Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/19/71• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 9 254 AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING — Tu sday, January 19, 1971 City Hall - Civic Center Executive Session - 630 p.m. Re ular Meeting - 730 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - R3gular Meeting of January 5, 1971. A. BEAUTIFICATION AWARDS - Septenber9 October, NoveMber, 1970. B. PROCLAMATION - Heart Sunday, February 21, 1971. 1. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE - 126 Twenty -Sixth Street Single -Family Residential to Two -Family Residential - Mrs. Evelyn Dale - Recommended by Planning Commission Resolution P.C. 154-793, adopted December 21, 1970 - Proposed Ordinance for Introduction. 2. GENERAL PLAN - Oral Report by Mr. Abraam Kruschkhov, Vice President and General Manager for Planning, Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Menden- hall, Los Angeles. 3. NON -AGENDA MATTERS -, City Council. 4. OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS: a. Employee Awards Dinner - Letter dated January 8, 1971, requesting additional contribution from City toward invitation to Police and Fire Reserve Officers to attend City Employees Association's annual award dinner - February 27, 1971. b. Capital Improvement PrRaEm Mr. Sam Gingerich, President Commerce, supporting this en Letter dated January 14, 1971, from of the Board of Directors, Chamber of eavor. e. "February Sidewalk Fair" - Letter dated January 14, 1971, from Mr. Sam Gingerich, President of the Board of Directors, chamber of Commerce, expressing appreciation for use of barricades following Boy Scout Parade, February 6, 1971. d. Retirement of Frank J. Stevenson Jr. - Letter dated January 14, 1971, from Mr. Sam Gingerich, President of the Board of Directors, requesting declaration of Jaivary 28, 1971 as "Bud Stevenson Day". e. Chamber of Commerce - Allocated karisigj 1970-71 Buds - Letter dated January 14, 1971 from Dr. Frank A. Hickerson, Treasurer, Chamber of Commerce, requesting increase in monthly payments retroactive to December 14, 1970. 5. COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC a. HERMOSA BEACH COMMITTEE FOR Report from Committee Spokes. EALISTIC LAND USE PLANNING. - Oral an. b. Pedestrian Zone - Pier Avenue and Harper Avenue - Letter dated December 31, 1970, from Ellen Miller, 1224 Harper Avenue, Redondo Beach. c. Parkinqin Alleys - Letter dated September 2, 19706 from Mr. Roger Johnson, 3405 Strand f Report dated January 11, 1971, from John P. Reynolds, Public Works Superintendent. d. Police Patrol - Business Section Lower Pier Avenue - Letter dated December 286 1970, from Walter Davis, Hermosa Entertainment Corp., Letter dated January 11, 1971 from Mr. John M. Whited, 34 Pier Avenue. 6. Po1.392rtattent - Letter January 11, 1970, from Lynn f Commendation - Letter dated Cooke, 736 Gould Lane. City Council Agenda - January 190 971 6, BENCHES ALONG STRAND WALK - R port dated January 13, 1971, from Bud M. Trott, Acting City Man ger. 7. TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM Bud M. Trott, Acting City Man 1970, from William H. Berlin, 0 a. b 90 Report dated January 14, 1971, ger; Evaluation dated December Chief of Police. from 306 MAIN LINE SEWERS •-' PACIFIC CO ST HIGHWAY BETWEEN THIRD STREET AND EIGHTH STREET Approval of Plans and Specifi ations No. HB 249; Authorization to Publish Noti e Inviting Bids. CITY MANAGER RECRUITMENT - P4posed Agreement for services Griffenhagen-Kroeger, Inc., Public Management Consultants, Los Angeles. 10 NOISE REGULATION - Proposed 0 dinance No. N. S. 3986 introduced January 5, 1971 - to be consiaered for waiver of further reading and adoption. a. Metering Eq4pment- Memo dated December 30, 1970, from Bud M. Trott, requesting authorization of expenditure - Held over, from meeting of January 5f 1971. b. Civil Aircraft Noise Reduction - Letter dated December 29, 1970, from Randall L. Huriburt, Acodetical Engineer, Noise Abatement Division, City of Inglewood, Urging comment to Federal Aviation Administration. Held over frOm meeting of January 5, 1971. 11. CAMPING OR SLEEPING IN VEHICL Regulatory Ordinance No. N. S to be considered for waiver o dated January 12, 1971, from I S ON PUBLIC STREETS OR PARKING LOTS 399, introduced January 5, 1971 further reading and adoption; Memo illiam H. Berlin, Chief of Police. 12 WELL STANDARDS - Regulatory 0 dinance Mo. N. S. 400, introduced January 56 1971 - to be considered for waiver of further reading and adoption; Letter dated Noember 18, 1970, from Carl Fossette, General Manager, Central and Vest Basin Water Replenishment District. 13. NO STOPPING ZONES - Proposed itesolution adding No Stopping Zones on Aviation Boulevard and Paefic Coast Highway - Requested by Department of Public Works. or adoption. 14. NO PARKING AREAS - Proposed resolution adding No. Parking Areas on Shakespeare Drive and Eighth Place - Requested by Department of Public Works. For adoption. 15 HOLIDAYS - REGULAR EMPLOYEES. Proposed resolution required by Federal Monday Holiday Law (Priblic Law 90-363) enacted in 1968, effective January 1, 1971*or adoption. 16. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERSg a. Herondo Street Project - LGtt r dated January 12, 1971 from Don Dempsey, Assistant to Dir ctor of Property Management, regarding acquisition of parcels of property on Monterey Boulevard by City of Redondo Beach. b. Beach Ordinance - Transmitted for study only - No action requested. City Council Agenda - January 19, 1971 -3- 17. MISCELLANEOUS REPORT - City .Manager a. Temolosycity_Mm2ger -ointment and Compensation - Resolution No. N. S. 3019, for adoption. Held over from meeting of January 5, 1971, for personnel session regarding compensation. b Assistant to the Cit ManalasE - Letter dated January 110 1971, from Ronald S. Bergman, resining effective January 18, 1971. c Report on Revenue and Bx enditure - Report dated January 13, 19710 from Mary R. Stonier, ssistb.nt Finance Director. 18. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - De ember, 1970. 19 DEMANDS AND WARRANTS a. Cancellation of Warrant - Meio dated January 49 1971, from Mary R. Stonier, City Treasuer. ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION - Tuesday, January 19, Personnel Matters: I. Temporary City marlmf.E - Comatssation. (Adoption of Resolution, No. N. S. 3019 was not completed, in order to discuss compensation during this personnel session. The Resolution will come up for adoption under City Manager's Misellaneous Reports on Regular •Agenda.) II. Commission Vacancies: Park and Recreation Commission - .? seats - One term expiring October 15, 1974; two terms expiring January 15, 1975. Impxovement Commission - 2 seats Both terms expiring December 31, I973. Included for your information: Attendance Raport, all commissions, 1970. Prospective Improvement Commissioners, Suggested by various members of this ommission. (tr. Trott has a file ,ontaining all other names of citizens Aho have expressed interest in serving n a City Commission) III. Park and Recreation Commission tetter dated December 24, 1970, requesting interpretation of Ordinance No. N. S. 394 regarding length of terms. Held over from Meeting of January 5, 1971, for consideration during this personn 1 session. *(Attached is extract from Ordinance No. N, S. 394 pert ining to this Commission.) IV. City Attorney Matter. ADJOURNMENT TO REGULAR MEETING OF CIT COUNCIL - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m, • • MEOW ClaX_FAANAGEM. ACTION - R3SOLVED, that Dm!, N. Trott, 3uilding Director, b appointed Temporary City Manager, to hold maia office ofgective January 5, 1971, for and during the pleasure of the City Cottncil, aud/or wt :11 puch tinte'as a ' permanent City Manager is appointed. Motion by Councilman .rise, - Second by coilmen Bigo. Ayes3 Councilmen Biqa, VaY,des, VaXentine, Wise, Mayor Thelen.,, B001138 Anle bet: None DISCUSSION - It was agreed that compemation would be left open for discus,v,ion at a personnel session to b 'held before the next regular meeting'on Tuesday, January 19, 1971, -fad that Mr. Trott is to continue his duties as Building Director and r ain m11 Civil Service rights relating to that position. Because several hundr 4 people who wiaLed to attend this meeting could not be seated in the Council Chamber, at this point diayor Thelen adjourned the meeting to the Pier Avenue Auditorium, 710 Pier 'venue, at 7:40 p.m. The meeting was reopened at 7355 p.m. i Attendance Report — 1970 Commissioners absent three times during one year calendar period: Civil Service Commission - Commissioner Bowman - Planning Commission Commissioner Stabler - 4 CommisfToner. Collis 3 Park and Recreation Commission - Charles Post - 3 Improvement Commission - Dr. John Martinez - 6 PROSPECTIVE HERMOSA BEACH ENT COMMISSIONERS (suggested by vacuS Commissioners) 1. Rdbe t a. Vitale 1212 24th Street 374-0751 2 an Procz 925 Montgomery Drive 37e-9534 372-7855 4 Joe Clinton 2475 Silverstrand 379-4572 5. Eric Herman 1600 Monterey Boulevard 372-4595 3, Glen A, Emigh 1069 10th Street 6 Harold Robert 2014 Hillcrest 70 Janet Paye Walker 429 - 31st Street, Katie Axe' 13 - /8th Street • 374-2093 379-4773 3724655 9 Larry Tompkins 843 - 3rd Street 376 7 10, Cindy Panesl 1744 manhattan 11 Leonard Kissel /614 Bayview 379-7617 374-2139 12 Frank Pree *HIC Environmental Researdh Oggicer 374-2135 A young local merchant 14 Dr. Rdbent McIntosh Progessor at local universitYD resident. 15 Ron or Roberta Seawight 16. Willa Rogers 17. Ray Rodriguez 1970 long time AMILTSEMTE MARDI g at .a Sept or, /970 NSA. amd MT . Frank Dire 447 LeWellaw Av October, 1970 :' osand ai ,, ' a;Elroy Digni io 234 First Septeber# 1Q7nMV2Int i1� :a Gifts .t$ M+ucGoianto 1401 Hermosa Avenue Ocher, 1970 - ,g e, , - Handcrafted Furnishings is hings Terrence Smith a: Aipsocicite 810 Hermosa Avenue NoveMber, 1970 Sg hhyInp a Cocktail Bar Fermo " Entertainment Corporation 22 no ORDINANCE NO. N. S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECLASSIFYINC CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY LOCATED AT 126 tit ' TY- S iXTH STREET, FOR ZONING PURPOSES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 154, AS AMENDED, FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-2) , AND AMENDING ZONING MAP Or ARTICLE s } SECTION 302 OF SAID ZONING ORDINANCE, AS PETITIONED BY MRS EVELYN DALE., THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIty AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That after pdb1ic hearing by the Planning Commis:: held on December 21, 1970, as prescribed by. Zoning Ordinance No. N. S, ] Z 4 as amended, and after public hearing by the City Council as therein provided, the following reale. proporty ' situavted in the City of Hermosa Beach County of Los Angeles, State of Ca1ifor•ni,g , that. is Lots 13 and 14, Block 67, 1st Addition to Hermosa zosa Beach be and the z ue are h rely eciaasifi .: from R -i Single -Family Residenti;1] to R-2 Two -Family Resideettiml n©,' and the Zoning .Map of Article 3, Sect ion 302 of. said Ordinance go. N. S. 154 a's amended, be, and the 00 Mended as hereinab ye sept forth, pursuant t the provisions therefor in' Said gond.,, v ordinance set forth, as recommended by Planning CommissiOM gasolutian P.C. 154-793, adopted DeceMber 2/0.1970. SECTION 2. That said City Council has caused to be prepared a small area zap of the area or district affc cteal by the zone change hereinabOve ord red to be made, which Ealti small area m p is hereunto attache, designmted a Exhibit W0 and is hereby referred to and by thi reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Said small art .. ap is hereby adopted as, and shall c an amendment to the eatens of. they . area slum thereon and affected thereby of "Zoning Nap of the Of Iftmosa I ch's referred to in, and which is adopted by, the lOngt, of Se rt.tion 3412 of 'article S of said Ordinance No. N. S. 154 raid City, as amended SECTIOV 3. That this ore inanc shall takd effect thirty days after the dat ri of its adoption. SECTION 4. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days from the p: son the rerc f, the City Clerk shall. =we a this ordinance to be published at 1least, once in they ;moan Mach Review, a woek1y newspaper "t4 • of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: • APPROVED AS TO FORM: , 1971. PReSIDEta o the City Council, an MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach4 Malifornia CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY EY F C..a.__DAT E/_.d: (- S 49.1C':'_T'J^S dr� �� _.;..4 1t:tg�..GT -- SHHEE71+dG7.,__,. o l CHKO 6Y_. __ . _iiATC ._.. 6.A.k/I2 • el L..6 '.a itsA..•^'a "d..of _ i_"_/.. ._;f?' "J ., JOB rda._.. _ ✓.". ;' �, .sus .ra'. . A?. / s.. „A. 1+. .47. . CNA Afe4L2 404/ 6'A 77 c� ..•••••® leg' ft. • • RESOLTUON P.C. 154-793 A RESOLUTION OF THE OJTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING A CHANGE OF LAND USE "ZONE AT 125 -26TH STREET AND RECOMMEND/NG SAME TO THE caw -COUNCIL. 14" PIEREASo at e public hearing held December 21, 197C, the City Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach, considered the request of Evelyn Dale for a change of land use zone classifieation from R-1 single family residential to R-2 two family residential, on lots 13 and 14, Block 67, 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, the• City Planning -Commission considered the location and situation of said properties in relation to abutting zones which are; Cel on the north; R-3 and R-1 on the east; R-1 on the south; and C- on the, west; and HEREAS, after due consideration, it is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the proposed change would not be detrimental to the general welfare of the ctity, based on the following findings in fact; 1. In the opinion of the Planning Commission the highest end best use of the subject property Would be medium density • residential. 2. The R-2 zone would act as a buffer between R-1 and C-1 zones. 3. In the opinion of the Planning Commission no imposition on adjoining R -I properties will be created as a result of this zone change. NOV; , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach hereby approves the subject request and establishee a ten foot setback on the subject block of 26th Street and recommends same to•the Otty Couritcil. AYES: Commissioners Collis, Foote, Ai,ulfinger, Stabler, Toole V attars, and Chairman Noble NOES: None ABSENT: None • • -2 - CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.3'1 154.-793 has been adopted by the 1annirg Commission of the Oily a Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting held on December 24 1970. • DATE JAMES D. GOLLL SECRETA( JO B. i'OBLE CAI1MilY • M INT!: ES or TlicE REG U 7.11,R LET IN G OF TE COM S.I.0:6"; HELDt1T THE COUNCIL 0liplii3ERn, cm HALL, HERIAOSA BEACH, ON MONDAY DECEMBER Z £970, AT 7:30 P.M. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 734 P.M. BY CHAIRMAN NOBLE. ROLL CALL: Pee ea°, Cossioer Coli Foote, Mulfinger, Stabler,. Too1e Vatters,'and Gila trill an Noble Absent: None Motion by Comm„ Mulfinger, seconded by Comm. Toole to approve the minutes of the previous meeting„ subject to the following correction: i) Page 2,, last paragraph, substitute the word "by" for the word "for." (Corn, Coins) Re splut,L2n24 C, Motion by Comm„ 1,1',atters, seconded by COMM MulAngar to apow Resolutions 1"„C„. 154-791;792„ AYES: Commisstorisos Collis, 'Foote, Muifinger, Stabler:0 Toole V, atters, and Chairman Noble NOES; None ABSENT: Nonc. Cit Planner Crawford exPlaiz,,ed the retauest of,,Evelyn Dale for a change of land 1.1;30'Zone from R-1 to R-2 on lots 13 Enid Z4.„ block 67, 1st Add- itional to Rana mia Beach tract, located at 125 - 26th Street, under provisions of ,Article of City 7c,7=ning Ordinanc.te N.S. /54, as amended. He reported that the, property in question was comprised of two lots fronting on Manhattan hvenue„ He said they are,-.,..urcently developed with one single family dwelUng which is built ao'os t lotline. The applicant's v4quest, t epproved„ would then allow them to have an additional dwelling unit„ Hs rep;Zted. that the properties which abut:, the property in question am zoned C-1, developed with apartments, the property to the south is zoned R-1, the properties facing subject lot across Manhattan 1Vveaue are zoned R-3 and R-1. Mr. Crawford said that this request appeared to be a reasonable gradation of density from the 0-1 to the R-1 p.--operties, acoss the saeet; that the General .Plan approved the requested. density. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 7:45. Evelyn Dale, of 125 -26th Street„ said that in the R-1 zone to the south, half -lots were being utilized as R-2 already. He said that by zoning Planning C,Ioramission December 2i 1970 the property R-20 it would be a buffer zone between R-1 and R-3,.zones. No one appeared in opposition. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7z 47.. _ Comm. FOote asked Mr. Date how he intended to develop his property. Mr. Dale said he was going; to deveiop en extra- unit over the garage. Comm. CoIlls wanted to know how the existing structure was situated on the /ot.. Mr. Crawford answered that there was proper set back on the alley and on the garace. Chairman Noble asked the Co if they thought it would be wiser to rezone the property in question to R-3 or C-01. • Comm, V atters said he thought the subject property should not be • zoned C-1. He also said he does not want to set a precedent by zoning the subject property R-3. He said that he felt R-2 was ap- propriate. Other Commissioners concurred with Comm._ V. atter's • comments. Comm„ Foote moved, 3'omm. Toole seconded, that the requested change of land use zone from R -I to R-2 be granted; and that a ten foot front yard be established on 26th Street, AYES Commissioners Collis, Foote, Mulfinger, Stabler, Toole V. atters, and Charman Noble NOES: None ABSENT: None Comm. Foote moved, 1;ognaV alters seconded adoption of Resolution P.O. 154-793, recommencliag to the .City Council that the land use zone on the subject property be changed from R-1 to R-2, based on the following findings in fact: 1. In the .opinton of the Planning Commission the highest and best use of the subject propszty would be medium density. residentizIe The R-2 zone viould act as a buffer between R-1 and C-1 zones. In the opinion of the Planning Commission no imposition on adjoining R-1 properties will be created as a result of this. zone change. 