Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/09/00)1'X-Se) -M 604 )//4-14'.6L.9( -TFVV rY iy- .tw.A "Children are the anchors that hold a mother to life." - Sophocles Remember, Mother's Day is May 14th! AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2000 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR J. R. Reviczky MAYOR PRO TEM John Bowler COUNCIL MEMBERS Kathy Dunbabin Sam Y. Edgerton Julie Oakes CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF APRIL 25, 2000: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. 1 • (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendarmay do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from John Hanley of Our Lady of Guadalupe Church requesting a reduction in the hourly security rate to pay for the officers working non- profit organization events. RECOMMENDATION: Consider request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on April 11, 2000; and; 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on April 25, 2000. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March 2000 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving and adopting the Administering Agency - State Master Agreement No. 000155 and Program Supplement Agreement No. 0350 Rev. 000 for Project RPL -5155 (003) Pavement Rehabilitation of Ardmore Avenue between rt Street and 2"d Street and between 25th Street and Ardmore Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 2, 2000. (f) Recommendation to approve the appropriation of $2,346 interest earned on Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds received for Project No. CIP 99-144, Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Walkway between 24th Street and 35th Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 2, 2000. (g) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of April 4, 2000. (h) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District Specified Project Grant Program for the reconstruction of the strand bikeway and pedestrian walkway between 24th Street and 35th Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 2, 2000. (i) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the application for grant funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District Per Parcel Discretionary Grant Program for the Municipal Pier Renovation. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 2, 2000. (j) Recommendation to receive and file Integrated Pest Management Program report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 24, 2000. 3 • 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 00-1198 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FIRST PLACE AND ARDMORE AVENUE AT 603 FIRST PLACE AND 112-142 ARDMORE AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 106 THROUGH 110 INCLUSIVE, WALTER RANSOM CO' S VENABLE PLACE." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 27, 2000. b. ORDINANCE NO. 00-1199 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE TWO-STORY MAXIMUM IN THE R-1, R -1A, R-2 AND R -2B ZONES, TO ELIMINATE DEFINITIONS OF STORY AND BASEMENT, AND TO CODIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING, MEASURING AND ENFORCING BUILDING HEIGHT." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 27, 2000. c. ORDINANCE NO. 00-1200 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 8.04 OF TITLE 8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.04 THERETO, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 8 (PUBLIC HEALTH LICENSING) AND DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 11 (HEALTH CODE) OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND PENALTIES." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 27, 2000. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE REQUIRED PARKING, INCLUDING GUEST SPACE, TO BE IN TANDEM AT 1250 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 12.5' OF LOT 44 AND ALL OF LOT 45, BLOCK 140, REDONDO VILLA TRACT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 3, 2000 (Continued from meeting of April 11, 2000) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's denial of the requested variance. 5. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT P.C. RESOLUTION 98-57 AND C.C. RESOLUTION 98-5939, PERMITTING ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND SPECIFIED HOURS OF OPERATION FOR IBIZA RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 934 HERMOSA AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 1, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's decision to modify the Conditional Use Permit with additional Conditions of Approval. 6. COMPLETION OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT. INCLUDES AMENDING THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN, AND A TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADOPT REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES OF THE LAND USE PLAN AND COASTAL ACT. WILL RESULT IN THE CITY OBTAINING PERMIT AUTHORITY FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 4, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution amending the City's Certified Coastal Land Use Plan; introduce ordinance amending the City's Zoning Ordinance to implement the Local Coastal Program; and, adopt resolution authorizing submittal of a Local Coastal Program to the Coastal Commission. 5 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. PROJECT NO. CIP 99-144, RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 2, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Approve plans, specifications, estimates, order the work and call for bids, and instruct the City Clerk to post a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said project. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER NONE 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 10. • OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on April 25, 2000. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association Hermosa Beach Police Management Association ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT Hermosa Beach City Counsel 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Counsel Members: Ouii Lay 'or GuuaaLupe Cburzoh 320 Massey Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Office: (310).372-7077 April 18, 2000 APR 10 2000 mA7'JAc:1i .3c, 7'iV My name is John Hanley and I represent Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church. As you may be aware, OLG will be having its annual festival on the following dates. May 19, 2000 May 20, 2000 May 21, 2000 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 12:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. We understand that it is within the Counsel's discretion to lower the hourly security rate to pay for the officers working non-profit organization events. We are humbly requesting that the City waive its customary security charge of $65.00 per hour, per Police Officer for this event and instead charge the Officer's actual hourly rate. Please feel free to contact me personally at 310-824-5555 ext. 212 regarding this request or alternatively, please contact OLG directly. We are, of course, very interested in receiving feedback concerning our request. I appreciate you taking this matter into consideration. Sincerely, /h-5/ John V. Hanley 131 •• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 11, 2000, at the hour of 7:20 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Nancy Reviczky ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Dunbabin, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes Absent: None OUTGOING MAYOR'S COMMENTS: Mayor Oakes said she had been fortunate during her term as Mayor to represent the City, along with Mayor Pro Tempore JR Reviczky and City Clerk Elaine Doerfling, in Loreto during the Sister City adult trip in December, 1999. She said it was a pleasure representing the community and that she was constantly amazed and proud 'of the number of citizens who volunteer to do so much in the community. She said she also had the pleasure of officiating at bringing in the new millennium during her term as Mayor. She thanked everyone for the opportunity to. serve. APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 4, 2000. A. Designate Mayor for a term ending January 23, 2001. Action: To designate J.R. Reviczky as Mayor for a term ending January 23, 2001. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton: The motion carriedby a unanimous vote. B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending January 23, 2001. Action: To designate John Bowler as Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending January 23, 2001. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. C. Presentation of Plaque Appointed Mayor. Outgoing Mayor by Newly Mayor Reviczky presented a plaque of appreciation to outgoing Mayor Oakes, thanking her for all of her hard work and commending her for her excellent service. INCOMING MAYOR'S COMMENTS: Mayor Reviczky thanked the Council for appointing him as Mayor and spoke of the many great challenges and opportunities over the six years he has been in office and the progress that had been made. He said this would be an exciting year for the City, with the re -opening this summer of the Pier, the completion of the north Strand project, and the re -paving of Pacific Coast Highway, along with a number of residential streets, noting that he would also be able to preside as Mayor over the real millennium City Council Minutes 04-11-00 Page 10223 1a0 • • celebration in 2001. He thanked his wife Nancy for her patience and understanding and thanked the citizens of the community for placing their trust in him. At 7:30 P.M., the order of the agenda was suspended to move the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tempore and City Council committee assignments to the end of the meeting. The meeting recessed at 7:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 7:55 P.M. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Reviczky announced that the meeting would be adjourned in memory of Alice Ehlers, long-time lawn - bowling advocate, noting that she had been responsible for the sport's come -back. He said she would be missed by her peers in lawn -bowling and the community. Mayor Reviczky announced that Sharon Wickwire., the City's recreation specialist, in charge of the skateboard track, won an award from the California Parks and Recreation Society. He said she does a wonderful job with the youth at the skateboard track and was very deserving of this award. Mayor Reviczky then announced a Household Hazardous Waste Roundup to be held Saturday April 29, 2000, starting at 9 A.M., in parking lot E at the Xerox Corporation in El Segundo. Councilmember Edgerton reported on Thursday's Citizens Airport Advisory Committee meeting, which was .also attended by Mayor Reviczky and Councilmember Dunbabin. He said the presentation was very good and the meeting was well attended. He said the next meeting would take place Wednesday, April 12, 2000 at 7 p.m. and invited interested parties to attend. Councilmember Dunbabin said she would be unable to attend the April- 27, 2000 Council of Governments meeting, noting that Mayor Reviczky was the alternate. She also thanked Roger Bacon for his fundraising efforts and the committee for its labor in the restoration of the windmill. CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF MARCH 28, 2000: reportable actions. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Hugo Ugolini - Il Boccaccio. Restaurant at 39 Pier Avenue, said he wished to enclose an existing deck for office space but was told by staff that he would be responsible for three parking spaces. City Manager Burrell responded to questions. City Council Minutes 04-11-00 Page 10224 Action: To refer the matter to staff with direction to research the issue and report back to Council. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Mayor Mike Gordon, City of 'El Segundo, requesting City Council consideration of a resolution in support of El Segundo's complaint against Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) for violations of CEQA. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 00-6052, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF EL SEGUNDO'S COMPLAINT AGAINST LAWA FOR VIOLATIONS OF CEQA," as requested by El Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon. Motion Bowler, second Dunbabin. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. Letter from Jim Lissner requesting the addition of a tally of "Drunk in Public" arrests to the Police Department monthly activity reports. Action: To receive and file. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (j), with the exception of the following item which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (e) Oakes. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on March 14, 2000; and 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on March 28, 2000. Action: To approve as presented the minutes of the Regular Meetings of March 14, 2000 and March 28, 2000. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER 'NOS. 20777 THROUGH 20894, AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 20829, 20613, 20643, 17065, AND 17035 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register aspresented. City Council Minutes 04-11-00 Page 10225 (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE FEBRUARY 2000 FINANCIAL REPORTS: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and 3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the February 2000 Financial Reports. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATIONS OF $8000 FROM CHEVRON TO BE USED FOR SUMMER 2000 SURF CAMP AND $380 FROM SKATE PARK RAFFLES TO BE USED FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF WORN SKATE PARK PROGRAM EQUIPMENT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 3, 2000. Supplemental memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 10, 2000. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Oakes for discussion later in the meeting in order to publicly acknowledge and thank the donors. Action: To accept the donations of $8,000 from Chevron to be used for the Summer 2000 Surf Camp and $380 from Skate Park Raffles to be used for the replacement of worn Skate Park program equipment. Motion Oakes, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SOUTH BAY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS PROGRAM TO PROVIDE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ADJACENT SOUTH BAY CITES AND APPROPRIATE $17,815 AS THE CITY'S DISCOUNTED PROGRAM COST. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 30, 2000. (g) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the request to participate in the South Bay Council of Governments program to provide aerial photography services (orthophotography) for the City of Hermosa Beach and adjacent South Bay cities; and 2) Appropriate $17,815 as the City's discounted program cost. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING` FINAL MAP #25258 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 634 AND 636 LONGFELLOW AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 3, 2000. City Council Minutes 04-11-00 Page 10226 J Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 00-6053, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25258 FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 634 AND 636 LONGFELLOW AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (h). RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #25320 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1619 AND 1625 PROSPECT AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 3, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 00-6054, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25320'FOR A TWO - UNIT. CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1619 AND 1625 PROSPECT AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE USE OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER LAWN BY THE KIWANIS CLUB TO OPERATE'A HOLIDAY TREE LOT OR THE 2000 SEASON. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 30, 2000. Action: To approve the.use of the Community Center lawn by the Kiwanis Club to operate a holiday tree lot for the 2000 season, as recommended staff. (j) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $35,412 FROM FEDERAL -AID SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM -LOCAL (STP -L) FUNDS AND $4,588 FROM CIP FUND 301 FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 00-139 STREET IMPROVEMENTS, HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN 16TH STREET AND 26TH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY CITY LIMITS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 3, 2000. Action: To appropriate $35,412 from Federal -Aid Surface Transportation Program -Local (STP -L) Funds and $4,588 from CIP Fund for Project No. CIP 00-139 Street Improvements, as recommended by staff. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Item 1(e) was heard at this time but is shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS City Council Minutes 04-11-00 Page 10227 a • 4. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE REQUIRED PARKING_, INCLUDING GUEST SPACE, TO BE IN TANDEM AT 1250 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 12.5' OF LOT 44 AND ALL OF LOT 45, BLOCK 140, REDONDO VILLA TRACT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 6, 2000. Noting that this item would be continued to the meeting of May 9, 2000, Mayor Reviczky opened the public hearing for comments from any members of the public who wished to speak this evening. No one came forward to address the Council. Action: To continue the public hearing to May 9, 2000, as recommended by staff. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. MUNICIPAL MATTERS None 5. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. REQUEST FROM WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING PROJECT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 2000. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To authorize a letter of support to expand the West Basin Water Recycling Program to include other South Bay areas, as recommended by staff. Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. .The motion carried by a unanimous vote. b. AB1835 (BAUGH): GRANTS TO PUBLIC AGENCIES TO PAY UP TO 50% OF DIVERTING DRY WEATHER FLOWS TO SEWER SYSTEM RATHER THAN BEACHES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 6, 2000. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize that a letter be sent to Assembly members Baugh and Nakano urging support for AB1835, which would authorize the State Water Resources Control Board to pay up to 50 percent of the cost of building systems to divert dry weather flows to the sewer system rather than the beaches. Motion Dunbabin, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None City Council Minutes 04-11-00 Page 10228 7. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a. Request from Councilman Edgerton to investigate the purchase/lease of airplane tracking system with other South Bay cities. Councilmember Edgerton spoke to his request. Action: To direct staff to other cities' on the purchase tracking system. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky unanimous vote. investigate and ,work with or lease of an airplane. . The motion carried by a At 8:17 P.M., the order of the agenda returned to the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tempore and City Council committee assignments. D. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Action: 1) To appoint Mayor Reviczky to the Los Angeles County - City Selection Committee; 2) to appoint Mayor Reviczky to the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board of Directors, and Mayor Pro Tempore Bowler as alternate director; and 3) to appoint Mayor Reviczky to the Inglewood Fire Training Authority, and Mayor Pro Tempore Bowler as alternate. Motion Oakes, second Dunbabin. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. E. Reorganization of remaining list of City Council Committee Assignments. Action: 1) To appoint Mayor Reviczky as delegate and Mayor Pro Tempore Bowler as alternate to the League of California Cities Board of Directors; 2) to appoint Councilmember Dunbabin to replace Mayor Reviczky .as a member of the Valley Park subcommittee; 3) to delete the Millennium Celebration subcommittee; and 4) to maintain the remaining assignments as presented. Motion Dunbabin, second Mayor Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, April 11, 2000, at the hour of 8:25 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, April 25, 2000, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. City Cler City Council. Minutes 04-11-00 Page 10229 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 25, 2000, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Hermosa Beach Cub Scout Troop #860 ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Dunbabin, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS: Councilmember Edgerton. said there would be. a South Bay Task Force meeting at 7 P.M. Monday, May 1, 2000, in the Rancho Palos Verdes Council Chambers to discuss over- flight issues. He asked the status of obtaining equipment to monitor and track aircraft coming from LAX across the beach cities. City Manager Burrell said the equipment would be available on loan for a demonstration and testing purposes next week. Councilmember Dunbabin spoke of the success of this year's Spring Eggstravaganza, which took place Saturday, April 22, 2000, and commended the Community Resources staff for putting on such a great event. Councilmember Oakes concurred, noting that she attends every year with her husband and daughter. PROCLAMATIONS: VETERAN APPRECIATION MONTH MAY 2000 Mayor Reviczky read the proclamation, which had been requested by the State of California, and proclaimed May 2000 as Veteran Appreciation Month in Hermosa Beach. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Mike Cassidy - chair of the Citizen's Advisory Committee pertaining to FAA and LAX issues, submitted a memorandum from the committee and read aloud the preliminary recommendations contained therein for Council consideration; said the Committee was actively seeking qualified volunteers to help do research. Action: To agendize the recommendations of the Citizens Airport Advisory Committee for consideration by the Council at its next regular meeting of May 9, 2000. Motion Edgerton, second. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Mayor Reviczky noted that the Citizens Airport Advisory Committee meets in the Hermosa Beach City Council Chambers every Wednesday at 7 P.M. City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10230 1ac • • Continuing to come forward to address the Council was: Michael Keegan - submitted flyers -and announced an LAX debate and luncheon hosted by the Manhattan Beach Chamber of Commerce legislative committee from 11:30 A.M. to 1 P.M. on Wednesday, May 3, 2000, at Soleil restaurant, 1142 Manhattan Avenue, Manhattan Beach; noting that El Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon would be a participant in the debate. City Manager Burrell said there was a need to add to the ,agenda as a municipal matter a proposed amendment to the existing ground lease for the building in front of the parking structure, noting that the issue arose after the posting of the agenda and required immediate action due to time constraints faced by the lessee. He submitted copies of the proposed amendment to the Council. Action: To add to the agenda as a municipal matter a proposed amendment to the ground lease between the City and 1303 Hermosa Avenue, LLC for the building in front of the parking structure based on the finding that the issue arose after the posting of the agenda and required immediate action due to time constraints of the lessee. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (s), noting the abstention of Councilmember Dunbabin on item (q), and with the exception of item (s), which was pulled by staff from the agenda to be brought back at a future meeting, and the following item which wasremoved for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (e) Mayor Reviczky. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON APRIL 11, 2000. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 20, 2000. Action: To receive and file the memorandum. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 20895 THROUGH 21040, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NOS. 20966, 20988, AND 20996, AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 20468, 20733, 20926 AND 20949 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10231 (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE MARCH 2000 FINANCIAL REPORTS. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 17, 2000. Action: To receive and file the memorandum regarding the March 2000 Financial Reports. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATIONS OF $1,000 TO BE USED FOR SKATE PARK STAFFING AND $250 TO BE USED FOR SPRING EGGSTRAVAGANZA EVENT ENTERTAINMENT RECEIVED FROM THE HERMOSA KIWANIS FOUNDATION. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April. 13, 2000. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Reviczky for discussion later in the meeting in order to publicly acknowledge and thank the donors. (f) Action: the City 1) 2) To accept the following donations received by from Kiwanis for the noted purposes: $1,000 - for Skate Park staffing. $ 250 - for Spring Eggstravaganza event entertainment. The motion carried Motion Mayor Reviczky, second Bowler. by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINIS from Personnel Director/Risk Manager April 12, 2000. CLAIM AND REFER IT TRATOR. Memorandum Michael Earl dated Claimant: Date of Loss: Date Filed: Sonia Cortez and Briana Ray 10/08/99 04/11/00 Action: To deny the above -noted claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator, as recommended by staff. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE RATE INCREASE OF $.05 PER SQUARE FOOT EACH YEAR FOR THE NEXT TWO FISCAL YEARS: FY 2000-2001 AT $1.08 PER SQUARE FOOT; AND FY 2001-2002 AT $1.13 PER SQUARE FOOT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 17, 2000: Action: To approve a Community Center lease rate increase of $.05 per square foot each year for the next two fiscal years as recommended by staff, thereby setting City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10232 • the FY 2000-2001 rate at $1.08 per square foot and the FY 2001-2002 rate at $1.13 per square foot. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FREE CONCERTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PIER FROM 4:OOPM TO 6:30PM, JUNE 9-10, AND 5:OOPM TO 7:OOPM, JUNE 11, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE IMG BEACH BASH. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 17, 2000. Supplemental information received April 20, 2000. Action: To approve the free concerts on the south side of the Pier from 4 P.M. to 6:30 P.M. June 9-10, and from 5 P.M. to 7 P.M. June 11, in conjunction with the IMG Beach Bash, as recommended by staff. (i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATES, ORDER THE WORK AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR CIP 95- 150, HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN PIER AVENUE AND 16TH STREET, AND INSTRUCT THE CITY CLERK TO POST A NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS FOR SAID PROJECT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 18, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the plans, specifications, and estimates, order the work and call for bids; and 2) Instruct the City Clerk to post a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said project. (j) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND DMR TEAM, INC. TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES TO INCLUDE CIP 00-139 HERMOSA/MANHATTAN AVENUE FROM 16TH STREET TO THE NORTHERLY CITY_ BOUNDARY; AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST AND THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT UPON APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO. MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SCOPE OF WORK AS NECESSARY, NOT TO EXCEED $39,300. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 17, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and DMR Team, Inc. to prepare plans, specifications and estimates to include Project No. CI.P 00-139 Hermosa/Manhattan Avenue from 16th Street to the northerly city boundary; Authorize the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to execute said amendment to the agreement, upon approval as to form by the City Attorney; and Authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to make adjustments to the scope of work as necessary, not to exceed $39,300. City Council Minutes 04-25.-00 Page 10233 • (k) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF A TOTAL OF SIX NEW VEHICLES, FOUR FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND TWO FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, TO WONDRIES FLEET DIVISION OF ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $155,325.76. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 19, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the purchase of a total of six new vehicles - four for the Public Works Department and two for the Community Development Department - to Wondries Fleet Division of Alhambra, California, in the amount of $155,325.76; and 2) Authorize staff to issue the appropriate purchase documents as required. (1) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATES, ORDER THE WORK AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 003-99, 24TH STREET AND GOLDEN AVENUE, AND INSTRUCT THE CITY CLERK TO POST A NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS FOR SAID PROJECT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 18, 2000 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the plans, specifications and estimates, order the work, and call for bids; and 2) Instruct the City Clerk to post a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said project. (m) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING & STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2000-2001 ("DISTRICT") MADE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. 00-6050 AND DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2000. THROUGH JUNE 30, 2001; AND SETTING JUNE 13, 2000, TO ACCEPT PUBLIC INPUT ON THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 3, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 00-6055, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT IN CONNECTION WITH HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2000-2001," made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 00-6050; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 00-6056, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2000-2001. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2000 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2001, AND City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10234 APPOINTING A TIME AND RELATION THERETO." (n) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Supplemental letter from 2000. PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2000. Jim Lissner dated April 19, Action: To receive and file the action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of April 18, 2000. (o) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #25321 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 141-143 MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 00-6057, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25321 FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 141 AND 143 MANHATTAN AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (p) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #25177 FOR A 2 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1036 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 2000. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 00-6058, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25177 FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1036 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 FOR CIP 97- 812, MYRTLE AVENUE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING, APPROVING THE REMOVAL OF VERTICAL -MOUNTED VENT PIPES AND REPLACEMENT WITH FLUSH -MOUNT VENTS FOR $41,256. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams_ dated April 18, 2000. (q) (r) Action: To approve Change Order No. 9 for Project No. CIP 97-182, Myrtle Avenue Utility Undergrounding, approving the removal of vertical -mounted vent pipes and replacement with flush -mounted vents for $41,256, as recommended by staff. (Dunbabin abstained due to a potential conflict of interest) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVENUE, ZEPPY'S PIZZA. Memorandum from Community Development Director. Sol Blumenfeld dated April 19, 2000. City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10235 Action: To adopt Resolution No. 00-6059, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVEJUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT," which reflects the action of the City Council at its March 28, 2000 meeting. (s) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH MAYER & COBLE FOR CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES AND APPROPRIATE $8,000 FOR THE ANTICIPATED COST TO PROVIDE SERVICE FOR REMAINDER OF THE FISCAL YEAR FROM THE GENERAL FUND BALANCE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 20, 2000. Action: To pull this item from the agenda, as requested by staff, and defer action to a future meeting, with Council direction for staff to provide additional information -regarding the current cost and a review of the other bids received. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Item 1(e) was heard at this time but is shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. ZONE CHANGE FROM M-1, LIGHT MANUFACTURING, TO R-2, MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 603 FIRST PLACE, AND 112, 138 AND 142 ARDMORE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 2000 Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:53 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Cheryl Vargo - 5147 Rosecrans Avenue, Hawthorne, representing applicant Mike Mulligan, said they proposed to combine five lots to create one large parcel for a 12 -unit condominium project; said the existing businesses generate traffic but little or no sales tax; said the project exceeds the required development standards and the benefits of a larger project included a City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10236 • 1200 square foot common open green space in the middle ofthe project, as well as larger rear and side setbacks and fewer curb cuts, which. is less impactive to the neighborhood; submitted a map showing the number of units on surrounding properties; Michael Keegan - 1107 Loma Drive, said approval of this project would send a message that the City was increasing density; said the project should be held to 10 units, not 12 units; did not think the parking was adequate, noting the upcoming zoning changes to increase parking; Dan Erikson - 2461 Silverstrand, said the current zoning did not conform to the General Plan; said the lot merger allowed for two additional units which made the project conform more to the neighborhood; said the Beach House on the Strand took advantage of merging lots; and Charlie Cheatum - 548 Second Street, said a petition was submitted at the Planning Commission meeting and many people spoke in opposition to the project, but their concerns were dismissed; said this was the third largest condominium project since he moved into the area and expressed concern about the impacts; said it was hard for existing residents to find parking; requested that the Council reconsider the General Plan and zoning with regard to the south end of town. The public hearing closed at'8:10 P.M. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 00-1198, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FIRST PLACE AND ARDMORE AVENUE AT 603 FIRST PLACE AND 112-142 ARDMORE AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 106 THROUGH 110 INCLUSIVE, WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE," as recommended by the Planning Commission. Motion Bowler, second Dunbabin. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes by Edgerton and Oakes. The meeting recessed at 8:32 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 P.M. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE THE TERM "TWO STORIES" IN THE R-1, R -1A, R-2 AND R -2B ZONES, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 19, 2000 City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10237 Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. He proposed amending Section 4.6.D. of the ordinance to add "roof sheathing" at the end of the parenthetical phrase. The public hearing opened at 9:08 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 9:08 P.M. Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 00-1199, entitled "AN ORDINANCM OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE TWO-STORY MAXIMUM IN THE R-1, R -1A, R-2 AND R -2B ZONES, TO ELIMINATE DEFINITIONS OF STORY AND BASEMENT, AND TO CODIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING, MEASURING AND ENFORCING BUILDING HEIGHT,". as recommended by the Planning Commission, amended by the Council to add "roof sheathing" at the end of the parenthetical phrase • in Section 4.6.D. of the ordinance. Motion Oakes, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 9:13 P.M., the order of the agenda was suspended to go to Municipal Matter item #9. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. ALOHA.DAYS COMMITTEE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF "ALOHA DAYS" LONGBOARD SURF CONTEST AND HAWAIIAN FESTIVAL. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 17, 2000. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, noting that the applicant had withdrawn the request for Proposition A funding. Public participation opened at 9:27 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Abel Ybarra Aloha Days director, submitted signatures from downtown merchants in support of the two-day event; said two days were needed to accommodate all of the athletic contests; agreed to have booths for only one day due to Council concerns about booths for both days. Public participation closed at 9:30 P.M. Action: To approve, as amended, the recommendation of staff and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission to: 1) Approve the request from the Aloha Days Committee to hold their annual surf competition and "Aloha Days" Hawaiian Festival beginning on Saturday, August 12, 2000; City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10238 Approve the requests for fee waivers, City funding of $5,000 from the Downtown Enhancement Fund, and an additional event day on Sunday, August 13, 2000, amended to allow the two-day event to accommodate the athletic competitions, with the booths to be allowed for only one day (either Saturday or Sunday); and 3) Approve the event contract, amended as noted above. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Action: To direct staff to put together some fundraising ideas, such ascorporate sponsorship, for organizations to fund the various community events in order to make them self-sustaining. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7. APPROVAL OF UNCLE BEN'S RICE PROMOTION IN EXCHANGE FOR CONTRIBUTING $10,000 TO SUNSET CONCERTS ON THE BEACH. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 18, 2000. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, noting that the concerts were tentatively scheduled with Dick Dale on July 9, Orquestra la Palabra, a Salsa band, on July 16, and Richard Street, the former lead singer for the Temptations, on July 23. Action: To approve the request from Intrepid Marketing to bring an Uncle Ben's Rice Bowl sampling promotion to the Pier Plaza on Saturday, May 6, 2000, from 10:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. in exchange for a $10,000 donation to Sunset Concerts on the Beach, as recommended by staff. Motion Bowler, second Dunbabin. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 8. FOOD SERVICE INSPECTION ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 20, 2000. At 9:56 P.M., Councilman Bowler left the dais and the room due to a potential conflict of interest. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, noting that adoption of this ordinance would bring the City into consistency with the County Health Department Food Service Grading Program and allow the City's restaurants to receive a certificate from the County showing the letter grade received for posting purposes, adding that not being able to post their good grades would put the City's restaurants at a competitive disadvantage. City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10239 Action: To waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 00-1200, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 8.04 OF TITLE 8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.04 THERETO, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 8 (PUBLIC HEALTH LICENSING) AND DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 11 (HEALTH CODE) OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND PENALTIES," as recommended by staff. Motion Oakes, second Dunbabin. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote by Edgerton and the absence of Bowler. At 10:02 P.M., Councilmember Bowler returned to the dais. 9. PETITION FROM RESIDENTS TO FORM UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT - MONTEREY BOULEVARD. TO PALM DRIVE/PIER AVENUE TO 10TH STREET. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 19, 2000. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 9:22 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jim Lissner Hermosa Beach, said undergrounding gets rid of visual blight by eliminating the poles and wires; suggested getting rid of the visual blight at night caused by the cobra -head type light fixtures and suggested requiring their conversion to zero cut-off fixtures. Public participation closed at 9:23 P.M. Action: To approve funding for preliminary engineering and direct staff to work with Southern California Edison and return with contracts for project consultants for the formation of an underground utility district in an area bounded by Monterey Boulevard, Palm Drive, Pier Avenue and 10th Street. Motion Dunbabin, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Councilmember Oakes asked staff to look at the issues of timelines for residents to comply with their own construction, with the City helping to find reasonably priced contractors; a review of the placement of the vaults/vents; and making residents aware of their options with regard to the actual light fixtures, noting that residents might appreciate something better than the standard overheads, even ifthey cost more. Mayor Reviczky noted that the vent locations were generally determined by the location of the underground structures; said more costly light fixtures may result in City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10240 • increased maintenance costs to the City if the poles are City owned; and asked staff to explore giving the district the option of outsourcing the engineering if Edison could not do it in an expeditious manner. Councilmember Edgerton expressed concern about the fairness hearing coming at the end of theprocess and wanted to ensure that the role of the Council was clear to everyone. At 9:25 P.M., the order of the agenda returned to item 6. .10. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND 1303 HERMOSA AVENUE, LLC, FOR BUILDING IN FRONT OF PARKING STRUCTURE. (This item was added to the agenda this evening as an urgency item.) City Attorney Jenkins said before closing the lessee's construction loan, .the lender wanted.an amendment that grants the City's permission for the tenant to encumber the property with a deed of trust, giving the lender a property interest, with the building becoming security for repayment of. the loan. He said the remaining provisions provide protection to the lender in the event there is a default by the tenant, by obligating the City to provide the lender with notice, and giving the lender the right to step in and cure any default, take over the lease and operate the premises. He said if the lender were to sell to a third party, the City would have the same right to approve that prospective buyer. He said it was a fairly standard document that would be expected by a lender. He said he reviewed the document and made some minor suggestions. for changes in the language, which had been incorporated in the document presented this evening. He said the lessee wants to close the loan and get moving on the project and the item came to the City's attention after the agenda had been posted. Action: To approve the amendment lease, as presented. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a. unanimous vote, with Edgerton noting that he was able to vote on the issue since he no longer had a potential conflict of interest. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED .IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on March 28, 2000. City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10241 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Property: Negotiating Parties: Under Negotiation: 4181-024-900 (Southeast corner of 27th Street and Manhattan Avenue) Stephen Burrell Jay A. Mitchell Price & Terms of Payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association Hermosa Beach Police Management Association ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on .Tuesday, April 25, 2000, at the hour of 10:08 P.M. to a closed session. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - The Closed Session convened at the hour of 10:18 P.M. At the hour of 11:00 P.M., the Closed .Session adjourned to the, Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS - There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, March 28, 2000, at the hour of 11:01 P.M. to the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Tuesday, May 2, 2000, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. to review proposed changes to residential development standards. City Council Minutes 04-25-00 Page 10242 //t VOUCHRE2 04/18/00 10:08 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 21041 04/18/00 003270 JOHN BOWLER PER DIEM/CALED CONFERENCE 001-1101-4317 100.00 100.00 TOTAL CHECKS 100.00 1U' • i VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/18/00 10:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 100.00 TOTAL 100.00 PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 04/19/00 11:09 • . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 21042 04/20/00 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 001-1103 284,623.66 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 105-1103 7,024.39 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 109-1103 805.38 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 110-1103 28,441.13 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 117-1103 622.04 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 145-1103 1,426.52 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 152-1103 54.61 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 160-1103 6,961.54 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 705-1103 2,416.98 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 715-1103 4,709.84 PAYROLL 4/01 TO 4/15/00 150-1103 285.45 337,371.54 TOTAL CHECKS 337,371.54 3 VOUCHRE2 04/19/00 11:09 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 284,623.66 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 7,024.39 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 805.38 110 PARKING FUND 28,441.13 117 AB939 FUND 622.04 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,426.52 150 GRANTS FUND 285.45 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 54.61 160 SEWER FUND 6,961.54 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,416.98 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 4,709.84 TOTAL 337,371.54 y • PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 04/20/00 17:26 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 21043 04/20/00 000029 A-1 COAST SANITATION, I 21044 21045 21046 21047 21048 21049 21050 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 007775 009085 006170 000163 AON RISK SERVICES,INC BLACKMORE MASTER DISTRI BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 003372 CA EMS PERSONNEL FUND 005595 CALIFORNIA CHARTER 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC 21051 04/20/00 007611 CARMEN'S UNIFORM 21052 04/20/00 000634 CHEVRON USA, INC. 21053 04/20/00 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION 21054 04/20/00 010182 COMMAND COLLEGE ALUMNI 21055 04/20/00 009614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SER 21056 04/20/00 003674 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL S 21057 04/20/00 008601 CPOA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION SANITATION UNIT/3/10-4/7/00 SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV PUBLIC OFFICIALS BOND/BURRELL PRISONER MEALS/APRIL 2000 CODEMASTER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PRISONER LAUNDRY/FEB 2000 PRISONER LAUNDRY/FEB 2000 PRISONER LAUNDRY/MARCH 2000 PRISONER LAUNDRY/MARCH 2000 PRISONER LAUNDRY/MARCH 2000 PRISONER LAUNDRY/FEB 2000 PRISONER LAUNDRY/FEB 2000 PRISONER LAUNDRY/MARCH 2000 EMS -PARAMEDIC RENEWAL/MARKS TRANSPORTATION/EXCURSION WATER BILLING/APRIL 2000 WATER BILLING/APRIL 2000 WATER BILLING/APRIL 2000 WATER BILLING/APRIL 2000 WATER BILLING/APRIL 2000 UNIFORM PANTS/LEWITT GAS CARD BILLING/APRIL 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 2000 MEMBERSHIP/LAVIN 300' NOTICING 300' NOTICING TESTING MATERIALS REGISTRATION/CONFERENCE 5 • ACCOUNT NUMBER 160-3102-4201 001-2102-4201 705-1210-4201 001-2101-4306 001-1121-4201 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2201-4315 145-3409-4201 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-2101-4187 715-2101-4310 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-2101-4317 001-4101-4201 001-4101-4201 001-1203-4201 001-2101-4317 ITEM AMOUNT 97.43 3,053.25 946.00 136.72 750.00 25.70 25.70 30.34 25.70 25.70 25.70 28.26 28.91 130.00 305.16 266.94 190.61 1,208.55 3.52 372.96 48.66 329.23 92.28 5.12 92.28 5.12 92.28 5.12 92.92 5.12 269.07 5.12 25.00 3,920.00 225.00 1,037.50 895.00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 3,150.68 946.00 136.72 750.00 216.01 130.00 305.16 2,042.58 48.66 329.23 664.43 25.00 4,145.00 1,037.50 895.00 VOUCHRE2 04/20/00 17:26 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 21058 04/20/00 21059 04/20/00 21060 04/20/00 21061 04/20/00 21062 04/20/00 21063 04/20/00 21064 04/20/00 21065 04/20/00 21066 21067 21068 21069 21070 21071 21072 21073 21074 21075 21076 21077 21078 21079 21080 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 04/20/00 000642 000047 010184 004689 000154 000049 000267 000147 001962 009531 008266 008931 008652 000015 010181 006518 010175 009820 007587 002458 04/20/00 010177 04/20/00 001165 04/20/00 006010 VENDOR NAME THE DAILY BREEZE DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL STEVE DANTZING DATA TICKET, INC. DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVAT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT THE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. FIRSTLINE, LLC FLEMING & ASSOCIATES FLEMING & ASSOCIATES,TR MICHAEL GAROFANO GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO GYPSUM ASSOCIATION HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH KATHLEEN S HOLLISTER HOZIE'S RADIATOR INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE LISA JENNINGS JOBS AVAILABLE JAMES KELLEY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION RECRUITMENT ADS/MARCH 2000 ANNUAL PHYSICAL/LAVIN POLICE FEES REFUNDED DMV RECORD RETRIEVALJ4/2000 SHELTER SERVICES/JAN 2000 STRONG MOTION MAPPING FEE SIGNAL & LIGHTING MAINT/MARCH FILM DEVELOPMENT/MARCH 2000 FILM & PROCESSING/MARCH 2000 FILM AND PROCESSING/MARCH 2000 FILM PROCESSING/MARCH 2000 FILM & PROCESSING/MARCH 2000 EXPRESS MAIL/MARCH 2000 MEDICAL GLOVES PURCHASE 4TH QUARTER LIABILITY ADMIN WORKER COMP CLAIMS/4/1-4/15/00 EXPENSE REIMBURS/TRAINING PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2000 PUBLICATIONS TEMP BUILD INSPECT/3/16-30/00 CSMFO CHAPTER LUNCHEON INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 2000 RADIATOR PURCHASE/APRIL 2000 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/MARCH 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND RECRUITMENT AD/APRIL 2000 CLASS REFUND 6 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4320 001-2111 110-1204-4201 110-3302-4251 001-3204 105-2601-4251 001-2101-4305 001-4202-4309 001-2201-4305 001-2201-4305 001-2201-4305 001-4202-4201 001-2201-4309 705-1209-4201 705-1217-4324 001-2201-4317 001-4601-4304 001-4201-4315 001-4201-4201 001-1202-4317 001-4601-4221 715-3302-4311 105-2601-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-2111 001-1203-4201 001-2111 ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 311.58 311.58 400.00 400.00 1,495.00 1,495.00 96.18 96.18 23.76 23.76 1,095.86 1,095.86 1,531.79 1,531.79 60.13 54.60 30.27 19.16 71.63 235.79 19.48 19.48 119.08 119.08 2,193.75 2,193.75 3,680.54 3,680.54 210.56 210.56 78.42 78.42 43.35 43.35 3,060.00 3,060.00 75.00 75.00 168.00 168.00 290.11 290.11 771.01 14.51 14.51- 771.01 500.00 500.00 147.20 147.20 26.50 26.50 VOUCHRE2 04/20/00 17:26 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 21081 04/20/00 006293 KINKO'S INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION COLORED PAPER PURCHASE COPY SERVICES/MARCH 2000 SIGNS LAMINATED VOTER PARKING 21082 04/20/00 007859 L.A. CO METRO TRANS AUT BUS PASS SALES/APRIL 2000 21083 04/20/00 010168 LARSON PRODUCTS INC. WINDMILL PARTS 21084 04/20/00 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 21085 04/20/00 009737 LESLIE SOLYMOSI 21086 04/20/00 009696 LOS ANGELES AREA FIRE C 21087 04/20/00 000213 LOS ANGELES TIMES 21088 04/20/00 007847 LUDOVICA & DOUWE LUIKS 21089 04/20/00 000605 MANHATTAN FORD 21090 04/20/00 008975 •MOBIL FLEET 21091 04/20/00 000388 21092 04/20/00 001494 21093 04/20/00 009854 21094 04/20/00 010180 21095 04/20/00 004142 21096 04/20/00 002487 MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPOR NATIONAL EMBLEM NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS GARY OACONELLI OFFICE DEPOT HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 2000 LUMBER PURCHASE/APRIL 2000 BEE REMOVAL/APRIL 2000 TRAINING ACADEMY/SCOTT RECRUITMENT AD/MARCH 2000 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE AUTO PART PURCHASES/MARCH 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASES/APRIL 2000 GAS CARD BILLING/MARCH 2000 UNIFORM EMBLEMS/FIRE CELL PHONE BILLING/APRIL 2000 CITATION REFUND CARD TABLES FOR CLARK BUILDING SOFTWARE PURCHASE/MARCH 2000 PAGING NETWORK OF ORANG PAGER BILLING/FEB 2000 PAGER BILLING/FEB 2000 PAGER BILLING/FEB 2000 PAGER BILLING/FEB 2000 PAGER BILLING/FEB 2000 7 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4305 001-4202-4201 001-3104-4309 145-3403-4251 001-2125 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 110-3302-4201 001-2201-4317 001-1203-4201 105-3105 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4310 715-2201-4310 715-4201-4310 715-4202-4310 715-3302-4310 715-3104-4310 715-4601-4310 715-2601-4310 715-3102-4310 715-4204-4310 715-4206-4310 001-1250 715-1236 715-2101-4310 001-2201-4187 001-2101-4304 110-3302 001-4601-4305 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 4.33 76.90 75.78 208.00 62.69 56.77 32.22 85.00 50.00 150.00 24.61 117.04 2,625.51 264.38 83.16 350.17 231.89 240.38 28.56 214.03 76.71 12.47 34.28 59.81 140.52 99.13 336.78 326.86 104.00 64.93 16.23 81.25 2.50 2.50 15.00 40.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 157.01 208.00 62.69 88.99 85.00 50.00 150.00 24.61 117.04 4,361.87 99.13 336.78 326.86 104.00 81.16 VOUCHRE2 04/20/00 17:26 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 21097 04/20/00 009776 21098 04/20/00 000097 21099 04/20/00 006397 21100 04/20/00 007254 21101 04/20/00 007518 21102 04/20/00 010176 21103 04/20/00 009656 21104 04/20/00 000146 21105 04/20/00 010183 21106 04/20/00 009822 21107 04/20/00 005693 21108 04/20/00 004768 • BRUCE PEROVICH POSTMASTER SCANTRONICS MICROFILM S POLLYANNA SCHNEIDER JULES SELTZER & ASSOC. DENNIS E. SHELTON SHRED IT CALIFORNIA SPARKLETTS DRINKING WAT SHELLY TAUGNER TMT -PATHWAY TOOL CITY UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 21109 04/20/00 003353 VISA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGER BILLING/FEB 2000 PAGER BILLING/MARCH 2000 PAGER BILLING/MARCH 2000 PAGER BILLING/MARCH 2000 PAGER BILLING/MARCH 2000 PAGER BILLING/MARCH 2000 PAGER BILLING/MARCH 2000 ENTERTAINMENT EGG-STRAVAGANZA P D ANNUAL P.O. BOX RENTAL MICROFILM SERVICES/APRIL 2000 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE DEPOSIT DUE/OFFICE CREDENZA CITATION REFUND DESTRUCTION SERVICES/APRIL DRINKING WATER & DISPENSER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND CURB PAINT PURCHASE/MARCH POWER ACTUATED FASTENER PRINTER PURCHASE/WARRANTY PRINTER PURCHASE & TONER HOTEL DEPOSIT/STRASER HOTEL CHARGES/OAKS MEETING EXPENSES/BURRELL CONFERENCE/BOWLER ORAL BOARD LUNCHES/MAR 2000 21110 04/20/00 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-1206-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4201 001-4601-4201 001-2101-4201 001-4201-4201 105-3105 001-4601-5402 110-3302 001-2101-4201 001-4601-4305 001-2111 001-3104-4309 001-4204-5401 715-1206-5402 715-1206-5402 001-2101-4317 001-1101-4317 001-1201-4317 001-1101-4317 001-1203-4201 001-1202-4317 001-4601-4308 001-1101-4305 715-1206-4309 001-4101-4305 715-2101-4310 001-2101-4305 001-2201-4187 001-2201-4309 001-4101-4317 001-4204-4309 001-4201-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 2.50 83.00 2.50 2.50 15.00 40.00 2.50 250.00 114.00 289.03 24.61 1,912.43 50.00 75.00 101.90 500.00 1,158.29 252.22 3,235.53 1,617.76 99.47 164.88 19.45 450.00 133.82 10.00 37.83 18.62 54.08 42.21 2.00 90.29 20.00 16.24 32.00 86.55 5.40 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 289.25 250.00 114.00 289.03 24.61 1,912.43 50.00 75.00 101.90 500.00 1,158.29 252.22 4,853.29 867.62 VOUCHRE2 04/20/00 17:26 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH/3/30-4/17 21111 04/20/00 010154 YOUNG SALES COMPANY TENSABARRIERS PURCHASE 21112 04/20/00 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES STREET SIGNS TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4202-4317 001-4204-4201 001-1203-4305 001-4601-5401 001-3104-4309 PAGE 5 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 100.00 30.00 7.65 552.87 1,115.92 1,115.92 470.89 470.89 50,525.39 • VOUCHRE2 04/20/00 17:26 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 30,306.01 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 2,352.02 110 PARKING FUND 384.54 145 PROPOSITION $A FUND 513.16 160 SEWER FUND 97.43 705 INSURANCE FUND 6,820.29 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 10,051.94 TOTAL 50,525.39 ID PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 04/27/00 16:35 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 21113 04/27/00 010188 A & A DEVELOPMENT 21114 04/27/00 010209 ROSE MARY ABELSON 21115 04/27/00 010199 BARBARA ADAMS 21116 04/27/00 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2110 CITATION REFUND EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 SPEAKER FOR THE JAIL 21117 04/27/00 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE MAT SERVICE/MARCH 2000 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/MARCH SHOP TOWELS/MARCH 2000 MAT SERVICES/MARCH 2000 MAT SERVICE/MARCH 2000 MAT SERVICE/MARCH 2000 SHOP TOWEL SERVICES/MARCH 2000 SHOP TOWELS/MARCH 2000 MAT SERVICE/MARCH 2000 MAT SERVICE/MARCH 2000 MAT SERVICE/MARCH 2000 MAT SERVICE/MARCH 2000 SHOPTOWELS/MARCH 2000 SHOP TOWEL SERVICES/MAR 2000 21118 04/27/00 006100 ARCUS DATA SECURITY OFF SITE STORAGE/MARCH 2000 21119 04/27/00 005179 AT&T 21120 04/27/00 008630 AVIS 21121 04/27/00 010193 DANIEL BLOCK LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/4/2000 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/4/00 LONG DISTANCE FAXES/4/2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/APRIL 00 LONG DISTANCE BILLING/4/2000 CITATION REFUND CITATION REFUND CITATION REFUND 21122 04/27/00 008522 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC. MEDICAL SUPPLIES/APRIL 2000 21123 04/27/00 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT DOWNTOWN LOT CLEANING/MAR 2000 STREET SWEEPING/MARCH 2000 PROMENADE SPECIAL CLEANING 21124 04/27/00 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC WATER BILLING/MARCH 2000 WATER BILLING/MARCH 2000 WATER BILLING/MARCH 2000 21125 04/27/00 008811 DIANE CLEARY MINUTES & TRANSCRIPTION 21126 04/27/00 009614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SER 300' NOTICING 21127 04/27/00 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES/JAN 2000 I1 110-3302 001-2111 001-2101-4307 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2101-4201 001-4204-4201 001-2201-4309 715-4206-4309 715-1206-4201 001-2101-4304 715-1206-4304 001-2101-4309 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302 110-3302 110-3302 001-2201-4309 109-3301-4201 001-3104-4201 109-3301-4201 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4101-4201 001-4101-4201 001-1208-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 1,600.00 30.00 38.00 211.21 60.22 29.05 13.80 51.46 41.18 60.22 28.30 13.80 51.46 41.18 41.18 60.22 15.18 28.30 117.33 8.71 8.71 12.09 12.08 12.08 20.00 70.00 5.00 314.25 6,250.00 12,200.00 1,000.00 638.35 996.40 572.09 160.00 225.00 21.89 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 1,600.00 30.00 38.00 211.21 535.55 117.33 53.67 90.00 5.00 314.25 19,450.00 2,206.84 160.00 225.00 VOUCHRE2 04/27/00 16:35 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME 21128 04/27/00 007700 CPRS 21129 04/27/00 000850 L. N. CURTIS 21130 04/27/00 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. 21131 04/27/00 009112 DMR TEAM 21132 04/27/00 008147 ELLIOTT DIAMOND INC. 21133 04/27/00 008661 EMERG SPEC PHYS MEDICAL 21134 04/27/00 010195 RUTH ENGLISH 21135 04/27/00 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION RETURNED OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES/MARCH 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE OFFICE SUPPLIES/MAR 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/MAR 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JAN 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/JAN 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/FEB 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/MAR 2000 3" 3 RING BINDERS OFFICE SUPPLIES/MAR 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/MAR 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/MARCH 2000 ANSWERING MACHINE PURCHASE OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/APRIL 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JAN 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/JAN 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE OFFICE SUPPLIES/JAN 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/FEB 2000 JOBLINE RECRUITMENT AD BOOTS/DALE DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/12/99 CHANGE ORDER #1 RESURFACING HERMOSA AVE. CONCRETE SAW BLADES PRISONER MEDICAL EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 JANITORIAL SERVICES/MARCH 2000 JANITORIAL SERVICES/MARCH 2000 JANITORIA SERVICES/MARCH 2000 JANITORIAL SERVICES/MARCH 2000 JANITORIAL SERVICES/MARCH 2000 JANITORIAL SERVICES/MARCH 2000 JANITORIAL SERVICES/MARCH 2000 21136 04/27/00 010196 FELICIA FALCONE CLASS REFUND/SPRING 2000 j2 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1121-4201 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1203-4201 001-2201-4187 110-1204-4201 146-8150-4201 146-8150-4201 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4201 001-2111 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-2111 ITEM AMOUNT 21.89- 111.38 4.64- 281.79 16.15 1.07 420.46 6.78- 45.83- 116.13 218.02 16.81- 1,291.96 213.96 7.47- 15.66 53.04 193.42 42.70 47.33 308.03 1,190.75 21.89- 6.31- 45.83 45.83- 41.00 90.02 280.28 1,800.00 5,492.00 863.47 260.00 21.00 1,200.00 750.00 950.00 290.00 365.00 3,370.00 325.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 4,412.12 41.00 90.02 280.28 7,292.00 863.47 260.00 21.00 7,250.00 35.00 35.00 VOUCHRE2 04/27/00 16:35 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 21137 04/27/00 010200 MARGARET FEENEY 21138 04/27/00 010197 PAT FUEHRING 21139 04/27/00 010064 LISA GRANTHAM 21140 04/27/00 009056 GTE INTERNETWORKING 21141 04/27/00 010205 DUSHON HARRIS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 001-2111 42.00 42.00 001-2111 19.00 19.00 TO REPLACE CHECK LOST IN MAIL 001-2111 E-MAIL/WEB PAGE STORAGE/APRIL 715-1206-4304 EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 21142 04/27/00 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP BUILDING INSPECT/4/3-13 21143 04/27/00 010128 21144 04/27/00 010212 21145 04/27/00 010201 21146 04/27/00 010198 21147 04/27/00 006293 HERMOSA CYCLERY SHIRLEY HERVIG ANNA KANE JONATHAN KETCHAM KINKO'S INC. 21148 04/27/00 007793 LAWSON PRODUCTS 21149 04/27/00 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 21150 04/27/00 002175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY SAFETY EQUIPMENT/SKATE TRACK 30.00 30.00 135.90 135.90 001-2111 21.00 21.00 001-4201-4201 2,720.00 2,720.00 001-4601-4308 284.68 284.68 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302 EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 COPYING/LOMA & MRYTLE MATERIALS FOR RESTORATION BUILDING SUPPLIES/APRIL 2000 MARCH 2000 LEGAL BILLINGS 21151 04/27/00 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI PRISONER LAB TEST PRISONER LAB TEST CITATION REFUND EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 CITATION REFUND CITATION REFUND PHYSICAL EXAMS/MAR 2000 CITATION REFUND EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 21152 04/27/00 010192 WADE LOHN 21153 04/27/00 007252 ELEANOR LYNN 21154 04/27/00 010207 BARBARA MCDADE 21155 04/27/00 010211 BRENT MCGOLDRICK 21156 04/27/00 001911 MEDICAL INSTITUTE 21157 04/27/00 010210 STEPHANIE MENNELLA 21158 04/27/00 005848 DIANE MILLER 21159 04/27/00 010190 MIRA COSTA HIGH SCHOOL BAND PERFORMANCE/WINDMILL 21160 04/27/00 008170 MUNICIPAL MAINT. EQUIPM PARTS FOR GO -4 PARTS FOR GO -4 PARTS FOR GO -4 13 20.00 20.00 001-2111 21.00 21.00 001-2111 21.00 21.00 001-4202-4201 569.07 569.07 001-2125 62.69 62.69 001-4204-4309 10.20 10.20 001-1203-4201 4,266.00 4,266.00 001-2101-4201 61.00 001-2101-4201 39.50 100.50 110-3302 30.00 30.00 001-2111 19.00 19.00 110-3302 8.00 8.00 110-3302 10.00 10.00 001-1203-4320 210.00 210.00 110-3302 10.00 10.00 001-2111 38.00 38.00 001-2125 200.00 200.00 715-3302-4311 393.05 715-3302-4311 53.42 715-3302-4311 107.76 554.23 VOUCHRE2 04/27/00 16:35 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME 21161 04/27/00 009573 S. DOREEN MYHERS 21162 04/27/00 010194 DAVID NEWINGHAM 21163 04/27/00 004356 SHELDON OSEKOWSKY 21164 04/27/00 002487 PAGING NETWORK OF ORANG 21165 04/27/00 007158 PEEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL 21166 04/27/00 008482 PMX MEDICAL SPECIALTY 21167 04/27/00 009833 THE RAMONA PAGEANT ASSO 21168 04/27/00 008926 KIM REA 21169 04/27/00 007511 REDONDO BCH UNIFIED SCH 21170 04/27/00 003991 BARRY REED 21171 04/27/00 010186 BETTY RYAN 21172 04/27/00 010059 JERRY SALATICH 21173 04/27/00 010185 JUDY SCOTT 21174 04/27/00 009139 SECURED STORAGE 21175 04/27/00 010206 GLORIA SEVILLE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION EXCURSION REFUND/APRIL 2000 RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT PAGER BILLING/APRIL 2000 PAGER BILLING/APRIL 2000 PAGER BILLING/APRIL 2000 PAGER BILLING/APRIL 2000 PAGER BILLING/APRIL 2000 PAGER BILLING/APRIL 2000 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/MAR 2000 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT FINAL PAYMENT FOR EXCURSION CITATION REFUND BAND PERFORMANCE/WINDMILL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 2000 EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 OVER THE LINE TOURNAMENT/4/00 EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 STORAGE CHARGES/2ND QRT EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 21176 04/27/00 009353 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SPRING 00 21177 04/27/00 003285 JOAN SLEMMONS 21178 04/27/00 010208 MATTHEW SMITH 21179 04/27/00 010187 SCOTT SMITH CAMP FEE REFUND/SPRING 2000 CITATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 2000 21180 04/27/00 000113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUI BREAK A WAY CAP HOOD SYSTEM SERVICED/4/12/00 GOGGLES & EAR PLUGS EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 PARKING. PERMIT REFUND 21181 04/27/00 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS 21182 04/27/00 010204 STARR SPENCE 21183 04/27/00 010189 DIANNE STASO )y ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2111 001-2111 001-2201-4317 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4201 105-2601-4201 001-2201-4309 001-4601-4201 110-3302 001-2125 001-4601-4221 001-2111 001-4601-4221 001-2111 001-1121-4201 001-2111 001-4601-4221 001-2111 110-3302 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4309 001-4204-4321 105-2601-4309 001-2111• 110-3843 ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 76.00 76.00 500.00 500.00 114.00 114.00 79.96 2.50 2.50 15.00 40.00 2.50 142.46 151.65 151.65 108.88 108.88 133.00 133.00 50.00 50.00 200.00 200.00 1,176.00 1,176.00 19.00 19.00 371.00 371.00 40.00 40.00 24.00 24.00 42.00 42.00 405.00 405.00 160.00 160.00 10.00 10.00 403.20 403.20 9.20 328.25 337.45 77.20 77.20 21.00 21.00 29.00 29.00 VOUCHRE2 04/27/00 16:35 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 21184 04/27/00 010203 NORMA STEINLEITNER 21185 04/27/00 010202 RANNY THOMPSON 21186 04/27/00 009153 TOSCO FLEET SERVICES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 EXCURSION REFUND/SPRING 2000 GAS PURCHASES/MAR 2000 GAS PURCHASES/MAR 2000 GAS PURCHASES/MAR 2000 GAS PURCHASES/MAR 2000 21187 04/27/00 009078 TRUGREEN LAND CARE REGI LANDSCAPING MAINT LANDSCAPING MAINT 21188 04/27/00 007909 TUESDAY FILMS OFFICE CHAIR PURCHASE 21189 04/27/00 002656 WESSEL MECHANICAL SERVI TO REPLACE CHECK LOST IN MAIL 21190 04/27/00 007106 JENNIFER YAMANE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SPRING 2000 TOTAL CHECKS 15 I ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2111 001-2111 715-2201-4310 715-3104-4310 715-3102-4310 715-1236 001-4202-4201 105-2601-4201 170-2103-5401 160-3102-4201 001-4601-4221 ITEM AMOUNT 42.00 21.00 500.21 35.11 35.11 34.29 10,900.00 1,400.00 446.21 4,480.00 1,234.80 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 42.00 21.00 604.72 12,300.00 446.21 4,480.00 1,234.80 78,703.58 • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/27/00 16:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 54,874.77 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 2,267.20 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 7,250.00 110 PARKING FUND 584.36 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 7,292.00 160 SEWER FUND 4,480.00 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 446.21 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,509.04 TOTAL 78,703.58 PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 05/04/00 07:25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 21191 05/04/00 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 001-1103 330,638.47 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 105-1103 8,821.87 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 109-1103 944.62 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 110-1103 34,715.02 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 117-1103 726.67 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 145-1103 1,686.80 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 150-1103 819.67 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 152-1103 1.39 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 160-1103 8,774.56 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 705-1103 2,711.34 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-00 715-1103 5,776.40 395,616.81 TOTAL CHECKS 395,616.81 11 • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 05/04/00 07:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 330,638.47 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 8,821.87 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 944.62 110 PARKING FUND 34,715.02 117 AB939 FUND 726.67 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,686.80 150 GRANTS FUND 819.67 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 1.39 160 SEWER FUND 8,774.56 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,711.34 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 5,776.40. TOTAL 395,616.81 18 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 05/04/00 07:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES / TO aINCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR SL//97 e,- Sl 6 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DDIRECTOR DATE /©p PAGE 3 April 25, 2000 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council May 9, 2000 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below: #20804 — 03/27/00 - $ 136.40 Diversified Photo Supply. Duplicate check. Check was never mailed. #21083 — 04/20/00 - $ 62.69 Larson Products, Inc.. Purchase order was made out to the wrong vendor. Check was never mail. #20894 — 04/04/00 - $ 91.56 Quality Suites. Check was unused. Check was never mailed. Concur: ill lgOlAk: AEA xr-.) Step'- . s urrell, City reneger Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director May 4, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 9, 2000 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 2000/2001 City Council Goals/Workplan City Manager Recommendation to approve action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2000 Community Development Director Recommendation to approve action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of May 2, 2000 Monthly Activity Reports - April Community Resources Director All Departments Recommendation to approve action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of June 20, 2000 Community Development Director Public Hearing: Text amendment regarding nonconforming remodel Section 17.52. Public Heraing: Text amendment regarding lot coverage exception Section 17.04. Community Development Director Community Development Director Monthly Activity Reports - May All Departments Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 9, 2000 May 4, 2000 City Council Meeting of REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS MARCH 2000 Attached are the March 2000 Revenue and Expenditure reports. General Fund revenue is 71.4% received for 75.0% of the fiscal year. Adjusting for property taxes receivable, revenue would be 75.4%. Parking Fund revenue is 70.7% received. General Fund expenditures are 62.3% expended and Parking Fund expenditures are 71.7% expended for 75.0% of the fiscal year. NOTED: Steph R. u rell,' City Manager Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director h:\b95\open\revexp.doc REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 3,536,023.00 .00 2,044,162.50 1,491,860.50 57.8 3102 CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 247,593.00 26,319.08 244,019.23 3,573.77 98.6 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 166,074.00 4,863.91- 100,140.51 65,933.49 60.3 3106 SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 31,626.00 3,727.77 47,281.54 15,655.54- 149.5 3107 TRANSFER TAX 154,000.00 16,996.09 116,162.26 37,837.74 75.4 3108 SALES TAX 2,311,722.00 204,315.78 1,655,530.90 656,191.10 71.6 3109 1/2 CENT SALES TX EXT 137,519.00 16,221.47 83,437.52 54,081.48 60.7 3110 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 190,000.00 .00 100,959.37 89,040.63 53.1 3111 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 46,796.00 .00 .00 46,796.00 0.0 3112 GAS FRANCHISE 38,850.00 .00 .00 38,850.00 0.0 3113 REFUSE FRANCHISE 170,000.00 .00 89,558.61 80,441.39 52.7 3114 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 653,170.00 .00 549,736.27 103,433.73 84.2 3115 BUSINESS LICENSE 600,000.00 38,142.58 368,105.38 231,894.62 61.4 3120 UTILITY USER TAX 1,600,000.00 144,239.30 1,203,277.73 396,722.27 75.2 TAXES 9,883,373.00 445,098.16 6,602,371.82 3,281,001.18 66.8 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 DOG LICENSES 10,201.00 455.00 9,916.50 284.50 97.2 3203 BICYCLE LICENSES 100.00 28.00 42.00 58.00 42.0 3204 BUILDING PERMITS 340,340.00 37,030.96 263,405.89 76,934.11 77.4 3205 ELECTRIC PERMITS 46,000.00 4,228.00 46,031.00 31.00- 100.1 3206 PLUMBING PERMITS 40,250.00 6,186.00 37,795.75 2,454.25 93.9 3207 OCCUPANCY PERMITS 6,000.00 506.00 4,534.00 1,466.00 75.6 3209 GARAGE SALES 100.00 3.00 66.00 34.00 66.0 3211 BANNER PERMITS 6,300.00 1,075.00 3,840.00 2,460.00 61.0 3212 ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 200.00 .00 112.25 87.75 56.1 3213 ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 2,600.00 145.00 2,220.00 380.00 85.4 3214 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 600.00 41.00 610.00 10.00- 101.7 3215 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 340.00 35.00 348.00 8.00- 102.4 3216 SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 125.00 .00 85.00 40.00 68.0 3217 OPEN FIRE PERMIT 350.00 .00 48.00 302.00 13.7 3218 AUTO REPAIR PERMIT 2,400.00 134.00 2,630.00 230.00- 109.6 3225 TAXICAB PERMITS 25,000.00 3,685.00 38,710.00 13,710.00- 154.8 LICENSES AND PERMITS 480,906.00 53,551.96 410,394.39 70,511.61 85.3 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 205,000.00 23,466.21 150,202.74 54,797.26 73.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 222,600.00 12,783.33 105,052.65 117,547.35 47.2 3402 RENTS & CONCESSIONS 1,181.00 29.65 901.11 279.89 76.3 3403 PIER REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 3404 COMM CTR LEASES 95,597.00 7,381.31 73,000.39 22,596.61 76.4 3405 COMM CTR RENTALS 40,000.00 3,577.50 30,750.01 9,249.99 76.9 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3406 COMM CTR THEATRE 35,000.00 5,428.50 33,954.50 1,045.50 97.0 3411 OTHER FACILITIES 18,000.00 2,079.00 15,185.50 2,814.50 84.4 3412 TENNIS COURTS 10,000.00 1,005.75 8,717.75 1,282.25 87.2 3418 SPECIAL EVENTS 50,000.00 1,163.00 23,318.00 26,682.00 46.6 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 513.00 234.58 902.87 389.87- 176.0 3460 UNREALIZED GAIN(LOSS) ON INV .00 .00 10.24- 10.24 *** 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 2,993.00- 290.76- 2,566.69- 426.31- 85.8 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 469,898.00 33,391.86 289,205.85 180,692.15 61.5 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 347.00 .00 347.82 .82- 100.2 3505 IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 900,000.00 74,486.07 695,901.69 204,098.31 77.3 3507 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 9,800.00 .00 5,036.88 4,763.12 51.4 3508 MANDATED COSTS 26,576.00 7,574.00 21,009.00 5,567.00 79.1 3509 HOMEOWNR PROP TX RELIEF 62,000.00 .00 32,395.72 29,604.28 52.3 3510 POST 10,000.00 .00 7,314.38 2,685.62 73.1 3511 STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 5,750.00 .00 862.50 4,887.50 15.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 1,014,473.00 82,060.07 762,867.99 251,605.01 75.2 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3801 RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 13,500.00 1,242.00 11,564.00 1,936.00 85.7 3802 SIGN REVIEW 2,275.00 465.00 1,765.00 510.00 77.6 3803 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 2,010.00 343.00 1,029.00 981.00 51.2 3805 CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 1,850.00 372.00 735.00 1,115.00 39.7 3806 BOARD OF APPEALS 170.00 .00 .00 170.00 0.0 3808 ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 8,575.00 1,075.00 7,500.00 1,075.00 87.5 3809 TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW .00 1,070.00 1,070.00 1,070.00- *** 3810 FINAL MAP REVIEW 4,590.00 .00 2,859.00 1,731.00 62.3 3811 ZONE CHANGE/GEN PLAN AMEND 4,188.00 .00 1,396.00 2,792.00 33.3 3812 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 28 112.00 6,103.00 22,371.00 5,741.00 79.6 3813 PLAN CHECK FEES 272,200.00 27, 808.40 173 910.80 98 289.20 63.9 3814 PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 368.00 .00 740.00 372.00- 201.1 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 8,000.00 238.00 8,072.50 72.50- 100.9 3818 POLICE SERVICES 4,000.00 224.32 2,328.12 1,671.88 58.2 3819 JAIL SERVICES 15,000.00 2,320.00 16,009.00 1,009.00- 106.7 3821 FINGERPRINT SERVICE 1,152.00 .00 1,152.00 .00 100.0 3823 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 35,000.00 1,950.00 20,674.00 14,326.00 59.1 3825 PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 32.00 .00 64.00 32.00- 200.0 3827 LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 6,900.00 6,601.00 6,601.00 299.00 95.7 3831 STREET CUT INSPECTION 50,000.00 5,215.00 47,796.10 2,203.90 95.6 3833 RECREATION SERVICE CHARGES 5,500.00 447.00 4,178.53 1,321.47 76.0 3834 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 57,000.00 1,233.55 40,780.20 16,219.80 71.5 3837 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 700.00 90.00 320.00 380.00 45.7 3838 SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIONS 150.00 10.00 117.55 32.45 78.4 3839 PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 800.00 24.00 522.01 277.99 65.3 3840 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 100,000.00 5,168.98 74,986.59 25,013.41 75.0 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3841 POLICE TOWING 25,000.00 2,214.00 19,345.00 5,655.00 77.4 3845 FINGERPRINTS/TAXICABS 460.00 .00 460.00 .00 100.0 3857 PKG PLAN APPLICATION 3,210.00 .00 3,210.00 .00 100.0 3858 TENANT REFUSE BILLING 150.00 .00 110.00 40.00 73.3 3859 REFUSE LIEN FEE 1,573.00 .00 17,441.89 15,868.89- 999.9+ 3862 ALARM PERMIT FEE 2,000.00 139.00 1,372.00 628.00 68.6 3863 FALSE ALARM FEE 1,000.00 117.00 1,389.00 389.00- 138.9 3864 C.U.P./FENCES/WALLS 217.00 .00 .00 217.00 0.0 3866 NONCONFORMING REMODELS 7,610.00 779.00 6,232.00 1,378.00 81.9 3867 PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 36,400.00 6,655.00 31,696.00 4,704.00 87.1 3868 PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 27,896.00 3,804.00 21,556.00 6,340.00 77.3 3869 2ND PARTY RESPONSE 100.00 .00 130.68 30.68- 130.7 3870 LEGAL DETERMINATION HEARING .00 .00 1,160.00 1,160.00- *** 3878 REINSPECTION FEE 1,000.00 .00 607.00 393.00 60.7 3881 ROLLR HOCKEY RINK RENT INS 325.00 425.00- 140.00- 465.00 43.1- 3882 SPEC EVENT SECURITY/FIRE 500.00 .00 193.00 307.00 38.6 3883 FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION 522.00 .00 522.00 .00 100.0 3884 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1,198.00 .00 1,198.00 .00 100.0 3886 TEXT AMENDMENT PRIVATE 517.00 .00 517.00 .00 100.0 3888 PLANNING COMM APPEALS 1,500.00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 3890 300'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 2,300.00 .00 2,424.00 124.00- 105.4 3893 CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 240,000.00 15,288.25 187,547.98 52,452.02 78.1 3894 OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS 40,000.00 2,600.00 30,723.65 9,276.35 76.8 3896 MAILING FEE 7.00 .00 6.50 .50 92.9 3897 ADMIN FEE, INS CERTIF 11.00 962.61 1,383.16 1,372.16- 999.9+ 3898 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION .00 372.00 372.00 372.00- *** 3899 C.U.P. MINOR AMEND. 105.00 .00 .00 105.00 0.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 1,015,673.00 94,506.11 777,998.26 237,674.74 76.6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 1,000.00 .00 988.20 11.80 98.8 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 1,254.00 .00 6,426.70 5,172.70- 512.5 3903 CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 1,020,670.00 8,380.00 1,041,850.00 21,180.00- 102.1 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 4,911.00 14.00 15,534.89 10,623.89- 316.3 3909 LATE FEE .00 .00 .53 .53- *** 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND 55,500.00 .00 .00 55,500.00 0.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1,108,944.00 92,174.92 832,419.28 276,524.72 75.1 3956 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN .00 .00 4,938.77 4,938.77- *** OTHER REVENUE 2,192,279.00 100,568.92 1,902,158.37 290,120.63 86.8 REVENUE CONTROL 15,261,602.00 832,643.29 10,895,199.42 4,366,402.58 71.4 GENERAL FUND 15,261,602.00 832,643.29 10,895,199.42 4,366,402.58 71.4 REVPRIN2. 05/04/00 12:33:43 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 4 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 444,029.00 .00 275,232.55 168,796.45 62.0 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 12,000.00 118.94- 11,543.60 456.40 96.2 3105 ASSESSMENT REBATES 4,000.00- 492.20- 1,993.41- 2,006.59- 49.8 TAXES 452,029.00 611.14- 284,782.74 167,246.26 63.0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 38,175.00 1,821.39 18,081.33 20,093.67 47.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 87.00 33.43 143.22 56.22- 164.6 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 514.00- 41.43- 435.16- 78.84- 84.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 37,748.00 1,813.39 17,789.39 19,958.61 47.1 REVENUE CONTROL 489,777.00 1,202.25 302,572.13 187,204.87 61.8 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 489,777.00 1,202.25 302,572.13 187,204.87 61.8 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 5 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 47,180.00 1,463.65 19,706.70 27,473.30 41.8 3413 PARKING LOT LEASE 114,608.00 1,052.00 112,591.22 2,016.78 98.2 3420 OTHER INTEREST INCOME 18,040.00 1,465.33 13,460.80 4,579.20 74.6 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 109.00 26.86 141.19 32.19- 129.5 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 634.00- 33.29- 482.31- 151.69- 76.1 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 179,303.00 3,974.55 145,417.60 33,885.40 81.1 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 5,000.00 .00 2,000.00 3,000.00 40.0 3844 LOT A REVENUE 114,425.00 15,871.70 21,428.60 92,996.40 18.7 3846 NO PIER PKG STRUCTURE REVENUE 259,620.00 32,931.50 67,628.00 191,992.00 26.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 379,045.00 48,803.20 91,056.60 287,988.40 24.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB/PREV YEARS REVENUE CONTROL DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 200.00 50.00 600.00 400.00- 300.0 558,548.00 52,827.75 237,074.20 321,473.80 42.4 558,548.00 52,827.75 237,074.20 321,473.80 42.4 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 110 PARKING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 6 BALANCE % COL 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3302 COURT FINES/PARKING 814,240.00 26,428.25 523,215.95 291,024.05 64.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 6,747.00 311.37 2,084.55 4,662.45 30.9 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 16.00 5.72 29.93 13.93- 187.1 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 91.00- 7.08- 83.04- 7.96- 91.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,672.00 310.01 2,031.44 4,640.56 30.4 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 PARKING METERS 740,000.00 54,304.74 534,195.99 205,804.01 72.2 3843 PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 250,000.00 105,535.00 219,569.00 30,431.00 87.8 3844 DAILY PARKING PERMITS 700.00 48.00 510.00 190.00 72.9 3848 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 500.00 32.00 268.00 232.00 53.6 3849 GUEST PERMITS 1,200.00 96.00 1,120.00 80.00 93.3 3850 CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 4,000.00 504.00 3,447.00 553.00 86.2 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 996,400.00 160,519.74 759,109.99 237,290.01 76.2 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN 1,281.00 .00 1,281.00 .00 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 1,818,593.00 187,258.00 1,285,638.38 532,954.62 70.7 PARKING FUND 1,818,593.00 187,258.00 1,285,638.38 532,954.62 70.7 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 7 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 4,770.00 251.26 2,525.75 2,244.25 53.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 11.00 4.62 19.97 8.97- 181.5 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 64.00- 5.72- 61.26- 2.74- 95.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,717.00 250.16 2,484.46 2,232.54 52.7 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 76,484.00 7,938.82 49,595.23 26,888.77 64.8 3502 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 143,702.00 14,871.80 104,331.68 39,370.32 72.6 3503 SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 .00 100.0 3512 SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 115,450.00 12,269.96 78,716.59 36,733.41 68.2 3522 TDA ARTICLE 3/LOCAL 15,779.00 .00 .00 15,779.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 355,415.00 35,080.58 236,643.50 118,771.50 66.6 REVENUE CONTROL 360,132.00 35,330.74 239,127.96 121,004.04 66.4 STATE GAS TAX FUND 360,132.00 35,330.74 239,127.96 121,004.04 66.4 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 117 AB939 FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 8 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 15,391.00 733.63 7,137.46 8,253.54 46.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 36.00 13.46 55.92 19.92- 155.3 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 207.00- 16.69- 173.18- 33.82- 83.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 15,220.00 730.40 7,020.20 8,199.80 46.1 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3860 AB939 SURCHARGE 61,797.00 .00 30,672.62 31,124.38 49.6 REVENUE CONTROL 77,017.00 730.40 37,692.82 39,324.18 48.9 AB939 FUND 77,017.00 730.40 37,692.82 39,324.18 48.9 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 9 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 2,633.00 43.97 617.70 2,015.30 23.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 6.00 .81 8.04 2.04- 134.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 35.00- 1.00- 25.45- 9.55- 72.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,604.00 43.78 600.29 2,003.71 23.1 REVENUE CONTROL 2,604.00 43.78 600.29 2,003.71 23.1 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 2,604.00 43.78 600.29 2,003.71 23.1 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 10 BALANCE % COL 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3606 LA CO PRKS/PIER RENOVATION 969,664.00 .00 40,579.00 929,085.00 4.2 3608 MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION 19,097.00 .00 .00 19,097.00 0.0 3610 CO. LIFEGUARD AGREEMENT 942,939.00 .00 347,530.40 595,408.60 36.9 3611 PROP A DISCRETIONARY FUNDS 102,285.00 .00 .00 102,285.00 0.0 3615 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 389,414.00 .00 .00 389,414.00 0.0 3616 CDS CLARIFIER UNIT REIMB 367,761.00 .00 .00 367,761.00 0.0 3617 CATCH BASIN INSERTS REIMB 56,250.00 .00 .00 56,250.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 2,847,410.00 .00 388,109.40 2,459,300.60 13.6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB-PREVIOUS YEARS 22,250.00 .00 .00 22,250.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 2,869,660.00 .00 388,109.40 2,481,550.60 13.5 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 2,869,660.00 .00 388,109.40 2,481,550.60 13.5 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3116 PARK REC FACILITY TAX PAGE 11 BALANCE % COL 21,000.00 .00 7,000.00 14,000.00 33.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 36,989.00 1,910.54 18,306.25 18,682.75 49.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 85.00 35.06 137.87 52.87- 162.2 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 497.00- 43.46- 423.37- 73.63- 85.2 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 36,577.00 1,902.14 18,020.75 18,556.25 49.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 155,160.00 3,396.00 120,212.00 34,948.00 77.5 REVENUE CONTROL PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 212,737.00 5,298.14 145,232.75 67,504.25 68.3 212,737.00 5,298.14 145,232.75 67,504.25 68.3 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 12 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 32,084.00 1,134.15 12,961.31 19,122.69 40.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 74.00 20.82 110.74 36.74- 149.6 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 431.00- 25.80- 347.19- 83.81- 80.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 31,727.00 1,129.17 12,724.86 19,002.14 40.1 REVENUE CONTROL 31,727.00 1,129.17 12,724.86 19,002.14 40.1 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 31,727.00 1,129.17 12,724.86 19,002.14 40.1 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 13 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 9,228.00 430.75 4,370.69 4,857.31 47.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 21.00 7.90 33.16 12.16- 157.9 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 124.00- 9.79- 103.36- 20.64- 83.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,125.00 428.86 4,300.49 4,824.51 47.1 REVENUE CONTROL 9,125.00 428.86 4,300.49 4,824.51 47.1 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 9,125.00 428.86 4,300.49 4,824.51 47.1 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3925 SPEC ASSESSMENT ADMIN FEES REVENUE CONTROL MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND PAGE 14 BALANCE % COL .00 12.50 12.50 12.50- 4,378.00 .00 4,377.03 .97 100.0 4,378.00 12.50 4,389.53 11.53- 100.3 4,378.00 12.50 4,389.53 11.53- 100.3 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3925 SPEC ASSESSMENT ADMIN FEES REVENUE CONTROL LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND PAGE 15 BALANCE % COL .00 15.72 15.72 15.72- 5,533.00 .00 5,532.08 .92 100.0 5,533.00 15.72 5,547.80 14.80- 100.3 5,533.00 15.72 5,547.80 14.80- 100.3 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 16 BALANCE % COL 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3720 AMER DISAB ACT 296,856.00 624.00 624.00 296,232.00 0.2 REVENUE CONTROL 296,856.00 624.00 624.00 296,232.00 0.2 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 296,856.00 624.00 624.00 296,232.00 0.2 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 17 BALANCE 7 COL 3100 TAXES 3117 PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 220,200.00 .00 148,972.72 71,227.28 67.7 3121 SUBREGIONAL INCENTIVES 29,000.00 .00 .00 29,000.00 0.0 TAXES 249,200.00 .00 148,972.72 100,227.28 59.8 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 4,479.00 94.79 1,548.82 2,930.18 34.6 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 10.00 1.74 12.28 2.28- 122.8 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 60.00- 2.16- 42.62- 17.38- 71.