Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/04/70
R: 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOR1I f90254 AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Tuesday, August 4, 1970 - 7:30 p.m. Council Chamber - City Hall - Civic Center PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 21, 1970. 1. PUBLIC HEARING - PROTEST AND APPEAL - VARANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 144-148 LYNDON STREET - Board of Zoning Adjustment Resolution B.Z.A. 154-20, adopted June 8, 1970 - Continued from July 7 and July 21, 1970. a. Letter dated July 20, 1970, from Mr. Kenneth Komick, potential buyer and developer; b. Letter of opposition dated July 30, 1970, from Mrs. Patricia A. Gazin, 17 - 7th Street.. 2. PUBLIC HEARING - WEED AND RUBBISH ABATEMENT PROGRAM, 1970 - Additional Listing - Certifying Resolution No. N. S. 2976, adopted July 21, 1970, and authorizing abatement and removal of weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt on all parcels of property set forth therein. 3. APPLICATION FOR ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - MR. C's, 8 and 12 Pier Avenue -, David D. and Eleanor C. Connors. Piano Entertainment, 4. NON -AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS - City Council. 5, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES: a. Underground Utilities Advises Committee - Report re meeting of July 14, 1970. b. Improvement Commission - (1) Trash Control Report; (2) Annual Outdoor Art Show - October 4, 1970. c. Civil Service Commission - Vacancy. d. Pacific Coast alghway_ImpE2y2T!nt Team. 6. COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC: Tin Can Tree, 2908 Manhattan Avenue - Letters of opposition from Mr. and Mrs. Carl Kiudjian, 204 - 29th Street; Anonymous, post- marked Inglewood, California - Letters of support from Mrs. Ray Hundertmark, 514 Anderson Street, Manhattan Beach; Mrs. Marie T. Bunker, 1134 - 19th Street. b. Traffic Hazards, intersection of Pier Avenue and Valle Drive/ Ardmore Avenue - Letter dated July 26, 1970 from Mr., Charles S. Brockway, 1016 Strand. c. Painting for Public 1.422Kau - Letter from Mr. Arthur Balchen, 1040 Manhattan Avenue, dated July 23, 1970. ) City Council - August 4, 1970 -2- 7. OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS 12,2E1E2nt_of Alcoholiq Beverme Control - Letter dated July 24, 1970, reporting withdrawal of application far sale of alcoholic beverages - Daniel L. Held, Rumbleseat, 530 Pacific Coast Highway. 0 NON -AGENDA ITEMS FROM AUDIENCE - Fifteen Minute Discussion Period. 9 ARDMORE AVENUE PARKING REPORT - City Manager. 10. SANITATION FEE REPORT - City Manager. 0 SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 69-1 - Agreement with City of Redondo Beach; Easterly portions of Seventh and Eighth Streets. 7% .r 12. ZONE CHANGE - PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE BETWEEN FOURTEENTH STREET AND PIER AVENUE - From Single -Family Residential and General and Highway Commercial to R-1 and C-3 with Multiple -Family Residential Potential - Ordinance No. N. S. 387 introduced July 21, 1970 - For adoption. 13. ZONE CHANGE - PROPERTY LOCATED ON ARDMORE AVENUE, BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND FIRST PLACE - From Manufacturing to Manufacturing with Multiple -Family Residential Potential - Ordinance No. N. S. 386, introduced July 21, 1970 - For adoption. 14. SEWER CONNECTION FEE - Ordinanc No. M. S. 389, introduced July 21, 1970 - For adoption. 15. MISCELLANEOUS REPORT - City Manager. 16. DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. AWOURNMENT August 4, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Appeal of Board of Zoning Adjustment's Approval of a Request -for Variances on Lots Located at 144-148 Lyndon Street, Gentlemen: The City Planning Commission has initiated a study of the subject area rela- tive to implementing the General Plan. In this respect: 1, The Land Development Sub -committee is inviting all property owners to a meeting August 110 1970 in the Council Chambers., 2 The General Plan shows high rise motel -tourist comm. ercia/ uses. 3. The R -P zone deliberately does not allow apartment development of small lots. 4, The Commission is considering requesting a moratorium on new residential development in this specific area pending resolution of the precise plan. 5. The proposed continuous curb cut on Herondo (aided by a previous variance granted to these same parcels) could be highly detrimental to Herondo traffic., We respectfully suggest that the Board of Zoning Adjustment did' not have benefit of complete knowledge of the above when it considered this request. We request that this item be returned to the Board of Zoning Adjustment, and if same is done, we, the Planning Commission are ready to meet with the Board of Zoning Adjustment, the property owners„ and ail interested citizens to explain in depth the planning program for this area. Sincerely, JOE B. NOBLE Chairman, Planning Commission JBN:mm August 4, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: V‘esley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Ardmore Avenue Parking Study Gentlemen: A new development has recently come forth which will have a significant impact upon the question of proper parking and speed regulations on Ardmore Avenue. This is the request by the County Flood Control District to close Valley Drive south of Second Street on approximately August 15 for a four- week period in order to construct a major underground structure in conjunction with a tunnel which they are commencing running easterly under the hill at the eastern edge of our city. This tunnel is the key element inu a major contract under the last flood control bond issue, and fill from the portal opened next to Ardmore will probably be used for the Herondo project. The plan is to cross Valley Drive in order to construct the sub -surface facility, routing all traffic two ways on Ardmore. Upon completion of the Valley Drive portion, it will be placed on two-way traffic and Ardmore will be closed in order to complete the same construction across that street. We feel that these two temporary closures give us an ideal opportunity to study and experiment with the resulting traffic flow on both Valley and Ardmore, and will give us much better information upon which to base future decisions involving the widening or other improvement considerations of either of these streets throughout the length of the city., 1,A e are looking forward to these two closures in order to observe the traffic behavior and its effects, and are mak- ing provisions for special traffic counts and radar speed checks. It is our recommendation that approval be given to temporarily posting all of Ardmore Avenue south of Pier to the city limits for "No Parking" at any time, in order to facilitate this increased traffic flow. During this period, we will also be able to view the effects, at the conclusion of the period, when traffic is returned to Valley Drive, we will be in a position to make a permanent report and recommendation to the City Council on both parking and speed control. Respectfully, W ES LEI C. MC DANIEL City Manager WCM:mrn July 209 1970 Honorable F yor9enten melon a City Counoi.l on The City of H mos Beach Hermosa B achy California, 90254 a Hargrave coZ+Variance B.Z.A. 154° Dear Sirs, • I r ve reviewed they park$ ng plan submitted t, me at the last meeting by Conncilman Wise. Although it is of interest t it creates certain problems to ..Xo that I will explain. Urging councilman Wise's concept nine unite could be built however the utilization of the ground level for parking would require an :�.ddltion7al twenty percent, at the minimums in,oenstruction costs. This is due to the heavier construction, steel asupports and so forth. This extra cost is paid for by a larger building loan.o and at the present time the lends rsowith whon kava tanked, feel the that the projected rents on a completed building at this location would be inadequate to support the loan L! i thIn sound risk factors, In short they are not interested in makln,:. a building loan on this mtzpenslve a building in this aroe. I can h wever9 procerxd with tho original proposal as submitted because a construction ion loan was approved. I' 9 ,0,. not adverse to const- ructing .rq type buildtnge however there are these other consideration3 whioh I Qt1i sure you and „ rstand. In ofiming to your decision there are -Om r l thoughts that seem important. 3y allowing this building project that I propose, you will be taking oro st;p toward improving the scatherly section of the city. It will help property value►» and. existing owners will also be able to increase their rental incomes. `hese two factors ' alone will cause lend - ere to have a favorable attitude toward tature projects in that area. Please consider this as only one step in the total picture This small improvement can lead to much larger developments. In consid ring curb outs I Fn sure serine noticed that Hercndo Street is already at l.;N:oat eighty five percent curb cut torr.'.. Parking will always be a problem at the beach, regardless of your decision on this property. Sin. erell , T HUNTSMAN MAL, srarrewv iceoath RolaA e* 201 N. SEPULVEDA BLVD. MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90266 TELEPHONE 372.211 S AREA CODE 213 17 Seventh St. Hermosa Seac , Calif. July 30 $97O City Council Hermosa Beaoho Calif. Honorable Gentlemenl � oat earnestly advise that you doh .«I a var at 144-148 14yndon St. My is an area which, to put it obaritablyt has not realised its full potenti -1 of beauty. To imor'oans the population dorso ;ty of this neighborhood will rOvu,t in pushing it even further from its goal. One of thk long tern objectives of this atty 1e to enhance ance its beauty by decreasing its population dtmaityn aging our standards by permitting four mite wiaeloe only two should be a will be a dist otcy beekvardm X')00;11;t1Ily e �. GatTlin trioia PUBLIC HEARING - PROTEST AND APPEAL VARIANCE GRANTED BY BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT - Property located at 144-148 Lyndon Street - B.Z.A. 154-20, adopted June 8, 1970 - Continued from July 7, 1970. DISCUSSION - The public hearing was reopened by Mayor Thelen, and in reply to a question from Mr. Roy Lyon, 160 - 1st Street, Councilman Wise stated that this variance would affect only two pieces of property in this. tract. Mr. Kenneth Komick, 107 Pacific Avenue, Manhattan Beach, tentative purchaser of the subject property then informed the Council that he had studied the revised parking facility recommended by Councilman Wise and Councilman Valdes following their meeting with owners of adjacent properties, and that although he found merit in the concept it would require additional investment and it would not be possible for him to acquire an increased building loan due to the risk factors involved. Fie added that he bad been unable to find any alternative to his original parking facility plan that was economically feasible. As no one else wished to speak, the public hearing was then closed.. Preceding discussion by the Council, Councilman Wise wished to go on record with the fact that the City Attorney had advised him to abstain from voting on this matter. PROPOSED ACTION - to uphold the decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustment granting a zone variance to permit the construction of two four -unit apartment houses, one on each lot at 144-148 Lyndon Street, in lieu of maximum allowable of two units per 1-ct. Motion by Councilman Valentine - Second by Mayor Thelen. FURTHER DISCUSSION - Councilman Bigo expressed the opinion that because Councilman Valdes had been involved in the meeting with neighboring property owners, his vote was needed in determining this matter, and after discussion with the City Attorney regarding the votes needed to uphold or override the decision of the Bo rd of Zoning Adjustment, Mayor Thelen withdrew his motion with consent of ih,., second. Mr. James Huntsman, 201 North Sepulveda Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, representing Mr. Harold Hargrave, present owner of the subject property, stated that he did not believe the presence of the full. Council would guarantee the three votes necessary to uphold the action of the Board of Zoning Adjust- ment. .