Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/15/70
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Tuesday, September 15, 1970 - 7:30 p.m. Council Chamber. - City Hall - Civic Center PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 1, 1970; Special Meeting of September 8, 1970. 1. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES: Improvement Commission - Dedication to City of Windmill Song, by composer, Wayne Murphy, 3396 West 84th Street, Inglewood. 2. NON -AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS - City Council. 3. COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC: Traffic Control Problems - First Street -- Letter dated September 2, 1970, from Mx. William R. Kramer, 1105 First Street. 4. OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS: a. Aircraft Noise Rulations - Letter dated August 27, 1970, from Randall L. Huriburt, Acoustical Engineer, Noise Abatement Division, City of Inglewood. b. Flood Control .. Letter dated August 31, 1970, from County Supervisor Frank G. Bonelli, urging support for Los Angeles County Proposition "A" on the November 3, 1970 ballot. 5. CLOSURE OF TENTH STREET - West of Pacific Coast Highway - Report from Robert E. Crawford, City Planner, dated September 11, 1970. a. Map of Area. b. Petition, dated August 26, 1970, bearing signatures of sixteen residents, c. Letter dated September 1, 1970, from Mr. Jack W. Rathbun, owner of property on northwest corner of Tenth Street and Pacific Coast Highway, opposing closure of Tenth Street. 6. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL: a. Poop Deck, Inc., 1332 Strand -- Premises to Premises Transfer - On Sale Beer -Eating Place -- Joseph H. Conley, Leonor L. Libby. b. Sehltffnpfelderst_22 Pier Avenue - Person -to -Person Transfer - On Sale General Public Premises - John S. Martinez, Charles E. Hazelwood, David Letchworth, Walter Davis - Hermosa Entertainment Corporation. c. Rumbleseat Tavern. 530 Pacific Coast Hichwa — On Sale Beer - Eating Place - Person -to -Person Transfer - Donald W. and Joanne Angel. Held over from meeting of September 1, 1970. er, City Council Agenda -2- September 15, 1970 7. HAZARDS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, VICINITY PIER AVENUE AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - Oral Report by Bud M. Trott, Director of Building and Safety. 8. PAYROLL SERVICES CONTRACT - Bank of America. a. Data Processing Study - Transmittal for Study. 9. AUDITING SERVICES, 1970-71 - Letter dated August 14, 1970, from Cotton & Francisco, Accountants and Auditors, 1611 South Pacific Coast Highway, Redondo Beach. a. Proposed Resolution of Appointment and Authorization, Fiscal Year 1970-71 - Cotton & Francisco. 100 PARKING LOT LEASE RENEWAL -, California Water Service Company Station 13, First Street east of Pacific Coast Highway. 11. ANIMAL CONTROL - Renewal of annual agreement, Southern California Humane Society, 5026 West Jefferson Boulevard, Los Angeles. 12. SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 69-1 - Report from City Manager. a. Proposed Resolution adopting Plans, Specifications and Map. b. Letter dated July 22, 1970, from G. A. Heidbreder, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer, County of Los Angeles Health Department, 220 North Broadway, Los Angeles. c. Proposed Resolution making findings on Health Officer's letter. d. Proposed Resolution approving proposed Resolution of Intention and requesting consent of City of Redondo Beach. 13. THROWING BALLS, ETC. ON BEACH - Proposed ordinance amending City Code. 14. ZONING MATTERS: a. Proposed resolution denying change in land use classification from single-family residential with commercial potential to multiple -family residential, covering property located at 731-737-739 Twenty -First Street - Council action September 1, 1970. b. Proposed resolution denying zone variance covering property located at 144 and 148 Lybdon Street. Action of September 1 1970. c. Proposed resolution granting zone variance covering property located at 1821 Pacific Coast Highway and 1820 Ardmore Avenue. Action of September 1, 1970. /5. MISCELLENEOUS REPORT - City Manager. 3, City Council Agenda -3- September 15, 1970 16. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - August, 1970. . 17. DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. ADJOURNMENT September 110 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Hermosa Beach Improvement Commission SUBJECT: Windmill Song Gentkmen: As you are aware, the windmill relocation has secured much publicity for the city, and as a result, Mr. Murphy contacted the Commission about dedicating his song to the city in honor of the Vetter Windmill. "Where Does the Windmill Go?" was written by Mr. Murphy in 1944, Mr. Murphy has written other hit songs such as "Those Gas Rationing Blues" in 1942. The Commission is preparing a vocal presentation for the meeting Tuesday. Respectfully submitted, RON BERGMAN Administrative Assistant RSB:mm tOT -J1 "+: MOi¢�.'.memolineD S7.5 1101/ CA yn tQIUq, n%ern/moO orb' ettt f,3 S"54.oC. !tie'riVV" r!-'1351 psi;) eeO fV °�..tre:eln no0 etLT rittliestri mtr 851 Mr. Wayne '?fie Pic," tb "r4 t Sae Wn Fite t of iieraikvaa City Hall on®a& Bench, CalifoAnta Dear Mr r Li and Councilmen; i. recognition a the citizens o ax � Wt Cg t1.k , 1 *Wh to 0a4.icate ay s r W ndra.i)1 Gel .°' to,the Gt y Y hereby itanotc' a my rights o titlo, M.nli.intpro.st aetd song to the City Of Ierre+dsa Beadle a isnanicipal cin ion in honor Of the V tt x q � ch a el Chet* Ods s tho Hayor Quintan Thelen City Office, City hall Hermosa Bch., ,Calif. I did want to.preset t °the att cl ° dealing on 1ta Ste at the Sept. 1st city council getting. As things d you had your hands full l so Daft that meeting at 9 o °cloth: 1 that yomPwill find the Una to 'um someone look in this p b em as 1 stwonay fel that aum ona is rain to get it at the earner cf Baraqy Court t & ltd St tjtotraffic problems loped i could soca that em the incidx46 ars too numerious not to. LLQ Emma* 1105 1 ; St. Etyma& fib,, CaUfe SURAVT way Xst St 07 it ? On August 26p 400 Po M. I contacted .the public Forks dept. to bring to their att .ntion a serious traf'f'ic ha ......ard which o' s on OUT tto ' ' he .on "almost" hates an collision at the corneas' of Sarney r First Stmt due to r car going the wrong way an Met Street and one going the.ocerect Keay on First Street. These cars do mistime soh e'tdher until %he ' met *met dua ts the . d -1 sg at Barney , 1, .aT' oa , man thgt we avarags .2 to 3 wrong vas? :care, dgy ae. that . the maw. Tear that tho . hi we bad ta0Y-monrmisses sod ons reported head Waw i re had b sn c rding to . sWdy ma acci€d is e ore way system than them are now but ho kms° t hengd .1i6"„lat'"also toll in .a frioally eel that tarp to much gather mame the problem. t an . just critici ' of a traffic problem. Cha ICI. There is aomettir g obviously wrong when we have o many wrong wey cars on street and its obvious that the Avera don't notice the alio 1 even rex the Ma ham pee morning going th?scea wrong way. This is the first ons Way street X, he warn with¢ a dog -k in it. Stara.are 3 approaches as I see it end they are (1) Kemp the preen ayatem and improve it.' (2) Junk the present system and return to. t w way trance (3) Wel Ott Street et Barney Coate with a fire gate which is self explemztory. REMEDY Oa improving First Street. Installover haagift6 niTrP fla pigm at art Street and Berney Court to stop east bound ,rima, ?tiv t treffio an; V the south hound BarneyCourt traffic, a chance signs t this iatirsact ion and as 1 umdess tam was to control the traffic . at t ) Rete th tso way y t€ ffic sal tail the S' sect at Barney Cho oo tido sit •pawriowgto of th6f:r ,tic. have a..:{3 a}:» tip oa.hov to ofd' t 16. ``e F, ra r 1105 "IPA. •5ti Esrmosa Bosch a Calif. • CITY OF InGLBWOOD cauFornia August 27, 1970 CWC CENTER 105 EAST QUEEN STREET 1INGLEWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90301 1ayor Al Valdes City Hall Hermosa &each, -California Dear Mayor Valdes: The Federal. Aviation Administration has recently asked for pv,hlic come mene on an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making regarding civil supersonic aircraft noise type certification standards. The City of Inglewood, already severely affected by aircraft noise, has carefully considered the proposed rule and has made recommendations to the FAA. A copy of these recommendations is enclosed. in summary, it is our opinion that 'with the advent of the SST, and in the absence of strict regulation of noise, the City of Inglewood, as well as all other cities which are located in close proximity to a large international airport, will be even more severely affected by the noise. We feel that because al! other facets of the SST program are sufficiently questionable, enviroameutal Lousiderations should be given much greater weight in basic decisions rding this aircrefc. As a city which may be faced with the problem of aircraftnoise if the noise standards for the SST are not sufficient, we urge you to endorse our recomendations to the FM. Sincerely, Randall L. Hurlburt Acoustical Engineer Noise Abatement Division RLH Enclosure ,3F F tr.. E OF JOHN E. VOGELSANG ti • DING OlRT)Fi DEPART ME NT OF BUILDING A NO S. AFE T TELEPHONES- 213/674 1111 E xT 24 LOS WGI.F. LES 213 "t, • CITY OF inc-7'..Levv000 cauFornla . August 20, 1970 CIVIC CENTER 105 EAST QUEEN STREET / INGLEWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90301 Federal Aviation Administration Office of the General Counsel Rules Docket GC -24 800 Independence Avenue S.W. Washington, D.C, 20590 Gentlemen: You have asked for public comment on an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making regarding civil supersonic aircraft noise type certification standards. (Docket.No. 10494; Notice 79-33). Contained herein are the recommendations of the City of Inglewood. You say that e. central question is the precise role that economic and technological factors should play in the type certification of supersonic aircraft. In our opinion, the method of financing and, the economic via- bility of the SST are sufficien't1y questionable, the benefits to be gained accrue to such a select few, and the overall program is so costly to every- one $ that environmental considerations should be given much greater weight in basic decisions regarding this aircraft. Furthermore, the SST will no doubt use many of today's airports. All these airports already have a severe aircraft noise problem. Massive land use changes will undoubtedly prove less feasible economically than quieting of the engine, plus being much more disruptive to the lives of people. In answer to your clasely related question of economic incentives, the City of Inglewood advocates raising passenger fares and freight rates NOW for the specific purpose of abating noise from present aircraft. We think people will pay higher fares; we think the CAB and/or Congress should allow or mandate higher fares for this purpose; and we think it is the responsibility of the airlines to reduce their existing pollution before venturing on a new program at the expense of the citizens of the country. We suggest taking care of today's problem first, then getting on with the SST -- not until the current problems are At least underway to solution. OFFICE OF DOUGLAS W. AYRES CITY ADMINISTRATOR T PHONES• 213 P-24-'7‘ fH. Federal Aviation. Administration Office of the General Counsel August 20, 1970 Page 2 Actually, to be realistic you should be requesting comments on three rules: aircraft certification, airport certification, and aircraft oper- ationThe aircraft noise problem cannot be separated from the lives of people living around airports and affected by actual aircraft operations. Our specific recommendations are based on criteria which we consider to be the maximum noise that is reasonable to a person living under or near the flight paths to major airports. These criteria are: 175 dBA - Maximum outdoor flyover noise consistent with reasonable sleeping conditions inside a non- / ac.ustically treated house or apartment. ' 85 dBA - Maximum outdoor flyover noise consistent with outdoor activities in single-family neighbor- hoods© Homes should be acoustically treated • if the sound level exceeds 75. dBA. . 90 dBAo- Maximum noise level consistent with the minimum outdoor activity associated with certain types of apartments© Apartments should be acoustically treated if the"sound level exceeds 75 dBA. RULE NO. 1: AIRCRAFT NOISE CERTIFICATION. In contra to the way Part 36 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is written, we prefer the dBA unit for measurement of aircraft noise. In- struments for making this kind of a noise measurement are much less ex- pensive than the equipment required for calculation of EPNdB, and there- by saves the taxpayer money •at all governmental /evels. Also, the correl,tion between subjective response and "A" weighted noise levels is almost as good as the correlation with EPNdB. However, we do recognize the slight advantage of EPNdB in reducing spectral irregu- larities. Therefore, we suggest that the certification rule be written in terms of both dBA and EPNdB. The EPNdB specification is perhaps more crucial to the certification process, but the dBA specification will allow simple and inexpensive enforcement of the operating rule. We must assume, of course, that enforcement is indeed intended. From discussOns with some of the designers of aircraft engines, we understand that the measurement locations specified •in the present Part 36 are too close to the airport. Much better noise reduction could be attained for the majority of people affected if the noise reduction techniques were optimized for locations slightly farther away from the airport. We agree with this concept and it is con- tained in our recommendations which follow. • Also, this will allow Federal Aviation Administration Office of the General Counsel August 20, 1970 Page 3 • noise levels to be established which are lower than those previously established for subsonic aircraft, and which are more consistent with reasonable levels for residential life. Our recorizaended noise limits are: 75 dBA (88 EPNdB) on approach at two nautical miles from the runway threshold. 75 dam. (88 EPNdB) on takeoff at four nautical miles from brake release. 