HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/13/994 ,e.,,..) A*79 6di6N,,x
4k2471-
Ci.A1U.1)46--
"We often love things and use people when we should use things and love people."
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, July 13, 1999 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Regular Session - 7:10 p.m.
MAYOR
Julie Oakes
MAYOR PRO TEM
J. R. Reviczky
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Robert Benz
John Bowler
Sam Y. Edgerton
r
CITY CLERK
Elaine Doerfling
CITY TREASURER
John M. Workman
CITY MANAGER
Stephen R. Burrell
CITY ATTORNEY
Michael Jenkins
All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly
every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the
Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the
Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council
foyer.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MAYOR'S COMMENTS / ANNOUNCEMENTS
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the
Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on
the posted agenda.
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the
Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing
items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to
1
• •
request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please
limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak:
1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar;
2) during Public Hearings;
3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under
Municipal Matters; and,
4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments".
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are
requested to submit those comments to the City Manager.
(b) COUNCIL COMMENTS
(c)
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1) Letter from Gary Brutsch regarding numerous issues facing Hermosa
taxpayers that he would like addressed by any candidates for City Council
in public debate.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
2) Letter from Jim Lissner regarding expansion of liquor businesses on Pier
Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
3) Letter from Charlotte Malone, Vice -President of the Hermosa Beach
Friends of the Library, requesting that the City Council contact Los
Angeles County Supervisor Don Knabe, as well as the L. A. County
Librarian, to request an increase in library hours and improvements.
RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's
signature.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted
upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an
item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda
Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time.
(a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes:
1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 8, 1999; and
2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 22, 1999
2
(b) Recommendation to ratify check register.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to accept and appropriate the following donations given to
the Community Resources Department for the following purposes:
1999 Sunset Concerts on the Beach
Hawthorne Savings - $10,000.00
Anheuser Busch - $5,000.00
Skateboard Track Grand Opening Ceremonies
E.T. Surfboards - $300.00
Globe Shoes, LLC - $150.00
Surf Like A Girl - $100.00
Vanguard Surf Culture - $75.00
Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 1, 1999
(e) Recommendation to, adoptresolution.authorizing the South Bay Private
Industry Council to act as the Local Workforce Investment Board.
Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 6, 1999.
(1) Recommendation to accept the work by Asan Construction Company for
CIP Project No. 97-525, Community Center Skate Track, and authorize final
payment to the contractor. Memorandum from Public Works Director
Harold Williams dated June 29, 1999.
(g)
Recommendation to extend the current contract for City advertising (legal
and display ads) with the Easy Reader newspaper and approve the contract
for a term of three years. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated
July 7, 1999.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
NONE
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar.
3
• •
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
4. PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182 MYRTLE AVENUE, UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 - PROTEST
HEARING AND TABULATION OF THE BALLOTS. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 6, 1999.
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct hearing; 2) adoptresolutioWmaking
determinations, confirming assessments and proceedings, and ordering the
acquisition of the improvements, designating the City Treasurer to collect and
receive assessments and to establish a special fund for Assessment District No. 97-
1; and, 3) adopt'resolution'awarding Project No. CIP 97-182 Myrtle Avenue
Utility Undergrounding Assessment District Improvement to Irish Construction of
Rosemead, California.
5. PROJECT NO. CIP 97-183 LOMA DRIVE, UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 - PROTEST
HEARING AND TABULATION OF THE BALLOTS. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 6, 1999.
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct hearing; 2) adoptresolutionmaking
determinations, confirming assessments and proceedings, and ordering the
acquisition of the improvements, designating the City Treasurer to collect and
receive assessments and to establish a special fund for Assessment District No. 97-
2; and, 3) adopt resolution',awarding Project No. CIP 97-183 Loma Drive Utility
Undergrounding Assessment District Improvement to Irish Construction of
Rosemead, California.
6. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, WITH
CONDITIONS, OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND
PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING
RESTAURANT, FAT FACE FENNER'S FISHACK, WITH ON -SALE
ALCOHOL AT 53 PIER AVENUE. Memorandum from Community
Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 4, 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION_ That the City Council
approve Conditional Use Permit Amendment No. 99-4 and Parking Plan No. 99-2
subject to the Conditions of Approval in the attached resolution
4
• •
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. MILLENNIUM WALKWAY LOCATION. Memorandum from Community
Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 15, 1999.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the sidewalk on 14th Street at the Strand as
the location for the Millenium Walkway.
8. INITIATIVE PETITION TO REPEAL CERTAIN MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTIONS TO ELIMINATE HERMOSA BEACH UTILITY USER TAX.
Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 7, 1999.
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive and file report ordered pursuant to
Elections Code Section 9212 analyzing the fiscal impact of the proposed
ordinance; and, 2) Select one of the following alternatives: (a) Introduce the
ordinance without alteration (then adopt it within 10 days) or; (b) Direct the City
Clerk to prepare the documents required to submit the ordinance, without
alteration, to the voters at the next regular municipal election occurring
November 2, 1999.
9. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE MEASURES FOR THE NOVEMBER 2, 1999
BALLOT.
a. Measure submitted by Councilmember Benz requiring all zoning changes
be submitted to the voters for approval.
b. Measure submitted by Councilmember Benz changing the height limit to
45 feet in commercial zones.
c. Other possible measures of interest to the City Council.
10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
NONE
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO FILL TWO
EXPIRED TERMS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling
dated July 8, 1999.
RECOMMENDATION: Appoint/reappoint from among the applicants
interviewed earlier this evening to fill the two expired terms on the
Planning Commission.
5
• •
b. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. Memorandum
from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 1, 1999.
RECOMMENDATION: Appoint delegates and alternates to the various
committees, consistent with the policy of maintaining permanent
representation whenever possible, and delete any obsolete temporary
subcommittees as appropriate.
12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items:
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer
to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
a. Request by Councilmember Bowler to consider designating lower Pier
Avenue as a "Pedestrian Plaza".
b. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct staff to modify bench
seating at South Park Roller Hockey Rink so that small children can view
the action while seated.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction
may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
6
ACTION SHEET
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL.
Tuesday, July 13, 1999 - 7:10 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MAYOR'S COMMENTS / ANNOUNCEMENTS
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(b) COUNCIL COMMENTS
(c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1) Letter from Gary Brutsch regarding numerous issues facing Hermosa
taxpayers that he would like addressed by any candidates for City Council
in public debate.
2) Letter from Jim Lissner regarding expansion of liquor businesses on Pier
Avenue.
3) Letter from Charlotte Malone, Vice -President of the Hermosa Beach
Friends of the Library, requesting that the City Council contact Los
Angeles County Supervisor Don Knabe, as well as the L. A. County
Librarian, to request an increase in library hours and improvements.
• •
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
(a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes:
1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 8, 1999; and
2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 22, 1999
(b) Recommendation to ratify check register.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to accept and appropriate the following donations given to
the Community Resources Department for the following purposes:
1999 Sunset Concerts on the Beach
Hawthorne Savings - $10,000.00
Anheuser Busch - $5,000.00
Skateboard Track Grand Opening Ceremonies
E.T. Surfboards - $300.00
Globe Shoes, LLC - $150.00
Surf Like A Girl - $100.00
Vanguard Surf Culture - $75.00
Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 1, 1999
(e) Recommendation to adopt resolution authorizing the South Bay Private
Industry Council to act as the Local Workforce Investment Board.
Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 6, 1999.
i
ACT'LO
PROVE STAFFCO1 NI E DATI1
i
(f) Recommendation to accept the work by Asan Construction Company for
CIP Project No. 97-525, Community Center Skate Track, and authorize final
payment to the contractor. Memorandum from Public Works Director
Harold Williams dated June 29, 1999.
(g)
Recommendation to extend the current contract for City advertising (legal
and display ads) with the Easy Reader newspaper and approve the contract
for a term of three years. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated
July 7, 1999.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
NONE
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
4. PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182 MYRTLE AVENUE, UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1- PROTEST
HEARING AND TABULATION OF THE BALLOTS. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 6, 1999.
5. PROJECT NO. CIP 97-183 LOMA DRIVE, UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 - PROTEST
HEARING AND TABULATION OF THE BALLOTS. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 6, 1999.
6. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, WITH
CONDITIONS, OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND
PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING
RESTAURANT, FAT FACE FENNER'S FISHACK, WITH ON -SALE
ALCOHOL AT 53 PIER AVENUE. Memorandum from Community
Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 4, 1999.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. MILLENNIUM WALKWAY LOCATION. Memorandum from Community
Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 15, 1999.
ACTION
PRO VE THESIDEWALI
'HE LOCATION FOR THE.MILLENI
......................................................................................................:
8. INITIATIVE PETITION TO REPEAL CERTAIN MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTIONS TO ELIMINATE HERMOSA BEACH UTILITY USER TAX.
Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 7, 1999.
9. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE MEASURES FOR THE NOVEMBER 2, 1999
BALLOT.
a. Measure submitted by Councilmember Benz requiring all zoning changes
be submitted to the voters for approval.
b. Measure submitted by Councilmember Benz changing the height limit to
45 feet in commercial zones.
c. Other possible measures of interest to the City Council.
10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
NONE
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO FILL TWO
EXPIRED TERMS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling
dated July 8, 1999.
b. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. Memorandum
from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 1, 1999.
12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
a. Request by Councilmember Bowler to consider designating lower Pier
Avenue as a "Pedestrian Plaza".
1
CION: CONTINUE ITEM TO MEETINI
1
b. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct staff to modify bench
seating at South Park Roller Hockey Rink so that small children can view
the action while seated.
1
`11ON ` CONTINUE ITEM TO MEETING:0
1
CITIZEN COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
I
Mayor and City Council
JULRee/P --
- 6 1999
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Voters look forward to the election cycle for various reasons. I personally am looking
forward to some thoughtful debate dealing with the numerous issues facing Hermosa
taxpayers. The following are thoughts on several topics I feel should be included during
the candidate's public debate.
Regional recreational centers are expensive. Local taxpayers pay for city services via our
tax dollars. Has the regional skate board park created a public nuisance and as a self-
insured City are we financially prepared to defend our negligent attention to safety on and
around the park.
The ordinance enabling the ulility users tax U.U.T. Specifically articulated resulting
revenue use i.e. pay debt service on the green belt acquisition bond, provide a downtown
police foot beat and monies to help repair our aging sewer systems. The original
ordinance contained a sunset clause stating that the U.U.T. would expire at a date certain.
The question begging for answer is: why after over a decade are Hermosians still paying
a U.U.T. and who made the decision to begin using this tax revenue for general purposes.
Over two decades ago the City created underground utilities districts, resulting in
undergrounding of power poles along PCH and on Pier Ave. Plans had been approved to
underground utilities in the NW portion of the City. Now because the City has been slow
to react to citizens requests, several different groups in Hermosa have began to explore
the feasibility of undergrounding utilities. Why has the issue of undergrounding been left
for the citizens to solve?
We are blessed with first class beaches, great schools and families that show pride in their
neighborhoods. Our community is great except for our streets. For example a drive
down Palm Drive will provide more peaks and valleys than a roller coaster. We have a
First class City and third class streets. Why has street maintenance been neglected?
The hospital district was formed over three decades ago to collect a Tri City tax to
provide funds for local health care. The roll of the district has changed. They have a 60
million -dollar reserve. The district is funded from a property tax assessment. We should
carefully review the continuing need to tax ourselves to support the South Bay hospital
district.
Present zoning standards must be revisited. Allowable height on our western boundaries
must be reduced to provide a better view opportunity for our neighbors to the east.
Sincerely,
Ga B h
ry rutsc
cuu-11, 6/6
JUL-06-99 TUE 14:14III.H.LISSNER
4,0
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
37622887-// P.01
JUL -61999
Total number of pages including this cover sheet 1 C9TYMANAGE^'s,r—
71.
Date July 6, 1999 Time
To/Recipient Hermosa Beach City Council
at fax number auto
voice phone number 318-0216
From/ James Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Sender: Fax number: (310) 376-2287
Voice number: (310) 376-4626 There is an answering
machine on this line and it picks up after 5 rings.
Message: Written communications, Regular council
Tneetingo July 13, 199913, 1999
Councilmembers:
Some of you have noted that you are concerned about the
expansion of liquor businesses on Pier Avenue. Thus I want to
bring to your attention the following.
The former tenant at 517 Pier Avenue has abandoned the interim
liquor license under which he was operating, and the present
tenant has applied to the ABC for a new one. The city council
can protest the issuance of this new license, by writing to the
ABC. Protests must be received by the ABC by 5 p.m. on July
15.
Important: The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain
confidential information from James Lissner. This information is intended
solely for use by the individual or entity named as the recipient hereof.
If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying
distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited_ If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone
immediately so that we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost
to you.
CZ
•,`'�'
'HERMOSA BEACH
FRIENDS of
the LIBRARY
July 7, 1999
Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
RE: HOURS OF OPERATION — HERMOSA BEACH BRANCH LIBRARY
OF THE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM
,JUL - 7 1999
According to the enclosed article which appeared in the Daily Breeze on June 14, the proposed
state budget would give the L.A. County Library System a $2,000,000 increase. This seems like
an opportune time to ask for more weekly hours at the Hermosa Beach Library.
Following is background information on library hours and days:
Pre -Prop 13 50 hrs/wk (Mon. thru Sat.)
After Prop 13 40 hrs/wk .(Tues. thru Sat.)
1993 14 hrs/wk
1994 45 hrs/wk
1995 to present35 hrs/wk (Tues. thru Sat.)
Also attached is the schedule of hours of the 17 libraries in our Region 3. You will note that no
libraries are open on Sunday: 9 of 17 are closed on Monday and 10, or over 1/2, are open more
than our 35 hours per week.
The Hermosa Beach Library Sub -Committee and the elected officers of the HBFOL hold the
opinion that we're not getting our fair share of the $377,000 Hermosa Beach homeowners pay to
the county from their property taxes for yearly library services.
Our citizens are entitled to longer hours and the upgrades and improvements afforded to other
local county libraries. (Manhattan Beach was recently refurbished and Marina del Rey is
scheduled for improvements.)
It is requested that the Hermosa Beach City Council contact our local Supervisor Don Knabe, as
well as the L.A. County Librarian, to remedy this unfair disparity in hours and improvements.
Sincerely,
Charlotte Malone,
Library Sub -Committee
Vice -President HBFOL
550 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California 90254
310/379-8475
LIFE/ARTS B$
High-tech ads
take over world
A COPLEY
NEWSPAPER
Torrance, California
105th year/Number 165
SPORTS D1
Kings may hire
coach today
•
ly
SPORTS D1
Dodgers swept
by Athletics
BUSINESS D10
Port cruise line
keeps up spirit
250 *
MONDAY
June 14, 1999
1999 The Copley Press Inc.
New money speaks volumes for area's libraries
"The influx of
state spending
will be a big
'boon."
— SUSAN KENT,
who oversees the San
Pedro, Wilmington and
Harbor City branches in
the Los Angeles
library system
By Michael Gardner
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE
SACRAMENTO — South Bay library
patrons may soon see extra copies of the latest
best-seller on the shelves, more branches open
on Sundays and shorter lines to get into cyber-
space.
A proposed state budget set to go before the
Legislature on Tuesday would give libraries
throughout the state an extra $20 million to
help restore services decimated during the
recession -racked early 1990s.
The Los Angeles region would take the
biggest share of the money. City libraries
would receive $2.3 million. Another $2 million
would be distributed to the county library sys-
tem, based on an allocation formula of 60
cents per person.
California's libraries were devastated in
1992-93 and in 1993-94 when the state started
transferring property taxes to pay for schools.
"They bled the libraries," recalled Don
Knabe, a Los Angeles County supervisor.
The state's libraries lost a combined $150
million in 1992-93 and 1993-94, according to
Mike Dillon, a lobbyist for the libraries.
Of that, $90 million was taken from
libraries funded by property taxes. Cities and
counties grappling with their own budget trou-
bles lopped another $60 million from local
libraries, Dillon said.
Because the property tax shift is ongoing,
libraries continue to lose money. Libraries
statewide peg the total loss at $400 million.
Library advocates say they also will ask
state lawmakers to place a $2 billion bond mea-
sure on the November 2000 ballot.
They face stiff competition from other bond
proposals, including one to pay for parks,
another for highways and roads, and a third
for water. Legislative leaders are cautious
about asking voters for too much at one time.
More state money for books and staff could
boost support for a library bond measure
among lawmakers like Sen. Debra Bowen, who
said it makes little sense for broke libraries to
build new branches.
LIBRARIES/BACK PAGE
"We're slowly
but surely
building
back up."
— DIANA MORENO,
director of the Independent
Palos Verdes Library
District
•
:ibraries
3OM PAGE A 1
"We want td make sure we don't fund build-
gs that we can't keep open," said the Redon-
Beach Democrat.
Libraries, particularly those formed as spe-
al districts, were dealt a major blow in
,92-93 when the state began to divert their
•operty taxes.
One of the hardest-hit systems in the South
Ay was the independent Palos Verdes Li-
.ary District. The district was forced to close
io branches and eliminate 22 jobs in 1993 to
over an $800,000 shortfall.
"We're slowly but surely building back up,"
•id Diana Moreno, who took over as director
ree years ago.
Palos Verdes' projected share is about
'2,000 out of the $20 million.
The relatively paltry amount — dwarfed by
ie $800,000 loss — didn't deter Moreno from
Olebrating.
"We're thrilled," she said. "Every bit helps."
City librarians also were happy to hear
.ore money may be on the way.
In Torrance, librarian James Buckley said
>me ', of the additional state money likely
ould supplement , the,,,remodeling . fund for
e main library. The $1.6 million project will
convert one floor into more public space and
a children's library. Construction could begin
in late August.
Along with funding from the City Council,
the state aid also could help boost the book
budget, expand the number of . periodicals
available through computers and add staff, he
said.
"This looks like a good year," Buckley said.
Reopening the main library on Sundays
would cost about $60,000 — three-fourths eaf
the estimated $86,000 Torrance would receive
from the state, Buckley said.
Torrance, struggling from a slump in the
aerospace industry, closed libraries on Sun-
days, axed three jobs and spent $66,000 less on
materials during the early 1990s, he said.
Los Angeles library, officials said small and
large branches alike will benefit from the aid
package..
"The influx of state spending will be a big
boon," said Susan Kent, who oversees the San
Pedro, Wilmington and Harbor City branches.
Los Angeles city libraries "suffered like
many institutions," Kent said, but were not
hit as hard as systems that operate as inde-
pendent districts or county libraries.
"We've been very fortunate," she said,
Additional aid will help the libraries: update
book collections and keep pace with new tech-
ology, Kent said.
Among the sacrifices forced on the Los An-
geles County system was the closure and sale of
one Manhattan Beach branch. Nine other coun-
ty branches were shuttered, and others reduced
service to just two or three days a week.
"It really did get bad," said Nancy Mahr,
spokeswoman for county libraries.
The recession and state revenue losses cost
county libraries about $30 million, she said.
Times are better now.
"We're getting.close to feeling like we're on
solid ground," Mahr said.
The proposed budget also includes $39,500
for the Redondo Beach library.
The state gave libraries an extra $19 million
last year. Assembly budget writers wanted to
raise that to $32 million in the new budget, but
couldn't get their Senate counterparts to agree.
The $32 million would have — for the first
time — brought library funding up to the
$70 million level promised by the L<•gislature
17 years ago.
In 1982, the Legislature established a special
fund to help libraries after cities and counties
began feeling the effects of Proposition 13's
property tax reforms.
The promise was never kept. Instead, in the
early 1990s, particularly, libraries were forced
to rely on sympathetic local governments and
private contributions to stay afloat.
,ibraries
;OM PAGE A 1
'We want td make sure we don't fund build-
s that we can't keep open," said the Redon-
Beach Democrat.•
. ibraries, particularly those formed as spe-
d districts, were dealt a major blow in'
when the state began to divert their
3perty taxes.
Jne of the hardest-hit systems in the South
y was the independent Palos Verdes Li-
ary District. The district was forced to close
o branches and eliminate 22 jobs in 1993 to
ver an $800,000 shortfall.
'We're slowly but surely building back up,"
id Diana Moreno, who took over as director
ree years ago.
Palos Verdes' projected share is about
2,000 out of the $20 million.
The relatively paltry amount — dwarfed by
e $800,000 loss — didn't deter Moreno from
lebrating.
"We're thrilled," she said. "Every bit helps."
City librarians also were happy to hear
ore money may be on the way.
In Torrance, librarian James Buckley said
Me- of the additional. state money likely
iuld supplement . the remodeling .'fund for
9
e
main library. The $1.6 million project will
convert one floor into more public space and
a children's library. Construction could begin
in late August.
Along with funding from the City Council,
the state aid also could help boost the book
budget, expand the number of . periodicals
available through computers and add staff, he
said.
"This looks like a good year," Buckley said.
Reopening the main library on Sundays
would cost about $60,000 — three-fourths sof
the estimated $86,000 Torrance would receive
from the state, Buckley said.
Torrance, struggling from a slump in the
aerospace industry, closed libraries on Sun-
days, axed three jobs and spent $66,000 less on
materials during the early 1990s, he said.
Los Angeles library. officials said small and
large branches alike will benefit from the aid
package.
"The influx of state spending will be a big
boon," said Susan Kent, who oversees the San
Pedro, Wilmington and Harbor City branches.
Los Angeles city libraries "suffered like
many institutions," Kent said, but were not
hit as hard as systems that operate 'as inde-
pendent districts or county libraries.
"We've been very fortunate," she said,
Additional aid will help the libraries update
book collections and keep pace with new tech-
ology, Kent said.
Among the sacrifices forced on the Los An-
geles County system was the closure and sale of
one Manhattan Beach branch. Nine other coun-
ty branches were shuttered, and others reduced
service to just two or three days a week.
"It really did get bad," said Nancy Mahr,
spokeswoman for county libraries.
The recession and state revenue losses cost
county libraries about $30 million, she said.
Times are better now.
"We're getting close to feeling like we're on
solid ground," Mahr said.
The proposed budget also includes $39,500
for the Redondo Beach library.
The state gave libraries an extra $19 million
last year. Assembly budget writers wanted to
raise that to $32 million in the new budget, but
couldn't get their Senate counterparts to agree.
The $32 million would have — for the first
time — brought library funding up to the
$70 million level promised by the Le=gislature
17 years ago.
In 1982, the Legislature established a special
fund to help libraries after cities and counties
began feeling the effects of Proposition 13's
property tax reforms.
The promise was never kept. Instead, in the
early 1990s, particularly, libraries were forced
to rely on sympathetic local governments and
private contributions to stay afloat.
Cost Code Sort
•
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PUBLIC LIBRARY
Library Service Hours
REVISED
Wednesday, January 13.' 1999 ' . ''
Cost CodaUbery
Street
City
Zlpcode
Telephone
Mon
.Tue
Wed
Thur
Fri
Sat
Sun
101
Lancaster L bury
401 W. Lancaster Bind
•
Lancaster
'Utterodc
93534
(805)
948-5029
10-8
10-8
108
10-5
10-5
11-5
Cbsed
103
Lkt4rock Lbary
35199 60th Street
93543
(805)
944-4138
12.7
12-7
10.5
10-5
10-5
10-5.
Closed
104
Newhall Lbary
22704 Nest NkMh.Street
Santa Chola
91321
(805)
259-0750
10-8
10-8
10-8
10-6 ,
10-6
10-5.'
Cbsed
106
Lala Los Masks Library
16921 East Avenue O, OA
Palmdale
• 93591
(605)
264-0593
11-7
11-7
10-6
108
10-6
10-5
Cbsed
107
Ban Fernando library
1050 Lbery Steel
San Fernando
91340
(818)
365-8928
114
11-0
11-0
11-7
11-6
Cbsed
Cbsed
110
Quartz HO library
42018 N. 60th Street West
Quartz HW
93536
(805)
943-2454
10-5.
10-1
10-8
10-5
10-5
11-5
Cbsed
112
Canyon Country Library
18536 Soledad Canyon Road
Santa Clarke
91351
(805)
251-2720
10-0
10-8
.10-8
108
10-6
10-5
Cbsed
113
Valencia Library
23743 Nest Valencia Btvd.
Santa Cleft
91355
(805)
259-8942
10-9
10-9
10-9
10-9
10-6
10-5
1 - 5
114 •
La Canada Flhtrldpe Lbary
4545 North Oakwood Avenue •
La Canada Fintridpe
91011
(818)
790-3330
10-8
10-8
108
108
11-5
11-5
Cbsed
115
La Crescents Library
4521 La Crescents Avenue
La Crescents
91214
(818)
248-5313
Closed
10-8
10-8
1-0
10-6
12-S
Cbsed
116 -
Las %vanes Library
29130 West Roadside Drive
/Ago ra Hills
91301
(818)
889-2278
10-8
10.8
10-8
11-5
10-5
10-5
Cbsed
. 117
Matlw Library
23519 West Civic Centr Way
Malibu
90265
(310)
456-6438
10-8
10-8
10-6
10-8
10-5
10-5
Cbsed
118
Westlake Wage Lbery
4371 Park Terrace Drive , ,
'Westlake Wage
91361
(818)
865-9230
Closed
108
10-8
10-5
10-5
11-5
Closed
121 •
Antabpe Valley Bookmobile
601 W. Lancaster Blvd. ,.
Lancaster
93534
(805)
948-0270
9-5
9-5
r 9-5
Office
9-5
Cbsed
Cbsed
122.
Santa Clidta Valley Bookmobile '
22704 West Ninth Street
Santa Clarke . -
91321
(805)
260.1792
9-5
9-5
9-5
Office
9-5 .
Cbsed
Cbsed
123
Les Woerws Bookmobile . •
23519 Weal Civics Cater Way
..
Malibu .
90265
(310)
456-8572
9-5
9.5 -
9.5
Office
95
Cbsed
Cbsed
301
Carson Lbary
151 East Canon Street
Carson
90745
(310)
830-0901
10-8
10-8
10-8
10-8
10.8
10-5
Cbsed
313
Garda a Mayme Dear Llb any
1731 West Gardena Blvd.
Gardena
90247
(110)
323-6363
12-8
12-8
12-8
10-6
108
Cbsed
Cbsed'
314
iHennosa Beech Lbary
550 Pix Avenue
Hermosa Bead1
90254
(310)
379-8475
Cbsed
11-7
12-7
12-7
12-8
10-5
Cbsed
-,' 316
Lrwrdale Mary
14615 Burin Avenue
LswndsIs
90280
(310)
676-0177
Cbsed
1-8
1-8
11-6
11-6
10-5
Cbsed
i 317
Lomita Lbery
24200 Narbonne Avenue
Lomke90717
(310)
539-4515
11-8
11-0
11-0
10-5
10-5
10-5
Cbsed
316
'Manhattan Beads Lbary
1320 Highland Avenue ,
Manhattan Beach
90268
(310)
545-8595
10-9
10-9
10-9
10-8
12-6
10-5
Cbsed
1 320
Masao W. Sato* Lbary
14433 South Crenshaw Blvd.
Gardena
90249
(310)
679-0638
Cbsed
1-8
14
118
11-6
10-5
Cbsed
321
Victoria Park Lbary
17908 South Avalon Blvd. •
Carson
90746
(310)
327.4630
Cbsed
11.8
11-8
12-5
12-5
Cbsed
Cbsed
1 322
Avalon Library
215 SumnerAverue
Avalon
90704
(310)
510-1050
559-1676
Closed
10-8
1-7
10-8
1.7
10-8
1-7
108
10-4
10-6
10-4
10-5
Cbsed
Cbsed
r 330
F
Culver City Library
4975 Overland Avenue
Culver Cly
90230
(310)
r 331 •
Hawthorne Library
12700 South Gravities Avenue
Hawthorne
90250
(310)
879-8193
Closed
11-8
11-8
.10-6
10-5
10-5
Cbsed
333
Lennox Lbrery
4359 Lennox BSA.
Lennox
90304
(310)
674-0385
Closed
11-7
11-7
11-6
11-6
12-5
Cbsed
334
Marina del Rey Lbw), .
4533 Admiralty Way
Marina dei Rey
90292
(310)
8213415
Closed
11-7
12-8
12.8
12-6
10-5
Cbsed
335
West Hollywood Lbrary • .
715 North San Vicente Bbd.
West Hollywood
90069
(310)
652.5340
10-8
10-8
10-8
10-5
10-6
10-5
Cbsed
338
View Park Lbary
3854 West 64th Street
Los Angeles
Hawthorne
90043
90250
(323)
(310)
293-5371 •
643.8880
11-7
Cbsed
11-7
1-8
11-7
18
108
1-8 •
10-5
10-5
10-5
10-5
Cbsed
Cbsed
337
W sebum Library
5335 Wast 135th 8beet
? 338
Wbodcrest Library
1340 West 108t11 Street
Los Anoeles
90044 .,.
(323)
757.9373
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-8
10-5 •
Cbsed
601 \Narwntk
Library
12350 Imperial Hwy.
Norwalk
90650
(562)
868-0775.
10-8
10-8
10-8
10-6
Cbsed
10-5
Cbsed
503
Artesia Lbwy
18722 6. Clarkdate Avenue
Artesia
90701
(562)
865-6614
Cbsed
12-8
12-6
128
12-5
12-5
Cbsed
605
Clifton M. B akenelek Lbary
9945 E. Flower Street
Bellflower
90706
(562)
925-5543
11-8
11-8
11-8
11-6
• -5
11-5
Cbsed
607
Hawekan Gardens Lbary
12100 E. Carson 8L, OE
Hawaiian Gardens
90716
(562)
496-1212
Cbsed
12-8
128
12-6
12-5
12-5
Cbsed
505
La Mirada Library
13800 La Mirada Blvd.
La Mirada
00638
(562)
943-0277
Cbsed
10-8
10-0
10-8
12-5
12-5
Cbsed
609
Moab M. Moobont Library • •
4990 Clark Avenue
Lakewood
90712
(562).
866.1777
10-8
10-8
108
108
10-6
10-5
1-5
611
PasmoutLbary
16254 Colorado Avenue
Paramount
90723
(562)
630-3171
Cbsed
10-8
10-8
108
10-6
1-5
Cbsed
614'
South Wittier Lbary
14433 Lef lnpwel Road
'1l4hktler
90604
(562)
9464415
Cbsed
10-8
10-8
10-8
10-6
10-5
Cbsed
- 615 . '
George Nye, Jr. Library.
66900 Del Amo Blvd. .
Lakewood
90713
(562)
4218497
Cbsed
12-8
12-8
124
12-6
10-5
Cbsed
616 •
Aiondn Lbary
11949 Aiondru Blvd.
Norwalk
90650
(562)
868-7771
Cbsed
12-8
12-8
Cbsed
12-8
11-5
Cbsed
517
Ho8ydas Library -
12000 South Garfield Avenue
South Gate
00280
(562)
634-0156
Cbsed
12-8
128
12.6
12-5
12-5
Cbsed
•
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, June 22, 1999,
at the hour of 7:20 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Geneva Oakes
ROLL CALL:
Present: Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz
Absent: Edgerton
OUTGOING MAYOR'S COMMENTS: Mayor Benz said it had been an
eventful year for him, with the greatest highs (his marriage)
and lows (the loss of friends like Frank Boccato) he has ever
had. He said he had a lot of fun and enjoyed his term as
mayor, that he appreciated the opportunity to serve and was
very humbled to be part of this unique community, made so
great because of the people and their volunteerism.
APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE:
A. Designate Mayor for a term ending April 11, 2000.
Action: To designate Julie Oakes as Mayor for a term
ending April 11, 2000.
Motion Mayor Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending April 11,
2000.
Action: To designate J.R. Reviczky as Mayor Pro Tempore
for a term ending April 11, 2000.
Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor
as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling
dated June 14, 1999.
Action: 1) To appoint Mayor Oakes to the Los Angeles
County - City Selection Committee; 2) to appoint Mayor
Oakes to the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board
of Directors, and Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky as alternate
director; and 3) to appoint Mayor Oakes to the Inglewood
Fire Training Authority, and Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky
as alternate.
Motion Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
D. Reorganization of remaining list of City Council
Committee Assignments.
Action: To postpone all other committee assignments to
the regular meeting of July 13, 1999.
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10003 llaN
Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
E. Presentation of Plaque to Outgoing Mayor by Newly
Appointed Mayor.
Mayor Oakes presented a plaque of appreciation to
outgoing Mayor Benz and thanked him for his service and
for being a consistent voice on the Council.
INCOMING MAYOR'S COMMENTS: Mayor Oakes thanked her husband,
Lee, for his strength, wisdom and support, and her daughter,
Geneva, who often accompanies her in her duties. She said
this has been a very productive City Council, citing some of
its achievements, and thanked everyone for the opportunity to
serve a second term as Mayor. She said she looked forward to
welcoming in the new millennium and said she would continue to
work to improve the aesthetic qualities, viability and
livability of the community.
PRESENTATION:
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO JUSTIN PALMER
FOR WINNING THE HERMOSA BEACH MILLENNIUM
LOGO DESIGN COMPETITION
At the request of Mayor Oakes, Community Resources Director
Rooney spoke of the City's millennium logo design competition,
noting that all the youngsters in the community and students
at Hermosa Valley School were invited to participate. She
said the logo would be used on all the advertisements, banners
and the brochure to celebrate the millennium, noting that the
community celebration will include dedicating the millennium
walkway and the New Year's Eve event.
Mayor Oakes presented a certificate of recognition to Justin
Palmer, winner of the Hermosa Beach millennium logo design
competition. She also presented him with a $200 savings
account certificate donated by Hawthorne Savings.
The meeting recessed at 7:35 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 8:00 P.M.
MAYOR/COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Oakes announced that a
hazardous waste roundup was scheduled for Saturday, July 10,
1999, from 9 A.M. to 3 P.M. at American Honda, 1919 Torrance
Boulevard, Torrance.
Councilmember Benz thanked everyone who attended the opening
of the skateboard track. Mayor Oakes concurred, noting it was
a wonderful event and she was proud to see it so successful.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF JUNE 8, 1999: No
reportable actions.
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10004'
• •
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Shirley Cassell - Hermosa Beach, questioned the
placement of tables on the bridge outside the
Fishack restaurant during the three-day
Memorial Day weekend, since outside dining had
not yet been approved; also questioned the
parking requirements for the site; requested
that consent calendar item 1(j) be pulled;
Lauren Gezurian - 833 14th Street, suggested that
the Council consider screening the east side of
the chain link fence of the skateboard park to
act as a sound barrier and a security measure;
said the park should be enclosed on three
sides, leaving the south side open for seating;
Joyce Howe - Hermosa Beach, expressed concern about
the safety of skateboarders, saying they were
skating across Pier Avenue and in the Von's
Plaza parking lot without regard for traffic;
suggested a police presence outside the
skateboard park to ticket jaywalkers; and
Mordy Benjamin - 14th Street, said the skateboard
park was an attractive nuisance; said there was
a steady flow of skateboarders traveling down
his street from Ocean Drive; said half of the
people at the park did not wear helmets and
thought the park should be carefully monitored.
(b) COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilmember Bowler said plans were
already afoot by staff to move the screens and said there
has been a police presence to enforce safety rules.
Councilmember Reviczky suggested signage advising that
jaywalking was against the law and that citations would
be issued. He said the City would do its part, but that
the skateboarders were in control of their own destiny.
(C) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
1. Letter from Roger Creighton regarding testimony of
Don Macpherson, Jr. before the Subcommittee on
Oversight, of the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
2. Letter from Roger Creighton requesting removal of
Oceanview/Third Street barricades.
Action: To direct staff to respond to the letter.
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10005
•
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
3. Letter from Our Town Productions requesting waiver
of film permit fees.
Coming forward to address the Council at this time was:
Mariellen Kelseaux - Monterey Boulevard, spoke to
her letter, saying this was a non-profit
organization; said this would be a film about
Hermosa Beach and that any proceeds would go to
local charities within the City
Action: To approve the request to allow filming in the
City on the designated weekend dates of July 10-11, July
18, July 25-26, and August 7-8, and to waive the film
permit fees on those designated days of filming, with the
understanding that all other requirements, including the
filing of all permit applications, must be complied with.
Motion Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations
(a) through (s), with the exception of the following item
which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown
in order for clarity: (j)
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
At 8:30 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to
the public hearings starting with item 4.
No one came forward to address the Council on items not
removed from the consent calendar.
(a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES:
1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on May
24, 1999;
2) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on
June 1, 1999; and
3) Minutes of the Adiourned Regular Meeting held on
June 7, 1999.
Action: To approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular
Meetings of May 24, 1999, June 1, 1999, and June 7, 1999,
as presented. (Edgerton absent)
(b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 17568
THROUGH 17674, INCLUSIVE.
Action: To ratify the check register as presented.
(Edgerton absent)
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10006
• •
(C) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE
AGENDA ITEMS.
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented. (Edgerton absent)
(d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE MAY, 1999,
FINANCIAL REPORTS:
(1) Revenue and expenditure report;
(2) City Treasurer's report; and
(3) Investment report.
Action: To receive and file the May, 1999, Financial
Reports as presented. (Edgerton absent)
(e) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP
#24978 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1224 LOMA
DRIVE. Memorandum from Community Development Director
Sol Blumenfeld dated June 1, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-6002, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24978 FOR A THREE -
UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1224 LOMA DRIVE,
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (Edgerton absent)
(f) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM
THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY
COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 1, 1999.
Action: To receive and file the action minutes from the
Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory
Commission meeting of June 1, 1999. (Edgerton absent)
(g) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ANNUAL TAXICAB REPORT.
Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated June 14,
1999.
Action: To receive and file the annual taxicab report,
as recommended by staff. (Edgerton absent)
(h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONSULTING ENGINEERING
AGREEMENT WITH DMR TEAM, INC. FOR A FEE OF $20,090 FOR
THE RESURFACING OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN PIER AVENUE AND
16TH STREET PROJECT NO. CIP 95-150. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 14,
1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) Approve the agreement between the City of Hermosa
Beach and DMR Team, Inc. for a fee of $20,090;
2) Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to
execute said agreement, upon approval as to form by
the City Attorney; and
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10007
® •
3) Authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer
to make adjustments to the scope of work as
necessary within budget. (Edgerton absent)
(i) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE WORK BY JOHN S. MEEK
COMPANY, INC. ON CIP PROJECT NO. 95-620, HERMOSA BEACH
PIER RENOVATION, AND AUTHORIZE FINAL PAYMENT TO THE
CONTRACTOR. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold
Williams dated June 14, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to accept
the work by John S. Meek Company, Inc. of Wilmington, CA,
on CIP Project No. 95-620, Hermosa Beach Pier Renovation,
and authorize final payment to the Contractor (10%
retained for 35 days following filing of Certificate of
Completion). (Edgerton absent)
(j) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE
STREET REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL, CIP #98-141, TO
PAVEMENT COATING COMPANY OF CYPRESS IN THE AMOUNT OF
$79,674.78. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold
Williams dated June 14, 1999.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor
Oakes (at the request of Shirley Cassell) for separate
discussion later in the meeting.
Public Works Director Williams presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) Award the construction contract for the Street
Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal, CIP #98-141, to
Pavement Coating Company of Cypress, California, in
the amount of $79,674.78;
2) Appropriate $12,524 from the Capital Improvement
Fund;
3) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to
attest the Construction Contract subject to approval
by the City Attorney;
4) Direct the City Clerk to reject all other bids and
reject all bid bonds after award by the City
Council; and
5) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor
changes as necessary within budget.
Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
(k) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM
THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 15, 1999.
Action: To receive and file the action minutes from the
Planning Commission meeting of June 15, 1999. (Edgerton
absent)
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10008
• •
(1) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION ADOPTING REGULATIONS
FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO
CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999.
Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June
15, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-6003, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE
PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE
VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2,
1999." (Edgerton absent)
(m) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY APPLICATION TO PRESENT A LATE
CLAIM FILED BY WENDY 0. TRAMMER. Memorandum from
Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated June
16, 1999.
Action: To deny the Application to Present a Late Claim
filed by Wendy 0. Trammer, as recommended by staff.
(Edgerton absent)
(n) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND REFER
THEM TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR.
Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael
Earl dated June 16, 1999.
Claimant:
Date of Loss:
Date Filed:
Claimant:
Date of Loss:
Date Filed:
Armstrong, Erik
5/30/99
6/9/99
Young, Susie
3/24/99
6/10/99
Action: To deny the two claims, as recommended by staff.
(Edgerton absent)
(o) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DECLARING INTEREST TO
ACCEPT JURISDICTION OF ARTESIA BOULEVARD (SR -91) FROM
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (SR -1) TO HARPER AVENUE FROM THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Memorandum from Public Works
Director Harold Williams dated June 17, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-6004, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTEREST TO ACCEPT JURISDICTION OF ARTESIA
BOULEVARD (SR -91) FROM PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (SR -1) TO
HARPER AVENUE FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA." (Edgerton
absent)
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10009
•
(p) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE REQUEST FROM BEACH CITIES
CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP FOR WAIVER OF $1,300 PRECISE
DEVELOPMENT FEE AND THE NOTICE FEE IN EXCHANGE FOR PUBLIC
USE OF THE PARKING LOT WEST OF THE ARCO STATION WHEN NOT
IN USE BY THE CHURCH. Memorandum from City Manager
Stephen Burrell dated June 17, 1999.
Action: To approve the request from Beach Cities
Christian Fellowship to waive the $1,300 Precise
Development Fee and the notice fee in exchange for public
use of the parking lot when not used by the church, as
recommended by staff. (Edgerton absent)
(q) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID FOR CARPETING AND VINYL FOR
COMMUNITY CENTER ROOMS, CITY OFFICES AND CLARK BUILDING
TO A TOUCH OF CARPET FOR $6,838.92. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 16,
1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) Award the bid to A Touch of Carpet for vinyl tiles
for the Community Center (Room 8) and carpeting for
the Community Center (Rooms 4 and 12, theater box
office and hallway), the Clark Building (Library area
and Meeting Room) , and the City offices, for a total
award of $6,838.92; and
2) Authorize the Public Works Director to sign a
contract for work performance. (Edgerton absent)
(r) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PARTICIPATION IN THE LOMA DRIVE
UNDERGROUND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OWNED PARCEL
WHICH IS THE WEST ENTRANCE TO CLARK STADIUM; DIRECT THE
CITY MANAGER TO RETURN THE BALLOT IN FAVOR OF THE
DISTRICT; AND, APPROPRIATE $9,631.37 FROM THE CAPITAL
PROJECTS FUND TO COVER THE EXPENDITURE. Memorandum from
City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 16, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) Approve participation in the assessment district and
direct the City Manager to return the ballot in favor
of the district; and
2) Appropriate $9,631.37 from the Capital Project Fund
to cover the expenditure. (Edgerton absent)
(s) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
AND SEAVIEW DEVELOPMENT. Memorandum from City Manager
Stephen Burrell dated June 17, 1999.
Action: To approve the amendment to the Public
Improvement and Reimbursement Agreement, between the City
and Seaview Development (Beach House Hotel), and direct
the City Manager to execute the amendment on behalf of
the City, as recommended by staff. (Edgerton absent)
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10010
• •
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 99-1192- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
PART 2 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998 CALIFORNIA BUILDING
CODE; PART 3 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998 CALIFORNIA
ELECTRICAL CODE; PART 4 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; PART 5 OF TITLE 24 OF
THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE
1998 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; PART 9 OF TITLE 24 OF
THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE
1998 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; PART 10 OF TITLE 24 OF
THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE
1998 CALIFORNIA CODE FOR BUILDING CONSERVATION; THE
1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE
1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT
OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; AMENDING SAID CODES; AND
AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE." Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling
dated June 16, 1999.
Action: To waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No.
98-1192.
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky.
AYES: Benz, Bowler, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
NOES: Edgerton
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
DISCUSSION
Item 1(j) was heard at this time but is shown
for clarity.
Public comments on items removed from the
calendar are shown under the appropriate item.
SEPARATE
in order
consent
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. APPEAL TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT
TO ALLOW ON -SALE ALCOHOL IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING
RESTAURANT AND TO ADD A DANCING AREA AND LIVE
ENTERTAINMENT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AT 1100 THE STRAND, "SCOTTY'S". Memorandum
from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated
June 16, 1999.
