The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/24/89"Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." -Confucius AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 24, 1989 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Jim Rosenberger MAYOR PRO TEM June Williams COUNCILMEMBERS Roger. Creighton Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: American History Month, February, 1989 INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: James Bouziane, Police Dispatcher Kari Ann Propeck, Police Dispatcher Larissa Sarmanian, Police Dispatcher Carol Lockhart, Administrative Aide Ingrid Rademaker, Planning Aide Jean Brian, Clerk Typist Fran O'Connor, Secretary Terri Lyn Edison, Recreation Specialist Andrew Herbold, Recreation Specialist CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. - 1 - 00 Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested -9 si/ those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: m ' following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve minutes as follows:a) Regular meeting of the City'Council held on December 13, 1988. 2) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on December 19, 1988. 3) Regular meeting of January 10, 1989. (b) - Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future 'Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file November, 1988 finan- cial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Report 2) City Treasurer Report (e) (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to authorize call for bids Traffic Signal Preemption Project (CIP 86-176). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 17, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing sections of certain streets throughout the City as one-way. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 13, 1989. Recommendation to approve state grant funds projects as recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. Memorandum from Assis- tant City Manager Alana Mastrian-Handman dated January 18, 1989. Recommendation to deny claims for damages and refer to City's insurance adjusters, as follows: 1) Toya Jackson, 11409 Oxford Ave., Hawthorne, CA 90250, filed January 9, 1989; alleged trip and fall. 2) Paul Haase, 1600 Ardmore, #306, Hermosa Beach, 90254, filed December 29, 1988; alleged police brutality. (i) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19555 for a 2 -unit condominium at 803 Loma Drive. (j) (k) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1989. Recommendation to approve class specification of Court Liaison Officer and Property Evidence/CAL ID Technician and revised class specification for Senior Building In- spector. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 15, 1989. Recommendation to approve plans and specifications and authorize to bid - Pier storm damage, (CIP 88-614). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 12, 1989. (1) Recommendation to approve request of,Vasek Polak for a 30 -day extension of lease. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated January 19, 1989. (m) Recommendation to approve findings for Power Street. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated January 18, 1989. (n) (o) (p) Recommendation to approve plans and specifications and authorize call for bids - Highland Avenue widening, CIP 85-102. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 12, 1989 Recommendation to receive and file status report on moratorium on the issue of building permits for struc- tures in the multi -use corridor. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1989. Recommendation to adopt a resolution accepting the penal code requirements relating to the selection and training standards of Public Safety Dispatchers. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated January 19, 1989. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-972 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR WEST SIDE OF MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET FROM R-2 TO R-1. For adoption. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 89-973 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20, SECTION 20 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "NUISANCES" BY ADDING A SUBSECTION PERTAINING TO MULTI- PLE POLICE RESPONSES TO ANY LOUD OR UNRULY ASSEMBLAGE. 7j For adoption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. - 3 - 5. PROPOSED STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS 1989-90 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian- Handman dated January 18, 1989 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE WITHIN THE 17' SETBACK AT 1836 PALM DRIVE. (Continued from January 10, 1989 meeting. 7. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO EXCLUDE ADULT VIDEOS FROM A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS AT 1312 HERMOSA AVENUE, HERMOSA VIDEO. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1989.. • 8. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A VARIANCE FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 576 - 21ST STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1989. (Recommendation to open and continue hearing to February 14, 1989.) HEARINGS 9. MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT IN R-2 ZONE (Continued from January 10, 1989 meeting.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 3, 1989. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 10. CONSIDERATION OF REFUSE CONTRACT ALTERNATIVES. Memoran- dum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dat- ed January 12, 1989. 11. STUDY OF BUS BENCHES AND SHELTERS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 11, 1989. 12. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, BY ADDING SECTION PERTAINING TO COST RECOVERY FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAUSED BY PERSONS UNDER INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUGS. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated December 28, 1988. 13. RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SUP- PLEMENTAL TO 911 MOU ESTABLISHING A TRIAL PERIOD FOR AN ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC WORKS FIELD OPERATIONS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed January 14, 1989. 14. RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT ON CITY HALL 4-10 SCHEDULE. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed January 14, 1989. 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 16. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Recommendation for City Council to consider attendance at League of California Cities Employee Relations In- stitute. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 15, 1989. Sub -committee report on City Manager compensation and evaluation process. Memorandum from Council Subcommit- tee of Councilmembers Creighton and Sheldon dated January 15, 1989. 17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams of proper name for the former Santa Fe right-of-way. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. 18. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT TO 6:30 P.M., JANUARY 31, 1989 FOR ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING FOR REVIEW OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FINANCING OPTIONS (6:30) AND JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION (7:45). CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... • HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family ,oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers , .• 1 THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the• terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law.' The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior .to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports r. City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings itemsto the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since. the agenda was prepared on the preceding. Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on .the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. • January 17, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 24, 1989 INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES The following new employees are presented to the City Council for introduction: James Bouziane, Police Dispatcher James was appointed Police Dispatcher on November 29, 1988. Kari Ann Propeck, Police Dispatcher Kari Ann, formerly a Technical Aide in the General Services Department began serving as Police Dispatcher on January 25, 1989: Larissa Sarmanian, Police Dispatcher Larissa was appointed Police Dispatcher on November 29, 1988. Carol Lockhart, Administrative Aide Carol was appointed as Administrative Aide for the Department of Building & Safety on November 7, 1988. Ingrid Rademaker, Planning Aide Ingrid began serving as Planning Aide for our Planning Department on November 28, 1988. Jean Brian, Clerk Typist Jean was appointed Police Department Clerk Typist on December 12, 1988. Fran O'Connor, Secretary Fran was appointed secretary on January 9, 1989 and will be available for word-processing services for all departments. 1 Terri Lyn Edison, Recreation Specialist Terri Lyn was appointed Recreation Specialist for the Community Resources Department on January 1, 1989. Andrew Herbold, Recreation Specialist Andrew was appointed Recreation Specialist for the Community Resources Department on November 14, 1988. Respectfully submitted, Noted: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director 2 i` 'Kevin Northcraft City Manager MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, December 13, 1988 at the hour of 7:36 P.M. CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.9(a) Litigation: Gotanda v. Hermosa Beach, Fouce v. Hermosa Beach, People v. Stitson, Herriott v. Hermosa Beach and Creighton v. Hermosa Beach, real estate negotiations involving the City Maintenance Yard with MacPherson Oil and the Hermosa Beach City Elementary School District and Personnel and Meet and Confer issues, at the hour of 6:02 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -.Assistant *City Manager Alana Mastrian-Handman. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None PRESENTATION OF SERVICE PLAQUE TO FRANK HOLBOROW, RETIRING BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR - Mr. Holborow was not present, and the plaque will be presented at his retirement party. CITIZEN COMMENTS Richard Reznichek - Chairman Parks, Rec. & Comm. Res. Commission - urged council support of items 1(r) Outdoor Basketball Complex and 1(s) Master Plan for Parks & Rec. Warren Lombardi - 1845 Valley Park - asked to address item 1(w) grading plan for Power Street. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (w) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (a) Williams, (d) Creighton, (f) Sheldon, (m) Williams, (o) Sheldon, (p) Sheldon, (r) Creighton, (s) Creighton, and (w) Simpson. Motion Simpson, second Williams. So ordered. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 22, 1988. Action: 'To bring back the minutes at the first meeting in January. (Clarification regarding Biltmore Site was requested, item 14a.) Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 28351 through 28361 inclusive, and 28363 through 28524 inclusive, noting voided warrants 28355, 28364, 28365, 28366, and 28394. a - 1 - Minutes 12-13-88 (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the monthly Invest- ment Report for November, 1988. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated December 5, 1988. (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the Monthly Investment Re- port for November, 1988. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the objection of Creighton. Recommendation_to award contract for sanitary sewer rehabilitation capital improvement project 87-405, Tar- gert Area 3. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 5, 1988. Action: 1) Award the contract for Sanitary Sewer Rehab., CIP 87-405 to Colich & Sons (JV) for a cost not to exceed $680,845. 2) Authorize the Mayor to sign the contract 3) Authorize staff to issue addenda as neces- sary within budget limitations. Recommendation to enter into an agreement for contract administration and inspection services on sanitary sewer improvements, Target Area 3, CIP 87-405. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated November 30, 1988. Action: Staff to meet and interview inspector from Harris, and to come back on December 19 if possible. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (g) A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CTIP). For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 5, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5205, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE COM- MUTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN." (h) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #46950 FOR A 6 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 442 AND 504 HERMOSA AVENUE. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 5, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5206, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP # 46950 FOR A SIX -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 442-504 HERMOSA AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." 2 Minutes 12-13-88 1 • (i) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #19588 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 1061 LOMA DRIVE. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 5, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5207, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP # 19588 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1061 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." • (j) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #19757 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 1057 LOMA DRIVE. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 5, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5208, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP # 19757 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1057 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (k) Recommendation to approve request for a 4 -way stop at Longfellow/Tennyson Place and no parking zone (red curb) on west side of Tennyson Place, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 1, 1988. Supplemental letter from Paul Gongaware - 674 Longfellow Avenue dated Dec.13. <: Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5209, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5185, BY ADDING THERETO A STOP INTERSECTION ON LONGFELLOW AVENUE ENTRANCE TO TENNYSON PLACE EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND AS HEREIN SET FORTH." (1) A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.NS 2435, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING THERETO A NO PARKING ZONE ALONG VALLEY DRIVE AND 25TH STREET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated November 30, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5210, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. NS2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A NO PARKING ZONE ALONG VALLEY DRIVE AND 25TH STREET HEREIN SET FORTH." (m) A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SPEED SURVEY ON MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 5, 1988. Supplemental petition with 22 signatures opposing increasing the speed limit. Action: To conduct a new survey and increase enforce- ment of the running of the stop signs. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. 4 - 3 - Minutes 12-13-88 (n) (o) (p) (q) Recommendation to approve new class specification for Deputy City Engineer and revised class specification for Business License Inspector, and approve amending Public Works Position Allocation Plan. Memorandum from Person- nel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1988. Recommendation to ratify extension of contract with South Bay Regional Communications Center. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Wisniewski dated December 7, 1988. A staff report was presented by Director Wisniewski. Action: To ratify staff action to extend Regional Com- munications Center services into December, 1988, and authorize the City Manager to sign the attached (or sub- stantially similar) new month-to-month contract agree- ment for services with RCC, and to receive and file re- port. (Any changes will be ratified.) Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve Request for Proposals to sell surplus City lots on 1st Street and 1st Place. Memoran- dum from City Manager Northcraft dated Dec. 8, 1988. Action: That the City Council authorize appropriate staff actions in order to offer for sale three City sur- plus lots on 1st Street and 1st Place. Such steps to include review of title, notification of lessee of two of -the lots, and solicitations of real estate broker proposals to conduct the sale as specifically recommen- ded below. (Follow an auction process similar to that used for the Seaview property; but seek a diversity of proposals to identify perhaps other methods of obtaining the most satisfactory result.) Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for office space in the Community Center. Memorandum from Comm. Resour- ces Director Alana Mastrian dated December 1, 1988. (r) A RESOLUTION FOR APPLICATION TO THE STATE FOR THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF PROJECT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF OUTDOOR BASKETBALL COMPLEX . For adop- tion. Memorandum fromm Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated December 1, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5211, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE, COASTAL, AND PARK LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1988 FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECT'(OUTDOOR BASKETBALL COMPLEX) Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. 4 Minutes 12-13-88 (s) Recommendation to approve soliciting proposals for a Master Plan for Parks and Recreation and to appropriate $25,000 for the project. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mastrian-Handman dated December 1, 1988. Action: Approve the concept of developing a City-wide Master Plan for Parks and Recreation; appropriate $25,000 from Prospective Expenditures into the Community Resources Contract Services Account; and direct staff to issue a Request for Proposals. (To attempt to have the hearings on this item at Council Chambers if possible.) Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. (t) A RESOLUTION RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1988, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY THE PROVISIONS OF LAW. For adop- tion. Memorandum from City Clerk Midstokke dated Decem- ber 5, 1988. (u) (v) (w) Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5212, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH THE GENERAL ELEC- TION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1988, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW." Recommendation to receive and file a report concerning proposed emergency ambulance service agreements and franchise zones with Los Angeles County. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Wisniewski dated December 1, 1988. Recommendation to approve Extension Agreement and re- vised plans - Vasek Polak BMW Agreement. Memorandum from Planning Director Schubach dated December 6,1988. Recommendation to approve hydrology report and concep- tual grading plan for Tentative Tract 30986 (commonly known as the Power Street development). Memorandum from Public Works Director Antich dated November 29, 1988. Supplemental memorandum from Public Works Director dated December 8, 1988. Action: To support item number 3. Staff to review grad- ing practice in the city, and to return to council with a recommendation for an ordinance. Motion Simpson, second Williams. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None 5 Minutes 12-13-88 Proposed Action: To approve staff recommendation 1, 2, and 4. Motion Sheldon. Motion was withdrawn until after public testimony. Addressing the Council on this item were: Warner Lombardi - 1845 Valley Park Jim Marquez - 1344 Park View Ave. M.B. representing developer Gordon Evans - 1769 Valley Park Vicky Garcia - 1835 Valley Park Proposed Further Action: To approve items 1, 2, and 4 of staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. AYES - Sheldon NOES - Creighton, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Councilmember Creighton stated his findings: 1) Causes a difficulty with the water; washes to no proper disposition; just floods. 2) Strongest finding in approving the preliminary grad- ing plan was that the land would remain at the same ex- isting grade of the easterly adjoining lots. These findings are the justification to have the pre- liminary grading plan remain in effect. Action: Refer the matter to the Planning Commission. Authority for this decision is found in the Government Code -Subdivision Map Act. The Planning Commission is the designated body charges with the duty of making inves- tigations and reports on design (Section 66415). Design means, among other things, drainage and grading (Section 6_6418); with the above findings. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None A recess was called at 10:03 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:15 P.M. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-968 - AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONE OF AREA 4 FROM R-3 TO R-1 AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGA- TIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-968. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. (b) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18-3 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "MINORS". For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated December 1, 1988. 6 Minutes 12-13-88 Action: To waiver full reading of Ordinance No. 88-969 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 18-3 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "MINORS"." Motion Simpson, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-969. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1 a, d, f, m, o, p, r, s, and w were discussed at this item but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Petition with 522 signatures requesting railroad right- ' of; -way to remain as an off -leash area, and 6 letters from various residents requesting area to remain as it is currently. Supplemental petition with 30 additional signature. Further supplemental petition with 19 addi- tional signatures, supplemental letter from James Toomey 39 -10th Street received December 12, oppossing leash law enforcement, Eileen Martin - 329 -31st Street, and Loni Sacks - 519 -24th Place. Addressing the council on this item as spokesperson for a Marge group in the audience was: Tom Arp - 233 Ardmore Avenue Action: To set a Public Hearing for the agenda at the earliest reasonable date, to decide whether or not to enforce the leash law on the railroad right-of-way, ful- ly noticed, with no enforcement until after the public hearing. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger-. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PROPOSED REZONE OF AREA 10 FROM R-2 TO R-1, AREA 11 FROM R-3 TO R-2, AND AREA 12 FROM R-3 TO C-3 OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH ORDINANCE. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 5, 1988. - 7 - Minutes 12-13-88 AREA 10 Councilmember Creighton declared an apparent conflict of interest, since he received the 300 foot notice. A staff report was presented by Planning Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak was: Alan Stacee representing Victor Farfen, owner of a duplex John Steiner AREA 11 A staff report was presented by Planning Director Schubach. -The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Sako Miho - 731 -9th Street Ellis Chaney - 611 -9th Street Earl Seals - 611 -9th Street Sybil Hess - 647 -9th Street Carol Germaine - 653-655 9th Street John Hales - 624 -8th Place Michael Collins - 636 -9th Street The Public Hearing was closed. AREA 12 Councilmember Simpson declared an apparent conflict of interest, since she received the 300 foot notice. A staff report was presented by Planning Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Pat Riley - 725 -24th Place The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To approve staff recommendation on Area 10 (R-2 to R -2B). Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered, noting the abstention of Creighton. Futher Action: To approve staff recommendation on Area 12 (No change). Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. Minutes 12-13-88 Further Action: To approve staff recommendation on Area 11 (R-3 to R-2). Motion Wiliams, second Rosenberger. AYES - Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None ABSTAIN - Creighton (due to being off the dais during the Public Hearing) Further Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 88-970 entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS 10 AND 11 AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF AN EN- VIORNMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Final Action: To introduce Ordinace No. 88-970. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the abstention of Creighton. HEARINGS . 6. REPEAL OF TAX EXEMPTIONS. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated December 8, 1988. Supplemen- tal additional information from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated December 12, 1988. A. ORDINANCE NO. 88-966 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAP- A TER 30, ARTICLE III, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX, SEC- TION 30-12. DEFINITIONS. For adoption. B. ORDINANCE NO. 88-967 - AN ORDINANCE REPEALING HBMC CITY CODE SECTION 30-52, REFUND OF UTILITY TAXES IN EXCESS OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS, AND AMENDING SEC- TION 30-55, INTEREST AND PENALTY. For adoption. A staff report was presented by City Manager Northcraft. The Hearing was opened, no one coming forward to speak on item A, the hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-966 entitled "AN OR- DINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMEND- ING CHAPTER 30, ARTICLE III, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX, SECTION 30-12. DEFINITIONS." Motion Williams, second Simpson. So ordered. The Hearing was opened on item B. Coming forward to speak were: Paul Schupp - 23440 Civic Center Way, Malibu - rep. Al- pha Beta Market Co. For the record, stated that the ac- tion considered is not within the power of this board to take. Mary Martel - 617 Sunset Blvd. Arcadia - rep. Vons Phil Freland - 220 -1st St. Manhattan Beach - rep. Boc- cattos Market 9 Minutes 12-13-88 The Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-967 entitled AN OR- DINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 30-52, REFUND OF UTILITY TAXES IN EXCESS OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS, AND AMENDING SECTION 30-55, INTEREST AND PENALTY. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None 7. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MERGING OF LOTS LOCATED AT 1214 TENTH STREET, 1233 - 21ST STREET, AND 425 ARDMORE AVENUE,.WITH RESOLUTION. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 16, 1988. A staff report was presented by Planning Director Schubach. The Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Brad Baker - 515 Pier Avenue - rep. owner of 1214 -10th Street Brad Baker - rep. owners of 1233 -21st Street Maria del Rio - owner of 425 Ardmore Avenue The Hearing was closed. Proposed Action: To allow lot line adjustments for lots of 4000 sq.ft. and 3500 sq.ft. at 1214 -10th Street. Motion Williams, second Simpson. Second was withdrawn, and motion died. Action: To approve staff recommendation on 1214 -10th Street., Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Further Action: To approve staff recommendation on 1233 -21st Street. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Further Action: To approve staff recommendation on 425 Ardmore Avenue. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5213, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1214 10TH STREET, 1233 21ST STREET, AND 425 ARDMORE AVENUE." Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. So ordered. - 10 - Minutes 12-13-88 8. SPECIAL STUDY OF A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT -IN THE R-2 ZONE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 6, 1988. This item was continued. Item 12(a) was addressed at this time, but is listed in order for clarity. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 9. REVIEW OF CITY GOALS. Memorandum from City Manager Ke- vin B. Northcraft dated November 17, 1988. (Continued from 11/22/88 meeting.) This item was continued. 10. RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 19-1/2 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "NOISE REGULATION" AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CHAPTER 19-1/2, AND REPEAL-' ING CERTAIN PARTS OF CHAPTER 20, TITLED "NUISANCES", WHICH ARE IN CONFLICT WITH NEW CHAPTER 19-1/2. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated November 26, 1988. This item was continued. 4 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager salary review per agreement. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 7, 1988. This item was continued. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Selection of Biltmore Advisory Task Force. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated December 8, 1988. A staff report was presented by City Manager Northcraft. Action: Staff recommendation 1,2,3,4,&6, deleting joint meeting in item 2, changing item 4 to written report in writing by second meeting in February and deleting coun- cil in item 6 - task force charge by Mayor; and to in- clude approval of the nominations as submitted by the individual councilmembers. Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger. At this point Mayor Rosenberger read a list of 9 names that had been submitted to him: Minutes 12-13-88 Kathy Bergstrom Tony DeBellis Rosamond Fogg Ann Gubser Gary Kelly Art Mazirow Rod Merl Jerry Newton George Schmeltzer Councilmember Williams announced that her appointments were Pat Hill and Jan McHugh. Proposed Substitute Motion: That each councilmember states his appointments' to the committee. Motion Williams - dies for a lack of a second. Addressing the council on this item was Parker Herrriott. Vote on Main Motion: AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None Further Action: To appoint George Schmeltzer as Chair- man of the Biltmore Site Citizens Advisory Task Force. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. AYES - Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger. NOES - Creighton, Williams (due to feelings that the committee should appoint their own chair, and not that she objects to the choice) 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams re. pos- sible moratorium in the Specific Plan Area. (b) (c) This item was continued. Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams re. Beach Drive street rededication in the Specific Plan Area. Action: This item was continued. Request by Councilmember Creighton for review of status of funds from Gotanda vs. City of Hermosa Beach lawsuit. Action: This item was continued. - 12 - Minutes 12-13-88 14. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Parker Herriott - submitted letter regarding alleged violations of the Fair Political Practices Act. ADJOURNMENT The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, December 14, 1988 at the hour of 1:10 A.M. to a adjourned regular meeting on Monday, December 19, 1988 at the hour of 6:00 P.M. Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk - 13 - 4 Minutes 12-13-88 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Monday, December • 19, 1988 at the hour of 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None CONVENE TO A WORKSHOP MEETING WITH THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ROLL CALL Present: Brand, Janik, Miller, Warner, Chairpersdn Dalton Absent: None Also Present: City Manager Northcraft, Personnel Director Blackwood, City Clerk Midstokke, Deputy Clerk Riddle 1) ROLES, RESPONSIBILITES, AND AUTHORITY OF THE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 11, 1988. 2) PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. Memo- randum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 11, 1988. 3) DISCUSSION OF THE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IN CERTIFYING EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY LISTS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 11, 1988. 4) REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE ORGANI- ZATION RELATIONS RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 11, 1988. There was general discussion on the above topics by the Council and the Commission. There was direction given by the Mayor that a follow-up report would be prepared by the Personnel Director and the City Attorney regarding item number 4. The Commission expressed that they had put a great deal of time and effort into this item and would appreciate a response from the Council. There was a recess called at 7:25 P.M. The adjourned meeting of the City Council was called to order at 7:35 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - City Manager Northcraft The following items were continued from the December 13, 1988 Regular Meeting: 1 1a 2 Minutes 12-19-88 1(f) AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, TARGET AREA 3, CIP 87-405. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated November 30, 1988. Supplemental memorandum from Director Antich dated December 15, 1988. Action: To approve staff recommendation and authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with James M. Montgomery for contract administration and inspection services at a cost not to exceed $83,021 and authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. 1(a) RESUBMITTAL OF MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1988 WITH VERBATIM OF ITEM 14(a) BILTMORE SITE. Action: To approve the minutes as submitted at the last Council meeting. Motion Creighton, second Williams. AYES.- Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None Mayor Rosenberger directed that Resolution No. 88-5203 be placed on the next agenda for amendment. HEARINGS 8. SPECIAL STUDY OF A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT IN THE R-2 ZONE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 6, 1988. Action: To continue this item to the January Meeting for public input. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 9. REVIEW OF CITY GOALS Action: To receive and file, and review in greater detail in 12 months. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 10. RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 19-1/2 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "NOISE REGULATION" AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CHAPTER 19-1/2, AND REPEAL - CERTAIN PARTS OF CHAPTER 20, TITLED "NUISANCES", WHICH ARE IN CONFLICT WITH NEW CHAPTER 19-1/2". For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated November 26, 1988. 2 Minutes 12-19-88 .,. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 88-971 titled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 19 1/2 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "NOISE REGULATION," IN ITS ENTIRETY AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CHAPTER 19 1/2, AND REPEALING CERTAIN PARTS OF CHAPTER 20, TITLED "NUISANCES," WHICH ARE IN CONFLICT WITH NEW CHAPTER 19 1/2", with amendment to provide that the City Clerk prepares a summary for publication. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) CITY MANAGER SALARY REVIEW PER AGREEMENT. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 7, 1988. Action: To appoint a subcommittee of Sheldon and Creighton to make a recommendation back to City Council in January regarding current compensation and new contract. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. . 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL '(a) Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams re. possible moratorium in the Specific Plan Area. Action: To discuss this matter. Motion Creighton, second Williams. Proposed Further Action: Staff to come back with a Ordinance for a Moratorium for SPA allowing C-2 standards on the privately owned property. Motion Williams. Dies for a lack of a second. (b) Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams re. Beach Drive street rededication in the Specific Plan Area. Proposed Action: To discuss this matter. Motion Williams. Dies for a lack of a second. (c) Request by Councilmember Creighton for review of status of funds from Gotanda vs. City of Hermosa Beach lawsuit. Proposed Action: To place this item on an agenda. Motion Creighton, second Williams. AYES - Williams NOES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger It was noted that this item will come back at Mid -Year Budget Review. 3 Minutes 12-19-88 The following was a new item for this meeting: 1. RECOMMENDATION TO RENEW COVERAGE WITH FIREMAN'S FUND FOR AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 15, 1988. Action: To approve staff recommendation as amended to award the City's vehicle physical damage insurance (insuring only high value vehicles) to Firemans Fund Insurance Co. for a premium not to exceed $14,600; and award the City's Property Insurance to Firemans Fund Ins. Co. for a premium not to exceed $16,600. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. CITIZEN COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT The Adjourned Regular of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California adjourned on Monday, December 19, 1988 at the hour of 8:34 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, January 10, 1988. 4 teetlee,gi*".;164t321& Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Minutes 12-19-88 .4 ,> MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, January 10, 1989 at the hour of 7:38 P. M. CLOSED SESSION - held pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(a) regarding litigation Gotanda v. Hermosa Beach, Simmons v. Hermosa Beach, Fouce v. Hermosa Beach, Quanta v. Hermosa Beach, Creighton v. Hermosa Beach; and potential litigation under 54956.9(c) and Personnel Matters. Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Simpson ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday Week January 8 - 18, 1989 PRESENTATION OF MODEL OF LORETO MISSION, HERMOSA BEACH SISTER CTY The presentation was made by Joe Diaz; accepted by Mayor Rosenberger; and will be on display in the City Hall foyer. CITIZEN COMMENTS None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (b) through (s) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (g) Creighton, (1) Williams, (o) Williams, (q) Williams, and (s) Williams. Motion Williams, second Simpson. So ordered. (a) (b) Recommendation to approve minutes as follows: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on December 13, 1988. 2) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on December 19, 1988. This item was continued to the meeting of January 24, 1989. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 28362, 28525 through 28546 inclusive and 28548 through 28707 inclusive noting voided warrants 28548, 28549, 28568, 28614, and 28615. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. 1 Minutes 1-10-89 la (d) Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1988 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Reports 2) City Treasurer's Report (e) A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR 1989. Memo- randum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated January 6, 1989. ' (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) Action: To adopt Resolution No. '89-5214, entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE AN- NUAL STATEMENT' OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1989. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dat- ed January 3, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file update report of Grant Reconciliation Project. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian-Handman dated December 28, 1988. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to waive parking fees for Sand and Strand Run on February 5, 1989. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated December 28, 1988. (7:00 AM and 12:00 Noon) Recommendation to accept the vacancies created on the Cable TV Board. Memorandum from General Services Direc- tor Joan Noon dated December 28, 1988. Recommendation to approve reclassification in the Com- munity Resources Department from the position of Clerk Typist to Administrative Aide. Memorandum from Person- nel Administrator Robert Blackwood dated January 2, 1989. Recommendation to deny claims and refer to City's Claims Administrator the claims of: 1) Timothy G. Hart, 1121 - 19th Street, Hermosa Beach, filed 12-19-88; alleged damage to vehicle; 2) Robert J. Collins, 1720 Ardmore, Hermosa Beach, filed 12-12-88; alleged damage to personal property. Recommendation to approve Cable TV Board recommendation to hire Communications Support Corporation as consul- tants to City. Memorandum from General Services Direc- tor Joan Noon dated December 28, 1988. 2 Minutes 1-10-89 f Action: Accept the recommendation of the CATV Board to hire Communications Support Corporation to review the CATV Franchise Documents and assist the board in com- pleting the duties assigned to them, at a cost not to exceed $10,000. Monies to be provided by MultiVisions as prescribed in their letter of December 19, 1988 and held in the City's Deposit account. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to award agreement for preliminary en- gineering and design of sanitary sewer, Target Area 4, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 12., 1988. • Action: To award an agreement for preliminary engineer- ing and design of Sanitary Sewer, Target Area 4,' CIP 88- 406, to Harris & Associates in an amount not to exceed $94,050 and authorize staff to issue addenda as neces- sary within budget limitations. Recommendation to receive and file status report of Capital Improvement Projects. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 14, 1988. Recommendation to approve location of Stop By Center Program at the Clark Field Recreation Complex. Memoran- dum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian- Handman dated December 28, 1988. Addressing the council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 7th Street Lee Schmidt - S. B. Center for Counseling. Action: To approve the installation of a trailer at the Clark Field for the Stop by Center with the City provid- ing electricity; and that this be approved only through June 30, 1989. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objections of Simpson and Williams. Recommendation to receive and file monthly investment report for December, 1988. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated January 3, 1989. Recommendation to direct staff to investigate alternate means for prosecution of violators of zoning and housing regulations. Memorandum from Building and Safety Direc- tor William Grove dated December 29, 1988. Action: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file report re. S.C.A.G. revisions to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 3, 1989. 3 Minutes 1-10-89 (s) Recommendation to receive and file report regarding sug- gested reorganization of Los Angeles County Beaches and Harbors Department. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated January 5, 1989. Addressing the Council on this issue were: Wilma Burt - 1152 -7th Street - requested that the record reflect the fact that we allow the county lifeguard headquarters to be on our privately owned beach for $1.00 a year. Jerry Compton - rep. Chamber bf Commerce - urged passage of resolution. Action: To approve staff recommendation and adopt Resolution No. 89-5215 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE EFFICIENCY AND ECONO- MY COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO REORGANIZE THE DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS." Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-969 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18- 3 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ENTITLED "MINORS". For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-969. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 88-970 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREAS 10 AND 11 AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOP- TION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-970. Motion Simpson, second Williams. So ordered, noting the abstention of Creighton. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 88-971 - AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 19-1/2 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, ENTITLED 'NOISE REGULA- TION" AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CHAPTER 19-1/2, AND REPEALING CERTAIN PARTS OF CHAPTER 20, ENTITLED "NUISAN- CES", WHICH ARE IN CONFLICT WITH NEW CHAPTER 19-1/2. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-971. Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items g, 1, o, q, and s were discussed at this time, but are listed in order for clarity. - 4 - Minutes 1-10-89 At this time the following person spoke under Citizen Comments: Anthony Guliano - 49 -18th Street - re: motorcycle parking on 14th Street - the Mayor gave direction referring this to the City Man- ager for a response. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Don Karasevicz dated December 1, 1988 re. multi -use corridor; response from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 3, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item were: Don Karasevicz - 840 15th Street Wilma Burt - 1152 7th Street Action: To receive and file. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ,ALLOW A GARAGE TO ENCROACH INTO 17' SETBACK AND TO PRO - ;VIDE NO GUEST PARKING SPACE AT 1836 PALM DRIVE. Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 29, 1988. The City Clerk announced that the applicant did not give proper notice to adjoining properties within 300 feet. Action: The Mayor opened the Public Hearing, and con- tinued it open until the next meeting on January 24, 1988. 6. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND VACATION OF A PORTION OF 21ST STREET NEAR LOMA DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 40' X 101' AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 29, 1988. Supplemental map of vacation of Lot Line adjustment - Letter from Saul Minkus, 2056 Monterey, dated January 4, 1989. A staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Otto Palmer - 632 Monterey B1, DBA Ocean Pacific Const. owner of lots. Jerry Compton - Architect John Dunbabin - 2432 Myrtle Dr - in favor Howard Sorce - 2012 Loma Drive - in favor Shanda Slocum - 510 21st Street - in favor - Petition with 175 signatures Jeff Rue - 641 25th Street - in favor - 5 - Minutes 1-10-89 Scott Manley 520 21st Street - in favor Wilma Burt - 1152 7th Street - vacation proper but com- bine lots. Susan Miller - 2020 Monterey - opposed Nancy Gotond - 589 21st Street - in favor Celeste Core - 2004 Loma - opposed Mary Jo Mitchell - 2032 Monterey - oppose Bo Webber - 510 21st Street - in favor Marjorie Duncliff - 520 21st - in favor Dennis Anderson - 2100 Loma The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To approve the vacation and bring back a resolution finding that based on the evidence this eve- ning at the Public Hearing, that this easement is not necessary for present or prospective public use; and that in order to accomplish the vacation the legislative body conditions that only three houses be placed on the accompanying lots by the owner Otto Palmer; and a cer- tain square footage, 3200 square fejt on the houses also be conditioned; an additional condition is that no prop- erty returns to any person until a full and complete title report and guarantee is completed showing the underlying fee ownership. All the costs of this vaca- tion, title report, title search, including all city costs will be borne by the owner and applicant of this vacation. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams NOES - Mayor Rosenberger A recess was called at 9:50 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:05 P.M. 7. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE OF THE WEST SIDE OF MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET FROM MEDIUM DENSITY, R-2, TO LOW DENSITY, R-1, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE AND ADOPT AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Resolution for adop- tion and ordinance for waiver of full reading and intro- duction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 27, 1988. A staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Steve Peterson - 2460 Myrtle - in favor John Dunbabin - 2432 Myrtle - in favor Dean Nota - 2467 Myrtle Pam Donatelo - 2424 Myrtle The Public Hearing was closed. 6 Minutes 1-10-89 Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5216, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE WEST SIDE OF MYRTLE AVENUE, BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET, AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.", noting a correc- tion on line 18 from medium density residential to low density residential. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Further Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-972 entitled 'AN ORDINANCE OF. THE CITY•OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR THE WEST SIDE OF MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89-972. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. So ordered. 8. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR 1344 MANHATTAN AVENUE, 1348 MANHATTAN AVENUE, 1346 BAYVIEW DRIVE, AND 1428 MONTEREY BOULEVARD FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION. Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 27, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. Proposed Action: To continue this to the General Plan update. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. Motion was withdrawn. Proposed Action: To adopt the recommendation of the Planning Department. Motion Creighton, second Williams. Motion was withdrawn. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5217, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FOR THE AREA GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS 1344 AND 1348 MANHATTAN AVENUE, 1428 MON- TEREY BOULEVARD AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." 7 Minutes 1-10-89 (General Commercial to High Density Residential; and leaving 1346 Bayview Drive Commercial, rezoning to come back), with changes in the resolution to conform to City Council instead of Planning Commission. Motion Creighton, second Williams. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None 9. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FOR AREA 8A FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 27, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened, no one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5218, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FOR AREA 8A AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." (Low density to medium density.) Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 10. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FOR AREA 3 FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 27, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director. Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened, no one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5219, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, MANEDING THE GENERAL PLAN BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FOR AREA 3 AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGA- TIVE DECLARATION." (Low density to medium density.) Motion Rosenberger, second Williams. So ordered. HEARINGS 11. SPECIAL STUDY OF A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT IN THE R-2 ZONE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 3, 1989. (Continued from Decem- ber 13, 1988 meeting.) 8 - Minutes 1-10-89 This item was continued to the meeting of January 24, 1988. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 12. 13. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20, SEC- TION 20 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED 'NUISANCES' BY ADDING A SUBSECTION PERTAINING TO MULTI- PLE POLICE RESPONSES TO ANY LOUD OR UNRULY ASSEMBLAGE. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated De- cember 28, 1988. Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-973 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 20-2.2 TO CHAPTER 20 OF THE HERMOSA BECH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO THE USE OF MUL- TIPLE POLICE RESPONSES TO ANY LOUD OR UNRULY ASSEMBLAGE." Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor h Rosenberger NOES - None Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89-973. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE DEMOLITION OF OLD PROSPECT SCHOOL LOCATED AT 6TH AND PROSPECT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dat- edDecember 28, 1988. A staff report was presented by Community Resources Di- rector Mastrian-Handman. Addressing the council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 -7th Street Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue - offering the donation of his professional architectural services for remodel- ing, renovation of this building. Action: To deny recommenation, and send back requesting a recommendation regarding what to do, what cost, time frame, utilization of volunteer services, and neighbor- hood input with restoration in mind. Motion Simpson, second Sheldon. So ordered. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS None MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - CITY COUNCIL City Council/Planning Commission workshop. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 4, 1989. 9 Minutes 1-10-89 (b) (c) To schedule a workshop for Tuesday, January 31, 1989 at 7:45 P.M. - 9:15 P.M. with an agenda as follows: 1. Apartment vs. condominium standards. 2. Non -conforming uses and standards. 3. Parking standards. 4. Zoning standards review. Discussion of Resolution of Intent 88-5203 re. Biltmore Site Specific Plan Area adopted November 22, 1988. Action: To approve.. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. Status report from subcommittee on City Manager contract renewal. Memorandum from. Councilmembers Creighton. and Sheldon dated January 5, 1989. Mayor Rosenberger gave direction that the City Manager's performance be scheduled for the next Closed Session. A full packet will be presented to the Council as soon as possible, includingappraisal forms. 16. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL None 18. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None • ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting to the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, January 11, 1989 at the hour of 12:13 A.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tues- day, January 24, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. ‘iceraeei,,3 Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk - 10 - Minutes 1-10-89 • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 • • • • H • H • H H • H 0 H • H • H • • 0 • • • I s, PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H RICHARD*GAINES SMOKE DETECTORS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02643 001-400-4204-4311 00108 $77.75 01/17/89 BLDG MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/12-15 TO 12-31-88 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/1-1 TO 1-15-89 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/12-15 TO 12-31-88 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/12-15 TO 12-31-88 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/12-15 TO 12-31-88 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/12-15 TO 12-31-88 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/12-15 TO 12-31-88 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/12-15 TO 12-31-88 00243 001-202-0000-2030 01/04/89 00243 001-202-0000-2030 01/18/89 00243 105-202-0000-2030 01/04/89 00243 110-202-0000-2030 01/04/89 00243 145-202-0000-2030 01/04/89 00243 155-202-0000-2030 01/04/89 I PAGE 0001 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $77. 75 00252 $184,480.01 /ACCRUED PAYROLL. 00253 $228,254.77 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00142 $6,405.10 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00143 $42,335.85 ' /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00138 $1,970.58 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00139 $3,516.27 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00137 01/04/89 00243 705-202-0000-2030 00100 01/04/89 $7,797.41 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $13,776.73 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT ADV/DEC 88 $488,536.72 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00267 $72,314.22 01/11/89 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R A-1 COAST RENTALS M1SC CHGS/JAN 89 $72,314.22 $560,928.69 07654 28709 $0.00 01/18/89 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 00029 001-400-8614-4201 00011 $138.42 567206 00011 67206 12/31/88 CIP 88-614 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 28547 01/18/89 28711 01/18/89 28547 01/18/89 28547 01/18/89 28547 01/18/89 28547 01/18/89 28547 01/18/89 28547 01/18/89 28708 01/18/89 28715 01/18/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CIT( OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAGE 0002 DATE 01/19/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES. INC. INTOXILYZER REPAIR 38312 00138 001-400-2101-4309 12/28/88 POLICE $138.42 00183 $331.48 38312 07489 28716 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AFAA PUBLICATIONS 02616 001-400-2201-4316 483 12/31/88 FIRE $331.48 00152 $15.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15.00 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 00857 001-400-2101-4306 12/31/88 POLICE 00597 $180.00 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $180.00 R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD LEASE PMT/FEB 89 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00006 01/15/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY $841.29 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $841.29 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/DEC 88 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/DEC 88 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/DEC 88 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/DEC 88 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/DEC 88 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00614 12/31/88 FIRE 00152 12/31/88 001-400-3104-4309 00151 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00152 001-400-4204-4309 01195 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00327 12/31/88 EQUIP SERVICE 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00502 12/31/88 PARKING ENF $23.44 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $11.25 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $83.20 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $21.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $6.18 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $145.07 R ASL ENGINEERING 00244 001-210-0000-2110 WORK GUAR CHARGES 13335 12/30/88 483 05390 $15.00 00123 $0.00 28717 01/18/89 28718 01/18/89 00066 28719 $0.00 01/18/89 00017 28720 $0.00 01/18/89 00017 28720 $0.00 01/18/89 00017 28720 $0.00 01/18/89 00017 28720 $0.00 01/18/89 00017 28720 $0.00 01/18/89 02628 $485.49 13335 07652 28721 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/18/89 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION e **********************#atitati►itatat********it****it****aHtit**at****it*#it****** * * * VENDOR TOTAL R ASPA INSURANCE PLANS OTRLY LTD/CTY MANAGER PAGE 0003 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $485.49 02218 001-400-1212-4188 01260 $56.00 07505-0500415 07055 28722 00415 01/04/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER MISC CHGS/DEC 88 $56.00 01891 001-400-3104-4309 00150 $285.96 12/31/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AV—OX/PROFIRE MISC CHGS/DEC 88 $285.96 00603 001-400-2201-4309 00613 $50.73 12/31/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY SONIC DOOR ANNOUNCER R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 • 00407 001-400-2101-4309 00184 12/31/88 POLICE 00407 001-400-2101-4309 00185 6121 12/17/88 POLICE 00407 001-400-4204-4309 01196 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00407 001-400-4204-4309 01197 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00407 001-400-4204-4311 00111 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00407 001-400-4601-4305 00601 12/31/88 COMM RESOURCES 00407 110-400-3302-4305 00506 12/31/88 PARKING ENF 00407 110-400-3302-4311 00436 12/31/88 PARKING ENF $50.73 $6.39 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00124 28723 $0.00 01/18/89 00126 28724 $0.00 01/18/89 00125 28725 $0.00 01/18/89 $1,330.24 6121 07490 28725 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ' $0.00 01/19/89 $99.05 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $51.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $12.50 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $24.48 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $2.13 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $4.26 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00125 28725 $0.00 01/18/89 00125 28725 $0.00 01/18/89 00125 28725 $0.00 01/18/89 00125 28725 $0.00 01/18/89 00125 28725 $0.00 01/18/89 00125 28725 $0.00 01/18/89 w FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R BANC ONE LEASING 99 LEASE PMT/FEB 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.531.00 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00022 $417.96 01/15/89 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANK OF AMERICA NOV EXP/R. BLACKWOOD R BANK OF AMERICA DEC 88 EXP/R. BLACKWOOD *417.96 00180 001-400-1203-4201 00414 $168.92 11/30/88 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00180 001-400-1203-4201 00415 $83.96 12/31/88 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS EPDXY GUN 38189 R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS EPDXY GUN 38189 00251 01/09/89 00251 01/09/89 001-400-3103-4309 00777 ST MAINTENANCE 001-400-4204-4309 01188 BLDG MAINT *252.88 00054 28726 *0.00 01/18/89 07057 28727 *0.00 01/18/89 07059 28727 $0.00 01/18/89 $200.09 38189 07605 28728 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 01/18/89 $200.08 38189 07605 28728 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R BEACH CITIES•OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/DEC 88 02509 001-400-1203-4305 00186 12/31/88 PERSONNEL 02509 001-400-2101-4305 00885 12/31/88 POLICE 02509 001-400-4101-4305 00263 12/31/88 PLANNING . 02509 001-400-4205-4309 00328 12/31/88 EQUIP SERVICE 02509 001-400-4601-4305 00600 12/31/88 COMM RESOURCES *400.17 $26.99 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *31.65 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *10.05 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *32.46 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *4.35 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $105.50 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 01308 001-400-1212-4188 01261 $72.15 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01249 28729 *0.00 01/18/89 01249 28729 *0.00 01/18/89 01249 28729 $0.00 01/18/89 01249 28729 *0.00 01/18/89 01249 28729 *0.00 01/18/89 00055 28730 *0.00 01/18/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAGE 0005 DATE 01/19/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP i 01308 105-400-2601-4188 00657 $0.51 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 110-400-3301-4188 00641 $2.05 01/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 110-400-3302-4188 00848 $2.05 01/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 145-400-3401-4188 00596 $0.26 01/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 145-400-3402-4188 00594 $0.51 01/15/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 145-400-3403-4188 00079 $1.01 01/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 155-400-2102-4188 00289 $0.51 01/15/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 160-400-3102-4188 00601 $0.65 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 01293 01/15/89 01293 01/15/89 01293 01/15/89 001-400-1212-4188 01270 EMP BENEFITS 110-400-3302-4188 00855 PARKING ENF 145-400-3401-4188 00602 DIAL A RIDE 01293 145-400-3402-4188 00600 01/15/89 ESEA 01293 01/15/89 01293 01/15/89 705-400-1209-4188 00057 LIABILITY INS 705-400-1217-4188 00058 WORKERS COMP $79.70 39, 440. 89 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1,034.07 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $87.49 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $30.83 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $85.41 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $170.82 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00055 28730 $0.00 01/18/89 00055 28730 $0.00 01/18/89 00055 28730 $0.00 01/18/89 00055 28730 $0.00 01/18/89 00055 28730 $0.00 01/18/89 00055 20730 $0.00 01/18/89 00055 28730 $0.00 01/18/89 00055 28730 $0.00 01/18/89 00056 28731 $0.00 01/19/89 00056 28731 $0.00 01/19/89 00056 28731 $0.00 01/19/89 00056 28731 $0.00 01/19/09 00056 28731 $0.00 01/19/89 00056 28731 $0.00 01/19/09 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION e *** VENDOR TOTAL*•x*****************************************************************# R BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS OFF SUPP/STOCK/DEC 88 PAGE 0006 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $10,849.51 00005 001-400-1208-4305 00593 $770.88 12/31/88 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MARK*BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CDBG SERVICES/DEC 88 383/1 $770.88 00127 28732 $0.00 01/18/89 02478 001-400-1201-4201 00034 $1,210.00 383/1 07703 28733 12/31/88 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE LIEN FEES/DEC—JAN $1,210.00 02076 001-300-0000-3859 00017 $1,790.70 01/11/89 /REFUSE LIEN FEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES DUMP CHARGES/DEC 88 37002 $1,790.70 07332 28734 $0.00 01/19/89 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00201 $2,836.23 81200-0037002 00004 28735 12/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY CONT FORM BOND 46816 $2,836.23 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00344 $420.72 12/28/88 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *420. 72 R CANADA LIFE 00046 001-400-1212-4188 01264 $646.40 CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 $646.40 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01271 $2,621.18 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 105-400-2601-4188 00664 $76.74 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 146816 06998 28736 $0.00 01/18/89 00008 28737 $0.00 01/18/89 00024 28738 $0.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 $0.00 01/19/89 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 • • • • • • • • 4 • • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00647 317.37 01/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 110-400-3302-4188 00856 $593.07 01/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00603 $19.11 01/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 . 145-400-3402-4188 00601 $6.52 01/15/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 145-400-3403-4188 00084 $1.95 01/15/89 BUS PASS SUDSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 155-400-2102-4168 00294 $13.45 01/15/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00608 394.78 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00058 317.77 01/15/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00059 $6.31 01/15/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0007 DATE 01/19/09 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************4*** $3,468.25 P. J. I. *CASE CREDIT CORP. LEASE PMT/FED 89 01147 160-400-3102-6900 00075 $748.32 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 3748.32 * * * R CBCI SEM REG/N. KOWATSCHITSCH 02357 001-400-4201-4316 00135 $130.00 01/12/89 BUILDING /TRAINING VENDOR TOTAL***************************•**************************************** R CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY CELLULAR PHONE CHGS/NOV 78425 $130.00 00024 28738 30.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 $0.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 $0.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 30.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 30.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 30.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 30.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 $0.00 01/19/89 00024 28738 $0.00 01/19/89 00021 28739 $0.00 01/18/89 07505 28740 $0.00 01/18/89 02449 001-400-2101-4304 00317 $105.45 178428/178425 01110 11/27/88 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 28741 01/18/89 J , A FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 J PAY VENDOR NAME *** DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ******it******** t******* tit#its**********at*******************x-********* R CENTRAL DANK LEASING LEASE PMT/FEB 89 01226 001-400-2101-6900 00378 01/15/89 POLICE PAGE 0002 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $105.45 $1,978.59 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL*****u-************************************************************** R CENVAL LEASING 58 LEASE PMT/FED 89 00875 001-400-2101-6900 01/15/89 POLICE $1,978.59 00377 $594.51 /LEASE PAYMENTS . *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************-rF*************************************** R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHGS/JAN 89 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHGS/DEC BB 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00594 12/31/88 POLICE $594.51 $386.03 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00014 001-400-4204-4309 01193 $22.50 7255 01/15/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00014 001-400-4204-4311 00110 $49.97 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $458.50 R CHISWICK TRADING, INC. CITATION POLY BAGS 02644 110-400-3302-4305 00504 $115.00 49772 01/04/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $115.00 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENT/NOV—DEC 88 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENT/NOV—DEC 88 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00103 12/31/88 PUD WKS ADMIN 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00159 12/31/88 PARKING ENF $1,081.06 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $94.50 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COPY SUPPORT PRINT SERV/CITY CLERK 5434 $1, 175. 56 01729 001-400-1121-4305 00094 $153.79 01/12/89 CITY CLERK /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00024 28742 $0.00 01/18/89 00020 28743 $0.00 01/18/89 01212 28744 $0.00 01/18/89 7255 00114 28744 $0.00 01/18/89 01212 28744 $0.00 01/18/89 49772 07805 28745 $0.00 01/18/89 00002 28746 $0.00 01/18/89 00002 28746 $0.00 01/18/89 5434 04575 28747 $0.00 01/18/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY•OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAGE 0009 DATE 01/19/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************* R THE*DAILY BREEZE CROSSING GUARD AD $153.79 00642 001-400-1203-4201 00416 $69.87 392205-100 07030 28748 5-100 12/31/88 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $69.87 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHGS/DEC 88 $69.87 01390 001-400-3103-4311 00427 $26.97 12/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01390 105-400-2601-4311 00124 $492.02 12/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COSTS/DEC 88 $518.99 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00091 $180.46 01/10/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/NOV 88 07642 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/NOV 88 07642 $180.46 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00007 3616.83 01/03/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00072 $616.84 01/03/89 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,233.67 R THE *DEVELOPMENT MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R THE *DEVELOPMENT MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R THE *DEVELOPMENT MISC CHGS/DEC 88 00147 001-400-1101-4305 00217 $2.66 12/31/88 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00147 001-400-1201-4305 00118 $6.12 12/31/88 CITY MANAGER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES Q0147 001-400-2101-4305 00882 $36.74 12/31/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DUN & BRADSTREET SEM REG/D. ANDERSON 4 $45.52 00658 001-400-3103-4316 00017 $99.00 12/31/88 `ST MAINTENANCE /TRAINING 01217 28749 $0.00 01/18/89 01217 28749 $0.00 01/18/89 00014 28750 $0.00 01/18/89 107642 07653 28751 $0.00 01/18/89 107642 07653 $0.00 28751 01/18/89 01219 28752 $0.00 01/18/89 01219 28752 $0.00 01/18/89 01219 28752 $0.00 01/18/89 07254 28753 $99.00 01/1B/89 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R DUN & BRADSTREET SEM REG/M. FLAHERTY R DUN & BRADSTREET SEM REG/J. DAVIS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION e 00658 001-400-6101-4316 12/31/88 PARKS 00018 $99.00 /TRAINING 00658 105-400-2601-4316 00008 $99.00 12/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICES/NOV—DEC88 R EASY READER EMP ADS/JAN 89 /3166 PAGE 0010 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $297.00 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00047 $1,271.20 12/31/88 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING 00181 001-400-1203-4201 00417 01/12/89 PERSONNEL 07254 28753 $99.00 01/10/89 07254 28753 $99.00 01/18/89 04574 28754 $0.00 01/19/89 $70.00 3159/3166 07051 28754 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R - EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHGS/DEC 88 $1,341.20 00165 001-400-2101-4311 00596 $235.71 12/31/88 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-2201-4311 00256 $95.99 12/31/88 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-2401-4311 00129 $9.97 12/31/88 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00428 $408.37 12/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3104-4311 00012 $34.99 12/31/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4101-4311 00088 $142.93 12/31/88 PLANNING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 12/31/88 00165 12/31/88 001-400-4202-4311 00101 $141.89 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-4205-4309 00329 $9.35 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00113 $157.29 12/31/88 EQUIP.SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 01222 28755 $0.00 01/19/89 0 • O . to CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 • TIME 13:20:33 FOR 01/24/89 DATE 01/19/89 I PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # • DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4601-4311 00057 $63.75 01222 28755 MISC CHGS/DEC 88 12/31/88 COMM RESOURCES /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/19/89 a R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00170 $5.15 01222 28755 MISC CHCS/DEC 88 12/31/88 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/19/89 4 • R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00125 $108.56 01222 28755 MISC CHGS/DEC 88 12/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/19/89 0 • R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00437 $470.81 01222 28755 MISC CHGS/DEC 68 12/31/88 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE. $0.00 01/19/89 O a R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 160-400-3102-4311 00105 $104.15 01222 28755 MISC CHCS/DEC 88 12/31/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/19/89 0 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,988.91 • R ELECTROAPPLIANCE REFINISHING 02611 001-400-4202-4305 00354 $606.00 5051 07615 28756 PAINT OFC FURN/PUB WORKS 5051 01/11/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $606.00 01/18/89 • • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $606.00 • • R FABIANO CORP/KAVANAUGH DEV 01713 001-210-0000-2110 02626 $140.08 58953 07646 28757 WORK GUAR REFUND 58953 01/10/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/18/89 •• *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************** *** $140.08 • • R FILARSKY & WATT 00055 001-400-1203-4201 00412 $1,102.50 07054 28758 LEGAL SERV/DEC 88 12/31/88 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 r • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************tt* $1,102.50 • • R FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS 01207 160-400-3102-4309 00330 $236.43 15386 07603 28759 SEWER FEED DOGS 15386 01/03/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 'r • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $236.43 O r R FRANKSONS, INC. 00010 110-400-3302-4311 00435 $640.70 14087 06990 28760 CLOTH DOORS 14087 12/30/88 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE _ $0.00 01/18/89 * s * • err FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY *** R R VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER• TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 -JAN 89 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHGS/DEC-JAN PAGE 0012 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $640.70 00058 001-400-4204-4309 01198 $845.75 01/15/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00058 105-400--2601-4309 00432 $778.98 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE. COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 -0200 $1,624.73 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00194 $5.80 01/01/89 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00195 $6.41 12/31/88 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 01/01/89 00015 12/31/88 00015 01/01/89 001-400-1121-4304 00184 $14.49 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 001-400-1121-4304 00185 $20.09 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 001-400-1131-4201 00452 00124 28761 $0.00 01/19/89 00124 28761 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 $7.25 318-0200 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00119 $212.67 12/31/88 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00187 $11.60 01/01/89 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00188 $11.78 12/31/88 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00202 $13.05 01/01/89 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00203 $15.56 12/31/88 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00207 $48.57 01/01/89 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 r PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R R R R R • R w R R • R R a R • R R r I GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00208 $48.24 12/31/88 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00203 $18.85 01/01/89 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00204 $19.46 12/31/88 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00135 $22.47 01/01/89 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00136 $186.38 12/31/88 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00105 $15.22 01/01/89 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00106 $22.64 12/31/88 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00316 $308.27 01/01/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00318 $567.19 12/31/88 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00142 ' $7.25 01/01/89 FIRE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 12/31/88 FIRE 00143 $167.08 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00192 . $11.60 01/01/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00193 $17.23 12/31/88 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00206 $29.72 01/01/89 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00207 $57.53 12/31/88 PLANNING /TELEPHONE PAGE 0013 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 A FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 —0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JAN 89 —0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 —0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 —0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JAN 89 —0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/DEC 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 01/01/89 001-400-4201-4304 00203 $60.17 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00204 $120.43 12/31/88 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00208 $67.42 01/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00209 $237.53 12/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE PAGE 0014 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00415 $16.94 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00237 $14.49 01/01/89 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00238 $161.43 12/31/88 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00119 $7.25 01/01/89 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00120 $6.59 12/31/88 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 12/31/88 110-400-3301-4304 00097 $11.82 VEH PKG DIST /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00205 $78.29 01/01/89 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00206 $114.05 12/31/88 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00018 $4.16 12/31/88 DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************n********************-a************ R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 $2,766.97 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01267 $1,461.36 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 318-0200 00162 28764 $0.00 01/18/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 01225 28764 $0.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 $0.00 01/19/89 w lir r.� ✓ • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAGE 0015 DATE 01/19/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02623 105-400-2601-4188 00661 33.44 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-3302-4188 00852 399.01 01/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 145-400-3401-4188 00599 310.30 01/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 145-400-3402-4188 01/15/89 ESEA 00597 33. 47 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00021 32.66 01/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00605 35.16 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00055 311.10 01/15/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00056 322.20 01/15/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************gra**** 31, 618. 70 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES PROF SERV/POWER ST 02102 001-210-0000-2110 01401 08/08/88 R HARRIS &. ASSOCIATES WORK GUAR COSTS/21st ST 90101 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES FINAL PMT/SEWER IMPROV 02102 001-210-0000-2110 12/16/88 02629 ' 31, 352.89 8801401 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 02630 31, 829.38 880590101 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 02102 160-400-8405-4201 00021 314,462.88 01/10/89 CIP 85-405 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 317,645.15 R HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE CONTRACT PMT/FY 88-89 60820 001-400-4601-4201 00268 31,725.00 01/12/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 31,725.00 R HERMOSA BEACH YOUTH BASKETBALL CONTRACT PMT/FY 88-89 02647 001-400-4601-4201 00267 31,725.00 01/04/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 00001 28765 30.00 01/19/89 06438 28766 30.00 01/18/89 07651 28766 30.00 01/19/89 07649 28766 30.00 01/19/89 07701 28767 30.00 01/18/89 06600 28768 30.00 01/18/89 r .,a ONO • • i i lb • 4.0 A •, J ar FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * VENDOR TOTAL R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CHGS/DEC 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAGE 0016 DATE 01/19/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00065 001-400-2101-4311 12/31/88 POLICE $1,725.00 00595 $40.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 01228 28769 $0.00 01/18/89 R HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY 00403 001-400-1206-4305 00345 $79.88 10688794 07824 28770 MANUAL/HP1508 PC 88794 12/29/88 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY SYSTEM MAINT/DEC 88 X1U63 P. HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY SYSTEM MAINT/JAN 89 RIU36 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY SOFTWARE SUPP/JAN—MAR 89 D3464 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY COMP TERM MAINT/JAN—MAR P1U61 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY DISC DRIVE/PUB WORKS 38748 $79.88 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00490 $1,223.00 07X1U63 00009 28771 12/02/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 00149 01/04/89 00149 01/04/89 00149 01/04/89 00149 12/21/88 001-400-1206-4201 00491 $1,223.00 32RIU36 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE%PRIVAT 001-400-1206-4201 00492 $2,667.83 7HD3464 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 001-400-1206-4201 00493 $2,172.00 32P1U61 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAF 001-400-4202-5401 00005 $196.22 7H38748 PUB WKS ADMIN /EQUIPMENT—LESS THAN $50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7,482.05 R HOLIDAY INN HOTEL/KENDALL/COOK 02646 001-400-2101-4312 01/09/89 POLICE 00820 $211.80 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $211.80 R HOZIES RADIATOR SERVICE RECORE RADIATOR/MALIBU 95716 00009 28771 $0.00 01/19/89 00032 28771 $0.00 01/18/89 00010 28771 $0.00 01/18/89 07293 28771 $0.00 01/18/89 07499 28772 $0.00 01/18/89 00277 001-400-4204-4311 00109 $123.81 95716 07619 28773 01/04/89 BLDG MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE $123.81 01/18/09 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HYATT REGENCY MONTEREY LODGING/K. NORTHCRAFT TR231 $123.81 01981 001-400-1201-4317 00160 $196.00 TR231 00231 28774 01/15/89 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 01/18/89 FINANCE-5FA340 TIME 13:20:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION e *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JONCICH, STURM & ASSOCIATES PD REMODEL SERVICES 1047 PAGE 0017 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $196. 