Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/07/70--w- CIT.Y OF HERiviosA Bakcii ZALIFO.RN'TA. 902-5ev AGENDA CITY COUNCIL E.`,ETING -- Tuesday, April 7, 1970 Council Chamber City Hall - Civic Center joint Meeting with Improven. PLEDGE OF ALUM -LANCE Regular Meeting - 7:30 pm INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March 17, 1970. ANNUAL BEAUTIFICATION AWARDS - YOUTH GROUP PROJECTS: Circle K , Key Club, El Camino College; Chi Gamma Iota, El Camino College; Girl Scout Troop *474; Camp Fire Girls. PROCLAMATION - May, 1970, Senior oitizens Month. 1. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO, N, S15.4 Section 801, "Limitations on Permitted Uses in C-1, C-2.and C-3 Zones" - • Planning Commission Resolution PC, 154-768, adopted March 2, 1970. • 2. CITY COUNCIL - Non -Agenda. Items and Reports: OPERATION SHOEBOX. - Possible Status Report - Councilman Valentine. 3. COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES: (a) Youth Adqsosy Coupon - Proposed Prospectus. O) Imrovement pommi§sion - Vacant Seat - Unexpired term, to December 31, 1973. 4. OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS: (a) DigributiOn of Gas Tax Funds SB 38 - Letter dated March 11 1970, from Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles; Telegram dated March 25, 1970, from State Senator Lawrence E. Walsh. (b) Coastal Bik,ericIsj....1....msiaLarSal:ch 22, 1970 - Letter of appreciation from Los Angeles City Councilman Marvin Braude, dated March 26, 1970. (c) ABC - Reb&s7 PaclflcCoajJJhaL- Certificate of Decision, dated March 26, 1970, from Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State of Cai1fornta 5. COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC: (a) Etauest for Refund from Hprrnosa Thea.tre - Postcards dated March 26, 1970, from Miss Ann Christensen, 845 - 12th Court, Manhattan Beach, and Miss Deborah Morris, 2213 Crest Drive, Manhattan Beach. (b) TrafficCong.91 -Mortterey Boulevayd at60 and 8tb Streels - Letter of appreciation dated March 18, 1970, :from Mrs. Robert Hansford, 628 Monterey Boulevard. ' 4 - 3 City Council Agenda. - April 7, 1970 5. Communications from Public (Continued): (c) Service -Le of appreciation, dated March 23, 1970, from Mr. Jon. W. Myers, 213 Rosecrans Place, Manhattan each. 1,1114 -2- (d) Hermosa Bowl Area - Letter from Mrs. Gordon Evans, Civic Beautification Chairman, Hermosa Garden Club, dated March 25, 1970. (e). Customer Pelting Problem - Letter dated April 2, 1970„ from Mr. Paul Matthies, Hermosa Swim/Gym, 939 Pier Avenue. Staff Report to come. (f) ras_s_alkIllm_Armat - Telegram dated April 1, 1970,. from( Mr. William A . Cloud, 531 Pier Avenue. /1,1,16/41 6. NON -AGENDA ITEMS FROM AUDIENCE - Fifteen. Minute Discu.ssion Period. . . • 7. ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE - 8 STRAND - Accounting of COSI; - Proposed Resolution,„ Confirming Report of Chief Building Inspector. 8. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF FEE -Application for Variance •^. Douglas J. Sniffeni: 6621/2 Longfellow Avenue. 9. BEACH DEVELOPMENT MATTER$ (a) Proposed Beach Development Plan Prospectus. (b) Proposed Lifeguard Headquarters - Plan Approval.. (c) Provision for Public,Restrooma - Transmittal of letter from Dr. C. A. Heldbreder, County Health Officer. 10. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - COUNTY STORM DRAIN PROJECT - HUD -3 - Redondo Beach Project. 11. Fin DEPARTMENT TRAINING - Joint Powers Agreement, City of Inglewood. 12. COMPLAINT - Alice Hunter -• Damages and Personal Injuries - Lester B. ICenoff, Attorney at Law, 900 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles. 13. REFUSE CONTRACT - Status Report from City Manager. 14. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COCKTAIL BAR, 1133-1137 PIER AVENUE - CONNORS Proposed resolution denying permit - Continued from March 17, 1970. 15. ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA - ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 380 - Introduced March 17, 1970 - For adoption. City Council Agenda - April 7, 1970 -3- 16. ZONE CHANGE - ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 381 - East side of Hermosa Avenue, between 14th Street and 16th Street - Introduced March 17, 1970 - For adoption. 17. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 154 - Proposed Resolution of Intention initiating amendments to Articles 14 and 15 regarding findings and decisions of City Council necessary to carry out general purpose of Zoning Ordinance. 18. CITY CLERK MATTERS: (u) General Municipal Election - co mputer.Batiot Processing. (b) General Municipal Election .7 Appointment of Boards. (0) City Clerks Conference - May 17-21, 1970. 19. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS: (a Resort Area Parking - Proposed amendment, overtime parking fines. (b) Bicycles on Strand - Status report regarding proposed amendment. 20. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS - City Manager: (a) Capital Improvement Projects - Status Report. (b) Proposed Land Trade Transaction. (c) Tennis Court Lighting - Status Report. ) • -focle•-•4-rt,„,,..- 21. DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. ADJOURNMENT 1 2 .3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 .8. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. N. S . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING OOMMISSION AS CONTAINED IN ITS RESOLTJTION P.C. 154-736, AND ACCORDINGLY DENYING APPLICATION OF DAVID D. AND ELEANOR C. CONNORS FOR A CONDITIONAL Us PERMIT FOR A COCKTAIL BAR ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1133-1137 PIER AVENUE., FOLLOWING RECONSIDERATION OF ITS ACTION TO DENY, TAKEN ON SEPTEMBER 1. 1969, AS COMMANDED BY JUDGMENT OF SUPERIOR COURT. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after hearings duly and regularly held as provided by law, did in Resolution P.C. 154-736, dated July 21, 1969, deny the request of David D. and Eleanor C. Connors for a Conditional Use Permit filed under the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended, to sell alcoholic b verages on property located at 1133-1137 Pier Avenue; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms and provisions of zoning ordinance, David D. and Eleanor C. Connors havetaken their appeal from the determination and action of the Planning Co nrtie*Aon as set forth in its said resolution to the City Council, and the Council after public hearing acted to concur with the findings and determinations of the City Planning Commission; and WHERE, the applicants did then appear le, fore the Superior Court of the State of California as Petitioners vs. the City of H=rmosa Beach, its City Council and the individual member's thereof, and the Planning Cornrission and the individual members th reap, Respondents, and proceedings were remanded to Respondent with command to set aside its decision dated September 2, 1969 to deny said Conditional Use Permit and to reconsider its action in the light of the Court's Findings of .Fact and Conclusions of Law; and WHEREAS, public hearing concerning. this matter was set in City Council Chamber on the 3rd day of March, 1970, and the appellants, David D. and Eleanor C. Connors, being present and represented by Counsel Walter N. Anderson, and oral and documentary evidence leaving been presented and each member of the City Council having before him those documents referred to in the judgment and set out above in addition to other documents, all of which are sept forth in that certain document entitled "Connors File" and duly filed with the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, and #t being dete 'mined that no further 2i 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 evidence was desired to he presented by the Appellant and the Council beang fully informed on all matters and the public hearing closed, the City Council did unanimously direct the City Attorney to prepare a formal resolution setting forth the findings of the City Council and further to set forth in said formal resolution that the recommendation of the Planning Commission was upheld and the appeal was denied. On the 17th day of March, 1970, said formal resolution was presented to the City Council, whereupon Mr. Anderson, Counsel for the Appellant, objected that th formal resolution did not courately set forth the findings of the City Council, and further at that time Councilman Belasco stated that he had reconsidered .th matter and et the time of the vote on said formal resolution did intend to oast his vote in favor of the appellant and Was then joirnA in this opinion by Councilman Valentine, • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOE HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That after .setting aside its decision of September 2, 1969, the following members of the City Council, based upon the evidence presented to each member, do find as follows: Mayor Thelen and Councilm;i:n Wise do find,' (a) that This type of establish ment is not suitable in this location t this time; (b) that the proposed cocktail lounge is adjacent to existing family residences; (c) that then, is a church in cosE vicinity; (d) that there is a school in clos vicinity; (d) that elementary school children use Prospect Avenue as a y.14,1king route; 03 that the premises are located within the immediate vicinity of a family billiard parlor whose main customers are young people as well as families, and in which location the serving of alcoholic beverages is prohibited; (g) the,t tha conclusibn of the Chief of Police is concurred in, in that this .use.would not loe of benefit.to the welfare or morals of this community; and (h) that -the appa,1 should be denied; Councilman Valdes finds, (a) that there will be a Significant increase in 111 the volume of persons and vehicle traffic which will cause a detriment in the 2 .3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 33. 32 area; (b) that the proposed use is co ,trery to the General Plan, and (c) that the appeal should be denied; and Councilman Belasca and Councilman Valentin = find•, (a) that there is not sufficient grounds to prohibit the use at this time, and O) that the appeal should be granted. SECTION 2. That s id application by David D. and Eleanor C. Connors for a Conditional Use Permit to engage in the sale of alcoholic beverages on property located at 1133-1137 Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach is hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY JOINT MEETING - City Council and Improvement Commission Tuesday, April 7, 1970 _ 6:30 p.m. Council Chamber - City Heli - Civic Center ITEMS FOR INFORMAL DISCUSSION - Suggested by Improvement Commission Chairman Kathy Bergstrom: 1. Review of operation as Commission. 2. How can the Commission serve the City Council and the community most effectively? 3. How individual Councilmen view the role of the Commission. 4. What contributions have been made by this Commission. 5. Evaluate past year's activity. fe- OR...DINANCE NO „ N,, S„ AN ORDINANCE Or THE CITY OF HERMOSA. BEACI--1, CALIFOUla, AMENDDIGZONG ORDINANCE NOGN S„ 154 „ AMENDED, TSV.' DELETING SECTION 801 AND REPH,A,CMG IT wm A REWSED•SECTION 801 -"LIMITATXONS ON PERMITTED USE IN C1,-1, C-2 AND C-3 ZONES". WHEREAS, pursuant to the recoramendations of the City Nanning Commis S .i.0 of the City of Hermosa Bach, duly al atdE,1, after public hearings hold on February 16, 1970 and March 2, 1970, as provided for by Article 15 of Zoning Otdinance No. N. S. /54 of said City, adopted rune 19, .1956, as amended, It is the finding -.)f the, City Council, after study and review of, the findings and determinatiOns set forth in, Planning Commission Resolution 1.?r,„C. 1547768, adopted March 2,' 1970, that the endments to sa§,c1 ordinance as recomrrAdecl in said resolution. &WO necessary for the public peace, health and safety and na best serve the public interest, Now, THErapoRE, THE CITY COUNCIL. OF ':EHE crrv' Or. HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN PS FOLLOW'S° SECTION 1-. That Section 801 of Astiole 8, "Commercial Zones" , of Zoning Ordinance No. NG S. 154, as amended, Is hereby deleted and rep16011d wth a revised Section 001, to read as follows° "Section 801. Li Et). ta Lions on PermIttsKi Uses in C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zones. "(A) Every use permitted in C-1,„' C-2 and C3 Zones shall be subject to the following conditions and Iiraitations (1). AU uses in said 1,Fones shall be conducted 6holly• within a building„, :Exceptions may h* allowed in the following uses,. at the discre,tion • of the Plannina Coma-Asp:don, ;7 ub ject to the pr;,:.}zec.luisits.: of a Conditional Use Pezinit o be processed in the mann,er• specified in krticle 14, Section 1400 et S eq, „ of this orthnance° (a) Drive-in or walk-in FOG ta. urant,s , Gasoline stations cc) Sales of new and LI sad antotaol-,,,,112se txuoksi: imilers, boats, motorcycles and bicycles. WI Car washes. (rnechardc al or harkc opezatecl Ce Electrical transformer s u.•bs tlons 0 (f) Horticulxel nirseries (g) Other similar enterpriees which in the opinion of the Nanning Commission are of such nature that it would be impractical for them Lo be conducted wholly within a building. (2) The manufacture„ assembly or processing of only those products made incident to a permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 Zones may be Permitted, subject to the following requirements, conditions and limitations° (a) Conditional Use Permit required. (b) Shall be sold only at retail on the premises.. (c) Not more than five (5) persons may be employed in such manufacturing, assembly or processing of product. (3) Storage, other then "storage warehouse.. shall be limited to accessory storage of co Chlinodities sold at retail on the premises. (4) No establishment for the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption u.pon the premises a,t which said alcoholic beverage is sold shall be permitted without first there having been filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit a.nd said Conditional Use.Permit having been granted and effective. Exception°, Any establishment for the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption upon the premises at which • said alcoholic beverage is sold when located in a C-3 General and Highway Commercial District which is located more than one .hundred (100)) feet at the closest point, measured radially from the exterior boundaries of the lot or parcel of land on V/htch said establishment is located, from an "R" Residential Zone property shall not be required to secure a Conditional Use Permit. Any establishment providing entertainment separate or in conjunction with another permitted use as entertainment is defined in Section 17-19, Classification 93", Group 12 of Article 17, "Licenses", of the City Code of this City, including, but not limited to, the showing of motion pictures, presentation of vaudeville shows, dancing including - customer dancing, shall be allowed in the C-2 and C-3 Zones only, provided there has first been filed an application for a Conditional (5) • Use Permit and said Permit has been granted and is effective. Exceptions: (a) Any establishment located in a C-3 Genera and Highway Commercial Zone which is located more than one hundred (100) feet at the closest point, measured radially from the exterior boundaries of the lot or parcel of land on which said establishment is located, from an "R" Residential Zoned property. (b) Upon approval of a permit by the City Council, as provided for in Section 17-29 of Article 17 of the City Code, the provision:of up to three (3) musicians playing, instruments not electronically amplified or - ugmented in any way may be permitted in a restaurant or cocktail lounge. (c) Presentation of a special performance or performances sponsored by merchants licensed to do business in the City, or by bona fide citizens' groups or cub, for benefit purposes upon approval of a permit as provided for in Section 17-28 of Article 17 of the City Code. (d) Shows of works of art at, or by, an established gallery or sch.00l licensed within the City. (B) Factors of Consideration, In considering the granting of a Conditional Use Permit for any establishment listed in this seo.tion„ the Planning Commission shall„ in addition to the factors of consideration listed in. Airticle 10, Section 1000 of this ordinance, consider the following: (1) Its distance from existing residential uses within the zone and its distance from residential and non-commercial uses in zones adjacent to that zone in whicli the establishment is proposed, (2) The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking facilities, and their distance from the proposed establishment:. -3- • • (3) Location of and distaricie to chuxch.es, schools, hospitals and public playgrounds in relation to the proposed establishment. .(4) Hours of operation of the proposed establishment. (5) The combination of uses proposed within the proposed establishment. (6 Precautions taken by the owner or opera.tor of the proposed establishment to assure the compatibility of the use with surrounding areas. (7) The relation•of the proposed business to traffic volume and the size of streets servicing the area; routes of ingress and egress and their potential effect upon street and pedestrian tTaffic. (8) The proposed exterior signs and decor of the proposed establishment which are planned to advertise the activity, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. (9) The number of similar establishments or uses within close proximity to the proposed establishment. (10) Stich other considerationsas, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure that the purpose and intent of this provision are upheld. (C) Nonconformance of Existing Uses -. Limitation to Conditional Use Permits. (1) All existing uses of establishments for which there exists no valid Conditional Use Permit as provided for in subsection 801(A) above are hereby declared nonconforming uses and are governed by all applicable provisions of Article 13 of this ordinance. (a} 0)) Any Conditional Use Permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this section shall terminate and cease to apply to any establishment or use which has been vacated or discontinued for ninety (90) days or more. If such nonconforming establishment or use is vacated or discontinued for ninety (90) or more calendar days, any future use which requires a Conditional Use Permit as provided for under this section shall require a new Conditional Use Permit to be processed in the manner specified in Iiirticle 14 of this -.4- • • ordinance and which has been granted and is effective, prior to reinstating said nonconforming use. (2) To accomplish the purpose and intent of this ordinance, all existing uses of establishments for the purpose of sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption upon the premises for which there exists no valid Conciitional Use Permit as provided for in paragmph (A)(4) of this section are declared nonconforming uses and are governed by all applicable provisions of this ordinance, as amended, relating to nonconforming uses and Conditional Use Permits., (3) The provisions ofthis subsection shall apply only to such existing or proposed estabilOunents for which there is filed with the State of California, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, an application or requested transaction whereby the laws of the State of California require notice thereof to be filed with the City and allow for the filing of a protest thereon by the City (except for person to person tra.nsfers of existing licenses, except as otherwise provided herein), and/or to such existing establishments when they have ceased their operations for a period of ninety (9O or more calendar days and thereafter there is filed any application or requested transaction with the State of California, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, whereby the laws of the State of CaDB-Arnie require notice thereof to be filed with the City and allow the filing of a protest thereon by the City (including person to person transfer of existing licenses)." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion Of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, sub- sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or u.riconstittitionai. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30} days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days fi!orri the passage thereof, the City Clerk shall have this ordinance published at least once in the Hermosa Beach Review, , a weekly nevispaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST. MAZIlletiarY.G.......1•11.161.:.-,,....•...enryi•Val.41•71,.... PRES)DF,NT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORK; Cl2Y ATTORNEY RESOLUTION PC0 154-768 A RESOLUTION R. COM E'.eS DI N AMENDMENT NT° TO ORDINANCE Li.Sa 154, ARTICLE& SECTION 8O: RELATING TO LIMITATIONS O14 COMMERCIAL USES IN THE C-2 AMS 0-3 ZONES OD ADDING THERETO . A REQUIREMENT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ENTERTAINMENT. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of Harmosa Boaohp at public hearings helr? Febit4atY 16th, and March 2 . 1970p considered the proposed arrandment; and WHEREAS, ssyaid as ndmsnt modifies *xis ging r ; ,ulat one to the oztont oa.t of deleting certain duplicate subooctionsp and procedural subse tiooe which aro nsa ;r in he opinion of the Planning COMMiRrA0211) necessary to aohiow the purpose of Seg ti ora 801; and IbHEREASS tho Cit, ' Council has enacted, an Urgvncy Onlinanoo qui.rina° a aesnr;?i.tio ,s.t Use Permit ait :g'o° entertainment; and . WEER A s the proposed ;w4inansto would roplao s amid iia ge oy sra.inanoep and in the opinion of the Planning Commission is necessary to protect the Raga sthp safety and g a.E ce xal welfare NOWTHEREPORE BE IT RESOLVED thra the City Planning Commission of Hermosa Rech hereby app me the attached ordinance labelled "AN ORDINANCE OF TEE CITE' OF k BEAM, LI RNIA D AMENDING ZONING IHG ORDI TA eC ; I Ov, i 0S0 154p AS AMENDED, BY DELETING AND REPLACING SECTION &)i .°LI tIPATI0NS ON PERMITTED USES IN C-2 AND C.3 ZOBES"5, and recommends same to the City Council of H s aaa;a Beach fog- a optiob 4 ATESt Como Mulfi ,go s; Stabler Wattere Chairman Roble EOES: None ABSEN c C mc. Collis �: e�, • CERTIFICATION I hereby A,ertify that the foregoing Raspsluti.o. P:C 154-q68 was adopted by the Planning C misoion of the City of l t abs 2asa ea h at a regular meeting heed too 7n Merchp 1970. DATE �-yy�s•-•••••��.. YL��:i.arhH%'f.�esfT4[rcf:mh'aL—wY3.�rtrtT.:K�S9t11e�L+ '.AMES Dc COLE Sp Secretary RESOLUTION A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach estab- lishing a Youth Advisory Council and providing rules and regulations for the government thereof: WHE2EASD the City Council of Hermosa Beach agrees that our community has no greater asset than its young people - and it will not be too many years before these young people assume the full responsibilities of leadership. WHEREASD the problems_of todays youth are more urgent than ever before - a fact most visible to parents and city officials. 4HEAEAS9 city officials are encouraging youth of this community to become involved in the development and coordination of programs and problem,solving of youth activities. NO' 1D THEREVORED LET IT BE RESOLVED2 that the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby create a Youth Advisory Council to assist the City in developing • programs for the youth of the community$ and for the Parks and Recreation Department to provide professional guidance services for the .Youth Advisory Council. • • The. purposs-of a Yclal;.h Concil ere the a city to :',7ep to special neods znel oontribu,t-ir.)ns Of its vc,u..n!..4:.citinens,„ (2) young people topar,tici.pate in. the proos.,nes of . ma.ke possble a greats uzation of ^3:he• and idealim of yoQng p2rsons th of th,77.:: More the pl..1:,...Tos,F7.7,• to give to the• City Council•on -.T.iiLtte,.•:,,.rs. of oc:.,ncey:'n to yoong hi.J.t not lim:ited to;:, The school dropout prolllem Em2loyment youth Problems related to drugs narc..•otic. x!„.eeds of, youth Oppor.z7.un.itles for young per,sons Specia2 problrims c,f city SECTIOA HERMOSA, BEACE vOUTH ,ffWISCRY COUBCM Thare is heretv th& Youth AO.,;..TisorY Couni:t, which -shL11 as- advisory c?ommttee for .ths. City Council c,f. City ok Herpsa . and shli hav,?:, only •thse :?wers givea by the C•ity Counoil • :i:7,soluti.on or by subsec;Jent Lotion. of the City SECTIO.1.411 MEMBERSHIP This Cou.neil consi-st of 1ibere who will serve s.A.: of the City Council for term of one (1) mGmbe's:, yiv• nted for a suocesie tezu or terms by City Coni7'.icil, embership shall he rep2:asentative of thc, groups a. the. foT":„oing •fashon Term of office will begin aanpiarylo and end December. 31 of each yearr, Redondo 0nion '2 Th • 2 meabers 'Jura Costa High 2 membes ecific Shores High Sohool 2 •membes Piev Ave,, School •2 n - : El Camiho College 2 membez,s W ) 2 memhevs .'ontgomery. At -.7.,,arpe 2 mamba:os SECTION III CHAWAN The ChaiDman shall. preside at- all meetings of the Council, • thc,„ the Charman is the Council shallapnoin.;,-: Chaiman Pro Tem for the clonduct of the business•of meetinv-, The Chairman shal71 selected by the Coftcil from the aformsntioned•memher,ship:,• The Chairmn shill •ootivme in officeux';til the City Couri,.ai.2. directs othorwi.,:, sa.11•serve .i,,,4s•Chairy.•.,fn for the t,.eiod of one yearD ;,,Jubjct renewed• by the City -Council if it shoold deem tha SECTION IV POWERS The powers of the Youth Council are hereby specifically to assist and advise the City Council in respect to all matters pertaining to youth, youth programming, youth planning, youth faoilities, and available youth recreational facilities, pertaining in particular to youth and teenagers. The Council shall seek expert opinions, gather factual information, and analyze the same; hold meetings and hearings and explore all possibilities and means by which the City can cooperate with various agencies in solving problems pertaining to Hermosa Beach youth and teen- agers. The Council shall from time to time make recommendations to the City Council concerning the results and their studies and findings. The Council has no power to take any final action toward the solution of the foregoing problems without the approval of the City Council, The Council is also directed to report at least once each quarter to the City Council in writing, such report containing the results or recommendations accomplished up to that time. SECTION V SECRETARY The Chairman shall designate one of the members of the Youth Council as Secretary. The Secretary shall be responsible for the minutes of all meetings of the Council and shall perform such other functions as directed by the Chairman. Additional secretarial and clerical help may be supplied the Council as directed by the City Staff. SECTION VI RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF MEETINGS Rule 1: Roberts" Rules of Order, Revised, shall govern all meetings of waci..2sx==aca — -- this council. Rule 2: ' Meetinajm_and Place. The meetings of the Council shall be on the fourth Tiarda-sr—o-f each month. The meeting place shall be the Hermosa Beach Recreation & Parks Department Administration Building. Rule 3: 91vmat. A majority of the Council's members constitutes a quorum to transact business. Less than a majority mayadjoru-s anyameeting. Rule 4: Order of Business. The order of business of the Council shiil sg-irirmnawg177-- (a) Roll Call (b) Reading, correcting, and approving minutes of previcus meeting (c) Oral or written communications or petitions received (d) Requested reports of City or other pub/ie official (e) Unfinished business (f) New business (g) Adoption of agenda for following meeting (h) Adjournment Rule 5: 414.941. The Secretary shall prepare the agenda under the super- irision and direction of the Chairman assisted by a staff repre- sentative of the Hermosa Beach Parks and Recreation Department.. The agenda for any meeting shall be made available in the office • of the City Clerk at least 24 hours prior Co said meeting, and shall be delivered to or deposited in the mail addressed to each member of said council at least 24 hours prior to said meeting. The requirements of this section may be waived in any meeting where all Council members present give their written consent to the Council at the time the meeting is called to orders or in the alternative there is entered in the minutes of said meeting the entry that all Council members are present and have waived said notice. In either event the waiver shall contain a statement of the subject matter of said meeting and no other subjects may be discussed at said meeting. Aule 6 Public Meetin•e. All meetings of the Council shall be open to the pu Aiiy person not a member of the Council shall be entitled to appear before said Concil at any meeting and to speak for not more than five minutes on any subject presented on the agenda for said meeting, provided said person, prior to the opening of said meeitng, requests the Secretary for an opportunity to be heard on a given subject. The Chairman shall have the power to terminate any public discussion at any time in his discretion. All persons appearing before the Council shall state their name and address before presenting their discussion. SECTION VII MINUTES The Secretary shall be responsible for the minutes of all meetings of the Council. The minutes shall set forth the names of the members present at said meeting. In addition, the minutes shall contain any other information required by this resolution. The minutes shall contain a concise statement of appearances before the Council and a summary of the business conducted by the Council. A copy of said minutes shall be made available in the office of the City Clerk following said meeting and a copy of said minutes shall be delivered to each member of the Council and to the City Manager not less than one week prior to the next succeeding meeting. SECTION VIII MOTIONS, ORDERS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS The minutes shall contain in full all motions, orders, and recommendations, of the Council. In addition, the Chairman may order the Secretary to cause to be prepared and delivered excerpts of said minutes in respect to motions, orders, and recommendations to the City Clerk, the City Manager, or the City Council. SECTION IX ADVISORY CAPACITY The function and the power of this Council shall be one of study and advisory capacity to the City Council. The Council shall have no power to take any final orconclusave action on the part of said City or said Council, nor shall the Council have any power to make any statement or to take any action that would indicate a binding decision on the part of said Council or said City. All recommendations shall be addressed to the City Council. All reports and recommendations to the City Council shall contain a concise and comprehensive summary of the study made by said Council, the findings of the Council, and the appearances, statements, and/or recommen- dations made to the Council, and the conclusions of the Council. .h� SECTION X YOUTH COUNCIL STATUS This Youth Council is a special committee of citizens, formed by the City Council to assist them in analyzing youth and related programs and problems. This. Council is not, and shall not be deemed to be, an official commission of the City of Hermosa Beach. The members of this committee shall not be deemed to be City officers or officials and the City shall not assume any responsibility or liability for the acts of said committee. The members of this committee shall serve without compensation or reward or a right to renumberation for expenses incurred unless the City Council has previously, by order, authorized said expenditure. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1970 PROSPECTIVE CITE' CQMMISrS�� March 31, 1970 Hermosa B :.. ch Improvement Commission: Rob rt J. Vitale 1212 24th Street 374-0751 Ros =mary Foreman 38 - 14th Street 372-2155 Frank Procz 925 Montgomery .D riv 376-9534 Glen A. Emigh 1069 - 10th Street 372-7855 J. Mike Foote 2021 Monterey Boulevard 372-3613 Fred Reese, Jr. 621 Bay View Drive 376-9231 Joe Clinton 2475 Si1verstrend Avenue 3794572 Eric Herman 1600 Monterey Boulevard 372-4595 Harold .Robert 2014 Hillcrest Drive 374-2093 Janet Faye Walkr 429 - 31st Street 379-4773 Katie Arnier 13 -- 18th Stre<t 372-4655 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD BOARD OF SUPERVISOR S COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 383 HALL OF ADMINISTRATION / LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 JAMES S. MIZE, EXECUTIVE OFFICER Each City in the County of Los Angeles Gentlemen: At its meeting held March 10, 1970, on motion of Super- visor Frank G. Bonelli, the Board of Supervisors went on record as vigorously opposing State Senate Bill ,38 which would give the authority for allocation of gasoline tax money to the State Highway Commission instead of using the Mayo -Breed formula of 55-45, or the new formula of 60- 40 which, until the Senate Transportation Committee's action of March 9, appeared possible to achieve. The Board further requested that each City in the County of_, Los Angeles adopt a resolution opposing this•Bill and for- ward copies to the State Legislators. FRANK G. BONELLI KENNETH HAHN ERNEST E.OEBS. BURTON W. CHACE WARREN M.DORN 195 i------ LA414M.i236: i. DWY030 DWZ1 DWZ1 NL PDF=DOWNEY CALIF `24w MR WESLEY C MI RANI ELS CITY MANAGER*4 i TY HALL HERMOSA BEACH CALIF= JRGENT ' THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERI I SDRS HAS REQUESTED THAT EACH CITY `I N THE COUNTY GO `ON RECORD AS l OPPOSING ,SB 38 (WALSH--CARRELL ACT), WHICH ;IN 'ITSPRESENT FORM GI VES THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION THE AUTHOR`i TY TO DETERMINE NE DISTRIBUTION OF GAS TAX FUNDS. THIS `I S THE ONLY LEGISLATION, SINCE THE I NCEPTI ON OF THE NORTH=.SOUTN SPLIT (23 YEARS AGO) TO GET OUT OF THE NORTHERN DOMINATED 'SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMI TTEE, THAT 'CAN AND WILL BE AMENDED ON THE SENATE FLOOR* AMENDMENTS HAVE LONG BEEN PREPARED TO DELETE THE HI GHWAY COMMI SSI ON AS THE AGENCY i. TO ALLOCATE THESE FUNDS AND PROVIDES THE RATION SHALL. BE 60 PERCENT TO THE SOUTH AND 40 PERCENT TO THE NORTH. 14, F EEL CERTAIN THE BILL' 'I N 1 TS AMENDED FORM WILL HAVE YOUR CULL: SUPPORT AND REQUEST THAT YOU DELAY ANY EXPRESSION OF OPPOSITION TO THIS S MEASURE UNTIL I HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNI TY TO INSURE ITS PASSAGE WITH THE NECESSARY 21 MAIIViN B AUD! COUNCILMAN ELEVENTH DISTRICT Ogutril of tile Qffite Us tie luit March 26, 1910 Hon. Quentin Thelon Mayor City of Her osBeach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mayor Thal n: COMMITTEES FINANCE. CHAIRMAN M ANNINO OTATE COUNTY ANO FEDERAL APFAMIS TELEPHONE 6216.6$11, VIET 2011 ' Our Sunday bikoride w t very s thly the to the help y,s,ur police depar } I,: nt gt v :: us in providing accompaniment for that portion of c. r rid :.> in your city. The group of h}rdy and rienced ©ycl .r numbered abut 150 all of whom are gager to .:I;ork with ca us to rds the goal of a coastal, bi.;u , . 1the Please relay .o y thanks to. your police officers who helped to ick : our trip too pleas nt and safe. MB:cr/ b S5 rely brav p1SEAL ,1 AL � Councilcan„ lab District.... STATE OF. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL CERTIFICATE OF DECISION File 39961 Reg. 1742 It is hereby certified that the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, having reviewed the findings of fact, determination of issues and recommendation in the attached proposed decision submitted by a Hearing Officer of the Office of Administrative .Procedure,, adopted said proposed decision as its decision in the case therein described on 1lnreh 26, 1970. Sacramento, California Dated: Mirth 26,;1970 ABC -127 (1-69) Derothi norm' ear ng an ga STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL 175 Folios IN THE MATTER OF THE Protest of City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach By: Wesley C. McDaniel City Manager, Civic Center, Hermosa Beach against the transfer of a conditional on -sale beer and license to: wine Robert C. Aurentz and Clyde P. Redfern Rebo's 719 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 1 hereby certify that the following constitutes my proposed decision in the above -entitled matter as a result of the hearing held before me at the above time and place, after due notice thereof having been given according to low, and 1 hereby recommend its adoption as the decision of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. • File 39961 Reg. 1742 :. Time of Hearing: 3-10-70 9:30 a.m. Place of Hearing: City Council Chambers Hermosa Beach Licenses: 42 Reporter: Mary Davie Appearances: For Dept: For Prot: For Appl: OLA 22734 Frank Britt Assoc. Counsel J. W. Mirassou, City Atty. Robert G. Aurentz & Clyde F. Redfern ISSUES,:; Whether or not the transfer of the license would be contrary. to public welfare and morals by reason of Article XX, Section 22 of the California'' Constitution, so as to warrant the denial thereof pursuant to Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code in that it is alleged: PROPOSED . DECISION 1): Such transfer would create or add to an undue concentration f licensed premises in the area; and, 2) Would create or add to a police problem. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1.. The subject premises, located at the above address, has dimensions of 36 feet by 48 feet, 15 bar stools, 5 tables with 15 or 16 chairs, two pool tables, a shuffle board, a juke box, and is attended by : two barmaids. 2. The location was first licensed with an on -sale beer license in 1958 until the present on -sale beer and wine license was issued to predecessors of the applicants in December of 1964. The subject matter involves a person-to-person transfer. 3. Said applicants originally applied for the transfer of an unconditional license, but on December 11, 1969, they freely and voluntarily applied for a conditional license. These conditions, in general, are that they will not utilize the services of topless, bottomless, scantily clad, nude ornear-nude females either in person or in movies in the premises. 4. The applicants presently operate under a temporary license which wasissued on November 15, 1969. PROPOSED DECISION (Continued) File 39961 Reg. 1742 5. In the City of Hermosa Beach, which covers an area of 1-1/3 square miles and has a population of approximately 18,600 persons, there are now 17 on -sale premises in operation. Of the 17 about 7 are restaurants and many of these premises are located on or near the beach front. These premises are not only patronized by local citizens, but by a large influx of visitors, particularly in the summer season. 