4„ There shall be a setback of. ten feet established on the:26th Street frontage. Planning Deceinber 21, 1970 • . AYES: Commissioners Collis Poote„ 3 lulfinger, Stabler, Toole Waiters, and Chafxman Noble NOES: None ABSENT: None klaigned Deyelappept7qqe,, Th6\psoposed amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance„ N.S. 154, estabkishing a "PD Planned Development" zone clasSification, City Planner,. Crawford. said the planned development zone had been under developliipnt for from one and one-half years by the zoning committee. He said he,.felt it Was the proper alqpoach for development ftetbtlity in the city. \ge said that a certain antount of open space, livability space, and u4abIe recreation space would be Fequiredo. He said that with the peoposed regulations the Planning Commission would be freer w assign„the density in any direction. Mr. GFawford 0:,,f.plated that the purpose of a planned development ordinance was to enccUrage a balance between the floor area and. open space with a much'ipetter asSIIV;IEICe o: quality, Comm. Collie asked about density increase allocaUon for abutting parks and M Crawford replied that one fUstification for a high rise structure could be its proximity to large open ,spaces, Comm. Collis also asked why ',residents a Hertmc*z Beac,-,:hwould want a Planned Development zone. Comm. Stabler answered that the Planned Development zone was basically 'a concept of developing ?nore than one lot at a time. He said it was of little 1213.0 thinking a Sinai' indd,ual parcels . but when thinking of, tot& Mocks or largetareas it would allow better space utilization. He said from a develoPMent concept it allows the most flexibilityof design. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 3:2,4 1),I+11. Mao Hossinstein of 121,1 2.1st Street, asked the Commission if a 1PD zone would encou7age high rise areas along the; Strand, and if it would open doors for large developments. Comm. Stabler answered saying that the ,:.;otanlission was trying to'.create a Planned Develop- ment one and said there were checks and balances which would have to be satisfied before this would be allowed. :,30zrart. Collis added that EiGINIIOSa Beach has had inferior .apanment • • ANALYSIS 7-70-7 Request: Changeof land use zone from R-1 to R-2. Property: Lost 13 and 14, Block 67 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach. • Location: Northwest corner of 26th and Manhattan Address: 126 - 26th Street • Applicant: Evelyn Dale,. 222 N. Poinsettia-, Manhattan Beach, Calif. Analysis: - The remainder of this block is zoned C 1. Some of the C-1 zoned properties front on Manhattan. Aevenue, Most are oriented to Greenwich Village „ Properties facing subject lot across Manhattan Avenue are zoned R-3 (north of twenty-sixth) and R-1 (south of 26th). Properties across 26th are zoned R-1, developed R-1. The property in question is comprised of two lots fronting on Manhattan Avenue. They are currently developed with one single family dwelling which is built across the lot line. In such a case a second dwelling may not be built. If the zone is changed to R-2, 6 second dwelling May be built on the back of the combined lots. It may not be sold separately without.a lot split. If the existing dwelling is removed, or the lots redivided, up to two duplexes could be built on the properties. The actual use of most abutting and facing properties is duplex or medium density dwellings. Recommendation: On the basis of the present zone and land use pattern, and the uses projected in the General Plan, this appears to be a reasonable request. If approve& 6 front yard ten feet should be established for the 26th Street frontage. kPR • APPLICATIO CHAIM Ole ZONE TO TM GITY-OFHERMOSII BRACH MUM COMMISSILINs W74-the:arnera of raa/ property met.cvpoeito aur rospeotitt names, plitition to hove the CM -Taming Orilioa emptiedbjroulsonifying from . .gcms R-1 to Sono ths following clesozibod reopertyv kiaLEMEARUNLIsa40&.fiatIOLAILLTaaMUMArt.thik.u..00.,..........,... ....2.4fdatr"stegaain L.12.1.1/taiMfa.-altIlatenam., .„„424.4,Acemxtek".40jaagokti&.1. ettil AttAO goVn 1:::okerdit liallogjewthe Ifto Tarieb Jent WAD 04 Vert AMEND s • 5),..5.21.1%61‘96701,70143.441011014,7411Lai.44612a. ft'ho pr er..10:34412t I•.. -tor batmen ana tae2thee.ittfatitt4rNa=4,,....miftd)..4016.41..... Street -/'47.040.,40J LtibffilliNtrx,=vinzrotilmoaa yr.m=mo.411.7ouroWitiantsle0500Wasumttifteome42Mmtltaminammum 11:;"lif 1. Boma pzitoll woe -catty romtvo m propemea Ohsvgat tftee real sama to the oomamity fee memo of 'ate %men mmes permitted by the SOW TOSO*StOa tthom wask be we eA ta awes atrafitty Mat titl sir4'4 MVO 7 A,A1 plain your ansuerp eA041441mTbAS tbs xamonmatag Pg"749tY Am loll " t1-4) Pr2IP 4YtIYwormei to roolismeleto) .----Cegys-euatarises4449V-40102211Mw.64graanati . . iteionwomdatt, 41. t.TItto4abentatinfatt44&14 4WatArialkillesA4M4hd*OINAhM, .a.LITIS=42,1Z2232MISISIV0210 stikA.T.A. ixasarcorsaarrexam.. .4'.1I.4,•2,14•??,4„1;+•f. •••.1.? I • naatrinvizelDemetivam.es 2. Io the pToporty Awkived Is the pemes4 reasesifieation MOTO aultdblo for the purpowa permitted lm the givegiamo4 amsalfloattom them for the peredtted im ths Desna t clemaYlmatiem? (Ammar e,e:qpletel rgive all f gour azzaero) —roe *r•—•r.••••'4.4'.1)4. --(41,1k4 '•I; *nag- • AWL e#0,40.0a44,44, . , °''a6t4'47StggMirrggERA"Zaaalta"4Sefkttee2g2ZYVE"Egrjf"I't'X4Cte"4Mge4t" 7"24Yrneft""tabliPrACCALLASAAWRZOIIMAganteW j. •1. SACC^attaM312WAVAL.447 • • 3 euX4 tho US4M permitt00 by thc wqpmed one 4c, datrlaisr,ta:z ln any tiny t€ curronAding prugarte, gx.p4an ealieetto eitkoP,,tAng ;.,,,1,11° unmet —4017----2-MtireatAr Powtspevirjr-Vetatei-40.414--aos- --4,,attrAnott)..fautueimf tenneettleet-lasksessa.theF-teda.,smaisalay... ---zeoiaoA-G-vl-ezktqa .aEr-uhftaltygiez:-lxiw,A-*Aiv.rAisv.sattkdigmoas..4fAnmos&t....... mgr e..--,...2741,WiffatAbila-WhilatIVEover::::zitralIZJaw=rrnecragnMuse...*.e.mtrgvmsrr........szscm=aftw.w.rmuas;ovmomireamiraisRuansznatmvatomsz. " 40 Vita& wawel t§V arlfitani tea maragtotlenso arm) 04MOOVadi4 tkg trips law a WAG MOItteg am tk6 ,t1W luveavoe 011mq t%, expiration thoom rearlemeoso cirma my womb r th7:.rostvi- Ammo ante s, gpompriy .Ao.f4ritlko-14 tim portLomm thot tm =saw Alen4) • ...nigtassyszalmr.socaurgoommat.rxemniasititemporrtm.zwrocutrtmaporazouglaramigisnottnipeloottxmareartoutaranatenistoma, ea g...4nr.seartraMsonsioriprollerrAMCC-Xlg 10:1 onclemmabwrzsr-mm.320ete=2.1;ViCi" lantnii=2•14WZ21=60tAW4.1,34' . • 444;eximmiltin..sittfitautnitissmerizsgttrumetteXiettkamoaremose 4" 4 pisramiltuiEWBV&Intraegscamersatztoise.f " ......--z'sni--.TOMr...r.K.1-'mumilmtlirMagarMII'MrmiL74'476-ZgPr.W=0Danraganay...sluseeroitxrecranorsarranartmaumaxioniMaiasenacaumon to9 tke madmalmst prom almeatobreestals-pwst proportiem nro :Nmanget, 44:114 ugelassiti9stlam amain 1 tNe ava1A2M lava% driMISS ow weave tittetat Copt row (*do cpwo lo fov mignatamo a armigift elf yeateNte ostnanr W0110 Kropp:ma maolmolfientgomo Meet Wes cheats if nedowaygo) 10. OE 70,20. e n,•-vggptsmatetworximiLVIV•De etrOCOMMOM01.10/214,111.49. 0.7.114.9.903.0121..nariSRO leseatrAMTIVIRri=mustitrowMOVanaMManwurK3=1:In emaromumwar.ammumarm. CVIV:01114aMISMIDallteratliVVEZWeil:VDCWpCIMMVU ...setaumammassedarrax aretaroMIsCRVIMISZ=fil, itransw.MWMCP. cninur,romasemtatreor.estbtedwurcarazirracsammuttztamosnezaramono *MOM* aZE/M2521=z. ertattglit...m. acrACRIZIArant9e11611111211intsocr.00=2AVEXV.i, 0,=,EWISERICIVaaa.ynits.CMTA3410.0CIMMIERT1.1611N EISISITCM AnliZMIXIAPIND 41136.114130.. it • t IN f3 7.12.-- ererarvIret=z1..117Ziatasatwr.saszoonnaartnas fttniania eSEMITASsso . "Maittalm.04., ..nraR120,2.100.4 blan.e.C.4ltusraxermorneacamiso ,nist0.10r412 ItaZIamentealnMessintatoresner pecennt, CraggaffeCIEND MS110004ausosoro • rearbeware.....ftiltbeiltorMal clasMarmorontamtlaterairlinwogemo*WariCrisOKIMA• 411.4•11VA.R610....trantuctocuMWWM1s=tailtiorezmat.famentilgtta:St=afxThr qtlieCrANS• CROWLISSIGIND IMMCCLICOMIWO ofoats21.1}2192. ...x.4.1Mre6===traltSVAV-2M.Miran=11.11WeraMitietolf5CO wogreRssam. nrcanurawsvezminutletwanommtaamnalMaranscuszareastrAmtsum rtaxamanustrangsrmlannexteavermaftsw anemia 421,3*Ceasse3 011:8MzeloW1F4:11 xes.rapoteManzoGS:11100. AiVrieseancelr,ca • tf611021 SIAMEM9 CCLIIERAMICIND MOSL22/31110tb.. 01.6.S.PROLTIMMACCAZFOXII, adormirstenutaturAcgollar.miallawsreuriOntWatailtslO 611141LISMODCRAIMMeoireravIrMs3a4MOCGITCSIIRSt enMSUO2armaro 4111ARPAZtatsa2. ere....,0:ttometweracesmeseas ers=t1-131.10r54MaPsINAastaIRMIZSIER* 032.131II.M.M.raal Keee...m.C6PSWItells...114:100 inbarmy.crteAtuex061112210 erglisosmeommerenurxatiteraireemsun .....--amr,renuzamocArmageno• affleaanamssotwaxnemt VitTaMLIVIONMSAVICaltriaM •ftrigeiNI=VMS11.11.3VAPPIPM031 C.15,1VeS01 4stLYZAWZMOZIS, • FEW4 01. 3 eft:arse lantittaziaini, attlERatunoats, ▪ ansellUilinteate, ainstrinuruma *FiA9672S4ISMURIIM1ADOWC111.10474SWORMen CO!Mt4220 01202MCMIIM, 4VAMaiaRIZIO IStIOStorn ,r-gaaRrAtIP ettreamtgrgamra-SrxixramaM=smaomftwmegemewaspeo. .stumme ausnissMtteP esobrocasnMik aeltrittalS.W.C/Ciles....mos...nalauste.trmamtserseuemetem emSsacern tirmaciteffiscao 49191.2"RIMO • • MINEgp$ AfTEDOIT STATE 2 CLY0ahlA urn CP MIMOSA MACE cowry op LOS MOM= .6B0 F-42.4,,,1 la,10..) .........,...,,...,......v.2%—.....—...-..-.•• ,Ctif. arli LUMP O., i . imt gamB in I' LA) owovov &lino® amd may thr I a% tho omow a part, ,ax. ail) Ad the pty in-, volvwd Lad that tai appllostios hau lo*am propozod in coompAio with . quiroment,, a the lemma Rwit City Rawlins Commimalmn ea printed heroim ' tho revtgoiAe infalamtion tholeoue2ly ma omplotolyp tD the boot of mg abilityp proaouta ttpa arsvaamt t kohc.12 of the applidation herwelth emlalttedd eat the totatemtem ma. teasrottioit Om* raiiNamed •r•oe nee ill Oa respe,:te true awl avoirect to tat bit el,' mr knowlettOp ea), MU. to ' TA:ophent Zo,, 'Ff. 7,1) 0 '60 i Virglat tAdi,oulti ligeL&...w azonziarrizacuniellYTMIMerMWIRMYWAnc. 4 '' .1can t''''a'440-.4'" St4 ' 110:45,W=MOMW1==========MMM,=== . . r.:1%11126 Ogageso ig,a,.,.?. , O. , glakirkimirek, - Pi ,„•:-.0..,,•,,-,,:s! :-.....,.,,,:,•:: BubsaTibmd and mom q5 ttedn MS A 4a1_,,,„ Ow dmmj.9 :#)) raliZTETEZEirir' u4- Thin la to 'Dora* %bat tbd ftrlegoSas applieetlom•tula inapsoti4 rwoind to bo empleto eatmanoptable g62 wit& tbe Eggsam Sam% OoNviotAom. 41"thile2_, 51212E3742.01170. TIAIRNIV qatileLfE.,"4 41. 1. RUN PER 30 PCIR MTLIOAMM - nu tar 40 PROPORAREE • 1. 3,6otion Ian of Warialet &Bo 549 goiamlres a, Min fee of 6114)000 to be paid alt th6 umm e glaftg gm ...weat:i.am f ft 14? iii. Thic f lw to partty *mar Oa Goat to thr City th% mdvartielago Lowootigati 'and hendlimg tko gmlloatica tkmAqh ito rarielo 2. ram AMIGO= maneg QF MB met toll/Rod eat evalotoly with tal =mare cagh quoationo Th application mnat oivasid berm the Piamaing Coxmlooids Etometeryo OT Motary Maio hy ant off the omega. Bimatuxes ef othp23 gRelr2 ef property propad to No ohsaged ehould mowed. ttero pommibloD Sigoattoeo cr camp* or prAperly oontigumuz to tint peoxieed to bo ehansed avoid .1#4 600017X3419DOMO.VOStigeo Wat thont agnatmron wa mat zwerzwai4, . 3. EROTOMPES of tgo Foogorty lavoived a a oleo /twee enough to illvatrate tho embpate motar disomaimme ilTiewo helpful to tH- $34..00lon Are aro ovepotea ma extibtte with thie appliomtlea. Khan mbove refailvemasta mro mtp filo APPWATI and MAP with the Buonosa Tem& Cit, Planning Ocimiazione !EM "mot b. ?t2 in every reAtt., w,,th LLL qmzetions 'and damlude mammal, Item the Semetary aan voesiva. certify thm potitim. Pme* .3 of 3 January 8, 1971 dit TO: Bud M. Trott, City 1u -imager FROM: Paul Crawford, Director, H. B. P. D. Reserve Corps Clifford Fowler, •Firs, Chief •SUBJECT: Request for additional funds for Itaaratua31 Employees' Award Dinner Reserve Officers Sir: At the regular Hermosa Beach ch City Council r& seting of January 5, 1971, the City; Council approved to expenditure diiture of $400.00 00 for the Hermosa Beach City Dirkployeee Annual Award Dinner. Appal ret1y, the Police and Fine Reserve officers were net included in this motion that was approved. We would res- pectfully request that additional money in the approximate amount of $150.00 he approved, sso thet.the Police and .Fire Reserve Officers mar be invited.to attend ae guests of the City, thus show- ing appreciation to. these Reserve Officers.. As in the past, the money allocated includes the regular member and hi@ spouse or guest. The request for the additional sum of $150.00 wouldcover the price of the dinner for the Re-. serve Officer only, and the spouse or guest's dinner would be. the responsibility of the Reserve Officer. The $150. 00 would pay for 23 Police Reserve Officers and •7 Fire Reserve Officers . PBC /lin Tespectfully oubtraitted PAUL B. C A W FOrt Director . 13. P.D. Resery CLiFFOF D FOCI., Fire Chief. 422 PACIFIC COA38, Zfiet4WAV 'P. 0.37 14E6111 03A avACt a CAQlPi MBA 0412S4 VEUIP11014Es 213 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach City Half., Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California ?i4 Gentlemen: January 14, 1971 The Legislative Committee of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, under the chairmanship of Mr. Eric Rafter, his made a study of the Capital Improvement Program as submitted t you by the City Manager on December 3, 1970. Acting on the recommendation of our Legislative Committee, the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce has parsed a motion expretiming our general approval of the Capital Improvement Program. We ale,,, rieh. to coax send the liermos .: Beach Planning Commission, the City Planner, Mr. Robert Crawford, and all those city empl.oyoes and private cithhens who contributed toward the compilation of an elzdellent program. We feel that this type of lorag-range anning is a very important function in providing for the orderly development of our city. Please an assured that you have our wholehearted support in this endeavor. Respectfully oubmitted, YROGial C{ woe cc: Mr. Robert Crawford, City Planner Mr. Joe Noble, Chairman; Planning Commission Mr. Bud Trott, City Manager. 857E PACIFIC COAST F11c NW/1T Q F. 0. �IRRAlotid f6RACItl g CAL t*' HI !©kS4 ®TE U/MONTt 111 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of HerrnoeEa Beach City Halls Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 January 14. 1971 Gentlemen: At the reviler Me e$ a g of the oa.rd oi' Directors ;r,f the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, held on January 13, 1971, than Officer j> and Members of the Board approved the following motion: Acting on behalf of the members a the Hermosa a Beeach Chamber of Commerce the Board of Diresctore wishes to enpa'e€ s our :pp 'o iation .to the City Council for its action in authorizing the temporary rricad n ;>ff otreote during our "February Sidewalk Fair" which to to be held indaltrfilteMS1 Hegmoaaa Beach on February fb, 1971. We are informed t t thin le the first a lees pre tion event of Ito type to be held in Hermosa Beach in ffetr or five ye; ,ra b, nd we believe that it will be beneficial to the comma>, <l y at large in that many y vieitoro will have an opportunity to get better aacquat ted a fth esur beam esemene We are grat.; , ell for y action and for the e. setetaa ce given by many .pity employees . t tie eev. nt ; °;aualible.• . SG:3R Ial a�. • leactff'aally. E uttw.=4D 41c HAM . HgRit-A03/4 HAC H 0 CALIPORN§A Q412.S4 TELEPHONE! 213/344-444.41 0 P. 0. ptif,fr 432 PACMC Cc?/UT&150PRVAY January L4, 1971 HOE rabae Mayor and Members of the City Council • City of Hermosa Beach City Hall, Civic Center He moa Beach, California 902.54 Gentlemen: On December 3t 1970, M. Frank J. Stevenson, Jr. „ Assistant Director of the Los Angeles C.'ousity Department of Beaches, retired ending a 42 year career of ocean lifeguarding. During this long and distinguished career. in public service, Mr. Stevenson has won the friendship and admiFation off the people of Hermosa Beach and of all the other South Bay communities. • Many of those who wish to express their appreciation for this lifetime of service are 'having a retirement party for Mr. Stevenson on January 28, 1971. The Board 4c, Directors of the Hermosa, Beach Chamber of Commerce requests that, tke an additional and appropriate gesture, your honorable body resolve and declare that January 28th, 1971, be kW n as "Bed Stevenson Day". Reopectfully submitted, Sam Gingeric Pr ,sidAit JR:SO4,1 cc: Captain John Her e Lot Angolea County Lifeguards. and Los Angeles County Department a Beaches • • cHAMrER � COMERE °t; 4?) Kw FA Yr mER 33i PH'C1Fi6" f i�EM3V NICHWAV• P. 0. BOY. 406 R OSt �8'a(:U.1 a •ALIPORfst, 4Y3ms c TaLER64OR3g, siS , .5, January 14, 1971 Honorable Mayor and embers of the 'City COUriCil City of Hermosa Beach City Hall, Civic Center Hermosa Beach, Califo;enia 90254 Gentlemen: The Chamber of Commerce in the city of 1- er ona Beach at this tin'ie wishes • to petition your honorable body for the additional binds that have been allocated • at prior City Council meeo>• ingo. • These 'commitments were made in. conjunction with the reerent for hiring the new Chamber Manager at:an inCre.aatd Salary. • Reference is made to a letters from the City Manager to the City Council dated June Z4tb,a 1970, indicating that there Vas $18, 410. 00 for general promotion available for the Chamber of CoMmFace. Vie, at VMS time, are petitioning for • the $18, 410.00 and $u19.00Oo 00 of the $1,600.00 that wam rs' ;tai.hed..for City events E. nd programs so that the Cillo atioli to the C c : e'k; of Cep rar rce• will now be a • Monthly amount of $1, 617,.1.50,• ins to :d o the >Tevio:is $1,166.00 per month. As the new Chamber Manager, Mr. Jatnem gea arta..„, was hired December •loth, . 