00 02159 001-400-8606-4201 00062 $3,240.00 1047 07650 28775 12/02/88 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OFCR BONNIE*KENDALL DUI SEM/KENDALL/COOK 02174 001-400-2101-4312 01/09/89 POLICE $3.240 00 00819 $200. 00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE ..POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MICHAEL B.*LABDON CITE PAYMENT REFUND 61868 $200.00 02650 110-300-0000-3302 25245 $25.00 01/11/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REG. /K. NORTHCRAFT TR231 $25. 00 00317 001-400-1201-4317 00161 $155.00 01/15/89 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** P. LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/DEC 88' R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/DEC 88 $155. 00 00167 001-400-3103-4309 00779 $31.58 12/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00167 001-400-4204-4309 01190 $294.52 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00167 001-400-6101-4309 00626 $110.19 12/31/88 PARKS 00167 12/31/88 001-400-8612-4309 00006 CIP 88-612 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $10. 94 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************. R LAW OFF. OF RICHARD A. *LEVINE ATTY FEES/WOLCOTT APPEAL. $447. 23 02649 001-400-1203-4201 00413 $854.99 01/03/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 07498 28776 $0.00 01/18/89 761868 07335 28777 $0.00 01/18/89 TR231 00231 28778 $0.00 01/18/89 01231 28779 $0.00 01/18/89 01231 28779 $0.00 01/18/89 01231 28779 $0.00 01/10/89 01231 28779 $0.00 01/18/89 07053 28780 $0.00 01/18/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY *** R R CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** *************************** LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. MISC CHGS/DEC 88 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. MISC CHGS/DEC 88 PAGE 0018 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5854. 99 00077 001-400-4101-4305 00262 566.89 12/31/88 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00355 339.57 12/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOS ANGELES COUNTY WATER QUAL CLASS/ANTICH 3106. 46 02648 001-400-4202-4316 00126 545.00 01/03/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************#******************** R JAMES P. *LOUGH RETAINER/DEC 88 *** VENDOR TOTAL 345. 00 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00453 53,700.00 . 12/31/88 .CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ******************************************************************** R LOUIS THE TAILOR. INC. MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R LOUIS THE TAILOR. INC. MISC CHGS/DEC Be 33, 700. 00 00079 001-400-2201-4309 00611 386.11 12/31/88 FIRE 00079 001-400-2201-5401 12/31/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00004 3120.29 /EQUIP -LESS THAN 3500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 3206. 40 01859 001-400-1212-4188 01269 3817.59 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 01/15/89 d1859 01/15/89 105-400-2601-4188 00663 327.87 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 110-400-3301-4188 00646 32.74 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 110-400-3302-4188 00854 01/15/89 PARKING ENF 3173. 55 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01233 28781 30.00 01/18/89 01233 28781 30.00 01/18/89 07633 28782 30.00 01/18/89 06661 28783 30.00 01/19/89 01234 28784 30.00 01/18/89 01234 28784 30.00 01/18/89 00041 28785 30.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 30.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 30.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 30.00 01/19/89 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB PT R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01859 01/15/89 145-400-3401-4188 00601 DIAL A RIDE $5. 12 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 145-400-3402-4188 00599 $1.73 01/15/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 145-400-3403-4188 00083 $0.55 01/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 155-400-2102-4188 00293 .$2.29 01/15/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 160-400-3102-4188 00607 $21.93 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 705-400-1209-4188 00056 $2.29 01/15/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 705-400-1217-4188 00057 $4.58 01/15/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *****************************44*****44*4*******4*4*4*4***4*4#****4** R MANERI SIGN CO.. INC. PARKING SIGNS 11 PAGE 0019 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,060.24 01255 001-400-3104-4309 00148 $555.40 7421 01/06/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************************************r****on*** R MANHATTAN FORD MISC CHGS/DEC 88 -JAN 89 R MANHATTAN FORD MISC CHGS/DEC 88 -JAN 89 00605 001-400-3104-4311 00011 01/15/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00605 001-400-4101-4311 00087 01/15/89 PLANNING $555. 40 $8. 68 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $34. 53 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. LEASE PMT/JAN 89 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. LEASE PMT/FEB 89 GIP b2272 001-400-2101-6900 01/15/89 POLICE 02272 001-400-2101-6900 01/15/89 POLICE St $43. 21 00379 $39,843.87 /LEASE PAYMENTS 00380 $1,233.52 /LEASE PAYMENTS N:4 00041 28785 $0.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 $0.00 01/19/89 w 00041 28785 $0.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 $0.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 $0.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 $0.00 01/19/89 00041 28785 $0.00 01/19/89 7421 07630 28786 $0.00 01/18/89 00137 28787 $0.00 01/18/89 00137 28787 $0.00 01/18/89 00057 28788 $0.00 01/18/89 00056 28788 $0.00 01/18/89 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. LEASE PMT/FEB 89 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. LEASE PMT/JAN 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION r 02272 001-400-2101-6900 01/15/89 POLICE 02272 001-400-2101-6900 01/15/89 POLICE 00381 $1,072.55 /LEASE PAYMENTS 00382 $22,657.62 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************** *********** R MOHLE, GROVER & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/DEC 88 8-310 01499 12/31/88 001-400-8176-4201 00004 CIP 86-176 PAGE 0020 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $64,807.56 $418.50 88-310 /CONTRACT SERVICE./PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MONARCH BROOM MISC CHCS/DEC 88 $418.50 00059 28788 $0.00 01/18/89 00063 28788 $0.00 01/19/89 07645 28789 $0.00 01/18/89 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00781 $702.90 6864/6870 0123B 28790 /6870 12/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 $702.90 00091 001-400-1212-4188 01262 $528.00 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R NABER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES JAIL TRNG/S. GARCIA 00656 001-400-2101-4313 12/12/88 POLICE $528.00 00182 $266.43 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R NATIONAL SOC. OF PROF ENGRS DUES/A. ANTICH $266.43 01950 001-400-4202-4315 00033 $150.00 01/03/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R KEVIN B.*NORTHCRAFT MON EXP/JAN 89 $150.00 42064 001-400-1201-4317 00162 $31.00 01/15/89 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 $31.00 00235 001-400-1212-4188 01272 $1,117.39 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00013 $0.00 28791 01/18/89 07493 28792 $0.00 01/18/89 07636 28793 $0.00 01/18/89 06664 28794 $0.00 01/19/89 00019 28795 $0.00 01/19/89 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INNS/FED 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 VENDOR TOTAL R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMP HOOKUP/DEC 88 R PACIFIC DELL TELEPHONE PRISONER LAUNDRY/DEC 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00235 105-400-2601-4188 00665 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING 00235 110-400-3301-4188 00648 01/15/89 VEH PKG DIST 00235 110-400-3302-4188 00857 01/15/89 PARKING ENF 00235 145-400-3401-4188 00604 01/15/89 DIAL A RIDE 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00602 01/15/89 ESEA 00235 155-400-2102-4188 00295 01/15/89 CROSSING GUARD 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00609 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00321 12/31/88 00321 12/31/88 001-400-2101-4304 POLICE 352. 71 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 34. 32 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3339. 67 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30. 58 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0. 29 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 35. 93 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 343. 09 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0021 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 31. 563. 98 00315 3172.28 /TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4306 00596 POLICE 3181. 89 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE. *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************•k****+r***************** R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 1 3354. 1 7 00575 001-400-1212-4188 01268 311,758.92 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00575 01/15/89 00575 01/15/89 00575 01/15/89 105-400-2601-4188 00662 3495.56 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 110-400-3301-4188 00645 VEH PKG DIST 110-400-3302-4188 00853 PARKING 330. 88 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 32, 030. 15 ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 28795 30.00 01/19/89 00019 28795 30.00 01/19/89 00019 28795 30.00 01/19/89 00019 28795 30.00 01/19/89 00019 28795 30.00 01/19/89 00019 28795 30.00 01/19/89 00019 28795 30.00 01/19/89 00036 28796 30.00 01/18/89 00128 28796 30.00 01/18/89 00016 28797 30.00 01/19/89 00016 28797 30.00 01/19/89 00016 28797 30.00 01/19/89 00016 28797 30.00 01/19/89 40 c.► A FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # DATE INVC R PACIFICARE 00575 CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 01/15/89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH 'INS/FED 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 145-400-3401-4188 00600 DIAL A RIDE 00575 145-400-3402-4188 01/15/89 ESEA $7.21 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00598 $2.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00575 145-400-3403-4188 00082 $4.12 01/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00575 155-400-2102-4188 00292 345.37 01/15/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00575 160-400-3102-4188 00606 $355.00 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************+r********************** R PAGENET PAGING SERVICE/JAN 89 14234 01/01/89 POLICE PAGE 0022 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $14,729.27 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00155 $149.50 /RADIO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 3149.50 R PAK WEST 00016 28797 $0.00 01/19/89 00016 28797 30.00 01/19/89 00016 28797 *0.00 01/19/89 00016 28797 *0.00 01/19/89 00016 28797 30.00 01/19/89 90114234 00059 28798 30.00 01/18/89 MISC CHGS/DEC 88 00519 001-400-4204-4309 01192 $109.81 591218/2302 01240 28799 /2302 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************.****.*.q.************************************#**** 3109.81 R OFCR JOSEPH*PELKA MEALS/AIDS CLASS R OFCR JOSEPH*PELKA 00950 001-400-2101-4312 00816 *29.00 01/09/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00950 110-300-0000-3902 00009 $39.20 REIMB BURGLARY LOSS 70745 01/11/89 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $68.20 R POSTMASTER d0398 001-400-1202-4305 00196 $72.00 ANNUAL P.O. BOX RENTAL 728 01/15/89 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/FEB 89 $72.00 00585 001-400-1212-4188 01266 377.25 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 07495 28800 $0.00 01/18/89 70745 07336 28800 $0.00 01/18/89 728 07340 30. 00 28801 01/18/89 00038 28802 30.00 01/18/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R R R R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/FEB 89 PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/FEB 89 PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/FEB 89 PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/FEB 89 PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/FEB 89 PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/FEB 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAGE 0023 DATE 01/19/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00585 105-400-2601-4188 00660 $0.50 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 110-400-3301-4188 00644 $0.50 01/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 110-400-3302-4188 00851 $4.25 01/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 160-400-3102-4188 00604 $1.00 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT'S 00585 705-400-1209-4188 00054 $1.25 01/15/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 705-400-1217-4188 00055 $1.25 01/15/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RADIO SHACK MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R RADIO SHACK MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R RADIO SHACK MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R RADIO SHACK MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R RADIO SHACK MISC CHGS/DEC 88 $86. 00 01429 001-400-1205-4305 00049 $33.35 12/31/88 CABLE TV /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01429 001-400-1206-4309 00115 $33.34 12/31/88 DATA PROCESSING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS . 01429 001-400-2101-4305 00884 • $26.55 12/31/88 210002 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01429 001-400--4204-4309 01194 $9. 52 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01429 110-400-3302-4305 00505 $58.49 12/31/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $161.25 R READICARE MEDICAL GROUP -LAX EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS 17904 R READICARE MEDICAL GROUP -LAX EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS 17673 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00228 12/13/88 PERSONNEL 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00229 12/13/88 PERSONNEL ti $485. 00 /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 00038 28802 $0.00 01/18/89 00038 28802 $0.00 01/18/89 00038 28802 $0. 00 01/18/89 00038 28802 $0.00 01/18/89 00038 28802 $0.00 01/18/89 00038 28802 $0.00 01/18/89 01243 28803 $0.00 01/18/89 01243 28803 $0.00 01/18/89 01243 28803 $0.00 01/18/89 01243 28803 $0.00 01/18/89 01243 28803 $0.00 01/18/89 94-17904 07058 28804 $0.00 01/18/89 $1,509.00 94-17673 07056 28804 /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 01/18/89 40 1.4 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0024 TIME 13:20:33 FOR 01/24/89 DATE 01/19/89 0 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************** * $1, 994. 00 • • • 44 • • r R JIM*ROSENBERGER 01832 001-400-1101-4317 00288 $27.20 06660 28805 MILEAGE/DEC 88 -JAN 89 01/12/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $27. 20 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-4202-4201 00234 $587.50 88457 07642 28806 ENG SERV/DEC 88 88457 01/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $587.50 R SACRAMENTO INN 00990 001-400-2101-4312 00818 $580.00 07497 28807 LODGING/W. VINCENT 01/09/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $500. 00 R SAFETY WEST 00693 001-400-3103-4309 00778 $17.88 17431 07632 28808 GLOVES 17431 01/11/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 R SAFETY WEST 00693 001-400-4204-4309 01189 $17.88 17431 07632 28808 GLOVES 17431 01/11/89 BLDG MAINT ./MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ' $0.00 01/18/89 R SAFETY WEST 00693 105-400-2601-4309 00429 ' $17.89 17431 07632 28800 GLOVES 17431 01/11/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 R SAFETY WEST 00693 160-400-3102-4309 00331 $17.88 17431 07632 28808 GLOVES 17431 01/11/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ETTA*SIMPSON MON EXP/JAN 89 01961 01/15/89 001-400-1101-4317 00289 $71. 53 $15. 00 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15. 00 06662 28809 $0.00 01/19/89 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01191 $96.74 25-79656 01246 28810 MISC CHGS/DEC 88 79656 12/31/80 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 P FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0025 FOR 01/24/89 DATE 01/19/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP * * * VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************************************** a $96.74 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2101-4305 00881 $69.75 MISC CHGS/DEC 88 12/31/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01247 28811 $0.00 01/18/89 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-4601-4305 00598 388.34 01247 28811 MISC CHCS/DEC 88 12/31/88 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************-**************************************************•***** $158. 09 R SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER, INC. 02250 001-400-2101-4201 00342 $36.22 275 07494 28812 DEC 88 SERVICES 275 01/04/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $36.22 R SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS, INC. 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00343 $1,110.00 1193-94/97-98 07492 28813 BACKGROUND INVEST 97-98 01/04/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1, 110. 00 R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2201-4309 00612 $66.03 MISC CHCS/DEC 88 12/31/88 FIRE 01248 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************* $66.03 28814 01/18/89 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300--0000-3302 25244 3138.00 07826 28815 CITATION DAIL 01/12/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $138.00 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHCS/DEC 883 INV 00018 001-400-2201-4309 12/31/88 FIRE 00610 $20.77 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 001-400-3103-4309 00780 $93.01 12/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 105-400-2601-4309 00430 $12.75 12/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01251 28816 $0.00 01/18/89 01251 28816 $0.00 01/18/89 01251 28816 $0.00 01/18/89 w i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAY VENDOR NAME. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R SOUTHERrr (:,',I iFI;ttH LP /SON CO. ELEC DILLS/DF t: PP R SOt1THI HN C:',l. [F i- ra1 , EDISON CO. EI_Et: 1) I; LS/I)EC 88 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISOr' W. ELEC BILLS/DEC 88 R 9OUTHChi i,.^,I 'r'WNIA EDISON ELEC DILLS/DT,: R SOUTHERN CALif Oltl II , F-PfS0N CO. ELEC DILLS/DEC 88 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC DILLS/DEC };0 PAGE 0026 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 8126. 53 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00024 8168.76 12/31/88 MEnIANS /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00012 8577.74 12/71/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00280 $6,618 21 12/31/88 BLDC MAINT •/UTILITIES CO. 00159 On1-400-6101-4303 12/31/88 PARKS 00233 $1.209.21 /UTILITIES 00159 105-400-2601-4303 001/0 8511.71 12/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIIS 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00093 872..03 12/31/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILI'TIES *** VENDOR TOTAL. ******i,*4u*1*-****************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. LEASE PMT/FED 99 $9,157.66 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00169 814,715.67 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************************************4*** 814,715.67 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. • GAS DILLS/DEC 88 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00279 81,221.27 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/NOV 88 40419 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/NOV 08 84733 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/NOV 88 46779 00146 001-400-2101-4305 11/30/88 POLICE 31, 221. 2.7 01252 28817 #0.00 01/19/89 01252 28817 30.0:: 01/19/89 n` �2 28817 00 01/19/89 01 is 29017 $0.0u 01/19/89 01252 28817 $0.00 01/19/89 01252 28817 80.00 01/19/89 00013 $0.00 01253 30. 00 28818 01/18/89 28819 01/18/89 00883 819.95 1140419 00033 28820 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 80.00 01/18/89 00146 001-400-4204-4201 00296 11/30/88 BLDG MAINT 86.65 1184733 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00146 001-400-4601-4305 00599 816.05 11/30/88 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00033 28820 80.00 01/18/89 1146779 00033 28820 80.00 01/18/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ttt *********•it#tt#*ttit***********tt**tttt##tt****** itt****#*tt*tt#teitit******** *tttt VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0027 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $42.65 R SPIDELL SPECIALTIES 01238 001-400-4601-4308 00148 $72.42 TROPHIES/SAND & STRAND 0015 01/11/89 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS tttttt VENDOR TOTAL***********tt**********************•***********************tt********** R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 88 R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 88 R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 88 R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 88 R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 88 00707 001-300-0000-3901 12/31/88 $72.42 00020 $372.00 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 00707 001-400-1206-4201 00495 $47.00 12/31/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00707 001-400-1206-4305 00346 $32.00 12/31/88 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00707 001-400-4201-4305 00382 $3.00 12/31/83 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00707 110-400-3302-5401 00028 $13.00 12/31/88 PARKING ENF /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************ti***********ti********************** $467.00 R RICHARD*SULLIVAN ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 67917 02645 001-210-0000-2110 01/11/89 0015 07704 28821 $0.00 01/18/89 07339 28822 $0.00 01/18/89 07339 28822 $0.00 01/18/89 07339 28822 $0.00 01/18/89 07339 28822 $0.00 01/18/89 07339 28822 $0.00 01/18/89 02627 $50.00 67917 07147 28823 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/18/89 *tttt VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R TIME BUSINESS FORMS PRINT SERV/PERSONNEL 39534 01516 001-400-1203-4305 00185 12/13/88 PERSONNEL $260.93 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************tat****tt************************* $260.93 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY PARKING METER PIPES MI 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00627 12/31/88 PARKS 00124 110-400-3302-4309 00501 06398 12/06/88 PARKING ENF $228.78 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 39534 07039 28824 $0.00 01/18/89 01257 28825 $0.00 01/18/89 $282.92 906398 06985 28825 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/18/89 1 W 4 • • • • • • I 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ***** ****************4*********************************** ********** R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/FED 89 PAGE 0020 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $511.70 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01265 $173.88 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 105-400-2601-4188 00659 $1.52 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 110-400-3301-4188 00643 $7.05 01/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 110-400-3302-4188 00850 $10.58 01/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3401-4188 00598 $0.94 01/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3402-4188 01/15/89 ESEA 00596 $0. 38 . /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 155-400-2102-4188 00291 $1.76 01/15/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 002.40 160-400-3102-4188 00603 $3.04 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL***tttt*****atr#*ntt#*tFtt***#arx###**tr****+r**#a+r*****#***********tc***#tr** R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/DEC 88 00123 001-400-2101-4305 00886 12/31/88 POLICE 00123 001-400-2201-4309 00615 12/31/88 FIRE 00123 12/31/88 00123 12/31/88 00123 12/31/88 001-400-2401-4309 00088 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-400-3103-4309 00782 ST MAINTENANCE 001-400-3104-4309 00152 TRAFFIC SAFETY $199. 15 $61. 33 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $119.83 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $23. 91 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $29. 16 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $28. 97 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 00029 28826 $0.00 01/18/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHGS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/DEC 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/DEC 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 PAGE 0029 DATE 01/19/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00123 001-400-4204-4309 01199 12/31/88 BLDG MAINT $672.41 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00123 001-400-6101-4309 00628 $76.34 12/31/88 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00123 001-400-8612-4309 00007 $3.82 12/31/88 CIP 88-612 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00123 12/31/88 105-400-2601-4309 00431 $36.67 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00123 110-400-3302-4305 00507 $30.12 12/31/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* R TSA, INC. HP WORD TERMINAL $1.082.56 02642 001-400-1206-5401 00001 $310.25 2928 12/16/88 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 I $310.25 02355 001-400-1212-4188 01263 $708.11 01/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 105-400-2601-4188 00658 • $24.68 01/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 110-400-3301-4188 00642 $1.80 01/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 110-400-3302-4188 00849 $134.73 01/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 145-400-3401-4188 00597 $0.99 01/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 145-400-3402-4188 00595 $0.32 01/15/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 145-400-3403-4188 00080 $0.49 01/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 01258 28827 $0.00 01/19/89 2928 06996 28828 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 y • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 • ri • 0 0 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/FEB 89 VND # DATE INVC 02355 01/15/89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/24/89 ACCOUNT NUMBER • TRN # AMOUNT PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 155-400-2102-4188 00290 CROSSING GUARD 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00602 01/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $2.05 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $19.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************* ********************** R UNION METAL CORPORATION MARBELITE ST. LITE POLES 28078 PAGE 0030 DATE 01/19/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $892.37 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00028 28829 $0.00 01/18/89 00405 105-400-8202-4201 00020 314,506.55 128078 06800 28830 12/30/88 CIP 85-202 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 214.506.55 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** VASEK POLAK SUBARU SUBARU PARTS 814. 506. 55 01387 001-400-2401-4311 00128 $925.77 r 16103 01/10/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $925.77 • R OFCR WILLIAM*VINCENT NARC INVEST COURSE 02251 001-400-2101-4312 01/09/89 POLICE 00817 $332.25 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • $332.25 R JUNE*WILLIAMS 01507 001-400-1101-4317 00290 $15.00 MON EXP/JAN 89 01/15/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15.00 • • • • • • • R STEVE*WISNIEWSKI REIMB EXPENSES 01364 170-400-2103-4322 00003 $474.00 01/11/89 SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R XEROX CORPORATION MAINT SERV/OCT-DEC 88 R XEROX CORPORATION EXCESS METER USE/JUN-DEC 00706 8474. 00 60135 001-400-1206-4201 00494 $525.00 01/03/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00135 01/03/89 001-400-1208-4201 00510 GEN APPROP a 16103 07820 28831 $0.00 01/18/89 $487.09 019300706 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 07496 28832 $0.00 01/18/89 06663 28833 $0.00 01/19/89 07491 28834 $0.00 01/18/89 00045 28835 $0.00 01/18/89 07333 28835 $0.00 01/18/89 0 • • • s • i • • s FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:20:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0031 FOR 01/24/89 DATE 01/19/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*+F********************************* ******************* F************ $1, 012. 09 R ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 01206 001-400-3104-4309 00149 $668.28 8367/8372 07627 28836 PARKING SIGNS /8372 .01/03/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $668.29 01/18/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** I $668.28 $223.171.39 $784.100.08 1 HUBBY CERTIFY THAT 714f: t)L t, WS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS L "�/INCLUSIVE OF THE __ARC ACCURATE S LI.; ED UN I A., , .. T WARRANT R7.S;3TER r.•R/�� AND FIIrNS ' ; I .A13!.'. f :Sf ; „�... BY !C _ FINANCEI)J�11 t4 ftA 1UR DATE j� ■ January 17, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of January 24, 1989 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Adjourned Meeting - January 31, 1989 Right- of -way financing Joint session w/Planning Commission February 14, 1989 Resolution concurring with County Hazardous Waste Management Plan Acceptance of work as complete and final for Police Department remodel, first floor CIP 87-606 Responsible Agent City Manager City Mgr./Planning Dir. Building Director Public Works Director Status report on Employer -Employee Organization Relations Resolution Personnel Director Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to bid for Commun- ity Center fire detection system (CIP 88-604) Public Works Director Acceptance of work as complete - Bicycle path repairs (CIP 87-165) Public Works Director Kiwanis tree lot report Community Resources Dir. Monthly Investment Report - January City Treasurer Aviation Blvd. traffic Safety review Public Works Director Monterey speed limit Public Works Director Draft Audit Finance Administrator Sidewalk inventory and maintenance Public Works Director Municipal Matters Annual report of Activities - 1988 City Manager - 1 - 4. Mid -year Budget Review February 28, 1989 Revenue and Expenditure reports - January City Treasurer Report - January Trash enclosure enforcement Resolution on green, yellow and white zones March 14, 1989 RFP for audit firm Resolution ordering preparation of report - Street Lighting District Resolution ordering preparation of report - Crossing Guards District Accept Community Center air condi- tioning as complete CIP 88-610 Award Pier Storm Damage Repair contract CIP 88-614 March 28, 1989 Accept slurry seal as complete CIP 87-170 Accept traffic signal improvements as complete CIP 85-138 April 25, 1989 Street Lighting District Assessment a) Resolution b) Resolution Crossing Guard a) Resolution b) Resolution approving report setting public hearing District Assessment approving report setting public hearing July, 25, 1989° Review of City Goals CM/ACM/Fin. Finance Administrator City Treasurer Building Director Public Works Director Finance Administrator Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared RFP for cost allocation plan Contract for 1988-1989 audit Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium Adoption of Uniform Fire, Building and Plumbing Codes Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location Report on County HWMP final draft Accept Highland Ave. as complete Accept Pier repair damage as complete Presentation of OTS report Award traffic signal pre-emption contract Award contract Community Center smoke detection Finance Administrator Finance Administrator City Clerk General Services Director Planning Director Planning Director Public Safety/Building Public Safety Director City Attorney Building Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director ***************************************************************** CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - DECEMBER 1988 FUND NUMBER 001 105 110 115 120 125 126 127 130 140 145 150 155 160 170 180 705 GENERAL 12/1/88 ACCOUNT BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 12/31/88 BALANCE TRUST ACCOUNTS GENERAL $2,215,831.45 LIGHTING DISTRICT 1,127,587.77 PARKING 202,379.80 STATE GAS TAX 324,195.87 COUNTY GAS TAX 34,987.56 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 492,774.96 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 478,101.31 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 39,238.61 REVENUE SHARING 13,843.88 CDBG -0- PROPOSITION A FUND 253,349.25 GRANT FUND 63,536.53 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 1,938.00 SEWER MAINTENANCE POLICE ASSET SEIZURE FIRE PROTECTION FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND 1,259,572.99 219,016.81 103,150.51 771,632.59 $7,601,137.89 $1,453,572.24 $152,823.04 $688,780.99 148,088.51 3,354.38 8,638.68 136,179.16 602.05 74,655.27 22,935.13 38,263.43 33,656.85 - 0- 104.08 -0- 66,505.00 1,465.92 1,055.41 61,660.64 7,419.69 -0- 92,490.96 9,112.86 -0- -0- 41.18 -0- - 0- -0- -0- 19,335.00 753.67 18,688.09 - 0- 7,663.31 -0- 29,934.76 5.77 4,906.88 4,635.49 70,439.02 11,796.54 701.25 651.54 -0- 30,202.59 4,471.86 -0- - 0- 18,454.48 6,933.82 $2,066,240.73 $315,626.28 $ 849,112.53 $ 58,931.54 773.37 120,768.92 6,355.00 - 0- - 0- - 0- 86,829.00 3,250.00 - 0- -0- 7.15 375.00 32,752.54 5,525.00 - 0- 58.76 $315,626.28 $3,074,514.20 1,269,618.61 143,736.82 345,382.58 35,091.64 559,690.47 547,181.64 54,013.43 10,635.06 -0- 254,749.83 71,192.69 26,596.65 1,290,098.42 214,844.60 137,824.96 783,094.49 $8,818,266.09 BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE STATEMENT BALANCE PAYROLL $8,260,972.05 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $285,870.01 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $ 2,213.06 $504,047.90 $503,253.21 $3,007.75 p /1L/)( GARY BRUT H, I TREASURE JANUARY 19, 1989 GENERAL $ 607,709.43 PAYROLL 5,178.11 612,887.54 52,585.75 560,301.79 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 8,260,972.05 8,821,273.84 OUTSTANDING CHECKS BALANCE January 17, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 24, 1989 REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRE-EMPTION Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize staff to advertise for construction bids for the Traffic Signal Pre-emption Project known as CIP 86-176 and issue Addenda as necessary. Background: Emergency vehicle right-of-way pre-emption devices are proposed to be installed on traffic signals at the following intersections: Pacific Coast Highway and Second Street Pacific Coast Highway and Fifth Street Pacific Coast Highway and Eighth Street Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation Blvd. Pacific Coast Highway and Pier Avenue Pacific Coast Highway and Twenty First Street This project is included in the FY 88-89 Budget. Analysis: Plans, Specifications and a detailed Engineer's Estimate have been prepared by Mohle, Grover and Associates. They are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. The estimated cost of the project is $37,100.00. Traffic signal pre-emption devices allow emergency police and fire vehicles to "pre-empt" traffic signals giving them the "green light" as they approach the intersection. Similar devices have been installed within the neighboring cities at Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach. The pre-emption devices would be compatible in all three cities. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 17, 1989 Page 2 Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Drop this project. 2. Modify the project scope.' Respectfully submitted, Anthony Antich Director of Publi ' Works Concur: Kevin Northcraf.t City Manager Steve Wisniewski Public Safety Director December 13, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 24, 1988 RESOLUTION LISTING ALL EXISTING ONE WAY STREETS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , a resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach establishing sections of certain streets throughout the City as one-way. • Background: As part of the Department's on-going review it was determined that an update of Resolution NS 2435 is necessary. Resolution NS 2435 defines and establishes traffic control throughout the City. Traffic Control Status of Review 1. Stop Intersections Completed 2. One-way Streets Completed 3. Through Streets In Progress 4. No Parking Areas Not Complete 5. No Stopping Zones 6. One Hour Parking Limit Zones -Streets 7. Fifteen Minute Parking Zones -Streets 8. Twelve Hour Limit Parking -Streets 9. Right-of-way Prohibited to Vehicles 10. No Parking During School Hours 11. Loading Zones The stop sign review has been completed and approved by City Council. The other sections of Resolution NS 2435 need additional review and as work is completed staff will present the results. Analysis: The analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. Resolution NS 2435 - One-way Streets 2. Engineering Review 3. Sign Maintenance - 1 - if 4. Fiscal Impact 5. Summary 1. Resolution NS 2435 - One-way Streets NOTE: No NEW one-way streets are being proposed Resolution NS 2435 was first approved by the City Council on July 3, 1962. This resolution is governed by Ordinance NS 238 which was adopted by City Council on June 6, 1962. A search of the records and files in the City revealed that the list of one-way streets within Resolution NS 2436, hasnever been updated. There exists no complete resolution listing all existing one-way street locations. A complete listing of one-way streets is necessary for the efficient operation of both office and field crews, reduced potential liability and proper upkeep of city records. 2. Engineering Review A field inventory was performed and there are 14 existing streets or portion of, that are designated one-way streets. There are 77 existing signs indicating one-way, each intersection was evaluated according to recognized policy of the State of California for one-way street sign placement. During the engineering review inconsistencies in signage were discovered. To comply with the recognized policy, 43 additional one-way signs are required. 3. Sign Maintenance Future sign maintenance cost will be greater. The number of signs in the city will govern the amount of sign maintenance. Hence, with a larger number of one-way street signs in the City, a greater amount of time and money will be needed to properly maintain the signs. 4. Fiscal Impact No addition appropriation is necessary to complete this work. 5. Summary - All existing one-way streets were inventoried No new one-way streets are being proposed - One-way streets were evaluated for proper There is a need for 43 additional one-way existing one-way street. - The proposed one-way sign placement meets of the State of California. signage signs on the recognized policy Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by Staff: 1. Do nothing, thereby increasing potential liability 2. Modify the one-way street list 3. Modify the number of one-way street signs Respectfully submitted: Gary Keaton Engineering Technician Concur: (004A(1 Anthony Anti.ch Director of Pu ,i lic Works 1 evin B. Northcraft City Manage Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety Attachments: - Map and List of Existing One-way Streets - Resolution No. 89- , Establishing One-way Streets (to be adopted by City Council) ows pwadmin EXHIBIT I STREET FROM TO DIRECTION NORTH OF SOUTH ONE-WAY EAST WEST IST STREET BARNEY COURT PROSPECT X 1ST PLACE PROSPECT BARNEY X BARNEY CT. 1ST PLACE 1ST STREET X 2ND STREET PROSPECT 157' EAST OF P.C.H X 3RD STREET P.C.H. PROSPECT X 8TH STREET PROSPECT 240' EAST OF P.C.H. X 4TH STREET MONTEREY CULPER COURT X PALM DRIVE LYNDEN STREET 35TH STREET X 29TH STREET INGLESIDE MANHATTAN AVE X BEACH DRIVE 2ND STREET 24TH STREET X VALLEY DRIVE 2ND STREET HERONDO X 11TH COURT BEACH DRIVE HERMOSA AVE. X 24TH STREET BEACH DRIVE HERMOSA AVE. X CULPER CT. 4TH STREET 2ND STREET X ows1 pwadmin TYPICAL ONE-WAYLSTREET MITERS -ELT -ION Ativ\-3No > 1 3 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SECTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS AS ONE-WAY WHEREAS, Section 19-52 of Ordinance 238 (Traffic Code) 4II provides that City Council, by Resolution, establish one-way 5 streets; 6 WHEREAS, an engineering review has been performed. 7II WHEREAS, the section titled "One-way Streets" of Resolution 8 N.S. 2435 needs updating. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, as a result of the engineering review there is a need for additional one-way street signage, and THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Rescind the one-way street section from resolution No. 2435 and creating a new resolution of one-way streets Exhibit I, attached and establishing additional one-way street signs where required throughout the City. SECTION 2. Staff is directed to install one-way street signs according to this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 26 / 27 / 28 / • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAILI[FORNIIA LEGEND EXISTING ONE-WAY STREET SIONS PROPOSED ONE-WAY STREET SIGNS 13 SCALE: I INCH•400 FEET plrn =lorUU 471all. -11,4 !IRV moo 10101101.111101"111 1111 &&&&& 1 /111 111 Doc,,,1 ..... • 1111111111111111 OP** OLJ JJL]W BrainII Jigs or' bins lid =dB. BM MR MI6 MN low INN a NI I _ • .