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,429.00 94.37 1,518.48 2,910.52 34.3 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3854 FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11,500.00 .00 5,983.24 5,516.76 52.0 3855 BUS PASSES 1,200.00 70.40 633.60 566.40 52.8 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 12,700.00 70.40 6,616.84 6,083.16 52.1 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3916 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 11,550.00 .00 .00 11,550.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 277,879.00 164.77 157,108.04 120,770.96 56.5 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 277,879.00 164.77 157,108.04 120,770.96 56.5 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3118 PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS PAGE 18 BALANCE % COL 183,620.00 17,292.55 123,979.70 59,640.30 67.5 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 45,723.00 2,327.57 22,400.07 23,322.93 49.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 106.00 42.72 168.96 62.96- 159.4 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 615.00- 52.94- 520.58- 94.42- 84.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 45,214.00 2,317.35 22,048.45 23,165.55 48.8 REVENUE CONTROL 228,834.00 19,609.90 146,028.15 82,805.85 63.8 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 228,834.00 19,609.90 146,028.15 82,805.85 63.8 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 150 GRANTS FUND . • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 19 BALANCE % COL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3545 COASTAL CONSERVANCY GRANT 100,000.00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 3546 COASTAL AUTHORITY GRANT 23,166.00 14,625.23 14,625.23 8,540.77 63.1 3550 CA WASTE OIL RECYCLING GRANT 8,959.00 .00 8,958.50 .50 100.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 132,125.00 14,625.23 23,583.73 108,541.27 17.8 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3735 FEMA/16TH ST STORM DRAIN IMP 1,287,800.00 .00 .00 1,287,800.00 0.0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3847 PARKING STRUCTURE EASEMENT 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3930 BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADV GRANT 1,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 .00 100.0 20,000.00 .00 .00 20,000.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 2,539,925.00 1,114,625.23 1,123,583.73 1,416,341.27 44.2 GRANTS FUND 2,539,925.00 1,114,625.23 1,123,583.73 1,416,341.27 44.2 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 20 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 302.00 2.02 96.01 205.99 31.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 1.00 .04 .93 .07 93.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 4.00- .05- 3.26- .74- 81.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 299.00 2.01 93.68 205.32 31.3 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3538 AQMD EMISSION CTL AB276 20,405.00 4,845.46 10,388.94 10,016.06 50.9 3551 MSRC DISCR MATCHING FUNDS .00 10,157.00 10,157.00 10,157.00- *** INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 20,405.00 15,002.46 20,545.94 140.94- 100.7 REVENUE CONTROL 20,704.00 15,004.47 20,639.62 64.38 99.7 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 20,704.00 15,004.47 20,639.62 64.38 99.7 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 21 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3135 C.O.P.S. ALLOCATION 43,080.00 .00 43,079.59 .41 100.0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 2,929.00 63.73 1,345.30 1,583.70 45.9 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 7.00 1.17 7.27 .27- 103.9 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 39.00- 1.45- 28.43- 10.57- 72.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,897.00 63.45 1,324.14 1,572.86 45.7 REVENUE CONTROL 45,977.00 63.45 44,403.73 1,573.27 96.6 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 45,977.00 63.45 44,403.73 1,573.27 96.6 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 22 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3460 UNREALIZED GAIN(LOSS) ON INV .00 .00 10.24 10.24- 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM .00 .00 .80- .80 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY .00 .00 9.44 9.44 - REVENUE CONTROL .00 .00 9.44 9.44 - CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND .00 .00 9.44 9.44- *** *** *** *** * * * REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 23 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 146,898.00 7,167.45 70,496.76 76,401.24 48.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 339.00 131.54 535.55 196.55- 158.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 1,975.00- 163.03- 1,653.44- 321.56- 83.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 145,262.00 7,135.96 69,378.87 75,883.13 47.8 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANCE 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00 0.0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 35,556.00 576.18 44,883.95 9,327.95- 126.2 3829 SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 8,000.00 1,218.00 8,412.00 412.00- 105.2 3832 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 5,000.00 870.00 4,516.00 484.00 90.3 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 48,556.00 2,664.18 57,811.95 9,255.95- 119.1 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 840.00 .00 840.00 .00 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 700,000.00 58,333.33 524,999.73 175,000.27 75.0 OTHER REVENUE 700,840.00 58,333.33 525,839.73 175,000.27 75.0 REVENUE CONTROL 899,658.00 68,133.47 653,030.55 246,627.45 72.6 SEWER FUND 899,658.00 68,133.47 653,030.55 246,627.45 72.6 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 3304 FINES & FORFEITURES FORFEITED FUNDS PAGE 24 BALANCE % COL 10,000.00 3,567.07 5,685.98 4,314.02 56.9 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 8,964.00 362.18 4,071.21 4,892.79 45.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 21.00 6.65 30.36 9.36- 144.6 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 120.00- 8.24- 97.55- 22.45- 81.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 8,865.00 360.59 4,004.02 4,860.98 45.2 REVENUE CONTROL 18,865.00 3,927.66 9,690.00 9,175.00 51.4 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 18,865.00 3,927.66 9,690.00 9,175.00 51.4 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 25 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 21,958.00 1,121.23 10,704.70 11,253.30 48.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 51.00 20.57 82.04 31.04- 160.9 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 295.00- 25.50- 251.56- 43.44- 85.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 21,714.00 1,116.30 10,535.18 11,178.82 48.5 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 FIRE FLOW FEE 110,000.00 22,238.00 106,798.50 3,201.50 97.1 REVENUE CONTROL 131,714.00 23,354.30 117,333.68 14,380.32 89.1 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 131,714.00 23,354.30 117,333.68 14,380.32 89.1 • REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 26 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 30,680.00 2,283.20 21,320.87 9,359.13 69.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 71.00 41.90 135.91 64.91- 191.4 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 412.00- 51.93- 410.02- 1.98- 99.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 30,339.00 2,273.17 21,046.76 9,292.24 69.4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 492,460.00 41,038.33 173,114.73 319,345.27 35.2 REVENUE CONTROL 522,799.00 . 43,311.50 194,161.49 328,637.51 37.1 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT FUND 522,799.00 43,311.50 194,161.49 328,637.51 37.1 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR). ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 27 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 4,387.00 162.53 1,863.71 2,523.29 42.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 10.00 2.99 14.65 4.65- 146.5 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 59.00- 3.70- 47.10- 11.90- 79.8 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,338.00 161.82 1,831.26 2,506.74 42.2 REVENUE CONTROL 4,338.00 161.82 1,831.26 2,506.74 42.2 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 4,338.00 161.82 1,831.26 2,506.74 42.2 REVPRIN2 05/04/00' 12:33:43 307 MYRTLE. UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 28 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 55,494.00 3,132.61 33,840.19 21,653.81 61.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 128.00 57.49 130.32 2.32- 101.8 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 746.00- 71.25- 149.51- 596.49- 20.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 54,876.00 3,118.85 33,821.00 21,055.00 61.6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3936 CONTRIB FROM PROPERTY OWNERS 1,066,385.00 .00 1,066,385.36 3940 CASH PMTS/UTIL UNDERGROUNDING 449,359.00 .00 449,358.97 OTHER REVENUE 1,515,744.00 .00 1,515,744.33 REVENUE CONTROL 1,570,620.00 3,118.85 1,549,565.33 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 1,570,620.00 3,118.85 1,549,565.33 .36- 100.0 .03 100.0 .33- 100.0 21,054.67 98.7 21,054.67 98.7 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 29 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 61,074.00 2,377.99 32,444.04 28,629.96 53.1 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 141.00 43.64 93.82 47.18 66.5 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 821.00- 54.09- 103.98- 717.02- 12.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 60,394.00 2,367.54 32,433.88 27,960.12 53.7 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3936 CONTRIB FROM PROPERTY OWNERS 1,218,681.00 .00 1,218,681.27 .27- 100.0 3940 CASH PMTS/UTIL UNDERGROUNDING 457,257.00 .00 457,257.06 .06- 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 8,861.00 .00 8,860.86 .14 100.0 OTHER REVENUE 1,684,799.00 .00 1,684,799.19 .19- 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 1,745,193.00 2,367.54 1,717,233.07 27,959.93 98.4 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 1,745,193.00 2,367.54 1,717,233.07 27,959.93 98.4 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 610 LWR PIER DIST REDEMPTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 30 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 158.00 29.86 194.71 36.71- 123.2 REVENUE CONTROL 158.00 29.86 194.71 36.71- 123.2 LWR PIER DIST REDEMPTION FUND 158.00 29.86 194.71 36.71- 123.2 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 31 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 632.00 180.68 1,043.38 411.38- 165.1 REVENUE CONTROL 632.00 180.68 1,043.38 411.38- 165.1 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND 632.00 180.68 1,043.38 411.38- 165.1 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 32 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 525.00 114.14 832.52 307.52-158.6 REVENUE CONTROL 525.00 114.14 832.52 307.52- 158.6 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND 525.00 114.14 832.52 307.52- 158.6 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 705 INSURANCE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3880 INSURANCE SERVICE CHARGES PAGE 33 BALANCE % COL 1,075,632.00 .00 710,408.00 365,224.00 66.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 3,451.00 .00 3,450.95 .05 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 100,000.00 8,333.33 24,999.99 75,000.01 25.0 OTHER REVENUE 103,451.00 8,333.33 28,450.94 75,000.06 27.5 REVENUE CONTROL 1,179,083.00 8,333.33 738,858.94 440,224.06 62.7 INSURANCE FUND 1,179,083.00 8,333.33 738,858.94 440,224.06 62.7 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3889 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES PAGE 34 BALANCE % COL 675,243.00 56,271.00 506,439.00 168,804.00 75.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROPERTY 16,850.00 .00 8,850.00 8,000.00 52.5 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN39,773.00 2,915.96 31,024.64 8,748.36 78.0 OTHER REVENUE 56,623.00 2,915.96 39,874.64 16,748.36 70.4 REVENUE CONTROL 731,866.00 59,186.96 546,313.64 185,552.36 74.6 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 731,866.00 59,186.96 546,313.64 185,552.36 74.6 REVPRIN2 05/04/00 12:33:43 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 35 BALANCE % COL. REVENUE CONTROL 31,917,059.00 2,479,232.53 20,580,695.31 11,336,363.69. 64.5 GRAND TOTALS 31,917,059.00 2,479,232.53 20,580,695.31 11,336,363.69 64.5 i • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1101 CITY COUNCIL 1101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 24,288.00 2,024.50 18,220.57 .00 6,067.43 75.0 1101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 522.00 .00 .00 .00 522.00 0.0 1101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 39,000.00 3,250.00 29,555.52 .00 9,444.48 75.8 1101-4180 RETIREMENT 2,898.00 241.56 2,183.81 .00 714.19 75.4 1101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 37,598.00 2,387.87 25,342.19 .00 12,255.81 67.4 1101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,401.00 116.76 1,055.37 .00 345.63 75.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 105,707.00 8,020.69 76,357.46 .00 29,349.54 72.2 1101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3,800.00 200.00 6,078.75 .00 2,278.75- 160.0 1101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1101-4304 TELEPHONE 400.00 .00 85.48 .00 314.52 21.4 1101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,000.00 382.94 4,586.21 .00 1,413.79 76.4 1101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 10,300.00 .00 9,157.00 .00 1,143.00 88.9 1101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 9,000.00 1,359.68 4,868.98 .00 4,131.02 54.1 1101-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 5,865.00 747.04- 4,686.18 .00 1,178.82 79.9 1101-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 31,434.00 2,619.00 23,571.00 .00 7,863.00 75.0 1101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 25,486.00 .00 16,992.00 .00 8,494.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 88,485.00 3,614.58 63,946.85 .00 24,538.15 72.3 CITY COUNCIL 197,992.00 11,835.27 146,383.06 .00 51,608.94 73.9 1121 CITY CLERK 1121-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1121-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 45,288.00 3,774.00 33,966.00 .00 11,322.00 75.0 1121-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,402.00 .00 1,524.12 .00 122.12- 108.7 1121-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 41,568.00 3,342.40 31,815.11 .00 9,752.89 76.5 1121-4180 RETIREMENT 5,089.00 424.02 3,816.18 .00 1,272.82 75.0 , 1121-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,242.00 497.08 4,511.44 .00 1,730.56 72.3 1121-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,515.00 103.19 975.93 .00 539.07 64.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 101,104.00 8,140.69 76,608.78 .00 24,495.22 75.8 1121-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1121-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 13,350.00 1,326.06 4,044.94 1,258.41 8,046.65 39.7 1121-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 50,000.00 26,023.74 27,256.92 .00 22,743.08 54.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 63,350.00 27,349.80 31,301.86 1,258.41 30,789.73 51.4 1121-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1121-4304 TELEPHONE 690.00 15.55 189.53 .00 500.47 27.5 1121-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,500.00 300.51 4,166.44 .00 333.56 92.6 1121-4315 MEMBERSHIP 325.00 .00 270.00 .00 55.00 83.1 1121-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,700.00 .00 1,106.90 .00 1,593.10 41.0 1121-4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 9,950.00 .00 4,432.40 .00 5,517.60 44.5 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1121-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 5,688.00 474.00 4,266.00 .00 1,422.00 75.0 1121-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 3,366.00 .00 2,240.00 .00 1,126.00 66.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 27,219.00 790.06 16,671.27 .00 10,547.73 61.2 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 1121-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 2,556.00 .00 .00 .00 2,556.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4,056.00 .00 .00 .00 4,056.00 0.0 CITY CLERK 195,729.00 36,280.55 124,581.91 1,258.41 69,888.68 64.3 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 1131-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1131-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 210,000.00 19,372.79 63,726.08 .00 146,273.92 30.3 1131-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1131-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 3.88 50.76 .00 249.24 16.9 1131-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 100.00 .00 38.31 .00 61.69 38.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 400.00 3.88 89.07 .00 310.93 22.3 CITY ATTORNEY 210,400.00 19,376.67 63,815.15 .00 146,584.85 30.3 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 1132-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1132-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,975.00 235.10 2,140.43 .00 834.57 71.9 1132-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1132-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 90,840.00 6,320.00 58,162.45 850.00 31,827.55 65.0 1132-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1132-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 7.77 71.92 .00 228.08 24.0 1132-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 520.00 .00 .00 .00 520.00 0.0 1132-4315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 1132-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 400.00 .00 130.00 .00 270.00 32.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,320.00 7.77 201.92 .00 1,118.08 15.3 CITY PROSECUTOR 95,135.00 6,562.87 60,504.80 850.00 33,780.20 64.5 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 20,437.00 1,703.10 15,326.73 .00 5,110.27 75.0 1141-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 755.00 .00 .00 .00 755.00 0.0 1141-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,464.00 1,325.50 11,929.50 .00 4,534.50 72.5 1141-4180 RETIREMENT 2,764.00 226.85 2,041.60 .00 722.40 73.9 1141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,316.00 614.55 5,411.08 .00 1,904.92 74.0 1141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 535.00 43.91 395.67 .00 139.33 74.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 48,271.00 3,913.91 35,104.58 .00 13,166.42 72.7 1141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3,500.00 849.59 3,519.88 .00 19.88- 100.6 1141-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1141-4304 TELEPHONE 745.00 62.19 496.57 .00 248.43 66.7 1141-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,400.00 140.22 1,268.15 .00 131.85 90.6 1141-4315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 .00 100.00 .00 .00 100.0 1141-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,875.00 56.36 381.36 .00 1,493.64 20.3 1141-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 2,994.00 249.00 2,241.00 .00 753.00 74.8 1141-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,833.00 .00 1,224.00 .00 609.00 66.8 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8,947.00 507.77 5,711.08 .00 3,235.92 63.8 CITY TREASURER 60,718.00 5,271.27 44,335.54 .00 16,382.46 73.0 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1201 CITY MANAGER 1201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 148,782.00 13,684.19 110,130.30 .00 38,651.70 74.0 1201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 10,037.00 .00 .00 .00 10,037.00 0.0 1201-4180 RETIREMENT 10,726.00 937.32 7,460.21 .00 3,265.79 69.6 1201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 18,260.00 1,463.86 13,240.74 .00 5,019.26 72.5 1201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,035.00 188.19 1,516.61 .00 518.39 74.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 189,840.00 16,273.56 132,347.86 .00 57,492.14 69.7 1201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE = 500.00 2.25 171.18 .00 328.82 34.2 1201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1201-4304 TELEPHONE 1,000.00 66.08 524.52 .00 475.48 52.5 1201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,500.00 118.26 637.43 .00 862.57 42.5 1201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,400.00 .00 1,012.00 .00 388.00 72.3 1201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 4,400.00 34.00 4,001.61 .00 398.39 90.9 1201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 28,590.00 2,382.00 21,438.00 .00 7,152.00 75.0 1201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,657.00 .00 4,440.00 .00 2,217.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 43,547.00 2,600.34 32,053.56 .00 11,493.44 73.6 1201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 500.00 .00 216.49 .00 283.51 43.3 CITY MANAGER 234,387.00 18,876.15 164,789.09 .00 69,597.91 70.3 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 272,667.00 21,809.85 202,989.63 .00 69,677.37 74.4 1202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 400.00 .00 208.94 .00 191.06 52.2 1202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 18,997.00 1,290.96 13,616.59 .00 5,380.41 71.7 1202-4180 RETIREMENT 20,156.00 1,611.33 15,003.73 .00 5,152.27 74.4 1202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 28,144.00 2,254.03 20,398.01 .00 7,745.99 72.5 1202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,938.00 163.18 1,456.47 .00 481.53 75.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 342,302.00 27,129.35 253,673.37 .00 88,628.63 74.1 1202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 46,367.00 1,250.00 38,367.85 5,642.87 2,356.28 94.9 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1202-4304 TELEPHONE 2,700.00 151.59 1,350.71 .00 1,349.29 50.0 1202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,325.00 618.41 6,950.91 .00 1,374.09 83.5 1202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 350.00 .00 325.00 .00 25.00 92.9 1202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,858.00 267.14 3,573.13 .00 2,284.87 61.0 1202-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 15,267.00 1,272.00 11,448.00 .00 3,819.00 75.0 1202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 5,317.00 443.00 3,987.00 .00 1,330.00 75.0 1202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,316.00 .00 7,544.00 .00 3,772.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 49,133.00 2,752.14 35,178.75 .00 13,954.25 71.6 1202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 312.00 .00 311.76 .00 .24 99.9 1202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 5,395.00 .00 .00 .00 5,395.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 5,707.00 .00 311.76 .00 5,395.24 5.5 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 443,509.00 31,131.49 327,531.73 5,642.87 110,334.40 75.1 1203 PERSONNEL 1203-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1203-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 68,057.00 5,082.51 49,592.58 .00 18,464.42 72.9 1203-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,184.00 .00 .00 .00 4,184.00 0.0 1203-4180 RETIREMENT 4,940.00 367.58 3,596.59 .00 1,343.41 72.8 1203-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 16,619.00 4,341.54 15,815.80 .00 803.20 95.2 1203-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 671.00 76.56 745.67 .00 74.67- 111.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 94,471.00 9,868.19 69,750.64 .00 24,720.36 73.8 1203-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1203-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 31,800.00 5,222.72 21,218.04 .00 10,581.96 66.7 1203-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 33,300.00 5,222.72 21,218.04 .00 12,081.96 63.7 1203-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1203-4304 TELEPHONE 1,260.00 97.18 875.56 .00 384.44 69.5 1203-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,100.00 211.87 4,149.67 .00 49.67- 101.2 1203-4315 MEMBERSHIP 890.00 .00 757.00 .00 133.00 85.1 1203-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 12,950.00 .00 4,561.89 .00 8,388.11 35.2 1203-4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 19,295.00 2,000.00 6,974.70 .00 12,320.30 36.1 1203-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 5,388.00 449.00 4,041.00 .00 1,347.00 75.0 1203-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 4,191.00 .00 2,792.00 .00 1,399.00 66.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 48,074.00 2,758.05 24,151.82 .00 23,922.18 50.2 PERSONNEL 175,845.00 17,848.96 115,120.50 .00 60,724.50 65.5 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 1208-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1208-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 42,821.00 3,568.40 32,115.60 .00 10,705.40 75.0 1208-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 20.59 .00 20.59- *** 1208-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,099.00 205.87 4,249.56 .00 1,150.56- 137.1 1208-4180 RETIREMENT 3,207.00 267.26 2,405.34 .00 801.66 75.0 1208-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,630.00 210.78 1,909.69 .00 720.31 72.6 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1208-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 621.00 54.73 530.42 .00 90.58 85.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 52,378.00 4,307.04 41,231.20 .00 11,146.80 78.7 1208-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1208-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 10,177.00 .00 9,809.47 .00 367.53 96.4 1208-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1208-4304 TELEPHONE 315.00 7.77 76.57 .00 238.43 24.3 1208-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 33,665.00- 5,063.44- 33,838.41- .00 173.41 100.5 1208-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 3,443.00 287.00 2,583.00 .00 860.00 75.0 1208-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,655.00 .00 1,104.00 .00 551.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 28,252.00- 4,768.67- 30,074.84- .00 1,822.84 106.5 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 34,303.00 461.63- 20,965.83 .00 13,337.17 61.1 1214 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1214-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 30,016.00 .00 .00 .00 30,016.00 0.0 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 BUDGET TRANSFERS OUT 1,298,522.00 107,704.99 729,176.45 .00 569,345.55 56.2 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,963,543.00 233,943.08 2,142,882.51 .00 820,660.49 72.3 2101-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 53,345.00 4,073.60 39,004.27 .00 14,340.73 73.1 2101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 242,040.00 21,827.54 186,252.83 .00 55,787.17 77.0 2101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 310,360.00 13,177.66 282,254.87 .00 28,105.13 90.9 2101-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 14,000.00 1,081.52 6,446.10 .00 7,553.90 46.0 2101-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 8,200.00 467.82 5,035.41 .00 3,164.59 61.4 2101-4118 TRAINING OFFICER 9,000.00 216.21 2,437.52 .00 6,562.48 27.1 2101-4180 RETIREMENT 575,265.00 45,826.63 418,078.30 .00 157,186.70 72.7 2101-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 39,288.00 4,899.26 25,138.69 .00 14,149.31 64.0 2101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 237,453.00 17,962.39 163,615.51 .00 73,837.49 68.9 2101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 28,647.00 2,368.16 23,457.79 .00 5,189.21 81.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 4,481,141.00 345,843.87 3,294,603.80 .00 1,186,537.20 73.5 2101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 104,328.00 1,113.76 81,472.87 1,334.84 21,520.29 79.4 2101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,700.00 32.00 2,596.00 .00 3,104.00 45.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 110,028.00 1,145.76 84,068.87 1,334.84 24,624.29 77.6 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4304 TELEPHONE 46,725.00 4,007.10 32,313.81 .00 14,411.19 69.2 2101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 32,385.00 3,558.18 28,689.85 .00 3,695.15 88.6 2101-4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 6,300.00 .00 3,219.29 .00 3,080.71 51.1 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2101-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,500.00 .00 1,457.10 .00 2,042.90 41.6 2101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,600.00 214.01 2,535.77 178.59 1,885.64 59.0 2101-4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 10,000.00 639.50 5,005.60 .00 4,994.40 50.1 2101-4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 5,750.00 138.04 1,125.64 .00 4,624.36 19.6 2101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,260.00 .00 386.17 .00 873.83 30.6 2101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 19,510.00 471.05 9,113.79 .00 10,396.21 46.7 2101-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 222,848.00 18,571.00 167,139.00 .00 55,709.00 75.0 2101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 506,383.00 .00 337,592.00 .00 168,791.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 859,261.00 27,598.88 588,578.02 178.59 270,504.39 68.5 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 34,500.00 .00 .00 .00 34,500.00 0.0 POLICE 5,484,930.00 374,588.51 3,967,250.69 1,513.43 1,516,165.88 72.4 2102 CROSSING GUARD 2102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 55,373.00 5,025.50 28,068.64 27,304.36 .00 100.0 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,290,143.00 101,839.40 936,714.37 .00 353,428.63 72.6 2201-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 165,000.00 16,425.54 134,138.67 .00 30,861.33 81.3 2201-4108 FLSA OVERTIME 85,000.00 14,793.79 70,779.88 .00 14,220.12 83.3 2201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 158,786.00 8,167.93 80,647.71 .00 78,138.29 50.8 2201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 41,000.00 3,382.10 29,038.90 .00 11,961.10 70.8 2201-4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 9,200.00 .00 5,900.00 .00 3,300.00 64.1 2201-4180 RETIREMENT 240,269.00 20,234.54 172,752.13 .00 67,516.87 71.9 2201-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 9,120.00 920.20 8,936.54 .00 183.46 98.0 2201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 158,576.00 11,199.20 98,297.97 .00 60,278.03 62.0 2201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 15,144.00 1,374.10 12,482.86 .00 2,661.14 82.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,172,238.00 178,336.80 1,549,689.03 .00 622,548.97 71.3 2201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 35,626.00 1,252.50 30,814.56 3,750.00 1,061.44 97.0 2201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,460.00 .00 2,450.00 .00 10.00 99.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 38,086.00 1,252.50 33,264.56 3,750.00 1,071.44 97.2 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4304 TELEPHONE 7,900.00 698.06 6,041.51 .00 1,858.49 76.5 2201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,836.00 259.27 3,518.41 .00 1,317.59 72.8 2201-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 18,000.00 303.79 12,639.70 .00 5,360.30 70.2 2201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 2,350.00 468.97 1,483.92 .00 866.08 63.1 2201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 15,500.00 2,960.60 7,822.60 .00 7,677.40 50.5 2201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 5,389.00 449.00 4,041.00 .00 1,348.00 75.0 2201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 73,868.00 6,156.00 55,404.00 .00 18,464.00 75.0 2201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 163,780.00 .00 109,184.00 .00 54,596.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 291,623.00 11,295.69 200,135.14 .00 91,487.86 68.6 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 745.00 581.30 581.30 .00 163.70 78.0 2201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 6,000.00 .00 .00 .00 6,000.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 6,745.00 581.30 581.30 .00 6,163.70 8.6 FIRE 2,508,692.00 191,466.29 1,783,670.03 3,750.00 721,271.97 71.2 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3104 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 3104-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3104-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 126,008.00 9,187.17 84,851.10 .00 41,156.90 67.3 3104-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,500.00 488.98 1,957.50 .00 457.50- 130.5 3104-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,557.00 .00 2,985.30 .00 571.70 83.9 3104-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 21,000.00 912.25 13,448.00 .00 7,552.00 64.0 3104-4180 RETIREMENT 9,948.00 686.57 6,341.48 .00 3,606.52 63.7 3104-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 17,449.00 1,288.88 11,961.41 .00 5,487.59 68.6 3104-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,433.00 83.97 1,064.43 .00 368.57 74.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 180,895.00 12,647.82 122,609.22 .00 58,285.78 67.8 3104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 236,700.00 12,200.00 121,034.17 .00 115,665.83 51.1 3104-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 560.00 .00 358.20 .00 201.80 64.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 237,260.00 12,200.00 121,392.37 .00 115,867.63 51.2 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4303 UTILITIES 8,700.00 572.45 5,365.95 .00 3,334.05 61.7 3104-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 60,000.00 6,616.14 37,569.72 989.70 21,440.58 64.3 3104-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 15,231.00 1,269.00 11,421.00 .00 3,810.00 75.0 3104-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 102,883.00 .00 68,592.00 .00 34,291.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 186,814.00 8,457.59 122,948.67 989.70 62,875.63 66.3 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 6,000.00 308.51 1,162.60 .00 4,837.40 19.4 3104-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 6,000.00 .00 .00 .00 6,000.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 12,000.00 308.51 1,162.60 .00 10,837.40 9.7 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 616,969.00 33,613.92 368,112.86 989.70 247,866.44 59.8 4100 PLANNING 4101 PLANNING 4101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 200,805.00 17,268.53 149,444.67 .00 51,360.33 74.4 4101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,021.00 .00 7,745.69 .00 3,724.69- 192.6 4101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 8,432.00 265.13 6,518.90 .00 1,913.10 77.3 4101-4180 RETIREMENT 18,529.00 1,281.37 12,686.03 .00 5,842.97 68.5 4101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 27,225.00 1,763.92 15,914.28 .00 11,310.72 58.5 4101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,668.00 209.57 2,085.35 .00 582.65 78.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 261,680.00 20,788.52 194,394.92 .00 67,285.08 74.3 4101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND • . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 50,621.00 9,938.15 26,639.43 .00 23,981.57 52.6 4101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4101-4304 TELEPHONE 2,415.00 69.95 624.86 .00 1,790.14 25.9 4101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,665.00 1,180.78 5,717.23 .00 2,947.77 66.0 4101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,000.00 .00 938.00 .00 62.00 93.8 4101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,960.00 .00 1,008.90 .00 1,951.10 34.1 4101-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 7,634.00 636.00 5,724.00 .00 1,910.00 75.0 4101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 8,916.00 .00 5,944.00 .00 2,972.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 31,590.00 1,886.73 19,956.99 .00 11,633.01 63.2 4101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 335.00 334.48 334.48 .00 .52 99.8 PLANNING 344,226.00 32,947.88 241,325.82 .00 102,900.18 70.1 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 BUILDING 4201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 192,092.00 15,357.13 145,046.16 .00 47,045.84 75.5 4201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,964.00 .00 8,419.23 .00 4,455.23- 212.4 4201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 8,432.00 265.12 6,518.85 .00 1,913.15 77.3 4201-4180 RETIREMENT 14,230.00 1,137.13 10,908.30 .00 3,321.70 76.7 4201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 29,526.00 2,156.08 19,673.66 .00 9,852.34 66.6 4201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,807.00 244.59 2,437.81 .00 369.19 86.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 251,051.00 19,160.05 193,004.01 .00 58,046.99 76.9 4201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 247,040.00 20,686.75 92,087.52 6,265.66 148,686.82 39.8 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4304 TELEPHONE 4,410.00 195.04 1,630.62 .00 2,779.38 37.0 4201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,500.00 386.46 3,825.48 .00 2,674.52 58.9 4201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,480.00 75.00 720.00 .00 760.00 48.6 4201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,500.00 .00 1,738.86 .00 1,761.14 49.7 4201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 12,873.00 1,073.00 9,657.00 .00 3,216.00 75.0 4201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 9,512.00 793.00 7,137.00 .00 2,375.00 75.0 4201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 9,881.00 .00 6,584.00 .00 3,297.00 66.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 48,156.00 2,522.50 31,292.96 .00 16,863.04 65.0 BUILDING 546,247.00 42,369.30 316,384.49 6,265.66 223,596.85 59.1 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 199,699.00 13,610.14 138,328.25 .00 61,370.75 69.3 4202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,500.00 59.85 694.31 .00 805.69 46.3 4202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,141.00 .00 2,065.90 .00 4,075.10 33.6 4202-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4,968.00 .00 4,967.27 .00 .73 100.0 4202-4180 RETIREMENT 15,630.00 1,020.71 10,260.52 .00 5,369.48 65.6 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4202-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5,600.00 372.48 3,538.88 .00 2,061.12 63.2 4202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 26,164.00 1,421.72 14,714.64 .00 11,449.36 56.2 4202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,615.00 117.35 1,348.19 .00 1,266.81 51.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 262,317.00 16,602.25 175,917.96 .00 86,399.04 67.1 4202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 174,615.00 11,284.06 107,063.28 .00 67,551.72 61.3 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4303 UTILITIES 74,700.00 4,759.22 55,539.66 .00 19,160.34 74.4 4202-4304 TELEPHONE 9,500.00 1,331.77 8,431.36 .00 1,068.64 88.8 4202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11,500.00 708.21 6,036.31 .00 5,463.69 52.5 4202-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20,000.00 968.64 16,383.46 .00 3,616.54 81.9 4202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,010.00 .00 420.00 .00 590.00 41.6 4202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 10,900.00 623.00 5,876.52 .00 5,023.48 53.9 4202-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 16,465.00 1,372.00 12,348.00 .00 4,117.00 75.0 4202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 25,137.00 2,095.00 18,855.00 .00 6,282.00 75.0 4202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 29,929.00 .00 19,952.00 .00 9,977.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 199,141.00 11,857.84 143,842.31 .00 55,298.69 72.2 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 3,300.00 .00 1,196.33 .00 2,103.67 36.3 4202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 25,000.00 .00 .00 .00 25,000.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 28,300.00 .00 1,196.33 .00 27,103.67 4.2 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 664,373.00 39,744.15 428,019.88 .00 236,353.12 64.4 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 88,479.00 6,795.07 61,030.55 .00 27,448.45 69.0 4204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,000.00 620.15 2,006.00 .00 6.00- 100.3 4204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 962.00 .00 539.18 .00 422.82 56.0 4204-4180 RETIREMENT 6,667.00 513.00 4,617.01 .00 2,049.99 69.3 4204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12,223.00 797.48 7,239.23 .00 4,983.77 59.2 4204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 550.00 41.00 375.13 .00 174.87 68.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 110,881.00 8,766.70 75,807.10 .00 35,073.90 68.4 4204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 90,580.00 7,313.00 66,080.19 .00 24,499.81 73.0 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4303 UTILITIES 104,200.00 7,783.76 76,770.12 .00 27,429.88 73.7 4204-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 36,265.00 16,016.34 30,153.99 .00 6,111.01 83.1 4204-4321 BUILDING SFTY/SECURITY 3,000.00 162.28 2,262.31 .00 737.69 75.4 4204-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 8,831.00 736.00 6,624.00 215.00 1,992.00 77.4 4204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 30,962.00 .00 20,640.00 .00 10,322.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 183,258.00 24,698.38 136,450.42 215.00 46,592.58 74.6 4204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 • PAGE 10 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4204-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,550.00 .00 200.00 .00 1,350.00 12.9 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 386,269.00 40,778.08 278,537.71 215.00 107,516.29 72.2 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 235,943.00 14,919.00 162,344.41 .00 73,598.59 68.8 4601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4,000.00 .00 927.65 .00 3,072.35 23.2 4601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 14,167.00 .00 3,045.56 .00 11,121.44 21.5 4601-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 134,475.00 10,471.18 103,426.00 .00 31,049.00 76.9 4601-4180 RETIREMENT 17,492.00 1,144.06 12,447.04 .00 5,044.96 71.2 4601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 28,175.00 1,699.45 17,701.65 .00 10,473.35 62.8 4601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 6,649.00 412.48 5,176.02 .00 1,472.98 77.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 440,901.00 28,646.17 305,068.33 .00 135,832.67 69.2 4601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 52,556.00 2,837.89 46,389.90 .00 6,166.10 88.3 4601-4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 171,108.00 12,221.60 121,864.67 .00 49,243.33 71.2 CONTRACT SERVICES 223,664.00 15,059.49 168,254.57 .00 55,409.43 75.2 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4302 ADVERTISING 20,000.00 1,600.00 13,480.66 .00 6,519.34 67.4 4601-4304 TELEPHONE 6,227.00 691.87 4,843.95 .00 1,383.05 77.8 4601-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11,000.00 188.83 4,775.88 .00 6,224.12 43.4 4601-4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 20,200.00 706.29 12,161.63 270.63 7,767.74 61.5 4601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,303.00 15.00 1,010.47 .00 292.53 77.5 4601-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,100.00 .00 626.53 .00 473.47 57.0 4601-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,000.00 723.96 3,999.94 .00 1,000.06 80.0 4601-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 16,914.00 1,410.00 12,690.00 .00 4,224.00 75.0 4601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 8,587.00 716.00 6,444.00 .00 2,143.00 75.0 4601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 16,934.00 .00 11,288.00 .00 5,646.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 107,265.00 6,051.95 71,321.06 270.63 35,673.31 66.7 4601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4601-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 4,443.00 .00 1,424.64 .00 3,018.36 32.1 4601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 9,374.00 .00 3,869.37 .00 5,504.63 41.3 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 13,817.00 .00 5,294.01 .00 8,522.99 38.3 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 785,647.00 49,757.61 549,937.97 270.63 235,438.40 70.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 57,641.00 .00 5,299.81 .00 52,341.19 9.2 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 • PAGE 11 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8622-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 9,600.00 .00 4,787.10 .00 4,812.90 49.9 8622-4180 RETIREMENT 750.00 .00 358.57 .00 391.43 47.8 8622-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 480.00 .00 403.66 .00 76.34 84.1 8622-4189 FICA 300.00 .00 69.40 .00 230.60 23.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 11,130.00 .00 5,618.73 .00 5,511.27 50.5 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 323,858.00 .00 .00 .00 323,858.00 0.0 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 334,988.00 .00 5,618.73 .00 329,369.27 1.7 8630 PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III 8630-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8630-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,000,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL GENERAL FUND 15,761,911.00 1,064,717.83 9,769,430.69 48,060.06 5,944,420.25 62.3 15,761,911.00 1,064,717.83 9,769,430.69 48,060.06 5,944,420.25 62.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 12 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 18,322.00 1,526.82 13,741.38 .00 4,580.62 75.0 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 2601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 183,215.00 15,307.24 140,814.20 .00 42,400.80 76.9 2601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,900.00 150.65 1,565.43 .00 334.57 82.4 2601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 7,025.00 .00 513.00 .00 6,512.00 7.3 2601-4180 RETIREMENT 13,660.00 1,147.93 10,550.38 .00 3,109.62 77.2 2601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 17,706.00 1,756.48 15,809.71 .00 1,896.29 89.3 2601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,829.00 155.34 1,442.23 .00 386.77 78.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 225,335.00 18,517.64 170,694.95 .00 54,640.05 75.8 2601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 18,800.00 2,311.93 9,383.08 .00 9,416.92 49.9 2601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 20,500.00 .00 11,180.10 .00 9,319.90 54.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 39,300.00 2,311.93 20,563.18 .00 18,736.82 52.3 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4303 UTILITIES 118,200.00 10,277.70 91,978.58 .00 26,221.42 77.8 2601-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 .00 256.07 .00 43.93 85.4 2601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 21,100.00 3,220.97 15,476.54 .00 5,623.46 73.3 2601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 21,730.00 1,811.00 16,299.00 .00 5,431.00 75.0 2601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 28,373.00 .00 18,912.00 .00 9,461.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 189,703.00 15,309.67 142,922.19 .00 46,780.81 75.3 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 8,000.00 .00 .00 .00 8,000.00 0.0 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 462,338.00 36,139.24 334,180.32 .00 128,157.68 72.3 8100 STREET SAFETY 8153 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 14TH 8153-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8153-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 108,995.00 13,416.98 14,896.98 71,896.52 22,201.50 79.6 8156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 13TH 8156-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8156-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 108,951.00 5,659.58 7,139.58 79,653.92 22,157.50 79.7 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 49,600.00 .00 49,600.00 .00 .00 100.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA`BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8621-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,707.00 .00 2,421.05 .00 285.95 89.4 8621-4180 RETIREMENT 203.00 .00 184.33 .00 18.67 90.8 8621-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 254.00 .00 171.98 .00 82.02 67.7 8621-4189 FICA 39.00 .00 35.67 .00 3.33 91.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 3,203.00 .00 2,813.03 .00 389.97 87.8 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 96,797.00 .00 .00 .00 96,797.00 0.0 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 100,000.00 .00 2,813.03 .00 97,186.97 2.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 848,206.00 56,742.62 422,371.29 151,550.44 274,284.27 67.7 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 848,206.00 56,742.62 422,371.29 151,550.44 274,284.27 67.7 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 14 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 5,070.00 185.42 4,513.78 .00 556.22 89.0 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3301 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 3301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 22,249.00 1,731.90 16,824.08 .00 5,424.92 75.6 3301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 92.00 .00 .00 .00 92.00 0.0 3301-4180 RETIREMENT 1,635.00 127.09 1,236.40 .00 398.60 75.6 3301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,222.00 189.24 1,574.78 .00 647.22 70.9 3301-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 340.00 25.95 251.67 .00 88.33 74.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 26,538.00 2,074.18 19,886.93 .00 6,651.07 74.9 3301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 109,596.00 6,787.10 66,076.56 .00 43,519.44 60.3 3301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3301-4304 TELEPHONE 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 3301-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 25,855.00 158.00- 11,790.16 .00 14,064.84 45.6 3301-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,007.00 .00 672.00 .00 335.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 26,962.00 158.00- 12,462.16 .00 14,499.84 46.2 3301-4900 DEPRECIATION 3301-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 245.00 .00 .00 .00 245.00 0.0 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 163,341.00 8,703.28 98,425.65 .00 64,915.35 60.3 3304 NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE 3304-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3304-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 59,435.00 11,510.39 11,510.39 47,924.61 .00 100.0 3304-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3304-4303 UTILITIES 800.00 .00 292.18 .00 507.82 36.5 3304-4304 TELEPHONE 700.00 208.30 806.54 .00 106.54- 115.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,500.00 208.30 1,098.72 .00 401.28 73.2 3304-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3304-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,000.00 733.51 733.51 .00 266.49 73.4 NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE 61,935.00 12,452.20 13,342.62 47,924.61 667.77 98.9 3305 DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT A 3305-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3305-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 45,308.00 .00 .00 45,308.00 .00 100.0 3306 CO. SHARE PKG STRUCTURE REV. 3306-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3306-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 100,093.00 .00 .00 .00 100,093.00 0.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8158 DEVELOPERS REIMB/14TH ST, ETC. 8158-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8158-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 165,000.00 .00 24,000.00 .00 141,000.00 14.5 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 119,617.00 .00 4,450.00 .00 115,167.00 3.7 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 348,150.00 .00 312,606.71 34,632.60 910.69 99.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,008,514.00 21,340.90 457,338.76 127,865.21 423,310.03 58.0 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,008,514.00 21,340.90 457,338.76 127,865.21 423,310.03 58.0 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 110 PARKING FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1204 FINANCE CASHIER 1204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 192,444.00 16,057.81 141,345.15 .00 51,098.85 73.4 1204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 1204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,143.00 194.79 1,467.41 .00 4,675.59 23.9 1204-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 1204-4180 RETIREMENT 14,406.00 1,198.80 10,587.04 .00 3,818.96 73.5 1204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 19,478.00 1,628.38 14,478.19 .00 4,999.81 74.3 1204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,757.00 150.72 1,300.87 .00 456.13 74.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 234,728.00 19,230.50 169,178.66 .00 65,549.34 72.1 1204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 15,267.00 1,237.90 7,394.49 4,000.00 3,872.51 74.6 1204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1204-4304 TELEPHONE 2,518.00 126.58 1;075.64 .00 1,442.36 42.7 1204-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 24,301.00 4,552.87 15,316.55 .00 8,984.45 63.0 1204-4315 MEMBERSHIP 125.00 .00 50.00 .00 75.00 40.0 1204-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,328.00 50.00 435.48 .00 892.52 32.8 1204-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 19,384.00 1,615.00 14,535.00 .00 4,849.00 75.0 1204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,988.00 .00 4,656.00 .00 2,332.00 66.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 54,644.00 6,344.45 36,068.67 .00 18,575.33 66.0 1204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 FINANCE CASHIER 307,139.00 26,812.85 212,641.82 4,000.00 90,497.18 70.5 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 651,599.00 54,299.92 488,699.28 .00 162,899.72 75.0 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 506,540.00 42,288.95 372,835.78 .00 133,704.22 73.6 3302-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 8,000.00 .00 2,782.15 .00 5,217.85 34.8 3302-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 29,326.00 .00 12,184.39 .00 17,141.61 41.5 3302-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 10,600.00 109.48 6,817.26 .00 3,782.74 64.3 3302-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 3,800.00 320.80 2,426.53 .00 1,373.47 63.9 3302-4180 RETIREMENT 51,826.00 4,314.49 38,217.46 .00 13,608.54 73.7 3302-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,050.00 270.31 3,127.45 .00 922.55 77.2 3302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 49,338.00 4,164.54 35,735.48 .00 13,602.52 72.4 3302-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 6,296.00 264.58 2,526.21 .00 3,769.79 40.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 669,776.00 51,733.15 476,652.71 .00 193,123.29 71.2 3302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 110 PARKING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 9,138.00 322.50 4,144.23 .00 4,993.77 45.4 3302-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 1,500.00 42.20 552.47 .00 947.53 36.8 CONTRACT SERVICES 10,638.00 364.70 4,696.70 .00 5,941.30 44.2 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4304 TELEPHONE 3,000.00 274.10 2,193.00 .00 807.00 73.1 3302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,500.00 2,632.67 6,726.14 .00 2,773.86 70.8 3302-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1,600.00 .00 .00 .00 1,600.00 0.0 3302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,138.00 4,629.97 7,360.12 .00 4,777.88 60.6 3302-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 0.0 3302-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 6,800.00 .00 4,223.98 .00 2,576.02 62.1 3302-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 3,143.00 262.00 2,358.00 .00 785.00 75.0 3302-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 88,123.00 7,344.00 66,096.00 .00 22,027.00 75.0 3302-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 58,930.00 .00 39,288.00 .00 19,642.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 183,534.00 15,142.74 128,245.24 .00 55,288.76 69.9 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 400.00 .00 .00 .00 400.00 0.0 3302-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 900.00 .00 .00 .00 900.00 0.0 3302-4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS 5.00 .00 .00 .00 5.00 0.0 DEPRECIATION 1,305.00 .00 .00 .00 1,305.00 0.0 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 837.00 .00 .00 .00 837.00 0.0 3302-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 4,521.00 .00 3,010.72 .00 1,510.28 66.6 3302-5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 7,575.00 .00 .00 .00 7,575.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 12,933.00 .00 3,010.72 .00 9,922.28 23.3 COMMUNITY SERVICES 878,186.00 67,240.59 612,605.37 .00 265,580.63 69.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,836,924.00 148,353.36 1,313,946.47 4,000.00 518,977.53 71.7 PARKING FUND 1,836,924.00 148,353.36 1,313,946.47 4,000.00 518,977.53 71.7 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 18 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 340,988.00 28,415.67 255,741.03 .00 85,246.97 75.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8144 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 8144-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8144-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,206.00 .00 305.90 .00 900.10 25.4 8144-4180 RETIREMENT 90.00 .00 27.59 .00 62.41 30.7 8144-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 113.00 .00 .00 .00 113.00 0.0 8144-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 18.00 .00 5.35 .00 12.65 29.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,427.00 .00 338.84 .00 1,088.16 23.7 8144-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8144-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 13,573.00 .00 .00 .00 13,573.00 0.0 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 15,000.00 .00 338.84 .00 14,661.16 2.3 8153 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 14TH 8153-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8153-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,304.00 5,304.00 5,304.00 .00 .00 100.0 8156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 13TH 8156-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8156-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,304.00 5,304.00 5,304.00 .00 .00 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 366,596.00 39,023.67 266,687.87 .00 99,908.13 72.7 STATE GAS TAX FUND 366,596.00 39,023.67 266,687.87 .00 99,908.13 72.7 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 19 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 117 AB939 FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 5300 AB939 5301 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 5301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 5301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 19,759.00 1,420.06 12,162.30 .00 7,596.70 61.6 5301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 922.00 .00 673.53 .00 248.47 73.1 5301-4180 RETIREMENT 1,436.00 102.71 890.77 .00 545.23 62.0 5301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,076.00 164.75 1,503.17 .00 572.83 72.4 5301-4189 FICA 245.00 20.74 191.11 .00 53.89 78.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 24,438.00 1,708.26 15,420.88 .00 9,017.12 63.1 5301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 5301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 0.0 5301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5301-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 55,938.00 1,708.26 15,420.88 .00 40,517.12 27.6 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 55,938.00 1,708.26 15,420.88 .00 40,517.12 27.6 AB939 FUND 55,938.00 1,708.26 15,420.88 .00 40,517.12 27.6 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 20 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 502.00 .00 .00 .00 502.00 0.0 8141-4180 RETIREMENT 38.00 .00 .00 .00 38.00 0.0 8141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 47.00 .00 .00 .00 47.00 0.0 8141-4189 FICA 7.00 .00 .00 .00 7.00 0.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 594.00 .00 .00 .00 594.00 0.0 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 78,507.00 .00 70,581.76 .00 7,925.24 89.9 STREET REHAB 79,101.00 .00 70,581.76 .00 8,519.24 89.2 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 79,101.00 .00 70,581.76 .00 8,519.24 89.2 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 79,101.00 .00 70,581.76 .00 8,519.24 89.2 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 19,097.00 1,591.42 14,322.78 .00 4,774.22 75.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8144 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 8144-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8144-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 7,823.00 .00 5,925.52 .00 1,897.48 75.7 8144-4180 RETIREMENT 586.00 .00 450.72 .00 135.28 76.9 8144-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 734.00 .00 399.13 .00 334.87 54.4 8144-4189 FICA 113.00 .00 87.25 .00 25.75 77.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 9,256.00 .00 6,862.62 .00 2,393.38 74.1 8144-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8144-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 380,158.00 .00 20,327.75 10,339.05 349,491.20 8.1 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 389,414.00 .00 27,190.37 10,339.05 351,884.58 9.6 8300 STORM DRAIN 8305 INSTALL CDS CLARIFIER UNITS 8305-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8305-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 367,761.00 .00 .00 .00 367,761.00 0.0 8306 INSTALL CATCH BASIN INSERTS 8306-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8306-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 56,250.00 .00 .00 .00 56,250.00 0.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8621-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 18,108.00 .00 1,646.11 .00 16,461.89 9.1 8621-4180 RETIREMENT 1,356.00 .00 147.92 .00 1,208.08 10.9 8621-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,698.00 .00 102.27 .00 1,595.73 6.0 8621-4189 FICA 263.00 .00 28.64 .00 234.36 10.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 21,425.00 .00 1,924.94 .00 19,500.06 9.0 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,050,524.00 .00 42,456.23 82,500.00 925,567.77 11.9 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 1,071,949.00 .00 44,381.17 82,500.00 945,067.83 11.8 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 942,939.00 383.14 672,902.07 127,021.00 143,015.93 84.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,847,410.00 1,974.56 758,796.39 219,860.05 1,868,753.56 34.4 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 2,847,410.00 1,974.56 758,796.39 219,860.05 1,868,753.56 34.4 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8500 PARKS 8529 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 8529-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8529-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 119,660.00 .00 .00 .00 119,660.00 0.0 8530 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8530-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8530-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,413.00 .00 1,676.83 .00 3,736.17 31.0 8530-4180 RETIREMENT 405.00 .00 131.05 .00 273.95 32.4 8530-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 508.00 .00 148.20 .00 359.80 29.2 8530-4189 FICA 79.00 .00 25.37 .00 53.63 32.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,405.00 .00 1,981.45 .00 4,423.55 30.9 8530-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8530-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 263,859.00 6,500.84 8,737.84 .00 255,121.16 3.3 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS 270,264.00 6,500.84 10,719.29 .00 259,544.71 4.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8627 COMMUNITY CTR IMPROVEMENTS 8627-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8627-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,379.00 .00 2,529.70 .00 2,849.30 47.0 8627-4180 RETIREMENT 403.00 .00 205.80 .00 197.20 51.1 8627-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 505.00 .00 136.73 .00 368.27 27.1 8627-4189 FICA 78.00 .00 40.76 .00 37.24 52.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,365.00 .00 2,912.99 .00 3,452.01 45.8 8627-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8627-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 246,899.00 6,838.92 6,838.92 .00 240,060.08 2.8 8627-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 8627-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 17,000.00 9,141.00 16,945.00 .00 55.00 99.7 COMMUNITY CTR IMPROVEMENTS 270,264.00 15,979.92 26,696.91 .00 243,567.09 9.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 660,188.00 22,480.76 37,416.20 .00 622,771.80 5.7 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 660,188.00 22,480.76 37,416.20 .00 622,771.80 5.7 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 23 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8500 PARKS 8507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8507-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8507-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 4,188.00 .00 1,529.23 .00 2,658.77 36.5 8507-4180 RETIREMENT 314.00 .00 127.96 .00 186.04 40.8 8507-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 393.00 .00 85.60 .00 307.40 21.8 8507-4189 FICA 60.00 .00 24.76 .00 35.24 41.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 4,955.00 .00 1,767.55 .00 3,187.45 35.7 8507-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8507-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 354,939.00 .00 .00 .00 354,939.00 0.0 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 359,894.00 .00 1,767.55 .00 358,126.45 0.5 8526 COMMUNITY CTR TENNIS CENTER 8526-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8526-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 190,998.00 .00 187,660.00 2,572.75 765.25 99.6 8529 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 8529-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8529-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,287.00 .00 264.97 .00 5,022.03 5.0 8529-4180 RETIREMENT 396.00 .00 19.85 .00 376.15 5.0 8529-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 496.00 .00 .00 .00 496.00 0.0 8529-4189 FICA 76.00 .00 3.84 .00 72.16 5.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,255.00 .00 288.66 .00 5,966.34 4.6 8529-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8529-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 31,085.00 .00 .00 .00 31,085.00 0.0 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 37,340.00 .00 288.66 .00 37,051.34 0.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 588,232.00 .00 189,716.21 2,572.75 395,943.04 32.7 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 588,232.00 .00 189,716.21 2,572.75 395,943.04 32.7 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 134,821.00 .00 745.00 .00 134,076.00 0.6 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 134,821.00 .00 745.00 .00 134,076.00 0.6 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 134,821.00 .00 745.00 .00 134,076.00 0.6 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8100 STREET SAFETY 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 4,378.00 77.00 77.00 .00 4,301.00 1.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 4,378.00 77.00 77.00 .00 4,301.00 1.8 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 4,378.00 77.00 77.00 .00 4,301.00 1.8 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8100 STREET SAFETY 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,533.00 12.00 12.00 .00 5,521.00 0.2 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 5,533.00 12.00 12.00 .00 5,521.00 0.2 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 5,533.00 12.00 12.00 .00 5,521.00 0.2 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8622-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,100.00 86.95 793.44 .00 4,306.56 15.6 8622-4180 RETIREMENT 382.00 6.51 69.58 .00 312.42 18.2 8622-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 465.00 14.63 52.37 .00 412.63 11.3 8622-4189 FICA 29.00 .00 .00 .00 29.00 0.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 5,976.00 108.09 915.39 .00 5,060.61 15.3 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 149,321.00 .00 .00 .00 149,321.00 0.0 8622-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8622-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 100.00 .00 39.68 .00 60.32 39.7 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 155,397.00 108.09 955.07 .00 154,441.93 0.6 8623 99-00 ALLOCATION 8623-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8623-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 141,459.00 .00 .00 .00 141,459.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 296,856.00 108.09 955.07 .00 295,900.93 0.3 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 296,856.00 108.09 955.07 .00 295,900.93 0.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 28 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3400 PUBLIC TRANSIT 3401 DIAL A RIDE 3401-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 37,000.00 3,040.16 27,200.35 .00 9,799.65 73.5 3401-4180 RETIREMENT .00 227.70 339.61 .00 339.61- *** 3401-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 285.83 553.65 .00 553.65- *** 3401-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS .00 33.02 49.36 .00 49.36- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 37,000.00 3,586.71 28,142.97 .00 8,857.03 76.1 3401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3401-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 77,627.00 9,991.41 72,580.31 .00 5,046.69 93.5 3401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 189,671.00 .00 90,194.21 .00 99,476.79 47.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 267,298.00 9,991.41 162,774.52 .00 104,523.48 60.9 3401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3401-4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 3401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 800.00 .00 .00 .00 800.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 850.00 .00 .00 .00 850.00 0.0 DIAL A RIDE 305,148.00 13,578.12 190,917.49 .00 114,230.51 62.6 3403 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 3403-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3403-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 525.00 16.36 510.05 .00 14.95 97.2 3403-4180 RETIREMENT .00 1.23 2.61 .00 2.61- *** 3403-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 6.42 .00 6.42- *** 3403-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS .00 .24 .51 .00 .51- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 525.00 17.83 519.59 .00 5.41 99.0 3403-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3403-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3,500.00 .00 1,400.00 .00 2,100.00 40.0 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 4,025.00 17.83 1,919.59 .00 2,105.41 47.7 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS 3408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,750.00 83.87 1,338.74 .00 411.26 76.5 3408-4180 RETIREMENT .00 6.28 11.58 .00 11.58- *** 3408-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 9.17 .00 9.17- *** 3408-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS .00 1.22 2.25 .00 2.25- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 1,750.00 91.37 1,361.74 .00 388.26 77.8 3408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3408-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 10,620.00 .00 .00 .00 10,620.00 0.0 COMMUTER XPRESS 12,370.00 91.37 1,361.74 .00 11,008.26 11.0 3409 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 3409-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 29 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3409-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,800.00 .00 657.13 .00 1,142.87 36.5 3409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 18,116.00 792.44 13,195.23 .00 4,920.77 72.8 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 19,916.00 792.44 13,852.36 .00 6,063.64 69.6 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 341,459.00 14,479.76 208,051.18 .00 133,407.82 60.9 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 341,459.00 14,479.76 208,051.18 .00 133,407.82 60.9 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 • PAGE 30 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4208 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STUDY 4208-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4208-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 2,000.00 .00 2,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8150-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 10,947.00 .00 4,609.00 .00 6,338.00 42.1 8150-4180 RETIREMENT 820.00 .00 350.69 .00 469.31 42.8 8150-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,027.00 .00 329.12 .00 697.88 32.0 8150-4189 FICA 159.00 .00 67.90 .00 91.10 42.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 12,953.00 .00 5,356.71 .00 7,596.29 41.4 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 412,532.00 .00 13,138.20 6,951.80 392,442.00 4.9 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 425,485.00 .00 18,494.91 6,951.80 400,038.29 6.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 427,485.00 _OO 20,494.91 6,951.80 400,038.29 6.4 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 427,485.00 .00 20,494.91 6,951.80 400,038.29 6.4 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 31 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2110 BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADVOCACY PGM 2110-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2110-4102 REGULAR SALARIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2110-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2110-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 16,830.00 .00 .00 .00 16,830.00 0.0 2110-4180 RETIREMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2110-4187 UNIFORMS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2110-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 2110-4189 FICA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** PERSONAL SERVICES 16,830.00 .00 .00 .00 16,830.00 0.0 2110-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2110-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,180.00 .00 .00 .00 1,180.00 0.0 2110-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2110-4304 TELEPHONE 450.00 .00 .00 .00 450.00 0.0 2110-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 215.00 .00 .00 .00 215.00 0.0 2110-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 1,325.00 .00 .00 .00 1,325.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,990.00 .00 .00 .00 1,990.00 0.0 BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADVOCACY PGM 20,000.00 .00 .00 .00 20,000.00 0.0 4100 PLANNING 4104 COASTAL PERMIT AUTH GRANT 4104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 23,166.00 .00 4,721.30 .00 18,444.70 20.4 8300 STORM DRAIN 8302 USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM 8302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8,959.00 1,062.50 3,357.50 3,524.50 2,077.00 76.8 8304 16TH ST STORM DRAIN IMPROVMNTS 8304-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8304-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 16,103.00 .00 8,285.52 .00 7,817.48 51.5 8304-4180 RETIREMENT 1,206.00 .00 632.61 .00 573.39 52.5 8304-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,510.00 .00 535.71 .00 974.29 35.5 8304-4189 FICA 234.00 .00 122.47 .00 111.53 52.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 19,053.00 .00 9,576.31 .00 9,476.69 50.3 8304-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8304-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,268,747.00 .00 .00 .00 1,268,747.00 0.0 16TH ST STORM DRAIN IMPROVMNTS 1,287,800.00 .00 9,576.31 .00 1,278,223.69 0.7 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 150 GRANTS FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 32 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,100,000.00 .00 989,742.50 110,257.50 .00 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,539,925.00 1,062.50 1,007,397.61 113,782.00 1,418,745.39 44.1 GRANTS FUND 2,539,925.00 1,062.50 1,007,397.61 113,782.00 1,418,745.39 44.1 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 33 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 34,992.00 2,915.96 26,243.64 .00 8,748.36 75.0 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3701-4327 AQMD INCENTIVES 1,500.00 80.00 235.00 .00 1,265.00 15.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 36,492.00 2,995.96 26,478.64 .00 10,013.36 72.6 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 36,492.00 2,995.96 26,478.64 .00 10,013.36 72.6 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 34 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2106 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 2106-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2106-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3,000.00 .00 3,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 2106-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2106-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,912.00 .00 2,199.27 .00 287.27- 115.0 2106-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 54,822.00 .00 40,389.81 .00 14,432.19 73.7 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 56,734.00 .00 42,589.08 .00 14,144.92 75.1 2106-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 2106-5601 BUILDINGS 1,218.00 .00 .00 .00 1,218.00 0.0 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 60,952.00 .00 45,589.08 .00 15,362.92 74.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 60,952.00 .00 45,589.08 .00 15,362.92 74.8 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 60,952.00 .00 45,589.08 .00 15,362.92 74.8 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 35 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT 4,939.00 .00 4,938.77 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 4,939.00 .00 4,938.77 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 4,939.00 .00 4,938.77 .00 .00 .00 .23 100.0 .23 100.0 .23 100.0 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 36 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 3102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 203,225.00 15,377.08 143,252.25 .00 59,972.75 70.5 3102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 7,200.00 397.49 2,383.02 .00 4,816.98 33.1 3102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,841.00 .00 .00 .00 6,841.00 0.0 3102-4180 RETIREMENT 15,096.00 1,145.18 10,670.42 .00 4,425.58 70.7 3102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 25,539.00 1,687.28 14,903.11 .00 10,635.89 58.4 3102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,155.00 105.17 1,008.99 .00 1,146.01 46.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 260,056.00 18,712.20 172,217.79 .00 87,838.21 66.2 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 148,620.00 21,276.50 102,877.49 17,082.23 28,660.28 80.7 3102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOV'T 3,400.00 .00 .00 .00 3,400.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 152,020.00 21,276.50 102,877.49 17,082.23 32,060.28 78.9 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4303 UTILITIES 983.00 96.91 777.03 .00 205.97 79.0 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,600.00 2,448.23 6,890.08 .00 5,709.92 54.7 3102-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 21,453.00 1,788.00 16,092.00 .00 5,361.00 75.0 3102-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 32,825.00 .00 21,880.00 .00 10,945.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 67,861.00 4,333.14 45,639.11 .00 22,221.89 67.3 3102-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3102-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 1,600.00 .00 .00 .00 1,600.00 0.0 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 481,537.00 44,321.84 320,734.39 17,082.23 143,720.38 70.2 8100 STREET SAFETY 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 0.0 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 152,898.00 .00 .00 .00 152,898.00 0.0 8300 STORM DRAIN 8305 INSTALL CDS CLARIFIER UNITS 8305-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8305-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 64,899.00 .00 .00 .00 64,899.00 0.0 8306 INSTALL CATCH BASIN INSERTS 8306-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8306-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8,438.00 .00 .00 .00 8,438.00 0.0 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8409 MANHOLE REPAIRS 8409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 160 SEWER FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 37 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 135,000.00 .00 .00 .00 135,000.00 0.0 8410 SEWER REHAB/LOMA DISTRICT 8410-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8410-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 34,400.00 .00 .00 .00 34,400.00 0.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8621-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,070.00 .00 1,069.11 .00 .89 99.9 8621-4180 RETIREMENT 89.00 .00 88.01 .00 .99 98.9 8621-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 107.00 .00 106.54 .00 .46 99.6 8621-4189 FICA 18.00 .00 17.05 .00 .95 94.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,284.00 .00 1,280.71 .00 3.29 99.7 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 1,284.00 .00 1,280.71 .00 3.29 99.7 8630 PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III 8630-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8630-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 4,691.00 .00 .00 .00 4,691.00 0.0 8630-4180 RETIREMENT 343.00 .00 .00 .00 343.00 0.0 8630-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 433.00 .00 .00 .00 433.00 0.0 8630-4189 FICA 65.00 .00 .00 .00 65.00 0.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 5,532.00 .00 .00 .00 5,532.00 0.0 8630-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8630-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 228,684.00 .00 .00 .00 228,684.00 0.0 PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III 234,216.00 .00 .00 .00 234,216.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,142,672.00 44,321.84 322,015.10 17,082.23 803,574.67 29.7 SEWER FUND 1,142,672.00 44,321.84 322,015.10 17,082.23 803,574.67 29.7 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 38 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2103 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 2103-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2103-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,000.00 .00 922.50 .00 4,077.50 18.5 2103-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2103-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1000 13,000.00 1,871.28 9,075.00 1,077.09 2,847.91 78.1 2103-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 19,832.00 4,500.00 20,111.06 .00 279.06- 101.4 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 32,832.00 6,371.28 29,186.06 1,077.09 2,568.85 92.2 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 37,832.00 6,371.28 30,108.56 1,077.09 6,646.35 82.4 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 53,000.00 .00 .00 .00 53,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 90,832.00 6,371.28 30,108.56 1,077.09 59,646.35 34.3 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 90,832.00 6,371.28 30,108.56 1,077.09 59,646.35 34.3 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 39 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 73,868.00 6,155.67 55,401.03 .00 18,466.97 75.0 2200 FIRE 2202 FIRE PROTECTION 2202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 17,316.00 .00 5,663.51 10,896.21 756.28 95.6 2202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,100.00 .00 4,340.83 .00 240.83- 105.9 FIRE PROTECTION 21,416.00 .00 10,004.34 10,896.21 515.45 97.6 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8610 FIRE STA UPSTAIRS REMODEL/ADDN 8610-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8610-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 10,271.00 .00 3,415.43 .00 6,855.57 33.3 8610-4180 RETIREMENT 769.00 .00 271.73 .00 497.27 35.3 8610-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 963.00 .00 242.88 .00 720.12 25.2 8610-4189 FICA 150.00 .00 52.57 .00 97.43 35.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 12,153.00 .00 3,982.61 .00 8,170.39 32.8 8610-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8610-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 287,847.00 .00 .00 .00 287,847.00 0.0 FIRE STA UPSTAIRS REMODEL/ADDN 300,000.00 .00 3,982.61 .00 296,017.39 1.3 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 395,284.00 6,155.67 69,387.98 10,896.21 314,999.81 20.3 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 395,284.00 6,155.67 69,387.98 10,896.21 314,999.81 20.3 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 40 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 8,861.00 .00 8,860.86 .00 .14 100.0 8100 STREET SAFETY 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,524.00 .00 12,524.00 .00 .00 100.0 8143 MONTEREY/19TH TO HERMOSA AVE 8143-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8143-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 3,349.00 .00 3,348.88 .00 .12 100.0 8143-4180 RETIREMENT 265.00 .00 264.14 .00 .86 99.7 8143-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 319.00 .00 318.75 .00 .25 99.9 8143-4189 FICA 53.00 .00 52.04 .00 .96 98.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 3,986.00 .00 3,983.81 .00 2.19 99.9 8143-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8143-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 230,929.00 103,900.27 105,919.05 80,644.73 44,365.22 80.8 MONTEREY/19TH TO HERMOSA AVE 234,915.00 103,900.27 109,902.86 80,644.73 44,367.41 81.1 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 40,640.00 .00 .00 .00 40,640.00 0.0 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8410 SEWER REHAB/LOMA DISTRICT 8410-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8410-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 43,600.00 .00 .00 .00 43,600.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 340,540.00 103,900.27 131,287.72 80,644.73 128,607.55 62.2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 340,540.00 103,900.27 131,287.72 80,644.73 128,607.55 62.2 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 41 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 .00 .00 .00 421.90 98.4 421.90 98.4 421.90 98.4 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 42 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,550,988.00 418,265.73 644,949.08 334,791.36 571,247.56 63.2 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,550,988.00 418,265.73 644,949.08 334,791.36 571,247.56 63.2 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 1,550,988.00 418,265.73 644,949.08 334,791.36 571,247.56 63.2 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 43 05/04/00 12:32:50 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,703,284.00 212.85 868,224.60 186,431.61 648,627.79 61.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,703,284.00 212.85 868,224.60 186,431.61 648,627.79 61.9 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 1,703,284.00 212.85 868,224.60 186,431.61 648,627.79 61.9 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 705 INSURANCE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 44 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1209 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1209-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1209-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 32,101.00 2,541.23 24,796.06 .00 7,304.94 77.2 1209-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,087.00 .00 .00 .00 2,087.00 0.0 1209-4180 RETIREMENT 2,326.00 183.78 1,798.04 .00 527.96 77.3 1209-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,433.00 320.94 2,887.59 .00 1,545.41 65.1 1209-4189 FICA 335.00 38.28 372.80 .00 37.80- 111.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 41,282.00 3,084.23 29,854.49 .00 11,427.51 72.3 1209-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1209-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 40,256.00 .00 9,492.19 .00 30,763.81 23.6 1209-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1209-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 504.11 624.35 .00 124.35- 124.9 1209-4315 MEMBERSHIP 320.00 .00 310.00 .00 10.00 96.9 1209-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 4,070.00 344.10 344.10 .00 3,725.90 8.5 1209-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00 3,808.14 108,466.46 .00 241,533.54 31.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 354,890.00 4,656.35 109,744.91 .00 245,145.09 30.9 LIABILITY INSURANCE 436,428.00 7,740.58 149,091.59 .00 287,336.41 34.2 1210 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 1210-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1210-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,305.00 .00 14,533.57 .00 5,771.43 71.6 1210-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1210-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 10,000.00 2,466.34 5,880.50 .00 4,119.50 58.8 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 30,305.00 2,466.34 20,414.07 .00 9,890.93 67.4 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT 1215-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1215-4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 10,000.00 .00 2,001.00 .00 7,999.00 20.0 1217 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1217-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1217-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 32,101.00 2,541.26 24,796.36 .00 7,304.64 77.2 1217-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,004.00 .00 .00 .00 2,004.00 0.0 1217-4180 RETIREMENT 2,326.00 183.80 1,798.54 .00 527.46 77.3 1217-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,433.00 321.01 2,888.37 .00 1,544.63 65.2 1217-4189 FICA 335.00 38.28 372.87 .00 37.87- 111.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 41,199.00 3,084.35 29,856.14 .00 11,342.86 72.5 1217-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 39,000.00 2,333.33 31,262.97 .00 7,737.03 80.2 1217-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,000.00 .00 2,185.84 .00 2,814.16 43.7 CONTRACT SERVICES 44,000.00 2,333.33 33,448.81 .00 10,551.19 76.0 1217-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 45 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1217-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,200.00 .00 16.26 .00 1,183.74 1.4 1217-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 1217-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 500,000.00 59,048.08 442,969.11 .00 57,030.89 88.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 503,700.00 59,048.08 442,985.37 .00 60,714.63 87.9 WORKERS COMPENSATION 588,899.00 64,465.76 506,290.32 .00 82,608.68 86.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,065,632.00 74,672.68 677,796.98 .00 387,835.02 63.6 INSURANCE FUND 1,065,632.00 74,672.68 677,796.98 .00 387,835.02 63.6 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 46 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 150.00 6.72 34.94 .00 115.06 23.3 1202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 200.00 .00 4.95 .00 195.05 2.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 350.00 6.72 39.89 .00 310.11 11.4 1202-4900 DEPRECIATION 1202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 2,850.00 6.72 39.89 .00 2,810.11 1.4 1206 DATA PROCESSING 1206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 42,576.00 3,429.00 30,861.00 .00 11,715.00 72.5 1206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 127.00 .00 .00 .00 127.00 0.0 1206-4180 RETIREMENT 3,189.00 240.04 2,160.36 .00 1,028.64 67.7 1206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,443.00 240.24 2,177.43 .00 265.57 89.1 1206-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 617.00 49.72 447.48 .00 169.52 72.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 48,952.00 3,959.00 35,646.27 .00 13,305.73 72.8 1206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 53,889.00 1,383.40 33,734.11 7,150.85 13,004.04 75.9 1206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1206-4304 TELEPHONE 6,430.00 450.55 3,169.67 .00 3,260.33 49.3 1206-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 3,400.00 4.68 3,326.08 .00 73.92 97.8 1206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,000.00 680.03 2,792.45 .00 1,207.55 69.8 1206-4315 MEMBERSHIP 120.00 .00 120.00 .00 .00 100.0 1206-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 960.00 .00 .00 .00 960.00 0.0 1206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,656.00 .00 1,104.00 .00 552.00 66.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,566.00 1,135.26 10,512.20 .00 6,053.80 63.5 1206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 6,950.00 .00 2,239.20 .00 4,710.80 32.2 1206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 29,700.00 3,780.72 16,855.59 .00 12,844.41 56.8 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 36,650.00 3,780.72 19,094.79 .00 17,555.21 52.1 DATA PROCESSING 156,057.00 10,258.38 98,987.37 7,150.85 49,918.78 68.0 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 1208-4900 DEPRECIATION 1208-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT 1,189.00 .00 .00 .00 1,189.00 0.0 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 23,000.00 1,756.34 17,360.87 .00 5,639.13 75.5 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 47 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 37,000.00 747.61 20,668.86 .00 16,331.14 55.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 60,000.00 2,503.95 38,029.73 .00 21,970.27 63.4 2101-4900 DEPRECIATION 2101-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 75,857.00 .00 .00 .00 75,857.00 0.0 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5403 VEHICLES 176,700.00 .00 167,944.67 .00 8,755.33 95.0 POLICE 312,557.00 2,503.95 205,974.40 .00 106,582.60 65.9 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4,000.00 484.99 4,737.07 .00 737.07- 118.4 2201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 6,000.00 509.18 8,760.60 .00 2,760.60- 146.