Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/01/70CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNA 90254 AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING -- Tuesdav, DeceMber 10 1970 - 7:30 p.m. Council Chamber - City Hall PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 17, /970; Regular Adjourned Meeting of Noder 23, 1970. A. NATIVITY SCENE - KNIGHTS or COLUMBUS - Contribution of $100.00 from Knights of Columbus, Queen of Martyrs Council,No. 4567, Manhattan 13each., 1. NON -AGENDA MATTERS - City Council. 2 MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES: (a) Board ofgolaimAdjustment - Application for Zone Variance. Albert Wayne Unruh, 421 Monterey Boulevard - Appeal from denial by Resolution B.Z.A. 154-28, adopted Octdber 12, 19700 returned to Board of Zoning Adjustment for reevaluation, November 4, 1970; Resolution B.Z.A. 154-34, adoptedNovember 23, 1970, recommending that variance be granted. Council may by majority vote approve, modify or disapprove final recommendation. 7-z5/4 712 - (h) Board of Ap_p_9als - Sewer Connection Charge - Held over from meeting of October 6, 1970, for recommendation - Proposed ordinance amending Ordinance No. N. S. 389 - for waiver of further reading and introduction. 3. OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS:. SAG - Letter dated November 23, 1970, from Southern California Association of Governments, urging adoption of proposed resolution consenting to dissolution of Transportation Association of Southern C7difornia to effect merger of area -wide transportation planning activities. 4 COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC: (a) volleyball Tournament - Mexico City - Letter dated November 20, 1970, from Pete Field, 204-B Rosecrans Place, Manhattan Beach, requesting sponsorship of South Bay Area team. (b) Hermosa Biltmore Site - PromEed Development - Letters dated November 18, 1970, from Dar Freuhring, 21 - 21st Street and Novedber 21, 1970, from Mrs. Gordon Evans, Civic Beautification Chairman, Hermosa Garden Club, recommending use as public park. (c) LettaregfLommendatiOa- dated November 2Q, 1970, from Messrs. Hal Hogan and Lee Banks, Hogie's Old Things, 1541 West 146th Street, Gardena, coMmending Building Department and Fire Department. . REFUSE COLLECTION BILLING - Discussion requested by .councilman Wise. (-7 City Council Meeting -2- December 1, 1970 6. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK - Irrigation System, Railroad Right of Way, Pier Avenue to Second Street - Specification No. H.B. 248 - Authorizing recordation of Notice of Completion. 7. CITY PROPERTY - PROPOSED LAND TRADE - Letter dated November 17, 1970 from Neal Howard, Neal Howard Company, 1650 South Pacific Coast Highway, Redondo Beach, agent for Mamie, Inc., Ronald E. Moran. 8. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - Memorandum from City Manager requestingpolicy decision regarding assessment procedures. 9. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 68-1 - Alley between Fourth Street and Fifth Street, East of Pacific Coast Highway - Construction of pavement and drainage gutter - Modified by Resolution No. N. S. 2862, adopted June 17, 1969 - Proposed resolution of intention to order changes, approving amended plans, specifications and boundary map, amending interest amount on bonds, and setting Tuesday, January 5, 1971 for hearing of protests or objections. 10. CLAIM FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF LOSS - Letter dated November 6, 1970, from Mr. Fraser L. Kennedy, 1112 Fair Oaks Avenue, South Pasadena, regarding property located at 752 Sunset Drive, 11. CONFIDENCE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION - Ordinance No, N...$. 396, re- introduced November 17, 1970 - For waiver of further reading and adoption. 12. STREET TREE PLANTING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM - Portions of Aviation Boulevard, between Artesia Boulevard in Redondo Beach and Pacific. Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach - Agreement with City of Redondo Beach - For approval and authorization for Mayor and City Clerk to sign on behalf of City. . LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, PROJECT NO. 4050 - Portions of. Hermosa Avenue between 25th and 28th Street, and 26th Street from Hermosa Avenue to beach - Engineering Contract, Lampman and Associates - For approval and authorization of Mayor and City Clerk to sign on behalf of City. 14, MISCELLANEOUS REPORT - City Manager. 15. DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. ADJOURNMENT Hey, •thi agreement isfor street tree planting': and an irrigation Ysystem, but nowhere in the agreement is there any description at all of the "Project" we agree to help, pay for. HUH???. ippgEmEn • THIS AGREEMENT, made and 6,11tcyd Anto by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as HERMOSA BEACH, and the CITY OF REDOMDO BEACH, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to an RRDONDO REACH: 311TK. WHEREAS, portions of Aviation Boulevard between Artesia Boulevard in Redondo Beach and Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach are within tne juriedictional Utd.ta of Hegmgm Beach end Redondo Reach; and WHEREAS, Hermosa Beach aand nedondo Beach desire to improve Aviation Boulevard between Artesia Boulevard and Pacific Coast High- way, Ell of which work i horeinafter referzed to a* °ProjootH; and WHEREAS, Hermosa Beach and iledondo Beach desire that the Project be coordinated by a ningle agency and that Redondo Beach b designated ae coordinator for Project; and WHERMS, Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach desire to ehare the cost of Projnct as to the coot of work within each jurisdiction7 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties ber,ato agrei;1 as followu: 1. Redondo BuachhUaMVTa as coordinator for Project; consolidate plan's, specifications and cost estimates; award and administer the construction contract; and make all disbursements to engineers and contractors retained to complete the Project, 2, Redondo Beach ahall w.oure the written approval of Hermoea Beach: of plans, specifications and cost estimates, as they apply to the portion of Project within the jurisdiction of Hermosa •BeaCh, prior to advertising fo:r MX2, b, to award a contract for to,* construction of Project,. c, to.add to or delete fro Project during construction when such changes affect Hermosa Beach's cot for the project. L prior to acceptance of apli completed Vrojeot by the Redondo Beach City Col, 3. Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach shall provide construction in- spection within their r?sprItive jurldictionP;. 4, Hermosa Beach shall reimburse Redondo Beach for the actual cost of the portion of Project within 1Jhc jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach in the following manner a, Within thirty day after award o z construction contract for project, Hermosa Beach shall &posit with Redondo Beach the estimated construction cost of the portion of Project within the jurisdiction oi! Hermosa Beadh, as determined by contract unit prices and estimated quantities of contract items within Redondo Beach, plus 100.00 to cover estimated engineering, printing and advertising costs . Upon completion and acceptance of ProjeCt by. the City Council of Redondo Beach, the actual cost of the portion of Project within the jurisdiction of Hermosa each shall be determined and should sad actual cost be less than the above referenced deposit, the difference shall be promptly refunded to Hermosa Beach. Should said actual cost exceed the above referenced deposit, Hermosa Beach shall re- • imburse Redondo Beach the difference within thirty days of notification of the amount due. e The actual cost of the portion of Project within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach shall be the sum of the • actual cost of construction, preliminary engineering and construction gurveying and sh0.1 be determined as ° followsg The actuaL =instruction mist shall he the stun of contract unit prices multiplied by the actu4,1 quantities of contract items constructed within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach adjusted per any change orders approved by Hermosa Beach during construction. The actual (soot of preliminary engineering shall be that proportion of preliminary engineering costs expended by. Redondo Beach for preparation of, plans, specifications and' cost eztimates as the estimated construction cost within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach bears to the total estimated construction cost of Project based on the approved engineer's cost estimate. The actusl cot of construction surveying shall be that pro- portion of construction surveying costs expended by Redondo Beach as the actual construction cost within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach be to the actual construction cost of Project. 5. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed, to obligate Hermosa Beach or Redondo Beach to proceed with the construction of Project until.a contract therefor is awarded. Ghould aedondo Beach or Hermosa Beach desire to terminate this Agreement prior to such award, Hermosa Beach's reimbursement obligation to Redondo Beach shall be limited to the actual cost of preliminary engineering for the portion of Project with- in the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach as defined above, o. Neither Hermosa Beach nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or lie:bility occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Redondo Beach under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction, delegated to Redondo Beach under this agreement., It is also understood and agreed that Redondo Beach shall fully indemnify and hold Hermosa Beach harmless from any liability imposed for injury occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Redondo Beach under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to Redondo Beach under this agreement. 7 Neither Redondo Beach nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Hermosa Beach under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to Hermosa Beach under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that Hermosa Beach shall fully indemnify and hold Redondo Beach harmless from any liability imposed for injury occurring by reason of anything done or omittod to be done by Hermosa Beach under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to Hermosa Beach under 'this agreement° -2- F . IN WZTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through theirrespective officers, thereunto dulycauthorized, by Hermosa Beach° thin day of a,>m,w,s,•x.oareunulov,a,...txalev:awnlevrx,,0 cm.Aen. .1970, APPROVED AS TO FORM aly Attorney of the C ty Redondo each APPROVED AS TO FORK aty Attorney of TETZITTR--- H rmosaeach CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, a municipal ,,p=pamticdn of tha gYtatc1.5 of California Mayor o tici7i—Eity of Redondo Beach ATTEST:__ City.? Clerk of the. City of Redoikdo Beach CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California .