-1- Minutes 7/21/7P Zone Variance Appeal - 144-148 Lyndon Street (Continued) ACTION - to reopen the public hearing regarding zone variance granted by Board of Zoning Adjustment for property located at 144-148 Lyndon Street and continue to the meeting of August 4, 1970, for consideration by full Council. Motion by Councilman Valentine -- Second by Councilman Bigo. So ordered. ADJUSTMENT - RESOLUTIOI; .Z.A. i54 -•2O, ADOPTED JUNAme, 11;70, ZONA: VARIANCE TO HAROLIWARGRAVE IN CONNECTION WITWR0PERTY LOCATED AT 144-148 LYNDON STREET - Letter dated Jung 10, 1970, from Harvey A. Denison, 234 First Court. D!SCUSSIoN -- The public hearing was opened by mayor Thelon, and eui1ding Director Bud M. Trott outlined for the Council the public hearing held by the Board of Zoning Adjustment and their decision to approve and grant a variance to permit the rection of two four -unit apartment houses, one on each lot, in lieu of the maximum allowable of two units per lot. Mr. Kenneth Komick, 1007 Pacific Av ague, 1anhattan Beach, contractor for Mr. Hargrave, was present to peak on :.ehalf of the property ewer and replied to questions from the Council regarding the set -back and curb cuts that would result from the construction as planned. Councilmen Valdes and Wise suited that they had attended a meeting held by residents and property owners in this area in order to becombatter• acqus inted with their Objections to the granting of this variance, and it was their opinion that no one in the neighborhood objected to the construction of an apartment complex, but th=:t they felt that parking problem would result from the intended garage facilities. Councilman Wise then brought forth parking plan which he felt would olve the prdblem of curb cuts by providing inside parking and ingr se and egre .a on one driveway, and Mr. Komick expressed interest in studying this revised plan. It was suggested by Councilman Valdes that this hearing be continued to the next regular meeting of the Council so that Mr. Dick could study the proposed revision and perhaps reach a decision regarding its feasibility, and he and the other members of the Council, would also have an opportunity to examine it before attempting to come to a deci ° ion. ter. Komick pointed out that he had had the subject property tied up in escrow for some time, and that further delay might cause problems, but that he felt th.;:t' this new suggestion might be worth considering. Mt. James Huntsman, 201 North Sepulveda Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, real estate broker for Mr. Margrave, stated that this property had been in escrow originally set to close on May 26th, and that Mr. M. rgrave was understandably anxious to avoid having to wait much long and had hoped that 'this matter would be re= olved this eek. Speaking in favor of th apartment complex as proposed as a much-needed step toward th:. improvement of the southern portion of the city, but opposed to the parking problems they felt would result from the garaging and driveway as set forth on the original plans were Mr. Jerry McComb, 167 Lyndon Street, Mr. Warren Von Pertz, owner of property on Lyndon Street, Mr. Harvey Denison, 234 First Court, Mr. Robert Currie, 2519 Monterey Boulevard, and Mr. Seymour Gorsline, 43 Monterey Boulevard. rd. Mr. Huntsman asked the Mayor whether this natter might be resolved t the neat meeting on July 21, 1970 if continued to that meetinge and was informed that it would not be in order to px omiss a that action would be taken, but that every effort would be made to avoid no further delay than absolutely necessary in reaching a finr1 decision on this matter. a2- Minut s 7/7110 ACT/ to continue the public hearing of protest nd Appeal regarding decision of Board of Zoning Adjustment to grant variance on property located at 144-148 Lyndon Street to the next regular me ting of the City Council on July 21, 1970, for study of proposed revised parking facilities. Motion by Coillmasan Valentine - Second by Councilman -! '.Idesa. So ordered. 10 jRAG 197C t,;; i.y O rtsno1.1 O:.vic Center l oriosa B ch9 a1 .'to 902,4 Qa3.n1 l omens As as concerted property OWUOP isOtild like to take the necessary step to file protest and appeal the decision made by the Board of Zoning kd2ustment' on 8 June 1970 Thts is pertaining to the variance granted on the property Located at 144 acrd .148 Lyndon y Lot 9 and 109 Biook 42 to build 4 apartments on earth lot to separate buildings. Please advise. Harvey A. Denison 234 First Court Hermosa Beach; Calif. 9 254 lam: Harold Korgrova LOTt : 14-: and Lyndon TO 'U4 T: Applicant to erect tic k-uar6 Y apartoont houses, one an each lot, in lieu of maximum ai to able of two units per lot. RE5OLUT1 0.2.A, 4.S, 154-20 A iESO&uTic OF THE BOA ,r, OF zwinN ADJUSTKENTS OF THE CITY `• Wit SA BEACH 6RANTf1S A ZONE VARIATE WHICH w4ULa, PERMT THE ERECTION fW TWO4-UNIT A RT.' Miff HOUSEN. ONE ON EACH LOT, itd LIEU OF NAKINUM ALLOW= OF TWO UNITS PE LOT. SAID LOTS L T► f. AT 144 and 148 MOM: LOTS 9 and iv, DLOCI4 42. IST ADDITIDA TQ HERHOSA BEACH, CITY W NEI OSA BEACH, ChLid`tl 8A. NE BOARD IW USTNEl1TS OF TSE C 1T<° OF RERNOSA DEAR DOES BIRSOLtI AS 1r,t.: LINS: WHEREAS. ehtlr;. was filed with this Board, under tbs provisions of Ordinance, N.S. 154, an application for a4 variance by Horold * rgrava Kean proporty owned by applicant eyed located at 144 aid 146 Lyet dan. WHEREAS. The Sclera of Zoning Adjustments of the City of torte itch did al dub:c 8, 197u, conduct a public Ftearl Iaj to consider this appli. st6 n tO permit the erection of two. 4-unl t apartment houses, oro a ?,t eh tote In lieu ofmaxi- mum allowable of two gaits per lot. WHEREAS. at sold public hearing there was presented written s - oral stimonr oo the property described as follows.: Lots 9 and 10, Block 42, let Addition, to Hermosa Beach, thea +y ch, California. POD. THEREFORE, OE FT RESOLVED that in view of the ttndfag at said hearing), the Board of Zoning Adjustsmots does hereby gra it this varix .chs for the fCoilt aor,g reaso 1. Than granting of thi , variance will .cot, be materially dotrimantat to the public welfare or i,;jurious to the property or imprevemetts la dbe inmedidte area i,' which the property is located because the erection of two 4 -unit apartments, Instead of thea .sl los. d Ana milts, would create a lesser de.tsi ty factor, los ovscrco: di:,g, and traffic probiems. 2. That such varix +cap is necessary for the preservation and odoveolt of a substaotfal property right. 3. The granting of such vas,rla ice will not adversely affect th comprehensive general pia. 4. Tha limiting of those tots to two wits per tot would be create. ,ry sacro un- necessary hardship and result in being iraco,asi stnt with gaoler/51 purer 0f Cho zoning crdit&nce. The foregoing Resolution was adoptees by the goard of Zoning Adjumtmenta et a regular meeting hold June B. 1970. by the followl.eg totos AIMS: C•..,.$sti, Williams Comm. esternn NOES: Chairmen Reeves CURTiF tCATI O 1 hereby certify tka►t the foregoinD FlesolJtion 6. .A. M.S. 154.20 wen ad Gad b the Board of Zoning Adjuss::,;:,.ts of the City of Hermosa ,-ech at a ro ulnar meting held on this 8th day of Jure, 1970 Ricard tlil i law, Secretary Hormen Reeves, Chaireon PAGE 2 m N4RUYES 07 B.Z.A. ETU J 8, 1970 Chairmen Reaves, mot6n0 hearing at E::07 p.m. Chairmen Reeves Invited Or. Kenneth Remick, prospective buyer ead builder on the lot In question, to come forward and speck as Re. Margreves representative. ice . Umiak stated t tt xs var r is n is requested On order .: i ld a 4.,4.x:., it sato cant houses she each list. Oa said that r present seeing codest ::::to could be t rea ted es one parcel and a 92.un i t singlet! apartment house built. its s.: id be would pr for, beer, to build the two :gate buildings, Wiling tett there wtataid b4 e MOM precti :al umgeo particularly In regards to riling, as well as having s finfS esthetic v,1 uea t 14r. Koraick 'S,,,;,; now arriveC-ro-cpened thle public Chairman fives asked if anyone would 11ko to speak for tbs.:-fr ice. rts . Warren Von Portes', 6649.5th Street, Hermosa Vis*, �,,'s� s Hung! 036 ' u t8an Court. Manhattan r as . spoke in favor. May felt >4,t meg u It ;;.: ,: ts. that a aro building or two buildings. would be a derided asset tbe Provo Appearing burnt t.; : variance ware: Herm A. 8O(' 234 tea CeOrte G r ne. 43 Runway, Bich liulffInger,123 3ls t Stmt. rl ,r fe, 045 Lyndon, all of tlermase teach. S. Re. Dennis said that If everyone on the street built that cony units, %vie would hp no pi acht t® part:. &lr. Corsline and P. Eales said thy wo,ald prefer dm 9-valt single bra6eding bow cause there quid be a S' setback r ••a ►her than td 3' setback. fro ralflager said tWs areas had been discuss in the Planning C is sl i and he • could like to set up n wetting for to 01.A. ss rs ed the Planning Casteisaion members to discuss It tither. • Chairmen Roeves said the situation In the erg his bsen developing for several gears and the planning Com/seen had lin discussing It when I .. was ea that Wird last year. wanted t know vAlf tho a not CW44 n<'> with p macro .d:recconmnd aeon before. A motion ept8 ,+ .'; by Cam.6dI I l Q e secanOed by Che variance as requested. Notion cowled fIt ins veto: AYES: C. Williams. COMO. ,: , termana RO/S: Cha i rman Reeves. Amotion was%%fs,she 'Com. . -.d'al utL rq+� H.S. * 154.22C on p «res;.; r ty l oca ted asst I Nation rried by the f:,10 AWS; Wiiti Ewa: Chairmen E. to grant WI I I 1 s a sommtW by C , . ; . tarfavo, to ; Y ,:. ; t ggtp.,,urens mriance to Kr. R2 sem oil meted owl + vote: worm Heating adjourned t 9102 RI. ,4rd WI :.tams, Sacr>.ttiory �:,s`sa�.sta esta�, Baas rf� TO: i :rar+ and samers the Board of Zoning 4djussssnants, FROK: Building 01r'ecter SUZ,4ECT: Pppr lcEatten fair a variance by Harold Oargsrave prop rty located at 144 and 148 t,yeadns: Lot 9 ;,nd 90. Bloch 42 1st Addition to NereasA Beach. City of Beach. Califf. Appileant would erect 4-unit,epertment Isms. one e2 %sa,k 1 t, in lieu of maximum ai l le of boo units pee lot, et would be my recommendation that favorable consi =;rattan be give this request for the tel reasons: Oa , 200 19+9, the Zoning Orddaaera was wed. Sold asandmemt would emend Sectiml 606 which governs G '3 property by deleting the fol l ewe i ng: "If a legit contains less tie gore thousand square foot. or less than a forty foot width, the lot cannot be used for ,.