Councilmember Bowler declared a potential conflict of
interest due to the close proximity of his place of
employment and left the dais and the room at 8:30 P.M.
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10011
• s
Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 8:54 P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item was:
Pete Mangurian - 52 llth Street, applicant, said
this was a complex issue and that he needed the
assistance of an attorney; requested that the
hearing be continued for 60 days.
Action: To approve the applicant's request to continue
the public hearing to the September 14, 1999 meeting.
Motion Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Bowler and Edgerton.
Mayor Oakes said those in attendance were welcome to come
forward to speak this evening, if they desired, since this was
an advertised public hearing, noting that they would have the
opportunity to present comments at the September meeting.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Albro Lundy - Strand resident, expressed opposition
to the extension of the bar businesses onto the
Strand toward the residential area; cited
current noise impacts from bar patrons and said
the residents' cars have been vandalized;
Jim Casey - 910-1/2 Strand, expressed concerns about
the increasing problems of noise and littering;
said they did not need another dance club so
close to the residential area; said the Strand
has become a corridor for drunks at night and
suggested the Council walk down the Strand at 2
A.M. five blocks north and south of the pier;
Rick Maloney - owner of 934 Strand, said he was
unable to make changes to his business without
notifying the land owner; said the business
owner made the application and was responsible
for notifying the property owner; said Scotty's
differs from the Pier Avenue businesses because
it faces the Strand;
Tim Personius - 827 14th Street, said his wife's
family lives on the Strand and cited numerous
problems due to public drunkenness; recalled
serious problems in the 70s and said he did not
want the City to move back in that direction;
Shirley Cassell - Hermosa Beach, said none of the
objections voiced tonight had anything to do
with Scotty's, which is a family restaurant;
said the problems are due to other businesses,
not this one;
Cathy Lundy - Hermosa Beach, said Scotty's was a
family restaurant and she loved taking her four
children there; said the composition of the
Pier area is changing from being a family place
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10012
•
to an adults only type of place; said residents
needs places to take their family;
Kyle Lundy - 934 Strand, asked for a show of hands
of residents there tonight in opposition to the
expansion; said bars benefit only outsiders and
some residents; said residents want a community
that benefits everyone and maintains a family
atmosphere;
Steve Hunt - 910 Strand, said the applicant had a
history of continuing his items; opposed the
expansion for alcohol and live entertainment;
said the downtown revitalization was good for
the community, but the problems were becoming
significant, citing an increase in some crimes,
noise and congestion;
Cathy McCurdy - 1004 Ninth Street, asked for the
City Attorney's opinion regarding a possible
conflict of interest for Councilmember Benz
since his wife is a tenant of the applicant
(Councilmember Benz said he would appreciate an
opinion as well); and
Jeff Edwards - 28 10th Court, asked the Council to
consider the effects on the Sea Sprite next
door.
The public testimony ended at 9:10 P.M., at which time
Assistant City Attorney Craig Steele announced that the public
hearing was to be continued to September 14, 1999.
Councilmember Bowler returned to the dais at 9:21 P.M.
5. REVIEW DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ORDERING SAID DELINQUENT CHARGES BE PLACED ON THE
PROPERTY TAX BILL AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. THE
ASSESSMENT WOULD AFFECT ONLY THOSE PROPERTIES WITH REFUSE
BILLS DELINQUENT AS OF APRIL 30, 1999. Memorandum from
City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 14, 1999.
City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 9:27 P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item was:
Danny Sofer - 49 Pier, said he shared trash
collection with several offices and they were
all being charged $40 per month, which he
thought was excessive for the small amount of
trash (City Manager Burrell said he would work
with BFI to resolve the problem).
The public hearing closed at 9:30 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-6005, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING AND
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10013
•
DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT
REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT
THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES."
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
At 9:31 P.M., the order of the agenda resumed with item 2.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
6. LETTER TO GOVERNOR DAVIS SUPPORTING THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FINANCE PROVISIONS IN THE STATE BUDGET. Memorandum from
City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 17, 1999.
City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize
a letter of support for the Local Government Finance
Provisions; and express appreciation to Assemblymember
George Nakano for his efforts as Chair of the Budget
Subcommittee.
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
7. CALLING, GIVING NOTICE AND REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION AND
CERTAIN OTHER RESOLUTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION, NOVEMBER 2, 1999. Memorandum from
City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 14, 1999.
City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
Action: To adopt the following resolutions, as
recommended by staff:
1) Resolution No. 99-6006, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING
OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES";
2) Resolution No. 99-6007, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER
2, 1999, WITH THE SCHOOL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT
DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS
CODE";
3) Resolution No. 99-6008, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10014
• •
BY THE CITY CLERK FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
OF NOVEMBER 2, 1999"; and
4) Resolution No. 99-6009, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL
RUNOFF ELECTION FOR ELECTIVE OFFICES IN THE EVENT OF
A TIE VOTE AT A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD NOVEMBER 2, 1999."
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
8. CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF SIGNATURE VERIFICATION OF AN
INITIATIVE PETITION PROPOSING TO REPEAL CERTAIN MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTIONS AND THEREBY ELIMINATE THE CITY'S UTILITY
USERS TAX. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling
dated June 14, 1999.
City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
Action: To direct staff to determine the fiscal impacts
of the proposed measure and report back to the Council at
the July 13, 1999 regular meeting, deferring action on
the initiative petition until that time.
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None
10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. DEADLINE FOR PLACEMENT OF MEASURES ON THE NOVEMBER
2, 1999 BALLOT. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine
Doerfling dated June 14, 1999.
City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
Action: To direct staff to agendize for the meeting of
July 13, 1999, the consideration of alternate measures
regarding the Utility Users Tax for the November 2, 1999
ballot.
Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Oakes The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
b. VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - EXPIRATION OF
TERMS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling
dated June 16, 1999.
City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
Action: To re -appoint Ruth Brand and Barry Warner to the
Civil Service Board for four-year terms ending July 15,
2003.
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10015
• •
Motion Reviczky, second Benz.
noting the absence of Edgerton.
Action: To appoint Robert Bell and re -appoint Stephen
Francis to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources
Advisory Commission for four-year terms ending June 30,
2003.
Motion Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
Action: To schedule interviews of Planning Commission
applicants for 6:30 P.M. Tuesday, July 13, 1999, prior to
the regular meeting, and to extend the application filing
period to 6 P.M. Wednesday, July 7, 1999.
Motion Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
The motion carried,
11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Cathy McCurdy - spoke to the waiver of fees granted
earlier this evening, expressing concern that
there were no specifics given and no local non-
profit groups mentioned that would benefit.
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, June 22, 1999, at
the hour of 9:45 P.M. to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on
Tuesday, July 13, 1999, at 6:30 P.M. for the purpose of
conduction Planning Commission applicant interviews, to be
followed by the Regular Meeting at the hour of 7:10 P.M.
City Council Minutes 06-22-99 Page 10016
E
IL of
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OFlTHd on Tuesday, June 8he1City
of Hermosa Beach,
at the hour of 7:20 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Andy McGinty
ROLL CALL:
Present: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz
Absent: None
MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Benz announced that the
Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation would be haviuring a
na
"support the arts in Hermosa Beach" fundraiser,
wine -tasting, hors d'oeuvres, art and live entertainment,
silent auction and raffle, to be held Friday, June 11, ,
from 6 P.M. to 9 P.M. in the garden at Barnaby's Hotel at 3501
Sepulveda Boulevard in Manhattan Beach.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF MAY 25, 1999: Meeting
was continued to June 8, 1999.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Daniel Rivelle - Seventh Street, expressed pleasure
with the Pier renovations but was concerned
about the dangers on the Strand; noted that
bicycles were not allowed on sidewalks and
should not be on the City's boardwalk;
Jenny J. - Penthouse magazine model, spoke in favor
of allowing topless bathing suits at the City's
beach; referred to breasts as a celebration of
motherhood;
Name Indistinct - said that there were ridiculous
laws on the books in all cities, but felt "if
it's not broken, don't fix it";
Carol Duff - Chamber of Commerce, presented a check
to the City in the amount of $7,325 for the
fiesta vendor fees; and
Shawn Moonan - Hermosa Beach, spoke to bathing suit
regulations, saying that beaches should be for
G -rated audiences; asked that Council members
set an example and be positive role models for
the children of the community.
(b) COUNCIL COMMENTS: None
(c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1. Letter from John Heltebrake requesting removal of
the barricade on 24th Street, lust west of Pacific
Coast Highway.
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 9995
1 a��
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Benz.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations
(a) through (i), with the exception of the following
items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but
are shown in order for clarity: (a) Reviczky, (g)
Reviczky, and (h) Edgerton.
Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
No one came forward to address the Council on items not
removed from the consent calendar.
At 7:50 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to
the public hearings starting with item 4.
(a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE
1) Minutes of the Regular
1999;
2) Minutes of the Adlourned
2, 1999;
3) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on May 11, 1999;
4) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on May 25, 1999.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by
Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in
the meeting.
Action: To 1) approve as presented the minutes of the
regular meeting of April 17, 1999; 2) approve as
presented the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of
May 2, 1999; 3) approve as presented the minutes of the
regular meeting of May 11, 1999; and 4) approve the
minutes of the regular meeting of May 25, 1999, with the
following amendment: page 9980, paragraph 2, change
"Action" to "Proposed Action" and reflect that the motion
failed, with Edgerton casting the third dissenting vote.
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
FOLLOWING MINUTES:
meeting held on April 17,
Regular meeting held on May
(b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 17409
THROUGH 17567, NOTING VOID CHECK NOS. 17435, 17472 AND
17501, AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 16878
AND 17320, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER.
Action: To ratify the check register as presented.
(c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE
AGENDA ITEMS.
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 9996
• •
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented.
(d) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP
#25094 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 850 7TH
STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director
Sol Blumenfeld dated May 27, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-5995, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
GRANTING APPROVAL OIF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25094 FOR A TWO -
UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 850 7TH STREET,
HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA."
(e) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP
#25252 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1010 FIRST
STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director
Sol Blumenfeld dated May 27, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-5996, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25252 FOR A TWO -
UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1010 FIRST STREET,
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA."
(f) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM
THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUTNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY
COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 4, 1999. Supplemental minutes
received June 7, 1999.
Action: To receive and file the action minutes from the
Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory
Commission meeting of May 4, 1999.
(g) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION SETTING THE FEE FOR
THE PARKING IN LIEU PROGRAM. Memorandum from City
Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 3, 1999.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by
Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in
the meeting.
At 8:25 P.M., Councilmember Bowler left the dais and the
room at due to a potential conflict of interest.
City manager Burrell responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-6001, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
SETTING A FEE IN LIEU OF PROVIDING REQUIRED PARKING
SPACES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE."
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 9997
•
Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Bowler.
(h) RECOMMENDATION TO SET TUESDAY, JULY 13, 1999 AS A PUBLIC
HEARING TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.04.020. Memorandum from City
Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 3, 1999.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by
Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in
the meeting.
City manager Burrell responded to Council questions.
Proposed Action: To drop the
Code amendment at this time.
Motion Oakes, second Edgerton.
the dissenting votes of Bowler,
item and not consider a
The motion failed, noting
Reviczky and Mayor Benz.
Action: To direct that Mayor Benz work with the City
Manager on a list of all antiquated laws that should be
purged from the Municipal Code, and that the list be
brought back to the Council for review and the scheduling
of a public hearing to consider all items.
Motion Oakes, second Bowler. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
(i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE RENEWAL OF THE COOPERATION
AGREEMENT WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO
SIGN THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE MAYOR. Memorandum
from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated
June 3, 1999.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) agree by minute order to renew the Cooperation
Agreement with the Los Angeles County Community
Development Commission (CDC); and
2) authorize the City Manager to sign the Cooperation
Agreement for the Mayor.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
Items 1(a), (g) and (h) were heard at this time but are
shown in order for clarity.
Public comments on items removed from the consent
calendar are shown under the appropriate item.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. 1999-2000 BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 9998
• •
a. ADOPTION OF 1999-2000 BUDGET. Memorandum from Finance
Director Viki Copeland dated May 25, 1999. Supplemental
information from Finance Director Copeland received June
8, 1999.
Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell
also responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 7:55 P.M. As no one came forward
to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed
at 7:55 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) receive and file the questions and answers from the
May 24, 1999 Budget Workshop;
2) direct the City Manager to sign an amended contract
for the City Prosecutor; and
3) adopt Resolution No. 99-5997, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000."
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
b. ADOPTION OF 1999-2000 APPROPRIATION LIMIT. Memorandum
from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 27, 1999.
Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell
also responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 7:55 P.M. As no one came forward
to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed
at 7:55 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-5998, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000."
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
5. ADOPTION OF THE 1997 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE, 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND RELATED PUBLICATIONS
AMENDING CHAPTER 15, SECTIONS 15.04 THROUGH 15.24 OF THE
HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. Memorandum from Community
Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 17, 1999.
Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 9999
The public hearing opened at 7:57 P.M. As no one came forward
to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed
at 7:57 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) adopt Resolution No. 99-5999, entitled "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS
THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE,
CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE,
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, AND CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL
CODE, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NOS. 99-1192 AND 99-1192U,
ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY BECAUSE OF LOCAL CLIMATIC,
GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS,"
2) waive full reading and adopt Urgency Ordinance No.
99-1192U, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE PART 2 OF TITLE
24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE
1998 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; PART 3 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; PART 4 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; PART 5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; PART 9 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPARISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; PART 10 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA CODE FOR BUILDING CONSERVATION; THE 1997
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1997 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOF THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUIDLINGS; AMENDING SAID CODES, AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE
HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE; AND DECLARING THE URGENCY
THEREOF," and
3) waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 99-
1192, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE PART 2 OF TITLE
24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE
1998 CALIFORNIA BUIDLING CODE; PART 3 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; ;PART 4 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; PART 5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; PART 9 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFOLRNIA FIRE CODE; PART 10 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, COMPRISING THE 1998
CALIFORNIA CODE FOR BUILDING CONSERVATION; THE 1997
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1997 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS; AMENDING SAID CODES; AND AMENDING TITLE 15 OF
THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE."
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 10000
• •
6. HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 1999-2000. Memorandum from Public Works
Director Harold Williams dated June 1, 1999.
Public Works Director Williams presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 8:02 P.M. As no one came forward
to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed
at 8:02 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. 99-6000, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND LEVYING
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1999,
AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2000, IN CONNECTION WITH THE HERMOSA
BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1999-
2000."
Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. IMG BEACH BASH PLAZA CONCERT BANDS. Memorandum from
Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1,
1999.
Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff
report and responded to Council questions.
Public participation opened at 8:15 P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item was:
James Leitz - IMG vice president, responded to
Council questions and apologized for the change
in bands at this late date.
Public participation closed at 8:18 P.M.
Action: To approve the proposed Plaza concerts from 4:00
P.M. to 6:30 P.M. Friday, June 11, 1999, through Sunday,
June 13, 1999, in conjunction with the Mervyns' Beach
Bash, as recommended by staff.
Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
At 8:20 P.M. the order of the agenda returned to item 3.
8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None
9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None
10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 10001
•
CITIZEN COMMENTS
No one came forward to address the Council at this time.
ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN
CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPROVAL OF CLOSED SESSION MINUTES:
1) Minutes of meeting held on March 23, 1999;
2) Minutes of meeting held on April 13, 1999;
3) Minutes of meeting held on April 27, 1999; and
4) Minutes of meeting held on May 25, 1999.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Existing Litigation,
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal
counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice
the position of the City in the litigation.
Name of Case: Macpherson v. City of Hermosa Beach
Case Number: BC172546
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - The Regular Meeting of the City
Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday,
June 8, 1999, at the hour of 9:05 P.M. to a closed session.
RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - The Closed Session convened at the
hour of 9:20 P.M. At the hour of 10:10 P.M. the Closed
Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting.
ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS - There were no decisions made requiring a
public announcement.
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, June 8, 1999, at
the hour of 10:11 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, June
22, 1999, at the hour of 7:10 P.M.
City Council Minutes 06-08-99 Page 10002
VOUCHRE2
06/16/99 14:09
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
17675 06/16/99 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 001-1103 298,715.35
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 105-1103 6,673.11
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 109-1103 731.76
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 110-1103 27,075.27
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 117-1103 1,167.93
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 126-1103 81.71
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 140-1103 26.43
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 145-1103 1,420.32
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 146-1103 128.45
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 152-1103 41.71
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 160-1103 7,134.72
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 705-1103 2,324.94
PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-99 715-1103 3,002.99 348,524.69
TOTAL CHECKS 348,524.69
1
1ti
VOUCHRE2
06/16/99 14:09
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 298,715.35
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 6,673.11
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 731.76
110 PARKING FUND 27,075.27
117 AB939 FUND 1,167.93
126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 81.71
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 26.43
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,420.32
146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 128.45
152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 41.71
160 SEWER FUND 7,134.72
705 INSURANCE FUND 2,324.94
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,002.99
TOTAL 348,524.69
1
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2
06/17/99 18:05
---> VOID CHECKS
CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
I
017719 VOID
3
PAGE 1
VOUCHRE2
06/17/99 18:05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
•
17676 06/17/99 000138 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPLIES
17677 06/17/99 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 2 WAY RADIO MAINT/MAY 99
2 WAY RADIO MAINT/MAY 99
2 WAY RADIO MAINT/MAY 99
17678 06/17/99 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR
17679 06/17/99 008284 AIRTEL PLAZA HOTEL
CELL PHONE CHARGES/MAY 99
CELL PHONE CHARGES/MAY 99
CELL PHONE CHARGES/MAY 99
LODGING/STRATIS/POST CLASS
17680 06/17/99 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV
17681 06/17/99 006421 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT/MAY 99
17682 06/17/99 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE SHOP TOWELS SERVICE/MAY 99
17683 06/17/99 009357 ASAN CONSTRUCTION CO. SKATE TRACK CONTRACT
17684 06/17/99 009500 AT&T
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES/MAY 99
17685 06/17/99 009511 FRANK BARAN 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
17686 06/17/99 007286 DOROTHY BARNETT 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
17687 06/17/99 006079 BAY CITIES ROOFING ROOF REPAIRS/CITY HALL
17688 06/17/99 006329 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR ENGINEERING CONTRACT MYRTLE
ENGINEERING CONTRACT LOMA DR
17689 06/17/99 005464 BILL'S SOUND SYSTEM CHAMBER SOUND SYSTEM MAIN/MAY
17690 06/17/99 008522 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC. MEDICAL SUPPLIES/MAY 99
17691 06/17/99 003870 MARY BOICE
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
17692 06/17/99 000155 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTR MEDICAL WASTE REMOVAL/MAY 99
WASTE REMOVAL/JUNE 99
17693 06/17/99 008585 AARON BUSH
REGISTRATION REIMBURSMENT
17694 06/17/99 000034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPOR FORMS PRINTED
FORMS PRINTED
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
153-2106-5401
110-3302-4201
001-2101-4201
001-2201-4201
001-2101-4304
001-4202-4304
001-2201-4304
001-2101-4312
001-2102-4201
001-2201-4309
001-2201-4309
126-8525-4201
001-4202-4304
001-4202-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-4202-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
105-3105
105-3105
001-4204-4201
306-8182-4201
306-8183-4201
001-4204-4201
001-2201-4309
105-3105
001-2101-4201
109-3301-4201
001-2201-4317
001-4202-4305
001-4202-4305
ITEM
AMOUNT
207.59
352.50
1,504.60
376.15
406.84
86.54
2.06-
235.98
2,686.77
10.09
12.05
42,496.20
8.81
8.61
8.36
8.36
10.96
8.69
8.36
8.39
24.61
24.61
950.00
625.00
625.00 1,250.00
130.00 130.00
36.00 36.00
24.61 24.61
35.28
383.01 418.29
227.00 227.00
161.24
242.27 403.51
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
207.59
2,233.25
491.32
235.98
2,686.77
10.09
12.05
42,496.20
70.54
24.61
24.61
950.00
VOUCHRE2
06/17/99 18:05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
• •
17695 06/17/99 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT
17696 06/17/99 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC
17697 06/17/99 007611 CARMEN'S UNIFORM
17698 06/17/99 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET
17699 06/17/99 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY
17700 06/17/99 009110 CONCEPT MARINE
17701 06/17/99 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS
17702 06/17/99 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
17703 06/17/99 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL
17704 06/17/99 006178 DOMINO COMPUTER CENTER
17705 06/17/99 009507 E -Z UP FACTORY OUTLET
17706 06/17/99 007732 ROBERT S. ERHART
17707 06/17/99 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
EXTRA CLEANING DOWNTOWN/5/29
WATER BILLING/JUNE 99
RETROFIT FINANCE CHARGES
WATER BILLING/MAY 99
WATER BILLING/MAY 99
WATER BILLING/MAY 99
UNIFORM/GILL
AUTO PART PURCHASE/JUNE 99
COMPUTER SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
REMANUFACTURED CARTRIDGES/6/99
PIER RETROFIT PROJECT CONTRACT
OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
HWY MAINT/APRIL 99
FILM PURCHASE/MAY 99
COMPUTER PURCHASE/JUNE 99
3 COMPUTERS
CANOPIES FOR DAY CAMP
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 99
EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 99
17708 06/17/99 009093 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORAT SIREN CONTROL/DETECTIVE UNIT
DETECTIVE UNIT EQUIPMENT
SPEAKERS/DETECTIVE UNITS
17709 06/17/99 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES
17710 06/17/99 008266 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES
17711 06/17/99 009508 BONNIE FOLKART
17712 06/17/99 009512 MICHAEL FONG
17713 06/17/99 001318 GAMETIME
LIABILITY TRUST /APRIL & MAY
WORKER'S COMP ADMIN/JUNE 99
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
REFUND TOWING CHARGES
REFUND TOWING CHARGES
SWING HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99
17714 06/17/99 000638 GUILLERMO GARCIA WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND
5
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
109-3301-4201
105-2601-4303
001-4202-4303
105-2601-4303
001-4202-4303
001-4204-4303
001-2101-4317
715-2101-4311
001-2101-4201
001-1206-4309
121-8620-4201
001-1208-4305
105-2601-4251
001-2101-4305
001-1206-5402
001-4601-4308
105-3105
105-3101
001-4202-4201
001-1201-4305
715-2101-5403
715-2101-5403
715-2101-5403
705-1209-4324
705-1217-4201
105-3105
105-3101
001-3841
110-3302-4201
001-4202-4309
001-2110
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,200.00
79.90
1,056.74
834.63
2,840.75
501.70
360.81
84.38
273.56
163.56
12,687.75
1,587.96
639.59
147.54
3,750.86
807.96
24.61
41.45
14.00
39.75
75.01
2,102.70
250.88
11,671.14
2,333.33
24.61
82.90
40.00
69.50
547.86
3,200.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,200.00
5,313.72
360.81
84.38
437.12
12,687.75
1,587.96
639.59
147.54
3,750.86
807.96
66.06
53.75
2,428.59
11,671.14
2,333.33
107.51
109.50
547.86
3,200.00
VOUCHRE2
06/17/99 18:05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
• *
17715 06/17/99 009516 TEMPLE GRACE
17716 06/17/99 007953 GEN A GREANEY
17717 06/17/99 007721 HELENA F. GRILL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 99
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
17718 06/17/99 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
BILLING/MAY 99
17720 06/17/99 000387 HANSON AGGREGATES WEST, BASE ROCK PURCHASE/JUNE 99
BASE ROCK PURCHASE/JUNE 99
17721 06/17/99 009465 HAVIS SHIELDS EQUIPMENT MAGNUM SPOTLIGHT/POLICE CAR
PRISONER TRANSPORT UNIT
17722 06/17/99 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECKS/4/7-4/19/99
17723 06/17/99 000322 HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY VET SERVICE/JUNE 99
17724 06/17/99 002566 VIVIAN HOFFMAN
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
17725 06/17/99 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/MAY 99
17726 06/17/99 009509 IMOGENE JAMES
17727 06/17/99 006293 KINKO'S INC.
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
POSTER MOUNTING/MAY 99
LAMINATING SERVICE/MAY 99
COPIES/MAY 99
BLUEPRINT COPIED/MAY 99
17728 06/17/99 007136 THE LAKES AT EL SEGUNDO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 99
17729 06/17/99 006906 CHARLES L. LIVERGOOD 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-3115
001-4601-4221
105-3105
001-4204-4321
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-1121-4304
001-1131-4304
001-1132-4304
001-1141-4304
001-1201-4304
001-1202-4304
001-1203-4304
001-1206-4304
001-1208-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2201-4304
001-4101-4304
001-4201-4304
001-4202-4304
001-4601-4304
110-1204-4304
110-3302-4304
001-3104-4309
001-3104-4309
715-2101-5403
715-2101-5403
001-4201-4201
110-3302-4201
105-3105
001-3104-4309
105-3105
001-4601-4308
001-4202-4201
001-4202-4201
001-4202-4201
001-4601-4221
ITEM
AMOUNT
377.00
252.00
24.61
42.67
61.09
61.09
5.42
1.36
2.71
21.69
23.04
52.86
33.89
35.24
2.71
409.35
173.50
24.40
39.31
273.81
155.88
27.11
73.20
324.87
337.65
212.50
6,130.00
2,867.23
35.00
24.61
120.16
24.61
34.10
4.33
305.37
12.99
500.50
105-3105 24.61
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
377.00
252.00
24.61
1,520.33
662.52
6,342.50
2,867.23
35.00
24.61
120.16
24.61
356.79
500.50
24.61
VOUCHRE2
06/17/99 18:05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
• •
17730 06/17/99 008841 LOS ANGELES KINGS
17731 06/17/99 000605 MANHATTAN FORD
17732 06/17/99 008286 MATCO TECH
17733 06/17/99 008457 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SPRING 99 HOCKEY CLINIC
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
CREDIT RETURNED MERCHANDISE
SCORE BOARD REPAIRS LABOR
SCORE BOARD CONTROLLER REPAIRS
COPIER USAGE MAY 99
COPIER USAGE MAY 99
COPIER USAGE MAY 99
COPIER USAGE MAY 99
COPIER USAGE MAY 99
17734 06/17/99 008170 MUNICIPAL MAINT. EQUIPM STEERING COLUMN BASE
17735 06/17/99 007827
17736 06/17/99 008202
17737 06/17/99 00848?
17738 06/17/99 000949
17739 06/17/99 006630
17740 06/17/99 007161
MUTUAL PROPANE
DARRYL POWERS
PRO MEDIX
DAVID RICKEY
OSCAR RIVERA
SMITH & HAWKEN
17741 06/17/99 009514 SOCAL FPO
PROPANE FOR GO -4'S
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT
REPLACE DAMAGED PROPERTY
REFUND OF GYM FEES
TEAK OUTDOOR BENCHES
TUITION/OSEKOWSKY
17742 06/17/99 008812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBL DISGUISE ANTENNA FOR MUSTANG
17743 06/17/99 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS
17744 06/17/99 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
OXYGEN TANKS/APRIL
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 99
17745 06/17/99 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLING/MAY 99
GAS BILLING/MAY 99
GAS BILLING/JUNE 99
17746 06/17/99 000146 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WAT DISPENSER RENTAL/APRIL 99
17747 06/17/99 008370 JENNIE C. SPETH
MILEAGE REIMBURSMENT/POST
17748 06/17/99 000364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT APPS/MAY 99
7
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-4601-4221
715-3302-4311
715-3302-4311
001-4202-4201
001-4202-4201
001-1208-4201
001-4601-4201
001-1208-4201
001-2201-4201
110-3302-4201
715-3302-4311
715-3302-4311
001-2201-4317
001-2201-4309
001-3902
001-2111
109-8160-5402
001-2201-4317
715-2101-4311
001-3104-4309
001-4204-4303
105-2601-4303
160-3102-4303
105-2601-4303
001-3104-4303
001-4202-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-2201-4309
001-2101-4312
001-2101-4201
ITEM
AMOUNT
532.00
240.14
161.54-
187.50
543.41
130.90
44.63
68.43
44.63
8.91
208.74
99.55
309.80
172.29
225.00
120.00
19,266.76
100.00
182.82
30.00
6,444.58
33.18
95.13
262.85
643.32
1,495.92
92.16
46.53
154.51
2.50
58.50
504.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
532.00
78.60
730.91
297.50
208.74
99.55
309.80
172.29
225.00
120.00
19,266.76
100.00
182.82
30.00
8,974.98
293.20
2.50
58.50
504.00
VOUCHRE2
06/17/99 18:05
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
17749 06/17/99 009198 STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS SUMMER SUNSET CONCERT SERIES 001-4601-4201 10,000.00 10,000.00
17750 06/17/99 007950 NICK STRATIS MEALS/DARE TRAINING CLASS 001-2101-4312 84.00 84.00
17751 06/17/99 008346 STRUCTURAL INSPECTION INSPECTION/PARKING STRUCTURE 001-4202-4201 1,268.00 1,268.00
17752 06/17/99 009000 MARIA THOMAS 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE 105-3105 24.61 24.61
17753 06/17/99 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-3104-4309 122.35
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 13.60
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 13.60 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-3104-4309 87.08
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 9.68
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 9.68 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-4202-4309 68.95
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 7.66
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 7.66 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-3104-4309 109.89
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 12.21
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 12.21 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 160-3102-4309 52.90
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 5.88
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 5.88 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-4202-4309 37.14
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 4.13
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 4.13 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 105-2601-4309 266.37
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 29.60
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 29.60 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 160-3102-4309 150.49
DISCOUNTS OFFERED 001-2021 16.72
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 16.72 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-3104-4309 267.91
DISCOUNTS OFFERED 001-2021 29.77
DISCOUNTS TAKEN 001-2022 29.77 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-4202-4309 98.27
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 10.92
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 10.92 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-4204-4309 41.08
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 4.56
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 4.56 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 105-2601-4309 122.43
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 13.60
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 13.60 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 105-2601-4309 162.27
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 18.03
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 18.03 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 160-3102-4309 68.07
DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 7.56
DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 7.56 -
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-3104-4309 24.63
8
VOUCHRE2
06/17/99 18:05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
• •
17754 06/17/99 004768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE
17755 06/17/99 009078 VAN HERRICK'S
17756 06/17/99 006274 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
17757 06/17/99 009510 ZEEN PLUMBING
17758 06/17/99 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
HP PRINTER PURCHASE
MAINTENANCE CHRISTMAS LOT
JURY INSTRUCTION UPDATE
WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND
SIGNS FOR SOUTH PARK/MAY 99
SIGNS FOR SKATEBOARD PARK
SIGNS FOR VALLEY PARK
TOTAL CHECKS
9
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2021
001-2022
001-1206-5401
001-4202-4201
001-1132-4305
001-2110
125-8506-4309
125-8506-4309
125-8506-4309
ITEM
AMOUNT
2.74
2.74-
998.07
1,672.65
174.55
1,600.00
192.81
376.52
148.95
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,679.83
998.07 •
1,672.65
174.55
1,600.00
718.28
163,007.46
• •
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
06/17/99 18:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 57,663.74
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 2,771.67
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 20,849.77
110 PARKING FUND 566.22
121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 12,687.75
125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 718.28
126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 42,496.20
153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 207.59
160 SEWER FUND 366.59
306 LOMA/MYRTLE UNDRGRND DISTRICT 1,250.00
705 INSURANCE FUND 14,004.47
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 9,425.18
TOTAL 163,007.46
10
PAGE 8
VOUCHRE2
06/22/99 08:49
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
17759 06/22/99 009519 BILL'S FENCING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 001-2140 2,160.00 2,160.00
17760 06/22/99 008836 LONG BEACH AQUARIUM OF SUMMER EXCURSION/JUNE 23,1999 001-4601-4201
760.50 760.50
TOTAL CHECKS 2,920.50
11
VOUCHRE2
06/22/99 08:49
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 2,920.50
TOTAL 2,920.50
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2
06/24/99 17:31
---> VOID CHECKS
CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
017787 VOID
13
PAGE 1
VOUCHRE2
06/24/99 17:31
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
17761 06/24/99 002744 A & E TROPHIES
17762 06/24/99 009347 A.BIEDERMAN INC.
17763 06/24/99 006230 ADVANCED CONSTRUCTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MAYOR'S PLAQUE
GAUGES FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
TENNIS COURT CONTRACT
17764 06/24/99 009411 AFFORDABLE RADIUS MAPS 300' RADIUS NOTICING/JUNE 99
17765 06/24/99 009331 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINE SOILS TESTING/TENNIS COURTS
17766 06/24/99 009519 BILL'S FENCING
17767 06/24/99 008522 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC.
17768 06/24/99 007954 CA EMS PERSONNEL FUND
17769 06/24/99 000262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVI
17770 06/24/99 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC
17771 06/24/99 000634 CHEVRON USA, INC.
17772 06/24/99 000456 CLEARS SOUTHERN CHAPTER
17773 06/24/99 009110 CONCEPT MARINE
17774 06/24/99 003674 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL S
17775 06/24/99 000022 THE COPY SHOP
17776 06/24/99 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS
17777 06/24/99 009522 MARILEE COSGROVE
17778 06/24/99 008855 D & D DISPOSAL INC.
17779 06/24/99 004689 DATA TICKET, INC.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
MEDICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
PARAMEDIC LICENSE RENEWAL
BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAMP
WATER BILLING/JUNE 99
WATER BILLING/JUNE 99
WATER BILLING/JUNE 99
GAS CARD BILLING/JUNE 99
ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP/SPETH
PIER RETROFIT PHASE II
RETURNED MERCHANDISE/MAY 99
RETURNED MERCHANDISE/MAY 99
RETURNED MERCHANDISE/MAY 99
TESTING MATERIALS/5/06/99
TESTING MATERIAL/MAY 99
TESTING MATERIALS/MAY 99
METER WORK ORDER PADS
TASK CHAIRS
KEYBOARD STAND
TONER FOR RECORDS FAX
OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
CREDIT RETURNED MERCHANDISE
SUMMER BEACH BLAST TRAINING
DEAD ANIMAL DISPOSAL
DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/APRIL 99
DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/MAY 99
17780 06/24/99 006100 DATAVAULT OFF SITE STORAGE/MAY 99
I"
•
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-1101-4319
715-2201-4311
126-8526-4201
001-4101-4201
126-8526-4201
001-2140
001-2201-4309
001-2201-4315
001-4201-4305
105-2601-4303
001-4202-4303
001-4204-4303
715-2101-4310
001-2101-4317
121-8621-4201
001-1203-4201
001-1203-4201
001-1203-4201
001-1203-4201
001-1203-4201
001-1203-4201
110-3302-4305
001-4601-5401
001-2101-4305
001-2101-4305
001-1208-4305
001-1208-4305
001-4601-4201
110-3302-4201
110-1204-4201
110-1204-4201
001-1206-4201'
ITEM
AMOUNT
79.78
54.76
78,075.00
4,410.00
1,347.00
2,160.00
46.00
130.00
29.23
955.41
5,282.99
630.55
161.42
25.00
3,163.73
35.00-
35.00-
35.00-
346.50
660.00
462.00
238.15
270.63
54.13
83.82
202.38
1.52-
200.00
200.00
61.53
299.25
137.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
79.78
54.76
78,075.00
4,410.00
1,347.00
2,160.00
46.00
130.00
29.23
6,868.95
161.42
25.00
3,163.73
1,363.50
238:15
609.44
200.00
200.00
360.78
137.00
VOUCHRE2
06/24/99 17:31
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
17781 06/24/99 009534 DELL COMPUTER CORPORATI COMPUTER & MONITOR
COMPUTER & MONITOR
WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND
SHELTER COST/MAY 99
HWY MAINT/DEC 99
17782 06/24/99 009533 DENNICK CONSTRUCTION
17783 06/24/99 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA
17784 06/24/99 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
17785 06/24/99 009112 DMR TEAM
17786 06/24/99 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO
17788 06/24/99 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
PHASE 2 MONTEREY & 19TH
TENNIS COURT PROJECT
SKATE TRACK CONTRACT
P AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
CREDIT RETRURNED MERCHANDISE
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
WRENCH PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 99
EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 99
EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 99
17789 06/24/99 008931 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES,TR WORKER COMP CLAIMS/6/1-6/15/99
17790 06/24/99 009520 FRANKLIN COVEY
CALENDAR TABS REFILL
17791 06/24/99 005314 FRY'S ELECTRONICS COMPUTER SOFTWARE PURCHASE
15
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
153-2106-5402
153-2106-5402
001-2110
110-3302-4251
105-2601-4251
301-8143-4201
126-8526-4201
126-8525-4201
715-2101-4311
715-2101-4311
715-2101-4311
715-3302-4311
715-2601-4311
715-4206-4309
715-3302-4311
715-2101-4311
715-3302-4311
715-3302-4311
715-4202-4311
715-2101-4311
715-3302-4311
715-4202-4311
715-2101-4311
715-3302-4311
715-3104-4311
715-2101-4311
715-3302-4311
715-4202-4311
715-2101-4311
715-3302-4311
715-4206-4311
715-4206-4309
715-2101-4311
715-3302-4311
715-4206-4311
715-4206-4309
001-1203-4201
001-4202-4201
001-4202-4201
705-1217-4324
001-4202-4305
001-1121-4201
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,176.70
1,453.82
1,600.00
67.38
740.64
11,230.00
2,457.00
3,101.00
16.09
65.31
86.96
19.41
1.85
34.99
1.27-
59.53
23.74
2.71
90.26
29.67
4.17
23.54
19.10
32.48
12.44
4.39
72.96
43.24
72.33
4.35
81.18
13.74
15.98
21.65
96.49
20.15
17.75
16.25
14.00
23,491.72
15.59
140.71
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,630.52
1,600.00
67.38
740.64
16,788.00
967.44
48.00
23,491.72
15.59
140.71
1
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
06/24/99 17:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 4
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
17792 06/24/99 008803 GOLD GRAPHICS 4TH OF JULY FLAGS INSTALLED 001-3104-4201 450.00 450.00
17793 06/24/99 008071 GORDON H. CHONG & ASSOC PARKING STRUCTURE CONTRACT 121-8624-4201 5,983.34 5,983.34
17794 06/24/99 000059 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCR PUBLICATION 001-1141-4305 55.95 55.95
17795 06/24/99 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 001-1206-4304 275.98
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 110-3302-4304 65.04
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 001-2101-4304 1,481.84
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 001-4204-4321 56.08
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 001-2201-4304 221.11
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 001-4601-4304 79.73
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 001-4202-4304 122.52
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 001-4201-4304 68.68
PHONE BILLING/MAY 99 110-1204-4304 32.64
PHONE BILLING/JUNE 99 001-4601-4304 42.73
17796 06/24/99 009524 HAWKIN MACHINE & TOOL C WINDMILL PARTS/JUNE 99 001-2125 785.00
17797 06/24/99 005824 PENNY HENDRICKS DEPOSIT REFUND
17798 06/24/99 003131 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS 2ND GIRT SALES TAX AUDIT 001-1202-4201 900.00
17799 06/24/99 003432 HOME DEPOT/GECF TESTER PURCHASE/MAY 99 105-2601-4309 20.03
HARDWARD PURCHASES/MAY 99 105-2601-4309 28.46
LUMBER PURCHASE/MAY 99 160-3102-4309 22.19
HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 99 001-4601-4309 40.33
LUMBER PURCHASE/MAY 99 160-3102-4309 131.85
17800 06/24/99 007587 HOZIE'S RADIATOR RADIATOR RECOREDI/MAY 99 715-4206-4311 200.26
17801 06/24/99 007880 JAMESTOWN PRESS BUSINESS CARD PURCHASE 001-1208-4305 64.95
17802 06/24/99 009493 DIANE JOHNSON OVER THE LINE TOURNAMENT 001-4601-4221 409.50
17803 06/24/99 000167 LEARNED LUMBER STAKES 110-3302-4305 28.24
PARTS FOR WINDMILL 001-2125 156.66
SAND FOR WINDMILL 001-2125 29.39
LUMBER PURCHASE/JUNE 99 105-2601-4309 33.43
LUMBER PURCHASE/JUNE 99 001-4204-4309 75.31
17804 06/24/99 001359 THE LIGHTHOUSE INC. AMBER LENS 715-3302-4311 7.77
001-1101-4317 56.57
001-2111 500.00
17805 06/24/99 002286 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMIS PUBLICATIONS
17806 06/24/99 009518 MC CAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY TRAFFIC SIGN HARDWARE 105-8157-4309 1,934.17
TRAFFIC SIGN HARDWARE 105-8157-4309 958.01
TRAFFIC SIGN HARDWARE 105-8157-4309 920.13- 1,972.05
2,446.35
785.00
500.00
900.00
242.86
200.26
64.95
409.50
323.03
7.77
56.57
17807 06/24/99 001911 MEDICAL INSTITUTE MEDICAL EXAMS/APRIL 99
1!0
001-1203-4320 309.00
309.00
VOUCHRE2
06/24/99 17:31
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
17808 06/24/99 008975 MOBIL FLEET
17809 06/24/99 006142 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
17810 06/24/99 000321 PACIFIC BELL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 99
POLICE RECRUITMENT AD
COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/JUNE 99
COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/JUNE 99
COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/MAY 99
COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/JUNE 99
COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/MAY 99
COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/JUNE 99
17811 06/24/99 009513 PACIFIC COAST CONSTRUCT WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND
17812 06/24/99 007541 LOUISE PALERMO
17813 06/24/99 000097 POSTMASTER
17814 06/24/99 008482 PRO MEDIX
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 99
ANNUAL P.O. BOX 695 FEE
MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT
17815 06/24/99 008364 PVP COMMUNICATIONS,INC. MOTORCYCLE HELMET
17816 06/24/99 008768 QUADRANT SYSTEMS
17817 06/24/99 009356 QUALITY SILKSCREEN
17818 06/24/99 003991 BARRY REED
17819 06/24/99 002927 REGISTRAR -RECORDER
17820 06/24/99
CASH REGISTER TAPE
SUMMER CAMP SHIRTS
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 99
SIGNATURE VERIFICATION/UUT
005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
17821 06/24/99 009535 RIVIERA GLASS
BILLING/DEC 98
BILLING/APRIL 99
BILLING/APRIL 99
BILLING/APRIL 99
BILLING/APRIL 99
BILLING/APRIL 99
BILLING/APRIL 99
BILLING/APRIL 99
BILLING/APRIL 99
DOOR FOR BASE III
17822 06/24/99 009521 ROAD WORKS TRAFFIC CONTROL SEMINAR
11
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
715-2101-4310
715-4201-4310
715-4202-4310
715-3302-4310
715-4601-4310
715-2601-4310
715-4204-4310
001-1250
715-1236
001-1203-4201
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2110
001-4601-4221
001-2101-4305
001-2201-4309
001-2101-4187
110-1204-4305
001-4601-4308
001-4601-4221
001-1121-4251
001-1131-4201
001-1131-4201
001-1131-4201
001-1131-4201
001-1131-4201
001-1131-4201
001-1131-4201
001-1203-4201
001-1131-4201
001-4204-4201
001-4202-4317
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,377.28
68.22
235.48
337.83
42.97
191.53
10.71
77.17
123.52
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,464.71
205.92 205.92
3.34
3.46
6.70
56.52
118.43
117.87 306.32
1,600.00 1,600.00
1,232.00 1,232.00
64.00 64.00
230.50 230.50
679.09 679.09
132.50 132.50
995.09 995.09
3,057.60 3,057.60
618.80 618.80
1,963.42
4,763.55
318.45
110.55
31.60
11,857.95
46.00
3,202.80
3,953.00 26,247.32
2,400.00 2,400.00
97.50 97.50
VOUCHRE2
06/24/99 17:31
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
s
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
17823 06/24/99 001046 SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY UNIFORM PURCHASE/GAGLIA
17824 06/24/99 000320 SHELL OIL CO.
