Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/14/84Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council February 14, 1984 MEN'S OPEN SUMMER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT SPONSORSHIP CONTRACT Recommendation It is recommended that Your Honorable Body approve the attached contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and Event Concepts for joint sponsorship of.the Men's Open Volleyball Tournament, July 21 and 22, 1984, as recommended by Staff and the Community Resources Commission. Background Event Concepts sponsored this Tournament last year, July, 1983. At that time, the City received total revenue of $2,792.50. Expenses for.the tournament were $1,340.10. The net gain from that tournament was $1,452.40. Analysis The tournament of 1983 was very successful. However, one area of possible potential trouble is the blatant violation of drink- ing on the beach. As we are aware, the drinking will never stop even if another sponsor is found. However, staff feels it can be controlled and monitored more.closely.. Measures have been taken to mitigate this problem as much as possible. Event Concepts will have a security force of no less than eight people at any one time for crowd control and to quietly inform individuals of the open container ordinance. This is done at the Cuervo Tournament in Redondo'Beach and has worked out very well. As a follow up to last year's tournament, staff solicited evalu- ations from elected officials, Department Heads, and various merchants in the City. The overwhelming response was approval -2- of the tournament. The few negative remarks were the concern for the blatant abuse of drinking on the beach. And as indicated above, we believe we have taken steps to mitigate that for next year's tournament. Also, the Department was approached by a new volleyball organization called The Association of Volleyball Professionals, to sponsor this same tournament. Negotiations with the AVP fell through when that organization withdrew it's proposal in early January. No reason was given for their withdrawal. Respectfully Submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Concur: G egory T. Meyer City Manager I " J AC,RFRMF.NT This agreement is entered into on February 14, 1984, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between EVENT CONCEPTS, INC., a California corporation (EC) and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the following facts: a) EC is a sales promotion company which annually promotes professional beach volleyball tournaments comprising the Pro Beach Volleyball Tour. b) CITY administers beaches in Hermosa Beach, California, and annually stages beach volleyball tournaments, in- cluding the Hermosa Beach Open. c) EC and CITY are desirous of entering a relationship with regard to the 1984 Hermosa Beach Open. Therefore it is agreed as follows: 1) Event Concepts will, upon gaining sponsorship support from a major beer company, pay to the CITY a fee of $1,750 for use of the Pier Avenue volleyball courts July 21-22, 1984. 2) Event Concepts will provide up to four portable toilets; at same location as previous year. 3) Event Concepts will pay costs for a maximum of four hours supplemental trasli pick-up, Saturday and Sunday nights, July 21 and 22. 4. Event Concepts will guarantee a minimum prize purse of $10,000. In no event is the CITY liable for the prize money. 5) Event Concepts will guarantee a minimum advertising support expenditure of $10,000. 6) Event Concepts will produce a minimum of 2,000 posters in support of the event and a minimum of 5,000 special Hermosa Beach Open issues of BEACH VOLLEYBALL MAGAZINE. Event Concepts is responsible for distribution. 7) Event Concepts will include the Hermosa Beach Open in all Tour -wide schedules, posters, ads in the National Outdoor,Volleyball Association schedule ar ity listings of the Tour. 8) Event Concepts will provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, its officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage. 9) Event Concepts will provide a tournament scoreboard, volleyballs, trophies and fees for referees, at no cost to the CITY. Event Concepts has the option to use the CITY'S scoreboard. 10) EC will pay the cost for Police officers to supervise the event both days; the chief of police will mandate the num- ber of officers and hours worked. In the event of an'emer- gency or other situation arising which necessitates addi- tional security, Event Concepts is responsible for the additional costs incurred. 11) Event Concepts will supply a security force of their own, minimum of eight at any one time to supervise the crowd and alert all present to the "Open Container" Ordinance of the City. All such personnel shall be wearing identifiable T-shirts. 12) Event Concepts will be permitted to sell custom Hermosa Beach Open volleyball T-shirts at the beach subject to prior approval of the graphics by the CITY of HERMOSA BEACH. 13) Event Concepts will have the first right of refusal to sponsor the event in the years 1985 and 1986, with a new agreement signed no later that December of each year. Each party shall review the success of the event following its conclusion, and either party may terminate continua- tion or renewal of this agreement by submitting written notification of termination to the other party prior to August 31, 1984. 14) Event Concepts will collect entry fees from players which projects to approximately 40 teams at $10 apiece, or a total of $400. Event Concepts shall pay all entry fees to CITY. 15) The CITY will permit the attachment of the.sponsor's name to the official event title and shall permit use of spon- sorship signage, product replicas and other props to iden- tify tournament sponsors on the beach. 16) The CITY shall be notified no'later than May 15, 1984, of any co-sponsors supporting the Tournament. Each co-sponsor shall pay to CITY a fee of $100. 17) CITY shall provide a tournament director and eight volley- ball courts with nets, suitable for tournament competition. x. .. .. ..�,x.r... Al 18) CITY shall permit Event Concepts to place two event banners announcing the tournament, at mutually agreed locations, for the period of two weeks preceding the event. 19) CITY shall permit the staging of a regional bathing.beauty competition for one hour, beginning at 1:OO p.m., July 21, in conjunction with the volleyball tournament. Procedures and guidelines for staging the bathing beauty competition will be submitted to CITY's Community Resources Department for approval. Said competition shall take place at the south side of the Pier and shall not impede lifeguarding activities. 20) CITY shall request the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches to level the beach before 7:00 a.m. on July 21 and July 22. 21) CITY shall make its best effort to arrange parking facilities around Hermosa Beach and arrange shuttle bus service to the tournament, at no cost°to EC. EC shall include parking and shuttle information in pre -event advertising and publicity. EC shall also produce directional signs for the event for posting at locations. specified by the CITY. ACCEPTED FOR: THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH bydate the Honorable Gary Brutsch, Mayor EVENT CONCEPTS, INC. by date David A. Wilk, Vice President February 7, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of February 14, 1984 MEN'S OPEN SUMMER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT SPONSORSHIP CONTRACT Recommendation It is recommended that Your Honorable Body approve the attached contract between the -City of Hermosa Beach and Event Concepts for joint sponsorship of the Men's Open Volleyball Tournament, July 21 and 22, 1984, as recommended by Staff and the Community Resources Commission. Background Event Concepts sponsored this Tournament last year, July, 1983. At that time, the City received total revenue of $2,792.50. Expenses for the tournament were $1,340.10. The net gain from that tournament was $1,452.40. Analysis The tournament of 1983 was very successful. However, one area of possible potential trouble is the blatant violation of drink- ing on the beach. As we are aware, the drinking will never stop even if another sponsor is found. However, staff feels it can be controlled and monitored more closely. Measures have been taken to mitigate this problem as much as possible. Event Concepts will have a security force of no less than eight people at any one time for crowd control and to quietly inform individuals of the open container ordinance. This is done at the Cuervo Tournament in Redondo Beach and has worked out very well. As a follow up to last year's tournament,,staff solicited evalu- ations from elected officials, Department Heads, and various merchants in the City. The overwhelming response was approval -2 - of the tournament. The few negative remarks were the concern for the blatant abuse of drinking on the beach. And as indicated above, we believe we have taken steps to mitigate that for next yearns tournament. Also, the Department was approached by a new volleyball organization called The Association of Volleyball Professionals, to sponsor this same tournament. Negotiations with the AVP fell through when that organization withdrew it's proposal in early January. No reason was given for their withdrawal. Respectfully Submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Concur: G egory T. Meyer City Manager "SIMPLE SOLUTIONS SELDOM ARE." - Forbes Magazine AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 1984 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. It is requested that anyone who wishes to speak on any matter, please give their name and address for the record. Any complaints against the -City Council, City Management, or depart- mental operations will be submitted in writing to the City Manager for evaluation by the appropriate department head prior to submission to the City Council. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. -------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PROCLAMATION: City -County Earthquake Awareness Week, February 19-25, 1984. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered after Municipal Matters.) (a) Approval of Minutes: Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 24, 1984. (b) (c) Recommended Action: To approve minutes. Approval of Minutes: Regular adjourned meeting of the City Council held on January 26, 1984. Recommended Action: Demands & Warrants: To approve minutes. February 14, 1984 Recommended Action: To approve Demands & Warrants Nos. through inclusive. 6 � �'-'•. Ky' �n QHS .f-�I.I�G � ._'n -'4 _ • tr ti, y ..'•e-• ►�.. f � L' .s`�!� z r l �x'1�'. o-: •r r � r _ � t '� o 0, � - � [. a - 1� K� ( � : - •' Dom' _ 74 17 .t_rr' �t'�i•yf�-:s_,":' J - { ! { � js,�t yk'r -_)'�s�_Cr,�$rr�jrr?.7+9y,P1 I,rt3S_>�I.�a�',���-i�ri_.N �-:,�?,'l'�,'.:.i.'-.''. x tYri'3_`J� .t-_`'_Yk-`..fi�: __,,_�wtc -r��£. . �rs - µt�sry`� ,r �.'y� .TSw.e8r'•'Y+s'�a"'f��.xr�_M-�,�v3•c�y/f2 ��'�>ff�a.r Y{� + s .a,_2,yS.tT �:r� �a,-'r -,`�1remHs-.r.,�ysr�4„.'.'� .:.is'y.�� �'��.j!.tr-a!, ' �y �.r_�'��1' _r:.y.,.r-•��A�-4�. -'r "€�� r t'C�� ����'��"p+�.I 1 uI' i''c"•- ,-r-���r . ..rI{�$n�!�� }���"',.��.��fIwrhe �l�-1h�+�';+•`r z��-{w :.. J^�..���r�z��ff���,. :f��y.--�,�,pya�9_°d��ra -'•;�fi!v.:;��P'H r,'r_.c -Y'_l- `ro�UI �,',n�r '�yi`t'�a.,�h'p:t,.,,r �`�v�r�'�?.,hSV��{rr�a'�LZ�'`'�S . cIrter,3'f,� 75?,�i a._ �e " ^^.'h Yr >itt�44 � ls.1S' k-rf s�,��, ~?,f�fi,V +�r1y�4.-'y�``�J,`'r.s+�_f .�--^srC<_-.l,wi.�,t-.V�_�e'.=_�_^--'.:a�7.s -._-.:.-,_ .�`�`` ..- .+' ,.'< ` L -r �x r �r�7 ,+z' �`-Kv,ar yri�'r!Y . l."p, t ��l1Sf\ �1i�"krY�v'.er..JS!+%�f� 11F7 �crcR�trV ry i , -�a�� !��.IPgY� ri�rl .lirrip�Ztr��s�i rrtf3a�.r'pa•ir(-•9_�_ jW,.'''_ -ir��_',L�N.trm �7.'..ec3.�'�'lr•_7f.'��'`.t-1r.[�1.P,xr �r`£:�-.-_.;:�.>.',-kt�r, .a ... 'r���yr� .•urgrr"tii��-K�.k�-tt�-`-�yr#rkir,��tas,-`x N+,',�p �•,.+H3'��i�.�.k -f�1�y-`�i' �''`a` �•••ast 5>v,'1ve•Ya���'.,.���ar��,y�+or��-4L43.c�a,"3�3s'`",...i'�'."""T- '��-����.,�q•" r}{`�-��Lr tr�-�-F.i. S:C'sL,.L3`S:;- �T:.-"R+-L:Y�'..�:4_•¢`'�.".-.•.-C�-`f_• ';�i'_�I:� z3�_ z�fi����N,s�-.r >.r§r rry��r�•�.� ` ��-a,� ��.���.T�T!�$r d�NA �}r1r5 rrr-.� �! c.1�i. y'a1°-r°�r^�3s 'Fi�' �r'��c � ' . Y ���`Vae��n�.��,i;�S�:�z��w�� �+s�r'I1`d'-,tk;z�7+y�(y-�i ..�f. r�fr +-_i .'� f •-'.N'`�,.�..��,�"._-..:,'' Li'•,_��^;'�N;� .!._�.ma"'�fYJ_�lr�..4 .:.+jjy�'�Y-. t , ,,'. x✓ r . t r t �'f ! � �`'Ma r�i �' r_ �•.$'t�i�(_ �,t��-�iSE4t..',+ -r..�T�_,_��II, -. .8"'1€T `�y��, -�,j `t».;C?e�`�:t�f.' ~,.•� �,.tS..'-��3�� 3+,'"y�J`� Z�Cf,Lu�f'yf ��'"�V^��4,tS�r7+ -ramE'� 3`��f�r'EtYLi!7.-it•f� i�nT�Yh�'4srt��'iit{�,�em�t_ntm,!'��.;. �;t r ,�tLn3 � . "w-r'-!f"F.�'iS'r���'r7�T �..,.�p�ry+.fk�rr".. yt��iy4'C;Z_��`✓:°3�2,;?:a#'_"{�S..J,J`,'�T_`"_, : ,�'��r.�.-_" �''_�p"�'•r�^"�`z-�=i��r�,a+ y�Y''i}�rts`i•'pm!3-dy I.='!:�_�.-s`�-�,ria;r ?N` ,fpt�`C '` � r p'S I_�'`rc ��'.y<_Y�x�F5��. ,ty A�r •"•y•v� �� _ r'.a+e�'2 _ y�j;ZSj.P�rs��•''�g�.�.�'��`��•,''Firndi �-'.i:•+.�hL3z$'Ha�II.1 irIA„�7'au.� ���',i�A ,.� w�`4rz���v�x'..c s�i-J. .t,.t r”�r�.��'.� ,i'�3� yS `�.�'7y31ffr P�i..,,yi .vkr��pP��`.r ��'r_'.r�•5'��._';_�ti.te.�.: ..i� �P'�_�.it„._��i_ -c:. 'j�..:LA`,_�k'�'� +•:�A.,'.• ,' L � zzF� zr• �rP�,� ir�y n'LIs•�� r�'is rI �'r.d� -�• wrL'asia r a•i ��'ti6 '\p:�ti� �'r� p . r ���!r/'--i rfr.• 7 '1 -tA4r_ c<`'.L �! �r�wR �' -}�/'fty`->+rr�$70r�1it.r�"_._�!�� "#�1i', .--ti.!1 __.i�.'.H!=2":'.._ -Y :. _ \a_ � '`.,-'".� .iaY_�.i J ¢ .�Fm'r I��r t5t r { �r '��dT�YF����tidr77`rrh�,a!.3ti3 :.:�. f� "!��rsI�r�l�Y,4�I�-�k�ry^.�)4cfp,rJ-Tryra'sSyL�i r�t +F''�• �l ✓'',rs��s-jr�1r3I P. - tt4!= -�}�li',•l��; r-Ta.t�5i�F�' Gtr�. �.� ��.,.-'�-,:r`;%'i�_- .�'__.i :�'_._, ' -~_ '- ',+. � yX,.J�r�t� ib.�J e��yt k' 7�/� l. `�,tZ:JC'i�r',s�7*S3 .��jf7r}�`��x+t�'i�aF�l��' C ! - F�1�f"t�•�'`erK „+3�a� ,,', 1 ��'3Fr �`.�'hr&fY"�,s4mae�f-u�.j}riiro•� ytd t� +�yrr�2T��-Sn'Y'a,.f.�.T.- �, Z�f�,r+�s}-� r•+�'i',-�sr�J Lb� ssy�""��rv' }�L�3ryf '���'s 4�._ -��Yi.`:�•i�f��1ti�--l!LT��.P�''_,.. z -•J•-trC��.e4ltT1 �'r�n'.•'_.-•�.i`1.'7-:_n,���S{T,�.'.S_ ♦_ : ,,�•;�+r',7.+a_`•!j-'. .� 1 I?'tQt�.�r•;'rS1�{•�����tf�4r`�ce•�c-y'���'2y,.Y }'�'', .r �Sr�hY 5�< }1",1el�^1 :}gA .� Ir�}R`F�,�:�' �Y.'h tf:Yv. . �1..�'•��7� ���i' y�'-O.'t- ' 7 .�-y �PS�cpoma•i6a,+� ,1e �S; W k ry �41 *QC R4 CNAJr ZF W> mv lll rt T ,1id Tb .f T-_�Z r z�S�«A�'s_w. .� '.��,','--'y,�'�y•:�,^�`'cS_ I:-�_-& r{xti.fS� �.-'��lT c��f '`• rrk�J_ ' -! -�'f s��,}E.•��r 1r''te�x_ 4. .�'-v',t"rr1�P�•r '`+r-'a�;�r �{�r '~ �r 't1r !:.•�.' _-- �=. �•�x•�=?•y... �8 s1,1�iT a_•+�- ••-_;.Y'13�� ° .. � `{ '� :�. _,�...-%' '� '�q i•>.`,ssi r F`- 7l t _ w�' - r � `���}.,^.f .rte. '� - i �1`�•3 _t57rC � ''r'�! - I t� - �y�` a - ^�.. A. ��.�-S`_' F: :� } City Council Agenda - February 14, 1984 (d) Claim for Damages: Aimee L. Walker, 552-A 11th Place, Hermosa Beach, filed January 27, 1984. Recommended Action: To deny claim and refer to this City's insurance carrier. (e) Resolution No. 84- establishing voting precincts and polling places, appointing precinct board members and fixing compensation for the General Municipal Election of April 10, 1984. Recommended Action: To adopt resolution. (f) Request to award a services agreement to Manhattan Car Wash to clean and wash city sedans and pickup trucks. Memorandum from City Manager Gregory T. Meyer dated February 2, 1984. Recommended Action: To approve staff recommendation. (g) Report on Business License Charges for Individual Activities under Section 17-19(A), Class A, Group 2. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (h) Approval of Minutes: Special meeting of the City Council held on February 7, 1984. Recommended Action: To approve minutes. 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. HEARINGS 3. APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO KEEP MORE THAN TWO HOUSEHOLD PETS (THREE DOGS) AT 460 PROSPECT AVENUE. Robert E. Bigelow, Appli- cant. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated January 13, 1984. 4. HEARING TO DISCUSS TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS ON 7TH, 8TH, 9TH, AND 10TH STREETS BETWEEN PROSPECT AVENUE AND THE EAST CITY LIMITS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles Clark dated February 9, 1984. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL FROM DENIAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP, GENERAL PLAN, LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, APPROVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND PARCEL MAPS FOR A, PROJECT SUBMITTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT. Memorandum from Planning Director Pamela Sapetto dated February 8, 1984. 6. APPEAL FROM DENIAL BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS OF A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 906 - 15TH PLACE. Michael Schubach, Appellant. Memorandum from Acting Building Director William Grove dated February 9, 1984. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REPORT ON STATUS OF METER MESSAGES - EFFECT ON REVENUE - ALTERNATE PROPOSAL. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated February 2, 1984. 8. } HEN'S OPEN SUMMER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT SPONSORSHIP CONTRACT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated February 7, 1984. -2- City Council Agenda - February 14, 1984 Municipal Matters - Continued 9. LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROPOSAL FOR REVENUE BONDS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles Clark dated February 9, 1984. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Activity Report (b) Tentative Future Agenda Items (c) Status Report - Police Crime Prevention Program (d) Status update regarding second story addition to the Fire Station (e) January Activity Report - Planning Dept. (f) Hermosa Beach Library re. SB 358 funding (g) Report on Firefighter Auxiliary Program (h) Revenue Report - January, 1984 (i) Expenditure Report - January, 1984 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) ATSF Railroad r -o -w Subcommittee report (b) Business Subcommittee - Report on possible Assessment District (c) City Council Compensation (d) Report from Councilman Barks re. National League of Cities Convention, November, 1983 13. A MEETING OF THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (a) Approval of minutes of January 24, 1984 meeting 14. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC - MATTERS OF AN URGENCY NATURE 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Civil Service Commission, unexpired term ending 7-15-87 Business License Review Board - Mayor appoints for 1 year 391! K q .tom.' 4 �L �� - ..y aCi .3•.MIR x -}�� .t � - - G;:. `• .� '"�$�`I � yi i � L �' rl w �� r 1� tom:.. ° ���" � { - �, ' � -�` i �' } ����1 r- tr i c3 ,i1 n -• c. j t + � 7�i�.- xr"�i T ,�`.1��'At�� i���y.��{.<.. `v .ill= z t�� ��� I�r--r };.' �.•.`,yl � ���' 7 } - ���.'- � .-.YFS�_��}��4f_S�h� l� r� _ -'Y! tl („1{{ la„'. - ,f r`• is -1 car ;'.� �ti z•^r ^��C''{, _ •T ,�'r�-, tSy; ��` ���' � � {`��'p'�_. 5 .IA y.� a;•-"-� iL�..:.�r�•f t_�� �` `' �� ~' .r: �=� Y -,•` IZ. '. n!•c` rl� .h' v •' � ' i- z- _ as/r't S f i r � * r r +1� .may �. ". $t' ?�.+i Yazy ��..� �7t.I .r '•CL -- •+ 2 "�,� , �,IT,y L. I "r �' �`rt'L �. �p 41'+3 �rr --��i•^r��r3 t.