6. The operation of an on -sale beer and wine license in the sibject location is not compatible with present municipal planning for the area. 7. The operation of the proposed premises is of concern to the police only insofar as, like other such operations, it requires police surveillance. However, since the premises has been operated by the applicants, it has been upgraded by over 100% from its previous operation and has, in fact, decreased the amount of called -for police services. DETERMINATION'OF ISSUES PRESENTED: Transfer of the license would not add to or create either an undue concentration of licensed premises, nor a police problem.. Such transfer is not contrary to public welfare and morals by reason of Article XX, Section 22 of the California Constitution and the denial thereof is not warranted pursuant to Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code. PENALTY OR RECOMMENDATION: Dated at Los Angeles, California, March 17, 1970. 1'. J. �DOY Office of ng 0 icer inistrative Procedure d.rY' • • COPY POSTCARD: City Council Hermosa Beach, California Gentlemen, Manhattan Beach Mar 26 Last Saturday, March 21, I attended a showing of "Alaskan Safari" at the Hermosa Fox Theatre on Hermosa Avenue. It was represented as a movie for general a udience$, however, I fourld the needless shooting of animals offensive to me. When I requested my money returned the representative of the company showing the movie indignantly refused after we had only viewed 40 minutes. He, however, told us we had viewed an hour, and could not refund our money. leasePtake appropriate action. /s/ Ann Christensen 345 - 12th Court Manhattan Bch Calif 90266 POSTCAFtD: City Council - Hermosa Beach, California Manhattan Beach Mar 26 Gentlemen, On Saturday, March 21, I attended a. misrepresented movie "African Safari" which I found to be a shooting spree instead of a travelog. • I found this movie sickening enough to ask for my money back. •However, the representative for the movie refused to refund my money & told me to look for something else besides the killing of innocent animals, but that was all there was. The movie is rated "G" for general audiences, but the killing should rate this movie an "X". I feel cheated and want my money back. /s/ Deborah Morris 2213 Crest Drive Manhattan Beach, California 90266 • • COPY March 18, 1970 Attn To: The Honorable Mayor, and Members of the City Council Dear Sirs: I would like to express my thanks to all of you for your decision on the traffic control at Monterey Boulevard at 6th and 8th Streets. Please believe that a deep appreciation is felt by all of us in the South School area, because you have shown a regard for our concern for the safety of our children in the community. Although we can try. and teach the children to use safety, and, without sounding too "mushy", it does my heart well to "see " the added safety measures being installed presently that will help to "create" better and safer conditions for them. In my opinion, to Beautify Hermosa Beach does not necessarily mean improvements, but it can also include the elimination of ugliness in hazards, and thanks to you and Mr. Stevens of Public Works, Monterey is "beautiful" because it is now safer for travel. With Heartfelt Appreciation, and Much Thanks , from Is/ Mrs. Robert Hansford 628 Monterey Blvd. H.B. • AX/of e -X./ Lar sir, Last Saturday, March 21, around 2:30 p.m., it was my privilege to • witness one of the H ermosa Beach Lifeguards in action. The individual 23 March 1970 was manning the Longfellow Areet guard tower at t times, and I was • nearby on the beach, watching the people surfing and swimming in the water.' One young man swimming in the surf attracted any attention. No sooner than I realized he was having difficulty, did I also see the lifeguard coming down the beach in his direction. By the tin o the young man made his first call for help, the lifeguard was already in th4rater to render aid. I am happy to report the young man was successfully rescued, owing to the alert vigilance of the lifeguard. This manto action impressed ups me the professional devotion to duty and responsibility required of these men. On behalf of the other public beach users such as.myself, I would like to extend a grateful thanks and congnatulations far a job well don I take comfort knowing that if I ever get in over my head, there is someone nearby who is able to pull me out of the drink. Jon W.'Myers „2/ -5? 762.64„ „S- April. 2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Valley Park Sump Development Gentlemen: As noted in the attached copy of a memorandum from John Stevens, a modified plan for sump development was approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and also transmitted to the City Council, receiving approval by general consent, several months ago. The proposed development included partial filling of the sump so that its depth upon completion of the fill would be approximately half of that now in evidence. Following the filling, the area would be landsceped along its slopes with vari- ous paths and plantings to enhance a nature trail idea, and a small scale im- promptu stage and rustic setting area constructed at one spot in the bottom, with fire rings and possible outdoor sleeping area adjacent. To avoid the necessity of purchasing fill dirt, we have adopted a policy of attempting to solicit fill mateftia tom various public and private excavation projects until the desired level is reached. Since the volume of projects has been slower than anticipated, and, the competition for available dirt is high, the fill has not progressed to.the'point where development may yet occur. It would be our intention to continue the present program as outlined above unless instructed otherwise by the City Council. It should also be mentioned that the Parks and Recreation Commission will be undertaking next year a mas- ter plan for Valley Park, and it is suggested that any considerations involving the sump or other aspects of the park should probably be referred to that Commission. WCM:mm Enclosure Respectfully subm. itted, WESLEY O. MC DANIEL City Manager • • ,!a fr r • t'..•:)•,, • . c3f March 251? 1970 Honorablellayor and City Our members are interested in finding out the stste of progress of the Hyrmosa 66'4,4, 1° area which is included. in the mmster plant° the Theodore Payma Native are kn Eirmoss Valley Park. We are planning additional plAntiA‘ to the native area this menth and ould like to inolud in our planting budget for 1970 in the Fen on the banks of the bowl ,hrea. 'de re enclosing copies o1 interest by the council from yem;s past and it does seem like the.projt“,t in drgthg. rhere had been'some talk during the pt year atkiut e ball playing area and we would like to again say this park Is not athletio park and is for relaxation end piorto M youth groups. It Is a ehnno to have Something unique and . beautiful if this bowl concept oan be carried out. Our members are anYious to help gith this project and wish to thank the Council and the Parks denart- went for all th 000peration we have had. We. will hop,k to have some prooon with this area. Si'toerely, ••0,/,;4c— v Mrs, Gordon Evans Hermosa Garden Club Civic BenutifIcatio* CT April 23$ 069 TO: P `ba c es Recreation Comissioa RoM: John V. Stevemao Director og P4blitig 's Report - Partial Filling og Valley ey Paz FY As revel -Med at ths elon's mooting og fftwet 27thfA office bale investigatedmatter o° o f pir, z $° sl fL1X th the large depression at Vallogy Path, whida -wzm peemlously used ap a ea ; °'se �: for etc= wabu cR i Che t oil his investigation, L' follow ss Re c is �, cdrm i t ? o At tho prew•eat time ,.ate bottom oR Eta scup La ropercntwatmly. 4 foot b low the top of a storm drain a n line Vaidh we momently constructed in the s area and linanatma the nsed:;tha large holding capacity of the u :xe is st= a ill int of surface drainage team they a . ; sd'l area that t reins the sump which creates a 11 pond d ri raiggy periods. The natural drains, ; o2 the area is towana the nfx• smd it L& felt to be ra,„ al to intercept this =tog all avaux s, tbe sump ° s perimeter and digit it elsewhore. The placement of apprazite 61-Ecot fill. =raid =sate a new surface ubidh e tld be graded t , drams properly tato Van existing s to i drain line. This Lill would require " mately 4,000 =talc yards of tlhidh th top le to 24 indhee should .d good qual i y top soil. ';iia fi . , ghomid ppm suet a mann x as to insure proper compaction so that t' e nant uou d not occur nd pos y de gay any familitT or r . t ro uhich might bo placed ac upon the new sur e° The new ares;vAiidh old be created ted b :sial won, tinily an even curf . with a manimum grsdo of 24. wmaid be roughly 200 tmt by 100 feet i dimanSion. The avlin M: surface game would be appromimately 9 feed elow the to she the west bank. terra effect of this operation woad be to erefte a lam flat area at tIvit bottom of the vamp and to wee the o existing depression by mat one-third Respectfully tt$ /5,2,z Tirerseloy, tug. - S i, 196VL. ie About $2.030 bas been allocat- ed gor interim development of the drainage sump area sat Vai- ley Party as picnic camping ground, Hermosa Leh City Mgr. Wes McDa3.nzoi said Wednesday. feso said about $1,900 would be used to 4ee3 the bet a 0 the 11110 t by 254 foot 67al SEfflip with clean nand a !costa fire foo use by picnickers and by youth groups, en evernight i, � eotiter $l,t Wraaa1d to used for improvement smd ex- pansion of tbe• Native Floral {wren, safe, o;md1ng Ott camp, he $ aid. ' The work, McDaniel said, Would be done on aro "available time" basis by city employes. The interhn project should be ;'completed for use before the srarnrner of 1.056, he saki. would entaaa & minimum of ex. , The object of tbe. plan, had said, would be to create az forest setting conducive to a camping atmosphere for chit- drip. Th plan hos been suggested as on immediate rinse of the urea until a definite bug -range plsa has been decided upon. One proposal, McDaniel said, was to use the depression as a dump area fee materials from the demolition of the Hermosa Bfltmofe &'tote!, owned by the city. Another plan, fiwored by Mrs. Frances Young of the Hermosa Garden Club, is con- struction of a multi - purpose howl costing aro estimated X38;. D�. The bowl, with terraced grass • for sets, would include A .pian for interim develop -,a 9,502 pound concert tst • e. gneeat has been proposed to the Works s and Recreation Commis- sion by Park Supervisor Paul Petea^ron. In the center area of the rump he has proposed a figure- eight arrangement of fire ring surrounded by logs for seating. At one end sa natural terrace could he developed into a small stage area of crushed granite, be said. Eneon;pasing this 'tower area would be a series of footpaths •et among tames and serf plant ground co v e r. He ouggested tiaaat this w €a u, l d be an idaeaal gfrojr. t for Boy wets and xmuaZevnv THE ONLY DAILY NEWSPAP THE SOUTHSAY AREA • July II& 19,0 • S Coots Daily.— IP Conks, Sunday a Hermosa 'Bowl' Proposed A proposal for $20,744 multiRnwI. purposeltulra.9„,14gli was presented last night to Hermosa Beach 'eourtellrnen. The proposal, initiated by the Hermosa Garden Cub, was re- ferred "Vi–Cify-Witager Walter Harris for consideration in the eity's budget for .th3 ii e fiscal year. .• • Tire budget uiti 001312. befOre the e01.2eCil within Me next twee . no !i;. Mrs. Franees Young; Irepre-: sentative of the 'garden' club,- told councilmen she felt sueh recreation area was rieeded'..by the community: . She said it 04 be .used fmany Iferznoia react Yon organixatioris, including'the !kr. Scouts and Girl Seitut.5..and 'fdr; graduation exercises...for • mesa's over -crowded* sellools-: The proposed howl, Wit' would he at the former site Af •tHertnoss Valley Par • Street and Gould Lane, w •include a 9,504-square-fo stege. • Gad,, club, theV iflt to •offmals Re. provide ,,Logg 1.ty. Paul Matthies DBA m Hermosa Swim/Gym Hermosa Beach, Calif. April 2, 1970 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach Gentlemen: Regarding the Los Angeles County Funded Impro;gement and Widening Project on Pier Ave., the new proposed plan, at the above address, is to change thexisting t n car parking facility (drive in - back out) to a four car parking area with a 20 ft. ingress - egress. I. complied with the original and existing recommendation of the City Council when I first went into business in 1959. The new proposed parking plan would take away six of my vitally needed parking spaces. In talking with Mr. Bud Trott, Building Department, he had confirmed that the new proposal of limited parking would, indeed, be the basis of a denial of a permit requesting to expand or improve my burin.=ss and property. May I, at this time, bring to your attention, the hardship and inequities the new proposal would be to me end my patrons. In summation, I am requesting the City Council ndorse the original ten spaced parking facility it had recor•..ended in 1959. Res ectfully submitted, Paul Matthies :LA016 SSK `933 L LLEI72 XLT5546 NL PDF -7 EXTRAmTDL HERMOSA BEAC CAL F =THE CITY COUNCIL C1V.9C CENTERm F ER dOSA BEACH CALIF (ROB REQUEST PERMISSION AT NEXT MEETING TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE POLICE HARAMENT AND FALSE ARRESTf W1LLIA A CLOUD SC 31 1 ER AVE t ERMOSA BEAC 4 57'63366a tyr },z APR 2 97O 121 CITY CLERK HERebt P. 0•,RCt.• 1 1633 Ra7mond Ave® Hermosa Beach, Calif. y Marsch 23, 1970 To the airy Council City Hall Hermosa Beach, 'alit. 90254 We have lived here at the Raymond Street address for sixteen years. t'1e have always had congenial neigh- bors . We now have a problem witha neighbors two barking dogs, who awaken us early in the morning, disrupt' n.g our rest, and annoying us 'n the daytime to the extent we cannot relax in our awn home. They are . lef t alone in the yard most of .the time as he fa seldom home. We feel something shor.11d be done about this situation. Th'_• s should be put on the Agenda„ and the City Council enact some sort of ruling to eliminate such a nuisance, to -_elp us and any one else who Might have the same problem in the city. John Masson. Inez ?usw41i Fra 271. COPY Pine 18, 1969 I have lived in Hermosa Beach 19 years. We built the house we are living in at present in 1954. We had never had any problems with our neighbors. Several years ago a Mr. Roma moved in to e house next to our back yard, his address being 824 1/2 - 17th St. Our bedrooms face his back yard. He has had a dog all this time. Last summer his dog had 5 pups and after that I have had a noise problem, which has disturbed my sleep and rest to the point I had to go to the Dr. for medication. When he had all the pups they would cry at night and awaken me. On the first occasion, I called him up when he carne home from work and told him. He got rude with me and hung up. He later talked to my husband., My husband explained the problem and they seemed to want to coopeeate to correct the situation. .In the meantime, they continued to awaken me early in the morning. I didn't call the police, because I thought we could work this out between us. Then he got rid of . some of• the pupa, keeping 2. Even after I Warned him of the disturbance, he continued to put the pups on his back service porch. They would fight and bark at nite. My husband went over 'to talk to him one evening and he told us he was waiting to give the one pup to the right party, arid hoped that would elithanate the disturbance. Two weeks later again the pups work us up early in the morning on Sat and Sun mornings. We had been up late both rates, and we needed to have some rest in the morning. I called him that Sunday nite again as the dogs were out barking, and he hung up on me, so 1 called .the .police. Finally things quieted down at nite, but continued early in the morning. In the meantime, most of the time I slept on the sofa in my living room, which is on the other side of my house. I work 3 days a week, and it is necessary I have my rest. Tuesday nite, 1 didn't get to bed until 11 and didn't get to sleep until after 12. A: 1 o'clock I was awakened by the pups crying and barking in the nite. I should have called the Police then, but 1 got so upset, and if I had Called them, I would not have slept all nite. As it was I slept 4 hours in all and 1 had to work the next day. I slept in the living room until 6 A.M. and went to my bedroom, but couldn't sleep there as the pups were out barking. I called the police and told them what had happned in the nite and also being disturbed early at 6 in the morning. That afternoon I went down to 'the Police station there to tell them what had happened, and they told me I should have called them at 1 when I was awakened. They went to talk to Mr. Ramo, but he wasn't home. He goes to work early in the morning, 6 days a week and lets the dogs out in the yard. Sunday nite Nov 10 the dogs barked until after 11 o'clock. Tuesday morning at 3 A.M. I was awakend by the dogs again, but did not call the police. Then on Saturday nite, or rather Sunday morning at 1.10 A.M. the small dog barked enough to awaken me, I called the. Police, but evidently I gave them the wrong address, as the Officer came to my home to tell me he couldn't find the place, and after.' gave him the right address, he told me to continue US cal/. the Police anytime there was a disturbance., 1 was so upset that evening I thought I was going to have a heart attack. That Is the reason I did not call. the Police on another such occasions of disturbance. In the meantime, during the rainy season things were quiet, then when it cleared, they continued to bark MO S t of the time during the day. We came to the conclusion they are lonesome, because when he is home on Sunday, some time, or when his tenant is home during the week, they are quiet. I talked with a S.P.C.A, officer, and he told me I didn't have to contend with the barking. They evidently contacted Mr. Ramo, as one evening we received a telephone call from him, and he told my husband in a nasty way, we didn't like dogs. He replied to him,„ we did not like barking dogs. He also said nasty things about me. 4/7/70 -Zagaaacla Added material WA. -2- My husband told him he wasn't home most of the time in the evening anc.rnever in the day time, and he didn't know what his dogs were doing. He said we couldn't do anything to him, perhaps if we did take him to Court, he would be fined $25.00. He elso said he knew some of the Hermosa, Police officers. In ether words, he wasn't going to cooperate With us. I called the S.P.C.A. again when they continued to disturb me„ but evidently nothing was done. .1 called the City Manager several times, and left a message for him to call me, but I never heard. I finally got hJ.n in his office one day. He said he would look in to the situation and I would hear from him, but I never did tiear. 