Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/10/88"To escape criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing." -Elbert Hubbard AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 10, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Etta Simpson MAYOR PRO TEM Jim Rosenberger COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon June Williams CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: 1(4 ll , PROCLAMATIONS: 4 Correct rect Posture Mon y ay, 1988 /8 /91 TT'��CITI ZEN COMME S (2 3 ot1. 54f:'1/ ` "w-‘44., Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar or within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are request- ed to submit those comments to the City Manager. ..r 1. (a) CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) Recommendation to approve minutes as follows: 1) Adjourned meeting of the City Council for workshop with Planning Commission held on April 7, 1988. 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on April 26, 1988. 1 (b) Recommendation to approve Noe. through Recommendation to receive reports for March, 1988. 1) Expenditure Report 2) Revenue Report 3) Treasurer's Report Recommendation to receive and file oat Sent t-- Sent Report for April, 1988. Iemor um from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 4, 198,3. (f) Recommendation to award contract fir a tenance to Specialty Maintenance aft . payor to sign, and authorize staff to issue necessary within budget limitations.a or u from Public Works Director Anthony Antic: dates Apra l' 21 1988. ) Recsomaendation to receive d file ,s us � rt of en- r croachment permits. memorandum trainrks Direc- tor Anthony Antich dated May 3, 1988. re. placement of a Kiosk at Hermosa Pier beset. Memoran- dum from City; Manager Kevin B. Northoraft dated May 4, 1988. (i) Recommendation to receive and file r d update on the recent oil spill from the ab e t perties. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve iisniewski dated May 2, 1988. Recommendation to appropriate $7, 000 fr rr sp+ tive Expenditures into City Manager t + feo sional Services cost to reconcile grants. Memorandum from community ces D .rector Alana Mastrian dated May 3, 1988- (k) Recommendation to approve a,contract `C atract- ing for bicycle path repairs (CTP 165 uthorize Mayor to sign authorize staff to issue .. .a its necessar :, and to ;transfer - 3 43.2 fr a1: +tnd des gnat on for Capital 1 s rov+ mente to CIP 165. Memorandum from Public Works Director Ant "Mich dated April 28, 1988. (1) Recommendation to accept murk as ao lee >or Kelly Ten nis Court resurfacing (CiP 87-5107) aeat� ra; staff to release the 10% retention payor t `to R .o ate' aino; release Faithful PerformaMoe Bond anal (m) (n) (o) (p) Materials Bond; and file Notice of Completion.. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 2, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file the Child Abuse Monthly Report. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated May 3, 1988. Recommendation to deny claim and refer to City's Claims Administrator the claim of: 1) Joseph Casanova, represented by Carl M. Hovland, Esq., 1650 So. Pacific Coast Hwy., Suite 200, Re- dondo Beach, CA 90277, filed April 25, 1988. Recommendation to approve cancellation of Warrants Nos. 025694, 025569, 025795 and 026109. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 2, 1988. Recommendation to approve entering into a contract for concrete street repair (CIP 85-160) with Ruiz Engineer- ing Co. in the amount of $33,416; authorize Mayor to sign; and authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 28, 1988. Recommendation to approve procedures for handling assets which are seized and forfeited by Police Department. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated April 27, 1988. ***************************************************************** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ****************************.************************************* 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-924 - AN ORDINANCE FOR TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING PROJECTIONS INTO REQUIRED YARD AREAS. For waiver of further reading and adoption. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 88-925 - AN ORDINANCE CHANGING VIOLATIONS FROM MISDEMEANORS TO INFRACTIONS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ENFORCEMENT CAPABILITIES. For waiver of further reading and adoption. (c) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE I, "ADMINISTRA- TION" SECTION 2-3 AND CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IIA,"DIRECTOR OF FINANCE", SECTION 2-22.4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING THE METHOD OF FIXING THE AMOUNT OF BOND FOR THE CITY CLE TY, TREASURER, AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated April 28, 1988. (d) A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE PENAL AMOUNT OF BOND RE- QUIRED FOR THE CITY CLERK, CITY TREASURER, AND DIRECTO OF FINANCE. For adoption. Memorandum from Risk Manage Robert Blackwood dated April 28, 1988. W -GP A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #44937 FOR A 10 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 829 -.833 FIFTH STREET. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach date May 3, 1988. (g) (h) RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO HAVE PLANNING STAFF AND COMMIS- SION STUDY THE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF AN R -1A ZONE. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 3, 1988. (i) RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO DIRECT PLANNING COMMISSION AND KI STAFF TO STUDY AMENDING OR REPEALING THE BILTMORE SITE`- SPECIFIC PLAN. For adoption. Memorandum from City CLerk,IKathleen Mi t•. e dated May 3, 1988. /Po (j) A RESOLUTION TO '•• ••L FOR THE SAFE CONDUCT OF VEHICULAR PURSUITS BY PEACE OFFICERS. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated May 4 1988. 4 RESOLUTION APPROVING'_ THE MERGER OF 1276 9TH STREE INTO TWO PARCELS WHICH CONFORM TO THE ZONING ORDIN For adoption. (Continued from 4/26 meeting.) memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 4, 1988. ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREAS 2A, 2B AND 2C TO R-1. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach date• May `3, 1988. ge (k) A RESOLUTION TO ADD PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT TO MASTER AGE- MENT NO. 07,-5155 BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 2, 1988. (1) RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO DIRECT 'PLANNING COMMISSION AND C - STAFF TO LOOK AT WAYS TO ALLOW 30 FT. HEIGHT IF VIEW BLOCKAGE OCCURS IN AREAS SUBJECT TO REZONING. Memoran dum from Planning Director Michael c ub ch ated May 3 1988. 3 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR BE TE DISCUSSION. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM`TEE PUBLIC. PUBLIC HEARINGS TO COMMENCE AT"8:00-P.M. 5. it 401/ l / APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO NOT MERGE LOTS %! LOCATED AT 1214 10THSTREET AND 1233 21ST STREET (WITH PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR 1214 10TH STREET). (Con- tinued from April 26, 1988 meeting,) Memorandum from City Attorney James • • u• h d d = y, 2, 14s A PEAL FROM DECISI OF THE P G Cth MISSION ' O'DENY A A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 6' WALL ALONG THE SIDEYARD OF A CORNER LOT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE (WITH PROPOSED RESOLUTION). Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated May 3, 198:.M/ -- Jr= ,rier°7:* C5r e. 3 � MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. 11/ A PROPOSED EM``•GENC ORDINANCE ADDING CHA4Ao 44' - .,, ...,, ‘7;0 PTER 14 - HAZ-a - ✓ARDOUS MATERIALS TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. Memorandum from Public Safes D'rector dated April 28, 1988. 10 lfai (a) 12. Requests (a) (b) INFORMATIONAL RE FIRE FLOW ISSUE..f Steve W'. , ' ewsl�t5 C;ol. ORT AND UPDAT ` ON THE FIRE- HY Memorandum from Public et d t d May 4, 198 a PROPOS RESOLUTION ESTABLIS • LIN PROCEDURE. Memorandum from Planning Director Schubach dated May 3, 1988. H N A ,fes• D` Itw7 ' r.. � ' D ' ectorit ' 5 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY; MAN ER ichael, Recommendation to accept proposal from::: "�•=�= for appraisal of the Biltmore Site. Memorandum City � ager Kevin B. Northcraft dated May 5, 1988. M SC LLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL Status report re. railroad right-of-way. (Reserved agenda in case there is new information to report.)' OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Request by Councilmember Rosenberger and Mayor Simpson for consideration of City policy on minimum lot size for esiden i"1 • sow e b the City a Recommended A.tion: 1) ote by Council wheth `%to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. Consideration of future ballot' issues: 1) Implementing 1980 Measure EE, requested b Ma or Simpson; om -4, �a ��3 • • • 2) Process lot mergers pursuant to state law, requested by Councilmember Creighton. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. ADJOURNMENT CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH'THURSDAY' OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people` pe sn. . OSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative gone: nt. You government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule iv0104 by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time, allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a city Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. I'his Council. is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrows challenges today. Adopted by city council on October 23, 1986 TW -6,464/ "` 8 NOTE: ere is no smdcin allowed 1 owe din the Council Cha�bers J ti THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The' Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior • to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt,•reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on'the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Tony Antich, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Improvements CIP 85-138 DATE: 5-10-88 FROM: Debbie Murphy t 1 isst . Engineer In summary, the scope of work for the subject project is as follows: 1) Street Lighting Work only is to be performed at the following location: Pier Avenue and Valley Drive/Ardmore Avenue. New luminaires will be installed; pavement markings will be repainted and stop signs replaced. There will be no traffic signal installed at this location. 2) Traffic Signal Upgrade is to be performed at the following locations: Hermosa Avenue and 2nd Street Hermosa Avenue and llth Street Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue This upgrade consists of the following, at one or more of the above locations: replacing the existing controllers; replacing or upgrading the signal heads and backplates; installing new mast arms, wiring, loops, adding left turn phasing, luminaires, new street name signs and miscellaneous hardware to bring existing traffic signals up to currrent standards. May 10, 1988 MAYOR - AFTER PROCLAMATIONS, PLEASE ANNOUNCE THAT THIS MEETING WILL BE ADJOURNED TO 7 P.M., MAY 19, TO CONDUCT A STUDY SESSION ON UPDATING THE CITY GOALS. THAT THE SCHEDULED BUDGET MEETING ON MAY 23 MAY NEED TO BE RESCHEDULED. IF SO, SUGGEST THE PLANNED MAY 26 BUDGET SESSION START AT 6:00 P.M., WITH TUESDAY, MAY 31 BEING A \\\-___. SECOND DATE IF WE DO NOT FINISH. ALSO, PLEASE ANNOUNCE (OR INTRODUCE BOB BLACKWOOD) THAT A CITIZEN SURVEY ON CITY HALL HOURS AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. Maximum Height HEIGHT HEASURE)IENT CURRENT !METHOD VIEW AvAMaximum Height AVERAGE GRADE METHOD STREET VIEW 30' May 10, 1988 MAYOR - AFTER PROCLAMATIONS, PLEASE ANNOUNCE THAT THIS MEETING WILL BE ADJOURNED TO 7 P.M., MAY 19, TO CONDUCT A STUDY SESSION ON UPDATING THE CITY GOALS. THAT THE SCHEDULED BUDGET MEETING ON MAY 23 MAY NEED TO BE RESCHEDULED. IF SO, SUGGEST THE PLANNED MAY 26 BUDGET SESSION START AT 6:00 P.M., WITH TUESDAY, MAY 31 BEING A SECOND DATE IF WE DO NOT FINISH. ALSO, PLEASE ANNOUNCE (OR INTRODUCE BOB BLACKWOOD) THAT A CITIZEN SURVEY ON CITY HALL HOURS AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. 1 MOP RO" j •97-e91711- "'VI" 6,1 /7141: • e9-74 ./rre-e' MLNUTE$_OF_.THE, AD4OURNEQ JMEETINQ _OFTUE. CITTCOUNCAof the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Thursday, April 7, 1988 at the hour of 7:04 P.M. for the purpose of having a Workshop Session with the Planning Commission. RQLL_ CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Present: Compton, Ingell, Peirce, Rue Absent: DeBellis Also Present: City Manager Northeraft, Planning Director Schubach, and City Clerk Midstokke Mayor Simpson called the meeting to order to a Committee of the Whole. She requested that everyone try to limit their comments on items to five minutes, and try to conclude around 9:30 P.M. Planning Chairman Compton stated some reasons for tonight's meeting: Is Commission moving in the right direction for Council, trying to save staff time, to find common ground on each of the items on the agenda, positioning, and establishing priority on the items. COMMTSSION..ITEMS Priority 1 1. Open space for small R-1 lots - this item has already been dealt with in that the Planning Commission has sent a Resolution to the City Council, and they have introduced an Ordinance on this subject. 2. 17' Setback (off alleys and small alleys) - small lots are highly impacted. Councilmember Creighton stated he" would be willing to study this item if staff provided a number of how many lots, and how this would apply. Councilmember Sheldon does not feel we should be mandating a 17' Setback, but rather require 4 parking spaces. Councimember Williams thought it important to retain 17' set _back to eliminate cars hanging into the right-of-way. 3. Alternative zoning classifications - Commissioner Rue stated this should apply to height only. The City Manager was directed to study how the City measures height limit. It was discussed that the Code and the practice of the Building Department may not be in agreement. Input was given regarding heights when 80% of the block is already developed. Councilmember Creighton stated that the % of buildup should be considered, and how the new construction would affect the homes upward. Councilmember Sheldon commended staff on their work on Area II. He stated that the City should never have higher zoning to West in a hilly city. - 1 - la Minutes 4-7-88 4. Downtown area - extensive discussion regarding the status and how it could improve. Councilmember Sheldon stated that unless the City imposes quality by covering the area with money, it will continue downward, that resources should be allocated where the problems are, and that there is no consensus between the business people. Mayor Simpson asked what are we doing about noise enforcement. Director Schubach stated that the equipment is now available, and the officers are still being trained. Commissioner Rue stated that the lighting has been improved in the area, but it still needs landscaping and cleaner sidewalks. Councilmember Creighton stated that what is needed is constant enforcement of Civil Laws. There was general concurrence on this•point, and that the area needs some landscaping improvements. City Manager Northcraft expressed that any improvements should be a partnership between the City and the businesses. Parking lot - Chairman Compton expressed that our City owned lots were unattractive, with some holes in the asphalt, and that some landscaping such as trees or brickwork would be beneficial. priority II 1. Parking Structure - There was general concurrence that there was not support for pursuing a structure at this time. Councilmember Sheldon would like the parking situation in regards to the Comedy & Magic Club studied. It appears that they are using up all the downtown parking every night. Councilmember Creighton would like an extension of the Vehicle Parking District studied. 3. Alcohol Conditional Use Permits - staff report memorandum from Alex Hernandez, Assistant Planner dated April 6, 1988. Councilmember Williams stated that a study is needed on saturation. The logging of crimes related to alcohol abuse has been requested, and this is needed for the Alcoholic Bevererage Commission. There was general concurrence that the Planning Commission should study establishing a policy regarding alcohol establishment control, and legislative control. The mechanices of control need to be explained. Councilmember Creighton expressed the need to control the consumption through ridgid enforcement of existing laws. Priority Ill 1. Circulation Analysis for General Plan - Commissioner Peirce expressed the need to get traffic off of residential streets. Mayor Simpson explained that the City has contracted with DKS for an update of this element. She requested that a copy of the Minutes of the Workshop Meeting March 17, 1988 with the Council and the consultant be provided for the Planning Commissioners. 2 • Minutes 4-7-88 2. Design Review Board - City Manager Northcraft stated that this item is scheduled on the agenda of the next City Council Meeting. Councilmember Sheldon stated that this board is needed on major pieces of land, mostly commercial on selected buildings for specific reasons. Local architects could volunteer. We need a mechanism to fix bad designs. Chairman Compton stated that the requirement for review could be based on square footage, maybe 5,000. He also expressed that design guidelines could be improved. Large projects should require sound walls. Councilmember Creighton stated that he was open to consider the review board as long as it did not include single family residences. Commissioner Rue expressed that apartments should require a Conditional Use Permit, and that it would be helpful if the commission could get landscaping plans and color schemes on projects before them. COUNCIL ITEMS (MAYQR SIMPSON) 1. Planning Commission meeting procedures - Mayor Simpson expressed concern as to the length of the meeting and that the lateness of the hour was not beneficial for full public participation. Councilmember Creighton supports the briefness of meetings, however it needs to be done fairly and completely even if it runs late. Councilmember Sheldon stated that it is not necessary to answer every public speaker, or carry on dialogue. Councilmember Williams expressed the need for the chair to see that Roberts Rules of Order are followed but the Chair has no more authority than the other members. Mayor Simpson also expressed concern regarding comments "taking of public property" in public. These type of legal statements should be discouraged. Chairman Compton expressed that "partial" taking was the meaning of the statements, and that he feels that this area of law may be changing soon. 2. Lot Merger Procedures - All Planning Commissioners stated that they were following the Ordinance property, and that the,City Attorney has concurred with this. They suggested that the City Council should carefully examine the facts of each situation before making a decision. The Council should amend the current Ordinance if they are not satisfied with the way it is functioning. 3. Infrastructure - Growth Assessment - Mayor Simpson stated that this is a way to control growth, and that our streets need improvements. 3 Minutes 4-7-88 4. General Plan Review - Mayor Simpson requested consideration of a comprehensive General Plan Review. It appears there is a piece meal approach and no general review has been done in appx. 9 years. Councilmembers Creighton & Sheldon expressed that the Council needs to direct its energies to the current issues; purchasing R/R right-of-way, Biltmore Site, lot mergers, prop LE, circulation element, and zoning code revisions. They feel this item should be addressed in a year if we have settled all the current issues. There was general support for Councilmember Rosenberger's request that the Planning Department prepare a report on the status of the General Plan, problems, and needs. City Clerk Midstokee mentioned that there is a State statute that requires a yearly report on the General Plan. Director Schubach stated that the report is only required if your General Plan -is not consistent, and you are not taking actions to correct it. OTHER,ITEMS Chairman Compton would like to see a report from the Planning Department regarding requirements on 25 foot lots not under the lot merger ordinance. He inquired regarding the recent CDBG trade -out, and if some of the amount could be used downtown. He felt the City owned property needs to be cleaned up. The monies could be expended in a partnership with the downtown merchants. A staff report from Planning was requested. CITIZEN COMMENTS Betty Martin - expressed that more communication is needed with the public regarding new standards and the rezoning. She suggested reinstatement of the City Newsletter with less expensive printing, a Kiosk at the pierhead for communication and the necessity of cleaning up the property of the former Red Lion Liquor Store. Ruth Brand - thanked the Council and Commission for having the meeting, felt is was very informative and interesting. OTHER ITEMS Councilmember Sheldon stated a need for surveying the citizens on critical issues. City Clerk Midstokke stated that an attempt was made in the last City Newsletters to ask questions of the citizens, and for them to mail their responses back. The Councilmember would like to see some ideas on how this could be done successfully. 4 Minutes 4-7-88 ADJOURNMENT The adjourned meeting of the City Council for the purpose of having a workshop with the Planning Commission adjourned at the hour of 10:22 P.M. to a regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 12, 1988 at the hour of 7:30 P.M., preceeded by a Closed Executive Session at 6:00 P.M. Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Minutes 4-7-88 • • 1, u • it n 19 4 4 • • • • • . n 20 M 27 a 9 90 97 N 31 99 32 99 99 40 ,1 42 43 44 U u ,9 91 22 01 9, 99 32 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 u VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION H BEACH TRAVEL - AIRFARE/WISNIEWSKI -204 PAGE 0001 DATE 05/05/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00252 001-400-2101-4317 00089 $356.00 05/02/88 POLICE -/CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* *356. 00 204 00204 26300 *0. 00-'"05/02/88' ;I '. t H CARTER HOUSE INN 02247 001-400-2101-4312 00617 *138.00 204 00204 26299 HOTEL ADV/WISNIEWSKI-- 204-05/02/88- POLICE- 'TRAVEL EXPENSE -F-POST-- $0.:00-05/02/88--�.I' H CARTER HOUSE INN *HOTEL ADV/WISNIEWSKI 02247 001-4001-2101-4317 00088 $24.00 20.405/02789 POLICE-"- -'--/CONFERENCE-EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** COLLEGE OF THE REDWOODS 02248 TUITION/WISNIEWSKI-'20405/02/88 * 162. 00 204 00204 26299 *0: 00-05/02/88 " - J i,. 001-400-2101-4312 00618 *10.85 POLICE-- -----ITR-VEL-EXPENSE-POS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *10. 85 204 00204 26301 12,1 t $0.00 ---05/02/88----A • H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88---- H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 - - H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 '- PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88- PUB 8 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH-88 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00204 378,977.37 04/25/88- RETIREMENT --/RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00205 *76,162.92CR 04/25/88 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00070 $868.63 04/25/88- STREET LIGHTINQ%RETIREMENT' 'c 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00070 $169.22 04/25/88-- VEH PKG"DIST /RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00070 34.427.35 04/25/88- PARKING ENF ----/RETIREMENT - 00026 115-400-3101-4180 04/25/88 MEDIANS 00043 $912.24 "/RETIREMENT 00026 115-400-3104-4180 00043 $659.69 04/25/88- TRAFFIC, -SAFETY --/RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00043 $114.76 04/25/88 DIAL A"RIDE --/RETIREMENT I:a 26297 *0.00-05/02/88- 00026 0.00--05/02/88-"- 26297 *0.00 05/02/98 ' 26297 $0.00 - 05/02/88 26297 *0.00-05/02/88 - 26297 ----"-- $0. 00 05/02/88 26297 *0. 00 - 05/02/88 - 26297• *0:00 05/02/88 26297 *0.00 05/02/88-"" i l 4 4 .1 f lk 4 • ilk • • • • • • • • 0 A • r1 7 6 9 10 12 16 '7 q 19 76 02 75 24 tS 79 23 r9 90 31 27 13 34 OS M >s • M 65 96 • 67 • • • • 60 69 SO SI Si 33 S4 SS 3. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 CITY -OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION l VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. — RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 - H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 88 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00043 $136.96 04/25/88 - ESEA — /RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3407-4180 00010 $36.39 04/25/88 — COMTR BUS STUDY -/RETIREMENT 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00043 $92.01 04/25/88— CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00070 $860.57 04/25/88--- ------- SEWER/ST DRAIN --/RETIREMENT PAGE 0002 DATE 05/05/88 I6. INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************n.*******************************+r* $11,092.17 STEVE*WISNIEWSKI PER DIEM ADVANCE STEVE*WISNIEWSKI PER DIEM -ADVANCE 01364 001-400-2101-4312 04 05/02/88-----------" --POLICE 01364 001-400-2101-4317 4--05/02/88-- POLICE- 26297 $0. 00--05/02/88 •- -'' 26297 26297 *0700-05/02/88- I. 26297 $0:00 05/02/88 —": ( 00616 $89.75 204 %TRAVEL EXPENSE -;-POST "-`--- -- $0. 00—"05/02/98-- 00087 $204.25 204 ----------/CONFERENCE-EXPENSE------------ 4 -" "--_ /CONFERENCE- EXPENSE7777 -- .- 00204 26298 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******ir************************************************************ *294. 00 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $11,915.02 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 -- MISC/CHG APRIL --1988-=-2120--04/08/88---------- POLICE 00204 26298 -$0.00-05/02/99 00501 $104.00 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE • $104.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 2120 00043 26307 $0.00- 05/02/88--1 R AMERICAN WESTERN SALES EXIT -LIGHT -BATTERIES - —32667 02070 001-400-4204-4321 00341 $159.75 32667 04777 26308 01/22/88-- BLDG MAINT '""— /BUILDING"SAFETY/SECURIT — --$159.•75 -- 05/02/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************4************************************************ $159.75 AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER MISC/CHG APRIL 89 01891 519 04/12/86 115-400-3104-4309 00534 $197.68 14519 00453 26309 TRAFFIC-SAFETY-7MAINTENANCE-"MATERIALS $0:00--05/03/88-0; *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $197.68 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL 8.*BAHA 02249 LEGAL SERV/HERRIOi 04/28/86 001-400-1132-4201 00025 $600.00 CTY PROSECUTOR --(CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAi 04085 26310 .1•1. --- 4 t 4 • • • I9 16 11 u 19 • y n • 19 16 1/ • le 19 • • N 96 • a 4.0 9e • • • • 91 33 S1 Si 90 9I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- --- - — — - --- DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************a***#*********a#**a* R ROD*BARKER WORK GUAR REFUND PAGE 0003 DATE 05/05/88 INV/REF PO $ CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $600.00 01083 001-210-0000-2110 02131 $175.00 04/28188 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEt *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JOHN P. *BARRY —LEGAL SERV/FEB MAR88 $175.00 00031 001-400-1132-4201 00024 $675.00 04/28/88------- CTY PROSECUTOR --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT"-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GARY*BRUTSCH REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSE $675.00 05916 26311 $0.00 05/03/88 04084 26312 $0.00 05/03/88 00673 001-400-1141-4317 00004 $554.71 04/30/88--" "' — CITY TREASURER --/CONFERENCE EXPENSE"" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • W. ROBERT*BUCHINSKY THEATRE TECH/APR88 $554.71 02116 001-400-4601-4201 00192 $365.00 04/28/88 ----"---COMM RESOURCES"--/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT-" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CARL M. *BUCK BUILDING CO. -CITATION PMT REFUND $365.00 05924 26313 $0.00 - 05/03/88 04858 26314 I' -- $0. 00 — 05/03/88-- 02255 110-300-0000-3302 20474 $28.00 04/30/88— `---/COURT FINES/PARKING - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. PARKS MAINT/APR88 --- $28. 00 00599 001-400-6101-4201 00103 $7.263.33 04/25/88— " PARKS " " ___ - -- -/CONTRACT -SERV ICE/PR IVAT " ".. __'--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.263.33 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON WATER BILL/APR88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON WATER-BILL/APR88 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00222 04/30/88--"- -- '- BLDG MA/NT"" 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00198 04%30/88 PARKS $478.13 /UTILITIES $762.05 /UTILITIES 06203 26315 $0.00 -- 05/03/88 05758 26316 $0.00 - 05/03/88 ( ( ( ( I 06207 26317' . 14,1 $0.00---05/03/88 06207 26317 $0. 00--05/03/88" �.. L l • • • • 16 11 22 13 I6 11 16 • 20 0 0 0 0 4 0 • • • • • • • 12 11 26 29 16 17 16 29 30 31 32 33 N 39 36 3, 06 29 69 u 42 66 66 u w 40 SO 91 91 90 9. SS M 92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 14, PAGE 0004 DATE 05/05/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON WATER BILL/APR88 00016 04/30/88 115-400-3101-4303 00153 MEDIANS INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP t � 1 41 $2,160.7706207 26317 4, 6I /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************a***r************************************ CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT MISC/CHG APRIL1988 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT MISC/CHG APRIL 88 $3. 400. 95 $0.-00--05/03/88 00389 001-400-4101-4305 00197 $12.25 04/30/88 PLANNING _ ----/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES 00389 110-400-3302-4305 00406 $12.72 04/30/88 — PARKING ENF' %OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES-- *** UPPLIES-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $24.97 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC/CHG'APRIL 88 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC/CHG APRIL -88 • R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC/CHG APRIL -88 1'00014 001-400-2101-4311 00484 1974504/04/88-- POLICE 00014 001-400-4201-4311 00113 19745--04/04188— - — --- BUILDING 19745 *5. 20CR /AUTO -MAINTENANCE $24.35 -/AUTO MAINTENANCE 00014 001-400-4204-4311 00089 $31.29 104/04/88 — - _ BLDG MAINT _." --/AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.44 "i 00048 26318 4. $0. 00----05/02/88---"- 00048 26318 --- $0.00-- 05/04/88 19745 00049 26319 ' $0.00--05/03/88 19745 00049 26319 $0.00-05/03/88 t ./. 19745 00049 26319 1, t - " $0. 00__05/03/88" . 1 i' R COAST SIGNS & GRAPHICS CUSHMAN/CAUTION SIGNS --7401 00352 110-400-3302-4309 00398 $255.60 7401 05288 26320 04/21/98 — - PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -' $0.00 - 05/02/88- 05/02/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $255.60 OFCR NANCY*COOK MEALS/LASER-SCHOOL 02173 001-400-2101-4312 04/28/88---- - POLICE 00619 $7.25 ---"/TRAVEL EXPENSE POST-"- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.25 R THE *DEVELOPMENT MISC/CHG APRIL 1988 05668 26321 $0.00 05/03/88 00147 001-400-2101-4305 00683 $41.85 04/30/88--'----- -POLICE — — /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES $41.85 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DISCOVER USA NEW HIRE SAFETY -VESTS 00271 001-400-2101-4187 00175 -11J 04/11/88 "' POLICE 00414 26322' $0. 00 —05/02/88- ---. 1( 4 t 4 $862.65 D -11-J 04694 26323 I� -/UNIFORM ALLOWANCE "— - - ._ $862.65 ' 05/02/881 �� I' t 17 44.4 • • ;-' • • • s • • • • • 1 1 0 m • • 1 • • • 10 16 16 1, 16 19 29 21 22 73 24 23 26 21 26 71 30 31 32 33 34 33 36 31 36 39 40 u 42 63 66 63 46 6/ 66 69 60 23 33 91 33 96 9/ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0005 DATE 05/05/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 't R DISCOVER USA 00271 001-400-2101-5400 00163 $633.68 D -11-H 05515 26323 ll( BODY ARMOR/POLICE -11-H 04/11188— "---- - POLICE--"-"" /—"- EGUIPMENT $633.6805/02/88 *** VENDORTOTAL******************************************************************** $1,496.33 1 DUNN-EDWARDS PAINT CO. 00161 001-400-4204-4309 00918 $241.76 140173343 05751 26324 PAINT/LAWN BOWLING— '-73343 04/20/88---` - ". "-. BLDG MAINT MAINTENANCE MATERIALS- " - ---- $0. 00— 05/02/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************a************************ • $241.76 R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1203-4201 00311 $32.00 05824 26325 EMP ADV/APR88 04/28/88— . ..- PERSONNEL ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT-.-----' $0. 00"--05/03/88" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OFCR TOM*ECKERT MEALS/LASER CLASS $32. 00 01958 001-400-2101-4312 00625 $7.25 04/28/88— POLICE - --/TRAVEL-EXPENSE-4 POST- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.25 05655 26326 $0. 00--- 05/03/88 4 4 4 4 4 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00256 $195.69 24165 05738 26327 4 REPAIR HYDR JACK 24165-04/20/88 EGUIP SERVICE —/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- - ---- $0:00-05/02/88— —" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $195.69 R FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 01962 001-400-2101-4305 00685 $20.00 OVERNIGHT-MAIL/P.D. 04/2'8780 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00-05/03/88- 05673 0.00-05/03/88- 05673 26328 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** DAN*FETLER WORK GUAR REFUND $20. 00 02252 001-210-0000-2110 02132 $175.00 05915 26329 04/28/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK--GUARANTEE $0.00---05/03/89-.: *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $175. 00 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00165 $39.80 TELE CHG/APR88 04%30/88 CITY COUNCIL— TELEPHONE 4 4 4 1• ,,4 . 06208 26331 $0.00 -05/03/88 -- a 0.00 -05/03/88-- a 4 a a 16 • 1 • • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • • • • • 7i 21 23 24 15 26 7, 26 16 N 36 16 19 46 .1 .i 43 N .1 .6 U .9 61 45 u 57 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 CITY OF-HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY -TELE CHG/APR88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1122-4304 00022 04/30/88-- . ELECTIONS 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00101 04/30/88-- CITY ATTORNEY 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00154 04/30/88- - CITY TREASURER INV/REF I� PAGE 0006 1` DATE 05/05/88 PO # CHK # I; : y.. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $52.54 /TELEPHONE - - -- - - - $222.36 "/TELEPHONE $42.99 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-40d-1201-4304 00166 $85.98 04/30/88-- CITY MANAGER '--/TELEPHONE - -- ----- 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00171 $63.69 04/30/88- -' FINANCE ADMIN ---/TELEPHONE .-_- '00015 001-400-1203-4304 00170 $28.66 04/30/88---- - ----PERSONNEL- ---PERSONNEL- - - - -/TELEPHONE GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88. -- - R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00099 $180.87 04/30/88- - DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00087 ;$27.07 04/30/88 --- BUS LICENSE ..- /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00245 $478.57 04/30/887----------- POLICE ----/TELEPHONE - R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 00015 001-400-2201-4304 04/30/88-- - FIRE 00106 $249.39 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00159 $4.77 06208 26331 $0.00' ' 05/03/88-1.. 06208 26331 I'• $0.00 --05/03/88--Mi 06208 26331 $0.00---05/03/88----p 06208 26331 $0.00 - 05/03/88 06208 26331 -- $0.00- 05/03/88 04/30/88- ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE - -' 00015 001-400-2701-4304 00066 $4.20 04/30/88 CIVIL DEFENSE `/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00172 $106.68 04/30/88- - PLANNING- _-.---/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00170 04/30/88- BUILDING 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00172 04/30/88 - - PUB WKS ADMIN $119.41 /TELEPHONE -- $303.77 77 -/TELEPHONE 06208 26331 $0. 00 05/03/88 - 06208 26331 $0.00-05/03/618-- 06208 0.00--05/03/88---' 06208 26331 -- $0.00- 05/03/88 -- W Vir 06208 26331 $0.00 - 05/03/88 i1 26331 06208 $0.00 05/03/88 06208 26331 I tid -- $0.00 -- -05/03/88 ----I, 06208 26331 $0.00 05/03/88 06208 26331 $0.00-- 05/03/88'- . 5/03/88' - 06208 26331 $0.00 05/03/88 06208 26331 $0.00 - 05/03/88 - L •♦ II' • • • • • 0 11 0 0 • 0 • • • • • 0 • • • tte 11 22 I. II 25 26 21 20 79 32 31 u )9 34 ff fe 3 39 40 41 42 43 44 If 16 4' 44 49 30 31 SI 32 51 11 16 ft FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME �W"r •L Admr•••s— r+.__ Jig L "am — — — � CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY •ELE CHG/APR88 PAGE 0007 DATE 05/05/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00342 $18.07 04/30/88- -- BLDG-MAINT- /BUILDING SAFETWSECURIT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00187 $256.88 04/30/88 - COMM RESOURCES '/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00101 04/30/88 - - PARKS 00015 110-400-3301-4304 00081 04/30/88 - VEH PKG DIST 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00168 04/30/88-__--_-- PARKING ENF - 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00002 04/30/88- - DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 - - R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY --TELE CHG/APR88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 - R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHG/APR88 $1.59 -/TELEPHONE' - *19.55 /TELEPHONE $217.54 /TELEPHONE -- --------- $16.66 ire 06208 26331 $0.00`-05/04/88 -! 1;11 06208 26331 $0.00 - 05/04/88 06208 26331 $0.00-- 05/04/88 06208 26331 $0.00 05/03/88 06208 26331 --- $0.00-05/03/88 --"-_. R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 145-400-3402-4304 00002 $16.66 TELE CHG/APR88 04/30/88— ESEA - --- /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************a•***•M•****************** • $2,557.70 06208 26331 $0. 00-- 05/04/88 ----- 06208 26331 $0. 00 -05/03/88 -_ - R ROBERT*GRAHAM 02198 001-210-0000-2110 02126 $50.00 ANIMAL -TRAP REFUND 04/28/88— - - - - -/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 1;50.00 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 02102 160-400-8405-4201 00014 $6.905.00 04/25/88--- --- -- - - 05760 26333 SEWER ENG SERV/MAR88 CIP 85 -405 ------/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT _-"----- $0:00 -05/03/88 - *** 0:00' ---"05/03/88-"*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 05921 26332 $0.00 - -- -05/03/88 - $6,905.00 R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BLDG OFF 00781 001-400-2201-4316 00119 $129.34 PUBLICATIONS/FIRE- -------926-0 03/25/88 -'- - FIRE - /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $129.34 .1. iV 26926-0 05319 26334 $129.34-05/02/88- • R OFCR LANCE*JAAKOLA 02137 001-400-2101-4312 00628 $138.00 HOTEL/DUI SEMINAR 04/28/88- - 05632 26335 POLICE - - /TRAVEL EXPENSE-.- POST— $0. 00----05/03/88 --_. I •[3; • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • 10 11 14 .0 26 20 FINANCE -8F4340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAGE 0008 DATE 05/05/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF PO $ CHK $ DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R OFCR LANCE*JAAKOLA 02137 001-400-2101-4312 00629 $74.75 05631 26335 HOTEL/DUI SEMINAR 04/28/89 POLICE -/TRAVEL EXPENSE , -POST $0.00-05/03/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $212.75 R TEREA*JOHNSON4sti ' 00444 001-400-2101-4313 00143 $210.00 05653 26336 MEALS/HOTEL/ORG'CR/ME CL 04/28/89POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL $210. 00 $0.00-05/04/88----, R KAVANAUGH DEVELOPMENT CO, INC. 02061 001-210-0000-2110 02128 $150.00 05919 26337 WORK GUAR REFUND 04/28/88-- - - /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE--- *0:00 —05/03/88- -- *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $150.00 R OFCR BONNIE*KENDALL 02174 001-400-2101-4312 00620 $7.25 05666 26338 MEALS/LASER SCHOOL : . 04/28/88-- -- POLICE -- ---/TRAVEL-EXPENSET-POST----- $0.00—'05/03/88-- w *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************$7.25 .. 4. 31 —,. 32 nR KETCH -ALL COMPANY 00483 001-400-2401-4309 00072 $273.62 ANIMAL- CONTROL-EGU/13----648-44-----04/22/88-- 648-H 05269 26339 ANIMAL CONTROL—MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -$0. 00- —05/02/88- *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $273.62 se St 21 39 so 41 43 44 40 46 42 60 49 62 03 04 SS 00 il2 . 41ir • ++ - ww, R SGT JOHN*KOEBSELL 00629 001-400-2101-4312 00626. rh, $7.25 MEALS/LASER CLASS 04/28/88-- 05654 26340 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE-, POST $0.00--05/03/88---- '*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $7.25 • kwr R JOHN*LEE 02253 001-210-0000-2110 02129 $325.00 05918 26341 WORK -GUAR -REFUND 04/29/88.---- ----IDEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $325.00 R JEREMY*LOEB 02078 001-400-4601-4201 00191 $310.00 04857 26342 THEATRE-TECH/APR88 04/28/88 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00-05/03/88 •f Iq e 11 12 3, e 29 22 e 27 26 e 2.. 7tl " 19 0 3 31 N FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH "'-.---..- DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************************a•***+r************* - - --- - R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. MISC/CHG MARCH 88 17310 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. --"" MISC/CHC MARCH 88 17310 00077 001-400-8606-4201 00009 03/02/88 - CIP 87-606 - 00077 115-400-3104-4201 00050 TRAFFIC SAFETY - PAGE 0009 DATE 05/05/88 INV/REF PO AMOUNT UNENC $310.00 I'0 # CHK # DATE EXP - (3i1 $21.03 217310 00325 26343 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE -- " $0.00"" 05/03/88 $32.98 217310 00325 26343 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR/VAT-- --------_ $0. 00 "-_ 05/03/98 --" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOS ANGELES CO DISTRICT ATTY LEGAL SERV/DEC87 00386 04/28/88 $54. 01 001-400-1131-4251 00060 $90.25 CITY ATTORNEY" --/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $90.25 R COUNTY OF *LOS ANGELES 87-88 LOCAL TAX ROLL 00287 001-400-4201-4251 00023 $380.05 04/28/88— - ---- BUILDING - /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JAMES P. *LOUGH LEGAL/SERV APRIL 88- $380. 05 04938 26344 •$0.00-05/03/88 -' 04939 26345 $0.00-05/03/88- 00938 0.00--05/03/88- 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00375 $5,921.00 04086 26346 05/03/88- CITY ATTORNEY -- -"-/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT-----. $0.00- 05/03/88 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5.921.00 f! _ • ,9 R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH 00183 001-400-2101-4311 00481 $2.782.15 4151 05600 26347 REPAIR MOTORCYLES _.— --4151-03/30/88 POLICE .-"----->AUTO-MAINTENANCE $2.971.35-05/02/88 W e,1 62 u e � 0 0 0 0 e 66 a N SV 51 52 63 N 6f 56 fl *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANHATTAN CAR WASH MISC/CHO MARCH -1988 $2. 782. 15 01146 001-400-2101-4311 00483 $87.90 03/31/88- POLICE-` -/AUTO--MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MARINEBANC LEASING CO.. INC. LEASE/PMT/ MAY 88 $87.90 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00006 $417.96 04/26/88- EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS 1.0 00328 26348 $0.00- 05/02/88--1. '; 4' 00054 26349 $0.00-05/02/88- t;v • • • • • • • • • • 0 • 0 • • • 9 10 12 13 14 IS 16 I/ 18 21 32 24 25 15 1i 21 24 31 32 33 34 35 36 3/ 33 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 4/ 48 14 42 $1 44 SS 34 31 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 VND ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION iG PAGE 0010 I: c_ DATE 05/05/88 4.