75 dBA (88 EPNdB) at 0.5 nautical miles to the side. If vertical navigation equipment is avaailaabla and procestures-YiaVe been established and certified for its use on approach down to category I weather minimums, then these procedures should be allowed in lieu of a 3° glide slope. This will allow the manufacturer or airline more flexibility in meeting the levels recommended above. Power cutbacks on takeoff should be allowed provided that it is not reduced beyond that.power setting which would maintain level flight in the event of the failure of one engine, or which will maintain a 500 foot per minute rate of climb, whichever power setting is greater. RULE NO. -2: AIRPORT CERTIFICATION. All airports should be required to be certified with respect to noise compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. The airport operator and airlines should be required to cooperate in the soundproofing of residences within the 75 dBA contours for the new aircraft. This should be done in consultation with state and local governments. This type of rule will be additional , economic incentive for airlines to specify aircraft with low noise .levels. RULE NO. 3: AIRCRAFT OPERATION. This rule should state that aircraft'operating into and out of United States° airports must use that procedure which was used for noise certification, except where safety dictates otherwise or a different procedure will create less noise over reidential areas. Airport authorities may use the dM standard specified in Rule No. 1 to verify adherence to these procedures.. The City of Inglewood is perhaps uniquely qualified to make recommen- dati.ons•on these proposed rules. We have been faced with the aircraft noise problem for some time, and have undertaken a comprehensive and Federal Aviation Administration Office of the General Counsel August 20, 1970 Page 4 constructive approach to achieve a solution. The above recommendations were developed primarily by Mr, Randy Uurlburt, a professional acousti- cal engineer on the City staff, whom we have hired primarily for the purpose of helping us reduce noise pollution., Mr. Hurlburt is also en aeronautical engineer and en instrument rated pilot, and has given con- siderable thought to what is reasonable, safe, and proper. If you will adopt our recommendations in substantially unaltered form, I think you will find that the air transportation industry will no longer by faced with the tremendous problem it now has in expanding existing airports and locating new ones. You will also be doing a great service to those people who live in the vicinity of this country's airports. Sincerely„ Douglas W. Ayres City Administrator DWA:RUI: dm Enclosures BOAi-`. D OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 086 HALL OP ADMINISTRATION / LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA GOOla ODE -5611 / 44S-4OGS / C35-SSO6 Auguet 31, 1970 14E140E113 OF THE SOARS ERNEST E. REBS CHAIRMAN FRANK O.SON EIJ.1 KENNETH HAHN DORTON W. CHACE WARREN M. CORN FRANK G. BOP ELLI SUPCFNISOR, now 015TRICT aonorable M hyor and City Council St of Hexnosa Beach 1- Valley Drive cmoca Beach, California 90254 Dear Mayor and City Councils The Board of Supervisors, , with the concurrence of an over- whelmingly favorable vote of the. Los ,ung<les. County Division of the League of California Citi 's , has proposed that ' construction of 286 critical and urgently needed storm drains to protect residents in all parte of Lo 1ngeles County be financed by a bond issue to be pl .ced on tthe. November 3rd ballot. The measure, designated w s Pr ^ <<, si .on "A," '_,ill provide 252 million dollars in construction.c ,Otsa , (spread over an eight-year period, for essential regional and vital connecting drains that carry off ,-tomwet re from 'the 75 Cities plus unincorporated communities th r. , Catty. These proposed projects are;, k:, nece asry and important lin in a well designed and. coop erat .ve y engineered syst emo providing protection of life, property and the nvironatent, as well as improving sanitation, conserving water end s;tabilisinj " soil conditions, la your cap city as'chief executiVe of yo+ot 1ty r the . use of your nasi added to an outstanding list of other civic and governmental leaders of prominenc, would lend pr,str,ge to the Citizens' Committee to Prey s nt Flood Disaster supporting County Proposition A A resolution adopted by your council., similar to the one attached, would also add impetus and . serve to emphasize that these projects are a joint and cooperative action b - tween the City Engineering Depart;,:Y,r ,nt and the Flood Control Dieerict Honorable Mayor and City Council .August 31, 1970 Page 2 The advantages of mutual savings and c on b neflt are numerous and will be told in depth as the campaign progresses. However, the singularly important facet in launching this campaign is your consent to being an endorsee of Proposition A. Ste• look forward to an early.and fakvoa: + le rceply. Cordially, Prank G. Omani Supervisor, First Di trict is RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Los Angeles County Proposition A will appear on the General Election ballot November 3, 1970, seeking voters' approval of a $252 million bond issue for vital flood control purposes; and WHEREAS, Passage of Proposition A will authorize construction of some 286 critical or urgently needed storm drains within 75 cities and the unincorporated communities of Los Angeles County; and WHEREAS, These drains will protect the health and safety of all residents by relieving flooding or ponding conditions, ae well as improving sanitation, conserving valuable water and stabilizing ground cover, thus protecting and augmenting property values thwoughout the County; and WHER EAS, The City of _las been and will ruin a principal party to the.proposed construction program, having already submitted its requirements for drains needed within the city boundaries, and will take part in planning vital drains programmed for construction; and WHEREAS, The City of -has consistently sponsored and supported similar flood control program®, believing them to be in the best interest of this City, as well as of the nearly seven million residents of the County of Los Angeles: NOW, THER EEFOR E, BE IT RESOLVED, That the governing body of the City of does hereby endorse Los Angeles County Proposition A and does recommend that voter of this City also express their approval by voting "yes" on Proposition A on November 3, 1970; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, TIF in an effort to obtain broad public knowledge of this endorsement, that copies r3f this resolution be distributed to all newspapers circulating generally within the City of , as well as to the Los Angeles County Division, League of California Cities, and to the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, acti4 ae the governing body of the Los Angeles County Flood Control, District. Dated: Attested: • • September 110 1970 TO: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager FROM: Robert E. Crawford, City Planner SUBJECT: Closure of Tenth Street Request; A petition signed by a number of persons representing fourteen properties, shown on attached map, requesting closure of Tenth Street at the point indicated on said map, has been received., Additional Information: Letter from owner of property shown in red on above map protesting such closure. Sketch showing revision of entrance - exit proposed by staff as part of Mobil Oil request for new station; subject to further study prior to approval of building permit. Present Status: Traffic being counted on Tenth Street at this time. General Plan shows Tenth Street as part a a major thoroughfare serving the downtown area. If Tenth Street is closed, traffic now using it as a through street would have to seek other routes --probably Eleventh and/or NinthiStreet. Evaluation is continuing; appraisal of present traffic load will be made as soon as possible. Advantages of eliminating this leg of Pacific Coast Highway intersection are being checked with State highway department. Recommendation: No recommendation favoring closure can be made at this time. Redesign of the Pacific Coast Highway intersection is needed. Continue for report from Planning Commission; matter is on their September 21, 1970 agenda. IW • • ;“), 1970 request 10th Street oe CO8 off and aeoesk://esres routes fn.7 the Mobil Station be implemented as sYyriln on the at.tacha4 gxhihit. The reasons for this request as felloust 1) 'The'anoint Of traffic on thiS tet ha LacAret4N spessatially since the reorientation dr the traffic fl in a woatwarl d14-ef2.tioil from Tier ',feac. ThIP tref, net only autos but includ s:heelry commerei true„king wells ({Conseventlyt,wo lomad further request traffic eounter in the middle of t hill (ponsibXy bei' 650 and 69 16th 3treet) for verifloationv)) This situation creates Pul eXocaBiVe moise problem that ould b alevisted by your approval Of the attached plan. .2) The complexion of the neighborhood has onatgea aonelderably reoent yearF;. 1r thht;nare aro how 36 young ohilArqa living on this street tthich has an approximat 27$ grade that ereate6 excessive speed and great dangKr,to these gterJk We feel that the Es feta?' Cmtow createdlff 'these egadiftons (Iteep hillo inoreased trafflo flteWp *petted) demand8 Mitts ,Aetionf, We the undersigned, owners of property (or reprele-iitat4le,?,,opt4 owners1 located on 10111 street, Rerrnoa each, (bk't p„:.!!!;•'#chitai.,;'re Li Of iferri:•;:-;„/, Pacific Coast Highway) do hereby petitionthe city Beach, •Californi,a, to hear, review and approve the •f affecting our residential street by the incorporation of .a Station on the 900 block of PacAfic Coast Highwaye n .14,ddlt ton t !,• incr'essed trene fl.no causd•by the reoriretntatin'ef iler ?i.•,7;1 Name Name Nam Na .j.7% (0? '1§A 72ZA. hicioret,1,!- - 41;.. T t. S 1 Addreis: A (ire : ift• Name _violikvie a 3. I. 'iff72.7142 Ne Name Name Nam Name Name Name Name LT_ Acidress:GfAlt"2. --At-- Ado re s s: 7 , AO,J.resS: f. • - - A re s s: A t. s s t5a0 "fig 114 3,4:Aw 41177 rft — -0 1*Xe Address: (.. Name _A-11 Y•r- 711g1- (flu4'Addrebs: - ir +Ms • .1- • AzaxaMIlis, tdirgelMiNCVM. oi=10=4016, aacalareta=2ZO• ..8.0=0.311:61D CRAPROVI. .SWIlardS, .dided,-, °Are 7 Hermosa Beach City Council City Hall Hermosa Beachs California 90254 P.A. Box 1073 Parker, Arizona 85345 September is 1970 bjeeta 10th Street 6 Pacific Const Hwy. Intersection Gentle I am the owner of the property on the N.W. corner of the above streets, which includes 300 feet on the 10th Stre;t side and 145 feet on Pacific Coast Hwy. frontage, More specifically, Lot 1 of Tract €#6851, .and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 59 6, 6 7 of Tract 02230 The view I will expre ss in this letter are forwarded to your attention at the recommendation of your City Planner, Mr. Bob Crawford, whom I have recently talked with by 10 ::g distance telephone. Firstly, I have not signed apetition, which I understand has been pre- sented to your couartcil ;j to the effect that 10th Street be closed off from Pacific Coast Hwy. entirely forming a cul de sac. My primary interest is from a business development standpoint. I ars in touch rather continuously with some business firm in an effort to long-- t,rm le ase my land, which is just under 36,000 ssge feet in all. If it becomes obvious that an equitable lease is not forthcoming I may have to consider improving the land myself when financing has eased, as the taxes on such property demands high revenue, as you know. You may appreciate or not, that in the past I have turned down numerous small nterprises, which in my thinking would not upgrade this area of Hermosa, and which I felt were short-lived businesses. This intersection of Pacific Coast Hwytl9 Aviation Blvd., 10th Street, and Pier Avenue con- stitutes the `chub of entry" for H, rmossa Bauch, and certainly should be developed into an impressive and beautiful landmarkbut then perhaps I . am ahead of my time, but I don a t think : ;f v believe it is a 'matter vetting ng out towards a goal and not . co :sing to the extent that objective is stretched from 101mar tP•> S0 year. Es aab a of such com- promise. Now in regards to 10th Str> et itself. At this present time I a f in favor of some traffic traveling both in and out of 10th Ste from Pacific Coast Hwy:77%e present arrangement of,,u the barriers which precludes exiting out onto P, C m Hwye , has been a,.h : tdeeranci +e our casse e Depending upon future development of roporty, however, I would hope there might remain considerable fleU%bi1 ty to any plan implemented at this corder. At the same +time,, I do not see the feasibility of this street being developed ,: s a major Easest four lane artery, as your Master Plan .shows, unless of course, a great deal of widening and opening up of Ard re is alio in the plan. Any narrowing of my . property on lath St, to effect a four Lane artery would completely negate the possibility. of commercial de el.opment there, and so I am very opposed to the taking of any footage off of the north side of 10th Street for this: reasons • • A major complaint that I have personally with the City of Hermosa Beach, apart from any discussion relative to 10th Street, is the fact that many property owners are not infformed about mattrs coming up for discussion and review there at City Hall, Obviously I am speaking of those property owners who d© not Live there, a it is often only accidentally that we hear of it on your agenda that would in effect concern us. Your liut of non-resident property owners° addresses should be one of the most w11 used lists in your fila, in mailing out notices of the meetings scheduled for city plinthgD etc. It wala only throup the efforts of one of the resid4nts on 10th St, that 1 received any informati*n about this matter being taken up by the City Planning Commission and the City Council. Bringing this to a close I will add that it seems apparent to me that an increase in revenue to the city of Hermosa Beach is an all-important sub- ject that you keep in mind, and so it is your cooperation and understandinE; that I will be seeking from time to time in an effort towards developing my property in this area for commercial purposes. 1 am surN you will agree that the proptqr development wil/ be beneficial to all within that area, even to the resSJients on 10th Steeet. Sincerely yours, jack W. Rathbun JWILlacr 8:,te of Caltiornic Department of Alcoholic Agreerag 1215 0 zr.retot SPoromento, '::411iferni4 95814 a,:tg Control Se • 4-'6; len Re: Prztatoae to Promises Tremolo, Type 40 jozeph C;oniay 'ftop Deck' in7 806114 Paff,,cot., 5o. 24 of City Gauen11 of City of vvittiezt 1.104egi• :10 7 YNN e formal protect above-eitelt tranotew. Attieust 31, 1970, a Conditional Lio oot a publia lienrutg t000tioo kw a beer t to tilt: City Lag Goamieetoo cone kftl rotBuent Permit as rio utrod :Ander oar 2oiltyiej Ordinance a Led said request booed on MX .r.Lability th atmil pot raoismi the) applicant. Sim the ,porty c,.