Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/19/70A :. , - g4.4.k , CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 AqEpA, e CITY_CgUNCIL.MEETING --- Tuesday, May 19, 1970 Council Chamber - City Hall Work Session - 7E00 p.m. Civic Center Regular Meeting - 7E30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Adjourned Meeting, May 5, 1970; Regular Meeting, May 5, 1970. 1. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE - 731-737-739 Twenty -First Street, Single Family Residential with Commercial Potential to Multiple -Family Residential - Resolution P.C. 154-771 - James Fuciler 2. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL - BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCE ALLOWING 6' FENCE, 622 LONGFELLOW AVENUE - B.Z.A. Resolution 154-18 - Douglas O. Sniffen. 3. NON -AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS - City Council. 4, REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES: Immygment Commission (a) Letter of Resignation - dated May 2, 1970, from Mrs. Betty Ryan, 532 Pine Street. (b) Request for Leave of Absence - dated May 1, 1970, from Mr. Don Murray, Post Office Box 272, Hermosa Beach. (c). Terms of Office. PianninaeggeStEE.322a (d) Report on Proposed Ordinance amending provisions of Zoning Ordinance - Re Final Decisions of City Council. 5. COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC: (a) Reclaimable Refuse - Letter dated May 40 1970 from Mrs. Roger Schaefer, 1460 - llth Street, Manhattan Beach. Cb) Proposed Pier Avenue Name Change - Letter dated May 12, 1970 from V. W. Maynard, American Rental Leasing Co., 840 Pacific Coast Highway. (c) 9jtion to Wordingof StaffR.epot - Letter dated May 14, 1970 from Mr, J. B. Scbmolle, 931 Montgomery Drive. 6. NON -AGENDA ITEMS FROM AUDIENCE - Fifteen Minute Discussion Period. 7. REQUEST FOR BUSINESS LICENSE - DELIVERY OF ADVERTISING MAIL Letter dated May 6, 1970, from N. G. Packard, Administrative Vice President, American Postal Corporation, 7.354 Bolsa Avenue, Westminster. 8. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL: (a) Edwards Bros. Community Market, 526 Pier Avenue - Person to Person Transfer - Off Sale Beer & Wine - Aven G. and Mack H. Edwards, Victor C. Dutton. (b) 2626 Hermosa Avenue - Person to Person Transfer - On Sale General - Eating Place - Melvin Hochman. mil A (J24+ --t4411 0,xla 6.) City Council Agenda - May 19, 1970 -2- 9. REFUSE CONTRACT - Preliminary Report re Proposals Received - opened 2:00 p.m. on Friday, May 15, 1970. 10. CODIFICATION - ORDINANCE NO. M. S. 384 - Codifying Ordinances Nos. H. S. 357 and N. S. 376 - Introduced May 5 1970 - For adoption. 11. TRAFFIC CONTROL - STOP INTERSECTION, PIER AVENUE WIT} MONTEREY BOULEVARD, VALLEY DRIVE AND ARDMORE AVENUE - Proposed resolution amending Resolution No. N. S. 2435. 12. WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM, 1970 - Proposed resolution declaring existence of certain nuisances and ordering abatement thereof. 13. MISCELLANEOUS REPORT - City Manager: (a) Letter of Resignation - dated May 11, 1970, City Manager James F. Weber. (h) Letter of Resignation - dated May 14, 1970, Public Works John E. Stevens. (c) Vehicle Parking District Matters. 14. CITY TREASURER MATTERS: (a) Deputy City Treasurer - Appointment of Mrs. (b) City Treasurers Report - April, 1970. 15. DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. from Assistant from. Director of Marie Betoone. ADJOURNMENT - to Regular Adjourned Meeting, 7:00 p.m., WedAlgIns_ilmne 3, 1970. (Primary Election - Tuesday, June 2.) C Y Dear Sirs 4-21-70 Medbers of Hermosa Beach City Council and Whomsoever That This Appeal May be D recttd Tot My name is James V. Fuci1e.. y application for a zone change at 731-737 and 739 -- 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, was denied 4-20-70. wish to have a hearing on this matter at your next session or at your convenience. 'hank you. Sincereiy'o /s/ James V. FUcile Date . Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Gentlemen: On April 20, 1970, The Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach, denied a request of James 1Fucile, for a change of land use zone classification from R-1 with C potential, to R-3 on Iota 20, 21 & 22, Hermosa View Tr ct #1, located at -731, 737 - 739 - 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, under provisions of Article 15 of the City Zoning C,r ii,ance N. S. 1S4 as =mended. As a resident of Hermosa Beach for many years, I reject the invasion of speculative builders into the R-1 zones, as there are plenty. of R-3 lots available in this city. The single family residents in the neighborhood are very upset, and I can't blame them. Because of the existing apartments in this area, the. parking problem is almost intolerable. Z u Ito/ j. 0 I ,t. • Rea Fucile Appeal The foregplas.120_12tIsEso received from: E. E. Harris, 2201 Pacific Coast Highway - datdd May 12, 1970; Emil S. and Sadir Micu, 2424 Ardmore Avenue - dated May 11; Francis Garner - dated May 7; Margaret Kemp; Ed T. Ahmed, 2205 Pacific Coast Highway - dated May 9; Mr. and Mrs. L. Holmes, 739 - 21st Street; G. Vanderpool, 742 - 24th Street; Anne and I. P. Schjeldahl, 701 24th Street - May 11; Helen and Francis A. Carney, 730 - 24th Street - May 9; Mrs. E. G. Bissinger, 630 - 24th Street - May 11; Mrs. Jo Hilliard; Kenyon C. Burch, 1909 Springfield Avenue - May 9; Mrs. Vincent R. Lawlor, 1922 Springfield Avenue ... May 11; Myra and W. S. Biumenstock, 1852 Rhodes Street - May 9; John C. and Myrna E. Sams, 1087 Monterey Boulevard - May 11; Stella and Herbert Lamb, 701 - 21st Street - May 10. This letter was also received, with the following_comments added: "A point that has not been recognized by most people is the following: If Hermosa Beach and other beach cities persist in encouraging the building of apartment house structures, street traffic on the limited highways in this area will become intolerable. It will only be a matter of time before the State builds a freeway through the area, which as you well know, will be the demise of the small business man in these areas. Yours truly, Mr. and Mrs. J. P. Jessee, 662 - 25th St." "The apartments that have already been constructed in this area are definitely of very poor taste. They have caused a miserable parking problem by building so many units on such a small area of land. Hermosa Beach is a beautiful city and can be kept this way just by listening to our zccaolana2 rejection of some ideas. Sincerely, Janis Adams, 613 - 24th Street." • • Fucile Appeal - Letters from Public -2- "I heartily agree with what is written here and believe we should uphold the decision of our Commission. Sincerely, John F. Sullivan." "I hope the Council will recognize the wishes of long-time residents in this home community and deny the request of James Fucile. Mrs. William Mathews, 37 - 9th Street." "Dear Sirs% I wish to add my voice as a tax payer, to the above objection. I attended the meeting at which all you elected and other candidates spoke. As with one voice you promised no higi rise apts. to spoil liermosa. In this location it would be a distinct disadvantage. No proper parking space - cutting of views of old residents and other things which a big apartment house would bring to the area. Please consider all this as you vote. Remember your promises. :.Tge do- Yours truly, (Mrs.) Lucy K. Proudfoot (Mrs. John L. Proudfoot) A home owner, too - 347 - 31st St." "Also; although it should not affect me too much, but where will the extra cars park for the people renting the new apartments on Ardmore near Pier? The street is too narrow for traffic now, without the load of parked cars. What is the Planning Commission doing regarding extra parking in ail areas? Each dwelling (including apartments) should be required to plan for two off-street parking places. Sincerely, (Mrs.) Bertha Craft, 1942 Springfield Avenue." "In these last City Council campaigns all I have heard is how Hermosa wants to become a family town and yet what is being done to accomplish this. In our area we have more than our share of apartment houses and now there is a possibility of still another. Where does the interest of the family homeowner come in. True every city has apartment houses but here in Hermosa they seem to be in more residential areas. At least in Manhattan and Redondo there seems to be some plan whereby same residential areas are free of this. Their mpartment houses are more or less in a few areas, so apartment dwellers are in similar areas. Putting apartments in any.area seems haphazard to me. We already have two apartments on our block and the results of that have been bad enough. How can you take pride in Hermosa or your home when renters could care less and act accordingly. A street cannot be well kept unless everyone takes pride in it and right now this is hard when you have people who throw all sorts of things on your property and park wherever they wish. Just to put an apartment house up and not consider the wishes of the homeowners, without whom this town would never make it, is drastic and very disappointing to me. Yours truly, Jay A. and Corinna Myhins, 649 - 21st Street. • • EmiltbmgaL=Agditional Form Letters Received 5/14/73: Rev. Richard 1. S. Parker - May 13, 1970; Mr. and Mrs. Colvin Nelson - May 13, 1970; Mrs. Mary Burke, 612 - 21st Street - May 11, 1970; Mr. and Mrs. Ray Deffenbaugh, 62J - 10th Street; Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence R. Adams, 613 - 24th Street - May 13, 1970; Dolores and Ramon Valenzuela, 717 - 24th Street - May 12, 1973. COPY Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach, Calif. Gentlemen:: 5/13/70 As a resident of Hermosa Beach for 13 years, I am greatly concerned over the slow change of many residential areas into apartment zonings. Our streets were not planned to handle additional traffic and the resulting congestion is bad. Please reject any change in zoning on 21st St - particularly Lots 20, 21, 22, Hermosa View Tract #1 located at 731, 737, 739 21st St. Consider the single family residents. Let the speculative builder find R-3 lots, already so classified. Sincerely, /s/ (Mrs.) Marian E. Dooley 631 - 24th St. 11 May 1970 Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach, California 90254 G€nt 1 est : On April 20, 1970, the Planning Commissions of Hermosa Via;, dented d t0.00ast Oi .Tames Fucile, for a change of land use zone classification from R-1 with C potential, to R-3 on lotto 20, 21 22, Hermosa View Tract 0,, iacated at 731, 737 - 739 - 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, under provisions of Article 15 of th City Zoning Ordinance N.S. 154 as amended. As a resident of Hermosa Peacki for many year;„ -I reject t 1�: of speculative builders into the k-1 zones, as4: diem arra plenty of M-3 lots available in this city. The Bingle family residents in the.neighborhood are vat upset, amd I can't i'lam these. Because of the existing apartments in this arse, the perking problem is almoaat intolerable. I live on 24th Street, the neNt street up the hill from the "subject" lots, and as it is, 1 am continua/1y finding peoples care parked in front of and blocking my garage. Adding to the density a f this area would only add to an already existing problem. Hy home, located directly behind the "subject" late was built to incorporate the fantastic view which looks out over these (mor R'1) lots.' Many other home here on 24th Street feature the Baum theme. If this sono ch ,O Wes Lb 611l0int a 36 unit apartment building to go up, my view will be totally destroyed. Other's vim will be lessened, which will result in as general downgrading of the misting archi.tectna,l use of rainy homes here on 24th Street. If commercial zoning is allowed, then parking and service areas to new businesses will add to the city of Hermosa Beach without destroying maw peoples property themes. Hermosa heath can be a beautiful well balanced community with attractive "view theme" living as well as apartment living, but only if "ca eftsal" planning is given. I ark you to allow me to continue a pleasant resideues hero, enjoying my breath- taking view, while safety, on already crowd ,streets is saistaihed. In closing, 1 would like to commend the City Planning Commission on its prudent and quality decision. $50,000 is a lot oi? Bey to pay for a city 0414, -only to ignore a t . Respectfully, (=Kr. fns Mrs. Joseph C. I'iundaay 740 24th Street Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • • way 119 1970 . Hermosa Beach City Council Hermsa Beach,- California ' Gentlemen: • Oa April 20, 1970, the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach,. denied a request of James Puoile, for a shange of land uae zone classification from R-1 with C potential, to R-3 04 lots 20,21 & 229 Hermosa !tiTract 01, lo e ted at 7319 7379 739 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, under provisions of Article 15 of the City Zoning Ordi `A an e N.S.154 as ammended. Aa a resident of Hermosa Beach for manyyears •1 reject the invasion. of speculative buildare•tuto the R-1 zones, s there are plenty of R.3 10 available ia this -city. . • The single family residenta in the neighbor-. hood are very apset, ;And 1 saie- blame them. -Because of the existing aparta-mto in this area the parking problem to intolerable. The eity spent $40,000 for &. survey to plan for the futUre. The above lots .were zoned 0 P rpotential ix order to xivthe boulevard lots yadditional depth for future uee. _If this Some change' is allowed to go tilru, it will make all . ( .the boulevard lots between 2Ist and 24th streets \inadequate for -future development. Please give.this your utmost oomoiderati a. Simeerely (4ciVi P fig4ce-ex>4 -10 • Pa (-7 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, HERMOSA. BEACH, ON MONDAY, APRIL *,-0, 1970, AT 7:30 P. M. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7;35 P. M. BY CHAIRMAN NOBLE. ROLL. CALL - Present: Comm. Collis, MuMngenr,-"Watters and Chaiman Absent: Comm. Himmel, Stabler, Toole. Motion by Comm. Collis, seconded by Comm. M-uhfinger to approve the minutes of the April 6, 1970 meting. Resolution P. 0, 154-770 A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach denying- the request of Elyse Aehle, et al, for a change °f iend use zone from to R-2 on pro- . perty located in the 2100 bock of Loma DyiN Comm. Watts moved, seconded by Comm. MuXfinger to accept Resol,ution P. C. 154-770. AYES: Comm. Collis, Mulfinger, Waiters and Chairman Noble. NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Himmel, Stabler, Toole: Z-70--1 .Continued Request of jamesPi.xcl.le-fxr a change of land use zone classification from R-1 with C potential tic) R-3 on lots 20, 21, 22, Hermosa View Tract No. 1, located at 731, 737, 7:59. 21st S' -let., Hetinosa Beach, under pgovisions of Article 15 of City Zoning Ordinance N. S. 154, as amended. City Planner Crawford said that the Commission had received reports from the Fire; Chief and Police Chief indicating that the change of zone itself would not increase any existing hazards, although it was felt that two parking spaces per apartment was essential for the safety of the neighborhood. Mr. Crawford displayed three maps indicating the ,wotest,s, existing zone and. equested zone. He said the protests were based on congested parking on 21st Street from the existing apart- ment, house complexes and the ,nre-:-;ponsibili.l.y of the tr.L;aovits in these units. Comm. Mulfinger V:ktea tha .f.A.tv zoned the area C potential. Mr. Crawford said it was done in 1956 in cder to encourage commercial development. Since this has not developed, it is now felt that apartment buildings, could be acceptable. • • -2- Public hearing opened: 7:45 p. Mic. Francis Camev, 730 - 24th Street, presented photographs o$ Spxingfield Street showing congested paxking due to the present aoaLtmemt house. Comm. Collis asked Mr. Carry which h telt was more &stable, an apartment complex �•a commercial development, ar.A Mr. (Jamey favored commercial. Mr,, H., R. Besant, 2207 Pacific Coast Highway9 feit that if the lots were used •Zor an apartment coinplex, the remaining lots. on Pacific Coast Highway would not be deep enough for the eventual comthercial development which the City had panned. Mr. George Yorg, Realtor, 1026 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Manhattan Beach° Spoke in favor of the builfolina, saying that it vt7ould, cot in excess of one -hall million dollars, have two parking spaces peg: unit, elevators, recreation area, pool, landscaping and in the fr,cnt of the building, nine additional parking spaces vsyould be psovided on the stet foR. guest parking He said the building would attract pro- fessional people and bear a tax load of $14,000 to $17,000 a year. He rebutted the arguments about congestion, parking problems, impxoper usage of propeeor, commer- cial zoning, and vested inteests of ne,ighbc.,ing property owner. Mr. Jack Chernov„ Af:ohitect, 5274 W,. Pico Boulevad, Is Angeles,: 90019, ex pained the Quality of the proposed building, tandem parking and parkina machines; lecognized the parking pmblem existing in the neighborhood, and in.vited everyone to visit similar apaytme,nt developments which he had designed in other areas. Besant commented that often planned I'm- rk.ing spaces are subsequently used for other purposes „ such as stiwage, laundry uses, etc. Mr„ Joseph Mundy, 740 24th Street, objecte.,6„ raking the point that his view to the south would be completely eliminated k.',y an R3 building like the one proposed. Mr. Hugh McCormick„ 640 - 2ist Street, questioned whether the existing utilities 'could support the structure:, specifically water wessure. Mrs. Hugh McCormick, 640 - 2ist Street, feY.t that the new seventy-one, unit apart- memt compiexon A:Mmore„ together With the anticipated addition of seventy-one more units:, would be difficult enough to absorb into the area. She also mentioned that • . the north side of 21st Stet is posted "No Parking" and doubted that the developers could install nine parking spaces on the side of the street. Richard Parker, 2110 Boyiolan Avenue, said that parking is the No. 1 wobiern In Hca-mosa Beach, and the addition of more apartments would intensify it. He didn't feet that the tenants would contv:ibute to the, total Lie of the city, and said that even though packing was ps-oviderl, he still c'et they would park in the street. Public. hearin.g closedt 8:2F • • Chairnian Noble summarized the points brought up in ti18'hearing: traffic, agree- . merit with the General Plan, utilities, benefit that it would bring to the city through attraction of a certain calibeT of people. He .said.the Commission should consider the need or lack of need for a.dditional apartment units in the area, the effect of separating the0 potexatial on the west from the C-3propenies on Pacific Coast • Highway, an.d the commitment implied if the tallange is .made4. Corits commented that in his opinion this zone change would create spot zoning, and he thought it would behoove the pixo.peqty owner to talk.to the.owners of the commercial lots. The Planning Commission is charged With propeF planning. of ail areas of the City, and cutting off the 0 potential., leaving shallow (i15') 0-3 lots was not proper planning. He agreed that R-1 vas aot a proper use, but sug- gested the entire block of land from Pacific Coast Highway to the back of the C Potential should be changed at once: if changed. Mr.. Yorg said that th€ General Plan. refers to the area as capable of any.use„ resi- dential, commercial, etc. He felt that the•apartment house would be- the best use for the land. • Comm. Waiters questioned whether the time fol this type of development is- now; whether it wouldn't bo better to wait until after certain capital improvements are accomplished such as Street N.F.aideniug, Comm. Muifinger wondered how the area ever would develop commercially under separate ownerships. • • Comm. Collis said he wasn't ready to make a decision changing the zone of just these lots •at this time... Comm. Watters agreed that the Cominission would have to determine, the impact on the whole area before moving contrary to past planning. COMM 'Watters moved, seconded by Comm. Collis, to approve the subject Irequest to change zone from R-1 with 0 potential to R-3' at 731 - 739 * 21st Street. Motion failed to carry by the following vote: AYES: Comm. Wiulfinger NOES: Comm. Collis, Watters, and Chairman Nobte. ABSENT: Comm. Himmel„ Stabler„ Too/e. Resolution P. C. 154-771 Comm. Watters moved, Comm. Collis seconded, to adopt Resolution P. C. 154- 771 denying the request to change the zone with 0-3 potential to R-10 731 - 739 21st Street fox. the following reasons: 1. The findings o: the Panning Commission crcIth the area protesting additional R-3 uses a t his time, eutaaas of fk-F;;S ident S • -4-- 2. This type of development -at the present time, due to inadequate street width • and offstreet parking standards „ would increase problems for the residents in the area, 3. At the current time there is no need for additional high density residencesin the area; in fact„ such would be detrimental to proper growth. 4. If this zone change were accomplished, it would cut off:0 potential to the Wpst„ lessen the planned commercial depth of Pacific Coast Highway lots when,the• actualy exists a n,eed tOr commercial. property of Substantial depth -in the city'. The Resolution was appKoved by the following vote: AYES: Coital. Collis, Comm, Watts, and Chairman Noble., NOES; Comm. Mulfingea ABSENT: Com hime Stable,r, Toole. Chairman Noble. informed the applicants that the action 1,s final unless they appeal to the City Council..within ter days Chairman Noble suggeste...a ,Special Study Session to review the planning of this area. Coe Use PerrO: Ceramics1 City Planner Crawford saal that this business had been admen a Conditional Use Permit in December, 19$. id ws reapproved in April, 1969 for a one year period, which has expired.. Thaae. a,?vae, initially five conditions, two of ;which have not been, me.3t, Although a parKing aN'fal has been created, it -has not lace;eic properly a3elineated. The landscaping has not been completed. Mrs. Dorothy McEwend new operator of the ceak)arcs yard, said that they now were in a position to open the yard seven days aeyeek„ and although she had planned to have the landscaping fisAshed, she haa'braken hea leg which had delayed it. With someone on the premises Tegulait9-, they could noy,7 see that the cars stored en the parking area were removed, arid' be able slat", to keep the landscaping watered. Comm. Collis moved', seconded by Comm. Watteas to extend the Conditional' Use Permit for anoth,ea yeaa„.,bUt, aeviev,I again in. sixty days to allow the applicant time to fulfill the conditi(?nS as ca•;iginally stipulated with additional recommendations below. „ 1 That the -Paved area at the intersection of Rh aild Pacific Coast Highway be signed "No Peaking" and barriers be exectO: to prevent the legal parking of vehicles in said aaea. That the legal pig area tes.igned "Cuitomea Padang, Only" and the storage iC of vehicles by the body shop paa,:vcsinte. taacessa.ry, by baraierS during closed hours „, 1 April 20, 1970 TOE Planning Commission FROM: William Ei, Berlin, Jr,, Chief of Pollee SUBJECT; 731 - 739 - 11 Street - TRAFFIC Honorable Sirs: We have been requested by Mr, Robert Crarsford to comment upon traffic conditions and past police problems within the immediate area indicated above, Parking, whether it be within the specific area indicated or tnroughout the entire c3cy, is in fact a problem„ bnt. one that can be minimised if properly attacked throagh.planningo such as Z. spaces per apartment rather than the cuctornary 1.=.1/2 spaces per a,partment, however, this is purely an action of your august body rathe.r than police, • Noise, party houses and other related police problems exist once again, in all areas of the City, and will remain that way until more strict selection of occupants is made by the . owners of the apartments, Traffic engineering can best answer the questions re ard- Mg congestion and traffic flow, and therefore, will not be eluded to in this brief report, In general, we find no valid reason '5,4}2y this area cannot be changed to the requested none® Respectfully. subsnatock WILU&144 H0 13 - Chief of Police WHB /1x1 T0° C OF h EPMO5A B` h N T BE-OFFECie1 I AZ SUBJECT. °ire ani " Vicin t of 7 ?;:7`9 21s.t Street Lots 20; 219 22 Hermosa View Tract FROlvilltt4War-n-1:ALI* rant Foll.owinG a careful eveluation of , ,th area ntt ` "abcv€ I find that a change in Zone from 1` tl "R133 would not in - itee:l f create an emergency accons problem: to the point. of. endangering life. Similar delre1 pr en e"=i* the Same -area .: ` have not substantially increased the ieo Sa '4.T,_- 3 proper development would. a eq ap `oved'=aec & *nt --: the property, installation of approved fire pre teotive devices within the complex,.end fire protective constructionas applicable nr3er the .Utiford areyentioza Code.. I a= complete egreesneat its the st of tot.: ; adequacy of the present: , a setback. ; _ chime ::n : €n+a.- talc pr ide additional vehic .e traffic Qn- 2 :st $hbe.Aubject to widening ning of hong = increase in•. de a ty pw.enas oveUr ow <th_i .dopertment9 ,,:I cannot in - good c ci: ravne proposed change be deaied on the grounde it T4oittlrd ares:, immediate cr ;forsee b1.:e danger to life and pr: par an access hazard. MINUTES OF ': .EG' iY i.R l c r N v OF VIE ? N r'. G COMMISSION HELD 3N COUNCIL OLLdrL CITY HALL, 3iERMayo A BF..:v La ON MONDAY APRIL 6 970 AT 7:3C; ?. M. MEETING tau yD TO £ ^4 Ye '} $ liZ 1 �. C. Xi° gM •'}i NOBLE. � . % *�:c >.i`c�a�:a � ORDER v s�. .� e �. a bra w €1 r. � tii..,4�`a...:��.�'1�t E"a ' ��:�.. ROLL CA" bele Comm. M i a riC T OOI ;Q "'Natters and Ch tartan Noble A sen>t r Cornm.. Stabler and Himmel. e Motion by Comm.Toole, sec �c J ndd by Comm. o \N o tter s to approve the minutes of the ka ch 16,} 1970 meeting. Request eq:e3F o4 Tames °%ciitifor an .e,. 