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 10,000.00 994.17 13,497.67 .00 3,497.67- 135.0 2201-4900 DEPRECIATION 2201-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 2201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 60,581.00 .00 .00 .00 60,581.00 0.0 DEPRECIATION 60,681.00 .00 .00 .00 60,681.00 0.0 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5403 VEHICLES 300,000.00 .00 290,838.82 .00 9,161.18 96.9 FIRE 370,681.00 994.17 304,336.49 .00 66,344.51 82.1 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,900.00 188.33 1,363.96 .00 536.04 71.8 2601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,249.00 12.88 590.63 .00 1,658.37 26.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,149.00 201.21 1,954.59 .00 2,194.41 47.1 2601-4900 DEPRECIATION 2601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 7,500.00 .00 .00 .00 7,500.00 0.0 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5403 VEHICLES 95,000.00 .00 .00 .00 95,000.00 0.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 106,649.00 201.21 1,954.59 .00 104,694.41 1.8 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3,500.00 .00 297.46 .00 3,202.54 8.5 3102-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,500.00 49.72 789.00 .00 711.00 52.6 3102-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 25.64 1,199.55 .00 199.55- 120.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,000.00 75.36 2,286.01 .00 3,713.99 38.1 3102-4900 DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 48 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3102-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 7,500.00 .00 .00 .00 7,500.00 0.0 3102-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3102-5403 VEHICLES 95,000.00 .00 .00 .00 95,000.00 0.0 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 108,500.00 75.36 2,286.01 .00 106,213.99 2.1 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,050.00 220.41 1,624.03 .00 425.97 79.2 3104-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,000.00 13.15 1,948.41 .00 51.59 97.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,050.00 233.56 3,572.44 .00 477.56 88.2 3104-4900 DEPRECIATION 3104-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 6,250.00 .00 .00 .00 6,250.00 0.0 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5403 VEHICLES 81,250.00 .00 .00 .00 81,250.00 0.0 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 91,550.00 233.56 3,572.44 .00 87,977.56 3.9 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 7,500.00 411.22 3,217.19 .00 4,282.81 42.9 3302-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 9,000.00 823.58 7,749.39 .00 1,250.61 86.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,500.00 1,234.80 10,966.58 .00 5,533.42 66.5 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 23,540.00 .00 .00 .00 23,540.00 0.0 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5403 VEHICLES 19,080.00 .00 19,080.15 .00 .15- 100.0 3302-5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 104,121.00 .00 104,001.32 .00 119.68 99.9 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 123,201.00 .00 123,081.47 .00 119.53 99.9 COMMUNITY SERVICES 163,241.00 1,234.80 134,048.05 .00 29,192.95 82.1 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3701-5403 VEHICLES 53,583.00 .00 53,581.92 .00 1.08 100.0 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 625.00 45.41 577.92 .00 47.08 92.5 4201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,100.00 52.17 508.79 .00 591.21 46.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,725.00 97.58 1,086.71 .00 638.29 63.0 4201-4900 DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 49 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 4201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4201-5403 VEHICLES 40,000.00 .00 .00 .00 40,000.00 0.0 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 44,225.00 97.58 1,086.71 .00 43,138.29 2.5 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,600.00 111.69 1,509.22 .00 90.78 94.3 4202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,500.00 .00 1,811.29 .00 688.71 72.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,100.00 111.69 3,320.51 .00 779.49 81.0 4202-4900 DEPRECIATION 4202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 7,500.00 .00 .00 .00 7,500.00 0.0 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5403 VEHICLES 15,008.00 .00 14,568.92 .00 439.08 97.1 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 26,608.00 111.69 17,889.43 .00 8,718.57 67.2 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 700.00 63.98 442.10 .00 257.90 63.2 4204-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 700.00 .00 203.88 .00 496.12 29.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,400.00 '63.98 645.98 .00 754.02 46.1 4204-4900 DEPRECIATION 4204-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 900.00 .00 .00 .00 900.00 0.0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,300.00 63.98 645.98 .00 1,654.02 28.1 4206 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 4206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 79,510.00 6,751.76 60,448.34 .00 19,061.66 76.0 4206-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 .00 159.62 .00 340.38 31.9 4206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,659.00 .00 683.41 .00 2,975.59 18.7 4206-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4206-4180 RETIREMENT 5,956.00 509.40 4,573.76 .00 1,382.24 76.8 4206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,470.00 594.42 5,406.65 .00 2,063.35 72.4 4206-4189 FICA 442.00 38.68 348.53 .00 93.47 78.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 97,537.00 7,894.26 71,620.31 .00 25,916.69 73.4 4206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 2,500.00 .00 1,220.40 .00 1,279.60 48.8 4206-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 3,500.00 .00 1,220.40 .00 2,279.60 34.9 4206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3,000.00 442.34 1,950.72 .00 1,049.28 65.0 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 50 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4206-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,600.00 32.88 825.76 .00 774.24 51.6 4206-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,100.00 170.02 1,583.61 .00 483.61- 144.0 4206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,681.00 .00 7,784.00 .00 3,897.00 66.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 17,381.00 645.24 12,144.09 .00 5,236.91 69.9 4206-4900 DEPRECIATION 4206-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EQUIPMENT SERVICE 118,418.00 8,539.50 84,984.80 .00 33,433.20 71.8 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,200.00 46.44 438.45 .00 761.55 36.5 4601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,150.00 .00 1,357.74 .00 207.74- 118.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,350.00 46.44 1,796.19 .00 553.81 76.4 4601-4900 DEPRECIATION 4601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 1,700.00 .00 .00 .00 1,700.00 0.0 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4,050.00 46.44 1,796.19 .00 2,253.81 44.4 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 83,000.00 .00 .00 .00 83,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,645,458.00 24,367.34 911,184.27 7,150.85 727,122.88 55.8 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,645,458.00 24,367.34 911,184.27 7,150.85 727,122.88 55.8 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 51 ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND EXPENDITURE CONTROL 35,866,494.00 2,053,344.93 18,296,922.17 1,312,716.39 16,256,855.44 54.7 GRAND TOTALS 35,866,494.00 2,053,344.93 18,296,922.17 1,312,716.39 16,256,855.44 54.7 EXPPRIN2 05/04/00 12:32:50 DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE RECAP REPORT MARCH 2000 PAGE 52 ADJUSTED MARCH 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 001 GENERAL FUND 15,761,911.00 1,064,717.83 9,769,430.69 48,060.06 5,944,420.25 62.3 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 848,206.00 56,742.62 422,371.29 151,550.44 274,284.27 67.7 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,008,514.00 21,340.90 457,338.76 127,865.21 423,310.03 58.0 110 PARKING FUND 1,836,924.00 148,353.36 1,313,946.47 4,000.00 518,977.53 71.7 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 366,596.00 39,023.67 266,687.87 .00 99,908.13 72.7 117 AB939 FUND 55,938.00 1,708.26 15,420.88 .00 40,517.12 27.6 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 79,101.00 .00 70,581.76 .00 8,519.24 89.2 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 2,847,410.00 1,974.56 758,796.39 219,860.05 1,868,753.56 34.4 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 660,188.00 22,480.76 37,416.20 .00 622,771.80 5.7 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 588,232.00 .00 189,716.21 2,572.75 395,943.04 32.7 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 134,821.00 .00 745.00 .00 134,076.00 0.6 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 4,378.00 77.00 77.00 .00 4,301.00 1.8 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 5,533.00 12.00 12.00 .00 5,521.00 0.2 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 296,856.00 108.09 955.07 .00 295,900.93 0.3 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 341,459.00 14,479.76 208,051.18 .00 133,407.82 60.9 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 427,485.00 .00 20,494.91 6,951.80 400,038.29 6.4 150 GRANTS FUND 2,539,925.00 1,062.50 1,007,397.61 113,782.00 1,418,745.39 44.1 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 36,492.00 2,995.96 26,478.64 .00 10,013.36 72.6 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 60,952.00 .00 45,589.08 .00 15,362.92 74.8 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 4,939.00 .00 4,938.77 .00 .23 100.0 160 SEWER FUND 1,142,672.00 44,321.84 322,015.10 17,082.23 803,574.67 29.7 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 90,832.00 6,371.28 30,108.56 1,077.09 59,646.35 34.3 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 395,284.00 6,155.67 69,387.98 10,896.21 314,999.81 20.3 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 340,540.00 103,900.27 131,287.72 80,644.73 128,607.55 62.2 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 .00 421.90 98.4 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 1,550,988.00 418,265.73 644,949.08 334,791.36 571,247.56 63.2 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 1,703,284.00 212.85 868,224.60 186,431.61 648,627.79 61.9 705 INSURANCE FUND 1,065,632.00 74,672.68 677,796.98 .00 387,835.02 63.6 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,645,458.00 24,367.34 911,184.27 7,150.85 727,122.88 55.8 GRAND TOTALS 35,866,494.00 2,053,344.93 18,296,922.17 1,312,716.39 16,256,855.44 54.7 TREASURER'S REPORT - 000 A°.) --1-/Z FUND GENERAL 3/1/00 / v v 3/31/00 NUMBE ACCOUNT BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENT CHECKS ADJUSTMENT BALANCE 001 GENERAL $4,514,155.30 $752,210.86 $17,763.60 ($839,217.41) ($149,060.71) $4,295,851.64 , 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING $663,045.42 ($118.94) $2,353.63 ($51,892.31) ($6,330.89) $607,056.91 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT $496,656.03 $51,660.36 $1,798.22 ($21,120.03) ($710.12) $528,284.46 110 PARKING $53,012.01 $233,905.99 $348.93 ($121,918.17) ($73,065.33) $92,283.43 115 STATE GAS TAX $75,673.25 $35,080.58 $281.59 ($10,608.00) ($28,447.10) $71,980.32 117 AB939 $257,274.77 $822.14 ($1,317.68) ($349.29) $256,429.94 119 COMP ABSENCES $718,745.61 $718,745.61 120 COUNTY GAS TAX $15,367.12 $49.27 ($5.49) $15,410.90 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE ($513,646.21) ($236,325.79) ($1,591.42) ($751,563.42) 125 PARK REC FAC TAX $677,680.08 $3,396.00 $2,141.00 ($22,481.96) ($238.86) $660,496.26 126 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $396,596.88 $1,270.95 ($0.80) ($141.78) $397,725.25 127 BUILDING IMPROVMENT FUND $150,635.80 $482.70 ($53.84) $151,064.66 137 MYRTLE ADMIN EXP FUND $4,377.03 $13.78 ($12.00) ($66.28) $4,312.53 138 LOMA ADMIN EXP FUND $5,532.08 $17.34 ($12.00) ($1.62) $5,535.80 140 COMM DEVELOP. BLOCK GRANT ($843.82) $624.00 ($0.18) ($220.00) 145 PROPOSITION A FUND $34,343.33 $11,620.40 $106.21 ($14,137.11) ($434.11) $31,498.72 146 PROPOSITION C FUND $805,380.42 $17,292.55 $2,608.35 ($0.40) ($291.00) $824,989.92 150 GRANT FUND ($1,007,137.38) $1,117,607.00 ($1,062.50) $109,407.12 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT ($1,748.33) $4,845.46 $10,159.25 ($69.35) ($2,926.33) $10,260.70 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFOR SVC $22,255.19 $71.41 ($7.96) $22,318.64 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $2,527,881.20 $2,664.18 $70,845.36 ($45,268.51) ($5,029.11) $2,551,093.12 170 ASSET SEIZURE FUND $128,075.07 $3,567.07 $405.88 ($6,371.28) ($45.29) $125,631.45 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND $380,968.19 $22,238.00 $1,256.47 ($6,295.84) $398,166.82 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $850,493.98 $43,596.96 ($103,900.67) ($285.46) $789,904.81 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND $56,912.24 $182.16 ($20.34) $57,074.06 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDERGRND IMPR $1,304,530.63 $3,510.47 ($418,080.60) ($576.75) $889,383.75 308 LOMA UTIL UNDERGRND IMPROV $831,621.28 $2,664.84 ($510.15) $833,775.97 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMP $10,421.25 $32.91 (3.05) $10,451.11 615 MYRTLE AVE DIST HARDSHIP FUND $500.50 (409.50) $91.00 617 MYRTLE REDEMPTION FUND $59,194.93 $8,167.02 $264.18 ($65.00) ($18.50) $67,542.63 618 LOMA REDEMPTION FUND $39,943.56 $125.82 ($11.68) $40,057.70 705 INSURANCE FUND $2,337,205.82 $8,333.33 ($73,331.17) ($1,341.50) $2,270,866.48 715 EQUIP. REPLACEMENT FUND $1,380,673.64 $10,157.00 $59,186.96 ($24,064.88) ($11,579.16) $1,414,373.56 900 INVESTMENT FUND $0.00 $42,037.50 ($42,037.50) $0.00 $17,275,776.87 $2,316,955.03 $230,693.71 ($1,991,667.30) ($331,476.46) $17,500,281.85 TRUST BALANCE BALANCE ACCOUNTS 3/1/00 DEPOSITS CHARGES 3/31/00 PAYROLL $3,000.00 $726,050.70 $726,050.70 $3,000.00 BANK BALANCE CABLE TV DEPOSIT $10,000.00 $10,000.00 GENERAL $521,173.88 TRUST ACCTS $21,134.84 $17,085,369.93 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $393,002.66 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE 4117 7. �. N . WORKMAN, CITY TREASURER OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT $542,308.72 $114,396.80 $427,911.92 $17,085,369.93 BALANCE $17,513,281.85 ldcz) Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council of May 9, 2000 May 4, 2000 City Council Meeting MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of March 2000. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, J Workman asurer NOTED: Steph City nager NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Director 1d(s) } INSTITUTION 414.) INVESTMENT REPORT - DATE OF DATE OF CARRY MARKET FACE TOTAL INVESTMENTS MATURITY VALUE VALUE VALUE INTEREST LAIF 3/1/00 $11,990,990.68 3/31/00 $11,990,990.68 5.800% CORPORATE NOTES: MeatII Lynch & Co(Medium Term Note) $500,752.01 6/2/98 6/27/00 $506,460.00 $499,940.00 $500,000.00 6.470% Associates Corp North Amer $500,196.99 12/11/97 9/15/00 $501,190.00 $498,665.00 $500,000.00 6.270% Citicorp $498,439.68 6/21/99 2/15/01 $497,050.00 $493,820.00 $500,000.00 5.700% U.S. TREASURY BONDS/NOTES: United States Treasury Note $500,741.61 8/5/99 6/30/01 $501,132.81 $495,625.00 $500,000.00 5.800% United States Treasury Note $500,000.00 11/26/99 9/30/01 $500,000.00 $493,750.00 $500,000.00 5.700% U.S. GOVT AGENCY BONDS/NOTES Federal National Mtg Assn $557,120.06 2/23/99 5/2/01 $564,366.00 $546,821.00 $550,000.00 6.440% Federal National Mtg Assn $486,730.79 02/04/00 03/15/02 $485,670.00 $485,935.00 $500,000.00 5.530% U.S. GOVT AGCY -STATE TAX EXEMPT U.S. GOVT AGCY -STATE TAX EXEMPT DISC Federal Home Loan Bank $499,950.46 3/29/99 3/29/01 $499,900.00 $492,500.00 $500,000.00 5.270% Federal Home Loan Bank 5499,950.65 3/23/00 2/15/02 $499,950.00 $498,435.00 5500,000.00 6.770% Tennessee Valley Authorized Fed Book $550,497.00 6/19/98 5/1/00 $542,977.71 $550,290.30 $553,000.00 5.650% INVESTMENT TOTAL $17,085,369.93 $5,098,696.52 $5,055,781.30 $5,103,000.00 5.960% In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, JORKMAN SURER • `ate 5 9 ---aa May 2, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 9, 2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING AGREEMENT FOR RECEIVING STIP FUNDS FOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OF ARDMORE AVE. BETWEEN 1sT STREET AND 2ND STREET AND BETWEEN 25TH STREET AND GOULD AVE. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. 000155 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 0350 REV. 000 FOR PROJECT RPL -5155 (003) PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OF ARDMORE AVE. BETWEEN 1ST STREET AND 2ND STREET AND BETWEEN 25TH STREET AND ARDMORE AVE." Background: On January 27, 2000, Staff requested that Caltrans allocate $110,000 of Regional Improvement Program funding for Pavement Rehabilitation of Ardmore Ave. between 1st Street and 2nd Street and between 25th Street and Gould Ave. On April 17, 2000, Staff received official notification from Caltrans that the request has been approved and that this project is programmed in the 1998 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Under the terms for receiving the grant, City Council must approve, by Resolution, the Administering Agency -State Master Agreement No. 000155 and Program Supplement Agreement No. 0350 Rev. 000. Further, alterations should not be made to agreement language or funding. These documents are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. The proposed work has been identified as Project No. CIP 00-171 in the City's proposed FY 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program budget. While the total program cost is estimated to be $323,500, the budget request is $213,500 from the 301 CIP fund. The $110,000 in STIP funding will be used to help cover the total cost of the project. However, the STIP funds cannot be included in the budget until the agreement between the City and State is fully executed. Fiscal Impact: Upon receiving the fully executed agreement, $110,000 will be added to the City's revenues for the project. Attachment: Resolution to be adopted Respectfully submitted, CW arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director 2 Concur: Step City anager F\B95\Pwriles\Ccitems1Ardmore Rehab Stip Funds RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. 000155 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 0350 REV. 000 FOR PROJECT RPL -5155 (003) PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OF ARDMORE AVE. BETWEEN 1ST STREET AND 2ND STREET AND BETWEEN 25TH STREET AND ARDMORE AVE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, intends to continue to improve public convenience and safety, and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has applied for State Transportation Program Funds for Project RPL -5155 (003) Pavement Rehabilitation of Ardmore Ave. between 1st Street and 211d Street and between 25th Street and Gould Ave., and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to execute the Administering Agency -State Master Agreement No. 00155 and Program Supplement Agreement No. 350 Rev. 000 in accordance with Article I of the Master Agreement, and WHEREAS, the State's procedures require the City Council to certify, by Resolution, the approval of said agreements and the project. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approves and adopts the Administering Agency -State Master Agreement No. 000155 and Program Supplement Agreement No. 0350 Rev. 000 in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement. SECTION 2. Certifies that the City will comply with the terms and conditions of the aforementioned agreements. SECTION 3. Authorizes the Director of Public Works, as agent of the City of Hermosa Beach, to conduct all negotiations and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of Project RPL 5155 (003). -1- • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: FB95/Pwfiles/Resos/rehab ardmore stip fun -2- • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 2, 2000 Regular Meeting of May 9, 2000 APPROPRIATION REQUEST FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 99-144 RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation of $2,346 interest earned on Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds received for Project No. CIP 99-144 Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Walkway Between 24th Street and 35th Street. Background Funding received from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for. this project has earned interest, which must be spent by June 30, 2000 or be returned to the MTA. Fiscal Impact: Appropriation of $2,346 to account 115-8144-4201 will exhaust the remaining balance held in the TDA local portion of the State Gas Tax Fund. Respectfully submitted, Concur, Of/C,--0) Rhea Punneo Administrative Assistant Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director L.b / arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur, Ste • en '.:urre City Manager F:1B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\99-144 appropriation of funds.doc 1f PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE APRIL 4, 2000 MEETING Roll Call Present: Chairperson Gonzales, and Commissioners Francis, Bell, Fishman and Hirsch Staff: Rooney Announcement The meeting was adjourned in memory of Alice Ehlers, a longtime resident and member of the Hermosa Beach Lawnbowling and Garden Clubs. Approval of March 7, 2000 Minutes Motion: "To approve as submitted." Francis/Bell — All Ayes Matters for Commission Consideration A. Aloha Days Committee: Request for Approval of "Aloha Days" Longboard Surf Contest & Hawaiian Festival Mr. Abel Ybarra (Redondo Beach) of the Aloha Days Committee addressed the Commission on behalf of the event. Motion: "To approve: 1. The request from the Aloha Days Committee to hold their annual surf competition and "Aloha Days" Hawaiian Festival beginning on Saturday, August 12, 2000; and 2. Forward requests for (a) fee waivers, (b) funding, and (c) an additional day to Council for consideration; and 3. Approve the event contract (Attachment A) and forward it to City council for final approval. Fishman/Francis — All Ayes B. Community Center Lease Rates Motion: "To approve a lease rate increase of $.05 per sq. ft. each year for the next two Fiscal Years as follows: 1. FY 2000-2001 @ $1.08 per square foot, and 2. FY 2001-2002 @ $1.13 per square foot. Francis/Fishman — All Ayes 10 • i Items Requested by Commissioners A. Subcommittee Assignments Motion: "To add Robert Bell to the Clark Field Subcommittee". Francis/Fishman — All Ayes Motion: "To assign Geoff Hirsch as the Community Center Foundation Liaison".. Francis/Bell — All Ayes Staff Notes: 1. Next meeting will be held at 6:00 PM, May 2, 2000 in order to accommodate a special City Council Meeting. 2. Discuss playground sand sanitizing and restroom maintenance cycles with Superintendent Flaherty. Adjournment: 8:30 PM Francis/Hirsch — All Ayes • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 6D-4/ May 2, 2000 Regular Meeting of May 9, 2000 APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT. SPECIFIED PROJECT GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 99-144 THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the attached resolution entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SPECIFIED PROJECT GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STRAND BIKEWAY & PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET". Background: While the funding has been allocated for this project, under the terms of the County of Los Angeles Regional Park & Open Space District Specified Project and Per Parcel Discretionary Grant Programs, Applicants must submit an adopted Resolution demonstrating that its governing body has duly considered the project at a public meeting and has authorized the filing of the application. Fiscal Impact: No impact. Attachment: Resolution to be adopted Respectfully submitted, Rhea Punneo Administrative Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: C, bLia Harold C. Williams, P.E. Noted for fiscal impact: 61.4444a-4-04-) Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Steph R. c urrell City Manager F:\695\PWFILES\CCITEMS\99-144 Approval of Grant Application.doc 1h 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 00 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SPECIFIED PROJECT GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STRAND BIKEWAY & PEDESTRIAN WALK WAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET AND FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE BIKEWAY ENDING AT STRAND AND 35TH STREET TO CONNECT WITH THE BIKEWAY IN MANHATTAN BEACH WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 1992 and on November 5, 1996, enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree -Planting, Senior and Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection (the Proposition), which, among other uses, provides funds to public agencies and non-profit organizations in the County for the purposes of acquiring and/or developing facilities and open space for public recreation; and WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District (the District) to administer said funds; and WHEREAS, the District has set forth for the necessary procedures governing applications for grant funds under the Proposition; and WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the Applicant to certify, by resolution, the approval of the application(s) before submission of said application(s) to the District; and WHEREAS, the application form contains assurances that the Applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the Applicant certifies through this resolution; that the application is approved for submission to the District; and -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13' 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Project Agreement with the District for the performance of the project as described in the application; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approves the filing of an application with Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District for funds allocated under Section 8.a.5 of the Proposition for the above-named Project; and SECTION 2. Certifies that said Applicant understands the assurances and certifications in the application form; and SECTION 3. Certifies that said applicant understands its obligation to operate and maintain the property(s) in perpetuity; and SECTION 4. Certifies that said Applicant will sign and return within 30 days, both copies of the project agreement sent by the District for authorizing signature; and SECTION 5. Authorizes the City Manager, or designee, as agent of the City of Hermosa Beach, to conduct all negotiations, and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the project as described in the application. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 •21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -3- F/b95/pwriles/reso/99-144 approve app for grant funds - prop • •-yam May 2, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 9, 2000 APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PER PARCEL DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 98-621 MUNICIPAL PIER RENOVATION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the attached resolution entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PER PARCEL DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE MUNICIPAL PIER RENOVATION". Background: While the funding has been allocated for this project, under the terms of the County of Los Angeles Regional Park & Open Space District Specified Project and Per Parcel Discretionary Grant Programs, Applicants must submit an adopted Resolution demonstrating that its governing body has duly considered the project at a public meeting and has authorized the filing of the application. Fiscal Impact: No impact. Attachment: Resolution to be adopted Respectfully submitted, Rhea Punneo Administrative Assistant Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Steph n R. urrell City Manager F:\695\PWFILES\CCITEMS\98-621 Approval of Grant Application.doc 1i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 00 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PER PARCEL DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE MUNICIPAL PIER RENOVATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 1992 and on November 5, 1996, enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe neighborhood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree -Planting, Senior and Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection (the Proposition), which, among other uses, provides funds to public agencies and non-profit organizations in the County for the purposes of acquiring and/or developing facilities and open space for public recreation; and WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District (the District) to administer said funds; and WHEREAS, the District has set forth for the necessary procedures governing applications for grant funds under the Proposition; and WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the Applicant to certify, by resolution, the approval of the application(s) before submission of said application(s) to the District; and WHEREAS, the application form contains assurances that the Applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the Applicant certifies through this resolution; that the application is approved for submission to the District; and WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Project Agreement with the District for the performance of the project as described in the application; -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approves the filing of an application with Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District for funds allocated under Section 3.c.1 of the Proposition for the above-named Project; and SECTION 2. Certifies that said Applicant understands the assurances and certifications in the application form; and SECTION 3. Certifies that said applicant understands its obligation to operate and maintain the property(s) in perpetuity; and SECTION 4. Certifies that said Applicant will sign and return within 30 days, both copies of the project agreement sent by the District for authorizing signature; and SECTION 5. Authorizes the City Manager, or designee, as agent of the City of Hermosa Beach, to conduct all negotiations, and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the project as described in the application. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney F/b95/pwfiles/reso/98-621 approve app for grant funds - prop A dis -2- Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council April 24, 2000 Regular Meeting of May 9, 2000 INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT UPDATE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: At Council's direction, on July 1, 1999 Staff implemented an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program throughout the City and particularly on the Greenbelt from Pier Avenue north to Gould Avenue. In that area, we have eliminated the use ofall pesticides and herbicides. Analysis: In this "Pesticide Free Zone", the following has been noted: o There are several areas where a grass/weeds have developed and are spreading. o Residents continue to pull weeds in this area. o Residents have planted annuals that add a very appealing look when in bloom. o Residents continue to cut and remove ice plant, which will cause soil erosion in the future. In all other park areas the following has occurred: o The City has required the contractor to use a posted notification procedure when spraying pesticides, which also includes a prior authorization from the City. There is minor visible difference between the two sections of the Greenbelt. It is recommended that the test continue through June 30, 2000. Fiscal Impact FY99 — 2000 001-4202-4201 - 0 - (Contract Services) FY99 — 2000 001-4202-4309 $500 (Signs and Advertising) 1j Respectfully submitted, Concur: Kaaa>1 Michael Flaherty Public Works Superintendent • 1 Darold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stephe . = urrrell City Manager 2 F/B95/pwriles/ccitems/IPM Update 5-9-00 mtg April 27,. 2000 City Council Meeting May 9, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 00-1198 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FIRST PLACE AND ARDMORE AVENUE AT 603 FIRST PLACE AND 112-142 ARDMORE AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 106 THROUGH 110 INCLUSIVE, WALTER RANSOM COTS VENABLE PLACE . " Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Ordinance No. 00-1198, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of April 25, 2000, the ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: .Bowler, Dunbabin, Mayor Reviczky NOES: Edgerton, Oakes ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Noted: Stephen =urrel ' ity Manager Elaine Doerfling, y C 2a • ORDINANCE NO. 00-1198 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FIRST PLACE AND ARDMORE AVENUE AT 603 FIRST PLACE AND 112-142 ARDMORE AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 106 THROUGH 110 INCLUSIVE, WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. An application was filed by Michael Mulligan owner in escrow of real property at 603 First Place and 112-142 Ardmore Avenue seeking to amend the Zoning Map. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for a Zone Change on March 21, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. SECTION 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on April 25, 2000, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the requested Zone Change, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council. SECTION 4. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The requested change in zoning for the subject property from M-1 to R-2 will make the zoning for the subject property consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. -1- 2. Surrounding properties to the east, north and south are designated Medium Density Residential on the General Plan and Zoned R-2, with the exception of one adjacent lot immediately to the north which is not included in this request, which would remain M-1 zoned. Properties to the west are designation Low Density Residential, and zoned R-1. SECTION 5. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the Zone Change: 1. The Zone Change will bring the subject property into consistency with the General Plan for the City. 2. The subject property to be redesignated is appropriate for residential use as it is abutted by residential uses and located in an area which is predominantly residential in character. A residential use of the subject properties will be more compatible to surrounding residential uses than a potentially more intensive light manufacturing or commercial use. The residential use of the property will provide property tax benefits and will not unduly strain city services. 3. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their Environmental Assessment/Initial Study, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby ordains that the City's Official Zoning Map be amended as follows: 1. Amend the Zoning Map by changing the properties, as described below and shown on the attached map, from M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to R-2 (Two -Family Residential): 603 First Place and 112-138 Ardmore Avenue, legally described as lots 106 through 110 inclusive, Walter Ransom Co's Venable Place. -2- • • SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 8. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manner provided by law. SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -3- April 27, 2000 City Council Meeting May 9, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 00-1199 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE TWO-STORY MAXIMUM IN THE R-1, R -1A, R-2 AND R -2B ZONES, TO ELIMINATE DEFINITIONS OF STORY AND BASEMENT, AND TO CODIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING, MEASURING AND ENFORCING BUILDING HEIGHT." Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Ordinance No. 00-1199, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of April 25, 2000, the ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was amended to add "roof sheathing" to the end of the parenthetical phrase in Section 4.6.D. of the ordinance. The ordinance was then introduced by the following vote: AYES: Bowler, Dunbabin, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Noted: Stephe• Turrell, City Manager Elaine Doerfling, Cf y Cls 2h • • ORDINANCE NO. 00-1199 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE ELIMINATE THE TWO STORY MAXIMUM IN THE R-1, R -1A R-2 AND R -2B ZONES TO ELIMINATE DEFINITNS TO CODIFY IO OF PROCEDURE STORYAND ORE MENTCALCU A I NG, MEASURING, AND ENFORCING BUILDING HEIGHT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on September 21, 1999, to consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding maximum number of stories, and the height measurement procedure at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Commission. SECTION 2. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on April 25, 2000, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the text amendments, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council. SECTION 3. Based on the evidence considered at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. Most residential buildings are built with three levels; the ground level designed to qualify as a basement; and the floors above as the first and second story. 2. Most developers seek to maximize the building area and height, and to locate the primary living area at the view level. 3. The factor that effectively guides the height and appearance of building is the building height maximum, not the number of stories. -1- 4. Therefore, under the current building conditions, the story limitation does not serve any real purpose and actually is misleading and confusing. 5. In some cases the "story" limitation actually encourages the "artificial" raising of grades around a building to qualify the ground floor as a basement. If the two-story maximum is eliminated this practice would no longer be necessary for a project to comply with Zoning requirements, providing the option to either construct a three-story building (which under the U.B.C. requires two sets of stairways), or construct a two-story building with a basement placed partially below finished grade. 6. The proposed amendment will eliminate the misleading "story" limitation, and eliminate `inconsistency between the Zoning Ordinance and the Uniform Building Code relative to "basement" and "story," and codify current practice for calculating, measuring and enforcing building height. 7. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section 15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that these modifications to the zoning ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 4. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby ordains that the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Title 17 -Zoning, be amended as follows: 1. Amend Chapter 17.08, R-1 Single -Family Residential Zone, Section 17.08.030(A) pertaining to building height, as follows: "A. Building Height. Any building may have a maximum of two stories, but shall not exceed in any case a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet in height." -2- 2. Amend Chapter 17.10, R -1A Two Dwelling Units Per Lot Zone, Section 17.10.020(A) pertaining to building height, as follows: "A. Building Height. Any building may have a maximum of two stories, but shall not exceed in any case a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet in height." Refer to Chapter 17.22 for additional height requirements for condominiums. 3. Amend Chapter 17.12, R-2 Two -Family Residential Zone, Section 17.12.020(A) pertaining to building height, as follows: "A. Building Height. Any building - . • • . - - - • • shall not exceed in any case a maximum of thirty (30) feet in height." Refer to Chapter 17.22 for additional height requirements for condominiums. 4. Amend Chapter 17.14, R -2B Limited Multi -Family Residential Zone, Section 17.14.020(A) pertaining to building height, as follows: "A. Building Height. Any building • • • . - - , • • shall not exceed in any case a maximum of thirty (30) feet in height." Refer to Chapter 17.22 for additional height requirements for condominiums. 5. Amend Chapter 17.04, Definitions, Section 17.04.04 to eliminate the definitions for "Basement" and "Story." 6. Amend Chapter 17.46, to add Section 17.46.015 to read as follows: "17.46.015 Calculating, Measuring, and Enforcing Maximum Building Height The allowed building height is set forth in each specific zone. Determining maximum building height for any building in any zone is based on the definition for "building height" as contained in Chapter 17.04. The procedure for calculating, measuring, and enforcing building height requirements is as follows: -3- A. A detailed topographic survey, prepared and certified by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer, indicating all corner point elevations of a property shall be the basis for calculating building height. B. Maximum building height at critical points of the building shall be calculated by interpolating from the elevation points indicated on the survey. C. The maximum allowable building height shall be indicated at each critical point on the roof plan and building elevation plans. D. The building, while under construction and at the roof framing inspection stage, shall be surveyed to determine building heights at critical points on the roof (or uppermost portion of the building roof sheathing) corresponding to approved plans. The survey shall be conducted and certified by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. E. A building height verification letter shall be submitted indicating that the building is at or below the calculated maximum building height at the critical points before the roof framing final inspection is approved by the City. F. Alterations and expansions to existing one-story buildings not resulting in additional stories, and minor alterations to any building which are clearly below maximum height limits, may be excepted from these procedures at the discretion of the Director of the Community Development Department." SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manner provided by law. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -5- April 27, 2000 City Council Meeting May 9, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 00-1200 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 8.04 OF TITLE 8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.04 THERETO, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 8 (PUBLIC HEALTH LICENSING) AND DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 11 (HEALTH CODE), OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND PENALTIES." Submitted for adoption and waiver of full reading is Ordinance No. 00-1200, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of April 25, 2000, the ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was introduced by.the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Noted: Steph Dunbabin, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky -Edgerton Bowler None urrell, ity Manager Elaine Doerfling, City lglerk 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 00-1200 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 8.04 OF TITLE 8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.04 THERETO, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 8 PUBLIC HEALTH LICENSING) AND DIVISION 1 OF TITLE 11 (HEALTH CODE) OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND PENALTIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Chapter 8.04 of Title 8 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby repealed provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. . SECTION 2. A new Chapter 8.04 is hereby added to Title 8 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: "Sections: "Chapter 8.04 "HEALTH CODE ADOPTED 8.04.010 Public Health Licensing Regulations and Health Code adopted. 8.04.020 Copies filed. 8.04.030 Division: 1,Title 8 - amendments. 8.04.040 Division 1, Title 11 - amendments. 8.04.050. Civil remedies. 8.04.60 Penalties. "8.04.010 Public Health Licensing Regulations and Health Code adopted. Division 1 of Title 8 (Public Health Licensing) and Division 1 of Title 11 (the Health Code) of the Los Angeles County Code, as the same have been amended and are in effect on March 1, 1998, are -1- hereby adopted by reference, subject to the amendments set forth herein, and shall henceforth collectively be known as the Health Code of the City of Hermosa Beach. "8.04.020 Copies filed. A certified copy of Division 1 of Title 8 and Division 1 of Title 11, as adopted in Section 8.04.010, have been deposited with the City Clerk, and shall be at all times maintained by the Clerk for use and examination by the public. "8.04.030 Division 1, Title 8 - amendments. "A. Section 8.04.165 amended. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.04.010 of this Chapter, Section 8.04.165 of Chapter 8.04 of Division 1 of Title 8 of the Los Angeles County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 'Section 8.04.165 Food Official Inspection Report. "Food Official Inspection Report" means the written notice prepared and issued by the county health officer after conducting a routine inspection, and/or reinspection in the event a timely request for reinspection has been filed, of a food facility to determine compliance with all applicable federal, state, and.local statutes, orders, ordinances, quarantines, rules, regulations,or directives relating to the public health.' "B. Subsections A and B of Section 8.04.225 amended. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.04.010 of this Chapter, subsections A and B of Section 8.04.225 of Chapter 8.04 of Division 1 of Title 8 of the Los Angeles County Code are hereby amended to read as follows: 'A. "Grading" means the letter grade issued by the county health officer at the conclusion of the routine inspection, and/or reinspection in the event a timely request for reinspection has been filed, of a food establishment. The grade shall be based upon the scoring method set forth in this section resulting from the Food Official Inspection Report and shall reflect the food establishment's degree of compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, orders, ordinances, quarantines, rules, regulations, or directives relating to the public health.' B. "Letter Grade Card" means a card that may be posted by the county health officer at a food establishment upon completion of a routine inspection, and/or reinspection in 1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28. the event a timely request for reinspection has been filed, that indicates the letter grade of the establishment as determined by the county health officer using the scoring method set forth in this section. For the purposes of this provision, a food establishment shall include a food establishment operating in conjunction with a food processing establishment. Upon completion of a routine inspection of a food establishment, the county health officer shall advise the owner or operator thereof, in writing, of the actual grading and basis therefor as determined by the health officer. The Letter Grade Card and/or Inspection Card shall be immediately posted by the health officer and shall remain posted unless and until reinspection is timely requested as provided herein. If reinspection is timely requested, posting shall be immediately suspendedpending regrading following the reinspection. Nothing in this Chapter shall prohibit the county health officer from creating and using a Letter Grade Card in combination with an Inspection Score Card. The county health officer, in his discretion, shall determine whether to post the Letter Grade Card, the Inspection Score Card, or both.' "C. Section 8.04.275 amended. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.04.010 of this Chapter, Section 8.04.275 of Chapter 8.04 of Division 1 of Title 8 of the Los Angeles County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 'Section 8.04.275 Inspection Score Card. A. "Inspection Score Card" means a card that may be posted by the county health officer at a food establishment, upon completion of a routine inspection, and/or reinspection in the event a timely request for reinspection has been filed, that indicates the total numerical percentage score for the establishment as determined by the county health officer and as set forth in the Food Official Inspection Report. For the purposes of this provision, a food establishment shall include a food establishment operating in conjunction with.a food processing establishment. Upon completion of a routine inspection of a food establishment, the county health officer shall advise the owner or operator thereof in writing of the actual grading and basis therefor as determined by the health officer. The Inspection Score Card and/or Letter Grade -3- 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Card shall be immediately posted by the health officer and shall remain posted unless and until reinspection is timely requested as provided herein. If reinspection is timely requested, posting shall be immediately suspended pending regrading following the reinspection. Nothing in this Chapter shall prohibit the county health officer from creating and using an Inspection Score Card in combination with a Letter Grade Card. The county health officer, in his discretion, shall determine whether to post the Inspection Score Card, the Letter Grade Card, or both. B. The county health officer, in his discretion, may immediately close any food establishment which, upon completion of the routine inspection or reinspection where applicable, achieves a total numerical percentage score less than seventy percent (70%) as set forth in Section 8.04.225. Nothing in this provision shall prohibit the county health officer from immediately closing any food establishment if, in his discretion, immediate closureis necessary to protect the public health.' "D. Section 8.04.402 added. A new section 8.04.402 is hereby added to Chapter 8.04 of Division 1 of Title 8 to read as follows: '8.04.402 Request for Reinspection. "Request for Reinspection" means a written request, filed with the office of the county health officer or a county health department inspector present on an inspected premises, within three (3) business days of a routine inspection of a food establishment conducted for purposes of preparing a Food Official Inspection Report, Grade Letter Card, and/or Inspection Score Card, therein requesting reinspection of such establishment, which request may not be made more than once in any twelve month period. A written acknowledgment of receipt of the reinspection request shall be provided. The request shall be accompanied by payment of a reinspection fee as established by the Board of Supervisors. Payment of such fee to a health inspector, as permitted herein, may only be made by check or money order, payable to the County of Los Angeles. Reinspection shall be conducted not less than fourteen (14) calendar days following the timely filing of a request for reinspection and shall be limited in scope to those violations and areas and items of noncompliance identified during the prior routine inspection. -4- 1 2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Following reinspection, a revised Food Official Inspection Report shall be prepared and the establishment shall be regraded based upon the revised Report. The scores obtained with respect to areas and items which were found to be in compliance during the prior routine inspection, combined with scores obtained as a result of the reinspection, shall be the sole basis upon which a Letter Grade Card and/or Inspection Score Card may be prepared and posted following reinspection. A request for reinspection may only be filed by the owner or operator of the food establishment of which such routine inspection was conducted. Said three (3) day period within which to request reinspection shall not commence unless and until posting following a routine inspection has occurred or the owner or operator has otherwise been provided written notice of the actual grading and basis therefor as determined by the county health officer following the routine inspection, whichever occurs first.' "E. Subsections A, C and E of Section 8.04.752 amended. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.04.010 of this Chapter, subsections A, C and E of Section 8.04.752 of Chapter 8.04 of Division 1 of Title 8 of the Los Angeles County Code are hereby amended to read as follows: 'A. Subject to the provisions of Sections 8.04.225 and 8.04.275 of this Chapter, following a routine inspection, or reinspection if timely requested, the health officer shall post at the inspected food establishment the Letter Grade Card, the Inspection Score Card, or both, as determined by the health officer, so as to be clearly visible to the general public and to patrons entering the establishment. "Clearly visible to the general public and to patrons" shall mean posted in the following order of priority: 1. Posted in the front window of the establishment within five (5) feet of the front door. If such posting is not reasonably possible in the determination of the health officer, then posting shall occur as provided in subsection 2, below. 2. Posted in a display case mounted on the outside front wall of the establishment within five (5) feet of the front door. If such posting is not reasonably possible in -5- the determination of the health officer, then posting shall occur as provided in subsection 3, below. 3. Posted in such location as directed and determined in the discretion of the health officer to ensure the most effective notice to the general public and to patrons.' 'C. Except as provided in Sections 8.04.225 and 8.04.275 of this Chapter, and subsection A of this Section, neither the Letter Grade Card nor the Inspection Score Card shall be defaced, marred, camouflaged, hidden or removed, and it shall be unlawful to operate a food establishment unless posting of either Card, or both Cards, as determined by the county health officer, has occurred. Unauthorized removal of the Letter Grade Card, the Inspection Score Card, or both, is a violation of this Chapter and may result in the suspension or revocation of the public health permit and shall be punishable as specified in Section 8.04.930.' 'E. The Food Official Inspection Report upon which the Letter Grade Card, the Inspection Score Card, or both, are based and all subsequent reports issued by the county health officer shall be maintained at the food establishment and shall be available to the general public and to patrons for review upon request. The food establishment shall keep the Food Official Inspection Report and all subsequent reports until such time as the county health officer completes the next routine inspection, or reinspection pursuant to Section 8.04.402, of the establishment and issues a new Food Official Inspection Report.' "F. Section 8.04.755 amended. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.04.010 of this Chapter, Section 8.04.755 of Chapter 8.04 of Division 1 of Title 8 of the Los Angeles County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 'Section 8.04.755 Letter Grade Card and Inspection Score Card - Period of Validity. A Letter Grade Card, an Inspection Score Card, or both, shall remain valid until the county health officer completes the next routine inspection, or reinspection pursuant to Section 8.04.402, of the food establishment.' "8.04.040 Division 1, Title 11 - amendments. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.04.010, Section 11.20.020 of Chapter 11.20 of Division 1 of Title 11 is hereby amended to read as follows: -6- • • '11.20.020 Apartment House. "Apartment House" means any building or portion thereof which is designed, built, rented, leased, let, or hired out to be occupied, or which is occupied, as the home or residence of three (3) or more families living independently of each other and doing their own cooking in said building, and shall include flats and apartments.' "8.04.050 Civil remedies. The violation of any of the provisions of the Chapter, Codes or Regulations hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. "8.04.060 Penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of the Chapter, Codes, or Regulations hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of the Chapter, Codes or Regulations hereby adopted, or failing to comply with any of their requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of the Chapter, Codes or Regulations hereby adopted is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided herein." SECTION 3. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance or the Code or Regulations hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and the Code and Regulations hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect. -7- 4 SECTION 4. The City Council does hereby designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933 (c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney -8- w • 03= 12-1 May 3, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 9, 2000 SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPELLANT: APPEAL: APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99- 10 1250 8"' STREET PARK LEE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW ALL REQUIRED PARKING INCLUDING GUEST PARKING IN TANDEM. CONTINUED FROM APRIL 5, 2000 MEETING Recommendation: To sustain the Planning Commission's denial of the requested Variance by adopting the attached resolution. Background: LOT SIZE EXISTING FLOOR AREA PROPOSED ADDITION: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 3,754 Square Feet 1,612 Square Feet 2,230 Square Feet R- I Low Density Residential Categorically Exempt Analysis The Planning Commission denied the -Variance request on January 10, 2000 on the basis that it could not make the four mandatory findings for approval. The proposed project involves remodel and expansion to an existing building with a tandem garage and a 17 foot setback/guest space in order to comply with the parking requirement of three spaces. The existing structure has non -conforming side yard conditions which are to be corrected in the proposed remodel. The only non -conforming condition not proposed to be corrected is the provision of three required parking spaces in tandem utilizing an existing 9'-6"wide garage. The applicant is requesting a Variance to provide all required parking in tandem(two unit spaces in tandem with the guest space also in tandem). Section 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance states the following: "Tandem Parking means one automobile parked after or behind another in a lengthwise fashion. In this title, tandem parking is limited to not more than one automobile behind another. " By providing the parking in tandem through a Variance, the owner can avoid reconfiguring the existing garage and driveway to accommodate a standard side by side garage with required 17' garage setback. 4 In order to grant a Variance, the City Council must make the following findings: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances limit to the physical conditions applicable to the property involved. The lot is not unusually small and is similar to other R- I sized lots in the vicinity. (A "small lot" under R- I development standards is 2,100 square feet or less.). The lot is similar in character and configuration with surrounding lots. The lot width of 37.5 feet is typical along the subject block. The lot slopes north to south with a difference in elevation of 7.83 feet and east to west with a difference in elevation of 6.71 feet. The sloping lot presents difficulty in creating an enlarged driveway which conforms to the maximum 12.5% slope permitted in the Zone Code. As currently configured, the driveway has a slope of 10.9%. If the property were to be reconfigured adding an adjacent garage parking space in a typical side to side parking configuration, the slope becomes excessive (approximately 18 - 20 %) in the new driveway area. While this slope condition presents construction difficulties relative to adding a typical two -car garage to the existing structure, it can be accomplished by extending the run of the driveway, adding retaining walls to the west and reconfiguring the floor level above the garage. Such reconfiguration is extensive and costly as the applicant has noted in the attached letter, but is not inconsistent with the scope of the overall project which is proposed to include removal of the two building exterior side walls to make the side yards conforming, relocation of the existing garage to make the garage setback conforming and the addition of a new second floor level. The existing structure as situated on the lot is not grounds for a Variance. The applicant is making this request because of the cross slope of the lot which prevents the construction of a standard garage below the existing dwelling with the minimum 17 foot setback and the maximum 12.5% driveway slope. This slope condition which the applicant must design around is not extraordinary relative to other properties in the vicinity. A new conforming garage can be created by providing the required setback and minimum interior dimensions, however, the existing dwelling would have to be substantially reconfigured to elevate a portion of the first floor level and set the garage parking further under the existing dwelling so that the driveway does not exceed the maximum allowed slope of 12.5%. If the garage was setback approximately 9' (26' from back of sidewalk) the slope would meet the maximum of 12.5%. 2. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. The owners wish to exercise a property right, possessed by others in the neighborhood, to expand an existing substandard dwelling. The Variance may be necessary to retain the existing dwelling with an expansion to reach a size that the applicant finds comfortable and comparable to neighboring homes, but its difficult to support the finding the Variance is necessary to preserve a substantial property right, since it is clearly possible to either retain this structure with an expansion/remodel of up to 100% of the existing valuation, or demolish this structure and build a new home in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. • • 3. The granting of the Variance will not he materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The project will not be materially detrimental to property improvements in the vicinity and zone, since the project as proposed complies with all other requirements of the Zone Code and because the Variance would permit the required number of parking spaces (three) in conformance with the R- I development standards. 4. The Variance is not contrary to the General Plan. The project is not unusually large or out of scale with the neighborhood, and would substantially improve the property with a moden single family home, in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. The project would benefit the neighborhood with a substantially improved property. If the Variance is not granted for the tandem parking, the project will be considered a non -conforming remodel in excess of 100% of the project valuation which is not permitted. Staff believes that this is a substantial building renovation that justifies complying with parking standards and that there are other options to construct the project, which do not require a Variance. While it is possible to support the project relative to the third and fourth findings, it is not possible to support the first and second findings in order to grant the Variance request. Sol Blumen eld, Director Community `li evelopment Department Concur: Stephen(.R! B{irre'II City Manager Attachments: 1, Resolution 2. Correspondence 3. Location Map & Photo 4. Planning Commission Resolution of Denial Var99-10A TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 38 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-8849 (310) 318-9551 Fax Accident Analysis ALTA Surveys Assessment Engineering Budget Analysis Building Appeals Building Design Building Plans Building Inspections CC&R's Coastal Permits Conditional Use Permits Condominium Budgets Condominium Conversions Condominium Plans Construction Inspection Construction Staking Contract Administration Damage Assessment Drainage Plans D.R.E. Processing Earthquake Analysis Earthquake Engineering Electric Service Plans Energy Calculations Erosion Plans Estimating Expert Witness Feasibility Studies Fire Damage Appraisal Flood Analysis Forensic Engineering Foundation Inspections Gas Plans Grading Plans Hydrology Studies Industrial Tank Design Land Planning Landscaping Plan Legal Descriptions Legal Determinations Management Documents. Mapping Noticing Parcel Maps Parking Plans Pinks & Whites Presentations Radius Maps Remodel Plans Reserve Account Analysis Seismic Rehabilitation Sewer Plan Shoring Design & Plans Slope Failures Solar Reports Solar System Design Special Use Permits Storm Drain Plans Street Lighting Plans Street Plans Street Tree Plans Structural Appraisals Structural Design Structural Drafting Supervision Surveys Tract Maps Unreinforced Masonry Design Utilities Plans Utility Easements Variances Water Plans Working Drawings Zone Changes May 3, 2000 MAY - 3 X000 cirif MANAGERS OFFRIE City of Hermosa Beach 1015 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: City Planning Commission Re: 1250 - 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Various Request Mr. & Mrs. Park Lee - Our Job # 96-3563 Mr. & Mrs. Lee are in a difficult situation because of the configuration of their lot and layout of their existing house. They would like to remodel. They need more room for their expanding family. They cannot afford a new house of sufficient size in Hermosa Beach. They would like to stay on Eighth Street near relatives. They can afford to remodel. They wish to undertake a remodel to add a 2nd floor, but the house has only a one car garage and the existing driveway and garage are below the first floor. Plus, the Planning Department has calculated that the proposed remodel exceeds the code limit based on valuation. We ask to be allowed to construct the remodel with the existing garage only. If this is not acceptable, they can, at great expense, provide two covered parking spaces by demolishing a downstairs utility room to create a tandem parking configuration, this was requested by the Planning Department during their first review, and they can, (at additional expense) move the garage to face rearward to provide the setback for a guest parking space, also requested by the Planning Department at the second review, (Note, this solution adds approximately $30,000.00 to the cost of the project, a lot of money for two parking spaces). As you can see by looking at the plans this is the only reasonable solution for providing parking spaces on their property. This solution substantially increases the cost of the project, is not ideal and loses some internal square footage which they would dearly like to keep; but in order to add to the house, they are willing to make this economic and design sacrifice if necessary. There are two other solutions they cannot afford. 1. Complete demolition of the house, (they do not have enough money to do this, plus they would have added living expenses of $20,000 - $30,000 for the year of construction). 2. Demolition and reconstruction of about 50% of the existing living area, (their first floor) to install parking. This would add costs of $100,000.00 above the present proposal, and they could not live in it,. adding $20,000.00 - $30,000.00 to their cost. This alternative would cost less than a new house, but is still about $100,000.00more than they can afford. TRIAD • • Planning Commission Re: 1250 8th Street, Hermosa Beach Page 2 - May 3, 2000 The Lees would like very much to stay in Hermosa Beach, (where they have lived for 12 years). Next to their relatives, (who live down the street), keep their children in Hermosa Beach schools and continue with the life they have established here. It is circumstances such as this that the variance procedure is set up p to ameliorate. We feel that the following findings can be made: 1. The slope on the property, represents an extraordinary and unusual circumstance. The slope of the City street does as well, (the slope of the City street exceeds the present City driveway slope standard). The garage was previously constructed as a single car garage and legal at the time. The creation of a two car garage would cause a serious re -construction of the building. The building is small but can easily be remodeled, (if parking were not a problem) to provide a more modem and valuable structure. Most home owners would expect to be able to remodel. The complexities of tandem parking, 50% of valuation and slope limits team -up to preclude this remodel. 2. These property owners are being denied a substantial property right enjoyed by others in similar vicinity and zones. New construction can meet the requirements due to the flexibility of design to meet the code, however, a remodel is precluded due to the relationship of valuation and cost. (It appears that the intent of the City's 50% to 100% rule is to provide for second story remodels, but the low valuations dictated by Proposition 13, and the need to upgrade the mechanical systems and structure to support the second story disallows this). 3. The requested variance is in conformance with the General Plan of the City. The existing and future zoning is R-1. The house proposed is of such size as anticipated by the General Plan. 4. The proposed variance will not be a detriment to the general public welfare. Use of R-1 is relatively benign. It is anticipated under the General Plan. A modem remodel house should be a credit to the community and have a positive effect on the general public welfare. This proiect represents a considerable investment in the City of Hermosa Beach. In light of the situation, we request that the Council grant this variance, make the findings in favor of the Lees a . . • his project to continue. ac ood, P.E. TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 20C .ar Avenue, Suite 38 Hermosa Beach, C, J254 (310) 376-8849 (310) 318-9551 Fax Accident Analysis ALTA Surveys Assessment Engineering Budget Analysis Building Appeals Building Design Building Plans Building Inspections CC&R's Coastal Permits Conditional Use Permits Condominium Budgets Condominium Conversions Condominium Plans Construction Inspection Construction Staking Contract Administration Damage Assessment Drainage Plans D.RE. Processing Earthquake Analysis Earthquake Engineering Electric Service Plans Energy Calculations Erosion Plans Estimating Expert Witness Feasibility Studies Fire Damage Appraisal Flood Analysis Forensic Engineering Foundation Inspections Gas Plans Grading Plans Hydrology Studies Industrial Tank Design Land Planning Landscaping Plan Legal Descriptions Legal Determinations Management Documents Mapping Noticing Parcel Maps Parking Plans Pinks & Whites Presentations Radius Maps Remodel Plans Reserve Account Analysis Seismic Rehabilitation Sewer Plan Shoring Design & Plans Slope Failures Solar Reports Solar System Design Special Use Permits Storm Drain Plans Street Lighting Plans Street Plans Street Tree Plans Structural Appraisals Structural Design Structural Drafting Supervision Surveys Tract Maps Unreitforced Masonry Design Utilities Plans Utility Easements Variances Water Plans Working Drawings Zone Changes February 2, 2000 City Of Hermosa Beach 1035 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 FEB 0 2 202 (JOM. DEV. DEPT Re: 1250 8th St., H.B. - Our Job #96-3563 SET [1 FoR AFRI t. V.oc, We wish to appeal the decision of the planning commission of January 18, 2000, denying the variance request at 1250 8th Street by Mr & Mrs. Park Lee. Due to personal plans, we would like to be heard on April 14th, 2000. For T Woos, Rce 20367 TRIAD OEP?' 41b1- 030 —53 5. 150 49 48 47 93' . ° 4161- oze SPEYER 4161-023NAo., O O 46 45 44 43 42 1 716 (� 21 3/ 41 40 39 38 20 21 22 23 24 2 26 27 28 29 30 115111' t©$ 34 35 36 37 SAO!?3' 031 21 22 23 24 1250 8TH ST. SCALE $ as 100' ONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 6325 VAN NUYS BLVD. VAN NUYS. '91401 (818) 787 —1663 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 00-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUESTED VARIANCE FROM OFF-STREET PARKING (SECTION 17.44), TO ALLOW MORE THAN TWO VEHICLE TANDEM PARKING AT 1250 8Th STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS WEST 12.5 FEET OF LOT 44 AND ALL OF LOT 45, BLOCK 140 OF REDONDO VILLA TRACT. The Planning Commission does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Park Lee owner of real property located at 1250 8th street in Hermosa Beach, seeking a Variance from Section 17.44 to allow three car tandem parking. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for a Variance and expansion and remodel to a nonconforming building on January 18, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and -considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The -applicant is proposing to remodel and expand the existing one-story single family dwelling. A Variance is necessary to allow 3 vehicle tandem parking. The parking is necessary for the expansion to exceed 100% of existing valuation. 2. The applicant is proposing a 2,230 square foot expansion to a single-family dwelling. 3. The proposed expansion otherwise complies with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual fmdings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Variance: 1. There are not exceptional circumstances relating to the property because the lot is typical in size, topography and shape for the neighborhood. 2. The Variance is not necessary for the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity because it is clearly possible to either retain this structure with a 100% of existing valuation expansion, or demolish this Aft 1 1 2 3 4 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • structure and build a new home in compliance with all Zoning standards and comparable in size and amenities as the surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Section 5. The project is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15303 Class3 (b) and 15315 with the finding that the project is in an area with available services. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby denies the requested Variance. VOTE: AYES: Comms. Hoffman, Schwartz, Pizer, Ketz, Chmn. Perrotti NOES: none ABSENT: none ABSTAIN: none CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 00-1 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of January 18, 2000. Sam Perrotti, Chairman Date Varr99-10 �0 2 ector Blumenfeld explained that the applicant is requesting to continue to the February 15, 2 meets Chairman Perrotti ned the public hearing. Chairman Perrotti closed the p hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, se : • ded b 99-30/PDP 99-36/VAR 99-7 — Conditional Us Tentative Parcel Map #25678 for a cony- on of an ex and Variance to the 30' height lim 1136 —1140 Montere mmissioner Pizer, to CONTINUE CON it, Precise Development Plan and Vesting g duplex into a two -unit condominium ulevard. AYES: Hoffm. •, chwartz, Pizer, Vice -Chair Ketz, Chairman Pe NOES: , e ABSENT. None AB • IN: None 8. VAR 99-10 — VARIANCE TO HAVE REQUIRED PARKING INCLUDING GUEST SPACE IN TANDEM AT 1250 8TH STREET. Staff Recommended Action: To deny said request. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report. He read the definition for tandem parking in the Zoning Ordinance which precludes more than two cars. He also reviewed the four findings needed to be made to -grant a Variance. He indicated that staff could not make Finding #1 inthat the property is not extraordinary in its size or configuration, nor Finding #2 in that there is nothing extraordinary that would not allow the applicant to use the property. He noted however that the lot is steeply sloping which makes construction of the driveway difficult. He said that staff's recommendation is to find for Findings 3 and 4, but Findings 1 and 2 could not be made, therefore; it would not be possible to grant the Variance. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing. Park Lee, 1250 Eight Street, Hermosa Beach, feels there are some extraordinary conditions that should be considered. He further stated his family is growing which requires more room, and he enjoys the neighborhood. He also indicated a parking space would be added if the Variance were granted. Jack Wood, 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 38, Hermosa Beach, indicated that if the Variance is not granted, the applicant cannot remodel the house. He said the existing driveway which goes to a one car garage is nearly at the maximum slope allowed, and the only location to put an additional garage is uphill which exceeds the slope. Also, he noted the expansion is right under the kitchen of the existing building. He stated that in the rear of the garage is a laundry room under the floor which could be relatively easy converted into a garage. With the front setback and by moving the garage slightly, he said the required parking space could be provided at the exterior of the building for visitors. He explained the applicant cannot afford a new home, and the remodel would be more 2 P.C. Minutes 01-18-00 feasible. He further explained that the proposal is the best that could be expected for this particular piece of property and is within the spirit of the City's requirement of providing sufficient parking. He further has interpreted that tandem parking is allowed anywhere in town, as it is supported by the City Ordinances that require parking in the garage with guests behind it. He does not agree with staff's recommendations, and he feels there is an extraordinary and unusual circumstance with the unusual features of the lot. He also agrees that adding a second story would be considered a significant property right. Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman sympathized with the position of the applicant; however, the Commission must interpret the mandatory findings, and he said he cannot meet Finding #1. Vice -Chair Ketz agreed and said that having a triple tandem parking space will not be reasonable. She also said that the Commission is restricted by State law by the findings. Commissioner Schwartz agreed. Commissioner Pizer suggested that the applicant delay submittal until after City Council acts on several amendments including the new Ordinance not requiring guest parking for Rl. Director Blumenfeld suggested that the applicant might also want to reduce the scope of the project to less than 100% valuation, which could be approved without a Variance. Chairman Perrotti agrees that this application needs to be interpreted with the existing law, and he agrees that he cannot meet Finding #1. MOTION by Commissioner Schwartz, seconded by Commissioner Pizer to DENY VAR 99-10 — Variance to have required parking including guest space in tandem at 1250 8th Street. AYES:. Hoffman, Schwartz, Pizer, Vice -Chair Ketz, Chairman Perrotti NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 99-9/NR 99-8 — VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SIDE YARD OF 3.2 FEE RAT . • THE REQUIRED 4 FEET, AND TO ALLOW A 'i • TER THAN 50% EXPANSIO ' i A NONCONFORMING BUILDIN 635 HERMOSA AVENUE. Staff Recommended Action: To approve sa • quest. Associate Planner Robert Variance, and s mmarized the staff report. He reviewed the i at staff agrees all four findings could be met. C • firman Perrotti opened the public hearing. 3 (2 s to grant the P.C. Minutes 01-18-00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 C.C. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A REQUESTED VARIANCE FROM OFF-STREET PARKING (SECTION 17.44), TO ALLOW MORE THAN TWO VEHICLE TANDEM PARKING AT 1250 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS WEST 12.5 FEET OF LOT 44 AND ALL OF LOT 45, BLOCK 140 OF REDONDO VILLA TRACT. The City Council does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An appeal was filed by Park Lee owner of real property located at 1250 8th street in Hermosa Beach, seeking to appeal the Planning Commission denial of a Variance from Section 17.44 to allow three car tandem parking. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for a Variance and expansion and remodel to a nonconforming building on January 18, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. The City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission denial of the Variance on May 9, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 4. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to remodel and expand the existing one-story single family dwelling. A Variance is necessary to allow 3 vehicle tandem parking. The parking is necessary for the expansion to exceed 100% of existing valuation. 2. The applicant is proposing a 2,230 square foot expansion to a single-family dwelling. 3. The proposed expansion otherwise complies with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 5. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Variance: 1 1 1. There are not exceptional circumstances relating to the property because the lot is typical in size, topography and shape for the neighborhood. 2. The Variance is not necessary for the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the vicinity because it is clearly possible to either retain this structure with a 100% of existing valuation expansion, or demolish this structure and build a new home in compliance with all Zoning standards and comparable in size and amenities as the surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Section 6. The project is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15303 Class3 (b) and 15315 with the finding that the project is in an area with available services. Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the decision of Planning Commission and denies the requested Variance. PASSED AND APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2000 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Varr99-10A CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY i2 2 POWER POLE w/$7. EIGHT (91.64lfY �. z N 09'17'52' W /1 = 1r > 5 446' - . ONC DRIVEWAY 6' GBRW Ltss 14.78' • 11. \ \ \ \ �y11) fC' 1/ /1 • (939TDoos \ff•a • �J 9.60' \ \ \ \ \ ONE tTMD STORY STUCCO RESIDENCE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ M0010 FENCE I /r -/r -./r-// /r-rr-rr u/I17 Kat '—I— . .c+ °TR .. ,- • WALK . 2 • H 19 5•. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ . G' : CONC. MIX • • 1.1*Ea SET L8740 REE 20362 a (CRO O A (97.80) (99.6) F.G. GROSS\ :\ \6 199a oD°R ff. 3721' \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • '.(' ` • 1E7FR coma WALK • X99 f$ aRtar 32.63• ONE STORY STUCCO RESIDENCE OVER GARAGE \ t94e$• f W000 FLAMER u TND STORY r/--OVD6{4NC 635 f•0.' SET TXT TAGGED. R.GE 20362 (84.46) ORD. 0 PA COR. 100.07' 0= /1=--7/--u -- 13.97' 95) 8' GB.R.W. �GR.lSS4k a,. 03NC FOOTING 76'I AVOCADO TREE a' CRAW. l�cG' WOOD RET. WALL s 41, N 80'44'00' E 6' GBRW. N 09'17'52' W La- GBRW. SCALE: 1/4'61' -0- a.Z r" -u: W1700 FENCE 100.08' 9y° ll 11 _0 11 o ToPoG ! i1A P IJ O C S U J U V • 8' GBRW. EY 047E OF SURVEY: 09/01/99 DRAWING No. 963563LS EY • • • CRASS O' GBRW. 7. / 0.8.R.w. SET LATAG. R.GE 20367. (93.59) TAC ELEV. (9259) GRD.. 0 P/L COR. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 4 0 LEGAL DESCRIR DRAWN 8Y CHECKED BY APPROVED BY m O O 1 N DATE JOB 4.94.5453 SHEET NO. 2 OF SHEETS '31T= ht•LtiLY515: EXIST11JG LOT• 57.51'. 1c,o•m' = 3.750 P' E7QSTI tJ G :AGN p_E. 1. (-.. IQ 5 P • ::•ye - Ie`'ark 1=1,Fe1-1 50'5r- 112-°F0SEP REN1017F1- Apr -non! • - ilarJER •Ft_rx)K - 375 5-F- 4"..".oE: 12'1 - -37851-To•rl-L• 'PL•0o 4 • 19-r ri.mK G4 `2. 5.F. D rtcopz L .1 -2?„ 5P DEaK • .1z, 9T • , TcCaL 2,2 30 i4 17.17 LP :1 or.. 19 0 r 4 ' 3:12 �;i?nct+kf .ito.1s —4 /-' ua• az- -a4 dr _.1!firri_ luriNwair i • 000 P]AK MN.0 • I� a 5[11THo PLLAI reAur. Vs* •p -o^ a U 0 DRAWN BY CHECKED 8Y APPROVED BY 0 0 0 > DATE JOB .x-3$63 SHEET NO. 3 OF SHEETS • • Dim it -lo TH r _L IST FLOOR / DINING flZll1F '. LAP DEM. LAM iYALL5 T IZ5K4,AJtJ• . vir.LLS TO Z. -E DENIOLIEL7 c.ct.15-1-Fzil • IST FLOOR/GARAGE Vs/..191114a-- eUrSTiG °MUM --.171214,- St:. ULR SrALE• LOWER FLOOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY 1- 0 REVISIONS t; DATE 300-1%,35G3 - SHEET NO. 4 OF SHEETS z42 a 9' o'' t ,4a10 IAN 14i.• 4010 -0- a" I I 12—C AR 6 ARM, I i; ' L;tfz• FLoOF. _. -STORAGE • !ALL PURPOSE ROOM' ------ 0 In 0 IA 0 c,8 ' ev,ssmi•A Earr _ _ IBUILPIt4 FrRIAeltla. 02 4 EQ 402 .:- 2.e> : .• 2. 541/4 THAT to 4,FZ. 1,-G ••••• 44 4 4.2 .4. .19 .4•/„ , ;QUALIFIES LQDMIEIRLII LtGAL DESCRIPTION: DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY a 8.• 0 ttj S t; DATE Jos--drovi-ssa SHEET NO. 5 OF SHEETS 0 cr2'..co• S • j'soo1 23 -a. 411 1 1 4 t 0 co, Pdo ctta. • .2.40 1sayz. . . 1 MT FLOM PLARI 0^ 11•I g Kill g • noS6 IP (.')gdX r+,•ttl xZ!g 62. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY r, DATE JOB 90.3503 - SHEET NO. 6 OF SHEETS ......... ....-- 7_,.....ti.". — - - iNg. . . . i.' \ - 1 • . BEDROOM BEDROOM i1 MASTER tv • 44 1 4L .1.• .V-1. :. ow 1 i me1, v. Th, • - 1 ... . , ...„,-747c4q . ,„. Its" 14-0' V-3! — •-"Nill N. — 0 _• to . 1 ..CLO Li .. , _BATHROOM .. .. .FOYER -t f:\i" , i • - GUEST STUDY ' _ . = o 0 PORC , 4 — 1 .1-1IS .... 4HES.R' 0 -k; .._ -e- . ............ 4 / .• 1 4 t 0 co, Pdo ctta. • .2.40 1sayz. . . 1 MT FLOM PLARI 0^ 11•I g Kill g • noS6 IP (.')gdX r+,•ttl xZ!g 62. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY r, DATE JOB 90.3503 - SHEET NO. 6 OF SHEETS a 1•o 2 w Ck N 0 c '341 E:LV E'".,. DyTVTITWMCNf_gp. -..t.TtcoApe_ GuprE 6. TOG.seRT .. 5' -1. 361-o • • O .. T m V = ! O m SYM. REVISIONS DATE BY 0 < o m• • (DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMM M 1 ., M J • P�� K �. ., . ADDRESS: 1250 6tH 1.i cEu. HERMO5A BEACH CA. 90234 JOB SITE: 1250 6N STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 i #. OCS(71w1Mo IDT 45 1113 11 E WEST 1/2 3f LOT 44, BLOCK 144 REDONDO WL A TRACT, Ma 10-90-91 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: -LOT TRACT N BUILDING DESIGN AND ENGINEERING CML ENGINEERING AND SURVEY (213) 376-8849 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 38, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 120-.61 -- NO .14 AN. 7-'7304 zrbat Fa\ ". 140•111 • • 117. 11140 p -B• ei• V.1 14115P14 . -- - GARAGE "‘. LI El LI I:=1 Elti II 1-2.120.81/41 C (..., NO•41PB•) north elevation .14 -441' east elevation . . 95 14 • 61 re. • -1 • 0 DRAWN BY CHECKED 8Y APPROVED SY 5 z DATE .1013-K-TCA3SC:5- SHEET NO. 8 OF SHEETS south elevation 1 -40414,_. west o Iovcit ion ict . DRAWN BY CHECKED 8Y APPROVED BY 0 N_ N DATE JOB 11 SHEET NO. OF SHEETS kerm054 /WC- RECOMMENDED INSTALL SOLID CORE DOORS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 4 May S, 2000 OUTSTANDING BUILDING, ZONING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS IBIZA RESTAURANT 934 HERMOSA AVENUE BUILDING CODE VIOLATIONS • No building permit for converting garages into floor area. • No electrical permit for wiring for garages converted to floor area. • Installed removable patio cover without building permit (or Fire Department approval). • The electrical room is not permitted to be used for storage. • The electrical cords on the roof are for temporary interior use only. • The holes in the garage ceiling need to be sealed for fire stop. • Unused electrical conduit and electrical boxes must be covered. • The floor sinks are not vented. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT VIOLATIONS • Converted storage area into lounge area with additional seating. • Speakers in the outdoor area. • Sign on door leading to Palm Drive should be posted "Emergency Exit Only" and the door must be solid core. • Trash area not being cleaned at regular intervals to control odors. PARKING PLAN VIOLATIONS • Posted restricted parking signs not in compliance with Conditions of Approval. • Using required parking space for vehicle storage. ZONING- CODE VIOLATIONS • Restricted parking from common and/or shared use by patrons and employees of all the businesses in the complex (violation of approved Parking Plan also). SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION • • Reducing required parking with vehicle storage. MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS • Discharging water and debris from trash facility into alley (Palm Drive). • Excessive noise/music causing a public nuisance. ITEMS ON APPEAL TO COMPLETE • Reduce the hours of operation to 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. daily, except the outdoor patio area which shall be closed at 9:00 P.M. daily. Stop seating patrons after 8:30 P.M. and stop service to patrons at 9:00 P.M. • Obtain building and electrical permits for all areas converted from parking spaces to floor area. • ..Construct vestibule at the court yard entrance to the restaurant and eliminate entrance/exit at other locations. • Install Solid core door(s) between the approved storage area and the seating area, and keep closed during operating hours. • Install on both doors on the Palm Drive side, signs stating "Emergency Exit Only", and panic hardware with an alarm on each door. • _ Submit a revised floor plan and seating plan correctly showing the location and layout of bar and table seating and the maximum occupant load. • Remove chairs, couches, tables, audio systems, speakers and similar items from area designated for storage, including storage of these items. • Lock door to the trash storage area and only open for the purpose of allowing the trash collector to remove the trash. • Install a floor drain with a trap primer in trash facility area. Ibizaviolations CITY 0 F HERMOSA BEACH CAILIE FO .NIIA nglesidc Dr--+ Pr —' n sidc D _ Aorni g Mahattandws • 1; r>: .Y. is '.::::: rivSii: .: ••.v.:.::::+:::'4i;;• n :...... is ...... .:.. .�....3:.::::M1. COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARY PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTRICT B9UNDARY. • PARKING METER LOCATIONS (24-HOUR YELLOW & 2 -HOUR SILVER METERS) 11111111111=1111M1M11111M11 CITY OF HERMO SA BEACH: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT L RESIDENTIAL ON -STREET PARKING (RESTRICTED 1 -HOUR PUBLIC PARKING 10AM - 10PM) .SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 • Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 CITY COUNCIL DRAFT Revised 4/00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Implementing Ordinance Submitted to: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council and Planning Commission Submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER MAY 9, 2000 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION • Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714.966.9220 Fax: 714.966.9221 E-mail: costamesaRplanningcentercom CITY COUNCIL DRAFT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Implementing Ordinance Clp Submitted to: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council and Planning Commission Submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER MAY 9, 2000 INTRODUCTION The following document presents the proposed implementing ordinance portion of the City of Hermosa Beach Local Coastal Program as recommended by the Planning Commission. The proposed ordinance would apply to the portion of the City that is located within the Coastal Zone, excepint the original jurisdiction of the Coastal Commission as provided in Section 17.37 060 Revisions made pursuant of the City Attorney's final review and input from the Coastal Commission's attorney are highligl City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 1 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • CHAPTER 17.37 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE 17.37.010 Purpose 17.37.020 Definitions 17.37.030 Permit Required 17.37.040 Exemptions and Categorical Exclusions 17.37.050 Coastal Development Permit Applications 17.37.060 Determination of Jurisdiction 17.37.070 Resolving Jurisdictional Determination Disputes 17.37.080 Coastal Development Permit Notice Requirements 17.37.090 Coastal Development Permit Public Hearings 17.37.100 Coastal Development Permit Approval or Denial Findings 17.37.110 Conditions of Approval 17.37.120 Notice of Action and Appeal Rights 17.37.130 Appeals 17.37.140 Expiration of Unused Permits 17.37.150 Amendments to Coastal Development Permit Permits 17.37.160 Reapplication 17.37.170 Revocation of Coastal Development Permits 17.37.190 Enforcement 17.37.190 Emergency Coastal Development Permits 17.37.200 Continuing Validity of Permit 17.37.210 Local Coastal Program Amendments 17.37.220 Encroachments 17.37.230 Downtown Implementation Plan 17.37.240 Water Quality 17.37.250 Temporary/Special Event Calendar 17.37.010 Purpose. The regulations of this Chapter shall apply in the Coastal Zone, as defined by the California Coastal Act and map prepared by the California Coastal Commission and zoned as Coastal Zone Overlay (-CZ) on the City's Zoning Map. The Coastal Development Permit is established to ensure that public or private development within the Coastal Zone conforms to the policies and programs of the California Coastal Act (Division 20 of the Public Resources Code) as amended, the City of Hermosa Beach Certified Local Coastal Program, the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and any_ implementation programs. 17.37.020 Definitions Definitions of terms not contained herein, shall be the same those terms are defined in Coastal Act. "Appealable Development" means any development project that may be appealed to the Commission and is located within or constitutes any of the following: I. Approval of a development project located within any appealable area, as follows: a. All areas between the sea and first public road paralleling the sea or within three hundred (300) feet of the inland extent of any beach or the mean high tide line of the sea where there is no beach, whichever is the greater distance. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 2 Draft Implementing Ordinance b. All areas within one hundred (100) feet of any wetland, estuary, or stream and all areas within three hundred (300) feet of the top of the seaward face of any coastal bluff. 2. Approval or denial of a development project that constitutes a major public works project or a major energy facility. 