-Titiem oammot be iia,v for a bear Coodittexaell Use Permit, v120 'Lieo offtotally proteat th tow et,,wts lioeste 1441411% tan 0 We esergu.eat that ItEctmtu. Ca: t:"..,:..;rtevr Clfice Appitcant., City f,:,-iesek, my public WI:POI exiting of eta &acing n thiiS protest be maid to Ws city, Stmottirely,• RORT L C City Plenrte$ WPOkD :rj 1eZ of Police: City Attorney • • RESOLUTION P.C. 154-785 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF HERMOSA BEACH DENYING A REQUEST FOR CONDNIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLLSH A BEER BAR 'WITH PATIO AT 1332 STRAND. HEREAS, the City Manning Commission of Hermosa Beach, at .a public hearing held August 31, 1970 considered the request of Poop Deck., Inc. • for a conditional use permit to establish a beer bar with rear patio service on lots 5 and 6,, block 14, Hermosa Beach Tract, known as 1332 Strand:, and NA_ TiEREPS at said hearing the following matters were considered: 1. Distance from residential and non-commercial uses Residences are located within 30 feet of the proposed use. A newspaper publishing company is located within one hundred feet of the subject property. A public beach and beach parking lot are immediately adjacent to the prc5— posed use. 2.- Amount of existing or proposed, off-stxpet parking - None. property i in :,7ehicle Parking District Number One. No off-street parking is requised. Available parking is shared by beach uses o residences and the establishment. 3. Location of and distance to churches, schools, hospitals, public play grounds - Adjacent to public beach playgronnd. No schools in vicinity. Nearest church, snore than 600 feet from premises. 4 Hours of operation - Monday - Friday - 12:00 Noon to 12:00 Midnight. Saturday - 11:00 a0 rn. to 1:00 a. m. Sunday - 11:00 a, m. to 12:00 midnight. 5. Combination of uses - Serving. of beer and hot and cold food specialty items; self service patio use. • - • 6. Precautions taken by owner to assure .compatibility of the use with surrounding •areas - No additional precautions beyond petition with four signatures submitted in support. V' tiling to submit exterior decor to approval of Henning Commission. 7. The relation of business to traffic volume and size of streets. Routes of ingress and egress and their. effect on street and pedestrian traffic: - Business is located on public beach walk- way used by beach visitors and .commercial customers. Parking • lot generally full during day light hours spaces available evenings. Parking abuts residences as well as businesses. 8. Proposed exterior signs and decor - Not submitted 9 Number of existing similar establishments in close proximity - Nearest beer bar is about 2C0 feet southerly and owned by applicant. No other beer bars in area. Cocktail lounges are located on Pier 1venue about 500-GQ0 feet from establishment. These are being refurbished and upgraded„ Two restaurants with alcoholic beverages are located on the north side of Pier Avenue at Beach Drive, about 400 feet from proposed establish- ment. 11 Other corisitlerat a. The Polio Department has recommended against the establislune t of a beer bar at this louation. b. All other establishments are located on public streets, are not Orte ted to beach,. c. For the past several years the city has had a juvenile police problem in the area. d. The General Plan indicates the area to be part of a retail shopping district; and 'WHEREAS, the applicants heve indicated that the request is to fil ove an existing business at 1227 Strand known as the Poop Deck to th new loca- tion, and that in their opinion such a move would be beneficial to the area and the city; and V HEREAS, at said hearing a citizen, resident invicinity, submitted that the present establishment is and has been a police problem, that customers have despoiled her property, assaulted her teenage daughter, with no apparent attempt by management to prevent such activity; and WHEREAS, a Planning Commission member has personally obseneved the partial disrobing of a woman by customers on the premises, against her will, with no apparent attempt by the management to control the disorder; and HEREAS, the planned future use of the immediate vicinity include high density residential developments; and WHEREAS , the business can continue at its present location at this time; and • • HEREAS after due consideration. it is the opinion of the Plann.in,g Commission that the proposed use Would not be•compatthle with existing and proposed uses in the area because; io A similar request was denied on December 15, 1969, and conditions in the area have not materially changed since that time. 2. The police report submitted to this Commission, indicated the use was undesirable at this location and recogneranded that the application be denied., '3. The proposed use would he detrimental to tI public; would tend to interfere with quiet enjoyment of a public bathing beach. 4. Based on past experience in. the area, the proposed LIF..0 would create a police problem which does not now exist. 5. The proposed use would be an imposition on existing residents in the immediate vicinity. 6. The proposed use would cause congregation of large numbers of people .in a youth -oriented area. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the CiI:y PlarArting COMIThiSSiOn of Hermosa Beach hereby denies the request as submitted. AYES: GONLID,, COMS, Foote, Mulfinger, Waiters and Chairman Stabler NOES: Norge ABSENT: Comm, Noble and Toole CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P. C. 154-785 has been approved by the Planning Commission of the Cfty of Hermosa each at ,a regular meeting he/4 on the 31st of August, 1970. DATE JAMES Do COLLIS, Secretary LAIRD STALER,Chairman .Aisgast 1.Eq, 1970 TO SUi EC7: Ir aribfer of ON SALE l BEL license &VIM AZT2 is :,nd to ' 3 S?, Gs.#1051141 Atobc4r: T av, f xrd. Pi.s.smitig Director t1li .rn `+. Einr91.ns CAsief of mice The Police ti;epoarttrieant Woe r4Itiert Cine hist I tha Poop Decd. in our current r:•ecs rds eystora, vigiticis dam lack to J rpy A, 1958, ft is reflected the prise as either beteg titi4 location of, the focal point of many pat le i r'eqred SW These require -1 acti.41210 ,1C0 beam widesiced during the: time of csporattasa by tho prtoent cTzmaerto Jebonb it Coalayo Further, d ring the cnueroart roar. Tour ,cormaissitrra a seen fit to deny s Casidities.al Vete .Permit applicants Jack Blies m a3 t. 0224.1d A. leo for the 631 MX1M c typet off licaase ar 9 Dock Bch is to he Iodated 12112 a � RISC Wr1124DATIONt reco "cod that n,pferiweati tresafau ha mot a a; raftlas fret, 1272; Sir A d to l ;1.3 Z Rad, was denied. 5rite losett= of this operation d mara&j ciutaixt Ole psitcitag re= tem is further noth ofs the Stresid than Tgve are proem/way rev to) provide alicime, tro pry. es dist Dolma beer. V ILLLgat BERLEN Chlef of slAce APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 4Y 1215 O Street ; Sacramento, Calif. 95814, (DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION) The, undersigned hereby applies for licenses describedas follows GEOGRAPiCAL CODE . •. �"' Date Issue 3. TYPE(S) , OF TRANSACTION(S)•': City and Zip Code • , County SigittS, 90M ra 6, If Premises Licensed, Show Type`of License 8, ,Mailing Address (if different from 5)— iN , umb rer and Street 'w +a - ' " i a!`i3..�,1 i etlrt tear; 9 Have you'ever been convicted 'of a felony? • RECEIPT 140. Are Premises Inside City -Limits? (Temp) (Perm) 10. Have you ever violated any of the prOYisio; , f the Alcoholtd' Beverage Control "Act orre, ula ions gf :tnt tier. achment which shall be deemed, part of this applici 12. ,Applicant`cigrees (a) that any manager. employed in on -sale licensed premses will have.' 11 the qualifications.•e►f a licensee, •••:; (b) that, he, will not violate, or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic' Beverage Coi p1, Act 3. STATE OF CALIFORNIA -' , ;. County of Under penalty if perjury, each person ,whose signature appears. below, -certifies and says:. (1) He is'the applicant or One of the apOicants,,or Qn execut officer of the applicantcorporation, gamed in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this appl,catlon en ts behalf (2) that; he has�read-the fore= going application, and knows the contents thereof and that each and all of the statements therein made are true; (3)i.that no -person othe► than,the applicant '• or applicants hdl any direct or indirect interest in the applicant's or applicants', business to be conducted under the hcen(s) for Which tis appl'Icdtion is made; , (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered''fnto morn than ninety -.(9Q) days preceeding the day on wluch the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to•or for any criitditorof transferor or to defraud oFilnjure any creditor of transferor. ` 4, .APPLICANT • 'SIGN HERE 4 • APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR F 5 STATE OF. CALIFORNIA -, x y.' �=County of I ii d Date * moi`....... -1---. ' Under penalty :of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is the licensee dr dn exeeutive'officer offhe corporate haenseo,,'•; named in the foregoing transfer application, duly authorized to make this transfer:application' on its behalf (2) that he hereby :makes application to sur ender all interest in the attached license(s) described below and to transfer same. to the applicant and/or location indicated '• an the upper portion of;.this, applica?ion form, if such transfer is approves; by the Director; (3) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is net made to' satisfy the :poymiilt pf a loan or to fulfill'' an agreement entered into more thanninety days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department er to'gain ergestablish a, preference to or for•eny creditor pf transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor, 16. Name(s) of'ticensee(s) r t: _ , ;', 17. Signature(s) of Licensee(s) ` -18.' License Numbers) )Iix.:i1141'I>;sit ri umber and Street Do Not Write Below This Lit}e; For Department Use Only • Attached: 0 Recorded notice, 0 Fiduciary papers,. o Renewal: Fee o ABC -311 eSI�"Ai�31t 1.44 t • ! • Azguet Z1, 1970 TOt Honore -Me iryc Cty CDVACil FROM WilUUM H. Borlta, oda Plic SU E irEC T Llit0Y1 -Pe, a. 0 Trnte. ON ALIE GENERAL pth1ic retInitet Type f4i3, Otar C' f331.7.2 App.;(licamtn t; e Idtatimtet; ChawleeJ wood Vice P &Gme Mgr„ Dwridl E, Leworth 1214:tier EUiviS Lmcw6son: Z2 db a Schlmosavfeldero liertior;4b1e Sire: Ae Per your directiort, C ff0 town izeetated C0.1 the above captionwd Au you TAU note, the izitended ihwyere of Ws entn,blish.. mentisre the owners and tEleg 5Zc ThetmduJ have been cleg.req. 1 through or cIaramelf.V6, and it appezr • 61.4.A everything, la orcivr. 17hefsr:eziftrtJ, e:s..,Z e) lkOlten bott,.(,:,:q.:.1etsf.,kiezzi.,tiort,„ mai &II. other conditions and pzu•Namfarf,rlo Dtaviasel. •cL® with, there seems to be no rma,concy t561pgite&•.114Lom. )pert -mm t eon tr fer of ilicong!*. *5.731 -11l -el • e •PI 7a.r.o Crt;AelPUcc WHfl Aria, • • RESOLUTION P. 1.54-784 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF HER1V1OSA BEACH APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PROVIDE. ENTERTAINMENT AND DANCING AT 22 PIER AVENUE. Vt HEREAS, the City Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach, at a public hearing held August 31, 197G, considered the request of Hermosa Enter- tainment Corporation (Schlurapfelders), for a conditional use permit to provide entertainment and dancing on lot 6, block 12, Hermosa Beach Tract, known as 22 Pier Avenue and ▪ HEREAS, at said hearing the following matters were considered: 1. Distance from reside tial and non-commercial. uses - Nearest residences about 250 feet southerly of premises. 2. Amount of off-street parking - None Property is in Vehicle Parking District Number One. No off-street earking required. Available parking shared by beach asers and other establish- ments. 3. Location of and distance to churches, schools, public play- grounds - No schools in vicinity; nearest church about 600 feet to north east; public beach playground about 100 feet ' south west. 4. Hours of operation - Daily - 4:00 p. m. to 2:00 a. m. 5. Combination of uses - Serving of liquor, live entertainment, (music) and danci• g. i. Precautions taken by owner to assure compatibility of the use with surrounding areas - None, beyond patterning the business after Pier 52, remodelling and renovating the premises. 7. The relation of business to traffic volume and size of streets, routes of ingress and egress and their effect on street and pedestrian traffic - Business fronts cm Pier Avenu*, has access to public parking lot in rear. Traffic is heavy at all times, cir- culates between Pier and parking lot through alley. There is and will continue to be a conflict with pedestrian traffic. To the extnt that the entertainment and dancing increase the business of the establishment, this conflict will be increased. tf- • • -2- 8. Proposed exterior signs and decor - Not submitted. 9. Number of similar establishments in close proximity - Two, in same block - Lighthouse and Pier 52. 10 Other considerations - Operators have maintained successful establishment in same zone and vicinity. Establishment as been a low quality bar in the past; and WHEREAS, after due consideration, it is the opinion of the Planning Commis- sion that subject to certain conditions, the proposed use would be compatible with existing and proposed uses in the area; NOW THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach hereby grants the Conditional Use Permit as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of entertainment and dancing not to exceed 4:00 po m, to 2:00 a. m. seven days a week; 2. Final floor plan and elevations, dolor and signs to be approved by Improvement Commission. 3 Steps to control sound to be taken as recomm*nded by the Build- ing Department with all sound to be confined to the premises. 4. The permit to be reviewed in one year by the Planning Commission. 5. If the liquor license changes ownership, the Planning Commission will again review the permit. 