Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/28/00
i 00-- c a 5X1., 14. yrA""yj ie�` "Time Flies; but remember, you are the navigator." AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, March 28, 2000 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Julie Oakes Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER J. K Reviczky John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER John Bowler Stephen K Burrell Kathy Dunbabin CITY ATTORNEY Sam Y. Edgerton Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS CENSUS 2000 - APRIL 1, 2000 PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF MARCH 14, 2000: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS 1 • • PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Roger Bacon requesting that the City Council extend the banner program near First Street and Pacific Coast Highway through the remainder of this year with the proceeds to be used for revitalization, landscaping, sidewalk and signage improvements on Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation Boulevard. (Continued from meeting of March 14, 2000) RECOMMENDATION: Consider request. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on February 29, 2000. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. 2 • • (d) Recommendation to receive and file memorandum regarding the February 2000 financial reports. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 23, 2000. (e) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of March 21, 2000. (f) Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated March 22, 2000. (g) Claimant: Guirges, Raef S. Date of Loss: 03/07/00 Date Filed: 03/14/00 Recommendation to approve purchase of forty (40) electronic parking meters for Downtown Parking Lot B and appropriate $7,575 from the Parking Fund for the purchase. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated March 22, 2000. (h) Recommendation to approve request from the Jazz Alumni Club members to use the Plaza on Thursdays from 5:OOpm - 9:OOpm instead of Wednesdays from 4:OOpm to 8:OOpm for jazz concerts (various storefronts) beginning in May and waive the insurance requirement for this activity. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 20, 2000. Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 7.2000. Recommendation to accept the work by Sully -Miller Contracting Company on CIP No. 98-143 Street Improvements, authorize final payment to the contractor, and authorize a budget transfer of $40,640.48. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the application for Block Grant Funds from the State of California Integrated Waste Management Board Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Program. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated March 16, 2000. (1) Recommendation to award construction contract for the sewer construction and rehabilitation on Pacific Coast Highway between Gould Avenue and 24th Street to IT -Liner West of Long Beach, California in the amount of $28,250. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated March 22, 2000. 3 (m) Recommendation to receive and file report on the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Housing Needs Assessment Allocation. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 20, 2000. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM'1'HE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVENUE, ZEPPY'S PIZZA, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 8,9 AND IV 10, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT. RECOMMENDATION: Sustain the Planning Commission's decision to deny the request for beer and wine. MUNICIPAL MA'r1'ERS 5. 2000 COMMERCIAL EVENT APPLICATIONS. RECOMMENDATION: Approve slate of special events as listed below and approve event contracts: EVENT DATE FEES (estimated) Beach Bash 2000 - IMG June 8-11 $36,806.00 So. Calif. Rugby Football - Makai Events July 29-30 $7,250.00 9th Annual Hermosa Beach Triathlon - MESP October 8 $8,068.00 6. HERMOSA BEACH STOP OIL II. Memorandum from City Attorney Michael Jenkins dated March 22, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 4 • • 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS CITY MANAGER a. LOS ANGELES COUNTY'S RETAIL FOOD INSPECTION PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 23, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Consider whether or not it wishes to adopt the County ordinance for the restaurant grading system. b. ADDITIONAL REVENUE FOR STREET REPAIR. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 22, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a letter to the Governor, Senate and Assembly members request an allocation for city streets and roads. c. MUNICIPAL WATER CONSUMERS ALLIANCE FOR REFORM OF WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 22, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider becoming a member of the Alliance (no cost membership). d. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS IN REDONDO BEACH - AES/HARBOR PROJECT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 21, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to send letter requesting to be included in the upcoming events. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL NONE ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on March 14, 2000. 5 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Professional and Administrative Employee Group Hermosa Beach Management Association Hermosa Beach Police Management Association 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Macpherson v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: BC172546 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 1' /— 121 -IS Sl;OPlit1 MARCH 3, 2000 MR. STEVEN R. BURRELL CITY MANAGER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 • C W D - 6 2000 CIP MANAGE OFFICE RE: EXTENDING THE BANNER PROGRAM NEAR FIRST STREET & PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HERMOSA BEACH Dear Steve: Regarding our phone conversation this week, please place the above matter on the City Council Agenda for the March 14, 2000 City Council Meeting. Many of my business associates on Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation Boulevard believe said Streets need revitalization, landscaping, sidewalk and signage improvements, therefore I would like to extend our Banner Program through the remainder of this year to use the Banner Funds for the afore said improvements. I already have three corporations pledged for $2,500.00 a piece for one months' Banner Display. Sincerely, Ralph's • Starbuck's • Bank of America (Kiosk) • Union Bank • McDonald's First Federal Bank • El Polio Inka • Allstate • Fox Photo 1100 Pacific Coast Highway • Hermosa Beach • California 90254 • (310) 374-8991 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 282 • Redondo Beach • California 90277 '..S1 -LOLL -L1" • CLN�'1,1::1. MARCH 3, 2000 MR. STEVEN R. BURRELL CITY.; MANAGER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE' HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 • EXTENDING THE BANNER PROGRAM NEAR FIRST STREET & PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HERMOSA BEACH' 3/07Y ,Dear Steve: ;.Regarding our phone conversation this week, please place the above matter on Ahe.City Council Agenda for the March 14, 2000 City Council Meeting.. ':Many of my business. associates on Pacific Coast Highway. and Aviation Boulevard`. believe -said Streets need revitalization, landscaping, sidewalk'and.signage `:.improvements, therefore I would like to extend our Banner Program through the remainder of this year to use the Banner Funds for the afore said improvements.' I already have three corporations pledged for $2,500.00 a piece for one months; ,;:Banner Display. f Sincerely, 'WE THE.BUSINESS PEOPLE ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND AVIATION BLVD. IN ;. HERMQSA-BEACH COMPLETELY APPROVE THE ABOVE BANNER PROGRAM.. NAMEVASEK POLAK BMW ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER G' . �''�-tom, ,� � �� � �:.-- sib - 7.r.)7) PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY .HERMOSA O ACH, CA .90254 Sr rwi -S PREM UM—.CARc 802 Pacific Coast Hwy. + u .3 7 5 Pf 7 - Hermosa & ., CA 9( 54 '/. i. ), .l%`X%tr(7.�� l 3/O 72g92 Ralph's • Starbuck's Bank of America (Kiosk) • Union Dank V McDonald's First Federal Danko El Polio lnka • Allstate Y Fox Photo 1100 Pacific Coast Highway 0 Hermosa Beach 0 California 90254 a (310) 374-8991 :v:.4 ci, LUUU T, 1J::vl ;dal _ __ 4110 GaTAb SOLI BAY BROKERS INCORPO ATGD Kevin M. Neion Reoltat Homes & Investment Properties 3-9-00 Roger Bacon Ralphs Shopping Center Re: Banner Dear Mr. Bacon: I would like to place a reservation for the banner at P.L.H. and I Street in Hermosa Beach. I understand it is for a 30 -day period at a fee of $ 2,500,00, which is to be paid at time of confirmation of schedule. I'll provide the banner of 4'x 40' which I will contract Fast Signs in Torrance to create. Your installation is included in the $ 2,500.00 fee. This banner will highlight my consumer information website, RealEstateSaver.com. If a portion of the fee can be used for some community effort such as the Surf Walk of Fame or the Marine studies at Mira Costa, that would be great. Obviously I would like to get the earliest 30 -day period available, hopefully April. Please let me know of the timing so that I have enough lead time with Fast Signs. I can be reached at 310-993-7823(Cel1) or 310-546-7622 ext. 307 (Office). Kevin M. Nolan RealEstateSaver.com 2501 North Sepulveda Boulevard, Second Floor / Menhasten Beech, California 90266 / Telephone (310) 546-7611 March], 2000 Roger E. Bacon P.O. Box 282 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Dear Roger, I am contacting you from Dive N' Surf in Redondo Beach and would like to reserve the street banner for the months of August 2000 and February 2001. If you have any questions please contact me at 310-937-2847. Thank you. Sincerely; Ronnie Meistrel! Vice President Dive N' Surf, Inc. 504 NORTH BROADWAY • REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277-0511 • (310) 372-8423 • FAX (310) 372-0937 Mar 03 00 01:55p ROLAND e4 ASSOC.810-50S-3080 p.l • $9/ �,��� s �"s:riin.'S': Ca Y2 RCHANO & AsiawiLS PURtIC RELATIONS 12023 4 VEIJ"Un48OULEV RD. SUITE 1, STUDIO CITY. CA 91604 818 5O9 3080 rAX 8'8 509 3085 March 3, 2000 Mr. Roger Bacon P.O. Box 282 Redondo Beach. CA 90277 Dear Roger: In Regards to our conversation we would like to formally request reservation of banner space an Pacific Coast Highway and 190th Street in Hermosa Beach from September 1Sth through October 15Lh. The banner will be for the Redondo Beach Lobster Festival taking place October 13t", 14th, and 15th at the Seaside Lagoon. We understand the total cost of the space is $2,500. We are responsible for producing the banner and it can be Oft x Oft long. We further understand that the city will be responsible for lunging the banner. Please call us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Annet Peairs cc: JoAnn Turk, Redondo Beach Marina • ri • ROLAND & ASSOCIATES PUBLIC RELATIONS 12023% VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1, STUDIO CITY, CA 91604 818 509 3080 FAX 818 509 3085 February 24, 2000 Mr. Roger Bacon P.O. Box 282 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Dear Roger: We would like to reserve banner space on Pacific Coast Highway and 190th Street in Hermosa Beach approximately from September 15th through October 15th The banner is for the Redondo Beach Lobster Festival taking place on October 13th, 14th and 15th at the Seaside Lagoon. Please let us know what we need to do to hold the space. Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Annet Peairs cc: JoAnn Turk, Redondo Beach Marina MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, February 29, 2000, at the hour of 7:20 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Betty Ryan ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Dunbabin, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Oakes announced that the next Friends of the Library Book Sale would take place Saturday, March 25, 2000 from 9 A.M. to 1 P.M. at its usual location in front of the Library and also on the west side of Bard Street next to the antique store, due to the current renovation of the Library and the group's storage of books and tables in a City warehouse on Bard Street. Councilmember Edgerton announced the Hermosa Beach Little League opening ceremonies at Clark Field at 6:15 P.M. on Friday, March 3, 2000, noting that Mayor Oakes would throw out the first pitch at 7 P.M. Councilmember Dunbabin announced a Project Touch fundraiser Sunday, March 12, 2000, at the Jackson Village Bistro, with brunch from 9:30 A.M. to 2:30 P.M. and special raffles between 11 A.M. and 2 P.M. Councilmember Bowler announced that he would have to leave the meeting at 9 P.M. in order to catch the last flight to San Francisco to attend a conference. 1. CONSIDERATION OF TEXT AMENDMENTS TO SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY PROJECTS AND EXPANSIONS TO NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS; OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS IN R-2, R -2B, AND R-3 ZONES; ELIMINATION OF NUMBER OF STORIES REQUIREMENT IN R-1, R -1A, R-2, AND R -2B ZONES; LOT COVERAGE DEFINITION; AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 22, 2000. Supplemental information from the Community Development Department received February 29, 2000. Supplemental letter from Nancy Schwappach dated February 29, 2000. Mayor Oakes said this workshop meeting was scheduled for the sole purpose of discussing proposed amendments to the City's residential development standards. Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky said the Council was looking at the standards because people continually come forward to object to individual projects with concerns about issues such as parking, bulk, open space and setbacks. City Council Minutes 02-29-99 Page 10195 a It was the consensus of the Council to handle the issues separately. It was noted that any changes approved this evening would have to come back for final action. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions on the proposed elimination of the single family guest parking requirement, noting that the parking requirements were based on use (single family) rather than zone (R-1). Coming forward to address the Council on this issue were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Boulevard, said to save time, the Council should let people speak once rather than on each issue; Roger Creighton - 1070 Third Street, questioned what effect the change would have on the 25 -foot wide, 2200 -square -foot lots that dominate the area and if the 17 -foot required setback would be reduced to 9 feet (Mayor Oakes said the 17 - foot garage setback was not in question, and the 9 -foot setback applied only to alleys); Betty Ryan - 588 - 20th Street, spoke against the proposed change; said parking was a problem in the majority of residential areas; Paul Brennan - 309 26th Street, said he had a single family home in an R-2 zone with a street to alley lot and expressed concern about the proposed change (Councilmember Reviczky said the standards would not affect existing structures, only new structures or remodels greater than 50 percent); George Shweiri - 304 Manhattan Avenue, said he had a single family home in an R-3 zone; thought the proposed change should be considered due to the less restrictive standards that currently exist for the surrounding multi -family structures; Edith Pfeifer - 843 Loma Drive, spoke against the proposed change; said there were usually a lot of drivers in single family homes, i.e. parents and their children when they reach driving age; Mike Watson - 661 25th Street, said it was ironic that the Council was considering taking parking away from single family and adding it to multi family; cited parking problems near the beach and said standards should be consistent; said small lots could be granted variances; Pete Tucker - 235 34th Street, said the 17 -foot setback was meant to eliminate or mitigate the parking problems; suggested that the Council also keep the alley setback at nine feet; Troy Pliska - 1348 Palm Drive, asked if all items would be voted on at the same time, as his opinion on some issues would depend on the outcome of others (Mayor Oakes said this item affected only single family parking, and that City Council Minutes 02-29-99 Page 10196 • multi -family issues would be discussed together); Nancy Schwappach - 3124 Hermosa Avenue, supported the proposed change; said her lot was on a narrow alley in the Shakespeare tract and must meet the minimum turning radius; supported reducing single family parking in R-3 zones; Jill Hewes - 126 Monterey Boulevard, spoke in favor of the change; said she had a small home in an R-3 zone with a single -car garage and a parking space in the 17 -foot setback; said she would need additional parking in order to remodel; Park Lee - 1250 Eighth Street, spoke in favor of the change; said he had a one -car garage and one space in the driveway; said he could not add to his house because of the additional parking currently required; and Jo Hollingsworth - 607 Gould Terrace, opposed reducing the guest parking requirement because parking was such a premium in the City. Action: To maintain the existing single family parking standards rather than lessen them as proposed. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions on the proposal to eliminate the limitation on the number of stories in all residential zones, keeping only the height limit standard. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Boulevard, said this was a public hearing,and the Council should not consider continuing any portion of it and should stop wasting time; and Bill Lyle - 715 First Street, expressed concern about neighboring construction (City Manager Burrell said the height limit was measured before the start of construction; Mayor Oakes suggested Mr. Lyle meet with staff). Action: To eliminate the story limitation from the Zoning Code and maintain only the height limit standard. Motion Mayor Oakes, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff reports and responded to Council questions on the following proposals relating to multi -family projects: increasing guest parking; no longer allowing roof decks to count towards open space requirements; requiring greater front and rear setbacks on upper floors; and City Council Minutes 02-29-99 Page 10197 requiring 200 square feet of open space per unit to be on the ground open•to the sky. Action: By consensus, the Council expressed no interest in the proposal to require greater front and rear setbacks on the upper floors in multi -family zones. Before leaving the. meeting at 9 P.M., Councilmember Bowler expressed his interest in increasing the multi -family parking requirements, but said he had no interest in changing standards on the issues pertaining to roof deck open space and open space on the ground. Coming forward to address the Council on the issues of multi- family guest parking, roof deck open space, and open space on the ground were: Jerry Compton - architect, 1200 Artesia Boulevard #300, did not oppose increasing the guest parking to one space per condominium unit, noting he tries when possible to provide two per unit, but expressed concern about adding displaced parking spaces as well, because in many areas, such as walk streets, the parking could not be provided without going tandem; Roger Creighton - 1070 Third Street, suggested increasing the parking requirements but allowing exemptions in certain areas of the city; said a big problem in town was the use of garages for purposes other than parking; George Shweir - 304 Manhattan Avenue, said he had a home on a half lot in the R-3 zone; compared the small lot sizes in Hermosa Beach to the larger lots in other cities; suggested making open space a percentage of the lot size (Councilmember Reviczky said the City already had a small lot exemption at 2100 square feet); Mike Watson - 661 25th Street, said most of the City's parking problems were caused by the older rentals rather than new condominiums; was opposed to a parking increase for condominiums; Gary Skardina - 625 30th Street, said he bought his property in 1987 and was planning to develop it soon; expressed concern about the issues of open space, roof decks and additional setbacks on upper floors; wanted the rules to maintain a level playing field; Rob Seaman - 1120 Loma Drive, said parking was the hardest component of planning his condominium project; cited problems with turning radius, setback and raised grade requirements; said increasing guest spaces would make many sites single family lots; suggested if parking is increased that other restrictions be lessened; Charlie Cheatum - 548 Seventh Street, supported adopting increased parking standards; said City Council Minutes 02-29-99 Page 10198 there was a need in the City for more greenery in front of structures and suggested requiring increased open space on the ground in front to eliminate the concrete jungle look; Bernie Talmas - 1649 Monterey Boulevard, was opposed to all of the changes being considered; said he lived in an older structure built in the 1930s, and the changes would prohibit him from changing or upgrading his building because he could not meet the parking requirements for his two units; said his ocean view is now blocked by new boxy structures but he could not meet the requirements to add a second story; Bruce Robles - 2138 Loma Drive, objected to the new boxy single-family homes being built, citing one across the street from himthatlooked like a loaf of bread; said most of the nonconforming R-2 structures on his block provide ample parking, while people in single-family homes use their garages for storage rather than for parking their cars; objected to increasing multi -family parking; Lee Grant - 1011 16th Street, said he had a small R-1 lot with two tall homes on the lot behind him; said more open space was needed to avoid the appearance of a concrete jungle; said more open space meant greater value; Edith Pfeifer - 843 Loma Drive, said she had a 1920s beach bungalow that would be her children's inheritance; expressed concern about a decrease in property value with the proposed changes; Jo Hollingsworth - 607 Gould Terrace, said buildings with more open space would increase ambience and would eventually increase property values; supported increasing guest parking; Pete Tucker - 235 34th Street, asked if upper floor setbacks would be needed to accomplish some of the remaining proposed changes; Nancy Schwappach - 3124 Hermosa Avenue; objected to using a 15 -percent figure for roof decks because a usable deck would have to be much larger; Jerry Compton - architect, 1200 Artesia Boulevard #300, said Hermosa was known for roof decks; said 65 -percent lot coverage was very tight; thought 15 -percent for a roof deck was too strict and suggested that 40 to 50 percent might be more reasonable; Jonathan Schwartz - 259 31st Street, said he had a 30 -by -70 -foot lot on a walk street and could not count his front yard as open space; said he had a 400 square foot roof deck that was well used and did not know how he would otherwise meet the open space requirement; City Council Minutes 02-29-99 Page 10199 David Olin - 1243 Palm Drive, said everyone wants a roof deck; said Manhattan Beach had consistent lot sizes while Hermosa's lot sizes varied; did not oppose increasing the guest parking but suggested keeping the existing roof deck requirement, or making it at least 50 percent or 65 percent if it is changed; Name indistinct - 1144 Cypress, said the proposed changes would eliminate the ability to build three units in the City, that Council would eliminate that, whole market if the proposed open space requirements are adopted. Unidentified speaker - said he bought his property solely for future development, and the price was based on current requirements; said changes could destroy the value of his property and he was against anything that would diminish the value of his property; George Brown - 2006 Hillcrest Drive, said reducing the bulk and mass of buildings and increasing open space would actually enhance property values; and Sandy Fister - 903 Eighth Street, said change was good but everyone did not want a single family home with a lawn to mow; asked the Council to keep the quality of life. Proposed Action: To require the greater of either three parking spaces per condominium unit or the existing two and one-half spaces plus the replacement of displaced on - street parking spaces, Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion was subsequently restated in the following motion. Proposed Action: To require three parking spaces per condominium unit (two spaces plus one guest space). Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Dunbabin and Mayor Oakes and the absence of Bowler. Proposed Action: condominium unit per project. Motion Edgerton. To require three parking spaces per and no more than two replacement spaces The motion died for lack of a second. City Manager Burrell suggested continuing the public hearing to a date certain, again as a separate meeting, and said staff could look at some scenarios and come back in about eight weeks with more information and some drawings for consideration by the full Council. He invited the public to submit within the next two weeks written comments for evaluation, and asked the press to help bring this to the attention of the public. He said the issues to be considered at the next meeting include multi -family parking, roof top open space, and open space City Council Minutes 02-29-99 Page 10200 on the ground, as well as two issues not discussed this evening --parking requirements for buildings nonconforming to parking and clarification of lot coverage definition. Action: Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, that the public hearing on residential development standards be continued to Tuesday, May 2, 2000, at 7:10 P.M. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, February 29, 2000, at the hour of 11:40 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, March 14, 2000, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. City Council Minutes 02-29-99 Page 10201 VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 020610 VOID 020634 VOID 020651 VOID PAGE 1 VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 20604 03/09/00 009600 A TOUCH OF CARPET 20605 03/09/00 010091 PAUL ALCUS 20606 03/09/00 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 20607 03/09/00 009366 AQUA FLO 20608 03/09/00 009901 EDGAR ARNDT 20609 03/09/00 005179 AT&T 20611 03/09/00 008630 AVIS 20612 03/09/00 003136 ROBERT BENZ 20613 03/09/00 010016 BEST WESTERN 20614 03/09/00 000136 BROOKS PRODUCTS 20615 03/09/00 005621 STEPHEN R. BURRELL 20616 03/09/00 008436 EDGAR CALDERON 20617 03/09/00 010095 20618 03/09/00 005595 20619 03/09/00 005935 CALIF STATE FIREFIGHTER CALIFORNIA CHARTER CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CARPET PURCHASE/THEATER CITATION REFUND SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV/2/13-26 TRENCHING SHOVELS REPAIR WORK PAVERS/WINDMILL LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DIST DISTANCE CHRG'S/FEB 2000 DISTANCE CHRG'S/FEB 2000. DIST CHARG'S/FEB 2000 DISTANCE CHRG'S/FEB 2000 DISTANCE CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CHRG'S/FEB 2000 CITATION REFUND REIMBURS TRAVEL EXPENSES LODGING/GAROFANO MAN HOLE COVERS REIMBURS TRAVEL EXPENSES THEATRE TECH/2/20 & 2/26/00 SERVICE DIRECTORIES TRANSPORTATION/BIG BEAR SPECIAL PROMENADE CLEANING JAN CREDIT ADJUSTMENT JAN 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 125-8627-4201 110-3302 001-2102-4201 001-4202-4309 001-2125 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4601-4304 001-4204-4321 110-1204-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4201-4304 110-3302 001-1101-4317 001-2201-4317 105-2601-4309 001-1201-4317 001-4601-4201 001-2201-4305 145-3409-4201 109-3301-4201 109-3301-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 6,838.92 20.00 2,334.50 118.38 850.00 .95 .24 .47 3.80 4.05 9.26 5.94 6.17 .47 71.72 30.40 4.27 6.89 47.97 27.31 4.75 12.82 14.41 15.46 18.19 8.71 12.26 20.00 1,119.03 44.00 554.88 14.00 137.50 40.00 792.44 1,000.00 812.90 - PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 6,838.92 20.00 2,334.50 118.38 850.00 306.51 20.00 1,119.03 44.00 554.88 14.00 137.50 40.00 792.44 187.10 VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 20620 03/09/00 010090 MARIANNE J. CIGLIANO CITATION REFUND 20621 03/09/00 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY REMANUFACTURED CARTRIDGE 20622 03/09/00 008893 COLUMBIA BUSINESS FORMS CHECKS FOR LIABILITY ACCOUNT 20623 03/09/00 000041 VIKI COPELAND 20624 03/09/00 010097 CPPA/DMV TRAINING 20625 03/09/00 008855 D & D DISPOSAL INC. 20626 03/09/00 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE REIMBURS TRAVEL EXPENSE REGISTRATION/HALL ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302 715-1206-4309 705-1209-4305 001-1202-4317 110-1204-4317 DEAD ANIMAL DISPOSAL/FEB 2000 110-3302-4201 RECRUITMENT ADS/FEB 2000 20627 03/09/00 000047 DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL ANNUAL PHYSICALS/FIREMEN 20628 03/09/00 008242 LYNDA DESLANDES 20629 03/09/00 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT 20630 03/09/00 000122 DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 20631 03/09/00 008691 EARTHLINK NETWORK 20632 03/09/00 000704 THE ECONOMICS PRESS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/WINTER 99 TO REPLACE LOST CHECK FILM DEVELOPED/MARCH 2000 PARKING METER PARTS INTERNET ACCESS CONTRACT SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 20633 03/09/00 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4320 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4305 110-3302-4309 715-1206-4201 001-1202-4317 715-4206-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4201-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3104-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4309 001-2021 001-2022 715-4201-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 20.00 20.00 413.33 413.33 347.51 347.51 133.95 133.95 50.00 50.00 200.00 200.00 877.04 877.04 2,000.00 2,000.00 378.00 142.10 520.10 19.02 19.02 4,629.97 4,629.97 495.00 495.00 46.54 46.54 26.51 .54 .54- 47.95 .98 .98- 49.71 1.01 1.01- 9.78 .20 .20- 11.56 .24 .24- 4.22 .09 .09- 27.92 .57 .57- 33.80 .69 .69- VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN RETURNED AUTO PARTS AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB DISCOUNT OFFERED" 9 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4309 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4309 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 -001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3104-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 ITEM AMOUNT 22.49 .46 .46- 27.04 .55 .55- 25.21 .51 .51- 26.21 .53 .53- 25.46- 18.30 .37 .37- 178.82 3.65 3.65- 55.78 1.14 1.14- 73.45 1.50 1.50- 3.37 .07 .07- 6.20 .13 .13- 14.04 .29 .29- 28.52 .58 .58- 48.11 .98 .98- 13.62 .28 .28- 43.85 .89 .89- 44.64 .91 .91- 13.37 .27 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASES/FEB 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN CREDIT RETURNED MERCHANDISE 20635 03/09/00 000830 EQUITABLE LIFE OF IOWA PREMIUM/DILLER 20636 03/09/00 010092 CAROLYN EVANS 20637 03/09/00 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 20638 03/09/00 010099 FIRE RESCUE WEST 20639 03/09/00 009138 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 20640 03/09/00 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES 20641 03/09/00 008266 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES CITATION REFUND FEDERAL EXPRESS/MAR 2000 REGISTRATION/CRAWFORD REGISTRATION/HAHN SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL LIABILITY TRUST ACCOUNT WORKER'S COMP ADMIN 20642 03/09/00 008931 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES,TR WORKER COMP CLAIMS/2/17-29/00 WORKER COMP CLAIM/2/24/00 PER DIEM CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING CITATION REFUND 20643 03/09/00 008652 MICHAEL GAROFANO 20644 03/09/00 010062 ANTHONY GERARDI 20645 03/09/00 010102 KIMBERLY A. GILFILLEN 20646 03/09/00 009964 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIP FLAMMABLE LIQUID CABINET 20647 03/09/00 008071 GORDON H. CHONG & ASSOC PARKING STRUCTURE CONTRACT 20648 03/09/00 007953 GEN A GREANEY 20649 03/09/00 001340 GTE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SUMMER 99 EQUIP RENTAL/2/22-3/22 20650 03/09/00 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 5 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-1203-4188 110-3302 001-4202-4201 001-2201-4317 001-2201-4317 001-2201-4315 705-1209-4324 705-1217-4201 705-1217-4324 705-1217-4201 001-2201-4317 110-3302 110-3302 001-2201-5401 121-8624-4201 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 715-1206-4304 110-3302-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4204-4321 001-2201-4304 001-4601-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4201-4304 109-3304-4304 110-1204-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 ITEM AMOUNT .27- 12.68 .26 .26- 53.58- 4,159.00 10.00 14.33 260.00 260.00 28.97 3,808.14 2,333.33 17,481.68 21,138.00 250.00 80.00 20.00 581.30 320.32 56.00 51.56 61.28 213.59 64.21 1,421.88 54.10 109.36 72.52 95.97 70.05 27.22 30.65 5.47 1.36 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 788.11 4,159.00 10.00 14.33 520.00 28.97 3,808.14 2,333.33 38,619.68 250.00 80.00 20.00 581.30 320.32 56.00 51.56 VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 20652 03/09/00 20653 03/09/00 20654 03/09/00 VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/JAN 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECKS/12/8-1/10/00 PLAN CHECKS/9/29-12/23 007956 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL TO REPLACE CHECK LOST IN MAIL 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECTRIC SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 20655 03/09/00 010089 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. 20656 03/09/00 007880 JAMESTOWN PRESS 20657 03/09/00 010093 RICHARD KIM MEMBERSHIP/TINGLEY BUSINESS CARDS CITATION REFUND 20658 03/09/00 001320 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. UNIFORM/OFFICER PESSIS 20659 03/09/00 000183 CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH MAINT. COST ARTESIA MEDIAN ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 001-2135 001-4202-4309 001-2201-4315 001-1208-4305 110-3302 001-2101-4187 105-2601-4201 20660 03/09/00 010094 DONALD MCVICAR CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302 ITEM AMOUNT 2.74 21.89 23.25 53.35 34.20 35.57 2.74 413.11 175.09 24.62 39.67 276.32 157.31 27.36 73.87 9.00 2.25 4.50 36.00 38.25 87.76 56.26 58.51 4.50 679.56 288.03 40.50 65.26 454.54 258.77 45.00 121.51 4,764.44 9,902.31 173.20 294.44 180.00 64.95 9.00 797.12 656.67 330.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 5,838.95 14,666.75 173.20 294.44 180.00 64.95 9.00 797.12 656.67 330.00 VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 20661 03/09/00 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND 20662 03/09/00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION LEGAL BILLING/FEB 2000 008170 MUNICIPAL MAINT. EQUIPM PARTS FOR GO-4/FEB 2000 20663 03/09/00 009715 NEW PIG CORPORATION 20664 03/09/00 009854 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 20665 03/09/00 009606 0 P CONSTRUCTION 20666 03/09/00 000093 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 20667 03/09/00 003417 ORIENTAL TRADING CO. 20668 03/09/00 MAINT SUPPLIES CELLULAR PHONE PURCHASE WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND WINDSHIELD REPLACED/FEB 2000 PROGRAM SUPPLIES/SPRING 2000 002487 PAGING NETWORK OF ORANG PAGER SERVICES/JAN 2000 PAGER SERVICES/JAN 2000 PAGER SERVICES/JAN 2000 PAGER SERVICES/JAN 2000 PAGER SERVICES/JAN 2000 PAGER SERVICES/JAN 2000 PAGER SERVICES/JAN 2000 20669 03/09/00 007360 LARRY PEHA 20670 03/09/00 009852 QUANTUM CONSULTING WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/MYTLE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/LOMA CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/LOMA CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/MYTLE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/LOMA 20671 03/09/00 007511 REDONDO BCH UNIFIED SCH PRE-EMPLOYMENT FINGERPRINTING 20672 03/09/00 002927 REGISTRAR -RECORDER 20673 03/09/00 005379 ELECTION SERVICES/NOV 99 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL BILLING/JAN 2000 LEGAL BILLING/JAN 2000 LEGAL BILLING/JAN 2000 LEGAL BILLING/FEB 2000 20674 03/09/00 008871 LYN RILEY, EMS EDUCATIO MANDATED TRAINING PROGRAM 20675 03/09/00 008604 SOUTH BAY FIRE CHIEFS A 2000 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 20676 03/09/00 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS 20677 03/09/00 000159 WELDING SUPPLIES/MARCH 2000 WELDING SUPPLIES/DEC 2000 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ELECTRIC BILLING/FEB 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAR 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/MAR 2000 7 • ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1132-4201 715-3302-4311 001-3104-4309 170-2103-5401 001-2110 001-2110 715-2101-4311 001-4601-4308 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4201 001-2110 307-8182-4201 307-8182-4201 307-8182-4201 307-8182-4201 307-8182-4201 001-1203-4201 001-1121-4251 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2201-4315 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 105-2601-4303 001-4204-4303 160-3102-4303 105-2601-4303 ITEM AMOUNT 6,320.00 152.36 292.34 926.56 1,600.00 1,600.00 226.24 316.60 81.01 2.50 2.25 2.50 15.00 42.50- 2.50 1,600.00 6,376.50 3,802.50 8,365.50 2,983.50 6,727.50 480.00 26,023.74 6,705.34 413.50 435.00 279.05 1,250.00 200.00 6.20 36.53 118.36 6,481.18 96.91 240.77 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 6,320.00 152.36 292.34 926.56 3,200.00 226.24 316.60 63.26 1,600.00 28,255.50 480.00 26,023.74 7,832.89 1,250.00 200.00 42.73 VOUCHRE2 03/09/00 17:10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/FEB 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/FEB 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/FEB 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/FEB 2000 ELECTRIC BILLING/FEB 2000 20678 03/09/00 010104 SRI LANKA CREATIVE ARTS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 20679 03/09/00 010101 DANIEL K. TILLUNG 20680 03/09/00 003336 TOMARK 20681 03/09/00 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND LITTLE LEAGUE EQUIPMENT LITTLE LEAGUE EQUIPMENT DE WATT HAMMER DRILL & KIT WALL MOUNT HAND DRYER 20682 03/09/00 006678 WEARABLE ART CONNECTION RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 20683 03/09/00 007785 WEST COVINA SERVICES GR COMPUTER REPAIR WORK 20684 03/09/00 008767 WEST GROUP CALIF PENAL CODES 20685 03/09/00 000141 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CALIFORNIA JURY INSTRUCTIONS 20686 03/09/00 010103 WYNDHAM BRISTOL 20687 03/09/00 010100 WYNDHAM HOTEL 20688 03/09/00 000315 YAMADA COMPANY INC. LODGING/OAKES HOTEL/CRAWFORD & HAHN MOWER REPLACEMENT PARTS MOWER REPLACEMENT PARTS TOTAL CHECKS 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-3104-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 105-2601-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-2111 001-2110 125-8530-4201 125-8530-4201 001-3104-5401 125-8530-4201 001-2111 001-2101-4201 001-1121-4201 001-2101-4317 001-1101-4317 001-2201-4317 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 572.45 10.15 13.82 122.92 173.17 311.00 500.00 1,600.00 504.81 504.81 308.51 824.86 500.00 400.00 1,326.06 34.91 494.64 611.60 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 8,140.73 500.00 1,600.00 1,009.62 1,133.37 500.00 400.00 1,326.06 34.91 494.64 611.60 169.90 66.98 236.88 190,951.57 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17:10 VOUCHRE2 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 03/09/00FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 96,268.45 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 2,113.80 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 214.32 110 PARKING FUND 5,789.83 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 320.32 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 8,673.40 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 792.44 160 SEWER FUND 96.91 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 926.56 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 28,255.5058 28, . 