• ^ �, A '1� 31 I. ��``o t�� � '!�--� - F zy.s�'�' .,sl �r i � roti- �.' �• t� X � � '�+" l ry�''T'`; j,r_+�.r yi_y. 4� �$� -e� a �•.' �F r � _ � r..A L,F��` , s ,r.f �,•Zr� 1� x .-.r = f�, � ^s.� _ "�•,s' �� Vii; �� "�` `�� �r i �"xlt. iii, .J _� -szt fa fr� ti.k��',trei t; +.c.,�.� - - .t�.-Yr ; ♦l mss' _ k L ♦ a a T`I, yr F �- o:; , t'er y f Y: {3' S: ..,° _-} ,F�•' s>> rn- :sr'�' Jr•t i s , t ij�^� - � �S•-'�t " `` t '•' � �r � t t ..`tt � '! - i. 1y , � �, -=tet �, r�.� � ••fir I.r r-�y ,. ry � 2�-'N -S' ' ti t_ -J' - ., .z� t _ y p. ,� - 7 -„ i. �: �U , - Ar• � r r � y 1 ^- FIS K =ar � '.i'• ,d4 :a 5> �' � �X�y '•,�� 's,�,1�.-_:� �J3 ..� ��'�:rdto-�•P-���a+•�s �a y}'�'t ,r�c��:�. �,�'��f. ,r-°� >r`�/' 4:'. l/•' Y� �R�ylsT ti � 7'�Ya � Ytii - y /+.. y. � 'v�}7' ♦ r,M1E a!� Ij 14 �f' r - ri • jt }t :v ys. �]f�•':. ,• al.r .is :F �- ✓ -•tri r .fir ".�-�--' I _ r� u��<�� k [��}t•+ �i � 1 ��� £ ✓`�..JI df T,1 � ..Y�� I �u,�f y� .� _ , 'S lures` �•t '��' I - �L � -S � F. J � ' ,'7a frt r `+��i ytaylC" z r • tea, Tc. �A■ "!' (Y-w ��M 3�n�j� . t��I `I`�.- -�}� 2` I�s� �1��� t°' _ r•�l lir` ->� ��. ��J� �4 .��`y�.�r 000 7 t 1 • � � 1 �r r L � .Rs � �� ��; ,�•^ • F SIY � 1 a$ti� 2 �=�•- S't"xi �rti`r y `�� c < P 't -.ar �. ..�. .4 J -i I v ,.� s •. h.. {� ,. .ti i f t7 �r s. i.-x r-t. Aa" 1•a_a'' - � t Y L � 1; .•��� '' i�! . c r':; _ . F'r�+P�, t i!#[ SJ�,j'tt"y!r `,st `'•� a� �1 V'1 L r-'` _ .-rc d Yy'� r r ► � 4h n I Irk ! .. - `��/` f • x`�' r � � 1 r �• .. ��'Lf � �„�,�r 1 �'�S� +'t` ��'' ��:' 1 � 1�� r! 3 r . ty 3 ak T��r •cFMr ti r 'ir i"pr 'ra MtR'�.S' ra"ll a�'F .1r ,',`.V{ t - ,+ v1�, r11 J,=K■5a+.,xJ- R :.� ; `. LrtJ! - *1( Z{-•i r""s�' i a s r �;.* S r a'I �,.v <�-� `} Q.e k lY�, ♦ .•"`{, l�t.l ,,,��a4, �• ,`•eL' 'R 'p` .T ;1,�rA��"�'- � \,}' � 1"b !`Ai`�•'�3•, r� ,' jj`�33!�, *'k+.ivRY(,� t�~fi � (~ fa�F._c � '�n�44"e. 'T��'Y -'� � � r � �^r^ y'r? 7y Y, (. - ir, r.{, '�a • i. �• }:� y, 3 3 r '�` ,'4- r• 1' -r >� �� �yy.?` � e �` ,f�� �..' ��.� a Fr _ � 1 �, 1R•� �.� •r '1[��,it `I� a.r� -�, y4` ��n. �� - - :Lr �,ty. -.p :.y -r �1� � t :i_ ]r ;b 1 h L �� b'�i T .���a 4 •F4.� �� :�-� T -"�_ - � i ,jf:+ 7t' R��, -tJ.- ..- � -,»� % a � ,r�t,. t J '�Utr,� � rt + -_>. • int _.�r� � -r' rir 7.� QCs _ .•. �l�� � � d 1 t !1=1f .S � , v nrr . �I - aky;. �' y� .i _ :- . �s �a{� f ,�4 - � � ,3 _. , p ; ds•s•� F -.1- �'; sr� r �, �C� 1 _ � . � ��� k = y �l � , r '' " r � rl �- sz�a 1 .}'s dF• t`. tl� .f ry�•���:r�r'_ �' r' ���iS«Y7 t '�� � 7i µms. ��?�r✓ ��”' r. r��� �3 ��! �� „ r., .,�� .. �i'k' 11Y�� j �,�s, s'•t rS.♦.. 0. '. N. ^C L�-� y'X r � •ei.W.„'3}}R��,.,e.}�C•'���4i ?•�.trr,~ y�� 3 rj4l��je' �:.` �„ ���a�� $ �••l � ��� rMti - � �, s '` i s ! a- ',F,r ' ♦ �� .,, � ilea^., 4 '�' * :;a r 3•`� 3 +^c [�.♦r/s�' l.la... r��.: s 'a:. ._ ti i -. �.?dr�✓'�-4�� 3 y yY TW, E--i x _ r R w to .i j D-.•c'£' y�+" �.c• 3 .'... _ ;yt � :' �� � �� r� •- r } ���.��''�` t�+� :: r .+'t'3�'; �rn^''ti �.-r �+.. r�t'Z�ri� r° c r._ � . a s � f r� r. ' ` t�`' tx` ���� , .- � i ✓s t � �}-P '. " r esti � - ' y •qc. J 1, �I. F M r [. �• �Y � Y � ' r 1 a �•'�' 1+ �' 1 J C�Li • ' �". {s'r R � _ � � ��,s?'�:a, i�'��-." � ���` 1� �r _ ; 3a p�` '"�'� �µ ,�'}�,�' t � - •f _� �� li r`f• �t�;�. Igy, � � �' l T^• rr ic�,S 'r_ 3'1S''�, �- - ,�. �� S'. C'♦ � �' �� 4. +�..� Ste+ - ' _ :� r r . .r- '7' ♦ - r� > r-Y,ti. t71'-+t� - �+yv _� 4t- r14i. .t'6 •' �;` -� ct � �''c, 'r-�1 i . � - a� r � y� �Y. `5�� � ? eft �' `�. � � � ��4 i v y r+'` � •iv�� � '3yrs�r�`��• y fit, -� � �, c,.s , �,�+i �. �• ,•�+a- •rte N•. ` ,yy._ 1 _ r:. a. .S._y- J ; t'a j3�. =.`i -� � .? - •,�a,l�l 1.'�": i "f%' �. � ra�~'� - - t _ ;c ��t • �...�4, +rS a }. �•f,�-�y� �v ya _�' .c�`�„iY,l �.`1 ,�;->;: - �rry _ '{rte' ���. .. • �_�. ♦ - 1.. 'k"��1�. -• r a�-i .:i•it 1 _ t'r .y w.. e � - _ 4 1 � e0' _� a• - �'+ �.'T5 �•�' r-_ r� ri 'lr- ec + ra .• February 14, 1984 Public Works Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 To Whom It May Concern: �ssi�,.b 6�2A I am the property owner at 225 Longfellow, Hermosa Beach. I reside in Manhattan Beach and as a result could not vote on the two referendums pertaining to the establishment of a "Landscaping Maintenance District" or a "Crossing Guard Maintenance District." I will be out of town on February 28th, the date the Council expects to take action. This letter requests some answers to some questions which I will include in this epistle, each question will be underlined, and all of which I would appreciate an answer from you. If you have had landscaping in the past in certain areas, who took care of it and how was it paid for? The same question applies to the crossing guard question. What benefit on landscaping is available in the area of my property at 225 Longfellow? What do you mean by approximately $1.00 per lineal frontage foot? Does approximately mean more or less than $1.00? How have you paid for crossing guards up to this time? Why cannot this payment for crossing guards be continued as it was? I do, however, believe that crossing guards are essential. It is apparent to me that my taxes will escalate substantially as a result of the referendum. I wonder what the City Council does to hold the line on costs? Please reply. Sincerely, �/ •J. N. N. Hamilton 448 Altura Way Manhattan Bch, CA 90266 •rypij�llc� 9p ,�jY/ ��d�'/Yd!// f"�s+ff��d .r ��/p .7.!/►.7/i�i ►�(i' �(P /YtJ'!� / D i ✓ !� )Vd ro rYv�• ��v��v✓ �d �7 %%� �c�'� sr/�%��,'s' �/�` l{fr'/7 ���s7�Pry:7/ a-rv��/��•/J �� VOs� f -�TP AZva a a Vii/ Y861 V 9734 `7 - 4 PC WA •- .. 4�2 'y 1-24 n �, Y �7 7I� N /1711/� r 7 ,. S 10 L9 -CF1. F EE B 14. 1984 tn,;tnc:t2;'jj%; J-7) aL / 4 � .�"'`��:.� .G'``'am , C ALAL� 17 �.,1 v�X illowEle'llitl 71111511151 c, , 6JK)" G/14 ' '— — ' — — ' wk To: The City Clerk of Hermosa Beach On January 24, 1984, the City Council of Hermosa Beach adorted a resolution of intention to order the formation of an assesiment district and to levy rind to collect assessments for landscaping maintenance within the proposed d4strict. The undersigned is the owner of the following described real rrorerty located within the proposed district: c7' 1/, i3�0C/-r L/ /4,9'V�T��� d",'s H F/Z M 0 S p /5 i'J) C'4 The undersigned rrorerty owner objects to the formo �. of said district or the inclu.tion c: the unders-i.ffned?s79L9 -; real rrorerty within the ^roroned district. ` C/tyOfY Clerk 1 &each Dated: STEPHEN J. LANDAU 138 First Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 To: The City Clerk of Hermosa Beach On January 24, 1984, the City"Council of Hermosa Beach adopted a resolution'of intention to order the formation of an assessment district and to levy and to collect aGsessments for crossing guard maintenance within the proposed district. The undersigned is the ovrnpr of the following described real nropertY located wirhin the proposed district: 14//'ZrtqsP �f �AC4. The undersigned property owner objects to the formation of .said district or the inclusion of the undersigned s real property within the proposed district. Dated: ,2- Z F - � STEPHEN J. LANDAU 138 First Street Hermosa Beach, CA 91,1251"T' 0 To: The City Clerk of Hermosa Beach On January 24, 1984, the City Council of Hermosa Beach adorted a resolution of intention to order the formation of an assessment district and to levy and to collect assessments for landscaping maintenance within the proposed district. The undersigned is the owner of the following described real rronerty located within the prorosed district: The undersiffned rror-erty owner objects to the for.matlrbrF,.gj �4 of said district or the inclu..i-ion of the unders.i' real rrorerty within the ^roroged district. Dated: To: The City Clerk of Hermosa Beach On January 24, 1984, the.City.Council of Hermosa Beech adopted a resolution of intenti'on to order the formation of an assessment district and to levy and to collect aGsessments for crossing guard maintenance within the prorosed district. The undersigned is the owner of the following described real property- located wi'_hin the proposed district: c The undersigned property owner objects to the formation Of said district or the inclusion of the undersigned s real property within the proposed district. Dated: To: The City Clerk of Hermosa Beach On January 24, 1934, the City Cou::cil of Her-nosa Beach adorted a resolution of intention to order the formation of an assesgr.ent district and to levy And to collect assen.iments for landscaning maintenance within the proposed district. The undersigned is the c real rroperty located w: -3 act t 41- 43-45 Y I SZ-- 3 -7 re •o -y The undersic-ned rror.erty of said district or the real rrorerty within the Dated: ';?,- '2. W- RIq- wner of the following described_ thin the prorosed distri i ^4 eft- /.` G 4�•rv��� owner ob iects to th-, PorftrQ,�"ipp �s�T inclusion of the undep,s.icne6"Pi,,,� \y1 ^roroged district. `�`� `4 To: The City Clerk of Hermosa Beach "lee. % T-- f-IG�1, -4- On January 24, 1934, the.City_Council of Hermosa Beach ado-oted a resolution of intention to order the formation of an assessment district and to levy and to collect agsegsments for crossing euard maintenance within the proposed district. The undersi7ned is the owner of the following described real nrooerty located within the rrorosed district: 133 ` oma/ sr H.t:: r' f3c-,4 90 -->-.r441- The undersiered property owner objects to the formation Of said district or the inclusion of the undersigned s real nrorerty within the proposed district. Dated: z/ --x To: The City Clerk of Hermosa Beach On January 24, 1984, the City Council of Hermosa Beach adorted a resolution of intention to order the +or,nation of an assessment district and to leve and to collect assessments for landscarinr mmintenance within the proposed district. The undersigned the owner of the following described real r.ronerty located within the urorosed district: L© � The under3ic-ned rrorerty owner ob iects to the fo tzon of said district or the inciug i on c,� the under!Z.