6. Exterior signs advertising music and dancing are not approved et this time. AYES: Collis, Foote„ Mdfinger, atters, and Chairman Stabler NOES: Ione ABSENT: Noble and Toole CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P. C. 154-784 has been approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting held on the 31st of .August, /970. DATE JAMES D. COLLIS, Secretary LAIRD STABLER, Chairman - Do"not detach turn alt copies Do Not APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) 1. NAME(S) OF LICENSE(S) e Above This Line—For Hectdquarters ice On To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 1215 0 Street Sacramento, -Calif. 95814 (DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION) The undersigned hereby applies for licenses described as follows: 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) Date Issued Temp. Permit Applied under Sec. 24044 Effective Date:, 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) 5. Location of Business—Number' and Street City and Zip Code County 6. IfPremises Licensed, -r Show Type of License 8. Mailing Address (if different from 5)—Number and Street t 9. Have you ever been coni cted of a felony? y �f RECEIPT NO. �`1 �} � ""�i , TOTAL 7. Are Premises Inside City Limits? ,. (Temp) (Perm) 10. Have you, ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act or regulations of tne, Deportment per- taining to the Act? f`1D 11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10`on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. 12. Applicant agrees (a) thatany, manager employed in on -sale licensed 'premises will have alt`'th'e qualifications '.of'"a licensee, and (b) thathe will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic _ Beverage Control Act. ; 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County " of ate' Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below,' certifies and says: (1) Heis'"the applicant, or one ef° the `applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application en its behalf (2) Mot Ise has read the fore- going application and kno)srs the contents thereof and,,that each and all of the stotenients therein made are true; t9)'thot no person other than the applicant' -or applicants' has any director indirrect interest in the applicant's or applicants' business to be conducted' under the litense(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or -Proposed transfer is not made to iatisfy the payment o a loan or fulfill on agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or far any creditor of transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor. 14. APPLICANT ,— SIGN HERE):...: APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 15. STATE 0 CALIFORNIAt. County of ' - a Date Under penalty "of'perjury,,each person whoa signature, appears below, Ycertifies and says: (1) He is the licensee, or an executive office of the;corporate-licensee, named in the foregoing transfer application, duly authorized to make this transfer application on its behalf; (2).that tie hereby,rnakes, application to surrender all interest .in the attached,,ltcense(s)'describ`ed below and to transfer some to the applicant and/or location indicated on the, upper portionof this application form, if such transfer is approved by the Director; (3) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not madeta satisfy thepayment of a loan or to -fulfill anRagreement entered into more than ninety days preceding the day ^on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or' for any credi'tor of transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor. 17. Signature(s) of Licensee(s) 1 License Numbers) 'I6. Name(s) of Licensee(s) umber and Street City and Zip Code County Do Not Write Below This Line; For Department Use Only Attached: 21 Recorded notice, .lr ❑ Fiduciary papers, COPIES MAILED ' ❑ (OTHER) Renewral: Fee of __ Paid at Office on— ABC-211 nsABC-211 (11.89) '11 c. r� Receipt No. osP • • ADDENDUM. TO MUTES BUSINE5S PERMIT REVIEW BOARD CITY OP HERMOSA BEACH SEPTEMBER 3 1970 CASE N0 70-8 Nam:: Rumbleseat Tavern pplicant: Joanna Angel Address: 530 Pacific Cow st Highuay Type of Business: Tavern. STAFF PRESENTATION AND BOARD QUESTIONING Continuation fro last week due to lack of Police Report, affe now received.- same and everything is in order. Finance Office reaeived a letter from Ws Kato Parts August 3] 1970 stating app.roval of the business and ,17 -:.ging favorable action. PUBLIC PARTICT.PA TION Public Hearinq Opsnact - Yes The applicant stated that the operation would generally be the smle as the previous cimers, Mt. Bargam said that the S.W. Corner Of the buildirg aeeded to be repaired and the Southernly Ilan needed to be painted. Pabli HePr , Closed: es DfCISTON Notion - Trott To grant license with eon 1. A review period in 60 dcys 2. The exterior v7..dis -of the lding to be one color but the tri a may be another color to comply with t.t.ie Sign Ordinance and Building ?emit required for insl,Filaton, 3. Street and sidewalk in front of the store to be t.,..spt free of litter and in case of a parking area to be kcpt in tr\ neat manner. Business to he opernt-W as represented to the aosiness Permit Review Board. 5 All City Ordinames - State and Federal laws to Le ',,,,oup2ied with. Sii,gaorid Fowler ADDENDUM TO MINUTES BUSINESS PERMIT REVIEW BOARD C:9:'._':+: OF HEi MOSA BEACH ,SEV,M6BER 3r, 1970 CASE NO. 70-8 Continued 60 'he S %d Corner to be repa,imd and the Southerly exterior .vall to he pail ted. 1/91- Ayes.- Trott end Yolder N ,es None Results announcedo Yes September 11, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Payroll Services Contract/Data Processing Study. Gentlemen: As earlier reported to the City Council, one of the moves which we have been contemplating to reduce personnel cost and gain greater efficiency in our finance operations is the shift to a contractual payroll service. To this end, we have exhaustively reviewed the services available from banks and service bureaus in light of our needs. In this study, we have received invaluable assistance from Ed Bolton, without extra charge, as a supplement to his work on the major three city data processing study. We have now completed our evaluation and are in a position to take action. It is therefore recommended that the City Manager be authorized to enter into a contract with the Bank of America for bi-weekly peirsoli. services. Bank of Ataertca was finally evaluated as the firm best ab`de to meet all of our requirements° with the greatest experience in this field, and at the best price. although all pricing was relatively similar. U.C.B. is aggres- sively attempting to enter this field, and offers a very good package, but we feel that Bank of America represents a slightly better choice. The cost per payroll will be approximately $110.00. This cost alone will almost be offset by the equivalent personnel cost which we would ordin- arily bear to perform the same operations. However, further reductions in our personnel cost from preparation and other record keeping time will be- come apparent after the system gets started, but cannot be definitely iden- tified prior to moving into the data contract. In addition, we will receive more acs: !grata computations and records, including those related to fringe bsnekti statt '_ cs, then we are now able to produce manually. We are prepa o: to implement the new system immediately upon approval. Data Proceastna Study Transmitted with this agenda is the completed three -city data processing study, which was just received today (Friday) . This consists of a short separate summary and the main volume of the study. Neither Ron nor I IZ54,P,SW '4‘1.):Cg ..'71" 1Lcviv5q taA7 • E:7.77•:, 1.;!.:.;11 r: 21:47c.i.qo C t- E „ a , , `itb5d: ItteiriSIqq.c,t 1V470.17/ SAT eV! • tar, r6.1 El.:;11A7 ltnit,;(rion ofoi. th.riVi7 t3,t75,061A !;.,;(3 S '77" • , 1jup 71p.:Ii f.7" 0 „TY F„; AemorilftsOf c- pri.kitqra.1,:z;h5 • z .7 T. ,!;.5,i C.5,7 "rCi, ;`, 74: Sci.,t6,0 eF.1•6!. tern,t,F, iq Ot 1111'P'..) .f..1!:W.3: 240* le.4*inoeTsiq f'3+ ,•;H VOiTi 7,01•7q, 1E5 11q$17.*.t* *OS (t !").76' . • f;'5 "Ifs' rtqw. belit .1. aavy !It:411w brio y'retturtue e.S.e.416q,;r2: Page 2 (Payroll Services Contract) have had a chance to evaluate it all either so no action is contemplated at this time. The material is being transmitted for your study and our later discussion. Respectfully submitted, c , Th.m 'WESLEY C. MC DANIEL City Manager WCM«learn ' Enclosure •". t."--) 0 "7".1:. 5,71 • Vites1.73 4. GoWasts, a A. VverfO G. OV3202.1f3G14,11...0 fa. ACCOVNVAtirPg thfyie) gla„milVe4m flOte:t. ewcw.ir obalyr KINDC=4"1 • ikeitO mucefew• ERIASSOI, CAVIIIMPSMI August 14, INV SOMME CtTY COONCEL CI 1.4..atlfi NACU Norma* Resoh,, C httn: RV. Woe/ey C. McDaniel., City Mannar Gentleimn: %to aro asauNdns thmt .Vvu slat man %a eonoidering am necoolgAing ttem to audit the kooks and seeounto foo yew City for the year 070-71. IM COMM4VA thereuRth, WQ outztt din asaltwevs BIG • 4% Mg e • /I 4' HO will micke &It audit of' the 1badka mnd accounts la atl d4wartments in the City of Nara:sae beach for a fee of 02,24A.M. nie gill edea© inclade AM audit of tho account@ am4 renords of tha Urea R*rownsunt Hand MIAs. . . . ve fee ia. od o our ewpsvficecli in auditing the accounts of your City during the past feiv years. Our anditing TVICOO and pro- cedures will be parfornod. in the 62M mnaor.as in prior- yenta. , - Supervisory and consultation 06TVICOA will be rendered throughout .don year if you ao desire. Ve wish to thank you for your coueadmration tn this matter and hope -that OUT work has been satisfactory in tho past.• • Reapecaidly cukmitted, , - aftza4.— 44 TOM mocumo : A4countatts Auditors 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. N. S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING COTTON Aft FRANCISCO AS CITY AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL .YEAR 1970-!-71, AND AUTHORIZING THEM ALSO TO PREPARE - AND SUBMIT TO ME STATE CONTROLLER ANNUAL STREET'REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIO 215/ OF TIE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS COD. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIE OF BERWSR AC CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS POLLO SECT/ON 1.. That the PUblic AccouDtant fialViat •Cot4lat Francisco be, and they hereby are, appointed aa Auditars. for the City of Hermosa B ech during the fi,?3cal yeag.1914n.71...OM the terms set forth in their letter of huguit 14, 1970. SECWIOU 2. That stO firm of OOtt efltratactslco, City Auditors of said City, be and they are hey appointed mad employed to prepare and file with the Controller of the State of California annual Street Report pursuant to the proviaiona of Section 2151 of the Streets and Highways Code as added by the Collier -Burns Act of 1947 (Ch. 11, Statutea 1947, Extra Session). ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED end ADOPTED this I;RESIDERT ex the City-Coacil,-and .--- . MAYOR. of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS 1 FORM: CITY ATTORNEY a.a.•111.1....19012W.rar.{..aireamaoMmamp...../...WMIPAaNKOW.16••••.s.e..awmartream•bree September 11, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Parking Lot Lease Renewal Gentlemen: The otty annually leases from the California Water Service Company a portton of their pump site property located on First Street just east of Pacific COMM Highway. This lease, at a cost of $05.00 per year, is for parking purses. It has additional value in maintaining a degree of city control and involvement over this property for potential later change or reuse. The 'renewal period for this lease comes in late September of each year, and it is recommended that the city renew the agreement, sub- ject to California Water Service Company°s approval, once again. W CM:mm► Respectfully submitted, "4,) e .ter, . WESLEY C. MC DANIEL City Manager • • , • c;IVI s4415`iation • „ vetieelft, 5 'JAY: POI >hall ITO at if.; ;iti V.113QM.00 ,7; ' • . ittiouremleito qmuct al. lef300, Onlora • tat /II rJ:1! a9aoctusq ptilsq h&1•0111f100r TOO .".(t epineez) oeq16trror,.. ai fl FW '51'.!/.3 t>57•K'' :;-;;; •: Z.' • ." • • ...g6S.Ar 51f110,11 /60 03' Mint MOW • September 11, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council PROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: S. P. C. A. Agreement Gentlemen: The renewal time for the annual S. P. C.A. agreement has arrived, and it is recommended that authorization be approved for this action. The revenue and expenditure is contained within the adopted budget. Respectfully submitted, - ) C. t WESLEY C. MC DANIEL City Manager VVCM:mm 1/ esti 8. 7e, r.1,7/nrS1•r. Efr , /.7:*j.f.! 7). Asrcs ,„‘ 45 41,;31V. :0,1* , :M0511 q gT03101. 18 :rmraWtrior, ffLIsittrortm. otiT .t.1 bris 701 .E.91/0qq6 ..; 17:+ST/16371C0 rnmaVION September 11, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Assessment District 69-1 (Sewers) Gentlemen: Following the City Council's approval at the last meeting of the agreement with Redondo Beach for payment relative to use of their pump station and outfaI1 lines, we are in a position to begin the march toward formation of th o District. The first step is to adopt a preliminary resolution of intention to form the District, and to approv the plans and s ectficattons for the work to be done. Both of these documents are expected in the mail today, and certainly will be available by Tuesday evening. We therefore would recommend that these initial steps be taken. A letter from the County Health Officer is also attached, which is necessary to give added weight to the City Council's action to approving the District. With such a report from. the Health Officer, the City Council is authorized to order the District created even In the face of a majority protest, should that event occur at the protest hearing. We will be prepared to explain the. procedural steps in greater detetl et the meeting, should ;;his be desired. Reupec:t uliy frObil fitted, 'WESLEY Co MC DANIEL City Manager WCMunm Enclosure go • • ;' ;• • w :M0577: ek T0318118 11) 0 jjpal faroii01 0.ati 4:1 VI S.lerrin•al.ps 9,311* .f."4" •:,:x7f zu 6 qpinict 71.-pfi 1:0 ':•C, • tttp5d tuv 7711j1.•, • t?,.t qa$e., le91 9/Tr 117101: Ct :how etit "f-Aj efft wAr optti riev rin;fro nd egote ((Z'41 791/st A •:":11 r,,Ut)f.WOn --Vit4 y76e690911 '2•prtiVOlglo rT. • -7:• ;!.' VZ:11 0 OM' lo Pool Prit rt IBRIOM „ . . oct ifiw el& • . 1541 ftetftt trurnIVIDW suffeolarti RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING PLANS, PROFILES, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATES OF COST AND MAP OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE IMPROVEN)ENT IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 69-i WHEREAS, the City Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach, California) has submitted to the City Council, pursuant to. its order,.plans, profiles, specifications, estimates of cost and.map Of the.Assessment District for the construction of im- proyements and acquisition in ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 69-i, in said Cityv. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:' SECTION 1. That the plans, profiles, specifications, esti- mats of cost and map of the Assessment District (ASSESSMENT . DISTRICT NO. 69-1) of that City of Hermosa Beach, California, be . • ii16 the same arc each •hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 2. That the said plans, profiles, specifications, 'send estimates of cast shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, and copies thereof in the of fie of the City Clerk of , . said City. That said original map of said Assessment District, ' and one copy thereof, be filed in the.offiCe of the City Clerk ' and a copy thereof in the office of the City Engineer. APPROVED and ADOPTED this. day of 1970. MAYOR OF THE CITY OX' HERMOSA BEACH, .CALIFORNIA ATTESTt. , ENTIELEE-WW-141 CITTOF • HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA • /-c • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES HEALTH DEPARTMENT 220 NORTH BROADWAY, LOS ANGELES, CALIFoRNIA 9001.? G. A. HEIDBREDER, M.D., M.P.H. HEALTH OFFICER Honorable City Council City of Hermosa Beach City Hall Hermosa achy California Oentlessems Subjects Jar 22; 1970 Beat% Assessmast Distriet 069-1 Recommendations It is pew b installed i this inslysiss 'PA"..ge41; 4., it that tars' sowers TELEPHONE 625.3212 has ssda am isvestigation,of the subject t district lecated on 70 St.- St. in the sa ash, During the course of this brews sties, 32 Itawni-to-house calls mere made, Of this number, 1,0 opt s uere not A hi or t d not answer the door. Of the 22 property °mere or tenants setually oontastedy 13 or 5'0,, r having experienced trouble with their individual axtbaturface s sss,v exposed systems. They oonplained of the s to filling sty sensing raw gssoge to back up into the house plumbing fixtures or to overflow onto the sarfaoc of the ground. Frequent pompsng cleaning out of the seepage pita or the sItruction of new pita use necessary() Tho h mithin the area of this proposed years ads The effective percolation surfaces becoming elo ed mith an as,s" stion of gre,1,1 systems inoperstives tarr strict are 15 or more f the seepage pits are apparently d sludge; thereby making the Tier of our ourveyy1, the undornimmIEWs1s,s Officer of th,: County of LOB el sy having been officially des,y:cted by the City Council of the City of Roach to perform public health services is the City 4 Hermosa Beach; do hereby respectfully recommend that proceedings be ingtitated at onto far the in stellation of sanitary WillerS Ln this diAriet'a4 improvement necessary to the protection of nubile kaaltho This reeomntion la made pursuant the pro- visions of Section' d4of the Streets and Mi toys Code() 4'44; Very tray youroy So At, HEis .titX Ar,!. Health Officer ems tity.of biomass Beach (2) 'Dry Heidbreder Dr, tort Mto Msbulashorg • • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED PUR- SUANT•TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2808 OF DIVISION 4, OF. THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA -(ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NQ 69-1) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, has received a recommendation from the Health Officer of the County of Los Angeles, also acting as Health Officer of • the City of Hermosa Beach, for the construction of sanitary sewers in what is known as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 69-1 as shown on the . plane heretofore approved by the City CouncilI and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered said recoi mendation of said Health Officer and has received information from the City Engineer with reference to the proposed sewer im- provemenies, particularly referred to in said recommendation. • N04: THERZFORE. 7fla7. (I COUNCIL OF TH2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ChLIPORNYA, DOES HERSEY RESOLVE, DECLARE, YIND, DETERMINE AHD ORD= FOLLOWSt .SECTXONl. That the improvements referred to in .said Health Officer's recommendation are for the construction of sanitary, ..sewere, together with. appurtenances and appurtenant work in con • .nection therewith, in what is known aa ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 69-1$ es shown on the plans for said improvement heretalFore ap- proved by the City Council and ordered filed in the office of the Cx • City Engineer.. SECTION 2. That said City Council doe hereby find and determine that the construction of said sanitary sewers, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, and each of them, is necessary as a health measure, and the neces- • 4, Sity for sudh construction is hereby found to exist. . SECTION 3m That this Resolution is adopted opted pursuant to the provisions . of Section 2808 of Division 4 of the Streets and High- ways Code of the State of California and the City Council in adopting this Resolution intends to meet each and every condition and to make e d and every finding' neoe ssary on its part in order to permit the proc dings for sai,d improvement to go forward to completion without ft rthor reference to, compliance with, or ap- plication Of, the provisiona of said Division 4 of said Streets SE;;CT O$ 4 That rhe. opinion of the e alth Officer' of the •':•_County of 171 Angeles, dated the 22nd -day of July, 1970, be spread upon th-minuter, of this meetings and th ' sam is hereby "Yaccepted by this City Council.' .SECTIONwap That said. improvement. is necessary also for the a a! tants't Nad use of the property benefited, and that such pyolest 1si fe ssibleo and that fie l .nda to be assessed will be ably to carry the burdisn. 'c+f' such proposed aobessMent. ROVE a; and PDOPTED thin, �,. day o: MAYOR OF -P CITY -OP .�.� BES.C? i CALIFORNIA cam E CAS `atm CITY AF HERMOSA BEAU CALIFORNIA • RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION OP' THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF INTENTION FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT NO. 69-1 AND.REQUESTING CONSENT TO THE FORMATION OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO THE PROPOSED WORK AND ASSUMPTION OF JURISDICTION FOR ALL PURPOSES, THEREM,- WHEREAS, the city Ceuncil of the City of Hermosa 'Beach, California.; is ccntemplating...the construction o0 certmin improve- ments td4ether with acquisitions'in.ASSESSMENT-DISTRICT NO. 69-1 under thti. provisions of the mImprovement Act of 1911", being Division . . . 7 of the Stitets,and Highways_Code of the State -of California, . . all as described in the 'proposed Resolution of Intention herein- fter referred, to awl attached/ -and • . •• • . : WHSREASo this Council by resolution does hereby find and • determine that the public itteresti, convenience and necessity ..• . • . • r9quires the. acquisition:and improvements as set forth in the • .. 1:44o -sod Resolution of'Intention hereto attached/ and , • , • : , • WEMS, certain pariradsoethe'-‘4olik are to be constructed within the.boundaries of the City of. Redondo.Deach; and Dm*, tEtREIPORE, TRNCITY600kCIL OP T CITY OF.SERMOSA are.ACHg. . - . .!:CALIEFORNIPA, /MS 1112814BY lesor.a4 -As womaxst . . • • . . • . • .. ' • . I • . . . . steTiom 1. That the- publicAnterest, convenience and neces-• city requires the acquisition and construction of certain improve- • • manta in ASSUSMENT DISTRICT N40. 69-1.411. ati set forth in the • '-'...--proposed Resolution of Intention which is:hereby approved as to .-.:. • " .• • . • •!'• form and attached hereto/ and theU4h certain proposed work affectS '..-,... __ • • ,. ' : —, property outside, of the blyundaries of the City' of Hermosa $.,, each, -; ,....'„•;, :it can best be ,accomplished by a. single ccmPrehenSive scheme of • , :***v.- • work.' . . ONCT/ON-2. That, the 04q.en#,Ohe City of Redondo Beach . be And ltle same is herebk reque4,ted .assupption of jurisdiction • ' ••••- • . . of this City Council for all purposes aE: ses o4 the proc .'odings, and to authorize a they City Council of the City of Hermes Veach to proceed and take each and every step re.l,uir:: ed for the consum- mation of the work extending outs..:de the t7rtty d.a`.. i ;v of the City of Hermosa lieach, all p1:.`,.°sUlmd'2t to ne provision f.x. the "Improve- ment Act of 1911% heing D w .g;t.oY, _ of the S „..: eQt 3and Highways Code of "he' estate of Cal:i.forni SnCTXON 3.. That the City .:i erk hereaby:: t reet c d to transmit a certified. copy of this Resolution and of the attached proposed Resolution of intention to the City Council o§ ;' ; M; City of Redondo FBe ao PRO S and ,yD PT2D thi ,�.,o..�. day � '�.,. �=..j �tg7oo W. Eli 1:+6E M HERMtSSA MACH, ChL'aIFORYXIi, M4XOR OP OF 1 • • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OP TDB CITY COUVC.XL OF THE CIT1Z OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING 7:.T nyryanxon To ORDER THE CONFTRUCTION OP C7M• - TA/N IMPROVEMENTS AND ACQUISITION TOGETE3 WITH APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT wORX CONNECTION THEREWITH IN ASSESSMENT DD-3TRa.T NO. 69-1; DECLARING THE WORK TO ES OP THAN LOCA19 OR ORDINARY PUBLIC Ft;NEFIT ;r00 DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TOBE PITY •SAID WORK AND TO. PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSh:74 AND FIXING A TIME ANL PLACE FOR HEARING aECTIONS TO SAID WORK AND ACQUISITION AND PROVID/NG POR THE ISSUAN= OF BOVi.X3 .11HEREASe the City Council o the City of He=pzia 11,;oac Californiae,pursuant to the pxdvions of "Impulcut'Act .of 1911", being Divizion 7 og the Vtreet and alqhway Code of. the State of California, does hereby r6sQlve az '.irc,1.11,ow.;: • SITITXON 1. That t1 public intoreet cm.tlzniencie and neceseity roquiret und it i the intention c ih cty council of_thc War of Hermosa. Beach,CelitOrniv, to trdvg•' -ing work And,acquisi ipn to be dime, to vitr, ?x0RxgrUag, That the public interezt, c*nvcniatwe'..twn6 neceszty ro- quike the 6cquisitiono the kollowing CAPAelITTS 1,110X:.M Capacity in and x.7g.I.V;„ to ugci snwags dopooal Recilit;i4E in City of aedono Bearzb p.iw,;4*m U)ret,r, in Mexgan.Lane And Hayne Lane where t.$aid r;trostE inter- •, sect with the City-of'Oermosa Boach- MTCP,IPTI,pN 0? T' NOM, The construction of ce-e:,ain oanitNcy,ewnr .rFlprrovemente together with appurtenances and appurtenant wor connection- • therewith, in • . • • • • 8TH STREET betren ynolds Lane (City "Dcyandaxy Urm) znel LrA 53, Block 1400 Redondo Villa Tract, and in 7TH STREET ' between Reynolds Lane (City ;boundary line) and Lot - 51, Block 1390' Redondo Villa 't'r'act, including necessary work to connect •into sewer tines in Haynes Lane and. Morgan. Lane, City of Redondo Beach, PLANS . PROFILES AND SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 2. All of the Jaid Fork and improvement to be done :nshall be constructed upon the' grades, along the lines, between the :points of .the dimensions, at the places . and in the manner shin on the .pians and profiles for said improvement, on file in. the office of the City ' Engineer of said City,, and ' except as - otherwise provided on said, pians; in further accordance with the specifications for• the construction of said improvement, said specifications being on file in.the office of said Engineer and In the. office of the .City Clerk of .said City, and to which 'pians, profiles and specificatione heretofore approved by the City Council :. of ma d Cite reference is hereby made for a further, full and ...more.particular description of said work, and .proposed grades, and they shall govern as to'all details. DESCRIPTION OF ASMEEKEELRISTRICT ti SECTION 3a In the Counc.0 e opinion, said pork and acquie sition is 'of such, nature that the costs and expenses should be assessed in proportion to estimated • benefitea and the Council hereby makers the assessable costs and expenses chargeable upon a district, which the. Council dec1a?cs to be the district bene- fited by said work or . i,mpr ovement. and to ibe assessed to pay said costa and expenses, Said distr .ct is described by map entitled., "MAP OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 69-1", on file, in. the office of nthe City Clerk. Said map shall govern for a/1 details as to the ;•* • • • extent of sad Assessment District. AlI publc streets and ways • or portions thereof, within, saie, district omitted from the assessment t e made to covey: eosts.and oxpenses of the work or improvement. MSCRIPTTON Ow BMDS STICTION 4,,TtAt Seaal "rFlonc,U, 'iacraring :Intorent at the rate of 'sewn percent MO per annum,.shtI 1.)e o'suea ,,5,•• represent each ansessment of Fifty boi.14ra ,A150.00) voone,:remainiyig un- paid Eor thirty (30) days ai!ter the date of mailing ol! Notices pursuant t Section 5390 oZ the Streets zri.r.1.•15.• Code.. Said Ee ondi:.shall extend over perie,dg-11*. t',A yearn :from th second day of January net stleceeains the 1.),et .c'eptembei: first followirff their de Pavrrtq on 41w, rvf- assessmento and interest thexelon. shall he -made by property awnrs to.the City Ti and, the same ohall be asbunmd by said City Treasurstr,,. all ES proviacd:iA the "Imprevement..%ct of 1911", •• . .'•- hereinaftcr.referree '• TFEE nal') ?VINCI, OF vt.T.tams7 um TA oc aws...,trac a,vAan nre,,,ar.; rgi.,4';1' ECTXQN 5. Notice :Lb hereby•viveo-thclAt on the of cc,t thc: iseavnevatamme.c-nmr,,ra., C9,4 MAIISMIleM.Nein.....Z.111t0 day • the. Council Chambero locatedi in:the Q.t..;nttz• nuilding in the • City v,f Wermosa•Beach, Caliorniar•an An41.3.yorsons having any.cbjections to tho propeeed meTX, acqueition v.c•improvement " to -the =tent.