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,391.388 66 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND TOTAL 190,951.57 PAGE 9 VOUCHRE2 03/14/00 08:32 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 20689 03/14/00 000740 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE POSTAGE/BULK MAIL 001-4101-4201 1,132.35 1,132.35 TOTAL CHECKS 1,132.35 J0 VOUCHRE2 03/14/00 08:32 • S CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 1,132.35 TOTAL 1,132.35 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 03/16/00 16:38 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 20690 03/16/00 000029 A-1 COAST SANITATION, I SANITATION UNITS/PIER 20691 03/16/00 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR 20692 03/16/00 010126 AMERICAN THEATRE ARTS 20693 03/16/00 010118 TERI ANDERSON CELL PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 CELL PHONE BILLING/FEB 2000 RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 20694 03/16/00 009192 ARB, INC. CONSTRUCTORS RETENTION RELEASE 20695 03/16/00 005179 AT&T 20696 03/16/00 000252 BEACH TRAVEL LONG DISTANCE CHARG'S/FEB 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/FEB 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHARG'S/FEB 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/FEB 2000 AIR FARE/GAROFANO 20697 03/16/00 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS ASPHALT PURCHASE/MARCH 2000 ASPHALT PURCHASE/MAR 2000 20698 03/16/00 006907 WILLIAM BRUCE 20699 03/16/00 010108 ANN BUTLER 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE GUEST PERMIT REFUND 20700 03/16/00 000838 CALIFORNIA FENCE & SUPP CHAIN LINK FENCE INSTALLED 20701 03/16/00 010114 CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 20702 03/16/00 000262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVI CUSTOM STAMP MADE 20703 03/16/00 003027 CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUS TUITION/COOK/POST CLASS 20704 03/16/00 008811 DIANE CLEARY 20705 03/16/00 010122 SUSAN COLLECTOR MINUTES TRANSCRIPTION/PLANNING CLASS REFUND 20706 03/16/00 009614 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SER 300' NOTICING/FEB 29/00 APPEAL NOTICES MAILED 300' NOTICING/MARCH 2000 20707 03/16/00 002173 20708 03/16/00 001390 20709 03/16/00 004689 20710 03/16/00 010121 20711 03/16/00 009956 NANCY COOK DAPPER TIRE CO. DATA TICKET, INC. GLENN DAVIDSON ELLIOT DIAMOND INC. MEALS/POST CLASS/MARCH 2000 TIRE PURCHASE/ENGINE 11 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/MAR 2000 CLASS REFUND 14" DIAMOND CONCRETE BLADE 12. ACCOUNT NUMBER 160-3102-4201 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2111 001-2111 121-2020 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4317 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 105-3105 110-3843 125-8530-4201 001-2201-4315 001-4201-4305 001-2101-4312 001-4101-4201 001-2111 001-4101-4201 001-4101-4201 001-4101-4201 001-2101-4312 715-2201-4311 110-1204-4201 001-2111 001-3104-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 1,464.97 376.92 91.17 500.00 50.00 235,942.25 11.73 8.91 11.88 15.98 312.00 82.88 64.67 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 1,464.97 468.09 500.00 50.00 235,942.25 48.50 312.00 147.55 24.61 24.61 29.00 29.00 1,390.00 1,390.00 60.00 60.00 22.73 22.73 247.00 247.00 280.50 280.50 75.00 75.00 7,320.30 225.00 980.00 8,525.30 24.00 24.00 469.18 469.18 33.32 33.32 70.00 70.00 974.00 974.00 VOUCHRE2 03/16/00 16:38 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 20712 03/16/00 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL FILM PURCHASE/MARCH 2000 20713 03/16/00 001958 TOM ECKERT TUITION REIMBURSMENT/SPRING 20714 03/16/00 008661 EMERG SPEC PHYS MEDICAL PRISONER MEDICAL/FEB 2000 PRISONER MEDICAL/FEB 2000 REFUND/EXCURSION E-MAIL/WEB PAGE STORAGE/MAR CITATION REFUND CITATION REFUND 20715 03/16/00 010123 LOUISE EVANS 20716 03/16/00 009056 GTE INTERNETWORKING 20717 03/16/00 010111 NICHOLAS HANNEMANN 20718 03/16/00 010109 DEMESHA HARDY 20719 03/16/00 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP BUILDING/2/16-29/00 20720 03/16/00 008576 HEC RAMSEY ENTERPRISES GUEST PARKING PASSES 20721 03/16/00 000322 HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL EUTHANASIA/FEB 2000 20722 03/16/00 010113 HERMOSA BEACH LAWNBOWLI CLASS INSTRUCTION 20723 03/16/00 010128 HERMOSA CYCLERY 20724 03/16/00 003432 HOME DEPOT/GECF 20725 03/16/00 005356 JOHN HUNTER & ASSOC. 20726 03/16/00 003055 ICBG 20727 03/16/00 009949 IRISH CONSTRUCTION 20728 03/16/00 006293 KINKO'S INC. 20729 03/16/00 000792 CAPTAIN MICHAEL LAVIN 20730 03/16/00 001359 THE LIGHTHOUSE INC. 20731 03/16/00 005813 LITTLE CO OF MARY PATH 20732 03/16/00 010120 MICHAEL LOPEZ HELMETS/SKATE TRACK LUMBER PURCHASE/FEB 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/FEB 2000 LUMBER PURCHASE/FEB 2000 PAINT & SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/FEB 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/FEB 2000 PLYWOOD & TILE/FEB 2000 ADMIN STORM WATER PROGRAM RENEWAL CERTIFICATE/SWARTZ MYRTLE UNDERGROUNDING CONTRACT COPY SERVICES/FEB 2000 COPY SERVICES/FEB 2000 COPY SERVICES/FEB 2000 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT/SPRING REPLACE AMBER LENS/GO-4'S PRISONER MEDICAL/FEB 2000 CLASS REFUND 3 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4101-4305 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2111 715-1206-4304 110-3302 110-3302 001-4201-4201 110-1204-4305 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4308 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4309 001-4202-4309 001-4204-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 160-3102-4201 001-4201-4315 307-8182-4201 001-4202-4201 001-2101-4305 001-4202-4201 001-2101-4317 715-3302-4311 001-2101-4201 001-2111 PAGE 2 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 136.40 136.40 551.00 551.00 155.00 240.00 395.00 20.00 20.00 135.90 135.90 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 2,380.00 2,380.00 358.85 358.85 35.00 35.00 28.00 28.00 270.63 270.63 109.98 48.85 159.24 78.93 48.64 355.82 98.55 900.01 1,006.73 1,006.73 75.00 75.00 155,930.04 155,930.04 35.07 22.51 139.77 630.00 136.40 46.75 78.00 197.35 630.00 136.40 46.75 78.00 VOUCHRE2 03/16/00 16:38 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 20733 03/16/00 010115 LOS ANGELES COUNTY AUDI REMOVE LEVY, PRE -PAYS 20734 03/16/00 007252 ELEANOR LYNN 20735 03/16/00 010117 ROBERT MAIDANA 20736 03/16/00 009679 PATTY MAYFIELD REFUND/EXCURSION ACCOUNT NUMBER 617-2253 001-2111 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302 CLASS REFUND 20737 03/16/00 009825 MEMRAD MEDICAL GROUP,IN PRISONER MEDICAL/JAN 2000 20738 03/16/00 005848 DIANE MILLER 20739 03/16/00 008975 MOBIL FLEET 20740 03/16/00 009854 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 20741 03/16/00 004356 SHELDON OSEKOWSKY 20742 03/16/00 000321 PACIFIC BELL REFUND EXCURSION GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 GAS CARD PURCHASE/FEB 2000 CELL PHONE SERVICES/FEB 2000 PER DIEM/FIRE MECHANICS COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/MARCH 2000 COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/MARCH 2000 COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/MARCH 2000 20743 03/16/00 009862 PACIFIC PRINTING BUSINESS LICENSE PAPER 20744 03/16/00 007541 LOUISE PALERMO 20745 03/16/00 008482 PMX MEDICAL SPECIALTY MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 20746 03/16/00 003820 POSTMASTER 20747 03/16/00 010096 RESCUE PHONE INC. CRT RESCUE PHONE 20748 03/16/00 010019 ERIC RICKS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/FEB 2000 20749 03/16/00 010124 CAROL ROSEN REFUND/EXCURSION 20750 03/16/00 009870 RYDIN DECAL PARKING DECALS & PERMITS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/WINTER 2000 NNUAL FEE BULK MAIL PERMIT #52 �y 001-2111 001-2101-4201 001-2111 715-2101-4310 715-2201-4310 715-4201-4310 715-4202-4310 715-3302-4310 715-3104-4310 715-4601-4310 715-2601-4310 715-3102-4310 715-4204-4310 715-4206-4310 001-1250 715-1236 715-2101-4310 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4317 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 110-1204-4305 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4309 001-4601-4302 170-2103-5402 001-4601-4221 001-2111 110-1204-4305 PAGE 3 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 65.00 65.00 16.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 86.00 86.00 191.00 191.00 36.00 36.00 1,708.62 126.59 30.31 111.69 241.91 220.41 46.44 188.33 29.02 28.80 32.88 64.39 114.36 27.72 2,971.47 231.68 231.68 250.00 250.00 3.35 56.75 117.02 177.12 147.48 147.48 1,008.00 1,008.00 53.86 53.86 100.00 100.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 100.00 100.00 20.00 20.00 3,311.00 3,311.00 VOUCHRE2 03/16/00 16:38 s • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 20751 03/16/00 010105 TIMOTHY J. SCHNEIDER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 001-4601-4221 80.00 80.00 20752 03/16/00 004187 SHARP SEATING COMPANY ROSE PARADEDEPOSIT 001-4601-4201 504.00 504.00 20753 03/16/00 010119 DARLENE SINATRA CLASS REFUND 001-2111 75.00 CLASS REFUND 001-2111 35.00 110.00 20754 03/16/00 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLIES 001-1101-4305 45.20 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 001-4601-4308 25.19 CLEANING SUPPLIES/FEB 2000 001-2201-4309 101.68 172.07 20755 03/16/00 010085 BRANDON SMITH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/FEB 2000 001-4601-4221 80.00 80.00 20756 03/16/00 010112 GUSTAVO SONGG INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 001-4601-4221 80.00 80.00 20757 03/16/00 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STREET LIGHT BILLING/3/2000 105-2601-4303 8,810.65 ELECTRIC BILLING/03/08/00 001-4202-4303 196.85 9,007.50 20758 03/16/00 009532 STAPLES OFFICE CHAIRS PURCHASE 001-4101-5401 334.48 334.48 20759 03/16/00 007051 ELWIN STEMIG 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE 105-3105 24.61 24.61 20760 03/16/00:,009358 SULLY -MILLER CONTRACTIN MONTEREY BLVD.CONTRACT 301-8143-4201 103,900.27 103,900.27 20761 03/16/00 006991 JEAN THOMPSON 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE 105-3105 24.61 24.61 20762 03/16/00 009153 TOSCO FLEET SERVICES GAS PURCHASES/FEB 2000 715-2201-4310 358.40 GAS PURCHASES/FEB 2000 715-3102-4310 20.70 GAS PURCHASES/FEB 2000 715-1236 23.88 402.98 20763 03/16/00 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE CAMERA PURCHASE 105-2601-4309 194.84 194.84 20764 03/16/00 009078 TRUGREEN LAND CARE REGI LANDSCAPING MAINT 001-4202-4201 10,900.00 LANDSCAPING MAINT 105-2601-4201 1,400.00 12,300.00 20765 03/16/00 008097 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNI SAFEKEEPING FEE/JAN 2000 001-1141-4201 208.33 208.33 20766 03/16/00 009476 UNIVERSAL ARMORY RIFLE PURCHASE 170-2103-5401 944.72 944.72 20767 03/16/00 001938 V & V MANUFACTURING POLICE OFFICER BADGES 001-2101-4187 1,769.54 1,769.54 20768 03/16/00 010107 EVELYN M. VAN KREUNINGE CITATION REFUND 110-3302 20.00 20.00 20769 03/16/00 010017 WESLEY WATANABE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 001-4601-4221 80.00 80.00 20770 03/16/00 010035 WESTCHESTER CARPET ARMSTRONG CLASSIC FLOORING 001-4204-4309 998.56 SUBFLOOR IN KITCHEN/COM CENTER 001-4204-4309 240.00 1,238.56 20771 03/16/00 009346 DAWN WINZEN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 001-4601-4221 44.80 44.80 20772 03/16/00 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS PETTY CASH REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 001-1101-4317 16.60 15 VOUCHRE2 03/16/00 16:38 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME • • 20773 03/16/00 010125 ERIKA ZIMMERMANN 20774 03/16/00 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 20775 03/16/00 010116 MEGAN ZUSI CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REIMBURSMENT/3/1-14 REFUND/EXCURSION POST PULLER CITATION REFUND TOTAL CHECKS rQ ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-2101-4311 001-1101-4305 715-1206-4309 001-1201-4317 001-1202-4317 001-4101-4305 001-4601-4308 001-4202-4317 715-2101-4310 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4312 001-2111 001-3104-4309 110-3302 ITEM AMOUNT 79.53 2.02 149.37 20.00 6.75 63.04 14.96 95.00 20.00 42.47 40.50 16.00 112.98 30.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 550.24 16.00 112.98 30.00 560,014.20 VOUCHRE2 03/16/00 16:38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 36,075.81 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 10,479.32 110 PARKING FUND 4,014.65 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 235,942.25 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 1,390.00 160 SEWER FUND 2,471.70 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 5,444.72 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 103,900.27 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 155,930.04 617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND 65.00 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 4,300.44 TOTAL 560,014.20 1 1 • PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 03/20/00 08:15 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 20776 03/20/00 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 001-1103 276,975.66 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 105-1103 7,043.67 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 109-1103 805.38 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 110-1103 28,085.82 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 117-1103 606.35 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 145-1103 1,555.74 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 152-1103 68.36 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 160-1103 7,671.64 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 705-1103 2,344.66 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-00 715-1103 4,695.51 329,852.79 TOTAL CHECKS 329,852.79 18 VOUCHRE2 03/20/00 08:15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 276,975.66 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 7,043.67 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 805.38 110 PARKING FUND 28,085.82 117 AB939 FUND 606.35 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,555.74 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 68.36 160 SEWER FUND 7,671.64 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,344.66 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 4,695.51 TOTAL 329,852.79 IR • PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 03/20/00 08:15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THED ANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED PAGES ! TO /INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR 1 WNW A E ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY 1/ ,/ FINANCEIDIRRECTOR DATE �t Vit[ PAGE 3 • • March 14, 2000 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council March 28, 2000 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below: #20367 — 02/15/00 - $ 312.51 Fisher Safety. Check was issued to wrong vendor. #20643 — 03/09/00 - $ 250.00 Michael Garofano. Check was lost A stop was placed on the check. #20686 — 03/09/00 - $ 494.64 Wyndham Bristol. Check was not used. Conference was not attended. Concur: Step rrell, City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director M. Workman, City Treasur • March 23, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 1 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND An appeal of the Planning Commission denial of a variance to allow the required parking, including guest space, to be in tandem at 1250 - 8th Street, legally described as the westerly 12.5' of Lot 44 and all of Lot 45, Block 140, Redondo Villa Tract. MAYOR PRO TEMPORE Community Development Director Financial Reports for February 2000 Finance Director 2000/2001 City Council Goals/Workplan Monthly Activity Reports for March Financial Reports for March 2000 City Manager All Departments Finance Director .........................................::::::::...........:::::::::... :1l2:': ............................................................................................... Local Coastal Plan Hearing Community Development Director Housing Element Consultant - Award contract Community Development Director Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council March 23, 2000 City Council Meeting of March 28, 2000 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS FEBRUARY 2000 The February Revenue and Expenditure status reports are not available at this time due to budget preparation. The Revenue and Expenditure status reports will be in your April 11, 2000 agenda packets. NOTED: 41A Ste •li , Viki Copeland Finance Director Respectfully submitted, R. urrell City Manager ld h:\b95\open\revexp.doc • ACTION SHEET AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS March 21, 2000 7:00 P.M. Sam Perrotti Chairman Chris Ketz Vice Chair Ron Pizer Carol Schwartz Peter Hoffman 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call. COMM. SCHWARTZ ARRIVED LATER. Section I Consent Calendar Any Planning Commissioner or public wishing to pull an item from below may request to do so at this time. 3. Approval of February 15, 2000 minutes ACTION: APPROVED (3-0; COMM. KETZ ABSTAINED & COMM. SCHWARTZ ABSENT). 4. Resolution(s) for adoption a. Resolution P.C. 00-8 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25750 for a two -unit condominium project at 601 - 603 2nd Street. b. Resolution P.C. 00-9 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25869 for a two -unit condominium project at 1141 - 1145 Cypress Avenue. c. Resolution P.C. 00-10 approving an addition to an existing single family dwelling which extends an existing nonconforming side yard at 658 Gould Avenue. d. Resolution P.C. 00-11 approving a lot line adjustment between 1230 1 lth Place and 1246 l lth Place e. Resolution P.C. 00-12 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25751 for a two -unit condominium project at 1214 and 1216 Monterey Boulevard. i • f. Resolution P.C. 00-13 to recommend amending the Zoning Ordinance to clarify the limits for expanding and remodeling nonconforming buildings (Chapter 17.52) that do not comply with parking requirement. g. Resolution P.C. 00-14 to recommend amending the Zoning Ordinance to amend the definition of lot coverage. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0; COMM. KETZ ABSTAINED & COMM. SCHWARTZ ABSENT). 5. Item(s) for consideration Section II Oral / Written Communications 6. Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section III Public Hearing(s) 7. C-31 -- Completion of the Local Coastal Program pursuant to the California Coastal Act. Includes amending the City's Coastal Land Use Plan, and a Text Amendment to adopt regulations to implement the policies of the Land Use Plan and Coastal Act. Will result in the City obtaining permit authority for development within the Coastal Zone. Staff Recommended Action: To take public testimony, review the Coastal Land Use Plan and continue to a special meeting of the Planning Commission on April 5, 2000. ACTION: CONTINUED TO A SPECIAL MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, APRIL 5, 2000 (5-0). 8. CUP 99-3 - Revocation or modification of a Conditional Use Permit allowing on -sale general alcohol and extended hours of operation in conjunction with a restaurant at 934 Hermosa Avenue, Ibiza. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the attached resolution modifying the Conditional Use Permit. ACTION: APPROVED TO MODIFY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH NEW RESTRICTIONS ON OPERATING AND DATE CERTAIN TO COMPLETE OUTSTANDING CONDITIONS, OBTAIN PERMITS, CORRECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT VIOLATIONS AND BRING BACK FOR RECONSIDERATION ON JUNE 20, 2000 (4-1; COMM. SCHWARTZ NO). 9. CON 99-30/PDP 99-36/VAR 99-7 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25678 for a conversion of an existing duplex into a two - unit condominium and Variance to the 30' height limit at 1136 - 1140 Monterey Boulevard (continued from November 16, 1999, December 1,1999, January 18, 2000 and February 15, 2000 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: Project withdrawn by the applicant. ACTION: WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT. 10. PDP 00-3 -- Precise Development Plan for addition of a second unit to an existing single family residence and the remodel of an existing garage at 43 20th Street (continued from 2 February 15, 2000 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (5-0). 11. VAR 00-1 -- Variance to allow the expansion and remodel of a building with nonconforming front and side yards at 122 2nd Street with the following variances: 1) Lot coverage - 73% rather than maximum 65%; 2) Increase in valuation of nonconforming building greater than 100%; 3) Parking - no guest parking rather than required one space (continued from February 15, 2000 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To continue to April 18, 2000 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO APRIL 18, 2000 MEETING (5-0). 12. ZON 00-1/CON 00-2/PDP 00-2 -- Zone Change from M-1, Light Manufacturing, to R-2, Multi -family Residential, or to such other zone as deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission, and Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map #53116 for a twelve -unit condominium, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 603 1st Place, and 112, 138 & 142 Ardmore Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: 1) To recommend approval of said Zone Change and adoption of the Environmental Negative Declaration. 2) To approve said Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for a 12 -unit condominium and adopt the Environmental Negative Declaration. ACTION: APPROVED (5-0). 13. CON 00-3/PDP 00-4 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25473 for a two -unit condominium at 1041 Monterey Boulevard / 1042 Bayview Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said requests. ACTION: APPROVED (5-0). 14. L-5 -- Legal determination on whether the two dwelling units and conversion of a garage to a bedroom existing were lawfully created and constitute a legal nonconformity at 77 14th Street / 76 15th Court (continued from February 15, 2000 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To validate the two dwelling units, the west bedroom, and the conversion of the garage as legal nonconforming with respect to zoning requirements. ACTION: APPROVED (5-0). Section IV Hearing(s) 15. NR 00-1 -- Nonconforming remodel and 172 square foot addition for an existing duplex with one parking space per dwelling unit at 641 and 643 30th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (5-0). Section V 16. Staff Items a. Code interpretation of parking dimension requirements at 833 14th Street. 3 • ACTION: APPROVED (5-0). b. Status of proposed changes to single and multi family development standards. c. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. d. Community Development Department Activity Report of January, 2000. e. City Council minutes of January 25, February 8 and 22, 2000. ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED 16B -E. 17. Commissioner Items 18. Adjournment 4 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIM Recommendation: March 22, 2000 Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 It is recommended that City Council deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: 1. Claimant: Guirges, Raef S. Date of Loss: 03-07-00 Date Filed: 03-14-00 Allegation: Damage to door done by Police Officers A copy of this claim is on file with the City Clerk's office. Respectfully ubmitted, Concur: M. hael A. Earl, Director Stephen R. Burrell ersonnel & Risk Management City Manager 1f 0=1/07/ 2000 1056 310318013500 HERMOISA BEACH POI• PAGE 02/04 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY FILE WITH: City Cleric's Office City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach,CA 90254 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Clams for death, Injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than six months after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec_ 911.2) 2. Claims for damages to teat property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) 3. Read entire claim form before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2. at bottom. • 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP DEPT_ NO. r- 1 Home Address Of. Claimant Business Address of Claimant Date Of Birth Of Claimant 4 - / —S' Occupation gf- latmant G7)' q45o M6717-iof/v. 1-ep• do5, Give address and telephone number to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim; t)at© of Damage/Loss/injury p4 7 Place of Darr ..,i-oss/injury Home Telephone Number. Business Telephone Number 3 Glalmant'Social Security y� ,em. Time P.M. How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) Were Police at scene Yes Were Paramedics at scene?---D04/,F uY What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damagefloss/injury. v l ,n oC73i13 Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: • 1 : _:i-11��'.IuL _l��t_1 03/07/2000 tl. c ��� HERMOSi•. BEACH POL. PAGE @3/04 The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is Damages incurred to data (exact): Expenses for medical and hospital care Loss of earnings $_ Q. -.(CC -7_ w Special damages for General damages fJ.$-/X4-- a ---- -��1-- Trtel damages incurred to date ISL/V/ yo computed as follows: (please attach estimatesfreceipts) Estimated expenses for medical and hospital care Future expenses for medical and hospital care Future loss of earnings Other prospective special damages Prospective general damages $ Total estimate prospective �� damages WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY: LIST ALL PERSONS and addresses of persons known to have information: Address Phone Name Name Name • Address Address Phone Phone DOCTORS and HOSPITALS: t-iospitai___ Address Doctor Address Doctor Address Date Hospitalized Date of Treatment Data of Treatment READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following diagram names when you first saw Gity vehicle: location of City vehicle of streets, including North, East, South, and West: Indicate at time of accident by A 'i' and location of yourself or place �f accident by X. and shoving house number or your vehicle at the time of the accident by 13-1'and the disianoes to street corners. If City vehicle was involved, point of impact by 'X.". designate by letter "A' location of City vehicle when you NOTE: if diagrams below do not fit the situation, first saw it, and by 'B' location of yourself or your vehicle attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. Signatu giving r March 22, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council March 28, 2000 ELECTRONIC PARKING METERS FOR LOT B RECOMMENDATION: 1. It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of forty electronic parking meters for Downtown Parking Lot B from the Parking fund. 2. Appropriate $7,575 from the Parking Fund for the purchase. BACKGROUND: Downtown Parking Lot B is being repaired and striped for designated metered parking stalls. Forty electronic meters would cover the stalls available in Lot B area. Community Services meter maintenance has existing inventory of poles and old housings that can be utilized with the new mechanisms. Electronic meters will allow the future use of the Cash Key System Program in Lot B and continue the upgrade of old mechanical parking meters with new electronic meters in the city. At the Regular Council Meeting of February 22, 2000, Council approved. a $.50/per hour metered parking rate for Lot B. Approximate date of delivery after the order is placed is about one month. Respectfully submitted: VAL STRASER, CHIEF OF POLICE Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Cope and, Finance Director CITY MANAGER rmosa'Beach Police Departure support Services' Division Memorandum Date: 03-13-2000 To: Chief Straser From: Lt. Mark Wright Subject: Lot "B" meters (0ggS.0D ' 577 -3Ll- In an effort to get Lot "B" metered and ready for spring/summer, we will need to have Public Works put in Meters and designated parking stalls will have to be painted in the lot. Richard Contreras and Mike Flaherty have surveyed the area and determined that the likely number of stalls available in that lot is 35 parking stalls. This number will have to be formally verified through an engineer's drawing, but is close enough for purposes of ordering the meters. I would therefore like to order 40 electronic meter mechanisms (the 35 plus 5 spare) to outift the stalls with new electronic meters. We already have the poles and old housings that can be utilised with the new mechanisms. The electronic ones will allow the future use of the cash key system. The mechanisms are $174.95 each (plus tax). We need to process a purchase order as soon as possible since the turn around time on the order is about one month. We order the meters from Duncan -- our sole source for these meters. Lieutenant Mark Wright Hermosa Beach Police Department Support Services Division Commander February 15, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council February 22, 2000 SUBJECT: NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE, LOT A AND LOT B PARKING OPERATIONS Recommendation: That the City Council approve the proposed rates and operations for the downtown. Background: The City Council previously directed staff to meet with downtown businesses to review proposed parking arrangements for the North Pier Parking. Structure, Lot A and Lot B. Staff conducted a meeting on February 10th after distributing 104 notices to business located in the area between 10th to 14th Streets and from Manhattan Avenue to the Strand. There was generally consensus on the proposed parking program. Analysis: The parking program is summarized as follows: Parking ProgramNorth Pier Parking Structure & Lot A Hours of Operation: Daily 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. Daily Rates: $.50 p/hr. Monthly .Passes: $50.00 p/mo. Mirror Hanger Tag * Daily Passes: Daily 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. $25.00 p/mo. Used in Lot A & Structure * Validations: $.50 p/hr. Used in Lot A & Structure Flat Rate: $4.00 p/entry after 9:00 p.m. Seasonal Rates To be determined. *Sold Annually Available in North Pier Parking Structure Office Lot B Metered Parking Rates: $.50 p/hr. On -Street Parking Rates: $.50 p/hr. . Hours of Operation: Daily 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Daily Permits $6.00 p/day, Part of Preferential Parking Coastal Program Employee Parking Permits Rates: $60.00 p/yr. * *Sold annually • DATE:: 7-p-1-9 i . 1. _._,1-u Di •t'N I;\ Ui;l\/I/-, 1 IVH �ct1v�M�/J t ACCOtil!'I.' %IU�LI3ER:. 71 ��fl2 "� _ {i7 JtgiL:sj — 7 Ces P D, 3o'x 3863 i'_r3 11-k. C.2.51 2'2 1- D b' b3 VIZIER ( 1 ATT II. ADDRESS : Ilermosa I3each, CA UI;:L ! DESCRI PTI Uu 32 6:Z- ICoje-6, Mncie/ 70 Si A5io ' GK (EJecfro,,) 2,11 uNM's i— Y�Ji�IS17).1J _S`.al11j Coin bo> VLc4 i 70 ,cls I'Kr) 90754 UIIIT CDS'' 1 TOTAL 326.6.a. 118'715.'1: 1 70. ?.s j -1-N s3,;. 7 < I .I. L>- Sole Source I j 0t.e.- k0 g io ih-t- -• j ct 3i zi(o, l j rr-,njOs,. fid; +k€ T [ 1 X DELIVERY TOTAL _osc1e s 7tovz. g PA RTIi 1 HEAD/DESIGiy .ti• BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE 7-1-9 2 REC ll • March 20, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 CHANGING THE WEEKLY JAZZ CONCERTS ON THE PLAZA FROM WEDNESDAY TO THURSDAY AND WAIVING INSURANCE REQUIREMENT Recommendation Staff recommends that Council: 1. Approve the request from the Jazz Alumni Club Members to use the Plaza on Thursdays from 5:00 — 9:00 PM instead of Wednesdays from 4:00 — 8:00 PM for jaz' concerts (various storefronts) beginning in May. 2. Waive the insurance requirement for this activity. Background Council Member Edgerton suggested and Council approved the concept of conducting an event on the Plaza focused on senior citizens. Staff received a request from Ozzie Cadena on behalf of Jazz Alumni Members to present free music on the Pla?a for seniors and other jazz enthusiasts. Council approved the original request at the November 23, 1999 meeting. Analysis Ozzie Cadena has been running concerts on most Wednesdays since January 19, 2000. The events have been well supported by the merchants and have been enthusiastically received by the public. Originally, Wednesdays were selected as days that businesses may otherwise be slow and to reduce overlap with other City events. Mr. Cadena believes that Thursdays will assist him with booking performers and with increased attendance. He has agreed to suspend concerts on days that overlap with other City events. Staff anticipated that the Chamber of Commerce would provide liability coverage for the concerts but to date, they have not agreed to. With that in mind, staff is also requesting that the insurance requirement be waived for this activity, as it would be cost prohibitive at this time for the grassroots program (an indemnification clause has been signed by Ozzie Cadena). Fiscal Impact: None Respectfully submitted, Mary Direc r, Community Resources Concur: Ste R. urrell City anager ili PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE MARCH 7, 2000 MEETING Roll Call Present: Chairperson Gonzales, and Commissioners Francis, Bell, Fishman and Hirsch Staff: Rooney Approval of February 1, 2000 Minutes Motion: "To approve as submitted." Francis/Hirsch Ayes: Francis, Bell, Gonzales, and Hirsch Abstain: Fishman Public Comment: Matters for Commission Consideration A. 2000 Commercial Event Applications Mr. Robbie Thane (408 30th Street, Hermosa Beach) of Makai Events addressed the Commission on behalf of the event. Staff (Rooney) addressed the Commission on behalf of the MESP event. Motion: "To approve the event contracts with Makai Events and MESP, and forward to City Council for review and approval." Francis/Bell — All Ayes Items Requested by Commissioners Staff Notes: 1. Revise the Makai Events contract by adding the "best rating" clause to the insurance requirement. 2. Commissioner's Hirsch and Fishman will attend future Foundation Meetings with all Commissioners eventually attending them on a rotating basis. Adjournment: 7:45 PM Hirsch/Fishman - All Ayes Honorable Mayor and Members of March 16, 2000 Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 28, 2000 CIP PROJECT NO. 98-143 MONTEREY BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS 19TH STREET TO HERMOSA AVENUE - ACCEPTANCE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Accept the work by Sully -Miller Contracting Company, of Anaheim, on CIP Project No. 98-143 Street Improvements, and authorize final payment to the contractor (10% retained for 35 days following filing of Certificate of Completion); and 2. Authorize the following budget transfer: Account Amount From: 301-8143-4201 $40,640.48 To: 301-8150-4201 $40,640.48 Background: On September 14, 1999, City Council approved entering into an agreement with Sully -Miller Contracting Company to perform a complete street resurfacing with minor public right-of-way improvements on Monterey Boulevard, from 19th Street to Hermosa Avenue. The following work has been completed: • Replaced various concrete wheelchair ramps and driveway approaches • Replaced cross -gutters and minor sidewalk replacement • Crack Sealing • Street resurfacing and striping The contractor has completed the work to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Analysis: Acceptance of the work and final payment is in order. The original contract amount plus 10% contingency was $202,999.00. Sully -Miller Contracting Company completed the work for $162,358.52, saving the City $40,640.48. 