3. Approvals of developments that require an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. "Applicant" means the person, partnership, corporation, or state or local government agency applying for a Coastal Development Permit. "Approving Authority" means a City officer, City Council, or commission approving a Coastal Development Permit. "Coastal Commission" means the California Coastal Commission. "Coastal Development Permit" means a permit issued by the City of Hermosa Beach, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, approving development in the CZ Overlay District as being in conformance with the Local Coastal Program. A Coastal Development Permit includes all application materials, plans and conditions on which the approval is based. "Coastal Policy Checklist" means a form prepared and completed by the Director as a guide for reviewing a Coastal Development Permit application for conformance with the Local Coastal Program. It shall list appropriate application information, all relevant Local Coastal Program policies, those policies with which the application does not comply, and recommended conditions, if any, which could be imposed to bring the application into compliance. "Coastal Zone" means that portion of the Coastal Zone, as established by the Coastal Act of 1976 and as it may subsequently be amended, that lies within the City of Hermosa Beach, as indicated on a map on record with the Department of Community Development. "Development" means on land, in or under water, the placement or erection of any solid material or structure; discharge or disposal of any materials; grading, removing, dredging, mining, or extraction of any materials; change in the density or intensity of use of land, including, but not limited to, subdivision pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with Section 66410 of the Government Code), and any other division of land, including lot splits, except where the land division is brought about in connection with the purchase of such land by a public agency for public recreational use; change in the intensity of use of water, or of access thereto; construction, reconstruction, demolition. or alteration of the size of any structure, including any facility of any private, public, or municipal utility; and the removal or harvesting of major vegetation other than for agricultural purposes, kelp harvesting and timber operations. "Director" means the City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Director. "Emergency" means a sudden unexpected occurrence demanding immediate action to prevent or mitigate Toss or damage to life, health, property or essential public services City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 3 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • "Local Coastal Program" means the City's land -use plans, Planning and Zoning Ordinances, zoning maps, and implementation actions certified by the Coastal Commission as meeting the requirements of the California Coastal Act of 1976. "Major Public Works Project" means: 1. A public works project that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) in its estimated cost of construction with an automatic increase in accordance with the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index, except for those governed by the provisions of Public Resources Code Sections 30610, 30610.5, 301611 or 30624. 2. Not withstanding the criteria in (1), "major public works" also means publicly financed recreational facilities that serve, affect, or otherwise impact regional or statewide use of the facilities. "Other Permits and Approvals" means permits and approvals, other than a Coastal Development Permit, required by the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning or Municipal Code before a development may proceed. "Overlay District" means a set of zoning requirements, described in the ordinance text and mapped, which is imposed in addition to the requirements of one or more underlying districts. Development in such districts must comply with the requirements of both the Overlay District and the underlying base zoning district and Area District. "Pemittee" means the person, partnership, corporation or agency issued a Coastal Development Permit. "Project" means any development as defined in this section. "Sea" means the Pacific Ocean and all harbors, bays, channels, estuaries, salt marshes, sloughs, and other areas subject to tidal action through -any connection with the Pacific Ocean excluding non -estuarine rivers, streams, tributaries, creeks, and flood control and drainage channels. "Sensitive coastal resource areas" means those identifiable and geographically bounded land and water areas within the Coastal Zone of vital interest and sensitivity. "Sensitive coastal resources areas" include the following: 1. Special marine and land habitat areas, wetlands, lagoons, and estuaries as mapped and designated in the coastal plan. 2. Areas possessing significant recreational value. 3. Highly scenic areas. 4. Archaeological sites referenced in the California Coastline and Recreation Plan or as designated by the State Historic Preservation Officer. 5. Special communities or neighborhoods which are significant visitor destination areas. 6. Areas that provide existing coastal housing or recreational opportunities for low- and moderate - income persons. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 4 Draft Implementing Ordinance 7. Areas where divisions of land could substantially impair or restrict coastal access. "Temporary/Special Event" is an activity or use that does not exceed a two week period on a continual basis, or does not exceed a consecutive four month period on an intermittent basis. A Temporary/Special Event involves the placement of non -permanent structures, such as film sets and equipment, bleachers, perimeter fencing, vendor tents/canopies, judging stands, trailers, portable toilets, sound/video equipment, stages, platforms, which do not involve grading or landform alteration for installation, and/or exclusive use of a sandy beach, parkland, water, streets or parking area which is otherwise open and available for general public use. "Exclusive use" means a use that precludes use in the area of the event for public recreation, beach access or access to coastal waters other than for or through the event itself. 17.37.030 Permit Required A. Coastal Development Permit Required. Any development in the Coastal Zone shall obtain a Coastal Development Permit, with the exception of projects identified in Section 30519 (b) of the Public Resources Code or a development specifically exempted by Section 17.37.040 this Division. B. Determination of Exemption or Categorical Exclusion. A determination of whether a development is exempt or categorically excluded from the Coastal Development Permit requirements shall be made by the Director at the time an application is submitted for development within the Coastal Zone pursuant to Section 17.37.040. Any dispute arising from the Director's determination shall be resolved pursuant to the procedure described in Section 17.37.070. C. Existing Coastal Development Permits or Applications in Process. The following shall apply to existing applications for Coastal Development Permits or existing Coastal Development Permits: 1. Development authorized by a permit issued by the California Coastal Commission shall remain under the jurisdiction of the Commission for the purposes of compliance, amendment, extension, reconsideration and revocation. 2. Any proposed development that the City preliminarily approved before effective certification of the Local Coastal Program and which has not been filed complete with the Commission, shall be re- submitted to the City through an application for a permit pursuant to the Local Coastal Program. 3. Any proposed development that the City preliminarily approved before effective certification of the Local Coastal Program and which has been filed complete with the Commission may, at the option of the applicant, remain with the Commission for review. Projects that elect to obtain a coastal permit from the Coastal Commission shall remain under the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in (1) above. 4. Upon effective certification of the Local Coastal Program, no applications for development within the certified area shall be accepted by the California Coastal Commission. 17.37.040 Exemptions and Categorical Exclusions A Exemptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the following projects asµlong asti at s+t all applicable zoning standards a`resaisfiedand „wheFe no discretionary zoning approvals are necessary: 1. Additions to existing single-family residences and ancillary structures such as garages, swimming pools, fences, storage sheds and landscaping with the exception of the following: City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 5 a. Development that involves a risk of adverse environmental effect pursuant to Section 13250, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. b. Improvements to any structure in the appealable area when such improvements could result in any of the following: (1) (2) (3) An increase of 10 percent or more of the internal floor area of existing structure(s) on the building site or an additional increase in floor area bringing the aggregate increase to 10 percent or more. The construction of an additional story or loft or increase in building height of more than 10 percent. The construction, placement or establishment of any significant detached structure such as a garage. c. Any significant alteration of land forms including removal or placement of vegetation on a beach, wetland, or sand dune, or within 50 feet of the edge of a coastal bluff or stream, or in areas of natural vegetation designated by resolution of the Coastal Commission as a significant natural habitat. 2. The maintenance, alteration or addition to existing structures, other than a single-family residence or public works facilities, provided the project does not involve: a. An adverse effects as specified in Section 13253, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. b. Any improvement to a structure that changes the intensity of use or use of the structure. c. Any significant alteration of land forms including removal or placement of vegetation on a beach, wetland or sand dune, or within 100 feet of the edge of a coastal bluff or stream or in areas of natural vegetation designated by resolution of the Coastal Commission as a significant natural habitat. 3. Repair or maintenance activities that do not result in an addition, enlargement or expansion unless classified as: a. Repair or maintenance of a seawall revetment, breakwater, groin, culvert, outfall or similar shoreline work that involves: (1) Substantial alteration of the foundation, including pilings and other surface and subsurface structures. (2) The placement, whether temporary or permanent, of rip -rap, or artificial berms of sand, or any other form of solid material on a beach, or in coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, or on shoreline protective works. (3) The replacement of twenty (20) percent or more of the materials of an existing structure with materials of a different kind. (4) The presence, whether temporary or permanent, of mechanized construction equipment or materials on any sand area or bluff or within twenty (20) feet of coastal waters or streams. b. The replacement of twenty (20) percent or more of a sea wall revetment, bluff retaining wall, breakwater, groin, or similar protective work under one ownership, unless destroyed by natural disaster. 4. The installation, testing, placement in service or the replacement of any necessary utility connection between an existing service facility and any development approved pursuant to the California Coastal City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 6 Draft Implementing Ordinance Act; provided that the Director may require reasonable conditions to mitigate any adverse impacts on coastal resources, including scenic resources. All repair, maintenance and utility hook-ups shall be consistent with the provisions adopted by the California Coastal Commission. 5. The replacement of any structure, other than a public works facility, destroyed by a disaster. The replacement structure shall conform to applicable existing zoning requirements; shall be for the same use as the destroyed structure, shall not exceed either the floor area, height or bulk of the destroyed structure by more than 10 percent; and, shall be sited in the same location on the affected property as the destroyed structure. 6. Maintenance dredging of existing navigation channels or moving dredged material from those channels to a disposal area outside the Coastal Zone, pursuant to a permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers. 7. Any category of development determined by the Coastal Commission to have no potential for any significant impact on the environment, coastal resources or public access to the coast. 8. Temporary/Special Event. a. Temporary/Special events shall be exempt from Coastal Development Permit requirements except those meeting any of the following criteria: 1. It is held between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day; and, 2. It occupies all or a portion of a sandy beach area; and, 3. In the opinion of the Community Development Director, the location, nature, configuration or length of the event, may result in impacts to coastal recreational opportunities and resources, access and impacts to the environment. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following are exempt: (1) If an admission fee is charged for entry to the event, the fee is for preferred seating only and more than 75% of the provided seating capacity is available free of charge for general public use; or, (2) The event is less than 24 hours in duration; or, (3) The event has previously received a Coastal Development Permit and will be held in the same location, at a similar season, and for the same duration, with operating and environmental conditions substantially the same as those associated with the previously approved event. c. The Director or the City Council may determine that a Temporary/Special event shall be subject to Coastal Development Permit review if unique or changing circumstances exist relative to a particular Temporary/Special event that have the potential for significant adverse impacts on coastal resources. Such circumstances may include the following: (1) The event, either individually or together with other temporary events`scheduled before or after the particular event, precludes the general public from use of a public recreational area for a significant period of time; City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 7 Draft Implementing Ordinance (2) The event and its associated activities or access requirements will either directly or indirectly impact environmentally sensitive habitat areas, rare or endangered species, significant scenic resources, or other coastal resources; (3) The event is scheduled between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day and would restrict public use of roadways or parking areas or otherwise significantly impact public use or access to coastal waters; (4) The event has historically required a Coastal Development Permit to address and monitor associated impacts to coastal resources. d. In addition to any necessary Coastal Development Permits, Temporary/Special Events must obtain a Special Event Permit from the Department of Community Resources. B. Categorical Exclusions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the following projects: 1. All projects consistent with the zoning ordinance that do not require discretionary review and are not located in the appealable area or are subject to appeal as stated in Section 17.37.130. 2. (RESERVED) Specific list of categorical exclusions to be submitted separately. un'rcipal improvement`K alter vehicular capac' control devices sue' accccs. raffle control'signing an Culvert replacement; ro�ects would riot raffle minor roadway improvcmcnts includin! Guardrails, retainingValls Signs for traffic control and guidance, including roadway markings an avement delInca tion;, Drainage course maintenance and cleaning involving less than 50 cubic yards of excavations Parking mctcr instaTiation and repair lnor.Deve lopmentInc ludtr a Sign permits in conformancciwith applicable provisions" of this code` variances that do no Mc* thrrid6 n ark ,9'136.110,{9a- heights, ani o no Impact :COOS taI..acccc City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 8 nstallatUon of irrigation lines. Iscellaneous Activities. including. a Installation to:trig,' placement in service or the replacement of any ncccsrary utility connection Coastal Development Permit.; {1)' IGcUancc of bui ngmpermits (2) IGcuance of business licenses; (3) Approval of fnal subdivision maps; and royal ofindIv' uai utility ccrvicc connections an4,44444,444-444, K.44.4 44. d di�conncctionc. 7. The City shall maintain a record of all permits issued for categorically excluded developments for public review. Each permit shall contain the name of applicant, location of project and a brief description of the project. 8. Notice for projects that are categorically excluded shall be provided to the Coastal Commission within five (5) working days. 17.37.050 Coastal Development Permit Applications A. Application. Applications for a Coastal Development Permit shall be approved prior to issuance of building permits. A Coastal Development Permit application shall be made to the Community Development Department on forms provided by the same Department. The required contents of the Coastal Development Permit shall be as set forth by the Community Development Department and shall be accompanied by the filing fee as established by resolution of the City Council. The applicant shall state in the application how: 1. The proposed development conforms to the certified Local Coastal Program. 2. The proposed development, located between the nearest public road and the sea, is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3, Division 20 of the Public Resources Code. B. Refusal of Acceptance of Application for Lack of information. The Director may reject, without a public hearing, an application for a Coastal Development Permit if such application does not contain the required information. C. Concurrent Filing. A Coastal Development Permit shall be considered concurrently with any other discretionary permits or approvals required for the project by the City. 17.37.060 Determination of Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 9 Draft Implementing Ordinance • . A. Determination. Prior to or at the time of an application for a Coastal Development Permit, the Director shall determine if the proposed project is located within an area that is: 1. An area where the California Coastal Commission continues to exercise Original Permit Jurisdiction, as defined in Section 30519 of the California Coastal Act, and the applicant must obtain a Coastal Development Permit directly from the Coastal Commission. 2. Appealable to the Coastal Commission and requires a Coastal Development Permit. 3. Non -appealable to the Coastal Commission and requires a Coastal Development Permit. 4. Categorically excluded or exempt and does not require a Coastal Development Permit. 17.37.070 Resolving Jurisdictional Determination Disputes A. Dispute Procedure. Where a question as to the appropriate jurisdiction has arisen, the following procedures shall establish whether a development is exempt, categorically excluded, non -appealable or appealable: 1. The local government shall make its determination as to what type of development is being proposed (i.e. exempt, categorically excluded, appealable, non -appealable) and shall inform the applicant of the notice and hearing requirements for that particular development. 2. If the determination of the local government is challenged, or if the local government wishes to have the Commission determine the appropriate designation, the local government shall notify the Commission by telephone of the dispute/question and shall request an Executive Director's opinion. 3. The Executive Director -shall, within two (2) working days of the local government request (or upon completion of a site inspection where such inspection is warranted), transmit his or her determination as to whether the development is exempt, categorically excluded, non -appealable or appealable. 4. Where, after the Executive Director's investigation, the Executive Director's determination is not in accordance with the local government's determination, the Coastal Commission shall hold a hearing for purposes of determining the appropriate designation for the area. The Coastal Commission shall schedule the hearing on the determination for the next Commission meeting (in the appropriate geographic region of the State) following the local government request. 17.37.080 Coastal Development Permit Notice Requirements A. Notice of Hearing. The Director shall provide notice of a hearing for a Coastal Development Permit by first class mail at least 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing to the following: 1. The applicant. 2. Property ownersand occupants, of_commercial:and residential property located within a 100 foot radius (not including public right of ways) ofthe perimeter of the parcel ofwreal property,of record nrhich the development is proposed. 3. The California Coastal Commission, public agencies that have an interest in the project, newspaper of general circulation. City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 10 4. Any person who has requested to be noticed of such permit. B. Contents of Coastal Development Permit Hearing Notice. In addition to the noticing required for public hearings in accordance with City Council policy, the notice for a Coastal Development Permit shall contain the following information: 1. A statement that the development is located within the Coastal Zone and is either Appealable or Non - Appealable to the Coastal Commission. 2. A statement of the public comment period. 3. The date of the filing of the application and the name of the applicant. 4. The file number assigned to the application. 5. A description of the development at its proposed location. 6. The date, time, and place at which the application will be heard. 7. A brief description of the general procedure concerning the conduct of hearing and local actions. 8. The procedure for local and Coastal Commission appeals, including any local fees required. 17.37.090 Coastal Development Permit Public Hearings A. Hearing. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review and consider an application for a Coastal Development Permit. B. Findings. All decisions on the Coastal Development Permit shall be accompanied by separate written findings, as specified in Section 17.37.100. C. Continuation of Action. A public hearing for a Coastal Development Permit may be continued without new public notice to another day if continued to a date certain. If the public hearing is continued to a date uncertain, notice of the continued public hearing shall be provided in accordance with Section, 17.37.080. 17.37.100 Coastal Development Permit Approval or Denial Findings A. Findings for Approval. An application for a Coastal Development Permit shall be approved when the evidence substantiates to the satisfaction of the approving authority the following findings: 1. The proposed development is in conformity with the Certified Local Coastal Program. 2. Any development, located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the Coastal Zone, is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of Division 20 of the Public Resources Code. 3. The proposed development conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). B. Findings for Denial. An application for a Coastal Development Permit shall be denied where the evidence fails to substantiate the basis for approval contained in Section 17.37.100 A. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 11 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • 17.37.110 Conditions of Approval The City may impose conditions as necessary to ensure that the Coastal Development Permit conforms to the requirements of the Local Coastal Program. The landowner and applicant shall record with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder an affidavit accepting and agreeing to implement all_ conditions of permit approval, and binding all successors to said conditions of approval, '6674 which Ghali run with the land. 17.37.120 Notice of Action and Appeal`Rights A. Notice of Final Action. Within seven (7)•calendar days of pfilinaI action on a Coastal Development Permit, the Director shall provide notice of such action by first class mail to the applicant, property owner, the Coastal Commission and to any person or agency who specifically requested notice of such decision by submitting a self-addressed stamped envelope to the Community Development Department. B. Contents of Notice of Action. The notice of action shall contain the following information: 1. Project description. 2. Written findings for approval and conditions of approval (if any). 3. Appeal procedure and appeal period as specified in Section 17.37.130. 17.37.130 Appeals A. Final Decision. A decision roll e Planning Corr mission shall be considered the final decision of the City when all local appeal periods, specified below, have been exhausted, andhe City l has'no initiated review and no appeal has been fileo rcachcd Otherwise the City Council`s decision shall be considered a final decision o Cou"noi B. Local Appeals 1. The City Council may initiate a review of the decision of the Planning Commission by any two votes of the City Council at ItS;We4 meeting dent succeeding the Planning Commission action pursuant to Section 2.52.040. In the event the Council initiates such a review, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its review hearing and takes final action on the Coastal Development Permit. 2. Within ten (10) days following the Council meeting that succeeds the Planning Commission action, an appeal in writing may be filed with the City Council by any person dissatisfied with the decision of the Planning Commission. The filing of such appeal within such time shall stay the effective date of the order of the Planning Commission until such time as the City Council has acted on the appeal. 3 Within forty (40) days of a review initiated by Council, or an appeal filed by a dissatisfied person, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing, which shall be noticed as required by Section 17.68.050. 4. The decision of the City Council, supported by findings as set forth in Section 17.37.10.0, shall be set forth in full in a resolution. 5. Within seven (7) calendar days of VA action Development Permit, the Director,shall provide notice gun on an appeal of a Coastal y Section` imissio a a1Se• City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 12 5. Within seven (7) calendar days of an action on an appeal of a Coastal Development Permit, C. Appeals to the Coastal Commission 1. Exhaustion of Local Appeals. An appellant must exhaust all local appeals under the City's appeal procedure prior to filing an appeal to the Coastal Commission. 2. Non Appealable Jurisdiction: A decision for a development located in the non -appealable jurisdiction is not appealable unless the development: a. Requires amendment to the Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. b. Constitutes a major public works project or a major energy facility. 3. Appellants: A decision for a development located in the appealable jurisdiction or as described in 17.30.130 C2 above may be appealed by: a. The applicant or aggrieved person who exhausted local appeals. b. Any two members of the Coastal Commission. 4. Appeal Time Limit: All appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days of the date of final local action on the Coastal Development Permit as oetined,in Section 13571(a), Title -24'6f iffeCaiiforniaCode of Regulations; 5 `Grounds for Appeal. The grounds for an appeal of a local decision on a development shall be limited to an allegation that the decision did not conform to the Certified Local Coastal Program, :60 :1-10.70:4* pu15hc access`: -polices of the Coastal Act.! 6. Effect of Appeal to the Coastal Commission. Upon receipt of a notice from the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission that an appeal has been filed the City shall refrain from issuing a building permit on the development, andMthe Ci 'saction,on thedeVeloprnentshall be stayed, pending Coastal Commission action on the appeal. 17.37.140 Expiration of Unused Permits A. Permit Expiration. If development authorized by a Coastal Development Permit has not commenced within the specified time, or if no time is specified, within two years of the granting of the permit, the permit becomes null and void with the exception of the following: 1. In the case of a permit for a publicly owned use the development shall be deemed to have commenced, no time limit,chall apply to ut izatlon of such permit provided that the public agency accomplished the following: a. Within one year of the approval date, the City either acquires the property involved or commences legal proceedings for its acquisition. b. Immediately after the acquisition of, or the commencement of legal proceedings for the acquisition of the property, posts such property with signs, having an area of not less than 20 square feet nor more than 40 square feet in area indicating the agency and the purpose of which it is to be developed. One such sign shall be placed facing and located within 5 feet of each street, highway or parkway bordering the property. Where the property in question is not bounded by a street, highway or parkway, the agency shall erect one sign facing the street, highway or parkway nearest the property. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 13 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • 2. In the case of a Coastal Development Permit heard concurrently with any other discretionary permit, the Planning Commission and/or City Council shall specify time limits and extensions to be concurrent and consistent with those of the land division, variance or other permit. 3. Extension of Permit. The Planning Commission may extend a permit for a period of not to exceed one year, provided an application requesting such extension is filed prior to such expiration date. In the case of a non-profit corporation organized to provide low-income housing, the Planning Commission may grant an additional one-year extension, provided that an application requesting such extension is filed prior to the expiration of the first such extension. B. Expiration Following Cessation of Use. A Coastal Development Permit granted by action of the Planning Commission or City Council shall automatically cease to be of any force and effect if the use for which such Coastal Development Permit was granted has ceased or has been suspended for a consecutive period of two or more years. 17.37.150 Amendments to Coastal Development Permits A. Amendment Procedure. An amendment shall be accomplished in the same manner specified for initial approval of the Coastal Development Permit. All sections of this Chapter shall apply to permit amendments. B. Application for Amendments. An amendment may be made to a Coastal Development Permit previously approved by the City by filing a written application with the Director. Such application shall contain a description of the proposed amendment, the reason for the amendment, together with maps, drawings or other material appropriate to the request. A filing fee, as required by Resolution of City Council, shall accompany a request for an amendment. C. Rejection of Application for Amendment. An application for an amendment shall be rejected if it would lessen or void theaeffect o compromico the original permit unless the applicant presents newly discovered material information which could not, with reasonable diligence, have been discovered and produced before the permit was granted. D. Action on Amendments. For those Coastal Development Permit Amendment applications accepted, the Director shall determine whether the proposed amendment represents an immaterial or material change to the permit. 1. For amendment applications representing immaterial changes, the Director shall prepare and send a written notice as required by Section 17.37.120, including a statement informing persons of the opportunity to submit written objections to the Director within 10 days of the date the notices were mailed to persons within a 300 foot radius. The Director shall also mail notices to all persons who testified at a public hearing on the permit and who submitted written testimony on the permit and such other persons as the Director has reason to know may be interested in the application. If the Director receives no written objections within 10 days of mailing, the Director's determination shall be conclusive and the proposed amendment approved. 2. For amendment applications representing material changes, objections to determinations of immateriality, or amendments to conditions affecting coastal resource protection or coastal access, a Coastal Development Permit Amendment is required per 17.37.150. A. The Director shall mail notices in accordance with Section 17.37.080, and to all persons who testified at the public hearing on the permit, submitted written testimony on the permit, objected to the Director's determination of City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 14 Draft Implementing Ordinance immateriality, or such persons as the Director has reason to know may be interested in the application. 3. The appropriate reviewing body shall review material changes and determine whether the proposed development and amendment are consistent with the California Coastal Act and the Certified Local Coastal Program. 17.37.160 Reapplication A. Reapplication Limit. No application for a Coastal Development Permit that has been previously denied shall be filed earlier than one (1) year after the date such denial becomes effective, unless the request for reapplication reflects a major change in circumstances and specific permission has been granted by the Approving Authority. 17.37.170 Revocation of Coastal Development Permits A. Grounds for Revocation. The City may initiate proceedings to revoke a Coastal Development Permit upon the receipt of evidence indicating that: 1. The applicant included inaccurate, erroneous and/or incomplete information, and if accurate and complete information had been provided, the Coastal Development Permit would not have been approved or different conditions of approval would have been imposed; or, 2 There was failure to- comply with notice provisions of Section 17 37 080, where the views of the person(s) not;notified were not otherwise made known to the,,City andcould have caused the City to require additional or different conditions, on a permit or deny p.n application. 3. The applicant is violating the conditions of approval, has been requested by the City to correct said violation, and has failed to correct a violation despite this request by the City. 4. The development is being operated in such a manner as to be a threat to public health and safety or is creating a nuisance. B. Initiation of Revocation. The City may initiate proceedings to revoke a permit based on evidence submitted by any person .constituting grounds for revocation as stated in sub section A 6b6V671568aiE6 of ihe reasons stated in Subsection A. The Director shall review the stated grounds for revocation and, unless the request is patently frivolous or was filed without due diligence and is without merit, shall initiate revocation proceedings. C. Temporary Suspension. Where the Director determines that grounds exist for revocation of a Coastal Development Permit, the operation of the permit shall be reviewed and be automatically suspended if it is a threat to public health and safety. The Director shall advise the applicant in writing that any development undertaken during suspension of the permit may be in violation of the California Coastal Act. D. Procedure for Revocation. The Director shall notify the permittee by mailing a copy of the request for revocation and a summary of the procedures contained in this section to the address shown in the permit application. The Planning Commission may, after a public hearing noticed and held in the manner prescribed in Sections 17.37.080 and 17.37.090, revoke or modify the permit. 17.37.180 Enforcement • In addition to the enforcement provisions contained in this ordinance, the provisions of the California Coastal Act contained in Chapter 9 of Division 20 of the Public Resources Code shall also apply with respect to violations and enforcement. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 15 Draft Implementing Ordinance 17.37.190 Emergency Coastal Development Permits A. Emergency Permits. In the event of a verified emergency, a temporary emergency authorization to proceed with remedial measures may be given by the Director until such time as a full Coastal Development Permit application has been be filed, as set forth in Sections 13136 through 13143, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. The application to be reported at the time of emergency or within three (3) working days after the emergency shall include the following: 1. Nature of the emergency. 2. Cause of the emergency, insofar as this can be established. 3. Location of the emergency. 4. The remedial, protective, or preventive work required to deal with the emergency. 5. The circumstances during the emergency that appeared to justify the cause(s) of action taken, including the probable consequences of filing to take action. B. Immediate Emergency Action. In some instances it may be necessary to take immediate action to protect life and public property from imminent danger, or to restore, repair, or maintain public works, utilities, or services destroyed, damaged, or interrupted by natural disaster, serious accident, or other emergency, before applications and procedures for obtaining a permit can be complied with in a timely manner. In such cases the requirements of obtaining a permit may be waived. The Executive Director of the Coastal Commission shall be notified of the type and location of the emergency action taken within three (3) days of the disaster or discovery of the danger, whichever occurs first. Within seven (7) days of taking such action, the Director shall send a written statement to the Coastal Commission of the reasons why the action was taken and verify that the action complied with the expenditure limits set forth in Public Resources Code Section 3061. C. Limitations. The Director shall not grant an Emergency Coastal Development Permit for any development that falls within an area in which the Coastal Commission retains direct permit review authority. In such areas, a request for an emergency authorization must be made to the Coastal Commission. D. Public Noticing. The Director shall provide public notice of the proposed emergency action. The extent and type of the notice shall be determined on the basis of the nature of the emergency. If the nature of the emergency does not allow sufficient time for public notice to be given before the emergency work begins, the Director shall provide public notice of the action taken, or being taken, as soon as is practical. Public notice of the nature of the emergency and the remedial actions to be taken shall be posted on the site in a conspicuous place, mailed to all persons the Director has reason to know would be interested in such action and to the Coastal Commission. E. Findings and Conditions. The Director may grant an Emergency Coastal Development Permit if it is found that: 1. An emergency exists that requires action more quickly than permitted by the procedures for a Coastal Development Permit and the work can and will be completed within thirty (30) days unless otherwise specified by the terms of the permit. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 16 Draft Implementing Ordinance . • 2 . Public comment on the proposed emergency action has been reviewed, if time allows. 3. The work proposed is consistent with the requirements of the Certified Local Coastal Program. F. Expiration of Emergency Permit. An Emergency Coastal Development Permit shall be valid for sixty (60) days from the date of issuance by the Director. Prior to expiration of the emergency permit, the permittee must submit a regular Coastal Development Permit application for the development even if only to remove the development undertaken pursuant to the emergency permit and restore the site to its previous condition. G. Report to City Council and Coastal Commission. The Director shall report the granting of an emergency permit to the City Council at its next scheduled meeting. The report shall include a description of the nature of the emergency, the development involved and the person or entity undertaking the development. Copies of the report shall be available at the meeting and shall be mailed to the Coastal Commission and to all persons requesting such notification of local coastal development decisions. 17.37.200 Continuing Validity of Permit A Coastal Development Permit that is valid and in effect, and was granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall adhere to the land and continue to be valid upon change of ownership of the land or any existing building or structure on said land. 17.37.210 Local Coastal Program Amendments The City Council may amend all or part of the Local Coastal Program, but the amendment will not take effect until it has been certified by the Commission. Any General Plan Element or Specific Plan or ordinance of the City that is applicable to the Coastal Zone must be reviewed and amended as necessary to make the General Plan Element or Specific Plan or ordinance consistent with the rest of the Local Coastal Program. A. Initiation of Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. An amendment to the Local Coastal Program may be initiated by one of the following: 1 A resolution of intention initiated by the Planning Commission. 2. A resolution of intention initiated by the City Council directing the Planning Commission to initiate an amendment. 3. An application from a property owner or his/her authorized agent provided that such application involves the development or modification of property located within the area affected by such amendment. B. Planning Commission Action on Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. 1. Upon receipt of a completed amendment application or duly adopted resolution of intention, a public hearing before the Planning Commission must be held and notice of such hearing given consistent with the Coastal Act and California Code of Regulations. 2. The Planning Commission must make a written recommendation on the proposed amendment whether to approve, approve in modified form, or disapprove. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 17 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • 3. Planning Commission action recommending that the proposed Local Coastal Program amendment be approved, or approved in modified form, must be considered for adoption by the City Council. Planning Commission action disapproving a proposed Local Coastal Program amendment may be appealed by any interested person, including a Commissioner or Council member, per Section 17.37.130. C. City Council Action on Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. The recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve or deny a proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment, or the appeal from a decision by the Planning Commission shall be considered by the City Council. A public hearing on the amendment shall be conducted after first giving notice of the hearing pursuant to Section 17.37.080. D. Fees. A fee for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program shall be established by a resolution of the City Council. E. Coastal Commission Certification of Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. Any proposed Amendment to the Local Coastal Program shall not take effect until it has been certified by the Coastal Commission. Any amendment approved by the City shall be submitted to the Coastal Commission in accordance with Sections 30512 and 30513 of the Public Resources Code. An amendment to the certified Local Coastal Plan shall not become effective until the amendment is submitted pursuant to the requirements of Section 13551 of the California Code of Regulations and certified by the California Coastal Commission pursuant to Chapter 6, Article 2 of the California Coastal Act. 17.37.220 Encroachments An encroachment is defined as any structure, object, use or landscaping owned by a private property owner that is proposed to be located on or over public property. A. Encroachment Permits. 1. All encroachments shall be required to obtain an Encroachment Permit, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 12.16, as well as any necessary Coastal Development Permits, as detailed in this section. 2. Any application for encroachment in the Coastal Zone shall be evaluated for conformance with the policies of the California Coastal Act and the Certified Land Use Plan. 3. Access in the Coastal Zone along public rights-of-way, such as paved sidewalks and walk streets, shall be protected. No permanent device, structure, use, object or landscaping preventing public access along paved sidewalks shall be permitted. B. Outdoor Dining on Lower Pier Avenue. 1. Applications for outdoor dining on Pier Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and the Strand shall be subject to Section 12.16, Encroachments, of the Municipal Code. 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of 17.37.220, A. above, applications for outdoor dining on Pier Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and the Strand shall not require a Coastal Development Permit as long as the provisions of Municipal Code section 12.16 are complied with. 17.37.230 Downtown Implementation Plan City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 18 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • The recommendations of the Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan, October 1994, regarding the revitalization of the Downtown area shall be utilized as guidelines in the design and improvement of streetscape and roadway improvements along portions of Hermosa Avenue (8th Street to 15th Street) and Pier Avenue (The Strand to the Greenbelt). 17.37.240 Water Quality In order to reduce urban runoff and its potential impacts to the Coastal Zone, the City of Hermosa Beach has adopted Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 8.44. The requirements and standards of this section shall be applicable in the Coastal Zone. 17.37.250 Temporary/Special Events Calendar The City of Hermosa Beach City Council shalt: adopt an annual calendar of major Temporary/Special Events on or before o every year. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 19 Draft Implementing Ordinance • The recommendations of the Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan, October1994, regarding the revitalization of the Downtown area shall be utilized as guidelines in the,.de n and improvement of streetscape and roadway improvements along portions of Hermosa velilie (8th Street to 15th Street) and Pier Avenue (The Strand to the Greenbelt). 17.37.240 Water Quality In order to reduce urban runoff and its pot ial impacts to the Coastal Zone, the City of Hermosa Beach has adopted Stormwater and Urbanoff Pollution Control Regulations, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 8.44. The requirements -r d'i standards of this section shall be applicable in the Coastal Zone. 17.37.250 Tempora Special Events Calendar The City of Hermo - Beach City Council shalt adopt an annual calendar of major Temporary/Special Events on °or.b- ore March 31 of everyyear. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 19 Draft Implementing Ordinance f • #00 oc 3 May 1, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 9, 2000 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. 98-57 LOCATION: 934 HERMOSA AVENUE APPELLANT SOUTH BAY HOLDING COMPANY LLC Recommendation: Adopt the attached Resolution, sustaining the Planning Commission's decision to modify the Conditional Use Permit with additional Conditions of Approval. Background: ZONING: C-2, Restricted Commercial GENERALPLAN: General Commercial FLOOR AREA: 3,469 Square Feet PARKING: 19 Spaces Shared with Other Building Tenants ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically Exempt, pursuant to Section 15303, Class 22 and 15315 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines with the finding that the project is an action by a regulatory agency to enforce or revoke a permit or other entitlement for the use issued. Pursuant to Chapter 17.20 of the Zone Code, the Planning Commission may after a public hearing revoke or modify any permit on any one or more of the following grounds: • The approval was obtained by fraud. • The use for which such approval is granted is not being exercised. • The use has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or more. • The permit is being exercised contrary to the terms or conditions of such approval, or in violation of any statue, ordinance, law or regulation. • The use is being exercised so as to be detrimental to the public health or safety or so as to constitute a nuisance. The City Council in 1978 granted a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant at the subject location. In 1984, the Board of Zoning Adjustment granted an amendment to the existing CUP to expand into the adjacent floor space. In 1995, the Planning Commission approved a Master Parking Plan for the entire restaurant/office/retail complex on the subject property. In November 1998, the City Council on appeal sustained the Planning Commission's September, 1998 CUP approval for On -Sale General Alcohol with Special Conditions including that the hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. Sunday through Thursday and until 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. This approval included the • • requirement that the project be reviewed after six months of operation. At the December 1, 1999 meeting, the Planning Commission extended the CUP compliance review period for two months in which time the business owner was directed to resolve several CUP violations including noise problems and obtain a final building permit and final Certificate of Occupancy. At the February 15, 2000 meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to set the matter for a public hearing at their next meeting for Conditional Use Permit revocation or modification due to continuing violations. At the March 18, 2000 meeting, the Planning Commission modified the approved CUP Resolution No. 98-57 by adopting Resolution 00-15 (Please See Attached Resolution). Analysis: The property is zoned C-2, with commercial uses located on commercially zoned property to the north and south, and residential uses on residentially zoned property to the east. The proximity of the residential neighborhood to the east has made nighttime noise at the restaurant a continuing problem and the City Council has limited operating hours to help resolve this problem. Other restrictions imposed previously to mitigate the noise problems included eliminating employee and customer parking at the rear of the property and limiting building ingress/egress on Palm Drive. PARKING: The Master Parking Plan, approved in 1995, serves as a means of mitigating the loss of parking spaces along Palm Drive adjacent to the residents and allows utilization of the space for additional office and storage. The property owner initially complied with the provisions of the Parking Plan, however, there are currently violations. Parking signs are posted which prohibit shared public parking arrangements. This defeats the purpose of the Parking Plan to maximize public parking. When certain businesses are closed, other businesses are open and should be able to use the parking without limitation. On May 2, 2000, staff found new signs posted restricting parking to the operating hours of one tenant, the restaurant operator, Pacific Foods. None of the signs indicate that there is public parking available as required under the Parking Plan. Also two vehicles, one without current registration, and a motorcycle are being stored in one of the spaces, which reduces available parking (Please See Attached Photo). CONVERSION TO FLOOR AREA: The Conditions of Approval for the general alcohol require compliance with the approved Parking Plan and that building permits be obtained for the garages converted to floor area along Palm Drive. A final Certificate of Occupancy for the remodeling of Ibiza restaurant is still being withheld since no new permits have been issued to complete the project. The business owner was notified on June 14, and 28, 1999 of this requirement and informed again by the Planning Commission at the December 1, 1999 CUP compliance review meeting. To date most of the work required to complete the project has been accomplished, but without a building permit or an inspection. Further, the converted garage area for the restaurant is shown as storage area on Commission approved project plans; but this area has been converted to a lounge with additional seating area (two couches) in violation of the Conditional Use Permit and previously approved Parking Plan (Please See Attached Plans). • NOISE COMPLAINTS AND NUISANCES: In order to reduce noise and other disturbances to the residents along Palm Drive, the City Council upon reconsideration of the Planning Commission's approved CUP, required that the exit to Palm Drive have a solid core, self closing door, with panic hardware and an "Emergency Exit Only" sign. The self-closing, panic hardware has been installed; however the sign has not been installed and the door is not solid core. Recently, this door was found pad -locked in violation of Section 1003.3.1.8 of the Building Code. (Please See Attached Photo). Adjacent neighbors have previously complained that the door was regularly ajar and used by employees and customers; late night deliveries are also made via the exit according to neighbors. Staff visited the site on February 14, 2000 and found the door ajar and the self-closing mechanism not operable (it was necessary to push the door closed into the lock position). Also, on March 14, 2000 staff visited the site again and found the self-closing mechanism still not operable. Staff also found at this time (February 14, 2000) that noise and music was drifting from the restaurant through a door adjacent to the storage area converted to restaurant and floor area. Some noise apparently drifted over the building and some was due to the door openings along Palm Drive. According to Police records, from February 1999 through January, 2000, there were a total of 45 calls regarding loud music, and/or noise, 2 battery incidents, and 16 minor crimes and/or rescues. These incidences continued after the Planning Commission's Conditional Use Permit compliance review in December at which time the Planning Commission directed the business owner to comply with the CUP, Zoning Ordinance, and Noise Ordinance. The police had not received any additional calls regarding noise or other disturbances from February 15, 2000 to March 14, 2000 however, recent check of Police records indicates that from March 14 to May 2, 2000 there has been two incidences of noise, one for loud music, and one for loud patrons leaving the restaurant. OUTDOOR SEATING AND INTERIOR SEATING LAYOUT: A patio cover and enclosure were constructed by the previous restaurant tenant over an outdoor dining area (without building permits) in the past to mitigate noise. During restaurant remodeling the cover and enclosure were removed at the direction of the Building Inspector, who found the enclosure unsafe. Plans submitted and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council for the Ibiza restaurant CUP did not indicate whether outdoor seating was permitted and it was not indicated on approved plans. Also the approved interior seating has been modified to increase the bar area and to reduce the table seating. Both of these modifications conflict with Condition No. 11, which states that "Any changes to the interior or exterior layout which alters the primary function of the restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission." In response to the added noise created by the open patio, the Commission recommended that the owner submit plans and obtain permits to completely enclosed the space and until such enclosure occurs that the patio use be prohibited past 9:00 PM. FIRE INSPECTIONS: The Fire Department, which routinely inspects businesses for fire safety purposes including patron occupancy load checks, visited Ibiza Restaurant. On several occasions the restaurant was found to be over -crowded and the business owner was warned that future violations will be cited. DISCHARGE OF WATER AND DEBRIS INTO PALM DRIVE. At the Planning Commission Public Hearing, residents submitted photos of the trash facility being cleaned and water and debris being swept into Palm Drive which is a violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 12.12.060 (Please See Attached Photos). ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Rather than revoke the CUP, the Planning Commission opted to add the following conditions to the Conditional Use Permit as a means to mitigate the negative impacts to the neighbors and set a date certain to review compliance with the intent of commencing with CUP revocation if there was substantial evidence that the owner was still not in compliance. The additional conditions are: • The hours of operation for the indoor portion of the restaurant shall be 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM, seven days a week and for the outdoor patio portion of the restaurant, the hours shall be 7:OOAM to 9:00 PM until there is compliance with all the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and until the Planning Commission allows extended hours of operation. • The restaurant entry shall be reconfigured to create one entry and a vestibule at the entrance to the restaurant shall be constructed. • Solid core door(s) shall be installed between the approved storage area and the seating area, and shall remain closed during operating hours. • "Emergency Exit Only" signs and panic hardware with an alarm on each door shall be installed on both exit doors to Palm Drive. • A revised floor layout and seating plan correctly showing the number of bar and table seats and the maximum occupant load shall be submitted for review and approval. • The CUP shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission for compliance with the Conditions of Approval at their June 20, 2000 meeting, and may extend hours if warranted. • Public address system or music amplification in the outdoor courtyard and any other outdoor area shall be prohibited. • All exterior doors and windows shall remain closed at all times during operating hours. • Chairs, couches, tables, audio systems, speakers and similar items shall be prohibited in the area designated for storage, including storage of these items. • The trash facility and bins shall be cleaned and treated at regular intervals to control odors; roof top vents shall be prohibited. • There shall be no dumping of trash or bottles between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. • The door to the trash storage area shall be closed, locked, and only opened for the purpose of allowing the trash collector to remove the trash. • Washing, sweeping, or by any means putting garbage, trash, debris or any other material onto the Palm Drive right way is strictly prohibited. • A floor drain with a trap primer shall be installed to collect wastewater in trash facility area and wastewater shall not be discharged into Palm Drive. • The door to the trash storage area shall be closed, looked, and only opened for the purpose of allowing the trash collector to remove the trash. • Washing, sweeping, or by any means putting garbage, trash, debris or any other material onto the Palm Drive right way is strictly prohibited. • A floor drain with a trap primer shall be installed to collect wastewater in trash facility area and wastewater shall not be discharged into Palm Drive. 4- In response to the appellant's letter dated April 6, 2000, staff has noted that most of the outstanding Building Code and CUP violations remain. (Please See Attached List) No plans have been submitted to the Community Development Department in connection with construction along Palm Drive or to correct the illegal conversion of a storage area to restaurant area. Plans have also not been submitted to enclose the patio area or create an entry vestibule as noise mitigation measures. The Parking Plan conditions required under the restaurant CUP have not been implemented and Fire Department staff have not directed the business owner to permanently lock an exit door to Palm Drive, as it is a required emergency exit for the building. Noise problems have been reduced as indicated by testimony given by residents of the area during the March 18, 2000 meeting of the Planning Commission, but the concern of the residents and the Commission is to find a long-term solution to noise problems by implementing the building and property improvements required by City Council and recently augmented by the Planning Commission. (Please See Appellant's Letter.) Sol Blumenfe d, irector Community d'velopment Department Concur: Stephe City Manager Attachments 1. Current and Previous Police Report 2. Project Plans as originally approved 3. Planning Commission Resolution 4. Proposed City Council Resolution 5. Correspondence 6. Photos 7. Appellant's appeal letter Cup9857appeal • • Hermosa Beach Police Department Activity Summary Ibiza Restaurant/Bar The following is a summary of police related activity for Ibiza (934 Hermosa Avenue) from February 1999 through January 2000. During this time period officers from the Hermosa Beach Police Department responded to Ibiza 96 times for police related incidents. Included in this total are calls for service as well as officer initiated security checks. The type of incidents handled were as follows: 415 music/noise 45 incidents 242 battery 2 incidents Security.check 33 incidents Miscellaneous incidents 16 incidents (minor crimes and/or rescues) By disregarding the security checks it can be seen that HBPD responded to 63 calls for service at Ibiza. Of these calls, 45 were for noise complaints from the surrounding area. It should by noted that 11 of these complaints were unfounded. In the remaining 34 complaints officers heard and observed the noisy behavior. When contacted, the owners or managers of Ibiza were usually cooperative and took steps to correct the behavior for the time being. However, noise complaints have continued during this time period with no permanent solution being implemented by the owners. Even with frequent security checks by officers the rate of noise complaints at Ibiza has remained steady. The following subjects have attended past Tavern Owners Association meetings on behalf of Ibiza: Kevin Wall Mark Marrone Paul Schmidt Submitted by: Sgt. Jaakola Community Lead ,;IN01003 HERMOSA CAD Address Inquiry PAGE: 1 MON, JAN 31, 2000, 10:48 AM Address: 934 HERMOSA AV Agency: P Dates: 010199/123199 Types: Date Time Type NOI Dispo RC/DI DI/AS AS/CC Incident 121999 121999 121899 121899 121799 121299 121099 120599 120499 120499 120399 112899 112799 112799 112799 112199 112099 112099 111399 111399 111399 110799 110699 110699 110699 102999 102999 102499 102499 102399 102399 101799 101699 101699 101699 101599 101499 100999 100999 100899 100299 100299 100199 100199 )92699 )92699 )92599 )92499 )92399 )91999 )91899 )91899 0059 OTHER 0047 415 2320 415 1956 SECCK 2046 SECCK 2127 415 2253 SECCK 0018 SECCK 2351 415 2308 415 2312 415 0053 SECCK 2211 SECCK 2026 SECCK 0419 MPAJ, 0142 SECCK 2343 SECCK MISC CRIMES LOUD DRUMS LOUD MUSIC SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK DISTURBANCE SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK DRUMS MUSIC MUSIC SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK MISSING PERSON SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK 035. 415 DISTURBANCE 2301 415 LOUD MUSIC 1455 PVTIMP PRIVATE IMPOUND 0038 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 0026 415 LOUD MUSIC 2155 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2124 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 1704 242R BATTERY REPORT 2303 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2137 415 LOUD MUSIC 0101 415 LOUD MUSIC 0033 415 LOUD MUSIC 2327 415 LOUD MUSIC 0030 415 LOUD SUBJS 0056 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2236 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2204 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 0052 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2329 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2345 415 LOUD MUSIC 0130 FLAG CITZ FLAG DOWN 0026 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2146 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 0039 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 0003 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2311 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 2217 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 0334 415 DISTURBANCE 0043 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 0030 415 LOUD MUSIC 2326 415 LOUD MUSIC 2308 415 LOUD MUSIC 0049 415 LOUD MUSIC 0128 415P DISTURB PARTY 0056 SECCK SECURITY CHECK HBO UTL UNF SEC SEC HBO HBO SEC UNF UNF HBO SEC SEC SEC RPT SEC SEC ADV HBO RPT SEC HBO SEC SEC RPT SEC ADV UNF UNF ADV ADV SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC HBO HBO SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC HBO SEC ADV UNF HBO HBO UNF SEC 00:00 00:14 00:07 00:00 00:00 00:06 00:00 00:00 00:28 02:12 00:05 00:00 00:00. 00:00 01:26 00:00 00:00 00:05 04:01 00:00 00:12 00:00 00:00 00:03 00:00 00:35 00:45 00:06 04:21 00:31 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:12 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 03:37 00:00 00:58 00:46 00:09 03:42 01:49 00:00 00:00 04:06 06:44 00:00 00:00 04:05 00:00 00:00 03:53 04:16 03:14 00:00 00:00 00:00 05:45 00:00 00:00 03:44 00:48 00:00 09:02 00:00 00:00 10:50 00:00 06:33 06:11 04:54 09:59 05:02 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 03:28 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 02:05 00:00 05:43 04:50 04:08 03:27 03:28 00:00 05:50 03:16 03:35 06:38 08:27 02:38 00:29 00:04 00:52 01:51 05:43 00:05 00:05 00:06 99:99 00:19 05:07 03:17 03:46. 00:32 00:05 00:06 00:06 55:39 00:06 07:20 07:04 04:05 01:37 03:42 00:11 00:08 00:11 00:06 00:25 01:39 05:08 00:11 00:07 00:09 00.:06 00:07 00:06 05:31 .00:06 07:12 02:38 04:08 04:04 03:39 02:50 9HB0022133 9HB0022131 9HB0022125 9HB0022112 9HB0022056 9HB0021753 9HB0021616 9HB0021262 9HB0021256 9HB0021249 9HB0021168 9HB0020784 9HB0020766 9HB0020755 9HB0020720 9HB0020411 9HB0020399 9HB0020360 9HB0020043 9HB0020019 9HB0019995 9HB0019635 9HB0019617 9HB0019614 9HB0019604 9HB0019101 9HB0019098 9HB0018793 9HB0018791 9HB0018782 9HB0018708 9HB0018369 9HB0018354 9HB0018350 9HB0018290 9HB0018281 9HB0018212 9HB0017841 9HB0017830 9HB0017809 9HB0017405 9HB0017399 9HB0017396 9HB0017382 9HB0017084 9HB0017071 9HB0016995 9HB0016992 9HB0016923 9HB0016620 9HB0016546 9HB0016538 „IN01003 HERMOSA Date Time Type NOI • AD Address Inquiry PAGE: 2 MON, JAN 31, 2000, 10:48 AM 091899 0049 415 LOUD MUSIC 091799 2152 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 091799 1603 PVTIMP PRIVATE IMPOUND 091699 2304 415 DISTURBANCE 091599 2139 415 LOUD MUSIC 091299 0108 415 LOUD MUSIC 091199 2308 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 091199 0120 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 090999 1559 470R FORG/STLN DOC R 090699 0432 415 MUSIC 090699 0127 415 MUSIC 390699 0043 415 MUSIC 090599 2307 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 090499 2300 415 MUSIC 390399 2252 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 382999 0036 415 NOISE/MUSIC )82899 2357 SECCK SECURITY CHECK )82299 0129 415 LOUD MUSIC )82199 2206 SECCK SECURITY CHECK 382099 2336 415 DISTURBANCE )81999 1442 242R BATTERY REPORT )81499 0101 415 LOUD MUSIC )80799 2316 415 DISTURBANCE )80699 1349 OTHER MISC CRIMES )80199 0242 415 NOISE )73199 2148 415 DISTURBANCE )73199 2136 415 DISTURBANCE )72599 1258 PVTIMP PRIVATE IMPOUND )72599 0112 415 MUSIC )72399 1323 OTHER CUP )71699 2330 415 LOUD MUSIC )71299 2222 ILLPKG ILLEGAL PARKING )70199 2216 415 MUSIC )62699 0005 415 MUSIC CT YARD )30399 1759 594R MAL MISCH RPT )22099 1732 594R MAL MISCH RPT Dispo RC/DI DI/AS AS/CC Incident UNF SEC NR ADV ADV ADV SEC SEC HBO HBO HBO HBO SEC ADV SEC HBO SEC HBO SEC HBO RPT HBO HBO HBO HBO ADV NR NR ADV HBO ADV HBO ADV HBO RPT HBO 00:48 00:39 04:30 9HB0016537 00:00 00:00 00:05 9E0016516 9E0016507 00:10 12:29 05:15 9HB0016488 03:23 01:37 03:21 9E0016435 02:36 03:11 02:47 9HB0016278 00:00 00:00 00:09 9E0016266 00:00 00:00 00:19 9E0016189 00:11 03:26 99:99 9E0016070 00:08 02:26 03:28 9HB0015862 00:07 21:28 00:02 9HB0015854 01:40 06:17 07:31 9HB0015847 00:00 00:00 05:39 9HB0015832 01:46 07:16 03:14 9E0015740 00:00 00:00 00:13 9E0015627 10:14 13:26 38:21 9E0015276 00:00 00:00 00:16 9E0015271 00:56 05:58 01:27 9HB0014878 00:00 00:00 00:20 9E0014857 00:00 00:00 09:13 9HB0014775 00:02 02:24 99:99 9HB0014638 00:42 04:33 02:29 9HB0014323 00:07 02:19 07:06 9HB0013867 00:10 01:15 09:17 9E0013725 18:23 00:55 01:49 9E0013366 02:49 01:44 05:07 9E0013324 09:30 00:55 02:12 9HB0013320 9E0012864 00:59 02:40 04:25 9HB0012837 00:03 02:35 20:43 9E0012673 00:35 03:36 05:23 9E0012219 40:42 00:03 04:13 9HB0011907 00:46 05:51 05:29 9HB0010863 03:57 04:16 20:55 9E0010452 9E0003683 01:10 16:00 08:30 9E0003124 • • ON, JAN 31, 2000, 10:39 AM )10 01/DSB POLICE INCIDENT BP: B :000) SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION ;OMMAND:PS [ 0D:934 HERMOSA AV C:HB R:IBIZA INFO: B FY:925 SUSP ACTIVITY BT:1 PD:8 FD:17 CN: MG:762G3 UD: i:OP RP: RA: PH: ZT:013000 0114 PRI:2 DC:ADV U: )114 /X -ST = 9TH ST COMMON -NAME = IBIZA )114 /RP ON THE LINE SAYS SHE SAW THE MGR TAKE A GIRL INTO THE OFFICE AND SHE I )114 / POSS UNCONSCIOUS )T:0115 ET: AT:0115 CT:0119 CRO:D15 DISP:D15 REC:1 FC: P:01+ PREVIOUS CLOSED CALLS AT ADDRESS [ 1/ 2] Recieve Time Type NOI Dispo District Close OnSiteTime 1 013000 0114 925 SUSP ACTIVIT ADV P/8 3019 : : 2 012300 0055 RES RESCUE HBO P/8 2303 : 3 012300 0055 RES RESCUE RPT F/17 2350 4 011500 0011 415 LOUD MUSIC ADV P/8 1520 5 010800 0027 415 LOUD MUSIC HBO P/8 0844 6 121999 0059 OTHER MISC CRIMES HBO P/8 1904 7 121999 0047 415 LOUD DRUMS UTL P/8 1955 8 121899 2320 415 LOUD MUSIC UNF P/8 1831 CIN01003 HERMOSA Address: 934 HERMOSA AV Agency: P Dates: 031400/050200 Date Time Type NOI CAD Address Inquiry PAGE: 1 TUE, MAY 2, 2000, 10:31 AM Types: Dispo RC/DI DI/AS AS/CC Incident 043000 042900 042900 042800 042500 042200 042100 042100 041500 041000 040800 040100 032500 032400 0021 2243 2106 2348 1603 0001 2330 2238 2041 1125 2147 2157 2114 2247 SECCK SECCK SECCK SECCK 470R 415 415 SECCK SECCK 470R SECCK 415 SECCK SECCK SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK FORG/STEN DOC R LOUD PEOPLE LOUD MUSIC SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK FORG/STLN DOC R SECURITY CHECK DISTURBANCE SECURITY CHECK SECURITY CHECK SEC SEC SEC SEC RPT HBO UNF SEC SEC HBO SEC SEC SEC SEC ro 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:47 00:07 00:06 00:00 00:00 00:03 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 06:19 08:20 06:13 00:00 00:00 01:58 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:06 00:06 11:11 01:22 99:99 01:04 05:53 00:37 00:10 14:58 02:40 00:43 02:41 00:32 OHB0007225 0HB0007215 0HB0007212 0HB0007159 0HB0006943 OHB0006721 0HB0006719 OHB0006712 0HB0006358 0HB0006086 0HB0005982 0HB0005537 0HB0005081 0HB0005016 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 •26 27 28 29 • i P.C. RESOLUTION 00-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AT 934 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 27-30, TRACT NO. 1564. The Planning Commission hereby resolves and orders as follows: Section 1. In November, 1998, the City Council on appeal sustained the Planning Commission's September, 1998 CUP approval for On -Sale General Alcohol with Special Conditions including that the hours of operation shalfbe limited to 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. Sunday through Thursday and until 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. This approval included the requirement that the project be reviewed after six months of operation. Section 2. At the Planning Commission meeting of December 1, 1999, the subject restaurant was given a six month review to determine compliance with the CUP Conditions of Approval. At this time, it was determined that there was not complete compliance, and the restaurant was given until February 15, 2000 to comply with all Conditions of Approval. At the February 15, 2000 meeting, the Planning Commission found that there continued to be lack of compliance and directed staff to schedule a public hearing to revoke or to amend the Conditional Use Permit (PC Resolution 98-57) for On -Sale General Alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the revocation or amendment for the Conditional Use Permit on March 21, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission -1- • • Section 4. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The business is currently not operating in compliance with the terms of the Conditional Use Permit approved in 1998, for -On -Sale General Alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant. A. The storage area as approved is being used for seating area. B. Building permits were not obtained for a portion of the construction completed. C. Final building permits and final Certificate of Occupancy have not been obtained for construction that was completed with a permit. D. The bar seating has been increased and the patio enclosure has been removed in violation of the project plans approved by the Planning Commission. E. The emergency exit only sign leading from the interior court to the door on Palm Drive has not been installed and the door has been left ajar exacerbating the noise nuisance to the residential neighbors to the east. F. Vehicles are being stored in the parking area, and signs have been installed improperly restricting the use of the parking area by customers and employees. 2. The use for which the CUP was granted is being exercised so as to be detrimental to the public health, and safety and constitutes a nuisance in that: A. According to the memorandum from the Police Department there were 45 noise complaints, 2 batteries, 33 security checks, and 16 incidences of minor crimes or rescues between February 1999 and January 2000. B. Numerous residents in the vicinity of the subject property indicated through oral testimony and written correspondence that noise emanating from the restaurant constantly disrupts their comfortable enjoyment of their homes. Section 5 Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The site is not an appropriate location for a restaurant with loud music and outdoor seating. -2- .n 2. The existing bar/restaurant as operated is not compatible with surrounding commercial and residential uses, and the imposition of conditions as required by Resolution 98-57 did not adequately mitigate the noise impacts and other nuisances to nearby residential or commercial properties; Section 6. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission hereby modifies the Conditional Use Permit, as amended, for General On Sale Alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant subject to the following Conditions of Approval which supersede the conditions contained in the original Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Resolution 98-57 and City Council Resolution 98-5939. Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans. Minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. A. Building permits shall be required for all areas converted from parking spaces to other uses. B. Building permits and occupancy shall not be finaled until the existing Parking Plan No 93-2 for the property has been implemented. C. The hours of operation for the indoor portion of the restaurant, seven days a week shall be 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM and for the outdoor patio portion of the restaurant, the hours shall be 7:OOAM to 9:00 PM until there is compliance with all the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and until the Planning Commission allows extended hours of operation. D. The restaurant entry shall be reconfigured to create one entry and a vestibule at the entrance to the restaurant shall be constructed. E. Solid core door(s) shall be installed between the approved storage area and the seating area, and shall remain closed during operating hours. F. "Emergency Exit Only" signs and panic hardware with an alarm on each door -3- • • shall be install on both exit doors to Palm Drive. G. A revised floor layout and seating plan correctly showing the number of bar and table seats and the maximum occupant Load shall be submitted for review and approval. H. The CUP shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission for compliance with the Conditions of Approval at their June 20, 2000 meeting, and may grant extended hours of operation at that time. 2. Public address system, or music amplification in the outdoor courtyard and any other outdoor area shall be prohibited. 3. All exterior doors and windows shall remain closed at all times during operating hours. 4. Chairs, couches, tables, audio systems, speakers and similar items shall be prohibited in the area designated for storage, including storage of these items. 5. The trash facility and bins shall be cleaned and treated at regular intervals to control odors; roof top vents shall be prohibited. a. There shall be no dumping of trash or bottles between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. 6. Deliveries shall be prohibited on the Palm Drive side between the -hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM. 7. The door to the trash storage area shall be closed, locked, and only opened for the purpose of allowing the trash collector to remove the trash. 8. Washing, sweeping, or by any means putting garbage, trash, debris or any other material onto the Palm Drive right way is strictly prohibited. 9. A floor drain with a trap primer shall be installed to collect wastewater in trash facility area and wastewater shall not be discharged into Palm Drive. General Operating and Standard Conditions: 10. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 11. The business shall prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business, or in the immediate area. -4- 1 • 12. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may, subject to the review of the Planning Commission, direct the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem. If the problem persists the Police Chief then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this Conditional Use Permit by the Commission. 13. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 14. Any changes to the interior or exterior layout which alter the primary function of the restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 15. The operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. Section 6 This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the Conditions of Approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense; the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25: 26{ 27 28 29 • • The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this conditional Use Permit. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Ketz, Pizer, Chinn. Perrotti NOES: Schwartz ABSTAIN: none ABSENT: none CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 00-15 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meet g of M )64-1 21, 2000 Sam Perrotti, Chairman Date Cupr9857revoke 7/ 02006 -6- / to Sol Blumenf:; d, Secretary 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 i • C.C. RESOLUTION 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, TO MODIFY AND TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AT 934 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 27-30, TRACT NO. 1564. The City Council does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An appeal was filed by South Bay Holding Company LLC business owner of Ibiza restaurant, at 934 Hermosa Avenue seeking to appeal the Planning Commission's decision to modify the current Conditional Use Permit by modifying and adding more Conditions of Approval. Section 2. In November, 1998, the City Council on appeal sustained the Planning Commission's September, 1998 CUP approval for On -Sale General Alcohol with Special Conditions including that the hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. Sunday through Thursday and until 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. This approval included the requirement that the project be reviewed after six months of operation. Section 3. At the Planning Commission meeting of December 1, 1999, the subject restaurant was given a six month review to determine compliance with the CUP Conditions of Approval. At this time, it was determined that there was not complete compliance, and the restaurant was given until February 15, 2000 to comply with all Conditions of Approval. At -1- the February 15, 2000 meeting, the Planning Commission found that there continued to be lack of compliance and directed staff to schedule a public hearing to revoke or to amend the Conditional Use Permit (PC Resolution 98-57) for On -Sale General Alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant. Section 4. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the revocation or amendment for the Conditional Use Permit on March 21, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 5. The City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on May 9, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 6. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following factual findings: 1. The business is currently not operating in compliance with the terms of the Conditional Use Permit approved in 1998, for On -Sale General Alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant in that: A. The storage area as approved is being used for seating area. B. Building permits were not obtained for a portion of the construction completed. C. Final building permits and final Certificate of Occupancy have not been obtained for construction that was completed with a permit. D. The bar seating has been increased and the patio enclosure has been removed in violation of the project`plans approved by the Planning Commission. E. The emergency exit only sign leading from the interior court to the door on -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • Palm Drive has not been installed and the door has been left ajar exacerbating the noise nuisance to the residential neighbors to the east. F. Vehicles are being stored in the parking area, and signs have been installed improperly restricting the use of the parking area by customers and employees. 2. The use for which the CUP was granted is being exercised so as to be detrimental to the public health, and safety and constitutes a nuisance in that: A. According to the memorandum from the Police Department there were 45 noise complaints, 2 batteries, 33 security checks, and 16 incidences of minor crimes or rescues between February 1999 and January 2000. B. Numerous residents in the vicinity of the subject property indicated through oral testimony and written correspondence that noise emanating from the restaurant constantly disrupts their comfortable enjoyment of their homes. Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the decision of the Planning Commission to amend the Conditional Use Permit by modifying the Conditions of Approval and adding more Conditions of Approval. PASSED AND APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2000 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California cupr9857appeal -3- 09-03 00 13:38 MARRIC SOFTWA May 3, 2000 INC. RR: Council Meeting of 5/9/00 PLEASE AGEND1Z>7: City Cuuricil 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Reach, CA 90254 Subject: Public Hearing Appeal- Ibiza, 934 Hermosa i\vr: Dear City Cuuncilmcmbcrs, T:310.3-1097 P:01 RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2000 Woh. DEV. DEPT T Nva al 920 Palau Drive, directly behind Ibiza restaurant on the cast side and have so for some '15+ years. 1 am writing to ask that you do not reverse the decision of the Planning Commission's moray aliun of Ibiza's CIJP. This restaurant has repeatedly shown bad faith to the residents as well as to the City. This has been evidenced by the number of times the residents have shown up at City meetings. Your have heard the. complaints ftuira the residents. 1 ask than you review the last Planning commission meeting. Tl has occurred to nuc that one of the major problems which has continuously brings us Iraq: to this hearing stage, is the lack of enforcement of their CUP by Planning Department and the lack of compliance on the part of Ibiza. Whether it was due to lack of personnel or lack of concern; had we had recourse with enforcement we woukl not be at this hearing. What good is a CUP if it docs (rut hold weight to be enforced? \Vhy even bother issuing then].? Nevertheless, here we are.... AGAIN! In the beginning I supported the opening of this restaurant, only opposing- the closing hours. They at rhe time, had kiu,cked on doors to talk with residents regarding the restaurant, attempted to address: concerns, and made promises to he "resident friendly". They urged us to call rheni directly with complaints and not the. City when they opened. Upon trying that, we quickly found out the deception that was perpetrated on us. \Vc. theta found ourselves calling repeatedly to the Planning Dept., only to be told call the. Police Dept, for enforcement. They have violated not only their CI if', but also the verbal promises they made to the local residents, and have been lying aver since. I-rvcn after the revocation hearing, they continue in defiance of the CUI'. 'Their trash area is reeking and has not been cleaned in weeks! The stench is awful. The arca behind on Palm is littered with u.aslr and cigarette butts. The egress door onto .Palm is always ajar and never closed. It has not been fixed to stay closed. These itrirms arc also in viulatiou of their 2^.' Interim Retail Permit issued on January 14, 2000 by the ARC. I ask that you consider al this hcann% the cnfurcement of existing cc,nclilions, as well as the modifications imposed by rhe Planning C:ommissian. '1'lte neve hours as set by the Planning (.;onunlsslon wuuld coincide with the closing hours set by the ABC; Sun •-'l'hurs 11:OOpm, and Fri — Sat '12:00 midnight. Hours, of which they don't abide by anyway. 'I 'his has gone on long enough. 1 low many times do the residents have to coin and state tl'ic facts in order to ger something done?????? 1 ani sick of writing and fighting this CLIP, uk; they have worn me out. My sole. putposc is not to destroy this restaurant, bur to he able to have peaceful enjoyment of my living space. 1 feel enough. dile has been spent wasted trying to baby-sit this place 1nrc, (1.JP compliance. This restaurant c:onunues to defy their CUP and liquor license even in the face. of 920 PAI.M UIZIVP; 11-:1iMOSA 1MACF-I, CA 9025.1 0S-03 00 13:39 MARRIC SOFTW INC. T:3143-1097 P:02 2 rcvocation. Relieve it or not, 1 haw. a Iifc. 0w fate is in your bands. Respectfully yours, • Micki Smallmati Cl k-/akC k•VY Lt., May 3, 2000 05-03 00 13:39 MARRIC SOFTNA INC. i PR -117- 2000 13:2 F pr -ilic/ 1I NLiL' tWU&r-- «V dritt iN 63l INTERIM RETAIL PE1aM-Yf-- bn=Tr'a sn ferable) State of California nfiC tar. (W90) APPLICATION: The undersigned hereby applies for an to be issued in the following name for the premises described bc'iuw: SOUTH SAY HOLDING LLC T: 310.-1097 lu Jr r.ui Dep.,.__.cent of Alcoholic Beverage Control P: 03 . Fee: $100.00 Receipt Number: 1265836 Geo ode: 1924 License Num: 348590 Interim Retail Permit, as described above. Vvv Premises Address: 934 HERMOSA AVE 7 8 0 10 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Type of License(s): 47 - ON -SALE GENERAL EATING PLACE This Interim Retail Permit is a conditional permit and authorizes the .holder to sell alcoholic beverages as would be permitted to be sold under the privileges of the license for which the application has been flle'd with the Department. This permit will expire 120 days from the date of issuance and may be canceled or suspended by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control at any time for good cause. DECLARATION: Should this permit be issued. the undersigned declares that all obligations in connection with the purchase of alcoholic beverages under this Interim Retail Permit will be discharged, and chat all checks issued in payment for alcoholic beverages purchased while holding the Interim Retail permit will be honored au presentation- I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true- and correct. Executed ati 6:t.rt.uecc,.L , California, J PERMIT: The above-named applicant and all engage in the purchase and sale of 7.4044.$ of the Alcoholic Beverage Effective 11j this f, �r f (Applicant's Signature) day of7Co ; a r �! the above-named premises are hereby temporarily permitted to alcoholic beverages, in accordance with the provisions of Se.uon Act as it appears on this perrnit, Control 0to 51idU0 Director of A is 1:3everage :Control 05-03 00 13:40 MARRIC SOFT*, INC. T:341,43-1097 RF'R,-10-2000 13:23 FROM ABC/ 1 NGLEWOOD TO .,:1• • . . DIEirAATMENT oF'Alie`tincsuc 8' , VT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the avfaitttter of the Appli attiio** oft South I olding rt.LC Buceiq 934 Hprmosa Ave 7 3.9 it 1C Heamoi+a Beach, CA 90254 1 • MN 47-348590 P:04 3762287 F. 02 RECEIVED Reg: JAN 1 9 ZOOD 1ITTON FOR CotDITW 1AL Dept of Alcoholic beverage ntrol k I4 EN SE : Inglewood Office Por inns= of att On Sale General Eating Place License Under jig Naoholic Bevetne Cont eel ,Act *pptitiotter(s) baillhave filed an application for the issuente of tine above -referred -to license(s).for the ' • above -toned prem and, , ' pursuant cal Section 23958 oleic Business and Professions Cola; the -Department may deny. an a CLQ for a license where issuance would result in or add to an undue corentralion of licenses: and.. i tete proposed pk'ackag are located in Census Tract 6211.00 wluo ther>r presently exists an undue concertlza oti of licenses -as defined by Section 23958.4 of the 8us93leas and Itrofessidns Code; AOC. petitioner(s) aRti?t e{s) that b)r� teas of the eforemeniiougd oVer conce=tnaz on of ]icenseg. growl Oise for diea�l. of the applied -for license(s), c se(), I wxr lfri► : the proposedpremises and/or packing lot, operated in Oonjtnbu therm* are located. within 100 feet f3; mee(s); 21.0,' W B. issuance of the lied -for iiecase without the below-dcscribed1Cond tions would interfere with the quiet eajelment of the property nearby residents and constitute Bounds for the denial of the application Winder . the psvvisrpna of Rule 61.4, of r 1, Title 4, of the California Code of Rgulations; and, WfERE# S, the iSSUafCC of an unrestricted license would be contrary to pubic: welfare err morals; NOW tt*IiEFQRE, the Uw!crsigaed petitioner(s) do!d es hereby petition ifor a conditional license as follows, too it: 1 {1. ' Sot'b5, tiervice end= on of alcoholic beverages shall be pert hitt d only bctweGn the #2w10 uf: )9;14 A.M. and 11100 P, Sunday • ,.,\e ;12 • • Noon. and 11:00 P.M; Monday through Th.o achy 12 • •. Noonraad 12.00 Midnight rriday 040 am. and 1 `00 Midden Saturday t --- Thar piers shall be maintained as a bons tide food restaurant and shall provide a meuu coor9.ianiE len assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurants. 3. !No "happy hour" rype of ;educed price .. -evexage -1- shall be lillowed v L0 t �pv�:��90 on�tiil Oho, °t 1k\ e`v dod 0,�,ae • • • 05-03 00 13:41 MARRIC SOFTNA• INC. T:310.-1097 P:05 0PR-10-2000 13: 24 FROr1 HIBC/INGLEWUUD TO 3762237 P. 03 45.70t;1101.9414014102 7 - )d$K9 Sonat 01.y�Holdi LLC Pitgt 2• . 4. • ;1114 giiartatly gross sales of alcoholic beveaes shall not excrxxl the guess sales of food during the same period. The licensee shall at all times maintain records which redact separately the gross sate of rood, auto ;tom groan sales of i;ticohoiic beverages of the licensed business. Said records shall be kept no less I tr eiinerltly than on a quarterly. basis and shall be mads available to rile Department on demand. pool or.billiard table tstay he maintained on the premises. . IBn',crtaiuma+t provided shall not be audible beyond the area under the Control of the license (s) as defined !on the ABC -257 dated' 11/ 3/98 and ABC -253 dated 11!13/98. 7. re .half be no live eatertatrnent or dancing permitted on the pnetnii;es at any time, ex eprifor a piano ip1a1yer. 8 ' P��e� �' " ener(s) shall not require an Admission charge or a m ' ate charge, nor Sits: i there bed iegiiirement to pu ase a minimum atunbez of drinks. . 9. 'Th handicap dot*, of the building• complex. leading to the rear alley, §hail be kept!ciosed at 41 rimes du mg the opearatlon of the premises except in cases of emergency aid' zba ingress and og es4 of pttsons uti iz>reg • •the handicap stall. REC) 1VE+ r) JAN 1 9 ZOoo • Dept of Afeciholia !leverage Centro; Inafgee2od Office This patitibac conditional license is made pursuant to the provisiotas of Sections 23800 through 23805 ate Bu;ieres�es d;Ptvfetwionr' Code and will be carried forward in any transfer at Chic applicant-prerniscs; I Petitioner(9) agrees) to reran a copy of this petitions on the premises at all rimes and will be prepared to produce i; kurierrtuaudy upon the r ye uesc of any peace officer. i , The petltldner(s) onderstand(s) that any violation of the foregoing conditionisy shall be grounds for the suspension or revocatiba of Mc liccase(s). i L It , DATE TITrirS , , _ DAY OF 1 kil.kv.