-._--_ 'Mayor T-EsTuriir of Hermosa each ATTEST City Clerk of the dity of Hermosa Beach AGREEMENT This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , J.970, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, her inafteeferred to simply as "City", and LAIV1PMAN AND ASSOCIATES, a corporation, hereinafter " referred tosimply as "Lampfnan": WITNESSETH •This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the follow- ing facts: WHEREAS, the 1970 Los Angeles County Flood Control Bond Issue was .approved by the voters on November 3, 1970; and WHEREAS, the 'Report on th,e Control of Surface Storm Water by Storm Drains and Drainage Channels, 1970, Program" provides for the c nstruction of Project No. 4050 In various streets .Within the City; and WHEREAS, the City will be responsible for. th 6 dsign and calculations required for. Said project under the guidelines of Los.Angeles County Flood ControR•Distribt standards and manuals; and WHEREAS,. the City understands that said District will allocate engineering funds for each city,. as dictated by design re,quirements 0 and that City will .in turn contract fo.r engineering sesvices, .and WHEREAS0 in order to conduct th engineering studies necessary for Project No. 4050 and to accomplish such improvements, it is necessary to obtain the services of a qualified engineering firm to prepare the same; and WEEREAS Lampman is qualifiedto prepare the Same; and WHEREAS, the.City Cot/net/ of the City has elected to engage the Services of said Lampman upon theterras and conditions hereinafter set forth; NOVv0 THEREFORE, City and Lampman agree each with the other as 1. SERVICE: Lampman agrees to and shall render all services required by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for the design and calculations for Project No. 4050. COMPENSAT/ON: Lampman shall receive compensation from City for their services in the amount allocated to the City by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for Project No. 4056, subject.to approval by the City. Progress payments to Lampman shall be based upon percentage ofwork.completed in accordance with Los Angeles County Flood Control • requirements. 3. NOTICES: Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by United States Mail, postage prepaid, respectively, as follows: To City: b) To Lampman: The parties hereto cause this Agreement year first above written. ATTEST: City Clerk aermnawa.roatnewsranasanuovv. -2 addressed to the parties hereto City Manager City Hall 13 15 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Lampman and Associates 300 Pomona Mall West, Suite A • Pomona, California 91766 to be executed on the day and CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation By Mayor LAMP-1VMM AND ASSOCIATES, a corporation By First Draft ORDINANCE MO. N. S AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 28, "SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL" OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 28-7, SUBSECTION (C), RELATING TO THE COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CFARGE FOR NEW BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 29-7, "Sewer Connection Charge', subsection (C), of Chapter ZO0 ''Sewage and Industrial Waste Di posal" of the Municipal Code of thea City Of Hermosa Beach is hereby revised by adding thereto an exception, to read as follows: "(C) Fees shall be colleted pglor to the issuance of any building, plumbing, electrical, or applicabie pormits. EEmtion: For new buildings or structures wherein there exists no pe'rmanent electrical servic serving the prmises, the sewer connection charge may be paid at any tithe prior tofinal approval. of the Building Department; however, said building shall not be occupied until after said fee has been collected." SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, and prior to the expiration of fifteen days shall cause the same to be published at least once in the Hermosa Beach Review, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the. City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1970. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City. Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERMIN CHANGES AND MODI- FICATIONS IN THE PROCEEDINGS AND RESOLUTION OF INTENTION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 63.1 AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION OF INTEJOION NO. N. S. 2847 AND AS MODIFIED BY RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 28G2. WHEREAS, this City Council •i on the 6th day of May, 1969, adopt its Resolution of.Intention No. N. So 2847, declaring its intentionto order the construction of certain. improvements, as more fully deseribed therein an on the plans, profiles and drawings therein. referred to,.and di1 providefor the coots of said work to be ampssed against the district described in said Resolution of Intention? and WEERMASc. thie CityCouncil did, on the 17th day of June, 1969, adopt Resolutiop No.N. 0, 2062, ordering certain changes and modifications in the proposed work and pry and WHERMS, the public interest, convenienco and necessity require that certain changes an(.7 mcdifications be mde in the proceedings and in the Resolution of Intentionprior to re-adver-. ti ing for sealed. bids for constraction NON, THEREFORE,' IT IS HEREBY RESOLVgD Y•THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF HMRMOSA BEACH, CALIFCRNM, A FOLLOWS% SECTION 1, ThNt ti * amended plans, specification* and boundary map ar hereby approved for proceedings in Asse2sment District No. 68-1. The. City Clerk i hereby directed to file an me clod copy f the assessment district boundary map with the County ' ReCorder within fifteeh (15i dam. .but not later than fiftean C15) day p prior to the date of hearing -set f0,th below. SECTION 2. That the public intert, convenience and nece ity require and it is the ihtomtion of the City Counc;,,1 to order the foXIL aing chA,nges and modifiCations in -Resolution of Intention No. R. S. 2847t Section 4MAMMY OP AW%, sh I be amended. to pnovidID thm14 gmvihi boaids behring interest at the rnieisog seven pgr cgnt (7WaPer annum shall-. bo.ismod to represent u paid asi5essmenta. Th balance.of smid Section 4 mhall remain unchanged. . . . : 03CIOET The estimated cost of construction, exclusive of incidentals., $4,461039. The above proposed m ification4 the interest amount on the bonds will not result in any increas in the cost of the work. SECTME 4. NOTICE.IS HEREBY GIVEN that on th 3th.. day of , 1970 at the hour of 7:30 'Ogotiodk p.p., in the Council Chambers /mated In the Civ Center ,41iLding in the City of Hermosa Beach, California! any and all persons having any objections to the proposed changes and modifications herein proposed may appear and show cause why said changes and modifications should not -be done and carried out in accordance with this Resolution of Intention to Modify. BECTIO 5.- :Zhat the City lerk is hereby directed•te publish this Resolution in the "HERMOSA BEACH REVIEW, a newspaper printed, published and of general circulation in the City Hermosa Beach, said publication to be made net /ess than ten (10) days prior. to the date of hearing herei above not forth.. .. APPROVED 'and ADOPTED this ATTESTt. CITY CLERK- itanial..20senues•Zatsn • day of . , 1970. MAYOR OF'THE CITY OF HERMOSA ibAdii, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE O. N. S. 396 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING IT 11 MISDEMEANOR FOR ANY CITY EMPLOYEE OR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TUIS CITY TO VIOLATE THE CORFIDIUME OF AN EXECUTIVE SESSION UNLESS RELEASED TO DO SO BY A MAJORITY OF TEE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the °Brown Act" we, enacted to require that the deliberations of the governlng bodies of local governmental entities take place at miblic moetinga for the purpose of protecting the right, of the public to. remain informed.regarding their conduct of thv peopi business2 and WHERZAS, @aid Brown act specifically perigits among other the closed executive sessions, kteld during oithor a regular meeting oftho City Council or a special meeting for uhich due notice bag been given, mhen said executive session is held to consider 4Jotters blfecting the national security, or affectim the appointnent& aMployMent or dismis ol of a public officer or mployee, r to hear c laints or charges brought against such Offic r or employee by &moth r pUblic officer person, or employee unless such officer r amployee raquyets a public hearing; and WHEREAS, said executive session may exclude from any such meeting, during tho examination of a witneso, An7 or al/ other witnesses in the matter being investigated by the legislative body; and WHERFL in order to provide a fair and just xpproach and equitable and reasonable security for public officials and employes in the retention of their respective positions it beh.f&ves public bodies to. honor the appirit of the act on all occasions, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTIO I. That it sh 11 be a misdenenor for any Ilio official or employee or City Coumilman to violato the confidellqo of an exeoUtive sion unless raeased to do so by a majority of oaid council. PASSED, hPPROV310 and ADOPTED this PRIMER of theCityCounaT7-ind NAYO R of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO P -ORM: • CITY ATTORNEY 2 5 6 7- 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RES0LC7TIR NO. N. S R RESOLUTION OF TEN CITY COUNCIL CIL OO THE CITY OF HERNOSA BEACH,„ CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO 2`'H' DISSOLUTION O' THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF S UTMERN CALIFORNIA. WS@7SSR.rfr,s p the kr ea Coordinfiting Committee f the Trann- portion Association of Southern CalifoTn n, by res: r1.uti :n *pled on February 10, 1970, and th15 Gt l kcal h fgen gy. ©f tho South mss California AEt soci.ation of Governments, encs, by rasOlutiOn adopted d February 1S, 1970, have recommended the c larificAtiar and simpli- fication fication of the area -wide trasps rta tic a plamaing a eioet a the six -county region iox er c paEiEgifi ' Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino o an '. enturca Counties; tnd the Area Coordinating.Camaittee of TASC be vuporscded i'. :the General Asas u'ib1y of SCAG and that doe citica that tr r, -:t t 8i io members of SCAG be.permitted to participate in the ,STA5W4 AaseMbly of SCA on x111 tranuportation ratters and WHEREAS, the State Cif California, through the Business and Transportation Agency, and the Southern California Association of Governments have= to n.ter d into a Mmorandqn of Understanding dated October 9, 1970, .providing for the .continuance of the crew hensive transportation planning anctivitieo for the Southern California are ,: by the Southern California Association of Govern- ments upon the dissolution of TASC by action of at least one-half of its e d• "-CC,luS`i$Y• .oT oanGa a; no-Aul1$E of. :.4; o n-Cittes, NOW, THEREFORE, ,, THE CXTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0P F 'MPSArE C.19 CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AO P Yagpf SECTION L To consent ent to the dissolution of the TIMM' port pti&n Association of Southern California and to the co atinhsance of comprehensive �exee wide traxnsportation planning for the six - county region enc smp amsiing I peri 1, Los Angeles, Ori:°ango, Riverside, San Bor ons i.no and Ventura Counties by the Southern California Association on ofi' cocv,:rrca!au exato <, 4 ee O ee ti 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7L1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 SECTION.2„ That the City Clerk ahall certify:to the adoption ot-thie reaplutionl 1970. PASSEDD hgt3ROVER and IMMO th • , , 11WHITTErary CotraairaIria FAYOR o0 t City .f Nemaosm Beach° California APPROVED AaVO:P04114 . . ' ern CLmizut anw AT. 00 . . , MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ADJOURNED 1..3ETING of the City Council of the City of Hermosa .leach, California, held in the Lt. Clinton Anderson Memorial Hall, Police Department, on Monday, November 23, 3973, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen Ago, Valdes, Valentine, Wise, Mayor Thelen, Absent: None PERSONNELATTi:RS - City Attorney Mirassou requested instruction from the Council regarding a personnel matter, and it was agreed to clear this item prior to taking up the scheduled agenda. ACTION - to adjourn to an executive session to discuss a personnel matter. Motion by Mayor Thelen - Second by Councilman Valentine. So ordered. The meeting was adjourned to an executive session at 7:10 p.m., and reconvened by Mayor Thelen at 7:45 p.m. TRI -CITY MUNICIPAL. DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM - Jacquard System's Computer Software Development, 804 Manhattan Avenue, Manhattan :each. DISCUSSION - City Manager McDaniel outlined the background of this proposal, stating that the City Managers of Manhattan 33each and 31 .Segundo had joined with him in May of 1970, with theapproval of each City Council, to consider the use of a -cooperative computer system and contracted with Jacquard Systems to complete a study to determine the feasibility of several alternate systems. This study was transmitted to the Council at the meeting. of September 15, 1970, including a short separate summary and the main volume of the study for review and future discussion. It was also pointed out that since that 'time the City councils of Manhattan Beach and El Segundo had acted to approve the feasibility study and authorize an agreement establishing the South Day Cities Data Systems Joint Powers, Authority. Present to provide any additional information which the Council might desire was Mr. Ed Bolton, President of Jacquard Systems, and at the 'request of Mayor Thelen the City Manager quoted the cost factors involved to insure the maximum achievement. of Objectives, including the present system costs and the cost displaceable by the computer system as it, involved manpower, equipment and contract payments. He stated that the system was presently being considered for application. to refuse collection. billing, payroll, accounting, and. Police Department statistics, and that an initial investment of $7,000 would be required for the first seven. months while the system was being established, with an operational cost of $1,500 par month thereafter. Mr. aolton informed the Council that the proposed system did not require city personnel to do any of the programming, and that the cities taking part in the joint powers agreement would establish the financial obligations of each city with regard to site preparation, hardware and personnel. Following a question and answer period, City Manager McDaniel stated that considerations in favor of this City joining the proposed joint powers data processing system included the use of updated equipment rather than the single obsolete bookkeeping machine now in use; lessening of the rising annual wage sp3:ral; the opportunity to utilize the expertise of all of the participating Finance Directors; speed, comprehensiveness and flexibility of required reports, with, a better work product as the result; growth capability where needed; a. dramatic levellingof peak word load cycles caused by budget, quarterly financial reports, payroll, demands and warrants and billing; and a system not so subject to critical problems caused by the departure of certain personnel. Council discussion followed, Mayor Thelen stating that he did not doubt that systems like this were of value, but;that because this City is now in the process of recruiting a new City Manager, and this would undoubtedly require several months, he did not think it would-be fair to enter into this agreement before the new man was given an opportunity to study the proposal and make his recommendation. -1- Minutes 11/23/70 l Tri -City unicipal Data Processing System (Continued) Councilman Wise stated that he was impressed by the proposed system and felt that this was the way to go eventually, but that he also felt that due to the fact that this City was in the midst of a financial dry period it would be Wiser not to make a commitment for the expenditure of additional funds at this time, but to wait until this City was inan financial position to do so Councilman Valdes expressed the opinion that the value of the proposed change should be considered not so much as a. saving of personnel time and wages, but as a feasible method* to achieve a swifter and more efficient system to handle ever-increasing municipal needs and services. He added that the critical point as far as he was concerned was the length of time that might be required to. recruit and hire a new City Manager and the fact that he would need enough time to review both the Present and the -proposed systems in • order to comment effectively, which could possibly take until next March or longer. He wondered if the other cities should be kept waiting that long for a final decision. Councilman Valentine favored the proposed system, but tended to agree that it might take months before the new -City Manager could get around to making recommendations on this matter it was his feeling therefore, that in fairness to the other cities involved the Council should make a definite statement of "yes" or "no" at this time, rather. than "maybe". Councilman Digo said he thought that Manhattan 3each and El Segundo would go into this system whether or not this City joined with them, and that HerMosa each had already contributed funds toward the feasibility studywhich was used by each City. He added that he under- stood that it would be possible to join in this system at any time in the future, and that since this City had gone into the original study with a certain amount of good faith, he did not think a flat "no" should be the answer at this time. PROPOSED ACTION - to defer any action on theproposed*data processing system until such time as the Council can evaluate the matter with the new City Manager. Motion by Councilman Wise - Died for lack of Second. FURTHER PROPOSED ACTION - to processing system due to the this time. hold off action on the proposed data fact that we are not ready to move on it at Motion by Councilman Big° - Second, by Councilman Wise. Failed to Pass. Ayes: Councilmen Eigo, Wise. Noes: Councilmen Valdes, Valentine, Mayor Thelen. Absent: None ACTION - to table the proposed joint powers data processing system after a new City Manager has been hired and has had an opportunity reevaluate its feasibility, and to instruct the City Manager to so the City Managers of the Cities of Manhattan Beach and El Segundo. Notion by Councilman Valdes - Second by Councilman Valentine.. Carried. Ayes: Councilmen nigo, Wise, Mayor Thelen. Noes: Councilmen Valdes, Valentine. Absent: None until to inform PEFUS3 COLLECTION BILLING - Councilman Wise informed the Council that he had received several objections to the fact that residents who had paid a service charge of $l8..30 in advance for one year's service in order to take advantage of the $2.00 saving had now been charged an additional one dollar due to the rise of cost, adding that these citizens felt that this was a breach of contract. Due to the fact that a non -agenda matter could not be acted upon at a regular adjourned meeting-, it was agreed to place this item on the agendafor the next regular meeting. ADJOURNMENT - On the motion of Councilman valentine, seconded by Councilman Valdes, this meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. to the next regular meeting, to be held on Tuesday, December 1, 1970, in the Council Chamber, City Hall, at 7:30 p.m. -2- Minutes 11/23/70 November 24, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Ronald S. Bergman, Assistant to City Manager SUBJECT: Refuse Charges Gentlemen: As you requested, we have reviewed the billing procedures and report the following: We allow citizens to pay refuse charges in advance and receive 10% discount; thus for singles at the old rate of $5.0t/quarter, an $18.00 payment equaled $20.00 of credit and for duplexes at $9.00/quarter, a $32.40 payment equaled a $36.00 credit. In August, the City Council raised the refuse and sanitation rates to reflect the higher cost of providing the increased service under our new contract. These new rates are $6„00/quarter for singles ($24.00Arear) and. $12.50/quarter for duplexes ($50.00/year). Now, here's the problem! Upon initial payment of the annual advance amount, an account is credited with the corresponding payment plus the discount; thereafter the quarterly rate is subtracted at billing time. This quarter, instead of finding enough credit to cover the charge, a deficit was created due to the increase in rates. Thus each single family unit that would have been paid to January 1, 1971 was billed $1.00 (the dif- ference between the old rate of $5.00 and the new rate of $6.00). while each duplex in the same situation was billed $3.50 (the difference between $12.50 and $9.00. Next quarter, these annlal payment defects will be twice as much because of two quarterly charges at the new rate. The third quarter will also be geometric. If it is your desire to give a full year credit regardless of the rate increase and accept the notion that the receipt is an implied contract, the loss of revenue will amount to approximately $6, 000 over the year. However, at your direction we are prepared to Make the necessary computer input changes to remove the extra billing. o-s-pectfully submitted, GMA9W4' ONALD S. BER ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER REB:mm 4114. 44. 1,41°F t4,4 • BANE: Albert Unruh TO PERMT: k4/.usage of preperty at &2 Ronterey gESOLTIOM: B.Z.A. 15434 A RESOLUVOM OF THE BOARD OF NNW; ADJUSTRENTS RECONNEMDBNG CERTAili ACTOON UPON PROPERTV LOCATED AT 42i MONTEREY AVENUE, HERROSA BEACH, TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERKOSA BEACH,- CAUFORNIA. THE DOARb OF zokm ADJUSTMENTS OF fl CeTV Pt' liaMS4 BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; WHEREAS, there was Med with th6s Dow'd vr,dr the provisions of Ordinance M.S. i54, an applicntion for a variance by A[bert Wayne Unruh upon property owned by thc applicant and located at 42.1 MonLarey Olvd.E and WHEREAS, the Board of Ictning Adjusmants of the CEty of Hermosa Beach did en October iZo 1970, conduct a ptbflv ermj to cqnsider this application to convert en existing single family resident,%e with an existing one.,car garage h an R-3 zone into three units providing i-1/4 additional parking spaces 8.5 ft. w;de by 2i fta deep in lieu of the two -car garage and o parking stall that would be requfred; and WHEREAS, The bowrd of Zoning Adjustments dV,d at said duly advertised public hearing adopt Resolalvn g.Z.A. 454-28 denying Oh, applic2tlon; and WHEREAS, reconsideration of this apphas been requested by the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE BE ET RESOLVED that after reconsideration off the action taken in ResOutioa BuZ.A. 154-26 ea October l2, 4970 to deny app/ication of /Mart Wayne Unruh to convert en exAsting resieenal with a ono -car garage into three units providing wo open parkhig spaaes acv wide by 2 deep, it is the recomreondation of the Board of 7oning Adjmtments thai. the variance be eranted for the following reasons: L Additional testimony indicates that f'-te property has been used as three units for long periods of time tn tha pcst, and the owner, Hr. Unruh, would be denied the same rights as other property owners En the area gf the variance denial is upheld. 2. The granting of this variance would not adversely effect the comprehensive 6eneral Plan. 3. It has been demonsKrated that the deniai of this variance would constitute an undue hardship as Unruh mOermood In purchasing the dwelling that it was a legal 3 -unit resPdence. The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the 8*ard of Zoning Adjustments at a regular meeting held November 23, Imp by the fallowing vote: AVES: Comm. Ostermnnn, Comm. Legc,n, Chairman Fachard Wil/leme WES: None CERTEFICATiON i hereby certfy that the foregoing Resolution &1.Z.A. i54-34 was adopted by the Board of Zoning Adjustments 0 the City of Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting held o this 23rd day of November, 1970. Dated , Gene Ostermann„ Secretary Trelie7tri-Tifirii-ZIGT—reraTt 411 PUBLIC HERRING- APPEAL -jR. a.aET TNE UNRUZIAVOILREY BOUI2VARD - Pegarding BoiTrifE33174 Adjuatment den 1 of request for varrance Resolution B.Z.A. l5424, adopt;* October 20, 19/0. DISCUSS/OU -. Mayor Thelen •sited the pUblic hearing, . Unruh caae forward to stat* that be had aeen Leveed a auoiness Licen,e by this City to operate three -unit aparent otructure at his sadress, which was dated July 1, 1970. As additi nal +evidence of tha fact that his property had been purchaoca in Juns, 1970 laa an existi three -unit apartment building, Mr. Unruh read aloud lettere from former property owner James mcsineie and from former ten-ste Rudolph Lingenfeldar and Robert Lemaster,' stating that this property dbeen rented as a thres-unit apartment structure long ago o 1945, and aought and sold as such. He added that it was located in an R-3 Zein.,,© and that when he had been informed that this use was viol,tion he had been surprised and shocked as he would not have purchased this property if he had been aware of this fact. Mr. Unruh informed the Council that his request for a variance wa intended to provide the parking necessry for three units in the only way possible, which was to utilize the existi g one -car garage and provide two additional parking spaces, in ligu of the required two -car garage and on perking opace. It was pointed out that the previous owner had purchased this property from Councilm n Jack Wise, who had also operated this structure ,,. a three -unit rentil, and Councilmsn Wise verified this fact, stating that he in turn had purchased it as a three -unit structure. Councilman Wise added that due to this f4ct he had been advised by the City Attorney that he could not vote on this atter, but that he could enter the di cussion. Mr. Wise stated that he recognized that there was a hardship involved, and that it had ben verified that Mr. Unruh had purchased thil property without knowledge of the buyer's right to a Report of Residential Building Records, for which the realtor was at fault. Mr. Wise also reported that fir. Unruh had spent a considerable amount of money in improving this property, but that he did not feel that the variance requested would be acceptable and would like to pre ent to mr. Unruh a proposed conversion of this property to tn R-2, Two-Pamily Residential ute, which would make it possible to find a practical solution to the parking requirement problem. Councilmen Wl.de ad MPyor Thelen agread that what ppeared to ba a mis- representation of the status sf thi property was creating a hardship for Mr. UnrUh, but felt that the serious parking problae in this City called for consideration of the affect of any decision upon the entire surrounding are as well as the parc 1 of property involved. Councilman Wise Tgain stated tet he uld like to auggeat to Mr. Unruh tht be cossider requ,Asting ;,n R-2 v,riancs from the Board of Zoning Adjustment, adding that this would convart this structure into A valuale proprty that would then conform with the zoning code. Mr. Unruh Iatad that he would folic* the advices of th4 City Attorney that he should not commit himeslf at this time, but that he would be wil/i g to have this matter sent back to the Board of Zoning Aejustment for further censideration. As no one else present wished to be heard, and it was stated that the City Council . had before it all of the material thet had been considered by the Board of zoning Adjustment, and on' letter of opposition received from Mrs. Lucile Tiefel, San Diego, California, owner of property located at 526 Manh,ttan Avenue, the hearing w4s then closed. ACTIOM - to return the reguest of Mr. Albert Wayne Unruh, 421 Monterey Boulevard, for a zone varlance on this property to the Board of Zoning Adjustment for reevaluation. Motion by Councilman Valdes - Second by Mayor Thelen. So ordered. 11/4/70 November 16, 1970 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Counci/ Hermosa Beach, California Gentlemen: The Board of Appeals at their regular meetins of November 12. 1970, did study and evaluate as requested by the City Council, the amendment of Ordinance N.S. 339, relating to sewer connection cherges it teaS the unanimous decision of the Board members to recommend to the City Council the following amendment: Section 26-7, subsection (C) of Ordinance N.S.33 be amended to add thereto subsection (C) Exceptions: For new buildings or structures wherein there is no permanent electrical service serving the premises. the sewer connection charge may be paid any time prior to final approval by the Building Department and before occupancy of said building. Respect ully4 _A- M. TrotI,*".- '- Building Ditctor BMT:mb ..rfratmaMtamn=11.r..unttecc2,..,.0...auzastrnmannzlweeilsitrralarratxmang Toft.4,1ertonsronocAls *4.6,,taar. • mu.; sills get slats CtittrefiNIA aig•E4E4.. ctv",==ftlVal25.7MTP=MIltattar=23043.11,Sii&AMDeveme." riseterebk New af tho City Cauncil tiartraBsa Desch, Callfarnla Eentltmen: Ostgbor 1, With reference to Ordinance No. 369 vacantly adopt:74 and which provifts for $ sower coanectIon chergt for all now construction, It has PM02 Nfampht to the attention of the writer that Section 26-7, auks 'Om 00 which states the .following, "Foes shall ba collected prior to t Issuance of any bullcling„ ing, vlectrical, or epplicablo permits", is ping to croat am undue hardship on the' &Alder OT OMV•00p5r of ths 1 ren•clexe As on *A IC, we presently hove e prefolad 16$ unit Gpartmat In pine4 chock. The sewer connection fee wilutSoanunt to $14,400.00. aornel/y, thaluill,r or Dayoloper Is dien cif funds at .the beginning stages of a 4,i4Apolcopmaint due to the 1.Cat tkat.-er.lot enpand Owls for load, building plans, plan chock Ond hultdit parmit fan onti cony thor imaidantals.trIs unable • Sq Oft salts from the Wan agency until he hes coltplated a portion of iftwoOopmmt, . Cr tw444 be my racomendation that Section 26-7, subsection CO of (*climate 134. 309 he asoarded to add thavate Akscation (C) 'option: For mow buildingo or strOcturas tithoreln t is no parmenarist eimtrical service serving tho premises, ths• scznr connection charge noy ho paid ony tine prioxr to flool awovai ky as Building ftpartmant before fac4MWW4y of said building, prOvided that If the ft $ Is not paid within pas yea? from the date of Issuance of tha building permit, there shall tAgtor.v**146tienki ohms tk MX par opmth hosed an tha rovired foe." Or wIditi ross131% fee mold; ba 0 -aid as originaily statati in okitali- 0 tine ths tea tosid bo eielmel and would not create fiWiWiilp. Ms* dta Ouildloa ftpertnont mvutd t 49 able to withold eumaction of ate gas sod electrical cervice as existing buildings which :KWH Aready have such service In operation, end this could create 0 itoction probt 410 *rot Draft ORDIWANCE NO. N. So AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 28, "SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL" OF. THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 28-7, SUBSECTION (C), RELATING TO THE COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION' CFARGE FOR NEW BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That Sectilm N-7, "Sewer Connection Charge", subsection (C), of Chapter 2B, Sellluge and Indumtrial Waste Disposal" of the municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach is hereby revised by adding thereto an exception, to read as follows: e'(C) Fees ohall be collet o-4 prior to tea issuance of Any building, plumbing, electrical, or applicable pommits. ExCe_RTI.oa: For new buildings or structures wherein there =iota no permanent el ctrica service serving the premises, the sewer co nection charge may be Paid at any time prior to final approval of the'Building Department; however, said building shall not be occupied until after said fee has been collected.' SECTION 2 That this ordinance Shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinancC, and prior to the expiration of fifteen days shall:cause the same to be published at least once in the Hermosa Beach Review, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1970. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY,ATTORMEY pilMitiMBEE Yfilr • CAR-INVIMA ASTOCIATIO Of GOVilinKkelERM MC-41.MPoi •COOMATION FOR NECOAL MOMEK 11,81 (130 F MIMI • 51,cial 41111, MDS NAZI1.6 • CALEICIaNAA • sits37 • rafiNtil-farr. 1970 Myer Thelan: Subject: Pa r aT Transportation ant Plmning ities of TASC awl SCAG In IS44 ths Transp rtlAtion Amociatice o Southern California consisting of Cities and Cminties withinU f Los Angeles, Ventura„ Orange, Siv, Dernardino, Rivarsilde and Iperied Counties was foraed. DISC was siirard to ,i•At the rewiromants Of Section /34, Title 23 of the United StatAs Code that each urban mica cstOlish a continuams comprehensive trans- portation planning process as c prgrmisitc t eligibility for Federal tr.ns- povtatiou funtls. Tits athero Californigi Awmiation af Govern -ants was fond in 1965 far tha pamoso of vtmAylog an4 eavtOopinl racamandations for actipn o all metal pro4leco within th* Mx-comaty araa. • CAP tho mrs it has lmcum appaivnt that area -wick transportation lazglea crmld W greaatty improved P4y cargim tba transportation planning egtivitio2 of TAN pith Wm of nn. • En FsbrearyQ IWO, bfAh MSC LW SCR, adaAed resolutions expressing their intentien carlrehansive trEhspertaion plaoaing process for the Somemra Califoruia region into SCAO. ftteAer 92 1970 Reaorandum of UnderstaWing .s mated by the Stato of California and mu wproving the warp, a? ttm aren-mide transportation planning activiitioso the worger t effective opn 0.2 ditsolution of TASC In er r to owlets EaVY0 It will ts WaktFoL-i f at least -a • mOority of Oa warping bodies of ft& of thQ Miss arA Counties who are eff TAS C to adopt a resolutlea consenting t tri dissolution of TASC. A draft of web a rasolutiofi is enclosed for your consideration and action. • Mon the merger of the transporUtion planning offort'is complete, the Executive Board of TASC will become the Comprttensivb Transportation Planning Committee of SCAG. This committee will continue to represent each city's and county's transportation interests ragardless of whether a .city or county is, . has boon, or reins a Mbar of SCA G and/or TASC. (Ste Section II, Paragraph Bo Item Mo. 1, in the Havorandum of Understanding). SCAG .y enlarge the com- mittee up to a !MOW= of twenty members. It i intended that additional MAyor Thelon Hove, over 23, 1970 members (elected officials) will be added to provide experience in all modes of transportation including airports, railroads and harbors. The Los Angeles Regional Transportation Study (LARTS) will continue its planning studies under the policy guidance of $CAG through the QOW Comprehensive Transportation Plan- ning Committee. This should insure coordinated and effective planning for regional transportation in the SoOthern California area. We urge your early consideration of this matter -and your pot action on the adoption of a resolution consenting to the dissolution of TASC. When the resolution is adopted, please send a certified copy to: At chs. Southern California Association oi° Governments 1111 West Sixth Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Attention: W. T. Cha r.r , Director Transportation -Planning Sincerely, ct virts President of Southe California Association of Gone' ..,.. rets ,41....S5e Jose gr-Telie ,/f Transportation Association of Southern Cal i forni a 1' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. N.'S. A RESOLUTION OF THX CITY COUNCIL OF THE -CITY t' OF HER `OSA BEACH0. CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO TEE DISSOLUTION OF TM TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, they Aroa Cr, ordinnting Cite of the Trans- portion Association of Southern California, y resolution adopted on Febru. pry 18, 1970, and the Gen ral M.& My. of the Southern California Association of a ov 3rnments, by ro5ution adopted o February Le, 1970, have recommended the oia rifi :.:tion and simpli- fication of the area -wide transportation planning process within the six -county region encompassing 1'mperriai, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventur < Counties; and WHZREAS, the resolutions red that . the .duties of the Area Coordinating'Committee of dA6 C 4Aperseded by the General Ameembly of SCAG and that those cities that are,.not sao me abers of SCG be permitted to participate in thor 1 1�,€ n€ biyf of SCA on all transportation matters;.and WHEREAS, the State of California, through the Business and Transportation Agency, and the Southern California Association of Governments have entered int a MemorandUn of Understanding ing dated October 9, 1970, providing for the continuance of the compre- hensive e- hensive transportation plai i.nq activities for the Southern California area by the Southern California Association of Govern- ments o cern-ments upon the dissolution of TA SC. by action of at least one-half of its s€se err-Counti oe nnd oaxe. — eaf of its e Cit>ee, NOW, �THEREFO3p moo, BEACH, :1 CITY COUNCIL TR. CITY OF REG4z'�. OS6 b+L'i4�fi+`.a hH, CALIC"O�Ci IA, DOES • HEREBY RES .eVE AS FOLLOWSti ECIC 1a. (M consent to the dissolution of the Trans- portation Association of Southern errn California and to the contina z¢,aosn of comprehensive area -wide transportation planning for the six - county region encompassing Imperial,. Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties by the Southern California Association of Governments. A 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 SECT/ON 2. that the City Clerk shall c e tify to than adoption. of ` hia. aye OlUt on l PASSEDD APPROVED and WAVED this 1970. FEWIDOT of the C ; ty uno ilAYOR of the City APPROVED AS PO PORK: f Hermosa ...� MTV CER A and mach,' California City of Hermosa;... gch Civic Center Hermosa Beach C l i f . Office :► f the xyor Pete Field 204 Rosecrans Place ,Man. Reh. , Ca. 90266 i November 20, 1970 De .r Mr. Mayor first I would like to intToduce myself. My name is Pete field, I have live 3 in Manhattan each for 6 y, are and I am a volleyball player. I ha y.=14 played on the National and International level for year's and last year ny 6 m,x s team was good enough to entertain Maxie 's International Team. °ring our 5 game exhibition series,. we defeated th once and we placed 4th in the United States in c°.r NatiMnele. we ham9 z=:.=;:sf inVited to nico for their nationals, December 12-19. This will be the first U.S. Tto ever attend such an event. Thy arad ch year teams from Mexico to our nationals for development Our problem is $600.00, LL°hat we nes to att read the tournament and rapr rttt%e U.S. The $600. encludes driving dawn with two c;.reo g ,e, food, lodging ,ad in ,u ance. I am hoping to interest th City of Hermosa Reach in a nsorina o : r team. I hey e a fine group of ex -college player :, all living in our South Bay Area. *o ':leo ha a as our coach, p Mr .MooPark, Co ,yl ch of the Korea's O ys pic Womens Volleyball. Team, 1960, now living in Los Angeles. He is a professional volleyball coach and well respected throughout the world i volleyball circles. Sine ;w: w will have to leave around Decembr 9th, I would appreciate any i,yt rest in the aforemsntion proposition. I would be • x.:lo to t a 1.1 with you at any time conc, m ring the matter. d very. much like to represe>>;t the City of Hermosa Reach 4 valcoutis at . r:n Volleyball Championships in Dec '=.bar, 1970. Sincerely yours, Peke Field . A writer from We st :nsfiagasinwill be waking the trip to Mexico with th tri; p . This would also be a good source of publicity f a: Hermosa Reach. • COPY Soy'. /8, 1970 City Council of Hermosa Deach Ci Le Centg,r Isn't the city of Hermosa Bcach crowded enough? The proposv-00 condominium complex to go up on th former mit of thiltmore is id-alistically repulsive. No atter bow attractive the structure is made, the long-time residents of Hermosa, if you ask them, will com out mgainst the idea. I am twenty years of age and am a life-long resident of this city. I enjoy the single -residence nature of Hermosa Beach, even though it is becoming less practical for Bnyon ,,cept the very rich to own a house. t financial consideration should not be the major factor in this thing. A smal1 park would be delightful in that site. An pen-oir theater would be equally nice. Anything but A, group of small identicle cubicles in the Air would be preferable. It is tiln that the greed of business interests in Memos be pushed aside for considerations of aesthetics and hi- anitArinnism. l -ase j stify your d sire for this kind of deeecra tic of our mothgr strth. Thank You. /0/ Ban Fuehring 21.- 21st St. Hermosa Beach ted MRSA GARDEN GLue ctt mem loo Ptt3itio.2 rA samtci CAoE` W02 S 4 Ve do not fool your vrow6e4 25 m totter a; Pim meetm th roo endmti vs of t ,.x, master plan of Hermes. oo)hd ,M oh time and ::;naymum opntonthim plan Itwould.: see K ate of tvayers money to y for Protocol nal helpa 'd then el:, time to Weak its *emend tiono. It would seem towers of t a mtvle andmight ars not In the test interest f the oltleen of R Bgaoh. pp - t ( _ p d -a pf�o� of yom ,. f �h{�yoiveq ever @'�cWq�as�(mom de e 1.i;i �E 'i �K 9�.':% '.t3-A�zl x '... i'..s`^''." 6'�-a' �4flb°� obl'!.'aS 1/ 14 o U' r$? r s l �9L�Y"i old` o m � f the Biltmore site r se e s;h Fri;>.:::? Et would no dotter be poomitolh'toobt::i to federal ? j s for this proj: t. A pArk wo a1 not ear oars to our aero rod street, an not . odd to our overworked ever arm me It would not , ring p 11utio-r oars trash. Et would provide a 10 ly oleo<; for r;ld ana ivy,®:.-�: �:3 :�: - :to itand p ,� eyn�,3 .y our each. o Geno, i„l�s'1�ii lir. ammo mar oaikia fi f'�� ;a 7 u�'"+rs�`*. ` o here spa' �,r?sE, .r ahti1noe Q Sino ®o Go Y. } on Hyano HAL HOS,GA! 11 00 E E'S OLD TR NGS 134 WrZ64 14671-1 tiThatrr GARL)/:Nrr CALWOMMA Gt 247 PHONU 324-13325 NOV* aQt .:k. r 20p 1970 laidii Olt Nallp Urn yam Deaohp 0 254 LEE MANKS It ie with i PO ra oet that p e' mast y that -, ► �re e��a f '`er w u; +F+i t 4x` ii+1 6+oe , .r r?S',{ wL:�p at 10r b ribU'9/f ie b'/f'''iJ est �: 6 G 91 witere a MSJ9 ^' +�'r:3:i o �ln�Cd kt Gi" dy ��i�(� lib reatiPp 6sad t1 ti ar sago trap ear have to oamo ars Root, e fading ha sham d MUG. t; 1146 to vaoto the p t ,R we b o very pi . /mot and w trast Haag we re Thal ii , bri >a b nefleial b''' elmoce $:rite the city. Wo epi ®.Fp 9®iolly to ;, , ,,oar thanks to y :: r b r tiding t -x d fire dap to for fir e- o r .t i on end :ape *ore I ate in Remain > hp vad If oue ie tie ®ave will tA.,;, contacting yea re mar 1;::tim,« Our gamt� .; ,� Lice .:.:: permit 9?ihas ;+� ala_ ie far the r gyear. Thank y,; »; :.'ala f` " pie ray; ant stay tm , € mo e. ,1" •�.. ke1y y rep ROG S OLD TA 05# Lea Be • • November 24, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Irrigation System, Railroad Area—Acceptance Gentlemen: At the last meeting the City Engineer's recommendation for acceptance of this job, which has now been completed, was held over for a report on the question of whether or not an extension of time had been granted or penalties had been charged. As noted in the attached copy of a letter from our City Engineer, a fifteen day extension of time was granted, due to difficulties in obtaining materials and in securing necessary electrical subcontracting for controller connection. The work was completed within the extended period and therefore no penalty charge was assessed. There naturally has been concern from many directions, including mine, over the long delays in this job which were caused by the failure of Santa Fe legal officials to approve the necessary access rights for many months. As a consequence of this delay, when the approval finally came through, we renegotiated the contract in order to account for changes in costs and we also altered some of the work in accordance with changes in design that we had found desirable in the meantime, as well a s to eliminate the work adjacent to Pier Avenue which city forces had gone ahead and accomplished. The entire job has therefore been beset with complications and delays, not of our making, and we feel that the reason- able thing to do is simply approve the completion and be done with it. The watering and leaching process is now underway, and it is anticipated that pla:atting can probably begin in about three months. Respectfully submitted, 'WESL,:. C. MC DANIEL City Manager WCM:MM 44, \ cr.r-.• r 1:141' -0,i1.„9,4.071' • 4 egitaa.-w--- e.0.