The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/10/01bt-4-‘6 aguLtz_ It is easy to take liberty for granted, yhen you have never had it taken from you. - Dick Cheney AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 10, 2001- Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK John Bowler Elaine Doerfing MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Kathy Dunbabin John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell Julie Oakes • CITY ATTORNEY J. R. Reviczky Nfichael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. City Council agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATION TO DEE STRANGE RECOGNIZING 44 YEARS OF SERVICE WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT PROCLAMATIONS PARKS & RECREATION MONTH JULY 2001 CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF JUNE 26, 2001: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. -ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 12, 2001; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on June 26, 2001. 2 (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to authorize the purchase of four (4) new Ford Crown Victoria black and white police sedans from Wondries Fleet Group of Alhambra, California in the amount of $100,275.84 (includes tax). Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin. (e) Recommendation to adopt a resolution thereby removing Officer Garth Gaines from the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's VISA card. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 2, 2001. (f) Recommendation to approve the Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City and David Evans & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $17,404 for the extra services performed beyond the original scope of work for Project No. 95-507, Valley Park Improvements, and to make changes to the plans, specifications and estimates for the restroom building; and, authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said amendment to the agreement, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated . June 28, 2001. (g) Recommendation to receive and file Project Status Report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 28, 2001. (h) Recommendation to accept the work by Los Angeles Engineering Inc. for Project No. CIP 99-144, Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Walkway Between 24th Street and 35th Street; authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion; and, authorize staff to release payment to Los Angeles Engineering Inc. (5% retained for 35 days following filing of Notice of Completion). Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 13, 2001. (i) Recommendation to receive and file status report on Project No. OP 97-182, Myrtle Avenue Undergrounding, and Project No. CTP 97-183, Loma Drive Undergrounding. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 27, 2001. V) Recommendation to approve Professional Services Agreement No. 01-001 between the City and DMR Team, Inc. for $100,000 for engineering and design services on an as -needed basis; and, authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said agreement upon approval as to form by the City Attorney. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 27, 2001. (k) Recommendation to adopt resolution accepting real property quitclaim to the City of Hermosa Beach by Charles C. Knagenhelm and Eunice Knagenhelm. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 28, 2001. (1) Recommendation to retain Lea Associates to provide an appraisal to determine the value for leasing City owned property for the beach landing of the TvCom project; and, authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement the fee of $9,500 and to obtain additional services if required, to evaluate the economic benefit of the proposed project cable station, with additional work on a time and material basis in an amount not to exceed $6,500. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 2, 2001. (m) Recommendation to approve the proposal for the "Programming and Conceptual Design/Budgeting" phases of the Fire Station remodel, CIP No. 99-610, by the RRM Design Group, an architectural and engineering firm in the amount of $27,505. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated July 3, 2001. (n) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #25869 for a 2 -unit condominium project at 1141-1145 Cypress Avenue. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 3, 2001. (o) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Man #25968 for a 2 -unit condominium project at 649 & 651 5th Street. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 3, 2001. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a. A REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PARKING PLAN FOR ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTER TO ACCOMMODATE OFFICES, A HEALTH AND FITNESS CLUB, AND RETAIL USES, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, "HERMOSA PAVILION." Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 2, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. INITIATIVE PETITION TO REPEAL CERTAIN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS TO ELIMINATE HERMOSA BEACH UTILITY USER TAX. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 5, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive and file report ordered pursuant to Elections Code Section 9212 analyzing the fiscal impact of the proposed ordinance; and, 2) Select one of the following alternatives: (a) Introduce the ordinance without alteration (then adopt it within 10 days) or; (b) Direct the City Clerk to prepare the documents required to submit the ordinance, without alteration, to the voters at the next regular municipal election occurring November 6, 2001. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. BALLOT MEASURES - FUNDING FOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 5, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and consider the options. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. DESIGNATE A VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 3, 2001. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to stafffor a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on June 26, 2001. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Macpherson v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: BC172546 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 PRO LMMFTION Recognizing July as Parks as Recreation Month Whereas, the Tlarks and Recreation profession in California "Creates Community through 2eople, Tlarks and nlrograms"; and, Whereas, our parks help to preserve and protect the natural and cultural resources of California; and, Whereas, ¶1 arks and !Recreation services support more productive workforces, enhance the desirability of locations for business and families, and stimulate tourism revenues to increase a total community development model; and, Whereas, ¶larks and Recreation strengthens community image and sense of place, and increases cultural unity; and, Whereas, darks and Recreation promotes health and wellness and reduces health care costs; and, Whereas, harks and Recreation fosters human development, helping young people develop and grow into healthy adults, and helping adults continue to live longer; and, Whereas, 2arks and 1�Zecreation strengthens safety and security and reduces juvenile crime; and, Whereas, thousands of children, adults and seniors benefit from the wide range of services, facilities and programs provided by .lermosa Teach; Now, therefore, be it resolved .2lermosa Beach urges all residents to enjoy and recognize the social, physical, mental, economic, environmental and community benefits derived from our .recreation programs which provide something of value to everyone, and recognize3j4J of "r'larks and Recreation c.711onth". (Dated: 3uly 2001 Towler, J1ayor ElaineJDoerfling. Cita Clerk /VD) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at the hour of 7:15 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Pete Tucker, Planning Commissioner ROLL CALL: Present: Dunbabin, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Bowler announced that the meeting would be adjourned in memory of Michael Manse, owner of Mickey's Deli in Hermosa Beach. since 1953, who passed away last Thursday at the age of 70. He said Mr. Manse always had kind words and an open heart for anyone who came in and would be missed. He expressed condolences to his family. Councilmember Reviczky spoke of the soft sandwiches that he got at the Deli as a kid and the donated alcohol on occasion for Little League Las Vegas Night fundraisers. He said that Mr. Manse was truly a great guy in the community who would be sorely missed. Councilmember Dunbabin announced that the next meeting of the Economic Review Committee chaired by Joe Mark would take place on Thursday, June 14, at 7 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, noting that demographic data from several similar areas would be presented at the meeting. Mayor Bowler commended Kiwanis Club members and City employees who, on their own time and with the use of donated materials, refurbished the room at the Community Center used by the American Retarded Citizens (ARC). Mayor Bowler commented on the success of the Memorial Day weekend Fiesta Hermosa, noting the event raised a lot of money for the Kiwanis Club and other local non-profit groups. He also commented on the success of the Mervyn's Beach Bash that took place Thursday, June 7, through Sunday, June 10. Councilmember Edgerton spoke of the meeting that took place Saturday in Manhattan Beach related to the Los Angeles airport expansion plan, noting that it was a well -attended . meeting. He said that L.A. County Supervisor Don Knabe, State Senator Debra Bowen, State Assemblyman George Nakano and U.S. Representative Jane Harmon have spoken out against the proposal, and that newly elected Los Angeles Mayor James Hahn has indicated his opposition as well. Councilmember Dunbabin said several citizens have asked her how much money Mervyn's paid to put on the Beach Bash event. Community Resources Director Rooney said Mervyn's paid $55,000 in City fees and donated another $40,000 to the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation, the Skate Park, the Teen Program and the Parks and Recreation Commission's proposed community picnic. Page2 a 10551 1 City Council Minutes 06-12-01 � ,: COMMENDATIONS PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATION TO PAMELA ADAMS "OUTSTANDING CROSSING GUARD OF THE YEAR" Mayor Bowler read the commendation giving recognition to Ms. Adams for her valuable service to the children of the community, noting that the commendation would be forwarded to Ms. Adams. PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATIONS TO THE MIRA COSTA BOYS' VOLLEYBALL TEAM "CIF DIVISION II CHAMPIONS" Mayor Bowler read the commendation to Michael Cook, head coach, who thanked the Mayor and City Council for the recognition, noting that many of the players were from Hermosa Beach. Alex Dankers, one of the team captains from Hermosa Beach, came forward to talk about the season and introduce his teammates in the audience. He also thanked Tim Cooper, the team's trainer throughout the season. CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF. MAY 22, 2001: No reportable actions. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS City Clerk Doerfling noted a letter submitted June 12, 2001, from resident Lena Cord expressing concern about graffiti, parking and noise problems over the weekend. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Pete Tucker - Hermosa Beach, said there had been no enforcement at the north end of the City of the one-hour parking program now in effect; urged the City to hire more employees or keep people away from the downtown events; said residents paid $29 for parking permits but were unable to find parking on the streets; No name given - 18 -year Hermosa Beach resident, commended the Police for keeping crime down and the community safe, and Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld and Senior Building Inspector Charlie Swartz for their great problem -solving attitudes, and hoped that the City would continue to have the funds to retain professionals of that caliber; thanked, the City Council, saying Hermosa was a great city; Robert Bell - Hermosa Beach, said the weekend Beach Bash event went very well and that he had heard no complaints about it; City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10552 • • said his children had a great time, noting that the people running the event allowed the local children to be involved; Debbie Loob - Hermosa Beach, said she was representing several of her neighbors in the Bonnie Brae area above Pacific Coast Highway; noted traffic/parking problems over the weekend on their streets and in Vons parking lot; expressed concern about graffiti in her neighborhood; asked that the Council conduct a survey of the community and reevaluate the scope of events taking place in the City; suggested that events be scaled down; Barbara Elman - Hermosa Beach, asked about instituting a City tax of 50 cents per drink to fund street repairs, etc., saying the people coming to the City's bars created an impact and the tax would help make up for the inconveniences endured by the residents; expressed concern about parking problems at South Park and lack of enforcement; (City Attorney Jenkins said any new tax would require a vote of the people but doubted that State law would allow the City to impose a food or beverage tax) and Steven Roberts - Hermosa Beach, owner of Cafe Boogaloo, thanked the Council for adjourning its January 9 meeting in memory of his mother who had passed away, saying his family was very touched by the gesture. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Jim Lissner dated June 5, 2001 regarding restricting hours and happy house (and similar promotions) on new liquor licenses downtown. Action: To receive and file. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. Letter from Jim Lissner dated June 5, 2001 regarding diesel generators on the beach. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file. Motion Edgerton, second Dunbabin. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 3. Letter from Kaye Gagnon Sherbak of Voice, Jeff Du Clos of the Surfrider Foundation and Lisa Ryder of the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation requesting that the City Council implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices in the renovation of Valley Park and appoint Ann Barklow as the IPM and horticultural consultant on this project. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10553 City Manager Burrell responded to questions. Action: To direct staff to work with the group and present their recommendations for Council consideration when the final Valley Park design changes are presented to the Council Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: City Clerk Doerfling noted a supplemental letter. submitted June 12, 2001 from resident Howard Longacre concerning consent items 1(m), (o) and (q). Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (q), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (e) Reviczky, (I) Dunbabin, (m) Dunbabin, (p) Dunbabin, and (q) Oakes. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 8:05 P.M., the order of the agenda was suspended to go to public hearing item 4. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON MAY 22, 2001. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council held on May 22, 2001, as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTER NOS. 25219 THROUGH 25436, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NOS. 25227 AND 25229, AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NO. 25234 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the Check Register, as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items, as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE APRIL 2001 FINANCIAL REPORTS: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and 3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the April 2001 Financial Reports, as presented. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10554 (e) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATION OF $361.00 FROM HAWTHORNE SAVINGS TO BE USED FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES DOG PARADE SUPPLIES. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated June 1, 2001. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to publicly acknowledge and thank the donor. Action: To accept the donation of $361 from Hawthorne Savings for Community Resources Dog Parade supplies. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION ADDING POLICE CHIEF MICHAEL LAVIN TO THE LIST OF AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ELIGIBLE TO UTILIZE THE CITY'S VISA CARD. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated June 1, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01- 6137, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 00- 6073 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA CARD SERVICES FROM SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION." RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIM AND REFER IT TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated June 5, 2001. Claimant: Moore, William Date of Loss: 06/01/01 Date Filed: 06/04/01 Allegation: Illegal towing of automobile Action: To deny the above -noted claim, as recommended by staff. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND UNIPLAN ENGINEERING, INC. FOR $100,000 FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION SERVICES ON AN AS -NEEDED BASIS; AND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST AND THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT UPON APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 4, 2001. (g) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10555 1) Approve the agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Uniplan Engineering, Inc. for $100,000; and 2) Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said agreement upon approval as to form by the City Attorney. (I) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE PROPOSED RATE INCREASES AS REQUESTED BY FRANK SCOTTO TOWING OF TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA. Memorandum from Police Chief Michael Lavin dated June 5, 2001. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize the proposed rate increases for towing charges as requested by Frank Scotto Towing of Torrance, California. 0) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PROJECT STATUS REPORT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams. dated May 1, 2001. Action: To receive and file the status report on capital improvement projects that are either under design or construction. (k) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE COLOR SELECTION FOR PAINTING THE COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 4, 2001. (I) Action: To approve the color selection of dark beige for the first story and light beige for the second story for painting the Community Center building, as recommended by the Council subcommittee (Oakes and Dunbabin). AWARD LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TO U.S. LANDSCAPES, INC. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $579,668 FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2004; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE BUDGET; AND, APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $19,815 FROM PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES TO THE FY 2001-02 BUDGET FOR PARKS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 24, 2001. The item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Dunbabin for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Work Superintendent Flaherty responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10556 (m) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the landscape maintenance contract to U.S. Landscapes, Inc. of Huntington Beach, California, in the amount of $579,668 for a period of 36 months beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2004; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the landscape maintenance contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the budget; and 4) Appropriate an additional $19,815 from prospective expenditures to the FY 2001-02 budget for Parks. Motion Dunbabin, second Mayor Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. AWARD STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $593,853.12 FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2004; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE BUDGET; AND, APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $20,500 FROM PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES TO THE FY 2001-02 BUDGET FOR STREET MAINTENANCE/TRAFFIC SAFETY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 5, 2001. Supplemental letter from Howard Longacre received June 12, 2001. The item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Dunbabin for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the street sweeping contract to California Street Maintenance of Gardena, California, in the amount of $593,853.12 for a period of 36 months beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2004; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the street sweeping contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the budget; and 4) Appropriate an additional $20,500 from prospective expenditures to the FY 2001-02 budget for Street Maintenance/Traffic Safety. Motion Dunbabin, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (n) RECOMMENDATION TO DELETE THE IMPROVEMENT OF ONE CROSSWALK OF SPECIAL PAVING ON BEACH DRIVE AT THE SOUTH END OF THE PROJECT FROM EXHIBIT A OF THE PUBLIC City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10557 • • IMPROVEMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH BEACH HOUSE HOTEL AND WITHHOLD $45,500 OF REIMBURSEMENT, AN . AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated June 4, 2001. Action: To delete the improvement of one crosswalk of special paving on Beach Drive at the south end of the project from Exhibit A of the Public Improvement and Reimbursement Agreement and withhold $45,500 of reimbursement, an amount equivalent to the cost of the improvement. (o) AWARD DOWNTOWN AREA AND CITY PIER CLEANING CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $389,879.96 FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2004; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF. PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE BUDGET; AND, APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $2,800 FROM PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES TO THE FY 2001-02 BUDGET FOR PIER CLEANING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 5, 2001. Supplemental letter from Howard Longacre received June 12, 2001. (p) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the Downtown Area and City Pier Cleaning contract to California Street Maintenance of Gardena, California, in the amount of $389,879 for a period of 36 months beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2004; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Downtown Area and City Pier Cleaning contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the budget; and 4) Appropriate an additional $2,800 from the prospective expenditures to the FY 2001-02 budget for pier cleaning. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE STATUS REPORT ON PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182, MYRTLE AVENUE UNDERGROUNDING, AND PROJECT NO. CIP 97-183, LOMA DRIVE UNDERGROUNDING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 6, 2001. The item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Dunbabin for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10558 (q) Public Works Director Williams responded to Council questions, saying the poles would come down on Myrtle Avenue in mid-July and on Loma Drive in mid-September. Action: To receive and file the status report on Project No. CIP 97-182, Myrtle Avenue Undergrounding, and Project No. CIP 97-183, Loma Drive Undergrounding, as recommended by staff. Motion Dunbabin, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. AWARD DOWNTOWN AND CITY SIDEWALK STEAM CLEANING CONTRACT TO EKLUND BLASTOFF OF TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $91,950.00 FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2004; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY WITHIN THE BUDGET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 7, 2001. Supplemental letter from Howard Longacre received June 12, 2001. The item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Supervisor Flaherty responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jerry Costello California Street Maintenance, suggested pressure washing the area once per week. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the Downtown City Sidewalk Steam Cleaning contract to Eklund Blastoff of Torrance, California, in the amount of $91,950 for a period of 36 months beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2004; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Downtown Area and City Pier Cleaning contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the budget. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10559 • • 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Item(s) 1(e), (I), (m), (p), and (q) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. 2001-2002 BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. a. ADOPTION OF 2001-2002 BUDGET. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 31, 2001. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:30 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jay Russell - Hermosa Beach, said meters that take only quarters were a nuisance; requested that the City install meters that also allowed the use of dimes and nickels as other cities have. The public hearing closed at 8:31 P.M. Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion was subsequently withdrawn. Straw votes on the following issues took place: 1) Raising the hourly parking meter rate from 50 cents to 75 cents passed (Dunbabin, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler in favor); 2) Changing the quarter -only silver meters as they are replaced to meters that take nickels, dimes and quarters passed (Dunbabin, Edgerton, Oakes in favor); and 3) Increasing the parking citations to $25 for street sweeping and $30 for the rest passed (no objections voiced). Action: To increase the hourly parking meter rate from 50 cents to 75 cents as recommended by staff, to increase parking fines to $30 for all violations except street sweeping, which shall be set at $25, and to direct staff to change quarter -only silver meters as they are replaced to meters that accept nickels, dimes and quarters. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10560 Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton. Straw votes on the following issues took place: - 1) Increasing the parking lot hourly rate from 50 cents to 75 cents passed (Dunbabin, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler); and 3) Changing the nighttime parking structure flat rate from $4 after 9 P.M. to $6 after 6 P.M. passed (Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler in favor). Action: To increase the hourly rate in Lot A and the parking structure from 50 cents to 75 cents, as recommended by staff. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Oakes. Action: To change the nighttime flat rate in the parking structure from $4 after 9 P.M. to $6 after 6 P.M., as recommended by staff, subject to a six- month review by the City Council, with direction to keep the arm down as long as possible. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Oakes. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 01-6138, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING PARKING METER RATES, PARKING LOT/PARKING STRUCTURE RATES, PARKING VIOLATION PENALTIES AND ADDING PARKING METER AND PARKING LOT/PARKING STRUCTURE RATES TO THE MASTER SCHEDULE OF SERVICE CHARGES AND FEES," as amended above; 2) Approve parking lot hours of 8 A.M. to 3 A.M., giving the City Manager discretion to make changes for special events/special needs; 3) Approve an amendment to the City Clerk personnel allocation, changing the part-time, temporary Clerk Typist position to a half-time, permanent position at an addition cost of $4,887 for retirement and employee benefits from Prospective Expenditures; 4) Approve amendments/corrections to appropriations as directed at the City Council budget workshop on May 24, 2001; 5) Adopt Resolution No. 01-6139, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL - 'OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002"; and 6) Appropriate funds from the Accrued Compensation Fund, Budget Year 2000-01. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10561 • • The meeting recessed at 9:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:29 P.M., continuing with public hearing item 4. b. ADOPTION OF 2001-2002 APPROPRIATION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 30, 2001. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:30 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 9:30 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01- 6140, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002." Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. THE ORDER OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2001-2002 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2002. Memorandum from Public Works .Director Harold Williams dated May 30,. 2001. Public Works Director Williams presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:32 P.M. As no onecame forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 9:32 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01- 6141, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2001 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2002 IN CONNECTION WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2001-2002." Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE "FALL FESTIVAL", LABOR DAY WEEKEND, SEPTEMBER 1-3, 2001. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 7, 2001. Supplemental letter from Howard Longacre received June 12, 2001. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10562 City Manager Burrell, City Attorney Mike Jenkins and Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: J. Travers Divine - Chamber of Commerce, said the City received $59,000 in fees collected from non -Hermosa Beach vendors at the Memorial Day weekend Fiesta; said the Chamber increased to $28,000 donations to various community charities; proposed a Fall Festival for the Labor Day weekend and an attempt for more participation by families and local merchants by having different events each day on the main stage, theme music, a back -to -school fashion show, restaurant bake -off, line -dancing and clog dancing; noted the free booth space given to 10 local non-profit groups over the Memorial Day weekend, including the Kiwanis and Rotary clubs, St. Patrick's Day and Aloha Days committees, Historical Society, Disabled Veterans, Knights of Columbus, Hermosa Beach Police Officers and Firefighters associations, and the Lifeguards; said the Chamber of Commerce nets between $40,000 and $50,000 per event; Dawn Wendell - Hawthorne Savings, spoke in support of the proposed Labor Day weekend Fall Festival, including extending the event along Hermosa Avenue to 14th Street; Steven Roberts - resident and owner of Cafe Boogaloo, said the Fiesta, especially over Labor Day, presented problems for his customers trying to find evening parking; suggested scheduling the proposed event on a different weekend later in the Fall and looking into other ways to fund the Chamber of Commerce; Steve Ashley - resident and downtown business owner, supported the changes the Chamber proposed but thought the event should be moved to a two-day weekend in the Fall; said the Labor•Day weekend was the last summer weekend; said the Fiestas did not help his business; said the City needed to survey all residents and merchants; Susan Blaco - Hermosa Beach, spoke in support of the Fiestas; saying they were well attended by residents of all age groups; said for the past 10 years she has worked in the Fiesta information booth because it enables her to see a lot of old friends; Rebecca Perry - resident and business owner, said she appreciated the efforts to change the theme of the event but suggested the Fall Festival take place later in the year rather than over the last weekend of summer; said the event impacts her business; Rick Koenig - resident and business owner; said the Kiwanis Club appreciates the ability to raise funds at the Fiesta venues, noting that those funds are then donated by the Kiwanis Club to benefit various worthy groups within the City, which he listed; City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10563 • • Lisa Rider - Hermosa Beach, said she lives six blocks from the beach but her friends could not visit her over Labor Day weekend because of the crowds and lack of parking; suggested a different weekend for the Fall Festival and supported a resident survey; Jay Russell - Hermosa Beach, said the Council should eliminate one of the Chamber of Commerce Fiesta events or at least move one of the events to a two-day weekend; and Debbie Loob - Hermosa Beach, supported getting community input on events; said she wanted one holiday weekend to just go to the beach, without the crowds and blaring loudspeakers. Action: To direct staff to look into and report back on all options concerning the feasibility of placing on the November ballot a measure to increase the City's business license tax as a means to fund the Chamber of Commerce and eliminate the Labor Day weekend event. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Proposed Action: To allow the Labor Day event to take place as it has in the past in its original format rather than using a Fall Festival theme. Motion Mayor Bowler. The motion died for lack of a second. Further Action: To (1) approve the Fall Festival as requested by the Chamber of Commerce; (2) direct staff to meet with Chamber staff and work out the details, including the use of Hermosa Avenue north to 14th Street; (3) approve the use of $3,000 in Prop C funds for the shuttle bus service; and (4) waive application, banner, amplification fees and bill for other services at cost. Motion Edgerton, second Dunbabin. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To direct staff to report back with information on the options for conducting a statistically valid survey to ascertain community opinion on downtown events and perhaps other issues as well. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 10:54 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:07 P.M. 7. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AT 27TH STREET AND OZONE COURT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 7, 2001. Supplemental letters from Ron Felsing received June 12, 2001 and from Jay Mitchell dated June 12, 2001. • City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10564 Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jay Mitchell - property owner, referred to his supplemental submittal; said he went through the process, submitted detailed drawings and the City approved his permit; suggested that he shorten the wall from 42 inches to 36 inches in the triangular area; and Barbara Mathieson - area resident, objected to giving public property for private use; said the City Traffic Engineer said there was a line of sight problem; said the permit would have been rejected by Public Works Department; said there were shrubs as well as a fence. Action: To direct staff to proceed with the issuance of the encroachment permit with the Traffic Engineer's recommendation that the fence be located about five feet from the back of the sidewalk and angled closer to the sidewalk as it goes west, following the line of the street. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried, . noting the dissenting votes of Dunbabin and Edgerton. 8. CONSIDERATION OF SIMILAR USE PROVISION FOR C-3 ZONED PROPERTY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 30, 2001. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To confirm that a bank with drive-thru teller is similar to other uses permitted in the C-3 zone and subject to a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.26.040 of the Zoning Code. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 9. CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF SIGNATURE VERIFICATION OF AN INITIATIVE PETITION PROPOSING TO REPEAL CERTAIN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS AND THEREBY ELIMINATE THE CITY'S UTILITY USERS TAX. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 22, 2001. City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To order a report pursuant to Section 9212 to be presented to the Council at its meeting of July 10, 2001. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10565 • • LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PROPOSED BYLAWS AMENDMENT IN INCREASE DUES TO IMPLEMENT LEAGUE GRASSROOTS NETWORK. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 7, 2001. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the League of California Cities bylaws amendment, which will implement a statewide Grassroots Network to protect local control and reduce the likelihood of City revenues being taken by the State, and direct the City Clerk to record your approval on the attached ballot and forward it to the League of California Cities, as recommended by staff. Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - EXPIRATION OF TERMS - PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION: Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 6, 2001. City Clerk Doerrling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To (1) schedule a meeting at 6 P.M., prior to the meeting of Tuesday, July 24, 2001, for the purpose of interviewing applicants, with appointments to be made at the regular Council meeting of July 24; and (2) to extend the application filing deadline to 6 P.M. Wednesday, July 18, 2001, consistent with recent Council policy, as recommended by staff. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 12:01 A.M., the order of the agenda returned to item 3. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None At 12:19 A.M., the scheduled closed session was continued to the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned in memory of Michael Manse on Wednesday, June 13, 2001, at the hour of 12:20 A.M. to the Regular Meeting on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10566 r 06/0/ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at the hour of 7:11 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Rick Hankus ROLL CALL: Present: Dunbabin, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS - None PRESENTATIONS CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION THE LOS ANGELES BEACH CITIES AREA "AREA OF THE YEAR AWARD" Mayor Bowler read and then presented the Certificate to Daniel Juarez, the Los Angeles Beach Cities Area Director, in recognition of outstanding service to soccer players and excellent training of volunteers within the award-winning Beach Cities area, encompassing the communities of El Segundo, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lennox, Manhattan Beach, Marina Del Rey, Playa Del Rey, Redondo Beach and Westchester. He commended Mr. Juarez and AYSO for their efforts. Area Director Juarez thanked the Mayor for the certificate of recognition and said he appreciated the opportunity to serve. He then introduced Hermosa Beach resident John Dzus, director of Region 18, which covers Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach. Mr. Dzus said the two cities had a large program, with more than 3,000 children participating, and that he was pleased to be taking care of the children in Hermosa Beach and appreciated the City and School District. PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATION TO PAMELA ADAMS "OUTSTANDING CROSSING GUARD OF THE YEAR" Mayor Bowler read the commendation, thanked Ms. Adams for her outstanding service to the children of the community, and extended congratulations to her on being named recipient of the 2000-2001 award. Ms. Adams thanked the Mayor for the commendation and spoke of how much she enjoyed her job as a crossing guard and the children she served. CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2001: Meeting cancelled. City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10567 2a PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Pete Tucker - Hermosa Beach, requested the removal of item 1(h) from the consent calendar (Mayor Bowler announced that the item would be rolled to the next meeting); and Ashley Beck - 569 Third Street, said the former Edison power plant in. Redondo Beach was being retrofitted and expressed concern about the noise coming from the plant late at night. Action: Mayor Bowler directed, with the consensus of the Council, that staff contact the staff of the City of Redondo Beach about the late-night noise concern. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Donley Falkenstein dated June 11, 2001 regarding IMG/Mervyn's Beach Bash 2001. Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file. Motion Dunbabin, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. Letter from Diane Miller, President of the Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach, dated June 16, 2001 requesting the waiver of the $250 banner fee for their 9th Annual Pancake Breakfast. Action: To approve the request of the Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach for waiver of the $250 banner fee for the Club's 9th Annual Pancake Breakfast. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the abstention of Dunbabin, a member of the Woman's Club. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (n), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (g) Reviczky, (i) Edgerton, (k) Reviczky, and (n) Edgerton. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held May 24, 2001; and City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10568 2) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held May 29, 2001. Action: To approve as presented the minutes of the Adjourned Regular meetings of May 24, 2001 and May 29, 2001. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTER NOS. 25437 THROUGH 25569, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NOS. 25443 AND 25502. Action: To ratify the Check Register, as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items, as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE MAY 2001 FINANCIAL REPORTS: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and 3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the May 2001 Financial Reports, as presented. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2001. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of June 5, 2001. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2001. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of June 13, 2001. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATIONS OF $500 FROM BEACH MARKET TO BE USED FOR THE D.A.R.E. PROGRAM AND $324 FROM DOWNEY VENDORS TO BE USED FOR THE COMMUNITY RESOURCES HOCKEY PROGRAM. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated June 19, 2001. (f) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to publicly acknowledge and thank the donors. City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10569 • • Action: To accept donations of $500 from Beach Market for DARE Program; and $324 from Downey Vendors for Community Resources Hockey Program. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE WORK BY LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING INC. FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 99-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION; AND, AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RELEASE PAYMENT TO LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING INC. (5% RETAINED FOR 35 DAYS FOLLOWING FILING OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION). Memorandum from • Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 13, 2001. (i) U) This item was withdrawn from the agenda and will be brought back at the next meeting of July 10, 2001. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEARS 2001-02 THROUGH 2005-06. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 19, 2001. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Williams responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the report. Motion Edgerton, second Dunbabin. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND PURKISS-ROSE - RSI FOR AN INCREASE IN SCOPE OF SERVICES AND CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $25,500; AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST AND THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT UPON APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SCOPE OF WORK AS NECESSARY, NOT TO EXCEED $2,550. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 7, 2001. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Purkiss-Rose - RSI for an increase in scope of services and contract amount of $25,500; City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10570 1) Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said agreement, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to make adjustments to the scope of work as necessary, not to exceed $2,550. (k) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE NORTHEAST HERMOSA BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC STUDY AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 18, 2001. (I) (m) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Williams responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the Request for Proposals for the northeast Hermosa Beach neighborhood traffic study and authorize staff to solicit proposals, as recommended by the Public Works Commission and staff. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 19, 2001. Action: To receive and file the actions minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of June 19, 2001. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION, WHICH, CONSISTENT WITH PAST POLICY, ESTABLISHES A 200 -WORD LIMIT AND REQUIRES CANDIDATES TO PAY ALL ASSOCIATED COSTS WITH REGARD TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS FOR THE NOVEMBER 6, 2001 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 7, 2001. Action: To approve the recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01-6142, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2001." (n) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY A CLAIM FILED BY PHILLIPS PETROLEUM, ET AL. AND REFER IT TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated June 21, 2001. City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10571 This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Attorney Jenkins responded to Council questions and the request that the Cal -Compact case be placed on the next closed session agenda. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Date of Loss: Date Filed: Allegation: Motion Edgerton, second Phillips Petroleum, et al 1959-1965 06-05-01 Costs associated with landfill cleanup (Cal -Compact Landfill, Carson, CA) Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(g), (i), (k), and (n) were. heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. At 7:30 P.M., after acting on item 1(g), the order of the agenda was suspended to go to public hearing item 4. Items 1(I), (k) and (n) were considered later in the meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. A REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PARKING PLAN TO EXPAND AN EXISTING RESTAURANT 468 SQUARE FEET INTO THE ADJACENT COMMERCIAL SPACE, WITHOUT ADDITIONAL PARKING, AT 959 AVIATION BOULEVARD, "OCEAN DINER." Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated June 19, 2001. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell and City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:51 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10572 Denny Dunlap - appellant, said he and his neighbors were concerned about the overflow parking that would be created by the diner's expansion and its impact on residential streets; said parking on 10th Street, Ocean Drive, Owosso Avenue and Bonnie Brae Street was already impacted by many of the diner's employees, who were parked all day, and its customers, who park there and in the parking lots of other Aviation Boulevard businesses, and then cross the street at the signal to get to the diner; Rick Hankus - applicant, said he owned the diner for about 14 years and never had off-street parking until he purchased the building two years ago and removed the barbed wire fencing that had been surrounding, the parking area; said the expansion would primarily enlarge the kitchen, and would also add four additional tables and two handicap bathrooms, but would not require the hiring of additional staff; said Aviation Boulevard allowed only one-hour parking Monday through Saturday; said he was willing to put in as much parking as possible and would put up a sign indicating there was parking in the rear; Lisa Peterson - Hermosa Beach, said she doubted there was room for extra parking in the rear lot; said she had no problem parking her minivan on Aviation Boulevard when she drove to the diner; Jeannine Bone - Hermosa Beach, said her street was filled with parked cars for the diner, especially on weekends, sometimes parked too close to her driveway, making it difficult for her to back her car out of the garage onto the street; Craig O'Rourke - Hermosa Beach, said he never had a problem with parking for the diner and thought the extra tables would eliminate some of the wait for seating in the diner and thereby free up parking by shortening the time cars were parked; Gavin Seacamp - Hermosa Beach, said he has been neighbor of the diner for five years and has never been impacted by parking problems; Jack Leland - Hermosa Beach business owner, said this was a busy eating establishment, noting that good business was important to the City; said parking was a problem everywhere, including in the area of his business on Ardmore Avenue; Kathleen Nilsen - Hermosa Beach, expressed parking concerns; said there was no room on the residential streets for any more cars due to the impacts created by this business and others on Aviation Boulevard; asked if there was a bike rack at the diner; Tony Gingiss - Redondo Beach, said he was a frequent customer of the diner for nearly 10 years and never parked on residential streets; said this was a good business and noted that parking was difficult in all of the South Bay; Sean Berry - Hermosa business owner, spoke in support of expanding the diner; said there were parking problems all over the City; City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10573 • • Bert Jones - Hermosa Beach, small business owner and frequent customer of the diner; spoke in support of the request, noting that the expansion would not add any additional employees; Cathy McCurdy - Hermosa Beach, said she understood the parking concerns of the neighbors, but thought the impact was from other businesses, not the diner; and Diane Bible - Hermosa Beach, said she had been a customer of the diner since it opened and has never parked across the street in the residential area; said the expansion would not increase the parking problem. The public hearing closed at 8:29 P.M. Proposed Action: To approve the expansion of Ocean Diner based on the fact that there was no parking on record as being part of this land and use in existence and the parking plan meets the requirements of staff in the staff report, with the additional condition that the applicant install bike racks if the diner does not already have them. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion was subsequently withdrawn. Proposed Action: To direct staff to report back on the hours for parking along Aviation Boulevard and to work with the applicant on the parking layout behind the business, with a look at using some of it for employee parking. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion was subsequently withdrawn. Proposed Action: To determine that the applicant does not need a parking plan, thereby vacating the Planning Commission decision and allowing the proposed expansion without a parking plan. Motion Oakes. The motion died due to .the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To approve the parking plan to allow the expansion with a minimum of five parking stalls and the inclusion of bicycle racks. Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. The motion was subsequently withdrawn. Proposed Action: To not follow the Planning Commission recommendation on the basis that the parking lot need only to provide at least three spaces as required for the expansion. Motion Edgerton. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To approve the parking plan as presented to allow the requested expansion. Motion Oakes. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01- 6143, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10574 i • PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPEAL A PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT (ALLOWING THE CHANGE OF USE OF 468 SQUARE FEET OF ADJACENT COMMERCIAL SPACE TO RESTAURANT USE) WITH NO ADDITIONAL PARKING AT 959 AVIATION BOULEVARD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 9, EXCLUDING THE NORTHERLY 10 FEET, TRACT 6917," as amended to require a minimum of three parking spaces in the rear, that being the net parking requirement that will run with the land, and to require on-site bicycle racks and signage advising customers that parking was available in the rear. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To refer the issue of Aviation Boulevard parking regulations to the Public Works Commission for review and recommendation. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REVIEW DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ORDERING SAID DELINQUENT CHARGES BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. THE ASSESSMENT WOULD AFFECT ONLY THOSE PROPERTIES WITH REFUSE BILLS DELINQUENT AS OF APRIL 30, 2001. Memorandum from City Manager Steve Burrell dated June 12, 2001. Supplemental information submitted by the City Manager's office June 26, 2001. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:40 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 9:40 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 01- 6144, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES." Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 9:41 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:58 P.M. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. PRESENTATION OF ADOPT -A -STORM DRAIN PROGRAM. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated June 18, 2001. City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10575 Public Works Director Williams presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, saying that the Public Works Commission would review everything before it comes back to Council, including proposed signage design and placement. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Paul Polizzotto - representative of Adopt -A -Storm Drain Program, said this was a non-profit organization that helps cities raise funds through corporate sponsorships for needed projects and to meet the more stringent requirements, working the same way as the Adopt -A -Highway program; said 80 percent of the proceeds raised would go directly to the City, with the remaining 20 percent going to help the group and its efforts. Action: To accept the presentation and authorize staff to proceed and discuss appropriate sponsor recognition, as recommended by staff. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7. LAX MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT COMMENTS FROM SOUTH BAY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated June 14, 2001. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to prepare a letter responding to the LAX Master Plan Expansion Environmental Impact Report. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 8. CALLING, GIVING NOTICE AND REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION AND CERTAIN OTHER RESOLUTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, NOVEMBER 6, 2001. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 19, 2001. City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt: 1) Resolution No. 01-6145, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2001, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES"; City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10576 �r s 2) Resolution No. 01-6146, entitled ."A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2001. WITH THE UDEL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE"; 3) Resolution No. 01-6147, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001";and 4) Resolution No. 01-6148, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION FOR ELECTIVE OFFICES IN THE EVENT OF A TIE VOTE AT A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 6, 2001." Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER LETTER AGREEMENT EXTENDING BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES' CONTRACT ON A MONTH-TO-MONTH BASIS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated June 21, 2001. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the letter agreement extending the existing contract under its current terms and conditions on a month-to-month basis, as recommended by staff. Motion Dunbabin, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 10:25 P.M., the order of the agenda returned to item 3. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL None 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 22. 2001. City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10577 i • 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 11th Street and The Strand Longfellow Avenue and The Strand Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell TyCom Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. a. Initiation of Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(c) Number of Potential Cases: 1 b. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Currell v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YC037936 Name of Case: Macpherson v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: BC172546 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at the hour of 10:40 P.M. to a closed session. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - The Closed Session convened at the hour of 10:52 P.M. At the hour 11:52 P.M., the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular • Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS - There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at the hour of 11:53 P.M. to the Regular Meeting on Tuesday, July 10, 2001, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. City Council Minutes 06-26-01 Page 10578 July 10, 2001 Regular Meeting July 10, 2001 Mayor and Members Of the City Council SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTES OF JUNE 12, 2001- ITEM 2A(1) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the minutes of the meeting of June 12, 2001, revised as shown on the attached page 10561 to reflect the dissenting vote of Councilmember Dunbabin on the action to "change the nighttime flat rate in the parking structure from $4 after 6 P.M., subject to " (located directly above the action to adopt the two resolutions). Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2am Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton. Straw votes on the following issues took place: 1) Increasing the parking lot hourly rate from 50 cents to 75 cents passed (Dunbabin, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler); and 3) Changing the nighttime parking structure flat rate from $4 after 9 P.M. to $6 after 6 P.M. passed (Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler in favor). Action: To increase the hourly rate in Lot *A and the parking structure from 50 cents to 75 cents, as recommended by staff. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Oakes. Action: To change the nighttime flat rate in the parking structure from $4 after 9 P.M. to $6 after 6 P.M., as recommended by staff, subject to a six- month review by the City Council, with direction to keep the arm down as long as possible. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Dunbabin and Oakes. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 01-6138, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING PARKING METER RATES, PARKING LOT/PARKING STRUCTURE RATES, PARKING VIOLATION . PENALTIES AND ADDING PARKING METER AND PARKING LOT/PARKING STRUCTURE RATES TO THE MASTER SCHEDULE OF SERVICE CHARGES AND FEES," as amended above; 2) Approve parking lot hours of 8 A.M. to 3 A.M., giving the City Manager discretion to make changes for special events/special needs; 3) Approve an amendment to the City Clerk personnel allocation, changing the part-time, temporary Clerk Typist position to a half-time, permanent position at an addition cost of $4,887 for retirement and employee benefits from Prospective Expenditures; 4) Approve amendments/corrections to appropriations as directed at the City Council budget workshop on May 24, 2001; 5) Adopt Resolution No. 01-6139, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002"; and 6) Appropriate funds from the Accrued Compensation Fund, Budget Year 2000-01. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 06-12-01 Page 10561 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 06/20/01 07:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS XcL-D—t?_7 7A/0/ • PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ - CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 25570 06/20/01 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 001-1103 253,661.55 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 105-1103 6,338.92 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 109-1103 999.42 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 110-1103 26,431.64 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 115-1103 1,264.03 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 117-1103 613.16 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 126-1103 1,216.13 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 140-1103 93.82 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 145-1103 1,129.17 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 150-1103 48.13 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 152-1103 32.94 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 160-1103 7,258.48. PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 301-1103 405.37 PAYROLL/6-1. TO 6-15-01 705-1103 2,424.59 PAYROLL/6-1 TO 6-15-01 715-1103 4,558.32 306,475.67 TOTAL CHECKS 306,475.67 2b VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 06/20/01 07:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 253,661.55 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 6,338.92 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 999.42 110 PARKING FUND 26,431.64 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1,264.03 117 AB939 FUND 613.16 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 1,216.13 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT .93.82 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,129.17 150 GRANTS FUND , 48.13 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 32.94 160 SEWER FUND 7,258.48 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 405.37 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,424.59 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 4,558.32 TOTAL 306,475.67 a PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 06/21/01 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 25571 25572 25573 25574 06/21/01 010810 06/21/01 000935 06/21/01 006827 06/21/01 006100 25575 06/21/01 006409 25576 06/21/01 010962 25577 06/21/01 000155 25578 06/21/01 003372 25579 06/21/01 000262 25580 06/21/01 005935 25581 06/21/01 000016 VENDOR NAME ACE FENCE COMPANY ADVANCED ELECTRONICS ALL CITY MANAGEMENT ARCUS DATA SECURITY BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS' TERESE BORGSTROM BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTR CA EMS PERSONNEL FUND CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVI CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT CALIFORNIA WATER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION COMMUNITY CENTER FENCE IMPROVE EQUIPMENT MAINT/JUNE 2001 SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV OFFSITE STORAGE/MAY 2001 ASPHALT PURCHASE/MAY 2001 UNDERGOUNDING ASSIST/818 LOMA TRASH REMOVAL/JUNE 2001 TRASH REMOVAL/JUNE 2001 EMS PARAMEDIC RENEWAL/POWERS NAME PLATE/COPELAND DOWNTOWN CLEANING/MAY 2001 PIER PRESSURE WASHING/MAY 2001 STREET SWEEPING/MAY 2001 . SERVIC WATER BILLING/MAY 2001 WATER BILLING/MAR 2001 WATER BILLING/APRIL 2001 WATER BILLING/MARCH 2001 RECYCLED WATER/MARCH 2001 RECYCLED WATER/APRIL 2001 RETROFIT FINANCE CHARGE/4/2001 RETROFIT FINANCE CHARGE/3/2001 WATER BILLING/MAY 2001 WATER BILLING/MAY 2001 WATER BILLING/MAY 2001 WATER BILLING/MAY 2001 25582 06/21/01 000634 CHEVRON USA, INC. 25583 06/21/01 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION 25584 06/21/01 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY 25585: 06/21/01 005595 COACH USA 25586 06/21/01 000325 COAST GLASS COMPANY 25587 06/21/01 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 25588 06/21/01 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE GAS PURCHASE/MAY 2001 UNIFORM RENTAL/MAY 2001 UNIFORM RENTAL/JUNE 2001 TONER PURCHASE/JUNE 2001 TRANSPORTATION/SENIORS LIGHT FIXTURE/END OF PIER FILE CABINET OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE 2001 EMPLOYMENT AD/MAY 2001 3 ACCOUNT NUMBER 125-8627-4201 110-3302-4201 001-2102-4201 715-1206-4201 001-3104-4309 140-4706-4201 109-3304-4201 109-3301-4201 001-2201-4315 001-1202-4305 109-3301-4201 001-3104-4201 001-3104-4201 001-4202-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4202-4303 - 001-4202-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4202-4304 001-4202-4304 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4204-4303 109-3304-4303 715-2101-4310 001-4202-4187 001-4202-4187 001-2101-4305 145-3409-4201 105-2601-4309 001-4601-5401 001-2101-4305 001-1203-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 10,035.00 174.70 2,719.75 266.00 115.14 1,980.00 127.67 255.34 130.00 21.60 8,230.00 2,325.00 12,200.00 861.18 505.82 361.75 123.25 174.37 323.98 231.35 124.51 849.94 3,728.60 639.44 109.73 40.29 105.58 108.47 300.98 638.28 27.00 449.06 182.83 207.72 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 10,035.00 174.70 2,719.75 266.00 115.14 1,980.00 383.01 130.00 21.60 22,755.00 8,033.92 40.29 214.05 300.98 638.28 27.00 631.89 207.72 VOUCHRE2 06/21/01 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 25589 06/21/01 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DMV RECORDS RETRIEVAL/MAY 2001 25590 06/21/01 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA SHELTER SERVICES/MAY 2001 25591 06/21/01 000364 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTING/RICKS FINGERPRINTING/MOSLEY 25592 06/21/01 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT SIGNAL MAINT/APRIL 2001 25593 06/21/01 006178 DOMINO COMPUTER CENTER 25594 06/21/01 25595 06/21/01 25596 06/21/01 25597 06/21/01 010534 MARGARET EDELMAN 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 010709 FIRE MASTER 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES 25598 06/21/01 007115 GILLIS & ASSOCIATES ARC 25599 06/21/01 008803 GOLD GRAPHICS 25600 06/21/01 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. 