• • • ...L.'s Vatigge. .1804188 gol*,2 Mil MN I. M. MEI laMMIE I' 0.• • . • _ le January 18, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council January 24, 1989 APPROVAL OF STATE GRANT FUND PROJECTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission that the City Council approve the purchase of the following items from the remaining fund balances in the miscellaneous state grants the City is in the process of closing out: $ 1,000 1,000 20 658 $22,658 BACKGROUND park water fountains park trasn cans playground equipment At the last City Council meeting the City Council received and filed a report that detailed the remaining monies in the various grants the City is closing out. That agenda item is attached for your reference. ANALYSIS The Commission at their January 4, 1989 Special Meeting decided on the above recommendation. The Commission at that same meeting also decided to recommend to the Council the demolition of the old Prospect School. The funds to be used for that demolition ($7,958) is an amount that also remains in one of the grants the City is in the process of closing out. Since the City Council rejected the recommendation of the Commission there remains the $7,958 to appropriate. The Commission meets the day after this Council meeting to determine that and will return to the City Council in February with that recommendation. Once the City Council approves tnese projects the City must file an amendment with the state for each of tnese grants to change the scope of each project. All of tnese remaining funds and all paperwork must be concluded and into the State no later than June 30, 1989. For the past several years the City has spent very little for playground equipment and this funding provides an opportunity to fill a need without using the General Fund. Concur: Kevin B. Northcrraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Alana Mastrian-Handman Assistant City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator ig December 28, 1988 C7/714 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of January 10, 1989 of the City Council FINAL REPORT ON STATE GRANTS RECONCILIATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND At the Council meeting of May 24, 1988, the City Council approved an appropriation of $7,000 for a consultant to reconcile the outstanding recreation grants that were still pending with the state. The attached report from the consultant is the final wrap-up report regarding that work. ANALYSIS In closing out the grants the consultant was able to determine the City expended its own funds to carry out some of these projects and will now be reimbursed for those expenditures. The City will be receiving approximately $42,000 from the state as reimbursement funds. Additionally, the City has some money remaining in the various grants and tnat amounts to approximately $30,000. Tne $30,000 needs to be expended and all paper work submitted to the State no later than June 30, 1989. Elsewhere on the agenda this evening, there is a recommendation before you -.to demolish the old ProspectAvenue Scnool at Fort Lots o' Fun Park on Prospect Avenue. The funds to be used for that demolition ($7,958) are a part of the $30,000 figure mentioned above. By the City Council hiring a consultant at a cost of $7,000 to close out these recreation grants, the City was able to recoup approximately $42,000 from the State and has been informed it has another $30,000 left to expend for park and recreation purposes. It appears the City has received a very good return on that $7,000 expenditure. Concur: Kevin B. Nortncraft City Manager 1 Respectfully submitted, Alana Mastrian-Ha`ndman Assistant City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator ig December 6, 1988 Ms. Alana Mastrian Assistant City Manager Director, Development of Community Resourses City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 SUBJECT: Progress Report on State Parks & Recreation Grant Close-outs Dear Alana: This letter is to provide you and the City with a brief progress report on the status of the close-out activities of the City's State Park and Recreation Grants. We started with nine projects that represented a total of $229,890.00 in funding. Of this total, the City had to establish documentation to justify the $154,364 they had already received from the State, and provide documentation to receive the $75,526.00, that is still available. Some of the projects have been completed and the close-out documents submitted to the State. The remaining projects have funding available and are being programed for expenditure by June 30, 1989. The following are the projects t(at have been closed -out and the documentation submitted to the State. Grant Previously Amount Project Amount Drawn -Down Due City BG -19-013 $12,219.00 $12,219.00 $ -0- BG-19-378 19,323.00 17,400.00 1,923.00 BG -19-553 4,765.00 4,228.50 536.50 BE -19-682 14,238.00 12,814.00 1,424.00 BE -19-857 1,011.00 674.00 910.00 The following are the projects that still have funds remaining and are being reprogramed for expenditures prior to June 30, 1989. With the exception of BE -19- 721, all of the projects have had funds expended. These expenditures, to date, have been compiled and will be combined with the reprogramed funds when they are spent. MARK BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 505 N. Tustin Avenue, .Suite 282, Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 550-0390 Ms. Alana Mastrian December 6, 1988 Page Two Grant Expended Amount Remaining Project Amount To Date To Be Expended 19-0019 $57,958.00 $50,000.00 $ 7,958.00 76-19026 60,025.00 51,781.00 8.244.00 80-19019 58,243.00 45,937.00 12,306.00 BE -19-721 2,108.00 -0- 2,108.00 There is nothing else to be done under our contract until the City is ready to close-out the projects that have the remaining funds. All of the close-out documents have to be submitted to the State prior to June 30, 1989. Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., has enjoyed working with you and the rest of the City staff on this project. We are pleased that we were able to come up with the documentation that will enable the City to both retain the funds received and also receive the funds still due. If you have any questions, or if problems should arise concerning the projects, please give me a call. Sincerely, BryonGK. Baron Senior Vice President BKB:ajy ✓' cc: ..Kevin Northcraft City Manager Vicki Copeland Finance Administrator Hermosa/120688 Mayor and Members of the City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES January 17, 1989 City Council Meeting January 24, 1989 The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: Toya Jackson - 11409 Oxford Avenue, Hawthorne, Ca 90250 Filed January 9, 1989; alleged trip and fall. Paul Haase - 1600 Ardmore Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Filed December 29, 1988; alleged police brutality. Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator. Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. Concur: EVIN B. NORTHC$AFT, City Manager KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk lh ib 3Y MAIL TO: City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 f1/ 1-)L/`: d - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . K fl'`r" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES To Person or Property Name of Claimant: Paul Haase 1600 Ardmore, #306 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 372-7351 Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Date of Accident: Tune: Place: TOOMEY, ARTIANO & WOHN c/o Steven E. Wohn 2615 - 190th Street, Ste. 200 Redondo Beach, CA 90278 (213) 543-1240 10/14/88 11:20 P.M. 1600 Ardmore, #306 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars: (1) Hermosa Beach police allegedly received calls regarding an altercation in apartment #306, above address; (2) Apparently police broke down the door and entered the apartment, allegedly male (Paul Haase) was attaching a female (K. Haase) in the bathroom; police officer or officers at scene grabbed Haase, at which time an alter- cation ensued; officers involved were Eckert and Kendall. Were police at scene? Yes Police Report No.: DR# 88-4437 Age: 25 29 What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or damage if known: (1) Failure to enter under proper authority; (2) Failure to verbally request that claimant exit bathroom (of his own home) to discuss incident with them; (3) Police brutality at scene on this date, consisting of ex- cessively rough treatment such as beating, smashing victims head, punching and other physical acts in order to restrain allegedly resisting claimant. Give total amount of claim. (Include estimated amount of any prospective injury or damage). (1) Unknown; Damages were personal, both physical and psychological and their extent has not been determined. (2) Medical Expenses: $139.25(+); unknown if further; (3) Restitution: Damage to real property unknown; (4) Legal Fees: Unknown How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific, List doctor bill, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.): PLEASE ATTACH TWO ESTIMATES and PHOTOGRAPHS, if available. (1) Not available given lack of definite computation of damages. (2) Photographs available upon request and payment of costs. List name and addresses of witnesses, doctors and hospitals: (1) Paul Haase 1600 Ardmore, #306 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (2) Kristen Haase 1600 Ardmore, #306 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (3) AMI - South Bay Hospital File No: 41427 Los Angeles, CA 90074 Insurance payments, if any, and names of all Insurance Companies with which you are presently insured and type of policy: Not applicable at this time. 2 Expenditures made on account of accident or injury: N/A at this time. Date Item Amount I have read the foregoing claim and know the contents thereof; and I certify that the same is true and my own knowledge except as to those matters which are herein stated upon my information and belief; and as to those matters I believe it to be true. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. / 1 DATE: /?_.-z.?_- F S (1109) 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THALER & THALER 4145 South Sepulveda Boulevard Culver City, California 90230 (213) 870-3707 Attorney for Claimants 4 / •4\ w • ��\ TOYA JACKSON ) NOTICE OF CLAIM PURSUANT Against ) TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 910, et seq. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) The undersigned claimant hereby makes a claim against the City of Hermosa Beach in the sum of $1,000,000.00 and in support of said claim, represents as follows: 1. Claimant's name and post office address are: Toya Jackso,11409 Oxford Avenue, Hawthorne, Ca. 90250 /// 2. All notices should be sent to claimant's attorney, THALER & THALER, A Law Corporation, 4145 S. Sepulveda Boulevard, Culver City, California 90230. Telephone (213) 390-7573. 3. Date, Place and Time of occurrence: July 30, 1988 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 at 9 P.M. on the public walkway in front of 3212 and/or 3216 The Strand, City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles. 4. Description of occurrence: Claimant tripped and fell on broken cable box cover on the public walkway in front of 3212 and/or 3216 The Strand, City of Hermosa Beach. 5. Description of injuries and other damages: Not yet ascertained. 6. Name of public employee or agency causing the injury, damage or loss, if known: City of Hermosa Beach. 7. Basis of computation of claim: Not yet ascertained. Dated: January 6, 1989 Irwin Thaler Attorney for Claimant January 17, 1989 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL January 24, 1989 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #19555 (C.U.P. CON NO. 88-9) LOCATION: 803 LOMA DRIVE APPLICANT: JEROME OLGUIN/RALPH RUTHERFORD REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Tract Map #19555 which is con- sistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed. to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #19555 at their June 7, 1988 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. Respiful submitted, An ew Pe ea Michael Schubach Associate Planner Planning Director (4-4."7;//1- evin B. Nort.hcraft City Manager T/srfinmap —I - 1i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP #19555 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 803 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on January 24, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. This project will.. not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 88-44, adop- ted after public hearing on June 7, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Tract Map #19555 it 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 9, Block "A", Tract No. 1677, as recorded in Book 20, Page 184 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 803 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/rsfinmap CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c RESOLUTION P.C. 88-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #19555 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 803 LOMA DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE LOT 9, BLOCK "A", TRACT 1677. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 7, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. The map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans: B. The site is zoned R-3 and is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed development; C. The subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; D. The subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by .the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; E. Design of the proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan, and is compatible with the immediate environment; F. The project will conform to all zoning and condominium criteria and will be compatible with neighboring residential properties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, Califiornia does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Parcel Map #19555 for a 2 -unit condominium project at 803 Loma Drive subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans; any modifications shall be submittted to the Planning Director for approval. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The project shall meet all requirements of .the condominium Ordinance. a. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions in compliance with the Condominium Ordinance shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. b. Proof of recordation of approved CC&R's shall be submitted to the Planning Director six (6) months after recordation of the Final Map. c. Requirements of Section 7.2-6(G) shall be shown on structural plans and reviewed at the time of Building Department Plan Check. 3. There shall be compliance with all requirements of the Public Wotks Department and Fire Department. 4. Three (3) copies of a landscaping plan indicating size, type, and quantity of plant materials shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and •approval prior. to the issuance of building permits. a. An automated landscape sprinkler system shall be . provided, and shall be shown on plans. 5. Elevations shall be as shown on submitted plans; any modifications shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 6. Revised plans shall identify the location of trash and storage areas. 7. Any satellite dish and/or similar equipment shall comply with the requirements of Section 1227 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Three (3) copies of plans, indicating site, elevation, floor and landscape plans, which are consistent with the conditions of approval of this Conditional Use Permit, shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to issuance of any Building Permits. 9. An "Acceptance of Conditions" form shall be executed and submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 10. The Conditional Use Permit shall be null and void one and a half years from the date of approval unless building permits have been obtained and approval of the vesting tentative tract map shall become null and void twenty-four months from the date of approval unless the map is finaled. The applicant may apply in writing for an extension of time to the Planning Commission prior to the date of expiration. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ingell,Peirce,Rue NOES: None ABSTAIN: Chmn.Compton ABSENT: Comm.DeBellis CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-44 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, Californ'a at their regular meeting of June 7, 1988. . Date a/pers803 6 Michael Schubach, Secretary January 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 24, 1989 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PIER STORM DAMAGE - CIP 88-614 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. approve the plans and specifications for Pier Storm Damage, CIP 88-614; 2. authorize staff to advertise for construction bids for this project; 3. authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations, and 4. adopt the attached resolution to be eligible for funding from the Wildlife Conservation Board. Background: At the August 23, 1988 meeting, City Council awarded an agreement for engineering services to assess pier damage resulting from the January 17, 1988 storm to Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers for an amount not to exceed $21,000. On November 22, 1988, City Council awarded an agreement for design services to Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for the repair of the municipal pier for an amount not to exceed $16,800. The work involves moving the end pile cap (which is now shifted) back to items original position and reconnecting it. In addition, the five piles with cracks will be repaired with epoxy and concrete collars will be placed around two of the piles with the worst cracks. Analysis: The plans and specifications prepared by Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers are complete (available for review in the City Clerk's office) and are ready to go out to bid. Staff has reviewed the plans and specifications and found them to meet the necessary requirements. - 1 - Fiscal Impact: Below is an estimate of project costs: FUNDING DISTRIBUTION Total Cost Preliminary Engineering $ 17,500 Design 16,800 Construction 85,650 Inspection 20,000 Subtotal $139,950 Contingency 13,996 Total $153,946 State Wildlife FEMA City Fund $ -0- $17,500 $ -0- 10,500 6,300 -0- 64,238 10,706 10,706 15,000 2,500 2,500 $89,738 $37,006 $13,206 -0- 6,998- 6,998 $89,738 $44,004 $20,204 The Wildlife Conservation Board of the Department of Fish and Game is willing to share non -FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) costs with the City on a matching basis. Staff has asked the board to set aside $30,000 to cover any potential cost overrun. The Board has a financial interest in the Pier as it provided funding when the Pier was built in 1965. Currently an agreement is in effect until August 20, 2003 with the State of California for the maintenance of the Pier. The Board can only fund on a matching basis with City funding; matching with funds from other State agencies is not allowed. The Office of Emergency Services of the State of California cannot provide State disaster funding since the Pier is recreational and not primarily commercial. Actual funds required will be determined after construction bids and inspection proposals have been received. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Modify the scope of work. This would delay the project, since the project would have to be re -designed. This could potentially jeopardize FEMA reimbursement as all work must be complete by June 27, 1989. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Brian Gengle`r Anony Antich Assistant Engineer Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachments: Resolution Construction Schedule BG:mv psd/pwadmin Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE WILD- LIFE CONSERVATION BOARD FOR REPAIR OF THE MUNICIPAL FISHING PIER WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach and the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) of the State Department of Fish and Game developed the Hermosa Beach Fishing Pier on a 50-50 matching fund basis in 1965 under the WCB Public Fishing Pier Program, and WHEREAS, said pier has suffered storm damage and repair is urgently needed in order that the public may continue to enjoy sport fishing and other recreation on the pier in safety, WHEREAS, the major portion of said repair costs will be reimbursed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach requests that the WCB allocate funds for local cost of the repair which the City will match on an equal basis, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach go on record in favor of the repair of the Hermosa Beach Fishing Pier on a matching fund basis with the Wildlife Conservation Board to cover non -Federal costs, and be it further RESOLVED, that the City of Hermosa Beach agrees that the City will continue its present Lease and Operating Agreement with the State for its full term, and the Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach is hereby authorized to sign any agreements or amendments necessary to carry out such pier repairs or continue the City's pier operations and maintenance, and be it further RESOLVED, that the WCB be advised that the City of Hermosa Beach will cooperate fully with the project as described, and 7 9 10 11 APPROVED AS T ORM: 12 (ri-rNS-, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the WCB upon its adoption by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of January 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK 13 14 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / TY ATTORNEY CONSTRUL,_.JN SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : Pier Storm Damage ACCOUNT NUMBER : 001-401-8614-4201 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : mrisimmomm ACTUAL SCHEDULE : X : 100% COMPLETE I I I I I TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I I I I I I I Final design approval before advertising for construction I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 1111,111 date Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening Review bids I III I Award contract 11 I ------I Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period . Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project close out I --I 11 u I�nunInlnnntl 111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 u n 111111111111111111 January 19, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 24, 1989 REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE THIRTY DAY EXTENSION OF THE TERMINATION OF LEASE ON 704 FIRST PLACE Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council authorize the City Manager to extend the termination of lease effective date for 704 First Place from January 31, 1989 to February 28, 1989. Background: By letter dated December 8, 1988, the City notified the lessee, Vasek Polak, of the City's intent to terminate Mr. Polak.'s lease for the City -owned property at 704 First Place and 705 First Street (adjoining lots). The City has experienced problems with this use, and Mr. Polak has also found the property of limited value to his business. By Council action on December 13, 1988, the staff was directed to take the necessary steps to sell these lots and one other as surplus property not needed for a public purpose. Analysis: Mr. Polak has indicated he plans to vacate the lot on First Street this month. He does expect some deliveries in the near future and has inquired regarding an extension of time on the lot on First Place in order to provide a better opportunity to make other arrangements for his stored vehicle needs. He requested an extension to May of 1989, though I have suggested that a thirty day extension was more appropriate as it is less likely to impact the sale of the property. Extending the termination of lease effective date through February should have no impact on the plans for sale. KBN/ld cc: Vasek Polak, Lessee Jan McHugh, neighbor 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION INVESTIGATE AND REPORT ON THE HYDROLOGY REPORT AND CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR TENATIVE TRACT 30986 (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE POWER STREET DEVELOPMENT). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach held a public hearing on December 13, 1988 to consider this matter and made the following findings: 1. Said hydrology report indicates that there is potential difficulty with the deposition of water at said project in that substantial flooding may occur. 2. In approving preliminary grading plan, the land would have to remain at the same existing grade of the easterly adjoining lots. 3. The foregoing issues must be addressed to have the preliminary grading plan remain in effect. 4. The Planning Commission is the designated body charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on design pursuant to California Government Code Section 66415 (Subdivision Map Act) . 5. Design means, among other things, drainage and grading (Government Code Section 66418). /// t /// /// /// /// /// L43/reso -1- lm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby direct the Planning Commission to investigate and report on the drainage and grading at Tenative Tract 30986 (commonly known as the Power Street development). PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1989. PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY L43/reso -2- January 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 24, 1989 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CIP 85-102, HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications for Highland Avenue Widening, CIP 85-102. 2. Authorize staff to advertise for construction bids for this project. 3. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Background: On October 13, 1987 City Council received a preliminary design report and authorized completion of the plans and specifications for this project. On December 15, 1987, City Council authorized staff to submit the plans and specifications to Caltrans for approval. The plans & specifications were submitted on February 16, 1988. On June 6, 1988 Caltrans submitted its first review comments requiring changes and additional soils testing. After more reviews and meetings with Caltrans, the plans and specifications have been corrected to meet all requirements. Since this project receives Federal Aid Urban funding this project must meet all applicable federal requirements and receive Caltrans approval for the design. The plans and specification are available for review in the City Clerk's office. Analysis: The plans and specifications prepared by Barrett Consulting Group are complete, on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are ready to go out for bid. Caltrans has approved the plans and specifications and given verbal authorization to the City to advertise for construction bids. Fiscal Impact: Funding Sources: Street Lighting Fund State Gas Tax Fund Federal Aid Urban Sewer Fund FY 88-89 $26,000 17,800 64,000 11,000 TOTAL $118,800 Design Construction Inspection Subtotal Contingency TOTAL FY 88-89 (FY 87-88) Existing Spent to Date Appropriation $7,648 - 0- - 0- $ -0- 97,000 11,000 $7,648 $108,000 - 0- 10.800 $7,648 $118,800 Anticipated Final Expenditure $9,441 123,000 11,000 $143,441 14.344 $157,785 The engineer's estimate for construction is $123,000. An additional $38,985 may be required for this project. Actual funds required will be determined after construction bids and inspection proposals have been received. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Drop the project. 2. Modify the scope of work. This would delay the project, since the project would have to be re -designed, and possibly not meet Caltrans requirements. Respectfully Submitted: Concur: Brian Gengle Anth'ony Antich Assistant Engineer Director of PubfLic Works Concur: Noted for Fiscal Impact: Kevin B. Northcraft Viki Copeland City Manager Attachment: Construction schedule pwclerk haw Finance Administrator CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : Highland Avenue Widening, CIP 85-102 ACCOUNT NUMBER : 150-401-8102-4201 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : — mamiximum ACTUAL SCHEDULE : X : 100% COMPLETE I 1 I I I 1 I TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I 1 I I-. I. I I Final design approval before advertising 11 for construction I I I I I I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 1/11111/1 date Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening Review bids Award contract Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) 11111111) I I I 1 1 1 Preconstruction meeting procedure 1 I 11 Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records I I 11 1111 11111111111111 I 1 1 I 11111111111111111111111 I 1 I I I Progress payment and 1J IlII17IIIII17111 change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" 11 11 Retention Payment II Project close out 1111111111111111111. `. January 17, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beacb City Council January 24, 1989 SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT - MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR STRUCTURES IN THE MULTI USE CORRIDOR (MUC) INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation To receive and file. Background Ordinance No. 88-963, Section 4, required that a status report on the M.U.C. Mordtorium was to be prepared for the public for the second meeting in January. Such report was to include what steps have been taken and what steps are planned to remedy the situation. Current Status The Planning Department has hired an advanced planner to revise the General Plan. The first assignment will be to prepare an " analytical report and make a recommendation concerning the future delineation, use and development within the multi use corridor. The target date for the Planning Commission review is late March, 1989, and for the City Council late April, 1989. Concur: evin B. Northcraft City Manager a/mucmemo Resp.e ul ly : ut} 'itt. M a -1 h bach Planning Director •1, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • ORDINANCE NO. 88 - 963 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR STRUCTURES IN THE MULTI -USE CORRIDOR FOR TEN (10) MONTHS. WHEREAS, the Multi -Use Corridor was designed to allow for a mix of commercial and residential uses; WHEREAS, allowing residences in the Multi -Use Corridor area will restrict future opportunities for commercial development along the Commercial Corridor of Pacific Coast Highway; WHEREAS, the mixing of such uses, commercial and residential, blurs the distinctions between commercial and residential neigh- borhoods which create problems associated with commercial devel- opment spilling into residential neighborhoods; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it desires a study of this situation and a recommendation by the Planning Commission on what steps are necessary to take to ensure the integrity of residential neighborhoods while maintaining a secure commercial base; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that construction in the Multi -Use Corridor, during the period of the study, would defeat the purpose of the study. WHEREAS, the size of area involved requires a significant amount of lead time to study and, therefore, an extension of the moratorium is necessary to preserve the status quo and protect the future environment of the area during the period of study; // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. No building permits shall be issued for projects which meet the following criteria: Any construction projects in that portion of the area commonly known as the Multi -Use Corridor, which is shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and described as follows: 1. South City limits to Eighth Street,east and west sides of Pacific Coast Highway, all area designated Multi -Use Corridor except those areas west of the following: - Alley between Fourth Street and Fifth Street 822 Fourth Street - 819 Third Street 814 Third Street - 835 Second Street 2. West of the following addresses extending to Pacific Coast Highway: - 903 Fourteenth Street - 900 Fifteenth Street 901 Fifteenth Street 902 Fifteenth Place - 832 Sixteenth Street 1601 Raymond Avenue - 829 Seventeenth Street 826 Eighteenth Street - 821 Eighteenth Street 1851 Rhodes Street 1843 Rhodes Street 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 1835 Rhodes Street 824 Nineteenth Street - 821 Nineteenth Street 824 Twentieth Street 821 Twentieth Street - 826 Twenty-first Street 3. West of the following lots and/or streets: a. Rear of lots fronting on Raymond Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway. b. Borden Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway. • 4. East of the following addresses extending to Pacific Coast Highway: a. Lot 25, Block 1, Hermosa View Tract. b. Easterly seventeen (17) feet of Lot 44, Block 1, Hermosa View Tract. c. 1828 Springfield Avenue. d. 1830 Springfield Avenue. e. 1902 Springfield Avenue. f. 1910 Springfield Avenue. g. 1920 Springfield Avenue. Note: All of the above noted addresses are not included under this interim ordinance. (a) Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to October 11, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans, and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. (b) Subsection (a) also includes the projects located at 845 and 835 - 15th Street (845 - 15th Street having had a Conditional Use Permit approved on August 23, 1988). (c) This ordinance shall not apply to minor additions/alterations to residential structures that do not add units or where the valuation does not exceed thirty thousand' dollars ($30.000.00) as determined by the Building Official. (d) This ordinance shall not apply to lots that are currently vacant as of the date of adoption of this ordinance. Any vacant property within the multi -use corridor shall be allowed to build to the following standards: Zoned Commercial: C-1 standards Zoned Residential: R-1 standards. (e) In case of destruction by fire or other natural catastrophe of fifty percent or over, the property owner shall be allowed to rebuild to the zoning standards in existence at the time of the issuance of the building permit to reconstruct the structure. In the case of destruction by fire or other natural catastrophe of less than fifty percent (50%), the property owner shall be allowed to rebuild the structure to current building standards. This ordinance shall not preclude normal variance procedures. // Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 7 28 ten (10) months from today's date unless extended pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65858. Section 4. The City Council shall draft a report for presentation to the public at its second meeting in January, 1989. Such report shall state what steps are being taken by the City to correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps are planned to be taken in the future to remedy the situation. Section 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Y ATTORNE 'PRES ENT 0;\E CITY OUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 5 EXHIBIT A-1 AREAS OF MULTI -USE CORRIDOR INCLUDED IN INTERIM ORDINANCE (THE NOTED ADDRESSES ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE PROPOSED MORATORIUM AREA) East of the following: 654 8th Street 653 7th Street w Ur 1 NIN rN sr aa r W. IC..) 4 A W N H (ICON rN PI•CC NINTH ra 11L West of the following: C Lot 14, Dr."Dougherty's_ Hermosa Bay View Tract 665 6th Street 666 6th Street 683 5th Street 702 5th Street 673 4th Street. 847 7th Street 850 7th Street 839 6th Street 837 5th Street r 01 a Ur I w f MI (...11j. a M 702 4th Street - - 707 3rd Street 702 3rd Street 705 2nd Street West of alley 22 4th Street 819 3rd Street 708 2nd Street 705 1st Place Lot 124,Walter Ran- som Co.'s Venable Place Lot 140,Walter Ran- som Co.'s Venable Pla 710 1st Street • 14 3rd Street 835 2nd Street Lot 40, Home Builder's Place Lot 44, Trafton Heights Tract -848 1st Street EXHIBIT A-2 AREAS OF MULTI -USE CORRIDOR INCLUDED IN INTERIM ORDINANCE (THE NOTED ADDRESSES ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE PROPOSED MORATORIUM AREA) East of the following: .1. West of following: Easterly 17' of Lot 44,. Block 1, Hermosa View `" Tract n Lot 25, Block 1, Hermosa View Tract Borden Avenue -826 21st Street '821 20th ,Street 1828 Springfield Ave. 1830 Springfield Ave. 1902 Springfield Ave. 1910 Springfield Ave. 1920 Springfield Ave. (So. Bay Hospita District Property) 824 20th Street 821 19th Street 824 19th Street 1851 Rhodes Street 1843 Rhodes Street 1835 Rhodes Street 821 18th Street 826 18th Street +---829 17th Street 07 m -----"Rear of Raymond Ave. m lots 1601 Raymond Avenue 832 16th Street 902 15th Place u?? .90115th Street ,900 15th Street -903"_14th Street January 19, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting Of January 24, 1989 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PENAL CODE REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND. TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution. BACKGROUND: Penal Code Section 13510 has been amended to require the • Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) to establish minimum selection and training standards for local public safety dispatchers. The Commission adopted standards as a !part of a voluntary Public Safety Dispatcher Program which became effective January 1, 1989. All local agencies that are now in the POST peace officer program are eligible to participate in the Public Safety Dispatcher Program. Eligible agencies will be reimbursed for.certain dispatcher training costs only if they participate in the Public Safety Dispatcher Program. To participate in the Public Safety Dispatcher Program, the City must submit a letter to the Commission requesting participation, accompanied by a copy of a resolution pledging adherence to the standards adopted by the Commission. These minimum standards include: * A thorough background investigation; * A medical examination; * An evaluation of oral communication skills; * Satisfactory completion of a POST -certified, 80 -hour Basic Complaint/Dispatcher course within 12 months of the date of hire; and * A minimum of 12 months probation 1p ANALYSIS: The Hermosa Beach Police Department presently adheres to all of these minimum standards when hiring public safety dispatcher personnel. This resolution will allow the department to continue receiving reimbursement monies from the state whichsignificantly mitigate the costs of providing state -mandated public safety dispatcher training. CONCUR: STEVE ISNIEWSKI DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH KEVIN B. NORTH RAFT CITY MANAGER spectfull submitted, DER STAFF SE' HERMOSA :2 AHOALTFELD ICES D VISION ACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 2 3 4 5 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PENAL CODE REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS. WHEREAS, Penal Code Section 13510 has been amended to 6 require the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training 7 (POST) to establish minimum selection and training standards for local public safety dispatchers, and WHEREAS, The Commission adopted these standards as part of a voluntary Public Safety Dispatcher Program and these standards became law effective January 1, 1989, and WHEREAS, All local agencies that are now •in the POST peace officer program are eligible to participate in the Public Safety 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dispatcher Program and will be reimbursed for certain dispatcher 15 training costs only if they participate in the dispatcher 16 program. 17 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The City of Hermosa 18 19 20 21 22 Beach declares that it desires to qualify to receive aid from the State of California under provisions of Section 13522, Chapter 1, of Title 4, Part 4, of the California Penal Code, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Pursuant to Section 13510(c), Chapter 1, the City of -Hermosa Beach will adhere to standards for 23 I1 recruitment and training established by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST), and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, Pursuant to Section 13512, Chapter 1, the Commission and its representatives may make such 24 25 26 27 inquiries as deemed appropriate by the Commission to ascertain 28 that the City of Hermosa Beach public safety dispatcher personnel adhere to standards for selection and training established by the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1989. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: January 18, 1989 City Council Meeting January 24, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 89-972 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR THE WEST SIDE OF MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (R-2 TO R-1) Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 89-972 relating to the. above subject. At the meeting of January 10, 1989, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger None None None Respectfully submitted, Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: 7. / Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager 2 a 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89- 972 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR THE WEST SIDE OF MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 10, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. The lots in the subject area are too small to have more than one unit unless they are combined; B. This one block of lots is surrounded by Low Density, R-1 areas except for a small block to the north; C. Redesignating this area from Medium Density to Low Density, combined with the zone change from R-2 to R-1 will result in a more compatible neighborhood; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached map and legally described as follows:. 1. Redesignate the west side of Myrtle Avenue between 24th and 25th Street from R-2 to R-1, as shown on the attached map and legally described as follows: - Lots 13 through 28, Tract 1031. 2 This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effective from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be publi4hed in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 4. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of the said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ord. No. 88-972 proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of January 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: A/myrtle CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 1. Location West side of Myrtle Ave. between 24th ST. & 25th St. a. Address: b. Legal: see attached map 2. Description General Plan amendment & zone change from Medium Density, R-2, to Low Density, R-1. 