2of land use zone from R-1 wi1aCpotential to R-3 on pots 2''t!.;, 21 22, e:rf osa View Tract 4-1: `acing 7$1, 737, 739 - 21st Comm. MIlfinger arcivec at 7;42 p: Ctty Planner Cra ac d described the lots in quest Crl as bein east of Ardmore and west 3f Pacific Coast at r;:i,3rF immediately t kthe west of commercially zo ?ed property. At the present tirfi : 'i. iS R-1 with 0-3 potential. The applicants are requesting that these ot-- be rezoned R -3l W.1,e family. he plan to ..ts three combined lots �.'o_ e-tn apartment n house containing thirty units, on 20,60u square feet. At present: the `r'h d.'ed set -hack s 5 'h c? the staff feels is inade- quate. The street ts dedicated to he 660} wide, but is only inpro-v :d with a 30' pavement It is he staff's opinion that 21st Stt.est will be able to handle traffic generated by the proposed -c bui1dirs.g.... The General :'ala n indicates a multi -use corri- dor:, and the propos :d use is not oat of context. The staff feels that the city could absorb R-3 development on the property c r.d on the :`!io lots westerly. . However, if the zone is charged, the si t.-bacl:m should be increased to pro -vide for vehicular safety. Comm. Collis read a petition dated April 6,, 1970 protesting the requested changse, signed by. forty-four ou persons representing tweyat ,-nine properties within three hun- dred fe " un - d dire t. of. the proposed cha g(. Public Heal:lag _ ^p el' gad at 7t.40. 40. y * r r. 'o a fames 'Cta3yvi�s L::, the wr.t ?F and applicant i?r:L 'may the G:sem change, presented some post plans and elevations o,'. s ok the 3ropo` wd building and introduced his ar chizect4, Ms. jack-Ohertioff, of 5274 Vs.. Pico, Los Ag, 90019, Mr.. Chernoff said that he realized neighbors= c ,tetb3$S; y tht. .� building would be a a design compatible viii ., re ,t,sea.`_f,.:7: quality. ,.t `i i �`OnSirit of one and two bedroom apal`:[[� a9 lv. .n •'td'..MV H i= N- mento : with3aU parking underneath the ildiE' g , To the G.jer,t th outside portion which would ld b visible would be he pool area. A so -Giza area as planned on the sc.-4)f.#. The kfu.ldrdc4would ;ca as a buffer vte;any commercial building on Pacific Coast klicihway„. Mr, Fr z? 'ts Carney, 730 _..) >>'E; `"c.„'€ et, spol, ii cf7ta astt,ons to the Gt. Kie) change because he ., 3 i, that it a a tc is.x:x:Fi s;1.y congested and he wantod to keep the neigh- borhood R-1. 1 . Htst t.—Be`a E?J 2:207 wa:! tC:oat spo '•'e rE por it ion eca 1se he felt it would be ^reriz ;'3�.EKage he zone before the General Pi n is im p1e- oriented; and the present apartment buildings in the neighborhood create police problems ms aI d trz,aufz'ie.'.: ar.. a patting orob e :as; that the.. R-1 character e: ov. the neighbor- hood needs to be M.n tx`L:w ;a Mrs. Maly EW McCormick., 64 0 � 21st ^`: Str4et; H. C;. McLendon, 2112 1. Mont Co BC?lCla2dr B arbaz n. 3�-Vn�,, �[i6 SpbiBjliei+ya joy Ny3zns M 649 r2kSt S tlee6 spC'S>..N�`� «SAJE..Ls'sG'sG4.d`C1 for the same :reasons. rm ro Gfae�c g Yam, Rm:a. r, 1026, .Mwiattan &,1).,och,Doulevryd , said aSGhat since the v `oyeriy q as Located ouatLY iw a ALFtw S swd"ric t'2, had-aM bmen,w; both %Ny4nd and across the street, wouldhave adequate pwy n,J, and would :e rented to solid citizens at above-average rents, , i e `est. it w r. a c F''.M.,lstey 1ogkc. I apartment house site.. a.E?i:Hearing closed 313S �iE :33Y Gb-tpi.y to :,Y k,r, isss a_,'P' ("''+:'�%'�� �"t•.�jl; `g"*6;�'' C `,e tly;, i attet WL s ~ ernok7�.: the . ��!l�. {'�. �i.- � .;i�,. ]�.tim .� fLs s.7 qtr �e .`.L� � 'Cli Q3.'c- .# ��, ].L� �.i� r y architect„ wa 4;3 diet the two-b'c"''&oom opal F:2 kents^ would e approximately 14100 square f4tit , art& thy oye' .veZrOfin4 apartments would be 700 io 000 qua feet in area; that the coverage e-ik,ould ?',ice 60 70%, :'w� rth lots of. balconies. Ile said That they would abide by �i:�";• ,ca,ldardis zec- Sae:; such as Er. set -back to 10', more park- ing a ti"ing per apartment cz any- other 9' {H which would make the building lTsc're pala- table llatabl J to the iaa ghbor '$ood ,+ Comm.Collis indicatedthat he ' olio;"wd the. zone change but could not accep, t the proposed t,g`tandatds., and Comm. Toole swinged up his feelings by saying that. it a i?,:ears a=:t DZ -r u 84,.1fdi the property except cs the paski.n_e pro- blem which exists, and st ,r si no building proposed' i; too eat. COMM. WattreE :regular me tt g the xec tz e"st .: { cpoteettai toR-3 on lots 20, s 5+:ria by Comm. Collis, to postiar,ne until the next. v. Z-707.1 change of lead ,Ise z`, - 3 with ;.•� t�r a+ s y c a He no s a View `_ra c 4 41 ,, being 4 731, . s: ,a A • 739 -- 2. Steezt C;;!OritiniS2AcTa VLIZZ o corciSEtklY ithe pc k)loills and :D:-.,Ipai752Fient and the ,Tas,-?iart.Eic,,..i.it ilaplciraent.th Con. Collis added tIzat he th.e, vtaif,,..! fAensit:y F.-:;..nd land 1,1e dviopme ii also a ittzki...1.111. oc.;:i-i,Etny..ec kri,Y•:g4; dan'ai .1-1,71.17,fS: 7,1kiati:6,r3 and (2.:t?,•i84-4r.i1i1 P:JOES‘z Cr.q7.fair,,„ 2.!1.133,EN1: • cthc.rai7fcv C4..izist.(3 -use :zone tom 11---.1 to R-2 on 21.„ 22. , L. 241 76?2..• '.ge. 9,, . 32„ 33 and 34 Takct 113aE4 24 c: Fok 7,. Trimct; acc.,,-td caEi.;--Ist sida. of Loma. Lrfois between ..2].A St'ieet and City Planner Ct-av-217o-pri'ht axtherly of 21st vi,;15‘Iev The c...i,reent1:17 devii.:lorgbd and pEislc.ing pro- blem,„ Apre v1if.„-::::;,•;„ 2c-Ine ctLailge of th-ti..,se a-i,as cleated by- the 1,‘,,s -cause„ it t;!../asn't felt to we to Ft -2 fi.nflstcatetsiwiclaklisit5r zisezio t"afg nTrFJs.-131-2t ”PAeti,i The stagOa,.. what. is c•noulti .be tO deny Public% liearcLatg 2146 Lciiia a-Lopif..c.,int, for Z,IzE:i 2;*.a6 ctriengf,isoJ fav -or trt zoils cefi.a•K:.0;;; 'the oZpux- ch..F.ise;*2 feel th.e., most 4,2=1_1' th icuivt,--;•ye built Regal:Iv goy' ovme..7.1 ot'api.R0.47 ga,-24,36tIrly imvanty v,4-4,:csvAly that ',the ant;;ig5dbazal 61-$6,azgad L9F:05„ °then: uns1„:31-.o ac;arg,z',„', beloatzsa can- goli, -,rays t IF. oczsmin8-sited that public aoninf,31-,3i1Q,ukl aivea.toraal-:e tt hOL;A:3,-St ,c,f5 AP.Ve OLtS1TaCjiE: 1. RIC On -4 d 1.1Zi:Z.1100atqto rfiCYfE: peCIYIICif IRCTO '". April 1).., 1970 TO Planning CoMmissioa PROM: City Planner SUBJECT: Analysis Zone Change Z-70-1 REQUEST: To change land use zone classification from R-1 with 0 (073) potential to R-3 on three lotsp north side 02 -21st Street directly west of 0-3 commercial zoned property. Total area to be changed: 201,600 square feet 109 x 196.3'. HISTORY: This 'property and property to south of -21st Street was given 0 potential in 1956 in anticipation of eventual commercial development along with property fronting Pacific Coast Highway. Properties south of 21st Street along Pacific -Coast Highway have been and are being developed with apartments in despite of the Opotontial zoning. The properties in Question are now developed with single family dwellings and are under separate ownership from the Properties fronting Pacific Coast Highway. ANALYSIS: There appears to be no interest at this time in .developing Pacific Coast Highway for commercial uses in the vicinity of the subject property. The depth (196.3 feet) of the lots in Question preclude satisfactory R-1 development. Development of commercial uses fronting on -21st Street would be highly undesirable. -21et Street is sixty (60) feet wide which is adequate for multiple family developments. The front yard. setback is five feetwhich.is not adequate, especially for garage exits and landscaping. The property is below and slopes downhill from Pacific Coast Highway. The property is adjacent to C-3 commercial zoned property. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to City Council for approvaland that front yard be increased to ten (10) feet. Pae 2 BASIS: The proposed commercial use as reflected in the C phOteritial has not been realized on Property to south. The General Plan shows this property as part of a multi,. use corridor Whioh includes apartment t hoT. ses. —21st Street is to become a major collect l° -street for this area. The three lots are scheduled to be developed as one. Should this not- occur for some reason it would be impossible to develop more than three units on each of the lots; therefore, the city appears to be adequately protected from substandard development on small lots. The present demand for apartment units in this area indicates that it is possible to absorb mere apartment • zoning in this vicinity. C 0 1? Y qb the City Ccuncf.1, • 5 May 70 make an appeal to the decision of the Board of Zoning at the hearing of April 27, 1970 of being demi&ths grant of the variance to keep mv six foot fence at 663.1/2 LongfeI'1/2w Hermosa _Beach. /s/ noug1a9 O. Sniffen, Tenant 6611/2 Longfellow Hemosa BeacIlvCaL y 1 1970 City Council Hermosa Beach, California Attentiong Mary A. Zdeerten,eity Meek Rel Appeal of Douglas Sniff n You are hereby notifiod.thmt I protest tho pro posed variance that € wind anew the .® pi foot fence t@ remain era the font yard at 662* • Longfellow Hermosa Beach. ± understand it ma erecto&without obtai ;. ; a permit,: nor was it f peci es 9 d I regues .a r aeonabi Ome to be set not:t =.a;,..i d tie we,k5 a* remove or miter :ms:e to oompiy ' ith Hermosa Asa; City bb.dimicod: Yours since e:1y, as 00FiPs ter 460 e11 8 Ave • • NAME: Douglas Sniffen LOCATiOM: 62- Longfellow TO DEM: The erection of a O ft. h;gh fence 11 front yard setback cl 10 ft. In lieu of requlred maxima* height of 3 a'..panMtted En setback. DATE: April 27, 1970 RESOIUTICX A.S. i54-13 A RgSOLUVOM B7 THE BtARD OF ZOW;HS ADJUSTNENTS OF THE CITV OF 1HERWEA BEACH DENViat A ZONOMMARIANCE WHiCH WULD PL2litT THE ERECTION OF A 64OOT Hi8H FENCE 8N FRONT YARD SaTEACK OF OD FOOT fifil tin OHEW:RED NAMUR HEOGHT OF 3 FOOT PERMITTED iN SET - AM. SAID PROPERTY LOCATED AT 662,1 LOWELLOW: Ler 92. SOUTHERN CALEFORMA CONVEMT;ON NALL AND AMINE UMW PARK MUT, CITV OF HEENOSA 6EACH, CALiFORNiAL, THE BOARD OF MMHG ALJUSTEEN75 EIF THE CITY OF WPFIOSA BEACH DOEs Rg- SOLUE A FO.LOW WAS .6 there wasflied with. this Board, under the provOs'dons of Ordlnence M.S. 11),:,, an application for a variance by Dausls Sniffea upon property occupied as a tenant. and located at 662-1E Longfellow. WHEREAS. W BOARD OF zamms ADAISMENTS of the City of Marmaca Beach did o April 27. OW*, conduct a pubiic heaving to considev this appEication to part the erection of a 6 ft. high fence En front yard setback of 14.1 ft. gA Hem of required maxboun height of 3 ft. parmEtted Oa setback. and WHEREAS at said public hearing there was presented written and oral testimony on the property described as follows: Lot 92., Southern California Convention Hall and Merino View ?ark Tr. TH.EREFORE, EF. (IT RESOLVED that in view of the Ending at said hearEng. the Ooard of Zoning A4aants does hereby deny this variance for the foilowin reasons: • t. There are no exceptioasi OT extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved. 2. The grantins of this variance would be giviap, the owner special privileges within the immediate vicinity not shored by other property in the same vicinity and one. 3. The grating of this variance would he materially detrflmental Co the public welfare and gnjurious to the property and prove2lents an the imediate vicinity in which the property is located. • O2.0, RESOLUTWM l54 -t6 PAGE 2 AVM 27 igo The foregoing Resoiution was adopted by the Board of Zoning Adjust- ments at a regular meeting hetd Apr n 27, i970, by •the following votes AVESs Comm. Ostermann, Williams, Reeves WBESs More URTWOCAINON hereby certify that the foregoinA ResoluHom BOZA. MoSo 5$4.48 was adopted by the Board of Zontng Adjwilts of the Oty of Hermosa Oearh at a regular meeting Maid cut WS 27th day of April, l9700 DATE_ .41...C41A,440X.J0....W.GLia, AV Richard Williams, Secretary Morman Reeves, Chairman ( Secretary Willian road an appbit:aten fr)r a varianc* az fottovA,: "Xppica44un t(n- va"ii:nce !Is; gousOes Solffeo,.teniJnt at 66Zf kort-9feDieran Lot. 92. Soucho(n Calif, Celvvention Naltand Narina ttlow -aris TreCt, Wermmo 104acil. Cai!fnFnla. R-'. in order c erect a WO fence U front yard sett:1430z of 10' to lieu et reougred maximum height of 18 permitted in &etbach," Butiding Uuri irett„ rzod !effort, prote5tOng the variance from Loutte G. '.7..-stor, 6W LcoOellow, Ly C. end Joass A. Perez, 642 25th S.• ,eto and gir. end Ars. w.H. Jone%, 63/ 6th Streati, Raahattah Beech. DuildlOR Diector, Bud Trott, eead the aaalysis of tlw =fiance a weitg,kan by City Planner, Zob CrattoCerd. analysis reoommanded deedoi of tko cosilawo • for reasons az sot forth. - Public hearing orpzmd at. Avplicent. Douglas Sniffen, CW/S, forward end ldaatiVfad Mea,a1f ae tha toAant at E562-1 LongfOlow.t ivted that when he built the fanom, he &ought dhat building permits wore required aoly for buildinza. mot qor He said the house he outs and one other, were the only houses Ga tteoot tathout heck yards. He stetted that ho huJlt the fence, because h8s 4 --year daugbcor needed a piece to play In safety. Oo sold tl'ure had bean a 4staiderstandlag lo his coali2rsotloos with the Buaid4ng DepartmenL, Chairman R,zetre invgled anyone to wished to 5poi5k far aro variance to ctra41 forwaru. 