�neXi's real rror•Prt-y within the-roroaed district.��� 7 f,:'F`► `� 12 To: The City Clerk of Hermans Beach On January 24, 19849 theCouncil of Hermosa Beach adorted a resolution of int,�nticn to order the for-,aticri of an Assessment district r,,id to levy and to collect a4sessment3 for crossing ev:rrd maintenance within the prc,)osed district. The undersigned is the owner of the following described real rror.erty- located wi'-hin the rrorosed district: -�ov jg4��eAJ Al ol= o f iC I N S _K `{ 6 The undersigned rronerty owner objects to the formation of said district or the inclusion of the underaidned s real rrorerty within the prouosed district. Dated: 2125 �3`/ 40-r, i 3 i "57 Co b R, 14o6k? 0"a CITV OF H ERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO- Gregory T. Meyer, City Manager DATE- FPhrunry 14, 1454 Chronology of Required Actions for Approval SUBJECT --of City/School District Development FROM- Charles 1. Post, City Attorney Agreement I recommend the following actions be taken in the following order to approve the City/School District Development Agreement: 1. A MOTION to certify that: a.) the final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA. b.) the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in one final EIR prior to approving the project. c.) the unavoidable cumulative impacts identified in the EIR to traffic within the City are the result of regional demands and not of this project The overriding consideration for approval of this project is the acquisition ofi permanent open space by the City. 2. A MOTION to approve Resolution # (General Plan) 3. A MOTION to introduce and waiver of first reading of Ordinance # (Zone Change) ' 4. A MOTION to asopt Resolution // ( Tentative Parcel Map) 5. A MOTION to introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance # (Development Agreement Approval) Respectfully Submitted, - a" �Iel �P' /�'— Charles J. Post City Attorney 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMQSA BEACH AMENDING CERTAIN DESIGNATIONS ON THE MAP OF LAND USES OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PLAN TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE FIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT SITES. WHEREAS, the present Open Space Element of the General Plan assumes all possible steps will be taken to preserve open space recreation land without causing detriment to the education system; and WHEREAS, there is insufficient publicly owned open space land, in the City; and WHEREAS, zoning does not and cannot prohibit private use of Hermosa Beach City School District property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the declining enrollment in the Hermosa Beach City School District and its detrimental effect on School District operations and the well-being of the community. NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby resolves as follows: Section I. 17 18 19 20 21 Section 2. 22 23 24 25 Section 3. 26 27 Section 4. 28 The competing goals of preserving open space and preserving the education system may be reconciled and furthered by increasing the amount of publicly owned open space land while acknowledging existing development rights on some Hermosa Beach City School District properties. This reconciliation is accomplished in the reallocation of General Plan designations enacted in this Resolution together with the proposed development agreement being contemplated between the City and School District. The general plan designations are hereby amended as shown on the attached map, marked Exhibit "A". That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall make a minute entry of the passage and adoption thereof .]eG_^k6wo`woH�•.+"-. ....�iM141're.. ,ti%A�4'`.. c. ...��.;.:r...�.3F^-c:44.. :�: '.. ...., �.r ....: .:. .. ___. ... _ . e._ .. _ v.-.. .,) ... wt�ea NilwY9ar.¢0�3_ } r r , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: in the records of the proceedings of the City Council in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1984. ------------------------------------------------------------------ PRESIDENT Qf the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK APPROV D AS TO FO . a" g-, 19 v CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY, COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERmbSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE FIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT SITES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach has considered and enacted amendments to the Land Use Designations of the General Plan and Local Coastal Plan which make the zoning inconsistent with the amended general plan; and WHEREAS, the City is required to make its zoning consistent with its General Plan; and WHEREAS, this ordinance changes the zoning so as to be consistent with the General Plan. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: Section 1. The boundries of zone classificationsshown on the offical zoning map of the City are hereby amended to those shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A". Section 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. Section 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be publishedin the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, _,California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1984. PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK AP V AS TO F%q. CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 i✓ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP # 16022, 16023, AND 16128 LOCATED AT FIVE SCHOOL SITES, SOUTH SCHOOL, NORTH SCHOOL, HERMOSA VIEW SCHOOL, HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL, AND PROSPECT HEIGHTS SCHOOL. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach held a public hearing on 1/3/84, 1/17/84, and 1/31/84 to consider tentative parcel map #16022, 16023, and 16128 located at South School, North School, Hermosa View School, Hermosa Valley School, and Prospect Heights School; and WHEREAS, the City Council on 2/14/84 finds: a. that the proposed maps are consistent with applicable general and specific plans; b. that the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans; C. that the sites are physically suitable for this type of development; th -- -- �'=:� �•_` .i j ..:.a;f".� ^i''• - �L�.�.vY'�.3�t}` ,.il ,C' ,moity of development; e. that the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage; f. that the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and g. that the design or the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by --the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Approve tentative parcel maps #16022, 16023, and 16128 located at the five school sites: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 South School North School Hermosa Veiw School Hermosa Valley School Prospect Heights School subject to the following conditions: Any project developed on the site shall: 1. Submit a complete utility plan which is approved by a registered civil engineer procured by the city at applicant's expense; all utilities to be underground. 2. Integrate all meters, utility service connections, major roof chimneys, pipes or structures with the design of the building and screened architecturally and/or by landscaping. 3. Construct all public improvements such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drains anc drives, to be approved by a civil engineer to be procured by the City at applicant's expense. 4. File a final map within eighteen (18) months from the date of the tentative map approval or it shall become null and void. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Section 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall make a minute entry of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council in the minutes of the. meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADQPTED this day of , 1984. PRESIDENT. of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Calfornia. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: --------------------------------------------------------- CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FO m: ---------------------CITY ATTORNEY DATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENACTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach has considered and enacted certain General Plan, Local Coastal Plan, and Zoning Map changes; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enact a development agreement which embodies these changes and other subjects required or permitted to be in development agreements; and WHEREAS, development agreements may be approved only by ordinance pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867.5. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain a follows: Section 1. The Development Agreement between the -City and the Hermosa Beach School District entitled "Development Agreepent, City of Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Beach City School District" is hereby enacted. Th Agreement is consistent with the General Plan. There are no applicable specific plans. Section 2. There shall be added to the Hermosa Beach Zoning Appendix a new section number to read in full as follows: "— Approved Development Agreements. a.) On there was adopted by ordinance # Development Agreement between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District a copy of which is on file wit the City Clerk. Section 3. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. Section 4. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption the City Clerk sha!1 cause this ordinance to be published in the easy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: Reader, a weekly - newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1984. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO F5y: CITY ATTORNEY .^"3FM1i "7v�a'.:i Sr��«�.ii,;,Y �e.u.-.:+1V �.3.-• :Wn'�. ss..� _..�.u. • - �w ....�...i-r�;-�.. .... HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL February 7, 1984 REGULAR MEETING of FEBRUARY 14, 1984 SCHOOL SITE PROPOSALS Recommendation Staff recommends that: (1) That the City Council approve the project application contingent upon the changes described in the analysis section. (2) That the City Council certify the Final EIR for this project. (3) That the City Council introduce and waive the first reading of the attached ordinance. Background Due to declining enrollment, the Hermosa Beach School District --the project applicant proposes to consolidate the entire student body of the district and all school operations at the existing Hermosa Valley School site. Two elementary schools in the District have already been closed --Prospect Heights School in 1977, and South School in 1980. Furthermore, two currently underenrolled elementary schools --North School and Hermosa View School --are scheduled to be closed in 1985 and their students transferred to Hermosa Valley School. In order to accommodate the additional students, Hermosa Valley School will require renovation and new improvements. As a means of financing the improvements at Hermosa Valley School, the District proposes the sale of the South School site. To prepare the South School site for sale and future development, the School District proposes to rezone the property for residential and park purposes and to amend the General Plan accordingly. In addition to the proposed zone changes and General Plan amendments for Hermosa Valley School and South School, the School District is also proposing a series of zone ' changes and General Plan amendments on the remaining three school sites --Hermosa View School, North School and Prospect Heights School (see attachment I). There are no plans to sell these sites in the near future. The School District has been experiencing a steady decline in enrollment. The following is a summary of enrollment history for the School District: 1962-1963 2,141 students 1966-1967 1,918 students 1970-1971 1,758 students 1974-1975 1,368 students 1978-1979 1,049 students 1979-1980 944 students 1980-1981 910 students 1981-1982 884 students 1982-1983 815 students The School District is specifically asking for the following changes: (See attached ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN SUMMARY). To accompany these changes is a request to adopt a development agreement and to amend the Local Coastal Plan accordingly. On December 19, 1983, the Board of Zoning Adjustments reviewed the environmental impact report (see attached EIR for their comments). The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and EIR on January 3, 17, and 31 of 1984. The Planning Commission denied the project application on 1-31-84. Attached is Resolution #84-3 which describes their action: Analysis GENERAL PLAN The existing community park and recreation areas (exclusive of the beach) represents only .74 acres per thousand persons, which is well below various national standards that range from 2.5 to 10 acres per thousand persons. The net effect of this project is that 7.10 acres of General Plan open space would be converted to residential uses. The open space element of the General Plan: "In order to assure that the open spaces shown on the Open Space plan shall remain available to the citizens of Hermosa Beach, the following action plan is to be followed: Policy 24: School Grounds. The City and the Hermosa Beach School District shall maintain the agreement whereby those school lands shown on the Open Space Plan as permanent open space shall be preserved in public ownership. To accomplish this, the City may: 1. Purchase or lease surplus school properties should such become available, -2- 1. so that property can be maintained for open space and recreation use. 2. Prohibit the use of designated open space for development for other than open space purposes even though sold to private ownership." The school district's project proposes to preserve, by virtue of sale donation, some open space at each site (attachment 1): Proposed City Acquisition Prospect Heights Playgrounds .57 acres South School Park Site 1.30 acres North School Play Field 2.22 acres Seaview Parkette .29 acres TOTAL: 4.38 acres This proposal is consistent with the following statement derived from the open space element: "All possible steps will be taken to maintain property owned by the Hermosa Beach Elementary School District for open space/recreation use without detriment to the education system." It can be argued that the school district's future efforts might be hampered through inadequate funding, which could have been avoided had the school district been permitted to sell its surplus land. Although staff is of the opinion that a greater percentage of school district land set aside for permanent open space would be preferable, the fagts remain that the school district: 1. By State Law, does not have the option to "give" property to the City and the City does not own the property designated open space in the Genral Plan, and therefore, must consider the property rights of the district from a legal perspective; and 2. Requires funds in order to centralize and more efficiently provide an effective service to this community. "1 he school district is funded by all property tax payers, yet not all property tax payers derive a benefit from the school district; many households have no children. Now that the school district is considering revamping its activities and departing with much of its underused property, it can validly be argued that such property should transform into a use that benefits the community at large, i.e., the majority of those who have provided the revenue to operate the school system through the years; a benefit to the communtiy at large is open space. The school district's intention of centralizing its activities is a logical move. It is also quite apparent that it will require additional funding to adequately provide for the additional students, administrative offices, maintenance equipment, increased parking, baseball and soccer fields at Hermosa Valley School, new landscaping buffers, etc. Therefore, the sale of additional sites can be viewed as augmenting planned improvements at the central location, and as serving as a contingency fund to mitigate unforeseeable circumstances. The comparisons between the existing zoning and proposed zoning are outlined as follows: School Site Existing Zoning Potential Proposed Zoning Potential South School Unzoned R -1 -open space 99 units/1.3 acre 13 units park site North School Unzoned R -1 -open space R-1 27 units and 10 units open space Prospect Heights Unzoned R -1 -open space R-1=12 units and 16 units open space Hermosa View Unzoned R -1 -open space R-1=29 units 29 units open space Hermosa Valley R-3 and open space -0- units all open 105 units space Sea View Parkette Unzoned R-1 -0- sell to City 3 units TOTAL: 185 Units 167 Units The zoning proposed by the school district has the net effect of reducing the potential number of units which could be built on the School sites. The proposal reduces the -4- potential by 18 units. This premise is based on construction of units i.e, single family residences or apartment units which require no descretionary actions on the part of the City. However, if a planned or condominium development were proposed, the project would have to be consistent with the General Plan according to Government Code Section 65680. In this case, the only portion of school property which can presently be residentially developed is the northern 2.3 acres zoned R-3/low density (maximum 13 du/a) which would yield a maximum of 30 units. PARCEL MAPS Three parcel maps have been submitted, the first (map #16022) is associated with subdivision of Prospect Heights School into two parcels, one to be sold to the City, the other to be eventually developed residentially. The second (map #16023) demonstrated the subdivision of Hermosa View School into two parcels, one to be sold to the City, the other to be eventually developed residentially. The third (map #16128) describes the division of North School into two larger parcels so that the existing small lot subdivisions are deleted. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS The purpose of the development agreement is to protect both the City and the School District that the stipulations agreed to pursuant to this project application are met. It guarantees the City the ability to acquire more open space land and guarantees the School District the zone changes irrespective of future Boards or City Councils. The development agreement is consistent with local and state requirements (Government Code Section 65864-65869.5); there is a question about Provisions 10(a), (4), and (b)(4) which indicate R-1 zone and low density for Seaview Parkette (Hermosa View School). The inconsistency here is that the application for zone change (et al) for Hermosa View School indicated that Seaview Parkette would be sold to the City. Staff recommends this property be rezoned to open space. EIR REVIEW It is the responsibility of the Planning Commission and the City Council to include the environmental information presented in the draft EIR as part of their decision-making -5- process. If there are any negative environmental impacts indicated, then the mitigation measures identified in the EIR must be required as a condition of approval of the project. It is also the responsibility of the Commission and Council to review the EIR and comment if there are any environmental impacts which have not been addressed. The BZA and Planning Commission's comments have been responded to in the attachments. Any comments made by State agencies will also be given to your Honorable Body. The Council is expected to certify the Final EIR. Please see attachment for a further description of the EIR process. In reviewing the draft EIR, the Council should be aware that the project description addresses the original proposal of the School District. The School District has proposed to the Council the alternative described as the environmentally superior alternative (VI -3). LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENT If the School District's project is approved, the City and applicant would then go to the Coastal Commission and request an amendment to the Local Coastal Plan to record the adjustments west of Valley Drive (Coastal Zone), i.e., North School, Hermosa Valley School, and South School. COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT As a result of the Planning Commission's meetings on this matter, staff has heard several issues raised which, in our opinion, deserve further consideration by Your Honorable Body. Specifically: A. General Plan/Zoning Perhaps South School should accommodatea larger recreational facility than currently proposed, particularly if the portion of the property is to be developed residentially. If a playing field were to be incorporated on the site, at least two acres of land should be donated rather than 1.3 (a soccer field requires [1.49 acres] 64,800 square feet). Staff suggests the portion of the property to be donated should be indicated in the development agreement rather than left up to negotiations between the developer and the City at the time of donation. As to density on the South School site, it can reasonably be argued that the density should be reduced to 60-85 units which represents 18-25 du/a on the portion not being donated (3.38) and 11-16 du/a on the overall parcel (5.38). -6- Residential development of this site should be not only compatible with the surrounding area but should have the infrastructure available to support it. The traffic impacts described in the EIR of 99 units will be difficult to mitigate given the existing infrastructure. Zoning on South School should reflect the development standards requested. R-3 zoning is not compatible with mediun; density residential development. The appropriate zone is planned development - R'-2 where the development standards are agreed to in the development agreement: i.e., height of 35 feet and all other development standards equal to R-2. B. The Development Agreement 1. The property to be donated at South School should be specifically designated in the development agreement and be consistent with the Staff recommendation in "A" above. 2. Why shouldn't the mineral rights of the property to be bought by the City be retained by the City. 3. The Zoning of South School should be designated R-2 planned development with 35 foot height limit. 4. Some guarantee in the development agreement should be given that North and Hermosa View Schools will not be developed for a given period of time; i.e., five to ten years. 5. A provision should be made to allow a grace period for the parties to "cure" any conditions not met. For example, if the City's check to the School District for purchase of the property is lost in the mail, the City has a ten day grace period to reissue the check. 6. Unified Building Code standards to be met by any projects on the sites should be those in effect at the time of construction. (Section 7 -page 8) 7. Seaview Parkette should be zoned open space. -7- aojaaara guruueTd oll@deS ef;DWed 8- aa2?euew ATID aa�C W •,� Cao aa� :anauoo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 84- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDIN THE ZONING MAP, GENERAL PLAN, LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND PARCEL MAPS #16022, 16023, AND #16128 FO A PROJECT SUBMITTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 14, 1984, to cor sider this matter; and WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach School District is experiencing a continous delcin in student enrollment; and WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach School District presently maintains two close public schools, and intends to close two more in 1985; and WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach School District intends on centralizing all of it services at Hermosa Valley School, which will require measurable additional funding and WHEREAS, the most logical means of funding these centralizing efforts (at Hermosa Valley School) is through the sale of its surplus property; and WHEREAS, the proposed densities at South School, North School, Hermosa View School and Prospect Heights School as modified by the City Council are both consistent with their surrounding environment and the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the open space land to be dedicated and sold to the City will greatly benefit the community's marginal stock of open space. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: Section 1. That the zoning map of the City of Hermosa Beach be amended to reflect changes to the following five school district sites (as' indicated in Figure I): South School Hermosa Valley School -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 North School Hermosa View School Prospect Heights School Section 2. That the Land Use and Open Space Elements of the General Plan be amended to reflect changes to the five school district sites (as indi- cated in Figure 1) named in Section 1 above. Section 3. That the Development Agreement submitted here as Attachment II, be entered into by the Hermosa Beach School District and the City of Hermosa Beach with the following amendments: 1. The property to be donated at South School should be specifically desig- nated in the development agreement and two acres to be donated .for public park purposes and the remainder to be developed for 60-85 re- sidential units. 2. The mineral rights of the property to be bought by the City be retained by the City. 3. The Zoning of South School to be designated R-2 planned development with 35 foot height limit. 4. That North and Hermosa View Schools will not be developed for ten years. 5. A ten day grace period will be allowed for any conditions not met when required for a specific date. 6. Unified Building Code standards to be met by any project on the sites will be those in effect at the time of construction. (Section 7, page8.) 7. Seaview Parkette shall be zoned open space. Section 4. That an application be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission requesting changes to this City's Local Coastal Program, -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 `. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 such changes being as outlined in Figure 1. Section 5. That Parcel Maps #16022, 16023 and 16128 be approved. Section 6. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. Section 7. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be Pub- lished in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circu- lation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED,' APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1984. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 9 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles, 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the THE DAILY BREEZE a newspaper of general circulation, printed and pub- lished DAILY in the City of Torrance County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State - of California, under the date of July 31st, 1952 Case Number 601566 that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), hos been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: Feb 4 all in the year 19 84 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated of Torrance 6 Feb 84 Pnia, this- day of �^,, 19 Signature The Daily Breeze 5715 TORRANC! kVD. • TO"ANCE CAl1fORNU1 90" 17177 540 5511. 772 6281 This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stomp Proof of Publication of DB 2-145 Public Not&ee Paste Clipping of Notice SECURELY - DB2 -145' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH �,TUBLIC.. N.PTICri APPEAL FROM DENIAL BY.THE PLANNING COM- ' MISSION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DIS- TRICT PROPOSED PROJECT. Appellant :Marilyn Harris Corey, District Superintendent, on behalf of the Hermosa Beach City School District. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a Public Hearing on February 14,1984 to consider an appeal from denial by the Planning Commission of 'the Hermosa Beach :School District proposed project including Zone Changes, General Plan Amendments, Local Coastal "Plan Amendment and Development Agreement ap- proval for the following elementary school sites: Her- mosa Valley School (rezone 2.2 acres to open space), t North School (27 units, 2.22 acres sold to City as park),- ; Hermosa View School (29 units, .30 acre sold to City for Weights 2.42 acres sold to City for open space), Prospect I Heights School (12 units, .57 acre sold to City for park), and South School (Subdivision 99 units, 1.3 acres donat- �ed to City as park). Marilyn Harris Corey, District Superintendent, on behalf of the Hermosa Beach City i School District, appellant SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamber at 1315 Valley Drive, Her - mesa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED are invited to participate and speak at this hearing at the above time and place. Persons wishing to send written com- munication on this project should write to the Planning Department in care of City Hall at the above address by February 8,1984. For further information, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984. - ' GREGORY T. MEYER Dated: 2-2-84 City Manager Pub.: Feb. 4,1984 ! ptTV �\ i C, cy tP l ^ O i i• r 0 �1 N I N i i All Y / ! Y90� e 4, �l �3 E •1 •y�r ;r ,,� � •,�� :tea, .,-.�. � ,�� February 1, 1 P.O. Box Number 338 Hermosa Baach, California 90254 14 MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BOARD John Cioffi Karen Gale Sheila D. Miller, J.D. Carol G. Reznichek Leslie N. White DELIVERED BY HAND SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Marilyn Harris Corey (213)376-8961 Dear Mayor Brutsch and Members of the City Council: School Sites - Appl-'L.cation Zone Chauiges, General Plan Amendment, Coastal Plan Amend- ment, Parcel Maps, Develop=ent Agreement The purpose of this letter is to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission at its meeting of January 31, 1984. The Board respectfully requests that this appeal'be agendized at the February 14, 1984, City Council meeting and that the public notice for said meeting appears in the Daily Breeze on or about February 3, 1984, at District expense. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Marilyn Harris Cor District Superintendent 1jHC/mg cc: Greg Meyer, City DAanager t C)b, 0c,LZk Y &Ws�- Mayor Gary Brutsch and m Sc / Members of the City Council L— -- City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Brutsch and Members of the City Council: School Sites - Appl-'L.cation Zone Chauiges, General Plan Amendment, Coastal Plan Amend- ment, Parcel Maps, Develop=ent Agreement The purpose of this letter is to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission at its meeting of January 31, 1984. The Board respectfully requests that this appeal'be agendized at the February 14, 1984, City Council meeting and that the public notice for said meeting appears in the Daily Breeze on or about February 3, 1984, at District expense. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Marilyn Harris Cor District Superintendent 1jHC/mg cc: Greg Meyer, City DAanager t C)b, February 13, 1984 Hermosa Beach City Council City Hall Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear City Council Members: As a Hermosa Beach resident and single mother of a pre-school child, I would like to express my concerns about the sale of Hermosa Beach elementary schools, and in particular, the South School site. South School is presently being leased and used as a day-care center for preschool children. Good day care centers are hard to find, and St. Clare's Preschool is one of the best I have seen. It is also one of the only Catholic -oriented preschools available in the South Bay. The owner of St. Clare's would like to expand to include an infant -care center, a kindergarten and a family and marriage counselling center. Infant care centers are currently almost non-existent, and infant care costs privately are prohibitive, particularly for single parents. St. Clare's has a particular emphasis on single parents, and provides activities geared to specific single parent family needs. I personally object to the sale of the South School site and the development: of 99 condominiums because I feel St. Clare's Preschool is providing a much-needed community service. We do not need more condominium development in Hermosa Beach. What we do need is a community that is oriented towards the needs of families, and this includes providing proper school facilities which segregate children by age to minimize drug exposure from older children. I have lived in Hermosa Beach for 9 years, and I hope to be able to stay. However, if the city cannot provide adequate schooling for my child, I will have no choice but to move elsewhere. I do hope that the elected officials of our city will consider the needs of the many parents in Hermosa Beach before deciding the fate of our city schools. Thank you for your consideration. 4_Sinerely, Sue Waters 713-1/2 Loma Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 376-2877 iNlICR' T110 i I CALIFORNIA—OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor OF RESOURCES, ENERGY, AND PERMIT ASSISTANCE .NTH STREET MENTO, CA 95814 3/-yc-/ —/ February 10, 1984 Ms. Pamela Sapetto SUPPLEMENTAL City of Hermosa Beach INFORMATION 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: SCH# 83122803, Hermosa Beach School District School Site Planning Project Dear Ms. Sapetto: The State Clearinghouse sut mitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have cats. This letter certifies only that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft envirormiental docLmientso, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (EIR Guidelines, Section 15161.5). Where applicable, this should not be cor5.strued as a waiver of any jurisdictional authority or title interests of th-2 State of California. The project may still require approval from state agencies with permit authority or Jurisdiction by law. If so, the state agencies will have to use the environmental document in their decision -:raking. Please contact thiem imr- r,,ediately after the doczrrr--nt is finalized with a copy of the final docL ent, the Notice of Determination, adopted :mitigation measures, and any statements of overriding considerations. Once the doc=ent is adopted (Negative Declaration) or certified (final ESR) and if a decision is :made to approve the project, a Notice of Dete=Liration miust be filed with the Country Clerk. If the project rE uires discretionary approval from any state acency, the Notice of Determination ;rust also be filet-4 wit"i the Secretary for Rercurces (MR Guidelines, Sections 15083 (_) and 1-085 (h) ) . Since; e—' 1, '-;,.'e r ry Rcbe_ February 13, 1984 Hermosa Beach City Council City Halal Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear City Council Members: Sly RPLE.�,"1=i�1 TAL INF 0 t,IMIA T 10- N As a Hermosa Beach resident and single mother of a pre-school child, I would like to express my concerns about the sale of Hermosa Beach elementary schools, and in particular, the South School site. South School is presently being leased and used as a day-care center for preschool children. Good day care centers are hard to find, and St. Clare's Preschool is one of the best I have seen. It is also one of the only Catholic -oriented preschools available in the South Bay. The owner of St. Clare's would like to expand to include an infant -care center, a kindergarten and a family and marriage counselling center. Infant care centers are currently almost non-existent, and infant care costs privately are prohibitive, particularly for single parents. St. Clare's has a particular emphasis on single parents, and provides activities geared to specific single parent family needs. I personally object to the sale of the South School site and the development of 99 condominiums because I feel St. Clare's Preschool is providing a much-needed community service. We do not need more condominium development in Hermosa Beach. What we do need is a community that is oriented towards the needs of families, and this includes providing proper school facilities which segregate children by age to minimize drug exposure from older children. I have lived in Hermosa Beach for 9 years, and I hope to be able to stay. However, if the city cannot provide adequate schooling for my child, I will have no choice but to move elsewhere. I do hope that the elected officials of our city will consider the needs of the many parents in Hermosa Beach before deciding the fate of our city schools. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Site Waters 713-1/2 Loma Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 376-2877 1, .T/ �.-s/ � Lt/! � 4'�a�`� �y�JisAIGS �.J c� :lC'�` ��F�/,:! ta•'^ ez,CJ,✓�: � /-�'.�irs��� 7,4 Ci+'/ �('�; arc s%,�u✓ /C r2C� -- Cta��!