3. Sponsor a. Name: City or Hermosa Beach, Planning DPS b. Mailing Address: 1514 valley Dr_ rk gfl2 4 Phone:(213) 318-0242 • NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which ii plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planninc Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects propose( to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE .We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this prc . posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, = '------- - --_ - - it would suppor the environment. Documentation Building Department. I(-3 dS Date of Finding not have a significant effect on finding is on file in the Chair. ohmental Review Committee FINDING OF THE PLANNING'ICOMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, - --_ .-.„ '., -- - e ' Tz4''"�•� *tie it would not have a significant effect on the en- vironment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Build- ing Department. /1. -- Date of Finding Cham man, Planning Commission FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, -- _ 4res are included i,n the--prn-jsct, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department.• _ C January 10, 1989 Date of Findinv vor, Hermosa :each CitCouncil TY WEST SIDE OF MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET & 25TH STREET N OVERVIEW MAP •T WENT Y SEVENTH ST GOUL 0 AVE. .3 0 H •r► fa lr Tr o sr 3 l� SIXTH A 0 E NTY • • r t Z c TWENTY 1 a 0 fY SECOND 8 MYRTLE • z S. 27. 20. . AVE. q) 41 I . 1 40 -•-• — 13 7.1' ' . ' '`-`(:) . 2583 30 • 1:-.350ii n — — .-- 14. ,,,,,,, 30 ' .. •. •• 0 2 15 `• ... . • . . .0. • 16 • • . . . . . .0. 17 • • . a 18 . . . , . : . .0 19 - .4i 3 1/4' .••,..1.:-, • . '. @ 20 . . • -. r . e 0. 21 - n @ 22 • • .. @ 23 - . 0 24 • . - • .;• 30 4 s/9 a.' /0 25??, . . - 30 .,, "i "1 S3 / 28 70 i' 28 78.88 b. 4 4 ...9 ) 1:390e•" 0 27 ‚4'7 ' • • ' Pc' ., 1''' , 26 • 50.4 s V $ OZONE ' CT. January 18, 1989 City Council Meeting January 24, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 89-973 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 20-2.2 TO CHAPTER 20 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO THE USE OF MULTIPLE POLICE RESPONSES TO ANY LOUD OR UNRULY ASSEMBLAGE. Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 89-973 relating to the above subject. At the meeting of January 10, 1989, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger None None None 4;;j �� Respectfully submitted, *1°11eet. Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk evin B. Northcraft, City Manager 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. r9- 973 An ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adding section 20-2.2 to Chapter 20 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, relating to the use of multiple police responses to any loud or unruly assemblage. WHEREAS, multiple police responses to large disorderly crowds at parties deplete the City's ability to handle more pressing calls for service and become an unnecessary burden on the general taxpayers; and WHEREAS, City Council is desirous of having those persons responsible for such events take precautions to prevent such events from occurring, react more quickly to remedy problems when they do occur, and cooperate more readily with police personnel charged with handling these disturbances in order to decrease the necessity for second responses, and be financially responsible for resultant costs and damages. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 20, titled Nuisances, of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be amended by adding thereto the following section: Section 1. Section 20-2.2, "Use of Police Officers at large Parties or Gatherings Requiring a Second Response." When any loud or unruly assemblage occurs and a police officer at the scene determines that there is a threat to the public peace, health, safety or general welfare, the person in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 charge of the premises and/or the person responsible for the event, or if either of those'persons is a minor, then the parents or guardians of the minor, will be held jointly and severally liable for the cost of providing police personnel on special security assignment over and above the services normally provided by the department. The police personnel utilized during a second or subsequent responses after the • first warning, to control the threat to the public peace, health, safety or general welfare,: shall be deemed to' be on special security assignment over and above the services normally provided. The costs of such special security assignment may include damages to city property and or injuries' to city personnel. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and operation from and after thirty days after its final passage and adoption. Section 3. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED and adopted this day of , 1989. • PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST CITY CLERK PPROVED TY ATTO'N January 18, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council January 24, 1989 APPROVAL OF CDBG PROJECTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council conduct the Public Hearing and approve the expenditure of $122,762 CDBG Funds for the following programs: Housing Rehabilitation Public Service Administration BACKGROUND $92,072 $18,414 $12,276 On July 26, 1988, the City Council approved the City re-entering the CDBG Program and also approved the hiring of a consultant to assist the City in administering the program. ANALYSIS The Public Hearing this evening is part of the process to participate in the program. The attached report is from the City's consultant detailing the parameters of the CDBG program as well as explaining the programs the consultant and staff are recommending that the City participate in for this coming year. There are two very important facts to keep in mind as the Council proceeds with this program: - Once programs are approved by the Council and for some reason the program does not work out, the Council can always go back and amend the contract with the Community Development Commission and choose another program that may be of benefit to the Community. - Any program chosen by the City Council must benefit low and moderate income persons or deal with the elimination of slum and blight conditions. Given this condition, the City is very limited in what programs it can participate in. However, there definitely are some and the recommendation before you this evening can be approved as is by the Council or amended as Council sees fit. The City's consultant, Mr. Bryon Baron will be in attendance at the Public Hearing to answer any and all questions. The three areas suggested for funding are: Housing Rehabilitation, Public Service Programs and Administration. Staff would like to expand upon those areas as follows: 1 5 Housing Rehabilitation: This program can be taken advantage of by any family or individual who qualifies as a Low/moderate income homeowner. These funds can be used by those individuals to rehab their homes in an effort to improve the housing stock of Hermosa Beach. At this time, there is no clear indication of the number of people who may be interested in the program and who would qualify. There are approximately 1,000 Seniors living in Hermosa Beach (per the 1980 census). Once this program is properly advertised the response to it will be monitored carefully. If it is determined there is not sufficient response to the program the City Council can amend the contract through the public hearing process and fund another project. Public Service Programs: Staff and consultant are recommending the City Council approve funding for the local Non-profit organizations the City ordinarily funds, i.e. 1736, Free Clinic, etc. These funds cannot be used in place of the City Funds but can be used to supplement what the City is already contributing. Staff will return with specific dollar recommendations for specific organizations in the very near future. Part of this funding will also be used for Senior Citizen Programs. Staff is looking into a joint venture agreement with a neighboring City as that City is already providing Senior Citizen Programs. In contracting with this City, Hermosa Beach can take advantage of programs that already are operational and will not need to duplicate services and costs. This concept is still being developed and staff will return at a later date with details. Administrative Costs A portion of the total allocation (10%) needs to be appropriated for administrative costs. Presently, the consultant is paid for out of the General Fund and his duties were to do whatever was necessary to get the City back into the CDBG Program. As emphazised in the original staff report, it is extremely important the City retain a consultant for this program once the program has begun. That cost can be paid by CDBG funds. And once the City is at that stage, we will have to go through an RFP to advertise for a consultant for this project. That is a CDBG requirement. Conclusion: Staff has spent a considerable amount of time with the Consultant in developing the recommendations listed. The recommendations can be amended by the City Council this evening. The City Council may wish to consider funding an economic development project. As an example, some downtown merchants wish to provide patio dining and appear to be willing to share costs for this with the City. Their letters explaining their interest are attached. There is also a possibility of the City assisting the Hospital District in the their development of the Senior Housing Project that appears to be scheduled for the old hospital site in Hermosa. These two projects were not recommended by the consultant and staff for two reasons: 1) it is not known at this point in time if the Council is interested in either of the projects; 2) Very little time has been spent with either group to really examine the projects and perhaps see where the City could fit in. However, the City Council may want to pursue this and amend the recommendation. However, the filing deadline for the CDBG application is February ---therefore some decision must be made at the Council meeting. However, the Council can amend these projects any time it wishes. Concur:, 'Kevin B. Nortnc,raft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Respectfully /- `cam` submitted, Alana Mastrian-Handman Assistant City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: 4.44 Viki Copeland Finance Administrator The attached petition regarding patio dining on Pier Avenue is one concept of how to promote the downtown area. The Chamber is meeting to discuss this and other options so that all future downtown changes will be compatible. Accordingly, more study needs to be completed before responding to the petition, but it does provide another example of possible future uses of CDBG funds. 3 1/13/89 Hermosa Hermosa Hermosa SOUTH B A Y' S WEEKLY Beach City Council Beach Civic Center Beach, California Dear City Council Members: The owners of the Hermosa Fish Market Cafe, Hennessey's Tavern and Diana's wish to provide patio dining for their customers. To do this would require extending the sidewalks in front of their restaurants. We believe patio dining in the downtown enhances the atmosphere of the area, making it more attractive to residents and visitors. For this reason we urge members of the city council to lend their support to the restaurant owner's proposal to provide patio dining on Pier Avenue. The restaurant owners have indicated they will shoulder a portion of the costs, and we believe block grant money might be available for the necessary city improvements. Thank you for your consideration of this request. /4K t - Sincerely, 2AtNBscAottitA t vIOfo f riv'E4- e_ 424Fcr ait&le J,:s4i(2444 Llto - L Litt, l C, ,y RA bis << b (ran /Luke, c-0 (41/4,f. Cckv1-11(511 1r5uc,Q P.O. Box 427 1 1233 Hermosa Ave. 1 Hermosa Beach, Ca. 1 90254-0427 1 (213) 372-4611 1/13/89 Hermosa Hermosa Hermosa S O.0 T H B A Y' S Beach City Council Beach Civic Center Beach, California Dear City Council Members: WEEKLY The owners of the Hermosa Fish Market Cafe, Hennessey's Tavern and Diana's wish to provide patio dining for their customers. To do this would require extending the sidewalks in front of their restaurants. We believe patio dining in the downtown enhances the atmosphere of the area, making it more attractive to residents and visitors. For this reason we urge members of the city council to lend their support to the restaurant owner's proposal to provide patio dining on Pier Avenue. The restaurant owners have indicated they will shoulder a portion of the costs, and we believe block grant money might be available for the necessary city improvements. Thank you for your Sincerely, consideration of this request. LA fiLl-c scj ((i(c_ (( ,r( s-14'2 4.,,,,,Ak()o\kaccan J as-7- P.O. s-j P.O. Box 427 ® 1233 Hermosa Ave. I Hermosa Beach, Ca. 190254-0427 I (213) 372-4611 July 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council July 26, 1988 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council approve 1) the attached resolution approving a Cooperation Agreement between Los Angeles County and the City of Hermosa Beach for participation in the Community Development Block Grant Program; 2) approve the hiring of a consultant to prepare the project application papers and eventually administer the program. BACKGROUND The City of Hermosa Beach has participated in the Block Grant Program in the past. On September 22, 1987 the then City Council decided not to .continue to participate in the program once the existing contract was concluded. The main reason for the decision not to participate was the lack of in-house staff to oversee the program and the difficulty the City was encountering with LA County with regard to the CDBG Program. ANALYSIS The County contacted the City two weeks ago and indicated they were extending the City (nd other cities) an opportunity .to join the program again even though the three year cycle had already begun. 'By joining now the City could participate in the last two years of this present three year program. Funding would not be available until July, 1989. We have been advised there are two programs in which the City can participate: 1) senior citizen and low/moderate income housing rehab program; or 2) the economic development program. Staff is recommending at this time the first program, that of housing rehab. The recommendation also includes the City Council approving a consultant to be hired for the purpose of administering the program. Initially, the consultant fees will be paid through the general fund of the City. It is at this time the consultant will prepare the necessary application papers for approval of the first project the City undertakes. Once the City is in the program, 10% of the total amount of grant funds approved can be used for administration purposes. Staff will return to the City Council for final approval of a consultant which will include a contract and a specified dollar amount. Should City Council - 1 - 2e. decide not to approve a consultant for the purposes listed above, staff recommends not participating in the CDBG program. Present in-house staff is not capable of taking on this project. Presently, staff is not sure of the allocation the City may be able to receive in this program. Based on previous year's allocations, it may be around $100,000. The Housing Rehab Program that staff is recommending the City Council approve, can be designed per the wishes of the City Council. The various options available to the City Council will be presented at a later date, once the Council approves re-entry into the Program. Staff has contacted the cities of Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach to determine their use of CDBG funds. The City of Manhattan Beach uses CDBG funds for senior citizen housing rehabilitation and contributions to 1736 Projects and the Free Clinic. The City of Redondo Beach uses its funds for a variety of programs. Redondo Beach has many more options for use of CDBG funds due to the diverse make Up of that City. Manhattan Beach and Hermosa Beach are not that diverse and are very limited in how CDBG funds can be used. Concur• 'Kevin B. NortnCraft City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian Assistant City Manager k JAN 18 '89 15:20 MARK BRIGGS ASSOC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS AND BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 TO: CITY COUNCIL P.2/9 I. INTRODUCTION It is necessary to commence with the planning process for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application for fiscal year 1989-90. For planning purposes, the city can anticipate receiving revenue in the amount of $122,762. This report, prepared as part of the CDBG requirements, will discuss the status of the past years projects and the recommended projects for funding for the coming program year. II. BACKGROUND The primary objective of the CDBG program is that the majority of funds (60%) must go to projects that benefit Iow and moderate income persons or projects that will deal with the elimination of slum and blight conditions. Even with the categroy of slurn and blight, the City must spend a minimum of 60% of its funds on projects that benefit !ow and moderate income families. 1 4 JAN 18 '89 15:20 MARK BRIGGS a ASSOC P.3/q �. PREVIOUS YEARS CD13G PROGRAM As part of its application process, the city must describe the programs they implemented during the past year (1988-89) and how those programs met the goals and objectives that were established by the city. The national CDBG program objectives that were met by the programs must also be identified. The national CDBG objectives are programs that meet the following: 1. Programs that primarily benefit low and moderate income households. 2. Elimination of slums and blight. The City of Hermosa Beach did not participate in the CDBG programs during the past several years. They are re-entering the program and have an agreement with the County to participate for the next three years. IV. 1989-90 PROGRAM YEAR A. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES FOR FUNDING The following is a general listing of activites that are eligible for funding under the provisions of the Community Development Block Grant program. The projects must meet the test of addressing community development and housing needs and the national priorities of principally benefitting low and moderate income households or for the prevention or elimination of slums and blight. 1. acquistion of property 2. public facilities and imprc'vements 3. .neighborhood facilities 4. parking facilities 2 5. street improvements 6. clearance activities 7. payment of matching share for other grants 8. urban renewal 9. relocation 10. loss or rental income 11. removal of architectural barriers 12. rehabilitation activities 13. economic development activities 14. code enforcement 15. planning and administrative costs 16. public service activities If the City Council should consider undertaking funding public service programs, the CDBG regulations require funding of public services activities be limitted to new or expansion of existing activities, not to replace funds currently being provided from other sources. In addition, the funding level is limited to 15% of the City's annual CDBG allocation and still must primarily benefit low and moderate income individuals. Programs must be in Census Tract Block Groups that have a majority of low and moderate income individuals or be programs that can be monitored to assure that the majority of the participants are low and moderate income. JHI`i "�7 1D;1 I1HKK GN'llb5 2x Hb UL �. 579 B. PROPOSED-BUI GET The following is a description of the projects proposed to be included in the City 1989-90 GDBG program. The Exhibit to this report gives a detailed budget breakout. 1. Housing Rehabilitation -92 072 Staff is recommending that the City implement a Housing Rehabilitation program that would be available to qualified low/moderate income senior citizen homeowners (including mobile trailer homeowners). As an initial start for the first year, it is recommended that the program provide grant funds of up to $3,000 per applicant for rehabilitation activities. The program would be available city-wide to qualified applicants. The process for the loan program would include initial marketing activity, followed by applicants eligibility determination, work write-ups to determine rehabilitation work to be done, City Council approval, notification to applicant to proceed with selection of contractor, prepayment made (if required), inspection of completed work and final payment. A complete Implementation Plan will be submitted to the City Council for their review prior to the commencement of the program. As part of the program, a staff person will have to be hired to run the program. Their salary and benefits will be paid for by the program. City staff is currently reviewing the possibility of using part-time housing rehabilitation staff from an adjacent city. 4 2. Public --Ser vice - $1-8-,4-14 Staff is recommending that non-profit public service organizations be funded, such as: 1736 Project South Bay Free Clinic Senior Citizen Programs Individual agreements between the City and the selected non-profit organizations will be developed and brought back to the City Council for approval prior to funding. The non-profit services offered will be available city-wide to qualified low and moderate income households and individuals. 3. Administration - $12,276 Staff is recommending that these funds be used for staff costs and for consultant services to meet program requirements. These include monthly draw -down requests, preparation of Annual Housing Assistance Plan, Grantee Performance Report, etc. The administrative funding is limited to 10% of the City's annual allocation. C. UNEXPENDED FUNDS Since the City has not participated in the CDBG program for the past several years, there are no unexpended funds remaining. 5 V. BENEFITS TO LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS The projects described above meet the CDBG program and City's goals and objectives of primarily benefitting low and moderate income households (income levels listed below). The estimated amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used for activities during the 1989-90 program year that will benefit low and moderate income households is anticipated to total $110,486. This represents 90% of the total funding level of $126,762. The remaining 10% of the funds are for Planning and Management and are not subject to the low and moderate income benefit test. The following are the maximum low and low/moderate income levels by family size, established by the County. i/of Persons in Family Low (50% of Median) Low/Moderate (80% of Median) 1 13,400 19,900 2 15,300 22,700 3 17,250 25,550 4 19,150 28,400 5 20,700 30,200 6 22,200 31,950 7 23,750 33,750 8 25,300 35,500 VI. DISPLACEMENT The City's CDBG funded projects will not involve the displacement or relocation of low and moderate income persons from dwelling units. 6 If relocation were to occur, due to a CDBG funded activity, the City would follow and comply with the Federal and State Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Act requirements. VII. FAIR MARKET RENT FOR RENTAL REHABILITATION The CDBG regulations indicate a jurisdiction must establish and make known fair market rent levels where rental rehabilitation is occuring. However, the City's Housing Rehabilitation program is not available to landlords or tenants and therefore, there is no requirement for notification of fair market rent levels. The reason for this requirement is HUD's concern of providing CDBG funds to landlords to rehabilitate their rental units (which are occupied by low and moderate income tenants), who then increase their rents to levels that are no longer affordable to low and moderate income tenants. VIII. RECOMMENDATION City Staff recommends the City Council approve the City's 1989-90 CDBG programs and budgets as presented, or as amended. Hermosa Beach/011889 7 t EXHIBIT 1989-90 CDBG PROPOSED BUDGET I ousing Rehabilitation Grants Housing Rehabilitation Staff Public Service Public Service Programs 1736 Project South Bay Free Clinic Senior Citizen Programs Etc. Administration Staff Consultant Services 1989-90 u n�Q $ 92,072 $ 18,414 $ 12,276 - TOTAL $ 122,762 Hermosa/011889 January 17, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council January 24, 1989 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SECOND FLOOR AND FIRST FLOOR ADDITION WHICH ENCROACHES INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK LOCATION: 576 21ST STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE EASTERLY 25' OF LOT 43 AND THE WESTERLY 30' OF LOT 44, TRACT 1868 APPLICANTS: RICHARD AND RENEE GALLAGHER 576 21ST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council continue this public hearing to the City Council meeting of February 14, 1989. Background The applicant has requested a variance to add a second story and first floor addition and to maintain a nonconforming setback. This item must be continued because the applicant did not mail the public notices. The applicant was informed of the 300' noticing requirement, however, did not pick up the public notice documentation in time to meet mailing deadlines. The applicant has been notified that the appeal must be continued and was also informed that the rescheduled public hearing will require proper notification. CONG R• Mich ell Scnu Planning Director a/pcsr576 Andrew Peva Associate Tanner Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council (CONTINUED FROM 1/10/89) January 17, 1989 Regular Meeting of January 24, 1989 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE WITHIN THE SEVENTEEN FOOT (17') SETBACK LOCATION: 1836 PALM DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF LOT 17 AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EASTERLY .84' OF LOT 18, TRACT 1132 PROPERTY DANIEL POST OWNER: 25 TIBURON COURT MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90277 Recommendation Staff recommends that the. City Council approve the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to construct a garage within the seventeen foot setback and approval of an Environmental Negative Declaration. Background Project Details - Zoning: R-2 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Lot Size: 1582 sq. ft., approx. 30' by 51' The City Council, at their meeting of January 10, 1989, continued this public hearing to allow the applicant to properly notice the hearing. The applicant originally mailed several notices without postage. The public hearing has been renoticed pursuant to state and local laws. The original request was for variances to allow a garage within the 17' setback, to provide no guest parking, and to maintain nonconforming walls. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of November 15, 1988, denied the subject variances. Subsequently, an appeal was filed and revised plans were received. The Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of October 6, 1988, recommended a Negative Declaration for the subject variances. Analysis Following the denial of their original variance requests, the applicants met with staff to discuss how to revise plans which would provide a guest parking space. Revised plans have been - 1 - s received which provide guest parking, however, a variance is still required to encroach into the 17' setback. Included with the revised plans is a demolition plan for the proposed development. The demolition plan helps to identify the area to be removed and to determine if the proposed devopment will ultimately create a new structure. Staff has analyzed the plan and has determined that most of the exterior walls will remain, although many exterior doors and windows will be sealed to conform with Building Code requirements. However, the plans indicate that most of the interior walls on the main floor will be removed. All new construction will conform to required setbacks. The section of the Zoning Code regarding nonconforming dwelling is unclear as to the extent of demolition permitted on nonconforming structures. It does appear, however, that most of the demolition of the proposed development is internal and will not effect nonconforming sideyards. Staff's original recommendation for denial of the variances was strongly based on the fact that no guest parking was to be provided. However, since revised plans now provide guest parking, staff is recommending approval of a variance to allow a garage within the 17' setback. The site is small and has a steep slope, making construction of a garage with the 17' setback difficult. Also, the existing dwelling has only one parking space; two parking spaces will be added. C,QNCU Michael Schubach Planning irgctor Kevin B. Northtraft City Manager Attachments 1. C.C. Resolution No. 89- 2. P.C. Resolution 88-97 3. Background 1. P.C. Staff Report of 11/15/88 2. P.C. Minutes of 11/15/88 3. Zoning Analysis 4. Appeal Letter 5. Staff Review Minutes 6. Application 7. Public Notice Affidavit a/pcsrl836 Respec ully.mi.tted, Andres' ' erea Associate P1: ner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A GARAGE WITHIN THE SEVENTEEN FOOT (17') SETBACK AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1836 PALM DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF LOT 17 AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EASTERLY .84' OF LOT 18, TRACT 1132. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on January 10, 1989 and January 24, 1989 to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings:. A. The Planning Commission denied the original project which also required a variance for guest parking; B. An appeal was filed and revised plans were received which provides a guest parking space; C. Since plans have been revised to provide adequate parking, staff is recommending approval of the variance to allow a garage within the 17' setback; D. The site is unique because it is small, approximately 1600 sq. ft., and has a steep slope; E. The topography of the parcel would make construction of a garage within the seventeen foot setback very difficult; F. The variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity since additions to existing homes are desirable; G. The variance will not be detrimental to surrounding properties, but will improve the parking situation; H. The variance will not adversely affect the General Plan and will support it's policy to provide off-street parking whenever possible; -3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a on appeal a variance to allow a garage within the seventeen foot setback and an Environmental Negative Declaration at 1836 Palm Drive subject to the following Conditions: 1. Three sets of plans shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Department. a. Any modifications to approved plans shall require review and approval by the Planning Director. b. The garage door shall be of the roll -up type. c. The plans shall conform to all other planning and zoning requirements. " 2. All Public Works and Fire Department requirements shall be complied with. 3. An "Acceptance of Conditions" form shall be executed and submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of January, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: a/persl836 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 9' December 29, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council January 10, 1989 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE WITHIN THE SEVENTEEN FOOT (17') SETBACK LOCATION: 1836 PALM DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF LOT 17 AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EASTERLY .84' OF LOT 18, TRACT 1132 • PROPERTY DANIEL POST OWNER: 25 TIBURON COURT MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90277 Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to construct a garage within the seventeen foot setback and approval of an Environmental Negative Declaration. Background Project Details - Zoning: R-2 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Lot Size: 1582 sq. ft., approx. 30' by 51' The original request was for variances to allow a garage within the 17' setback, to provide no guest parking, and to maintain nonconforming walls. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of November 15, 1988, denied the subject variances. Subsequently, an appeal was filed and revised plans were received. The Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of October 6, 1988, recommended a Negative Declaration for the subject variances. Analysis Following the denial of their original variance requests, the applicants met with staff to discuss how to revise plans which would provide a guest parking space. Revised plans have been received which provide guest parking, however, a variance is still required to encroach into the 17' setback. Included with the revised plans is a demolition plan for the proposed development. The demolition plan helps to identify the area to be removed and to determine if the proposed devopment 1 will ultimately create a new structure. Staff has analyzed the plan and has determined that most of the exterior walls will remain, although many exterior doors and windows will be sealed to conform with Building Code requirements. However, the plans indicate that most of the interior walls on the main floor will be removed. All new construction will conform to required setbacks. The section of the Zoning Code regarding nonconforming dwelling is unclear as to the extent of demolition permitted on nonconforming structures. It does appear, however, that most of the demolition of the proposed development is internal and will not effect nonconforming sideyards. Staff's original recommendation for denial of the variances was strongly based on the fact that no guest parking was to be provided. However, since revised plansnow provideguest parking, staff•is recommending approval of a variance to allow a garage within the 17' setback. The site is small and has a steep. slope, making construction of a garage within the 17' setback difficult. Also, existing dwelling has only one parking space; two .parking spaces will be added. CONC Michael Schubach Planning Director 'Kevin B.`Northcraft City Manager Attachments 1. C.C. Resolution No. 89- 2. P.C. Resolution 88-97 3. Background 1. P.C. Staff Report of 11/15/88 2. P.C. Minutes of 11/15/88 3. Zoning Analysis 4. Appeal Letter 5. Staff Review Minutes 6. Application 7. Public Notice Affidavit a/pcsr1836 2 Res •�� 1 � bmitted, An• rew ' ere Associate P anner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A GARAGE WITHIN THE SEVENTEEN FOOT (17') SETBACK AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1836 PALM DRIVE, LEGALLYDESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF LOT 17 AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EASTERLY .84' OF LOT 18, TRACT 1132. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on January 10, .1989 to receive oral and written testimony and made the following. Findings: A. The Planning Commission denied' the original also tequired a variance for guest parking; B. An appeal was filed and revised plans were received which provides a guest parking space; C. Since plans have been revised to provide adequate parking, staff is recommending approval of the variance to allow a garage within the 17' setback; D. The site is unique because it is small, approximately 1600 sq. ft., and has a steep slope; E. The topography of the parcel would make construction of a garage within the seventeen foot setback very difficult; F. The variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity since additions to existing homes are desirable; G. The variance will not be detrimental to surrounding properties, but will improve the parking situation; H. The variance will not adversely affect the General Plan and will support it's policy to provide off-street parking whenever possible; project which 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a on appeal a variance to allow a garage within the seventeen foot setback and an Environmental Negative Declaration at 1836 Palm Drive subject to the following Conditions: 1. Three sets of plans shall be submitted for.approval by the Planning Department. a. Any modifications to approved plans shall require review and approval by the Planning Director. b, The garage door shall be.of the roll -up type. c.. The plans shall conform to all other planning and zoning requirements. 2. All Public Works and Fire Department requirements shall 'be complied with. 3. An "Acceptance of Conditions" form shall be executed and submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of January, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: a/pers1836 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-97 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A NEW GARAGE INTO THE SEVENTEEN FOOT (17') SETBACK, TO PROVIDE NO GUEST PARKING, AND TO MAINTAIN EXISTING NONCONFORMING WALLS AT 1836 PALM DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF LOT 17 AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EASTERLY .84' OF LOT 18, TRACT 1132. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on November 15, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The applicant is requesting a variance to extensively remodel the existing structure and to provide a one foot setback, to provide no guest parking, and to maintain existing nonconforming walls; B. Staff has 'determined that the extent of the remodel constitutes a new structure since over 5370 of external walls will be removed and most interior wall relocated; C. There are no unusual features of size, shape, or topography which justify granting a variance for this property. The property is rectangular, and the size of the site would allow a guest parking space; D. The variance is not necessary to obtain or preserve a property right possessed by other property owners in the area since all other new development are built to zoning code regulations; E. The variance will be detrimental to the general public since inadequate parking will be provided for the proposed stucture; F. The granting of this variance will adversely affect the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 General Plan since a provision of the General Plan is to provide off-street parking whenever possible; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby deny the variances to encroach into the seventeen foot setback, provide no guest parking, and to maintain existing nonconforming walls at 1836 Palm Drive. VOTE; AYES: Comm. Ingell,Chmn.Peirce NOES: Comm.Rue ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms.Edwards,Ketz • CERTIFICATION I hereby.certify tha the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-97 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of November 15, 1988 `/E @.n,riv Jame) Peirce, Chairman Date a/persl836. Michael Schubac , Secretary Backgriititth aIrriai i November 8, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission November 15, 1988 SUBJECT: VARIANCE VAR 88-11 LOCATION: 1836 PALM DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF LOT 17 AND THE WEST HALF OF THE EASTERLY .84' OF LOT 18, TRACT 1132 PROPERTY DANIEL POST OWNER: 25 TIBURON COURT MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90277 REQUEST: 1. TO CONSTRUCT A NEW GARAGE WITHIN THE 17'SETBACK. • 2. TO PROVIDE NO GUEST PARKING 3. TO MAINTAIN EXISTING NONCONFORMING WALLS Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variances. Background Project Details - Zoning: R-2 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Lot Size: 1582 sq. ft., approx. 