GAS CARD PURCHASES/JUNE 99
17825 06/24/99 009353 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SPRING 99
17826 06/24/99 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP FIRE DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES/6/99
PRISONER SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
17827 06/24/99 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STREET LIGHT BILLING/JUNE 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/JUNE 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/JUNE 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/JUNE 99
17828 06/24/99 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLING/JUNE 99
GAS BILLING/JUNE 99
OFFICE CHAIR' PURCHASE
REIMBURSEMENT/WINDMILL PARTS
17829 06/24/99 009532 STAPLES
17830 06/24/99 008963 STEVE STORM
17831 06/24/99 009153 TOSCO FLEET SERVICES
GAS PURCHASES/OCT 98
GAS PURCHASES/OCT 98
GAS PURCHASES/OCT 98
17832 06/24/99 007864 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNI SAFEKEEPING FEES/MAY 99
17833 06/24/99 000354 UNITED GREEN MARK
17834 06/24/99 003353 VISA
IRRIAGATION SUPPLIES/MAY 99
MEETING EXPENSES/JUNE 99
ORAL BOARD LUNCHES/MAY 99
MANAGEMENT RETREAT/MAY 99
17835 06/24/99 003739 WESTWOOD BUILDING SUPPL SONA TUBES/PIER & VALLEY
17836 06/24/99 008646 WIDMANN DEVELOPMENT INC WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND
17837 06/24/99 005290 WONDERLAND DEPOSIT REFUND
TOTAL CHECKS
16
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2101-4187
715-2101-4310
001-4601-4221
001-4204-4309
001-2101-4306
105-2601-4303
105-2601-4303
001-4202-4303
001-4202-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4101-5401
001-2125
715-2201-4310
715-3102-4310
715-1236
001-1141-4305
001-4202-4309
001-1201-4317
001-1203-4201
001-1203-4317
001-3104-4309
001-2110
001-2111
ITEM
AMOUNT
82.23
42.82
1,020.60
157.36
94.90
8,687.53
10.50
12.96
145.21
36.00
36.00
324.74
1,053.52
433.45
120.02
40.15
208.33
243.29
68.78
91.57
3,825.65
351.90
1,600.00
500.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
82.23
42.82
1,020.60
252.26
8,856.20
72.00
324.74
1,053.52
593.62
208.33
243.29
3,986.00
351.90
1,600.00
500.00
221,375.23
VOUCHRE2
06/24/99 17:31
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND
110 PARKING FUND
121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND
126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND
153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF)
160 SEWER FUND
301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
705 INSURANCE FUND
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
TOTAL
70,753.47
12,448.05
1,124.73
9,147.07
84,980.00
2,630.52
154.04
11,230.00
23,491.72
5,415.63
221,375.23
t9
PAGE 7
• •
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
07/01/99 09:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
17838 07/01/99 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 001-1103 372,020.73
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 105-1103 8,157.68
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 109-1103 871.61
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 110-1103 32,314.02
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 117-1103 716.76
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 140-1103 259.42
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 145-1103 1,425.68
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 146-1103 74.33
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 152-1103 40.73
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 160-1103 8,548.74
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 705-1103 2,618.74
PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-99 715-1103 3,794.30 430,842.74
TOTAL CHECKS 430,842.74
av
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 09:55
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 372,020.73
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 8,157.68
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 871.61
110 PARKING FUND 32,314.02
117 AB939 FUND 716.76
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 259.42
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,425.68
146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 74.33
152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 40.73
160 SEWER FUND 8,548.74
705 INSURANCE FUND 2,618.74
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,794.30
TOTAL 430,842.74
al
PAGE 2
I a
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
07/01/99 17:48 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
---> VOID CHECKS
CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS
017896
017962
VOID
VOID
2.2 -
PAGE 1
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
17839 07/01/99 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS
17840 07/01/99 006290 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES
17841 07/01/99 009585 DIANA ALBERGATE
17842 07/01/99 009571 MIRIAM ALERIO-WOLSKI
17843 07/01/99 006421 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT
17844 07/01/99 009566 CYNTHIA ANN ALLEN
17845 07/01/99 009567 ROBERT ALLEN
17846 07/01/99 005628 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
17847 07/01/99 009554 ANITA ARMEN
17848 07/01/99 009575 SHARON ATKINS
17849 07/01/99 003462 PRISCILLA BACON ATWELL
17850 07/01/99 009584 CLAIRE AUKERMAN
17851 07/01/99 008630 AVIS
17852 07/01/99 007286 DOROTHY BARNETT
17853 07/01/99 009537 SIDNEY BARTH
17854 07/01/99 009549 ROBERT BERGSTROM
17855 07/01/99 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS
17856 07/01/99 003190 BLUEPRINT SERVICE & SUP
17857 07/01/99 007941 BROOKS SPECIALTY SERVIC
17858 07/01/99 009572 ELOISE BUTLER
17859 07/01/99 009558 DENIS CAHALL
17860 07/01/99 005631 CALIFORNIA CHARTER/K-T
17861 07/01/99 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TWO WAY RADIO MAINT/JUNE 99
TWO WAY RADIO MAINT/JUNE 99
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/JUNE 99
OXYGEN TANK RENTAL/JUNE 99
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
LADDER REPAIRS/JUNE 99
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
MEMBERSHIP DUES/BLUMENFELD
CITATION REFUND
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
CITATION REFUND
ELECTION SERVICES
CITATION & COURT FEE REFUND
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
ASPHALT PURCHASE/JUNE 99
EMULSION PURCHASE/JUNE 99
ASPHALT PURCHASE/JUNE 99
ASPHALT PURCHASE/JUNE 99
ZONING MAPS/6/99
HEATER REPAIRS/COMM CENTER
ELECTION SERVICES
CITATION REFUND
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2101-4201
001-2101-4201
001-2201-4201
001-2201-4309
001-3904
001-3904
001-2201-4309
001-3904
001-3904
001-4101-4315
110-3302
001-3904
001-3904
001-3904
110-3302
001-3904
110-3302
105-3105
001-3104-4309
001-3104-4309
001-3104-4309
001-3104-4309
001-1208-4305
001-4204-4201
001-3904
110-3302
TRANSPORTATION/EXCURSION 6/12 145-3409-4201
EXTRA WORK/APRIL 99
DOWNTOWN LOT CLEANING/MAY 99
001-3104-4201
109-3301-4201
ITEM
AMOUNT
163.50
1,398.55
227.10
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,789.15
155.88 155.88
80.00 80.00
45.00 45.00
75.98 75.98
45.00 45.00
80.00 80.00
232.00 232.00
5.00 5.00
45.00 45.00
70.00 70.00
70.00 70.00
20.00 20.00
80.00 80.00
45.00 45.00
24.61 24.61
124.88
81.19
46.37
63.65 316.09
21.65 21.65
185.00 185.00
70.00 70.00
10.00 10.00
532.29 532.29
1,180.00
5,900.00
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
STREET SWEEPING/MAY 99
17862 07/01/99 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC WATER BILLING/GREENBELT
WATER BILLING/GREENBELT
17863 07/01/99 009561 CALWEST
17864 07/01/99 007611 CARMEN'S UNIFORM
17865 07/01/99 009555 CHRISTA CAVAN
17866 07/01/99 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET
17867 07/01/99 000978 GERALDINE CHRISTIE
17868 07/01/99 009569 BARBARA COGSWELL
17869 07/01/99 009588 BEN COGSWELL
17870 07/01/99 002173 NANCY COOK
17871 07/01/99 009580 RICHARD G. COOPER
17872 07/01/99 007700 CPRS
17873 07/01/99 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE
17874 07/01/99 008691 EARTHLINK NETWORK
PARTS FOR WINDMILL
PARTS FOR WINDMILL
UNIFORM PURCHASE/GAGLIA
CITATION REFUND
AUTO PART PURCHASE/JUNE 99
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/POST
ELECTION SERVICES
AGENCY MEMBERSHIP DUES
RECRUITMENT ADS/MAY 99
INTERNET ACCESS CONTRACT
INTERNET ACCESS CONTRACT
17875 07/01/99 009552 JEANETTE LYNN EBERHARDT CITATION REFUND
17876 07/01/99 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 99
17877 07/01/99 005676 FARO EDWARDS CLASS REFUND/SUMMER 99
17878 07/01/99 009589 EVIDENCE COLLECTION & P EVIDENCE SUPPLIES PURCHASE
EVIDENCE SUPPLIES PURCHASE
17879 07/01/99 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES/MAY 99
JANITORIAL SERVICES/MAY 99
JANITORIAL SERVICES/MAY 99
JANITORIAL SERVICES/MAY 99
JANITORIAL SERVICES/MAY 99
JANITORIAL SERVICES/MAY 99
JANITORIAL SERVICES/MAY 99
17880 07/01/99 004948 FASTSIGNS
BANNER/SUMMER CONCERT
17881 07/01/99 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 99
ay
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-3104-4201
001-4202-4303
001-4202-4303
001-2125
001-2125
001-2101-4187
110-3302
715-2101-4311
001-3904
001-3904
001-3904
001-2101-4312
001-3904
001-4601-4315
001-1203-4201
001-1206-4201
001-1206-4201
110-3302
715-3302-4311
001-2111
001-2101-4305
001-2101-4305
001-4204-4201
001-4204-4201
001-4204-4201
001-4204-4201
001-4204-4201
001-4204-4201
001-4204-4201
001-4601-4308
001-4101-4305
PAGE 3
ITEM CHECK
AMOUNT AMOUNT
12,200.00 19,280.00
1,997.16
1,232.91 3,230.07
162.38
162.38 324.76
250.38 250.38
10.00 10.00
394.56 394.56
70.00 70.00
80.00 80.00
70.00 70.00
37.96 37.96
45.00 45.00
165.00 165.00
519.30 519.30
495.00
495.00 990.00
20.00 20.00
6.33 6.33
72.00 72.00
135.00
285.25 420.25
1,200.00
750.00
950.00
290.00
365.00
3,390.00
325.00 7,270.00
726.36 726.36
19.00
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 99
EXPRESS MAIL/JUNE 99
EXPRESS MAIL/BALLOTS
17882 07/01/99 008931 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES,TR WORKER COMP CLAIMS/6/16-29/99
17883 07/01/99 009578 ANTHONY FORTUN
17884 07/01/99 009577 NANCY FORTUN
17885 07/01/99 009565 DORIS L. GARRETT
17886 07/01/99 009546 JOSEPH GENNARO
17887 07/01/99 002998 CHARLES GIARDINI
17888 07/01/99 009576 NANCY GIARDINI
17889 07/01/99 009556 EDWARD M GOLD
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
CITATION REFUND
17890 07/01/99 008071 GORDON H. CHONG & ASSOC PARKING STRUCTURE CONTRACT
17891 07/01/99 009538 CAMERON D. GORE
CITATION REFUND
17892 07/01/99 000059 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCR ANNUAL DUES/7/99-6/00
17893 07/01/99 009562 TRISH GREENSPON
17894 07/01/99 001340 GTE
RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
EQUIP MAINT/MAY 99
EQUIP MAINT/JUNE 99
17895 07/01/99 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
BILLING/JUNE 99
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE
a5
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-4202-4201
001-4202-4201
001-3904
705-1217-4324
001-3904
001-3904
001-3904
110-3302
001-3904
001-3904
110-3302
121-8624-4201
110-3302
001-1202-4315
001-2111
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-1206-4304
110-3302-4304
001-2101-4304
001-4204-4321
001-2201-4304
001-4601-4304
001-4202-4304
001-4201-4304
110-1204-4304
99 001-1101-4304
99 001-1121-4304
99 001-1131-4304
99 001-1132-4304
99 001-1141-4304
99 001-1201-4304
99 001-1202-4304
99 001-1203-4304
99 001-1206-4304
99 001-1208-4304
99 001-2101-4304
ITEM
AMOUNT
38.80
41.50
14.00
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
113.30
16,665.99 16,665.99
45.00 45.00
45.00 45.00
70.00 70.00
330.00 330.00
80.00 80.00
70.00 70.00
100.00 100.00
3,554.46 3,554.46
30.00 30.00
150.00 150.00
100.00 100.00
51.56
51.56
281.99
64.02
1,472.03
54.92
217.51
80.52
116.82
67.63
30.82
18.10
38.47
20.37
18.10
38.47
38.47
115.41
58.84
58.84
20.37
909.73
103.12
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
• •
17897 07/01/99 009544 KOJI HAMAGUCHI
17898 07/01/99 006093 OFFICER LANCE HEARD
17899 07/01/99 009579 B.E. HINES
17900 07/01/99 009570 RONALD C HOUSDEN
17901 07/01/99 009581 RUSS HUMPHREY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
TELEPHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
PHONE BILLING/JUNE 99
CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING
MEALS/POST CLASS
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
17902 07/01/99 008761 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS IN RAIN MASTER CONTROLLER
17903 07/01/99 001399 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS PAINT PURCHASE/JUNE 99
PAINT PURCHASE/JUNE 99
PAINT PURCHASE/JUNE 99
17904 07/01/99 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE
ELE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 99
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
17905 07/01/99 006140 INSTASHRED SECURITY SER DESTRUCTION SERVICE/MAY 99
17906 07/01/99 009509 IMOGENE JAMES
17907 07/01/99 009557 CHRISTINE JOYNER
17908 07/01/99 005358 KUSTOM SIGNALS
ELECTION SERVICES
CITATION REFUND
LASER GUN WITH BATTERY/CHARGER
a�
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2201-4304
110-1204-4304
110-3302-4304
001-4101-4304
001-4201-4304
001-4202-4304
001-4601-4304
001-2101-4304
110-3302
001-2101-4312
001-3904
001-3904
001-3904
001-4202-4309
001-4204-4309
001-4204-4309
001-4204-4309
001-4601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4204-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-2101-4201
001-3904
110-3302
715-2101-5403
ITEM
AMOUNT
135.78
135.78
133.52
115.41
115.41
233.09
58.84
219.50
20.00
140.00
80.00
70.00
70.00
3,013.68
88.17
88.17
88.17
286.44
5.84
5.84-
280.07
5.71
5.71-
214.66
4.38
4.38-
253.28
5.16
5.16-
253.28
5.16
5.16-
253.28
5.16
5.16-
56.00
45.00
10.00
1,438.49
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,868.76
20.00
140.00
80.00
70.00
70.00
3,013.68
264.51
1,541.01
56.00
45.00
10.00
1,438.49
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
17909 07/01/99 007859 L.A. CO METRO TRANS AUT BUS PASS SALES/JUNE 99 145-3403-4251 268.00 268.00
17910 07/01/99 009527 LA OUINTA
17911 07/01/99 009568 FRANKLIN S. LAWSON
17912 07/01/99 000167 LEARNED LUMBER
LODGING/LANCE HEARD
ELECTION SERVICES
LUMBER PURCHASE/JUNE 99
LUMBER PURCHASE/JUNE 99
LUMBER PURCHASE/JUNE 99
DRYWALL PURCHASE/JUNE 99
17913 07/01/99 009559 K LEE CITATION REFUND
17914 07/01/99 002175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE PROFESSIONAL FEES
17915 07/01/99 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI PRISONER LAB TEST
17916 07/01/99 008993 JEANNINE LOCHTENBERG CLASS REFUND/SUMMER 99
17917 07/01/99 008573 M.S.A.
17918 07/01/99 000605 MANHATTAN FORD
DUES/WILLIAMS & FLAHERTY
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
AUTO PART PURCHASE/MAY 99
17919 07/01/99 009551 HOMER &LINDA MCPHERSON 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
001-2101-4312 302.50
001-3904 70.00
001-4204-4309 44.77
001-4204-4309 6.93
001-4204-4309 35.20
001-4204-4309 32.25
110-3302 20.00
001-1203-4201 190.00
001-2101-4201 37.50
001-2111 25.00
001-4202-4315 70.00
715-3302-4311 6.13
715-2201-4311 113.79
715-3302-4311 82.22
715-3302-4311 6.21
715-2101-4311 9.83
105-3105 24.61
17920 07/01/99 001911 MEDICAL INSTITUTE MEDICAL EXAMS/MAY 99 001-1203-4320 104.00
17921 07/01/99 008975 MOBIL FLEET GAS CARD PURCHASE/MAY 99 715-2101-4310 195.38
17922 07/01/99 009560 AMELIA MONTES RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2111 310.00
17923 07/01/99 009573 S. DOREEN MYHERS ELECTION SERVICES 001-3904 80.00
17924 07/01/99 009494 NJP SPORTS, INC WIND SCREENS 001-4202-4201 960.00
17925 07/01/99 009547 CATHI NUNN CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302 40.00
17926 07/01/99 009582 WILLIAM R. OSWALD ELECTION SERVICES 001-3904 45.00
17927 07/01/99 009539 MICHAEL G. PAOLILLO CITATION REFUND 110-3302 10.00
17928 07/01/99 004573 FRANCES PARKER ELECTION SERVICES 001-3904 45.00
17929 07/01/99 009586 PHYLLIS PENNINGS ELECTION SERVICES 001-3904 45.00
17930 07/01/99 009328 PLANNING CONSULTANTS RE SEISMIC RETROFIT PLAN REVIEW 001-4201-4201 4,765.78
SEISMIC RETROFIT PLAN REVIEW 001-4201-4201 765.00
al
302.50
70.00
119.15
20.00
190.00
37.50
25.00
70.00
218.18
24.61
104.00
195.38
310.00
80.00
960.00
40.00
45.00
10.00
45.00
45.00
5,530.78
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
17931 07/01/99 003820 POSTMASTER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CITATION NOTICE POSTAGE/#460
17932 07/01/99 002190 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORP SUMMER CAMP/ID BRACELETS
17933 07/01/99 000296 THE PRINT NETWORK
PRINTING SERVICES/JUNE 99
17934 07/01/99 008364 PVP COMMUNICATIONS,INC. MICROPHONE REPAIRS
17935 07/01/99 009356 QUALITY SILKSCREEN
T-SHIRTS SILK SCREENED
17936 07/01/99 008871 LYN RILEY, EMS EDUCATIO MANDATED TRAINING PROGRAM/MAY
17937 07/01/99 009536 LISA ROBINETT
17938 07/01/99 009540 RYDER TRUCKS INC.
17939 07/01/99 009553 GEORGIA SALVA
CITATION REFUND
CITATION REFUND
CITATION REFUND
17940 07/01/99 004596 SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY C TUITION/HEARD
17941 07/01/99 006875 SAN PEDRO PENINSULA HOS ASSAULT VICTIM EXAM
17942 07/01/99 009548 SHANNON SANCHEZ
17943 07/01/99 007350 GEORGE C. SCHENCK
17944 07/01/99 009545 WILLIAM SHANNON
17945 07/01/99 009564 DORIS C. SHAW
17946 07/01/99 009550 NANCY SHERMAN
17947 07/01/99 006211 R.A. SMITH JR.
17948 07/01/99 008812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBL
17949 07/01/99 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
110-1204-4305
001-4601-4308
001-4601-4308
715-2101-4311
001-4601-4308
001-2201-4201
110-3302
110-3302
110-3302
001-2101-4312
001-2101-4201
CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
105-3105
CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302
ELECTION SERVICES
1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE
OIL WELL PUMPING & MAINT.
TELEPHONE SHARED LINE/98/99
ELECTRIC BILLING/JUNE 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/JUNE 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/JUNE 99
ELECTRIC BILLING/JUNE 99
17950 07/01/99 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLING/JUNE 99
GAS BILLING/JUNE 99
GAS BILLING/JUNE 99
17951 07/01/99 005195 STANDARD CONCRETE PRODU CONCRETE PURCHASE/JUNE 99
17952 07/01/99 009542 GEORGE STEELE
CITATION REFUND
17953 07/01/99 000985 RUTH STEFFEY CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING
2,8
001-3904
105-3105
001-1101-4201
001-2101-4304
105-2601-4303
105-2601-4303
105-2601-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-3104-4309
110-3302
110-3302
ITEM
AMOUNT
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,000.00 2,000.00
84.98 84.98
130.98 130.98
73.53 73.53
995.09 995.09
1,250.00 1,250.00
50.00 50.00
52.00 52.00
30.00 30.00
53.00 53.00
250.00 250.00
20.00 20.00
24.61 24.61
20.00 20.00
70.00 70.00
24.61 24.61
200.00 200.00
307.61 307.61
112.98
86.16
31.99
1,234.36
101.65
50.70
20.09
249.09
20.00
20.00
1,465.49
172.44
249.09
20.00
20.00
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
17954 07/01/99 008346 STRUCTURAL INSPECTION
17955 07/01/99 009541 SHELLEY TANNER
17956 07/01/99 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
INSPECTION/SKATE PARK
CITATION REFUND
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
HARDWARE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/MAY 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
PURCHASE/JUNE 99
OFFERED
TAKEN
17957 07/01/99 004768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE PRINTER MAINT/JULY 99
17958 07/01/99 004040 NAOMA VALDES
17959 07/01/99 009574 AUDRIE F. WING
17960 07/01/99 009587 JUDIANN WOO -SATO
REIMBURSEMENT/IEGAL AD
ELECTION SERVICES
ELECTION SERVICES
17961 07/01/99 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS PETTY CASH/INCREASE JULY 99
PETTY CASH REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
PETTY CASH REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
PETTY CASH REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
PETTY CASH REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
•
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
126-8526-4201
110-3302
001-3104-4309
001-2021
001-2022
160-3102-4309
001-2021
001-2022
105-2601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4202-4309
001-2021
001-2022
160-3102-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-3104-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4204-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-3104-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-3104-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-3104-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4202-4309
001-2021
001-2022
715-1206-4201
001-1121-4323
001-3904
001-3904
001-1020
001-1101-4305
001-4202-4309
001-4202-4317
001-4601-4317
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,956.50
10.00
90.58
10.06
10.06-
70.88
7.88
7.88-
60.11
6.68
6.68-
122.04
13.56
13.56-
230.53
25.61
25.61-
132.58
14.73
14.73-
104.76
11.64
11.64-
256.97
28.55
28.55-
256.97
28.55
28.55-
66.32
7.37
7.37-
30.31
3.37
3.37-
341.00
221.10
70.00
45.00
300.00
23.96
19.80
115.73
40.00
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,956.50
10.00
1,422.05
341.00
221.10
70.00
45.00
VOUCHRE2
07/01/99 17:48
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
• •
17963 07/01/99 009583 MARY ANNE WRIGHT
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
REIMBURS/5/24-6/23
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2101-4305
001-2101-4317
001-2101-4187
001-1203-4317
001-2101-4312
001-1201-4317
001-1203-4305
001-1202-4317
001-1203-4201
140-8622-4317
001-4201-4305
001-1121-4305
110-1204-4305
001-1203-4317
ELECTION SERVICES 001-3904
TOTAL CHECKS
30
ITEM
AMOUNT
61.28
12.33
40.00
24.00
29.25
20.00
37.76
20.00
42.59
19.84
43.73
42.62
31.38
8.75
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
933.02
80.00 80.00
92,406.14
•
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
07/01/99 17:48 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 56,862.98
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 389.68
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 5,900.00
110 PARKING FUND 3,287.52
121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 3,554.46
126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 1,956.50
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 19.84
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 800.29
160 SEWER FUND 301.41
705 INSURANCE FUND 16,665.99
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 2,667.47
TOTAL 92,406.14
31
PAGE 10
• •
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
07/06/99 08:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
17964 07/06/99 006483 IMAX THEATER SUMMER CAMP EXCURSION/7/7/99 001-4601-4201 315.00 315.00
TOTAL CHECKS 315.00
3 Z-.
VOUCHRE2
07/06/99 08:26
fa •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 315.00
TOTAL 315.00
33
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2
07/06/99 08:26
• •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED 0 PAGES / TO OnWINCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR o" 7 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
PAGE 3
•
July 8, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Hermosa Beach City Council
- 9 9
Regular Meeting of
July 13, 1999
1
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Award of contract of 300' noticing contracting service
Community Development Director
Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission
meeting of July 20, 1999
Final approval of ballot measures and other related issues concerning the general
municipal election, November, 1999.
Report on alternatives to herbicide use within the parks system.
Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and
Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of July 6, 1999
Monthly Activity Reports for June, 1999
Community Development Director
City Clerk
Public Works Director
Community Resources Director
All Departments
Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission
meeting of August 17, 1999
Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and
Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of August 3, 1999
Community Development Director
Community Resources Director
NO MEETING
lc
July 1, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members For the City Council Meeting
of the City Council of July 13, 1999
ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the following donations given to the
Community Resources department for the purpose shown:
1999 Sunset Concerts on the Beach
Hawthorne Savings - $10,000.00
Anheuser Busch - $5,000.00
Skate Board Track Grand Opening ceremonies
E.T. Surfboards - $300.00
Globe Shoes, LLC - $150.00
Surf Like A Girl - $100.00
Vanguard Surf Culture - $75.00
Background:
In June, 1999, the City received donations as shown above. The donations received
for the Skate Board Track Grand Opening will be appropriated to fiscal year 1998-
99, and the donations received for the 1999 Sunset Concerts on the Beach will be
appropriated to fiscal year 1999-00.
Respectfully submitted:
Valerie Mohler
Accounting Supervisor
h: user\valerie\donation.doc
Concur:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
Ste
City
rre I l
anager
ld
•
July 6, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
July 13, 1999
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL TO ACT
AS THE LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the South Bay Private
Industry Council (SBPIC) to act as the Local Workforce Investment Board and authorize the certification
of the current Private Industry Council (PIC) Board as the Workforce Investment Board (WIB).
BackEround:
The Job Training Partnership (JTPA) that was enacted by the United States Congress in 1982, is an
employment and training system to replace the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA).
On July 12, 1983, the cities of El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale,
Manhattan Beach, and Redondo Beach entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement that, in part,
created the South Bay Service Delivery Area (SBSDA) to be coincident with the boundaries of the cities
designated above to administer and deliver services pursuant to the Federal Job Training Partnership Act
(JTPA). The City of Inglewood was authorized to act as, and be responsible for, the general
administration and supervision of all funds received under the JTPA by all the participating cities and to
receive an administrative fee for such services.
Since 1983, SBPIC has successfully carried out the mandates of JTPA on behalf of the participating cities
in the South Bay.
On August 7, 1998, President Clinton signed the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA),
comprehensive reform legislation that supersedes the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and amends
the Wagner-Peyser Act. The WIA requires the establishment of Local Workforce Investment Boards.
The Department of Labor believes that changing from existing JTPA boards and councils to Local
Workforce Investment Boards is essential to the reforms of WIA. The Department encourages the
creation of new, fully functional boards as early as possible.
The WIA provides an option to use an existing entity to carry out the functions of the local boards.
Section 660.330 describes the requirements relating to the appointment of such an alternative entity. The
alternative entity must meet each of the four criteria set forth in the WIA Section 117 (i), including the
requirement that the alternative entity must have been established by December 13, 1997.
By resolution authorization, the City of Inglewood will request that the Governor designate the South Bay
Service Delivery Area as the Local Workforce Investment Area and certify the current PIC as the
Workforce Investment Board (WIB).
Respectfully submitted,
ephen R. Burrell
City Manager
le
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL TO ACT AS THE
LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD
WHEREAS, the cities of El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood,
Lawndale, Manhattan Beach, and Redondo Beach, (hereinafter "Participating Cities") have entered
into that certain Joint Powers Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") dated July 2, 1983, as
amended from time to time; and,
WHEREAS, said Agreement, in part, created the South Bay Private Industry Council
(hereinafter "PIC") in order to accomplish the mandates and goals of the federal Job Training
Partnership Act (hereinafter "JTPA"); and,
WHEREAS, the City of Inglewood was authorized to act as, and be responsible for, the
general administration and supervision of all funds received under the JTPA by all the Participating
Cities and to receive an administrative fee for such services; and,
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has created the Workforce Investment Act
(hereinafter "WIA") to replace the JTPA;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby resolves as
follows:
1. The City of Hermosa Beach hereby affirms that the Agreement forming the PIC
shall remain in effect under the WIA.
2. The PIC is authorized to act, pursuant to WIA §117(i), as the Local Workforce
Investment Board.
3. The City of Inglewood is authorized to continue to act as the Chief Elected Official
for the South Bay Service Delivery Area (the "Local Area").
4. As authorized by Section 4 of the Agreement, the membership of the PIC shall
consist of representatives of categories as set forth in the WIA.
5. The City of Inglewood is authorized to request that the Governor designate the
South Bay Service Delivery Area as the Local Workforce Investment Area and the City is further
-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
• •
authorized to submit all documents necessary for him to do so.
6. The City of Inglewood is authorized to apply to the Governor for certification as the
Local Workforce Investment Board and the City is authorized to submit all documents necessary
for him to do so.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of July, 1999.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
-2-
/10
•
June 29, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council July 13, 1999
CIP PROJECT NO. 97-525
COMMUNITY CENTER SKATE TRACK
ACCEPTANCE
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the work by Asan Construction Company, of
Calabasas, for CIP Project No. 97-525, Community Center Skate Track and authorize final
payment to the contractor (10% retained for 35 days following filing of Certificate of
Completion).
Background:
On January 26, 1999, City Council approved entering into an agreement with Asan Construction
Company, of Calabasas, to construct the Community Center Skate Track. The work included:
• Demolition of the existing tennis courts
• Site grading
• Installation of concrete flatwork and concrete skate track elements
• Installation of metalwork
• Installation of chainlink fencing
• Installation of asphalt concrete for new parking area
The contractor has completed the work to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer.
Analysis:
Acceptance of the work and final payment is in order. The original contract amount was
$115,280. Asan Construction Company completed the work for $113,533, saving the City
$1,747.
Fiscal Impact:
The project was completed $1,747 under budget.
Attachment: Project Location Map
if
• •
Resp ctfully submitted,
Patricia Kaldis
tf GE)
Harold C. Williams, P.E.
Associate Engineer Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
2
Concur:
Steph urrell
City Manager
F/B95/pwfiles/Acceptance NOC
Ncw Skateboard Park
/i
Existing Parking.
Skateboard'rark- Community Center
IIIIIIII
Ncw Tennis Courts
�O';OO+OO.pO.00000iO
is
os
—�''.
Existing Tennis Courts
l<
H 1u2wgJP \j
r
r 7- /.5 99
July 7, 1999
City Council Meeting
July 13, 1999
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR PUBLICATION OF LEGAL ADVERTISING
- LEGAL AND DISPLAY ADS
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council extend the current contract for City advertising
(legal and display ads) with the Easy Reader newspaper and approve the attached contract
for a term of three years.
Background:
The current advertising contract with the Easy Reader expired on June 30, 1999. It had
been extended for three years in 1996, based on the City Attorney's legal opinion that
since the Easy Reader is an adjudicated newspaper of general circulation published in the
city, the City may not use a newspaper published outside the city for its legal publications;
and, further, since the Easy Reader is the only newspaper of general circulation published
in the city, the City may contract for terms longer than one year.
The Easy Reader has agreed to an extension of contract for three years. The negotiated
rates are $9.50 per column inch for both legal and display ads and $9 per column inch for
subsequent insertions for the first_ year, and a five percent increase for each subsequent
year, with the understanding that the rate will at no time exceed that charged to Redondo
Beach, which goes out to bid annually. Our current and proposed contract rates with the
Easy Reader are shown below.
Noted:
Legal Rates
$ Increase
% Increase
Display Rates
$ Increase
% Increase
FY 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01 FY 01-02
$9.00 $9.50 $10.00 $10.50
$0.50 $ 0.50 $ 0.50
5.5 5.3 5.0
$9.90 $9.50 $10.00 $10.50
[$0.40] $ 0.50 $ 0.50
5.3 5.0
Stephen R. Burrell, C
anager
1
Elaine Doerfling, City Cl • k
ig
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
PUBLISHED CITY ADVERTISING - LEGAL AND DISPLAY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 13th day of July, 1999 by and
between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City," and the EASY
READER NEWSPAPER, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor."
ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT
Section 1.01. This agreement will become effective on July 1, 1999, and will continue in
effect to June 30, 2002, unless sooner terminated.
ARTICLE 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR
Section 2.01. Contractor agrees to perform the services specified in the "Description of
Services" attached to this agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein.
Section 2.02. Contractor agrees to furnish copy for proofing prior to publication, to
furnish five free copies of all newspapers containing advertising matter, and to furnish free all
affidavits of publications required by City showing the date of publication of such advertising
matter.
Section 2.03. All publications shall be published in the first publication of the paper
published after receipt of copy, and succeeding publications, unless otherwise directed.
Contractor must be responsible for the correct publication of all legal advertising and in case of
error or omission (which is not according to copy as furnished by City) shall republish said matter
affected thereby free of charge to City.
Section 2.04. A bond in the sum of $1,000 for the faithful performance of the contract
will be required from the Contractor. Said bond shall be subject to the approval of the City
Attorney as to form.
• •
ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION
Section 3.01. In consideration for the services to be performed by Contractor, City
agrees to pay Contractor according to the rates as described in Exhibit "A," but in no event shall
the rates charged to City exceed what Contractor is charging the City of Redondo Beach without
the prior approval of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Contractor shall be paid as soon as
possible after receipt of billing but in no event later than 30 days from said date.
ARTICLE 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
Section 4.01. This agreement shall continue in force until June 30, 2002 and shall
thereupon terminate.
Section 4.02. This agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of
the following events:
1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of either party;
2) Termination of City as a public entity; or
3) Assignment of this agreement by Contractor.
Section 4.03. Should Contractor default in the performance of this agreement or
materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this agreement by
giving written notification to Contractor. For the purpose of this section, material breach of
agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the failure to perform the services described in the
attached "Description of Services."
Section 4.04. Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set
forth in Exhibit "A" of this agreement on the date due, Contractor, at Contractor's option, may
terminate this agreement if the failure is not remedied by City within thirty (30) days from the date
payment is due.
2
0
ARTICLE 5. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 5.01. This agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written,
between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of services by Contractor for City and
contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of
such services in any manner whatsoever.
Section 5.02. If any provision in this agreement is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless
continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
Section 5.03. If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is
brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party will be
entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a
separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be
entitled.
Section 5.04. This agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the within Agreement at
Hermosa Beach, California, on the 13th day of July, 1999.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
By
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR:
City Attorney Easy Reader
3
EXHIBIT "A"
THREE-YEAR CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
PUBLISHED CITY ADVERTISING - LEGAL AND DISPLAY
The contractor will print and publish in the Easy Reader Newspaper, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Hermosa Beach, all publications of advertising of all kinds
required to be published by said City, for the three-year period of July 1, 1999 through June 30,
2002 at the following prices:
LEGAL ADS
From and including July 1, 1999 to and including June 30, 2000 at the following prices:
At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for the first insertion.
At the rate of $9.00 per column inch for each subsequent insertion.
From and including July 1, 2000 to and including June 30, 2001 at the following prices:
At the rate of $10.00 per column inch for the first insertion.
At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for each subsequent insertion.
From and including July 1, 2001 to and including June 30, 2002 at the following prices:
At the rate of $10.50 per column inch for the first insertion.
At the rate of $10.00 per column inch for each subsequent insertion.
With the understanding that at no time will the rates charged exceed those charged to the City of
Redondo Beach.
DISPLAY ADS
From and including July 1, 1999 to and including June 30, 2000 at the following prices:
At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for the first insertion.
At the rate of $9.00 per column inch for each subsequent insertion.
From and including July 1, 2000 to and including June 30, 2001 at the following prices:
At the rate of $10.00 per column inch for the first insertion.
At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for each subsequent insertion.
From and including July 1, 2001 to and including June 30, 2002 at the following prices:
At the rate of $10.50 per column inch for the first insertion.
At the rate of $10.00 per column inch for each subsequent insertion.
With the understanding that at no time will the rates charged exceed those charged to the City of
Redondo Beach.
Easy Reader
SOUTH BAY'S WEEKLY
PENINSULA EOPLE
p.
L O S VERDES PENINSULA MONTHLY
6/16/99
Elaine Doerfling
City Clerk
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254
South Bay Life
\011' Weekly Real Estate Guide
`I^ MON nt M.. en es. 8Iacb g•
Lit..,\>"/
Si
Dear Ms. Doerfling:
Re: City of Hermosa Beach legal advertising, July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2002
Easy Reader would like to submit the following bid for the City of Hermosa Beach legal
advertising for the period July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000.
1999/2000
1 -column legal ads
At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for the first insertion
At the rate of $9 per column inch for each subsequent insertion
Display legal ads
At the rate of $9.50 per column inch for the first insertion
At the rate of $9 per column inch for each subsequent insertion
2000 though 2002
All rates to increase five percent for the 2000/2001 fiscal year and an additional five
percent for the 2001/2002 fiscal year.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service.
Sincerely,
evin Cody
Publisher
P.O. Box 427 • 832 Hermosa Ave., Hermosa Beach, CA • 90254-0427 • (310) 372-4611 • Fax (310) 318-6292
EMail: easyreader@earthlink.net
•
647.)
July 6, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
The Hermosa Beach City Council July 13, 1999
PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182 MYRTLE AVENUE,
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 97-1 —
PROTEST HEARING AND TABULATION
OF THE BALLOTS
Purpose:
This report recommends that City Council hear and consider all comments and protests relating to
the proposed proceedings such as:
• The improvements proposed to be constructed and installed,
• The extent of the Assessment District,
• The estimate of the cost and expenses,
• The proposed Diagram of Assessment,
• To consider and finally determine whether the public interest and convenience require
the improvements,
• To award the construction improvement contract.
In addition, it is recommending the tabulation of the required ballots.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions entitled:
00/(g' )7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MAKING DETERMINATIONS, CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND
PROCEEDINGS, AND ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS, DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND
RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL FUND FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING, and
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
AWARDING PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182 MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS TO IRISH
CONSTRUCTION OF ROSEMEAD, CA.
4
• •
Background:
On May 11, 1999, the City Council held a Public Hearing in association with Utility
Undergrounding Assessment District No. 97-1. At the conclusion of the public hearing the City
Council adopted the following resolutions:
1. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND ORDERING THE FILING OF THE
BOUNDARY MAP FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE
AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING),
2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENT TO FORM AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ALL RELATING TO
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING),
3. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING REPORT AND THE FIXING TIME AND
PLACE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1
(MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING),
4. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA EMPLOYING FINANCIAL ADVISOR FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING) AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA
DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING),
5. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA EMPLOYING BOND COUNSEL FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT MO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING) AND
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA DRIVE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING).
In addition, City Council directed the City Manager to execute the agreements between the City,
the Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel.
Analysis:
During the public hearing, the City Council shall consider all evidence for and protests against the
proposed assessment and shall tabulate the ballots. The City Council shall not impose an
assessment if there is a majority protest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the
hearing, (1) there is a majority protest as set forth in Section 2930 of the Streets and Highways
Code (the 1931 Act) or (2) ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots
• •
submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted
according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
After the approval and confirmation of the District, the Assessment Diagram and Notice of
Assessment will be recorded at the County of Los Angeles. In addition, the Notice of Assessment
with instructions for payment will be mailed to each property owner.
Fiscal Impact:
All construction costs and incidental expenses such as engineering design, contract administration
and inspection, special bond counsel, bond servicing, and bond discount/special reserve fund will
be repaid by an assessment to the property owners within the District. The total amount to be
funded is $1,648,117.
Attachments: Exhibits
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Engineer's Report (Available for review in City Clerk's Office)
Plans and Specifications (Available for review in City Engineer's Office)
Assessment District Boundary Map (Available for Review in City Engineer's
Office)
Respectfully submitted,
l C� u)
Harold C. Williams, P.E.
Concur:
11//ii
Stepheft B ierf
Director of Public Works/City Engineer City ager
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
3
F/B95/pwfiles/ccitems/myrtle2
• •
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH MAKING DETERMINATIONS,
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS, AND
ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS,
DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND
RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL
FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE
AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING)
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore adopted Resolution No. (the "Resolution
of Intention") declaring its intention to order the acquisition and construction of the improvements
described in the Resolution of Intention (the "Improvements") and to form Assessment District No. 97-
1 (Myrtle Avenue Utility Undergrounding) (the "Assessment District") under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, "the
Act"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore approved a report prepared by Berryman &
Henigar (the "Assessment Engineer") under and pursuant to the Act and, in particular, Section 10204
of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Engineer's Report"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council fixed July 13, 1999, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the
regular meeting place of the City, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, as the time and place
of hearing protests and objections to the improvements proposed in the Engineer's Report to be made,
the extent of the Assessment District proposed to be created, and/or to the proposed assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused notice to be given of the passage of the Resolution of
Intention, the filing of the Engineer's Report and the time and place and purpose of said hearing, all as
required by the Act and by Section 53753(c) of the California Government Code and Article XITID,
Section 4 of the California Constitution ("Article )(IIID"); and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with this City Council an affidavit setting forth the time
and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the Act for mailing of said notice; and
• •
WHEREAS, a final Engineer's Report (the "Final Report") has been prepared setting forth the
Improvements to be acquired and constructed and the adjusted assessments, if any, and the Final
Report has been filed with the City Council and has been available for review by the property owners
within the proposed Assessment District; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 1999 at the time and place stated in the aforesaid notice, a hearing
was duly held by this City Council and, during the course of said hearing, the Final Report was duly
presented and considered, all written protests and objections received, if any, were duly presented,
read, heard and considered and all persons appearing at said hearing and desiring to be heard in the
matter of said Final Report were heard, and a full, fair and complete hearing has been conducted; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has received all ballots filed with the City Clerk prior to the
conclusion of the hearing, and the Assessment Engineer on behalf of the City Clerk has counted all
ballots for and against the formation of the Assessment District as provided in Article XII D; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has considered the assessment proposed in the Final Report and
the evidence presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, it appears that the City Treasurer is covered by a blanket fidelity bond covering
the faithful performance of the duties imposed by law in an amount deemed by this City Council to be
adequate; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 10424 of the California Streets and Highways
Code, funds collected by the City Treasurer pursuant to an assessment under the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 are required to be placed in a special improvement fund designated by the
name of the assessment proceeding;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach DOES HEREBY FIND,
DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER as follows:
SECTION 1. The public hearing referred to in the recitals hereof has been duly held, and
each and every step in the proceedings prior to and including the hearing has been duly and regularly
taken. This City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the Final Report, including the assessment
664949.1\22337.0008
-2-
and diagram and the maximum annual assessment for administrative expenses, the proceedings and all
matters relating thereto.
SECTION 2. The property within the Assessment District to be assessed as shown in the
Final Report will be benefited by the Improvements.
SECTION 3. This City Council overrules and denies any and all protests, objections and
appeals made in regard to these proceedings. The City Council further finds and determines that a
majority of the ballots received are in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots
were weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
SECTION 4. This City Council orders the proposed Improvements to be acquired and
constructed in accordance with the Final Report and these proceedings.
SECTION 5. The amount of the assessments shown in the Final Report and the proposed
maximum annual assessment per parcel for administrative expenses shown are confirmed and are fixed
in said amounts.
SECTION 6. The amounts to be assessed against the individual parcels shown on the
assessment diagram contained in the Final Report are hereby approved and confirmed; and the City
Council is authorized and directed to endorse the fact and date of such approval on the Final Report.
SECTION 7. The assessment diagram and assessment is to be placed on file in the office of
the Superintendent of Streets, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to record, or cause to be
recorded, the assessment diagram and assessment in the office of the County Recorder as required by
Sections 3114, 10401 and 10402 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and the City Clerk shall
record, or cause to be recorded, a Notice of Assessment as required by Section 3114 of said Code.
SECTION 8. The Superintendent of Streets is authorized and directed to give notice of the
recordation of the assessment, as provided in Section 10404 of said Code.
SECTION 9. The City Treasurer is designated to receive the assessments paid during the 30
day cash payment period which shall commence on the date of recording the assessment diagram with
the County Recorder.
664949.1\22337.0008
-3-
• •
SECTION 10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach
A 11'EST:
City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach
664949.1122337.0008 -4-
• S
I, , City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach
held on the day of , 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
AB SENT:
664949.1\22337.0008
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
-5-
I,
as follows:
ID •
CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby certify
The foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at an adjourned
meeting of the City Council of said City duly and regularly and legally held at the regular meeting place
of the City on July 13, 1999, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice
and at which a majority thereof were present.
At said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
I have carefully compared the same with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of
record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted
at said meeting and entered in said minutes.
Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and
same is now in full force and effect.
Dated: , 1999
(Seal)
664949.1\22337.0008
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
-6-
•
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
AWARDING PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182 MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
TO IRISH CONSTRICTION OF ROSEMEAD, CA
WHEREAS, this City Council on March 9, 1999 approved plans and
specifications for the construction of the improvements described in the
Resolution of Intention (the "Improvements") and to form Assessment District
No. 97-1 (Myrtle Avenue Utility Undergrounding) (the "Assessment District"),
and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 1999 four bids were received by the City Clerk as
follows:
Bidder's Name
Irish Construction
Elser Construction, Inc.
Herman Weissker, Inc.
Pima Corporation d.b.a.
Advanced Construction
; and
City
Rosemead, CA
Calimesa, CA
Bloomington, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Total Bid Amount
$ 866,278.00
$1,099,545.00
$1,274,845.00
$1,436,000.00
WHEREAS, this City Council determined that Irish Construction of
Rosemead, CA has submitted the lowest responsible bid of $866,278.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER as follows:
SECTION 1. This City Council awards Project No. CIP 97-182 for
Assessment District No. 97-1 (Myrtle Avenue Utility Undergrounding) to Irish
Construction of Rosemead, CA for $866,278.
SECTION 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest
the Construction Contract subject to the approval of the City Attorney.
SECTION 3. Direct the City Clerk to reject all other bids and release all
bid bonds after award by the City Council.
SECTION 4. Authorize Director of Public Works to issue change orders
as necessary within budget.
• •
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
The City of Hermosa Beach held on the day of July, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
F/b95/pwfiles/resos/res award 97-182
RESOLUTION NO.
•
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH MAKING DETERMINATIONS,
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS, AND
ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS,
DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND
RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL
FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE
AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING)
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore adopted Resolution No. (the "Resolution
of Intention") declaring its intention to order the acquisition and construction of the improvements
described in the Resolution of Intention (the "Improvements") and to form Assessment District No. 97-
1 (Myrtle Avenue Utility Undergrounding) (the "Assessment District") under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, "the
Act"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore approved a report prepared by Berryman &
Henigar (the "Assessment Engineer") under and pursuant to the Act and, in particular, Section 10204
of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Engineer's Report"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council fixed July 13, 1999, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the
regular meeting place of the City, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, as the time and place
of hearing protests and objections to the improvements proposed in the Engineer's Report to be made,
the extent of the Assessment District proposed to be created, and/or to the proposed assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused notice to be given of the passage of the Resolution of
Intention, the filing of the Engineer's Report and the time and place and purpose of said hearing, all as
required by the Act and by Section 53753(c) of the California Government Code and Article MID,
Section 4 of the California Constitution ("Article X D"); and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with this City Council an affidavit setting forth the time
and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the Act for mailing of said notice; and
664949.1\22337.0008
• •
WHEREAS, a final Engineer's Report (the "Final Report") has been prepared setting forth the
Improvements to be acquired and constructed and the adjusted assessments, if any, and the Final
Report has been filed with the City Council and has been available for review by the property owners
within the proposed Assessment District; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 1999 at the time and place stated in the aforesaid notice, a hearing
was duly held by this City Council and, during the course of said hearing, the Final Report was duly
presented and considered, all written protests and objections received, if any, were duly presented,
read, heard and considered and all persons appearing at said hearing and desiring to be heard in the
matter of said Final Report were heard, and a full, fair and complete hearing has been conducted; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has received all ballots filed with the City Clerk prior to the
conclusion of the hearing, and the Assessment Engineer on behalf of the City Clerk has counted all
ballots for and against the formation of the Assessment District as provided in Article XII D; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has considered the assessment proposed in the Final Report and
the evidence presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, it appears that the City Treasurer is covered by a blanket fidelity bond covering
the faithful performance of the duties imposed by law in an amount deemed by this City Council to be
adequate; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 10424 of the California Streets and Highways
Code, funds collected by the City Treasurer pursuant to an assessment under the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 are required to be placed in a special improvement fund designated by the
name of the assessment proceeding; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council an agreement with Southern
California Edison (the "Edison Agreement") meeting the requirements of Section 5896.9 of the Streets
and Highways Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach DOES HEREBY FIND,
DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER as follows:
664949. I\22337.0008
SECTION 1. The public hearing referred to in the recitals hereof has been duly held, and
each and every step in the proceedings prior to and including the hearing has been duly and regularly
taken. This City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the Final Report, including the assessment
and diagram and the maximum annual assessment for administrative expenses, the proceedings and all
matters relating thereto.
SECTION 2. The property within the Assessment District to be assessed as shown in the
Final Report will be benefited by the Improvements.
SECTION 3. This City Council overrules and denies any and all protests, objections and
appeals made in regard to these proceedings. The City Council further finds and determines that a
majority of the ballots received are in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots
were weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
SECTION 4. This City Council orders the proposed Improvements to be acquired and
constructed in accordance with the Final Report and these proceedings.
SECTION 5. The amount of the assessments shown in the Final Report and the proposed
maximum annual assessment per parcel for administrative expenses shown are confirmed and are fixed
in said amounts.
SECTION 6. The amounts to be assessed against the individual parcels shown on the
assessment diagram contained in the Final Report are hereby approved and confirmed; and the City
Council is authorized and directed to endorse the fact and date of such approval on the Final Report.
SECTION 7. The assessment diagram and assessment is to be placed on file in the office of
the Superintendent of Streets, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to record, or cause to be
recorded, the assessment diagram and assessment in the office of the County Recorder as required by
Sections 3114, 10401 and 10402 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and the City Clerk shall
record, or cause to be recorded, a Notice of Assessment as required by Section 3114 of said Code.
SECTION 8. The Superintendent of Streets is authorized and directed to give notice of the
recordation of the assessment, as provided in Section 10404 of said Code.
664949.1\22337.0008
• •
SECTION 9. The City Treasurer is designated to receive the assessments paid during the 30
day cash payment period which shall commence on the date of recording the assessment diagram with
the County Recorder.
SECTION 10. The Edison Agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized on
behalf of the City to execute the Edison Agreement.
SECTION 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach
664949.1\22337.0008
•
I, , City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach
held on the day of , 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
664949.1\22337.0008
• •
CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
I, , City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby certify
as follows:
The foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at an adjourned
meeting of the City Council of said City duly and regularly and legally held at the regular meeting place
of the City on July 13, 1999, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice
and at which a majority thereof were present.
At said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
I have carefully compared the same with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of
record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted
at said meeting and entered in said minutes.
Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and
same is now in full force and effect.
Dated: , 1999
(Seal)
664949.1\22337.0008
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
Elaine Doerfling
City Clerk of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dr. David L. Augenstein
339 Manhattan Ave.
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
(310) 376-5405
July 6,1999
RE: Proposed Underground Utility
District No. 97-1 (Myrtle Avenue)
As the owner of the property located at 2457 Manhattan Avenue in Hermosa Beach I am
writing to protest the proposed assessment for underground utilities in that neighborhood.
It is clear that the proposed underground utitlity conversion will be of great benefit to
property owners with ocean views. However, for my property I see virtually no benefit
being gained for what I consider to be a considerable sum of $8585.99 plus the costs to
link my property to the new lines. The utility poles on my street are all in the alley (Palm
Drive) and my view to the ocean is blocked by a 35' building. The aesthetic difference
between seeing the back of that builcling with utility lines or without is neghjible.
Regarding safety and reliability I can only recall one time in the five years I have owned
the property that the electricity went out and I cannot recall ever losing telephone service.
Thus, I do not see any need to spend money to move the lines underground to improve
safety and reliability.
In my view passage of this special assessment would result in taking money from my
pocket and other property owners with limited ocean views and subsidizing the substantial
property improvement of owners with ocean views. Please forward my objections to all
members of the Hermosa Beach Citygovernment who have a vote in this matter,
Sincerely,
Dr. David L. Augenstein
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
July 8, 1999
City of Hermosa Beach City Council
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear Council Members:
/\`S1iIr^
t7, f\11
J U L 0 8 1999
Robert J. Beste
249 26th Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
My wife and I are residents of 249 26th Street, and are opposed to the proposed
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 97-1. We have several concerns and
objections to issues regarding the establishment of the district that are not clearly explained
in the notification letter of May 25, 1999.
We are uncertain as to how the boundaries of this district were established. There does not
appear to be any reason for the given boundaries. For instance, why not include all
properties from Monterey Boulevard to the Hermosa/Manhattan border? We would like to
be discounted from the district entirely since it is not essential that our property remains in
the district and we will still have visible wires on much of our street.
We would like to know why the new infrastructure upgrades would be given to the utility
companies after completion. This $1.6 million asset should be property of the district for
lease to any company that wants to serve the area. In the era of deregulated power, there is
no reason that we should install infrastructure then turn it over to private companies.
Several potential costs have not been included in the notification letter. The cost to establish
the bonding may be as much as $1,500 per property when administrative costs are included.
Also, based on my recent experience in another city, the cost to underground each electrical
service is about $5,000. None of these figures include the additional costs to restore streets,
sidewalks, or curbs and gutters in the public right-of-way, or damage to retaining walls,
walks, and landscaping on private properties.
The letter did not mention any contribution by the City of Hermosa Beach to this project. It
seems unfair that other neighborhoods in the City have had this work paid for by the City
while we are asked to cover this cost for our neighborhood. This is a very expensive project
that, if approved, will needlessly force residents with low or fixed incomes to pay additional
money for essential services.
One of the major selling points of this proposal is to improve the aesthetics of the
neighborhood. Creating additional trench cuts in streets that are already in poor condition
will certainly not improve the aesthetics of the area.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerel
Robert J. Best ', P.
Carleen R. Beste
SUPPLEMENTAL A
INFORMATION gF
• •
Parker R. Herriott
224 24th Street
Hermosa Beach, Calif.90254
310-379-7196
July 9, 1999
Dear Unsuspecting Property Taxpayer in the Proposed Utility Underground District ,
I hope you realize that the proposed undergrounding of utilities by some of the
property owners in the Myrtle and Loma Underground Utility Assessment Districts is
just plain foolish, unnecessary and too costly.
Theproperty owners on a Southern portion of Beach Drive have already had their
utilities placed underground by Edison for free!
The property owners on a portion of Pier Avenue East of the Pier Plaza are in the
process of having their utilities underground by Edison for free!
The property owners on Pacific Coast Highway will be the next area to be
underground for free by Edison.
Why are those utilities being underground for free and if the proposed Myrtle and
Loma Utility Assessment District passes, those property owners will be charged an
exorbitant tax assessment? The pro-undergrounding property owners are just
foolishly and unnecessarily asking every property owner in their assessment district to
be taxed. This just doesn't make any sense, when they can and should ask the City
Council to get Edison to pay for the undergrounding in their districts, per Rule 20 of the
Public Utilities Commission, or they can just pay to have the poles and wires they want
underground by themselves if they have a problem waiting for Edison to do it for free!
The initial cost for most property owners in the proposed undergrounding districts will
be $8,601.55 for a single lot. If the property owners pay that money back on their
property tax bill over the next 20 years then they will have paid a total of $15,620.00,
because of the interest on the bond to pay the initial $8,601.55 per lot.
This means that the property taxpayer's will have to pay their yearly property taxes,
plus the additional increase for the assessment tax of $781.00 a year for 20 years,
which will cost $15,620.00 per lot. How outrageous and ridiculous!
The reason why Edison has paid and will continue to pay for the undergrounding for
certain areas is because of Public Utilities Commission Rule 20. and I quote it in part
as follows;
RULE 20
REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
A. SCE will, at its expense, replace its existing overhead electric facilities with
underground electric facilities along public streets and road, and on public lands and
• •
private property across which rights of -way satisfactory to SCE have been obtained by
SCE, provided that:
1. The governing body of the city or county in which such electric facilities are and
will be located has;
a. Determined, after consultation with SCE and after holding public hearing on
the subject, that such undergrounding is in the general public interest for one or more
of the following reasons:
(1) Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy
concentration of overhead electric facilities;..."
Edison owns the poles and wires now and they will own the wires after we pay to have
the wires etc., placed underground. Edison owns the electrical system. Why should
we have to pay for their equipment? We shouldn't!
Assessment Districts are the latest way to circumvent Prop. 13 and thwart the will of
the voters who voted for Prop. 13 back in 1978. If Prop. 13 did not pass when it did
most of us would not be living here today!
Voters can vote or change their votes by calling Mr. Steve Burrell our Hermosa Beach
City Manager, at 310-318-0216 and then they can get the needed information on how
to vote or change their votes. Or call me at 310-379-7196 for any help you may need.
Voting and vote changes can take place from now and up until a certain point during
the 7:30 PM public hearing on the matter in the City Council Chambers on 7-13-99.
Vote No on the proposed Utility Underground Assessment District. It is too costly and
Edison should have to pay for it anyway! Some property owners may have to sell their
property or have it auctioned off by the State, because of the tax assessment for the
utility underground district on their property tax bill. How tragic!
One person and his family I know will pay, if the new tax assessment district passes,
$3,124.00 a year for 4 separate lots for the next twenty years, which will add up to a
total of $62,480.00. Remember this will be a $62.480.00 increase to the present
property taxpayer's tax bill. How sad and outrageous!
Why did those people who want the poles and wires to be underground by the
proposed utility assessment districts ever move into the areas in the first place?
Nobody forced them to purchase their property but they are willing to force other
people to pay for the undergrounding of the poles and wires! How outrageous!
Save Prop 13 and our Homes -Vote No on the Utility Underground Tax Assessment!
Reectfully,
Parker R. Herriott
VOTE NO THE UTILITY UNDERGROUND SCHEME! AggST PROPERTY
OWNERS WI Y $8,601.55 PER LOT! IF YOU PAY THE RONEY BACK OVER 20
YEARS, THEN U WILL PAY $781.00 A YEAR AND THAT WILL ADD UP TO
$15,520.00 OVER YOUR PRESENT PROPERTY TAX BILL! MAKE EDISON PAY FOR
THE UNDERGROUNDING PER RULE 20 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION!
OTHER AREAS OF OUR CITY HAVE BEEN OR ARE BEING UNDERGROUND FOR
FREE, FOR INSTANCE, A PORTION OF BEACH DRIVE, A PORTION OF PIER
AVENUE AND ALL OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY! VOTE OR CHANGE YOUR VOTE
DURING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF 7-13-99 AT 7:30 P.M. THANK YOU!
101.1
—;747'7 randatIVP
•,„—p ', ` • ILLI
i .gb, F •_° ItMN
"As
I tit)
” .ri RAI
aft. At 114,1
Ida ' dA l' ILiI :'
Il(i1
113= ',�1
A 1EIS.1 At
•
ILN.1
--- , :� .. ---
Ili1 .�.li 1311.1 I ®1Cl 1/1►.� , rs
101.1 '4) I iA� I(iL► ®• ItlLI® ••� `' �� ;'
rit-m,9w1,
Ir.,it1
Irl
z ....�Fenssoliliir ` 1
A� I»,IfN., • �► 10:1 IIM,
aft
ts
da It Mil
•
•
111
iati
Y
:i ,. ` IIlt1
4141 I I:' :NSI 1 I.NI
..M..
i.O' r Air
'WI
aw
EQUALS $15,620.00 A LOT OF YOUR MONEY -
FOR EDISON EQUIPMENT!!!!
7--/3-��
Parker R. Herriott
224 24th Street
Hermosa Beach, Calif.90254
310-379-7196
Dear Hermosa Beach City Council, July 5, 1999
I hope you realize that the proposed undergrounding of utilities by some of the
property owners in the Myrtle and Loma Underground Utility Assessment Districts is
just plain foolish, unnecessary and too costly.
The property owners on a Southern portion of Beach Drive have already had their
utilities placed underground by Edison for free!
The property owners on a portion of Pier Avenue East of the Pier Plaza are in the
process of having their utilities underground by Edison for free!
The property owners on Pacific Coast Highway will be the next area to be
underground for free by Edison.
Why are those utilities being underground for free and if the proposed Myrtle and
Loma Utility Assessment District passes, those property owners will be charged an
exorbitant tax assessment? The pro undergrounding property owners are just
foolishly and unnecessarily asking every property owner in their assessment district to
be taxed. This just doesn't make any sense, when they can and should ask the City
Council to get Edison to pay for the undergrounding in their districts, per Rule 20 of the
Public Utilities Commission, or they can just pay to have the poles and wires they want
underground by themselves if they have a problem waiting for Edison to do it for free!
The initial cost for most property owners in the proposed undergrounding districts will
be $8,601.55 for a single lot. If the property owners pay that money back on their
property tax bill over the next 20 years then they will have paid a total of $15,620.00,
because of the interest on the bond to pay the initial $8,601.55 per lot.
This means that the property taxpayer's will have to pay their yearly property taxes,
plus the additional increase for the assessment tax of $781.00 a year for 20 years,
which will cost $15,620.00 per lot. How outrageous and ridiculous!
The reason why Edison has paid and will continue to pay for the undergrounding for
certain areas is because of Public Utilities Commission Rule 20. and I quote it in part
as follows;
RULE 20
REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES
A. SCE will, at its expense, replace its existing overhead electric facilities with
underground electric facilities along public streets and road, and on public lands and
private property across which rights of -way satisfactory to SCE have been obtained by
•
private property across which rights of -way satisfactory to SCE have been obtained by
SCE, provided that:
1. The governing body of the city or county in which such electric facilities are and
will be located has;
a. Determined, after consultation with SCE and after holding public hearing on
the subject, that such undergrounding is in the general public interest for one or more
of the following reasons:
(1) Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy
concentration of overhead electric facilities;..."
Edison owns the poles and wires now and they will own the wires after we pay to have
the wires etc., placed underground. Edison owns the electrical system. Why should
we have to pay for their equipment? We shouldn't!
Assessment Districts are the latest way to circumvent Prop. 13 and thwart the will of
the voters who voted for Prop. 13 back in 1978. If Prop. 13 did not pass when it did
most of us would not be living here today!
Voters can vote or change their votes by calling Mr. Steve Burrell our Hermosa Beach
City Manager, at 310-318-0216 and then they can get the needed information on how
to vote or change their votes. Or call me at 310-379-7196 for any help you may need.
Voting and vote changes can take place from now and up until a certain point during
the 7:30 PM public hearing on the matter in the City Council Chambers on 7-13-99.
Vote No on the proposed Utility Underground Assessment District. It is too costly and
Edison should have to pay for it anyway! Some property owners may have to sell their
property or have it auctioned off by the State, because of the tax assessment for the
utility underground district on their property tax bill. How tragic!
One person and his family I know will pay, if the new tax assessment district passes,
$3,124.00 a year for 4 separate lots for the next twenty years, which will add up to a
total of $62,480.00. Remember this will be a $62.480.00 increase to the present
property taxpayer's tax bill. How sad and outrageous!
Why did those people who want the poles and wires to be underground by the
proposed utility assessment districts ever move into the areas in the first place?
Nobody forced them to purchase their property but they are willing to force other
people to pay for the undergrounding of the poles and wires! How outrageous!
Save Prop 13 and our Homes -Vote No on the Utility Underground Tax Assessment!
Respectfully,
Parker R. Herriott
SAVE PROP 13 AND OUR HOMES!!
VOTE NO
ON THE UTILITY UNDERGROUND TAXES!!
COME TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TONIGHT ----JULY 13, AT 7:30 P.M.
YOU CAN VOTE
DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER!
YOU CAN EVEN CHANGE YOUR VOTE!
SEE YOU THERE NEIGHBORS AND PROPERTY TAXPAYERS!
THANK YOU!
RESPECTFULLY,
PARKER R. HERRIOTT
224 24TH STREET
HERMOSA BEACH, CA
310-379-7196
SAVE PROP 13 AND OUR HOMES! SAVE PROP13 AND OUR HOMES! a,
Assessment Districts are the latest way to circumvent Prop. 13 and thwart the will of
the voters who voted for Prop. 13 back in 1978. If Prop. 13 did not pass when it did
most of us would not be living here today!
Voters can vote or change their votes by calling Mr. Steve Burrell our Hermosa Beach
City Manager, at 310-318-0216 and then they can get the needed information on how
to vote or change their votes. Or call me at 310-379-7196 for any help you may need.
Voting and vote changes can take place from now and up until a certain point during
the 7:30 PM public hearing on the matter in the City Council Chambers on 7-13-99.
Vote No on the proposed Utility Underground Assessment District. It is too costly and
Edison should have to pay for it anyway! Some property owners may have to sell their
property or have it auctioned off by the State, because of the tax assessment for the
utility underground district on their property tax bill. How tragic!
1998-99 JOINT CONSOLIDATED DELINQUENT TAX BILL
CITIES, COUNTY, SCHOOLS AND ALL OTHER TAXING AGENCIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SECURED PROPERTY TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 1998 TO JUNE 30, 1999
SAMPLE NOTICE OF DELINQUENCY SAMPLE
MR.. AND MRS. HERMOSA BEACH VOTE NO!
HERMOSA BEACH CA 90254-2611
TAXES FOR THIS PROPERTY ARE DELINQUENT. THE TAX AMOUNT, PENALTIES AND COST ARE
PAST DUE. IF THE AMOUNT ON THIS NOTICE IS NOT PAID IN FULL BY JUNE 30, THE TAXES
WILL BECOME TAX -DEFAULTED ON JULY 1 AND SUBJECT TO A $15.00 FEE AND A 1 1/2
PERCENT PER MONTH REDEMPTION PENALTY ON THE ORIGINAL TAX AMOUNT. IF THE
PROPERTY IS "TAX -DEFAULTED" FOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS, THE PROPERTY IS DEEMED
"SUBJECT TO POWER TO SELL" AND MAY BE SOLD AT PUBLIC AUCTION.
C A \ /C DDC D 10A N in r11 it unn ACC n A niirn n 1 IrnnIn- -r nn A-rI f+.1 -1-1r- r --v- . ,.- ...
MARK J. SALADINO
TREASURER AND TAX COLLECTOR
225 N. HILL ST.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
) ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
OF HEARING AND NOTICE OF THE
ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION OF
INTENTION AND OF FILING OF MAP OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1
(MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING)
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1
(MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING)
The undersigned declares as follows:
I am now and at all times hereinafter mentioned was the duly chosen, qualified and acting
Assessment Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach;
On behalf of the City Clerk, I mailed, or caused to be mailed, postage prepaid, a notice of the
City Council adoption of the Resolution of Intention applicable to the above -captioned Assessment
District to all persons owning real property which is proposed to be assessed to pay any part of the
cost of the work described in said resolution, whose names and addresses appear on the last
equalized assessment roll used for the assessment and collection of general ad valorem taxes or on
the State Board of Equalization assessment roll at the addresses shown thereon, or as known to me;
Said mailing was completed prior to
, 1999, and a copy of said notice of
adoption as so mailed is attached hereto and madeai part hereof; and
On the original and one copy of the map of said Assessment District heretofore approved by
the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, I endorsed my certificate evidencing the date and
adoption of the resolution describing the proposed boundaries of said Assessment District and the
original of said map was filed in the office of the Superintendent of Streets and caused said copy to
be filed with the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles on , 1999.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
DATED: 5 36 , 1999
664945.1\22337.0008
Debby Cobb, BerrInan & Henigar, Assessment
Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach
• •
Script
1. Mayor announces: "The hour of the public hearing has arrived and this is the place
fixed for the 1913 Act Assessment Hearing of Protests, Objections or Appeals with
respect to the assessment and work under and pursuant to Resolution of Intention,
Resolution No.
lo
2. City Clerk presents Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Hearing filed with the City Clerk.
3. Mayor calls upon the Assessment Engineer to present the final 1913 Act Report and
to explain the proposed boundaries of the assessment district, the nature of the
work, a general statement that all property within the assessment district will be
benefited.
4. City Clerk to read or summarize the written protests received.
5. Mayor announces that the City Council will hear "any person or his or her
representative who has submitted a card requesting the opportunity to be heard to
protest the proceedings or who are in favor of the proceedings?" (Hear all persons
responding.)
6. Mayor calls upon the Assessment Engineer to make a statement regarding the
benefit of each property where the owner has made a protest if the Assessment
1
• r
Engineer has not responded to the protestants during the course of the hearing.
The Mayor shall ask if anyone who has not done so desires to submit his/her ballot
to the City Clerk.
7. If all persons have been heard and there are no other persons present indicating a
desire to be heard, the City Council may adjourn the hearing to another datO it he
City Council needs more information. If there are any changes in the proceedings
that would increase the assessment or add property to the assessment district, a
hearing must be held on those questions.
8. Before the conclusion of the hearing, the Assessment Engineer should inform the
City Council of the votes received in favor and against the assessment district. A
majority vote of those voting in favor of the assessment district (weighted vote) is
necessary to proceed with the assessment district. If there is no need for an
adjourned hearing, the City Council will then close the hearing by motion and voice
vote. If a majority vote has been received, the following actions should be taken:
Adopt the resolution confirming assessments and designating the City
Treasurer to collect assessments.
9. Award the construction contract to Irish Construction.
F/b95/pwfi I es/ccite ms/script
2
� �� 7 -ice -SS
7`` 99--6 623
July 6, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
The Hermosa Beach City Council July 13, 1999
PROJECT NO. CIP 97-183 LOMA DRIVE,
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 97-2 —
PROTEST HEARING AND TABULATION
OF THE BALLOTS
Purpose:
This report recommends that City Council hear and consider all comments and protests relating to
the proposed proceedings such as:
• The improvements proposed to be constructed and installed,
• The extent of the Assessment District,
• The estimate of the cost and expenses,
• The proposed Diagram of Assessment,
• To consider and finally determine whether the public interest and convenience require
the improvements,
• To award the construction improvement contract.
In addition, it is recommending the tabulation of the required ballots.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION OF TUE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MAKING DETERMINATIONS, CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND
PROCEEDINGS, AND ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS, DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND
RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL FUND FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA DRIVE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING, and
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
AWARDING PROJECT NO. CIP 97-183 LOMA DRIVE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS TO IRISH
CONSTRUCTION OF ROSEMEAD, CA.
• •
Background:
On May 11, 1999, the City Council held a Public Hearing in association with Utility
Undergrounding Assessment District No. 97-2. At the conclusion of the public hearing the City
Council adopted the following resolutions:
1. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND ORDERING THE FILING OF THE
BOUNDARY MAP FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA DRIVE
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING),
2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENT TO FORM AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ALL RELATING TO
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA DRIVE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING),
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING REPORT AND THE FIXING TIME AND
PLACE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2
(LOMA DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING),
4. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA EMPLOYING FINANCIAL ADVISOR FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING) AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA
DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING),
5. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA EMPLOYING BOND COUNSEL FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT MO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING) AND
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA DRIVE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING).
In addition, City Council directed the City Manager to execute the agreements between the City,
the Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel.
Analysis:
During the public hearing, the City Council shall consider all evidence for and protests against the
proposed assessment and shall tabulate the ballots. The City Council shall not impose an
assessment if there is a majority protest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the
hearing, (1) there is a majority protest as set forth in Section 2930 of the Streets and Highways
Code (the 1931 Act) or (2) ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots
submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted
according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
2
• •
After the approval and confirmation of the District, the Assessment Diagram and Notice of
Assessment will be recorded at the County of Los Angeles. In addition, the Notice of Assessment
with instructions for payment will be mailed to each property owner.
Fiscal Impact:
All construction costs and incidental expenses such as engineering design, contract administration
and inspection, special bond counsel, bond servicing, and bond discount/special reserve fund will
be repaid by an assessment to the property owners within the District. The total amount to be
funded is $1,809,384.
Attachments: Exhibits
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Engineer's Report (Available for review in City Clerk's Office)
Plans and Specifications (Available for review in City Engineer's Office)
Assessment District Boundary Map (Available for Review in City Engineer's
Office)
Respectfully submitted,
Concur:
/dc)zI
I
Harold C. Williams, P.E. Step urrell
Director of Public Works/City Engineer City ► anager
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
3
F/B95/pwfiles/ccitems/myrtle2
• •
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH MAKING DETERMINATIONS,
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS, AND
ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS,
DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND
RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL
FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA DRIVE
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING)
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore adopted Resolution No. (the "Resolution
of Intention") declaring its intention to order the acquisition and construction of the improvements
described in the Resolution of Intention (the "Improvements") and to form Assessment District No. 97-
2 (Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding) (the "Assessment District") under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, "the
Act"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore approved a report prepared by Berryman &
Henigar (the "Assessment Engineer") under and pursuant to the Act and, in particular, Section 10204
of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Engineer's Report"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council fixed July 13, 1999, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the
regular meeting place of the City, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, as the time and place
of hearing protests and objections to the improvements proposed in the Engineer's Report to be made,
the extent of the Assessment District proposed to be created, and/or to the proposed assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused notice to be given of the passage of the Resolution of
Intention, the filing of the Engineer's Report and the time and place and purpose of said hearing, all as
required by the Act and by Section 53753(c) of the California Government Code and Article XIIID,
Section 4 of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"); and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with this City Council an affidavit setting forth the time
and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the Act for mailing of said notice; and
666069.1\22337.0009
• •
WHEREAS, a final Engineer's Report (the "Final Report") has been prepared setting forth the
Improvements to be acquired and constructed and the adjusted assessments, if any, and the Final
Report has been filed with the City Council and has been available for review by the property owners
within the proposed Assessment District; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 1999 at the time and place stated in the aforesaid notice, a hearing
was duly held by this City Council and, during the course of said hearing, the Final Report was duly
presented and considered, all written protests and objections received, if any, were duly presented,
read, heard and considered and all persons appearing at said hearing and desiring to be heard in the
matter of said Final Report were heard, and a full, fair and complete hearing has been conducted; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has received all ballots filed with the City Clerk prior to the
conclusion of the hearing, and the Assessment Engineer on behalf of the City Clerk has counted all
ballots for and against the formation of the Assessment District as provided in Article XII D; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has considered the assessment proposed in the Final Report and
the evidence presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, it appears that the City Treasurer is covered by a blanket fidelity bond covering
the faithful performance of the duties imposed by law in an amount deemed by this City Council to be
adequate; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 10424 of the California Streets and Highways
Code, funds collected by the City Treasurer pursuant to an assessment under the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 are required to be placed in a special improvement fund designated by the
name of the assessment proceeding;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach DOES HEREBY FIND,
DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER as follows:
SECTION 1. The public hearing referred to in the recitals hereof has been duly held, and
each and every step in the proceedings prior to and including the hearing has been duly and regularly
taken. This City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the Final Report, including the assessment
666069.1\22337.0009
-2-
• •
and diagram and the maximum annual assessment for administrative expenses, the proceedings and all
matters relating thereto.
SECTION 2. The property within the Assessment District to be assessed as shown in the
Final Report will be benefited by the Improvements.
SECTION 3. This City Council overrules and denies any and all protests, objections and
appeals made in regard to these proceedings. The City Council further finds and determines that a
majority of the ballots received are in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots
were weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
SECTION 4. This City Council orders the proposed Improvements to be acquired and
constructed in accordance with the Final Report and these proceedings.
SECTION 5. The amount of the assessments shown in the Final Report and the proposed
maximum annual assessment per parcel for administrative expenses shown are confirmed and are fixed
in said amounts.
SECTION 6. The amounts to be assessed against the individual parcels shown on the
assessment diagram contained in the Final Report are hereby approved and confirmed; and the City
Council is authorized and directed to endorse the fact and date of such approval on the Final Report.
SECTION 7. The assessment diagram and assessment is to be placed on file in the office of
the Superintendent of Streets, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to record, or cause to be
recorded, the assessment diagram and assessment in the office of the County Recorder as required by
Sections 3114, 10401 and 10402 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and the City Clerk shall
record, or cause to be recorded, a Notice of Assessment as required by Section 3114 of said Code.
SECTION 8. The Superintendent of Streets is authorized and directed to give notice of the
recordation of the assessment, as provided in Section 10404 of said Code.
SECTION 9. The City Treasurer is designated to receive the assessments paid during the 30
day cash payment period which shall commence on the date of recording the assessment diagram with
the County Recorder.
666069.1\22337.0009
-3-
• .
SECTION 10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
A I hST:
City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach
666069.1\22337.0009
Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach
-4-
• •
I, , City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach
held on the day of , 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
AB SENT:
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
666069.1\22337.0009 -5-
I,
as follows:
• •
CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby certify
The foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at an adjourned
meeting of the City Council of said City duly and regularly and legally held at the regular meeting place
of the City on July 13, 1999, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice
and at which a majority thereof were present.
At said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
I have carefully compared the same with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of
record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted
at said meeting and entered in said minutes.
Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and
same is now in full force and effect.
Dated: , 1999
(Seal)
666069.1\22337.0009 -6-
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
• •
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
AWARDING PROJECT NO. CIP 97-183 LOMA DRIVE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
TO IRISH CONSTRICTION OF ROSEMEAD, CA
WHEREAS, this City Council on March 9, 1999 approved plans and
specifications for the construction of the improvements described in the
Resolution of Intention (the "Improvements") and to form Assessment District
No. 97-2 (Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding) (the "Assessment District"), and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 1999 four bids were received by the City Clerk as
follows:
Bidder's Name
Irish Construction
Elser Construction, Inc.
Herman Weissker, Inc.
Pima Corporation d.b.a.
Advanced Construction
; and
City
Rosemead, CA
Calimesa, CA
Bloomington, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Total Bid Amount
$ 981,219.00
$1,123,397.00
$1,254,614.00
$1,400,500.00
WHEREAS, this City Council determined that Irish Construction of
Rosemead, CA has submitted the lowest responsible bid of $981,219.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER as follows:
SECTION 1. This City Council awards Project No. CIP 97-183 for
Assessment District No. 97-2 (Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding) to Irish
Construction of Rosemead, CA for $981,219.
SECTION 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest
the Construction Contract subject to the approval of the City Attorney.
SECTION 3. Direct the City Clerk to reject all other bids and release all
bid bonds after award by the City Council.
SECTION 4. Authorize Director of Public Works to issue change orders
as necessary within budget.
• •
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
The City of Hermosa Beach held on the day of July, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
F/b95/pwfiles/resos/res award 97-183
i'f
a
RESOLUTION NO.
•
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH MAKING DETERMINATIONS,
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS, AND
ORDERING THE ACQUISITION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS,
DESIGNATING THE CITY TREASURER TO COLLECT AND
RECEIVE ASSESSMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL
FUND FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA DRIVE
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING)
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore adopted Resolution No. (the "Resolution
of Intention") declaring its intention to order the acquisition and construction of the improvements
described in the Resolution of Intention (the "Improvements") and to form Assessment District No. 97-
2 (Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding) (the "Assessment District") under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, "the
Act"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore approved a report prepared by Berryman &
Henigar (the "Assessment Engineer") under and pursuant to the Act and, in particular, Section 10204
of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Engineer's Report"); and
WHEREAS, this City Council fixed July 13, 1999, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the
regular meeting place of the City, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, Califomia, as the time and place
of hearing protests and objections to the improvements proposed in the Engineer's Report to be made,
the extent of the Assessment District proposed to be created, and/or to the proposed assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused notice to be given of the passage of the Resolution of
Intention, the filing of the Engineer's Report and the time and place and purpose of said hearing, all as
required by the Act and by Section 53753(c) of the California Government Code and Article XIIID,
Section 4 of the California Constitution ("Article XIIID"); and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with this City Council an affidavit setting forth the time
and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the Act for mailing of said notice; and
666069.1\22337.0009
•
WHEREAS, a final Engineer's Report (the "Final Report") has been prepared setting forth the
Improvements to be acquired and constructed and the adjusted assessments, if any, and the Final
Report has been filed with the City Council and has been available for review by the property owners
within the proposed Assessment District; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 1999 at the time and place stated in the aforesaid notice, a hearing
was duly held by this City Council and, during the course of said hearing, the Final Report was duly
presented and considered, all written protests and objections received, if any, were duly presented, .
read, heard and considered and all persons appearing at said hearing and desiring to be heard in the
matter of said Final Report were heard, and a full, fair and complete hearing has been conducted; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has received all ballots filed with the City Clerk prior to the
conclusion of the hearing, and the Assessment Engineer on behalf of the City Clerk has counted all
ballots for and against the formation of the Assessment District as provided in Article XIIID; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has considered the assessment proposed in the Final Report and
the evidence presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, it appears that the City Treasurer is covered by a blanket fidelity bond covering
the faithful performance of the duties imposed by law in an amount deemed by this City Council to be
adequate; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 10424 of the California Streets and Highways
Code, funds collected by the City Treasurer pursuant to an assessment under the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 are required to be placed in a special improvement fund designated by the
name of the assessment proceeding; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council an agreement with Southem
California Edison (the "Edison Agreement") meeting the requirements of Section 5896.9 of the Streets
and Highways Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach DOES HEREBY FIND,
DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER as follows:
666069.1\22337.0009
-2-
I
SECTION 1. The public hearing referred to in the recitals hereof has been duly held, and
each and every step in the proceedings prior to and including the hearing has been duly and regularly
taken. This City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the Final Report, including the assessment
and diagram and the maximum annual assessment for administrative expenses, the proceedings and all
matters relating thereto.
SECTION 2. The property within the Assessment District to be assessed as shown in the
Final Report will be benefited by the Improvements.
SECTION 3. This City Council overrules and denies any and all protests, objections and
appeals made in regard to these proceedings. The City Council further finds and determines that a
majority of the ballots received are in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots
were weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
SECTION 4. This City Council orders the proposed Improvements to be acquired and
constructed in accordance with the Final Report and these proceedings.
SECTION 5. The amount of the assessments shown in the Final Report and the proposed
maximum annual assessment per parcel for administrative expenses shown are confirmed and are fixed
in said amounts.
SECTION 6. The amounts to be assessed against the individual parcels shown on the
assessment diagram contained in the Final Report are hereby approved and confirmed; and the City
Council is authorized and directed to endorse the fact and date of such approval on the Final Report.
SECTION 7. The assessment diagram and assessment is to be placed on file irithe office of
the Superintendent of Streets, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to record, or cause to be
recorded, the assessment diagram and assessment in the office of the County Recorder as required by
Sections 3114, 10401 and 10402 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and the City Clerk shall
record, or cause to be recorded, a Notice of Assessment as required by Section 3114 of said Code.
SECTION 8. The Superintendent of Streets is authorized and directed to give notice of the
recordation of the assessment, as provided in Section 10404 of said Code.
666069.1\22337.0009
-3-
•
SECTION 9. The City Treasurer is designated to receive the assessments paid during the 30
day cash payment period which shall commence on the date of recording the assessment diagram with
the County Recorder.
SECTION 10. The Edison Agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized on
behalf of the City to execute the Edison Agreement.
SECTION 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
A 1'1EST:
City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach
666069.1\22337.0009
Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach
-4-
• •
I, , City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach
held on the _ day of , 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
666069.1\22337.0009
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
-5-
I, .
as follows:
• •
CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby certify
The foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at an adjoumed
meeting of the City Council of said City duly and regularly and legally held at the regular meeting place
of the City on July 13, 1999, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice
and at which a majority thereof were present.
At said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
I have carefully compared the same .with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of
record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted
at said meeting and entered in said minutes.
:Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and
same is now in full force and effect.
Dated: , 1999
(Seal)
666069.1\22337.0009
City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach
-6-
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
OF HEARING AND NOTICE OF THE
ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION OF
INTENTION AND OF FILING OF MAP OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (LOMA
DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING)
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-2
(LOMA DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING)
The undersigned declares as follows:
I am now and at all times hereinafter mentioned was the duly chosen, qualified and acting
Assessment Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach;
On behalf of the City Clerk, I mailed, or caused to be mailed, postage prepaid, a notice of the
City Council adoption of the Resolution of Intention applicable to the above -captioned Assessment
District to all persons owning real property which is proposed to be assessed to pay any part of the
cost of the work described in said resolution, whose names and addresses appear on the last
equalized assessment roll used for the assessment and collection of general ad valorem taxes or on
the State Board of Equalization assessment roll at the addresses shown thereon, or as known to me;
Said mailing was completed prior to 7 , 1999, and a copy of said notice of
adoption as so mailed is attached hereto and ma a part hereof; and
On the original and one copy of the map of said Assessment District heretofore approved by
the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, I endorsed my certificate evidencing the date and
adoption of the resolution describing the proposed boundaries of said Assessment District and the
original of said map was filed in the office of the Superintendent of Streets and caused said copy to
be filed with the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles on , 1999.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
DATED: 5 J 3 6 , 1999
666072.1\22337.0009
Debby Cobb erryman & Henigar, Assessment
Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach
1
ISSUES OVER UNDERGROUNDING OF THE
LOMA DRIVE UTILITY PROJECT.
The weighting of the Aesthetic View Benefit Factor.
The cost sharing should be based on the benefit derived from enhanced views of
undergrounded utilities. That is what the aesthetic view benefit factor should be but
in reality is not.
The preliminary engineer's report, dated May 11, 1999, bases this factor on allowable
dwelling units not on enhanced views at all. In the beach area, real estate prices are
primarily based on views of the ocean. Those properties on Monterey Blvd. have the
utility poles behind their property, which do not interfere with these views at all.
Please remember that is why the property owners on Monterey paid a premium to
purchase their properties. Granted there is a benefit while looking down the alley
behind the Monterey properties, but this is minimal in comparison to the lots on
Loma and Sunset that directly enhance their views with undergrounded utilities. Why
then do the Monterey properties average a much higher assessment while receiving
the least benefit?
Many of the central Loma properties receive view benefits from removal of poles
behind them, in front of them, and a newly paved street after the sewer project is
completed. Discounting the paved street, the enhanced benefits of those that have
poles removed in front of and behind the property should share a larger portion of
the cost. Why are a significant number of these properties actually being charged less
than those properties that receive half the benefit?
I believe the answer is intrinsic in the formula being used. Again, it is based on
allowable dwelling units not on view enhancements.
I request further discussion on this topic before the project begins.
•
DUE PROCESS
On a project that is funded by private funds, I believe it is important to have discussion
from all those who wish to. I feel that a very important step was missed.
The property owners received a letter postmarked May 25, 1999. This was the first time
notice was given as to the weighting factors and the assessment for that particular
property owner. Within the letter, it indicates that "the legal notice gives the time and
place for a public hearing on July 13, 1999" (at City Council Chambers). The letter also
indicates that June 16, 1999 "diagrams will be available and detailed questions may be
asked about the project."
Only after June 16 was it made apparent that significant issues needed further discussion.
This gives a very short timeframe for information to be collected for those wishing
further discussion on the project. In fact, I immediately requested materials after the June
meeting which finally arrived at my office just prior to July 1st
I received the Preliminary Engineer's Report, which indicated that "action rests with the
City Council after hearing all testimony and evidence at a public hearing."
Since testimony and evidence can only be given after information is received, I believe
we have not been given an opportunity to show the evidence in a timely manner so that
the property owners digest that information before they vote.
Remember, the property owners were asked to cast their vote as of May 25th with the
initial letter. They were asked to cast their vote without a "testimony and evidence public
hearing."
I request that due process be served and this hearing be given so that all sides can be
heard.
-L, oyLL,A, - Or -1 uJirT '
City Of Hermosa Beach - A.D. No. 97-2 (Loma Dr Utility Undergrounding)
Preliminary Engineer's Report -May 11, 1999 Page 12
,r (� /" 5LT -1 V c c7 il)
.111
If (,L0`' 5 vlr`r" T _"'' `EXHIBIT A
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
Since the improvements are to be funded by the levying of assessments, the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913" and Article XIIID of the State Constitution require that
assessments must be based on the estim teci special benefit that the properties receive
from the works of improvement. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4 of the State
Constitution requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the
proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Section 4 provides that only special
benefits are assessable and the local agency levying the assessment must separate the
general benefits from the special benefits. It also requires that publicly owned property
which specially benefit from the improvements be assessed. Neither the Act nor the State
Constitution specifies the method or formula that should be used to apportion the costs to
properties in any special assessment district proceedings.
The responsibility for recommending an apportionment of the costs to properties which
specially benefit from the improvements rests with thle Assessment Engineer, who is
appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct
apportionment of the assessment obligation. In order to apportion the assessments to each
parcel in direct proportion with the special benefit which it will receive from the
improvements, an analysis has been completed and is used as the basis for apportioning
costs to each property within the Assessment District.