1 kept a record of some of the April 15 The 545 A.M. 16 Wed. 6:10 Sund. 700 Mon. 7:00 Wed. 7:10 Thurs .7:05 Sat. 6:45 fl 11 19 17 61 hours and time 1 was awakened: May 2 Fri 6:05 A,M. " 4Sun,7:30 9 Fri 6:45 " Tune 3 Stm. 7:00 " " 15 " 7:40 " " 16 Mon. 7:20 " In MayOne evening in the nite, 200 or later, we were awakend by the dogs harking at a cat in our yard under our beddroom window. Sunday nit e Tune 15, we went to bed early, and were awakendd by the harking of the dogs running loose in their yard at 12:30 in the morning. We called the Pence to report it. My husband calle.d out to the dogs to quiet them in the meantime. Te also called Mr. Romo and he hung up on him. He called the. Police to get a report of what they did, and was told the officers went there and all 'was quiet, so nothing was done. Shouldn't they have contacted Mr. Romo? I feel the Police aren't trying to help us in the situation we have here. We are trying to LY another house, but it isn't easy to get another house like ours, in the locality we want. 1 talked to Officer Murray, and he told me that we can do something to get some help on the situation that exists, Since Mr Romodoesn't want to cooperate with us to eliminate the disturbance, caused by the barking of the dogs ,i want to make a complaint against him. I feel es long as had the dogs, the condition will continue to extst 1 am a taxpayer and home owner and I feel I should not be forced to move from My home, beczu se of.a nuisance Created by dogs, and an uncooperative neighbor. I want to make a complaint against him for disturbing the peace and am willing to sign a complaint and appear in court to ted,Idly against him. Mrs. Inez Russell 1633 Raymond Avenue 372-7481 II RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 1 2 .3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CETY COUNCIL or THE crrt OF HER.MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING ME REPORT OF TIDE CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR CONCERNING THE COST OF MATING NUISANCE ON PREMISES LOCATED AT 8 STRAND IN SAID CITY, WHICH COST SHALL CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST SAID PROPERTY. WHEREAS, under the provisions of Ordinance No. N. S. 343 there was submitted to the City Coria by the Chief Building Inspector an Accounting Report on the property hated at 8 S .,nd; as WHERFAS, the City Council did hear and consider said .retort together with any objectJono or votests in connection therewith, NOW, THEREFORE, TSE CITY COUNCIL OF TM CITY OF ifERIvIOSA BEACH, qtkii.XFORNIA, DOES HEREBY DETERMINE AND MOE= AS SECTION 1. „That the accounting of th cost of the.abatement of nui4iance on property located at P Sig‘ mulmnitted by Chief Building Official is h=:robyr confirmed. All objections or mtests are hereby overruled, and the cost of such abatement in the amount of .Fetar .'tar€i'. red and Twelve Dollars ($412.00) shall constitute a special assess/n sty,. inst the property hereinafter described, and shall constitutemaim 5 i4 property. The property referred to herein is legally described as follows: Lot 2., Block 1, &3+ -€nose Beach Tract, City of Hermosa. Beach, County of Los Angeles , State of California, as per map recorded in Mait Book 4188, ge 3, Parcel 25, Official Records of Los Angeles County. ATTEST. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this PROVED AS TO FORM: PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa l e ch, California CITY CLERK OITY ATTORNEY ACCOUNTING OF COST FOR ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE ON PE ISLES LOCATED AT 8 STRAND, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA its accordance with subsection («) of Section 2O3a5 of Ordinance M.S. 34 ; of the City of Hermosa Reach, the following is the accoant3ng. of cosi; of demolition of structures located at 8 Strand Hermosa Beach, Ca09f0 ACCOUNT 3 N Rid contract price for demolition of structures on above described bed prec i ses Pursuant to demolition contrect with: • Vaughn Golden 3124 West Ruhbdoux Wi sraaington, Ca$ i for ala Incidental. expenses Salvage Naive $432.00 none Total $432000 This accounting g report shall be submitted to the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beech at its regularly scheduled meeting of April 7, .1970 at which time the City C uncit shall 3 hear and pass on the report together with any objections or protests (which must be in writing) submitted by any of the persons liable to be <ssessed for the cost of abating said nuisance. °.FLET„ 197° Dated Sud t'ao Trott Budding. Director of the City of • Hermosa Reach, California March 27. 1970 Mr. L.C. Guthrie. Jr.' 1320 Strand Manhattan Beach.. -California Dear Mr. Guthrie: Enclosed herein Is a bill for demolition of structures at 8 Strand. Hermosa Beach. California in the amount of $412. Also enclosed Is an accounting of cost for abate gent of the nuisance at this address. There will be a hearing before the City Council on April 7. 1970 at which time you. the Owner. gey submit any objections or protests In writing. You have thirty days from the date of billing In which to pay the clela: for demolition of said structures. Fa i i ure to pay this claim shall cause the c 1 ty to. pi are a lien upon this property in the amount of $412. If you have any further questions. please contact the writer. Yours truly. • '811d M. Trott Directullding BMT: taw% Enclosure ,Pa • • Copy. Mayor & City Council Dear Sir, 25 Mar 70 In regard to the fence I have erected on the property of 662 1/2 Longfellow, Hermosa Beach, I would like to apply for a waiver of the variance fee as I feel that paying $ 50 is like handing money under the table so that I may possibly keep my fence at 6 ft. The City Hall is supposed to help the residents of Hermosa. I feel that by constructing a six foot fence I am not obstructing anyone's view but to have a little privacy and have a place for my child to play and not fear her running out into the street. I have called the Building Department before I put up the fence I was told by a secretary that the fence had to be a minimum of 3 ft. which I said I wanted to build a 6 ft. fence and she told me it was alright without any mention of a ten foot set- back. I erected the six foot fence on the property line which now I find out that it must be a maximum of 3 ft. The fence has cost me a lot of money which I won't give up so easily because I was given the wrong information. It took 6 phone calls to find out that I could apply for a variance, a waiver for the variance fee after the supervisor of the building department told me there was no way I could possibly keep my fence. And he supposed to know his job? I see no reason why I cannot have a fenced front yard when it does no harm and I have no back yard. There are a dozen places in the city with fences like mine in their front yard. I block nobody' s view but my own and it is not an eyesore. I don't feel I should pay a $50 fee for a variance when the fence has cost me more, which I was given the wrong information and have possibly lost that money for it if I have to cut it down. /s/ Douglas J. Sniffen Resident of 662 1/2 Longfellow Hermosa Beach COPY 3-24-70 I grant Doug Sniffen 662 1/2 Longfellow, permission to try to obtain a variance' in regards to the fence he has put on this property. • tel C.F. Rose, Sr. 662. Longfellow Ave. Hermosa Beach (owner) Mr. Doug Sniffen 662-1/2 Longfellow Hermosa Beach, California Dear Mr. Sniffen: NERbOSA €f*tr 1:3 CAiiioatifa March 20, 1970 zax Pl90 F ;;'6 v4 1 have inquired into the alternatives available to you concerning the fence which you constructed in the front yard. After discussing thts with several people familiar with the situation, !really think that the only acceptable solution will be to cut th height back to the allowable three feet. However, you do have these three options: 1. Reduce the height to that which is allowed, obtaining necessary Building Department approval for this work. 2. Apply for a variance to the Board of Zoning Adjustment (through the Building Department), to leave the fence at its present height, pay- ing the fee therefor. In light of past decisions, it would appear that your chances of successfully being granted a variance are low. 3.As U portion of i4o. 2 above, you eo..lu alae apply to the City Coun- cil for a waiver of the variance fee. Again, though, the odds are that the Council would not grant such a waiver. I also apparently gave you a more favorable answer on the construction and use of temporary higher fencing then has generally been the city's practice in permitting. I. am informed by the Building Department that their enforcement practice has consistently be -n to prevent the erection of temporary fencing in all cases possible. • Page 2 (Mr. Doug Sniffen) There also remains the question of gaining the property owner's consent to apply •for any such variances, since our oa+dinances require that any such zoning action must be applied for only by the property owner or an agent with the property owner's written permission. It is unfortunate that a communications misunderstanding apparently arose between you and those with whom you spoke in the Building Department. Questions on fence heights are so fr qu =nt, and th =° information is so simple and uncomplicated,. that it is difficult to acknowledge that erroneous informa- tion may have been given. However, mistakes do occur from time to time, and this may have been the case. Please communicat your intention concerning a fence &te r. Sod Trott in the Building Department at your earliest possible convenience. WCM:mm cc: Bud Trott Robert Crawford Hank Doerfling S incerely, WESLEY C. MC DANIEL City Manager • April 2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: IA, sley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Beach Development Matters.. Gentlemen: This item on the agenda attempts to tie together three elated matters for City Council consideration: a) Pro. osed jemeLus for Beach Developa.. The attached prospectus is presented- as a means of organizing the committee, procedure, and subject matter for preparing the beach development elenlent: of bur. GenwalJR:i...a39 whieh,isi.sieurgently needed. This prospectus has already been circulated for comment and discussion to Most of thepartiesincluded, and it appears to meet the approval of those with whom I have talked. In fact, the Parks and Recreation.ComMission has jurnpeci the gun and already appointed theiT two representatives. If the City Council approves of this procedure, it is recommended that the prospectus be approved . and instructions given that -the necessary appointments be made and the work commenced. b) itessiesl Life cteliiarleltrle. • - Despite what may be publicly thought through various public appear- ances and press accounts, the basic design on the proposed head- quarters appears to be in fairly good shape. We are close to com- -pleting preliminary design on the structure which appears to meet both operational and aesthetic desires. With any luck at all,, we intend to have a plan for presentation to the'City Council Tuesday evening, ,e,eeking approval so that working.drawings may commence. The necessary ground lease provisions still have to be completed, but these can be done subsequently to design approval since they appear to pose no significant problems. c) County Health Offtcers Letter. This letter. has already received wide publicity and needs .no added comment at this time. it Should be noted °that the subject matter included therein will be Considered in the development of the beach plan tiotp4.411 (a) abolie,', Respectfully sub 'ad,' /At WESLEY/C. MC DANIEL WCM:mm Enclbs-ure• City Manager • • 5UGGESTEP PROSPECTUS BEACH DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OF HERMOSA BEACH GENERAL PLAN Committee Planning Comm is s ton Recreation & Park Commission Improvement Commis s ton Council Liaison Repres Technical: Technical .Advisors ntative 2 members 2 members I member 2 members City Manager City Planner Director of Public Works Director of Parks and Recreation (as affected): County Director of Beaches State Parks and Recreation Representation Ex -officio: Project Coordinator: Plan. Review pyi AtonB: Plan To Include: Chamb r of Commerce Representatir-e City Planner Improvement Commission County State Parks and Recreation Commission Planning Commission City Council General location and design criteria for: Lifeguard facilities Play equipment Utility needle Rest rooms Other recr,tational areas Landscaping Storm water structures Signs Sand control and shaping Strand relationship Strand improveme ts, include: Signs Provision for user access, properly improved. paving, width, wall, lighting • • Page 2 ark shall also include reference to: General location and design citta for: Parking, both on and off beach Improved vehicular access Other transportation systems Beach area planning and zoning Pier area improvements Downtown commercial interrelationships Private use of beach areas Off -sham features: surfing reefs, underwater gardens, groins, etc. Pier developments Plan shall Interface with: State plans and criteria County plans and criteria Redondo Beach plans Manhattan Beach plans City General Plan Prepared by City Manager, 3/19/70 R.' S. FITZGERALD DIRECTOR COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES 1101 STRAND REDONDO BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90277 March 25, 1970 Mr. Wesley C. McDaniel City Manager of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mr. McDaniel: BUSINESS PHONE: FR 4.4022) 9.5 SP 2.1811) EMERGENCY PHONE: FR 2.2162) 24 HRS. I am writing you in response to a letter I received from Dr. Heidbreder, the County Health Officer, concerning public restrooms on Hermosa Beach. Per Dr. Heidbreder's request, I am hopeful that I can meet with you and/or a representative as you so desire as soon as possible. As you probably know, there is currently state legislation on this matter; so that local government may make its own decision, I respectfully request an early meeting. Thanking you for your consideration, I remain Very sincerely yours DF:ju Enclosure Dick Fitzg= ald Director Honorable Quentin L. Thelen City Editor, South Bay Daily Breeze City Editor, Hermosa Beach REview COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES HEALTH DEPARTMENT G. A. HEIDBREDER, M.D., M.P.H. • HEALTH OFFIC1R Mr Dick Fitzgerald, Director Department: of Beaches County of Los Angeles 1101 -Strand 'Redondo Beach, California 90277 220 NORTH BROADWAY; LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 TELEPHONE 625.3212. March 17,'' 1970 De ar.Mr,'Fitzgerald. �►It:.has.come to my -attention that two certain sections of: public beaches operated by your Department are grossly inadete as far as provisions for public restrooms are concerned. One of these sec+ions is in -County territory comprising Corral Beach and Surf Riders. Beac+.. .It is my understanding tint construction drawings for the restroom fac:.lities are now complete ane the facilities will be in- stalled by the end of the coming summer. s -.The second..section, and one of considerable concern to this Department, is a2.7 miles stretch of heavily used beach'extending from the Municipal Pier' s.;in'the City of Manhattan Beach to the southerly city limits of Hermosa Beach. This is one_of`our most heavily used beaches and one of the most z ;a desirable.:: Within this 2.7, miles stretch there is only one public -reit. room structure,. yet by your estimate there are as many as 140,000 persons` using this beach on'a busy summer day. Citizen complaints to your staff, because of'this lack of toilets,,have been numerous amounting to ai many as ,several hundred pet day. This very serious situationis-conducive to contamination of the beach`sagd�, >_ and :the ,ocean waters with human waste and should not be tolerated if we are to protect and preserve one of our most precious natural resources for the benefit: of: a11' persons. , ill you please work' with the governmental agencies involved and develop a plan and tionetable`to° provide adequate restroom facilities for this problem area and submit. this plan to this Department for approve' before canstruction is pegun. This., approval shall be submitted in accordance with Section 7956, :California Administrative Coda, Title 17, Public Health. t will be appreciated ifou will keep me informed of developments. y,s; I i k Ver truly, yours, • ,H. DS m :Messers. $ugge, ` isamsey,: Art.Reinhardt, .D.P. G.A. Iieidbreder, Health Officer .D. M.P. J: z to� x 14 g U >- 15 z�Q Z )o a �- 3 ) 16 Ft J q �s017 [k 4. en d 14 04 ay..: 18 X Z 0 0 30 y 20 0 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 19 29 30 31 COMMUNITY RECREATION AGREEMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - PIER MAINTENANCE, LIFEGUARD SERVICE, BEACH. CLEANING .SER,V; CE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this Aed `-' day of BY AND BB(WEEN AND 1970, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH herein- after referred to as .;.'City," COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a body corporate and politic herein- after referred to as _'County," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County and the City of Hermosa Beach are desir- ous of entering into an arrangement whereby County assumes opera- tion of City's beach, pier and lifesaving activities in order to continue the high level of service previously enjoyedon the Hermosa Beach front; and WHEREAS, such cooperation between public entities is author- ized by Section 16650 et seq.:of the California Education Code relating to programs of community recreation; NOW,:: THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. County will furnish all necessary lifeguard servicesrand all. necessary beach cleaning services at the north and south beaches in the City of Hermosa Beach commencing on July 1, 1970 and terminating on June 30, 1971 provided, however, that this agreement shall be renewed automatically from year to year unless cancelled by either party upon ninety (90) days' written notice. Any such cancellation shall be effective on the 30th day of June of any year provided that written notice has been received by the other party at least- ninety (90) days prior to such June 30. io 2. During the period from October 16 through April 30 of. each year County. will limit its beach cleaning services to the following: a. Raking with utility tractor every other week. b. Rubbish pickup once a week. c. Minimum land policing four hours per week. d. Opening of necessary storm drain outlets during the rainy season, and closing subsequent to the season. e. Removal of dead marine life on the beach. 3. County will perform the following pier maintenance. 12 service during the term of this agreement: 13 a.. Cleaning the pier and associated restrooms so as to 14 maintain them in a clean and sanitary condition. 15 b. Providing electrical maintenance including replace 16 ment of bulbs, bulbcovers, switches,and the repair 17. 18 19 of shorts for both pier lighting and security light. Maintain water in foghorn battery. . Maintain the landscaped area at the foot of the pier. 20 County shall not be responsible for the following: 21 .: Major equipment repair or'overhaul.' 22 b. Replacement of structural or nonstructural equipment. 23 c. Replacement of plantings. 24. d. Utility costs. 25 e. Major alterations or improvements. 26 f. Major painting. 27 4. It is understood. that County shall undertake no. physical xl construction or alteration to the pier and beach areas unless such 29 construction or alteration is first consented to by City. In 30 addition, the, level of services provided in this agreement by 31 County shall be at substantially the same level as provided in .32 previous agreements entered into between City and County and any.. -2- FeS a y' ++=".3ux K.."i s..:.. ,..'^s. : .:,:r R3. f., it,.�:..1.. 1;4 41: 1 ,f.. G. f i dr:c, i c �7y .�LE✓,. .r.1 re? 4.r.