25601 06/21/01 004108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SER 25602 06/21/01 003432 HOME DEPOT/GECF 25603 06/21/01 005356 JOHN HUNTER & ASSOC. 25604 06/21/01 005204 ICE CHALET 25605 06/21/01 001399 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS PAINT PURCHASE/MAY 2001 PAINT PURCHASE/JUNE 2001 25606 06/21/01 010839 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP TECHNOLOGY PLAN/MAY 2001 TECHNOLOGY PLAN/MAY 2001 25607 06/21/01 006293 KINKO'S INC. SPECIFICATION BOOKS COPIED COMPUTER REPAIRS/BASE 3 COMPUTER PURCHASE/JUNE 2001 COMPUTER REPAIRS/CM/JUNE 2001 LANDSCAPE CONSULTATION EXPRESS MAIL/MAY 2001 FIRE ALARM SECURITY CHECK LIABILITY TRUST ACCOUNT/MAY 01 ARCHITECT FEES/MAY 2001 INSTALLATION & REMOVAL US FLAG INSTALLATION & REMOVAL US FLAG TEMP BUILD INSPECT/6/4-6/14/01 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/6/1-6/8 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 PLANTING MATERIALS/MAY 2001 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/MAY 2001 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/MAY 2001- MORTER MIX PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY- 2001 MUNICIPAL STORM:WATER.PROGRAM MUNICIPAL STORM WATER PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 2001 y ACCOUNT. NUMBER 110-1204-4201 110-3302-4251 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4201 105-2601-4251 715-1206-5401 715-1206-5402 715-1206-5401 105-2601-4201 001-4601-4305 001-4204-4321 705-1209-4324 127-8622-4201 109-3301-4319 001-1101-4201 001-4201-4201 705-1217-4324 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 105-2601-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 105-2601-4309 001-2201-4309 160-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 715-1206-4201 715-1206-4201 001-4202-4201 PAGE 2 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 440.93 440.93 145.24 145.24 32.00 64.00 96.00 1,611.89 1,611.89 245.12 1,397.52 391.12 2,033.76 500.00 500.00 17.04 17.04 210.00 210.00 4,955.07 4,955.07 2,260.35 2,260.35 450.00 450.00 900.00 5,211.50 5,211.50 14,133.08 14,133.08 98.44 92.02 60.05 38.42 55.11 43.98 26.97 414.99 2,500.00 5,432.00 7,932.00 50.40 50.40 90.18 87.19 177.37 659.66 773.80 1,433.46 1,035.45 1,035.45 VOUCHRE2 06/21/01 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 25608 06/21/01 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 25609 06/21/01 005072 LINE MASTER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DRYWALL PURCHASE/JUNE 2001 PAINT/STENCIL TRUCK 25610 06/21/01 010802 M.A. FRANCIS & ASSOCIAT ELECTRIC/PLUMBING TEMP OFFICES 25611 06/21/01 001911 MEDICAL INSTITUTE 25612 06/21/01 010668 MOBIL FLEET/GECC EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAMS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 GAS CARD PURCHASES/MAY 2001 GAS CARD PURCHASE/MAY 2001 25613 06/21/01 010566 MORGAN WHOLESALE ELECTR BREAKERS/CLARK STADIUM LIGHTS DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 25614 06/21/01 010961 NEXT DAY SIGNS 25615 06/21/01 009854 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 25616 06/21/01 004142 OFFICE DEPOT 25617 06/21/01 000321 PACIFIC BELL 25618 25619 25620 06/21/01 000491 06/21/01 009694 06/21/01 008482 25621 06/21/01 008364 25622 06/21/01 009356 25623 06/21/01 008760 25624 06/21/01 010751 PACIFIC SCREEN PRINT PICKENS FUEL CORP PMX MEDICAL SPECIALTY PVP COMMUNICATIONS,INC. QUALITY SILKSCREEN R.P. ASSOCIATES FIREWORKS PROHIBITED SIGNS CELL PHONE USAGE/MAY 2001 TONER FOR FAX MACHINE COMPURTER HOOK-UPS/JUNE 2001 COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/JUNE 2001 COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/JUNE 2001 SILK SCREENED SWEATSHIRTS NATURAL GAS PURCHASES/MAY 2001 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT HELMET & KIT/INSTALLED T-SHIRTS SILK SCREENED UNIFORM T-SHIRTS RALPH STONE & COMPANY, ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4204-4309 715-3104-5403 001-8622-4201 001-1203-4320 715-2101-4310 715-2201-4310 715-4201-4310 715-4202-4310 715-3302-4310 715-3104-4310 715-4601-4310 715-2601-4310 715-3102-4310 715-4206-4310 001-1250 715-1236 715-2201-4310 001-4202-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-2201-4305 001-4202-4304 001-4202-4305 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4187 715-4204-4310 001-2201-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4187 001-4601-4308 001-2201-5401 115-8144-4201 115-8144-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 36.05 69,199.22. 9,378.20 1,297.00 2,734.72 95.80 126.05 353.90 348.65 342.03 104.79 227.65 137.10 35.89 109.90 130.65 27.79 642.00 6.00 6.00- 1,424.38 713.40 60.48 3.40 3.52 57.29 905.25 20.48 331.57 37.39 677.60 257.55 367.20 808.50 200.55 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 36.05 69,199.22 9,378.20 1,297.00 4,774.92 642.00 1,424.38 713.40 60.48 64.21 905.25 20.48 368.96 677.60 257.55 367.20 VOUCHRE2 06/21/01 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 25625 06/21/01 25626 06/21/01 25627 06/21/01 25628 06/21/01 25629 06/21/01 25630 06/21/01 25631 06/21/01 25632 06/21/01 25633 06/21/01 25634 06/21/01 25635 06/21/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 008871 LYN RILEY, EMS EDUCATIO 009656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 010860 SMARDON SUPPLY 000113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUI 008812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBL 009532 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 009769 SUPERIOR ELECTRICAL ADV 010957 SWINTEC WEST 010529 RUSSELL TINGLEY 009078 TRUGREEN LAND CARE REGI 000015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA • 25636 06/21/01 003353 VISA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ENGINEERING SERVICES MANDATED TRAINING/JUNE 2001 DESTRUCTION SERVICES/JUNE 2001 DRINKING FOUNTAINS RECHARGE EXTINGUISHER/JUNE 01 2 WAY RADIO USAGE/2000 CELL PHONE PURCHASE OVERHEAD PROJECTOR PURCHASE AD CHANGER/THEATER MARQUEE CALCULATOR PURCHASE REIMBURSE REGISTRATION INSTALLATION OF TIFGREEN SOD. PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2001 FAX BILLING/MAY 2001 FAX BILLING/MAY 2001 FAX BILLING/MAY 2001 FAX BILLING/MAY 2001 FAX BILLING/MAY 2001 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2001 MANAGEMENT RETREAT/MAY 2001 GAS PURCHASES/GAINS 25637 06/21/01 006098 WONDRIES FLEET DIVISION LIFT GATE NEW ECONOLINE VAN 25638 06/21/01 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 ACCOUNT NUMBER 121-8144-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 001-4202-5402 001-2201-4309 001-4202-4304 001-2101-4305 001-8622-5401 001-4601-4308 110-1204-5401 001-2201-4317 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4304 110-3302-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4204-4321 001-2201-4304 001-4601-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4201-4304 109-3304-4304 110-1204-4304 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-2101-4304 001-1203-4317 715-2101-4310 715-4601-5403 001-1202-4305 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4317 001-2201-4305 001-2201-4309 PAGE 4 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 128.40 1,137.45 1,250.00 1,250.00 75.00 75.00 3,758.21 3,758.21 22.00 22.00 239.73 129.59 369.32 485.99 485.99 169.86 169.86 244.02 244.02 174.00 174.00 1,618.00 1,618.00 260.00 64.74 1,260.31 60.97 196.47 59.56 117.43 71.93 32.88 32.57 15.69 9.08 2.29 21.55 39.70 40.96 2,286.13 4,405.67 54.30 4,459.97 2,619.00 2,619.00 100.00 40.52 15.96 77.80 36.01 17.26 VOUCHRE2 06/21/01 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 25639 06/21/01 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/5/21-6/11 JURY DUTY MILES/V. BALVIN JURY DUTY MILES/M. HALL SIGN MAKING MATERIALS SIGN PURCHASE/MAY 2001 SIGN MAKING MATERIALS PARKING SIGNS/JUNE 2001 PARKING SIGNS/MAY 2001 TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4101-4305 001-4101-4317 001-4202-4317 001-4601-4305 001-4601-4308 001-3904 001-3904 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 18.13 80.00 2.00 42.93 58.30 18.75 7.20 2,062.79 281.88 172.11 412.13 892.94 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 514.86 3,821.85 205,425.42 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 06/21/01 17:58 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 68,361.98 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 3,092.86 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 9,205.62 110 PARKING FUND 1,102.20 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1,009.05 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 128.40 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 10,035.00 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,260.35 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 1,980.00 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 638.28 160 SEWER FUND 7,932.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 19,088.15 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 80,591.53 TOTAL 205,425.42 PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 06/28/01 18:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS 025646 VOID PAGE 1 VOUCHRE2 66/28/01 18:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 25640 06/28/01 007251 BARRY AGOVINO 25641 06/28/01 010977 TED ALEXAKOS 25642 06/28/01 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 25643 06/28/01 004447 JOHN D. ANDREN 25644 06/28/01 009484 APWA 25645 06/28/01 005179 AT&T 25647 06/28/01 010966 LLOYD BARCROFT 25648 06/28/01 000252 BEACH TRAVEL 25649 06/28/01 009845 KATHARINE BERGSTROM 25650 06/28/01 008031 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR 25651 06/28/01 008937 DAVID BIZUB CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE CITATION REFUND SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV/6/3-16/01 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL MANUAL LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB, APR, MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY CHARGES/FEB,APR,MAY 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 CITATION REFUND 0300042503 AIRFARE/TINGLEY/5/20 & 6/1/01 AIRFARE/COPELAND/6/20/01 DEPOSIT REFUND/PETITION FIRST AMENDMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT REFUND FORFEIT FEE/SPRING 01 25652 06/28/01 008522 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC. MEDICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 2001 25653 06/28/01 010277 LARRY BRYANT 25654 06/28/01 008585 AARON BUSH 25655 06/28/01 008811 DIANE CLEARY 25656 06/28/01 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE CLASS REIMBURSEMENT/11/27-12/1 MINUTES TRANSCRIPTION/MAY 2001 MICR TONER/JUNE 2001 Id ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-3105 110-3302 001-2102-4201 105-3105 001-4202-4317 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 110-3302 001-2201-4317 001-1202-4317 001-2110 115-8144-4201 121-8144-4201 146-8144-4201 150-8144-4201 001-2111 001-2201-4309 105-3105 001-2201-4315 001-4101-4201 001-1202-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 24.61 20.00 3,013.00 24.61 127.00 2.35 .59 1.18 9.41 10.00 22.94 14.71 15.29 1.18 177.63 75.29 10.59 17.06 118.82 67.64 11.76 31.76 28.00 441.50 171.50 200.00 2,160.00 5,000.00 4,497.50 2,512.50 25.00 5.99 24.61 130.00 220.00 163.77 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 24.61 20.00 3,013.00 24.61 127.00 588.20 28.00 613.00 200.00 14,170.00 25.00 5.99 24.61 130.00 220.00 163.77 VOUCHRE2 06/28/01 18:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 25657 06/28/01 000325 COAST GLASS COMPANY 25658 06/28/01 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION GLASS REPAIRS/JAIL/6/2001= WINDOW REPAIRS/JUNE 2001 009614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SER 300' NOTICING/JUNE 2001 PREPARE/MAIL APPEAL NOTICE JULY 4TH LETTERS MAILED REFUND/PARAMEDIC TRANSPORT RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 25659 06/28/01 010976 EDITH CORDER 25660 06/28/01 010974 SANDRA COYTE 25661 06/28/01 009823 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUB EPA MANIFEST FEES 25662 06/28/01 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL JANITORIAL JANITORIAL JANITORIAL JANITORIAL JANITORIAL JANITORIAL JANITORIAL 25663 06/28/01 008773 ANTHONY FERRANTE 25664 06/28/01 003169 STEVE FILLMAN 25665 06/28/01 009531 FIRSTLINE, LLC SERVICES/MAY 2001 SERVICES/MAY 2001 SERVICE/MAY 2001 SERVICES/MAY 2001 SERVICES/MAY 2001 SERVICES/MAY 2001 SERVICES/MAY 2001 SERVICES/MAY 2001 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 2001 MEDICAL GLOVES PURCHASE/6/01 25666 06/28/01 010978 FORTUNATO ELECTRIC INC. UNDERGROUND ASSISTANCE/LOMA DR 25667 06/28/01 008652 MICHAEL GAROFANO 25668 06/28/01 010971 JASON GRAY CLASS REIMBURSEMENT REFUND FORFEIT FEES/SPRING 01 25669 06/28/01 008576 HEC RAMSEY ENTERPRISES GUEST EVENT PARKING PERMITS 25670 06/28/01 005356 JOHN HUNTER & ASSOC. 25671 06/28/01 009789 HYDRO-SCAPE 25672 06/28/01 001399 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS PAINT PURCHASE/JUNE 2001 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN MUNICIPAL STORM WATER PROGRAM MUNICIPAL STORM WATER PROGRAM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER 25673 06/28/01 006440 JOBTRAK 25674 06/28/01 003373 RUSSELL WALTER JOHNSON 25675 06/28/01 000973 JEANETTE KARCHER EMPLOYMENT AD/CAMP COUNSELOR OVER THE LINE TOURNAMENT 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE 11 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4101-4201 001-4101-4201 001-2101-4305 001-3840 001-2111 715-4206-4251 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 105-3105 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4309 140-4706-4201 001-2201-4315 001-2111 110-1204-4305 160-3102-4201 160-3102-4201 001-4202-4201 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-1203-4201 001-4601-4221 105-3105 ITEM AMOUNT 100.00 126.00 998.00 225.00 800.00 9.40 62.00 203.50 750.00 1,200.00 950.00 290.00 365.00 3,370.00 325.00 195.00 24.61 318.50 51.30 711.00 230.00 50.00 377.16 1,990.00 3,530.00 210.51 61.42 1.26 1.26- 195.00 350.00 24.61 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 226.00 2,023.00 9.40 62.00 203.50 7,445.00 24.61 318.50 51.30 711.00 230.00 50.00 377.16 5,520.00 210.51 61.42 195.00 350.00 24.61 VOUCHRE2 06/28/01 18:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 25676 06/28/01 010969 JC KAWALEC 25677 06/28/01 005358 KUSTOM SIGNALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND FORTEIT FEES/SPRING 01 BATTERIES FOR RADAR GUNS 25678 06/28/01 007859 L.A. CO METRO TRANS AUT BUS PASS SALES/JUNE 2001 25679 06/28/01 005129 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMOR LEGAL BILLING/MAY 2001 25680 06/28/01 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI PATIENT SERVICES/MICHLER/5/01 PATIENT SERVICES/HENDRICKS/5/0 25681 06/28/01 010156 LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING CITATION REFUND 25682 06/28/01 010671 JANET MCDONALD 25683 06/28/01 007410 KATHRYN MILSTEAD 25684 06/28/01 010968 MICHAEL MORGAN 25685 06/28/01 006955 WILLIAM NIEMANN 25686 06/28/01 002487 PAGENET, INC. 25687 06/28/01 010139 PARKING CONCEPTS INC. 25688 06/28/01 25689 06/28/01 25690 06/28/01 25691 06/28/01 25692 06/28/01 009705 JAMES PATTON 007158 PEEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL 009470 BRENDA PETERSON 008482 PMX MEDICAL SPECIALTY 000097 POSTMASTER REFUND FORFEIT FEE/SPRING 2001 CAMP REFUND/SUMMER 2001 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE PAGER PAGER PAGER PAGER PAGER PAGER PAGER PAGER PAGER PAGER SERVICE/MAY 2001 SERVICE/MAY 2001 SERVICE/MAY 2001 SERVICE/MAY 2001 . SERVICE/MAY 2001 SERVICE/JUNE 2001 SERVICE/JUNE 2001 SERVICE/JUNE 2001 SERVICE/JUNE 2001 SERVICE/JUNE 2001 PK STRUCTURE MANAGEMENT/MAY 01 LOT A MANAGEMENT/MAY 2001 REFUND FORFEIT FEES/SPRING 01 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRS/5/31/01 TYPESETTING SUMMER BROCHURE MEDICAL SUPPLIES/JUNE 2001 P.O. BOX 695 ANNUAL RENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2111 001-2101-4307 145-3403-4251 001-1203-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 110-3302 001-2111 001-2111 110-3302 105-3105 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4201 109-3304-4201 109-3305-4201 001-2111 105-2601-4201 001-4601-4302 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4201 25693 06/28/01 000740 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE BULK MAIL POSTAGE/PUB NOTICES 001-2114 25694 06/28/01 008364 PVP COMMUNICATIONS,INC. MICROPHONE ADAPTER 25695 06/28/01 008731 RUTH RASK 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE 11 001-2101-4307 105-3105 ITEM AMOUNT 50.00 442.00 96.00 282.00 35.00 35.00 20.00 50.00 520.00 10.00 26.64. 101.23 2.50 52.50 30.00 2.50 90.44 2.50 17.50 30.00 2.50 13,168.58 8,523.97 50.00 193.20 2,988.50 58.53 55.00 1,121.22 89.00 24.61 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 50.00 442.00 96.00 282.00 70.00 20.00 50.00 520.00 10.00 26.64 331.67 21,692.55 50.00 193.20 2,988.50 58.53 55.00 1,121.22 89.00 24.61 VOUCHRE2 06/28/01 18:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 25696 06/28/01 009824 REGISTRAR RECORDER/CO.0 SIGNATURE VERIFICATION 25697 06/28/01 010970 RICK ROBERTS 25698 06/28/01 008704 RX LASER, INC 25699 06/28/01 010967 BARRY SMITH 25700 06/28/01 000343 SO CAL ASSOCIATION OF G 25701 06/28/01 010960 SOUTH BAY AUTO UPHOLSTE 25702 06/28/01 000113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUI 25703 06/28/01 000118 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COU 25704 06/28/01 000159 25705 06/28/01 005195 25706 06/28/01 010158 25707 06/28/01 010972 25708 06/28/01 008152 25709 06/28/01 000123 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STANDARD CONCRETE PRODU STEVENS-GARLAND ASSOCIA CHRIS STOTEN CAROL TANNER TRIANGLE HARDWARE • REFUND FORFEIT FEES/SPRING 01 LASER CHECK FORMS REFUND DUMPSTER PERMIT MEMBERSHIP DUES/H. WILLIAMS AUTO SEAT REUPHOLSTERED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS CITATION SUR CHARGES STREET LIGHTING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/APRIL 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 MEYER CAN FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAR 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/APRIL 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 2001 CONCRETE/1001 1ST STREET/6/01 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/9/00-4/01 WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 2000 ASSESSMENT REBATE HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 13 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1121-4251 001-2111 001-1202-4305 001-3815 001-4202-4315 715-3302-4311 001-4204-4309 110-3302 105-2601-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4303 105-2601-4303 160-3102-4303 105-2601-4303 105-2601-4303 001-3104-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4204-4303 105-2601-4303 109-3304-4303 109-3304-4303 001-3104-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3104-4201 001-2110 105-3105 160-3102-4309 001-4202-4309 105-2601-4309 715-2101-4311 715-4206-4311 001-3104-4309 001-4202-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 185.28 50.00 112.20 48.00 255.00 50.00 149.04 16,927.00 9,216.87 5,879.35 1,790.67 35.65 118.95 247.91 254.44 1,018.00 345.06 13.39 154.78 21.58 206.76 18.75 144.12 1,796.29 63.92 292.24 1.50 1.50- 7,740.00 1,600.00 49.22 52.80 119.69 251.00 19.81 21.38 231.00 102.64 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 185.28 50.00 112.20 48.00 255.00 50.00 149.04 16,927.00 21,326.49 292.24 7,740.00 1,600.00 49.22 VOUCHRE2 06/28/01 18:11 VOUCHER/ - CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 25710 06/28/01 008097 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNI 25711 06/28/01 000015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 25712 06/28/01 010965 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. 25713 06/28/01 003209 VERIZON WIRELESS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2001' DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN SAFEKEEPING FEES/MAY 2001 PHONE BILL/JUNE 2001 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND CELL PHONE USAGE MAY 2001 TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-1141-4201 001-2101-4304 001-3115 001-2101-4304 ITEM AMOUNT 28.20 466.19 143.65 143.65- 291.67 216.91 770.32 300.81 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 1,292.71 291.67 216.91 770.32 300.81 117,298.61 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 06/28/01 18:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 44,374.89 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 10,933.35 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 23,552.76 110 PARKING FUND 17,453.88 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 2,160.00 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 5,000.00 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 711.00 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 96.00 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 4,497.50 150 GRANTS FUND 2,512.50 160 SEWER FUND 5,691.75 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 314.98 TOTAL 117,298.61 1.5 PAGE 7 VOUCHRE2 07/02/01 11:43 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 25714 07/02/01 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP PRISONER SUPPLIES/JUNE 2001 FIRE DEPT CLEANING SUPP/MAY 01 FIRE DEPT CLEANING SUPP/JUN 01 CLEANING SUPP/COMM SERVICES TOTAL CHECKS 14 ACCOUNT • NUMBER 001-2101-4306 001-2201-4309 001-4204-4309 110-3302-4309 -ITEM AMOUNT 174.00 2.00 91.11 131.34 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 398.45 398.45 VOUCHRE2 07/02/01 11:43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 110 PARKING FUND 267.11 131.34 TOTAL 398.45 1-7 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 07/03/01 08:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGIS I LH FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 25715 07/03/01 09198 STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS DEPOSIT SUNSET CONCERTS 2001 001-4601-4201 15,000.00 15,000.00 TOTAL CHECKS 15,000.00 I8 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/03/01 08:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 15,000.00 17 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 07/02/01 11:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY 'HAT THE D MANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES TO % INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR &(2 -57/�, ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE ife/6 PAGE 3 July 5, 2001 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council July 10, 2001 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the check(s) listed below: #025685 - 6/28/01 — William Niemann. $26.64. Account number 105-3105. Purchase Order amount was incorrect. Check was not mailed. #025700 — 6/28/01 — So Cal Association of Govts. $255.00. Account number 001-4202-4315. Wrong vendor number used. Check was not mailed. John M. orkm-n, 1i Treasurer Concur: Steph . urrell, City Manager Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland, Finance Director July 5, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ieae-/1425L- Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 1 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION Appointments to fill three expired terms on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Evaluation of bid results for Solid Waste and Recyclables Collection, Processing and Disposal Services contract 01-628 Community Center, Courtyard - Approval to Advertise 00-172 21`` Street Improvements - Approval to Advertise 99-627 Community Center, Fencing - Acceptance City Clerk City Manager Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting ofJuly 3, 2001 Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Public Works Commission meeting ofJuly 11, 2001 Community Resources Director Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting ofJuly 17, 2001 Public Hearing: To certify compliance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and to adopt a CMP Local Implementation Report, pursusant to Government Code Section 65089 Community Development Director Community Development Director Activity Reports for June 2001 All Departments NO MEETING Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council July 10, 2001 PURCHASE OF FOUR (4) 2001 FORD CROWN VICTORIA POLICE SEDANS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Authorize the purchase of four (4) new Ford Crown Victoria black and white police sedans from Wondries Fleet Group of Alhambra, California. BACKGROUND Police Department vehicles are part of the inventory of the Equipment Replacement Fund. For the current 2001/2002 fiscal year, four (4) black and white police vehicles are scheduled for replacement (three Crown Victorias and one Chevrolet Caprice). In February 2001, the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department awarded Wondries Ford in Alhambra the open competitive bid to supply their department with the Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors (black and white police cars). The high volume purchases made by the Los Angeles County sheriffs Department allow for the lowest possible acquisition cost for these vehicles. Wondries Ford in Alhambra bid the lowest price and was awarded the bid for $22,891 for each vehicle. This bid price is also available to the Hermosa Beach Police Department. All vehicles are ordered as part of Los Angeles county Bid #205455 with the equipment as indicated with the option of power seats added at $321.00 extra per vehicle. It is recommended that Council authorize staff to purchase these vehicles from Wondries Fleet Group of Alhambra for $23,212.00 each (includes the power seats). FISCAL IMPACT The funds required for the replacement of this vehicle have been accumulated in the Equipment Replacement Fund for the current 2001/2002 fiscal year. ($100,275.84 includes sales tax) Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL L HERMOSA B HIEF OF POLICE POLICE DEPARTMENT Concur: STl✓PHEN BURRELL CITY MANAGER Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director 2d 62..)-. £)-6i Y July 2, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members For the City Council Meeting of the City Council of July 10, 2001 AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL FOR USE OF VISA CARD • Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, thereby removing Officer Garth Gaines from the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's VISA card. Background: VISA requirements dictate that each change to users be specifically made via a City - Council resolution. Analysis: Effective June 24, 2001, Officer Garth Gaines is no longer assigned to L. A. Impact, the local agency that investigates major narcotic cases so he no longer has need for a City credit card. The credit card has been returned to the Finance Department for cancellation. We are requesting that a new resolution be approved removing Officer Gaines as an authorized user of a City credit card. Respectfully submitted: ih,u„Hatze&ti Valerie Mohler Accounting Supervisor c: \valerie\visaauth.doc Concur: Viki Copeland Finance Director IF/ rd St .hen Burrell City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 00-6137 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA CARD SERVICES FROM SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, was issued a SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION VISA card, for authorized purchases, from the South Bay Credit Union for use by certain officers and employees by Resolution No. 81-4489, as amended by Resolution No. 85-4860, Resolution No. 87-5025, Resolution No. 88-5109, Resolution No. 92-5510, Resolution No. 94-5670, Resolution 97-5887, Resolution 00-6048, Resolution 00-6073 and Resolution 01-6137. WHEREAS, a police officer is no longer assigned to LA Impact and his responsibilities no longer require purchases that could be facilitated by a VISA card. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the authorized signatures in Section 1 of Resolution 01-6137 be amended to read as follows: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES: Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Michael A. Earl Personnel Director c: \valerie\visaauth.doc Michael Lavin Police Chief Russell Tingley Fire Chief PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2001. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY ATTORNEY c: \valerie\visaauth.doc )4,4 o� /// �' C .V-- June 28, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 PROJECT NO. 95-507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SECOND AMENDMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the attached Second Amendment in the amount of $17,404 between the City of Hermosa Beach and David Evans & Associates, Inc. for the extra services performed beyond the original scope of work and to make changes to the plans, specifications and estimates for the restroom building; and 2. Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said amendment to the agreement, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney. Summary: The table below breaks down the contract amount per design phase and illustrates the extra services already performed by the consultant: PHASE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES ORIGINAL FEE ADDITIONAL REQUESTED BY CONSULTANT ADDITIONAL APPROVED BY STAFF Schematic design phase 22,900 655 Not approved Design development phase 14,580 3,884 3,884 Construction document phase 15,120 7,520 4,120 Construction support phase 11,070 No change No change Public meetings 3,540 1,700 1,700 First Amendment 12,500 No change No change Total fees $79,710 $12,059 $9,704 Additionally, City Council has directed Staff to make changes to the restroom building. Staff sent the letter to the consultant indicating the changes to the restroom on June 6, 2001 (see Attachment 2).: The anticipated extra cost to make changes to theplans, specifications, and estimate is $7,700. Please see below for summary of the Second Amendment. 2f • Extra Services Performed To Date: Proposed Extra For Changing Restroom: Total For Second Amendment: 9,704 7,700 $17,404 On January 25, 2000, Council approved the consulting engineering agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and David Evans & Associates (DEA), Inc. for CIP 95-507 Valley Park Improvements for $67,210. On November 14, 2000, Council approved the First Amendment to design the new restroom building for $12,500. Analysis: Due to several changes to the design plans and extra meetings, additional research, design, engineering, and administration budgeted funds were exhausted. These clearly exceed the original scope of services and Staff feels that the additional $17,404 for the design contract is in order. Under the terms of the existing agreement between the City and DEA, Inc., the City has the option of ordering additional services without changing of the agreement. However, this must be done by a written amendment approved by the. City and the Consultant. Fiscal Impact: Original Contract: First Amendment: Proposed Second Amendment: New Contact Amount: $67,210 12,500 17.404 $97,114 The remaining balance before accounting for the Second Amendment in the FY 00-01 budget is $393,934 from the following sources and the final balance of the project is as follows: Amount Remaining In Account Number 125-8507-4201: Amount Remaining In Account Number 126-8507-4201: Proposed Second Amendment: NEW Balance of the Project: $133,981 259,953 $393,934 (17,404) $376,530 The proposed increase in the consultant contract will be taken out evenly from both 125 and 126 accounts. Attachments: No. 1. Second Amendment 2. Copy of Letter Respectfully submitted, Assistant Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Darold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Steph - = urrell City Manager F:\895\PWFILES\CCITEMS195-507 PSA Second Amendment 6-28-01.doc • • SECOND AMENDMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PROJECT NO. CIP 95-507 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the David Evans & Associates, Inc., made and entered into this 10th day of July, 2001 at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, hereinafter called the CITY, and the David Evans & Associates, Inc., hereinafter called the CONSULTANT. WHEREAS, City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with David Evans & Associates, Inc. on January 25, 2000 for the preparation of detailed plans, specifications, cost estimates and other construction documents for the Valley Park Improvements; and WHEREAS, City has determined the Project No. CIP 95-507 will require additional professional services to include design changes to the restroom building. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and terms and conditions, the parties agree as follows: 1. Article I — Scope of Work is amended to read: "CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to City the services set forth in the Scope of Work in attached hereto as Exhibit A and made part of this First Amendment." 2. Article II — Costs is amended to read: "The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the attached Bid Proposal. Total expenditure made after this contract shall not exceed the sum of $99,514 for Project No. CIP 95-507. This fee includes all expenses, consisting of all incidental blueprinting, photography, travel and miscellaneous costs, estimated to be accrued during the life of the contract. It also includes any escalation or inflation factors anticipated. No increase in fees will be allowed during the life of the contract. Any increase in contract amount of scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the CITY and CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurredin the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations." ATTACHMENT 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR: DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach President ATTEST: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Vice President APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney F:\895\PWFILES\CIP\95-507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS\PSA SECOND AMENDMENT 6-28-01 .DOC June 6, 2001 City of 2te4osci 3eacL Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Mr. Jeff Scott, Landscape Architect David Evans & Associates 800 N. Haven Ave. Suite 300 Ontario, CA 91764-4915 Re: Project No. CIP 95-507 Valley Park Improvements — Restroom Building Dear Mr. Scott: The list of comments/changes to the restroom building is as follows: 1. Reduce the roof overhang to 2 feet as indicated (refer to sheet A3, EastNVest View) 2. Install skylights at two locations as indicated (refer to sheet A3, North View) 3. Onecolor/texture for exterior of entire building 4. Switch (flip-flop) the restroom for men and women so that the women's room will be near the playground area 5. Door schedule is incomplete/incorrect (refer to sheet A2) 6. Remove the lexan panels at the south side of the building and install the window system that provides maximum ventilation 7. Make sure the ledge at the north side of the building is flush with the wall (refer to sheet A3) 8. Install the gates, similar to the one that is shown in the enclosed picture, at the entrance for both men and women's rooms Please call me at 310-318-0238 if you have any questions. Thank you for your time and cooperation. Very truly yours, HAROLD C. WILLIAMS, P.E. DIRECTQR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER Kenneth Kim Assistant Engineer Enclosure HCW/KK/me CC: S. Burrell, City Manager FA895\PWFILES\CI!' 5-507 Valley Park Improvements\ letter to dea-restroom 6-4-01.doc ATTACHMENT 2 A9—t/6--acJ • 2/0/ June 28, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 10, 2001 PROJECT STATUS REPORT Recommendation: It is recommended that Council receive and file this report. Summary: This report gives the status of capital improvement projects that are either under design or construction. Capital improvement projects not indicated in this report can be found in the department's Monthly Activity Report. Proiect Status: . PROJECT NO. CIP 00-139 HERMOSA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS. 16'" STREET TO 26°1 STREET DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-20-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 03-13-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A 03-14-01 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 03-27-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 04-30-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARDCOMPLETED COMPLETED 05-22-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 07-09-01 01-16-01 END CONSTRUCTION 09-01 05-21-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-144 STRAND BIKEWAY & PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY RECONSTRUCTION BETWEEN 24'" AND 3e STREET DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 05-25-99 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 10-05-00 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW NIA 03-14-01 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 05-02-00 BID OPENING COMPLETED 10-12-00 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 11-14-00 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 01-16-01 END CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 05-21-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-171 ARDMORE STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 12-21-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 02-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 03-14-01 BID OPENING COMPLETED 03-19-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD COMPLETED 03-27-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 07-09-01 END CONSTRUCTION 10-01 2g PROJECT NO. CIP 00-172 21ST STREET - VALLEY TO POWER STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION • STATUS , STATUS DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 11-20-00 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 12-21-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 06-25-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW COMPLETED 05-02-01, TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 08-01 11-01 BID OPENING 09-01 • TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 09-01 07-11-00 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 10-01 END CONSTRUCTION 12-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-192 LOMA AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS , STATUS DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 11-20-00 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 07-01 08-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 09-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 10-01 11-01 BID OPENING 01-02 • TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 02-02 07-11-00 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03-02 END CONSTRUCTION 08-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-305 INSTALLATION OF CONTINUOS DEFLECTION SCREEN (CDS) STORM WATER CLARIFIER UNITS DESCRIPTION STATUS , STATUS DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 11-20-00 OBTAIN PERMIT FROM THE COUNTY - APPROVAL FOR PROPOSED LOCATION PENDING IN PROGRESS TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 08-01 BID OPENING 09-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 10-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 11-01 END CONSTRUCTION 02-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-306 INSTALLATION OF CATCH BASIN INLET FILTERS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/GRANT APPLICATION COMPLETED 11-24-98 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 06-06-00 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 06-13-00 BID OPENING COMPLETED 06-29-00 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD (DESIGN/BUILD) COMPLETED 07-11-00 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 08-01-01 END CONSTRUCTION 06-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-410 LOMA AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 07-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 08-01 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 09-01 BID OPENING 10-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 11-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 12-01 END CONSTRUCTION 07-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 95-507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 06-24-99 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 03-05-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 03-27-01 BACK TO STAFF BID OPENING TBA TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TBA BEGIN CONSTRUCTION TBA END CONSTRUCTION TBA PROJECT NO. CIP 99-530 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS - SOUTH PARK ROLLER HOCKEY DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 04-05-01 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 05-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 10-23-00 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A BID OPENING TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE COMPLETED 11-28-00 BID OPENING COMPLETED 12-07-00 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO RE -BID COMPLETED 02-27-01 BID OPENING 08-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 08-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 09-01 END CONSTRUCTION 11-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-530 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS 3RD STREET PARK DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 04-05-01 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 05-01-01 TO PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 06-01 TO PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 07-01 BID OPENING 08-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 09-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 09-01 END CONSTRUCTION 11-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 95-622 CITY HALL REMODEL - ADA UPGRADES DESCRIPTION STATUS • PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) IN PROGRESS TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A CM AGREEMENT TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL COMPLETED 11-28-00 CONSTRUCTIBILITY REVIEW IN PROGRESS - RELOCATION PROGRAMMING IN PROGRESS TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS & SPECS, ADVERTISE COMPLETED 05-22-01 BID OPENING 07-12-01 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 07-24-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 09-01 END CONSTRUCTION 06-02 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-627 COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS — COURTYARD AND PAINTING DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ' COMPLETED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 04-09-01 • DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 06-14-01 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW NIA BID OPENING 12-07-00 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 07-01 01-09-01 • BID OPENING " 08-01 END CONSTRUCTION TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 08-01 ' BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 09-01 END CONSTRUCTION 12-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-627 COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS - FENCING DESCRIPTION STATUS STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ' COMPLETED 05-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) COMPLETED 10-23-00 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW N/A TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE 11-14-00 05-02 BID OPENING 12-07-00 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 01-09-01 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 03-12-01 END CONSTRUCTION 06-01 PROJECT NO. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE 1I1 DESCRIPTION STATUS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETED 03-08-00 DESIGN & ENGINEERING (PS&E) 12-01 TO PW COMMISSION FOR REVIEW 01-02 TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. TO ADVERTISE 01-02 BID OPENING 04-02 TO COUNCIL FOR AWARD 04-02 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION - 05-02 END CONSTRUCTION 06-03 • Indicates Construction Completed *TBA — TO BE ADVISED Respectfully submitted, arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Steph City Ma -ger F:1B951PWFILESICCITEMSIprogress reports 6-12-01.doc Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council -7// DAD) June 13, 2001 Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-144 STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET - ACCEPTANCE - Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Accept the work by Los Angeles Engineering Inc. for Project No. CIP 99-144 Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Walkway Between 24th Street and 35th Street; 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion; and 3. Authorize Staff to release payment to Los Angeles Engineering Inc. (5% retained for 35 days following filing of Notice of Completion). Background: On November 14, 2000, City Council approved the award of the construction contract for CIP No. 99-144 Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Walkway Between 24th Street to 35th Street to Los Angeles Engineering Incorporated. The proposed work included removal of the pavement, masonry wall, receptacles, lights, stairs and bench at 30th Street, and installation of the concrete slab, wall, lighting system, receptacles, railing, stairs and bench at 35th Street, and striping. There was concern about the cracks in the newly poured Strand wall since more cracks occurred on the northern portion of the project as opposed to the southern portion. This can be explained by the fact that for the northern portion of project, the wall was poured directly on the existing seawall. The seawall has many wood type expansion joints with no rebar. With the seawall constantly moving, there was no way to control the cracking in the wall. For the majority of the southern portion, the wall was poured on either the new Strand slab or a new footing. This was done because either the existing seawall was damaged, terminated below the excavation level, or did not exist. Where possible, the seawall was repaired and doweled into the new Strand slab or a new footing with rebar was constructed. This allowed the newwall to move with the new footing or. the new 'Strand slab,.: which explains the occurrence of fewer cracks. The contractor has completed the work to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 1 2h Analysis: 1. The project was constructed according to the plans, specifications and change orders prepared by Staff. Therefore, Staff recommends acceptance of the work as complete. 2. The project was completed on schedule. Start date: Contract time: Date of completion: January 16, 2001 83 working days May 21, 2001 The City took beneficial occupancy on May 21, 2001. The remaining punch list items have all been completed. Fiscal Impact: Design/Engineering $ 42,286 Construction Administration 38,082 Construction Management 47,093 Soils Testing Services 2,378 Construction Cost 667,913 Total Project Cost $ 797,752 Funding: 115 Fund, TDA Local & Regional $ 86,397 121 Fund, Prop A Open Space 299,000 146 Fund, Prop. C Local Returns 208,876 150 Fund, Rideshare Grant 106,000 160 Fund, Sewer Fund 107,737 Total Funding $ .808,010 Unexpended Project Balance $ 10,258 2 Respectfully submitted, Tristan D. Malabanan Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copland Finance Director Concur: , arold C. Williams, P.E. - Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: .'iliititt Step B tell City anager F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\99-144 acceptance-Strand.doc Wf • S Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 2001 Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182 MYRTLE AVENUE UNDERGROUNDING AND PROJECT NO. CIP 97-183 LOMA DRIVE UNDERGROUNDING - STATUS REPORT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Summary: This report covers the progress made to date in the two utility undergrounding districts. Edison has converted the property owners' overhead power lines to underground for the entire Myrtle District. Verizon has removed each of the poles situated within the district along Hermosa Avenue. Staff has coordinated the current Edison and Verizon work schedules so that all poles will be removed within the district by the end of July. For two weeks in June, Edison's crew was not working due to unanticipated scheduling problems. The crew is currently removing all the remaining components from the poles in the district with the exception of the poles on Myrtle and Silverstrand Avenues. Those poles have already been stripped of the components. Edison will begin installing primary,wires in the Loma District on July 16. They have, however, installed three new streetlights within the district (the corner of 6th Street and Loma Drive, the corner of Sunset Drive and Pier Avenue, and the corner of 11th Street and Loma Drive). Based on the latest Edison work schedule, the property owners' crossover will- be completed by the end of September 2001. Verizon will also begin their work in the Loma District on July 16. Their materials will be in the City Yard by July 9 and their work order for the Loma District has been finalized. The pole removal process in both districts will begin after all overhead electric, telephone, and cable TV lines have been completely removed.. Work Completed: The substructure installation of ducts for electricity, telephone and cable has been completed per the original design plans. The placement of vaults, pull boxes, hand -holes and laterals to residents, as indicated in the initially drawn plans, has also been completed. Pavement repairs, striping, and final clean up of the reconstructed areas within the districts have been completed as well. The City has accepted the work done by Irish Construction Company for both projects. The property owners' conversion punch list for the Loma District has been finalized. Staff sent non-compliance notices on June 12 to 18 property owners in the Loma District via certified mail with return receipts requested in order to inform 14 of them of their conversion deficiencies and to give 4 property owners one last opportunity to complete their conversions. The final deadline for all 18 property owners was set for June 29. The property owners' power services have been 100% switched underground in the Myrtle District. Poles along Hermosa Avenue have been removed and the sidewalk areas around them have been rebuilt. Three streetlights have been installed in each district. 2i Work in Progress: As the work in the Myrtle District draws to a close, Staff is now concentrating on the Loma District to bring it to 100% compliant before either Edison or Verizon begin their work. Of the 18 property owners to whom Staff mailed the "noncompliance notices", 8 have contacted the City to resolve their outstanding problems. One has already fixed the problem and two have stated that their buildings will be demolished soon. Staff, however is finalizing the assessment on all the properties marked as non-compliant by Edison and City inspectors. These properties will then be done by the least expensive bidder selected based on the previously approved City Council resolution. Verizon is working toward completion of their work in the Myrtle District and they are officially the party responsible for pole removal by the end of July. Edison will then install the remaining permanent lights within the district. Work Remaining: Of the four property owners in Loma District who have not done any work at their properties, two have stated from the beginning that their buildings at 701 Loma Drive and at 1214-1216 Monterey Boulevard (1217 Sunset) will be rebuilt. The property owner at 745 Loma Drive has never responded to any of the City's correspondence and the one at 814 Monterey has just authorized the City to let a previously selected electrician complete the work on her property using CDBG financial assistance funds. Among the property owners with conversion deficiencies, one at 1322 Sunset has already fixed the problem with and Staff is considering the remaining 13 as "noncompliant". Edison will begin their primary wiring work in the Loma District on July 16. Verizon is expected to begin work in the Loma District at the same time as Edison. Cable has already been undergrounded in the Myrtle District; Adelphia has to yet finalize their work schedule in the. Loma District. Conclusions: Staff has utilized all available resources to complete both projects concurrently. While substructure work for both districts was finished in less than a year, the slow process associated with property owners' conversions and the required 90% completion rates for both Edison and Verizon slowed progress afterwards. Furthermore, because the noted utility companies were each able to assign only a single crew the districts, the Myrtle District was completed before the Loma District, even though both districts had 90% completion rates at about the same time. But, since the Loma District is limited to two long straight streets of Loma and Sunset and only the small areas of the four cross streets - 6th, 8th, 10th, and 11th Streets, it is expected that the Loma District will be completed at a much faster pace than the Myrtle District. Respectfully submitted, /Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer 6J4,,e Concur: fits Ste' Wil! urrell Cit"'onager 2 F:\695\PWFILES\CCITEMS\97-183, 97-183 status report 7-10-01.doc 9/11/D/ June 27, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 10, 2001 APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 01.001 FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES ON AN AS -NEEDED BASIS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the attached Professional Services Agreement No. 01.001 between the City of Hermosa Beach and DMR Team, Inc. for $100,000; and 2. Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said agreement upon approval as to form by the City Attorney. Background: The 2001-02 Capital Improvement Project Budget has included several projects that require engineering and design services. Below is a partial list of projects: STREET IMPROVEMENTS CIP 01-159 Street Improvements - Hillcrest & Rhodes between 21st St. and 18th St.; 18th St. from PCH to Prospect Ave; 19th St. between PCH to Rhodes St. CIP 01-164 Street Improvements — Various Streets #2 —1St Street between PCH & Barney Court CIP.: 01-166 Street Improvements - Slurry Sealing at various locations east of PCH CIP 01-167 Street Improvements — Concrete Pavement Repair at Various Locations The services of a civil engineering and design team are needed to supplement the civil engineering and design capacity of the Public Works Department. In the interest of saving time and money, Staff is recommending that these services be acquired on an as -needed basis. Under the terms of this arrangement, the scope and cost of specific assignments of work would be established by individual task order issued at the appropriate time against the not -to -exceed master contract amount. Please see ATTACHMENT 1 for a sample Task Order. Analysis: • DMR Team, Inc. has been providing engineering and design services to the City for the past two years. Over this period, DMR Team's services have been excellent. The construction bid prices based on their work products (construction documents) have been at or below the engineer's estimate. Equally important, the final construction costs have been at or below the bid prices. In addition, Staff has developed a' mutually beneficial working relationship with DMR;Team; Inc. .And, their design fees are fair and reasonable. For the reasons indicated above, Staff is recommending that DMR Team, Inc. be retained to prepare the plans, specifications and estimates and other construction documents on an as -needed basis for a fee not -to -exceed $100,000. 2 s •. Fiscal Impact: The Task Orders will be charged against the contract amount of $100,000 and to the specific CIP account. Attachments: 1. Sample Task Order 2. Professional Services Agreement No. 01.001 Respectfully submitted, &) arold C. Williams, P.E. Steplj ' u e irector of Public Works/City Engineer City Manager Concur: Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\eng & design services as needed 6-26=01.doc 2 4 City of 21ermosa Teach TASK ORDER NOTICE To PROCEED Project Task Order No. Date: , 2001 Project No. CIP Consultant's Job No. You ARE HEREBY REQUESTED TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SERVICES: DETAILS OF WORK: PURSUANT TO ARTICLE I - SCOPE OF WORK, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CONSULTANT TIME OF PERFORMANCE: WORK IS AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE ON THE DATE OF THIS PROJECT TASK ORDER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED AS DIRECTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OR HIS DESIGNEE. '' ATTACHMENT 1 NOTICE TO PROCEED CONTRACT TASK ORDER NO. PAGE 2 COMPENSATION: PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 2, THE -RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE. THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION SHALL NOT EXCEED WITHOUT WRITTEN AMENDMENT HERETO. UNDER PROVISIONS OF: CONTRACT NO. DATED THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA BY: STEPHEN R. BURRELL, CITY MANAGER RECEIVED: DATE: CONSULTANT: ADDRESS: BY: F:\B951PWFILES\Tristan\Task Orders\task order blank.doc PSA No. 01.001 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of July, 2001 at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, hereinafter called the CITY, and DMR Team, Inc., hereinafter called the CONSULTANT. WITNESSETH: That the CONSULTANT for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the CITY herein expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the CITY professional services and materials, as follows: ARTICLE I - Scope of Work CONSULTANT shall perform all work on an as -needed basis by Project Task Orders issued by the City. A sample Task Order is attached as Exhibit A. ARTICLE II - Costs The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any. part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the attached Fee Schedule. The Task Orders shall be charged against the contract amount of the specific CIP project. Total expenditure made under this contract shall not exceed the sum of $100,000. This fee includes all expenses, consisting of all incidental blueprinting, photography, travel, and miscellaneous costs, estimated to be accrued during the life of the contract.' It also includes any escalation or inflation factors anticipated. No increase in fees will be allowed during the life of the contract. Any increase in contract amount or scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the CITY and CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations. ARTICLE III - Method of Payment CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed monthly in arrears based upon the hourly services provided. CONSULTANT shall submit invoices in triplicate and addressed to the CITY, c/o the Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3884. ARTICLE IV - Subcontracting CONSULTANT shall not be permitted to subcontract any portion of this contract without the express written consent of the CITY. ATTACHMENT 2 • • ARTICLE V - Completion Date CONSULTANT shall commence work under this agreement upon execution of this agreement and shall use reasonable professional effort to complete the work according to the schedule submitted as part of Exhibit "A", however, the CITY's Director of Public Works may extend the completion date as required by the scope of this contract. Any contract time extension shall require the express written consent of the Director of Public Works. CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for delays in services that occur without the fault of CONSULTANT. ARTICLE VI - Accounting Records CONSULTANT must maintain accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred which records and documents shall be kept available at the CONSULTANT's California office during the contract period and thereafter for three years from the date of final payment of Federal funds hereunder. ARTICLE VII - Ownership of Data All data, maps, photographs, and other material collected or prepared under the contract shall become the property of the CITY provided that the CITY shall indemnify and hold CONSULTANT harmless from any claim or injury resulting in any way from any reuse of the above mentioned work product without the written consent of CONSULTANT. ARTICLE VIII - Termination This contract may be terminated at any time for breach and the CITY may terminate unilaterally and without cause upon seven (7) days written notice to the CONSULTANT. All work satisfactorily performed pursuant to the contract and prior to the date of termination may be claimed for reimbursement. ARTICLE IX - Assignability CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer interest in thiscontract without the prior written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE X - Amendment It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of the terms of this contract, or any subcontract requiring the approval of the CITY, shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and approved by all necessary parties. ARTICLE XI - Non -Solicitation Clause The CONSULTANT warrants that he or she has not employed or retained any company or persons, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the CITY shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion to deduct from 2 • the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. ARTICLE XII - Equal Opportunity Assurance During the performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT agrees as follows: A. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, creed, color or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, creed, color or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. B. The CONSULTANT will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, sex, creed, color or national origin. • C. The CONSULTANT will permit access to their books, records and accounts by the applicant agency, the State, the Federal Highway Administration and/or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for purposes of investigation to. ascertain compliance with this nondiscrimination clause. D. In the event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part. ARTICLE XIII - Clean Air Act During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) as amended. ARTICLE XIV - Indemnity CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify the CITY, its officers, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that. may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization to the extent they arise out of the negligent acts or intentional tortious acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein. CONSULTANT will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection herewith. CONSULTANT will promptly pay any judgment rendered against CITY, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities. 3 In the event CITY, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against CONSULTANT for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the sole negligence of CONSULTANT hereunder, CONSULTANT agrees to pay CITY, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by CITY, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees. ARTICLE XV - Insurance A. Without limiting CONSULTANT'S obligations arising under ARTICLE XIV - Indemnity, CONSULTANT shall not begin work under this Agreement until it obtains policies of insurance required under this section. The insurance shall cover CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives and employees in connection with the performance of work under this Agreement, and shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Insurance coverage shall be as follows: i. Automobile Liability Insurance with minimum coverages of $500,000 for property damage, $500,000 for injury to one person/single occurrence, and $500,000 for injury to more than one person/single occurrence. ii. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance, insuring CITY its elected and appointed officers, agents, and employees from claims for damages for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from CONSULTANT'S actions under this Agreement, whether or not done by CONSULTANT or anyone directly or indirectly employed by CONSULTANT. Such insurance shall have a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000. iii. Worker's Compensation Insurance for all CONSULTANT'S employees to the extent required by the State of California. B. Deductibility Limits for policies referred to in subparagraphs A (i) (ii) and (iii) shall not exceed $5,000 per occurrence. C. Additional Insured. City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, and employees shall be named as additional insureds on policies referred to in subparagraphs A (i) and (ii). D. Primary Insurance. The insurance required in paragraphs A (i) (ii) and (iv) shall be primary and not excess coverage. E. Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall furnish CITY, prior to the execution of this Agreement, satisfactory evidence of the insurance required, issued by an insurer authorized to do business in California, and an endorsement to each such policy of insurance evidencing that each carrier is required to give CITY at least 30 days prior written notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of the Agreement. All required insurance policies are subject to approval of the City Attorney. Failure on the part of CONSULTANT to procure or maintain said insurance in full force and effect shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement or procure or renew such insurance, and pay any premiums therefor at CONSULTANT'S expense. • • ARTICLE XVI - Enforcement of Agreement In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court. ARTICLE XVII -Conflicts of Interest No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. ARTICLE XVIII - Independent CONSULTANT The CONSULTANT is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent consultant. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of the CONSULTANT or any of the CONSULTANT's employees, except as herein set forth. The CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the CITY. ARTICLE XIX - Entire Agreement of the Parties This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are noii embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. ARTICLE XX - Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statutes and regulations as amended. • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT MAYOR: Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach DMR Team, Inc. ATTEST: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 6 45—P71- -7:g ) 0°AI June 28, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 10, 2001 • ACCEPTANCE OF,QUITCLAIM DEED Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the attached resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ACCEPTING REAL PROPERTY QUITCLAIM TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY CHARLES C. KNAGENHELM AND EUNICE KNAGENHELM". Background: This quitclaim is in connection with the street vacation of the southeasterly twenty-two feet of 25th Street adjacent to Lot 7, Block 25 of the Hermosa Beach tract bounded by the Strand to the west and Hermosa Avenue to the east approved by City Council on April 24; 2001, Resolution No. 01-6128. Attachments: 1. Quitclaim Deed 2. Proposed Resolution Respectfully submitted, Concur: AchG4- Homa o Behboodi Y Associate Engineer C> arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Steph( R. City Manager F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\knagenhelm quitclaim 7-10-01.doc 2k AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED • NAME STREET ADDRESS c1TY. STATE ZIP Earl op 1/02MoS» i3s4-cH-1 1315, V/1 -u« y D2. Lit- B(4 -C/! c/l- 9o2sJ TITLE ORDER NO. ESCROW NO. A PN • 4182 0021106 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE QUITCLAIM DEED - THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is $ County $ O computed on full value of property conveyed, or O computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale O unincorporated area: D.City of , and City FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. CHARLES C. KNAGENHELM AND EUNICE KNAGENHELM, ALSO KNOWN AS EUNICE M. 'KNAGENHELM hereby remise, release and forever quitclaim to THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION the following described real property in the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , State of California: County of . LOS ANGELES • BEING A PORTION OF 25TH STREET AS SHOWN ON HERMOSA BEACH TRACT,1'AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 25 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY -RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTHWESTERLY EIGHT (8) FEET OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY ONE-HALF (1/2) OF SAID 25TH STREET, ADJACENT TO LOT 7, BLOCK 25 OF SAID HERMOSA BEACH TRACT BOUNDED BY THE STRAND TO THE WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE TO THE EAST. Dated JUNE 20, 2001 =4_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES. KNA COUNTYOF LOS ANGELES 'ss On JUNE 20, 2001 before me. vilma hasti nosa Notary Public personally appeared ' CHARLES C. KNAGENHELM AND EUNICE KNAGENHELM personalty known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the "nstrument the person(s) or the entity upon be - of which the •erson(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my han Signature Mail Tax Statements to: and o ici • EUNI LE KNAGENHELM. VILMA HASTINGS o .w v ,- Comm. No. 1245883 0 2 NOTARY PUBLIC -CAUFORNIA p U '. LOS ANGELES COUNTY :.. �•:_ My Comm. Exp. Dec: 17, 2003' '•E -vv".l vv* V",17/IV r v... (This area for official notarial seal) NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY. STATE & ZIP TC 051 4/94 ATTACHMENT 1 1 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 01• A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEAC ACCEPTING REAL PROPERTY QUITCLAIM TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEAC BY CHARLES C. KNAGENHELM AND EUNICE KNAGENHELM The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: .I SECTION 1. The City Council accepts the real property quitclaim to the City of Hermosa Beach by Charles C. Knagenhelm and Eunice Knagenhelm, also known as Eunice M. Knagenhelm, as described in the Quitclaim Deed attached hereto as Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is authorized to execute any and all documents necessary, including a certificate of acceptance, in order to consummate the above —described transaction. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10" DAY OF JULY, 2001. PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY F:1695\PWFILESIRESOS125th St. quitclaim deed 7-10-01.d ATTACHMENT 2 RECORDING REQUESTED BY • AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED TO: NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY. STATE ZIP Earl or H0-2i1oSR 131sVP-tail ,p2. L�R/�Jvs Brf-cif 9o2s� TITLE ORDER NO. ESCROW NO. A.P.N.• 4182 002 006 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE QUITCLAIM DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is $ County $ City o computed on full value of property conveyed, or • . O computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale O unincorporated area: ❑.City of , and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. " CHARLES C. KNAGENHELM AND EUNICE KNAGENHELM, ALSO KNOWN AS EUNICE M. KNAGENHELM htreby remise, release and forever quitclaim to THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION the following described real property in the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH County of LOS ANGELES , State of California: • BEING A PORTION OF 25TH STREET AS. SHOWN ON HERMOSA BEACH TRACT,CAS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 25 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY -RECORDER OF. SAID COUNTY, MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTHWESTERLY EIGHT (8) FEET OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY ONE-HALF (1/2) OF SAID 25TH STREET, ADJACENT TO LOT 7, BLOCK 25 OF SAID HERMOSA BEACH TRACT BOUNDED BY THE STRAND TO THE WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE TO THE EAST.• • Dated JUNE 20. 2001 --7-;46%.4__., g:77' }Ss . STATE OF CALIFORNIA CHARLESKNACOUNTYOF LOS ANGELES On JUNE 20. 2001 before me, vilma hasti ngsa Notary Public �`��_- personally appeared CHARLES C. KNAGENHELM EUNKNAGENHEL AND EUNICE. KNAGENHELM • personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the 'nstrument the person(s) or the entity upon be - of which the •erson(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my han and o ici Signature Mail Tax Statements to: NAME TC 051 4194 Le, STREET ADDRESS VILMA HASTINGS o . _,-,� Comm. No. 1245883 o 2 °�,; NOTARY PUBLIC - CAUFORNIA p U LOS ANGELES COUNTY u My Comm. Exp. Dec. 17, 2003 EXHIBIT A (This area for official notarial seal) CITY, STATE & ZIP Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 2, 2001 7/101 Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR APPRAISAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH TYCOM TRANSPACIFIC CABLE PROJECT Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Direct staff to retain Lea Associates to provide an appraisal to determine the value for leasing City owned property for the beach landing of the TyCom project. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the attached appraisal agreement with fee of $9,500 and to obtain additional services if required, to evaluate the economic benefit of the proposed project cable station. Additional work on a time and material basis in an amount not to exceed $6,500. Background: The City Council previously authorized TyCom to submit an application to process a Precise Development Plan and conduct related environmental study of the proposed submarine cable landing project. On May 8, 2001 the City Council awarded contract to E & E to conduct all environmental review of the project and to prepare an environmental impact report. The project requires leasing two beach landing sites within the City which must be appraised. The project developer will reimburse the City for the cost of the appraisals. Analysis: Staff has requested a proposal from Lea Associates, a qualified property appraiser and real estate financial consultant to value the lease of City owned property for the beach landing sites. Lea Associates previously prepared the appraisal for the ground lease of city owned property to develop the 1303 Hermosa Avenue retail building adjacent the parking structure. The work includes: • Market value appraisal of the beach landing sites at 2nd Street and Longfellow Avenue. • Preparation of summary report summarizing the details of the valuation and appraisals. • Supporting comparative documentation and presentation of findings to City Council. The fee for the appraisal is $9,500. An additional appraisal of the economic benefit of locating the cable switching station in the City may also be warranted and is proposed in an amount not to exceed $6,500. The proposal also provides for additional services subject to Council review and approval. The appraisal will be used in negotiating the lease terms for the project. Approval of the lease will be scheduled concurrently with the final project hearings. The project final EIR and Precise Development Plan hearings are scheduled for Planning Commission and City Council at the end of the year or early in 2002. m Sol :lumen'eld, Director Community Concur: evelopment Department Ste urrell, City Manager 1 Attaclunents: 1. Appraisal Proposals 2. Project Map H:/Lea2 21 Lea Associates Property Economics Mr. Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department 1315 Valley Boulevard Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: :\ nu: I. I'car.r ( \1:\I, �R:\ SENT VIA FACSIMILE (310) 937-6238 May 23, 2001 I�. i• r1 \I. L.•.i, NIA! Icttrcr T. \a_:u:1ki, NIA I ( rr11,1 L. (A n um,. \1:\I 1;ri:on MAY 2 q 7firl� COM. DEV. DEPT Re: Proposal to Provide Appraisal Services: Tycom Alternate Sites Hermosa Beach, CA Job No. 3485 I•,hn I. (4,1+,41. Ir. Luca \L1rc .t illi In accordance with your request, this writing represents our proposal to provide real property analysis services concerning the above -referenced property. It is our understanding that the subject property consists of license agreements for access across tidelands, beachfront and streets owned by the city of Hermosa Beach at two potential locations. This includes the 2nd Street landing and Longfellow landing sites. Further, we understand that appraisal services are required to provide an estimate of market value of the license agreement to install a transcontinental fiber optic cable beneath public beaches and rights of way through the city of Hermosa Beach. We hereby propose to provide Summary Appraisal reports, in three (3) copies. The report format will comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards 2-2(b) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The Summary Appraisal Report will summarize the details relevant to the valuation and appraisal process. Supporting documentation for this format is contained within our files. Our fee for the assignment as described above is proposed not to exceed $9,500 and delivery of our reports is proposed at within six to eight weeks of receipt of notice to proceed. Our fees will be billed on a time expended basis at the end of each calendar month until project completion. Costs incurred for necessary delivery services of reports will be passed through in addition to the fees cited above. During the course of our work for you, or subsequent to the delivery of our reports, you may desire additional services for negotiation efforts, valuation updates, hearing or trial preparation or appearance, or other needs. If so, such services will be provided and will be billed additionally, at the rate of $275 per hour for services provided by Jeffrey T. Nagasaki, MAI. Such services completed by other professional staff members will be billed in accordance with our standard billing rates in effect at that time. A minimum of one-half day will be billed for any required appearance at trial, deposition, or other judicial proceeding. 2 I.ca Associates, Inc. . Property I clnxanic. 1(03 Pontius Ave„,lc Los Angeles. California 90015 Irlcpllunc ( 1111 -177-0505 I .1x (:I(1) u).) -II',) 1 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld May 23, 2001 Page Two It is possible that delays may occur, which will cause you to request a delay in the completion and delivery of appraisal reports. Such delays may impact not only delivery timing but the total fee for job completion. An invoice will be prepared covering time expended through receipt of the notice of delay. The progress payment will be due upon receipt of said invoice. Receipt of payment is a requirement for recommencement of work. Costs incurred for necessary overnight travel, messenger delivery services, and exhibits requested by counsel will be passed through in addition to the fees cited above. It should be understood that these quoted rates are valid for a time period not to exceed 60 days from this writing and subsequent to that date are subject to revision in accordance with our standard fee schedule for such work in effect at that time. The delivery schedule set forth is effective as of the date of this letter. However, if there are significant changes in our work schedule prior to our receipt of notice to proceed with this assignment, the delivery schedule may require modification. If this is the case, we will notify you immediately upon receipt of this executed agreement and required retainer. Work to be undertaken under this agreement will be prepared in conformity with and subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute, as well as the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) of the Appraisal Foundation. It is understood that the fees quoted herein are for the provision of professional services and are not, in any way, contingent upon either the valuation reported or upon the outcome of any pending matter for which valuation is required. In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between us arising out of or related to this agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, including all investigation, collection, attorneys', and arbitrators' fees and expenses. Items to be provided by the client and upon which the above fee and timing are contingent include: Two EIR proposals and application documentation contained within your files. Mr. Sol Blumenfeld May 23, 2001 Page Three Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal. If any questions remain concerning this proposal or the subject matter thereof, please call and we will respond promptly. We look forward to undertaking this interesting assignment on your behalf. Agreed and approved: (Signature) (Printed name) JN:ah Respectfully submitted, LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. (Date) • Lea Associates Property Economics Mr. Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department 1315 Valley Boulevard Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: :\tt'liat,•J l-,nnnit nu: I. I'car . (:,1.luu:ul. SENT VIA FACSIMILE 0310) 937-6235 May 23, 2001 1.•.1 -cit Ni. 1..t. `.I.N1 Irurrx T. N:1_.1<al<i. `L.\! 1. icr.il,l I. l :I,n:nan. \I.\1 ,:, P. 11, u,. 1.1111.• .\. sIttrn 10I111 I. c;,1111.•11. Ir. Lura \Ltr.,,tulli Re: Proposal to Provide Economic Consulting Services: Economic Benefits Analysis Tycom Switching Station Hermosa Beach, California In accordance with your request, this writing represents our proposal to provide economic consulting services concerning the above -referenced project. Our analysis will study potential economic benefits and growth potential by the location of a Tycom Switching Station within the city of Hermosa Beach. Our study efforts will focus on the economic opportunities created as a result of growing businesses which develop as a result of the location of similar facilities. We will study analogous experience in varying facilities to determine economic impacts which include, but are not limited to the following: Growth of new businesses as a direct result of the location of the switching station; New demand for office or other space as a result of this location; Expanding community opportunities as a result of location; Potential revenue streams associated with this growth and potential fees available to the city. We will prepare a study which provides conservative, probable and optimistic results which may be fostered by this location. This will provide a meaningful tool for the city to determine long term benefits direct as a result of this location. Our study focuses on alternative locations in which similar experiences can be correlated into a meaningful fiscal analysis. I ea :\-. -ialc.. Inc. Property Iaonuntic. I( +5 Pontius,\ventre I .\ngcic:. (.,tlilurnia'111(1'_5 telephone OIt)) 4 -(>•t 1"..o.1.110),11 -1-02.n) Mr. Sol Blumenfeld May 23, 2001 Page Two We hereby propose to provide Consulting Reports, in three (3) copies. The report format will comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards 5-2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The Consulting Report will summarize the details relevant to the process. Supporting documentation for this format is contained within our files. We hereby propose to provide consulting services in three stages. Stage 1 services will involve preliminary market investigations related to alternate locations of similar characteristics of the proposed subject location. We will obtain preliminary information on multiple projects in order to determine if there is any potential to measure possible economic benefits as described earlier in this letter. Stage 2 services will involve a more detailed analysis quantifying these benefits (if they exist) and providing a conservative, probable and optimistic projections for these benefits. At the completion of Stage 2 services, a brief outline will be presented and our findings will be preliminarily presented to you for further consideration and determination whether to proceed to formal written reports. Stage 3 services represent preparation of a formal document which explains and discusses all issues related to this matter and will be prepared in a summary format. Our fees will be billed on a time expended basis and are currently estimated not to exceed $6,500 for Stage 1 services. At the completion of Stage 1 services Stage 2 services are budgeted at an estimate not to exceed $5,000 for completion of these services. Finally, if authorized, Stage 3 services will encompass the formal written report and the estimated fee is projected not to exceed $5,000. Delivery of Stage 1 services is proposed at within six to seven weeks of receipt of notice to proceed. Upon authorization, Stage 2 services are estimated to proceed and be completed within two weeks of authorization and completion of the formal document is estimated to coincide with a period of two weeks. Costs incurred for necessary delivery services of reports will be passed through in addition to the fees cited above. During the course of our work for you, or subsequent to the delivery of our reports, you may desire additional services for negotiation efforts, valuation updates, hearing or trial preparation or appearance, or other needs. If so, such services will be provided and will be billed additionally, at the rate of $275 per hour for services provided by Jeffrey T. Nagasaki, MAI. Such services completed by other professional staff members will be billed in accordance with our standard billing rates in effect at that time. A minimum of one-half day will be billed for any required appearance at trial, deposition, or other judicial proceeding. It is possible that delays may occur, which will cause you to request a delay in the completion and delivery of appraisal reports. Such delays may impact not only delivery timing but the total fee for job completion. An invoice will be prepared covering time expended through receipt of the notice of delay. The progress payment will be due upon receipt of said invoice. Receipt of payment is a requirement for recommencement of work. Costs incurred for necessary overnight travel, messenger delivery services, and exhibits requested by counsel will be passed through in addition to the fees cited above. Mr. Sol Blumenfeld May 23, 2001 Page Three It should be understood that these quoted rates are valid for a time period not to exceed 60 days from this writing and subsequent to that date are subject to revision in accordance with our standard fee schedule for such work in effect at that time. The delivery schedule set forth is effective as of the date of this letter. However, if there are significant changes in our work schedule prior to our receipt of notice to proceed with this assignment, the delivery schedule may require modification. If this is the case, we will notify you immediately upon receipt of this executed agreement and required retainer. Work to be undertaken under this agreement will be prepared in conformity with and subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute, as well as the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) of the Appraisal Foundation. It is understood that the fees quoted herein are for the provision of professional services and are not, in any way, contingent upon either the valuation reported or upon the outcome of any pending matter for which valuation is required. In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between us arising out of or related to this agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, including all investigation, collection, attorneys', and arbitrators' fees and expenses. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal. If any questions remain concerning this proposal or the subject matter thereof, please call and we will respond promptly. We look forward to undertaking this interesting assignment on your behalf. Agreed and approved: (Signature) (Printed name) JN:ah Respectfully submitted, LEA ASSOCIATES, INC. 0I, f Jeff y . Nagasaki, MAI (Date) Two separate landing sites Cable station Beach o. to Oregon — to Hawaii 7:mit burial meters Buried cables Marine Segment Offshore cable (two separate alignments) End of conduits (30 meters (15 meters water depth) water depth) Shore -End Segment Buried conduits Four 4 -inch conduits (two separate alignments) Two diverse, buried, terrestrial • cable routes Terrestrial Segment Two separate landing sites with two diverse terrestrial routes which will connect to cable station in the City of Redondo Beach 02001 Ecology and Environment. Inc. Figure 1-1 Overview of Project Segments 00125I.TY02.02.a (Z.54) 03/13/2001 7// o/Di July 3, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 10, 2001 PROPOSAL for the "PROGRAMMING and CONCEPTUAL DESIGN / BUDGETING" PHASES of the FIRE STATION REMODEL - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #99-610 by the RRM DESIGN GROUP, an ARCHITECTURAL and ENGINEERING FIRM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Hermosa Beach Fire Department that City Council approve the proposal for the "Programming and Conceptual Design / Budgeting" phases of the Fire Station remodel - Capital Improvement Project #99-610 by the RRM Design Group, an architectural and engineering firm. BACKGROUND. The original fire station was built in 1954 and, in 1989, a second story was added to provide needed sleeping and bathroom spaces for firefighters working 24-hour shifts. Increased demands on the department along with the advent of female firefighters and other industry mandates require attention to the renovation and remodel of existing facilities. Project goals include the addition of square footage to the second floor for additional sleeping areas, bathroom(s), improved office spaces, storage, and to provide a more efficient work environment, meeting the changing operational demands of the department while bringing it into conformance with ADA requirements and OSHA regulations. PROJECT WORK PLAN and STRATEGY A Project Management Plan will be used and developed from research and discussions with the Fire Department Design Committee. This report .will focus on project goals and procedures including: budget, time, aesthetics, and functionality. 1 1 • The architectural team will produce one (1) conceptual building layout and design including a site plan and exterior sketch perspective showing the massing of the existing building with its addition / renovation. Based.on the project programs and site analysis a conceptual study will be used to identify the operational priorities of the department as they affect the cost of the project. The goal of this study is to determine the basic operational demands of the department, apply them spatially to the existing facility and to determine levels of costs for improvements. A Comprehensive Project Budget will be developed with three (3) alternative budgets presented addressing both current and future needs of the department developed through short and long range planning efforts. FISCAL IMPACT The proposal fee of $27,505.00 includes the architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services to accommodate the Programming and Conceptual Design and Project Budgeting phases for the Fire Station Capital Improvement Project. Respectfully submitted: RUSSELL TINGLEY, FIRE CHIEF Concur: STEPHEN BURR LL, C TY MANAGER Noted for fiscal impact: IKI CO ELAND, FINANCE DIRECTOR Attachment(s): Project Description and Work Plan, Summary of Fees 11 -JUN -01 01:38PM FROM-RRM D N GROUP a O ,.JUYJY COV iZ• ne aaty OT rIermosa Beach; Page 3 80554346090 T-900 P.03/04 F-045 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPANSION AND REMODEL OF THE MAIN FIRE STATION SECTION 1 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT UNDERSTANDING • Renovation and addition to the existing fire station originally built in 1954. The project goals include the addition of square footage to the second floor for additional sleeping areas, bathroom(s), office space, and to provide accommodations for female firefighters. The goal of the first floor renovation is to provide a more efficient work environment, meeting .the changing operational demands of the department and to bring it into conformance with OSHA regulations. The project scope includes as - built of the existing facility, programming, conceptual design, and project budgeting. • Site improvements could include the under -grounding of existing overhead utilities and relocation access/response routing on- and off-site. SECTION 2 - PROJECT WORK PLAN The following is the proposed work plan and strategy developed by RRM for the Hermosa Beach Fire Department Renovation project. This plan will be led through the collaboration of the RRM San Pedro office for site investigation and client interface combined with the design and planning expertise of the San Luis Obispo office. TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAID Approach: The Project Management Plan is to serve as the road map for the work ahead. This report will be the result of the architect's research and discussions with the Fire Department Design Committee. The report will focus on .project goals and procedures. The goals will be: Budget, time, aesthetic, and function for each station and the administration building. The procedures will be: key contacts for information or decisions, anticipated "events" for approval, and regulatory agency requirements. The report will also include the overall project schedule and focused schedules for each main task. Products: • An 8-1/2" x 11" report containing project goal statements and management procedures. • A critical path time line of the schedule for design, production, and approval of the project. Schedule: One (1) week Meetings: Project kickoff and goal setting meeting with the project team TASK 2: SITE INVESTIGATION AND AS -BUILT DRAWINGS Approach: The RRM team will spend two (2) days in Hermosa Beach measuring and documenting the existing fire station slated for rehabilitation. Based on existing available data, the team will evaluate the building systems with our team of structural, mechanical, and electrical consultants. The site analysis will be a review of the current operations that occur at the site. The site will be evaluated for vehicle access, utility locations, parking and opportunities for temporary facility locations and construction staging. It is assumed that a site plan of the existing facility is available for use in the development of this site analysis. RRM Design Group 11 -JUN -01 01:39PM FROM-RRM All GROUP ...o vi�y v. ..v.... , a neacn; rage 4 8055434609 • T-900 P.04/04 F-045 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPANSION AND REMODEL OF THE MAIN FIRE STATION Products: • Blue Prints — Verification of the as -built drawings of the existing facility. It is assumed that drawings of the existing facility do exist and will be used as a basis of this verification. - • Site Analysis — Graphic display of the site development factors. Schedule: Two (2) weeks TASK 3: PROGRAMMING Approach: The RRM team is to formulate a clear program statement, which will serve as a basis for the renovation of the facility. Through direct contact with the fire chief, and design committee representatives from each shift, RRM will document current and future space needs, address safety and security requirements, and functional relationships. A key to the program will be the completion of a comprehensive equipment list, which will include the design criteria for equipment. Integrated into the program will be the conclusion from a preliminary seismic rehabilitation report of the station prepared by Cash and Associates. The program will record the specific goals and priorities concerning the seismic renovation, energy efficiency, and maintainability of materials in the renovated station. The program will include component diagrams, which lay out crucial design components such as turnout gear storage, kitchen, sleeping layouts, and office spaces as they fit into the existing building. Products: • Programming statement and graphics presenting the project basis for design • Preliminary seismic evaluation — text with graphic descriptions • Produce budget based on square foot costs and lump sums for equipment Schedule: Three (3) weeks TASK 4: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND PROJECT BUDGETING Approach: Based on the project programs and site analysis, the architectural team will produce one (1) conceptual building layout. The conceptual design will include a site plan and exterior sketch perspective showing the massing of the existing building with its addition/renovation. The intent of this conceptual study is to be able to identify the operational priorities of the department as they affect the cost of the project. It is assumed that the current funds available may not be sufficient to meet the long-term operational needs of the department. The goal of this study is CO determine the basic operational demand of the department, apply them spatially to the existing facility and to determine levels of costs for the improvements. Through this comparative analysis, the design team can lead the project into the next phase with a strong understanding of the operational priorities and the various costs assigned to meet those priorities. Products: • Conceptual floor plan and site plan layout with phasing descriptions and temporary facilities shown as necessary • Overall building massing study • Comprehensive Project Budget with a maximum of three (3) alternative budgets being developed Schedule: Three (3) weeks RRM Design Group -Hece vea:. u/17G/u1 ,':1; a r 12 -JUN -01 04:24PM FROM-RRM D LSU00YJ4ou`J ne Baty us nwcsusa d ocnun; ruacr- a GROUP 8055434609 7-937 P.02/04 F-119 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAIN FIRE STATION EXPANSION AND REMODEL FEE SUMMARY ii h f. •7 ,7'�%. �! arr fj ! ..t_-' :/;t:',:: �'� � ) »r 1.q t s ':� a:-,4.,:et;��,� ,�.:, , 4 -�TASiC, � .:�.. ..t= ,;r fy - ..: AMfOUNV:.1: Task 1: Project Management and Kick Off Architecture Services $1,720 Sub Total $1,720 Task 2: Site Investigation and As -Built Drawings Architecture Services $3,660 Structural Engineering $1,650 Mechanical Engineering $1,100 Electrical Engineering $1,100 Independent Cost Estimating $275 Sub Total $7,785 Task 3: Programming Architecture Services $5,240 Sub Total $5,240 Task 4: Conceptual Design and Project Budgeting Architecture Services $7,480 Structural Engineering $1,650 Mechanical Engineering $1,100 Electrical Engineering$1,100 