1j Fiscal Impact: The project was completed under budget, therefore, $40,640.48 can be returned to Fund 301. However, staff is recommending that these funds be transferred to Project No. CEP 95-150 to cover the cost to resurface and make minor drainage corrections on 19th Street from Monterey Blvd. to Hermosa Ave. Attachment: Project Location Map Respectfully submitted, Harold C. Willia"11 ms, P.E. Step en R. Burrell Concur: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director 2 City Manager F/B95/Keith/Monterey Blvd —19m -Hermosa /9.8-143 Acceptance .1 RESURFACING OF MONTEREY BLVD. 19th ST. TO HERMOSA AVENUE PROJECT LOCATION MAP RESOLUTION NO. -(,c5) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR SIXTH CYCLE USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT. WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act that provides funds to cities and counties for establishing and maintaining local used oil collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate disposal of used oil, and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by cities and jcounties under the program. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Hermosa Beach City Council authorizes the submittal of an application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for FY 2000 — 2003. SECTION 2. That the Director of Public Works, or their designee, is authorized to execute all necessary applications, contracts, payment requests, agreements and amendments hereto for the purpose of securing grant funds, implement and carry out the grant application. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2000. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY F/B95/Pwfiles/Resos/sixth cycle used oil recycling block grant SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION lk March 16, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council March 28, 2000 USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the application for Block Grant Funds from the State of California Integrated Waste Management Board Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Program. Background: The California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act authorizes the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) to issue grants to enhance the collection and recycling of used lubricating oil. Under the Act, oil manufacturers make a four -cent per quart payment on every quart of lubricating oil sold, transferred or imported into California. The Act mandates the CIWMB to use these funds for specified activities that encourage the legal disposal of used lubricating oil. Public Resources Code 48653 specifically authorizes the CIWMB to issue block grants to local governments for the establishment of new programs or the enhancement of existing programs that address the proper management of used oil. This is also considered a Best Management Practice related to NPDES permit requirements. Analysis: The funds obtained from the Grant Program will be used for publicity and education, including the development, printing and distribution of publicity and education materials related to used oil recycling and the promotion pf near by disposal facilities. Fiscal Impact: There is expected to be negligible fiscal impact for the City. The amount of funds available to the City through this grant is a maximum of $6,743.00 (based on City population). Attachment: Resolution 1k Respectfully submitted, - 6cht- . Homayoun Behboodi Associate Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director 2 Concur: IOfir7 /Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Ste • n . Burrell City Manager F\B95\Pwfiles\Ccitems\used oil recycling block grant 3-28-00 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SIXTH CYCLE USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT. WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act that provides funds to cities and counties for establishing and maintaining local used oil collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate disposal of used oil, and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by cities and counties under the program. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Hermosa Beach City Council authorizes the submittal of an application to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for 2000 — 2003. SECTION 2. That the Director of Public Works, or their designee, is authorized to execute all necessary applications, contracts, payment requests, agreements and amendments hereto for the purpose of securing grant funds, implement and carry out the grant application. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of March 2000. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: F/B95/Pwfiles/Resos/sixth cycle used oil recycling block grant Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 22, 2000 Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. CIP 99-409 SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN GOULD AVENUE AND 24TH STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award the construction contract for the sewer construction and rehabilitation on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) between Gould Avenue and 24th Street to. U -Liner West of Long Beach, California in the amount of $28,250. 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to approval by the city Attorney; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the budget of $2,825. Background: During routine annual sewer cleaning, it was discovered that the sewer line located on PCH between Gould Avenue and 24th Street had severe damage at one location. The line had eroded, causing a large fault under the roadbed next to a manhole. Several hundred feet of sewer pipe also need immediate attention. Due to the proposed Caltrans construction project on PCH through the South Bay, and particularly in Hermosa Beach, there is an immediate need to proceed with this sewer project prior to the start of the highway project in May. This project was advertised in the Easy Reader, Green Sheet (Construction News Reporter), Daily Construction Service and Bid America. The City Clerk received three bids by the closing date of august 5, 1999. The bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bid results are as follows: Bidder City Total Bid Amount 1. U -Liner Long Beach, CA $28,250 2. Insituform Santa Fe Springs, CA $49,100 3. Stanton Engineering Huntington Beach, CA $33,450 Analysis: Staff has reviewed the low bidder documents and has found them to be in order. Calls to references have been supportive of the contractor's work habits. Fiscal Impact: The FY 1999-00 budget provides for $135,000 for the construction and repair of manholes and the lining of sewer lines at various locations in account no. 160-8409- 4201. Upon the completion of this work, approximately $103,925 will be the balance of that account. Respectfully submitted, i- Darold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: 1 11P,60.11) Ste d. n 4.:ur ell City Manager f:\b95\pwfiles\ccitems\99-409 PCH at 24th sewer award of contract 3-22-00 2 • March 20, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 24, 2000 SUBJECT: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH — SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (S.C.A.G.) REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file this report. Background: Pursuant to State mandate, each local jurisdiction must accept its fair share of housing growth based upon growth projections provided by the State. Regional planning agencies are responsible for allocating this growth to local jurisdictions through a process known as the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prepares the RHNA for Southern California. The formula for growth allocations is based upon growth forecasts, vacancies, demolition and replacement construction. In April 1999 the RHNA process commenced. The City received a total new construction growth allocation of 332 dwelling units. Upon reviewing the allocations, staff prepared an appeal to SCAG contesting the allocation as unreasonable given the City's coastal location, land use patterns, existing density, existing level of growth and lot patterns. Staff also noted that the allocation was generally disproportionate to surrounding South Bay cities. Staff also asserted that multi family housing in the city is more like single family development in that it is typically comprised of two -on -a -lot condominiums. These factors presented in the appeal effectively preclude significant amounts of housing production. Analysis: The appeal was transmitted in August 1999 and a request for additional information was forward to SCAG in February 2000. A "meet and confer" session was conducted with other South Bay cities on March 10, 2000 to discuss the appeals of three jurisdictions, the cities of Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach and Gardenia. The South Bay cities agreed that the appeals had merit and that no housing growth redistribution to other local jurisdictions should occur if SCAG concurred with the appealing jurisdictions, however, SCAG staff did not concur and recommended that jurisdictions go forward with appeals. On March 16, 2000, staff presented an appeal to the Regional Housing Needs Appeals Subcommittee along with the cities of Manhattan Beach and Gardenia. The appeals for Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach were denied and the Gardenia appeal was tentatively approved based upon new more favorable replacement housing data submitted to the Subcommittee. The Subcommittee would only accept an appeal based upon the growth allocation formula and would not recognize any other important planning considerations such as city size, topography coastal location or land use distribution. The City has produced 158 new net dwelling units over the last decade. Based upon this level of growth it would take approximately 21 years to absorb the number of new units required by the allocation rather than the 7.5 year RHNA planning period. The result of the denial is that the City of Hermosa Beach has been allocated approximately 332 new housing units which must be reflected in the City's Housing Element, proposed for revision by December 2000. The Housing Element is required to be certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development and must contains goals, policies and implementation programs to attain the new housing growth allocated by SCAG and mandated by the State. Sol : lume felcf, Director Communit Development Department Concur: Stephen R. Bu City Manager Attachments: 1. Appeal Letter 1 City of Hermosa Beach Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeal Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Regional Housing Needs Appeals Subcommittee of the Community, Economic & Human Development Committee. There are six fundamental reasons why the City of Hermosa Beach isappealing the allocated construction need and housing growth rates proposed under the Regional Housing Needs Assessment. 1.City Size and Location The City is exceptionally small at 1 sq. mile of land area and .3 sq. miles of beach. It is one of the smallest cities in the region. There are not any areas of undeveloped land or large tracts of land available for rezoning to higher density to accommodate growth in the City. Hermosa Beach is comprised of small streets and limited infrastructure. City growth is limited to the west by the Coastal Zone requirements which preclude converting commercial visitor serving use to residential uses. High ground water in the coastal area precludes high density development with underground parking and hillside conditions to the east requires excessive grading to accommodate higher density projects. 2. Land Use Pattern The City does not have large commercial or industrial areas for rezoning to higher density residential development. 75% of the City is already residentially zoned with half of this area zoned for R-2 and R-3 development: 14% of the City has commercial zoning and 1% is industrially zoned. The balance or 10% of the City is zoned for open space which includes the City's beach area. The land use distribution of commercial and industrially zoned property is well below our neighboring cities in the South Bay and the region generally. So there are not significant amounts of alternative land uses which can be rezoned for high density residential development. This land use distribution precludes the provision of increased housing density in the City. 3. Density Hermosa Beach is already one of the most dense cities in Los Angeles County. We are currently built out at 15 dwelling units per acre which is by far the highest density in the South Bay and one of the highest densities in the region. Yet we are expected to accommodate a disproportionate share of growth --three times the number of housing units of our South Bay neighbor El Segundo and 1 1/2 times the dwelling units of Manhattan Beach based upon RHNA projections. We have compiled a list of the density of surrounding South Bay cities and the City of Hermosa Beach has virtually twice the density of the next most dense cities of Lawndale and Hawthorn, and up to fourteen times the density of many of our neighboring cities( Please see Attachment ) 4. Lot Pattern The lot pattern in the City discourages lot assembly to accommodate higher density even with rezoning. Residential lots are typically 30' x 100' and the City and Coastal Zone limit building height to 30' for multi family development. The typical project in the City is a two -on -a -lot condominium as virtually no property is assembled for higher 3 • • density which accounts for the low number of units developed per year (158 net units constructed over the last ten years). A 3000 sq. ft. lot yields no more than two units given the minimum unit size per lot and the City's development standards and parking requirements. Rezoning to higher density would have no affect on housing growth given the prevailing lot pattern. 5. Absorption of Growth Over the last decade only 158 housing units have been added to the housing stock. 416 new units and 258 units demolished. This represents annual growth of 15.8 units over a ten year period. At this rate it would take us over 22 years to absorb the RHNA allocated number. Importantly, most of this new construction has occurred over the last four year building boom which will not continue in the City due to the scarcity of developable sites and the cyclical nature of housing construction. 6. Methodology The City of Hermosa Beach objects to the methodology employed by SCAG which effectively assigns lower growth numbers and lower vacancies to cities with lower density development and higher growth and higher allocations and vacancies to cities which already have high density. Relative to allocated construction need— Hermosa has been allocated 332 new units, but our South Bay neighbors of El Segundo have only been allocated 78 and Manhattan Beach has only been allocated 250 units. These number are proportionally lower than Hermosa's given that each of these cities contains significantly more land area and vacant land for redevelopment and significantly larger lot size to accommodate higher density. We believe that our allocated growth number should be 119 based upon our actual growth numbers over the 7.5 year planning period and our total construction need should be 222 units rather than 332 as indicated in our RHNA allocation. Relative to ideal vacancy rates - The City does not dispute the proportions of single and multi family development used in the calculation. Rather we dispute the assumption that our multifamily development has significantly higher vacancy. Virtually all of the new development is two -on -a -lot condominiums typically 2000 square feet. These units should be classified single family with respect to the ideal vacancy calculation since they are larger owner occupied units. Based upon our calculations approximately 500 of the 4,947 units identified as multi family should be reclassified for vacancy calculation purposes as single family, and our ideal vacancy number should be 300 rather than 319 as suggested in our RHNA allocation. Therefore based on the unique conditions discussed above and in detail in our appeal letters of August 1999 and February 2000, we request that you reevaluate our allocated construction need, vacancy and housing growth rates. We feel these matters warrant reconsideration as the City cannot absorb the proposed growth given its land area, land use distribution and pattern of development. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council e--`4 /a, IV . /2 ch 22, 2000 Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-5 — APPEAL CONTINUED FROM MARCH 14, 2000 MEETING LOCATION: 36 PIER AVENUE APPELLANT: ZEPPY'S PIZZA 36 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT. Planning Commission Recommendation To sustain the_,Commission's decision to deny the request for beer and wine. Background At their meeting of January 18, 2000, the Planning Commission considered the subject request and a motion to approve the project failed on a 2:3 vote with the Commission citing concerns about the saturation of the downtown area with alcohol establishments and finding no rationale for an additional establishment. A resolution for denial was approved at the subsequent Planning Commission meeting of February 15, 2000. Staff's recommendation was to approve the C.U.P. subject to standard conditions of approval, including a condition to obtain a Parking Plan for the use of outdoor seating for outdoor dining in connection with a restaurant. PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: C-2, Restricted Commercial GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial LOT SIZE: 2,850 Square Feet TOTAL AREA OF ESTABLISHMENT: 1,005 Square Feet PARKING: None ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically Exempt Zeppy's has been in operation primarily as a take-out restaurant at this location since May, 1998. The previous uses were also take-out restaurants. Analysis The applicant is requesting permission to offer on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with the existing restaurant, which will change the function of the business from primarily take-out to a full service sit-down restaurant. The applicant is proposing minor interior modifications to the i floor plan to accommodate two required bathrooms, with no further changes to the indoor or outdoor seating areas. The attached alternative resolution of approval contains the currently applicable standard conditions for on -sale restaurants including a condition regarding hours of operation, typical among neighboring downtown restaurants with on -sale alcohol, from 7:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M (Club Sushi, Italy's Little Kitchen, Sushi Sei, Brewski's, Sangria). The C.U.P. is the first step for the applicant towards obtaining approval for an on -sale license. The State A.B.C. will also review this application in accordance with their standards, and may require a City Council finding of public convenience and necessity before issuing a license. OUTDOOR SEATING The restaurant has been using the outdoor area in front of the restaurant for outdoor seating in accordance with the encroachment permit granted by the City Public Works Department. Recently the outdoor seating area was changed from benches/tables for take-out food, to a defined dining area to comply with Public Works Department standards. This outdoor seating area, however, was never authorized as complying with parking requirements for additional dining area, and the proposed change to provide beer and wine service will change the function of the business from primarily a take out restaurant to sit down dining. The Lower Pier Avenue Parking Plan for outdoor dining, and Coastal Development Permit was limited to specific locations on Lower Pier Avenue which did not include this location (see the attached map which shows the authorized locations). To obtain compliance with parking requirements for the outdoor dining, City approval of a Parking Plan, and a Coastal Development Permit is required. The applicant has indicated he will proceed with obtaining these approvals should the C.U.P. be granted. CONCUR: "011 '1 Sol Blumefe ld, 1 irector Community `Development Department Robe son Associate Planner Attachments 1. Draft Resolution to sustain the Commission's denial 2. Alternative Resolution of approval 3. P.C. Minutes / Resolution 4. Location Map 5. Map of authorized locations for outdoor dining 2 To Sustain P.C. Denial RESOLUTION 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION, ON APPEAL, TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT Section 1. An application was filed by Zeppy's Pizza, seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit for on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for the Conditional Use Permit on January 18, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Based on the evidence, and the finding that the downtown district is already saturated with alcohol establishment, the Commission denied the requested Conditional Use Permit Section 3. The applicant filed an appeal of the Commission's decision. Section 4. The City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the appeal on March 28, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 5. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The subject restaurant is primarily take out, and occupies approximately 1,005 square feet, with a small seating area, and is proposed to be remodeled to accommodate male and female bathroom facilities, and beer and wine service to change the intensity of the use from primarily take-out to a full service sit down restaurant. 2. The site is zoned C-2, restricted Commercial allowing restaurant uses, and on -sale beer and wine with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 6. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The change to add on -sale beer and wine changes the focus and intensity of the existing take-out restaurant. 2. The downtown area is already saturated with drinking establishments, and no rationale has been provided to add another such establishment. • • Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the City Council sustains the decision of the Planning Commission and hereby denies the Conditional Use Permit. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of March by the following vote: AYES: NOES:' ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR PROTEM of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Alternative Resolution to Approve C.U.P. RESOLUTION 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT Section 1. An application was filed by Zeppy's Pizza, seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit for on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for the Conditional Use Permit on January 18, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Based on the evidence, and the finding that the downtown district is already saturated with alcohol establishment, the Commission denied the requested Conditional Use Permit. Section 3. The applicant filed an appeal of the Commission's decision. Section 4. The City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the appeal on March 28, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 5. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The subject restaurant space is approximately 1,005 square feet, with a small seating area, and is being remodeled to accommodate male a female bathroom facilities. 2 The site is zoned C-2, restricted Commercial allowing restaurant uses, and on -sale beer and wine with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 6. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The site is zoned C-2, and is suitable for the proposed use with the proposed amendment; 2. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding commercial and residential uses; 3. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties; 4. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303c of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 . 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves the Conditional Use Permit subject to the following Conditions of Approval; 1. The project shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans as reviewed by the City Council on March 14, 2000. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director 2. The business must process a Parking Plan to accommodate outdoor dining pursuant to Section 17.44.210 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. 4. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 5. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business and in the parking areas. 6. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists, and may authorize the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem, and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the Commission. 8. The exterior of all the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 9. Any significant changes to the interior layout which would alter the primary function of the business as a restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 10. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. Section 8. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 6 Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or 'employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property, shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other, regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of March by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR PROTEM of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION METING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON FEBRUARY 15, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meting was called to order by Chairman Perrotti at 7:08 p.m. Commsioner Hoffman led the pledge of allegiance. Roll Call Present: Co ' sioners Hoffman, Pizer, Schwartz, Chairman Perrotti Absent: Vice -Cha b Ketz Also Present: Sol Blumen ., Community Development Director Michael Schuba ' . City Planner Diane Cleary, Reco •.'ng Secretary CONSENT CALENDAR Chairman Perrotti corrected the opening and close the January 18, 2000 minutes. f the public hearings on pages 5 and 7 of Director Blumenfeld noted the correct sp ling of Bill Graw 2000 minutes. pages 7 and 8 of the January 18, MOTION by Commission-. offman, seconded by Commissioner Pi , to APPROVE the January 18, 2000 minute . s amended: AYES: H. ' an, Schwartz, Pizer, Chairman Perrotti NOES: one ABSENT- Vice -Chair Ketz ABS : None 5. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION a. RESOLUTION P.C. 00-7 — DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVENUE, ZEPPY'S PIZZA. Director Blumenfeld indicated that a formal Resolution is necessary to clarify the Commission's action prior to City Council's consideration on the applicant's appeal. He said staff has attached a draft resolution, with draft findings, to formally deny the request. P.C. Minutes 02-15-00 3 • • MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Schwartz, to ADOPT Resolution P.C. 00-7 to deny a Conditional Use Permit for on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant at 36 Pier Avenue. AYES: Hoffinan, Schwartz, Pizer NOES: Chairman Perrotti ABSENT: Vice -Chair Ketz ABSTAIN: None 6. ORAL/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Roger C ighton questioned the allowance of a caretaker's unit in mini storage facilitie n Hermosa B ch. Director Blume eld stated that the Body Glove property owner requested that t. - City consider adding caretaker's . 't to the permitted use list but withdrew the request. The .roject has been issued a building pe t, and the plans have been approved for the mini sto : ge facility. He clarified that the text . ndment has not been approved for a caretaker's • 't. He also indicated that the project across the eet from City Hall differs from the Body ove property as it is a legal nonconforming project, . d the owner is submitting plans and 11 obtain a building permit to provide the unit. Pete Tucker, 235 34th Street, Hermo : Beach, stated the Co . it approved the project, 4 The Strand, a few months ago denied by the Commission. He xpressed concern that this project should not have been issued a building pe •. 't and may • - in violation of the Uniform Building Code. Director Blumenfeld indicated that the building . orms to the Building Code requirements of openings within 3 feet of a property line on th- ort side of the property, and also conforms to the requirement of openings adjacent a publ. way or a treet. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. CON 99-30/PDP 99-36/V DEVELOPMENT PL FOR A CONVERS CONDOMINIU 1140 MONTE DECEMBE R 99-7 — CONDITIONAL AND VESTING TENTAT N OF AN EXISTING DUPLEX IN AND VARIANCE TO THE 30' HEIGHT Y BOULEVARD (CONTINUED FROM NO 1999 AND JANUARY 18, 2000 MEETINGS). E PERMIT, PRECISE ARCEL MAP #25678 A TWO -UNIT IMIT AT 1136 — MBER 16, Staff Recomme • ed Action: To continue to March 21, 2000 meeting. Director Bl enfeld explained that the applicant is requesting to continue the project fo the last time to t March 21, 2000 meeting. Ch. an Perrotti opened the public hearing. P.C. Minutes 02-15-00 missioner Hoffman agreed. Commissio - Schwartz also agreed and sees no problem, especially since the studeare precluded from . ' ing. She also pointed out that the parking lot is generally n• 11. Commissioner Pizer agree • ' would be acceptable and is a daytime u < ith a balancing use of the parking facility. Chairman Perrotti also'said that the shopp not see a problem with the parking. MOTION by Commissioner Pizer and s 99-7 — Parking Plan for a communi chool without providin Boulevard. center du g the day is generally empty, and he does nded by Co-'ssioner Hoffman to APPROVE PARK ditional parking at 1103 Aviation AYES: Hoff , Schwartz, Pizer, Vice -Chair Ketz, Chairman Perrotti NOES: ABSENT: None ABST None 12. CUP 99-5 — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVENUE, ZEPPY'S PIZZA. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report. He reported that the restaurant has been using the outdoor area in front of the restaurant for outdoor seating in accordance with the encroachment permit granted by the City Public Works Department. Recently, the outdoor seating area was changed from benches/tables for take-out, to a defined dining area. This seating, however was never authorized as complying with parking requirements for additional dining area, and the proposed change to serve beer and wine service likely will change the function of the seating to dining and longer term use. To obtain compliance with parking requirements for the outdoor dining, City approval of a Parking Plan, and a coastal Development Permit is required. Bill Groft, 2507 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, stated that there would be no increase on the interior except for an additional bathroom based on the new laws. He said they have an encroachment permit and will comply with staff's recommendations. He also said that the seating in front of someone else's establishment has been corrected. He pointed out that since they have been opened, they have had an excellent track record. They began by remodeling the building and participating in the beautification project of Downtown. The have maintained one of the highest health scores in the area, and the business is an asset to the community and a model business. He further indicated that they employee local high school children, sponsor sport teams, participate in all of the Hermosa Beach events and donate to the fund raisers. He said he is applying for the CUP due to customer /o P.C. Minutes 01-18-00 responses and needs. He also stated that he was born and raised in Hermosa Beach and went to Mira Costa High. School, and he runs the business. Commissioner Hoffman asked about the encroachment in front of the Treasure Chest. Mr. Groft said one of their goals was to make the establishment handicap accessible, and the tables chosen were large. The Treasure Chest agreed that the tables could remain in front of their establishment and a fence was built based on what was there. Everything has been corrected, however, with the fence being moved back. Chairman Perrotti noticed that during the summer months their sign has been out too far. Mr. Groff said this will be corrected. Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. Commissioner Schwartz feels that the drinking establishments in downtown are becoming excessive, and she does not see the rationale to add another establishment. Commissioner Pizer agreed. Commissioner -Hoffman pointed out that the change is very fundamental in the nature of the operation, and by just adding the beer and wine license, makes it an eat in restaurant as opposed to a primarily take out type of establishment. He remembers Zeppy's Pizza as a place to get a slice of pizza and walk back to the beach. Vice -Chair Ketz indicated that the restaurant is small with a few tables, and she does not see a problem with adding the beer and wine due to its location. Chairman Perrotti asked if beer and wine were approved at the location and the owners moved, would new owners have rights to beer and wine at the location. Director Blumenfeld responded yes. Chairman Perrotti agrees with Vice -Chair Ketz and does not have a problem with beer and wine at the establishment. He also noted that Mr. Lissner submitted a letter opposing beer and wine and 2 a.m. hours. MOTION by Vice -Chair Ketz and seconded by Chairman Perrotti to APPROVE CUP 99-5 — Conditional Use Permit for on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with an existing restaurant at 36 Pier Avenue, Zeppy's Pizza. AYES: Vice -Chair Ketz, Chairman Perrotti NOES: Hoffman, Schwartz, Pizer ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None P.C. Minutes 01-18-00 P.C. RESOLUTION 00-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AT 36 PIER AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT Section 1. An application was filed by Zeppy's Pizza, seeking approval for on - sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant; Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for the Conditional Use Permit on January 18, 2000, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The subject restaurant space is approximately 1,005 square feet, with a small seating area, and is being remodeled to accommodate male and female bathroom facilities. 2. The site is zoned C-2, Restricted Commercial allowing restaurant uses, and on - sale beer and wine with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan: 1. The change to add on -sale beer and wine changes the focus and intensity of the existing take-out restaurant. 2. The downtown area is already saturated with drinking establishments, and no rationale has been provided to add another such establishment. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby denies the Conditional Use Permit. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Hoffman,Pizer,Schwartz NOES: Chmn.Perrotti ABSENT: Comm.Ketz ABSTAIN: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 00-7 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of February 15, 2000. Sam Perrotti, Chairman Sol Blume eld, Secretary Date 13TH ST. 4103- an. JO O ` 8 30 JO r-4as I / JO .. • • • 14 • 15 • JO O 16 � JO ZZ7 17 nI JO \ 18 •, w .90 1 9 20 31 � Q21 1 b 19 1 Q 30 I `\O 1% 3 p-1 !o 140.1 1 v t/lOiw. bo crrY !N / ® CITY BLK 2 ars 13 CITY J0 J0 I J0 I! J0 • •. JO roti/ JO .ass as s0 1 9 20 31 � Q21 22 23 24 25 1 26 28 •.19 •'20• 21 ''• 1 4''25'A26".2704 36 � • 30 • J0 • JC • • JO 13 J JO f If NS JO 0 • lom KALE r - 100' 4187- o©s 41g7 oa4- Jo 14 8 °' .1:71/..® t7s ..•.- - 15 10 0110Te0 - 11 •. •• 1947r !Sim 14 i 1 2:471 30 43 0 JO /O' c® tr)co x'18 •.19 •'20• 21 ''• 22'•23' 4''25'A26".2704 36 - . . • • 30 c 24 4 JO 0 • lom KALE r - 100' 4187- o©s 41g7 oa4- Jo 14 8 °' .1:71/..® t7s ' 9 3o - 15 10 0110Te0 - 11 • 14 12 ® BLK. Jo 16 13 a II Jo 1947r !Sim 14 i 1 2:471 Jo 15 © JO 10 S 16 JO 14 17 0 30 le 411 40 • CT. $ -224.YQ 18 19111 1. IIJ7• 244 � 20 o 30 2l0; 21 ?"'"FE /e. ' -22 4®� ► r - 423 e 24 ® 24� 25 30 7r 26 PIA 90 27 © 30 !! 2e e Pao 30 r '' 294 JO 1 4I87.00.}- 0 ST. 50 PIER AVE. % r ONTINENTAL MAPPING . SERVICE 6325 VAN NUYS BLVD. VAN NUYS, 91401 (818) 787-1663 1 - II.11, • 11i j7 la •••••.• ask CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENCROACH M . 12' INTO PlID171C KOliAh.MAXIMUM, LOWER PIER OUTDOOR DINING PLAN • • OUTDOOR DINING APPROVED LOCATIONS LOWER PIER AVENUE Pier Avenue Address Business Name Frontage Estimated Square Feet* South Side 8 Hennessey's Tavern 60 600 20 Hermosa Fishmarket Cafe 30 240** 22 The Beach Club 30 240** 30 The Lighthouse 30 300 50A Patrick Malloys 33 336 52 Aloha Sharkeez 30 300 68 Sangria 60 600 North Side 19 Cantina Real 24 168** 37 Downtown Bakery Cafe 14 108 39 Il Boccaccio 19 168 73 Brewski's 30 300 Total: 3360 *Assuming an actual 12 foot depth of dining area, and subtracting out a 5'X12' area for aisle clearance. **Located on corner of Pier and Beach Drive requiring a 5' setback from Beach Drive, thus reducing dining area an additional 5' X 12' DEC 16 LOW. DEV. ger Proposed Condition Use Permit Modification for: Zeppy7 s Pizza 36 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 IP ,_ .4., .. ; . , ! _--IL"--- -,.----i_-_ . - - 7 = i • • „ , - i -.T„, f .„. a ' A' - ,,, \ k 11 1! 1 ZEPPTS PIZZA PEP AVENUE LOT II LIGHTHOUSE 6 PIER AVENUE TREASURE 1 CHEST . \ 51 I 1 19 IIN , i -, = zexpy's lz , __ _ , . 4 ,,,,. .. 