40 on.., Cha!rman then tnOtod onyx who tolallod to sguat against the vrizr;Ce to acme fortvard. Nr. Bi81 Fostor, monur of OW property at 6b: loo-.:, 1:ama foru‘erd. Kr. Foster be;d ne tiO5 prOto5t109 foe both hOu Aft) 4md tokzaaf. Ne gtated • HUTS QFCZA VASE 3 TO L iga A motion was mods by Comm. that he felt the variance shouid denied f*r t6e Miowing reasons: me fence was built without a permit. Tho Oooes is in violation of the Deilding Code. 3q. Other peopte have been turned dowse* 4* fences and be can see. no reason why Mr. Smiffen should be ths privileged exaaption. Ma said the fence cuts off the view from tkat.directean and feat that t4e fence ebouid ,,,.. cut drop to 31. fl 41' Public hearing closed at &1l7 pe A motion was made by Chairman %saves, t4conded CON0.6 estormoon. grant the veri*nca. Motion failed to Gerry by the fallowing voila AYES: Rona HOES: Comm. Ostarmenn, Williams, Chairman %eaves A motion was made by Chairamo Reaves to adept Resolution M.S. 154-18 DEMO the variance. , Olen carried by foilawine vote: hust Coe OSterMGQ06 Williams, Cholow.i Reo s. NOES: None. Building Director. Dud Trott. advised Kr. Sniffen that ho could appeal the 40=1s -foil to the City Council in writwithin ten days. • • Copy Planning Comm. City of Hermosa Beach Dear Sirs Ap„ 15 - 1970 As a property owner in Hermosa Beach I feel that I have the right to express my opinion. don't like the 6' fence on Longfellow going to the sidewalk. Also can't see how a tennant has the right to do this without a building Dermit - 6: even get the $50.00 fee waived. Sincerely, /s/ Mr & Ars Mr. E. gones 637 - 6th St. M. B. April 20, 1970 ire Bud Trott, Building Director C/O Beard of Zoning .fid juvts eats H. r aost I3eaoh8 California 190254 April �fl� R! a V1 ar`'i %pr' l 27 the You are he2reb' notified tat 1 protest the rroposed variance that would allow the 6 foot hi.ght fence to remain on the front yard at 662* Longfellow, Hermosa Ba'r h0 I understand it was erected without obtaining a permit, and 1 request a reasonable time to be set not to exceed three weeks to remove or alter S ,, to City Wilding cod Yours sin erely, mise G. Foster, 66p Longfellow Avec HTr2osa. BaachoCal f0 (�pp; iii' i ::i lt1 P1A'NIUD DEPT. 642=25th Std Hermosa Beach$,Calif6 April 20, 1970 Planning Commission Hermosa Beach, California Dear Sirs: Several years ago we inouired about building a 5° fence on our front property line in Hermosa. Beach, and were told that there was.a 3' restriction. Even though there was a small child 9 s safety involved, as tax payers and property owners we complied with the restriction„ Now we understand that a 6' fence has been erected on the front property line at 662* i<ongfel1owg Hermosa Beach, which according to the explanation given us does not comply with city ordinances. We feel that the 3' height limit is reasonable and keeping within standards .inot detrimental to the appearance of our city streets. We *?pink it should.be enforced without exceptions., Thank you in advance for any consideration or action that. you give our letter. Sincerely'., Luck. C. Perez Jesse A. Perez 'Mt Chairman and.mDmilars of the Scard of lonIng Adjustments 21&& City Planner Immy3 Analysls af variance requast 0.Z.A. W.S. 154?47 66247 LeaTigfenem= Lc 92* Southern Caiif. Conventton Nail and Harane View Park Tract. Finupp To erect a si-foot Wigh 6ewe en front yard ilnstend ot? the three - lett fence alewed by cediSnanaa. =ED The fence h questlan hes already been built. iJt is actually located in the street right -a -way. No other fences 4i excess of three fea, havo bean permited in Ws zcne atd v0Onity. sidayard fence presondy encroaches into tto greOt yard at 6614a* Longfeiktk Oich creates a hazard and shouhl be Vermitred. Vhe :applkmt hes vaquested and bean granted, a waiver of &sr fee by the City CounclE. Ho oxpressic;n of opinion regarding the subject re., quest was made at thet tima. AWTTO.J B. The purpose of the gront yard mot tt) provide private ,satios.ffir resWents. The purpooe to provide Ught, visibtilky, and safety for aN resNents c the street and within the sub,,,neighborhead within whgch the spd zotback exElsts. The purpece of the fence helght strietban is to preserve this opsnmss. 2 Thepure of vw@ance procaaeinip is to "provant.discalmlnatian"t "Ro variance shaU %c srented whilch woutd have the effect 0 grantgng a special privilege not siwxed by other property t,!n the sataa vicinEty aad RO*00" 1,Exerpts fro3.C.Z.e., sec. Pon) The request appears be for just such a special pltalege. Under Sectlon ;400 of the ?of/16z Crdtnsncao the B.Z.A. Us required to mzke four affirmative Ondings 11:n grantMg z valiance rawest. M, Ws caseit is tha stafFs eyln6en that: t. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circuwtences or cenditicea plicable to the subject property uhich do act epOly to every property in this area. The enistlng ff ehardship is a self-,Empesed hardship,„ and as suCht, cannot be considered as a basis f r granting a variance. The variance must be consideeed as though the! fence did not exist. 2. The variance is not accessory to proservea sustant!al property aght pos uweedi-tv.;,othee pmptrty the zame vioinfty aad acne, since no other • ,property in this vicingty zvDne has the rtis4t to• erect a fence =re than three foot high in the front yard. The greating of the, vergance Could ba materialiy detrimental: to the publk . =hare by rename ef-autormbirie sight distance wane backing oat* Longfellow. Should other simitiar requests be granted based on the granano of the subject request to hazardous ecaation wouldresult. 4. There does not appear to be an adverse effect, on ths general ; an resuitirol direct!y from this request. On the ba' s a the above„ft ft $P:ipassibto to recommend lavzrably on this re -- quest. fact,, the contInued encroahmant el 3,foot fences on the street r6ght of -may shoutd be serlcusly retuated. RECCKWIMATfiN tlunal, based cA the above fic,dings. /, ,-"Y F° '`J"''%.-' O/.ra • .dam"!' 'i /,/i� 9; :^'r✓ ;�'r rte -?'.off.'.; ^y �a?:r,v,,-y-3' rrroa RE9U V/ ,1mCx - Mr. Douglas J. Sniffen, 662 1/2 Longfellow Avenue. DISCUSSION •- Mr. Sniffen was present and requested this the Council consider waiving the $50 fe normally required for a pu.blic hearing regarding -guest for variance, as thesix foot fence for which this variance was required dun to a misunderstanding lega.rding the minimum height had cost hid 6.ore t4:tht` : uat:� During the dfiscussion th t followed.. the Council suggested to .Mr. ton-, inisOor of:Buildttig and Safety, that ;the card of Zoning Adjustment cons id r modifying the fee for variance application in certain cases, and was advised by Mr. Trott to piece this matter before the Planning Commission for their consideration. ACTION - to grant a waiver of the $50 fee for his application of variance for a six foot fence located on property at 662 1/2 Longfellow Avenue. Motion by Councilman Belasco Second by Councihnan Valdes. So ordered Minutes 4/7/70 • • COPY Dear Sir, 25 Mar 70 would like to apply for an extension of time before have to tear down a fence I have constructed on the property of 662k Longfellow, Hermosa Beach so that I may apply for a waiver of the variance fee and a variance. /s/ Douglas O. Sniffen Resident of 6621/2 Longfellow Hermosa Beach, Calif. COPY 4-12-70 I grant Doug Sniffen permission to apply for the Variance for the fence that he now has. Signed E. F. Rose Owner of said Property 532 PineStreet Hermosa Bach, California Hay 29 1970 Q. L. The1en, x yor Hermosa Beach Cit Council Hermosa Beach, California ar MayYor The lens Please consider this letter as notice of my resi w+< . tion from the Hermosa Beach Improvemeft Commission. It's been just greytB And I think you are aware of how much I have enjoyed the various projects and activities connected with the Commission.. But, in = ddition to the Coemrnissis n, it seems I ask °PIow come...* to so many different things that I'm off and running all the time. And now I am involved in too many activities which require too much time away from my family and hog;.8 so I am going to TRY to curtail outsid activSties for a while. It has been stimulating, being part of such a working group ,and without doubt the Improvement Commission has proven'it works. With your indulgence, I would like to continua, on the trash testing program until the testing has been cor�. pleted and the questionnaires have all been tabulated. .ncerelyY, Mrs. illiam R. Ryan, XL May 1, 1970 CIVIC CENTER F NERVOSA Honormblw Mayor and Members of the City Council: E6CN CALIVORNIR Pii6of As a member of the Hermosa Beach Improvement Come fission, 1 wish respectfully to request 7 six-month 1 v of absence dung ray term which expires on January 31, 1973. It will b necessary for me to be out of this City during this time; however, my interest in the improvement And b-autifiation of oa r community will continue, and 1 would deem it both an honor and a genuine privilege to be permitted to continue to work with the Improvement Commission upon my return to Hermosa B ch. Respectfuily submitted, h R 376-0454 May 8, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mary IL Edgerton City Clerk SUBJECT: improvement Commission - Terms of Office Due to an error on the part of this office, the names of Improvement Commissioners Kathy Bergstrom, Don Murray and Barbara Darden were presented to your honorable body in December, 1969, as part of a reminder list regarding City Commission terms about to expire, and were listed as serving terms expiring DeceMber 31, 1969 rather than December 31, 1970 as was the case. These three Commissioners were subsequently reappointed to full four-year terms to expire December 31, 1973. Since that time Barbara Darden has resigned, and Mr. Hank Doerfling was appointed to serve out her unexpired term now listed as expiring DeceMber 31, 1973. Under the terms of Resolution No. N. S. 2816, the terms of Commissioners Bergstrom and Murray and of Canmissioner Doerfling should be expiring, after reappointment, on December 31, 1974. In order to avoid the loss of one year of their term due to having been reappointed one year early, I would respectfully suggest that the City Council rescind the reappointments of Commissioners Bergstrom, Darden and Murray, made on December 2, 19690 and allow me to present the names of Commissioners Bergstrom, Doerfling and Murray to the Council for reconsideration upon the original expiration of their first appoint- ments to office, in December, 1970. We wish to express our thanks to Commissioner Betty Ryan for bringing this matter to our attention. May l2, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Resolution #2954 Requesting Revisions to Zoning Ordinance Gentlemen: The Planning Commission received and discussed your resolution request- ing initiation of changes in Sections 1412, 1413, 1414, 1511, 1512, and 1513 of the Zoning Ordinance. We have referred this request to our Zoning Committee which will study the City Planners analysis, discuss the proposal with the Board of Zon- ing Adjustments, and if there are differences with your resolution, with the City Council or a Council committee (at your option) before starting official public hearings. We are adopting this approach as the start of a new "standard!' procedure for textual changes in the Zoning Ordinance in order to try to prevent mis- understandings and public arguments between the various boards and commissions after the matters reach Council level. We feel this approach will be more effective, and in the long range more efficient, although it will require more involvement on our part. We feel that you will be kept better apprised of the progress on this and all other amendments through this process. Respectfully submitted, REC:mm ROBERT E. CRAWWORD City Planner .1.''''VA7:407113TWAM9( l•TP`•-77,:.'47:WW,Fgd. RESOLUTION NO. N, 3. ?,954 -1311;11M3.4:1r-r47zMi" • MOLUTION OF INTENTION OF Tirl; CITY COUNCII OF THE CITY 01" NutmCo.D., •Aakoz, CA_T.Y.FORDITAT DEC:UR:MG ITS INTENTM TC) INITIATE A,MCNDMENTS TO zourgr..; ownaNcE NO. N.. S. 54, AS AlkitigIVD . A.PFTC TING .A.RTICLP, 14, "VARIANQRS /km CONDITIONM.. UBE PERMITS" , SP.C'NON'S i 41 2 , 413 AND 1414, AND ARTICLE 15. "AMEIMMENTS " , SECTIONS 1511 , 1512 AND 1513 REGARDING FLINI DINGS MB) DMISIONS or cm couNCII. NECEnSkitY TO CARRY OUT GENERkl, PURPOSE OF ZOICNG ORDDIAITCE. WEI P,M.S certain confusion h regitilted from the Warp:mint to.a of tioatetib 1421 't1 fzosaing orarattte tu). O. 154, an emended; end WETEMS„ Et iv, the intont of thr City Couretzzil to aittlyttEST: ttiage izebSeUVIRIF4.3.0ttgl,, CATAvs3 rate evatione N)W, SIMILIFORE, THE Ckla' CONCL OF TUE CITY OF MUM DUI,CHe CALZORInk, DOM ntiTY RIZOLVE FOLUXIM GEC:MON 1. 