�s 611 SUPPLUIENITAL IiJEATi(J)N February 7, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of February 14, 1984 MEN'S OPEN SUMMER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT SPONSORSHIP CONTRACT Recommendation It is recommended that Your Honorable Body approve the attached contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and Event Concepts for joint sponsorship of the Men's Open Volleyball Tournament, July 21 and 22, 1984, as recommended by Staff and the Community Resources Commission. Background Event Concepts sponsored this Tournament last year, July, 1983. At that time, the City received total revenue of $2,792.50. Expenses for the tournament were $1,340.10. The net gain from that tournament was $1,452.40. . Analysis The tournament of 1983 was very successful. However, one area of possible potential trouble is the blatant violation of drink- ing on the beach. As we are aware, the drinking will never stop even if another sponsor is found. However, staff feels it can be controlled and monitored more closely. Measures have been taken to mitigate this problem as much as possible. Event Concepts will have a security force of no less than eight people at any one time for crowd control and to quietly inform individuals of the open container ordinance. This is done at the Cuervo Tournament in Redondo Beach and has worked out very well. As a follow up to last year's tournament, staff solicited evalu- ations from elected officials, Department Heads, and various merchants in the City. The overwhelming response was approval -2 - of the tournament. The few negative remarks were the concern for the blatant abuse of drinking on the beach. And as indicated above, we believe we have taken steps to mitigate that for next year's tournament. Also, the Department was approached by a new volleyball organization called The Association of Volleyball Professionals, to sponsor this same tournament. Negotiations with the AVP fell through when that organization withdrew it's proposal in early January. No reason was given for their withdrawal. Respectfully Submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Concur: G`7 egory T. Meyer FF City Manager -anon auq go sbuTgsTT AqT -OTTgnd TTP pup aTnpauOs uoTgpToossV TTpgAaTTOA aoopgnO TPUOTgpN auq uT SPP 'saagsod 'saTnpauos apTM-anoS, TTP UT uad0 gOpag psOwaaH agq apnTOuT TTTM sgdaouoD quaAg (L •UOTgngTagsTp aOJ aTgTsuodsaa ST sgdoouoD quaAg 'SNIZVOVW gIKgAgrIgOA HDKgg 3o sanssT uad0 gopag psouzaaH TpToads 0001S go wnWTUTut p pup quana au} go gaoddns UT Saagsod 000'Z go wnwTuTui p aonpoad TTTM sgdoouoD quaAg (9 '000'OT$ 3o aangTpuadxa gaoddns BUTSTgaanpp umurTuTui p aaqupapnb TTTM sgdaouoD quaAg (S • Aauoui azTad agq jog oTgpTT ASID auq ST quana ou uI '000'OTS To ascend azTad uintuTuTui p aaqupapnb TTTM sgdoouoD quaAg • {, 'ZZ Pup TZ ATnr 'sggBTU Appuns pup AppangpS 'dn-xoTd uspaq TpquauiaTddns sanog anoj go wnuiTxpw p jog sgSOO Apd TTTM sgdoouoD quaAg (8 •apaA snOTAaad sp UOTgpOOT amus gp !sgaTTOq aTgpgaod anog oq do apTAoad TTTM sgdaouoD quaAg (Z 'b86T 'ZZ -TZ ATnr sganoo TTpgAaTTOA anuaAV aaTd auq go asn jog OSL'T$ go aa; p AZID auq oq Apd 'Aupdiuoo aaaq aoCpw p woa_ gaoddns dTusaosuods BUTUTpb uodn 'TTTM sgdaouoD quaAg (T :SMOTTOJ sp paaabp ST qT aaogaaaus •uad0 uopag psoivaOH t86T auq og papbaa ggTM dTgSUOTgpTaa p buTaaqua JO SnoaTsap aap AZIO pup Dg (o •uad0 gOpag psouiaOH agg BUTpnTO -UT 'squawPuanoq TTpgAaTTOA gopaq sabpgs ATTpnuup pup 'pTuaO;TTpD 'gOpag psOuraaH UT sagopaq saagsTUTuipp AZID (q -anon TTpgAaTTOA uopag oad auq BUISTadwoo sguauipuanoq TTpgAaTTOA gopaq TpuOTssagoad sagowOad ATTpnuup uoTgM Aupduioo UOTgouioad saTps p ST Dg (p :sgOPJ BUTMOTTo3 aqq Oq papbaa ggTM ' (ASID) HDVag VSOWn IEH JO ASID auq Pup (Dg) uoTgpaodaoo pTuaoJTTpD p '*DNI 'SZdgDNOD ZNHAH uaaMgaq pup Aq PivaogTTpD 'gopag psouiaaH gp ' V86T IVT Aapnagaa uo oquT paaaqua ST quauiaaabp sTgs LLD1dwdddJ 8) Event Concepts will provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, its officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage. 9) Event Concepts will provide a tournament scoreboard, volleyballs, trophies and fees for referees, at no cost to the CITY. Event Concepts has the option to use the CITY'S scoreboard. 10) EC will pay the cost for Police officers to supervise the event both days; the chief of police will mandate the num- ber of officers and hours worked. In the event of an emer- gency or other situation arising which necessitates addi- tional security, Event Concepts is responsible for the additional costs incurred. 11) Event Concepts will supply a security force of their own, minimum of eight at any one time to supervise the crowd and alert all present to the "Open Container" Ordinance of the City. All such personnel shall be wearing identifiable T-shirts. 12) Event Concepts will be permitted to sell custom Hermosa Beach Open volleyball T-shirts at the beach subject to prior approval of the graphics by the CITY of HERMOSA BEACH. 13) Event Concepts will have the first right of refusal to sponsor the event in the years 1985 and 1986, with a new agreement signed no later that December of each year. Each party shall review the success of the event following its conclusion, and either party may terminate continua- tion or renewal of this agreement by submitting written notification of termination to the other party prior to August 31, 1984. 14) Event Concepts will collect entry fees from players which projects to approximately 40 teams at $10 apiece, or a total of $400. Event Concepts shall pay all entry fees to CITY. 15) The CITY will permit the attachment of the sponsor's name to the official event title and shall permit use of spon- sorship signage, product replicas and other props to iden- tify tournament sponsors on the beach. 16) The CITY shall be notified no later than May 15, 1984, of any co-sponsors supporting the Tournament. Each co-sponsor shall pay to CITY a fee of $100. 17) CITY shall provide a tournament director and eight volley- ball courts with nets, suitable for tournament competition. guapTsaad aoTA '{TTM *V pTAPQ agpp �q DNI ' SIdSON0O ZNHAH ao,�PW 'gosgnag YiaPO aTgpaOUGH aqg agpp �q HDVH9 VSOW23SH aO AZIO SHZ UO3 QSZdHOOV •AZIO aqg �q paTjToads SUOTgPOOT gp buTgsod jog guana aqg aOJ subTs TPUOTgoaaTp aonpoad osTP TTPgs OS •,�gTOTTgnd pup buTSTgaanpP guana-aad LIT UolgUUIaOJUT aTggngs pup buTNapd apnTouT TTPgs OS •OS og gsoo ou gp 'guauipuanog aqg og aoTAaas snq aTggngs abupaap pup gOPag PsoulaaH punoaP saTgTTTOPJ bUTNjpd abupaap og gaogja gsaq sgT aNPUI TTPgs 7,ZIO (TZ 'ZZ �Tnr pup TZ ITnr uo •u" P OO:L aao;aq gopaq aqg TOAOT og Sagopag go guaulgapdao i�gunoO saTabuV sOZ aqg gsonbaa TTPgs 2=0 (OZ •saTgTATgoP buTpapnbagTT apadulT you TTPgs pup aaTd agg go apTs ggnos aqg gP OOPTd axpg TTPgs uoTgTgaduloo pTPS •TPAoaddp jog guaulgapdGC saoanosad �gTunurmoO s , 7,1IO og paggTulqns aq TTTM uOTgTgaduloo �gnpoq buTggpq aqg buTbPgs 109 SOUTTapTnb pup saanp000ad •guaulPuanog TTpq,�aTTOA aqg g4TM UOTgounCuoo uT 'TZ �Tnr ''w'd OO:T gp buTuuTbaq 'anoq auo jog uoTgTgaduioo z�gnpaq buTggpq TPUOTbaa P 90 buTbPgs aqg gTulaad TTPgs 2=0 (6T •guaAa agg buTpaoaad SNaaM oMg JO pOTaad aqg jog 'SUOTgPOOT paaabP �TTpngnw gP 'guawpuanog aqg buTounouuE saauupq guana oMg aopTd og sgdaouoO guaAa gTUlaad TTPgs 2�ZIO (8T February 7, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of February 14, 1984 MEN'S OPEN SUMMER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT SPONSORSHIP CONTRACT Recommendation It is recommended that Your Honorable Body approve the attached contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and Event Concepts for joint sponsorship of the Men's Open Volleyball Tournament, July 21 and 22, 1984, as recommended by Staff and the Community Resources Commission. Background Event Concepts sponsored this Tournament last year, July, 1983. At that time, the City received total revenue of $2,792.50. Expenses for the tournament were $1,340.10. The net gain from that tournament was $1,452.40. Analysis The tournament of 1983 was very successful. However, one area of possible potential trouble is the blatant violation of drink- ing on the beach. As we are aware, the drinking will never stop even if another sponsor is found. However, staff feels it can be controlled and monitored more closely. Measures have been taken to mitigate this problem as much as possible. Event Concepts will have a security force of no less than eight people at any one time for crowd control and to quietly inform individuals of the open container ordinance. This is done at the Cuervo Tournament in Redondo Beach and has worked out very well. As a follow up to last year's tournament, staff solicited evalu- ations from elected officials, Department Heads, and various merchants in the City. The overwhelming response was approval a — ihb,. fh- _ i f•{-..�j 'FSI - __ � - - - -pop�1: �raf OTT - tp 3 PIN.; •� (.P Y .- .._ ��{-'�;` ��, J3.`��� :�F_ ���4a!r� s'r���3 i-� - .- - ��"i _aF'� P���•. ;?�� Iti`��'•. • F 5P _. +KS_ ! �E•, }.`ir? ~ice ,3�$ ._ s ff TIS A =:.r. w #Ise _ Wo iv Oki z� _ TIS 4�Ov ,1 °�a - �I -�- -- �i�Ll.r_ �..;_.-�...iM,v._'a-; _ ._. � �.s. _.JaY��'....:r _....r�....:h •::�;: �a-.l��t_ ,=..-1. �_ _� _I. �:L �4L� -2 - of the tournament. The few negative remarks were the concern for the blatant abuse of drinking on the beach. And as indicated above, we believe we have taken steps to mitigate that for next year's tournament. Also, the Department was approached by a new volleyball organization called The Association of Volleyball Professionals, to sponsor this same tournament. Negotiations with the AVP fell through when that organization withdrew it's proposal in early January. No reason was given for their withdrawal. Respectfully Submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Concur: G egory T. Meyer` City Manager k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 06M 31 32 RESOLUTION NO, N. S. 2508 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARKING OF VEHICLES AT EACH OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF PIER AVENUE FROM VALLEY DRIVE TO PALM DRIVE ON ALTERNATE DAYS DURING THE HOURS FROM 4 A, M, TO 6 A. M, , MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 19-61 (i) Municipal Code, that parking of vehicles at each the north and south curbs on Pier Avenue from Valley Drive to Palm Drive shall be prohibited on alternate days during the hours from 4:00 A. M. to 6:00 A. M. Monday through Saturday; SECTION 2. That the Traffic Engineer is directed to cause to be installed appropriate signs designating said prohibition. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, which shall become effective when and as said signs are posted. ATTEST; APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of January 1964, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Calif. Y CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY J