MISC CHCS/OCT 88 19264_.___. _..10/13/88._ ... . FIRE $1,012.00 01046 28177 $0.00 . 11/03/88 01046 28177 $0.00 11/03/88 01047 28178 $0.00 11/03/88 01047 28178 $0.00 11/03/88 45220 06961 $0.00 28179 11/03/88 00568 $42.60 119264 01048 28180 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS. _ . ._ $0.00 .11/03/88 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0015 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************-*********** $42.60 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 CITE SURCHARGE/OCT 88--------- ----- 11/01/88------ - -- 24235 $13.857.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $13,857.00 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT -- CITE COURT BAIL- _ ----- 00400 110-300-0000-3302 10/27/88 07303 28181 $0.00 11/03/88 ---, 24238 $546.00 06965 . 28182 - /COURT-FINES/PARKING ---------- --- $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $546.00 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00264 $332.76 GAS BILLINGS/OCT 88----.------.--..-.-._10/31/88--- --------- --- BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES -- - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 WATER COOLER RENT/SEP-88-42302----.----09/30/88 R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 WATER COOLER RENT/SEP 88 98941-------.- 09/30/88 R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 WATER COOLER RENT/SEP-88 49154---_--09/30/88- $332. 76 001-400-2101-4305 00829 $65.65 POLICE- .. --/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES-- 001-400-4204-4201 UPPLIES-- 001-400-4204-4201 00280 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4601-4305 00566 - COMM RESOURCES 01053 28183 $0.00 -11/03/88 -- - .i I r , r 942302 00033 28184 - - $0.00 11/03/88- $36.10 1/03/88- $36.10 2298941 00033 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00 28184 11/03/88 $42. 65 949154 00033 28184 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - -- - . -- $0.00. 11/03/88.-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 SWEEPING SERV/OCT 88 ---2298------10/31/88_ R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEPING SERV/OCT 88 2298 00115 10/31/88 001-400-3103-4201 00191 ST MAINTENANCE 110-400-3301-4201 00184 VEH PKG DIST $144.40 $2,876.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $3.552.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS SUPPLY SPRINKLER WRENCH/FIRE 47458 02540 001-400-2201-4309 09/29/88 FIRE $6, 428. 00 00567 $16.40 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2298 00029 28185 $0.00 11/03/88 2298 00029 28185 $0.00 11/03/88 47458 05371 $0.00 28186 11/03/88 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0016 FOR 11/09/88 DATE 11/03/98 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT . INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $16.40 R SUNLINE INDUSTRIES 02539 001-400-4601-4305 00565 $681.32 MINI—BLINDS/COMM CENTER ..-_13929-________10/19/88 .__._._..._ ......_ COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE. OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $681.32 13929 06555 .._ .. $0.00 28187 11/03/88 SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 00425 001-400-2201-4309 00569 $21.00 71498 01055 28188 MISC CHCS/OCT 88_ .__.._. 71498_..__._ 10/13/88 _ _ FIRE .. /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .. . _. $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $21.00 R DONALD S.*TABUCHI 02548 110-300-0000-3302 24237 $41.00 673893 07301 28189 CITE PMT REFUND .._________73893.__..___..10/26/88 _....____.._.._... .... ._. ._. /COURT FINES/PARKING_.. _.._....__. __... $0.00 .. 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $41.00 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00596 $84.66' 889531 01057 28190 MISC CHGS/OCT 88 _. .___..-89531_.__.__...10/31/88.._...___ __ _. _ __ PARKS _ . /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS__ ._ . _. $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $84.66 R UC REGENTS 01056 001-400-4202-4316 00115 $350.00 CLASS REG/B. GENGLER____._...96600_____ 09/15/88_ _. _PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $350. 00 896600 06753 $350.00 28191 11/03/88 • R UNIFORM DELIGHT 02486 001-400-2201-4187 00119 $692.78 01059 28192 MISC CHCS/SEP.& OCT 88... 10/31/88 _ _. _ FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE..__ $0.00 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************. $692.78 r— ' R VANIER GRAPHICS CORPORATION 00309 001-400-1206-4305 00331 $421.00 137814/133536 06902 28193 WORD PRINTER PAPER . 33536._..___.__10/07/88 ._ . . DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES . $420.99 11/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $421.00 R VERNON PAVING COMPANY 00019 115-400-8171-4201 00007 $52,361.92 14271 07212 28194 STREET REPAIRS/SEP..88____..14271._. _...._09/22/88 .__ . _ __CIP 85-171 _ . .. /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT._. . $0.00 .. 11/03/88 .. 14 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/09/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR REIMB LIAB/OCT 88 - --- - -_ ._ PAGE 0017 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $52,361.92 02466 705-400-1209-4324 00080 $19.404.00 ---.10/31/88----- • LIABILITY INS ••/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SALLY A. *WHITE -- SEC SERV/OCT 18.88------ 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00177 $19.404.00 $272. 00 ---10/26/88---- ------- - PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JUNE*WILLIAMS REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSE $272. 00 01507 001-400-1101-4317 00280 $22.00 10/26/88---------- CITY -COUNCIL /CONFERENCE -EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STEVE*WISNIEWSKI. F- ------- - - - MEALS/POST. REQUALIFY $22. 00 01364 001-400-2101-4312 00768 $98.50 10/26/88-------------- POLICE .. - - ----./TRAVEL- EXPENSE . POST-------- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PAUL *WOLCOTT MEALS/WOLCOTT/BOHACIK- 00129 001-400-2101-4312 10/26/88 --------.- - - POLICE $98. 50 00765 $468.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R WRAY PRINTING PRINT SERV/PARKING-.----- $468. 00 00132 110-400-3302-4305 00472 $195.96 2776--- -- 10/25/88 --- -. --_ PARKING ENF -- /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES-- *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************, R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 _ MAINT CONT/DIABLO PRNTRS 10/21/88 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/NOV 88 $195. 96 001-400-1206-4201 00462 $525.00 -- DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00117 $321.08 97507 11/02/88 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS 07029 28195 $0.00 11/03/88 06059 28196 $0. 00 -11/03/88-- 06639 11/03/88--- 06639 28197 $0.00 - 11/03/88 09850 28198 --- $0.00 11/03/88- 07403 1/03/88- 07403 28199 $0.00 11/03/88 2776 06927 28200 - $195.96 11/03/88 - 00045 28201 $0.00 11/03/88 520497507 00049 28201 $0.00 11/03/88 J i L. +4« 1/4, • %mv CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 15:02:13 FOR 11/09/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00118 LEASE PMT/NOV 88 97506 11/02/88 GEN APPROP /LEASE R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00119 LEASE PMT/NOV 88 _________ . .. GEN APPROP -A-EASE R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2201-6900 00057 LEASE PMT/NOV 88 97503 11/02/88 FIRE R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00023 /LEASE LEASE PMT/NOV 88 _ . ANIMAL CONTROL -/LEASE R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 110-400-3302-6900 00105 LEASE PMT/NOV 88 _. _. 97504 11/02/88 PARKING ENF /LEASE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL ****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS ****************************************************************** PAGE 0018 DATE 11/03/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • *238.16 520497506 00050 28201 PAYMENTS *0.00 11/03/88 3943.72 520497045 00048 28201 PAYMENTS $0. 00 - - 11/03/88 $47. 62 PAYMENTS 520497503 00053 28201 $0.00 11/03/08 $56.15 520497504 00051 PAYMENTS- - $0.00 28201 11/03/88 $114.00 520497504 00051 28201 PAYMENTS $0.00 11/03/88 --• $2,245.73 $160, 334. 82 $175,521 33 • .10 • 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY :THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES_LTO/IINCLUSIVE OF THE WARRA REGISTER FOR nj Vtfie ARE ACCURATE AND D ARE AVAILABLEeOR ',1ENT THEREOF: BY FINANC ADMINISTRAI 0 DIMT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 2, 1988 City Council Meeting of November 9, 1988 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS November 22, 1988 Consent Calendar City Treasurer's Report - October Monthly Revenue Report - October Monthly Expenditure Report - October Application for Park Grant for Greenbelt Hearings Appeal of Planning Commission merging of lots at 1244 Second St. Appeal of Planning Commission merging of lots at 1001 Fourth St. Appeal of Planning Commission merging of lots at 912 - 18th St. Appeal of Planning Commission merging of lots at 1140 First St. Appeal of Planning Commission merging of lots at 1125 First St. Public Hearings Approval of resolution establishing fees for issuance and review of encroachment permits Municipal Matters Approval of engineering and traffic survey Approval of hydrology report and conceptual grading plan for 8 lot - 1 - Responsible Agent City Treasurer Finance Administrator Finance Administrator Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director Public Works Director Public Works Director 1 subdivision at 532, 534-540 20th St. (Power Street) Proposed revisions to City's noise ordinance Review of City Goals Council Matters Report on Tennis Court charges Selection process for commissioners December 13, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report - November City Manager Items City Manager salary review per agreement Public Works Director Public Safety Director City Manager Community Resources Dir. City Clerk City Treasurer City Manager ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Request to accept as complete CIP 87-606, first floor Police Dept. remodel including dispatch center Bicycle path repairs, CIP 87-165 Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium Uniform Fire Code Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location Public Works Director Public Works Director City Clerk General Services Director Planning Director Planning Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director City Attorney Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 31, 1988 City Council Meeting of November 9, 1988 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC, DEPOSITS_SFOR,_UERMQ5AAEQcH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of October 1988. Respectfully submitted, Gary Brutsc City Trea rer NOTED: Kevin Northcraf City Manager 111 .INUITUT.IQN ...,.a...... _ .TOTAL, INVESTMENT REPORT - OCTOBER 1988 _UTZ QF:_INY. ST_MENT._. U T E BALANCE 10/01/88 Withdrawal Withdrawal Withdrawal Balance 10/31/88 $2,970,000.00 (150,000.00) (100,000.00) (500,000.00) $2,220,000.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: c99fIy $ayirDgs Panic Investment $ 100,000.00 Qali ornia_Fecaral S & L Investment $ 100,000.00 Investment Is9Qg E3each $,&,L Investment Investment CP1.Amnricgnings Investment $ 99,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 99,000.00 $ 99,000.00 12/23/87 12/28/87 1/6/88 1/6/88 1/13/88 1/13/88 10/4/88 10/25/88 10/27/88 1/6/89 12/30/88 1/6/89 1/6/89 1/12/89 1/12/89 8.341% 8.375% 8.15% 9.0% 8.5% 8.5% 8.75% Pr12eual,_Say._ings Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Pact 1g ,$ayj.ng ank Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.85% $eXerly EJi11syS_ & ,L Investment $ 99,000.00 1/15/88 1/17/89 9.15% 1912n0er, S,_&.4 Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/3/89 8.625% IestkJ2Qd, S, & L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/5/88 2/3/89 8.50% QuttQr 1g1d_S,_& .4 Investment $ 99,000.00 2/18/88 2/22/89 8.20% 0910M G.gt„$.Qnk Investment $ 99,000.00 2/24/88 2/23/89 8.0% FluntIngton S & ,I, Investment $ 99,000.00 2/25/88 2/24/89 7.85% co1VmOa,_S _& L Investment $ 99,000.00 3/3/88 2/27/89 7.4% 11Q tern, Federal Investment $ 400,000.00 3/31/88 3/17/89 7.75% 0)19r1_Ee�era1 §(14, Investment $ 500,000.00 9/22/88 9/22/89 8.50% Un1QnJeteral V&it Investment $ 500,000.00 10/27/88 10/1/89 8.40% CORPORATE NOTES: ord_�IQtQr_ CrQdt ,Co Investment $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 @lorr14_Lynch ,R . CQ, Investment $ 500,000.00 6/30/88 1/2/90 ummit,�anc9r.Qraton Investment $ 500,000.00 9/15/88 10/16/89 FHLMC: Eecieral UQmo Loan,Mo;tgQge Corp3 Investment Investment $ 248,733.64 $ 249,320.88 TOTAL BALANCE $Z11_Qf ,Q24,.5 Respectfully Submitted, Gary Bruts City Treasurer 3/26/87 5/26/87 3/1/17 8/2/16 9.10% 8.35% 8.90% 8.0% 9.50% October 17, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STREET REPAIR AND RESURFACING PROJECTS CIP85-160 AND 87-171 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize staff to advertise Request for Proposals for Consultant Design Services related to the Street Repair Projects CIP85-160 and 87-171 and issue addenda as necessary. Background: At the June 14, 1988 meeting, City Council approved the third year projects of the FY 88-89 Capital Improvement Program, which included CIP 85-160 and 87-171. This item would provide for selecting a consultant for design of plans, specifications, cost estimates, and bidding documents for the two separate street repair projects. Analysis: A Request for Proposal has been prepared to solicit professional engineering services related to design of the two projects. Detailed descriptionsof the scope of services proposed, and a brief description of the project are contained in the Request for Proposal which is available for review in the office of the City Clerk. le Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 17, 1988 Page 2 Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: I. Drop the projects. 2. Modify the scope at work. Respectfully submitted, Annfhony Antich Concur: Kevin Northcraft L Director of Public 1 'orks City Manager EEE/ss proposal\hermosa\bid.2 October 17, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PARK IRRIGATION SYSTEM ASSESSMENT AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM CIP 87-508 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize staff to solicit proposals for engineering services for preparation of a Park Irrigation System Assessment and Rehabilitation Program, CIP- 87-508, and issue addenda as necessary. Background: At the June 14, 1988 meeting, City Council approved the third year projects of the FY 88-89 Capital Improvement Program. Included in the Capital Improvement Program is CIP 87-508 Park Irrigation Restoration. This item would provide for selecting a consultant for conducting an inventory and assessment of restoration needs for all city park irrigation systems . and a recommended plan for accomplishing the needed restorations. Analysis: A Request for Proposal has been prepared to solicit professional engineering services related to the Park Irrigation Restoration Program. A detailed description of the scope of services is contained in the Request for Proposals which is available for review in the office of the City Clerk. if Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 17, 1988 Page 2 Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Drop this project. 2. Modify the project scope. Respectfully submitted, An ony Antich Director of Public Works Concur: Kevin Northcraft City Manager EEE/ss proposal\hermosa\bid.3 October 31, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 8, 1988 ACCEPT WORK AS COMPLETE CITY HALL ELECTRICAL RENOVATION, CIP 86-602 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete CIP 86-602, City Hall Electrical Renovation, and 2. Authorize staff to: a) Release the 10% retention payment to Schulz Electric, Inc. b) Release Schulz Electric from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. 3. Authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion. Background: On April 18, 1988, City Council awarded a contract to Schulz Electric, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $42,859, for City Hall electrical improvements. Schulz installed a new generator with an automatic transfer switch to supply electrical power to the police dispatch room and City Hall computer room. A new automatic restart for the existing air conditioning was installed in the City Hall computer room. Computer electrical loads were separated from the existing panel in City Hall. Analysis: This analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. Construction A. Built according to Plans and Specifications B. Built within Time Schedule C. Notice of Completion D. Release of Bond 2. Fiscal Impact 1. Construction A. Built According to Plans and Specifications Joncich, Sturm & Associates' electrical engineer has inspected the work and has found it to comply with the plans and specifications. B. Built Within the Time Schedule Sixty (60) calendar days were allowed for construction. The completion date for all work was August 19, 1988. The project was completed on August 15, 1988 - 4 days ahead of schedule. lg C. Notice of Completion Schulz Electric has provided written certification that no liens have been filed against the City. Staff recommends that a Notice of Completion be filed. D. Release of Bond Pending City Council authorization, and after the Notice of Completion is recorded, staff will release the retention amount of $3,896.30 and will release Schulz Electric from the obligations of the following Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond: Bonding Company Indemnity Company of America 333 Wilshire Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 Original Bond Amount $38,963 Amount to be Released $38,963 Bond No. 962034P 2. Fiscal Impact Below is a summary of the project costs: Contract Amount Total Anticipated Not to Exceed Expenditure Design $ 11,000 $ 10,952 Construction 42,859 38,963 Inspection 2,400 2,400 400 Miscellaneous Costs -0- 641 Total $ 56,259 $ 52,956 This project was $3,303 under budget. All savings will be reflected in the mid year budget revisions. Alternative: An alternative considered by staff and available to City Council is: 1. Do not accept the project as complete. Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengle Assistant Engineer Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Schedule 2 Am 1 An" _v.ny Antic Director of P blic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator CONSTRUCT. SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : City Hall Electrical Upgrade - CIP 86-602 ACCOUNT NUMBER : TASKS 1 Final design approval before advertising for construction LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : nounimmimim ACTUAL SCHEDULE : X : 100% COMPLETE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 11111t111L11 I -I I I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 11111 I I date 012 Advertising period 1 ilium1 i (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening Review bids Award contract Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete '1388 1 1 I Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" 1 Anal 1111 111 11 111 1♦ 111111111111/1 11111111111111 1 1 111111111111111111111111 Retention Payment I 1 1 1111111 I 1111 Project close out 1 I 1 1 1111111111111111`11111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1• ► ®"4 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has previously sup- ported the Drug Free Education Task Force; and WHEREAS, the Drug Free Education Task Force has active- ly provided hundreds of lecturer hours to public high school stu- dents and parents on the subject of the effect of drugs and al- cohol on the individual and the family; and WHEREAS, the Drug Free Education Task Force has con- ducted a campaign to secure parent pledges for drug and alcohol - free teen partying in our City; and WHEREAS, the Drug Free Education Task Force has pro- vided financial support for counseling on the high school cam- puses for substance abusers; NOW, THEREFORE, I, JIM ROSENBERGER, Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby proclaim Saturday, Novem- ber 19, 1988 to be DRUG FREE EDUCATION NIGHT to support the fundraising event "AN EVENING WITH ELVIS FOR DRUG FREE EDUCATION". JfiONNaKv u.44eta‘ JIM ROSENBERGER, MAYOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk October 24, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 REQUEST FROM SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR A VALLEY DRIVE BICYCLE LANE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: a) Deny the request for a bicycle lane on Valley Drive, from Valley School to Gould Avenue. Backround: In June 1988, a member of the School District Board requested that the City consider extending the "No Parking from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm" on Valley Drive from The Hermosa Valley School to Gould Avenue. The belief was that the bicycle lane would provide greater protection for children riding their bicycles back and forth to school. Questionnaires were distributed to 185 residents in the area along Valley Drive and its adjoining streets. The side streets included 18th, 20th, 21st, 24th, 25th Streets and 24th Place residents. Fifty one (51) of the one hundred eighty four (185) questionnaires were returned. This represents a 27% response. The results are as follows: Of the 51 responses, 21 listed their addresses. The results of the total responses are: Response From In Favor Opposed Total Valley Drive Residents 4 4 8 Side Streets 2 11 13 Subtotal 21 No Addresses Listed 7 23 30 Total 13 38 51 Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: a) Bicycle Lane Standards b) Alternatives - c) Conclusion d) Fiscal Impact a) Bicycle Lane Standards Valley Drive is 30 feet wide along the majority of the section that has been requested for the bicycle lane. Both Nationally and Caltrans recognized standards require that a bicycle lane be lh four feet wide. All bicycle lanes are recommended for one way operation within that four feet. Travel is to be done in the same direction as automobile traffic. Two way bicycle lanes as well as sidewalk bicycle lanes are discouraged for safety and operational reasons. b) Alternatives In order to provide two four foot bicycle lanes on Valley Drive, the curb parking would have to be eliminated on a twenty four hour basis. This could result in the loss of up to 92 parking spaces. Time limit sharing of the bicycle lane parking is unacceptable and would force the bicyclist into the vehicular traffic lanes. This is not a desirable situation. If four foot bicycle lanes are considered then each of the Valley Drive vehicular through lanes would have to be 11 feet wide (4'+4'+11'+11'=30'). While 11 foot lanes are acceptable for through lanes, they would be narrow in comparison to the recognized standard of 12 feet. This could lead to safety concerns if the driver strayed over the centerline perhaps to the proximity of a child bicyclist in the bicycle lane. In addition, the potential of head on accidents could increase. c) Conclusion Thus, while the concept is fine, the implementation is not desirable from the safety, engineering nor residents standpoint. d) Fiscal Impact None Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Implement parking restrictions on the east and west side of Valley Drive and stripe the area for a bicycle lane. 2. Use the Greenbelt. Resp-ctfully submitted, An •ny Antich Director of Pu• is Works cc: Hermosa Beach School District Concur: evin B. N•rth. aft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The current situation is not good, but losing 92 spaces isa drastic cure. Limited use of the Greenbelt could be a viable alternative in that it would not cause a loss of parking and would add to safety by better separation from vehicular traffic. November 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 9, 1988 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH AUDIO GRAPHICS FOR INSTALLATION OF SCREEN AND PROJECTORS IN THE CIVIC THEATRE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council award bid for two 16mm projectors and electronic screen and installation of same to Audio Graphics Systems Inc., authorize Mayor to sign attached contract on behalf of the City and authorize staff to issue change orders as necessary. BACKGROUND City Council authorized expenditures for the above referenced theatre equipment. A theatre consultant was brought on board to design the specifications and a Request for Proposals was sent to 16 companies on May 26, 1988. ANALYSIS The following bids were received: Audio Graphics Systems Inc. V.J. Electronics, Inc. $35,496.41 $35,898.52 Both bids were reviewed and analyzed by the theatre consultant and staff. And references for both companies were also checked. The Dept. of Community Resources has done a great deal of work with V.J. Electronics and their work has always been very good. We have not worked with Audio Graphics in the past, however, their references were excellent. Only a limited number of distributers carry this equipment. That is why the response to the RFP was also limited. Many of the companies are just dealers. Audio Graphics, being one of the major distributors was called by several of the companies for prices. Additionally, there are very few companies that can provide the equipment and do installation both. The specification called for both. Staff and the consultant were very specific about the type of equipment to be purchased that would accommodate the City's needs. The equipment called out in the specification is for industrial professional equipment, the type used in schools and auditoriums. Staff took great care in selecting this equipment for its professional quality, sturdiness and reliability. Once the equipment is installed, film series and film premieres can be presented in the Civic Theatre. ii • The budget allocation is as follows: Budget: $38,500.00 Contract Amt.: 35,496.41 Contingency( 8%) 2,839.76 COST NOT TO EXCEED $38,336.17 This purchase of equipment is part of the second phase of the theatre remodel project. Concur: Kevin Northcraft City Manager Respectfully, Submitted, Alava Mastrian-Handman,Director Dept. of Community Resources • AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF FILM PROJECTORS AND THEATRE SCREEN AND INSTALLATION OF SAME FOR HERMOSA CIVIC THEATRE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 9TH day of NOVEMBER , 1988 by and between the CITY OF HERMSOA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and AUDIO GRAPHIC SYSTEMS hereinafter referred to as "GRAPHICS". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain GRAPHICS to perform services as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein and by this reference made a part hereof. WHEREAS, City General Fund shall be used for this project and GRAPHICS agrees to comply with all City regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. CITY agrees to retain GRAPHICS to perform services as herein set forth. 2. GRAPHICS shall perform all work as submitted in Exhibit B, necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in Exhibit "A" entitled Proposal and attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. 3. All information and data, as are existing and available from CITY, and necessary for carrying out the above referenced projects shall be furnished to GRAPHICS without charge 1 by CITY and CITY shall cooperate in every way reasonable in the carrying out of the work without delay. 4. GRAPHICS represents that it employs, or will employ at its own expense all personnel required in performing the services required under this Agreement. 5. All of the services required hereunder will be performed by GRAPHICS or under its direct supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized or permitted under state and local law to perform such services. 6. CITY's Director of Community Resources (the "Director" or designee) shall direct GRAPHICS to proceed and the work required shall be completed within the time limit mutually agreed upon. GRAPHICS shall have no claim for compensation for any services upon which the Director has not authorized GRAPHICS to proceed. 7. GRAPHICS shall work closely and cooperate fully with the Director, or designee, who shall be the liaison between GRAPHICS and the CITY and who shall review and approve all details of the work as it progresses. 8. The CITY reserves the right to terminate or suspend the Agreement at any time upon three (3) days written notice effected by personal delivery or by a bona fide mail service, which shall be deemed communicated as of the date of receipt thereof, under any of the following circumstances: 2 (a) The project, as described in the attached Exhibit "Au is to be abandoned or indefinitely postponed. (b) GRAPHICS fails to complete the work within the time limits specified in the attached Exhibit "B". (c) Unsatisfactory performance by GRAPHICS. 9. No change in the scope of the work to be performed by GRAPHICS shall be made except in writing between CITY and GRAPHICS, which shall set forth the changes mutually agreed upon by the CITY and GRAPHICS. 10. The CITY agrees to pay GRAPHICS in full, upon completion of project to the satisfaction of CITY. 11. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, GRAPHICS shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all persons employed in the performance of services as set forth herein. GRAPHICS shall provide the CITY with a certificate verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind. 12. GRAPHICS shall carry Liability insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000. GRAPHICS shall provide the City with certificates verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy shall rquire thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing prior to cancellation, termination or expiration of any kind. 3 All insurance policies shall name the City of Hermosa Beach as additional insured. 13. If GRAPHICS fails to maintain such insurance, the CITY may obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. 14. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which GRAPHICS may be held responsible to payment of damages to persons or property resulting from its operations or any operations of any subcontractors under it. GRAPHICS will be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers and employees from any claims, damages, or expenses, including attorney's fees and court costs, arising out of GRAPHICS negligent performance under this Agreement. 15. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court. 16. This Agreement shall begin upon execution and shall expire on the date shown on the Notice to Proceed unless extended in writing by mutual agreement by both CITY and GRAPHICS. 4 17. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, but it shall not be assigned by GRAPHICS without the written consent of the CITY. 18. GRAPHICS shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or otherwise) without the prior written approval of the CITY, provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due GRAPHICS from the CITY under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust comany, or other financial institution or to a Trustee in Bankruptcy, without such approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the CITY. 19. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and GRAPHICS shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance. 20. This Agreement supercedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of GRAPHICS by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not 5 A MIMMEMMEMMEMMA �► se' y May 26, 1988 Exhibit A 1 of 6 City o f2-iermosaTeaclt. Dear Sir/Madam: Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 The City of Hermosa Beach is soliciting proposals for the following: Two 16mm Projectors and installation Motor -operated projection screen and installation Your proposal can address one of the above projects or both. Your response to this RFP must be according to the attached, PROPOSAL FORM. Sealed proposals must be submitted to the office of the City Clerk, prior to the 2:00 p.m. opening of proposals on Thursday, June 16, 1988. No late proposals will be accepted. Proposals are to be submitted to: Office of City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (213) 376-6984 ext. 203 Should you have any questions regarding the proposals, please contact Ms. Mary Rooney of the Department of Community Resources at 376-6984 ext. 280. Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Enclosures City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376.2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376-6984 Exhibit A 2 of 6 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Hermosa Beach is se�x eking a request for proposal for a _ !s �^ ++rcvrrseti motor-operated-:_projeetion screens with said proposal to include the installationof'sai'd scr'eeri'in the Hermosa Beach Civic Theatre, 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, 90254 Your proposal shall include all systems necessary for a complete operational system in conformance with the following specification. SPECIFICATION Special Requirements The Contractor is required* to be licensed as a Contractor by the State of California and be experienced in the installation of motor -operated projection screens of the quality and complexity as specified herein. The Contractor shall submit with his proposal a list of references of projects with scope of similiar nature for review by the owner. The Contractor shall assume complete responsibility for sub -assembly design and fabrication, transporation and installation of all equipment and hardware and for all labor required to complete the work under this specification. Reference Standards The work shall conform to all codes and authorities having jurisdiction. Work Layout Become thoroughly familiar with the as -built conditions prior to submission of proposal. Carefully check and verify all pertinent dimensions in the field. Electrical conduit and wiring has been installed between the elecrical panel located at stage right and a ceiling mounted J -box on the stage right side of the proposed projection screen. The above conduit and J -box is provided for the screen motor, verify the condition in the field. Notify the owner at the time of submission of any difficulties that may prevent proper installation of the work. Guarantee All equipment provided shall be unconditionally free from defects and workmanship for a period of one-year from the date of final acceptance. 