* INV/REF PO CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $417.96 7 EDWARD D. *MC KEEGAN CITATION REFUND 02242 110-300-0000-3302 04/27/88 - LI hi. 20467 $41.00 05198 26350 /COURT-FINES/PARKING- $0.00 05/02/88:---P ku4 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R SUE*MC KITRICK CITATION REFUND 02240 110-300-0000-3302 -05/02/88— $41.00 20465 $41.00 05200 26351 ---ICOURT FINES/PARKING--------------- $0.00 05/04/138 - • ! 14* 06209 26352 $0. 00 --- 05/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $41.00 MCI MAIL 'MON SERV/APR88 1'02153 001-400-1206-4304 00100 $10.45 04/30/88 DATA PROCESSING -/TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** • R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MISC CHG/MAR88 $10.45 00388 001-400-2201-4310 00062 $15.60 05197 26353 04/28/88-- FIRE - ---/MOTORFUELS AND LUBES----------- $0:00-05/04/88- *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $15.60 R MOHLE. GROVER & ASSOCIATES 01499 150-400-8138-4201 00031 $360.78 FAU SERV/MAR88 04/21/88 CIP 85-138 ---/CONTRACT SERV10E/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $360.78 R MONARCH BROOM MISC/CHG APRIL 88 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00627 $456.88 6451-- 04/20/88-- - ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $456.88 R SHARON G.*MOSIER ANIMAL TRAP REFUND SHARON G. *MOSIER ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 02254 001-210-0000-2110 04/28/88 02254 001-210-0000-2110 04128/89- 02125 $50.00 --/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE -------- $0.00 6451 -* l- 05754 26354 $0.00 05/03/88 l• 00430 26355 $0.00 05/03/88 - , 05922 26356. 05/03/88 02127 $50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 05920 26356 $0.00 - 05/03/88 • • . IU • 11 • • • 1.1 '4 11 19 10 11 • 17 1! • • • 0 0 0 • 0 0 16 11 19 99 11 32 33 N 36 36 L 9a 9 46 111 .e U 44 96 U 44 49 6. 61 52 99 N 55 FINANCE-SFA34O TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAGE 0011 DATE 05/05/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN S AMOUNT INV/REF PO $ CHK M - DATE INVC PROJ 8 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL**************a•+ra••ra•*•a•r**********************a•**•x**a•*•x•xa****a•a•*** *** $100. 00 R ANETA 0.*MURPHY 02243 110-300-0000-3302 20468 $41.00 06205 26357 CITATION REFUND — - 04/27/88-" /COURT FINES/PARKING-" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $41.00 $0.00 05/02/88. R NABER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES 00656 001-400-2101-4313 00142 $346.30 05660 26358 TUITION/D. HATANO" """ -- 04/28/88— POLICE - ---/TRAVEL EXPENSE; -"STC----"- ---- $0. 00--- 05/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $346.30 R NATIONS PRINTING 00725 001-400-1208-4305 00490 $51.65 7341 05196 26359 BLUEPRINT COPIES /341 -04/25/88— GEN APPROP " /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES _. $0.00-- 05/02/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $51.65 • R KEVIN*NORTHCRAFT 02064 001-400-1201-4317 00128 $67.44 04083 26360 MON EXP/APRIL88 04/28/88 -- " "" CITY MANAGER --/CONFERENCE EXPENSE ------"---- $0.00-- 05/03/88-1. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JOHN*ODUM RETIREMENT ADV/APR88 $67.44 4.6 01013 001-400-1213-4180 00206$1,352.50 05825 26361 '••• RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT ; - -------- -- --� ---- $0.00-- 05/03/88—. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** OLGUIN-RUTHERFORD WORK GUAR REFVND $1.352.50 01917 001-210-0000-2110 02130 $175.00 05917 26362 04/28/88- - /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE$0.00 05/03/88-_._-i $175.00 ,' i"' 03/22/88 POLICE - ---/AUTO MAINTENANCE"--------------" $0.00- 05/02/88----.,' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER REPAIR PD CAR/HM-4 `L• 00093 001-400-2101-4311 00482 $305.90 05605 26363' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $305.90 • R MILTON*OWENS 01580 001-210-0000-2110 02124 819500.00 05923 26364 DAMAGE DEPOSIT -REFUND 04/28/98-- "- /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE'----"_ $0.00 " 05/03/88- I • • • • • • 0 • 10 1. 29 .1 • 20 24 25 • 26 • • • 0 0 0 • • 0 0 • 2. 22 32 25 36 it 26 39 40 42 43 35 46 41 u AI 50 St 92 53 04 40 62 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0012 DATE 05/05/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************+**************************************** $1.500.00 R PEPSI -COLA BOTTLING COMPANY 00144 001-400-1208-4201 00439 $31.36 VEND/MACHINE/RENT JUN88 "' -` 04/26/88 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $31. 36 R LOIS J.*PETERSEN 02246 110-300-0000-3302 20471 $15.00 04/27/88 -- - - CITATION REFUND 00031 26365 $0.00 05/02/88 06201 26366 /COURT FINES/PARKING ` $0.00 " 05/02/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15.00 R POM INCORPORATED ,.00223 110-400-3302-5400 00087 $822.75 804157 05245 26367 COIN COLLECTION CART'- -04157- 02/11/88r---- PARKING ENF '--/EQUIPMENT -. • $805. 05 ___ 05/02/88 -- R POM INCORPORATED 00223 110-400-3302-5400 00088 $4.770.96 8022270 05244 26367 PARKING METERS 22270------04/08/88 PARKING ENF ----/EQUIPMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5.593.71 1 4 $4. 998. 11 -- 05/02/88 "-" ' R RICK*PRESS 02241 110-300-0000-3302 20466 $82.00 05199 26368 CITATION REFUND 05/02/88 -/COURT FINES/PARKING - `- -- - $0.00_-_05/02/88' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $82.00 RADIO SHACK MISC/CHG APRIL -1988 • 01429 001-400-2101-4305 00682 $6.33 04/30/88- - POLICE-- -- __ _ _ /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES " • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6.33 i0 00435 26369 --- $0.00 _ 05/02/88 _. R RESCUE MEDICAL DISTRIBUTORS 02239 001-400-2101-4309 00138 $746.25 MM015196 05633 26370 DESC. CPR MASKS- - -15196 04/14/88- --_- - POLICE- -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 _ _ 05/02/88 _' R RESCUE MEDICAL DISTRIBUTORS 02239 001-400-2201-4309 00428 $179.00 MM015196 05633 26370 -DESC: CPR MASKS- - 15196 04/14/88--_.____ _--___'_ FIRE -- - -_-/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .. . __ _ -. $0.00-- 05/02%88 . *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $925.25 . RYDER TRUACK RENTAL NO.348238 02245 110-300-0000-3302 20470 $48.00 06202 26371 CITATION REFUND-- -- - 04/27/88- -_..__ ____ ---/COURT FINES/PARKING $0. 00 ----05/02/88- ---- I • • , 9 6 • IP Ie • • 10 „ „ 18 • }4 • • • • 11 23 A 74 26 2/ :6 26 30 „ 11 „ • • 0 e 4 40 4, 46 V 40 49 90 6, sr 33 3, 33 66 6/ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 VND S ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ # PAGE 0013 ' DATE 05/05/88 TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO $ CHK N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OFCR R. *SALDANA - _MEALS/LASER SCHOOL 02165 001-400-2101-4312 04/28/88- POLICE $48.00 f f 4,6 00622 $7.25 05664 26372 /TRAVEL EXPENSE .-POST---- ------ $0.00 '-05/03/88.--- . I *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. REIMB LIAR/FED-MAR88 R SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. REIMD WORK COMP/MAR88 R SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. REIMS WORK COMP/MAR88 00824 705-400-1209-4324 00032 03/31/813- LIABILITY INS -- 00824 705-400-1217-4182 00049 04/25/88- - WORKERS COMP 00824 705-400-1217-4183 00038 04/25/88- WORKERS COMP --- $7.25 $4,324.99 --/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS----- $23,910.25 --/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS--"- $23,910.25 /WORKERS -COMP -.CURRENT -YR 05823 26373 - -- $0.00 --- 05/04/88 $5.974.08 /WORKERS - COMP PRIOR -YR " - - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER, INC. RANGE USE/SEP87-MAR88 02250 001-400-2101-4201 04/28/88-----.__..._...--- POLICE $34.209.32 00253 $890.06 I • W. 05821 26373 $0.00-- 05/03/88- 05821 5/03/88- 05821 26373 $0.00- 05/03/88-- -' 05621 26374 -./CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT--- _-__$0.00_.--.05/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $890.06 R SONSHINE PRINT SHOP PRINT SERV/PUD WORKS 20239 02238 115-400-3104-4305 00003 04/15/88-7" TRAFFIC SAFETY $49.88 20239 05750 26375 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/02/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $49.88 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT -CITE SURCHARGg/APR88 00118 110-300-0000-3302 04/30/88- 20472 $15.237.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT $319.00 COURT BAIL /COURT FINES/PARKING-- 00400 INES/PARKING-` 00400 110-300-0000-3302 20475 04/30/88- $15, 237.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $319.00 ' R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY 00162 001-400-2201-4305 00180 MISC/CHG MARCH 88 - 57254 03/04/88 FIRE $2.89 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 06211 26376 $0.00 05/03/88 06108 26377 - $0.00 05/03/88 57254 00341 26378 $0.00 05/03/88' 1• 0 0 • • 0 0 0 0 11 13 14 11 IM1 '5 1. 1.1 25 12 1. • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 32 71 >. 1, 16 IS 1, w 42 43 44 45 ./ 48 11 w 11 52 53 54 ft 54 ,1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SOUTH BAY OFFICE MISC/CHG MARCH -88 SUPPLY 00162 001-400-4101-4305 00198 - -5725403/04/88- . PLANNING R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC/CHG MARCH 88 --" -57254 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC/CHG MARCH 88 --57254 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE MISC/CHG MARCH 88 00162 001-400-4201-4305 00285 03/04/88 - BUILDING - 00162 001-400-4202-4305 03/04/88 - PUB WKS PAGE 0014 DATE 05/05/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $10.61 /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES 57254 00341 26378 $0. 00"'-05/03/88 $31.47 57254 00341 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 00275 $3.20 ADMIN /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES 26378 -"05/03/88 57254 00341 26378 - "- $0.00 -05/03/88- SUPPLY 00162 001-400-4205-4309 00257 $37.15 57254 00341 26378 -5725— 03/04/88-- "" EQUIP SERVICE ---/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS----.- -` $0.00-05/03/88 a** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. MON GAS BILLS/APR88 $85.32 '00170 001-400-4204-4303 00223 $824.39 04/30/88 BLDG MAINT -/UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 St/SWEEPER April 88 '2209----04/30/88 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE St/SWEEPER April 88 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE St/SWEEPER April 88 001-400-3103-4201 00154 ST MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-6101-4201 00102 _ -220904/30/88-- - PARKS CO 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00155 "2209 - 04/30/88-- VEH PKG DIST $824.39 06210 26379 $0.00-05/03/88- $1,617.50 0.00-05/03/88 $1,617.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2,101.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2,067.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5,786.00 R STEPHENS, INC. PRISONER SHAMPOO - R STEPHENS. INC. PRISONER BEDDING 01029 001-400-2101-4306 39918 04/11/88_ POLICE 01029 001-400-2101-4306 39919----04/06/88 POLICE R STEPHENS, INC. PRISONER COMBS ---'-'39920 00498 $198.74 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 00499 $267.19 ---/PRISONER MAINTENANCE -.- 01029 001-400-2101-4306 00500 -04/11/88- - POLICE ' $31.39 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $497.32 R SUN BADGE COMPANY POLICE OFCR BADGES 00806 001-400-2101-4187 04/28/88 - POLICE 2209 00029 $0.00 26380 05/02/88 2209 00029 26380 •--- -" $0.00---05/02/88--- 2209 0.00-"-05/02/88--- 2209 00029 $0.00 A39918 05687 $200.30 26380 05/02/88 26381 05/02/88 39919 05686 26381 - " $259.40- 05/02/88 A39920 05597 $27.36 26381 05/02/88 00176 $366.89 05670 26382 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE -- '" '-'""' "" $0.00 "05/03/88 • gab • • 1 • 6 • • • It, • • • • • 0 Q 4 0 O • • 31 tf 36 t: u 39 ., .t 43 44 15 46 .l a 49 w 11 ft ft N 6f f6 v CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 10:52:44 FOR 05/10/88 PAGE 0015 DATE 05/05/88 I. PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R SUN BADGE COMPANY 00806 001-400-2201-4187 00091$57.19 00443 26382 '' V' --"" MISC/CHG APRIL -1988 04/30/88- - FIRE - /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE"-- -- $0.00 - 05/02/88 "-I' *** VENDOR TOTAL********•ir************#•x•*a•*a************************p..M.##***•a#******** $424.08 R MARJANA*TERZIC 02201 001-210-0000-2110 02133 $150.00 05914 26383 WORK GUAR REFUND 04/28/88--------- -" -/DEPOSITS/WORK -GUARANTEE - --- $0. 00--05/03/88 ..- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $150.00kdi R TOPAZ AUTO LEASING 02256 110-300-0000-3302 20473 $43.00 06206 26384 ----CITATION PMT REFUND -- 04/30/88-- "... - - "./COURT FINES/PARKING- `- $0.00 05/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $43.00 R CITY OF*TORRANCE 1988 ASSESSMENT/P.D. 00841 001-400-2101-4316 00218 $185.00 05671 26385 04/15/88-- POLICE - -/TRAINING _ ..._ _ . _ _..." $0.00 05/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $185.00 R OFCR TIMOTHY R.*TUREK 01830 001-400-2101-4312 00627 $50.25 05649 26386 - "— 'HOTEL/DUI SEMINAR 04/28/98--" POLICE - -/TRAVEL EXPENSE POST - " - - $0.00-05/03/98 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *50.25 R UNION METAL CORPORATION 00405 . 105-400-8201-5400 00007 $1,645.96 04265 26387 ST. LITE POLE/HERMOSA AV 05/02/88- CIP 85-201-"-%EGUIPMENT $2,895.74--05/02/88-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.645.96 R OFCR WILLIAM*VINCENT 02251 001-400-2101-4312 00623 $7.25 05663 26388 MEALS/LASER . SCHOOL 04/28/88- - -- . " POLICE -"- /TRAVEL, � EXPENSE-,-- POST------- $O. 00 - 05/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.25 R JACK*WALL LEASING 02244 110-300-0000-3302 20469 $41.00 06204 26389 CITATION REFUND 04/27/88 /COURT-FINES/PARKING $0:00-05/02/88- 14. 0 4' • 0 OI 0 0 0 0 0 . •6 Y 20 11 1. 16 16 1s .0 0'71 0 e 0 • 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 7, 16 76 7/ 76 7a 11 ,1 1. ,6 76 ,7 „ ,h w 01 N ,5 06 a b 60 24 66 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:52:44 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/10/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0016 : DATE 05/05/88 ' INV/REF PO # CHK # � 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************air** $41.00 OFCR JAMES*WHIPKEY MEALS/LASER SCHOOL 00553 001-400-2101-4312 00624 04/28/88- POLICE $7.25 /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST - ..'--_- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** SALLY A. *WHITE SEC SERV/APR 5.88 SALLY A. *WHITE SEC SERV/MAR23 00140 001-400-4102-4201 04/30/88— PLANNING 00140 001-400-4203-4201 04/28/88--_--__-- - BOARD OF $7.25 05662 26390 $0.00 "- 05/03/88 00144 $337.50 COMM- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- 00054 $30.00 APPEAL -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PAUL *WOLCOTT MEALS/LASER SCHOOL 00129 001-400-2101-4312 04/28/88-- -- -- POLICE $367.50 00621 $7.25 " - , /TRAVEL -EXPENSE- . POST-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.25 XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00072 $385.18 INIT PMT/XEROX 10382 05/02/88--- GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS 00135 001-400-2101-4305 00684 $134.30 STAPLES/P.D. XEROX 05/02/88- POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $519.48 R XEROX CORPORATION *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $109.863.50 *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $121,778.52 06001 26391 - -- $0.00- 05/03/88 - 04937 26391 $0.00- 05/03/88- 05665 26392 ------ $0.00 -05/03/88-- 00050 .. 05/03/88 _- - _ 00050 26393 $0.00 05/02/88 05669 26393 $0.00 - 05/04/88 "1 i° 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DCMAN(IS OR,//� CLAIMS COVERED By • THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES-I_OLI2INCLUStVE OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR�1iARE ACCURATE AND FUN S ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT THEREOF: &Itte) FINANCE 157X-STRATOR ar 1ATE Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 4, 1988 City Council Meeting of May 10, 1988 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC._DBPQSITS. QR,.1iERMQSI _BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of April 1988. Respectfully submitted, City Treasurer NOTED: Kevin Northcrtft City Manager IN T. T T'TAL INVESTMENT REPORT - APRIL 1988 DA E •F INVE TM N A F BALANCE 3/31/88 Withdrawal Investment Balance 4/31/88 County Saving. $ati 1c Investment Farmers.Savings Investment $3,520,000.00 (50,000.00) 100,000.00 $3,570,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 99,000.00 Caiif9rnia Federpl S &, L Investment $ 100,000.00 First Cali Qrnia_Fed, S.& L Investment Long Beach_ S &. L Investment BrQc*side S_,& L Investment $ 99,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 99,000.00 12/23/87 3/23/88 12/28/87 1/6/88 1/6/88 1/13/88 DAT OF MATU TY 4/18/88 4/19/88 1/6/89 10/3/88 6/31/88 1/6/89 1/6/89 1/12/89 INT ' ES 8.05% 8.375% 7.75% 8.15% 9.0% 8.5% 8.5% Cal, American Saving Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% perpetual_ Savings Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Paci f#.c.,Sayings,_ Bank Investment$ 0 9 .00 1 1 9,0 0/ 3/88 1/12/89 8.85% Beyerly_HillsS & L Investment $ 99,000.00 1/15/88 1/17/89 9.15% North Americe_S,&L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/2/89 8.50% FAcnders S,_& .L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/3/89 8.625% Westwoo& _ S. && L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/5/88 2/3/89 8.50% American Dlyersi_Save, Bang Investment $ 99,000.00 2/9/88 2/8/89 8.25% Butterfield $ _ & It Investment $ 99,000.00 2/18/88 2/22/89 8.20% GoldenGate_Bank Investment $ 99,000.00 2/24/88 2/23/89 8.0% Huntington $,&_L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/25/88 2/24/89 Cplumbia_ ,L Investment $ 99,000.00 3/3/88 2/27/89 We3tern Federal Investment $ 400,000.00 3/31/88 3/17/89 FHJMc Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 3/26/87 3/1/17 Investment $ 249,320.88 5/26/87 8/2/16 TOTAL BALANCE $6,53,454.52 Respectfully Submitted, City Treasurer April 21, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 AWARD CONTRACT FOR DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1) award the bid to Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. for the downtown area maintenance for the cost as follows: - FY 88-89 $ 71,386 FY 89-90 $ 74,247 FY 90-91 $ 77,111 Total $222,744, 1) authorize the Mayor to sign the contract, and 2) authorize staff to issue change orders as necessary within budget limitations. Background: At the January 12, 1988 meeting, City Council approved the contract and specifications for the downtown area maintenance and authorized staff to advertise for bids and issue addenda as necessary. On January 14, 1988 Request for Proposals were mailed to ten (10) prospective firms. Two bids were received, publicly opened and read aloud on the bid due date (February 11, 1988). Staff returned to Council on February 23, 1988 with the recommendation that the bids be rejected because of technical errors in the bids received; concerns regarding the wording in the specifications and the need to more clearly delineate funding sources for the individual activities. On March 16, 1988, Request for Proposals for the downtown area maintenance were mailed to six prospective bidders. Historical Background At the March 22, 1983 meeting Council awarded a one year contract to Specialty Maintenance Company to sweep and clean the lots in the Vehicle Parking District. Subsequently, at the February 28, 1984 meeting, Council extended this contract for a period of four (4) years at no increase in cost. At the September 8, 1987 meeting, Council approved a contract addendum for the provisions of the municipal pier maintenance. The current contract expired on March 22, 1988. At that time Specialty Maintenance agreed to a month to month extension of the contract (at no increase in cost) for the remainder of the fiscal year. 1 41. 1f Prior to 1983, the downtown area maintenance was performed by the Public Works Department. The department does not have the personnel necessary to maintain this area at the same level of service as the contractor. Analysis: This analysis will be divided as follows: 1) The Bids Received 2) Existing Cost 3) Comparison of Bids 4) Contractor's Performance 5) Level of Service 6) Fiscal Impact 7) Summary 1) The Bids Received On April 14, 1988 the following bids were received, publicly opened and read aloud. Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc $222,744 (3 year bid) California Street Maintenance $249,898 (3 year bid) The bids are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. 2) Existing Cost The existing annual cost is as follows: Total (FY 87-88) Vehicle Parking District $40,020 Fishing Pier 23,027 Other downtown area maintenance * Upper Pier Avenue Sweeping 4,200 Total $67,247 * Work not currently contracted. 3) Comparison of Bids These totals are for the three year period. The breakdown is as follows: Specialty Maintenance Company, Inc. Vehicle Parking Dist. Fishing Pier Other Downtown Areas Pier Ave. Sweeping Totals FY 88-89 $ 39,004 24,282 3,600 4,500 $ 71,386 FY 89-90 $ 40,570 25,253 3,744 4,680 $ 74,247 FY 90-91 $ 42,134 26,229 3,888 4.860 $ 77,111 California Street Maintenance Vehicle Parking Dist. Fishing Pier Other Downtown Areas Pier Ave. Sweeping Totals FY 88-89 $ 41,600 22,700 10,800 3,600 $ 78,700 FY 89-90 $ 44,096 24,062 11,340 3,600 $ 83,098 FY 90-91 $ 46,737 25,524 11,880 3,960 $ 88,100 Total $121,708 75,764 11,232 14,040 $222,744 Total $132,432 72,286 34,020 11,160 $249,898 4) Contractor's Performance The service provided in the past by Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. has been good. The contractor has been responsive to the concerns of the City. 5) Level of Service The downtown area receives provided in any other part Street sweeping Pier Avenue sweeping Litter pick up A complete beakdown of the contract. a higher level of service than that of the City. For example: Downtown Area 5 x a week 3 x a week 7 x a week City 1 x a week 1 x a week as needed level of service is listed in the 3 a. 6) Fiscal Impact: No additional funds for FY 87-88 are necessary. Budgeting $71,386 for FY 88-89 is required for this contract. The potential funding sources are as follows: Funding Source: General Fund $39,886 Parking Fund 31,500 Total FY 88-89 $71,386 This amount will be reflected in the FY 88-89 budget request. 7) Summary Based on lower cost and past performance, staff recommends the contract be awarded to Specialty Maintenance Company, Inc. This contract may be terminated by the City at any time, for whatever reason, by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Contractor (see page 3 of Contract). Alternative: An alternative to City Council is: 1. Modify the scope of work. 2. Reject all bids and rebid. Respectfully Submitted Anrelny Antich Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator award/1 :mv 4 Concur: evin B. Northc✓raft City Manager DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE SCOPE OF WORK VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT Work includes: Power Sweeping: (including streets, gutters at sidewalks, and parking lots A, B, C, and The Strand from 10th Street to 14th Street, hand sweeping downtown area sidewalks, trach barrel pick up and litter pick up. FISHING PIER Work includes: Work includes trash barrel pick up (emptying & re -lining), litter pick up, restroom maintenance (hosing down, sanitizing and re -stocking), clearing sink plugs, hosing and scrubbing pier deck and edges, cutting boards, and benches. OTHER DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE Work includes: Litter pick up (sand lot, parking lot E, Biltmore site, Strand & Jarvis Memorial Bike Rest), power sweeping The Strand between 14th Street and 15th Street and parking lot E, hand sweeping, watering plants/weeding and hosing down the Jarvis Memorial Bike rest. PIER AVENUE BETWEEN PALM DRIVE AND VALLEY DRIVE Work includes: Power sweeping and litter pick up in tree wells, streets, gutters, planter areas and sidewalks. awsum/1 1 May 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 10, 1988 INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING PLACEMENT OF A KIOSK AT THE HERMOSA PIERBEAD Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the attached report regarding placement of a kiosk at the Hermosa Beach pierhead. Background: The attached memo was supplied the City Council at the January 12, 1988 meeting. Council directed the matter be referred to the Chamber of Commerce to inquire if they would wish to participate. At the April 12, 1988 meeting, Councilmember Rosenberger request- ed the matter be put back on the agenda following a meeting with the Chamber of Commerce Director. Analysis: I have discussed the concept of an informational kiosk at the pierhead with Chamber Executive Vice President Bill Fowler. The Chamber members have discussed the idea, and feel staffing of the kiosk area would be a major problem that they would be unable to assume. Accordingly, they are not prepared to participate with the City on this proposal. Related to staffing, staff is aware of a pilot program being con- ducted nationally using microbased kiosks (see attached April 18, 1988 article from Nation's Cities Weekly). This concept would eliminate the need for staffing a kiosk, but no doubt set up costs would be considerable. Climate control for the electronic equipment in an outdoor location would also be an obstacle, but staff will monitor this pilot program to see if it has any future applicability to us. )Z Z1;404( 'Kevin B. North raft City Manager 'KBN/1d lh EXCERPT FROM 1112i88 COUNCIL MINUTES (b) Informational report regarding placement of a Kiosk at the Hermosa pierhead. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian dated January 5, 1988. Action: To refer to the Chamber of Commerce for analy- sis and input regarding their decision as to whether they would wish to participate. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. January 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of January 12, 1988 of the City Council RECOMMENDATION KIOSK INFORMATION CENTER It is recommended City Council receive and file this report and to direct staff as to what further steps to take regarding this project. BACKGROUND Staff has been directed by the City Council to study the feasibility of installing a kiosk at the foot of Pier Avenue. As part of staff's research, the City of Redondo Beach was contacted as a possible source of information as they have a kiosk located in that City. ANALYSIS Presently, staff is still researching this project. However, some information has been gathered and staff felt the City Council may want to be apprised of the situation so far and decide if staff should continue with this. It appears at this time, the Redondo Beach kiosk is still being used and the Riviera Merchants Association is responsible for the kiosk which is located in the Riviera Village. The Redondo Beach kiosk was inspected by Public Works Director Antich and Public Safety Director Wisniewski and they found the kiosk to be an old structure, attached to a permanent foundation. The feasibility of Hermosa Beach purchasing this structure and/or the City of Redondo Beach wanting to sell it .is rather remote. It is estimated by our staff it would cost more to move the Redondo Beach kiosk than it is worth. However, the contact person for the kiosk who is with the Riviera Merchants Association will not be able to talk with us until the beginning of the second week in January. Should Hermosa Beach consider either purchasing or building its own kiosk? 9b Perhaps, City Council may want to discuss this matter further before staff devotes any more time to this project. One primary concern is the on-going staffing for the structure_ Would the Chamber of Commerce be interested in participating in this endeavor and to what extent. There are many more construction concerns that will need to be addressed if the City Council wishes to pursue this further. ur: ayle . Martin Inter City Manager cc: Public Works Director Public Safety Director Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian Assistant City Manager l' Tech by Lynn Mundell Public Technology Incorporated is cur- rently involved in an innovative telecom- munications pilot project created in con- junction with IBM and nine other PTI member jurisdictions. The system is be- ing tested in the city of Charlotte, N.C., while the microbased kiosk is being tested in Kansas City, Mo. and in the county of Hillsborough, Fla. A pilot project with two technologies, the kiosk and voicemail, stem from a joint partnership between P11, IBM and local government in which the parties involved hope to discover what is needed from technologies for local government. Charlotte's voicemail system uses Rolm Phonedial to store messages from selected departments that callers from access front their telephones. The second technology is being tested in Kansas City and Hillsborough County. It is a microcomputer with a touchscreen and a videodisk player. Three of these systems will be set up in kiosks The project is referred to as "The 24 - Hour City Hall," because it allows citi- zens access to local government informa- tion when city or county offices are dosed. Weekly updates on city council issues, complaints directed to specific of- fices and a list of bus schedules are just a small sampling of what the information centers have the capability of doing. • Ihtpilot project was begun in am - Junction with IBM, PTI, and PTI's 'Iele- communkations Advisory Commitee (T/1[). Formed in December, 1986, TAC is composed of a group of nine jurisdk- ' fiats: Arlington County, Va.; Tallahas- see, Fla.; San Jose, Ca.; Kansas City, Mo.; Dade County, Fla.; Charlotte, N.C.; Dal- las, Tx.; Hillsbourough County, Fia. and Chicago, in. The TAC was the pool from which the test sites were chosen, with the cities and counties entering proposals which were judged by both PTI and IBM. The jurisdictions which were not chosen as test sites are serving now as expert advisors to the pilot sites. Barbara Shinrodc► marketing supper representative in IBM Public Sector In- dustry Marketing manages. the IBM side of the project. "We feel that the partner- ship between BM, PTI and local govern- ment officials is the cornerstone of the success of this project. Each party brings unique knowledge and resources in the use of technology, which we hope will combine to.improve citizen access to lo- cal government information . and ser- vice," Shinrock said. 'IBM is anidous to understand how current technology in conjunction with innovative applications solutions can im- prove service delivery for local govern- ments, and at the same time give direc- • tion to IBM's future development in meeting the needs of local governments. in my meetings with the TAC and pilot site staff, rve been very impressed byhthdr enthusiasnt and aeativlty and their openmindedness toward lnnova .1. tion," Shinrod< said. Fras►de .Gilman,• research associate with.Plrand project manager otThe 24- ' tWtrnatyHaa, has ban.involved with .116stinefect froat.the it.. :. • . . "The idea for this grew out of the partnership with IBM, TAC and PTI. We all had interests in the marketing section of state and local governments." When gtiesfoned about how the proj- ect was conceived, Gilman explained, "Local governments are 'applications - driven; which means that just because a fancy new technology exists, doesn't mean that a local government will buy it. Local governments have resource and legal restrictions. "One of the most important concepts conveyed by the TAC to IBM is that local government tedufolgy operations are applications driven. "They respond to local govenment pri- orities and programs. This was a break- through point with IBM, and forms the basis for The 24 -Hour City Hall. The fancy kiosk and voicemail system are great, but only insofar as they advance the communications and information." Allan Stern, TAC member and director of management information service in Boston, said, "MIS (Management In- formation Services) should focus on cont- munication issues that address the needs of the government as well as those of the public -at -large. We have to come out of the closet: these systems are invaluable in treating issues that affect the public— as a matter of fact, it is probably their most valuable use." The Kiosk The kiosk and voicemail share some sped& attributes in helping with prob- lems facing dtizens: "Geographic and time barriers are there for people who work far away from city hall and cannot get there before they dose. Things such as busy signals and getting cut off are things citizens don't need," said Clinton. "Both technologies can offer the same sources and information. The obvious difference is that one is visually based, while the other is aural. However, this is not a test of the effectiveness of one technology over the other. This project allows the jurisdiction to choose how they want to enhance information deliv- ery to their citizens." Other options for information or ser- vices given out by both the kiosk and voicemail include the ones mentioned above: bus schedules, complaints, and tY Hall swered or given as far as information is only partially limited by what could be created technologically. The kiosk is different from the voicemail though: "A software package that combines touch screen, voice syn- thesis, graphics and full -motion video" is how the project is described by PTI's literature on this new program. It was dedded in both the Kansas City and Hillsborough areas that the two ki- osks would be placed in shopping malls. Any surprise at the choice of shopping malls for sites can be quickly dismissed; they are places that many people go to, they are guarded, and they are at tem- perature control, something which is im- portant to the delicate machines. Each kiosk will feature a menu of op- tions that are available for the user, or citizen. "What IBM and the committee wanted was for the jurisdictions to have a top priority for more effectively inform- ing their dtizens on dty and county events, as well as accepting information from them in tum," said Gilman. Sandra Charbonier, Citizen Action Center manager, is the coordinator for. the project in Hillsborough County, Fla. "Right now we are still developing it, trying to identify information categories and looking for sites and kiosk designers. We are Looking at malls. The type of information we are interested in provid- ing incudes: parks and recreation, muse- as te;u cooperative extension services, road work and currents events such as fairs." Mamie Hammes, of the Kansas Qty BCenter, and liaison usiness the dty of ?Cansas, predicts the next few months will be "a lot of fun" in the planning of how to develop their kiosks. Kansas Qty has two kiosks that it will be working with. So far their plans in - dude the placement of one in the north- west end of the dty and one ht the southeast carnes Hammer, stated that approximately 55,000 phone calls of inquiry go to the Action Center per year, not inducting the general ats. that do not go to apedfic "Kansas Qvery ty is are more than square miles here, we coves three counties and a little bit of a fourth, you have to drive 70-80 miles in order to be able to go through the and have a major water -way "We are progressing on a couple of different levels. First. of all we are trying to work on the questions dozens have regarding the dty hall operations and services, as IBM works on the software. We are looking at pladng two kiosks in shopping malls farther away from the city hall in order to help those people who live in the suburbs," Hammer said. Hammer cited as an example that K a had discovered some potholes, they can leave that complaint at the in the malt 'there needs to be ' time interaction,' so that the carrcollecg complaints and answer • dtizen dty council news are handl thened, as well as kiosk the acceptance of complaints to city gov- some ernment about services, accurate taxi fare city amounts, information and schedules of hotels, bus routes and local events, and • - -,,e ming up of people for classes. The lin Hall ;,of .possibilities_. to what .. could, be an.. • ultimate me of the k os or 'City f. In the Malt=e_s wee oat it has,* ta, j - See & aoti ;; City Hall fes, p., ave the dtizen a trip. A secondary ra- son.7et sd l important, is to even out and perhaps h decease the work flow for our "Some of the things that we want peo. p1. 10 be able *0 do is to have a 1ace to turn to for help, jnformadon on how to go places, calendars of upcoming events, news on parks and reaeatian events, as well as general government information and and " said - am er. • He emphasized is still in the that construction ing stage. 'IBM has told us that the dtizen should be able to do this (get information and:l 1p) in three steps a VSs. If there . are map steps than that they will lose. ince est --it would be too frustrating to go through five to its menus to get a single bus sdmedule. "Vie are even thinking about getting together some videos. In between the dotes that people are using the kboiks wee somethktg that could go along with in- formatlo n on the screen." "IBM has given us the oppditunity here to dream. Whatever is not possible they can inform us about, but we really have the potential to be visionaries here. We are not just looking at what will be good for our dries, but.we are also think- ing in terms of whattother dries would. . have needed if they had lead this oppor- tunity. 'For example, what would email does and what would medium-sized does need in the kiosk?" said Hammer, emphasizing that even though the pilot project is taking place in their town, the neults will affect all munidpalities in- trigued by the potential for technology and their citizens.. . The Rolm PhoneMail system Charlotte, N.C. was receiving a total of approximately 130,000 calls per day, so • they wanted to offer their citizens an electronic mail service. For their situation the phage system will kbeed something that will attractpec t „ was a natural choice. The dty specifically . l would slmow «; .walshl6ao cm down on the me • i a aR aometh"'6 b were ipen�lg time that a qd Abe themes we hire 1n dht.t&y— the phone;$ Wei u degree°f to toriabet:Aioewap . . •.Ift video woulfibe iddeed► I sent outs othe people in ail •-• /. .•we �^ 1��Mi7�'�/wwr. —. ���..�--..J '.� • . *ISA 1:'s31i.afrriw0w1.rrrlr • • 'Of tjie.diRarent dty departments concern- ing the new polect and 1 was amazed at the resposises,. Everyone had an idea of what should 'be addressed .throughthe phone system," said Mike Long,.energy- telecommunicadons manager for the City of Charlotte. According to Long, the phone system has the potential to give out up to 100 . phone who n � need answes. For e em- ple, if someone needs an answer con- ; cog aspedfic department, or would like to leave a message, they can dial the correct department through a menu, then they will be l another for Thether phone systeem is ' informa capable of storing and forwarding mes- ze The PhoneMall system will be on to address doers' comments and coin--' plaints during or, hour4,and also when • the lines are badged up during nonmai , hours and a receptionist or other em- ployee is not available to take the X11. ' �psy� �,� nreadY eogo !rP. • More ration �em/The. Cit► Hall --project be bta 2 .: PTI's•.iaraAde.:. �. .boon. „G lfpean. at 202-626-__ 2432.•0• ,•_,:' • a:, f May 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 10, 1988 INFORMATIONAL REPORT AND UPDATE ON THE RECENT OIL SPILL FROM THE STINNETT PROPERTIES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report., BACKGROUND: On March 24, an oil spill occurred at the property belonging to Stinnett Oil Company. Approximately 40 barrels of oil escaped from the property at 617 Cypress Avenue and flowed into the streets. City personnel responded and worked to restrict the escaping oil from entering into the sewer system. Following the spill, various state and federal agencies were notified. The Environmental Protection Agency responded to inspect the site of the spill as well as an addi- tional site belonging to the oil company. Currently, the site of the spill is undergoing major clean-up activities. The other company site located at 612 1st Street is also being cleaned up. Stinnett Oil Company has been notified that oil production cannot be resumed until the sites are properly cleaned up to minimum standards and inspected, and they have properly installed new containment walls and holding tanks. A brief report from Captain Chesson of the Fire Department and the inspection reports from the EPA are attached for your review. evin B. Northcr ft, City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Director of Public Safety Recovery of City costs as a result of the spill will be coordinated by the Fire Department. 1i CITU OF H ERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO. DATE Wisniewski, Director of Public DATEMay 1, 1988 Safety SUBJECT.Update-Stinnett Oil Spill ROWCaptain Chesson, Fire Department The Fire Department has been keeping a close watch over the cleanup. Of;:the Stinnett site. The cleanup 1 -is progressed as of this date to the point that risk of fire has been eliminated. Most of the standing surface oil has been removed and all tanks have either been removed or are in the process of being removed. We have notified all appropriate State, County, and Federal agencies to insure that the site is cleaned up to provide an environmentally safe condition. Agencies that responded are The Environmental Protection Agency, The Los Angeles County Health Department, the California Division of Oil and Gas, The United States Coast Guard, and the California Regional Water Quality Board. Each agency has and will be checking on the cleanup process to ensure that before any oil production is resumed that the site meets all acceptable minimum standards for ground contamination and that all equipment is properly installed including containment walls. I have also enclosed a copy of a report from Ecology and Environment, Inc. They are the company contracted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency to investigate the spill and cleanup. c. In conclusion, the clean up is more -less out of our hands and is being monitored by the various agencies mentioned above. I am attempting as much as possible to keep up on the progress. I have notified Mr. Stinnett by certified mail that he may not resume oil production until he provides the Fire Department with written veri- fication that both sites have met minimum clean up standards and that all new tanks, containment walls, etc., are properly installed before we will issue m a new permit to operate the oil facilities within the City. . ecology and environment, inc. 717 W. TEMPLE ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012, TEL. 213-481-3870 International Specialists in the Environment Hermosa Beach Fire Dent Captain Chesson 540 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Captain Chesson: April 14, 1988 Enclosed please find copies of the two inspection reports resulting from our visit to the two Stinnett Oil facilities in your city earlier this month. The U.S. EPA will be in contact with the Stinnett Oil Company regarding the status and requirements for compliance with the Clean Water Act regulations at those two facilities. Thank you for your assistance in these matters, and please let us know if we can be of further assistance to you. Sincere rcus . . EPA Technical Assistance Team Member recycled paper SPILL PREVENTION CONTRCL AND OOUNTEFd4EASURE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT SPCC Case # 88-006 Facility Name Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Toxics & Waste Management Division Emergency Response Section Date of Inspection 4/7/88 Facility Location California Inspector L. Marcus/R. Randall Stinnett Oil Company - 6th & Cypress Facility 617 Cypress Avenue Hermosa Beach (street) 90254 (state) Individual (s) Contacted Roy Stinnett (name) Rose Marie Stinnett (name) (city) Los Angeles (zip) a (county) Owner (213) 377-7142 (title) Business Manager (title) (telephone #) (213) 377-7142 (telephone #) Facility Owner/Parent Corporation Stinnett Oil Company Owner/Parent Address California 9 Caballeros Road (street) 90274 Rolling Hills (state) Inspection Initiation Findings A. (zip) (city) (213) 377-7142 (telephone #) Routine Surveillance Spill Report EPA Request ,�_ Referral Facility not subject to regulations because: insufficient storage no reasonable spill expectation Facility in compliance with regulations. Facility in violation of regulations because: X Vl SPCC Plan not available for inspection. V2 SPCC Plan not adequate. V3 SPCC Plan not fully implemented. X V4 Source(s) not in compliance with SPCC requirements. FACILITY OBSERVATION REPORT SPCC Case # 88-006 Facility Name Stinnett Oil Company 1. Facility Description a. Type of business/operation Crude oil production b. Facility Oil Storage 4 x 500 bbl crude 1 x 250 bbl crude prevention measures provided complete block wall secondary containment: inadequate construc- tion (see p.3 comments) • c. Loading/Off Loading Area ground-based loading valve none d. Appearance of facility (housekeeping, evidence of spillage) Very poor: pooled oil exists within secondary containment and on compound grounds from recent spill. / 2. SPCC Plan X Not Available Available and Adequate Available but Inadequate: No Training Not Certified No Mgrnt Approval No Emergency Numbers No Review No Amendment for Modifications Not Implemented Conin ents: 7y • .