\)e i92:1 .. ;it j,i zi. f L f '✓f Applicantatritioner Applicant/Peiiiioncr RECETVF,p. NOV 2 3 1999 01 Alcoholic Q Q�etl:g`= Cert:r)t cep- lnn ev,00d Js.tce MAR.14.2000 10;15AM DZ TV IT 11DTV-R8-03DDATA\HC...4E\00P79131WPDATA'lbiza.doc TO: Community Development Department Planning Division City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley DR. Hermosa Beach CA 90254 FAX: 310-937-6235 SUBJECT: Ibiza Conditional Use Permit Hearing 3/21/2000 NO.410 P.1i1 MAR 1 4 2000 c;om. V vEPr I feel Ibiza's CUP should be revoked because it was based on the facility being used as a restaurant not as a singles bar. They have not behaved like a restaurant but like a singles bar. All operator initiatives to expand the CUP were based on a restaurant operation. If the business were operated as a restaurant the clientele would be eating and talking quietly. There wouldn't be yelling, loud music and no one would be complaining. The noise level is too loud for a restaurant and gets louder as the evening gets later. Ibiza asks for expansion of CUP to accommodate the times that they cater to bar clientele not restaurant clientele. Restaurant patrons are not there until 2AM and don't yell and disturb neighbors. Ibiza wants to extend hours. Since the noise, increases later in the evening this request must be to accommodate the bar clientele not the restaurant clientele. The location is near residential housing. The noise is too loud on weekends now. If the business grows it will be loud every night. Even during the week when neighboring residents have to sleep to work the next day. It is my understanding that Ibiza disputes the Fire Department limit on the number of patron allowed in the facility. This is because Ibiza wants to operate as a singles bar which can accommodate more people since some stand. A restaurant operation requires everyone be seated. Summer will be worse because there will be more people on the patio and they probably move down the stairs in the common area for the other businesses. Neighboring residents will want to have their windows open but the noise will prevent that. Ibiza is operating as a place of entertainment but asking for permission to operate and expand as a restaurant. Ibiza is not being honest about what type of business it intends to conduct. If they really wanted to expand restaurant operations they -would discourage the bar clientele so that people could eat in a quiet environment. Ibiza's current clientele and the noise they create will result in the need for an increased police presence in the area. This results in a burden on the city budget and ultimately additional taxes. This burden will increase in the summer and if the business is allowed to expand it will span more nights of the week. The summer will bring warmer weather and vacationers. Wayne .Harrod 150 Tenth ST #7 Hermosa Beach CA90254 03/14/00 10:10 TX/RX NO.8259 P.001 • • • To: Planning Commission March 14, 2000 City of Hermosa Beach rtv # MAR 1 5 Mil Re: Ibiza Conditional Use Permit Please accept this letter in lieu of my physical presence at the meeting ate. DEV. DEPT will be working out of town on the date of the meeting. As a local resident of the community near Ibiza —131 10th St., I have a continuing concern regarding the licensing of Ibiza. I would like to commend them for their cooperation this past couple of months in keeping their noise level down, as well as the traffic in and out of their back areas. It has substantially decreased. and for that we thank them heartily. However, my biggest concern is the coming summer and the festival times, when the crowds will be so much bigger. I am worried that this is a "temporary fix" to get them through this process, reverting back to the nightmares we had before after their permanent license has been granted. It was so difficult to get them to adhere to the restrictions given them. I would very much like to see the closing hour of 11:00p.m. as part of the conditions of the license. It is a reasonable hour for closure for a "fine dining" establishment. With the number of bars that we have here in Hermosa, we don't need to add a restaurant to the list of late hour establishments. Please help us keep the quality of life here at the Beach high and respectable. We want to participate in bringing in and supporting new business here in Hermosa. Respect for the residents has to go with that as well. Res- , tfully submitted, Grace A. Ortiz March 14, 2000 • 1 ;<w MAR 1 6 2000 UOM. DEV. DEPT RE: Commission Meeting of 3/21/00 — PLEASE AGENDIZE Planning Commission 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Public Hearing - Ibiza, 934 Hermosa Ave Dear Planning Commissioners, I live at 920 Palm Drive, directly behind Ibiza restaurant on the east side and have so for some 15+ years. I am writing to let you know I am in favor of revocation or modification of Ibiza's CUP. This restaurant has repeatedly shown bad faith to the residents as well as to the City. This has been evidenced by the number of times the residents have shown up at City meetings. As the commissioners listening to Ibiza at the meeting of 2/15/00, you heard the complaints from the residents. I ask that you review that last meeting. It has occurred to me that one of the major problems which has brought us to this hearing, is the lack of enforcement of their CUP by Planning Department and the lack of compliance on the part of Ibiza. Whether it was due to lack of personnel or lack of concern; had we had recourse with enforcement we would not be at this hearing. What good is a CUP if it does not hold weight to be enforced? Why even bother issuing them? Nevertheless, here we are.... two years later.. In the beginning I supported the opening of this restaurant, only opposing the closing hours. They at the time, had knocked on doors to talk with residents regarding the restaurant, attempted to address concerns, and made promises to be "resident friendly". They urged us to call them directly with complaints and not the City when they opened. Upon trying that, we quickly found out the deception that was perpetrated on us. We then found ourselves calling repeatedly to the Planning Dept., only to be told call the Police Dept. for enforcement. They have violated not only their CUP, but also the verbal promises they made to the local residents, and have been lying ever since. I ask that you consider at the hearing the enforcement of existing conditions, as well as any modifications: 1.) Cutting the hours back to 11pm daily; to stay in line with other restaurants abutting residential neighborhoods in the same area. Alternatively, just revoke the CUP. 2.) Require that NO music be heard outside the restaurant at all. Their CUP already says this. Nevertheless, they admitted to speakers throughout. The attached flyer that was• submitted when they first applied states "...eclectic selection of background music that adds overall dining experience while never dominating any of our dining rooms." Very misleading. Alternatively, just revoke the CUP. 3.) Require that the patio cover be re -installed to keep patron sounds in the restaurant. There was a reason the previous tenant covered this area — NOISE! Alternatively, just revoke the CUP. 4.) Require that the door leading to Palm Drive, which has never worked or been properly signed, be sealed up permanently. The idea was that this door was to be used for handicap access, but since there is no place or way for handicapped persons to reach this door, it defeats the purpose. 920 PALM DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 • • — 2 — March 14, 2000 I suggest that the front steps leading to the restaurant be made partially into a handicap access ramp. This may even meet some ADA requirements. 5.) Require no deliveries after 5pm. The above could take care of the delivery problems all together, as they would be forced to deliver on Hermosa Avenue. Mr. Marrone stated that there,. was a doorman at the backdoor to Palm Drive where the "supposed Emergency Only" sign is, gee... I have never seen this person. An omission of truth? Oh, and Mr. Marrone stated he didn't know that the same door (which is used exclusively for his deliveries through out the day and night) was broken. Hmmm? Alternatively, just revoke the CUP. 6.) Require that the garbage areas be cleaned regularly, and that the owners been shown how to do this without pushing their waste into the city streets. This area stinks, and the back by the garbage area is unclean and unsanitary. Cigarette butts, trash and waste from the trash area is piling up on the street back there. It should be required that they regularly clean by the garbage area outside. Maybe they owners could pay to unclog the drainage plug in their trash area, to properly dispose of their wastewater. Isn't it illegal to put it into the streets??? Alternatively, just revoke the CUP. 7.) Require special approval by City of "renting out of restaurant" prior to occurrence. I was concerned with the remarks made by Mr. Mark Marrone at the Planning Commission meeting of 2/15/00, regarding the "renting out of his restaurant" to someone. I feel this is an issue that must be addtessedat this hearing, in addition to the rest of the matters. I am concerned that this possibly not only violates his CUP, but the ABC license he holds. Is he a restaurant or a banquet -facility? Do his uses or conditions change? Have we been misled as to the intentions of this restaurant facility? Well I have gone on long enough. I am sick of writing and fighting this CUP, ok; they have worn me out. My sole purpose is not to destroy this restaurant, but to be able to have peaceful enjoyment of my living space. I feel enough time has been spent wasted trying to baby-sit this place into CUP compliance. This restaurant continues to defy their CUP even in the face of revocation. I hope that by providing alternatives to revocation we can come to some terms with this restaurant. Believe it or not, I have a life. Our fate is in your hands. Respectfully yours, Micki Smallman��-C BARCELONA Rs -to ra r)f4 Cuisine: We feature a wide selection of high-quality Spanish Tapas and regional dishes of the Mediterranean. Specialty Dishes: A fine assortment of hot and cold Tapas. Catalonia Paella, Menorcan Lobster Stew, and Grilled Beef Loin with Eggplant Caviar are but a few of our exotic specialties. Ambience: A warm, comfortable setting reminiscent of Old World Spain adorned with an laborate combination of wood, stone, metal and white -washed walls. Our restaurant features three distinctive rooms containing an impressive collection of kiln -dried pottery and decorative arts imported from the Balearic Islands. The relaxed surroundings are enhanced by an eclectic selection of background music that adds to the overall • mng experience while never dominating any of our dining rooms. Service: Our full-service restaurant provides residents with a refreshing alternative to the "standing room only" approach of many competing establishments. Our wait staff will be well trained in presenting our unique menu by describing the origin, character and taste of each dish, while always making helpful suggestions regarding food, wine, and drink selection. Dining will always be available until closing thus providing a much needed alternative to the current late- night dining choices in downtown Hermosa Beach (Paisano's Pizza & Zeppy's Pizza). Management: Pacific Foods is a small, closely held restaurant management company that currently operates responsible eating and drinking establishments in Seattle, WA. Our General Manager for the 934 Hermosa Ave location has over twenty years of fine -dining restaurant management experience. Special Features: • Restaurant design by David Coleman, listed in 1991 by Architectural Digest as one of the 100 foremost architects in the world. • Menu refinement by award-winning chef Leonard Schwartz of the renowned Maple Drive restaurant in Beverly Hills and 72 Market St. in Venice, Ca. • Reservations accepted. • Seating after 10 p.m is available. 934 Hermosa Ave Hermosa Beach CA 90254 • • South Bay Holding, LLC Dear Hermosa Residents, We at South Bay Holding are looking forward to bringing the authentic taste of Spain to your community. Our restaurant will be named Barcelona and will open sometime in early 1999. The principals of our company live here in Hermosa Beach and want to be responsible members of this community. In that regard, one of the goals of our company is to be a[resident "friendly" establishment] Simply stated, we want to hear about any problems you have. If we can help, we will. Our managers are Eesponsible and very experienced in the restaurant industry and are being informed that the needs of area residents are as important to making our restaurant successful as the food and service is. So, please feel free to call us with any questions or comments you have. We hope to see you in January when we open. In the meantime, have a great holiday season. Sincerely, Kevin Wall 934 Hermosa Ave. Hermosa Beach CA. 90254 800-979-9405 g • • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) APPEAL 934 HERMOSA. AVENUE RE: CONCERNS OF PALMI DRIVE RESIDENTS Dear City Council, I have personally, spoken with the principals for the new restaurant to be located at 934 Hermosa Avenue, who have thoroughly explained the proposed Tapas concept for Barcelona Ristorante. I understand the principals are requesting the Hermosa City Council affirm the Planning Commission's decision to amend the existing CUP to allow food and drink to be served until 2 a.m. I also understand the principals are requesting a full liquor license. I am fully aware of the issues and problems that arose from the previous tenant, Cal Beach Sushi, and 1 have discussed these problems with the principals. 1 am satisfied with the proposed measures to eliminate unwanted traffic and noise on Palm Drive. Notes: Thank You, C ks5C: tn3 (.tri oc, hon -,-es) _@\/ Lcoc ld c\b:k d e b.f CU o f ..t- YZ\ -to be. g�ci Name Date Address oc-r\ to nne. by Kevtin -\-00 him pD1'i� .\'1 L czoldnt 5-kor , Members of the Planning Commission 3/14/2000 Regarding Ibiza Restaurant My husband & I will not be able to attend the meeting on March 21, 2000, regarding the Conditional Use Permit of Ibiza restaurant. I have spoken at the other meetings about the noise from the music that comes into our bedroom at night. The music has toned down since the last meeting, but we are afraid this will not last. With summer coming we feel they are just trying to be good neighbors for the time being & then we will be back where we started. We feel they waited to long to be good neighbors. We would like there hours of operation changed to end at 11: p.m. on Thurs, Fri. & Sat. nights. We still hear the ice being delivered at 10:p.m. at night. They are still dropping the sacks of ice on to the strbet from the back of the van. They have not changed this part of the operation as of yet. We would like to see this matter come back for review again in six months & then see if the changes have lasted. Thank you for taking this matter serious. Respectfully, Lois Heintz 925 Manhattan Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254. E. 1v MAR 1 6 2000 (MM. DEV. DEPT • • 211 .w»•aaa'rR''Sr' }.vl1'1 j f Sw' +i "•'.4 lis, j. .' y � .+.c.r v's:YRA'^— � ,uum?7 .... 87n''+'��.dr��. "i ti.P}kYbi': rAtf (__ ".n �4 M+.i, 1.y �NA.y t, ti r=■d-.,..�.�h�aN ',NF -`•. i u 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1-6 17 1.8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robert M. Tessier SBN 126415 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT M. TESSIER, P.C. 15915 Ventura Boulevard, Ste. 201 Encino, California 91436 (818) 783-2695 Attorneys for South Bay Holding, LLC IN THE MATTER OF A RESOLUTION OF ) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CA (PC ) RESOLUTION 98-57) RE CONDITIONAL USE ) PERMIT: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) South Bay Holding, LLC 934 Hermosa Avenue, Units 7-10 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NOTICE OF APPEAL; MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW; EVIDENCE. AND EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT THEREOF TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNSEL, AND THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that South Bay Holding, LLC (hereinafter "South Bay") hereby appeals the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission re: Revocation/Modification to Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 98-57 made following the Regular Meeting of March 21, 2000 This appeal will be based upon pertinent parts of the record on file herein, as well as such additional evidence submitted in support of this appeal, and argument and oral evidence as may be permitted. DATED: April 5, 2000 DATED: April 5, 2000 all, g , Bay Holdings, LLC ana er South LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT M. TESSIER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ROBERT M. TESSIER, Attorneys for South Bay Holdings, LLC -1- (J4 X05; 00 15:15 FAX 8995 10665 HELLER LAW OFCS MGM YTESS50886ao1coa3 Hermosa Beach City Counsel Hermosa Beach CA Law Offices of ROBERT M. TESSIER, A Professional Corporation woo Roam BLFA. Sum aZz cacao, MOIRA $1418 April 6, 2000 Re: South Bay Holdings, LLC Appeal from decision of Planning Commission Dear Member of the City Counsel • (818) 7E34S5 MI 6 [tfi002 iCEIVEn irt A P R n R 2000 MY YCLERK CITY OF HERMOS 1 BEACHNINO In conjunction with the formal Notice of Appeal filed today in connection with the above referenced matter, Ibiza management wishes to attach this letter to the record, and be afforded the opportunity to present documentary evidence supporting its position in support of its appeal, and to be afforded a hearing on the issue. Ibiza wishes to provide evidence in its possession which challenges several of the factual assumptions made by the Planning Commission, and which establishes that many of the concerns expressed by the Commission have been satisfactorily remedied. In order to address the issues raised by the Commission, management acted quickly and decisively. Management feels confident that their actions will help to ensure full compliance with its CUP, and satisfy the legitimate concerns of its neighbors in future. Ibiza acknowledges that there has been a long-standing issue concerning noise. Some complaints have been well founded and remedied as discussed below. Others have come from one particular neighbor of Ibiza who has publicly stated that it is her "life's mission" to try to put Ibiza out of business. Her complaints have not been limited to Ibiza; she has also complained about issues that are beyond the scope of Ibiza's capacity to remedy. Moreover, a substantial number of noise complaints were listed as "unfounded" by Hermosa Beach Police when they investigated. Be that as it may, Ibiza recognizes that noise is the principal issue. Ibiza strongly desires to be a good neighbor and comply with all reasonable regulations. In order to remedy the noise issue, steps have been, and are being taken to satisfy all concerned. The steps that have been takenare as follows: 1. Music has been softened throughout the restaurant, and off entirely; in the easternmost area of the restaurant; 2.. The cleaning crew does not come in the evening, but rather the following morning. 04/C)6/00 15:16 FAX 8141105 0668 HELLER LAW OFCS • 11pj,003 This has virtually eliminated that problem with noise in the enclosed dumpster area caused by Ibiza. (It should be noted that the dumpsters are used by all tenants -including another restaurant in the area) 3. With fire department agreement, the door which allows access from the plaza area of the premises to Nam Drive has been locked shut. This was a common means of ingress/egress used by Palm Drive residents to reach Hermosa Ave. This shortcut is now eliminated, and with it, the occasional noise that would escape out onto Palm Drive; 4. Staff has been instructed by management to take prompt and reasonable action to reduce noise coming from any one or group of patrons whose noise level is not fitting with the decorum of the restaurant; 5. Ibiza's vendors have been advised that no deliveries to Ibiza are permitted on Palm Drive in order to minimize disturbance to Ibiza's neighbors. The following are steps which are to be taken within the next two weeks to determine if there is a substantial reduction in noise: 1. A removable cover for the patio will be used after 10:00 p.m. in an attempt to reduce noise emanating from that area; 2. Patrons waiting to get into the restaurant will be kept on Hermosa Ave., (west of the restaurant) rather than being allowed to loiter in the plaza area. Since there have been no complaints coming from the west of Ibiza, and all complainants are east of Ibiza, it is hoped that there will be a significant reduction of complaints; 3. Noise measurements will be made to determine the effectiveness of these changes; 4. Signs will be placed on Palm Drive reminding drivers that no trucks are to park there to make deliveries to Ibiza. Management believes that, in combination, all of these steps will adequately address the issues raised by all those concerned. Management has been active in local meetings, and has been responsive to all inquiry. Even neighbors who had previously been concerned about noise have publicly commented that the situation is much improved. Lastly, management wishes to continue to fully cooperate to successfully address and take all reasonable means to forge, at the very least, a peaceful coexistence with Ibiza's neighbors. 01 06/ 00 15:17 FAX 1995 0668 HELLER LAR 0FC111 For these reasons, Ibiza respectfully requests that it be permitted to submit evidence to the City Council for its review, and that contrary to the Planning Commission's suggestion, requests that no changes be made to Ibiza's CUP at this time Very truly yours. LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT M. TESSIER OFESSIOI L CORPORATION ROBERT M. TESSIER RMT/dmt Z 004 • , • • • • EMAIL: RTESS5000@aolcom • Law Offionaof • • . goBEwrg: TE,SSIEll. • . •• • ,• • , A Professional Corporation • • • • • sarE 322 • • • ENtINO, OthORNIA 914p8 May 4, 2000,: VIA HAND DELIVEkY • • otecetvto. MAY 0 4 2000' • .. , .., . ubittDEV.DEPT.': . • . • . „ . • • • . . 'City of Hermosa Beach •- • Community bevelopment Dept. 1315 Valley Drive, Room 103 Hermosa Beach, • . ."' ' , . Re Appeal - 'Appeal of the-Plannirig-CoMiniSsion' clecision-on March'21, 2000, amending • • • :ConditiOnal UsePermitP.C-; Resolution 9857 and C.C. Resolution 98-5939;, permitting on -sale general alcohol and Specified hours of operation for, Ibiza Restaurant; Located at 934 Hermosa Ave.', andlegallY described as'Lot,27-30, TraetNo.1564 .• • ' - ' . - , - • pursuant to the April 10'; 2000 letter from Nan= Valdesyand inanticipation of Public • . before,, , Hearing Scheduled the City Council May -9, 2000, Ibiza Restaurant hereby submits written materials and evidence Please note that, separately, additional materials in the form of appro\i,ed trawings, and photographs, and other material will be delivered today.. .'• • . , . . - • •, • It is also requestedthat acOpY.of the attached letter be made part. Ofthe record. availableto.,the 'City Council, if.nOt.dOne:,sei already::. ' ' . • Very. truly urs,, , • " . ••C• AW A ROFBSSIONAL CORPORATION . „ AQBER. RMT/dmt • EMAIL RTESS5000@aolcom Hermosa Beach City Counsel Hermosa Beach CA Law Offices of ROBERT M. TESSIER A Professional Corporation 16830 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 322 ENCINO, CALIFORNIA 91436 April 6, 2000 Re: South Bay Holdings, LLC Appeal from decision of Planning Commission Dear Member of the City Counsel • (818)783.2695 FAX (818) 501.1036 In conjunction with the formal Notice of Appeal filed today in connection with the above referenced matter, Ibiza management wishes to attach this letter to the record, and be afforded the opportunity to present documentary evidence supporting its position in support of its appeal, and to be afforded a hearing on the issue. Ibiza wishes to provide evidence in its possession which challenges several of the factual assumptions made by the Planning Commission, and which establishes that many of the concerns expressed by the Commission have been satisfactorily remedied. In order to address the issues raised by the Commission, management acted quickly and decisively. Management feels confident that their actions will help to ensure full compliance with its CUP, and satisfy the legitimate concerns of its neighbors in future. Ibiza acknowledges that there has been a long-standing issue concerning noise. Some complaints have been well founded and remedied as discussed below. Others have come from one particular neighbor of Ibiza who has publicly stated that it is her "life's mission" to try to put Ibiza out of business. Her complaints have not been limited to Ibiza; she has also complained about issues that are beyond the scope of Ibiza's capacity to remedy. Moreover, a substantial number of noise complaints were listed as "unfounded" by Hermosa Beach Police when they investigated. Be that as it may, Ibiza recognizes that noise is the principal issue. Ibiza strongly desires to be a good neighbor and comply with all reasonable regulations. In order to remedy the noise issue, steps have been, and are being taken to satisfy all concerned. The steps that have been taken are as follows: 1. Music has been softened throughout the restaurant, and off entirely in the easternmost area of the restaurant; 2. The cleaning crew does not come in the evening, but rather the following morning. • • This has virtually eliminated that problem with noise in the enclosed dumpster area caused by Ibiza. (It should be noted that the dumpsters are used by all tenants -including another restaurant in the area) 3. With fire department agreement, the door which allows access from the plaza area of the premises to Plam Drive has been locked shut. This was a common means of ingress/egress used by Palm Drive residents to reach Hermosa Ave. This shortcut is now eliminated, and with it, the occasional noise that would escape out onto Palm Drive; 4. Staff has been instructed by management to' take prompt and reasonable action to reduce noise coming from any one or group of patrons whose noise level is not fitting with the decorum of the restaurant; 5. Ibiza's vendors have been advised that no deliveries to Ibiza are permitted on Palm Drive in order to minimize disturbance to Ibiza's neighbors. The following are steps which are to be taken within the next two weeks to determine if there is a substantial reduction in noise: 1. A removable cover for the patio will be used after 10:00 p.m. in an attempt to reduce noise emanating from that area; 2. Patrons waiting to get into the restaurant will be kept on Hermosa Ave., (west of the restaurant) rather than being allowed to loiter in the plaza area. Since there have been no complaints coming from the west of Ibiza, and all complainants are east of Ibiza, it is hoped that there will be a significant reduction of complaints; 3. Noise measurements will be made to determine the effectiveness of these changes; 4. Signs will be placed on Palm Drive reminding drivers that no trucks are to park there to make deliveries to Ibiza. Management believes that, in combination, all of these steps will adequately address the issues raised by all those concerned. Management has been active in local meetings, and has been responsive to all inquiry. Even neighbors who had previously been concerned about noise have publicly commented that the situation is much improved. Lastly, management wishes to continue to fully cooperate to successfully address and take all reasonable means to forge, at the very least, a peaceful coexistence with Ibiza's neighbors. For these reasons, Ibiza respectfully requests that it be permitted to submit evidence to the City Council for its review, and that contrary to the Planning Commission's suggestion, requests that no changes be made to Ibiza's CUP at this time Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT M. TESSIER OFESSIOI L CORPORATION ROBERT M. TESSIER RMT/dmt • • To- Whom-lt-May Concern: RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2000 c OM. DEV. DEPT aver the Past Sri months wel acre:nzade.a„nxuuber•ofclanges-tha -have lead -to a -drastic reduction in any ise-prablem-that existed -between -IBIZA and -our -surrounding neighbors. Some -of the changes include: Deliveries are no longer acceptedl- o� ive. Re-movardrarsubwoofers iii -the-xestawant. Managers are constantly checking the noise situation- on Palm Drive and Hermosa -Ave. Any lines arequeued on Hermosa ave.,_therewby eliminating anygathering in the courtyard area. And -most importantly, the new management -and all pf our -employees have made -a used effort to completely eliminate any problems -that -exist_ with otrr-neighj ors. In closing, despite the efforts ofa:neighbor who -told .:us.one: r=ar-ago and prior to our opening that it is "her life's -mission to close us -down" there-haveanly=been very few calls to the police regarding noise inthe past .six ..months. .In_otherwords; the steps that -we -have already -taken -are working.: We �. are. asking the. City Council to =allow us to -continue operating- t -as is" since any- additional -changes to our hours of operation will certainly mean -the death of -our business. lhank-you-for your consideration, evin Wall Owner T 1ZA 934Meanosa Ave. 3W -318-912Y SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION i IN07:003 iERMOSA • CAD Address Inquiry WED, MAY 3, 2000, 5:11 PM ddress: 934 HERMOSA AV agency: P Dates: 120199/050300 )ate Time Type NOI Types: 415 Dispo 410 PAGE: 1 RC/DI DI/AS AS/CC Incident 342200 0001 415 LOUD PEOPLE 342100 2330 415 LOUD MUSIC 340100 2157 415 DISTURBANCE 330200 1435 415 DISTURBANCE 030200 1435 415 DISTURBANCE 021300 0049 415 DISTURBANCE 021300 0029 415 LOUD MUSIC 021300 0015 415 LOUD MUSIC 011500 0011 415 LOUD MUSIC 010800 0027 415 LOUD MUSIC 121999 0047 415 LOUD DRUMS 121899 2320 415 LOUD MUSIC 121299 2127 415 DISTURBANCE 120499 2351 415 DRUMS 120499 2308 415 MUSIC 120399 2312 415 MUSIC HBO.. UNFo SEC RPT 1 CAN ADV HBO ADV ADV HBO UTL '\ UNF ' HBO UNF 1- UNF HBO 00:07 08:20 01:04 0HB0006721 00:06 06J3 05:53 0HB0006719 00:00 00:00 00:43 OHB0005537 00:10 04:08 56:42 OHB0003617 OHB0003616 00:00 00:00 04:39 OHB0002610 00:18 03:56 03:32 OHB0002607 00:55 04:49 02:51 0HB0002604 00:09 00:53 07:38 0HB0000822 01:3d 06:41 09:00 OHB0000428 00:14 04:06 03:16 9HB0022131 00:07 06:44 03:35 9HB0022125 00:06 04:05 02:38 9HB0021753 00:28 03:53 00:52 9HB0021256 02:12 04:16 01:51 9HB0021249 00:05 03:14 05:43 9HB0021168 I ( 0/1 a I I 6-411-5 riAcedi( 1,417,a ,s, payl- "WA, a /14 4)2- akfal 9 4 c� (lf or (--,1(5/01-er04,( fin c(i-/-70(1,5 5ceJ 5'Cwz lJ aeL, A-1) l & nc,neuzi the of 14/ww11101, 111 owe* otto •••••• a so more fore.. MI 1. tt. ott1 =11...././1•11,11** to. •• Occupant LoadS:-IExits Rea For all spaces 2 including storage; restroams end outdoor terrace, occupant load =221 EQLJIPMENT SCHEDULE 11....'", D. SS UM: II/0.1 / i t 9- mull 1111 12117-1T;117..t I 1.1 EN ;ft+ comi I...um La...it i t : : r ...sr nr, . i,, I- I-- 4-A!Bv.,•• mo.I.Ei'.0.41, - • • ' I I i .•••••,,,, . • 1 • " • I • . • I 4- , . .. 4---!---F...--.-,7,-;,.--.----- ; -... • --: —1-777.7...7- ' _ I. . : • ; X LX ,73' _i_..1___il..11..,_,,..1-__ —1 — : r. • .,,, . ., : 1- ittllp rut, . Xif=" ' ' • Tit.; s–.7..,-;,...‘1-.7.--. — . t ma. • —r, um", _J2< ra i 07i- I •""'': 716e- Ottirts twe- vigova b7 s Hefe"05a leach gefir,054 oveci /71"4'11 Legend cm= New Walls =:= Existing Walls = = Walls To Be Demolished i; . . r, r ! 1 1 1 ! 1! ,_._, ._.,.,7, ,._, ..,.. , i TA-,_,._... , ral•t4.. •, , LS' ; • :1 ,• • , p=. I T 1 fl LJ LI;1' • irt rtr2c.:‘,43 rfl )4: frt. Li IC.11,5•-• 1IN =17 oj '11 n ! .1, • 1 E" n 1-1 tifi -r • N•7. g..;) 1::r fz,77 _ ere) 1,tttc..... Ott, .31 ; • t. t. .0..t • 1•4 • ;rt -J. 4-.111 I . I 'er 17'2 D 1 ) n (-) -/ /;ninq ,--)n " • ' •.s.•„Y • _ p- u 12141 , ••• • '—'°'" , o irk-. a-- 7-7 y I 11 r Dthing B,a0 • ; 1; • , ' 11 • 1 ; I !-- -4- Not a Pa.! 1 _3 ,HV 1 ; ; • / SbieSgS sting Garbage qot Por t. Storage ;thi_••-•• P-epackaged Ort,• p 11(1,46 Free ROC;i11 /V. •171; ;KT. Nem& • v. - •=1:t • 4 •: • I ' Wik- Cooler To (I) • an.(Is, / • :,--q;Yrt`'.• 'Yemen's ! „ Stereos I Pr(y.kilgtkl Ority / I it Note: Provide o sort over moirt etiterior exit door 'THIS DOOR MUST REMA I•1 UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS- APPROVEil !SY 0.1.4 A u-, 0 a, • L' <0 c.q o w c u, L's .... t E RI -d• 'Col 2 Fi°7;Fein --1 I ,---t—k-i-, ...,.!, :,- -, 1 _ , ;2 1 __i_u_t_t_._. ' V-1-4-2474 —;,•••=,.=,,, '. -,n,; ix. ,• .. twn ;x ix , .,—; 1 r, i SIalr I t,•• I 11,011 : ---.. —,--- ' ' ' -- 0 1 •=, 11. _ _ ,_1211 •Itt. • ..,-.:-••••• ... . , ..-..., ..... •„..., T -A -1-7..,s-7,-,......, I.,- --- L2•,...;L__;_ _ 1—•-•:I— /• . 1 1 .. . : X ' X 1.•/' • I ---•-,•-••--I--•--t-1-.-4-.• _.--I----L--1-- -1.-4-- I X I. X h.:. I 1 1141111111 I ... ,mu, ,.." •••11-a,-_•,1._ __ ,...-....,r.rr -i.:12-;,,4•14,,—.6.- ---- --,7atmr• 1:47.1.,•=7 Ii r. ! 1 ••. i T-1--- ----- • x )-(-1, „ ; ; , - , - —1-• -71.1171•1•11111.11111,17. I L . I I t 1..1 1...._ -7 - I I 1 —1-- -H---- - -1wzr. ,r•-- 7---1"---!--*--1--i----1-rk-r.nrws• „ ; ; : • on-rw.r..3 zi I ..••=. I'L' '. I X ' '" . . ._._ 2'2-- — —i•___, i_.__L...4.• ' 1.11 I . 1 ...________. 1 ,• • , p=. I T 1 fl LJ LI;1' • irt rtr2c.:‘,43 rfl )4: frt. Li IC.11,5•-• 1IN =17 oj '11 n ! .1, • 1 E" n 1-1 tifi -r • N•7. g..;) 1::r fz,77 _ ere) 1,tttc..... Ott, .31 ; • t. t. .0..t • 1•4 • ;rt -J. 4-.111 I . I 'er 17'2 D 1 ) n (-) -/ /;ninq ,--)n " • ' •.s.•„Y • _ p- u 12141 , ••• • '—'°'" , o irk-. a-- 7-7 y I 11 r Dthing B,a0 • ; 1; • , ' 11 • 1 ; I !-- -4- Not a Pa.! 1 _3 ,HV 1 ; ; • / SbieSgS sting Garbage qot Por t. Storage ;thi_••-•• P-epackaged Ort,• p 11(1,46 Free ROC;i11 /V. •171; ;KT. Nem& • v. - •=1:t • 4 •: • I ' Wik- Cooler To (I) • an.(Is, / • :,--q;Yrt`'.• 'Yemen's ! „ Stereos I Pr(y.kilgtkl Ority / I it Note: Provide o sort over moirt etiterior exit door 'THIS DOOR MUST REMA I•1 UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS- APPROVEil !SY 0.1.4 A u-, 0 a, • L' <0 c.q o w c u, L's .... t E RI -d• 'Col 2 Fi°7;Fein 1 . -11 � , / ' ~ .. ^ Fiermorl- /WC, \\\\\N N N li nt Dq ti .S47,rat 'Cr CErolia nce uRE C OMMENDED • INSTALL SOLID CORE DOORS P\dza. Coof\--Vcr 5e4 Alff; :71 i99q • unaz partk, SF Lo, 753 = 56 hr IFErstp &7i 55 718 11.3 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION May 8, 2000 OUTSTANDING BUILDING, ZONING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS IBIZA RESTAURANT 934 HERMOSA AVENUE BUILDING CODE VIOLATIONS • No building permit for converting garages into floor area. • No electrical permit for wiring for garages converted to floor area. • Installed removable patio cover without building permit (or Fire Department approval). • The electrical room is not permitted to be used for storage. • The electrical cords on the roof are for temporary interior use only. • The holes in the garage ceiling need to be sealed for fire stop. • Unused electrical conduit and electrical boxes must be covered. • The floor sinks are not vented. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT VIOLATIONS • Converted storage area into lounge area with additional seating. • Speakers in the outdoor area. • Sign on door leading to Palm Drive should be posted "Emergency Exit Only" and the door must be solid core. • Trash area not being cleaned at regular intervals to control odors. PARKING PLAN VIOLATIONS • Posted restricted parking signs not in compliance with Conditions of Approval. • Using required parking space for vehicle storage. ZONING CODE VIOLATIONS • Restricted parking from common and/or shared use by patrons and employees of all the businesses in the complex (violation of approved Parking Plan also). SUPPLEid;EN fAL INFORMATION • Reducing required parking with vehicle storage. MUNICIIAL CODE VIOLATIONS • Discharging water and debris from trash facility into alley (Palm Drive • Excessive noise/music causing a public nuisance. ITEMS ON APPEAL TO COMPLETE • Reduce the hours of operation to 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. daily, except the outdoor patio area which shall be closed at 9:00 P.M. daily. Stop seating patrons after 8:30 P.M. and stop service to patrons at 9:00 P.M. • Obtain building and electrical permits for all areas converted from parking spaces to floor area. • Construct vestibule at the court yard entrance to the restaurant and eliminate entrance/exit at other locations. • Install Solid core door(s) between the approved storage area and the seating area, and keep closed during operating hours. • Install on both doors on the Palm Drive side, signs stating "Emergency Exit Only", and panic hardware with an alarm on each door. • Submit a revised floor plan and seating plan correctly showing the location and layout of bar and table seating and the maximum occupant load. • Remove chairs, couches, tables, audio systems, speakers and similar items from area designated for storage, including storage of these items. • Lock door to the trash storage area and only open for the purpose of allowing the trash collector to remove the trash. • Install a floor drain with a trap primer in trash facility area. Ibizaviolations Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 4, 2000 Regu$ar Meeting of May 9, 2000 SUBJECT: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM PURPOSE: TO COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT AND OBTAIN LOCAL PERMIT AUTHORITY, INCLUDING AMENDING THE POLICIES IN THE CITY'S CERTIFIED COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AND ADOPTION OF AN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE Recommendations 1. To approve the attached resolution to amend the City's Certified Coastal Land Use Plan. 2. To introduce the attached Ordinance as an amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance to implement the Local Coastal Program 3. To adopt the attached resolution authorizing submittal of a Local Coastal Program to the Coastal Commission. Background The Planning Commission has held two public hearings on this matter: including an informational meeting on March 21, 2000, and a special meeting on April 5, 2000 to make their final recommendation. 11,000 informational brochures and public notices were mailed on March 13, 2000 to all residents and commercial uses within the City regarding the hearings. The draft documents have been revised based upon input from the hearings, City Attorney review, and comments from the Coastal Commission Staff. Executive Summary Portions of the City of Hermosa Beach are within California's Coastal Zone and are therefore subject to the California Coastal Act. The goal of the Coastal Act is to protect California's - coastal resources for the use and enjoyment of future generations. In order to accomplish this goal, the Coastal Act requires that certain policies and actions be followed in the Coastal Zone. The Coastal Act also granted the State the authority to regulate development and uses in the Coastal Zone. The State maintains this authority until such time as the City or jurisdiction enters into a contract with the State and incorporates the goals of the Coastal Act into local regulations. In Hermosa Beach, the State still retains the authority to regulate and issue permits for development in the Coastal Zone. Staff has been working with a consultant (The Planning Center) and the Coastal Commission to obtain permit authority the Coastal Zone. In order to obtain this authority, the City must complete its Local Coastal Program. The Local Coastal Program is the contract between the City and the State specifying how the City will protect California's coastal resources. The Local Coastal Program consists of two documents: 1) the Land Use Plan, and 2) Implementing Ordinances, and associated maps. California Coastal Act The California Coastal Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 30000 et seq) was enacted by the State Legislature in 1976 to provide long-term protection of California's • • May 4, 2000 Page 2 of 4 coastline. The Coastal Act contains policies that address public access to the coast, coastal recreation, the marine environment, coastal land resources, and coastal development of various types, including energy facilities, ports, and other industrial development. Jurisdictions within a certain distance of the coast, called the Coastal Zone, are subjected to these policies. The Coastal Act grants the State the authority to permit development within the Coastal Zone until such time as local jurisdictions complete, and the Coastal Commission certifies, a Local Coastal Program The Coastal Zone stretches along the length of California's coast and includes approximately 287 miles of shoreline and 9 offshore islands. The Coastal Zone encompasses some 1.5 million acres of the mainland and reaches from 3 miles at sea to an inland boundary that varies from a few blocks in the more urban areas to as far as 5 miles inland in other areas. In Hermosa Beach, the Coastal Zone extends inland (east) from the beach as shown on the attached map. The Coastal Zone is divided into two areas, the Appealable and Non -Appealable areas. These areas determine the extent of the ability to appeal a development application to the Coastal Commission. Local Coastal Program The Coastal Act outlines a partnership between the State and local government to manage the conservation and development of coastal resources. The City's portion of this partnership is described in a document called the Local Coastal Program. The Local Coastal Program incorporates the goals and policies of the Coastal Act into the City's regulations and identifies the location, type, densities and development standards for future development in the Coastal Zone. The Local Coastal Program includes two documents: • Land Use Plan (LUP), a portion of the local general plan pertaining to the Coastal Zone. • Implementing Ordinance, the zoning ordinance and maps necessary to implement the land use plan. Hermosa Beach has completed the first step in the process of completing the Local Coastal Program. In 1981, the City's Land Use Plan was certified by the California Coastal Commission. The City must now complete the second step of the process to obtain the permitting authority in certain portions of the Coastal Zone. Local Permitting After a Local Coastal Program has been approved, the Coastal Commission's permitting authority over most new development will be transferred to the City of Hermosa Beach. This will increase convenience and shorten processing time for local property owners and developers to obtain permits. However, the Coastal Commission will still retain authority over development proposed in the Original Permit Jurisdictipn (beach, tidelands, submerged lands, and public trust lands). The Coastal Commission will also retain the authority to: • Hear appeals of the City's coastal permit decisions, • Review and approve any amendments to certified Local Coastal Program, and • Review the Local Coastal Program at least every five years to ensure proper implementation and continued compliance with the Coastal Act. • • May 4, 2000 Page3of4 What types of development require a Coastal Development Permit? A Coastal Development Permit is currently required for development in the Coastal Zone that results in any change: • In the density or intensity of use of land, including subdivisions, or • In the intensity of use of water, or • Access to the coast. The following types of development are exempt from coastal permitting requirements: • Most repairs and improvements to single-family homes, • Certain types of development subject to Categorical Exclusions, such as projects consistent with the zoning ordinance, • Certain temporary events, • The replacement of any structure destroyed by natural disaster, and • Development that involves does not involve the risk of adverse environmental effects. How are coastal development permits obtained? Currently, Any person seeking to undertake applicable development in the Coastal Zone must obtain permits from the Coastal Commission's Local District Office in Long Beach. However, after certification of the Local Coastal Program, permits may be obtained from the City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department. This will make the permit process more convenient, and in most cases speed up the process. How will Hermosa Beach's new Ordinance Work? All properties within the Coastal Zone (See Map) will be assigned the Coastal Zone (CZ) overlay in addition to their existing zoning designation. For instance, if your property is currently zoned for One -Family Residential (R-1), it will now be zoned One -Family Residential — Coastal Zone (R -1 -CZ). This new Coastal Zone overlay zone will not change the underlying zoning designation but will add the coastal permit processing requirements to these areas. Future development or improvements in the Coastal Zone will then be required to comply with the policies of the Coastal Act and CZ overlay zone. Next Steps? The City of Hermosa Beach is preparing to submit an application to certify the Implementing Plan portion of their Local Coastal Program along with accompanying amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan (LUP). Prior to this, the City Council must adopt the ordinance and a resolution transmitting the package of documents and maps which constitute the LCP to the Coastal Commission for certification. The following material is provided in your City Council package: • LUP and Existing Implementation Measures Consistency Analysis • Final Draft Amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan • Final Draft Implementing Ordinance • Official Maps • • May 4, 2000 Page 4 of 4 The LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Matrix illustrates the organization of proposed LUP amendments and the direction of the proposed Implementing Ordinance. The matrix compares Coastal Act policies to the City's Certified LUP and relevant existing implementation measures. The right hand column of the matrix describes recommended changes to the Certified LUP, Zoning Ordinance and other City policies. The recommended changes to the Certified LUP proposed in the right hand column are also shown in the Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP. The proposed changes to the LUP are shown in strikeout and underlining. CONCUR: Sol BlumenfLild. ) irector Community Iii eve • sment P epartment .i iIv I �;� i�I► p Stephen R City Man er &Ken Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Coastal Zone Boundary Map 2. Resolution to amend L.U.P. 3. Ordinance to amend Municipal Code 4. Resolution to authorize transmittal of L.C.P. to Coastal Commission 5. Draft Amendments to the L.U.P. 6. Implementing Ordinance 7. L.U.P. and Implementation Measure Consistency Matrix 8. Map of L.C.P. amendment areas 9. Planning Commission Minutes Cc/coastalreport COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARIES o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, AMENDMING AND UPDATING THE CERTIFIED COASTAL LAND USE PLAN PORTION OF THE CITY'S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Portions of the City of Hermosa Beach are located within the Coastal Zone and subject to the requirements of the California Public Resources Code, Division 20, California Coastal Act of 1976, as amended: Section 2. The City of Hermosa Beach desires to certify their Local Coastal Program, including Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinance, and obtain the authority to issue Coastal Development Permits: Section 3. The City Council, pursuant to applicable law, held a duly noticed hearing on May 9, 2000, to consider the proposed Local Coastal Program, including proposed amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council: Section 4. The Planning Commission, pursuant to applicable law, held a duly noticed hearing on March 21, and April 5, 2000, to consider the proposed Local Coastal Program, including proposed amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council: Section 5. Based on the evidence considered at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following findings 1. The proposed Coastal Land Use Plan, as amended, has been prepared in accordance with the California Public Resources Code, Division 20, California Coastal Act of 1976, as amended, and is consistent with the provisions of said Act: 2. The City's Certified Coastal Land Use Plan, as amended, is consistent with the General Plan of the City and comprises the policy portion of the City's Local Coastal Program to be transmitted to the California Coastal Commission for certification; 1 1 • 3. The proposed Amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan are statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.9. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby amends the Certified Coastal Land Use Plan, to be submitted for consideration and certification by the California Coastal Commission as set forth in the following attachments, incorporated herein by reference: 1. Amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan Land Use Plan — dated May 9, 2000 2. Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment Areas'Map and index PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this of May, 2000 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • ORDINANCE 00 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE, ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ADOPT AN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE FOR THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, ESTABLISHING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE, AND OTHER TEXT AMENDMENTS TO IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES OF COASTAL LAND USE PLAN The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. Portions of the City of Hermosa Beach are located within the Coastal Zone and subject to the requirements of the California Public Resources Code, Division 20, California Coastal Act of 1976, as amended: Section 2. The City of Hermosa Beach desires to certify their Local Coastal Program, including Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinance, and obtain the authority to issue Coastal Development Permits. Section 3. The City Council, pursuant to applicable law, held a duly noticed hearing on May 9, 2000, to consider the proposed Local Coastal Program, including the proposed Implementation Ordinance and text amendments as recommended by the Planning Comission, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council. Section 4. The Planning Commission, pursuant to applicable law, held a duly noticed hearing on March 21, and April 5, 2000, to consider the proposed Local Coastal Program, including the proposed Implementation Ordinance and text amendments, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Commission. Section 5. Based on the evidence considered at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following findings 1. The proposed Implementation Ordinance of the Local Coastal Program and Zoning Amendment has been prepared in accordance with the California Public Resources Code, Division 20, California Coastal Act of 1976, as amended, and : 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 2. The proposed Implementation Ordinance and Zoning Code Amendment is consistent with the City's Certified Land Use Plan, as amended, General Plan and Municipal Code. 3. The proposed Amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan, Implementation Ordinance and Zoning Code Amendment are statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.9. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby ordains that the Municipal Code be amended as follows, to be submitted for consideration and certification by the California Coastal Commission as the Implementing Ordinance for the Local Coastal Program: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance, Title 17, by adding "Chapter 17.37, Coastal Development Overlay Zone," attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. Amend the City's Official Zoning Map as follows: 1. Designate the Beach and Strand as Open Space for consistency with the General Plan Open Space Designation. 2. Designate the Coastal Zone area on the Zoning Map with a Coastal Zone _ Overlay designation ("CZ"). 3. Amend Section 17.44.040, Parking Requirements for Downtown, as follows: "17.44.040_ Parking requirements for the downtown area. The following requirements apply within in the boundary of the downtown area, as defined by the map incorporated by this reference. A. For new retail and office developments of expansion of existing retail and offices the amount of parking shall be calculated at sixty-five (65) percent of the parking required for these uses each particular use as set forth in Section 17.44.030. B. Building sites equal to or le:c than ton thousand (10,000) squaro • floor area to lot area ratio exceeds 1:1 only the excess floor area over the 1:1 ratio shall be considered in determining the required parking pursuant to subsection A of this section. B.G. Bicycle racks/facilities shall be provided and/or maintained in conjunction with any intensification of use, or new construction, in an amount and location to the satisfaction of the planning Community Development Director." 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 4. Amend Section 17.44.140(E) pertaining to parking requirements for expansion of existing uses, as follows: "E. When the use of an existing building or structure is changed to a more intense use with a higher parking demand of floor area to lot area ratio in excess of 1:1. Otherwise, the requirement for additional parking, shall be calculated as the difference between the required parking as stated in this chapter for that particular use as compared to the requirement for the existing or previous use which shall be met prior to occupying the building unless otherwise specified in this chapter." 5. Amend Section 17.44.190 A, Off-street parking within vehicle parking districts, as follows "17.44.190 Off-street parking within vehicle parking districts. A. Parking requirements within parking districts shall be as provided in this chapter, except that when the city council provides for contributions to an improvement fund in lieu of parking spaces so required, said contributions shall be considered to satisfy the requirements of this chapter. If the downtown business area enhancement district commission City Council determines that the private party is responsible for the in -lieu fee, the private party shall pay _said fee as requested by the DBAEDC City Council- B. The building Community Development Director shall be responsible for the calculations required under this chapter and the building department shall calculate and collect the in -lieu contribution for, and as directed by, resolutions passed by the vehicle parking district commission, as approved by the City Council. C. The following allowances for parking The contribution of fees in - lieu of parking in the downtown area may be allowed permitted with a parking plan as approved by the planning commission and as prescribed in Section 17.44.210. 1. Building sites containing less than four thousand one ('1,001) . e. may pay an "in lieu" fee for all required spaces. 2. Building sites of less than four thousand one ('1,001) square feet required parking on site. 3. Building sites containing four thousand one (1,001) square feet or greater but less than twelve thousand one (12,001) -square feet shall be required to provide a minimum of fifty (50) percent of all required parking on site. 3 '1. Building sites with or greater than twelve thensand one (12,001) parking on site." Section 7. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from an after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 8. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the Cit Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper o general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manner provide by law. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shal enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of th passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which th same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cc/coastord City Clerk City Attorney 4 1 RESOLUTION 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF A COMPLETE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION FOR CERTIFICATION The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Portions of the City of Hermosa Beach are located within the Coastal Zone and subject to the requirements of the California Public Resources Code, Division 20, California Coastal Act of 1976, as amended: Section 2. The City of Hermosa Beach desires to certify their Local Coastal Program, including Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinance, and obtain the authority to issue Coastal Development Permits: Section 3. The Planning Commission and City Council gave full consideration to the proposed Local Coastal Program at properly noticed and advertised public hearings and the City Council approved the proposed Local Coastal Program, including amendments to the Certified Coastal Land Use Plan, and amendments to the Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance to adopt provisions to implement the Program. Section 4. Based on the foregoing the City Council does hereby resolve to submit a completed Local Coastal Program, and authorizes transmittal of all relevant documents and maps that make up the City's Local Coastal Program to the California Coastal Commission. • • Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714.966.9220 Fax: 714.966.9221 E-mail: costamesa(a planningcenter.com CITY COUNCIL DRAFT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Draft Amendments to the Certified Land Use Plan Submitted to: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council and Planning Commission Submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER MAY 9, 2000 INTRODUCTION The following document presents proposed amendments to the City of Hermosa Beach Certified Land Use Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. The amendments are necessary to update the L.U.P. and improve consistency with the California Coastal Act. The regulations to implement the policies of the LUP and the Coastal Act are contained under within the Draft Implementation Ordinance (separate cover).. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 i Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP • • TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Local Coastal Program Preparation 2 II. Parking and Access Summary 3 III. Coastal Recreation Resources 8 IV. Coastal Development and Design 9 City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 1 Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP Note: Proposed amended language is shown in bold as strike -through (text to be removed) and underlined (text to be added). I. Local Coastal Rias Program Preparation The Local Coastal Program incorporates the goals and policies of the Coastal Act into the City of Hermosa Beach's regulations. The Local Coastal Program identifies the location, type, densities and development standards for future development within the Coastal Zone. The Local Coastal Program is comprised of two documents: • Land Use Plan (LUP). A portion of the City's General Plan and General Plan Map addressing the California Coastal Act. • Implementing Ordinance. The portions of the City's development standards, operating procedures, Zoning Ordinance and maps that implement the requirements of the California Coastal Act. This document is the Land Use Plan portion of the City's Local Coastal Program. The Land Use Plan was originally certified by the Coastal Commission in 1982. The Land Use Plan was updated when the Local Coastal Program, including the Implementing Ordinance, was certified by the Coastal Commission on 2000. The Local Coastal Program was certified by the Coastal Commission following a Citywide informational mailer, two public hearings with the Planning Commission and public hearings with the City Council. The following are the Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs that will guide the implementation of the Coastal Act in the City of Hermosa Beach. The Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs are contained in three main categories: Parking and Access, Coastal Recreational Access, and Coastal Development and Design. Each category begins with a guiding Statement of Philosophy, City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 2 Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP followed by a set of broad Goals and Objectives, and finishes with a set of more detailed Policies and Programs. The Policies and Programs are divided into existing, measures that are currently employed by the City, and future policies and programs, measures that the City will employ when the ability and opportunity arise. II. Parking and Access Summary A. Statement of Philosophy To preserve and increase where feasible, residential, commercial, and general public parking within the Coastal Zone. B. Goals and objectives 1. To provide adequate residential pafking 2. To maintain adequate parking space for both visitors, and shoppers, and beach -goers. 3. To facilitate ocevide easy access to work-related parking for merchants. 4. To maximize the safety and accessibility of parking while minimizing noise, traffic congestion and negative visual impacts. 5. To provide an equitable distribution and allocation of parking resources. 6. To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian -oriented downtown business and visitor -serving area, which are Tess than a typical commercial area because of its proximity to a regional bike path and to high density residential areas, and to continue to explore and encourage new sources of parking, parking strategies, transit options, and alternative means of travel as alternatives to providing parking on-site for new development. in order C. Policies and Programs Hermosa's particular history of development is reflected in the following policies and programs. Policies have been divided into those policies that are now in force and currently supported by codes and ordinance and those policies that the City should consider for enactment. 1. Existing Policies and Programs Policy: That the City should not allow the elimination of existing on -street parking or off-street parking spaces within the coastal zone. Future residential and commercial construction should provide the actual parking necessary to meet the demand generated. In the pedestrian -oriented downtown commercial district alternatives to providing parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowed, to encourage alternatives to using motorized vehicles and to encourage improvement and enhancement of visitor -serving business activities. Program: Current City Building Codes and the Zoning Ordinance support the current policy. Two • The replacement of parking spaces, or other means deemed appropriate to reduce parking demand, is mandatory for all new developments in which on -street parking spaces are eliminated or the total number of off-street parking spaces are reduced. City of Hermosa Beach Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP 5/9/00 3 Policy: That the City should control congestion through the granting of parking permits through an allocation plan that reflects the actual need and supply. Policy: Balance beach access and residential parking by continuing the seasonal preferential parking and remote beach parking programs within impacted residential areas near the beach. Program: Continue to implement the preferential parking and remote beach parking program during the summer, pursuant to Coastal Development Permit 5-84-236, as amended, to provide beach access parking at parking meters and in "remote" but beach accessible parking lots, and to limit non-resident parking on designated residential streets. (As identified on the Preferential Parking District Boundary Map). Program: Provide and maintain signs to direct beach -goers to beach access remote parking lots, and other beach access parking lots within the City. Program: Public Free parking will continue to be provided to beach visitors en -the railroad right -of way at the following locations: • On the Greenbelt, between 8th and 11th Street, east side of Valley Drive Public lots near the Civic Center; West of Valley Drive adjacent to Valley Park Policy: Maintain a supply of parking that balances long-term (beach user) and short-term (shoppers) parking be -created in the downtown area to provide an adequate and flexible number of parking spaces to satisfy beach user and fer commercial demand. Program: Public parking is provided in the North Pier parking structure, public parking lots, and on the street. The rates for parking •• . • • - : at each of these downtown parking facilities = •• : will continue to be flexibly structured, recognizing seasonal and locational demands, to encourage an efficient balance between beach users, visitor -serving commercial uses, and other commercial demand. Program: The City has commissioned a study ' to develop a downtown parking plan. Program: The City Council, acting as members of theVehicle Parking District Commission, shall determine the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district • . . _ for the acquisition, construction of new parking facilities, and/or the maintenance and operation of existing parking facilities for the benefit of the area; for other improvements and enhancements including, but not limited to: street, landscaping, and pedestrian sidewalk improvements; public events; and the general promotion of business activities in the area. Policy: The City shall establish parking requirements in the Downtown Enhancement District (DED) identical to the requirements set forth in other areas of the City's coastal zone. However in recognition of the unique parking needs and constraints in the downtown district, the City may explore the creation of and grant exceptions to the parking requirements such as, but not limited to, in -lieu fee programs, parking plans, the creation of remote parking Tots with shuttle connections, reduced parking requirements, �r shared parking programs. for -new City of Hermosa Beach Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP 5/9/00 4 b c g rAc�ranted. s cu mmcr wnnkends 2. Exccptionc, Policy: Minimize parking impacts by encouraging a mix of visitor -serving and other commercial uses that balances peak and non -peak parking demand that occurs during the day and seasonally. Program: For new retail and office development or expansions of existing retail and office development within the DED, required parking in excess of that existing on the site at -the shall be provided at 65% of the current parking requirement. chaI a-requi-red Program: In order to mitigate the impacts of increased parking demand that is created by new; development, but is not compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces, the DEC, or its , City Council shall provide an in -lieu fund transfer 4r an in -lieu fee to an improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking, in an amount determined to be sufficient to off -set the increase in required parking spaces caused by the expansion, intensification, or new construction not provided on site. City of Hermosa Beach 4/5/00 Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP 5 • • If the DEC City Council determines that the private party is responsible for the in -lieu fee, the private party shall pay said fee as -requested -by -MC. Program: The City shall not accept a fee in lieu of providing on site parking unless the Community Development Director assures that sufficient parking exists to accommodate the parking demand of new development. The improvement fund to mitigate increased parking demand shall be geared to a threshold limit of increased parking demand. The threshold limit shall be established at 100 parking spaces and the City shall construct new parking upon reaching that threshold limit or the City shall not accept any fees in -lieu of parking beyond that threshold limit. its citizens and/or guests 2. Future Policies That the City should investigate and, where feasible, enact the following policies: site -far -curb -Guts Policy: That the City should maximize the efficiency of and consider investigate -the possibility of lease or purchase of parking Tots dispersed throughout the City and downtown enhancement district so as to minimize the impact on the parking demand to the City and its residents: r� received 'rcv. Policy: That the City should consider the reorientation of the City's current transportation service so as to provide transit service for visitors and residents according to their needs. City of Hermosa Beach Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP 4/5/00 6 • • evicting hour ctocL each „f the r cidcntiai es general-plan-stan dards: nnner• petentia k City of Hermosa Beach Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP 4/5/00 7 III. Coastal Recreational Access A. Statement of Philosophy Hermosa Beach shall maintain its current high level of recreational access to the coast and its recreational facilities and be consistent with maintaining the beach in its most natural state. B. Goals and Objectives 1. Maximum access and recreational opportunities shall be provided for all the people consistent with public safety needs and the need to protect public rights, rights of private property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse. 2. Low cost visitor recreational facilities will be maintained and encouraged where feasible. 3. The City shall protect its coastal resources for recreational activities. C. Policies and Programs Hermosa's particular history of development is reflected in the following policies and programs. Policies have been divided into those policies that are now in force and currently supported by codes and ordinance and those policies that the City should consider for enactment. 1. Existing Policies and Programs Policy: That the City should restrict buildings and structures on the beach with regards to size and number consistent with current access, safety, and beach usage. Police/Lifeguard structures should be held to a minimum both in size and number consistent with good safety practices. Program: The City presently has within its Beach Development Plan (adopted Jan. 4, 1972 and included as Appendix F) a restriction on the type and number of facilities that can be placed on the beach west of the Strand. Policy: Recreational activities on the beach should be maintained both during the daylight hours and night hours. Program: Improved and more functional lighting on the Strand has been provided. Policy: Vehicular traffic, including lifeguard trucks and police cars should be barred from the beach and the Strand except for emergencies and necessary cleaning and patrolling functions. Policy: That existing access through regular streets and walk -streets that now give everyone excellent access to and from the beach shall continue. (See Appendix C, Page C-2, Figure 8). 2. Future Policies and Programs City of Hermosa Beach Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP 4/5/00 8 • Policy: That the City should, in conjunction with the City of Manhattan Beach, create a continuous and seamless beachfront bicycle and pedestrian path between the two cities. Policy: That the City should promote beach and recreational facilities related to commercial development by refining the commercial (C-2) zone to encourage commercial -recreational uses. Policy: The City, where feasible, should construct parkettes and pedestrian spaces similar to the ones constructed at 13th, 14th and 15th Streets and Beach Drive. Policy: That the parkettes and pedestrian spaces should be integrated with the east side of the Strand to provide rest areas with benches and that the placement of benches and other pedestrian amenities be distributed evenly along the Strand to avoid congestion points. IV. Coastal Development and Design A. Statement of Philosophy Hermosa Beach is a densely developed, older community which is in transition and which is a coastal resource for the people of California. B. Goals and Objectives 1. To develop a stable population which is suited to available land area and community resources. 2. To preserve and enhance coastal overview and key view point areas. 3. To encourage historic preservation to maintain the eclectic character of Hermosa Beach's mixed architectural styles. 4. To continue to develop facilities that serve the needs of both coastal visitors and the City's residents. 5. To preserve and, where feasible, enhance the City's remaining open space. C. Policies and Programs Hermosa's particular history of development is reflected in the following policies and programs. Policies have been divided into those policies that are now in force and currently supported by codes and ordinance and those policies that the City should consider for enactment. 1. Existing Policies and Programs Policy: Development in the Coastal Zone will be reviewed and permitted pursuant to the provisions of the Coastal Act and the policies and implementation programs of the City's Local Coastal Program. Policy: That the City should restrict building height to protect overview and view shed qualities and preserve the City's existing low-rise profile. Program: Zoning and building codes limit the height of all structures depending on zone. The City of Hermosa Beach Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP 4/5/00 9 Policy: Establish residential condominium approval procedure that will encourage the development of units that will contribute to and are consistent with the evolving character of the City. Program: The current condominium ordinance, which includes design and building permit review, are programs that support this policy. Policy: That the zoning and general plan will be made consistent. Program: The City began the process to resolve inconsistencies between the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map in 1981, and resolved the inconsistencies within the Coastal Zone by 1990. Policy: The City should always encourage creativity in commercial, and residential development, allowing variety and flexibility, while maintaining high standards of design. enacted. Program: The City will continue its current Precise Development Plan process to ensure flexibility and quality in all residential and commercial development. Policy: The City should continue to maintain high standards of design for public works projects and public improvement programs, including the redevelopment of the streetscape at upper and lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue in the downtown area. Program: The City will continue to utilize the City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan, dated October 1994, as a guideline for the design and development of the streetscape at upper and lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. Policy: Although the LUP proposed no additional construction of structures seaward of the mean high tide line, the City recognizes the need to maintain consistency with provisions required for shoreline structures in other jurisdictions. Program: "Revetments, breakwaters, groins, harbor channels, seawalls, cliff retaining walls, and other such construction that alters natural shoreline processes shall be permitted when required to serve coastal -dependent uses or to protect existing structures or public beaches in danger from erosion and when designed and constructed to minimize erosive impact on adjacent unprotected property and minimize encroachment on to the beach and shall indicate all area seaward of the seawall for lateral access for the public. City of Hermosa Beach 4/5/00 10 Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP Policy: Encourage the preservation of the City's historical buildings and cultural heritage. (Existing policy reworded and relocated from below) Program: In November 1998 the City conducted a survey of historic resources, adopted a historic preservation ordinance, and designated a historic landmark. 2. Future Policies and Programs (Existing policy relocated above). Policy: The Zoning Code will be examined to remove unnecessary impediments to the recycling rehabilitation of existing commercial and residential structures. Policy: That the City Encourage coastal -related visitor -serving commercial land uses within the downtown area. Policy: That the City construct, where appropriate, landscaping along the east side of the Strand in order to improve the aesthetic appearance of the Strand. Policy: The former Biltmore Site, known as Noble Park and North Pier Parking Structure, is a vital asset of the people of Hermosa Beach. beach public parking. This coastal site is public open space and Program: The certified land use designations for the publicly owned property known as the Biltmore Site are as follows (Amended by vote of the people November 5, 1992). 1. The designation for the property specifically known as the Biltmore Site, known as Noble Park, is Restricted Open Space (O -S-2), to ensure its preservation and use as a public park. - 2. The designation for that part of the Biltmore Site known as laking -Lot C known as the North Pier Parking Structure is commercial/Public Beach Parking. City of Hermosa Beach 4/5/00 11 Draft Amendments to the Certified LUP • • Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 CITY COUNCIL DRAFT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Implementing Ordinance Submitted to: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council and Planning Commission Submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER MAY 9, 2000 • • Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714.966.9220 Fax: 714.966.9221 E-mail: costamesac planningcenter.com CITY COUNCIL DRAFT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Implementing Ordinance Submitted to: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council and Planning Commission Submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER MAY 9, 2000 • • INTRODUCTION The following document presents the proposed implementing ordinance portion of the City of Hermosa Beach Local Coastal Program as recommended by the Planning Commission. The proposed ordinance would apply to the portion of the City that is located within the Coastal Zone. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 1 Draft Implementing Ordinance CHAPTER 17.37 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE 17.37.010 Purpose 17.37.020 Definitions 17.37.030 Permit Required 17.37.040 Exemptions and Categorical Exclusions 17.37.050 Coastal Development Permit Applications 17.37.060 Determination of Jurisdiction 17.37.070 Resolving Jurisdictional Determination Disputes 17.37.080 Coastal Development Permit Notice Requirements 17.37.090 Coastal Development Permit Public Hearings 17.37.100 Coastal Development Permit Approval or Denial Findings 17.37.110 Conditions of Approval 17.37.120 Notice of Action and Appeal Rights 17.37.130 Appeals 17.37.140 Expiration of Unused Permits 17.37.150 Amendments to Coastal Development Permit Permits 17.37.160 Reapplication 17.37.170 Revocation of Coastal Development Permits 17.37.190 Enforcement 17.37.190 Emergency Coastal Development Permits 17.37.200 Continuing Validity of Permit 17.37.210 Local Coastal Program Amendments 17.37.220 Encroachments 17.37.230 Downtown Implementation Plan 17.37.240 Water Quality 17.37.250 Temporary/Special Event Calendar 17.37.010 Purpose. The regulations of this Chapter shall apply in the Coastal Zone, as defined by the California Coastal Act and map prepared by the California Coastal Commission and zoned as Coastal Zone Overlay (-CZ) on the City's Zoning Map. The Coastal Development Permit is established to ensure that public or private development within the Coastal Zone conforms to the policies and programs of the California Coastal Act (Division 20 of the Public Resources Code) as amended, the City of Hermosa Beach Certified Local Coastal Program, the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and any_implementation programs. 17.37.020 Definitions Definitions of terms not contained herein, shall be the same those terms are defined in Coastal Act. "Appealable Development" means any development project that may be appealed to the Commission and is located within or constitutes any of the following:_ I. Approval of a development project located within any appealable area, as follows: a. All areas between the sea and first public road paralleling the sea or within three hundred (300) feet of the inland extent of any beach or the mean high tide line of the sea where there is no beach, whichever is the greater distance. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 2 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • b. All areas within one hundred (100) feet of any wetland, estuary, or stream and all areas within three hundred (300) feet of the top of the seaward face of any coastal bluff. 2. Approval or denial of a development project that constitutes a major public works project or a major energy facility. 3. Approvals of developments that require an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. "Applicant' means the person, partnership, corporation, or state or local government agency applying for a Coastal Development Permit. "Approving Authority" means a City officer, City Council, or commission approving a Coastal Development Permit. "Coastal Commission" means the California Coastal Commission. "Coastal Development Permit" means a permit issued by the City of Hermosa Beach, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, approving development in the CZ Overlay District as being in conformance with the Local Coastal Program. A Coastal Development Permit includes all application materials, plans and conditions on which the approval is based. "Coastal Policy Checklist" means a form prepared and completed by the Director as a guide for reviewing a Coastal Development Permit application for conformance with the Local Coastal Program. It shall list appropriate application information, all relevant Local Coastal Program policies, those policies with which the application does not comply, and recommended conditions, if any, which could be imposed to bring the application into compliance. "Coastal Zone" means that portion of the Coastal Zone, as established by the Coastal Act of 1976 and as it may subsequently be amended, that lies within the City of Hermosa Beach, as indicated on a map on record with the Department of Community Development. "Development" means on land, in or under water, the placement or erection of any solid material or structure; discharge or disposal of any materials; grading, removing, dredging, mining, or extraction of any materials; change in the density or intensity of use of land, including, but not limited to, subdivision pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with Section 66410 of the Government Code), and any other division of land, including lot splits, except where the land division is brought about in connection with the purchase of such land by a public agency for public recreational use; change in the intensity of use of water, or of access thereto; construction, reconstruction, demolition. or alteration of the size of any structure, including any facility of any private, public, or municipal utility; and the removal or harvesting of major vegetation other than for agricultural purposes, kelp harvesting and timber operations. "Director" means the City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Director. "Emergency" means a sudden unexpected occurrence demanding immediate action to prevent or mitigate Toss or damage to life, health, property or essential public services City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 3 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • "Local Coastal Program" means the City's land -use plans, Planning and Zoning Ordinances, zoning maps, and implementation actions certified by the Coastal Commission as meeting the requirements of the California Coastal Act of 1976. "Major Public Works Project" means: 1. A public works project that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) in its estimated cost of construction with an automatic increase in accordance with the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index, except for those governed by the provisions of Public Resources Code Sections 30610, 30610.5, 301611 or 30624. 2. Not withstanding the criteria in (1), "major public works" also means publicly financed recreational facilities that serve, affect, or otherwise impact regional or statewide use of the facilities. "Other Permits and Approvals" means permits and approvals, other than a Coastal Development Permit, required by the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning or Municipal Code before a development may proceed. "Overlay District" means a set of zoning requirements, described in the ordinance text and mapped, which is imposed in addition to the requirements of one or more underlying districts. Development in such districts must comply with the requirements of both the Overlay District and the underlying base zoning district and Area District. "Pemittee" means the person, partnership, corporation or agency issued a Coastal Development Permit. "Project" means any development as defined in this section. "Sea" means the Pacific Ocean and all harbors, bays, channels, estuaries, salt marshes, sloughs, and other areas subject to tidal action through -any connection with the Pacific Ocean excluding non -estuarine rivers, streams, tributaries, creeks, and flood control and drainage channels. "Sensitive coastal resource areas" means those identifiable and geographically bounded land and water areas within the Coastal Zone of vital interest and sensitivity. "Sensitive coastal resources areas" include the following: 1. Special marine and land habitat areas, wetlands, lagoons, and estuaries as mapped and designated in the coastal plan. 2. Areas possessing significant recreational value. 3. Highly scenic areas. 4. Archaeological sites referenced in the California Coastline and Recreation Plan or as designated by the State Historic Preservation Officer. 5. Special communities or neighborhoods which are significant visitor destination areas. 6. Areas that provide existing coastal housing or recreational opportunities for low- and moderate - income persons. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 4 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • 7. Areas where divisions of land could substantially impair or restrict coastal access. "Temporary/Special Event" is an activity or use that does not exceed a two week period on a continual basis, or does not exceed a consecutive four month period on an intermittent basis. A Temporary/Special Event involves the placement of non -permanent structures, such as film sets and equipment, bleachers, perimeter fencing, vendor tents/canopies, judging stands, trailers, portable toilets, sound/video equipment, stages, platforms, which do not involve grading or landform alteration for installation, and/or exclusive use of a sandy beach, parkland, water, streets or parking area which is otherwise open and available for general public use. "Exclusive use" means a use that precludes use in the area of the event for public recreation, beach access or access to coastal waters other than for or through the event itself. 17.37.030 Permit Required A. Coastal Development Permit Required. Any development in the Coastal Zone shall obtain a Coastal Development Permit, with the exception of projects identified in Section 30519 (b) of the Public Resources Code or a development specifically exempted by Section 17.37.040 this Division. B. Determination of Exemption or Categorical Exclusion. A determination of whether a development is exempt or categorically excluded from the Coastal Development Permit requirements shall be made by the Director at the time an application is submitted for development within the Coastal Zone pursuant to Section 17.37.040. Any dispute arising from the Director's determination shall be resolved pursuant to the procedure described in Section 17.37.070. C. Existing Coastal Development Permits or Applications in Process. The following shall apply to existing applications for Coastal Development Permits or existing Coastal Development Permits: 1. Development authorized by a permit issued by the California Coastal Commission shall remain under the jurisdiction of the Commission for the purposes of compliance, amendment, extension, reconsideration and revocation. 2. Any proposed development that the City preliminarily approved before effective certification of the Local Coastal Program and which has not been filed complete with the Commission, shall be re- submitted to the City through an application for a permit pursuant to the Local Coastal Program. 3. Any proposed development that the City preliminarily approved before effective certification of the Local Coastal Program and which has been filed complete with the Commission may, at the option of the applicant, remain with the Commission for review. Projects that elect to obtain a coastal permit from the Coastal Commission shall remain under the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in (1) above. 4. Upon effective certification of the Local Coastal Program, no applications for development within the certified area shall be accepted by the California Coastal Commission. 17.37.040 Exemptions and Categorical Exclusions A. Exemptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the following projects that comply with all applicable zoning standards and where no discretionary zoning approvals are necessary: 1. Additions to existing single-family residences and ancillary structures such as garages, swimming pools, fences, storage sheds and landscaping with the exception of the following: City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 5 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • a. Development that involves a risk of adverse environmental effect pursuant to Section 13250, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. b. Improvements to any structure in the appealable area when such improvements could result in any of the following: (1) An increase of 10 percent or more of the internal floor area of existing structure(s) on the building site or an additional increase in floor area bringing the aggregate increase to 10 percent or more. (2) The construction of an additional story or loft or increase in building height of more than 10 percent. (3) The construction, placement or establishment of any significant detached structure such as a garage. c. Any significant alteration of land forms including removal or placement of vegetation on a beach, wetland, or sand dune, or within 50 feet of the edge of a coastal bluff or stream, or in areas of natural vegetation designated by resolution of the Coastal Commission as a significant natural habitat. 2. The maintenance, alteration or addition to existing structures, other than a single-family residence or public works facilities, provided the project does not involve: a. An adverse effects as specified in Section 13253, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. b. Any improvement to a structure that changes the intensity of use or use of the structure. c. Any significant alteration of land forms including removal or placement of vegetation on a beach, wetland or sand dune, or within 100 feet of the edge of a coastal bluff or stream or in areas of natural vegetation designated by resolution of the Coastal Commission as a significant natural habitat. 3. Repair or maintenance activities that do not result in an addition, enlargement or expansion unless classified as: a. Repair or maintenance of a seawall revetment, breakwater, groin, culvert, outfall or similar shoreline work that involves: (1) Substantial alteration of the foundation, including pilings and other surface and subsurface structures. (2) The placement, whether temporary or permanent, of rip -rap, or artificial berms of sand, or any other form of solid material on a beach, or in coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, or on shoreline protective works. (3) The replacement of twenty (20) percent or more of the materials of an existing structure with materials of a different kind. (4) The presence, whether temporary or permanent, of mechanized construction equipment or materials on any sand area or bluff or within twenty (20) feet of coastal waters or streams. b. The replacement of twenty (20) percent or more of a sea wall revetment, bluff retaining wall, breakwater, groin, or similar protective work under one ownership, unless destroyed by natural disaster. 4. The installation, testing, placement in service or the replacement of any necessary utility connection between an existing service facility and any development approved pursuant to the California Coastal Act; provided that the Director may require reasonable conditions to mitigate any adverse impacts on City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 6 Draft Implementing Ordinance coastal resources, including scenic resources. All repair, maintenance and utility hook-ups shall be consistent with the provisions adopted by the California Coastal Commission. 5. The replacement of any structure, other than a public works facility, destroyed by a disaster. The replacement structure shall conform to applicable existing zoning requirements; shall be'for the same use as the destroyed structure, shall not exceed either the floor area, height or bulk of the destroyed structure by more than 10 percent; and, shall be sited in the same location on the affected property as the destroyed structure. 6. Maintenance dredging of existing navigation channels or moving dredged material from those channels to a disposal area outside the Coastal Zone, pursuant to a permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers. 7. Any category of development determined by the Coastal Commission to have no potential for any significant impact on the environment, coastal resources or public access to the coast. 8. Temporary/Special Event. a. Temporary/Special events shall be exempt from Coastal Development Permit requirements except those meeting any of the following criteria: 1. It is held between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day; and, 2. It occupies all or a portion of a sandy beach area; and, 3. In the opinion of the Community Development Director, the location, nature, configuration or length of the event, may result in impacts to coastal recreational opportunities and resources, access and impacts to the environment. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following are exempt: (1) If an admission fee is charged for entry to the event, the fee is for preferred seating only and more than 75% of the provided seating capacity is available free of charge for general public use; or, (2) The event is Tess than 24 hours in duration; or, (3) The event has previously received a Coastal Development Permit and will be held in the same location, at a similar season, and for the same duration, with operating and environmental conditions substantially the same as those associated with the previously approved event. c. The Director or the City Council may determine that a Temporary/Special event shall be subject to Coastal Development Permit review if unique or changing circumstances exist relative to a particular Temporary/Special event that have the potential for significant adverse impacts on coastal resources. Such circumstances may include the following: (1) The event, either individually or together with other temporary events scheduled before or after the particular event, precludes the general public from use of a public recreational area for a significant period of time; City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 7 Draft Implementing Ordinance S (2) The event and its associated activities or access requirements will either directly or indirectly impact environmentally sensitive habitat areas, rare or endangered species, significant scenic resources, or other coastal resources; (3) The event is scheduled between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day and would restrict public use of roadways or parking areas or otherwise significantly impact public use or access to coastal waters; (4) The event has historically required a Coastal Development Permit to address and monitor associated impacts to coastal resources. d. In addition to any necessary Coastal Development Permits, Temporary/Special Events must obtain a Special Event Permit from the Department of Community Resources. B. Categorical Exclusions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the following projects: 1. All projects consistent with the zoning ordinance that do not require discretionary review and are not located in the appealable area or are subject to appeal as stated in Section 17.37.130. 