'nett purstant ebt3 mrei8tartfo of Mut@ lg., EforAtemi MI a • Zor giav avdistmoue N. N. S. 1641, mar:tied, the C Oxman tba: CRT gozwAvE,ri Ranch doeg heterp decicao tts tsavotion (to initiate flop fkalovateoti eatergimants Tattav 14, ifgestkoe 102, .141 Rad MN of mad girmilaw Ord/Inman, to mtd Ott &Atom; "SECTIor4 1412. COMIC& TO MITOUNCE FUlDLIV:a )UD I)17,4% City Corstaf1 don actrouneo its findings n/14 d9cizion within immeorga,1,6 tam:11W roi. to p...ratv4 EWA, deirm fontramts of ti yput*Det holatg41/43,6 mEatal ood tntwo aitt% f:Trtbexteregion of titr.leg oroi the appilostat t,r oap;:vpm. Y...toth not:int-4 ad this re..-leacton arg tIva tr.zeona tharefor. 1711.4 tuullstge mahl citgon gtmtri remits, th4 tsfifut rael. reaams Itvhkuta to Me opinion og. the C ColhawIl araizo the; ery,Er. el re ,5.41n7t4,1 thz Varigeme Coulaional Ueo Ptctit aellerstairy tomay out, tb,p DtA.T.47;30t0 0.1.g 111,1: codituralgvi, 0E4 ett611 orttlev. ttat thV44.,riBMt COrvAittatall Ek.blUttt c”V.Mik.3214 wariti4.PadMo; up enU wridEttwail Qg' Eta`iitttti-VDD WtMTV tat:1;44`,, ..ekt,42:414;24; 0m, tamswas to..7 rafmeemae pldat of clay findiagf,2. c.4 Euty 63'2.M4MiCal, arltraw odituielietraaivo offilm alttava, Imwevety aottitv4 avth Lrs froP.L fIct6tra:,-.,;: ElfeW aminggolipm, twaring offt.my atrutnlormtiv* otikivir dva ithetancsg mid • , (;):45:1-tiEgailo hatRittt2 OfffgaT adnVolotigiva officaT er.e writtpa L.p,4 CM; tt • the, ,ri a ?I f !_. f6'if 4:3 i3:Cf 4. t‘T.f t.h, ;)ro itersrt2tit aecorti ttle, C; it y. t i^3 (3t -'ti' t::Y i F t+ t+lai i ;:ax.'7S•. l; if) ��..,tlfi Iti'.+0 (it!ttJ` '.i. Tle)tit.:e k:`;il� is ti'W; sat.+`rfit;+ t> Tt;i of %piton T'-•4. �ini� (� �^ Gt .j P: sYf h.;A nt't Y'•t' :oto• tuily C)i3 j. a'..".`.I r'i^ir t ii th 1•0164:i`il SZI dam: !a'.1.rl x'fta "SECTION :13 . .DECISION OP THE CCUNC1? SHALL BE L -INA,. The r:ti rI ip the City uunc'.t or. t:uot::natters Multi ho by majority vote of he mecmberse.9e nt � d voting, end shall be final and concluttiwi, except: (1) The City Council rev approve,. modify or dtritiPwovra the recommendation of the F'Etann c►c: C;c:►tretiSr ori, pro icipti that Env' modification of Ow proposed Eretdance og Conditional Use i•e..•l Sii• hy tfi {.!crEq.C. t4 9i1a.1 first be referred to Manni eg CoiP.2[fSlstkio fol report andBEetc.rcrlrnendatiorif but the ?f•a:.ring Commission shall t r t be required to fold el public h ~grins thereon . rzs !lure of: the Planning C'2;ea irastne'a to the City Council witta9 fogey (-tJ-1 i yt atter the reference, or ctEoh longer pe Testi ear fie y E ins°s.g t;€ d by the CityCovncii, stoatl be downed to be approval of the pioposetl modification. UPOD the return of i:t:e ine.tter to the City Cour LF, the Cid* Council. my by 'int4cmity =dote of the niernbern present end voting afgariVei, rl kiLy dies p re t final recommendation of the Pia ac ting Cs torrsiiseiora him.ttem. "SECTION 1.414 NOTICE OF DECISION OP THE COMM. Not latter than thirty (1 0) days following the fine& c ciUfor of the City C_Qryri s£1 that a ante o® os Condition& TIGt.% Pa rrtsdt lay granted carr denied, notice: of such union 86,41 be ITIOttod €tea the a+pl oznt or opponent, or Cra both eta:;, o differes t . ttea, and orLe copy shall be attached to the Planning -Corsmission`s ftis of the cele end mid file teiu' to the Planning Cora cs iora for permanent ffi i 4g, Pa item to tk t, n nalim mot € te-. de:Melon rill:Mewed in theses Et rt.613 SECTION 2. That the City Cot@ rclil of the City Timm are Benr t doem &aurae y declare 1tm intention to ire9U:site the following atnendme te Itiltiote i ., Sections 1511,, 1512 utnd 1513 of Zoning Ortf:i.ncinut No. N 8. 154, eszitme,n etil, o reed as so8l'O a "SZ I: rd 151 f . CITY. CCUNCIL `€X-9 k1,111Ol.f'?EC1: FINDINGS AND D .:ISIONN Cly Council. Erh&1 announce it e findings lin d zot. =ion aJ,thtn a reasonable time but nut to exf74twi . foliovtt-110. t;i10 • of the, 96,1.0; u.z?leieft ;toed (=two f:1,t1.41; app../ .1,L; , no. ift.4.•; autt tlie re-Ei ..TU -lit Id t.•: • ?..f. -n*. ;'1..D1,1-. r.f:t. t';•••1,1, •Ak1.4:a • ei.ft.C351•111OrtlZ Whit • it) C(1k61.1*.k.13 plovult.sr litacireitinaut itecogis,t..ry • :•c• 0,..eitomaI.Ilittlloite, sot triltr, tairt, 1. that 1he,1 einendraer4i 7!9 •go,Otfad; difitazit, or glOttiti5,. inthjoridt.; to etitqi. G'otditiont, *11 ilmitailiovis ,111.0it • -1,i,-, it rx.y Alti.novi, '',(24,404.0d11...ei 5-FlIkeirromebii.:Iii4.4itmnracil eltkor pert ,:f env fifiettarp iiitr , m/ canitaissf4a,% Waititt offiloo,.. .1' %,.,.liatifeilNe., offtooa 'tit expreeety eolith* itiiiIii. , •,...„: ,.., . . tit fla the tts'adtql-gf3 4t,' 4i'44i 6- U1.1 Z.' ' l'' 12 OU6 V L2441 'tie 414taltOZWILA'hre Ogainr t „ . .. , ,.• :,,,•,,,, . .. .. :. .„,. . . ., ..., • find 4106 t t e4t,i mriimizvtwa, Watt* °face • a.: odfintillittilititivo offigie eire, to.`twittirs tiiiiit7:•?' •the . .661 taf-344 fk part milositora•mgraid of the • • •• . . t"agtV (3',Mktit,V. (161:7-11::4',21-6IL•!,:i.tia2toce. 04(111Iva:47W Aorgittirlatv • ... • . • fpiltOsat,Q. ittmatJtfirtilkingg 1.1.cd ekgligttiis Mat b.0.•09 •::OP • . t at4Nici,,tit, tovitt‘o pppre'-‘,. gikt th. who-, eP ftrirlitms) trrA 6i1.614410 .4rfs, 4E: Fr 512 . DECITYDIZ; OF CITY COMICTI, fil'ILL 111441,„ThIito tiee hi the City Conovit on 'milli. tivivitong blf majority vote of t.he irternbote proomit, ArA fixpadwilsttifi,",' 1A9., eywarAt T-4 MAT cohatuti va,y evirgove, ilaxpti:if or eitimtitaitiva t.ts tanormraspdattara tho Fib-nil/1)g armtvitgaUilu procrtrial 4iiat arty roodifimtion of the p opos•ra9 acmr,reittont nio Car Cot:x(1CA sileU firelt be rekgried to,i she ilarming Conoltsziort tea rogni-t Ut recomeaerriatknt, t the Piannami Commtocion gra, rtgintivd hold ti puitMle ileuring tPio,re.swk, rolitsm of ego irik;ixuailtg Coroaf.elfail to court city Ce-suncH 71110A forty (4) days after ttai? ti.efemiwp et° ,onk.r4 Iowa Witte, ao my ha, delitirmted Rtin Cy Cci,stall?. be demigi rn Perilhlgovet t,t,'w Foopgiet-al twfditizateal. C,3) Ufrari the Fott-s7ri of 'Ow, tc.;) CC+,Og41,01t,, gt;* City CouliCa 0.4-4y1-4, majority sratai of. die membeirs pmatm.it end .cg,t3tirili approve . mod tbe ?last recorsreee.tdatiaa of; tt.CS Eialttl'1110 Cfcg`AtiegOati (n) such 131a , "ELCT14 15z a NOT7,0„2 fr)1? DM -51010N OF' !.'1-1E: LUC: ..!•••3t tisean (30) deyti fol)olnuri the. fkami dtle/rtkits oft t'oP `..!-)ur.c:41 Q a.-Aondir.Ant'trs ore) tri.; e,n eappikvsticir 07B' trA3o rote.) AN'AE:An for 414'. .leridillerat, riatfitio oft, ttutal . fiction 2traz1 be trrwdy•it,,o. k appl2eyant at the iaddireeo ohown upon the application, end ,anecpyshat: ro' '4 a ital t(! tac; Nanning conn°5 We of the otise. anti saird filo returr,:d to tr,2: Comlivcaon. tor pairetanentfir 111r to give natlom 0411 not atieCttth dociri ion rendkszed sEcnoN 3 That rafx,n thadoption oil thtts s'encliatton of intention, the Filaregm Commission oball boId ono public hOtaiing themirt, notica of &mkt hasting WW1 • given as movided ilvticha le, Swett= 1604 Ozdfinneo Bro.L Z. 154, amended.. ItTing.D6 APrRovrcp ADOPTED this rth Gg AWL QuentilstL PR MUT of tam GU& eel • KitICOR tho tlitty a2..,44.Variess 1,4s0A. Calffiraggft oaf ME& .A_Pioqt k-.* LIA PORM? 1,„e3L,11, Miptaanecr 21.MAINEY • fiTS WM or LOS ALWAtIfit ) 86. OF NEWSOM 1/1114CET -"' Dan ettriargon; CAT, Meat of the City 0,giCiftWertri COltibmiust, liontby malty that the foaver.A.tvg Reasolaton 241.. .gtV0 dt4-Ry krxtavly passed. alpsietred end adopted by the Ow Councitt liks ett.1? Xv,s7-4)art. kAfv,itit at regular Tazeiteng; geld City Commit bold et the n..),31:41ar pnvir; fott.741. tkmprAl2 &aft 7thday o.f Awn, 1970, fay the tittatiwkRittvptol. , • Aioas Comaranmen Delasca, WitrattnN Kftruc Litiest Mom itineilt; lams .10NIMOt Aga 70 110741 • 024 . • • prA.Wat:7.kfulto Clot, fat. e CiTayr -411314; IrStat•Watt Daslch Callt-cdritre • ,.. ,F,y 4, 1Q70 Hermosa Reach r i.ty Council Gentlemen,, nrHY NOT consider a city wide pick-up of reclaimable ob sects, such as aluminum, al se !n©n-it turnabl ) bottles and gars? T Understand th kt number of .youth and adult organizations have undertaken proles is af this nature for fined -raising (however minimal) an -3 conservation -minded prrams, C ;rtainiy there must be those who would ret 11re a profTt, from such en endeavor----&nd the South Hey would a t 1caat g v- it time (and apace) in our community garbage disposal. area. .And ooneid r the long range profit of re- cycling a fraction of our tonsumer producte '711Y NOT? et a t consider the pr. ospe^te reeving such a knowledgable person -as Yrs. Wen working on the solutions available for wa ,to d ispaea1 (7 was' most pleased for her lengthy phone discusei®n arising from my written response to to "IG, PARI GWEN plc tic hag dispose. prosiest) 1 in asurod of the iavulrings open. minds ve f lah1 for a sound pl:rsn that not only' benefits nerMoss but the greater community. `3 er°e1Y q ,.a ,fid ,o pdfk come Holy. 9wsse , Calif. Honorable mor City of Hermosa F: Aoh Aormosa k each t California forma Your Honor: .Hay .la D 1970 In the interest oVolarifica,iont we Iwo :.d ppreei&to the naue Aviation boulev :rd to continue through to Pacific Coast Highwayv thus oliminY.tins Real and Fier AvenueQ_ • Thanki you £or your ic on t o B. SCHMOLLE, BUILDING CONTRA(. FORS 5)F3 FIRS T 5 ! RCE T o rek'RMO SA E3F:ACH is ALJFORN:A 110254 • (:' Z1Vi. 3 REA CODE, 213 .... 372 1366 5-14-70 City Council City of Hermosa Beach. Hermosa I, acb, Californna Gent1ewat i A letter addressed to the Bow of Building Appeals of the City of Hermosa Bch, ewer the si tura of City Planner Revert Crsawford, acs.,: refenee to tenants of a property referred d to in th letter as undo si.r::. ,, lead It is opinion the reference is uncalled for and is a judgement rade by an official of the City thst ie in poor taste. Though anyone of j deem a$ folloaman undesirable; when gamed at es an official utterance the otaatiago takes as different kL ht. I personally contacted the ownmr of the spartment.referred to and he assumes rem that he dcs s tot feel y of hie t •: nanta em undesirable. le. • • May8, 1970 TO: 13oard. of Appeal City Planning Commission FROM: Rohe 17,-t E. CrawfoTA, City Planner SUBJECT: Minimum Flze o Divedlino Units - Proposed Ordinance History: Early in, 1969 „, at the time of prepa-eation of the new building . code for adoption, the Building Director suggested that the Planning COMMiSSi011 con.sider revising and raising the MilliMUM dwelling unit sizes, transferring same from the building code to the zoning ordinance. Later in the year, the City Council indicated that present building stan- dards were too lax and that the Commission should consider ways and means to increase the quality of construction in the city. The Planning Commission over a period of nine rnonths, considered, dis- cussed the minimum dwelling -unit sizes eventually recommended to the City Council as one feasible way to partiallyinsure that building quality would not deteriorate below present performance. The City Council referred the Proposal to the Board o,f Appeals which recom- mended the lesser standards now being considered. Analysis: The present ordinance is an amendment to the Building Code, not the Zoning Ordinance. It raises existing standards, but leaves them wel below current building trade practice. ExhibitA, attached, is. an excerpt from the new State law which exempts factory -built housing front building codes, but not from zoning ordinan.ces. If minimum dwelling sizes are left in the Building Code, they will not be. effective against factory -built hoines. The same is true of present metal -exterior and "unusual" structure. regula- tions. If these items were transferred to the Zoning Ordinance, they would remain effective. --2- Exhibit B indicates fou recent apartment complexes and how they relate • to the standards prowsed by the Planning Com -Mission. will be noted that most of the units that are less than Planning Commission recommenda- tions, are only slight/y under. It is also noted that 15 -7 15th Street had considerable difficulty renting out and that 150 Hermosa Avenue is tenanted by "undesirable" unrelated persons. Exhibit 0 lists all the single family dwellings constructed in 1969. Bedrooms are not listed on the permit, and cannot be guaranteed to be accurate. It is felt that they are correct enough to illustrate that only one house -1416 Cam- pana—is less than Planning Commission recommendation. Exhibit D is a copy of the ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission. It is the Commission's desire to discuss these standards at greater depth • with the Board of Appeals along with possible alternatives which will achieve the City •Councilcs stated desire of increasing the quality of residential. devel- opment in the city. • :•"'" . all . , APPLICATION f'FOW.,,,,..ALCO,14101,1C-.8ElfERAGE' LICEINISE(S), • , To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control • ,tt 1215 0 Street it,' A Sacramento; Calif. 