- fr .441A' cf ANDSCAPE, AND 1.374 4544,,,,, 4 'VagaligiaraVITIAMMMUMEMMEWSWIMMEM / 720 LAUREL AVENUE MANHATTAN etithe • OotoWr 96p 18T0 My of Borman% Reran% Olvte OeRUp Mamawila Boaeho 0611g0 embjeote ftrmome atlegb VAlivesti Aleitt of Peg -Atteationt Faro Glen Esummla Dolw airy .ti lentiom I would like to wevevt an addlUemeti tiftom mottmg tart for the lastalitiap a 0* Irrigmtion atem on ,41114 GIOW tined prej,set. La gutTs aro awalloy wo bid thia job approximately a year ags umd diamot knam eatetly wham we wmulld get the aotlee tv pooleeed elth tho gobt Vtam wo did get tile atthoritx to cemmemckeb ge men la th* middle of a very hem ent ulo of wmok0 * k alm maffsetspea ,31 a cim %mem delay on aum ordor of t—. controller ,r. -,e' mate eamtrel valy 0 'Under thiuse oimp..atummte tem teval that I'm will mrderAcm4 w wo essd tko warm tivea We do twee a am, =ita, Om job 20V and tea %vat tho worft in yavvoteeing oatimfmetorglgo atmeerely yourto 7,7 ,Z4V;A•te r,t1:.irro* • Prank H. rasInetr,le QWAW Parkviev SprInkleab Om. NA= 24;vt,h- pezvIte Ognivae SC, Han Ptagimptem tarekompa & eff02416t nrNt Elltitkd AMOTAVI) igillaa it0A1';eitg. Ca116=kb eal2.4xcni .?xttuirama a Tim C IS No. 346 Gentl.mgwo FAst.mtucte ced yew tieine Oseii0Ke ftge aglei Witeaatin an, 4 a URA fez, ymar oraMet ED Fie. 244 korRanstMa Bgetteditg Spbta GS RaniMed Mtc42-etl-,001, Catiggkg0 tire gintiM cab) friaidagt daym gmatgd. teFelgetkom diae tfra eaitinet untatal,v, tstrasgh ifirsottor a, vno, 4latry cuty yovea 6 G. Z. 111.MMIt 11) ' Aso • November 24, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: City Property --Neal Howard Letter Gentlemen: The attached letter from Neal Howard probably deserves some addi- tional explanation. In connection with the second phase of Herondo. Street, where -we are now returning to the concept of swinging. the alignment to the north which would encroach to some degree into the properties on the south side of First Street, the right-of-way would also of necessity include some taking of property at the northeast corner of 190th Street and Pacific Coast Highway, occupied by the Oldsmobile agency. This agency is located primarily on property owned by Mr. Moran, as well as the corner parcel owned by the City of Redondo Beach and used on a lease basis. In order to avoid paying poasiblO. severance -damages for business loss, as well es compensation for property taken, it might very well be more economical to simply replace land taken with new land s� that the business could continue. The only cost would be that of the land value plus relocation or reconsideration of relatively modestly priced structures. The logical property upon which to base such an exchange would be a portion of those lots on First Street east of Pacific Coast Highway which we have tentatively itemized for sale, and which directly abut the automotive agency property:. Mr. Howard's suggestion., then, is that we defer sale of this property until the question of this Herondo alignment is determined, which ob- viously will be within the next six months. Property which our city put into the transaction would be used as a credit against our financial participation in the Herondo project, so that it would therefore not make any financial difference. We have not yet received the appraisals from the Board of Realtors so an instant decision is not needed. However, the consideration is well justified and should be given serious consideration. WCM:mm Enclosure Respectfully submitted, WESLEY G. MC DANIEL • City Manager • • FI 0-0364 e tflO SOUTH PACIFIC COPAsarGI4tWe REDONDO sEACti. CALIFORNIA 90277 Ame° ,t,ge,s,4 6 44,1togame November 17, 1970 S bjeot: Lots 6,0,9 840 Trafton Heights Lots 124 h 140 Tract No 5019 McDaniels City Manager Civic Center Hermosa'Boach, California Dear Sir: Mr. Ronald Moran is willing to assizt and, wherever possiblc. expedite the development of phase two of Herondo Street but a land trade 4nvo1ving tOe subject properties is the only workable soiution. Sale of land by eminent domain would result in the loss of the Oldsmobile agency at a tenant with resultant severance Coots to Mr. M ran which co to would have to be pooled on by With rept placing cement of the land his Major concern would be re- tructures. Qinr.ov:o v6, 0 ,/ / Neal Howata agent for Mamie Inc. Ronald B. Moran oopieo to: Pramois Hopkins notrrie Dualgh • November 24, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: Sidewalk Construction Program Gentlemen: Evidently a slew of questions from property owners has come down on Pat Reynold's head, so we need some Council policy and guidelines. Pat°s off today, so I'll have a try at relaying them, and further discus- sion can be held Tuesday evening. 1. Question: What work needs to be done, particularly rebuilding existing (but deteriorated) curbs and drive aprons? Answer: This is a decision of the Street Superintendent (Pat), not the City Council. I've advised Pat to be conservative in his approach, requiring replacement only in obvious cases. Each property is a special consideration, and Pat has been spending considerable time ironing this out. 2. tg jststicaLi: Should I have the work done myself, or wait the sixty days and have the City do it? Will the city price be cheaper? Can I obtain a quote en the city price? If I do it, Must I pay for a permit? Discussion: This right now is the major question, also related to Question 3 below. Private contractors are being called, and are working the area on their own, and the people are price shopping. They wonder if the city "forced" price would be less, and also about the possibilities of spreading it over time (Question 3). Recommended Policies: a) Encourage that the work be done privately before the "forced" deadline arrives (to save city time, decrease our,in,volvement, promote free enterprise). b) However, require that a permit be obtained and paid for (we still have to Irnspect and spend the time, therefOre expense). • Page 2 c) Establish a policy that., should the city have to do the work, it be done either by contract or city forces, depending on the size and other circumstances; but that, if done by city forces, the cots be realistically computed, including all overhead, so as to be substantially equivalent to a private contractor. d) Refrain from quoting prices on city performance, other than to explain the policy in (c) above (to eliminate conflict and avoid later getting "boxed" on a quoted price which turns out to be wrong). 3.tale...L021i: If the city does it (or causes it to be done), what payment options do I have (i. e. --lump sum, bonds, taxes, liens, timing, etc.)? Discussion: We thought these questions wouldn't have to be answered before the second, cost determination, protest hearing. However, the people axe making this a large part of their decision on private con- tracting v. city performance, so guidelines are needed. In the suggested policies below, our intent is to be fair to the people, and yet not over- load a relatively minor cost ($100-300) with overly high administrative burdens,, Recommended Policies - a) After cost confirmation hearing, allow thirty days for lump sum payment (although State law only allows five days, city can de facto grant twenty-five more as grace). b) .That bonds not be issued (there are better and cheaper altern.atives). c) That lump sum payments be required as follows: 1„ preferably, only, no matter the amount 2. alternatively, if the Council wishes to give more latitude, on all amounts ander a certain figure: (a) First choice: $300 (b) Second choice:$200 d) In the case of (c) (2) above, then, that the Council exercise its option to allow annual installment payments (Section 5895, State Code), of the total amount, with 7% interest, over a term of: 1. First choice: 3 years 2. Second choice: 4 years 3. Third choice: 5 years Page 3 e) In the case of failure to pay, either in lump sum or, if eligible, in terra installments, that the unpaid amount be certified as a claim and lien and be collected in the next regular tax bill (rather than entered as a lien on the property to be satisfied at sale). Reasonable notice (First, 30 days; Second, an added 30 .days; then 4.:onftrm) should be given before confirmation to County Tax Collector,, Obviously, there will be questions, and we will be prepared to answer them at the meeting. Respectfully submitted, WESLEY C, MC DANIEL City Manager WCM: nm. • November 24, 1970 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Wesley C. McDaniel, City Manager SUBJECT: AD 68 -1 --Alley East of Pacific Coast Highway. Gentlemen: The contracting and bonding market has loosened up considerably and we now feel that it would be appropriate to rebid this job. Several minor changes have been made in the technical aspects of the projects in order to reduce bidder complications and solicit bidder competition, and therefore we need to go back through the initial procedures involv- ing a resolution of intention and a new protest hearing. The changes involved deletion of the parking area which was a small ancillary portion of the alley area itself, provision for allowing the contractor to pay the city for property acquisition at the end of the job rather than initially, raising the allowable interest rate to 7% as recently approved in State law, and revising the engineer's estimate to conform with current conditions. It is recommended that the attached resolution of intention be adopted. Respectfully submitted, ()/igafryte,/ WESLEY C. MC DANIEL City Manager W CM:mm Enclosure • RESOLUTION NO, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CHANGES AND MOD/- FICATIONS IN THE PROCEEDINGS AND RESOLUTION OF INTENTION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 68-1 AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTTON OF INTENTION NO. N. S. 2847 AND AS MODIFIED BY REsoLunom NO. N, S. 2862.. WHEREAS, this City Council did, on the 6th day of May, 1969, adopt its Resolutiml of Intention No. N. S. 2847, declaring its intention to order the ocnstruCtion of certain improvements, as more fully described thereAn, and on the plang, profiles and drawings therein referred to, and did provide for the costs of said woek to be aosesoad against the district de6cribed in said Resolution of Intention; and WEEMS, thi* City Council did, on the 17th day of June, 1969, adopt Resolution No. N. S. 2062, ordering certain changes and modifications in Lthe proposed work and proceedings; and MERRAG, the pub/ic interest, convenience and necessity require that certain changes and modifications b made in the proceedings and in the Resolution of Intention prior to re-adver- tiang for scaled bUs for constructim. NOW, THEREFORE, IT XS HEREIN RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF T CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAL/Kann, AS FOLLOWS% SECTION 1. Th$1t the amended plans, specIfications and boundary map are hereby approved for proceedings in Assessment istrict No. 68-1. Tlie City Clerk is hereby directed to file an amended copy of the, aosessment district boundary map with the County Recorder within fifteen (15) dtAys, but not later than fifteon (15) day a prior to the date of hearing set fc4rth below. SECTION 2. That the public interecat, convenience and fleece ty require and it is the lnteltion of the City Council to 1- 4 • • order the following ohangoe and modifications in Resolution o Intention No. Scotian 4 jgopmggitme4 phalli he amended to Mogi& thEt geriat bods bring interest at the rato of oevan par cent t'm per annum shall ba.ismued to reprecent unpaid asimmments. The balance of sad Section 4 xhall remain unchanged. : SZCTXON 3. Th 45 ostimated cost of construction, oncLusivo7 Of incidentals, is $4,461.89. The above proposed modificatio the interest amounton the bonds will not result in any increas* in the coot of the work. SECTION4 tioncE.L5 HEREBY GIVEN that on the 5th day of J1Q1sAily , 1970, at the hour of 7%30 .in the Council Chambers located in t e Civic Center Building in the City ofHermosa Beach; California, any and all persons having any objections to the proposed changes and Modifications herein proposed may appear and show cause why said changes and modifications should not be done and carried out in accordance with this Revolution of Intention to Modify. SECTION 5 That the City Clerk le hereby directed to publish this Resolution in the HERMOSA BEACH nrviEw., a newspaper printed, published and of genern1 circulation in the City of Hermosa Beach, said publication, to be made not less than ten (10) days prior to the date og hearing hereinabove net forth. ..A2PROVED and ADOPTED this day of 3970, eAdr•••WV.W.71M.1•• EMI•M:MMEd1.10, ATTEST% MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY ORC--- ksSAt. 