• of tho Aoses4,ment Distr'ict or to thi., propozed I, -grades may appearund show cause why sai6 work shou%C, be done .or carried out Ln accordance with this Aeooluton o Intention. Proteots must be in writin and wust.1)e t* the -:„ • • Clel*'prior to. the 1...t t for the ZMPROVIOMT SPICTION.6. That thi• workhi n ohall dOne' throur0 4r -,realtAnce to an P.,ct (17,1F: the Legislature , . -3- • • of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 191,1",.:being Division 7 o the Streets and Highways Cede of the Stateof California. NECESSITY FOR IMPROVEMENT SECTION 7. That these proceedings have been instituted upon the recommendation of the Health'Officer for the City of Hermosa Beach,',California, underSection.2808 o$,! the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, wherein said Health Officer . states the necessity for the installation and construction of certain improvements herein set forth as a health measure., That - - said City C;Vnoil dose hereby find and determine that the con struction of said"sanitary sewers, together with the appurtenances .and -appurtenant work therewith, As necessaryas a health measure. • - • Total Estimated . Construction Costs • Total Estimated Incidental Costs: • •• Total. Estimated Acquisition Costs: • - 'ot aEstiMated Coats: q 26,256.00 6 00.00 - - /, 335750.31 PUBLICATION'OF RESOLUTIO$ op INTENTION SECTIOS EL The "EXEIRMOSA. BEACH REVXgre, a newspaper.pub- • lished and oL general circulation in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby designated az the newspaper in which this Resolution of intention shall be published by the City Clerk in •the mann and farm provided by law.: The City Clerk is directed to mail. Notices of the Adoption of.this Resolution of Intention to all persons owning real pro- , . po:ty"proposed to be assessed, whose names and addresses appear . on the last equalized assessment roll to City taxese all in the . • • • • • manner and form provided for under Sections 5070,. 5194 and 5195 r of the `° Improvement Act of 1911% of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 'POSTING OF NOTICE: OF IMPROVEMENT • SECTXOJ S.' The Superintendent of Streets of the City, oaf Hermosa 8eacla,,, California, shall cause to be conspicuously posted along the lime of said contemplated work or Improvement and along 11' open etreete within th .district liable to be assessed far said woet, notices of the passage of this Resolution on of Intention in the tie„ form and manner provided by said Code. SECTXO 1 ,The City Clark shall certify to the passage of this Re;rsol.ution and obeli cause the same to be published twice by two (2) separate, consecutive insertions in the above designated newspaper. The -first publication shall. be made not less than ten (LO) days prior, to•thea . date of .the public hearing stated hetei.n, FILING MAP -OF ASSEITAMEOTRDW. SECTION 11. The City Clerk is directed to endorse on the ,originel and on at least . one copy of the map 'or plat of the as- sescment district as referred to in, Section 4 hereof. 1-Aer certifi- cate evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution of In- .•'tention,a middle is further directed t, 'f le th ,,oxiginai. of such map or plat in this office and within fifteen. (15)- days after the adoption of this Resolution and in no event later than fif- teen (1..5) days prior •to the date of hearing as. Provided in Sec- ` tion •'S hereof,she is further directed to file a copy of said map or plan with her endorsement the reon, . wiih the County Recorder of Loa Angeles County, California, al/ in the manner and force provided for in Section 3+1U of...tFae Streets,..and Highways hwayss. Code of the State of .California the' event the woes is ,not completed within • the' time limit specified in the contract or within such further time as may be extended, the City shall chaarge the contractor liquidated damages in the net amount of ._$40.00 for each day of delay until the work is.ccmplete(L APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of l970 ATTEST: CITY CLERK ° THE. CITY OF _...e .D HERMOSA BRACH, CALIFORNIA MAYOR OF THE CITY OF FiERMOSA BEACH .CALIFORNIA • (MIN '1" ICE RC . N. S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY or i ER OS , EEACH. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING C°n:ApTfra 5, "BEACH, BOATS AND MUNICIPAL PIER", OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY REVISING SECTION 5-10, ""a' ic.C}=i?:i.NG M.LLS, ETC., ON BEACH"'. TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP HERY OSA 'EACH, CALIFORNIA, DES ORDAIN AS POLLO S t SECT :`3J 1. That Chapter 5, 'Beach; Ec ate and Municipal per", of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, Section 5--10N "Throwing Rally etc. on Beach", , be amended 4 to read aid a . fol.l P Section 5-1O zo €inALW 2Lsj tc. r032 beach, 'No person shall cast, bat, toss, throw, kick or roll any ball, tube, boomerang, flying saucer, or any similar object, or use any volleyball or other athletic equipment, or conduct or participate in any sport or game at any place upon or over the bench outside of an area provided therefor. No person shall conduct or partici p;.,te in any sand throwing ff blanket throwing, Or any sport that constitutes a hazard to zmy pea's= on the beach. No E!port o tl'arc wing of missiles of any kind ; Mil be permitted upon the Stray d walkway. cgpti n n This :+roi ibition shall l not appiy to. any activity which .is part of a supervise ise «! opoz t: = event or recreation n activfity of the City, nor to any activity expxess ly approved 'by the Park and Recreation Commission ors tlle City Council. • SECTION 2. This ore inanco shall take effe t thirty days after the: date of it.a adoption. SECTION 3. The City Cr};eshall certify to the adoption of this ordinance, and shall prior to the expiration of fifteen.. days from the adoption thereof cause the oai.e to be publ i.she d at least once in the. Hermosa Search Review, weekly anempaper of general circulation, pliblished and circulated Ln.the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTESTT A' : 'R(AIED AS TO FORM a P ESiDEliT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Reach, California CITY CLERK CITY -ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. e N. S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANTING COMMISSION AS CONTAINED Di ITS RESOLUTION P.C. 154-773 DENYING A CHANGE IN LAND USE ZONE CLASS/FIC ,PION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL TO MGL ° PLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, COVERING PROPERTY LOCAT1 D AT 731-6737-739 TWENTY-FIRST STREET, AS PETITIONED BY MANES PUCILE. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commi ten, after hearings duly held on April 6 and April 20a 1970, as provided, by Zoning Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended0 .did .in I. peolution !,C. 154-7710 adopted April 20, 1970, day the application of qames &Pucile for a. change of 1 n us done claseification on Lot 20, 21 and 22, Hermosa View Tract No. 1, for the facts and reasons cited in said resolution; and WHEREAS, pursuaantto the terms and provisions of said Zoning Ordinance said applicant has taken n his appeal from the determination and action of said Commission to the City Council and before said Council a public hearing wheld on May 19, 1970, at which all interested pal~ tie were given an opportunity to be heard with respect to said appeal; and WHEREAS, said Council did determine that the public interest would best be served by referring said application back to the Planning Commission for further report before making its final decision, and did direct said Ciesion to study not only the sub j ct property but also the adjacent area in relation thereto; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and investigate facts bearing upon the subject application and the zoning pattern of an area lying between Twenty -First Street and Twenty -Fourth Place and between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway at meetings held on June 1 and June 15, 1970, and did ireport to the City Council at the regular meeting of said Council held on July 7, 1970, recommending ¢.bat the Council sustain their action denying the subject zone change at this time, and said Council did again refer said request for a zone change to the Planning Commission for further review, and directed said Con mission to inform all interested parties of the date and time set for said review; and •S WHEREAS, after a4 review hearing held by the ...nanning Commission on August 18, 1970, said Commission did transmit to the City Council a report and recommendation advising no change to high density residential zoning in the subject area at this time and supporting Resolution P.C. 154-771, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the findings and conclusions of the Planning Commission are adopted by the City Council. SECTION 2. That the on change from Single -Family Resideth with Commercial Potential to Multiple -Family Residential covering property located at. 731-737-739 Twenty -First Street kit, not in the best interests and general welfare of the City Of Hermosa, Beach and is hereby denied. • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED thi thy of , 1970. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermes Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY • First Draft RESOLUTION NO, N. S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, • CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPLICATION OF HAROLD MARGRAVE FOR A ZONE VARIANCE COVERING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 144 AND 148 LYNDON STREET, AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, WHEREAS, an application for a zone variance signed by Harold Marg -ave has heretofore been filed requesting a variance to permit erection of two four -unit apartment housese one on each lot, in lieu of maximum allowable of two units per lot on property describeei as Lots 9 end 10, Block 42, First Addition to Hermoea Beach; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment duly consideredeald application at a hearing thereon as provided in Zoning'Ordinance No, N, S 154, as amended, and an opportunity was given to all parties concerned, to be heard with respect to said application; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment did recommend that said variance be granted for facts and reasons recited in Resolution B,Z.A. 154-20, adopted June 8, 1970, and an appeal dated June 10, 1970 was received from an adjacent property owner and filed with the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council at pUblichearings held on July 7 July 21 and August 4, 1970 did give all interested parties anopportunito to be heard with respect to said appeal and WHEREAS, a substantial number of residents adjoining the property for which the exception to Zoning Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended,was requested has objected thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the public Interest would best be 'served by referring said application back to the Board of Zoning Adjustment for further report before making its decision final and WHEREAS, the Board of &ming Adjustment after review of this application at a regular meeting held on August 24, 1970, did adopt Resolution LZ.A. 154-27, recommending that the applicant be denied the zone variance for the following reasons: 1. The Planning Commission has determined that a general study of area is needed and the proposed development might not be compatible to the future growth of the area, 2.. The Board of Zoning Adjustment in granting this variance acted in haste without • the full knowledge of the pending improvements planned for the rea and the intent of the zoning ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOS HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, That it now appears that it is the desire and intent of the application to use said property for uses which in the judgm °int of the City Council would be materially detrimental to the public welfare and to the property of other persons located in the vicinity, and in conflict with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. SECTION 2.. That the findings and determinations of the Board of Zoning Adjustment as set forth in Resolution B.E.A. 154-27 are true and are concurred in by the City Council SECTION 3. That the requested mone variance covering property located .i.t 144 and 148 Lyndon Street in the City of Hermosa Beach is •'hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST moirtamsameNseruguimermialPcalasimahm APPROVED AS TO FORM: PRE IDT o ' t e C'. ty Cou MAYOR of • thte City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY MANAGER • RESOLUTION NO. N. S. F A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING THE APPLICATION OF ROGER L. McGEE FOR I ZONE VARIANCE COVERING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5.821 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND 1820 ARDMORE AVENUE, AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. WHEREAS, an application for a zone variance signed by .Roger L, McGee as owner of 1ots.6, 7 and 17. Block 81, 2nd'Addition to Hermosa Beach has heretofore been filed requesting a variance to permit erection of 100 unit apartments with a portion of the garages located Censideyard property 1ines; paid garas.located more than thirty-five feet froM rear property line; and WHEREAS, said application hats been duly considered by the Board of Zoning Adjustment at a hearing thereon as provided in Zoning. Ordinance No. N. SO 154 as amended, and an opportunity given to all parties concerned to be heard with respect to said application; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment has ordered that this variance be denied for facts and reasons recited in Resolution B.Z.A, 154-24. adopted July 27, 1970, and an appeal dated July 27, 1970 was filed with the City Council by raid property owner; and WHEREAS, the City Council at its regular meeting on August i8 1970 gave all parties intereseed an opportunity to be heard with respect to said appeal, and it appered to the City .Council that the public interest would best be served by referring said application back to the Board of Zoning Adjustment for further report before making its decision final: and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment'after review of this pplication at a regular meeting 1141d on August 24, 1970, did adopt Resolution B.Z.A. 154-26, recommending that the applicant be granted this zone v riance for the following reasons: 1. The property will be graded so the garage walls .n the property line will not extend over six fent above:the adjoining property line. 2. The applicant has agreed to provide twenty additional parking spaces for guest parking, which will benefit the development and the adjoining properti 3. Allowing the garage wal1a! to extend to the sideyard property lines will allow additional turning radius, thus providing better accessibilitY to the giarages, • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSAollENCH,.CLIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : • SECTION 1. That the findings and determinations of the Board of Zoning Adjustment as set forth in Resolution B.Z.A. 1.547-24 are true and are concurred in by the City Council. SECTION 2. That the requested zone variance covering proper7:-: located at 1821 Pacific Coast Highway and 1820 Ardmore Avenue be a.:u1 the same is hereby granted, subject to the following conditions.' 