-;'3.la1EiT 'f�a^tG: , fi'i�T +'sp r✓,r:e. ., change in such level of, service must be first approved. by City. 5. In interpreting the normal service aspects of this. agreement, County will perform such other beach, pier, refuse collection, or recreational services as maybe agreed upon between County' Director of Beaches and City' City Manager during the term of this agreement, provided that such services are , IN WITNESS. WHEREOF, .the County of Los Angeles, byorder of its Board -' of Supervisors,; has caused this.agreement'to be executed in its behalf by the Chairman of said Board and attested by the Executive Officer -Clerk thereof, and:, the City of Hermosa Beach has executed this agreement, or caused it to be duly executed,-` the day, month and: year first, above written. CITY • :RMOSA B C. ATTEST: JAMES S. MIZE, Executive. Officer and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 30 JOHN D. MAHARG 31 County Counsel Assistant .4)zil. le MO TOr It -fes C„.. it,slar..1a.niel City .4. FROM: :;o7 -4n. E. Stevens,, Director "clor2m SUBaECT•41 Coy Storm Drain Project At their meting of Decelliber 2nd e 1969‘_ the City Council approved specifications for the construction of County Storm Drain Project No, 1105e Mit 2e a minor portion of 'which ttlas to be constructed within the limits of our city, After receiving:bids for the project, the Flood Control District decided not to award a contract becr-tuso og an adliguitv in the Notice invitingf Dtas 'which Ied to a qaestion as to portions of Tioc&k involved, While the project uas being prepared gor re -advertising, additioal fundsbecame 10..e gnortE,TML, for aa increased scope of constrrm tient Therefonee the plans and specifcations 'ere revised to over the additional work. This. office has 40W received a copy of Specifications for the con- struction of BUD -2 - Redondo 2eadh Project'M,..ChTaSY-330, i the Cities of Redondo Beache. Torrance and Hermosa Beache California. Bids for this project will be rece'llied on April 240. 19704 he portions of work, appliczible to Mermosa each are found to be acceptzble4 The Dist*Act has requested that the City Councilg 1 FormaZIy approve the ubject Speclleations. Authorize the Loa Angeles Covaty flood Control Diotr.lx-It to proceed vith construction ao doricribed therein. Gnat the District peaurAssion to occupy and use the pviblic streets in the City of Nmmosa Beach to constrctlo oPerate- and maintain, the fatom drain Jx,stallation„ It is requested that this item be brotigLt before the City Council at their meeting of April 7th for their approval. The specifications ama plans are on file in this office and maybe reviewed at aqv time ehon1d you or aAy of the ecancil m4Tibers so desire:, yxml E, STEVENS Director of Vublic Wcirks .1111S:jw /4) April 2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Joint Powers Agreement, Fire Training --City of Inglewood. Gentlemen: As the City Council will recall, we recently approved an Interim Agreement with the City of Inglewood covering fire training services; in which Inglewood agreed to provide basic recruit training at a set price of $700.00 per man. There was no obligation upon our city: this agrees Ynt simply constructed a procedure to utilize this training if we so desired, and guaranteed the price, but did not require us to utilize the service. (As a practical matter, however, there are no alternative acceptable training sources available at this time.) Throughout the past two years, we have utilized this cooperative training program with very great success, and strongly contemplate continuing it in the very near future. As a second stage in this undertaking, and to render this a more permanent relationship, the City of Inglewood plans to construct a new fire training center utilt'ztng leaseback fi.n.ancing under a Joint Powers Agreement, with all of the participating cities being parties in the Joint Powers authority. It should be stressed again that entering into such an agreement does not obligate our city whatsoever. The agreement for us remains the same --the availability of recruit training at a price of $700.00 per man, guaranteed for r*: five Rear period. Inglewood simply intends to use these agreements to bolster their own financial strength in obtaining the needed bonding money. The City of Inglewood alone would be obligated to repay all funding, even in :nese of default. The proposed new facility offers many training advantages over the present location being used, and its construction would enhance the level of fire protection training for all cities taking part. By terms of the agreement, our Mayor would have a seat on the Joint Powers Board and our Fire Chief would hold a seat on the technical Board of Fire Chiefs. It is strongly recommended that we approve participation in this Joint Powers Agreement, Due to its length, the material has not been reproduced for inclu- sion in this agenda, but I would encourage your review if interested in this offer. Respectfully submitted, A42xli WESLEY C. MC DANIEL WCM:mm City Manager 1/ NAME, Anr)itussi, ANtp Tt;.t.&:t'Ftib`Ni. 'eti'tie�fr;&: LESTER 8,, KEMPF Attorney at Law 900 WilshireBoulevard, Suite 123') Los Angeles, California 90117 620.055) 1!'LVottroiEt(S) FOR .ilaiintiff 114.1111,6' t,•r UM' 4)r 4 Ili 1' rl"t6'r:S SUPERIOR COURT OF TIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALICE FlEvirr iRe t i f d' 't! 17(51) v . CITY OF ] EICAOSA BEAM, ; g through DOE Aa inc1ur9ivor, QM; 1411IMEZE SUMMONS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA to the above named Defendant(s) • You art' directed to file with the Clerk of this Court in which the above entitled action is brought a written nieddtng in response to the Complaint within ten days after the service on you of this summons, if aerved within the above-named county or within thirty days if served elsewhere. that if the action is against the state pursuant to Se>'tton 7::51.5 of the Coda, of Civil Procedure, within You arc notified that unless you so file a written responsive: pleading, the plaintiff wtll t.o},n jute n.l':'' for .(r!_: money or damages demanded in the Complaint, arising upon contract, or v4.11 apply to the Court for ,rt', other relief demanded in the Complaint. iiitihi 1 3. 19 Dated You repay seek the ndvicT of an etfforne3. on any matter coianceted with the ya>nint or this summons. Such attorney shook, be eni's ,a.Fitei within the time limit stated i ilia, smnim ris nc r filing a wa ttet.i pleadiaag to the earnf: i'. itiae. W:fF,L AM G. SHARP, County Clerk and Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles 19 By_ K Pb Cr E Deputy NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED (Secs. 61.0 and 474 C.C.P.): You are hereby served in the within action (or proceeding) in each capacity checked below: . y On behalf of _ ..as a per -ng upon whom the sttrnmons. and a copy of the complaint must be served to effect service again>t said party under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure, Section: '"7 41 l (1) (as aga nst. a domestic corporation) r"T 411(2) (as against a foreign corporation, or nonresident joint stock compt:ny or association, doing businetz iri thi state) P-'] 411(2.1) (as against a partnership or other unincorporated aKcociation) 411(2.2) (as against a foreign partnership) You are also served as an individual A., (or on behalf of) the person sued under the fictitious name of . .• !, rrr: ri .t'ie';.ti.' . t .r d ,r•r ' Ieftnrt ( r ?'See. 420.) fP N'i : he in writ,,: r• , r 1.,rr� (rr••rk int P•• "le •d c.iwvY..:nd Yen' d u:h vth ' cle'k r„use rt 7/' /: r•,..f r;t rcer it .f 7111 :1.0ereof on p! uu.:i/`uC i' r .tn v 1i .. .rttr,o.7j•44Pt.'1 !t':PI• !/'t nter' `rr1 !.( f,'a:u the ;.i,• .,, ( „ur. * of r atii.:ptrrJ Rev ! 1 •e. • I (Sm. reverse mid' for ?roof of cede kr) SUMMONS ( General) (,.” C.` V:,H 4rr6 407, 410. i'4, i:•. rt 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 • LESTRP KlimOTr Attoency t &al/ 900 viithira Scpulwpgd, Alite.3 L'oo Amv&T.om( itfogl'alo 2;051,77 Taaaphonze 4520-0550 Attanme gc& FtrAnttff •TWZRIOR county OT TN2 maga or cALTromgA Inn TER t7KJUNTY 017174g0 MN:NMI :1 ALZCI-11 ZAKITIT,R0- 11' ) PO. LQ- t 1,, TV., 12 int.sliviiff, ) ) CaMPLUAT W021 WARCBS )• ) 'WO PZREONK MITUREMO 14 cm!' or IMOWSP. nexclz, Don x 1) thsraasts 17X1 ,E, ing,t7ovolvo, ) l5':. iiMgcneentts, ) 16• , 1 17 . Pltdatif,q alluvvomk 18: I 1'. The frame aums or e2E7aciitlege ebathmr indtxdftsl, .v.1.0NitNealteo 1 acIpociate dor otherwiao, .gf ezOomdemZu DOE 7 ttragslb UOIS Z6 tImgLuzWe, ....)-: 4re il,,,Tiknawst tz plaimtigf at fliti tiga? eLaiutteg tIK?jt;m OUOG i I *OA eicKendaato by onch giatitiPne =nom ard wAL1 mv-Z% Ysmo.ro (Id '.':, Wart to am2m4 ChiA ompulziat ts gem &mill fslo urmil wgra,5 firma Z4 mapaciltios @I! ani6 deffemlAmto vase am aglaz P.rm tognrsac 26 Plaintiff iD falOacmd ana telemem t;hoIrcwm aklefpol 1 a:ea mil timto bav011 wationsd, ftfeaftnita DOU F Citroa Dea v, 26 inea.uutvo, war* th.,% vpanto, movummto and egplwvizo ee degertftint 29 CMIT OF ranmosA MACE, net,tng tho ometTa ma a=pli, thalff 30. egliei mearIcy end ailmAoyamt. 31 32 ptafaatiill thibir2tedi emed Itte>laTogi ravn thoanaam allei;fw tILIA 2 5 4 5 6 8 9 10 ?.1 12 13 nt all timea horein metatioAd, 6efeadanto POE W. thipmgh DOE xe inctusivo, were gorfarnmilntgX antAtflw and paKitAaa/ oldaftvLsimatT, ogl,the Strata oE Canfooniii cmopcmaible fitv th2 inzpa,staGm, gvammfx4 mamt, magAte4iAnce, ccavtgmtam amA Matma oct Mat saNtatim =At) on the gealic •walkway l(rxzWa BR We oUntwea slimMe Pailla2ez Aveme mnd 1.6th aftst, ft.'ha Inv of Ornmegets Eal(0.4, Ormaarp of Lao Aumeleo, State of Califagniao Dofcadaut en7 06 NMI A 12hag io mcazipal Mums:rat/am, e public entityp emd a Watamat ottglviaem Sf fan Mte e2 California, locetod m the Omn%y of Me itmgaime . V At ell timm Iterein mmtlowzde maca eft' Zte dagmea,,ats wno tha 14 'Meat*. 6cPvant =el weLaTe@ af 0,4gTIP Meg defeadwIt, getAng within 15 16 17 tbo course and eletpo of m1.6 agency avd emplaymn. amd beg000 Dericeasbor /4* def,...i&Mbor am emA cf them, 18' so nsgligentky T -m6 caraeasty ognmtrezted, krogrecteit, matrallv4, repaired 19 unmated/cad maiftaius4 ttat emnlatn *arb teagted cwm tto ymtlic way 20 zt the matkeagt memar of gftrackle Aw/vms gnA Wita Coraec in tha City cR irlAgme &Rick, CoamW (DV Etas Araactio Stat49. og Califtnamo dangerouv that oetd anTb.wiss in a limcfteu, aumeb10, ditstoettM,tal OfaceUnig 21 22 23 .Z4 25 26 27 go ao to wasfeltacm IzMotud te uc49.0Wieez mAna wrzy. €4‘za tsk7itt alefm MINZ oidt etif aege,..vm.10 AwrY,,Acao Tag e,Vol VgDfOre Df 14, L',009) ttoRertamtc„ a3TA wsera es? 0:141m0 ka6. actual aud eou tavAnITA1 mettom oV the bgeFitc cw.A.:dto0c 28 ftefervtivre and fterspaiue 052aittmgf chc evtb at cke wvatioa 29 haireingibotro set VacCh. 30 VZEI 31 At all timpl5 heTain anntionm4, deeam4nmtg, Lawkl mah OINInt 32 mtgl'Igently and vareleeloW repaio gad plvtAar fam) uPtenri,., 3 and dangarouo deumelbed hanardsmeition. 2 Xx Om DOCOADRE 1,4,, 193%e an Oda diaatt mad smammto moon; GC 4 wilg&kgmao ama oamlivamova aagomftmtzo ao baglambeve 5 avt footh* whiLs prolvitLfg waa e pg42ggotam cm Ubm 6 ct tho west aide eg Kftimen Avognsl, agm-asormamS TIMatlel sow eaapat fto, &TA olgeocIRIV pavadmutak 8 Otzu6Ny omotminad the@ heceim&gtex ftewillts6 imIngtee smA danzw. 9 X 10 Ap the flimat aaa gvamInmto imamLt ot tb.m eimAtwt e2 cWeattmttpd 11 wD blvainallaws ost 2,w,X14, plaimiaff wao hmgt gaiA La2mane4 ku her 12.. kawiLtLe sWreauth mna activitgo Geotalmin LOmmics tv hog 1111dr 13 �M 'amok nag LO ta Me RAWTCTOS swam and usrpun, at o2 14 .%&idt imj rim Wave csum&d, amt amitinift bm cauee plaintkae geenft 15' mental, pi asavous pain ao0 emgagextav olatutIef lo 16' Waxma rivad lbelkwao and Magma elinem that cold talinalien 18 17 LeGault im pagramnont dim*Mlity to pLantiefe WA (11D DU,Sw(tiera emaTal davala lm tke omm of 079,000000.., 19 20 2 ,' 3 27 2 8 29 30 31 32 Ala; a Ougt[lor,digetA cm4 pravimitiP roma eg eho emletmt &447,E4aRta, Trkve&soMove oot forth, plaiiattge umn mvired tz,A 6id cgrotoy Aroiciamoe olargowas aa4 a IwilspitTA tg ewauolne, tzzat cm,we Oac hero am4 4id lame comdicalI amid] inoideet21 cmgmeau im sa mmufent Le samoom Ws (deor glmimUff 141 t ,ftrmad cmd beltewem all 0'4o:remit mUcynv faftt, Ititelgo %III. Tat additional medical em b•° (awe, wact mir4snt ez.2 .;134,,d11 votzmr- at thim ttqle? plaintiff? will aolk Ttozvci of court to mao6d this clA7p/g2ta tomet OFoeth CNID c4lorcamt auftalt of -all medioaa am4 iacidentla eavenom tobAsa tha..aalmn nro ancartatmmd. Ae a ftrther, Calatit anA poemilinto reomlt of the tpanduct og ftfolaftnts, aa hareirlabove Not flort4, plaintiff htt% bton Prevoli5 .3- fram attondin to bar usual Occupation and haa muttained a 'Wen 0.t 2 onrntwe am6 eamIng vgwing thminft an amant ultidk Ao mitt 3 Tzeteimety negguMaim,T4 at Mhgg timsf plateatieg igsgbm.gi naZ 4 ieleaCuiyos amd Wriwom ateva ftMt dis Rittl melba' alOSiticiama 5 Lom of eandaw, cm -1; Wefttiffewt Lego e)0. mminf plzmpe tn ttsa 6 fttwoo anwt ammmt of 0hivell is ,q4 -moa amrt TAU 1113 evati,be.to aufma thim mlaplala fpe intiort tho moat emome of 8 liptslintLEVQ leam ef oarmAno mad lasm of GeTift UMW', tWilt 9 tagmey Lmag9ma cm0 gmageclaiva, when kts 240110 ko azaut.ezmIL 10 11mEGREP.Mac glafatgef powa 12 emeh og ChTne 04gs 1Z, Gaftreal damwee in ttio cdmonmt af $W0000f00a 14 Maim/ eads tmlftatzl cmpcPakw emagiAimg bo wwzfu 15 taac ag etrmings and law of mmemin mai= maraagaz to 16 prIviOv 11 Vatium midkoV1 mmei, inadmtssa emptance accoweAmg praof; deEmpft4Bteo ama .16 pecercv 5. ratars Lone of exmainve andi Xemm ok asrmius pv6zo eamgdimg Moto mg malt' Ameraggs4 tiv etd 7. ftch ttheg mRA lurthor weLkilf 50 eae Mmct &Arm jnot and prkszkw lat y44111d-STV 23 4'} Din(h61; Mila 106 IWO 2b fk051411 B30 SH.E0re 26 27 2.8 29 30 31 32 %ZVI, artetzweaa ,00‘.74m 7.11`41322c-nwat'orturi.A.VarsisMITS*14117.3%.Y4,...M. kg4=itacitialtilifirt4ariaRit.ISZAM.' liaragilarlagatatiNak AttaligggleVelarZPIggatilt724; VE -ea lAga. DMZ, An' TWA P0401. NUtAgn IS AYYa'�+':9€ 8 M Lamm ['a^o KBEW p OO' k iLt hi ' a 1( and 620-055f) plaimiAtlf CAMEYth➢ iom AWES FigsTrEge, .,.n.e..,..,.......aawaracrorxaam.ae L...*anacnm:s,: marr.m.veva»u.n.nrzameall.Aa.wmm..s,..syr..++„..20.4nr.>mnV^rsvxrc.:_nr..x.:..,,v.. SUESEOR, COURT OF THE srpas OF CALEFORMA PQR THE CUN YO?LOSA GEL a -A% .4Lamclrrawv-loonmacosemeargrwlemPsY Lr+:maverussmalni a+aaaue *F11'93suvr aglarns......Sr:.wvaraTaTIca•M/ i>+wd3 �u;be.vtfaav�CvaoslYnAv GM Mal= vi L•ar mauVit lifiO2 x9 iaaUteiVO4, CRAtiCiaNa NWADMIP ansa. ..........ues.w..ave„a.._. r.m..a*" .. 0.4 satcaam.... ra a.m.: g11 rncavacra<aoAeveurcxwcnusax..ew.v......n,r.ee<.c>rer....a.+aurr.. CiVitC't ARATK ASSOfel' ° ,E1 • ....T .....staverraroaa,..rar,<..rmaaa...4..a,.a,.r-...tea , r.Mr.x ecn.:aathaa,„ ,�...:a.. atuna The undersigned declares: 1. That the above etttitled action is filed for proceedings in the District of the Superior Court of Les Angeles County. as grrrvid in Section , Male 18 of this Court, for the fallowing reason: Z 2. That the above entitled action is filed for proceeding id the SA .` 't3t • District under Section R Rule 18 of this Court. (Fili:➢f in district Msh re iniur' cM.cursed in all pegs on'al injury, wrongful death, assault and battery, and medical malpractice cases is mandatory.) 3. That the abaye entitled cause of action for personal injury and or tvraonghil death crane in theDi trtet1 that mandatory filing of such actions is not required in said Manch district. that request is hereby made that the • action be filed in the Central District as a Central District matter. 4. That the above entitled cause of action for personal injury and or wrongful death mise ito the Central E)iatriet and is therefore beim filed in the Central District as a Central District raatt,s1.. 5. That the above entitled cause of action for personal initnry and/or r. .eeM death ?IOTA' out- side of the County of Los Angeles, to beat: and is therefore tieing filed in die Central District as a Central District matter. a declare under penalty of parjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on,''tfIra 1.0 a 19 70, at P„` rgelL . California. ;aS➢ge oi§i 1, ludo, kaaki?; OTE: Circle the number of the paragraph applicable. Fill in No. 1 na No. 2 when the aetion to hu filed in a branch district. Fill in No. 3 or No. G v1hen the action ins to he filed in the Central District. • 4 Mo OF ASSIGNMENT Y.',srT.t t:»sa'asa • April 2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager S UBJECT: Refuse Contract Gentlemen: We will have materials ready by Tuesday, and will forward them in advance. Basically, we plan to solicit proposals for service, on a new five-year con- tract. New provisions would include: a) A revised unit count system. b) No pickup amount limitation. c) Revised container regulations. d) Provisions for renegotiation if plastic bags are used. e) Periodic extra pickup included. f) Bin requirements for apartments. g) Improved truck and bin standards. The major policy question to be answered wtU be that of exclusivity, or open competition, on commercial, industrial, and/or apartments (and, if apartments, where is the breaking point?). As an alternate, we would suggest a proposal system using alternates, so that the bid cost per unit with commercial exclusivity could be evaluated against the bid (presumably higher) without exclusivity. The choice could then be made with cost factors known. In general, the contract provisions and new regulatiQns are greatly improved in all areas, hopefully eliminating the problems and complaints now present. We'll review it in some detail Tuesday. Respectfully submitted, WESLEY C. MC DANIEL City Manager WCM:mm • • RESOLUTION NO, N. S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA EACH,, CALIFORNIA,. APPROVING THE ACTION OF THE FM0111'114E24 COMMISSION AS CONTAINED IN ITS RESOLUTION P.C. 154-736„ AND ACCORDINGLY DENYING THE APPLICATION OF DAVID D. AND F,L,EANOR C. CONNORS FOR A CONDITIONAL US$ PERMIT FOR A COCKTAIL BAR ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1133-1137 PIER AVENUE,, FOLLOWING RECONSIDERATION OF ITS ACTION TO DENY„ TAKEN ON SEPTEMBER 2, 1969„ AS COMMANDED BY JUDGMENT OF SUPERIOR COURT. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission, after hearings duly and regularly held as provided by law, did in Resolution P.C. 154-736, adopted July 21,, 1969, deny the request of David D. and Eleanor C. Connors for a Conditional Use Permit filed under the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No,, N. S. 154,, as amended, to sell alcoholic beverages on property located at 1133-1137 Pier Avenue; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms and provisions of said zoning ordinance„ David D. and Eleanor C. Connors have taken their appeal fm the determination and action of the Planning Commission as set forth in its said resolution to the City Council, and the Council after public hearing acted to concur with the findings and determinations of the City Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the applicants did then appear before the Superior Court of the State of California as Petitioners vs the City of Hermosa Beach,, its City Council and the individual members thereof, and the Planning Commission and the Individual members thereof, Respondents, and proceedings were, remanded to Respondent with command to set aside its decision dated September 2, 1969 to deny said Conditional Use Permit and to reconsider its action in the light of the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; and WHEREAS, public hearing concerning this matter was set in City Council Chambers on the 3rd day of March, 1970, and the applicants, David D. and Eleanor C. Connors, being present and represented by Counsel Walter N. Anderson, and oral and documentary evidence having 'been presented and each member of the City Council having before- him those documents referred to in the Judgment and set out above in addition to other documents, all of which are set forth in that certain document entitled "Connors File" and duly filed with the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, and it being determined that no further evidence was desired to be presented by the Applicant and the Council a/ • arid the Council being fully informed on all matters and the public hearing closed, the City Council did une.nimously direct the City Attorney to prepare. a forrnai. resolution setting forth the findings -of the City Council, and further to set forth in said formal resolution that the recoramenda.tion of the Planning Commission was upheld and the appeal was denied. On the 17th day of March, 1970, the formal resolution was presented to the Cou.ncil, whereupon Mr. Anderson, Counsel for the Appellant, objected that the formal resolution did not accurately set forth the findings of the City Council, and further at that time Councilman Bela:sco stated that he had reconsidered the matter and at the time of the vote an the formai resolution did intend to cast his vote in favor of- the aPPellant, -NOW0 THEREFORE, THE°C-ITY couNca, OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA. BEACH, CALIFORNIA., .DOES 1-.TEREBY.RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That after setting aside its decision of September 2, 1969, the following members of the City Comma, based upon the evidence presented to each member, do find as follows: Mayoe.Thelen, Councilman Valentine and CounciireanWise do find, (a) that • this type of estabUshment is not °suitable in this location at this time; (b) that the • proposed cocktail lounge is adjacent to existing single family residences; (c} that there is a church in close vicinity; (d). that there is a school °$.n close vicinity; (e) that elemenMrY school children use PrOspect Avenue as a walking route; (f) that the. premists are located within the inimediate vicinity of a familY billard parlor whose main customers ere voting peoplewell as families, and in which location the serving of alcoholic beverages is prohibited; (g) that the conclusion of the Chief of • Police is concurred in, in that this use would not be of benefit to the welfare or morals:, of thiadommunity; and (h) that the appeal should be denied; Councilman Valdes finds, (a) that there %oifl be a significant increase in the volume of persons and vehicle traffic which will cause a detriment in the area; (b) that the proposed use is contrary to the General Plan, and (c) that the appeal should be denied; .and Councilman Bela.sco finds( (a) that there is not sufficient grounds to prohibit the use at this time, and (b) that the appeal should be granted-. -2-- • • SECTION 2. That said application by David D. and Eleanor C. Connors for a Conditional Use Permit to engage in the sale of alooi, located at /133-1137 Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beac4 • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST.... PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK .APPROVED AS. TO FORM: ioRtmeownitnes,S110 p XtY ATTORNEY ORDINANCL NO, N. S. 380 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA" AMENDING SECTION 7-2.4, "ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA.", OF CHAPTER 7, "BUILDINGS "„ OF THE CITY CODE OF. THE CITY OF HERM0E BEACH, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE MY' OF I-.TERMOSA BEA. CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION I. That Section 7-2.4, "Allowable Floor Area", of Article 7, "Buildings" „ of the City Code of the City of Hertnose Beach be, ..and is hereby amended to tend as follows: "Section 7-2.4. Allowable 'Floor Area "Add a new section designated as Section 206, which said .new section shall read as follows: "SECTION 206. "Notwithstanding any of the other provisions of this code, no building permit O r relocation permit shall be issued for any building or structure tr.o be used for residential purposes in which the total gross floor area, exclusive of open porch.es or gara..ges, is less than the following: (a) Single Family Residence - 900 sqUE):0 feet. (b) Two -Malay Residence - 500 square feet par dwelling unit. (c) Multiple -Family Residence, Efficiency Dwelling Unit - 400 square feet. (d) Multipie-Family Residence, One or More Bedrooms - 600 square feet. (e) Hotel o Motel - 150 square feet, exclusive of batroom, per unit. (i) parage Apartment - 550 square feet per dwelling unit." SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days aftcar the date of its adoption. SECTION 3. That the. City Welt. shall certify t:o the doption of this oxdinance„ and shall within. fifteen (15) days after its adoption cause said ordinance to be published at least once in the Hermosa Bee.a. Review, a weekiy newspaper of general 4' circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach., ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this PRESIDENT of the Cay Co'.ncta and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California clay CURL APPROVED AS TO FORM: G • IT! ATTORNEY .1.0.1=0.11.000•••••f•••••10 =10233.1 WV. • ORDINANCE NO„ N. S. 381 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA. BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. N. S 369, ADOPTED NOVEMBER 4, 1969, AND RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTEENTH STREET AND SMEENTH STREET • AND BETWEEN PALM DRIVE AND THE EAST SIDE OP HERIV1OSA AVENUE, FOR ZONING PURPOSES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. N 8. 154, AS AMENDED, AND AMENDING ZONING MAP OF ARTICLE 3, SECTION 302 OF SAID ZONING ORDINANCE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE any OF HERMOSA BEACI-I, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.. That after public hearings by the City Planning Co mission as prescribed by Zoning Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended, and after public hearing • as therein providedfor before the City Council, the following real 'peoperty, situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, that is: Lots 3 through 12, inclusive Mock 33, lst Addition to Heemosa Beach be and the same is hereby reclassified from General Commercial (C-2) Zone with Multiple -Family Residential Potential, to Multiple -Family Residential (R-3) Zone, and the Zoning Map of Article 3, Section 302 of said ordinance be, and the same is, amended as herein set forth, pursuant to PFOIliSiOLIS therefor set forth in said Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2. That said City Council has caused to be prepared a small area map of the area. or district affected by the zone change hereinabove ordered to be made, which said small erea map is hereunto attached, designated as "Exhibit A", and is hereby refereed to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Said small area map ("Exhibit A") is hereby adopted as, and shall be, an amendment • to the extent of the area, shown thereon and 'affected thereby of "Zoning Map of the City of Hermosa Beach" referred to in., and which is adopted by, the provisions of said Section 302 of Article 3 of said Zoning Ordinance, as amended, of said City. SECTION 3. That Ordinance No. N. S. 369, adopted November 4, 1969, is hereby repealed. SECTION 4. - That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its .adoption. • SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance, and shall, prior to the expiFation of fifteen (15) days from the adoption thereof cause the same to be publishe.cl t least once in the Hermosa Beach Review, a weekly newspaper of general! circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: „ R.ex VnilL.IsnM11.17/01,,,......,--ananalravormsrertem=1./SPIMAL,M.o.•••-rre,..,‘ watalownwrnagyas......oTroontersraFnaas. PRESMENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY AWORNEY RESOLUTION NO. N. S.. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE cagy COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO INITIATE AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 154, AS AMENDED, AFFECTING ARTICLE 14, "VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS", SECTIONS 1412, 1413 AND 1414, AND ARTICLE 15, "AMENDMENTS", SECTIONS 1513, 1512 AND 15134. REGARDING FINDINGS AND DECISIONS OF CITY COUNCIL NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT GENERAL PURPOSE OF ZONING ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, certain confusion has resulted from the interpeetation of Sections 1412, 1413 and 1414 and Sections I.511, 1512 and 1513 of Zoning OrdineAce No. N. S. 154, as amended; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to alleviate these ambiguities end to amend said eections, NOW„' THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCA. OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA- BEACH( CALIFORNIA, DOES rip,REB.17 RESOLVE AS FOLLOWSt SECTION 1. That purseent to the provisions of Article 15, Section 1501 of Zoning Ordinance No, N. S. 154, as amended, the City Council of the City of Hermosa. Beach does hereby declare its intentionto initiate the following amendments to Article .14, Sections 14124. 1413 and 1414 of said Zoning Ordinance, to read as follow= "SECTION 1412. COUNCIL TO ANNOUNCE FINDINGS AND DECISION. City Council shall announce its findings and decision within a reasonable time but not to exceed sixty (SO days following the close of the public healing, unless good cause is shown for the extension of time and the applicant or opponent ot both are notified of this extension and the reasons therefore The findings and decision shall recite the faets and reasons which in the opinion of the City Council make the approval or denial of the Variance oe Conditional Use Peewit necessary to carry out the geneval purpose of this ordinance, and shall order that the Ifariance or Conditional Use. Permit be granted, denied, or modified seblect to such conditions or limitations that it yjmpose. City Council. may incoeporate by reference all or part of any findings of any commission, hearing ' officer or administrative officer without expressly setting forth in full the findings of said commission, hearing officer or adrainistrative officer if the findings of said commission, hearing officer or administrative officer are in writing and on file with /7 • • the City Cl.erk and made a part of the pe anent record of the City, If the City Council does not announce its findings and decision, notice shall be given by mail to the applicant or opponent, or to both if they be different parties, of when, the findings and decision will be made so that the applicant or opponent or both may be present at the meeting when said findings and decision are announced. "SECTION 1413. DECISION OF THE COUNCIL SFSALL BE rugn. The action by the City Council on such matters shall be by majority vote of the members present and voting, and shall be final and conclusive, except: (1) The City Council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided that any modification of the proposed Variance or Conditional Use Permit by the Council shall first be referred to Planning Commission for report and recommendation, but the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold e public hearing thereon. Failure of the Planning Commission to report to the City Council within fort' (40) days after the neference, or such longer period as may be designated by the City Connoil, shall be deemed to be approval of the proposed modification. (2) Upon the return of the matter to the City Council, the City Council may by majority vote of the members present and voting approve, modify or disapprove the final recommendation of the Planning Commission on such matters. "SECTION 1414. NOTICE OF DECISION OF THE COUNCIL. Not later than thirty (30) days following the final decision of the City Council that a Variance or Conditional Use Permit be granted oe denied, notice of such action shall be mailed to the applicant or opponent, or to both if they he different partiesand one copy shall be attached to the Planning Commission's file of the case and said file returned to the Planning Commission for permanent filing. Failure to give notice shall not affect the decision rendered in these matters." SECTION 2., That the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby declare its intention to initiate the following amendments to Article 15, Sections 15/1, 1512 and 1513 of Zoning Ordinance No, N. S. 154, as amended, to read as follows?, "SECTION 1511. CITY COUNCIL TO ANNOUNCE FINDINGS AND DECISION. City Council Shall announce its findings and decision within a reasonable time but not to exceed sixty (6(0 days following the close of the public hearing, unless good cause is shown for the extension of time and the applicant is notified a this extension and the reasons therefor. The findings and decision shall recite the fa,cts and reasons which in the opinion of the City Council make the approval or denial of the amendment necessary to carry out the general. purpose ©f this ordinanae, and shall order that the amendmerat be granted, denied,. or modified subject to such, conditions or limitations that: it may impose. City Council may inoorporate by reference all or part of any findings of any conunission, hearing officer or a.dtrinistrative officer withot4 expressly setting forth in fult the findings of said commission, hearing officer or administrative officer if the findings of said,commissi011: heaving officer or administrative:officer are in v3riting end on file vitt the City Clerk. and reade a'Pest of the permanent reed of the City. the City Council does not announce its findings and decision, notice shall be given by mail to the applicant of vthen.the findings and decision will be made so that theapplicant may be present at the meeting when said findingS,a0 decision are announkied“ "SECTION 1512. DECISION OF CITY COUNCIL SHALL )3E FINAL. The action the City Council on such matters ehaillbe by majority vote of the members present and voting, and shall be final and corteluSiVe„ except• : (1) The City Council may aPpe*re, modify or disapprove. the recommendation of the Planning C0111111iSSi.01.1: provided that any modification o$ the proposed amendment by the CitYCOLIfiat shall first be refeneed to the Planning Commission for report and reaommeinfttion, but the Planning COEtialiSS1011 she/ not be 'eeLed to hold a public hearing itareon. Failure of the Planning Commission to report. to. the City council within forty (40) days after the reference, or stash longer period as mai: be designated by the City Connoil„ shall be deemed tO b approval of the proposed modification. (2) the return of the matter to the City Council, the City Council may by majority vote of the members present. and voting approve, modify or disapprove the final recommendation of the Planning Commission on such matters. "SECTION 1513. NOTICE OF DECISION OF THE COUNCIL. Not later than thirty (30) days following the final derasion of the City Council ordering an amendment to this ; . ordinance, Or denying an application or recomm.endation for an amendment, notiee of such -3- action shall be forwarded to the applicant at the address shown upon the application, and one copy shall be attached to the Panning Commission's Meof the case and said file returned to the Planning Commission for permanent filing. failure to give notice shall not affect the decis ion c"endereca in. these matters o « SECTION 3. That upon 't e adoption ion of this resolution of intention, the Planning Cornmissian hallo hold one public hearing- thereon, and notice of such hearing shall be given as pro=vided in Article 16, Section 1604 of Zoning Ordinance No. N S. 154, as amended. l SSE.'..1, APPROVED and ADOPTED this AT EST APPROV D AS To PORMM?o �p¢:.^:ofPA*wu+maror•vrsalrvnomc�unaswxr+•�>,urrtvat�nsi i<sikXlfliN,�iiq`i„' • _ _ �p....r.....r�..-..� PRESIDENT .DENT of the City CoUncil, and M,WOR of the City of Hermosa Beach,. California, a ' CLERK CITV , TPO NU § 1412 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 1414 Sec. 1412.. Council to announce findings and decision by reso- -. =lCution, Council shall announce its findings and decision by formal resolution not more than forty clays following the hearing, and said resolution shall recite, among other things, the facts' and reasons which, in the opinion of the council, make the 'granting or denial of the . variance or conditional use .permit necessary to carry out the general purpose of this ordinance, and shall order that the variance or conditional use permit be granted or denied or modified subject to such conditions 9r limitations that it may impose. (pec 1413 )ecision of the council shall be final. `"`The"action by the city council on such matters shall be by majority vote of the entire council and shall be final and con- clusive, except: (1) If the decision of the council is contrary to the recom- mendations of the planning commission and/or board of zoning adjustment, the city council shall make a re- quest for further report of the planning commission and/or board of zoning adjustment before it makes its decision final. Failure of the planning commission and/or board of zoning adjustment to act within forty days of receipt of the city council's request shall be deemed to be approval of the proposed change or addi- tion by the planning commission and/or board of zon- ing adjustment; (2) It shall require the affirmative vote of four-fifths of all of the members of the city council- to reject or modify the final recommendations of the planning commission and/or board of zoning adjustment on any such matters. (Ord. No. N. S. 375, § 3, 12-16-69) Note—See the amendment note following § 1405. Sec. 1414. Notice of decision of the council. of later than ten days following the adoption of a resolu- tion ordering that a variance or condition use permit be granted or denied, a copy of such resolution shall be mailed to the applicant or opponent, or to both if they be different Supp. No. 12-69 652 ., V.; •'.''tip •§.1500 APPENDIX A --ZONING § 1504 parties, and one copy shall be attached to the planning cam - mission's and/or board of zoning adjustment's file of the case and said file returned to the planning commission and/or board of zoning adjustment for permanent filing. (Ord. No. N. S. 375, § 3, 12-16-69) Note—See the amendment note following § 1405. Article 15. Amendments Sec. 1500. Ordinance may be amended. Boundaries of the zones established by this ordinance, the classification of property uses therein or other provisions of this ordinance may be amended whenever public necessity and convenience and general welfare require. Sec. 1501. Initiation of amendment. Amendments of this ordinance may be initiated by: (1) The verified application of one or' more owners of property proposed to be changed or reclassified. (2) Resolution of intention of the city council. (3) • Resolution of intention of the planning commission. Sec. 1502. Application for amendment. Whenever the owner of any land or building desires an amendment, supplement to or change of the regulations pre- scribed for his property, he shall file with the planning com- mission an application therefor, . verified by him requesting such amendment. Sec. 1503. Commission to hold hearing on amendments. Upon filing of a verified application for an amendment, or the adoption of a resolution of intention by the planning com- mission or the city council, the planning commission shall hold one public hearing thereon, and notice of such hearing shall - be given as provided in article 16 of this ordinance. Sec. 1504.. Time for. hearing. The hearing for an amendment to the land -use plan hereby established shall be held not later ; than forty days following Supp. No. 12-69 553 . . § 1609 • APPENDIX A -ZONING 1612 Sec. 1509. Transmission of commission's record .to city'coun- cil. Upon receipt of a written appeal filed with the city council by the applicant, as provided in this article, the clerk of the city council shall advise the secretary of the planning com- • mission who shall transmit to said clerk of the city council the planning commission's complete record of the case. • Sec. 1510. City council to hold public hearing on commission's • recommendations on amendments and on appeals. Within not to exceed forty days following receipt of the, • resolution from the planning commission recommending the adoption of the amendment or the filing of a written appeal from an order of the commission denying an appliCation for amendment as provided in this article, the city council shall conduct a duly advertised public hearing on the matter, pub- lic notice of which shall be given as provided in article 16. Sec. 1511. Cr council to announce findings and decision by resolution. The city council shall announce its findings and decision by formal resolution not more than forty days following the hearing, and said resolution shall recite, among. other things, the facts and reasons which, in the opinion of the city council, make the approval or denial of the amendment necessary to carry out the general purpose of this ordinance. • Sec 1511 Degsion of city council shall be final., treiciion by the city council on the application for amend- ment shall be by a majority vote of the entire membership of the city council and shall be final and conclusive except: (1) If the decision is contrary to the recommendation of the planning commission, the city council, shall request a further report of the planning commission before it makes its decision final. Failure of the planning com- mission to act within forty days of receipt of notice of Stipp. No. 12-69 • 555 . '• . . . $ 1513 :. • HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE 6 1601 the council's request shall be deemed to be approval of the proposed change or addition by the . planning com- mission; (2) It shall require the affirmative vote of four fifths of all members ofthe city council to reject or modify the final recommendations of the city planning commission involving the reclassification of any property. 