2%1AV g 1:12 P" .t.1 P A e. ZoUrt4 PALIROCiINACLt. 71t,13•t 13E gailittberado , gapteuker Sp MO 41,.. RI. OR City Mwar Maim backed ap into the root& o Ii ted et 712 fteset. PerIZNAM JUsek meemaitated the moo a ;lefts' '4'14 clogmlft E0Ms game ef rent f the ItAy weak -cod and fellairlAg uotk. Osqpils* Itmreby mule for roldwarsemomt of tbg le PluAkiag B1111„ A. A. Eery ComaRy $423.62 Clmanin till; rre4 r, WiLem Lees of ronval imomm, 1 Toa prcrat ott4atisom to this mmt**19. vill be ',err geteh Tom van trr2,14(e, 111 Mar 111e. Et Is Pketa Mate. r .1,04 ag4 fAILU 1czei24 ORDINA'.tCE LbOh N. S<, 396 AN ORDINANCE OF TM C/TY or HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING 11' A MISDK EAFOR For ANY CITY EMPLOYEE EE OR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THIS CITY TO VIOL TE THE COCFIDnnCE OF AN EXECUTIVE SESSION UNLESS RELEASED TO 1O SO DY A MAJORITY OF TM CXTY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the °Bream<a Act" was enacted to require that the deliberations of the goverml.ng bodies of localgovernmental entities tate place at pay lic meeting* for the purpose of protecting the right of the public to remain informed regarding their conduct of the peopl; business; and ME SA @aid Bram :, Act cpecif.cally perMi.tse among other thispo closed executive sess i 'iis, tiold Bearing either m regular MZeting of tit* City Council or a special meetinly for which du : notice has been givenv When said executive session in held to consider matters affecting the national security, or affecting the appointment, eqpiOyment or a iami5eal a public officer or wmployee, or to he complaints or charges brought , shag[ such officer or employees by another public oUUiCE:r, person, or employee unless such officer or employee yeea real -mete as public hearing; and WHEREAS, said executive session may exclude from any such meeting, during the examination ;.; ritnes€, , my or all other witnesses in the matter being investitgated k the l gi alativ e body; and WHEREAS, in order to provide a fair and just approach and equitable and reasonable security for public officials and employees es in the retention of their rempoctive positions it behoove public bodies to.honor the spirit of the act on all occasions, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CXTi COUNCIL or TF CETY OF F ERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS :'*LF : SECTIOM Ie ft it shell be i sdc e a nor fox any ilio official or employee or City Councilman to violates the confidOwo of an executive session ion un.lese released to do co by a mOority of maid courtci,1 e PASSED, APPROVED and AMMO this Z+TTE S t APPROVED AS TO FORM: PP.JSIDEOT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beal h, CalifOkragil C I TY ATTORNEY /( CITE OF H EPMpO BEACH ENT a'r -- 6�# ICE 6Ni ?+oA�P.. z Wesley C,, MCD ° nisi ° City Manager steam Agreement - Improvement Portions of o i- oL ar FEF—veer-ii la Boulevard in Redondo Beach 6, Pacific Coast Highway, in HaC1180081 Beach DATE. November 20, 1970 ? frlOv 3 Rom:. Gerald P. Taylor, Cit Engineer The attached agmentent between the City of Hermosa Beach and the City of Redondo Beach is for the installation.of street trees and an irrigation system on Aviation Boulevard between Artesia oulevard and Pacific Coast Highway. The tigr: ement iradicategt that the City of Redondo Beach will administer the contract, and the Citief, win inspect the work within its own Jurisdiction. The agreement further provides that we shell pay .Redondo Beach $100 to cover estimated engineering,. printing and advertising cost.in addition to our actual construction cost. The $100 seems like a reasonable request to me. 1 have reviewed this agreement and agree with its contents. This agreement was prepared by the City Attorney of Redondo Beach, I would suggest that you have our City Attorney review also. GPT:$w Encl: • • .1141UEMENT, THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipi corporation, hereinafter referred to as HERMOSA BEACH, and the CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to ao REDODO BEACH: ItZTNE119,53 'YE: WHEREAS, portions of Aviation Boulevard between Artesia Boulevard in Redondo Beach and Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach are within the jurisdictional liNits og Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach; and WHEREAS, Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach desire to improve Aviation Boulevard between Artesia Boulevard and Pacific Coast High- viay© all o which work i2 hereinafter referred to M6 "Project"; and WHEREAS, Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach deeire that the Project be coordinated by a :angle agency and that Redondo Beach be designated ae coordinator for Project; and WHEREAS, Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach desire to share the cost of Project as to the cost of work within each jurisdiction; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties 'hereto agrea as followu:• I. Redondo Bach shell MOKVG as coordinator for Project; consolidate plans, specifications and cost estimates; award and administer the construction contract; and make all disbursements to engineers and contractors retained to complete the Project. 2 Redondo Beach, Abell secure t written approval of Heemoza Beach: a. of plans, specifications and cost estimates, au they apply to the portion of Project within the jurisdiction of Hermosa •Beach, prior to advertising for bi&. b0 to award a contract for the construction of Project. c. to add to or delete from Project during construction when such changes affect Hermosa Beach 'e cost for the project0 d. prior to acceptance of the completed Project by the Redondo Beach City Council. 3 Hermosa .Beach and Redondo Beach ghall provide construction in- spection within their respeotive jurisdictions. 4 Hermosa Beach shall reimburse Redondo Beach for the actual cost of the portion of Project within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach in the following manner: a. Within thirty daya after award of a construction contract for project, Hermosa Beach shall deposit with Redondo Beach the estimated construction cost of the portion of Project within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beadh, as determined by contract unit prices and estimated quantities of contract items within Redondo Beach, plus 100.00 to cover estimated engineering, printing and advertising costs. b. Upon completion and acceptance of Pro jest by the City Council of Redondo Beach, the actual cost of the portion. of (Project within he jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach shall be determined and should said actual cost be lees than the above referenced deposit,the difference shall be promptly refunded to Hermosa Beach.. Should said actual cost exceed. the above referenced deposit, Hermosa Beach shall re- imburse Redondo Beach the difference within thirty days of notification of the amount due. c. The actual cost of the portion. of Project within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach shall be the sum of the actual cost of construction, preliminary -engineering, and construction surveying and shall be determined as fol.lowa s The actual construction coot shall be the sum of contract unit prices multiplied by the actuel quantities of contract items constructed within the jurisdiction of Hermosa: Beach adjusted per any change c rdegm approved by Hermosa Beach during c ;n&ts:uc;tion. The actual coot of preliminary engineeeing shall he that proportion of preliminary engineering costs expended by, Redondo Beach for preparation of plans, specifications and' cost estimates as the estimated construction cost within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach bears to the total estimated contruction cost of Project based on the approved engineer's coat estimate. The actual coot of con. , t t ction surveying shall be that pro- portion of construction surveying costs expended. by Redondo Beach as the actual construction cost within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach peeve to the actual construction cost of Projector 5. nothing contained herein shall be deemed to obligate Hermosa Beach or Redondo Beach to proceed with the ' construction of Project until a contract therefor is awarded. Should Redondo Beach or Hermosa Beach desire to terminate this Agreement prior to such award, Hermosa Beach's reimbursement obligation to .Redondo Beach shall be limited to the actual cost of preliminary engineering for the portion of Project with- in the jurisdiction of Hermosa .Beach as defined above. 6.. Neither Hermosa. Beach nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Redondo Beach under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to Redondo Beach under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that Redondo Beach shall fully indemnify and hold. Hermosa Beach harmless from any liability imposed for injury occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Redondo Beach under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to Redondo Beach under this agreement. 7. Neither Redondo Beach nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done byHermosa Beach under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to Hermosa Beach under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that Hermosa Beach shall fully indemnify and hold Redondo Beach harmless from any liability imposed for injury occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Hermosa Beach under or in connection with any work, authority or jureisdietion delegated to Hermosa Beach under this agreement. . Ind WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their respective officers, thereunto duly authorized, by Hermosa Beach, th. o ma M,SW A .,,_, � ,s.� �. d , of APPROVED AS TO FORK Attorney of the of Redondo Busch APPROVED AS TO FO CITY O! REDO DO BEACH, a municipal aorpmNa.tivn of the State of California Mayor of the City of Redondo Beach ATTEST: City C . r% of . o' e. City of Redondo Beach CITY OF HERKOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California City Attorney of the City of Mayor 076:67ENTEk Hermosa Beach Hermosa a Beach ATTEST: ity Clerk o the ty of & eRm sa g • • AGREEMENT This.Agreement, made and enter -d into this day of , 1970, by. and between the.Ctty of Hermosa Beach, a smunicipal corpwation,. hereinafter referred. to simply as "City", and LAMPMAN AND ASSOCIATES, a corporation,- hereinafter referred to simply as "Lamp/ban": W I T N ES S E T H This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the follow- ing facts: WHEREAS, the 1970 Lsos•Angeles•County Flood Control Bond Issue. was .approved by the voters on November 3, 1970; and WHEREAS, the "Report on the Control of Surface Storm Water by Storm Drains and Drainage Channels, 1970, Program," provides for the construction • f Project No 4050 in VaTiOUS streets .withinthe City; and WHEREAS, the City will be spnsthle for the design and calculations required for said project under the guidelines of Los Anoeles County Flood Control District standards and manuals; and WHEREAS, the City understands that said District will allocate engineering funds for each city, as dictated by design requirements, and that City will in turn contract for engine.ering services, and WHEREAS, in order to conduct the engineering studies necessary for Project No., 4050 and to accompliSh such improvements, it is necessary to obtain the services of a qualified engirAeering film to preF::are the same; and WErMEAS, Lainpman is qualified to prepare the same; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has elected to engage the services of said 31.arnpman upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; NOW, TNEREPORE, City and Lampinan agree each with the other as follows: /3 • 1. SERVICES: Lampman agrees to and shall render all services required by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for the design and calculations for Project No. 4050. 