1 Exhibit A 3 of 6 Projection Screen Projection Screen shall be Stewart Filmscreen Co. "Electriscreen Model C" electric motor operated roller mounted seamless vinyl, fire and fungus resistant ULTRAMATTE 200; screen image size to be 25' wide by 15' high with black edges at sides. Screen roller to be of lightweight black aluminum stressed to eliminate sag. Motor and limit switch unit to be on the audience left end of roller (stage right), 120VAC 60HZ. "Switching circuit to be 24VAC 60Hz". Screen case to be lightweight 1/4" mahogany plywood. Screen MaskinE Side masking flats shall -also be provided. Flat frames shall be built of 1" X 3" pine (or equivalent wood) and covered with black duvatine. Side masking flats shall be 18'6" tall and 6'0" wide. Screen Placement Screen placement (location) shall be coordinated with theatre technicians before installation. END OF SPECIFICATION Exhibit A 4 of 6 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Hermosa Beach i,s seeking a request for proposal for two,(2 1.6.inm film A5TOjeetors, said proposal to include labor and materials;=for he irista" l%- on of said projectors in the Hermosa Beach Civic Theatre, 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, 90254. Your proposal shall include all systems necessary for a complete operational system in conformance with the following specification. SPECIFICATION Special Requirements The Contractor is required to be licensed as a Contractor by the State of California and be experienced in the installation of 16mm film projection systems of the quality and complexity as specified herein. The Contractor shall submit with his proposal a list of references of projects with scope of similiar nature for review by the owner. The Contractor shall assume complete responsibility for sub -assembly design and fabrication, transporation and installation of all equipment and hardware and for all labor required to complete the work under this specification. Reference Standards The work shall conform to all codes and authorities having jurisdiction. Work Layout Become thoroughly familiar with the as -built conditions prior to submission of proposal. Carefully check and verify all pertinent dimensions in the field. Projectors are to be placed in the light booth located at the rear of the theatre. Notify the owner at the time of submission of any difficulties that may prevent proper installation of the work. Guarantee All equipment provided shall be unconditionally free from defects and workmanship for a period of one-year from the date of final acceptance. I. Projectors Two projectors shall be provided. Projectors shall be EIKI EX -4000P projectors. An EIKI changeover system shall also be provided. Exhibit A 5of 6 II. Lenses Each projector shall be provided with lenses capable of projecting a 15'X 20'image at a distance of approximately 100'. Lenses shall also be provided to project a 15'X 25' cinemascope image at a distance of approximately 100'. One set of lenses, to include a 25mm, 38mm, 50mm and 200mm converter (fits 38mm), shall also be supplied. All lenses shall be EIKI. No more than two lenses of any one length are required. III. Audio A line level audio feed from projectors shall be connected to house sound system. Overall volume shall be controllable from booth. IV. Stands Two sturdy projector stands shall be provided. Top shelf of stand shall be angled downward to provide correct alignment of projectors and screen. V. Cases Sturdy flight cases for the projectors and power supplies shall be proveded. One projector and one power supply shall fit one case. Case shall have two handles (one on each side). VI. Accessories All accessories, as specified in Addendum 1, shall also be provided. Please list individual prices for each item(s). 2 Exhibit A 6 of 6 ADDENDUM 1 5 Take-up reels - 2400' metal 1 Tape splicer 2 Rewinds 4 Spare projector bulbs 2 Sets of projector fuses 2 Sets of projector belts 12 Cans of compressed air w/nozzle END OF SPECIFICATION AG'S AUDIO GRAPHIC SYSTEMS AUDIO VISUAL SALES, SERVICE & RENTALS 15207 MARQUARDT AVENUE SANTA FE SPRINGS. CA. 90670 (213) 921-0707 (714) 994-1052 (800) 231-5138 Exhibit B 1 of 6 AUDIO GRAPHIC SYSTEMS takes pleasure in submitting the following proposal, in accordance with specifications included herein, to The City of Hermosa Beach located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254, to the attention of Marsha Ernst at (213) 376-6984 for the sale and installation of a Projection System. DESCRIPTION: Install a 25' x 15' Stewart electric projection screen, model C with Ultramtte 200 on stage ceiling behind first black top border curtin. The screen will be attached to the slotted track which supports the stage curting by 4 each 'e threaded rods (2 at each end). A low voltage screen control box will be wall mounted next to the electrical panel on the left side of the stage. One (1) control switch will be mounted on the left stage wall in the area of the electri- cal panel and one (1) control switch will be installed in the projection room at the rear of the theatre. The two (2) control switches will control screen up/down functions. The stage control switch will over -ride and have priority over the projection room control switch. A five (5) conductor cable will be ran thru the theatre attic and connect the two (2) control switches. A two (2)_ conductor/shielded audio cable will be ran in the attic area from the projection booth to the theatre sound system located on the left side of the stage. This will be a balanced -line level audio line connected to a surface mounted/stero/ la" phone jack in the projection booth and to a customer supplied auxiliary audio input on the theatre stage sound system. A control will be provided in the projection room to control the volume of the projector audio. Two (2) black, projection screen masking panels ( approximately 20' high and 6' wide) will be provided. The panels will be constructed of Pine and covered with black duvatine fabric. The screens will hang behind the front/top border/black curtin and the left and right side border curtins. All exposed wiring on the walls will be ran in conduit or wiremold. Set-up and install two (2) each slide projectors on projection stands and tie into system (audio line level). Supply the listed accessories and cases. MATERIAL: Audio Cable, Hooks, Screen Fabric, Misc. mounting hardware. ELECTRICAL: To be provided by customer except from screen to plug in, at base as described above. EQUIPMENT: 1 each Projection Screen, 25' x 15' Stewart Model C Page 1 of 3 EQUIPMENT CONT.: Exhibit B 2 of 6 2 each Eiki EX4000P Xenon Pxojector$. 2 each Eiki # 6512 Change Over Kits 2 each 25mm Lens 2 each 38mm Lens 2 each 50mm Lens 2 each Zoom Conversion Lens 2 each ATA Shipping Cases w/ casters and two handles 5 each Eiki Vision 2000' Take-up Reels (Plastic w/ easy rewind) 1 each DAVSC Splicer/Viewer 2 each DAVSC Rewinds 4 each AX10301 Spare Lamps 2 each F02 -603U Fuses 2 each F15-6030 Fuses 2 each 241-12821 Motor Belts 2 each 320-13151 Supply Arm Belts 2 each 241-14321 Take -Up Belts 2 each 241-14052 Rewind Belts_: 2 each 260-15211 Drive Belts 2 each 241-12191 Motor Rewind Belts 12 cans Compressed air w/ nozzle 2 each Custom Projection Stands EQUIPMENT TOTAL $29,972.22 INSTALLATION TOTAL $ 3,306.00 SALES TAX $ 1,948.19 FREIGHT $ 270.00 TOTAL COMPLETE $35,496.41 Terms: Net 30 Days FOB: Origin on Equipment ESTIMATED TIME OF DELIVERY OF EQUIPMENT: 30 Days ARO ESTIMATED TIME OF COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION: 14 to 21 Days ARE *This proposal is good for 60 days. **A11 agreements are subject to strikes, accidents, and/or causes beyond our control. ***Any and all changes not apporved at time of acceptance of proposal will be an addition to the system and a purchase order/change order will be issued by the City of Hermosa Beach, unless approved otherwise by our Systems Support Manager, Sharon Blevins. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: (not included in our pricing) 1. A.C. power is to be supplied by the customer. 2. Auxiliary audio input on sound system to be supplied by customer. 3. This proposal does not include permits, bonds, or city licenses, if any of these are required it will be in addition to our quote and a change order will be issued. 4. If you perfer the Metal 2000' reels instead of the Eiki you would use part # DAVSC 2000', and pricing would be adjusted as per original bid. COMMENT SECTION: The installation price includes one (1) hour of instructional training, if required, on system. Page 2 of 3 Exhibit B 3 of 6 COMMENT SECTION CONT.; Any additional training xequixed will be billed separately at $35.00 per hour. The installation of equipment is under warranty for 6 months, the equipment contained in system carries the individual manufacturer's warranty. Once system is completed and approved, any equipment or functions of installation that are re -adjusted, modified, moved or vandalized by anyone other than the installing company, thus causing operational problems, will be handled as a service call not covered under warranty, and will be billed at $45.00 per hour. INSTALLER CALIFORNIA STATE CONTRACTOR LICENCE # 483981 Date: SYSTEMS SUPPORT MANAGER: / - 217e2422::, SALES REPRESENTATIVE: .z1Ge7vi (Branch Manager) ACCEPTANCE We, The City of Hermosa Beach, do hereby accept this proposal in its entirety, with no changes other than those stated prior to acceptance, in the "Comment Section". This proposal and the signing of acceptance shall forgo and become binding above any and all other forms or contracts. COMPANY NAME: DATE: BY: TITLE:-. Page 3 �f 3 BID BREAKDOWN Item # 1 Screen: Exhibit B 4 of 6 1 each Projection Screen 25' x 15' Stewart Electricscreen Mdl w/ Ultramatte 200 AS Spec'ed $9,478.66 1 lot Installation of above screen to include special screen masking and placement $2,750.00 Item # 2 Projection System: "CI, 2 each Eiki EX4000P Xenon Projectors...$6,700.00 ea '$13,400.00 '�' 2 each Eiki #6512 Change Over for above$ 912.50 ea $ 1,825.00 2 each Eiki 25mm Lens $ 112.50 ea $ 225.00 2 each Eiki 38mm*Lens $ 112.50 ea $ 225.00 2 each Eiki 50mm Lens $ 50.00 ea $ 100.00 2 each Eiki Zoom Conversion Lens $ 112.50 ea $ 225.00 2 each ATA Shipping Cases w/ Casters, two handles, and extra compartment for power supply....$ 546.66 ea $ 1,093.32___ 5 each Eiki Vision 2000' Take -Up Reel, Plastic w/ -- Easy Rewind Feature $ 25.00 ea $ 125.00• 1 each DAVSC Splicer/Viewer $ 240.62 2 each DAVSC Rewinds$ 60.81 ea $ 121.62 4 each Eiki AX10301 Spare Lamps/4000P..$ 420.00 ea $ 1,680.00 2 each Eiki F02 -603U Fuses $.90 ea $ 1.80 2 each Eiki F15-6030 Fuses $ .90 ea $ 1.80 2 each Eiki 241-12821 Motor Belt $ 18.25 ea $ 36.50 2 each Eiki 320-13151 Supply Arm Belt.'.$ 19.80 ea $ 39.60 2 each Eiki 241-14321 Take -Up Belt$ 30.47 ea $ 60.94 2 each Eiki 241-14052 Rewind Belt $ 33.86 ea $ 67.72 2 each Eiki 260-15211 Drive Belt$ 36.45 ea $ 72.90 2 each Eiki 241-12191 Motor Rewind Belt$ 22.87 ea $ 45.74 12 cans Compressed air w/nozzle • $ 6.00 ea $ 72.00 2 each Custom Made Projection Stands...$ 417.00 ea $ 834.00 1 lot Installation/Hook-Up/Audio Line Level $ 556.00 (Installation is for 2 ea. projectors w/ accessory equipment, Audio Line Level, and Carts) Total of Equipment $29,972.22 6.5% Sales Tax 1,948.19 Total Installation 3,306.00 Freight 270.00 Total Complete $35,496.41 **The above does not include permits, bonds,city license's or Electrical ( except as required per attached proposal). *** If you would perfer the Metal 2000' Reels instead you would use part # DAVSC 2000' Metal Take-up Reel at 12.50 each totaling $62.50, plus sales tax. BID BREAKDOWN Exhibit B :6 6 1. Projection Screen 25' x 15' Stewart Electriscreen Model "C" w/ Ultramatte 200 AS APEC'ED 9478.66 Installation of above screen to include special screen masking and placement 2750.00 2. EX4000P Eiki Xenon Projectors 6700.00 ea. #6512 Eiki Change over for above 912.50 ea. 25mm Lens 112.50 ea. 38mm Lens 112.50 ea. 50mm Lens 50.00 ea. Zoom (200mm) Lens 112.50 ea. ATA Case w/ casters, 2 handles, extra compartment546.66 ea. Eiki Vision 2000' Take -Up Reel Plastic w/ Easy Rewind 25.00 ea. OR DAVSC 2000' Metal Take -Up Reel 12.50 ea. DAVSC Splicer/Viewer 240.62 ea. DAVSC Rewinds 60.81 ea. Eiki AX10301 Spare Lamps for EX4000P420.00 ea. F02 -6030U Fuses 1.80 ea. F15-6030 Fuses 1.80 ea. 241-12821 Motor Belt 18.25 ea. 320-13151 Supply Arm Belt 19.80 ea. 241-14321 Take -Up Belt 30.47 ea. 241-14052 Rewind Belt 33.86 ea. 260-15211 Drive Belt 36.45 ea. 241-12191 Motor Rewind Belt 22.87 ea. Compressed air / nozzle NO BID ( this can be purchased local by you) Custom Projection Stands/AS SPEC'ED.... 417.00 ea. Audio Line Level/Installation/Hook-UP.. 556.00 ea. **Installation for above includes both Projectors. *The Above does not include any sales tax, permits, bonds, city license's, or Electrical (except as required per attached proposal). Exhibit B 6 of 6 AUDIO GRAPHIC SYSTEMS References California Institute of Technology 391 South Holliston Pasadena, California 91125 Gordon Ellingsen (818) 356-6092 Hedley Builders NBI Reg. Headquarters 46 Corporate Parkway Irvine, California 92714 Tony (714) 851-2211 - Latter Day Saints Church 12784 Rexton Street Norwalk, California 90650 Mr. Swanson (213) 865-0577 Told Construction 853 Via Alondra Camarillo, California 93010 Dennis Hern (805) 987-2244 Norman H. Gonzales Contruction 692.4 Canby Ave. #117 Reseda, California 91335 Armand Gonzales (818) 341-0580 October 26, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 ACCEPT INSPECTION/ADMINISTRATION SERVICES AS COMPLETE AND FINAL PROJECT ACCOUNTING FOR BEACH DRIVE - STORM DRAIN/ SANITARY SEWER/STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CIP 87-302 Recommendations: It is recommended that City Council: 1. accept as complete inspection services provided by BSI Consultants; 2. appropriate an additional $30,679 from the Sewer Fund fund balance to CIP 87-302, and; 3. return $2,633 to the State Gas Tax Fund. Background: January 12, 1988: Council awarded a contract to Colich & Sons in an amount not to exceed $302,397 for construction of a new storm drain, new sewer line and new pavement on Beach Drive between 6th Street and 10th Street. January 26, 1988: Council awarded an agreement to BSI Consultants in an amount not to exceed $24,745 for inspection and administration services of Beach Drive improvements. October 25, 1988: Council accepted the construction as complete. Analysis: This section is divided as follows: 1. Inspection and Administration A. Built According to Plans and Specifications B. Construction Records C. Final Project Costs 2. Final Inspection Costs 3. Fiscal Impact and Final Project Accounting Inspection and Administration A. Built According to Plans and Specifications The project has been built according to the plans and specifications prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers and approved by Council. BSI Consultants has inspected the project for compliance with the design and has provided written Certification of Compliance. 1 B. Construction Records BSI Consultants has provided daily inspection reports for the construction project. BSI Consultants also provided record drawings of the actual sanitary sewer, storm drain and sewer improvements. C. Final Project Costs BSI Consultants has reviewed the final construction costs for this project and confirmed the amounts shown in the following section under "Construction" and "Inspection". 2. Final Inspection Costs Below is a summary of inspection costs for BSI Consultants: Original contract amount not -to -exceed: Final Contract amount Balance $24,745 17,687 $ 7,058 3. Fiscal Impact and Final Project Accounting Below is a summary of final project separated into design, construction and inspection and divided and divided by fiscal year and by the funding source: DESIGN Total State Gas Tax Fund Sewer Fund FY 86-87 $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- FY 87-88 5,869 2,404 3,465 FY 88-89 -0- -0- -0- Total $ 5,869 $ 2,404 $ 3,465 CONSTRUCTION FY 86-87 $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- FY 87-88 232,466 53,136 179,330 FY 88-89 61,742 20,513 41,229 Total $294,208 $73,649 $220,559 INSPECTION FY 86-87 -0- -0- -0- FY 87-88 14,149 3,820 10,329 FY 88-89 3,538 958 2,580 Total 17,687 4,778 12,909 GRAND TOTAL $317,764 $80,831 $236,933 2 -'v r SUMMARY Amount % of Total Contract Design $5,869 1.8 Construction 294,208 92.7 Inspection 17,303 5.5 Total $317,380 100.0 ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS REQUIRED FOR FISCAL YEAR 88-89 Total State Gas Tax Fund Sewer Fund Design SO SO SO Construction 61,742 20,513 41,229 Inspection 3,154 854 2,300 Total Costs FY 88-89 64,896 21,367 43,529 Budgeted FY 88-89 36,850 24,000 12,850 Additional Appropriation Required $28,046 Estimated Fund Balance through 9/30/88 New Fund Balance * ($2,633) $30,679 $26,087 $35,781 $28,720 $5,102 Alternative: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Do not accept the'inspection of this project as complete. Respectfully submitted: Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: JKevin'B. Northcraft City Manager bdsds pw/clerk Concur: Antony Antich Director of Pu lie Works Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copeland Finance Administrator November 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 9, 1988 ANNUAL HOLIDAY WAIVER OF COMMERCIAL PARKING METER ENFORCEMENT Recommendation: That the City Council again authorize the silver posted meters in the downtown area be bagged for the month of December, and au- thorize the use of City streets for the holiday kick off on De- cember 1. Analysis: Attached is the annual request for free parking in the downtown commercial areas during the holiday season. While the letter refers to meters in the VPD district, it has been our practice to bag silver meters in the broader downtown commercial area. One thousand bags will be supplied by the Chamber for this activity. Please also note that the annual lighting ceremonies will be held December 1 at 7:00 p.m. City Manager KBN/ld cc: Public Works Director Public Safety Director lk HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 October 25, 1988 Mayor Jim Rosenberger and City Council Members City Hall/Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Council: The Christmas season is fast approaching and the Chamber of Commerce is planning an event to make this a most enjoyable Holiday season. First, we request that all silver posted meters in the VPD district be bagged from December 1, until January 1, 1989. We also request that three hour free parking be allowed. This year, we are planning to have our annual Christmas mixer and lighting ceremonies together as one event. On thursday, Dec. 1 from 5:30 until 8:00 pm the festivities will kick-off at the Bank of America. The outside ceremonies will start at 7:00 pm and consist of an opening prayer, caroling and the official lighting ceremonies. We are hoping the Mayor will be available on that evening to officially LIGHT UP THE CITY FOR THE HOLIDAY SEASON!! We will need permission from the City Council to close the north side of Pier ave, from Hermosa Ave. to Beach Dr.,on that date between the hours of 7:00 and 8:00 pm. We will also need enough barricades to block off both ends of Pier Ave. We look forward to your favorable consideration of the above plan. ly yours, illiam C. Fowler Executive Vice President cc: Tony Antich Joan Noon F IMMIMP 30 North Raymond Avenue Suite 708 Pasadena, Calif. 