1970, we are requesting that this ingrease be made r etroaCtive•to tba,t date. r`letip:,Ictfu,l..y Ebtsp'ukitted9 Fr&aa x e, °` n icker;, soon A:tJR iaa1 • Dear Sirs: possibl t Pir AvHarper, fr Market. C 0 I' Dec 31 - 70 paint a Pedestrian Zone o Jack in th Box to Boy's So many children co th,;. Pt. there, and the care dont slow down for them. 1 am Aire if a Pedestrian Zone was thre it would help slow down the car and maybe save a life. Please think about. Thank yo d Happy Mew Year. ls, Ellen Miller 1224 Harper Av Redond. Beach Calif.. CIS'' OF h EPK4O5A BEACH TO. Bud M. °Trott, City Manages DATF n ' 11, 1971 suojE T Parking in Alleys, Letter dated 9/2/70 FROM, John P. Reynolds, Public Works. Supt 6 The parking in alley situation can easily. be resolved by removing.the "No .larking This Side" signs and replacing them. with "No Nirking ita Alle `". The temporary barricades placed On ShakesNare Driv ; - 1 each north and south of Longfellow have , n in place severol months, and have apparently resolved some of the traffic problems which brought about this test program. T recommend that you request permission •from the 4Zity'' Council to install permanent barricades .at the location of the tempoa y ones Cost not to exceed $50.00 each. JPR:jus Encl: W sl y POe1 City ager City of Hermost De Hr. 1 , : meting to empress ,. r concern over a ng conflict A.;, Cels. eo concerningess king is alloys. 1 reside tt 3405 Strand, and you fro games in this is through an Eley loenteg aide of -Hermosa ®vee This a13e 'ie poste, -9So parkin i ,Y the ::at vide,then el Another parking ordinance howevelirp s .,wstes_thst x <, 4. king ie ,any alley. • 1 have discussed thie.. e�ituationa with the of permitted s.iu departmentagreed that a nnf1 ;ems -e stag street Por the following reasons, 1 f >,<{ 1 that an ezoeption should net our alley, and that it hou1d bo similarly posted: 1. Temporary barriers have recently been erected to limit or slow traffic in the alley (which the residents Would like to see de j. eroanont J $ authoris parking increases the traffic flow and makes it r^:;.:ch a or€ .difficult for r sidentee and oomelercial vehicles to get through, especially on congeited weekends. 2. ,Visitors seeing ears parked iri the alley aro tempt d to par on the east aide also, or in front of garages. This has occurred more and more, freequee ntly of late. 3. Hermosa Avenue Pap petered paring in this area during the sung and residents perry sticker fees for the privilege of t* street, yet a few cars each day parking on park in the alley acst no cost. 4. Inn .east messy the eotrano s to homes moat often used by guests are those fronting on th;: e .eeyvand it le tot discouraging to havea o r parked a foot or two away fro as front door. 5. With the large number of chi.1dre e 1i. ing in the area, vehicular traffic in the alley should to wept to on absolute minimum. This problem is. ad itte dly seasonal, but it is .acute. Thos : neighbors with whop I hairs spoken erre in agreement. 1 would appreciate it if you ,.,:,,*uld look into this matter. Septa ber 2p. 1970 c in SInp Roger t. oAtii t.cce 06,taiNTANCE. Lmks, fprr;cits (ALTER DAVIS risuivc aol GH aoLork PAcoroc rothoT stemNWAY ill.0014EK% tEtCK,CMAKRIfitfl Ju? Macomber 2 , 1970 Ms. Mary Edgert.ne City Clark City of HLrmosa Beach Civic Center Hermos Beech, California 90254 Dear Ms. Edgerton: <Joe rei3 TELEPHow 316- (64414 4 This letter is being written in my capacity as an officr, member of the Board of Directors and major shareholder of Hermosa Entertainment Corp. dba Pier 52 (52 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California) and dba Schlumpfelders (22 Pier Avenue, Hermosa each, California ). Since the day that our corporation took over the management and operation of Pier 52 I have had a number of conferences with various city officials including the Chief of Police who have continually advised me that they were well pleased with the method under which we conducted the business, the controls which we exerted thereon and the general overall ' improvements to the neighborhood as a result thereof, The mame has held true @ince we converted the old Hermosa Inn into Schlumpfelders which many consider the showplace of the South Bay. NotwithstAnding the ,t'''forts which we have made to maintain internal controls on our establishments, there is one problem area over which we have no control and over which we are becoming increasingly more concerned. The problem involves the ever increasing number of people who loiter and congregate on the sidewalks on Pier Avenue in front of our establishments and other businesses on the street. We have had many comments from p ople who abtiolutely refuse to patronize any of the busitysses on Pier Avenue because of this situation.We feel that it not only ffects the Pier Avenue business but the entire city because of the impression it gives to outsiders who come to the Pier Avenue area. • K:. Nary Edgerton, City Clerk City of Hermosa. Beach December 28, 1970 Page 11 Since there is absolutely nothing which we:, as businessmen, c do mut this situation we must call upon the City Council for some help in a1levi, ti %g the problem. We have discussed this with some of the businessmen in th , area and we L . 2 1. that one approach Amy be to maintain an off duty polios .offic: ' in uniform in this area during certain late afternoon and evening hours. ;, feel that if this course of action is taken number of the Pier Avenue businesses would very well be willing to pay for the time that any such officer puts into this work.. At any rate, we would appreciate this matter being put before a regular meeting of the Htrmosia Beach City Council as the situation is becoming more intolerable every day. Since all of the business people on Pier Avenue are affected by .this , T asp sending a copy o: ' this letter to them as well as to the Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, all of the Councilmen and the Chief of Police. Thank you for your cooper tion. Very truly yours, r 4YS WDPck - WALTER DAVIS cc. Quentin T"he1a;in, Mayor Ben Valentine, Councilman Al V Ades, Councilman M1k « ;E iqo, Councilman Jack Mee, Councilman William Berlin? Chief of Police Je anis We t Robert's Liquor Store Burg., rworld Mermaid ReOta urs= t Taco Bell • Taco Bill Lighthouse Pio':. Mr. C's Best Foods Jean's Apparel Shop Jean's Apparel ,for ken Johns Barber Shop • • COPY City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California Gentlemen: 34 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California January 11, 1971 This is a letter in reply to the one sent to Walter Davis by the Chief of Police, William Berlin, regarding the solution to the problem of undesirables congregating on the streets of. Hermosa, and, particularly, in the business sections of lower Pier Avenue. I, too, have had many expressions of revulsion and just plain fear of some of these people and their actions and have, without a doubt, sacrificed quite a bit of business because of them. Since I am one of the people on the list sent to Walter Davis and having had my opinion solicited, I will state as follows: Last year when Don Finley was on foot patrol, this situation in the business section was almost entirely cleared up. Many remarks were made to me and other businessmen as to the change for the better in the area. Now we have some patrol on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays which, without a doubt, helps immensely; but on OTHER nights of the week there is no patrol from four o'clock in the evening on through the dinner hour, I grant that patrol cars come into the area periodically, but they certainly are not able to see the things that the man on foot sees. Also, the street people know when the shifts change and sometimes take advantage of that time to loiter, make their 'buys, etc. This is also the time when many people would like to shop, and preferably without having to walk through or around these characters. In my opinion the solution is obvious; have a foot patrol cover this area more of the time the entire week, even if at times it may seem not to be needed. When the street people learn that the police are NOT there, they usually congregate, especially in the summer. Get the City a reputation of not putting up with these things now, then this will carry over into the summer and make the summer patrols easier. Many of us are in agreement also that the men on the beat must be of the same caliber as Officer Don Finley, or as near to it as possible, as we have found that just anyone won't do. If the right man is not picked for the job, the project is without merit as has been our misfortune to see in the past. Again, in my opinion, I must say that with all of the great future plans for Hermosa which could come to pass, why continue to allow this horrible "fly in the ointment' to exist? Respectfully yours, /s/ John M. Whited COPY City Coci1 City of He: =t« .ea Beach January 15 1971. In ref .:rime to ttorney Walter Davis letter on extra patrol cooperatic>a a o I h iv e consulted with other business men of the Pier Amu a area. In gnu much I am a, large tax payer I feel it ie not my,., Ali mtf ouu to pay for extra € nforcemer: t of the law. Police fundho ld be bitter distributed for the welfare of the cemmenity. Con iderat on should be given to the fact that I have already sacrificed my income and late business hours in order to alleviate the situation. I did this by the request of the city manager Mre Wesley 1 niels and the police dept Thank you, /s/ William Grill "Taco Bill's 4 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, Calif. December 29, 1970 Walter Davis, Attorney-at-law 1611 South Pacific Coast Hwy. Suite 301 Redondo Beach, California 90277 Dear Mr. " Davis: A copy of your correspondence dated December 28, 1970, received by this department December 29th., in which you address your remarks to Mrs. Edgerton, City Clerk for .the City of Hermosa Beach. May this short letter acknowledge receipt of the copy designated for our attention. As you have indicated in your second paragraph that you have had numerous conversations with city officials, includ- ing the Chief of Police, at which time these officials have indi- cated to you that they were pleased with the operation of the Hermosa Entertainment Corporation as it affects the neighbor- hood of your operations, namely: Pier 52 and Schlumpfelders. You have expressed a growing concern, relative to the number and kinds of people that permeate themselves in and about the immediate vicinity of your operations. As you will recall, you discussed this problem with me personally on,November 5th., in the PM hours, at which time 1 informed you that we had again instituted a beat officer patrol in that general vicinity with the starting date being October 30, 1970. This patrol, on weekends, has been continued since that date, October 30th. , with the ex- ception when the weather was so inclement and there was little or no justification for placing officers in the aforementioned area. In order that the record might be very clear, for the December 29, 1970 Walter Davis, Attorney-at-law Page 2. Re:. Beat Officer. Patrol merchants, also members of the City Council,. I am listing be- low the days and hours that the patrol exists: Friday 1800 hrs — 0200 hrs Saturday 100(hhrs - 1800 hrs & 1800 hrs - 0200 hrs Sunday 1000 hrs - 1800 hrs A total of 64 hours weekly, or approximately $1, 080.00 monthly.. Further, ' in your letter you mentioned a method in which this service may be paid for, i. e., through solicitation, or as- sessment against the businessmen in the downtown area. It is my feeling that if this service is required, that it should be the fin- ancial responsibility of the City to maintain the existing services as well as any additional services that may be required. This office stands ready to consult with you and/or any other representative group relative to the police problems of this .;,; community. This letter may be reproduced for, distribution to those people and those business concerns that are listed on. the second page of your correspondence. Be assured of our continued cooperation and our interest in your problems, in respect to policing the shoddy individuals who appear to be concentrating in your area. Very truly yours WHB/lm". WILLIAM H. BERLIN, Chief of Police • • COPY Honorable Quentin L. Thelen Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California Dear Mayor Thelen: 736 Gould Lane Hermosa Beach, California January 11,1.971 My family and 1 would like to express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to Chief W. H. Berlin, Jr. and the Members of his out- standing Police Department. Currently, we are the operators of the Grand View Motel in Hermosa Beach and many times in the past we have had to avail ourselves of the services of the Police Department. The performance of the responding officers and others in the Department who participate in the protection of the citizenry reflects credit on your fine admini- stration and the city as a whole. Our best wishes to you and Chief Berlin for continued success. Very truly yours, /s/ Lynn Cooke Footnote - They saved my granddaughter's life. • • January 13, 1971 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bud M. Trott, City Manager SUBJECT: Benches Along Strand Walk Gentlemen: • Attached herewithare the present locations of the benches along the Strand walk. At the present time it is the staffs opinion that there is a sufficient amount of benches along the Strand walk. It would be my recommendation that a policy be established wherein a resident or residents can show a reasonable need for additional benches, said additional benches shall be provided, subject to the approval of the City Manager. Respectfully submitted, BUD M. TROTT City Manager BMT:mm Enclosure • ITV OF 1.1EPNAOSA B ACH 111,-EUVECIE MEMO Bud M. Trott, City Manag r Strand VJe1k Benches MRCP DATE• .'3anuary 6' 1970 FROM John Pe Reynolds, Public Works Supt AMSIMIC.6.1.15..........+0.411eftlilka.ToMPOIMMYMNP.MIOR10171.14.1:10011011111%.010 1161:(604.6.11 Benches ere located on the Strand Walk at the following locations: 1st. Street 2nd Street 3rd Street dth Street 6th Street 7th Street 9th Street 10th Street 100' North of 10th Street 11th Street 4 at the Pier approach 15th Street 16th Street 17th Street 18th Street ,2Oth.Street 21st Street 22nd Street 23rd Street 24th Street 25th Street 26th Street 30th Place 35th Street JPF:iw • • January l4, 1971 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Hermosa Beach Subject: Traffic Enforcement Program Gentlemen: After reviewing and evacuating the report which Chief of Police, William Berlin, has submitted, it would be my recommendation that the following be initiated immediately: 1. Continuation of the present program. Z. Add one additional motor officer to the program. 3. Add one additional patrolman, as provided for in the budget. The cost for this entire program for the reminder of the fiscal year would be as follows: Continuation of 2nd motor officer Additional patrolman $1900.00 .5212242.0 TOTAL $7300.00 There has been budgeted $15,000.00 for capital improvement to be used for certain alterations of the Police facilities. To date, $3500,00 from this fuhd has been approved by the City Council for the purchase of trash containers. It is my opinion, and Chief Berlin concurs, that the traffic enforcement program is more important and will best serve the entire community, than to use the capital improvement money for alterations to the Police facilities. fleEecXfl4 Gud-M. Trot Acting City M nager BMT:mb ember 30, Honorable Members of the City Council William H. Berlin, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Traffic Evaluation:. Additional Motor Officer Honorable Sirs: In reviewing the Traffic Enforcement Program for the past six months, I find myself not only satisfied that our predictions for success were accurate, but that the total program has surpassed my expectations. In a two week review of all statistical data available, plus a review of Court records and patrol activity sheets for the period since July 1, 1970, the Program has proven itself, and placed me in a position to make a specific recommendation. at the end of this report. Although many of the statistics• gathered .indicate a tre- mendous reduction in our traffic accident rate, their value must be considered only as general guidelines -indi-. -'eating the effectiveness of the Program. As we well know, the constant "IF" factor places a limitation on the value of any findings. However, in reviewing the accident ratio statistics in conjunction with other data available, it would appear that our revised program has directly affected the traffic picture in the City of Hermosa Beach._ It is obvious, for instance, that as of the date of this report, there have been no traffic fatalities within the. City limits. A harsh judge might surmise this could not be attributed to our enforcement program. Our non -injury traffic accident rate has declined 14%, while our injury' accident rate for the period had decreased 21.5% over a comparable period in the calendar 1966-1969.' The combination of thereduction in non -injury, injury, and fatal accidents lends evidence to the fact that the program has been effective. Radar checks on major thoroughfares during the months of October and November reveal a reduction of nearly 5 miles per hour in motor speed over a like period in, 1967 when our radar enforcement unit was operative. This, tends to show an increased awareness, within and without the com- munity, of the presence of the enforcement unit. During the six month period since July 1st, 1970, our. motor officers have. issued 2,447 citations in total. During the same period in 1969, a total of 1,831 cita tions were issued by the entire patrol force. In general, the so-called "quality" of the citations increased considerably. For instance, the figure in 1969 included a majority for non -accident related offenses, such as equipment violations and other defects which have been labelled by the Legislature as "Infractions". The.: 1970 figures reveal approximately 92% of the citations issued were for violations which are considered contribu- ting to accident causation.::;, The more serious offenses naturally carry a slightly higher fine. This factor is evidenced in the increase in the Traffic Safety Fund refund to the City from the Court, from the 1969 figure of $21,476.38 to the 1970 figure of $30,382.43, or an increase of $8,906.05. These figures, together with other arrests made by the Traffic Enforcement Unit, also show an increase in the totals returned by the Court for the six month period, as listed in the Clerk's Requisition for Distribution of Funds for the six month segments. Total in 1969 was $75,763.70 and for 1970, $99,126.15, or an increase of $23,462.45. -These latter figures also reflect