� An API Handout was distributed. 1 V Z VI - 2 SPCC Case # 88-006 Facility Name Stinnett Oil Company 3. Receiving Water (in the event of a spill): None present a. Name and/or description Pacific Ocean (King Harbor) 4, IL__ Perennial _ Intermittent Water present at time of inspection Inspector traced potential discharge to receiving water Receiving water identified by facility representative Receiving water identified from topographical maps Receiving water identified by other means: Los Angeles County Flood Control District b. Probable flow path to receiving water: 30 feet east on land to gutter on Cypress Avenue. 80 feet south on Cypress to 6th Street intersection, enter storm drain on north corner of 6th Street. through storm drain approximately 1 mile to receiving water discharge point. COMMENTS: This is an unmanned facility, fed by 1 well on-site and one off- site. Inspection request was prompted by a spill that occurred on 3/24/88. 40 bbl of oil was recovered off-site. however. the facility has not yet been cleaned up. Mr. Stinnett intends on cleaning the site and resumino pperation. Portions of the secondary containment walls appear structurally unsound due to inadequate grouting. apparently acgravating the earlier spill conditions. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE 4-8-88 Attachments: _X__ Photographs _ Maps x.. Field Drawings _Add'l Comments 3 Spill Prevention Control find Countermeasure Compliance Inspection Report Photographs SPCC Case # 88-006 Facility: Stinnett Oil Company 40 View inside the south tank group, facing north. Note pooled oil. Date: 04-01-88 Photographer: E. Vander Velde Center of the compound and north tank group, facing west. Note well in the background; tank in the picture failed causing the most recent spill. Photographer: L. Marcus Date: 04-07-88 Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Compliance Inspection Report Photographs $PCC Case * 88-006 Facility: Stinnett Oil Company Oil loading pipe. Photographer: L. Marcus Date: 04-07-88 Outside wall at south-east corner of facility, facing north. Note oil stainage from most recent spill. Photographer: E. Vander Velde Date: 04-01-88 .d Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Compliance Inspection Report Photographs SPCC Case # 88-006 Facility: Stinnett Oil Company View of faciity from the rear, facing north. Rear left tank failed resulting in spill on 3/24/88. Photographer: L. Marcus Date: 04-07-88 upslope block wall containment flat block wall con loading pipe gate route of 3/24/88 spill flat sidewalk 6th Street Cypress Ave. 50 feet to storm drain on 6th St. Stinntet Oil Company drawing not th 6 & Cypress Facility to scale 617 Cypress Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 recy;,ied paper r+•t•Iugb and rmirut,mrnt . SPCC Case # 88-007 Facility Name Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Toxics & Waste Management Division Emergency Response Section Date of Inspection 4/7/88 Inspector L. Marcus/R. Randall Facility Location California Stinnett Oil Company - 1st Street Facility 612 1st Street Hermosa Beach (street) 90254 (state) Individual (s) Contacted Roy Stinnett (name) Rose Marie Stinnett (zip) Owner (city) Los Angeles (county) (213) 377-7142 (name) (title) Business Manager (title) Facility Owner/Parent Corporation Owner/Parent Address California (telephone #) (213) 377-7142 (telephone #) Stinnett Oil Coripany 9 Caballeros Road (street) 90274 Rolling,Hills (city) (213) 377-7142 (state) Inspection Initiation (zip) (telephone #) Routine Surveillance Spill Report EPA Request_ Referral Findings A. Facility not subject to regulations because: • insufficient storage no reasonable spill expectation B. Facility in compliance with regulations. ._X C. Facility in violation of regulations because: V1 SPCC Plan not available for inspection. V2 SPCC Plan not adequate. V3 SPCC Plan not fully implemented. V4 Source(s) not in compliance with SPCC reccuirements. FACILITY OBSERVATION REPORT SPCC Case # 88-007 Facility Name Stinnett 011 Company 1. Facility Description a. Type of business/operation Crude oil production b. Facility Oil Storage 1 x 250 bbl crude Prevention measures provided incomplete block wall secondary containment (see p.3 comments) c. Loading/Off Loading Area direct tank -valve discharge within incomplete secondary containment wall d. Appearance of facility (housekeeping, evidence of spillage) Appearance good: limited evidence of minor spillage 2. SPCC Plan X Not Available Available and Adequate Available but Inadequate: No Training Not Certified No Mgmt Approval No Emergency Numbers No Review No Amendment for Modifications Not Implemented Continents: gpCC plan reqpirements were discussed with Mrs. Stinnett. An API Handout was distributed. SPCC Case # 88-007 Facility Name Stinnett Oil Canpany 3. Receiving Water (in the event of a spill): None present a. Name and/or description Pacific Ocean (King Harbor) X._. Perennial Intermittent __ Water present at time of inspection Inspector traced potential discharge to receiving water Receiving water identified by facility representative Receiving water identified from topographical naps Receiving water identified by other means: Los Angeles County Flood Control District b. Probable flow path to receiving water: 50 feet north on land to 1st Street. 150 feet west in gutter to storm drain. 1/2 mile to receiving water discharge point. COMMENTS: The facility is unmanned and is fed by one on-site well. A second storage tank at the facility is not in use. There is currently no pastern wall belonging to the secondary containment enclosure. INSPECT'OR'S SIGNATUREDNTE 4-8-88 Attachments: Photogr hs _ Maps _X Field Drawings Add'1 Comments 3 Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Compliance Inspection Report Photographs SPCC Case# 88-007 Facility: Stinnett Oil Company View of the facility, facing east. Tank on the right side is not in use; there is currently no east side to the containment wall. Photographer: L. Marcus Date: 04-01-88 1MUMMY St Street to storm drain well block wall flow path block wall wall missing Stinnett Oil Company drawing not 1st Street Facility to scale 612 1st Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 �e:ycie� paper esand tmirrmmr•ns 1 April 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR BICYCLE PATH REPAIR CIP 87-165 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign a Contract with Neff Contracting for bicycle path wall repairs at a cost not to exceed $13,178. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. 3. Transfer $3,412 from the General Fund, designation for capital improvements, to CIP 87-165. Background: At the April 12, 1988 City Council meeting Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 87-165. This project involves removing and replacing deteriorated portions of the existing concrete wall adjacent to the bicycle path on the west side of Hermosa Avenue from 35th Street to 29th Court. The project was publicly advertised for two weeks. Thirteen contractors received bid packages. Analysis: Four sealed bids were received by the City Clerk on April 28, 1988. These bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bids were as follows: Neff Contracting Corporation* Damon Construction Company Ryco Construction Company Excel Paving Company The Engineer's estimate was: $11,980 14,653 32,670 44,412 $10,573 * J. T. Garza bid under the name of Neff Contracting Corporation. lk Five references were called to determine the low bidder's qualifications. The references indicated that Neff Contracting is capable of doing this type of work, finishing on schedule, within budget and producing quality work. Neff Contracting has a valid Class C General Contractor's License (No. 485157) with the State of California. Fiscal Impact: CIP 87-165 Budgeted Amount $ 9,766 Proposed Contract Amount $13,178 Additional Funds Required $3,412 An additional $3,412 is required to complete the project. This project will span two fiscal years (FY 87-88 and FY 88-89). Based on the progress payment schedule additional funds are necessary during the current fiscal year. Any additional funding necessary to complete the project will be reflected in the FY 88-89 budget. 114/ General Fund designated for Capital Improvements: Existing balance Funds transferred to CIP 87-165 $243,165 <3,412> New Balance $239,753 The existing funds of $9,766 are restricted and can be bikeway improvements only. The funding is provided by Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Senate Bill $4,897 in FY 86-87 and $4,869 in FY 87-88. Alternatives: 1. Reject the low bidder. 2. Rebid the project. 3. Modify the scope of work. 4. Drop the subject. Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengler " Assistant Engineer Concur: "Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager BWG/umv 2 Concur: used for the 821, allocating ny Antich Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: ‘24C62101d4.414C,1 Viki Copeland Finance Administrator ern( OF HERMOSA LEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM •FY86-87 THROUGH FY88-89 PROJECT NAME: Hermosa Beach Miscellaneous Bikeway Constm- EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT NUMBER: CIP 87-165 • ACCOUNT NUMBER: 115-401-8165-4201 PROGRAM AREA: Street & Safety Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This CIP provides for: Preliminary engineering leading to construction - Right-of-way acquisition - Construction and reconstruction - Repair and maintenance (off-street bikeways only) - Purchase and installation of features such as benches drinking fountains, changing rooms, and bicycle racks. COST ELEMENTS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 'ADOPTEDIFY 85-861EXPECTEDI 1 1 I TOTAL 1 FY 85-86 EXPENDED TIIRU FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89. PROJECT BUDGET 102/28/86106/30/861 1 1 'I COST1 1 PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY TOTAL 1 1 1 •I 1 1 I---.----I--------I--------I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. 1- I - -------I I I I I I I I I 1 1- 91.766 I --------I- 91.766-1 FUNDING SOURCES Grant Fund (1) E • jr_a.4s-flnsL_L21 • TOTAL I--1- I ... I I 9,766 1 1 1 1 1-9-266-1 1 1 9,766 1 FUNDING IDISTRIBUTION 1 1 1 TOTAL i.•• I 1 1 t 4,897 I 1 4,897 1 I I I 1-4.162-1 1- 4 Li62-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9,766 9,766 (1) TDA Article 3 (S8 821) FY86-87 Allocation (2) TDA Article 3 (S8 821) FY87-88 Allocation - 1 - CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE d ,1 n PROJECT NAME s C 1 P A 7-1()5 l 1CYcz E PAtn REPAIRS ACCOUNT NUMBER : LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE s sus swi s+n s, o ACTUAL SCHEDULE : mmommemommes X s 1009E COMPLETE 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1—�---- I 1 I Final design approval before advertising for construction ) 1 1 Prepare advertisement & set bid opening) 11111111 1 I I I 1 1 1 date w^ I 1 1 1 1. - I 1 1 1 1 I 1 Advertising period 111111 (issue addendums as necessary) 1 1 1 1 �I,- —1 1 1 1 1 1 I. Accept sealed bids & public bid opening 1 1 1 1 III ----1 1 1 1 1 1 I Review bids 71111 • 1 1 I 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Award contract 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sign contract 111 • (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Preconstruction meeting procedure 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-6----1 1 1 1 1 1 Issue "Notice to Proceed" 111 1 I 1 1 1 I��������� 1 I 1 1 1 1 Construction Period 1 1 1 1 1 ImilsIma 1 ' 1 1 I' 1 1 Monitor progress & maintain records 1 I 1 • 1 1 1------`------I 1 1 1 1 1 ' Progress payment and iss ssssssss • change order procedure • 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1111 I 1 1 1 I Acceptance of work as complete 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Issusing and recording a 111 "Notice of Completion" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I Retention Payment • Project close ,out I• 1 1 I 1 1 1 si�s�i����l�� I 1 I 1 1 • I I I I I I I I 1 I I I• ;f•-• • -1 May 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermos Beach City Council May 10, 1988 ACCEPT WORK AS COMPLETE KELLY TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING CIP 87-507 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete CIP 87-507, Kelly Tennis Courts Resurfacing performed by Richard Zaino. 2. Authorize staff to a) Release the 10% retention payment to Richard Zaino. b) Release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond to Richard Zaino. c) File a Notice of Completion. Background: On January 12, 1988, the City entered into an agreement with Richard Zaino for the amount of $46,800. The project involved resurfacing the two tennis courts at Clark Field with a new acrylic playing surface and installing a new drinking fountain, retaining wall, fence and wind screens. A Notice to Proceed was issued on February 8, 1988 and work began on February 22, 1988. Analysis: The project was satisfactorily completed on May 2, 1988 in compliance with plans and specifications. One week of rainy weather delayed the completion date, which was scheduled for April 22, 1988. The final cost of the project was $46,800. No change orders were issued. Staff has authorized payment for all but the 10% retention amount of $4,680. Below is a summary of contract cost: Total Contract Cost: $46,800.00 Progress Payment # 1: 26,689.50 Progress Payment # 2*: 15,430.50 Total Retention: $ 4,680.00 * Progress Payment # 2 has not been paid yet. Pending City Council authorization, staff will release the 107 retention payment after the waiting period and will release Richard Zaino from the obligations of the following Faithful Performance Bond: Bonding Company: Address: Amwest Surety Insurance Company P.O. Box 4500 Woodland Hills, CA 91365 1 Original Bond Amount: $46,800 Amount to be released: 46,800 Bond No.: 1144221 No preliminary liens have been filed against the City as of May 2, 1988. Pending City Council authorization, staff will record a Notice of Completion. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted Contract Amount Expended Retention Estimated Amount (1) Amount Before Retention(2) Due Balance $56,300.00 46,800.00 42,191.54 4,680.00 9,428.46 (1) Funding Sources: Community Parklands Grant and Park - Recreation Tax Fund (2) Progress Payments # 1 and # 2 Budgeted Estimated Expenditure Balance Amount through 6-30-88 Grant Fund $51,000.00 $46,871.54 $4,128.46 Parks'& Recreational Facility Tax Fund 5,300.00 -0- 5,300.00 $9,428.46 The money from the Community Parklands Grant , FY 87-88, has been applied for but has not been received yet. The project was completed within budget. The excess funds of $9,428.46 can be used for improvements to City parks. Alternatives: 1. Do not accept project as complete. Respectfully submitted, Concur: L Brian Genglet Assistant Engineer Concur: City Manager BWG/umv Attachment: CIP 87-507 Budget Project Schedule 2 ony Ant c Director of Pu'lic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator CITY OF BEACH • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 • SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • • •PROJECT.NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: Clark Field Tennis Court Resurfacing CIP 87-507 150-401-8507-4201 Park Improvements This project proposes to resurface' C1'ark Field tennis courts. • BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 'Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 •Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU TIIRU FY86-87 PROJECT FY86-87 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING I I I I I I I I 0 I I I------- I PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES I I I I CONSTRUCTION I 51,4801 1 51,4801 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I' INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY 51,4801__1_51,4801 4,820 •4,820 TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE 56,300 56,300 FUND NO. FUNDING SOURCES ****************** FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL I I I 1 1 I •I I I 150 Grant Fund (1)1. 51,000 I.51 000 • 125 un (Park Rec Fac Tax Fd1 I I 1 5,3001 1 5,3001 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I TOTAL FUNDING --(1) Camnunity Parklands Grant FY 87-88 56,300 56,300 • CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : KC[.t..Y ower ...5cc,ePXiIJ4;OPg7`567 ACCOUNT NUMBER : /2.6--4-ol - 86-07- ¢Z -DI 1 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : 1101 lemt 11111 este 1101 1 ACTUAL SCHEDULE : arammaxamoicsaa X : 100% COMPLETE '1 w I I I I I I I I I I I I I TASKS 1 JAN 1 FEB I MAR 1 APR 1 MAY 1 JUN 1 JUL 1 AUG 1 11111111 SEP OCT I NOV 1 DEC 1 Final design approval before advertising for construction1 1 I ,,_�.I I I I I I I 1 I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 1111 date 1. 1 1 I 1. - 1 1 1 1 1 111111111 1 Advertising periodIII (issue addendums as necessary) 1 1 1 1 L..........1 1 1 1 .I lali I Accept sealed bids & public bid opening 1 1 1 1 1......--.1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 Review bids 1 1111 I 19881 I I 1 .1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Sign contract 1111. :2(., 1111111 1 I I I I I I 1 I (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) 1 � I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 111111 Award contract Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment end change order procedure Acceptance of *work as complete 1 11111 I 1 1 1 1 I-. 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1(1111111111111111 1 1 1111111111111111111111111111 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 11111 11111111 1111111111111111 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 111111 1 1 1 1 1 Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Retention Payment I. I i I 1 mums! I I I Project close out 1 1---oc-1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1• 6 1 May 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council May 10, 1988 CHILD ABUSE MONTHLY REPORT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council receive and file the attached report. Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 1 Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources 0 0, 0 Q 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 RICH GRAPHICS. HERMOSA BEACH. CALIF. 258766 CF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PURCHASE ORDER DATE 4-11-88 ACCOUNT NUMBER ''001-400-4601-4201 REQUESTED BY Mastrian All Purchases are subject to the conditions printed on the reverse side of this sheet Mail two (2) copies of your invoices - c/o Finance Department, y 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-0299. ; .::••••,-. - ' •y. Y?- This Purchase Order is not valid without authorized signature. PURCHASE • • ORDER NUMBER 4855 DELIVER MERCHANDISE TO 'CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • c/o South Bay Coalition Alive •320 Knob Hill `• Redondo Beach, - CA 8277114?QUA e! f �:. • ta Attn: Mary Castagna ----"-.• evtg ..c, truiliw bell ed lEr,m b_ *(einiut in ,, .1n'^Ret;ett .mierttA t,` -r . •/"1_ .•,fe; k ..* 5, • ... ...`'.p`:s:' •..' .. r:•1,- •k ,• _. Ari.., rranl NO : .t- 4-4:`''''''• i QUANTITY n UNIT • • ,...ZJN 1 bikj'1 uv .Can'b ; _i(t%Idln y" rr,‘TIE3biIliyil ib'7Y(1:JG•.444)" .r etk9L �db4 ,6 4.'41'4'1 - : ' DESCRIPTION , IIITt.. ,.i: •. - UNIT PRICE-.'i..-iTOTAL • n • . ` �.. . t • •a om • ' .; ' , t '..fij •-' • ♦• .• ...e. .. . -nCSuin i.s :to -be ,,paid ;;to .,contractor `•,:paccording � to tvz Article #3 of the attached contract for -'-f t: -services . >i':b eft ''ii e,'!: o',tna l3frarn re3 r' ;oll„ 1 • b c cri , ;•' +... y.. n:.¢2_I`13J1L'•.�'Jf °3Li c . . j"' - .,`itr: :l u. bid fd' :itsQe ersut f+tt s ebb. -n 1Gti mE Z`!?;19%i b .fSti) is See attached report.' ,' � ,r . .e rb.F , . •^t !•o'F?` • : •l:.I:C 4., i..reZ Or•A Oett.Tr4! SO Iliad iobnssVef', bat e e'tbi rei7�et I. �. 44'y . qe,-06.f tirr 'iJ6 i mnt .Nr .ia Y;:4. 1.411: t `I,^.� -city Council approved/August ri; L987 ' �� y... r . . v4;•,` • './ T . •'', : , Ia ,' i . .1 r "...."-,.,• . .. .- 4` �'• . ya •. b . ,.{, .yy��. -• y. N J(: .ie.1' K �',::.7.,-''...;.':1/4-'•a -ii tg•ris—...p vt-,ir: 'e berie ilt t weic.itrf• •06,bider is i' . ti,tttn 1�rc e Stmt] to ; . ., s -.•, t:lr�..eo er![,+.;i;v..tist besivcifvs'G41, Kg9r'a1g. �-a`b' 646.14•44,- , ..7 .l "•b,....• -'i •, a !r: r' 4414" , ._v �cQn .t v.',r, - 5,. :. p ,t a. , ... a :.:. 0 .. ' ..• F • • Ila G 1L°e Jr, -� dr�� �.'. 'A epi et -p x,_ `msl41611 .L - 10,-,..10,,319,1,•,.7.....5,1,..,..,,- 1.•Q., ,, � •Y?,• .4• �',{'%�•- +mak :11V-wir:`,,a '� i tUC,tit'v,., . -� Y•. d•.! Vfc ;.fieA $1, 000.0 0 ;'r - �,, + ; .�` 'F• �r � jv. �ti.. - f. as t;•:•1.I"''4..-.• ._ e. _ w. .:. ::TOTAL r .S1.000.00 here) request this order EPARTMENT HEA N•..r cnt...• 4...-- .-�-.r tias:.`�'3' • �•t s: y. I:hereby certify that this order Is authorized •r •'i• s , r ti . •fry Ivy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This AGREEMENT made this 11th day of'August, 1987 between the South Bay Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence, an independent contractor, hereinafter referred to as the CONTRACTOR and the City of Hermosa Beach, a duly authorized governmental entity, hereinafter referred to as the CITY. ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT Section 1.01. This Agreement shall become effective on September 1, 1987, and shall continue to June 30, 1988. 'ARTICLE 2. ?SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR. ..4•4•414....Z., ... • • . Section 2.01. --CONTRACTOR jgreesto,perform the services specified in the "Description•of Services" attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference herein. • • •".— ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION. Section 3.01. In consideration for the services to be performed by CONTRACTOR, CITY agrees to -pay to CONTRACTOR:ten .. • • thousand dollars $10,000:.. Said amount to be paid in ten .(10) • equal installments. CONTRACTOR will submit to CITY a statement of services performed within twenty (20) days of the prior months service. CITY agrees to pay the amount due to CONTRACTOR for services within fourteen (14) days upon receipt of invoice. • ARTICLE 4. OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR. South Bay Coalition/ ALIVE! Statement April6, 1988 To: City of Hermosa Beach Re: Services performed by the South Bay Coalition/ ALIVE! for the Child Abuse Resource, Education and Prevention Program in contract with the City of Hermosa Beach. Contract Month Seven, March 1-31, 1988. Preparations are well under way for the Community Conference "Beyond Survival: A Journey Through the Healing Process" which will take place in two parts on April 21 and April 22. This Conference is addressed to victims of any type of emotional trauma (including child abuse, divorce, loss of a loved one or painful war experience). Families and friends of the victims, the community at large, and/human service professionals are also invited to participate. This Conference is important and valuable for the South Bay Community especially, in the wake of McMartin and the recovery process that must take place. Several difference modes of expression will be incorporated in the Conference- including drama, music, humor, and exploration of therapeutic issues. Part I, which will be at the Redondo Beach Community Center, will be an original drama depicting the journey towards healing through several "victims"' eyes. This Conference opener will set the tone for Part II by demonstrating the commonality of feelings and responses by victims of any emotional trauma. Part II will be a day filled with presentations, workshops and a Resource Fair. The Conference will be opened and concluded by two very special keynote speakers. Peter Alsop, Ph.D. is a nationally renowned poet, singer and humorist who specializes in gently diffusing the pain of trauma through original music and humor. After Dr. Alsop's presentation, people may attend one of four workshops offered. A box lunch and Resource Fair follow. Program materials from many community agencies will be available, and relevant books, tapes and other materials will be offered for purchase. Another round of workshops will begin the afternoon session. The final Keynote speaker, Christina Crawford, will be introduced by her good friend Dr. Roland Summit. Ms. Crawford, a survivor of both child abuse and a massive stroke, will be introducing her third book. Her message is entitled "Healing Ourselves, Healing our World." Special scholarships for Hermosa practitioners and residents are available through the South Bay Coalition ALIVE! office. This is an Event not to be missed! The Family Violence Council Meeting on March 25 was devoted to issues of Family Law for practitioners. A panel of specialists included Commissioner Abraham Gorenfeld of the Superior Court, Emelie Elias, President of the South Bay Bar Association, and Michael Friedman, Chair of the Family Law Section of the South Bay Bar Association. Panel moderator David Kuroda, senior mediator for the Concilation Court, fielded the many questions from the audience to the speakers. As usual, several practitioners from Hermosa Beach were active participants. Attached to this report are legislative updates regarding child abuse legislative activity in Sacramento. Submitted b Mary Ca`tagna Executive Director South Bay Coalition/ ALIVE! April 6, 1988 TATUS REPORT FOR CA CONSORTIUM OF CHILD ABUSE COUNCILS 2/29/88 IFA A CA A 105 AUTHOR: Chacon TITLE: Pupil counseling services: child abuse LAST AMEND: 1/27/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: Page 1 File 51 • SUMMARY: Specifically provides for the establishment and operation of a school social work pilot program in the Lemon Grove School District for the 1989-90 school year, for the purpose of providing counseling and assistance to pubils in dealing with child abuse and related problems, as specified. Requires that the district report on the implementation and success of the program, to the Superintendent of Public Instriction no later than Octoer 1, 1990. Appropriation. STATUS: 1/28/88 In ASSEMBLY. Read third time. Passed ASSEMBLY. • ••••To SENATE. 558 AUTHOR: TITLE: Hannigan Public social services: child welfare services LAST AMEND: 1/21/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Permits 3 participating counties, selected by State Department of Social Services, on a pilot program basis, to claim, on an annual basis, a prescribed portion of the state' s share of that county's AFDC -FC expenditures in advance if the county shows that it will conduct a program of family reunification and family maintenance services as specified. Fiscal Impact. STATUS: 1/21/88 From ASSEMBLY Committee on APPROPRIATIONS with authors amendments. Read second time and amended. Rereferred to committee. CA A 703 AUTHOR: Allen TITLE: Child custody: appeals LAST AMEND: 2/09/88 HEARING: 3/08/88 COMMITTEE: SJUD CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Requires the appellate courts, as a 4 -year pilot project, to take all steps to assure that any appeal filed on or after January 1, 1989, from such a judgement of the Orange County Superior Court is finally determined within 250 days of the filing notice of appeal. Fiscal committee. 02/29/88 STATUS: 2/09/88 Page 2 File 51 From SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY with authors amendments. Read second time and amended. Rereferred to committee. CA A 1241 AUTHOR: Waters N TITLE: Child abuse LAST AMEND: 2/01/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: CA A SUMMARY: Provide that "child abuse" does not include an injury caused by reasonable and necessary force used by a peace officer in order to quell a disturbance threatning physical injury or property damage, to prevent physical injury to person or ' damage to property, for self-defence, to obtain weapons or other dangeours objects, or to apprehend an eescapee. Makes other provisions. STATUS: 2/24/88 From SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY: Do pass. 1421 AUTHOR: Filante TITLE: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome LAST AMEND: 1/14/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Creates the AIDS Research Trust Board with specified powers, responsibilities, and members for the purpose of making grants to qualified organizations for research on AIDS. Requires grant recipients to pay back to the state 55% of their grant, plus interest as specified, under certain circumstances. Requires the board to make an annual report to the Legislature, and would authorize the Franchise Tax Board to act as agent for receipt of contributions. Appropriations. STATUS: 1/14/88 From SENATE Committee on REVENUE AND TAXATION with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee. CA A 1518 AUTHOR: Seastrand TITLE: Child abuse report disclosure: hospital scan teams LAST AMEND: 1/25/88 HEARING: 3/15/88 COMMITTEE: SJUD CLIENT COMMENTS: 02/29/88 CA A CA A Page 3 File 51 SUMMARY:• Provides for the confidentiality of reports of child abuse, but authorizes their disclosure to specified persons or agencies, including a hospital scan team. Revises the definition of hospital scan team by providing that the team consist of licensed physicians and surgeons and health care professionals approved for appointment to the team by a properly constituted authority. STATUS: 2/04/88 To SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY. 1549 AUTHOR: TITLE: Waters N Dependent children LAST AMEND: 2/03/88 HEARING: 3/08/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: COMMITTEE: SJUD SUMMARY: Provides that family reunification services shall not be provided to or arranged for a parent of a minor child adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile court or with regard to whom a petition has been filed to have him or her so adjudged, if either that parent is a defendant in a pending criminal child abuse case or a restraining order has been issued by a court to protect the child which restrains that parent from contactwith the child. STATUS: 2/12/88 Withdrawn from SENATE Committee on HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. To SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY. 1833 AUTHOR: TITLE: Waters N Child abuse prevention coordinating councils LAST AMEND: 1/12/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Requires each county to establish councils to coordinate community efforts to prevent and to respond to child abuse, and requires each county to provide funding for the establishment of these councils through funding for the establishment of these councils through county children's trust funds, or if one has not been established in each county, to seek funding from the State Children's Trust Fund. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/04/88 To SENATE Committee on HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. CA A 2033 AUTHOR: Clute TITLE: Pregnant and parenting teens 02/29/68 CA A CA A Page 4 File 51 LAST AMEND: 1/21/88 HEARING: 3/02/88 COMMITTEE: SED CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to give the awarding of new funds for school districts, consortiums of school districts, or county superintendent of schools, to the extend the districts or superintendents have a plan, approved by the Superintendent of Public Insturction in accordance with specified criteria and standards, for coordinaation of progrms serving preganant and aprenting teens. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/04/88 To SENATE Committee on EDUCATION. 2206 AUTHOR: TITLE: Friedman Victims LAST AMEND: 5/28/87 HEARING: 3/01/88 COMMITTEE: SJUD CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Provides that whenever a minor under the age of 18 years testifies in any criminal proceeding involving certain offenses, the court shall issue a protective order which to the extent permitted by law, prohibits court personnel, the prosecutor, the defense counsel and witnesses or any other participants from revealing in any manner the surname, the address or current school of the minor, or the names of the nimor's parents, siblings or any other members of his or her family. STATUS: 8/20/87 In SENATE. Joint Rule 61 suspended. 2436 AUTHOR: Quackenbush TITLE: Children: adoption: child abuse LAST AMEND: 5/26/87 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Requires the State Department of Social Services or a licensed public or private adoption agency to check the child abuse registry maintained by the Department of Justice prior to recommending approval of an application or petition for adoption. Fiscal impact. STATUS: ,02/29/88 CA A CA A CA A Page 5 File 51 6/29/87 To SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY. 2698 AUTHOR: TITLE: Speier Family law: mediation HEARING: 4/06/88 COMMITTEE: AJUD CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Provides that in any custody or visitation proceeding involving a history of domestic violence, or child abuse or where an application has been made, but not yet adjudicated, or an order has been issued pursuant to specified provisions which provide for enjoining specified behavior, upon motion of either party, the court may either order that the matter not be set for mediation or that parties shall meet with mediator separately. STATUS: 1/15/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on JUDICIARY. 2811 AUTHOR: TITLE: Stirling Victims of crime HEARING: 2/29/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: COMMITTEE: APS SUMMARY: Excludes for the definition of "victim" any person who is convicted of a crime in which that person acted in concert with another, and is also the victim of a crime committed by the person with whom he or she acted in concert. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/01/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY. 2823 AUTHOR: TITLE: Longshore Child abuse and neglect CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Makes provisions that information may be disclosed to persons who are trained and qualified to serve on the multidisciplinary personnel teams whether or not those persons are serving on such a team. STATUS: • 2/01/88 To ASSEMBLY.Committee on HUMAN SERVICES. CA A 2850 AUTHOR: Calderon TITLE: Victims of crime 02/29/88 Page 6 File 51 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Creates within state government the Victim Service Board, and provides that the new board rather than the State Board of Control, shall administer the revised law authorizing the idemnification of victims of crimes or of a private citizen who incurs personal injury or death or damage to his or her property under the circumstances described. Makes corresponding changes in existing law. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/01/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY. CA A 3022 AUTHOR: Waters N TITLE: Child abuse and neglect: reporting CA A CA A CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Makes technical and conforming changes in the law; relating to specified persons to report known or reasonable suspected cases of child abuse. STATUS: 2/12/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY. 3139 AUTHOR: TITLE: Leslie Foster care services CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Specifies that the educational requirement for a social worker is either a foster family agency or a group home shall be a master's degree from an accredited graduate school in social work or social welfare. marriage, family, ad child counseling, child psychology. child development, counseling psychology, social psychology, or equivalent education and experience, as determined by the State Department of Social Services. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/12/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on HUMAN SERVICES. 3279 AUTHOR: TITLE: Filante 'Minors: hearsay evidence CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Provides that if a defendant is charged with certain sexual crimes or physical abuse or battery against a minor. and the victim is under the age of 11, an out-of-court statement of the victim may be admitted in specified circumstances. STATUS: 02/29/88 Page 7 File 51 2/18/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY. • CA A 3352 AUTHOR: Bader TITLE: Child abuse reporting: records CA A CA A CA A CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Authorizes the disclosure of reports of child abuse to protective agencies when an individual has applied for employment or volunteer duties which involve investigation or performance of child welfare activities. STATUS: • 2/22/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY. 3444 AUTHOR: TITLE: O'Connell Crimes: domestic violence shelters: disclosure CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Provides that any person who maliciously, and with the intent to obstruct justice or the due administration of the law, discloses the location of any domestic violence shelter, without the authorization of that shelter, is guilty of a. misdemeanor, thereby creating a new crime. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/16/88 INTRODUCED. 3525 AUTHOR: TITLE: Mojonnier Witnesses: oath: minors CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Provides that a child witness under the age of 10, inthe court's discretion, may be required only to promise to tell the truth. STATUS: 2/17/88 INTRODUCED. 3670 AUTHOR: Roos TITLE: Adolescent Family Life Act of 1988 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Enacts the "California Adolescent Family Life Act of 1988;" creates the Adolescent Family Life Program, to be administered by the Maternal and Child Health Branch; provides for the establishment of regional branches to deliver essential services to pregnant adolescents and school age parents. Fiscal impact. • 02/29/88 STATUS: 2/17/88 INTRODUCED. CA ACR 94 AUTHOR: Statham TITLE: Children's services CA S Page 8 File 51 LAST AMEND: 2/23/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Urges the legislature to adopt a Uniform Children's Services Policy. STATUS: 2/23/88 From ASSEMBLY Committee on HUMAN SERVICES with author's amendments. Amended. 163 AUTHOR: Watson TITLE: California Task Force on the Family LAST AMEND: 8/18/87 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Establishes in the Commission on the Status of women a 15 - member California Task Force on the Family to compile research regarding California families, evaluate programs, and recommend legislation addressing the unmet needs of persons who are negatively affected by the lack of stable family environment. Appropriation. STATUS: 8/18/87 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time and amended. Re- referred to ASSEMBLY Committee on WAYS AND MEANS. CA S 215 AUTHOR: Watson TITLE: Child Support LAST AMEND: 7/08/87 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Authorizes a court, upon a finding that but for the parents' separation or the dissolution of their marriage, a parent would have provided support for appropriate education or training of a child, to order the payment of support for the costs of maintenance and education or training of the child after the age of majority, as specified. Provides that the court may order such a payment to be made directly to the child. Makes related provisions. STATUS: 7/08/87 From ASSEMBLY Committee on JUDICIARY with authors 02/29/88 Page 9 File 51 amendments. Read second time and amended. Rereferred to committee. CA S 508 AUTHOR: Presley TITLE: Homeless youth pilot projects LAST AMEND: 1/04/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Extends the effectiveness of the Homeless Youth Act of 1985 peranently. Fiscal icpact. Appropriation. STATUS: 2/01/88 To ASSEMBLY Committee on HUMAN SERVICES. CA S 1760 AUTHOR: Torres TITLE: Children's services HEARING: 3/09/88 CLIENT COMMENTS: CA S CA S COMMITTEE: SHHS SUMMARY: Establishes the Interagency Board, comprised of requesentativea of representatives of entities of government, convening quarterly to address and resolve issues of children's services, recommend action, or recommend legislative measures to executive authorities. STATUS: 1/21/88 To SENATE Committee on HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. 1803 AUTHOR: Lockyer TITLE: Family Law CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Provide that unsupervised convicted of no parent shall be awarded custody or visitation with any child if he or she has been specified offenses against a child. STATUS: 1/28/88 To SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY. 1859 AUTHOR: TITLE: Presley Minors CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Relates to the taking of a child by a peace officer without a warrant, to take a minor into temporary custody, when there is reasonable cause to believe that the minor is in 02/29/88 CA S CA S Page 10 File 51 immediate danger of physical or sexual abuse, rather than In immediate danger of continued physical or sexual abuQe. Makes technical changes and other provisions. STATUS: 2/11/88 To SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY. 1887 AUTHOR: Watson TITLE: Children's services CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Relates to services to handicapped persona under 21; changes definitions; prohibits discrimination related to rendering of services; establishes a fair hearing system for dissatisfied recipients of services; appropriation. STATUS: 2/11/88 To SENATE Committee on HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. 2083 AUTHOR: TITLE: Mello Crimea: child abuser prosecution program CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Appropriates a certain amount of funding from the General Fund to the Controller for distribution to Monterey County for the purpose of continuing its child abuser prosecution program. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/24/88 To SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY. CA S 2086 AUTHOR: Presley TITLE: Child abuse and neglect: federal fund allocations CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Changes a committee name to the Committee on Child Abuse Prevention of the State Social Services Advisory Board; requires the committee to make recommendations for the expenditure of State Children's Trust Fund moneys to be used for child abuse and neglect projects; makes for numerous specifics. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/25/88 To SENATE Committee on HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. CA S 2205 AUTHOR: Roberti TITLE: Sexual assault victims: medical examinations CLIENT COMMENTS: 02/29/88 Page 11 File 51 SUMMARY: Requires the Office of Criminal Justice Planning to establish a protocol for the examination and treatment of victims of sexual assault and attempted sexual assault, including child molestation, and the collection and preservation of evidence therefrom, in accordance with specified minimum standards. Deletes the authorization ,permitting public ani private general acute care hospitals to adopt a referral protocol. Appropriation. STATUS: 2/25/88 To SENATE Committee on JUDICIARY. CA S 2215 AUTHOR: Seymour TITLE: Child welfare services CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Provides that when a child has been placed in a coutny operated shelter for a prescribed period of time, the child is eligible for state funding. Requires the department to develop a financing plan for the placement cost of these children. Fiscal impact. STATUS: 2/25/88 To SENATE Committee on HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. CA S 2227 AUTHOR: Marks TITLE: Child development programs: parent services CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to assist child development programs in establishing and operating parent services and resource programs throughout the state, requires each child development program that receives funds pursuant to this bill to provide 10% matching funds. Makes other provisions. Urgency. Appropriation. STATUS: 2/25/88 To SENATE Committee on EDUCATION. CA SCA 7 AUTHOR: Richardson TITLE:. ' Family law CLIENT COMMENTS: SUMMARY: Adds to the specification of various personal rights of citizens a statement of intent with regard to the importance of the nurturing and protection of California's families. STATUS: 1/29/87 To SENATE Committees on RULES and CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS. 02/29/88 END OF REPORT Page 12 File 51 May 3, 1988 City Council Meeting May 10, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: Joseph Casanova, represented by Carl M. Hovland, Esq., 1650 South Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 300, Redondo Beach, CA 90277, filed April 25, 1988 - personal injuries from parking meter. Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator. Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. Concur: • I V:Atiel-City Manager RA HLEEN MIDSTORRE, City Clerk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CARL M. HOVLAND, ESQ. LAW OFFICES OF CARL M. HOVLAND Suite 300, Riviera Building 1650 S. Pacific Coast Highway Redondo Beach, California 90277 Telephone: (213) 540-1140 Attorney for Claimant CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 910) CLAIM OF ) ) JOSEPH CASANOVA, ) ) Claimant, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ) ) Defendants. ) ) lAir/ TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, AND TO THEIR AUTHORIZED AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that claimant, JOSEPH CASANOVA, does hereby serve and present a Claim for Personal Injuries pursuant to the California Government Code as follows: (a) The mailing address of claimant, JOSEPH CASANOVA, is 1650 S. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 300, Redondo Beach, California 90277. (b) Claimant desires all notices or other communication in regard to the claim to be sent to his attorney, CARL M. HOVLAND, ESQ., located at 1650 South Pacific Coast Highway, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Suite 300, Redondo Beach, California 90277, telephone (213) 540-1140. (c) This claim is based upon personal injuries sustained by the claimant on or about April 11, 1988. The occurrence upon which this claim is based occurred at Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street, when claimant was on said public property and his hand became entangled in and lacerated by metal projections from parking meter #E77A. (d) This claim is based on the negligent supervision of the parking meter; negligent design, control and maintenance of the said parking meter at said location; negligent hiring and instruction of parking meter attendants. le) As a result of the said negligence, the claimant sustained severe lacerations to his hand. (f) The medical implications of these injuries sustained by claimant are unknown as of the date of presentation of this claim. The indebtedness, obligations, damages, and loss incurred by dlaimant, and the nature and extent theredf.are unknown as of the presentation of this claim. (g) At the time of presentation of this claim, the amount claimed by claimant as well as the estimated amount of the prospective injury, damages, pr loss for claimant is unknown. DATED: April 20, 1988 CA •+ ' . H ' ND Attorney for Claimant 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (VERIFICATION - 446 and 2015.5 C.0 P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF I, the undersigned, declare: I am the in the above -entitled action; I have read the foregoing and know the contents thereof; and the same is true of my own knowledge, except as to the matters which are therein stated upon my information and belief, and as w those matters, ! believe it to be true. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Caljfornla that the foregoing is true and correct. Date Signature of Declarant Type or Print Full Name of Declarant and Title. if applicable (PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL - I013a, 2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a resident of/employed in the aforesaid county. State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address/residence address is: 1650 S. Pacific Coast Highway. Suite 300; Redondo Beach, CA On April 20 , 19 88, I served the foregoing CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES fat forth the earn tick of the document arvedl interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Redondo Beach, California , California, addressed as follows: City Clerk's Office City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 1 certify (or declare), under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, J" t 'regoing is true and correct. April 20, 1988 WOLCOTTS FORM 811P—Rev. 882 .WOLCOTTS. INC. 1962 Date Signature of Declarant DY ' f' AM Type or Prim Full Name of Declarant Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 2, 1988 For the Meeting of May 10, 1988 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please Consider the following request for cancellation of the warrant listed below. #025694 - Ofer Timothy R. Turek - $210.00. Account Number 001- 400-2101-4312. Officer Turek will attend seminar, but will commute. #025569 - Dennis Allen - $210.00. Account Number 001-400-2101- 4312. Sargent Allen is not attending class. #025795 - Bruce Phillips - $21.75. Account Number 001-400-2101- 4312. Officer Phillips will not attend seminar. #026109 - Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of L.A. - $234.83. Account Number 001-400-1208-4305. Lower invoice amount received from vendor due to pricing error. Concur: ?:..17Z; in Nor her/Aft City Manager ary :rut h City Treasurer April 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR CONCRETE STREET REPAIR CIP 85-160 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign a Contract with Ruiz Engineering Company for concrete street repairs within the City, excluding 1st and 5th Streets, for the amount of $33,416. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Background: At the April 12, 1988 City Council meeting Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 85-160. This project involves removing and replacing deteriorated portions of concrete street in various locations throughout the City. The City has the option to include parts of 1st Street and 5th Street in the Concrete Street Repair project or to install an asphalt overlay on these two streets. The project was bid with two scopes of work: one including 1st and 5th Streets and the other not including them. The project was publicly advertised for two weeks. Thirteen contractors received bid packages. Analysis: Four sealed bids were received by the City Clerk on April 28, 1988. These bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bids were as follows: Ruiz Engineering Company Neff Contracting Corporation* Damon Construction Company Bruce Paving Company Schedule A $65,205 67,065 74,429 78,900 The Engineer's estimate was: $68,095 Schedule B Difference $30,378 $34,827 31,110 35,955 34,526 39,903 39,040 39,860 $32,845 $35,250 J. T. Garza bid under the name of Neff Contracting Corporation. 1 1p Five references were called to determine the low bidder's qualifications. The references indicated that Ruiz Engineering is capable of doing this type of work, finishing on schedule, within budget and producing quality work. Ruiz Engineering has a valid Class A General Engineering Contractor;s License (No. 352384) with the State of California. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted Amount $60,000 Contract Amount $30,378 10% Contingency 3,038 Cost Not To Exceed <33,416> Balance $26,504 The City has the option of awarding either Schedule A or Schedule B. If Schedule B is awarded, the contract amount would be $30,378 (+ 10%). An asphalt overlay would be installed over 1st and 5th Streets instead of removing and replacing the concrete. Vernon Paving is currently under contract for asphalt work within the City. Vernon has quoted a firm price of $32,447 for installing an asphalt overlay over the portions of 1st and 5th Streets which require repair work. The asphalt overlay would provide a cost savings of $2,380. The advantage of an asphalt overlay is a better ride, less noise and aesthetic improvement. Staff will return to City Council at a later date with all appropriate budget transfers relative to the asphalt overlay. Alternatives: 1. Reject the low bidder. 2. Rebid the project. 3. Modify the scope of work. 4. Drop the subject. Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengler / Assistant Engineer Concur: A 'ony Antic Director of P blic Works Concur: Noted for Fiscal Impact: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager BWG/umv Attachments: CIP Budget Project Schedule 2 Viki Copeland Finance Administrator 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU• FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: Roadway Improvements & Appurtenances PROJECT NUMBER: CIP 85-160 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 115-401-8160-4201 PROGRAM AREA: Street & Safety Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: This on-going CIP provides for: - Installation of new sidewalks and replacement of deteriorated sidewalk - Replacement of street signs - Work in public right-of-way such as bench maintenance•tree removal and planting, etc. A majority of FY87-88 work will concentrate on concrete repairs Citywide. This CIP also includes sidewalk installation on Aviation adjacent to Greenwood Park. • BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 •Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU TIIRU FY86-87 PROJECT FY86-87 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PLANS, SPECS 6 ESTIMATESI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1. 1 1 1 1 1 16,0001: 215401_ 16,0001 01_ 60,0001_ 16,0001_ 9 ADA CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS 1• SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY • • TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE lq.4991--2.54 1-14.9991 41_ AQ►OA__16.00A.. 22.OD91 A A A A I A 16,000 2,540 16,000 60.000 16.000 92.000 FUND NO. FUNDING SOURCES 1151 State Gas Tax I 8,0001 • 120 I County Gas TaxI__ 80001 I 1 I 1 1 I ****************** FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL I I I I I 1 8,0001 01- 550001- 1010001_ 7320001 8..0001 01_ mop,. mops_ 19, 0001 2, 540 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 TOTAL FUNDING 16.000 2.540 16.000 : 0 60.000 16.000 92.000 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE / ,1 PROJECT NAME : LIP g - 160 CONCRETE •STIZET k PAIRS ACCOUNT NUMBER : LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE s sus sem ume m ou ACTUAL SCHEDULE s mommommisommem X : 1009E COMPLETE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I------1 1 1 TASKS JAN 1 FEB 1 MAR 1 APR 1 MAY 1 JUN 1 JUL 1 AUG 1 SEP I OCT I NOV I DEC I . Final design approval before advertising for construction 1 1..........1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Prepare advertisement & set bid opening1 ..........1 • 11111111 date I 1 1 ! L- I I I I I I 1 Advertising period Him (issue addendums as necessary) 1 1 1 1 lilt -......--I I i I ( I I 1 i Accept sealed bids & public bid opening 11 1 I I 1 MI 'IIII..-r I I I I I I Review bids 1 1 I 1 IPII I 1 1 I I I I Award contract 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 Sign contract 111 (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I Preconstruction meeting procedure 111 I I I I 1 I I -�---- I I I 1 1 1 Issue "Notice to Proceed" 1.11 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I 1111 I Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project close :out 11111111 I 'I 1 I' I 1 iiiiiimm. 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I $ 1 11111 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1III 11 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 11,1 I 1 1 1 I I. I 1 I 1 I I IIllIiu'II+Il I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 -1, r May 3, 1988 City Council Meeting May 10, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-924 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTIONS 1209, 1210, 1211 AND 1212 PERTAINING TO ENCROACHMENTS INTO REQUIRED YARD AREAS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-924 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of April 26, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson None None None 'Kevin B. Northctaft, City Manager Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 88- 924 AN ORDINANCE OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTIONS 1209, 1210, 1211 AND 1212 PERTAINING TO ENCROACHMENTS INTO REQUIRED YARD AREAS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 26, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Zoning Ordinance is in need of revision in light of current methods of construction and architectural treatment to structures; B, Modifying the Zoning Ordinance regarding encroachments into yard areas will eliminate confusion regarding such encroachments, and will enhance architectural treatment of proposed development; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does bereby ordain the following Text Amendment: Section 1: Amend Section 1209 to read as follows: "Section 1209. Architectural Encroachments into Required Yards. Required yards areas shall be unobstructed from ground to sky except specifically allowed as follows: 1. Cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills and buttresses may encroach into any required yard area not more than thirty (30) inches provided that in no case may such encroachments be closer than thirty (30) inches to any lot line. 2. Bay windows, greenhouse windows and similar windows which are no wider than eight (8) feet, spaced a minimum of ten (10) feet apart, and which do not create additional floor area may encroach within three (3) feet of the side or rear lot line, and three (3) feet from the front lot line, but in no case shall the depth of such windows be more thirty (30) inches. 3. Pilasters, columns and chases for mechanical equipment which have a depth of six (6) inches or less, a width of one (1) foot or less, may encroach, but in no case shall such encroachment be closer than thirty (30) inches to the lot line. 4. Encroachments into required yards which are determined to be architectural projections by the Planning Director shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet apart." Section 2: Amend Section 1210 to read as follows: "Section 1210. Fireplace Encroachment into Yards. Fireplace structures which are not wider than eight (8) feet, are spaced a minimum of Ten (10) feet apart, and are part of the main building may project into the required yards a distance of thirty (30) inches provided such encroachments are no closer than thirty (30) inches to the lot line." Section 3: Amend Section 1211 to read as follows: "Section 1211. Fire Escape Encroachment into Yards Fire escapes may encroach into yards thirty (30) inches provided that in no case such encroachment is closer than thirty (30) inches to the lot line." Section 4: Amend Section 1212 as follows: "Section 1212. Stairway and Balcony Encroachments into Front Yard Areas. An open uncovered balcony may encroach into a required front yard thirty-six (36) inches, but in no case shall such encroachment be closer than three (3) feet to the front property line and shall be a minimum of seven (7) feet above finished grade. An unenclosed stairway or steps uncovered leading from grade to the first floor level only may encroach into a required front yard thirty-six (36) inches, but in no case shall such encroachment be closer than three (3) feet to the front property line." Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: rf:' APPROVED 0 FO Qe . CITY CLERK ITY ATTORNEY 1. Location a. Address: City-wide • b. Legal • 2. Description Text amendment to sections 1209-1212 pertainging to encroachments into re. uirea yard a eac 3. Sponsor a. Name: Planning Department, City of Hermosa Beach b. Mailing Address: 1 ' 1 5 val l ay nriue, Hermosa Reach. [`A Q 12Sd Phone: 213-376-6984 NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE .We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- . posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation sup••rtings finding is on file in the Building Department. 1-21=-_i928 Date of Finding Chair Envi4onmental Review Committee FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, •rovided, a attached miti•ation measures are included in the project, it would •• = - ificant effect on the en- vironment. Documentation Supp• ing� �•ing is on file in the Build- ing Department. 107(5= -SPA Date of Finding an, Planning Commission FINS NG OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas • - ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on . the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. Date of Finding -- Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council May 3, 1988 City Council Meeting May 10, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-925 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 28A "SIGNS" AS IT RELATES TO PUNISHMENT OF VIOLATIONS OF SIGNING REGULATIONS. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-925 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of April 26, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, None None None Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson evin B. Northcrt, City Manager Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk 12b 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88-925 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 28A "SIGNS" AS IT RELATES TO PUNISHMENT OF VIOLATIONS OF SIGNING REGULATIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 28A -2(d) Violations and Penalties is hereby amended to read as follows: (d) Violations and penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert, demolish, equip, use or maintain any sign or structure in the city or cause or permit the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of an infraction. 1) Each violation is punishable as follows: a) A fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) for the first violation; and b) A fine of one hundred ($100.00) for a second violation of the same condition within one year; and c) A fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00)for a third violation of the same condition within one year. d) A fine of three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each additional violation of the same condition within one year. 2) Each person, firm or coporation found guilty of an i_Iraction shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation is committed, continued or permitted by such person and shall be punishable accordingly. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 . 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1988. PRE ID o t e ty ounc an Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO a, vi o to tyo CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY April 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 10, 1988 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE I, "ADMINISTRATION" SECTION 2-3 AND CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IIA, "DIRECTOR OF FINANCE", SECTION 2-22.4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY REVISING THE METHOD OF FIXING THE AMOUNT OF BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK, THE CITY TREASURER, AND THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council introduce the attached ordinance amending Chapter 2, Article I, section 2-3 and Article IIA, section 2-22.4 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code by revis- ing the method of fixing the amount of bond for the City Clerk, City Treasurer, and Director of Finance. Background: The requirement for the City Clerk and City Treasurer to be bond- ed, and the amount for the bonds, is set forth in Section 2-3 of the Municipal Code. For the Director of Finance, the bonding requirement is set forth in Section 2-22.4 of the Code. Prior to the last City elections in November 1987, elected terms had run from April to April and the terms of the bonds ran con- currently. Due to the change in the election period, and as a result of an inquiry about elected officials bonds by Mayor Simp- son in January of this year, it was discovered that no bond had been obtained for the City Treasurer following his election in November (since there was no change in the City Clerk, that bond had remained in effect). Following this discovery, the City's insurance broker was con- tacted to obtain the„necessary bonds. At the same time all bond requirements were reviewed with the City Attorney. Upon his recommendation the amount of bond for the City Treasurer was in- creased to S100,000, that of the City Clerk was increased to $10,000, and bond for the Director of Finance was established at $100,000. The bonds for these positions, as well as a Resolution establishing the recommended amounts, have been submitted for the City Council's approval as a separate item on this agenda in ac- cordance with Government Code, Sec. 26520. Additionally, the City Manger has issued an Administrative Memo- randum which establishes responsibility for the orientation of newly elected officials to assure that issues such as bonding requirements not "slip through the cracks” in the future. 2c Analysis: Section 36518 of the Government Code requires that the penal amount of the bonds for City Clerk and City Treasurer be in a reasonable amount recommended by the City Attorney and fixed by the City Council. Section 36518 of the Government Code was amen- ded in 1965 allowing the City Council to establish the amount of bond required by Resolution. The City Attorney has recommended that the bond amounts be es- tablished by a Resolution of the City Council rather than fixed by Ordinance. This change allows for the amount of bond required to be adjusted more readily in order to reflect changes in the fiscal responsibilities of these positions. The attached ordinance revises section 2-3 and section 2-22.4 of the Municipal Code to allow the amount of bond for the City Treasurer, City Clerk, and Director of Finance to be established by'Resolution. Respectfully subm CI , (44„4a6b-cf"- Robert A. Blackwood Risk Manager NOTED: City Attorney Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE I, "ADMINISTRATION", SECTION 2-3 AND ARTICLE IIA, "DIRECTOR OF FINANCE", SECTION 2-22.4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE F THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY REVISING THE METHOD OF FIXING THE AMOUNT OF BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK, CITY TREASURER, AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE OF SAID CITY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Article I, "Administration", Section 2-3, "Bonds of City Clerk and City Treasurer", of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, is hereby amended to read: "Pursuant to section 36518 of the state Government Code, the city clerk and city treasurer shall each execute a bond to the City prior to entering upon the duties of their offices, The penal sum of the bond shall be established by a Resolution of the City Council." SECTION 2. That the amount of bond fixed for the City Clerk by Ordinance No. N.S. 365 is hereby repealed. SECTION 3. That the amount of bond fixed for the City Treasurer by Ordinance N.S. 62 is hereby repealed. SECTION 4. That Chapter 2, Article IIA, "Director of Finance", Section 2-22.4, "Fidelity bond required", of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, is hereby amended, pursuant to Sections 36518 and 36519 of the Government Code of the State of California, to read: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "Pursuant to section 36518 and 36519 of the state Government Code, the Director of Finance shall execute and deposit with the City of Hermosa Beach a fidelity bond. The penal amount of the bond shall be established by a Resolution of the City Council." SECTION 5. That the amount of bond fixed for the Director of Finance by Ordinance N.S. 303 is herely repealed. SECTION 6. That all other provisions of Ordinance N.S. 303 remain in full effect. SECTION 7. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Calif. ATTEST: ROVED AS TO ORM: , CITY CLERK rA7( /.. / , CITY ATTORNEY Earitgrtruttii a it r -tat. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO.N.S. 62 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE AMOUNTS OF BONDS OF THE CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER OF SAID CITY, AND REPEALING ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. • THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLL0gS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the provisions of subdivisio 853 of Act 5233, Deering's General Laws, bonds of the City Clerk and the City Treasurer are hereby fixed at the following amounts: City Treasurer $50,000 City Clerk $25,000. SECTION 2. That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith and particularly Ordinance No.N.S.12, passed and adopted March 7, 1944, and all ordinances repealed by said Ordinance No.N.S.12 are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. This ordinance is an urgency measure required for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety and shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. The facts constituting its urgency are as follows: Section 853 of the Municipal Corporations Act being Act 5233 of Deering's General Laws, requires that the City Council shall in not less than thirty (30) days prior to the election or appointment of the City Clerk and City Treasurer fix the amount of the bonds, which said officers are required to file to insure faithful performance of their duties and that unless said ordinance is adopted as an urgency measure, the same will not be effective prior to the election ofsaid officers. • SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption, and shall be published at least once in the Hermosa Beach Review, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 23rd day of March, 1948. PRESIDENT of the Cly Council arid MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 365 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ARTICLE I, "ADMINISTRATION", ADMINISTRATION , SECTION 2-3 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHBY REVISING THE AMOUNT OF BOND FIXED FOR THE CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY. THECITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. r .. • and City Treasurer", • • That Article 1, "Administration", Section 2-3, "Bonds of City Clerk of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, • is hereby amended, and that pursuant to Section 36518 of the Government Code of the State of California, the bond of the City Clerk is hereby fixed at the following amount: City Clerk $2,000 SECTION 2. That the amount of bond fixed for the City Clerk by Ordinance No.s.:. N. S. 62, passed and adopted March 23,. J.948, is hereby repealed. SECTION 3. That all other provisions of Ordinance No. N. S. 62 remain in full effect. :. :SECTION 4. That this. ordinance shall. take effect thirty,(30) ;days -from.thedate of sits •adoption, : and. prior to the •expiration of fifteen ,(15) days from the*.passage.rhenarof. shall be•published at:least once in the Hermosa.Beach:Rev.lew, a-. weekly -newspaper of .. a '::j general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. ' PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 1969. • PRESIDENT of. the City. Council,.and•. MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California TEST: APPROVED TO FORM: • 42114.4/ • • CITY ATTORNEY • • •'i:; .•-4'.,!') . ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 303 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CREATING THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND TRANSFERRING THE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING DUTIES FROM THE CITY CLERK TO SAID POSITION. THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. In order to establish a central area for the uniform processing and development of all fiscal and budgetary functions, there is hereby created the office of Director of Finance for the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 2. The Director of Finance shall be charged with all of the financing and accounting duties of the City of Hermosa Beach, and shall be subject to all of the powers granted and imposed upon the City Clerk by the provisions of Article I, Chapter 4, Part 2, Division 3, Title IV of the Government Code of the State of California, and Sections 40802, 40803, 40804 and 40805 of said Government Code. The Director of Finance shall perform such other duties as may • Se delegated from time to time by the City Council or the City Manager of the City. SECTION 3. In accordance with Section 40805.5 of the Government Code of the State of California, all of the financing and accounting duties imposed upon the City Clerk under Sections 40802 through 40805 of said Government Code are hereby transferred to the Director of Finance and the City Clerk is hereby relieved of all said duties. SECTION 4. The Director of Finance shall execute and deposit with the City of Hermosa Beach a fidelity bond, as required of the City Clerk by Section 36518 of said Government Code. Said bond shall be in the sum of $25,000.00. SECTION 5. The position of Director of Finance may be combined with that of any other office in the City of Hermosa Beach, by resolution of the City Council. SECTION 6. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and virtue at midnight thirty (30) days from and after the date of the adoption thereof. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original Ordinances of said City; • shall make a Minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting of said Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof cause the same to be published once in the Hermosa Beach Review, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated within said City, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of March , 1967. ATTEST: PR O, ENT of the City Council, and R of the City of Hermosa Beach, California {,?t G:G%cafe/ lC7l,� CITY CLERK April 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 10, 1988 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE PENAL AMOUNT OF BOND REQUIRED FOR THE CITY CLERK, CITY TREASURER, AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt the attached Resolution, and 2. Approve the attached bonds executed in the name of the City Clerk, City Treasurer, and Finance Director. Background: Bonds are required of the City Clerk and City Treasurer per Sec- tion 2-3 of the Municipal Code. Section 2-22.4 of the Code re- quires a bond of the Director of Finance. The City Manager ser- ves in the capacity of Finance Director. Section 36520 of the Government Code requires that the City Coun- cil approve all bonds. Following approval, the City Clerks bond is filed with the Mayor and all other bonds are filed with the City Clerk. As a separate matter on this agenda, the City Council has been requested to introduce an Ordinance which amends the procedure by which the penal amount of bond is established for the above-named positions. Currently the amount of bond is established by Or- dinance and embodied in the Municipal Code. The City Attorney has recommended that this procedure be changed to allow for the setting of bond amounts by Resolution. Analysis: The attached Resolution is intended to take affect upon the adop- tion of the Ordinance introduced at this meeting. Bonds in the amounts established by this Resolution have been secured from the City's insurance broker and are attached for the Council's ap- proval per section 36520 of the state Government Code. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Risk Manger OTED: ity •tt Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE PENAL AMOUNT OF BOND REQUIRED FOR THE CITY CLERK, CITY TREASURER, AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach has the obligation under the state Government Code, section 36518, to establish the penal sum of the bonds required for the City Clerk and the City Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the City Council of said City adopted Ordinance No. N.S. 303 on March 21, 1967 which created the office of Direc- tor of Finance and transferred all of the financing and account- ing duties imposed upon the City Clerk under sections 40802 through 40805 of the state Government Code to that office; and WHEREAS, the City Council has introduced an Ordinance establishing that the penal amount of bonds for the abovemen- tioned positions shall be set by Resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to section 36518 of the state Government Code, the penal amount of bond required for the City Clerk is hereby set at S10,000; and SECTION 2. That pursuant to section 36518 of the state Government Code, the penal amount of bond required for the City Treasurer is hereby set at S100,000; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. That pursuant to sections 36518 and 36519 of the state Government Code, the penal amount of bond required for the Director of Finance is hereby set at 5100,000. SECTION 4. That this resolution shall not take effect until the Ordinance amending sections 2-3 and 2-22.4 of the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code establishing that- the penal amount of bonds required for the City Clerk, City Treasurer, and Director of Finance shall be set by resolution is adopted. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions of the said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, 1988 PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: City Clerk PPROVED AS T RM: y Attorne Fidelity and Deposit Company HOME OFFICE Premium charged for this bond is 3...50.00 OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 California Public official Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Kathleen Midstokke That we,. as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland and duly authorized and licensed by the laws of the State of California to do a general surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the State of California, in the sum of_. Ten Thousand and No/ 100 Dollars (3_ l0a 000 .. lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said State of California, or its assigns, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, admin- istrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Bond No 3014 98 46 THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal was, on the 24th day of November 19 87., duly....... Elected City Clerk in and for the City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles ... , State of California This bond shall commence on County of.. ......�__. February 23, 1988 and remain in full force and effect until cancelled Now, if the said principal will well, truly, and faithfully perform all official duties then required of him by law, and also all such additional duties as may be imposed on him by any existing law of the State or law enacted subsequently to the execution of the bond, then this obligation to be void; otherwise, to remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have executed this bond at .._............... ....... Pasadena , California this 25thµ day of March 19 88 Principal FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT CO PANY OF MARYLAND Alt---"‘ Charles F. Wilson, Attorney -in -Fad STATE OF CALIFORNIA se Los Angeles . COUNTY OF_.. �..�___.. .... ..... On this_. 13069c1CA1-2 25th Norma 0. Burbano (SEAL) day of.._._ March_.�_......___............._ ._19 88 _, before me ....._... ................_._�......._, a Notary Public in and for the said County of........ Los Angeles State of California, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Charles F. Wilson known to me to be the Attorney -in -Fact of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Mary- land, the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland thereto and his own name as Attorney -in -Fact. OFFICIAL SEAL NORMA 0. BURBANO Notary Public -California Principal Office In Los Angeles County My Comm. Exp. Feb. 4, 1991 Notary umit/ al /1/6404A? blic in and for the County of Los Angeles ., State of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF las: I, ....».... ..__...»......._» ».. »...._»», do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter. And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organiza- tion, political or otherwise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means except as follows: .....»...._.»_....»»»._. »..»...».»».». at no affiliations, write is the words "No Bsceptions") and that during such time as I hold the office of (Name of Me) I will not advocate nor become a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means. Subscribed and sworn to before me this .day of .....» 19 ti t -spsoaag A3uno, 0. -----1°A u! pupsouai pus i O. k 0. ovi n 0 t0 Filed for Record at the Request of m puog iopaoao leigl panosddd 0 CD 0. sy E • Fidelity and Deposit Company HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 Premium charged for this bond is $ 500.00 er Annum. California Public Official Bond Bond No. 3014 98 80 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we,.. . Gary Brutsch as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland and duly authorized and licensed by the laws of the State of California to do a general surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the State of California, in the sum of One Hundred Thousand and No/ 100 Dollars 100,000. ($._ _...._.�. ), lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said State of California, or its assigns, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, admin- istrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal was, on the 24th day of November 19_.87.., duly.......Elect.. Treasurer in and for the... Cityof Hermosa Beach County of Los Angeles , State of California This bond shall commerce on February 171 1988 and remain in full force and effect until canc'eT d' `..:... Now, if the said principal will well, truly, and faithfully perform all official duties then required of him by law, and also all such additional duties as may be imposed on him by any existing law of the State or law enacted subsequently to the execution of the bond, then this obligation to be void; otherwise, to remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have executed this bond at Pasadena, 88 , California this........ 1st day of April 19 Principal FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COM ANY OF MARYLAND (SEAT.) By...G..�� Charles F. Wilson Attorney -in -Fact STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Los Angeles ss: 88 ril 1st On this day of.. ........._. _19 , before me Norma 0. Burbano ._._..., a Notary Public in and for the said County of ... Los An&eles .._..State of California, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Charles F. Wilson known to me to be the Attorney -in -Fact of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Mary- land, the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland thereto and his own name as Attorney -in -Fact. J3069c(CA1-2500, O Fi^!AL .SEAL;;� 1 y� NO 1MA 0. BUR3ANO 2 t4;.,t,ry.*a,:,-C!itornia 4♦I Los Angeles, Prinur; i Ot ice in , State of California Los A,n les County My Comm. Exp Feb. 4, 1991 600e+oeas000eooa000000 • Notary Public in and for the County of STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Sal I, ...., do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter. And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organiza- tion, political or otherwise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means except as follows: -..r_....»_.^.»__»... .............. (If no affiliations. write in the words *Wet Exceptional • and that during such time as I hold the office of (Name of office) I will not advocate nor become a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means. Subscribed and sworn to before me this .day of 19 7 sapsooag CCjnd9Q 00.411.0 a. ». a e 0 1* 0. Filed for Record at the Request of O. 0 P puog i8Iaoao sigl paeosddd • Fidelity and Deposit Company HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 Premium charged for this bond i>5..._350 :00 Per annum. California Public Official Bond Bond No...3014 98 81 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we,._ .. KEVIN B . NORTHCRAFT as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland and duly authorized and licensed by the laws of the State of California to do a general surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the State of California, in the sum of.___ One Hundred Thousand and No/ 100 Dollars 100,000. ($___.___ ...... __), lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said State of California, or its assigns, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, admin- istrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal was, on the....... 12th day of January ,........_19_88., duly Appointed ............... ►:-..Y......_t i .! V r) _._....._ ...............City Manager _..._._......._. in and for the_.__City_of Hermosa Beach County of Los Angeles ......., State of California. This bond shall commence on February 22, 1988 and remain in full force and effect until cancelled Now, if the said principal will well, truly, and faithfully perform all official duties then required of him by law, and also all such additional duties as may be imposed on him by any existing law of the State or law enacted subsequently to the execution of the bond, then this obligation to be void; otherwise, to remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have executed this bond at...._....__._ Pasadena , California this.-.._....�St-.... day of April 19 88 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS Ange l e s On this 1st day of... April Norma 0. Burbano Principal FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPS .NY OF MARYLAND -}ss: (SEAL) By Charles F. Wilson Attorney -in -Fact County of Los Angeles 88 19 ....., before me ., a Notary Public in and for the said State of California, residing therein, duly Charles F. Wilson commissioned and sworn, personally appeared known to me to be the Attorney -in -Fact of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Mary- land, the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland thereto and his own name as Attorney -in -Fact. 6.6•666-6-66 604.04,64.60,640666 9 `� OFFICIAL SEAL : /7 ' NORMA 0. B U RBANO i Notary Public in and for the County of e rb :,.