95814 , . • ( DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION) , • „ • The,Undeisigqed hereby applies for ..,,,licenses described as follows: .2. -NAME(S) Of; Af7LICANT(S)'0 d . rite Above Thbwilite—icii Hoadq:00"Ori Office Only FILENO *," : •" 4001111 4tv ktO131 C°1 SO° 2 Maok • , 4. Name of Business 3oe s 'rzr n1 Mitt 5. Location of Business -Number and Street L, r r City and lip,Code''. •-'• County - • er S • •`• qn keit). If Premises Licensed, • - I Show Type of 1,1Cense . 8. Mailing Address (if differenfironf-5)-Nurnber and Street .„.. 3. TYPE(S) *OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE. e ' • •• • :a.. • -••• GEOGRApHICAL,-,„ CODE - Issued 's Ternp:-Perro@' . cEffectiVe LIC.. TYPE 1;•Ada 1.11 f,;-• ),rs, • „.: • 1.6613' RECEIPT NO. qint fict 7. Are Premises Inside City Limits? (Temp) (Perm) .. • 9. Have you eVer been‘convicted of a felony? 11.0 .,. 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisicIC'of the Alcoholic ."' Beverage Control Act or regulations . of the, , Department per- , -...4 taining to the Act? 1 , • , 4.„.-, - , • , , , - • 11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. • " , ' , , ' • l'2. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in the business -will have all the qualjfietifigns ciftt 1icenpe, aikilt,(b)Acit he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic. Beverage Control Act. STATE OF •CALIFORNIA -*--County of .1.004. kni;rset _ ' . Under penalty of perjury, each pqrson whose Signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is the applicant o one of he appticants o ah executive officer of the applicant corporatiori,'nomed IP the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on ,its behalf (2) theifie has read the fore- going application and knows the contents thereof and that each and all of the statements therein made are true; (3) that no personother than the applicant or applicants has. any direct or indirectinterest in the applicant's or applicants' business to be conducted under the license(s) for which Thisipplication is made; (4j that the:transfer ajsplicationcti.:proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered -into- more than ninety (90) days preceding the day.op'Vflii0 ,the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain ar establish a preference to or for.anf'Oreditor of transferor or to defratik or injure ony credliorOf transfisrOy.;":0-."' 14., APPLICANT SIGN HERE' (k APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County 'Of ai_41,11.relingD Under penalty of perjury each perion' Nyhose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is the licensee, or an • named in the foregoing transfer Oplication, dilly authorized to make this transfer application on its behalf; (2) that all interest in the attached liceose(s) described below and to transfer same to the applicant and/or location indicated form, if such transfer 15 approvedsby the Director; (3) that the transfew application or proposed transfer is not made 'to an agreement'enterecl into more lhan ninety dais preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with preference to or for any creditor of .transferor or, to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor. 16: Name(s) of Licensee(s) ' 17. SignatUre(s) -of Licensee(s) - -4 18 License Numb ate_ _ eitecutive cifficof.the corporate licensee, he hereby makes tipplication to surrender on the upper' Pdrticitt .of this application the'paym�nt a loan or to fulfill the Department of,..-tii>goiii or establish a •, . • ° / er(s) 1--br E'Cia56102:- ,„ •4:,. • ^ 19. Location Numbeeand Street. City and Zip Code /,-ar, A iV(4111,1rs 4 • Do Not Write Below This.Line; 'For Department Use Only Attached D Recorded nOtute, D fiduciary papers, PIES MAILED._____5 ••• . •• „ • • '. ••",- SEPT 0 otip Do not detach—Return all copies Do Not Write I P, . This Lino -Per Neaiquartors Office Only APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) To: Department. of Alcoholic Beverage Control ,1215 0 Street Sacramento, Calf. 95814 "" 1. NAME(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. 4, *• .A:'' ,� Applied under Sec. 24044 ffective Date: FEE NO. GEOGRAPHICAL CODE ' . (DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION) Date Issued The undersigned hereby applies forrel 1 licenses described as follows: t:. (^, .. Temp. Permit Effective Date: ` , ',A. 2. NAME(S)" OF APPLICANT(S) ' tea& . - ►'IRii 1 Ck-Ep't CIS A . TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE `TYPE LIC. RMuSA $ 4 a�i"6 • = r f 4. Name of Business 5. toeation of Business -Number and Street City and Zip � Code County ii111031t Fa -*'a hjltst" RECEIPT NO. °}'' TOTAL �. 6. If Premises Licensed,, Show Type of License' 8. Mailing Address (if different from 5)—Number and Street 1 tato- et Ar► 1Mt ** +fie let • 7. Are Premises Inside City Limits? 9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? (Temp) (Perm,! 10. -Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcplolic Beverage Control Act or re lotions of the Department per- taining to er-taining-to the Act? 11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. 12. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will, not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1011 County of"` Date Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is the applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the fore- going application+rond knows the contents thereof and that each and all of the statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant's or applicants' business to be conducted under the license(s) for which thisapplicationis mode; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (40) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Departmentorto gain or establish a preference tour for any creditor of transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor. 14. APPLICANT SIGN HERE .' APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of 14'e A ''fie Date_ Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is the licensee, or an executive officer of the corporate licensee, named in the foregoing transfer application, duly authorized to make this transfer application on its behalf; (2) that he hereby makes application to surrender all interest in the attached license(s) described below and to transfer same to the applicant and/or location indicated on the upper portion of this application form, if such transfer is approved by the Director; (3) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish o preference to or for any creditor of transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor. 16. Name(s) of Licensee(s) 17. Signature(s) of Licensee(s) 18. License Numbers; A 19 1 lN giber and Street Do Not Write Below This Line; Attached: '°Recorded notice, F-.. For Department Use Only PO' re ❑ Renewal: FEW of Paid at ABC -211 (11.69) (OTHER) Cit Zi COPIES MAILED Office on Receipt No. _ 37721-704 11-511 10M SEPT O AOsv 1 2 .3 4 6 6 12 14 16 16 18 19 20 21 23 24 2 I ATTEST: 26 27 28 29 30 3L ORDS NCE NO. . 304 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, F, CAAL IFORNIA., CODIFYING ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 357, PROVIDING FOR LICE SINN OIL WELLS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF SAID CITY, AND ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 376, REGARDING REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BWLD1NGILECORDS. THE CITE COUNC OF THE cri ti° OF HERMOSA, BEACH, Ca,LIFORNI DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. N. S. 357, adopted May 20, 1969, of the City of Hermosa. Beach i ., providing for licensing of oil wells within the 1i.tnita be amended to provide that it be codified as Section 17-19.1 of Chapter 17, "Licenses", of the Hermosa Beach City Code. SECTION 2. That Ordirance No. N. S. •376,'adopttd January 6., 1970, regarding Report of Residential Btillding Records be amended to provide that it be codified as Article VIII, Seotiar.s 7-31 through 7-39 of the •.Ierrrtoia Beach City Code. SECTION 3. The City. Clerk is h by di ebted,to cause this ordinance to he published at toast once in the Hermosa i brir h Rao nie+w, a weekly newspaper, of general cLrcul .tion, published d and circulated in the City of Hermosa S hhn SECTION 4. This ordirra e ijhaII take hf: ct'thin-y.(30 days niter the date of its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED:. th w..w.xi +iaorwre a,..pu PROVED AS TO: FORM: . �br,�ciG.-kx v»�ratmke�Y.a�.xmr�wa+wa e8 . kumr PRESIDE.Nl., 04t City +�t$ 31, and ;. ..; +; ilAYO.4P .t :41 3 masa,. Beach ,• California, Nay 14: 1970 TO: Wesley -C. MIDanil. City Nanager FROM John E. Stoveirector of PUblic Woi:k& SIMMJECT: Elimination o Stop Intersection - Pier Avenue at OWOSSO* At their meeting of October 15 19GO: tho City Council was- dbmitted.a report bythisoffice 'which in part recommended. . the,elimination o the 4 -way Stop at Pier Avenueand Owosso Avenue, Thisrecommendation was apvroved by Council actio with the understanding that the Change would become•eggoaive following the inprovement of Pier Avenue. No. that the net/ street•construction is almost completed: it is suggested.that.the attached resolution, which eliminates Owosso Avenue.as a .stop intersection for Pier Avenue traffic Ile approved and adopted.; Sincerel JOHN E. STEVENS Director of PliblicWOrIcs 7ES:jw 1 2 5 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 51 52 RESOLUTEON KO. A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COUNCII4 OP ThE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION VO, N. S. 2435, AS AMENDED, DELETING AND ESTABL2SMINZ CERTAIM STOP INTERSECTIONS AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE A FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resoiu ion No. N. S. 2435 as amended, be, and the same is hereby further amended by amending Section 3.85 to read as follows: "Section 3.65 PIER AVENUE, entrance to intersections with Monterey Boulevard, Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this PRESIDENT of the City Council, -and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FOR.: ••••C••••••••••..1 .........1,111.1a.W•••••••••••••••••••••• CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY /1/ RESOLUTION NO. N.S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DECLARING THE EXISTENCE OF CERTAIN NUISANCES IN SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE ABATEMENT THEREOF. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 39560 ET. SEQ.) SEC'T'ION 1: The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby declare as public nuisances and provides for the abatement thereof the following: All rubbish, refuse, dirt and weeds upon the parkways, -streets, sidewalks or private property in said city, a special reference being hereby made to the following described property: 34t. 33rd St. Longfellow 31st St. 28th St. 27th St. 26thSt. Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Lot 6, Blk 119 Lot 13, Bak 102 Lot 38, Bik 118 Lot 26, Blk 123 Lot 10, Bik 103 Lot 9, Bik 118 Lot 18, Blk 125 Lot 1, Bik 124 Shakespeare SW 15 ft . Shakespeare NE 15 ft Shakespeare, Lot 11, Shakespeare, Lot 25, Bik 125 Shakespeare, Lots 20 & 22, Blk 126 Shakespeare, Lot 24, Bik 126 of lot 10, of lot 10, Bik 104 Blk 105 Blk 105 Shatkeapeare, Bak 127 Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, NE 10 ft of Lot 22 & all of Lot 4, Blk 127 Lot 18, Blk 128 Lot 20, Blk 128 Lot 13, Blk 108 Shakespeare Ex of St Lot 15, Blk 108 Shakespeare, ? Vac St Adj on SE and lots Bak 111. Lot 24, 7& 8, Manhattan First Add to Hermosa Beach NW 6 ft of Lot 5 and all of Lot 5 and all of lot 6, Bik 66 25th St. First Add to Hermosa First Add to Hermosa Tract No 820, Lot 24 Hermosa Terrace Tract, Lot 9, Blk 5 Beach, Lot 11, Blk 28 Beach, Lot 12,. Blk 28 -1- ManhAttmlyft. First Add to Hormosa Beach, Lot 1, Blk 65 Shakespeare, Lot 3, Blk 112 24th St: Hermosa Terrace Tract Lot 11 and Lot Com at most S Cor of Lot 12, Blk 3 Th N 33°08' W 45..04 Ft Th N 58°16' E 26.48 Ft to NE Line of SD Lot Th SE thereon 51.65 Ft. Th W on S Line of SD Lot 25.4 Ft. to Beg Part of Lot 12 Bik 3 Loma Tract No 1868, Lot 8 Tract No 1868, Lot 7 Tract No 767, Lot 25 22nd St. First Add to Hermosa Beach, Lot 18, Bik 30 Monterey First Add to Hermosa Beach, Lot 3, Bik 54 Ba view Tract No 1069, Lot 9 Manhattan Lots 16, 17 and 23 Tract #1125 as Per Bk 17 Pg 141 of Maps and Lots 18 and 19 51k 34 First Add to Her- mosa Beach as Per Bk 1 Pg 59; 60 of Maps Hermosa Ave. First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 6, Bik 33 Pacific Coast Highway 4th St. 1st St. 1st Ct. Hermosa Ave. Second Add to Hermosa Beach Ex of St Lot 18 and S .17.12 Ft Ex of St of Lot 19, Bik 81 Second Add to Hermosa Beach NW 111 Ft Ex of St of Lot 19, Bik 81 First Add to Hermosa Beach SW 36.5 Ft of Lots 23 and 24 Blk 38 Tract #1122, Lot 26 First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 21, Blk 41 Tract #1122, Lot 10 Tract #1122, Lot 11 First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 6, Bak 39 First Add to Hermosa Beach SW 70 Ft of Lots 1 and 2..Blk 38 Tract #1564 Lots 27 