a sliglit increase in the general Court fine levied, and the total Traffic, .Enforcement Program revision. The obvious question to be raised by a member. of the City Council would be, "What did the additional motor Officer cost the City?" Our cost was $932.50 for., the period, which included: Motorcycle lease: $600.00; Hazard Pay: $210.00; Radio crystals: $79.00; Red lights and siren: $43.50. I should make it perfectlyclear that our program was not directed at a rigid dollar -and -cents enforcement. As you are well aware, during recent reorganization of our Depart- ment, I shifted the Traffic Division supervision to Lt. John W. Jaeger in the Training Division. His specific instructions included the establishment of a well-rounded public relations program with emphasis on public education and the enlistment of the cooperation of our residents in a traffic safety program. Our motor officers, for instance, were the first enlisted. in the "Officer Friendly" program sponsored by the South Bay Daily Breeze, and in fact, spent more time in the Youth Education program than did any other officers in the South Bay area. In addition, our two motor officers spent a combined total of 280 hours working in school programs within the City and the Parks and Recreation Department, and allied public relations programs. This was not the extent of their public relations involvement. The motor officers were instructed to. spend the time necessary with a traffic violator to make him aware of the reason for his citation. This program obviously made the violator less resistive to the receipt of the citation, and drastically reduced the time spent in Court by our enforcement officers. This fact is given credence, for instance, in the 42 drunk driving arrests over the period, in which° only one pled "Plot Guilty"' In other words, I submit a total programthat not only saved the City considerable money in reduced Court time, etc.', but in fact increased revenues while notably reducing serious traffic problems. There is another advantage which has become obvious as the program progresses. The motor officers have taken over accident, investigation •and follow-up, which results in proper follow-through to prosecution and s.uccessful disposition of accident investigations. In the past, patrol officers could not afford the time required for successful disposition"in accident investigations. The Program has obviously freed patrol officers for their more important duties of crime prevention patrol. In summary of the above facts, I can onlyconclude that the trial period of six months has proven the effective- ness and need of a specialized unit. I can see no neces- sity for further evaluation of this program, and I am therefore ready., to make a specific recommendation. RECOMMENDATION. I therefore recommend not only the continuation of the present program, but the expansion of our TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM by the addition of an additional motor officer. at the earliest practical date. The great mobility of the motor officer and our direction toward public coopera- tion should be fortified to increase our capability of further reducing the going traffic problem, both pedes- trian and vehicle, within the City. Respectful ly, uhmi tted, William H. Berlin Chief of Police wcm : ac January 12, 1971 TO: Bud M. Trott, City Manager FROM: Gerald P. Tay/or, City Engineer SUBJECT: Plans and Specifications for the Construction of Main Line Sewers in Pacific Coast Highway between 8th and 3rd. For the City Council meeting of January 19, 1971, I will have Plans and Specifications for the construction of Sewer lines in Pacific Coast Highway between 7th and 3rd. This work is necessary to replace the existing sewer line which is badly deteriorated to the point of being a difficult maintenance problem. The Plan and Specifications will be available for review in the Department of Public Works and I will be at Council meeting to answer any questions. The construction will be funded from the Sewer Maintenance and Construction Fund (fund 0900 It is requested that the City Council approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize a bid opening date of February 11, 1971 at 2:00 p.m. After the bids are received, a recommendation as to award will be submitted to the City Council for their action. Sincerely, 04.1 GERALDCA). TA OR City Engineer GPT:jw 1 NOTICE INVITING BIDS (Cash Contract) PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California up to the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. Thursday February llth, 1971 for sower improvements on Pacific Coast Highway from 3rd Street to Oth Street in Hermosa Beach, California in accordance with Specifications No..Ht 249 and Drawings Numbered HB 72491 through 7249-9 on file in the offices of the City Clerk and City Engineer. Work in general will consist of the renewal of an existing sewer line in Pacific Coast Highway between 3rd to 3th Street or the alternate of abandoning the. existing sewer line and constructing two parallel lines in Pacific Coast High- way between the same limits. All bids Must be sealed and either mailed or delivered so as to be in the hands of the City Clerk on or before the hour stated, at which time in the Council Chamber in the City Hall of said City, all bids or proposals received will be opened, examined and publicly declared by the City Clerk of said City. Copies of said specifications and drawings may be obtained ,frorn the office of the City Engineer, City Hall, City of Hermosa Beach, California. A five dollar ($5.00) deposit is required on each set of plans and; specifications which will be refunded upon return of plans and specifications in good condition within ten (10) days after award of bid. An additional charge of one dollar ($1.00) non-refundable, will be mads for each set of plans and specifications' which is requested to be mailed. In the event of requests for mailing, separate checks should be submitted to the City. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California has heretofore establi.slied a prevailing rate and scale of wages in accordance with law to be -paid in, the construction of the above entitled work. Thesaid rates and scales were adopted by the City Council by motion on 8th day of -October 1970 and the 5th day of January, 1971, and are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City of Hermosa Beach. Each bid must be accompanied by either a certified check or a bid bond for the sum of ten (10) per cent of the total amount of the bid and made payable to the City of Hermosa Beach as a guarantee that the bidder, if his bid is accepted, will enter into an agreement for said work and will furnish good and sufficient bonds for the faithful performance there -of and for the payment of labor and material costs, and for the California State Highway Department, all in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. NOTICE INVITING BIDS All bids and bid bonds shall be submitted upon forms Burnished by the BY ORDER OF the City. Council of the. City of Hermosa Beach, California. MARY A. EDGERTON , CITY CLERK Date AGREEMENT THLS AGREEMENT, made and entered into thi. i .. day of January, 1971, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and CRIFEENHAGEN-KROEGI{R, INCA, management consultants, herein- • after referred to as "Consultants": RECITALS; I. A vacancy has occurred in the positron of City Manager and the City. Council intends to appoint a well qualified individual to fill the vacancy, 2. The City Council has determined that it would,be to the best inter- ests of the City to. utilize the nervines of a Management consulting firm for the purpose of conducting the detailed actions necessary to produce a list of qualified candidatesfrom which .the Council can make its selection, 3. The Consultants have heretofore performed services identical in nature for numerous other cities.and . possesa an acknowledged experience and competence in such matters. NOW, THEREFORE, ft is agreed as follows: 1. Designated members of the City Council and the Consultants will meet for the purpose of discussing the qualifications to be sought in candi- dates for City Manager and to reach a mutual understanding of the Methods and •procedures to be followed in attracting qualified candidates. 2. The Consultants will proceed to .take such other actions as may -be necessary to attract.applicants forthe position of. City Manager in accordance 'ith the understanding reached with the Council 3. The Consultants w:i.11 conduct a detailed evaluation of the personal and.professional qualifications of all applicants and Submit a report con- . taaining summary statements of the five or so prospective candidates most. deserving of .serious consideration for the Council to interview. 4. Upon request of the Mayor, the Consultants will arrange for the prospective candidates to meet with the Council aid .will also meet with rhe Council to discuss the a:andidatea if so requested. 5. Following the aelecti.::n by the`Colincil, the Consultants will pre- pare a letter for the Mayor to sends to a+11 persons applying for the position for the purpose of expretming rppreciation for their interest.in the position, 6. The City agrees to ct aenec e the Consultant's on the basis of $25.00 per hour for actual time expended on behalf of the City, plias reimbursement' for any expenses that might be incurred for travel, long distance telephone calls, and sitnilsr items. .In no event shall the charges for the Consultants' services, inclusive of expenses, exceed an amount. of $3,000, un ass a higher expenditure is authorized in writing by the City Council for services in addition to those•herein set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA By OR FE3 CEN-IC€b OE , INC, By Vice7Frep ident ) • • ORDINANCE NO, W. S. 398 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 19A, "NOISE REGULATION", PROHIBITING EMISSION OR CREATION OF NOISE BEYOND CERTAIN LEVELS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,. DOES ORDAIN »s FOLLOWS' SECTION 1. That Chapter 19A, entitled "Noise Regulation", be and is hereby added to the City Municiprl Code, to read in its entirety as hereinafter set forth "CHAPTER 19A NOISE REGULATION ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Section 19A-Pl. Declaration of policy. It is hereby declared to be the'policy of the City to prohibit unnecessary, exceSaivo, and annoying noises from all sources subject to its-policepowere At certain levels noises are detrimental to the health and welfare of the citizenry and in the public interests shall be systematically.proscribed. Section I9A-2. Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless thecontext otherwise clearly indicates, the words and phrases used are defined as fellows: ' (a) "A" Band level. "A" bandlevelshall mean thetotal sound level of all noise as measured with, a sound level meter using the "A" weighting network. The unit is the dbA. (b) Ambient noise. "Ambient noise" shall mean the a11 -encompassing noise associated with a given environment, usually being a composite of sounds with many sources near and far. (c) Band pressure level. "Band pressure level" of a sound for a specified frequency band shall mean the sound pressure level for the sound contairied within the restricted band. (d) ac21.c. "Cycle" shall mean the complete sequence of values of a periodic quantity which occurs during a period. (e) Decibel. "Decibel" (db) shall mean a unit of level which denotes the ratio between two quantities which are proportional to power; the number of decibels corresponding to the ratio of two amounts- of power is ten times the logarithm to the base ten of this ratio. • "(f). Emergency work. "Emergency work" shall Lap work made neeessary • to restore property to a safe condition following a public calamity or work required to protect,persons or property from an imminent exposure to danger. (g) FE2gRenoy. "Frequency" of a fuction periodic in time shall mean the reciprocal of the primitive period. The unit is the cycle per unit time and shall be specified. (h) microbar. "Microbar" shall mean a unit of pressure commonly used in acoustics and is equal to one dyne per square centimeter. (i) Period. 'Period" of a periodic quantity shall' mean the smallest increment of time for which the function repeats its (j) Periodic quantity. "Periodic quantity' shall mean oscillating quantity, the values of which recur f,or equal increments of time. (k) Person. "Person" shall mean a person, firm, aseociation, copartnership, joint venture, carper;:tion® or any entity, public or private in nature. (1) fiampurAlyARK. "Sound analyzer" shall mean a device measuring the band pressure level or preosur spectrum level of a eciund as a function of frequency, (m) Sound level meter. • "Sound level meter' shall mean an instrument including a Microphone, an amplifier, an output meter,and frequency weighting networks for the measurement of noise and sound levels in a specified manner. (n) §232111212Esipsure level.. °Sound pressure level" in decibels, of a sound shall mean twenty times the log rithm to the base ten of the ratio of the pressure of this sound to the reference pressure', which reference pressure shall.be explicitly stated.• (o) Spectrum. "Spectrum" of a function of time shall mean a description of its resolution into components, each with a different frequency. (p) Motor vehicles. "Motor vehicles" shill Include, but not be limited to, mini -bikes and go-carts.* (q) Sound emilpILEKLEafasi.pment. "Sound amplifyingequipment" uhall mean any machine or device for the amplification of the human voice, music, . or any other sound. "Sound amplifying equipment" shall not include standard automobile radios when used and heard only by theeeccupants of the vehicle in which the automobile, radio is installed. "Sound amplifying equipment" as used in this chapter shall not include warning. devices on authorized emergency vehicles, or horns or other warning Jovices on any vehicle used only for traffic safety purposes. ..egtereeeeeseeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeegeeereeeeeeee;ieeeereeemeexeeeeeeeeeeeefreeepeekee,mree,eeeeeesee-eeeeeee • "(r) Sound truck. "Sound truck" shall mean any motor vehicle, or any other vehicle regardless of motive powr, whether in motion or stationary,. having mounted thereon, or attached thereto, any sound amplifying equipment. (s) gmEtEsLaLkam9Rft. "Commercial purpose" shall mean and include the use, operation, or maintenance of any sound amplifying equipment for the purpose of advertising any business,or any goods, or any services, or for the purpose of attracting the attention of the public to, or advertising for, or soliciting patronageor customers to or for any Performance, show, entertainment, exhibition, event, or for the purpose of demonstrating any such sound equipMent. (t) Noncommercial„Eamegjt. "Noncommercial purpose" shall mean the use, operation, or -maintenance of any sound equipment for .other than a "commercial purpose". "Noncommercial purpose" shall mean and include, but shall not be limited to, philanthropic, political, and charitable purposes. Section.19Ae3. Noise Limits. (1) Maximum Sound Level. The maximum sound level (noise level), at any point on property lines surrounding the premises on 'which the noise is produced by any use or facility shall not exceed the following limits: Zone District or Use Maximum Decibels Sound Level A Al). "R" Zones * 45 All "C" Zones * 55 All "M" Zones * 65 ' Hospitals, convalescent hospitals, rest homes, long term medical or mental care facilities; Schools; in any Zone . 45 * Denotes the first letter in a particular zone district. The 'sound level at the boundary line between zone districte, or a. zone district and a specified use, shall not exceed the average of the maximum permitted sound level for each such district or use noted above. (2). Corrections. The mound level limits must be adjusted by addition to the following corrections:. Correction, Criteria Decibels (a) Steady noise without impulse or prominent' pure tones (such as rain noise) 0 (b) Steady impulsive noise (such as hammerinq or riveting) -5 "Corrections (Continued) Correction, Criteria Decibels (c) Steady audible tone components (such as whine, screech, hum) -5 The following corrections may be applied to the limits and corrections noted above only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. except for specified uses or uses in or adjacent to "R" Zones or specified uses: Criteria Noise occuring 15 mins per hr Noise occuring 5 mins per hr Noise occuring 1 min per hr Measurement. (a) Sound level (noise level) shall be measured with a sound level meter satisfying the specifications of the American National Standard Specifications (S 1.4-1961, as amended) , which has had its acoustic calibration checked within the previous seven days. (b) Measurements shall be made on the nearest property line which faces the noise source, or at any point on, said property line where the noise is greater. (c) Measurements shell be made on the A weighted scale, with fast response, following the manufacturer's instructions. (d) Measurements must be made out of doors with the microphone at a height of not less than four feet above the ground. (e) Care should be taken to avoid readings which are influenced by such extraneous sources as wind, electrical interference, or background (ambient) noise. (f) Noiss level sh..l1 b determined by taking an average of at least three maximum deflections of the pointer. Section 19A-4. Expjapetjalls. None of the provisions of Section 19A-3 herein shall be applied Correction, Decibels + 5 +10 +15 to: (a) Public works which are authorized by the City; (b) Building construction for which a valid building permit has been issued, only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. -4- • • 'ARTICLE 2. SPEC/AL NOISE SOURCES Section 19A-5. Radical television sets and similar devices. (a) Use restricted. It shall be unlawful for any person within any residential zone of the City to use or operate any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, television set. or other machine or devic for the produying or reproducing of sound between the hours of 1000 p.m. of one day and 8:00 a.m. of the following day in such a manner ee to dieturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of neighboring residents or any reasonable peroon of normal seneitiveness residing in the area. () Prima facie. vilglAtion. Any noise exceeding the aribient noise level at the property /in of any property (or, if , dondominium or apartment house, within any adjoining apartment) by more than five decibels shall be deemed to be prima facie evidence of a violation of the provisions of this section. Section 191-6. Hawke s and dlers. It hall h unlawful for any person within the City to sell ee, anything by outcry within any area of the City zoned for residential uses. The provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit the selling by outcry of merchandise, food, and beverages at licensed sporting events, parades, fairs, circumes, and other similar licensed public entertainmentevents. Section 19A-7. Drums. It shall be unlawful for any person to use any drum or other instrument or device of any kind for the purpose of attracting attention by the creation of noise within the City. This section shall not apply to any person who is a participant in a schoolband or duly licensed parade or who has been otherwise duly authorized by the City to engage in such conduct. Section I9A-6. Schools hospitals and churches. It shall be unlawful for any person • to create any noise on any street, sidewalk, or public place adjacent to any school, institution of learning, or church while the same is in use, or adjacent to'any hospital, which noise unreasonably interferes with the workings of such institution or which disturbs or unduly .annpys liatients in the hospital, provided conspicuous signs are displayed in such streets, sidewalk or public place indicating the presence of a school, church or hospital. "Section 19A-9. Animals and fowl. No person shall keep or maintain, or permit the keeping of, upon any prises owned, occupied, or controlled by such person, any animal or fowl otherwise permitted to he kept which, by any sound, cry, or behavior, shall cause annoyance or discomfort to a reasonable person • of normal sensitiveness in any residential neighborhood. Section 19A-10. Machinerxt_pvimilent fans and airconditiarlina. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any machinery, equipment, pump, fan, air-conditioning apparatua, or similar mechanical device in any manner so as to create any noise which would cause the noise level at the property line of any property to exceed the ambient noise level by more than five decibels based on a reference sound pressure of 0.0002 microbars as measured in any octave band center frequency, in cycles per second as follows: 63, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000, and for the combintd frequency bands, "A' band. ARTICLE 3. CONSTRUCTION Section 19A-11. Construc4on of buildings and _ects. It shall be unlawful for any person within a residential zone, or within a radios of 500 feet therefro, to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work on buildings, structures, or projects or to operate any pile driver -en steam shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, steam or electric hoist, or other construction type device between thehour of 7:00 p.m. of one day and 800 a.m. of the next day in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area is cau ed discomfort or annoyance unles beforehand a permit therefor has been duly obtained from the Director of Building and Sf..ty. No permit shall be required to perform emergency work as defined in Article 1 of this chapter. ARTICLE 4. VEHICLES Section 19A-12. Vehicle re2gEgo It shall be unlawful for any person within any residential area of the City to repair, rebuild or test any rotor vehicle between the hours of 6:00 p.m. of one day and 8:00 a.m. of the next day in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in that area is caused discomfort or annoyance. -6- "Section 19A-13. Motor driven vehicles. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any motor driven reasonable person of vehicle within the City in such a manner that a normal sensitiveness rssiding in the area is cau ed discomfort or annoyance; provided, however, that any such vehicle which is operated upon any public highway, street, or right-of-way shall be excluded from the provisiens of this section. ARTICLE 5. AMPLIFIED SOUND Section 19A-14. aumis. The City Council enactS the provisions of this article for the sole purpose of securing and promoting the public .health, comfort, s fety, and welfare for its citizenry. While recognising that the use of sound amplifying.equipment is protected by the Constitutional rights of freedom of speech and assembly, the Council nevertheless feels obligated to reasonably regulate the use of sound amplifying equipment in order to protect the correlative Constitutional rights of the citizens of this community to privacy and freedom frowpsiblic nuisance of loud and unnecessary noise. Section 19A-15. amligation ired. It shall be unlawful. for any person, other than personnel of law entorcementor government agencies, to install, use, or operate within the City a loudspeaker or sound amplifyi g equipment in a fixed or movable position or•mounted.upon any ,sound truck for the purpose of giving instructions, directions, talks, .addresses, lectures, or transmit's) music to any persons or asseMblages of persons in or upon any street, alley, Sidewalk, park, place, or public property without first filing an application and obtaining a permit therefor as set forth in this article. Section 19A-46. Fi1ingt2ppikation. Every user of sound amplifying equipment shall file an application with the License Supervisor for .:pproval by the License Review Board ten days prior to the date on which the sound -amplifying equipment is intended to be used, which application shall be accompanied by a fee of Ten .($10.00) Section 19A-17. Contents91..ison. . The application shall contain the following information: (1) The name, address and telephone number of both the owner and- user'of the sound amplifying equipment; -7- "Contents of .!pplicat.ion (Continued) (2) The maximum sound producing power of the sound amplifying equipment which- shall include the wattage to be used, the volume in decibels of sound which will be produced, and the approximate distance for which- sound will be audible from the sound amplifying equipment; (3) The license and nbtotor 'number if a sound truck -is to be. used; (4) i general description of the sound amplifying equipment which is to be used; and (5) Whether . the sound amplifying equipment, sill be used for commercial or noncommerci£a1 purposes . Section 19A-18. A22roval. ok License keviow Board. The License Review. Board shall approve the application unless the Board finds that; (1) The conditions of this motor vehicle movement are such that, in the opinion of the Board, use of the equipment would constitute a detriment to traffic safety; or (2) The conditions of pedestrian movement are such that, in the opinion of the Board,. use of the.equipment would constitute a detriment to •traffic safety; or (3) The jesuance of the license would be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare; or (4) The issuance of the license will substantially interfere with the peace and quiet of•the neighborhood or the community; or (5) The applicant would violate the provisions •of this Code. or of any other law. Section 19A-19. Conditions of aTRroya.. The License Review Board• may impose such conditions .on the operation to be conducted under the permit as it may deem necessary or proper. Section 19A-20. - Rppl a3 . . Any 'person aggrieved by disapproval of an application may appeal to the Ci ty Council within ten calendar days from the date of notification of decision. 'Such appeal shall adhere to the procedures established in Section 17-29, "Permits", of the City Code. • • "Section 19A-21. Fees. Prior to the issuance of the permit, a fee in the amount of Ten ($10.00) Dollars per day, or any portion thereof, shall be paid to the City, if the loudspeaker or sound amplifying equipment is to be used for commercial purposes. No fee shall be required for the operation of a loudspeaker or sound amplifying equipment for noncommercial purposes. Section 19A-22, MallA&Aons. The commercial and oncommrcial use of sound amplifying equipment shall be subject to the following regulations: (a) Th only &Quit& pe ittit shall be either music or human speech, or both. (b) The operation of/sound amplifying equipment shall occur only between the hour e of 9i00a.m. ,and 9:00 p.m. latch day except on. Sundays and lege/ holidays. No operation of sound 4ellifying equipment for commercial purposes shall be permitted on Sundays or legal holidays. The operation of sound amplifying equipment for noncommercial purposes' on Sundays and legal holidays hall occur only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. (c) No sound eman ting from sound amplifying equipment shall exceed fifteen dbA above the ambient as measured at any property line. (d) Notwithstanding th,A provisions of subsection (c) of this section, sound amplifying equipment shall not be operated within 200 feet of churche9 schools, hospitals, or City or County buildings. (e) In any event, the volume of sound shall be so controlled that it will not be unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring, disturbing, or a nuisance to reasonable personal of norm of audibility. I sensitiveness within the area ARTICLE 6. TRAIN HORNS MID WHISTLES Section 19A-23. Excessive somd_p_ERhibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or sound, or cause to be operated or sounded, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. of one day•and 8:00 a.m. of the next day, train horn or train whistlewhich creates noise in excess of sighty-nine dbA at any place or point 300 feet or more distant from the source of such sound. -9- "ARTICLE J. GENERAL NOISE REGULATIONS Section 19A-24. General neilleeesalgetion. Notwithstanding hny other provision of this chapter, and in addition thereto, it shall 40 unlawful for any person to wilfully make or continue, or cause to be made or continued, any loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise which dieturbe the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or which cases discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in th area. Section 19A-25. Noise standaedi. The standards !Mich hall be con a violation of th provi ions *Y. this secti not be united to the followinges idered in determining whether n exist shall include, but (a) The volume of t noise; • (b) The intensity f the noise; (c) Whether the nature of the noise is unual or unusual; (d) Whether the origin of the noise is natural or unnatural; (e) The volume'and.intensity of the background noise, if any; (f) The proximity of the noise to residential sleeping faeilitiee; (g) The nature and 'zoning of the area within which the noise emanates; (h) The density of the inhabitation of the area within which the noise emanates; (i) The time of the day or night the noise occurs; (j) The duration of the noise; (k) Whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent, or constant; and (1) Whethr the noise is produced by a commercial or noncommerdial activity. AIM= 3. REMEDIES Section 19A-26. yiolationst Misdemeanors. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in an amount not exceeding Five Hundred and No/100ths ($500.00) Dollars or be imprisoned in the City or County Jail for a period not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day such violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. -710- "Section 19A-27. Vioi.ationr Injunctions . As an additional re tedy, the operation or maintenance of any device, instrument, vehicle, or machinery in violation of any provisions of this chapter, which operation or maintenance cau a discomfort or annoyance to reasonable persons of normal sensitiveness or which endangers the comfort, repose, health, or peace of residents in the area shall b;�: deemed, and is declared to be, a public nuisance and ,:ay be subject to abatement summarily by s, restraining order or injunction issued by a court of competent jurisdictions Section 19A-28. gnforeeto The Police Department is hereby designated ted asp the eraforcin agency of this chapter and any tenements thereto. to. Section 19A-29. Severaiaril.aityo .00m If any provision, clause p sentencer, or paragraph of this chapter. or the application thereof to any pereonn or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or appli- cation of .the provisions of tbits chs: pts r which can be given effectwithout the invalid provisions or applications and, to this endo the provisions of this chapter are heresy declared to be severable. Section 19A-30. Esptgg. Any provisionof the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, or appendices thew' -to, or any other orrdinanc F., of the City inconsidtent herewith, to the ext nt of Such inconsistencies, and no further, are hereby repealed; providing® however, that such. repeal :=shall not in any way affect any promecutiaan or action which may be pending in any court for the violation of any provisions or ordinances repealed thereby." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, . or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subcecti n, e ntence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentencese clauses . or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of fifteen days from the passage thereof shall be published at lease once in the Hermosa Beach Review, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1971. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ...e.......�. City Attorney - 51..„ 41 kl MCISA REACO C1V/C CENTF40 .31 vqz CALIrMIA 462S4 PHONE: 3/614464 Honorable Ma'yor. and Members of the City Council Hermosalleach, California De -Camber 30, 1970 Gentlemen: An ordinance concerned with noise regulation is being presented to you at your next regular Council meeting on January 5, 1971. If this ordinance is passedand becomas an effective law, it will be necessary to purchase noring equipment in order that the enforcing agency shali b able to dstormine the maximum ambient noise level. The cost of this meterin9 equi44,ent will amount to approximately $800.00. It would be the writer's recommendation, if the ordinance is adopted, that the City Council authorize an expenditure in the amount of $1000.00 for the purchase of.such equipment. Respectfully, M. Tr Buildisg recto BMT: Alb srmstorperusswerrarert CITY OF inGL wL 00 Dec a or 28 1970 CIVIC CENTER IOr AST tr„ JEEPS STREET A I5 LEWOOC), Honor le Mayor and City Council City of.Herapaa Beach City Hall Hermosa Beach Califo rn ia Gentleman: CaLiFOrnia CALIFORNIA 90301- Ingiewood'a Mayor, Bill. Goediker asked -me: to advise you of the fact that the Federal Aviation. Adxl istration has just, recently asked for public comMent on a proposed rule which would requ e existing aircraft to . be retrofitted with quiet engines. Such a program is perhaps the most significant development in aviation as far as people and communities near airports are concerned. A ten orfifteen decibel noise reduction . in existing aircraft ,mould be a n.ij,' step toward regaining compatibility between communities and airports as d relieving the intense hardships that present day noise levels impose on people living nearby. It holds the promise of being able to do this in a much . shorrterr time span than some of the other propda.raie which have been suggesated for aircraft noise allevi- ation. Therefore, .1 have enclosed a copy of the FAA's request for public cent on this; proposed ru.l.e. I strongly urge you to study it carefully and res gond to the FAA by the deadline date of. January 29th. The'FAA is in a mood to pass a retrofi't regulat en;' the airport operators aro ready to give sugh a measure their full support; and communities much as yours and urs need thisg tegul#.tions, deoperatelypand soon. A, strong ahoa'thg at this time by all .those concerned ie critical if we hope to have this rule adopted. Now is the time to eett 4*/ - Randall I,. ' Tearlburt Acouati.sal Engineer Not Alyitammt Diviti s HIEitdm - Enclosure OFFICE OF J*i.1CJ O. v0i;iiL.S rote (BUILDING OIRECTOR O6:B4F141:aul Or I£U!ILCI G A15 aA!!vETV LOS AP;GE:LES `3/074,71I1 tt Ai'r f"v :11,',•••...••'„•,-',L. • DEPARTMENT OF iiiha ENCATIMI,It. WELFAPir. . Pepe3 find Drug AciminIstredio6 •21 CFR Paul TOLERANCES AND .EXF,MPT161+0 • • FROM TOLERANCES FOR PF;STICIDE (f.',HEM1CALS. IN OR ON RAW kfil•?..., CIILTURAP., Ot/aViODITIMi; • • Doeochicrooetethyclra-1,3,4-Metiteno- 214-CycieboauECD1iPontoten-2-Pne; Propose.d• Tpiertinct, The 'United Fruit Co,, Miami, Ph. 33145, has submitted -request (FP 0E0919) Pursuant to section O(e) of, the Federal Food, Drug, and Co-smeti.4; -Ad, proposing a tolerance of 0.01 part,\ per million for negligible residues of tha• aper dec.schlorooctahydro.-lcSA- petheno-2H-cyclobutatcdlpenta1en one In Or ori bananas. X) ata submitted by the firm show that •( application of 2 ounces of 5 percent'tfust formula- tion applied in o band approximately •S2. 3.nches wide adjacent to each titulars., plantis eigictive. IA the oon1ro oX'7itilk banana root .borer•-(Cosritopolltes ,s•orp, das)4 (2) residues in or en bananas froFo, this nsa would.'nett -eitceed 0,01 part pey million, and (3) ouch residues In tIV,plik bananas would•not be a hazard The U.S. Department 1.40.104to.pir advisei that this inteeticido is Usefuirfcr the purpose of the tolerance. /Based en consideration given the data submitted, and other relevant material. the Commissioner of Food and tints concludes alai; the proposed tolerance is safe and will protect, the Therefore. touratlant to previsions of thio Federal rood, Drug, and Cosmetic 40 • (me. 4.06(e), 68 Mat,: 51.4; 1.7.S.C. 34S Ce)) 'and under authority delegated to the Commissioner (21 CER 2.120) , it is ProPosed that Fart 120 be amended by addinr, a new section as follows: 6 120.287 ' DecItchIcrooclAiyevo.1,11'•„4. taxa/tem-2H eyclebnin t cdlpeoallen- • 2 -one; tolem. nees for residues. ' t °ler-am:6 et 0.01 part per raillion is established for intligibie residues of thc insecticide decaohlerocctaltydrO.