- —t Not Ribr:ccai;tornia • • ' - '�►� Print: Ot;ce In Los Angeles t"'i i g ,State of California • Los Angel._s County J CAI-2500.1t.s7 "�' My Comm. Exp. Feb. 4, 1991 1977714-' O 63A,z+4,(4-0- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF I, .— do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter. And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organiza- tion, political or otherwise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means except as follows: (If no affiliations, write in the words No Exceptions" ) and that during such time as I hold the office of • (Name of Office) I will not advocate nor become a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means. Subscribed and sworn to before me this ..day of 19 IS O to o al �, 0. 0 Jo 3sanbag alp. In psoaag Jo' pang g. puog PPPM ° O. 0 May 3, 1988 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL May 10, 1988 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #44937 (C.U.P. CON NO. 86-8) LOCATION: 829-833 FIFTH STREET APPLICANT: MIKE TUMANJAN REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 10 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #44937 which is consistent with the Tentative Tract Map approved on December 2, 1986 by the Planning Commission. It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the the attached Resolution and the Final Map. 2. Find that this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. 3. Find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 4. Find that the development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land. 5. Find that the approval of said map shall be subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commision Resolution No. 86- 55, adopted after public hearing on December 2, 1986. 6. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of Final Tract Map #44937 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. . CONCU /.1 Michael Sctiubae Planning Director 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Resp tful submitted, ./At An -ew Pe ea Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP #44937 FOR A TEN -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 829-833 FIFTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, on December 2, 1986, the Planning Commission ap- proved the Tentative Tract Map; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City -of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Tract Map #44937 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 6, Tract 294, as recorded in Book 14, Page 61 and a portion of Lot 9, Block 85, Second Addition to Her- mosa Beach, as recorded in Book 3, Pages 11 and 12, both of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a ten -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 829- 833 5th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. 2. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act. 3. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 4. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land. 5. The approval of said map shall be subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 86-55, adopted after public hearing on December 2, 1986. 6. The City Council hereby instructs the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: A ROVED A *41 2 br. Eatkgriauttb filatrr.iatg THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director CECIL E. BUGH, Chief Deputy Director MAS NAGAMI, Assistant Director April 13, 1988 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: L-1 850.24 The City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Council Members: TRACT N0. 44937 The subject map has been checked by the City Engineer and is ready for your approval. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: 1. Approve the map. 2. Make findings as follows: a. That this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1 and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. b. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. c. That the development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the. subject division of land, pursuant to Section 66436(a)3A(I-VII) of the Subdivision Map Act. 3. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Tract No. 44937 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. The City Council City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 Please return the signed original tracing to the Subdivision Section, Land Development Division, Department of Public Works, for processing and filing with the Registrar -Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. Very truly yours, T. A. TIDEMANSON City Engineer Donald Y. Milne 7//d - Deputy City Engineer M E: kc Attachments cc: City Clerk Director of Public Works CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL FROM: MICHAEL SCHUBACH, LA 4' RECTOR SUBJECT: REVISED RESOLUTION FOR 1276 9TH STREET - APPEAL OF LOT MERGER DATE: MAY 10, 1988 At the April 26, 1988 City Council Meeting, the appellant, Martha Northup, requested that her three 25' lots and 10' of vacated street be divided into two equal size lots of 4,250 square feet. Based on the City Council action, staff has prepared the attached resolution which will allow for a lot line adjustment moving the westerly lot line of lot 37, 7.5 feet to the west, and merging lots 38 and 39, thus creating two parcels of 4,250 square feet each. 2f RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS 39 AND 38 EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 7.5 FEET OF THE REDONDO VILLA TRACT, AND ALLOWING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR LOT 37 OF THE REDONDO VILLA TRACT MOVING THE WESTERLY LOT LINE 7.5 FEET TO THE WEST, THUS CREATING IN TOTAL TWO STANDARD LOTS FROM LOTS 39, 38 AND 37 PLUS 10 FEET OF VACATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, EACH LOT COMPRISED OF 4250 SQUARE FEET AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 26, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following findings: A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 1, 1988, approved on appeal from the property owners, the unmerger of the subject lots; B. Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Zoning Ordinance prescribes the procedures for the merger of parcels; C. The City of Redondo Beach has granted the vacation of a 10 foot wide section of Reynolds Lane to the owners of 1276 9th Street; D. The City Council finds these parcels to be consistent with the criteria for merger into two parcels which conform to the the zoning and subdivision ordinances: 1. Each parcel shall contain a minimum of 4000 square feet, • and; 2. Each parcel shall be a minimum of 40 feet wide. E. The merger and adjustment of these lots into two parcels will preserve the character of the existing neighborhoods by maintaining current densities and preserving public on -street parking; 1 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, Calfornia, does hereby approve the merger and lot line adjustment said lots, addressed of 1276 9th Street into two parcels which conform to the zoning and subdivision requirements. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 2 /6 1.6 * o 45 BLK. 11 • • . 44 i.00r L.swIC ST. $40ausrmilar 14) *Ms 1,s# 43 •0 42 11 41 SO 40 319 • 4,0 • 37 143 27 01 ••••••• ' 4S E.. 28 01 29 11 30 31 11 32 11 33 SO 34 35 362 ST. SPEYER LN. (r) 0 > - Id ZO • -ectoncl 0 kit la, flood itma.10--q0-cd ovalecic tarir ibm Ahlo 315 wain 1106 6 oF fixer HALYNNEs ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREA AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 26, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The State law requires consistency between the zoning and the General Plan; B. Rezoning the subject properties as indicated on the attached Maps will result in consistency between the zoning and General Plan; C. The rezoning of the subject area may result in view blockage, and therefore the City Council finds that the said issue is a priority for study and resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Rezone area 2A from R-2 to R-1, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-6 inclusive of Block 64 of First Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. 2. Rezone area 2B from R-2 to R-1 zone: - Lots 1-9 inclusive of Block 5, 1-5 inclusive of Block 4, 1-12 of Block 3, 25-27 inclusive of Block 2, and 22-29 inclusive of Block 1 of the Hermosa Terrace Tract; Lots 21 of Block 51 of the First Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. ▪ Lots 20-26 inclusive, 30 and 12-18 inclusive of Tract #1868; Lots 1-11 and 27-34 inclusive of Tract #1131; Lots 1-4 inclusive of Block 2 of Hermosa Terrace Annex. 3. Rezone area 2C from R-2 to R-1 zone: ▪ Lots 1-22 inclusive and 37-40 inclusive of Tract #113. ▪ Lots 23-60 inclusive of Tract #820. 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SUPPLEMENTAL 1 - INFORMATION 2g 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 6. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the city prior to April 26, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual pains (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and other similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issueda building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/ccorzon2 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Director SUBJECT: Rezone Area 2 DATE: May 3, 1988 • The attached Ordinance and maps reflect the changes requested by the City Council at their meeting of April 26, 1988 for the rezone of area 2. z� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREA AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 26, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The State law requires consistency between the zoning and the General Plan; B. Rezoning the subject properties as indicated on the attached Maps will result in consistency between the zoning and General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Rezone area 2A from R-2 to R-1, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-6 inclusive of Block 64 of First Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. 2. Rezone area 2B from R-2 to R-1 zone: - Lots 1-9 inclusive of Block 5, 1-5 inclusive of Block 4, 1-12 of Block 3, 25-27 inclusive of Block 2, and 22-29 inclusive of Block 1 of the Hermosa Terrace Tract; Lots 21 of Block 51 of the First Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. - Lots 20-26 inclusive, 30 and 12-18 inclusive of Tract 11868; Lots 1-11 and 27-34 inclusive of Tract 11131; Lots 1-4 inclusive of Block 2 of Hermosa Terrace Annex. 3. Rezone area 2C from R-2 to R-1 zone: - Lots 1-22 inclusive and 37-40 inclusive of Tract 1113. - Lots 23-60 inclusive of Tract 1820. 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation publis ed and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the city prior to April 26, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual palns (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and other similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issueda building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK • 00 •AREA.2 = AREA OVERVIEW .. .REZONE FROM TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) 7 SSIILVERSTRANO 't AVE MYRTLE AVE. 01000 • O. V. MAP 1 AREA 2A °LOMA DR' • • • • • MONTEREY A MAP 2 AREA 2B .40 f • i j ORIGINALLY PART OF AREA 2D o. • MAP 3 AREA 2C • • . �� 2h ` vb tib .. 6104 sm 2 40 0 ao, 3 o 3 a 6041 ® 0 4 4a o� 5 a 5 r so s, 6 0 6a 7 av o N. A , '� 04` 8' e4 tz so mow ` 1 .9 1;304 ®22 21 I" "' i k 6 ? V so ia d ® ,20 2 • 3o so 0 19 so ® 18 • 40 0 17 16 . I i5 15 14 14 l9 •13 40 • 3� 12 3o 11 III r. 3o DO V". 10 • O 10 40 1� N SILVERSTRAND ; AVE. MYRTLE AVE. •4 Location a. Address: Area 2 b. Legal: See attached map 2. Description Rezone of area 2 to be consistent with General Plan policies. 3. Sponsor a. Name: Planning Dcpartmant b. Mailing Address: 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: 213-376-6984 • NEGATIVE DECLARATION4 In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed • to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro . posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City. Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, ^^luded in the-{ e+eet, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. jl Date of Finding Cham, Env 'IoirU ntal Review Committee 2-18-1988 FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, provi• the -ttached miti•ation measures are included in the project, it woul• no •.ve - significant effect on the en- vironment. Documentation sup••rti . th'= finding is on file in the Build- ing Dfrparrmery Dat of Finding an, Planning Commission FINi'4 OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. Date of Findinc Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council May 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO STUDY CREATING AN R -1A ZONE. INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends that the attached Resolution of Intent be adopted. Background At their meeting of April 26, 1988 the City Council directed staff to return with a Resolution of Intent to direct the Planning Commission and staff to study creating an R -1A zone. Analysis In studying rezoning area 2, staff observed the need for a new zone which would allow two units on larger lots. Thus, staff recommended an R -1A zone that would allow two units on lots of at least 6700 sq. ft. which would conform to the General Plan Density Requirements. C- ONCUR: /1/ Michael Schubach Planning Director 1 Respectfully submitted, �L1N-1'tv A �lex Hnandez Assistant Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 88- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO STUDY MEANS OF CREATING AN R -1A ZONE. WHEREAS, at the May 10, 1988 City Council meeting, the City Council requested a Resolution of Intent to study creating an R -1A zone and made the following Findings: 1. The City Council is desirous of creating a zone that allows development which is compatible to lot size and is consistent with the General Plan; 2. The General Plan allows a maximum of one unit per 3350 sq. ft. of lot area in low density areas; 3. Lots of 6700 sq. ft. or greater may be of adequate size for 2 units. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby direct the Planning Commission and staff to study creating an R -1A zone, with a possible maximum 2 units per lot. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of May 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 88- A RESOI,OT ON OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,/ CALIFORNIA, TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO STUDY,,AMENDING THE 1984 SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE BILTMORE SITE TO BE EQUIVALENT TO THE 1985 SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE SITE. WHEREAS, at the May 10, 1988 City Council meeting, theme City Council requested a Resolution of Intent to stud 1984 Specific Plan for the Biltmore Site 1985 Specific Plan for the site and made 1. The City Council is desirous of Ing the to be equivalent to the the following Findings: ng the existing Specific Plan for the Biltmore Site. 2. The amended Specific Plan will develop a structure which is compatible with surrounding uses v I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED//tbat� tbe Cfty Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California,,does bereby direct tbe Planning Commission and staff to study/amendingttbe 1984 Specific Plan for the Biltmor si e t e u vales o be 985 Specif c Pla. for the site PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY SUPPLEMENTAL n• - 1 - INFORMATION May 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION BILTMORE SITE SPECIFIC PLAN Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO STUDY AMENDING OR REPEALING THE BILTMORE SITE (LOCATED BETWEEN 15TH STREET AND 13TH STREET, AND THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE) SPECIFIC PLAN." Backgroupd At the City Council Meeting of April 26, 1988, the City Council accepted the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff that a comprehensive study of this matter including amendments to Local Coastal Program and certified Land Use Plan should be considered prior to any changes or repeal, and that the elements of the proposed 1985 Specific Plan should be considered as an alternative. This resolution reflects the City Council direction. Also attached for your information are the Government Code Sections regarding adopting and amending Specific Plans. It does appear to require a Public Hearing at both Planning Commission and City Council level; and if any substantial modification is proposed by the legislative body and not previously considered by the Planning Commission during its hearings, they shall first be sent back to the Commission for their recommendation. • Kat leen Midstokke, City Clerk Noted: evin B. Northcra t, City Manager �2 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88 - AN RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO STUDY AMENDING OR REPEALING THE BILTMORE SITE (LOCATED BETWEEN 15TH STREET AND 13TH STREET, AND THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE) SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, at the April 26, 1988 City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed the recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff made as a result of Resolution of Inten- tion 87-5092, adopted on December 15, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the staff's and Planning Commission's recpmmendation that a compre- hensive study of this matter including amendments to Local Coastal Program and certified Land Use Plan should be considered prior to any changes or repeal; and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of having the elements of the proposed 1985 Specific Plan as an alternative use for this property; and WHEREAS, the City Council considers this issue a high priority; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council Of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby direct the Planning Commission and Staff t0 study amending, repealing, or changing in any Other way deemed appropriate, the 1984 Specific Plan for the Biltmore Site; including the elements of the proposed 1985 Specific Plan. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ATTEST: C ty Clerk DAY OF , 1988 PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of Hermosa Beach. PROVED AS A Orn Or le/e.4 S, P S . Ali ys April 19, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 26, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-3 -- REPEAL OF BILTMORE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends a comprehensive study of this matter including amendments to Local Coastal Program and certified Land Use Plan .prior to repealing -Specific Plan Area. Background At the Planning Commission's April 5, 1988 meeting the Planning Commission adopted staff's recommendation and voted it to be a low priority. Analysis Refer to attached Planning Commission report. Attachments 1. Staff report of April 5, 1988. 2. Planning Commission Minutes of April 5, 1988. CONCUR: Kevib B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully 7 bmi ted, Mic ael Schubach Planning Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 87- 5092 A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO STUDY REPEALING THE BILTMORE SITE SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED BETWEEN 15TH STREET AND 13TH STREET, AND THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE; COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE "BILTMORE SITE". WHEREAS, the City Council held a hearing on December 15, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of repealing the Specific Plan approved in 1984 for the "Biltmore Site"; and WHEREAS, the repeal of the 1984 Specific Plan will allow the underlying zoning to remain in effect for the subject parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby direct staff to study repealing the 1984 Specific Plan for the Biltmore Site. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1987. PRESIDENT 'of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: 1J/ PPROVED A • FORM CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY GOVERNMENT CODR chat the capital improvement program is 1 Improvement program or any part of the u ovement program or a part of the cap 1 le general plan, any specific plans, and all may overrule the finding and carry out its or annual revisions of the Rrogram, the eatery, and high school district, and each t feast one public hearing. Notice of the, Section . In addition mailed notice eptly affectedby the capita improvement PLANNING ACT [REPEALED] 984 4. 1004 ¢ 16. • ►.Act; section as alternative procedure. ez, 1009,' f 18' On e.117188, in., - s•.lP• ag'eaay may, or if so directed by tielOstie 'bo 1ementation of the general • '6343a1. added by Stats.1965, c. 1880, p. 4342. t :1!lola at Dodd= iltftd s sly► is not required for the land use. . 1 p4la e6optad by a city a musty. 67 assns .addition by amendment GOVERNMENT CODE $ 65453 § 65450.1. Repealed by Stats.1984. c. 1009. § 17 Sec. now, f 65450. § 65451. Required contents (a) A specific plan shall include a text and a diagram or diagrams which specify all of the following in detail: (1) The distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan. (2) The proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan. (3) Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conservation. development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable. (4) A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out paragraphs (1), (2), and (3). (b) The specific plan shall include a statement of the relationship of the specific plan to the general plan. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 18. Amended by Stats.1985, c. 1199, § 5.) 1984 Legislation Former § 65451 was repealed by Stats.1984, c. 1009, f 17. Ser, now. 44 62452, 63434. Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984. c. 1009, see note under Edo. C. 4 39002. Derivation Forma § 63451, added by Stats 1971, c. 1446,82857,§ 10. Nota of Deddaes 1. Is general Adoption of speCi6c land use plan by city council was legislative act subject to referendum. Yost e: Thomas (1984) 205 Ca1.Rptr. 801, 685 P.2d 1132. 36 C.3d 561. § 65452. Optional contents The specific plan may address any other subjects which in the judgment of the planning agency are necessary or desirable for implementation of the general plan. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 18.) 1984 Legblatio. Former 4 65432 was repealed by Stats.1984, c. 1009, s 1446, p. 2857, 4 10. i 17. Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984, c. 1009, see note under Educ. C. 4 39002. Derivation Formai 65451 added by Stats.1971. c.' § 65453. Procedures (a) A specificIlan shall be prepared. adopted, and amended in the same manner as a general p1� except that a spec plan may be adopted by resolution or by ordinance and may Se amended as often as deemed necessary by the legislative body. (b) A specific plan may be repealed in the same manner as it is required to be amended. (Added by Stats.1984, o. 1009, $ 18. Amended by Stats.1985, c. 1199, § 6.) 1984 Legislation Forma § 65453 was repealed by Stats.1984. c. 1009, f 5, amended by Stats.1982, c. 923, p. 3373. § 2. 417. See, now, If 65456, 63457. Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984, c. 1009. see note under Educ. C. 4 39002. Derivadas Former ff 65300 to 63503, 63505. 65507. added by Stats.1965. c. 1880. pp. 4343, 4344, § 5. Asterisks • * • indicate deletions by amendment 84 C4d.Code-9 235 1888 PP. Forma f 63504, added by Stats.1965. c. 1880, p. 4344, § 65302.8 GOVERNMENT CODE § 65302.8. Adoption or amendment of general plan element operating to Unlit number of housing units; findings Notes of Decisions 1. Is gametal Statutes (West's Ann.CaLGov.Code § 65302.8) gas adoption or amendment of general plan element operating to limit number of housing units did not apply to ordinance adopted pursuant to initiative measure which established development allotment system whereby only 100 net dwell - mg units would be permitted each year for to -year period, where ordinance was not amendment to city's general plan. Lee v. City of Monterey Park (App. 2 Dist.1963) 219 CaLRptr. 309. 173 C.A.3d 798. § 66303. Additional elements or subjects permitted as part of plan The general plan may include any other elements or address any other subjects which, in the judgment of the legislative body, relate to the physical development of the county or city. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, f 9.) 1984 I.egW.Noa Former § 65303 was repealed by Stater 1984, c. 1009, § 8. Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984. c. 1009. see note under Educ.0 § 39002. Crass Refuses Geothermal dement defined, see Public Resource Code § 25133. Law Review Comite State preemption of cilia' power to regulate traffic. (1983) 23 Sorts Clara L Rev. 331. § 65303.4. Flood control and land management; development of site design and planning policies by Department of Water Resources The Department of Water Resources and the Department of Fish and Game may develop site design and planning policies to assist local agencies which request help in implementing the general plan guidelines for meeting flood control objectives and other land management needs. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1130, § 1.) 1984 Unlisted= Section 3 of Stats.1984. c. 1130. provides: "This act shall be knows and may be cited as. the Detain Creek Restoration and Flood Control Ad." Keary Refuses Levees and Flood Control 42.4.. States adz. C.J.S. Leven and Flood Control § 13 et seq. CJ.S. Stats §§ 120, 121. 136 to 140. §§ 65304 to 65306. Repealed by Stats.1984, e. 1009, §§ 10 10 12 1984 Leg datlaa See, now. §§ 65351. 65352. Prior to repeal. § 65306 was amended by Stats.1983, c 860 § I. § 65307. Report of city or county planning agency; time of submission Nato of DeeWotts 1. la ga+enl Chaster alta are mot exempt from planning elements prescribed by statutes if general land use plan is adopted under their darter, including had use dement. which ARTICLE 6. PREPARATION, ADOPTION, Section 65350. 65351. 65352. 65353. 65354. 65354.5. includes pope may. drnarhdoo element. and bow- ing dement, which makes adequate provisions far housing needs of all economic segmrata of community. Dateline Builders. Inc. v. City of Santa Rosa (App. 1 Det.1983) 194 CaLRptr. 258, 146 C.A.3d 520. AND AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Adoption and amendment Public involvement. Referral to other agencies. Commission notice and hearing. Commission action. City or county with planning agency; request for hearing by legislative body; notice; fee. Underline indicates changes or additions by ameticiment 226 ,f 'CV!RAIENT CODE !at* t4► Emit number of dlisthw. deed* which established nudes Oa* only 100 nes dwell- **, atdr yew tar. �.yesrw Period. 1 _' cot to dty's general pled '17 pati. (A,pp..2 Dist.1985) 219 3,1.794; spbjegs which, in the the eatnty (or city. Eau' osier 10 regulate traffic. Rev. 331.. 1 - .• cite „daipt and planning ad .Game nay develop site *Implementing the general Cement needs. Coated # 13 d seq. i• • • r, • (F, • !▪ 4lpsildm ttleaest, and boos. tfah= N!n'4im. for bossing sada ar ou•Dateline 4 Sale (App.1 983) 194 tm THE GENERAL PLAN ilaiive bodj; notice; fee. Ons ii amendment GOVERNMENT CODE Section 65355. 65356. 65356.1. 65357. 65358. 65359. 65360. 65361. 65362. Legislative body hearing. Legislative body action. Repealed. Copies of plan; distribution; fees. Amendments. Consistency of other plana. New cities and counties. Extension of deadline. Appeals. Article 6 was added by Stats.1984, a 1009, 1 11 5. Former article 6 was repealed by Stats.1984, a 1009, § 65352 § 65350. Adoption and amendment Cities and counties shall prepare, adopt, and amend general plans and elements of those general plans in the manner provided in this article. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13.6.) 1984 I.eghashoa Former § 63350 was repealed by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13. Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984, c. 1009. see note under Educ.C. § 39002. Desired*: Former § 65350, added by Stats.1965, c. 1880, p. 4338, § 5. Notes at Deedless 1. In general A local government may not approve an alternative use of Williamson Act (§ 51200 et seq.) contract property which is not consistent with its current general plan under the "win- dow" provision of Stats.1981, c. 1095. 67 Ops.Atty.Gen. 247, 6-5-84. § 66351. Public involvement During the preparation or amendment of the general plan, the planning agency shall provide opportunities for the involvement of citizens, public agencies, public utility companies, and civic, education, and other community groups, through public hearings and any other means the city or county deems appropriate. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13.5.) 1984 Legbdatlen Former § 65351 was repealed by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13. See, now, §§ 65090, 65094, 650095, 65353. Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984, c. 1009, see note under Educ. C. § 39002. Derivation Former § 65304, added by Stats.1963, c. 1880, p. 4338, § 5. § 65352. Referral to other agencies Prior to action by a legislative body to adopt or substantially amend a general plan, the planning agency shall refer the proposed action to all of the following entities: (a) Any city or county, within or abutting the area covered by the proposal, and any special district which may be significantly affected by the proposed action, as determined by the planning agency. (b) The local agency formation conunission. (c) Any areawide planning agency whose operations may be significantly affected by the proposed action, as determined by the planning agency. • .• (d) Any federal agency if its operations or lands within its jurisdiction may be significantly affected by the proposed action, as determined by the planning agency. Each entity receiving a proposed general plan or amendment of a general plan pursuant to this section shall have 45 days from the date the referring agency mails it or delivers it in which to comment unless a longer period is specified by the planning agency. This section is directory, not mandatory, and the failure to refer a proposed action to the other entities specifies in this section does not affect the validity of the action, if adopted. Asterisks • • • Indicate deletions by amendment 227 1 65352 GOVERNMENT CODE To the extent that the requirements of this section conflict with the requirements of Chapter 4.4 (commencing with Section 65919), thender Educ. C.adoptionc.Educ. of Chapter 4.4 shall prevail. § 65354. Commission action The planning commission shall make a written recommendation on the adoption or amendment of a general plan. A recommendation for approval shall be made by the affirmative vote of not leas than a majority of the total membership of the commission. The planning commission shall send its recommendation to the legislative body. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13.5.) 1984 Legislation Derlvatioae Forma if 65352, 65353. 65354, added by § Fonner 65354 vas repealed by Stats.1984, c. 1009, Sats.1%5, c. 1880, p. 4339, § 5. Legislative intent relating to Staa.1984, c. 1009, ace note under Educ. C. § 39002. § 65354.5. City or county with planning agency; request for hearing by legislative body; notice; e (a) A city or county with a planning agency, other than the legislative authority to consider and recommend the approval, conditional itself, which hasp the amendment to a general plan, shall establish procedures for �1. or �� of a proposed request for a bearing by the legislative body with its clerk within five daysinterested to to agency acts on the proposed amendment. Notice of the hearingshall be planning given pursuant to Section 65090. (b) The legislative body may establish a fee to cover the cost of establishing the procedures and conducting the hearing pursuant to subdivision (a). The legislative body shall impose the fee pursuant to Chapter 13 (commencing with Section 54990) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5. (Added by Stats.1985, c. 1006, § 1.) § 65355. Legislative body hearing • Prior to adopting or amending a general plan, the legislative body shall hold at least one public hearing. Notice of the hearing shall be given pursuant to Section 65090. (Added by Stats:l9&i, c. 1009, § 13.5.) GOV 1984 Fora § 13. See, §653E The adopt* body. coma previa coma after t for apt (Addeo 1984 Forme § 13. ung Dena 1880, p. § 1. Forme 4 Cross Re Inters; ProPosed § 65351 See, m enfel tities A ProP084 adopter manner C si e public adoptul reason request A plan th (Added •1984 § Forme 13. See, or Asteria titkiatiorr CODS retests of Chapter 4.4 argayey, W. June 28, 5, nddd by' =tata1965. c Si.t tWo, a 1390. p. 3311, o$ILI%S, c. 1880. p. 4338, I91o,p.3312.i3: Stats. .r. &anoe or resolution to dments to the general !commendation on the ter pursuant to Section . added by Stats.1965, c ggorameadment of a 3 Y to of not less than r1epigp shall send its 65333. 19334.. added by titmice; itiatwbkb has the PPM* of a proposed itluto tile a written ,t Pig Way aerie Section 65090. fProtidure-s and l impose the fee vision 2 of Title 5. :r•, • fat lest one public 1: t[' Ili ivy eneindalent GOVERNMENT CODE 1984 Lgislatloa Former § 65353 was repealed by Stats 1984, c. 1009. 1 13. See, now, §§ 65090, 65094, 65095. § 65357 Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984, c. 1009, ser note under Educ. C. f 39002. Derivaliose Former § 65355, added by Stats.1965, c. 1880, p. 4339, § 5. § 65356. Legislative body action The legislative body shall adopt or amend a general plan by resolution, which resolution shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total membership of the legislative body. The legislative body may approve, modify, or disapprove the recommendation of the planning commission, if any. However, any substantial modification proposed by the legislative body not previously considered by the commission during its hearings, shall first be referred to the planning commission for its recommendation. The failure of the commission to report within 45 calendar days after the reference, or within the time set by the legislative body, shall be deemed a recommendation for approval. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13.5.) 1984 Legisladso Fonner § 63356 was repealed by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13. Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984, c. 1009, see note under Edw. C. § 39002. Derivation: Forma § 65356, added by Stats.1965. c. 1880, p. 4339, § 5, amended by Stats 1977, c 45, p. 422, § 1• Former § 65357, added by Stats.1965, c. 1880, p. 4340, § 3. Craw References Interagency referrals, modification and referral back of proposed actions, ser §§ 65919.7. 65919.8. § 65356.1. Repealed by Stats.1984. c. 1009, § 13 See. now, §1 65353, 65354, 65356, 65358. Nota of Decision 1. L general Citizen taxpayer who obtained judgment commanding county planning comminion and board of supervisors t0 apt general plan for county in accordance with judgment was not entitled to attorney fee award, where findings and judgment simply declared duty to comply with clear com- mand of Oov.C. 11 63352 and 65353 and citizen did not, prior to commencing action, complain or suggest correction to concerned county of icisb with respect to revised general plan's shortcoming of not being approved by planning com- mission's "resolution." Grimsley v. Board of Sup'rs of County of San Benito (App. 1 Dist.1985) 209 Cal.Rptr. 587, 163 C.A.3d 672. § 65357. Copies of plan; distribution; fees A copy of the adopted general plan or amendment to the general plan shall be sent to all public entities specified in Section 65352 and any other public entities that submitted comments on the proposed general plan or amendment to the general plan during its preparation. Failure to send the adopted general plan or amendment as provided in this section shall not affect its validity in any manner. Copies of the documents adopting or amending the general plan, including the diagrams and text shall be made available to the general public as follows: (1) Within one working day following the date of adoption, the clerk of the legislative body shall make the documents adopting or amending the plan, including the diagrams and text, amiable to the public for inspection. (2) Within two working days after receipt of a request for a copy of the adopted documents adopting or amending the plan, including the diagrams and text, accompanied by payment for the reasonable cost of copying, the clerk shall furnish the requested copy to the person making the request. A city or county may charge a fee for a copy of the general plan or amendments to the general plan that is reasonably related to the cost of providing that document. (Added by Stats.1984, c. 1009, § 13.5. Amended by Stats.1985, c. 338, § 1.) 1984 LegisVqa Legislative intent relating to Stats.1984, c. 1009, ser note Former § 63357 was repealed by Stats.1984, c. 1009, under Educ. C. § 39002. § 13. Derivatio u Fanner § 65360, added by Stats.1965, c. See, now. § 65356. 1880, p. 4340, § 5. Asterisks • • • Indicate deletions by. amendment 229 May 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 10, 1988 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT POLICY FOR THE SAFE CONDUCT OF VEHICULAR PURSUITS BY PEACE OFFICERS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution. BACKGROUND: On January 1, 1988, Assembly Bill No. 1912 came into effect. This Bill provided for the addition of Section 17004.7 to the California Vehicle Code. This new section provides immunity for a public entity from liability for civil damages for personal injury, death, or property damage resulting from the collision of a vehicle being operated by an actual or suspected violator of the law, pursued by a peace officer, if the public entity adopts a written policy for the safe conduct of vehicular pursuits by peace officers meeting specified minimum standards. ANALYSIS: The Tort Claims Act provides special immunity from civil liability for public entities and their employees. Until the adoption of Assembly Bill No. 1912, a public entity was generally liable for death or injury to a person or property caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the operation of a motor vehicle by an employee of the public entity acting within the scope of employment. The State Assembly, by enacting AB No. 1912, has granted immunity for civil liability in this situation, if the public agency or police department adopts a written policy for safe conduct. Vehicle Code 17004.7 provides in part: (c) If the public entity has adopted a policy for the safe conduct of vehicular pursuits by peace officers, it shall meet all of the following minimum standards: (1) It provides that, if available, there be supervisory control of the pursuit. (2) It provides procedures for designating the primary pursuit vehicle and for determining the total number of vehicles to be permitted to participate at one time in the pursuit. (3) It provides procedures for coordinating operations with other jurisdictions. 1 'Zj (4) It provides guidelines for determining when the interests of public safety and effective law enforcement justify a vehicular pursuit and when a vehicular pursuit should not be initiated or should be terminated. The attached pursuit policy meets all of these minimum standards and we recommend that City Council adopt this policy through resolution. CONCUR: evin B. Northcra?t, City Manager 2 tfull itted, Steve S. Wi iewski Director of Public Safety 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ADOPT A POLICY FOR THE SAFE CONDUCT OF VEHICULAR PURSUITS BY PEACE OFFICERS. WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 1912 provides the addition of Section 17004.7 to the California Vehicle Code; and WHEREAS, a public entity is granted immunity from civil liability for civil damages for personal injury, death, or property damage resulting from the collision of a vehicle being operated by an actual or suspected violator of the law, pursued by a peace officer, if the public entity has adopted a written policy for the safe conduct of vehicular pursuits meeting the minimum specified standards set forth in Section 17004.7. NOW, THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City hereby adopts Sections 507.00 through 507.14 of the Hermosa Beach Police Department Po icy Manual titled "POLICE VEHICLE PURSUITS,"li SECTION 2. That this resolution shall take effect immediately. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City.; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Clerk , City Attorney 507.00 - 507.05 507.00 POLICE VEHICLE PURSUITS 507.01 PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the safe conduct of Police vehicle pursuits requiring emergency operation of departmental vehicles. 507.02 POLICY: It is the policy of this department that a motor vehicle pursuit is justified only when an officer has reasonable cause to stop a vehicle and the driver fails to stop as required by law. 507.03 INITIATING/PRIMARY UNIT RESPONSIBILITIES: The officer initiating a pursuit shall, in all cases, notify the dispatcher that a pursuit is underway and provide the following information: (A) Reason for pursuit, (B) Description of fleeing vehicle, (C) Occupant information, (D) Location, speed, and direction of pursuit, (E) Any other information which may assist in the pursuit. 507.04 ASSISTING UNIT RESPONSIBILITIES: Assistance will be coordinated by the communications center under the direction of the watch commander. 1. The assisting unit may assume radio communications responsibility, allowing the primary unit to devote full attention to driving. 2. The assisting unit will maintain a safe distance behind the primary unit, but be close enough to render backup assistance if and when required. 3. If the primary unit becomes disabled, the assisting unit will become the primary unit. If this happens, a new backup unit will be designated. 507.05 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Receive and record all incoming information on the pursuit and the pursued vehicle. 2. Immediately notify the watch commander when a pursuit is initiated. 3. Clear radio channel of any unnecessary traffic and advise all other units that a pursuit is in progress, providing all relevant information. 507.06 - 507.08 4. If license number is available, determine registration/criminal want information and relay the information to pursuing officers as soon as practical. 5. Coordinate assistance under the direction of the watch commander. 6. Should the pursuit leave the department's jurisdiction, immediately notify the agency of jurisdiction. 507.06 SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES: Upon notification, the watch commander shall assume overall command and exercise control over the pursuit. 1. The supervisor shall verify that: - no more than the required or necessary units are involved in the pursuit. - Aerial assistance, if available and needed, has been requested. - All affected agencies are being notified. 2. The watch commander will direct the pursuit, and approve or order alternative tactics, such as the use of a roadblock, and maintain control until the pursuit is terminated. 3. The watch commander will order the termination of a pursuit, when in his judgement, the necessity of immediate apprehension is outweighed by the level of danger created by the pursuit. 507.07 INTERJURISDICTIONAL PURSUITS: 1. Hermosa Beach Officers shall not become involved in another agency's pursuit unless specifically requested to do so by the pursuing agency and authorized by the watch commander, or unless the emergency nature of the situation dictates the need for assistance. 