1. The developer shall provide a minimum of twenty guest parking spaces, said spaces to be clearly identified and marked "Guest Parking". 2. Garage walls shall not exceed six feet above the adjoining property grade.. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of •Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CITY TREASURER'S REPORT, AUGUST 1970 FUND NUMBER . GENERAL ACCOUNT 100 200 500 600 800 900 1000 1200 1700 1800 1900 General Adv. Music & Pks. Light District Traffic Safety Parking Meters State Gas Tax County .Gas Tax Retirement Parks Recreation Sewer Maintenance -TRUST FUNDS Sewer.., Deposit Street Bond Payroll Account Refuse & Sanit.. Supt. -of Streets VPD Bond Int. & BALANCE 8/1/70 $192,078.15 100.66 22,313.45 8/1/70 • RECEIPTS CASH TRANSFERS DISBURSEMENTS WARRANTS TRANSFERS 20,650.44 513,477.98 269135.04 322.13 201.33 59749.38 831,028.56- $101,778.03 $ 305.06 1,145.16 4,687.86. 8,008.80 18,467.10 RECEIVED 1,159..24 976.20 610.12 305.06 137,442.63 PAID 9,906.29 $18.5,108.22 $ 2,099. 6,333. 1,011. 1,489. 4,029. Debt 32,137. 47,100. 54 $ 361.84 oo200.93 25 123,875.17 90 30,525.23 65 300.0o 40 4,336.26 74 .159,599.43 INACTIVE DEPOSITS 789,000.00 INTEREST RECEIVED THIS FISCAL YEAR MARY CR. fEER City Treasurer n) 267.47 124,179.61 19,000.00 200.00 66.49 143;713.57 9,906.29 8/30/70 RECAP OF ALL FUNDS General Active Other Active Total Aotive Inactive $7,327.81 $.2,461.38 6,266.46 706.81 13,015.13 4,129.65 36,407.17 62,986.60 19,359.95 28,986.60 48,346.55 789,000.00 837,346.55 194,111.24 9,906.29 BANK BALANCES Generale Sewer. Dept Street Bond Payroll Account Refuse & Sanitation Supt. of Streets VPD Bond Int & Debt Less Outsd. Chks. Inactive Total BALANCE 8/30/70 $118,654.25 405.72 239458.61 28,659.24 526,437.50 18,580.41 1,298.33 811.45 56,054.44 7749359.95 27,730.59 2,462.23 6,267.31 7,869.98 139015..13 4,129.65 2,573.78 64,048.67 1 702.12 4 ,346.55 789,000.00 837,346.55 • • DEMANDS LED WARRANTS o September 15$ 1970 Issued to: Amount 7991 Void 7992 ABCO Disposal Co Contract 13-23=299 190040 7993 Alco Chemical Co. = Supplies Park Department 8 50-330 70016 7994 Armor Elevator Co. Inco a Agreement 13-27-299 34025 7995 Barnes & Delaney . Equip. Police Units 11=00=241 476.03 7996 William J. Cavanaugh o Motorcycle Rental 11=0043 100.00 7997 Certified Office Supply m Repair & Labor typewriter 11=00=240 7.50 7998 Bonnie Lesley Clarke . Reimbursement Uniform a Allo ce Police Dept. 11-0=313 18.94 7999 County Sanitation District L.A. o Contract 13=21=248 & 13=23=248 9.68 8000 Dive N. Surf Inco = Supplies Fire Department 12`=00=302 21.00 8001 Edwards Bras. Mara t o Supplies Public Works Dept.. 13=2733002 46062 8002 Donald Finley G Agreement 11=00=243 100.000 8003 Fricke & Peters Paper Co. = Supplies Pars & Public Works Dept. 8=50=330 end 13-27=330 145,.12 8004 Clifford d0 Fowler - M er^ship Dues 12=00-420 25000 8005 Hermosa Beach C of C Agement 6-00=222 4166000 8006 Hermosa Beach Lawn -ling Club o Contract 8-50-299 100.00 8007 Glenn E. Himmel Conference Meetings Public Works Dept 13=05=215 12.00 8008 Industrial Control "System m contract 13-27-330 7.50 8009 International Business Machines Corp. = Contract 2-00=240 & 11-00-240 77©80 8010 Jacquard Systema Data Systems Study m City Manager ager 700=201 400=00 8011 Jason Inco = Supplies Park Departh, nt 8=50=330 67.54 8012 Agnes Laufer = Sel.oes Rendered Recreation Dept. 8-10=201 257.16 8013 Los Angeles Cody Aesesor d Assessment Roll. Bldg. Dept. 9=00301 11.3012 8014 Anthony Lukin = 'Registr .tion Fe Police Dept. 11=00-215 7.00 8015 Paul R. McCuistion Cly oth ig Allowance Po/ice .. Department 11-00-3/3R 1040 8016 Monroe Division Acts0 Rec. = Contract 13-95--240 3 58000 8017 Wallace C. Moore - Luncheon Expenses 71.-30=215 10.31 8018 National Assn. Recreation & Parks = Dues Conference Recreation Dept,. 8=10420 45000 8019 Joe Noble = Dinner Meeting Planni ::: Commission 7-50-215 5.50 8020 Postmaster = Postage `'-wsletter Pelt #154 6=00=22.2.2 300000 8021 Postmaster - Stamped Envelopes Public Works Dept. 13-05=-301 328065 8022 Realty Tax Service 'Co. o Contract 3299 . 25000 8023 Savin Business Machos Corp. = Agreement 6-004301 150.92 8024 South Bay Brake & Wheel = Parte & Labor Police Unit .11=00-241 48.87 8025 South= ; •,y Car Wash Contr. ,ct 11=0041 45.00 8026 South .,.y Fire Eltinguisher Co. = Contract 11=00=302 & 12-00=302 5.86 8027 Nary R. Stonier - :Petty Guth Vous Departments 80.85 8028 H. I. Tullis Co. Inc. . Service Contract 13=28=330 19..53 8029 Union Mutual Ins. Co. =.Insurance 6-50=406 1,0.6.60 8030 Wray Printing = Printing ..Expenses Planning Dept. 71030l. ; . 15083 8031 Shell Oil Co. = Contract Various Departments 1,2 2.91 8032 Jess Largs - Petty Cash Various SDepart nts 34043 8033 Perrys Plante _ Supplies Park Department CIP #5 92.31 8034 Alex Perim = Services Rendered Recreation Dept. Adv. Accts. Reim. Account #2 50.00 8035 Sterling Electric.- Supplies Recreation Dept. deco Adv. Accts. Reim. Account #2 38045 8036 Menu =1 Rivera Services Rendered Recreation Dept. Acv. Accts. Rain. Account #4 48©00 8037 Smart & Final Iris Co. - Came ng Trip Recreation Dept. Adv. Accts. Reim. Account #8p Baa 25 8038 Bob Parker 4 Services Rendered Recreation Dept. Advo Accts. Reim. Account #11 105.00 8039 Kevin Mac Connell ,- Services Rendered Recreation Adv. Accts. Reim. Account #2 1+'-.00 8040 Koebig & Koebig Inc. = Services Rendered Public Works Dept. 900 2106 #64 Herondo Street 446.76 8041 •Alsabrook Electric - Services Rendered CIP #1 416.31 8042 South Bay Plying = labor & !Male]. Police DeptCIP # 1 183.72 8 638.ea 17 • NON -AGENDA ITEMS - INFORMATION - With Agenda for September 15, 1970 Commission Vacancies - Park and Recreation Commission Report. Animal Control Report - August, 1970. MEETINGS AND OTHER EVENTS: Board of Zoning Adjustment - Monday, September 14 -- Council Chamber - 7430 pm City Council - Tuesday, September 15 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Lea • ue of California Cities G neral Membership Meeting - Thursday, September 17 Belle 'n Beau, Monterey Park Southwest AreaPlanningCouncil - Friday, September 18 Lobster House - Noon Planning Commission - Monday, September 21 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Civil. Service Commission - Tuesday, September 22 - Council Chamber - 7:30 pm Park and Recreation Commission Wednesday, September 23 - Council Chamber 8 p.m. SCAG On the Move - Thursday, September 24 - Disneyland Hotel - 8:45 a.m. South Bair Councilmen's Association - Thursday, September 24 - Sam's Cafe, Torrance - 6:30 p.m. a__provement Commission - Thursday, October 1 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. OUTDOOR ART SHOW - Pier Plaza - Sunday, October 4 - 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Planning Commission - Monday, October 5 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. City Council - Tuesday, October 6 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. - 2 3 4 5 6 ' 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. N. S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OI THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH THE CITY COUNCIL OF T} CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.. That the Director of Finance and the City Treasurer be, and are hereby authorized and directed to make a transfer of fUnds from and to the fund accounts hereinafter specified, such transfer to be entered in the proper books and records.. FROM: TO: 1970 ATTEST Parking Meter Fund Lighting District Fund $28,659.24 $23,458.61 General Fund $52417.05 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ••••••••••••••.*•••• kyonen,•••••••••6 CITY ATTORNEY S, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF I RW)SA B y ,C; .p AtlIENDING CHAPTER 5, "BEACH, BOATS AND M&UNICIPA:, PIER', OF TEE I' UNICIP&L COD OF THE CITY OF ' H E RMOSA l + iAC1 BY REVTSIRG SIi C IOO 5-10, yi:?'#;.4 3P:" 1 NG IIr,>a,zs„ ETC. ON BEACH'. THE CITY COU yCX ., OF Tpn CITY OP Iu S SAEi :,sl'', ChLI F.' iNIilA, DOES ORDAIN AS ;-?OLLOi*2S SECT/ONL. That 4 apt ° 5, ,1(y, ;1,p, BAxu ; : and Irsu'n wipa 'Kee of the Municipal Code of the City of I 'e s=it: zia B Bach, Sec A.cZ? 5x.10, . "Throwing Balla, etc. on Beach", ch", be amended two :read as follows "Section -10- `a °I a2.M. "a k2A'. ,fie.. ` a ". z...: 1a 1f eal I6� pe3' on shall cao'd„b hat, toF:m , thxo7,4 kick ,'f" a. any ball, tube, boomerang, flying saucer, or any s..}'„il ;r object, 4?': use any volleyball or cithter at i tic equipment, o r cc nP ucaor pa =t,' cipa;te in any sport o7: game at any l laue'd upon or -over t R 4N au r: 49.'3.:`;;' .ode of ai provided therefor. NO pervon shall conduct t: ow participate in any c1aj;,ad throwing, blanket throwing, or any sport thelt co tatitute . a hasard to any rs on the beach. NO sport co throwing of kr issS 1 s of any : ; . :I : hail he permitted upon the Strand w . ,k Amy a Err,. i ria t . .i;. prohibition a ro a not pply to ,R �y activity which �'.i p 1'.}: t of a ilupervi ::yd spm rt;;.i ovo.'e t or rec .• aat on au+i` ivi tfa" of he City, nor t': my activity expa: e'ss ly approved by the Park and RCac„ eat.tozr Commison or the City Coo.nci1. SECTION a. This oJrrilirdolco shall take effect t':3?ts"ty <.r 0 daft; .r thedate of a t.:$ adopts c.x eSEC*FIO i 3. the City C erk shall certify to '€l`$.{r adon ion of this ordinance, and shall prior to the expiration of gifteen days 4,rca the adoption thereof cause the *male too he published it 4;° : uJ a:st once in the Hermosa Bench Review, aR weekly newspa er of generalC'. `.?"C. : 3 ion , 3tibli hEc and circulated in the C? ty of He 'moza Bench. PASSED AFPROVED and ADOPTED ''this ATTESTT .+",.3':' RUVED AS O 11701;1U ii%1kFF-6 71; r: CTI" .;:7in MAYOR of the CSmay of Hermosa B`..,,..,a,.ach� ,. C7�..M1...,yM."'.fo ft...i.., a exT L =fit' :TT).,ra 'Y First Dei. RESOLUTION NO, N S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPLICATION OF HAROLD MARGRAVE FOR A ZONE VARIANCE COVERING PROPERTY LOCATED AT /44 AND 148 LYNDON STREET, AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. WHEREAS, en application for a zone variance signed by Harold Margrave has heretofore Leen filed requesting a variance. t permit erection of tWO four -unit apartment houses, one on each lot, in lieu of maximum allowable of two units per lot on property described • as Lots 9 and 10, Block 42, Firat Addition to Hermosa Beach; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment duly considered said application at a hearing thereon as provided in Zoning Ordinance No, N- S. 154, d5 amended, and an opportunity was given to all parties concerned to be heard with respect to said application? and WHEREAS, the Board of. Zoning Adjustment did -recommend that said variance begranted for facts and reasons recited in Resolution B.Z.A. 154-20, adopted June 8, 1970, and an appeal dated June 10, 1970 was received from an adjacent property owner and filed -with the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council at Public_hearings held on July 7, July 21 and August 4, 1970 did give all interested parties an opportunie to be heard with respect to said. appeal; and WHEREAS, a substantial number of xesidents adjoining the property for which the exception to Zoning Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended,was requested has objected thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the public interest would best be served by referring said application back to the Board of Zoning Adjustment for further report before making it decision final and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment after review of this application at a regular meeting held on August 24, 1970, did adopt Resolution B.Z.A. 154-27, recommending that the. applicant be denied the zone variance for the following re sons: 1. The Planning Ccxnrnission has determined that a general study of the area is needed and the proposed development might not be compatible to the future growth of the area, l 2. The Beard of Zoning Adjustment in granting this variance acted in haste without . the full knowledge of the pending improvements planned for the area and the intent of the zoning ordinance, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSI BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. That it now appears that it is the desire and intent of the application to use said property for uses which in the judgment of the City Council would be materially detrimental to the public welfare and to the property of other persons located in the vicinity, and in conflict with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. SECTION 2. That the findings and determinations of the Board of Zoning Adjustment as tet forth in Reso .cation B.Z.A. 154-27 are true and are concurred in by the City Council. SECTION 3. That the requested cone variance covering property located at 144 and 148 Lyndon Street in the City of Hermosa Beach is'hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST t APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1 ss Y of i ty'' Ce vx T n MAYOR of,the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION NO N. S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CALIFORNIA, GRANTING THE VARIANCE COVERING (PROPER AND 1820 ARDMORE AVENUE, F'.'_ el et, . COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, APPLICATION OF ROGER L. McGEE FOR A ZONE TY LOCATED AT 1821 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, WHEREAS, an application for a zone variance signed by Roger L., McGee as owner of Lots.66 7 and /7, Block 81, 2nd 'Addition to Hermosa Beach has heretofore been filed requesting a variance to permit erection of 100 unit: epar4 ants with a portion of the garages ,located on sideyard prepers•ty line o ' said garaOs located more than thirty-five feet front rear property line; and WHEREAS, s id appllic,.,tion has been duly considered by the Board of Zoning Adjustment at a hearing thereon as provided in Zoning ordinance No. N. SO 154, as amended, and an opportunity given to all parties concerned. to be heard with.respect to said application; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment has ordered that this variance be denied for •facts and reasons reci.tFrd in Resolution B.Z.A , 154-24, adopted July 27, 1970, and an appeal dated July 27, 1970 was filed with the City Council by said property owner; and .WHEREAS, the City Council at its regular meeting on August 18, 1970 gave all parties interested an opportunity to be heard with respect to said appeal, .and it appeared to the City .Council that the public inter° t would best be served by referring said application back to the Beard of Zoning Adjustment for further report before Making its decision final; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustment after review of this 'application at a regular meeting held on* August 24, 1970, did adopt Resolution B.Q.A. 154-26, recommending that the applicant be granted this zone variance for the following ng reasons x 1.. - - The property will be graded • so the gaarsage walls on the property line will not ext ,nd over six fapt c o 'e the adjoining property line. 2. The applicant . has agreed to provide twenty. additiona.l parking spacer for guest parking, which will benefit tbe development and the adjoining prop dr. tier. 3, Allowing the garage walle to extend to the sideyard property. lines • Will allow additional turning radivais, thus providing better accessibility to the gore es, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA.MMICH, CALIFORNIA, nor HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: v SECTION 1, That the findings and determinations of the Board of Zoning Adjustment as set forth in Resolution B.Z.A. i54-24 are true and are concurred in by the City Council. SECTION 2. That the requested zone variance covering property located at 1821 Pacific Coast Highway and 1820 Ardmore Avenue be and the same is hereby granted, subject to the following conditions. 1. The developer shall provide a minimum of twenty guest parking spaces, said spaces to be clearly identified and marked °Guest Parking °, 2. Garage walls shall not exceed six feet above the adjoining property grade, PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTESTs APPROVED AS TO FORK: PRESIDENT of the Cay Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITYCLERN CIT'l ATTORNEY RESOLUTION 7O. spm S. A RESOLUTION OF TFX CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AS CONTAINED D IN ITS RESOLUTION P.C. 154 771 DENYING A CHANGE IN LAND USE ZONE CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH CC' ERCIAL POTENTIAL TO MUL 'IPLE F" 4sMILY RESIDENTIAL, COVERING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 731 -*737739 TWENTY. -.FIRST STREET, AS PETITIONED EY JAMES FUCaZLE s WHEREAS, the City Pla nnins Commis ,on, after hearings duly held on April 6 and April 20s 1970, as prow . lay.. n as Ordinance No. K. Se 154, ma amended, d in 6'iA?'go) tion gldb'O 154-77l, adopted. April 20, 1970, anyth ;s ., l cation of James .Fucile for a change of land use zone c .ass ifi.caty: , n on Lots 20, 21 and 22, Hausa Vim Tr==ct No. l., for the facts end reasons cited in said resolution; and WE AS, pursuantto the terms and provi,sr.ions of said Zoning Ordinance said a l scant has taken his appeal from the determination and action of said Comission to the City Council and before said Council a public h wring was held on ;a y 19, 1970, at which all inter st d parties were given an opportuity to be heard with respect pct to said appeal; and WHEREAS, s .id Council did determine that the public inter at would best be served by, referring said application back to th - Planning Commission for further report before making its final decision, and did dir ct said Cosa ieeion to study not only the subject, property but also the adjacent area in relation thereto; and WHEREAS, the Planning CoMmission did review and investigate facts bearing upon the subject application and the zoning pattern. of an area lying between Twenty -First Street -and Twenty -Fourth Place and between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway meetings held on June 1 and June 15; 1970, and did ieport to the City Council at the regular meeting of said Council held on July 7, 1970, recommending that the Council sustain their action :denying the subject zone change atthis time, and said Council did again refer said request for a zone • change to the Planning Commission for further review, and directed said Commis siOn to inform all interested parties of the date •+sand time set for said review; and WHEREAS, after a review hearing held by the Planning Commission on August 18, 1970, said Commission did transmit to the City Council a report and recommendation advising no change to high density residential zoning in the subject area Pt this time and supporting Resolution P.C. 154-771, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThT CITY OF RERMOS BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the findings and conclusions of the Planning Commission are adopted by the City Council. SECTION 2. That the one change from Single -Family Residential with Commercial Potential to Multiple -Family Residential covering property located at 731-737-739 Twenty -First Street iS not in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Herona,Buch and is. hereby denied. • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this flAy of ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , 1970. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 3 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESO MEW NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CKTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOMIA, ESTABLISHING THE POLICY THAT TWEE ABSENCES FOR ANY COMMISSIONER'OR BOARD MMMBER W/THIN THE CITY IN ANY ONE CALENDAR YEAR PERIOD CREATES AU hUTOMATIC VACANCY. WHEREAS, the continuing needs4pUthe-ct.tygovernment of the City. of Hermosa Beach .7.equir the constant attention of the meMbers of t1 Bo .rds and Commissions olVthis city; and WHEREAS, th-osTficiency of city government.is hampered by the absence of pembers or Commissioners, which oftimes results in the continuance of matters brought before that Board or Commisrion; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a policy that three absences in any .one calendar year period creates an automatic vacancy on that Board or Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council realizes that there are tho4e times in hos= experience wherein absences are a necesmity, and therefore excusable; and FBEREAS, the City Council does not desire to creteti hardship and desires to retain for itself the power to reappoint the same person.. to the same Board or Commiezion if the City • Council in its sole judgment deems the absences to be excusable, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. DOESHEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That three absences of any Board member o Commissioner within any one calendar year period creates an automatic vacancy on that Board or Commission. SECTION 2. That the same meMber of a Board or Commission may be reappointed to said Board or Commission if in the sole judgment of the City Council such dbsences are deemed excusable. ATTEST; PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City .c1 Hermosa Beach, California CIF CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY. 1 2 3 4, 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 /9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. N. S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING.THE POLICY THAT NO COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY SHALL BE REAPPOINTED FOR LONGER THAN TWO vULLY•APPOINTED TERMS WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of Hermosa Beach to encourage each citizen to partake of the functions of City government; and WHEREAS, continuing membership by any member on a Board or Commission for an unreasonable length of time tends to discourage other members of the community from engaging actively in governmental functions; and WHEREAS, the City Council does desire to establish a policy that. no Commissiorer or Board member shall remain on the. same Commission or Board for a period of time lunger than two fully appointed terms, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That no member of any. Commission or Board appointed by. the City Council of this. City shall remain on the same Commission or. Board for a period of time longer than tWO. fully appointed terms. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1970 PRESIDENT of the City Cot4.1ci, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beqoh, Cali7or C TV Of FIEPMOSA BEACH INTETV -OFFICE MEMO Honorab.e•Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT. Commission and Board Absences DATE: September 15, 1970 FROMJ, B. Mirassou, -----'o . "T€SF-Kf.ro-rney In response to your questions as to the existing law concerning the amount of absences allowed on a .Comrnission or Board before a vacancy occurs, please be advised that our research indicates that only the Civil Service. Commission and the Improvement Commissionhave any rules concerning this matter. A Civil Service Commissionai can be removed from office prior to the expiration of his term by a 4/5ths vote of the City Council. The resolution creating the improvement Commission embodies the following language: 'vAny Commissioner who does not appear in person at any two consecutive meetings, or who does not appear in person at at least four out of any series of seven meetings, unless excUsed.frnm such attendance by consent of said Commission expressed by action of record on its minutes, shall thereby automatically forfeit and vacate his or her position or office as a member of said Commission." The •Commission there- upon notifies the City Council, which promptly fills such vacancy by appointment of a hew Commissioner. Other than the foregoing, 1 have found no rules concerning the occurence of a vacancy caused by absence. • Respectf4lly submitted, •A:?' i$u1!,4W641 mirat• o, City Attorney 1 2 3 IL 5 6 7 8 9 /0 U 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. N. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA, ESTADLISHING.THE POLICY THAT KO COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY SHALL BE REAPPOINTED FOR LONGER THAN TWO FULLY APPOINTED TERMS. WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of Hermosa Beach to encourage each citizen to partake of the functions of City government; and WHEREAS, continuing membership by any member on a Board or Commission for an unreasonable length of time tends to discourage other members of the community from engaging actively in governmental functions; and WHEREAS the City Council does desire to establish a policy that no Commissiover or Board member shall remain on the same Commission or Board for a period of time longer than two fully appointed terms, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY, OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l. That no member of any Commission or Board appointed by the City Council of this City shall remain on the same Commission or. Board for a period of time longer than two' fully appointed terms. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1970 PRESIDENT of the City Ckav,ncil. and MAYOR of thc City of Hermosa 13etch, Cal ori 2 3 5 6 7 a 9 10 .11 • 12 • 13 14 15' 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 •32 nEsoiusnow tO K. s. A RESOLUTION OP Tav cousc±L op THE CITY OP =WW1 'MACK, CALIF0.0AIA, .E6TABLISHM VHS POLICY THAT REE AESENCES FOR ANY coloasstanguoit sOAU) mtlera WITPIXN1i anw W MY -ONE CALMAR YEAR PERIOV CREAMS AN MIONATIC VACANetc;;.: " WI:4zMg; V40 AmtitiMavie iatie'd,S4g.ltik.attyc:sfav rausept of the City'.14.1114400ajleailh reqUire the' cOirtant atteationybd the mashers tbe Boards:44.CammigmiOas oint;hie cityrand. taffintEAS,'-tiCeefoiciai07.of Ctti tifovernment• is hampered by thnce 'of paarOieufbers or COvisfAimpioaer; which ettimes results in tile:pontiff:mance o matters brought before that Board or Commitsion; and Counc*1 desires to establish ft.p0140y. that threo absenceS'ilVany pne calendar ygar pekiod,created.:*n:. automatic vacancy on:that Besrd or Commissionl. and. 13EREAS4 thP Cit7'Council realises thatthere . . timeala haImah ex'perieace aprIences are 4 neamiNatri.aDd therefore exous ,11.44 and WREREAS, tba City Council does not desire to create a hardship and desires to retain for itself the power to reappOint the same person to the same Board or Commission i the City Council in it sole judgment deems the dbsences to be excusdbl NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HBRNOSA BEAM, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. 'That three absences of any Board member or Commissioner within any One calendar year -period creates an automatic vacancyon that Board or Commission. SECTION 2. That:the same meMber'ofa Board or Comigission may be reappointed to. said Board. or Commiasion ik in the sole judgment of the City Council suobsences are deemed excusable. 'PASSED, APPROVED end ADOM,D this PRESBEN.T of' age Cii.7 C6GE-117,—;Td--7.— MAYOR of the city of Hermosa Beach,; California ATTESTg APPROVED AS TO FORM: o'IlY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Septedber Sp 1 70 TO: Tionomble d Neuibers the City Council FROM: Office of the City Clerk SUBJECT: Termin&tion of Commission Appoi t P•.::rk ani..R9 5 e on,`..mm.� .seO to ex .. 1 /15/70: Paul Matthias (Vice C' ;ir rain) J©hu C. Dunn, Jr. (P.apr; ,se t.in tbe Ear ea qIch City ScootMIstrA.ct)* Matte haa been written to the 5nng Boar, rt5pasting their nomination - their next ne tt D Sr ptembe 21) • imefAtovie, aS6),P-iyeeW /1/ //WV ie 1611/0(7fer 5026 West Jefferson Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90016 rtione 732.0113 • HIWMOSA BEACH Anal Colltro/ Report August 1970 by track !wive animals handled' aelmals handled ,•31,g,•4 Stray de picka." up Strelf doge redemed Stray dega ozetrorod Karel o en: /Leash law violation Citatio for leash law violation 230 123 19 260 119 21 ONO C eP % .t f,,rwititgo ' -8 Nag Cis,q;..n•• ,14 1/4 Vice PrOLUe4rli Al .4.4ft.W Th4 year s Month La t ear 1.365 796 170 261 161 21 1556 843 150 48 33 340 52 28n 27 15 200 . 40 181. 19 14 133 17 , 1O 3 3 40 61 44 . 187 6 33 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1WU SOCI!STY •4:06.110:4:ed (/ Donald H. Anacreon, Operations ManaGel 85 306. MAILING ADDRESS * P.O. SOX 78245 LOS ANGELES. CALIF. 90016