4,-„, ......, ..... .< ,_ ....„ ,,,,, ,, ,,,,_ i ‘11. , 12114 COURT ,„, 11 , ...4 '911 : - * 9 ' ' *." ", ' 1 ,*" _ ..... ,. RR R a"- " i , ' .` -.• • ......,;,„ ,... . •-- :-...sisso.-- 1I --, / --,- 1 1 1 / EXISTRIO Lc'r— PAR INS \ 1 I 1 I IITH STREET .. - I I NORTH TITLE EXISTING ELEVATION AT PIER AVENUE' (4) PLOT AND SITE PLAN A ve•ro. l, r•szecALE-r OWNER Zeppy's Pizza Ph: (310) 798-6585 36 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Contact : Bill Grow ARCHITE-CT: John D. Rees, Architect Ph: 13101 937-2299 565 25th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Contact : John Roes Email: JRReesHBOworldnet.ott.net PIER AVENUE PIER AVENUE '1 NO'1%, EXISTING PUBLIC .4e‘' ao,o. PATIO ON WORKS PILE WITH DEC 1 6 COM. DEV. 1 • PROJECT DIRECTORY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, Block 12, Hermosa Beach Traci SCOPE OF WORK '-----1 1. Add an addticaal HC accessible redrawn. 1. Add a HC urkial to the sodding tic restroom TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: ____..„- I-1 , _.— , , 1-1 . \ SEA11NO_/1 Bann° ZEPPY'S III m MI w_ -111 L II ri i EXISTING ZEPPY'S II LI EXISTING DINING am LI LI COOl. E ii L I-1 I—I Type V -N AREA CALCULATIONS ZEPPY'S PIZZA: Existing Overd 1,035 SF. interior Dining Area 110 SF. SEATING L I L. EXISTING SHIRT _ an 1,005 S.P. TALES' CLOTHING SHOP I REMOVE PORTION or EXISTING COUNTER RELOCATED DOOR AND HARDWARE NEW URINAL EXISTINO_MENS iffroILET NEW DOOR HARDWARE AND L.. PROJECT DESCRIPTION , CLR ,_ • , ,," _ f,:r.'• .A....‘7,7rM , e.,.... ? V , ,..... -'5:1 , R . , -. ' - , --'''''' '-'-'....- `...x \ OP 1 • \s`s ; s ....iz ,., -,,-1- - • -It , • .• '. .4°.,-Q,a,i-, • ....-0,,,..--'1VAV k ''''''. 'Nc;',. 4::23,- v „ , NORTH L . rgalEl ELECTRICAL PANEL ....", /... II -..----- REMOVE WALLS „ 1 ill I , I . . NMI . , . RELOCATED NEW WATER HAND SINK CLOSET i- AND -HC -ACCESSORIES - - It! _J r i I i i__. ___I . RELOCATED " VI. l°19 46 r• IP. I i NEW OPENING TO PREP AREA • r WNO I s I =. L jr_-1L L RELOCATE M I J Li -LJ DOORS L i RELOCATE EQUIPMENT MOP SINK _ \21tVIVIe'46 RELOCATED EQUIPENT PER OWNERS DIRECTION FSPTTAGEA 4P RO 1:990 i - - , _ - I , - Ci) NORTH 1 _crsr[N0 PARKING LOT 6 — NORTH VICINITY MAP EXISTING PLAN FOR REFERENCE 64ALE .... NEW FLOOR, FURNITURE, PARKING AND ACCESSIBILITY PLAN SCALE .C\ N.:, j vc.,-., 1/4.. )99 PT. 0 Proposed Courtyard Awdlg Zeppy's Pizza 36 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 C.U.P. SUBMTTAL Dote 11/14/90 Dr..' J. Ross Scabs Pm- Plon Job Sheet Al PotS March 16, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 2000 COMMERCIAL EVENT APPLICATIONS Recommendation The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council: 1. Approve the slate of special events as listed below. 2. Approve the attached event contracts. EVENT 1. Beach Bash 2000 —11\4G 2. Southern California Rugby Football - Makai Events 3. 9ch Annual Hermosa Beach Triathlon - MESP DAlE FEES (estimated) June 8-11 July 29-30 October 8 $ 36,806.00 $ 7,250.00 $ 8,068.00 Note: Complete applications and event information are available for public review at: 1. Hermosa Beach Police Station 2. Hermosa Beach City Manager's Office 3. Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Office Background The City received applications for three commercial events on the beach. Each applicant paid the City a $500 deposit as required by the special event policy. These events were reviewed and approved by the Commission at their February 1, and March 7, 2000 meetings. Attachment A provides the Commission with a grid that identifies (a) years each commercial event has been held in the City, (b) proposed event dates, and (c) projected City fees. Attachment B includes: (a) a description for each proposed event and special issues, (b) event applications, (c) site maps, and (d) event contracts. Analysis The attached contracts and policies have been developed by the City through several years of experience in staging commercial events. The City and event operators have worked together through the years in order to consider the needs of residents, and to account for potential opportunities for local businesses in the assembly and conduct of these events. 1 • • Not only have special events provided local residents and visitors with an opportunity to enjoy world class sporting and cultural events, they have also given the downtown area commerce and media exposure as a result of their existence here. IMG: BEACH BASH 2000 As identified in Attachment A, IMG's set-up encompasses seven days (tear -down is three days). It is important to note that the work will be suspended or minimal on the weekend (June 3-4) in order to accommodate weekend beach activities. This set-up time is required to create the unique venue inclusiveof the "soul bowl." The event will be the summer's largest and will replace the AVP's event originally scheduled for August. The City hosted the first Beach Bash in 1999.. As an inaugural event, it was considered a success both from a program and operations standpoint. Since this event is of larger magnitude than most commercial events, Police and Community Resources staff conducted an additional meeting prior to the submission of this application in order to discuss last year's operations and to identify areas that can be improved for Beach Bash 2000. This summer's site plan differs from 1999. Specifically, the evening concerts will be staged on the beach, south of the Pier (last year they were on the Plaza) to provide more room for spectators. A half -pipe and street course will be added to the soul bowl for the extreme sports competitions. A sandcastle building event will be added (south of the Pier) which will include professional displays. In addition to Beach Bash, the City has worked with IMG on prior events including a Beach Volleyball Qualifier for the 1996 Olympics. As one of the largest sports agencies in the world, they have the resources and experience to present events that are professionally presented, reflecting positively on the City and sponsors alike. Per the attached application, the fiscal impact of this event on the City is realized with hotel bookings, parties, and donations to local charities. MAKAI EVENTS: RUGBY TOURNEY The Southern California second annual "7s in the Sand" Rugby Tournament (Makai) is recreational and as such, the contract does not focus on impacts from large spectator crowds. Makai abided by its contractual requirements last year and presented a successful and safe event in Henniosa Beach. Hundreds of players seemed to enjoy the uniqueness of the beach tourney and spectators enjoyed the display. There were some minor operational issues that need to be addressed for the 2000 event including: (a) requiring City approval of all signs prior to the event and (b) ensuring that Sunday's event and tear -down is coordinated with Sunset Concerts on the Beach (City event). MESP: 9th ANNUAL HERMOSA BEACH TRIATHLON The 9th Annual Hermosa Beach Triathlon (MESP) is a repeat event for the City. The event is participant intensive and as such, the contract also does not focus on impacts from large spectator crowds. The race route and safety issues are thoroughly reviewed by City staff prior to and following each race to refine operations as necessary to improve the event. 2 MESP has abided by all contractual requirements in past years and has presented successful and safe events in Hermosa Beach and other locales. Once the Council approves the event contracts, staff will schedule operations meetings with event organizers and representatives from Police, Fire, Public Works, and Community Resources to finalize safety and operational requirements. Special events have long been part of the beach culture in Hermosa Beach. The City has been fortunate to work in partnership with competent event operators through the years in order to ensure that these events are safe and successful to the betterment of the City, the business community, and residents who enjoy watching and participating in these activities. 2000 Commercial events Fiscal Impact: $52,124 revenue to the General Fund— $21,796 of the $52,124 pays for direct costs and city overhead charges. Attachments: A: City of Hermosa Beach: 2000 Commercial Event Grid B: Event descriptions, applications, site plans, contract C: City's Special Event Policy D: 2000 Tentative Special Event Calendar (includes City and community events) Respectfully Submitted, Mary 4: • :ney Co unity Resources Director Conc delta) Burrel Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director NOT AVAILABLE Russ Tingley Fire Chie Val Straser Police Chief CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: 2000 COMMERCIAL EVENTS APPLICANT IMG Makai Events MESP EVENT/YEAR California Sports Beach Festival 2"d Year Southern California Rugby Tournament 2nd Year Hermosa Beach Triathlon 9th Year DATES/ LOCATION June 8, 9,10,11 Beach/Plaza July 29, 30 Beach October 8 Beach/Plaza SET-UP May 30, 31 June 1, 2, , June5,6,7 July 28 October 7 TEAR -DOWN June 12,13,14 July 30 October 8 CATEGORY III II II REQUESTING ADMISSION CHARGES? No No No SHUTTLE BUS REQUIRED Yes No No INSURANCE 2 Million 2 Million 2 Million FILMING? Yes No No SEASON Summer Summer Off -Season FEES (EST): Permit Set-up/Tear Down Police Fire/Paramedic CR Staff Admission Film Permit Location Fees Business Lic. Banner Co -Sponsor Parking . Amp. Permit TOTAL $ 13,952.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 14,040.00 $ 1,664.00 $ 800.00. . $ N/A $ 349.00 $ 3,256.00 $ 274.00 $ 430.00 $ N/A $ ' N/A $ . 41.00 $ 3,837.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,040.00 $ N/A $ 600.00 $ N/A $ N/A $ N/A $ 274.00 $ 430.00 $ 500.00 $ 128.00 $ 41.00 $ 1918.00 $ 400.00 $ 3,452.00 $ N/A $ 200.00 $ N/A $ N/A $ N/A $ 69.00 $ N/A $ 200.00 $ 1,776.00. $ 41.00 $ 36,806.00 $ 7,250.00 $ 8,068.00 1-24-2000: Attachment A H .L "n: y':� S..tl`_SW.caapnC•- x �•:.,-'4 �'%fKr!r:� y.' U*Y 7 :': t"." Title Sponsor Mervyns, California Event Description A 4 -Day Sports and music festival that includes: > 4 days of professional men's and women's volleyball. Equal prize money for both the women and men's tourney. > 3 days of extreme sports competition (bicycle stunts, inline skating and skateboarding). > 2 afternoon/early evening concerts. > This event will be taped for national television. > Bleachers accommodate 2,400. > Spectator day crowds each -5,000. > AVP will participate in the volleyball component of this event instead of holding August event. > Women's event will be sponsored by TBD. Issues / Changes from previous years > May need to change staging areas due to pier construction. > Concerts will require City approval (review date April 25, 2000). > Adding staging for the half -pipe, street course and sandcastle building. > Staff needs to approve safety plan for spectators for street course. Set-up and tear down dates reduced from 1999. Total City Fees (estimated) $36,806.00 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 Fax (310) 372-4333 Organization's Name: .r.:.• .w• • .�ii8l2 r�C:: .01010 A International Management Group (IMG) Profit Yes Non profit Address: 11755 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 850 • Non profit ID City: Los Angeles State CA ZIP 90025 Phone: • (310) 473-0411 Fax (31.0) 473-3914 • Contact Person/Title: ,James Leitz / Vice .President Address: Same as Above City: - State ZIP. Day Phone: Brief description of event: Eve Picone A four day sports and music festival that includ *Four days of professional men's and women's volleyball * Thr -- - U - 111• OH.' . . * TwO afternoon / early evening concerts. s a e:oarft ng Dates of Event: June 8 11, 2000 Location of Event: Set up /Tear down Time 8; Dates: On the beach - north of the pier, Please refer to attached production schedule Time Event will begin: 9 AM Time event will end: 6 PM (See attached schedule for more details) Number of Participants (including volunteers): Anticipated number of spectators: • 200 Thursday - 1,000 Friday - 1, 500 Saturday - 2,50 Sunday - 3,000 Total estimated attendance: 8-10,000 • Number of Vehicles/Trucks: Pending site layout approval - We would like to place one office trailer (38'.) near the site May30 - June 14 Description. of Set up for this event: Please refer to attached production schedule. Additional information/requests: Application Fee Permit Fee Film. Setup/Tear-down Co-sponsors Amplification Permit Banner(s) Police Fire Public Works Parking Other Costs Total Due $500 Lam- L JJ 1 ilU ! V • JJ no. 11i:V e2/7.999 08:49 37243 • Insurance Regtlircd: LAA ,d1U Ca 1 Y UI- titiirl Yes No Received 1 Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furni*b the City of Hermosa Beach evidence or t2 minion comprehensive general liability insurance in the fofln of a certificate, cornering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees .as additional Insured.• Permittee waives claims' against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, and employees, for fres or damages caused, arising out of or in any way connected with the rercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICANTS LAWS yiND. TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE, INFORMATION CON7'AIIJED HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT 70 TBE BEST OF MY K&OW,L,EDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND OR FURNIS-IED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMIStJNITY .RESOURCES AS UTUALLYAGREED TO BY PARriES Permit to be processed through City Council YES NO Department of Coni unity Resources Police Dcpartmenti Fire Department Date • Date. D ate s. z Irorr Beach Bash 2000 SPORTS, MUSIC & ACTIVITIES CALENDAR Thursday, June 8 Friday, June 9 Saturday, June 10 Sunday, June 11 Men's & Women's Volleyball x Men's Volleyball Qualifier Tournament x Junior's Volleyball Clinic with Gabrielle Reece Soul Bowl x Bicycle Stunt Warm-up x Aggressive Inline Warm-up x Skateboarding Warm-up Men's & Women's Volleyball x Men's Hermosa Beach Open x BVA Women's Pro Beach Open Soul Bowl x Bicycle Stunt Preliminary Rounds x Aggressive Inline Preliminary Rounds x Skateboarding Preliminary Rounds Summer Stage (4:00 - 6::30pm) x Local Band(s) Men's & Women's Volleyball x Men's Hermosa Beach Open x BVA Women's Pro Beach Open Soul Bowl x Bicycle Stunt Finals x Aggressive Inline Finals x Skateboarding Finals Surfing x Pro/Celeb Long Board Summer Stage (4:00 - 6:30pm) x National Band(s) Men's & Women's Volleyball x Men's Hermosa Beach Open x BVA Women's Pro Beach Open Soul Bowl x Pro Expression Session Surfing x Pro/Celeb Long Board Summer Stage (5:00-7:OOpm) x National Band(s) err/ Beach Bash 2000 OVERVIEW Hermosa Beach will host the second annual Beach Bash 2000, June 8th — 11t". Mervyn's California proudly celebrates the California lifestyle through this four-day sports and music festival. The world's top performers in beach volleyball, extreme sports, surfing and music will gather to entertain and honor a continuing custom of fun in the sun. Volleyball: Beach Bash 2000 will feature today's top men's and women's beach volleyball players in the AVP's Hermosa Beach Open and the BVA Women's Pro Beach Open. A pro athlete/celebrity match will also be televised in a unique team format. Extreme Sports: Beach Bash 2000 will feature professional skateboarding, aggressive inline skating and bicycle stunt competition in the one -of -a -kind "Soul Bowl." Surfing: The epitome of the California lifestyle, Beach Bash 2000 will showcase Pro-Celeb long board surfing in the waves off the Hermosa Pier. Live Music: Creating a soundtrack for today's lifestyle sports and entertaining thousands of fans, national acts will be featured on the Pier Avenue "Summer Stage." Festival Grounds: An interactive festival area will include sponsor displays, sampling pavilion, live music, sweepstakes, athlete autograph area and more. Unlike most pro sporting events or touring music properties, Beach Bash 2000 offers an associationwith a variety of lifestyle sports, as well as exposure and consumer interaction. Highlighted by national television on FOX Sports Net, the festival epitomizes the sports, music and essence of California. We invite you to read on and find out more about this exciting event .. . BEACH BASH PRODUCTION SCHEDULE SITE: Hermosa Beach, CA — On the beach, North of the Pier IMPACT DATES: Tuesday, May 30 through Wednesday, June 14 > SET-UP: May 30 — June 2 & June 5 — 7 (7 Days) > COMPETITION: June 8 —11 (4 Days) • TEAR DOWN: June 12 -14 (3 Days) OPERATIONS SCHEDULE — SET-UP May 30 — June 2, June 5 - 7 (8AM-8PM) 1. Tuesday, May 30 *Trucks to enter Strand via 10t Street & exit via 14th Street. Staff & signage will direct Strand foot traffic to alley behind Beach House/Good Stuff/Mermaid. 2. Wednesday, May 31 3. Thursday, June 1 Beach is leveled (Early AM) Volleyball courts are removed (Early AM) Receive Office Trailer (Pier) Unload IMG Production Truck Grandstand Truck Arrives (10:00 AM) Unload Grandstand Trucks Unload Stadium Steel Measure Site & layout Receive Generator Receive Tractor Unload Grandstand Trucks Unload Stadium Steel Unload IMG Production Truck Bleacher Construction Stadium Construction Extreme Sports Arena Construction Receive Dumpster (11t Street) Grandstand Truck Arrives (8:00 AM) _ Extreme Arena Truck Arrives (8:00 AM) Unload Trucks Unload Stadium Steel Bleacher Construction Stadium Construction Extreme Sports Arena Construction Perimeter Fencing OPERATIONS — SET-UP (Cont'd) May 30 — June 2, June 5 - 7 (8 AM — 8 PM) 4. Friday, June 2 Bleacher Construction Stadium Construction Extreme Sports Arena Construction Perimeter Fencing 5. Saturday, June 3 NO TRUCKS Organizing, Cleaning, Security 6. Sunday, June 4 NO TRUCKS Organizing, Cleaning, Security 7. Monday, June 5 Finish Grandstand Construction Finish Extreme Arena Construction Finish Stadium Construction Receive Rental Equip. (Tables, Chairs, etc.) Dumpster Empty / Exchange Stadium Interior — Scrim Tent Install TV Towers Carpentry Outer Courts Finish Perimeter Fencing 8. Tuesday, June 6 AVP Truck (Unload Only — No Parking) Stadium Court Signage (IMG / ANC) Stadium Scoreboards (AVP) Carpentry Banners / Flags - Sound Finish Tents Furniture Install Stickers on Soul Bowl f • OPERATIONS — SET-UP (Cont'd) 9. Wednesday, June 7 PRE -EVENT COMPETITION EVENT SCHEDULE — (See Attached For Details) Thursday, June 8 Friday, June 9 Saturday, June 10 Sunday, June 11 OPERATIONS SCHEDULE — TEAR DOWN 13. Sunday, June 11 14. Monday, June 12 0 May 30 — June 2, June 5 - 7 (8 AM-8PM) Banners Finish Carpentry Outer Court Banners (AVP) Scoreboards — Outer Courts (AVP) Media Set-up Parking Perimeter Toilets Install Inflatables Position TV Truck (Pad South of Pier) TV Set -Up — Power, Run Cable June 8 BVA Women's Qualifier (South of Pier) June 8 —11 (9 AM — 6 PM) Volleyball, Extreme Sports V -Ball, Extreme, Concert V -Ball, Extreme, Concert V -Ball, Extreme, Concert June 11-14(7 AM -6 PM) Outer Courts, Vendors (5 PM — 7 PM) Grandstand Dismantle (5 PM - 7 PM) TV Truck Leaves ? - AVP Truck or early on Monday Grandstand Truck #1 Arrives (6:30 AM) Load Grandstand Truck (7 - 10 AM) Vendors Breakdown Outer Courts (AVP) Remove Banners & Scrim Grandstand Dismantle Stadium & TV Tower Dismantle Extreme Sports Arena Dismantle Load Stadium Steel (Late Afternoon / Eve) Load Grandstand Truck (Evening) • OPERATIONS- TEAR DOWN (Cont'd) June 11-14 (7 AM — 6 PM) 14. Tuesday, June 13 15. Wednesday, June 14 Grandstand Truck #2 Arrives (6:30 AM) Load Grandstand Truck (7 -10 -AM) Grandstand Dismantle Stadium Dismantle Extreme Sports Arena Dismantle Load Stadium Steel (All Day) Grandstand Truck #3 Arrives (5:00 PM) Load Grandstand Truck (5 - 8 PM) Load Extreme Truck (5 - 8 PM) Load. Extreme Truck (7 —10 AM) Stadium Dismantle Remove Office Trailer (PM) Disconnect Phone & Power 16. Thursday, June 15 Clean Beach (AM) Remove Dumpster Jl111 L`1 UU Diva J•JL 11LL January 24, 2000 1R V IMG L131 11V. Mary Rooney Assistant City Manager and Director of Community Resources City of Hermosa each Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 ...Pit.) 'I ! J J...)17 Dear Mary, he Beach Bash 1999 proved to be a tremendous the restaurants and businesses il�tit South ur- day event generated tremendous revenue � r local hotels, Bay area. Highlights of last year's event include: • Over 600 local hotel rooms were booked by Beach Bash, Mervyn's California and a host of smaller sponsors. • Estimated 50,000 people in attendance. • Events held in three local establishments including: Hennessey's, Beach House, The Lighthouse Cafe and Sangria. • Live coverage on Los Angeles television stations, five and a half hours of national air time on Fox Sports Net and one hour on ESPN and newspaper coverage throughout the country. • $37,000 in fees paid to the city of Hermosa Beach. ($13,000 — overtime pay to local police officers and administrative expenses of processing the overtime paperwork; $24,000 - film location fees). IMG is already working with the local hotels and restaurants for Beach Bash 2000 to bring the same kind of windfall to the City of Hermosa Beach this June. Some examples are: • Sangria will be the venue for Beach Bash 2000's Sponsor Summit and the AVP Blowout Bash. • Beach Bash 2000 drink specials with local restaurants and nightclubs. • Lodging for sponsors, VIP clients, staff— Buying out all rooms at the Beach House, Portofino, Hotel Hermosa and Sea Sprite Inn. • Shuttles from the local churches and high schools. • National, international television. I hope the above helps you to illustrate to the commission the financial and marketing contribution of Beach Bash 2000. Sincerely, James Leitz JL/jwl 11755 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDI SUITE 850 LOS ANGELES.; CA 190025-1415 310 473-0411_ PAX: 310 473-3914 S 1 1 1 1 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 JR1' L4—UU RAJA J• UL r1V1 lfaU fr.n AU. JIU :IJ JJli Easy Reader • UotuME XIX. HUMBER dB + JUNE 11, 1999 Big Beach Bash benefits bounteous by Robb Fulcbec M'rvn's Bcacll Bash, last weekend's four-day festival of volleyball music and citheme sports. p;:ml'ee an enormous amount aff sone'. Into lintels and restau- rants in Hermosa Beach and neigltb•srins Redondo Beach. International Management Group. of Los Angeles. which put on the ever,: for ±tlervvli s and a host of smaller sponsors, booked 241 local hotel rooms for an aver, age 2.5 nights, totaling more than 600 room•nlghts. Numerous additional rooms were booked b+' Mervyn's, whose executives prowled the Beach Bash in large num- bers, and by the fki, oeiation of Volleyball Professionals. ashless flew in competitors and staff for its tournament that was part of the Beach Bash. "They booked all those hotel rooms. and all those people spent money in the city;" said: Mary Rooney, assistant. City Beach Bash. in luditr_ IS South Bay tau amts :es. moat of them restaurants. hotels and coffee houses, The rest of the cosponsors rait3ed from KROQ-FSI radio to Lee Jeans and Paul tlitcltetl hair produces, a well•knotyn sponsor of beach.spores. 'Thee seemed to du a gcod job of combining big ;ut'pnrale sponsorship •.vitt smaller iocat ;tantsorship ' Rooney said. !NIG spent more then SS million putting on rho Beach- Bash.' an•.: ,llervy'ti s apparently_ spent much more. looking for a big nharketing return. ller,'yn s officials were unavailable before press time, The marketing payback for the spon- sors. and for the •:it".: included hours of live coverage On L.A. television Stations. five and•a-half hours of air time on Fos Sports Net with multiple rc•akkhtgs. an hour an CSPN•TV and countless _oI- unut•inchet in newspapers throughout the countr.4 A•Ieriv: n 5 also used the event to high- light its Sift of S:300.090 to the Women i Sswrts Foundation fur ;.allege scholar- ships fur female athletes, (MG save 36,600 to the Women s Sports Foundation and 53.30) to the Surfrider Foundation. manager and director of the community resources department. 'Obviously the economic impact of the event was positive ' Rooney said. 'That's an understatement." The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce had no specific information on the local impact of the Beach Bash, but Directbr Carol Duff said the event obviously blade a significant o titribu- tion to Hermosa businesses. 3n estimated. 50,000 people showed up over the course of the event. Beach events overseen by the city typ- ically are not allowed to sell food, so the pier area restaurants were teeming Friday, Saturday and Sunday. `1t was one of our best weekends ever.' said Susan Gilmore, a manager at Hennessey's Tavern on Pier Avenue. "This store has been open ::2 gears and we expanded three years ago. *ad Saturday we had our best day since the The zit.: of Hermosa Beach recaver:d about 5':; 00) in fees front 1tfG..tbeut i tool ,�Ot) of that total represented direct costs to aternosa $uch• is .h:: salaries of pntire officers working overtime and the tstirrateel •tdmtnisuatiye cost of pr,,,_ess• in:; the overtime papa.vurk Boone,: • 'We recover eve:'vthing.' site add. The ::.ihniain$ 524 -)O5) represented items such as alba locution tees. James Lenz vice president of. E IG ;aid workers will be fit -tithed this week dismantling the event's bleacher;. stages and what•no:. including the il0i) ) wooden bowl used for the extrbtne skat- ing. skateboartlins and bieyeliny events. The bo'.vi, made of Fnai>h pls em sd an t desig-ted in Germany by a Bavarian named Hans Greiner. Is 64 feet long. -52 feet wide tud t'' and-a•half feet deep. The larger remains of the event will ire hauled away in 2-5 semi•truck loads. Leila said. IMG hopes to return the Beach Bash to Hermosa next summer. •We have -every intention of coming back the same tittle next year . Gels -4 said. 'tlerv;:n's is the big daddy. They're the Iyrchpin in this thing, they make it hap- pen. They brought to sponaura like Side Out for volkcyt'alE and Lee Jeans for the music and the skateboarding.' ER expansion. It was it bast ;l third again as busy." Bung `ago a _ashier,s Roberts Liquors on Pier avenue said the Beach Bash sent -much more business- his way. In addition Men ens secured the rooftop section of Hennessey s for a Saturday night }party and held events in local esta;ilishment: including tlhc Beac. Hoose, the Lighthouse Giic and Sangria. Ott the other hand. the Pier Sar( Store on Pier Plans probably lost some busi- ness to a skateboard vendor who ,vas placed within fen of the store. 'It was such an excellent day it proh'a' bly didn t make that much difference. said Ned McHugh. a partner in Pier Surf: "But definitely every board he sad was one we didn't sell. The guy actualll cisme over and aro:asized. He thought ne would be on the beach. not on the 11155o.' Rooney braised !MG for joining Mervyn s with hi imall•:r e.•-+l+wucrs >35 .14 ,atm -erne b:wells! pe -.7, fora Jur:11; f'h"ndae.; ,eanrl•ars ar Atervyu i Belch Bosh 99. Preto E. Robb Aske:r BEACH BASH 2000 Hermosa Beach PLAN scale 1"=:32' beach walk. ENTRANCE/EXIT beach walk ENTRANCE/EXIT Z.1 'AAA MAA61,4 Pls7 ZTra • VENDOR VILLAGE MITA OZ EEO 212111A kT6 •-.: consortium studios Ph 3113 39B 959E1 fit 313 395 8458 ) Main \Entrance —0 — cc • * • o Jurnboto a 4 wa.F1,7 • • • Hu Slut a —mrr bathroom _s LJ I 4. . • • • • \ 6 • • 6 • • • Main Stage to ocean • Ed WU9E:TT 000E SE INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on March 28, 2000, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP (IMG) and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the IMG — California Sports Festival on JUNE 8 - JUNE 11, 2000. FEES Permit fee shall be $13,952 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day and other CITY fees as required. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by CITY. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by CITY on behalf of the tournament shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from CITY. LOCATION o On Beach, North and South of the Pier ❑ Pier Plaza o Tournament operations and staging are subject to change if necessary SECURITY CITY shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one (1) representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one (1) representative of IMG. IMG shall provide no less than ten (10) unarmed security officers. Said Officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of CITY'S alcohol ordinance. CITY shall provide Officers for the event as follows: (6) Officers per day, or as many Officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. CITY shall provide as many Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of Officers and Fire/Paramedic personnel shall be assumed by IMG. 1 CLEAN-UP IMG shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the tournament: • The Beach and Strand, (impacted area) • Pier Avenue, (impacted area) The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash outside the CITY following the tournament. IMG shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: • Beach (impacted area) • Strand (impacted area) • And, additional trash receptacles as CITY requires. IMG shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off trash bin on 11th Street at Beach Drive and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side. CITY staff will determine if additional toilets are needed. IMG shall take necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. IMG shall make arrangements for such bins. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. IMG shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. If IMG desires any County services, they must process their request through CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by IMG. INSURANCE At least ten (10) days prior to the event, IMG shall provide CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage with $4 million in excess liability. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current AM Best's rating of no less than A:VI1. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to CITY and County. IMG insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include any andall areas occupied or affected by the event. • • IMG agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of IMG, its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADMISSION FEES Pending Coastal Commission approval, IMG may charge admission for less than 25% of the available seating for the event. CITY will be provided with a event fee scale chart two weeks prior to the tournament. IMG agrees to pay CITY $4,000 or 25 percent of the gross admission revenue, whichever is greater. IMG agrees to furnish records and make payment of $4,000 to CITY two weeks prior to the tournament and make additional payments, if applicable within two weeks after the tournament. CITY reserves the right to audit any and all financial records of IMG specific to priority seating for the tournament. CITY will receive a final copy of the tournament revenue and expenditures in regards to priority seating ticket sales within seven (7) days of the end of the tournament. ADVERTISING IMG shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. Signage regarding CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by IMG. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for postings. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by IMG to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of IMG. CITY shall permit two street banners to be posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be. the responsibility of IMG. CITY shall permit IMG to display six (6) large replicas of their product. CITY staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. PARKING IMG shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 24-72 hours in advance of event (as directed by CITY), and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. IMG shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. IMG shall be required to make announcements indicating: 1) where there is free parking; and, 2) that CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. 3 • • IMG shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of CITY. IMG shall provide directional signs and advertisement which shall be approved in advance by CITY. Information regarding shuttle bus service shall be included in all tournament advertisements. • At no time may IMG block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at- anytime by CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the tournament. CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. CITY Council must approve any/all requests for bands/concerts prior to the event. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. CITY shall allow IMG the opportunity to sell official IMG tournament concession items pursuant to certain conditions: • No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted on the Beach or in the Pier Plaza area, • Free sampling booths will be permitted on the beach, per CITY conditions and Health Department approval; and, • All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF IMG IMG shall be responsible to obtain all necessary County and State health permits as required. IMG will be required to obtain an amplification permit from CITY. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. IMG will be solely responsible for event management. IMG shall be responsible to protect the lower Pier (plaza) surface per the Department of Public Works. IMG shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by CITY staff. IMG shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. IMG shall maintain public access openings on the Strand Wall (Pier). IMG will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by CITY. IMG shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting said tournament. 4 • IMG shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. At CITY'S option, IMG is required to display and permit CITY. representatives to present a perpetual trophy to tournament winners following the finals. CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND AND/OR TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT AT ANY TIME. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP Director of Operations Date ATTEST City Clerk Date . „ Title Sponsor Makai Events Event Description > 24 Team Rugby tournament on the beach. > Saturday — Round robin pool play. > Sunday — Playoffs. Issues/ Changes from Last Year > Need to coordinate with Sunset Concert on the Beach (Sunday). > Require approval of signs prior to event. Total City Fees (estimated) $7,250.00 • 1219 Morningside Drive • Manhattan Beach, CA -90266- . 114310) 345.9585: Fax (310) 546.9$90 . (www.MskaiEvcnrs.con) • • r 7's -in the Sand . • 1. Sponsor: Red Bull Energy prink, -others tbd July 28-30, 2000 • Setup:. - Tournament: . • Break down: ' Friday. • Saturday 'Sunday -Sunday • 8:00 am6:00 pm 8:00 am'— 5:.00 pm 8:00 am — 5:0D pm' .'5:00 pm -=7:00 pm Set up: 2 fields (120' x 240' each) located on the north side Of the • area between the fields consisting ofteam:tents and referee* eh nt:• site map) • . 'Game: 14 minutes game. 7'minute half with 2-minu__te halftime: =Each field iii • have 6 referees and a scoreboard.' •• 36 team tournament ' • • • each team is guaranteed 4 games Saturday "round robin" pool•play • Sunday divisional playoffs Parking:. Requesting 4 parking spaces (Friday' Sunday) for 2 trucks of : 'equipment. Will need to be able to unload (Friday 8:00 pm -11:00 aft)) and foal (Sunday 5:00 pm _ 9:00.pm) where 14th Street meets the beach. Requesting to keep one vehicle overnight to lock up,equipment. , • Banners: Requesting to hang 4 street'b'anners•foi• the event. Security.: Will provide 24 hr security from' Friday '5:00 .pm to Sunday -a:00 pm. Will provide 2 security officers during the day and 1 security officer.during the - night.. ' / • • • -:XTY OF IIER1V1OSA 11EAC:II Department Corritnunity Renwtr-c.es 710 Piet_ .A.ver.itei. Ileirultesa :ch, CA 902:54 la 1(3318-132 BO Fax (310) $72-4333 1:"Zi;i4-1; NNYAITiikirice47.4e6TiFitiN:67gfr".i':TEN-71 4: 11 :11:1.2:o.tioiLvtr. Nana e:;; I -PP eVo\ri-s au -I -Kb -12+1 OlutrogNiFf g.Lt (413\3 Foop3A-u. Nor 21.0E11 X It'll) Li profit ID • 0 t 249 30 6 cA \-4 0 r-•• N 1 N (-f I kl- t V e• 1* 3 ‘I a 1/2.`.1;:i*" _ 4 li State C... ZIP 'A iiil Wtx,t•i:_• _4_.6_•____Fa210 • 5L. . . .. . : . i'..•,.: -1:t .:-t31:7.1:: Per 6 IV Tit0: IA lCut-e -t-t.a oc.At.A . . •.: • &A-t-te• . -Ai..; I! : . < i!.. 5 : feIP 4' ii f ii AC.) • Gi40 -q535 rye Ilione 310 -et LI • Li • Wirt-tA gueiel -pkittkolu‘91.rr. 1COUND ‘,(1'f;tt V001.- RAJ GAND 32‘.-3.10FFS • sof eve;at: Af • all*V . • .. . • • • • EVe.13.4•.: of ti dic.).mn b 2S/ 30 grt 0-00 0 c71-) f3-673rcit_ WWI 1k- OF pteca 1•64---ks -ST9-6-€.7 o ---»j 200,0 —Sof- 49 OARD Utt SO/ 200° c2,2- a y -y-, 1.1,./31 • X I 03' Of Pasticipstntc luding volunteers): 4! 1. (7 113:: ed[ nws.ttbe: 7 of ipe tators: of VehicIesirTx Lich 6 0 M q0c) ti ) Lon of Set lap fox ts event: 3 5'0 61749. s 2(y 2C -tents 00 , 0- -6€14 — 10. • i.-1 ii.9:11.al i3a.formation / re I:nests: •_____________________________ .............. T:12 -t -i tu F -PF-- 1/430u0D. 41 7i- 41 t ' ; 4!1:.!11.15:101:i ityft) 0,4!},,Iyitt67 .Applicatior. Fee Permit Fee Se t -13.1E)/Tea r- down Co- q)o.nsors • Arnplificatbn Pern: 13ariric.T(s) Public .‘,•iforks ng .0t1er• C.c.1.5t s To t .1.-1;1.1.e • $5D0 600 4toed-e_iL 4'1 \ Cao I/ "2 0161°A S > z 11 .!-1 ; f:ater kr le S eVidC nee of -.).r a lc ate; I-• ;Sa Beath and its en-, City of liellnos causeii, a.F.-i:3ing i • • Yes No Received. ag i rtqulested, applicant agiecs to t-.5 n [ion comp rehensivegene.i.a.1 liability insurance in •the the e..ntirc... period of this permit; naming, th,f eity of .;..,.oyees as additiotial insi.u:c..11. Pe rmitte,...-. WaiVeS ClairMS Beach, its officers, agents, ancl employe CS, for fc,•es t of or in any way conncted. with the exercise cif ti:th. .A. GREES 'I 0 CO PLY V,' 1.1 ALI: A PPL IC KN.1.3 LAVIS NID TO MAINTAIN IN R TUIN SAID PRE S 1 N THE ;5.3./A.NIE CO Ic.f Dill ON .6.S. "WERE BEFORE: SAIL) .1SE. 1 2iF:110' coprEiriva91-1"EREIN IS TRUE.:' A_PID C:ORRECT :HEST ac• KNO WLE!" .A.L.L, FEES) CHARGES AND 021-11;:,R: MATERIAL WILL ) AND OR FLI.;?NiSHE'.