2. COMPENSATION: Lampman shall receive compensation from City for their services in. the amount allocated to the City by the Los Angeles County Flood Control Ktistrict for Project No. 4050, subject to approval by the City. Progress payments to Lampman shall be based upon percentage of .work completed in accordar.ce with Los Angeles County Flood Control requirements. 3 NOTICES: Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by 'United States Mail, postage. prepaid, addressed •t6.the parties hereto respectively, as follows: a) T City: b) To Lampman: City Manager City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Lampman and Associates 300 Pomona Mall West, Suite A Pomona, California 91766 The parties hereto cause this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: City Clerk • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation By Mayor LAMPMAN AND ASSOCIATES, a corporation By President Clurent Matters • 0 - - - - DE 0' I S I OP ;OFDS ANL Ulig,31fiTY) ",'Si,01,2",f.,1.:2 - CITY 15AFLOEA 11/10,a 2.._ ..,, .4§....72:„ , ..:,•,,,,,-,2,1,,y,,,- ,,,.:...csc. ' Joy. otIty- Administz-ative Assiztant- nuance position EDP payroll servine Licowra t Fire More functions to Firc RDPI., Joint Cities or ether Conts.:,act enginow Drafting help Fi Chief Apz-aiptmm.:, Fire 3 platoon Feld Serrices Directo Stnff Uotmittes Police Staffing orfg*nisatio.47,, Hiig fraenle Finavaoe-,DpartEent more ohnnaq;,1.3 Post adget Vikt -Dom- tenlcvoro• X • .. .Flestfa3 I Penclina X Reftse Car Alliwanceo X, Contract onetoaal X PayoffPolic* 001.4),, X z. Balsoball yrogram X X Summer Poltee cvmtim X Z Abtorogele ova4 oatza Elan X Dead. • COMFil.2-0i2:;:. • .TaRing PP; rioe p.q.R.,ARJrgilps m'ildstanelsrd hol,.Esiag inspeo, X Bndget Diltmore X Shoreline po.sition ? 1.971 lesi, City ctioaj amber 7 Dumntoan development ' X Plfmning 5i.reatiolls X Bu oontrol X Ituth control X intergovt. Cooperation II City serviae levels X 7a,aagot Thaificd Maior Polioe DapaRtonnt tireatione X Dopto- Head statys (CS) X X vate PeneLing Ma4ar fr....AS..1QU WITCSI,L1--.1,,,,A7MaieL Five Year CIP Pie& X .;,4. .7.1`..lviau Esach Committee ReTcot X -,,,, ( to q1.4#rgroulkdYtil.Aties Repert 'It .41, Ntad to vtAshore island X NON -AGENDA ITEMS • • INFORMATION - With Agenda for December 1, 1970 Available from the Office of the Ci tv Clerk: filtx_2fRedondo Beach - Resolution No. 4936, requesting the Division of Highways of the State of California to reactivate route studies for the proposed Redondo Beach Freeway (Route 91) between Normandie Avenue and the Proposed Torrance Freeway (Route 1/107) Western Union TelealEet.jamapay - Notice of application to PUblic Utilities Commission to make certain changes in rates for intrastate service in California affecting telegraph consumers. MEETINGS AND OTHER EVENTS: THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - Thursday and Friday, November 26 and 27 OVER -THE -LINE TOURNAMENT - Saturday and Sunday, November 28 and 29 - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. - 1st Street to 3rd Street, on the Beach HAPPY TIMES COALITION BAND CONCERT - Clark Stadium, Sunday, November 29 1 p.m. "to 5 p.m. CAIL,C2Lincil - Tuesday, December 1 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Imosszmeat_g2gmigAiga - Thursday, December 3 - Council Chamber - 7:30 D.M. League of California Cities - Thursday, December 3 - Los Angeles - 6:30 p.m. PLaming_Commission - Monday, December 7 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Board of Appeals - Wednesday, December 9 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Souttl_pay Sanitation District - Wednesday, December 9 - Los Angeles -, 2 p.m. Inter-Cifa_glightugmmittee - Thursday, December 10 - Lawndale - 6:30 p.m. DEDICATION OF PAREETTES - Saturday, December 12 - 6th Street, 10 a.m.; 2nd Street, 11 a.m. yaRttilftiEamslimaLtsAt - Monday, December 14 - Conference Room -' 7:30 p.m. T1221AL91...gming_adjustment - Monday, December 14 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. City Council - Tuesday, December 15 - Council Chamber - 7:30 pm Beach Plan Committee - Thursday,, December 17 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. RECREATION FESTIVAL NIGHT - Thursday, December 17 - Pier Avenue Auditorium - 7:30 p.m. SW Area PlaulimsmIncil -' Friday, December 18 - Lobster House - Noon 2nd Annual Xmas Invitational Surf Contest - Saturday and Sunday,, December 19 and 20 Planning Commission - Monday, December 21 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. Park and Recreation Commission - Wednesday, December 23 - Council Chamber - 8 p.m. CHRISTMAS DAY - Friday, December 25 1924aaa_Council - Monday, December 28 - Conference Room - 7:30 p.m. Board of Zonin Acrustment - Monday, December 28 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. South_lai_Councilmen's Assn. - Wednesday, December 30 - Sam's Cafe, Torrance - Bring Your Wife! NEW YEAR'S DAY - Friday, January 1, 1971 Planning Commission - Monday, January 4 - Council chamber - 7:30 p.m. City Council - Tuesday, January 5 - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. November 30, 1970 TO: Wesley C. McDaniels City Manager PROM: G. E. Himmel, Civil Engineering, Associate SUBJECT: P4cceptance of Work - Specification No. BB 252, Landscaping for Gould Avenue A final inspection of the work covered by Specification No. HB 252 was made in the company of Mr. Paul Peterson of the Parks Departmenti; We found the work to be complete and satisfactory. In accordance with Division 6.01 of the specifications, I certify that Mazon's Landscaping has satisfactorily completed the work called for and described in said specifications accordida to the terms and condi- tions thereof. The total value of the work is $$8,103.00. I recommend that the City Coun cil accept the work as complete and authorize the City C.er,: to file the Notice of Completion on the c.ontract. Very truly yours, G. E„ HIMMEL Civil Engineering Associate GEH:jw DEMANDS AND WARRANTS - December 1, 1970 Issued to: Amount 8383 ABC Nursery - Supplies Contr. 8-50-330 $ 49.85 8384 ABCO Disposal Co. Contr. 13-23-299 11,439.24 8385 ALCO Chemical Co. --Supplies Contr. 8-50-330 82.35 8386 Anthonys Jewelers - Ringcutter Blades, Contr. 12-00-302 11.39 8387 Armor Elevator Elec. Co. Services Contr. 13-27-299 8388 Auto Air - Svc. to Police cars - Contr. 11-00-241 lgt:g 8389 J. T. Baker Chemical Co. - Cylinder Chg.: - Contr 11-00-227 6.54 8390 Bank of America, Lease Rental - City Hall Contr. 6-00-410 2,66667 8391 Ron Bergman - Cony. expenses - Contr. 7-25-215 4620 8392 Bio -Analysis - Svc. Police Dept. - Contr. 11-00-227 12.50 8393 Martin M. Bruce, Ph.D. - 40 copies practice tests 7-10-214 13.60 8394 W. Atlas Burpee Seed Co. - Supplies Contr. 8-50-330 60.11 8395 Calif. Peace Officers Assn. - Membership dues -Contr. 11-00-420 2000. 8396 Calif. Water Svc. - Monthly billing - Var. depts. 10466.87 8397 Certified 0Th. Supplg - Repafr typewriter - Contr. 12-00-240 9050 8398 County of LA0 Sheriffs Office - Police dept. 11-00-233 68.07 8399 Crime Prevention & Control Foundation - Contr. 11-00-214 674.00 8400 Designs Unli iced - Tank shirts for surf festival - 6-00-222.1 48.00 8401 Edw. R. Dickstein, M.D. - Roger Edgerton -Fire Dept. 7-10-201 63.00 8402 Edwards Comm. Market - Supplies. Dept. 330.1-13.27 2726 8403 Clifford D. Fowler - expenses Contr. 12-00=214 1,6 8404 General Telephone Co. - Monthbilling ly 92.90 63.55 8405 Void 8406 General Telephone Co. - Leased Lines Contr. 10-00-203 36.55 8407 Edw. Glaser & Assoc. - Professional sgc. - Contr. 7-10-201 50.00 8408 Imperial West Medical Ctr. - Professional SVCS° -, Contr. 7-10-201 317.50 8409 Imperial Service Corp. - Services - Contr. 7=10=201 80.40 8410 Industrial Control System - Mop Cloths Dept. 13-27-330 7.50 8411 Intl. City Management Assn. - Contr. 7-10-305 3.75 8412 Wesley Johnston - Svcs. Contr. 7=-25-201 78.00 8413 Kellogg Supply Inc. - Supplies - Contr. 8-50=-330 8414 Jess Lares - Petty Cash -,Various Tog 8415 Lawndale Concrete Prod. - Supplies Contr. 13-22-330 29.56 8416 Lawyers & Judges Pao. Co. - Book City Atty. Contr. 4-00-305 4.45 8417 Leisure Crafts - Supplies for Rec. Dept. Contr 8-25-344 26.80 8418 Lion Uniform - Shirt -Noble, Uniform Ed. Chesson Contr. 12=00=313R 52.50 8419 Livingston Graham - monthly billing Contr. 13-21-330 1,024.38 8420 L. A. County Sheriffs Dept. - Police Dept. Contr. 11-00-203 25.00 8421 Void 8422 Hickeys Deli - Food purchases for Police Dept. Contr. 11-00-311 201.90 8423 Oxford Chemicals - mop heads - Contr. 13.27-330.2 15.44 8424 Perrys Plants - Supplies - Contr. 8-50=330 11.08 8425 Ken Parr Leasing Inc. - Contr. 11-00-242 909.40 8426 Ramada Inn - Various depts. 166.91 8427 Red Star Ind. Svc. - Supply wiping rags - Various depts. 33.70 8428 Savin Diversified Equip. Leasing - Contr. 6-00-301 35057 8429 Sevin Bus. Machines Corp. - Supplies Contr. 6-00-301 153.42 . 8430 Sinclair Koppers Co. - Contr. 8-50-330 20 50 8431 So. Bay Brake & Wheel - Police car svcs. - Contr. 11-00-241 57.37 8432 So. Bay Car Wash - Contr. 11-00-241 45.00 8433 South Bay Radiator - Police car repairs - Contr. 11-00-241 137.86 8434 So. Calif. Humane Society - Dog Licenses Sold by SCHS Contr 6=00=228 2,565.90 8435 So. Calif. Edison Co. - Street Lighting - 13-24,-207 70992.30 8437 So. Calif. Gas Company - Monthly billing 88.64 8436 So. Calif. Edison Co. - Monthly billing 699.50 8438 Sparkletts Drinking Water Corp. - Monthly billing 7.67 8439 Norvin J. Stafford - Misc. exp. Contr. 6-00-222.4 32.00 8440 Mary R. Stonier - Petty Cash 129.85 DEMANDS AND WERRANTS M December 1, 1970 Continued Issued to: 8441 Supreme Paint Co. m Supplies Contr. €-50=330 8442 H. I. Tullis Co. , Inco ® Svc. = Contr. 13®28-330 8443 Union Mutual Life Ins. Co._ d Group Ins. Contr. 6-50-406 8444 Western Psychological Svc. w Manson Evaluation ,Conti. 7.10=214 8445 Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.- Refoofing Clark Com. Bldg. 8.50299 8446 B. F. Wonderlic ® Personnel Test, Form B Contr. 7@10-214 8447 Steve Burgess -o Rec. Aviv. Reim. Acct. #2 8448 J. Michael Brennan - Oil Painting Instr. Rec. Reimb. #12 8449 Michael A. Gonzales - Karate Instr. Rec. Adv. Reim. #20 8450 Arrow «. Lifechultz - Rubber foam for Nativity Scene Gen. Reim. CIP #3 8451 ABC Nursery - Supplies CIP #3 8452 Void 8453 Kent Butler Signs CIP #10 8454 F. Mackenzie Brown o i Attorneys fees A.D. 69=1 CIP #13 8455 Soo Bay Engineering = Bngr. Svcs. CIP #13 8456 So. Bay Publishing Co. CIF #13 6=00=221 8457 Mary R. Stonier m Petty Cash 8458 Koebig & Koebig, Inc. - Fund 9002106 8459 Louis the Tailor, Inc. Uniforms Police Dept.. 8460 Supreme Paint - Supplies CIP #3 Amount 333.94 19.53 1,29390 10.55 1,280.00 15.90 50.00 84.00 180.00 16.10 5513 16.05 X24.9. /000 3,003.00 57502 17.84 202.33 84.24 101.33 Total 41,573.11