'Sec. 1513. Notice of decision of city council. -'mot later than• ten days following the adoption by the city council of a resolution ordering an amendment to this ordi- nance or denying an application or recommendation for an amendment, one copy of such resolution shall be forwarded to the applicant at the address shown upon the application, and one copy shall be attached to the file in the case and the complete file returned to the planning commission for perma- nent filing. Article 16. Procedure, Hearings, Notices and Fees Sec. 1600. Commission shall prescribe form of application blanks and type of required information. The planning commission shall prescribe the form which applications are made for changes in zone boundaries, of clas- sifications, or for variance or conditional use permits. It may prepare and provide blanks for such purpose and may ' pre- scribe the type of information to be provided in the applica- tion by the applicant. No application shall be accepted unless ,it complies with such requirements. Sec. 1601. Acceptability of signatures on applications If signatures of persons other than the owners of property making application are required or offered in support of, or in opposition to,an application, they may be received as evi- dence of notice having been served on them of . the pending application, or as evidence of their opinion on the pending is- sue, but they shall in no case infringe upon the free exercise of the powers vested in the City of Hermosa. Beach as re- presented by the planning commission or city council. Stipp. No. 12-69 656 1 • LEGISLP`ITIVE ACTIO11-J1 by Councilman Wise. OF 4 5V TEl'O Opinion of City Attorney requested DISCUSSION - City Attorn.My Mirassou informed those pr sent that the issue was whether or not a General Law City could enact :s part of its zoning ordinance a provision that in order to overrule a recommendation of the Planning Commission regarding a 2,one change a legislative body required a 4/5 vote, as opposed to a simple majority in order to approve. Mr. Mirassou quoted applicable sections of the Government Code, and stated that cities may exercise a maximum degree of control over local zoning matters and it was therefore proper for the City to be more restrictive if it decided to modify or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission. He added that it would also clearly be within the power of the City Council to amend this so-called "4/5 rule" if so desired, or have the language modified or clarified. In view of the = mbiguity of this section of the Zoning Ordinance, Councilman Wise requested that the Council conaidreferring it to the Planning Commission for their study and recommendation of an amendment modifying the present requirements. During their discussion, the.Cc uncii also recom i nd -s4 that Sections 1412 and 1511 of •the Zoning Ordinance, requiring formal resolut1c nti reciting findings of Council be eliminated as unnecessary. ACTION - to instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution initiating a rnendm K nts to Zoning Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended, to revise Sections 1412 and 1511 related to formal resolutions reciting findings, and Section 1512 related to vote required to reject or modify final recommendations of Planning Commission, and to refer this matter to the Planning Commission for study and recommendation. Motion by Councilman Wis.; - Second by Councilman llalaasco. So ordered. Minutes 3/17/70 • March 30, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Mary A. Edgerton, City Clerk SUBJECT: General Municipal Election Arrangements have now been made with Toyota Motor Distributors, Inc.? Torrance, for computer processing of our election ballots on the evening of Tuesday, April 14, 1970. My Deputy City Clerk and I, with Mr. Dennis Dynes, Manager of Modernage, our election supplier, met with Mr. Rex Davison, National Data Systems Manager for Toyota Motors, on Monday, March 9, 1970 in order to discuss the computer program and handling of the ballot data. Our meeting was most satisfactory, and all details were considered in order to insure a smooth operation on April 14th. The Logic and Accuracy Boards, as required by law, have been selected to assist with election procedures, and arrangements have been made with Mr. William H. Berlin, Jr., Chief of Police, for a police officer and a car to transport our ballot cards and the necessary personnel to and from Toyota Motors on the night of the election, after the ballots have been received and inspected here at City Hall in the "Office of the Mayor". I remind the members of the City Council and the general public that if they desire to do so, they may view the ballot processing at Toyota Motors. It will be necessary for me, as City Clerk, to remain available at City Hall; however, the Deputy City Clerk will telephone me from Toyota Motors with the complete election results as soon as this information is available. The results will then be announced, and recorded on a blackboard in the foyer of the Council Chamber. No election results will be released at Toyota Motors. March 30, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Mary A. Edgerton, City Clerk SUBJECT: General Municipal Election - Appointment of Boards The procedures applicable for the use of the Votomatic vote recorders for this City's General Municipal Election on April 14, 1970, as approved by the State Commission on Voting Machines and Vote Tabulation Devices, calls for the appointment by the City Clerk of the following Boards, each Board to consist of not less than two properly deputized persons: Certification1paa - Check accuracy of computer program and of data processing equipment and certify run test before tabulation to certify that computer is ready to count ballots - follow entire processing of ballots - certify that ballots were counted accurately following test upon completion of count. Seal and Container Inspection Board - Receive and sign for ballot box from each precinct upon delivery to City Hall inspectseal, certify and deliver to Ballot Inspection Board. Ballot Insmtjara Board - Open inspected container and certify material. Deliver damaged: ballot cards for supervised duplication, and certify to identity of precincts whose ballots have been Inspected, number of damaged ballots, and that all were accurately duplicated - certify that a sheet of paper showing the number of ballot cards from each precinct is attached, and that the appropriate header cards are secured for proper identification. Deliver precinct ballot cards to Ballot Processing Board. Ballot Processing Board (properly deputized Toyota Motor Distributors, Inc. Data Systems Pcersonnel) - Preparation of necessary material for data processing system and operation of processing machine. Maintain log of sequence in which precincts are processed - certify that an accurate log has been maintained. Certify that all voted ballot cards are placed in package properly identified by precinct and that such package is turned over to Packaging and Storage Board. The precinct returns shall be kepi: under constant surveillance by a member of the Ballot Processing Board, who, at appropriate intervals, shall deliver them to City Clerk. Storage Pack$11.1gsatrs - Package all election material in temporary storage under surveillance of Ballot Processing Board until satisfactory completion of final accuracy test. Upon release by Accuracy Certification Board, sea/ containers in which ballot cards are to be stored, certify, and transfer to custody of City Clerk. Appointment of Boards -2- The following persons have consented to be deputized and to serve on the required . election boazds: Accuracy Certification.y!pard: John E. Stevens Robert Crawford Seal and Container Ins2ction Board: James :F. Weber Barbar Fleming Ballot Inspection Board: John E. Stevens Robert Crawford Ballot ProcessiAg Boa.cd: (Toyota Motors Data Processing Personnel) Art Garlock (Equipment Operator) Robert Boivert (Shift Supervisor) Storagicaang Board: Robert Crawford Barbara Fleming Pursuant to State of California Election Code Sections 15410 and 15670 through 15673, a minute action by the City Council calling for the appointment of these Boards is now respectfully requested. • April 2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mary A. Edgerton, City Clerk SUBJECT: City Clerks Conference The International Institute of Municipal Clerks, parent organization to the Southern California City Clerks Association, was formed in May of 1953, for the purpose of perpetualization of the organization as an agency for the vocational benefit of City Clerks. I am privileged to belong to both of these organizations, and I am also a member of the Education Committee for SCCCA. This committee is now in the process of establishing a long hoped for UCLA Institute for a continuing educational program for City Clerks in California. We feel that City Clerks should be the best -informed persons at City Hall because we come in contact with so many people who influence the future of our City. Due to the realization that the professional nature of the City Clerk's position is rapidly evolving, we are constantly urged by the League of California Cities to take advantage of the educational opportunities offered to us. And we like to do so! Those Clerics who are able to attend the IIMC yearly conference are very fortunate, and always return to their desks full of new ideas and enthusiasm. I know this to be true because 1 had the opportunity to attend the Conference held in California in 1967. I learned a lot. I would like very much to attend the IIMC Conference this year, and Lwould be happy to provide the funds for my own lodging a food and registration. I respectfully request authorization to attend the Annual Conference of the IIMC, to be held in Atlantic City, New jersey, from May 17 through 21, 1970, with necessary transportation allowed. - April 2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Increased Parking Fines Gentlemen:. We have a draft of the proposed ordinance declaring a certain area near the beach to have special significance as recreational area parking, thereby justifying a higher fine schedule. This ordinance has been requested by the City Council. We expect to have it in polished form by Tuesday even- ing, but one policy question will need to be resolved—what t's the area to be covered? Various alternatives are available, such as: a) Only the downtown commercial sections. b) The entire beach front, west of Beach Drive. c) Or west of the center line of Hermosa Avenue. dl Or including all of Hermosa Avenue and everything west. Or running even further up the hill. This subject needs some discussion at the meeting so that the proper descrip- tion can be inserted within the ordinance. Respectfully submitted, WESLEY O. MC DANIEL City Manager WCM:mm April 1, 1970 TO: Honorable .Mayorand Members of the City Council FROM: T. B Miraes.'oei City Attorney SUBJECT: • Riding Bicycles on Strand Walkway accordance with Councilman Belasco's suggestion, 1 have reviewed the Deed which dedicated the Strand Walkway to the City of Hermosa Beach from the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company. This Dedication includes the restriction that the Strand Walkway is dedicated as a "public pleasure ground" and is intended to prohibit forever the use of said pleasure or play ground for vehicles, trains or wagons, carriages, automobiles, and every other kind of conveyance, including cars of every kind. The specific language of the Deed would obviously prohibit the use of bicycles on the Strand, since a bicycle is in fact a vehicle, or kind of conveyance. On the other hand, the riding of bicycles for 'pleasure purposes is consistent with the dedication of the use of the property as a public pleasure ground and would se to be a reasonable interpretation. ? niethod to resolve any legal question concerning this matter would be to request the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company expressly to allow the riding or operating of bicycles for pleasure purposes on the Strand Iftralkway. For this purpose, 1 have attempted to locate the successors in interest to that company. On March 10, 1970,. we requested that the Office of the Secretary of Sate forward to us any information their records reflected concerning this company. On March 16, 1970, we received their reply stating that this coMpany was incorporated on October 26, 3900, and its corporate charter was suspended January 4, 1965, for failure topay franchise tares or license taxes. As a result of further inquiry, on March 30, 1970, Mr. Ralph R. Martig, Chief Counsel to ,:he Secretary of State, advised us that their ?as l: known address for the company is in Los Angeles: dating ,back to 1962. 1 have forwarded a letter to that address, and am presently awaiting a reply. In the meantime, it is my recommendation that the status quo be• maintained , as I would prefer first to contact the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company prior to the time of raising the issue. However, if it is the desire of the Council to amend the ordinance prohibiting bicycles cm the Strand at this tithe, 1 believe that it can legally be accomplished without serious jeopardy to the Dedication. JBM:bf • • April 2, 1970. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manage SUBJECT: Possible Land Trade Gentliamen: In recent weeks, we have had a couple of pAathninary discussions with vepre- Sentatives of the Baptist Church located on Manhattan. Avenue between Pier Avenue and 14th Eftsetet, concerning their improvement desires. From this has resulted an idea which may have merit :for everyone. Basically, the plan. would be for them to trade us this property, in exchange for land owned by the city of comparable value on First Street east of Pacific Coast Highway. In this way, they could build a new church, in a good locant tion, with adequate parking. And we could demolish their old building and . improve the property for parking, thereby removing the' primary drawback from occupancy of the Penny's block stores. Initially, they approached us to see If. we would jointly develop their unused land on Beach Drive for parking, to be used by both. In conversation, though, it developed that they had potential plans to improve the building, but gs age and condition made costs prohibitive Moreover,. it really isn't designed for their needs, and its commercial area location was wrong. In brief, they would be better off relocating. We, at the same time, own several large lots on the south side of First Street east of Pacific Coast Highway,, which the Telephone Company formerly leased for parking. However, they no longer need them, have dropped the lease, and don't contemplate renewing it. The lots are too far back for adding to the commercial depth on Pacific Coast Highway„ and are ideal for either R-3 use or a quasi -public use such as a church. Even the presence of Telephone Com- pany parking lots for Sunday use is good. Lately, several experienced commercial aeaLtors or experts have agreed that the lack of adjacent parking is the single greatest hindrance to occupancy of the vacant stores. Most have rear entrances which could be modified at reasonable cost. A parkin.g lot could be constateted at minimal cost„ metered, and attached to the existing one at 14th and Manhattan. The purpose of this memorandum is simply to inform the Council of this possi- bility and to request authorization to continue the explorations. Naturally, no actual steps would be taken nor moneys expended with further report to, and approval by„ your body. IC; row. 4•4•ss...