+yo -than two Mining t e ,r; y` 606 valoped units". .., deletion of the above per raph ff r allows all 63-3 poraarty regardless of.the width. tO intmulti-family. prowl'therBnlur;, lot ar<,: per .;..,:;1lisg Is not loss than 600 equare feet, except as provided mar Section eata eAtch requires 2400 square fest for mere than as 50-,; to fealty residence. in the RP Zone. you are permitted t csrtaOn typos ©q p= .: asps ion l services end bee hese. Therefore, 1 feta that the Zone Should net be restricted more then th R-3 nems. Total area of both lots is 5,634, which if developed s ::Y. parcel under speer present zoning r .=_elation would allow n1 units. Meds old be 626 square foot ler dwelling unit. with a density factor of 69.57 ;h ,;. P acre. Sy davel Ong only 4 units an each it, t o squere.foetage parr dwelling unit Heid be 7u4 square feet with a density factor of 68.8. It appears to the writer. based on the above f indi .y.x thou 2 Pt apartments would be more desirabOe and cause' l sir overgrow ,Ong and traffic problems. Also 1. Thor _ are exceptional and € xtr ordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the pr'operty. 2. That such variance Os necessary for the pr,.ssrveti and enloymnat C* : >,, , property owner. 3. t the gam: ;>tif Wildi variance will tart Ely ., ftrims:nue to public welfare or injurious to Ohs party or improvements In such via ley and :s ,s On c>ahl v :. pyre § Oso it:mated. ds. That the gr.,; :tisg ee such variancewill mot adversely affect comprehensive gsazarei pima. � �, f esi l y od / No ..,. ret SAT: seta 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 , 16 17 'various streets by their commonly known names and does describe 18 the property upon which or in front of which the nuisance exist:a, 19 by giving lot and block number according to the official map of 201 said properties and as more particularly hereinabove set forth. 21 22' passage of this resolution, shall cause notices to be consp1cuous2, 23 posted on cr in front of the property on or in front of which tne 24 nuisance exists in the manner and form described in Section 39564, 25 39565, 39566 and 39567. 26 27 declares the hearing of objections set forth shall be and is 28 hereby set for Tuesday, August 4, 1970, at 730 p.m, in the 29 Council Chamber of the City Hdll of the City of He mosa Beach, 30 california. • • • RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 2976 A RESOLUTIO OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE EXISTENCE OF CERTAIN NUISANCES IN SAID CITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE ABATEMENT THEREOF. (GoVERNMENT cC;DE SECTION 39560 ET SEQ.) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City. of Hermosa Beach does hereby declare as public nuisances, -and provides for the abatement. thereof, the following property Tenth Street 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach, NE 38 ft. of SW 76 ft. Ex. of St.. of lot 5, Blk 78. Seventh Street Redondo Billa, Lot 66 and NE 10 ft. of Lot 67, Bik 139 Eighth Street Tract 2002, NE 30 ft of SW 50 ft. of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 Bard Street Tract 2002, lot 5, Bik 5 Loma Drive Tract 1686, Lot 9, Blk H Loma Dive Tract 1686, Lot 4, BIk H SECTION 2. The reference herein contained refers to the • SECTION 3. That the Superintendent of Streets, upon SECTION 4. That the City Council hereby orders and 31 32 - 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 • • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1970., ATTEST: .4....WARMIS.Pa•AW•nlVei APPROVED AS to/ eRglibENT of the City Council, and MAS of the City of fitermosa Beach, Californi orw.tAcdorJa• CITY CLERK TO FORM: _CITY Al I 2 3 4 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 1 13 14 15 16 17 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) I, Mary A. Edgerton, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution NO. N. S. 2976 WAS duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, at a regular meeting of said City Council, held pt the rogulr meeting place thereof on the 2Ist day of July, 1970, by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen Big°, Valentine, Wise, Mayor Thelen. Noes iTOne Absent: Councilman Valdes. DATED: July 2le 1970. (SEAL) MARY A. RTON Cify CNN and Ex O7ficio Clerkof the City councTL City of Hemosa Beach, California By: —repuity City Clri - ml.kt-wo • the r.....J-Arellit 14 Ott Altos" Botch Hermosa Swath, California The nsmesp prssent addresses (residence and businass) of all personA interested in s id biltinass or ir the sranti, OR r4. 1 APPLICATIMIN FCR PERMIT S Bermozalav David D. Connors ' CO21PO place :es. dres E& 12 Pie? Avenue . iress eanor C4.Connore 1.002 P$1, Place tor es 1%phono umebom permit, eras oh 376-1461 Bermes y 4So ions 374-9203 Hermosa Fiss0 3764461 IrsesMaapr44 t7 • ReSo nom e & 12 Pjcsr Awonun Hermosa Hezeh 574-9203 The location of the propov.ed business es lirhmentp planet, or thing for tatt.01(Airictrendt..,is requested: kliress 1,1. Ft. -.12 Pler:Alienus HermeA Beadh9 Calif. . The- Raid PremisesAs David ne h Weamvr C. Connors %chose addrees.is 1002•11th Place Rermsa Beach 00iforvia Present.. use of such locatien • Cocktails • - he ,exact nature of the bu3ineSs.proposad to be carried -Aleno Entertainment undort is num ef Mister CIS eherge ofAho Ordaises.or titainste tione t sA.x4' ee of the:msplipant iwtho matter to pormaiortaitegidt nd pt el4erience in sueh . Pat's 150n Pier ;venue, Redondo Peachs.. California 7 1 s 41, fit •ipt leh the reted business: --"*"----e-71117:41-7271G11717s Storw--:.Y • -2208 Artesia Blvdp Redondo 52 -Pier Avenue, Re??O� Peacb Wife la • • ••,137i9VM41,2741.tWAVagP . • - Ot Ifft.`" gla.4110 .ii.:nsi7ramoisseztamamwooar,imalte....arigMAirtr... Ne permit issuitd/tOap0-fioant':or osip public atutheritrhselmer140404,,fMgC pc,r.pialy,re to:60014a to the ropiroasilts of 4iTY , . _ lawst 44068 -egeelt:0"°11"$1 421.1a..14224., The appliGant awd his ossociAtes h •not been eenvieted inviolqnaMvre turpitOd,p. Tile following persons are referred to for informlOon re.sOnalbiliWand rerutatton of the mdersigned end asited tianie 46101.41DIS.01111V Stele Addresa 2208 PI:vd, R. L, 5204 Torrance Rivd., Torr. Mar 4^,attan 9eash ef.epp. atom to the chgremter, Oszwatien Li or Store Oar Par OL,Tler Rea/ter erplictnt .ni-ll persona to bc dr 1? 4101 indirmatly Interested in 140$1 Oval complet0 ,detWed Tersonsa identifieation data forme mu tho permit is grantel i/ &crew tcp PAY ProoTtlY the neeesPalrY i cense . protided tv'oprlitable ordinancess, and to comply with al/ the lam* state and federal, appertaining to the condpat of said business and to all th ordtnanOmeD roiOst togillation of tl-m Qv of HormoRa Beach. Application feet $50.00 recelived.., July 14, 1970 TO: City Manager FROM: City Planner SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Discussion: The Advisory Committee met at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers with Jim Collis, Planning Commission Secretary, presiding. The attached agenda was discussed, The City's projected Revenue - corrected by Mr. Philips of Edison Co. to be "money set aside by Edison for undergrounding Edison facilities Within the corporate limits of Hermosa Beach" -- was shown to be $93,000 at the start of calendar year 1971. Edison and General Telephone representatives indicated emphatically that their corporations were opposed to using any of the "8209" funds for participation in assessment districts, or "seed money" for larger projects which would include assessments and bonds. They wished it made clear that there was no intention to give money to the City, or to allow the City to contract for work with these funds. The money is Edison, the job will be Edison engineered and contracted. 'Edison will accept cash only for work outside or in addition to the "8209" money. A discussion was held regarding present difficulties .in neighboring cities with assessment districts for underground wiring. It was decided that where a street improvement project was in process it would be possible to save money in undergrounding_utilities. Three tentative projects were outlined: Pacific Coast Highway from south Boundary to Pier Avenue; Pier Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway to Manhattan Avenue; and south Hermosa Avenue, Maps are to be prepared by the City showing the outlines of these three projects, The affected Utility Compan!es will estimate the cost of undergrounding in each of the projects. The Committee will meet again August 11, 1970 2:00.p.m, to consider these costs • and recommend a first project to the City Council. • TRASH AND LITTER TESTING PROGRAM - FINAL RE,PORT INTRODUCTION During mid -summer 1969 the Impl:'oVement Commission began looking for solutions to the many trash. and Iitter problems in the city. For ease of dealing with the n iftitcl problem, three sepaTate and distinct categmles were created, each. dealing with a portion of the oveT-a.il pob18170. The first and most broad based of these categories is the residential portion. .After a good deal of study, research, and analysis, it was determined that th.e problems were, a combination of inadequate, deteriorated and lidless containeFs along with.noisy collection and lack of proper storage space. After extensive product review the Refuse Committee, consisting of Betty Ryan and various staff me,m.bers, proposed the use of a one-way collection system. Consequently, a multifa,::eted test, examining all the characteristics of the new system, was initiated. The test was divided, into three components; ie Environmental/Comparison test, Efficiency test, and Public Acceptance test., A numb of one-way containers are on the market, each with advantages and disadvantages - in order to ds-',-,SrMine the best one suited to our needs we in- cluded one block sectiOns„ eac;n, using different p'oducts in theover-an test. Primarily we were looking or maximum improvement in the environmental conditions (wind blown litter„ unsightly containers, etc.) The products teste,(. were Mobil Plastic Bags (can liners), SinclaiK-KoppeJ (,'can. liners), St. Regis (paper bag suspended from rack)„ and, Sinclair-Kopper2 ((plastic bag suspended from a rack). At the conclusion of a staggered eight-week testing period, paKt- iciF,,ants were requsistec. to complete a questionnaire. • / •c,t: A portion of the Fr S. Lilts are as follows: rI fie,,rio ze, g.tzt +14, • ,...„,- 1 v ..,-.. 1 1 - Sr e S { , 1 ".. „41.0- : - no ,--'" ..,,,,,„..., ,„, yes iiii,P _.,:___ ,,,,-170 ,,,," . I! ..,ir' , , r! Ob 'LI . agl ____J. ---- .-,..`" - - **Sincla ir-Koppeic no , ,,,' , 80 ,„,---"" 4,4 L„,-." 30 „.„," 38 "'I-67 „,- SS - ,..,- ..- , ..,' • .„," ci - • _,,--."' St. Regis no 1,,,-/- 4,5 ,'„,...,-" 33 ,,,,50 ),,,,,,".33 yes I 53 --/-- :40 '.50 72 SincIa ir- Kopne,T2 no i,,,'" 42," 60 , .