-.1.,2,4k tnetheno4.e:pciebutateillpe.ntalen. - ane In in in- on theraw agricultural cein'-;, goodity bananas. ;• Any person Wico has registered oi" who has subeeltted an application for the4t-ii- letration of tui economic poison undor the Federal )1:11sec:tied°, Fuhgteide,•lind Rocienticide Act containing the, sUblect pesticide may .re0.3.est, Within 30 days after publication hereof in . the Psalm1 RaccArza, that the Move proPosal be referred to an advisory conunittee in acl cordance with section 408(e) of the act. .intren'Streia PrAZOOS vi fags after publicatien Icierof 'in the :Foci:atm, REGISTER, file with the Rearing Clerk, Department ,.•••,! :Health, Education. and Welfstro, 5600 Fishers Lane,, )2.-,•.4, 2635k. %mitten cm:km.0'11M •Iprefertibt: quir.ituplicate) relqarding this prepese/,. ZIonuntalts may be aeconi- panie6. men/arena:in or' briefin •nunpoit .. • • . • Aarg, . . . • • Assoexta Coma:4°12er • ,forsComptimace. n•••0$.i,„ Rev, *c WM; u.h14,2 o7rIftt'tkit;'r..' V21:14 ,•4 tea Fecietzri ';J • 7,00t4; Notita AiRPLANE titt`.7)T,SF. 1713.DtriCTION RETRI.,)FiT RECIA9IRVMENI'S., • • Adv'eutce NoPite faret.i6vati ROO. • hieildng . • , Ths Federal Av*tion Administration ConsideriFig rule pu*Ing to establish 21oise....auti1otior4ittivIireineoits tfitit' would Traolve .4:noel/gloat-top (LP., "retrofit") of estirreotlY• trot Certilientg cubsonit.ttir.. 731)fii, engine Paverod airplenea. (‘,Marei••' less', of tac;',egoyyvess 4 )Jt/2 oberaUon Of ,Vote ThIs arlynnee net3sa -of proPMel rule nalginEi smed in-aecerdance l'.410 Adt.-;02111stratica of ?I:34Y •ut tri. act:to:us iv/ate& lo o makki.g. An "aavance" notice: of fi";repeaeilTitle mk'- is IV.Ated NtilVii Fi foniel 'that tato pefouress of the Fedval 44414Son, Ad- Foir.istnNtion dO not yield a s,Billtilerit basia to Identify -and select tentalvo native conr,ses . of action 'Open. Which a, rule Malting procedure rafght bs trgAtaR'- taken. or villein :gt -11m0.0„.•othelvise ‘17e faelpfni..0 invite o.altY'Plablie partrtOiK,- -,tionin•tht•Identlilcation and sclec,ticn, of. imtentatii(c-cetattc.rnatiTe...., =tau (d ,stet40..• • • • • • • 13141n21,0 peraona ink(itect: te•-.3.iar•-• tictinto the; gubji,;:..-t rule Milking pro.O.:. 's by subraitting to dat'Aft•. Tiews.‘er argumentsu,s they may f„Wires• Corainunleations should idtthtify the reg-' • tdittory•dcsket or notice nitinbar and be :•stilnnitt,eC in auggwete c:dera.a. tion •Adthinistratlen, Oran e-.1 Om Gen— eral 17,otutsa, Attention: nules .11n1:et, GC -24, :300 Indepanderice Avenue Washington,..10.C,, 20590. AU conarounion- tionS received on or before January 29. 2971, wilgl lae considered by the Admin- istrator before taking action on the pro - .posed. ruld. Tine concepts contained in th.ls notice may be changed in he light of continents received. All comments sub- mitted will be available, both before, and elixir. the closing date or comments, in • the Rules Docket for examination by in- terested persons. 1. Federal -responsibility or doise re- ft,..,,tion retrofit of aircraft. 'Fecicrai au- rity and responsibility for the moth - o( aircraft for noise purposes has bean prescribed by the Congress in Pub- lic I,wi g0-411,, July 21, 1908. which added seetiez, ..iqq, to the Federal Aviation Acl; e 19513. lbe relationship between Pula - Tic Law fgf-411 (49 EF.S.C. /43.1) and local government initiatives was :specifically oiseassm ;:.r.s, Aollows in Senate Peport ZEIfi% . • i, the intent of the committee in '...iecommentiing this legislation to effect any 'Ichango in the existing apportionmen.t of powers lectreen the Federal and' State and local.govcruzneatz 4 *•* °Th proposed legis- lation will not aciect the /Isms of a State' • 1,hr local public agency, as the proprietor of f11 ni,rport, from issuing regulations or eetab- ing ic-ri lishtiirernents es to the permissible level of noise which can be cre.ated by air- . crest wing the'airppat 0 "• ''.27_1741.11-1._aiiiiiit. • Part owner is,jes,acza.srolo-So• sieeltlin.g_bo.m. o lz.r.147:4_mi__Ktutways....r.111_1§—ee.,.1s_ti:o_ownor fil'aa_miabie......t.0.11:_sibtaining.....racise_e.e.serneitta oroc65wy t,s,..pjavit..theautmting..annialgtp_ix. '..iirlidif1;:raft.. Tho Federal Oovernmexit is .-trifrpPrio.require an airport to accept • Service by larger itrtiraft and. for that war- poSe, to obtain longer runways. Likewise, the 'edoGovernment is In no .positton to ' vequire an airport to -accept service by noisier • klac,raft. and for that purpose to obtain acidi- 12anttl.' taolee easenienta.ne istuLts_ths_,,er.- ..- got cleared be tlji_o_ airnort oemer_and,the stens_ -_ ,Ift Wtiriiiirkgarte.....tp_ottifri 91.1,;_kf.17.1,Oe. ,;(11. -creng iiith•this issue, tife-Viiideral.GoVern- ment ohoulti not substitute. its judgment for ' that el' tbe Ste.tea or elements of local govern- ment who, tor the most part, own arid operate oar Nation's airports. The proposed legisla. tion is not desiguctil C....o this czel 6711! not pre -vane airport proprietors from crieluding any r.alrerat on the basis of noise considera. • tionc.". Of course, the authority of 'units of • local government to control the' eficcts of ' aircraft noise through the 6.1:Preis° o1 land Ilse planning and zoning_ powerg. .fr; not dirnintalicAl hy the bill., • • •• . . PloWeveir, with respect totile intended effect .c.f. Public Law .90-411 on the clu- ;rent fleet of'aircraft the Senate Commit- t,ao. on Commerce a)'so stated that: •Tvlay Mere: afe fi2anY thousands .or • iirsvt* tvl'Oelta have been in service a short (Imo • anhave many years of tzleful• life ahead o : horn.'llany of these (aircraft are noisy and. • should It beerime feasible to make then less thisshould be clone. For this reason, the' ball emits authority to resntre retrofit: - ME of Wilma:ft already certificated. Opera- tive aircraft can be modified to accommodate newly developed safety improvements. Per. !saps.. they can also 1. -re modified to Meorpo- 'rats Vne latest practicable noise suppressing* eivikenent. Industry representatives havo IIEG15E1i, VOL. 3,5, no. 215:-.--VIEDWI.D/yr, flOVEMBEV. 14; .11916' objected to the retrofit feature. As we under- stand their opposition, it stems from the fear of having noise requirements imposed without regard to the economic impact of the modifications on. air carriers and other aircraft owners, or in derogation of the high- est safety practices. The Committee appre- ciates this concern but believes that the safe- guards built into the bill are adequate o 6 Aircraft owners and operators will be pro- tected against precipitious or unsound ac- . tions of the Administrator in two ways. The administrative process of developing stand- ards, rules, and regulations will afford in- terested parties, including owners and op- erators, the opportunity to make their views known. Moreover, there are precise guide- lines spelled out in section 611(b) which must be followed before the Administrator may act, Be Ls specifically required to con - eider all relevant data, including the results of any research, development, testing, and evaluation activities, and to consult with appropriate Federal, State, and interstate agencies. fie must also consider whether any proposed regulation or standard is•con- sistent with the highest degree of safety, Is economically reasonable and is technolog- ically practicable. The Administrator's order, based on these considerations, is then sub- ject to complete review by the National Transportation Safety Board. A party ag- grieved by the results of this administrative process then has access to the courts for a judicial review. In the light of the above, it is clear that any action to require that the air- lines equip their aircraft with noise sup- pressors must come from the statutory basis of Federal responsibility, not only with respect to the precise substantive guidelines that the Administrator must follow in rule making, but also with re- spect to the • carefully framed procedural safeguards haat are intended by the Con- gress to protect the regulated person from precipitous and unsound action. Accordingly, control over the acous- tical modification of aircraft must be exercised by the Federal Aviation Ad- ministration, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, in order to insure that noise reduction retrofit regulations (1) consider and apply acous- tical knowledge gained from research and development performed by Govern- ment and private industry; (2) apply in a uniform, coordinated manner the input of Federal, State, and interstate agen- cies, as well as comments from the pub- lic generally; (3) insure that a single certification process is applied that fa consistent with the highest degree of safety in air commerce or air transporta- tion in the public interest; and (4) are economically reasonable, technologically practicable, and appropriate for the par- ticular type of aircraft, aircraft engine, or appliance to which they apply. IIII. The need for aircraft noise reduc- tion retrofit: two aspects. The noise gen- erated by the current fleet of aircraft requires corrective action by the FAA for two reasons: The first reason Is the obvious public need for relief. It was the noise of the current fleet of aircraft that, in large part, led to the enactment of Public Law 90-411 and with respect to which the public need for protection is clearly the most urgent. The near-total noise satu- ration of hundreds of airport neighbor- hoods has been well documented and • `i' yOF`OSir yi kvr k ii`:.-adN6s.:' • 1698i :reds no further elaboration other than Se restate the FAA's commitment to us- tag every legal regulatorytechnique at its disposal to reduce the noise impact of Krait through source noise reduction. The second reason for an aggressive wise. reduction retrofit program is that he noise of the current fleet of aircraft Is a deterrent to the development of new airports, the extension of existing run- ways, and the continued full use of the airport system in the United States. The Airport system Is a vital national asset, and its health directly affects the health lef the entire air transportation system. ,lhe FAA, therefore, regards an effective noise reduction retrofit regulatenterinee !gram as being necess y_,jnel e_bs d :fiai"b- ri c anal la.tioiial interes not only pause of the relief -it will bring to 3r - port neighbors hail, nPal >•+t3ankin-.l l ,au "Uiie, National Environmental ey 7ine of 1- .li.; .Msale , because aircraft 3p:14S0 redycti mt.rofi�ioSiacrile j calsaileeilrkhea nremoti _,_„nn enaallr- spment. a.nd de_v.elopment.nt civil. mengeautles. t In summary, aircraft noise reduction. retrofit cannot be viewed apart from the (total environmental and aeronautical �onsibilities of the FAA, III. Current status. The psimaly *b- allades to the achievement of real relief for airport neighbors are the hard fac- tors that control noise reduction tech-• nology and , air transportation eco- nomies. This is most acutely true in the ens of noise reduction through retrofit, sines the economies of fleet Modification mswt be considered. The first step in controlling the noise of the current fleet of aircraft has al - seedy been taken and is now law. This Involves the "acoustical cheese" require - snit of Part 38 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, which became effective on December I, 1989. Under this require- ment (I 36.1(c) ), no transport category or turbojet engine powered airplane that =needs the noise limits specific -d in Fart 3(i for new type designs may be modified tea hricrease its noise over that of the par- ent airplane. This policy has been vigor- oursly applied since it is clear that the sea essful stopping of the escalation of liege*, in addition to being necessary in Its own right under Public Law 90-411, is gam an essential foundation for 'the equitable application of positive noise reduction requirements through retrofit: Clearly no operator should be required to apply a noise reduction modification that can legally be nullified by modifica- tions faca- ti€ona of the same aircraft that increase. its noisy. In short, the current "acoustical change" requirements of Park 36 are vital' 'to later effective retrofit: regulations and will continue to be vigorously ap- plied to the current fleet of aircraft. In addition, amendments to the current "acoustical change" requirements are now being' considered that would further define and control the method of show- ing that no noise increase at the noisy source in fact results from sirdr ft, growth or other modification. The second step in controlling the noise of the current fleet of aircraft In- volves research and development to change the state of the art relative to the hard economic and technological factors now limiting the noise reduction possibilities. These factors arc basic to the technology of the turbine engine it- self as a propulsion unit, and to. the physical limitations of materials. For example, the high energy low frequency noise or roar of turbine engines is so fundamental to turbojet engine opera- tion that It has been called the "jet floor." Substantial reduction of this noise source is not within the current state of the art; however, some reduction is deemed possible. In addition, the diffi- culty in reducing the noise of the "jet floor" is an obstacle to the achievement of overall noise reduction by attacking the other noise sources within a turbine engine installation, such as compressor whine. The reduction of the compressor whine would be of no public value if thee elimination of that noise source is not perceivable because of the continuing "jet floor" noise. Much research has, therefore, been. done to define and control all of the noise sources in a turbine engine installation. This has included studies on potential noise reduction from the JT3D turbofan engine. This study, initiated by the Na- tional Aeronautics and. Space Admin- istration (NASA) in September 1966, in conjunction with Boeing and Douglas, finally concluded in October 1969, that substantial noise attenuation results on approach were possible for Douglas DC -8 and Boeing 707 modifications. Attenua- tions in approach noise in the Order of 10.5 EPNdB and 15.5 EPNdB were at- tained in this stufy for the Douglas DC -8 and Boeing 707, respectively. While in- stalled hardware, flight information, and definition in the state of the +al't of en-. gine nacelle treatment modification was obtained for the JT3D engine, the pro- gram's primary value was the demon- stration that the basic concepts of sound absorption developed in various labora- tories were valid for aircraft in Sight. Thus, the hardware developed was de- signed mainly for acoustical properties and was not intended to be flight weight nor 'airworthy from. a certification or maintenance standpoint. This hardware was fabricated of relatively new mate- rials (fiber metallurgy and polymide glass reinforced plastics) for which there was very little fabrication and mechanical property experience for use as critical components in aircraft.' This program provided a valuable impetus to the de- velopment of sound absorption treat- ment technology. Research done under that program and substantiated in other laboratories indicated that some fairly common materials, for which structural and fabrication experience exist, might provide significant acoustical improve- ment. However, this program did not develop a modification design or hard- ware of certification quality or that could meet the requirements of economic rea- sonableness or technological practicabil- , sty. Furthermore, this program did not include the development of acoustical modifications for the JT8-D engine which is in wide use in the current fleet. Therefore, further research is planned FEDERAL REGISTEh., VOL 35, NO. 315—WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER' 4, 1970 • • 15082 to develop noiseE reduction design tech- niques for JT8-E) powered airplanes. • Subsequent to the enactment of Pub- lic Law 90-411, the FAA contracted with the Mohr Corp. for a program to provide acoustic nacelle design' rand an economic study on noise abatement retrofit for aircraft powered by .7T3D and .r.a ilD turbofan engines. This study considered six basic aircraft configurations includ- ing all cotnmonly used aircraft powered by the JT3D anti JT8D, • four optimum cost-effectiveness .design conx`igurations, and three classes of sound absorption materials. This re:suited in a matrix of 72, different noise abatement configurations requiring preliminary hardware designs, noise estimates, cos„ analyses, and the economic impact on the aircraft toper ta- tor, including direct operating costs and return on investment. The above men- tioned NASA Boeing/Douglas program provided a valuable basis for this inter study, which indicates a high potential for satisfactory retrofit with the use o%' simplified acoustical treatment that • should achieve significant noise x+educ" tion at a reasonable cost. However. this was an analytical investigation only, No hardware was developed during this study. Further programs are necessary to determine that materials end designs, exist that meet airworthiness certifica- tion requirements and also are economi- cally reasonable and technologically practicable on a fleet -wide basis. In addition to the above, fundamental work is being done .by NASA to cbange the basic nature of the turbofan engine to achieve marked noise reductions. This program is called the "Experimental Quiet Engine Programa" and its objective is the development, from the first age of design, of an experimental turbofan engine haavIng low noise production as the primary configurational constraint, The FAA has received some public com- ment that assumed that a "quiet engine" has already been perfected under this program and that Immediate retrain!: of the fleet .with that engine is now ap- propriate. This is not• the case. The NASA "quiet engine" program's objec- tives include (1) demonstration of the technology and the design Innovations that are necessary to reduce noise, (fs) determination Of the noise levels pro- duced by turbofan engines designed for low noise .output and confirmation that predicted noise reductions can be achieved, and (3) acquisition of experi- mental acoustic and aerodynamic data for high bypass turbofan engine; de- signed for low noise output, to provide a basis for correlation of acoustic theory and experiment, and to provide better understanding of the noise production mechanisms in fans, compressors, tur- bines, and exhaust jets. This does. not include development of a certifiable engine. The NASA and Rohr. studies included . preliminary analyses of the probable economic impact of acoustical modiira tions • on the operation of the aircraft.. The FAA intends to refer to these eco- nomic analyses, together with economic analyses submitted in response to this notice, in order to arrive at an economi- PR P 5ED. ROLE MM1(iNG catty rational basis for proceeding with an NPitaal and would .welcome comment by interested persons: concerning the substance of these reports. in summary, research and develop- ment done to date has demonstrated that the basic concepts .pf noise suppression of turbofan engines are valid acousti- cally, and that materials and fabrication technologies may b developed to trans- late these coticepts into hardware that could provide' economically reasonable and technologically practicable means of significantly reducing the noise gener- ated by certain .currently certificated turbofan engine powered airplanes., Pubric comment requested. As in- dicated above, the current phase of the FAA's noise retrofit program involves (i!) translating the general 'conclusions of retrofit research and development into hardware and design modifications that are capable of being fully air Iver thy from a, certification and maintenance stand- point; (2) deterntiniug that acoustical reodhleations•eair be applied in a manner that is econoanicaily reasonable; and (31} insuring the?,fi this waifl provide a signifi- cant improvement In the noin,re environ- ment torn 'file airport neighbors. These' obJectives introduce the following prob- lem areas in which broad public partici- ,tion and assistance Is requested. • 1. 