91103-3930 James P. Lough Attorney at Law October 31, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM Telephone (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Resolution Number 88- , Amending Resolution Numbers 86-4932 and 87-5056 Regarding Residential Encroachment Permit Liability Insurance Requirement and Approving an Updated City of Hermosa Beach Encroachment Permit Endorsement Procedure Recommended Action: To approve the attached resolution amending residential encroachment permit insurance requirements. Background: Since 1986, the city has enforced an encroachment permit program which requires insurance coverage of persons encroaching upon city property. Over the past two years, the program has been amended several times to reflect changes in liability coverage. One such change was to allow commercial tenants to obtain encroachment permits and insurance rather than the landowner. Recently, some problems have arisen regarding insurance requirements for residential properties. Two landowners who have had existing permits with the city have been unable to obtain new coverage which names the city as an additional insured under their insurance policies. The reason given by the insurance companies is that the city does not have an insurable interest and that the property owner would be the only one liable in case of accident or injury. Analysis: With this inability to obtain insurance with the city named as an additional insured, these property owners face the problem of not being able to complete any work or maintenance on their encroachments because the permit would not be obtained without said coverage. Another problem is that until a land- owner with an existing encroachment obtains the proper coverage, the city's interest in the property will be uninsured anyway and the landowner will probably let the policy lapse and no insur- ance coverage of the encroaching area will be in existence. While city ordinances give the discretion on insurance coverage to the city attorney, the resolutions that were adopted to implement that somewhat limit any authority by staff to meet 31/SR1109A -1- 1n i REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Resolution Number 88- , Amending Resolution Numbers 86-4932 and 87-5056 Regarding Residential Encroachment Permit Liability Insurance Requirement and Approving an Updated City of Hermosa Beach Encroachment Permit Endorsement Procedure these problems. For this reason, the city council at its last meeting suggested that a more flexible system be adopted so that property owners who cannot gain insurance coverage could be allowed to obtain or renew their encroachment permit subject to certain conditions: 1. That the landowner assume all liability for any injury or accident which occurs; and 2. That the owner assume all liability for maintenance of the encroaching area. This problem arose when landowners came forward to volunteer that they did not have insurance coverage. The fact that two landowners have had this problem raises a question as to whether some of the current insurance endorsements we have have actually been approved by the companies in question, rather than just the agent. Leaving the system the way it is could encourage fraud in having people sign endorsements that really have no coverage for the city behind them. It is for these reasons that this change is recommended. JPL/gp NOTED: Respectfully b fitted, �j AMES P. LOUGH, City Attoey Y OF HERMOSA BEACH KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT, City Manager 31/SR1109A -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBERS 86-4932 AND 87-5056; AS AMENDED, REGARDING THE RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENT AND APPROVING AN UPDATED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ENDORSEMENT PROCEDURE. WHEREAS, residents of Hermosa Beach desiring a Residential Encroachment Permit have not been successful in securing the required $500,000 liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured when such insurance can be obtained; WHEREAS, wording in the current City of Hermosa Beach Encroachment Permit Endorsement needs to be updated and deleted; WHEREAS, wording in the current regulatory scheme needs to be updated to meet the changing market conditions for necessary insurance coverage; WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach Encroachment Permit Endorsement is used for Residential, Commercial and Commercial Outdoor Dining Encroachment Permit Agreements and it is recommended that endorsement forms be created for all encroachment permits. N'OW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Section 4 shall hereby be added to Resolution Number 86-4932 to read as follows: /// /// /// /// 31/RES010B -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 4. Upon review by the City Attorney of Encroachment Permit Requests, the require- ments of Section 4 shall be met by the resi- dential LANDOWNER to provide insurance in the minimum amount of $500,000.00 (combined single limit coverage), covering against any injury, death, loss or damage arising out of the encroachment. Said OWNER shall sign a form, approved by the City Attorney, which indicates that the residential LANDOWNER has met these conditions. SECTION 2. Section 5 shall hereby be added to Resolution Number 86-4932 to read as follows: SECTION 5. After consultation with the Public Works Director, the City Attorney, on behalf of the CITY, may require additional insurance amounts of coverage for any encroachment where the nature of the encroachment potentially exposes the CITY to greater liability than could be covered by the normal policy limits established. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and shall make an entry of the /7/ /// /7/ /// /7/ 31/RES010B -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PPROVED AS 20 -FORM: TY ATTORNEY 31/RESO10B -3- PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY REQUIREMENTS By this agreement, the undersigned property owner certifies that he/she has obtained insurance coverage satisfactory to the City. The property owner agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect policies of insurance which cover said encroachment subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. The undersigned property owner shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers and employees against any and all claims which result from the existence of any encroachment existing as the result of the use of the encroachment granted by the City. This hold harmless assumption shall include all costs of investigation and defense. Further, the property owner agrees to accept all responsibility for maintaining said encroachment. 2. The policies maintained by the property owner shall provide the designated limits of liability combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage arising out of the encroachment as follows: Residential $500,000.00. 3. The policies maintained by the property owner shall not be cancelled except by notice to the City Attorney of the City of Hermosa Beach at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of such cancellation. Attached to Policy No. of the Date: Expiration Date: Property Owner Name, Address & Telephone: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 31/EPIIR2b t Mayor and Members of the City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES November 1, 1988 City Council Meeting November 9, 1988 The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: William Webb/ Browning Ferris - 241 -33rd Street -Filed October 12, 1988 - alleged sewer damage. Thomas Nichols - 1931 Graham Redondo Beach - Filed October 24, 1988 - alleged wrongful death. Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator. Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. KA HLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk Concur: EVIN B. OR4ICRAFT, City Manager 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Helen Low 1931 Graham Redondo Beach, CA 90278 (213) 374-6293 In Propria Persona In the Matter of the Claim of: HELEN LOW; ROGER WHITE, ) CATHERINE JUNE WHITE, ) ) Claimants, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH; ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ) ) Respondents. ) ) \\---;\ \ �44.L ; f -i ✓ r''y c, 1 988 ye, n ''4 4. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 910 TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Helen Low, Roger White and Catherine.June White, whose address is 1931 Graham, Redondo Beach, California 90278 and claim damages from the County of Los Angeles and the City of Hermosa Beach in the amount computed as of the date of the presentation of the claim of $2,000,000.00. This claim is based upon the wrongful death of Thomas Nichols, decedent, on July 27, 1988, while in Hermosa Beach at the Hermosa Beach Pier. Claimants sustained their -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 injuries and damages under the following circumstances: 1. Public employees of both jurisdictions came to the aid of Mr. Nichols, the decedent, on the beach adjacent to the Hermosa Beach Pier undertaking to rescue him but were negligent in doing so resulting in his death. The exact nature of the causes of the decedent's death are currently unknown. 2. The names of the public employees responsible for the claimants' damages under the circumstances described are not known to the claimants at this time. The damages sustained by the heirs of the decedent as far as known as of the presentation of this claim consist of those damages resulting from the wrongful death of their son and brother, Thomas Nichols. The amount of this claim as of the date of the presentation, is computed as follows: 1. General damages for the wrongful death of Thomas Nichols in the sum of $2,000,000.00. 2. Medical and burial expenses unknown. All notices or other communications with regard to this claim should be sent to the claimants in care of Helen Low at her address of 1931 Graham, Redondo Beach, California 90278. Dated: -6- (::::?C/r/V;) 304j HELEN LOW In Propria Persona CITY OF ATTENTION: ADDRESS: LIABILITY CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY HERMOSA BEACH City Clerk 1315 V - Si. - . - . . • 2. 3. 4. 10000 touts D4 tai 20000 'Tire Department 30000 '.Public Works/Pi 50000 .Administration 60000 Miscellaneous 90000 immoral Sery COPIES T0: 95. 1(jp,,• d ��,4 .x,91 CLAIMS FOR DEATH INJURY TO PERSON, OR TO PERSONAL PROPERTY, MU LATER THAN 180 DAYS AFTER THE OCCURRENCE (GOV. CODE, SEC. 911 CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES TO REAL PROPERTY MUST BE FILED NOT LATE OCCURRENCE (GOV. CODE, SEC. 911.2). , 4 1. y D NO1 READ ENTIRE CLAIM FORM BEFORE EKING. ACH EPAR • E SHEETS, IF NECESSARY TO GIVE F L DETA s - if71%/ ma OCT —`vA 21988 City Clerk /�+ 1 Clty or Hermoae .each V NAME OF CLAIMANT: ///i!am jA4'Lbb AGE: HOME ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT (STREET, CITY AND STATE)q/ 3,) BER: 1+Qrmo5& &ea9',2y TELEPHONE NU ISINESS ADDRESSflJEET CITY AND STATE) %�J� Lit67ni��,e (- KCnv r PV4z--74-1 TELEPHONsBER. � GIVE ADDRESS TO WHICH YOU DESIRE NOTICES OR COMMUNICATIONS TO BE SENT REGARDING T CLAIM: �/ a `�l) C/rn SeiIJ-IIS �/Yl t d &1)1�j - a/ `L C%.�1�cy wri_e if 75 DATE OF ACCIDENT: (.irniA,/ h\H' e)f'--1)`If -e, TIME: • F Olt z � c, TcF_A)74--- HOW I'LACE OF ACCIDENT (BE SPECIFIC) CK G�33 `r.5 DID DAMAGE OR INJURY OCCUR? (BE SPECIFIC) 14/1) # .4,% 11 /%I /, .moi .I.0 I A / ' /.. -0,:e"14 td1114..NMEMPITgaZaliMMIIMBriMINfflifira ,ar D' U,"1Tll- �' -�i�r/j2� Aw'1y'-! WERE P LIC'AT SCENE? ES NO . a ea* NAME OF CITY EMPLOYEE CAUSING THE INJURY OR DAMAGE, IF KNOWN GIVE TOTA DAMAGE). AMOUNT OF CLAI INCLUD I , ' I'; . Do STIMATE AMOUNT OF `lk5 I n NY PROSPECTIVE INJURY OR f is sfi 14) HOW WAS AMOUNT OF CLAIM COMPUTED? (BE SPECIFIC. LIST D • TO ES !MATES, EIC.). PLEASE A TACH TWO ESTIMATES: CC V 1 A 14 id/ k _ ' .1)' I ' 13 'CV. • : I WAG,E RATE, RE PA iil 0 id '&' Wi NDITURE DE ON ACCOUNT ACCIDENT 0 INJUR DATE AND TEM • /_ / i !.��/ . ��r�"►II /l 0 -Airy . r1'V ' % 2 VAME�AND ADDRESS. WI NESSES, DOCTO'S AND HOSPITALS: /v 0(1 D(' . If_AU" 0. .. 2 . t ?LEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY: For all accident claims, place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South and We: indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City Vehicle when you first saw it, and b "B" location of yourself or you vehicle when you first sow City Vehicle; location of City vehicle at time o, accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle by the time of the accident by "B-1" and the point of impact by "X". NOTE: IF DIAGRAMS BELOW DO NOT FIT THE SITUATION, ATTACH HERETO A PROPER DIAGRAM SIGNED BY CLAIMANT. For Automobile Accidents 7A\ // For Other Accidents Na 1 HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT 1 SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREBY STATE UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS I BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. CERTIFY (OR DECLARE) UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CCRREC1 DATED: Oc+ 5"I q Ca (SIGNED): Note: Presentation of o false claim is a felony (CAL. PEN. CODE 72). di/444 6F -T2 November 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of November f, 1988 REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION TO FUND CONTRACT PLANNER FOR MULTI USE CORRIDOR STUDY AND GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate S19,200 from the General Fund, Prospective Expenditures, Account No. 001-401- 1214-4322, to Planning Department, Contract Services, Account No. 001-401-4101-4201. Background: At the City Council Meeting of August 23, 1988, the City Council instructed staff to proceed with developing a plan of action for study of the Multi -Use Corridor. On October 11, 1988, the Planning Department recommended that an in-house contract planner be recruited to prepare the General Plan update and complete the study of the Multi -Use Corridor. Analysis: Article III, Section 2-24, of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, exempts "persons engaged under contract to supply expert, profes- sional or technical services for a definite period of time" from Civil Service requirements. It is proposed that this position will be for a two year period and will be an independent contrac- tor. The terms of the contract will include that the individual will work a minimum of forty -hours per week on the assigned project. Recruitment for an "in-house" contract planner can be completed by November 25, 1988. Following selection, it is anticipated that the individual could commence employment by the end of December. It is proposed that this position be budgeted for a salary range of $2,800 - S3,200 per month. The final negotiated salary will be dependent upon the individuals qualifications. The existing Associate Planner's salary range is S2,352 - S3,073 (plus health and retirement benefits). The requested appropriation will fund this position through this fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted for fiscal impact: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Admin. Cop , Concur: elan Finance p November 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 9, 1988 APPROVAL OF THREE YEAR PLAN TO PROVIDE HOLIDAY DECORATIONS IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council commit to sharing the financial burden equally with the Chamber of Commerce of a three year lease/purchase of $15,000 in holiday decorations. Analysis: - As noted in the attached letter, the City and Chamber jointly provided holiday decorations under a three year lease/purchase. This program proved beneficial, and the Chamber Board is now ask- ing the Council to continue the program for an additional three year lease/purchase at the same cost of $2,500 per year. This amount is currently authorized in our approved budget. The new acquisition will allow an extension of decorations in several new areas of the City. Since this is the first of a three year commitment, it is appropriate that the Council approve this plan and authorize the payment of $2,500 for FY 88-89. City Manager KBN/ld cc: Chamber of Commerce HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 October 25, 1988 Mayor Jim Rosenberger and City Council Members City Hall/Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Council: The Chamber, at a recent Board meeting, voted to purchase additional Christmas decorations for the City of Hermosa Beach. In 1983 the City and the Chamber joined together to purchase new decorations on a lease/purchase of $15,000.00 on a three year contract. Once again, we ask the Council to join with the Chamber in completing what we started in 1983. With this new acquistion, we could complete the downtown area, all of Pier Ave., and Pacific Coast Hwy. We are able to obtain the same decorations we purchased in 1983 so the entire city will have the same look and appeal. We ask that the City Council vote a three year lease/purchase with the comittment to the Chamber of $2500.00 per year starting December 1, 1988. The Chamber will match these funds for the same period, thereby, completing the purchase of $15,000.00 worth of decorations. We sincerely hope that the City will look with favor on this project, as it would add to the holiday spirit of people visiting and shopping in our city. I will be in attendance at the Council meeting if any questions should arise. S William C. Fowler Executive Vice -President MMMIMM Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: November 1, 1988 Regular Meeting of November 9, 1988 APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION MERGE LOTS - GROUP LM 88-8 LOCATION/ 039 HILLCREST DRIVE OWNER '''12.,E0 AND ELIZABETH BUNCH 1922 HILLCREST DRIVE DINO VLACHOS 619 8TH PLACE DEBORAH REGAN Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council deny the concur with the decision of the Planning Commission subject lots. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of October merged the subject lots. Analysis Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt properties from being subject to merger. Additional background and analysis is provided in Planning Commission staff report of October 4, 1988. Attachments 1. P.C. staff report of 10/4/88 2. P.C. minutes of 10/4/88 3. Letter of appeal 4. Background a. Notices of Intent b. Tax Assessor's maps c. Aerials Michael Schuba-Th Planning Dire tor evib B'. NorthcraIft City Manager 1 TO appeals and to merge the 4, 1988, the subject the attached Respec-tul lyn,SuTmitted, Andr Associate Planner J Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: LOT MERGER HEARING September 28, 1988 Regular Meeting of October 4, 1988 ADDRESS / LEGAL DESCRIPTION / OWNER / ASSESSOR'S NO.: 1) 2032 Prospect Ave - Lot 84 and 85 except the westerly portion thereof, Walter Ransom Co's Redondo Home Tract - Katherine Pilon Hamilton - 4184005013 2016 Prospect Ave Redondo Home Tract - 2010 Prospect Ave Redondo Home Tract - - Lot 120 and 121, Walter Ransom- Co's Albert and Jean Wilhelm - 4184006012 - Lot 122 and 123, Walter Ransom Co's Alexander Steele - 4184006013 1836 Hillcrest - Lots 14 and 15, Walter Ransom Co's Redondo Home Tract - John and Sherree Riley - 4184008015 1026 21st Street - Lot 4184009001 1, 2, and 3, Tract 1965 - Joan Brown 1922 Hillcrest - Lot 21 and 22, Tract 1965 - Dino 4184009012 Vlachos 2039 Hillcrest - Lots 41 and 42, Tract 1965 - Leo and Elizabeth Bunch - 4184010004 1919 Hillcrest - Lots 52, 53 and 54, Tract 1965, Charles Coleman - 4184010010 a) 2208 Borden Street - S' 15' Lot 26, Lot 27, and N'2' Lots 28, 29, and 30, Tract 2143 - Rick Thompson - 4184014011 b) 2218 Borden Street - Lot 25, 5' 20' Lot 24, and N' 10' Lot 26, Tract 2143 - Rick Thompson - 4184014010 c) 2306 Borden Street - Lots 22, 23 and N' 5' Lot 24, Tract 2143 - Rick Thompson -4184014009 10) 733 24th Place - Lots 8 and 9, Block 3, Montmarie Tract Louis Mathews - 4184016005 11) 631 24th Street - Lots 49 and 50, Block 2, Hermosa View Tract - Saundra Kreeswirth - 4184019017 12) 740 24th Street - lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1, Montemarie Tract - Barbara Adams - 4184021005 '13) a) 554 2nd Street - Lot 7 and W 10' of Lot 8, Tract 256 - Berta Gomez- 4188021009 2 b) 552 2nd Street - Lot 9 and E' 15' of Lot 8, Tract 256 - Berta Gomez - 4188021010 14) 425 Ardmore - Lot 61 and Lot 62 Except W' 30', Tract Maria and Elias Del Rio - 4188024007 15) 325 Ardmore - Lot 51 and lot 52, Tract 451 - Robert - 4188026019 16) 655 8th Street Hermosa Tract - 17) 619 8th Place Second Additio -4187028022 451 - Catalano - Lots 9 and 10, Block C, Second Addition To Mary Funk - 4187028020 - Lot 14 and E' 36.61' of Lot 15, Block C, n to Hermosa Beach Tract - Deborah Regan 18) 640 8th Street - Lot 23 and lot 25, Block B, Redondo Hermosa Villa Tract - Betty Brown - 4187029033 Recommendation To approve Street. a merger for all the subject properties except 640 8th Background Lot Merger Group 88-8 - Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on August 4, 1988 - Number of Notices of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 160 - Number of requests for hearing received - 18 The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in L.M. 88-8 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Analysis 2032 Prospect Ave The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel area is 4730 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structures straddles the property line. Building records indicate this to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 55% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger (General Plan Designation - Low Density, Zoning - R-1). 2016 Prospect Ave The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel size is 5100 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the t` property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 257 of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation -Low Density, Zoning -R-1) 2010 P?" pect Ave The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel size is 5475 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 25% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation- Low Density, Zoning- R-1) 1836 Hillcrest The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel size is approximately 3400 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 36% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Low Density, Zoning - R-1) 1026 21st Street The parcel is comprised of three lots; total parcel size is 6370 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles all three lots. Building records indicate this parcel to contain two units. Staff has determined that no lot, contained in this block has been developed seperately. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Low Density - Zoning R-1) Note: Staff received a letter from Joan Brown requesting the Planning Commission merge this parcel into two parcels. Ms. Brown states that this site would provide each parcel with a 40' frontage. However, the parcel does not have enough land to provide each parcel with the minimum standard of 4000 sq. ft. 1922 Hillcrest The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel size is 4000 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 36% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation- Low Density- Zoning R-1) — ci-— c c 2039 Hillcrest The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel size is 4000 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 36% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation- Low Density- Zoning R-1) 1919 Hillcrest The parcel is comprised of three lots; total parcel size is 6000 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 36% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation- Low Density - Zoning R-1) 2208 Borden The parcel is comprised of one and a half lots; total parcel size is 4224 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that no residential lots have been developed seperately. The lots located on the west side of Borden are commercial. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Low Density- Zoning R-1) 2218 Borden The parcel is comprised of one lot and two adjacent half lots; total parcel size is 4125 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that no residential lots have been developed seperately. The lots located on the west side of Borden are commercial. Staff cannot determine any reasons exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation- Low Density- Zoning R-1) 2306 Borden The parcel is comprised of two full lots and a small portion of a third; total parcel size is 4125 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that no residential lots have been developed seperately. The lots located on the west side of Borden are commercial. Staff cannot determine any reasons exempt this parcel 5 from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation- Low Density- Zoning R-1) 733 24th Place The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel size is 5413 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 12% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - General Commercial- Zoning- R-1) 631 24th Street The parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel size is 5406 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that only 12% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation- Low Density- Zoning- R-1) 740 24th Street The parcel is comprised of three lots; total parcel size is 8109 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal four unit site. Staff has determined that only 247 of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. However, since the total parcel size is 8109 square feet, a lot line adjustment would allow for two parcels, each with a minium of 4000 square feet. (General Plan Designation- Low Density- Zoning- R-1) 554 2nd Street This parcel is comprised of one lot and ten feet of an adjacent lot; total parcel size is 3500 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a single family dwelling. Staff has determined that 56% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. 554 2nd Street and the adjacent parcel, 552 2nd Street have the same owner. (General Plan Designation - Low Density; Zoning - R-1) 552 2nd Street This parcel is comprised of one lot and 15' of an adjacent lot; total parcel size is 4000 sq. ft. Aerial indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a single family dwelling. Staff has determined C C that 5670 of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Low Density; Zoning - R-1) 425 Ardmore Avenue This parcel is comprised of two lots except the westerly 30' thereof; total parcel area is 6420 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this parcel to be a single family dwelling. Staff has determined that 4370 of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Low Density; Zoning - R-1) 325 Ardmore Avenue This parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel area is 4539 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this parcel to be a nonconforming commercial use. Staff has determined that 507 of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since this parcel meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Low Density, Zoning - R-1) 655 8th Place This parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel area is 5016 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this parcel to be a legal single family residence. Staff has determined that 38% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since this parcel meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Medium Density, Zoning - R-2) 619 8th Place This parcel is comprised of two lots; total parcel area is 5016 sq. ft. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this parcel to be a single family residence . Staff has determined that 3870 of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt this parcel from merger since this parcel meets all standards for merger. (General Plan Designation - Medium Density, Zoning - R-2) 640 8th Place The Planing Department has received a survey from the property owner indicating the main structure does not straddle the property line. The survey indicates that the main structure is 0.6' from the property line. Therefore, this property is exempt from lot merger. If any separation of the lots for the purposes - 7 - of development, sale, or financing is proposed, elimination of the required parking is still prohibited or must be provided on site for each lot. Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments: 1. Request for hearings 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Tax Assessor Maps 4. Aerials g Alex ernandez Assistant Planner a/pcsrlm HEARING OF DETERMINATION FOR LOT MERGER GROUP 88-8 Comm. Edwards asked how many lots have been merged to date. Mr. Schubach stated that approximately 1,000 lots have been merged into 500 lots. Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated September 28, 1988. Each parcel was discussed individually in order to avoid confusion. Chmn. Peirce stated that in order for parcels not to be merged, one of the four following criteria must be met: (1) the structure does not straddle the property line; (2) the property is not owned by one person; (3) that 80% or more of the block is developed; or (4) the lots are not substandard in size. Hearing opened by Chmn. Peirce. 12039 Hillcrest Drive The parcel is comprised of two lots with a total parcel size of 4000 square feet. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be a legal single-family residence. Staff has determined that only 36% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. The parcel is located in the R-1 zone, with a general plan designation of low density. Elizabeth Bunch, 2039 Hillcrest, opposed the merger of her lots based on the fact that her property value would be substantially reduced. She has lived there for 30 years. She stated that in her neighborhood, 80% o_ f the existing houses have already been developed as one house to one lot. She stated that only she and one other neighbor have homes straddling the property line. She said she is nestled among 20 two-story houses, each on one lot. She was informed by the Planning Department that "neighborhoods don't count; only blocks." Ms. Bunch questioned whether the lot mergers have been appropriately advertised. Ms. Bunch questioned the definition of a "block." She stated that Hillcrest Drive goes all the way from 21st Street to 16th Street with no intersecting lines; whereas Prospect and Rhodes to the east and west have 19th Street and 20th Street intersecting them. She continued by discussing the layout of the streets in this area. Ms. Bunch presented photographs depicting her house and the neighborhood. Mr. Schubach stated that the code contains a precise definition of "block," particularly in regard to lot mergers. Comm. Edwards noted the importance of people gathering solid evidence to present to the Commission during the public hearings in order to substantiate their claims. Comm. Rue hoped that the City Council would take into consideration cases such as this one where a small house is totally surrounded by larger developments. He noted the importance of accepting the reality of a situation, rather than merely following definitions. P.C. Minutes 10/4/88 Chmn. Peirce did not feel that the issue of a definition of "block" is applicable case, noting that this is an unbroken block. MOTION by Comm. Edwards, seconded by Chmn. Peirce, to recommendation to merge the parcels at 2039 Hillcrest Drive. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Peirce None None None in this approve staff's 1922 Hillcrest This parcel is comprised of two lots with a total parcel size of 4000 square feet. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this lot to be legal single-family residence. Staff has determined that only 36% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. The parcel is located in the R-1 zone, with a general plan designation of low density. Dino Vlachos, 17911 Shambly Circle, Huntington Beach, owner of 1922 Hillcrest, opposed the merger of his lots based on the fact that the main reason he purchased the property 25 years ago was that it was a double lot. He stated that if the City merges his lots, his only recourse is to file a lawsuit. He felt that merging would substantially reduce his property value. He stated that his property is unique, in that it is on the top of a hill. He felt this action is arbitrary and capricious. MOTION by Comm. Edwards, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to approve staff's recommendation to merge the parcels at 1922 Hillcrest Avenue. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Peirce None None None 619 8th Place This parcel is comprised of two lots for a total lot size of 5016 square feet. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this parcel to be a single-family residence. Staff has determined that 38% of the individual lots have been developed. Staff cannot determine any reason to exempt this parcel from merger since the site meets all standards for merger. The parcel is located in the R-2 zone, with a general plan designation of medium density. Deborah Regan, 619 8th Place, addressed the Commission and stated that she was unprepared to address this issue at this time. She opposed the merger based on the fact that her property value will be adversely affected. Ms. Regan discussed the other properties located in this area. She stated that the area is becoming all multiple dwellings. She urged the Commission to not merge her lots. Ms. Regan felt that the City should attempt to make properties conform once the old structures have been torn down; not while there are still houses on the property. She also noted concern over her property taxes should the parcels be merged. P.C. Minutes 10/4/88 Comm. Edwards stated that this particular property meets all of the criteria for merging. MOTION by Comm. Edwards, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to approve staff's recommendation to merge the parcels at 619 8th Place. AYES: Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None P.C. Minutes 10/4/88 - Il- October 5, 1988 Hermosa Beach City Council City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION I wish to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission on October 4, 1988 to merge my lots 41 and 42, Tract 1965. I request that you schedule this after October 25, 1988 since I will be out of town until then. Elizabeth Bunch 2039 Hillcrest Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 DiD• �lach no oa ATTORNEY AT LAW anntiniloxmp&.culis. Park 16052 Beach ppBou/eiw , c uite ,67 16 t7iuRtixyton Reach, California 92647 614) 8484817 TO: HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL FROM: DINO VLACHOS DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1988 SUBJECT: MERGER OF LOTS 21 and 22; Tract 1965; AP#4184009012 ,„..- Her„ r4.i y c h NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT DINO AND HELEN VLACHOS, OWNERS OF THE ABOVE -CAPTIONED REAL PROPERTY, REQUEST A HEARING BEFORE THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL TO APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO MERGE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LOTS. 0/14 619 Eighth Place Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 October 5, 1988 City Council Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Gentlemen/Gentlewomen: RECHiltb OCT 1 11988i- City 1988► City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach Please schedule me on your agenda. I wish to appeal the decision of the City Council and Planning Commission to merge my lots made on Tuesday October 4, 1988 against my wishes. I was informed at that time that I should make my request to you for a hearing within 10 days of October 4, 1988 and am so doing. :*(See end of letter.) As in all cases of disagreement, it is best when both parties inform each other of rules and agenda. Accordingly I would like you to address the following: 1. Why was I not notified in writing at my address of the City Council's resolutions regarding lot mergers especially since those actions directly affected my property? 