30' by 51' The Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of October 6, 1988, recommended a Negative Declaration for the subject variances. Analysis The original application is for a variance to the seventeen foot setback, however, after analysis of the plans, staff has determined that the proposed development is a new structure. The variance was intended to be in conjuntion with an addition/remodel to an existing structure. However, the extent of demolition and reconstuction of the existing structure will basically create a new dwelling; therefore, variances are also needed for no guest parking and Section 1309 regarding existing nonconforming structures. The applicant is proposing to add approximately 728 sq. ft. to an existing 1570 sq. ft. dwelling. It should be noted, however, that an extensive remodel is proposed for the remaining dwelling. Basically, all internal walls will be removed and relocated. Approximately 537 of the external walls will also be removed. C The existing exterior walls have many conconforming setbacks, including both side yards, rear yard and front yard. The proposed new construction will be within required setbacks. The existing structure has only one substandard parking space, approximately 16' deep. The applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing garage parking space to 19' 9" and to add another space adjacent to the existing garage. Section 1309, Existing Nonconforming Structures, allows for additions to structures with nonconforming sideyards, however, this section does not provide for extensive remodels of the existing.structure(s); it does not .allow for removal of any portion of a non -conforming structure. Therefore, the Planning Commission must interpret what should be reasonable, understanding that some removal of the existing structure is always necessary when expanding a structure. The intent of this section is not to allow for the development of new structures to be built around nonconforming walls, but rather to allow for minor additions where an intact building will remain. As a new structure, the proposed development will require an added guest parking space. The site is large enough to provide the required parking. Other projects have been approved on lots small than the subject parcel which provide all required parking. Staff cannot justify any finding to grant the subject variances. The lot is adequate in size to provide the required guest parking space. Other projects with smaller lots have been constructed with all required parking. Also, because of the extensive demolition of the existing structure, it has been determined that this is a new structure and should comply with all setbacks and required parking. CONCUR: ;;1/2/7 Michael Schu ach Planning Director a/pcsr1836 An Associate P ner • C C VARIANCE TO ALLOW GARAGE TO ENCROACH INTO 17 -FOOT SETBACK AND TO PROVIDE NO GUEST PARKING SPACE AND TO ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1836 PALM DRIVE Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated November 8, ,1988. This project is in the R-2 zone with a general plan designation of medium density residential. The lot size is 1582 square feet. The original application was for a variance for the 17 -foot setback; however, after analysis of the plans, staff has determined that the proposed development is a new structure. The variance was intended to be in conjunction with an addition/remodel to an existing structure. However, the extent of demolition and reconstruction of the existing structure will basically create a new dwelling; therefore, variances are also necessary for no guest parking and Section 1309 regarding existing nonconforming structures. The- applicant is proposing to add approximately 728 square feet to an existing 1570 square -foot dwelling. It should be noted, however, that an extensive remodel is proposed for the remaining dwelling. Basically, all internal walls will be removed and relocated. Approximately 53 percent of the external walls will also be removed. The existing exterior walls have many conforming setbacks, including both side yards, rear yard, and front yard. The proposed new construction will be within the required setbacks. The existing structure has only one substandard parking space, approximately 16 feet deep. The applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing garage parking space to 19 feet, 9 inches, and to add another space adjacent to the existing garage. Section 1309, Existing Nonconforming Structures, allows for additions to structures with nonconforming sideyards; however, this section does not provide for extensive remodels of the existing structure(s). It does not allow for removal of any portion of a non- conforming structure. Therefore, the Planning Commission must interpret what should P.C. Minutes 11/15/88 be reasonable, understanding that some removal of the existing structure is always necessary when expanding a structure. The intent of this section is not to allow for the development of new structures to be built around nonconforming walls, but rather to allow for minor additions where an intact building will remain. As a new structure, the proposed development will require an added guest parking space. Other projects have been approved on lots smaller than the subject parcel and provide all required parking. Staff cannot justify any findings to grant the subject variance. The lot is adequate in size to provide the required guest parking space. Other projects with smaller lots have been constructed with all required parking. Also, bemuse of the extensive demolition of the existing structure, it has been determined that this is a new structure and should comply with all setback and parking requirements. Comm. Rue asked if a building wall is maintained, but an addition is made to it, such as a window, would that section of the wall be considered a new structure. Mr. Schubach stated that the code section is silent in regard to what can and cannot be removed. He stated that this issue is left to the interpretation of the 'Planning Commission. He stated that it is usually assumed that a portion of the structure will be removed if something is to be added to it. In this case, staff felt that the portion being removed and replaced is quite extensive. Comm. Rue asked whether there is an existing level floor plan. Mr. Schubach explained the plans in regard to what is being removed and what will remain. • • Mr. Schubach and the Commissioners discussed the new revised plans versus the previously submitted plans. Chmn. Peirce stated that he found it difficult to relate to what existed at the previous residence. Comm. Rue agreed that it was difficult to ascertain what is being proposed by looking at the plans. Mr. Schubach handed out photographs depicted the project site. Public Hearing opened at 7:56 P.M. by Chmn. Peirce. Maxwell Wuthritch, representing the applicant, Post Remodel, 1836 Palm Avenue, addressed the Commission. He explained that the perimeter of the building will remain the same; only the bottom garage floor will be extended. He stated that the exterior walls will remain the same, and only interior walls will be removed. New windows will also be installed. The exterior walls will remain, and another level will be added above. He stated that the garage actually counts as a basement since it is over 50 percent into the grade. Mr. Wuthritch stated that the house is being extended toward the alley, and the rest of the house will go straight up. He clarified the plans, explaining that the dashed lines represent walls which will be removed;. the darker lines represent new walls or windows. He agreed that perhaps a demolition plan would have clarified the matter. T /0 — P.C. Minutes 11/15/88 Comm. Rue asked whether the main level will be extended toward the alley side of the lot. Mr. Wuthritch stated that that level is currently directly above the garage, which at its nearest point, sits one foot from the property line. The upper level steps back, and there is a balcony at that level. Comm. Rue felt that there is not adequate information to decide whether or not 50 percent or more of the existing structure is actually being removed. Without a demolition plan, he stated that it is difficult to. make a decision. Comm. Rue stated that the area where the balcony is located on the main level includes a series of french doors with a storage area. He said that that appears to be new construction. He noted that there is no way for the Commissioners to know whether that is new or old construction because it is not clear where the old doors and windows were actually located. He stated that it appears, from looking at the shaded areas on the plans, that the entire main level is being demolished and rebuilt. Mr. Wuthritch continued by discussing the various locations of the walls. He stated that the floor joists for the main level will remain the same. He stated that the applicant .has been working with staff on this project since the beginning of June, and nothing was ever mentioned about needing guest parking. It was not until they got to the staff meeting that they were informed of the parking requirement for guest spaces. Mr. Wuthritch stated that the applicant was informed at the staff meeting that guest parking was required because the currently existing garage is substandard; i.e., 17 feet, six inches versus the required 18 foot minimum. Chmn. Peirce noted that the plans are dated October 10; he asked what the applicant actually showed staff when staff asserted that the project could commence without having to worry about whether 50 percent or more was being demolished. Mr. Wuthritch stated that the first meeting with staff was on July 15. He stated that at that meeting staff was given the same materials which the Planning Commission has now with the exception of the garage plans, which were not included at that time. Mr. Wuthritch stated that staff then requested that a field measure be submitted along with an existing plan for the garage. At that time, staff reviewed the materials and commented that it would be necessary for the applicant to apply for a variance if the applicant intended to enlarge the garage, since the existing garage is substandard. Mr. Wuthritch, responding to a question by Comm. Rue, stated that the east wall of the garage is being redone in order to make the garage comply with the code requirements. He stated that earth will be removed, and a retaining wall will be built. He stated that the original plan was to make to garage larger so that it would conform; however, if the garage is enlarged, it then becomes necessary to provide the guest parking. Comm. Ingell asked why the applicant didn't merely propose to add another six inches in order to make the garage comply. Mr. Wuthritch agreed that that would be the easiest solution; however, the staff stated that since the garage is substandard, a variance would be necessary. I f — P.C. Minutes 11/15/88 C Comm. Ingell agreed that Section 1309 is silent on the issue of how much of an existing structure can be removed before it becomes new construction; however, he felt that Section 1307 is very specific on this matter. That section states that if a structure is destroyed by an act of God, up to 50 percent of its reasonable replacement value can be reconstructed on a nonconforming structure; Section 1309 mentions no specific percentage. Comm. Rue stressed that the garage is being enlarged to comply with the code. He stated that the main level will remain substantially the same it is currently exists; also, the floor joists will remain as they are. He felt that the outside perimeter walls will remain very much as they currently exist. He felt that the only major change will be on the west elevation, which is on the alley. Comm. Ingell noted, however, that another story is being added. Comm. Rue stated, though, that the addition is not counted into the 50 percent reconstruction calculation, and it is above the main structure. The main structure is what one• starts with when determining the calculations. John Hales, 624 8th Place, Hermosa Beach, stated that the City is already overbuilt; therefore, he strongly opposed the granting of a variance to eliminate the guest parking. He urged the Planning Commission to adhere to the code requirements. He felt that this project can conform without having to obtain a variance. • Public Hearing closed at 8:07 P.M. by Chmn. Peirce. Chmn. Peirce noted that this lot is very small; if the variance is approved, the Commission essentially would be allowing the applicant to violate the zoning code. Further, this remodel will probably last for many years with the nonconforming setback. He noted that parking is already a problem in this particular area. He felt that the variance request is merely an attempt to avoid adhering to the requirements set forth in the zoning code. Comm. Rue asked whether the 17 -foot setback is required on a remodel. Mr. Schubach stated that remodels do not need the 17 -foot setback. He noted, however, that the interpretation for this project has come from the Building Department, and it has been determined that the work is too substantial to be considered a remodel. Further, the interpretation calls for the garage to be of a standard size. Comm. Rue felt that this issue is going in circles; i.e., if the garage is enlarged to comply with the code, then it becomes necessary to apply for a variance because the project would no longer be considered a remodel. Comm. Rue felt that the applicant is attempting to comply with the code. He also stated that he sees this project as a remodel. He stated that the garage is being expanded to meet code, and the main level is being changed; but by no means does the work change 50 percent of the structure. He agreed that interior walls are being removed; however, he thought the issue depends on whether or not exterior walls were being removed. He did not feel that the relocation of doors and windows in an existing wall constitutes new construction. Mr. Schubach stated that when he examined the plans, it was difficult to tell the exact locations for the door and window relocations. `-1)-- P.C. Minutes 11/15/88 Comm. Ingell felt that a demolition plan would have been very helpful on this matter. He stated that, by looking at the plans presented, it appears that most of the structure is being replaced. Mr. Wuthritch stressed that the perimeter of the building will remain the same. All new construction will conform to the three-foot setbacks. Most of the new work will be performed on the interior. Chmn. Peirce stated that, by looking at the plan, almost everything existing is being removed. He did not feel this project to be a remodel. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Rue, stated that staff did not include the interior wall removals in the percentages; only the exterior walls were calculated. MOTION by Chmn. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to approve staff's recommendation to deny the variance at 1836 Palm Drive. Comm. Rue felt that this project is a remodel; and that a variance is not necessary for this construction. He felt that the project should be allowed to go forward; therefore, he could •not .support the motion. AYES: Comm. Ingell, Chmn. Peirce NOES: Comm. Rue ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms. Edwards, Ketz Chmn. Peirce noted that all decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed by writing to the City Council within ten days. . J-13_ P.C. Minutes 11/15/88 RESIDENTIAL ZONING ANALYSIS�5- Project Address: l3 1!��,�,�, / . Legal Description: W !/2 �� L�r l`� kJ,i / . = 1 Type of Project: N./A.c.-1 kNo. Units: '-r\(- Property Owner: Applicant(s): Designer: til h> Date of Plans: i'2 -/S /t Analysis Prepared by: / . ******************************** Zoning: T�- General Plan Designation: M G 12 cE3, 1 Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre Allowed (DU/AC): R-1 13 DU/AC 1 Dwelling Unit per Lot R-2 25 DU/AC 1 Unit per 1750 sq. ft. of land R-3, 33 DU/AC 1 Unit per 1320 sq. ft. of land Lot Area: l� Proposed Density -Dwelling Units/Acres 1'C` /N1�� EF_l-�L7— Maximum Allowable Lot Coverage: 6570 Proposed Lot Coverage: Minimum Unit Size: a) 1 bedroom - 900 sq. ft. b) 2 bedroom - 1100 sq. ft. c) 3 bedroom - 1400 sq. ft. d) 4 bedroom - 1600 sq. ft. Proposed Unit Size(s): • Useable Open Space Required a) R-1 - 400 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 10' 75% ground - 25% balconies, open to the sky b) R-2 & R -2B - 200 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 7' c) R-3 - 200 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 7' d) R -P - 200 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 7' Condominium developments requires 100 sq. ft. of additional private open space, minimum dimension of 7'. Each condominium development of five (5) units or more requires 100 sq. ft. of common open space per unit. Open Space per Unit: Required, Private: '2_67,574�P Common: I'It)t 1(T Proposed 22 • ********************************* Maximum Allowable Height a) R-1 - 25 feet, maximum 2 stories b) R-2 & R -2B - 30 feet, maximum 2 stories c) R-3 - 35 feet d)—R-P - 35 feet, maximum 3 stories Condominium developments located along walk streets shall not exceed the maximum height of 25 feet within the front half of the lot. Proposed Building Height: %cD/ Note: Height shall be verified by the Building Department during Plan Check. ******************************* Building Setbacks Where garages or parking stalls front on a public street or alley, the minimum setback shall be 17 feet provided roll -up doors are installed; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required shere standard doors are installed. -15"- Setbacks - continued Required Proposed Front: 5 / G�L�I) !Y7 - Rear: t - 2-11-74- Side: '1-74- Side:�`_� Gx — 2' 1O /2_" kdelAi c.ez Parking ! E a) Two parking spaces per unit, minimum dimension of 8 1/2 feet wide by 20 feet deep -enclosed, 8 1/2 feet wide by 18 feet -open. Total• Required: b) One guest space for each two units (round up; e.g. 3 unit site must provide 2 guest spaces). One guest space shall also be required for each on -street parking space eliminated because of new driveways or curb cuts. Total Required: Parking Proposed: a) Spaces per Unit b) Guest Parking -- 2- I Required Turning Radius - 23� Proposed Turning Radius - 2� ********************************* Required 'Sound Insulation Required: a) The minimum wall insulation rating between units shall be 52 STC. b) The minimum floor/ceiling rating between stacked units shall be 58 STC. Proposed Sound Insulation tikbA, Note: Sound Insulation requirement shall be verified by the Building Department during plan check. Storage Area Required per Unit: 'a) 200 cubic feet'of storage area per unit ..4 Storage Area Proposed per Unit - Location of Trash Facilities - Staff Comments: • REVISED - September 1987 Russell E. Barto • AIA Architect 3 Malaga Cove Plaza • Suite 202 • Palos Verdes Estates California • 90274 • (213) 378-1355 November 28, 1988 Kathleen Midstokke City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254- 3885 RE: 1836 Palm Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Kathleen, i Q n'U a f' -• i f 68 C/rY i Hi'Y Clerk 4 Bach J /.-/t, aim We are writing on behalf of our client, Daniel Post of 1836 Palm Avenue, Hermosa Beach; appealing to the City Council the denial of Variance #8811, by the Planning Commission. The meeting took place on Tuesday November 15, 1988. Enclosed is Mr. Post's Check #2555 in the amount of $387.50 to cover the appeal filing fee. This office will submit modified plans to the City Planning staff within the next few days for their review. Thank you for your prompt response to this request. Sincerely, Russell E. Barto, AIA • ciCY OF, HERMOSA BCH ' PROJECT ADDRESS 1836 Palm Avenue 8 1988 Project Name (If applicable) Post Remodel LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 17 Tract 1132 17 Pa. 145 APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name(s) Russell E. Barto. AIA Mailing Address #3 Malaga Cove Plaza Suite 202 Applciant's Relat"•oto Pr•perty ,...4!!!!!„. IvappUMMINIV-__ pow Nut 1.... =wan sus ..a:�� APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ZONING R-2 Phone 378-1355 Architect DATE September '6, 1988 PROJECT REQUEST Conditional Use Permit -Commercial Conditional Use Permit -Condominium Number of Units Development Agreement Environmental Staff Review Final Subdivision • (Parcel/Tract Map) General Plan _ Lot Line Adjustment. _ Lot Split _ Parking Plan Precise Plan _ Specific Plan _ Specific Plan Amendment _ Tentative Subdivision- (Parcel/Tract Map) Zone Change X Zone Variance TOTAL FEES $550.00 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY- Date of submittal: Received by: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT le -car s. ra to a wo car h x1 s ■r r-sidence.- (attach additional pages if •necessary) OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* /� We/I .er,- .pt� (� ) AOC- being duly sworn, depose and say that _we/I are/am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of our/my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and worn before me this Signe ,2 day ofeJ-.�. , 19' . Address • OFFICIAL SEAL • JAMES MCRRIS tA., ,/ 1 R ^ CALIFORMA," Ai.L �7et4ej i(4 ft Le d NOTARY PUBLICSv ,!nTelephone.�Z(3) 3z�'��6 LL in and for the County ` f ?�;=, ifeb.16,:19?1 o f California: i f orn i a . State ry * • Signature required from current property owner, owner c c Russell E. Barto • AIA • Architect 3 Malaga Cove Plaza • Suite 202 • Palos Verdes Estates • California • 90274 • (213) 378-1355 TO: Hermosa Beach Planning Commission RE: Zone Variance Post Addition 1836 Palm Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 . SEP s ig g 1. The house in question sits on an upsloping lot (front to rear). The garage is at the lowest point with the front face l'-0" from the property (as far forward as allowable). The rear wall of the garage is an existing retaining wall supporting the structure above. The only reason we are filing this variance iaAbecause the existing garage is not up to minimum code. 2. Due to the fact that our exising garage is only 17'-6" deep, (minimum required depth is 18'-0") we are required to file a variance or else set our building back 17'-0" from the west (front) property line. This would destroy any possibility of improving our property to the limits allowable to other properties in the same vicinity, granted oy the City of Hermosa Beach. 3. Since the 6" difference in garage depth for which we are seeking a variance is contained in the square footage of the garage and will not be visible to the surrounding neighbors, it will not adversly affect the immediate properties in any way. There will no problem parking cars in the garage area. 4. Because all construction must receive approval by both the City Planning Commission and the Department of Building & Safety, the granting or this variance will not allow any of this project to adversly affect the comprehensive general plan for the city of Hermosa Beach. C C_ MINUTES OF THE STAFF REVIEW MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 6, 1988 IN CITY HALL AT 10:00 A.M. PRESENT: Andy Perea, Associate Planner Wm. Grove, Building & Safety Director Brian Scott, Fire Department Engineer APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Mr. Perea to approve the minutes of September 22, 1988, second by,Engineer Scott. No objections, so ordered. PROJECT VAR 88-11 VARIANCE TO ALLOW GARAGE TO ENCROACH INTO 17' SETBACK AND TO PROVIDE NO GUEST PARKING SPACE AT 1836 PALM AVENUE. Applicant: Maxwell Wuthrich Mr. Perea states that applicant proposes to remodel existing house which presently has a sub -standard one car space. On the garage depth there appears to be a questionable difference of one foot. Variance needed for 17' setback. Mr. Grove finds inconsistencies on plan concerning garage level. Mr. Perea asked how much of the existing building will remain and it was stated changes in the structure would be massive. Mr. Wuthrich after discussing the problems, asked if it would be better to scrap the plans and start a new one but could the city give some consideration for the time they have spent on these plans. Mr. Grove said they didn't make the decisions they just point out what the Commission will look at as a problem. Mr Perea added that they did not want to encourage anyone to be non -conforming and leave two or three walls and build around them. Engineer Scott informed Mr. Wuthrich that whether he had a new structure or a remodeled one they would have to upgrade the hydrant at 19th and Palm, or pay in -lieu fees. Mr. Perea identified no environmental problems associated with the project. Staff would have difficulty recommending the variance without providing guest parking and Mr. Perea suggested revising plans to provide required parking. Motion by Mr. Peres to recommend a Negetative Declaration prepared for the Project Variance 88-11. Seconded by Engineer Scott. No objections, so ordered. -21- Ii (SEAL) I, the undersigned, do dare under penalty of perjury that I did on the .".3n day ofJ195'3 • deposit into the United States post office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as.Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of com= peten't jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those. public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I have executed this declaration on this the ,13 day of /ff6r92/4c/ , l98' at Ilermosa Beach, California. df U S/rN /`1. VP -M EVE12-y (name) '(Signature) (Capacity) State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS On tt e day of I ...1,1.ev , l98 f, before the ersi ned Notary Public, personally app,X red e., ,f, 2,-r proii'ed to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence t be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL JULIANN RAMEY NOTARY PU OLIC-CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN (J( LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires August 29, 1989 tary Public Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 13, 1988) January 3, (1989 Regular Meeting of January 10, 1989 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-4 -- A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT IN THE R-2 ZONE INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL - Recommendation The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the R-2 zone not have a maximum unit number per lot, and that a study of precise development review for all projects over two units be prepared by staff. Background The City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent No. 88-5167 on July 12, 1988 directing staff to study placing a maximum of 2 units per lot in the R-2 zone. Analysis In addition to the analysis in the attached staff report, the following analysis should also be considered. Large Lots There are two large lots in the south end of the City which are designated Medium Density by the General Plan; these lots are zoned M-1 which by staffs' estimation is completely inappropriate for the area considering the abutting densely populated neighborhood, and narrow local streets. If these lots were rezoned to be consistent with the General Plan, Medium Density designation and the maximum of two units, the result would either be lots with an allowed density lower than any other lot in the City, or these lots would be subdivided into smaller lots resulting in row housing with guest parking in the driveway as it typically occurs throughout the City. Of course, the property owner will want to maximize his profit; therefore, the lots will be subdivided into minimum size lots; the resulting density will be slightly less (12 vs 15), but the building layout and amenities will be much less. Quantitative vs Qualitative Development Over the past two years, the City has reduced density considerably via*lot mergers, text amendments and down zoning. However, staff. has discovered that residents are still disgruntled about the kind of development being constructed. The reason is that even though, e.g., a lot can now have only two units instead of 4 units, the developers are simply building two huge units instead of 4 smaller units, and the nearby residents cannot see any distinction, i.e., they now see a 2 or 3 story, practically lot line to lot line development, where once a 900 square feet beach cottage existed. Therefore, staff believes that more density reduction may not be the answer, but instead precise development review for all projects which would include building layout, architectural design and height, should be implemented. Also, the minimum standards for lot coverage, open space and setbacks should be improved. It should be noted that currently condominiums are given analytical review by the staff and the Planning Commission and conditions are imposed via the Conditional Use Permit process; however, apartments are not which is a significant loophole in our zoning ordinance, and should be corrected. Attachments 1. Planning Commission staff report of October 20, 1988. 2. Planning Commission minutes of November 1, 1988. even B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfu ly submitted, Michael chu ach Planning Dir;ctor CITY MANAGER COMMENT:f The above point about "bulk" is certainly valid, but density seems to be an issue as well. The City can seek to improve the level of both, as they are not mutually exclusive. Also, the Council has already requested a study of architecturalreview requirements from Planning. T/ccsr2unt 2 October 20, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission November 1, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-4 -- A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT IN THE R-2 ZONE INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation Staff recommends that the R-2 zone not have a maximum unit number per lot. Background The City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent No. 88-5167 on July 12, 1988 directing staff to study placing a maximum of 2 units per lot in the R-2 zone. Analysis Option By having an R-2 and R -2B zone, the City has the option to place a maximum of two units by zoning the property to R -2B, or allowing more than two by zoning the property R-2. There are several reasons why this feature is desirable as noted below. Equity There are many lots in the City particularly at the north end which are consistently General Planned and zoned for R-2, but they are so small, as a result of our density reduction ordinance, they can only have one unit. Therefore even though they are R-2 zoned, they would have no chance to have more than one unit if there was a cap of 2 units per lot. However, under the current ordinance, they can assemble lots, e.g., three 2,400 sq. ft. lots, which would allow for an additional unit. Conversely, there are a couple exceptionally large lots in the City (20,000 square feet plus) which are zoned R-2 and could have only 2 units under the maximum of 2 unit standard. Of course, these large lots may be subdivided into 4,000 sq. ft. lots if they have the minimum frontage on a street, but this approach would result in a lesser quality design which is the next factor to consider. Design Larger lots generally provide greater opportunity to improve design qualities of a development; better open space, -3- l landscaping, and parking layouts are available and also such as swimming pool, spas and recreation rooms can be Several small lots assembled allowing for an additional many times result in a better quality development. Alternatives 1. Certain size lots in the City could be rezoned R -2B, thus placing a cap of 2 units per lot; the lots that are large enought to have 2 units without assembling lots could be rezoned to R -2B; exceptionally large lots, i.e., those that could be divided into several smaller.(4,000 sq. ft.) lots, could remain R-2. amenities provided. unit will 2. Another density reduction amendment to the R-2 zone is.also possible, and could be studied as part of the revised land use element which will be prepared in thenearfour / T/pcsr2unt 4 Michael Sch ach Planning Director SPECIAL STUDY — MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT IN THE R-2 ZONE Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated October 20, 1988. The City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent No. 88-5167 on July 12, 1988, directing staff to study placing a maximum of two units per lot in the R-2 zone. P.C. Minutes 11/1/88 c By having an R-2 and an R -2B zone, the City has the option to place a maximum of two units by zoning the property to R -2B or allowing more than two units by zoning to R-2. There are several reasons why this feature are desirable. There are many lots in the City, particularly at the north end, which are consistently general planned and zoned for R-2; but they are so small, as a result of the density reduction ordinance, they can have only one unit. Therefore, even though they are zoned R-2, they would have no chance to have more than one unit if there were a cap of two units per lot. However, under the current ordinance, they can assemble lots, that is, three 2400 square foot lots, which would allow for an additional unit. Conversely,,there are a several exceptionally large. lots in the City (20,000 square feet plus) which are zoned R-2 and could have only two units under the maximum two -unit standard. Of course, these large lots may be subdivided into 4000 square foot lots if they have the minimum frontage on a street; but this approach would result in a lesser quality design, which is another factor to consider. • Larger lots generally provide greater opportunity to improve design qualities of a • development; better open space, landscaping, and parking layouts are available as are amenities such as swimming pools, spas; and recreation rooms can be provided. Several small lots assembled allowing for an additional unit will many times result in a better uality development. There are two alternatives: (1) certain sized lots in the City could be rezoned R -2B, thus placing a cap of two units per lot. The lots that are large enough to have two units without assembling lots could be rezoned to R 2 B. Exceptionally large lots, that is, lots which could be divided into several smaller (4000 square foot) lots, could remain R-2; (2) another density reduction amendment to the R-2 zone is also possible and could be studied as part of the revised land use element which will be prepared in the near future. Comm. Ketz asked about the issue of lot assembly and why lots could not be assembled if the maximum is set at two units. Mr. Schubach explained that when the lotsare assembled, there could be two units; 'therefore, no matter what the lot size, there could only be two units. He continued by explaining the lot sizes necessary to accommodate two units. Mr. Schubach stated that many lots are under 3500 square feet; however, they are zoned R-2 so there can be only one unit. If two 3500 square foot lots are assembled, two units would be allowed, merely because the lots would then be large enough. However, nothing would be accomplished by assembling the lots, because there would only be one unit per lot allowed. Under the current code, three lots could be assembled, and four units would be allowed. However, if a maximum were adopted, only two units would be allowed. Comm. Ketz asked whether there was ever a time when there was a maximum of two units allowed in the R-2 zone. Mr. Schubach stated that at one time there was a maximum; however, it also allowed two units on a 2400 square foot lot, which equates to 37 units per acre, which is over the maximum of 25 units per acre. Mr. Schubach continued by discussing the square footages allowed. - 6 _ P.C. Minutes 11/1/88 /� Chmn. Peirce stated that the issue is to determine whether it is desirable to allow multiple -family dwellings in areas which are predominantly two-family dwellings. Even though the density would be the same, the issue comes down to the bulk and mass of the larger units. Chmn. Rue felt that if a lot or combination of lots is large enough to accommodate different types of projects, those projects would not necessarily be any more bulky. The project may combine to give more open space and better amenities in certain instances. He did not feel this would happen that often; when it does happen, he did not feel it would be a problem. He stated that there are standards in place; if the standards are not valid, that issue should be addressed. He did not feel that the combining of lots and building to R-2 standards with the density allowed Is an undesirable practice. He noted that R -2B standards are also in place. • Comm. Inge11 agreed, stating that he does not feel a•maximum unit number per lot is necessary. •He stated that larger complexes could be more desirable developments in certain instances. Comm. Ketz stated that if the lots are very large, multi -unit dwellings would be acceptable; however, she noted that many very large projects are being built to the very minimum standards. Chmn. Peirce stated that he is torn on this issue, explaining that many people are concerned that condominium developments destroy the character of the neighborhoods; however, more amenities could be possible. He questioned the feasibility of imposing a conditional use permit process on each of these projects, so that they could be addressed on a project -by -project basis. Comm. Rue stated that condominiums currently require a conditional use permit. Comm. Ingell noted, however, that apartments are of real concern at this time, since they do not need any review. Mr. Schubach stated that the apartment issue will be studied by staff very soon. Jim Housley, 934 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that his impression of the City Council's reason for requesting this study was to prevent very large developments in two - unit neighborhoods. He felt that their concern also relates to parking and associated problems with apartments. Mr. Schubach stated that the main concern involves bulk, not just the number of units. He stated that the bulk problem will not be corrected merely by reducing the number of units. Mr. Housley suggested, then, that there should be a maximum square footage allowed in order to address the bulk problem. Mr. Schubach stated that staff is currently studying height, setbacks, and the review process for condominiums as well as apartments. Mr. Schubach discussed the conditional use permit issue, and stated that he would prefer to see a precise development plan review to address all new developments, especially since environmental assessments are not required on many of these developments. P.C. Minutes 11 /1/88 C C MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Rue, to approve staff's recommendation that the R-2 zone not have a maximum number of units per lot. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION by Comm. Ingell as maker, and agreed to by Comm. Rue as second, to direct staff to return with a study on the inclusion of a precise development plan review for all multiple -unit developments of two units or more. Comm. Ketz stated that she would vote against the motion, explaining that she did not feel a precise development plan review gives the Planning Commission the authority to decrease the density. If it is a three -unit development in an area which is only duplexes or single family, someone cannot be told they can build only a duplex. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Peirce NOES: Comm. Ketz ABSTAIN: • None ABSENT: Comm. Edwards Chmn. Peirce stated that the study should also include a distinction between two units and less and three units and more in order to determine where the break -off point is. P.C. Minutes 11 /1 /88 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council January 12, 1989 City Council Meeting January 24, 1989 CONSIDERATION OF REFUSE CONTRACT ALTERNATIVES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council: 1) Direct staff to negotiate a five year extension to the current contract for refuse removal with Browning-Ferris Industries. 2) Provide staff with input as to desired amendments to level of refuse service. BACKGROUND The term of the current refuse contract with Browning-Ferris In- dustries (BFI) expires on June 30, 1989. The contract may be re- newed for an additional five (5) years at the exclusive discre- tion of the City of Hermosa Beach upon terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by both parties. The refuse contract grants to BFI an exclusive franchise for the removal of all residential and commercial refuse generated within the city boundaries.The current refuse contract commenced on July 1, 1986 and was the sixth amendment to an agreement originally entered into in June of 1970 with ABCO Disposal, a company later acquired by BFI. ANALYSIS The contractual relationship with BFI has been, in staff's opinion, a good one for the citizens of Hermosa Beach. They have consistently been provided with an excellent level of refuse ser- vice at rates that are lower or comparable to other cities in the South Bay. The city has received very few complaints regarding the opera- tions of BFI and any concerns have been addressed in a timely manner. Due to their excellent track record, staff believes it is ap- propriate to negotiate terms to extend the current contract as opposed to soliciting bids for refuse removal services. The advantages of negotiating for an extension to the current contract are as follows: 1 1 0 1) The current refuse contractor is a "known quantity". The level of service is known and the capabilities of the con- tractor have been established. 2) No disruption to service or billing problems inherent with switching contractors. 3) Familiarity of the current contractor with the conditions and problems of Hermosa Beach refuse collection. 4) Ability to utilize contractors expertise in refuse removal to increase level of service where desired or appropriate. The main disadvantage associated with extending the contract as opposed to open bidding is the public perception that a better rate would result from open bidding. For a service contract, the lowest bid is not necessarily the best bid in any case. Attached to this report, for information purposes, are a survey of refuse services and charges for other south bay cities and a copy of the current refuse contract. Items that staff believes would be appropriate to explore in negotiations to extend the current refuse contract include the following: 1) Inclusion of refuse pickup at city facilities at no cost to the city (approximately $48,000 current annual cost) 2) Replacement of once monthly large item pickup with large item pickup as part of weekly service. 3) Possible pickup of public refuse containers located throughout the city. 4) Provision of a household hazardous waste hotline to provide information regarding appropriate sources for household hazardous waste disposal. 5) Use of alternate large capacity refuse receptacles for residential accounts. 6) Recycling. Any other items to increase the level of service or reduce city costs that the City Council would like considered can be included in the negotiations. ALTERNATIVES Direct staff to prepare an RFP to solicit bids for residential and commercial refuse removal. This alternative would also re- quire City Council direction as to the level of service desired. 