'The !means by which operators, in eluding foreign aper B torn, rshotnld be regulated avith respect to• the moditica e tion. 'Under one possible alternative, a complete atcoustical "fair" or modification would be prescrib'ec1, or referred to, as in an airworthiness directive, together. ''with all modification details necessary to ' - cure the safety a the fiustallation. is alternative might provide for some use of alternate means of compliance bg the operator, but Would provide tha oliarator with a clear means of caanpliance. tinder another possible alternative, no precise design change would be prescribed. Rather, the operator would be required only to achieve a specified acoustical ob- Jt ctive, either in terms of a rtirescribedi noise reduction or an absolute noise level. The means of eorrnpliance would be left with the operator and would not be aped- fled.. This alterative, to he successful, would regaxtre a general ' availability of acoustical and materials knowledge and technology. Thio alternative would have the esositii'e value of permitting the maximum freedom in the development of means` of reducing noise, and. might thus be more effective than. the alternative mentioned above. 2: The extent to which aircraft op- erators .could assess the economic impact or welt() acoustiea;1 mo1ifiration re- quirements on their operation of the affected aircraft, includifase considera- tion's related to weight, perforrnanee; op- erational factors, deprec£atigra, schedules, maintenance, fuel, and•insurance costs, direct operating costs (including ground costs) , and return on investment. S. 7.'he'criterta that should be applied in determining whether a given economle. effect is reasonable. ills issue requires pubiie comment With respect to the amount of noise reduction necessary to provide meaningful relief to the affected • public. This assessment of economic and public relief factors, to determine whether an economic penalty should be Imposed by regulation, and the deter- mination of how great that penalty must be, are among. the most difficult judg- ments to be made under Public Law 90- 411, and are of particular importance under a retrofit program in which air- craft may be taken out of service or bur- dened with costs that were not factored into the original design and purchasing decisions concerning those aircraft. 4. The extent to •which the current fleet of aircraft should be divided into Classes, types, or other groups, for noise reduction retrofit purposes, to insure that the maximum noise reduction from the fleet is achieved and to• insure that retro- fit regulations are economically reason- able and technologically practicable. 6. The•compllance times that should be applied in a noise reduction retrofit regulation. 6. The extent to which economic in- centives might be applied to increase the amount of noise reduction that could bo accomplished. 7. Possible ffaesh areas of addition:al studies that may have been overlooked and may give effective support to a noise retrofit program. 8. The extent to which subsidiary rule changes may be necessary with respect to the performance and approval of acoustical modifications as alterations to aircraft, and with respect• to the main tenance of side modification. Any retro- fit rule would, of course, assumethdt the materials and technology necessary to accompI sh the aircraft modification are aliailabie to the regulated person: How- ever, the rules governing the performance and approval of aircraft modifications (such as Part 43—Maintenance, Preven- tive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Al- teration, Part 65—Certification: Airmen. other than flight crewmembers, and Part 145—Repair Stations) . are safety ori- ented. Current performance standards do not exist that specifically regulate the ability of maintenance airmen or repair stations to evaluate acoustical media cations for other than airworthiness. 9. 'The exert to which current re- search and development could .be applied to pure turbojet engines. • In order to facilitate public comments regarding the issues raised in this No- tice, • the following documents will be available for.inspectlon at the Office of Noise Abatement, Federal Aviation Ade ministration. Department of Transporta- tion; 800 independence Avenue FW., Washing•ton,, D.C. 20590. 1. Part 36 --Noise Standards: Aircraft Type Certification, Amendment -to Fed- eral Aviation Regulations, Issued 3 No- vember 1969. • 2. Public Law. 90-411, dated 21 July 1968, Amendment to Federal Aviation Act - of 1958 by. addition of section 611—Con- trol and Abatement of Aircraft Noise and Sonic Boom.. 3. Senate Report No.1353, dated 1 July .1968—Aircraft Noise Abatement. 4. House of'Representatives Report No. 1463, dated 23 May 1968—Aircraft•Noise • Abatement. . FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL, 33, NO. 215—WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1970 • 4. 5. NASA SP -2201 issued 15 October 1969—NASA AcousticallyTreated Nacelle Program. 0. Rohr Report (FAA -NO -70-11) dated July 1970 --Economic Impact of Ianplementing Acoustically Treated Na- celle and Duct Configuration Applicable to Low Bypass Turbofan Engines. Copies of these documents may be ob- tained from the following sources: Documents 1. and 2.—PAA, 890 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, D.C. 2051)0—At- tention: NO -1 --no cost. Documents 3. and 4.—House or Senate Docu- ment Room (as appropriate)—U.8. Capi- tol, Washington, D.C. 20590—no cost. Documents 5. and O. --Clearinghouse for Fed- eral, Scientific, and Technical Information, 17.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151—cost $S. This advance notice of proposed rule making is issued under the authority of sections 313(a), 601, 603, and 611 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C, 1354, 1421, 1423, and 1431). Sections 2 (b) (2) and 6(c) of the Departtitent of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1651(b) (2) and 1655(c) ), Title 1 or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Pub - lie Law 91-190, January 1, 1970)., and Executive Order 11514 (Protection and Enhancement of Environmental Quality, March 5, 1970). Issued in Washington, D.C., on Octn, ber 30, 1970. • J. H. SnerreR, Administratcrr, L '.R, Doc. 70-14821; Filed, Oat. W. 1070; 8:52 p.m.' Hazardous Materials Regulations Board ' t". 49 CFR Fart l2'4 [Docket Na EIM-03; Notice No. 70-201 TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Tank Car Specifiicallons Correction . in F.R. Doc. 70-14545 appearing at page 16741 in the issue for Thursday, October 29, 1970, the eighth line of the Mist complete paragraph, column 1, on page 16742 should read "such service. NO further requests to". FEDERAL CiiEUNICATIO S. r 47 CFR Part T33 [Docket No.19074; ;FCa 70-1102j TABLE 01 ASSIGNMENTS, FM BROADCAST STATIONS Notice of Proposed Rule Making In the matter of amendment of 73.202(b), Table of Assignments, FM Broadcast Stations (Greenville, Ey.; Burnside, Greensburg, and Jalnestovm, Ky.; Oak Ridge and Jamestown, Tenn., Pineville, Barbourville, and Middlesboro, PROPOSED RULE MAKING Ky., and Big Stone Gap, 'aa.), Docket No. 19074, ThM-1390. RM -1427, RM - 1436, RM --1581, ' 1. Notice of proposed. rule snaking is hereby given concerning various propos- als to amend the Flt fable of Assign- ments (§ 13202(b) of the rules) with respect to various places in Kentucky, Tennessee, and southwestern Virginia. One of the proposal$ (RM -1390, Burn- side, Ky.) was formerly included in Docket 1847E but'was removed from that proceeding in the decision adopted to- day; others were advanced as counter- proposals in thet.proceeding; and others center around' a proposal to add Chan- nel 2610 as a second assignment at Oak Ridge, Tenn:. (which 'was formerly, *hut is no longer, related to the Docket 18476 proceeding). E'esentially, this proceeding has three separate parts: (1) The assign- ment of Channel, 288A as a replacement at Greenville, K,pnwhere Channel 292A Is being deleted in todssft decision in Docket 18476; (2) the assignment of Channel 276i'., as 'a first assignment at Greensburg, Ky., which would require a station at Jamestown, Ky., • to change channel and 'also mean denial of the petition (RAfi-1390) for an assignment at Burnside, Ky.; a and (3) assignment of Channel 2620 at Oak ltfclge (RM4436) requiring a substitution of either Chan- nel 228A er Cbaxmel 292A.+at Pineville, Ky., for 261li new signed there (or else an assignment at nearby Barbour- ville) The proposed substitutions con- flict respectively'wittal petitions seeking Channel' 228.8 as a first assignment at Rig Stone Cap, Na., and Channel 292A • is a second assignment at Middlesboro, 7y, (RM 142'x' and 1581). The Oak Ridge proposal also involves €s; change of channel and operating station at James- town, Tenn.. - tt 2. Assignrn. ob' Cisasrtsset; 2it8A at Greenv.3llc, Ify,e. Docket 18476 deci- sion adopted today removes Channel 292A as the only assignment at Green- ville, Ky. The petitioners in Rad -1378. whose proposal for other uses of that channel was essentially adopted, urged in their . coxnraents that Channel 288A could be substituted. An opposing party. Who recently applied for Channel 292A at Greenville, urged that Channel 288A could not suitably be used there, because the site would have to be over 7 miles from the city to meet lnii0340 separa- tions; and allegedly problems were there- fore presented concerning whether a suitable site could be obtained, provid- ing the signal over the city required by the rules, and the economic feasibility of constructing the tall tower •which would be required,' • The second report and order in Docket 1$470, adopted today .(FCC 70-1101), in- cludes the following actions bearing on this proceeding: (1) Deletion of Channel 292A From. Greenville, Ky., so that it could be ms. signed in other place.; and (2) denial of 17.M-14.14, requesting asslgrnnent of another channel at Greensburg, Ky., since the chan- nel requested would have conflicted with the assignments In' Kentucky adopted in that decision. The RAs -1414. proposalalsp conflicted with tae Oalc maga 'amnesia. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 35, V49. 215 --WEDNESDAY, 16983 • 3. It appears appropriate to find a re- placement channel for Greenville, pop- ulation 3,198 and a county seat' which has no local AM outlet and has now lost the opportunity for Channel 292A to be used there. We therefore invite com- ments on whether Channel 283A is in fact usable and should be assigned there, or Whether there is another alternative. The assigntnent is proposed herein. 4. Greensburg, Burnside, and James- town, Ky. In RM 1414, petitioners Vir- gil A. Price and E. J. Milby sought the assignment of Channel 261A at Greens- burg. This conflicted with the use of that channel at Elizabethtown, Ky., an iute- graI part of the RM -1378 proposal adopt- ed in today's decision, as a replacement for Channel 292A which was proposed for deletion there and on which a sta- tion is operating. Today's Docket 18476 decision accordingly denies RM -1414 as ' such (see the second 'report and order in Docket 18476, paragraph 12 (b) ) . How- ever, we recognize the merit in making a first assignment at Greensburg, popu- lation 2,834 and the county scat of and largest community .in Green County, population 11,249. While petitioners have an application pending for a daytime AM station, there is now no broadcast outlet in the county and, even if the AM appli- eation is ultimately granted, this FM assignment, would provide opportunity • for a first local fuiltime service thereini. 5. The petitioners in RM -1378 ad- vanced as an alternative Channel 276A for Greensburg, and this appears feasible (it would have to be used 1 mile or more northeast of the city). Accordingly, in view of the merit of making an assign- ment at Greensburg, and the indicated demand for it, It is, proposed herein, despite •the problems mentioned in the next paragraph. 6. Assignment of this channel to +reensburg would require operating Station WJES-FM, now on that chan- nel at Jamestown, Thy., to change fre- quency. Jamestown is some 30 miles from Greensburg. The petitioners in .RM - 1378 proposed that Channel 285A be sub-' etituted there for Channel '276A. This, in turn, would require denial of the pro- posal in RM -1300, for use of Channel. 285A as a first assignment at Burnside. Ky. In paragraph 31 of the initial notice of proposed rule making in Docket 18476 we discussed this proposal and expressed reservations as to its merit, since Burn- side had a 1960 Census population of only 672 persons and is only about '1 miles from the larger city of Somerset, the. county seat, with two AM stations (daytime and Class IV) and one Class A FM station. We pointed out that the channel appeared more appropriate for arse at other, larger communities within the general area: The petitioner, Leon Jasper, advanced in his comments argu- rnents as to why the assignment should nonetheless be made, including the con- tention that a number of smaller nearby connnnnmities are regarded as part of Burnside, and that the city is close to 'Population figures herein are from the 1000 U.S. Census unless otherwise indicated OVEMSER 4, 1970 • ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 3•)9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19, "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TAFFIC", ARTICLE I, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 19-12.1, "CAMPING OR SLEEPING IN VEHICLES ON PUBLIC STREETS OR PARKING LOTS". THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That Chapter 19, 'Motor Vehicles and Traffic", Article I of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach shall and is hereby amended by adding thereto the following section, to read as follow "Section 19-12.1. Camping or sleeping in vehicles on public streets or public parking lots. No person shall at a y time camp or sleep in any vehicle parked upon any public street, alley or passageway or any public parking lot in this city." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY // Jarat.nry 12f 1971 TOE Beg Ern nye City Wagger IN. , chide of Pale* TI 'i C:' `4 Watakipl Code relating pa^ecaazs sleeping in veticles. WS 399 Sir: Din t incre ging =mbar persons'within this City, Ca4GT not hewing ,r, r m. e:eaat; address end a place to reside, or Personas visiting wiiitin die: Citi which results in their sleep- ing in vehicles, it is becoming a: rees 'g problesn.. .Thin ceraglitema is creatlng probta a as both fr nt% a. ponce view,poiat ued front semittry co condititams, along wi ..producing 4t3 el [mats to the City and/or to residents, wherein these isadtvidsals sere "taking up sesni-perFtosnent residence in eir ve u', des", tis creating probReagxas in general for the t ved vicinity o the City at large. r ibrob f; is our Tectimmemi ra that Ordinance peel for the betterment oft ,a co city wad its 1 .19 e'iameo IZespeotZully WILLJA.M Ho BEELL11,3 Mel of Police • ORDINANCE NO. N. S. 400 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEP(a, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTEP 1431, "HEALTH", SECTION 141/2-1, "ADOPTION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH CODE", OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND REVISIONS TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 7583 REGARDING WELL STANDARDS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA.BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 14h, Section 141/2-1 of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach shall be and is hereby amended by adding thereto the follOwing.paragraph .to read as follows: ".The City of Hermosa Beach hereby incorporates Los Angeles County Ordinance No. 10075, as adopted by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on September 1, 1970 and which amends and revises County Ordinance No. 785, the Los Angeles County Public Health Code, said amendment establishing standards of maintenance, abandonment.and destruction of water wells, and of electrode wells, including, but not limited to, cathodic protection wells and grounding rod wells." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this • ATTEST: PRESIDENT of t'he'City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY • CENTRAL AND WEST BASIN WAT REPLENISEITASNIT DISTRICT 7.4811 EAST runeezetric AVENUE DowNET, CALIFORNIA S00410 Totaricorna 987.26111 . 