*". SO ........,--' 28 ,,,,' *returned qjstioi aires not big enough sample to be accurate, probably due to Van- sient nature of the test area (200 and 300 block of Rayv Lew) **Sinulair-Kopped. figures from large sector test. (see above for block response') • • The staff evaluation of the differeY.7.t systems concuTred with the survey results; even though no objective critel.ia had been established for the staff analysis. It is unfmtunate that the questionnaire return, from the PiciYVieW area was so poor; we wee unable to compare the effectiveness of the two can liner systems. It is clear; howeve., that this approach is the most desireable - not only in. terms of effectiveness an acceptance, but price. The plastic can li.n.eTs are the most economical of all the one, --way containeTs. Public acceptanCE' Of the various systems was difficult toz.z.ssess.showever the survey results gas/ a strong indication of positive fe;rqings„ In addition, the plastic bag sales at the 'Fire Department have reveaod that a substantial number of citizens are us hg the products (to date„ 400 voSI.shave been sold)„ it is cimently estimated that 10% of the sd ts are voluntarily using the plastic bags i4)urch sed either from ow.. Fire Departma:t or other retail outlet.) A sector test was des ..grted, to analyze the impTovernent in collection efficiency. After many discussions with s SV eTal bag KR anugacture.' , the Sinclair -Kopper company of Long Beach., agreed to donate 1,000 roils of bags ,ione for each res- idence in the beach area of Monday's pick-up route)„ ''Atth. cooperation from the Eermosa Beach ExploerS anri. the CO:UrBbian Squires, the weFe delivered,. .4ter eight weeks of testing, each participant was sent. a..questionnaire„ A portion of the survey •i. -:?sults are listed above; and a compete tabulation is attached as an addendum. Generally speaking, the test partictpar.ts liked the bags „ and bellevec they impvovefl the litter situation. Almost 50% indicated they wo'lld continie using bags on. a voluntary extra -cost basis „ A good pro-- - pc o L smnairi.ing Iikvi the but VIR:)Uke. not ct,”A; Usirg them Ur less thebags were provided foe cu sc,me adjustment vr, rilade to the refuse. cha'sgeki2ed by the oity„, In terms otThC. envloamenta LCt I: a th*?, ;7.e; u Its s.i:Y..;a1; th.ems,I.Nres, The refuse cont-aclx.,:w esthna tee that under a manditmyNay system „ appox- tmai,ely o;,le how; per day cou1,1be saved. When. Ili On -cjil crion activthes ane.. discounter.. this is equivalent to appre„)ximately 25% increase hr collection efficiency,. Conclusion of primaN,y th3p.rx,..ance, are the ay,:.»,e.aching resU;ts and applications of such a testing progYarn„—All participants in the tests e,citiZenS, staff observers ,, anif the refuse contra C'X'4*.. acy.;eed the one-way system was a sign,rioant improvement. collection methodology. Of Alathe prod acts tested!. the plastic can liners appeared to provide the best mix of effectiveness,. efficiency and cos;. The increased effectiveness is ve•of substantial, yet it is not enough to offset the cost of providing the nov,,, disposal, containers - thus. to a citizen or tt:: the city - it WO U. Id mean a net inc ase in. it must howeve„ that the incyeased costs PF,i y for a. better env iX•1>,11,1".flen t reduced '.rindbiown no cans left • Tice current bags being sal through the Fir DepaEtment are on a consionment basis (no initial purchase of the bags and payment only for those sold). Un- fortunately, our supplier will not continue this arrangement. If we are to con- tinue bag sales - we must make an initia purchase and then resell to the public. This could be done on a reimbursable basis but would require a one time outlay of $1,550 for 1,000 rolls. It is the Litter Committee's recommendation to engage in such a program° Combined with the bag sale program, an effort to advertise and publicize the advantages must be undertaken. The new refuse contracter, ARCO has in- dicated they will be doing just that an.yway. Out part could involve "pep -talk" messages on the refuse bin, notices in the, Newsletter, etc. The aim would be to ix/crease the voluntary use of the bags. The second major portion of the over-all test is the, commercial litter experiment. The Litter Committee believed th.ese litter probles•,ss are a 0. r.r.xs.sfa:sztasilor physical problems: the commercial areas are not conducive to cleanlineSs. The intent was to replace the 50 gallon (.3ums with attractive eye -appealing containers. Initially, 0111-5' thought was to use fiber glass containers, however, at Mayor Thelenus suggestion we tested the material for flamibEity and found the containers actually supported flame. Consequently, the containers did not fulfill our needs. Further :product gesearch was conducted and seven concrete containers were purchased at $70.000 each. Initially, they were placed along lower Pier Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive after the sidewalks had been steam -cleaned. The reaction from the merchants „ patrons,, and visitors seemed (mite favorabie. The con- tainers did infaqts: beautify the aroa, both in terms of litter control and asethetic considerations „ Eight weeks Rater, the containeys v,Tere transfered to thn 2nd Street and Hezmosa AVertUk3 area. The reaction to the containess he was signilicantly different than at the previous t(3.. The area aesthetics did not impsove, nor did the litter situation° The area generates just mcae refuse and windblown litter than con- tainers can control „ It would appear that the only .3e1ution, to the problem would. be a clean-up service charge to the. area merchants with special clean-up on a regular basis by city crews© Generally, It is our feeling that the commercial test should continue as pro- grammed with test sites on Pacific Coast Highway and other downtown loc- ations. Once these are completed further analysis and review can be made. • -4- lu The third portion of the overall test was the Beach/Pier/ Strand area, The problem here was overflowing barrels and private use of public containers. Our strategy was to replace the large drums with small pole mounted con- tainer; thus forcing residents to use their containers and allow Beach and Strand users the availibility of the new containers.: The results of the ex- periment were mixed Initially° two containers were stolen, either by frustrated Strand residents or professional vandals, At the remaining locations, inventive residents thwarted our approach by purchasing our plastic bags at the Fire Department and placing their personnel trash in a filled sack adjacent to the pole mounted containers', Both these practices ceased to be a problem after the first few weeks. The containers presented a problem for collection 'also, mainly because we under -assessed the volume of refuse from the actual beach users. Now that the residents seem to accept these new containers, we plan to continue the experiment except to increase the number of large barrels on the beach itself in order to draw off the litter generated by the beach users. A report on these results will follow. COMPENDIUM All in all, the litter testing program was a success. It did not (by a long shot) solve our litter problenisl, however °.t did reveal Important insight into the nature of the problems. We believe the results have brought us signifi- cantly closer to solutions, Simlair Koppers COOF HERMOSP. BEACH • 'can liners TRASH AND LITTER PROGRAM QUESTIONNAIRE (Bayview). 1. VI h.at is the first number of your street address --(so we know which product you tested)? 300 Block 2. How many people ale in your family? 2 3. Do you live in. a : 1.0 single jduplex LJ apt. 4. Is this the fimt4ime you have used plastic bags for refuse? t R "yes T ilo - How did they compare to others you have used? r Not as wellOTho same 0 Better ,-- 5. Approximately, how many bags did you use per week? 1-5 average 6. Did you have problesys lining,your cans with the bags? .r ---L „---, Yes i L__3 ino if yes, please explain 7. Did you have any difficulty in filling the bags? LP_ ey s , no if yes, please explain-. 8. Diel you have a problem removing the bag from the can? yes 3 I no 9. -----e-W,: the -twist closures an adequate method of sealing the bag? —atr,Vss. ti 2 ;yes Ld no 10. :ffia-you have prOblems transporting the bags to your collection spot? 7- p a 'jYes [Fin° If yes, please explain ''''' '%.wie.---", ,--1 - - -. 11. Did you experience bag failures due to animals? r,7 1 - 1 y e s s.n......., rSjno If yes approximately how many? 12. Did you h,ave'pag failures in nonnal, usage? yes ' rilno if yes apwoximately how many? 13. you noti,c4r6 reduction in noise on collection day with bags? s.: 0 Yes 3-.- no ......... 14. Did you notice- a reduction insr,atterecl litter with the bags? rrives 15. Efiii you notice5 decrease in odors as compaEed with the can system? _1,,, FrDyes ri In° 16. rfc general, did'iou find the plastic liner system desireable? il 2 1Yes Fin° If yes„ would you continue to use them if you could pig -Chase a 25''Ount roll for $2 „ 25 of a 50 -count roll for $3.95? rrlyes 12 no ._j • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TRASH AND LITTER PROGRAM QUESTIONNAIRE • Sinclair Koppers Plastic Bag on a Rack 1. How many people. in your family? smage 3.5 2. Do You live in a: rgsingle 71 duplex L -------i apartment 3. Is this the first time you used plastic bags for refuse? Cji yes [no 3A How well did they compare to others you have used? C21 Not as well rri The same L irBetter 3B How well did this system compere to bags and can method? 3 Not as well T-T:the same Better 4. Approximately, how many bags did you use per week? ay. 3 5. Did you have probleos pulling the izteos on the racks? yes 11 no If yes, please explain 6. Did you have difficulty filling the bags? yes no If yes, please explain "lar...0211100.0.1.•••••••11.**•11.0•10•••••......M.....**. ¢...**11.01•1,16010.• OnAk..11...almarattertilElele.1. 7. Did you have problems removing the bags from the rack? yes no If yes, please explain •omualmoatbatiwamps giro wm1.4*.mtnr 8. Were the twist closures an adequate method of closing the bag? te rt." yes ,[ no 9. Did you have problems transporting the bags to your collection spot? 2Iyes li3 no If yes , please explain ....scsamo*--..ms...occa........mtooto.merearoatan..0.—. mvaAaaluier.-+Pe.nragexervalam.-4. acea....roar W. Did you experience failures due to animals? yes rq no If yes, approximately how many? _L- 11. Did you have failures in normal usage? 4 yes 161 no If yes, approximately how many? 12. Di▪ d you notice a reduction innoise on collection day with bags? yes ro no 13. Did you n tice a reduction in scattered litter with the bags? Myes no 14. Did you notice a decrease in odors as compared with the can system? Frljyes 1fl no 15. ngeneral, did you find the plastic bag sstem desirable? ryl yes T:Lq no 16. Would you purchase: • Arackfor$iO,95UiyeS az no A 25 -count roll of bags for $2.25 RI yes TfJ no A 50 -count roll of bags for $3.95 2(yes 1.91n0 • Ilkobil can liner CITY OP HERMOSA BEACH (Bayview) TRASH AND LITTER PROGRAM QUESTIONNAIRE 1. What is the first number of your street address? (so we know which produce you tested? 200 Block 2. How many people are your family? avera..;e 3.5 3. Do you live in a IT 2 single D::] duplex OD apt. 4. Is this first time you have used plastic bags for refuse? !ryes RI no - How did they compare to others you have used? Not as well F:1The same En Better. 5. Approximately, how many bags did you use per week? 6. Did you have problesms lining your cans with the bags? yes 13 no If yes, please explain 7. Did you have any difficulty in filling the bags? Eyes LU, no If yes please explain 8. Did you have a problem removing the bag from the can? yes no 9. Were the tw- ist closures an adequate method of sealing the bag? 5 yes no 10. id you here problem ii transporting the bags to your collection spot? yes El no If yes, please explain 11. Did you wqerience bag failures due to animals? lyes El n.o If yes e approximately. how many? 12. Mid you have bag failures in normal usage? eyes .01 no If yes, approximately how many? 13. 