Based upon an analysis of the special and direct benefit to be received by each parcel from
the construction of the works of improvement, the Assessment Engineer recommends the
apportionment of costs as outlined below. The final authority and action rests with _the City-
C_oynciL._afier_hearing all testimony and evidence presented--at—a public hearing and
tabulating the assessment ballots previously mailed to all record owners of property within
the Assessment District. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council must
make the_ final determination whether or not the assessment spread has been made in
-elect _proportion to the estimated special benefits received by each parcel within the
Assessment District. Ballot tabulation will be finalized at that time and, if a majority of the
ballots submitted, weighted by assessment amount, are in opposition to the Assessment
District, then the District must be abandoned. If this is not the case, then the City Council
may form the Assessment District and levy the special assessment against the parcels
t�ierein.
The following sections set forth the methodology used to apportion the costs of the
improvements to each parcel.
Special Benefit
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the properties receive a special and direct
benefit distinguished from general benefits conferred on real property located in the District
or to the public at large.
\\newbert\mf\#projects\hermosa\1. loma undergrounding\loma prel rept 4_99 doc
Berryman & Henigar
ri`
0101
<t$ -o\
o
r ! i Ci
��
�
� f
/, ad
/‘/eiz/?Ita-oal C?/ ?e. a -5-V
'yat it -e Z; ,
1 izzb it fr, /
' 0 G/7--
i)k)
0 -11,ftf.a7 -477/- e)„,;,,j,i4..9c02, Jaact, , 0., , ,
.../A., PO, i , ; , , z - Dee,ige,‘ 4 4 i - If 0 Y,,,,Z,,
• , J/e,-(x.a iii--,ecf,k--/‹_,
fe;&(, to--a-tJc., 4-itAz-ke,,w-e4-A-de-e-ei-cl. ,,i,z, w,,, --26,a-z, Y4-kt A.0.4 -e- /_4 77lei-pt iteet4,0e
-e,,,,L,
X999
Cip 51/
r•
1/0 .akLe_ae-azzAz?.-
,e4)-c;i1L frezey al5;frt--
7
d6, o/
j
aye .-,€
-L.-e.Ae_,yre.ii.e84. (04a
ieew-r%i/
.4.e)act/k Jo' InA
4ea4- ./ (
J/041-"-6.
1-o-4e7c .68,,ete
v
Jytk411_6,
7)itei-d
At-r4g-L
f
Lj
,eit-Ce;t
)L0 g4e-
An-01 ,42
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
Hermosa Beach City Council
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
�-�-
4-44
Regular Meeting of
July 13, 1999
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT NO. 99-4
PARKING PLAN NO. 99-2
53 PIER AVENUE
GARY VINCENT
TO ALLOW EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE
ALCOHOL AND CONTRIBUTION OF IN -LIEU PARKING PAYMENT TO
SATISFY PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
That the City Council:
1. Approve Conditional Use Permit Amendment No. 99-4 and Parking Plan No. 99-2 subject
to the Conditions of Approval in the attached resolution .
Background:
There are three discretionary permits and one encroachment permit connected to this project.
The restaurant was originally approved in January 13, 1998 under CUP Amendment No. 98-7 for
the site formerly known as Casablanca Restaurant. The restaurant expansion was approved on
May 17, 1999 under Parking Plan 99-2 and CUP Amendment 99-4. A separate approval for
outdoor dining was approved by Planning Commission under Parking Plan Amendment No. 99-3
on June 15, 1999 which allows the addition of 200 square feet of outdoor dining on a bridge
spanning the public right-of-way known as Loreto Plaza. The outdoor dining also requires
approval of an encroachment permit, and the City Council authorized submittal of an
encroachment permit application on May 11, 1999.
Parking Plan 99-2 and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 99-4 allows a 1,150 square foot
expansion to the former Casablanca Restaurant space within the contiguous building area to the
south. The Commission approved the project with in -lieu parking payment instead of providing
parking on-site pursuant to Section 17.44.190 of the Zone Code.
Appeal
The subject of the appeal is summarized in the appellant's letter and relates to the restaurant
expansion. The appellant notes four main areas of concern: It is not possible to contain the
alcohol problems in the downtown; there is a tremendous expansion of alcohol downtown
resulting in more auto trips; satellite parking was not posted as part of the project notice; and the
staff report does not refer to the elimination of private parking spaces connected to the building.
Regarding the first and second items in the appeal indicating there is "tremendous expansion" of
alcohol related use that cannot be "contained", staff has prepared a summary of the number of
restaurants serving alcohol uses along Pier Plaza and Hermosa Avenue which is the area of
highest concentration of such uses.' This tabulation indicates that since 1994 there have only
been five new alcohol related businesses established in this area. Pier Plaza has a total of 8
businesses (7 restaurants) and Hermosa Avenue has 11 businesses (9 restaurants).
I
• •
This is analogous to a "restaurant row" in most communities in terms of the number of restaurant
establishments and the number of blocks which accommodate these uses. The City has an
extremely small downtown and the zoning and General Plan "contain" these uses and no
property has been proposed for rezoning or a General Plan amendment to accommodate them.
The City has established through parking studies conducted for the downtown that up to 1/3 of
those arriving downtown come by means other than car (walk, ride bike, etc.) which addresses
the matter of use and trip generation.
Regarding the third item that the property proposed for satellite parking was not posted as part of
the notice for the project, the remote parking use was approved under separate Parking Plan
No. 98-2. This project was duly noticed and continued on three occasions to ensure public
participation at the hearings. The applicant is proposing to utilize the approved remote parking
area precisely as it was permitted in order to provide supplementary parking for downtown
businesses, not as required parking. Posting of the property for remote parking occurred with the
original hearing and is unnecessary for the proposed restaurant expansion project as it is not the
subject of this application and was previously approved.
Regarding the fourth item, that two parking spaces have not been considered in the tabulation of
parking credits for the property, these two spaces have been converted to two metered public
parking spaces and were never part of the complement of required parking for the property and
cannot be considered required or credited parking for the project.
Analysis:
Proposed Project
Loreto Plaza is comprised of two buildings located at 49 and 53 Pier Avenue connected by
pedestrian bridges and walkways spanning a pedestrian right-of-way which is City owned
property . The bridges are subject to a lease agreement between the building owner and the City
which has been in effect for over 21 years. In 1978, the previous restaurant operator had been
permitted to provide outdoor seating within the northerly bridge area under Planning
Commission Resolution No. 78-11 and in 1991 the restaurant operator was permitted to enclose
the bridge as restaurant floor 'area under CUP No. 90-35 . A lease to permit use of a proposed
deck extending over the right of way was not approved by City Council and this element of CUP
98-7 is no longer in effect.
The current plans call for a 1,150 square foot expansion within the contiguous building area to
the south of the existing restaurant utilizing a shared kitchen facility but no thru pedestrian
access between the restaurants. The current restaurant will retain the name of Fat Face Fenner's
Fishack and the proposed restaurant expansion will be called Fat Face Fenner's Falloon. The
plans show seating for 32 and a bar area with seating for 11. There is no live entertainment
proposed for the expansion, and any new live entertainment in this area would require a
Conditional Use Permit amendment. This proposed expansion is analogous to the Pointe 705/
Cafe Voila business operation where there is a common kitchen and separate dining areas with
different themes and names which was approved by the Planning Commission in 1998. The
proposed CUP Amendment to permit expansion of the restaurant is consistent with the General
Plan and zone, as the project is located within the downtown district along Pier Plaza. The
Parking Plan for the project has several policy issues which should be addressed. The applicant
has also proposed providing an outdoor dining area on the pedestrian bridge area over the public
right-of-way which was considered by the Planning Commission on June 15, 1999. The outdoor
dining use is subject to an encroachment permit over City owned property and the City Council
authorized submittal of an encroachment permit application.
• •
Calculation of Parking Requirement and Parking Credit for Previous Use
The applicant requested that Commission consider the previous banquet facility in calculating
the parking credit for the project. Loreto Plaza was originally constructed in 1975 when no
parking was required in the downtown parking district.' It is legally nonconforming to current
parking standards. Subsequent conversions to restaurant occupancy at Casablanca Restaurant
and Paradise Sushi were also permitted when no additional parking was required. In 1998, CUP
No. 98-7 the current restaurant was permitted with no additional parking required based upon a
parking credit for the previous use. Under Section 17.44.140 E. of the Zoning Ordinance:
When the use of an existing building or structure is changed to a more intense use with a higher
parking demand there shall be no additional parking requirement for sites in the downtown area
except to the extent there is a change offloor area to lot area ratio in excess of 1:1 . Otherwise,
the requirement for additional parking, shall be calculated as the difference between the
required parking as stated in this chapter for that particular use as compared to the requirements
for the existing or previous use which shall be met prior to occupying the building unless
otherwise specified in this chapter.
This method of calculating parking credits and debits is used throughout the City and the
Planning Commission has previously approved projects based upon the above provision to allow
parking credits to apply to the most intense previous use even when the use has been vacated for
several months or years. (Please refer to the attached table of parking credits.)
Applying the same principal to this expansion the parking requirement is calculated as follows:
Use
Previous restaurant banquet area
Current office space (where banquet area eliminated)*
Net Parking Required
Additional gross floor area for restaurant
Previous office space converted to restaurant
Net Parking Required
Total Parking Requirement
Square Footage Parking Requirement
624 sq. ft. 6 credited
624 sq. ft. 2 required
4 credited
1,150 sq. ft. 12 required
1,150 sq. ft. 5 credited
7 required
7 required - 4 credited = 3 required * *
Restaurant parked at 1:100 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA), Office parked at 1:250 sq. ft. of GFA
* The banquet area floor area of the previous restaurant space is currently used as office and the credit is calculated
as the difference from the previous use and the current use (624 sq. ft.@ 1 space per 250 sq. ft.GFA or 4 spaces).
** Total does not include request for outdoor dining under a separate application which results in 5 total required
based upon 200 sq. ft. of additional floor area.
The applicant requested that Commission consider the previous banquet facility in calculating
the parking credit and submitted a lease as evidence of the size and location of the banquet
facility which was a part of the former Casablanca Restaurant. Staff also noted the minutes of
the 1993 CUP approval for Casablanca Restaurant which refers to the former banquet room and
consulted with the prior Commission Chairperson involved with the original project approval.
Based upon this evidence and following review of the matter by the City Attorney, staff
recommended that the Commission approve the project subject to parking requirements of
Section 17.44.140 using the difference of the required parking for the previous use including the
banquet room. Staff has also provided a condition in the resolution requiring that the banquet
facility credit be restricted to the restaurant so that it cannot be double counted in the future.
The restaurant has proposed using remote parking after 6:00 p.m. as non -required, surplus
parking under Parking Plan No. 98-2 for the property at 200 Pier Avenue, and this parking is not
applied to the above calculation.2
• •
In Lieu Parking
The Zoning Ordinance provides the option to request accepting payment of in lieu parking fees
where parking requirements cannot be accommodated on site. Section 17.44.190 (3), provides
for contributions to a parking improvement fund in lieu of providing on-site parking. (Please
see applicant's letter.) The City Council recently approved continuation of the in -lieu program
based upon a new rate of $12,500 per required parking space. This new rate would apply to the
restaurant expansion.
Change of Use
The City has previously sought to maximize the amount of downtown office space in order to
increase the number of year-round daytime users in the downtown. Originally, Downtown
Enhancement District Funds were established to help fund the development of office projects by
allocating a portion of in lieu parking fees for such projects. Second story office space is being
replaced by a restaurant use and though the impact in terms of the amount of floor area is not
considerable, the loss of such space relative to the goal of ensuring daytime users in the
downtown is a policy issue to be considered.
417
rV'1'-
So B umenfel
rector
Community D velopment Department
Concur:
Ste . he ' R. urrell,
City Manager
•
Attachments:
1. Table of Parking Credits & Table of Alcohol Related Uses
2. Applicant's and appellant's correspondence
3. Off -Street Parking Requirements — Chapter 17.44
4. Resolution No. 99-27 and Parking Plan Resolution No. 98-38.
Notes:
L The Downtown Vehicle Parking District was exempt from parking requirements until adoption of the Local
Coastal Land Use Plan in 1981 when the current parking regulations took effect.
2. Remote Parking: The applicant is proposing to provide non -required, supplementary parking at an off-site
location at 200 Pier Avenue which is approximately 600 feet from the restaurant. The property owner of 200
Pier Avenue previously processed Parking Plan No. 98-2 in order to make surplus parking spaces available
during non -peak hours for other downtown businesses. (Please see Parking Plan No. 98-2 Resolution. The
Planning Commission approved Parking Plan No. 98-2 because it provided a means to maximize the supply of
downtown parking. Dual use or shared parking is a common method for cities to increase the supply of parking
without constructing additional parking facilities where nearby uses have varying peak parking demands. The
building at 200 Pier Avenue is primarily a daytime office use and the parking plan was intended to meet surplus
parking needs of downtown businesses after 6:00 p.m..
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
• •
RESOLUTION 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW THE
EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE
ALCOHOL AND TO ALLOW THE PAYMENT OF FEES IN -LIEU OF
PARKING (ALLOWING THE CHANGE OF USE OF 1150 SQUARE
FEET OF OFFICE TO RESTAURANT USE) AT 53 PIER AVENUE,
LOCATED IN THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE LORETO PLAZA
COMMERCIAL BUILDING, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 22, 23,
AND 24, BLOCK 13 HERMOSA BEACH TRACT
Section 1. An application was filed by Gary Vincent, owner of the business "Fat Face
Fenner's Fishack", seeking approval to expand an existing restaurant with on -sale alcohol. The
applicant is proposing to expand 1150 square feet by converting existing office space to
restaurant use within the building, requiring an amendment to the existing Conditional Use
Permit, and requiring a Parking Plan pursuant to Section 17.44.210 of the Zoning Ordinance to
allow the change of use with less than required parking based on a payment of fees in -lieu of
required parking (Section 17.44.190).
Section 2. The Planning Commission on May 17, 1999 conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application for amendment of a Conditional Use Permit and Parking
Plan, and based on the testimony and evidence, both written and oral, which was presented to
and considered by the Planning Commission, approved the requested amendment subject to
conditions as contained in P.C. Resolution 99-27.
Section 3. The City Council on July 7, 1999 conducted a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the subject amendments to
the Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan, at which testimony and evidence, both written and
oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission
Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the
following factual findings:
1. On January 13, 1998, The Planning Commission approved the applicant's request
for on -sale alcohol, live entertainment, and extended hours in conjunction with an existing
restaurant use located within the second floor of the Loreto Plaza commercial building
(previously "Casablanca" restaurant).
2. The applicant proposes to expand the restaurant by converting 1,150 square feet of
the contiguous building interior (existing office space) utilizing a shared kitchen with no through
pedestrian access.
3. The change of use to a more intense use requires additional parking pursuant to
Section 17.44.140(E) of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant proposes to contribute fees in -
lieu of parking pursuant to Section 17.44.190.
S
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
4. Given the existing lot size and building coverage it is not feasible to provid
additional off-street parking on site without a complete redevelopment of the site.
Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the
following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit and
Parking Plan:
1. The site is zoned C-2, and is suitable for the proposed use with the proposed
amendment;
2. The existing use with the proposed expansion is compatible with surrounding
commercial and residential uses.
3. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any
negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties.
4. Calculating the increased parking requirement based on the credit for a previous
restaurant banquet use converted to office/retail within the building, and pursuant 17.44.140 (E)
when the use of an existing building is changed to a more intense use, and applying a portion of
the credit to outdoor dining (2 parking spaces), results in a net additional off-street parking
requirement of 5 spaces for the proposed expansion.
5. The City Council, at its meeting of May 25, 1999, continued the parking in -lieu fee
program, and determined that the parking in -lieu fee is $12,500 per required parking space,
payable in lump sum prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
6. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303c of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the Planning
Commission approval the Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Plan, subject to the
following Conditions of Approval superseding the Conditions of Approval in P.C.
Resolution 99-27:
CONDITIONS OF THE PARKING PLAN:
1. The proposed expansion shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans.
Modifications to any of the plans shall be reviewed and may be approved by the
Community Development Director.
2. In order to compensate for required parking that cannot be provided on site, the
applicant shall contribute fees to the City's parking improvement fund in lieu of the
required three parking spaces, as set forth in Section 17.44.190 of the Zoning
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
• •
Ordinance, at the amount of $12,500 per required space as set forth by resolution of
the City Council. The payment of fees in -lieu of parking shall be made prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the expanded area of the restaurant_
3. The parking credit of four spaces for the building based on the conversion of a
former restaurant banquet room to retail/office use is specifically restricted to the
Parking Plan for the subject restaurant expansion.
CONDITIONS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE
ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT:
4. The hours for live entertainment within the northerly portion of the restaurant shall
be limited to the hours between 9:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. Monday through Friday,
and from 2:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. on Saturday, Sundays, and Federal and State
Holidays, Cinco De Mayo, and St. Patrick's day. Live entertainment shall not be
permitted in the expanded restaurant area at the south end of the building which is
the subject of this amendment.
5. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or
commercial establishments nearby.
6. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory
techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons
outside the business and in nearby public areas.
7. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the
City's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential
neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments.
8. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists, and may
authorize the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to
eliminate the problem, and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission,
which will automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the
Commission.
9. The exterior of all the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and
maintained free of graffiti at all times.
10. Any significant changes to the interior layout, which would alter the primary
function of the business as a restaurant, shall be subject to review and approval by
the Planning Commission.
11. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable
requirements of the Municipal Code.
7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
CONDITIONS RELATING TO LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AND NOISE:
12. If entertainment is to include amplified live entertainment, an acoustical study
shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and
shall be implemented in the building.
13. Management shall be responsible for maintaining music/entertainment volumes at
reasonable levels.
14. During any live entertainment and/or dancing, the exterior doors and windows
shall remain closed. The building shall be equipped with air conditioning to
ensure comfort of patrons during live entertainment, and compliance with this
condition.
15. All exterior glass windows or doors shall be equipped with double -pane glass or a
comparable substitute with equivalent sound dampening properties to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
16. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by
the city's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding
residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating
from the property shall be monitored to verify compliance with the noise
ordinance in response to any complaints.
Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the
owners of the property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the Community
Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of
the conditions of this grant.
The Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Plan shall be recorded, and proof of
recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department.
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is
found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable.
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees
from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to
attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable
time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any
claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate
fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
harmless the City.
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be
required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant.
Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
• `
participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve
the permittee of any obligation under this condition.
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any
development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any
development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions.
The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan and may
amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate
detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1999,
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
f:b95\cd\cc\pprs53.
ALL LOWER PIER PLAZA BUSINESSES
OCCUPANT IN 1994
ABC LICENSE
CURRENT OCCUPANT
CHANGE
DIANA'S
YES
HENNESSEY'S
-1*
HENNESSEY'S
YES
SAME
0
FISH MARKET
YES
SAME
0
END ZONE
YES
BEACH CLUB
0
T-SHIRT SHOP
NO
SAME
0
MARKET
YES
QUALITY THRIFT
-1
SUSHI SEI
YES
PATRICK MALLOY'S
0
COAST DRUG
NO
SANGRIA EXPANSION
0
PIER 52
YES
ALOHA SHARQUEZ
0
CLASSICO
YES
SANGRIA
0
ROBERTS LIQUOR
YES
SAME
0
BANK OF AMERICA
NO
SAME
0
MERMAID
YES
SAME
0
CANTINA REAL
YES
SAME
0
TACKLE SHOP
NO
SAME
0
SURF SHOP
NO
SAME
0
ICE CREAM SHOP
NO
SAME
0
JEWELRY STORE
NO
SAME
0
RETAIL
NO
DOWNTOWN BAKERY
0
IL BOCCACIO
YES
SAME
0
LOVY DOVY
NO
SAME
0
CASABLANCA
NO
FISHACK •
0
GYRE & GIMBLE
NO
SAME
0
PIER CONNECTION
NO
VACANT
0
PACIFIC SCREENPRINT
NO
SPYDER
0
FLEET FEET
NO
BREWSKI'S
+1
CITIBANK
NO
SAME
0
OVERALL INCREASE/DECREASE IN ABC LICENSES ON LOWER PIER AVENUE
-1
ALCOHOL RELATED BUSINESSES - HERMOSA AVENUE (10TH ST. - 14TH ST.)
GOLDEN LION LIQUOR
YES
ISLAND CHICKEN
-1
BEACH MARKET
NO
SAME (ADDED)
LICENSE)
+1
COMEDY & MAGIC CLUB
YES
SAME
0
OFFICE/RETAIL
NO
SUSHI SEI
+1
RETAIL
NO
ITALY'S LITTLE KITCHEN
+1
VIVA LA PASTA
YES
CLUB SUSHI
0
HARDWARE STORE
NO
SHARK'S COVE
+1
RETAIL
NO
CAFE BOOGALOO
+1
ECO CAFE
YES
DANO'S
0
STRAWBERRY PATCH
YES
TABASCO CHARLIE'S
0
BESTIES
YES
SAME
0
OFFICE RETAIL
YES
CALIFORNIA BEACH
+1
RETAIL/SANDWICH SHOP
NO
PAISANO'S PIZZA
+1
FAT FACE FENNER'S
YES
TBA
0
THAI RESTAURANT
YES
THAI DISHES
0
JAY'S MARKET
YES
SAME
0
RESTAURANT
YES
JOHNNIE'S
0
CAL BEACH
YES
IBIZI
0
OVERALL INCREASE/DECREASE IN ABC LICENSES ON HERMOSA AVENUE
+6
TOTAL NET INCREASE
+5
* Net loss of 1 license
f:\b95\cd\pierlics
Examples of Projects with Parking Requirement
Credited from Previous Use
Project /
month/year approved
Address
Area of
Expansion
and/or Change
of Use (in sq.ft.)
Required
Parking
Spaces
credited from
previous use
Notes
00: Sushi Mezzanine
Addition 2/96
1200
Hermosa
Ave.
360 exp
2800 change
28
Fredet"tor previo sly sated taurant
use IRE.01.....§Aosi and waiver based on no
increase in occupant load due to other
interior alterations
['he"Mix 3/97
117 Pier
Ave.
900 change
4
C recta ;for previcSus vacated re : e 1
!_,:e.a,ri Parking in -lieu fees paid by City for
5 added spaces required.
Hennessey's Tavern
Expansion and added
Roof Deck 4/96
8 Pier Ave.
1800 change
700 exp.
18
Credit for previous restaurant use
(Diana's); 5 spaces excepted per L.U.P.
amendment #6; and payment of in -lieu
fee for 2 spaces
Plaza Hermosa
Shopping Center
Convert retail to
restaurant; retail to
medical office 6/95
Pier /
P.C.H.
1725 (retail to
restaurant).
1690 (retail to
medical office)
10
1
Credit for comparable amount of
previous restaurant use converted to retail
at a different location in the Center
(Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza to Aaron
Bros.)
Paisano's Pizza 3/97
1132
Hermosa
Ave.
530 change
2
Credit for previous vacant retail use (2
spaces) a total of 3 additional required. 3
spaces waived based on lower demand
association with location in downtown
district
Espresso Wash
conversion of
Laundromat to coffee
house 1/98
509 Pier
Ave.
900 change
4
Credit for previous use (4 spaces) 5
added spaces required. 5 spaces waived
based on lower demand/shared use
characteristics of coffee house and
location
La Playita Patioj10/91
37 14th St.
700 change
300 exp
7
Creditfor previot s restaurantse vacated
or severall uu on r,7 a a '
-'`
Requirement for 3 added spaces for
expansion waived based on location near
the Strand/and downtown parking lots
Comedy and Mia i
1018
Hermosa
Ave.
1300 change
13
Expansion allowed based on "z' ' ' .of 1
spaces for previous Chinese Restaurant at
1014 Hermosa Avenue even though it
Cl lir I tsars expansion
into adjacent space to
South 9/90
had beenacate',,, or ser ' , yea rs
Buona Vita 5/94
439 Pier
Ave
1260 change
(780 retail to
restaurant)
8
Credits for previous restaurant (Gem
Cafe) 5 spaces which had been vacant
and credit for prior retail use (3 spaces),.
Requirement for 5 added spaces waived
based on downtown location.
Shark's Cove 11/94
1220
Hermosa
Ave
3300 change
13
Credit for previous hardware store use
(13 spaces) required additional 31 waived
based on much lower demand associated
with "billiard hall" use and location in
downtown district near newly expanded
public parking lot
ron Wprks$/ The sV;if d
1106
Hermosa
Ave
3200 change
13
7sedoon*credit fa. previous"re'1 ltiarlc,,§j
13'spaces),which hadlkieen vacated o
everal.y..Regairreutet t for;;15 add
s invedib ten of
e3 and.4locatio1.
1990 change from
vacant retail space to
fitness facility 8/90
/J
•
FAT FACE FENNER'S FALLOON, LTD.
FAT FACE FENNER'S FISHACK
53 PIER AVENUE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254
May 5, 1999
Sol Blumenfeld
Director
Community Development Department
Hermosa Beach
Subject: Proposed Restaurant Expansion — Fishack — 49-53 Pier Ave
Dear Sol,
In response to your December 14, 1998 letter and our recent conversations I offer the following
in support of our request to expand our existing restaurant into adjacent space on the 2nd floor of
53 Pier Ave.
Description of Project:
Our intent is to create additional seating for the Fishack by remodeling adjacent office space.
There will be no need to increase the kitchen for this project. The remodeled space
(approximately 1150 sq. ft.) will contain storage, handicapped accessible bathrooms for both
sexes and additional seating divided between table seating (approximately 32) and bar
(approximately 11).
Parking Requirements
In your December 14 letter you calculated that based on previous credits and increased
requirements due to change of use from office to restaurant space, 3 parking spaces would be
required. To satisfy not only this requirement and our request for outside dining, but to also
provide more parking for visitors coming to downtown Hermosa Beach, we have leased 21
parking spaces for 5 years from Warren Miller Properties at 200 Pier Ave (schedule attached).
We have engaged Ampco Parking to operate this lot from 6:15 PM until closing Monday through
Friday and from 9:00 AM until closing on Saturdays and Sundays. Ampco will ensure that all
city requirements are met and that the lot is controlled to provide that the maximum number of
spaces is available to help ease the City's parking shortage. Since the city has determined
through several studies that the parking shortage is predominately on weekends and at night, we
feel that our plan addresses these high impact times.
/�—
• •
Change of use
Although we are requesting a change of use the impact on the net amount of office space is
minimal since 624 sq. ft. of our original restaurant space was converted back to office space
resulting in only a net decrease in office space of approximately 500 sq. ft. Further, the 2
attorneys previously using the space moved into underutilized space in the existing building.
Additionally, our expansion will create 10- 15 new jobs and increase the sales tax base. We are
establishing ourselves as a restaurant that serves alcohol rather than a bar that serves some food.
We feel this is in keeping with the family atmosphere Pier Ave was developed to meet.
If there are further issues we need to address please call me at 379-5550. As always, thank you
for your continued support and guidance.
Sincerely,
onn J. Flatley
President
/3
•
•
SET FOR JLL.1 II) 1444
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
June 7, 1999
Hermosa Beach City Council
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Re: Gary Vincent, FFFFishack, 53 Pier Avenue
Councilmembers:
We wish to appeal the recent decision by the Planning
Commission issuing a CUP amendment and parking plan
allowing a 1150 sq. ft. expansion to the Gary
Vincent/FFFFishack premises at 53 Pier Avenue, for the
following reasons.
1. It's not possible to expand the alcohol uses on Pier
Avenue and still "contain" the alcohol problems there,
because patrons leaving Pier Avenue at closing time radiate
out into the area, and often are noisy or unruly.
Disturbance from those mobile patrons is a surprisingly
consistent theme in the letters that were written about
Scotty's, which is up on appeal and will be before you
later this month.
2. FFFF's satellite parking lot was not posted and the
neighborhood around it was not noticed that it could be the
permanent parking supply for a restaurant with an alcohol
use.
3. Through the use of credits for earlier intensive uses,
the parking requirement for the FFFF expansion was limited
to three spaces. However, the staff report did not discuss
the loss of the two private spaces, adjacent to parking lot
B, that formerly were utilized by the occupants of the
space that FFFF wishes to expand into.
• •
4. There's been a tremendous expansion in the availability
of liquor downtown.
a. The number of licenses, and the square footage of
licensed premises, has increased substantially. While.
a staff tabulation (part of the Scotty's staff report)
says there are only 4 new licenses downtown, the
actual number is twice that when Hamilton Gregg
(becoming a brewpub, with both on -sale and off -sale
privileges), Seafood Grotto, Paisano's and Einstein's
are included. Everyone on lower Pier has added
outdoor dining. And some places (Hennessey's,
Sangria) have doubled the size of their permanent
structure without that adding to the license count.
One place, Einstein's, while it has only one license,
adds as much square footage as three or four average -
sized premises.
b. Looking at only the number of licenses, and the
square footage, is not the full measure of the change
downtown. The intensity of use of the available
square footage has increased, with many places
offering longer and later hours, dancing, and live
entertainment.
5: Some city council members have mentioned recently that
they think that there are enough bars downtown. Now is the
time to draw the line - otherwise, will the City give
liquor licenses to all the other non -restaurant space
downtown (with the now -empty Pier Connection being next),
and to the many restaurants (NY Deli, Wings West, Zeppy's,
Good Stuff, Big Mike's, Backburner, Tom Boy's, Pedone's,
New Orleans, Island Chicken, Sandwich Joint, Hermosa Pizza,
Rinaldi's West, Java Man, Downtown Bakery) that don't yet
have a license? If you do, that will forever foreclose the
possibility of obtaining the diversity called for by the
city's General Plan.
6. The restaurant industry downtown is a smokestack
industry, as it requires high numbers of noisy and air -
polluting car trips through Hermosa. The fact that the
restaurant industry requires more car trips than does
retail business is reflected in the City's higher parking
requirements for restaurant uses. Any expansion of the
�S
• I
square footage devoted to restaurants, such as is envisaged
here, will increase the noise and air pollution coming from
the cars,lis not consistent with the General Plan.
oth
Sincerely,
James Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Parker Herriott, 224 -24th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Chapter 17.44
OFF-STREET PARKING
Sections:
17.44.010
17.44.020
17.44.030
17.44.040
17.44.050
17.44.060
17.44.070
17.44.080
17.44.090
17.44.100
17.44.110
17.44.120
17.44.130
17.44.140
17.44.150
17.44.160
17.44.170
17.44.180
17.44.190
17.44.200
17.44.210
17.44.220
Definitions.
Off-street parking --Residential
uses.
Off-street parking --Commercial
and business uses.
Parking requirements for the
downtown area.
Unlawful to reduce available
parking.
Common parking facilities.
Off-street parking --Mixed uses.
Uses not otherwise specified.
Off-street parking location.
Size of spaces.
Tandem parking and entry -way
standards for residential
parking.
Driveways.
Turning radii, stall width and
aisle width.
Requirements for new and
existing construction.
Underground parking facilities.
Required improvement and
maintenance of parking area.
Parking area in R-3 or R -P
zones.
Resulting fractions.
Off-street parking within
vehicle parking districts.
Assignment of off-street
residential parking spaces.
Parking plans.
Consolidated off-street parking.
17.44.010 Definitions.
As used in this chapter.
17.44.010
"Entrance -way" means an opening or passageway
to a building or structure which permits pedestrian
or vehicular access to such building or structure.
"Gross floor area" means the total area occupied
by a building or structure, excepting therefrom only
the area of any inner open courts, corridors, open
balconies (except when utilized, e.g. restaurant
seating or similar usage), and open stairways. Such
total area shall be calculated by measuring along the
outside dimensions of .the exterior surfaces of such
building or structure.
"Major city street" means all public rights-of-way
designated in the circulation element of the general
plan as a primary, or secondary arterials or as
collectors.
"Off-street parking" means parking upon private
property as accessory to other permitted !and uses,
and shall not include publicly owned parking.
"Tandem parking" means one automobile parked
after or behind another in a lengthwise fashion. In
this title, tandem parking is limited to not more than
one automobile behind another.
"Underground parking facilities" means a
basement equipped, designed, used or intended to be
used for parking automobiles'(Prior code Appx. A,
§ 1150)
17.44.020 Off-street parking—Residential
uses.
The aggregate amount of off-street automobile
parking spaces provided in connection with each of
the following uses shall be not less than the
following:
(17.44) 1
�7
Use
A. One -family
dwelling.
B. Duplex or two-
family dwelling.
Parking Requirement
Two off-street parking
spaces plus one guest
space.
Two off-street parking
spaces for each unit plus
one guest space. One
additional space of on-site
guest parking shall be
provided for each on -street
e
BIICI(GIWIINII MATER/AL
17.44.020
C. Multiple
dwellings
(three or
more units).
D.
Detached
servants' quarters
or guesthouses.
(Prior code Appx. A, § 1151)
space lost because of new
curbcuts and/or driveways.
Two off-street spaces for
each dwelling unit plus
one guest space for each
two dwelling units. One
additional space of on-site
guest parking shall be
provided for each on -street
space lost because of new
curbcuts and/or driveways.
One space.
17.44.030 Off-street parking --Commercial
and business uses.
Required Number of Spaces by Use. The
aggregate amount of off-street automobile parking
spaces provided for various uses shall not be less
than the following:
A. Auditoriums for churches, theater,
entertainment, sports and other places and rooms of
public assembly for more than twenty (20) persons:
one space. for each five seats, permanent or
removable, or one space for each fifty (50) square
feet of gross floor area in the auditorium, whichever
is greater.
B. Automobile or boat sales: one space for each
one thousand (1,000) square feet of site area.
C. Bowling alleys: five spaces for each lane plus
one space for each three hundred (300) square feet
of gross floor area except bowling alley lanes and
approach areas.
D. Clubs, fraternity and sorority houses, rooming
and boarding houses and similar uses having
sleeping and guest rooms: two covered spaces for
each three guest rooms: in dormitories each fifty
(50) square feet shall be considered a guest room,
two spaces shall be required for each guest room
with kitchen facilities.
E. Commercial Uses.
1. Bars and cocktail lounges: one space for each
eighty (80) square feet of gross floor area.
2. Beauty colleges: one space for each one
hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area.
3. Business schools and trade schools: one space
for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross
floor area.
4. Furniture and hardware stores: one space for
each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross
floor area.
5. Offices, general: one space for each two
hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area.
6. Offices, Governmental and Public Utilities.
Govemment offices that generate high levels of
contact with the public, or have high numbers of
employees, including but not limited to employment
offices, public social services offices, department of
motor vehicle offices: one space per seventy-five
(75) square feet of gross floor area for the first
twenty -thousand (20,000) square feet of the
building(s), plus one space per two hundred fifty
(250) square feet of gross floor area for the
remaining floor area.
7. Offices, medical: five spaces for each one
thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area.
8. Restaurants (other than walk-up, drive-
through and drive-in: one space for each one
hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area.
9. Restaurants, walk-up, drive-through and
drive-in without adequate dining room facilities: one
space for each fifty (50) square feet of gross floor
area, but not less than ten spaces.
10. Retail, general retail commercial uses: one
space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet
of gross floor area.
11. Gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, as
follows:
a. less than or equal to three thousand (3,000)
square feet, and with less than or equal to twenty
(20) students at one time if classes are offered: one
space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet of
gross floor area.
b. greater than three thousand (3,000) square
feet, or with more than twenty (20) students at one
time if classes are offered: one space per one
hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area.
F. Hospitals: two spaces for each patient bed.
(17.44) 2
G. Hospitals (mental), convalescent homes, guest
homes, rest homes, sanitariums and similar
institutions: one space for each three beds.
H. Hotels: one space for each unit for the first
fifty (50) units; one space per one and one-half units
after fifty (50); and one space per two units after
one hundred (100) units. Hotels with facilities
including restaurants, banquet rooms, conference
rooms, commercial retail uses and similar activities
shall provide parking for the various uses as
computed separately in accordance with the
provisions of this chapter.
I. Industrial Uses. The parking requirements of
this subsection apply only to industrial uses; parking
for commercial and other permitted uses in
industrial zones shall provide the number of spaces
as otherwise specified by this chapter.
1. Industrial uses of all types; except, public
utility facilities and warehouses: one space for each
vehicle used in conjunction with the use; plus one
space for each three hundred (300) square feet of
gross floor area.
2. Warehouses, buildings or portions of
buildings used exclusively for warehouse purposes:
one space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet
for the first twenty thousand (20,000) square feet;
plus, one space for each two thousand (2,000)
square feet for the second twenty thousand (20,000)
square feet; plus one space for each four thousand
(4,000) square feet in excess of forty thousand
(40,000) square feet; plus one space for each vehicle
operated from the property. Prior to approval of a
warehouse use by the city, a covenant shall be
recorded, guaranteeing the warehouse area, facility
or building will not be converted, remodeled or
changed to a nonwarehouse use unless the number
of spaces otherwise required by this chapter are
secured and provided prior to such change or unless
approved by planning commission in accordance
with this chapter.
J. Mobilehomes or trailer parks: two spaces for
each dwelling unit with at least one space adjacent
to the trailer site.
17.44.030
K. Mortuaries or undertaking establishments: one
space for each seventy-five (75) square feet of
building area for the chapel or public assembly area.
L. Motels: one space for each unit, plus two for
the manager's unit.
M. Recreation or amusement establishments: one
space for each seventy-five (75) square feet of gross
floor area.
N. Service stations: one space for each one
thousand (1,000) square feet of site area.
O. Snack Bar/Snack Shop. The parking
requirements for a snack bar and/or snack shop shall
be the same as that for "restaurant" unless it can be
shown to the planning commission that the
characteristics of the building; it's location, and
other mitigating factors result in less parking being
necessary for the business. (Ord. 95-1126 § 1, 1995;
prior code Appx. A, § 1152)
17.44.040 Parking requirements for the
downtown area.
The following requirements apply within in the
boundary of the downtown area, as defined by the
map incorporated by this reference.
A. The amount of parking shall be calculated at
sixty-five (65) percent of the parking required for
each particular use as set forth in Section 17.44.030.
B. Building sites equal to or less than ten
thousand (10,000) square feet: If the floor area to lot
area ratio is 1:1 or less no parking is required. If the
floor area to lot area ratio exceeds 1:1 only the
excess floor area over the 1:1 ratio shall be
considered in determining the required parking
pursuant to subsection A of this section.
C. Bicycle racks/facilities shall be provided
and/or maintained in conjunction with any
intensification of use, or new construction, in an
amount and location to the satisfaction of the
planning director. (Ord. 94-1099 § 1, 1994: prior
code Appx. A, § 1152.5)
17.44.050 Unlawful to reduce available
parking.
The provision and maintenance of required off -
(17.44) 3
15
17.44.050
street parking facilities and areas, and of area
available to the owner or user of real property for
meeting minimum required parking standards, shall
be a continuing obligation of the property owner
and user. An owner or user of real property
containing uses for which off-street parking facilities
or areas are required by this chapter shall be
prohibited from the following:
A. Reducing, diminishing or eliminating existing
required off-street parking facilities or area under
the ownership or control of such owner or user,
whether on the same lot or on a separate lot from
the use requiring such off-street parking facilities or
area; or
B. Selling, transfering, leasing or otherwise
making unavailable for such required off-street
parking facilities or area any portion of said lot or
of any adjacent lot under the same ownership or
control if the same is necessary for and available to
satisfy in whole or in part the off-street parking
requirements imposed by this chapter. (Prior code
Appx. A, § 1153)
17.44.060 Common parking facilities.
Common parking facilities may be provided to
wholly or partially satisfy the off-street parking
requirements of two or more uses when one or more
of such uses will only infrequently generate use of
such parking area at times when it will ordinarily be
needed by the patrons or employees of the other
use(s).
A. Up to one hundred (100) percent of the
parking requirements of governmental and public
auditorium uses may be allowed to be provided in
such multiple -use parking areas. Up to eighty (80)
percent of the parking requirements of other uses
may be allowed to be provided in such multiple -use
parking areas.
B. The following factors shall be considered in
determining the proportionate part of the required
parking for such use(s):
1. Whether the affected requirements are those
of permanent buildings, or those of mere
occupancies;
2. The peak as well as normal days and hours
of operation of such buildings and of the structures
and occupancies with which it is proposed to share
multiple -use parking areas;
3. Whether the proposed multiple -use parking
area is normally or frequently used by the patrons,
customers or employees of other buildings or
occupancies which will share such parking area at
the same time as the applicant's patrons, customers
and employees will normally or frequently utilize
such parking area;
4. The certainty that the multiple -use parking
area(s) will be available for satisfying such parking
requirements to the extent approved, and the
permanency of such availability;
5. The proximity and accessibility of the
multiple -use parking area(s).
C. A parking plan approval by the planning
commission for multiple -use parking area(s) shall be
so conditioned as to reasonably ensure the
satisfaction of the appropriate parking requirements
during the continued existence of the buildings or
occupancies involved.
D. If the common parking area(s) and the
building sites to be served are subject to more than
one ownership, permanent improvement and
maintenance of such parking facilities must be
provided in one of the following manners:
1. By covenant or contract among all such
property owners; and duly recording an appropriate
covenant running with the land;
2. By the creation of special districts and
imposing of special assessments in any of the
procedures prescribed by state law;
3. By utilizing the authority vested in a parking
authority as provided by state law;
4. By dedicating such common parking area to
the city for parking purposes subject to the
acceptance of such dedication by the city council.
(Prior code Appx. A, § 1154)
17.44.070 Off-street parking—Mixed uses.
Whenever there is a combination of two or more
distinct uses on one lot or building site, the total
number of parking spaces required to be provided
(17.44) 4
�-o
for such lot or building site shall be not less than
the sum total of the parking spaces required for each
of the distinct uses. No off-street parking facilities
provided for one use shall be deemed to provide
parking facilities for any other use except as
otherwise specified within this chapter. (Prior code
Appx. A, § 1155)
17.44.080 Uses not otherwise specified.
The aggregate amount of off-street automobile
parking spaces provided in connection with any use
not otherwise provided for in this chapter shall come
before the commission for parking determination.
(Prior code Appx. A, § 1156)
17.44.090 Off-street parking location.
All off-street automobile parking facilities shall
be located as follows:
A. All parking spaces shall be located on the
same lot or building site as the use for which such
spaces are provided; provided however, that such
parking spaces provided for commercial, business,
industrial or warehouse uses may be located on a
different lot or lots, all of which are less than three
hundred (300) feet distant from the use for which it
is provided, and such lot or lots are under common
ownership with the lot or building site forwhich
such spaces are provided.
Where the buildings are situated on one lot and
the parking is situated on another lot, the owner
shall file with the building department an affidavit
recorded by the office of the Los Angeles County
recorder that these lots are held in common
ownership for the use specified. Such distance shall
be measured along a straight line drawn between the
nearest point on the premises devoted to the use
served by such parking facilities and the nearest
point on the premises providing such parking
facilities.
It is further provided that uses located within the
boundaries of an established off-street parking
district, organized pursuant to action by the city
council, shall be waived by the requirements of this
subsection. ~
17.44.070
B. No parking space required for any residential
use shall be more than two hundred (200) feet total
walking distance from the nearest entrance of the
dwelling unit for which it is provided, except that
residential uses located within the boundaries of an
established off-street parking district, organized
pursuant to action by the city council, shall be
waived by the requirements of this subsection.
C. In residential zones, garages or parking stalls
fronting on a public street shall be set back a
minimum of seventeen (17) feet from the exterior
edge of the nearest public improvement (sidewalk
or street improvement) if roll -up garage doors are
installed, or set back twenty (20) feet if standard
garage doors are installed. On streets where public
improvements for sidewalks have not been
completed the above setback shall be measured from
the edge of the required or planned sidewalk.
Garages or parking stalls fronting on an alley
shall provide one of the following setbacks from the
property line: seventeen (17) feet, nine feet or three
feet, except garages or parking stalls fronting on an
alley of fifteen (15) feet in width or less need only
to comply with the turning radius requirements of
Section 17.44.130.
For purposes of this section the service road
located parallel to Hermosa Avenue approximately
between 27th Street and 35th Street shall be
considered as an alley.
D. Residential parking within the front twenty
(20) feet shall be allowed only when paved and
leading to a garage.