773.5700 November 18, 1970 To: Cities In Central and West Basins Re: Water We l l Standards DD:BCAOvt LLOYD C. LaDDOM. PD86xDA110T CTITARldiel D. DAMMER r CSDCP-BM'ADV D. 9T. Mee MOW. *DtscADVIXAD ROOOM&r L. DADDY ACED A. MD S= OARS veil 7L/SRft. axeA7!ARAr, DeAKAagw The Water Replenishment District Is engaged in a -continuing effort to protect the quality and purity of our underground water supply. For this reason, we invite your attention to Resolution 19o. 70-17 adopted by California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, on February 11, 1970. Resolution No. 70-17, declares. thef Water Well and Cathodic Protection Well Standards are needed in Central and West Basins, and that the basis for such standards Is set forth in Bulletins 74, 107, 74-4 published by the Department of Water Resources. The resolution further recites provisions of California Water Code Section 13803, which requires that the County and each affected city adopt an Ordinance (within 180 days) establishing such standards. We are Infornned that citl $ desiring to do so may satisfy the requirements of Resolution No. 70-17 through the adoption by r_ ference of Los Angeles County Pub l i . H; a I th C•:de Ordinance 7383 (eats oa, nde -..asa;d rev4::04.. ''11aplt I007”e Edwin Le Schu.l onbu rg at the County Health th Dep z rtt = et, Telephone 623-321 2, can be helpful In this regard. W are aware that i, number of Centra 1 and West Basin n cities have adopted the necessary. ord i naece; however, It appears that others may be remiss 1e this respect. We are hopeful that all cities' will soon establish W ;1 1 Standards in the Interest -of providing a higher degree of protection for our common ground ranter ..supply. /e' / Carl `Fossette Genera 1 Manager CF:mer RESOLUTION NO. N. S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 2435, AS AMENDED, ADDING CERTAIN NO STOPPING ZONES AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. N. S. 2435, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by adding certain subsections to Section 5, "No Stopping Zones": Section 5.1 Aviation, Pacific Coast Highway to 60 feet east, south side only. Section 5.1a Aviation, east City limits boundary to'127 feet west of Prospect, north side only. Section 5.82b Pacific Coast Highway, 15th Street to Pier Avenue, west side only. Section 5.82c Pacific Coast Highway 9th Street to 10th Street, east side only. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this „ ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1971 PRESIDENT of the City Council, and _1YOi; of, the City of IIerrnosa 'yea.ch California CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. N. S. )0g1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA„ AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N,, S. 2435, AS AMENDED, DELETING AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN NO PARKING AREAS AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. N.S. 2435, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by deleting the following subsection to Section 4, "No Parking Areas": Section 4.99 Shakespeare Drive, Thirty-fifth Street to 29th Street east Side only. SECTION 2. That Resolution No. N. S. 2435, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by adding the following subsections to Section 4, "No Parking Areas Section 4.99a Shakespeare Drive, 35th Street to 29th Street both sides. ATTEST: Section 4.26c 8th Place, Pacific Coast Highway to 30 feet east, north side only° PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 1971 PRESIDENT Of the City Council, and :t4AYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 11( E t; MCC01181"S511!11MASR"t> i HOLIDAY 7'r"fids 111111111M1I1801111801 CL S Li 11 IL& Cercus, Stats:, Laeel Offices Pestoffice Courts, Offices Drinks New Year's Day, Jon. 1, 1971, Friday Closed Closed Closed Closed Lincoln's Birthday, Feb. 12, 1971, Friday Open 7pen Closed Open Washington's Birthday, Feb: 15, 1971, Monday Closed Closed Closed Closed Memorial Day, May 31, 1971, Monday Closed Closed Closed Closed Independence Day, Monday, July 5 July 4, 1971, Sunday Closed Closed Closed Closed Labor Day, Sept. 6, 1971, Monday Closed Closed Closed Closed Admission Day, Sept. 9, 1971, Thursday Open Open Closed Closed Columbus Day, Oct. 11, 1971, Monday Closed Closed Closed Open Veterans' Day, Oct. 25, 1971, Monday Closed Closed Closed Open Thanksgiving, Nov. 25, 1971, Thursday Closed Closed Closed Closed Christmas, Dec. 25, 1971, Saturday Closed Closed Closed Closed The Federal Monday Holiday Low (Public Law 90-363) enacted in 1968, goes into effect on Jan. 1,, 1971, arm, provides for at least five three-day weekends each year. Undo the federal law, Washing- ton's Birthday will be observed on the third Monday of February; Memorial Day on the last Monday in May; Labor Day on the first Monday in September; Columbus Day on the second Monday in October, and Veterans' Day on the fourth Monday in October. Unchanged are New Year's Day (Jan. 1), Independence Day (July 4), Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November) and Christmas Day (Dec. 25). IGh11INIIIIIIMIMMIN11111111P1111;R1t11 !171111111101111111111!01111111EZIMII?!!!tau"�i EN!TI!?NII?H!IIIIIII!IAM1i7d1, d :i. !II Reprinted from METROPOLITAN NEWS, lesue of December 2, 1270 • RESOLUTION NO..N. 8 2 ,t)g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH; CALIFORNIA, AM2NDING RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 29730 KNOWN AS THE "CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY RESOLUTION", ADOPTED JANUARY 3# 1968o BY REVISING SECTION 19(a), "HOLIDAYS - REGULAR EMPLOYEES". WHEREAS, the Federal Monday Holiday Law (Public Law 90- 363) enacted in 1968 goes into effect on January 1, 1971, and provides for at least five three-day weekends each year, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 19(a), "Holidays - Ragular Employees" of Resolution No. N. S. 2973 be revised to read as follows: "SECTION 19. galidayE. (a) Becular Balm (1) With the exceptions hereinafter stated, holidays for all officers and employees of the public offices of the City of Hermosa Beach shall be January 1st; February 12th, known as "Lincoln Day"; the third Monday in February, known as "Washington Day"; the last Monday in May, known as "Memorial Day"; July 4th; the first Monday in September; September 9th, known as "Admission Day"; the fourth Monday in October, known as "Veterans Day"; Thanksgiving Day and the Friday following Thanksgiving Day; December 25th; Good Friday from 1200 Noon until 300 p.m.; and every day appointed by the President or Governor for a public fast, thanksgiving or holiday; provided that on any day appointed by the President or the Governor as a special or limited holiday& City offices shall function in their normal and usual manner and all other public functions shall be performed as on days which are not holidays. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: , 1971. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY COPY CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA 415 Diamond Street P. O. Box 270 Mr. J. B. Mirassou, City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach City Hall Hermosa Beach, C-lifornia Dear Bud: Department of Property Management Telephone FR 2-1171 January 12, 1971 HERONDO STREET - MONTEREY STREET PROJECT #809 Per the acquisition agreement between Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach covering acquisition of Parcels A, Bp C, D, on the northeast corner of Monterey and Herondo, we are in the final stages of negotiation to purchase. Negotiations may or may not be successful on all or a part of the required property and therefore in the interest of time, I recommend that authorization be requested from the Hermosa Beach City Council to proceed with condemnation with request for an order of immediate possession on all or any one of the parcels if negotiation for purchase is not successful by January 22•, 1971. Gerald Taylor, your acting City Engineer, concurs with this time- saving procedure in the event negotiation falters or the property owner simply wants to stall. If you have any questions, please call me. Regards /s/ Don Dempsey, Assistant to Director Department of Property Management cc: Go P, Taylor: Acting City Engineer, Hermosa Beach F. J. Karpain, Asst, City Engineer, Redondo Beach OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY January 12, 1971 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: J. B. Mirassou, City Attorney Re: Beach Ordinance Attached please find a rough draft of an ordinance relating to rules and regulations for the use of this City's Beach and Strand. This is presented to you for consideration onlyi and not for introduction, and was prepared as a result of a request from the Office of the County Counsel for all South Bay beach cities to review and update their "Beach Ordinances" in an attempt to establish applicable uniform standards on all county and city beaches. This will also make possible combining the fourteen separate ordinances adopted since 1945 which relate to this City's control of its beach into one ordinance and having them brought together under one section of the City Code. Your review and comments regarding this proposed ordinance would be greatly appreciated. Respectfully submitted, J. B. MIRi.SSOU, City Attorney bf 1 2 3 i 4 5 61 7!: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24. 25 26 27 , .28 1 29 I 30 31 32 RESOLUTION 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A NO. N. S. 3019 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, TEMPORARY CITY MANAGER. . WHEREAS, under the 'provisions of Ordinance No. N. S. 153, establishing a City Man ger form of government for this City, the City Council shall, following the termtion of th employment of the present City Manager, effective January 10 1971, appoint a Temporary City Manager, to s rve.until such time'as a perman City anager designated* NOW, THEREFORE, TBE.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHi CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: t SECTION 1. That pursuant to Ordinance N. N. p0.153 and Article II, Section 2-7 Of the Municipal Code of the Cityof Hermosa Beach, Bud M. Trott is hereby appointed Temporary City Manager, to hold said office effective January 5, 1971, for and during the pleasure of the City Council, and/or until such time as a permanent City Manager is appointed. SECTION 2. That his compensation sh 11 b, and is hereby fixed at $ ATTEST: per month, payable bi-.weekly. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY, MANAGER January 11 e 1971 TO: Mr. Bud Trott FROM: Ronald $ , Bergman n SUB CT: Resignation T herb resign as Assistant to the City Manager effective laClary 18, 1971. RS T: inrn VA)\3 RO: ALD S. BERGMAN M fsterat to the City Manager TO: Mayor and Members o the City Council FROM: Bud M. Trott, City Manager RE: Report on Revenue and Expenditure from Director Mary Stonier, Assistant Finance Malls reportindicates that we are holding our own on expenditures and revenue. However, there are certain. areas we are taking steps to increase the revenue. (I) Refuse and trash deliquent acco rats (2) Business License (3) Proceed rapidly as possible on s le of City property Ca itaa`ovel _meats For the present we are holding expenditures .n all major Capital Improvement Projects except for the RatIrdad right of way The money that we budget will not complete the project. It will take a proximately $6„GOO to $71000 of additional funding„ to complete the area ..f.ora Pier Avenue to the southerly City limits. /7 Toe Bud oda Trott, City Manager Proms Mary R. Stoniera, Aeeietant Fin Dates January 13ta 1971 inolosed are revenue and expenditure for presentation to the City Council. Revenue An evaluation of revenues to date ind are meeting anticipated levels with a /71f Sale of Real Personal Pr©pertyf a critical item, It does not appear receive all projected revenue in this be taken to expedite receipt of roven School Contribution to Reorsationr an Apportionment, Business Licenses may level with deligent enforcement. There appears to be approximately e20 refuse billingA Steps are being take account s 0 1:xprvndi tur'y° Ea l.xpenditureaa are being held to rees'e of activities in this area will be mai part;uenta will be supplied with a rep Updating of salary records is in pro@ Capp tal ImArovementa Civic Center Improvements (Police Dap begun, Strand .:alk (south of Pier Av Lifeguard Headquarters construction a year, fe reoovery may .be realised on in conjunction with AD , l in this fie Improvement has not begun, .§:eunInane..2L By pursuing receipt of all possible sources of revenue, and main- taining control of expenditures, the City's financial position can be maintained on a stable level. Tiring on revenue receipts and expenditures will remain a vital frog^. A timing control will be set up to maintain adequate availability of funds. This will have to be done oarefully to insure adequ-te operation of all departments. rs Director sports thru December 31, 1970 cater that our revenues rtain exceptions. -Account @presenting e90,0000O0 is easonable that we can fiscal year. Action will o due in Account 153$ . 1000v County Gas Tax reach anticipated. revenue 000000 outstanding on to rcooerer these delinqunt. ble levels, Coordination .A with your office. Do- t of expenditures monthly. Bed rtment) 415,000000 has not nae) will be predicated on d may be deferred until next le City property acquisition al year. Valley Park Comment All personnel within the finance dep-tarsen.$ have been very cooperative and receptive to proposed orgaanisaati anal shifts. • The department heads are being very helpful in ovary area FUND NUMBER GENERAL ACCOUNT 100 200. 500 600 800 900 1000 1200 1700. 1800 1900 General Adv. Music & Pks Light District. Traffio Safety Parking Meters State Gas. Tax County Gas:Tax Retirement Parks Recreation Sewer Maintenance 59,768.48 *200,000.00 559,44,69' CITY OF HERMOSA`BE:.CH, CITY TREASURER'S REPORT, DECEMBER 1970 BALANCE 12/1/70 *200,000..00 (68,011.61) 187.44 RECEIPTS CASH TRANSFERS DISBURSEMENTS WARRANTS. TRANSFERS 539.94. 5b1,508.59. 59448.85 *Temporary Transfer $211,711.41 $.70,386.2.1 $2179898.53 5,676.18 18,568.89 6,798.35 677.83 13,173.53. 24,887.21 14,846.07 11,352.37 59776.18 313;468.02- 283.38 BALANCE 12/30/70 *200,000.00 (3,812.52) 5,676.18 18,756.33 6,798.35 1,217.77 3,956.91 570,441.83 4,257.33 9,000.00 17,078.73 - 14,846.07 11,352 37 70,386.21 65,544.66 *200,000.00 222,439.24 70,386.21 650,470.47 0-/7-0 BANK HT }NOES cc 150,953.36 39374.54 General 7,921.70 89436.12 Sewer Dept.. 3,375.39 1,033.76 St. Bond 8,436.97 7,395.86 Payroll Acct. 2,989.74 4,329.65 Refuse & Sanit.7,395.86 33,542.64 Supt. of Sts. 49329.65 58,112.57 VPD Bd. Lets 24,709.25 210,111.92 60,528.88 149,583.44 Inactive 759,000.00 Total 908,583.04 TRUST FUNDS 1/70 REC;IV"s:;D : ri Sewer Deposit Street Bond Payroll; -Account Refuse & Sanitation. Supt. of .Streets VPD Bond Int. & Debt. Inactive Deposits MIFCrocker Citizens Active Deposits Bank of America Crocker Citizens 29849.54 7,255.02 1,011.25 12,548.31 4,329.65 32 638.04 60,631.81 7599000.00 12,049.23 1379533.81 149956.3.04 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE 22,615.53 525.00 1,181.10 1499943.41 1499920..90 17,395.86 22,548.31 966.90 62.30 170,012.27 172,531.51 RECAP OF .LL General active Other Active Total Active Inactive FUNDS $100,470.47 49 112.57 149,5 94 759,000.00 9U89583.04 Less Outsd. Cks. MAR1,.R. •TONIER City Treasurer January 12, 1971. r,= January 40 1971 Honorable t,.ayoo and City Council City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Bad T California ntlemens I have been advised by the Finan @ s Department that warrant E1umb * O133 dated December 15c 1970p payable to Industrial Yang et Inc0T in the amount of 65.57 is a duplicate ate ceps * Your authorisation to cancel it is : oweniad0 V...s y truly you -o g MARYlie "1.ONIE City Treasurer City of Hermosa Beach ARS a s • NON -AGENDA ITEMS - INFORMATION With Agenda for January 19 1971 Police Depautmenitt11.stlepsoctl October, 1970 Available from Office of City Clerk: Letter dated December 30, 19700 stating Supervisor Prank G. Bonelli's stand against legal action proposed by Mayor Sam Yorty to recover full cost of providing law enforcement services through Sheriff's office to those cities which contract for such services. Resolution No, 4258, adopted by City of Hawthorne° opposing plan to consolidate the Superior and Municipal Courts. Resolution No. 1488, adopted by City of Rialto, urging annual inspection of every motor vehicle for efficient emission control devices. Resolution No. 2498, adopted by City of Downey, protesting high County Tax Rate and urging State Legislature to provide funds for State Mandated Programs. Resolution No. 162, adopted by City of San Mateo, memorializing State Legislature to provide meaningful tax relief for the homeowner. Resolution No. 42790 adopted by City of West Covina, advocating use of surplus military aircraft in fighting forest fires. Public Utilities Commission: Notice of Hearing - Application of California Water Service Company for increase of rates in Hermosa -Redondo District Monday, February 8, 19710 1 p,m. Council Chambers, City Hall, Redondo Beach; Report on Financial Requirements, Decedber, /970, from California Water Service Company. MEETINGS AND OTHER EVENTS: Inter-Cit2tHighwgy_22mIttee - Thursday, January 14 - Lawndale - 6:30 p.m. SW Area Planning Council - Friday, January 15 - Lobster House - Noon Planning Commission - Monday, January 18 - Council Chamber - 730 p.m. •CitytC2gns11 - Tuesday, January 19 - Personnel Session° 630 p.m. - Regular Meeting - Council Chamber - 7:30 p.m. League of CaliforniaCities - General Membership. - Thursday, January 21 -' Santa Anita Racetrack - Dinner 6 p.m. Beach Plan Committee - Thursday, January 21 - Council Chamber 700 p.m. Youth Advissu Council - Monday, January 25 - Conference Room - 7:30 p.m. Board of Zoningkj-Vustrae_xtZzPlannirnanission - Joint Meeting Monaay, January25Council ChaMber - 7:30 p.m. Civil Service Commission - Tuesday, January 26 - Council Chamber 730 p.m. Park and Recreation Commission - Wednesday, January 27 - Council ChaMber 8 p.m. South Bay Couyapilmen's Assn- Thursday, January 28- Sas Cafe, Torrance a 630 p.m. 21.amina_Commission - Monday, February 1 - Council. Chamber - 7:30 p.m. City Council - Tuesday, February 2 - Council Chamber - 7230 p.m. ANNUAL BOY SCOUT PARADE - Saturday, February 6 - 10 a.m. 19TH ANNUAL LONG..DISTANCE RUN - Sunday, February 7 i�.