% TO TiE DEPARTMENT OF COMMVN1TY RESOURCES AS NA :_::41.1A,Y AGREED TO RY pARTEEs. ir Represent:alive. Date • • • ,processeca tlir 01: gh City Council . YES N() • 1. 01;111:1 CIA Of (:;ornnittrrity R .:sources - c Department Date 1: -.)ate Date Lifegaurd Tower \ Event Headquarters 20' x 20stage spe2er • Lifegaurd Tower Poles 000 Spe2er Hospitality TeMs 3-20' x 20 tents meartato referees ' West Cent Sorts Medicine • Field 1 speaker Sponsor Tents 5- 10' x 10' tents Registration, Scoreboard, Information & Stereo 2 - 10' x 10' tents spe2er generator Restrooms spe2er Event Headquarters #2 124x 18' stage • FieId2. 1 7's in the Sand - Rugby California Style July 29 - 30, 2000 Site Map as4not KM ennv-- Los Angeles Rugby Club CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on March 28, 2000, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between Makai Events (ME), a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the Los Angeles Rugby Club on July 28-30, 2000. FEES Event fee shall be $3,837.00 per day plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day and other CITY fee as required. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by CITY. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the event. All unanticipated costs incurred by CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from CITY. LOCATION o North Side of Pier o Event operations and staging are subject to change if necessary. SECURITY CITY may establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one (1) representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one (1) representative of ME. ME shall provide no Tess than four (4) unarmed security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the event for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the CITY'S alcohol ordinance. CITY shall provide Officers for each day of the event as follows: One (1) Officer from 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM, or as many Officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. CITY shall provide Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by ME. CLEAN -UP ME shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the event: • Strand and affected beach areas 1 • The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash outside CITY immediately following the event. ME shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: • North side of pier (impacted area) • Strand (impacted area) • And, additional trash receptacles as CITY requires ME shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 15 yard roll -off trash bin on 11th Street at Beach Drive and four (4) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side. CITY staff will determine if additional toilets are needed. ME shall take the necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. ME shall make arrangements for such bins. INSURANCE At least ten (10) days prior to the event, ME shall provide CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current AM Best's rating of no less than A:VII. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to CITY and County. ME insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by the event. ME agrees to:defend, indemnify, and hold CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of ME its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING ME shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by ME. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by ME to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarilydeny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of the ME. CITY of Hermosa Beach shall permit two (2) street banners to be posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of ME. • • PARKING ME shall berequired to post temporary "No Parking" signs 24-72 hours in advance of event (as directed by CITY) and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. ME shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. ME shall be required to make announcements indicating: 1) where there is free parking; and 2) that CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. At no time may ME block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the event. CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. ME shall submit all requests for specific events in writing to CITY, allowing at least 30 days for CITY review and approval. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY CITY shall allow ME the opportunity to sell Los Angeles Rugby Club concession items pursuant to certain conditions: • No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted; and, All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF ME ME shall be responsible to obtain all necessary County and State health permits as required. ME will be required to obtain an amplification permit from CITY. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. ME will be solely responsible for event management. ME shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by CITY staff. ME will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by CITY. ME shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and necessary personnel for conducting said event. ME shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on scheduled days. ME shall ensure that the Rugby event does not interfere with the CITY's Concerts on the Beach (set-up, tear -down and/or sponsor requirements) scheduled for Sunday, July 30, 2000. If there are any conflicts between the two events, the CITY's decisionshall be final with regards to any operational and/or sponsorship issues. 3 CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND AND/OR TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT AT ANY TIME. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM Date City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date MAKAI EVENTS Director of Operations Date ATTEST City Clerk Date Imam e cel Vegda o kedl Title Sponsor Power Gel & Revenge Event Description This triathlon features: > 1/4 mile swim, 9-mile bike leg and 3 mile run. > Despite the fact that this event requires street closures, the whole race ends before noon, leaving the City streets open for the remainder of the day. > The race includes a festival afterwards, which features an amateur volleyball tournament and fun family events. Issues/ Changes from Last Year > May need to change staging area due to Pier construction. > Race route subject to change per Hermosa Beach Police Department review. Total City Fees $8,068.00 • FACT SHEET Dates: October 7th, set-up & pre -registration; October 8th, race and tear -down Times: October 7th, 5:30am — Sunset; October 8th, 5:30am — Sunset Events: Sprint triathlon, expo, snow shoe sand races. Location: Pier Ave. and the Strand People: 700 participants, 100 volunteers, 500 spectators Parking: From Beach Ave. to the Pier Parking Hours: October 7th at 5:30am through October 8th at 5:30am Th41'Day At The Beach Time,ine Hermosa Beach, CA October 8, 2000 SATURDAY, 10/7 5:30am Set up crew arrives. 5:30am — Sunset All set up is completed for race following day. Set up includes, stage, finish, booth tents, fencing, transition area and bike racks. SUNDAY, 10/8 4:30am All staff arrives for race day. 6:OOam Registration opens. 7:OOam Registration closes. Pre race announcements are given at Swim start. 7:15am Race start wave #1 7:18am Race start wave #2 7:21 am Race start wave #3 7:24am Race start wave #4 7:27am Race start wave #5 7:30am Race start wave #6 7:33am Race start wave #7. 7:36am Race start wave #8 7:45am Race leader finished bike course 8:05am • Race leader has finished race 8:35am All competitors are off the bike course 9:10am Last competitor has finished race 9:15am All competitors should have crossed the finish line. 10:OOam— 10:30am Snow Shoe race in front of stage. 11:OOam Awards, begin tear -down CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 Fax (310) 372-4333 Organization's Name: Michael Epstein Sports Productions, Inc. Profit. x Non profit . .. • • ' Address: 29395 Agoura Rd. #102 City: Agoura Hills Non profit ID - . State CA ZIP 91301 Phone: 818-707-8866, x14 Fax 818-707-8868 Contact Person/Title roel Griesbach - Event coordinator Address: same as above City: State. ZIP Day Phone: Eve Phone Brief description of event: 9th annual sprint triathlon Dates of Event: Set-up Oct. 7th, Event Oct. 8th Location of Event: Staged at Pier Ave. and the Strand Set up /Tear down Time & Dates: Set-up Oct. 7th, 5:30am, Tear down Oct,.ath.,_2_:_alipm—start Time Event will begin: 6am, Oct. 8th Time event will end: unsan„__oct_g_t_b_ Number of Participants (including volunteers): • Anticipated number_ of spectators: Number of Vehicles/Trucks: 50.0. •750 Description of Set up for this event: -. Set-up .on.the beach will be- on the. breaCh. ilorth of :-the pier - Oct:. 8th. tranition% area iriaza wi ll bPg:i n a s early._ as allowed by city staff 'preferably: Sat afternoon Additional information requests: Application ,Fee ...• Permit Fee Set-up/Tear-down Co-sponsors Amplification Permit Banner(s) Police Fire Public Works Parking Other Costs Total Due Insurance Required: Yes Received (To iLL ` Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach evidence of $2 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, and employees, for fees or damages caused, arising out of or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO. COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICANTS LAWS -AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE .SAME. CONDITION 'AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE, INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER MATERIAL WILL BE PAID .AND OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES - 411,1, Comply Representative Permit to be processed through City Council nat!/7/m YES /' . NO Depart/nent of ommunity Resources R-2-00 Date Police Department Date Fire Department Date 11th St s w n OCEAN Lifeguard HQ Registration Tent Pier Hermosa Beach Triathlon Site Refreshment Booths Timing Tent Run Finish Finish OCEAN DJ. Awards Volleyball Tournament Sponsor Booths , O❑❑❑❑ > � Strand Restaurants Beach Dr. Parking Restaurant's Store's . r Run Start Bike Racks Bike Racks. I Bike Racks Bike Racks Plaza Bike Bike Out In 4 4 Mermaids Good Stuff Beach Dr. Restaurant's Store's Sidewalk 4— 4 Hermosa Aven e iR_ Sidewalk ..... r________, --t � r4!!:,' t 1 \ . 1 I - l i I' II_11•:11".. H I ^.11 •::(:. . I.S tnarf'- <'s4, ►s ttr.)t)t •1 \, 1:4 . 1 C•ICU c•: < �-- it/' Jl. ,,?%' •V. II j �� if (-I �! �► .z''\ c'}(Nf> WO ELC tt1�:; 11 I• :.1 1J X. i ; ' .r IY .,; / , I , . . // 1 lr` i r .' , .1 , .'. 1 • •il ' \ ' , 1:t+• 1`/ 0.r <rt 4-,- ‘;" • \• •.•l :.1 r •11•• (.11AI...It!If •, . t• f ' l CIt1A e ;1ti �' i 'r c• L. L :.• ` i • ti r41 • MICHAEL EPSTEIN SPORTS PRODUCTIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT •/X. r:{iEirJ.Y� tan. 1. This contract is entered into on March 28, 2000 at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the MICHAEL EPSTEIN SPORTS PRODUCTIONS (MESP), a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to TRIATHLON AND FESTIVAL on OCTOBER 8, 2000. FEES Permit fee shall be $1,918.40 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day and other CITY fees as required. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by CITY. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the event. All unanticipated costs incurred by CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from CITY. LOCATION o Pier Plaza o . Base of Pier (construction on Pier) o On Beach, North and South of the Pier o Strand o Triathlon Route (See attached diagram) o Event operations and staging are subject to change if necessary due to CITY construction SECURITY CITY shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one (1) representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and . one (1) representative of MESP. CITY shall provide Officers for the event as follows: Fourteen (14) Officers (average of 2-4 hours) from 7,00 a.m., or as many Officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. CITY may require MESP to provide additional unarmed security guards and the cost shall be borne by MESP. CITY shall provide Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief.. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by MESP. CLEAN-UP - MESP shall use a professional maintenance service to provide additional trash receptacles (at the following locations), clean the area, and haul the trash outside CITY following the event: • Pier Avenue (impacted area), • Beach (impacted area) • Strand (impacted area) O And, additional trash receptacles as CITY requires MESP shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 3 yard trash bin on 11th Street at Beach Drive and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side. CITY staff will determine if additional toilets are needed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. MESP shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of event if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The County shall have the authority to cancel or re-route the swim portion of the race depending on surf conditions. CITY requires written confirmation from the County on the number of Lifeguards needed to ensure maximum safety for the swim portion of the event. If MESP desires any County services, they must process their request through CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by MESP. INSURANCE At least ten (10) days prior to the event, MESP shall provide CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing :- personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming CITY, and County of Los Angeles their.. officers, employees and agents asadditional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current AM Best's rating of no less__:: than A:VI!.:Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to CITY and County. MESP insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by the event. MESP agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against' any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of MESP its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. All participants will be required to show waivers on behalf of CITY. MESP will assume,full responsibility for ensuring the waivers are signed by said participant and shall assume cost for reproduction of waivers. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, deemed necessary by MESP to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of MESP. 2 CITY shall permit two (2) street banners to be posted for the event. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of MESP. PARKING MESP shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs along the race course where appropriate 24-72 hours in advance of event (as directed by CITY) and be responsible for the removal of signs on event day. MESP shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. MESP shall be required to direct participant parking in CITY lots through advertising and race flyers. All costs to reserve parking will be paid by MESP. At no time may MESP block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the contracted event. CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. CITY Council must approve any/all requests for bands/concerts prior to the event. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF. CITY CITY shall allow MESP the opportunity -to sell official MESP concession items pursuant to certain conditions: O No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted; and,- Free nd,- Free sampling booths will be permitted on the beach, per CITY conditions and Health Department approval: and, • All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF MESP MESP shall be responsible to obtain all necessary County and State health permits as required. MESP will be required to obtain an amplification permit from CITY. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY. Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on Tile at the Department of Community Resources. MESP will be solely responsible for event management. MESP shall be responsible for the protection of lower Pier (plaza) surface, per the Department of Public Works. MESP shall notice all affected residents and businesses of race. CITY staff shall determine areas to be noticed. MESP shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by CITY staff. MESP shall provide adequate detour signs to identify alternate driving routes through the CITY. MESP will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by the CITY. MESP shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such an event. MESP shall only set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND AND/OR TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT AT ANY TIME. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT. OF. COMMUNITY. RESOURCES Director Date MICHAEL EPSTEIN SPORTS PRODUCTIONS Director of Operations Date ATTEST City Clerk Date ! CITY OF HiERMOSA BEACH& Department of Community Resou es 710 Pier Avenue, Heimosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone (310)318-0280 Fax (310) 372-4333 Peiuiits shall be required for any group or organization requesting use of a public outdoor area or facility within the City of Hermosa Beach. 1 All groups or organizations shall address requests to the Department of Community Resources, 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, Phone 318-0280. 2. The Special Event Policy and all pertinent rules and regulations .will accompany the pec licit. These rules and regulations must be strictly adhered to and all pertinent City Ordinances shall be enforced. The Department of Community Resources will . review the permit ;;and either approve or deny the request. The decision can ,be :appealed _to;]`the Parks, Recreation and Community . Resources . Advisory. -Commission`.- (see Special Event Ordinance). Some requests may. be sent to City Council -for their review and/or final approval. A SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION must be filled out at least 15 working days prior to date of use for small events. Larger events will require :more time to process. Submit application with $500 event applicatian°fee (applied to event fees). Any individual or group that is not registered non-profit organization or any event/activity sponsored by commercial entities/advertisers. Event must be open to the general public . , A) Any Group or organization registered with the Federal Government as a non-profit corporation and that has a non-profit corporation number. B) Any group or organization recognized by the City of Hermosa Beach as a local service organization. Event must be open to the general public. In order to qualify for non-profit status: 1) 100% of all proceeds collected on behalf of the event (after operational and permit expenses are met) must go to the non-profit organization. This includes all entry, TV and sponsorship ceeds. 2) A registered non-prc organization must be the permit applicant. . Special event permits will not be granted to private groups. Valley Park, Greenwood and Bicentennial and South Park are available for reservation by Hermosa Beach residents at no charge. Block parties require police permit and are subject to a peunit fee. Beach Volleyball courts are available on a first come first serve basis for all individuals. The Pier Avenue Courts are reserved by the City for special events. A pass through event is exactly what the name implies, events that just pass through the City of Hes ii.osa Beach. The event does not tee nlinate or begin in the City. The participants merely pass through on their way to their destination. Amount . shall be negotiated between the City and applican minimumamount set at $1,744.00 per day. Fee shall be $1.20 per participant and spectator up to :1,500 people:'_ The organization shall be subject to contract negotiations with the City _and will be in the same category as Commercial Groups with participants -and spectators numbering more than 1,500. Pass-Throughs Permit processing fee: $117.00 • _i�,....... :i1 Permit processing fee: Amplification permit fee: $ 29.00 $ 41.00 $200.00 refundable cash deposit rThIs permit is to be obtained through the Hermosa Beach Police Department Hermosa Valley Park. No charge for permit processing. immiNgur �. .' is a . Peimit processing fee: $29.00 Permit processing fee: Location fee (public property only): Business License fee (per 31 days): City operated Meters/Parking Space: Police fees per Police Officer: Banner Peiinit: Permit processing fee: Location fee: $349.00 $814.00 per day $274.00 $ 16.00 per day $ 65.00 per hour $215.00 per banner $ 58.00 $ . 58.00 per day In addition to fees listed here, all costs incurred by the City on behalf of.. the event shall be assumed by the applicant. Those costs shall be determined upon finalization of the permit. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED Fees Effective 9/1/99 CITY OF HERIVIOSA BEACH Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 Fax (310) 372-4333 Organization's Name: Profit Non profit Address: Non profit ID City: State ZIP Phone: Fax Contact Person/Title: Address: City.: State Day Phone: Eve Phone Brief description of event: Dates of Event: Location of Event: Set up /Tear down Time & Dates: Time Event wilt begin: Time event will end: Number of Participants (including volunteers): • Anticipated number of spectators: Number of Vehicles/Trucks: Description of Set up for this event: .Additional information requests: Application Fee Pei mit Fee Film Set-up/Tear-down Co-sponsors Amplification Periiiit Banner(s) Police Fire Public Works Parking Other Costs Total Due $500 Insurance Required: Yes No Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach evidence of $2 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this peg mit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Pei niittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, and employees, for fees or damages caused, arising out of or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICANTS LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION -AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. 1 CERT1»'Y THAT THE, INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT..TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER MATERIAL .'WILL .BE PAID. AND OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES - Company Representative. Permit to be processed through City Council Department of Community Resources Police Department Date Fire Department Date CommSial Event Categories ancipriteria For Event Fees CATEGORY I: MODERATE IMPACT FEE: Daily Minimum of $ 1,744 A Category T event meets the criteria of a commercial event and: o Impacts public areas for no longer than one (1) day including set-up. • Is conducted in the off season (not between Memorial Day and Labor Day or any holiday) • Participant/Spectator crowds do not exceed 3,000 • Has no television coverage (except news) • A norz-profit entity is the beneficiary of the net revenues (100%) o Does not meet the identifying criteria for a Category II or III event CATEGORY II: MEDIUM IMPACT FEE: Daily Minimum + 10% plus a $200 set-up and tear Down fee per day. A Category II event meets the criteria of a commercial event and.does not qualify as a Category I event: • Impacts public areas for more than one (1) day including set up • Has television coverage • Has more than $3,000 and less than $50,000 in prize money • : Does not meet any of the identifying criteria for a Category III event CATEGORY III: HIGH IMPACT FEE: Daily Minimum +100% and a $200 set-up and tear -down fee per day and a (if applicable) percentage of gross admission revenues. A Category III event meets the criteria for a commercial event and has one or more of the following: • Has network television coverage • Estimated participant/spectator crowds exceed 5,000 • Prize money in excess of $50,000 o Charges admission to spectators o Gross revenues in excess of $50,000 Effective 9-99 (Annual Update from Master Fee Schedule) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 25 26 27 28 • ORDINANCE NO. ,_1020 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING • THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT POLICY. - WHEREAS, discussions regarding amending the Special Event Permit Policy were held by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission on September 27 and October 25, 1989; and WHEREAS, the City Council in order to assure public order and tranquillity within the City's •outdoor facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council does strive to equitably administer major events held in the City's outdoor public facilities; THE CITY . COUN CIL ' OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That.section, 22-5 of the City Code.entitled- ttSpecial`Event Permit:Policy" shall be _amended:as..-.follows: Section 22-5: Permits: Commercial Groups Permits shall be required for any Commercial Group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility 'within .the 'City- of • Hermosa Beach. Such permits shallbe subject -to contract. negotiations with the City with a set mini -mum permit fee of - .$1,500 f -.$1,500 per day plus 'all costs incurred by the City on behalf of the •event. Section 22-5.1. Permits: Non -Profit Organizations Permits shall be required .for any non-profit group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility within the City of 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13- 14- 15 314 .15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24, 25 26 27 28• Hermosa Beach. Such permits shall be subject to a per participant sp•ator fee• established by4Ipsolution of the City Council plus all costs incurred'by the City on behalf of the event. Any event numbering in excess of 13500 combined participants and spectators shall be subject to contract negotiations with the City of Hermosa Beach and fee adjustments. Section 22-5.2, Permits: Non Profit Organizations: Pass-thrus Permits shall be required for any non-profit group requesting use.of any outdoor area or public facility for a pass through event within the City of Hermosa Beach. Such events shall be subject to a permit. processing fee established by: Resolution of the City Council plus all costs incurred by the .City:on:behalf of the •event. • Section 22-5.3. Permits:' Block Parties • Requests for permits for use of -public- right-of-ways for Block Parties may be made only by .Hermosa Bea -ch residents to the • Director of Public Safety. All permit _requests .shall be• -subject to review and' approval by the Department Director or designee. -Such permits are subject to a permit processing fee established by Resolution of the City Council. Section 22-5.4.. Reservations: Parks Park reservations shall be available year round, to accommodate Hermosa Beach Residents for.informal or neighborh gatherings. Reservations are optional and there shall'be no- od 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 -18 19. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 charge except w •the City incurs direct costs on behalf of the event. Reservations 'can be Made -for the following parks only: • Valley Park: Corner of Gould and Valley.Dr. Bicentennial Park: Ith and Ardmore Greenwood Park: PCH & Aviation Section 22-5.5..Permits: Parks: Fundraising A permit shall. be •required for any Hermosa Beach based non-profit organization requesting use of a park for fundraising activities. Only Greenwood Park shall be available for this type of use.. The above -referenced organizationsshall be permitted -to reserve the park for this type of activity up to four .(14) . t.imes -per fiscal year. .Such permits shall be subject <to _ a permit' - ....processing --fee:.established by ..Resolution . of ..the .City.. Council.plus any::..direct- costs. incurred by:the City,.;.on :behalf .of: -the :event. Section 22-5.6. Beach -Permits No permits are required for use of -beach volleyball courts except for the courts located at the Pier. These courtsare reserved by the -City of Hermosa Beach for special events. :. Section 22-5.7. Permits: Commercial Filming A permit shall be required for any filming taking place in or on any .City owned property and/or private property. Such permits shall be subject to fee established by. Resolution of the City Council. Section 22-5.8. Application for Permit or Reservations 4 5 6 7 8 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 All organizations or individuals shall make application to • • , • the Department* Community Resources follkssuance of a Special • -.• Event. Permit or a Park Reservation. Section 22-5.9. Waiver of Fees "rhe Department of Community Resources Director or designee may waive or reduce permit fees for non-profit organizations upon a showing by the organization that the financial gain from the event would be substantially offset by the fees charged. However, direct costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event maynot be waived. Should a request for -.waiver or reduction. of fees be:deniedby the Director, ..applicant may appeal-the.decisionto.the Parks . . : Recreation andCommunityAlesourcesi,AdvisoryCommission;: • Said appeal trust:be submitted to the 'Commission .in writing via the Department of .Community Resources at least eight working days prior to -the Commission meeting. Section 22-5.10. Rules and Regulations . . Rules• and regulations•shall be established for the administration of this policy. Said rules and regulations may . - amended for each event to address public.safety concerns. All pertinent City ordinances shall be enforced. Section 22-5.11. Fees and Charges be All fees and charges may be changed .by Resolution of the CitY Council. • 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15- 16 17 18 '19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 • 27 28 SECTION 2. hat this ordinance shall take effect thirty ,(30) 4ii days from the date of adoptizin; -.and prio•o the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage thereof, the City Clerk shall • cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy REader, a.weekly newspaper of general circulation, published andcirculated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASS APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of November • _PR IDEof tY�e!Ci iV ouncil, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) ) • I, LINDA RIDDLE, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Hermosa•Beach, California, do hereby certify.that the foregoing Ordinance No. 89-1020 was duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting held at the regular meeting place thereof on the 28th day of November, Reader on December 7, 1989. The vote was as Follows; AYES:.. :Essertier,:.Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, _Mayor .Creighton. 1989 and was published in the Easy NOES: None Absent: None ABSTAIN::;None December 11, 1989 City clerk r 1/22-23 1/30 2/13 2/27 X000 'T ITA.TINT, It ti Hermosa Beach Sister Cities Association Conference Redondo Beach Super Bowl Sunday Invitational Mile 48th Annual Sand & Strand Run(s) & Munchkin Race Skateboard With A Semi -Pro Day 3/4 St. Patrick's Day "Hooley" 3/4 Great Autos of Yesteryear Classic Car Display (Rain Date: March 11t) 3/18-19 St. Patrick's Day Parade and Festival 3/19 O -T -L Softball Tournament #1 4/9 O -T -L Softball Tournament #2 4/18 Dan Crow Concert 4/15-16 6th Annual H.B. Footbag Championships 4/22 Spring Egg-Stravaganza 5/6 O -T -L Softball Tournament #3 5/7 Annual Dog Parade and Trick Show 5/13 4 -on -4 Flag Football Beach BashTournament 5/27 O -T -L Softball Tournament #4 5/27-29 Fiesta Hermosa#1 6/8-11 Mervyn's Beach Bash —IMG (Set up start 6/?) 6/10 O -T -L Softball Tournament #5 6/24. O -T -L Softball Tournament #6 7/8 O -T -L Softball Tournament #7 7/8-9.::. AAU-National Championships 7/9 •a Hermosa Beach Sunset Concert #1 7/16 • CBVA Beach Volleyball Tournament #1 7/16 Hermosa Beach Sunset Concert #2 7/? Lawn Bowling Open House 7/23 Hermosa Beach Sunset Concert #3 7/28-30 L.A. Rugby Club — Beach Rugby 7's Tournament 7/29 O -T -L Softball Tournament #8 7/30 Hermosa Beach Sunset Concert #4 8/4-6 International Surf Festival & BCHD Health Fair 8/12-13 . Aloha Day Surf Contest & Festival 8/? Cal- King Volleyball Tour 8/19 ; CBVA Beach Volleyball Tournament #2 8/19. O -T -L Tournament #9 9/2-4 Fiesta Hermosa #2 9/10 O -T -L Softball Tournament #10 9/15-17 Silver Sand Film Festival at Hermosa Beach 9/16 CBVA Beach Volleyball Tournament #3 9/16 California Coastal Clean-up Day 9/30 CBVA Beach Volleyball Tournament #4 10/8 9"' Annual HB Triathlon & Festival/CBVA Beach Volleyball Tournament #5 10/21 22 5°h Annual Fall C--lassic Hermosa Beachow cancelled 10/21 Sand Bowl Classic X 10/30 12th Annual Halloween Howl 11/? Senior Flu Clinic 11/? United States Surfing Federation Surf Contest 12/7 Tree Lighting Ceremony 12/9 Sand Snowman Contest revised 2/15/00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY RESOURCES D EP ARTMEN T 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 TRANSMITTAL/ MEMORANDUM TO: City Council DATE: ORGANIZATION/DEPARTMENT: 3-28-00 Hermosa Beach TOTALNO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: PHONE NUMBER: 4 PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 310-318-0280 FAX NUMBER: 310-372-4333 Tracy Yates, Administrative Assistant FROM: RE. IMG Commercial Beach Event Contract NOTES / COMMENTS: Mayor and Council, h has been es 3, 4, and 5 of the IMG Contract. The "Admission Fees" paragr a P Please replace pages removed. Thank You. Tracy Yates SUPPLEMENTAL C� INFORMATION V • • IMG agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of IMG, its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING IMG shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. Signage regarding CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by IMG. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for postings. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by- IMG to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of IMG. CITY shall permit two street banners to be posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of IMG. CITY shall permit IMG to display six (6) large replicas of their product. CITY staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. PARKING IMG shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 24-72 hours in advance of event (as directed by. CITY), and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. IMG shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. IMG shall be required to make announcements indicating: 1) where there is free parking; and, 2) that CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. IMG shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of CITY. IMG shall provide directional signs and advertisement which shall be approved in advance by CITY. Information regarding shuttle bus service shall be included in all tournament advertisements. At no time may IMG block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the tournament. CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. CITY Council must approve any/all requests for bands/concerts prior to the event. 3 • • ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. CITY shall allow IMG the opportunity to sell official IMG tournament concession items pursuant to certain conditions: • No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted on the Beach or in the Pier Plaza area, • Free sampling booths will be permitted on the beach, per CITY conditions and Health Department approval; and, • All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF IMG IMG shall be responsible to obtain all necessary County and State health permits as required. IMG will be required to obtain an amplification permit from CITY. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. IMG will be solely responsible for event management. IMG shall be responsible to protect the lower Pier (plaza) surface per the Department of Public Works. IMG shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by CITY staff. IMG shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. IMG shall maintain public access openings on the Strand Wall (Pier). IMG will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by CITY. IMG shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting said tournament. IMG shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. At CITY'S option, IMG is required to display and permit CITY representatives to present a perpetual trophy to tournament winners following the finals. 4 CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND AND/OR TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT AT ANY TIME. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP Director of Operations Date ATTEST City Clerk Date • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 TRANSMITTAL/ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: City Council Tracy Yates, Administrative Assistant OA ORGAN IZATION /DEPARTMENT: Hermosa Beach DATE: 3-27-00 PHONE NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 2 FAX NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: 310-318-0280 RE: FAX NUMBER: 2000 Commercial Event Applications, 310-372-4333 Item #5 NOTES/COMMENTS: Please replace the original title page with this amended title page. Note: Background, paragraph two, sentence one — from Commission to Council. Thank You. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION March 16, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 2000 COMMERCIAL EVENT APPLICATIONS Recommendation The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council: 1. Approve the slate of special events as listed below. 2. Approve the attached event contracts. EVENT 1. Beach Bash 2000 — IMG 2. Southern California Rugby Football - Makai Events 3. 9t` Annual Hermosa Beach Triathlon - MESP DATE FEES (estimated) June 8-11 July 29-30 October 8 $ 36,806.00 $ 7,250.00 $ 8,068.00 Note: Complete applications and event information are available for public review at: 1. Hermosa Beach Police Station 2. Hermosa Beach City Manager's Office 3. Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Office Background The City received applications for three commercial events on the beach. Each applicant paid the City a $500 deposit as required by the special event policy. These events were reviewed and approved by the Commission at their February 1, and March 7, 2000 meetings. Attachment A provides the Council with a grid that identifies (a) years each commercial event has been held in the City, (b) proposed event dates, and (c) projected City fees. Attachment B includes: (a) a description for each proposed event and special issues, (b) event applications, (c) site maps, and (d) event contracts. Analysis The attached contracts and policies have been developed by the City through several years of experience in staging commercial events. The City and event operators have worked together through the years in order to consider the needs of residents, and to account for potential opportunities for local businesses in the assembly and conduct of these events. 1 M,FR-22-2000 09:46 FROM • . / c RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON MEMORANDUM TO 13103726186 P.02/03 To: Steve Burrell FROM: Michael Jenkins DATE: March 22, 2000 SUBJECT: Hermosa Beach Stop Oil II As you know, Judge Kurt J. Lewin issued a minute order in the above -referenced case on March 15, 2000. This memorandum will explain the significance of the ruling. This case was initiated by Stop Oil in order to enforce the provisions of Proposition E and stop the Macpherson oil project. Following the City Council's action of September 17, 1998 declaring the project too hazardous to proceed, Macpherson filed a cross-complaint in the action alleging breach of contract. Judge Lewin previously ruled that Proposition E could not be applied to the project; in the subject minute order, he rules on certain legal issues arising from the cross-complaint. In his minute order, Judge Lewin agrees with the City's position that the Council's September 17 action could not constitute a breach of contract. He rules that the City's action constitutes an exercise of its police power to protect public safety, which is both contemplated within the lease itself, and beyond that, an inherent power of government that cannot be contracted away. The Judge concludes, however, that for the City to stop the project from going forward, the determination of hazard must be supported by sufficient new evidence not previously considered by the Council. Having read the Bercha report and the transcript of the September 17 hearing, he finds that the evidence of hazard contained in that report was neither new or substantial. The Judge concludes that the City was obligated to employ a less drastic means than rejection of the project of reducing risks to an acceptable level. While this conclusion is a disappointment, the Judge does agree with the City's arguments that Macpherson's sole remedy under the circumstances is specific performance, meaning that the City must allow Macpherson to proceed with its project. Monetary damages are not available. The order directs Macpherson's attorneys to prepare a judgment that will, in effect, constitute a final ruling on the cross-complaint. It is not clear what will happen next. Though Macpherson has been extended the right to proceed, its representatives have. 6 I MAR -22-2000 09:46 FROM RICHARDS, WATSON 8. C3ERShN MEMORANDUM March 22, 2000 Page S TO 13103726186 P.03/03 indicated some reluctance to do so. Further, Macpherson has allowed key permits to expire, including its Coastal and AQMD permits. Its lawyers have expressed an intent to seek damages on the theories that the City breached the lease by failing to vacate the City yard and failed to issue a building permit, both of which were also raised in its cross-complaint. In my judgment, neither theory has merit. Macpherson may consider an appeal to the court of appeal. The City also has the right to appeal the Court's determination on the hazard issue. That issue will be addressed by the Council in closed session_ TOTAL P.03 March 23, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 i LOS ANGELES COUNTY'S RETAIL FOOD INSPECTION PROGRAM Recommendation: That the City Council consider whether or not it wishes to adopt the County ordinance for the restaurant grading system. Background: As you will recall, the County implemented a restaurant grading system in 1998. Many cities in Los Angeles county adopted the ordinance that requires posting of the grade received by the Health Inspectors. Other cities did not adopt the ordinance but still received an inspection grade poster to place in the establishment. According to the Health Department staff report, in cities that did not mandate the program, those establishments that received an "A" grade displayed the poster, while those that received a "B" or "C" generally did not. As a result, establishments in cities that have not adopted the ordinance will no longer be given a poster regardless of the grade received. This is the Health Department's way of providing an incentive for the retail and restaurant businesses to request that the remaining cities adopt the ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Step en ' : urrell City Manager March 22, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 i ADDITIONAL REVENUE FOR STREET REPAIR Recommendation: That the City Council approve a letter to the Governor, Senate and Assembly members requesting an allocation for city streets and roads. Background: I have attached some information from the League of California Cities regarding this issue. Unlike other statewide issues that we have taken positions on in the past, this does not have a bill number yet. The League is requesting letters to initiate legislation that will return $500 million annually to local streets and roads. It is important to state our position for any hope of the Governor and legislature to deal with the needs that cities and counties have in repairing our streets. Respectfully submitted, Ste . en R. Burrell City Manager lb LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES March 17, 2000 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES #11-2000 THE TRANSPORTATION DEBATE IS DEFINITELY WARMING UP; THE GOVERNOR IS LIKELY TO RELEASE HIS PLAN IN APRIL; CITY OFFICIALS NEED TO DELIVER "THE MESSAGE;" THAT MESSAGE IS: AT LEAST $500 MILLION IN ANNUAL, ON-GOING REVENUE FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS IN THE 2000-2001 STATE BUDGET! DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SAYS ECONOMY LOOKS GOOD. Transportation The League of California Cities NEEDS YOUR HELP NOW to get the message to the Governor and the Legislature that $500 million in new funding for city streets and county roads is urgently needed. A full description of the facts and solutions relating to this problem was contained in the brochure we sent you: "California's Crumbling Road System." The Message to the Governor and Lawmakers is .. . To support the allocation of at least $500 million in new monies each and every year (on-going) directly to cities and counties for the preservation of city streets and county roads—in ANY LEGISLATIVE VEHICLE, whether it be an Assembly or Senate bill, a constitutional amendment, a resolution, a budget vehicle OR in the Governor's transportation plan. What's Going On? The Administration and lawmakers are pushing ahead with plans this year to address the state's transportation problems. There are several pieces of legislation, introduced last year, and this year to respond to the state's estimated $100 billion need over the next decade. Governor Gray Davis promised to release a transportation plan some time on OR before mid- April. It is important to act NOW and send in your letter of support for at least $500 million in new funds directly to cities and counties. Background Virtually every trip in California begins and ends on a city street or county road, whether traveling by bike, bus, rail, truck or family automobile. The local system of streets and roads is critical for Califomians, whether traveling to work, to school, for commerce or for recreation each day. League of California Cities 1400 K Street Sacramento CA 95814 916.658.8200 fax 916.658.8240 http://www.cacities.org The SR 8 (Burton) report completed by the California Transportation Commission in 1999 identified $11 billion in unmet needs on the city street and county road system. The report found that this need would grow by $400 million a year, if new revenues were not directed to this critical system. None of this backlog includes the needs of routine maintenance, operation, safety and system expansion. None of this backlog can be funded with existing revenue. California is losing its investment in the local street and road network. California taxpayers have invested almost $100 billion in city streets and county roads. Many local jurisdictions are unable to keep up with the potholes and are falling short of meeting even 50 percent of their preservation needs. Failing to protect this investment will jeopardize the most utilized portion of the State's transportation system. How Did This Problem Start? Beginning with the inception of the state gas tax in 1923, the first nine -cents of the gas tax was equitably distributed with 49 percent allocated to cities and counties and 51 percent allocated to the state. In 1990 there was an additional nine -cent increase in the state gas tax. As a result, cities and counties looked forward to prosperous times for the condition of their local street and road network. Unfortunately, rather than the traditional 51/49 split with the state, in 1990 cities and counties' share dropped significantly to a 77/23 percent split. Therefore, cities and counties only received 2.07 cents of the last nine -cent increase; this brings their total in the year 2000 to only 6.4 cents in comparison to the state's share of 11.6 cents of the total 18 -cent gas tax. This has made it impossible to keep up with the maintenance and rehabilitation needs of the local street and road network, which relies heavily on this source of revenue. This inequity has resulted in nearly a $3 billion loss to cities and counties—the lifeline for maintaining the local system. What's Our Record of Spending These Dollars? Cities and counties have an impeccable record of spending gas tax dollars on transportation needs; 98 percent of monies controlled directly on an annual basis over the last 10 years has been put to work on the street and road system. The Bottom Line Preventive maintenance now will avoid future reconstruction costs that are four to five times more costly. Additional monies must be directed to this critical problem, or taxpayer costs will dramatically increase in the near future. The Solution To deliver at least $500 million in new monies each and every year (on-going) directly to cities and counties each and every year to stop the further decline and deterioration of our streets and roads. #11 2 3/17/00 1 • • Exactly How Strong is the California Economy? What kind of California economy has produced what is now estimated to be a $9 to 11 billion dollar surplus? According to the State Department of Finance (DOF), it is a strong and solid economy. A recent DOF issue of Economic Indicators examined industry employment over the past decade and predicted a stable, healthy economic future. Recently, unemployment rates have dropped close to the national average. New jobs driving the employment growth represent a diversification across a broad spectrum of industries, offering promise for California's economic future. The November -December 1999 report is available on the Department's website, www.dofca.gov. Decline in Unemployment. In the last quarter of 1999, unemployment rates declined to the lowest in 30 years. California rates lagged behind national averages with the largest gap of 2.8 percent in May 1994, dipping to .07 in November 1999. Recent employment growth has been fueled by the construction industry, exports and personal consumption. The service industry added the largest number of jobs with business services with computer and Internet related businesses leading the way. Shifts in the Economic Base. In addition to the expansion in the number of jobs, California experienced a diversification of employment in economically promising industries. At the start of the 1990s California relied on federal defense spending and the aerospace industry for much of its economic base. During the decade, expansion in the high tech, apparel and transportation industries has picked up the decline in defense and aerospace jobs. The report forecasts the economic stability and growth in California's future based on two key indicators. To evaluate potential economic growth in a region, economists look at the percentage .of ".export -oriented" industries the region has as opposed to "population -serving" industries. States with strong export oriented industries produce and ship to other areas goods and services with the potential of economic growth. At the same time, reliance on exports leave states vulnerable to national and global economic cycles. Industry shifts in California have been strongest in these "export -oriented" areas, providing the state with high paying jobs and a positive economic outlook. The report also used a "location quotient" (LQ), the state ratio of individual industry employment to total state employment, as compared with the same ratio on the national level. Location quotients for industries within the state are then analyzed as to whether they are above, below or average, compared to the national ratio. The following lists characteristics and implications of California's leading industries based on these two factors. • Manufacturing. In the durable goods section, the high paying electronics and aerospace industries rank above average, while the "smoke stack" industries are below average. In nondurable goods, apparel and petroleum refining rise above average. As a vibrant export -oriented industry, the apparel industry has grown over the last decade as other regions decline. The size of California's petroleum refining industry correlates specifically to its geographic isolation from other producers and additive requirements unique to California. #11 3 3/17/00 • • • Services. Service industry categories have high LQs in both export oriented and population -serving areas. The motion picture industry leads the way in exported services. A surprising statistic is the below-average LQ in the health services category. The report cites California's early adoption of managed care for this factor. • Government. The proportion of government employment overall is above the national average. However; individual sectors do not follow national trends. Federal and state employment is below-average and local government exceeds the national average, driven by education employment. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, California lost 220,000 jobs in aerospace and 56,000 civilian jobs in federal base closures crippling the local economy. The report concludes that California's shift to jobs with export -oriented positions in the technology. Apparel industry and entertainment industry prepare the state for economic growth and stability in the future. TABLE OF CONTENTS REVENUE AND TAXATION 1) AB 2188 (Baldwin); SB 1377 (Haynes). Sales Tax Free Internet. Oppose. 2) AB 2412 (Migden). Internet Sales. Nexus. "Clicks and Mortar" Obligation Clarified. Support. FEDERAL ACTIVITIES H.R. 2372 (Canady, R -FL). Federal Takings. Loss of Local Control. Oppose. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES REVENUE AND TAXATION 1) AB 2188 (Baldwin); SB 1377 (Haynes). Sales Tax Free Internet! League Position: Oppose!!! Status: Hearing on SB 1377: Wednesday, March 29, Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee Action: Call/Write Members to Oppose SB 1377 and AB 2188 Senator Ray Haynes and Assembly Member Steve Baldwin have introduced identical measures to create a sales tax haven for Internet transactions. Both measures would simply state that no sales tax applies'for the sale or consumption of any tangible personal property ordered over the Internet within California. When asked whether it was the authors' intent that an auto dealer or Sears could put an Internet terminal in their store or showroom and allow the buyer to avoid #11 4 3/17/00 • • paying sales tax, the answer was: YES. The impact of this proposal is huge. Cities, counties, public safety, schools, and the State General Fund all would see a dramatic reduction in revenues if SB 1377 and AB 2188 are enacted. These could be the most fiscally damaging pieces of legislation considered by the Legislature this year. Cities need to react immediately and loudly that these measures are extremely harmful and must be strongly opposed. Cities should especially contact Members of the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee to voice their strong opposition on SB 1377. Cities from districts of co- authors of these measures should make a special effort to contact those Legislators to express their extreme displeasure with their members' support of these efforts. Co-authors of SB 1377 are: Johannessen, Knight, Monteith, Morrow, Baldwin, Bates, House, Kaloogian, Leach, Olberg, Pescetti, and Strickland. Cities should inform the members what an elimination of sales tax revenue would mean to their citizens and the services you provide. SB 1377 is scheduled to be heard on Wednesday, March 29 in the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee. If they don't hear from you, they'll assume a tax-free Internet is okay with cities. (See Committee membership after Legislative Activities in this Bulletin.) [League Staff: David Jones] AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 2) AB 2412.. (Migden). Internet Sales. Nexus. "Clicks and Mortar" Obligation Clarified. League Position: Support In the race to evade sales taxes, new creative endeavors are flourishing and the Internet has provided the perfect vehicle for the most creative. For example, Barnes and Noble have many stores in California; they clearly have established "nexus" or a physical presence here and under California law are required to collect and remit sales taxes on purchases. Barnesandnoble.com, and other "dot com" iterations created recently by existing retailers are clearly attemptsto claim they can have it both ways. They can be in California and have a separate subsidiary/affiliate that is located elsewhere and thus not have a sales or use tax collection obligation for sales, which occur over the web. Barnes and Noble stores take returns, do joint advertising and do many other services for their "dot com" affiliate. AB 2412 would clarify that the processing of orders electronically, by fax, telephone, the Internet, and other electronic ordering process, does not relieve a retailer of responsibility for collection of the tax from the purchaser if the retailer is engaged in business in this state. AB 2412 would also clarify that a retailer is engaged in business in this state if the retailer is related to a retailer maintaining sales locations in this state, provided the retailer sells similar products under a similar name as the California retailer, or facilities or employees of the related California retailer are used to advertise or promote sales by the retailer to California purchasers. AB 2412 is an issue of fairness. This is why Macy's and Walmart, who collect and remit sales taxes, are supporting this measure. The bill has been assigned to the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee for hearing (date for hearing not yet determined). City officials need to help support this clarification of the law, which will help stem the bleeding of local sales tax revenues. AB 2412 will require the Board of Equalization to enforce the current laws on the books regarding nexus and sales tax collection for these companies. AB 2412 would do nothing to Amazon.com However, it is a step in the right direction, and should be supported. (See Committee membership after Legislative Activities in this Bulletin.) [League Staff: David Jones] #11 5 3/17/00 • • LIST OF COMMITTEES REFERRED TO IN THIS WEEK'S BULLETIN ASSEMBLY REVENUE AND TAXATION COMMITTEE: Knox (D)(Chair), Kaloogian (R)(Vice Chair), Alquist (D), Aroner (D), Ducheny (D), Honda (D), Olberg (R), and Romero (D). SENATE REVENUE AND TAXATION COMMITTEE: Chesbro (D)(Chair), Poochigian (R)(Vice Chair), Alpert (D), Bowen (D), Burton (D), Johnston (D), Knight (R), and McPherson (R). ****************************** FEDERAL ACTIVITIES H.R. 2372 (Canady, R -FL). Federal Takings. Loss of Local Control. Update: Measure Passes House. Action Now in the Senate. Action: Contact Senators Feinstein and Boxer. H.R. 2372 passed the House of Representatives early Thursday evening by a vote of 226 to 182. If enacted, this bill would permit a developer to sue a city in federal court based upon a "takings" claim if they believe a decision on a project was not made within a "reasonable time." An editorial in the March 16 Los Angeles Times clearly sums up the problems with the bill. "The bill is being sold to House members as a noncontroversial procedural fix. It is far more than that. If enacted, it will interfere with the historical rights of the communities to decide how their land should be used. It would uproot a system that encourages local officials and land developers to negotiate solutions to disputesover use restrictions. In many cases, developers wouldn't even have to go through administrative appeals channels." The Times concludes its editorial this way. "Sponsors of the bill [the National Association of Home Builders] clearly failed to show that state laws and local authorities do not adequately protect the property rights of land owners and developers or that state courts are not competent to deal with property -use disputes. The bill, opposed by the federal courts themselves, the Department of Justice, most state attorneys general, city and county associations, environmental groups and historical societies, has no merit and goes against this Congress' self-proclaimed role of the guardian of states rights against federal intrusion. The House should reject it." Unfortunately, the House did not heed the Times advice. However, the House vote on H.R. 2372 was closer than the vote two years ago on a similar. bill, HR. 1534, which passed 248 to 178 and ultimately stalled. This demonstrates progress in educating members about the bill's real impacts on local governments and our communities. The League opposes H.R. 2372 because it would allow a project proponent to make an end run around the local negotiation process and file suit in federal court when they decide that a final decision was not reached within a "reasonable time." If a project proponent knows that they simply need one denial to proceed to federal court, they lose all incentive to propose and negotiate projects that are consistent with local planning and land use goals. H.R. 2372 is a bad bill because it would: • Shift the authority to decide local land use issues from the state and local levels to federal courts. #11 6 3/17/00 • • • Allow developers and others to sue cities in federal court without adequately encouraging the resolution of such disputes outside the courtroom, thereby undercutting local land use control, decision-making and authority. • Deem "ripe" for adjudication cases in which there is an insufficient factual record for the decision, thus raising the risk of poorly informed rulings. Action on the issue now moves to the Senate. Senator Orin Hatch is expected to move his S. 1028, which California Senators Feinstein and Boxer are on record opposing. We encourage cities to write Senators Feinstein and Boxer to thank them for their opposition and ask them to press their colleagues to oppose the bill. Cities are to be congratulated on their efforts to educate their Representatives on the real effects of H.R. 2372. Keep up the good work! (Note: If you are interested in how your Member of Congress voted, the House roll call vote should be available within a few days on the Thomas website for federal legislation. It can be reached through the League's website (www.cacities.org). Click on Legislative Services and scroll down to -click on "Thomas Web Site? Search for HR 2372, as reported from the House March 16, 2000.) (Referred to previously in Bulletins #5-00, 7-00 and 10-00.) [League Staff: Yvonne Hunter] #11 7 3/17/00 March 22, 2000 • • City of 2-termosa 1�3. eaclt.� The Honorable Gray Davis Governor of the State of California State Capitol Building Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Davis: Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 I am writing to request that you consider an ongoing allocation of $500 million to cities and counties to maintain and repair local streets and roads. The condition of local streets and roads is of vital importance to our residents and visitors. The continued growth of the California economy depends on sound transportation facilities and local streets and roads are an integral part of the overall state plan. This is the time to make the improvement in our continued growth by ensuring that our streets and roads are maintained in a serviceable manner. Again, I would urge you on behalf of the Hermosa Beach City Council, to make a commitment to all California cities and counties of an annual allocation of $500 million for local streets and roads. Sincerely, Julie Oakes Mayor JO:rem • March 22, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 MUNICIPAL WATER CONSUMERS ALLIANCE FOR REFORM OF WATER REPLENISHIIIENT DISTRICT Recommendation: That the City Council consider becoming a member of the Alliance (no cost membership). Background: I have attached a letter from the Mayors of Artesia, Cerritos, Lakewood, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs and Signal Hill. The purpose of the Alliance is to achieve reform of the Water Replenishment District. A copy of the state audit report is attached along with other information supplied by the cities. Respe fully submitted, Stepheurrell City Manager • • Gity of Downey CITY COUNCIL KEITH McCARTHY MAYOR JOYCE L. LAWRENCE MAYOR PRO TEM ROBERT C. WINNINGHAM COUNCIL MEMBER MEREDITH H. PERKINS COUNCIL MEMBER GARY P. McCAUGHAN,M.D. COUNCIL MEMBER CITY MANAGER GERALD M. CATON CITY CLERK -TREASURER JUDITH E. McDONNELL Mr. Stephen Burrell City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mr. Burrell: E I CrireBAR 1 4 2000 FUTURE UNLImaty OFFICE - CITY- Re: Municipal Water Consumers Alliance for Reform of Water Replenishment District In recent years, many of the cities within the Water Replenishment District of Southem California (WRD) have become concemed about the WRD's mismanagement and the cost burden that excessive WRD assessments have put on their water consumers. Water suppliers in many cities must charge their customers 5% to 10% more because of the wasteful expenditures of the WRD. A prime example of excessive spending can be seen in the district's response last year to our initial concems regarding their operations. The WRD proceeded to hire ten lobbying and public relations firms (at a cost to ratepayers of $100,000 a month) to counter our efforts to enact change. Because of the past behavior of the leadership of the WRD, and continuing disclosures of the WRD's fiscal irresponsibility, we have joined together to seek reform of the district. We have initiated legal and legislative actions, and some of us have begun the LAFCO process to withdraw from the WRD and form a Joint Powers Authority to carry out water replenishment responsibilities. We now are forming the Municipal Water Consumers Alliance to spearhead efforts to reform the WRD. Responsible cities, businesses, private water companies, environmentalists, employee organizations, and taxpayers must work together to achieve the reforms the WRD hierarchy is fighting. A recent report by the State Auditor documents in painful detail a long-standing pattem of fiscal abuse and mismanagement at the WRD, findings which the WRD continues to dispute. The audit report and media coverage of the district's response reveal an agency out of control and unlikely to begin genuine reform on its own. We hope that you will read the documentation that accompanies this letter, particularly the summary of the State Auditor's report. (The full report is on the Internet at www.bsa.ca.Qov/bsa/1999). It is clear that the district's assessment policies and massive reserves put a costly burden on your water consumers. If you agree, we request that you join us as a member of the Municipal Water Consumers Alliance and lend your support to WRD reform. There is no membership fee for joining the Alliance. Please use the enclosed reply card to inform us of your decision. We will keep you supplied with a steady stream of information as this issue progresses. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact or call Douglas Jeffe or Christine Lewis at the Alliance number (310-215-0234). Sincerely, Keith McCarthy Mayor H:\CMANAGERIJMY\wrd\WRDRecr2.doc 11111 BROOKSHIRE AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 7016 DOWNEY, CALIFORNIA 90241-7016 www.downeyca.org Page 2 Municipal Water Consumers Alliance Municipal Water Consumers Alliance Representatives Mayor City of Artesia Mayor City of Lakewoo M. or City of Santa Fe Springs A6"k- --*)‘L Mayor City of Cerritos ayor City of Pic. era 4.11.44.4.fi Mayor City of Signal Hil Municipal Water Consumers Alliance Objectives of the Alliance The Water Replenishment District of Southern California has unnecessarily burdened water users and water purveyors with excessive assessments that have resulted from the WRD's mismanagement and out -of - control spending. To protect the interest of their residents and communities, a number of cities within the boundaries of the WRD have organized the Municipal Water Consumers Alliance to work for top -to -bottom reform of the WRD's fiscal policies and for genuine accountability of the WRD's management. Long Beach„Press Telegram ■ Enactment of state legislation that will mandate the State Auditor's recommendations: 1. Mandatory refund to purveyors of excess WRD assessments 2. Application of administrative codes to the WRD, including contracting and procurement requirements 3. Limitation on the excessive accumulation of reserve funds. 4. Requirement for cost benefit analyses of proposed capital projects The Alliance's objectives include: • Reduction of water replenishment assessments from $139 per acre-foot of replenishment water to $100. ■ A 50% reduction in WRD's administrative expenses. • Review and approval of WRD capital expenditures by the West Basin and Central Basin Water Districts. • Exclusion of cities withdrawing from WRD through the LAFCO process from liability for WRD capital outlays after the date of filing their withdrawal petitions. • A two-year moratorium on issuance of bonds by the WRD. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION • • THE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Fact Sheet: The Need for Reform Where It Started The Regional Water Replenishment District (WRD) was created by the Legislature in 1959 to serve water users in two major groundwater basins in Southern California. Its mission was singular: to replenish groundwater in the basins to ensure a sufficient supply of groundwater for the future. To fund its operations, the WRD was given the authority to set and collect assessments on each acre-foot of water pumped from the basins each year, and to use that money to purchase surface water from other water sources to replenish what had been: pumped. Some 30 years later, in 1990, the WRD's role was broadened by the Legislature to permit the district to engage in water quality protection projects, at the district's discretion. Dollars to fund these "clean water" programs are added to the assessments. The WRD does not make assessments directly on the consumer. Rather, it collects money from the cities and other entities entitled to pump from the basins and supply the consumer. In the end, however, the consumer pays for WRD ARMY activities in the price of their water. AMOK Where It Has Gone WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA "If you want the sorry history of the Water Replenishment District, check out the bill of particulars hashed out at Thursday's (WRD) board meeting...Among the issues: a four person staff has mushroomed to 29 and water rates have skyrocketed. In addition to lobbyists and publicists, the WRD wants to make it payday for lawyers as it fends off four lawsuits...Do we really want the meter running on all of this?" Press -Telegram editorial While the activities of the WRD paid for by water users—have helped to protect groundwater supplies over the years, the recent history of the district is far from what was envisioned by the legislation that created it. With no direct oversight by the state or any other agency, the WRD has set its own course. As a result: • WRD assessments on water users have increased 300% since 1991 with no significant increases in services provided. • WRD's assessments are adding as much as 30% to an average household's water bill. • Instead of returning unspent surpluses to water users in the form of lower annual assessments, the district has amassed an unspent surplus that reached $67 million in 1998 and WRD: Fact Sheet Page 2 is still approximately $50 million. • The number of full-time WRD employees has increased from only eight in 1991 to 22 today. Most of the new staff are not the technical people needed to help the district accomplish its mission. The administrative costs have doubled in just four years. • WRD's budget outlay includes the services of 10 outside lobbying and public relations firms, at a cost of $70,000 to $100,000 per month. • The district has embarked on an ambitious program of capital expenditures and water sales that many contend are outside its legal authority and duplicate the responsibilities and activities of other existing agencies. • The California State Auditor calls current assessments for "clean water" programs "unjustifiable" and raises serious questions about the viability of the district's two major capital projects. Instead of producing a savings of $1.2 million as estimated by the district, the Auditor concludes that one of these projects could actually produce a $4 million loss. • Responding to a lawsuit filed by eight cities assessed by the WRD, a judge ruled against WRD's plan to place an additional $34 million bond burden on water users to finance capital projects, finding its bond financing plan unlawful. • Seeking relief from inflated assessments and potentially illegal use of public funds by the WRD, numerous cities are looking to the courts and to the Legislature to help bring the WRD under control. Some are considering outright withdrawal from the district as a means of lowering water costs. Intense Scrutiny is Warranted Cities served by the WRD are not alone in their concern about the district's mismanagement. At the request of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, in 1999, the Bureau of State Audits conducted a review of district management practices. Among other things, the Auditor found: assessment rates have not been calculated properly; the WRD's reserves are excessive; administrative expenses are not adequately documented or controlled, and the contracting and procurement policies of the district are deficient. The district also has come under scrutiny by the state's Little Hoover Commission and the Fair Political Practices Commission. • • WRD: Fact Sheet Page 3 Reform is Badly Needed The Municipal Water Consumers Alliance is working on behalf of communities in Southern California to achieve meaningful reform of the WRD, including: • A reduction in WRD assessment rates, which are ultimately paid by the consumer • Legislative enactment of reforms recommended by the State Auditor, including mandatory refunds of excess assessments, reasonable limits on future reserves, and responsible contracting and procurement procedures • A reduction in WRD administrative expenses and review of proposed capital expenditures based on true cost -benefit analyses • A moratorium on the issuance of bonds incurring future indebtedness for water ratepayers • A method of future oversight that ensures the future accountability of the district to the communities it is meant to serve • Press -Telegram 604 Pine Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90844 Telephone (562) 435-1161 A MediaNews Group newspaper Sunday, February 13 Shrinking water district Secession: Long Beach, too, wants out of the WRD's expensive clutches. Another big nail got hammered in the Water Replenishment District's cof- fin last week when the Long Beach Board of Water Commissioners recom- mended that the city secede from the trou- bled groundwater agency. It's impossible to overstate the signifi- cance of this move. In the battle between WRD and the cities it serves, Long Beach had been one of the moderates. Long Beach had quietly shared neigh- bors' concerns that the WRD's mission of restocking and preserving underground water wells had been compromised by mushrooming water rates, excessive reserves and questionable financial prac- tices. But while cities like Downey and Lakewood were filing lawsuits, pushing reform bills and fomenting secession, Long Beach had stayed largely on the sidelines, reluctantly providing political cover for the WRD. Long Beach had teamed up on one of the WRD's prized endeavors — the Alamitos Barrier project, which uses treated water in order to prevent saltwater from contami- nating the region's underground wells. But like other cities that had tried to work out its differences with the agency, Long Beach water officials finally lost patience. A key issue in the split was the WRD's