2. Why didn't the Planning Commission letter (my first notification of merger activity) include specifics as to the exact criteria that applied to my lot, what was appropri $e action to be taken to support or oppose the merger, and the merger process itself from inception of the criteria through the appeal process? 3. How do I receive compensation for the financial loss you have just inflicted upon me? 4. What have you enacted regarding the 6 unit apartment immediately to the east of my property? 5. What are the procedures regarding my property taxes? 6. Please supply a list of the mergers. 7. What is the percentage improvement in the Hermosa Beach density/popu— lation directly caused by these lot mergers? If any of these items can be answered by mail or by my picking them up ahead of time, I would appreciate your contacting me. I work 23 miles from Hermosa Beach, leaving home at 6:15 and returning at 5:30 and am glad to come in if our hours match. My work number is (213) 942-4079. I would like to also mention at this time just to relieve my feelings that I was very disgusted by the proceedings on October 5 for two reasons: (1) Ground rules were stated up front as 3 minutes per speaker (OK) but then were largely ignored during the agenda prior to the lot mergers, most notably with the young man defending the Loma issue (not the surveyor), but enforced during the merger part of the evening. and (2) The merger issue is making people who are not (yet) undergoing demolition/construction activity conform to current zoning/philospphy and placing a financial or inheritance loss on those people while the other issues heard that evening allowed people to ignore current zoning/philosophy with no financial loss. Specific items included the set back on 5th Street which may meet current zoning setbacks but ignores the low density feeling of the street and cer— tainly has a large enough lot for a larger setback, the 1 parking space and yet you espouse parking on site rather than on street, and Loma which was to be denied and which violates zoning/setbacks. One must ask why can this development match the older structures on the street yet my lots cannot stay as they were? Sincerel 0_"- Deborah S. Regan I was also told that the lot merger would NOT be recorded within 120 days of August 4, 1988, that the issue remains open and as 2 lots until resolution, i Eachgroutta WHEN RECORDED r RN TO: l , City of Hermosa beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 _- NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends'to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4184010004 Property Owner: LEO BUNCH AND ELIZABETH BUNCH 2039 HILLCREST DR HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Legal Description: LOT 41 AND 42 TRACT 1965 A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY Andrew ere Associate PMnner STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) DATE August 4, 1988 On this 4th day of August, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew •Perea, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIA'. SEAL Kathleen L. Reviczky NUT✓UBLIC CALIFo NlA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 1988 v L (FREE RECORDING IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) -16-- .v. •.-f viw "e.K M- '��'R ..IIM!'♦3ni�K1 �YF/W'. t.`.1 p4.4,4•1614LfS+7"A iv.1; WHEN RECORDEDTRN TO: City of Hermosa _.ach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4184009012 Property Owner: CONSTANTINO VLACHOS AND HELEN VLACHOS 17911 SHAMLEY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 Legal Description: LOT 21 AND 22 TRACT 1965 A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of •the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY Andrew Perea Associate Pld ner DATE August 4, 1988 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 4th day of August, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a notary .public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew Perea, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me Asa OF ICIAL SEAL Kathleen L. Reviczky Beach executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARr PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 1988 SEAL (FREE RECORDING NG IS REQS STED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) WHEN RECORDED R1( N TO: City of Hermosa ach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 418702E022 Property Owner: DEBORAH REGAN 619 8TH PLACE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Legal Description: LOT 14 AND E' 36.61 OF LOT 15 BLOCK C SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT A--Not4 ce of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY And dew--P-erea Associate P1 ner STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) DATE August 4, 1988 On this 4th day of August, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county -and state, personally appeared Andrew Perea, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me th Beach executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIA'.. SEAL Kathleen L. Reviczky NOTA.,••URINE . Al Io.'t�r N�.. LOS ANGELES X00141 g My Commission Expires Sept. 16. 1988 SEAL (FREE RECORDING IS REQU'STED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) 6I 0 W N_ 0 — O 6 - UI or PROSPECT %EST 25 35 SS • 3 6 • : 52 54 ,o 2 .3 7 ZS •ol 217(0°' 0 5 q,34 25 6 lz! /; .7 25 ,z000e 32 0 ' •-1 31 25 610 q • ') 'kJ „ , • e0' CD 9 30 l0 z.00°1 !2,63 29 63e. .11 po° 20 28 ,5 ZS •••• 80e 1.e 60 I 5'5 CD 12 131 J4 1 26 0 2a ;1J, 25 115 1-/7 25 0. 3,01' 0 1 6 24 23 3"0 25 AVE. 0 19 25 '44 ,4:/ 55 HI LLCREST c) TRACT N. 1q10,5 2.1-S,0 1-4tsi-4 9 I" 30 W W 0 0 30 rQ 9TH N Sr. O 1• 50.76 I so O yl 0 o :1 ,v76-,34 5/84 I So •• I SO I 70 I I i O i O 0 61 LOTI 78 0 Pop -. .50 I 70 45 • ti 0 c 22 4S •• 0 23 . • o o 0 24 - 45O 26 Q. POR. /O 0 m 25 27 O R. 4S • v. o l 28 . // POR.e //o Jo 62 24 ,,:, 17�� 3740 '1 36.6r.kill: I Z3 O pz 16 3296 6 - s- .. Z/ O 13 rApo d 12 .. II ...• , A% e Fa - 80000000 8 K. 7 C 6 .. 5 ,. 4 .. .. 3 .. 33 2 33 23 1 POR. 23 f P 8TH t-p1S PLACE 0 SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH • M. B. 3-11-12 REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT TRACT 'NO. 223 NA R. 7-151 M. B. 13-193 01 90 Z so /off 1 E J ✓ Iry ra r� . _Y.1a• n'.s 11'i+ww ..a+fy '��py ♦ ,may .�..aY�.. `.r ] "a N • irrITTreltirrt Ftlig 'G r/4r'f}•h! i Ma. • f 3 -• 4cr • ' •••st • !'lk.;_-.30.:4 • - • ••• .‘!•••;,.;:j;r: 411 •At1-3 4;1,1' 4., ..-••••,•;-,• E9'4z '' Yaw • a • -C - -71ett. ‘..• t....4 , 1 , .., ...... , ,. r ,......, ....,............•.....•...... ' ' ry":"•• • 7: , • , -1,11,1`4F " •i• " • !' • ••••"„g -`1141:e•::. ?rreVrilirTZgli • tamuila 1 • t ••.11.11, o1/4 .. 1 (If :i..4: , 't..,.... r•:.4 s ' :*1 ' ' -•• ... 1 P.04.- - Sr.441.;1 . c 14 •rtri'AIL,'•••• 4.-*s*.4:. ^4,.° ,•Artta4,,:,4*. •".....4-4.,tiilf•%..•• -",f.;'., r" .e.;,.:5--, ''4 •-• 1 . .. 'vg''•f• •,1" '1V-1,147::,-'..7 i: ;4„,iT:•• • •t,:,1:3L10-•• • U. 448121015sui 4! ••!-Iitrefrove 1.3.; '§0604, 03 • 4'4-7 , • twn • ?Ye:Y:1 z• 13").f.m•-•;•TO,-;42:4V'cl.,• • • •- • • \ ;,:1•41: et.01 ',=INqlek.4441,‘ 'Lite . . , t --144i;.=1 .:474-7-t • ••• • • ..;• . . , i-"ja•••••A'-'•''' ' .-. -! .. .. ... .: .. Nrillrerlen. •• ''''),RV7'1:7"Pr,,e11(4.4'''W ".••4,"- ,.. , .......... ' "r9i.' re•lltr - .7:, r-..`-: 40,...tik "•-41/44,- :, --' -.' ' November 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 88-4 -- REZONE AREA 2D FROM R-2 TO R -1A LOCATION: REFER TO ATTACHED MAP INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation The Planning Commission and Staff recommend rezoning the subject area from R-2 to R -1A. Background The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing of September 20, 1988 and recommended to the City Council that this area be rezoned from R-2 to R -1A. Abstract Rezoning the area will result in consistency with the General Plan. Analysis Analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of September 20, 1988. Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinance with maps 2. P.C. Resolution 88-83 3. P.C. Staff Report of 9/20/88 4. P.C. minutes of 9/20/88 5. Affidavit of Public Notice 6. Public Correspondence CONCUR 1 l /// t Michaelt Schubac Plan ing Director,ii^ • /Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager a/ccsrzone 1 Resctful bmitted, Andrew Pere Associate P ! nner s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on November 9, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. State law requires consistency between the zoning and General Plan; B. Rezoning of area 2D from R-2 to R1 -A will result in maintaining low density and bring the zoning into consistency; C. The majority of the lots in area 2D are large enough to allow for two units under the proposed zone change; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: Section 1. Rezone area 2D from R-2 to R -1A, legally described as follows: - Lots 1, 2, 4-7 inclusive and 10-12 inclusive of Block 1 of Hermosa Park Tract. - Lots 5-7 inclusive of Block 2 of Hermosa Terrace Annex. Lot 1 of Tract #33436. - Lot 1 of Tract #31684. - Lot 1 of Tract #14277. - Lots 1-14 inclusive of C.C. Hunt's Addition to Hermosa Terrace Tract. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of November, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED Ad FORM 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 T/ccrszon2 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY J.I .• . -t • BLKI = •• i 12 11 10 F • \ s t 0 { L. ._co) SO •' S0- AREA 2D REZONE FROM R-2 TO R -1A /6 /5 0f3 2 10 : s i 1 t 1 \\ 7 i� e�t \ s t 0 { L. 3 ':" h'•''' "'. '' Via:. _• ti .,f�. 1 _. uiJi 02 aa., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND RECOMMENDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. State law requires consistency between the zoning and General Plan; B. Rezoning of area 2D from R-2 to R1 -A will result in maintaining the density status quo and bring the zoning into consistency; C. The majority of the lots in area 2D are large enough to allow for two units under the proposed zone change; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Rezone area 2D from R-2 to R -1A, legally described as follows: - Lots 1, 2, 4-7 inclusive and 10-12 inclusive of Block 1 of Hermosa Park Tract. - Lots 5-7 inclusive of Block 2 of Hermosa Terrace Annex. - Lot 1 of Tract #33436. - Lot 1 of Tract #31684. - Lot 1 of Tract #14277. - Lots 1-14 inclusive of C.C. Hunt's Addition to Hermosa Terrace Tract. S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONTINUED -- Resolution P.C. 88-83 VOTE: AYES: Comms.Edwards,Ingell,Chmn.Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms.Ketz,Rue CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-83 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commissionof the City, of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of September 20, 1988. > 7 -- Jam O Peirce, hairman Michael Schubach, Secretary 4 bvT$ Date T/perszon2 6 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission September 13, 1988 Regular Meeting of September 20, 1988 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 88-4 -- REZONE AREA 2D FROM R-2 TO R -1A LOCATION: REFER TO ATTACHED MAP INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends rezoning the subject property from R-2 to R -1A. Background The Planning Commission and City Council originally studied this sub -area with Area 2. Since neither R-1 nor R-2 zones were appropriate for this sub -area, a new zone classification, R -1A, was created. According to the City Council's adopted schedule, the subject area should be considered for rezoning at this time. Analysis Changing the zoning to R -1A would result in consistency with the General Plan and would be in compliance with proposition E.E. The new zoning classification, R -1A, was created to allow parcels larger than 6700 square feet to have two units. This zoning classification is consistent with low density General Plan standard since Low Density allows a maximum of one unit per 3350 square feet of land. Analysis of this sub -area indicates that most of these parcels are large enough for two units under the proposed R -1A zone. Almost half of these parcels are large enough to allow four (4) units under current R-2 standards. Therefore, the recommended zone change will reduce densities by approximately 50%. STATISTICAL DATA Total Land Area: 213,740 sq. ft. Total No. of Lots: 30 Current No. of Dwelling Units: 52 Average No. of Units per Lot: 1.73 Existing Density: 10.61 units per Acre 7 Existing Zoning: R-2 General Plan Designation: LD - Low Density Potential No. of Units under Current R-2 Zoning Ordinance (1,750 sq. ft. per Unit): 110 Potential No. of Units under Proposed R -1A Zone Change (1 Unit per Lot by Ordinance): 57 No. of Lots with Nonconforming Units under Current R-2 Zoning: No. of Units Constructed in the Last 10 Years: 0 6 No. of Units Constructed 10 to 20 Years Ago: 5 No. of Units Constructed 20 to 30 Years Ago: 20 No. of Units over 30 Years: 21 Historical Factor: a. 1930 Land Use Map: R-2 b. 1943 Land Use Map: c. 1956 Zoning Map: d. 1978 Zoning Map: Lot Size Breakdown: a. No. of Lots over 6,700 sq. ft.: R-2 R-2 R-2 27 b. No. of Lots under 6,700 sq. ft.: 3 r4\ if An erea Michael chu ch Planning Director T/pcsrzon2 s Associate Pla ner f REZONE OF AREA 2D FROM R-2 TO R -1A OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated September 13, 1988. The Planning Commission and the City Council originally studied this sub -area with Area 2. Since neither R-1 nor R-2 zones were appropriate for this sub -area, a new zone classification, R -1A, was created. According to the City Council's adopted schedule, the subject area should be considered for rezoning at this time. Changing the zoning to R -1A would result in consistency with the general plan and would be in compliance with Proposition EE. P.C. Minutes 9/20/88 The new zoning classification, R-1 A, was created to allow parcels larger than 6700 square feet to have two units. This zoning classification is consistent with low density general plan standards, since low density allows a maximum of one unit per 3350 square feet of land. Analysis of this sub -area indicates that most of these parcels are large enough for two units under the proposed R-1 A zone. Almost half of these parcels are large enough to allow four units under current R-2 standards. Therefore, the recommended zone change will reduce density by approximately 50%. Area 2 contains 213,740 square feet, with a total of 30 lots. There are currently 52 dwelling units with an average number of 1.73 units per lot. The existing density is 10.61 units per acre. The existing zoning is R-2, with a general plan designation of low density. The potential number of units under the current R-2 zoning ordinance is 110; the potential number of units under the proposed R -1A zone change would be 57. There are no lots with nonconforming units under the current R-2 zoning. Six of the units were built within the last ten years. Five units were built 10 to 20 years ago. Twenty units were built 20 to 30 years ago, and 21 units are over 30 years old. The land use maps of 1930, 1943, 1956, and 1978 were all R-2. There are 27 lots over 6700 square feet, and 3 lots are under 6700 square feet. Mr. Schubach recommended that the Planning Commission recommend that Area 2 be rezoned from R-2 to R-1 A. Public Hearing opened at 7:58 P.M. by Chmn. Peirce. Seeing no citizens coming forward to testify, the Public Hearing was closed at 7:58 P.M. by Chmn. Peirce. MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Edwards, to approve staff's recommendation, Resolution P.C. 88-83. Mr. Lough explained that, since this action would be a recommendation to the City Council, a majority vote would be necessary, not a unanimous vote of the Planning Commission. Chmn. Peirce stated that he would tend to favor leaving this area R-1. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Edwards, explained that R -1A is a currently existing zone in the City. He continued by explaining the differences between R-1 A and R-2. He stated that staff is recommending the zone change in order to make this area conform with the surrounding areas. AYES: Comms. Edwards, IngelI, Chmn. Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms. Ketz, Rue to — P.C. Minutes 9/20/88 (SEAL) I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the 2-ftL day of Qcl BGS , 19gg deposit into the United States post:office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of com= petent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I -have executed this declaration on this the ZSR day of • 06T�oz , 198y at IIerrnosa Beach, California. A,t,L p ' t Sf(t- V/4' 7/Na (name) (Snatti (Capacity) State 'of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS On this the 252' day of enc -The -P-44...) , 198P, before me,_ jt04 , the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared �' ��??gg rN proved to me on the basis of satisfac'Eory 4vidence to be the person(s) whose name) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that %Sin executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL KATHLEEN L. MIDSTOKKE • NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES C0UNr1L Expires SEPT, 29,, 1992 Notary Public 7)10.NLAA. _4 LJJ L 4c-io 23t -Lec. z_k (3.Q_ c•Ifkit.o.,.:„Q rNi_cJ( 5—(e SEP 1 igg8 November 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council Nobember 9, 1988 SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT, EXTENSION AND PROPOSED REVISION TO MULTI -USE CORRIDOR INTERIM ORDINANCE INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends that the interim ordinance be extended for 21 months and that boundaries of the area subject to the interim ordinance be modified to eliminate certain areas. Background At the October 11, 1988 meeting, the City Council adopted 45 day interim ordinance for all residential and commercial development in the entire Multi -Use Corridor. Analysis According to State law the City must provide a status report prior to the end of the 45 day expiration period noting what has been accomplished. Staff has made field observations, and determined that certain portions of the Multi -Use Corridor should not be included in the moratorium based on the following criteria: 1) Age of residential and/or commercial development, 2) topography, 3) maintenance of development, 4) ownership, and 5) Depth of current commercial development. Also the likelihood of development, and if there was some doubt about near future development, was also considered. Using the above factors to provide a realistic approach in determining what areas need to be studied to improve the commercial corridor and maintain the integrity of the abutting neighborhoods, the staff has eliminated a large portion of the Multi -Use Corridor north of Pier Avenue. The attached map shows those areas which are included in the proposed revised interim ordinance. Although some portions of the Multi -Use Corridor to the south of Pier Avenue could also be eliminated, staff believes it should remain under the moratorium because of the confusing boundary which would be created otherwise. It should be noted that a large portion of the southern area is already commercially zoned and in commercial use, whereas in the north it is residentially zoned and in residential use. CONCU:: evin B. Northc'aft City Manager Michael'Schubach Planning Director 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR STRUCTURES IN THE MULTI -USE CORRIDOR FOR TWENTY-ONE (21) MONTHS. WHEREAS, the Multi -Use Corridor was designed to allow for a mix of commercial and residential uses; WHEREAS, allowing residences in the Multi -Use Corridor area will restrict future opportunities for commercial development along the Commercial Corridor of Pacific Coast Highway; WHEREAS, the mixing of such uses, commercial and residential, blurs the distinctions between commercial and residential neigh- borhoods which create problems associated with commercial devel- opment spilling into residential neighborhoods; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it desires a study of this situation and a recommendation by the Planning Commission on what steps are necessary to take to ensure the integrity of residential neighborhoods while maintaining a secure commercial base; ,WHEREAS, the City Council finds that construction in the Multi -Use Corridor, during the period of the study, would defeat the purpose of the study. WHEREAS, the size of area involved requires a significant amount of lead time to study and, therefore, an extension of moratorium is necessary to preserve the status quo and protect the future environment of the area during the period of study; // 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. No building permits shall be issued for projects which meet the following criteria: Any construction projects in that portion of the area commonly known as the Multi -Use Corridor, which is shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and described as follows: 1. South City limits to Eighth Street, east and west sides of Pacific Coast Highway, all area designated Multi -Use Corridor. 2. West of the following addresses extending to Pacific Coast Highway: 823 Fourteenth Street 830 Fifteenth Street 825 Fifteenth Street 832 Fifteenth Place Sixteenth Street Raymond Avenue 829 Seventeenth Street 826 Eighteenth Street 821 Eighteenth Street 1851 Rhodes Street 1843 Rhodes Street 1835 Rhodes Street 824 Nineteenth Street 821 Nineteenth Street 824 Twentieth Street 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 821 Twentieth Street 826 Twenty-first Street 3. West of the following lots and/or streets: a. Rear of lots fronting on Raymond Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway. b. Borden Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway. 4. East of the following addresses extending to Pacific Coast Highway: a. Lot 25, Block 1, Hermosa View Tract. b. Easterly seventeen (17) feet of Lot 44, Block 1, Hermosa View Tract. 5. The South Bay Hospital Property locatd at portion of Lot 18 and 19, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. (a) Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to October 11, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans, and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. (b) Subsection (a) also includes the projects located at 845 and 835 - 15th Street (845 - 15th Street having had a Conditional Use Permit approved on August 23, 1988). (c) This ordinance shall not apply to minor additions/alterations to residential structures that do not add units or where the C-- ,,twain -thousand dollars 029-:-8-08-&e-) as valuation does not o, cicA (2,56 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 r ';gr.778/UrZ.jC20Zoned Commercial: C-1 standards Zoned Residential: R-1 standards. (e) In case destruction by fire or other asstroph v S d7Q� vm of natural cata`�� the roperty owner shal be allowed to rebuild to for ommercially oned pr perty or to R-1 standards for residentially zoned property including density. // Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of /0 ----CC months from today's date unless extended pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65858. Section 4. The City Council shall draft a report for presentation to the public at its second meeting in January, 1989. Such report shall state what steps are being taken by the City to correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps are planned to be taken in the future to remedy the situation. Section 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED ASS TO FORM: / 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTOREY PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 5 EXHIBIT A AREAS OF MULTI -USE CORRIDOR INCLUDED IN INTERIM ORDINANCE East of the following: 654 8th Street 653 7th Street I NINTH {AJ 2.3 w . ST NINTH Oa w q EIGHTH PLACE N • 7O 1 N EISMTH Lot 14, Dr. Dougherty's_ SEVENTH ST Hermosa Bay View Tract 665 6th Street 666 6th Street 683 5th Street 702 5th Street 673 4th Street 702 4th Street 707 3rd Street 702 3rd Street 705 2nd Street 708 2nd Street 705 1st Place N SIXTH Q�1 �0 4, '�n AS1 N � S n N OATH T f Zjl114 (";:iml.4 Loi .r' w L 5i FOURTH 'a N S W Ow w W IS Y N:L West of the following: a N ST ST a N m C 847 7th Street 850 7th Street 839 6th Street Garvey Court a 837 5th Street Lot 124,Walter Ran- som Co.'s Venable Place Lot 140,Walter Ran- som Co.'s Venable Pla 710 1st Street • Staff proposed MUC moratorium boundary Ocean View Avenue 906 3rd Street 849 2nd Street Lot 40, Home Builder's Place Lot 44, Trafton Heights Tract 848 1st Street "m' Alternative--- Eliminates all R-1 zoned property except small portion on Second Street //' a EXHIBIT A AREAS OF MULTI -USE CORRIDOR INCLUDED IN INTERIM ORDINANCE East of the following: err rouxr' Easterly 17' of Lot 44,. Block 1, Hermosa View "'r Tract • Lot 25, Block 1, Hermosa View Tract s .LACE • fibel West of following: 11 ---Borden Avenue 1828 Springfield Ave. 1830 Springfield Ave. 1902 Springfield Ave. 1910 Springfield Ave. 1920 Springfield Ave. (So. Bay Hospital District Property) 826 21st Street -821 20th Street I : -824 20th Street Sr 821 19th Street 824 19th Street 821 18th Street 826 18th Street T----829 17th Street N tP Sr .-Rear -of Raymond Ave. • lots//60/ 6-Y Ramond Avenue 832 16th Street 902 150 Place Street 900 15th Street 903 14th Street S,rTEEN►N sr SI CP ▪ - 901 15th AYE. ou. Sr ELEKNrN It. N TENTN 21 a S A r EN TN �Ari0N Honorable Mayor and Members of October 24, 1988 Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 RESOLUTIONS TO IMPROVE SIGHT DISTANCES ON VALLEY DRIVE AT 25TH STREET, 24TH STREET AND 24TH PLACE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 88- , establishing a "No Parking" Zone (red curb) along the west side of Valley Drive from 150 feet north of 25th Street to 50 feet south of 24th Street. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 88- , establishing a "No Parking" zone (red curb) for 50 feet west of 25th Street, 24th Street, and 24th Place on both the north and south side of the street. Backround: A resident of the 400 block of 25th Street, wrote to the City on September 11, 1988, (copy attached), with a concern he and his neighbors have at the intersection of 25th Street and Valley Drive. The curve in Valley Drive plus the steep grade and angle that 25th street makes with Valley Drive added to the poor sight distance due to vehicles parked along the curb all contribute to their concern. Ed Ruzak & Associates (licensed traffic engineer) was asked to act as City Traffic Engineer, study the situation and to prepare a report of his findings. A copy of that report is attached. A copy of this agenda item was delivered to the affected adjacent properties. Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: a) Scope of Study b) Recognized Standards c) Resident's Suggested Solution d) Recommended Solution to Improve Sight Distance e) Loss of Available Parking f) Fiscal Impact a. Scope of Study The City Traffic Engineer expanded the scope of the study area to include 24th Street and 24th Place. These cross street intersections with Valley Drive also require drivers to merge into Valley Drive at points where sight distance is limited. 1 11 b. Recognized Standards Caltrans has recognized standards (applicable to City of Hermosa Beach streets) for "stopping sight distance" and "intersection sight distance". These two terms respectively relate to the sight lines that drivers on Valley Drive need to have in order to stop if they see an emerging side street vehicle, and the sight distance necessary for the emerging vehicle to safely enter the Valley Drive traffic stream. When vehicles are parked along Valley Drive, the sight distances are well below the acceptable minimum requirements. Thus, it is very difficult for vehicles from the cross streets to enter Valley Drive. Fortunately, the reported accident picture does not indicate a high concentration of right angle type accidents at either of the three intersections studied. 'Nonetheless, the potential for accident is heightened with the lack of available sight distance. c. Resident's Suggested Solution One of the potential mitigation measures suggested by the resident making the request, is to provide an all way stop at 25th Street. The recognized state warrants for such a stop are not met. In addition, the traffic engineer believes that there would be potential for rear -end type accidents at 25th Street if this mitigation were implemented due to the restricted sight lines along Valley Drive due to the roadway curvature. d. Recommended Solution To Improve Sight Distance The solution that has been recommended is to remove sufficient curb parking on the west side to provide the minimum sight distance at each location. In addition, the west side of Valley Drive would be restriped to provide a "shadow lane" approximately five to seven feet from the west curb. This would enable the cross street emerging vehicles to move to a position farther out into Valley Drive to see approaching traffic. The emerging vehicles would in effect be shadowed or protected from the north/south traffic. This shadow lane would have cross hatched striping and not be a through lane. It will assist drivers turning right into the cross streets. They would have an opportunity to "get out of the line of through traffic". e. Loss of Available Parking The loss of available parking is as follows: Valley Drive: 25th Street: 24th Street: 24th Place: Total f. Fiscal Impact 20 4 4 0 spaces spaces spaces spaces 28 spaces Minimal, because all work can be done with City forces within formerly budgeted amounts. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff available to City Council are: 1. Do nothing; thereby, not eliminating a potential liability. Respectfully submitted, / Ant'7'y Antich Director of Public Works Concur:. -Kevin B. Northpraft City Manager Attachment: Letter from Mr. Rod Merl dated September 11, 1988 Resolution No. 88 - Resolution No. 88- pw/clerk vdcss 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2 2 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. NS 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A NO PARKING ZONE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF VALLEY DRIVE AS HEREIN SET FORTH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. NS 2435, as amended shall be and is hereby further amended by adding the following subsection to Section 4, No Parking Zone. Section 4.147 VALLEY DRIVE: West side only, from 150 feet north of 25th Street to 50 feet south of 24th Street. SECTION 2. That this amendment shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of November, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: PPROVED AS M: , CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. NS 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A NO PARKING RESTRICTION FIFTY FEET WEST OF VALLEY DRIVE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH PLACE, 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET, AS HEREIN SET FORTH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. NS 2435, as amended shall be and is further amended by adding the following subsection to Section 5, No Parking Zone. Section 4.133 25th Street: North and south side of 25th Street 50 feet west of Valley Drive. Section 5.136a 24th Place: North and south side of 24th Place 50 feet west of Valley Drive. Section 5.137 24th Street: North and south side of 24th Street 50 feet west of Valley Drive. SECTION 2. That this amendment shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of November 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK PPROVED A(S TOO FM: 28 VALLEY DRIVE FX/5T//vG RFU CURL? Jima P/zaPOS�I0 NO PARKING '1 TO: Anthony Antich,Director of Public Works October 25,1988 FROM: Ed Ruzak SUBJECT: Valley Drive Sight Distance Problems at 24th Street, 25th Street and 24th Plac_F This lett{3r type report reflects the analysis findings and recommendations of a study of the subject locations. The study was initiated from a request by a private Hermosa Beach citizen that was concerned with the sight line problems at 8'5th Street. The study was e::panded to look at the adjacent companion inter -erections. In brief, the sight distance for emerging vehicles from Valley Drive cross streets is less than standard and poses a safety problem for the users on both streets. It is recommended that curb par -king he removed and Z shadow lane created to allow vehicles better- sight distance when emerging from the cross streets. . SPEED AND SIGHT DISTANCE CONDITIONS The posted speed limit on Valley Drive between Gould Camel, and 24th Place is 35 mph. The 25th percentile speed .is '32 mph. Thi s means that 85X of the vehicle along Valley Drive are traveling at or below 36 mph. Caltrans ?i9l:t distance requirements for 35 and 40 mph are as follows: Sto".apiria Sight Distance 35mph250' 40rr,p h= 800' Corner sight Distance 35mph = 335' 40mph= 440 Stopping sight distance relates to the distance that Valley Drive traffic must see in order to react to an object in the roadway and bring the vehicle to r' stop in order to avoid striking the object. Corner sigh: distance is the distance a driver emerging from the crass street needs in order to accelerate into the Valley Drive traffic stream. 