E. A garage may be located on one side lot line
or on a rear property line which does not border a
street or alley when said garage complies with all
of the following:
1. No portion of such garage is more than
thirty-five (35) feet from the rear lot line; and
2. No portion of such garage is closer than three
feet to a habitable building on adjacent lot; and
3. There are no openings on the side of the
garage which are on the property line; and
4. The wall on the side of the garage is
constructed of one-hour fire resistant materials, and
meets all building code regulations; and
(17.44) 5
�-r
17.44.090
5. There has been provision for all roof drainage
to be taken care of on the subject lot; and
6. Such accessory structure is no more than one
story in height and a distance of not less than six
feet from the main building; and
7. Such accessory building is used only for
storage of automobiles, and may be used in
conjunction therewith for open sun deck.
F. Open parking spaces for residential uses in
the open space zone (OS -O) shall be located only
within the rear fifty (50) percent or in the rear forty
(40) feet whichever is the lesser of a residential lot.
(Ord. 96-1153 § 1, 1996; Ord. 94-1120 § 1, 1994;
prior code Appx. A, § 1157)
17.44.100 Size of spaces.
A. No parking space for residential uses within
any building shall be less than an inside dimension
of eight feet, 'six inches wide or less than twenty
(20) feet long.
B. Parking spaces, not within a building, shall
comply with the parking lot design standards
attached hereto, with the following exceptions:
1. In residential zones, guest parking spaces
located in tandem behind a required parking space
shall have a minimum length of seventeen (17) feet.
2. Guest parking spaces situated parallel to
alleys and located behind garage doors with a nine -
foot setback shall have a minimum length of
twenty-two (22) feet.
C. Parking lot design standards for commercial
and manufacturing uses are amended to allow the
inclusion of thirty (30) percent compact car spaces
in lots of ten or more stalls. (Prior code Appx. A,
§ 1158)
17.44.110 Tandem parking and entry -way
standards for residential
parking.
A. No entrancewayfor vehicular access to any
garage shall be less than eight feet wide. No such
entranceway shall have less than six feet eight
inches vertical clearance.
B. In all residential zones, required parking
spaces including replacement of on -street parking
may be tandem. In the R-1 zone only, tandem
parking may be accessed directly from a public
street.
Guest spaces in all residential zones may be
located in garage setbacks of seventeen (17) feet or
nine feet as required in Section 17.44.090(C);
provided, they comply with the dimensional require-
ments specified in Section 17.44.100. However, in
no case may one guest space be located behind
another guest space.
The second floor level of a dwelling unit may
project over a driveway fronting on a street or alley
to within the prescribed setback required by the
zone in which the development is proposed, or
exists. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1159)
17.44.120 Driveways.
Off-street automobile parking facilities shall be
provided with driveways providing vehicular access
to such facilities from a public street or alley as
follows:
A. The minimum driveway width shall be nine
feet, clear of all obstructions.
B. All driveways and parking spaces shall be
paved with not less than three and one-half inches
of portland cement concrete, except that when
supported by a selected rock base which is
acceptable to the chief building inspector for the
type of soil upon which it is constructed, driveways
may be paved with a minimum of two inches of
asphaltic concrete.
C. All such driveways for vehicular access to
parking spaces provided for any residential use shall
be located wholly on the same lot as the parking
spaces for which such driveway provides access,
except in the -case of common driveways. In the
case of common driveways, easements of five feet
on adjoining properties may be combined to create
a driveway ten feet in width.
Where access to required off-street parking spaces
is via a common driveway, the owner shall file with
the building department an affidavit recorded by the
office of the Los Angeles County recorder that joint
easements exist for the purpose of the driveway.
1
(17.44) 6
• •
17.44.120
D. No driveway providing access to any off-
street parking space or garage shall have a slope
greater than twenty (20) percent; provided, that any
ramp slope in excess of twelve and one-half (12 1/2)
percent includes transitions on each side with a
minimum length of eight feet and a maximum slope
of one-half the maximum ramp slope, in accordance
with the driveway grade standards set forth below;
further, any area used for guest parking shall have
a maximum slope of twelve and one-half (12 1/2)
percent. (Ord. 93-1089 § 1, 1993; prior code Appx.
A, § 1160)
DRIVEWAY TRANSITIONS
8'-0' min.
Transition
8-0' min.
8'-0' min.
Transition
NOTE:
No part of ramp shall enchroach into the Public Right -of -Way
(17.44) 8
17.44.130 Turning radii, stall width and
aisle width.
For the purpose of determining access to garages
or open parking spaces, the minimum dimensions
for turning radii, for stall widths, and for aisle
widths shall be as set forth in the "parking lot
design standards," on file with the city. Where an
angle of parking other than one listed in the attached
standards is proposed, the chief building inspector
shall determine by interpolation the dimensions
required for such parking. (Prior code Appx. A, §
1161)
�/ 17.44.140 Requirements for new and
existing construction.
A. For every residential dwelling hereafter
erected, parking spaces shall be provided,
permanently maintained and permanently available
as set forth in Section 17.44.020, including
requirements for turning radii, as provided by this
chapter, and the parking standards contained herein.
B. For every residential building hereafter which
is structurally altered to increase gross floor area,
there shall be provided, permanently maintained and
permanently available, two parking spaces for each
existing unit, including requirements for turning
radius and parking standards as required by this
chapter: During the life of a building, a single
addition of not more than one hundred (100) square
feet may be constructed without compliance with
this section, and •a maximum of two hundred fifty
(250) square feet may be constructed if at least one
parking space is available with the same requirement
as noted above for each existing unit, except that
nonconforming uses require planning commission
approval.
C. Before any additional units may be added to
a lot where there now exists a building or buildings
used for human habitation, there shall be provided,
permanently maintained and permanently available,
two parking spaces for each existing unit, including
requirements for turning radius and size, as provided
by this article and parking standards herein.
Exception to subsections B and C of this section:
Existing garages or parking spaces for existing units
17.44.130
eight and one-half feet wide by eighteen (18) feet
deep inside measurement, having access from any
alley or street and having a distance of not less than
twenty (20) feet from the far side of such alley or
street, with a minimum eight feet wide driveway, in
the clear, will be considered to meet the parking
requirements and turning radius of this chapter.
D. For every building in a C or M zone hereafter
erected, or reconstructed, or expanded, the parking
requirements and turning area for the entire building
shall be as set forth in this chapter. However for an
expansion of an existing building legally
nonconforming to parking requirements, parking
requirements shall only be applied to the amount of
expansion, subject to Section 17.44.040 for
expansions in the downtown area. In no case shall
new construction reduce the parking serving an
existing use below the requirements of this chapter.
E. When the use of an existing building or
structure is changed to a more intense use with a
higher parking demand there shall be no additional
parking requirement for sites in the downtown area
except to the extent there is a change of floor area
to lot area ratio in excess of 1:1. Otherwise, the
requirement for additional parking, shall be
calculated as the difference between the required
parking as stated in this chapter for that particular
use as compared to the requirement for the existing
or previous use which shall be met prior to
occupying the building unless otherwise specified in
this chapter. (Ord. 94-1099 § 2, 1994; prior code
Appx. A, § 1162)
17.44.150 Underground parking facilities.
Underground parking facilities shall conform to
all the provisions of this chapter, provided however,
that underground parking facilities may be located
in the side, front and rear yards which are
completely belowexisting ground level. However,
in the side yards and rear yards not abutting a street,
the grade may be raised an average of three feet
with 'a maximum of six feet above the existing
grade, provided beth side yards are provided with
cement stops in order not to obstruct any pedestrian
way. No portion of such facility shall have less. than
(17.44) 9
2S
17.44.150
seven feet inside vertical clearance, except doorways
may be six feet eight inches. (Prior code Appx. A,
§ 1163)
17.44.160 Required improvement and
maintenance of parking area.
Every lot or area used for a public or private
parking area shall be developed and maintained in
the following manner:
A. Surface Parking Area.
1. Off-street parking areas shall be paved with
not less than two-inch asphaltic or three and one-
half inch portland cement concrete surfacing and
maintained so as to eliminate dust or mud and shall
be so graded and drained as to dispose of all surface
water. In no case shall drainage be allowed across
sidewalks or driveways, except residential use.
2. Designated parking spaces shall be indicated
with paint or approved stripping material on the
surface of the parking area.
B. Border Barricades, Screening and
Landscaping.
1. Off-street parking area that is not separated
by a fence from any street, alley or property line
upon which it abuts, shall be provided with a
suitable concrete curb or timber barrier of dressed
dimension stock not less than six inches in height,
located not less than two feet from such street or
alley property lines, and such curb or barrier shall
be securely installed and maintained; provided no
such curb or barrier shall be required across any
driveway or entrance to such parking area.
2. Any unenclosed off-street parking area
abutting property located in one of the R zones shall
be separated -from such property by a solid masonry
wall six feet in height measured from the grade of
the finished surface of such parking lot closest to
the contiguous R zone property; provided, that along
the required front yard, the solid masonry wall shall
not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height. No such
solid masonry wall need be provided where the
elevation of that portion of the parking area
immediately adjacent to an R zone is six feet or
more below the elevation of such R zone property
along the common property line.
C. Lighting. Any lights provided to illuminate
any off-street parking area or used car sales area
permitted by this ordinance shall be arranged so as
to reflect the light away from any street or premises
upon which a dwelling unit is located.
D. Entrances and Exits. The location and design
of all entrances and exits shall be subject to the
approval of the city engineer.
E. Traffic Circulation. Traffic circulation within
off-street parking facilities except for residential
parking shall be designed to ensure that no
automobile need enter a major street in order to
progress from one aisle to any other aisle within the
same parking lot, or enter such major street
backwards in order to leave such lot. If such
circulation is not otherwise possible, a turnaround
area within such lot, not less than thirty (30) feet in
diameter, shall be provided. Directional signs or
markings shall be provided in all facilities in which
one-way traffic has been established.
- F. Authorized Vehicles. In all residential zones,
parking spaces shall be maintained free and clear
and utilized solely for the parking of authorized
vehicles (obstructive storage prohibited).
"Authorized vehicles" shall mean automobiles,
motorcycles, light trucks and vans not exceeding
one and one-half ton capacity. Trailers, boats,
recreational vehicles, motor homes, campers (not
mounted to a motorized vehicle), tractor trucks and
inoperable vehicles are prohibited. (Prior code Appx.
A, § 1164)
17.44.170 Parking area in R-3 or R -P
zones.
Every parking area located in an R-3 or R -P zone
shall be governed by the following provisions in
addition to those required above:
A. No parking lot to be used as an accessory to
a commercial or industrial establishment shall be
established until it shall first have been reviewed by
the planning commission and its location approved.
Such approval may be conditioned upon the
commission's required lighting, planting and/or
maintenance of trees, shrubs or other landscaping
within and along the borders of such parking area.
(17.44) 10
B. Such a parking lot to be used as an accessory
to a permitted commercial or industrial
establishment shall be so located that the boundary
of such parking lot closest to the site of the
commercial or industrial establishment to which it
is accessory shall be not more than fifty (50) feet
distant.
C. Such parking lot shall be used solely for the
parking of private passenger vehicles.
D. No sign of any kind, other than one
designating entrances, exits or conditions of use
shall be maintained on such parking lot. Any such
sign shall not exceed eight square feet in area. (Prior
code Appx. A, § 1165)
17.44.180 Resulting fractions.
When calculating the number of off-street
automobile parking spaces required by this code for
any particular use, building or structure, or
integrated group of uses, buildings or structures, any
resulting fraction less than one-half shall be
disregarded, and any such fraction one-half or
greater shall be construed as requiring one additional
parking space. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1166)
17.44.190 Off-street parking within
vehicle parking districts.
A. Parking requirements within parking districts
shall be as provided in this chapter, except that
when the city council provides for contributions to
an improvement fund in lieu of parking spaces so
required, said contributions shall be considered to
satisfy the requirements of this chapter.
If the downtown business area enhancement
district commission determines that the private party
is responsible for the in -lieu fee, the private party
shall pay said fee as requested by the DBAEDC.
B. The building director shall be responsible for
the calculations required under this chapter and the
building department shall calculate and collect the
in -lieu contribution for, and as directed by,
resolutions passed by the vehicle parking district
commission, as approved by the city council.
C. The following allowances for parking maybe
allowed with a parking plan as approved by the
17.44.170
planning commission and as prescribed in Section
17.44.210.
1. Building sites containing less than four
thousand one (4,001) square feet with a ratio of
building floor area to building site of one to one or
less may pay an "in -lieu" fee for all required spaces.
2. Building sites of less than four thousand one
(4,001) square feet where buildings will exceed a
one to one gross floor area to building site area ratio
shall be required to provide a minimum of twenty-
five (25) percent of the required parking on-site.
3. Building sites containing four thousand one
(4,001) square feet or greater but less than twelve
thousand one (12,001) square feet shall be required
to provide a minimum of fifty (50) percent of all
required parking on-site.
4. Building sites with or greater than twelve
thousand one (12,001) square feet shall be required
to provide one hundred (100) percent of all required
parking on-site. (Ord. 94-1099 § 4, 1994; prior code
Appx. A, § 1167)
17.44.200 Assignment of off-street
residential parking spaces.
Required off-street parking spaces, except guest
spaces, shall be permanently assigned and/or rented
with each unit on the basis of the required parking
per unit stated under Section 17.44.020, and the unit
occupant shall be given sole use of said spaces for
vehicle parking only. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1168)
17.44.210 Parking plans.
A. A parking plan may be approved by the
planning commission to allow for a reduction in the
number of spaces required. The applicant shall
provide the information necessary to show that
adequate parking will be provided for customers,
clients, visitors and employees or when located in
a vehicle parking district, the applicant shall propose
an in -lieu fee according to requirements of this
chapter.
B. Factors such as the following shall be taken
into consideration:
1. Van pools;
2. Bicycle and foot traffic;
• •
17.44.210
3. Common parking facilities;
4. Varied work shifts;
5. Valet parking;
6. Unique features of the proposed uses;
7. Peak hours of the proposed use as compared
with other uses sharing the same parking facilities
especially in the case of small restaurants or snack
shops in the downtown area or in multitenant
buildings;
8. Other methods of reducing parking demand.
C. A covenant with the city a party thereto, may
be required limiting the use of the property and/or
designating the method by which the required
parking will be provided at the time that the
planning commission determines that inadequate
parking exists.
D. Fees, application and processing procedures
for parking plans shall set forth by resolution of the
city council. (Ord. 94-1099 § 3, 1994; prior code
Appx. A, § 1169)
17.44.220 Consolidated off-street parking.
Subject to approval by the planning commission
as prescribed in Section 17.44.210, required parking
spaces for various uses may be reduced in number
and computed at one space per two hundred fifty
(250) square feet of gross floor area when parking
is consolidated in retail shopping centers over ten
thousand (10,000) square feet in size, or where
public parking areas are created to take the place of
on-site parking within vehicle parking districts.
(Prior code Appx. A, § 1170)
V. ASSMT. SEE: 159- 8
HERMOSA BEACH
M.B. 1-25-26
ki
IDO
66%//U/ Yrv.4..• .
•
4110,0
ASSESSOr S NAP
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
01/4/1998 15:02 3109375
pew s_
awn
NEWTON LAW OFF.
Arm Nawro,
PAGE 01
saitW7aN
DATE •
I MlCssri. �� �aaw WAX UM
-14s420
ters.swwasaa MOS aa!
JAN 1
% / (1-- 9 e _ _- - .
Tzta:
_____.
TO: ..}
gae1�7.�C9,,N)
.)
FAX #: 4937^G.,3
FROM :
-Sl,/ /kl,./r 7A
RE: .w
r.�a - /. a. • !� r' i ode_
TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING
COMMENTS -
1?-77-;49e/V4/1 /9/e6-.4
COVER SHEET:
6) Fye 'A-14-e6'iA)i9L e- B¢
1r • = ti^ ' .. .
_ . 4.I 0 - as. //
itRNLIA/ 7/0
=ASd I) 4iz7X-rii,t) ,445 '. ,tLiK.. 6.2
/,44/V/
S'r
L-.0'0 ./
%'!. * - -- . Z�d
MOs mega is intended only far
that is madidemial.
the use of this individual or cntirf to which it is addressed sad may contain inform
or fOr which disclosure is restricted under applicable lar. lithe raider o[this
you ase hereby notified that any diastruinstiou or may copying or clistraunag c
!fyuu received this message in error, piano notify us may.
=CFI -V=4 PLEASE CALL (3t-;) .37-5600 •
privileged aadkr
manage is not th a intended recipient.
this eennenadostinn is strictly prvhbited.
I7 ALL P i.9 jIfE NOT
01/14/98 15:17
TX/RX NO.2877 P.001
saw -Mica
4 1998
6-
•
01/14/1998 15:02
31093ZIt
1. Basic Lease
1.1 arties:
October �0 , 1969
Leslie A. Newton
business under th
"Lessee").
1.2 Premise
consisting of app
the building commo
Hermosa Beach, Ca
1.3 Use: B
1.4 Term:
years, commencing
November 30, 1994
1.5 Base Re
mon , commencing
as set forth in p
1.6 Rase Re
1991, December 1,
payable under par
paragraph 4.2 bel
NEWTON LAW
r .
LEASE
PAGE 02
ovisions ("Basic Lease Provisions").
This Lease, dated, for reference purposes only,
is made by and between Jerry L. Newton and
herein called "Lessor") and Del Gallup, doing
name of The Penthouse Salon, (herein called
: Suite Number X&J, located on the second floor,
oximately 1,350 square feet, more or less, of
ly described as being located at 49 Pier Avenue,
ifornia (the "Premises").
auty Salon, subject to paragraph 6.
he initial term of this lease shall be five (5)
• camber 1, 1999 ("Commencement Date") and ending
as defined in paragraph 3.
t: The Base Rent is
per month, payable on the first day of each
December 1, 1989 and continuing until adjustment
ragraph 1.6.
.t Increase: On December 1, 1990, December 1,
1992, and December 1993 the monthly Base Rent
graph 1.5 above shall be adjusted as provided in
41
1.7 Rent Pa
upon execution of
months rent.
1.8 securit
2. Premises and
2.1 Premise
complex, herein s.
in paragraph 1.3
Building, the Co..
located, along wi
or thereunder ar
Lessor hereby lea
the term, at the
herein, the rea
Provisions, parag
the Common Areas
2.2 CoRmon
defined as a/2 are
the exterior bou
w.
d Upon Execution: Lessee shall pay to Lessor
this lease the sum ofd for the first
Deposit: Jggimmi.
Common Areas.
. The Premises are a portion of a two -building
metimcs referredsto as the "Building" identified
f the Basic Lease Provisions. The Premises, the
on Areas, the land upon which the same are
h all other buildings and improvements thereon
collectively referred to as "Loreto Plaza".
es to Lessee and Lessee leases from Lessor for
ental, and upon all of the conditions set forth
property referred to in the Basic Lease
aph 1.2, as the "Premises", including rights to
s hereinafter specified.
reas-Definition: The term "Common Areas" is
s and facilities outside the Premises and within
dary of Loreto Plaza that are provided a -
Initi ls: Dir
1
01/14/98 15:17
3�
-
TX/RX NO.2877 P.002
•
01/14/1998 15:02 31093750
NEWTON LAW C11111k
ADDENDUM TO LEAVE
PAGE 03
JAN 141998
ThIs IS AN ADDENDUM to that lease agreement dated October 26,
1989 between Jerry L. Newton and Leslie A. Newton as Lessors and
Del Gallup, doing business under the name of The Penthouse Salon,
as Lessee.
1. PREMISES. Lessors lease to Lessee and Lessee leases from
Lessor an additional space located immediately to the north of
Lessee's current space at 49 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach,
California, consisting of approximately six hundred twenty four
(624) square feet (hereinafter referred to as the "Additional
Space"). As of the execution of this addendum, the entire area of
the premises leased from Lessors by Lessee shall be approximately
One Thousand Nine Hundred seventy-four (1,974) square feet.
2. LEASE CONDITIONAL. The lease for the Additional Space is
conditional upon the execution by Hugo Capdevila and Maria Cecelia
Capdevila, doing business as Casablanca Restaurant at 49 and 53
Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California, of a new lease for a term
commencing March 1, 1991 for the remainder of the space they
currently occupy at Loreto Plaza.
2. TERM. The term of the lease for the Additional Space
shall commence on March 1, 1991 and shall terminate according to
the terms of the original Lease.
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay Lessors Base Rent of Mew
1111111111.11111111111111116111111111"1"."."1"111111.111111111."171111111)
per month for
the first year of the term, commencing 1, 1991, for the
Additional SpaCe.
4. BASE RENT INCREASE. On December 1, 1991, December lig;)
Lessors' Initials;��� /� Lessee's Initials:
01/14/98 15:17
3'2
TX/RX NO.2877 P.003
■
01/14/1998 15:02
310937
1992, and Dece
paragraph 3 abov
the Lease.
5. BECURI
of this Addend
Additional Spac
5. OPTION
the teres for
lease, which
exercise of
October 26, 19
6. ALT
obligation to
be responsible
in their curre
7. ADDIT
execution of t
the premises c
space. Any
exercised as
under this Ad
under the Leas
be considered
8. 'NCO
of the Lease w
this Addendum
applicable to
Lessors' Initi
NEWTON LAW 01111E PAGE 04
r 1, 1993 the monthly Base Rent payable under
shall be adjusted as provided in paragraph 4.2 of
DEPOSIT. Lessee shall pay Lessor, upon execution
the sum of visas a security deposit for the
TO EXTEND. Lessee shall have an option to extend
Additional space on the terms set forth in the
ion may only be exercised in conjunction with the
option contained in the lease agreement dated
9.
RATIONS/MODIFICATIONS. Lessors shall have no
odify or alter the Additional Space. Lessee shall
for all such modifications and accepts the premises
t "as is" condition.
ONAL SPACE NOT DIVISIBLE YROX ORIGINAL SPACE. Upon
is Addendum, the premises covered by the Lease and
vered by this Addendum shall be considered a single
ption to extend the term of the lease must be
o the entire premises.
Any breach of or default
endum shall be considered a breach of and default
and any breach of or default under the Lease shall
breach of and default under this Addendum.
RATION Or LEASE. All of the remaining provisions
ich are not inconsistent with the terms contained in
are incorporated into this Addendum and made
e lease of the Additional Space.
I
2
01/14/98 15:17
33
Lessee's Initials:
TX/RX NO.2877 P.004
I
01/14/1998 15:02 31093759
DATED: Februa 1991
DATED:
NEWTON LAW OFF.
ORS:
PAGE 05
3
LIE
LESSS
puDLL G
01/14/98 15:17
2 �
TX/RX NO.2877 P.005
•
c Hearing opened at 7:08 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz.
Mike Man 29256 Palos Verdes Drive East, Rancho Palos Verdes, applicant, addr- : ed the
Commission . . stated that he had read the conditions and agrees to comply wit em.
Comm. Marks questio - d whether it would be appropriate to impose a dition specifying a
date by which all conditio should be in compliance.
Mr. Schubach explained that suc . condition could be ad. - . ; however, he had no concerns
over this business or the applicant's ntion to comply h all conditions.
Public Hearing closed at 7:10 P.M. by Chmn. K
MOTION by Chmn. Ketz, seconded by ' omm. Peir to approve staffs recommendation,
Resolution P.C. 91-11, as written.
AYES: Comm. .. , Peirce, Chmn. Ketz
NOES: Non
ABSTAIN: , e
ABSENT: Comms. Aleks, Rue
Chmn. stated tated that this decision of the PlanningCommission maybe
tot ity Council within ten days.
appealed b ting
CUP 90-35 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ENCLOSE OUTDOOR DINING
AREA AT 49 AND 53 PIER AVENUE. CASABLANCA RESTAURANT IN LORETO PLAZA
Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated January 24, 1991, and recommended approval of the
request, subject to the conditions specified in the proposed resolution.
The approximate size of the existing restaurant is 2500 square feet inside and 380 square feet
outside. The restaurant is currently operating with a Type 41 alcohol license, which allows for
beer and wine in an eating establishment.
On September 4, 1990, the owners of Loreto Plaza requested that the City consider a
lease/license agreement to enclose the aerial walkway/bridge which crosses City property for
additional seating space for the Casablanca Restaurant within Loreto Plaza.
The walkway area has already been approved for outside dining pursuant to a CUP granted on
January 10, 1977.
The Planning Commission also approved an amendment to the CUP in 1978 to allow service of
general alcohol; however, the business has never obtained a full service alcohol license from
the State Alcoholic Beverage Control. Thus, the CUP has not been executed and is now null and
void.
The recent request was forwarded to the Council for consideration, and the Council on October
23, 1990, directed that the request be processed as a CUP amendment prior to taking action on
the lease agreement.
Two aerial walkways connect the second floors of the western and eastern portions of Loreto
Plaza. The northerly walkway connects Casablanca's banquet facilities and restrooms with
the main portion of the restaurant. The walkway is currently partially enclosed with windows
on the north and a canvas awning on top. The applicant would like to completely enclose this
area with a predominantly glass enclosure. The submitted plans also show the use of the entire
area for tables.
P.C. Minutes 2/5/91
35
• •
The CUP granted in 1977 contains a condition that at least a five-foot walkway be provided
along the walkway. This walkway is clearly necessary so that customers and employees can
conveniently travel to the banquet room and restroom from the main portion of the restaurant
and back. Otherwise, it would be necessary to use the southerly aerial walkway. As such, staff
felt that the use of this enclosed area for seating should only be permitted if an adequate
walkway is maintained. Staff therefore recommended a condition that a five-foot aisle be
clearly marked to perpetually maintain access. The applicant has indicated that this is not a
problem and stated that the plans incorrectly show tables filling the whole space and blocking
the access.
Otherwise, staff had no further concerns and recommended only that the CUP conditions be
upgraded to include all currently applicable standard conditions for restaurants with beer and
wine service and to include conditions that require the City to be insured from any liability
because of the use of City property for outside dining purposes. These types of conditions
requiring insurance are typical of the CUPs previously granted for other outside dining areas
on City property.
Obtaining the CUP amendment is only the first step prior to approval for outside dining. Since
the walkway is located on City property, approval is also necessary from the City Council for
the appropriate lease agreement for use of City property.
Public Hearing opened at 7:15 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz.
Jerry Newton, 2041 Circle Drive, Hermosa Beach, applicant, addressed the Commission and:
(1) explained that he does not propose to enclose a bridge that is owned by the City; (2) said that,
pursuant to a written agreement in 1975, the property owner was given the right to construct
the bridge between the two adjoining buildings; (3) continued by explaining that the bridgeways
themselves are not owned by the City, and the proposal is to enclose a bridge which is privately
owned but which is in City airspace; (4) continued by discussing the configuration of the
building and walkway.
Mr. Newton continued and: (1) explained that he is not proposing to change any use of the
walkway; (2) noted that the restaurant has been in existence since 1976, and the bridge is
already three-quarters enclosed; (3) stated that he is now proposing to completely enclose the
area; (4) said that he has no problems with the staff -imposed conditions, other than Condition
No. 2 pertaining to hours of operation; (5) explained that he would someday like to have a
breakfast service; therefore, he asked for approval to open at 6:30 A.M. in order to
accommodate breakfast service; (6) stated that he did not feel a breakfast service will have a
negative impact on the surrounding area, noting that the restaurant is quite a distance from
any residential areas.
Mr. Newton, in response to questions from Comm: Marks, stated that no additional parking is
proposed, explaining that patrons use the parking lot behind the plaza.
Shirley Castle, Monterey, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and opposed approval of
the request, stating that the proposed use would take away from the public open space area. She
stressed that the bridge is covering an area which should be returned to a public parklet. She
also opposed approval because there is not adequate parking for the site. She urged denial of
the project based on the negative impacts it will create.
Public Hearing closed at 7:23 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz.
Mr. Schubach, in response to question from Comm. Peirce, explained that this business is in
the Vehicle Parking District, and the parking area behind the building is intended to provide
parking for the surrounding businesses. He stated that this use has already been approved; the
request is now to enclose the area. He explained that no additional square footage is being
proposed.
-
P.C. Minutes 2/5/91
C
C
C-
• •
Comm. Marks asked questions related to why this business does not need to provide additional
parking, to which Mr. Schubach explained that since the proposal does not increase square
footage, additional parking is not required.
Comm. Marks noted concern that the enclosed dining area might draw more customers,
thereby creating an impact because of the increased usage. He therefore questioned whether
additional parking should be required.
Mr. Lee explained that the use of the balcony area has already been approved for outdoor
dining. Enclosure of the area will not increase the square footage; therefore, there is no legal
requirement to require additional parking.
Comm. Marks felt that the enclosure would allow for year-round use even in bad weather, as
opposed to partial use, such as during the summer months only.
Mr. Schubach explained that in Southern California, weather conditions are not normally
taken into account, since heaters can be installed in uncovered patio areas.
Mr. Schubach stressed, in response to Comm. Marks' concerns, that no increased square
footage would be allowed unless all required parking is provided.
MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Chmn. Ketz, to approve staffs recommendation,
Resolution P.C. 91-15, with one modification: that Condition No. 2 be amended to read: 'The
hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:30 A.M, and 1:00 A.M. daily."
AYES: Comms. Marks, Peirce, Chmn. Ketz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Comm. Rue
Chmn. Ketz noted that this decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed by writing
to the City Council within ten days.
CUP 90=31 -- MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR OUTSIDE))ING
AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 16 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY, HERMOSA PAVILION (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF AANUARY 15.
1991)
Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated January 17, 1991, and re mended approval of the
request, subject to the conditionsspecified in the proposed res91 ion.
At their meeting of January 15, 1991, a Planning mmission continued this request for
advertisement as a master CUP for all outs &dintn at the Pavilion.
The parking plan which governs the use of the Pavilion originally allowed up to 19,450 square
feet of restaurant space including outside dining. Staff,has calculated that, based on the
approved plans and the agreement "to reduce outside diningby 1000 square feet, the final
amount of outside dining is asr'oximately 3530 square feet.
The original plans shy ave 1l the outside dining located along the sout end of the upper
floor. The current-6perators, however, have agreed to lease the balcony fa Pacific Coast
Highway to Picsso's for outside dining. This area is approximately 500 sqrre feet. In
addition, tire -outside dining area adjacent to the area approved for Monkee's res urant is
approximately 1230 square feet. As a result, only 1800 square feet is left for the large outdoor
dining area located toward the southwest corner of the upper floor, about 1100 square feet less
than what is shown on the original plans.
37
P.C. Minutes 2/5/91
P.C. RESOLUTION 99-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW THE
EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE
ALCOHOL AND TO ALLOW THE PAYMENT OF FEES IN -LIEU OF
PARKING (ALLOWING THE CHANGE OF USE OF 1150 SQUARE
FEET OF OFFICE TO RESTAURANT USE) AT 53 PIER AVENUE,
LOCATED IN THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE LORETO PLAZA
COMMERCIAL BUILDING, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 22, 23,
AND 24, BLOCK 13 HERMOSA BEACH TRACT
Section 1. An application was filed by Gary Vincent, owner of the business "Fat Face
Fenner's Fishack", seeking approval to expand an existing restaurant with on -sale alcohol. The
applicant is proposing to expand 1150 square feet by converting existing office space to
restaurant use within the building, requiring an amendment to the existing Conditional Use
Permit, and requiring a Parking Plan pursuant to Section 17.44.210 of the Zoning Ordinance to
allow the change of use with less than required parking based on a payment of fees in -lieu of
required parking (Section 17.44.190).
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the application for amendment of a Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan on
May 17, 1999, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and
considered by the Planning Commission.
Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
makes the following factual findings:
1. On January 13, 1998, The Planning Commission approved the applicant's request
for on -sale alcohol, live entertainment, and extended hours in conjunction with an existing
restaurant use located within the second floor of the Loreto Plaza commercial building
(previously "Casablanca" restaurant).
2. The applicant proposes to expand the restaurant by converting 1,150 square feet of
the contiguous building interior (existing office space) utilizing a shared kitchen with no
through pedestrian access.
3. The change of use to a more intense use requires additional parking pursuant to
Section 17.44.140(E) of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant proposes to contribute fees in -
lieu of parking pursuant to Section 17.44.190.
4. Given the existing lot size and building coverage it is not feasible to provid
additional off-street parking on site without a complete redevelopment of the site.
Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes
the following findings pertaining to the application for the Parking Plan:
3S
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
1. The site is zoned C-2, and is suitable for the proposed use with the proposed
amendment;
2. The existing use with the proposed expansion is compatible with surrounding
commercial and residential uses.
3. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any
negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties.
4. Calculating the increased parking requirement based on the credit for a previous
restaurant use converted to office within the building, and pursuant 17.44.140 (E) when the use
of an existing building is changed to a more intense use, and applying a portion of the credit to
outdoor dining (2 parking spaces), results in a net additional off-street parking requirement of 5
spaces for the proposed expansion.
5. The City Council, at its meeting of May 25, 1999, continued the parking in -lieu fee
program, and determined that the parking in -lieu fee is $12,500 per required parking space,
payable in lump sum prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
6. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303c of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the
Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Plan, subject to the following Conditions of
Approval, which supersede the conditions as contained in Planning Commission
Resolution 98-1:
CONDITIONS OF THE PARKING PLAN:
1. The proposed expansion shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans.
Modifications to any of the plans shall be reviewed and may be approved by the
Community Development Director.
2. In order to compensate for required parking that cannot be provided on site, the
applicant shall contribute fees to the City's parking improvement fund in lieu of the
required three parking spaces, as set forth in Section 17.44.190 of the Zoning
Ordinance, at the amount of $12,500 per required space as set forth by resolution of
the City Council. The payment of fees in -lieu of parking shall be madeprior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the expanded area of the restaurant.
CONDITIONS FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE RESTAURANT WITH
ON -SALE ALCOHOL:
3. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours between 9:00 P.M. to
1:15 A.M. Monday through Friday, and from 2:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. on Saturday,
Sundays, and Federal and State Holidays, Cinco De Mayo, and St. Patrick's day.
4. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or
commercial establishments nearby.
5. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory
techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons
outside the business and in nearby public areas.
6. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the
City's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential
neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments.
7. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists, and may
authorize the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to
eliminate the problem, and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission,
which will automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the
Commission.
8. The exterior of all the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and
maintained free of graffiti at all times.
9. Any significant changes to the interior layout, which would alter the primary
function of the business as a restaurant, shall be subject to review and approval by
the Planning Commission.
10. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable
requirements of the Municipal Code.
CONDITIONS RELATING TO LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AND NOISE:
11. If entertainment is to include amplified live entertainment, an acoustical study
shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and
shall be implemented in the building.
12. Management shall be responsible for maintaining music/entertainment volumes at
reasonable levels.
13. During any live entertainment and/or dancing, the exterior doors and windows
shall remain closed. The building shall be equipped with air conditioning to
ensure comfort of patrons during live entertainment, and compliance with this
condition.
14. All exterior glass windows or doors shall be equipped with double -pane glass or a
comparable substitute with equivalent sound dampening properties to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
15. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by
the city's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding
residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating
from the property shall be monitored to verify compliance with the noise
ordinance in response to any complaints.
Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the
owners of the property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the
Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to
accept, all of the conditions of this grant.
The Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Plan shall be recorded, and proof of
recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department.
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is
found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable.
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees
from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to
attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicabl
time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any
claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate
fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
harmless the City.
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be
required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant.
Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall
not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition.
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any
development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any
development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions.
The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan and may
amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate
detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use.
• .
VOTE: AYES: Comms.Perrotti,Pizer,Schwartz,Chmn.Tucker
NOES: None
ABSENT: Comm.Ketz
ABSTAIN: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 99- 27 is a true and complete record of the action
taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular
meeting -6f lyiay 171999.
d
Peter Tucker, Cha
Date
ecretary
f:b95\cd\pc\ 1999\05-17-99\pprs53b.rt
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 •
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
• •
P.C. RESOLUTION 98-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PARKING
PLAN TO ALLOW THE SHARED USE OF EXISTING REQUIRED
PARKING FOR BUSINESSES AT 200 PIER AVENUE WITH OFF-
SITE BUSINESSES AT NIGHTTIME, AT 200 PIER AVENUE,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 15, 16, 17, 18, AND THE
NORTHERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 14, BLOCK 48, FIRST ADDITION
TO HERMOSA BEACH
Section 1. An application was filed by Warren Miller, the property owner, seeking
approval to share existing required parking at 200 Pier Avenue pursuant to 17.44.060 Common
Parking Facilities which allows parking to be shared for two or more uses. The applicant is
proposing to make 21 of the existing 44 parking spaces available to off-site business during off-
peak parking demand hours of the on-site business: between 6:00 P.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing
to consider the application for a Parking Plan on March 17, and July 21, 1998, at which
testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning
Commission
Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
makes the following factual findings:
1. The existing 44 off-street parking spaces are required for the tenants of the subject
office/commercial building providing a ratio of 1 space per 280 square feet.
2. The building is occupied by office, commercial service and retail uses whose peak
operation times are typically on weekdays between 8:00 AM. and 6:00 P.M.
3. The applicant proposes to set aside less than 50% of the required parking, as allowed
pursuant to Section 17.44.060(A) for off-site businesses during the off-peak hours. The parking
is not being proposed to satisfy required parking for any particular business. The applicant
instead desires to lease it on a monthly basis to any business or businesses that may desire
additional parking for customers over and above their current required parking. Any future use of
the parking as required parking for a new restaurant or restaurant expansion would require
approval of another Parking Plan specific to that restaurant.
Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the
following findings pertaining to the application for the Parking Plan:
1. The proposed shared parking will serve to address a shortage of available parking
when its most needed in the downtown area in an accessible location within short walking
distance of the highest concentration of restaurants.
2. The existing commercial tenant uses of the building allows for the shared parking, and
the anticipated use of the building, because of its design an orientation for offices and
�-3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
s
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
• .
commercial service uses should allow for shared parking into the future. Based on the list
provided by the applicant, and staff's observation of the current use of the parking lot, the spaces
that will be retained for tenant's use after hours should be more than adequate The imposition of
conditions as required by this resolution to make more available if and when its needed by the
tenants will mitigate any negative impacts on the tenants or nearby residential or commercial
properties;
3. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303 of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the
Parking Plan, subject to the following Conditions of Approval:
1. A minimum of 23 parking spaces shall always remain available for on-site tenants.
The balance of the parking area (a maximum of 21 spaces as currently striped,
with a potentially greater number if tandem parked) may be made available for
one off-site lessee after 6:00 P.M., daily.
2. The off-site lessee shall provide valet service for use of available shared parking
spaces.
2. Signs shall be provided within the parking area to clearly indicate the rules
specifying authorized users and time limitations, clearly designating on-site tenant
spaces and available parking spaces for the off-site lessee.
Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the owners of the
property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the Community
Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all
of the conditions of this grant.
The Parking Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department.
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is
found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable.
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees
from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to
attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the
applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the
permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If
the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
If tf-
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be
required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant.
Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall
not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition.
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any
development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any
development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions.
The Planning Commission may review this Parking Plan and may amend the subject conditions
or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the
neighborhood resulting from the subject use.
VOTE: AYES: Comms. Perrotti, Schwartz, Chairman Tucker
NOES: None
ABSENT: Comm Merl and Pizer
ABSTAIN: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 98-38 is a true and complete record of the action
taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular
mee ' : of Jul' 98
__A,_
Peter Tucker Chairman
Date -i7 -9P
rs200
Sol Blum nfe d, Secretary
8. CUP 99-4/PARK 99-2 — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND
PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING
RESTAURANT (FAT FACE FENNER'S FISHACK) WITH ON -SALE ALCOHOL
AT 53 PIER AVENUE.
Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request.
Director Blumenfeld stated the applicant is proposing a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for a
restaurant expansion. He noted that the Planning Commission previously approved CUP No. 98-7
to allow live entertainment outdoor dining, extended hours and on -sale alcohol for the site formerly
known as Casablanca Restaurant located in Loreto Plaza. He further noted that Loreto Pla7.a is
comprised of two buildings located at 49 and 53 Pier Avenue connected by pedestrian bridges and
walkways spanning a pedestrian right-of-way which is City owned property. The bridges are
subject to a lease agreement between the building owner and the City which has been in effect for
over 21 years. The previous restaurant enclosed the northerly bridge in 1991. A lease to permit use
of a proposed deck extending over the right of way was not approved by City Council and this
element of CUP 98-7 is no longer in effect.
Director Blumenfeld stated the current plans call for a 1,150 square foot expansion within the
contiguous building extending to the south of the existing restaurant utilizing a shared kitchen but
no thru pedestrian access. The current restaurant will retain the name of Fat Face Fenner's Fishack
and the new restaurant will be called Fat Face Fenner's Falloon. The plans show seating for 32 with
bar seating for 11. This operation is analogous to the previous approval of the former Descanso
Restaurant which was replaced by Pointe 705.
He noted that the the primary issues for the Planning Commission relate to the Parking Plan, as the
CUP is consistent with the General Plan and the zone; however, the replacement of second story
office space with restaurant use is also a policy issue for consideration. The Parking Plan is
proposed to provide remote parking, consider the parking credit applicable to the site, and approve
in -lieu parking for the project.
He further noted that there are no special circumstances applicable to the project which would
permit waiving or reducing the parking requirement under the Parking Plan. This project is located
in the Coastal Zone and must also be approved by Coastal Commission.
The project is located in the Vehicle Parking District which permits remote parking. Remote
parking for the project is proposed for 200 Pier Avenue will only be non -required parking as the
required parking will be satisfied in -lieu pursuant to the applicant's request. The Planning
Commission previously reviewed the parking credit applicable to the property under CUP 98-7 and
found that a 624 square foot banquet facility eliminated as part of the previous restaurant use
resulted in a parking credit of 4 spaces as shown on the Parking Table in the staff report. With the
proposed restaurant expansion, the parking requirement is 3 spaces. These spaces are proposed to
be provided through a contribution to the in -lieu parking program.
P.C. Minutes 5-17-99
Staff is recommending approval of the CUP and the Parking Plan with a contribution to the in -lieu
program to satisfy parking requirements and approval of the remote parking for any supplementary
parking, as the Parking Plan approved for 200 Pier Avenue is only granted for parking after 6:00
p.m. A review of parking conditions related to the restaurant is also suggested six months after
implementation of development permits if the Commission chooses to restricted business operating
hours as a method to satisfy parking requirements.
Director Blumenfeld presented the requirements of the parking plan in the staff report which states
that after 6:00 p.m. daily, the parking can be used as shared parking.
Vice -Chair Perrotti asked if the tenants of 200 Pier Avenue received notice of tonight's meeting.
Director Blumenfeld stated they are not within 300 feet since the remote parking is about 600 feet
away, however, the project site is posted and there was a published notice.
Commissioner Pizer stated there are three parking spaces required and the applicant has outside
dining which requires two more spaces. Director Blumenfeld stated outdoor dining is not the
subject of this application, and that if it is proposed, it will be subject to the same parking
requirements as the restaurant.
Chairman Tucker opened the public hearing.
Gary Vincent, Vice -President, Fat Face Fenner's Fishack, stated when they came forward with this
project, there was no in -lieu parking program in City. Therefore, they leased spaces for availability.
The in -lieu is a long-term solution and because of this, they are interested in this as soon as it is
available. At the next meeting, they plan to bring forward the issue of the bridge. They would like
the remote parking to count as required parking in order to move forward with the project and not
have to deal with the in -lieu program. He further stated that their restaurant is family oriented and
75% of their revenue comes from food sales.
Director Blumenfeld clarified there is an in -lieu program available. The applicant is pointing out
that City Council has indicated they want to revisit this program . It also has to be approved by the
Coastal Commission. Since this may involve a Zone Code text amendment, it could be a lengthy
process.
John Bowler, project consultant, stated they took a five-year lease because the recommendation
made to them was that the lease be at least as long as the lease on the business at five years. He also
stated they have gone out of their way to create additional parking for the general public. They are
requesting to use the lot on the weekends to make the 21 spaces available to the general public
during the day on Saturday and Sunday. Also, the parking is currently operational by Ampco
Parking with valet. When patrons come to their establishment, the parking is validated, but the
other parking pays a fee. Ampco is currently holding seven spaces for availability for Fishack
customers.