15i a you notice a reduction in noise on collection day with bags ? L711yes Wino 14. • Did you notice a reduction in scattered litter with the bags? r4-] yes'..--ino 15. b I d you notice a decrease in odors as compaved with the can system? 31yes tnno 16. ii general, -aid lyi'.:;: find the plastic liner system desirable? 13 1 yes 121 no If yes would you continue to ise them if you could purchase a 25 -count roll for $2.25 or a 50-cout roll for $3.95? yes 'b no • CITY OF HERMOSA. BEACH TRASH AND LITTER PROGRAM QUESTIONNAIRE Sint Regis PF-2.p.er on F. 1. How many people are in your family? average, 2.7 , —.... 2 Do you live in a.:, Ai single filluplex r lapt. . • 3. Is this the first time you have used a paper sack: for refuse? Lic yes [Tina - How did they compare to others you have used? Not as well The sane _ Better. 4. Approximately, how many sacks did '.., you use per week? In*WW•air.r.W.M.X.WW*Murir....i9a7,1”,.:es,, 5. Did you have problems putting the sacks on the racks? Eyes .'no If yes, please explain Au10•11111.•••••..M.11 ..socn•••••••••(.01•0.••••1* mneRrN*0.•••*•.•••••••• 6. Did you have any difficulty in filling the sacks? iyes -17 no If yes „ please explain *PA =MM.. awavatn• . kW* **at v•rwrira. uvorr•,3 cm& ar..n..••••....rm....arl**. .1.••••••••••••r••••••••",. 7. Did you have a problem removing the sack from the rack? 4res 1E no 8. Was crimping the sack an adequate method of closing it? ryes /Trio ---o •J:.C..-.., 9. Did you have problems transporting the sacks to your col3eation spot? yes Fr no If yes please explain_ 10.4••••••••••••••••••••it eq••••••••••MaN ••••113011.0.000.1.010.0...0e114•0•111.0•111i ImOV•Mr1WWW....... •,..,MF,J,...'...•••••••WO.T.,......./..111.,..s•OrnI•Plz•innos•2 10. Did you experience failures due to animals? ' yes Eli no -If yes approximately how many? ..—_ 11. ,Dd you have failures in normal usage? liyes "Ono If yes, approximately how amany? , 12. Did you notice a reduction in noise on collection day, with _sacks? yes 12 n.o 13. Did you notice a reduction in scattered litter with the sacks? Tnyes ,-31 no 14. Did you net.ice a decrease in odors as compared with the can system? .., 5 Ye S 53no 15. In general ,did you find the paper sack system desireable ? yes 3_no If yes „ would you continue to use them if you could? LC yes ,1 no xfLta,S€....q,..l.:.�r,c.. OR t"•. Tie '4 ib.` ! i_ ,moi i 1 k .0 D PL ST ICe I1..GS k 0 AauleUiiL Ii D Y� Ow!P.`:ft a ' 3 C'I'a :RS YOU Ek Ti US1':D? ' DID YOU I3:iE P R' arge _ > 'al 1 i 4 4: \fi r',u' i," \1 °e. .; s'1 e 4a"°1:"?1.s1 open F hag r fell i.rxte can ra a Irs t, �. actn ^enie' i. large ror carrying when 4. ) into cans .a air pocket:,. aall items- i t :;o vanient b;oo i €,r ge ? DID YOU 'EA.VE ROBLE; R.t4 OWING ' x! AG FROM NE 0141,1 a e7io7e can 15e wata;..- e Fa, :; r g cct,rnefa 1 ti4k gi o t. a _00 TRAtY 7 1 Ui AND i. �. [� 'ad �i`:-R PA GRAM `Yogi x 1� i t 2,4 ad •vau. .c ..+.a L kk1?Y 1)1P YOU HAVE ?R�)BLEJU TItAlTSlO.RT1NG `I' .t1AGS '20 YO iR Ct1'ICiN SPO .10k 217 Problems? 8 tcc beai;y to carry 2 ` Passage/alley narrow 12 ,weight causes bag to tear 2 inconvenient to store full 2 bulky 1 couldn't remove 1 hag split DID YOU EXPERIENCE BAG .FAILURES DUE : TO ANIMALS? NO 200 (82%) YES' 42 HOW` many 10 = 1 fa i:lu e` 7 2 9Y 2 4 4 4 7iai re mo •� of ruli (1.. ) .1 . 1 rC,/o -f'aiiure if put o t as oo x as !Titled BUT it are if ke? t ur=ti trast9. co1le c,1i day. Der J8e`4 16'`a i.. DIP ` i` tU HAVE: B.A0 -,A. UIZ:E I3 NOHL USAGE? NO 1`4 Pr blen= 4 7 6 4 .SES 41' 1 a;'al Ire PC i F6i 1 7 8 2 10 4 40': the r 11. (124-) e oer y time 7's.ar7. h leGtr were i.r. ate' i. u easily 1 -P^agi le l ALL :age gave the trouble. RASH tal l) Iia I,a a OU t 12. lUIU YOU Vvi' C ; QED r `1•£ 56I") Cset NO 105 k: 0.0 DAY_WITS 2n of boa e during pickup time rx ke still make noie 13. DID , YOU 'NOTICE A REDUCTION IN SCATTERED LITTER WITH T: YES! 171 Reasons! 7 - non—ecopera animal 4 improper (70%) Nes - 7 ng neighbrrboo age A BAGS USE? 14, DID YOU NOTICE A DECR iAS ; IN °boas AS SOMPARED WITH THE YES i49 NO 59 ® IN GENERAL, DID YOU PIN e ifIR— - , �a "� 1.l' L NE. PE .DEM YES 1 AN, YST? A -t f b. WOULD YOU CONTINUE TO i:SE THEM I Y U COULD PURCHASE TEEM ,YES.A It.7,' NO 15 27 48 alifi°oto i s; emta` with r 2i l if rnandat nry rate nme rr �.. n.iae P :5r' F':. bar'9 nei0b rho d i zzaIenr. 4 ai:l,x there d ue �. s er erect e treated a „ a • • TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Hermosa Beach Improvement Commission SUBJECT: Outdoor Arts and Crafts exhibit and sale Gentlemen: As last year's experience with an art show was so successful, the Improvement Commission would again like to sponsor a similar event - on Sunday, October 4, 1970 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the plaza in front of the Pier. Gen- erally the activity will mirror last year's event. Serious South Bay artists will be invited by the Commission to provide enter- tainment for Hermosa Beach citizens as well as providing themselves with an opportunity to display and sell their works. Again it is hoped the city will provide central cashiering and the use of the city's resale license. Proceeds from the sales will go to the artists whild normal sales taxes will be sub - vented to the city. If approved, the Commission would further request a waiver of license fees for all participating artists and craftsman. The Commission believes the event will not only provide "a good time for all" but also promote the enhanced image of our community. Thank you for your continued cooperation. • • July 7 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Mary A. Edgerton, City Clerk SUBJECT: Pending Commission Vacancies Civil Service Commission Robert E. Bowman - Term expires July l5 1970 COPY Dear Sirs In regard to your dilemma Kt 2809 Manhattan Avnu m may I tree be remov d. As a neighbor or from this heap of rubbish, let worst. sense. July 23, 1970 involving the `beer can tree' strongly recommend that the who lives across th street e e }ty it is an eyesore in the If Ben Valentine • think it is °something° then he is just showing an irr-eponsib]. - attitude toward improving the image of Hermosa Beach. Surely, our city does not want beer cans as a tourist ,;, ttre ction'' . Any attraction it brings is the wrong kind. W hope, as homeowners who el cted the Councilmen, that you will act responsibly and remove the tree by August the first as stated in the payer. Sincerely, /s/ Mr. and Mrs. Carl Klud j ian 204 -- 29th Street July 22, 1970 Dear Sirs T am writing to you to strongly complain about the refuse at 2908 P rat tan Ave. As neighbors, we have put up with thio heap of rubbish in their front yard well as their almost nightly beer busts. 7(e cannot think of anything worse than keeping this mess as a work of art as you will encourage this type of irresponsible behavior. 1f nothing eise n think of what will happen to the tree in a few months. Certainly the plant will die, the cans will rust d the "art" will become a real refu. a dump. Please continue with the plan to remove it by August 1, Thank yam. Notes No S ignat ur . . Envelope postmarked I 1 d , Califorrnira COPY 1134 - 19th Street Hermosa Beach California 90254 July 24, 1970 Dear City Council; I would like to commend your .action in the matter of thit "flip -top beer can gree" loc:.,ted at 2908 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach. In regards to the Fire Departments action labeling the `tree" as rubbish; * (Definition of rubbish; waste, r fuse, broken or rejected matter as of building materials; hence anything worthless; trash; ) this particular creation by Mr. Dick Goad does not fall under this, definition. Each aluminum can is worth (W one-half a cent apiece. Therefore the tree is not worthless but does have monetary value. The °°tree' we realise will not be as everlasting or monumental a> the Watts Towero or our city's Windmill; but it reflects the present days changing creativity as much as new music and now fashions in the world today. As evidence by the many on -lookers it has brought to that section of the city it is appreciated and recognised as a cre hive endeavor by an individual citizen in the city of Hermosa Be .ch. A safety award might be forthcoming tto Mr. Dick Goad for finding way of making the yucca tree harmless tobrush against or bump into without possible injury. Please add my nam.a. to the "save the tree". lie t of citizens.. Sincerely, /s/ Marie T. Bunker t Funk and Wagnall's New Standard Dictionary of the English Language. 516 dor on 8treot F:#rnh ttan 1 , 0266 July 28, 1970 Somoza aoh Cennoi1 Berme,. Boaoh9 msilfcnU Gentle 2:, ie i® in re. x rile to the tree plotted an the front , :F of She ;T.; i Breese Jsa' 22 Y plea amtly startled,. 7t Fra eortal lqueg int root and dot ma,, ttroetiv o i do not believe it ea the •he®djng• ef 61 01 ash° t about one ista of od of Y th or of met anythl 1 chis }:: lttmyhe alteveni he egreel it moo IF t w ham, . liv 1 this efta eine@ Met, have teem pre •'t rty Og owner she 18619 ane ors middle std °establishment° people. If that le ore -donee t - thi.M letter. 2 ' rx.!k yea for listening. 4-v". TO i INTI -OFFICE l E2M i l Wes McDaniel BRFR -EE 2908 Manhattan Ave. SUBJECT. DATE• 7-22-70 FROM C. Fowler On July 17th this department received a complaint from Mrs. Mount - 217 -29th St. 372-0103 regarding beer cans on bushes and strung on neighbors fence. Mrs. Mount indicated the neighbors were ready to sign a petition regarding this situation and regarding the ge- neral disruption of the neighborhood with regard to the constant partying that takes place at the above address. Mrs. Mount WAS informed by this department that. our authority . in this situation was in a gray area, however, we would investi- gate and do whatever we could. Frank Holland was assigned to handle and he requested guidance concerning our exact position in the matter.' I suggested he talk to them and try to have them remove the cans on their am, however, if that didn't work or if they questioned his authority, cite them section 14-20 of the Municipal Code. /mit Following Frank's investigation, he informed me he had them section 14-20 and they agreed to remove the cans by August lsst. In checking with the Police Department Frank Holland found they had received numberous calls regarding the same location. It would appear that further inves gation is warranted due to the the en- tire situation. ., c ti;,1;1, 4 / et1/ 6c0. �, iL xi.://ittlid art- y C 044 ✓ �, /,, use^ wizez,4, ( 11z.