-* oN. Respectfully submitted, /77 WESLE1' C. MC DANIEL t? 1k4A.n.Arrezi. SKETCH MAP POSSIBLE LAND TRADE rsi PAO:MI6 Let PVI; t :: O PENALYS N. S o HaPlos/4 Property not owned by church; should probably be acquired, or possibly vacant back half acquired or leased. m . �. • • April 2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Tennis Court Lights Gentlemen: As directed by the City Council, we have been continuing experiments with various shields in an attempt to block the glare from the new lights so that it will not reach windows on houses across Ardmore Avenue. Unfortunately, we have not yet met with the necessary level of success. The latest design is now in place on one light and vsse will have a picture of this to display at Tuesday's meeting. If it appears to work better, we will fabricate additional shields for the other offending lights in order to determine whether the total glare may be adequately reduced. We will provide a future progress report on this question at the next meeting. If it is impossible, even with the best shields that can be devised, to reduce the glare adequately --and this is a very real possibility—the City Council will be faced with a hard decision of deciding between the public use of public courts with the new night lighting measured against the inconvenience to one or more nearby private properties. It should be noted that we still stand ready to assist these property owners, even at city expense, in provid- ing acceptable screening mechanisms on their own windows. Respectfully submitted, WESLEY/ C. MC DANIEL City Manager WCM: mm Ap3ca 2, 1976 Mr, George Pennington 26 29th Street Hermosa Beach, California Dear Mr. Pennington: By the time that our agenda deadline closed today, for the Council agenda ©f April, 7, 1976, we had not received any communication from you, as promised, requesting City Council reconsideration of your pigeon permit. Therefore, we were not able to reserV a this for a place on the agenda. In view ©f all the time which has transpired and the various communica- tions which have taken piaoer I really have no recourse bit to assume that this situation is simply marking time by deliberate lack of action. Since the City Council has to fact denied the permit, the activity should have ceased some time ago and iaas only been continued though my acqui- escence in staying enforcement pending your request. 1 feel that I am •xnable to defer action any longer. Therefore, in, accordance with the City Council deo€ston previously expressed, you are forsrsaily requested to remove all pigeons other than the number permitted by ordin- ance within. two weeks from the date of this 1etterf and also to either remove the structure itseig or secure the necessary building permits and make any alterations revived thereunder. Y,. ti./M:mrn cc. City Connctl City Clerk Bidding Department Chief of Police Yours very truly' e 4V C."! 0-14441 V ESL , MC DANIEL City Manager March 31, 1970 TO: Civil. Service -Commission FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Reinstatement -- Leon Baker Gentlemen: As noted in the attached communication from the Chief of Police and letter from Mr. Baker's attorney, the charges upon which Mr. Baker was previously dismissed from service have been found invalid in a competent judicial setting. It is the opinion of the Chief of Police that his value as a police officer has not been impaired by this action, and the Chief proposes to reinstate him to duty at his prior status. Neither the Civil Service Ordinance nor the Personnel Rules and Regula- tions specifically cover the subject of reinstatements. The Rules and Regulations are totally silent on the question, and therefore do not apply. The City Attorney concurs in the following interpretation of position under the Civil Service Ordinance, by Section number: Section 2-38. This Section provide for a procedural series of written appeals subsequent to a dismissal action. It may be interpreted that the judgment may be reversed at any stage in the appeal procedure by either the Department Head, City Manager, or Appeals Board. It may also be interpreted that the demand for reinstatement in effect constitutes a written appeal of the dismissal action. .• Section 2-36 and 2-37. These sections generally provide the intent framework within which the Department Head and City Manager are presented a mandate to act on personnel matters with "full free- dom" in providing "fair and just approach" to personnel transactions. After reviewing the legal impact of our procedures, the equity of the appeal demand, and the judgment of the Department Head, I concur in the request of the Department Head that this individual be reinstated. Accordingly, we are taking action to reinstate Officer; Bakers effective April 1, 1970, with no loss in senority or other perquisites. This is an administrative action within the bounds of the Civil Service Ordinance, and this memorandum is transmitted to the Civil Service Commis- sion for information only purposes. Respectfully subm WCM:mm WESLE., C. MC DANIEL cc: Mr. Leon Baker, John Cheroske GUS/ Manager Chief Berlin, City Clerk, City Council, City Treasurer, Finance Director. April 6, 1970 TO Vesley C. MoDaniel City Manager FROM: aohn B. Stevense Mrw.tor of PUblic Works SUBancT: Release of Lein - 1236 - 20th Place On Ilay 15th 1964 this office accepted a iein onbehalf of the cityp from Eurepedis K. and Madeline Nicolau against property located at 1236 - 20th Placeo in lieu of the requirement for construction of curbd .sidewalk along the property. frontage. The owner has completed the required improvements and requests a release of the lien by the City. The attached gesolution authorizing the release of•lien has been prepared. it is reqaested that this It'esolution be brought before the City Council for their approval. JOHN E. STEIMNS / Director of Pdblic Works JESOI FkISSOLUTXON NO. N. S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CM' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS A,NGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORMING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF EIERIVIOSA BEACH TO SIGN ON BEHRLF OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH A RELEASE OF LIEN ON REM, PROPERTY. THE Cal' COUNCET, OF THE CITY OF YIERMCSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HERZBY RESOLVE AG FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Council of the City of Hermosa Beach authorizes the Mayor to sign a Release of Lien attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, said lien, being claimed by the City of Hermosa Beach upon the following described property, to wit: Lots 105 106,, WaLter Ransom Co Redondo Hone Tract an per map recorded in Book 9 Page 57 of Mpg) i the 02fice of, the County Recorder of said Warty. • -• Also kliaM72 an L236 • 2rAtit Piace,„ ilermostgp, Beach, Eurepedis K. and Madeline Mcolau; owners. . SECTION 2. The City Mork shall attast to the execution of the Release of Mora and cause the same along with a certified copy of this Resolution Lo be recorded in the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. SECTION 3 The City Clark shall ce ify to the pasgage and adoption of this Resolution and it shall be in ilTirftediette force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED thin day of - ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 01.1.120.11, X9 . CM!' OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA • cm CI,ERK CITY ATTORNEY Mayor 6838 6839 6840 6841. 6842 6843 6814 6845 6846 6847 6848 6849 6850 685. 6852 6853 6854. 6855 6856 6857 6858 6859 6860 6861 6862 64=3' 6864 6865 6866 6867 6868 6869 6870 6873. 6872 6873 6874 6875 6876 6877 6878 6879 6880 6883. 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 DEMANDS AND WETS - April 7s, 1970 Issued to: ABCO Disposal - Trash Disposal from City Yard Advanced Electronics = Radio Maintenance Alco Chemical Park Supplies All American Uniform Remo Uniform Allowance American Rubber o Pyre Hose for Fire Dept. Ancorp Nat Service - Stationary Supplies Angelus Chevrolet o Public Works Equipment Armor Elevator Co. a Monthly Billing Bank of Ameria: `'Civic Center Lease - lease Agreement Bank of. America - Customer Billing Service Bell. & Howell. Ditto Ditto Pasters Mill , H. Berlin Jr. o Auto Supplies BlVdc Body Shop Repair to Police Unit George PO Cake -. Supplies for Recreation D9pt...:.... Calif. Meanie Treasurers Assn. 4 Registration Application Callaghan & Company 4 Revised Publication Center Line Company - Traffic Paint Void Certifies Office Equipment Repair Type writer Coast Chrysler Plymouth - Auto Service Police Be Coast Disposal Co. m Monthly Billing RichardRichard Corabest:. A Uniform Allowance Contractor Suppliers o Saw RQ it Cnty Sanitation o Dist. _ Monthly Billing Crown Coach Corp. - Services Rendered for Fire De H. G. Daniels Co. Office Supplies Bill i; Davis Uniform Allowance Design & Environment - Subscription Doxy ° s Miler Shop o Auto Supplies for Police De Eddings Bros. _ . Monthly Billing . Tarr A. Edgerton - F tpenao Edward Bros. Cleaning Material Enk Tire . Parker = Marker for Police Dept. Calif. St. College Foundation - Services 2/74421,28 1970 General Telephone Bell & Z,ts d Monthly Billing General Te]ey one - Monthly Billing Eduard ::Ma's= :`: - Services Rendered Goodhew Ambulance Service = Ambulance Service Poli:ce''°Deptd Guideposts 4 Subscription Pat Hammer Agency. - Services Rendered Harron, Ricked & McCons - Public Works Supplies Hes Co. Drinking Fountains Parks Dept. Herald EXaminer - Advertising Hermosa Beach School Dist. - Use of Bus Hermosa Plower Shop - Services Rendered HowardP etele raft - Freight Charges _. Industrial Control Systeme Services Rendered Kee Lox Co. -.Office Suppl.i.es, . Kellogg Supply Co. " Supplies for Park Dept. Lawndale Cs nneretc Products Co. Supplies for Public Works Livingston .Graham - Monthly Billing Lococo's s Pie bhau'ta•n Beach - Beautification Awards Dinner Long Beach Uniform Company - Revised Codes Los Angeles Times o Advertising Richard L. Ms4den o Servs es REmdn ed ?anhettan Car. Mash - MonthlF Bill i fig, May Tool - Repair Equipment Micky De U ca ;essen - Meals for Prisonees AMO t. $ 170.30 40.00 96.01 200.60 1,580.54 6.30 49206.83 34.025 29666.67 :].14•-T 21.83 19.76 25.00 84.00 25.00 28.88 138.86 106.64 29.22 69315.20 100.00 8.00 109.72 63.42 5.15 100.00 12.00 92.00 121.78 11012 29.99 491 3800 37.10 19666.08 80.00 mow 7.50 200.00 52.1.6 39038 32.40 14..99 15.75 42.94 70.50 70.31 85.41 89.08 158.38 125.75 7.88 77.84 105083 6.25. 67.45 2 54. 82 DEMANDS Alp WARRANTS April 7s 1970 (Continued) Issued to: 6896 Mobil Oil Corp. - Credit Card Purchases 6697 Motorola Communications & Electronics Ind, m Radio Eq. 6898 Osborne, I emper, Thomas, Inc. G Services Rendered 6899 Oxford Chemicals Cleaning Supplies 6900 Pacific Flagstone Co. - Public Works Supplies 6901 Palos Verdes Blueprint - Monthly Billing 6902 Ken Par Leasing - Leasing Contract 6903 Pasadena Map Co. - Street Atlas 1970. Edition 6904 J. C. Penny Co. Yearly Contract 6905 Postmaster Office Supplies 6906 Postmaster - .Stamps 6907 R & S Garage ; :Services Rendered 6908 Regents UCL `- Conference 3/31 4/2/1970 6909 Realty Tax Service - Monthly Billing 6910 Red Star :tae;.. 3ovakar a Wiping Rags 6911 Paula 'CO' Rugg cervices Rendered 2/17 to 3/7 1970 6912 Savin Basi ss: Machines = Fper Supply 6913 Savin Diversified Leasing o Lasing Contract 6914 Jon L. Sehaaaollc - Uniform Allowance 6915 Sears • : Roebuck '& Co. Yearly Contract 6916 Savours Jewelers a Hermosa Beach C. 6917 So Bay Brake & Wheel Auto Service 6918 So Bay Daily Breeze Advertising ising 6919 So.Bsy Hospital o Services Rendered 6920 So . y Office Supply - Office Supplies 6921 So Bay •Publishing = Legal Advertising 6922 So California, Edison - Monhiy Billing 6923 So California;Edison - Monthly Billing 6924 So California Gas - Monthly Billing 6925 Southwestern Electric Co. ; Flourecent Imps Public Wks. 6926 State Educationsl Agency = Supplies Public Works.. 6927 Supreme Paint Co. - Paint for Public Works 6926 Superior Wholesale Electric - Supplies Public Works 6929 Taylor's: ant fi' eturing Co. - Supplies Auto Police ' De 6930 3M Busine s Products - Office Supply Monthly Bim 6931 Quenan L.:Tslen - Semple Ballots 6932 Traffic Appl an e; - Meter Equip. Pub1l,c Works6933 J. C. ?fuer & SAP, = Public Works Equipment 6934 H I Tullis o Ogen Supplies 6935 Twin Auto Detail - Car Wash Services 6936 West Advertising = Lettering of Police Vehicles 6937 Western Highway Products Inc. Signs 6938 Western Surplus - Gun Supplies 6939 Richard J. Ziporlin - Services Rendered. 6940 Shell Oil Co,,....-. Contract 6941 Gen Tel Op Sha ox - Contract 6942 Ronald S. Barg n. - Postage for Questionnaire &. Facptnees. 6943 Postmaste • : •:Annual Fee per it 6944 USC Public Admin Enrollment Fee 6945 George Kopp i• Services Rendered 2/13/70 6946 John Terr nioa:-..Services Rendered 3/13/70 6947 Dorothy Robertson - Services Rnd. 3/5/70 6946 Renne Taylor :- Services Rendered 2/23/70 6969 Ted Wegener Services Rendered ? 26/70 u Amount $ 30.88 3.,,036.60 251.12 23436 32.55 38.03 909.40 8.90 18089 36.45 120.00 79.88 60.00 25.00 36.50 200.00 180.00 35.57 100.00 216.34 47025 98.45 51.82 52.50 156.03 75.50 7830.39 422.03 137.23 81.50 40011 20.20 91.83 131.78 159.75 311.367 1231.04 17.64 16.50 130.00 65049 88.82 175000 582096 42.31 41.10 60.00 1,159.00 50.00 50.00 63.00 200.00 100.00 • DEMANDS AND WARRANTS - April 7, 1970 (Continued) Issued to: Amount 6950 Bill Lee - Services Rendered 2/25/70 3/20/70 $ 48o00 6951 Pacific Athletic Supply - Supply Recreation Dept. 56.77 6952 Triangel Hardware - Supplies Public Works 29.71 6953 Learned Lumber - Monthly Billing 481.64 6954 Maurice Denn - Drawings for Police Dept. . 900o00 6955 Mn R. Stonier - Pett Cash 130.57 6956 Merritt Hardware - Monthly Billing 208.91 6957 Sterling Home 1iectroni©s - Speaker Equip. Police Dept. 40.54 6958 Inglewood Whsle - Ceiling Equip. Police Dept. 31.20 6959 Pioneer. Materials - Supplies Police Dept. 52.78 6960 Standard Brands Paint - Paint Police Dept, 2749 6961 Neu Pacific Lumber - Lumber Police Dept, » 712.49 6962 American Sprinkler - Equipment for Parks Dept. 196.57 6963 Barnes Delaney = Parks Supplies 94.42 6964 Alhambra Foundry - Equipment Public Works 17.33 6965 Title Ins€, 4F, Trust - Title Search 80.00 6966 Public Employee's Retirement System - Contract 102.00 4%29805.82 • • NON END&ITEMtS -- INFORMATION - With Agenda for April 7, 1970 Police Department - Monthly R port - February, 1970. 130p.a_I)ep�'r_tment „Repo,- February, 1970. Vehicle Parking District - Months=R - February, 1970. The following items are available from the Offfice of the City Clerk: 11-1 Strategic Aircraft Contract - Resolution of El Segundo Woman's Club, urging award of contract to best qualified Southern California Company. Termination of Unproductive 09.E i.P..a - Resolution of City of Signal Hill requesting legislation. Mid Year SalmA.diustments for Personnel of t SheriffQs peparEment and Fire l??e_pp l t - Resolution of City of Covina urging reconsideration by Board of Supervisors, Transmittal Notice - __m__cation. y P i is Telephone and Teiec ' h Com ►any to PUC -- Authority to increase and decrease =Min intrastate rates and charges applicable to telephone service furnished within State of California. MEETINGS AND OTHER _EVENTS: Candidates Forum - Thursday, April 2,. 1970 - Pier Avenue Auditorium - 8 p.m. Lease of California Cities a - ThB. rsday,R April 2 - Rodger Young Auditorium - 6:30 p.m. Chamber of Commerce 0. House - Friday, April 3 - 432 PCH - 3 to 7 p.m. Little L g O,penino� C-�ame of Sem - Friday, April 3 - Clark Stadium - 5:30 p.m. Plannine� Commission - Monday, April 6 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Cati7 C©tat cil — Tuesday, April 7. - Council Chamber - Joint Meeting with Improvement Commission, 6:30 p.m. - Regular Meeting - 7:30 p.m. South Bay Sanitation Dis€rict - Wednesday, April 8 - Los Angeles - 2 p.m. Board off Appeal2 - Wednesday, April 8 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. InfQr�-Cit�r NFgh , Committee -- Thursday, April 9 -- Lawndalo - 6:30 p.m. I,m rovement Comtszi _ Thursday,, April 9 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Board o9 gaai _ Ffd'B�stBnent - Mondays., April 13 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. MUNICIPAL ELECTION - Tuesday, April 14 -- 7 a. m. to 7 p.m. • '2.:."i,•-:,-..-;.:' •;....,::„':;:.. .„''...-•:;: -,,,,,s-•• - .'„ .• ,,•• •—„......7•...i!:•,,,' ":•-'?-,-.-'..',:',„!.;".:,...,,,'„.:. - '-'''.„,''',,,'-',E''..::•.!:„.•,',.'2,',,,•'' "?:7::,'-',. - ''''' - -'..,:•.:. -, :.;:---:•.`1',.;;,-. :•:"'„.::::,:-1!::::!.1-.:'-.r,,;-:-:-- ,:l.'..,,,',-„-,;• ''''' ''. --':•.',-"'','''''''.2.;'•,:' ....- •.;:„77.:.;::,::,,,./.;:::-,;' ' .,'..',-: r.'• "' ' ' '.. '.'1".::::;---,:,:',';',..,.•., ''''',.. -''',:'''...'...' :•:.:::;:‘-':'',7''.". -.- ''-' -.;,:,.i.....' .7.:•:',...,,, ,•:-!..•'....--..:. .i.f.,•.„'„::„;„;;:,'.•:;,,„:::-..„'„,:, -:„.*•.•,•7. •..-'.?. ':„..:,„.":,:f„n•: „ :• •.'',..T.•.-1. i ..„ -,..-.,..''..i...$1;:-.'.,:-,:.•••„,-..',,V-. .,:-•.'"*.:2„;:',.. :.• ::':,'„-;-:,;,'•-•- „.,`.'-'::-....-''-.7.:'''''..H....,.;„ : ''.:.--, ',.:- . ': ' '-..'''''''' '''''';':'''''::„...' '' ''';':' .t:'-a:r.„ ',„:1 -.•::,:;'-'2,-:, -.',- '. ' ,' ,:.„.„,„,-.'-'.'„Y:,..:.1,1,•''.:- ::,:i::.: ;i:::.,•:,-,:.;.,,•• --., .: ''':).f.•••:'",„...„''''''.:. ;:•••• j:•,.:;•. -'.-"'--.."....*'4':-, '-::-.....' : ''.;:.',''..•:-„'...: ....-:,- ..- .,,,'...•;:i.„'"'..1-: -:. •••• ',,.:::...„.;.:.T.' . :. — . . . , .... . . . ... „.•.---;'....'. t'..- ;,-.),-.;.,...„'•„'.,',. -,, ..,:, , ' .„,':::': :'. -,," -..„.. -.,..:1:'•-. . 7: 7i•,:', i•: :; .-,..„(..-,.....-:', ' :„'' •,;:•:, . -:- ;-',. -„:;!: ' '''' -. -4,4i. ... ' - . ,..„, . . _ ...... ,. .. . 7,„ .:••••••:'',,;:•;;i.:,5„.:'.7-,.;::"..;;''*.,„„.. ':::'.„ . ,If ::7,,,- , i.::',:i'.‘..' :: ' .. .;: ..,:. ' ':,',.:: : ' . •‘..1:1;,::,.'':,..'.':',-1 • '',-. -.‘, = - ,., , :. .. . •; .1!• .., ....-,. - •• ' •1••••• , „ „ *-•:„•• •-• • . Department uel,a.•`+r+ewcai M,.-,nzhiy •Rep t • ,u+ it rig.t Plan++fg PERMIT No tdu -%(?rmi is f.1eCtrL. P i umb i ng " 3a t4isc. Plein Check Planning Comm. Variances ZOnc Ame�(n��dme n t s j R p womputa comm. t r:l+ec t i on t;st Mnith 1i,is this Veer This hiooih 1 st r4 + NSPE.0 I PINS to dice 26 4 15 10 1 , 6 5 1g a1 at '& 39 7116 M 16$ lest yc to d 30 2 Year 6 rg ins . ins+)Hrs. inf��. t t�•P Q, Pluinvia9 25 $ 54 i 1 ,ctr#c&l • 26 ,. Sdi� �E�TAL Zoning info & inspect. ++ violations ids. info. & inspect. i; zone vikI . " & zone i ngp . Condemnations Comm. inspect. rpec. Residential i mm „ m 1@ 3' CRAND TOTAL 1 a 50 152 ig 1 420 VO 39.' ' 406 172 169 20 SI 16 144 66 IS 71 77a 765 1 15 Misc 2 8 1$ t 2 49, 2 $ E0 55 51 141 4 7, �4� @ @805 6 5 25 10 7 ,N CHECK. HOURS FEL? .:1(219 permit s a'' u mi) i ng Pian Check Planning Coes Variance Zone Amend. ��yy pp dSte' bFd0♦ rePals Comm. i nsottc t Mise. 161 SS 1401 kat. 515.44 409.00 £t. tyALJATIQinS PrONE CALLS r -OR MONTH 50.00. 005.4 72 E S0119. s 50616.14 150.00 05 43 23 30 123 I t» Illi► 32 92 1471 17L 1473 '14 447.90 10729.20 $0i. Ste12.00 .56 7•45S40 7$d,p .73* 288Ro$57$/92.00 $60.45 6.00 at 9`•'ii• 1124 (tells . (IS worMmt 4e -s) bide. 592; Etna 376t general 356 • - t UK' •• • tx... J. C; • 1:00131.• C 3 Va: CSIsfr5. Irk7 • • mo."1.4,....s • • • .1Z21; 999 .99999 r Orr. • • , . : ,414! F ffe RUMY 70 Fioaal Year 1969-70 • $ 311.20 $ 207.41 $3,784.12 $ 3,465.33 , 89 .76 R 227.71ay 374-4,42 I. 21,4790 dt(f, , Pe 242. •.`::••••••^ •-• •19 ..71:01,7.1••••* rt. ran .07„ 321 710_ _ *. 34-4 779 4 x23_ 4 -i.03;W:13:. 4.04i1A0#04.4 , • 4_ s.9r • ••••••••••M•rdr.r. • 4.. 01 .0t.f •••*.•••,-, r.cro rr,r• . • ..•••••,y..' @. 4213P. • ke A 87sL 92X,e, (14^1 : • 17 - . 4.541-i .t Plods", . • V., . :7 ..••• rtzlt.t..:..1 • . :4: T..; • >.-r:.=; 566.77 i$ e.:806Lei$22e232.6M CA.,9,231.7E 217 235 • : .7.7 7. •! TAT.. BVSTI.r7 NOV -21.r.i7p‘ ,-;.):2 tr.,v.nows . . — i()WP Cr44,11 xotixt.r.) : N-,:5 7. F I PAhr,..ral VC- saw „ 01.11.r;ST6 Of 646 (1) eq: ”f4r7b2 _ $L •s• A.43,75 4.0 .Q.,911 TOG 00 goo.00 4.4.0 f,le 250..00 L'gsk • 76x ,1".rt=x;rtr • ' • ;•-•-•,.z° 'POTAL - UWAIntil AV=0.11 'P' 9 , . - ." . 11- OE I •L"V.Glig.. . .i. Aii.' 4 V,lifil . -1, ' . - . . • i . l'ir .4;R .13..610.6 i . ., it49•91gi..,g1.5 6 03%. ;71 4; ,a w1.11.91,_ / git !b !?-L .AZ0 -$ e'21 $42 3.564 $41( 27R4f •