2 Concur: Respectfully submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 3 BACKGROUND MATERIALS CITY REFUSE COLLECTION SURVEY (JANUARY 1989) Large 3 yd. Monthly P/U Item Comm. bin- Fee/Unit Weekly P/U Franchise 1/Week Redondo Beach 8.10 1 Weekly no Gardena 6.35 1 1/year no Carson 10.50 1 2/year no Torrance 9.75 1 1/year no Lawndale 9.35 2 weekly no Manhattan Beach SFR 8.27 1 Dupl 15.68 Trip 18.02 weekly yes 60.37 Hawthorne 9.05 1 2/year yes 92.90 Hermosa Beach 7.23 1 1/month yes 59.58 Waste Systems BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES Los Angeles District CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Schedule of Rates for Trash Removal Service Commercial, Professional, Industrial Firms, and Apartment Complexes July 1988 YARDS 1/WK 2/WK 3/WK 4/WK 5/WK 6/WK 7/WK 1 YD 38.30 57.49 76.65 95.83 114.84 134.13 156.94 1.5 YD 42.58 63.86 85.14 106.71 127.75 170.99 200.05 2 YD 51.12 78.82 106.48 134.13 157.59 181.02 211.79 3 YD 59.58 91.54 123.51 155.44 187.35 219.27 256.55 4 YD 71.50 109.87 165.86 186.78 224.85 263.17 307.91 6 YD 89.40 137.33 185.29 233.18 281.06 328.95 384.88 ROLL -OFF RATE $31.26 Delivery fee $133.94 per load plus disposal fee RESIDENTIAL RATE $7.23 per single family dwelling 14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P 0. BOX 2438 • GARDENA. CALIFORNIA 90247 • (213) 329-4115 Waste Systems BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES Los Angeles Distnct PROPOSED SHARE LOT USER RATES NAME ADDRESS CURRENT PROPOSED RATE RATE Bamboo Hut 36 Pier Ave $59.99 $62.51 Bank of America 90 Pier Ave 71.44 74.44 Coast Drugs 58 Pier Ave 31.59 32.92 Dianas 4 Pier Ave 67.86 70.71 End Zone 22 Pier Ave 100.17 104.38 Hennessy's 8 Pier Ave 28.72 29.93 Hermosa Fish 20 Pier Ave 43.42 45.24 Hermosa Hotel 26 Pier Ave 66.12 68.90 Lighthouse 30 Pier Ave 96.83 100.90 Pier Market 50 Pier Ave 58.45 60.90 Pier 52 52 Pier Ave 95.77 99.79 Robert's 74 Pier Ave 34.05 35.48 Shirt Tales 34 Pier Ave 10.54 10.98 Sushi Sei 50 Pier Ave 101.11 105.36 Polar Bear 68 Pier Ave 94.78 98.76 Avanti Jewlers 31 Pier Ave 11.97 12.47 Beach Store 59 Pier Ave 25.14 26.20 Cantina Real 19 Pier Ave 62.84 65.48 Casa Blanca 53 Pier Ave 77.12 80.36 Citicorp 81 Pier Ave 36.00 37.51 Hermosa Cycle 53 Pier Ave 12.96 13.50 Hermosa Tackle 21 Pier Ave 8.97 9.35 14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA. CALIFORNIA 90247 • (213) 329-4115 Page 2 Ii Boccaccio 39 Pier Ave 98.01 102.13 Jeannes 73 Pier Ave 24.30 25.32 Lovy & Dovy 49 Pier Ave 12.74 13.28 Mermaid 11 Pier Ave 118.53 123.51 Paradise Sushi 53 Pier Ave 37.48 39.05 Pier Surf 25 Pier Ave 7.19 7.49 Shear Art 49 Pier Ave 13.07 13.62 Sugar Babies 53 Pier Ave 12.96 13.50 Pacific Screen 65 Pier Ave 26.81 27.94 Bey Company 1 1233 Hermosa 12.14 12.65 Bijou Cinema 1233 Hermosa 82.09 - 85.54 Easy Reader 1233 Hermosa 36.06 37.57 Michael J Video 1233 Hermosa 3.92 4.08 Harbor Blues 1235 Hermosa 16.22 16.90 Hermosa Cycle 20 13th St 21.49 22.39 West Bay Apts 30 13th St 40.33 42.02 La Playita 16 14th St 89.47 93.23 Good Stuff 1286 Strand 74.83 77.97 Jeffers 1338 Strand 3.74 3.90 Pacific Strand 1328 Strand 12.56 13.09 Perrys 1318 Strand 64.18 66.88 Poop Deck 1272 Strand 67.39 70.22 REFUSE CONTRACT - 1986 THIS AGREEMENT made this llth day of March , 1986 , between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter re- ferred to as "CONTRACTOR". WHEREAS, on the 16th day of June 1970, CITY and ABCO Disposal Corporation did enter into an Agreement for Refuse Collection in the City of Hermosa Beach ("Refuse Contract"), which Refuse Con- tract was amended by Amendment No. 1 on the 8th day of May, 1971; Amendment No. 2 on the 21st day of November, 1972; Amendment No. 3 on the 2nd day of January, 1974; and Amendment No.4 on the 1st day of August, 1978; and WHEREAS, said contract was restated on the 25th day of August, 1981; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties to replace the Restated Contract with this Agreement which shall supercede the Restated Contract; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to provide the refuse collection service in accordance with the rules, regula- tions and specifications set forth in this Agreement and at all times during the term of this Agreement to comply with all ap- plicable CITY ordinances and further to perform each covenant and agreement contained herein in an efficient and businesslike man- ner; and WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR realizes that it is acting on behalf of the CITY in providing the service of refuse collection and as such it will always direct its employees to conduct themselves in accordance with the standards of conduct required of CITY em- ployees and furthermore to utilize generally accepted public relations techniques in the performance of duties; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to provide for a method of reasonable increases or decreases as they may be justified during the life of the contract; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Agreement of give the CONTRACTOR the exclusive right to pick up refuse from all locations in CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term of Agreement The term of this Agreement shall commence on the 1st day of July, 1986, and end on the 30th day of June, 1989, and may be renewed for an additional five (5) years at the exclusive discretion of the CITY upon terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by both 1 parties. 2. Duties of CONTRACTOR The CONTRACTOR promises to perform its duties in good and work- manlike manner in strict compliance with the Rules, Regulations and Specifications for the Collection of Refuse, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Rates and Franchise Fee A. Schedule of Rates. The parties agree that CONTRACTOR shall, for the term of this Agreement, cause to be billed and col- lected all charges made or incurred by Residential, Apart- ment, Commercial, Manufacturing, and all customers in the City of Hermosa Beach, and in this regard CONTRACTOR agrees that no free service (except as approved by CITY) will be granted and all services rendered shall be billed in accor- dance with the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached here- to and incorporated herein by reference. B. Franchise Fee. CONTRACTOR, as part of the consideration of this Agreement, agrees to pay to CITY at the time and in the manner set forth in •Paragraph E below, a sum equal to ten percent (107) of the Gross Receipts for providing refuse service within the city. C. Definition of Gross Receipts. "Gross Receipts", as referred to in Paragraph B hereinabove, is defined as all monies col- lected as a result of the billing for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and any subsequent amendments, except that CONTRACTOR agrees pursuant to Paragraph A above, that no free service will be granted (except as approved by CITY); AND, further, CONTRACTOR agrees that all services granted will be duly and regularly billed; and, further, except that CONTRACTOR shall make a diligent effort to as- sure that all billings made and performed shall be collected by CONTRACTOR and that no billing shall be deemed uncollec- table until all reasonable remedies for the collection thereof have been exhausted. In accordance with the CITY's Ordinance No. 80-644, CONTRACTOR shall bill the Property Owner for all services already rendered and not otherwise collected. D. Lien Provision. The CITY agrees to cooperate with the CONTRACTOR in placing bills deemed uncollectable pursuant to Paragraph C hereinabove on the property tax bill as a lien. The CON- TRACTOR shall be responsible for any process or fees neces- sary to accomplish the lien. 2 If the CITY incurs any costs as a result of placing uncol- lectable bills on the property tax bill, the CONTRACTOR agrees to reimburse the CITY for said costs. E. Time of Payment to City: CONTRACTOR shall pay to CITY the amounts owed pursuant to Paragraph B above on or before the 90th day following the billing date, and each 30 days thereafter on monies collected. 4. Re -Negotiation of Rates The rates which may be charged by CONTRACTOR and the fees which are to be paid by CONTRACTOR to CITY for the second and subse- quent years of the term of this Agreement, and any extensions thereof, shall be adjusted by an amount up to the percentage rate as reflected in the Consumer Price Index (Transportation Group) Los Angeles - Long Beach area as published in April of each year by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), not to exceed ten percent (10%) annually, with such ad- justments to be effective July 1 of each year. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY true and correct copies of the CPI which reflects the percentage increase to verify the rate adjustment. In addi- tion to the above, CONTRACTOR may petition the CITY at any time for additional rate and price adjustments at reasonable times on the basis of unusual changes in cost of operations, such as re- vised laws, ordinances, or regulations; changes in location of disposal sites or changes in disposal charges; and for other reasons. 5. Number of Units CONTRACTOR will be notified of all new or changed occupancies as CITY becomes aware of same through issuance of its Certificate of Occupancy. 6. CONTRACTOR's Exclusive Right to Service Apartment Complexes, Commercial and Industrial and Professional Establishments A. In accordance with the duties of the CONTRACTOR set forth in Section 2 above, no pick up schedule shall be less than those provided in the rules, regulations, and specifica- tions. CONTRACTOR, at no cost to the CITY, shall make di- rect billing and collect payment for its services from such Establishment. 3 B. CONTRACTOR will furnish and service trash compactors for any of CONTRACTOR's Commercial and Apartment Complex customers, if desired by such customer, on terms to be mutually agreed upon by CONTRACTOR and such Commercial or Apartment Complex customer. 7. Default A. In the event of default by either party of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the other party shall give Notice in writing setting out such default, served in accor- dance with Section 10 set forth hereinfter, and if said de- fault is not cured within thirty (30) days of the date of mailing said Notice, then in addition to any other legal remedy, the following specific remedies are available: 1) Injunction relief or damages. 2) In the event of a default or defaults not cured within thirty (30) days, then such default or defaults shall be presumed to be a major breach of contract and this Agreement may be terminated by the injured party. 3) In the event the CONTRACTOR defaults and fails to rea- sonably perform the services required of the CONTRAC- TOR, to Apartment Complexes, Commercial, Industrial and Professional Establishments, the CITY Council may issue additional licenses to pick up said Establishments and terminate the exclusive right of the CONTRACTOR to negotiate with and serve said Apartment Complexes, Com- mercial, Industrial and Professional Establishments. 4) In the event of litigation, the successful party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees. 8. Non -Discrimination Clause CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate in matters of hiring or other matters on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or marital status; nor shall he have business dealings with a person, firm or corporation who so discriminates. 9. Insurance and Bonds A. Liability Insurance. Additionally to and independently of all other provisions of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall, at its own cost and expense forthwith after the execution hereof, procure a policy or policies of comprehensive public liability and property damage insurance, with limits of not less than $1,000,00.00 for injuries to or death of any one (1) person and $2,000,000.00 for injuries to or death of any two (2) or more persons, and $250,000.00 for damage to one (1) individual's property and $500,000.00 for two (2) or more persons' property damage. The terms of said policies may be for such period as shall be designated by CITY; pro- vided, however, CONTRACTOR shall procure other policies of said insurance so that between the execution of this Agree- ment and commencement of the Agreement, and throughout the entire contract term or any renewal thereof, or until the sooner termination thereof, CONTRACTOR shall always have such required insurance coverage. Certificates of said in- surance, together with the receipts for the payment of pre- miums for the term thereof, shall be delivered to CITY within ten (10) days after the execution of this Agreement, and thereafter within thirty (30) days prior to the expira- tion of the term of each such policy. Said policies shall contain a "non -cancellation without notice" clause and shall provide that copies of all cancellation notices shall be sent to CITY. To the extent permitted by law CONTRACTOR may provide for all or part of the required insurance under a plan of self-insurance. B. Bonds. CONTRACTOR shall post with the CITY and keep in full TT5FEe and effect during the term of this Agreement a Perfor- mance Bond issued by a nationally recognized surety company which will guarantee the full and faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement in an amount equal to $50,000.00. C. Workers' Compensation. The CONTRACTOR shall at all times keep fully insured, at his own expense, all persons employed by it in connection with this Agreement as required by the "Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Act" of the State of California. CONTRACTOR shall at any time, upon demand, produce to the CITY Manager evidence that it is ful- ly and properly insured as required by said act. 10. Definitions CITY shall mean the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CONTRACTOR shall mean Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., or its successor in interest. REFUSE shall mean all waste from and incidental to the use of homes, residences, dwelling units, commercial or professional establishments including, but not limited to, newspapers, maga- zines, wrappings, discarded clothing, empty packing cases, pack- ing material such as paper, hay, straw, shavings, excelsior, met- als, bottles, ashes, broken glass, garbage, garden and yard trim- mings, leaves, and other household refuse. Not included in the definition of refuse is any dead animal, dirt or earth. Construction or industrial waste materials such as plaster, lumber, bricks, tiles, or fixtures, resulting from building construction, alterations, or manufacturing processes 'shall not be considered household refuse when in excess of seven- ty-five (75) pounds in total weight and not contained in an ap- proved refuse container. SPECIAL REFUSE shall mean furniture, appliances, television sets, water heater tanks, refrigerators, stoves, davenports, sinks, lawn furniture, doors', windows, screens, mattresses, beds, rugs and pads, which are incidental to family living and which may exceed seventy-five (75) pounds in weight and/or forty-eight (48) inches in length. MISCELLANEOUS REFUSE shall mean newspapers, magazines and flat- tened cartons tied securely in bundles by means of heavy twine, rope or wire, not exceeding seventy-five (75) pounds in weight per bundle nor forty-eight (48) inches in length; branches, cut- tings and brush similarly bundled and limited to forty-eight (48) inches in length and seventy-five (75) pounds in weight, and domestic items not suitable for containers, but weighing less than seventy-five (75) pounds and less than forty-eight (48) inches in length, to include bundled rugs and carpets, bicycles, toys, etc. COMMERCIAL, PROFESSIONAL, INDUSTRIAL AND APARTMENT COMPLEX ES- TABLISHMENTS, sometimes herein referred to as "RECIPIENT OF SER- VICE", "CUSTOMER", and "ESTABLISHMENT", shall be defined to mean: 1. Commercial Establishments shall mean any Es- tablishment within the CITY limits licensed by the CITY, State, Federal Governments or their agencies; however, oil wells are not included in this definition. Trailer courts, motels, and hotels along with manufacturing Establishments are included in this definition. 2. Professional Establishments shall mean any office or facility within the CITY limits occupied by a person or persons practicing a profession for which a license is issued by the CITY, State or Federal Government or agencies therof. 3. Apartment Complex Establishment shall mean any grouping of ten (10) or more dwelling units upon a parcel of property, whether owned singly or severally. Where a parcel of property contains more than one (1) classifica- tion of establishments, each establishment shall be treated ac- cording to its own classification. APARTMENT HOUSE SERVICE shall mean collection of refuse from li- censed apartments containing at least three (3) but less than ten (10) dwelling units. DWELLING UNIT shall mean one (1) or more rooms designed for oc- cupancy by one (1) family for living or sleeping purposes: 6 bachelor apartment shall be considered as a dwelling unit, however, maids quarters shall not. APARTMENT shall mean a room or a suite or two (2) or more rooms in a multiple dwelling, occupied or suitable for occupancy as a dwelling unit for one (1) family. UNIT - RESIDENTIAL SERVICE shall be deemed to equal to one (1) for each one (1) family dwelling and two (2) for each two (2) family dwelling (duplex) which has been initially occupied. UNIT - APARTMENT HOUSE SERVICE shall be deemed to equal one (1) for each apartment dwelling on any parcels of property containing more than three (3) but less than ten (10) such dwellings, (over ten (10) units are treated as commercial establishments) NOTICE shall be deemed given to the parties herein if mailed, certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: TO CONTRACTOR: Browning-Ferris Industries of California,Inc. P.O. Box 2438 Gardena, California 90247 TO CITY: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Hall, Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attention City Manager Property Owner- Record title owner of a Dwelling Unit. 11. Assignment of Agreement The Agreement entered into herein shall not be assignable without the consent of the CITY Council and shall be assignable only upon such terms and conditions as the CITY Council may require. Should the CONTRACTOR violate this provision of this Agreement, the CITY may terminate this Agreement upon giving the CONTRACTOR thirty (30) days written Notice as required in Section 10 hereof, but shall not be entitled to any damages for the violation of this provision alone. The CITY's right to damages in the event of a default in any other provision of the Agreement by the CON- TACTOR shall not be limited by this provision. 12. Lawsuits CONTRACTOR shall defend the city and pay any judgement which may be obtained against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers or employees either alone or jointly with said CONTRACTOR, his agents or employees, for injury or damage to persons or property by reason of the performance or nonperformance of the terms of this Agreement; provided that if the CITY alone be sued for such injury or damage, notice in writing, as required in Section 10 - 7 hereof, shall be given to the CONTRACTOR to appear and defend such action. 13. Waivers No acquiescence, failure, or neglect of either of the contracting parties to insist on strict performance of any or all of the terms hereof shall be considered or constitute a waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement, or any performance required hereunder, or of any remedy, damages, or other right arising out of such refusal, neglect or inability to perform at any time. 14. Severability Should any part, clause, provision or condition of this Agreement be held to be void, invalid, or inoperative by any court of competent jurisdiction, then such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions hereof and the remaining provisions shall be effective as though such invalid part, clause, provision or con- dition had not been so made. 15. Miscellaneous Matters A. As further consideration of this Agreement, CITY agrees to annually supply to CONTRACTOR a current register of all le- gal addresses on file. CONTRACTOR agrees to annually supply CITY with a computer run of all monthly billings, and, upon termination of this Agreement, a current computer run of all accounts on file. B. CITY agrees to cooperate reasonably with CONTRACTOR in the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Agreement, except that such cooperation shall not be to the extent that it will cost CITY any additional administrative expense; and, further, CITY agrees to enact reasonable laws necessary to empower CITY to perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. C. Within ten (10) days after the billing of any respective account during the term of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall furnish CITY a statement showing the total amount billed, total amount received on all accounts by CONTRACTOR, plus a statement certified to be correct by CONTRACTOR for the gross receipts for the previous month. Such certification may be made by any officer of the CONTRACTOR corporation, verifying that said figures are correct. On or before July 1 of each year during the term of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall cause an audit of his business to be made by a li- censed public accountant or a certified public accountant and shall forthwith upon completion of such audit furnish to the CITY, without any expense or cost to the CITY, one of the following, to -wit: (at the option of CONTRACTOR, either of the following may be presented to the CITY). 8 (1) A copy of said certified audit. (ii) A statement from the accountant preparing said audit setting forth the figures, as determined by said audit, relating to the following matters: total sums billed by CONTRACTOR on all accounts being billed as required by this Agreement, total sums collected thereunder, total amounts due and payable to CITY under this Agreement, and the balances due and payable from customers billed, and the balances, if any, due and payable to CITY. In the event such audit disclose that monies paid pursuant to this Agreement are less than monies obligated to be paid pursuant to this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall immediately pay the deficiency to CITY. CITY may, at its sole discretion, at any time, cause an audit of the business of CONTRACTOR to be made by a licensed public accountant, and if the statements of gross receipts or gross bil- lings previously made to CITY shall be found to be less than the amount disclosed by said audit then CONTRACTOR shall immediately pay additional monies required to be paid to CITY, and if said deficiency exceeds the sum of $200.00 per year, CONTRACTOR shall pay the cost of such audit; otherwise the cost of said audit shall be paid by CITY. D. This Agreement is made pursuant to and to be interpreted according to the laws of the State of California and all parties agree to comply with all applicable provisions thereof. E. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY from any claims, suits, damages, liabilities or expenses result- ing from the CONTRACTOR's discontinuing service at any location. F. Notwithstanding any other provisions, CONTRACTOR agrees that service to any location in the CITY may be terminated by the CONTRACTOR only: (1) if such customer has failed to pay charges imposed by the CONTRACTOR for at least 90 days; or (2) upon prior consent of the CITY Manager at any earlier time. 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said CITY has hereunto caused its corpo- rate name to be hereunto subscribed and its official seal to be hereunto affixed by its proper officers first thereunto duly au- thorized, and the said CONTRACTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal as of the day and year first hereinabove written. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: i r' CITY Attorney (SEAL) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, a,-MtiiiipTpal Corporation N�ayor CONTRACTOR BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. By :4d( EXHIBIT A RULES AND REGULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COLLECTION OF REFUSE All work done and services rendered shall be in accordance with the following specifications: 1. DEFINITIONS CITY is the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CONTRACTOR is the person, firm or corporation having a contract with the City of Hermosa Beach for the work mentioned in these specifications. REFUSE shall mean all waste from and incidental to the use of homes, residences, dwelling units, commercial or professional establishments, including but not limited to newspapers, maga- zines, wrappings, discarded clothing, empty packing cases, pack- ing materials such as paper, hay, straw, shavings, excelsior, metals, bottles, ashes, broken glass, garbage, garden and yard trimmings, leaves and other household refuse. Not included in the definition of refuse are any dead anmials, dirt or earth. Construction or industrial waste material such as plaster, lumber, bricks, tile or fixtures resulting from building construction, alterations or manufacturing processes shall not be considered household refuse when in excess of seventy-five (75) pounds in total weight and not contained in an approved refuse container. SPECIAL REFUSE shall mean furniture, appliances, television sets, water heater tanks, refrigerators, stoves, davenports, sinks, lawn furniture, doors, windows, screens, mattresses, beds, rugs and pads, which are incidental to family living and which exceed seventy-five (75) pounds in weight and/or forty-eight (48) inches in length. MISCELLANEOUS REFUSE shall mean newspapers, magazines and flat- tened cartons tied securely in bundles by means of heavy twine, rope or wire, not exceeding seventy-five (75) pounds in weight per bundle nor forty-eight (48) inches in length; branches, cut- tings and brush similarly bundled and limited to forty-eight (48) inches in length and seventy-five (75) pounds in weight; and domestic items not suitable for containers but weighing less than seventy-five (75) pounds and less than forty-eight (48) inches in length, to include bundled rugs and carpets, bicycles and toys. II. FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION All refuse shall be collected at frequences not less than those specified in these rules and regulations. The frequency of col- lection currently established is as follows: A. Refuse and Miscellaneous Refuse - At least once in each cal- endar week. B. Market Refuse - At least once in each calendar week. C. Special Refuse - The CONTRACTOR shall survey the CITY and collect all Special Refuse on the first Saturday of every month. In the event that said Saturday is a holiday, as elsewhere defined, CONTRACTOR shall make arrangements for a Special Refuse collection on the next following Saturday. However, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for collecting and disposing of all Christmas trees, regardless of size, within the CITY under payment provisions of the normal residential and apartment house collection service. This is to include, but not be limited to, trees deposited in vacant lots, city parks, and rights of way, in addition to those left with normally scheduled refuse collection. III. PERIOD OF COLLECTION All collection of refuse shall be made during the following hours: A. Residential - All collections must be made between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. B. Commercial - All collections must be made between the hours of 6:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M., except that collections on Pacific Coast Highway, Pier Avenue, and in the central busi- ness district (Beach drive to Manhattan Avenue, from Tenth Street to Fifteenth Street) shall be made during other, or more, limited hours if required by the CITY Manager. IV. BIN SERVICE A. The CITY may, upon giving of notice thirty (30) days in ad- vance, require CONTRACTOR to remove bins from premises or public property for any cause, and may require immediate removal if CITY determines hazardous conditions exist. The CITY shall be the sole determinant of the necessity to have bins removed. B. The CONTRACTOR shall not discontinue service or remove any bin from an establishment without first receiving permission to do so from the CITY. C. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for proper maintenance of all bins (belonging to him). This shall include but not - 12 - C. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for proper maintenance of all bins (belonging to him). This shall include but not be limited to insuring operable and flush fitting lids, regularly scheduled cleaning to prevent odors, and periodic painting to prevent rust. In the event of a dispute, the CITY Manager or his designated representative will be the final judge if reasonable maintenance is needed on said bins. In any case, all bins shall be renovated at least once each year. D. The CITY may review the location of bins at individual es- tablishments, and may require CONTRACTOR to place bins in another area or manner. V. PLACE OF DISPOSAL The CONTRACTOR, under this notice, must contemplate the removal and disposal of such refuse at a place and in a manner to be de- vised by the CONTRACTOR, but outside of the City of Hermosa Beach. CONTRACTOR must be prepared to prove to the satisfaction of the CITY Manager that he is in a position to provide such place of disposal for the period covered by this contract. VI. VEHICLES USED AND CARE REQUIRED A. All trucks, trailers and other conveyances or equipment used to collect refuse shall at all times be kept clean, in good repair, and well painted, to the satisfaction of the CITY Manager. The collector's name or firm name, together with his telephone number, shall be printed or painted in legible letters not less than three inches in height, on both sides of all trucks and conveyances used to collect refuse. B. Collection Vehicles - Type All refuse collection vehicles shall be of a load packing variety capable of accomodating refuse up to forty-eight (48) inches in length, with watertight bodies so that no material shall leak or be spilled from the vehicle on the streets or alleys of the City of Hermosa Beach. C. Equipment Maintenance and Inspection CONTRACTOR shall make available for inspection by the CITY his collection vehicles after receiving a forty-eight (48) hour written notice of the same. The inspection will in- clude mechanical, sanitary and aesthetic factors. Deficien- cies will be required to be corrected. D. - Smog Device Required Each and every vehicle operated by CONTRACTOR in the City of Hermosa Beach shall be equipped with a functioning and prop- erly maintained smog control device of a type certified by the State of California in the Health and Safety Code. E. CONTRACTOR's Responsibility for Cleanliness of Operation Refuse vehicles shall not be stored within the boundaries of the CITY for more than two (2) hours without the specific permission of the CITY Manager having been previously ob- tained, unless prevented from moving by mechanical difficul- ties. Under no circumstances are collection vehicles to be regularly stored within the CITY limits. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for cleaning from the streets and collection places all refuse spillage resulting from the CONTRACTOR's operation. Each truck shall be equipped with an adequate shovel and broom for this purpose. In addition, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for remov- ing and cleaning all oil, grease, paint, glass or other sub- stance upon the public streets due to equipment failure or refuse leakage resulting from refuse operations. If said spillage is not cleaned promptly and thoroughly by the CON- TRACTOR, the CITY may clean up sme and duduct the cost thereof from the amount due said CONTRACTOR. F. Personnel - Refrain from Use of Profanity CONTRACTOR's employees, in the performance of the duties herein called for, shall refrain from the use of profanity, loud talk or boisterous conduct which may annoy house- holders, and all work done pursuant to these specifications shall be carried on with the least possible disturbance or annoyance to residents of the CITY. G. Noise Level Each and every vehicle operated by CONTRACTOR in the City of Hermosa Beach shall comply with any and all laws and regula- tions of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach concerning permissible noise levels. VII. PLACING OF REFUSE The CONTRACTOR, under the provisions of these specifications herein contained, shall perform his services in accordance with the provisions of the applicable ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach pertaining to the collection and disposal of all refuse. All refuse to be collected must be placed on, near, or adjacent to the curb line of a street upon which the business establish- ment or residence abuts, and the CONTRACTOR herein shall not be required to enter any private buildings, dwellings or business - 14 - establishments for the collection of refuse therefrom. CONTRACTOR shall carefully replace container to its proper place after emptying. The collector, his agents and employees shall not throw refuse containers from the truck to the pavement, or in any other way break or damage or roughly handle same. CONTRACTOR shall be charged for any unreasonable damage to containers, upon the determination of the CITY Manager or his designated representative. VIII. FAILURE OF CONTRACTOR TO COLLECT REFUSE Should the CONTRACTOR to whom the contract is let for the collec- tion of refuse fail to collect and remove any refuse which shall be properly set out and in proper containers at the time required of him, the City of Hermosa Beach may collect and dispose of the same, or cause it to be collected and disposed of, and may bill the CONTRACTOR for the expense of so doing, provided, however, that the CITY shall first make reasonable efforts to notify CON- TRACTOR by telephone or other informal means. IX. WEEKLY INQUIRY AS TO COMPLAINTS CONTRACTOR shall maintain a telephone, listed in the telephone directory in the firm name by which he is most commonly known and under the name "City of Hermosa Beach -Refuse Collection," and shall at all times during the hours between 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 Noon, and 1 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. each day except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, have some person at said telephone for the answer- ing of inquiries and by whom the complaints may be received from property owners and tenants of the City of Hermosa Beach. The telephone of said contractor shall be on exchanges of the areas served or a toll free number, and in no case shall the people of the areas served be required to pay a toll charge to telephone said CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain a written log of all such complaints, the date thereof, and the action taken pur- suant thereto, or the reason for non -action. Such log of com- plaints shall be open to the inspection of the CITY Manager or his designated representative at all reasonable times. CONTRAC- TOR shall, in person or by agent, report to or visit the office of the CITY Manager or his designated representative at least once each week for the purpose of receiving such orders, direc- tions and complaints in regard to the performance of his contract as required. X. ROUTES AND CHANGES CONTRACTOR shall prepare and file with the CITY Manager a com- plete map of the refuse disposal district or districts within the City of Hermosa Beach. He shall indicate thereon in an appropri- ate and easily understandable manner and to the satisfaction and approval of the CITY Manager the days on which collections of refuse shall be made throughout the CITY , in residential and - 15 - commercial areas respectively. However, CONTRACTOR shall en- deavor to maintain existing collection scheduling. CONTRACTOR at his own expense shall publish in bold and legible type printing at least one time in a newspaper or newspapers of local circulation and/or by such other means as may be determined by the CITY Manager to be necessary the districts and streets and the days of the week on which refuse shall be collected, and shall furnish to the CITY an adequate supply of such schedule. Such published notice shall first be submitted to and approved by the CITY Manager of the City of Hermosa Beach. Similar notices shall be published upon the making of any subsequent changes in collection schedules. Thereafter, before any change in collection schedule is made by CONTRACTOR, he shall provide said CITY Manager with a new map as hereinabove described embodying such changes, and he shall also, at his own expense, notify the residents and establishments of the district of such new schedule ten (10) days before change becomes effective, in the manner hereinabove described. Any other type of change affecting refuse collection service shall also be published and communicated to the public as re- quired in all pararaphs of this section. XI. NON -COLLECTION When any refuse is not collected by the CONTRACTOR, he shall leave a tag on which he has indicated the reason for his refusal to collect the refuse, giving reference to the CITY Ordinance or to the section of rules and regulations, or contract, which has been violated and which gives grounds for his refusal. This in- formation shall be either in writing or by means fo a check sys- tem. The tag shall carry the CONTRACTOR's business or firm name and his telephone number, and shall be securely fastened to the container or the article refused. However, any container which does not conform to the standards established in the Hermosa Beach CITY CODE by reason of either original design or deterioration shall be serviced and so tagged. In the event that such containers are subsequently used to store refuse, CONTRACTOR shall do that which is necessary to collect and dispose of same. A record shall be kept of all places where it becomes necessary to tag and collect such containers. XII. WORK TO BE DONE UNDER DIRECTION OF CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE All questions relating to the interpretation of the agreement and the duties of the CONTRCTOR hereunder shall be determined by the CITY Manager or his designated representative with the right of appeal to the CITY Council if anyone affected thereby is not satisfied with the decision, or to arbitration as provided in the refuse contract. CONTRACTOR shall take steps to assure CITY that - 16 - a single individual will be assigned to act as liaison with the City of Hermosa Beach. AGREED and APPROVED this 11th day of March , 1986 BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, INC. City erk :APPROVED AS TORM: -2' i j 7-77_,,,'V /'z- City Attorney / DR Waste Systems BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES Los Angeles District January 17, 1989 The Honorable James Rosenberger Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Rosenberger: As you are aware, Section 1, term of agreement of our refuse service contract, which will expire June 30, 1989, allows for a five year extension, if mutually acceptable to both parties. Browning-Ferris Industries would like to extend the offer to negotiate extension of our contract under that option. We feel that the level of our service, and it's value to the City of Hermosa Beach are, quite frankly, the best! This has been backed up time after time with positive responses from your resi- dents and businesses to our "How are we doing?" surveys, and in other community contact programs where BFI has been involved. During the past we have moved to enhance service levels by adding new equipment to our commercial operation, renovating our residential system, implementing customer service programs, improv- ing billing systems, and implementing shared property programs. Indeed, we might be tempted to ask for an extension based solely upon our past excellent record, but past performance is only part of the overall picture. BFI continues to be on the leading edge as a provider of services to the City of Hermosa Beach, rather than resting on our past performance. To prepare for the future we have been involved over the past year in discussions with your staff concerning how to continue to apply innovative improvements to the refuse removal service we provide Hermosa Beach. Some of the areas involved are resident motor oil removal (the most prevalent household hazardous waste) recycling other home hazardous waste, and pickup and disposal of bulk items, to name a few. Ultimate test and implementation of these programs will require BFI to make some capital commitments which would require time to amortize. With an extension, we could plan on your support and that of the City Council to continue forward with these innovative programs. An additional benefit of using our services lies in the looming disposal crisis. BFI is working to enable guaranteed disposal SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247 • (213) 329-4115 10 Letter to Mayor Rosenberger Page 2 1-17-89 areas for the communities which we service. While this may seem unimportant at this point in time, it could become a significant factor within the next five years. We would be pleased to make ourselves available to the City Council to answer any questions or discuss any new directions the Council may wish to explore in solid waste disposal. Very truly yours, Ronald V. Pfeifer District Manager CC: June Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Roger Creighton, Councilman Chuck Sheldon, Councilman Etta Simpson, Councilwoman Kevin Northcraft, City Manager William Grove, Director, Building and Safety RVP:ff December 28, 1988 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 24, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, BY ADDING A SUBSECTION PERTAINING TO COST RECOVERY FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAUSED BY PERSONS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUGS RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that City Council introduce the attached ordinance for adoption. BACKGROUND: In 1987, the State of California amended Government Code Section 53150 regarding the recovery of costs resulting from incidents involving persons driving under the influence. The section reads as follows: "Any person who is under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or any drug, or the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage and any drug, who negligent operation of a motor vehicle caused by that influence proximately causes any incident resulting in an appropriate emergency response, and any person whose intentionally wrongful conduct proximately causes any incident resulting in an appropriate emergency response, is liable for the expense of an emergency response by a public 'agency to the incident." The procedure would involve billing D.U.I. drivers by invoice from the Finance Department. The driver would be billed for materials, fire/paramedic response and officers time spent investigating the accident or incident and processing the arrest. Following several news articles concerning this topic, Councilmember Williams requested that the department pursue adoption of the cost recovery procedure. (1) 12 This proposed ordinance has been delayed from introduction pending the result of a lawsuit filed against the City of San Jose wherein the suit challenged the constitutionality of the legislation and secondly challenged San Jose's broad inter- pretation and implementation of the state legislation. The suit was dismissed in November 1988 by a San Jose Superior Court upholding San Jose's position on the legislation. ANALYSIS: This ordinance will allow the city to recover costs reasonable borne for this service. Currently cities such as Long Beach, Anaheim and El Segundo utilize a similar ordinance. Steve Wisniewski Public Safety Director Kevin B. Nort craft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Jo14n J Mebiuh, Coander Operations Division Hermosa Beach Police Department Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator (2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adding thereto section 19-33.1 to Chapter 19 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, pertaining to emergency response cost recovery fees. THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 19, titled Motor Vehicles and Traffic, of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be amended by adding thereto the following subsection: Section 1. Section 19-33.1, Emergency Response Cost Recovery. Definition: "Expense of an emergency response" means those incurred by the City of Hermosa Beach in making appropriate emergency response to the incident, and shall be comprised of all costs directly arising because of the response to the particular incident, including, but not limited to the cost of providing police, fire fighting, rescue, and emergency medical services at the scene of the incident, as well as salaries of the personnel responding to the incident. Emergency Response Cost Recovery Program. Pursuant to the authority vested in the City of Hermosa Beach by state statute, each person who is under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or any drug, or the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage and any drug, whose negligent operation of a motor vehicle, boat, vessel, or aircraft caused by that influence proximately causes any incident resulting in an appropriate emergency response, or whose intentionally 1 wrongful criminal act proximately causes any incident resulting 2 in appropriate emergency response, shall pay to said city the 3 expense of such an emergency response. In no event shall a 4 person's liability under this section exceed the maximum 5 allowable under state statute, and all costs assessed pursuant 6 to this section shall reasonably relate to the actual cost of 7 the expense incurred by the city. 8 Collection of Costs. 