and 28 Tract #1564 Lot 29 Tract #1564, Lot 31 Hermosa Ave. First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 12, Blk 36 •Manhattan First Add to Hermosa Beach NE 50 Ft of SE 30 Ft of Lot 16, Blk 35 Palm First Add to Hermosa Beach SW 50 Ft of SE 30 Ft of Lot 16, Blk 35 First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 17, Bik 35 . ... • • • •c, • • • • . • • ".. Manhattan Tract #1075 NE 50 Ft of Lot 13 and NW 20 Ft of NE 50 Ft of Lot 14 Palm Tract #1075 SE 10 Ft of Lot 14 and all of Lot 15 Manhattan Tract #1075, Lot 22 Tract No 1123 Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12 Tract #1074, Lot 2 Tract #1074, Lot 5 Bayview Tract No 1074 Lots 13 and Lot 14 Tract /1074 SW 50 Ft of Lot 22 Tract #1073, Lot 7 L n.don First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 9, Bik 42 First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 10, Blk 42 First Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 13, Bik 42 Bayview Tract #1073, Lot 22 Montere Tract #1074, Lot 25 Tract #1074, Lot 19 Tract #1071, Lot 7 Tract #1072, Lot 3 Loma Tract #1686 Lot 7, Blk J Tract #1677 Lot 6, Blk B Tract $1677 8E 28 Ft of Lot 4, Bik B Cypress Tract #780, Lot 21 Bard Tract #2002 Lot 6, B1k S dress Tract #1677 Lot 3, Bik C Tract #1677 Lot 4, Bik C Tract #2002 Lot 19, Blk U Tract # 2002 Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8 Bik R and Vac St Adj on NE and Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8 and Lots 20, 21, 22 and 23 Bik U. Tract #1686 Lot 1, Bik I Tract #1686 Lot 2, Blk I Ex of Mining Rights Tract 1686 Lot 11, Bik H Ex of Mining Rights Tract 1686 Lot 12, Bak H Ex of Mining Rights Tract 1686 Lot 13, Blk H Ex of Mining Rights Tract 1686 Lot 14, Bik H -3- • • • • , • •I Chi. ress Tract 41686 Lot 12, Blk J th St. 24th Pl. 25th St. 24th St. 17th 14th St. Pier Ave. Hermosa Ave. 30th St. Tract #1686 NE 90 Ft of Lot 13, Blk J Tract #1686 NE 90 Ft of Lot 14 Elk J Hermosa Park Tract that Por of Lot A Adj on N and Lot 8, Bik 1 Hermosa Park Tract that Por of Lot A Adj on N and Lot 9, Blk 1 Hermosa Park Tract Lot 16, Blk 2 Hermosa Park Tract Lot 10, Blk 2 Hermosa Park Tract Lot 11, Blk 2 C. C. Hunts Add to Hermosa Terrace Tract Lot 8 Hermosa Terrace Tract Lot 5, Blk 1 Hermosa Beach Lot 27, Blk 17 Hermosa Beach Lot 25, Blk 16 Hermosa Beach Lot 22, Blk 15 Hermosa Beach Lot 23, Blk 15 Hermosa Beach Lots 22 and 23, Blk 13 Hermosa Beach Lot 11, Blk 3 Southern California Convention Hall and Marine View Park, Lot 133 Longfellow Southern California Convention Hall and Marine View Park,• Lot 109 Gould Terrace Tract # 12554 Ex of St Lot 10 Porter Second Add to Hermosa Beach SE 64.06 Ft Ex of St of Lot 13, Blk 82 Second Add to Hermosa Beach NW 64.06 Ft Ex of St of Lot 13, Blk 82 Second Add to Hermosa Beach Ex of Sts Lot 14, Blk 82 24th Pi. Montmarie Ex of St Lots 6, 7, 8 and all of 9 Bak 2 21st St. Montmare Lot 12, Blk 1 Hermosa View Tract No 1, Lot 23 Hermosa View Tract No 1, Lot 24 Hermosa View Tract No 2, Lot 25 Blk 1 Hermosa View Tract No 2 NE 17 Ft Lot 44, Bak 1 • J ::,1. Pacific Coast Highway Montmarie Ex of St Lot 1, Blk 2 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 2, Blk 2 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 3, Blk 2 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 4, Blk 2 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 5, Blk 2 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 1, Blk 1 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 2, Blk 1 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 3, Elk 1 Montmarie Ex of St Lot 4, Blk 1 Hermosa View Tract #1 Ex of St Lot 18 Hermosa View Tract #1 Ex of St Lot 19 21st St. Hermosa View Tract No 1, Lot 21 Hermosa View Tract No 1, Lot 22 Hermosa View Tract No 1, Lot 23 Ardmore Hermosa View Tract #2 SE 102.18 Ft of.Lot 32 and SE 102.18 Ft measured on NE Line of lot 33, Blk 1 Pacific Coast Hi hg way Second Add to.Hermosa Beach 1 more or less AC NW 21.88 Ft Ex of St of Lot 14 . and Ex of St Lot 15, Blk 81 16th St. Tract No 9203 Ex of St Lot 1 .Pacific Coast Highway Second Add to Hermosa Beach NE 202 Ft of SW 290 Ft of Lot 38 Blk 78 Second Add to Hermosa Beach Ex of St Lot 28 , Blk 78 Ardmore Tract #451 Lot 31 Tract #451 Lot 29 Tract #451 Lot 30 r3 d St, Tract #451 Lot 21 Cochise Tract #451 SE 70 Ft of Lot 14,and SE 70 Ft measured on NE Line of Lot 15 Tract #451 NW 30 Ft of Lot 14 and NW 30 Ft measured on NE Line of Lot 15 Tract #451 SE 45 Ft measured on NE Line of Lot 16 and SE 45 Ft of Lot 17 Tract #451 NW 55 Ft measured on NE Line of Lot 16 and NW 55 Ft of Lot 17 Tract #451 Lot 18 -5- A • •;• .:,., . • • ..y..;,1!..fl• frCfT „tT;•.;.:, ; • • • j! • • I' • • . • • • A• •'; • • . , • , , • ".1:;. . . 2nd St. Tract #256 Lot 10 and SW 15 Ft of Lot 11 Ardmore Walter Ransom Cos Venable Place Lot 105 2nd St. Walter Ransom Cos Venable Place Lot 104 lst Place Walter Ransom Cos Venable Place Lot 119 Ardmore Walter Ransom Cos Venable Place Lot 131 Walter Ransom Cos Venable Place Lot 133 Ardmore Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lot Com at most W Cor of Lot 131 W.R. Cos Venable Place Th S 13°26' E to SE Line of Lot 41 Blk 78 Th. SW thereon to NE omitted Portion in Assessors Map Book to Beg Part of Lot 41 Blk 78 Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lot Com at most S Cor of Lot 133 W.R. Cos Venable Place Th SW on NW Line of First St to NE Line of Spur Tract No 1 Desc in omit- ted Portion in Assessors Map Book Lot 41 Blk 78 Second Add to HermosaBeach Lot Com at Intersection of S.W. Line of AT and SF RY Spur #1 with NW line of Ardmore Ave Th SW on SD NW Line 80 Ft Th N 14°34" W Omitted Portion in Assessors Map Bork Lot 4, Bik 77 Ex of Mining Rights SBE Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lot Com at Intersection of SE Line of Ardmore Ave with W Line of Spur Tr #2 Desc in Or 2759-18 to AT & SF RY Co Th NE on SD) omitted Portion in Assessors Map Book Lot 42, Blk 78 Second Add to Hermosa Beach that part W of AT and SF RY Spur #2 of Lot 42, Bik 78 1st St. Ex of Mining Rights Walter Ransoms Cos Venable Place Lot 153 Ex of Mining Rights Walter Ransoms Cas Venable Place Lot 152 Ex of Mining Rights W.R. Cos Venable Place Lot 148 W.R. Cos Venable Place SW 30 Ft measured on NW Line of Lot 146 W.R. Cos Venable Place Lot 147 Trafton Heights Lot 15 Trafton Heights Lot 16 Trafton Heights Lots 34 & 35 Barney Ct. Trafton Heights Lot 24 -6- 1st Pl. Tract #1802 Lot 18 Tract #1802 Lot 9 1st St. Tract #1802 Lot 43 Tract #1802 Lot 44 Tract #1802 Lot Com at most S Cor of Lot 42 Th N N 68°45' E 12.5 Ft Th N 16°57' W to -N Line of SD Lot Th S 74046' W 12.47 Ft Th S 16°57' E 99.38 Ft to Beg Part of Lot 42 find Home Builder Place Lot 30 Home Builders Place SE 45.69 Ft of Lot 7 mrd St. Mission Tract as Per Bk 8 Pg 15 of Maps Lot 15 Mission Tract as Per Bk 8 Pg 15 of Maps Lot 40 Mission Tract as per Bk 8 Pg 15 of Maps Lot 71 Mission Cract as per Bk 8 Pg 15 of Maps Lot 73 Hopkins Hopkins Tract Being a Sub of Lot 4 Blk 86 Second. Addto Hermosa Beach Lot 7 Pacific Coast Highway Ocean View 5th St. Hopkins Tract Being a Sub of Lot 4 Blk 86 Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 5 Hopkins Tract Being a Sub of Lot 4 21k 86 Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 6 Hurds Ocean View Tr Lot 13 Garden View Lot 2 Second Add to Hermosa Beach SE 130 Ft of NE 87 Ft of SW 93 Ft of Lot 11, Blk 85 Prospect Hopkins Sub of Lot 5 Blk 86 Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 10 Pacific Coast Highway Wilson & Lind's Tract Lot 18. and NW 10 Ft of Lot 19 Wilson & Lind's Tract Lots 14, 15 and 16 112 14?.- Wilson & Lind's Tr Lot 29 Wilson & Lind's Tr Lot 30 8th St. Wilson and Lind's Tr Lot 7_ Pier Tract #8519 Lot 1 Tract #8519 Lot 2 llth St. Redondo Villa Tract Lot 10, Blk 148 Prospect Redondo Villa Tract Lot 1, Blk 144 Redondo Villa Tract Lot 2, mak 144 Redondo Villa Tract Lot 3, Blk 144 Redondo Villa Tract Lots 1 and 2, Blk 140 ulorietta Villa Tract Lot 1 -7- 8th St. Redondo Villa Tract Lot 20, Bik 143 7th St. Redondo Villa Tract Lot 50 & 51, Bik 139 Gent Dillon Tract Lot 22 9th St. Redondo Villa Tract Lots 62 and 63, Bik 143 Prospect Redondo Villa Tract Lot 6, Blk 144 Pacific Coast Highway Heffner Fiorini Allen Tract SE 67.5 Ft of Lot 1 Prospect 14th St. Prospect Golden 19th St. 20th St. Corona Bonnie Brae Ocean Drive Heffner Fiorini Allen Tract SE 67.5 Ft of Lot 2 Wm. J. Smith Tr Lot 1, Blk 2 Wm. J. Smith .Tr Lot 2, Bik 2 Wm. J. Smith Tr Lot 3, Blk 2 Walter Ransom Cos Redondo Home Tract Lots 46 and 47 Tract No 1562, Lot 11 Hermosa Heights Tract Being Lot 14, Bik 84 and Part of Lot 7, Bik 88 of second Add to Hermosa Beach NE 2.5 Ft of Lot 74 and All of Lots 75 and 78 and SW 12.5 Ft of Lot 79 E.B. Smith's Replat Lot Com at Most E Cor of Lot 56 Th N 54°19' W 59.52 Ft Th S 76°34' W 142.05 Ft Th S 13°26' E 45 Ft Th NE on SW Line of SD Lot 181 Ft to Beg Part of Lot 56 Tract No 1562, Lot 41 Tract No 1562 Lots 22 and 23 Walter Ransom Cos Redondo Home Tract. Lot 172 Walter Ransom Cos Redondo Home Tract NE measured on NW and SE Lines of Lot 173 Walter Ransom Cos Redondo Home Tract Lot 145 Walter Ransom Cos Redondo Home Tract Lot 146 Walter Ransom Cos Redondo Home Tract Lot 100 Hermosa Heights Tract Being Lot 14, Blk 84 and Part of Lot 7 Bik 88 of Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lot 13 Hermosa Heights Tract Being Lot 14, Blk 84 and Part of Lot 7 Blk 88 of Second Add to Hermosa Beach Lots 34 and 37 G.G. Allens Sub Lot 7, Blk 1 G.G. Aliens Sub Lot 5,Blk 2 G.G. Allens Sub Lot 3, Blk 2 Bonnie Brae 14th St. G.G. Aliens Sub Lot 6, Blk 2 G.G. Allens Sub Lot 7, Bak 2 Hermosa Knob Hill Tract Lot 7, Bik 2. Hermosa Knob Hill Tract Lot 9, Blk 1 Hermosa Knob Hill Tract Lot 10 and SW 25 Ft of Lot ll, Blk 1 Hillcrest Tract #2548 SE 50 Ft of Lots 27 and 28 18th St. Pacific Coast Highway 9th St. Johnson & Newmans Camino Real Tract Lot 25, Bik 1 Tract No 8476, Lot 6 Second Add to Hermosa Beach SW 50 Ft of NE 220 Ft of SE 108.12 Ft of Lot 7, Bik 78 r3 d St. Mission Tract as per Bk 8 Pg 15 of Maps Lot 25 Prospect Mission Tract as Per Bk 8 Pg 15 of Maps Lot 27 and 29 Beginning at the NE Cor of Lot 5 thence S 76°34" W 345' thence S 13°26e E 112.2' thence N 76°34" E 348.14' to Prospect Ave., thence N 16°55" W 112.2' Parallel to the Point of Beginning, Except that Portion of Lot 5 Beginning at the NE corner of Lot 5, thence S 16°55" E on the E Line of Lot, 52.5' to the true point of beginning thence continuing S 16°55" E along said E Line 60' thence S 76°34" W 125', thence N 16°55" W 60', thence N 76°34" E 125', to the true point of. beginning Lot 5, Blk 83 2nd Add to Hel7nosa Beach SECTION 2 The reference herein contained refers to the various streets by their commonly known names and does describe the property upon which or in front of which the nuisance exists by giving lot and block number according to the official map of said properties and as more particularly hereinabove set forth. SECTION 3z That the Superintendent of Streets, upon passage of this resolution, shall cause notices to be conspicuously posted on or in front of the property on or in front of which the nuisance exists in'the manner and form described in Section 39564, 39565, 39566 and 39567, 0 + • i r SECTION It: That the City Council hereby orders and declares the hearing of objections by any interested person to any of the matters hereinabove set forth shall be and is hereby set for Tuesday, May 18, , 1970 at 7:30 P.M. of said City in the Council Chamber, of the City Hall of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this Day of , 1970. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California • ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Wea1e_ _.,. City of Hermosa X eaeb Hermosa Beach, California 9 '.0 1970 Dear Mr. McDaniel: I hereby eta0 Assistant City ,Mager. `l is 'resignation shall be effective as of May ',1st,: 1970. It has. bee e pleasure serving the City of Hermosa Beach tar, the Paat eleven years. mnx.17.10 t2weia::'.p cm.aassxc�c, .s-ca+z.-xn:x^•.r._sr,'nns�..icim;.r..-•,+_ .•.• . _. . i o:t.. . 14t5p troolvatmatraxeriMIWOWAttrZomAnal Ka>y' 14, 1970 tr., Wesley Ce McDaniel, C a ' Manager City of Rer osa • Beach j ect I Resignation Dear Wes; n PROBE: 6.01354', Brima'vaa rave _cc'tse.=112.am a;mrtoe:.mAas Almost t e zacly9 a decade , o, 1 came to tic r a Beach a the City':5 first full. time City Engineer. The jab was tun. of prorr .se ,hhe City was. ripe for ouch imzovement and waa primed with challenge. Now, ten years later, lodk &k upon the years.' c l sb.mente, many of uhici only 4 LW personaare awavec accepting a new Challenge wit '' IIT'e mIned emotiono. live been offered and have e tccep{ the position of Aasist. irtt. Director of Public Works fOr the City of Sang Ana 2t is with excitant that .X loo Zorward to w ;k ng with a large active organizatioA '411,,Ch ,p4ariltd igth the r . pon€ bill. y 'of providing fog' e. i° i , . ilk t w` -of a ralitay erpa04119 community, yet ;;t .Is Tit o ,€ s remorse a;� ; iOe Hermosada etch with vo t y t reami and vision st .1 :F r£ z ,- raI3 ? i fa .dim nId ` 11 r °1i 1 ? mem ' ', ,! same cralkAla aad ^att'1 pavements: tit+ eve ' e amu t. }1; • to curb return; c . over them '. X s t5G dirt It i f.Gionni.4" l de tae tIrbless sztreetm .But thenXlook agaln. 