2. Municipal improvement projects of less than $50,000 in cost and only where such projects would not alter vehicular capacity of public streets or intersections by more than 10 percent (except traffic control devices such as stop signs or lights), would not alter on or off-street parking that would decrease the number of spaces, and would not alter circulation patterns that would impair beach access. 3: Traffic control signing and minor roadway improvements including: a. Culvert replacement; b. Guardrails, retaining walls; c. Signs for traffic control and guidance, including roadway markings and pavement delineation; d. Drainage course maintenance and cleaning involving less than 50 cubic yards of excavations; and e. Parking meter installation and repair. 4. Minor accessory structures in conformance with applicable provisions of this code. 5. Minor Development including: a. Sign permits in conformance with applicable provisions of this code. b. Temporary use permits in conformance with applicable provisions of this code. c. Variances that do not pertain to building heights and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors. d. Grading which does not involve one hundred (100) cubic yards or more of material and brush or vegetation removal other than major vegetation. • City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 8 Draft Implementing Ordinance e. Fences and walls six (6) feet or less in height except when such walls or fences will obstruct or otherwise limit public access to the beach or other facilities to which access is protected under the Coastal Act. f. Installation of irrigation lines. g. Buildings or structures, or additions, having an aggregate value of $1,000 or less. 6. Miscellaneous Activities including: a. Installation testing, placement in service or the replacement of any necessary utility connection between an existing service facility and any development that has previously been granted a Coastal Development Permit. b. Actions listed as ministerial in the California Environmental Quality Act, including: (1) Issuance of building permits, (2) Issuance of business licenses, (3) Approval of final subdivision maps; and (4) Approval of individual utility service connections and disconnections. 7. The City shall maintain a record of all permits issued for categorically excluded developments for public review. Each permit shall contain the name of applicant, location of project and a brief description of the project. 8. Notice for projects that are categorically excluded shall be provided to the Coastal Commission within five (5) working days. 17.37.050 Coastal Development Permit Applications A. Application. Applications for a Coastal Development Permit shall be approved prior to issuance of building permits.- A Coastal Development Permit application shall be made to the Community Development Department on forms provided by the same Department. The required contents of the Coastal Development Permit shall be as set forth by the Community Development Department and shall be accompanied by the filing fee as established by resolution of the City Council. The applicant shall state in the application how: 1. The proposed development conforms to the certified Local Coastal Program. 2. The proposed development, located between the nearest public road and the sea, is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3, Division 20 of the Public Resources Code. B. Refusal of Acceptance of Application for Lack of information. The Director may reject, without a public hearing, an application for a Coastal Development Permit if such application does not contain the required information. C. Concurrent Filing. A Coastal Development Permit shall be considered concurrently with any other discretionary permits or approvals required for the project by the City. 17.37.060 Determination of Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 9 Draft Implementing Ordinance A. Determination. Prior to or at the time of an application for a Coastal Development Permit, the Director shall determine if the proposed project is located within an area that is: 1. An area where the California Coastal Commission continues to exercise Original Permit Jurisdiction, as defined in Section 30519 of the California Coastal Act, and the applicant must obtain a Coastal Development Permit directly from the Coastal Commission. 2. Appealable to the Coastal Commission and requires a Coastal Development Permit. 3. Non -appealable to the Coastal Commission and requires a Coastal Development Permit. 4. Categorically excluded or exempt and does not require a Coastal Development Permit. 17.37.070 Resolving Jurisdictional Determination Disputes A. Dispute Procedure. Where a question as to the appropriate jurisdiction has arisen, the following procedures shall establish whether a development is exempt, categorically excluded, non -appealable or appealable: 1. The local government shall make its determination as to what type of development is being proposed (i.e. exempt, categorically excluded, appealable, non -appealable) and shall inform the applicant of the notice and hearing requirements for that particular development. 2. If the determination of the local government is challenged, or if the local government wishes to have the Commission determine the appropriate designation, the local government shall notify the Commission by telephone of the dispute/question and shall request an Executive Director's opinion. 3. The Executive Direcfor shall, within two (2) working days of the local government request (or upon completion of a site inspection where such inspection is warranted), transmit his or her determination as to whether the development is exempt, categorically excluded, non -appealable or appealable. 4. Where, after the Executive Director's investigation, the Executive Director's determination is not in accordance with the local government's determination, the Coastal Commission shall hold a hearing for purposes of determining the appropriate designation for the area. The Coastal Commission shall schedule the hearing on the determination for the next Commission meeting (in the appropriate geographic region of the State) following the local government request. 17.37.080 Coastal Development Permit Notice Requirements A. Notice of Hearing. The Director shall provide notice of a hearing for a Coastal Development Permit by first class mail at least 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing to the following: 1. The applicant. 2. In Appealable Areas: Property owners and occupants of commercial and residential property located within a 300 -foot radius. 3. In Non -Appealable Areas: Property owners within a 300 -foot radius and occupants of commercial and residential property within a 100 -foot radius. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 10 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • 4. The California Coastal Commission, public agencies that have an interest in the project, newspaper of general circulation. 5. Any person who has requested to be noticed of such permit. B. Contents of Coastal Development Permit Hearing Notice. In addition to the noticing required for public hearings in accordance with City Council policy, the notice for a Coastal Development Permit shall contain the following information: 1. A statement that the development is located within the Coastal Zone and is either Appealable or Non - Appealable to the Coastal Commission. 2. A statement of the public comment period. 3. The date of the filing of the application and the name of the applicant. 4. The file number assigned to the application. 5. A description of the development at its proposed location. 6. The date, time, and place at which the application will be heard. 7. A brief description of the general procedure concerning the conduct of hearing and local actions. 8. The procedure for local and Coastal Commission appeals, including any local fees required. 17.37.090 Coastal Development Permit Public Hearings A. Hearing. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review and consider an application for a Coastal Development Permit. B. Findings. All decisions on the Coastal Development Permit shall be accompanied by separate written findings, as specified in Section 17.37.100. C. Continuation of Action. A public hearing for a Coastal Development Permit may be continued without new public notice to another day if continued to a date certain. If the public hearing is continued to a date uncertain, notice of the continued public hearing shall be provided in accordance with Section, 17.37.080. 17.37.100 Coastal Development Permit Approval or Denial Findings A. Findings for Approval. An application for a Coastal Development Permit shall be approved when the evidence substantiates to the satisfaction of the approving authority the following findings: 1. The proposed development is in conformity with the Certified Local Coastal Program. 2. Any development, located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the Coastal Zone, is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of Division 20 of the Public Resources Code. 3. The proposed development conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 11 Draft Implementing Ordinance B. Findings for Denial. An application for a Coastal Development Permit shall be denied where the evidence fails to substantiate the basis for approval contained in Section 17.37.100 A. 17.37.110 Conditions of Approval The City may impose conditions as necessary to ensure that the Coastal Development Permit conforms to the requirements of the Local Coastal Program. The landowner and applicant shall record with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder an affidavit accepting and agreeing to implement all conditions of permit approval, and binding all successors to said conditions of approval, which run with the land. 17.37.120 Notice of Action and Appeal Rights A. Notice of Action. Within seven (7) calendar days of an action on a Coastal Development Permit, the Director shall provide notice of such action by first class mail to the applicant, property owner, the Coastal Commission and to any person or agency who specifically requested notice of such decision by submitting a self-addressed stamped envelope to the Community Development Department. B. Contents of Notice of Action. The notice of action shall contain the following information: 1. Project description. 2. Written findings for approval and conditions of approval (if any). 3. Appeal procedure and appeal period as specified in Section 17.37.130. 17.37.130 Appeals A. Final Decision. A decision shall be considered final when all local appeal periods, specified below, have been exhausted and the effective dates of appeal periods have been reached. B. Local Appeals 1. The City Council may initiate a review of the decision of the Planning Commission by any two votes of the City Council at their meeting succeeding the Planning Commission action pursuant to Section 2.52.040. In the event the Council initiates such a review the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its review hearing and takes final action on the Coastal Development Permit. 2. Within ten (10) days following the Council meeting that succeeds the Planning Commission action, an appeal in writing may be filed with the City Council by any person dissatisfied with the decision of the Planning Commission. The filing of such appeal within such time shall stay the effective date of the order of the Planning Commission until such time as the City Council has acted on the appeal. 3 Within forty (40) days of a review initiated by Council, or an appeal filed by a dissatisfied person, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing, which shall be noticed as required by Section 17.68.050. 4. The decision of the City Council, supported by findings as set forth in Section 17.37.100, shall be set forth in full in a resolution. 5. Within seven (7) calendar days of an action on an appeal of a Coastal Development Permit, the Director shall provide notice of the final local action as required by Section 17.37.120 C. Appeals to the Coastal Commission City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 12 Draft Implementing Ordinance • 1. Exhaustion of Local Appeals. An appellant must exhaust all local appeals under the City's appeal procedure prior to filing an appeal to the Coastal Commission. 2. Non Appealable Jurisdiction: A decision for a development located in the non -appealable jurisdiction is not appealable unless the development: a. Requires amendment to the Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. b. Constitutes a major public works project or a major energy facility. 3. Appellants: A decision for a development located in the appealable jurisdiction or as described in 17.30.130 C2 above may be appealed by: a. The applicant or aggrieved person who exhausted local appeals. b. Any two members of the Coastal Commission. 4. Appeal Time Limit: All appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days of the date of final local action on the Coastal Development Permit. 5. Grounds for Appeal. The grounds for an appeal of a local decision on a development shall be limited to an allegation that the decision did not conform to the Certified Local Coastal Program. 6. Effect of Appeal to the Coastal Commission. Upon receipt of a notice from the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission that an appeal has been filed the City shall refrain from issuing a building permit on the development pending Coastal Commission Action on the appeal. 17.37.140 Expiration of Unused Permits A. Permit Expiration. If development authorized by permit has not commenced within the specified time, or if no time is specified, within two years of the granting of the permit, the permit becomes null and void with the exception of the following: 1. In the case of a permit for a publicly owned use, no time limit shall apply to utilization of such permit provided that the public agency accomplished the following: a. Within one year of the approval date, the City either acquires the property involved or commences legal proceedings for its acquisition. b. Immediately after the acquisition of, or the commencement of legal proceedings for the acquisition of the property, posts such property with signs, having an area of not less than 20 square feet nor more than 40 square feet in area indicating the agency and the purpose of which it is to be developed. One such sign shall be placed facing and located within 5 feet of each street, highway or parkway bordering the property. Where the property in question is not bounded by a street, highway or parkway, the agency shall erect one sign facing the street, highway or parkway nearest the property. 2. In the case of a Coastal Development Permit heard concurrently with any other discretionary permit, the Planning Commission and/or City Council shall specify time limits and extensions to be concurrent and consistent with those of the land division, variance or other permit. 3. Extension of Permit. The Planning Commission may extend a permit for a period of not to exceed one year, provided an application requesting such extension is filed prior to such expiration date. In City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 13 Draft Implementing Ordinance the case of a non-profit corporation organized to provide low-income housing, the Planning Commission may grant an additional one-year extension, provided that an application requesting such extension is filed prior to the expiration of the first such extension. B. Expiration Following Cessation of Use. A Coastal Development Permit granted by action of the Planning Commission or City Council shall automatically cease to be of any force and effect if the use for which such Coastal Development Permit was granted has ceased or has been suspended for a consecutive period of two or more years. 17.37.150 Amendments to Coastal Development Permits A. Amendment Procedure. An amendment shall be accomplished in the same manner specified for initial approval of the Coastal Development Permit. All sections of this Chapter shall apply to permit amendments. B. Application for Amendments. An amendment may be made to a Coastal Development Permit previously approved by the City by filing a written application with the Director. Such application shall contain a description of the proposed amendment, the reason for the amendment, together with maps, drawings or other material appropriate to the request. A filing fee, as required by Resolution of City Council, shall accompany a request for an amendment. C. Rejection of Application for Amendment. An application for an amendment shall be rejected if it would compromise the original permit unless the applicant presents newly discovered material information which could not, with reasonable diligence, have been discovered and produced before the permit was granted. D. Action on Amendments. For those Coastal Development Permit Amendment applications accepted, the Director shall determine whether the proposed amendment represents an immaterial or material change to the permit. 1. For amendment applications representing immaterial changes, the Director shall prepare and send a written notice as required by Section 17.37.120, including a statement informing persons of the opportunity to submit written objections to the Director within 10 days of the date the notices were mailed to persons within a 300 foot radius. The Director shall also mail notices to all persons who testified at a public hearing on the permit and who submitted written testimony on the permit and such other persons as the Director has reason to know may be interested in the application. If the Director receives no written objections within 10 days of mailing, the Director's determination shall be conclusive and the proposed amendment approved. 2. For amendment applications representing material changes, objections to determinations of immateriality, or amendments to conditions affecting coastal resource protection or coastal access, a Coastal Development Permit Amendment is required per 17.37.150. A. The Director shall mail notices in accordance with Section 17.37.080, and to all persons who testified at the public hearing on the permit, submitted written testimony on the permit, objected to the Director's determination of immateriality, or such persons as the Director has reason to know may be interested in the application. 3. The appropriate reviewing body shall review material changes and determine whether the proposed development and amendment are consistent with the California Coastal Act and the Certified Local Coastal Program. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 14 Draft Implementing Ordinance 17.37.160 Reapplication A. Reapplication Limit. No application for a Coastal Development Permit that has been previously denied shall be filed earlier than one (1) year after the date such denial becomes effective, unless the request for reapplication reflects a major change in circumstances and specific permission has been granted by the Approving Authority. 17.37.170 Revocation of Coastal Development Permits A. Grounds for Revocation. The City may initiate proceedings to revoke a Coastal Development Permit upon the receipt of evidence indicating that: 1. The applicant included inaccurate, erroneous and/or incomplete information, and if accurate and complete information had been provided, the Coastal Development Permit would not have been approved or different conditions of approval would have been imposed; or, 2. The applicant is violating the conditions of approval, has been requested by the City to correct said violation, and has failed to correct a violation despite this request by the City. 3. The development is being operated in such a manner as to be a threat to public health and safety or is creating a nuisance. B. Initiation of Revocation. The City may initiate proceedings to revoke a permit based on evidence submitted by any person because of the reasons stated in Subsection A. The Director shall review the stated grounds for revocation and, unless the request is patently frivolous and without merit, shall initiate revocation proceedings. C. Temporary Suspension. Where the Director determines that grounds exist for revocation of a Coastal Development Permit, the operation of the permit shall be reviewed and be automatically suspended if it is a threat to public health and safety. The Director shall advise the applicant in writing that any development undertaken during suspension of the permit may be in violation of the California Coastal Act. D. Procedure for Revocation. The Director shall notify the permittee by mailing a copy of the request for revocation and a summary of the procedures contained in this section to the address shown in the permit application. The Planning Commission may, after a public hearing noticed and held in the manner prescribed in Sections 17.37.080 and 17.37.090, revoke or modify the permit. 17.37.180 Enforcement In addition to the enforcement provisions contained in this ordinance, the provisions of the California Coastal Act contained in Chapter 9 of Division 20 of the Public Resources Code shall also apply with respect to violations and enforcement. 17.37.190 Emergency Coastal Development Permits A. Emergency Permits. In the event of a verified emergency, a temporary emergency authorization to proceed with remedial measures may be given by the Director until such time as a full Coastal Development Permit application has been be filed, as set forth in Sections 13136 through 13143, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. The application to be reported at the time of emergency or within three (3) working days after the emergency shall include the following: 1. Nature of the emergency. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 15 Draft Implementing Ordinance 2. Cause of the emergency, insofar as this can be established. 3. Location of the emergency. 4. The remedial, protective, or preventive work required to deal with the emergency. 5. The circumstances during the emergency that appeared to justify the cause(s) of action taken, including the probable consequences of filing to take action. B. Immediate Emergency Action. In some instances it may be necessary to take immediate action to protect life and public property from imminent danger, or to restore, repair, or maintain public works, utilities, or services destroyed, damaged, or interrupted by natural disaster, serious accident, or other emergency, before applications and procedures for obtaining a permit can be complied with in a timely manner. In such cases the requirements of obtaining a permit may be waived. The Executive Director of the Coastal Commission shall be notified of the type and location of the emergency action taken within three (3) days of the disaster or discovery of the danger, whichever occurs first. Within seven (7) days of taking such action, the Director shall send a written statement to the Coastal Commission of the reasons why the action was taken and verify that the action complied with the expenditure limits set forth in Public Resources Code Section 3061. C. Limitations. The Director shall not grant an Emergency Coastal Development Permit for any development that falls within an area in which the Coastal Commission retains direct permit review authority. In such areas, a request for an emergency authorization must be made to the Coastal Commission. D. Public Noticing. The Director shall provide public notice of the proposed emergency action. The extent and type of the notice shall be determined on the basis of the nature of the emergency. If the nature of the emergency does not allow sufficient time for public notice to be given before the emergency work begins, the Director shall provide public notice of the action taken, or being taken, as soon as is practical. Public notice of the nature of the emergency and the remedial actions to be taken shall be posted on the site in a conspicuous place, mailed to all persons the Director has reason to know would be interested in such action and to the Coastal Commission. E. Findings and Conditions. The Director may grant an Emergency Coastal Development Permit if it is found that: 1. An emergency exists that requires action more quickly than permitted by the procedures for a Coastal Development Permit and the work can and will be completed within thirty (30) days unless otherwise specified by the terms of the permit. 2 . Public comment on the proposed emergency action has been reviewed, if time allows. 3. The work proposed would be consistent with the requirements of the Certified Local Coastal Program. F. Expiration of Emergency Permit. An Emergency Coastal Development Permit shall be valid for sixty (60) days from the date of issuance by the Director. Prior to expiration of the emergency permit, the permittee must submit a regular Coastal Development Permit application for the development even if only to remove the development undertaken pursuant to the emergency permit and restore the site to its previous condition. G. Report to City Council and Coastal Commission. The Director shall report the granting of an emergency permit to the City Council at its next scheduled meeting. The report shall include a City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 16 Draft Implementing Ordinance • description of the nature of the emergency, the development involved and the person or entity undertaking the development. Copies of the report shall be available at the meeting and shall be mailed to the Coastal Commission and to all persons requesting such notification of local coastal development decisions. 17.37.200 Continuing Validity of Permit A Coastal Development Permit that is valid and in effect, and was granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall adhere to the land and continue to be valid upon change of ownership of the land or any existing building or structure on said land. 17.37.210 Local Coastal Program Amendments The City Council may amend all or part of the Local Coastal Program, but the amendment will not take effect until it has been certified by the Commission. Any General Plan Element or Specific Plan or ordinance of the City that is applicable to the Coastal Zone must be reviewed and amended as necessary to make the General Plan Element or Specific Plan or ordinance consistent with the rest of the Local Coastal Program. A. Initiation of Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. An amendment to the Local Coastal Program may be initiated by one of the following: 1 A resolution of intention initiated by the Planning Commission. 2. A resolution of intention initiated by the City Council directing the Planning Commission to initiate an amendment. 3. An application from a property owner or his/her authorized agent provided that such application involves the development or modification of property located within the area affected by such amendment. B. Planning Commission Action on Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. 1. Upon receipt of a completed amendment application or duly adopted resolution of intention, a public hearing before the Planning Commission must be held and notice of such hearing given consistent with the Coastal Act and California Code of Regulations. 2. The Planning Commission must make a written recommendation on the proposed amendment whether to approve, approve in modified form, or disapprove. 3. Planning Commission action recommending that the proposed Local Coastal Program amendment be approved, or approved in modified form, must be considered for adoption by the City Council. Planning Commission action disapproving a proposed Local Coastal Program amendment may be appealed by any interested person, including a Commissioner or Council member, per Section 17.37.130. C. City Council Action on Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. The recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve or deny a proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment, or the appeal from a decision by the Planning Commission shall be considered by the City Council. A public hearing on the amendment shall be conducted after first giving notice of the hearing pursuant to Section 17.37.080. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 17 Draft Implementing Ordinance D. Fees. A fee for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program shall be established by a resolution of the City Council. E. Coastal Commission Certification of Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. Any proposed Amendment to the Local Coastal Program shall not take effect until it has been certified by the Coastal Commission. Any amendment approved by the City shall be submitted to the Coastal Commission in accordance with Sections 30512 and 30513 of the Public Resources Code. An amendment to the certified Local Coastal Plan shall not become effective until the amendment is submitted pursuant to the requirements of Section 13551 of the California Code of Regulations and certified by the California Coastal Commission pursuant to Chapter 6, Article 2 of the California Coastal Act. 17.37.220 Encroachments An encroachment is defined as any structure, object, use or landscaping owned by a private property owner that is proposed to be located on or over public property. A. Encroachment Permits. 1. All encroachments shall be required to obtain an Encroachment Permit, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 12.16, as well as any necessary Coastal Development Permits, as detailed in this section. 2. Any application for encroachment in the Coastal Zone shall be evalugted for conformance with the policies of the California Coastal Act and the Certified Land Use Plan. 3. Access in the Coastal Zone along public rights-of-way, such as paved sidewalks and walk streets, shall be protected. No permanent device, structure, use, object or landscaping preventing public access along paved sidewalks shall be permitted. B. Outdoor Dining on Lower Pier Avenue. 1. Applications for outdoor dining on Pier Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and the Strand shall be subject to Section 12.16, Encroachments, of the Municipal Code. - 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of 17.37.220, A. above, applications for outdoor dining on Pier Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and the Strand shall not require a Coastal Development Permit as long as the provisions of Municipal Code section 12.16 are complied with. 17.37.230 Downtown Implementation Plan The recommendations of the Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan, October 1994, regarding the revitalization of the Downtown area shall be utilized as guidelines in the design and improvement of streetscape and roadway improvements along portions of Hermosa Avenue (8th Street to 15th Street) and Pier Avenue (The Strand to the Greenbelt). 17:37.240 Water Quality In order to reduce urban runoff and its potential impacts to the Coastal Zone, the City of Hermosa Beach has adopted Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 8.44. The requirements and standards of this section shall be applicable in the Coastal Zone. 17.37.250 Temporary/Special Events Calendar City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 18 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • The City of Hermosa Beach City Council adopts an annual calendar of major Temporary/Special Events. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 19 Draft Implementing Ordinance CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ZONING MAP LEGEND R-1 - ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-2 - TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R -2B - LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-3 - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R -P - RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL C-1 - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL C-2 - RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL C-3 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL M-1 - LIGHT MANUFACTURING OS - OPEN SPACE I / - PDR - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL: SPA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA UNCLASS - UNCLASSIFIED O - POTENTIAL ;1, 77 - SETBACK IN FEET FOR FRONT YARD ; / 2 REQUIREMENTS ,/ Coastal Zone Boundary OS - PROPOSED ZONING 1(a) 11171711: at City Limits --Add.r4:1 41 61.1.:1-54 E_Rt.thfld - • /111...,1 1 1. •-• 1=0. •1 7! • ;;11, 11 0r -7—n-7 1,111.•!..1.1 \ , ! • i ' ti , ; • -7 Lj k. I Li 1.1B-lit;47.' • --n- -8 • ; Local Coastal Program amendment areas. See the attached table for more detail. . • -i-,----maj; . - 'I •, !! • ' --,--,-",!..a!", 71 ! I ! l 0_, •.4.... ,,,,...... -, ... IV ii --7/1.., ll ii 1 I 1 / 1 I ll;" ; 1.1 .2. ; 0 .... ! ;II 1 ; .11 !i., ...,_—_, '-• z,--. - i ri IT I i ! I • 11 .." II 1 (s.,, a hi it 111'1'11. L, 0‘. ;'; • ; L =1.=.4 rz;:l: ; ; • tsp I .•., .011,-Dgpcv I ;•'; ---11--- • . ;04 • a if ..... s ; . 1 1 - - r • - • • A11).1 1 ‘• .11.11 ,, • • ,.; : f I OS • • • • . 1-rf 1 1.1 111 d a i rait-.21 ° • • itmej ,t • r-- ., 11 a ; ‘9. .:47; ILL -1 r—r-, • • L -t • • Appealable Area PREPARED BY: CV THE PLANNING CENTER PACIFIC OCEAN Original permit jurisdiction =MEI 0 200 400 LEGEND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GENERAL PLAN MAP HD - High Density Residential (33 du/ac) MD - Medium Density Residential (25 du/ac) LD - Low Density Residential (13 du/ac) SPA - Specific Plan Area GC - Commercial CC - Commercial Corridor NC - Neighborhood Commercial CR - Commercial Recreation MHP - Mobile Home Park IND - Industrial OS - Open Space Coastal Zone boundary • P.P.,11-1k*..........‘4‘ \ ') -9- .• • • " _ ; . ,.,...___. . . - — : 1 ::----i ir----ii------------71-4-1 t_,! 1 I d i.i , , ,,,,---.1.J.-___.-.,,,,,, • Cs \ ?i• ' cs City Limits • _ft jai ',Ill' 4(k 7 „ - 1 54 Local Coastal Program amendment areas. See the attached table for more detail. • , ,• ..1•••2 _ • • • . • . - • • 10(a), „ •„11 • 0, ' • 4.(6 r 1-17.11.1: Fri ri " 110 i -4i 1 -s7 -s • ! • I A arid rA p p IVA PrA IPA P Al VA fr OlerA ri Or Ord rfirei r A rA ore rA FA „A • p rAerAirAprA rid Appealable Area PACIFIC OCEAN PREPARED BY: co THE PLANNING CENTER Original permit jurisdiction 0' 200' 400' • • ZONE CHANGES AND GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGES IN THE COASTAL ZONE SINCE LUP CERTIFICATION (1981-1992) The following list identifies Zoning and General Plan map amendments that have been adopted by the City of Hermosa Beach, but not certified by the California Coastal Commission. The numbers and letters correspond to the locations indicated on the attached General Plan and Zoning maps. The date of City adoption is included in each heading. A brief statement describing the reasoning is included with each amendment. 1. 10/28/86 ZONE CHANGES: a) From R-2 to OS - Ingleside Park (Purpose: to make consistent with OS G.P. designation) b) From R-3 to R-2 - NW corner of 2nd St.Nalley Dr. (Purpose: to make consistent with MD G.P. designation) c) From R-3 to OS - SW corner of 8th St.Nalley Dr. (Purpose: to make consistent with OC G.P. designation) 2. 1/13/87 ZONE CHANGES: a) From C-1 to R-3 - NE corner of 2nd Street/Hermosa Ave. (Purpose: to make consistent with HD G.P. designation) 3. 1/27/87 GENERAL PLAN CHANGES a) From HD to NC - E side of Hermosa Ave. S of First St. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-7 zoning) b) From MD to HD - W side of Hermosa Ave. S of 1st St. (Purpose: to make consistent with R-3 zoning) c) From HD to NC - W side of Hermosa Ave. 1st St to 3rd Ct. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-1 zoning) d) From HD to NC - SE corner of Hermosa Ave/2nd St. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-1 zoning and existing use) e) From HD to MD - Both sides Loma Dr, S of 8th St (Purpose: to make consistent with R-2 zoning) 4. 10/13/87 GENERAL PLAN CHANGES a) From HD to GC - NW corner of Hermosa Ave/15th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-2 zoning) b) From MD to LD - W side Manhattan Ave. 19th to 22nd St. (Purpose: to make consistent with R-1 zoning) c) From MD to NC - SW corner Hermosa Ave/22nd St (Purpose: to make consistent with C-1 zoning) d) From MD to LD - Along The Strand, N of 22nd St. (Purpose: to make consistent with R-1 zoning) e) From MD to LD - Manhattan Ave, 24th St to 26th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with R-1 zoning) f) From MD to NC - NE corner of 27th St/Manhattan Ave. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-1 zoning) City of Hermosa Beach 4/5/00 Map Amendments g) From HD to NC - zoning) h) From MD to NC zoning) • • W side of Manhattan from 31st to 33rd St. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-1 - E side of Manhattan from 31st to 33rd St. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-1 i) From MD to LD - zoning) 1) From MD to LD - with R-1 zoning) E of Manhattan from 30th St. to Longfellow (Purpose: to make consistent with R-1 N side of Gould Ave. from Morningside to Valley Dr. (Purpose: to make consistent • k) From MD to LD - E side Loma, S of 19th Street 5. 3/8/88 ZONE CHANGES a) From R-3 to R-2 - E side Hermosa Ave from 16th to 26th Street & W side from 21st to 24th St. & W side Manhattan from 16th to 19th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with MD) b) From R-3 to R-2 - E side of Loma Drive, N of 16th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with MD General Plan) c) From R-3 to R-2 - Between Strand and Hermosa Ave. from 8th St. to 10th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with MD) 6. 5/24/88 ZONE CHANGES a) From R-2 to R-1 - Area N and E of Monterey Blvd. to North School (Purpose: to make consistent with LD General Plan) 7. 11/22/88 ZONE CHANGES: a) From R-2 to R-1 A - Both sides of 25th St. W of Valley Dr. (Purpose: to make consistent with LD General Plan) 8. 1/10/89 GENERAL PLAN CHANGE AND ZONE CHANGE: a) From MD to LD and from R-2 to R-1 - W side of Myrtle between 24th and 25th Street (Purpose: to lower intensity consistent with changes to east --see 7(a)) 9. 1/10/89 GENERAL PLAN CHANGE: a) From GC to HD - W of commercial areas W of Pier Ave. E of Manhattan and E. of Monterey (Purpose: to make consistent with R-3 zoning) 10. 10/10/89 GENERAL PLAN CHANGES: a) From OS to IND - NW corner of Valley Dr/6th Street (Purpose: to make consistent with M-1 zoning and historical use) b) From HD to IND - 1 lot W side of Cypress, 725 Cypress (Purpose: to make consistent with M-1 zoning and existing use) c) From GC to MD - W side Hermosa from 8th St. to 9th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with R-2 zoning and existing use) City of Hermosa Beach 4/5/00 2 Map Amendments • d) From GC to HD - North side 10th St. W of Hermosa Avenue (Purpose: to make consistent with R-3 zoning and existing uses) e) From GC to HD - W side Manhattan Ave from 10th St. to Pier (Purpose: to make consistent with existing use, also see 11(a)) f) From HD and OS to IND - W side Valley Dr. S. of City Hall (Purpose: to make consistent with M-1 zone and existing use) g) From HD to GC - W side Bard S. of Pier (Purpose: to make consistent with existing uses, see 11(b)) h) From CR to HD - S side 15th Street W. of Hermosa Ave (Purpose: to make consistent with R-3 zoning and existing uses) i) From GC to HD - 1 lot N of 15th St, 85 15th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with R-3 zoning and existing use) J) From MD to NC - Commercial areas along both sides of Greenwich Village Dr. (Purpose: to make consistent with C-1 and zoning and existing uses.) 11. 10/24/89 ZONE CHANGES: a) From R -P to R-3 - W side of Manhattan Ave. from 10th St. to Pier Ave. (Purpose: to make consistent with GP change, see 10 fe)) b) From M-1 to C-2 - W side of Bard, S of Pier (Purpose: to make consistent with existing and with GP change, see 10(g) c) From C-2 to R -2B - W side of Hermosa Ave from 15th Ct to 17th Ct (Purpose: to make consistent with MD and existing uses) d) From R-3 to R-2 - E side of Manhattan Ave from 26th to 27th St. (Purpose: to make consistent with MD general plan) e) From C-1 to R-2 - Residential areas along Greenwich Village drive (Purpose: to make consistent with MD and existing uses) f) From C-1 to R-2 - NE corner Manhattan Ave/33rd St. (Purpose: to make consistent with MD general plan and existing use) g) From C-1 to R-3 - NW corner Manhattan Ave/33rd St. (Purpose: to. make consistent with HD general plan and existing use) 12. ZONE CHANGES/GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS ALREADY APPROVED BY COASTAL COMMISSION AS AMENDMENTS TO LUP a) General Plan Amendment From OS to HD and zone change from unclassified to R-3PD - South School site Monterey Blvd frontage (City Council approval 10/2/84) b) Biltmore Site: General Plan Amendment from a specific plan area a hotel to part CR and part MD residential; Zone change from specific plan for hotel to a specific plan area for 30% tourist oriented commercial, and 70% Residential C) B 11 %Moine — D S . City of Hermosa Beach 4/5/00 3 Map Amendments • • MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON APRIL 5, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perrotti at 7:10 p.m. Commissioner Hoffman led the pledge of allegiance. Roll Call Present: Absent: Also Present: Commissioners Hoffman, Ketz, Schwartz, Pizer, Chairman Perrotti None Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director Ken Robertson, Associate Planner Brian James, Planning Center Diane Cleary, Recording Secretary Commissioner Perrotti announced that the library will reopen tomorrow at noon. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. C-31 — COMPLETION OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT. INCLUDES AMENDING THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN, AND A TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADOPT REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES OF THE LAND USE PLAN AND COASTAL ACT. WILL RESULT IN THE CITY OBTAINING PERMIT AUTHORITY FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 21, 2000 MEETING). Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of amendments to the Coastal Land Use Plan and adoption of the implementing ordinance. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report. He said that based on input received from the Planning Commission at the March 21, 2000 meeting, staff has made several changes to the attached documents. He stated also,, several additional changes were incorporated pursuant to the input of the City Attorney. He said at this time staff is recommending that these documents be forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. Also, staff will draft a resolution for the Commission's adoption at the next meeting. The following changes in the Certified land Use Plan were reviewed and discussed: I. "Background" replaced with "Local Coastal Program Preparation." • First paragraph — deleted. 1 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • New wording — added. II. Parking and Access Summary B. Goals and Objectives 2. New wording — "To maintain adequate parking space for visitors, shoppers and beach -goers." 3. New wording — "To facilitate easy access to work-related parking for merchants." 6. New wording — "To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian oriented downtown business and visitor serving area, which are less than a typical commercial area because of its proximity to a regional bike path and to high density residential areas, and to continue to explore and encourage new sources of parking, parking strategies, transit options, and alternative means of travel as alternatives to providing parking on-site for new development. C. Policies and Programs 1. Existing Policies and Programs • Policy — Corrected wording — "In the pedestrian oriented downtown commercial district, alternatives to providing parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowed to encourage alternatives to using motorized vehicles and to encourage improvement and enhancement of visitor -serving business activities." • Program - Remove the second "Program." • Program - New wording — "Public parking will continue to be provided to beach visitors on the Greenbelt between 8th and 11th Streets, east side of Valley Drive, adjacent to Clark stadium." • Additional policies and programs added from the Coastal Development Permit. (Preferential Parking Program) • Policy — New wording = "Maintain a supply of parking that balances between long-term (beach user) and short-term (shoppers) parking in the downtown area to provide an adequate and flexible number of parking spaces to satisfy beach user and commercial demand." • Program — New wording — "Public parking is provided in the North Pier parking structure, public parking lots, and on the street. The rates for parking at these downtown parking facilities will continue to be flexibly structured, recognizing seasonal and locational demands, to encourage an efficient balance between beach users, visitor -serving commercial uses, and other commercial demand." • Program — New wording — "The City had commissioned a study to develop a downtown parking plan." • Policy — A "Program" should follow and be added. 2. Exceptions 2 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • Policy — New wording — "Minimize parking impacts by encouraging a mix of visitor -serving and other commercial uses that balances peak and non -peak parking demand that occurs during the day and seasonally." • Program— New wording — "For new retail and office development or expansions of existing retail and office development within the DED, required parking in excess of that existing on the site shall be provided at 65% of the current parking requirement." • Program — The wording "The DEC, or its successor agency or the private party" deleted and replaced with "City Council." • Program — New wording added — "and the City shall construct new parking upon reaching that threshold limit or the City shall not accept any fees in -lieu of parking beyond that threshold limit." • Program — deleted. • Policy — deleted. • Program — deleted. 2. Future Policies • Policy — deleted. • Policy — deleted. • Policy — New Wording — "That the City should maximize the efficiency of parking and public parking lots dispersed throughout the City and downtown enhancement district so as to minimize the impact on the parking demand to the City and its residents, and consider the possibility of lease or purchase of parking lots when the opportunity arises." • Policy — deleted. III. Coastal Housing — Deleted. III. Coastal Recreational Access C. Policies and Programs 1. Existing Policies and Programs • Policy — Corrected wording — "That the City should restrict buildings and structures on the beach with regards to size and number consistent with current access, safety, and beach usage. Police -Lifeguard structures should be held to a minimum both in size and number consistent with good safety practices." • Policy — Corrected wording — "Appendix C." 2. Future Policies and Programs • Policy — deleted. is • Policy — Wording kept in place — "That the City should, in conjunction with the City of Manhattan Beach, create a continuous and seamless beachfront bicycle and pedestrian path between the two cities." • Policy — The wording "recently constructed" — deleted. IV. Coastal Development and Design 3 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • B. Goals and Objectives 4. Wording corrected — "To continue to develop facilities that serve the needs of both coastal visitors and the City's residents." C. Policies and Programs 1. Existing Policies and Programs • Policy — New wording — "Development in the Coastal Zone will be reviewed and permitted pursuant to the provisions of the Coastal Act and the policies and implementation programs of the City's Local Coastal Program." • Program — New wording — "The City began the process to resolve inconsistencies between the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map in 1981, and resolved the inconsistencies within the Coastal Zone by 1990." • Policy — New wording — "The City should continue to maintain high standards of design for public works projects and public improvement programs, including the redevelopment of the streetscape at upper and lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue in the downtown area." • Program — New wording — "The City will continue to utilize the City of Hermosa Beach Downtown implementation Plan dated October 1994, as a guideline for theadesign and development of the streetscape at upper and lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue." • Policy — New wording — "Encourage the preservation of the City's historic buildings and cultural heritage." • Program — New wording — "In November 1998 the City conducted a survey of historic resources, adopted a historic preservation ordinance, and designated a historic landmark." 2. Future Policies and Programs • Policy — New wording — "The Zone Code will be examined to remove unnecessary impediments to the rehabilitation of existing commercial and residential structures." • Policy — New wording — "Encourage visitor -serving commercial land uses within the downtown area." • Policy — New wording — "The Biltmore Site is a vital asset of the people of Hermosa Beach. This coastal site is designated public open space and beach public parking." • Program — New wording — "The certified land use designations for the publicly owned property known as Noble Park are as follows (Amended by vote of the people November 5, 1992)." "1. The designation for the property specifically known as Noble Park is Restricted Open Space (O -S-2), to ensure its preservation and use as a public park." "2. The designation for that part of the Biltmore Site known as Noble Park is commercial/Public Beach Parking." The following changes in the Implementing Ordinance were reviewed and discussed: 4 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • 17.37.010 - Purpose • "and use plans" replaced with "The General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and any." 17.37.020 - Definitions • A space added between "the" and "Coastal." • "Aggrieved Person" deleted. Appealable Development 2. "a project or" deleted. 3. "or General Plan" added. • "Bulk" definition deleted. • Coastal Development Permit — "certificate" replaced with "permit." • Coastal Policy Checklist — "relevant" added. • "Disaster" definition deleted. • "Historic structure" definition deleted. • "Major energy facility" definition deleted. • "Public works" definition deleted. • "Sea" definition deleted. • "Project" definition deleted. • "Sensitive Coastal Resource Areas" - The Commission agreed to keep this section in the Ordinance. • "Special District" definition deleted. • "Structure" definition deleted. • "Temporary/Special Event" — • "an exclusive use of a sandy beach, parkland, water, streets or parking area which is otherwise open and available for general public use and/or" — deleted. • "and/or exclusive use of a sandy beach, parkland, water, streets or parking area which is otherwise open and available for general public use. "Exclusive use" means a use that precludes use in the area of the event for public recreation, beach access or access to coastal waters other than for or through the event itself' — added. 17.37.040 - Exemptions and Categorical Exclusions A. Exemptions lb. "between the sea and the first public roadway paralleling the sea, or within three hundred (300) feet of the inland extent to the beach, whichever is greater" — deleted. "in the appealable area" — added. 3. "shoreline protective works or docks" — deleted. 1 d. Deleted. le. Deleted. 3a. "bluff retaining wall" — deleted. 6. Deleted. 8. Deleted and put in the definition section. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following are exempt — First paragraph — deleted. 4d. Relocated to Section 17.37.224. 5 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • B. Categorical Exclusions 5c. "Entertainment/specific event permits." — deleted. 5d. "Minor" — deleted. "building" — added. This item now becomes "c." 6b2.= "building" replaced with "business." 17.37.050 - Coastal Development Permit Applications B. Burden of Proof — New wording — "The applicant shall state in the application how:" C. Refusal of Acceptance of Application for Lack of Information — "Deny" replaced with "reject." D. Concurrent Filing — New wording — "A Coastal Development Permit shall be considered concurrently with any other discretionary permits required for the project by the City. 17.37.080 - Coastal Development Permit Notice Requirements A2. New wording — "In Appealable Areas: Property owners and occupants of commercial and residential property located within a 300 -foot radius." A3. "residents" replaced with "occupants of commercial and residential property." B7. "decision" replaced with "description." B8. "system" replaced with "procedure." 17.37.090 - Coastal Development Permit Public Hearings A. New wording — "Hearing. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review and consider an application for a Coastal Development Permit." B. Deleted. 17.37.100 - Coastal Development Permit Approval or Denial Findings B. New wording — "An application for a Coastal Development Permit shall be denied where the evidence fails to substantiate the basis for approval contained in Section 17.37.100A." 17.37.120 - Notice of Action and Appeal Rights D. Deleted. Sections 17.37.130 and 17.37.140 — Deleted and reorganized. 17.37.140 - Appeals A. Add a period. B 1. New wording — "The City Council may initiate a review of the decision of the Planning Commission at the City Council meeting succeeding the Planning Commission action pursuant to Section 2.52.040." B3. Add a period. Appeals to the Coastal Commission — Becomes "C." C2a. Add "or" and a period. C2b. "or a major energy facility" — deleted. C3a. Add "or" and a period. C3b. Add a period. 6 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • C5. Add a period. 17.37.150 — Expiration of Unused Permits A3. Remove the word "for" after "low-income housing." 17.37.160 — Amendments to Coastal Development Permits A. "As stated in Section 17.37.030, the approving authority shall amend a Coastal Development Permit" — deleted. C. "in the Director's opinion, the proposed amendment" and "lessen or void the effect of' — deleted. D2. "a Coastal Development Permit Amendment is required per 17.37.160.A." — added. 17.37.180 — Revocation of Coastal Development Permits A2. Deleted. B. New wording — "The City may initiate proceedings to revoke a permit based on evidence submitted..." "The Director may initiate revocation proceedings when the grounds for revocation have been established" — deleted. C. New wording — "Where the Director determines that grounds exist for revocation of a Coastal Development Permit, the operation of the permit shall be reviewed and be automatically suspended if it is a threat to public health and safety." 17.37.220 — Local Coastal Program Amendments C. "must be acted upon" replaced with "shall be considered." 17.37.224 — Temporary/Special Events Calendar - added. The Commission took a break at 8:40 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 8:50 p.m. Brian James of the Planning Center presented a matrix in which, he stated, justifies all the changes and describes the implementation of the Coastal Act. He said that the second column is the applicable Coast Act Policy and the third column is from the Land Use Plan which is existing today. He said that the existing implementation column describes how the policies are implemented through the Zoning Code. He noted that the last column has any recommendations and changes discussed in the LUP. He reviewed the following changes: Row 3 Continued, page 4 — The wording - "If the downtown business area enhancement district commission determines that the private party is responsible for the in lieu fee, the private party shall pay said fee as requested by the City Council" should remain. 7 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • Row 9 Continued, page 8 - 17-44-040 Parking Requirements for the Downtown Area A. Replace with the language out of the LUP shown on page 5. 17.44210 Parking plans — This section will be -merged into the Parking Plan Section. 17.44.140 — This change will reflect changes in the LUP. Row 12, page 11 — 17.44.190 — This change will reflect changes in the LUP. Row 25, page 17 — 17.06.060D — This section could be updated and "railroad right-of-way" could be changed to "greenbelt." The last sentence could also be eliminated. Row 27, page 18 — Recommendation to designate as open space on the Zoning Map. Director Blumenfeld stated that a Resolution has been prepared and staff is recommending that the Commission approve the Coastal Land Use Plan and adopt the Implementing Ordinance. He noted a change on line 28 of the Resolution which should read, "Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.9." Commissioner Schwartz questioned why the Commission is taking on the added responsibility, risk and cost regarding the Local Coastal Program. Director Blumenfeld pointed out that by the City obtaining coastal authority, anyone doing an improvement or obtaining a discretionary permit in the coastal zone will be helped tremendously due to time and cost savings in doing a project. He said that in speaking to other cities, there has not been a dramatic increase in the amount of work involved. He said additional costs would have to be recovered, and a coastal checklist would need to be provided along with cycling on notification to Coastal. He said, however, there should be greater benefits, which would justify the approval of the program. Commissioner Pizer suggested that the fees and structure should be considered to allow the City to be profitable. Further, he noted that half of the area of Hermosa Beach is in the coastal area. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Pizer, to APPROVE the amendments to the Coastal Land Use Plan and ADOPT the implementing ordinance, as amended. AYES: Hoffman, Ketz, Schwartz, Pizer, Chairman Perrotti NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Commissioner Ketz to ADJOURN the meeting at 9:10 pm. 8 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • No objections, so ordered. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the special scheduled meeting of April 5, 2000. Sam Perrotti, Chairman Sol Blumenfeld, Secretary Date 9 P.C. Minutes 04-05-00 • • MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON MARCH 21, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS T e e meeting was called to order by Chairman Perrotti at 7:05 p.m. Comma 'oner Ketz led the pledge of allegiance. Roll Call Present: Commioners Hoffman, Ketz, Schwartz*, Pizer, Chairman Pe Absent: None Also Present: Sol Blumenfe Community Development Director Michael Schubac , City Planner Diane Cleary, Recor•' it Secretary *Arrived at 725 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION by Commissioner Pizer, seco Consent Calendar. d by Comma 'oner Hoffman, to APPROVE the AYES: Hoffman, Pizer ' airman Perrotti NOES: None ABSENT: Schwart ABSTAIN: - Vice ' air Ketz 6. 0/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Non7 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. C-31 — COMPLETION OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT. INCLUDES AMENDING THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN, AND A TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADOPT REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES OF THE LAND USE PLAN AND COASTAL ACT. WILL RESULT IN THE CITY OBTAINING PERMIT AUTHORITY FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE. • Staff Recommended Action: To take public testimony, review the Coastal Land Use Plan and continue to a special meeting of the Planning Commission on April 5, 2000. 1 P.C. Minutes 03-21-00 3 • • Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report. He indicated that the Coastal Act sets out regulations which guide the development of coastal resources. He said the State maintains authority over the City's coastal regulations until such time as the City incorporates the goals of the Coastal Act into their local regulations. He also said that the purpose of the draft amendments will be to obtain certification on the City's local coastal program. He indicated that last year, the City submitted a grant request to the California Coastal Commission and the City was awarded a grant to obtain funding to help the City prepare their local coastal program. With the approval of the documents being considered this evening, a subsequent decision hearing will be held the first week of April with a final consideration by the City Council. He said the matter will then be referred to the Coastal Commission for consideration and if approved, the Implementing Ordinance would be incorporated in the Zoning Ordinance as part of the City's local regulations. He explained that while the City will retain coastal authority the Coastal Commission will still retain some of its permitting authority relative to the area known as the original permit jurisdiction area and appealable area. He indicated that all the properties within the Coastal Zone designated area would receive a CZ Coastal Zone designation appended to the standard designation. He also explained that the development standards within the City's Coastal Zone would largely remain unchanged with the Implementing Ordinance simply mirroring the Zoning Ordinance with respect to development standards. Director Blumenfeld also noted that there are strikeouts (indicates areas in the Land Use Plan proposed for deletion) or areas underlined (indicates areas recommended for addition) in the documents received by the Commission. He further pointed out that after the draft was published, areas were picked up that required further refinement and clarification. He noted the following changes in the Land Use Plan: Page 4 — Delete the reference to the Downtown Implementation Plan relative to parking. Page 5 — Delete the reference to lease or purchase of parking resources and substitute with, "The City should maximize efficiency of parking in parking lots disbursed throughout the City and Downtown Enhancement District so as to minimize impact on parking demand to the City and its residents." Page 9 — Change paragraph 3 to read, "That whatever designation had the lessor designation." He reviewed that the Commission has received a Land Use Plan with corrections and revisions, an Implementing Ordinance and a matrix provided for comparison purposes. Brian James of the Planning Center presented a brief overview and presented the following for discussion: The purpose of the Coastal Act • Protecting the marine environment • Assuring that there is a balance between the development and utilization of the coastline and its conservation • Maximizing public access as well as recreational opportunities • Providing priority for coastal dependent development 2 P.C. Minutes 03-21-00 r 40 The Local Coastal Program • The Land Use Plan • Implementing Ordinance • Coastal Zone established by the Coastal Act • Coastal Boundaries • Authority to issue the Coastal Development Permits • Create a more customer friendly atmosphere • Streamline the permitting process • Appealable area • Non -appealable area • Subject to the Coastal Act • Categorically excluded • Exempt • Require a Coastal Development Permit • Comparison of today's process and the proposed process • Proposed amendments to the Land Use Plan • Parking and access section • Coastal housing portion • Coastal recreation section • Coastal development and design • General Plan amendments and Zoning Map amendments not certified by the Coastal Commission • Zoning category for the beach Chairman Perrotti questioned the status of a lot that is part of an appealable area. Mr. James clarified that if only a portion of the lot is in the appealable area, the entire lot would be considered an appealable area. Commissioner Schwartz asked if prior comments and input into the original plan are still relevant today. Director Blumenfeld said this project has been initiated now because the Coastal Commission provided a grant to the City to provide the resources to complete the work. He further explained that the Coastal Program consists of the LUP and the Implementing Ordinance, and there was not an Implementing Ordinance prior to this time. He further pointed out that the original wording was left intact, with minor amendments made to the language and noted that much of the document is still relevant. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the railroad right-of-way on page 3 of the Land Use Plan. Director Blumenfeld indicated that this is the greenbelt area and refers to parking near the fields. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the VPD on page 3 of the Land Use Plan. Director Blumenfeld noted that the definition will be put back in before the abbreviation. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the language on page 4 of the Land Use Plan stating, "For new or expansions of existing retail and office development within the DED parking in excess of 3 P.C. Minutes 03-21-00 • • that existing on the site at the time of the proposal shall be provided at 65% of the current parking requirement." Director Blumenfeld clarified that this section is proposed to be added. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the language on page 5 of the Land Use Plan stating, "and the City shall construct new parking upon reaching that threshold limit or the City shall not approve new development beyond that threshold limit." Director Blumenfeld indicated that the City currently has an in lieu program which was based upon replenishing the parking that the City was granting in lieu after a certain threshold which was set at 100 spaces. He said the downtown parking has currently been replenished at 300 spaces. He said staff now has the ability to go forward with the in lieu program with a new threshold again of approximately 100 in lieu spaces. Director Blumenfeld noted that on page 5 of the Land Use Plan, leasing or purchasing parking is being deleted. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the language on page 7 of the Land Use Plan stating, "That the City should separate Strand uses that add to the congestion on the Strand between 10th and 15th Streets during the summer months." Director Blumenfeld explained that this suggests that some safety measures have been implemented. He agreed that this language may be better addressed in the paragraph above, Existing Policies and Programs. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the language on page 8 of the Land Use Plan stating, "The City, where feasible, should construct parkettes and pedestrian spaces similar to the one recently constructed at 13th, 14th and 15th Streets and Beach Drive." Director Blumenfeld noted that 13th and 14th Streets have special paving and landscaping that mirrors the Pier Plaza. Commissioner Schwartz requested clarification of the second program on page 9 of the Land Use Plan and asked if the Zoning Code and the General Plan have conformed. Director Blumenfeld stated no and that there are some inconsistent parcels. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the first policy under Future Policies and Programs on page 9 of the land Use Plan should be under Existing Policies and Programs. Director Blumenfeld indicated yes. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the third policy on page 10 of the Land Use Plan and asked if landscaping is feasible along the east side of the Strand. Mr. James commented that the parkettes in the previous policy could be an example. Director Blumenfeld further stated that any of the streets terminating at the Strand present this option. Commissioner Schwartz asked what is the exception and non -exception concerning Item 6 on page 7 of the Draft Implementing Ordinance. Mr. James explained that if you are converting these multiple unit residential structures to timeshares, this would be excluded from obtaining a Coastal Development Permit. He further indicated that he will check the applicability of condominiums. 4 P.C. Minutes 03-21-00 • • Commissioner Schwartz questioned the process of the public hearing before the Planning Commission regarding Item B, Appeal of a Non -Discretionary Project, on page 12 of the Draft Implementing Ordinance. Mr. James explained that if the item is appealed, it would go through City Council and then go to the Coastal Commission. Commissioner Schwartz questioned Item D, Continuation of Action, on page 12 of the Draft Implementing Ordinance and the limit of the continuation of public hearings. Director Blumenfeld said there is a process for timely review of projects that relates to permit streamlining, but there is not a set limit of public hearings and the Commission does it by policy. Commissioner Schwartz noted a typo on Item C, Local Appeals, on page 14 of the Draft Implementing Ordinance, "Action by the Director or may be appealed to the Planning Commission." Commissioner Schwartz questioned what is appealable regarding Item F, Grounds for Appeal, on page 14 of the Draft Implementing Ordinance. Director Blumenfeld explained that anything can be appealed to City Council, but this section sets the grounds for appeal to the Coastal Commission. Commissioner Schwartz questioned the difference between an immaterial and material change under Item D, Action on Amendments, on page 16 of the Draft Implementing Ordinance. Mr. James said that the noticing is similar, but he noted the differences will be made more distinct. Commissioner Schwartz requested an explanation of Enforcement, on page 17 of the Draft Implementing Ordinance. Director Blumenfeld indicated authority along with responsibility is transferred with additional work involved. He further said that the vehicle for processing the appeals needs to be looked at and monitored. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing. Chairman Perrotti reminded the public that written correspondence can be sent into the City, the Commission is not making a final decision this evening and this item will be continued to April 5, 2000. Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Ketz, seconded by Commissioner Pizer, to CONTINUE C-31— Completion of the Local Coastal Program pursuant to the California Coastal Act, to the April 5, 2000 meeting. AYES: = Hoffman, Ketz, Schwartz, Pizer, Chairman Perrotti NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The Commission took a break at 8:10 p.m. 5 P.C. Minutes 03-21-00 STOP OIL 610 Sixth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Telephone: 310-379-5698 Facsimile: 310-376-1298 Email: hmyd37a@prodigy.com Fair Political Practice: ID# 8919340 • • April 4, 2000 Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Civic Center Hermosa Beach CA 90254 c-Qc Cra Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: Attached is the Supplemental Safety Report prepared and adopted by the County of Santa Barbara. This action made Santa Barbara's already strict regulations of hazardous material even more restrictive. I urge you to consider adopting some of these regulations as appropriate into Hermosa Beach's Local Coastal Plan. This would ensure that any applicant for an LCP for undertaking production and transport of hazardous materials such as oil drilling and natural gas handling would be subject to these guidelines. My best, Rem inawetd'Odavue gam Rosamond d'Orlaque Fogg Copy: Stephen Burrell, HB City Manager Michael Jenkins, HB City Attorney IA/nheifn• hftn•//hnmel nfn nnf/hmend/hnlninn/nil/ofnnnil hfm • Safety Element Supplement February 1, 2000 • . Table of Contents PART A: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INTRODUCTION GOALS DEFINITIONS , CHAPTER I: HAZARDOUS FACILITIES , APPLICABILITY OBJECTVES & POLICIES , Objective 1, Policy Hazardous Facility Safety 1-A, Risk Estimates Objective 2 Policy Hazardous Facility Safety 2-A, Unacceptable Risk Involving New Development Policy Hazardous Facility Safety 2-B, Unacceptable Risk Involving Modifications to Existing Development. Objective 3 Policy Hazardous Facility Safety 3-A, Siting] Policy Hazardous Facility Safety 3-B, Encroachment] Policy Hazardous Facility Safety 3-C, Mitigation] CHAPTER II: GAS PIPELINES] APPLICABILITY] OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES] Objective 1] Policy Gas Pipeline Safety I -A, Inventory I Policy Gas Pipeline Safety I -B, Risk Estimates I Objective 2 1 Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 2-A, Unacceptable Risk Involving New Development 1 Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 2-B, Unacceptable Risk Involving Modifications to Existing Development I Objective 3 1 Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 3-A, Routing I Safety Element Supplenient Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 3-B, Encroachment Objective 4 Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 4-A, Safe Design Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 4-B, Safe Operations Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 4-C, Reduced Hazard Zones Objective 5 Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 5-A, Consultation with Pipeline Operators Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 5-B, Setbacks' Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 5-C, Burial Depth Policy Gas Pipeline Safety 5-0, Marking Pipeline Presence Safety Element Supplement P ART A: HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INTRODUCTION Both California planning law and the California Environmental Quality Act emphasize the importance of protecting public safety through proactive land -use planning. Since 1971, Government Code Section 65302(g) has required local governments to prepare a Safety Element as part of their General Plans. This element, according to statute, addresses protection of the community from any unreasonable risks associated with the effects of seismically induced hazards, other geologic hazards (e.g., landslides and subsidence), flooding, and fires (both urban and wild land). California's General Plan Guidelines describe the Safety Element as the primary vehicle for identifying hazards that cities and counties must consider when making land -use decisions. The Guidelines specify that the number and types of hazards depend in part on local circumstances, noting: "While the safety element focuses on identifying fire and geologic hazards, it may also address other locally relevant safety issues such as vehicle accidents, hazardous materials spills, power failure, and storm drainage. II The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) sets forth a legal framework for identifying significant effects on the environment. Among other criteria, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly (Public Resources; Code Section 21083(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(a) and (b)). Accordingly, Santa Barbara County's Environmental Thresholds and Guidelines Manual includes thresholds to define the significance of public exposure to acute risks posed by certain types of facilities or activities that involve hazardous materials. These policies require mitigation of any proposed development with significant, adverse effects or denial of the project. Part A of this supplement to Santa Barbara County's Safety Element focuses on the role of land -use planning in reducing the risk of public exposure to acutely hazardous materials. It draws upon the County's own experiences and recommended practices of other informed sources to guide consistent and well-informed land -use decisions with regard to public safety. Chapter I addresses facilities that handle acutely hazardous materials and are fixed in location to a single site; such facilities' represent a single -point source of risk (e.g., a gas processing facility, or storage of gaseous chlorine at a water treatment plant). Chapter n addresses gas pipelines, which are considered to be fixed in location to a corridor and, thus, represent a linear source of risk, which extends along the corridor. GOALS The objectives and policies contained in these chapters address the following two goals: (1) To provide sufficient guidance to affect well-informed, consistent and equitable land -use decisions; and Safety Element Supplement. Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 1 Adopted- February 1, 2000- Resolution 00-56 Page 1 of 18 • • (2) To prevent and minimize unnecessary risk to the public, recognizing it is impossible to obtain a zero -risk society. DEFINITIONS The following definitions are included herein to clarify the policies of Part A of the Safety Element Supplement and do not automatically extend to other elements of the County's Comprehensive Plan or any chapter of the County Codes. ACUTE HAZARD: A hazard that can have either an immediate or delayed effect (with short-term or prolonged consequences) due to a single exposure to an accident, such as exposure to a gas explosion, fireball, or a release of an acutely toxic material. ACUTELY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: In general, materials that pose an acute hazard. Acutely hazardous materials addressed in this supplement are defined within each chapter. ASSOCIATED GAS: Gas that occurs with oil, either as free gas or in solution. Gas occurring alone in a reservoir is unassociated gas. EXTERNAL FORCE: Third -party intrusions into the pipeline corridor earth movements (including scouring, and earthquakes). GAS PRODUCING WELL: Any well for the exploration (prospect), extraction, or injection of gas except for wells used by a public utility to inject or withdraw from an underground storage reservoir. HAZARD ZONE: The area around the source of a hazard that exposes the public to a significant risk, pursuant to the public safety thresholds found in the County's Environmental Thresholds and Guidelines Manual. HAZARDOUS FACILITIES : Facilities fixed in a single location that contain acutely hazardous materials with the potential to pose a significant, acute risk to public safety beyond the facility's boundaries. Hazardous facilities may include gas production, as well as other facilities that handle specified quantities of regulated substances (pursuant to Title 19, California Code of Regulations, Division 2, Chapter 4.5). . HEAVIER GAS LIQUIDS: The heavier fractions of natural gas liquids which are extracted as a marketable byproduct during oil and gas processing, and consist of pentanes, hexanes, and heavier components, including natural gasoline. HIGHL Y SENSITIVE LAND USES: Land uses that meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Land uses whose onsite population cannot be readily evacuated or otherwise adequately protected from serious harm through methods such as sheltering in-place. They include schools (through grade 12), hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, multiple -family housing exclusively for the elderly or handicapped, stadiums, and arenas, but do not extend to Family Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 2 Adopted -February 1, 2000-Reso/ution 00-56 Page 2 of 18 Day Care if residential subdivisions per se ar nsidered to be compatible with the hazardouslility in question. (b) Land uses that serve critical "lifeline" functions such as water supplies if exposed to a significant risk that will curtail its lifeline function for a critical period of time. (c) Other types of other land uses, such as high-density residential development, may also be determined to be incompatible in vicinity to an existing or proposed hazardous facility. INHERENTL Y SAFER DESIGN: Strategies discussed in the Center of Chemical Process Safety's publication, Jnherently Safer Chemical Processes (1996). Includes feasible alternative equipment, processes, materials, lay -outs, and procedures meant to eliminate, minimize, or reduce the risk of major chemical accident or release by modifying a process rather than adding external layers of protection (see primary prevention below). LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GASES (LPGS): The lighter fractions of natural gas liquids which are extracted, as a marketable byproduct during gas production or processing, liquefied under pressure, and cons primarily of propane and butane. MAXIMUM ALLOW ABLE OPERA TING PRESSURE: The highest pressure at which a pipeline can be operated, considering design and regulatory factors. NATURAL GAS: Hydrocarbons which, at atmospheric conditions of temperature and pressure, large are in a gaseous phase (although gas liquids and liquid impurities may be present as a another phase: in the gas stream) and are used as a source of energy. NATURAL GAS GATHERING PIPELINES: Gas pipelines upstream of final processing or, when no processing is required, upstream of the Lease Automatic Custody Transfer meter. NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS (NGLS): Hydrocarbons which are separated from natural gas at the surface in field facilities or in gas processing plants, and include propane, butane, and heavier fractions. NATURAL GAS TRANSMItSION PIPELINES: Pipelines that transmit gas offsite from final processing 0] when no processing is required, downstream of the Lease Automatic Custody Transfer or product] site, to a distribution network operated by a public utility or, if the gas is not delivered through a public utility's network, then to an end use, injection well, or flare. POPULATED AREA: An area characterized by land uses other than agriculture, open -space (including undeveloped, infrequently visited parkland), or hazardous facilities of similar nature (including onshore oil field operations and consolidated sites for oil/gas facilities), considering both present and reasonably anticipated future development. Populated areas also incorporate frequently travel transit routes, including highways, roads, bike paths, pedestrian paths unless transitory population: are sporadic or often absent. PRIMARY PREVENTION: Measures that reduce or eliminate the likelihood of an accident in a manner that is inherently safe (without dependence upon safety systems), including redesign of production systems, reductions in chemical inventories, or substitution of hazardous materials with non- hazardous or significantly less hazardous materials. Safely Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 3 Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 3 of 18 • • PROCESSED NATURAL GAS: Natural gas that has been treated to remove impurities such as water, carbon dioxide, sulfur, and natural gas liquids (e.g., propane, butane, natural gasoline). Processed natural gas is considered to be ready for retail consumption; it largely comprises methane. PUBLIC SAFETY: Protection of the general public from the acute, immediate effects caused by a sing exposure to an accident, generally resulting in severe biological harm, including fatality. Public safety, as used in this section, does not extend to issues of occupational safety or to chronic effects from prolonged exposure to a public health hazard. PUBLIC UTILITY: A high pressure pipeline (> 125 psig) owned by a public utility, regulated by the California Public Utility Commission, and operated for the purpose of transporting gas to temporary storage or to distribution pipelines for delivery directly to retail consumers. Connections between processing facilities and primary transmission pipelines do not qualify as a public utility for purposes of this chapter unless these connections are operated at pressures greater than 125 psig. Fuel gas pipelines between processing facilities, between production facilities, or between processing and production facilities also do not quality as a public utility for the purposes of this chapter. RAW NATURAL GAS: Natural gas extracted from a reservoir but not yet treated to remove impurities such as water, carbon dioxide, sulfur, and natural gas liquids. SECONDARY PREVENTION: Safety systems and programs such as leak detectors, double -walled vessels, emergency flares, and sprinklers that prevent accidents from occurring during a deviation ii the nonnal operations of a facility . SIGNIFICANT RISK: A compound measure of the probability and number of fatalities or serious injuries (generally referred to as societal risk) that is due to a deviation from normal operating conditions and that exceeds the County's threshold for significance in the Environmental Thresholds and Guidelines Manual. SOCIETAL RISK: Risk to a group of people, expressed in terms of the distributed frequency of events that cause multiple casualties or, when appropriate, the frequency of casualties at a specific location UTILITY: Any person, firm, or corporation engaged as a public utility in transporting natural gas, hydrocarbon gas or any mixture of such gases for domestic, commercial, industrial, or other purposes. Safety Element Supplement; Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 4 Adopted- February 1,2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 4 of 18 CHAPTER I: HAZARDOUS FACILITIES In this chapter, the term "hazardous facilities" refers to those industrial facilities, public utilities, public works, and commercial land uses that perform specified operations or handle specified quantities of acutely hazardous materials. Such facilities potentially pose a significant, involuntary risk to public safety by virtue of the flammable, explosive, or toxic properties of hazardous materials used in their operations. Examples of hazardous facilities in Santa Barbara County include oil and gas development, water treatment (if using large quantities of anhydrous chlorine), and refrigerating facilities which require large quantities of anhydrous ammonia. They are considered t— be single -point sources of risk, being fixed in location at a single site. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, the County's Fire Department maintains an inventory of stationary facilities that handle regulated hazardous substances except oil and gas production facilities. While incidents that involve hazardous materials do not frequently result in public casualties or disruption, society nonetheless recognizes the risks involved with hazardous materials and seeks prudent actions to protect public safety. Local government plays a fundamental role in protection public safety. This role includes its function to apply sound principles of land -use planning when siting and permitting hazardous facilities or development in proximity to existing hazardous facilities. In today's society, several methods are available to reduce the risk of hazardous facilities. Inherent safer design represents the most effective method of neutralizing potentially significant or catastrophic impacts to public safety from hazardous facilities when feasible. For example, substituting less hazardous or non -hazardous materials to perform the same function as the acutely hazardous material would in a facility's processes reflects inherently safe design. Substitution has been proven effective in a few applications. The County's Air Pollution Control District successfully applied this method to technology for reducing NOx emissions from certain industrial facilities, substituting aqueous ammonia or urea for anhydrous ammonia as a catalyst in the NOx- reducing process. Many water districts and community pools have substituted hypochlorite (bleach or aqueous chloramines for chlorine in direct response to state and local fire code regulations. Another method for neutralizing significantly adverse impacts to public safety focuses on siting hazardous facilities in relatively remote locations and subsequently controlling the type of land use that are placed in proximity to the hazardous facility. Proper siting of a hazardous facility and protecting it from future encroachment of development falls to local government where land -use planning occurs, unless preempted by state or federal law .1 Additional methods focus on proven safety systems such as leak detection, double -walled vessels, emergency flares and water deluge that prevent accidents from occurring during a deviation from the normal operations of the facility .Also adjustments in operating -procedures can help reduce the 1 Nonetheless, state and federal agencies are still likely to consider local general plans and zone codes when making such siting decisions. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 5 Adopted- February 1, 2000- Resolution 00-56 Page 5 of 18 • . probability of accidents and reduce human error which is a significant causal factor in many accidents. In 1996, California adopted Senate Bill 1889 to establish the California Accidental Release Prevention Program (Ca1ARP).2 This program implements the federal Risk Management Program3 in concert with California's pre-existing Risk Management and Prevention Program. CaIARP applies to stationary sources (not including offsite pipelines or production of oil and gas) and requires their registration if they use regulated substances that are specified in the implementing regulations.4 It also establishes specific responsibilities for operators and owners of these station— sources with oversight by local administering agencies.5 For stationary sources with the potential t( adversely effect offsite population, such responsibilities include an assessment of hazards, assessment and implementation of methods to prevent accidents (including operating procedures, employee training, maintenance, compliance audits, and incident investigation), and emergency response planning. Ca1ARP focuses on prevention and reduction of hazards through secondary preventative measures such as safety systems, employee training, and emergency response planning. However, it occurs subsequent to and largely separate from land -use decisions that can be critical for reducing significant risk to the public by considering siting and preliminary design issues. The objectives and policies listed below primarily concern land -use decisions such as siting issues (compatibility of proposed developments with surrounding land uses ), compliance with the California Environment Quality Act, initial design of the facility, and compensation in the event of evacuation. It also extends to oil and gas operations that, although not governed by Ca1ARP , are of significant local concern. APPLICABILITY oo'e`.cEves>att"�;� ��Iicies>cvYtaric °` o 1. o 'a scretro a hazardous ..................... SMIA 2 Health and Safety Code, Sections 25531 to 25543.3. erertfSu"''•lenet> ertai• rrs'ro safe f((otixrl.taes..1 as)::and �u 'ort n >irac C n entratt eve -En men: that aZar at t es .rtessAr ea re? Ile?flr more from a ............................. 3 Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 68, which contains 1996 regulations promulgated the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, Section 112(r). 4 Title 19, California Code of Regulations, Division 2, Chapter 4.5. 5 The Fire Department is the Certified Unified Program Agency for the entire County (including incorporated areas but not federal land), making it the responsible agency for enforcing Ca1AJ along with five other programs for hazardous waste management, Business Plans, above -ground a underground storage tanks, and tiered permitting for onsite recycling of hazardous materials. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 6 Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 6 of 18 B. Gas processing facilities, including gas ripping associated with oil processing subject discretionary land -use permits pursuant to Chapter 35 of the Santa Barbara County Code. C. Facilities dedicated to production, processing, storage, or transportation of natural gas liquids subject to discretionary land -use permits pursuant to Chapter 35 of the Santa Barbara County Code, unless such storage is limited to a single container with a maximum capacity of 10,000 gallons or less and does not require refilling more than once weekly. D. Oil storage tanks subject to discretionary land -use permits pursuant to Chapter 35 of the Santa Barbara County Code, except for (1) floating-rooftanks, and (2) tanks that store 5,000 barrels or less and are located more than one-half mile from a populated area as defined in this Supplement. E. Oil refineries. F. Facilities that store chlorine in containers of one -ton or greater capacity or an equivalent amount in bottles or cylinders connected through a common header. G. Facilities that store anhydrous ammonia in containers of one -ton or greater capacity or an equivalent amount in bottles or cylinders connected through a common header. H. Facilities for refueling motor vehicles with compressed natural gas stored onsite. I. Facilities of a type not addressed in A- H above that use specified quantities of regulated substances (pursuant to Title 19 of the California Code of Regulations, Division 2, Chapter 4.5) and meet all of the following criteria: I) The regulated substance(s) a) is stored as a compressed gas or liquefied compressed gas, or b) is expected to vaporize or evaporate quickly upon accidental release or reaction with another substance, or c) is stored as a liquid at a temperature that exceeds its boiling point, or d) is classified as a Class A or B explosive (per Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, 171-179), or e) is classified as a high-level radioactive material. 2) The regulated substance(s) has the potential to cause a significant risk to populated areas as defined in this Supplement and as determined according to the County's environmental thresholds. (For example, the regulated substance(s) exists as a gas or vapor upon accidental release or upon reaction with another substance upon release, and will either release into the open atmosphere or become dangerously explosive in a confined environment. ) 3) The regulated substance(s) is associated with a specific activity that is generally considered to be incompatible with surrounding land uses. Facilities predominately dedicated to retail distribution of consumer products (such as gasoline stations, or hardware, paint, or dry-cleaning stores) are not subject to the policies of this chapter. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 7 Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 7 of 18 • . OBJECTIVES & POLICIES Objective 1 INFORM LAND -USE PLANNING AND PERMITTING DECISIONS ABOUT SIGNIFICANT RISKS TO PUBLIC SAFETY DUE TO INVOLUNTARY EXPOSURE TO ACUTELY HAZARDOUS Materials POLICY HAZARDOUS F ACILITY SAFETY 1-A. RISK ESTIMA TES The County shall employ accurate estimates of risk associated with hazardous facilities to inform discretionary land -use decisions where substantial, preliminary evidence indicates involuntary public exposure to significant risk may result from the land -use decision. IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS: (A) RESPONSIBILITY OF CEQA LEAD OR RESPONSIBLE AGENCY. The County agency designated as the lead or responsible CEQA agency for proposed land -use projects shall implement this policy during the environmental review process. If screening during the initial study of a proposed project reveals that the project inay cause involuntary exposure of the public to a significant risk, then the agency shall conduct a quantitative risk analysis. The CEQA lead or responsible agency shall share responsibility for overseeing the preparation of the risk analysis with the Fire Department. Among other things, this joint responsibility is essential to ensure that the CEQA risk analysis will align wit the subsequent, pre -operational risk analysis required through the California Accidental Release Program (CalARP). In cases where risk analysis has already been performed by a governmental agency, the CEQA-lead agency shall ensure that the analysis is up-to-date and accurately reflects the specific risk associated with the proposed project. (B) MAINTENANCE OF THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE AND GUIDELINES. To assist the environmental review process, the County shall maintain environmental thresholds for the purpose (] determining the significance of risk to public safety .These thresholds should consider both risk of fatality and serious injury to the public, and should specify any exceptions to the application of this policy. Planning and Development should also maintain guidelines to ensure the consistency and accuracy of risk analyses performed in satisfaction of this policy, and identify appropriate screening methods and tools to be used in initial studies. All estimates of risk shall be as accurate as possible, reflecting any reductions in risk due to mitigation while still being sufficiently conservative to minimize underestimating potential risk- ( C) RESPONSIBILITY TO FUND RISK ANAL YSES AND UPDATES. The applicant of a proposed hazardous facility shall be responsible for funding risk estimates and updates triggered by changes in the hazardous facility that may affect its level of risk offsite. Ordinarily, the first update shall occur upon approval of the project in order to reflect the reduction of risk accomplished through approved mitigation of risk. The next update shall occur prior to start-up if evidence suggests that changes 'in design or operations during construction may increase or reduce risk offsite. Subsequent updates shall occur when changes in operations or design of the hazardous facility if evidence suggests that such changes may increase or reduce risk offsite. Additional updates shall be required as deemed necessary following the occurrence of accidents if the circumstances of the accident ( or occurrence of repeated accidents) suggest additional risk. The responsibility of funding risk analyses for projects that are proposed in proximity to existing hazardous facilities shall fall to the applicant of that new development. A risk analysis shall not be required if the hazardous facility has been permanently abandoned, unless hazardous materials continue to be stored or used onsite or contamination of soil or water requires such an analysis. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 8 Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 f Page 8 of 18 Objective 2 DEFINE UNACCEPTABLE RISK IN.INNER THAT GUIDES COA4SISTENT AND SOU AND -USE DECISIONS L'VVOL VING HAZARDOUS FACILITIES POLICY HAZARDOUS F ACUITY SAFETY 2-A. UNACCEPT ABLE R DEJ/ELOPMENT Proposed new development that meets either of the following two criteria shall represent an unacceptably high level of risk and constitute a prima facie standard for denial of the proposed development. (I) All proposed development that registers mitigated risk in the red zone of the County's risk thresholds unless the proposed development is determined to be urban dependent as defined in this supplement, it avoids exposure of highly sensitive land uses to significant risk, and no othel feasible location is available. (2) All new development that registers mitigated risk in the amber zone of the County's risk thresholds if exposure of a highly sensitive land use would occur as result of project approval. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: As stipulated in the County's Risk Thresholds, this policy shall apply to new hazardous facilities and development proposed in proximity to an existing hazardous facility, but does not apply to occupational risk (e.g., employees of new or existing hazardous facilities ). POLICY HAZARDOUS FACILITY AFETY 2-B EPTABLERISK INVOLJ/L11fMODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Proposed modifications to existing development that require a discretionary land -use permit and meet any of the following three criteria shall represent an unacceptably high level of risk and constitute a prima-facie standard for denial. (1) Modifications that increase risk and the resulting mitigated risk registers in the red zone of the County's risk thresholds, unless the proposed modification is required to comply with law, the modification does not increase significant risk to highly sensitive land uses, and no other feasible alternatives are achievable. (2) Modifications that increase risk and the resulting mitigated risk registers in the red zone of the County's risk thresholds, unless the proposed modification is made to an urban dependent land use and highly sensitive land uses are not exposed to significant risk as a result of the modification. (3) Modifications that increase risk and the resulting, mitigated risk registers in the amber zone of the County's risk thresholds if exposure of a highly sensitive land use would occur as result of project approval. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: As stipulated in the County's Risk Thresholds, this policy shall apply to new hazardous facilities and development proposed in proximity to an existing hazardous facility, but does not apply to occupational risk (e.g., employees of new or existing hazardous facilities). Objective 3 p RE VENT DEVELOPMENT THAT EXPOSES THE PUBUC TO UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF RISK AND OTHERWISE REQUIRE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO MINIMIZE PUBLIC EXPOSURE TO SIGNIFICANT RISK TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE Safety Element Supplement. Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 9 Adopted February 1, 2000 ..Resolution 00-56 Page 9 of 18 • I POLICY HAZARDOUS FACILITY SAFETY 3-A. SITING New hazardous facilities shall be sited to prevent unacceptable risk to offsite population as defined in this chapter. New hazardous facilities should also be sited to avoid significant offsite risk to populated areas, as defined in this chapter. Siting considerations undertaken to optimize publicsafety shall also examine routes used for transporting acutely hazardous materials to or from a n( hazardous facility . IMPLEMENTING ACTION: This policy shall be implemented during the environmental review and permitting of a new hazardous facility. Similar siting alternatives shall be considered during the permitting of a substantial expansion to an existing hazardous facility if such expansion is found to present an unacceptable risk as defined in Policy 2-B of this chapter. POLICY HAZARDOUS FACILITY SAFETY 3-D. ENCROACHMEN The County shall not allow a development near existing hazardous facilities if the development would expose populated areas, as defined in this supplement, to unacceptable risk, as defined in Policies 2-A and 2-B of this chapter. POLICY HAZARDOUS F ACILITY SAFETY 3-C. MITIGA TION New hazardous facilities shall employ primary and secondary preventative measures to eliminate ( reduce significant risk to off site population. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: Permit processing and compliance for new hazardous facilities shall examine the effectiveness of inherently safer designs, technology, and procedures to reduce significant levels of offsite risk and require those that show substantial reduction in significant risk where feasible. For example, the County shall require consideration of substituting less hazardous 01 non -hazardous materials where feasible. If significant societal risk to off site population is unavoidable despite feasible primary prevention, then design shall include appropriate secondary control measures to provide a sufficient contingency for minimizing the occurrence or consequences of an accident. Among other mitigation, permits for new hazardous facilities shall require implementation of an approved program for inspection and maintenance. This program may be accomplished through the Ca1ARP program (Title 19, California Code of Regulations, Division 2, Chapter 4.5) and/or other mechanisms such as a Safety Inspection, Maintenance, and Quality Assurance Program (SIMQAP) and programs administered by the County's Petroleum Officer. Additionally, new major oil and gas projects shall require approved'SIMQAPs in concert with CalARP requirements. Existing SIMQAPs shall remain operative. SIMQAPs or similar programs shall meet approval of County permitting agencies before the facility operator commences operations. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 11 Adopted- February 1, 2000- Resolution 00-56 Page 10 of 18 CHAPTER II: GAS PIPELINES Gas pipelines that operate outside the confines of industrial facilities, public works, or consolidated oil and gas planning areas in Santa Barbara County are limited to the transportation of natural gas in either a raw or processed form. Both forms of natural gas qualify as hazardous materials by virtue of their flammable and explosive properties. Moreover, raw natural gas produced in and offshore Santa Barbara County often contains sufficient concentrations of hydrogen sulfide to be acutely toxic as well. Such gas is commonly referred to as sour gas. In 1999, the Southern California Gas Company operated 137 miles of high-pressure transmission pipelines and 146.5 miles of high pressure supply pipelines (i.e., between 126 and 1,000 psig) in Santa Barbara County .These pipelines transport large volumes of natural gas to a network of low- pressured pipelines that distribute natural gas to customers. Approximately 40-45 additional miles of active, onshore natural gas pipelines supported development of onshore and offshore oil and gas reserves in 1999, gathering raw gas from producing areas and sending it to onshore processing facilities.6 A smaller number of relatively short pipelines deliver gas from processing facilities to gas utility's transmission network. New gathering and transmission pipelines would be required if oil and gas reserves offshore the County's northwestern coast are developed. Nationwide, operators of gas transmission pipelines reported 382 releases from 1986 through mid- 1999, resulting in 39 fatalities, 189 injuries and over $238 million dollars of property damage.? External forces continue to represent the largest cause of failures for natural gas transmission pipelines, accounting for 151 reportable incidents from 1994 through 1998. External forces include third -party intrusions into the pipeline corridor, earth movements, and earthquakes, accounting for 49%, 9%, and 3% of all pipeline failures respectively .8 Damage from external forces may produce an immediate release or a mere scratch on a coated - steel pipeline that leads to subsequent accelerated corrosion and failure at a later time.9 6 The number and length of natural gas gathering pipelines varies over time as new fields are brought into production and old fields or processing facilities are decommissioned. In the 1980s. increased offshore production added several miles of onshore gathering pipelines, giving Santa Barbara County nearly twice the national average pipeline mileage per square mile. Later, abandonment of the Battles Gas Plant in the 1990s significantly reduced the number of active onshore gathering and fuel gas pipelines by several miles. 7 Office of Pipeline Safety, U.S. Department of Transportation. Natural Gas Pipeline Operators, Incident Summary by Year. See 114:/ /ops.dot.gov/ng97 -a.htm. These statistics do not include releases from rural gathering pipelines not regulated by the Office of Pipeline Safety . 8 Bercha International Inc. Santa Barbara Policy Paper on Gas Pipeline Safety. (Santa Barbara: Planning & Development Department, Energy Division, 1996. ) Page 2.11. External interference is also a leading cause of pipeline failure in European gas pipelines; see European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group. Gas Pipeline Incidents. (The Netherlands: 1988.) 9 Muhlbauer, W. Kent. Pipeline Risk Management Manual. (Houston: Gulf Publishing Co., 1996.) Page 35. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 11 Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 11 of 18 • i Regulatory oversight of gas pipeline safety bridges all three levels of government. Pursuant to t Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968;10 the U.S. Department of Transportation establishes a enforces minimum safety standards for both intrastate and interstate gas pipelines through its a of Pipeline Safety (OPS).11 These minimum standards focus on several aspects of design, construction, operation, and maintenance, while the states and political subdivisions may enact to prevent damage, restrict routing, define buffers, and address other land -use considerations. Among other things, OPS supports the states and their political subdivisions in restricting development immediately over or adjacent to high pressure and sour gas pipelines to reduce failure by external forces. Within California, the state's Public Utilities Commission (PUC) enforces a may supplement the federal regulations, but only for pipelines operated by public utilities.12 For non-public utilities, OPS implements and enforces applicable federal regulations (Title 49, Cod Federal Regulations, Part 192) for gas pipelines in California that are subject to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act. OPS's regulatory scope does not extend to gathering lines outside the limi l any incorporated or unincorporated city, town, or village, or outside the limits of any designated residential or commercial areas such as a subdivision, business or shopping center, or community development. 13 ..................................................... o°ca( � ernment c�:n e state> vernen • pIIntrumon p .................... .................... reccssa ' =rot 'its autl or uid.:�n.elfare..tf. its . eitrzens.::Tlnrc�u. da rt es adl t to aza dour P 1 real rlt u ful in rc ucrn .......... . font"` <>Jocal ' tzvu nhi ent<can u? o lau £ o aa..4pu0 .,.... ......... � by.: :.part Local government may also map and keep records on pipeline locations and characteristics that define risks to public safety and aid emergency response. It may also require conditions in construction permits to reduce risk of pipeline failure so long as state or federal law does not preempt any such requirements. 10 49 U.S.C. 1671 et.seq. 11 Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations; Section 192.1. 12 General Order No. 112-E. also sets additional minimum requirements that it considers adequate for safety under conditions normally encountered in the gas industry and specified: requirements for abnormal or unusual conditions are not specifically proscribed (Section 11 Compliance with the General Order is not intended to relieve a utility from any state requirements (Section 103.3). Additional requirements are largely focused on reporting related conditions. 13 Gathering lines generally include those pipelines upstream of gas processing or, in the gas processing, upstream of commingling with other gas streams or transfer of custody. 14 Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Pipelines and Public 5 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1988.) Page 40-41, Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 12 of 18 APPLICABILITY The objectives and policies herein pertain to the following types of gas pipelines that are located wholly or partially in the unincorporated area of Santa Barbara County: A. All natural gas gathering pipelines except: ( 1) rural pipelines that serve onshore gas flelds upstream of first compression to D 50 psig; (2) pipelines within the boundaries of gas producing or processing facilities; and (3) pipelines not subject to discretionary land -use permits pursuant to Chapter 35 of the Santa Barbara County Code. B. All natural gas transmission pipelines not operated by a public utility that are subject to discretionary land -use permits pursuant to Chapter 35 of the Santa Barbara County Code. C. All high-pressure, natural-gas pipelines (> 125 psig) operated by a public utility when expressly identified in a specific policy. The low-pressure, distribution pipelines ( 125 psig) operated at low pressure by public utilities to deliver natural gas from transmission pipelines to residences and commercial users are exempt from this chapter . D. All new development or modifications to existing development that require a discretionary permit and, except for equipment directly associated with the operations of the gas pipeline, is proposed in proximity to those gas pipelines identified in A -C above if it results in involuntary public exposure to significant risk. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Objective 1 DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN FUNCTIONALLY RELEV ANT AND ADMINISTRATIVELY MANAGEABLE INFORMATION ON GAS GATHERING AND TRANSMISSION PIPELINES POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 1-A. INVENTORY The County shall maintain a current inventory of gas pipelines, including public utility transmission pipelines, and shall require operators of gas pipelines to provide it with information deemed essential for such inventory . IMPLEMENTING ACTION: Planning & Development shall maintain this inventory of pipelines, and shall condition permits for pipelines to submit other necessary data as often as required to inform land -use decisions. Information essential to risk management and land -use planning can include such characteristics as pipeline locational maps, diameter, and length, pipeline pressures (average operating, maximum operating, and maximum allowable ), description of previous releases, boundaries of pipeline easements, and operating and maintenance practices. Planning & Development shall also evaluate the effectiveness of this inventory in its permitting processes and make necessary revisions, based on the merit of the data contained in the inventory . Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 13 Adopted- February 1, 2000- Resolution 00-56 Page 13 of 18 • . POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY I -B. RISK ESTIAMIAYES To the extent practical, the County shall maintain accurate estimates of societal risk associated with gas pipelines to inform land -use decision- making of potential risk where substantial evidence indicates public exposure to significant risk may result. IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS: (A) RESPONSIBILITY OF CEQA LEAD OR Responsible AGENCY. The County agency designated as the lead or responsible CEQA agency for proposed land -use projects shall implement this policy during the environmental review process. If initial screening reveals that a proposed development may result in a significant off-site risk to the public, then the agency shall conduct a quantitative risk analysis the extent of risk, pursuant to the County's Environmental Thresholds and Guidelines Manual. In cases where risk analysis has already been performed, the agency shall ensure that the analysis is updated and accurately reflects th specific risk associated with the proposed project. Risk analysis conducted for gas pipeline projects shall be updated upon project approval to accurately reflect the risk adjusted by approved mitigation. (B) MAINTENANCE OF THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE AND GUIDELINES. To assist the environmental review process, the County shall maintain environmental thresholds for determining the significance of risk to public safety regarding gas pipelines addressed in this chapter. These thresholds should consider both risk of fatality and serious injury to the public, and should specify any exceptions to the application of this policy. Planning and Development should also maintain guidelines to ensure the consistency and accuracy of risk analyses performed in satisfaction of this policy. All estimates of risk shall be as accurate as possible, reflecting any reductions in risk due to mitigation, while still being sufficiently conservative to minimize underestimating potential risk. (C) RESPONSIBILITY TO FUND RISK ANALYSES AND UPDATES. The applicant of a proposed gas pipeline shall be responsible for funding risk estimates and updates triggered by changes in the hazardous facility that may zrffect it level of risk offsite (V AGUE). Ordinarily, the first update shall occur upon approval of the project in order to reflect the reduction of risk accomplished through approved mitigation of risk. The next update shall occur prior to start-up if evidence suggests that changes during construction in the design or operations of the pipeline may increase reduce risk offsite. Subsequent updates shall occur when changes in operations or design of the hazardous facility may affect an increase or reduction in risk offsite. The responsibility of funding risk analyses for projects that are proposed in proximity to existing gas pipelines shall fall to the applicant of the new development. A risk analysis shall not be required if the gas pipeline is permanently abandoned. Objective 2 DEFINE UNACCEPTABLE RISK INA M4ATNER THAT GUIDES CONSISTENT AND SOUND LAND -USE DECISIONS INVOL VING GAS PIPELINES POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 2-A. UNACCEPTABLE RISK I DEVELOPMENT Proposed new development that meets either of the following two criteria shall constitute an unacceptably high level of risk and constitute a prima facie standard for denial of the proposed development. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 14 Adopted -February I, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 14 of 18 1. All proposed development that registers mitigat isk in the red zone of the County's risk thresholds a css the proposed development is determined to be urban dependent as defined in this supplement, it avoids exposure of highly sensitive land uses to significant risk, and no other, feasible location is available. 2. All new development that registers mitigated risk in the amber zone of the County's risk thresholds if exposure of a highly sensitive land use would occur as result of project approval. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: As stipulated in the County's Risk Thresholds, this policy shall apply to new gas pipelines and development proposed in proximity to an existing gas pipeline, but does not apply to occupational risk. EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Proposed modifications to existing development that require a discretionary land -use permit and meet any of the following three criteria shall represent an unacceptably high level of risk and constitute a prima facie standard for denial. (1) Modifications that increase risk and the resulting mitigated risk registers in the red zone of the County's risk thresholds, unless the proposed modification is required to comply with law, the modification does not increase significant risk to highly sensitive land uses, and no other feasible alternatives are achievable. (2) Modifications that increase risk and the resulting mitigated risk registers in the red zone of the County's risk thresholds, unless the proposed modification is made to an urban dependent Ian( use and highly sensitive land uses are not exposed to significant risk as a result of the modification. (3) Modifications that increase risk and the resulting, mitigated risk registers in the amber zone of the County's risk thresholds if exposure of a highly sensitive land use would occur as result of project approval. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: As stipulated in the County's Risk Thresholds, this policy shall apply to new gas pipelines and development proposed in proximity to an existing gas pipeline, but does not apply to occupational risk. Objective 3 ROUTE GAS PIPELINES A WAY FROM PRESENT AND PROJECTED POPULATED AREAS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE AND PROTECT THESE ROUTES AGAINST ENCROACHMENT POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 3-A. ROUTING New pipelines, or existing pipeline relocations, shall be routed to avoid significant risk to populatedE areas where feasible. New pipelines, or existing pipeline relocations, shall also be routed to prevent significant risk to highly sensitive land uses as defined in this chapter, unless the risk can be rendered insignificant via other measures. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: Permit processing for new pipelines or relocation of existing pipelines shall require optimal pipeline routes, considering public safety and other enviromnental factors, to avoid populated areas where feasible and to prevent exposure of highly sensitive land uses to significant levels of risk. The determination of populated areas shall consider both present and reasonably anticipated future development according to applicable land -use plans, subdivision maps, Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 15 Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 15 of 18 • • zoning, and urban spheres of influence. Significant risk shall be based on the extent of a vapor cloud's Lower flammability limit or dangerous dosages of hydrogen sulfide (identified through air dispersion models and probit equations and based on Emergency Response Planning Guidelines 2 and 3, adjusted to reflect the anticipated size of the vapor cloud). POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 3-D. ENCROACHMENT The County shall control development near gas pipelines by not allowing highly sensitive land if the existing pipeline would expose the new use to significant risk. F or other types of propose development near existing pipelines, the County may require mitigation if they are located with presumptive hazard zone of the pipeline. A person who seeks to develop within a presumptive hazardous zone may rebut the presumed boundaries of this zone through site-specific analysis t complies with County thresholds. IMPLEMENTING Action: Controls shall be exercised on development highly sensitive land uses within the hazardous zone of the pipeline, as determined by the extent of a vapor cloud's lower flammability limit or dangerous dosage levels of hydrogen sulfide (identified through air dispersion models and probit equations based on Emergency Response Planning Guidelines 2 and 3 and adjusted to reflect the anticipated size of the vapor cloud). For other types of development propose( near existing pipelines, mitigation may include optimal siting within parcel(s) in a manner that minimizes the impact, reasonable design measures to effect adequate sheltering in-place, reasonable design measures to control ignition sources, controls to ensure that grading and construction does n reduce the burial depth of an existing pipeline below minimum requirements, and notification to all future owners and renters of the approximate location and potential hazards of gas pipelines. Presumptive hazardous zones may be based on either societal or individual risk, depending upon availability of such measurements. Rebuttal of these zones should be processed prior to issuance of permit. Objective 4 MITIGATE RISK THROUGH TECHNIOUES IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONMAINTENANCE, AND UPGRADE OF PIPELINE THAT ARE COMMENSURATE WITH THE LEVEL AND ANTICIPATED DURATION OF THE RISK POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 4-A. SAFE DESIGN In a manner consistent with applicable law, the County shall condition discretionary land -use approvals of new gas pipelines to require safe design, including technology to prevent failure an reduce the consequences of failure. Examples include proven controls for preventing internal an external corrosion and fractures; proven leak detection; safe venting systems; appropriate capabilities for shutting the pipeline down and isolating the pipeline leak; and effective, public warning systems. IMPLEMENTING Action: Requirements shall be commensurate with the level and anticipated duration of the risk. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous I%'Iaterials Page 1/ Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 16 of 18 POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 4-B.O E OPERATIONS The County shall condition discretionary land -use approvals of new or substantially upgraded gas pipelines to require a Safety Inspection, Maintenance, Quality Assurance Program or similar mechanism to ensure adequate inspection (including smart pigs ), maintenance, and other operating procedures. Any such mechanism shall meet the approval of County permitting agencies prior to commencement of pipeline operations and provide for systematic updates also subject to County approval. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: Requirements shall be commensurate with the level and anticipated duration of the risk. POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 4-C. REDUCED HAZARD ZONES For pipelines associated with new production of natural gas, the County shall require feasible operating methods for reducing the hazard along the pipeline corridor that are commensurate with the level of risk. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: Potential considerations minimally include one or more of the following methods: sweetening of gas offshore; removal of condensate at the production site to achieve a single -phased flow in the gas pipeline; reduction of maximum allowable operating pressure, thicker- walled pipelines, and systematic surveillance of the right-of-way. Measures shall be commensurate with the level of significant risk posed by the pipeline, and may be adjusted as that level of significance changes over time. Objective 5 MINIMIZE PIPELINE FAILURES CAUSED BY EXTERNAL FORCE POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 5-A. CONSULTATION WITH PIPEL The County shall consult with applicable pipeline operators, including public utilities, during the preparation of land -use plans and during the early stages of reviewing discretionary permit applications on all properties that contain, or are adjacent to, gas pipelines, including public utility: high pressure pipelines. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: The Subdivision/Development Review Committee shall consult with pipeline operators shortly after receiving an application for subdivision or development. The Planning & Development Department shall consult during preparation of community plans and other applicable land -use planning. POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 5-8. SETBACKS The County shall require a minimum setback of 15 -to -25 feet from the centerline of gas pipelines including public utility high pressure pipelines, for all buildings and structures to prevent damage the pipeline by external mechanical forces and to permit operators timely and unhindered access j repair, maintenance, survey, and emergency response. Exceptions to this policy shall include: (a) corridor -type locations such as roads and highways, and corridor -type uses such as other pipeline! bicycle and pedestrian paths, utilities, and appurtenances of corridors located in public rights -of - way; (b ) land subdivided before January 1, 2000, where a landowner or pipeline operator can demonstrate to the County that the minimum setback poses an undue hardship, and a setback of lesser distance (agreeable to the pipeline operator, land owner, and the County) can meet the intent Safety Element Supplement, Part A: Hazardous Materials Page 17 Adopted- February 1, 2000- Resolution 00-56 Page 17 of 18 • • of this policy; ( c ) pipeline endpoints and interconnecting pipelines, ( d) replacement of a public utility pipeline ‘vith a functionally equivalent pipeline, and (e) where state or federal law preempts application of this policy. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: The Planning & Development Department shall consider the 25 feet as the basic setback during preparation of community plans and other applicable land -use planning. The Subdivision/Development Review Committee shall ensure that proposed subdivisions or development take the prescribed 25 -foot setback into consideration. If the County finds the 25 -foot setback poses a hardship to proposed development, considering other environmental and zoning constraints, then it shall determine a lesser setback no less than 15 feet ( except as provided in prescribed exceptions of the policy) that accomplishes the intent of this policy while providing some remedy to the hardship posed by the 25 -foot setback. POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 5-C. BURIAL DEPTH Unless infeasible, new subsurface pipelines, or relocation of existing subsurface pipeline, shall be buried at an appropriate depth, taking into consideration affects of erosion, scouring, and other forms of natural or human -caused earth movement. A minimum burial depth shall be maintained for the entire operating life of the pipelines. IMPLEMENTING ACTION: Any calculation of initial burial depths should take into account depth reduction via erosion and other forms of earth movement (including grading and construction) unless other means of maintaining a safe minimum burial depth can be incorporated throughout the operating life of a pipeline. Pipeline depths should be assessed every five years, or at a more frequent interval when geologic characteristics, flooding, and other circumstances indicate a prudent need for special monitoring. This policy does not apply to pipelines decommissioned for a period of one year or longer; however, this limitation shall not supersede other policies or regulations that address requirements for maintaining burial depths of decommissioned pipelines. This policy shall apply to new and existing pipelines where burial depths are specified. It also applies to existing, buried pipelines where depths are not prescribed, but maintenance of a minimum depth is warranted. POLICY GAS PIPELINE SAFETY 5-D. MARKING PIPELINE PRESENC New pipelines, or relocation of existing pipelines, shall include measures to clearly warn outside parties about the presence of a gas pipeline, including proper marking of the right-of-way with signage and use of brightly colored warning tape approximately one foot above buried pipelines where feasible. Safety Element Supplement, Part A: HazardousAMlaterials Page 18 Adopted -February 1, 2000 -Resolution 00-56 Page 18 of 18 CITY COUNCIL DRAFT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis et) Submitted to: Community Development Department CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive City Council and Planning Commission Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 Submitted by: 1580 Metro Drive THE PLANNING CENTER Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714.966.9220 Fax: 714.966.9221 E-mail:costamesa@planningcenter.com MAY 9, 2000 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 1 1 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. 30211 Development not to interfere with coastal access. 30212 Provision of adequate access by new development unless adequate access exists or it would impact natural resources. 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. 30213 Encourage and provide lower cost visitor and recreational facilities. 30214 Implementation of public access policies considered on a case-by-case basis. 30252 New development should maintain and enhance access to the coast by facilitating transit, non -automobile transit and adequate parking. Statement of Philosophy: To preserve and increase where feasible, residential, commercial, and general public parking within the Coastal Zone. Goals and objectives Parking is preserved and increased in the Coastal Zone by requirements contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance, Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code. These measures are detailed below. 1. To provide adequate residential parking . To maintain adequate parking space for both visitors and shoppers . To provide easy access to work-related parking for merchants. . To maximize the safety and accessibility of parking while minimizing noise, traffic congestion and negative visual impacts. . To provide an equitable distribution and allocation of parking resources. These goals are implemented by application of the requirements of Title 17, the Zoning Ordinance, of the City's Municipal Code. Chapter 17.44, Off -Street Parking, provides the parking standards and requirements for the City. Section 17.44.020 provides minimum parking standards for residential uses; Section 17.44.020 provides minimum parking standards for commercial uses; Section 17.44.070 provides the minimum standards for mixed uses; Section 17.44.060 describes minimum standards for shared parking facilities; and Section 17.44.150 provides the minimum standards for underground parking. In addition, Sections 17.44.100, 17.44.110, 17.44.120, 17.44.130 provide the minimum standards for the size of parking spaces, tandem parking, driveways and turning radii, stall and aisle width, respectively. Section 17.44.130 requires that parking be provided and maintained and made available for all new or intensified structures and uses. Goal 3 is implemented by Section 17.040.090 of the Zoning Ordinance which stipulates that required off-street parking spaces be located within 200 feet of the residential uses and within 300 feet of the commercial uses they are intended to serve. Goal 4 is implemented by Section 17.44.160 that requires maintenance and improvement of required parking, including standards for paving, screening, stripping, lighting and landscaping. Wall height in front setbacks are limited to 42" to improve visibility and enhance safety. This includes standards for the design of circulation and access patterns for all uses, except residential. In addition, Section 17.44.090 provides minimum standards for the location of off-street parking including setbacks and provisions for parking facilities such as garages and carports. Goal 6 is implemented by Section 17.44.040 that provides specific requirements for the Downtown area. These Sections are detailed below and in Attachment A, Title 17, Zoning Ordinance. Amend the adopted LUP as follows: (per City Comment) 2. To maintain adequate parking space for both visitors, and shoppers, and beach -goers. Amend the adopted LUP as follows: (per City Comment) 3. To facilitate provide easy access to work-related parking for merchants. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis 6. To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian oriented downtown business area–which are less than a typical commercial area because of its proximity to a regional bike path and to high density residential areas–in order to maximize improvements and expansions to visitor serving business activities without the burden of unnecessary parking regulations and further to encourage alternatives to motorized vehicles in reaching downtown destinations. Page 2 • Amend Goal 6 of the adopted LUP as follows to reflect deletion of section 17.44.040 of the Zoning Code : 6. To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian -oriented downtown business and • visitor -serving area, which are Tess than a typical commercial area because of its proximity to a regional bike path and to high density residential areas, and to continue to explore and encourage new sources of parking, parking strategies, transit options, and altemative means of travel as altematives to providing parking on-site for new development—in-erre metodzed-NenG"faget=tweelulatiens-ancl-fe:74.4ff4e destinations: • Amend the adopted LUP to allow options for the creation of new parking and parking requirements in the Downtown area. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to delete Section 17.44.040 (A & B) and Section 17.44.140 (E) as City has reached the development cap. See discussion in Row 9. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc ornia,Coasta{ Acct 2 a�,mginissh City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 3 • 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. • 30252 New development should maintain and enhance access to the coast by facilitating transit, non -automobile transit and adequate parking. Policy: That the City should not allow the elimination of existing on -street parking or off-street parking spaces within the coastal zone. Future residential and commercial construction should provide the actual parking necessary to meet the demand generated. In the pedestrian oriented downtown commercial district alternatives to providing parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowed, to encourage alternatives to using motorized vehicles and to encourage improvement and enhancement of visitor serving business activities. This policy and program are implemented through Chapter 17.44 and 17.48 of the Zoning Ordinance that provides standards intended to preserve parking, provide for the creation of new parking and provide flexibility in the provision of parking. The following Sections of the Zoning Ordinance implement this provision: • Section 17.44.050 prohibits the reduction of required parking. Section 17.44.140 requires that parking be provided and permanently maintained for every new structure, increase in floor area above 100 square feet during the life of the structure or intensification of use. Section 17.44.200 requires that off-street residential spaces be permanently assigned and/or rented with each unit. • Section 17.44.040 provides alternatives to providing parking in the pedestrian oriented downtown area, including reduced parking requirements and the provision of bicycle facilities/parking. • Section 17.44.190, Vehicle parking districts, allows the payment of in -lieu instead of providing required parking on-site. The fee is based upon the following: buildings less than 4,001 s.f. with a floor area ratio of no more than 1:1 may pay an in -lieu for all required spaces; buildings less than 4,001 s.f. with a floor area ratio of exceeding 1:1 may pay an in -lieu for 25% of required spaces; buildings between 4,001 and 12,001 square feet may pay an in -lieu for 50% of required parking; and buildings greater than 12,001 square feet may not pay an in -lieu fee for required parking. The in - lieu fee is currently $12,500 per space and individual adjustments are not permitted. The fee is established by resolution of the City Council. The DBAEDC is no longer in effect and the City Council administers the Vehicle Parking District in the Downtown area. • Section 17.44.210 allows for reductions in required parking with approval of a parking plan by the Planning Commission. Amend the adopted LUP to allow options for the creation of new parking and parking requirements in the Downtown area. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to delete Section 17.44.040 (A & B) and Section 17.44.140 (E) as City has reached the development cap. See discussion in Row 9. 5/9/00 3 coastmatrix5-9.doc alrforrua Coastal 7 Pok; ommissron¢'RR A`t City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 4 • 30211 Development not to interfere with coastal access. • 30212 Provision of adequate access by new development unless adequate access exists or it would impact natural resources. Program: Current City Building Codes and the Zoning Ordinance support the current policy. Two on-site parking spaces are required for each residence that is constructed, with an additional guest space provided per every three units constructed. Replacement of parking spaces is mandatory for all new developments in which on -street parking spaces are eliminated or the total number of off-street parking spaces are reduced. • Section 17.44.020 (A) 2 off-street spaces per single-family unit plus 1 guest. • Section 17.44.020 (B) 2 off-street spaces per duplex or two-family unit plus 1 guest. 1 additional off-street space for each lost on - street parking spaces because of curb-cuts/driveways. • Section 1744.020 (C) 2 off-street spaces per multi -family unit plus 1 guest per every 2 units. 1 additional off-street space for each lost on -street parking spaces because of curb-cuts/driveways. • Section 17.44.020 (D) 1 off-street space per detached servants quarters or guesthouse. • Section 17.44.030 contains parking requirements for Commercial uses. Generally, these standards are 1 parking space per 250 s.f. of office, 1 per 100 s.f. of restaurant and 1 per 250 s.f. of retail. Alternatives to providing required parking are provided by the following Sections: • Section 17.44.040 contains minimum parking standards for the Downtown area. Generally, these standards are 65% of the required parking as stated in Section 17.44.030. Buildings greater than 10,000 s.f. and a floor area ratio of less than 1:1, no parking is required, and for buildings with a floor area ratio of greater than 1:1, only the excess floor area above the 1:1 ratio is required to provide parking. In addition, bicycle racks are required with any intensification of use or new construction. Section 17.44.140 (E) excuses uses in the Downtown area that intensify from providing additional parking unless floor area increases to a F.A.R greater than 1 to 1. In other areas, intensified uses shall provide additional parking based on the difference between the new use and old use. • Amend the adopted LUP to eliminate detailed parking numbers and eliminate potential conflicts with section 17.44.210 as follows: Program: Program: Current Cit. Building Codes and the Zoning Ordinance support the current policy. constructed: The replacement of parking spaces, or other means deemed appropriate to reduce parking demand, is mandatory for all new developments in which on - street parking spaces are eliminated or the total number of off-street parking spaces are reduced. • Amend the adopted LUP to allow options for the creation of new parking and parking requirements in the Downtown area. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to delete Section 17.44.040 (A & B) and Section 17.44.140 (E) as City has reached the development cap. See discussion in Row 9. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc 3 Co nt 4 alifornia aft:li • 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 5 Policy: That the City should control congestion through the granting of parking permits through an allocation plan that reflects the actual need and supply. • Section 17.44.060 contains provisions for the sharing of parking facilities provided that the peak demands for the uses are staggered. Generally, this provisions allows government facilities and public uses to share up to 100% and other uses to share up to 80% of the required parking. Section 17.44.070 contains provisions for mixed uses and requires that each use provide parking based on the use and location. In addition, Section 17.44.220 allows parking to be determined on a basis of 1 space per 250 square feet for consolidated in retail shopping centers over 10,000 square feet. • Section 17.44190, Vehicle parking districts, allows the payment of in -lieu instead of providing required parking on-site. The fee is based upon square footage and floor area ratio and is currently established at $12,500 per space. See discussion in Row 2. • Section 17.44.210 allows for reductions in required parking with approval of a parking plan by the Planning Commission. • Pier Avenue west of Hermosa Avenue was permanently closed to vehicular traffic for the exclusive use by pedestrians (Coastal permit # 5-97-180 adopted 7/97). Pier Avenue, east of Hermosa Avenue, is currently planned for sidewalk widening in the Downtown Implementation Plan. Delete references to the downtown business area enhancement district commission (DBAEDC) in the Zoning Code as follows: 17.44. 190. A.: Off-street parking within vehicle parking districts. A. Parking requirements within parking districts shall be as provided in this chapter, except that when the city council provides for contributions to an improvement fund in lieu of parking spaces so required, said contributions shall be considered to satisfy the requirements of this chapter. (Please See Row 12 for additional amendment to Section 17.44.190 of the zoning code.) Pa ling permits are available on a daily basis for the summer period and for residents pursuant to the Coastal Commission's approved preferential parking and remote beach parking program (permit 5-84-236 as revised in 1986 and 1989). (The greenbelt, now owned by the City, provides 119 free long-term, remote parking spaces.) • Free parking is provided on the greenbelt as approved by Coastal permit #5-92-177, approved 2/4/93. 5/9/00 5 coastmatrix5-9.doc See Row 4 City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Program: Free parking will be provided to beach visitors on the railroad right-of- way Page 6 • Amend section 17.06.060 D. of the City's Zoning Code to allow for recreational uses, trails, open space and parking in the greenbelt. See discussion in Row 25. • Amend the adopted LUP to as • follows: Program: Public Free parking will continue to be provided to beach visitors on -the railroad -right-of- way way at the following locations: On the Greenbelt, between 8th and 11th Street, east side of Valley Drive Public lots near the Civic Center' West of Valley Drive adjacent to Valley Park 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc 6 orrtraCoastal Act Polis; • 30252 New development should maintain and enhance access to the coast by facilitating transit, non -automobile transit and adequate parking. City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Policy: That a separation of long-term (beach user) and short-term (shoppers) parking be created in the downtown area to provide adequate and flexible number of parking spaces for commercial demand. Page 7 • Currently there are different time limitations for parking dependent on location. Downtown commercial areas near businesses are metered with 2 -hour limit parking while nearby street parking, public parking lots, and remote parking areas allow for longer-term parking. Section 10.36 of the Municipal Code specifies the time frames and locations for parking limitations or parking meters. This includes: 1. Parking meters on Second Street between Monterey Boulevard and Valley Drive; on the ten spaces on the city - owned lot on the north side of 4th Street, east of Pacific Coast Highway; the area bounded by Eleventh Place on the south, to include the VPD lot South of Eleventh Place, Ardmore on the west commencing at the southern boundary of the community center property, Pacific Coast Highway on the east and the southerly side of Sixteenth Street on the north; and on all streets between Palm Drive and Manhattan Avenue 2. A two-hour limit is established for the nine spaces on the unit block and one hundred block of Second Street, regulated by silver posted parking meters. The Police Department issues permits to City residents that allow parking in the yellow posted meters and exempts residents from the one-hour restriction in the residential areas. Residents are allowed to park for up to 72 hours in metered spots. The residential parking permits are valid in the area bounded by the Pacific Ocean on the west; by. Loma or Momingside Drive on the east. Amend the adopted LUP to as follows: Policy: Maintain a supply of parking that balances between That a separation -of long-term (beach user) and short-term (shoppers) parking be created• in the downtown area to provide an adequate and flexible number of parking spaces to satisfy beach user and for commercial demand. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 8 F ,.. .. .. a, ,�, ,, , .. .... .....,..... .r':...�, .. R A ..: :b t ..R. {. :: . ..r...,.t Ci s O l 4 .... ,, fb ra as tel Act P _ .. „ ...... ;.... . ,. .. n. r� d. -e ... -a. , G r.. ..m +a. „_.. ,< _ «.il. ., _ � ! ..>_ d � � _�.� .. M.c..... o `latio Go to mm n � ,� t ... a-.. x, .,v�.. .,.. , °r k. .. _t. «. .. ,. ,... ;.. .. .._. .. . . .. .. Y' r 1 i .. 1• ,,.... ... $e, h v. _ , i. a... , .v W f, . } �'. ... , .... .. '., h... ,. if:. ., . ... y t , _.. .. ,. r ,.. .... ...._, } .. .. .. e r .. a.,r-t. s .. , ^}.. t x >, rw.:� ,...,. .. .f`t ... _. d >i a ,, t,1.. ,. Atlo tedGoasta Lin _Use:.lan P.o is w _ _ .. I d ( ., , a. .. ,. t ..... ti.... w ..s .. :1ay..,vr• • t. tt .. ... "� I Wt. "f' ... ...- '. ..u... t..P ".'4 d, v ..i ':vt. ,. i., si. t :. x.. x•. _ i ,. .. ,.. ,, f. wt _.. .,. r1 t..t.. ,i .......... ... ... ., e � --:. . 4 k, ...., _. ._.. �• ....._.. .,. .... _,... ... kx ..:, ,rr rt.. ... a.. ... v. .<. _.,...... ,. .tr+.,.. r .., nt.' . x_. .a. , .:4+.. x. ,� .. a... .}. ... ...... .3 � r ..4..r. h. . t. at, . �!� .., ,.,... _ .Ex m (ems tatib _, .. _..,._ . > e_t . stip i o n .., . ._ t s�.r.�, r v r.... ........ e � �...,,rol_....a. _a ':.. ...._.. � �.-. ,.: � e +Y2 {., _.. _.. P. v'q3 ..u. ?. e Y ...!€? •,.. .., tt,:f, .. tt^' ..,. 9....... :. .. ,. .. .. li.. -f..,. .._. .... ,., . .n.. _.. _... ,r. ....., r.: .....F i._<.e .. x.. .... .t e n._ .a.<a: ,-... F. -.p n , i .. ,.. , ._.. , t..:. : :ex! . .., . .,. rt ,...o ,.� ,.; .r. .. .. ....,k e ,. m n ati n_.. ,� . R com e d o u,..: ,..., ., t.:�.,.... a>... _ t � .. ,.. . r .... 7 See Row 6 _ Program: The manner in which time is purchased at each of the downtown parking lots determines how the lots will be used. Amend the adopted LUP to as follows to clarify and strengthen parking programs: • Program: Public parking is provided in the North Pier parking structure, public parking lots, and on the street. The rates for parking is-pursliased at each-ef these downtown parking facilities lets used -will continue to be flexibly structured, recognizing seasonal and locational demands, to encourage an efficient balance between beach users, visitor - serving commercial uses, and other commercial demand. • Policy: Balance beach access and residential parking by continuing the seasonal - preferential parking and remote beach parking program within impactedresidential areas near the beach. • Program: Continue to implement the preferential parking and remote beach parking progra during the summer, pursuant t Coastal Development Permit 5- 84-236, as amended, to provide beach access parking at parking meters and in "remote" but beach accessible parking lots, and to limit non-resident parking on designated residential streets. (As identified on the Preferential Parking District Boundary Map). • Program: Provide and maintain signs to direct beach -goers to beach access remote parking lots, and other beach access parking lots within the City. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 9 8 Program: A study is being done by the VPD to develop a downtown parking plan. Program: The City has established the Downtown Enhancement Commission (DEC)[formerly the Vehicle Parking District Commission] to determine the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district which will be recommended to the City Council. The proposed uses are for the acquisition, construction of new parking facilities, and/or the maintenance and operation of existing parking facilities for the benefit of the area; for other improvements and enhancements including, but not limited to: street, landscaping, and pedestrian sidewalk improvements; public events; and the general promotion of business activities in the area. The City's Land Use Plan was adopted in 1994 and incorporated the R/UDAT Plan (Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team from the AIA) recommended goals and policies for the revitalization of the downtown which included a plan for parking. A parking study, conducted by VPD was completed as a part of this process. Amend the adopted Land Use Plan as follows: • Program:. The City has commissioned a study is -being done -by -the -WV to develop a downtown parking plan. • Program: The City has (DEC){f-e,^nor lythe oh�,,,clo iki s Council, acting as members of the Vehicle Parking District Commission, shall determine the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district are for the acquisition, construction of new parking facilities, and/or the maintenance and operation of existing parking facilities for the benefit of the area; for other improvements and enhancements including, but not limited to: street, landscaping, and pedestrian sidewalk improvements; public events; and the general promotion of business activities in the area. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 10 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc 9 li ornra Coastal ActPolic • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. 30211 Development not to interfere with coastal access. 30214 Implementation of public access policies considered on a case-by-case basis. 30252 New development should maintain and enhance access to the coast by facilitating transit, non -automobile transit and adequate parking. 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 11 Policy: The City shall establish parking requirements in the Downtown Enhancement District (DED) identical to the requirements set forth in other areas of the City's coastal zone. However in recognition of the unique parking needs and constraints in the downtown district the City may grant exceptions to the parking requirements for new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of uses within the downtown district if the City can assure that there is parking available within the DED to support beach access and the proposed development. The City may approve exceptions for commercial development up to 96,250 square feet if the findings outlined below are made. After 96,250 square feet of new commercial development has received Coastal Development Permits (CDP), these exceptions cannot be granted unless the Coastal Commission certifies an amendment to the Land Use Plan. • These policies and programs are implemented by parking requirements contained in Title 17, The Zoning Ordinance. Section 17.44.140 requires that new uses, expansions or intensifications provide required parking. Required parking is detailed in Section 17.44.030, off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses, Section 17.44.020, off-street parking requirements for residential uses, and Section 17.44.070, parking requirements for mixed uses. Any reduction in required parking requires approval of a parking plan per section 17.44.210 of the Zoning Code Section 17.44.040 contains minimum parking standards for the Downtown area. Generally, these standards are 65% of the required parking as stated in Section 17.44.030. Buildings greater than 10,000 s.f. and a floor area ratio of less than 1:1, no parking is required, and for buildings with a floor area ratio of greater than 1:1, only the excess floor area above the 1:1 ratio is required to provide parking. In addition, bicycle racks are required with any intensification of use or new construction. Section 17.44.140 (E) excuses uses in the Downtown area that intensify from providing additional parking unless floor area increases to a F.A.R greater than 1 to 1. In other areas, intensified uses shall provide additional parking based on the difference between the new use and old use. Section 17.44.060 contains provisions for the sharing of parking facilities provided that the peak demands for the uses are staggered. Generally, this provisions allows government facilities and public uses to share up to 100% and other uses to share up to 80% of the required parking. In addition, Section 17.44.220 allows parking to be determined on a basis of 1 space per 250 square feet for consolidated in retail shopping centers over 10,000 square feet. The City Community Development Department tracks the annual amount of development. The City has reached the 96,250 square feet limit of commercial development, including new buildings, expansions and/or intensification of uses, in the DED. In effect, Section 17.44.040 allowing deviations in parking standards in the Downtown area is no longer valid. Businesses The City has reached the 96,250 sq ft cap on commercial development in the DED, therefore the Land Use Policy and Program, Section 17.44.140 (E), 17.44.040 (A and B) of the Zoning Ordinance cannot be implemented. The following recommendations are suggested: • Amend the adopted LUP to delete this policy and remove the 96,250 sq. ft. development cap. This would apply city-wide standards to the DED which essentially allow no new square footage unless parking is provided on site, a parking plan is approved, or current in -lieu fees are provided. Policy: The City shall establish parking requirements in the Downtown Enhancement District (DED) identical to the requirements set forth in other areas of the City's coastal zone. However in recognition of the unique parking needs and constraints in the downtown district, the City may explore the creation of and grant exceptions to the parking requirements such as, but not limited to, in -lieu fee programs, parking programs, the creation of remote parking lots with shuttle connections, reduced parking requirements, or shared parking programs. for -new -buildings, 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 12 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc ahforhia Coastal Act P olicy/ City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 13 9 Co nt • Amend Section 17.44.040 of the Zoning Code as follows: C. Merge this section into Section 17.44.210 as follows: 17.44. 210 Parking plans. C. Bicycle racks/facilities shall be provided and/or maintained in conjunction with any intensification of use, or new construction, in an amount and location to the satisfaction of the planning director. C D. A covenant with the city a party thereto, may be ... I: E. Fees, application and processing... • Amend Section 17.44.140 (E) of the Zoning Code as follows: E. When the use of an existing building or structure is changed to a more intense use with a higher parking demand , the requirement for additional parking, shall be calculated as the difference between the required parking as stated in this chapter for that particular use as compared to the requirement for the existing or previous use which shall be met prior to occupying the building unless otherwise specified in this chapter. 5/9/00 1 0 coastmatrix5-9.doc Irfomia Coastal Act Polic City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 14 See Row 9 Program: New development, including expansions and intensification of use shall provide parking consistent with requirements elsewhere in the City unless the following finding are made. If the following findings are made, the exceptions described in Section 2, may be granted. 1. Findings: Before granting the exceptions below the Community Development Director shall certify the following: (a) Fewer than 96,250 square feet of commercial development, including new buildings, expansions and/or intensification of uses, in the DED has received a CDP since November 1, 1994. (b) There is currently adequate parking to support the development and provide adequate beach parking (c) The City Council has approved an interim parking study for the DED that shows the occupancy of the parking spaces in the DED is 90% or less during daylight hours on summer weekends No more than 24,063 square feet of commercial development in the DED has received CDP's since the last interim parking study was approved by the City Council. • See Row 9 The City has reached the 96,250 sq ft cap on commercial development in the DED, as discussed in Row 9. Amend the adopted LUP, as follows, to delete this program and remove the 96,250 sq. ft. development cap. t ofollew+ng: the DED has r ,o,d ., CDo N ti er 1, 1994 • Amend the LUP to delete references to the 24,063 square feet of commercial development in the DED that has received CDP's since the last interim parking study was approved by the City Council. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 15 1 1 See Row 9 2. Exceptions i. When parking is required for projects on lots exceeding 10,000 square feet and/or 1: 1 FA.R., parking in excess of that existing on the site at the time of the proposal shall be provided at 65% of the Current parking requirement ii. Because of the physical constraints to providing parking and the desire to promote a pedestrian orientation in the DED, for projects on lots Tess than 1:1 F.A.R., no parking other than the parking existing on the site at the time of the proposal shall be required. • Section 17.44.190, Vehicle Parking Districts, allows the payment of in -lieu fee of $12,500 per space as determined by resolution of the City Council instead of providing required parking on-site. The in -lieu fees based upon the following: buildings less than 4,001 s.f. with a floor area ratio of no more than 1:1 may pay an in -lieu for all required spaces; buildings less than 4,001 s.f. with a floor area ratio of exceeding 1:1 may pay an in -lieu for 25% of required spaces; buildings between 4,001 and 12,001 square feet may pay an in - lieu for 50% of required parking; and buildings greater than 12,001 square feet may not pay an in -lieu fee for required parking. • Section 17.44.210 allows for reductions in required parking with approval of a parking plan by the Planning Commission. This Section provides the Planning Commission the discretion to consider factors such as bicycle and foot traffic and the uniqueness of a proposed use in considering the reduction of parking requirements for a project. The applicant is required to prove that there is adequate parking to serve the needs of users and employees or propose an appropriate in -lieu fee for parking districts. • Section 17.48.030, Transportation demand and trip reduction measures, creates a tiered nonresidential development requirement dependant on the amount of new square footage for providing information on altemative transportation modes, convenient and acr.fssible carpoollvanpool spaces, bicycle racks, drop-off zones, direct and safe routes to each building, and bus stop improvements. • Amend the adopted LUP to delete this program as follows. 2. Excoptionc Policy: Minimize parking impacts by encouraging a mix of visitor -serving and other commercial uses that balances peak and non -peak parking demand that occurs during the day and seasonally. Program: For new retail and office development or expansions of existing retail and office development within the DED, required parking in excess of that existing on the site shall be provided at 65% of the current parking requirement. be -required:. Program: The City will continue to utilize the recommendations of the City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Pian, October 1994, as a guideline for assessing parking supply, need and design options within the Downtown Area. • Amend the adopted LUP to allow options for the creation of new parking and parking requirements in the Downtown area. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to delete Section 17.44.040 (A & B) and Section 17.44.140 (E) as City has reached the development cap. See discussion in Row 9. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 16 w R x r '.R'. r i - .. .tY r �.. a ,. ._. .. ... � , ...._... I f Coastal:* . P h / ....r. _ .t.F _. Ca r ornia_ oasta Act:. o c _ .Y . ..t. ....... <-,,,,,,,,..r,,, -. ._, w.-rs .: .auk.. .. _«t x. .. .....,.t-: �.. , 1 .. trt , T .. .... ,�'... e•. .. 'Sk f ._...e .... a % 4 Y:M"Y ... ...a .:..v._ a,.__x... ..._ -.x ..xFi :,x.. . ,Ado , . r . x /{ Coastal Co mrssron. Re ulatron ...» _ _n . ... .. �. .j'J.. ..:«. ... ..ac .. _. c , �-,..w .: 3 ,n.a .. _, ,._. _ w• .a.: .*x .,. ..... . >i ..,,� .. :.: ._. ..._Mem: - ., t.. ... » ._.... r ,.. .w... ....... ,. ,erz. a .. .. ,. .,., r"+. _ .. ::,. :R!' "'%�... ... .. .4"np. t �. ,t.. , is , :. .': ,Y ... .. .. e t., 1.. tx u t_ . F .. t. .t ..- _ ..... ..' .: , ., -. ,. .e :. ._,. .�.:. � ... .. t:. t... � rt ., w. , i.. ... L.. n..,. ,... e .. I.. .:.. t .::.A.., t,.... t s .. :. S v�. a... .. � .., ..r.Y ,. i. _..-$ X.. r t..:� ... t ..e. .:. . h.: r.... ,..., - ,..y .,.. ... ._..� r..:. tf.+ .- , A.. ... .. .: - ,..:n ted_Goastal land Use P, lan.P.ohc .._. 1 P Y,. t.: , -.. Y :,.✓ ..». .141 a.✓. a .. ,,.. �+.r?. _.. ,.,. .f� .. r. , :. ....... ...txr ....a � .a, .., .,. s i .,... . ... ,t.:-. xta . Mf .;.+ tt_'^xze' .... .. rv. Y ..., ..: _ t „ . _. r r } rt _ . t .. xk: ^>, _.:. ..., t N .x t -_: r. _ .., r. .. ;. .. , ... e. 1 i a ..:.. >Z .:...... � r v... .e -, 4 r. »... ..x. .. sa..,4 ::: it PM .,.. Y S t ,,t _... f,:3 F L .... .... ..... ... :... ry.: `{`. : l .t::4... ... 4... ... «.... r.... .. ,. .» .r , .:, ... t.:..o....:a.. m ,,. ... .,:,. : � e . � t . - , .. �. - , � t , Exrstrn � le entatio n ., a... ri,. .. S .. � H. 4.: ..o-., :. « :.. � � 'Ed <,. . ,-. V. f.. ..,. A -. 4r:,. ..a..�.,>•a : , .- a. ... ^+., ., x _.., s x... ,t ,., t,. • .: _t ". C. ..x-- 4: ..,..� , rv'. ...5. .....xw..... F s , eco Et mmendatro _ _ a r3. .... .. .... .t , f._ Z... .� . h . t, :,`Es_.. :. y.. E. I x xl.i ,.s•�:: f a, 12 See Row 9 Program: In order to mitigate the impacts of increased parking demand that is created by new development, but is not compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces, the DEC, or its successor agency or the private party, shall provide an in -lieu fund transfer or an in -lieu fee to an improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking, in an amount determined to be sufficient to off -set the increase in required parking spaces caused by the expansion, intensification, or new construction not provided on site. If the DEC determines that the private party is responsible for the in -lieu fee, the privatepartyshall paysaid fee as requested p qmay by DEC - Section 17.44.190, Vehicle Parking Districts, allows the payment of in -lieu fee of $12,500 per space as determined by resolution of the City Council instead of providing required parking on-site. The in -lieu fees based upon the following: buildings less than 4,001 s.f. with a floor area ratio of no more than 1:1 may pay an in -lieu for all required spaces; buildings less than 4,001 s.f. with a floor area ratio of exceeding 1:1 may pay an in -lieu for 25% of required spaces; buildings between 4,001 and 12,001 square feet may pay an in -lieu for 50% of required parking; and buildings greater than 12,001 square feet not pay an in -lieu fee for required parking. ' • Maintain the in -lieu fee program. • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: Program: In order to mitigate the impacts of increased parking demand that is created by new development, but is not compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces, the • .• - - : - - : - _ _ - _ : _ -• Citv Council shall provide an in -lieu fund transfer or an in - lieu fee to an improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking, in an amount determined to be sufficient to off -set the increase in required parking spaces caused by the expansion, intensification;_ or new construction not provided on site. If the DEG Citv Council determines that the private party is responsible for the in -lieu fee, the private party shall pay said fee • In addition to the amendments suggested in Row 3, amend Section 17.44.190 (C) of the Zoning Code as follows to eliminate the restrictions to iotsize requirements for payment of in -lieu fees. Thiswill allow greater flexibility in the ability to consolidate lots and provide parking in the downtown area. 17.44. 190 C. The contribution of fees in -lieu of parking in the downtown area parking may be allowed permitted with a parking plan as approved by the , planning commission and as prescribed in Section 17.44.210. situ: _ 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 17 5/9/00 13 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 18 See Row 9 Program: The City shall not accept a fee in lieu of providing on site parking unless the Community Development Director assures that sufficient parking exists to accommodate the parking demand of new development. The improvement fund to mitigate increased parking demand shall be geared to a threshold limit of increased parking demand. The threshold limit shall be established at 100 parking spaces. • See above, Row 12 • Provide additional information on the threshold limit. • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: Program: The City shall not accept a fee in lieu of providing on site parking unless the Community Development Director assures th sufficient parking exists to accommodate th ill parking demand of new development. The improvement fund to mitigate increased parking demand shall be geared to a threshold limit of increased parking demand. The threshold limit shall be established at 100 parking spaces and the City shall construct new parking upon reaching that threshold limit or the City shall not approve new development accept any fees in -lieu of parking beyond that threshold limit. • See above, Row 12 14 See Row 9 Program: All new commercial development on any lot within the Downtown Enhancement District shall require participation by the business owner(s) in the parking validation program. Existing development of less that 500 square feet may expand or increase in intensity of use up to 15% without participation in the validation program. The validation program shall provide validation for no less than two hours unless all required parking is provided on site without any parking exceptions specified in Section 2 above or any other parking variances or exceptions. • The validation program is implemented by the Community Development Department and Finance Department. The applicant must provide proof of purchase of 200 hours of validations and an affidavit prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: • exseptionc 15 • 30211 Development not to interfere with coastal access. Policy: That the city has the responsibility to insure the safety of its citizens by removing vehicles which are parked in illegal parking spaces and may pose a • The policy and program are being implemented through parking enforcement managed by the Police • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 19 Re Wit.. . 1. .n t ., SS .. t.. �. • .� o a Coa tal . ct .ohc >_ _� ..Calrf mi s A P ! ........ : a .._. ',:: F Y E.,, h... ♦.... .< ::...._ ... ,.� �.... rz. .. xa ,. .M1.. .. ex” •....<va4 tl. »n .>lx � :. . _. .. . :. � ._ s ...._ . � .. Goastat.Gomm>!ssron:R ulatron .. .m,.. ..... .. .... ... ,�`r ... -,. pinnys,110 -D ..., x �`4. "..... .. .e -_aa >».:... ._. - ....�' 6 .. .Y .,....._ .... <t' .. .... :.. rr€,. L , h .., .. ,ke!k5G ,.i...b :v."4xS'x<,mLM. .S ia-- d < ..?f . v, .W :.. n _ , a.N. f a _: � .�< z E .w�_ � 4 „tom,, �. kx.. _..,..,. ... 1 .-. 3t <�. .. .. 1 R."+:.... R 7 i . <.-4 r � d<C u- itG »r. <:., t , e stat_ .Use ,. � 1 k>� a,..H M as.... _ x.:Y 4. _ x. ..._.< �. �. .. ,� . __ � . ,, < 4 � �, � ...u,... � _<... _ .n.,..r... .,. .., .. art 1' .. 4 . ... ..... ..... �.., .c4 .. 'Lrt :ax i .3ret ... ,.. n.. .._. �f" � d h: », t ,: >..... : �zx � . "t+e� -. '.. _ -t Y Y. ♦.:. x , `E .,. � ... .,i..., ::.. .x _ :. ,.. ^, 1.,. ,... ^P'-.. ,., f .,... .. v. . , a R i.. .. .... axr�N C£.,.o.. _s..E<ttF�,tm,._.,.. t.✓ti,a,.. _:. a .. . t _a a.. ._.. .. ,..... E,.�Txx}.ii...'aYnd—...-.a.MR&Yr.4t. Fea.e[.:s. ee >r>e;�.'...G�; a....i..+4x >Nx.�t. ,+aUrzk:Liez. Xx� ,�„z.R.k,. :��§�3::.:ta'Ya4z., » . k�. �. ,.., . »,... .�.,„�, .c ..s _.. _ µ d Eau tt (e a tafiro _�t � _ � ., �.. _... _� p ,.. &^..._- .: <_r: :.. P ,E.. a +. _ .. ne �'!. ,...V v.. , .♦ .. ,, # .. ff .. # :a ..., . '�.. ... 'fe,+. «.. n.... �...._: ,. h. zatF ..� .. ,«. x.. -s.. ,. v T ... ,...... b .. ,x�ad._. i•3.. ... k :.'w eY' F. tE ,. .. t ...:.. > . a.,. -:e ... :v<.. j,, `: _ ,3,a! _, �. ,.Y.;: , zvd>a„'Yetea,t`x �.-ti#`G.`�'sS',15�Sc.:xaf3'P=w yhxve..;4e9ELAszxd�':!{Y.kt�"�<`.. _Ya3^V�.,.M�Yai� 7..zwkw.ttlf3fha ��s .�' :.,. -i •<, .+ � ....._ _,_. , ReCo a __.� ..... .., m dataon .... ,. ... .x. G. -.>: u-. C'. -. 4•..... , .k: : ....... > . , : .., Y :flRa.. ... .._. fwE + t. �{ . C ,.... ",e'. a ..,a .«Ew•'•w3_ofev�.r:<r:,�iX k .i;tY:."..�t'ne'., .e`�;xd ir,el:I R #� � E:ie� � 1.{•3:; �" r... �� ... ...- .. l..a ........ ! • 30252 New development should maintain and enhance access to the coast by facilitating transit, non -automobile transit and adequate parking. threat to the safety of its citizens and/or guests. Department of the City. The specific regulations are• contained in the City's Municipal Code, Chapter 19. .dt, .±.«rP°ar,..^% „w&e-a£eNsi' oa,mffieet 16 111 See Row 15 e Program: Within the Motor Vehicles and Traffic Codes of the City and the State, specific regulations have been outlined for curbing violations regarding illegal parking of vehicles. • Section 17.22.050 (A) and (B) of the Zoning Ordinance prohibit the storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles in required parking spaces or visible from the public right of way and requires that guest spaces be utilized for said purpose and not be occupied for more than 72 hours. Section 17.42.080 prohibits the storage of trailers in the front or side setbacks or for the purpose of living or sleeping. • Section 17.44.160 (F) of the Zoning Ordinance requires that code required parking be maintained free and clear for the parking of authorized vehicles. Trailers, boats, recreational vehicles, motor homes, campers, tractor trucks and inoperable vehicles are not authorized vehicles. • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: • - - 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 20 *,§S, a"<dl dft. o.-1,F...G.�.. rao a_as t ... G.. p,P Y,.x....:.,x ..s F�_ ... lr...,e:_.a. :...<_.".". k.. «..._�.,.,tt... . m,missn , ;.. r i ,. . ... o-.. ........ .. _... :. w v. w ., ,. i.. .,.. _ ....x. ...,.;:.:.. :. ,« ,, .._. r __s..a..f._..'...._..A.,. .cr.o^a fit<.'e,,. dt nC i r.. : ..},... . :.... .x, ..�. .. aas ,. t..1 .... .._.. ... a... "ted. t »...'.., x n.. Y _.. u,: .,.n. . ;r..•. . .i i ,a . >. ....... .� _ as i:s,, C _ n,- . .,,,.».. .:- , ! ....rv. > Min m erten , . :. _ .. T __. » .._... .... .. .. » ..... ,.. : .. ..... ,. .. x.. t .. ... ..^. t,r. .. .. , � s. ......... _r. x.. £. ...._ s. t<1 e,J..�c,.. t,.,.n. datio 1 .r «..... .�. .,<..,.. � r~ ': :.. ,.• _....:. : ,:., x is .-,.. .., ..i , .,. .. r 4'.. .:.. _..:. k •. ,...... E 11 v , .. -.., . .i.. 17 • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. • 30252 New development should maintain and enhance access to the coast by facilitating transit, non -automobile transit and adequate parking. Policy: City should consider land donations or the equivalent for parking as part of a condominium conversion. Sections 17.22.170, of the Zoning Ordinance, require a conditional use permit for conversion of existing apartment buildings to condominiums Section 17.22.290 requires conformance with current development standards, including parking requirements. • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: Of-the-equivalent-for-packing-as-pact-ef -a I 18 • 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. Policy: City should consider establishing a fee in -lieu of providing additional parking on-site for curb cuts. • Projects are required to provide parking on-site per Title 17, The Zoning Ordinance, of the City's Municipal Code. Section 17.44.140 requires that new uses, expansions or intensifications provide required parking. Required parking is detailed in Section 17.44.030, off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses, Section 17.44.020, off-street parking requirements for residential uses, and Section 17.44.070, parking requirements for mixed uses. • In -lieu fees are allowed in parking districts, as specified in Sections 17.44.190 and 17.44.210. Amend the adopted Land Use Plan to delete this policy. Required parking must be provided on-site per Section 17.44.140 of the City's Zoning Code or in an approved parking lot On -street parking does not count toward the required parking. for -sures cute. 19 • 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. Policy: That the Cityshould investigate the possibilityof g lease or purchase of parking lots dispersed throughout the City so as to minimize the impact on the parking demand to the City and its residents. • The Development Agreement for the development of Plaza Hermosa (a p 9 p 93,000 square foot shopping center at the comer of Pier Avenue and PCH) established the parking as a "public parking facility." The lower level of the parking structure provides for 169 parking spaces with a maximum of 6 -hour parking. The City continues to investigate the possibility of leasing or purchasing parking spaces. • The construction of a parking structure is currently underway that would include 300 public parking spaces in the Downtown area (CDP 5-97-011A1). Amend the adoptedLand Use Plan as follows: Policy: That the City should maximize the efficiency of and consider investigate - the possibility of lease or purchase of parking lots dispersed throughout the City and downtown enhancement district so as to minimize the impact on the parking demand to the City and its i residents. 20 • 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. Policy: City should examine the current status of public lands leased and the rents received. Rents are examined annually with the annual budget. • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: 21 • 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safe pp p safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. Policy: That the Cityshould consider convertingthe CityThe streets with two-way traffic with parking on one side into one-way streets with parking on two sides. Cityattempted usingone-waystreets, but thepublic did not accept the p concept. This was evidenced by the subsequent Council election where voters chose candidates opposed to one-way streets. Proposed one-way streets were removed from consideration after the election.- The City considered and rejected this idea. Delete this policy from the Certified Land Use Plan. - - 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis . Page 21 • 30210 Provision of access and recreational opportunities consistent with public safety, property rights and protection of natural resources. • 30212.5 Provision of public facilities, including parking, shall be equally distributed in the Coastal Zone. Policy: That the City should consider the reorientation of the City's current transportation service so as to provide transit service for visitors and residents according to their needs. The City currently provides/participates in the following: 1. Wave, a Dial -A -Ride transit service that offers service to all residents and discounts to seniors and handicapped individuals. This program is funded through Proposition A and C 2. LAX, the Los Angeles express, a commuter service to and from Los Angeles. This program is partly funded by the City of Hermosa Beach. 3. Discount MTA bus fare program for students, handicapped, and seniors. 4 Bus service for the two annual "fiestas" on Memorial and Labor Day weekends provides free service from remote parking to pier area. 5. Bus service is provided for city sponsored programs for school aged children. 23 The City's certified Land Use Plan contains housing provisions. Housing Element, Housing programs and Zoning Ordinance. Delete entire section from the certified LUP. Since the certification of the City's Land Use Plan, the California Coastal Act was amended to remove this requirement. State law changed because protection of low and moderate income housing is addressed in the City's Housing Element of the General Plan that is applicable to the entire City, including the Coastal Zone. Also, the City and private developers are subject to the provisions of Section 65590 of the State Planning and Zoning Law that requires replacement of low-income housing lost to new development or conversions. The City's Land Use Plan should reflect the current requirements of State law. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 22 24 • 30210 Provide maximum access and recreational opportunities while maintaining public safety, protecting public rights, private property and overuse • 30211 Development shall not interfere with coastal access • 30212.5 Public facilities shall be distributed throughout an area to mitigate impacts of overcrowding or overuse • 30252 Location and amount of new development should maintain and enhance public access to the coast Statement of Philosophy: Hermosa Beach shall maintain its current high level of recreational access to the coast and its recreational facilities and be consistent with maintaining the beach in its most natural state. a The City continues to allow full access to the beach at every vehicular and walk -street, maintains the Strand walking and bicycle path, and maintains the beach in its most natural state as no changes to the sands or the shoreline have been proposed. The beach is identified as Open Space in the City's General Plan but not zoned on the City's zoning map. The City owns the beach between the strand and mean low tide line and contracts with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors for maintenance. Future development is directed by policies in the General Plan and Beach Development Plan which limit development to necessary lifeguard, restroom, volleyball and play facilities. Amend the City's Zoning Map to designate the Beach and Strand as Open Space for consistency with the General Plan Open Space designation and to implement the General Plan policies. See Row 27 4 25 See Row 24 Goals and Objectives 1. Maximum access and recreational opportunities shall be provided for all the people consistent with public safety needs and the need to protect public rights, rights of private property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse. • Access is available via unobstructed public right-of-ways at intervals of about two hundred feet that are maintained for the purpose of access to the beach. Further the City's pier allows for pedestrian access and allows for recreational fishing. • The following provide permanent access to the beach: — Strand along entire beach frontage of the City — 8 streets (2nd, 8th, 10th, 11th, 13th, 14th, 15th, and 22"d Streets) — 22 walk streets — 19 alleys • Section 17.06.060 D. of the City's Zoning Code requires that dedicated streets and alleys be used for purposes lawfully allowed. Railroad right-of-ways are reserved for tracks, signals, operative devises and rolling stock. • Section 12.16 of the City's Municipal Code regulates encroachments into the public right-of-way. This section prohibits buildings and structural elements from encroaching into the right-of- way. • Amend section 17.06.060 D. of the City's Zoning Code as follows: D. Areas of dedicated streets or alley and railroad rights-of-way other than such as are designated on the zoning map as being classified in one of the zones provided in this title, shall be deemed to be unclassified and, in the 1 case of streets, permitted to be used only for purposes lawfully allowed and, _In the case of railroad rights-of-way, permitted to be used solely for the purpose of accommodating tracks, recreational uses, trails, open space, parking, signals, other operative devices and movement of rolling stock. • See discussion on ROW 33 regarding encroachments. 26 • 30213 Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided 2. Low cost visitor recreational facilities will be maintained and encouraged where feasible. • Recreational facilities are available including the walking and fishing pier, bike path, volleyball courts, public bathrooms and outdoor 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 23 • showers, and some children's play equipment. These City owns, maintains, and operates these facilities. Cleaning and repairs are made daily and as needed. • The Beach Development Plan encourages additional and different recreational activities on the beach. • The General Plan Open Space Element encourages recreation and visitor serving uses on the beach, strand and recreational facilities in the coastal zone. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 24 .. r. ,.+.. .....,..x.l _af...2..> tas..Go .Sl+..AG .r.llc.«, <.�_ ._.�. k.. �«_ ., . .....� .,, _.. . _ Y _ _ _. n a ., . r... ,....,:,« AA.f! /� �asr n.. a ulairon :~,r- ..�.. .. � CVas. I..�I IR o .,. #a Omm. R ., . ..,.. .,. � . ,.. .,_,. .,. , ... r ... .r... :. .Pu.t. ....... r. z... A ed G. a tah.Land Use Pi n Poiic 4 � .. � . ��... p.. _ _< a.. _t, _ :,.. ._. f...,. x. �€_... .a. ,4.6,.: ,_..< a _� a. .1 e.._. _. e.... f ...> .� x r:��,. � .� ....... a,. ....».m <..f k 5 ,. , n - _ . a .. � _ ....Exist, tm IetfireniaUa n .. .J t-u.�..�. ,.. _ �` .t . ..n t-. $ ,.»*r�r,..= $..:, 1 ...... _ .... ♦ ., .r. .«_. .. ... E r.r.,� ,S,. .... ...1.... . .f�. ..,, _3 r.M,, ..,.. ... ..,. '...Y.. '.Y.E ....... .'a.yy L , e..i _ .. a. _, Recomme dat n tun ... M.. ..., :..... .. } .. ., 27 ~28 • 30210 Provide maximum access and recreational opportunities while maintaining public safety, protecting public rights, private property and overuse • 30220 Coastal areas suited for water -oriented recreational activities that can't be provided at elsewhere shall be protected • 30221 Oceanfront land suitable for recreational use shall be protected for recreational use • 30222 Private lands suitable for visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities shall have priority over private uses except agriculture and coastal- dependent industry • 30223 Upland areas necessary to support coastal recreational uses shall be reserved 3. The City shall protect its coastal resources for recreational activities. • The beach, strand, and ocean is identified as Open Space in the General Plan and no development is permitted beyond the Strand/bike path except the Pier. The General Plan also identifies school grounds, parks, the greenbelt, streets, and private open space as a valuable natural resource. • The Beach Development Plan allows emergency structures in a limited amount. e Amend the City's Zoning Map to designate the Beach and Strand as Open Space for consistency with the General Plan Open Space designation and to implement the General Plan policies. The Open Space Zoning Designation (O -S, ' Chapter 17.30) allows public and private parks, education buildings, playgrounds, recreational centers, public buildings, malls, plazas, and utilities, trails and pedestrian ways, and monuments. This would provide additional protection to coastal resources. • • 30210 Provide maximum access and recreational opportunities while maintaining public safety, protecting public rights, private property and overuse • 30211 Development shall not interfere with coastal access • 30252 Location and amount of new development should maintain and enhance public access to the coast • 30254 New or expanded public works facilities shall be limited to accommodate needs Policy: That the City should restrict buildings and structures on the beach with regards to size and number consistent with current access, safety, and beach usage police -Lifeguard structures should be held to a minimum both in size and number consistent with good safety practices. • The Beach Development Plan provides that no new structures, p except lifeguard headquarters and public restrooms, where absolutely necessary should be allowed on the beach. • The Beach Development Planspecifies the permitted uses on the beach. Uses are limited to recreational, special events, and safety uses. _ 29 See Row 28Program: The City presently has within its Beach Development Plan (adopted Jan. 4, 1972) a restriction on the type and number of facilities that can be placed on the beach west of the Strand See Row 28 ' 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 25 � R o . . ....-. +. E .: ;^ l� ,.. . ,. . .v r ..,rc... t,.. « t ...r. , . _ .. at fo r ,moo , � a taAct Or „ ..e. .._. «eF e. ._.._ ._.. . 5...<,«. .E.R... ... _ -sr... .. t.. .... `t. . w, r .., . E _ oasat-�Co . }� .... �,-- m rss`fon a .. t , E , to , ut on JR � .t E .. u . �, - is' un hhtt amt. _ .. � t_....: ..,i. t'a. >,«. .. s ..... s„ .. ...... ...... m ..., ,i.. . ..rf 2.. e... ,... E.. t- .. _. +i. w.. .-xi�..._, a.4x. ...«.n ... t .. ...t.-_._...... e . ,. ... .. ... 4. . ....... ...... r +fw ... _.. .. • .... :.. $ .. .. «...:. .. tedC .._ __< ...... .... _._ aasfat.Wnd_ e . �., _ _ .._. Us PIa P t€ ,.. ,..,., ,... - .::... . _r.. -. .. �x > t <<. _. cY .:. _. r.o � >., x « ._ > . , __ � . �. x, . � > _ � .... _ � J R"... t, .. .. x ,.'! .>.. ... t ,....._< ..: ... _.. .. � rt£�.:,� n.r ,..-'{e « ._� ~<.m.._. _._ ._, ......a ,. ., t. t. o-ra ....... .w:. ... t..-� 1.,........3 .�.. "t_ x<x+.c"'•.o-...c.,.rnx, _.:.3.J,„$.h+,x....um,.. 4.,....x�F.au:4- 3.;#3 �.xt.:.x: v+c� m>::.>..;xaaa zn ,ilx.__•,<xru �..r-�i"�34 YF?e•L.. ..'.. .... .. -:... t ..,,. r .. ',...._.. :.;:>t::f.ls ...... .. <. . _.,.. F c... .s. ..... iu ,a. ... .....__.. .,.. ...x.. Y R r ........_..r. -tom..._.... .. .E .x _ . ,-..xt u.� ...s _..: > �_. e'� tx%1. ..._.s { ._... sttn _I me ft t !e ntao .. & �....� r . __ . xrc. � 9 { >.. E , _ P r ., _. « ..�. �> o- u. x.. ,.... .. 9 ,. �.... ..... .v. at �' a ! i yE ,._.. rc... z. t. F .. r. F..>... 'h o ... .,_ ...;.f.,s ...r.� iY.. -. �J-S .. 1, .. . ...._.._.... 't. + ... , a c .«e.. .� ..... ........ �'^.s:,... .r:. .... adv �, :;.d..wE-,.x„3..�+.1._;�.«.�Ft.x6,4.-=>maw„*ax.';.x_..�akFzk'$«��n..;ap-1,;,.d3_..ri. �r,�s m.ix'.�.::,.k... �: _{.�iAP<.k�kah_r_.k+.«.:.i",� ..., ... 5 e. :.. .{ ,....... e t ...>.. ... _>3 ._:. . ,., ._ �.. ... r ..,. ..,. Es ,. eco mm �,. � t en r , R ton P fit .rt .. .. ::z.. �'E . x...G. I..e _... ... ...z. y.3..x... ,. ...-:.. E. .. «.... 1 ... _.....:.x, .. ..., '. .,. .. .. ''d ..i.. v.. .. i .'. ..... z ,.... ... wn: xrs >++'x.iMC. Jew. 1 X J �-:�k�:. "E.,,EE � �..t 30 .