1. California Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual, Section 400- and Topic 201. Field measureemente and measurements taken from 1"-4O'scale plans indicate that for the southbound direction approaching 25th Street 24th Place- and 24th Street t ther-e is less than 200 feet of sight line available. This assumes the fact that curb parking. is available. Without curb park:ino the sight lines improve to a distance that exceeds the Caltrans requirements. Corner sight distance at 25th street is less than 100 feet when curb parkin e is present. This figure is slightly higher at =4th Place (120') and 24th Street ( 125') , This is due to the short sections of red curb along Valley Drive and the presence of driveways proximate to the side street. Swed surveys taken along Valley Drive in 1982 indicate that traffic is traveling at a level that is above the posted speed distance available, hcwisver, is less than the The sight y standard for either the posted limit or the 84th percentile speed. ACCIDENT HISTORY A two year review of reported accidents at the three intersectionintersectione showed a very good record. Two right angle accidents were reported at etth Street, none at 24th Place and one at 24th Street. MITIGATION CONSIDERATIONS Multi-Wav Stops Consideration was given to the installation of a three way Step condition at the 25th Street/Valley Drive intersection. Caltrens Traffic Manual provides recognized warrants for the installation of multi -way stops. Comparison of the traffic volumes along Valley Drive and 2tth Street showed that theree was insufficient volume to warrant the stop controls, Likewise, the accident history did not meet the criteria in the warrants. The manual is clear that multi -way stops should not be considered where the volume of traffic on the two streets involved are not approximately equal. In this case the side street traffic volume is considerably less than Valley Drive. The curvilinear alignment of Valley Drive north of 25th street exacerbates the sight line conditions. With curb parking, a vehicle emerging from 25th Street cannot see in excess of the required Caltrans eight distance. Thus, Valley Drive traffic that would be required to stop at ESth Street if three way stops were installed would risk being rear ended by southbound vehicles that would not be able to see the stopped car backed up vehicles from the stop. Curb P-rkina Removal Curb parking removal from a point north of 25th Street near the Rotary end Kiwanis activities to south of 24th Street would bring. the sight distance levels up to the recommended standards., The spacing of driveways between the three study' cross street: indicates that a piecemeal attempt at removing a few spaces e5 would not provide the required standards. A total of 20 parking spaces would. be lost to the users on Valley Drive. Curb parking removal would also be needed for a distance of at least fifty feet on each of the cross streets. This removal would be taken from both sides of the street. Four (4) spaces would be taken on 25th Street, four spaces on 24th Street and none on 24th Place. Thus, a total of 28 spaces would be removed from Valley Drive and/or the side streets. These streets are 24 and 2s feet wide. Two cars could park on the corner on both sides and there would only be 9 feet of clearance. A vehicle turning into the cross streets from Valley Drive is in a position to collide with the legally parked vehicles if this condition continues. The existing curb parking at the corners leaves only nine feet. available for two way traffic. Twelve, eleven and ten foot one way traffic lanes are acceptable. The rine foot width is clearly -less than desirable engineering guidelines. This condition is a major concern relative to the safe operation of traffic on these streets. It could be mitigated by the curb parking removals. The curb narking usage is very high when the Kiwanis and the Rotarians have large events. Their parking Lots off street are too small and curb parking is utilized exclusively. If curb parking is removed, the curb area on the west side of Valley could be striped as a cross hatched "shadow lase". Theis lane would allow vehicles from Valley Drive to turn into 'their cross streets from the curb area and avoid the potential for being rear ended as they decelerate to enter the cross street. More importantly perhaps is that the emerging vehicles from the side streets would be able to move to a position much closer to where they could see traffic along Valley drive. They would have to traverse less of a distance to merge into the Valley Drive traffic streae. Thus, safety for all the users would be enhanced. RECOMMENDATIONS In the interest of promoting safety for all the users at the three stuck intersections. the following are recommended: 1. Remove curb parking from the west side of Valley Drive from a point 150 feet north of 25th Street to a point 50 feet south of 24th street. This is the minimum distance along Valley Drive that parking can be removed in order to provide the maximum sight distance for the cross street' Results in a loss of '(-) spaces 2' Remove curb parking from the north and south sides of a5th Street. 24th Place and 24th Street for a distance of 50 feet westerly. Results in a total loss of 8 spaces' 3. Restripe Valley Drive with a cross/ hatched "shadow -lane" of approximately 5 to 7 feet in width. 4 September 11, 1988 Mayor and City Coucil City of Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach,.CA.'90254 Dear Mayor and City Council, P SSP 13 \yy� �,,tVj nig' "11‘s..` I believe it necessary to write you concerning a serious potential safety hazard that exist due to the peculiar alignment.bf 25th Street and Valley Drive. In the five years I have lived on 25th I have witnessed- and myself experienced - all too many near accidents at that intersection. 25th Street doe:: not intersect. Valley at a the normal right angle, instead. it joins at an acute angle which requires cars turning onto it from Valley to make an unusally sharp right turn. Parking is permitted on both sides of 25th as well as the west side of Valley. 25th is a narrow :trete': and it also c:zops away as one turn; onto it from Valley. Traffic on Valley generally is going at least at the speed limit of 35, and is cluite frankly "hostile" to cars slowing for the turn onto 25th. - That turn onto 25th has toe taken particularly slow since all too ofter as you come around that corner there are car�: parked on hcth s:.des and you are facie to face t, th a car trying to get onto Valley and or pecp'.e walking in the steet (there are no sidewalks)with kids or dogs. IL is not an easy situation - an(this is the circumf,tance when the driver knows the situation. It is mutil worse with the unfam.ilar ones who do nut realise the extreme right turn they have to make nor the narrowness of the street. They take it to fc.:'t and ttirn too wide. I have experienced this situation when:.I have tried to walk with my kids to the RR right of way and we have had to •play "dodge car': I car. assure you it is truly scary seeing these: cars: come around the corner just about out of control. it is also no jun when coming home from work with people nearly running into you while your f. ryir:g to turn or. you: - own street. The aboue:situations are only half the problem. Perhaps the most clearly hazardous problem is that in addition to the problems noted, Valley north of the 25th intersection curves aware. This curvature makes it difficult to see on coming traffic when turning left onto Valley from 25th. When cars are parked up to the corner it in fact is impossible. I recommend all of you attempt the left turn, particularly on a weekend when the Rotary or Kiwanis buildings are being used and the street is parked up (for some reasons vans and trucks seem to take a liking to the area near the corner- and cars on 25th are parked right up to the intersection as well). It is under these circumstances that She can really appreciate the odd angle of the street, the arc of 2.et14 the impact of parking, and the speed of cars on Valley. Turning becomes a calculated risk or you have to pull so far into the street that you do interfear with the traffic. Even a right turn onto Valley can be a problem because you‘to little view of southbound traffic, the really fast cars can be on you very quickly as you pull around. This it problem is why so often when youare turning right onto 25th from Valley you are confronted with a vehicle parked in the middle of the street trying to get onto Valley. There are two possible solutions to this problem, but only one is realistic. First, parking could be elimenated from the west side of Valley noth of 25th for several hundred feet and on both or one side of 25th from the corner for some distance. In view of the parking problems I do not beieve this will happen nor would I recommend it. The other answer is to put a full three way stop at the intersection. Let me hasten to note I am not an advocate of stops signs as thesolution to every problem. I would not like to see a replication of the excessive stops on Propect between 190th and Aviation. I do think in this situation it is fully justified by the serious safety problem and the fact that this inter- section is a unique anomaly on Valley. Two stops between.27th street and Pier Avenue is not excessive. Quite frankly, the ancillary effect of braking the speed on this stretch of Valley is needed. The city has a responsibility to deal with this dangerous situation. It should consider that it is on notice of its liability. I..request that you act on this matter expediously, before near misses become something worse. cerely Rod Merl 485 25th !Street Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254 November 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AGENDA ITEM 1M AVIATION BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SAFETY REVIEW On November 2, 1988 a petition regarding the intersection at Aviation Boulevard and Ocean Drive was hand delivered to the Public Works Department. This petition contained 464 signatures on 20 pages expressing concerns regarding what the petitioners feel is a potentially hazardous condition at the intersection referenced above. The first page, only, of that petition has been copied and is attached. The entire petition is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Noted: (ot evin B. Northcft City Manager Attachment (1) :mv sup pwadmin 1 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORM "`.Tirro �m We, the undersigned, are seriously concerned about the life threatening situation on the corner of Avation Blvd. at Ocean Dr. in Hermosa Beach. It's a inter_e._tion to both driver and pedestrian regardless of the drection tree. are travel l in:J . fee the obvious answer to our safety in this situation is something to re::uiate or slow down the _speeding traffic, such as a signal or stop si.gn. Let's take care of this danyerpus situation before it becomes a tragedy,• not after. m1/4/1 eate44i oke -L -N ivv,-) 4„,(J, 010 7-3)6 9-771_ Ote-7 5- k5"-TIVZ-A,404/-)SCP---- RECEIVED NOV 219 GOY N, 43 1 16 h6 UBLIC DEZT5 a) 2-77 ISS S- INAA-2,1- et 0-2:7 b / oSelrho nf- re god- Lf/S /l /grocacu y 7t6A i, 13 9 0Z-77 7a n h ,81 j, m. B. 9c& A. 13. �jc t 6$ nth c_ /�z 2 Oc-6r. 17/6 tet. a2 l J 7/7/Z; An -6 // i' % j 9 ,F? b o,7,5 //zz- 7, /7(tvii71.-4-4 Gi / ,124W- coca/me/4.2A_ q z(- J6f Sr He q0z- / o e*Lit2;td `71 .5 ,f-se° -% 9', .ccf0h 4_ October 31, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 9, 1988 AVIATION BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SAFETY REVIEW Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 88- , prohibiting left turns out of Aubrey Court onto Aviation Boulevard. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 88- , establishing a red zone on Aviation Boulevard in the vicinity of Owosso Avenue and Ocean Drive for the provision of improving sight distances at the crosswalks. Background: A traffic engineering study of Aviation Boulevard from the easterly City limits to Pacific Coast Highway was prepared and is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk. Analysis: This report was prepared by Ed Ruzak & Associates, Inc. (licensed traffic engineer) at the request of the Director of Public Works responding to public concerns of safety on this street. The report considered the following: 1. Stopping Sight Distance 2. Crosswalk Utilization 3. Traffic Signal Considerations 4. Flashing Beacon Considerations 5. Additional Signing/Pavement Marking 6. Re -striping Aviation 7. Other Improvements, i.e. Turning Prohibitions The recommendations are summarized as follows: 1. Provide "PED XING" pavement markings on both lanes in advance of the approaches to the Ocean Drive painted crosswalk. Provide pedestrian crossing signs adjacent to the marked crosswalk from both approach directions. Place "Pedestrians" signs west of Prospect Avenue for westbound traffic and east of Pacific Coast Highway for eastbound traffic to alert motorists of the potential for pedestrians in the area. Director's Comment: This work has been completed. In addition, all painted crosswalks and "PED XING" stenciling have been refreshed. 1 m 2. Survey the businesses and property owners in the vicinity of the Owosso Avenue crosswalk regarding the need of a painted crosswalk. Director's Comment: This survey will be conducted. 3. Prohibit left turn out of Aubrey Court onto Aviation Blvd. Director's Comment: Since construction of the Travelodge, there has been an increase in the number of left turn accidents. A resolution has been prepared for a prohibition of left turns out of Aubrey Court onto Aviation Boulevard. 4. Initiate a study to determine the feasibility and acceptability of removing all curb parking on Aviation Blouevard between Pacific Coast Highway and Prospect Avenue in order to provide for separate left turn lanes and/or a raised median island. Director's Comment: This report and the traffic engineer's comments will be forwarded to the circulation element consultants. No action is necessary at this time. 5. Remove the curb parking (3 spaces) on the north side of Aviation Boulevard west of Owosso Avenue to improve westbound sight distance for Ocean Drive crossing. Director's Comment: A resolution has been prepared for City Council consideration. 6. Remove two curb spaces on the south side of Aviation Boulevard west of Ocean Drive to improve sight distance for eastbound tarffic approaching the crosswalk. Director's Comment: A resolution has been prepared for City Council consideration. 7. Do not consider signalization nor placement of a flashing beacon at the intersection of Aviation/Owosso and Aviation/Ocean Drive as the warrants for a signal are not met. Director's Comment: No further action is necessary. Fiscal Impact: No additional appropriation is necessary to implement the recommendations. 2 Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Do nothing. Respectfully submitted, Ant ony Antich Director of Public Works Attachments: Resolutions (2) AA:mv avi/pwadmin 3 Concur: PROSPf-Cl Owosso AVE.-h.-MST/A/c RED CURD 111111111/ PROPOSED/114 57VPP1 NG P --of 1 I BONNIE BRAE ST. er TRAFFIC SIGNAL :.. STOP SIGN AVE. OCEAN DR. 0 GREY PACIFIC COAST AVIATION BLVD. ROPOSED NO STOPPING HWY. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FOR A TRAFFIC REGULATORY (NO LEFT TURN) SIGN ON AUBREY COURT AT AVIATION BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, limited sight distance necessitates the need for a regulatory sign at the intersection of Aubrey Court and Aviation Boulevard (north side of Aviation Boulevard). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California desires to install a no left turn sign on Aubrey Court at Aviation Boulevard. WHEREAS, the City traffic engineer has the authority to determine those intersections at which drivers of vehicles shall not make a right, left or U-turn, and shall place proper signs at such intersections. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 238, NS Subsection 5.1, Section 19-49 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. titled "Restricted turn signs -Authority to install", a "No Left Turn" sign shall be installed on Aubrey Court at Aviation Boulevard (north side). SECTION 2. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of November, 1988 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Califo .ia ATTEST: City Clerk PPROVED ty Atto ney 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A NO STOPPING RESTRICTION ON AVIATION BOULEVARD AS HEREIN DESCRIBED SET FORTH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. N.S. 2435, as amended shall be and is hereby further amended by adding the following subsection to Section 5, No Stopping Zone. ADD: Section 5.1c - Aviation Boulevard, South Side, from 42 feet to 90 feet west from intersection of Ocean Drive and Aviation Boulevard. Section 5.1d - Aviation Boulevard, North side, between Owosso and Ocean Drive. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of November, 1988 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK PPROVED AS TO— ORM: 24 2 27 28 // /// Y ATTORNEY November 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 9, 1988 ARRANGEMENT OF DECEMBER, 1988 COUNCIL MEETING DATES Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the cancellation of the second meeting of December which would otherwise be scheduled for Decem- ber 27, and set Monday, December 19 at 6:00 p.m. as a special meeting date for a joint meeting with the Civil Service Board. Analysis: It has been the Council's practice not to hold the regular meet- ing occurring during the holiday season. To follow this preced- ent, the only regular meeting of the Council in December will be December 13, though any late developing items could be handled as part of the special meeting on December 19. Staff discussed delaying the December 13 meeting but, due to there being five Tuesdays in the month of November, a delay is not appropriate this year. Kevin B. North City Manager KBN/ld a 30 North Raymond Avenue Suite 708 Pasadena. Calif. 91103-3930 James P. Lough Attorney at Law October 31, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Restrictions on Adult Businesses and Video Stores Telephone (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 This memo is in response to the Council's request for a public opinion on restrictions placed on certain types of adult businesses. Under Section 8-2 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone), the permitted uses in the C-1 zone are listed. Video stores are defined under this permitted use list as follows: "Videocassette tape sales and rentals, except Adult "X" rated type; conditional use permit required subject to Section 10-2;..." (p. 496). Under this section, businesses that sell adult products as the predominant purpose of their business would be prevented in the C-1 and C-2 zones. However, businesses in the C-1 and C-2 zones may sell some adult products without being considered an "adult" business under the Hermosa Beach Zoning Code or the federal Constitution. This is one of the reasons behind the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process for video stores. The CUP process allows regulation of a video store that sells some "adult" type videos so they are not displayed or available to minors. The limits placed on businesses in the CUP process must be consistent with other businesses and the federal Constitution. JPL/gp Respectfully/su1 mitte ES P. LOUGH, City Attorney TY OF HERMOSA BEACH cc: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Michael Schubach, Planning Director Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk 31/SR1031 9b Mayor Rosenberger City Council City Manager I request consideration for Council Agenda: Amendment, New Ordinance, Overlay, whatever it takes, to zone all existing playfields, playgrounds, trail corridors, areas used for recreation, so that uses under our Article 9.5 0 S Open Space Zone, would require approval by the electorate for any parking or building in these areas. Although, we cannot dedicate until we have ownership, it is appropriate that we review our existing open space zoning uses, and more properly reflect the citizens' expectations in the ordinance; especially with the expectation of ownership of the AT&SF right-of-way. Most people think of open space as lands- caped,green areas used for recreation, not allowing parking and buildings in or on the open spaces. Thanks, lOa