1see parki- otai, aorae ntreet' iipproVement downtowne, a, my fish ,ns. pi earn a am l g rar 'e a new city' hall, v" : a.ous garb . nd L r a :4Ven ; mTpr o f liQi+Pkk'Cs , neu m ree w1ihaiTg„ undred&n64 ! ''.tp'vn1. b O feet of tof net pavement or curb ArFe illknow Cj3rvneNtoor unes have been piaced to el.iminegte .c 1, prcblems and to pkeptwo for ._ tore ' -pan ions; and 1 smile iy t. jatisfaction that .the Pub it Works c 4o can now Sim the night during . a heavy rain storm because news ing have elimintted Mr. ® Wear C Daniel, City Mme er .'R. signat to John E. Stevens MAY. 141, 1970 Page - 2 the many . prdblems and worries tUt were 040pomitant with rain. Yes,if one viii but estandbaok Aftd'10k0 e .l.' see that the City h c a long ay IA $ �_ :_ t pry and I am weary to have K a a part 'o itch bg. . about the Ohanges. . I. tender my resignation, rOalisve that .ehe my duti to a .successor , : inter° tr para t� c,: done in 1 ..stea: Z. have a e £ :the OLty dg git starting ,da of ;July. 1st. '.. Wit. E' short Vacation bade jobs, I mid like to t service with ap,vmosaon Fane 1Sth. *OW. that ti N, • viii be Saorking to:tte.up :ice ends and clean : out dead wood that might only tdieguse a new. Director. I want to Personally thank.you:Woso fOr. the cloSe: cooperation, friendship . and Support which you have gid eh Vie over the past two. years. Pease : dona t hesitate _ call, km forr. "loot infor- mation" after i am gon Sincereiyo JOHN E. STEMS Director.. iic May 12p 1970 Honorable Mayor and City Coil City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa =:-.reecho California' Res Deputy City Treasurer Gentleman As you probably naw, w s0 Margaret McDonald,' who now mots a Deputy City Troasurero will be leaving the City° = o+=plo z mat at the end of May* I proposa9 at that tisee to appoint Mrs, Mari A* Botoone Deputy City Treasurer* As you know Mrs0 :.,,t,r one i lung time and responsible employee rho has baokound in the fiscal operation of the City* fro Trott p her supervisory agrees to this appointnt. It is requestd that you ortond the current appropriation of tmenty-fi r dollars per month for this responsibility to Mrs* Betoana0 Very truly youre e 9Y72 '�.- 2,ce �J AA.Rir Ro STONIER City Treasurer City of Hermosa Ba oh /*Sens FUND NUMBER GENERAL ACCOUNT 100 200 500 600 800 -900 1000 1200 1700 1800 1900 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CITY TREASURER'S REPORT APRIL 1970 General Adv.- Music & Pks. Light District Traffic, Safety Parking Meters State Gas Tax County G*oa Tax Retirement Parks . Recreation Sewer -Maintenance TRUST FUNDS Sewer Deposit Street Bond Payroll Account Refuse & Sanit. Supt. of Streets VPD Bond .Int & Debt BALANCE 4/1/70 $.58,520.04 6,342.60 17,210.18 4,072.96 20,838.42 50$9514.27 3,188.33 21,766.88 20,296.33 12,685.19 46,359.33 719,794.53 RECEIPTS CASH TRANSFERS DISBURSEMENTS WARRANTS TRANSFERS. $176,809.92 1,039.96 1,086.45 3,599.60 49923.36 12,995.97 39951.85 3,327.87 29079.92 1,039.96 210,854.86. 4/1/70 RECEIVED $ 2,200.00. 7,313.63 1,011.25 6,419.14. 4,429.65 23,606.01 449979.68 1,500.00 216.36 109,332.39 1,356.06 200.00. 2,027.73 114,632.54 TIME 'DEPOSITS INTEREST RECEIVED THIS FISCAL YEAR MAR May il, 1970 $81,445.68 $167,934.85 6,342.60 17,210.18 4,072.96 20,838.42 308.02 7,946.03 - 20,296.33 - 12,685.19 81,445.68 176,188.90 81 445.68 PAID $ 800.00 109,332.39 6,419.14 600.00 117,151.53 BALANCE 4/30/70 $148,840.79 1,039.96 1,086.45 3,599.60 49923.36 521,202.22 3,188.33 17,772.70 3,327.87 2,079.92 479399.29 7549460.49 4/30/70' BANK BALANCES General 57,359.81 Sewer Deposit 3,098.25 St. Bond 79530.4 Payroll :Acct.. 8,377.86 Refuse & Sanit. 1,356.06 Supt. of Sts. 4,029.65 VPD Bond Irt. 2,800.35 84,552.82: Less-Outsd. Cks. 1 631.6 glip 921.1 Time Deposits 7184000.00 796,921J - $ 2,900.00 7, 52999 1,011.25 1,356..06 4,029.65 25,633.74. 42,460.69 RECAP OF ALL FUNDS: General Active. Other. Active' Time Deposits $40,813.60 $499460.49 1 460.6 66 921.18 728,000.00 7969921.18. DEMANDS AND WARRANTS - May 19, 1970 Amo ni.t Issued to: 7205 ABCO Disposal = Agreement $ 277.69 7206 ALCO Chemical - Park Supplies 78 54 7207 All American Uniform - Weekly Service 204000 7208 ARMCO Supply Co. - Publics Works Equipment 1,403.88 7209 Barnes & Delaney - Public Works Supplies 165067 7210 William Ho Berlin = Expenses 39004 7211 Don Bosley = Expenses 150000 7212 Calif. Correctional Industries a Police Dept. Uniforms 1.05053 7213 Calif. Water Service 9 Monthly Bill 1,093034 7214 William J. Cavenaugh - Motorcycle Leasing 1.00000 7215 Chadwick Gardens Order from the City Clerk 13013 7216 City of Redondo Beach -- Quarterly Billing 118007 7217 Coast Chrysler Plymouth - Services Rendered Police Dept. 1.39.45 7218 Cotton & Francisco a Services Rendered 275000 7219 County of Los Aweless _< .Agreement 553.70 7220 County Sanitation Districts ro Contract 136069 7221 Dearth Machinery Company o Parts Public Works Dept0.: 4.1079 7222 Easterday Supple Co..o Public Works 4057 7223 Federal Communication Comm. Operator Permit Fire Dept 4000 7224 Donald C. Finley.- Expenses 12000 7225 Clifford D. Fowleir. ETenses 30000 7226 Rachel Gaines ® Uniform Allowance 40000 7227 General Electric Co. e Light Meter Public Works Dept. 315000 7228 General Telephone - Monthly Billing 1,666019 7229 Goodhew Ambulance - Services Rendered 178000 7230 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. - Tires Police Department 67070 7231 Jim Gordon Art Services 65000 7232 Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce o Agreement 1,166000 7233 Hermosa Bead Lawn Bora]ing.=Contract 100004 7234 Hermosa Electric - Supplies City Clerk 3009 7235 Hermosa Florer Shop - Void 7236 IBM Eleotrie .Tupemr ter Div. o Office Equipment 1,176o 53 7237 Imperial We Medical Center Services Rendered 532.50 7238 Inglewood Fire Department - Recruit Training Fire dept. 700000 7239 Lawndale Concrete; Products - Public Works Supplies: 185039 7240 Lewelien Press - Printing Police Department 192.94 7241 Livingston Graham - Monthly Bill 183072 7242 Los Angeles Tiues,e Advertising 22080 7243 Richard L. Madden, .- Services Rendered Recreation Dept. 148000 7244 Manhattan Car:: Wash Agreement 8.75 7245 Don Murray Photo. Services 34050 7246 Peach Officers Assoc. Lao Co. =Insurance Police De�otro 712004 7247 Postmaster Mailing Permit Newsletter 2114000 7248 Postmaster Fire' Department 72.10 7249 R & 5 Garage Monthly Bill 2100 7250 Realty Tax ;Service :- Contract 25.00 7251 Savin Business. Ma©hines Corp. o Officce Supplies 137010 7252 Claude Short Dodge a Recreation & Public Works Equipment 8,753.14 7253 Void 7254 Soo Bay Fire :Extinguisher Co. m Equipment Police Dept. 105059 7255 Soo Bay Hospital. a Services Rendered 57.50 7256 So, Bay Peblishing Co. - Legal Advertising 143050 7257. Soo Cal Edison Monthly Bill 649069 7258 So. Cal. Gas = Monthly Bill 82042 7259 Soo Cal. Organic Fertilizer - Recreation Supplies.. 162.75 7260 So. Cal. Planning Congress - Membership 35.00 DEMANDS AND WARRANTS _ May 19, 1970 Issued to: Amount 7261 Sportsv illi U S A - Supplies Police Department 26000 7262 Korvin J0 Stafford Services Rendered 25000 7263 Sterling Home Electronics m Supplies City Planner 15.12 7264 Sunray Auto - Supplies Police Department .17.01 7265 Supreme Paint - Paint Supplies Public Works Department .59018 7266 3K Business Prod. o Monthly Bill 161098 7267 3111 Business Prod. - Supplies Police Department 40011 7268 Traffic Appliance - Public Works Equip. 15.75 7269 Tzarfgrass Conference m'Conference Expenses 35.00 7270 14 1 Tullis o Public Works Supplies OM 7271 Union Oil Coo.Con Contract 28035 7272 Wray Printing ® Printing ng Services 80033 7273 Dept. of Beaches. w= Contract 300000 7274 Soo Bay Daily Breeze. _ Advertising 7.80 7275 M H. McDonald ® Services Rendered 390094 7276 Conti notal Vinyl Police Department Supplies 128.00 7277 Weddle Woodcraft - .Police Department Supplies 149090 7278 Soa. Bay Office - : Aonthly Bill 146004 7279 Phillip Krug Services Rendered 403000 7280 %earned. Lumber Monthly Bill 731.23 7281 Merritt Hardware Monthly Bill 106061 7282 Lee F. Pierce -.Services Rendered 19200.00 7283 Steve Burgess . Services Rendered 50.00 7284 Chris Quayle - Servicee Rendered Recreation Dept. 50.00 7285 Dorothy Robert,son Services Rendered Recreation Deito 46.24 7286 Renee Taylor Services Rendered Recreation Dept. 200000 7287 Ted Wegener Services Rendered Recreation Dept 125.00 7288 Hermosa Beach City School Dist. - Student Luncheons :9060 7289 Valerie Anderson Refund. Recreation Department 20.00 7290 Gloria Prooz-.'Servioes Rendered Recreation Dept'. 91000 7291 Harry Steer° m Services Rendered Recreation Dept.. , 9028 7292 ASDA Sales '_ Equipment Reccre:.tion Dspt0 1,426.38 7293 Kerley Sporting Goods = Equipment Recreation Dept.. 170.88 7294 Harry Steere Services Rendered Recreation Dept. 0.46.39 7295 Jess Lame Petty Cash 35..00 7296 General Telephone Installation for Police Dept. •58.70 7297 Nodernage d Supply & Service for Election 2;016916 7298 A3. Valdes - Refund d. Candidates Statement 6.75 7299 Jack Wise = RefUnd Candidates Statement 6.75 7300 Mike PO Bigo Jr. . Refund Candidates Statement 6.75 7301 Robert Currie Refund Candidates Statement 6075 7302 Walter Davis - Refund Candidates Statement : 6075 7303 Joe Be Noble - Refund Candidates Statement 6075 7304 Hank Doerfling . Reid Candidates Statement 6075 7305 John Power ® Refund Candidates Statement ' 6.75 7306 Peter Watters - Refund Candidates Statement 6.75 7307 Sinclair Koppers Co.• - Plastic Bag Trash 270027 7308 Shell Oil Co. m Contract 750o79 7309 Title Insurance 8. Trust - Public Works 40000 7310 Hermosa Flower Shop Flowers For Donna Weber 10.50 329213026 NON -AGENDA ITEMS - INFORMATION - With Agenda for May 19, 1970 Available from Office of the City Clerk: Ci f El Monte - Resolution expressing objection to substantial salary adjustments for personnel of the Sheriff's Department and County Fire Department made by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors at a time other than at the commencement of the Fiscal Year -- adopted April 13., 1970. Public Utilities Commission - Notice of Prehearing Conference, June 4, 1970 - Applicataon of General Telephone Company for authority to increase its rates and charges for telephone service - to define issues. Notice of Prehearing Conference -- June 8, 1970 Application of The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company for authority to increase charges applicable. to telephone services furnished within the State of California -- to formulate issues and schedule dates for hearings. Interim Opinion - Investigation on Commission's own motion into the Rules Pertaining to Underground Extensions to Commercial and Industrial Develop- ments and to Individual Customers of all Electric and Communication . Public Utilities in the State of California -- "U ndergrounding.. should be the...:. standard for all extensions . " MEETINGS AND OTHER EVENTS: Improve ent Conrnassion -- Thursday, May 14 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p. Beautification Awards Committee Inter -Citi Fra'. by av Co ittee .-, Thursday, May 14 - Lawndaie - 6:30 p.m. Garden Club Plant Sale - Friday, May 15 - Pier Avenue Mall - 10 aim. -6 p .m Southwest Area PlanningCemen - Friday, May 15 - Lobster House - Noon International Institute of MuniglEs. Clerks - May 17-21 - Atlantic City, New Jersey - Traymore Hotel -- 609-344-3621. Planning Commission -• Monday, May 18 - Council Chamber - .7:30 p.m. Ci Cou�rscil - Tuesday, May 19 -. Council ChaMber - Work Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting - 7:30 p.m. Beach Development Committee -- Thursday, May 21 -- Council Chamber -- 7:30 p.m. Friends of the Library Libation - Saturday, May 23 - 4 to 7 p.m. Chamber of Commerce Installation Dinner - Saturday, May 23 - Lococo's -. Cocktail Hour - 6:30 p.m.. - Dinner 8:00 p.m. EoaEd of zoning Ad juatment _. Monday, May 25 - Counci l Chamber -- 7:30 p.m. Civil Service Commission Tuesday, May 26 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Park and Recreation Commission - €nrednesday, May 27 - Council Charberr - .8 p.m. Coordinatim Council Luncheon - Thursday, May 28 -- Ricardo' s - Noon Youth Advisory Council •- Thursday, May 28 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m.. South &y Cauncilmen's Association - Thursday, May 28 - L000co's - 6:30 p.m. West Basin Water Association - Thursday, May 28 - Palos Verdes Country Club - 6:30 p.m. MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY - Friday, May 29 Planning Commission -- Monday, June 1 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. PRIMARY ELECTION - Tuesday, June 2 Gi ty Council - Wednesday, Jure 3 -- Council Chamber - Work Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting - 7:30 p.m.