• • 30210 Provide maximum access and recreational opportunities while maintaining public safety, protecting public rights, private property and overuse Policy: Recreational activities on the beach should be maintained both during the daylight hours and night hours. • New lighting was installed in 1993. The City owns and maintains all street lighting near beach and 50% of lighting throughout the City. Repairs are made based on quarterly reviews and resident requests. The Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan (5/1/90) identifies the following 9 (nine) parks within the Coastal Zone: Shaffer, Valley Park, Greg Jarvis Memorial, Biltmore Site (Noble Park), Clark Stadium, Community Center Complex, South Park, Kay-Etow, and 8th & Valley • The City owns and maintains these parks. Maintenance and repairs are done daily and as needed. • Section 12.28 of the Municipal Code addresses temporary or special events. The use of the beach area is not clearly addressed. • The Strand bike -path is resurfaced as necessary by the Public Works Department who maintains the strand through scheduled cleaning and repairs. Refer to Section 17.37.040 of the Draft Local Coastal Program regarding Temporary/Special Events in the Coastal Zone. 31 . See Row 30 Program: Improved and more functional lighting on the Strand has been provided. See Row 30 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 26 a s A PO a6fo:t'Lo tal. Ct poi! .. >r,.., _.tem CommissconRe <✓_, , .. n __ :�v.». .J .x.,_.., -e ..a4 I ,. :: u,: v e o _ . F. nfatr , ,.., r , .:.x>s/_ .,_'�3 �.�,.wex.. S.a». EF _...... ._...........,�.+"'�. _<.�� {e_rei,�. .Ili'xa ..�'c.,ai-:ia a' -.. <,.,.5,.. ., .e ,t,,,r, A'•p'. .. ,. ,....... Y ,... ...,r. , s. . xa..,. <f:11kA.ee_R-_IE •C,.A, 1 ,-_,3A fit_ .d ...-<. L�., 4 h..r �> —:. .i 32 • 30210 Provide maximum access and recreational opportunities while maintaining public safety, protecting public rights, private property and overuse Policy: Vehicular traffic, including lifeguard trucks and police cars should be barred from the beach and the Strand except for emergencies and necessary cleaning and patrolling functions. • • Section 12.20.230 of the Municipal Code specifies the allowable vehicular uses on the beach and strand. This policy is also included in the Beach Development Plan, adopted in 1972, which states that vehicular traffic on the beach and strand must be restricted to meet emergency and maintenance needs only. ' 33 • 30210 Provide maximum access and recreational opportunities while maintaining public safety, protecting public rights, private property and overuse Policy: That existing access through regular streets and walk -streets that now give everyone excellent access to and from the beach shall continue. (See appendix C, Page C-2, Figure 8). • • Access at these locations continues and is maintained. It has been the City's policy to maintain access through its public rights - of -way. Municipal Code 12.16 provides for encroachment in public right-of-ways. Public Works department overseas and maintains walk streets. There are 22 walk streets and 8 regular streets that provide direct access to the beach and strand. • Add a section on encroachments in the Draft LCP. • See Row 25. 34 • • 30210 Provide maximum access and recreational opportunities while maintaining public safety, protecting public rights, private property and overuse 30212.5 Public facilities shall be distributed throughout an area to mitigate impacts of overcrowding or overuse Policy: That the City should separate Strand uses that add to the congestion on the Strand between 10th and 15th Streets during the summer months. - • • Section 12.20.230 F of the Municipal code requires bicyclist to walk between 10th and 15th Street during congested times. This is accomplished by the use of flashing lights signs and is patrolled by the Police Department. Public restrooms, drinking fountains, and recreational facilities are located along the entire beach. In addition, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies a number of other recreation facilities in the coastal zone. • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: Policy: That the City should, in conjunction with the City of Manhattan' Beach, create a continuous and seamless beachfront bicycle and pedestrian path between the two cities. 35 • • 30222 Private lands suitable for visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities shall have priority over private uses except agriculture and coastal - dependent industry 30250 New residential, commercial, or industrial development shall be located near existing developed areas where feasible Policy: That the City should promote beach and recreational facilities related to commercial development by refining the commercial (C-2) zone to encourage commercial -recreational uses. • The permitted uses in the C-1, Neighborhood, C-2, Restricted, and C-3, General Commercial Zones , as contained in Chapter 17.26 of the Zoning Ordinance, allows visitor oriented commercial uses such as retail. commercial service, entertainment, markets, souvenirs, overnight accommodations and restaurant uses. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 27 • .. . _ .L... ., � irfor a G s _ n _ as ta[ ctPOlrc .cr._ f, .o: _.._ .. :coastal C ommrssfon R ulatro . E :. _.. ,.. . ,: a. x. ... t. ,... ... ,. t ......c t E.. 1. , k,. .. .. ..., r. .. ..x, .r 1' .Ak'fwke..e�.e.� k „�. i z I .£< y±�• :.... ^i t ...... _.i x4,. _ CIO ted:.0 indijse:Rla a ._.. t^.. t... ... .eR::. _. F ...... x 1 ..�F , ks• :.h t -<. ...a<. ... x. _. e ..».. ....E .. ..... ,. .. �. .9v' ,�%... r.x, s,�,bxt.xx:._r•,e£•xx<.,x`� ,•-.fax',^.r.:x _.A. L.xzu.LRxea...✓.aS+:e-$�>.4a,xa�`. „F. .. .'o$.v Y... .- .:., ... .. ...e........ ,-..... .t "tem . _:r. en on.... x to . tatr ., rf ....... _. ` -..... .x.Y...'it. ,.. i xb Sx .. E .✓e .. ,.. v ... .. .., N ,_ .. E.. ,.a .. a fY4. 4.�"a�,c. exY�,�.tii-el.,v,,, «'szE , ,i.te�t&»a% ,{.�� .v F ,yw.. .sk ��.`rs,. .+K .'�.t� .�u.ka..:e{'. >e...za.A ���--. . .. .. ........ xt. a'... ... a . <u.€ _ . .. �. F .... , , Reco _:.x?'.. .. .....+_ ... e a ... ?r•. .r, ...... .-:... , ... .td . ..... _. ,,.:. .. M ... ........ »Srti ��;Aufixx. ..n... W.W.. .� t f.�.:: �.S=..�n,._w.rt, �� EG 36 . • 30212.5 Public facilities shall be distributed throughout an area to mitigate impacts of overcrowding or overuse • 30213 Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided - Policy: The City, where feasible, should construct parkettes similar to the one recently constructed at 15th Street and Beach Drive. • An additional parkette has been constructed at 13th St./Strand and a small park has been established between 14th St. and 15th St. • The Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan (5/1/90) identifies nine parks within the coastal zone in addition to the beach and strand. Six of the parks are zoned as Open Space, the Biltmore site (Noble Park) and Greg Jarvis Memorial park is in a Specific Plan Area, and Kay Etow is zoned as R -P. • Hermosa Valley Elementary School is in the coastal zone providing additional recreational opportunities. • The parks adjacent to the North School Site provide additional recreational opportunities. dt.�tT..., • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: Policy: The City, where feasible, should construct parkettes and pedestrian spaces similar to the ones constructed at 13t 14th and 15th Streets and Beach Drive 37 See Row 36 d Policy: That the parkettes should be integrated with the east side of the Strand to provide rest areas with benches and that the placement of benches be distributed evenly along the Strand to avoid congestion points. See Row 36 • Amend the adopted LUP as follows: Policy: That the parkettes and pedestrian e spaces should be integrated with the east side of the Strand to provide rest areas with benches and that the placement of benches and other pedestrian amenities be distributed evenly along the Strand to avoid congestion points • 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9,doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 28 a ti>...s5 ,. .,. �,__.at ,., l*".: v. , v , C astaLA o rc _ . Ca rfamra o ct P ...x ,.. >_..... . .. .., z . s ... . .. ".. E€... _,...l. 1. s� ._. �-uy.. ,'.! ,.... myyy�_. � s f n Re u aha �-- _, ass a h � ,. ..w. ,. SRI .....>.,. x 9...'{ ... c uE - .. ... x ,, .. :,,:._ ,. *fi _. �.a_.. :... r-: . :C ,.,. , . .m .'... .: ., ,. r' t_ ., _, s." .39,. ... .... �... .i. .,L[ .. , ... .4 , ._ „ � , w .+. ». .. .- ..V .,n v.,... .Sq. , d,Goastal;Land Use,P,tao CI t , .r.,, 1., :..v .. �{.. a 'r ...,.. ..... + t .. ., ,,. .. ,. ....n .. ..,E ...,,.3» � �,., �, ,r f . 6 , .. � r �,.. r a i , , _a . s . �. .... x .� �,, . .. »%.ax•.. _i .. .y.,...»., ...: » .t:, e r .. ., ... ,. ,au ,.::... .1... , a . ;{ , ,. .. _ . ,.. .. r ,, , . ,.. . a a.. » ,_ of ., -, .. .._ ..,. .., ,. ,�,�.. �.: ,'.... ... ': ,-5�,, e::� n ?:, _E. ,. f._ ..,. ., ,E_ - „ ,. _,. _, _,Exrstan I !me ntat � , .., - , .. > mron_.. _.- ., , € . _ � 9i.,_, :.: r ,. ,-. ,.... > ..., _... :'t- .. : >...a ,.. ,. T...,a.i ..,. ,.rt,-...� _ , 6 � � �. � . � �, , , ,' ... ... w .'~r` ...» .... ._ .,. ., .,.»... . _. ,.. .. .x ,R. aM... , ,,....:.+ -,.. ,, ,�,�� � „>>fRecamme ...� ,-sfx. ,.. : .. -t= ak". .� ..,.F+,. ...;1✓z^".. 38 VRI. t < _. ...- s - s ,.....✓'£"",' 1 e ,,.e qq ' i, ...». ,,,. A. .&. �M" rn � �` df:�✓���}'` ���� /�� « .. .r -,w-. _. +, Yx .,. . +s.,:. .. ..a$ F >.. Tom; ... : ,:.,F,.... .? "y ..5. x, itfF :•.�,c 2,.. ,, u» s. � :3 �S%s':�?�F�,.«.:#?le,.Yn. �YbY:b � '6" .n"tn. +.. ,✓: .-' .;,,,:oj5 $ . ;,1 3%Asika x�a�,✓.?S'`Ta:��afzi'k�3`Y 5:;�- _ M ; - r r- xFan /,£. �%��� ✓^2'z%& -k Statement of Philosophy: Hermosa Beach is a densely developed, older community which is in transition and which is a coastal resource for the people of California. The City is approximately 98% built out. The majority of development occurs in the form of the recycling and improvements to existing structures, 39 Section 30250(a) New development shall be located in close proximity to existing developed or in areas with adequate public services and where it will not impact coastal resources Goals and Objectives: 1. To develop a stable population which is suited to available land area and community resources. These goals and objectives are implemented by Chapter 17, Zoning Ordinance. • Specifically, Chapters 17.08 , 17.10, 17.12, 17.14, 17.16, 17.18, 17.20, 17.22, and 17.24 contain residential development standards. — Chapter 17.08.010 provides development standards for single-family dwellings; ensure access to schools, parks and other community service facilities; prohibits negative impacts from adjacent nonresidential uses; protects the residential character of each neighborhood; and otherwise encourages a high iivality environment for family life and the preservation of property values. — Chapters 17.26, 17.28 contain the development standards for commercial and industrial zones. Chapters 17.30, 17.32, 17.34, and 17.36 contain the development standards and permitted uses for open space zones. These provisions allow for the development of facilities that serve the commercial, service, recreational, and residential needs of both residents and visitors. — Chapter 17.46 contains provisions addressing yard encroachments, exceptions to height limits, minimum building separation, wall and fence heights, visual clearances at intersections, lot splits and lot divisions. • Chapter 17.50 contains provisions for signs. • The City's Zoning Map defines the locations and distribution of land uses in the City. • The intent of Section 17.30.010 is to prohibit intensive urban development to those primary areas of the city which are necessary to assure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreational areas; and where such. intensive urban development would adversely affect public use and natural environmental benefits. 40 30251 Protect the scenic qualities of coastal areas and site development to protect views of the coast • 2. To preserve and enhance coastal overview and key view point areas Amend the adopted LUP to add the following policy as follows: Policy: Development in the Coastal Zone will be reviewed and permitted pursuant to the provisions of the Coastal Act and the policies and implementation programs of the City's Local Coastal Program. ' 41 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoods 3. To encourage historic preservation to maintain the eclectic character of Hermosa Beach's mixed architectural styles. The preservation of historic structures is accommodated by provisions in Section 17.52.010 (B), nonconforming uses. Section 17.30.020 permits use which are Historical Monuments and areas of historical significance. 42 • 30252 New development should maintain and enhance access to the coast by facilitating transit, non- automobile transit and adequate parking. 30254 design public works facilities to accommodate needs generated by permitted development 4. To continue to develop facilities that serve the needs of both coastal and the visitors City's residents. ty - Chapters 17.26, 17.28 contain the development standards for commercial and industrial zones. Chapters 17.30, 17.32, 17.34, and 17.36 contain the development standards and permitted uses for open space zones. These provisions allow for the development of facilities that serve the commercial, 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 29 • service, recreational, and residential needs of both residents and visitors. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 30 . . a ., ,.. .. .. :< .r :. r 3 . < _. . _... ,. .c z•w-. - .. «.:.-. ., .+.... .. .._.... ... a >: /R astal P � ._.4..., Ct> OhC �,:� j xCal►fo to i+0 �. ... .., � ...a1«I. .-t .. A. .,.... ..�.: M. ,... .<.. .... , ... . , _ . «. .. ,}, : .. a.. ., srJa. .. .. ,x .. � tion .: �o R tit �rt sta(.Ca .. <..�n SCO rYt ^ , ._. a __ 3 ... .. �. a .r ,. .:.. :�. -4 `u ., <X' e .. .... 4 :. x<?' M xS.. , X+,. ... .. t i.. , . �° E _... ..N. 11. ...,, ,3' , t� .nx.. ,. rt,. : �. I- tr,...a. x ..._, u ... .. v.,. ,a ...,. ft ... ... ... .3._ . ... ,n ..., N3 ...... .. u. ._, wry ,.. _... .. _ . � «� r. , ,. . .. l.. < ... 1 .-.. . k... f,., , t. .F. ... :`E ..... .. .r ::... �. .. 4.. _,. an Use; Ian Polrc _ . ... o to Coastal.La P ... .. ..e e. s z a ... ..a.. t _. , - £ r.,. s.... .. ,.. .. :. ,... ... ._ a ._ ,<<_ .t ._. W.: S. .. t.. k 4. at.. :. t. 1 . , s. .<... 7't.. 't � .. ...A t. 3 . .. ::. ...x_. 4 �.3` a. ..• .�. �$.. I '3' ..,...t . .f ,.:k... .. ..... >. ».. ... � ti.t _....» :. eF__a t.:,. , ,. :.. t.:W ... .: .. ... .: .. , :.. r_ - _ ._...� ., s1:, to «, ... .... ,.. .N'. a. ... .._(a<? .. KS. . :♦ z E .. 1 a}'. ... .. i .. _.. ...<.. t. x.. .... ... ... .. ..1. .W _ tx.k.. A .. _....r... k ..... t _. .. ...t. r. _.. t.�_._. ;.. _m � .� t. <, , .. � ., FEF, nt C�.. .'i . ..:: .:. ... .,a , 4....... .. :...., .. . 5a s ,. .,. +.. 4v ., o _ «Exf n tm lemediab .._ ., 9 , , F.., s n..... ..G .. «. .wt..e. � .. .. c : t_.:. b.. _ r.: ,.:..t,. �.. , .. •:. ._.. .< t.. r.. # r 1. ..d i., .... ,,. ».... , .. ». �.. k. s. 4£'. E- � .M G. .:Et .. «t {rF. .. .. .. .... «. d. ... t< ;, t .... _ eC .. ...R om"Ine -. . <ff .. .n: ..t `�. .. ,. a `i,� ,. ,.. s..... 4i rx ._. Z:a.._ .. .. r ,. ....>: ,+`,. C... . � yw .,.{n +�... ....E ,.. x .... . _.. x _.:. .«...: .,� <... . :ee_.... f Q,: ✓.. 43 • Section 30240 (c) Development in areas adjacent to environmentally sensitive habit areas and parks and recreation areas shall be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas, and shall be compatible with the continuance of those habitat and recreation areas. 5. To preserve and, where feasible, enhance the City's - remaining open space. • • Chapters 17.30, 17.32, 17.34, and 17.36 contain the development standards and permitted uses for open space zones. These provisions allow for the development of facilities that serve the commercial, service, recreational, and residential needs of both residents and visitors. The intent of Section 17.30.010 is to prohibit intensive urban development to those primary areas of the city which are necessary to assure permanent open space in and for public parks and recreational areas; and where such intensive urban development would adversely affect public use and natural environmental benefits. See Row 27 ' • Goals of the Open Space element of the General Plan are to obtain and preserve open spaces within the City, establish the beach and ocean areas as a natural recreational resource, and obtain, preserve, and enhance green areas for the health and well being of surrounding areas. • The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the development and maintenance of the City's recreational facilities. The Los Angeles Department of Harbors and Beaches is responsible for the maintenance of the beach and strand. 44 • • 30251 Protect the scenic qualities of coastal areas and site development to protect views of the coast 30251 Protect the scenic qualities of coastal areas and site development to protect views of the coast Policy: That the City should restrict building height to protect overview and view shed qualities and preserve the City's existing low-rise profile. - • - The height limits are described in the City's zoning Ordinance and vary by zone as follows: The height limit in the R-1 and R -1A zones is 25 feet and two stories ' [Sections 17.08.030 (A) and 17.10.020 (A)]. - The height limit in the R-2 and R -2B zones is 30 feet [Sections 17.12.020 (A) and 17.14.020 (A)]. - The height limits in the R-3 zone is to 30 feet [Section 17.16.020 (A)]. The purpose and intent of this section is to set a standard height limit for most projects in scale with existing development and to minimize view obstruction. A maximum height of 35 feet is allowed with approval of a = Conditional Use Permit in cases where surrounding existing structures exceed 30 feet and would not impact the views and access to sun and air of adjacent properties. The height exception is subject to specific design standards. 5/9/00 45 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 31 See Row 44 Program: Zoning and building codes limit the height of all structures depending on zone. The maximum height in each residential R-1, R- 2 and R-3 zones are 25 ft., 30 ft., and 35 ft. respectively. The maximum height in the City is 45 ft- or three stories and is in the commercial zones. — The height limit in the R -P zone is 30 feet and provides identical provisions for a maximum 35 foot height as the R-3 zone [Section -17.20.020 (A)]. - The height limit in the C-1 and C-2 zones, the commercial zones in the Coastal Zone, was reduced to thirty (30) feet by a vote of the people in November of 1991, this is reflected in Section 17.26.050 (E) of the Zoning Code. - The height limit in the C-3 zone is 35 feet [Section 17.20.020 (A)]. - Section 17.46.010 contains provisions allowing architectural elements, such as chimneys, vents and stairways to exceed the height limits of the base - zoning district by eight feet (8'). This section addresses height exceptions in commercial and residential zones separately. - Section 17.46.240 contains provisions specifying that antenna and satellite dishes may exceed the height limit of the base -zoning district by twelve feet (12') of surface area. • Amend the Certified Land Use Plan as follows: Program: Zoning and building codes limit the height of all structures depending on zone. ‘R-land-R-3-zenee-ace4646-30-ftrand 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis • The following sections contain provisions that relate to height limits, building separation and encroachments that effect view sheds: Page 32 Section 17.46.020 maintains that required yards be open and unobstructed to the sky. Section 17.46.030 requires a building separation of eight feet (8') between main buildings on the same lot. Section 17.46.060 provides standards for visual clearances on comers. Within ten feet (10') of the corner foliage and fences are limited to 36 inches, unless they provide at least an eight -foot (8') clearance. Sections 17.46.070 contain provisions for architectural features, such as cornices, sills, pilasters, bay windows and greenhouse windows to encroach into the required yards. 17.46.080 contain provisions for fireplaces to encroach into the required yards. 17.46.090 contain provisions for fire escapes to encroach into the required yards. 17.46.100 contain provisions for stairways and balconies to encroach into the required front yard. 17.46.46.110 contain provisions for uncovered, solid stairs that are on grade to encroach into the required side yards. 17.46.120 contain provisions for guardrails that are nor more than 42 inches in height to encroach into the required yards. — Section 17.46.130 contains provisions that limit the height of walls, fences and hedges to 42 inches in the front setbacks and six feet (6') elsewhere on the property with the exception of the required visual clearance on corner lots. A wall complying with the above standards is allowed above a retaining walls that protect a cut below natural grade, whereas the retaining wall counts toward the total height of the wall if it contains fill. • Some areas in the coastal zone (see the Attachment XX), Summary of Zone Changes) have been rezoned to a lower intensity classification and as a result are subject to more restrictive height limits. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 33 xi 1 o a c rf a tal. At... of c . __. . .._Goas io . _e ulatj tal_Gommrss n . t._ ....:s. ..... ,.. I....._.. » .. .. na.. <.:. _. <.>-, .la�da^.._a,£.e3 ,- .. aia:� oas d Us .planp rc � _ � � Y ..:..<,..+C�eJXfeu:�fu....s.:.YrE.,°sls.u?�Hx,..k,�^Y. rv, 4- e.. «�xxain._a_,a„,<axm.,,_uc�m..5tt5t1�ebw�»u1 .�. rta,y:_iaid > .. , ... s n !m iementa i _ ,., ton m < /{ _ �_ _.� , , , . xi.. n :. .._ ,e M. �.. ,.. a.. ,E Y'. , ,} ... ✓u <. t.. « l .FEE .k, d..N..k F.: •t=m& 5k 4;::kxi..,"�i`u£.��C`��iF F�x�dS_�$,-�.,�'&'kr,iA >>.�a�>_..E �. �t;:.t�°, ,. �_.a�'3-" �uSr S: Cc��.5�ud�wh„a'h.�u ,.+z>z, ....,. R omm � . � _ x.., ec en atcon _J�"'n .. 1..,, ;2•tu1+xi..flarer..e.�Y"e ot�+1.. r<.2P,.. `'�'F.�£h: ,.:.aat ..,-`>�'.�»i��a, _�.a�xi�i,.�{<Ef�f!;` 46 . • 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoods Policy: Establish residential condominium approval procedure that will encourage the development of units that will contribute to and are consistent with the evolving character of the City. The City has established a CUP requirement for condominiums as contained in Chapter 17.22 of the Zoning Ordinance. Chapter 17.58 requires a Precise Development Plan (PDP) review for all residential projects of 2 -units or more, and all commercial projects except those that involve a remodel of 1500 square feet or less. Chapter 17.52, Nonconforming Structures and Uses, allows limited remodeling and expansion of existing dwellings that may be nonconforming to zoning standards. This supports the policy of consistency with evolving character in that some older and perhaps historical types are maintained to allow for a sense of history and permanence. 47 See Row 46 Program: The current condominium ordinance, which includes design and building permit review, are programs that support this policy. See Row 46 48 • 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoods • 30251 Protect the scenic qualities of coastal areas and site development to protect views of the coast Policy: That the zoning and general plan will be made consistent. The City has completed its consistency hearings for property within the coastal zone and all areas have been made consistent. All areas were made consistent after proper. noticing and public hearings between 1986 and 1990. The changes are detailed in Attachments XX and XX. 49 SHermosa See Row 48 Program: In the November 1980 election, the citizens of Beach voted that whenever there was a conflict between the Zoning Code and the General Plan, that whichever designation bad the lesser density that density should apply The Planning Commission started hearings to resolve the conflicts beginning January of 1981. Until such time that consistency is accomplished between the General Plan and Zoning, the General Plan will guide land use decisions. See Row 48 • Amend the Certified Land Use Plan as follows: Program: The City began the process to resolve inconsistencies between the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map in 1981, and resolved the inconsistencies within the Coastal Zone by 1990. - - - decisions: 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 34 17..• .Row t� . v .. .. vv rt , ... ... ,..<. ,.. .. ,..r .... ...:.-,....., c. lw.... _.... ,.. ,._. , zr . .. .... ..: .....a .Y . 4 _. _, ,.,.. _. . Ca ifornia . . _ w,. 9 �. xx _ , u .m p � ,» � , _ »> � « ,�.r. < n w _ . : , _.. � ,, � �, , ,� , _ .. b 'k t. �.'sa. �..rt�'A i a x,� � .� ... of . n„ u.. ,.. .... f z... . .. ... ''° ..ax�w . _ . �<,.. R .rc ..+._ �?r.. ._z , k uat,o a .o ms sion. e , < ._ oastat m R r! a J. r ... .r h„ ....bs. s;,,. t v,.4 ...r..i4 ., ... r .. x. .. .. ,:.x . Yk w rte'-.ti:w ,� r «e } .!'T-,. ...,v v. a.. t�-:: ..�,.. e .. __,. ..., -. .7{_ .. .. a, ..v .L.. K. c^.. ,. �.,:.. ,..... :. .. ., :'�.. _x.. ,. ._ . , � .. .:.. _ 4 ,< Coa nd U e an o i o e s{.� t- s P L c :: - ..... ,.. ,. � t � lQi A� ., ' ... � x .. � r.....:... � . « . r,. .+ v. ,. 4 . v. .. ... .l . ...<R , ry ....N.tv .... .x �r r , 1 . v o . r ...Mi. I' ...,.. t. .}. .. v ... .-. .,, , x... t .... F � i ,_.,.. ,krt., � , ��� r.., ,.� � _...._ 5 ... „ i . «. ... r ... .... -... .. xr. .. 3 r ,. .. ..: .. .,.: vF.. ...u_. ....x. �.. t „, i+. .... F .. , ....: t:r:i, ys:r..:. .... . .,...... i. ..�.>. .... i... ... :.� .. _,. -,- _. ._w., _ r.�.,-.M. „ .. .. < _ ki. Exi i lm le n n � k. z_ . stn a t,o ,, . { �., �_ , � m. to k _� � . r� � 1� , � E ., i. t t .. � .: - t` ,r s. (.. _ ,. _., ... .,. .:. t Rv w.... .. ....v. , rF »..n w. .. .. ) ... x..e.. f. .1.,.. ,i'.9. n .,. ,, r tiE.. .. �.. z �. �� ...., .. ..M ...,.E!- :... }.... ..v rc., . . Sr"mxs'.. v.x .d,. _. r % r ...y ,,.._ _ �.. , .. .. x a E ... .. a ......._ .._ , .. .. -, �. eco mendatron.. ,. r.,., _� �. , S x�. - i ,,..... },. v :fx. 1✓.. 3^ ,. .. ik� _ 50 • 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoodsfollows: • 30251 Protect the scenic qualities of coastal areas and site development to protect views of the coast Policy: That a special overlay zone for the development of large parcels of land should be enacted. The planned development zone for commercial areas was eliminated and the residential planned development zone is recommended for elimination. These sections have never been used and have become obsolete since provisions for what they permitted, regulated and/or prohibited have been included in one or more of the following: 1. Standard zoning classifications 2. Designated Specific Plan Areas 3. The Precise Development Plan process • Amend the Certified Land Use Plan as Policy: The City should always encourage creativity in commercial, and residential development, allowing variety and flexibility, while maintaining high standards of design. That a 51 - See Row 50 Program: The City Council in November of 1980, passed the Planned Development Zone. The intent of this overlay zone is to encourage a creative approach in commercial and residential development, allow variety and flexibility while maintaining high standards of design. See Row 50 e - • The City explored but found it infeasible to implement this special overlay zone. Delete LUP program regarding an overlay zone and replace with the following: Program: The City will continue its current Precise Development Plan process to ensure flexibility and quality in all residential and commercial development. Cleraigf • Amend the adopted LUP to add the following program to provide design guidance in the Downtown area: Policy: The City should continue to maintain high standards of design for public works projects and public improvement programs, including the redevelopment of the streetscape at upper and lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue in the downtown area. Program: The City will continue to utilize the City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan, dated October 1994, as a guideline for the design and development of the streetscape at upper and lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 35 ow. r.. k `W.a�t .. rfornra Coasta I a .: tr c _e? .r .., E• -St.. ... a. pry.., Qmrruss n R ulat_ n ....<.. Y. .-: s. e( xw s1 ifra ns _S,.k...ee.. .e.sa. �hu.ria..xau ax. .m.E.,•4.4oi.tt,,<.aFra_x.�F x<xi.:_�as _, ted Coa ta[" s nd se Plan � F 3. .., r}.... 3., r ..::- ......E t ..,. ::... . ._+,xi. .<,„._.,r.,xxt..~ra.. ,..,.uk _ _.. „t i� P».tr<sx. f�..!+Fe E. .. :A.. stm'&.m x. <.... xm- ..t. . .-. lemen an fir. t�;r r. � .. .... �. fir.,. :�. a.. w h P .x .. . �>,... ... > r A. .,.,_ a-.. ... , x, r...,}..x. x v'..Mkxe x, .xw.,.<&'-:«.Rk'�.Y ...j,<,• -:i. IxEEk e. �..-f .,�:amt.. x»,.tXar.,e.. i;H.r$w9�rRf{�5,3`,4-R.. ...,... 5.3.k.,E ,.t-. ....:... ..}., . r3 _ ..... .. com a x._ a. ." ... ...... , ...._,�.r . ,.. _. .,...... _.r... .. ,.. ,. ,t.., brttR. .+xxy.E•. .Y..e. &r':. Sa ..�kl.. n..:. F1'C� �._ th;..�e'-.e.-..,-.--y51.,�F, ..- 52 • 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoods • 30213 Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided Policy: That the City has recognized the need for a comprehensive downtown plan and consequently has enacted PAID to examine the needs of the downtown commercial area. • The Parking and Improvement District (PAID) is no longer in effect. It was replaced by the Downtown Enhancement District (DED) that was formed to address the issues related to the provision of a validated parking program and the investigation of providingmore public parkingspaces. 9 P P • A plan has been adopted (R/UDAT), and is currently being implemented by the DED. • The City's Land Use Plan was adopted in 1994 and incorporated the R/UDAT Plan (Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team from the AIA) recommended goals and policies for the revitalization of the downtown which included a plan for parking. .3 • Amend the LUP policy as follows: - 53 See Row 52 Program: City has enacted PAID with an appointed Commission to represent the business district. The Commission shall adopt a plan for downtown development. See Row 52 d • Amend the LUP policy as follows: 54 411, • 30254 design public works facilities to accommodate needs generated by permitted development • Section 30253 New development shall assure stability and structural integrity or require the construction of protective devices the would substantially alter natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs Policy: Although the LUP proposed no additional construction of structures seaward of the mean high tide 9 line, the City recognizes the need to maintain consistency with provisions required for shoreline structures in other jurisdictions. • This program is still in effect, but since no such shoreline projects have been undertaken it has never been invoked. • City's General Pian Open Space goals are to regulate and prevent use of lands determined to be hazardous due to underlying geological conditions, soil instability, flooding or other natural hazards. • Beach Development Plan recommends that no additional structures should be allowed on the beach except public restrooms and lifeguard structures. See Row 27 See Row 54 Program: "Revetments, breakwaters, groins, harbor channels, seawalls, cliff retaining walls, and other such construction that alters natural shoreline processes shall be permitted when required to serve coastal -dependent uses or to protect existing structures or public beaches in danger from erosion and when designed and constructed to minimize erosive impact on adjacent unprotected property and minimize encroachment on to the beach and shall indicate all area seaward of the seawall for lateral access for the public. 56 • 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoods Policy: That rehabilitation of commercial -residential structures be encouraged to preserve the City's historical buildings and cultural heritage. • Section 17.52 of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows for the maintenance and modification to structures that do not conform to the underlying development standards. As stated in Section 17.52.010 (B), one of the goals of this section is to encourage the restoration and maintenance of historical residential structures. • Amend the LUP policy as follows: Policy: Encourage the preservation of the City's historical buildings and cultural heritage. (Existing policy reworded and 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 36 ... ow ... :.. .. .t:, tai. I a C to Ct.POIIC �. .., a lfaml oas l A _ _ __. .. l�:rs.... ,, ,... s' ,,:...Coastal Cammrssron. a ulation. ,. 9 .. a d^� ... 1'.: uwasa .<4: ..., .. .k .,. ria _ ,, �.u.:.ih..:.t.. .... e . „ ..... , ; . ..... .. ... €s. .... ...... .. .. .. , .� .. • .. ,I.. .i .+ ..E_.. ,.. ... ..n do f d C a 1 rt ., e sta La d `tlse a r , . p , Pl n Pa _ .h .. • ..ra xa ,. . _ � • . , ... .. _ _ ... ,mnY .. a...,,. , ..rs. :::x x. • < k.:•x 1.... ..n .... ..._ 4 � :, ., :. ,a:.=. :.. .,. .. xl ... .e. .. . ...., < Y fix, .r s l I >ti , < � �, , t m )amen ..- .. %.. . � to n9 P � .... .. . _. ., .... ..,x.... .Y}..... .S`. ..y. { , m r .. . ,.;. co nd n, 1, 'v.. .. • In 1998, the City adopted Section 17.53 for the purpose of the "protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of historic resources such as buildings, structures, sites, and places within the City that reflect special elements of the City's architectural, artistic, cultural, historical, political, and social heritage." This section describes the necessary steps to designate and protect the City's historic resources. relocated to the existing policy section). residential structures be encouraged to sulturage. Program: In November 1998 the City4 conducted a survey of historic resources, adopted a historic preservation ordinance, and designated a historic landmark. 57 • Section 30250(a) New development shall be located in close proximity to existing developed or in areas with adequate public services and where it will not impact coastal resources Policy: The Zoning Code will be examined to remove d unnecessary impediments to the recycling of existing commercial and residential structures. • • The Zoning Ordinance was examined and there are no unnecessary impediments to recycling commercial or residential structures. Chapter 17.52 contains provisions for the maintenance, expansion, and alteration of non -conforming structures. • Amend the LUP policy as follows: Policy: The Zoning Code will be examined to remove unnecessary impediments to the recycling rehabilitation of existing commercial and residential structures. 58 • Section 30250(a) New development shall be located in close proximity to existing developed or in areas with adequate public services and where it will not impact coastal resources Policy: That the City encourage coastal related commercial land uses within the downtown area. • • Coastal related special events, such as volleyball tournaments, surfing competitions, etc., are supported and encouraged. The Department of Community Resources overseas permit applications as required by the Coastal Act. All necessary permits are obtained from the Coastal Commission. Commercial -tourist oriented businesses such as hotels, restaurants, bars, beach rental equipment continue to exist, and are permitted by the underlying zoning district (C-1, C-2). • Amend the LUP. policy as follows: Policy hat: -the City Encourage coastal related visitor -serving commercial land uses within the downtown area. 1 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 37 ✓e!,a ...... .x.. .: i. � .... 4 .... . a t o: ta:G s l f rn oa tat Act P_,olrc 1 , .. .. .r.u� .. i:... .. s.... Y. .. . .. .... ,t -F ... .Y ?•,... ... wt'il P A.. / ._ ... ,.... .... 4.. .a.. .x>: _.. ' '.. ,.. .. _ . ...� as .. Carnmrssro !2 a an N. .n.. ,.. .r.. ... .s . .. s.......�. � • � .. xx. - ..a. _......_.. a..e F_. ..ar.. e._.. . x x,., .,:•,,, naw..,e. _ra.v.. ...1..� ......,. 4s_t'A i �n,w "4svV. t..�. "1.. .. .... .. » ... er.._ 1. aastaf La I. � .. '•7 7. ., is fix. �_..>.. }E. , ... ... _. .�' ... a,.. t., ..,s.. _.... fir.. ,- >n. ..-. ,{s.,.,....z.. SL .r,. mr.m:.zn. sS,Si.£,. ,. _d:a,b vZ.:.,.:>.tt,,,.Ft.....>�,a...wm"4x,,,. n`fuk_: w..Hx-.sk t . �._ .f-_ ; r _.. , _, u � .: _ . ... ... ... ..... ., .. ...._. Y .. .. ....., r .. 2 4.i.... µ��„ _ .._, stir '"� i _z . .......n _.. .men Patron_ .�xr_ , Er.. e... ,, w .... t « � t.._, a .... ,. ......,., z E .._ x. . � , M.K._r.'Y.:4,�.+&c^',.. <'.',„r:,,vPa eS.._.�a..4:i.. sw.A..vr..4+1:��-_`.-� s.. -7".i "Xv. ..E �:-* /.�,.SaaF`Sk v,.; si i _ . '�- ,.e. _..:✓... � .,. .. G ..... z« Y ...:�. ,.... E ,+d_;afd ✓ r•.e 'J .a L G., w.':o{ur. 59 11110 • Section 30250(a) New development shall be located in close proximity to existing_ developed or in areas with adequate public services and where it will not impact coastal resources Policy: Develop design standards for development of the Biltmore Site and other City owned property which are in keeping with the scale and character of the area. ..tii>., a�'x,.L�cE .wri By a vote of the public the "Biltmore" site has been zoned and developed as an open space park. (California Coastal Commission permit 5-97=011 Al approved 7/98) • All projects, including development on City owned property, require approval of a Precise Development Plan (PDP), as outlined in Chapter 17.58 of the Zoning Ordinance, Single family structures and remodels or additions of less than 1,500 square feet are exempt. The purpose of the PDP is to achieve a reasonable level of quality, compatibility, in harmony with the community's social, economic and environmental objectives, and to protect existing and potential developments and uses on adjacent and surrounding property. ...: �ws,�kbu a � • Amend the LUP policy as follows: 60 • 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoods Policy: That the City will maintain the existing commercial- recreational orientation in the downtown area. • The C-1, C-2, C-3, and O -S land use categories of the City's General Plan provide for commercial and recreational uses. The Commercial designations allow for a variety of commercial and recreational uses and facilities. The Open Space designation allows for uses comprised of recreational, leisure, cultural and aesthetic purposes. • Permitted uses in the zoning ordinance include such uses as hotels, restaurants, beach -related rental equipment, fish and tackle shops, surfboard shops, and entertainment. • Amend the LUP policy as follows: Polioyi-That-the-Gity-kvttl-maiotain downto w n arm 61 • 30251 Protect the scenic qualities of coastal of the coaareas stite development to protect views Policy: That the City construct, where appropriate, landscaping along the east side -of the Strand in order to improve the aesthetic appearance of the Strand. • The landscaping has been accomplished at the termination of several walk - streets and the establishment of a small park on the east side of the Strand between 14th and 15th St. 62 • 30253(5) Protect special communities and neighborhoods Policy: The Biltmore Site is a vital asset of the people of Hermosa Beach. The people concur that the most beneficial public recreational, and environmental use for this coastal This Policy and Program have been implemented. The Biltmore site has been developed onto a park with grass, trees, and walkways.oastal Y (California( Commission permit 5-97-011 Al) • Amend the LUP policy as follows: Policy: The former Biltmore Site, known as Noble Park and North Pier Parking Structure, is a vital asset of the people of Hermosa Beach. The This coastal site is public open space and beach public parking. 5/9/00 coastmatrix5-9.doc City of Hermosa Beach Draft LUP and Implementation Measure Consistency Analysis Page 38 .:Row .: e��ti 3<y ,.t.. n.¢. ._ iN....... .. _ , a ial � is 1 . r.. .0 I f m s c Pa f _>r ,, �. , a t o__ta,Ca A , .. _ < _ Md .Coastal .0 om ulat on.. ,sa r__ hu..,,£ e...mK.t _xa««... r'ia.. ., ,�—.e .._F .'>n. Na.:. f, i r.x . _... .,. ._. _. , . ., .Lan oastal dUse... :.... .. .. _.; Y . .. ... h. ... .... .. .... x ., < ._... , ... .. ... . . ..... ,, .. ttn dm i , � ementatr n s f r , E w o _. £ E f:: < 4, .,. ..:: .vf , ,,. .. t._.... .. .. ....,.... d , , .._..ft<v x.< ,b...«,.Y.<.t ,a<�._,....... .,r..N. _. .a.., e � :::�.,m.,_ . t.z. rte:: :.... ._ ,... .a. ._.. v r o m n �� .. ,� ec m e i n ..R dat a ....:,.. �. ,. f, rix .,.... .. .,.e z+,4r ca _..z... , t u:34:.:... t•.: e,n .. IC ,. �R.--,.;?` 63 See Row 62 Program: The certified land use designations for the publicly owned property known as the Biltmore Site are as follows (Amended by vote of the people November 5, 1992). 1. The. designation for the property specifically known as the Biltmore Site is Restricted Open Space (O -S-2), to ensure its preservation and use as a public park. 2. The designation for that part of the Biltmore Site known as Parking Lot C is commercial/Publicgeach Parking. s See Row 62 • Amend the LUP policy as follows: Program: The certified land use designations for the publicly owned property known as the Biltmore Site are as follows (Amended by vote of the ii people November 5, 1992). 1. The designation for the property specifically known as the Biltmore Site, known as Noble Park, is Restricted Open Space (O -S-2), to ensure its preservation and use as a public park. 2. The designation for that part of the Biltmore Site known as Parking -Let -G known as the North Pier Parking Structure is commercial/Public Beach Parking. (s) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAILII]1.NII A ngieside Dry' Morningside Dr Mahattan:AX —13 0 'L • ittigiteMan • .-.+raw:::.:`'"'�:'•::^<:::?dNV. COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARY PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTRICT B9UNDARY. • PARKING METER LOCATIONS (24-HOUR YELLOW & 2 -HOUR SILVER METERS) CITY OF H I RMO SA BEACH: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ON -STREET PARKING (RESTRICTED 1 -HOUR PUBLIC PARKING 10AM - 1OPM) 01' SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 CITY COUNCIL DRAFT Revised 5797db CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Implementing Ordinance Submitted to: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council and Planning Commission Submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER MAY 9, 2000 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION • I Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.318.0242 Fax 310.937.6235 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714.966.9220 Fax: 714.966.9221 E-mail: costamesa anplanningcentercom CITY COUNCIL DRAFT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Implementing Ordinance Submitted to: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Council and Planning Commission Submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER MAY 9, 2000 A, INTRODUCTION The following document presents the proposed implementing ordinance portion of the City of Hermosa Beach Local Coastal Program as recommended by the Planning Commission. The proposed ordinance would apply to the portion of the City that is located within the Coastal Zone, except in the original jurisdiction of the.Coastal Commission as provided in Section 17 3? 060 Revisions made pursuant to the City Attorney's final review and Input froth the Coastal Commission's attorney are highlighted City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 1 i • CHAPTER 17.37 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE 17.37.010 Purpose 17.37.020 Definitions 17.37.030 Permit Required 17.37.040 Exemptions and Categorical Exclusions 17.37.050 Coastal Development Permit Applications 17.37.060 Determination of Jurisdiction 17.37.070 Resolving Jurisdictional Determination Disputes 17.37.080 Coastal Development Permit Notice Requirements 17.37.090 Coastal Development Permit Public Hearings 17.37.100 Coastal Development Permit Approval or Denial Findings 17.37.110 Conditions of Approval 17.37.120 Notice of Action and Appeal Rights 17.37.130 Appeals 17.37.140 Expiration of Unused Permits 17.37.150 Amendments to Coastal Development Permit Permits 17.37.160 Reapplication 17.37.170 Revocation of Coastal Development Permits 17.37.190 Enforcement 17.37.190 Emergency Coastal Development Permits 17.37.200 Continuing Validity of Permit 17.37.210 Local Coastal Program Amendments 17.37.220 Encroachments 17.37.230 Downtown Implementation Plan 17.37.240 Water Quality 17.37.250 Temporary/Special Event Calendar 17.37.010 Purpose. The regulations of this Chapter shall apply in the Coastal Zone, as defined by the California Coastal Act and map prepared by the California Coastal Commission and zoned as Coastal Zone Overlay (-CZ) on the City's Zoning Map. The Coastal Development Permit is established to ensure that public or private development within the Coastal Zone conforms to the policies and programs of the California Coastal Act (Division 20 of the Public Resources Code) as amended, the City of Hermosa Beach Certified Local Coastal Program, the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and any_implementation programs. 17.37.020 Definitions Definitions of terms not contained herein, shall be the same those terms are defined in Coastal Act. "Appealable Development" means any development project that may be appealed to the Commission and is located within or constitutes any of the following: I. Approval of a development project located within any appealable area, as follows: a. All areas between the sea and first public road paralleling the sea or within three hundred (300) feet of the inland extent of any beach or the mean high tide line of the sea where there is no beach, whichever is the greater distance. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 2 Draft Implementing Ordinance b. All areas within one hundred (100) feet of any wetland, estuary, or stream and all areas within three hundred (300) feet of the top of the seaward face of any coastal bluff. 2. Approval or denial of a development project that constitutes a major public works project or a major energy facility. 3. Approvals of developments that require an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. "Applicant" means the person, partnership, corporation, or state or local government agency applying for a Coastal Development Permit. "Approving Authority" means a City officer, City Council, or commission approving a Coastal Development Permit. "Coastal Commission" means the California Coastal Commission. "Coastal Development Permit" means a permit issued by the City of Hermosa Beach, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, approving development in the CZ Overlay District as being in conformance with the Local Coastal Program. A Coastal Development Permit includes all application materials, plans and conditions on which the approval is based. "Coastal Policy Checklist" means a form prepared and completed by the Director as a guide for reviewing a Coastal Development Permit application for conformance with the Local Coastal Program. It shall list appropriate application information, all relevant Local Coastal Program policies, those policies with which the application does not comply, and recommended conditions, if any, which could be imposed to bring the application into compliance. "Coastal Zone" means that portion of the Coastal Zone, as established by the Coastal Act of 1976 and as it may subsequently be amended, that lies within the City of Hermosa Beach, as indicated on a map on record with the Department of Community Development. "Development" means on land, in or under water, the placement or erection of any solid material or structure; discharge or disposal of any materials; grading, removing, dredging, mining, or extraction of any materials; change in the density or intensity of use of land, including, but not limited to, subdivision pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with Section 66410 of the Government Code), and any other division of land, including lot splits, except where the land division is brought about in connection with the purchase of such land by a public agency for public recreational use; change in the intensity of use of water, or of access thereto; construction, reconstruction, demolition. or alteration of the size of any structure, including any facility of any private, public, or municipal utility; and the removal or harvesting of major vegetation other than for agricultural purposes, kelp harvesting and timber operations. "Director" means the City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Director. "Emergency" means a sudden unexpected occurrence demanding immediate action to prevent or mitigate loss or damage to life, health, property or essential public services City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 3 Draft Implementing Ordinance "Local Coastal Program" means the City's land -use plans, Planning and Zoning Ordinances, zoning maps, and implementation actions certified by the Coastal Commission as meeting the requirements of the California Coastal Act of 1976. "Major Public Works Project" means: 1. A public works project that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) in its estimated cost of construction with an automatic increase in accordance with the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index, except for those governed by the provisions of Public Resources Code Sections 30610, 30610.5, 301611 or 30624. 2. Not withstanding the criteria in (1), "major public works" also means publicly financed recreational facilities that serve, affect, or otherwise impact regional or statewide use of the facilities. "Other Permits and Approvals" means permits and approvals, other than a Coastal Development Permit, required by the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning or Municipal Code before a development may proceed. "Overlay District" means a set of zoning requirements, described in the ordinance text and mapped, which is imposed in addition to the requirements of one or more underlying districts. Development in such districts must comply with the requirements of both the Overlay District and the underlying base zoning district and Area District. "Pemittee" means the person, partnership, corporation or agency issued a Coastal Development Permit. "Project" means any development as defined in this section. "Sea" means the Pacific Ocean and all harbors, bays, channels, estuaries, salt marshes, sloughs, and other areas subject to tidal action through -any connection with the Pacific Ocean excluding non -estuarine rivers, streams, tributaries, creeks, and flood control and drainage channels. "Sensitive coastal resource areas" means those identifiable and geographically bounded land and water areas within the Coastal Zone of vital interest and sensitivit. "Sensitive coastal resources areas" include the following: 1. Special marine and land habitat areas, wetlands, lagoons, and estuaries as mapped and designated in the coastal plan. 2. Areas possessing significant recreational value. 3. Highly scenic areas. 4. Archaeological sites referenced in the California Coastline and Recreation Plan or as designated by the State Historic Preservation Officer. 5. Special communities or neighborhoods which are significant visitor destination areas. 6. Areas that provide existing coastal housing or recreational opportunities for low- and moderate - income persons. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 4 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • 7. Areas where divisions of land could substantially impair or restrict coastal access. "Temporary/Special Event" is an activity or use that does not exceed a two week period on a continual basis, or does not exceed a consecutive four month period on an intermittent basis. A Temporary/Special Event involves the placement of non -permanent structures, such as film sets and equipment, bleachers, perimeter fencing, vendor tents/canopies, judging stands, trailers, portable toilets, sound/video equipment, stages, platforms, which do not involve grading or landform alteration for installation, and/or exclusive use of a sandy beach, parkland, water, streets or parking area which is otherwise open and available for general public use. "Exclusive use" means a use that precludes use in the area of the event for public recreation, beach access or access to coastal waters other than for or through the event itself. 17.37.030 Permit Required A. Coastal Development Permit Required. Any development in the Coastal Zone shall obtain a Coastal Development Permit, with the exception of projects identified in Section 30519 (b) of the Public Resources Code or a development specifically exempted by Section 17.37.040 this Division. B. Determination of Exemption or Categorical Exclusion. A determination of whether a development is exempt or categorically excluded from the Coastal Development Permit requirements shall be made by the Director at the time an application is submitted for development within the Coastal Zone pursuant to Section 17.37.040. Any dispute arising from the Director's determination shall be resolved pursuant to the procedure described in Section 17.37.070. C. Existing Coastal Development Permits or Applications in Process. The following shall apply to existing applications for Coastal Development Permits or existing Coastal Development Permits: 1. Development authorized by a permit issued by the California Coastal Commission shall remain under the jurisdiction of the Commission for the purposes of compliance, amendment, extension, reconsideration and revocation. 2. Any proposed development that the City preliminarily approved before effective certification of the Local Coastal Program and which has not been filed complete with the Commission, shall be re- - submitted to the City through an application for a permit pursuant to the Local Coastal Program. 3. Any proposed development that the City preliminarily approved before effective certification of the Local Coastal Program and which has been filed complete with the Commission may, at the option of the applicant, remain with the Commission for review. Projects that elect to obtain a coastal permit from the Coastal Commission shall remain under the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in (1) above. 4. Upon effective certification of the Local Coastal Program, no applications for development within the certified area shall be accepted by the California Coastal Commission. 17.37.040 Exemptions and Categorical Exclusions A. Exemptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the following projects as long as ttat pe#1.19.11.14 all applicable zoning standards bre satisfied; and whef no discretionary zoning approvals are necessary: ` 1. Additions to existing single-family residences and ancillary structures such as garages, swimming pools, fences, storage sheds and landscaping with the exception of the following: City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 5 a. Development that involves a risk of adverse environmental effect pursuant to Section 13250, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. b. Improvements to any structure in the appealable area when such improvements could result in any of the following: (1) (2) (3) An increase of 10 percent or more of the internal floor area of existing structure(s) on the building site or an additional increase in floor area bringing the aggregate increase to 10 percent or more. The construction of an additional story or loft or increase in building height of more than 10 percent. The construction, placement or establishment of any significant detached structure such as a garage. c. Any significant alteration of land forms including removal or placement of vegetation on a beach, wetland, or sand dune, or within 50 feet of the edge of a coastal bluff or stream, or in areas of natural vegetation designated by resolution of the Coastal Commission as a significant natural habitat. 2. The maintenance, alteration or addition to existing structures, other than a single-family residence or public works facilities, provided the project does not involve: a. An adverse effects as -'specified in Section 13253, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. b. Any improvement to a structure that changes the intensity of use or use of the structure. c. Any significant alteration of land forms including removal or placement of vegetation on a beach, wetland or sand dune, or within 100 feet of the edge of a coastal bluff or stream or in areas of natural vegetation designated by resolution of the Coastal Commission as a significant natural habitat. 3. Repair or maintenance activities that do not result in an addition, enlargement or expansion unless classified as: a. Repair or maintenance of a seawall revetment, breakwater, groin, culvert, outfall or similar shoreline work that involves: (1) Substantial alteration of the foundation, including pilings and other surface and subsurface structures. (2) The placement, whether temporary or permanent, of rip -rap, or artificial berms of sand, or any other form of solid material on a beach, or in coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, or on shoreline protective works. (3) The replacement of twenty (20) percent or more of the materials of an existing structure with materials of a different kind. (4) The presence, whether temporary or permanent, of mechanized construction equipment or materials on any sand area or bluff or within twenty (20) feet of coastal waters or streams. b. The replacement of twenty (20) percent or more of a sea wall revetment, bluff retaining wall, breakwater, groin, or similar protective work under one ownership, unless destroyed by natural disaster. 4. The installation, testing, placement in service or the replacement of any necessary utility connection between an existing service facility and any development approved pursuant to the California Coastal City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 6 Draft Implementing Ordinance Act; provided that the Director may require reasonable conditions to mitigate any adverse impacts on coastal resources, including scenic resources. All repair, maintenance and utility hook-ups shall be consistent with the provisions adopted by the California Coastal Commission. 5. The replacement of any structure, other than a public works facility, destroyed by a disaster. The replacement structure shall conform to applicable existing zoning requirements; shall be for the same use as the destroyed structure, shall not exceed either the floor area, height or bulk of the destroyed structure by more than 10 percent; and, shall be sited in the same location on the affected property as the destroyed structure. 6. Maintenance dredging of existing navigation channels or moving dredged material from those channels to a disposal area outside the Coastal Zone, pursuant to a permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers. 7. Any category of development determined by the Coastal Commission to have no potential for any significant impact on the environment, coastal resources or public access to the coast. 8. Temporary/Special Event. a. Temporary/Special events shall be exempt from Coastal Development Permit requirements except those meeting any of the following criteria: 1. It is held between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day; and, 2. It occupies all or a portion of a sandy beach area; and, 3. In the opinion of the Community Development Director, the location, nature, configuration or length of the event, may result in impacts to coastal recreational opportunities and resources, access and impacts to the environment. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following are exempt: (1) If an admission fee is charged for entry to the event, the fee is for preferred seating only and more than 75% of the provided seating capacity is available free of charge for general public use; or, (2) The event is less than 24 hours in duration; or, (3) The event has previously received a Coastal Development Permit and will be held in the same location, at a similar season, and for the same duration, with operating and environmental conditions substantially the same as those associated with the previously approved event. c. The Director or the City Council may determine that a Temporary/Special event shall be subject to Coastal Development Permit review if unique or changing circumstances exist relative to a particular Temporary/Special event that have the potential for significant adverse impacts on coastal resources. Such circumstances may include the following: (1) The event, either individually or together with other temporary events scheduled before or after the particular event, precludes the general public from use of a public recreational area for a significant period of time; City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 7 Draft Implementing Ordinance (2) The event and its associated activities or access requirements will either directly or indirectly impact environmentally sensitive habitat areas, rare or endangered species, significant scenic resources, or other coastal resources; (3) The event is scheduled between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day and would restrict public use of roadways or parking areas or otherwise significantly impact public use or access to coastal waters; (4) The event has historically required a Coastal Development Permit to address and monitor associated impacts to coastal resources. d. In addition to any necessary Coastal Development Permits, Temporary/Special Events must obtain a Special Event Permit from the Department of Community Resources. B. Categorical Exclusions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the following projects: 1. All projects consistent with the zoning ordinance that do not require discretionary review and are not located in the appealable area or are subject to appeal as stated in Section 17.37.130. 2.(RESERVED); Specific listwof ca goncal exclusions to be submitted separately; unicipal improvement projects of control', devices suc access. raf is control signing andminorroadway`improvemcnts including: ulvcrt roplace riai Guardrails retaining walls;' Drainage course maintcnance'and cleaning involving les than 50 cubic yards of excavations; Parking meter mtallation and repair, inor Development •includin a. Sign permits in conformance withapplicable-provisions of this code. b. Temporary use permits in conformance with applicable provisions of this code.', orview corridors;=. City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 8 Fences and walls six (6)` fector les in height except when' such walls or"fences-wilt obstruct or the Coasta Installation of irrigation ;Ines Miscellaneous; Activities "Including: Coastal Development Permit. b nctions li61ed as mirn6teriai;in the California Environmental' (1) ' Iuancc ofbuildingpermits`' (2) l Issuance ofbuncss licenses;; (3) Approval of final subdivision maps, and including: 4i) )Approval of m611:0 uarutElity Service connections and disconncctionc. 77''� The City shall maintain a record of all permits issued for categorically excluded developments for public review. Each permit shall contain the name of applicant, location of project and a brief description of the project. Notice for projects that are categorically excluded shall be provided to the Coastal Commission within five (5) working days. 17.37.050 Coastal Development Permit Applications A. Application. Applications for a Coastal Development Permit shall be approved prior to issuance of building permits. A Coastal Development Permit application shall be made to the Community Development Department on forms provided by the same Department. The required contents of the Coastal Development Permit shall be as set forth by the Community Development Department and shall be accompanied by the filing fee as established by resolution of the City Council. The applicant shall state in the application how: 1. The proposed development conforms to the certified Local Coastal Program. 2. The proposed development, located between the nearest public road and the sea, is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3, Division 20 of the Public Resources Code. B. Refusal of Acceptance of Application for Lack of information. The Director may reject, without a public hearing, an application for a Coastal Development Permit if such application does not contain the required information. C. Concurrent Filing. A Coastal Development Permit shall be considered concurrently with any other discretionary permits or approvals required for the project by the City. 17.37.060 Determination of Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 9 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • A. Determination. Prior to or at the time of an application for a Coastal Development Permit, the Director shall determine if the proposed project is located within an area that is: 1. An area where the California Coastal Commission continues to exercise Original Permit Jurisdiction, as defined in Section 30519 of the California Coastal Act, and the applicant must obtain a Coastal Development Permit directly from the Coastal Commission. 2. Appealable to the Coastal Commission and requires a Coastal Development Permit. 3. Non -appealable to the Coastal Commission and requires a Coastal Development Permit. 4. Categorically excluded or exempt and does not require a Coastal Development Permit. 17.37.070 Resolving Jurisdictional Determination Disputes A. Dispute Procedure. Where a question as to the appropriate jurisdiction has arisen, the following procedures shall establish whether a development is exempt, categorically excluded, non -appealable or appealable: 1. The local government shall make its determination as to what type of development is being proposed (i.e. exempt, categorically excluded, appealable, non -appealable) and shall inform the applicant of the notice and hearing requirements for that particular development. 2. If the determination of the local government is challenged, or if the local government wishes to have the Commission determine the appropriate designation, the local government shall notify the Commission by telephone of the dispute/question and shall request an Executive Director's opinion. 3. The Executive Director shall, within two (2) working days of the local government request (or upon completion of a site inspection where such inspection is warranted), transmit his or her determination as to whether the development is exempt, categorically excluded, non -appealable or appealable. 4. Where, after the Executive Director's investigation, the Executive Director's determination is not in accordance with the local government's determination, the Coastal Commission shall hold a hearing for purposes of determining the appropriate designation for the area. The Coastal Commission shall schedule the hearing on the determination for the next Commission meeting (in the appropriate geographic region of the State) following the local government request. 17.37.080 Coastal Development Permit Notice Requirements A. Notice of Hearing. The Director shall provide notice of a hearing for a Coastal Development Permit by first class mail at least 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing to the following: 1. The applicant. 2. Property owners and occupants of commercial and residential property located within a 100 foot radius (not including publiceright of ways) of the perimeter of the parcel of real property ofarecord on which the developrnent is proposed; 3. The California Coastal Commission, public agencies that have an interest in the project, newspaper of general circulation. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 Draft Implementing Ordinance 10 • 1 4. Any person who has requested to be noticed of such permit. B. Contents of Coastal Development Permit Hearing Notice. In addition to the noticing required for public hearings in accordance with City Council policy, the notice for a Coastal Development Permit shall contain the following information: 1. A statement that the development is located within the Coastal Zone and is either Appealable or Non - Appealable to the Coastal Commission. 2. A statement of the public comment period. 3. The date of the filing of the application and the name of the applicant. 4. The file number assigned to the application. 5. A description of the development at its proposed location. 6. The date, time, and place at which the application will be heard. 7. A brief description of the general procedure concerning the conduct of hearing and local actions. 8. The procedure for local and Coastal Commission appeals, including any local fees required. 17.37.090 Coastal Development Permit Public Hearings A. Hearing. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review and consider an application for a Coastal Development Permit. B. Findings. All decisions on the Coastal Development Permit shall be accompanied by separate written findings, as specified in Section 17.37.100. C. Continuation of Action. A public hearing for a Coastal Development Permit may be continued without new public notice to another day if continued to a date certain. If the public hearing is continued to a date uncertain, notice of the continued public hearing shall be provided in accordance with Section, 17.37.080. 17.37.100 Coastal Development Permit Approval or Denial Findings A. Findings for Approval. An application for a Coastal Development Permit shall be approved when the evidence substantiates to the satisfaction of the approving authority the following findings: 1. The proposed development is in conformity with the Certified Local Coastal Program. 2. Any development, located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the Coastal Zone, is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of Division 20 of the Public Resources Code. 3. The proposed development conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). B. Findings for Denial. An application for a Coastal Development Permit shall be denied where the evidence fails to substantiate the basis for approval contained in Section 17.37.100 A. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 11 Draft Implementing Ordinance • 17.37.110 Conditions of Approval The City may impose conditions as necessary to ensure that the Coastal Development Permit conforms to the requirements of the Local Coastal Program. The landowner and applicant shall record with the Office, of the Los Angeles County Recorder an affidavit accepting and agreeing to implement all conditions of permit approval, and binding all successors to said conditions of approval, and, which shall run with the land. 17.37.120 Notice of Action and Appeal Rights A. Notice of Final Action. Within seven (7) -calendar days of alp final action on a Coastal Development Permit, the Director shall provide notice of such action by first class mail to the applicant, property owner, the Coastal Commission and to any person or agency who specifically requested notice of such decision by submitting a self-addressed stamped envelope to the Community Development Department. B. Contents of Notice of Action. The notice of action shall contain the following information: 1. Project description. 2. Written findings for approval and conditions of approval (if any). 3. Appeal procedure and appeal period as specified in Section 17.37.130. 17.37.130 Appeals A. Final Decision. A decision of the Planning Commission shall be considered the final decision of the City when all local appeal periods, specified -below, have been exhausted, and ti,;t e City Council has not initiated re sew a'` n no appeal has een fiiedT and fhc cf cct ve dates of pa peal periods have beery reached, Otherwise the City Council's decision shall' be considered a final decision of the City. B. Local Appeals 1. The City Council may initiate a review of the decision of the Planning Commission by any two votes of the City Council ats meeting next succeeding the Planning Commission action pursuant to Section 2.52.040. In the event the Council initiates such a review, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its review hearing and takes final action on the Coastal Development Permit. 2. Within ten (10) days following the Council meeting that succeeds the Planning Commission action, an appeal in writing may be filed with the City Council by any person dissatisfied with the decision of the Planning Commission. The filing of such appeal within such time shall stay the effective date of the order of the Planning Commission until such time as the City Council has acted on the appeal. 3 Within forty (40) days of a review initiated by Council, or an appeal filed by a dissatisfied person, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing, which shall be noticed as required by Section 17.68.050. 4. The decision of the City Council, supported by findings as set forth in Section 17.37.100, shall be set forth in full in a resolution. ,5. Within seven (7) calendar days of ninaC action ,bj Development Permit, the Director shall provide notice ounciil on an appeal of a Coastal such ac ion;: o any :person ;or age c2 ressed stamped envelo, Otice,Ofsuch decision,_ eve Ment Depa mment City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 12 • 40 5. Within seven (7) calendar days'of awn e tion •nfii ppeal�a CC ao stal Develop Ment Permit," C. Appeals to the Coastal Commission 1. Exhaustion of Local Appeals. An appellant must exhaust all local appeals under the City's appeal procedure prior to filing an appeal to the Coastal Commission. 2. Non Appealable Jurisdiction: A decision for a development located in the non -appealable jurisdiction is not appealable unless the development: a. Requires amendment to the Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. b. Constitutes a major public works project or a major energy facility. 3. Appellants: A decision for a development located in the appealable jurisdiction or as described in 17.30.130 C2 above may be appealed by: a. The applicant or aggrieved person who exhausted local appeals. b. Any two members of the Coastal Commission. 4. Appeal Time Limit: All appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days of the date of final local action on the Coastal Development Permit as defined in Section: 13571(x), Title 14, ofthe CaliforniasCode of Regulations= 5.. ''Grounds for Appeal. The grounds for an appeal of a local decision on a development shall be limited to an allegation that the decision did not conform to the Certified Local Coastal Program or 'the—0-66k 'aa'c'es:p-oliclems7cirtheZ6a-sTai Acts 6. Effect of Appeal to the Coastal Commission. Upon receipt of a notice from the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission that an appeal has been filed the City shall refrain from issuing a building permit on the development, andTheuCity's on,t action he velopment shall -be stayed, pending Coastal Commission action on theµ appeal. .M..de 17.37.140 Expiration of Unused Permits A. Permit Expiration. If development authorized by a Coastal Development Permit has not commenced within the specified time, or if no time is specified, within two years of the granting of the permit, the permit becomes null and void with the exception of the following: 1. In the case of a permit fora publicly owned use the development shall be deemed, to have commenced, no timc limit shall apply to,utilization of,such permit provided that the public agency accomplished the following: a. Within one year of the approval date, the City either acquires the property involved or commences legal proceedings for its acquisition. b. Immediately after the acquisition of,.or the commencement of legal proceedings for the acquisition of the property, posts such property with signs, having an area of not less than 20 square feet nor more than 40 square feet in area indicating the agency and the purpose of which it is to be developed. One such sign shall be placed facing and located within 5 feet of each street, highway or parkway bordering the property. Where the property in question is not bounded by a street, highway or parkway, the agency shall erect one sign facing the street, highway or parkway nearest the property. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 13 Draft Implementing Ordinance • 2. In the case of a Coastal Development Permit heard concurrently with any other discretionary permit, the Planning Commission and/or City Council shall specify time limits and extensions to be concurrent and consistent with those of the land division, variance or other permit. 3. Extension of Permit. The Planning Commission may extend a permit for a period of not to exceed one year, provided an application requesting such extension is filed prior to such expiration date. In the case of a non-profit corporation organized to provide low-income housing, the Planning Commission may grant an additional one-year extension, provided that an application requesting such extension is filed prior to the expiration of the first such extension. B. Expiration Following Cessation of Use. A Coastal Development Permit granted by action of the Planning Commission or City Council shall automatically cease to be of any force and effect if the use for which such Coastal Development Permit was granted has ceased or has been suspended for a consecutive period of two or more years. 17.37.150 Amendments to Coastal Development Permits A. Amendment Procedure. An amendment shall be accomplished in the same manner specified for initial approval of the Coastal Development Permit. All sections of this Chapter shall apply to permit amendments. B. Application for Amendments. An amendment may be made to a Coastal Development Permit previously approved by the City by filing a written application with the Director. Such application shall contain a description of the proposed amendment, the reason for the amendment, together with maps, drawings or other material appropriate to the request. A filing fee, as required by Resolution of City Council, shall accompany a request for an amendment. C. Rejection of Application for Amendment. An application for an amendment shall be rejected if it would Jessenorµvoid the'effectAof + +se the original permit unless the applicant presents newly discovered material information which could not, with reasonable diligence, have been discovered and produced before the permit was granted. D. Action on Amendments. For those Coastal Development Permit Amendment applications accepted, the Director shall determine whether the proposed amendment represents an immaterial or material change to the permit. 1. For amendment applications representing immaterial changes, the Director shall prepare and send a written notice as required by Section 17.37.120, including a statement informing persons of the opportunity to submit written objections to the Director within 10 days of the date the notices were mailed to persons within a 300 foot radius. The Director shall also mail notices to all persons who testified at a public hearing on the permit and who submitted written testimony on the permit and such other persons as the Director has reason to know may be interested in the application. If the Director receives no written objections within 10 days of mailing, the Director's determination shall be conclusive and the proposed amendment approved. 2. For amendment applications representing material changes, objections to determinations of immateriality, or amendments to conditions affecting coastal resource protection or coastal access, a Coastal Development Permit Amendment is required per 17.37.150. A. The Director shall mail notices in accordance with Section 17.37.080, and to all persons who testified at the public hearing on the permit, submitted written testimony on the permit, objected to the Director's determination of City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 14 Draft Implementing Ordinance immateriality, or such persons as the Director has reason to know may be interested in the application. 3. The appropriate reviewing body shall review material changes and determine whether the proposed development and amendment are consistent with the California Coastal Act and the Certified Local Coastal Program. 17.37.160 Reapplication A. Reapplication Limit. No application for a Coastal Development Permit that has been previously denied shall be filed earlier than one (1) year after the date such denial becomes effective, unless the request for reapplication reflects a major change in circumstances and specific permission has been granted by the Approving Authority. 17.37.170 Revocation of Coastal Development Permits A. Grounds for Revocation. The City may initiate proceedings to revoke a Coastal Development Permit upon the receipt of evidence indicating that: 1. The applicant included inaccurate, erroneous and/or incomplete information, and if accurate and complete information had been provided, the Coastal Development Permit would not have been approved or different conditions of approval would have been imposed; or, 2 There:was failure to comply'with notice provisions of Section 17 37 080, where the views of the persons) not; notified werenot otherwise madeknown to the:City and, could have caused the City to' require;additional or different conditions�on a permitor deny an application 3. The applicant is violating the conditions of approval, has been requested by' the City to correct said violation, and has failed to correct a violation despite this request by the City. 4. The development is being operated in such a manner as to be a,threat to public health and safety or is creating a nuisance. B. Initiation of Revocation. The City may initiate proceedings to revoke a permit based on evidence submitted by any person constituting grounds for revocation as stated in sub section A above `bccausc of the reasons stated in Subsection A. The Director shall review the -stated grou ds. a �., ation and, unless the request is patently frivolous or Was filed without due diligence and 's without men , shall initiate revocation proceedings. ..,µ� • C. Temporary Suspension. Where the Director determines that grounds exist for revocation of a Coastal Development Permit, the operation of the permit shall be reviewed and be automatically suspended if it is a threat to public health and safety. The Director shall advise the applicant in writing that any development undertaken during suspension of the permit may be in violation of the California Coastal Act. D. Procedure for Revocation. The Director shall notify the permittee by mailing a copy of the request for revocation and a summary of the procedures contained in this section to the address shown in the permit application. The Planning Commission may, after a public hearing noticed and held in the manner prescribed in Sections 17.37.080 and 17.37.090, revoke or modify the permit. 17.37.180 Enforcement In addition to the enforcement provisions contained in this ordinance, the provisions of the California Coastal Act contained in Chapter 9 of Division 20 of the Public Resources Code shall also apply with respect to violations and enforcement. City of Hermosa Beach Draft Implementing Ordinance 5/9/00 15 • 17.37.190 Emergency Coastal Development Permits A. Emergency Permits. In the event of a verified emergency, a temporary emergency authorization to proceed with remedial measures may be given by the Director until such time as a full Coastal Development Permit application has been be filed, as set forth in Sections 13136 through 13143, Title 14, of the California Code of Regulations. The application to be reported at the time of emergency or within three (3) working days after the emergency shall include the following: 1. Nature of the emergency. 2. Cause of the emergency, insofar as this can be established. 3. Location of the emergency. 4. The remedial, protective, or preventive work required to deal with the emergency. 5. The circumstances during the emergency that appeared to justify the cause(s) of action taken, including the probable consequences of filing to take action. B. immediate Emergency Action. In some instances it may be necessary to take immediate action to protect life and public property from imminent danger, or to restore, repair, or maintain public works, utilities, or services destroyed, damaged, orinterrupted by natural disaster, serious accident, or other emergency, before applications and procedures for obtaining a permit can be complied with in a timely manner. In such cases the requirements of obtaining a permit may be waived. The Executive Director of the Coastal Commission shall be notified of the type and location of the emergency action taken within three (3) days of the disaster or discovery of the danger, whichever occurs first. Within seven (7) days of taking such action, the Director shall send a written statement to the Coastal Commission of the reasons why the action was taken and verify that the action complied with the expenditure limits set forth in Public Resources Code Section 3061. C. -Limitations. The Director shall not grant an Emergency Coastal Development Permit for any development that falls within an area in which the Coastal Commission retains direct permit review authority. In such areas, a request for an emergency authorization must be made to the Coastal Commission. D. Public Noticing. The Director shall provide public notice of the proposed emergency action. The extent and type of the notice shall be determined on the basis of the nature of the emergency. If the nature of the emergency does not allow sufficient time for public notice to be given before the emergency work begins, the Director shall provide public notice of the action taken, or being taken, as soon as is practical. Public notice of the nature of the emergency and the remedial actions to be taken shall be posted on the site in a conspicuous place, mailed to all persons the Director has reason to know would be interested in such action and to the Coastal Commission. E. Findings and Conditions. The Director may grant an Emergency Coastal Development Rermit if it is found that: 1. An emergency exists that requires action more quickly than permitted by the procedures for a Coastal Development Permit and the work can and will be completed within thirty (30) days unless otherwise specified by the terms of the permit. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 16 Draft Implementing Ordinance 2 . Public comment on the proposed emergency action has been reviewed, if time allows. 3. The work proposed is consistent with the requirements of the Certified Local Coastal Program. F. Expiration of Emergency Permit. An Emergency Coastal Development Permit shall be valid for sixty (60) days from the date of issuance by the Director. Prior to expiration of the emergency permit, the permittee must submit a regular Coastal Development Permit application for the development even if only to remove the development undertaken pursuant to the emergency permit and restore the site to its previous condition. G. Report to City Council and Coastal Commission. The Director shall report the granting of an emergency permit to the City Council at its next scheduled meeting. The report shall include a description of the nature of the emergency, the development involved and the person or entity undertaking the development. Copies of the report shall be available at the meeting and shall be mailed to the Coastal Commission and to all persons requesting such notification of local coastal development decisions. 17.37.200 Continuing Validity of Permit A Coastal Development Permit that is valid and in effect, and was granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall adhere to the land and continue to be valid upon change of ownership of the land or any existing building or structure on said land. 17.37.210 Local Coastal Program Amendments The City Council may amend all or part of the Local Coastal Program, but the amendment will not take effect until it has been certified by the Commission. Any General Plan Element or Specific Plan or ordinance of the City that is applicable to the Coastal Zone must be reviewed and amended as necessary to make the General Plan Element or Specific Plan or ordinance consistent with the rest of the Local Coastal Program. A. Initiation of Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. An amendment to the Local Coastal Program may be initiated by one of the following: 1 A resolution of intention initiated by the Planning Commission. 2. A resolution of intention initiated by the City Council directing the Planning Commission to initiate an amendment. 3. An application from a property owner or his/her authorized agent provided that such application involves the development or modification of property located within the area affected by such amendment. B. Planning Commission Action on Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. 1. Upon receipt of a completed amendment application or duly adopted resolution of intention, a public hearing before the Planning Commission must be held and notice of such hearing given consistent with the Coastal Act and California Code of Regulations. 2. The Planning Commission must make a written recommendation on the proposed amendment whether to approve, approve in modified form, or disapprove. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 17 Draft Implementing Ordinance • 3. Planning Commission action recommending that the proposed Local Coastal Program amendment be approved, or approved in modified form, must be considered for adoption by the City Council. Planning Commission action disapproving a proposed Local Coastal Program amendment may be appealed by any interested person, including a Commissioner or Council member, per Section 17.37.130. C. City Council Action on Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. The recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve or deny a proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment, or the appeal from a decision by the Planning Commission shall be considered by the City Council. A public hearing on the amendment shall be conducted after first giving notice of the hearing pursuant to Section 17.37.080. D. Fees. A fee for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program shall be established by a resolution of the City Council. E. Coastal Commission Certification of Amendments to the Local Coastal Program. Any proposed Amendment to the Local Coastal Program shall not take effect until it has been certified by the Coastal Commission. Any amendment approved by the City shall be submitted to the Coastal Commission in accordance with Sections 30512 and 30513 of the Public Resources Code. An amendment to the certified Local Coastal Plan shall not become effective until the amendment is submitted pursuant to the requirements of Section 13551 of the California Code of Regulations and certified by the California Coastal Commission pursuant to Chapter 6, Article 2 of the California Coastal Act. 17.37.220 Encroachments An encroachment is defined as any structure, object, use or landscaping owned by a private property owner that is proposed to be located on or over public property. A. Encroachment Permits. 1. All encroachments shall be required to obtain an Encroachment Permit, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 12.16, as well as any necessary Coastal Development Permits, as detailed in this section. 2. Any application for encroachment in the Coastal Zone shall be evaluated for conformance with the policies of the California Coastal Act and the Certified Land Use Plan. 3. Access in the Coastal Zone along public rights-of-way, such as paved sidewalks and walk streets, shall be protected. No permanent device, structure, use, object or landscaping preventing public access along paved sidewalks shall be permitted. B. Outdoor Dining on Lower Pier Avenue. 1. Applications for outdoor dining on Pier Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and the Strand shall be subject to Section 12.16, Encroachments, of the Municipal Code. 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of 17.37.220, A. above, applications for outdoor dining on Pier Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and the Strand shall not require a Coastal Development Permit as long as the provisions of Municipal Code section 12.16 are complied with. 17.37.230 Downtown Implementation Plan City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 18 Draft Implementing Ordinance t The recommendations of the Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan, October 1994, regarding the revitalization of the Downtown area shall be utilized as guidelines in the design and improvement of streetscape and roadway improvements along portions of Hermosa Avenue (8th Street to 15th Street) and Pier Avenue (The Strand to the Greenbelt). 17.37.240 Water Quality In order to reduce urban runoff and its potential impacts to the Coastal Zone, the City of Hermosa Beach has adopted Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 8.44. The requirements and standards of this section shall be applicable in the Coastal Zone. 17.37.250 Temporary/Special Events Calendar The City of Hermosa Beach City Council shall adopt an annual calendar of major Temporary/Special Events on or before of every year. City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 19 Draft Implementing Ordinance • • The recommendations of the Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan, 9to eb 994, regarding the revitaliFation of the Downtown area shall be utilized as guidelines in th ,•d gn and improvement of streetscape and roadway improvements along portions of Hermosa Avenue (8th Street to 15th Street) and Pier Avenue (The Strand to the Greenbelt). 17.37.240 W,ateYQuality In order to reduce urban runoff and its potenti pacts to the Coastal Zone, the City of Hermosa Beach has adopted Stormwater and Urban Runp,ff, ollution Control Regulations, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 8.44. The requirements and standards of this section shall be applicable in the Coastal Zone. 17.37.250 Temporary/Sp- ial Events Calendar The City of Hermosa Beh City Council shall; adopt an annual calendar of major Temporary/Special Events on or before arch 31tiof everyyear City of Hermosa Beach 5/9/00 19 Draft Implementing Ordinance Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 2, 2000 Regular Meeting of May 9, 2000 PROJECT NO. CIP 99-144 RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STRAND'IKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET — APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the plans, specifications, estimates, order the work and call for bids; and 2. Instruct the City Clerk to post a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said project. Background: The 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Project Budget included a project for the reconstruction of the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Walkway between 24th Street and 35th Street. On May 25, 1999, Council approved an agreement between the city and AAE, Inc., for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the project. AAE, Inc. has completed the work. The work to be performed consists of the replacement of deteriorated pavement, walls, lighting and trash receptacles on the Strand between 24th Street and 35th Street. The PS&E's are available in the office of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer for review. Fiscal Impact: The engineer's estimate for construction is $499,785. Attachment: Project Location Map 1 • Respectfully submitted, /.--/Cured 'arold C. Williams, P.E. Stephe Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Manager Concur: Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director • PROJECT LOCATION MAP NTS