�. e , t; :. e �, vt cep -tint r- cit:avz , 41, 11 C/91,touf d cn't2 FC'� 004,C. IN NON-AGENDA ITEMS FROM AUDIENCE: man T7ree - Mr. Richard Goad and Mr. Willis Scott, 2908 Manhattan Avenue, informed the Council that they had been instructed by the Fire. Department to remove refuse from private property, and pointed out that what had been termed refuse consisted of over one thousand beverage cams that they had turned into a moden, art tree lit at night with blue and green lights, and that they had heard no complaints from their neighbors. City Manager McDaniel recommended that the Council refer this matter to him, and the Council agreed that Messrs. Goad nd Scott should have an opportunity to discuss this matter with the City .staff. OCEAN FRONT Y HEATED POOL FAMILY RATES e FREE TV STAY BY THE SEA THE SEA SPRITE APARTMENT MOTEL, Mr 260 1970 The City Commit City of Hermosa Beach Civie Center Harness a+e t Bach, CA 90254 Gout/moms notified shorty aft r mortmg ham rave Lomita the hazardous traffic situation at the Intersection otion e Pier Avenue end. Valloy Dwive.Artaore Ar Wish m z, iota of tu fommgany stops. I a oa®ider this vary dangerous ter t ' tenwicts and boar,kgoor are a $Wm =mart et Wai®tKe tla 4>-a at sash inters ®nem ®tea oSayahmsomt®gett the 4 oack® Many driverm mmt little short f a eample 4 e step e,- Pier Aro. aad miss awat.n& a ear ally driT- ins 1 to the int ra sett en. During t.w&; oeheet Sa ar one ft: ds s . keel children att aired i a. Pier Ave. Soh.. r atjs'�r'tr no4•rb8 soh els '}._:? mat areas this usnallY busy tntarseetiona At €dight as Za mule aiinmras amd bar hoppers enjoying Hem aa 0 mita lite b t probab.a lyQQ°�' a s - ems' �`ar teals t h f is firs #$ ;1��5tomtl • areas the .4Items mention, 5:...i:3. . :Z Fla ®ti's"ar7 ovary day. C workat th imp ed erase this intersection w P' ne one la on Pier Ale, "4 °"'" ;iia. MORO is a linea of ears waiting tstop and savories VolLey.Ardmoro Drives. ago the City CamSIL pr sod ask a trarfl semt pa r= ,4 Y b ink it would►e ma . �a - ;, � et the City cad' Hermosa t ch t Kan I improvements on emr a ttea to a and in >, .ve emr tr a: ''cfl aa4 anfetY Nue within our elty. „aItm, T 1 lammed ora zuttlue tiale letter some t'4 r.: a @bt sever' both ved to do &co T dr (ReteI saw 1311 onstat aeold3 <;t et A, elle and Fier Are= xt that s one motivated ma be writing. El lag to hoar even City Zeta ameno f Atte 3e B70,0f� ,10.Q16 STRAND a HERMOSA BEACH, CA 9 RNA 90254• „Cf/; 21 ) 3,f15-6033 4, A' • July 23,19?00 "AO Manhattan ��A oachrCOal ddifm Hermosa City Council, Hermosa. » ash, Calif e pear Sire: The City of Hermosa peach is in a position.to perhape gain,fOr permanent display in the City of Hermosa lihrarY,ret orginal Lodhamn P intin:3o Three of these paintings have so far been placed, one in the City of Torrancerono in the Brand Museum m in 41endale and Oft in the ?re€edilo in San Francisco. If the City Council will vote to formally rqu .eta Lochman oi*i,ginal from tars. Anton Mare of 4221 Crest DrivopEanhattan I (ajtre, the chances appear 3ood to obtain one fror i the dwindling oo1l oticano . The paintings in San Fricisc ),Torrance and Glend;.le were painted around 1919 and have a minimum insurance xlus of ten thouoand dollar ae STATE OF CAL1RO NIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL 1218 0 STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIF A 958111 July 24, 1970 Mr. Wesley C. McDaniel City Maneg r City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. McDaniel: iel: RONALD Rr'.AOAni Governor Daniel L. Held L.'cra:b1 neat 530 Pacific Coast Hy. Hermosa Beach File 48975 The above application has been withdrwn.Your protest is therefore moot and further action will not be t=ken thereon. If, in the future, notice of a new application is posted et the same premises andyou wish to prot -et issuance of the license, it will again be necessary for you to file a verified protest during the thirty°der:;period following the subsequent date of the posting of the notice to en- gage in the s -:le of ;alcoholic beverages. Very truly yours, Hearing u • j Legal Unit „h* By (H rs . )' Dorothy Pierson Supervisor P:pw cc Mr. Kermit Q. Greene • • PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE RECOMMENDED EY PLANNING COMMISSION Slra i177— DISCUSSION - Mayor Thelen declared the public hearing open, and invited anyone present who wished to be heard to come forward. Mr. Arvol Aabel, 4M - 35th Street, Manhattan Beach, applicant for the zone change, stated that he had circulated his application among residents of the area and had received one hundred per cent support, and Mrs. Evelyn Earle, real estate broker, 1255 Prospect Avenue, property owner in the subject area, stated that she was in favor of this land use reclassification. As no one else wished to be heard, the hearing was then closed, and the City Clerk read aloud the title of the proposed ordinance. ACTION - to waive further reading. Motion by Mayor Thelen - Second by Councilman Valentine. Carried. Ayes Councilmen Bigo, Valentine, Wise, Mayor Thelen. Noes: None Absent: Councilman Valdes. FURTHER ACTION - to introduce Ordinance No, N. S. 387, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOPNIA, RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE BETWEEN FOURTEENTH STREET AND PIER AVENUE, FOR ZONING PURPOSES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 154, AS AMENDED, FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND GENERAL AND HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL TO "R-1" AND "C-3" WITH MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL POTENTIAL, AND AMENDING ZONING MAP OF ARTICLE 3, SECTION 302 OF SAID ZONING ORDINANCE, AS PETITIONED ,zY ARVOL AABEL, ET qa." Motion by Mayor Thelen - Second by Councilman Valem:ine. So ordered. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 211 221 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 • ORDI>' IISCZ NO. N .8. 387 AM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RE- CLASSIFYING CERTAIN REAL rROPERTY IN SAID CITY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE BETWEEN FOURTEENTH STREET AND PIER AVENUE, FOR, ZONING PURPOSES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 154, AS AMENDED, FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND GENERAL AND HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL TO "R-1°° AND "C-^3" WITH MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL POTENTIAL, AND AMENDING ZONING MAP OF ARTICLE 3, SECTION 302 OF SAID ZONING ORDINANCE, AS PETITIONED BY ARVOL• AABEL, ET AL. THU CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES .ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That after public hw:.ar ing by the Planning Commission as prescribed by Zoning Ordin. nce No. N. S. 154, . s amended, and after public hearing by the City Council as therein provided, . the following .r „al property situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Loa Angeles, State. of California, that is: Lots 26 27, 28 and 29, Hermosa, Heights Tract, be and th., :w ame ata hereby reciasssififrom wR-1" to "R-1411-3)". Single -Family Residential Lith .Multiple -F ..y Residential Potential; and th:;.t Lots 31, 32, 35, Heights Tract, be and the ame are hereby reclassified from "C-3" to "C -3(R-3)", j General and Highway Commercial with. Multiple -Family Residential Potential, and the Zoning Map of Article 3, Section 302 of said Ordinance No. N. S. 154 be, and the same is, amended as herein 36, 39 nd 40, Hermosa set forth, pursuant to the provisions therefor in said zoning ordinance set forth, as recommended by Planning Commission Resolution P.C. 154-774, adopted June 15, 1970. SECTION' 2. That maid City Council has caused to be prepared a small area map of the area or district affected by the zone change hereinabove ordered to be Made, which said small area map is hereunto attached, designated as Exhibit "A", and is hereby referred to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Said small area map is hereby adopted as, and shall be an amendment to the extent of the area shown thereon and 1 affected th reby of 'Zoning gap of the City of Hermosa Beach", 2 . referred to in, and which is adopted by, the provisions of 3 Section 302 of Article 3 of said. Ordinance No. N. S. 154: of said 4 0ity. 5 SECTION 3. That this ordinance shall. take effect thirty 6 days after the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of 7 fifteen days from the passage thereof shell be published at least 8 once in the Hermosa Beach Reviews a'weekly new paper of general 9 circulation, published and circus ted in th City of Hermosa Beach. 10 11 12' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ATTEST a PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1970. PRESIDENT of the City Oounc , ,, and MAYOR of the City of Homo a Beach, California APPROVED D AS TO FORM: 1 CHM. BY.... ---.:DATE earitt. Z,as T.I014 'V ,: Ogg hattft/Jan NO... ..=we: :: ..,.wrr. na..r..dar a spr..go...inev 4....wo...au.,.00mowoaar<.saa..pwr"..o..4s aww•. 4 ...... rwrr• { ORDINANCE NO. L w S. 367 EXHIBIT 94." PUBLIC ...HEARING - PROPOS EONE NGE -� RECOMMENDEDr.: PLANN commuprom RESOLUTION p. C e 154-774__ADOPTED aUNE 15 1970. DISCUSSION - After the public hearing was declared open, Mt. Joseph Gross, 551 - 3rd Street, expressed his oppositon to any land use classification but single-family residential in the subject area. No one else wished to speak, and the hearing was then closed, At the request of the Mayor the City Clerk then read aloud the title of the proposed ordinance. ACTION - to waive furta Yr reading. Motion by Mayor Thelen - Second by Councilman Valentine. Carried. Ayes: Councilmen Sigto, Valentine, Wise, Mayor Thelen. Noes: None Absent: Councilman, Valdes. FURTHER ACTION - to introduce Ordinance No. N. S. 388, entitled: "INN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF H ;;'OSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IV SAID CITY LOCATED ON .din^° :cm AVENUE, BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND FIRST PLACE, FOR ZONING PURPOSES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ZOHI %G ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 154, AS AMENDED, PROM " N F0 MANUFACTURING TO M(R-p3) ", : MANUFACTURING WITH MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL POTENTIAL, AND ENDING ZONING MAP OF ARTICLE 3, SECTION 302 OP SAID ORDINANCE, .AS :.> PETITIONED BY H. L. JOHNSON." Motion by Mayor Thelen - Second by Councilman Valentine. So ordered. 1 2 3 4 5 6 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 . 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 • • ORDINANCE N.: S 388 AN ORDINANCE OF. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RE- CLASSIFYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY LOCATED ON ARDMORE AVENUE, BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND FIRST PLACE, FOR ZONING PURPOSEa. PURsaJANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 154, AS AMENDED, FROM "M', MANUFACTURING, TO "M(R-3)", MANUFACTURING wIrH MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MTENTIAL, AND AMENDING ZONING MAP OF ARTICLE 3, SECTION 302 OF SAID CRDINANCE, AS PETITIONED BY H. L. JOHNSON. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That after public hearing by the Planning Commission as prescribed by Zoning Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended, and after public hearing before the City Council as therei provided, the following real property situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, that is that portion of Lots 41 and 42 of Block 78 easterly of Ardmore Avenue between .First Street and First Place be, and the same is hereby reclassified from, "M", Manufacturing, to •"M(R-3)4, Manufacturing with Multiple -Family Residential Potential, and the Zoning Map of Article 3 Section 302 of said Ordinance No. N. S. 154 be, and the same is amended as herein set forth, pursuant to the provisions therefor in said ganning ordinance set forth, as recommended by Planning Commission Resolution. P.C. 154-775, •adopted June 15, 1970. SECTION 2. That said City Council has caused to be prepared a small area map of the area or district affected by the zone change hereinabove ordered to:be made, which said small area map is hereunto attached, designated at Exhibit "A", and is hereby referred to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Said small area .map is hereby adopted as, and shall be an amendment to the extent of the area shown thereon and affected thereby of "Zoning Map of the City of Hermosa Beach, referred to in, and which i adopted by, the provisions of Section 302 of Article 3 of said Ordinance No, N. S. 154 of said City. SECTION 3. That tnis ordinance shall take effect thirty r• 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 :3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29. 301 31I 32 days after the date ofits adoption, nd prior to the excpiration of fifteen days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once in the Hermosa Beach :R.`:vriew, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in. the City of Hermosa Beach. PASS, APPROVED and KDOPTED this day of ,. 1970 PRESIDENT of .tn .City Council, and H YOR of the City of ;: Hermosa Beach, California Sae— _ . lR.H . «v.>...,«� S 9 iJEECT.0 'vVer. ,.SS kil e° . = i'tage--- SHEET NO.m««J CHM Edi DATI , ,m... Ara .l ..46. e..mf. `t.,t to zte ,„ JOE2 ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 36 EXHIBIT "A." 0,4pm, eadv SEWER CONNECTION PEES - New Construction, Remodeling and Additions - Study and report dated July 13, 1970 from Board of Appeals as requested by City • Council on June 3, 1970. DISCUSSION - At the request of Mayor The1en, Councilman Wise outlined for the benefit of those prei eut the purpose of this proposed ordinance, stating that the existing sewers in his City were constructed over forty ,years acro,• that inspections of this eyete a bad disclosed excessive deterior,..tion in certain areas throughout the rcysten, and that the increase in in the construction of multi -family residences throughout the City would soon cause the sewer system to reach a point where it could no longer adequately accommodate the ii cr;eased Mee of sewage. Minutes 7/21/70 Sewer. Connection Fees (Continued) Councilman Wise added that at the request of the City Council this City's Board of Appeals had appointed a committee of its members to consider this problem, and that after careful study of fees charged : by neighboring cities for connections to the city sewer system this committee had recommended that this City establish a charge to be collected for all additional connections to the sewer system in order to provide a fund. to be used only for the replacement of the existing sewer system or the construction of new suers where necessary -fix the public health and safety. In reply to questions from the Council, Building Director Bud Mb Trott stated that the method and rates of collection were based upon the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1967 Edition, and that it was consistent with fees charg-:ci by other cities. At the request of Councilman Valentine, Ma:. Trott stated that the Board of Appeals members who had served on the committee studying this matter were Mr. John B. Schmol1e, a general contractor, Mr. Chester Witt, a plumbing contractor, and himself -:s Secretary to the Bo n: rd, and that. the City Manager had also participated. The City Clergy than read _ aloud the title of the proposed ordinance. ACTION - to waive further re ding. Motion by Councilman Valentine - Second by. Mayor Thelen. Carried. Ayes: Councilmen: Bigo, Valentine, Wise, Mayor 2raelen. Noes: ' None Absent: Councilman Va1den . 'FURTHER ACTION - to introduce Ordinance No N. S. 389, entitled: ,off ORDINANCE OP TIE CITY. OF HERMOSP BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER.28 'SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE DI?SPOSAL" SOF T3. CITE' CODE BY ADD/NG �TI ER SECTIONS 28-7 THROUGH 28�-� 14, TO PROVIDE A SSR CONNECTION CHARGE _ )R, INSTALLATIONS CONNECTED 10 THE CISecond SRER : � . �xsn,;. Motion by Councilman Valentine 5o ordered. ORDINaNCE NO. N. S. 389 TN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,'AME CHAPTER 28, °SEWAGE AND INDUST.O2:AL WASTE DISPOSATJ OF THE EY ADDING THERETO SECTIONS 2e-7 THROUGH 28-140 TO PROVIDE CONMECTION CHARGE FOR INSTALLATIONS CONNECTED TO THE CITY SYSTEM, IWING CITY CODE A SEWER . HEREAS, the existing s-kwers in thit City were constructed over forty years ago and inspections of this system have disclosed excessive deterioration in c rtain areao throughout the system ; and WHEREAS, the increase in the construction of multi -family residences throughout the City is causing the sewer system rapidly to reach a point where it will, no longer adequately accommodate the increased flow of sewage; and WHEREAS, it has therefore become necessary to establish a means of providing for replacement of these sewers; to establish a charge to be collected from the proprties that propose to discharge into the public sewer system; and to establish a• fund in which these charges may be deposited, and from which monies Will be available for the replacement of the sanitary seer aysten NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IBUOTOWSW014. CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. That Chapter 28, "Sewage and Industrial Waste Disposal", be and is hereby amended by adding the following sections: "Section 28-7. Sewer Connection. Charg (A) It sh;=11 be unlawful for any pereen te mak, or cause to be Made, .an installation of any plumbing fixture and/or drain connected to the City sewer system without first Obtaining a sewer connection permit from the Building Director and paying the established fee as prescribed in this chapter for such contiectiOn.- ' (8) For the purpose of this settion, a sanitary .plUibing outlet on or to which a pluMbing fixture or appliance may be set or attached shall be construed to be a fixture. (C) Fee shall be collected prier to the issuance of any building, plumbing, electrical, or applicdble permits. "Section 28-8. Definitions. "Building Director° shall mean the Building Director of the City of Hermosa Beach, or his deputy, agent, or representative. "Flow unit ° shall m an the unit flow as et forth in Table 4-1 of the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1967 Edition. • • "Private" or "privato Iwo' as defineert in Chtlpter 1 of the Uniform Building Codcs, 1967 Edition, 0711,11i apply ttr,plumbing fixtures in rosieence and as'zxtmonts; to private ballttroo= in hotels and houpita3s; t rentzoom$ in COMDCKCilli eatinblishmenta containing reztricted uTe fixtures or ezroups of singl finturces and to stmilgr installations where the fixturois ere intended for the MG of a family or an individual. 'Wolin" or "public me" an darlinee4 in Chaptor I of the Uniform uiIing Codcl, 1967 Edition, eboll app_y t firturoG in cimmoroinl end industrial entablishmants, in re hr buildinsa, comfort stati.ons, schoolo, gymniimiumno rRilroma stat>lonE4* or plecem to which the public is i:witd or which am fretau,mnted by the public without specizd. porousion or special invitatiw, end othen installations, whether pay or V;t7ce, where fi:e.turez am installcd oo thtt 'their nc7e ie eimilarly unrestri,cted. lb1ic OCUTWv3 ohnll moan the malia sanitmry scwer, inclutling any sewer or owilitary pipaInc e portion th*rwf, and any •dower min, trunk, owis'er, or appurtenance in a public placo, or nemr eavammt whidh connccte diroct:-, or indiroctly mny lot or ips.,rt too: •win y pvrt of the Fanitary sevor &Fut= ox i:te City of MKM0Ela Beach. °Seotioa 749-9d. Enfoze.elLent. The Buildincl Director shall enforco and ttoinistor all p:fovivions of tbia chEipter,• "Section 28-10. Sever Cowna*tion Sewer connection ft -MS c'PzU, he bmca tpop t un•it lacreau set fovth in 'Pablo 4-1 of the Uniform BniMiaq Cofit,, 1967 Editiom. Mem t77ap sizes., are inorameld over the mirants,n,orwhelve the .tre is not licted in Tnblo 4-1, or greatsr vast& are evi6cnt, the diacharge rzte ohnlI be determined in accordmmn with T6be 4-2 of the Uniform 3vai1dinu Coete, 1967 Uditic,n, and n.11, Poem Ehall be •paid i accordance with the followialg liotingc • • MUK_XPSTAWITION5 (1) Residential Single-family. rezidence Multiple -Family unit (2) M2toF HomesarAjiospeTrpttg, Para Trailer trap connected to -ewer lino (one trap allowed per trailer pad site) (3) All• ether Private Use Public Use Fotelsand Mot14-11 Private Use Public Use (4) Lauadromatsi (Baaed on three units • . All other fixtue: Private Use PubRiCpge :11'lqactlapsta Xitchan sinks (with or L11 othal7 tre Private Ute Public Use vaer without grease Induptrial or Pizi.sufacturiu Private Use. Public Me • machine) trmps) Scher Blow Off -Direct or indireat connectixt to sewer Commercial or illnufactuyina Wash racks; cand traps; interceptorku-rec torz; swaps ecial wautes tz defined in Plmbins Cods, 1967 Edition, Chapter 1 "Dafinitiong' (9) (10) gervice (74-atforte 5.00 per flow unit 5.00 per flow unit 200.00 per connection 500j: flan unit 25.00 poi- flow unit 5.00 pur 25.00 p 50.00 per 5.00 per 25.00 per flow unit fiCif 'Unit flow unit flow unit flow unit • 500.00 plum 25.00 pnr flow unit 5-.00 psr 25,.00 por 5.00 par •25-00 Pmr flaw unit flow unit as unit flow unit 25.00 p flOw. unit Wnimurit 0.001400) 25.00 vax flow unit (Minimum $500.00) t0,00 25.00 por flow unit 25.,00 pcor•a= unit 25.00 al Oa) aup„A.J...altb_msliacul..stlisezE,..2fttpximiriztm; E0222242, , V.Tta, all other comavrcAL ipszattclordzsumpa glad; hay.074 olleattLe.,ed a.(1_:._&27,219 t Ghark h3 classified by the Emilding Impactor rim a private use or c. pUblic uee, •and tho rate per flvw un.tt that he as follows: Private Use Public Use ';.:1A • mit 5.00 pi flow unit 25.00 per flow unit • • Alteraticnt or additions to c xivti 7 stguctures, or the replaceMent of fi2t ;rel, shaii be ch :r ed as follo a 2 - (a) Resylential Single -Family residence Multiple -Family amily unit Ch) Motor Homes and House _Tz , ..er Patkv Trailer trap connected to sewer lino (eine trap limed per trailer per pad sit : j All other. fixtuwe a Private Use Pub is Use (c) Hotels andiotels Private Use Public Use v ding new fi.Etures sower co'nnec'tion fees (d) Laundromats (Based ed on three s its per P, chine) All other fixtures: Private Public (6) Restaurant Kitchen sinks (with or withcut greese traps) All other fixtures: Private Public Commercial and Ma ufact:vr41f Pr vats Use P blic Uee Bare R and Res :ku ants s< : �+' Service Stations 2 5.00 per flow unit .5.4 0 p<r flow unit. 0 o 0 per connection 5.00 por 25.00 per • Commercial oranufact:.urinc , �..rswMno✓ 11011w*¢+�s'..-1..P00.ymvMSYa*r..-wam�wvnew.+ vr2pM Wash racks v €s Fr -traps; i,.nterceptOrr sumps Special Mtstem as definesP ik ;; P]fu; 'b.i tuj e l%7 Edition, Chapter 1, f is iticmc3'. (j) McS,i. l f .CO s e t s, 'ia : ;� amrfR+'r.OY T �flW4flfcW' Miro s. jegat_Theraar Schools r L._ o_ther comcs99e1 or- factuda, �, {;�* py �r�, 'p p� asp t� gq`.�[j,sp �i..a-m..+..r�.e. ts..Fu f*uw•, i�FGs n of _ a"r Y.wML 51.4 M' 2.711. ' n.�w��.ssmw.w,m..fams+a�m.�.a•�.>W.maa r e.snuca.�w.,� 5°00 per 25.00 i or flow unit flow unit. flow un i t. flow unit 5 . T17!