9 The expense of an emergency response shall be charged 10 against the person liable for the expenses under this section. 11 The charge constitutes a debt of that person to the City of 12 Hermosa Beach, and is collectible by said city in the same 13 manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, 14 expressed or implied. 15 Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be 16 in full force and operation from and after thirty days after 17 its final passage and adoption. 18 Section 3. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to 19 be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general 20 circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa 21 Beach. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: CITY CLERK January 14, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 24, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE TEAMSTER, LOCAL 911, MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING ESTABLISHING A TRIAL PERIOD FOR AN ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC WORKS FIELD OPERATIONS RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Man- ager to execute the attached supplemental to the General, Super- visory, and Administrative Memoranda of Understanding with the Teamster Union, Local 911. BACKGROUND: In October 1987, the City Council authorized the execution of a supplemental to the existing Memoranda of Understanding with the Teamster Union, Local 911, which established a trial period for an alternative schedule for City Hall operations. This schedule changed the City Hall hours of operation from Monday through Fri- day, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., to Monday through Thursday 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The trial period commenced on Novemebr 30, 1987 and was originally for a six month period. By Council action, this alternative schedule was continued and is scheduled for re- consideration as part of the this meeting (January 24, 1989). When the Council extended the trial period, staff was directed to continue to explore the feasibility of an alternative schedule for the Public Works Department field personnel. The attached proposed Supplemental to the Teamster Memoranda of Understanding is a result of that direction and has been developed through ex- tensive negotiations between the Union and the Public Works Director. ANALYSIS: The proposed alternative schedule for Public Works field person- nel is a 9/80 schedule. Under this schedule, field personnel will work nine (9) hours per day Monday through Thursday and eight (8) hours on Friday (with alternating Fridays off). There are two staggered schedules to allow for the continuation of street sweeping five (5) days per week. While there were numerous alternative schedules explored, it has been determined that the proposed schedule best serves the needs of the Department. The alternative of a 4/10 schedule (7:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) was considered. It was determined that this schedule would expose the employee to work- ing during twilight hours which would adversly impact on the em- ployee's safety. Additionally, because of the labor intensive aspect of field operations, it was determined that the ten (10) hours day would potentially lead to a fatigue factor which could increase the possibility of injury. Another schedule considered would have set the working hours at 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on Friday. This schedule was rejected because, al- though there would be a.full crew on Fridays, the four hours was not sufficient for commencing any projects. It is proposed that the trialperiod for this schedule commence February 1, 1989 and run through January 31, 1990. During the trial period, the City will conduct evaluations at two month in- tervals to measure the impact of the schedule on sick leave utilization, injuries, overtime, manpower allocation, morale, etc. Should this alternative schedule prove to negatively impact on any of the measurments, the supplemental allows for the can- cellation of the trial schedule upon fourteen (14) days notice. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: fit Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 1988 BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE CALIFORNIA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL, AND MEDICAL EMPLOYEES' UNION, LOCAL 911, GENERAL SUPERVISORY, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES' BARGAINING UNITS The purpose of developing alternative scheduling is: a) to develop high morale among the employees covered by this agreement; b) to continue the'employees' positive attitude toward their work; c) to increase productivity; d) to better utilize available manpower, and d) to follow up on the current MOU. This supplemental to the Teamster Union Local 911 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been entered into pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach, hereinafter referred to as the CITY, and has been executed by the City Manager on behalf of the CITY and by the Chief Union Steward, California Teamsters Public, Professional & Medical Employees UNION, Local 911, herein after referred to as UNION. This supplemental to the Memorandum of Understanding, constitutes a mutual recommendation by the parties, to the City Council and that this agreement shall not become effective without the prior approval of the City Council. Pursuant to Council action dated October 27, 1987, a Supplemental to the current Memorandum of Understanding, it was agreed that "the CITY and the UNION will continue to explore opportunities for examining other alternate scheduling options for Public Works field personnel", (Page 3, Section 2). The CITY and UNION have conducted meetings and studied alternative work schedules. The CITY, represented by the Public Works Director, Anthony Antich; Public Works Superintendent, Vernon Highfield; Personnel Director, Robert Blackwood, and the UNION, represented by the Chief Union Steward, Michael Flaherty in concurrence with the general membership of the General, Supervisory, and Administrative Employees' Bargaining Units, mutually agree an alternative scheduling should be implemented by trial and evaluation. 1 SECTION 1. WORK SCHEDULE The CITY and the UNION mutually agree to a total of a one (1) year trial and evaluation period. Under the proposed plan Public Works field personnel employees will work a nine (9) hour day, with a 5 day and a 4 day alternating work week. This plan is referred to as the "9/80" Plan and has the same number of total hours worked per pay period and/or per year as the existing schedule. In order to implement the "9/80"•Plan, the CITY and the UNION mutually agree to the following: 1. Two (2) overlapping "9/80" schedulesare called Schedule "A" and Schedule "B". • 2. All employees covered by this supplemental shall work a .9 -hour day, Monday through Thursday; and 8 -hour day on Friday for week one, and a 9 -hour day Monday through Thursday with Friday off, for week two. Breaks shall be in conformance with department policy and the current MOU. Schedule "A" Schedule "B" Week 1 Week 2 Mon -Fri Mon-Thurs Mon-Thurs Mon -Fri 3. The existing Public Works field operations are 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The proposed field operations shall be 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on Fridays. The proposed trial period for examining the alternative schedule is to commence Wednesday, February 1, 1989 and terminate on Wednesday, January 31, 1990 unless otherwise extended by mutual agreement of both parties. SECTION 2. OVERTIME The CITY and UNION further agree that during this trial period of the "9/80" schedule: The provisions of the respective governing MOU concerning overtime are amended as follows: a) The CITY agrees to pay all employees in the General and Supervisory Bargaining Units time and one-half (1.5) times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of the regularly assigned work schedule. Employees in the Administrative Bargaining Group shall continue to receive straight time for all hours worked in excess of their regularly assigned work schedule. For purposes of defining the work period, in conformance with FLSA Rules, the work period for the "9/80" Plan starts - 2 - at 11:01 a.m. on Friday and ends at 11:00 a.m. on the following Friday. SECTION 3. HOLIDAYS The provisions of the existing MOU concerning holidays are changed to read as follows: a) All UNION members who are scheduled to work the "9/80 Plan Schedule "A" shall receive the following holidays off with pay: New Year's Day Martin Luther King Day President's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Eve Day (6 hours) Christmas Day New Year's Eve Day (5 hours) b). The "9/80 Plan Schedule "B" shall holidays off with pay: New Year's Day Martin Luther King Day President's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day receive the following Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Thanksgiving Friday Christmas Eve Day (4 hours) Christmas Day This schedule allows for the maintenance of a total of ninety (90) hours of "holiday" per year. SECTION 4. ACCRUALS The rate of sick and vacation accrual shall remain as currently specified in the appropriate MOU. The requests for time off shall be at the rate for the day requested, 9 hours or 8 hours respectively. SECTION 5. CANCELLATION CLAUSE During the "9/80" schedule, both parties further agree that either party may cancel this supplemental at any time during the trial period by giving the other party fourteen (14) calendar days written notice, without cause. SECTION 6. DUTIES OF BOTH PARTIES 1. To meet at predetermined times and dates at two (2) month intervals in order to aSSess the continuing viability of the new work schedule. Such evaluation shall include: a. Measure sick leave, IOD and absence. Patterns of sick time use or abuse (i.e., use of sick time in conjunction with regularly scheduled days off). 3 b. Measure overtime during trial period vs one year prior. c. Allocation of manpower. d. Morale. 2. That the members of the UNION affected by the trial "9/80" schedule recognize the importance and continued maintenance of adequate staffing levels for the performance of CITY operations. 4. That this new work schedule is.desirable. 5. That the leadpersons in the field operations submit written schedules for the allocation of manpower, similar, to the example on file in Public Works Department illustrating the "9/80" schedule on a 'quarterly basis. This is to be accomplished within thirty (30) calendar days from the Implementation date of the "9/80" schedule. Notwithstanding any provision of this supplemental, it is the declared intention by both parties that no UNION member shall suffer any loss of compensation, benefit, or existing entitlement, nor shall any member of the UNION profit unduly or unfairly from any failure of either party to anticipate issues of compensation, benefit, or entitlement following the approval of this supplemental. For the CITY: UNION: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Michael Flaherty Chief UNION Steward California Teamsters Union 911 DATED: DATED: Management Team: Anthony Antich Robert Blackwood Director of Public Works Director of Personnel DATED: DATED: Vernon Highfield Public Works Superintendent DATED: sup/pwadmin - 4 - January 14, 1989 Honorable Mayor and members of City Council meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 24, 1989 RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT ON THE HOURS OF OPERATION FOR CITY HALL, ALTERNATIVE 4/10 SCHEDULE RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the continua- tion of the 4/10 alternative schedule for City Hall operations. BACKROUND: In July 1987, the City Council was advised of the intent to ex- plore alternative hours of operation for City Hall offices. This alternative schedule had been requested by the employees repre- sented by the Teamsters Public, Professional, and Medical Em- ployees' Union, Local 911. At the October 13, 1987 meeting, the Council was advised of the results of a survey of city service users. That survey concluded that 70% of those citizens responding indicated that they would prefer to have City Hall open for extended hours and that Friday was the least likely day of the week that the largest percentage of respondents would visit City Hall. On October 27, 1987, the City Council approved changing the hours of operation for City Hall to 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday thru Thursday for a six month trial period commencing November 30, 1987. The alternative schedule was continued by Council action through December 1989 and is now due for evaluation. In addition to employees working in City Hall offices, alterna- tive schedules are in place in the Police Department and General Services field operations. A proposed alternative schedule for Public works field operations is included as part of the agenda for the January 24th meeting. ANALYSIS: In order to evaluate the impacts of the 4/10 alternative schedule, the following was accomplished: 1. Analysis of sick leave utilization. 2. Analysis of overtime utilization. 3. Survey of City Hall service users (Citizen survey) - 1 - 4. Survey of Department Directors 5. Survey of employees. Sick/Overtime Utilization: Utilization of sick leave and overtime during the 4/10 schedule was compared to the same time period the previous year when the City was on a 5/8 schedule (Monday through Friday, 8-5). The attached tables (exhibits A & B) indicate the percentage change in the utilization of "sick time" used, "admin. time" earned, and "comp. time" earned for the comparision periods. Compared to the time period one year. previous,'sick leave was reduced by 5% (approx. savings = $960.00). Overtime was also reduced by 5% (approx. savings = $409.06). The one measurment which increased was "Administrative Time". This is time earned by FLSA exempt employees on an hour for hour basis for all hours worked in excess of their normal schedule. The increase of 1% indicates an increase cost of approx. $466.00. The net savings to the City for the trial period of the 4/10 schedule is approximately $903.06. Employee Survey: A survey was distributed to all employees assigned to City Hall offices. The results of the employee survey are attached (exhibit C). t This survey was intended to measure the employees' perception of the impact of the alternative schedule on such factors as: > their department's ability to serve citizens > their impression of the citizen's opinions toward the alternative schedule > how the employee feels about working the alternative schedule. This survey indicates that 96% of the employees who responded to the survey are in favor of continuing the 4/10 schedule (please refer to exhibit "C" for actual questions/responses. Department Head Survey: Each of the Department heads were surveyed to acertain their per- ception of the impact of the 4/10 schedule on their operations. The results of this survey are attached as Exhibit "D". Although 20% of the Department Heads indicated that they had experienced some scheduling problems (e.g. Friday meeting, lunch breaks, deadlines), 100% recommended continuation of the 4/10 schedule. Citizen Survey: During the month of December 1988, a survey was conducted of those persons using City Hall services (including the General Services operations located at 1035 Valley Dr.). Each depart- ment was directed to request each citizen seeking servcie at the public counters to complete a survey. The copy of that survey, as well as the results, is attached as exhibit "E". Respondents to the survey were broken into two catagories, Hermosa Beach residents and non-residents. The results of that survey follow. Of those responding: 1. 95% of residents found the current hours convenient. 89% of non-residents found current hours convenient. 2. 8870 of residents indicated a desire to have current hours continued. 80% or non-residents indicated a desire to have current hours continued. 3. 83% of residents indicated no inconvenience with City Hall closed on Friday. 74% or non-residents indicated no inconvience with City Hall closed on Friday. 4. 83% of residents indicated a preference not to change City Hall hours back to Monday -Friday. 65% of non-residents indicated a preference not to change City hall hours back to Monday -Friday. ANALYSIS: In addition to the positive results of the above evaluation which measured cost to the City, employee perceptions/morale, and citizen input, there are other factors which are improved by this alternative schdule. These factors include: 1. City Hall offices are open an additional 4 week (previously closed from 12:00 noon to 2. Ability to serve citizens before and after regular work hours as well as during their period. hours each 1:00 p.m.) their lunch 3. Reduction by 20% the number of vehicle trips for commuting to and from work. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) will re- quire, under Regulation XV, agencies to submit and implement a trip reduction plan by January 1, 1990 which encourages employees to reduce their driving to from work. If this alternative schedule continues to be beneficial to the City and its em- ployees, it will assist the City in meeting this requirement. 3 ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives to the 4/10 schedule which could be considered are: 1. City Hall open nine (9) hours Monday through Thursday and four (4) hours on Friday. Pro: Con: - Addresses concern with incoming mail/inquires. - Allows access to City Hall on Friday. - City Hall open extended hours Monday -Thursday. - Addresses concerns with scheduled Friday meetings. - No reduction of vehcile trips. - Eliminates citizens ability to conduct business either before or after their working hours (depending on whether offices open at 7 or 8). - Eliminates benefit to employee. 2. .City Hall open nine (9) hours Monday through Thursday, eight (8) hours Friday, with alternate Fridays off (9/80 schedule). Pro: Con: - City Hall open extended hours Monday -Thursday - Partially addresses concerns with scheduled Friday meetings/inquires/mail. - Confusing to citizens when City Hall open/closed. - Reduces number of vehicle trips saved. - Reduces benefit to employee. - Eliminates citizens ability to conduct business either before or after their working hours (depending on whether offices open at 7 or 8). 3. Staggered 4/10 schedules. City Hall open Monday -Friday 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Some employees off Monday, others off Friday. Pro: Con: - City Hall open extended hours Monday through Friday. - Maintains benefit to employee. - Maintains reduction in vehicle trips. - Addresses concern with scheduled Friday meetings/ inquires/mail. - Inadequate staffing on Monday and Friday - Dificultly scheduling meetings/assignments. - Decreased ability to staff during vacation/sick leave. 4. Return to previous schedule, Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Pro: - City Hall open on Fridays. - Addresses concern with scheduled meeting/inquires/ mail. Con: - Eliminates extended hours. - Eliminates benefit to employee. - Contrary to results of Citizen survey/Department 4 Head survey/Employee survey. - Eliminates reduction in vehicle trips. Prior to the implementation of any alternative to the current 4/ 10 schedule, the City would be required to meet and confer with the impacted employee organizations. A return to the previous schedule requires a minimum of fourteen (14) days notice be given. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director B Kevin B. Nor1hcraft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The current 4/10 plan clearly has advantages and disadvantages. Some citizens are convenienced and some are inconvenienced. The productivity advantages are partially offset by the scheduling difficulties of dealing in a business world operating on a different work schedule. There are, however, two unarguable gains to the current work schedule - employee acceptance and trip generation reduction. The overwhelming employee acceptance of the plan documents there is a benefit helpful in recruitment and retention. This is doubly important for our City since we are not yet able to pay fully competitive salaries. The 20% reduction in trips aids in reducing traffic congestion, pollution emissions, and parking problems. It is an important, governmental example of what can be done to reduce these significant urban problems. I support continuation of the current schedule on a continuing basis (the "trial" aspect hinders our ability to use in recruitments). 5 DEPT. SICK LEAVE USAGE SICK LEAVE USAGE 4/10 SCH. 5/8 SCH. Administration Building/Bus. Lic. Finance General Services Planning Public Works TOTALS 20.80 447.40 • 294.00 474.00 33.75 146.50 1,416.45 201.63 422.25 195.12 410.50 42.25 215.33 1,487.08 PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN SICK LEAVE USAGE The following figures indicate the percentage change in SICK LEAVE USAGE incurred during the start of the 4/10 work period in relation to the same time one year ago. SICK LEAVE USAGE IN RELATION TO 1 YEAR AGO -5% DEPT. OVERTIME ACCRUAL COMP. TIME EARNED I ADMIN. EARNED 4/10 SCH. 5/8 SCH. I 4/10 SCH. 5/8 SCH. Administration 30.00 Building/Bus. Lic. 126.50 Finance 249.50 general Services 99.75 Planning 45.75 Public Works 74.00 TOTALS 625.50 33.50 5.0.2 5 134.04 277.75 6.30 153.76 655.60 516.95 207.25 140.67 313.55 229.03 436.50 1,843.95 671.33 194.50 60.47 308.80 199.00 386.53 1,820.63 NOTE: "COMP" is time accrued beyond an employee's normal working hours and is computed at time and one-half. "Admin" is time accrued beyond an employee's normal working hours and is computed on an hour -for -hour basis. PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN ACCRUAL The following figures indicate the percentage change in comp. and admin. time earned during the 4/10 work period in relation to the same time period one year ago. OVERTIME USAGE IN RELATION TO 1 YEAR AGO COMP. ADMIN. -5'/0 +1% CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESULTS OF EMPLOYEE SURVEY (sample size = 26) In order to evaluate the impact of the 4/10 schedule, we would like for you to complete the following survey. PART I In this section, there are several statements about the 4/10 work schedule 1•isted below. We would like to see if you agree or disagree with these statements. There are four choices from which you may choose your answer. Please place a check mark in the one• box which most accurately reflects your opinion. STRONGLY DON'T STRONGLY AGREE AGREE KNOW DISAGREE . DISAGREE 1) The 4/10 work schedule is a "good idea" for our department 69% 2370 8% 2) Citizens have been satisfied with the 4/10 operating hours of our department 5470 27% 197 3) Working a ten-hour day has increased our de- partment's respon- siveness to citizens' needs 5870 38% 470 4) Working four days a week has improved our department's ability to serve citizens 5070 4270 4% 470 5) The 4/10 work schedule has improved our depart- ment's efficiency 5070 2770 1970 4% 6) The 4/10 work schedule has helped to decrease job related stress 50% 3170 19% a PART II In this section, we are interested in: your opinions concerning departmental staffing arrangements; your perception of citizens' attitudes toward the 4/10 schedule; and your assesment of employees' morale since the start of the trail period. In all of the questions, there are several possible responses. Please place a check mark in the one box which most closely fits your personal evaluation. 7) Has the 4/10 work shift created any scheduling problems in your department? 92% NO 8% YES > 7a.• Please specify the types of problems you have encountered (if you require additional space for comments, you should refer to Part III) 8) Have your received any comments from the public regarding the new operating hours of City Hall? 23% NO 73% YES > 8a. In general, what "types" of comments have you received from citizens? [ ] POSITIVE [ ] NEGATIVE 2 9) In terms of the current work schedule, what is your opinion of the City's ability to serve citizens' needs and demands? t 69% EXCELLENT 23% GOOD 8% FAIR 0% POOR 0% DON'T KNOW 10) How would you rate employees' morale in your department since the start of the 4/10 work schedule? 8870 IMPROVED 12% NO CHANGE 0% DECLINED 11) In general, how satisfied are you with the current work schedule? 92% VERY SATISFIED 470 SOMEWHAT SATISFIED 4% SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED 0% VERY DISSATISFIED 0% DON'T KNOW 12) In your opinion, would you recommend the continuation of*the 4/10 work schedule? 4% NO 96% YES 3 PART III The empty box below can used for you to write any additional comments you may have regarding the 4/10 work schedule. Please print your comments and feel fret to continue to write your comments on the back of this page if there isn't enough room in the box. 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESULTS OF DEPARTMENT HEAD SURVEY* In order to•evaluate the impact of the 4/10 schedule, we would like for you to complete the following survey. PART I In this section, there are several statements about the 4/10 work schedule listed below. We would like to see if you agree or disagree with these statements. There are four choices from which you may•choose your answer. Please place a check mark in the one box which most accurately reflects your opinion. 1) The 4/10 work schedule is a "good idea" for our department 2) Citizens have been satisfied with the 4/10 operating hours of our department STRONGLY DON'T STRONGLY AGREE AGREE KNOW DISAGREE DISAGREE 3 3 6 1 4 3 3) Working a ten-hour day has increased our de- partment's respon- siveness to citizens' needs 2 3 3 2 4 Working four days a week has improved our department's ability to serve citizens 2 2 3 2 5) The 4/10 work schedule has improved our depart- ment's efficiency 1 3 4 2 6) The 4/10 work schedule has helped to decrease job related stress 1 PART II In this section, we are interested in: your opinions concerning departmental staffing arrangements; your perception of citizens' attitudes toward the 4/10 schedule; and your assesment of employees' morale since the start of the trail period. In all of the questions, there are several possible responses. Please place a check mark in the one box which most closely fits your personal evaluation. 7) Has the 4/10 work shift created any scheduling problems in your department? 8 NO 2 YES > 7a. Please specify the types of problems you have encountered (if you require additional space for comments, you should refer to Part III) Friday Meetings Mail/Inquires Lunch Break Scheduling Deadlines Noticing 8) Have your received any comments from the public regarding the new operating hours of City Hall? 6 NO 4 YES > 8a. In general, what "types" of comments have you received from citizens? ( ] POSITIVE (many) ( ] NEGATIVE (few) 9) In terms of the current work schedule, what is your opinion of the City's ability to serve citizens' needs and demands? 2 EXCELLENT 8 GOOD FAIR POOR DON'T KNOW 10) How would you rate employees' morale in your department since the start of the 4/10 work schedule? 8 IMPROVED 2 NO .CHANGE DECLINED 11) In general, how satisfied are you with the current work schedule? 5 VERY SATISFIED 4 SOMEWHAT SATISFIED 1 SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED VERY DISSATISFIED DON'T KNOW 12) In your opinion, would you recommend the continuation of the 4/10 work schedule? NO 10 YES (Note: One indicated "with changes") PART III The empty box below can used for you to write any additional comments you may have regarding the 4/10 work schedule. Please print your comments and feel free to continue to write your comments on the back of this page if there isn't enough room in the box. Summary of typical comments: 1. (neg) Impact of attending afterschool programs 2. (neg) Mail service on Friday 3. (pos) Many comments from public re; ability to conduct business without taking time off from work 4. (neg) Some citizens didn't know City Hall closed on Friday. 5. (pos) Morale increased in Depoartment 6. (pos) No negative comments from public. 7. (neg) Some scheduling problems because of deadlines. 8. (pos) Schedule benefit to both public and employees. 9. (pos) Initailly concerned with public acceptance, seems to have been accepted well and certainly the employees like it. CITIZEN SURVEY: FINAL RESULTS QUESTION #1 Is the current City Hall work schedule convenient for you? (Mon. thru.Thurs., 7 a.m. TO 6 p.m.) RESIDENTS N=59 • NON -RES. N=46 YES 9570 897 NO, NO OPIN. 070 470 270 470 NO RESPONSE 370 270 QUESTION #2 Do you want the current City Hall work schedule continued (Mon. thru Thurs. 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.)? RESIDENTS N=59 NON -RES. N=46 YES 88% 80% NO 570 1570 NO OPIN. 5'/0 470 NO RESPONSE 270 070 CITIZEN SURVEY: FINAL RESULTS QUESTION #3 Has it been inconvenient for you to have City Hall closed on Fridays? RESIDENTS N=59 NON -RES. N=46 YES 157 2270 NO 83i 74% NO OPIN. 270 470 NO RESPONSE 070 070 a QUESTION #4 Do you want City Hall to return to the previous hours of operation (Mon. thru Fri. 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.)? RESIDENTS N=59 NON -RES. N=46 YES NO 370 22% 83% 65% NO OPIN. NO RESPONSE 14% 1370 070 070 -r January 15, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 24, 1989 RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ATTENDANCE AT LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES EMPLOYEE RELATIONS INSTITUTE RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council consider attendance at the annual League of California Cities; Employee Relations In- stitute on February 22-23, 1989. BACKGROUND: The attached announcment describes the program for the 1989 Em- ployee Relations Institute sponsered by the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors Association. This conference is designed to provide an educational opportunity for local elected officials on issues confronting municipalities in the area of labor relations. This City Council has expressed a strong interest in the labor negotiation process and has just recently completed contract negotiations with employees represented by the Teamster Union, Local 911, the Police Officer's Associaion, and the Management Association. Negotiations upcoming in this year include the Firefighter's As- sociation and Management Association. In addition to labor negotiations processes, this conference covers• such other areas as: * The Changing Workforce and What it Means to Local Government * Legislative Mandates for Elected Officials * Affirmative Action Policies The registration deadline for this conference is February 10, 1989 (February 1, 1989 for reservations). Respectfully submitted, (1446;04a,csA,-ta Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: Kevin B. Nor hcraft City Manager ��a J MUM MEW OEMS o■ -r California Cities Work Together League of California Cities 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • (916) 444-5790 Sacramento, CA December 21, 1988 TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Managers, City Attorneys, Personnel Directors, and Employee Relations Officers ANNOUNCING THE 23rd ANNUAL EMPLOYEE RELATIONS INSTITUTE Wednesday - Thursday February 22 - 23, 1989 Fairmont Hotel San Jose 170 South Market Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408/998-1900 Public sector employee relations not only takes as much as 80% of your operating budget, it also covers an ever widening array of issues affecting local government policies and administration. Every time Congress and the Legislature meet, counties and cities are subjected to an increasing number of mandates requiring additional employees, employee benefits and policies that should be authorized or negotiated rather than mandated. The courts also contribute to burdens imposed on local policy makers and administrators and each year this burden becomes heavier because of reduced revenues and because priorities often are established by higher levels of government. ' There are many examples of these new policies and programs, such as the extension of unemployment insurance benefits and the federal minimum wage and premium pay laws to public employees, mandatory Medicare, repeal of authority to withdraw from Social Security, a never-ending list of items now considered to be discriminatory practices, continuation of health benefits for terminated or separated employees and, most recently, the duty to re-examine all health, accident and insurance policies to determine whether they may discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees. It is more difficult for management to manage than ever before. These and many other topics will be discussed at the Employee Relations Institute by experts, with the emphasis being on the role of the elected members of local governing bodies. A review of the attached preliminary program quickly discloses the topics which will be considered in this two-day Institute. The League will be joined by the County Supervisors Association of California in sponsoring the Institute, thus giving you the opportunity to discuss employee relations issues with both city and county officials. This informal professional exchange augments the valuable sessions offered on the program, and makes the Institute an essential source of the latest information you'll need as you prepare for the 1989 bargaining session. Please note the following deadlines: Hotel Reservations: Wednesday, February 1, 1989 Advance Conference Registration: Friday, February 10, 1989 eriann89.train REGISTRATION. You are encouraged to register in advance using the registration form attached. Complete the Advance Registration Form and return it with a check or money order (please no purchase orders) in the appropriate amount to the LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CONFERENCE REGISTRATION OFFICE, P.O. BOX 7005, LAFAYETTE, CA 94549, (415-283-2113). TO PROCESS THE REGISTRATION, PAYMENT OF THE REGISTRATION FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM. At the bottom of the Registration Form is a questionnaire for those who plan to attend the meeting but do not wish to register in advance. If you expect to attend, please fill out either the ADVANCE REGISTRATION SECTION (return with payment) or the ATTENDANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION, and return the entire form to the League's Conference Registration Office by Friday, February 10, 1989. On-site registration facilities for those not registering in advance will open on Wednesday, February 23, at 8:00 a.m. REGISTRATION FEE. The fee structure for League conferences provides for a reduced fee for advance registration. To take advantage of the 'reduced fees, the registration must be postmarked not later than Friday, February 10, 1989. After that date the full fee will apply. If your registration is not sent by February 10, please register on site. The registration fee for this conference includes program materials, three programmed meal functions, a reception and breaks. ADVANCE REGISTRATION FEE BEFORE FEB 10 ON SITE PUBLIC OFFICIALS $125 150 NON PUBLIC OFFICIALS $140 $165 REGISTRATION FEE REFUND POLICY. Advance registrants unable to attend this meeting will receive a refund of the full registration fee, less a $35 processing charge, by submitting a written request to the LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CONFERENCE REGISTRATION OFFICE, BOX 7005, LAFAYETTE, CA 94549. REQUEST FOR REFUNDS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MONDAY, MARCH 27, 1989. HOTEL RESERVATIONS. The Fairmont Hotel will hold a block of sleeping rooms for this meeting until Wednesday, February 1, 1989. After that date, reservations will be on a space -available basis. When making your hotel reservations, please use the attached HOTEL RESERVATION FORM which includes the sleeping room rate of $98 single, double or twin -bedded room; plus 8% city hotel tax. Non-smoking rooms are available upon request. If you are planning to share a room, only one form with both names is necessary. Reservations must be received by Wednesday, February 1, 1989, to ensure that your room request is filled. A deposit in the amount of $100 is required to confirm individual reservations or guarantee with major credit card (American Express, Mastercard, Visa, Diners Club, Carte Blanche). Deposits are refundable if your reservation is canceled by 6:00 p.m. day of arrival; be sure to record your cancellation number. Check-in time is 3 pm; check-out 1 pm -- luggage can be stored at Bell Desk. Hotel reservation forms should be returned directly to: Reservations Department, Fairmont Hotel, 170 South Market Street, San Jose, CA 95113. LOCATION. By Auto: The Fairmont Hotel is located in downtown San Jose at the intersection of Market Street and Paseo de San Antonio, facing Plaza Park, 3 blocks south of Santa Clara Street. Hotel guest parking by valet is $4.50 per day. The visitors rate is 2.00/hour, with a $9.50 maximum per day. By Air: The Fairmont is 3 miles, or 10 minutes, from San Jose International Airport. Complimentary shuttle van service every half hour. Wait for white Fairmont van in front of Baggage Claim area. Taxi is approximately $9 from airport. The Fairmont is 30 miles from San Francisco International Airport; 38 miles from Oakland International Airport. TRANSPORTATION. Travel information (air and auto rental), reservations and ticket service are available through Mutual Benefit Travel Association, the League's travel consultant in Sacramento, at 916-929-4488 or 800-223-6282. Discount air fares are available on American and USAir for League meetings. Contact MBTA for ticketing arrangements. Discount fares are subject to availability; be sure to make your reservations early. SPOUSES. No spouse program is planned; however, spouses are most welcome to attend any of the sessions, receptions and meal functions. Tickets for meals for spouses or guests can be purchased at the League Registration Desk, on a space -available basis. Information on local attractions also will be available. •r• Y) Jamo r �%■®11r 3111111E California Cities Work Together League of California Cities 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • (916) 444-5790 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS INSTITUTE February 22 - 23, 1989 Fairmont Hotel San Jose PRELIMINARY PROGRAM Wednesday, February 22 8:30 am Concurrent Pre -Institute Workshops I. Basics of Labor Negotiations for Elected Officials II. Advanced Negotiation Techniques III. Promotional & Pre -Employment Testing: Inside v. Outside 10:00 am Opening General Session Major Issues for the 1990's 12:00 noon General Luncheon The Changing Workforce and What it Means to Local Government 1:45 pm Concurrent Sessions I. Role of the Elected Official in the Labor Relations Process II. Controlling the New Health Care Inflation III. Section 89 (Part I): Overview, Eligibility & Qualifications Tests 3:30 pm Concurrent Sessions I. Preparation for Strikes and Job Actions II. Health & Human Productivity: Preventing Problems III. Section 89 (Part II): Implementation & Administration 5:30 pm Hosted Get -Acquainted Reception Thursday, February 23 7:30 am Continental Breakfast Table Topics Informal Discussions Grievance Procedures Public Service Skills Computers in Negotiations Workers' Compensation Funding Retiree Health Programs Executive Search PERS Office Ergonomics &.Sick Building Syndrome 9:00 am Concurrent Sessions 10:30 am I. Binding Interest Arbitration and Other Legislative Mandates for Elected Officials II. Workers' Compensation: CSAC & League Projects III. Family & the Workplace: Child & Parental Care Concurrent Sessions I. Defending Employer Affirmative Action Policies for Elected Officials II. At -Will Employment & Termination III. Training & Human Resources Development as a Management Strategy 12:00 noon General Luncheon Women in Employment & Related Legislative Issues 1:30 pm Concurrent Sessions I. Flexible Benefits --Including Section 89 Requirements II. Litigation Update 3:00 pm Adjourn eriann89.train SCALE: I = 30' PARCEL MAP N0.19555 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , COUNTY OF LOS STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 20 'PAGEBLOCK 84 ", TRACT OF MAPS, IN O. PER MAP RECORDED IN BOO OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ANGELES 1677, AS THE OFFICE _sz/z /1///:ESS 5 7-,9 /17 2v7 • . >//f/T / 1/ >yE s//8l////./=2 . 4/vs w/7-77//ti rye �ir/isio�l/ s//aG,/t/ air/ 7-i/7/ZSwiry//t/ Tye z//v---s- 2 ,-74/z77ti��l/T %0 7 / 4, T/��/ -9A // /G /t/q / 414/ 7 SG./z5 /1//S/tic/ s� fl�i�DM� - OG AZA SC/B.///, i' GoU/t/7"Y o Gas �9/t/Cj�G�s j SS_ ort/ >.//s /¢ �aGToB�r 2 /985, ,•-z,/.25-z./.. //t/ ,,-9iU7. o .q ,//�S/> ,�E�So/t/�9GG Y , voGV/t/ 70, & r 727 Nle 0/!/ 774' 895/5 �� S�9r/S�fC72 J OTo r � G✓i7`,y//t/ z1/ --14-7--/S' � Ute-SGS/S�.1/ TO /GGS A/ 27 nFF'CIpt SEW TONY MILLS N'A {( Y i" JUl tr ALdMRNI { `Y _. 1�,, • I l}l}111)? rt. G")/7-/-'-Tf��s 'A 4 - 5 c��r-i�ic�rE_ z_/%/.4:7 /c7io/t/ G- A// 7 ---/V �/�l ��/I//_�/mit/ d•� �/1/Y ��i "r'7 r//v J /f///' f�9/O /it/ /// . G/7: - cG ��rs G•E�Ti�i��>� . G/TY Go�//t/G/G Ori rf/� G/7 -- /1-77-7,/l/ �99�o,�r�� T / >s 2/t/ G/7 7 cGE��' o� 72V LOMA D p� /v/.0°7() LLI /1//"/D Gv �L►/.4 SUNSET vo DRIVE N 3DB 3d 6 Q, a 3D L.0 a" ,57 •57 7-2 - G%2//iGT/Oif/ /,4/ /7-ff/z". yG� X91% 7 9/t" OG 9U//1/ /tet/ - /-r >-0-9 f'� G'./V/77/7-7471/29G-G- A-729 '. /V/ /7-7or1/29GG ,/i1/2 2 vG. E. ZOO 7 '7;9 z /7-: • fcr- 1�7 T>9/S —�0/-1 7----A7-9GT /t/i, /t7 za - /8¢ ,Z////v AU,/'ir/VA M/r7/ / ir14 1 , .4G,9G//O/P�W4 CJ,�rI'/ i�i9G / 7X/S !i✓/ T.A. TIDEMANSON /Z/Z.3/.88 ,�3f� .. CITY ENGINEER �0 .O,C' ii/,q/L , /!,/o A's-, ACCEl7 2 ,44 • /No/GA7 77V 00C/4/741 Y a.- 7-gb- G ANP' .f'E�/A/ S�/B.P/V// ' BP. T///5 /SAO DR/VE ti a 1---, F� �X /t/�/z , /w �,�F /A./TEiP�ECT/0/(/ 1 ,v t ,!�✓ DEPUTY sC/z5"s7�/r/7-/,GG !� To 7--6/- -477 - ; -/1/7- 97 ' ' / 7 8 988 C�gz2 Co/t/. / j/tet//G//2-7 /VG' - Ni//f//Ural P-27/1:' 2 U/t//T,s , G✓/t/e'F�,S l 'V/7 ate" X4/4 M//z-Z-- i/.2.27 /tet/ M/i//Gf/ !�✓/GG /tet/ TC//ePit/, v/r7 .G 1A/G7 //7-7-G/77- 77/7/- /7 / 77 -��/��/1 "7 - �� 77* L/A//7 . �Y�PA�E�v�/�� ! //issr/ccEysolP ,.�,a�� 4/ 8 0� v/vEG/iv�5' �I s ��-.� r��EI� /G/7-) / '4 -07 e%> -`---- >1/1%" >>9/o /s //A2'7r /it/ /1/7--z//r- T