Independent Cost Estimating $1,430 Sub Total $12,760 TOTAL FOR ALL PHASES $27,505 REIMBURSABLE BUDGET The above fee does not include project reimbursables. RRM recommends that the City budget 10% of the professional services fee (or approx. $2,700) for reimbursable expenses. Please see attached Exhibit A-1 for reimbursable unit costs and a list of possible expenses. • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • 7// VC)/ July 2, 2001 Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 SUBJECT: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 01-3 & PARKING PLAN AMENDMENT 01-1 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY -- THE HERMOSA PAVILION APPELANT: SHOOK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 220 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 110, IRVINE , CA 90025 REQUESTS: TO EXPAND AND REMODEL AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONVERTING THE THEATRE AND RETAIL USES TO A HEALTH AND FITNESSCLUBAND OFFICE USE. AMENDED PARKING PLAN FOR SHARED PARKING TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED HEALTH AND FITNESS FACILITY IN CONJUNCTION WITH OFFICE AND RETAIL USES Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Project History: o May 15, 2001, the Planning Commission considered the project application to expand and remodel the facility under a revised development program and denied the request. ❑ January 19, 1999, the Planning Commission approved a Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan for shared parking and Variance for expansion and remodel to the Hermosa Pavilion to accommodate a health and fitness center and expanded retail floor area, and to allow enclosure of the upper deck to exceed the height limit. o July 20, 1999 the Commission approved an amendment to the project with additional retail floor area. The project was never implemented and the Precise Development Plan expired. The Variance remains in effect until September 2001, but cannot be implemented without the Precise Development Plan ❑ August 17, 1999, the Planning Commission approved a Variance, as amended, for the expanded enclosure of the upper deck. o July 15, 1986 project Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan for shared parking were originally approved for theater, retail and office use with valet assisted parking. Proposed Project: The Planning Commission denied a slightly larger project, which included an 8,400 square foot office mezzanine and 7,000 square feet of additional health and fitness center. The proposed project submitted on appeal is based upon a similar plan but has 106,000 square feet or total floor area. Overall, the gross floor area will increase by 33,140 square feet over the original plan approval in 1986 but is 2,597 square feet smaller than the previously approved plan in 1999. The current owner of the building does not intend to implement the project, but is proposing the changes in order to attract a new buyer for the building. The changes are summarized below: Previous Use Allocation 7/99 Project (expired) Allocation Proposed Project Allocation AMC Theatre Beauty Supply Vacant Retail/Rest. Total 26,680 SF 920 SF 45,260 SF 72,860 SF Fitness Club Retail Restaurant Total 44,476 64,121 0 108,597 Fitness Club Retail Office Restaurant Total 45,000 5,000 56,000 0 106,000 1 ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: LOT SIZE: PARKING PROVIDED: SPA £1Ppecific Plan Area Commercial Corridor 79,460 Square Feet 504 Total — 440 First Access 31 Tandem 33 Parallel ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Recommended Mitigated Negative Declaration Background: The Hermosa Pavilion was constructed in 1987. At that time, the building was constructed in compliance with zoning requirements in effect at that time, which included a height limit of 45 feet. The proposed use was a mix of theatre, restaurant and retail uses, however, only the theatre use has been fully occupied. The building has been vacant for the last three years and the source of code enforcement problems including deferred maintenance, vandalism and vagrants. At their meeting of April 19, 2001, the Staff Environmental Review Committee recommended a mitigated negative declaration for the project based upon the supplemental parking and traffic studies which addressed the project changes. The proposed mitigation measure requires implementation of a valet assisted parking program on a daily basis as previously recommended for the 1999 project and the original project in 1986. Analysis The proposed plan revision involves interior alterations and additions to remove restaurant and theaters uses and replace them with the health and fitness club, offices, and a small amount of retail. The building frontage will be extended to the street edge at the ground level and the upper floor will be enclosed. Since the Planning Commission hearing of May 15`h, the owner has submitted a revised plan which reduces the amount of gym and office by 16,000 square feet in order to reduce the amount of valet assisted parking which was a primary concern of the Commission. However, the operation and management of the parking is significantly changed under both plans from the 1999 project, since the peak parking times will be every weekday, requiring the daily use of valet parking to accommodate employees or tenants of the primary office uses. PARKING Parking is projected to be satisfied within the parking structure due to the proposed new mix of uses with varying times of peak parking demand. The applicant has submitted a revised Shared Parking Analysis (dated June 27, 2001), prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan (updating a February 8, 2001 study which supplemented the 1998 analysis) The shared parking analysis is intended to demonstrate that the existing parking supply will be sufficient for the proposed mix of uses based upon peak and off-peak usage. The parking structure contains 504 spaces which are to be reconfigured and restriped to include 440 first access spaces, 31 tandem (second access) spaces and 33 parallel aisle -parking spaces. Valet assistance will be provided for the tandem spaces and the parallel aisle spaces. The analysis shows that based on the City's parking requirements the proposed mix of uses results in a total parking requirement of 694 spaces (Table B). This calculation is based on net floor area, and excludes common areas/internal circulation within the office area. This calculation, however, does not take into account the peak parking requirements and hourly variation in parking demand for each individual use in a mixed-use project. Therefore, the study includes a shared demand parking analysis based on the methodology and hourly parking adjustment factors developed by the Urban Land Institute (Table C and D). The parking demand rates used for the health cluli are based on a study of a 24-hour fitnesfacility in Santa Monica conducted in 1998, (6.75 spaces required per 1000 square feet at peak times) and the parking rates for the office uses are based on the parking requirements in the Zoning Code (4 spaces per 1,000 square feet). The study does not explain whether the attributes of this location are similar enough to justify comparison to the Santa Monica facility. The City's Traffic Engineer reviewed this parking study, and found the premise of the shared parking analysis acceptable, but questions the transferability of the parking rates found in Santa Monica for the health club analyzed, which are less than the City's parking requirements. His conclusion is that the study is valid only if it can be confirmed that the Santa Monica facility used for comparison has similar membership and patronage. and is in a similar type of location where most of the patrons will drive to the facility. Parking Tabulation: Proposed Use Allocation Code Requirement Number Peak Shared Weekday 11:00 AM Peak Shared Weekend 11:00 A.M. Fitness Club 45,000 SF 10 per 1000 sq. ft 450 219* 299* Retail 5,000SF 4 per 1000 sq. ft 20 17 15 Office 56,000 SF 4 per 1000 sq. ft 224 224 29 Total 106,000 SF 694 460 339 *Based on assumed parking rate of 6.75 spaces per 1000 square feet. The analysis concludes that the highest shared parking demand occurs weekdays at 11:00 A.M. for the combination of uses and is projected at 460 spaces (11 space surplus). Saturday peak shared parking demand occurs at mid-day and is projected at 339 spaces (132 space surplus): The on-site supply is 471 spaces, with the tandem parking included. The supply can be increased to 504 spaces with valet assisted parallel parking behind the standard stalls. Therefore, only with valet assisted tandem parking is the parking supply sufficient to meet projected demand, according to the study. Since the overall peak demand would be reached every weekday, the second access or "valet" spaces will have to be used on a regular basis. The previous approved mix of uses reached peak usage only on Saturdays and would have required use of valet parking only on Saturdays. The current proposal therefore places a higher burden on daily parking operation and management. This brings up the question whether the proposed intensity and mix of uses is appropriate for valet assistance, since office employees or customers of the health clubs are not necessarily accustomed to using valet parking. In the revised parking study, the applicant is proposing to have discount priced monthly parking passes to encourage office employees to use the tandem parking. PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT/ S.P.A. 8 ZONE COMPLIANCE The Specific Plan Area zone includes two sets of development standards. This two tier approach was established to allow development that complies with the first tier standards as a matter of right without a Precise Development Plan. In this case, the project exceeds first tier standards for bulk (greater than 1:1 F.A.R.), and maximum size (greater than 10,000 square feet). Thus, the Precise Development Plan review is required for the project to exceed these first tier standards. Also, the plans require implementation of the Variance previously granted for building height. 3 Pursuant to the specific ltdards of the S.P.A. 8 zone and the unde ing C-3 zoning, other than the need for approval of a Parking Plan to comply with parking requirements and a Variance to comply with height, the project conforms with the S.P.A. 8 zoning requirements. As described in the previous PDP for this project, the proposed revised expansion is generally within the existing building footprint (a portion of the building entry will be reconfigured and is achieved by remodeling within the building, and enclosing some outdoor deck areas). The remodeling includes converting a large portion of existing retail and restaurant spaces for use as a office or the health and fitness club, converting the existing service loading and storage areas to a pool and basketball court, and adding internal stairways to internally connect the three level health and fitness club. On the most visible elevations on P.C.H. and 6th Street, the building facade is proposed to be completely remodeled. A contemporary design is proposed to replace an existing eclectic mix of rooflines and materials. The proposed design includes curved architectural features, storefront glass and standing seam arched metal roof to help articulate the building facade. These improvements are carried to the south and east building elevations. The proposed plan revisions are consistent with the previously approved project design. The new proposed plan revisions will eliminate the central retail corridor/arcade and escalators, converting that space for the health club. The second floor retail corridor/arcade would also be eliminated to convert that space for office purposes. These changes result in a total of 33,140 square feet more of interior space than the 1987 plan. No additional building coverage, reduction of landscaping, or changes to building setbacks are proposed. The building contains only nominal landscaping on the P.C.H. frontage which is nonconforming to landscape standards of S.P.A. 8. Existing building setbacks adjacent to residential uses are 14 feet from the rear property line and 12 feet from the north side property line. The parking structure is proposed to be maintained with respect to overall parking supplies but will be improved and made more attractive with new lighting, paint, directional signing and new striping under the revised plans. CONCUR: Sol Blumen eld, Director Community evelopment Department Steph' .:"rrell City anager n ertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Planning Commission Minutes/Resolution 2. Revised Parking Study/Supplemental Parking Study 3. 1999 supplement, and 1998 original parking and traffic study (ava i lab le on file in Community Development Department) pdp1605pchappeal 9. PDP 01-3/PARK 01-1— PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PARKING PLAN FOR ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTER TO ACCOMMODATE OFFICES, A HEALTH AND FITNESS CLUB, AND RETAIL USES, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HERMOSA PAVILION. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Director Blumenfeld gave a staff report and reviewed the history of the project. He indicated that the health and fitness center is still proposed as the main component of the proposal, and the project retail would be eliminated and replaced by office space with a net increase of office space of approximately 14,000 square feet. Also, the parking demand has changed, and the owner submitted a shared parking demand study. He noted that the current proposal would place a higher burden on the daily parking requirement and management due to increased valet parking, however he said that the City's Traffic Engineer has informed that less traffic would be generated with the office use rather than the retail. The project would require a Precise Development Plan, and approval of a Parking Plan to comply with parking requirements. An existing Variance is in effect to enclose the outdoor deck area and the project otherwise conforms with the S.P.A. 8 zoning requirements. He said that the property would be reconfigured within the existing building footprint but there would be a substantial change to add to a mezzanine area to maximize office space. Also, the parking structure would be improved with painting, lighting, new directional signage and striping. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing. Mr. Gene Shook, ITC Real Estate Group, stated that 24 Hour Fitness has agreed that their employees would use the tandem spaces, and he said that the office tenants could be required to have their employees use the tandem spaces, also. This would eliminate the majority of the spaces used for valet. He noted that the parking intensity will be substantially less with office compared to the previous retail uses. Additionally, he said they have eliminated several spaces to help smooth the flow of traffic. He pointed out that the third floor will look the same; however, a mezzanine area has been added in the middle of the building where the loading dock area is located. He further explained the delay of completing the building, and stated that the requirements of some of the retail tenants were extensive and costly, and the rental rates were not feasible. He also said that the property has been in and out of escrow, and he noted that 24 Hour Fitness has not had a strong financial statement, making it difficult to get, a loan. He stated that he needs to have approval to move forward with the project and obtain office tenants. In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Mr. Shook explained that there have been a number of tenants shown the building. P.C. Minutes 05-15-01 In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Gary Wiggle, Keisler & Wiggle Architects, stated that more of a truck dock will be created rather than a full drive in loading area. Mr. Shook further said that 24 Hour Fitness is proposing to have various courts, a swimming pool and spa, locker rooms, day spa and kids area which will have a low density of use. In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Mr. Shook stated there is a tight market in the area for large square footage areas, and he believed that if the project were approved, they should obtain tenants fairly quickly. He also hoped that he could get a tenant within a year. He pointed out that it typically takes several months in the lease process. He also said it takes further time going through an approval process with the City, the construction bidding process and construction start date. In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Mr. Shook explained that they have a signed a 15 -year lease with 24 Hour Fitness and is anxious to be operating in the property. In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Mr. Shook explained that it is difficult for large retail tenants to be on a level other than the ground level due to inconvenience and lack of feasibility. In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Mr. Shook stated that 5,000 square feet of retail has been included in an area that would not be obstructive to the 24 Hour Fitness or the office tenants. Mr. Shook noted that the restaurant uses have been eliminated which would require a much heavier parking load than office. Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman expressed concern with parking and maximizing the square footage. He noted that the ULI data is 20 years old and parking demands have changed. He also would like to see further information on landscaping. He said there are many unknowns such as who will be leasing the offices and retail. Commissioner Tucker also expressed concern with maximizing the parking, and he said he is not in favor of the tandem parking for the employees, and valet parking would be too confusing. He also said there is a lot of office space for rent in the area and it may be difficult to find tenants. Commissioner Kersenboom expressed concern with the length of time that the project has been lingering with nothing happening. He further expressed concern with the parking. Chairman Perrotti also expressed concern with parking. He said he is not convinced that the valet parking would work, and it is unknown who will be leasing the spaces. He also is unsure if the employees would use tandem parking. He said he would like to see further landscaping on Pacific Coast Highway. He believed that the interior is being maximized, and he agreed that it has been frustrating for the Commissioners and residents with regard to the building. 6 P.C. Minutes 05-15-01 In response to Chairman Perrotti, Director Blumenfeld indicated that there is room for street trees and pockets for landscaping in the front. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Chairman Perrotti to DENY PDP 01-3/PARK 01-1 — Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan for alterations to an existing retail and entertainment center to accommodate offices, a health and fitness club, and retail uses, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 1605 Pacific Coast.Highway, Hermosa Pavilion, based on the parking plan not accommodating the usage of the building. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chairman Perrotti NOES: None ABSENT: Pizer ABSTAIN: None STAFF ITEMS a. . ode interpretation of snack shop in connection with business at 49 Pier Av ue (co inued from April 17, 2001 meeting). City Planner Sch. .ach stated that a hood would be required for an oven, rotiss e or a grill and would constitute a r taurant use. The Commission AGRE 1 BY MINUTE ORDER that the use wou • constitute a restaurant use. b. Tentative future Planning . i mmission agenda. c. Community Development Depar ent Activ. y Report of March, 2001. d. City Council minutes of April 10 and 2001. 14. COMMISSIONER ITEMS Commissioner Tucker suggested ad ng to the definition of s ck shop that the requirement to have a Type I hood would chang e use from a snack shop to a -staurant. Commissioner Hoffman re• ested that those who have contacted the Ocean View issue be no ' ied directly. In response to Ch.'rman Perrotti, Director Blumenfeld said that the City Counci posted on the y Website. He also said a list of all email addresses for the Depart provided to e Commissioners. mission regarding the mutes are ent will be Com ' ssioner Tucker suggested putting the Text Amendment items at the end of the Agenda. 7 P.C. Minutes 05-15-01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 01-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO A PARKING PLAN FOR AN EXPANSION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING, "THE HERMOSA PAVILION;" AND FOR SHARED PARKING TO ACCOMMODATE A NEW ALLOCATION OF USES WITHIN THE CENTER AT 1605 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Shook Development Corporation owner of property at 1605 Pacific Coast Highway, known as the "Hermosa Pavilion", seeking a Precise Development Plan and amendment to a previously approved Parking Plan to remodel and expand an existing commercial building and to allow shared parking to accommodate a new allocation of uses within the building including a health and fitness facility, office uses and retail uses. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan amendment on May 15, 2001, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The Hermosa Pavilion retail and entertainment complex was originally approved in 1986, with said approval consisting of a Parking Plan for shared parking and a Conditional Use Permit for a 6-plex movie theatre ( P.C. Resolution 86-40) which was implemented on the project site. Recently the Commission approved a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan amendment (Resolution P.C. 99-3) to expand and reconfigure the uses within the complex, and an amendment thereto (Resolution P.C. 99-46) that eliminated the restaurant uses. These amendments have not been implemented and have expired. The applicant is now proposing a different allocation of uses, summarized as follows: Previous Use Allocation 7/99 Project (expired) Allocation Proposed Project Allocation AMC Theatre 26,680 SF Fitness Club 44,476 Fitness Club 52,000 Beauty Supply 920 SF Retail 64,121 Retail 5,000 Vacant(Retail 45,260 SF Restaurant 0 Office 65,000 and Rest.) Restaurant 0 Total 72,860 SF Total 108,597 Total 122,000* 1 2. The parking structure will contain 504 parking spaces in the existing six -level parking structure, with 440 "first access" spaces, 31 tandem spaces (second access), and 33 parallel aisle spaces. Valet assistance is proposed to for the tandem and parallel aisle spaces. 3. The site is zoned S.P.A. 8 which requires a Precise Development Plan for a remodel and expansion project that exceeds 10,000 square feet and exceeds a floor area to lot area ratio of 1:1. A Parking Plan is necessary to amend the existing approved shared parking arrangement in order to comply with the parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan Amendment: 1. The existing parking supplemented with valet service is not adequate for the proposed increase in square footage, and the new mix of uses which have similar peak parking demand periods on weekdays. 2. Pursuant to Section 17.44.210 of the Zoning .Ordinance, the Planning Commission may approve a reduction in the number of parking spaces required if satisfied that a proposed mix of uses has varying peak hours of parking needs, and parking supply is adequate for the peak times. While the applicant provided a parking study to show that parking demand is projected to be satisfied by the existing supply within the parking structure, satisfying this demand requires regular use of valet parking, placing a high demand on parking operation and management. Further, the use of a such a significant number of second access parking spaces (in tandem, or parallel aisle) for employees and/or health club users during weekdays is not appropriate, and will likely be confusing and inefficient. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby denies the subject Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Chmn. Perrotti, NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Pizer CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 01-15 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their reg meetin of May 15, 2001. i am Perrotti, Chairman Date Sol Blumenf ld, ecretary pdpr1605am MEMORANDUM TO: Harold Williams, Public Works Director Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director FROM: Richard Garland, Contract Traffic Engineer Stevens -Garland Associates DATE: July 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Hermosa Beach Pavilion Shared Parking Analysis I have reviewed the "Revised Parking Study Report Update — Hermosa Beach Pavilion" prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan on June 27, 2000 and submit the following comments. • The general methodology for the shared parking analysis is acceptable, as the overriding premise for the study is that the peak parking demand for the development should not be the sum of the parking requirements for the individual components but should instead be a lower value because of the hourly variations in parking demand for the various uses. While this approach is valid, the conclusions are based on a key assumption that may or may not be totally applicable to this particular project, as detailed below. • The assumption is that the peak parking demand for the 24 -Hour Fitness facility should be set at 6.75 spaces per thousand square feet (KSF) instead of the 10 spaces per KSF currently required by the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. This proposed reduction is based on the results of a parking study that was conducted at an existing 24 -Hour Fitness facility in. Santa Monica in September 1998. While the parking counts conducted at that facility are undoubtedly accurate, I would be hesitant to assume that the findings are readily transferable to the proposed facility at Hermosa Beach unless it can be confirmed that the Santa Monica site had a full membership and patronage at the time of the survey, that it is at a location where most of the patrons drive to the facility as an independent trip (rather than walk from work or home), and that the September data reflect a time of peak patronage for the facility. Unless it can be confirmed that these issues are similar for the two sites, it would be more appropriate to use the existing Hermosa Beach rates. • If the Hermosa Beach requirement of 10 parking spaces per KSF for the fitness center were to be used instead of the reduced rate of 6.75 spaces per KSF, the shared parking analysis would indicate that there is not a sufficient number of on-site spaces to accommodate the peak parking demand. • The proposal to provide an attendant to facilitate the use of tandem and parallel parking spaces is technically feasible, as it is successfully used in many parking structures in high-density locations. It is, however, an inconvenience for the users and could result in some people avoiding the structure and seeking alternative off-site parking locations. • In summary, the study indicates that the proposed parking facility can accommodate the site's parking demand. This conclusion, however, can only be accepted if it can also be accepted that the peak parking demand for the fitness center is only 67.5 percent of the City of Hermosa Beach's code requirement and that employees of the retail, office, and fitness center uses would be amenable to the use of parking attendants in the structure. 1f LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ENGINEERS & PLANNERS • TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 East Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 • Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: 626 796-2322 • Fax: 626 792-0941 June 27, 2001 Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group 220 Technology Drive, Suite 110 Irvine, California 92618 RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2001 COM. DEV, DEPT Subject: Revised Parking Study Report Update - Hermosa Beach Pavilion 1650 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach; California Dear Gene: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this revised parking study report update in connection with the existing Hermosa Beach Pavilion building and associated parking structure at 1650 Pacific Coast Highway, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. It is our understanding that the City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission has rejected the proposed project that was previously analyzed. Based on your direction, the parking study report update has been revised to analyze a less intense alternative project. However, it should be understood that the previous project satisfied the parking demand based on sound traffic engineering analyses. Summary We find that the on-site parking supply of 504 spaces (with attendant assistance for tandem and for parallel parking) is sufficient to meet the projected parking demand. This is based on a shared parking analysis which takes into account the hourly variation in parking demand of the planned 24 - Hour Fitness facility, the planned office use and the planned retail use. The proposed project will utilize the 440 standard parking spaces and the 31 tandem parking spaces (with attendant assistance). If necessary, the 33 parallel parking spaces are available for use with additional attendant assistance. Based on the proposed project, the peak parking demand is expected to occur on weekdays with 460 occupied spaces at 10:00 AM and 11:00 AM. In contrast, the peak parking demand on weekends is expected to be 339 occupied spaces at 11:00 AM. The peak parking demand is therefore expected to occur primarily as a result of the office component of the project along with the 24 -Hour Fitness facility during the week. Philip M. Linscott, P.E. (1924-2000) Jack M. Greenspan, P.E. William A. Law, P.E. (Ret.) Paul W. Wilkinson, P.E. John P. Keating, P.E. David S. Shender, P.E. John A. Boarman, P.E. Costa Mesa - 714 641-1587 • San Diego - 619 299-3090 • Las Vegas - 702 451-1920 • An LG2WB Company LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group June 27, 2001 Page Two Further, it is anticipated that monthly parking passes will be available for the office personnel, the 24 -Hour Fitness staff and the retail employees. The monthly passes for tandem parking spaces are expected to be priced at a discount over the monthly passes for standard parking spaces. Thus, during the week, it is expected that parking passes for the tandem spaces will be purchased by office personnel, 24 -Hour Fitness staff and/or retail employees. Further, should the demand for the discounted monthly passes exceed the supply of tandem parking spaces, the parallel parking spaces could be utilized with additional attendant assistance. This would increase the supply of available parking spaces. Currently, without the parallel parking spaces, a parking surplus of 11 spaces is expected during the weekday peak parking demand. The addition of 33 parallel parking spaces on weekdays would increase the expected parking surplus to 44 spaces. A parking surplus of 101 spaces is expected during the peak parking demand on the weekend, when only the standard parking spaces are utilized. Thus, on the weekend, the tandem and parallel parking spaces are not required and an attendant would not need to be provided. The discounted monthly passes for parking in the tandem or parallel spaces on weekdays would allow for parking in the standard spaces on the weekend. Prior Parking Studies This "Revised Parking Study Report Update" modifies the previous "Parking Study Report Update" dated February 8, 2001, which supplements the approved November, 1998, Linscott, Law & Greenspan parking impact analysis prepared for the Hermosa Beach Pavilion (Parking and Traffic Impact Analysis, 24 -Hour Fitness, Hermosa Beach Pavilion, City of Hermosa Beach, California, November 30, 1998) and further supplements the subsequently approved July, 1999, update entitled Parking Study Report - Hermosa Beach Pavilion. At that time, the 24 -Hour Fitness facility was to occupy 39,460 square feet and plans called for retail use to occupy the remaining 64,121 square feet after closure of the AMC "Art -House" Theatre. A potential need to park 494 vehicles was identified and satisfied by the on-site parking supply of 504 spaces (with valet parking). Proposed Project The proposed alternative project contains the same land uses as the previously analyzed project (i.e. a 24 -Hour Fitness facility, retail use and office use), however, the square footage for the 24 -Hour Fitness facility has been reduced from 52,000 gross square feet to 45,000 gross square feet and the office use has been reduced from 65,000 gross square feet to 56,000 gross square feet. The retail use will remain at 5,000 gross square feet. The proposed project allocation is displayed on Table A, located at the rear of this letter report. A copy of the project site floor plan, provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc., is included in Appendix A. • • LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group June 27, 2001 Page Three As shown on Table A, and indicated on the project site floor plan in Appendix A, the 24 -Hour Fitness facility contains 45,000 square feet of net floor area, the retail space contains 5,000 square feet of net floor area and the office space contains 56,000 square feet of net floor area. The proposed project includes 440 standard parking spaces and 31 tandem parking spaces. An attendant will be available to provide assistance for parking vehicles in the tandem parking spaces. Further, a total of 33 parallel parking spaces are available for use with additional attendant assistance. However, these spaces are not currently proposed to be utilized. Code Parking Requirement The City of Hermosa Beach Code parking requirements for the proposed project are displayed on Table B. As shown on Table B, direct application of the City Code produces a requirement for 694 parking spaces for the proposed project. However, it is recognized that the City Code parking factors represent the peak parking requirement for each individual use, and do not take into account the hourly variation in parking demand generated by each use. Further, fitness facility parking rates have typically decreased in recent years as more facilities incorporate uses that allow fewer members per square foot (such as basketball courts and swimming pools). Thus, a fitness facility parking demand analysis is included as part of this letter report. 