Jim Lissner of Hermosa Beach stated the conditions regarding the requirement of the percentage of
food being food are not enforced. He questioned the number of licenses being approved downtown.
Downtown is being intensified with most of the existing establishments lengthening their hours,
4-
3-
P.C. Minutes 5-17-99
adding live entertainment and dancing, and some existing licenses have increased their square
footage. The bar industry is noisy and brings many cars into the City creating air pollution until late
at night. The issue is not parking but the addition of more bars in the area.
Rebuttal
Mr. Bowler stated there is a distinction between bars and restaurants. There is a necessity for
diversity in the downtown area such as restaurants and establishments catering to the adults.
Chairman Tucker closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Pizer stated the remote parking cannot be considered required parking indefinitely,
and as soon as the in lieu parking is approved, the remote parking would no longer be recognized as
required parking.
Commissioner Schwartz suggested that the applicant be given an option of either closing the
restaurant and only operating after 6 p.m. seven days a week, or reducing the area of the restaurant
until the in lieu fee can be agreed upon.
Vice -Chair Perrotti stated Mr. Lissner presented the letters relating to Scotty's and applied them as
relating to Fat Face Fenner's Fishack's application. The authors of the letters may not have felt the
same regarding Fat Face Fenner's Fishack's application. He further stated that in the future, the
businesses of the City will have to utilize more shared parking which is underutilized at certain
hours. He agrees with staff's proposal to use the in lieu parking for the required parking and the
remote parking to be supplemental parking. The daytime hours may need to be limited and some of
the floor plan may need to be restricted.
Chairman Tucker agreed with staff's proposal. He suggested closing the north bridge area during
the day. With the remote parking area, another 21 spots have been added downtown. The applicant
is willing to go with the in lieu parking when it comes back from City Council.
MOTION by Commissioner Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Schwartz to APPROVE CUP 99-
4/PARK 99-2 Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Plan to allow for the expansion of
an existing restaurant (Fat Face Fenner's Fishack) with on -sale alcohol at 53 Pier Avenue with the
conditions of having 3 spaces reserved in the remote parking for the restaurant, reduce occupancy,
and approve remote parking as required parking until a new in lieu parking program is adopted by
the Council.
AYES: Commissioners Perrotti, Schwartz, Pizer, Chairman Tucker
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Ketz
ABSTAIN: None
The Commission took a break at 9:00 p.m.
The Commission reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
ifg
P.C. Minutes 5-17-99
11ORENCE 0. FORDIANI 31
Lawrence 0. Fordiani
590 19th St.
Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254
310-372-1262
Fax 310-379-1042
July 6, 1999
City Council of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254
Re: Fat Face Fenner's Fishback
July 13th, Public Hearing
Dear Council Members:
91042 P.01
Jul. - 1999
CITY
(RECEIVED
Jill 0 1999
G DEPT.
I own a single family residences at 710 Hermosa Ave., which is one block from the
Downtown Bar & Entertainment area. I've been a Hermosa Beach homeowner for the
past 18 years.
I writing to relate my concerns on the proposed expansion of Fat Face Fenner's
Fishback. I feel adding any additional Bar/Restaurant footage will only INTENSIFY the
current NEGATIVE IMPACT on the surrounding residential neighborhoods. My
tenants and neighbors have mentioned about the noise and problems that occur
especially when the bars are closing. Please, for once, think about the people that live
in the surrounding residential neighborhoodslill In conclusion, I ask that you reject the
applicants request.
Yours very truly,
Lawrence 0. Fordiani
Hermosa Beach Homeowner
LET
D. Falkenstien
124 34th Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
City Council of Hermosa Beach
Re: CUP Amendment 99-4 June 29, 1999
I hereby withdraw my support of the appeal of CUP Amendment 99-4.
•
t(,_N_
JUN 3 0 1999
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Although I still feel this is a backdoor way of allowing another new high -impact restaurant/bar consuming office
space on lower Pier Avenue, I feel that the appeal is sufficiently represented and no longer requires my personal
attention.
It is my sincere hope the City Council will seek balance in the area and take the appropriate action in this matter to
resolve the cumulative problems that have plagued our downtown and proven instrumental in driving the Either/Or
Bookstore and Comedy and Magic Club from our downtown business district.
Thank you.
Sincerely, Donley Falkenstien.
RECEIVED
1U1. 0 1 1999
ANNING DEPT.
S
Re: Planning Commission meeting of May 17, 1999, item 8, 53 Pier Ave., the FFFFishack
Following are exerpts from letters about the Scotty's CUP (fr e Scott 's)ile at the Hermosa
Planning Dept.) but which are applicable to the entire downtown
Greenwald, resident and rep. for the Sea Sprite motel: "...we still receive complaints
occasionally. I personally live on 10th Street and sometimes can hear the noise emitting from
Pier Avenue at night." "I am not talking about the normal noise that is on The Strand and beach
at night, but the loud noise that comes from the eating/drinking establishments, especially around
closing time."
Fordiani, homeowner and landlord: "The request would only intensify the negative impact the
bars have on the surrounding residential neighborhoods. My tenants... and neighbors have
mentioned about the noise and problems that occur when the bars are closing. I don't think the
downtown needs any more bars."
Hathaway, resident: "...stroll through the Plaza area on a Friday or Saturday night. In addition
to the crowded bars you will see incredibly long lines.... Many of the patrons... will never see
the inside of the bar before last call, but will spend the entire evening socializing outside. This is
the scene." "The new scene will be on The Strand, outside and all night. Before the increase in
the number of bars and bars with live entertainment in the downtown area, the crowds leaving
after midnight and walking The Strand was acceptable with the exception of Fourth of July
weekend and New Year's Eve. Now, every night is the Fourth and New Year's Eve, beginning
around midnight."
Molony, homeowner: "...it's the noise that their departing inebriated customers make as they
stroll down The Strand at closing time that concerns me. I used to enjoy sleeping in our
bedroom which faces The Strand, however since the changes to Pier Avenue, I have had to move
to a bedroom which faces the alley...."
Randall, homeowner: "I think we are at about a saturation point..."
Lundy, resident and local businessman: "...it gravely concerns me that Hermosa Beach has
become known throughout the South Bay, and even the Los Angeles Area, as a bar town,
attracting individuals who frequently disturb the peace with their public drunkenness, and loud
and unruly behavior on The Strand." "...drunks walking down The Strand stop in front of our
house as it is the first dark area to loiter and continue their drunken revelry. This more often than
not happens around 2 a.m. when the bars close. The individuals usually are proving their own
alcohol at this point." "Sometimes I have had to get up out of bed and simply ask the individuals
to move along, and am usually responded to with derision and profane insults. Other times I
have called the police...." "On one particular occasion all five cars in our parking lot were
vandalized subsequent to the police intervention."
Hunt, homeowner: I have owned and resided at 9xx Strand in Hermosa Beach for over twenty-
five years. During that time I have never opposed any type of building project. For residents
such as myself who would like to achieve a balance between economic prosperity for Hermosa
Beach and some degree of peacefulness in our residential neighborhood I now realize that I have
made a mistake. I should have opposed the over proliferation of alcohol related facilities...."
RECEIVED
End
MAY 1 7 1999
LUM. DEV. DEPT.
^l5T [0.2,0
19//aM.lt
ILL
440.
1101,.11111 :I•.':I'
.40010 01110 0<a ••...004.10.0 •0,0.45,
.040.. eaa40
p4 rla.l,r w :01, r.rn.
a 4,
1 44...4.10.50.4' -5 a mon man, •.-s4.4.4110.at
00..50 pl.rla
. :M teas, el f .nen /row ,4..N, 55- 111140.04
.' 400.4 m SM, d r fa .501 ..lana 1100.4 floe.
re yam*
•
e.. d .ere roan _1040 r p
..5my raw Si/rrr. ranbt
,..410. w IN pr.•... .l ran Isa.a•• Leon. Cale
I.U. EXISTING BUILDINGS
•.:'2 a na,51S'la 4.4. w*..
• ean.rm •'•4••5- sly e1na1�1 r r r rya aa. •••••••••••14
_.151 Po cwre...1M . r P&p. r aneu.ele prop r
a •..per a.J.r 5-• 1414..1• F.• 4•.41 w Om 5-.a. Fa
e. 4444 op a Mer r P w. manor room m 0405*
reure1-A dram, I5 -Ma mbar. ran e.. d„r1w
4 • l -f A•wae r 1.Yra.e.w•r wow*
a w oe .nary r * pearl
741 fR
IT. FIXED OR BUIL I -L4 SLATING.
TABLES. & COUNTERS
are W. 4 W 1-n alma arm or area we ...40.1 r
-Flans,1-r- aFlgr as 54, m neon as or
• rar* r nae•.. a Sena 11211
San 11101A(IIII
1 Tl.ada..•r ...as., 5-:rr.4' Bare nae.
pare 1t4 ,:135.4141
( ss.5In Pepe n 5...040 4 pp... I lura• man et
memos m mopes • Po IT 5y,I0 wars Ir 45- new
be/o,rr Sae ; 1,05NIVI Fr 111.11
1 U Pae peep ler papa s arpr•. a pew r (man
mama ram• sear Raw arm (s1 -/y ••• 1s3r I I ISi
*la** 5-e br a dr Bs m a1 r amp r apes
dor lata Sr Se I1n4101 F•0111.11
WOwe. mpg omega saga sea ran r Ismos aro"
w eb mar a wren ml • pea ppm N raper eta
popper • 4a1 r Ppm .r 041.• ow Rea o.a
✓ ran 5.l *a Mr an am I. dam road mea rl be
l.5-. $545 et mans r es as ran N• be ..m nes
pa IT Is PT Mk Sc 1110540131
DD. SIGNS • IDENTIFICATION
72 Th. • Ina, to ea truswieta
a r ••eoA 5MUY5. e•v s. 44.4. • • r .paY now...
0.4.3. 5--1.r * .sI a (.11. 2s awl a .w(ek51n 'e4.e..
ab 41.•••••••.•••....r.11.4. r5-•.sra Mr 55. 1,.'?,/: •11014•al/fereIII.
e•.. *la ee4 54 amara alar ae *Mr.. ran Imua...5. ,0000.. .1 •..rau141.4.art . n.. a w
0.e. Pet cap) m 11114.44..1
• • arm• more r pry et bawr r an pry*
a• ,,r apmla. ano.4 lee one*
repan an ••re w /ay anaaly.
141. 11115410011
• *my lora .4 ma. p *if mag 0014..
pads Mamma rag IN s. *ram au*
sea. pane► as dd* m. Sly mala.
Ls [I 12403X411
Imldrp s have Mm satsd a anal apnea* r e,
fa.I. mar Marra Sr pasa mer • Ta 14 •
W Wwr *saw an*. l rl. 1.y...ma
✓ oan a Alam aosef
s5- (3I3fls4.$
S
FSM YA,•s4.. apFR 1034.
ASPM 6ESI
WAGTG
fLC[oT4clE
/OVER 1:544 WT C072 Res
PRO Damao,: To,MP.P9�P14p+5 R
(a+Yaral
II Li LI
'SOSO
•1Ea.YQ
ulmrom
loll
-e-
-
1.11•b
'43,21[ 1
-071..•.
9a1T
- a
PLO R
ENLIST
sr-a�
«5-4.
1pdPTORy
11.05.4..a1
On.n 5-1 .e e- ). u, 4 11-
e 11-.. . ea Mar TM masa
me. 0 pepped055.4l'\ L451m .pals a.
popped In ops „ape*d a era* Arae at ran !elan r
eaarabaras a Is.. 11511. are *am coca, 3s1an mIU
W Sere 11100Mal1
e.1••••••• a ,.,l4eI PAA cans ...ON ane 4lmpaaa Wan
1143 .arfln 4 • arm 4r.(e.pe • Seel •amss .111.14
Sanas: _ MOS*.
SLI,. am aro nen . 0.044 a .d dry Pal aosa m
a a••smm Sae 131014s.:)
• lass a.lnrvs 5-,e. al et tar 1 Sr SI
awl be •armrf arena .papa •r••1mamb a. Ga*
B* Sc 11101Nn1A1
b o.ram et babas mal be r.51. a Yrl. e
See 1110140.l211
Pr.mr 5.511 INFO want... •4 be rcape 5 a• a
spam mer. dbapa :one Ora. r• m
parr. TM In *mama .. saes* a4 W a
ram*. •• a rya Sc 111014.1111
a Cod.* 5.1131 8.1.5.3.4111S w1-. Blas w•ar
as rami • In pea dam wsa••s• D54
*WS VW. a 1-n • d 0. 05- 2114' bpm beam sell
D m Os be woad a .1•,a11a d 1140' rave r aapore.
Sc f11054.D4
All Many septa r 5- acm 105 Le a mmle y pA
Cl de aer an a ray •P4e abar. maga Wry •
S4I11 d Orr 5-4 W ger a •.p 4ap•yp •a
ra5••sSane •mel ...5* rrr mea r
stmt. a ne. n5- r 5- .arm 5 WPM l.5 Plpm.rs
S5- : Ill AO. a 11004111
1 Wer .agar reouleaos r parr Se am r spec.
roam I•aI all be one sed all be amapaa be 51.IW
▪ massae•. Sam 11175 S• tomb 11118 S•5 Sp
all M anal .. a 1-a .bona. a. I** d. as
Wl.s rt • as all ass a a as o4 ocrmr • 10.30
4101 ren .p Ole a plat r agar ram sal
pa le n , r r nag Mar/ baa an be tan new at
C1,Pr Ila o a aria el r nem M.1sa1 *no a&
be *parr a • amen an 3wroann .r r •I•••••
abu a r avr f pane n3pp a aeeee 111. a 5-.y
oma 4.51 as 710Sba004
9 Pea app1 sedese 0 Ma loot map 5-W ae wean*
Ona sae*. .Mame at 41mrm anneal arm dor r
▪ arm 001.5 a pa. r • I. arm NA Moir *an
.. Wan. r5- ].Ir. ban Car eae •5-.r be pram
ars.* fleas tee per. b.oe Cane In ad be
craw se syr ma N' above Ye *se reser r. plea
Sc 111014.111
Val I •L111* AN. 4. A *14(0 KAMAN
noorerone Il.a .4.. .441 Ws are se ...an u Ii' Is d•
at pe .1 •rrpl'JW IS s a Ppm lanai 11.4141 TM
-..: .... wow. epee a .
,Sononiwi W 5-..l .w a gone. Ler lbw
.. peas .nae '.- . n m. ee panda ran pee
•1.004.41.0141 ..ere 0505 :101.41,1. 5- lieifeele4AI t.o111-
•••I
• op nor peeps,. up. a .a leg. ea roans rows nr4lr
. +. pm «5103
peep pre.o.4.1 -ora 11135 If , a ca flew 5 mama toe.
•ae a an osen or aeons waw ae511
1 .c
, 444 d .an 0x0. *sena •ra•erae *rases 1451 be
11115 S5- ' I1101Ns11Da
11Y5A1b.B1 /m 119 -SA
I he pets map ter PrOas(P lute . III *woe oe le•
apace del' a.en..e r • T-ayd apm
Sc I I IOIAaJI 11 116121.14111
1 TM ouppege ca.ra meas. M • .trk*51 P 3.I at*
445 all a r' .Mn a abaarY. I• M' S are
ark r 41' r 5-r .sfl r nes. * • Si 1000 m' •
orb Fr 1161E
:5051..•44.51.51 .. loe Mer onaa.b3 pease awl * I.
• per 121' ••.Im51g*t1 and M• cab as e.
Se 1)1054311 515 111-10
IM 0.0444 a 15- lar 105 .4baMarn r pme n*'
!C:4. TM Prep le. Ion* raan re II' If Pe rep 15..03
pato. •rmedeorutuee. 1W and ea.* es as 5005
Ftp. I ILI(A3 See 51101340[1
m If as can law ape.* purl yon* by pros. w.
.tar. a rear bags r* Ira Yard all a S." r
yaw 515 ams 041 be la* r Oen r Ram as awe
• Flap 111.511(41• 0.1 Dar r* 1114.14111.4• r aba,ma
i 1d..1rrcica all be • ann an Farm 1111-1[Psl
Sc :1103M440I
wig .T
In
"SI -
MMODIFIC'A I IONS '1'O F'.F'.F.F.
I ORETO PLAZA
5..3 PIER AVENUE
HERMOSA, CA 90254
2
REVISIONS
S. 1.41.44 ILLS
.l'1 05.0366e14.Y1.01 .0•10.41441n.
IgIIY .all 4 W+-•
n,4 a•n•me .. ..5-(..M w. 141. '4
PPP.. .n Sew d Pe ..ergs .w a 4a. a s•o e'
ylrr M sa51w pie Poo 11' ova tee..,
a. 4»m
Net III05A1.,I.11., F.. 115-1• B a..
•^.a ra‘CP1 a .M1lare waspa r5-
0.40.0.
el l I' ...t s a) M m up..
150 . 0541411C:l,) Fr. 1141 •
• TM..w•sla.aw WON l'PP.5515 n ..
.pee.A.
l -
ap POI mem VW -
II yr a .0003 ,..
..n prpe. 40,1% *I. I-. .
544 sow r110)4bxJa1 Fr IIS -Il.
and
saga r_n5 rage. wpm Dom tat a
.rot, . 1•rer.
eam( e05r
•es.0 ye foJosy 45-(
ue !1 I.15.NJCrrear1
• berms mw. m • pm W a es warp 5. a moo.,
1•^•••s arra la r •arae :f . 150.4 el.
1.1 to lass ane re *were mea les mumsi cf ane pa:
anew ran ,w :wlAaea,:...,4.
.• pea s . sea to Ow
2.N.tpa.e.•.....4 b oar Maya v arab Ier
m. o. of . +aw.M mea a a new.. a ss. II
c Saar lone ass r I•.e.I a Learg r,+. ba 0.1
.d•rs1 r a t"114, pee r w W s •m a 0a.r.e
MAIM Ie. d gram a 45.51 w may *ow 505
Ararat aria. .1rr15 W a Anal 41•..We nem
Ss (1103Mb11C(.1e1
a Tads as nes a a lam by • dorasom lane N•
.5 r
230 p. Ida am *am Mn e
ml.rrm d. 1500 pa a as r a* r *lam.
era* W oases a amp r Sep la wan
k f1l0S40114*Il
s (i5- as 5-r m rouse oda. aar Cap
Sc-1103MUC(w31
s 4 W 1-W4 r.Aa or Geer m/meryas.4,cOIM 151
So Any Pap w 5050 nm,. (dee man a.• .
roues el 1i' Sc ;IIMAISUCI..)I
L HAZARDS • PROTRLTIL1G OIJECTS
1 •aroma anon r .•s. Dep beam • spas want r ea
allecaaf an. w ..1.o, aoaey •' . pod than...&
• pares er .00...11 lar • • Mata. I ob.
....teak or mew pe4ear ..M. *51 M abelar 1 41
. as pal•al•1 •len. a' • Mae an ea .4s 1t aro.
wrlaa tl M. dr d • pom11 bm .R
v 11/13141
Mai • paid an Moira . pa* a as 5-.0 •,.pal.
.r• 514.41 • Amain 5-.a. r I' an a sena of
5-.W at tial rya es 3 pa* la arises
.lame *al ran Sc 1352341 Fy 11H101
Oboes preanag k5- Ira a. levy .5• Lflna Ir
✓ Ir Pwa bawl Os Pel ran. a manna' a
.rLL ISIS. 54041.1. pa•m5171 at 4W
S. 13101401111 Fes 11115
a Dbea ...I a Oaf ram 5-M• a e Ma. 27 Pan r
MOW /m a sorer w 5-.a. r5- 514/• 1111., nobban
parmae ys an ret Sc 710540011 Fr 1141A
5 name* &pe •0maa s... p/m 05 .• 3..5 I l'
• men 2r 5 Sr rale r p*r an firer Bra
S. 111)5.40911
• Fame NIm all a.* *a .a0 d ., aem*
m s •5-.+m mat Sc 1'10194114
W W5- WO eon* peep•*• an a •r aroa••m
apo 5-Y ha Ir naaam rase r yea
5.a .31M.3k11). Fr 1161A
I Mapnea= r.14.a Pe 4.1•41. •arm
*MO Oast '.'lame *•• an monad km a*. d a
40ss. Ss 43I150114p 11421
a *1a.• any saw. es r Felt re a .4.5*..taw
4.ear.beara r*.W4•.yemo. bane. 501 I sou.
*•w moa a r le pawn a i.w.rr.y ,:.gaga r
*/spa
S. ;111(011.
250 man sea.*
..t ne leas.
MO
OSOOMTON
551ARWO Mm5*
/ U SANITARY FACILITIES(GENERAL,
a. ,l, ..,M1 or... ail ...Pp /reaps w Meow arrow
I..5- •ra..a w n1.. .a 11mewaael
..▪ .1.1100. Iw.:..ca ane re 1410.114441 m1110 ace.. m Fro
re ...MI be 0:442511.1
M 11105.14111
tear.050.x. art per• `I1- mapa
oloato. p. el
I.o, .5F.••,a fu.0ut. 1 alar 105 pore .e
.1.4444. 55-0 54*doe While Pep(acn*5 rem•.s
1 I
n orveg .o plea .4flsat r prom) mp,s. 31-4. can le
...el. for per* Fa/ **Jars
rs
Set II IUSA/011M
Where fr•1a re e M r 504117 y e.rf a5ra a .1100'
5epr a) r rmr r man a, aaIMM ars
Sc (110SM1111
I Dosses meso a neat ma.y pas ala ....I,
w .meow saga Ir' arm p• Pia Ir I••1 at vasa
..5-.r W.. Wl..ai P..ry hdam awl Ito5-FY•
:nig (r mel as IF' a** 5. 11105A(111101-
•
1105.4(111101.
• ilea yawn Maw all be leaner by a epee !WIMP. Ir
dew.. one • 4(0• arm mom', 0111__.1 mas mar c
.5155. Il•Moa. See (1105.4111101.
a e.walc 4.415 4 *on 500411 m 54s5
or *no ea r- • •rpm .1.7 .. mm 5-w roma
all a 04110d1y adb.I 0.51 a mer..oar* eft*
Se( '1110SMIIDI
.5 MULTIPLE AC COMMa10A 11014
SANITAKS' FACILITIES
.••15. 5• 1.40,014rn anon 1 Ar •nada
.4405m.m
• e. eat ( 11 44 u ra1a
a...enter.
Lc 1111/man 000.8 pas Ars... Ars. Ips new'
"ear ate 51.0044011 a flax 14 M.pdr• wen
los. .Y a wary Gcom. rase II nada on re ream
...an .554 as a al 1-•.a spa r' y SY
al a an r para. (..a3Yr a•aaslarl Dan .m
. 4e a.ra area oven am m as pr.s1
m. mere.• eue •ran y 5- era 4444115'
Sec (110SNIUN111 Fr 111.10
A owe bear WM.1.5
. Fem s Yea pace
ran II' *r5- dam al. em • Cap or • saw 12'
.a ea am ion all • one a d as 1-a cpm Ther
nes ei ..rp .*s all a5,5 IT Ba a .maim its.
am am•. oda Wan 1- at paw r am r
r.. won S5- !1105Ap1W,11FiS Mil
1 Aa a.. P. as l5- Spa am41 be psoas:a1 as
..rr.a• a a mammal d r...4505 4m elan..
Sar Malawi • mama 40' Mg Oar gmm was be part••
a Bend a5 *5-0554 Sao** Ns rag load•
IS. r5- Gra be, rl an pep+ lar, a l' 054 r ca
asm Set DIOSAISIM(1i11 Fr I ILIA a B.
4 Wspa,_1110..*Sl I.••••••/ 05- a ow rb••
..5-...4. .r r .1.11 Mn a car. araea
ar allp 5-r d 1r M In n . .. as N'.bm ram
•. r Aa nes pore ampds*sen as
clo l mom
Se (1101MI4.ia1 Fp11/-IA*l
5 When sada neaps*. Oma an Int. as • . • w
Om* M fee... mama r • sashay 51.0
nor I5•new Sp • Mahal • Slur 1404311 ane
.p.a.a Set D103A01144a1.
1: 141.4.14., M. - as spam .release
pear. • an y, r bean as .wan pa1.w•
Sc 110.1.3111,141x•.
11 Ida* 1,0540554 :..rem • 4150 mel be u*
Sows I • 15. 0.5 et purl w 0455 0r
050 4 Se 13+ 051.51 15- 111031 11511
.I y5W s , 0,01 4.1.004114•14 w Poop s art IW SI a
Ms k.0 s awl aM•1-m a done d Bow w.,
a•r an 1.1.e ep0S.44 a a.aa.fl d dos pr. 44
IS' m erneaee • 115* moat• 5- Flan of r bar a W cb.d
Pane Sec .110311.211 Fp 11414
IS leeerawe A ne se r.aem.Inm 5-e pp peep .Ir
a54• rope II' pro rete pee el .war M Posner
0arsr appro. el Irm Pe tae rp.peep doers
4 0108/1011 1m 11424
111 Tl. sae s •any Y.b bean moa mm A' Ism 135
Inaba •aura. Sc .230441 1111 Fr 1141:
11 Ta 5-r para M **a w.. OFarp r • reY.le
pp. ran an amp.•• w as. WON pn•.1•Mama.
ds d*r rpm fen 5an.4mr ammo s d amble. .a
a am. mama a • .541.4•0 *pen 51510.114
maw
...rano ..mr m.=•• men S• tam 11410411 far
limp •..... 5:, (DOM .11201
IF Ma*. PT el of 4ms gone rrtlmc arias 5-r ban
4 r5- 00..110. aim Mo. 1-m • mar Ir•
.15_s Honarrm as • mi an Warm twaama.
Why mar baa avers a gal • IP bob rrr - *51
ha anaaa on or n5- a of r r .Mf .11 rber
If lama moan ea.a be •smeary 51.52 as peva
mamma s5- mama 4T
5 1110111431 Fr 11135
10 *ma Nana • nnr are nal s 10441.1/I p.n. a
maw ran) r I pas M Mar a d. r5- poll Or pro
abalone mad • 5* spa• lima ions.. •a.cam
paadasamr Yam arm Csq maMms =mom
nes moan a w alal • ma as PIs ares W r
a as mmina a rana dad. mor a am a
l. small 811 a - llaWd• by r 01111440
••.••••.warp, rasa. IS pima
Sc ,2104(1.2111
I. SANITARY PAC/ ITT
FUTURES • ACCESSORIES
1 Ta MS. a mar .a nem nes r• roam d Iran
Aram d Ir .roan. as m a s mar= bob rya
a mar r rpm *r M Flora am • &memo 00.44
a seam Mas r lag am 0' bap Ses (11011
2 • sea saapslr y a. la apa.rin 0=41•reme.
• 451. • MP. mama 31.b .a law rm . all aka e
..nap saesble ool_ ma w W.. m sat
a.* . legoen
r 1210IM OMIDI Fis 1161/
1 11.PON% 5.144 r a .r •.l •• m.wc9 .151 • sears.
as* d 11'...rlm of we Man
Sc 11)0041 Fr 1111.01
4 1.41.0.201 .41 M more.._ a hen an u.n•• 145....
Maar. le n...5- lar Raw.. .e •cla .
ra
05 .
Ira 40 we rep sr
ea w r p.. woo
-Mena. ran Ow len ta. e.ee.l a me.. 50 5- s
nem -Nona.. ce.•rma• T. ...Ana. Md be l 1401
.1 Y a 0.1 M• ow... 4I r ma Na a. IIP, a•
mals at Ir. as 5.. a 1. el . 151 5S
Sae ISw..1
/. Tr sae ...yeas .1114 mm omm ran Oa * MM.
mit • laps U4*3.od mal. r• 45v as . al Ta
IRO Y be ha* sat lhrs. r=v bora M a,. •
O a r am or rat Sc (110SM13AI.II
1 E•eal M am as assn .. Yr 4••. 1 say
,aMaacaa 5-.m m a ass a• ad M Feral be on. 1
cr54 m555nrar 511.4 M r A 55151-a Maas
to 511 aaMmly • bra .1.s e•r rmprm am W
Oa a r bl• as rand o 3055155kr neaara4m
.1_n 110 0
Sc [1013)240m1I Fy IIDIl
I W►5n m ea an ane a anal .5-5 4 mnar f
oreora •s arm .e • blame •Sema. a**
543 meant anon • a4 r aaa* r * be anae1
..n •.a afar Ana a *.aa masa rs,...r roe..
arra op Ion IFIyy A Lome 1111111 may
1111104 Sc 1510131141.11
IP
CONTROLS a OPERATING MECHANISMS
I C ossa .. Mer./ lama•.. Io.,. P M emna It
Spa 101.11 1.10 al em•ly s. dee.ar=m d Spa I l
Sc (110040011
2 Ow floor pep 1w.a5.I wan Lor 11110 4 Y Ara • 11
Ica. a par* 511.0 by a pea .•m{ t waSWww *15
pard • mall dorneen ray.pla ad ban epamr
m•1...* Sc 1/1034021 13
1 Tapas meals Pa ef SI Baan .amp• rSpalm r
41110 arab aurorae •& be dem .040 M' of r Ile., b5
r. wry 1•p I5• .f foment alae... w .,Si S•' neo a
Ina al r.r.a spa.. Sc :11034001)
p
a -S*30r14554* Marr as 5-15psembk sa4ta.t..
anewrnem le PPP
.4Fa.le.L St.,p r1-.
Tr Pore m,..aaa•a maw SWlMrpes ams
prase d gran s5-. 7Ios40Ml
•y I IS
F, CLEAR
n i SPACE
,.5-..1.
cgs
AB men
oaar••••O•M •a=O.N
rl
eV`
•
Ile .m 4 *m pm •cava rap 45500.._.4 w
. .r r wMr..w 1450 floe al be r as. or sae ••
od* baa In rears Sa 11103/11
When ram as pads" *a al ave a rats mer page
10• y 4r O 0o el re rood •Yana Mom apnea.
Sc (11r540114131
WM. or 5-r baa 5-r& r prowled • M1 or ..5-e • no
plwoma 5.555 aid -Ben r sea ....•••.adl`
O•.m a B•mr The. l. pow Sc 1 (1105.11
Cana* .scam Ma. ,avera4a neva e a oble
labeaneal s5- ;1102)
Ws •••••••• ...Ow .al.• cep... r nes rmem.
••aa= Oman all be arable was am 514
Mao ••••••••• maim s mood dr mm .. .1-a
sora a ma lam' Sew r flew
Ss 11101.13030.41103111.
TM nem mom re maw are dna r 5mr far .rye
awls.. dos or mama ram Dwain MOM r
as 011.5 W
Se: (1101110101* 1103.1.
Swa=p is. e*nd dem a rr.m deo Moo man•
m• 10 mom Sc X130351
Mina ail be nnelr.ae as maw mom baba is 40'
Ms a Om. Se (11000034.14
Mar ma Maas 11.1‘.11.•••• impala.. ear mar
Mpar a as appal Sam a panda.. r a a •a
Hype MS Ir• lm. M a m4nr In mem a 55-
.am Ir sm. Mara la
Sc [1013311
To. or aml, ma c ham 3..51 .15. or d a
Ism sop a* rear a rrha r IT km. Ear
Dqr• a .mal wary or r r m per warms
per Mall ramal
Ss 11105.40317 015 1141..
Tr m dor• ss art • mom band magma e1•r.
W e ream ram mom mac Ye an.r mamma
mama Iba 5- ma* am a .a. a Ina 5' 5-'l%
Ian mm cam mama ..m4 wrmb5 24' a. lam
.. Ma d.ris r be s.arlp rrr.• MM. a VT al
00111rMama mesa r mamas •••• . smarm n&
be a pps tact 1• a .nano Nary gars
Sc 111014331
wOS3•••a0 •4a00v
r
1.1• WO 1 e• VIIMOM
O*a*1.MM.LR•.
•1
051.e,4011.*1••am014a
E WLKS I SIDEWALKS
• GENERAL _NOTES
.. al MM a 3,00000 mat area. r
44.1.940.1. one ne w -.,ars • span among ea r e
tall be. pompon o. r era
Se ':1:5•,I f1, 111.171..
.1,m •enw aeras e a le.el rot eecs-.wpm on art
rM
re r .r • rep se peel r 1 1. page a O•r .nap
101 any 14 ••' m yen..
en ;1113011 FO IILS4.o*I11
5109545351
:41' 1115511 0
11 5pr(a
11 ) a51 0114140 elym( -
(4501..1-0 a eea.•rm b ant romp
sae 11111411
• .
,ram u yews r a 0....r d ane d r. s5- ssea•
10 1515455 4 all .map as as *ma et
Sopa 1007 r. pada* nap Sen 1111101
1 W... Sae* mea m owe* r •aa w- par fa
ova... the ram mart Cas as* r rel madams
0=5 OS* Wa1114141.1•4 Mit nem Open..
M
DOWN. of A'ar: 5 - Pam= agar10
Sc 111234/1
a Wbl. 55143. Sew M a llMr. *an 40' by 10'•
a ea.yar •..4114 aro a.rrL a s a me N•
.151 - amp• ear 5 gag r amp in. Inn Ile.
.at.5a 0153411.
4,41k4 Pill gear • lama. of 24- r as ale d 5, man nep
a/a rra yr a atm same or man
0000 ._ 000_0. .......-
keen • moss, e! a 145 a•5-/ MO
5*
[mom
I W.I., r ear. anera *S W •4 '. • Met
Ss 7124141
• Surber we• aped a as r5- maim MI a a as
• lap4rmw • ragar a manias sail Baa
• 1st. w• lap d• 1• r5-. Yy•b/.amm
10 Wad .15,1.., r pekes a p, OA l a d aaam
maim par Fe amp rear a rasp am atm
rm nemV eparpr 7110SA,•."1•1:13.17111::171
' Isa*14,51 I/ amasi 0051 mplat r5-Aa54. r.lataI..ma dI••efSe 5111
N. ENI7RANCESM EXITS
• .1(S . Lm meaner•••••• .ala4.05..:44:,..14
., a. 151 ran r5- wa.e
.. r
•.r., ow., r w are w oarar
e•.... bpv owl:.1-•..w ire...41'11
See .1101,6.:
o...O.Ovef ow v 1-a. on I.4 en .. .1100. aeonr
I Al anew r Y. alma Dar r a ems• bays
Iberian ane 5-a•. mem•• s imam ween Maim
[101011)
p 1..01•.5 ran an a W ane • a aqua. Maar Om mom
.r Marra. Sc 11103001
1 Dar. posh M pawl or mar ata Aye • 5-3.1. a
modals r Is pram ams 5-S 5 amain • as manly
arms a Mamas S5- (7101)841)
I (N dome .m5r M op5ale Ben a &made alt a =. a Ma
or o war MOom s el Nan Sc 112035)
I Mary apes asp or 5S4_ .aa Sr War gam
ma a (550555 W. ane am an r a pap.. masa
mor Nab MW a Oval a 5-r l•i yet a aomrae
flab b.4 nal an to ram • moaam,_l yam• To
aahSly.5-1 140 ■s r mi.. ppm r r mv.
Sc 11104(0.1
0
Lamas r Pens nes an a lam =PPP ..mak a •
• 95•.4 034, 1-1 be mama as • ma it y S. an.
4.000 p e ea. r1a1►5a4 maim seam * r Imam
.tan.. • fr. M.. .sole Was s. 5-•y r pop a
arras •••••••- Lrr s ass 114 ane•oma• 4m
44.1.ma Sc (311411
De r 5-...1. 40411 a .•
reel m OM mm roan-
none a . a Mar 01.01 mama r ley
.mama bee combo or mom r y5- r am la.. ran
(Mbra. et 1.10E Oa( bel Oral. parr•I5- dYr
=
\mors a a c m. _' ram MOM ••••mana
r d54naw e.• •nem or ram Oa am rpm
tanw41 a am 5-r err .ray alar oma
14. 1/103111
• llaaa•w m army Wasp ams r..mIa 5-..m or
a r' One r far 5s 131140.1)1
9 Ear. A.A.. bea r warm a,ar a amara pa . near
aaW M.4• 05-5• pm r smarm d• 4s a Om
1' is rook r palm b -I' n aeba wan Irba or
aam, pts Is anal of .pas r a. r era da a
o a a as 12'. mama 5-.m IN Ma ane dm aa.
spam 4
Sc ' I110s••• 011 Fr 11631
a 11411
IU *man• pa A J4.es.5 .14. r oaa ad. am PPI
pe.a • Ow. a5sa.xr pomp) ea 412' .a r at
p•.e..r 45.4040:11. deems ka • em peer
S. ()103401
I1 Wr
an aces. at mane 4 anal • as 00,et
Sem amu m d a In all pa. • aa. _aar
aer. sem of 12• ram r war parr • • are . /0
5-r as Ba es cam pre
4 1110131
tMa•••.aa. A...O...L
wawa. site . A•ISOVAL
3
4
5 E
9
10 11
• 24''5.
0(
[f. :a .�ae; C(Ca'K OES•'11 :'•51501211 4 .
-•.• -• _1 405[ • 5.( .«054•: .,. a. -f..,11 -.
-(Se .Slhller '5 1.(
11[c,w•�..5.r•S' 'sE •M1.A .{ •~1f..:: roe.. r.
• 00[11, 1.. A1.-.5an '1.1a. of 5.,A::EL :n.5- ,(•(1A.«•In1-^
S 14.400E 50 tintR,a10171 • (5(35 4,4 a.,
•5G 4•
`1 W1 .1(SL LOC•iC moo o•E S(RK •0.
0 . ate 10.5 S.MBC .5 •1..4 C1-' •...11.
O .51(1.525• 500.[05(3 5.05 M( •C14 DIMEMYiI. ,
: 1.11144: 1 1h. w% 5110 5^01.12 80 1(afro 0(1 40
. 15 114 a .1 15(10 '4 • DSC.(••MC.e 1UTtL(M Mf .i4M
1-
1..5 • a(45LW 5.141151 11•Ou ..l 11,51((,1
•15(51.11 I a 4(SO1u14104 405.4K Pa11C((DelG 0515 INC *Cal.
a L3CJI.SS•v St'R1•CCS :ea • N c n
!•1~021 .--14 NS.4_4fJ5
0[444 •e- a. 5.,1..21 441 ]C0.5 3Vr\G :5( COs,, it .1-aw•.
51•(5 p.,_1-.. Pl3.;E
1015
((: 4.00 ..i 0- MD (11.15-4 :a •.• ..
'••51(,14(,1. c Petr. C M F.tO#•C 51
'.:-'•wiO r
R( .:..C5 .1 5(10(0!w.MS v«.a.1G
:1(410.5.0 GAPED 0• TK C03501Cr 011(01a0s1S ..1(444 5.4 •.1
1ws..EO •014 4A. real COPPL, ■5M SIC fail.006.1•
:OM O1 •(t1.M•
•non • or1110(0 Of IIawG .5.o SPICY no, ..•
'.0(54(0 .Dl. S004.1 K SISSTRO 50 ale •PFUKD le 055P.
O (00er( P0C((1aaG .M M 1120'
.) An. N(5. COMGA R ran 011(TS Sari. K 411(5.10(4 POP S I • C A •
'[110410,45 5Ja SOS•1( ■ES51a••T' OI 05110 Par.YMlOA4
ra0 .-0001. M-SOPCISmVT MSI. P(ST0MM5 S+STE.' Sam Fall
no Car.,S 0.211
• 11 am •..0 011(145 Sa4L K 41040(0 .M CC0PL1•K( e _
1.3041105 AMO MGIAcTasS *(FEP(MCEO O5 4002!1 COK• SKi'
142 vKe .:y.S,Af Cala0.:5 1.v
• ••511.•, -004.. ,.CIES •atrO•11 To S•/fl - :at rat,. • -.
5-.L.. I•...1 a( 111(0 5(1(.7.
• .. • .. . 1 , •w Aln(a «i114,:..a, w . ,..ere. a).. a
TITLE 7.1 - DISABLED ACCESS
COMMERCIAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
•[*tna 1..0 M 11.145
A. SITE DEVELOMOMS
ACCESSIBLE SODTB OP TRAVEL
'OTT yr..s* Aar a ]'MK • 61A.. or 1 :ew.aae
.4esa and r e eameas l aa•r no* r arm• se a
a_5- w1u.r r sena aI(a be.gar y• war
M • oat*oat*ems• robe**•robe**.pry
w Para err rep sorrow'
1 i.e .M.•ms r 'Nome flu M &nom r 110.1* Wan r
&•nem*• r rannem.. Mot dal ramr las
Fad w-, r ..a mow, • Moa.* moa. POI
mama muse= rope an map. M
San .110140411
1 Wan man r a swam a ran • Maar a • mer.
mama .a.5m.5 arm per New= brlaay r
ma.* r dor• Sr (110040.11
I Tl. am* 140 d rra0asra. ma paapl Ma ram
boar. ••••••• Ial•y masa alar 5-r imam ad
••••••• moms r. m Is ' (1105441
a AI PM s aa•NW l was al. am sIo umrsa
anew tom p.m mamma soft roma. pray AN
ammonia - say ma. ..pas ane s .mods.
a rmrr rare mar Om ma 2l. 3mmbo .r
as. ammamos baba Imo* IranlamMa
smr Paan. s5- (11019(1)21
•b • tamp a mad • •mlw.r r Manna s M A. .ala
to Ira. a ammo IS a.ai MI a imam s rl
pmt_ d r m••••• P mama Many mea a
low at . arm as palmy
>s :3 IONIA
• Al lea a comer as. Mil MEN. •tm5r dram r
sa•[0•.mr a• SI MOW. Wean /5-••r as a s
a l so a mb a smalls ram m• oars
\3011 s
Rolm (110540021
Al aeras leS ma Mora •Moor 5pnrda moms d
N s eat* imam r ear w mor ad ran spas
✓ Sulam an a', r s1me name a
Ss 15.434 5).
t
Imp par} mar. Maas p a mama 151 a
o wl roll m F1 rr.e5 lea* In m. ammo.
154. an nr Oa* nem 4e mad mpm•
San 110144111)
c
Was ea la ams W a•. 411015421 slenrra
mor. ;1112401)21
IlECEIVE®
MAY 04 '099
OM. DLV. DEPT.
PLOT PLAN, GENE}:AL NOTES & D.A. NOTES
13
4
14
Is
•
S
•
2
3 1 4 1 e i 7 1 1
9
{ T 10 11 12 I 13 1 14 1 15
••{
44-4.Alt
LCT Age -0.; "30* 415 = 2 $7D, av x 2 = 5i7ca so;• T t_.rt7tV llyl
t'J•1IL IL tt /ate 2/co.5F Vag_ I.aT-
U
GcLISITLut 1101-$ T-tl°G t 4.. J - oe/0y�►�+G`f 11#4
1 'P7
[7V7 Gsfip)
Go -KT. WM.
(E) (t'M• 1.I.+t
CA1.51.11-46( Yle`>fAa►ZnuT7,F. ••1,400.0
�p
f a orn 5xX7 11 -L -5 -2.0.2.40 -Tr 47.119 =
(1o� D
IK f6•
_/*
2
e,c1S- L•tb,
2e9-tauf2A14T
c
(E,c.^1L. wA L'- \
r?� )roL .1 N •111. Tu
1clno
Znaey��2,7 e xglT -1r
_ .L2 S . �Z
■
..-AO0MP-1,1u
to
C--> 311L�ICI 4U .6srr--Z
-
T,.cN �
M
1)
.41
L-',1-1'31"L1ii 1.15.1-ri -10 ACC.-
O
.c -,t11:42
yRLt\
z OCT 0.Yrp,
C -111yxTYlu'Ul. •,- -, 1t( R.,15 -TI
5- - , imp -1
Str,P5
IIr1
OP T,P.
wirocrcwT
4pwr,l Ii,) f .1 1p
A 11TV}4
n� rr I Lr7->t.o rIcti
5t:G1e. (4e.
& 1rtt,zr )
11 -Mg I ii 11G-1
tete; 1 g.43,04, L.41 AREA.