continued efforts to saddle ratepayers with bond debt to pay for the Alamitos Barrier effort, defying six months of pleas from Long Beach. The Long Beach city auditor's office told the water board last week that this was one of those situations where bond financing makes no sense. The WRD has overcharged ratepayers over the years and built up a massive reserve that could more than pay for the project. The state's WRD audit says that the Alamitos Barrier effort might raise water bills (not lower them). The city auditor's office suggests that quashing the bond issue is the single most effective step to ensure the financial viability of the project. The water board's secession request now goes to the Long Beach City Council. We presume that the council will reach the same conclusions that most of us have — the WRD is in need of radical surgery. The secessionist cause now includes Cerritos, Downey, Lakewood, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs and Signal Hill. Norwalk and Artesia will take formal action within a few weeks. Other cities are also expressing interest. Since the WRD neither oversees pump- ing rights nor replenishes groundwater itself, these cities figure that a joint powers authority could accomplish much the same purposes without the current headaches. Despite . its symbolic importance, seces- sion plans would take years for these peti- tions to work their way through the Local Agency Formation Commission. The importance of Long Beach's move would be to lend heft to WRD reform bills currently in the hopper, such as a measure by Assemblywoman Sally Havice that would adopt a state auditor's recommenda- tion that its reserve be slashed to $10 mil- lion. As significant as secession seems, the more significant move might be the Long Beach water board's endorsement of AB 1794 by Assemblyman.Thomas Calderon. At this point, our cities are in bondage to an elected board that answers not to water customers, but to an uninterested, unin- formed electorate. By giving board repre- sentation to water providers, AB 1794 would break the chains and stop the need for secession in the first place. • Press -Telegram 604 Pine Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90844 Telephone (562) 435-1161 A MediaNews Group newspaper End WRD as we know it Water. Changing the type of governance is the answer. Until recently, only a handful of water and local government officials were aware of the Water Replenishment District's obscure groundwater mission: _setting rates for restocking wells; cleaning up contamination and battling seawater intrusion. • But now the WRD has become a whip- ping post for the State Legislature. The WRD brought this on itself by an unrepentant, arrogant attitude that creat- ed a ballooning army of staffers and lobby- ists, exploding water rates, lax fiscal over- sight and a congenital inability to act like an accountable public agency. One holdover bill from last session by State Senator Richard Mountjoy would require annual audits of the agency. It might even be turned into an urgency mea- sure so that the audits can take place immediately. •• Another proposal floating about would •implement the recommendations of a :scathing state audit. • And Cerritos Assemblywoman Sally Havice is introducing language that would allow cities to opt out of the WRD, and not be liable for any debts incurred after they : give notice. Let's hope lawmakers also set a cap on • that nettlesome surplus that WRD is -allowed to accumulate. :- The only long-term solution is to replace :the elected board. And that's the approach -that Democratic Assemblyman Thomas Calderon has taken with AB 1794. :: The board members know that only the 'Voters can remove them. When voters yawn :about picking the leader of the free world, vvhy would they care about a water board :race? _. In 1998, former Downey mayor Diane :Boggs ran on a platform of WRD reform. :Virtually no one listened. No wonder WRD board members WRD officials wage war on the cities they serve with platoons of lobbyists and lawyers paid out of the cities' water fees. With no threat of ballot box reprisal, it easy for board uembers to withhold information from cities (or even dissenting board members), lir to plow ahead with policies that offend a large number of communities. . The ideal WRD board would be a bunch of technocrats and water experts. And that's what you would largely get under AB 1794, which creates a seven -member board elected by the municipal and private water companies that pump water from under- -ground. These pumpers have a built-in interest in ensuring that their customers get inex- pensive, high-quality groundwater. They don't want to drain the basins dry. That would only leave them more reliant on expensive piped -in water. The change would take place next January, long before most of the current terms expire. This is apparently legal, since the WRD election process was established by the state Legislature, not the California Constitution. Calderon's plan is similar to the struc- ture used by the San Gabriel Valley water master, a nine -person, court-appointed board that manages to keep administrative expenses under control with little contro- versy. Such models are generally the norm; the WRD's all -elected board is the anomaly. Despite the WRD's claim to uniqueness, there are agencies all over the state that deal to varying degrees with court -adminis- tered pumping rights and water quality. And the WRD doesn't replenish ground- water itself. Like San Gabriel, it hires the county to do the job. WED critics say that a couple of existing board members are simply good people caught up in a bad system. If AB 1794 became law, a couple of well-intentioned incumbents might still get a chance to serve. If they continued to take a high-handed attitude toward local water providers, they could kicked out after one year. And since it would abolish the cushy $100 -a -meeting stipend that has been milked under the current regime, the new board would be more likely to attract water experts than political hacks. And to cut down on some of the notorious abuses of the past, any contract over $5,000 would require competitive bidding. Another nice touch — the post of general manager would be replaced with one of chief engineer, driving home the point that the WRD's top staffer should be a techni- cian, not a political animal. Among those enlisting in the cause are State Senator Betty Karnette and Assemblyman Alan Lowenthal. While the WRD likes to suggest that the revolt is con- fined to the southeast area, the co-authors include San Gabriel Valley lawmakers, plus Torrance Assemblyman George Nakano and the L.A. West Side's redoubtable Sheila Kuehl. The WRD hasn't taken a position on these bills. If they don't want to board this freight train, then they should at least jump out of the way. • Press Telegram 02/15/00 Water board rebuffs auditor Oversight District won't re-evaluate rates. By Nada Raouf Staff writer CERRITOS - An embattled groundwater maintenance board Monday rejected several recom- mendations a state auditor sug- gested to improve its operations. The Water Replenishment Dis- trict, which maintains the clean- ing and refilling of the groundwa- ter under 43 local cities in I.os Angeles County, has been facing criticism from several area cities for problems, including high rates. The auditor's report accused the district of failing to control expenses while overchargingcities and of failing to control employee expenses, among other concerns cited in the 79 -page report The report criticized the district for having kept water costs high to member cities while it collected wore funds than it needed to buy eoundwatcr, resulting in re- serves of $67 million inJune 1998. Among the recommendations the district rejected: • A suggestion to change the way they determine their assess- ment rates to cities for water pumping, except to re-evaluate fund reserves annually. • A suggestion to reduce the district's target reserve to $10 million to more closely reflect its budgeted operations. • A suggestion to prepare cost - benefit analyses for budgeting capital projects. • A recommendation to ensure a valid contract is in place before paying for services. The district accepted the fol- lowing recommendations: • Suggested changes regarding travel expenses. Travel within the state will continue to be approved by the board president asitistaw, but out-of-state travel will be decided by the full board. • In response to a recom, tion that the board reaspyts need for 10 Legislative and public advocacy firms, the board voted that at least every 60 days, it will reassess its need for lobbying. Several city officials were par- ticularly disappointed by the board's failure to limit reserves. "1 was disappointed that they felt the $l0 minion (reserve limit) was something they didn't want to do anything about," said Desi Alvarez, Downey director of pub- lic works. "Reserves and setting rates, those are what cost people money." • "We felt our projects are differ- ent from each other. so ... a benefit -analysis may be not appro- priate," said district spokeswom- an Kathy Jones Kish. • The WRD is a serial taxpayer abuser Just days after the California Bureau of Audits revealed that the Water Replenishment District of Southern California is a waste- ful, out -of -control agency, the board members of the WRD pre- pared to adopt a mind-boggling employee "bonus" plan. It would have given hefty cash awards to the same staff members the audit report criticized for lax accounting and authorizing dubious expenditures. Fortunately, a timely editorial in the Press -Telegram (Dec. 23), helped stall that instance of the WRD's persistent taxpayer abuse. But the district is a seri- al abuser, and now the WRD board has rubber-stamped a stats' proposal to host a "water dialogue conference" that would soak the residents of the replen- ishment district again. The staff report for the con- -ference estimates its planning costs at $51,195. More than $40,000 of the total is consul- tants' fees for organizing the conference and helping with event logistics and $10,000 is allocated to the cost of designing and mailing invitations and making hotel arrangements. Expensive souvenirs for partici- pants, fees for speakers, and the cost of hosting board members at the conference hotel are not included in the estimate. As the state audit report noted, the WRD has 10 public relations and lobbying firms on its payroll, at a cost to taxpayers of $100,000 a month. The audit report called the number of PR firms "excessive." If nothing else, planning a lavish conference gives the consultants something else to do (besides stall the WRD reform bills that are currently moving through the state Legislature). The WRD is a bloated and abusive agency. It's also clueless. In the face Press Telegram Sunday, February 6, 2000 of overwhelming evidence of its mis- . management, the WRD intends to tell the state's water experts how to plan for California's water needs. The WRD shouldn't even try. Each year, existing regional and statewide water agencies and associ- ations offer a wide range of forums and conferences for discussing Southern California's critical water issues. These associations — among them the Metropolitan Water District, the Association of California Water Agencies, the Water Education Foundation, the American Water Works Association, and the West and Central Basin water associations — have earned the confidence of con- sumers and water experts, not the discredited WRD. Among the many faults the Bureau of State Audits found in the WRD was its habit of hosting elabo- rate breakfasts in the months before board members were up for election. Expensive, taxpayer -funded crystal glasses and other gifts were awarded to all the participants at these "edu- cational" events. The audit criticized these expenditures, and the state Fair Political Practices Commission is currently investigating the dis- trict's spending for these questionable events. A conference that gives WRD board members the opportunity to wine and dine potential supporters fits the WRD's reputation for serial taxpayer abuse. Now you know why a growing number of cities in the dis- trict are saying, "We want reform of the WRD, or we want out!" Joseph Esquivel Mayor Lakewood Press Telegram 02/29/00 Water manager suspended District: Agency action follows state audit, criticism. By John Canalis Stat( writer . CERRITOS — Under fire for a state audit that found it over- charged customers and failed to monitor employee expenses, the Water Replenishment District of Southern California has suspended its general manager. . District directors, meeting in closed session Friday, suspended Bob Campbell through March 17. Their decision was announced Monday. Campbell has been gen- eral manager for less than two years, district officials said. The water district is an agency that maintains future water sup- plies and sells water to local cities. "We took the action we took in the best interest of the district," said director and treasurer Leo Vander Lans. "We are going to further consider the matter at a meeting this Friday." Campbell could not be reached for comment. Personnel matters are handled confidentially, said district spokes- woman Kathy Jones Irish, explain- ing why no details were forthcom- ing. Tom Holliman, assistant general manager, will temporarily assume the district's day-to-day management. The district, which represents 43 Los Angeles County cities, has been criticized for a state audit report released in December that found it overcharged customers, overesti- mated water needs, maintained excessive cash reserves and did not closely monitor employee expenses. District spending practices have increased water assessments 300 percent since 1991, according to the state study. Auditors showed that the district accumulated a $67 million reserve in 10years although the state recommends only $10 million. Several of the district's customer cities, including Ceeritos, Downey, Lakewood, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs and Signal Hill, have begun the process of withdrawing from the district. The suspension of Campbell should not relieve the district board of its responsibility, local officials said. "I think it might be an attempt to make some kind of change, but a cosmetic change like this, for what- ever reason, is not enough," said state Assemblywoman Sally Hav- ice, D -Bellflower, who has intro- duced three bills to reform the replenishment district. "WRD needs to follow and ad- here to the recommendations of the audit reports (from) last year," she said. "Until then, 1 do not see any improvement in policy." Press Telegram 02/29/00 The price of reform WRD: Board puts Campbell on leave. Iis never a happy occasion to see someone in danger of losing his job, but that may be the price of reform for the Water Replenishment District. On Friday, the WRD board placed General Manager Bob Campbell on administrative leave through March 17. Board members were mum about the inci- dents that played a factor in its decision. We suspect Campbell hardly helped his cause by prominently displaying his middle fmger to Downey City Councilwoman Joyce Lawrence while adjusting his glasses at a recent meeting. In these situations, the usual scenario is for the targeted bureaucrat and his allies to protest loudly while his lawyer negotiates the best sev- erance package possible. A political animal whose previous job had been a posting at the California Science Center, Campbell nevertheless proved to be a quick study who managed to talk a good game about groundwater issues. Ideally, he would have left on his own. But now that a forced departure looms, it would not be a good sign for the board to back down when it takes up the matter again Friday. We would hope that there aren't any Sacramento lawmakers who would be so craven as to kill off WRD reform bills in return for the WRD board allowing Campbell to keep his job. While Campbell's ouster is symbolically pow- erful, many of our cities' biggest complaints don't involve Campbell, but the board itself. The board has been making some promising moves as of late. It has rescinded a dubious decision to go into debt to pay for the Alamitos Barrier project. It also agreed to open the agency's books to the city auditor for Long Beach. The WRD also turned a cold shoulder to a business -as -usual proposal by board member Willard Murray to hold a posh $11,000 hotel reception for outgoing Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa. Now it needs to go further. It needs to stop spending $100,000 a month on all those lobby- ing firms. It needs to reduce its reserves and cut the fees that drive up water bills throughout the southeast area. • . WHAT THE CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR SAYS ABOUT THE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT In late 1999, at the request of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, the Bureau of State Audits examined policies and practices of the Water Replenishment District (WRD) relative to setting assessment rates and using public funds. The following excerpts are quoted directly from the Auditor's report: "The District Overestimates Its Financial Needs When It Sets Annual Assessments for Water Replenishment." "The district has increased groundwater levels, but it also has amassed excessive surpluses." "...it has consistently collected more than it needs for its water purchases..." "...by June 30, 1998, the district had accumulated approximately $67 million in its unreserved fund balance." L a ifornia State Au ito Water Replenishment District of Southern California: Wink Polities and Poor Planning Have Led to Excessive Water Rata and QaaUonabkExpenses (i-itntxr 1999 "Assessment rates are not calculated appropriately." "...for more than ten years, the district has consistently overcharged the entities that use basin groundwater." "...with the exception of one year, revenues continually exceeded expenditures from fiscal year 1991-92 to the present." "Each year the district has had leftover funds, which could have been used to offset costs in the following year." "The targeted reserve is excessive." "Clearly, a reserve fund targeted at $20 million is excessive." "...a maximum of $10 million in reserve funds is a more reasonable amount." "The District Poorly Plans and Administers Capital Improvements and Clean Water Projects." "Current rates for clean water programs are not justifiable." • WRD: State Bureau of Audits Report: Summary - Page 2 "Millions of dollars collected for clean water programs remain unspent" "Capital spending is neither documented nor structured appropriately" "...(the district) has not appropriately documented how it has funded specific projects, nor does it explain the methodology it employs to determine rate increases to pay for capital improvements." "Poor Analyses jeopardize capital improvement projects." `The cost -benefit analysis of the Alamitos Project is questionable." "By 2020, the district's estimated $1.2 million savings produced by the Alamitos project could actually be a $4 million loss." "Although construction is underway, it is not yet known whether the district will acquire the needed water rights for the Desalter Project." "The District Has Failed to Adequately Document and Control Administrative Expenses." "The district has no comprehensive policy concerning contracting and procurement procedures. 'Procurement policies are deficient." "Present procurement policies are not followed." "Although the proposed policy, as of October 25, 1999, expands existing policy...it is still deficient." "The district has inadequate controls over expenses." "...has not always documented expenses appropriately, nor has it consistently made fiscally sound decisions." "...may be paying for some inappropriate or imprudent expenses." "The district has not sufficiently controlled its personnel costs." "The need for additional staff has lacked sufficient and compelling justification." "Salary comparisons to justify salary increases are not always performed." • • WRD: State Bureau of Audits Report: Summary Page 3 "The district should reassess its use of consultants." "Even after adding staff positions, the district has increased its use of legislative, legal, engineering, and other consulting services." "...10 lobbying firms is an excessive number for a district with fewer than 30 staff members." Overall, the audit report concludes: "Weak Policies and Poor Planning Have Lead to Excessive Water Rates and Questionable Expenses" "...(W)e believe that the district's failure to maintain financial vigilance in its management illustrates the attitude that can result when an entity consistently has a substantial cash surplus from year to year and has not implemented effective controls." • • THE WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Questions and Answers about the WRD Q. WHY WAS THE WRD CREATED? A. In the late 1950s, when the WRD was created, the over -pumping of groundwater from the groundwater basins serving a large portion of Los Angeles County was a serious concern. The natural inflow of water to the basins from limited rainfall was not keeping pace with the amount of water that was being extracted. As a result, some wells had gone dry, and saltwater had begun to intrude into the basins' coastal areas. The WRD was created by the Legislature to manage the replenishment of these groundwater supplies. The WRD was given the responsibility to collect an assessment fee on water pumped from the basin by the holders of water rights and to purchase surface water from other sources to replenish the groundwater. WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Q. WHAT ARE THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT? A. The district covers two distinct water basins, the Central and West Coast groundwater basins. The district area totals 397 square -miles in Los Angeles County, stretching from the Whittier Hills on the north to Orange County on the east to Malibu and the Pacific Ocean on the south and west. Q. WHO CAN PUMP WATER FROM THE BASINS? A. Water rights in the Central and West Coast basins are based on a determination of the superior court (i.e. these are "adjudicated" rights) and are considered a real property. To pump groundwater, an entity must own or lease adjudicated water rights. These rights do not allow over -extraction and they require the replacement of extracted water. There are some 24 city water agencies, along with numerous privately held water companies, industries and private individuals with adjudicated water rights in the two basins. They all pay WRD assessments, based on the number of acre-feet of groundwater each has pumped. The assessment fulfills their obligation to replenish groundwater supplies. Q. DOES THE WRD HAVE ANY WATER RIGHTS? A. No. The WRD has no water rights, nor does it supply water directly to any residential or business customers. WRD: Questions and Answers Page 2 Q. DOES THE WRD HAVE RESPONSIBILITIES BEYOND WATER REPLENISHMENT? A. The district's primary responsibility is still the replenishment of groundwater supplies pumped by the entities holding water rights. In 1990, the Legislature somewhat broadened the district's role. The district, at its discretion, may engage in efforts that include the detection, prevention, and removal of groundwater contaminants. However, the State Water Code prohibits the district from duplicating facilities or providing services that could be performed more economically by other, existing public agencies. Q. DOES THE WRD PREVENT PUMPERS FROM "PUMPING THE BASIN DRY?" A. No. The basin's pumpers are limited in the amount of water they can extract through a Superior Court adjudication of the basin's water rights. Pumpers must report their extractions to a count appointed watermaster, not the WRD. If a pumper should fail to report the amount of their extraction or pump more than its adjudicated amount, the pumper must answer to the court, not the WRD. Q. DOES THE WRD DO THE ACTUAL, PHYSICAL REPLENISHMENT OF GROUNDWATER SUPPLIES? A. No. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works owns and operates the county's water spreading grounds, storm water systems, dams, and seawater intrusion barriers. The county does the actual replenishment of the groundwater in the basins with water purchased by the WRD through its assessments. The WRD collects fees. It does not pump water. Q. DOES THE WRD HAVE COMPLETE AUTONOMY TO SET WATER ASSESSMENT RATES? DO THE CITIES OR OTHER WATER PUMPERS HAVE ANY SAY? A. As a public agency, the district is required to take input from all affected or interested parties. However, the WRD board sets assessment rates and approves district expenditures. • • WRD: Questions and Answers Page 3 Q. WHO OVERSEES THE DISTRICT? WHO DOES IT ANSWER TO? A. The district's operations are directed by a five -member board elected by the residents of the Central Basin and the West Basin. The WRD was created by the Legislature. However, there is no state agency or other agency that actively oversees this district. Q. A NUMBER OF CITIES HAVE CHARGED THAT WRD'S ASSESSMENT RATES ARE FAR TOO HIGH AND HAVE ESCALATED AT AN ALARMING RATE IN RECENT YEARS. WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR THESE CHARGES? A. The cities believe—and a report by the California State Bureau of Auditors also concludes—that the WRD has consistently overestimated the amount of money required to: do its job. According to the Auditor, over a 10 -year period, the district has annually collected $1.8 million to $10.9 million more than it needed. Since 1991, WRD assessments on water users have increased by 300% with no significant increases in services provided. Q. WHAT HAS BECOME OF THE MONEY THAT WASN'T ACTUALLY NEEDED FOR WATER REPLENISHMENT? A. Some of the money has been spent to develop "clean water" programs; some has gone to pay for the district's administrative expenses, which have increased four -fold since 1991. During that time, WRD staff has increased from 8 to 22 full-time employees. Expenditures for outside lobbying and public relations consultants have mushroomed, too. In this fiscal year, the district is paying 10 such firms as much as $100,000 per month. Most of the money, however, has gone to surplus. By 1998, the WRD had amassed a surplus of $67 million dollars. While it has reduced its surplus somewhat since then, the district still has more than $50 million in unspent money collected from water users. Q. SHOULDN'T THE DISTRICT USE SURPLUS FUNDS TO REDUCE ASSESSMENTS IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS? A. The California State Auditor concluded that surplus funds could have been used to reduce assessments on water users and questioned why the district did not take that action. The Auditor concluded that even the district's stated goal of $20 million in surplus funds (which would be down significantly from the present $50 million surplus) was excessive. WRD: Questions and Answers Page 4 Q. • WHAT PROMPTED THE STATE TO AUDIT THE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF THE WRD? A. Water users who pay assessments to the WRD have become increasingly alarmed, not only by escalating assessment rates and district surpluses, but also by plans by the WRD to build expensive new capital improvement projects and a seeming lack of control on district expenditures at the expense of consumers. In May 1999, the cities of Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs, Downey, Lakewood, South Gate, Norwalk, Cerritos, Bell, Signal Hill, Paramount, Artesia, and the Central Basin Water Association asked State Senator Martha Escutia to request a state financial and performance audit of the district. The audit was performed at the formal request of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. The result is a report that justifies the cities' concerns and makes an urgent case for reform of the district. Q. WHAT ARE THE CITIES' CONCERNS—AND WHAT WERE THE STATE AUDITOR'S CONCLUSIONS—ABOUT THE WRD'S PLANNED CAPITAL PROJECTS? A. The two major projects in question both "clean water" projects—are the West Coast Desalinization Program (the Desalter Project) and the Alamitos Barrier Recycled Water Project (the Alamitos Project). With regard to the Alamitos Project, the State Auditor concluded that, because of a flawed analysis by the district, a $1.2 million savings could actually amount to a $4 million loss—of public money. The Auditor further noted that the district does not own the water rights it assumes for its $22 million Desalter Project. Nevertheless, without a competitive bid, the district has already awarded a contract to build it. A recent, independent engineering review of the $22 million project indicates that the project should cost only $11 million. The cities seriously question the cost, efficacy, and the legality of the Desalter Project, which would duplicate a West Coast Municipal Water District program that is already removing salt water from the West Basin. Q. THE WRD WAS PROPOSING TO SELL BONDS TO FINANCE SOME OF ITS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THOSE BONDS? A. In November, the Superior Court ruled that the district's plan to issue $34 million in bonds was illegal. The question was brought before the court by a number of cities served by the WRD, all of whom felt that an additional bond burden on ratepayers was unjustified, particularly in light of the $50 million surplus already held by the district. • • WRD: Questions and Answers Page 5 Q. WHAT ISSUES ARE BEING LOOKED AT BY THE LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION? THE FPPC? A. The Little Hoover Commission has conducted hearings and is evaluating the operation of the WRD as part of its study on California special districts. Questions about the possible misuse of public funds to further the political campaigns of incumbent, elected WRD board members have been brought before the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC). Q. SOME CITIES HAVE BEGUN A PROCESS THAT MAY ALLOW THEM TO DETACH FROM THE WRD. WHY? A. The cities of Downey, Lakewood, Signal Hill, Paramount, Santa Fe Springs, Pico Rivera and Cerritos have all initiated proceedings with the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) to request detachment from the WRD. The cities believe that they can replenish groundwater through a new joint powers authority for significantly less money than they are being assessed by the WRD for the service and that, if the WRD is allowed to continue on its present course, it would be in the best interests of their communities to take this action. Others may find it in their best interests to follow suit. Q. WOULD THE CITIES CONSIDER STAYING WITH THE WRD? A. Through the Municipal Water Users Alliance, the cities hope that meaningful reform of the WRD can be achieved. The Alliance has an active reform agenda that includes Legislative reforms backed by recommendations of the State Auditor. Assessments must be limited to the actual cost of replacement. Administrative costs must be capped. Cash reserves must be reduced to the levels recommended in the audit report. The Alliance believes that, for the district to continue, it must be accountable to the communities it serves. WRD: Questions and Answers Page 6 180 160 140 40 20 0 WRD Assessment Rate 1976-2000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $- WRD Cash Balances 1990-2000 Year Pe re ��' Pe 0c4x 04) �rO P•c:301 Peg) Pe $162 $162 $151 5151 5137 $133 5125 51"" ss� 571 571 $51 551 524 521 $21 524 w 524 16 516 516 527 �i� 9 1111111 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $- WRD Cash Balances 1990-2000 Year Pe re ��' Pe 0c4x 04) �rO P•c:301 Peg) Pe March 21, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS IN REDONDO BEACH - AES/HARBOR PROJECT Recommendation: Direct staffto send letter requesting to be included in the upcoming events. Background: As you know, Redondo Beach just completed a ULI study of these waterfront areas. The report, along with its suggestion for future actions by Redondo Beach, will be available in a month or so. Julie Oakes and I were interviewed by the ULI team. We expressed potential City of Hermosa Beach concerns about the direction that the projects might go if and when actual developments are proposed and considered. The overall suggestions made by the ULI team seemed to take our concerns into account. The next step for Redondo Beach is to hold a series of public meetings to get more specific input from residents, businesses, etc.. I believe that Redondo Beach would continue to welcome our participation and, as such, I would like to write a letter offering our participation at the appropriate time in the process. A number of our residents that live in the south end of town have asked what role Hermosa Beach will take and I believe that this would be a good approach to keeping up on the proposal as it develops. It may be quite a while before any real specific projects are proposed. Any specific projects will go through CEQA, Coastal Commission, etc.. Each step of the process provides opportunity for both the City Council and the public to provide input. Re • ectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager id ULI-Redondo Beach -- Comm. Meeting Public Meetings Page 1 of 1 ULI Final Presentation The ULI Panel held its Final Presentation on the morning of March 10, 2000 at the Crowne Plaza Hotel (300 N. Harbor Drive). The public viewed a presentation of the Panel's recommendations for land use and re -use in the study area (the AES Generating Station, the Harbor and Pier areas, and the west side of N. Catalina Avenue). In summary, the Panel encouraged more public space, a more efficient and pedestrian -friendly use of N. Harbor Drive, the creation of a "Catalina Corridor' entry to the Harbor, and effective use of the AES Generating Station to provide complementary uses and better access to the Harbor. Four sketches of their recommendations were unveiled and are presented below: (click on images for larger views) It is important to note that the Panel's recommendations are not final. However, their recommendations will serve as a basis for future community meetings regarding amendments to the City's General Plan, Harbor/Civic Center Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The City will hold many public meetings and hearings in the months to follow. See the schedule of meetings below. Upcoming Public Meetings Public meetings regarding future land use in the study area will be held at the following times on the dates indicated (locations are to be announced -- check back soon): Saturday, April 1, 2000 Saturday, April 29, 2000 Saturday, June 3, 2000 9AM 9AM 9AM Location TBA (check back soon) Location TBA (check back soon) Location TBA (check back soon) Everyone is invited and strongly encouraged to attend. http://www.redondo.org/harbor/ULlpublicmtg.htm 3/20/00 March 21, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of February 2000: Recreation Programming: Civic Theater Events: February 81-13 — "Forbidden Broadway", as performed by the Civic Light Opera of The South Bay Cities. February 19 A lecture, slide presentation, and art show by the Wearable Art Connection. February 26 - Sri Lanka Creative Arts Forum Performance, two -play drama for a crowd of 200. Recreation Classes: The first session of Spring classes began the end of the month. Popular children's classes included Skyhawks Minihawks sports, ballet/tap, Sports For Kids, and Youth Basketball. Attendance in adult classes is down, but Tennis and Yoga classes are popular, despite rain. Skate Track: The "Skate with A Semi -Pro Day" was well received as a first-time workshop (half of the class was rescheduled because of rain). About 40 children received specialized instruction from local professional skateboarders in areas in which they wished to improve. Fantastic drawing prizes were also available as a fundraiser for Skate Track supplies. Roller Hockey: (The scheduled Youth Roller Hockey clinics were cancelled due to the bad weather.) Special Events: 48th Annual Sand & Strand Runs: Over 400 runners surprisingly braved the wet weather for this year's races. Medals were given out to the top three finishers in each age division in both male and female categories for two race distances (2.5 -Mile and 5 -Mile). A customized commemorative T-shirt was one of the highlights, along with sponsorship of the Munchkin races by Hawthorne Savings. 1 • • Excursions: Lawrence Welk Theater Resort "Fiddler On The Roof' — An excellent show preceded by a great lunch buffet and excellent service. Bear Mountain Ski Trip — Two dozen patrons attended this trip to Bear Mountain, with 9 lifts serving 30 ski runs. Fresh snow had fallen the day before. Many requests were received for other winter snow trips. Sports Leagues & Tournaments: Men's Slo-Pitch Softball games were scheduled at the month's end — rain cancellations are expected next month. Hermosa Beach Youth Basketball continued their use of the Gymnasium seven days a week. Upcoming Events: 7 -On -7 Flag Football League Begins Over -The -Line Softball Tournament Spring Day Camp State Line Turnaround Southern California Footbag Championships Dan Crow Children's Concert Spring Kickoff Tennis Tournament Spring Eggstravaganza Roller Hockey Referee Clinic Facility April 1 April 9 April 10-14 April 15 April 15 April 18 April 21-23 April 22 April 22 2/00 User Hours 2/99User Hours Clark Building 159 188 Clark Field (Field Maint.) (Field Maint.) Theatre 107 244 Gym 297 253 Room 8 87 49 Room 10 102 94 Room 12 263 148 Valley Park Field (Field Maint.) (Field Maint.) South Park Hockey Rink 138 68 2 • DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This Month FY Last FY Month Last FY To Date To Date $37,529 $36,478 $369,475 $368,000 REVENUE FY 1999-00 for 67% of the Fiscal Year is: $369,475 or 69% of the projected figure of $534,422. DONATIONS (in addition to Department Revenue): $134,472 EXPENDITURE FY 1999-00 for 67% of the Fiscal Year is: $471,844 (estimated) or 64% of the projected figure of $742,219. Respectfully Submitted, Mitch Assumma Recreation Supervisor Concur: Mary V1Rooney Director. ommunit Resources Step City Manager 3 rrell Project Touch and the city of Hermosa- Beach .will be hosting; the 48th annual -.Sand Si Strand Run Sunday, Feb. 15. A 2.5 -mile run will begin at 8 a.m.; fo lowed by the five -mile run at 9:15 :a r Both races are`run on sand and The Strand, terrain. :� Race day= registration'. begins at 7 >a:iii -'at the base -of the -Herrnosa Beach:pie% _ The fees are: $15 for one race in advance by"Feb`. 