24 -Hour Fitness Parking Demand To determine the hourly parking demand generated by a 24 -Hour Fitness facility at the Hermosa Beach Pavilion, a similar 24 -Hour Fitness Facility in Santa Monica was analyzed. A count ofparked vehicles within the Santa Monica facility parking area (i.e., a parking accumulation count) was conducted at half-hour intervals from 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM on a typical weekend day and on a typical weekday in late September, 1998. The peak period was determined to be at 7:00 PM on the weekday when 243 vehicles were parked for the Santa Monica facility. Based on a facility size of 39,600 square feet and including a circulation factor often percent, the parking demand ratio for the 24 -Hour Fitness facility was calculated to be 6.75 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. This parking demand ratio is less than the City Code requirement of 10 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet and is more consistent with the typical layout of modern fitness facilities. Shared Parking Demand Analysis The shared parking demand analysis takes into account the hourly variation in parking demand of the planned 24 -Hour Fitness facility, the office use and the retail use. The peak retail day is on the weekend, which is analyzed in Table C. The 24 -Hour Fitness and office peak days occur during the week, which is analyzed in Table D. LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group June 27, 2001 Page Four This analysis is based on the methodology and hourly parking adjustment factors developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), and on 24 -Hour Fitness facility parking data developed for the original parking impact analysis (November, 1998), and subsequently utilized in the updated parking impact analysis (July, 1999). The 24 -Hour Fitness facility parking demand ratio, and hourly parking adjustment factors are the same as those used in the approved July, 1999, parking impact analysis. The key measures for the shared parking demand analysis are the hourly parking adjustment factors, the hourly parking demand generated by each use, the hourly shared parking demand and the hourly parking surplus or deficiency (if any). Further, on the weekend, the hourly parking surplus or deficiency is measured against the planned supply of 440 parking spaces (i.e., including the 440 standard parking spaces and excluding the 31 tandem parking spaces and the 33 parallel parking spaces). On the weekday, the hourly parking surplus or deficiency is measured against the planned supply of 471 parking spaces (i.e., including the 440 standard parking spaces and the 31 tandem parking spaces with attendant assistance and excluding the 33 parallel parking spaces). As shown on Table C, the weekend peak shared parking demand for the proposed project is in the late morning through noontime. At 11:00 AM, a need for 339 parking spaces is projected, leaving a 101 space surplus (based on a supply of 440 parking spaces). As shown on Table D, the weekday peak shared parking demand for the proposed project is in the late morning through early afternoon. At 10:00 AM and 11:00 AM, a need for 460 parking spaces is projected, leaving an 11 space surplus (based on a supply of 471 parking spaces). As shown in the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand during the week and on the weekends is a result of different components of the project. As shown on Table C, the peak parking demand on the weekend is primarily a result of the 24 -Hour Fitness facility and the retail component of the project. As shown on Table D, the peak parking demand during the week is primarily a result of the office component of the project and the 24 -Hour Fitness facility. This provides for an. opportunity to utilize the tandem (and if necessary the parallel) parking spaces during the week when the peak parking demand is primarily a result of the office component. Discounted monthly parking passes for the tandem (and parallel) parking spaces can be provided to the office personnel, 24 -Hour Fitness staff and retail employees. This will increase utilization of the tandem and parallel parking spaces thereby increasing availability of the standard parking spaces for office visitors, 24 -Hour Fitness members and retail patrons. Findings and Conclusions Based on the shared parking analysis, we project a peak parking demand of 460 spaces for the proposed project during the week and a peak parking demand of 339 spaces for the proposed project on the weekend. LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS • Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group June 27, 2001 Page Five With an on-site parking supply of 504 spaces (with attendant assistance available for tandem and parallel parking spaces), we conclude that sufficient parking is provided to meet the projected demand for the proposed project. The parallel parking spaces are not required during the week as the standard and tandem parking spaces will provide a parking supply that satisfies the weekday peak parking demand. An attendant is expected to be available during the weekday to provide assistance for the tandem parking spaces. It is expected that discounted monthly parking passes will be provided to attract office personnel, 24 -Hour Fitness staff and retail employees to utilize the tandem parking spaces. The tandem and parallel parking spaces are not expected to be utilized on the weekend as the standard parking spaces will provide a parking supply that satisfies the weekend peak parking demand. An attendant will not be necessary on the weekend. It is expected that the discounted monthly parking passes will allow for access to the standard parking spaces on the weekend. If necessary, the parallel parking spaces can be utilized during the week with additional attendant assistance to increase the availability of the standard parking spaces for office visitors, 24 -Hour Fitness members, and retail patrons. We welcome the opportunity to be of further service. Should there be any questions regarding this revised parking study report update for the Hermosa Beach Pavilion project, please do not hesitate to call me at 626.796.2322, or contact me directly via e-mail at greenspan@llgengineers.com. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Jack M. Greenspan, P.E. Principal JMG/MSH:ci Attachments O:UOB FILE1302413024RPT1.WPD /` LINSCOTT LAW Si GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table A SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOCATION [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion 06/27/2001 LOCATION 24-HOUR FITNESS GENERAL RETAIL GENERAL OFFICE TOTAL Lower Level 11,100 SF 0 SF 0 SF 11,100 SF Street Level 24,000 SF 5,000 SF 0 SF 29,000 SF Upper Level 9,900 SF 0 SF 56,000 SF 65,900 SF TOTAL NET 45,000 SF 5,000 SF 56,000 SF 106,000 SF [1] Source: Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table B CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion 06/27/2001 PROPOSED USE SIZE CODE REQUIREMENT' REQUIRED PARKING 24 -Hour Fitness 45,000 SF 1 space per 100 SF 450 spaces General Retail 5,000 SF 1 space per 250 SF 20 spaces General Office 56,000 SF 1 space per 250 SF 224 spaces TOTAL 106,000 SF 694 spaces [1] Parking code requirements per City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table C WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion 06/27/2001 LAND USE [3] 24-HOUR FITNESS [4] GENERAL RETAIL [4] GENERAL OFFICE SHARED PARKING DEMAND [7] PARKING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY SIZE [2] PARKING RATE 45.00 KSF 6.75 /KSF [5] 5.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 56.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] GROSS SPACES 304 SPACES 20 SPACES 224 SPACES TIME OF DAY % PEAK #OF SPACES % PEAK #OF SPACES %OF. PEAK #OF SPACES 6:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 440 7:00 AM 0% 0 3% 1 3% 7 8 432 8:00 AM 59% 179 10% 2 8% 18 199 241 9:00 AM 86% 261 30% 6 10% 22 289 151 10:00 AM 97% 295 45% 9 10% 22 326 114 11:00 AM 97% 295 73% 15 13% * 29 339 101 NOON 96% 292 85% 17 13% 29 338 102 1:00 PM 70% 213 95% 19 10% 22 254 186 2:00 PM 62% 188 100% 20 8% 18 226 214 3:00 PM 57% 173 100% 20 5% 11 204 236 4:00 PM 77% 234 90% 18 5% 11 263 177 5:00 PM 90% 274 75% 15 3% 7 296 144 6:00 PM 89% 271 65% 13 3% 7 291 149 7:00 PM 79% 240 60% 12 3% 7 259 181 8:00 PM 54% 164 55% 11 0% 0 175 265 9:00 PM 41% 125 40% 8 0% 0 133 307 10:00 PM 27% 82 38% 8 0% 0 90 350 11:00 PM 0% 0 13% 3 0% 0 3 437 MIDNIGHT 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 440 PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE 339 SPACES PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE 548 SPACES 03:11 PM NOTES: [1] Based on methodologies presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [2] Based on information provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [3] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages from studies by LLG. [4] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [5] Based on parking studies of the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Santa Monica by LLG. [6] Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Off -Street Parking Municipal Code. [7] Based on a proposed parking supply of 440 spaces (i.e., including 440 standard spaces and excluding 31 tandem and 33 parallel parking spaces). 19 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 1 Table D WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion LAND USE [3] 24-HOUR FITNESS [4] GENERAL RETAIL [4] GENERAL OFFICE SHARED PARKING DEMAND [7] PARKING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY. SIZE [2] PARKING RATE 45.00 KSF 6.75 /KSF [5] 5.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 56.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] GROSS SPACES 304 SPACES 20 SPACES 224 SPACES TIME OF DAY % PEAK #OF SPACES % PEAK #OF SPACES % PEAK #OF SPACES 6:00 AM 0% 0 . 0% 0 3% 7 7 464 7:00 AM 0% 0 8% 2 •20% 45 47 424 8:00 AM 54% 164 18% 4 63% 141 309 162 9:00 AM 50% 152 42% 8 93% 208 368 103 10:00 AM 73% 222 68% 14 100% 224 460 11 11:00 AM 72% 219 87% 17 100%• 224 460 11 NOON 56% 170 97% 19 90% 202 391 80 1:00 PM 55% 167 100% 20 90% 202 389 82 2:00 PM 42% 128 97% 19 97% 217 364 107 3:00 PM 45% 137 95% 19 93% 208 364 107 4:00 PM 57% 173 87% 17 77% 172 362 109 5:00 PM 77% 234 79% 16 47% 105 355 116 6:00 PM 95% 289 82% 16 23% 52 357 114 7:00 PM 100% 304 89% 18 7% 16 338 133 8:00 PM 88% 268 87% 17 7% 16 301 • 170 9:00 PM 62% 188 . 61% 12 3% 7 207 264 10:00 PM 57% 173 32% 6 3% 7 186 285 11:00 PM 0% 0 13% 3 0% 0 3 468 MIDNIGHT 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 _ 0 471 PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE 460 SPACES PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE 548 SPACES NOTES: [1] Based on methodologies presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [2] Based on information provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [3] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages from studies by LLG. [4] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [5] Based on parking studies of the 24 -Hour Fitness facility in Santa Monica by LLG. [6] Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Off -Street Parking Municipal Code. [7] Based on a proposed parking supply of 471 spaces (i.e., including 440 standard spaces and 31 tandem parking spaces and excluding 33 parallel parking spaces). Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX A Project Site Floor Plan '-1 H E R M O S A BEACH VILICON Pacific Coast Highway at 16th Street • PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN 2y u June 27.2'001 Veiskr W ge Actifect. H E R. M O.S A • BEACH PLVL 0 Pacific Coast Highway. at 16th Street gig WEER ammommmimmummomi PROPOSED STREET LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ■&5 0 f r 141. sr Ve s e Achtect r..14-• ^•!/•• -.ri I- • HERMOSA 6 EAC H LON Pacific Coast Highway at 16th Street nn' MINN 1111# OWN u(nr, r i j PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN az June 27. 7001 Keister vVig e Aichtecfi_ Tom.__ 1 _C 1 Naoma Valdes From: Sabo Associates <bsabo@jsaboassoc.com> To: <nvaldes@hermosabch.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 8:58 AM Subject: Re: Hermosa Pavillion Hi, I must make a correction to the previous email...I was actually referencing the Hermosa Pavillion, NOT the Hermosa Plaza. Please disregard the previous email. Thank you! I spoke with Steve Burrell yesterday regarding the Hermosa Pavillion owner's request for extension of permits on the property. I would like to make a formal request of the Planning Commission to deny the request based on the fact that the owner obviously has no interest in the interests/needs of this community. Evidently this owner has had many opportunities to upgrade and/or sell this property and has declined to do so. It is time for the Commission to "just say no" to this blatant disregard for the Hermosa community. The owner's failure to take action has resulted in Toss of parking, loss of tax revenue, and the degradation of PCH (as this "white elephant" definitely leads visitors to view Hermosa as a blighted community. Thank you in advance if you can forward this request to the Commission. If you cannot, please advise me on who to contact. Thank you! Best regards, Barbara Sabo Hermosa Beach (310) 372-8259 RECEIVED MAY 1 4 2001 COM. DEV. DEPT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Zs APR -10-01 09.10 FROM.CarlpComDevDept ID.:1,65749 PAGE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: KEN ROBERTSON, PLANNING FROM: RICHARD GARLAND, TRAFFIC ENGINEER SUBJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PAVILION TRAFFIC GENERATION COMPARISON DATE: APRIL 10, 2001 RECEIVED APR 1 0 2001 COM. DEV. DEPT. A table has been prepared by Linscott Law & Greenspan comparing the trip generation characteristics of the proposed land uses at the HB Pavilion with those of the previous use and the land use that was approved but not developed. The attached Table A indicates that the proposed project would generate approximately 3,010 vehicle trips per day. As a comparison, the previous uses on the site generated 5,733 daily trips and. the mix of land uses previously approved (but not developed) would have generated 6,901 trips per day. The proposed project would, therefore, generate less traffic than either the existing land uses or the project that was previously approved. During the AM peak hour, the proposed project would generate 189 vehicle trips. This compares to a volume of 205 trips for the previous uses on the site and 194 trips for the land use mix that was previously approved. Similarly, during the PM peak hour, the proposed project would generate 302 vehicle trips, which compares to 476 trips for the previous uses and 629 trips for the approved use. • The trip generation characteristics for all three time frames (AM peak hour, PM peak hour, and daily traffic volumes) all indicate that the proposed project would generate less traffic than the previous on-site land uses as well as the mix of uses previously approved for the site.. The only traffic category that would experience an increase is the inbound traffic volume during. the AM peak hour. This increase is offset, however, by a decrease in the number of outbound trips. The net change, therefore, is an overall decrease in the total traffic volume during the AM peak hour. . As the proposed project would generate less traffic as compared to either the previous land use mix or the previously approved land use scenario, it is concluded that there would be no adverse traffic impacts associated with the project. A detailed traffic impact analysis would not. therefore, be required. 2C, 04/10/01 08:23 TX/RX N0.0777 P.001 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ENGINEERS & PLANNERS • TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 East Colorado Blvd, Suite 400 • Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: 626 796-2322 • Fax: 626 792-0941 February 8, 2001 Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group 220 Technology Drive, Suite 110 Irvine, California 92618 FEB 1 2 2001 COM. DEV. DEPT. Subject: Parking Study Report Update - Hermosa Beach Pavilion 1650 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach; California Dear Gene: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this Parking Study Report in connection with the existing Hermosa Beach Pavilion building and associated parking structure at 1650 Pacific Coast Highway, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. Briefly, we find that the on-site parking supply of 504 spaces (with valet assisted parking) is sufficient to meet projected parking demand. This is based on a shared parking analysis which takes into account the hourly variation in parking demand of the planned 24 -Hour Fitness facility, the planned office use and the planned retail use. Prior Parking Studies This Parking Study Report Update supplements the approved November, 1998, Linscott, Law & Greenspan parking impact analysis prepared for the Hermosa Beach Pavilion (Parking and Traffic Impact Analysis, 24 -Hour Fitness, Hermosa Beach Pavilion, City of Hermosa Beach, California, November 30, 1998) and the subsequently approved July, 1999, update entitled Parking Study Report - Hermosa Beach Pavilion. At that time, the 24 -Hour Fitness facility was to occupy 39,460 square feet and plans called for retail use to occupy the remaining 64,121 square feet after closure of the AMC "Art -House" Theatre. A potential need to park 494 vehicles was identified and satisfied by the on-site parking supply (with valet parking). Philip M. Linscott, P.E. (Ret.) Jack M. Greenspan, P.E. William A. Law, P.E. (Ret.) Paul W. Wilkinson, P.E. John P. Keating, P.E. David S. Shender, P.E. Costa Mesa - 714 641-1587 • San Diego - 619 299-3090 • Las Vegas - 702 451-1920 • An LG2WB Company LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Current Project Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group February 8, 2001 Page Two As shown on Table A, the current project contains a larger 24 -Hour Fitness facility (52,000 gross square feet) and a smaller retail use (5,000 gross square feet) with the remainder of the building (65,000 gross square feet) to be for office use. The 24 -Hour Fitness facility will contain 49,400 square feet of net floor area after discounting for vertical circulation, while the office space will contain 60,000 square feet of net floor area after discounting for internal circulation and common areas. Code Parking Requirement The Hermosa Beach City Code parking requirements for the proposed project are shown on Table B, located at the rear of this letter report. As shown on Table B, direct application of the City Code produces a requirement for 754 parking spaces for the proposed project. However, it is recognized that the City Code parking factors represent the peak parking requirement for each individual use, and do not take into account the hourly variation in parking demand generated by each use. Shared Parking Demand Analysis The shared parking analysis, which takes into account the hourly variation in parking demand of the planned 24 -Hour Fitness facility, the office use and the retail use, are displayed on Tables C and D for the proposed project. Saturday is the peak retail day, and is analyzed in Table C. The 24 -Hour Fitness and office peak days occur during the week, which is analyzed in Table D. This analysis is based on the methodology and hourly parking adjustment factors developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), and on 24 -Hour Fitness facility parking data developed in the November,. 1998, parking impact analysis and subsequently utilized in the July, 1999, parking impact analysis. The 24 -Hour Fitness facility parking demand ratio, and hourly parking adjustment factors are the same as those used in the approved prior parking impact analyses. Shown on each table are the hourly parking adjustment factors, the hourly parking demand generated by each use, the hourly shared parking demand, and the hourly parking surplus or deficiency (if any) measured against the planned supply of 504 parking spaces. As shown on Table C, the Saturday peak shared parking demand for the proposed project is in the late morning through noontime. At 11:00 AM, a need for 368 parking spaces is projected, leaving a 136 space surplus. As shown on Table D, the weekday peak shared parking demand for the proposed project is in the late morning through early afternoon. At 11:00 AM, a need for 497 parking spaces is projected, leaving a seven space surplus. LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Finding and Conclusion Mr. Gene Shook ITC Real Estate Group February 8, 2001 Page Three Based on the shared parking analysis, we project a peak parking demand of 497 spaces for the proposed project. With an on-site parking supply of 504 spaces (with valet assisted parking), we conclude that sufficient parking is provided to meet projected demand for the proposed project. We welcome the opportunity to be of further service. Should there be any questions regarding this parking study report update for the Hermosa Beach Pavilion project, please do not hesitate to call me at 626.796.2322, or contact me directly via e-mail at greenspan@llgengineers.com. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Jrcke, Jack M. Greenspan, P.E. Principal JMG/MSH:ci Attachments O:UOB FILE13024\REPORT\3024RPT.WPD 2R LINSCOTT LAW `c GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table A SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOCATION [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion 02/08/2001 LOCATION 24-HOUR FITNESS GENERAL RETAIL GENERAL OFFICE TOTAL Lower Level 14,000 SF 0 SF 0 SF 14,000 SF Street Level 25,600 SF 5,000 SF 0 SF 30,600 SF Upper Level 12,400 SF 0 SF 56,600 SF 69,000 SF Mezzanine 0 SF 0 SF 8,400 SF 8,400 SF TOTAL GROSS 52,000 SF 5,000 SF 65,000 SF 122,000 SF Reduction [2] (2,600)SF 0 SF (5,000)SF (7,600)SF TOTAL NET 49,400 SF 5,000 SF 60,000 SF 114,400 SF [1] Source: Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [2] Includes a 5.0 percent reduction in floor area for vertical circulation within the 24 -Hour Fitness and a 7.7 percent reduction for common areas/internal circulation within the General Office space. 30 LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table B CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion 02/08/2001 PROPOSED USE SIZE CODE REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PARKING 24 -Hour Fitness 49,400 SF 1 space per 100 SF 494 spaces General Retail 5,000 SF 1 space per 250 SF 20 spaces General Office 60,000 SF - 1 space per 250 SF 240 spaces TOTAL 114,400 SF 754 spaces [1] Parking code requirements per City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. 3) LINSCOTT LAW GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table C SATURDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion 02/08/2001 LAND USE [3] 24-HOUR FITNESS [4] GENERAL RETAIL [4] GENERAL OFFICE SHARED PARKING DEMAND [71 PARKING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY SIZE [2] PARKING RATE 49.40 KSF 6.75 /KSF [5] 5.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 60.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] GROSS SPACES ' 333 SPACES 20 SPACES 240 SPACES TIME OF DAY % PEAK #OF SPACES % PEAK #OF SPACES % PEAK #OF SPACES 6:00 AM §MOf�:'�ftf:=':.......fo-.......:r.....1�.,r:.......3.10-::,;::=�::=:.....r.. 8:00 AM:.,.:...j...59%0.,......,....196 ...Q'AA+t';=�� ....;:10:00 AM =<1.(301�f+r#=:'_=.. r.,.r.r.r.r.r.r. ...r.r.... NOON`.. rrnc F �•.�_.1"c,.�..�-.-,'�.��. 2:00 PM ( ri::ee��:(n�"�'��.'•':'.•'.`,i'.�'•'•:�s�ff•'.=pp"��D•"'::Y.✓f!•r.. :U: V..:IS[�',1., 4:00P_M :.....,••77%:.........'256......... !`a'214.` ....i 6:00 PM jKhrr70tgtiyr,:iry 8:00 PM�%180 10:00 PM MIDNIGHT 0% ��78..ay=��:�-�..2..�5...:'�� 97% ::..:.:323 .13T.fs:=:=:� .r....r.,. 96% � -.y�: r1 D':';i�:i%• 62% ., w1�.J . Ia.r..:..30f. 89%. if.Oo-. {6.,;;;,;;,.:;1;,;x;,., 27% •-':�}�� i''v' 0%' 0 ...:.....:.0%'.........<..2,,.:.:.1...::::870,..:....:.r.:r..•.9>::... ::..:..45%:::.::..:.9.::.... •:=::.323..:=....:73:.0:;=:=::-.-.�4: 320.. .,.,. ?�is:•...., :,,.,y:.:: 93. '• 206 ,.�.,r 296 .rr2.63{q.:: ::.,x;.: ; 90 is �l<:':,' :b_''o'Y'':'� 0 0% .b. ':...Q lo.�� ,. ,./.r.r....,.r.r. 85% q^....b,:'.::�.:..,rrr.r.,;:'.i.ii:'.�i : .rJ' .- ), 100% .. ! .[�.. d':',' ,�Q 1. 90% ..............17..............5%...... -7.. 65%12 r %x:•$U?% 55% n , ; 'a......:, ; ::'''s 38% '�?%t;:`;.: �Yo f. -.r,. 0% 0 ?�=.�==r�.�=�=��'= � :�. 1:6.r. ...r... •- "�. 19 �:::;z:'c�....JJ''�[.�.• . r� 4 ..r4 ... I 10 :' , rs: '; 7 . ............................r.`�.+LY�2Kr�::'.%: 0 0% 1... ...U. v..:... :10% ..•.• . 3°ta ..., :,1.3%r. ,.,.. �'}? , .:or x •:�U:. / 8% .Q: ri� ...... . 3%7 ,.r.3'•8�.,-..�r.:: 0% '. 0% 0% 0 .,...: . ..•:..24 :.r........:..•.356 ....31:.....:> ,.r.,. ...,.,., 31.. s,"s,'�;�is;:;a;", 19 2r r r .....• .....12.-... .. ... {:r�:�r7:':,�:�jr2. o.......190........ 0 : ..r.(3.::rrg 0 0 :,. .:.:217:.:.. :.....:....:•148..r.r...... ;''=�6 . .. ,.,.,..,...,,. 367' 7 ...�1.•:J��"a''+:'�`' 244 . ..... 285 ....•3 .. 315 1:l.r�� 97 j ;r:: :: 0 504 ,f:: :,.:. .... x.:287. ... 6.�r::=i:«. 137,., .,.,.,.,. �' r'�'•'.��. C :=%%;r; ;%:: 260 ........ ........: 219 ..` 189 ,23 rrrf, 314,,,,,., 407 O 504 • PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE 368 SPACES PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE 593 SPACES 04:49 PM NOTES: [1] Based on methodologies presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [2] Based on information provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [3] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages from studies by LLG. [4] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [5] Based on parking studies of the Hermosa Beach Pavilion and 24 -Hour Fitness, Santa Monica by LLG. [6] Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Off -Street Parking Municipal Code. [7] Based on a proposed parking supply of 504 spaces. 3z LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Table D WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion LAND USE [3] 24-HOUR FITNESS [4] GENERAL RETAIL [4] GENERAL OFFICE SHARED PARKING DEMAND [7] PARKING SURPLUS OR DEFICIENCY SIZE [2] PARKING RATE 49.40 KSF 6.75 /KSF [5] 5.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] 60.00 KSF 4.00 /KSF [6] GROSS SPACES 333 SPACES 20 SPACES 240 SPACES % TIME OF DAY PEAK #OF % SPACES PEAK #OF % SPACES PEAK #OF SPACES 6:00 AM 0% �� yy�� 8:00 AM 54% . '9 OO AM 50% 10:00 AM 73% NOON 56% n if:i'{�`• . .^ "r" =''3=i� 2:00 PM,,:42%: :rgTT 0( ">:..:cat :. 4:00 PM 57% - ,.5.6.E PM _ �':�� Id - -6:00 PM: "95% 8:00 PM 88% :.;-10:00 PM 57% 2:• MIDNIGHT` :........ .::.0%:.:............1.o.::......:.:.:o00......:.::::.:0:....... 0 0% A�6i 'i=•illi=; �`:;� sv . /o''sc?> 180 18% 167 42 =: - 243 68% 18.6 97%' =,.z= :r` .� . :,:.. ,14097% :.:V"t ::::` 190 87% 7 ° .2�fi . .9 ,b:=,. •316 - 82% 293 87% 190 32% ti.. 0 3% �� ===:�. Ya> �:: 3 63% :.:gi ' i....... 9 q.=: :4=:-:223 13 100% 18 90% r==�'::,. 18, ,.97%: :: . ..i : 17 77% �: F5_ _ _x._47;/0 16 23% -- 17 7% 6 3% - 0% = 7 � ;;;:};i: r1+51 ... 240 216 :i. _ _ 233 185 1 f' -- '55 17 7 .....:0:,::::*:: 7 ;.- 334 .. 98 .... 496 420 .=.s4 ,:,., 391 :: 392 $ ..- .... 387 327 203 =: -;;;M:::::;:::-.1:0504 497 =:4 " 170 j .... 10 ... 8 84 ,,:.: :113 ..;: 112 _f2U _._._. 117" :-.1 177 X 301 ... : .. -..... PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE 497 SPACES PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE 593 SPACES NOTES: [1]Based on methodologies presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [2] Based on information provided by Keisker & Wiggle Architects Inc. [3] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages from studies by LLG. [4] Based on weekday hourly parking accumulation percentages presented in "Shared Parking," ULI-The Urban Land Institute, 1983. [5] Based on parking studies of the Hermosa Beach Pavilion and 24 -Hour Fitness, Santa Monica by LLG. [6] Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Off -Street Parking Municipal Code. [7] Based on a proposed parking supply of 504 spaces. 33 APR -10-01 09.11 FROM.Car ComDevDept 1.11\1SC (• !TT 1_,-\\41 (_;R1' l.rSPAN ENGINEERS ID.3105S749 Table A PROJECT TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON [1] Hermosa Beach Pavillon • .r TM LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS [2] AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (21 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 71 TOTAL VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT Previous Use • AMC Theatre [3] 26,680 GSF 2,134 3 3 6 120 51 171 Retell [4] 27,680 GLSF 1,188 17 11 23 50 54 104 Restaurant(5] 18,500 GSF 2,411 89 82 171 121 80 201, SUBTOTAL 72,860 GSF 5.733 109 96 205 291 185 478 7/99 Project (Expired) Fitness Club [6] 44,476 GSF 1,770 43 28 71 96 64 160 Retail [4] 64.121 GLSF 5,122 75 48 123 225 244 469 8UB 108,597 GSF 6,901 118 76 ... 19e. , 321 308 629 , Proposed LIXe Fitness Club [6] 52,000 GSF 2,080 50 33 83 112 75 187 Retail [4] 5,000 GLSF 215 3 2 5 9 10 19 Office [7]. 65,000 GSF 716 89 12 101 16 — 60 06 SUBTOTAL 12 000 GSF 3 010 142 47 189 137 1;5 02 NET NEW TRIPS (PROPOSED USE (2,723) 33 (49) (16) (153) (20) (174) LESS PREVIOUS USE) u --�• NET NEW TRIPS .�� (PROPOSED USE `(1,891) 24 (29) (5) (184) (143) (327) LESS EXPIRED PROJECT) .- [1) Sources: ITE 'Trip Generation," 6th Edition,1997 end SANDAG 'Vehicular Trafilo Generation Rates," 1993. [2] Trips ere one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3] SANDAG Land Use RECREATION (Thsaters[Multiplex]) trip generation rates. [4) ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) average trip generation rates. [51 ITE Land Use Code 832 (Sit -Down Restaurant) average trip generation rates. [6] SANDAG Lend Use RECREATION (Racquetball/Health Club) hip generation rates. (7] ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) average trip generation rates. 04/10/01 08:23 34 - PACE 2 RECEIVED APR 10 2001 COM. DEV. DEPT. TX/RX NO.0777 P.002 s APR -10-01 08.11 FROM.Carso 28 -Mar 2001 mDevDepL ID:3108 Table B TRIP GENERATION RATES [1] Hermosa Beach Pavilion • 48 PACE CODE SANDAG OR ITE LAND USE TRIP RATE AND PERCENTAGE DAILY 12] TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR [2J PM PEAK HOUR121 TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT RECREATION Theeters[Multiplex] 80.00 0.24 50% 50% 6A0 70% 30% 820 Shopping Center 4292 1.03 61% 38% 3.74 48% 52% 832 Sit -Down Restaurant 130.34 9.27 52% 48% 10.86 60% 40% RECREATION Racquetball/Health Club 40.00 1.60 80% 40% 3.60 60% 40% 710 General Office Building 11.01 1.56 88% 12% 1.49 17% 83% [1] Sources: ffE "Trip Generation," 6th Edition, 1997 and SANDAG "Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates. 1993. 12] DAY, AM, and PM peak tour totals aro trips per 1,000 SP. 04/10/01 08:23 35 RECEIVE® APR 10 zoos , COM. DEV. DcpT It TX/RX NO.0777 P.003 Mayor and Members of the City Council L— c //61 July 5, 2001 City Council Meeting July 10, 2001 INITIATIVE PETITION TO REPEAL CERTAIN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS TO ELIMINATE HERMOSA BEACH UTILITY USERS TAX Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Receive and file the attached report that Council ordered pursuant to Elections Code Section 9212 analyzing the fiscal impact of the proposed ordinance; and 2) Select one of the following alternatives: (a) Introduce the ordinance without alteration (and adopt it within 10 days); or (b) Direct the City Clerk to prepare the documents required to submit the ordinance, without alteration, to the voters at the next regular municipal election occurring November 6, 2001. Background: At its meeting of June 12, 2001, the City Clerk presented to Council a Certificate of Sufficiency for the subject initiative ordinance, stating that the petition contained valid signatures from more than 5 percent of the Hermosa Beach votes cast for all candidates for governor at the November 3, 1998 gubernatorial election and has, therefore, qualified for the November 6, 2001 ballot. The Council was presented with the alternatives mandated by State law to either: (a) introduce the ordinance and adopt it within 10 days; (b) direct that the measure be submitted to the voters at the next municipal election; or (c) order a report pursuant to Elections Code Section 9212, to be presented to the Council within 30 days. At that meeting, the Council opted to order a report, to be presented at the July 10 meeting, thereby deferring action on the petition until that date. Staff was directed to report on the fiscal impact of the proposed ordinance. That report is attached. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES: Option 2(a) – Introduce the Ordinance If the City Council opts for Alternative 2(a)—to introduce the ordinance without alteration at tonight's meeting—the item would not be placed on the ballot. Because State law requires the subsequent adoption of the ordinance to take place within 10 days, it would be necessary to adjourn tonight's meeting to a date no later than Thursday, July 19, 2001, in order to adopt the ordinance within the State -mandated time limit. 1 Option 2(b) — Direct the Measure be Placed on the November 6, 2001 Ballot If the City Council opts for Alternative 2(b)—to direct the City Clerk to prepare the required documents to submit the ordinance without alteration to a vote of the people at the regular municipal election of November 6, 2001—the City Clerk would prepare all appropriate resolutions and associated documents for approval and adoption by the Council at its July 24, 2001 meeting, which is the last regular Council meeting before the County deadline for placing measures on the November ballot. Noted: Step urrell, City Manager A. Elaine Doerfling, City Cler Attachments: Report from City Manager Steve Burrell dated July 5, 2001 Proposed ordinance identified as Exhibit "A" 2 2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED MEASURE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTIONS 3.36.040, 3.36.050, 3.36.060, 3.36.070 AND 3.36.080 OF CHAPTER 3.36 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITIZENS' INITIATIVE ACT TO REPEAL THE UTILITY USERS TAX ON TELEPHONE, ELECTRICITY, GAS, WATER, AND CABLE TELEVISION The people of the City of Hermosa Beach do ordain as follows: SECTION L Title. This Act shall be known as and may be cited as the "Citizens' Initiative Act to Repeal the Utility Users Tax on Telephone, Electricity, Gas, Water, and Cable Television." SECTION II. Findings and Declarations. The people of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby find and declare all of the following: 1. The costs of electricity, gas and water, already high in Southern California, are escalating. 2. A 6 % utility users tax was imposed by a City Council vote in 1985.. It was to "sunset," or expire, after three years but in 1986 the City Council deleted the sunset clause, and the tax still remains in effect. 3. Despite generous pay raises to police, fire and other City personnel, despite record purchases of new cars and trucks, and despite the costs of a major, ongoing, remodel of City Hall, the City of Hermosa Beach has had budget surpluses of $1 million or more in each of its last three fiscal years. As a result, as of January 2001 the City had $20 million in bonds and other interest -yielding accounts - up more than 50% from two years ago. 4. Repealing the 6% utility users tax will benefit residents and help Hermosa's businesses to compete fairly with those in other cities that have no utility tax. 5. Should the revenue stream from this tax again be needed in the future, a new utility users tax may be instituted by a simple majority vote of the electorate. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION III. Purpose and Intent. The people of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby declare their purpose and intent in enacting this Act to be as follows: To reduce taxation in order to help to offset the soaring cost of utilities. SECTION IV. Municipal Code Amendment. Sections 3.36.040 through 3.36.080, entitled "Telephone Tax," "Electricity Tax," "Gas Tax," "Water Tax," and "Cable Television Tax," of Chapter 3.36 of Title 3 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, are hereby repealed in their entirety. SECTION V. Liberal Construction. The provisions of this Act shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose of providing tax relief. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Act, or part thereof, or the application thereof to any person, property or circumstances, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end the provisions of the Act are severable. r July 5, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 REPORT REGARDING THE IMPACT OF REPEALING THE 6% UTILITY USER TAX ON CITY SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND VISITORS PREPARED PURSUANT TO ELECTION CODE SECTION 9212 PURPOSE This report is intended to show the impact of repealing the 6% utility user tax on City services provided to residents, businesses and visitors. This report has been prepared pursuant to City Council direction in accordance with Section 9212 of the Election Code. BACKGROUND The City has had a utility user tax since 1985. The tax is expected to generate $1,822,004 during the 2001-2002 fiscal year. This represents 12% of the City's total General Fund revenue of $15,417,726. The funds have been used primarily for police protection and sewer reconstruction and maintenance. A transfer of $700,000 is made to the sewer fund for reconstruction and maintenance projects and $400,000 is transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for street repairs. I have attached several charts that show where the City's revenue comes from and where it is spent. The charts show that the largest expenditure from the General Fund is for the Police and Fire Departments, which make up about 60% of the General Fund budget or a total $9,700,000. The largest source of revenue for the General Fund is property taxes, which is expected to total $4,596,606. for the fiscal year. Sales taxes are the second largest at $2,796,603. and the UUT is third at $1,822,002. Sales taxes have increased due to several factors including auto sales. It appears that one or two of the auto dealers will be leaving the City when their new locations are finished. The loss of one or two of the auto dealers will also have significant impact on the general fund. The remaining General Fund revenue comes from a number of other taxes and fees for services. Many of these other sources have grown in the last few years primarily as the result of an improved economy and new building. The hotel tax has increased as the result of a new hotel and increased usage at existing properties. This source is expected to total $1,013,454. Fees collected for building permits has increased significantly as a result of the mini building boom that continues in the City and the South Bay in general. Together, these increases have partially offset the funds taken by the state in the early 1990's. The elimination of the utility user tax revenue would cause a significant reduction in services provided by the City. If the repeal of the utility user tax is approved, the tax would no longer be collected as of December 31, 2001. The most practical way to reduce the City's expenditures in order to offset the $1,822,004. in lost revenue is to reduce ongoing operational costs. Personnel costs make up 56% of General Fund expenditures. The remaining 44% are allocated for contract services, operating expenses and the City's Capital Improvement program. It would be virtually impossible to achieve the cost saving necessary without reducing staffing in all departments. It will take a workforce reduction of 24% of the total of City employees to achieve the cost savings necessary to balance the budget without the UUT revenue. There also would be reductions in or elimination of activities and expenditures in several areas where we use private contractors, such as street sweeping, park maintenance, crossing guards, NPDES reporting and building maintenance. These types of reductions would have a significant impact on the services received by our residents, businesses and visitors and the City's ability to comply with state and federal mandates. In the event that the voters repeal the tax, the task of the City Council would be to enact a series of reductions in expenditures to make up for the loss of the revenue. In developing possible recommendations, the following realities were considered. It would not be possible to leave public safety out of the cuts and still have much of an operation. If Police and Fire were held harmless, the total number of non -safety reductions would be over 46% of the non -safety workforce. I do not believe that we could function as a full service city at that point. Two departments generate revenue, Community Development and Community Resources, and although some cuts would be recommended in these departments, additional cuts would not be recommended as we would lose the revenue that goes along with the services provided. There was no consideration given to wage reduction as a way to close the gap. Frankly, it would have to reach around 16-18% in order to make up enough to balance the budget. A reduction of that size is not a realistic option in this labor market. The following is a list of changes that would be recommended to reduce expenditures to achieve a balanced budget. This has been developed in an honest attempt to explain the impact of the repeal of the tax and the impact that it would have on the services provided. • The Capital Improvement Program would be reduced to grant funding. The street repair program on residential streets would be eliminated. The $400,000 of general fund revenues committed to this effort would have to be eliminated or much deeper cuts in other areas would have to be made. • The Police Department sworn police personnel would be reduced to the minimum deployment necessary to staff each shift with patrol officers and maintain the detective division. This level of staffing would virtually eliminate specialty assignments, including the motor/traffic division, additional downtown enforcement, specialized traffic enforcement in neighborhoods and at schools and reduce our ability to staff special events. r • The Fire Department is presently staffed with 18 sworn shift personnel, Assistant Fire Chief and the Fire Chief with 6 firefighter/paramedics working each shift. If a reduction were made to 5 firefighter/paramedics per shift, we would no longer be able to gaff the second response engine. This second engine provides a first response when a second call for service is received. In addition, the inability to use the second engine has an impact on the automatic aid agreements the City has with our neighboring communities. • The reductions in the Public Works Department would significantly impact the Maintenance Division, providing only sewer maintenance and critical repairs on other facilities. If the tax is repealed, a major effort would need to be undertaken to reduce the City's responsibilities in terms of maintaining facilities. We simply would be an in mode of attempting to keep things safe. • In the Community Resources Department, staffing would be reduced somewhat or the fees raised to the point where there is no subsidy by the general fund. The special programs, special events, coordination and assistance provided to non -profits would have to be cut back. • In the Community Development Department, even though most department operations are covered by fees, the general fund portion of operations would have to be reduced. The code enforcement effort would be reduced as it is not covered by fees. • Additional staffing reductions would be proposed in the Finance Department and Administrative offices, which includes the City Manager, City Clerk and Personnel Department. The overall reduction would be approximately 33 positions out of 137 positions. I have also attached some information concerning the history of the Utility Users Tax that you might find helpful as the issue is discussed. Respectfully submitted, Schen Burrell City Manager • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH UTILITY USER TAX FACT SHEET HISTORY The utility user tax was implemented 10/1/85 at an initial rate of 6% until 7/1/86. The rate was to change to 5% from 7/1/86 and sunset 10/1/88. On 6/29/86 the sunset clause was deleted and the rate was left permanently at 6%. Funds raised were to be earmarked for sewer maintenance, downtown police foot patrol and bootleg enforcement. The tax applied to intrastate telephone services, electricity, gas, water and cable television services. On 11/3/87, a ballot measure raised the rate from 6% to 10%. The impartial analysis of the measure indicated that the practice of the City Council had been to allocate the tax for police protection and sewer replacement and that if adopted, the tax increase could be designated by the City Council for the purchase of open space or parkland. A subsequent ballot measure on 6R/88 required that the 4% portion of the tax be used only for the purchase of railroad right-of-way property. The 4% portion of the tax was terminated by the City Council on 11/14/95, when it was no longer needed for the purchase of the property. On 7/11/95, the telephone portion of the tax was changed to include interstate and intemational communication services. The collection of this portion of the tax was ceased on 11/1/98 since the imposition of the tax was not placed before the voters as required by Proposition 218. REVENUE Below is a history of the 6% portion of the tax. UTILITY USER TAX 1988-2001 ThoJsalos 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Prepared by the Finance Department • The marked increase shown in 1995 is due to taxation of interstate and international telephone services, with a decline in 1998 when collection of that portion of the tax ceased. The utility user tax represents 12% of General Fund revenue for 2001-02 as shown below. ENERAL FUND - WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM AVERAGE TAX PER HOUSEHOLD The City receives utility user tax monthly from the companies providing the service to residents. No detailed information is received on a per -customer basis; only total amounts are provided to the City. In order to determine the average tax paid per household, amounts were extrapolated, using the amount of utility user tax paid in 1999-2000 and the January 2000 household number of 9,813, which is the most recent number provided by the State. Based on above calculations, the average tax per household is approximately $15 per month. Prepared by the Finance Department DISTRIBUTION OF TAX BY INDUSTRY The distribution of the tax, according to industry, is shown below. EFFECT OF ENERGY CRISIS ON TAX REVENUE Based on the most recent utility user tax information, which is May 2001, overall tax receipts are up 12%. The chart below shows the increase or decrease by industry. At this time, there is no windfall from the electricity crisis, as shown by the 2% decline in the tax amount from electricity. Receipts from the UUT on gas have increased 83%, however, because the portion of the UUT generated by gas is only 10.2%, the amount is not as significant. In the 2001-02 Budget, the City budgeted an additional $100,000 ($50,000 in the General Fund) for increased utility expenses, based on estimates from Southern California Edison (SCE). This equates to a 25% increase. SCE estimates that approximately 50% of Hermosa Beach residents will experience an increase of 8- 10% on their electric bills, based on past usage. Prepared by the Finance Department f • OJTILITY USER TAX • May 2001 YTD vs. May 2000 YTD Thousands 700 600 500 400 300 -2% -3% 200 100 0 Cable +83% +8% +5% HOW THE TAX IS SPENT Electric Gas Telephone Water SOMay 01 DMay 00 Estimated revenue for 2001-02 is approximately $1,800,000. Of that, $700,000 is transferred to the Sewer Fund for maintenance and rehabilitation of sewer lines. $100,000 is transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund, which is currently used primarily for street repairs. The remaining $1,000,000 stays in the General Fund to pay for police costs, which total $6,600,000 in the 2001-02 budget and represent 40.1% of the total. ENERAL FUND - WHERE THE MONEY IS SPENT Prepared by the Finance Department July 5, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 i BALLOT MEASURES - FUNDING FOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Objective: To provide information for the City Council to consider to determine whether or not a ballot measure will be placed on the No /ember 6, 2001 ballot. Background: / The City Council, at its meeting of June 12, 2001, directed staff to return with ballot measures to provide funding for the Chamber of Commerce. Two separate ballot 'measures are attached for your review. One of the measures increases the business license tax by 10% and would be a "general tax" as defined in Article XIIID of the California Constitution and revenues from the tax may be used for any municipal purpose. This requires the City Council to place this on the ballot by a 4/5 vote. The City Council could then provide funding to the Chamber of Commerce under agreement to provide services to the City. The City Council could enter into such a contract now without placing this measure on the ballot. The ballot measure simply increases the business license tax by 10%. There is no guaranteed funding to the Chamber of Commerce as it is dependant on the City and Chamber of Commerce reaching an agreement for services. The second measure also increases the business license tax by 10%. The measure is defined as a "special tax" as defined in Article XIIID of the California Constitution and revenues from the increase would be used to support the activities of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce subject to a contract with the City. In the event that they are unable to agree on the terms of a contract in any given year, then the funds could be used for any municipal purpose. The "special tax" requires a majority vote to be placed on the ballot and a 2/3 approval of the voters. The business license tax is expected to generate $600,000 in 2001-02 Fiscal Year. This would result in $60,000 per year for the Chamber of Commerce. Other options for funding The City Council could consider other options if it wished. It would be possible to have a purely advisory measure on the ballot asking the voters whether or not the City should work with the Chamber of Commerce to develop a stable funding source in lieu of the Fiestas that has been its mainstay over the years. This could be considered in conjunction with dropping one of the 3 -day events and substituting this alternative revenue source. A business assessment process could be explored which would be similar to forming a Business Improvement District that could provide direct funding from the business community to the Chamber of Commerce. The City would serve as the collecting agent in this type of set up. This process could be initiated by the Chamber of Commerce with some assistance from the City. Recommendation: That the City Council review and consider the several options. Staff needs to prepare any potential ballot measures for final review and adoption at the July 24, 2001 City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager • • AN ORDINANCE INCREASING THE CITY BUSINESS TAX BY TEN PERCENT The People of the City of Hermosa Beach do ordain as follows: Section 1. Title 5, Chapter 5.04 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new Section 5.04.350 to read as follows: "Section 5.04.350 Increase in Business Tax. The amount of the business tax for each classification of business subject to taxation by this Chapter shall be 110% of the amounts set forth in Section 5.04.200 of this Code." Section 2. The tax approved by this Ordinance shall be a general tax as defined in Article XIIID of the California Constitution the revenues from which may be used for any municipal purpose. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be placed on the ballot by a two-thirds vote of the City Council and shall be adopted by a majority vote of those voting on the measure at the November, 2001 general municipal election. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. • AN ORDINANCE INCREASING THE CITY BUSINESS TAX BY TEN PERCENT TO SUPPORT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE The People of the City of Hermosa Beach do ordain as follows: Section 1. Title 5, Chapter 5.04 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new Section 5.04.350 to read as follows: "Section 5.04.350 Increase in Business Tax to Support Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce. The amount of the business tax for each classification of business subject to taxation by this Chapter shall be 110% of the amounts set forth in Section 5.04.200 of this Code. The incremental revenues from this ten percent (10%) tax increase shall be used to support the activities of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce as are approved and provided for in a contract entered into annually between the Chamber and the City. In the event the Chamber and the City are unable to agree on the terms of such a contract in any given year, the revenues may be used for any municipal purpose. Section 2. The tax approved by this Ordinance shall be a special tax as defined in Article XIIID of the California Constitution. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be placed on the ballot by a majority vote of the City Council and shall be adopted by a two-thirds vote of those voting on the measure at the November, 2001 general municipal election. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. July 3, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE & ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE Background: As you know, the League of California Cities takes positions on legislation at the state level that impact cities. The position that the League of California Cities takes on various bills starts at the annual business meeting where resolutions are considered. These resolutions guide the legislative effort during the next year. In order for the City to participate in the vote, we must designate the voting delegate and an alternate. Recommendation: Designate a voting delegate and an alternate for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting on Saturday, September 15, 2001. Respec submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager ��V�►DED 1896. Mill7N1111 League of California Cities Better Cities—A Better Life June 2001 • • ea! e of California Cities To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: David Fleming, League President, Mayor, Vacaville Re: Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference 1400 K Street Sacramento, CA 95814 916.658.8200 FAX 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, September 12 through Saturday, September 15, 2001 in Sacramento, CA. One very important aspect of the annual conference is the annual business meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that all cities be represented at the annual business meeting on Saturday, September 15, 2001, at 9:15 a.m. at the Sacramento Convention Center. League bylaws state that "Any official of a Member City may, with the approval of the city council, be designated the city's designated voting delegate or alternate delegate to any League meeting. Designated voting delegates (or their alternates) registered to attend the Annual Conference constitute the League's General Assembly." To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each city council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be registered at the conference and present at the annual business meeting. League bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal. or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the city council on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." Please complete and return the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form" to the Sacramento office of the League at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday, August 17, 2001), so that proper records may be established for the conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the designated Voting Card desk located in the League registration area. The voting procedures to be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of this memo. Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 658-8236. League of California Cities Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. To cast the city's vote a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 3. Prior to the annual conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League for use by the Credentials Committee. 4. The voting delegate or alternate may pick up the city's voting card at the annual conference registration area. 5. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate is permitted. 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the annual business meeting, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the annual business meeting, exchanges may be made at the annual conference registration area. At the annual business meeting, exchanges may be made at the voting card table located in the front of the meeting room. Exchanges may not be made while a roll call vote is in progress because the Credentials Committee will be conducting the roll call. 7. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Only the signatures of city officials, who, according to the records of the Credentials Committee, are authorized to use the city's voting card and who have left a sample of their signature on the Credentials Committee register will be approved. 8. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city official to vote at the annual business meeting. G:\policy\acres\voteprox.doc 7;L' D/ 6l Sa..7/1 0/0/ - July 3, 2001 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL July 10, 2001 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #25968 (C.U.P. CON NO. 00-11, PDP NO. 00-13) LOCATION: 649 AND 651 5TH STREET APPLICANT(S): KOMICK BOURGEOIS, LLC REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #25968 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25968 at their June 20, 2000 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blume feld Director Communit Development Department Step =' R. urrell Cit anager Z Respectfully submitted, e obertson Associate Planner y/Gfin649 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25968 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 649 AND 651 5TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on July 10, 2001 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 00-40 adopted after hearing on June 20, 2000; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #25968 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 36, Dr. Dougherty's Hermosa Bay View Tracct, as recorded in Book 10, Page(s) 140 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 649 and 651 5th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2001. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California Al LEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f'rm649rs (QJ440/-615/ 2//01' July 3, 2001 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL July 10, 2001 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #25869 (C.U.P. CON NO. 00-1, PDP NO. 00-1) LOCATION: 1141 - 1145 CYPRESS AVENUE APPLICANT(S): CARAS HOMES INC. REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #25869 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25869 at their February 15, 2000 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 2n Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blumenf; ld, 'rector Community evelopment Department Stephen City Ma ger 2 Respect ly sub en Ro Associate Planner y/f fm1141 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25869 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1141 - 1145 CYPRESS AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on July 10, 2001 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 00-9 adopted after hearing on February 15, 2000; E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #25869 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 22, Tract No. 780, as recorded in Book 16, Page(s) 41 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1141 - 1145 Cypress Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2001. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California Al LEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY ffm1141rs I PARCEL 4,325 S.F. PARCEL VAP \O. 25968 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 36, DR. DOUGHERTY'S HERMOSA BAY VIEW TRACT, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 10, PAGE 140 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING 9F ),AID,,DAAP AND SUBDIVISION. KIM KOMICK SUBDIVIDER LLG, RECORD OWNER: KOMICK BOURGEOIS,nA CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ON Dec . I v -Z Pan BEFORE ME, cRiEs.``(1. L1. V:Poe.tril, A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED ` & 1.1 IC.jS. a - SS. PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND' THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR tHE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. D NOTARY P '' IC IN AND FOR SAI ATE NAME: HERM- .A A. y MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES _q_)ig 450, x au rxbrA . ¢` .,1N. +iH . <r:.� •r �.1r =�1F .—.,e..—J +ti al 3 T Or It.Z BOARD 07 $tritERviso EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. • iI ! z 5 B V". (y/,, -3o) No. 11284 EXP. 12-31-04 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS ECEWE JUN 2 6 2001 COM. DEV, DEPT. ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF KIM KOMICK ON 8-30-00 I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. EDWARD G. SHWE RI R.C.E. 11284 EXPIRATION: 12-31-04 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM DR. DOUGHERTY'S HERMOSA BAY VIEW TRACT, ti Io -140, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF: THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED O� WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. JAM.E5 A. NOYE5 CITY ENGINEER uz) I j'S/oI DEPUTY R.C.E. 0202 73 EXPIRES 9-30-o/ DATE CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20 APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 200 SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE SCALE: I"=10' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PACFI_ VAP \OD 25968 * DR DOUGHERTY'S HERMOSA BAY VIEW TRAGI M.B. 10-140 E'LY LINE OF LOT 37 * IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 40.00' a a s INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP S'LY LINE OF P M. No. 2011,2 P.M.22 222.2V N 76°34'00" E 0 S 13°26'00" E I 6 • 4,325 S.F. • • 0 • w S 13°26'00" W'LY LINE OF LOT 35 0 N 0 0 N 76°34'00" E N 76°34'00" E 40.00' 5TH STREET 0 N 0 F— 0 U U lam. U 0_ FD LST PER TR NO. 41915 M.B. 1006-54-55. FD L&T PER TR NO. 41915 M.B. 1006-54-55. • I PARCEL 4,000 S.F. PARCEL VAP \O. 25869 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 22 OF TRACT N\O. 780 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 41 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND I,LING OAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. CHRIS CARAS SUBDIVIDER RECORD OWNER: CARAS HOMES INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) I ON r U 1, T .313 20040 PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, C-i'I'`tt. . _V%R.? A NOTARY Cly RIS C g PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURES) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. NOTARY PU``i C IN AND FOR SAID 3 `%TE .V` NAME: G i}C R.'( L _A. v.A.gjtro MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 41--%$-0 I G /fD( EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN, FOR WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. IZAAroviAt_w;-.7 No. 11284 EXP. 12-31-04 SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS ;vF. JUN 2 6 21101 COM. DEV DEPT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF CHRIS CARAS ON 05-15-00 I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. EDWARD G. SHWEIRI R.C.E. 11284 EXPIRATION: 12-31 -04 RECORD DATA WAS TAKEN FROM TRACT NO. 780, M.B. 16-41 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE • CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE of I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. J,ME.5 A• NoYEj CITY ENGINEER DEPUTY R.C.E. OZ OZ73 EXPIRES 9 -3o -al 0-6 (.411/01 COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER r COUNTY ENGINEER BY DEPUTY DATE RCE NO. . EXPIRES CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF , 20__ APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 200_ SECRETARY OF PLANNING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE a. SCALE: I =20 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS PACFI_ VAP \OD 25869 �E TRACT NO. 780 M. B. 16-41 �E PM NO. 21325 P. M. B. 235-66 alk IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES W 'LY LINE OF LOT 22 s s s INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP PIER AVENUE 8 0 0 0 0 N FD SPK PER SHE 0 S'LY LINE OF LOT 21 XE N 77°10'00'1E 100.00' • • • • i a * 4,000 SQ FT e a a • a N 77° 10'00"E \I00.00' N'LY LINE OF LOT 23 8 0 0 0 N 0 N Z 20' ' 20' FD PK SPK PER .ESE I I TH STREET 4 0' N 12°52'00"W 20' LU z LU (r) LL 0 4 0' 20' U