Ex ppp..-Z iWI..fte To .3C
T;NG 01,0414.114vy NC 41N--4 aEX�
pf-,. il,vlc
LI
.�SLL r..sor If'!s uILlAlbl Gor. TD I amounts 0,1^4 P. V. 1•rry.
4�. .k EI.EL..m46 ,Iht HIS'C1 C-IOE P bN,eTc.•YO PSE CVSl1•A!'5u.LO
31. '1" QIyG
144#0.,a0
;TE, 1j1tTlc
"t".071- 64.4strwaro-t*Ite4
.._ WAD-
I
0
a1
J�r:ua �� cult
.
I
11 f w�l.u, uta'
41X1114).1
��
I
41.111/41 I
;QnJ1EP.
uuFF
‘,/ 1,F
--�i
.I I
PZW7, J)
0 Lt6r.ET
_ ZiLlbl ,NIrK1lgU61
'1'4•
:6"/
T
Y�1�1
--.N" 4et�'C
I
3"
J
j;f;:
7 1L ,..,
s ^ t -i'
oI
4.08,..4 to.EA
�'
1.04
S Le1Tp.1
7 AIR- 111.1
-.Lc
(N s 1Ea+oRxrer1tou cam" fLe G(")%2:* 01C`--er?
EKr lL t F.Id1WiE) 71�f"wo r
'STUD., b1f
1,daA 1J/i-II •. 2
•- 60-41)
Ft u2A (j� I -rr I wiuL . At -Es ) - w 02-.1,. L c tJ:4 EV TJI
c - 1:t. Pmt Li:v./
F Y rXI LJG GLIdRn OA.I1.
11 t t 1
11
r
1.4
J19ni wv.v1/41.4.1,
NI•
MODIFICATIONS TO F.F.F.F.
•! LORETO PLAZA
5 ; 53 PIER AVENUE
' HERMOSA. ('A 91125.1
f
r
r
REVISIONS
l
5....,.4 .t (ASI
7 0
,Ib
OVERAI.1. SF('ONI) FLOOR PLAN.
ENLARGED PARTIAL SE( -OND FLOOR PLAN
& DETAILS
•
pwrwp nl._.s
Ace
�, HAPPY NUR PROM.
loN -Fri
ILL PINTS S2
u APPETIZERS o OFF
-="44,,FISHACK TUESDAt:
PINT OF SAY ADMAn & ORDER OF C[
• $1O 95UMEOPIc $2",;
•
July 15, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of
The Hermosa Beach City Council
•
Regular Meeting of
July 13, 1999
MILLENNIUM WALKWAY LOCATION
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve the sidewalk 011 le Street at the Strand as the
location for the Millenium Walkway (Attachment A).
Background
Council approved a program for the Millenium Celebration that included the sale of
engraved bricks for $100 each to raise the funds to pay for our celebration (Attachment
C). Brick and engraving costs for each brick total $14.50.
To date, 242 bricks have been sold and staff has received an enthusiastic response from
the community to the fundraiser. We set the maximum number of bricks at 2,000 and
anticipate that at least 500-1,000 will be sold by the deadline (to order bricks for
inclusion in the January 1, 2,000 dedication) of October 1, 1999.
Analysis
Commissioner Kuh provided two alternative plans (Attachment B) including (a) trim for
the decomposed granite walkways adjacent to the walls at the entry to Noble Park, and
(b) a wall (could be located on the southern edge of Noble Park).
While the wall is an attractive alternative, with the primary objective of maximizing the
fundraising potential of the program, it was deemed too costly. Next, due to restrictions
placed on Noble Park from the ballot initiative, staff wished to avoid locating the bricks
in the Park itself. Unfortunately, this means that neither of the fine concepts submitted
by Kuh is recommended for approval.
Instead, the walkway will be a simple linear path, replacing the existing sidewalk as
required to accommodate the number of bricks sold. Once Council approves the location,
staff can work with Commissioner Kuh to select the brick color and to determine the
dimensions of the walkway.
Other alternatives available to Council include:
1. Place bricks on the existing seating wall at Noble Park.
2. Select an alternative concept and/or location for the wall.
Fiscal Impact: None.
All funds raised from brick sales in excess of engraving and installation costs will be
dedicated to the Hermosa Beach 2000 Millenium Celebration.
Attachment A: Proposed location for the Walkway.
Attachment B: Millennium Walkway and Wall concepts.
Attachment C: Millenium Walkway program flyer.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dir- ctor, Community Resources
Concu
Stephe
City M
urrell
nager
Millennium Walkway Location
14th Street /Strand
•
•
PAVER INSTALLATION O CONCRETE EDGE
I' bola!, ictpow
Vftoepeeed rile Pit
I/ it V feecTeto ed2e reelrelt
W NIrobs. —..
PAVER INSTALLATION ® D.O. PATH EDGE
&hes totalled p.rymakWar•
SO Not roll
dieting d.eanpo..d 9•a Nb path
t3rtcks totalled
to Saud pat g
LI
uuuuuuumuuuunuuuuuunuuuuuuuuuuuuuli13
u u uuulluu un ill lnuu11111111uuuuuuul
/ DETA; L I
So.l.: 1/4" o 1.-0"
u uu
—
1k. I J.IWUN t.Wr`
a❑uuuu—
BTR,P+ID -�
DETAIL'3
Not to motels ..
/
DETAIL 2
So.l.9 1/4" o 1•-O"
=Yo. �.d trick. at .d. .5 --� ,. —
Nh ember of Old* /
1 S.. d.tall w. 7, bp.
/
•
t'bt.I.n hick• NW
S.t detail no. t. hp.
S.o detail no. 5, hp
t1o61U1'Ict t7 ISL cork -err
•-The Strand-,
PLA N
Scala.: 1" to 1O•
REVISIONS
N0. DATE
DRAM 9M Tx 5/33/99
AXIOM DC9GN 9T: T.R. 3/33/99
CKCAED 9T: TJL. s/33/99
MILLENIUM WALK
C1119nC. N.•+Aw AMA,
90: n/
RIOT TIL:: 25.38.IQPC3
SCALA IID
City of Hermosa Beach
PROJECT NU►IER
SlEETN .
I
•
i
As part of our Hermosa Beach 2000 Celebration, City Council will dedicate a walkway on Noble Park
(adjacent to the Strand at 14th St.) on January 1, 2000. The walkway will contain up to 2,000 personalized
bricks engraved with donor's choice of name(s). Proceeds from the sale of the bricks will help pay for the
Hermosa Beach 2000 program and celebration—any remaining funds will be distributed to Hermosa Beach
charities.
> Bricks are $100 each
> Maximum of 15 characters per line (spaces and punctuation count as a character)
> Maximum of 3 lines per brick, all capital letters are used (no upper/lower case letters)
Yes! I want to contribute to the millennium fund:
Name
Address Phone ( )
Number of bricks @ $100 each =
Engraving instructions: (use additional sheet for each brick)
n n❑
n n
❑ n
n❑❑
❑n
n
Please note:
➢ The City will not reserve particular spaces on the pathway for your brick
➢ The City reserves the right to accept or reject engraving requests.
➢ The City will not be responsible to replace bricks broken after installation, and may at its own
discretion, move or remove the walkway for City purposes at any time.
Payment:
❑ Check enclosed
(make checks payable to: City of Hermosa Beach /Millennium Walkway)
O Visa
❑ MC
CARD # Expiration Date
Charge Customer Signature:
Please note: Due to registration impacts, only mail orders will be accepted for the
Millennium Walkway project (no phone orders or walk-ins).
Send To: Millennium Walkway, 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach CA 90254. Thank
you.
Questions? Call Mitch Assurnma 318-0280.
• /ee-/
A D
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
(.
July 7, 1999
City Council Meeting
July 13, 1999
INITIATIVE PETITION TO REPEAL CERTAIN MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTIONS TO ELIMINATE HERMOSA BEACH UTILITY USERS TAX
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Receive and file the attached report that Council ordered pursuant to Elections Code
Section 9212 analyzing the fiscal impact of the proposed ordinance; and
2) Select one of the following alternatives:
(a) Introduce the ordinance without alteration (then adopt it within 10 days; or
(b) Direct the City Clerk to prepare the documents required to submit the ordinance,
without alteration, to the voters at the next regular municipal election occurring
November 2, 1999.
Background:
At the meeting of June 22, 1999, the City Clerk presented to Council a Certificate of Sufficiency
for the subject initiative ordinance, noting that the petition contained valid signatures from more
than 5 percent of the Hermosa Beach votes cast for all candidates for governor at the November
3, 1998 gubernatorial election and has, therefore, qualified for the November 2, 1999 ballot. The
Council was presented with the alternatives mandated by State law to either: (a) introduce the
ordinance and adopt it within 10 days; (b) direct that the measure be submitted to the voters at
the next municipal election; or (c) order a report pursuant to Elections Code Section 9212 to be
presented to the Council within 30 days.
At that meeting, the Council opted to order a report, to be presented at the July 13 meeting,
thereby deferring action on the petition until that date. Staff was directed to report on the fiscal
impact of the proposed ordinance. That report is attached.
REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES:
Option 2(a) – Introduce the Ordinance
If the City Council opts for Alternative 2(a)—to introduce the ordinance without alteration at
tonight's meeting—there would be no election. Because State law requires the subsequent
adoption of the ordinance to take place within 10 days, it would be necessary to adjourn tonight's
meeting to a date no later than Thursday, July 22, 1999, in order to adopt the ordinance within
the State -mandated time limit.
• •
Option 2(b) — Direct the Measure be Placed on the November 2, 1999 Ballot
If the City Council opts for Alternative 2(b)—to direct the City Clerk to prepare the required
documents to submit the ordinance without alteration to a vote of the people at the regular
municipal election of November 2, 1999—the City Clerk would prepare all appropriate
resolutions and associated documents for approval and adoption by the Council at its July 27,
1999 meeting, which is the last regular Council meeting before the County deadline for placing
measures on the November ballot..
Elaine Doerfling, City Cle
Noted.
Step ' .I 'rell, ity Manager
Attachments: Report from City Manager Steve Burrell dated July 7, 1999
Proposed ordinance identified as Exhibit "A"
July 7, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
July 13, 1999
REPORT REGARDING THE IMPACT OF REPEALING THE 6% UTILITY
USER TAX ON CITY SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES
AND VISITORS PREPARED PURSUANT TO ELECTION CODE SECTION 9212
PURPOSE
This report is intended to show the impact of repealing the 6% utility user tax on City
services provided to residents, businesses and visitors. This report has been prepared
pursuant to City Council direction in accordance with Section 9212 of the Election Code.
BACKGROUND
The City has had a utility user tax since 1985. The tax is expected to generate $1,700,000
during the 1999-2000 fiscal year. This represents 13.6% of the City's total General Fund
revenue of $12,500,000. The funds have been used primarily for police protection and
sewer reconstruction and maintenance. A transfer of $700,000 is made to the sewer fund
for reconstruction and maintenance projects and $100,000 is transferred to the Capital
Improvement Fund for street repairs.
I have attached several charts that show where the City's revenue comes from and where
it is spent. The charts show that the largest expenditure from the General Fund is for the
Police and Fire Departments, which make up about 60% of the General Fund budget or a
total of $7,900,000. The largest source of revenue for the General Fund is property taxes,
which is expected to total $3,700,000 for the fiscal year. Sales taxes are the second
largest at $2,116,000 and the UUT is third at $1,700,000. The remaining General Fund
revenue comes from a number of other taxes and fees for services. Many of these other
sources have grown in the last few years primarily as the result of an improved economy
and new building. The hotel tax has increased as the result of a new hotel and increased
usage at existing properties. Fees collected for building permits has increased
significantly as a result of the mini building boom going on in the South Bay area.
Together, these increases have partially offset the funds taken by the state.
The elimination of the utility user tax revenue would cause a significant reduction in
services provided by the City. If the repeal of the utility user tax is approved, the tax
would no longer be collected as of December 31, 1999. The most practical way to reduce
the City's expenditures in order to offset the $1,700,000 in lost revenue is to reduce
ongoing operational costs. Personnel costs make up 68% of General Fund expenditures.
The remaining 32% are allocated for contract services, operating expenses and a small
portion of the City's Capital Improvement program. It would be virtually impossible to
achieve the cost saving necessary without reducing staffing in all departments. It will
• •
take a workforce reduction of 22% of the total of City employees to achieve the partial
cost savings necessary to balance the budget without the UUT revenue. There also would
be reductions in or elimination of activities and expenditures in several areas where we
use private contractors, such as street sweeping, park maintenance, crossing guards,
NPDES reporting and building maintenance. These types of reductions would have a
significant impact on the services received by our residents, businesses and visitors.
In the event that the voters repeal the tax, the task of the City Council would be to enact a
series of reductions in expenditures to make up for the loss of the revenue. In developing
possible recommendations, the following realities were considered. It would not be
possible to leave public safety out of the cuts and still have much of an operation. If
Police and Fire were held harmless, the total number of non -safety reductions would be
over 40% of the non -safety workforce. I do not believe that we could function as a full
service city at that point. Two departments generate revenue, Community Development
and Community Resources, and although some cuts would be recommended in these
departments, additional cuts would not be recommended as we would lose the revenue
that goes along with the service we provide. There was no consideration given to wage
reduction as a way to close the gap. Frankly, it would have to reach around 16-21% in
order to make up enough to balance the budget. A reduction of that size is not a realistic
option in this labor market.
The following is a list of changes that would be recommended to reduce expenditures to
achieve a balanced budget. This has been developed in an honest attempt to explain the
impact of the repeal of the tax and is not a scare tactic.
• The Police Department sworn police personnel would be reduced to the
minimum deployment necessary to staff each shift with patrol officers and
maintain the detective division. This level of staffing would virtually
eliminate specialty assignments, including the motor/traffic division,
additional downtown enforcement, specialized traffic enforcement in
neighborhoods and at schools and reduce our ability to staff special events.
• The Fire Department is presently staffed with 18 sworn shift personnel and the
Fire Chief with 6 firefighter/paramedics working each shift. If a reduction
were made to 5 firefighter/paramedics per shift, we would no longer be able to
staff the second response engine. This second engine provides a first response
when a second call for service is received. In addition, the inability to use the
second engine has an impact on the automatic aid agreements the City has
with our neighboring communities.
• The reductions in the Public Works Department would significantly impact
the Maintenance Division, providing only minimal sewer maintenance and
critical repairs on other facilities. If the tax is repealed, a major effort would
need to be undertaken to reduce the City's responsibilities in terms of
maintaining facilities. We simply would be an in mode of keeping things
safe.
• •
• In the Community Resources Department, staffing would be reduced
somewhat or the fees raised to the point where there is no subsidy by the
general fund. The special programs, special events, coordination and
assistance provided to non -profits would have to be cut back.
• In the Community Development Department, even though most department
operations are covered by fees, the general fund portion of operations would
have to be reduced.
• Additional staffing reductions would be proposed in the Finance Department
and Administrative offices, which includes the City Manager, City Clerk and
Personnel Department.
The overall reduction would be approximately 30 positions out of 134 positions. I have
also attached some information concerning the history of the Utility Users Tax that you
might find helpful as the issue is discussed.
Res. - ctfully submitted,
4,00
tep en Burrell
City Manager
GENERAL FUND - WHERE THE MONEY COMES
FROM
1999-00 ESTIMATED
LIC/PERMITS
SVC CHRGS
PROPERTY TAX
USE/MONEY/PROP
GENERAL FUND - WHERE THE MONEY IS SPENT
1999-00 BUDGET
COMM DEVEL
MGMT/SUPPORT
CAP IMPRV
LEGISLATIVE
• •
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS RELATING TO THE UTILITY USERS TAX
ORDINANCE EFFECTIVE DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
85-804 10/1/85 Action by City Council to establish tax, 6%
October 1, 1985 - July 1, 1986. 5% thereafter,
expiration 10/1/88
86-832 5/22/86 Action by City Council to clarify language
"service user" and limit applicability of senior
exemption to residence only
86-837 6/29/86 Action by City Council to leave rate at 6%
permanently, deletion of sunset clause
87-896 3/1/88 Ballot measure 11/3/87 raising rate from 6% to
10%, majority vote applied for general tax,
53.02% of vote received
88-919
6/7/88 Ballot measure 6/7/88 designating 4% as
special tax to be used for purchase fo right-of-
way only, terminating upon finding by City
Council that tax is no longer needed. Confirms
6% for general governmental purposes. 2/3
vote required, 83.01 % received
88-967 12/13/88 City Council action repealing refund provision,
implementing penalty for delinquency
95-1133 7/11/95 Ordinance amending Section 30-46 relating to
telephone tax, to include interstate,
international and cellular charges.
95-1137 11/14/95 Ordinance terminating 4% of tax (special) used
to purchase A. T. & S.F. Railroad right-of-way.
City Attorney 11/23/98 City Attorney ruling that collection of tax for
Opinion interstate and international calls must cease
11/1/98 since the imposition of the tax for that
purpose was not placed before the voters
Ordinance to follow.
C:MYDOCS/UTSUMRY.DOC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
• •
EXHIBIT A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
REPEALING SECTIONS 3.36.040, 3.36.050, 3.36.060, 3.36.070 AND 3.36.080 OF
CHAPTER 3.36 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TAXPAYER CONSENT ACT
The people of the City of Hermosa Beach do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS, DETERMINATIONS AND DECLARATIONS.
(a) Proposition 218, the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," passed by the people of
California in 1996 is intended to provide effective tax relief and to require voter approval of new,
extended or increased taxes, assessment, fee and charge increases. However, local government
has subjected taxpayers to excessive tax, assessment, fee and charge increases without their
consent that frustrates the purposes of voter approval for new, extended or increased taxes.
(b) The 6 % Utility User Tax was imposed on the businesses and people of the City
of Hermosa Beach without their consent.
(c) Hermosa Beach with its assessment districts and Utility User Tax has higher taxes
than other cities. Everything we buy in Hermosa Beach costs more because of the 6% Utility
User Tax. Local businesses suffer from the competition in other cities without excessive taxes.
(d) The Utility User Tax was promised to expire shortly after being imposed yet
continues to this day, fourteen (14) years later. The citizens of Hermosa Beach wish to have
their right to vote on this tax as demonstrated by their passage of Proposition 218, the "Right to
Vote on Taxes Act" in 1996.
(e) This initiative protects taxpayers by allowing the people of Hermosa Beach an
opportunity to repeal the Utility User Tax if they so wish, and require that any future attempt to
levy, extend or increase such a tax be submitted to the voters of Hermosa Beach for their consent
or rejection.
SECTION 2. PURPOSE AND INTENT. The purpose and intent of this act is to
provide effective tax relief and to require voter approval of any new, extended or increased taxes.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
•
The City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is subject to the following modifications:
Sections 3.36.040, 3.36.050, 3.36.060, 3.36.070 and 3.36.080 of Chapter 3.36 of the
Hermosa Beach Municipal Code are hereby REPEALED in their entirety.
SECTION 3. ALTERATION. There shall be no modifications, amendments, or repeal
of any provision of this ordinance without a majority vote of the people.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause, word or phrase of
this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality
of the remaining portions of this ordinance and shall remain in full force and effect; it being
expressly declared that this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, word and
phrase hereof, would have been prepared, proposed, adopted and approved irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, words or phrases be declared
invalid or unconstitutional. The portions of this act shall supersede all inconsistent provisions of
city law.
SECTION 5. Any ordinance which is adopted concurrently with this ordinance which
receives less votes and is in conflict with any provisions herein shall be repealed in its entirety and
be of no force and effect.
SECTION 6. This act shall take effect January 1, 2000.
SECTION 7. This initiative measure is to be adopted by the City Council of Hermosa
Beach or be submitted to the voters at the next succeeding municipal election or at a special
election as provided for by law.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance
and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
2
A • •
July 8, 1999
City Council Meeting
July 13, 1999
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
BOARD/COMMISSION EXPIRATION OF TERMS -
APPOINT PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council appoint/reappoint from among the applicants interviewed
earlier this evening to fill the two expired terms on the Planning Commission. Each of the
appointments is for a four-year term ending June 30, 2003.
Planning Commission - two terms, which expired June 30, five applicants. Both of the
incumbents applied for reappointment, three additional applicants (no applications
were received during the deadline extension).
Applicants:
Charlie C. Cheatham
Robert M. Harvey, Jr.
Peter R. Hoffman
Sam Perrotti
Peter C. Tucker
All of the above applicants were notified by mail of the date, time and place of the scheduled
interviews.
Background:
At its meeting of June 22, 1999, the City Council extended the application filing deadline to 6
p.m. Wednesday, July 7, and scheduled a meeting prior to the July 13 regular meeting to interview
applicants for the above -noted commission. Those interviews were conducted this evening at
6:30 p.m. Appointments are appropriate at this time.
Elaine Doerfling, City
Noted:
Stephen R. B 1 City Manager
11a
e
•
PLANNING
COMMISSION
APPLICANTS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH _ JUN 1 0 1999
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION .6,3. ortir
.% ,n.• + M..,... e.00e �Q
NAME OF COMMISSION Planning Commission
Name Charlie C. Cheatham Home Phone: 310-798-4225
Address: 548 2nd Street, Hermosa Beach
Occupation/Profession: Federal Civil Service, Senior Manager
Name of Employer:
Department of Defense Bus Phone: 310-900-6526
Address of Employer: DCMDW-O, 18901 S, Wilmington, Carson CA 90746
REFERENCES:
Local: Wilhelm Sarasalo, President, Pacific Software, 310-545-7038
Professional: Dave Underwood, USAF Space & Missile Center, Finance Deputy, 310-363-2310
Other: Scott Fonoimoana, Construction, 310-600-2750
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Recently elected
VP for Certification with the South Bay chapter of the National Contracts Management
Association. Additionally, I have been training to be a Disaster Assistance Coordinator with the
American Red Cross. Also, I have attended and spoken at a number of City Council and
Planning Commission meetings.
Why do you wish to become a Commission member? I wish to become more active in
community affairs and help to continue the improvements in Hermosa Beach that have been
occurring over the past few years. Although there are many avenues for volunteering my time
and efforts, the issues that the Planning Commission deals with are of most interest to me. I feel
that my background and circumstances will allow me to fully comprehend the process and fairly
represent the Hermosa populace.
What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? The Planning
Commission member's primary role is to ensure that proposed projects and activities meet
acceptable standards established by the City, and that these projects are beneficial to the
populace. This includes serving as a member of the Design Review Board, investigating and
reporting on improvements for subdivisions, approving vesting tentative maps, granting
conditional use permits. granting precise development plans, approving development
agreements, initiating or recommending for adoption amendments for zoning, approving
signage, and other items.
• •
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of
interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other
experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member:
Education:
• BS in Industrial Engineering, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, 1982
• MS in Systems Management, USC, 1992
Employment:
• Architect Engineer, Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, 1977-1978. Designed
industrial facilities for the shipyard.
•
Industrial Engineer, Air Force Space Division, El Segundo, 1979-1985. Served as
Manufacturing Operations Manager and Property Manager for space launch
vehicles.
Industrial Policy Manager, Headquarters Air Force, Pentagon, 1985-1986.
Worked with Congress and other government Agencies to establish Air Force
wide policies concerning Value Engineering, Strategic and Critical Materials,
Priorities and Allocations, Title III, and other high level programs.
• Program Manager, Air Force Space Division, El Segundo, 1986-1988. In charge
of the Industrial Modernization Incentives Program for launch vehicles.
•
Manufacturing Assessment Branch Chief, Air Force Plant Office, Douglas
Aircraft, Long Beach, 1989-1990. In charge of evaluating the contractor's
manufacturing operations for the C-17 aircraft.
Program Support and Systems Engineering Branch Chief, Air Force Plant Office,
Rocketdyne, Canoga Park, 1990-1992. In charge of engineering surveillance and
program integration on NASA Space Shuttle and Space Station programs.
Contact Administration Program Manager, Defense Contract Management
Command, Carson, 1992 -present. Held a number of senior level positions at our
Western District Headquarters. Established programs and policies regarding
contracting practices, quality assurance, manufacturing surveillance, engineering
practices, and government property accounting. Established functional
automation systems for the District. Involved in a number of acquisition reform
initiatives that are establishing commercial practices for Department of Defense
purchases of products and services. Established a Malcom Baldrige based
auditing system for the Command. Currently supervising fifty Senior Functional
Advisors who are establishing knowledge management processes and training
throughout the District.
• •
• In 1998, I started a firm called C3 Disaster Consulting Services to allow me to
write a book on disaster assistance.
Memberships/certifications:
• Member National Contracts Management Association
• Certified as a Professional Contracts Manager
• Vice President, Certifications
• Member Order of the Engineer
• Received Engineer in Training (EIT) certification
• Senior member American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
• Member Department of Defense Acquisition Corps
• Certified in Manufacturing and Production
• Certified in Program Management
This Board/Commission meets on Tuesdays at 7:00 p.m. Do you foresee any
scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X No
How long have you lived in Hermosa beach? 1994 to present
Comments: If the two current members are reinstated, I wish to still be considered for a
Planning Commission position should another vacancy arise.
Signed:
Date: 10 ',11//43 --
?1
• •
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL C
NAME OF COMMISSION
Name: ���-Jc J�
Address: Sc) Gr-,�„1, .5.i
5530
Home Phone : C3 (o)3 7
Occupation or Profession: (fjL,t:1�1,^'� U�- ic;aI
Name of Employer: \nil i t t cId ry A.ssac
Bus. Phone: (3c) Spm- c
Address of Employer: /.;?ob Foss hnt,ds Pk%/eV So
REFERENCES:
Local: M4kr- J j-( -'5
Professional:
Other:
!mac- . C.
N h 12,E,4N t"frs-• G)A,
M3 . ` c. C C FfAtejerr. , P LJ . l%� ` f,' C f C �l Fj,r
;47-. 2oC,J / N 5 y (7o
/41V,v;›..
4F,c;,e-12=_L
ir
/4-604•4c.,
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present):
/Vo.4-1 r
/4s
A
Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? /fir 4-55,,,r,44ucc o�
Lc%i �Z C.., c>lu.eia.i-,.
-714c �c.�/.'� .scc�•2 !a: {moi t�n: /, i'.�o%..1,sc.'-ic
T V
'Y �i c -j C S
(
7
;77�AMtii.V,
What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? -
r /�
-�- ! /.O 1141 ;it.. /..c/7•4 G ,,c �6 e[.t// �c KO 7F-U.tJ.��-a.cL $ �,—./p .1r7 -i
�± /} / 3 2rS I. =5 cls -tom
/ ,S,,5" GI C S -•l n clic. 4 c .T--7,--c.cJprx•+. -� o -k i� c lv ��t�s
•
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be
construed as a conflict of interest? Yes 5C No (If yes, please list)
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past
activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a
Commission member.
C:1NHf� ��y A35``rG�.0 (%7 .• t'V , �S ` UGd +4.>..2 �1U.
%�
// /
i�( i%/U �CG%� CLV S —C tJ .2 � Y C CY"/ . �j
•-s; / i'3r�c_ o cic(S �c�..c '�4 c (e,_.+, .3 -6 !C�.t1�15
A44 c
/-7,00C
Us•��!c.c,���s c- �Yx�. S /�/ •�ClC�svG).c. / 3 �Lr n �C% ,• �o �K
/mac 7e / / 3 —(LO ce.."< C'cic
/ 1 fiLt
o Cn<..:_c// c
44.1cct3•. C�-aPC15
47c1.,.--„,
{{.( JJ ,z /o, �7r e 7 Jl "-fr%.a�/.�o / _ /Y
/�l"f•7r Cdr., !'(/C.: :/i.t S i. v,lS Sc4c. (C^i�? �.(�:.t -c-,z; , ` �4.c:•.. t. e3; '{) /5-7 C .'a :. .r c. CO(%JC
Trc�r.�oG.c✓l ( '2 C C a.4- Flo�c-�N, -c., -7;sF (-5"; <.4•— s c656
This Commission meets on at p.m. Do you foresee
any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes r-74cNo
How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach?
Comments: /;fir
/ -0 , -�� G •��
-f
Signed:
Date:
6/5/91
THE CITY OF HERMOSA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO
NAME OF COMMISSION
Name: Peter R. Hoffman
Planning Commissio
Address:
811 Loma Drive
Occupation or Profession:
Professor
Name of Employer: Loyola Marymount University
Bus. Phone: 310-338-7380
Address of Employer: 7900 Loyola Blvd. L.A.. CA 90045-8410
REFERENCES:
Local: Mr. & Mrs. Larry Poindexter 336 29th; Mr. & Mrs. David LaMonica
Professional: Dr. Loretta Morris, Dept. of Sociology, LMU
Other:. Hon. Richard W. Lyman, Jr., Manhattan Beach
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present) : Over the past 20 years
in the South Bay, I have been active in a number of local youth sports programs, as coach
and board member (AYSO, Hurricanes, Little League, etc.). I have also been involved in
local school programs/groups (incl. Mira Costa H.S.) and served on the board of the local
AFS chapter. For approximately 10 years I was also a weekly contributor to the
Beach Reporter and helped the editors develop a weekly question dealing with local
issues (for which I provided the illustration).
Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? This is a critical time in
the development (and re -development) of Hermosa Beach --a process in which the
Planning Commission will play a vital role in defining the future character and
quality of life in our town.
What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member?
A planning commissioner should represent the concerns and interests of the city's resident
in the city planning and permiting process. Given the high quality of City staff, our
Commission typically does not have to provide much direct guidance to their routine
operations, but the Commission must be preparaa to provide cl'rrif ns and guidance
consistent with the city plan and the apparent wishes of the citizens when appropriate.
• •
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be
construed as a conflict of interest? Yes X No (If yes, please list)
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past
activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a
Commission member.
I am the Director of the Urban Studies Program and a professor of geography, with an
area of expertise in urban geography, at Loyola Marymount University. My education includes
an MA in geography and planning (Arizona 1974) and a PhD in geography (UCLA 1983). I have
developed and taught classes in urban and environmental planning at the undergraduate and
graduate level. I am also the Director of the Neighborhood Empowerment Program of the
Center for the Study of Los Angeles --an independent research unit of LMU--and have been
working in a number of planning and development programs in various parts of Los Angeles.
I have extensive experience in the areas of urban design, urban planning, and historic
preservation. I have consulted to a variety of organizations and groups, both in the U.S.
and internationally, in these areas. My professional work has required that I work closely
with a number of planning commissions, planning departments, and related city agencies.
I believe I have a good understanding of the tunction of the Planning Commission and its
duties and responsibilities under state law in California.
This Commission meets on 3rd Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. Do you foresee
any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X No
How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach?
Comments:
3 years
previously lived in Manhattan Beach for 20 years and followed local/regional
issues involving Hermosa Beach carefully due to my involvement with the
Beach Reporter and professional interest in urban issues
Signed: �.
g
Date:
6/5/91
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION
NAME OF COMMISSION Planning Commission
Sam Perrotti
Name
Home Phone: (310) 372-7269
Address: 1506 Golden Ave., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Occupation/Profession:
Name of Employer State of Ca., Dept. of Real Estat eBus. Phone: (213) 576-6851
Appraiser
II
•
Address of Employer 320 West 4th St., Suite 350, Los Angeles, CA 9u013
REFERENCES:
Local: Sam Edgerton, J.R. Reviczky
Professional: Robert Smylie, Smylie and Associates (Real Estate Attorney) (310) 553-3758
Other:
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present):
Member of the Board of Directors of Resources For Independence since 1998
Chamber of Commerce since 1991
Historical Society since 1991
Candidate for City Treasurer 1991
Why do you wish to become a Commission member? Presently I am a Planning C'.ommi ssi over
however my appointment expires 6-30-99. I feel I have shown during the past 4 years
aptitude and temperment necessary for this position. I feel
that I have the knowledge,
that my decisions hay- .-
for the meetings. I bring
exparienrP as an appraiser
• . . . •i_• - .20 •_
to the position of Planning Commissioner 28 years of
and budget analyst.
What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? The primary duties are
to maintain and enhance the environment of the community, which includes long range
plannis. .- -a- .. _ .. _ -- _ _ _ . . •uties
include resolving land use issues by applying the City Zoning Code and the policies of
the City Council and Planning Commission. The major issues are zoning, subdivision_,
conditional use permits and variances.
Page 1 of 2
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of
interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes x No (If yes, please explain)
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other
experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member.
Education: Bachelor of Arts, Providence College, 1963; LawDegree, William&Mary,1966
Various professional classes.
Military: Captain, US Army, 1967-1969
Occupational: Licensed residential appraiser - License Number AL 019832
Supervising Appraiser, Subdivisions, Department of Real Estate.
During my four years as Planning Commissioner, I feel that my decisions have been
logical, reasonable and that I have been well prepared for the meetings. I am very
familiar with the Civil Code pertaining to subdivisions, the structure and operation of
common interest subdivisions, the budgeting for homeowner associations and
various real estate laws and procedures. I feel I have been able to deal effectively
with the City Planning Department Staff. I have successfully communicated with the
general public and representatives of the Building Industry for many years with my
position with the Department of Real Estate. I possess the flexibility and knowledge
needed to balance the needs of residential homeowners and commercial activity. See
attached resume.
This Board/Commission meets on 3rd Tuesday at 7 p.m. Do you foresee
any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes x No
How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach?
Comments:
21 years
I will do my best to make my term as a Planning
Oonunissioncr successful and effective.
Signed:
Date: 6 - 1?
(5/15/99)
Page 2 of 2
•
SAVERIO PERROTTI, JR.
1506 Golden Avenue
Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254
Residence: (310) 372-7269
Business: (213) 576-6851
EDUCATION: College: Bachelor of Arts, Providence College, 1963
Graduate: Degree in Law, College of William and Mary, 1966
Career: Various appraisal and real estate classes.
MILITARY: Captain US Army 1967 to 1969
MISCELLANEOUS:
Planning Commissioner, City of Hermosa Beach, 1995 to present.
Member of the Board of Directors of Resources For Independence, a non -pro f i t
ortanization that promotes self-reliance for persons coping with mental illness an d
developmental disability.
Member of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce 1991 to present.
Licensed Residential Appraiser - License number AL 019832
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE:
January 1980 to Present: Supervising Appraiser for the Department of Real Estate.
Duties include analysis of condominium and planned unit development budgets,
completion cost estimates for construction projects, the research and writing of HOA
cost manuals, instruction, training of trainee appraisers, appraisal of condominium
and subdivided land interests in other States.
Additional duties include administrative tasks and personal responsibility for t h e
most difficult appraisal assignments. Types of property appraised: vacant land,
commercial, residential, and resort properties including timeshare projects.
Responsible for the review of appraisals submitted to the Department, supervision o f
up to 10 journeymen appraisers plus clerical staff. Expert witness in cases involving
valuation issues where fraud by California Real Estate Licensees is alleged.
October 1977 to March 1978: Manager of the Subdivision Department for Lawyers
Title Insurance, San Jose, Ca. Responsible for the recording of subdivision maps a n d
other documents. Prepared title reports and policies. Coordinate processing o f
Subdivision Public Reports between Department of Real Estate and subdividers.
January 1976 to October 1977: Deputy Commissioner with the Department of Real
Estate. Conducted investigations of violations of the Subdivision Land Act and
Syndication Act. Prepared Subdivision Public Reports.
January 1970 to January 1976: Associate Right of Way Agent for the State o f
California, Department of Transportation. Acquired and appraised residential,
commercial, and industrial property for transportation right of way purposes. I n
addition, assisted the relocation of individuals displaced by transportation projects.
• •
rt
67 JUN1 4 1999
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
mac. cu..
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION ,1' °" "."1"' Illacn
NAME OF COMMISSION Vi_1 1J) I ( O lu Nl % S i 00
Name ?&—` - f 31Gi t,T
Address: _2 3.5 -
Home Phone: 3 /0 347
Occupation/Profession: (' 1 b�� �o �! • c
Name of Employer cZ 1 -
Address of Employer g-/N-i,AG-- A S
REFERENCES:►/
Local: rPv� �SH1 (co,ciA /(n vkE ���Au� AiJ� Koi.ALLL.
374 3o2 g
Professional: COrev 6( )L 0 v''
,3'7 - / 3'7,Z- 1 3�z -415' 5-
►/
Other: �G..L.) �v .til, 'OL' Ms-4f
S-ralG botele��--�-
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and
present): MC - 0 F
VL-01-)1(4-(_-0M1,-Ik c7k) C �q TR- i) VETC1\& 1)670-LiC-7 WO TO` M
1 51,0)4.( t4T
R.L.='F
� c-11 26,z 57,/
- 800 - a a ,5 - 0,2.5
Bus. Phone:
F—�-• \[L= -/J4 W /AIVtL G )4-? L4 TfLc- �lZ �i7 ��f�1j �Uyw1 -i7
QuTAT v0L-0L) EE N- '�as��=hA-. '- CUAc.14 50cco►2 GOD -CH $
u .6 c6.4"as M g�� 'TQ EC ��CA►.T1&)4 & -> P,a-� �1�t.5 oc�a
Why do you
(wish to become a Commission member? TCS �JSv2.6 72I iy
1_1 Ft- J HaL!-l0�,a� ►(.
.1/4V.�fc2-G -iii -E SLi., oro I P (352-‘
What do you feel are the duties and responsibili ies of a Commission member? -1-- V/O\2Q
t a_ COLJoLt� O tLAb..LS
C.- F �C i L v e��/ 1 G.l �cu
/c' 6 4f OP --<G "r4 E ZOO 1 Ofr 6.01)(:= a -F 11-tE -1-' !
Page 1 of 2
• •
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of
interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No (If yes, please explain)
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other
experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member.
ikikk k4. S. l 9 ce
Et_ Cl��,� o - s �oG J o tr ! 91 7 &szi- z 1z R.E)
1--00 tito NI- - 1974 is _ _ A)0Le y
cc, 2 N �"`l tJ\e 3) C R k LoGAi- 1/47g3. 'L�'fl o
CwtGOGQ-A. 1.)c6- 1 9 '/Ge,
o- t t v 1.gov14 tom- 5 106a- 1 96,8
Li FE Lo or t t n1�rt- ol= 1-k-1/4-4c5Pt 6 MA -0, -1A -171N,
1 -X7- N, G.I..V00'2_
l C15 o 14. *71,AC&12._
This Board/Commission meets on 1 tl t.zd ft, E at p.m. Do you foresee
any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes k No
How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 02 6 9 R-
Comments:
(5/15/99)
Page 2 of 2
1,
S
July 1, 1999
City Council Meeting
July 13, 1999
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS - JULY 1998
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council appoint delegates and alternates to the various
committees (see attached updated list), consistent with the policy of maintaining permanent
representation whenever possible, and delete any obsolete temporary subcommittees as
appropriate.
Background:
At its meeting of June 22, 1999, the City Council acted to appoint the following:
- Mayor (term ending Tuesday, April 11, 2000):
- Mayor Pro Tempore (same term as Mayor):
- L.A. County City Selection Committee Delegate:
- South Bay Cities Sanitation District Delegate:
Alternate:
- Inglewood Fire Training Authority Delegate:
Alternate:
Julie Oakes
J.R. Reviczky
Mayor Oakes
Mayor Oakes
Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky
Mayor Oakes
Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky
The appointment of delegates and alternates is now required for the remainder of the City Council
committee assignments. The September 1998 committee -assignment list (attached) has been
updated to include the changes made at the last meeting. Council members are requested to
contact Mayor Oakes prior to the July 13 meeting concerning any preferences with regard to
committee assignments.
Please note that the appointed delegate and alternate should be the same for both the South Bay
Corridor Study Steering Committee and the South Bay Cities Association since their meetings
occur back-to-back on the same day and at the same location.
Also, two of the committees require resolutions for the appointments of delegates and alternates.
Councilmember Edgerton is the current delegate and Finance Director Viki Copeland the current
alternate for the Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority (ICLFA). Councilmember Edgerton
is also the current delegate for the Independent Cities Risk Management Association (ICRMA);
Personnel/Risk Management Director Michael Earl is the designated alternate, and Finance
Director Viki Copeland and is the substitute alternate representative who would serve in the
1
lib
• •
absence of the appointed delegate and alternate. If assignment changes are made this evening
with regard to either of those committees, an appropriate resolution will be placed on the consent
calendar of the July 27 agenda for Council adoption.
Following the assignments of delegates and alternates, letters will be sent to the appropriate
boards and committees, and the list of newly appointed delegates and alternates will be forwarded
to Council.
NOTED:
Stephen R. u ' ell, City Manager
2
Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION OF DELEGATES AND
ALTERNATES APPOINTMENTS AND/OR REAPPOINTMENTS
Beach Cities Committee
Delegate
Reviczky (as called)
Delegate Bowler
Coordinating Council
Delegate
(4th Thurs. [dark in Dec.]
Edgerton 12:00 lunch, Scotty's - HB
Independent Cities Association
Delegate
Oakes (Quarterly - dinner meeting)
Alternate Bowler
Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority
Delegate
Alternate
Edgerton (Annual - in June, as called)
Copeland RESOLUTION NO. 93-5652
Independent Cities Risk Management Association
Delegate
Edgerton (2nd Wed. - 10:30 a.m., Huntington Park)
Alternate Earl (Copeland - substitute) RESOLUTION NO. 97-5886
Inglewood Fire Training Authority Commission (same as South Bay Sanitation District)
Delegate Oakes
Alternate
Reviczky (3rd Wed. - 1:30 p.m., Torrance City Hall)
League of California Cities - Board of Directors
Delegate Edgerton (1st Thurs. - 7 p.m., 700 S. Almanson,
Almanson Court, Salon #4, Alhambra
Alternate Oakes [dark in July])
Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (must appoint alternate separately each time
when unable to attend meeting)
Mayor Oakes (as called)
Page 1 Appointments 9-22-98
(as amended 6/22/99)
•
Metropolitan Transportation Authority City Selection Committee
Delegate
Oakes (as called)
Alternate Reviczky
Sister City Association, Inc.
Delegate
Reviczky (3rd Thurs., as called, various locations)
Alternate Benz
South Bay Cities Association (same as South Bay Corridor Study
Steering Committee)
Delegate Bowler
Alternate
(4th Thurs. - 7 p.m., Cultural Arts Bldg.,
Reviczky Music Room, Torrance City Hall)
South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles)
(same as Inglewood Fire Training Authority)
Delegate Oakes
Alternate
Reviczky 3rd Wed. - 1:30 p.m., Torrance City Hall)
South Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee (same as South Bay Cities Association)
Delegate Bowler
Alternate
(4th Thurs. - 6 p.m., Cultural Arts Bldg.,
Reviczky Music Room, Torrance City Hall)
South Bay Youth Project (formerly called South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project)
Delegate Edgerton
Alternate
(Quarterly, as called - 6 p.m.,
Reviczky 320 Knob Hill, Room 4, Redondo Beach
Southern California Association of Governments [Added 6/9/98]
(Annual, as called - next one
Delegate Edgerton scheduled for April 7,8,9, 1999 in Monrovia
West Basin Water Association
Delegate
(Quarterly - dinner meeting - 4th Thurs. -
Benz 6 p.m., Charlie Brown's, Redondo Beach)
Alternate Reviczky
Page 2 Appointments 9-22-98
(as amended 6/22/99)
r •
Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project
Delegate Benz
Alternate Etta Simpson
SUB -COMMITTEES
Pier Reconstruction (Temporary)
Councilmember Oakes
Councilmember Reviczky
Beach Cities Health District (Temporary)
Councilmember Reviczky
Councilmember Edgerton
Bijou Development Project (Temporary)
Councilmember Edgerton
Councilmember Oakes
Airport Expansion (Temporary) [Formed 6/24/97]
Councilmember Reviczky
Councilmember Oakes
Millennium Celebration (Temporary) [Formed 1/27/98]
Councillmember Bowler
Councilmember Oakes
Preferencial Parking Area (Temporary) [Formed 5/12/98]
Councilmember Oakes
Councilmember Edgerton
Page 3 Appointments 9-22-98
(as amended 6/22/99)
City -School District Partnership (Temporary) [Formed 5/28/98]
Councilmember Edgerton
Councilmember Oakes
Council Chambers Remodel (Temporary) [Formed 7/28/98]
Councilmember Reviczky
Councilmember Oakes
Page 4 Appointments 9-22-98
(as amended 6/22/99)