2. Unless officer safety or a specific request from the originating agency indicate otherwise, Hermosa units shall terminate their participation when the pursuit leaves the City of Hermosa Beach. 507.08 CONTINUANCE/TERMINATION OF PURSUIT: The primary unit officer and the Watch Commander shall weigh the totality of the circumstances and facts available and will limit or terminate the pursuit when the level of danger created by the pursuit outweighs the necessity of immediate apprehension. Some of the factors to be considered when determining to continue or terminate a pursuit are: A. Time of day: High speed pursuits occurring during a time when there is a high level of business, school, or other activity are more hazardous than those occurring during periods of low activity. 507.09 - 507.12 B. Volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic: Pursuits occurring during periods of heavy traffic and pedestrian flow are more hazardous than those occurring at other times. C. Location of pursuit: Pursuits through residential areas or on streets near to or adjacent to school areas are more hazardous than those in lightly populated areas. D. Nature of Charges: Pursuits for persons suspected of involve- ment in serious crimes are viewed as more justifiable than those for persons suspected of only traffic or other mis- demeanor violations. The officer should bear in mind that the cost of vehicle damage or loss of life far outweighs the cost of a $10.00 traffic citation. E. Road Conditions: Roads in poor condition and narrow residen- tial streets are more hazardous than wide roads in good conditions. F. Speeds Involved: The higher the speed, the more hazardous the pursuit. G. Weather Conditions: Dry, clear conditions are less hazardous. 507.09 USE OF EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT: All units involved in a pursuit shall, as soon as practical, activate the red lights and siren. This emergency equipment shall be used continually throughout the duration of the pursuit. 507.10 UNMARKED VEHICLES AND MOTORCYCLES: If a pursuit is initiated by an unmarked vehicle or a motorcycle, that vehicle or motorcycle will withdraw from active pursuit when a four-wheel marked unit is in position to take over active pursuit. The unmarked vehicle or motorcycle may proceed as a support unit only. 507.11 NUMBER OF POLICE VEHICLES: Unless otherwise directed by the watch commander, no more than two (2) police units will become actively involved in the pursuit. Other officers should be alert to and monitor the pursuit progress and locations. All other units will not activate emergency equipment, will not parallel, and will not attempt to join the pursuit unless authorized to do so by the watch commander. 507.12 OVERTAKING THE SUSPECT(S): As a general policy, officers should not attempt to pass or overtake a fleeing suspect. To do so, places the officer in a highly vulnerable position. Generally, the pursuing officer(s) should keep a safe distance from the suspect and merely attempt to kelp the suspect vehicle in sight until the suspect voluntarily stops. All police pursuit vehicles should keep a safe distance apart, particularly at intersections to avoid collisions. 507.13 - 507.14 507.13 RAMMING OR FORCING OFF ROADWAY: Ramming of fleeing vehicles should be avoided. Neither should attempts be made to run the pursued vehicle off the road. If the originating unit believes either of these two steps are absolutely necessary, such action should be taken only in case of major felonies and then only if the character of the roadway, speeds involved, or hazards to other persons are considered and circumstances will justify such drastic action. Authorization should first be given by the watch commander prior to ramming or forcing off the roadway. 507.14 ROADBLOCKS: The use of a roadblock must be authorized by the watch commander. Generally, a roadblock may be employed only as a last resort. The use of a roadblock must be directly associated with the seriousness of the crime for which the suspect is wanted. The roadblock must be clearly visible and provide adequate warning to allow vehicles to come to a safe stop. The roadway shall not be completely blocked unless the use of deadly force would be authorized. May 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS CIP 85-138 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve and adopt the attached Resolution (Exhibit A) authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached Supplemental Agreement (Attachment I, Exhibit A) with CalTrans for CIP 85-138. Background: On October 25, 1977, the City of Hermosa Beach entered into Agreement No. 07-5155 with the State of California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) for the prosecution of Federal -aid projects. This Master Agreement defines general conditions for all Federal -aid projects, and is attached as Exhibit B. Article 2, Paragraph 2 of this Master Agreement states: "The Supplemental Local Agency -State Agreement (program supplement) shall be in a form prescribed by STATE; and shall designate who shall advertise, award and administer the contract, the Federal funds requested, and the matching funds to be provided by LOCAL AGENCY, and, if a State Highway is involved, the matching funds to be provided by STATE. Adoption of the program supplement by LOCAL AGENCY and approval by STATE shall cause such program supplement to be a part of this agreement as though fully set forth herein. Unless otherwise delegated the program supplement shall be approved by the LOCAL AGENCY's governing body..." CalTrans recently submitted Program Supplement No. 01 (Attachment I, Exhibit A) of this Agreement to staff, which applies specifically to the Traffic Signal Improvement project (CIP 85-138). This supplement must be approved by Council and received by CalTrans' Sacramento office by May 30, 1988, or the project may be delayed. 1 2 k Analysis: In summary, this supplemental agreement provides for the following for CIP 85-138: 1. That all maintenance be performed by the City. 2. That the City will advertise, award and administer this project. 3. That the payment of Federal funds be limited to the detail estimate amount approved by the Federal Highway Administration, 4. That the City reaffirms the "Non -Discrimination Assurances" contained in the original Agreement (Exhibit B). Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Modify the Agreement. (This may delay CIP 85-138.) 2. Do not sign the Agreement. (This is not advised, as .it may result in a loss of up to $171,075 Federal funds for CIP 85-138.) Deborah M. Murphy Assistant Engineer Concur: Kevin B. Nort draft City Manager DMM/umv Attachments: Concur: ony Antich Director of Purlic Works Exhibit A - Resolution Exhibit B - Master Agreement No. 07-5155 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Exhibit A RESOLUTION NO. 88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ADD PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 01 TO MASTER AGREEMENT NO. 07-5155 BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS "LOCAL AGENCY", AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "STATE", DATED THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1977. WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has declared it to be in the national interest for Federal funds to be expended for highway, fringe parking, bicycle transportation, pedestrian walkways and mass transportation projects; and WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted legislation by which certain Federal funds authorized may be made available for use on local transportation facilities in accordance with the intent of Federal acts; and WHEREAS, there exists a compelling need for improvements or restoration of roads, streets, highways, fringe parking and public transportation facilities within the boundaries of LOCAL AGENCY; and WHEREAS, LOCAL AGENCY and STATE therefore desire to make use of such Federal funds as may be made available within the jurisdictional boundaries of said LOCAL AGENCY; and WHEREAS, before Federal -aid will be made available for projects, LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into an agreement relative to prosecution of the said project and maintenance of the completed facility. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Article II, Paragraph 2 of Master Agreement No. 07-5155 requires adoption of the program supplement by LOCAL AGENCY and approval by STATE, and that such program supplements become a part of this Master Agreement as though fully set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The Mayor of the City of Herosa Beach shall sign Program Supplement No. 01 (Attachment I) to Master Agreement No. 07-5155. SECTION 2. Program Supplement No. 01 is now a part of Master Agreement No. 07-5155. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , CITY CLERK RM: , CITY ATTORNEY Attachment I PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 01 DIST. 07 -LA-0-HmB TO LOCAL AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT 'FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS NO. 07-5155 PROJECT NO. MG -3041 (270 ) EA: x'29 3 , DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1988 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency -State Agreement for Federal -Aid which was entered into between the LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE on 10/25/77 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article 11 of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the LOCAL AGENCY on (See copy attached). The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project. it accepts and will comply with the convenants or remarks set forth on the following pages• PROJECT LOCATION: VARIOUS LOCATIONS TYPE OF WORK: TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES) PROJECT X CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING WORK: RIGHT-OF-WAY x CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING x (Other) CONSTRUCTION TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FEDERAL FUNDS MATCHING FUNDS $171,075 $171,075 LOCAL: 0 OTHER: OTHER: OTHER. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By Date By District Director of Transportation (Title of Authorized Official) Attest District -07 Date 1 hereby Cer ' upo. (Title) my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are Accounting Officer available for this >6/Ot) Date • encumbrance $J7, o75ex Chapter atutes Item Fiscal Yr. Program BC Category Fund Source $ /3 S /%7 , ,t/,f9_ .) so /9,7-0 ,�Yv o%a leo G 2..z,ozv F92/4/3- i71o75cv F.C. - OLSR 16 (REV. 4/87) Dist.: 07-LA-0-HmB FEBRUARY 5, 1988 Proj.# MG -3041(270) Page 2 of 2 SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article VI MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be performed by the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the completed improvements. 2. The CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH will advertise, award and administer this project. The City will obtain State's cdncurrence prior to either award or rejection of contract. 3. In awarding, or agreeing to award the contract, the Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the detail estimate amount approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2), or its modification PR -2A, and accepts any increases in Local Agency funds. 4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal -Aid Program. Exhibit B LOCAL AGENCY -STATE IGREEEENT FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS ORIGINAL 0( Los Anjteies Hermosa Beach District County City AGREEMENiT NO. 07-5155 MASTER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate this 25th day of October , 1977, by and between the Citof Hermosa Beach , political subdivision(s) of the State of California ereinafter referred to as "LOCAL AGENCY", and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, herinafte r referred to as "STATE". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has declared it to be in the national interest for Federal Funds to be expended for highway, fringe parking, bicycle transportation, pedestrian walkways, and mass transportation projects; and WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted legislation by which certain Federal funds authorized may be made available for use en local transportation facilities in accordance with the intent of Federal acts; and WHEREAS, there exists a compelling need for improvements or restoration of roads, streets, highways, fringe parking, and public transportation facilities within the boundaries of LOCAL AGENCY; and WHEREAS, LOCAL AGENCY and STATE therefore desire to make use of such Federal funds as may be made available within the jurisdictional boundaries of said LOCAL AGENCY; and WHEREAS, before Federal -aid will be made available for projects, LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into an agreement relative to prosecution of the said project and maintenance of the completed facility. DH -OLA 255 (4-77) THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I - CONDITIONS 1. Projects located in urbanized areas (unless exempt) must be part of a program which serves to implement an areawide plan held currently valid by the regional transportation policy board. 2. Federal funds may participate only in work which has been officially programmed to and authorized by the Federal Highway Administration in advance of its performance. 3. Funds apportioned such as the STATE's share of FAS funds are considered Federal -aid funds. ARTICLE II - IMPROVEMENTS/RESTORATIONS 1. The term "IMPROVEMENT" or "RESTORATION" as used herein means any work that is financed in part with Federal funds. 2. The Supplemental Local Agency -State Agreement (program supplement) shall be in a form prescribed by STATE; and shall designate who shall advertise, award, and administer the contract, the Federal funds requested, and the matching funds to be provided by LOCAL AGENCY, and, if a State Highway is involved, the matching funds to be provided by STATE. Adoption of the program supplement by LOCAL AGENCY and approval by STATE shall cause such program supplement to be a part of this agreement as though fully set forth herein. Unless otherwise delegated the program supplement shall be approved by the LOCAL AGENCY's governing body. Cooperative projects including work on a State highway shall be the subject of a separate cooperative agreement. 3. In processing•IMPROVEMENTS or RESTORATIONS, LOCAL AGENCY will conform to all STATE statutes, regulations and procedures re- lating to the Federal -aid program and to all applicable Federal laws, regulations, and policy and procedural or instructional memoranda. This includes, but is not limited to, the holding of public hearings when required, the publishing of various press notices, and the pre- paration of plans, specifications, and estimates. 4. Unless otherwise designated in the approved program supple- ment, improvements will be constructed by contract in accordance with Certification Acceptance procedures approved by the FHWA. Such pro- cedures require the use of Specifications described in the State's Certification; STATE approval of plans, special provisions and esti- mated costs prior to advertisement; a certification by LOCAL AGENCY with respect to the right-of-way; and advertisement for a minimum of 3 weeks prior to bid opening. The contract will be awarded by LOCAL AGENCY, its agent, or by STATE as may be determined between the parties prior to each project advertisement. 5. When the IMPROVEMENT or RESTORATION; includes work to be performed by a railroad, the contract for such work shall be entered into by LOCAL AGENCY or by STATE, as parties hereto agree. A con- tract entered into by LOCAL AGENCY for such work must have prior approval of STATE. In either event, LOCAL AGENCY shall enter into an agreement with the railroad providing for maintenance of the pro- tective devices or other facilities installed under the service contract. 6. LOCAL AGENCY shall provide or arrange for adequate super- vision and inspection of each improvement, including contracts awarded by STATE. With prior State approval, surveying, inspection and test- ing may be performed by a consulting engineer provided an employee of LOCAL AGENCY is in responsible charge. 7. STATE shall exercise general supervision over Federal -aid improvements and may assume full and direct control over the project whenever STATE, at its sole discretion, shall determine that its responsibility to the United States so requires. LOCAL AGENCY contracts shall so stipulate. ARTICLE III - RIGHTS-OF-WAY 1. No contract for the construction of a Federal -aid IMPROVE- MENT or RESTORATION project shall be awarded until the necessary rights-of-way have been secured. Prior to the advertising of a pro- ject on a local street; LOCAL AGENCY shall certify and upon request shall furnish STATE with evidence that necessary rights-of-way are available for construction purposes or will be available by the time of contract award. 2. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to hold STATE harmless from any lia- bility which may result in the event the right-of-way is not clear as certified. The furnishing of right-of-way as provided for herein includes, in addition to all real property required for the improve- ment free and clear of obstructions and encumbrances affecting the proposed project, the payment as required by applicable law of dam- ages to real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by the proposed improvement. LOCAL AGENCY shall pay from its funds any costs which arise out of delays to the contractor because utility facilities have not been removed or relocated, or because rights-of- way have not been made available to the contractor for the orderly prosecution of the work. 3. Subject to STATE approval and such supervision over LOCAL AGENCY's right-of-way acquisition procedures as STATE may determine is necessary, LOCAL AGENCY may claim reimbursement from Federal funds for expenditures to purchase rights-of-way included in an approved project. 4. The LOCAL AGENCY will comply with Title II and III of the Uniform Real Property Acquisition Policy. 5. Whether or not Federal -aid is to be requested for right-of- way, should LOCAL AGENCY, in acquiring right-of-way for a Federal -aid IMPROVEMENT, displace an individual, family, business, farm operation, or non-profit organization, relocation payments and services will be provided as set forth in Chapter 5 of Title 23, U.S. Code. The public will be adequately informed of the relocation payments and services which will be available, and, to the greatest extent practicable, no person lawfully occupying real property shall be required to move from his dwelling or to move his business or farm operation without at least 90 -days written notice from the LOCAL AGENCY. LOCAL AGENCY will pro- vide the State with specific assurance, on each project, that no person will be displaced until comparable decent, safe and sanitary replace- ment housing is available within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, and that LOCAL AGENCY's relocation program is realistic and is adequate to provide orderly, timely and efficient relocation of displaced persons for the project as provided in FHP'' 7-5. ARTICLE IV - FISCAL PROVISIONS • 1. When a Federal -aid IMPROVEM?ENT or RESTOPATIOU contract is to be awarded by STATE, matching funds will be provided by LOCAL AGENCY prior to the time that such funds are required to reimburse contractor. STATE will bill LOCAL AGENCY for amount due immediately following con- tract award, or at option of LOCAL AGENCY, will submit monthly bills during life of contract. 2. The estimated total cost of Federal -aid projects, the amounts of Federal -aid programmed, and the matching amounts agreed upon may be adjusted by mutual consent of the parties hereto, provided funds are available to cover increases and provided Federal Highway Administration concurs in any increase in the Federal -aid. 3. Upon submittal by LOCAL AGENCY of a statement of expenditures for Federal -aid improvements, STATE will pay its agreed share and if permitted by State Law will advance an amount equal to the legal prn rata Federal share of the costs believed to be eligible for participa- tion with Federal funds or will voucher Federal Highway Administration for reimbursement. 4. LOCAL AGENCY shall use its own funds to finance the local share of eligible costs and expenditures ruled ineligible for financ- ing with Federal funds. STATE shall make preliminary determination of eligibility for Federal fund financing. Ultimate determination shall rest with the Federal Highway Administration. Any overpayment of amounts due shall be returned to STATE upon demand. 5. When any portion of a LOCAL AGENCY project is performed by STATE, charges therefor shall include assessment on direct labor costs in accordance with Section 8755.1 of the State Administrative Manual. The portion of such charges not financed with Federal funds shall be paid from funds of LOCAL AGENCY. 6. Should LOCAL AGENCY fail to pay nonies due STATE within 30 days of demand or within such other period as may be agreed between the parties hereto, STATE, acting through State Controller, may with- hold an equal amount from future apportionments due LOCAL AGENCY from the Highway Users Tax Fund. 7. Auditors of STATE and the United States shall be given access to LOCAL AGEUCY's books and records and shall be given such assistance and information as is requested for the purpose of checking costs paid, or to be paid by STATE hereunder. ARTICLE V - MISCELLANJEOUS PROVISIONS 1. This agreement shall have no force or effect with respect •to any project unless and until said project has been authorized by the Federal Highway Administration and a Program Supplemental Agree- ment has been executed. 2. The Congress of the United States, the Legislature of the State of California, and the Governor of the State of California, each within their respective jurisdiction, have prescribed certain employment practices with respect to contract and other work financed with Federal or State funds. LOCAL AGENCY shall insure that work per- formed under this agreement is done in conformance with rules and regulations embodying such requirements where they are applicable. Nondiscrimination Assurances, Exhibit "A", are hereby considered a part of this agreement. 3. When Federal funds are to participate in the cost of work done by a consultant, the agreement or contract with the consultant may not be executed or awarded until the selection of the consultant and the terms of the agreement or contract have been approved by STATE. Such agreement or contract shall include a provision thet the work and records of the consultant are subject to inspection at all times by representatives of LOCAL AGENCY, STATE and the Federal Highway Administration and that agreement or contract may be terminated by LOCAL AGENCY upon a finding that the consultant is failing to live up to the terms of the agreement or contract. All major changes in the agreement or contract must have prior approval of the STATE. As soon as agreement or contract with consultant has been awarded, two certified copies of said agreement or contract shall be submitted to STATE. 4. LOCAL AGENCY and its contractors shall retain all orginal records and documents relating to work hereunder financed in part with Federal funds and shall make same available for inspection by STATE and Federal representatives upon request. Following final settlement of the project accounts with the Federal Highway Admini- stration, such records and documents may be microfilmed at the option of LOCAL AGENCY, but in any event shall be retained for a three-year period after FHWA payment of final voucher, or a four-year period from the date of final payment under the contract, whichever is longer. 5. (a) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any- thing done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to LOCAL AGENCY under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, LOCAL AGENCY shall fully indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to LOCAL AGENCY under this agreement. (b) Neither LOCAL AGENCY nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction not delegated to LOCAL AGENCY under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully indemnify and hold LOCAL AGENCY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction not delegated to LOCAL AGENCY under this agreement. ARTICLE VI - MAINTENANCE 1. Upon acceptance by the awarding authority of a completed Federal -aid project or upon the contractor being relieved of the responsibility for maintaining and protecting a portion of the work, the agency having jurisdiction over the transportation facility shall maintain the completed work in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of the State and the United States. If, within 90 days after receipt of notice from STATE that a project on a transportation facility under its jurisdiction or any portion thereof, is not being properly maintained, LOCAL AGENCY has not satisfactorily remedied the conditions complained of, the approval of further Federal - aid projects of LOCAL AGENCY will be withheld until the project shall have been put in a condition of maintenance satisfactory to STATE and the Federal Highway Administration. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a transportation facility which has been vacated through due process of law. 2. The maintenance referred to in paragraph 1 above includes not only the physical condition of the facility but its operation as well. Traffic Operations Improvements on local streets shall be main- tained by an adequate and well-trained staff or traffic engineers and technicians. Said maintenance staff may be employees of a LOCAL AGENCY, another unit of government of a consultant under contract with a LOCAL AGENCY. 20-76620 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers. -STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 07. 7'//j ) By ( 1.�; B , broom District Director o Transportation y , May, r CITY OF THERI'.MOSA BEACH Approval Reconrnended: _= t " '' l 1 Local Assistance Tngi neer • DH -OLA 255 (4-77) -8- ATTEST: %3,1-,/-r « ity er OUtffXxO.Rxxxxx; Byx (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxxu2r,z, Uasr..man;Y.Bsza f- upQr,Y.i x AUESTIxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx iTy OF he atck:eir EEMXir CALIFORNIA 90254 CIVIC CENTER HERMOSA BEACH TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) CITY HALL: (213) 376.6984 POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS: 3 7 6- 7 9 8 1 I, BARBARA FLEMING, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and correct copy of the action taken by the City Council and set forth in the minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach held on October 25, 1977: "to approve Local Agency -State Agreement No. 07-5155 for Federal -Aid Projects - City of Hermosa Beach/State of California, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign on behalf of the City. Motion by Mayor Tyson - Seconded by Councilman Widman Carried Ayes: Councilpersons Barks, Doerfling, Schmeltzer, Widman, Mayor Tyson Noes: None Absent: None" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 31st day of October., 1977, and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hermosa Beach. (SEAL) j�17 / lc 11-1-.e, %" c�',I?t cn CITY CLERK, City of Herl>osa Beach 7 May 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO LOOK AT WAYS TO ALLOW 30 FT. HEIGHT IF VIEW BLOCKAGE OCCURS IN AREAS SUBJECT TO REZONING. INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends that the attached Resolution of Intent be adopted. Background At their meeting of April 26, 1988 the City Council directed staff to return with a Resolution of Intent that would direct Planning Commission and staff to look at ways to allow 30 ft. height if view blockage occurs in areas subject to rezoning. Analysis Through the course of two public hearings, the Council has been enlightened of a potential problem that may result as a product of rezoning. Specifically, view blockage was a dominant complaint of the citizens. Therefore, staff is being directed to study the situation further. CONCUR - Michael c ubach Planning Director Kevin B. Noithcraft City Manager 1 Respectfully submitted, Lrnandez )144A ex Assistant Planner 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10� 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 88- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO STUDY MEANS OF ALLOWING 30 FT. HEIGHT IF VIEW BLOCKAGE OCCURS IN AREAS SUBJECT TO REZONING. C -4- WHEREAS, at the May 10, 1988 Ci y Council meeting, the City Council requested a Resolution of In ent to study means of of allowing 30 ft. height if view block ge occurs in areas subject to rezoning and made the following Finding: 1. The City Council is desirous f studing remedies for the potential view blockage that ay occur as a result of rezoning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby direct the Planning Commission and staff to study way to allow 30 f ;eigbt i1.yiew blo ka a occurs ras subje;zoning/ PASSED, APPROVE AND ADOPTE this 10th day o 'a 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: PPROVED AS 0 r0,4/ CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Jan Tyler Duncan 640 Braeholm Place Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Lawn cLl /44.,.14,o s at 1&<A: .e'er- C- ' •�"� Lle.e4e,A,F Ch24-41"--'° 4;t- ,40 -45A -H) iit,e"'‘'# INFORMATION SUPPLE33ItNTAL Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88-1 May 3, 1988 Regular Meeting of May 10, 1988 LOCATION: 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, TRACT 28895 APPLICANT: JAMES D. COLLIS 651 15TH STREET MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 REQUEST: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SIX FOOT (6') WALL ALONG THE SIDEYARD OF A CORNER LOT Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution confirming denial of the variance request. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, denied the variance request to allow a six foot wall along the sideyard of a corner lot rather than the allowable thirty-six inches. At this meeting, the Planning Commission approved a recommendation to City Council to refund the applicant's variance application fees ($550.00). Abstact The Planning Commission denied the variance because they were unable to establish the required findings to justify granting the variance to allow the wall to exceed the allowable height within a side yard. Analysis The Planning Commission motioned to recommend the City Council refund the applicant's fees based on testimony from the applicant that he has received wrong information from Building and Planning Departments. The Building Department states that the applicant never was given a permit to construct the wall. Also, the original plans approved for the remodel of the home involved only a minor remodel. Upon inspection by a building inspector, it was discovered that the dwelling was almost completely demolished. The applicant was required to revise his building plans. The Planning staff also disagrees with the applicant's testimony. He states he was never given any indication that his variance 1 would be denied. Upon submittal of any variance application, staff outlines the required findings to approve a variance and the applicant is given a copy of a variance procedure handout which outlines the required findings. Also, at the Staff Environmental Review Meeting, the applicant was advised of the difficulty in determining the required findings for approving the variance. The motion by Mr. William Grove states "...this situation is not unique and therefore, justifiable findings are impossible." (See attached Staff Review minutes). Staff disagrees with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to refund the property owner's variance applicaftion fees. The applicant was not ever led to believe that his variance would be granted. Additional analysis is provided in the Planning Commission staff report of April 5, 1988. Attachments 1. Resolution 88- confirming the Planning Commission decision to deny the variance request. 2. Resolution 88- approving the variance request on appeal. 3. Resolution P.C. 88-32 denying the variance. 4. Background a. P.C. Staff Reports of 4/5/88 b. P.C. Minutes of 4/5/88 c. Application d. Public Notice Affadivit CONCUR: Mic ea Schu»ac Planning Director Kevin B. Northctaft City Manager 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ON APPEAL A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A WALL TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIDEYARD SETBACK OF A CORNER LOT AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, TRACT 28895 AND TO DENY THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO REFUND THE VARIANCE APPLICATION FEES. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public bearing on May 10, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The applicant is proposing to construct a wall varying in height from four feet to six feet within the sideyard of a corner lot. B. The zoning ordinance prohibits fences from exceeding thirty-six inches within the sideyard of a corner lot. C. There are no unusual features of size, shape, or topography which justify granting a variance for this property. D. The applicant was well advised of the need to determine the required findings that justify granting a variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY DENY A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A WALL TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIDEYARD OF A CORNER LOT AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE AND TO DENY THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REFUND THE APPLICANT'S VARIANCE APPLICATION FEES. .. PASSED, APPROVED, and APOPTED this day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: A/pers2919 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 -12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A WALL TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIDEYARD SETBACK OF A CORNER LOT AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, TRACT 28895. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 10, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. (TO BE COMPLETED UPON FINDING ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL) B. C. D. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A WALL TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIDEYARD OF A CORNER LOT AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE. PASSED, APPROVED, and APOPTED this day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: .11 APPROVED AS TO FORM: A/pers2919 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A WALL TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT WITHIN THE SIDEYARD SETBACK OF A CORNER LOT AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, TRACT 28895. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 5, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The applicant is proposing to construct a wall varying in height from four feet to six feet within the sideyard of a corner lot. B. The zoning ordinance prohibits fences form exceeding thirty-six inches within the sideyard of a corner lot. C. There are no unusual features of size, shape, or topography which justify granting a variance for this property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby deny a variance to allow a fence to exceed the maximum allowable height within the sideyard setback of a corner lot at 2919 Hermosa View Drive. VOTE: AYES: Comms.DeBellis,Ingell,Peirce NOES: Comm. Rue,Chmn.Compton ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None I here true C CERTIFICATION 4.1 certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-32 is a d .mplete record of the action taken by the Planning of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their ee ril 5, 1988. era • Compton, Chairman Michael`Schubach, Secretary ��%moo Date 5 • atkgrcruitii C C March 29, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission April 5, 1988 SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88-1 LOCATION: 2919 HERMOSA AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, TRACT 28895 APPLICANT: JAMES D. COLLIS 651 15TH STREET MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 REQUEST: TO ALLOW A 6' WALL ALONG THE SIDEYARD OF A CORNER LOT Recommenation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the request to allow a 6' wall along the sideyard and determine if a study to amend the present requirement is needed. Background The Staff Review Committee at their meeting of February 18, 1988, recommended a negative declaration for this project and recommended that the Planning Commission review the code section on fences for corner lots since this situation is not unique butjustifiable findings are impossible. Analysis Section of 1215 of the Zoning Ordinance allows a fence along the street sideyard of a corner lot to be a maximum of 36 inches. The applicant is proposing to construct a wall from 4 feet to 6 feet along the street sideyard. The single family ,dwelling at the site is presently under construction. The design of the dwelling has it's main entrance along Thirtieth Street where the fence is being proposed. The grade of the sidewalk along Thirtieth Street drops about 8 feet from the front to the back of the site. A portion of the finished floor of the dwelling is below the sidewalk. Staff cannot determine any unusual circumstances.that justify granting the variance. The site is typical of most corner lots in the vicinty. The applicant states reasons for requesting the variance are privacy and to prevent litter from being thrown into the yard. Owners of every lot in town would be desirous of attaining these goals. 6 2929 Hermosa View Drive - Continued C The Building Director is recommending that the Planning Commission review the fence requirements for corner lots. Requests for a six foot wall on corner lots is n ual. CONCUR- Michea 'Schu•ach Planning Director Andrew Perea Associate P1:,nner C VARIANCE TO EXCEED MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT OF WALL IN SIDEYARD AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated March 29, 1988. The review committee at their meeting of February 18, 1988, recommended a negative declaration for this project and recommended that the Planning Commission review the code section on fences on corner lots since this situation is not unique, but justifiable findings are impossible. Section 1215 of the zoning ordinance allows a fence along the street sideyard or a corner lot to be a maximum of 36 inches. The applicant is proposing to construct a wall four feet to six feet along the street sideyard. The single-family dwelling at the site is presently under construction. The design of the dwelling has its main entrance along 30th Street where the fence is being proposed. The grade of the sidewalk along 30th Street drops about eight feet from the front to the back of the site. A portion of the finished floor of the dwelling is below the sidewalk. Staff cannot determine any unusual circumstances that justify granting the variance. The site is typical of most corner lots in the vicinity. The applicant states reasons for requesting the variance are privacy and to prevent litter from being thrown into the yard. Owners of every lot in town would be desirous of attaining these goals. The Building Director recommended that the Planning Commission review the fence requirements for corner lots. Requests for six-foot walls on corner lots are not unusual. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission deny the request to allow a six-foot wall along the sideyard and to determine whether a study to amend the present requirement is necessary. Public Hearing opened at 11:56 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Jim Collis, currently living at 651 15th Street, Manhattan Beach, applicant, addressed the Commission. He stated that he has lived in the home since it was built in 1965. He decided to do some extensive remodeling. At the time it was planned, he was advised that there would not be a problem with the wall along 30th Street. He took out a building permit. During the course of construction, the building inspector came out and informed him that he was given incorrect information in regard to the wall. He was then advised to go before the Planning Commission to request a variance. dr. Collis felt that the City should be trying to encourage the use of usable sideyards. He said he could have built to within five feet of the City sidewalk; however, he didn't do that because he wanted to use the sideyard as well as the other parts of the yard in the rear. Mr. Collis stated that this situation is unique, in that the property fronts on Hermosa View Drive, the property backs up to Ardmore, and the side is on 30th Street. The main access is from Hermosa View Drive, not 30th Street. Mr. Collis noted that there is an extreme grade difference from Hermosa View Drive to Ardmore Avenue. Effectively, if a six-foot wall were built according to the code, it would be within five feet of the building. There would then be five feet inside the fence, and five feet outside the fence. There would then be two areas not usable for anything. He currently has a five-foot sideyard on the southerly side of the home which is good only to walk down the side of the house. P.C. Minutes 4/5/88 c Mr. Collis stated that it would be good planning to encourage the use of sideyards. He circulated a petition within the neighborhood, and there were no objections to his proposal. He noted that there are other houses in the area with walls as high as ten feet. He feels that the proposed wall is consistent with the area. He noted that there is heavy traffic on the streets surrounding his property. Also, there is a lot of trash thrown from cars by people in the area. He is trying to create more privacy. Mr. Collis stated that he is not requesting that the entire length of the property have a six-foot wall. He wanted two walls, one about 32 feet, the other about 28 feet. The length is approximately 100 feet. There will also be an extensive amount of landscaping at the property. He stated that he plans to build a sloped wall. There are also two 35 - foot trees which will soften the effect. He plans landscaping on the inside of the wall. He said that there are other homes built to within five feet of the property lines having quite an impact. His project is almost eight and a half feet from the sidewalk. Mr. Collis stated that he did not try to maximize the building on the lot. He wanted to maintain open space, and he would like to maintain privacy in his yard. Mr. Collis said that there are duplexes across the street where people have parties all the time and they throw trash. Those people also park on the lawn and it is very unsightly. Therefore, he would like to build the wall. He stated that by not allowing the wall, a non-use is being created. Chmn. Compton noted concern over setting a precedent in regard to allowing this wall. Public Hearing closed at 12:13 A.M. by Chmn. Compton. Comm. Rue asked questions about the height of the wall. Chmn. Compton asked who gave the applicant the information about this wall. Mr. Collis stated that the Planning Department did not even know that the ordinance existed. A building permit for the project was taken out. He then requested that a building inspector come out to inspect the framing. At that time, he was informed that the wall was not allowed because a mistake had been made. The applicant was then advised to appear before the Planning Commission to request a variance. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded..by Comm. Ingell, to accept staff's recommendation, Resolution P.C. 88-32, to deny the variance for a six-foot wall at 2919 Hermosa View Drive, based on the fact that the appropriate findings cannot be made. Comm. Ingell did not feel that the appropriate findings could be made to grant this variance. Mr. Collis was permitted to again address the Commission to explain why he feels the variance should be approved. Comm. Rue felt that the fact this lot is surrounded by three streets is unusual. He felt that a mitigating circumstance might be the fact that the six-foot wall would not go out to the property line on Ardmore. Chmn. Compton stated that he would vote against the motion, explaining that he feels walls in excess of three feet should be allowed in the City, particularly in cases such as this. P.C. Minutes 4/5/88 • n 4 Comm. DeBellis agreed that there are not many homes fronting on three streets; however, he felt that that is not a particularly germane issue so far as the height of a fence is concerned. Chmn. Compton noted concern that this applicant received the wrong information from the City in regard to the building of this wall. However, he noted that that factor is not compelling to the granting of a variance. Mr. Collis was advised by the Planning Department to apply for a variance. Staff did not indicate to the applicant that there was no possibility of obtaining approval. Mr. Collis stated that the cost for the variance application was $800, and an appeal would be $300. He felt this to be a tremendous financial burden. He felt that the City should allow people to develop their properties within reasonable conditions. Comm. Rue asked whether Mr. Collis would be willing to build a wall under six feet. Mr. Collis stated that he could build a wall four and a half feet; anything less would be pointless. Comm. DeBellis questioned whether vegetation is allowed over six feet. Mr. Schubach stated that he would consult the code to determine the allowable height of vegetation. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Peirce NOES: Comm. Rue, Chmn. Compton ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. Rue, based on the information originally given to this applicant on the original submittal of plans and approvals, and based on his lack of warning that the variance was almost impossible, to recommend to the City Council that this applicant's fees be refunded. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None • =� a — P.C. Minutes 4/5/88 c MINUTES OF THE STAFF REVIEW MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 18, 1988 IN CITY HALL AT 10:00 A.M. =PRESENT: Andy Perea, Associate Planner William Grove, Director of Building & Safety Capt. Vince Bruccolieri, Fire Department Anthony Antich, Public Works Director APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Mr. Perea to approve the minutes of January 21, 1988, second by Mr. Grove. No objections, so ordered. PROJECT VAR 88-1 Variance to exceed maximum allowable height of wall in sideyard at 2919 Hermosa View Drive. Mr. Perea explained that the code but the applicant is requesting a the sideyard. Staff does not see this project. allows for a maximum of 36", wall rainging from 4' to 6' in any environmental problems with Mr. Grove did not see any environmental concerns, but was unclear on how the grade difference reflected ori; the need for the higher wall. The applicant, Mr. Jim Collis replied that he had a list of resi- dents to whom he spoke with, that are not in opposition of the wall. In addition, he passed photographs of the property in question. The grade difference is to create more privacy, and deter passing motorists from throwing litter into the yard. Motion by Mr. Grove to recommend a negative declaration for the project. Mr. Grove also recommended that the Planning Commission review the code section on fences for corner lots for possible amendment, since this situation is not unique and therefore jus- tifiable findings are impossible. Second by Mr. Antich. No ob- jections, so ordered. C C REQUEST FOR VARIANCE APPLICANT: James D. and Sandra C. Collis LOCATION: 2919 Hermosa View Drive 1. Exceptional conditions exist that justify the granting of this request for a variance permitting a wall up to 6 feet in height to be built on the property line of the side yard adjacent to 30th Street. A gradd differential of approximately 15 feet exists between the front property line at Hermosa View Drive and Ardmore Avenue at the rear property line. The lot abuts Ardmore Avenue on the west; 30th Street on the north and fronts on Hermosa View Drive. - Beginning at a distance approximately 16 feet westerly on the front of the garage wherethe intended wall greater than 3 feet would begin, the finish grade at ground level is approximately 4 feet lower than the city sidewalk. The city side walk is approximately 111 feet lower at a point in line with the rear of the house. f 2. Two other properties within the same subdivision, 2920 Hermosa View I Drive and 2921 Braeholm Place, are both corner lots adjacent to 30th St. I These two lots each have retaining walls varying in height up to 6 feet with garden walls on top, thus enabling privacy and useable sideyards. 3. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone. The properties zoned R-2 along the north side of 30th Street would be facing landscaped areas at the front and rear of the property. Two existing Canary Island pines approximately 35 feet high are located in the midpoint hof the lot along 30th Street. 4.. Permitting the variance will not be detrimental to the General Plan. she purpose of the plan is to encourage planned and orderly development. Efforts to permit increased useable areas greater than 5 feet should be encouraged and allowed. ( C J. D. COLLIS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1420 WEST REDONDO BEACH BOULEVARD P. O. BOX NUMBER 2200 GARDENA, CA 90247 323.5070 MIXDOSBUL April 11, 1988 Hermosa Beach Planning Department Hermosa Beach California Gentlemen: Re: Variance 88-1 i(e? /01(1 On April 5, 1988 the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission denied our request for variance to permit the con- struction of a masonry wall varying in height from four to six feet along the street side yard. We are appealing that decision and request that we be heard before the Hermosa Beach City Council. JDC:vr Very truly yours, J.D. COLLIS DEVELOPMENT CORP. C141114.° James D. Collis C April 19, 198'8 City of `.�%rmosarl3eaclt. Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Mr. James D. Collis J. D. Collis Development Company P. 0. Box 2200 Gardena, CA 90247 RE:' Appeal to the City Council of Hermosa Beach of the Planning Commission Decision - Denial of a Variance to Permit the Construction of a Masonry Wall - 2919 Hermosa View Drive, Hermosa Beach, James D. Collis, Appellant Dear Mr. Collis: Your appeal of the subject decision, filed April 12, 1988, has been set for a Public Hearing before the Hermosa Beach City Coun- cil on Tuesday, May 10, 1988 at 8:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. This hearing will be held in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. Legal notification and posting of the property must be done at least 10 days prior to the above meeting. The necessary posters are to be obtained from the City Clerk's office and must be posted on the affected property and the legal notice mailed prior to May 1, 1988. If you wish to submit any written evidence to be considered by the City Council at this meeting, we request that it reach the Planning Department by noon on Tuesday, May 3, 1988 for inclusion in the City Council agenda packets. The Planning Department has requested that you furnish them with eight sets of plans for your requested variance. A staff report may be obtained on/or about May 5 from the Planning Department. Please address any questions to that department at 376-6984, ext. 242. Very truly yours, KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE City Clerk cc: Planning Department City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 3793312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376.6984 • r PROJECT ADDRESS '-9/ y0- hi/ 2 Project Name (If applicable) LEGAL DESCRIPTION L©]-- / T1' +- 1B VIC ZONING /e APPLICANT INFORMATION: /' Name(s)J, 1EE C�9LL-(S Phone A — 2d;241) Mailing Address A.2 i!s f! /c>4 Applciant's Relations • p to Property y UGc/i4 Q APPLICANT'S SI 1X -Q --C C J DATE PROJECT REQUES 7 Conditional Use Permit -Commercial — Conditional Use Permit -Condominium Number of Units jEevelopment Agreement nvironmental Staff Review 'Final Subdivision (Parcel/Tract Map) General Plan Lot Line Adjustment Lot Split Parking Plan Precise Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment Tentative Subdivision (Parcel/Tract Map) Zone Change _1C Zone Variance TOTAL FEES SSD 111 POR OFFICE USE ONLY- Date of submittal: Received by: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Am/.6-Er4 ' k/1. 1✓J12Ldlepe4p oeriST 9e,02,6 AO I n-lC c (attac additional pages if necessary) OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* We/I being duly sworn, depose and say that-we/I are/am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information berewith submitted are true and correct to the b of our/my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 20th day of January , 1988.1988 ��•,�� AOT Y PUBLIC in and for the County of State of California. * Signature required OFFICIAL SE EVELYN -a R NO C•CALIFORNIA ANG uy comm_ezpLei MTis s Address: si •( sr ..OFFICIA{ ditPhonb EVELYN S BECKER NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My comm. mins OCT 20. 1391 from current property owner, not >6 owner in escrow. Y OF HERMOSA BEACH ry C The undersigned are unopposed to the applicant, James D. Collis, from building a garden wall up to 6 feet high along 30th Street at 2919 Hermosa View Drive. NAME ADDRESS L.21-42.3 - Sr. •,tom 11 I V^kV n,l,lc3 603 3o .5-1- i? 8 ;71 ,11 44A-4wqt if 02 9 nGy4red,_ 7%t1,te _ CITY CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa'Beach, CA 90254 LEGAL NOTICE 2919 Hermosa View Drive NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF APPEAL TO THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A MASONRY WALL LOCATED AT 2919 HERMOSA VIEW DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Hermosa Beach, California, will on Tuesday, May 10, 1988, hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for an appeal of a variance to construct a masonry wall varying in height from four to six feet along the street side yard located at 2919 Hermosa View Drive, legally described as Lot 1, Tract 28895, James D. Collis, Appellant. SAID HEARING TO BE HELD at 8:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested in the above matter are invited to participate at that time and place or to write to the Planning Department at City Hall prior to noon on Thursday, May 5, 1988. IF YOU CHALLENGE THIS PROJECT IN COURT, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing [Government Code Section 65009 (b) (c)]). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984, ext. 242. Dated: 4-19-88 KATHLEEN MIDSTORRE City Clerk I; the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the al day of yk9p*z„ , imet deposit into the United States post.office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of corn= petent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Appre executed tbis.declaration on this the S day of , 198y at IIerrnosa Beach, California. State• 'of California ) County of -Los Angeles ) SS On this thp ,5" - day of , 198 , before me,-_ ole . 4w h undersi Bed Notary Public, personall y _appeared y e D. Pi, proved to -me on the basis. �f satisfactory evidence to be the person (s) whose name (s) - Is ' :-_subscr 'bed to' the within. -instrument and: acknowledge •"that--= OFFICIAL SEA . LOIS R. PEEK "gip' s NOTARY PUBLIC • CALUGORNIA Gc'J-'e :";i LOS ANGELES COUNTY g. My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 1988 S..my hand and of, -f icilal .seal Notary 'Public • TO: FROf1: • I am applying for a - at CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH <7;6.-/114F6-.17c�C./S /4 -4/A -41c. - 4l9 Hem- . �. I understand that I am required to past in a clearly .visable location, the public street, or right-of-way, a notice regarding this public meeting/ • • hearing; and.•that I am also responsible for insuring that said notice shall be posted for a minimum of seven (7) consecutive days prior to the meeting. For the meeting listed above, I will post the sign by 4 -247—it I also understand that if it is found that the posting is improper or not maintained during the required period, that the hearing may be continued and I shall hold the City harmless -for said continuance. I also certify that.' am the owner of the property involved in this project, or am authorized by the owner of this property to apply for said project. NAME OF APPLI Gfi; April 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 10, 1988 AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 14 - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt the attached Ordinance. 2. Direct staff to return to Council with a Resolution establishing fees to defray the costs of implementing and maintaining the hazardous materials program established by this Ordinance. • 3. Direct staff to return to Council with an Ordinance providing for the recovery of costs related to hazardous waste or substance spills, releases and other incidents. BACKGROUND: In 1985, the State Legislature added new legislation to the Health and Safety Code relating to Hazardous Materials. This new section, titled "Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory", requires a city or county to develop a plan for the handling of hazardous materials within its jurisdiction. A review of this legislation indicated that it would be in the best interest of Hermosa Beach to administer existing laws pertaining to hazardous materials, and to develop and adopt a local control ordinance. At the regular City Council meeting of November 25, 1986, Council adopted a Resolution designating the Hermosa Beach Fire Department as the administering agency for laws pertaining to the disclosure of hazardous materials in the City limits of Hermosa Beach and directed staff to prepare an Ordinance for local control of hazardous materials. ANALYSIS: With regard to Hazardous Materials, the primary responsibility of the Fire Department is one of information collection, verification, and distribution, as well as hazardous materials plan review. Additional requirements are fee collection, on-site inspection, and disaster contingency planning. The key advantage to local control of hazardous materials is that City Council may, by Ordinance, adopt standards and regulations to meet the unique needs of Hermosa Beach in order to protect the public health, safety, and the environ- ment. 1 Secondly, by having local control, City Council may adopt a schedule of fees to be collected from each business required to submit a business plan. This fee schedule can be set in an amount sufficient to pay for for all costs incurred by the City in carrying out the provisions of the Ordinance. This Ordinance requires the users of hazardous materials to submit a complete disclosure of the amounts and types of materials which is used or handled as well as information for emergency contact and notification. Fire Department personnel will be responsible for the various inspections and record keeping necessary to implement this Ordinance and assure that all busi- nesses handling or using hazardous materials are in compliance. ALTERNATIVE: Relinquish local control of hazardous materials and allow Los Angeles County to be the administering agency. CONCUR: evin B.`Northcra' t, City Manager 2 tfully .ub 'tted, Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 14 - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING AN ORDERLY SYSTEM TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE USE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, AND ESTABLISH A SYS- TEM FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PUBLIC "RIGHT TO KNOW" MANDATES FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, hazardous materials and wastes which are present may pose acute and chronic health hazards to individuals who live and work in this City if exposed to such substances as a result of fires, spills, industrial accidents or other types of releases or emissions; and WHEREAS, it is imperative that emergency service personnel be informed of the use and dangers of hazardous materials in the community in order to plan for and respond to potential emergen- cies and exposure to such materials; and WHEREAS, basic information on the location, type and the health risks involved with the hazardous materials used or stored in the City is not now available to firefighters, health offi- cials, planners, elected officials and other emergency response personnel; and WHEREAS, the system of disclosure set out in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is necessary to provide the information re- quired by firefighters, other emergency service personnel, health officials, planners and elected officials to protect, without abridging the statuatory privilege of trade secrecy, the health and welfare of this City; and WHEREAS, it is recognized that the members of the community should be given basic information on the use and disposal of haz- ardous materials, and the addition of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 14 establishes an orderly system to provide such information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1'0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 14 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby en- acted as follows: CHAPTER 14 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARTICLE 1 In General, Sections 14-1 to 14-5 ARTICLE 2 Hazardous Materials Disclosure, Sections 14-6 to 14-21 Section 14-1 Health Hazards Section 14-2 Informing Emergency Personnel Section 14-3 Basic Information Section 14-4 Disclosure system Section 14-5 Addition of Chapter 14 Section 14-6 Definitions Section 14-7 Standards - Administering Agency Section 14-8 Designation of a Hazardous Material Section 14-9 Users - General Information Required Section 14-10 Users of Hazardous Materials - Disclosure Required Section 14-11 Additional Times Disclosure Required Section 14-12 Exemptions from Disclosure Section 14-13 Disclosure of Information to the Public Section 14-14 Persons Requesting Access to Disclosure Forms - Record Required Section 14-15 Information Regarding Hazardous Waste Section 14-16 Identification Section 14-17 Fees Section 14-18 Approved Lock Box and Location 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 14-19 Section 14-20 Section 14-21 ARTICLE 1 Section 14-1 Trade Secrets Trade Secret Information Request -- User Notification Penalties IN GENERAL Health Hazards Hazardous materials and wastes which are present may pose acute and chronic health hazards to individuals who live and work in this City if exposed to such substances as a result of fires, spills, industrial accidents or other types of releases or emissions. Section 14-2 Informing Emergency Personnel It is imperative that emergency service personnel be informed of the use and dangers of hazardous materials in the community in order to plan for and respond to potential emergencies and expo- sure to such materials. Section 14-3 Basic Information Basic information on the location, type and the health risks involved with hazardous materials used or stored in the City is not now available to firefighters, health officials, planners, elected officals and other emergency response personnel. Section 14-4 Disclosure System The system of disclosure set out in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is necessary to provide the information required by firefighters, other emergency service personnel, health offi- cals, planners, and elected officals to protect, without abridg- ing the statutory privilege of trade secercy, the health and wel- fare of this City. Section 14-5 Addition of Chapter 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is recognized that the members of the community should be given basic information on the use and disposal of hazardous materials, and the addition of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chap- ter 14 establishes an orderly system to provide such information. ARTICLE 2 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE Section 14-6 Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise clearly indicates, the words and phrases used are defined as follows: (a)"Business Plan" urians the separate plan for each facility, site or branch of a business submitted to the Fire Department pursuant to Section 14-10. (b)"Carcinogen" refers to a substance which causes cancer. For the purposes of this chapter, carci- nogens are those substances specified on the list developed by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in its second annual Report on Carcinogens. (c)"CAS number" means the unique identification number as assigned by the Chemical Abstracts Services to specific chemical substances. (d)"Chemical Name" means the scientific designation of a substance in accordance with the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry or the system developed by the Chemical Abstracts Services. (e)"Common name" means a designation of identification such as a code name, code number or brand name used to identify a substance other than by its chemical name. (f)"Disclosure form" means the written information 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 submitted to the Fire Department pursuant to Sec- tion 14-10(c). (g)"Handle" means to use, generate, process, produce, package, treat, store, emit, discharge, or dispose of hazardous material in any fashion. (h)"Handler" means any business which handles hazardous material. (i)"Hazardous material" means any substance or product: (1) For which the manufacturer or producer is re- quired to prepare an MSDS for the substance or product pursuant to the Hazardous Substances Infor- mation and Training Act (Chapter 2.5, Part 1 of Division 5 of the California Labor Code commencing with Section 6360) or pursuant to any applicable federal law or regulation; or (2) Listed in California Health and Saftey Code Section 25316; or (3) Which is listed as a radioactive material set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10, Appendix B, main- tained and upgraded by the Nuclear Regulatory Com- mission; or (4) Which is listed as a legal carcinogen in Title 8, Subchapter 7, Group 16 of the California Ad- ministrative Code; or (5) Which the Director of the Department of Food and Agriculture classifies as a pesticide; or (6) Which the Environmental Protection Agency classifies as a priority organic pollutant. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (j)"Hazardous waste" or "extremely hazardous waste" means any material that is identified in: (1) California Health and Safety Code Sections 25115 and 25117, and Title 22 of the California Administrative Code Sections 66680 and 66684; or (2) The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Sections 261.31 - 261.33. (k)"Health official" means the health officer of the County of Los Angeles or his deputy. (1)"MSDS" means a Material Safety Data Sheet prepared pursuant to California Labor Code Section 6390 or pursuant to the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the United States Department of Labor. (m)"Physician" means any person who holds a valid certificate from the State of California to prac- tice the healing arts. (n)"SIC Code" means the identification number assigned by the Standard Industrial Classification Code to specific types of businesses. (o)"Storage" or "storing" means the containment of substances or materials in a manner which does not constitute disposal of such substances or materials. (p)"Use" includes the handling, processing or storage of a hazardous substance. (q)"User" means any individual, person, trust, firm, joint stock company, corporation, partnership, as- sociation, city, county, district and the state, or 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 14-7 any department or agency thereof engaged in any activity involving the use or handling of a hazard- ous substance or waste. Standards - Administering Agency There is hereby adopted by reference Chapter 6.95 of Division 20 of the California Health and safety code, commencing with Section 255500, establishing minimum statewide standards for business and area plans relating to the handling and release or threatened release of hazardous materials. The Fire Department of the City of Hermosa Beach shall be the Adminis- tering Agency for the provisions of this chapter, and all other applicable statutes promulgated by the federal govern- ment or the State of California. When deemed necessary by the Director of Public Safety, or Fire Chief, the City may adopt and enforce more restrictive regulations for the pro- tection of its inhabitants. Section 14-8 Designation of a Hazardous Material Any material may be added to the list of hazardous materials defined in Section 14-6(i) upon a finding by the Director of Public Safety, the Fire Chief, or his authorized representa- tive that the material, because of its quantity, concentra- tion, physical or chemical characteristics, poses a signifi- cant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to the environment if released. A material added to the list of hazardous materials, pursuant to this article, shall be designated as either a hazardous material or waste. The Director of Public Safety, the Fire Chief, or his authorized representative may use the Uniform Fire Code Section 80 enti- tled "Hazardous Materials" as well as any other nationally 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 recognized reference material to assist him in requiring types and amounts of hazardous materials to be disclosed. Section 14-9 All Users -- General Information Required Upon request, all users shall provide the following information: (a) Any information deemed necessary by the Fire Department for protection of the public health, safety or enviorn- ment; and (b) Any information requested by a physician in order to treat a patient. Section 14-10 Users of Hazardous Materials - Disclosure Required (a) All users shall submit during the month of January of each year a completed disclosure form to the Hermosa Beach Fire Department. (b) Any person who, for the first time during any calendar year, becomes a user or handler of any hazardous material, shall submit a completed disclosure form to the Fire Department within thirty days of becoming a user or handler. Thereafter, said user shall comply with the provisions of Subsection (a). (c) The information required to be disclosed by the Fire Department shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) A copy of the MSDS for every hazardous material used; (2) CAS number; (3) SIC code; (4) United Nations identification number; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1'0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (5) A list of the chemical names and any common names of every hazardous material used; (6) The maximum amount each hazardous material is handled or used at any one time over the course of the year; (7) Specific information as to how and where hazardous materials are handled or used in order to allow fire and safety personnel to prepare adequate emer- gency response plans for the potential release of such hazardous materials. Clear and legible dia- grams and annotated site maps for this purpose; (8) The name, title and 24-hour telephone number of a contact person, and an alternate, representing the business who can provide technical information and assistance in the event of a release or a threatened release of hazardous materials. The contact person shall have full facility access, site familiarity, and authority to make decisions for the business regarding incident mitigation, in conjunction with the Fire Department; (9) An emergency response plan for a release or threatened release of a hazardous material; (10) The characteristics of all hazardous material disclosed including, but not limited to, the degree such material may be toxic, flammable, reactive, and corrosive. Section 14-11 Additional Times Disclosure Required. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Fire Department, when deemed necessary, may give written notice to users and handlers of the need for furnishing dis- closure information within thirty (30) days of any: (a) Significant change in the use or handling of a hazardous material; or (b) New use or handling of a previously undisclosed haz- ardous material; or (c) Change of business address; or (d) Change of business ownership; or (e) Change of business name; or (f) Closure of business. Any user who has previously filed a disclosure form pursuant to Section 14-10 shall submit to the Fire Department a new disclosure form containing the information required by this article. Section 14-12 Exemptions from Disclosure. The following materials, persons or entities shall be exempt from the disclosure requirements of this Chapter: (a) Hazardous materials or substances contained in food, drug, cosmetic or tobacco products. (b) Any person using or handling less than five hundred (500) .pounds, fifty-five (55) gallons or two hundred (200) cubic feet of standard temperature and pressure for compressed gas, whichever is the lesser, of a haz- ardous material per year shall not be required to dis- close such use or handling unless the Director of Public Safety, the Fire Chief, or his authorized representative has given written notice that the weight or volume limits placed on a specified hazardous material have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 been lowered because of public health concerns, or to meet the intent and requirement of Section 80 of the Uniform Fire Code. (c) Any person, while engaged in the transportation of hazardous materials, including storage directly inciden- tal thereto, provided that such materials are accompa- nied by shipping papers prepared in accordance with the provisions of 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Subchapter C. (d) No MSDS shall be required for any hazardous material if such information is not available at the time disclo- sure is required, provided, however, that an MSDS shall be submitted to the Fire Department within fifteen (15) days after receipt by the user. Section 14-13 Disclosure of Information to Public. The Fire Department shall maintain files of all disclosure forms received, and subject to the provisions of Section 14- 19 relating to trade secrets, these files shall be open to the public during normal business hours. Section 14-14 Persons Requesting Access to Disclosure Forms --Record Required. A record of all persons who request access to the hazardous materials disclosure forms shall be kept. Such record shall include: (a) Name, address and telephone number of person/s requesting access, type of identification used for verification of identity (i.e. CDL, picture ID). (b) Name and address of the person, business or governmental agency such person represents; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (c) Identification of the specific file(s) examined or requested to be copied; (d) Reason why person has requested such information. Section 14-15 Information Regarding Hazardous Waste. Upon request, the health officer will make available to the Fire Department and emergency response personnel information regarding hazardous wastes, extremely hazardous wastes, and underground tanks, when such information has been obtained. Section 14-16 Identification. When required by the Director of Public Safety,or the Fire Chief, areas containing hazardous materials shall be iden- tified. Such identification may include signs, color coding, posting lists of materials and material safety data sheets, or other notice deemed necessary. Section 14-17 Fees. (a) A fee to defray the cost of implementing and maintaining the Hazardous Materials Program shall be set by Resolution of the City Council. (b) Any user who fails to file a business plan within the times specified in Section 14-10 shall pay a late filing fee, established by Resolution of the City Council. Such late filing fee shall be in addition to other regularly assessed fees, and shall be submitted with the business plan. (c) A fee to defray the cost of providing disclosure information to a requesting individual, business or governmental agency shall be set by Resolution of the City Council. Section 14-18 Approved Key Box Location. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 When required by the Director of Public Safety, the Fire Chief, or his authorized representative, any user submitting a disclosure form may be required to install an approved key box for emergency utilization of MSDS, floor plans, site plans, and access keys. The location of such key box shall be approved by the Fire Department. Section 14-19 Trade Secrets A user may designate some or all of the information on the disclosure form as a trade secret. As used herein, trade secret shall have the meaning given it by California Govern- ment Code Section 6254.7 and California Evidence Code Section 1060. Any information designated as a trade secret on the disclosure form, or otherwise obtained by the Fire Department or any of its employees, shall not be disclosed to anyone except: (a) To an officer or employee of the City, County of Los Angeles, the State of California, or the United States of America, in connection with the official duties of such officer or employee under any law for the protection of health. (b) To any persons under contract with the City and their employees if, in the opinion of the Director of Public Safety or the Fire Chief, such disclosure is necessary and required for the satisfactory per- formance of a work contract. (c) To any physician when such information is deemed necessary to treat a patient. For the purpose of this article, fire and emergency response personnel and county health personnel operating within the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1'0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 jurisdiction of the City shall be considered employees of the City. Section 14-20 Trade Secret Information Request -- User Notification. When the Fire Department receives a request for release of information to the public, and the Fire Department has been notified by the user that such information is a trade secret, the Fire Department shall give the user written notice by certified mail of such request. The Fire Department shall release the information thirty (30) days after the date of mailing said notice unless prior to the expiration of the thirty (30) days, the Fire Department is informed that the user has instituted an action in court of competent jurisdic- tion for declaratory relief that said information is subject to protection or has obtained an injunction to prohibit dis- closure of such information to the general public. The provision of this Section shall not permit a user to re- fuse to disclose information required to be disclosed under the provisions of this Chapter. Section 14-21 Penalties (a) Any officer or employee of the City, or former officer or employee, who by virtue of such employ- ment or official position, has obtained possession of or has access to information, the disclosure of which is prohibited by this Chapter, and who, and willfully discloses the information in any manner to any person not entitled to receive it, shall be guilty of a MISDEMEANOR, and shall be subject to the provisions contained in Subsection (d) hereof. 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ARTICLE 3 (b) For the purposes of determining a violation, a contractor and any employee of such contractor who has been furnished information pursuant to the pro- visions of this Chapter shall be deemed an employee of the City, and who knowingly and willfully dis- closes such information, shall be guilty of a MIS- DEMEANOR, and shall be subject to the provisions contained in Subsection (d) hereof. (c) Any physician who has been furnished information or who has obtained information pursuant to Section 14-19 and who, knowing that the disclosure of the information is prohibited, knowingly and willfully discloses the information, shall be guilty of a MISDEMEANOR, and shall be subject to the provisions contained in Subsection (d) hereof, unless such disclosure is necessary for the treatment of a pa- tient or for the health and safety of the public. (d) Any person who violates or willfully fails to comply with any provision of this Chapter is guilty of a MISDEMEANOR, and who upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not to exceed Five Hun- dred Dollars ($500) or by imprisonment in the coun- ty jail for a period of up to six (6) months, or both such fine and imprisonment, and each such per- son shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every portion thereof during which any viola- tion of any of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued, or permitted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ARTICLE 3 S CTION 1. The imm iat= enactment of thi ordin ce is n=ces- s -ry to comply wi stat- mandated publ'c right to -know laws re!arding use and disposal of hazardous Materials, and for th saety of the ge eral public and emerg- cy person el, by reaso of government co•e sectio 36937, this ordinance is desi•ned t prosect the he th and s-fety of the citizens o Hermo-a Beach and he geneal public -nd becomes effective 'mmedia'ely upon adopt on o a four-fifths 5) vo of the city •unc Section.' Prior to expiration of fifteen days aft- date of its adoption, the city clerk shall cause a synopsis of the ordinan- cepublished in the Easy Reader, a newspaper of general circula- tion, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. Section,The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Her- mosa Beach. Section/ The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adop- tion of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED A ORM' ATTO Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 18, 1988 Regular Meeting o April 26° 1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO MERGE LOTS - GROUP LM 87-3 AND LM 88-1 LOCATION/ 1214 10TH STREET OWNER: WILLIAM AND MARGARET `SIMAS 1233 21ST STREET JOHN AND BARBARA SB ORB INITIATED BY MAYOR ETTA SIMPSON Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council merrge the lots on appeal pursuant to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-29`of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting' of March 15, 1988, approved the appeal request no merge the sub ect lots. Abstract The Planning Commission decision will allow the property owners to create substandard parcels rather than merging "this lots as intended by the Lot Merger Ordinance. Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 87-3 and LM 88-1 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER' ORDINANCE) and State Government'` Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these', lots to be subject. to merger since less than 80% of the block has been spilt and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The property owners were notified of the aPPeSl by certified mail. Staff cannot determine any reasons to the subject properties from being subject to merger. Additional background and Planning Commission staff 1988. analysis is provided in the 'attached` eports of March 1, 1988 and March 15, Attachments 1. Resolution No. 88- 2. PC staff reports of 3/1/88 and 3/15/88 3. PC minutes of 3/1/88 and 3/15/88 4. Background a. Letter from Mayor Simpson requesting appeal b. Letter to property owners with notification c. Lot Merger Letter 1 d. Intent to Merge Lot e. Appeal of Intent to Merge Lot from Property f. Tax Assessor's Map g. Aerials CONCUR: <7.// Michael Schubach Planning Director 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 of appeal Owners Resp tful Submitted, ea Associate la Andre Pe nner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1233 21ST STREET. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 26, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of, March 15, 1988, approved, on appeal from the property owners, the unmerger of the subject lot\; B. Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Zoning Ordinance perscribes the procedures for the merger of parcels; C. The City Council finds this parcel to be consistent with the criteria for merger: 1. The main structure is sited on contiguous parcels. 2. Not more than 80% of the lots have been unmerged and developed separately. 3. One of the contiguous parcels comprises less than 4000 square feet. 4. The contiguous parcels are held under common ownership. D. The parcels are legally described as follows: 1. 12r - - - - - ac J 1233 21st Street - 57 and 58, Redondo Home Tract; E. The merger of these parcels will preserve the character of the existing neighborhood by maintaining current densities and preserving public on -street parking; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve the merger 1233 21st Street. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONTINUED - Resolution No. 88 - PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this th day of April, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY i Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 23, 1988 Regular Meeting of March 1, 1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS GROUP: LM 87-3 1100-1200 BLOCK OF 9TH AND 10TH STREET REQUEST: TO MAINTAIN PARCELS AS TWO OR MORE LOTS LOCATION: SUBJECT ADDRESS, OWNER, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND ASSESSORS NUMBER 1137 9th Street R.N. Pineda Lots 11 and 12 Block 144 Redondo Villa Tract 4161029010 1214 10th Street Wm. & Margaret Simas Lots 43, 44, and 45 Block 144 Redondo Villa Tract 4161028006 1276 9th Street Martha B. Northup Lots 37, 38, & 39 Block 14$ Redondo Villa Tract 4161030012 Recommendation 1) To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcels as two or more separate lots at 1214 10th Street and 1137 9th Street. 2) To allow the applicant to merge the lots and create two parcels of at least 4000 square feet with a minimum frontage of 40 feet. Background LOT MERGER GROUP 87-3 -Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on December 30, 1987 -Number of notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 33 -Number of hearing requests for appeals received - 3 Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 87-3 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The following information is provided for the specific sites. c c. 1137 9th Street - The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure staddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. On August 12, 1986, the owner was granted a demolition permit for the existing structure and was granted 2 permits for the construction of single family dwellings on July 22, 1986. The applicant has not initiated the demolition and/or construction thus, the permits have expired. 1214 10th Street - The parcels are comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structures staddle the property lines. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. 1276 9th Street - This parcel is comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. The main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single family dwelling. The City of Redonodo Beach has vacated Reynolds Lane and have dedicated 10 feet of Reynolds Lane to the owner of 1276 9th Street. Therefore, the 10 foot dedication, combined with the total area of the three lots, creates a parcel of 8500 square feet. 8500 square feet is enough area to create two parcels conforming to zoning requirements with each parcel maintaining a minimum frontage of 40 feet. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt 1 7 9th Street and 1214 10th Street from being subject to ;rger. Mic ael Schu.ac Planning Director Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerials An •'`''� Per Associate P anner CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission FROM: Andrew Perea, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Addendum to Agenda Item #9 - Lot Mergers Appeal of Intent to Merge Lot William and Margaret Simas 1214 10th Street DATE: March 15, 1988 The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 1, 1988, continued the Intent to Merge request of Mr. Simas, 1214 10th Street, to allow Mr. Simas additional time to prepare for the hearing. The Planning Department has not received any additional material regarding this matter. Mr. Simas has been contacted by telephone and reminded of the continuance of this matter to tonight's meeting. This memorandum was not prepared until today to allow Mr. Simas the full 14 days to prepare written material as directed by the Planning Commission. Attached is a copy of the certificate of receipt of the first letter mailed to Mr. and Mrs. Simas notifying them of the intent to merge lots. Subsequent letters were mailed to their attorney, Laurel Roberts, since the request to appeal was sent by her. Staff assumed that she was representing Mr. Simas in this appeal. IMO 7 PS Form 3800, June 1985 Postmark ' cDale �„✓ _y I TOTAL Postage and Fees, ; 1; ; 1t 1- m3 D� ,0C bE oo' o Retum Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered Restricted Delivery Fee • Special Delivery Fee Certified Fee • et ��y ND I SIT( tid Zt4 No.'Os1 U I Always obtain signature of addressee or agent and DATE DELIVERED. t S 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if requested and fee paid) ' . .. Gid} . Y •4k, x .. •}. t ! 1; 0 ;:, ~' • ] 6. Signature — Agent x G. r r SENDER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items ® and 4. Put your address In the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side.. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you. The return recelat fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and the date of dellvgrv. For additional fees the following services ere available. Consult: service(s) requested. address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery 1(Extra charge)t postmaster for fees and check box(es) for additional 1. O Show to whom delivered, date, end addressee's t(Extra charge)t 3. Article Addressed to:rticie \l r I (fiM etA4AegIRL+ SSM As Number r426.cq; 4/0 6 try , 1os.t • F • ;' ., " ` HE Ci,(vl os.� �r ioG/-1, L �i % 02s 'V ' 4 • �e / it'°' 404,..J' • Type of Service: 0 Registered 0 Insured aCertified 1; . ❑ COD ❑ Express Man' Always obtain signature of addressee or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 5. S natd e — Addressee X VVV 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if requested and fee paid) ' . .. Gid} . Y •4k, x .. •}. t ! 1; 0 ;:, ~' • ] 6. Signature — Agent x 7. Date of i Delivi �� •1�c_)'� � _ S _ _ _ . * ILS.O.P.O.1987.178.268 r--- - "•• 114• DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT eiNg c March 8, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission March 15, 1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS GROUP: LM 88-1 11TH STREET, 11TH PLACE, 7TH PLACE, 24TH STREET, AND 21ST STREET EAST OF PROSPECT AVENUE LOCATION: 1233 21ST STREET OWNER: JOHN AND BARBARA SEYMOUR 1233 21ST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 LEGAL: LOT 57 AND 58 REDONDO HOME TRACT 4184004015 - ASSESSOR NUMBER REQUEST: TO MAINTAIN PARCELS AS TWO OR MORE LOTS Recommendation To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcel as two separate lots. Background LOT MERGER GROUP 88-1 - Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on January 15, 1988 -Number of notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 28 - Number of hearing requests for appeals received - 1 - Number of parcels already split - 17% Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-1 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 8070 of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure staddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt 1233 21st Street from being subject to merger. CO Michae Schu.ach Planning Director Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerial • Ands Pe -a Associate Planner • APPEAL OF LOT MERGER DETERMINATION FOR LOT MERGER GROUP L.M. 87-3 Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated February 23, 1988. For Lot Merger Group 87-3, the Notification of Intent to Merge Lots was mailed on December 30, 1987. 33 notifications were mailed, and three hearing requests for appeals were received. The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in L.M. 87-3 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80 percent of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. Staff cannot find a reason to exempt 1137 9th Street and 1214 10th Street from being subject to the merger. 1137 9th Street: -- Owner: R. N. Pineda. Lots 11 and 12, Block 144, Redondo Villa Tract, 4161029010. (Owner did not appear.) Mr. Schubach noted that the owner received notification of this hearing; however, no further word has been received from Mr. Pineda on this matter. The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single-family dwelling. On August 12, 1986, the owner was granted a demolition permit for the existing structure and was granted two permits for the construction of a single-family dwelling on July 22, 1986. The applicant has not initiated the demolition and/or construction; therefore, the permits have expired. 1214 10th Street: -- Owners: William and Margaret Simas. Lots 43, 44, and 45, Block 144, Redondo Villa Tract, 4161028006. - (1 - PC Minutes 3/1/88 C C The parcels are comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property lines. Building records indicate this structure is a single-family dwelling. Mr. Simas, 1214 10th Street, Hermosa Beach,`. addressed the Commission and asserted that he was not properly notified of the intent to merge his lots. He based his assertion on the. following: (a) notice was sent to his attorney, not directly to him; (b) notification had only his name appearing on it, but his wife is also an owner and her name should have appeared on the letter; (c) there was not adequate time to respond to the letter by the time it was forwarded to him by the attorney. He concluded by stating that he does not want his lots to be merged. Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, stressed that the letter was sent to the attorney, not directly to the Simas', the property owners of record; therefore, there has not been a proper legal noticing in this matter. Mr. Lough explained the legal requirements for this type of action. He stated that appearing at the hearing proves that an owner has been notified and is therefore waiving the right to object on the grounds of improper noticing. Mr. Lough stated that the hearing was requested by theattorney who receivedthe letter on behalf of both property owners. Comm. Ingell questioned whether it is necessary for both property owners to receive notification. Comm. Peirce stated that both owners were notified, stating that the notice of intent went to both Mr. and Mrs. Simas. Mr. Lough stated that the item can be continued if the Commission feels there are any doubts regarding the proper notification of this particular merger. Ms. Burt asserted that this issue was not notified properly. Further, the names of both owners should appear on the noticing. Comm. Peirce stressed that the owner was notified in a proper manner. He further noted that reprographic copies are available which show the noticing to be proper and that the receipt for certified mail was obtained. Mr. Lough explained that the original notice went to the property owner by certified mail, which is the requirement. A letter was then sent to the City by the Simas' attorney. The City mailed a response back to the attorney. At this point, a response does not have to go by certified mail. He noted that, whether Ms. Burt is correct or not in her assumption that the matter was incorrectly notified, she still has the right to challenge the action. The Planning Commission then has the right to weigh the information in determining whether or not the matter should be continued. Chmn. Compton felt that the matter was properly notified; however, he did not object to a continuance of the matter if the applicant so desires. He noted, however, that the owner had only 13 days in which to respond, and the law entitles an owner 14 days. Mr. Simas further objected to the fact that the original letter had an incorrect address on it. - /2 - PC Minutes 3/1/88 C C Comm. Peirce stressed that, in looking at a copy of the notice, the correct address appears on the face of -the notice. Comm. Peirce stated that he would object to any continuance beyond two weeks, noting that he felt the original notice was proper. He felt that two weeks would be an adequate length of time for the applicant to prepare for.the hearing. He could see no deficiencies whatsoever in the noticing. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting of March 15, 1988. No objections; so ordered. 1276 9th Street: Owner: Martha B. Northrup. Lots 37, 38, and 39, Block 143, Redondo Villa Tract, 4161030012. This parcel is comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. The main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single-family dwelling. The City of Redondo Beach has vacated Reynolds Lane and have dedicated ten feet of Reynolds Lane to the owner of 1276 9th Street. Therefore, the ten -foot dedication, combined with the total area of the three lots, creates a parcel of 8500 square feet. 8500 square feet is enough to create two parcels conforming to zoning requirements with each parcel maintaining a minimum frontage of 40 feet. Martha Northrup, 1276 9th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that the hearing notice incorrectly identifies her Block as 144; it is actually Block 143. Ms. Northrup stated that she strongly objects to having her lots merged. She stated that the ten -foot street dedication has enlarged her property. She felt that there should be an exception to the merger of her lots. She felt that mergerr would affect her property value. Ms. Northrup and Chmn. Compton discussed the issue of the ten -foot dedication. Chmn. Compton explained to the owner what the merger would accomplish. Chmn. Compton stated that he has expressed his views in regard to owners who do not want their lots merged.' He stated that he does not want to see development of 19 -foot homes on 25 -foot lots, particularly since it destroys the street parking. He felt that two units should be allowed on two legal lots; but the type of development should in some way be required to allow two units, such as one unit in front and one unit in back so that it precludes the inadequate street parking which sometimes occurs. Comm. Peirce noted that his view remains the same on the lot mergers, stating that if they meet the criteria, they should be merged. He noted, however, that the Northrup property at 1276 9th Street differs from the other properties in this lot merger group. Comm. Rue concurred with the comments made by Chmn. Compton in regard to the parking and visual effect if these lots are merged. He felt that if someone protests the lot merger, that is an adequate reason to not merge the lots, noting that the lots were purchased as two lots and should be allowed to remain as two lots if so desired. He could not condone the City merging lots against the wishes of the owner. Comm. Rue commented that he would like to discuss the issue of design criteria to encourage others types of construction on these types of lots. -13 - PC Minutes 3/1/88 C MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Chmn. Compton to not merge the lots at 1137 9th Street. Comm. Peirce noted that the majority of citizens, as well as the City Council, appear to favor the lot mergers. He felt that the City is going about this issue backwards, in that the Planning Commission is voting politically, and the City Council is voting planning. Chmn. Compton disagreed, stating that this issue has arisen because of the development of these particular types of lots. Comm. Peirce stated that the lot merger ordinance is designed to maintain the neighborhoods in the density condition in which they exist today. By not merging lots, the neighborhoods will be forced to change. Comm. Ingell noted concern that more citizens have not appeared to address this issue. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. DeBellis Chmn. Compton felt that the notice sent out by the City is very intimidating for most citizens. He asked for an update on what happened at the last Council meeting in regard to the issue of the letters being sent out. Mr. Lough stated that the City Council did not feel the notices are intimidating. He stated that official notices from the City are always apt to cause citizens to take pause. Mr. Schubach noted that the letter was approved by the City Council.. Comm. Rue noted that the Planning Commission has been given the authority by the State to not merge these lots if an owner does not want them merged. Therefore, he felt that it is well within the purview of the Commission to grant the wishes of those property owners who do not want to be merged. Comm. Ingell agreed, stating that if the State did not want the Planning Commission to have such authority, the State would not have given it to the Commission. MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to not merge the lots at 1276 9th Street. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. DeBellis Comm. Rue stated that not only is the rationale of his decision to maintain the rights of property owners, but also in looking at the aerials, most if not all of the lots in these areas have been built out to 25 -foot units. He did not see three or four extra units making a significant impact. He fully supports the density proposition EE; however, he felt that people's rights take precedence. Comm. Peirce noted that one of the conditions for merger is if the block is 80 percent built to standard, the lots should not be merged. Staff has not found this to be the case /�►-- PC Minutes 3/1/88 C C is these particular instances. Therefore, either staff is incorrect, or the issue needs to be readdressed. He •noted that staff has asserted that these lots do not meet the requirements for not being merged. Mr. Schubach discussed the criteria for merging, stating that staff is trying to determine the blocks where the percentages are below the 80 percent requirement. He stated that that information can be included in future staff reports. �s' PC Minutes 3/1/88 APPEAL OF LOT MERGER DETERMINATION FOR LOT MERGER GROUPS L.M. 88-1 Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated March 8, 1988. He stated that the first appeal to be considered is that of Mr. Simas. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 1, 1988, continued the Intent to Merge request of Mr. Simas, 1214 10th Street, to allow Mr. Simas additional time to prepare for the hearing. The Planning Department has received no additional material regarding this matter. Mr. Simas has been contacted by telephone and reminded of the continuance of this matter to tonight's meeting. Also, no written material has been received from Mr. Simas on this matter. William Simas, 1214 10th Street, Hermosa Beach, applicant addressed the Commission. He stated that he has no additional information to present; however, he objects to the merging of his lots. He stated that he has no intention of leaving this property, and he objects to the City taking away his property rights and property value. He has three lots and he has no intention of selling them, developing them, or moving away. He stated that he maintains his property in very good condition. Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, attested to the fine character of Mr. Simas and all that he has done for the City. She stated that many people, after paying for a -16- P.C. Minutes 3/15/88 house for thirty years, have no intention of leaving it. She resented the fact that the City is attempting to • merge lots when so much development on Prospect Avenue was allowed. She also felt it is unfair that a citizen as •fine as Mr. Simas should have to come before the City to defend his rights. She felt that the City should leave him alone and allow him to live in peace. Ms. Burt stressed that the 4000 square foot requirement was never intended for the developed lots, but simply for undeveloped land. She pleaded with the Commission to not require Mr. Simas' lots to be merged. Barbara Seymour, 1233 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, asked that her two 25' by 100' lots not be merged. She stated that when they were purchased they were of a legal size. She stated that she and her husband are contemplating retirement soon and they want to have the two separate lots. She stated that the merger would decrease the property value. Comm. Peirce discussed Mr. Simas' lots, stating that there are three separate lots of 20' by 100' feet. He felt that they should be allowed to be made into two lots of 37 1/2' by 100' feet; however, that option is not within the purview of the Commission at this time. He wanted to pass on to the City Council the feeling that if there are three lots of this size, they should be allowed to be merged into two lots of 37 1/2 feet. Mr. Schubach stated that the Commission could request a text amendment to the subdivision ordinance to provide for such an option in the future. Currently, 4000 square feet is required for a lot, and it must have a 40 foot frontage. He stated that other cities have provisions for doing what Comm. Peirce has suggested. If additional wording is added, the applicant could return to request the division into two lots. Chmn. Compton noted that Mr. Simas has three legally constituted lots; if he does not want them merged, then the Commission should not recommend that they be merged. He • stated that his opinion on this matter has not changed. MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to not merge the property at 1214 10th Street, based on the fact that it is a resident owner who has owned it for 44 years; and that if this decision is appealed by the City Council, the Planning Commission recommends that the applicant be allowed to maintain two 37 1/2' lots. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Comm. Rue, to not merge the lots at 1233 21st Street, based on the fact that the property is owned by a resident owner who has owned the property for over 23 years. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to continue the remainder of the agenda to the next meeting. Comm. Peirce noted that he had comments for Commissioner Items. —17 — P.C. Minutes 3/15/88 Tgarftgrouttil March 24, 1988 CIT OF bEWO$J1 3aIKz CIVIC CENTER HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA 90254 CITY HALL: (213) 376-6984 POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS: 376-7981 City Clerk Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear City Clerk Midstokke: request an appeal to the City Council from the decision to unmerge 2 lots made by the Planning Commission on March 15, 1988. Sincerely, Etta Sim son Mayor City o f2-iermosarl3each.) Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DETERMINE WHETHER LOTS SHALL BE MERGED Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Dear Property Owner: The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the parcels described above shall be merged into one parcel according to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. When two or more lots merge, they become a single parcel to be developed, sold, leased, or financed together. Sections 29.5-20 and 29.5-21 allow lots to be merged if two or more contiguous parcels of land are held by the same owner where the following occur: 1. The parcels were created under the provisions the City's Subdivision Ordinance or any prior state law or ordinance regulating the division of land, or which were not subject to any prior law regulating the division of land. • ,2. At least one of the contiguous parcels or units of land held by the same owner does not conform to standards for minimum parcel size to permit use. or development under the City's Zoning and/or Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The main structure is partially sited.on the contiguous % parcel and not more than 80% of the lots on the same block of the affected parcel have been split and developed separately. - 4. One or more of the following conditions exist with respect to one or more of the contiguous parcels: a. Comprises less than 4000 square feet in area at the time of the determination of merger. b. Was not created in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time of the creation. c. Does not meet current standards for sewage disposal and domestic water supply. d. Does not meet slope stability standards. e. Has no legal access which is adequate for vehicular and safety equipment access and maneuverability. f. It's development would create health or safety hazards. g. Is inconsistant with the applicable General Plan and any applicable specific plan, other than minimum lot size or • density standards. Information available to the City of Hermosa Beach indicates that your property meets the criteria for merger. If -you wish to present evidence that the property does not meet the criteria for merger, you may schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission. Your written request for a bearing must be received by the Planning Department within 30 days from the date of this notice. With your request for a.hearing, please include a letter stating the reasons why the property is not eligible for merger. It is the property owner's responsibility to provide a site survey if one is needed to determine the exact location of property lines. If you request a hearing, you will be sent.a letter stating the date, time, and location of the hearing. If you do not request a hearing, a determination of whether or not to merge the parcels will be made by the Planning Department within 60 days of the date of this Notice. A copy of the attached "Intention to`Merge Lots" form has been filed with the Los Angeles County Recorder. A Notice of the outcome will be sent to you, and a copy will be filed with the Los Angeles County Recorder. If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Department at (213) 376-6984. Si rel Andrew rea • Associat Planner -2o- •.•....�w:,.......��.6:wi a.w). .e:.ac:sZC..i:ur:.r. .... . • . • • M1 C- LAW OFFICES OF LAUREL LEE ROBERTS, PH.D. ATTORNEY AT LAW ERIC RAFTER OF COUNSEL 239 PIER AVENUE/POST OFFICE BOX 594 HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90254 TELEPHONE: (213) 372-4480 14 January 1988 Mr. Andrew Perea, Asst. Planner Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach, Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Request for Hearing Dear Mr. Perea, This is to request a hearing before the Planning Commission on the merger of the Hermosa Beach lots owned by Mr. and Mrs. William Simas. Please schedule the hearing as far in the future as possible so as to give Mrs. Simas sufficient time to recover from a recent back injury before appearing before you. A two week notice of the proposed date would be very much appreciated. Several matters need comment at this time. First, your letter dated December 30, 1987, references the property at 1224 - 10th Street which is not owned by the Simas'. Second, stated in the same correspondence is the comment that the commission "intends to determine" if the Simas parcels shall be merged and that the relevant code section "allows" merger under certain circumstances. The choice of words is very significant here in that it implies an "open -mind" on the issue by the commission and the "option" of not taking action against the wishes of the Simas'. It is rather interesting, therefore, that the required notice given Mr. and Mrs. Simas was filed with the Los Angeles County Recorder; thus suggesting that a decision regarding the merger may have been made in advance of the hearing. Third, you refer to certain information available to the city which brings this issue before the commission. Please forward a copy of that information regarding his property directly to Mr. Simas. Thank you for your attention to this matter and for your assistance in resolving this situation. LLR:ms IAN 1J1988 l'N incerelyagaaiebli � Laurel Lee Roberts, Ph.D. Attorney at Law c c August 12, 1986 Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RE: Proposed Lot Merger Ordinance Dear Mayor and City Council: We are resident voters of the same Hermosa Beach address for over 21 years who bought our home at 1233 21st Street with the intent of eventually building for our retirement two single family residences on our property, Lots 57 & 58 Walter Ransom's Redondo Home Tract. The proposed change in code would cost us $75,000 - $100,000 of our investment. We are NOT DEVELOPERS." We are hard working people who are counting on this money for our retire- ment in full reliance with what city zoning permitted. This change in point of time would have little beneficial impact with the characteristics of the city, but would have a disastrous effect on us and other Hermosa Beach citizens in our similar situation. Recent ruling from the California Court of Appeal in the case of Orinda Association VS Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors noted that a zoning ordinance is in effect a contract between citizens and the city. We have acted in good faith; whatdoes the city propose to do? Sincerely, 4.¢.44;c240 -t., �.-0tec..J Mr. & Mrs. John H. Seymour 1233 21st Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 374-5375 cc: Planning Department Planning Commission City Manager February 8, 1988 Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Notice of Intention to Determine Whether Lots Shall Be Merged Dear Sirs: We are submitting this letter as a written request for a scheduled hearing before the Planning Commission regarding the above mentioned notice. Also, attached is a copy of our letter to the Mayor and City Council dated August 12, 1986, regarding the proposed Lot Merger Ordinance. If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Barbara Seymour at (213) 372-1171 Ext. 492 or at our hcme phone 374-5375. Sincerely, 6 Mr. & Mrs. John Seymour 1233 21st Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Notice is of Hermosa lots are Municipal ORDINANCE) CC, ® P Y of Document Recorded 'JAM 231933 NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE' �O EKES COUNTY REGISTRAR - RECORDER 138 -99221 ---- Has not been compared with original. Original will be returned when n' processing has been completed ' V hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City Beach intends to determine if .the following described eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4184004015 Property Owner: JOHN H SEYMOUR AND BARBARA M SEYMOUR 1233 21ST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Legal Description: LOTS 57 AND 58 REDONDO HOME TRACT A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. • CITY OF HERMOSA BEAQH BY Andrew Perea Associate P1 nner DATE January 15, 1988 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 15th day of January, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a votary public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew Perea, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa•Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. YAW Aie'd .K C ;i OFFICIA'. SEAL Kathleen L Reviczky NU1AR, 0U 8LIG ,:AU.Oda.• LOS ANGELES COON n My Commission Expires Sept. 16. 1988 1 1 1 1 EAL (FREE RECORDING IS REQUEST PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS). C WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 JAN 13198+ l'' COPY of Cccui ent Recorded -88-- 466.3(.._._. Has.nct been ccmpred with original. Awl. nviginal will be returned when I f processing has been completed. .LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR - RECORDER NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 -(LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4161028006 Property Owner: Legal Description: WILLIAM SIMAS & MARGERT SIMAS 1214 10TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 LOT 43, LOT 44, AND LOT 45 BLOCK 144 REDONDO VILLA TRACT A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY An P rea Associat Planner DATE December 29, 1987 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 29th day of December, 1987, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew Perea, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. JAI pC$A SEAL X ~' Kathleen L. Reviczky WITNESS my band and official seal. h7.c4 . NIII NN• vI IBCA:. CALIFORNIA • 'f LOS ANGELES COUNTY *Ze-A.,9 My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 1988 SEAL (FREE RECORDING IS REQUED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) -zs- 4, 24TH .ST Oi • 2 1 ST 14' t. WALTE R A -room co.'s ReDoNbo 4OfrlE TR Rc.r q-.5-1 ST. cr, • IOTH. 25 18" 25 25 0 46 1.) .0 . 1,9 20 to 1• t 21 04 T• 2 • 42 23 0 41 25 24 25 00 40 25 BL K. If44 .n .n ' G 25 s N 0 39 25 /2 26 25 of 38 17 27 L 0 37 2'8 36 29 44 t 0 35 /_5 30 sT. BELMONT LN. .. 34 /6 31 25 0 33(7-, o 0 32 25 z J N 80°45'1":" 0 g TH. 0 S T. • REDONDO V1LL M. s. 10- A TRA CT 90-91 20 c r {-( x-11 IQ 1 pck3e- ' 11'=501 •rid,.. •F . 1!• • t • 1i • - r 41‘.11°".t CjJM V1.7:4 1 •Vf y • IN • ^Y z• n• sa' •'ire • 0.0- ( C Easy- Reader Run Date: April 14, 1988 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 • • PUBLIC NOTICE • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on April 26, 1988 following: to consider the 1. Zone change of area 2.from R-2 to R-1.* • .- 2. Appeal of Planning Commission unmerging of lots located 1214 10th Street and 1233 21st Street. 3. Text amendment to Zoning Ordinance & Environmental • Negative Declaration regarding projections into required yard areas. *Map on file in Planning Department in City Hall. • SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at •8:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 1315 Valley•Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time and place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning and Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to Thursday, April 21, 1988 at 12:00 noon . IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984,. Ext. 242. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH THE PROCEDURE FOR ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS LOTS. WHEREAS, the City Council held ajeting on May 10, 1988 and setfortb tbe following procedure for lot line adjustments: A. The Planning Department shall accept applications for lot line adjustments; B. Applicant shall submit a completed application and Certificate of Compliance form; C. A fee of $320.00 shall be included with the application unless by minute -order of the City Council the fees are waived; D. The Planning Department shall submit for hearing before the Planning Commission and/or City Council applications for approval; 1. Where the Planning Commission and/or City Council determine that there is significant public concern, a public bearing may be required and the applicant shall be required to accomplish tbe public noticing; E. An approved lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the Los Angeles County Recorder to be recorded with the deeds of all affected lots. No lot line adjustment shall become effective until such recordation has occurred and the City bas received acknowledgement of said recordation from the Los Angeles County Recorder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby setfortb the ab e procedures for changing the boundaries between con lots. Xt 1 ��� May 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1988 SUBJECT: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURE INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached lot line adjustment procedure, and further recommends the City Council provide a Minutes -order to waive lot line adjustment fees when in conjunction with lot mergers. Background The current lot line adjustment procedure is departmental in nature, and staff believes it should be officially adopted by the City Council if it is to be utilized in conjunction with the merging of lots. Analysis The attached resolution will provide an official method to allow existing lots to have boundary adjustments. Further, it will allow the City Council to waive fees in certain instances such as in conjuction with lot mergers. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully Mich el chubach Planning Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH THE PROCEDURE FOR ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS LOTS. WHEREAS, the City Council held a hearing on May 10, 1988 and setforth the following procedure for lot line adjustments: A. The Planning Department shall accept applications for lot line adjustments; B. Applicant shall submit a completed application and Certificate of Compliance form; C. A fee of $320.00 shall be included with the application unless by minute -order of the City Council the fees are waived; D. The Planning Department shall submit for hearing before the Planning Commission and/or City Council applications for approval; 1. Where the Planning Commission and/or City Council determine that there is significant public concern, a public hearing may be required and the applicant shall be required to accomplish the public noticing; E. An approved lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the Los Angeles County Recorder to be recorded with the deeds of all affected lots. No lot line adjustment shall become effective until such recordation has occurred and the City has received acknowledgement of said recordation from the Los Angeles County Recorder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby setforth the above procedures for changing the boundaries between contiguous lots. 1 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONTINUED -- Resolution No. 88 - PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY - 2 a.. TRACT NO. 44937 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 6, TRACT RECORDED IN BOOK 14, PAGE 61, OF MAPS BLOCK 85, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA IN BOOK 3, PAGES 11 AND 12 OF MAPS, BOTH RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. SHEET 1 OF3SHEETS NO. 2 94, AS PER MAP AND A PORTION OF LOT 9, BEACH, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COMPASS ENG/NEER/NG CO. INC. ~A/e2 7-e- frV Th�•T WE DF OrP fIiN ThE Lf/�/lx /A/;; i'V/7?7'A/ 7/".7/./1.7/.frt,/t./ oma/ Tis'/S MAS J4,7747//4/ Ti1E O/ST/�cT/vF BOiPOE.P L/�t/�5,, �.�/o `1/E GO,(/SEit/T TO Th'E f'.PEPfJ.P.9f/A/o OF 5i9/V /1-09P /tit/ S�Bo/tom/S/oi[/. Ff/B/ANO C/CCON Fila/ANa co/P�,PA FAB/A�/o coR�o�,.gTioit/ A G�9C/.�OT.t//A 7?3</ Air/, B/lyOUN Go/e/.7-7,a/t/, i7CAG/FoRN//! GO P:0/1,477.0'/V. /diPEr76Eit/T /Oi(/ STATE o� c�� /Fo�iviA oz/./v7"/ aF Gos �i��FCEs.S�ss Orr/ Ty/S fir^' OAS' OFFEBRt/,4.P�, /98,5, B��piPE �✓IE/C79)iYloic/!P e/. �vES/T� �9 it/OTi�i�y PUBG /C /V,1,'Vi STATE �E�SO�AGGY %��f �i9iPE� Ff�B/f�i!/O C/G'Cpil/� �EC'!il/f�GGy XA~t, A / 7;yE Bf�5i5 O� Si�Ts�i�TOTJ� EiiioE�v�E Tv BE /‘FiY.sov ��s'o j--g/77,4r/ //1/1.7-A-A/7--/77/-CGIPF�iP.v7�av 7r77 ThEAV/r/1//4///7;f7//11/7-41ev/c/t/Aoyvie- r.W7Z0I /E,r'ECd7"O Ti'E iYrTi//.t/ /rY6T�Pl.B+�F�T Paecreow7 /D7r.1 By-LAl1/i OiP /1 �ESoLt/T/oir/ pfjT�6Ofl�PO DF O/.PEc'To�s yEN/A Bf1�ro(/�/ �RE�oE�v7- 5A)'A/ co,��n,Pi9Tiov Aso'%/'10Nd A/OTfIiPy NATE DF CfIL/�O�Pit//,4 Z GO�/ri/Tl'OF Gni �S ON 77V/ 1-'',45ierafAiery � /9B5 , BE�•PE NJE T/1E /1/oEAP,/s/�p A NOTi9.�Y PU6uc iv �.uv ,=a/c='SA/O STATE, fE�P.SO�c%9GGy /54 jo/IAyOW PE�PSON`/LG y ,&-'ii/O/?/N To N/E 7?' ME oiv Th'E B�SiS O� r�-s�TiS�,gcToRY E✓i�E�vcE To B� 777�r frV/y 72E' 27Y& 4/T/>/�t/ /NyT,VEA /15 Tiff �ic/T GF Tf/E GoiP�oiP.4T/O�/ ThipT EXECUTED T/�E /4U/T/774/ �.rPUi✓frt/T,49A/o A44fr' 7± Ta M� T/�f1T ✓�,/� Co�P�o�P�OTiON ,EXEC�/TEO Ti�/E ,72 7/7"/ //t/ST/ere, �!/,Pjll/�jt/r 7", /TS By Z/4/4/. oAP A "PESoGuT/oma/ a� iTs �44q O� p/�PEcTo�S N 7�,�y,��B�ic ..; L DENNIS PI E UC CAUFOR t,.9,E.ESCOUNTY nv Exp. Jany 11, 77 -7/n - / %E w�TE,� G'o���,c�y E9S�ir�E�vr �oG ft t"/��"G/ic/ES 4A, /2: /t/G//�"E/j l //1/ 80oK /l /7 /��l�E 17 GOy ,f/t/IIESGDl.�ic/T/v QA 7/ TTE� //rc//P CEJ 343' O� Ti1� S�/6�////7O/�/ //71/e; f�T,� s�.ucE ay.4rEAsvv cy..m*Eo GOrI/p/TION GHQ O/S!/SE O.YL.9C�/e"5, S.q/O /NTEiPEST A,-E,9�S TO 41r4 NO DA"- A4 c7-/C,qS USS- '4' li�gGU�'" .q/t/O SA9/p S/ 7 /S /41i�OSS/f3G 6- D/F /�11 fi'/9C7�/C.9G 7�O r '6' 7 9//t/ S,9/ Ate' �l � '� �5 /A/ . � d �"' � �iY7r" /N,O�'"T���!//{/.9TH'' ENI/�/EFK.� GEPT/F/G//TE- / /7/ -/to" --.0/ Z17 / ilM ,�ETF�P�v v/G 7717 .74- OF CAL/F,rA 771 // 77'5 F/t// Z MA/�o/SisT/Ny oF3 9�'EErs, 47 Z /4tio COe%GET.E Si/.�YEy /9fS ',yofrvy �o At/rs M,vv� esu o� �tivE�r�r� o,<w-rlo v /,V �EcEi�IB�PTif�l ThE ThF 1%4/ AA ATi4/ `ft/ /��,�Fo�c/ /ti /Lf�CE�' T/i 9T .�f//O N/UiC7E�r/TS 02MG/Eistz " PET�P/�CEo f4/A4 1»'fl',V P�9 TAH y.SN / Ce-4/77/eZzA/ti sI5 N/3� Z9 i/t/ 91B C/A//4/,1l NoTE: Tip/S Z?,41C7 /5 /45 /4 141/TCD•r/�v,/n//Ur "jr04/ 14,///,-,e5FP)-' z/////T5 DF f//f'" J4/ AA/ /4/?'I'' /,1L/77 /4/ /?//,,„'h' /N 72'Av ��POv/�� TfrE N,E�Fss�y,�y f>'ccEss f/NO UZ/77- 42 7A'7" Tr5E !/il//TS f�EREBI� GE.PT/Fy Th/ " .0,i+l/!/EO 77ijS Air -17:" iA/o z41r /7-'',/tz.;ritS T/f1L 7217ln- 7-""-/t/Z-4.T/dam /11,1AAN� %GG /J/,'1'27 .9'Z 177. Ei�Eo�' 77'z417 fIGL y�Od/S/O�c/SOf Z,9Z�r�/Bp/�/iS/O�✓ Dr��/i1/f�if/CFS OF T/7v q44,4 /.4.,6frz E f/T Tf1� T/N1E of A��iPp!//�L O� Tf�E 7A/7Z"/F /�.Aflfe,/v/o.2 /7;-7;•Atio 7;9.4' T /,,9,Af Z4'7 Tris r01ie9 J4'7V �PESP�cT 7? r/Ty �ECO�os A. 7IDEMA4Cr''''. [ N ,;fid J T7'- 2.. -- 2.14- - 28• 5/ 1 --)1/ L'$ ,t, At .t C/TY 'j 77A/c,4 7;; / ffE,PEBy CE,PT/�Y Tis/9T T/�E C/TY c'O�/ticiG Ori 7,7 O� f�E�PMG.�i9 B�/�•fi', y�1oTioy fjVO�T�� f�T /TS SEES/Oit/ oit/ Tri'E Di9Y OF , /94r � i9�i�POI/Eo Tfi'E At/t/A,' C/TY CGE/t.0 pF 77I7� C/7y O� hE.PivlOsi� 6L�Acf1 y7' T�PFi9SU�PE�P�S CE,e 77:>17' //f4y' 7-174,47->IZZ fi�FSSNiEivTS GE�/i�t� d�vvE,P 7?/E" TlOir/OfCiTy OF h,Or./i-/ TO J4'/½// z�' /,t/ TffE ly/Tis'//l/ t.S/Oit/ AiVy rr9rr7- M.9/;0' %t/�l�L�, h�✓E BEFit/ �/V /it/ Gi7r T,c�F%s�.PE� o� THS ciTi� o� NE�.�vs� „0".0G',7/ 6/TV P2,-//vA/;,?.�' / 1/eXreerr 6ag?2qA,7q4 Ty � 774T7VfM� � SOY BY r/te- �L/INN/.</!j o,9/ OF v.eve;siBES /96G• /it/ N.9TUfrE> Se`c,PFA�' ori /4vAiv.Vhvy COMM/S/Oit/ Dry 779e -- TRACT NO. 44937 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA O/Yi�,/�PS GE,�TjF/C�TE pV hE�PEBy GE.PT/Fy Z'47 !yE �,PE 777/- DF OT frirE /,V,747EO /,v 7--/7/ G9•t/G15 /.ti�'Gt/oEo W/TH/N iezeo/i//S/O.+/ /,kV,iV Off/ 7"/". �if/1 frW7?y7,t/ 77y BpiPpE�P L/it/ES, ANO fr*Ve CO�/SE.t/T TO Tiff /4°,4ePPfiiP�9T/O�t/ F/G //VI pF 5A/4e' yJAf �N� /71/4/4/7/7•42/ePA/E ,1/-/i//t/!S fiNp LO/9N i9SSAC/9T/Oit/ i9 Cf1L/Fi�JiP�t//moi CdTii• 7T/t/, BENEF�C/9iPy L61/OEiP A DEEB OF 77f«T �EG'G�POE� pa•"1,4140,-/P //, /9B7 �6 /ySTPUti1E.vT Ivo. 017-/9O0.0/76'. 70gal...a -44.) qp,qv5vr 9Z'' er��0s, �TfITE or'= CAG /.-./Piv/A Caur/Tj/ of GO.� .9N1/EGESj�ss p/te/ 7-/v/OP 9"'vAy , /79B, ME 7"-/7/- U�/oE.rSNEt7 f! NOT�i-)� PUG /N AND Fo�C ,!A/D �E�so.e//9�Gy AP�Ef,'iPE� ✓6;t/ONO. f/FPBST , .k--/+iovri.*/ TO ME OSP 7[0,- .+�E oiv THE B�siS o� .�ATi4FAcTo�y �'+i�oF�cE To �3� THE ���Psov W/!O 7;y /40 724.7E �it/T 4A /ti -/t' gt�/l�lS /E,f:0;04/i9GGy X'A,'4'A/ /.0:Pory To ov egss v/4 E•daE TvBE T/s'E f���soit e/T�o THE pv/774fi,V //v.077rez/tt,/7-- f!S T//E wc,f- ,4PPA/471/7"- pF TyE c•AP�iP.4Ti,t/ Tisi�YT EXEG'l/TEO 7-/eE �'C,CNO`t/GEdl�EO Tv �v1E 7";w•-z,c,4/ Co�Poo�Pi9Tio�c/ EXECt/TE�Tis'El�r�/TiY/i✓ /N.4TiP�/�r lE�/TO�e+x/•9.t/T 7'4"7 /7"✓6y-GAir�S OSP � �EsoG �Tiv�v of irs dOi1�� OF O.Gt E�TO�PS AS BENEF/Ci.9.Py i1/OTA y /U6G/G Y NNIS f Y Pam - CALIFORNIA l.0S ANGELES CC LINTY Comm. bp _Jan. 11, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS SCALE: I 'I= 30' k.%4 \kA 4t© ' TRACT NO. 44937 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7"°8 c �cc�TE� AS TSE i✓Gy 4/ ti /X7N 299.9 ' D G NOT ,4 L Y # `/A/g- o'er G vT 9, BG oe'.- `L? 29: . T�4 5/ , 2' '97�.av 7-/g9 -iv 2y L/'Ve A/029i�B,/�6/ .FT Z /,?' `y T SCEG10.0z7, Fevow) of 77'rs EKY </rt/E OF GOT y TGT i✓O. MB. -G/ E5T�6. ory �.Qv�s�Tiov oE,Csf�io TSP NO Z94 SU80/(i/S/O.t/ /.59.y3' N7�i vim¢%6 "E /99, yo N71v"5:0%l "-' `O, �,C; A/fI/G /rte L /EL/ Off' G e`TilG.f���77<,. ii/D 5ggz/ 407 9`,--. • X39 9z' � • �� 899' 4 ki Ott'tintit\ ��\to�ti t‘ IkN'tcitiv\k .‘\‘0,f,. ;Ik111\1.%1 \iiN %,11\\ i\J)ioN k /4.../3:1,9 _1/‘-'7- ,^ kI\ Z\1 h 5988 gggg Ogee SET L 1Ti1y' SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS FOL ,9G,f'�E,P 2447A%? 3QJl-lv, AAA' 949 .1Tit'EET ti A4\ t\,\ tk1kt,, \V: kO\' NOT /74A'7"- F2/ iI.'T .399/ ' //9, /30.00' /it/L/EU ;01T PreiC 5g9�G ,til.B 716' t&lc „1/4 58&,. M.0; 90B -.5isz r9.c/o vv G)' 45 -/NE �y�.ys SDG ��-PEG ''*°"11.441! W � /Pg/t, 4 7 ,se -,T;05,, -t-1 \I /";e7 7;r: SUMO/ L"//',&/ ,�v v 7X'gffr 540'a ed9gite /0.,a/ 59`9, /7G'". /NO/CAT 7/'/E B !/rt/pif,42'y 4.4Are7' SUBS/40 ex. r'� /ND/C/JTES ,SECoiup f/pp/T/Oit/ 707 f7'E.eiWa0;41 BEi/, MB. 3-//-/Z ,A`„ .41 fi-Ar Zfr,41, ,erG.' "'ZOO, /1/0,41 ,7,C774fsr.47.r ' �IiC,ifLG� / -#A94890:6? � • • ♦ • • t 401/4 -t- 7r IN j a). 41,/ fte. ,6*/ 40,1 4 -4t4 AL53rk VW 1-14 101.47 fel )0 CI /04.11., • Tw 1t °••••••••••• - 3411 410..) '01.34 Fcs- fe.04 A0,0545 ‘'.1,-/ w.�u CAr toz,r Er iD-1.2.5' 5-4) 1.2 5w, 0!, c • w4 s 14,g50„,1: ••••••- .•••••••••••,A. ..w.•••••w•i••,A. .> f:& v 25. t` r C. '- L' P 4171,frnot„ 1 INC toy - '4.414 stc)::)r.. r- 11.1:1; Ftotafftl ./ et4tm a ate: 4071t. levAier- 6 /di trY, St A 14. .1. 31. H XV: -rifri..2.• w 44C- Assomet, • • ♦ y 1988 Inli 11.11W° :"E"Ca 0.1 s- 0 4.32 Ins �4.3 L 0. 4( ifi 0 0 Et 4 z v IX (213) 874-0520 up 0 JTy CC 0 W Z c 0 w 1- 0 c L z cn pie.vo.per /- 47 ivold iPere-46,460, /do," ‘40-/..wdde /1,:v Air for° 4•4', foe-00,ice. 444 Cof-4ra 't.-4441to ix)/(11 2Ce, 5T'm :4Ym ,ize -ra's m41 iZsmAr.. (T)--zle:' A col-ek x 1 -13 4-1c WP . 6P x .e-,' 0: X 4,1-64- X 1 IV ' C‘ •3°74-''' / - a " X a • 5 ,K 1 el pc. .54..ipiNc, wiz qi-0 )(6:1614 x i'li5 r4 K6, x 4'' i , -4- , v 1 - 2.!* -4,44 eaLIP11.14 WM. )( 6,'-eAsi — rzeu5S S.VniST mittremzei:, v.etZ c4' c 1.-6-17-....:;:5 rciri% )(a -1r .....-• AIIIIIII• • cr 2 0 • ex.s'--59)( ‹c p.-2 j r.0"..-"r•r4r.rrr:•:4.,4*.r TY P wi KJ Pow ‹.-3,64-4 e.pu 1.-.5.— . 5T'm 4 -ri-Pe t.‘4A-r* rtemAocide, r vz._° x ..c) ‘L:tcfc.e. ALum xo 6P x .e-,' 0: C‘ •3°74-''' i r4 K6, x 4'' i , -4- , v ,, ....1...c ceLocwm ex tep-rt r-tcl .i sew - c 1.-6-17-....:;:5 rciri% ____ oc- • • 444* 41)11- 3 3 c)" Kr- ----r 0 Wit-IPPW LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA FC u N t/g4P \*3 Ti Tui 4cay; <Wes/ e - w Ptit. t.)o,4f si4) (%1 3i At V:41:re'2- jij 8033 SUNSET BLVD r" • • te;P 1756 7:4-* f:3t4 cAr-ota gf2tsk, /Cvvzi'vy) 1.41g‘ti • reitz" -7140 TO c4, CO t-..1 1- i L 4)Sto coisir fT /3,-yofri/Y- 0 ' V 10., ..sL-..-.7:---.-7.......,...„,.......„ ...., ..r.,... ,,,...,,.. _ ... , ' 4 ;..............--4 6 T2.2:4' \Ai • • KsrLi /.6. 4•' itt„,14 15:itorfrr \C-e)ft C -L41 umeu5. tzt" -.-Mi 4X.G. 15,11.4.40/fr" \A) 27( /4 7fosr 70/.5,- /9. SE•la *V' ,..1ber tee) • SAIS-r4 puc-R • 1 - - 4X44'2 roC71)4r ,my- /2.1 - Ce6 1.044",04)7,,;(005- ,reksrCi) RUC 4- 0 (-rlo (Ahnte Az.4 tde, AM446 9?iivi•cp iv 3e 4 sni•OS ---- M47 1-1 .4)40 .C.01 -34T. PC<I" • ri-WePAOYF-r q..t 7( ° Zetii‹..&"Te MsYrriST P • .le-,,-ftwe..4wiu 10 13E. tkAuoicEP OA • 4lo4kr4 wpa4.-5, sS• 114,1/14%1) tAsysi VAL-y5. . . • • • art of', le6-Mo p41r• OF 401414 /it). 4-x to f 4)(0 .;;;T•1;4< -2s7 Y4s-r1r-4c.1 6:0° 1 WI OW5 tA6-1 4x4- c-oNT, por • ArWily 10 t-4. -teva` 4221 TION' • LvvakL vtfit PL. • F Losiok:M 1/42i 1-_.11-211 61'74 4,1e. •rt-tr AeC44 MAY 0 '2, 198S 1:0 • ;4,--4 • •r. •••• 4•.`, ,,°:s4i,:•.,.e,,.,• 34.,L•z.rtts-s. New Acorn ow 0 O ti co C) N • tD O O z cr 0 LL —J 0 L - `/A-1 8033 SUNSET BLVD 0114 A.cfAne.Ns a N� -. 5 :T. c-c:.tJ k "1 'rte -EC , 2. 3'/x+4coU, t3, C xi 1-#.-z z "a