7`and-$20'for:race day registra- tion There are separate races for children "between the'ages'of'4-and •10 for i fee of \ All runners'will receive a T-shirt Registration` forms are' available _at tIe Community' Center; 710 Pier Ave. Fora more'informatiori ca11318-0280. 'Cats' is just one of the shows to`getr} skewered in the Hermosa Beach `Play:`: house's production of 'Forbidden Broad- way,' opening this week. Call 372-447.7x=. for more information. swi.±1,/,t14.4,t,oc,:,,,oct4a (Iwo. ?.)t r arta Au.It is a tirne-konored favorite for ermosa Beach runners. by David Chrisman • . • Now in its 48th year, the annual Sand and Strand Run has left a soggy, sandy .footprint on the history of Hermosa Beach. The original version of the race r— which was called the HermOsa Beach Distance Run — was More Strand than sand as competitors made a circle around Hermosa Beach and finished at Clark Stadium on Valley Drive. In 1969;E:.1 the race was moved to the beach in order td.fdcilitate largert crowds and to keep the city from having to block off streets $ during the run. " One of the few current participants who dates back to the Clark Stadium days • is, longtime resident John, Hales„,,, who made his first start in 1967. n . • According to Hales, the earlier runs were dominated by "young hot -shots" from the greater Los Angeles:area. One,„ notable competitor was a Sioux Indian named Billy Ming who; after winning the Strand Run went .on to win the 10,000 -meter gold medal at the 1964 Olympic Games in Japan. •: Despite his legacy in Hermosa Beach, Mills' Victory in'The start of the 23rd annual Sand and Strang raFf, in ,197 Japan will be remembered as one of the great Cinderella stories of Olympic history. His record-setting finish time of who has competed in more than 30 28:24.4 was 46 seconds faster than his previous personal Str4ndraces,. the•Feret to winning the race these days is best. With about 300 competitors each year, and a course that . dptraining," said,Hales, who designed the starts at the water's edge and moves. onto The Strand and logo for this "it's a considerable shock." back to the water, the Sand and Strand run bears little re- :i::''..iAnetker,'faCf9t in the Strand run —. 45 percent of which semblance to Olympic track and field. Still, having a strat- will be run on iiard and..soft sand -- is the tide. Hales, who egy is crucial. has kept a log of his fin* times and the tides during the it' • • was a rainy affair. . last 30 years, sees a direct correlation between the two. Low tide provides a flat, hard running surface while high tides make for a sloped and mushy sand. The latter, according to Hales, makes for a sloppier run and slower finish times. Fortunately, this year's races will be run during a n medium to low tide. The 2.5 -mile version will s at (Please turn to Pa 7) • hy Robb Fulcher - park'soperating expense of $25,000 a The promoters of a prominent beach.: -r. -•s-year, most of which goes to pay for retie - Torts event have agreed to pay $10,000 to ..:-:'-:-atiOnWorkers.. sang a large advertising sign inside the. Since the opening last June of the 8,000 lerrnosa Beach Skate Park .for one year, "r:-.• square -foot concrete park at Pier Avenue is the city launches a pragranidesigned.to. . and Ardmore; IOCal privatesponsors have ay for the "park's day-to-day'operation -donated safety equipment for skaters and The : baiUferspace,- bought _ money for siiecial-events.s.s.:-- nt.rnatianal _Management Group of Los Prominent:local sponsors haveinaltia-:',..."-:". kngeles, will be used to adVertise the annu- ed the Iciwang;rilemiessey'Tavern;Fat:"-..:-... Mervyn's Beach Bash, a four-day festival Face . Fenner's :Pisliack, the "Treasure • if volleyball, ,nnisiC:and extreme aports, Chest, Hermosa iCycrlery.& Skate sShop, ‘Thichdebtiledi4 Hermosa Iast June. and 1-lepnasa!a reserve police corps.. -The banner, which is schedulcdscheduled to go 'The iiark'-$100.,000. construction co lc; soon, '1•••''YcrY:...ttractive," said Mary .•-•;lwas paid for through a fund for park tooney76-ssisi -:d1t4Y "manager and cointhm- lands and recreation items, fed in part by a'unity resources director. . _ takes on new construction and i?y4rant. Ihey"61koea the design with us ," she •,, _moneY left OVer:afteri:thecity paid -for its aict.', It has -Ccater0;:arid small print itgre00qf park -Way. aya It's very subtle. :The park's school -season hours are:3 .Ttie•6tirdita---4s..,t9 sell th#elother year- 1; weekdays, and noon to 7. )ng adveising spots at".0,900:4pop;-:-...p.n.:. Weekends; --iheliaark-srCan aiso be longlhefeifcesi1n4de the pailt:-A211,the---irented for:$66:_anianig',..byeccilling (310) dvertisiniiiats ibiether. will cover "the 318 -0280:' -'ER •••••' Sign up for Volleyball • • -0 c,ts C-(-1 Semi form: The'l-lerni.CO'BeaehSkate Pier f-afa`." a" • special j. WitliVegni:Pro , . _ Day":..StindiryaFeti. 27..147tWo.-ssiorii" beginning 9Teih:.c.kia 10 15a1in Inthe one-hour cost $20,14.4: 47t0110:),Aik,oa:::,wii. . get_ • sP(4s0444k460;7:4Ng0"-.11)Aivcr and full safety gear will btAtiked. • Aegi,Iatitf-k:#4,01iiieday, • Feb. 18- 280. T41154=itgckii.114-1-Lf-6011 season hours are m to • and noon jo---Tp_an.'weeken ...." • -. -• . • Registration for the upcoming season is • ongoing for the United States Youth Vol- leyball League's Hermosa Beach location through. March 1. The eight-week session is scheduled to begin May 1 at South Park in Hermosa Beach. The cost of the pro- gram — which includes uniform top and equipment — is $80. The USYVL is an instructional volley- ball league that operates in a coed format for boys and girls between the ages of 8 and 14. The league's mission is to provide eyerSvyghile-:skith the opportunity to play volleyball in a safe,- shpervised,:loW- Pres4tiiknvii-onent. Along -with ;teach- ing the.s.;000sppc§46, to play volleyball, the prOgratn maintains an emphasis ...on sportsnianship, cooperation and team- - work Operating as a nonprofit organization, the USYVL relies on volunteers to assist with coaching registration and other duties. For more information, call (888) 988- 7985. Y:f ' Afew.V.. 'Z.- to- (".) . ..... • • u Steppinv Out 41f,6**itaWir4k#41. • • • ••• • • : • . • . , 00(1 triSsulds'i t'io%9Et erl% • — 4t ,sti • • • .',`,•;:4•••• - The Beach Reporter • February 10, 2000 'Forbidden Broadway' leaves no stone untuine review by Kept Stodilart . • Gerard Alessandrini's musical comedy satire "Forbidden Broadway Clea:ns'up-itS, Act!" leaves; no stone unturnedforhis• hot -poker lampooning of Broad‘Yayrini.• sicals. Although he is very diplomatic in his skewering of the. American. musical institution, everyone takes a good doseof clever ridicule, from the front of the house to the back of the house. .The •de- signers, producers, writers, directors, lyri- cists, composers and, of course, the singers, dancers and stars are all victims for his comedic scorn. The Hermosa Beach Playhouse in as- sociatinn •with the Civic Light Opera of South Bay Cities is presenting Ales- sandrini's biting satire at the Hermosa Civic Theatre through Sunday. In this current production, Alessan- drini guides his four vocally talented iMi- tators, (Susanne Blakeslee, Gina Kreiez- mar, Brian Patrick Miller and Bill Selby) through breakneck choreography and amazingly quick costume changes — 33 numbers covering 16 shows are presented in 90 minutes. The show has that nasty mocking -wit that we have all tried to outgrow yet con- tinue to find uncontrollably funny. Last Sunday's packed matinee had as many audience members hissing as guffawing. Within the confines of Alessandrini's satiric vision are keen biting lyrics inter- posed over familiar Broadway tunes. Highlights included players performing. in traction because of outrageous Disney •caticature costuming.-.Fosse's "Chicago" .• •. ft • ni r" such lurid .choreograpiTtliq : • •••,, ,6143.74•44!:i!IAT'. "YM•?: .• inhumOrou5.skewerin NC -17 rating treby;,Nnnn'slaL4 Miserables" not only`featuresnhis players despreSSed,,:linf'alsciaiiii&atedffrOlf41thegat rotating stage. These witty bits are funny, stinging and in good taste. However, Alessandrini's show' often walks that very thin line of gqpicl,ca# where one can, for the sake of humor;',4 pear unconsciously cruel rathersthan clever. This happens on only a couple of • occasions, particula4.during,the,irnita7. tion of certain Broadway Con- cerning the proper rules, of ,sati,r, the• most vicious of 18tlifdeniuiy:satiriSt Jonathan Swift, wrote: "Malice should • never be the aim, lash the vice, but spare the name." This should he, the rifle:9f thumb when it comes to any icindOf. satire. • However, some of ole memo- rable parts of the show depicted' some amazing parroting of..Br9a4way.t4r, where the performers 'tiptheir hat with adulation as well as make fun: Blafc'eS]- lee's Barbara Streisand and Bill SelbSe.s Michael Crawford are both humorousand exact. Brad Ellis' musical directiqn;keeps,a very quick pace, blending familiar tunes in varying keys. Phillip George:helps Alessandrini with the choreography, and the Fosse and Nunn stagings are hysteri- cal. Alvin Colt's costumes.and Stephen Laliberte's wigs could do a twO-,liour comedic satire by themselves. The most evident drawbac100 sandrini's show is that to fully apmCiate his satire one must be a savvy‘and consis- frat-t ttle•nte... .,.,,,i Theohnly fitnny ig-time theater rtilo,Broadway'shoW' is safe from Gerard • , upits.Acti' The chotic9PYri!"f11"rciug4 S • is, Alessandrini's 'Forbidden Broadway Cleans4110 unday at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse. . • to entertain. "Forbidden Broadway Cleans up its • Act!" continues until Sunday, Feb. 13, at the Hermosa Beach Playhouse. Tickets •are $35. For information and reserva- tions, call 372-4477. eV:en4f you have nofseen, the butt of Alessandrini's burlesque; yet twice as. • funnYif youhave. Theslinwinses a little. • of .its intimacy in the Hermosa Beach Playhouse, where a previous staging in Hollywood at the Tiffany Theatre had more of that wink, nod and nudge inside - joke feel. However, the show is still sure Reviews .of .roadeolw at the Herm sa Mayhouse, .. at the Palos Verdes Players, and o►zw'at the Taper - Forbidden Broadway by Kari Sayers - It's no longer necessary to travel the free- :ways to see superb live theater. Right here in .• our • midst -sits " the 'Hermosa Playhouse, where, through Sunday, February 13, four actors accompanied by •a piano player will not only keep you in stitches but also leave' you in awe of their,incredible versatility and their 'amazing ability to impersonate almost • The show is the latest version of Forbidden ""Broadway,, a"musical spoof_ of Broadway's megamusicals :and •many- of their stars. Written 'by .Gerard • Alessandrini; -who also - created •;Forbidden Hollywood, "seen • at the Hermosa Playhouse exactly one year ago; it's a. laugh -out -loud musical revue.that thumbs its nose at such.diverse shows as Cats,.Shoiv Boat, .and The Sound of Music. And although :you may miss" a few of the inside jokes, -you do not have to be a die-hard Broadway musi- • :cal aficionado. to ;"get it.'.Most of the lam- - :podned shows •are ;:universally: known. • In :fact;. different• versions of the musical .satire have" beenperforrned or.appreciative nodi ences around the: world.... _ _= `. -The show moves along at breakneck.. speed =with'the four actors�:ichanging�"wigs: and -costumes in . a matter of nanoseconds The •magnificent` costumes,:•:designed AlvinColt,'are uinovative, dazzling and hilar- __ ious ` Wig designby Stephen; I.a Liberte, - =while Brad Elhs'provides great musical direr . tionin addition'to'hrspiand acconipiiniinenf:`' • . - Forbidden Broadway =is one': those shows'_ vthat rail be enjoyed again and again; for the ?musical numbers keep cl angiging and the mate - ,nal is constantly being updated "In this�partic nothing tacrecLUoi odd roadway `' _ t• ;i . _rPhot• o'7ry,,l of• K and • several cities across the United States). Producer-_ Caipbron Mackintosh in Napoleon hat is being roasted as the`emperor . { of Broadway The audience •iil1 easily recognize the 30 -year-old - Annie, ._-who = hasn't :worked since : she was ten .and .for whom tomorrow is•; yesterday. Thetwo • female actors ,Susanne';Blakeslee and. Gina';Kieieimar (whom .. '• .weaw here in Forbidden .Hollywood) `....as Chita Rivera and Rita Moreno have it -"out. with ":each other while singing `I'm :Rita "and not Chita' ,and vice versa to the tune. of - Am 'erica` from .West Fieldurg inAugust Stde Story The '•impersonation of Carol Channing in Hello Dolly is hilarious, as is the parody of Barbara Streisand. At' last ,Friday's opening perfor mance, my favorite was the portrayal of Liza Minnelli in sequined, fire -engine red pants and matching top, waving her long legs; fluffing her. short black mane: with thefingers of her right hand, and loving just about everybody in sight. : Les Miserables receives a thorough workout . from the actors who lament that misery and suffering are in stele, and they are furthermore grief-stricken when the show goes on -and on and on. Props such as the constantly rotating sets in Les Miserables, the whirring .heli copter in Miss Saigon and the chandelier,in-. Phantom of the Opera provide some,^good. laughs too. And some of the accents are truly impressive such as the French accent in `Oh, la, la, la, Les Miserables` sung to the tun e of `C'est Magnifique.` The program notes do not specify which actors play which parts, and it's hard to idea but it doesn't matter. tify them because the show moves so fast,:: They're all terrific. Forbidden Broadway will • play Tuesday through Saturday at 8 p.m. and. Sunday at 2, j p.m. through February 13. The Hermosa: Playhouse is located on the corner of Pier Avenue and PCH in Hermosa Beach. Call 131o) - Russell Hornsby as.Youngblood and Anthony Chuholm hs WIson's Jitney. Photo by Craig Schwartz. *ular version; Alessandrini has added a satire on Matthew.Bourne's•Swan Lake, the one that fea- tures bare -chested males as gay swans in white. fluffy feather pantaloons. Tchaikovsky "would think these boys are swell, as the two Male actors, Brian Miller and Bill Selby, sing. And what's next? Alesbian Gizelle? Martin Guerre,_ which we. haven't seen out here yet, is also mentioned. (It opens at the Ahmanson later this month after playing in London and the The city` of Hermosa Beach i sponsor- ing volleyball classes for young people and adults beginning Feb.: 26, . Classes for young "peop'le"(ages 8 through 12) will begin Sunday, Feb.: 26, from 10:45 to 11:45 a.m..The :cost =of :the -: six-week class is $32 with a$3:discount for Hermosa residents. Adult classes will also begin: Feb. 26 from 10:15 to 11:45 a.m. The"cost of the . six-week class is $38 with a $3'discount for Hermosa residents. All classes will meet on the south side of the Hermosa Beach pier: Students may sign up for the classes at the Hermosa Beach Community Center at 710 Pier Ave. For more information, call Steve Fillman at 540-3615. HERMARA BEACH FIRE DEPI4ATMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR. CALENDAR YEAR 2000 FEBRUARY THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION ORIGINAL INSPECTION COMMERCIAL ASSEMBLY 54 60 137 75 0 0 1 0 INSTITUTIONS INDUSTRIAL 0 1 1 6 0 6 APARTMENTS 10 19 32 1 0 38 RE -INSPECTION COMMERCIAL ASSEMBLY 7 8 26 19 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTIONS INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 APARTMENTS 8 20 17 1 0 32 OCCUPANCY LOAD CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMBULANCE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 FEBRUARY INVOICE BILLING FOR AMBULANCE SERVICE RESIDENTS THIS MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CURRENT MONTH BILLINGS F/Y TO DATE 21 164 $5,187. $38,274. NON-RESIDENTS TOTALS 8 152 $3,944. 29 316 $9,131. $69,056. $107,330. Respectfully Submitted: RUSSELL TINGLEY, F Noted: , CITY MANAGER fHERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 03/04/2000 Description All Fires Structure Fires Wildland Fires Medical Emergencies (with patients) Hazardous Materials Other (includes mutual aid) INCIDENT RECAP Dates: 02/01/2000 to 02/29/2000, Incidents: All Number Average Loss Value Response 100 3.67 5 3.80 2,575 2 4.00 1,350 2 4.00 225 54 3.09 1 2.00 40 4.60 NOTES: 1. Since incidents can be coded with multiple situations found, an incident may be counted more than once. 2. Average response time calculations exclude cancelled calls. KERMOSA4BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 03/04/2000 INCIDENT RECAP Dates: 01/01/2000 to 02/29/2000, Incidents: All Description Number Average Response All 202 3.47 Fires 8 3.50 3,895 Structure Fires 3 3.67 2,350, Wildland Fires 2 4.00 225 Medical Emergencies (with patients) 121 3.02 Hazardous Materials 1 2.00 Other (includes mutual aid) 72 4.32 Loss Value NOTES: 1. Since incidents can be coded with multiple situations found, an incident may be counted more than once. 2. Average response time calculations exclude cancelled calls. HERMOSAJBEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 03/04/2000 • RECAP OF PRIMARY SITUATION FOUND All Incidents Dates: 02/01/2000 to 02/29/2000, Incidents: All Code Number • Percent Description 1 11 7 7.00 STRUCTURE FIRE 15 2 2.00 FIRE IN TREES, BRUSH, GRASS, STANDING CROPS 19 1 1.00 FIRE NOT CLASSIFIED 10 10.00 2 25 ) 2 2.00 EXCESSIVE HEAT, OVERHEAT SCORCH BURNS, NO IGNITION 2 2.00 3 32 53 53.00 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CALL 33 1 1.00 LOCK -IN 54 54.00 4 41 1 1.00 FLAMMABLE GAS OR LIQUID CONDITION 49 1 1.00 HAZARDOUS CONDITION NOT CLASSIFIED 2 2.00 5 50 1 1.00 SERVICE CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 52 4 4.00 WATER PROBLEM 53 1 1.00 SMOKE, ODOR PROBLEM 55 1 1.00 PUBLIC SERVICE ASSISTANCE 57 1 1.00 COVER ASSIGNMENT, STANDBY AT FIRE STATION, MOVE -UP 59 1 1.00 SERVICE CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 9 9.00 6 60 2 2.00 GOOD INTENT CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 61 5 5.00 INCIDENT CLEARED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 62 1 1.00 WRONG LOCATION 66 1 1.00 EMS CALL, TRANSPORTED/LEFT SCENE PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 69 2 2.00 GOOD INTENT CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 11 11.00 7 70 71 73 74 79 1 1.00 FALSE CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 1 1.00 MALICIOUS, MISCHIEVOUS FALSE CALL 8 8.00 SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 1 1.00 UNINTENTIONAL 1 1.00 FALSE CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 12 12.00 100 100.00 TIERMOSA'BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 03/04/2000 RECAP OF PRIMARY SITUATION FOUND All Incidents Dates: 01/01/2000 to 02/29/2000, Incidents: ALL Code Number Percent Description 1 11 9 4.46 STRUCTURE FIRE 15 2 0.99 FIRE IN TREES, BRUSH, GRASS, STANDING CROPS 16 1 0.50 REFUSE FIRE OUTSIDE 19 2 0.99 FIRE NOT CLASSIFIED 14 6.94 2 25 4 1.98 EXCESSIVE HEAT, OVERHEAT SCORCH BURNS, NO IGNITION 4 1.98 3 32 121 59.90 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CALL 33 1 0.50 LOCK -IN 122 60.40 4 41 1 0.50 FLAMMABLE GAS OR LIQUID CONDITION 44 6 2.97 ELECTRICAL ARCING, SHORTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 49 1 0.50 HAZARDOUS CONDITION NOT CLASSIFIED 8 3.97 5 50 2 0.99 SERVICE CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 51 1 0.50 PERSON IN DISTRESS 52 7 3.47 WATER PROBLEM 53 3 1.49 SMOKE, ODOR PROBLEM 55 2 0.99 PUBLIC SERVICE ASSISTANCE 57 1 0.50 COVER ASSIGNMENT, STANDBY AT FIRE STATION, MOVE -UP 59 1 0.50 SERVICE CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 17 8.44 6 60 2 0.99 GOOD INTENT CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 61 6 2.97 INCIDENT CLEARED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 62 1 0.50 WRONG LOCATION 64 1 0.50 VICINITY ALARM 66 1 0.50 EMS CALL, TRANSPORTED/LEFT SCENE PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 69 2 0.99 GOOD INTENT CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 13 6.45 7 70 2 0.99 FALSE CALL UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 71 1 0.50 MALICIOUS, MISCHIEVOUS FALSE CALL 73 16 7.92 SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 74 3 1.49 UNINTENTIONAL 79 2 0.99 FALSE CALL NOT CLASSIFIED 24 11.89 202 100.07 AERMOSA'BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 03/04/2000 • DAY OF WEEK/DISPATCH TIME RECAP All Incidents Dates: 02/01/2000 to 02/29/2000, Incidents: All Time Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0000 1 1 1 1 4 0100 1 1 1 2 5 0200 1 1 2 4 0300 1 1 0400 2 2 0600 1 1 1 3 0700 1 1 2 0800 2 2 4 0900 1 3 2 6 1000 1 2 2 1 6 1100 4 2 1 7 1200 2 1 2 1 1 7 1300 1 1 2 1400 1 1 1 1 4 1500 1 1 3 1 6 1600 1 2 1 4 1700 1 1 1 1 1 5 1800 2 1 1 1 5 1900 3 1 3 7 2000 1 1 1 1 4 2100 !1 1 1 1 2 6 2300 2 2 2 6 16 15 11 15 19 12 12 100 NERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 1 03/04/2000 DAY OF WEEK/DISPATCH TIME RECAP All Incidents Dates: 01/01/2000 to 02/29/2000, Incidents: All Time Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0000 2 2 1 3 8 0100 2 2 1 2 2 9 0200 2 1 1 1 2 3 10 0300 1 • 1 1 3 0400 2 1 1 4 0500 1 2 1 1 5. 0600 1 1 2 1 5 0700 4 1 1 6 • 0800 3 3 3 3 12 0900 1 2 5 2 1 . 11 1000 2 2 2 2 8 1100 2 5 1 1 1 2 4 16 1200 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 13 1300 2 1 1 4 1400 1 1 1 1 4 1500 2 2 4 1 2 1 12 1600 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 12 1700 2 1 1 1 2 1 8 1800 3 3 1 2 1 10 1900 1, 4 ' 1 6 12- 2000 2 1 3 1 7 2100 4 3 2 1 1 2 13 2200 2 2 2300 2 2 2 1 1 8 32 26 30 25 28 24 37 202 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Sebruary 8, 2000 Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT — FEBRUARY 2000 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; this includes engineering and management of Capital Improvements Projects. PLAN CHECKS STAFF HOURS PERMITS CURRENT PREVIOUS YEAR TO MONTH DATE STREET PARCEL SEWER SEWER STREET BANNERS DUMPSTER/ UTIL. BUILDING ENCR./C.U.P. PLANS MAP LATERAL DEMO. EXCAV. MISC. CO. DEPT. ETC. 14 CUTS CURRENT 12 25 7 5 14 2 4 16 46 4 MONTH Meetings - Other Public Agencies 10 3 80.5 TOTAL HOURS 180 213 1972 YEAR TO 41 29 41 78 30 45 95 26 DATE NON-CIP PROJECTS STAFF HOURS DESCRIPTION CURRENT PREVIOUS YEAR TO MONTH DATE Inspections 53 81 468.0 NPDES Permit/City Storm Water Management Program 20 14 107.0 General Office Engineering 31 25 444.5 Grant Applications 20 35 192.0 Projects 46 55 680.0 Meetings - Other Public Agencies 10 3 80.5 TOTAL HOURS 180 213 1972 ENGINEERING •The Capital Improvement Projects currently in progress or completed are: COMPLETED PROJECT NO. 97-141 99-143 97-526 96-624 96-508 TITLE Street Slurry Monterey Blvd. Improvement (19th St. to Hermosa) Community Center Tennis Courts North Pier Parking Structure Greenbelt Improvements — Curb and Gutter TOTAL COMPLETED COST 80,607 212,000 441,950 5,300,200 11,250 6,046,007 1 UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. TITLE 97-182 Myrtle Ave. Undergrounding 97-183 Loma Dr. Undergrounding 95-153 Traffic Signal Hermosa & 14th Street 95-156 Traffic Signal Hermosa & 13th Street 98-621 Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrade, Phase II 99-529 Clark Field Improvements TOTAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION EST. COST 1,315,660 1,307,457 115,304 115,304 1,314,870 50,000 4,218,595 OUT TO BID PROJECT NO. TITLE EST. COST TOTAL OUT TO BID UNDER DESIGN PROJECT NO. 95-150 98-304 99-144 95-507 96-622 00-630 99-305 TITLE Hermosa -Pier to 16th Street 16th Street Storm Drain Improvements Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path, 24th Street to 35th Street Valley Park Improvements City Hall ADA Requirements Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrade, Phase III Installation of CDS Units TOTAL UNDER DESIGN EST. COST 20,090 1,287,800 53,000 359,894 726,800 1,228,684 424,129 4,100,397 TO BE DESIGNED PROJECT NO. 99-158 99-409 99-530 99-610 99-623 99-627 99-306 TITLE Developers Reimb./14th St., etc. Manhole Repair/Reconstruction Various Park Improvements Fire Station Upstairs Remodel & Additions 99-00 CDBG Allocation Community Center Improvements Catch Basin Inserts TOTAL TO BE DESIGNED EST. COST 165,000 135,000 270,264 300,000 141,459 270,264 64,687 1,346,674 • MAINTENANCE • The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: • Parks/Medians • Street Maintenance/Building Maintenance • Sewers/Storm Drains • Street Lighting • Traffic Safety • Equipment Service Parks/Medians Division: Clark Field prep; installation of new drinking fountains, dugout furniture; field ball diamond prep; storm damage repairs; ongoing median maintenance; assisted in street light projects; chain saw training. Street Maintenance Division: Clark Field prep; OSHA training; repaired sewer line at 4th Court; started prep for Lot B parking project. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Clark Field Prep for Little League; on-going sewer maintenance; storm damage repairs and cleanup; pumped flooded areas; removed fallen trees. Street Lighting Division: Installation of Myers can at Bay View; Building electrical repairs banners up/down; street light repairs, lower Pier Avenue lighting repairs; Clark Field prep. Traffic Safety Division: Set up new posted area for 7th Street sweeping; assisted at Clark Field; assisted in sewer project at 4th Court, 1st Place t & l's painting; installed handicapped parking; repaired stop signs, storm damage repairs. Building Maintenance: Repaired restrooms at Community Center and Community Services buildings; prepped Clark Field; marquee; roof repairs at Community Center. Equipment Service Division: Ongoing vehicle maintenance. Graffiti Removal: FY 98-99 JULY 1998 AUGUST 1998 SEPTEMBER 1998 OCTOBER 1998 NOVEMBER 1998 DECEMBER 1998 JANUARY 1999 FEBRUARY 1999 MARCH 1999 APRIL 1999 MAY 1999 JUNE 1999 YTD TOTAL: 46.00 Hours 53.50 Hours 47.50 Hours 14.50 Hours 0.00 Hours 49.00 Hours 25.50 Hours 9.50 Hours 45.50 Hours 5.00 Hours 33.00 Hours 53.00 Hours 382.00 Hours FY 99-00 JULY 1999 AUGUST 1999 SEPTEMBER 1999 OCTOBER 1999 NOVEMBER 1999 " DECEMBER 1999 JANUARY 2000 FEBRUARY 2000 MARCH 2000 APRIL 2000 MAY 2000 JUNE 2000 54.5 Hours 21.5 Hours 18.0 Hours 36.5 Hours 16.0 Hours 23.5 Hours 8.0 Hours 22.5 Hours YTD TOTAL: 200.5 Hours Respectfully submitted: Rhea B. Punneo Administrative Assistant Noted: Stephen R. B City Manager Concur: -I rold C. Williams, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer F/B95/PWFILES/Monthly Act Report 2000 February Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, FEBRUARY 2000 March 22, 2000 City Council Meeting of March 23, 2000 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration t A ................ ................ • :n.�www'r..;;T.�;R>?•^•.•`.-'.'Si::i::'.• y.•'•:•'.•�::'.^.::::•:•�,.:�:;. �y�. Full Time Employees fie€::EsqC0.-" a 132 1 134 f /b95/open/finactivityTOT_doc Finance Cashier • California Out of State 1,232 182 1,301 188 8,661 17,109 2,315 Driveway Guest Party Passes Contractor Daily 116 10 DT Employee Transferable 21 15 2,337 197 16 0 54 1,724 1,824 Licenses Issued 213 247 1,714 1,691 NOTED: Ste City Manager urr- II, Respectfully submitted: Viki Copeland, Finance Director 11%95\open/SnactivityNOV99.doc DEFITMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND 1i1LROL_ REPORT OF ACTIVITIES. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2000 AMOUNT OF SERVICE YEAR TO LAST YEAR SERVICE PROVIDED THIS MONTH DATE • TO DATE SERVICE REQUEST 1 2 FIELD HOURS* 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 - DOG ]IMPOUNDED 1 24 26 CAT IMPOUNDED 0 7 12 OTHER IMPOUNDED 0 3 8 • CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 PRIVATE VETERINARIAN CARE 0 0 0 OBSERVATION 0 1 0 DEAD ANIMAL 0 0 0 • HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 - • 0 COURT APPEARANCES (hours) 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 ANIMALS PLACED IN NEW HOMES 1 7 8 ANIMALS RETURNED TO OWNERS 0 7 10 LICENSED SOLD 0 0 0 DOG LICENSE CANVASSING 0000:00 00000:00 - 00000:00 *Includes humane education hours • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT February 2000 March 15, 2000 Regular Meeting of March 28, 2000 STATISTICS Workers Comp Claims CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE Claims opened 0 4 2 28 Claims closed 2 2 17 28 Total open 51 47 Current Employee 26 23 Lost time (hours) Safety Fire -0- 156 160 1082 3983 Police 156 Non -Safety 170 151 1392 480 Liability Claims Claims opened Claims closed Total open Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents 1 0 17 13 2 4 32 15 19 19 Safety 0 0 Non -safety 0 0 Employee Turnover Safety Non -Safety 1 0 3 0 5 1 1 0 1 3 Respectfully submitted, Noted: Mi ael A. Earl, Directs r Stephen R. Burrell P rsonnel & Risk Management City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION FEBRUARY, 2000 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT CURRENT MONTH THIS'MONTH AA$717:!!--fygjKi LAST FY TO DATE `. BUILDING 37 50 342 457 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 41 48 315 359 ELECTRIC 17 35 202. 224 PLAN CHECK 21 28 145 195 SEWER USE 4 3 21 22 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 28 42 226 245 PARKS & RECREATION 1 0 2 11 IN LIEU PARKING & REC 5 4 29 22 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 1 SIGN REVIEW 1 1 14 22 FIRE FLOW FEES 8 15 68 91 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 1 0 9 6 TOTALS 164 226 1,373 1,655 PERMITFEES CURRENT MONTH THIS ,MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST..FY TO DATE. BUILDING $31,328.90 $29,188.47 $225,668.54 $247,523.71 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 2,735 5,505 31,609.75 32,100 ELECTRIC 2,857 5,641 41,803 37,085 PLAN CHECK 28, 632.60 21,472.80 146,102.20 200,549.20 SEWER USE 2,706.77 4,601.47 44, 307.77 22,254 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 1,288 1,890 10,322 11,025 PARKS & RECREATION 3,500 0 7,000 38,500 IN LIEU PARKING & REC. 22,386 13,792 116,816 72, 593.53 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 170 SIGN REVIEW 93 91 1,300 1,980 FIRE FLOW FEES 11, 539.50 9,947.50 84, 560.50 91, 335.03 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 35 0 313 199 TOTALS $107,101.77 $92,129.24 1 $709,802.76 $755,314.47 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2000 DWELLING ..._...._....................................... __..._......_.................._............... ....._ .._............._._..._............. ..........._........_................. UNITS 1 101 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES DETACHED 9 9 $2,037,257.56 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES ATTACHED 2 5 1,045,955.52 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDINGS 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDINGS 6 213 NEW HOTELS/MOTELS 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCHS/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGES. 12 322 NEW SERVICE STATIONS/REPAIR GARAGES 13 323 NEW HOSPITALS/OTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICES/BANKS 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BUILDINGS 16 326 NEW SCHOOLS/OTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORES/OTHER MERCH BLDGS. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDING 3 30,000 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOLS 19 93,770 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 22 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION -SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 4 4 2,000 24 646 DEMO 2 -FAMILY BUILDINGS 25 647 DEMO 3-4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 26 648 DEMO 5+ FAMILY BUILDINGS 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BUILDINGS 2 1,000 TOTAL PERMITS: 39 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: $3,209,983.08 TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY TO DATE: 59 TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED FY TO DATE: 71 (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: -12 FY 1997-98 Total New Dwelling Units: 99 Total Demolished Units: 72 Net Units: 27 2 FY 1998-99 Total New Dwelling Units: 92 Total Demolished Units: 53 Net Units: 39 Dwelling Units Demolished as of February, 2000 ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT. DATE : PERMIT No. No. OF UNIT . ;I 143 Manhattan Avenue SFR 7/8/99 B99-275 1 731 4th Street SFR 7/13/99 B99-311 1 644 & 646 Monterey Blvd. Duplex 7/15/99 B99-317 2 601 Manhattan Avenue SFR 7/20/99 B99-320 1 1656 Manhattan Avenue Duplex 7/22/99 B99-326 2 1507 Manhattan/1506 Palm 2 Houses 7/27/99 B99-328 2 1046-50 Monterey Blvd. Dupex 8/2/99 B99-350 2 1041 Sunset DriveSFR 8/2/99 B99-351 1 1052-54 Monterey Blvd. Duplex 8/2/99 B99-352 2 1053-57 Sunset Drive Triplex 8/2/99 B99-353 3 122 Hermosa Avenue SFR 8/11/99 B99-378 1 1217 Cypress Avenue SFR 8/16/99 B99-312 1 2912 Palm Drive SFR 8/17/99 B99-372 1 153 Manhattan Avenue SFR 9/9/99 B99-437 1 322-24-26 Ocean View Dr. Triplex 9/9/99 B99-440 3 634-636 Longfellow Ave. Apartment 9/14/99 B99-445 2 700 & 702 11th Street Duplex 9/14/99 B99-446 2 720 11th Street SFR 9/14/99 B99-447 1 1510 Golden Avenue SFR 9/20/99 B99-454 1 1065 7th Street SFR 10/18/99 B99-498 1 2650 Hermosa Avenue SFR 11/1/99 B99-512 1 615 2nd Street SFR 11/3/99 B99-518 1 619 2nd Street Duplex 11/3/99 B99-519 2 1419 Monterey Blvd. SFR 11/9/99 B99-524 1 2902 Ingleside Dr. Duplex 11/17/99 B99-531 2 2916 Ingleside Dr. SFR 11/17/99 B99-532 1 454 28th Street SFR 12/1/99 B99-547 1 633 3rd Street SFR 12/13/99 B99-566 1 636 4th Street SFR 12/13/99 B99-567 1 638 4th Street SFR 12/13/99 B99-568 1 650 4th Street SFR 12/13/99 B99-569 1 654 4th Street SFR 12/13/99 B99-570 1 53 15th Street Apartment 12/23/99 B99-589 9 520 24th Place SFR 1/6/00 B00-5 1 332 31st Street SFR 1/10/00 B00-6 1 830 15th Street SFR 1/18/00 B00-11 1 902 Manhattan Avenue Apartments 1/20/00 B00-12 4 904 Manhattan Avenue Apartments 1/20/00 B00-13 4 2425 Silverstrand Avenue Duplex 1/27/00 B00-24 2 720 The Strand SFR 2/2/00 B00-32 1 702 10th Street SFR 2/10/00 800-45 1 41 16th Street SFR 2/10/00 B00-47 1 2311 Park Avenue SFR 2/29/00 B00-76 1 Total Units Demolished 71 • March 6, 2000 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL March 21, 2000 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION FEBRUARY, 2000 STAFF REPORT PREPARED UB;IEC'. THIS MONTH; THIS MONTH`; LAST FY 'D. O DATE; .: APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 0 0 5 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - CONDOMINIUMS 3 2 16 22 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - COMMERCIAL 0 0 1 1 C.U.P./PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 2 2 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 1 5 11 12 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1 0 4 2 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1 0 2 2 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 1 1 6 7 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 1 5 8 PARKING PLAN 0 0 3 2 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 0 0 SUBDIVISION 0 0 0 0 TEXT AMENDMENT 3 0 11 5 TRANSIT 1 0 2 1 VARIANCE 1 0 5 4 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 0 2 MISCELLANEOUS 5 6 46 36 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 18 17 120 117 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP PASSENGERS, THUS MONTH THis;MONTH LAST FY FY TO OATS LAST FY To, DATE .. HERMOSA BEACH 465 558 5,340 6,060 REDONDO BEACH 3,991 3,631 40,295 38,982 SATELLITE 352 499 2,811 3,773 4 CONCUR: eats , Sol Blumenfeld,pirector Community Dev opment Department NOTED: Stephen R City Manager f:\b95\cd\activity Respectfully submitted, Yu-Ying Ting Administrative Assistant 4, ilmmosa Beach Police Department • Monthly Activity Report for Calendar Year 2000 February, 2000 FEBRUARY FEBRUARY YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE 2000 1999 2000 1999 • OFFENSES REPORTED MURDER 0 0 0 .., 0 RAPE 0 0 0 0 ROBBERY 0 1 2 5 ASSAULT 8 5 16 14 Burglaries(Vehicle) 5 6 7 15 Burglaries(Residential) 4 1 10 5 Burglaries(Commercial). 2 1 2 2 BURGLARY(Total) 11 8 19 22 LARCENY 24 30 61 62 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 4 5 6 13 DUI 6 19 16 49 ALL OTHER OFFENSES 72 98 158 174 PERSONS ARRESTED ADULTS 32 66 78 127 JUVENILES 0 1 1 1 CRIMINAL CITATIONS 24 46 41 112 BICYCLEJSKATEBOARD CITES 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTS Fatal 0 0 0 0 Injury 7 8 15 11 Property Damage Only 7 10 25 20 CITATIONS Traffic 218 263 470 603 Parking 0 0 0 0 DISTURBANCE CALLS 476 199 224 421 *comparison range invalid due to modified procedure to caputure POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE data in the new RMS computer 1,517 1,466 3,245 3,306 system. Revised and changed 3 -Mar -98 Page 1 -0 0 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Monthly Activity Report for the Calendar Year 2000 FEBRUARY, 2000 FEBRUARY FEBRUARY YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE 2000 1999 2000 1999 . PARKING ENFORCEMENT •-, PARKING CITATIONS ISSUED 3,057 3,876 6,642 8,527 BOOTS ' 2 2 6 7 VEHICLE IMPOUNDS 41 18 66 43 CALLS FOR SERVICE 132 120 282 235. ANIMAL CONTROL CITATIONS ISSUED 2 11 6 20 CALLS FOR SERVICE 45 47 97 84 ANIMAL PICK UPS 17 13 35 30 • OF THESE RETURNED TO OWNER 4 6 11 17 TAKEN TO SHELTER 2 1 3 3 INJURED, TAKEN TO VET 1 1 3 2 DECEASED 10 5 . 17 16 RETURNED TO WILD 0 0 1 0 ADOPTED 0 0 0 0- Respecfully Submitted to: City Manager - Steve Burrell By: (/5z11 ,./7-51, get Chief of Police - Val Straser Prepared by: . Records Manager - Ruth Miller , Content approved by: Division Commander Lt. Mark Wright Page 2