�a per flaw w Un..i. t 5.00 for flow unit 25.00 per flow unit 25.00 Ter f lcn unit. 5.00 par flow unit. 25.00 per flew unit 5.00 per 25.00 per 25.00 ler flow unit :lr unit fl!P; unit flow unit 25.00 Tia ' +. !' �.tvt T •aff�r .': 200-001400v �,• nyL�'t F w� ..0 P 1 bath' FiniLf that Shall be;claesified by •oho Building Director ars n private use or a ptblic use, and the rate per. Mow shell be as follows: Private Use Public Use 'Section 28-11. Depow,t of monied. The monies collected ,as provided i Sion 28-10 of this chapter shall be deposited with.. the City Treasure d.crodi4d to Sewer Maintenance and Construction Fund. ua:. 5.00 per flow uni, 25-.0O per flow xi - the • • uSet.,tic n 28-12. 1Jr,?o of Se `.?'.!:.Iit emm�cE',:+ and Construction }"e?!`e.nues .11:Gn��,� ciTSt1 in ' ', be k s€fa,:aintenance? andcoTtstruet on Fund, a2 provided ed in SC3Ction 254-11 .2. this nimptor, may he f. o+nd d only fon . urn sen 0.) For the repimecmont of C stinf new s Ci`i?'C;?.ti• nystem. (2) aft accompli?4;h any other a`a...Fi"sG:ilar pu 'K:Ose thnt the City Council may authorioo, (3) • `A'E: repay, `di ..toz 'without interest, funds advanced ed to the Sewer M .r. en anc't COnet:i'. CtiO . l: ht' from any OtiZ.wc 2 und. (.) To pay r fu d , tea authorized by Section n-13 of this r!� hapt',� . ''''Section 28-' 1.3a a AP^.,ra'is l:.'«:ki .. In the event that any peneon shall have °' the appAioe ta9;mer connection, Zee s•p ovidod. An Section 28-10 ..0 f . `i i d i3.F chap":xe.".' m and no i1." v 'alla .ion i ih , l have +'. :en an ttt`"i mcE:'F a and thG pe " »' i7 Y.c£i,Z: shall be entitled tled to }� ,..ofr ntR r ,, amount rqua one y u �r 6a r cent Gi'. .4. 1:'J fn Wed.& [S in, CSS;. f,��i1bS .,'�d.� �"ta�9,a.i�� to bl�w�Uu� rYi�MAC�N:uw ed �1;,,�.j�• ���".4it of the sewer omiioctibn fob: %;aiz' f 'EiFralid pwson, minue cr:1=17er cent of said charge; however, the mount retained Leied Ft i be' not lesa them ` -mi Do:E.la :•e, non 1i3o oh n One :e.r-, q q `. ¢ E)E :t 1 is 1011 23-14.- lf� 4;�R .R:$ ,iGi�i bf,, ruy.. The pi`, ov'i s :N,cAne o.L.: 'i ,nh t ch tlytE`;:.b shc applynto a lr ne51u kla' tag a t * jY� t s s F R w. a -,v, .- d-.,, i c".:",`.. w.t� �c.��:.:F.�i.u�➢I; �.4�.'�:i7�.'., �,. C�:�;i7.rtil ��i� �;i?.,.W ��a,`�a:'r ? �'_. �7•^���..��ii�u�'y :G':?+�;.k.,,�`'tG,:.n.a�iti� a�r:��b,�:�} a:a ��.t�'.i';.€;1w.n8 are s'1 yf ,� c r of q [a �::�.e:.'"i,, c.'ti�: G"�?.: a4s't ` �.�C;1lfr�E,:&r ��:4 ..: C�:�k�.&a�''t;t. i't :7,.1»:r'..'%" the e !..._E.;.?r:v �.�,'�"6: �4.°��.1`��; �..4�$:z.f,: LLpAN 2. That tb do rnCnco shall take wf.maa'm thirty %.,;y after ahvitm ;F,lIpti!, Imd that t.ru Rty CRaez, r t.si mo.etAf, P to 4 k p 4'r a ' 1!.;^; 1, adoption ,n e,, �, `w . L r r 6 X. �. spY : G' F, d`�'�3 of '�' f.a.+r } �^ i ��ai �� �° ai�.Z�.C�k"„,..:z.t�,�. ��1.,,.:t'.� .a:i� , �. sW_i �.�.,�.€...a<.. �,,,.8 `�:�;h� ;�:�:.. ;� r<.r,.:�..,�.,.,�:.... C�?5.E y� a t1 uOr,� c q �. T :qS N the 'ti �r c., �, dayr 1'�;' ,ft�?Iai:�,.7! �c.r.?A�;rt"� the name to �.�� .:�"��,�..�%i�.2°r �"�. ' 4�.��E� +� fi`.a� ? � w. � r.:...VS3 <., Beach Review, a weekly n"xFpzop".of s7enenvl circulated iFit - tt:PGa City of M3:'%G6Dva Beach, MUM), 3: ),p ^ PROXJ1 D and . laff,L 5 hi AWSSTr. rt'� 'fi T r VT0X t �.' TO , • • r' ". g c. �..�� ,:., AB 1:i :.�a�:1�a p m,��+,.�}� 'bI �h.,e:. El;. o b dai;'s�;.-'! �{w' 1�a fir£;1'r !:. t, �,'and�n,+e�...�,,...,. g. .C',: R of the City c4. !; '`rmo 'a i {s:;a p- Calkornia City CLenk City .t:ornoy DEMANDS AND WARRANTS - August 4, 1970 issued to:. Amount: 7727 Alpo Chemical ical Co. Q Parks Department Supplies„ 71.48 7728 The American Acade of Political & Social Science - SuFa:acrivt0 12.00 7729 Void 7730 Void 7733. Arnold's Hardware - Glcesse for Council TAW 4.43 7732 Associate Concrete - Supplies Recreation D p_: -t aernt 31050 7733 Athletic & Recreation Turf ms Assn. - Lacmbership Dues 5.00 7734 Bank of America a Y a "Q A? Trustees s Contract:, 2,-666.67 7735 Bank of America NT Sa Cutomer Billing Custorlar Billing 20000 7736 Blvd. Body Shop '' t:er'7 le & Repair Police Unit 50000 7737 Buslers Camera Shop rt, Monthly Billing 192026 7738 C lffornia W .teir w ric Co. rionth1y ilil:�.�.pP�e•,, 1,348 31 7739 Capt' Rents Inc 0 = Rental of Trencher Rea c;r e tion Department 71000 7740 Center Line Products Co. - Supplies Public Woks Department 26823 7741 Chimpion Chevrolet - Servicing ing of Truck Recr =Miep ;^tm.:.rt 20.17 7742 City of Mnhattan Beach <• H. B. Share of r:' i tterta nce Public ilorks 263069 7743 Coast Disposal w Contract 64246.24 4 7744 Coast Glass Co. = Repair front door Police Dcp:;t ent 1OOoa2 7 745 County of Fax Angels Agrc -, enLs 60 0 6 7746 Dearth Machinery Co. - Supplies Public tuorks Department 326.00 7747 Del Amo Dodge - Servicing of Truck Recreation Department 14.56 7748 Design & F viroanment Circulation & Prod. - Subscription 800 7749 Dunn Brothers Printing . City Not s etter 756.00 7750 E&gleson's of tort Angeles - Uniform Al:Lo nce Fire DepertL ent 9071 7751 Eddings Bros. Monthly Billing 262 075 7752 Mr7 A. Edgerton Expenses s 16047 7753 Clifford 110 Fowler tEN:p' :.GOE: 300000 7754 Funder Equipment Inc. Supplies Park Dc I _rt ent 105065 7755 General Telephone c00Yron hlT Billing 1,641.18 7756 General Telephone CO. - Street Directory Police Darartment 39000 7757 General Telephone CO. - Lessed Lines 36095 7758 Harley Davidson in Lon Angeles - Police Fbu. }-gent; 4:890.79 7759 Hermosa Beach Chamber of Osme °caa o Agroment 4166.00 7760 Hermosa a Beach Chemb r° of Ca raeb e - Firs: 4::rks Displty 1,000000 7761 Ho2ios Radiator Service - Service for Police Unit 39.73 7762 IBM - Platen City llagt. ger', typewriter 1925 7763 international Assn of Chiofs of Police - Membership Dues 25000 7764 International cit pan. ge mt, keen. - Fleur rship Du ;e: 67000 7765 Interr tiornl City le tnagGm nt i.str atio a Conference enc;e 550 50 7766 Lfanco Engine Services Inc. - Repair Water Puit.T Public Works Dept. 11071 7767 League of California ni Cities - iz, mhor ship DMOE 4O 03 776 Lion Uniform - Uniform t llo -. m: Fire De✓p 't rant 13013 7 769 Louis the Tailor - Uniform Alio- m:Ice Police Dapmr o. ent 914042 7770 R L Madden - Supplies Part: Depsrtmont 152022 7771 Mobil Oil Co. - Credit Cards 28.55 7772 Wa11a.ene CO Moore - ;sp: nce* 301 sP 7773 Motorola Communications Contract 169052 7774 Motor Cultivator Co. - Supplies Recreation Damrtment 18041 7775 Municipal Management Assis. t n ;u - Membership f=ee 5000 7776 Municipal Treasurers Assn. - Membership reship Di 30.00 7777 National institute of Municipal . Law Off= r- - Membership Thos 88000 7778 National Sanitary Suppe. r - Supplies Public l: or sa Ikpartment 22004 7779 hack O'Brien Screen Process Co.- Flags for Pier 164.58 7780 Richard Elson = Fees for Spring Semester 3.53062 7781 Pacific Flagstone G Supplies Public Works DF,pa tms rt €59032 7782 Palos Verdes Blueprint - konthlr Billing 1.51 7783 Ken Parr Leasing Inc. - Lease 909040 r1 Paget _____DEMANDS AND WARRANT August 4, 1970 Issued to: 7784 Jo Co Penney Co© Inc. form Allowance '.Fire Department 7785 Postmaster a Office Supplies Bldg. Department 7786 Red Star Industrial Service Roar o Services 7787 Regionel Planning Assn of So. Calif - Membership Dues 77 Sevin Diversified. P4ui.p Leasing w Lease 7789 Soil Moisture Equipment Corp. o Repzf ' _ Conversion Park Dept. 7790 South Bay Brake :mel - Service Police Units 7 791 South Behr Councilman's. Assn. . Aunual Dees 7792 South Bey Fire Eutin ui rY er Co. . - Supplies Public Works Department nt 7793 South Bay Publishing Co m Advertising 7794 Los Angeles County Treaeurer Membership Dues 7795 Soo California City Clercs Asn - Membership Dues 7796 Southern California Ediso.:'Co.; , Street Lights 7797 Southern CaliforniaEdison • Co.; - M{onthly Billing 7798 Southern California Gas Co:0I ontYaly Billing 7799 Morvin Jo Stafford .q Photo Services 7800 Sully Miller = Renta Berm Machinae Public kcrks Department 7801 Sun Badge Co. 0 Name Plates Police Bepa: tment 7802 United States Conference ; of Mayors m Conference Registration'Pee 7 ,; ,3 West Basin Water Assn.. -Membership Dues 7 •4 Wesfiern Badge & Trophy Co. :-. Supplies Recreation Department 7805 Western Highway y Prue - :. Signs Public Works Department 7806 Wray Printing Inco-..Pr.'ri y:gnses 7h` 7 Roger E. % Croix Refund 7 x8 California State College Police Training Officers Sen nsr 78 ', . Pauls Rentals m Monthly Dillies 7810 ARC Nursery - Supplies Pae Peterson Pork Department 7811. Steve Burgesso Sear .ccs . Rendered Recreation Department tment 7812 Bob Parker ® Services Rendered Recreation Department 7813 Jess Ler e m Petty Cash 7814 7815 7816 7817 Rex Trophies o Supplies Recreation . Department Rex Trophies e Supplies Recreation Department Ancorp Rational Service Inc.° Monthly Billing Armor Blevetor Co. Inc. Agreement Amount 17°.84 36945 479.75 . 1©0Q0 350.57 20°:76 105°90 10�QO l54?. 55 384,75 349,0€ 5000 $,267092 675:°O6 44P24 61045 7240 9#23 50.000 00000 '3949 14.33 40091. 32:0Q.Q 150,00 :21446 50•.00 196,00 34 80 56097 26025 144.46 •3425 e"70.6646 NON -AGENDA ITEMS - INFORMATION Available in the Office of the ClEy Clerk: aly of Downey - Resolution No. 2432 - Urging reconsideration by the Board of Supervisors of mid -year salary adjustments for personnel of the Sheriff's Department and County Fire Dapartment. MEETINGS AND SPECIAL EVENTS: VIVA VERDE - Slide Presentation re Greening Up Beach Area - Thursday, July 30 - Council Chamber - 8 p.m. PlagaLmCommission - Monday, August 3 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Ci Council - Tuesday, August 4 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. 8TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SURF FESTIVAL - Thursday, August 6 thru Sunday, August 8 League of California Cities - Thursday, August 6 - Los Angeles - 6:30 p.m. Board of Zonin Adjustment - Monday, August 10 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. qmleaurmgd Utilities Committee - Tuesday, August 11 - Council Chamber - 2 p.m. Youth Advisor Council - Tuesday, August 11 - City Hall Conference Room - 7:30 p.m. antklaaaLy_aanitation District - Wednesday, August 12 - Los Angeles - 2 p.m. Chamber of Commerce -Board of Directors - Wednesday, August 12 - ChaMber Office - 6 p.m. BoapLaamnla - Wednesday, August 12 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Imerovement Commission -- Thursday, August 13 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. "WEST SIDE STORY" - August 12-13-14-15 - Mira Costa Auditorium - 8 p.m. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT WALK - Saturday, August 15 - 10 a.m. Plannim_commission - Monday, August 17 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. City_Council - Tuesday, August 18 - Council Chadber - 7:30 p.m. Civil Service Commission •- Wednesday, August 19 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Beach Element Committee - Thursday, August 20 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Pacific Coast HigAfEyDameatleli: Meeting - Thursday, August 20 - 8 p.m. - Irasek-Polak Imports, 199 Pacific Coast Highway WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT - Saturday and Sunday, August 22 and 23 - North side of Pier. Board of Zoatallagjustment - Monday, August 24 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Park and Recreation Commission - Wednesday, August 26 - Council ChaMber 8 p.m. West Basin Water Association - Thursday, August 27 - Palos Verdes Country Climb 6:30 p.m. SUMMER RECREATION FESTIVAL NIGHT - Thursday, August 27